LIVESTREAM – Berlin / Germany – Protesters Rally Against Eviction Of ‘Kopi-Platz’ #irl

Become a Patron!
True Information is the most valuable resource and we ask you to give back.

http://www.berndpulch.org

THE ONLY WEBSITE WITH THE LICENSE TO SPY!

LIVESTREAM – Nuremberg / Germany – FREEDOM FIGHTERS Gather In For New Round Of Protests

Become a Patron!
True Information is the most valuable resource and we ask you to give back.

http://www.berndpulch.org

THE ONLY WEBSITE WITH THE LICENSE TO SPY!

LEAKED – ANGELA MERKEL & UKRAINE IN THE EYES OF THE US GOVERNMENT – ORIGINAL DOCUMENT

Become a Patron!
True Information is the most valuable resource and we ask you to give back.

http://www.berndpulch.org

THE ONLY WEBSITE WITH THE LICENSE TO SPY!

Continue reading “LEAKED – ANGELA MERKEL & UKRAINE IN THE EYES OF THE US GOVERNMENT – ORIGINAL DOCUMENT”

Germany – Nazi Death Camp Secretary ‘On The Run’ Ahead Of Trial

Become a Patron!
True Information is the most valuable resource and we ask you to give back.

http://www.berndpulch.org

THE ONLY WEBSITE WITH THE LICENSE TO SPY!

A district court in Germany has issued an arrest warrant for a 96-year-old woman due to go on trial on Thursday on charges of complicity in murder at the Stutthof death camp during World War II, court officials say. Irmgard F., who prosecutors say worked as a secretary at the camp from 1943 to 1945, left the elderly care home she is living in on Thursday morning by taxi and went to an underground station, a spokeswoman for the Itzehoe district court said. Her whereabouts are unknown. DW’s Luise von Richthofen, who is at the court, said that the announcement of the woman’s disappearance came as the trial was about to open. “If they find her, they will bring her to court today, read the arrest warrant, and they still have to determine whether she is fit to stand trial,” von Richthofen said.

Protesters March Against COVID Restrix, Vaccination In Berlin

Become a Patron!
True Information is the most valuable resource and we ask you to give back.

http://www.berndpulch.org

THE ONLY WEBSITE WITH THE LICENSE TO SPY!

Unveiled – “Schwerpunktaktion Corona Pflege” In Hessen, Germany – Original Document

Become a Patron!
True Information is the most valuable resource and we ask you to give back.

http://www.berndpulch.org

THE ONLY WEBSITE WITH THE LICENSE TO SPY!

Page 1 of Hessen Schwerpunktaktion Corona Pflege
Continue reading “Unveiled – “Schwerpunktaktion Corona Pflege” In Hessen, Germany – Original Document”

Putin’s KGB German Telephone Documents Unveiled – Original Documents

Become a Patron!
True Information is the most valuable resource and we ask you to give back.

http://www.berndpulch.org

THE ONLY WEBSITE WITH THE LICENSE TO SPY!

Page 1 of Putin Telefonanschluss
Continue reading “Putin’s KGB German Telephone Documents Unveiled – Original Documents”

Anti-Vaxxers Disrupt WEF’s Baerbock Chancellor Campaign Event In Stuttgart

Become a Patron!
True Information is the most valuable resource and we ask you to give back.

http://www.berndpulch.org

THE ONLY WEBSITE WITH THE LICENSE TO SPY!

Anti-vaccination protesters interfered with Green Party chancellor candidate Annalena Baerbock’s campaign event in Stuttgart, on Tuesday. With whistles, trumpets, loudspeakers, and megaphones, the protesters tried to drown out the politician’s speech at Marienplatz. Protesters were holding up signs reading ‘Hands off our children’ and ‘Basic rights instead of privileges’ and chanted ‘Baerbock has to go’ at the stage during the whole speech. Some protesters were wearing yellow armbands labelled ‘unvaccinated’ comparing the vaccination process and its regulations to the Nazi rule. Baerbock addressed the protest and offered to answer their questions after the event. “You only have to be patient for 20 minutes, just like at school, and I’ll be happy to answer your questions,” she said. The Green cancidate is currently on a campaign tour for the German federal elections set for September 26. Her next stops will be Wurzburg, Erlangen, and Munich on September 22.

#Baerbock #GermanElection #Stuttgart

TAPED – MERKEL ARRANGES DEAL BETWEEN BIONTECH PFIZER & RAMAPHOSA – FOR FREE ?

Become a Patron!
True Information is the most valuable resource and we ask you to give back.

http://www.berndpulch.org

THE ONLY WEBSITE WITH THE LICENSE TO SPY!

Merkel And BioNTech-Chief Make Deal With Ramaphosa

Merkel And BioNTech-Chief Make Deal With Ramaphosa

Angela Merkel caught on Tape: She thinks the cameras are out but they are still running. She has been recorded arranging a deal between BioNTech/Pfizer and the South African President Cyrill Ramaphosa.

Ramaphosa is allegedly corrupt:

Cyril Ramaphosa has a net worth estimated to be $464.2 million, which is approximately R6.5 billion.

Merkel Slammed Over Failure To Tackle Dire Threat From China ‘Lost Contact With Reality!’ 

Become a Patron!
True Information is the most valuable resource and we ask you to give back.

http://www.berndpulch.org

THE ONLY WEBSITE WITH THE LICENSE TO SPY!

ANGELA MERKEL’s legacy on China has been savaged by MEP Reinhard Bütikofer who criticised the German Chancellor’s long-standing position on Beijing. The outgoing German Chancellor has faced strong criticism over the European Union’s relationship with China as the long-running stateswoman comes to the end of her time in office.

Germany – Protesters Boo Saxony Minister President At Leipzig CDU Event

Become a Patron!
True Information is the most valuable resource and we ask you to give back.

http://www.berndpulch.org

THE ONLY WEBSITE WITH THE LICENSE TO SPY!

Dozens of protesters gathered outside a CDU citizens’ dialogue campaign event in Leipzig on Thursday, to protest against the party and in particular the policies put in place to fight the coronavirus pandemic. Protesters could be seen waving various placards and banners and chanting ‘Traitors to the people’ at those attending the CDU event. Saxony Minister President Michael Kretschmer was booed by the protesters as his vehicle arrived at the event, and dozens of people were deployed to keep the protesters separate from the event. A cordoned-off demonstration area was set up at a square nearby.​ #Leipzig #CDU #Germany

Exposed – The German Social Credit System – Adapted From China – Original Document

Become a Patron!
True Information is the most valuable resource and we ask you to give back.

http://www.berndpulch.org

THE ONLY WEBSITE WITH THE LICENSE TO SPY!

China's Social Credit System puts its people under pressure to be model  citizens

The VENGEFUL Execution Of Lord Haw Haw – William Joyce The Nazi Traitor – Video

Become a Patron!
True Information is the most valuable resource and we ask you to give back.

http://www.berndpulch.org

THE ONLY WEBSITE WITH THE LICENSE TO SPY!

During the Second World War, propaganda was used by all countries involved for various different purposes. The Nazis used it to poison the minds of the population and promote their brutal and horrific policies, but propaganda came in a number of different forms. Radio broadcasts were utilised to play to the enemy also, and the Germans frequently tried to affect British morale with radio broadcasts.

One of the most famous figures of the Second World War was William Joyce, who was known to the British as Lord Haw Haw. Joyce was a traitor who defected from Britain to Nazi Germany shortly before World War Two broke out to work for Hitler’s regime. He was a leading member of the British Union of Fascists, however once he arrived in Germany he was given a job by Joseph Goebbels’ Ministry of Propaganda, and he began to broadcast his radio show Germany Calling.

This attracted millions of listeners each time it was broadcast, and the British government even encouraged the population not to listen to it. During the broadcasts Joyce would talk about the German Army’s strength and try to demoralise the British and the US, however he became known as Lord Haw Haw for his upper class accent. His final radio broadcast came as Berlin fell into the Soviet hands in April 1945, however the hunt was on by the British to capture Lord Haw Haw.

He was eventually found near to Denmark with his wife and was wounded by a British soldier and then was transferred for his trial. At trial he was sentenced to death for treason, and his death sentence is rather controversial as it was argued he could not be condemned as he had obtained a British passport under false pretences. However this sentence was carried out, and Lord Haw Haw was executed.

So join us today as we look at, ‘The VENGEFUL Execution Of Lord Haw Haw – William Joyce, The Nazi Traitor.’

Foreign Policy – “Germany’s Online Crackdowns Inspire the World’s Dictators” – Made In Germany Für Diktaturen

Become a Patron!
True Information is the most valuable resource and we ask you to give back.

http://www.berndpulch.org

THE ONLY WEBSITE WITH THE LICENSE TO SPY!

By Jacob Mchangama, the executive director of Justitia, a Copenhagen based think tank focusing on human rights, and Joelle Fiss

Jacob Mchangama is the executive director of Justitia, a Copenhagen based think tank focusing on human rights and the rule of law and author of the forthcoming book Free Speech: A History From Socrates to Social Media.

Joelle Fiss is a human rights expert, researcher and analyst based in Geneva, Switzerland, and a member of the OSCE/ODIHR Panel of Experts on Freedom of Religion or Belief. Joelle has worked for Human Rights First and for the Alliance of Liberals and Democrats in the European Parliament. 

An anti-hate speech law written in Berlin has been copy-pasted by authoritarian regimes from Caracas to Moscow.

Ein in Berlin verfasstes Anti-Hassrede-Gesetz wurde von autoritären Regimen von Caracas bis Moskau kopiert.

Since the adoption of the new German law, at least 13 countries—in addition to the European Commission—have adopted or proposed models of intermediary liability broadly similar to the act’s matrix. According to Freedom House’s 2019 assessment of freedom on the internet, four of those countries are ranked as being “not free” (Venezuela, Vietnam, Russia and Belarus, Honduras is not surveyed but is ranked as “not free” on press freedom), five are ranked “partly free” (Kenya, India, Singapore, Malaysia, and the Philippines), and only three are ranked “free” (France, the United Kingdom, and Australia). With the exception of India, Kenya, Vietnam, and Australia, all these countries—as well as the European Commission—have explicitly referred to the Network Enforcement Act as an inspiration or justification for their models of intermediary liability.

Moreover, several of these countries, including Venezuela, Vietnam, India, Russia, Malaysia, and Kenya, require intermediaries to remove vague categories of content that include “fake news,” “defamation of religions,” and “anti-government propaganda,” and many of them include overly broad definitions of hate speech that go much further than the German law. A Russian bill signed into law by President Vladimir Putin in March is a good example. 

Seit der Verabschiedung des neuen deutschen Gesetzes haben mindestens 13 Länder – neben der Europäischen Kommission – Modelle der Vermittlerhaftung übernommen oder vorgeschlagen, die der Matrix des Gesetzes weitgehend ähnlich sind. Laut Freedom Houses Einschätzung der Freiheit im Internet von 2019 werden vier dieser Länder als „nicht frei“ eingestuft (Venezuela, Vietnam, Russland und Weißrussland, Honduras wird nicht befragt, aber als „nicht frei“ in Bezug auf Pressefreiheit eingestuft), fünf werden als „teilweise frei“ eingestuft (Kenia, Indien, Singapur, Malaysia und die Philippinen), und nur drei werden als „frei“ eingestuft (Frankreich, Großbritannien und Australien). Mit Ausnahme von Indien, Kenia, Vietnam und Australien haben sich alle diese Länder – ebenso wie die Europäische Kommission – ausdrücklich auf den Network Enforcement Act als Inspiration oder Rechtfertigung für ihre Modelle der Vermittlerhaftung bezogen.

Darüber hinaus verlangen mehrere dieser Länder, darunter Venezuela, Vietnam, Indien, Russland, Malaysia und Kenia, dass Vermittler vage Kategorien von Inhalten entfernen, darunter „Fake News“, „Diffamierung von Religionen“ und „Anti-Regierungs-Propaganda“. und viele von ihnen enthalten zu weit gefasste Definitionen von Hassrede, die weit über das deutsche Gesetz hinausgehen. Ein gutes Beispiel dafür ist ein russisches Gesetz, das Präsident Wladimir Putin im März unterzeichnet hat.

“Socially significant information disseminated under the guise of reliable messages, which creates a threat to life and (/or) the health of citizens or property, the threat of mass disturbance of public order and (/or) public safety, or the threat of creating or impairing the proper operation of vital elements of transport or social infrastructure, credit institutions, energy facilities, industry or communications.”

Any controversial opinion or criticism of the government could plausibly be covered by this overly broad and vague definition, which falls considerably short of international human rights standards.

The explanatory report of the Russian bill explicitly referred to the Network Enforcement Act, and, responding to criticism, Kremlin representatives argued that false information “is regulated fairly harshly in many countries of the world including Europe. It is therefore of course necessary to do it in our country too.” This is a clear example of how Germany’s internet law provides cover for authoritarian states attempting to restrict online content.

„Unter dem Deckmantel zuverlässiger Nachrichten verbreitete gesellschaftlich bedeutsame Informationen, die eine Gefahr für das Leben und (/oder) die Gesundheit von Bürgern oder Eigentum, die Gefahr einer Massenstörung der öffentlichen Ordnung und (/oder) der öffentlichen Sicherheit oder die Gefahr von Schaffung oder Beeinträchtigung des ordnungsgemäßen Funktionierens lebenswichtiger Elemente der Verkehrs- oder sozialen Infrastruktur, von Kreditinstituten, Energieanlagen, der Industrie oder der Kommunikation.“

Jede kontroverse Meinung oder Kritik an der Regierung könnte plausibel durch diese zu weite und vage Definition abgedeckt werden, die deutlich hinter den internationalen Menschenrechtsstandards zurückbleibt.

Der erläuternde Bericht des russischen Gesetzentwurfs bezog sich ausdrücklich auf das Netzdurchsetzungsgesetz, und als Reaktion auf die Kritik argumentierten Kreml-Vertreter, dass falsche Informationen „in vielen Ländern der Welt, einschließlich Europa, ziemlich streng reguliert werden. Deshalb ist es natürlich auch in unserem Land notwendig, dies zu tun.“ Dies ist ein klares Beispiel dafür, wie das deutsche Internetrecht autoritären Staaten Schutz bietet, die versuchen, Online-Inhalte einzuschränken.

In May, Singapore adopted the wide-ranging Protection from Online Falsehoods and Manipulation Bill. The law includes a vague definition of “false statements of fact,” authorizing a minister to issue directions to internet intermediaries that must correct or disable content. Prior to the adoption of the bill, a preliminary report referenced the German law. What might constitute false statement of facts? A 2018 report by the policy forum of Singapore’s ruling People’s Action Party highlighted a Human Rights Watch report critical of press freedom restrictions in Singapore as based on “deliberate falsehoods” used to “advocate political change.” In other words, the law may well be used to target human rights and civil society groups shining a critical light on the Singaporean government.

However, both the Russian and Singaporean laws pale in comparison to the sweeping category of illegal content covered by Vietnam’s draconian Law on Cybersecurity, which passed in 2018 and prohibits: “propaganda against the Socialist Republic of Vietnam,” “distortion or defamation of the people’s administrative authorities,” “psychological warfare … causing division or hatred between [Vietnamese] ethnic groups, religions and people of all countries,” “insulting the [Vietnamese] people, the national flag, national emblem, national anthem, great men, leaders, famous people or national heroes,” and “invented or untruthful contents causing confusion amongst the Citizens.”

Im Mai verabschiedete Singapur das weitreichende Gesetz zum Schutz vor Online-Fälschungen und Manipulationen. Das Gesetz enthält eine vage Definition von „falschen Tatsachenbehauptungen“, die einen Minister ermächtigt, Internetvermittlern Anweisungen zu erteilen, die Inhalte korrigieren oder deaktivieren müssen. Vor der Verabschiedung des Gesetzentwurfs wurde in einem Vorbericht auf das deutsche Recht verwiesen. Was könnte eine falsche Tatsachenbehauptung darstellen? Ein Bericht des Politikforums der regierenden People’s Action Party in Singapur aus dem Jahr 2018 hob einen Bericht von Human Rights Watch hervor, der die Beschränkungen der Pressefreiheit in Singapur kritisiert, die auf „absichtlichen Unwahrheiten“ basieren, die verwendet werden, um „politischen Wandel zu befürworten“. Mit anderen Worten, das Gesetz kann durchaus dazu verwendet werden, Menschenrechts- und Zivilgesellschaftsgruppen anzugreifen, die ein kritisches Licht auf die singapurische Regierung werfen.

Allerdings verblassen sowohl die russischen als auch die singapurischen Gesetze im Vergleich zu der umfassenden Kategorie illegaler Inhalte, die unter das drakonische Gesetz zur Cybersicherheit von Vietnam fallen, das 2018 verabschiedet wurde und Folgendes verbietet: „Propaganda gegen die Sozialistische Republik Vietnam“, „Verzerrung oder Diffamierung der Volksrechte“ Verwaltungsbehörden“, „psychologische Kriegsführung … die Spaltung oder Hass zwischen [vietnamesischen] ethnischen Gruppen, Religionen und Menschen aller Länder hervorruft“, „Beleidigung des [vietnamesischen] Volkes, der Nationalflagge, des nationalen Emblems, der Nationalhymne, großer Männer, Führer, berühmte Persönlichkeiten oder Nationalhelden“ und „erfundene oder unwahre Inhalte, die unter den Bürgern Verwirrung stiften“.

It is also problematic that some states, including Russia and Vietnam, have established (or proposed to establish) governmental entities responsible for notifying and ordering intermediaries to remove illegal content without any independent review or complaint mechanisms. When you combine the sweeping nature of the prohibited content with the lack of meaningful oversight, it is clear that these laws will serve to further entrench tight government control over an already restrictive online sphere.

Several of the laws or proposals we identified, including in the U.K. and India, don’t merely rely on a notification and takedown regime. They establish a “duty of care” requiring intermediaries to actively police and preventively remove illegal or undesirable content. Such a step may encourage automated moderation or filtering of user content through artificial intelligence and upload filters. This essentially poses the risk of reintroducing government-mandated prepublication censorship enforced by private tech companies. In the 18th and 19th centuries, European censors lost the struggle to keep up with clandestine publications and increasingly sophisticated printing presses. Consequently, pre-publication censorship all but died in the second half of the 19th century, only to be revamped and revitalized by totalitarianism in the 20th century. But in the digital age, censorship may ultimately be able to search and destroy undesirable content at a scale previously unimaginable.

All these developments suggest that the Network Enforcement Act has provided an important impetus for, and legitimacy to, models of intermediary liability that violate freedom of expression as set out in Article 19 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. This development contributes significantly to the weakening of the already perilous state of internet freedom around the world.

The adverse consequences of the Network Enforcement Act were certainly not intended by the German government. In conjunction with the German constitution and commitment to the rule of law, the act provides safeguards absent from the most draconian laws subsequently adopted by other states. Indeed, several of the countries that have mimicked the German law had already implemented severe restrictions of online freedom prior to the German initiative and would likely have tightened their grip irrespective of the Network Enforcement Act.

Yet, the act seems to have provided several states with both the justification and the basic model for swift and decisive action. Unwittingly, Europe’s most influential country has contributed to the erosion of global internet freedom by developing and legitimizing a prototype of online censorship that can readily be adapted to serve the ends of authoritarian states.

In a world where both online and offline speech is under systematic global attack, democracies have a special obligation to err on the side of free speech. Succumbing to the ever-present temptation of fighting illiberal ideas with illiberal laws is shortsighted and irresponsible. Once democracies cede the high ground, authoritarians will rush in, creating a regulatory race to the bottom. This entails severe and negative consequences for free speech, independent media, vibrant civil society, and political pluralism, without which authoritarianism cannot be defeated, nor democracy defended.

Problematisch ist auch, dass einige Staaten, darunter Russland und Vietnam, staatliche Stellen eingerichtet haben (oder deren Einrichtung vorgeschlagen haben), die dafür verantwortlich sind, Vermittler zu benachrichtigen und anzuweisen, illegale Inhalte ohne unabhängige Überprüfungs- oder Beschwerdemechanismen zu entfernen. Wenn man die weitreichende Natur der verbotenen Inhalte mit dem Fehlen einer sinnvollen Aufsicht kombiniert, wird klar, dass diese Gesetze dazu dienen werden, eine strenge staatliche Kontrolle über eine bereits restriktive Online-Sphäre weiter zu verankern.

Mehrere der von uns identifizierten Gesetze oder Vorschläge, darunter in Großbritannien und Indien, beruhen nicht nur auf einem Benachrichtigungs- und Deaktivierungsregime. Sie begründen eine „Sorgfaltspflicht“, die Vermittler verpflichtet, illegale oder unerwünschte Inhalte aktiv zu überwachen und präventiv zu entfernen. Ein solcher Schritt kann eine automatisierte Moderation oder Filterung von Benutzerinhalten durch künstliche Intelligenz und Upload-Filter fördern. Dies birgt im Wesentlichen das Risiko der Wiedereinführung der von der Regierung vorgeschriebenen Vorab-Zensur, die von privaten Technologieunternehmen durchgesetzt wird. Im 18. und 19. Jahrhundert verloren die europäischen Zensoren den Kampf, mit geheimen Veröffentlichungen und immer ausgefeilteren Druckereien Schritt zu halten. Infolgedessen starb die Zensur vor der Veröffentlichung in der zweiten Hälfte des 19. Jahrhunderts praktisch aus, um im 20. Aber im digitalen Zeitalter kann Zensur letztendlich in der Lage sein, unerwünschte Inhalte in einem bisher unvorstellbaren Ausmaß zu durchsuchen und zu zerstören.

All diese Entwicklungen legen nahe, dass das Netzdurchsetzungsgesetz einen wichtigen Impuls und Legitimität für Modelle der Haftung von Vermittlern gegeben hat, die die Meinungsfreiheit gemäß Artikel 19 des Internationalen Pakts über bürgerliche und politische Rechte verletzen. Diese Entwicklung trägt maßgeblich dazu bei, den ohnehin schon lebensgefährlichen Zustand der Internetfreiheit weltweit zu schwächen.

Die nachteiligen Folgen des NetzDG waren von der Bundesregierung sicherlich nicht beabsichtigt. In Verbindung mit der deutschen Verfassung und dem Bekenntnis zur Rechtsstaatlichkeit bietet das Gesetz Garantien, die von den drakonischsten Gesetzen, die später von anderen Staaten verabschiedet wurden, fehlen. Tatsächlich hatten einige der Länder, die das deutsche Gesetz nachgeahmt haben, bereits vor der deutschen Initiative starke Einschränkungen der Online-Freiheit eingeführt und hätten ihre Kontrolle wahrscheinlich unabhängig vom Netzdurchsetzungsgesetz verschärft.

Dennoch scheint das Gesetz mehreren Staaten sowohl die Rechtfertigung als auch das Grundmodell für schnelles und entschlossenes Handeln geliefert zu haben. Unwissentlich hat Europas einflussreichstes Land zur Aushöhlung der weltweiten Internetfreiheit beigetragen, indem es einen Prototyp der Online-Zensur entwickelt und legitimiert hat, der leicht an autoritäre Staaten angepasst werden kann.
In einer Welt, in der sowohl die Online- als auch die Offline-Sprache systematisch weltweit angegriffen wird, haben Demokratien eine besondere Verpflichtung, auf der Seite der freien Meinungsäußerung zu irren. Der allgegenwärtigen Versuchung zu erliegen, illiberale Ideen mit illiberalen Gesetzen zu bekämpfen, ist kurzsichtig und verantwortungslos. Wenn Demokratien erst einmal die Oberhand verlieren, werden Autoritäre eingreifen und einen Regulierungswettlauf nach unten auslösen. Dies hat schwerwiegende und negative Folgen für die freie Meinungsäußerung, unabhängige Medien, eine lebendige Zivilgesellschaft und den politischen Pluralismus, ohne die der Autoritarismus nicht besiegt und die Demokratie nicht verteidigt werden kann.

https://foreignpolicy.com/2019/11/06/germany-online-crackdowns-inspired-the-worlds-dictators-russia-venezuela-india/

Merkel’s New Lockdown Plan – Original Document

Become a Patron!
True Information is the most valuable resource and we ask you to give back.

http://www.berndpulch.org

THE ONLY WEBSITE WITH THE LICENSE TO SPY!

German right-wing leader blasts 'dictator' Merkel | Al Arabiya English
Continue reading “Merkel’s New Lockdown Plan – Original Document”

Leaked – Internal Memo Of German Health Minister Spahn About New Covid19 Measures (Vax, Tests, Masks, Shops) – Neuer Covid19 Spahn – Plan – Original Document

Become a Patron!
True Information is the most valuable resource and we ask you to give back.

http://www.berndpulch.org

THE ONLY WEBSITE WITH THE LICENSE TO SPY!

https://img-s-msn-com.akamaized.net/tenant/amp/entityid/BB1eCfS4.img?h=416&w=624&m=6&q=60&o=f&l=f
Continue reading “Leaked – Internal Memo Of German Health Minister Spahn About New Covid19 Measures (Vax, Tests, Masks, Shops) – Neuer Covid19 Spahn – Plan – Original Document”

Leaked – Scientific Department Of Bundestag Checks Compulsory Vaccination Of Children – Wissenschaftliche Abteilung Des Deutschen Bundestages Prüft Impfpflicht Von Kindern – Original Document

Become a Patron!
True Information is the most valuable resource and we ask you to give back.

http://www.berndpulch.org

THE ONLY WEBSITE WITH THE LICENSE TO SPY!

Why Your Kids Should Still Get Vaccinated During the Coronavirus Pandemic –  Cleveland Clinic
Continue reading “Leaked – Scientific Department Of Bundestag Checks Compulsory Vaccination Of Children – Wissenschaftliche Abteilung Des Deutschen Bundestages Prüft Impfpflicht Von Kindern – Original Document”

LIVESTREAM – Berlin – Germany – COVID-19 Sceptics Hold Demonstration

Become a Patron!
True Information is the most valuable resource and we ask you to give back.

http://www.berndpulch.org

THE ONLY WEBSITE WITH THE LICENSE TO SPY!

Exclusive – Merkel Allegedly Checks Out Delay Of German Elections – Merkel Prüft Wohl Verschiebung der Bundestagswahl – Original Document

Become a Patron!
True Information is the most valuable resource and we ask you to give back.

http://www.berndpulch.org

THE ONLY WEBSITE WITH THE LICENSE TO SPY!

Continue reading “Exclusive – Merkel Allegedly Checks Out Delay Of German Elections – Merkel Prüft Wohl Verschiebung der Bundestagswahl – Original Document”

WEF List Of Global Leaders (“Führer”) Of Tomorrow – Germany Until 2002

Become a Patron!
True Information is the most valuable resource and we ask you to give back.

http://www.berndpulch.org

THE ONLY WEBSITE WITH THE LICENSE TO SPY!

Bill Gates & Angela Merkel, both were together in 1992 as WEF’s Global Leader – “Globale Führer”

The older WEF “Leader (Führer)” Lists have been deleted from their info material, website etc pp.

Mathias DoepfnerChief Executive OfficerAxel Springer Verlag AGGermany
Ralph DommermuthChief Executive Officer1&1 AG & Co. KG&AGermany
Andrea FischerMember of the Federal Assembly of Germany  
Sebastian FreitagManaging DirectorFreitag, Gellert & Co.Germany
Thomas GanswindtPresident, ICN BoardSiemens AGGermany
Reinhard GoehnerMember of the German BundestagFederal Assembly of GermanyGermany
Jürgen R. GrossmannOwner and Chief Executive OfficerGeorgsmarienhütte Holding GmbHGermany
David KamenetzkyHead, Corporate CommunicationsThe Goldman Sachs Group Inc.Germany
Susanne KohoutManaging DirectorNovartis Consumer Health GmbHGermany
Franz-Josef KortümChairmanWebasto AGGermany
Wolfgang KubickiMember of the AssemblyState of Schleswig-HolsteinGermany
Barbara KuxExecutive DirectorFord Motor CompanyGermany
Christine LieberknechtMinister of Federal AffairsState of Thuringia (Land Thüringen)Germany
Ernst-Moritz LippManaging PartnerOdewald & Compagnie GmbHGermany
Stefan LippeChief Executive OfficerSwiss Re GermanyGermany
Sandra MaischbergerModeratorN-TVGermany
Jost A. MassenbergMember of the Executive BoardThyssen Krupp StahlGermany
Angela MerkelChairwoman, CDU, Germany  
Stefan QuandtMember of the Supervisory BoardBMW Bayerische Motoren Werke AGGermany
Tim RennerChairman and Chief Executive OfficerUniversal Entertainment GmbhGermany
Andreas RenschlerSenior Vice-PresidentDaimlerChrysler AGGermany
Wolfgang RiehleVice-President, Chief Financial Officer and Member of the Management BoardWacker Siltronic Gesellschaft für Halbleitermaterialien AGGermany
Christiane zu SalmChief Executive OfficerEuvia Media AGGermany
Stefan SchörghuberChief Executive OfficerSchorghuber Stiftung & Co Holding KGGermany
Ulrich SchumacherPresident and Chief Executive OfficerInfineon Technologies AGGermany
Britta SteilmannChief Executive OfficerSteilmann GroupGermany
Jost StollmannFounder and Chairmancreate.it Services AGGermany
Sabriye TenberkenFounder, Blindenzentrum Tibet, Germany  
Martin VarsavskyPresidentEINSTEINetGermany
Stefan VilsmeierChief Executive Officer and FounderBrainLAB AGGermany
Frank-Detlef WendePresidentPro-De Project Development GmbHGermany
Guido WesterwelleChairman, Freie Demokratische Partei (FDP), Germany  
Wendelin WiedekingPresident and Chief Executive OfficerDr. Ing. H. C. F. Porsche AGGermany
Margrit WieduwiltManaging PartnerDWG Gesellschaft für Beratung und Beteiligung GmbH & Co. KGGermany
Lars WindhorstChairman of the BoardWindhorst AGGermany
Christian WulffChairmanCDU NiedersachsenGermany
Jochen ZeitzChairman of the Board of ManagementPuma AG Rudolf Dassler SportGermany

Angela Merkel Orders Warship To South China Sea As Tensions Mount – Video

Become a Patron!
True Information is the most valuable resource and we ask you to give back.

http://www.berndpulch.org

THE ONLY WEBSITE WITH THE LICENSE TO SPY!

Merkel has ordered the German navy to deploy a warship to the South China Sea as Beijing looks to press maritime claims in the contested region. Germany and India have teamed up to send warships to the South China Sea in a show of naval force designed to counter China’s ambitions in the region.

Hitler’s Executioner – Johann Reichhart – Guillotine – Video

Become a Patron!
True Information is the most valuable resource and we ask you to give back.

In this video, we visit the story of one of Nazi Germany’s most notorious executioners, Johann Reichhart. Beginning his work before Hitler’s rise to power in 1933, Reichhart would go on to execute over 3,000 people, including Sophie and Hans Scholl, the members of the White Rose Resistance Group.

Reichhart would execute his convicts using surprisingly the guillotine, once made famous during the French Revolution. So join us to visit and find out about the infamous second world war executioner, Johann Reichhart.

EU Divided – France & Germany Warned Of Serious Repercussions Over Sidelining MEPs On China

Become a Patron!
True Information is the most valuable resource and we ask you to give back.

France and Germany have been warned over attempts to sidelines the EU Parliament and other member nations in the pursuit of a comprehensive trade deal with China. Emmanuel Macron and Angela Merkel have been warned against trying to dictate to the rest of the European Union over a trade deal with China. 

Revealed – Mohandas Gandhi’s Letter To Adolf Hitler – Original Document

Become a Patron!
True Information is the most valuable resource and we ask you to give back.

Mahatma Gandhi: Die "große Seele" | wissen.de
Page 1 of Mohandas Gandhi's letter to Adolf Hitler

Mahatma Gandhi and Adolf Hitler were two of the most dominant personalities of 20th century — starkly opposite in their philosophy and action, yet they ended up changing the course of history. They never met each other. But Mahatma Gandhi wrote two letters to Adolf Hitler and addressed him as a “friend”. He explained why he called him a friend.

“Dear friend, that I address you as a friend is no formality. I own no foes,” read the opening sentence of the second of Mahatma Gandhi’s letter to Adolf Hitler. This was written on December 24, 1940. His first letter was dated July 23, 1939.

In both the letters, Mahatma Gandhi appealed to Hitler, asking him to end World War II. The first was written at the request of friends while Mahatma Gandhi’s second letter was shot off out of frustration at the expansionist behaviour of Hitler.

In the first letter, Mahatma Gandhi wrote, “Friends have been urging me to write to you for the sake of humanity. But I have resisted their request, because of the feeling that any letter from me would be an impertinence.”

However, he went on to add, “It is quite clear that you are today the one person in the world who can prevent a war which may reduce humanity to the savage state.”

Documentary – Nuremberg Case #1 Doctors Trial

Become a Patron!
True Information is the most valuable resource and we ask you to give back.

The “Doctors Trial ” aka Medical Case charged 24 defendants with responsibility for medical experiments upon concentration camp inmates and other living human subjects, without their consent, in the course of which murders, tortures and other inhuman acts were committed.

The Opening Statement was delivered by Brigadier General Telford Taylor. The two principal prosecutors were McHaney and Hardy. This segment shows two female witnesses who were subject to experiments. After almost 140 days of proceedings, including the testimony of 85 witnesses and the submission of almost 1,500 documents, the Tribunal pronounced their verdicts.

Sixteen of the doctors were found guilty. Seven were sentenced to death and executed on June 2, 1948. They include Karl Brandt and Karl Gebhardt. For further information see http://www.roberthjackson.org

The Paranoia That Cost Hitler The War – Warlords – Hitler Vs Stalin

Become a Patron!
True Information is the most valuable resource and we ask you to give back.

The personalities and spectres of Adolf Hitler and Joseph Stalin loom large in the events of the twentieth Century. They were similar in some respects and yet very different in others.

The first in a series that examines the interaction of the leading protagonists of WW2, this program looks in some depth at the nature of the relationship and interaction of these two ‘warlords’. The use of primary materials and memoirs as sources gives the psycho-historical analysis some substance.

Polyakova, Laruelle, Meister, Barnett – The Kremlin’s Trojan Horses Web – Original Document

Become a Patron!
True Information is the most valuable resource and we ask you to give back.

Page 1 of The Kremlins Trojan Horses Web 1116
Continue reading “Polyakova, Laruelle, Meister, Barnett – The Kremlin’s Trojan Horses Web – Original Document”

Video -The JUSTIFIED Execution Of Ernst Kaltenbrunner – The Monster Of The Holocaust

Become a Patron!
True Information is the most valuable resource and we ask you to give back.

Following the Second World War, there were a number of war crimes trials that aimed to bring the perpetrators of the conflict and also the Holocaust to justice.

The most high profile focussed at Nuremberg, and the Nuremberg Trials featured many of Adolf Hitler’s inner circle and his highest ranking Nazis. One of these men placed on trial was Ernst Kaltenbrunner, the Chief of the Reich Security Main Office or the RSHA.

Kaltenbrunner has gone down in History as one of the worst war criminals of World War 2, and it was his duty to oversee the Gestapo, SD and Kripo. He was a man who helped to contribute to the deportations and deaths inside the concentration camps, and he was responsible for the deaths of hundreds of thousands. He was close with Heinrich Himmler, and Kaltenbrunner was noted for his tall stature and his scarred face, and some even suggest that Himmler was terrified of Kaltenbrunner and his temper.

Following the Second World War, Ernst Kaltenbrunner was arrested on top of a mountain by US Army soldiers after he attempted to flee, and was given away when his mistress ran up to him as he was apprehended. He was placed on trial at Nuremberg despite suffering from two subarachnoid haemorrhages, and for his crimes he was sentenced to death.

He met infamous executioner John C woods at the gallows, and for his crimes committed under the guise of the Second World War he paid the ultimate price. So join us today as we look at, ‘The JUSTIFIED Execution Of Ernst Kaltenbrunner, The Monster Of The Holocaust.’

The JUSTIFIED Execution Of Julius Streicher – The EVIL Nazi Newspaper Editor

Become a Patron!
True Information is the most valuable resource and we ask you to give back.

During the Second World War and as Hitler rose power within Germany, there were a group of high ranking Nazis who helped brainwash the population and also help Hitler instigate a reign of terror.

Following World War 2, the Nuremberg Trials took place in which the remaining high ranking members of the Nazi Party were placed in front of a trial and judged for their crimes such as waging war and the Holocaust. One of these men was Julius Streicher, a horrifically anti-semitic man who helped to spread hatred across Hitler’s Third Reich.

Julius Streicher was by Hitler side since the very start. He was present when Hitler tried to seize control of Munich during the Beer Hall Putsch, and he was a close friend to the Fuhrer of Germany. He later became the Gauleiter of Franconia. Streicher is most well known today for being the founder of Der Sturmer, a virulently anti-semitic newspaper that spread propaganda against those in Germany that were persecuted. Der Sturmer contained shocking images and accusations.

Although Streicher was not a member of the army or the military, after the Second World War he was placed on trial for his crimes involving the Holocaust. It was found that he was guilty of spreading hate and contributing towards the persecution, and for this he was sentenced to death.

It was with the Nuremberg Executions that Streicher was killed by the executioner John C Woods, but his execution did not go to plan. So join us today as we look at, ‘The JUSTIFIED Execution Of Julius Streicher – The EVIL Nazi Newspaper Editor.’