BERND PULCH.ORG – THE HARDER THEY COME THE HARDER THEY FALL -THE INDEPENDENT VOICE OF FREEDOM – NO MORE FAIRY TALES – NO GATES OR SOROS FUNDING – NO PROJECT SYNDICATE – SCHLUSS MIT MÄRCHENSTUNDE – Kein Relotius – Keine Hitler-Tagebücher – Keine Peanuts – Great Reset, Build Back Better, TOXDAT, STASI Liste, STASI Schläfer Liste, KGB Liste, BDVP Liste, DDR POLIZEI Liste, GOMOPA4KIDS-Pädophilen-Netzwerk, GOMOPA Opfer Liste, GOMOPA Täter, NO FAIRY TALES – No Relotius – No Hitler Diaries – No Peanuts – Great Reset – Build Back Better – TOXDAT, STASI List, STASI SLEEPER List, KGB List, BDVP List, STASI Names A-Z, DDR-EAST GERMAN POLICE List, Offshore List, WEF Lists, Leaks Lists, GOMOPA4KIDS-Pedophiles-Network, GOMOPA Victims List, GOMOPA Offender Names, Stalin, Berija, Mao, Xi, Kim, Pol Pot, Putin, Erich Mielke, Ehrenfried Stelzer, Jochen Resch, Alexander Schalck-Golodkowski, Kim Philby, Wolfgang Schnur, IM Erika, Gregor Gysi, Gerhard Schroeder, Matthias Warnig, Friedhelm Laschütza, Angela Merkel, William Borm, Udo Albrecht, Gerhard Baumann, Gert Caden, Andreas Lorch, Anette Lorch, Britta Lorch, Catrin Lorch, Hermann Simm, Mischa Wolf, Peter Ehlers, Axel Hilpert, Thomas Promny, Jan Mucha, Klaus Croissant, Isabell Colonius, Sven Schmidt / Eagle IT, Gerd Löffler, Detlev K. Manthey, Dieter Feuerstein, Klaus-Dieter Maururg, Beate & Thomas Porteischat, Sonja Lünebn, Rainer Rupp, Christel & Günter Guillaume – The One And Only Website With The License To Spy !
Become a Patron!
True Information is the most valuable resource and we ask you to give back.
THE ONLY WEBSITE WITH THE LICENSE TO SPY!
New documents called Pandora Papers, have been released to reveal that the rich live by different rules to the public. Hugely wealthy figures & politicians have had their money secrets revealed… #PandoraPapers #Tax #Billionaires
Become a Patron!
True Information is the most valuable resource and we ask you to give back.
THE ONLY WEBSITE WITH THE LICENSE TO SPY!
/panodra-58e404d73df78c51626efbb8.jpg)
“A 2.94 terabyte data trove exposes the offshore secrets of wealthy elites from more than 200 countries and territories. These are people who use tax and secrecy havens to buy property and hide assets; many avoid taxes and worse. They include more than 330 politicians and 130 Forbes billionaires, as well as celebrities, fraudsters, drug dealers, royal family members and leaders of religious groups around the world.
The International Consortium of Investigative Journalists spent more than a year structuring, researching and analyzing the more than 11.9 million records in the Pandora Papers leak. The task involved three main elements: journalists, technology and time.
The Pandora Papers investigation is the world’s largest-ever journalistic collaboration, involving more than 600 journalists from 150 media outlets in 117 countries.
The investigation is based on a leak of confidential records of 14 offshore service providers that give professional services to wealthy individuals and corporations seeking to incorporate shell companies, trusts, foundations and other entities in low- or no-tax jurisdictions. The entities enable owners to conceal their identities from the public and sometimes from regulators. Often, the providers help them open bank accounts in countries with light financial regulation.
The 2.94 terabytes of data, leaked to ICIJ and shared with media partners around the world, arrived in various formats: as documents, images, emails, spreadsheets, and more.
The records include an unprecedented amount of information on so-called beneficial owners of entities registered in the British Virgin Islands, Seychelles, Hong Kong, Belize, Panama, South Dakota and other secrecy jurisdictions. They also contain information on the shareholders, directors and officers. In addition to the rich, the famous and the infamous, those exposed by the leak include people who don’t represent a public interest and who don’t appear in our reporting, such as small business owners, doctors and other, usually affluent, individuals away from the public spotlight.
While some of the files date to the 1970s, most of those reviewed by ICIJ were created between 1996 and 2020. They cover a wide range of matters: the creation of shell companies, foundations and trusts; the use of such entities to purchase real estate, yachts, jets and life insurance; their use to make investments and to move money between bank accounts; estate planning and other inheritance issues; and the avoidance of taxes through complex financial schemes. Some documents are tied to financial crimes, including money laundering.
The more than 330 politicians exposed by the leak were from more than 90 countries and territories. They used entities in secrecy jurisdictions to buy real estate, hold money in trust, own other companies and other assets, sometimes anonymously.
The Pandora Papers investigation also reveals how banks and law firms work closely with offshore service providers to design complex corporate structures. The files show that providers don’t always know their customers, despite their legal obligation to take care not to do business with people who engage in questionable dealings.
The investigation also reports on how U.S. trust providers have taken advantage of some states’ laws that promote secrecy and help wealthy overseas clients hide wealth to avoid taxes in their home countries.
The 11.9 million-plus records were largely unstructured. More than half of the files (6.4 million) were text documents, including more than 4 million PDFs, some of which ran to more than 10,000-pages. The documents included passports, bank statements, tax declarations, company incorporation records, real estate contracts and due diligence questionnaires. There were also more than 4.1 million images and emails in the leak.
Spreadsheets made up 4% of the documents, or more than 467,000. The records also included slide shows and audio and video files.
The Pandora Papers information – the 2.94 terabytes in more than 11.9 million records – comes from 14 providers that offer services in at least 38 jurisdictions. The 2016 Panama Papers investigation was based on 2.6 terabytes of data in 11.5 million documents from a single provider, the now-defunct Mossack Fonseca law firm. The 2017 Paradise Papers investigation was based on a leak of 1.4 terabytes in more than 13.4 million files from one offshore law firm, Appleby, as well as Asiaciti Trust, a Singapore-based provider, and government corporate registries in 19 secrecy jurisdictions.
The Pandora Papers presented a new challenge because the 14 providers had different ways of presenting and organizing information. Some organized documents by client, some by various offices, and others had no apparent system at all. A single document sometimes contained years’ worth of emails and attachments. Some providers digitized their records and structured them in spreadsheets; others kept paper files that were scanned. Some PDFs contained spreadsheets that had to be reconstructed into spreadsheets. The documents arrived in English, Spanish, Russian, French, Arabic, Korean and other languages, requiring extensive coordination among ICIJ partners.
The Pandora Papers gathered information on more than 27,000 companies and 29,000 so-called ultimate beneficial owners from 11 of the providers, or more than twice the number of beneficial owners identified in the Panama Papers.
The Pandora Papers connected offshore activity to more than twice as many politicians and public officials as did the Panama Papers. And the Pandora Papers’ more than 330 politicians and public officials, from more than 90 countries and territories , included 35 current and former country leaders.
The new leak also includes information on jurisdictions not explored in previous ICIJ projects or for which there was little data, such as Belize, Cyprus and South Dakota.
The legal entities in the files of six providers – the companies, foundations and trusts – were all registered between 1971 and 2018. The records show providers and clients shifting their business from one jurisdiction to another after investigations and resulting rule changes.
Only 4% of the files were structured, with data organized in tables (spreadsheets, csv files and a few “dbf files”).
To explore and analyze the information in the Pandora Papers, ICIJ identified files that contained beneficial ownership information by company and jurisdiction and structured it accordingly. Each provider’s data required a different process.
In cases where information came in spreadsheet form, ICIJ removed duplicates and combined it into a master spreadsheet. For PDF or document files, ICIJ used programming languages such as Python to automate data extraction and structuring as much as possible.
In more complex cases, ICIJ used machine learning and other tools, including the Fonduer and Scikit-learn softwares, to identify and separate specific forms from longer documents.
Some provider forms were handwritten, requiring ICIJ to extract information manually.
Once information was extracted and structured, ICIJ generated lists that linked beneficial owners to the companies they owned in specific jurisdictions. In some cases, information about where or when a company was registered wasn’t available. In others, information was missing about when a person or an entity had become the owner of the company, among other details.
After structuring the data, ICIJ used graphic platforms (Neo4J and Linkurious) to generate visualizations and make them searchable. This allowed reporters to explore connections between people and companies across providers.
The Pandora Papers’s 11.9 million records arrived from 14 different offshore services firms in a jumble of files and formats – even ink-on-paper – presenting a massive data-management challengeBy Emilia Díaz-Struck, Delphine Reuter, Agustin Armendariz, Jelena Cosic, Jesús Escudero, Miguel Fiandor Gutiérrez, Mago Torres, Karrie Kehoe, Margot Williams, Denise Hassanzade Ajiri and Sean McGoeyOctober 3, 2021facebooktwitterlinkedinemail
A2.94 terabyte data trove exposes the offshore secrets of wealthy elites from more than 200 countries and territories. These are people who use tax and secrecy havens to buy property and hide assets; many avoid taxes and worse. They include more than 330 politicians and 130 Forbes billionaires, as well as celebrities, fraudsters, drug dealers, royal family members and leaders of religious groups around the world.
The International Consortium of Investigative Journalists spent more than a year structuring, researching and analyzing the more than 11.9 million records in the Pandora Papers leak. The task involved three main elements: journalists, technology and time.
The Pandora Papers investigation is the world’s largest-ever journalistic collaboration, involving more than 600 journalists from 150 media outlets in 117 countries.
The investigation is based on a leak of confidential records of 14 offshore service providers that give professional services to wealthy individuals and corporations seeking to incorporate shell companies, trusts, foundations and other entities in low- or no-tax jurisdictions. The entities enable owners to conceal their identities from the public and sometimes from regulators. Often, the providers help them open bank accounts in countries with light financial regulation.
The 2.94 terabytes of data, leaked to ICIJ and shared with media partners around the world, arrived in various formats: as documents, images, emails, spreadsheets, and more.
The records include an unprecedented amount of information on so-called beneficial owners of entities registered in the British Virgin Islands, Seychelles, Hong Kong, Belize, Panama, South Dakota and other secrecy jurisdictions. They also contain information on the shareholders, directors and officers. In addition to the rich, the famous and the infamous, those exposed by the leak include people who don’t represent a public interest and who don’t appear in our reporting, such as small business owners, doctors and other, usually affluent, individuals away from the public spotlight.
While some of the files date to the 1970s, most of those reviewed by ICIJ were created between 1996 and 2020. They cover a wide range of matters: the creation of shell companies, foundations and trusts; the use of such entities to purchase real estate, yachts, jets and life insurance; their use to make investments and to move money between bank accounts; estate planning and other inheritance issues; and the avoidance of taxes through complex financial schemes. Some documents are tied to financial crimes, including money laundering.
Donate today and help us inspire and cultivate a global community of reporters and readers who believe journalism can bring about positive change.
The more than 330 politicians exposed by the leak were from more than 90 countries and territories. They used entities in secrecy jurisdictions to buy real estate, hold money in trust, own other companies and other assets, sometimes anonymously.
The Pandora Papers investigation also reveals how banks and law firms work closely with offshore service providers to design complex corporate structures. The files show that providers don’t always know their customers, despite their legal obligation to take care not to do business with people who engage in questionable dealings.
The investigation also reports on how U.S. trust providers have taken advantage of some states’ laws that promote secrecy and help wealthy overseas clients hide wealth to avoid taxes in their home countries.
The 11.9 million-plus records were largely unstructured. More than half of the files (6.4 million) were text documents, including more than 4 million PDFs, some of which ran to more than 10,000-pages. The documents included passports, bank statements, tax declarations, company incorporation records, real estate contracts and due diligence questionnaires. There were also more than 4.1 million images and emails in the leak.
Spreadsheets made up 4% of the documents, or more than 467,000. The records also included slide shows and audio and video files.https://projects.icij.org/investigations/pandora-papers/charts/whats-in-the-pandora-papers-leak?initialWidth=682&childId=icij-iframe-1&parentTitle=Pandora%20Papers%3A%20An%20offshore%20data%20tsunami%20-%20ICIJ&parentUrl=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.icij.org%2Finvestigations%2Fpandora-papers%2Fabout-pandora-papers-leak-dataset%2F
The Pandora Papers information – the 2.94 terabytes in more than 11.9 million records – comes from 14 providers that offer services in at least 38 jurisdictions. The 2016 Panama Papers investigation was based on 2.6 terabytes of data in 11.5 million documents from a single provider, the now-defunct Mossack Fonseca law firm. The 2017 Paradise Papers investigation was based on a leak of 1.4 terabytes in more than 13.4 million files from one offshore law firm, Appleby, as well as Asiaciti Trust, a Singapore-based provider, and government corporate registries in 19 secrecy jurisdictions.
The Pandora Papers presented a new challenge because the 14 providers had different ways of presenting and organizing information. Some organized documents by client, some by various offices, and others had no apparent system at all. A single document sometimes contained years’ worth of emails and attachments. Some providers digitized their records and structured them in spreadsheets; others kept paper files that were scanned. Some PDFs contained spreadsheets that had to be reconstructed into spreadsheets. The documents arrived in English, Spanish, Russian, French, Arabic, Korean and other languages, requiring extensive coordination among ICIJ partners.
The Pandora Papers gathered information on more than 27,000 companies and 29,000 so-called ultimate beneficial owners from 11 of the providers, or more than twice the number of beneficial owners identified in the Panama Papers.
The Pandora Papers connected offshore activity to more than twice as many politicians and public officials as did the Panama Papers. And the Pandora Papers’ more than 330 politicians and public officials, from more than 90 countries and territories , included 35 current and former country leaders.https://projects.icij.org/investigations/pandora-papers/charts/where-are-the-336-politicians-in-the-pandora-papers-from?initialWidth=682&childId=icij-iframe-2&parentTitle=Pandora%20Papers%3A%20An%20offshore%20data%20tsunami%20-%20ICIJ&parentUrl=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.icij.org%2Finvestigations%2Fpandora-papers%2Fabout-pandora-papers-leak-dataset%2F
The new leak also includes information on jurisdictions not explored in previous ICIJ projects or for which there was little data, such as Belize, Cyprus and South Dakota.
The legal entities in the files of six providers – the companies, foundations and trusts – were all registered between 1971 and 2018. The records show providers and clients shifting their business from one jurisdiction to another after investigations and resulting rule changes.
Only 4% of the files were structured, with data organized in tables (spreadsheets, csv files and a few “dbf files”).
To explore and analyze the information in the Pandora Papers, ICIJ identified files that contained beneficial ownership information by company and jurisdiction and structured it accordingly. Each provider’s data required a different process.
In cases where information came in spreadsheet form, ICIJ removed duplicates and combined it into a master spreadsheet. For PDF or document files, ICIJ used programming languages such as Python to automate data extraction and structuring as much as possible.
In more complex cases, ICIJ used machine learning and other tools, including the Fonduer and Scikit-learn softwares, to identify and separate specific forms from longer documents.
Some provider forms were handwritten, requiring ICIJ to extract information manually.
Once information was extracted and structured, ICIJ generated lists that linked beneficial owners to the companies they owned in specific jurisdictions. In some cases, information about where or when a company was registered wasn’t available. In others, information was missing about when a person or an entity had become the owner of the company, among other details.
After structuring the data, ICIJ used graphic platforms (Neo4J and Linkurious) to generate visualizations and make them searchable. This allowed reporters to explore connections between people and companies across providers.
SIGN UP
To identify potential story subjects in the data, ICIJ matched information in the leak against other data sets: sanctions lists, previous leaks, public corporate records, media lists of billionaires and public lists of political leaders.
ICIJ’s partner in Sweden, SVT, generated spreadsheets containing data extracted from passports found in the Pandora Papers.
ICIJ shared records with media partners using Datashare, a secure research and analytical tool developed by ICIJ’s technical team. Datashare’s batch-search function helped reporters match some public figures with the data.
The leak contains routine documents that service providers gather for due diligence – news articles, Wikipedia entries, information from financial data provider World-Check – that don’t necessarily confirm whether a person is hiding wealth in a secrecy jurisdiction. ICIJ used machine learning to tag such files in Datashare, enabling reporters to exclude them from their searches.
Our 150 media partners shared tips, leads and other information of interest using ICIJ’s global I-Hub, a secure social media and messaging platform. Throughout the project, ICIJ held extensive training sessions for partners on the use of ICIJ technology to explore, mine and better understand the files.
Having identified documents that contained information on the owners of offshore entities and structured the information by provider, ICIJ unified the data in a centralized database.
This provided ICIJ and its media partners with a unique data set of beneficial owners of companies in secrecy jurisdictions.
ICIJ eliminated duplications in the data and identified key elements, such as nationality of the owner, country of residence and place of birth. This enabled us to find, for instance, nearly 3,700 companies with more than 4,400 beneficiaries who were Russian nationals – the most among all nationalities in the data. The figure includes 46 Russian oligarchs.
ICIJ also researched and analyzed the use of U.S. trusts, using keyword searches and matches with public data, among other methods.
As a result, ICIJ identified more than 200 trusts settled, or created, in the U.S from 2000 to 2019, with the largest number registered in South Dakota. The trusts were connected with people from 40 countries (not including the U.S.). ICIJ identified assets in single trusts worth between $67,000 and $165 million held between 2000 and 2019. The data shows that U.S. trusts held assets worth a total of more than $1 billion. Those included U.S. real estate and bank accounts in Panama, Switzerland, Luxembourg, Puerto Rico, the Bahamas and elsewhere.
To perform the analysis of U.S.-based trusts, ICIJ manually gathered information on the creators, known as settlors; the beneficiaries, and the assets held by the trusts. ICIJ was able to identify and gather data on trusts from 15 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
ICIJ and its media partners used keyword searches to identify politicians in the data, using passport information to help with the identification.
ICIJ used public records to verify details related to the companies and to be sure the people named in the data were actually the political leaders identified with those names. We found some false positives and discarded them. Among sources used in the research were the Dow Jones Risk and Compliance database, Sayari, Nexis, OpenCorporates, property records in the U.S and U.K., and public corporate records. More than 330 politicians and high level public officials, including 35 country leaders were confirmed.
ICIJ structured the information in a spreadsheet and put it through two rounds of fact-checking. Data gathered on politicians was also visualized in the profiles in our Power Players feature.
ICIJ matched Forbes’s billionaires lists against the Pandora Papers to find more than 130 who had entities in secrecy jurisdictions. More than 100 of them had a combined fortune valued at more than $600 billion in 2021.
ICIJ analyzed 109 so-called suspicious activity reports to financial authorities filed by the Panamanian law firm Alemán, Cordero, Galindo & Lee, or Alcogal, and learned that 87 of the anti-money-laundering forms were written only after authorities or journalists had publicly identified the firm’s clients as involved in alleged wrongdoing.
ICIJ also read through several thousand publicly available employees’ profiles and found out that more than 220 lawyers associated with the giant law firm Baker McKenzie in 35 countries had previously held government posts in agencies including justice departments, tax offices, the EU Commission, and offices of heads of state.
ICIJ also did research and analysis to explore the role offshore finance plays in hiding looted art and ancient relics that authorities and communities seek to reclaim.
Finally, the Pandora Papers investigation identified more than 500 BVI companies that had been clients of Mossack Fonseca, the law firm at the center of the Panama Papers scandal, and moved their business to other BVI providers in the aftermath whom we found in the data.
ICIJ also matched Panamanian companies from the Panama Papers data against data available for the Panama corporate registry on OpenCorporates, and found out that at least 113 companies had changed registered agents and simply moved to Alcogal between April 3, 2016 and 2020. Together with The Miami Herald data team, ICIJ also counted 759 BVI companies that specifically considered moving to Trident Trust as part of the provider’s so-called “Mossfon Project”.
The Pandora Papers probe offers a broad look at secrecy jurisdictions and offshore service providers, but the data came incomplete.
The quality of the data varied by provider. In some cases, the data tied to companies didn’t offer information about the jurisdiction where they were registered, the period during which an individual was linked to an entity, or about intermediaries. The data still offered important information about owners and, in some cases, transactions and other financial details.
The 14 providers, which offered services in at least 38 jurisdictions, are part of a larger industry of offshore services operating around the world. It’s hard to say how much of the universe of provider data we have, a small fraction, probably.
For example, in the BVI, where six, or nearly half, of the providers found in the Pandora Papers have acted as registered agents, they are among at least 101 firms acting in that capacity, according to the BVI Financial Services Commission. In March 2021, there were more than 370,000 active companies, about a dozen for each of the tiny island nation’s inhabitants.
| Provider(Click to sort Ascending) | Records(Click to sort Ascending) | Time Period(Click to sort Ascending) | Founding Office Location | Year Founded(Click to sort Ascending) | Jurisdictions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All About Offshore Limited | 270,328 | Seychelles | 2007 | Seychelles | |
| Alemán, Cordero, Galindo & Lee | 2,185,783 | Panama | 1985 | Bahamas, Belize, British Virgin Islands, Cyprus, Dubai, Geneva, Hong Kong, New Zealand, Panama, Seychelles, Singapore, Switzerland, Uruguay | |
| Alpha Consulting Limited | 823,305 | Seychelles | 2008 | Seychelles, United Arab Emirates, Belize | |
| Asiaciti Trust Asia Limited | 1,800,650 | Hong Kong | 1978 | Singapore, Hong Kong, Cook Islands, Nevis, New Zealand, Panama, Samoa | |
| CCS Trust Limited | 149,378 | Belize | 2005 | Belize | |
| CIL Trust International | 459,476 | Belize | 1994 | Belize, Seychelles | |
| Commence Overseas Limited | 8,661 | British Virgin Islands | 1992 | British Virgin Islands | |
| Demetrios A. Demetriades LLC | 469,184 | Cyprus | 1966 | Cyprus | |
| Fidelity Corporate Services Limited | 213,733 | British Virgin Islands | 2005 | British Virgin Islands, Seychelles, Belize, Latvia, Gibraltar, Hong Kong and Cyprus | |
| Glenn D. Godfrey and Company LLP | 189,907 | Belize | 2003 | Belize | |
| Il Shin | 1,575,840 | 2 offices | 2004 | Hong Kong, Vietnam, China | |
| Overseas Management Company Inc | 190,477 | Panama | 1961 | Anguilla, Bahamas, Belize, British Virgin Islands, Costa Rica, Hong Kong, New Zealand, Panama, Saint Kitts and Nevis, Seychelles, Switzerland, United Arab Emirates, Uruguay | |
| SFM Corporate Services | 191,623 | 2 offices | 2006 | Anguilla, Bahamas, Belize, British Virgin Islands, Canada, Cayman Islands, Cyprus, Delaware, Florida, Gibraltar, Hong Kong, Latvia, St Lucia, Malta, Marshall Islands, Netherlands, Nevis, Mauritius, Panama, Ras Al Khaimah, Samoa, Seychelles, Singapore, Switzerland, United Kingdom, Vanuatu, St Vincent | |
| Trident Trust Company Limited | 3,375,331 | British Virgin Islands |
A significant proportion of the beneficial ownership information in the Pandora Papers comes from reports generated by providers for the BVI’s Beneficial Ownership Secure Search System, or BOSS, established in the wake of the 2016 publication of the Panama Papers. This information is not available to the public.
A 2017 BVI law requires providers to report to BVI authorities the names of the real owners of the companies registered there. The leak identified many documents containing such information.
Alcogal and Trident Trust was where we found a large number of current and former politicians and public officials as clients. Most of their companies were registered in the BVI and Panama. Alcogal clients include nearly half of the politicians and public officials identified in the Pandora Papers. In the beneficial ownership data that ICIJ was able to structure, nearly half of the companies were linked to Alcogal. Alcogal, headquartered in Panama, has among its founders several politicians, one of whom served as Panama’s ambassador to the United States.
Some of the providers, based on their location and the jurisdictions where they do business, such as Cyprus, have a large proportion of Russian clients, the largest group by nationality in the Pandora Papers data.
In the Pandora Papers, more than 30% of the companies that received services from Demetrios A. Demetriades LLC, or DadLaw, a provider headquartered in Cyprus, had one or more Russians as beneficial owners. Similarly, more than 40% of the companies that received services from Seychelles-based Alpha Consulting Group, also had one or more Russians as beneficial owners. Alcogal and Fidelity Corporate Services Limited were also among the providers with the largest number of Russian clients.
A large proportion of beneficial owners appearing in the data are from Latin America. More than 90 of the more 330 politicians and public officials in the data are from Latin America. Argentina, Brazil and Venezuela are among the countries with the largest representation of beneficial owners. In the leaked data, Alcogal headquartered in Panama, has the largest group of Latin American clients.
When it comes to creating offshore companies, foundations and trusts, parties from different parts of the world and with different needs select different providers and jurisdictions for their shell companies.
Pandora Papers documents cover a large number of providers, but obviously not all, or even most, of them, and many jurisdictions are not represented in the data.
In previous ICIJ investigations, including 2017’s Paradise Papers, the leak came from a prestigious law firm with a larger corporate practice, Appleby. As a result, the data included more documents about multinationals. Bermuda and the Cayman Islands, which are popular havens for corporations, were among the jurisdictions with a large presence in that leak.
As for U.S. nationals, ICIJ identified more than 700 companies with beneficial owners connected to the U.S. in the Pandora Papers; Americans were also among the top 20 nationalities represented in the data. In the Pandora Papers, Russia, the United Kingdom, Argentina, China and Brazil, are among the countries with the largest representation of beneficial owners.
In the Paradise Papers, U.S. citizens had a larger relative presence.
With today’s publication, ICIJ is sharing data and details about the use of companies in secrecy jurisdictions by more than 50 politicians, through the Power Players feature. ICIJ is planning to incorporate data from the Pandora Papers into the Offshore Leaks database. To learn more about ICIJ’s data releases, subscribe to ICIJ’s email newsletter.”
By Emilia Díaz-Struck, Delphine Reuter, Agustin Armendariz, Jelena Cosic, Jesús Escudero, Miguel Fiandor Gutiérrez, Mago Torres, Karrie Kehoe, Margot Williams, Denise Hassanzade Ajiri and Sean McGoey
Contributors: Bruno Thomas, Anisha Kohli, Helena Bengtsson, Shirsho Dasgupta, John Keefe, Miranda Patrucic, Pierre Romera, Marcos García Rey
Become a Patron!
True Information is the most valuable resource and we ask you to give back.
THE ONLY WEBSITE WITH THE LICENSE TO SPY!
A massive data leak has revealed the secret financial dealings of some of the world’s richest and most powerful people. The “Pandora Papers” show how politicians, business tycoons and celebrities hide their wealth using off-shore tax havens. The investigation was carried out by the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists, with global media partners including DW.
Become a Patron!
True Information is the most valuable resource and we ask you to give back.
The federal government loses both individual and corporate income tax revenue from the shifting of profits and income into low-tax countries, often referred to as tax havens. The revenue losses from this tax avoidance and evasion are difficult to estimate, but some have suggested that the annual cost of offshore tax abuses may be around $100 billion per year. International tax avoidance can arise from large multinational corporations who shift profits into low-tax foreign subsidiaries or wealthy individual investors who set up secret bank accounts in tax haven countries.
Recent actions by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) and the
G-20 industrialized nations have targeted tax haven countries, focusing primarily on evasion
issues. The recently adopted HIRE Act (P.L. 111-147) included a number of anti-evasion
provisions, and P.L. 111-226 included foreign tax credit provisions. Some of these proposals, and
some not adopted, are in the American Jobs and Closing Loopholes Act (H.R. 4213); the Stop Tax
Haven Abuse Act (S. 506, H.R. 1265); draft proposals by the Senate Finance Committee; two
other related bills, S. 386 and S. 569; the Bipartisan Tax Fairness and Simplification Act (S.
3018); and proposals by President Obama.Multinational firms can artificially shift profits from high-tax to low-tax jurisdictions using a
variety of techniques, such as shifting debt to high-tax jurisdictions. Since tax on the income of
foreign subsidiaries (except for certain passive income) is deferred until repatriated, this income
can avoid current U.S. taxes and perhaps do so indefinitely. The taxation of passive income
(called Subpart F income) has been reduced, perhaps significantly, through the use of “hybrid
entities” that are treated differently in different jurisdictions. The use of hybrid entities was
greatly expanded by a new regulation (termed “check-the-box”) introduced in the late 1990s that
had unintended consequences for foreign firms. In addition, earnings from income that is taxed
can often be shielded by foreign tax credits on other income. On average very little tax is paid on
the foreign source income of U.S. firms. Ample evidence of a significant amount of profit shifting
exists, but the revenue cost estimates vary from about $10 billion to $60 billion per year.
Individuals can evade taxes on passive income, such as interest, dividends, and capital gains, by
not reporting income earned abroad. In addition, since interest paid to foreign recipients is not
taxed, individuals can also evade taxes on U.S. source income by setting up shell corporations
and trusts in foreign haven countries to channel funds. There is no general third party reporting of
income as is the case for ordinary passive income earned domestically; the IRS relies on qualified
intermediaries (QIs) who certify nationality without revealing the beneficial owners. Estimates of
the cost of individual evasion have ranged from $40 billion to $70 billion.Most provisions to address profit shifting by multinational firms would involve changing the tax
law: repealing or limiting deferral, limiting the ability of the foreign tax credit to offset income,
addressing check-the-box, or even formula apportionment. President Obama’s proposals include a
proposal to disallow overall deductions and foreign tax credits for deferred income and
restrictions on the use of hybrid entities. Provisions to address individual evasion include
increased information reporting and provisions to increase enforcement, such as shifting the
burden of proof to the taxpayer, increased penalties, and increased resources. Individual tax
evasion is the main target of the HIRE Act, the proposed Stop Tax Haven Abuse Act, and the
Senate Finance Committee proposals; some revisions are also included in President Obama’s
plan.…
Us Congress Michigan, Us Congress Salary, Us Congress Definition, Us Congress Building, Us Congress News, Us Congress Schedule, Us Congress Bills, Us Congress Internships, Us Congress 2017, Us Congress Representative, Us Congress Address, Us Congress Approval Rating, Us Congress And Senate, Us Congress Api, Us Congress Archives, Us Congress Approval Rating 2017, Us Congress Agenda, Us Congress Ages, Us Congress And Venezuela, Us Congress Acts, Us Congress Building, Us Congress Bills, Us Congress Budget, Us Congress By Party, Us Congress Budget 2017, Us Congress Breakdown, Us Congress Benefits, Us Congress Bill Search, Us Congress By State, Us Congress By Party 2017, Us Congress Committees, Us Congress Calendar 2017, Us Congress Calendar, Us Congress Contact, Us Congress Composition, Us Congress Caucuses, Us Congress California, Us Congress Control, Us Congress Current Events, Us Congress Consists Of, Us Congress Definition, Us Congress Demographics, Us Congress Districts, Us Congress Declares War, Us Congress Directory, Us Congress Democrats, Us Congress Districts By Zip Code, Us Congress Democrat Republican Ratio, Us Congress District 5, Us Congress District 6, Us Congress Elections, Us Congress Elections 2017, Us Congress Election Cycle, Us Congress Explained, Us Congress Email, Us Congress Easter Recess, Us Congress Email Addresses, Us Congress Education Committee, Us Congress Ethics Committee, Us Congress Election 2018, Us Congress Facts, Us Congress Facebook, Us Congress Freedom Caucus, Us Congress Flag, Us Congress From California, Us Congress Filibuster, Us Congress Florida, Us Congress Fight, Us Congress Financial Disclosure, Us Congress From Ny, Us Congress Gang Of Eight, Us Congress Government Shutdown, Us Congress Georgia, Us Congress Gender Ratio, Us Congress Gov, Us Congress Gym, Us Congress Gerrymandering, Us Congress Game, Us Congress Georgia District 6, Us Congress Going Full 1984, Us Congress House, Us Congress Health Insurance, Us Congress History, Us Congress Health Care Plan, Us Congress Hearings, Us Congress Hierarchy, Us Congress Handbook, Us Congress Health Care Bill, Us Congress Health Coverage, Us Congress House Majority Whip, Us Congress Internships, Us Congress In Session, Us Congress Images, Us Congress Is Made Up Of, Us Congress Internet Privacy, Us Congress Illinois, Us Congress Immigration, Us Congress Insurance Plan, Us Congress In 2009, Us Congress Independents, Us Congress Jobs, Us Congress Joint Economic Committee, Us Congress Joint Meeting, Us Congress Joint Committees, Us Congress Joint Committee On Taxation, Us Congress Jerusalem, Us Congress Judiciary Committee, Us Congress Job Description, Us Congress Japan Caucus, Us Congress Joint Session, Us Congress Kansas, Us Congress Korea, Us Congress Kentucky, Us Congress Keith Ellison, Us Congress Keystone, Us Congress Kevin Mccarthy, Us Congress Keystone Pipeline, Us Congress Korea Caucus, Us Congress Kurds, Us Congress Kkk, Us Congress Library, Us Congress Logo, Us Congress Legislation, Us Congress Leadership, Us Congress List, Us Congress Location, Us Congress Live, Us Congress Lapel Pin, Us Congress Legislative Process, Us Congress Leader, Us Congress Michigan, Us Congress Members 2017, Us Congress Map, Us Congress Majority, Us Congress Members, Us Congress Majority Whip, Us Congress Majority Leader, Us Congress Meeting, Us Congress Members Number, Us Congress Majority History, Us Congress News, Us Congress Number, Us Congress Nuclear Option, Us Congress North Korea, Us Congress News Today, Us Congress Net Worth, Us Congress Number Of Members, Us Congress North Carolina, Us Congress Number Of Representatives, Us Congress News Live, Us Congress Oath Of Office, Us Congress Organizational Chart, Us Congress Offices, Us Congress Official Website, Us Congress Ohio, Us Congress On Twitter, Us Congress Online, Us Congress Oregon, Us Congress Overview, Us Congress Oversight Committee, Us Congress Pension, Us Congress Passes First Peacetime Draft, Us Congress Phone Number, Us Congress Pay, Us Congress Passes Lend Lease Act, Us Congress Powers, Us Congress Pin, Us Congress Party Control, Us Congress Party Breakdown 2017, Us Congressperson, Us Congress Quiz, Us Congress Quizlet, Us Congress Quorum, Us Congress Qualifications, Us Congress Qatar, Us Congress Quotes, Us Congress Questions, Us Congress Questions And Answers, Us Congress Question Time, Us Congress Quorum Call, Us Congress Representative, Us Congress Recess, Us Congress Retirement, Us Congress Requirements, Us Congress Reconciliation, Us Congress Recess 2017, Us Congress Requirements To Run, Us Congress Republican, Us Congress Role, Us Congress Resolutions, Us Congress Salary, Us Congress Schedule, Us Congress Seats, Us Congress Session 2017, Us Congress Seal, Us Congress Session, Us Congress Structure, Us Congress Summer Recess 2017, Us Congress Symbol, Us Congress Senators, Us Congress Term, Us Congress Term Limits, Us Congress Twitter, Us Congress Tour, Us Congress Today, Us Congress Twitter Accounts, Us Congress Texas, Us Congress Telephone Number, Us Congress Transportation Committee, Us Congress Trump, Us Congress Utah, Us Congress Updates, Us Congress United Airlines, Us Congress Up For Reelection 2018, Us Congress Upcoming Votes, Us Congress Upper House, Us Congress Ukraine, Us Congress Ukraine Resolution, Us Congress Vs Uk Parliament, Us Congress Makeup, Us Congress Voting Record, Us Congress Vietnam War, Us Congress Voting, Us Congress Vs Senate, Us Congress Visit, Us Congress Venezuela, Us Congress Voting Schedule, Us Congress Virginia, Us Congress Video, Us Congress Vote Today, Us Congress Wiki, Us Congress Website, Us Congress Whip, Us Congress Washington Dc, Us Congress Wisconsin, Us Congresswoman, Us Congress Work Schedule, Us Congress War, Us Congress Worksheet, Us Congress Work Days, Us Congress Amendment Xv, Xkcd Us Congress, Us Congress Youtube, Us Congress Yemen, Us Congress Yearly Salary, Us Congress Your Senators, Us Congress Years Of Service, Us Congress Youngest, Us Congress Years, Us Youth Congress, Us Congress New York, Us Congress New York Times, Us Congress Zip Code, Us Congress Zionist, Us Congress Zombie, Us Congress Members By Zip Code, Zinke Us Congress, Zte Us Congress, Us Congress Zika Virus, Tax Haven Countries, Tax Haven Definition, Tax Haven Island, Tax Haven States, Tax Haven Countries 2017, Tax Haven Delaware, Tax Haven Puerto Rico, Tax Haven Usa, Tax Haven Legislation, Tax Haven Banks, Tax Haven Abuses The Enablers The Tools And Secrecy, Tax Haven Apple, Tax Haven Africa, Tax Haven Adalah, Tax Haven Arncliffe, Tax Haven Australia, Tax Haven Advantages, Tax Haven Accounts, Tax Haven Asia, Tax Haven Andorra, Tax Haven Banks, Tax Haven Bahamas, Tax Haven Blacklist, Tax Haven Benefits, Tax Haven Banks And U.s. Tax Compliance, Tax Haven Bermuda, Tax Haven Belize, Tax Haven Business, Tax Haven Britain, Tax Haven British Virgin Islands, Tax Haven Countries, Tax Haven Countries 2017, Tax Haven Cayman Islands, Tax Haven Countries In Asia, Tax Haven Countries In Europe, Tax Haven Caribbean, Tax Haven Countries 2016, Tax Haven Country Adalah, Tax Haven Countries Meaning, Tax Haven Countries For India, Tax Haven Definition, Tax Haven Delaware, Tax Haven Documentary, Tax Haven Definition Oecd, Tax Haven Define, Tax Haven Dubai, Tax Haven Disadvantages, Tax Haven Dissertation, Tax Haven Di Indonesia, Tax Haven Delaware Usa, Tax Haven Europe, Tax Haven Examples, Tax Haven Explained, Tax Haven Ethics, Tax Haven Essay, Tax Haven Economy, Tax Haven European Union, Tax Haven England, Tax Haven Effects, Tax Haven Explanation, Tax Haven For Individuals, Tax Haven For Us Citizens, Tax Haven Features, Tax Haven For Indian Companies, Tax Haven For Companies, Tax Haven For Internet Business, Tax Haven France, Tax Haven For Dummies, Tax Haven For Uk Citizens, Tax Haven Facts, Tax Haven Gibraltar, Tax Haven Guernsey, Tax Haven Germany, Tax Haven Gr, Tax Haven Gktoday, Tax Haven Game, Tax Haven Grey List, Tax Haven Guide, Tax Haven Good Or Bad, Tax Haven Google, Tax Haven Hot Springs, Tax Haven Hong Kong, Tax Haven History, Tax Haven How Does It Work, Tax Haven Holland, Tax Haven Or Tax Haven, Tax Haven How To, Tax Haven Hungary, Tax Haven Meaning In Hindi, Cayman Islands Tax Haven History, Tax Haven Island, Tax Haven In Europe, Tax Haven Ireland, Tax Haven In Usa, Tax Haven In The Caribbean, Tax Haven Irs, Tax Haven In The Us, Tax Haven In Spain, Tax Haven Investopedia, Tax Haven Islands List, Tax Haven Jurisdictions, Tax Haven Jersey, Tax Haven Journal, Tax Haven Japan, Tax Haven Jobs, Tax Haven Jokes, Tax Haven Jurisdictions Definition, Tax Haven Justification, Tax Haven Jurisdictions List, Tax Haven Journalist, Tax Haven Kloof, Tax Haven Karachi, Tax Haven Kenya, Tax Haven Kpmg, Tax Haven Hong Kong, Tax Haven St Kitts, Tax Haven United Kingdom, Sales Tax Haven Ks, Kazakhstan Tax Haven List, Kiribati Tax Haven, Tax Haven List, Tax Haven Legislation, Tax Haven List 2017, Tax Haven Legal, Tax Haven List 2016, Tax Haven Luxembourg, Tax Haven Meaning, Tax Haven Monaco, Tax Haven Map, Tax Haven Money Laundering, Tax Haven Meaning In Hindi, Tax Haven Malta, Tax Haven Malaysia, Tax Haven Meaning In Urdu, Tax Haven Meaning In Tamil, Tax Haven Mauritius, Tax Haven Nations, Tax Haven Nevada, Tax Haven New Zealand, Tax Haven News, Tax Haven Nz, Tax Haven Netherlands, Tax Haven Near Spain, Tax Haven Netherlands Antilles, Tax Haven Name List, Tax Haven Nevis, Tax Haven Oecd, Tax Haven Or Heaven, Tax Haven Oecd Definition, Tax Haven Or Tax Haven, Tax Haven Offshore Bank Accounts, Tax Haven Oxfam, Tax Haven Or Offshore Finance, Tax Haven Of The World, Tax Haven Origin, Tax Haven Offshore Financial Centers, Tax Haven Puerto Rico, Tax Haven Pros And Cons, Tax Haven Panama, Tax Haven Pdf, Tax Haven Ppt, Tax Haven Places, Tax Haven Problems, Tax Haven Pacific Islands, Tax Haven Passport, Tax Haven Pronunciation, Tax Haven Quotes, Tax Haven Quora, Tax Haven Qatar, Tax Haven Questions, Tax Haven Quotations, Quebecor Tax Haven, Quasi Tax Haven, Tax Haven Report, Tax Haven Reddit, Tax Haven Regulation, Tax Haven Rates, Tax Haven Ranking, Tax Haven Residency, Tax Haven Reno, Tax Haven Research Paper, Tax Haven Rules, Tax Haven Reform, Tax Haven States, Tax Haven Synonym, Tax Haven Scandal, Tax Haven Small Business, Tax Haven Statistics, Tax Haven Singapore, Tax Haven Seychelles, Tax Haven Spain, Tax Haven Status, Tax Haven South America, Tax Haven Tax Rates, Tax Haven Tax Evasion, Tax Haven Traduction, Tax Haven Theory, Tax Haven The Economist, Tax Haven The Netherlands, Tax Haven Thailand, Tax Haven Top, Best Tax Haven To Live In, Tax Haven In The Caribbean, Tax Haven Usa, Tax Haven Uk, Tax Haven Uae, Tax Haven Us States, Tax Haven Uk Citizen, Tax Haven Uruguay, Tax Haven Us Virgin Islands, Tax Haven Under Portuguese Law, Tax Haven Unethical, Tax Haven For Us Citizens, Tax Haven Vs Tax Shelter, Tax Haven Vanuatu, Tax Haven Virgin Islands, Tax Haven Video, Tax Haven Vs Transfer Pricing, Tax Haven Or Offshore Financial Centres, Tax Haven British Virgin Islands, Tax Haven Us Virgin Islands, Tax Haven St Vincent Grenadines, Tax Haven Vs Tax Haven, Tax Haven Wiki, Tax Haven World Map, Tax Haven Wyoming, Tax Haven Wales, Tax Haven Works, Tax Haven Wollerau, Tax Haven Website, Tax Haven Web Hosting, Tax Haven Whistleblower, Tax Haven Webster, Tax Haven Youtube, Tax Haven Yacht, Delaware Tax Haven New York Times, Your Democracy Tax Haven, Tax Haven Zug, Tax Haven Zones, Tax Haven Zucman, Tax Haven New Zealand, Zurich Tax Haven, Zero Tax Haven, Zambia Tax Haven, Tax Haven Free Zone, Tax Haven Sp. Z O.o, Tax Avoidance Definition, Tax Avoidance Strategies, Tax Avoidance Methods, Tax Avoidance Examples, Tax Avoidance Schemes, Tax Avoidance Vs Evasion, Tax Avoidance Transaction, Tax Avoidance Penalties, Tax Avoidance Techniques, Tax Avoidance Is Legal, Tax Avoidance And Ethics, Tax Avoidance And Geographic Earnings Disclosure, Tax Avoidance And Tax Evasion, Tax Avoidance Articles, Tax Avoidance And Tax Evasion Pdf, Tax Avoidance As A Sustainability Problem, Tax Avoidance Adalah, Tax Avoidance Australia, Tax Avoidance And Tax Evasion Difference, Tax Avoidance And Tax Evasion Uk, Tax Avoidance Bitcoin, Tax Avoidance Books, Tax Avoidance By Multinational Companies, Tax Avoidance By Multinationals, Tax Avoidance Benefits, Tax Avoidance By Country, Tax Avoidance By Corporations, Tax Avoidance Bbc, Tax Avoidance Brazil, Tax Avoidance Bill, Tax Avoidance Cases, Tax Avoidance Corporations, Tax Avoidance Court Cases, Tax Avoidance Countries, Tax Avoidance Companies List, Tax Avoidance Consequences, Tax Avoidance Canada, Tax Avoidance Companies, Tax Avoidance Companies List 2017, Tax Avoidance Case Law, Tax Avoidance Definition, Tax Avoidance Dissertation Topics, Tax Avoidance Dan Tax Evasion, Tax Avoidance Dissertation, Tax Avoidance Directive, Tax Avoidance Dissertation Uk, Tax Avoidance Disclosure, Tax Avoidance Di Indonesia, Tax Avoidance Dissertation Questions, Tax Avoidance Debate, Tax Avoidance Examples, Tax Avoidance Evasion, Tax Avoidance Ethics, Tax Avoidance Examples Uk, Tax Avoidance Eu, Tax Avoidance Essay, Tax Avoidance Evasion And Administration, Tax Avoidance Europe, Tax Avoidance Economics, Tax Avoidance Explained, Tax Avoidance For Dummies, Tax Avoidance For Individuals, Tax Avoidance For Small Businesses, Tax Avoidance For High Earners, Tax Avoidance Figures Uk, Tax Avoidance Film Schemes, Tax Avoidance Features, Tax Avoidance Forum, Tax Avoidance Fine, Tax Avoidance Footballers, Tax Avoidance Google, Tax Avoidance Germany, Tax Avoidance Globalisation, Tax Avoidance Guardian, Tax Avoidance Greece, Tax Avoidance Guide, Tax Avoidance Gaar, Tax Avoidance Government, Tax Avoidance Guernsey, Tax Avoidance Google Amazon Starbucks, Tax Avoidance Hmrc, Tax Avoidance Hotline, Tax Avoidance Hong Kong, Tax Avoidance History, Tax Avoidance Havens In Europe, Tax Avoidance Hsbc, Tax Avoidance How It Works, Tax Avoidance How To, Tax Avoidance Headlines, Tax Avoidance Havens, Tax Avoidance Is Legal, Tax Avoidance Irs, Tax Avoidance In The Us, Tax Avoidance In Retirement, Tax Avoidance Illegal, Tax Avoidance Investments, Tax Avoidance In India, Tax Avoidance Ireland, Tax Avoidance In The Uk, Tax Avoidance In Malaysia, Tax Avoidance Journal, Tax Avoidance Jail, Tax Avoidance Jokes, Tax Avoidance Journal Articles, Tax Avoidance Jersey, Tax Avoidance Journal Pdf, Tax Avoidance Jail Term, Tax Avoidance Japan, Tax Avoidance Judicial Review, Tax Avoidance Jimmy, Tax Avoidance Kenya, Tax Avoidance Kpmg, Tax Avoidance K2, Tax Avoidance Kahulugan, Tax Avoidance Keynes, Tax Avoidance Kidnapping, Tax Avoidance Hong Kong, Tax Avoidance Schemes K2, Tax Avoidance United Kingdom, Tax Avoidance Schemes Kenya, Tax Avoidance Loans, Tax Avoidance Laws, Tax Avoidance Legal, Tax Avoidance Legal Or Illegal, Tax Avoidance Legislation, Tax Avoidance Literature Review, Tax Avoidance Loopholes, Tax Avoidance Legality Vs Morality, Tax Avoidance Law Uk, Tax Avoidance Labour, Tax Avoidance Methods, Tax Avoidance Meaning, Tax Avoidance Malaysia, Tax Avoidance Measures, Tax Avoidance Money Laundering, Tax Avoidance Multinationals, Tax Avoidance Methods South Africa, Tax Avoidance Morality, Tax Avoidance Methods Uk, Tax Avoidance Malta, Tax Avoidance Nz, Tax Avoidance News, Tax Avoidance Notes, Tax Avoidance Netherlands, Tax Avoidance Nigeria, Tax Avoidance Newcastle, Tax Avoidance Number, Tax Avoidance Not Illegal, Tax Avoidance Not Punishable By Law, Tax Avoidance Ngo, Tax Avoidance Or Evasion, Tax Avoidance Oecd, Tax Avoidance Objectives, Tax Avoidance Offshore, Tax Avoidance On Rental Income, Tax Avoidance Options, Tax Avoidance On Redundancy Payments, Tax Avoidance Penalties, Tax Avoidance Pdf, Tax Avoidance Pros And Cons, Tax Avoidance Philippines, Tax Avoidance Ppt, Tax Avoidance Phone Scam, Tax Avoidance Provisions, Tax Avoidance Package, Tax Avoidance Pwc, Tax Avoidance Prison, Tax Avoidance Quotes, Tax Avoidance Questionnaire, Tax Avoidance Quote Judge, Tax Avoidance Questions, Tax Avoidance Queen’s Speech, Tax Avoidance Quizlet, Tax Avoidance Dissertation Questions, Cameron Tax Avoidance Quote, Tax Evasion And Avoidance Questions And Answers, Tax Avoidance And Audit Quality, Tax Avoidance Reddit, Tax Avoidance Reporting, Tax Avoidance Rules, Tax Avoidance Research Paper, Tax Avoidance Research, Tax Avoidance Rates By Country, Tax Avoidance Reasons, Tax Avoidance Real Estate, Tax Avoidance Research Proposal, Tax Avoidance Strategies, Tax Avoidance Schemes, Tax Avoidance Strategies Usa, Tax Avoidance Strategies Canada, Tax Avoidance Strategies For Small Business, Tax Avoidance Starbucks, Tax Avoidance Statistics Uk, Tax Avoidance Scams, Tax Avoidance South Africa, Tax Avoidance Solutions, Tax Avoidance Transaction, Tax Avoidance Techniques, Tax Avoidance Tax Evasion, Tax Avoidance Transfer Pricing, Tax Avoidance Trusts, Tax Avoidance Through Charity, Tax Avoidance Transactions Identified By The Irs, Tax Avoidance Taskforce, Tax Avoidance Tips, Tax Avoidance Thailand, Tax Avoidance Uk, Tax Avoidance Uk Cost, Tax Avoidance Uk Companies, Tax Avoidance Unethical, Tax Avoidance Usa, Tax Avoidance Us, Tax Avoidance Under Labour, Tax Avoidance Uk Report, Tax Avoidance Umbrella Companies, Tax Avoidance Uk Starbucks, Tax Avoidance Vs Evasion, Tax Avoidance Vs Tax Evasion Examples, Tax Avoidance Vs Tax Evasion Irs, Tax Avoidance Vs Tax Planning, Tax Avoidance Vs Benefit Fraud, Tax Avoidance Vs Tax Evasion Uk, Tax Avoidance Vs Tax Evasion Pdf, Tax Avoidance Vs Tax, Tax Avoidance Vs Tax Evasion Sars, Tax Avoidance Vs Tax Evasion Nz, Tax Avoidance Wiki, Tax Avoidance Ways, Tax Avoidance With Example, Tax Avoidance Whistleblowing, Tax Avoidance Worldwide, Tax Avoidance With Cross-border Hybrid Instruments, Tax Avoidance What Are The Rules, Tax Avoidance Working Abroad, Tax Avoidance Ways In India, Tax Avoidance Whistleblower Uk, Xerox Tax Avoidance, Tax Avoidance Youtube, Tax Avoidance Yahoo Answers, Yougov Tax Avoidance, Starbucks Tax Avoidance Youtube, Tax Avoidance New York Times, Tax Avoidance Per Year, Tax Avoidance Uk Per Year, Yahoo Tax Avoidance, Apple Tax Avoidance New York Times, Google Tax Avoidance Youtube, Tax Avoidance Zambia, Tax Avoidance Za, Tax Avoidance Zero Hedge, Tax Avoidance In Zimbabwe, Tax Avoidance New Zealand, Tax Avoidance Co.za, Tax Avoidance Cases New Zealand, Tax Evasion And Avoidance In Zimbabwe, Zara Tax Avoidance, Zavvi Tax Avoidance, Tax Evasion Felony, Tax Evasion Penalties, Tax Evasion Cases, Tax Evasion Meaning, Tax Evasion Jail Time, Tax Evasion Scams, Tax Evasion Meme, Tax Evasion Sentence, Tax Evasion Examples, Tax Evasion Law, Tax Evasion Actor, Tax Evasion Arrest, Tax Evasion And Fraud, Tax Evasion Articles, Tax Evasion Attorney, Tax Evasion And Tax Avoidance, Tax Evasion Amount, Tax Evasion Athletes, Tax Evasion Apple, Tax Evasion And Inequality, Tax Evasion By Country, Tax Evasion Business, Tax Evasion Bitcoin, Tax Evasion Books, Tax Evasion Business Owner, Tax Evasion Bail, Tax Evasion By Multinational Corporations, Tax Evasion Beer, Tax Evasion Bir, Tax Evasion By Companies, Tax Evasion Cases, Tax Evasion Charges, Tax Evasion Cases 2017, Tax Evasion Cases 2015, Tax Evasion Consequences, Tax Evasion Celebrities, Tax Evasion Court Cases, Tax Evasion Crime, Tax Evasion Call, Tax Evasion California, Tax Evasion Definition, Tax Evasion Department, Tax Evasion Department Of The Irs, Tax Evasion Definition Irs, Tax Evasion Define, Tax Evasion Defense, Tax Evasion Democracy 3, Tax Evasion Deportation, Tax Evasion Developing Countries, Tax Evasion Data, Tax Evasion Examples, Tax Evasion Elements, Tax Evasion Email Scam, Tax Evasion Essay, Tax Evasion Effects On Economy, Tax Evasion Examples Uk, Tax Evasion Examples In The Philippines, Tax Evasion Ethics, Tax Evasion Effects, Tax Evasion Eu, Tax Evasion Felony, Tax Evasion Fraud, Tax Evasion Fine, Tax Evasion Fraud Phone Call, Tax Evasion Form, Tax Evasion Famous Cases, Tax Evasion France, Tax Evasion Facts, Tax Evasion Famous, Tax Evasion Fbi, Tax Evasion Greece, Tax Evasion Game, Tax Evasion Gangster, Tax Evasion Green Card, Tax Evasion Germany, Tax Evasion Google, Tax Evasion Graph, Tax Evasion Gst, Tax Evasion Globally, Tax Evasion Gibraltar, Tax Evasion Hotline, Tax Evasion History, Tax Evasion How Many Years, Tax Evasion Help, Tax Evasion Hoax, Tax Evasion Hsbc, Tax Evasion How To Report, Tax Evasion Hotline Number, Tax Evasion Hawaii, Tax Evasion Hmrc, Tax Evasion Irs, Tax Evasion In Greece, Tax Evasion In The Us, Tax Evasion In Spanish, Tax Evasion In The United States, Tax Evasion In Italy, Tax Evasion In China, Tax Evasion In Spain, Tax Evasion In India, Tax Evasion Is A Felony, Tax Evasion Jail Time, Tax Evasion Jail, Tax Evasion Jersey Shore, Tax Evasion Jokes, Tax Evasion Jail Sentence, Tax Evasion Jail Time Uk, Tax Evasion Journal, Tax Evasion Japan, Tax Evasion Jersey, Tax Evasion Jail Time Canada, Tax Evasion Kenya, Tax Evasion Korea, Tax Evasion Kya Hai, Tax Evasion Kahulugan, Tax Evasion Kpmg, Tax Evasion Kindersley, Tax Evasion Kentucky, Tax Evasion Kelowna, Tax Evasion Uk, Tax Evasion Korea Times, Tax Evasion Law, Tax Evasion Lawyer, Tax Evasion Lawsuit, Tax Evasion Laws Us, Tax Evasion Leaving Country, Tax Evasion Legal, Tax Evasion Law Uk, Tax Evasion List, Tax Evasion Legislation, Tax Evasion Law Philippines, Tax Evasion Meaning, Tax Evasion Meme, Tax Evasion Mobster, Tax Evasion Money Laundering, Tax Evasion Mafia, Tax Evasion Movie, Tax Evasion Mexico, Tax Evasion Maximum Sentence, Tax Evasion Misdemeanor Or Felony, Tax Evasion Mn, Tax Evasion Number, Tax Evasion News, Tax Evasion Non Profit, Tax Evasion Ny, Tax Evasion Nj, Tax Evasion Nyc, Tax Evasion Nc, Tax Evasion News Articles, Tax Evasion Notification, Tax Evasion Nz, Tax Evasion Office, Tax Evasion Offshore, Tax Evasion Offshore Accounts, Tax Evasion Oklahoma, Tax Evasion On Rented Property, Tax Evasion Or Avoidance, Tax Evasion Offence, Tax Evasion Oecd, Tax Evasion Ontario, Tax Evasion Offences Uk, Tax Evasion Penalties, Tax Evasion Punishment, Tax Evasion Phone Call, Tax Evasion Prison Time, Tax Evasion Phone Call Scam, Tax Evasion Phone Scam, Tax Evasion Phone Number, Tax Evasion Punishment Us, Tax Evasion Penalties California, Tax Evasion Panama Papers, Tax Evasion Quotes, Tax Evasion Quizlet, Tax Evasion Questionnaire, Tax Evasion Quora, Tax Evasion Quebec, Tax Evasion Questions, Tax Evasion Qld, Tax Evasion Queen, Tax Evasion Queensland, Tax Evasion Questionnaire Pdf, Tax Evasion Report, Tax Evasion Red Flags, Tax Evasion Reddit, Tax Evasion Reward, Tax Evasion Rates By Country, Tax Evasion Robocall, Tax Evasion Restaurant, Tax Evasion Requirements, Tax Evasion Reporting Reward, Tax Evasion Rental Income, Tax Evasion Scams, Tax Evasion Sentence, Tax Evasion Statistics, Tax Evasion Statute, Tax Evasion Schemes, Tax Evasion Soccer, Tax Evasion Synonym, Tax Evasion Scam Call, Tax Evasion Spain, Tax Evasion Strategies, Tax Evasion The Situation, Tax Evasion Tips, Tax Evasion Tax Fraud, Tax Evasion Trophy, Tax Evasion Techniques, Tax Evasion Treaty, Tax Evasion The Game, Tax Evasion Tax Avoidance, Tax Evasion Threshold, Tax Evasion Telephone Scam, Tax Evasion Us, Tax Evasion Uk, Tax Evasion Usa, Tax Evasion Usa Penalty, Tax Evasion Urban Dictionary, Tax Evasion Us Penalty, Tax Evasion Uk Law, Tax Evasion Under Gst, Tax Evasion Uk Jail, Tax Evasion Uk Cost, Tax Evasion Vs Tax Avoidance, Tax Evasion Vs Tax Fraud, Tax Evasion And Fraud, Tax Evasion Voicemail Scam, Tax Evasion Vs Not Filing, Tax Evasion Virginia, Tax Evasion Vs Tax Avoidance Pdf, Tax Evasion Voicemail, Tax Evasion Vs Tax Avoidance Uk, Tax Evasion Vs Tax Avoidance Canada, Tax Evasion Whistleblower, Tax Evasion Warrant Scam, Tax Evasion Wesley, Tax Evasion Warrant, Tax Evasion Wiki, Tax Evasion With Bitcoin, Tax Evasion White Collar Crime, Tax Evasion Wisconsin, Tax Evasion Ways, Tax Evasion Worldwide, Tax Evasion Yakuza 0, Tax Evasion Youtube, Tax Evasion Yahoo Answers, Tax Evasion Can You Go To Prison, Tax Evasion New York, Tax Evasion Per Year, Tax Evasion New York Times, Tax Evasion 20 Years, Hsbc Tax Evasion Youtube, Tax Evasion New York State, Tax Evasion Zootopia, Tax Evasion Zambia, Tax Evasion Zimbabwe, Tax Evasion New Zealand, Glencore Tax Evasion Zambia, Tax Evasion In Zimbabwe Pdf, Tax Evasion Penalties New Zealand, Tax Evasion Cases In Zimbabwe, Reporting Tax Evasion New Zealand, Zawarski Tax Evasion
©BERNDPULCH.ORG - ABOVE TOP SECRET ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS - PUBLISHED AT RISK OF DEATH - THE VOICE OF FREEDOM - NO FAIRY TALES - NO GATES OR SOROS FUNDING - NO PROJECT SYNDICATE - NO RELOTIUS - NO HITLER DIARIES - PURE BLOOD 
You must be logged in to post a comment.