BERND PULCH.ORG – THE ONLY MEDIA WITH THE LICENSE TO SPY -YOU WILL SEE GOD IN ACTION – Censored and surpressed by Google – TOXDAT, STASI Liste, STASI Schläfer Liste, KGB Liste, BDVP Liste, DDR POLIZEI Liste, GOMOPA4ALL -THE INDEPENDENT VOICE OF FREEDOM – NO MORE FAIRY TALES – NO GATES OR SOROS FUNDING – NO PROJECT SYNDICATE – SCHLUSS MIT MÄRCHENSTUNDE – Kein Relotius – Keine Hitler-Tagebücher – Keine Peanuts – Great Reset, GOMOPA4KIDS-Pädophilen-Netzwerk, GOMOPA Opfer Liste, GOMOPA Täter, NO FAIRY TALES – TOXDAT, STASI List, STASI SLEEPER List, KGB List, BDVP List, STASI Names A-Z, DDR-EAST GERMAN POLICE List, Offshore List, WEF Lists, Leaks Lists, GOMOPA4KIDS-Pedophiles-Network, GOMOPA Victims List, GOMOPA Offender Names, Stalin, Berija, Mao, Xi, Kim, Pol Pot, Putin, Erich Mielke, Ehrenfried Stelzer, Monika Mucha, Michèle Mucha, Jochen Resch, Alexander Schalck-Golodkowski, Kim Philby, Wolfgang Schnur, IM Erika, Gregor Gysi, Gerhard Schroeder, Matthias Warnig, Friedhelm Laschütza, Angela Merkel, William Borm, Adolf Kanter, Udo Albrecht, Gerhard Baumann, Gert Caden, Andreas Lorch, Anette Lorch, Britta Lorch, Catrin Lorch, Hermann Simm, Mischa Wolf, Peter Ehlers, Axel Hilpert, Thomas Promny, Jan Mucha, Klaus Croissant, Isabell Colonius, Sven Schmidt / Eagle IT, Gerd Löffler, Detlev K. Manthey, Dieter Feuerstein, Klaus-Dieter Maurischat, Beate & Thomas Porten, Sonja Lüneburg, Rainer Rupp, Christel & Günter Guillaume – The One And Only Website With The License To Spy ! Donations: www.berndpulch.org/donations Warning: Only this facebook account of me is legit:https://m.facebook.com/bernd.pulch/ The others are faked by the STASI Desperados as well as berndpulch.com
Dear readers,
it is so riduculous.
There is a new fake entry in serial betrayer’s Maurischat blog “”the shit house fly
(in German language: “Die Scheisshausfliege”)”
I can not stop laughing
He just copied our articles and the press release of Meridian Capital and exchanged names.
Oh what a rotten shit fly he truly is
Have a great week
best regards
Magister Bernd Pulch
Liebe Leser,
nachstehend publiziere ich Material, das unserer Redaktion in Bezug auf die STASI-Mörder-Bande von STASI-Opfern zugespielt wurde.
Den vollen Text lesen Sie unter
http://sjb-fonds-opfer.com/?p=13110
und unter
http://bennewirtz-opfer.com/?p=9847
Mehr Infos unter
http://sjb-fonds-opfer.com/?page_id=11764
Herzlichst Ihr
Magister Bernd Pulch
ist am besten mit dem Licht der
Öffentlichkeit zu begegnen.“
see more info at http://www.victims-opfer.com
Die Liste wurde bereits früher hier publiziert:
Vom “Stasiopfer”-Angebot führt ein Link zu einer Website in den USA (www.jya.com), die sich auch mit den Praktiken von Geheimdiensten beschäftigt. Dort findet sich die “Fipro-Liste”, das detaillierte “Finanzprojekt” der Stasi, angefertigt in den letzten Tagen der DDR, um die Rentenansprüche der rund 100 000 hauptamtlichen Mitarbeiter des MfS auch nach dem Zusammenbruch des Systems belegen zu können. Die “Fipro-Liste” ist seit langem bekannt und diente Anfang der neunziger Jahre etwa zur Identifizierung der so genannten OibE – Offiziere im besonderen Einsatz. Diese Liste „Offiziere im besonderen Einsatz“im Jahre 1991 erschien in der “taz. Die Echtheit kann beim BStU überprüft werden.
Siehe u.a. http://www.spiegel.de/spiegel/print/d-22539439.html
Auf Druck ehemaliger STASI-Leute und Ihrer Genossen wurde die Liste aus dem Verkehr gezogen.
Hier ist sie wieder:
Diese Liste beinhaltet die Namen von 90.598 Mitarbeitern des Ministeriums für Staatssicherheit der DDR. Die Liste ist nicht vollständig. Insbesondere Mitarbeiter der Führungsebene sind nicht enthalten.
This is a list of 90.598 members of the secret police of East Germany (Ministry for State Security), the list isn’t complete, because the most of the high Officiers lieke Colonel and higher have destroyed the personal Informations in the last days of Eastern Germany.
| Listen der Stasimitarbeiter-hier findest Du sie! Was bedeuten die Zahlen? |
| 1.Listen der Stasi-Diensteinheiten! Bem.:hier kannst du die Nr.(6-stellig) der Dienststellen heraussuchen. 2.Liste der Stasi-Mitarbeiter (Hauptamtlich) Bem.:Hoffentlich hast Du einen guten Rechner, denn die Liste ist erschreckend lang. Die ersten 6 Ziffern sind das Geburtsdatum + die nächsten 6 Ziffern = Dienstausweisnummer! Die zwei Ziffern hinter dem Geburtsdatum geben das Geschlecht an: 41 und 42 = Männlich, 51 und 52 = Weiblich! Wichtig für suchen und finden, sind die sechs Ziffern in den Semikolon vor den Namen: z.B. ;07;00;44; ! Das ist die Nummer der Dienststelle ! Also du suchst in der Liste der Dienststellen, die Nummer der Dienststelle, die Dich interessiert. Damit gehst Du in die Liste der Mitarbeiter und suchst Dir alle Mitarbeiter der entsprechenden Dienststelle heraus. Ich habe das für mein Wohnort getan und so alle Mitarbeiter gefunden. Ob die Liste Vollständig ist kann ich nicht einschätzen, aber zumindest er/kannte ich einige Exverräter vom Namen her. 3.Liste der OibE (Offiziere im besonderen Einsatz) |
Hiermit stelle ich eine Liste der Stasi-Mitarbeiter mit Ihrem Klarnamen zum Download isn Internet.
Die Liste ist ab sofort auch auf vielen anderen Webseiten zu finden unter anderem.
http://www.sjb-fonds-opfer.com
(Investment Magazin, Investment, Das Investment) DAS ORIGINAL – In der ZDF-Dokumention „Sonderauftrag Mord. Die Geheimnisse der Stasi“Der tödliche Arm der DDR werden die tödlichen Taten der Stasi um den „Ersten Kriminologen der DDR“, Ehrenfried Stelzer, enthüllt.
„Focus“ schreibt : „In der Reportage „Sonderauftrag Mord“ beleuchten ZDF-Filmemacher die geheimnisvollsten Missionen der geheimnisvollsten Behörde der ehemaligen DDR: die Tötungseinsätze des Ministeriums für Staatssicherheit. Genauer gesagt: die vermeintlichen Tötungseinsätze. Denn Genaues weiß man (fast) nicht. Zum tödlichen Treiben der Stasi gibt es vor allem Mutmaßungen und selten wirklich belastbare Beweise. Was die Sache nur umso mysteriöser und noch spannender macht… Dass dies nicht alles nur Hirngespinste sind, dokumentiert mindestens ein Fall, in dem ein Mordauftrag der Stasi gerichtsfest belegt ist. Wolfgang Welsch war in der DDR Schauspieler und Regimegegner. Sieben Jahre verbrachte er in Gefängnissen, bevor die BRD ihn freikaufte. Im Westen baute Welsch eine Fluchthilfeorganisation auf, die vielen DDR-Bürgern ein Entkommen aus dem real existierenden Drangsalismus ermöglichte – ihn selbst aber erst recht zum Feind der Stasi stempelte.
Die Ost-Geheimen setzten falsche Freunde auf ihn an. Peter H. einer von ihnen, begleitete Welsch mit Frau und Kind im Urlaub nach Israel. Dort mischte der Agent Rattengift ins Essen, was Welsch beinahe das Leben kostete. Im sogenannten Bulettenprozess wurde dieser Fall konkret juristisch aufgearbeitet. Und weil dies so ist, entspringt das Thema dieser guten und eindrucksvoll inszenierten ZDF-Dokumentation leider nicht einer blühenden Phantasie. Sondern gehört ins gesamtdeutsche Geschichtsbuch.“
Das Gift hat Methode bei den Stasi-Mördern.
Zuerst nahm der aus der DDR geflohene Fußballlehrer Jörg Berger nur ein Kribbeln in den Zehen wahr, dann in den ganzen Füßen und Händen. Hinzu kamen Fieber, Übelkeit und ein allgemeines Schwächegefühl. Hatte die Stasi ihn vergiftet?
Als er seine Gliedmaßen kaum noch spürte und nicht mehr laufen konnte, musste Jörg Berger für lange Zeit seinen Beruf aufgeben. Eine Erklärung für seine schwere Krankheit im Jahr 1986 hatte der populäre Trainer Berger viele Jahre lang nicht, genauso wenig konnte er sich erklären, warum sich an seinem neuen Auto plötzlich ein Rad löste.
“Frisierte” Akten
Erst als er nach der Wende seine Stasi-Akten sichtete, kam ihm ein schrecklicher Verdacht: Steckte der DDR-Geheimdienst hinter seiner Krankheit und dem mysteriösen Autounfall? Wollte man ihn “nur” einschüchtern? Oder gab es gar einen “offiziellen” Tötungsplan?
Wie weit ist die Stasi gegangen? Führende Stasi-Offiziere bestreiten bis heute Morde im Auftrag des Ministeriums für Staatssicherheit, der Nachweis ist schwierig. Viele Akten wurden kurz vor der Wende “frisiert”, brisantes Material hektisch vernichtet. Doch die Indizienkette, die Mordabsichten plausibel erscheinen lässt, wird immer dichter. Jörg Berger wird die Wahrheit nie erfahren. Im Juni dieses Jahres ist er an Krebs gestorben.
In den Osten entführt
Die bisherigen Erkenntnisse führen in die 1950er Jahre zurück, als die Stasi “Verräter” aus dem Westen in den Osten entführen ließ. Manche wurden nach Schauprozessen hingerichtet, andere blieben für immer verschwunden. Nach dem Bau der Mauer bildete die Stasi dann “Kämpfer” aus, die auf einem geheimen Truppenübungsplatz das Liquidieren von Menschen übten.
Die Stasi experimentierte auch mit Sprengstoff. Für Übungszwecke wird ein Wartburg in die Luft gejagt (nachgestellte Spielszene). Wurde diese Erfahrungen auch bei Anschlägen im Westen “angewandt?”
In der Stasiunterlagenbehörde in Berlin finden sich konkrete Mordplanungen: Der geflohene Grenzoffizier Rudi Thurow sollte 1963 mit einem 1.000 Gramm schweren Hammer erschlagen werden, bei einem anderen Fahnenflüchtigen plante die Stasi, einen Sprengsatz unter dem Sattel seines Mopeds zu montieren.
Zitat
„Das Liquidieren beinhaltet die physische Vernichtung von Einzelpersonen oder von Personengruppen. Erreichbar durch: Das Erschießen, Erstechen, Verbrennen, Zersprengen, Strangulieren, Erschlagen, Vergiften, Ersticken.“
BStU: Ausbildungsbuch des MfS, 1974
Ex-Stasimitarbeiter berichten
Ab den 1970er Jahren wurden Mordplanungen nicht mehr aufgeschrieben – es gab sie aber dennoch. Gegenüber dem ZDF berichtet ein ehemaliger MfS-Mitarbeiter von Plänen, den geflohenen Geheimdienstagenten Werner Stiller zu ermorden, und in einem anderen Fall gibt es ein Geständnis eines ehemaligen MfS-Offiziers, der den Auftrag hatte, einen Fluchthelfer zu vergiften.
Noch immer kommen Neuigkeiten ans Licht: So hat ein Stasi-Spitzel Anfang dieses Jahres bestätigt, dass es tatsächlich Mordpläne gegen den geflohenen Fußballspieler Lutz Eigendorf gab.
Die ZDF-Dokumentation “Sonderauftrag Mord” widerlegt die Legende der Stasiführung, das MfS hätte mit Auftragsmorden nichts zu tun. Zeugenaussagen, Archivfunde und investigative Recherchen beweisen, mit welch tödlicher Energie die Stasi gegen “Feinde” des DDR-Regimes vorgegangen ist. Der verstorbene Fußballtrainer Jörg Berger gab für diese ZDF-Produktion sein letztes großes Interview.
Auch heute noch gehen die alten Seilschaften der Stasi, wie der „NACHRICHTENDIENST“ „GoMoPa“ mit Stasi-Methoen vor. Das beweisen auch ihre Droh-Emails gegen unsere Journalisten (siehe berndpulch.org).
Bei der gezielten Unterwanderung der westdeutschen Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft wird auch heute noch mit der „Operativen Psychologie“ der Stasi gearbeitet. Die alten Stasi-Schergen sind immer noch aktiv, wie das Beispiel des millionenfachen Dioxin-Vergifters und Stasi-Mannes Siegfried Siewert zeigt. Sein Namensvetter Stasi-Mann „Siegfried Sievert“ ist in Wirklichkeit der vorbestrafte Serienbetrüger Klaus Maurischat.
Deep Throat, Berlin: „Für“GoMoPa“ und deren alte Stasi-Kader wie dem psychotischen Peter Ehlers ist jedes Mittel recht, das in ihrem Stasi-Arsenal lagert, um Gegner auszuschalten und die macht im Finanzmarkt zu übernehmen.“
Wie die millionenfache DiOXIN-Vergiftung zeigt schrecken die Stasi-Seilschaften vor nichts zurück, wenn sie glauben, es sei ihren dubiosen Zielen nützlich. Ein erschütterndes Beispiel hierfür ist auch das Schicksal des Stasi-Opfers Joerg Berger.
Joerg Berger wurde von der Stasi mit Arsen und Blei vergiftet. In seiner Biographie schildert, der wohl auch deswegen viel zu früh verstorbenen Fussball-Trainer Jörg Berger die Tatumstände.
„Meine zwei Halbzeiten“ – so heißt seine Biographie.
Zu seiner Biographie sagt Berger: „Es ist genau der richtige Zeitpunkt, meine deutsch-deutsche Geschichte aufzuschreiben. Weil ich jetzt die Hälfte meines Lebens im Osten und die andere Hälfte im Westen gelebt habe.“
Es geht um seine spektakuläre Flucht 1979 aus der DDR, seine Krebs-Erkrankung, sein Leben als Fußball-Retter.
Wie die Stasi ihn im Westen jagte.
Seit ich 1979 in den Westen geflohen war, verfolgte ich aufmerksam wie Lutz Eigendorf sich verhielt, der eine Woche vor mir Republikflucht begangen hatte. Er trat sehr provokativ auf, besonders im Fernsehen, kritisierte den Staat drüben massiv, so dass ich mich fragte, wie lange sich die Stasi das gefallen lassen würde.
Ich hatte ihn gewarnt: „Mensch, Lutz, hör auf mit diesem Quatsch. Wenn deine alte Mannschaft Dynamo in Hamburg spielt, dann geh nicht zu deinen ehemaligen Kollegen ins Hotel oder an die Bar, nur um ihnen zu zeigen, wie gut es dir im Westen geht.“
Eigendorf, der sicher einer der talentiertesten von den geflüchteten DDR-Spielern war, zeigte keine Einsicht, wollte keinen Rat annehmen.
Als er am 5. März 1983 einen Autounfall hatte, bei dem er lebensgefährlich verletzt wurde und zwei Tage später starb, konnte ich das nur in einem Zusammenhang mit seinem provokanten Verhalten sehen. Die Obduktion ergab, dass er einen hohen Alkoholgehalt im Blut hatte (2,2 Promille/ d.Red.), am Abend vorher soll er aber laut Aussagen von Vereinskollegen nur wenig getrunken haben.
Eigendorf wurde von der Stasi verblitzt.
Heute, nach über 25 Jahren, spricht vieles für einen Stasi-Mord. Einen absoluten Beweis gibt es jedoch nicht. Neue Untersuchungen legen nahe, dass die Stasi Lutz möglicherweise heimlich ein pupillenerweiterndes Mittel verabreicht hat, um ihn gezielt zu blenden. In seinen Stasiakten steht „Eigendorf verblitzt“.
Von seinem Unfall-Tag an ließ ich regelmäßig mein Auto bei verschiedenen Werkstätten überprüfen. Plötzlich fielen mir auch einige merkwürdige Vorfälle wieder ein. Einmal hatte sich bei Tempo 160 ein Rad gelöst, mehrmals waren meine Reifen zerstochen worden. Jetzt konnte ich mir einen Reim darauf machen. Ich hatte eine Ahnung davon bekommen, wie weit das MfS (Ministerium für Staatssicherheit, die Red.) gehen konnte.
Nur mit Gewalt und Drogen hätte man mich in die DDR zurückgekriegt
Am 11. Oktober 1984 rief mich völlig überraschend Bernd Stange von einem Hotel in Luxemburg an. Dort bereitete er als Fußball-Nationaltrainer der DDR seine Mannschaft auf ein WM-Quali-Spiel vor. (…) Eigentlich hätte mich diese Kontaktaufnahme nachdenklich stimmen können, doch mir kam dergleichen nicht in den Sinn.
Was ich erst durch das Buch „Trainer zwischen den Welten“ von Heiko Mallwitz erfuhr: die Staatssicherheit hatte die Absicht, mich mit Stanges Hilfe in die DDR zurückzuführen, besser gesagt, zu entführen. Ich frage mich das auch noch heute, wie man das bewerkstellige wollte. Rhetorisch war Stange gut, aber so gut, dass er mich mit Worten dazu hätte bringen können, freiwillig nach drüben zurückzugehen – nein, das war nicht vorstellbar. Also blieben, in meiner Schlussfolgerung nur Gewalt und Drogen.
Jörg Berger wurde am 13. Oktober 1944 in Gotenhafen bei Danzig geboren. Seine Mutter floh mit ihm im Januar 1945 vor der herannahenden Roten Armee, verzichtete im letzten Moment auf die Reise mit der „Wilhelm Gustloff“. Ihr Glück. Das Schiff wurde versenkt (9000 Tote).
Seine Flucht, seine Klubs, seine Erfolge Jörg Berger wurde am 13. Oktober 1944 in Gotenhafen bei Danzig geboren. Seine Mutter floh mit ihm im Januar 1945 vor der herannahenden Roten Armee, verzichtete im letzten Moment auf die Reise mit der „Wilhelm Gustloff“. Ihr Glück. Das Schiff wurde versenkt (9000 Tote).Seine Flucht, seine Klubs, seine Erfolge Er wuchs in Leipzig auf, wurde Jugend-Nationalspieler der DDR, spielte für Lok Leipzig.Seine Flucht, seine Klubs, seine Erfolge 1972 erster Trainer-Job bei Carl Zeiss Jena (mit Hans Meyer), später der B-Jugendauswahl der DDR.Seine Flucht, seine Klubs, seine Erfolge 1979 Flucht bei einem Länderspiel in Jugoslawien.Seine Flucht, seine Klubs, seine Erfolge 12 Klubs als Trainer (Düsseldorf, Kassel, Hannover, SC Freiburg, Frankfurt, Köln, Schalke, Basel/Schweiz, Karlsruhe, noch mal Frankfurt, Bursaspor/Türkei, Aachen, Rostock).Seine Flucht, seine Klubs, seine Erfolge Größte Erfolge: Last-Minute-Rettung mit Frankfurt (1999), Pokalfinale mit Aachen (2004).
1 von 6
Meine Gliedmaßen waren wie tot.
1986 war ich vom Zweitligisten Hessen Kassel zum Erstligisten Hannover gewechselt. Das war etwas, was die Stasi kaum gewollt haben konnte. Seitdem stand ich noch mehr in den Schlagzeilen.
Zu diesem Zeitpunkt nahm ich ein Kribbeln wahr, zuerst in der linken Großzehe, dann insgesamt in den Füßen und Händen. Hinzu kam Fieber, Übelkeit und ein allgemeines Schwächegefühl. Ich dachte, ich hätte mir einen Virus eingefangen oder vielleicht zu viel Stress.
Das Kribbeln hörte nicht auf, wurde von Tag zu Tag schlimmer. Meine Gliedmaßen spürte ich schließlich kaum noch, alles war taub, wie tot. Erst als ich nicht mehr laufen konnte, suchte ich einen Spezialisten auf.
Eine Untersuchung nach der anderen wurde unternommen – doch eine zufriedenstellende Erklärung fand sich nicht.
Trotzdem ließ mich fortan das diffuse Gefühl nicht mehr los, dass hinter dieser Krankheit vielleicht doch etwas anderes steckte als eine körperliche oder seelische Ursache.
Blei- und Arsenverbindungen wurden mir ins Essen oder Trinken getan.
Nach der Wende forderte man mich auf, meine Krankenakten an Professor Dr. Wolfgang Eisenmenger zu schicken, tätig am Institut für Rechtsmedizin der Münchner Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität. Er kam zu dem Ergebnis, dass es sich aufgrund der darin beschriebenen Symptome wahrscheinlich nicht um eine Viruserkrankung, sondern um eine Vergiftung gehandelt habe. Er konkretisierte dies auch noch in Hinsicht auf eine Schwermetallvergiftung aus der Gruppe der Blei- und Arsenverbindungen.
Die Stasi-Akten geben darüber keine klaren Auskünfte. Das einzige, was aus den Akten selber hervorgeht, ist, dass in der Zeit „agressives Verhalten gegenüber dem Feindbild Berger“ angesagt war. In meiner Lesart: Es ging ihnen bei mir nicht gerade um Mord, sondern darum, mich beruflich außer Gefecht zu setzen. Nicht umsonst hatte man mir wohl ein Gift gegeben, das Lähmungserscheinungen auslöst. Dennoch: In zu hoher Dosierung hätte es meine Gliedmaßen absterben lassen, aber auch zum Tode führen können. Dann wäre es doch ein Auftragsmord gewesen. Mit großer Wahrscheinlichkeit hat mir jemand das Mittel in ein Getränk oder ins Essen getan. Ich kann von Glück sagen, dass ich nicht Lutz Eigendorfs Schicksal teilte.
Ich kann Stange nicht verzeihen.
Ein Einblick in meine Stasiakten konnte Aufschluss darüber geben, wer Freund und wer Feind war. Insgesamt zählte ich 21 regelmäßig auftretende offizielle Informelle Mitarbeiter, die man auf mich angesetzt hatte. Davon neun im Osten. Erschreckend war, schwarz auf weiß zu lesen, wie nah die Stasi im Westen an mir dran war. Das Schlimmste jedoch war folgende Gewissheit: Zwei mir nahestehende Menschen hatten mich verraten. Rolf G. (ein Freund, mit dem Berger Ski gefahren ist und zeltete, die Red.) und Bernd Stange.
Stange hat denunziert und verraten, Menschen, die ihm nahestanden, möglicherweise in Gefahr gebracht, um daraus persönliche Vorteile zu ziehen. Dadurch war er wohl auch DDR-Nationaltrainer geworden.
Beiden kann ich nicht verzeihen. Denn die Enttäuschung, von zwei Freunden verraten worden zu sein, belastet mich noch heute.“
Informant: Wie die Stasi die Rentenkasse des „Klassenfeindes“ platt machen will
Ein Informant der SJB-GoMoPa-Opfer spielte brisantes Material zu: „Wie die Stasi ihre eigene Republikflucht plante und durchführte oder Wie machen wir dem Klassenfeind seine Rentenkasse “platt”.
Auf über 30 Seiten wir die Unterwanderung der BRD durch die Stasi in diesem internen Bericht aus dem Jahre 1989 detailliert darlegt. Den Originalbericht finden Sie unter http://sjb-fonds-opfer.com/?p=12919
Vor allem die deutschen Rentenkassen, Stiftungen, Vermögensverwalter sollten so unterwandert werden. Im selben Jahr 1989 gründet Gerd-Wilhelm Bennewirtz SJB.
Zitat: „„Wir saßen unter einem Apfelbaum und beschlossen, es für ein Jahr zu versuchen. Mehr als schief gehen konnte es nicht“, erinnert sich Bennewirtz.“ 1989 ist auch das erste Jahr in Peter Ehlers Xing-Biographie. Auf kress.de, dem who is who der Medienbranche hat er keine Angaben – weil sie keiner Überprüfung Stand halten wie im fall des Stasi-Agenten Maurischat.
1989 war auch der Startpunkt für viel Stasi-Agenten „rüberzumachen – 1989 das Jahr der Wende.
Der „Spiegel“ schreibt: „Die Inoffiziellen Mitarbeiter (IM) wurden noch 1989 aus der DDR in den Westen geschickt.“
Zitat in Focus“: „Der Historiker Hubertus Knabe glaubt, dass die Gesellschaft im Westen intensiver als bisher angenommen von der Stasi beeinflusst war
FOCUS: In Ihrem Buch behaupten Sie, der Westen sei von der Stasi gelenkt und unterwandert gewesen. Muss die Geschichte der Bundesrepublik neu geschrieben werden?
Knabe: Sie muss neu geschrieben werden in Hinblick auf die Aktivitäten des DDR-Staatssicherheitsdienstes. Die Zeitgeschichtsforschung hat diese konspirative Dimension westdeutscher Vergangenheit bisher mit Schweigen übergangen. Doch egal, ob es um Politiker von FDP oder Grünen, die Friedensbewegung oder die 68er- Studentenrevolte geht – die Stasi hatte immer einen Fuß in der Tür.
FOCUS: War die Arbeit des MfS tatsächlich so effektiv? Ihr Kollege Helmut Müller-Enbergs konstatiert, Aufwand und Ergebnis der Stasi-Spionage hätten nicht selten in krassem Missverhältnis gestanden.
Knabe: Sicher hat es seitens der Stasi auch Wunschdenken über ihren Einfluss im Westen gegeben. Aber die Intensität der Unterwanderung ist erschreckend. Acht Bundestagsabgeordnete hatten MfS-Kontakte. Die Liste der als Informanten geführten Politiker reicht vom Berliner SDS-Sekretär Walter Barthel bis zum deutschlandpolitischen Sprecher der Grünen, Dirk Schneider. Mit ihrer Hilfe hatte es die DDR-Führung bis 1989 geschafft, im demokratischen Nachbarstaat zunehmend Akzeptanz zu finden bis hin zur Quasi-Anerkennung durch die Regierung.“
Zitatende
Der Niedergang der entkräfteten SED zog auch den Niedergang des MfS nach sich. Nicht zuletzt deshalb vermochte sich die Staatssicherheit gegenüber dem drohenden Zusammenbruch nicht zu wehren. Während des Umbruchs in der DDR richtete sich der Zorn weiter Kreise in der Bevölkerung maßgeblich gegen das MfS, das den Unterdrückungsapparat symbolisierte. Bei Demonstrationen wurde die Auflösung des MfS gefordert. E. Krenz, der Nachfolger Honeckers, wollte noch im November 1989 ein Gesetz über die Befugnisse des MfS erarbeiten lassen. Ministerpräsident H. Modrow ersetzte im November 1989 das MfS durch ein “Amt für Nationale Sicherheit”. Diese Nachfolgeorganisation wurde auf Druck des “Runden Tisches” durch einen Beschluss des Ministerrates im Dezember 1989 aufgelöst, wenngleich einzelne Strukturen fortbestanden – etwa bei der Beseitigung von Unterlagen. Die geplante Einrichtung eines “Verfassungsschutzes der DDR” und eines “Nachrichtendienstes der DDR” unterblieb nicht zuletzt aufgrund der Standhaftigkeit der Bürgerbewegungen und Bürgerkomitees. Der Sturm auf die Zentrale des MfS in der Normannenstraße am 15.1.1990 dürfte maßgeblich durch die Staatssicherheit inszeniert gewesen sein. Unter der Regierung de Maizière erfolgten weitere Maßnahmen zur Auflösung der Organe der Staatssicherheit. Als die DDR der BRD beitrat, war das MfS aufgelöst – ungeachtet des Fortwirkens entsprechender “Seilschaften”.
Diese Seilschaften benutzen und benutzen ihre alten Stasi-Methoden weiter zur Unterwanderung der deutschen Wirtschaft. Dies wird besonders deutlich an dem Versuch des Stasi-Obersten Ehrenfried Stelzer mit Ex-Verfassungsschutz Chef Hellenroich ein gemeinsames „Sicherheits-Unternehmen“ zu gründen sowie in den Aktivitäten der „GoMoPa“.
Deep Throat, Berlin: „Aus diesem Stasi-Umfeld“ der alten Seilschaften kommen die „GoMoPa“-Leute, aber auch der Ex-Stasi-Kader mit dem Tarnnamne „Peter Exxxx“ (anonymisiert), der heute noch mit Stasi-Methoden der „Operativen Psychologie“ arbeitet.
(Investment Magazin, Investment, Das Investment) DAS ORIGINAL – „Die Festnahme des Herrn Klaus Maurischat ist ein ausschlaggebender Moment, anders gesagt eine „Wende um 180 Grad” für ihn persönlich. Es bedeutet aber auch den „Anfang vom Ende“ für seine Mitarbeiter, für die Internetservices, Bloggers, die mit GOMOPA so gerne und ohne Widerspruch zusammengearbeitet hatten. Es unterliegt keinem Zweifel, dass die Festnahme von Herrn Klaus Maurischat nur die Spitze des „Eisbergs” ist“, so Meridian Capital, die von Maurischat und GoMoPa erpresst worden sind.
Siehe: http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:8jmni-h2e_4J:www.maurischatinhaft.wordpress.com/+verhaftung+klaus+maurischat&cd=2&hl=de&ct=clnk&gl=de&source=www.google.de
Klaus-Dieter Maurischat hat nach Angaben von Meridian Capital bereits 23 Gerichtsurteile wegen einschlägiger Vergehen und ist im Gegensatz zu seinen Cyber-Opfern tatsächlich vorbestraft (zum Beispiel: Krefeld vom 24. April 2006; AZ: 28 Ls 85/05) siehe http://sjb-fonds-opfer.com/?page_id=11764.
(Investment Magazin, Investment, Das Investment) DAS ORIGINAL – Der mehrfach vorbestrafte Serienbetrüger Klaus Maurischat („GoMoPa“) hat ein eigenes Portal nur für Kinder und deren „Sexualerziehung“. Dies haben der Informationsdienst Tip-Talk und die Anleger-Opfer von http://www.sjb-fonds-opfer.com enthüllt: http://www.gomopa4kids.net.
Hier werden User von dem mehrfach vorbestraften Betrüger (AZ: 28 Ls 85/05) darüber aufgeklärt, was es mit der „Selbstbefriedigung“ und anderen Sexualpraktiken angeblich auf sich hat: „Wahr oder falsch: Gerüchte über Selbstbefriedigung! „
TipTalk kommentiert: „Wenn Sie Ihre Kinder nicht selbst aufklären können oder wollen, sollten Sie das getrost Gomopa überlassen.
Über Selbstbefriedigung erzählt man sich immer noch verrückte Geschichten. Wir sagen dir was stimmt und was voll
gelogen ist!
http://www.gomopa4kids.net kümmert sich gern um Ihren Nachwuchs.
http://www.gomopa4kids.net/Forum/liebe-sex-und-beziehungen/wahr-oder-falsch-geruechte-ueber-selbstbefriedigung-
p232.html#post232.“
Unsere Presseanfrage zu dem heiklen Thema beantworte der vorbestrafte Betrüger erst gar nicht, sondern schickte einen Herren „Siegfried Siewert“ vor, der versuchte mit Droh-Telefonaten
und Droh-E-Mails das Erscheinen der brisanten Informationen zu verhindern.
Siehe auch
http://sjb-fonds-opfer.com/?p=11490
Pikant dabei: „Siegfied Siewert“ ist wie viele „GoMoPa“-Kenner wissen, ein selbstgewähltes Pseudonym für Klaus Maurischat.
Und: Die „GoMoPa“-Kinder-Webseite wird genau da gehostet, wo auch Maurischats GoMoPa-Webpage sowie zahlreiche ihm zugerechnete Cyberstalking-Erpresserseiten gehostet werden (siehe die Verbindungsdaten im nachfolgenden Text).
Erstaunlich ist auch, das Maurischat seinen zahlreichen Cyberstalking-Opfern immer wieder Sexualdelikte mit Kindern vorgeworfen hat – an diesen anoynmen Vorwürfen war natürlich in keinem Fall irgendetwas wahr.
(Investment Magazin, Investment, Das Investment) DAS ORIGINAL – „Die Festnahme des Herrn Klaus Maurischat ist ein ausschlaggebender Moment, anders gesagt eine „Wende um 180 Grad” für ihn persönlich. Es bedeutet aber auch den „Anfang vom Ende“ für seine Mitarbeiter, für die Internetservices, Bloggers, die mit GOMOPA so gerne und ohne Widerspruch zusammengearbeitet hatten. Es unterliegt keinem Zweifel, dass die Festnahme von Herrn Klaus Maurischat nur die Spitze des „Eisbergs” ist“, so Meridian Capital, die von Maurischat und GoMoPa erpresst worden sind.
Siehe: http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:8jmni-h2e_4J:www.maurischatinhaft.wordpress.com/+verhaftung+klaus+maurischat&cd=2&hl=de&ct=clnk&gl=de&source=www.google.de
Klaus-Dieter Maurischat hat nach Angaben von Meridian Capital bereits 23 Gerichtsurteile wegen einschlägiger Vergehen und ist im Gegensatz zu seinen Cyber-Opfern tatsächlich vorbestraft (zum Beispiel: Krefeld vom 24. April 2006; AZ: 28 Ls 85/05) siehe http://sjb-fonds-opfer.com/?page_id=11764.
„Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. London, seit Jahren im Kampf gegen den Cyber-Terrorismus aktiv, enthüllt neue kriminelle Erscheinungen im Netz
(Investment Magazin, Investment, Das Investment) DAS ORIGINAL – Über eine selbstgebaute Blogseite verbreiten die GoMoPa-Gangster eine gefälschte Stellung von Meridian Capital, um Verwirrung zu stiften.
Diese Blogseite existiert erst seit Dezember 2010.
Beweis:
http://www.hypestat.com/pressreleaser.org
Die Meridian Capital-Seite, das Original,
http://othergomopa.blogspot.com/
ist dagegen bereits seit2009 online
Beweis: Aussage Meridian Capital – das Unternehmen können Sie auch gerne direkt kontaktieren.
und
KLAUS DIETER MAURISCHAT IN DETENTION
Source: http://klaus-dieter-maurischat.blogspot.com/2009/01/klaus-dieter-maurischat-in-haft.html
Hintergrund:
Klaus Maurischat und Mark Vornkahl, Betreiber vonwww.gomopa.net: Am 24. April 2006 war die Verhandlung am Amtsgericht Krefeld in der Betrugssache: Mark Vornkahl / Klaus Maurischat ./. Dehnfeld. Aktenzeichen: 28 Ls 85/05 Klaus MaurischatLange Straße 3827313 Dörverden.Das in diesem Verfahren ausschließlich diese Betrugsache verhandelt wurde, ist das Urteil gegen Klaus Maurischat recht mäßig ausgefallen.Zusammenfassung der Verhandlung vom 24.04.2006 vor dem Schöffengericht des AG Krefeld in der Sache gegen Klaus Maurischat und Mark Vornkahl.Zur Hauptverhandlung erschienen:Richter Dr. Meister, 2 Schöffen,Staatsanwalt, Angeklagter Klaus Maurischat, vertr. durch RA Meier, Berlin; aus der U-Haft zur Verhandlung überführt.1. Eine Gerichtsvollzieherin stellt unter Ausschuss der Öffentlichkeit eine Urkunde an den Angeklagten Maurischat zu.2. Bei Mark Vornkahl wurde im Gerichtssaal eineTaschenpfändung vorgenommen.Beginn der HauptverhandlungDie Beklagten verzichten auf eine Einlassung zu Beginn.Nach Befragung des Zeugen Denfeld zum Sachverhalt wurde dieVerhandlung auf Wunsch der Staatsanwaltschaft und den Verteidigern unterbrochen.Der Angeklagte Maurischat gab nach Fortsetzung derHauptverhandlung Folgendes zu Protokoll:Er sähe ein, dass das Geld auf das falsche Konto gegangen sei und nicht dem eigentlichen Verwendungszweck zugeführt wurde. Das Geld sei aber zurückgezahlt worden und er distanziere sich ausdrücklich von einem Betrug.Schließung der BeweisaufnahmeDer Staatsanwalt verließt sein PlädoyerEr halte am Vorwurf des Betruges fest. Mit Hinweis auf die einschlägigen Vorstrafen des Angekl. Maurischatund auf laufende Ermittlungsverfahren, beantrage er ein Strafmaß von 1 Jahr und 6 Monaten.Er halte dem Angeklagten zu Gute, dass dieserWiedergutmachung geleistet habe, und dass dieser geständig war. Zudem läge die letzte Verurteilung wegen Betruges 11 Jahre zurück. Auch sei der Geschädigte nicht in existentielle Not geraten, wobei der Staatsanwalt nicht über noch laufende Verfahren hinweg sehen könne. Er läge aber dem Angeklagten Maurischat nahe, keine weiteren Aktivitäten im Bezirk der Staatsanwaltschaft Krefeld auszuüben, insbesondere möchte er, dass keine weiteren Anleger im Bezirk der Staatsanwaltschaft Krefeld durch GoMoPa akquiriert werden.Die Freiheitsstrafe soll zur Bewährung ausgesetzt werden.Plädoyer des Verteidigers des Angekl. Maurischat, Herrn RA MeierEr schließe sich, wie (in der Unterbrechung) vereinbart, dem Staatsanwalt an.Es stimme, dass sein Mandant Fehler in seiner Vergangenheit gemacht habe, und dass er auch diesmal einen Fehler begangen haben könnte, jedoch sei der Hinweis wichtig, dass sein Mandant aus diesen Fehlern gelernt habe.Der Angeklagte haben das letzte Wort.Maurischat sagt, es sei bereits alles gesagt worden.Unterbrechung zu Hauptverhandlung. Der Richter zieht sich mit den Schöffen zur Beratung zurück.Urteilsverkündung:Der Angeklagte wird des gemeinschaftlichen Betrugs für schuldig befunden.Der Angeklagte Klaus Maurischat wird zu einerFreiheitsstrafe von 1 Jahr und 6 Monaten verurteilt. Diese wird zur Bewährung ausgesetzt.Die Bewährungszeit wird auf 3 Jahre festgesetzt.Der Haftbefehl gegen Klaus Maurischat wird aufgehoben.Der Angeklagte trage die Kosten des Verfahrens.UrteilsbegründungDer Richter erklärt, dass eine Täuschung des Geschädigtenvorliegt und somit keine Untreue in Betracht kommen kann.Die Fragen, ob es sich um einen Anlagebetrug handele sei irrelevant. Er hält den Angeklagten die geleistete Wiedergutmachung zu Gute.Ebenso ist das Geständnis für die Angeklagten zu werten. Zudem liegt die letzte Verurteilung des Angeklagten Maurischat 11 Jahre zurück.Die Parteien verzichten auf Rechtsmittel. Das Urteil ist somit rechtskräftig.Mit dem heutigen Urteil endet ein Kapitel in derBetrugssache Goldman Morgenstern & Partners, Klaus Maurischat und Mark Vornkahl.Alle GoMoPa.net Verantwortlichen, Maurischat, Vornkahl und Henneberg sind nun vorbestrafte Abzocker und Betrüger und die Zukunft der Pseudoklitsche GoMoPa.net sieht duster aus.Mir dem Geständnis der beiden ABZOCKER MAURISCHAT UND VORNKAHL vor Gericht bricht ein jahrelangaufrechterhaltenes Lügengeflecht von einigen primitiven Betrügern zusammen. Gewohnheitsverbrecher und Denunzianten,die rechtschaffene Personen und Firmen in ihren Verbrecherforen kriminalisierten.
|
||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Wir haben ihn wegen Verleumdung und anderer schwerwiegender Delikte angezeigt.
Das Handelsblatt schreibt über Maurischat undGoMopa: „Die Bundesanstalt für
Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht BaFin hat aufgrund der merkwürdigen
Kursturbulenzen der Wirecard -Aktie eine förmliche Untersuchung des Falles
eingeleitet. BaFin prüft mögliche Marktmanipulationen nach Falschbericht des
Internetdienstes Gomopa. Zwei der Gomopa-Gründer wurden schon 2006 wegen Betrugs
verurteilt…
Mark Vornkahl, einer der Gründer von Gomopa wies den Vorwurf der
Kursmanipulation gestern zurück. Man wolle nur die Wahrheit aufdecken. Es ist
allerdings nicht das erste Mal, dass Gomopa-Vertreter ins Zwielicht geraten.
2006 wurden Vornkahl und Mitgründer Klaus Maurischat wegen Betrugs an einem
Anleger verurteilt. Maurischat gab gestern gegenüber dem Handelsblatt weitere
Verurteilungen zu. Es habe sich dabei jedoch nicht um Anlagebetrug gehandelt.
;siehe Beweis:
und die Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung (FAZ) schreibt über Maurischat und
GoMoPa.
“Nach Informationen der F.A.Z. sollen unter anderem gezielt über den
Finanznachrichtendienst Gomopa im Internet Gerüchte über Pennystocks gestreut
worden sein. Gomopa steht für Goldman Morgenstern & Partners Consulting LLC. Auf
ihrer Internetseite hat Gomopa „Transparenz in Sachen Finanzen, Vorsorge und
Geldanlage“ versprochen, doch ihr Chef Klaus Maurischat saß als mutmaßlicher
Betrüger schon in Untersuchungshaft.
Seit einigen Tagen ist die Internetseite www.gomopa.net offline, und es
kursieren Gerüchte über finanzielle Unregelmäßigkeiten. Immer wieder ist Gomopa
in juristische Streitigkeiten verwickelt. In einer einstweiligen Verfügung des
Landgerichts Berlin vom 31. August (Az.: 27 O 658/10) ist das Unternehmen
aufgefordert worden, nicht länger Falschinformationen über den Kasseler
Immobilienhändler Immovation AG und seinen Finanzvorstand Lars Bergmann zu
verbreiten. „Gomopa hat seinen Firmensitz bewusst in New York, weil die Firma
dort presserechtlich nicht belangt werden kann“, sagte ein Kenner des
Unternehmens der F.A.Z.”
siehe Beweis:
Klaus Maurischt wurde wegen dem Kapitalanlagebetrug an seinem eigenen
"GoMoPa"-Anleger rechtskräftig als Betrüger verurteilt:
siehe Beweis:
http://gomopa2009.wordpress.com/2009/04/18/das-urteil-gegen-den-gomopa-kriminellen-inhaber-klaus-maurischat/
weitere Informationen zu Maurischat und seinen mutmasslichen Komplizen
Gerd-Wilhelm Bennewirtz, Peter Ehlers, Volker Schmidt-Jennrich etc.. finden Sie
in der Presselounge der SJB-Opfer.
siehe Beweise:
http://sjb-fonds-opfer.com/?page_id=11764
Der mehrfach vorbestrafte Serienbetrüger Klaus Maurischat („GoMoPa“) hat ein
eigenes Portal nur für Kinder und deren „Sexualerziehung“. Dies haben der
Informationsdienst Tip-Talk und die Anleger-Opfer von http://www.sjb-fonds-opfer.com
enthüllt: http://www.gomopa4kids.net.
Hier werden User von dem mehrfach vorbestraften Betrüger (AZ: 28 Ls 85/05)
darüber aufgeklärt, was es mit der „Selbstbefriedigung“ und anderen
Sexualpraktiken angeblich auf sich hat: „Wahr oder falsch: Gerüchte über
Selbstbefriedigung! „
TipTalk kommentiert: „Wenn Sie Ihre Kinder nicht selbst aufklären können oder
wollen, sollten Sie das getrost Gomopa überlassen.
Über Selbstbefriedigung erzählt man sich immer noch verrückte Geschichten. Wir
sagen dir was stimmt und was voll
gelogen ist!
http://www.gomopa4kids.net kümmert sich gern um Ihren Nachwuchs.
http://www.gomopa4kids.net/Forum/liebe-sex-und-beziehungen/wahr-oder-falsch-geruechte-ueber-selbstbefriedigung-
p232.html#post232.“ (Inzwischen gelöscht)
siehe Beweis unter
http://sjb-fonds-opfer.com/?p=11490
Unsere Presseanfrage zu dem heiklen Thema beantworte der vorbestrafte Betrüger
erst gar nicht, sondern schickte einen Herren „Siegfried Siewert“ vor, der
versuchte mit Droh-Telefonaten und Droh-E-Mails bei uns und unseren Informanten
das Erscheinen der brisanten Informationen zu verhindern.
Siehe Beweise unter
http://sjb-fonds-opfer.com/?p=11616
und
http://sjb-fonds-opfer.com/?p=11490
Pikant dabei: „Siegfied Siewert“ ist wie viele „GoMoPa“-Kenner wissen, ein
selbstgewähltes Pseudonym für Klaus Maurischat.
Und: Die „GoMoPa“-Kinder-Webseite wird genau da gehostet, wo auch Maurischats
GoMoPa-Webpage sowie zahlreiche ihm zugerechnete Cyberstalking-Erpresserseiten
gehostet werden (siehe die Verbindungsdaten im nachfolgenden Text).
Erstaunlich ist auch, das Maurischat seinen zahlreichen Cyberstalking-Opfern
immer wieder Sexualdelikte mit Kindern vorgeworfen hat – an diesen anoynmen
Vorwürfen war natürlich in keinem Fall irgendetwas wahr.
Unser Bildtext: Klaus Maurischat: There is no Place like home
So wollte der Serienbetrüger Klaus Maurischat uns zwingen die Berichterstattung über den “NACHRICHTENDIENST” “GoMoPa” einzustellen
Meine Anmerkung: Sie lesen
den Original-Text mit den Original-Rechtschreibfehlern von Maurischat in chronologischer Reihenfolge von unten nach oben. “Unter den Linden” ist die Regus-Tarnadresse für den untergetauchten Serienbetrüger und Stasi-Ganoven. “SUMA” steht im Sprach-Jargon des “GoMoPa”-“NACHRICHTENDIENSTLERS” für Suchmaschine.
Zitat:
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA (MEINE ANTWORT)
> Was anderes fällt einem Hilfsschüler auch nicht ein! Wenn ich dich
> schnappe, dann haue ich dir die Fresse ein – mein Lieber! Merk dir
> das gut, du Kinderficker!
>
> Was sagt denn dein Freund Dr. XXX zu deinem handeln, Schwuchtel?
>
> > HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA (MEINE ANTWORT)
> >
> > > Geiles Google Suchergebniss hast du mittlerweile. Das ist sowas von
> > > geil. Am besten ist dieser Beitrag zu Deiner Magisterarbeit, du
> > > Spinner:
> > >
> > > http://scheisshausfliege.wordpress.com/2011/01/29/die-diplomarbeit-des-magisters-bernd-pulch-ein-haufen-scheisse/
> > >
> > > Wenn du nicht aufhörst, wird niemand mehr ein Stück Brot von dir
> > > nehmen. Dein Name ist dan absolut durch. Glaub mir, wir verstehen da
> > > mehr von als du Schwachkopf!
> > >
> > > Im Übrigen kannst du mich stets gern persönlich treffen. Unter den
> > > Linden 21, Berlin – habe immer für dich Feigling Zeit! (TARN-ADRESSE)
> > >
> > > So – und nun überle wann du die Artikel über uns löschen willst,
> > > sonst mache ich die erste Seite der SUMA Ergebnisse mit deinen
> > > Einträgen voll.
Die Cybermord-Opfer Lothar Berresheim, Dipl.-Ing. Paul Bösel, Andreas Decker, Herbert Ernst Meridian Capital, Bernd Pulch und Martin Sachs, klären über den kriminellen und serienmässig vorbestraften Ex-Gefängnissinsassen Klaus-Dieter Maurischat und seine GoMoPa-Erepresserbande auf:
Nachfolgend publizieren wir eine der besten Darstellungen zum Thema Cyber-Terrorismus. Besonders pikant dabei der Bericht über die Maurischat-Festname durch das BKA.
Klaus-Dieter Maurischat hat nach Angaben von Meridian Capital bereits 23 Gerichtsurteile wegen einschlägiger Vergehen und ist im Gegensatz zu seinen Cyber-Opfern tatsächlich vorbestraft (zum Beispiel: Krefeld vom 24. April 2006; AZ: 28 Ls 85/05)
Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. London, seit Jahren im Kampf gegen den Cyber-Terrorismus aktiv, enthüllt neue kriminelle Erscheinungen im Netz
I. Sachverhalt
In der letzten Zeit taucht im Netz immer häufiger eine neue zugleich eine sehr beunruhigende Erscheinung krimineller Art auf. Professionelle Verbrechergruppen im Netz nehmen daran teil, die zu Erpressungen, Betrügereien, Erschwindeln in Bezug auf bestimmte gezielt ausgesuchte Firmen und Unternehmen fähig sind. Diese Kriminellen entwickelten neue Methoden und Mittel, sich einfach und in kurzer Zeit zu bereichern.
Strategien und Erscheinungsformen, welche diesem Prozedere zugrunde liegen, sind recht einfach.
Ein Krimineller sucht sich „sorgfältig“ im Internet spezielle Firmen und Korporationen (Opfer des Verbrechens) aus und informiert diese im nächsten Schritt darüber, dass über die Geschäftstätigkeit solcher Firmen und Korporationen in der nächsten Zeit – zuerst im Internet dann in weiteren zugänglichen Massenmedien – zahlreiche und äußerst ungünstige Informationen erscheinen.
Gleichzeitig schlagen die Kriminellen ihren künftigen Opfern – wie Magister Bernd Pulch – eine wirksame Hilfe, unnötigen Schwierigkeiten und Problemen zu entkommen, welche auf Verlust des guten Namens und Images der betroffenen Firma und Korporation abzielen. Diese Straftäter sind sich dessen bewusst, dass guter Ruf, Name und Aussehen jedes Unternehmens ein Wert in sich selbst sei. Es sei also ein Wert, wofür jedes Unternehmen bereit ist, jeglichen Preis zu zahlen. Bloß aus dem Grunde, um Schwierigkeiten und Probleme zu vermeiden, welche aus dem Verlust des guten Namens und Rufes resultieren.
Die Straftäter und ihre Opfer sind sich dessen im Klaren, dass dieser Verlust verheerende Konsequenzen zur Folge haben mag, die das Stilllegen einer bestimmten Geschäftstätigkeit erzwingen können. Dies nimmt sowohl auf Kein- als auch auf Großunternehmen Bezug. Die betrifft Firmen, die praktisch in jeder Branche und in jedem Land grenzüberschreitend tätig sind.
Das kriminelle Prozedere in Form einer Erpressung aufs Geld, eines Betrugs entwickelt sich heutzutage rasant und wird global, d.h. grenzüberschreitend und international geführt. Zu Opfer der Erpressung, des Betrugs fallen heutzutage sowohl heimisch wirkende (inländische) als auch internationale Korporationen, die großen Wert auf Erhaltung, Behalten und Pflege ihres guten Rufes dem entsprechend ihrer geschäftlichen Glaubwürdigkeit legen.
Die Kriminellen im Netz haben begriffen, dass die Pflege eines unantastbaren Rufes und Namens eines Unternehmens die einzigartige Möglichkeit auf schnelle und einfache Bereicherung bildet.
Das oben erwähnte kriminelle Vorgehen ist schwer zu verfolgen, weil es internationaler Natur ist und durch verschobene oder gar nicht existierende (fiktive) Berufs- und Justizpersonen in verschiedenen Ländern firmiert und betrieben wird.
Diese Straftäter im Netz veröffentlichen, unterbringen und verbreiten wahrheitswidrige Informationen über Ihre Opfer auf weit entlegenen Servern, welche sich nicht selten oft in exotischen Ländern befinden. Es sind diejenigen Staaten, in denen gravierende Lücken im Rechtssystem, Ermittlungs- und Verfolgungsverfahren sichtbar sind. Als Beispiel kann an dieser Stelle Indien erwähnt werden.
Mit den Verbrechern im Netz arbeiten Netzportale Führer von bekannten Blogs mit Ihrem Sitz -bewusst oder unbewusst- auch in den hoch entwickelnden Ländern zusammen. Beispielsweise können an dieser Stelle Länder wie Deutschland, Österreich, die Schweiz, die USA, Großbritannien, Spanien oder Portugal erwähnt werden.
Die unten aufgelisteten Kriminellen konnten bis heute weitgehend unbestraft handeln. Als Symptom derartigen Handelns taucht hier die Tätigkeit und „Wirksamkeit“ der Firma GOMOPAauf, welche sich über Länder wie die Bundesrepublik Deutschland, die Schweiz, Österreich, die USA, Großbritannien, Spanien und Indien erstreckt. Ein gutes Beispiel eines derartigen Handelns ist Herr Klaus Maurischat – der Anführer und „Gehirn” der Firma GOMOPA mit vielen bereits in Kraft getretenen Straftaten und Urteilen „auf seinem Konto”, der auf diese Art und Weise jahrelang seinen Unterhalt finanzierte und in der Branche nahezu unbegrenzt aktiv war (erst jüngst mutmasslich im Auftrag der SJB, Korschenbroich/Neuss).
Dieser Stand ändert sich jedoch drastisch, u.a. dank weit und breit geführten Maßnahmen der Firma Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd., welche sich gegen solche Strafdelikte im Netz richten. Auch andere Firmen und Korporationen, welche dem Verbrechen im Netz und außerhalb dieses Mediums zu Opfer gefallen sind, tragen zur Bekämpfung solcher Delikte bei.
Die Lage ändert sich auch dank wirksamen Schritten und der erfolgreichen Zusammenarbeit der Firma Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. mit der internationalen Polizei Interpol, mit der Bundesagentur (FBI) in den USA, mit der BUNDESKRIMINALPOLIZEI in Deutschland, mit SCOTLAND YARD in Großbritannien, sowie mit dem Russischen Geheimdienst FSB.
Die Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. – gemeinsam mit weiteren Firmen und Kooperationen, die zu Opfer krimineller Aktivitäten des Netzverbrechens gefallen sind – hat unbestreitbar schon erste Erfolge zu verzeichnen.
Dass im November 2008 auf dem Territorium der Bundesrepublik Deutschland der oben erwähnte Anführer und „Gehirn“ der Firma GOMOPA, Herr Klaus Maurishat festgenommen wurde, darf nicht außer Acht gelassen werden. Aus den derMeridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. zur Verfügung stehenden Informationen resultiert eindeutig, dass die nächsten Verhaftungen der an diesem Prozedere teilnehmenden Personen in solchen Ländern wie: Österreich, die Schweiz, Russland, die Ukraine, Polen, Spanien, Mexiko, Portugal, Brasilien, die USA, Kanada, Großbritannien, Irland, Australien, New Seeland und in a. erfolgen.
Das oberste Ziel der Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. sowie der weiteren Opfer des Verbrechens im Netz ist es, alle Teilnehmer dieses kriminellen Prozedere vor das zuständige Gericht zu führen.
Alle Berufs- und Justizpersonen, unabhängig vom Sitz und der ausgeübten Geschäftstätigkeit, welche dem oben beschriebenen kriminellen Vorgehen (Betrug, Erpressung) zu Opfer gefallen sind, können der von der Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. geführten Kompanie beitreten, die sich zum Ziel setzt, alle an dem an dieser Stelle dargestellten Prozedere Mitbeteiligten aus dem öffentlichen sowie dem wirtschaftlichen Leben auszuschließen.
II. Schwarze Liste mit internationalen Erpressern und Betrügern sowie Ihre Methoden (opus operandi) in den folgenden Ländern:
1. Die Bundesrepublik Deutschland
2. Dubai
3. Russland
1. Die Bundesrepublik Deutschland
GOMOPA GmbH, Goldman Morgenstern & Partners LLC., Goldman Morgenstern & Partners Consulting LLC, Wottle Inkasso Büro. In diesen Firmen sind folgende Personen recht aktiv:
– Klaus Maurischat („Vater” und „Gehirn” der kriminellen Organisation, der für den unzählige rechtskräftige Urteile zu verzeichnen sind (festgenommen in Deutschland im November 2008);
– Rudolf Josef Heckel („rechte Hand” bei Herrn Klaus Maurischat, ehemaliger denunzierter Banker, der an vielen maßlosen Bankschmuggeleien mitbeteiligt war. (Heutzutage persona non grata im deutschen Bankwesen);
– Peter Reski (zuständig für das Finanzwesen, bekannt für Betrug, Fälschungen und Steuerunterschlagungen, hinter denen bereits rechtkräftige Urteile stehen);
– Mark Vornkahl (zuständig für organisatorisch-administrative Aufgaben beiGOMOPA, ehemaliger Polizeibeamter, entlassen wegen zahlreichem Verstießen im Dienst, hat bereits ein paar rechtskräftige Urteile „auf seinem Konto“);
– Claus i Ulrike Wottle (Ehepaar, für das sogenannte „unkonventionelle” Vollstrecken der Schulden vor allem zugunsten GOMOPA. Dieser Vollstreckung lagen Erzwingung, Erpressung mit Gewalt zugrunde, die auf sowohl tatsachliche als auch fiktive Schulden Bezug nahmen?
Wie funktioniert das System von GOMOPA
Die oben in Kurze erwähnten Personen, sowie die mit dem Service GOMOPAKooperierenden, so genannte „GOMOPA-Experten“, Bloggers und alle weiteren Berufs-und Justizpersonen suchen sich aus allen möglichen Quellen Informationen über große, reichen Firmen und Korporationen aus, welche in verschiedenen heimischen und internationalen Wirtschaftszweigen tätig sind. Dem Service GOMOPA liegt besonders daran, dass man diejenigen aussucht, die „in Sich selbst ins Auge fallen”. Diejenigen Firmen und Korporationen also, gegen die relativ einfach und ohne großen Aufwand sich Vorwürfe, Unstimmigkeiten u. s. w. sich machen lassen, in bezug auf die sogar Straftaten wie Erschwindeln und Betrügen u. a. sich leicht vorführen lassen. Es ist allgemein bekannt, dass jeder Firma besonders an ihrer guten Präsenz und an ihrem unantastbaren Namen liegt. Jedes Unternehmen wird dem entsprechend alles tun, um ihre gute Präsenz also auch ihre Glaubwürdigkeit beibehalten zu können. Wenn aber zum Opfer des GOMOPA und seiner „Partner” ein großes und reiches Unternehmen fällt, so kann man sich an solchen Unternehmen schnell, einfach und sogar beachtlich bereichern.
Es taucht an dieser Stelle die Frage auf:
Welcher schlaue Straftäter, der im Netz und außerhalb des Netzes mir Erfolg wirkt, möchte daraus kein Nutzen ziehen?
Die Kriminellen im Netz wissen genau, dass ohne geschäftliche Glaubwürdigkeit kein Vertrauen vorhanden sei, welches jeder Geschäftstätigkeit unentbehrlich ist. GOMOPAsowie alle mit dem Kooperierenden haben mit Sicherheit alle möglichen Methoden und Maßnahmen beherrscht, wie man Glaubwürdigkeit und Vertrauen einer Firma, eines Unternehmens, einer Korporation (Verbrechensopfer) in Frage stellt.
Dies zieht eben die Aufmerksamkeit der User an, so dass die Homepage des GOMOPAwww.gomopa.net in den Suchmaschinen wie Google, Yahoo leicht auffindbar ist. Dies wiederum bedeutet nichts anderes als Zusatzprofite für das Service GOMOPA , weil um seine Tätigkeit herum ein mediales Diskurs geschaffen wird.
Ein auf den ersten Blick banales und einfaches Opfer der Erpressung kann beispielsweise eine öffentliche, staatliche Instanz, welche auf Basis der öffentlichen Glaubwürdigkeit funktioniert, werden, wie eine Bank oder ein bankfremdes Finanzinstitut. So war es eben mit dem bankfremden, internationalen FinanzinstitutMeridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. der Fall.
Ein einfaches und leichtes Opfer de illegalen und materiellen Gewinns können auch die Versicherungsgesellschaften werden, bei denen – wie es aus unseren Recherchen resultiert-, vieles auf die kriminelle Tätigkeit des GOMOPA vor allem auf dem Gebiet der Bundesrepublik Deutschland, der Schweiz und Österreich zurückzuführen sei. Unter den bekannten und erkennbaren Opfern sind mit Sicherheit deutsche, österreichische und schweizerische Banken, Versicherungsgesellschaften wie z.B. Allianz aus Deutschland, deutsche und österreichische Firmen wie HDI und DKV sichtbar.
Dies, wozu sich das Service GOMOPA traut und was die mit dem kooperierenden Services, Blogs heutzutage praktizieren, ist das so genannte Cyber-Stalking, welches sich rasant im Netz verbreitet. Die kriminelle Methode besteht an dieser Stelle u. a. im Bedrohen, dass über die Geschäftstätigkeit eines Unternehmens (Ofer der Erpressung, Erzwingung und Bedrohung) fiktive, gar nicht existierende Informationen (Lügen, Gerüchte, Geschichtchen, Nachrede, Beleidigungen) zuerst im Netz dann in anderen Massenmedien veröffentlicht werden. Dies dient lediglich dazu, um ein potenzielles Opfer dazu zu bewegen, eine beachtliche Geldsumme für die so genannte „Ruhe“ dem Erpresser bereitzustellen. Die „Ruhe” bedeutet hier das Versprechen einer Zugangssperre in Bezug auf die Veröffentlichung jeglicher fiktiven Information im Netz und in allen weiteren Massenmedien, die die Opfer der Erpressung im äußerst negativen Licht darstellen kann.
Derartige Bedrohungen setzen sich, wie bereits oben erwähnt zum Ziel, Firmen – potenzielle Opfer des Cyber-Stalking dazu zu veranlassen, dass sie sich selbst „aufkaufen“. Kurz gesagt, GOMOPA und seinesgleichen, sowie die mit denen kooperierenden Services und Blogs, kreieren eine „virtuelle Wirklichkeit”, oder anders gesagt, publizieren fiktive Informationen über potenzielle Opfer eines Verbrechens. Firmen und Korporationen, welche gegen Bedrohung und Erpressung seitens GOMOPAnicht fällig sind, diejenigen also, welche für so genannte „Ruhe“ nicht zahlen wollen, werden zum Opfern schwerwiegender Lügen, Beleidigungen, Insinuationen und anderer krimineller Unterschlagungen, die Aussehen und Präsenz einer Firma mit Sicherheit beeinträchtigen.
Eines gilt als Ziel des GOMOPA, nämlich so schnell und so einfach, wie es geht, das Geld abzukassieren, und wenn sich eine Firma weigert und sich die „Ruhe“ nicht kaufen möchte, wird sie unerwartet und blitzschnell zum Objekt der Erpressung und Beleidigung im Netz.
An dieser Stelle taucht folgende Frage auf: Wie ist es möglich, dass der Anführer der Firma GOMOPA, Herr Klaus Maurischat, der nur in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland auf seinem „Konto” 23 Gerichtsurteile hat, sich jahrelang als einen ehrlichen Bürger kreieren, zugleich anderen Personen, Firmen, Korporationen verbrecherische Taten, Delikte einprägen, dazu noch daran beachtliche Geldsummen verdienen konnte? Dieses komplexe Prozedere kann nur folgendermaßen erklärt werden:
GOMOPA kreiert sein Aussehen, seine Präsenz in den Augen der öffentlichen Meinung als ein ehrliches Subjekt, welches gegen pathologische Erscheinungen des öffentlichen und wirtschaftlichen Alltags einschreitet. GOMOPA und seine Partner (Services, Blogs) stellen sich als Verfolger jeglicher Verbrechensart dar, versprechen also den Kampf gegen jeden virtuellen Verbrecher im Netz (insbesondere gegen jeden Betrüger, Erpresser). GOMOPA verwendet in dieser Hinsicht eine Art „Merketingsvorhang” als Methode der Verführung, infolge dessen es sein wahres „Antlitz“ und seine wahren Intentionen als die eines Betrügers und Erpressers aufs Geld verbergen kann. Die wahren Absichten des GOMOPA, der mit GOMOPA zusammen arbeitenden Services und Blogs konnten bis heute zweifelsohne mit Erfolg vor der öffentlichen Meinung versteckt bleiben, vor allem dank des so genannten „Rauchvorhangs“, welcher sich darin widerspiegelt, dass man sich selbst als „Sieger“ jeglichen Missbrauchs und jeder pathologischen Erscheinung des öffentlichen und wirtschaftlichen Lebens in Deutschaland, Österreich, der Schweiz, den USA, Großbritannien, Russland, Spanien kreiert.
Als nächstes taucht die von dem GOMOPA vorgeschobene Person auf, welche Firmen und Korporationen – die künftigen Opfer des Verbrechens also – vor der Möglichkeit der Veröffentlichung von äußerst ungünstigen und das betroffene Unternehmen in einem negativen Licht darstellenden Informationen im Internet und in weiteren Massenmedien warnt. Die Person, von der hier die Rede ist, informiert zugleich, dass sie sich mit Erfolg gegen so ein Prozedere für ein entsprechendes „Honorar“ einsetzen kann. Der GOMOPA geht es an dieser Stelle um die Erpressung aufs Geld für so genannte „Ruhe” um die Firma und Korporation (Opfer eines Verbrechens) herum. Meistens wird seitens der betroffenen Firmen auf solche Bedrohungen überhaupt nicht reagiert, weil sie zu ihrem Alltag und ihrer Tagesordnung gehören. Es fehlt schließlich kaum an Erpressern im Netz und außerhalb des Mediums. Normalerweise kommt es also selten zu so genannter „Verständigung”, wobei auf der einen Seite die Verbrechensopfer, auf der anderen Seite das GOMOPA auftritt. Es ist verständlich, dass der Preis für so eine „Verständigung” die Bereitstellung der von dem GOMOPA geforderten Gelder wäre. Die finanzielle Erpressung wird in dieser Etappe selten vollzogen. Die Lage ändert sich jedoch kaum, wenn die Firmen und Korporationen (Verbrechensopfer) erfahren, dass die Bedrohung erfüllt sei. In Kurze erscheinen auf der Homepage http://www.gomopa.netzahlreiche Presseartikel, Schein-berichte und Pseudomarktanalysen, die sowohl durchGOMOPA als auch durch so genannte „unabhängige Experten“ firmiert und vertreten werden, die mit GOMOPA formal oder fiktiv zusammenarbeiten. Informationen, hier publiziert, entsprechen den Inhalten aus einer Bedrohung und stellen die Geschäftstätigkeit der Personen, Firmen und Korporationen in einem äußerst negativen Licht dar.
Es unterliegt keinem Zweifel, dass derartige Maßnahmen und Methoden bloß auf Beeinträchtigung des guten Namens und der guten Präsenz dieser Firmen und Korporationen abzielen.
Die Tätigkeit von GOMOPA ist damit mit Sicherheit nicht ausgeschöpft. GOMOPAverbreitet (publiziert, unterbringt) die oben dargestellten Informationen im Netz, indem es sich der glaubwürdigen, populären und meinungsbildenden Services bedient. Mehr noch, GOMOPA droht den Firmen und Korporationen (seinen Opfern), dass die „aus dem Finger gezogenen“ Informationen nicht nur im Netz, sondern auch im Fernsehen und im Radio und in der Presselandschaft erscheinen.
Wie die Erfahrung und das bisherige Fachwissen der Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. zeigen, sind sich die Services meistens nicht dessen bewusst, dass sie zum Zwecke eines kriminellen Vorgehens durch das GOMOPA genutzt werden. Sie stimmen dem entsprechend mit den fiktiven Publikationen, Berichten und Analysen überein, welche speziell durch GOMOPA sowie durch „unabhängige“ Experten präpariert sind.
Es kommt auch vor, dass die Services und Blogs einer derartigen Zusammenarbeit mit dem GOMOPA Zustimmung erteilen, wobei sie genau wissen, dass die von GOMOPAübermittelten Informationen fiktiv sind und die Glaubwürdigkeit der Firmen und Korporationen beeinträchtigen. Sie nehmen also bewusst an dem kriminellen Prozedere teil. Die Erklärung dieser Lage ist recht einfach. GOMOPA zahlt nämlich den Services und Blogs entsprechende Vergütung, dass sie der Veröffentlichung von unwahren Informationen über die Firmen und Korporationen (Verbrechensopfer) zustimmen.
Einige Services und Blogs scheinen nichts davon gewusst zu haben, dass die auf ihren Seiten zur Verfügung gestellten Informationen „fiktiv“ und „aus dem Finger gezogen“ sind. Sie suchen auf diese Art und Weise ihre Verhaltensweise zu rechtfertigen, denn sie wollen den rechtlichen Konsequenzen wegen der Teilnahme am Missbrauch des guten Namens und Aussehens einer Firma oder Korporation entkommen.
Das Tätigkeitssystem von GOMOPA, von zusammenarbeitenden Services und Blogs wurde auch am Beispiel der Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. ausgetestet.
Anfang Oktober 2008 erhielt einer der Arbeiter der Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. eine Meldung von einem anonymen Sender, dass in naher Zukunft – zuerst im Internet, dann im Fernsehen, im Radio und in der deutschen Presse – Informationen erscheinen, die die Funktionsweise und Tätigkeiten der Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. in einem äußerst negativen Licht darstellen. Der Mitarbeiter derMeridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. wurde also informiert, dass diese Meldungen/Nachrichten zweifelsohne deutlich das Aussehen und den guten Ruf der Firma Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. beeinträchtigen.
Der an dieser Stelle erwähnte „Gesprächspartner” hat den Angestellten der Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. informiert, dass die Möglichkeit besteht die peinliche Situation zu vermeiden, indem die Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. auf das von der Person gezeigte Konto die Summe von 100.000,00 EUR überweist. Wie sich aber später zeigte, war der Herr Klaus Maurischat – dieser anonyme Gesprächspartner – „Gehirn“ und „Lider desGOMOPA“. Die Ermittlungen wurden angestellt durch die Bundeskriminalpolizei(Verfolgungs- und Ermittlungsorgan auf der Bundesebene) während des Ermittlungsverfahrens wegen einer finanziellen Erpressung, Betrügereien auch wegen der Bedrohungen, welche von Herrn Maurischat und seinen Mitarbeiter praktiziert wurden und werden sowie wegen Teilnahme anderer (Leiter der Internetservices und Moderatoren der Blogs) an diesem Prozedere. Diese Straftaten wurden begangen zu Schaden vieler Berufs- und Justizpersonen, darunter auch der Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. Die Opfer dieses Verbrechens sind in Deutschland, Österreich, der Schweiz, Spanien, Portugal, Großbritannien, den USA und Kanada sichtbar.
In diesem Moment taucht folgende Frage auf: Wie war die Reaktion der Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. auf die Forderungen seitens GOMOPA? Entsprach die Reaktion den Erwartungen von GOMOPA? Hat die Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. die geforderte Summe 100.000,00 EUR überwiesen?
Seites der Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. gab es überhaupt keine Reaktion auf den Erpressungsversuch von GOMOPA. Ende August 2008 auf dem Service http://www.gompa.net sind zahlreiche Artikel/Meldungen erscheinen, welche die Tätigkeit derMeridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. in einem sehr negativen Licht dargestellt haben. Nachdem die auf http://www.gomopa.net enthaltenen Informationen ausführlich und vollständig analysiert worden waren, ergab es sich, dass sie der Wahrheit nicht einmal in einem Punkt entsprechen und potenzielle und bereits bestehende Kunden derMeridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. in Bezug auf die von diesem Finanzinstitut geführten Geschäftstätigkeit irreführen. Infolge der kriminellen Handlugen von GOMOPA und der mit ihm kooperierenden Services und Blogs im Netz hat die Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. beachtliche und messbare geschäftliche Verluste erlitten. Die Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. hat nämlich in erster Linie eine wichtige Gruppe von potenziellen Kunden verloren. Was sich aber als wichtiger erwies, es haben sich die bisherigen Kunden von der Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. kaum abgewandt. Diejenigen Kunden haben unsere Dienstleitungen weiterhin genutzt und nutzen diese immer noch. In Hinblick auf die bisherige Zusammenarbeit mit der Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd., werden ihrerseits dem entsprechend keine Einwände erhoben .
GOMOPA hat so einen Verlauf der Ereignisse genau prognostiziert, dessen Ziel beachtliche und messbare geschäftliche durch die Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.erlittene Verluste waren. Der Verlauf der Ereignisse hat GOMOPA mit Sicherheit gefreut. GOMOPA hat nämlich darmit gerechnet, dass die Markt-Stellung derMeridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. nachlässt und das Finanzinstitut die geforderte Summe (100.000,00 EUR) bereitstellt. Im Laufe der Zeit, als das ganze Prozedere im Netz immer populärer war, versuchte GOMOPA noch vier mal zu der Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. Kontakte aufzunehmen, indem es jedes mal das Einstellen dieser kriminellen „Kampagne” versprochen hat, wobei es jedes mal seine finanziellen Forderungen heraufsetzte. Die letzte für das Einstellen der „Kampagne“ gegen dieMeridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. vorgesehene Quote betrug sogar 5.000.000,00 EUR (in Worten: fünf Milionen EURO). Die Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.konnte sich aber trotz der sich ständig steigenden Forderungen seitens GOMOPA im Markt behaupten.
Im Oktober 2008 traf die Leitung der Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.Entscheidung über die Benachrichtigung der Internationalen Polizei INTERPOL sowie entsprechender Strafverfolgungsorgane der BRD (die Polizei und die Staatsanwaltschaft) über den bestehenden Sachverhalt. In der Zwischenzeit meldeten sich bei der Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. zahlreiche Firmen und Korporationen, sogar Berufsperson wie Ärzte, Richter, Priester, Schauspieler und anderen Personen aus unterschiedlichen Ländern der Welt, die der Erpressung von GOMOPA nachgegeben und die geforderten Geldsummen überwiesen haben. Diese Personen gaben bereits Erklärungen ab, dass sie dies getan haben, damit man sie bloß endlich „in Ruhe lässt” und um unnötige Probleme, Schwierigkeiten und einen kaum begründbaren Ausklang vermeiden zu können. Die Opfer dieses kriminellen Vorgehens haben die Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. über unterschiedliche Geldsummen, welche verlangt wurden, informiert.
In einem Fall gab es verhältnismäßig kleine (um ein paar tausend EURO), in einem anderen Fall handelte es schon um beachtliche Summen (rund um paar Millionen EURO).
Zusätzlich wendeten sich an die Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. Firmen, welche der GOMOPA noch keine „Gebühr” überweisen haben und bereits überlegen, ob sie dies tun sollen, oder nicht. Diese Firmen erwarteten von der Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. eine klare Stellungnahme sowie eine professionelle praktische Beratung, wie man sich in solch einer Lage verhalten soll und wie man diese Geldforderungen umgehen kann. Die Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. hat ausnahmslos allen Verbrechensopfern, welche sich bei unserer Firma gemeldet haben, eine Zusammenarbeit vorgeschlagen. Als oberste Aufgabe stellt sich diese Kooperation, gemeinsam entschlossene und wirksame Maßnahmen gegen GOMOPA, gegen andere Services im Netz sowie gegen alle Bloggers zu treffen, die an dem hier beschriebenen internationalen kriminellen Vorgehen mit GOMOPA-Führung teilnehmen.
Alle diese Firmen traten einem so genannten von der Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. vorgeschlagenen „Kreuzzug” gegen GOMOPA, seine Partner bei. Auf unsere Bitte benachrichtigten alle mitbeteiligten Firmen die Internationale Polizei INTERPOL sowie ihre heimischen Verfolgungsorgane, u. a. die zuständige Staatsanwaltschaft und die Polizeibehörden über den bestehenden Sachverhalt.
In Hinblick auf die Tatsache, dass das verbrecherische Handeln von GOMOPA sich über viele Staaten erstreckte und dass die Anzahl der in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland erstatteten Anzeigen wegen der durch GOMOPA, Internetservices und Bloggers begangenen Straftaten, rasant wuchs – was zweifelsohne von einer weit gehenden kriminellen Wirkungskraft des GOMOPA zeugt – schlug die Internationale Wirtschaftspolizei INTERPOL der Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. vor, dass sich ihr Vertreter in Berlin mit dem Vertreter von GOMOPA trifft, um die „Zahlungsmodalitäten“ und Überweisung der Summe von 5.000.000,00 EUR zu besprechen. Dieser Schritt sollte, eine gut durchdachte und durch dieBundeskriminalpolizei organisierte Falle durchzuführen, deren Ziel die Festnahme der unter GOMOPA wirkenden internationalen Straftäter war.
Die koordinierten Schritte und Maßnahmen der Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.und anderer Beschädigter, geleitet von der Internationalen Wirtschaftspolizei INTERPOL, dem Bundeskriminalamt und der Staatsanwaltschaft der Bundesrepublik Deutschland haben zur Aus-, Einarbeitung und Durchführung der oben beschriebenen Falle beigetragen. Im November 2008 führte die in Berlin vorbereitete Falle zur Festnahme und Verhaftung des Vertreters des GOMOPA, der nach der Festnahme auf Herrn Klaus Maurichat – als den Hauptverantwortlichen und Anführer der internationalen kriminellen Gruppe GOMOPA verwies. Der Festgenommene benannte und zeigte der Bundeskriminalpolizei zugleich den aktuellen Aufenthaltsort des Herrn Klaus Maurischat. „Gehirn“ und Gründer dieser internationalen kriminellen Gruppe GOMOPA. Herr Klaus Maurischat wurde am selben Tag auch festgenommen und auf Frist verhaftet, wird bald in Anklagezustand gestellt, wird die Verantwortung für eigene Straftaten und die des Forums GOMOPA vor einem zuständigen Bundesgericht tragen. Die Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. unternahm bereits alle möglichen Schritte, damit Herr Klaus Maurischat auch auf der Anklagebank des zuständigen Gerichts des Vereinigten Königsreiches Großbritannien erscheint. Unter den beschädigten Berufs- und Justizpersonen aus Großbritannien, neben der Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. gibt es noch viele Opfer von GOMOPA:
Der Begin der Verhaftungen mit so einem Ausmaß bedeutet für die deutsche Justiz einen ausschlaggebenden und bahnbrechenden Punkt. Bemerkenswert ist, dass die Verfolgungsorgane der Bundesrepublik sich bis zu diesem Zeitpunkt der langjährigen kriminellen Tätigkeit des Herrn Klaus Maurischat und seiner Mitarbeiter machtlos zeigten.
Die langdauernde Straflosigkeit des kriminellen Vorgehens des Herrn Klaus Maurischat, der jahrelang die „Erste Geige” bei GOMOPA spielte, ist zu Ende gegangen.
An dieser Stelle taucht noch eine Frage auf: wie wird’s weiter gehen?
Die Festnahme des Herrn Klaus Maurischat ist ein ausschlaggebender Moment, anders gesagt eine „Wende um 180 Grad” für ihn persönlich. Es bedeutet aber auch den „Anfang vom Ende“ für seine Mitarbeiter, für die Internetservices, Bloggers, die mit GOMOPA so gerne und ohne Widerspruch zusammengearbeitet hatten. Es unterliegt keinem Zweifel, dass die Sache vom Herrn Klaus Maurischat an der Spitze des „Eisbergs” steht. Der oben erwähnte Wendepunkt zu dieser Frage wird weitere Festnahmen und Verhaftungen der GOMOPA-Mitglieder mit sich bringen, sowie aller Personen aus allen möglichen Gebieten, die an diesem grenzüberschreitenden kriminellen Vorgehen teilgenommen haben.
Aus Informationen, welche der Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. vorliegen, resultiert, dass die nächsten Festnahmen aktuell vorbreitet werden, die mit dem Services GOMOPA zusammenarbeitende Personen betreffen. Dies wird auf Personen außerhalb Deutschland – von wo der Herr Klaus Maurischat kommt – bezug nehmen. Die Einzelheiten dürfen an dieser Stelle in Hinblick auf Rechtsgut und Verlauf der durch die Verfolgungsorgane der BRG und der INTERPOL geführten Untersuchung leider nicht verraten werden.
Die Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. kann momentan lediglich eine verbindliche Information aus der geführten Untersuchung der Öffentlichkeit bekannt geben, die die strafrechtliche Haftung nicht zu Folge haben wird.
In diesem Moment also werden intensive Vorbereitungen auf Verhaftung einer Reihe von Personen außerhalb der Bundesrepublik Deutschland getroffen.
Dies betrifft insbesondere folgende Länder wie:
– Russische Föderation
– die Ukraine
– Polen
– Spanien
– Mexiko
– Portugal
– Brasilien
– die Vereinigten Staaten von Amerika
– Kanada
– Großbritannien
– Irland
– Australien
– New Seeland
– Indien.
Alle Berufs- und Justizpersonen, unabhängig vom Land, in dem sie das Amt begleiten, oder dessen Bürger sind, und die bis jetzt bewusst oder unbewusst mit dem Forum GOMOPA zusammengearbeitet haben, oder weiterhin zusammenarbeiten, erregen den Verdacht der Internationalen Polizei INTERPOL. Diese Polizei arbeitet mit der Kriminalpolizei in jedem Land, um die oben erwähnten Personen zuerst identifizieren und dann die juristisch verfolgen zu können.
Informationen zu diesem Thema, sowie über Anfang und Ende der Tätigkeit des GOMOPA kann man unter folgenden Adressen im Netz lesen:
– http://gomopaabzocker.wordpress.com/
– http://www.nepper-schlepper-bauernfaenger.com
– http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qNpzAu-QMuE
– http://www.korte.de/alexander/2006/01/gomopa-finanforum-kritik.html
– http://evelux.de/gomopa-sam-240/
– http://blog.deobald.org/archive/2007/07/01/betrugsvorwurf-gomopa-spam/
2. Dubai
KLP Group Emirates – Vereinigte Arabische Emiraten. Als Chef der Firma gilt HerrMartin Kraeter, der nicht nur als „Gehirn” des ganzen Unternehmens, sondern auch als langjähriger Freund des Herrn Klaus Maurischat (GOMOPA-Leiter) fungiert.
Diese Firma will nicht einmal verbergen und gibt offiziell zu, dass sie als strategischer Partner des GOMOPA auf dem Gebiet des Nahen Ostens, dem entsprechend das Gebiet der Persischen Küste tätig ist.
Die offizielle Tätigkeit der Firma KLP Group Emirates umfasst unter anderem folgende Bereiche: Finanzberatung auch aus dem Off-Shore Bereich (Management Services – Facilitators – OffshoreConsultants, International Tax & Legal Consultants – Fiduciaries). Im Tätigkeitsbereich der Firma kommt auch die Gründung von Firmen und Unternehmen in den so genannten „Steuerparadiesen” vor, um der Steuerpflicht zu entfliehen.
Die inoffizielle Tätigkeit der Firma KLP Group Emirates umfasst unter anderem die Zusammenarbeit mit dem Service GOMOPA im Bereich der „Geldwäsche”. Die Gelder werden infolge der kriminellen Handlungen durch GOMOPA generiert, durch vorgeschobene Berufs- und Justizpersonen demnächst über die ganze Welt verbreitet und legalisiert.
Die auf die Gesetzwidrigkeit beruhende Tätigkeit der Firma KLP Group Emirates sowie die Kooperation mit dem Services GOMOPA erregten Aufmerksamkeit auch bei den Verfolgungsorganen des Vereinigten Königreiches Großbritannien, vor allem bei Scotland Yard, das zu dieser Frage ein intensives Ermittlungsverfahren eingeleitet hat, welches sich in der „Entwicklungsphase“ befindet. Es muss angemerkt werden, dass alle Berufs- und Justizpersonen, vor allem aber die Kunden der Firma KLP Group Emirates, die mit der Firma KLP Group Emirates in Vergangenheit zusammengearbeitet haben und dies immer noch tun, unter die „Luppe“ des Scotland Yard genommen werden.
3. Russland
a) Die Firma E-xecutive wird von dem Herrn Vilen Novosartow geleitet. Die auf der Homepage der Firma enthaltenen Informationen kommen direkt von der FirmaGOMOPA. Die Firma E-xecutive führt die enge Zusammenarbeit nicht nur mitGOMOPA, sondern auch mit einer weiteren auf dem russischen Gebiet unter dem Namen OOO VK Broker funktionierenden Firma. Die Firma E-xecutive im Zusammenhang mit der Firma OOO VK Broker ist Mitglied einer kriminellen Gruppe unter der Leitung von GOMOPA. Die Firma E-xecutive vertritt Interessen von GOMOPA in Russland und in Mittel- und Osteuropa.
Inoffiziell beschäftigt sich die Firma E-xecutive insbesondere mit der Suche nach potenziellen „Opfern” des Erschwindelns, der Erpressung und Erzwingung der Gelder für GOMOPA von Firmen und Korporationen aus dem Gebieten Russland, Ukraine, sowie aus allen Staaten in Mittel-Osteuropa.
Offiziell führt die Firma E-xecutive eine dem Forum GOMOPA ähnliche Gewerbetätigkeit.
b) OOO «VK Broker». Leiter der Firma ist der Herr Pavel Kokarev. Diese Firma verheimlicht es nicht, dass sie mit dem Forum GOMOPA zusammenarbeitet. Die FirmaOOO VK Broker vertritt GOMOPA in Mittel-Osteuropa, auch in Russland. Sie übt offiziell auf diesem Gebiet dem GOMOPA ähnliche Tätigkeit aus, inoffiziell aber ist sie mit der Suche nach potenziellen „Opfern“ der Erpressung, des Betrugs und des Erschwindelns für GOMOPA beschäftigt. Die Firma blieb bis jetzt von jeder Strafe verschont, konnte mit „ewiger Straflosigkeit” wegen eines schlecht ausgearbeiteten, korrupten Rechtswesens in Russland rechnen. Die Situation kann sich jedoch ändern, nachdem Herr Klaus Maurischat in Berlin festgenommen und verhaftet worden ist. Dieser ständige Straftäter, der „auf seinem Konto” eine Reihe von rechtskräftigen Urteilen hat, der bis jetzt seine Freiheit unbegrenzt genossen hat, dementsprechend nicht weiß, was es bedeutet verhaftet zu werden, beginnt nach und nach laut uns zur Verfügung stehenden Angaben endlich „sein Zeugnis abzulegen“. Dies ist verständlich, wenn man die ihm drohende hohe Strafe berücksichtigt. Dieser Delinquent zeigt dabei immer größeres Interesse an der Zusammenarbeit mit den deutschen Verfolgungs- und Ermittlungsorganen. Es besteht also die Chance, dass er weitere Personen der Öffentlichkeit enthüllt, indem er auf Minderung der Gefängnisstrafe rechnet. Es ist auch nur die Frage der Zeit, wann INTERPOL in Zusammenarbeit mit der Russischen (FSB) der Firma OOO VK Broker „an die Tür klopft”, welche durch den Herrn Pavl Kokarev geführt und vertreten wird.
Die Firma OOO VK Broker besitzt ein virtuelles Buero im REGUS-Gebäude in Moskau, stellt nicht einmal eine Person an und bildet eine typische Ein-Person-Firma, die alle geschäftlichen „Delikte“ firmieren kann, wobei sie keine zivil-rechtliche Haftung trägt. Der Herr Pavel Kokarev scheint „vergessen zu haben” oder besitzt kein ausreichendes Wissen für seine eventuelle Verantwortung fier die Teilnahme an den internationalen Verbrechen unter Leitung von GOMOPA.
Mein Name ist Bernd Pulch, ich bin von Rechts wegen Magister.
Link zu meiner Magister-Arbeit
http://www.kepplinger.de/search/node/pulch
und
http://www.kepplinger.de/node/50
Ich bin der Erbe unseres Familienbuches und damit das Oberhaupt unserer Familie Pulch. Unsere Familie hat seit Jahrunderten in Deutschland, USA und vielen anderen Ländern, erfolgreiche Unternehmer, Staatssekretäre, Banker, Richter, Anwälte, Politiker und auch Journalisten hervorgebracht. Wir lassen unseren guten Namen nicht durch vorbestrafte Anlagebetrüger, Cybermörder und Stasi/NS-Kriminelle verunglimpfen. Deren Taten und Fäkalsprache sprechen für sich und bedürfen keiner ernsthaften Auseinandersetzung.
Die bezahlten Betrüger sollen die Kapitalanlage-Verbrecher schützen.
Darum geht es im Kern. Wie auch schon unter
http://sjb-fonds-opfer.com/?page_id=11764
klar ersichtlich.
Der neueste Coup der Verbrecher, Sie kopieren unsere Belege und wollen weiter Verunsicherung säen.
Dies wird Ihnen nicht gelingen.
Hier ist der Original-Bericht von Meridian Capital
http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:8jmni-h2e_4J:www.maurischatinhaft.wordpress.com/+verhaftung+klaus+maurischat&cd=2&hl=de&ct=clnk&gl=de&source=www.google.de
Ich werde die kriminellen Verantwortlichen und ihre kriminellen Helfershelfer bis zur letzten Konsequenz zur Verantwortung ziehen.
Magister Bernd Pulch
PS Ich bedanke mich bei investment-on.com sowie allen anderen Medien für die Möglichkeit, die Dinge gerade zu rücken.
Become a Patron!
True Information is the most valuable resource and we ask you to give back.
THE ONLY WEBSITE WITH THE LICENSE TO SPY!
The Kremlin operatives who were loyal to one man… a paranoid dictator who spied as intensely on his Allies as he did on his enemies. Features exclusive interviews with former KGB/NKVD intelligence officers and other eyewitnesses to the most ruthless dictator of the 20th century.
Become a Patron!
True Information is the most valuable resource and we ask you to give back.
THE ONLY WEBSITE WITH THE LICENSE TO SPY!
On September 19th 2008 high-rank security officer Herman Simm was arrested for delivering thousands of top secret documents to Russia. His job was to protect secrets, but instead, he ended up selling them to the Kremlin.
This is an astonishing account of how a former Soviet militia officer rose to become among the few to safeguard the most intimate secrets in the Western World’s military alliance and after becoming a decorated member of the power elite ended up as a deep mole working for the other side for over 13 years – causing the biggest clash between Western and Russian intelligence services after the Cold War. This is the inside story of Russia’s highest-ranking spy in NATO. Never before told by first-hand witnesses.
Become a Patron!
True Information is the most valuable resource and we ask you to give back.
THE ONLY WEBSITE WITH THE LICENSE TO SPY!
Become a Patron!
True Information is the most valuable resource and we ask you to give back.
THE ONLY WEBSITE WITH THE LICENSE TO SPY!
Become a Patron!
True Information is the most valuable resource and we ask you to give back.
THE ONLY WEBSITE WITH THE LICENSE TO SPY!
Become a Patron!
True Information is the most valuable resource and we ask you to give back.
THE ONLY WEBSITE WITH THE LICENSE TO SPY!
Become a Patron!
True Information is the most valuable resource and we ask you to give back.
THE ONLY WEBSITE WITH THE LICENSE TO SPY!
What happens when a Soviet spy decides his American life is the best fit? Author Jack Barsky, the longest-surviving known member of the KGB illegals program that operated during the Cold War, shares his memoir, “Deep Undercover: My Secret Life & Tangled Allegiances as a KGB Spy in America.
Become a Patron!
True Information is the most valuable resource and we ask you to give back.
THE ONLY WEBSITE WITH THE LICENSE TO SPY!
Russia is accused of trying to influence the US election, which led to the Trump presidency. In a rare interview one of the Soviet Union’s highest-ranking KGB spies talks about the long-standing practice of subverting Western democracy.
Become a Patron!
True Information is the most valuable resource and we ask you to give back.
THE ONLY WEBSITE WITH THE LICENSE TO SPY!
“For so many years, two persons were inside of me,” says Deniss Metsavas, a former Russian spy. Here, Metsavas tells his disturbing story of espionage, blackmail, and double identity for the very first time.
Become a Patron!
True Information is the most valuable resource and we ask you to give back.
THE ONLY WEBSITE WITH THE LICENSE TO SPY!
The KGB is one of the most feared organizations in history, causing untold amounts of trouble during the Cold War and during the reign of the USSR. But with files always being declassified, just what secrets have been uncovered? These are 10 Declassified Secrets of the KGB.
Become a Patron!
True Information is the most valuable resource and we ask you to give back.
THE ONLY WEBSITE WITH THE LICENSE TO SPY!
Become a Patron!
True Information is the most valuable resource and we ask you to give back.
THE ONLY WEBSITE WITH THE LICENSE TO SPY!
Become a Patron!
True Information is the most valuable resource and we ask you to give back.
In the next episode of Declassified: Untold Stories of American Spies, learn about the story of how the CIA recruited Soviet diplomat Aleksandr Ogorodnik, codename TRIGON, to capture intelligence on the Soviet Union during the peak of the Cold War conflict.
Become a Patron!
True Information is the most valuable resource and we ask you to give back.
Jack Barsky is a former sleeper agent of the KGB who spied on the US from 1978 to 1988. After being exposed, he turned FBI informant and has since stayed in the United States, becoming a published author of “Deep Undercover” and an expert on espionage and Russian intelligence.
He was recruited into the KGB after being approached by a member of the East German secret police at the University of Jena in 1969. Barsky rates the realism of Russian spying tactics such as message interception, surveillance, and sleeper cells in “The Fourth Protocol” (1987), “Anna” (2019), “Bridge of Spies” (2015), “Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy” (2011), and the popular TV show “The Americans” (2013-2018).
He also breaks down physical training and spies’ backgrounds in “Red Sparrow” (2018), “Salt” (2010), and Black Widow’s first on-screen appearance in “Iron Man 2” (2010). He also discusses the Bond movie franchise and its depiction of Russian spies in “From Russia With Love” (1963).
Become a Patron!
True Information is the most valuable resource and we ask you to give back.
In 1985, an American FBI agent began to sell intelligence to the Russians, under the alias of Ramon Garcia. It would be another 16 years before he was finally arrested by the FBI. From the Series: Spy Wars with Damian Lewis: A Perfect Traitor https://bit.ly/3bqZhB6
Become a Patron!
True Information is the most valuable resource and we ask you to give back.
Liebe Leser,
Aktenzeichen ST/0148943/2011: Immer wieder verfremden die vorbestraften Serienbetrüger Pressemeldungen von uns und der SJB-GoMoPa-Opfer und verfälschen sie, um Verwirrung zu stiften und von ihren eigenen Taten abzulenken. Die persönlichen Angriffe gegen mich und andere Personen aus meinem Umfeld, sollen uns dazu bewegen, die kritischen Berichte über die Cyber-Stasi des 21. Jahrhunderts und deren Hintermänner einzustellen, sowie sie zuvor viele andere Journalisten eingeschüchtert haben, so dass deren Beiträge dann gelöscht wurden. Im Interesse aller Marktteilnehmer werden wir das ganz gewiss NICHT tun. Dies ist uns vielmehr ein Ansporn und eine Verpflichtung, die Öffentlichkeit über das Treiben der Cybermörder und wohl auch realen Mörder aufzuklären, damit diesen Stasi-Verbrechern, das Handwerk gelegt wird und sie nicht noch mehr rechtschaffene Menschen mit ihrem hahnebüchernen Unsinn verleumden, erpressen, betrügen und sie dann sogar ermorden können. Deshalb hier noch einmal zur Klarstellung: Der vorbestrafte Erpresser, Betrüger und wohl auch mutmassliche Mörder Heinz Gerlachs Klaus-Dieter Maurischat ist auf der Flucht.
Bereits einmal, im Dezember 2008, wurde er in Berlin auf Betreiben von Meridian Capital festgenommen. Zuvor sind er und sein mutmasslicher Komplize laut Meridian Capital bereits 23 verurteilt worden. Näheres zu Maurischat: Über eine selbstgebaute Blogseite verbreiten die GoMoPa-Gangster eine gefälschte Stellung von Meridian Capital, um Verwirrung zu stiften. Diese Blogseite existiert erst seit Deztember 2010. Beweis: http://www.hypestat.com/pressreleaser.org Die Meridian Capital-Seite, das Original, http://othergomopa.blogspot.com/ ist dagegen bereits seit 2009 online Beweis: Aussage Meridian Capital und KLAUS DIETER MAURISCHAT IN DETENTION
Source: http://klaus-dieter-maurischat.blogspot.com/2009/01/klaus-dieter-maurischat-in-haft.html Hinzu kommt Verurteilung wegen Betruges am eigenen Anleger sowie die Kursmanipulation in Sachen Wirecard etc pp.- Hier exemplarisch die Verurteilung wegen Betruges am eigenen Anleger: Klaus Maurischat und Mark Vornkahl, Betreiber vonwww.gomopa.net: Am 24. April 2006 war die Verhandlung am Amtsgericht Krefeld in der Betrugssache: Mark Vornkahl / Klaus Maurischat ./. Dehnfeld. Aktenzeichen: 28 Ls 85/05 Klaus MaurischatLange Straße 3827313 Dörverden.Das in diesem Verfahren ausschließlich diese Betrugsache verhandelt wurde, ist das Urteil gegen Klaus Maurischat recht mäßig ausgefallen.
Herzlichst Ihr
Magister Bernd Pulch
Become a Patron!
True Information is the most valuable resource and we ask you to give back.
Become a Patron!
True Information is the most valuable resource and we ask you to give back.
Liebe Leser,
wie verrückt löschen die feigen STASI-Serienbetrüger und Ihre Hintermänner kritische Artikel über sie – auch unter dem Suchbegriff “Bernd Pulch”.
Die Einträge die Google gelöscht hat, waren in 90% der Fälle kritische Einträge über “GoMoPa”.
Kritisch püber uns haben sich nur “gomopa.net” und der “Sch****hausfliegenblog” von Maurischat geäussert.
Nach wie vor – besser jetzt erst recht sind die bekannten Anwälte und Hintermänner dabei ihre Taten zu vertuschen. Diesmal wird es aber nicht gelingen !
Die absurden Behauptung der Gegenseite lassen wir indes weitgehend unberührt stehen, damit Sie sich, werte Leser, ein eigenes Bild machen können.
Die im Google-Index gelöschten Beiträge von uns sind weiter auf unseren Webseiten zu finden, bis auf einige ältere INVESTMENT-Artikel aus dem letzten Jahr, die wir im Zuge einer Suchmachinen -Optimierung herausgenommen haben, da die entsprechende Rubrik “people, chat & news” gelöscht wurde.
Diese Artikel werden zeitnah wieder eingestellt und sind damit auch wieder indexiert – zumindest bis die “Anwälte” der Gegenseite sich bei Google melden.
Offensichtlich haben sie beste Verbindungen zu Google. Deswegen haben wir auch Strafanzeige gegen Google gestellt, denn ohne deren “Beihilfe” wäre das “Geschäftsmodell “GoMoPa” nicht möglich.
Wir wissen, dass Klaus-Dieter Maurischat und die “GoMoPa”-Bande den Befehl von ihren Hintermännern erhielt abzutauchen, um der Verhaftung zu entgehen.
Bei der Verhaftung würden sicher der eine oder andere Scherge “auspacken”…
We keep you informed.
Herzliche Grüsse
Magister Bernd Pulch
Become a Patron!
True Information is the most valuable resource and we ask you to give back.
German criminal police (Kriminalpolizei) has opened new cases against the notorious “GoMoPa” organisation which already fled in the underground.
On our request the German criminal police (Kriminalpolizei) has opened new cases against the notorious “GoMoPa” organisation which already fled in the underground. Insiders say they have killed German journalist and watchdog Heinz Gerlach and their criminal record is bigger than the
Encyclopedia – Britannica
The case is also directed against Google, Germany, whilst supporting criminal action of “GoMoPa” for years and therefore give them the chance to blackmail successfull businessman. This case is therefore an example and will be followed by many others as far as we can project. Furthermore we will bring the case to the attention of the German lawyers community which will not tolerate such misconduct by Googles German legal representative Dr. Arndt Haller and we will bring the case to the attention of Google Inc in Mountain View, USA, and the American ministry of Justice to stop the Cyberstalkers once and for all.
Besides that many legal institutions, individuals and firms have already contacted us to help to clarify the death of Mr. Heinz Gerlach and to prosecute his murderers and their backers.
The case number is
ST/0148943/2011
Stasi-Dioxin: The “NACHRICHTENDIENST” searching for the perfect murder
Viktor Yushchenko was running against Prime Minister Viktor Yanukovych. Yanukovych was a political ally of outgoing president Leonid Kuchma. Kuchma’s administration depended upon corruption and dishonesty for its power. Government officials ruled with a sense of terror rather than justice. For the powerful and wealthy few, having Yanukovych elected president was important. Should Yushchenko win, Ukraine’s government was sure to topple. Yushchenko’s campaign promises included a better quality of life for Ukrainians through democracy. His wife, Katherine, told CBS in a 2005 interview, “He was a great threat to the old system, where there was a great deal of corruption, where people were making millions, if not billions.”
On September 6, 2004, Yushchenko became ill after dining with leaders of the Ukrainian secret police. Unlike other social or political engagements, this dinner did not include anyone else on Yushchenko’s team. No precautions were taken regarding the food. Within hours after the dinner, Yushchenko began vomiting violently. His face became paralyzed; he could not speak or read. He developed a severe stomachache and backache as well as gastrointestinal pain. Outwardly, Yushchenko developed what is known as chloracne, a serious skin condition that leaves the face scarred and disfigured.
By December 2004, doctors had determined that Yushchenko had been the victim of dioxin poisoning. Dioxin is a name given to a group of related toxins that can cause cancer and even death. Dioxin was used in the biochemical weapon called Agent Orange during the Vietnam War controversial war in which the United States aidedSouth Vietnam in its fight against a takeover by Communist North Vietnam). Yushchenko had a dioxin level six thousand times greater than that normally found in the bloodstream. His is the second-highest level ever recorded.
Yushchenko immediately suspected he had been poisoned, though Kuchma’s camp passionately denied such allegations. Instead, when Yushchenko showed up at a parliamentary meeting shortly after the poisoning incident, Kuchma’s men teased him, saying he must have had too much to drink or was out too late the night before.
Dioxin can stay in the body for up to thirty-five years. Experts predict that his swelling and scars will fade but never completely disappear. John Henry, a toxicologist at London’s Imperial Hospital, told RedNova.com, “It’ll be a couple of years, and he will always be a bit pockmarked. After damage as heavy as that, I think he will not return to his film star looks.” And Yushchenko will live with the constant threat of cancer.
At first it was believed the poison must have come from a Russian laboratory. Russia was a strong supporter of Kuchma and lobbied against Yushchenko in the 2004 election. But by July 2005, Yushchenko’s security forces were able to trace the poison to a lab in Ukraine. Though not entirely ruling out Russia’s involvement, Yushchenko is quoted on his Web site as saying “I’m sure that even though some people are running from the investigation, we will get them. I am not afraid of anything or anybody.”
Evidence shows that such a perfect murder plotted by former Stasi agents is the cause of the death of German watchdog and journalist Heinz Gerlach.
The Ministry for State Security (German: Ministerium für Staatssicherheit (MfS), commonly known as the Stasi (IPA: [ˈʃtaziː]) (abbreviation German: Staatssicherheit, literally State Security), was the official state security service of East Germany. The MfS was headquartered in East Berlin, with an extensive complex in Berlin-Lichtenberg and several smaller facilities throughout the city. It was widely regarded as one of the most effective and repressive intelligence and secret police agencies in the world. The MfS motto was “Schild und Schwert der Partei” (Shield and Sword of the Party), that is the ruling Socialist Unity Party of Germany (SED).
According to the confessions of an informer, Berlin lawyer Jochen Resch writes most of the “articles” of the communist “STASI” agency “GoMoPa” himself or it is done by lawyers of his firm. The whistleblower states that lawyer Resch is the mastermind behind the “CYBER-STASI” called “NACHRICHTENDIENST” “GoMoPa”. Bizarre enough they use Jewish names of non-existing Jewish lawyers by the name of “Goldman, Morgenstern and Partner” to stage their bogus “firm”. Further involved in their complots are a “detective” Medard Fuchsgruber and “STASI”-Colonel Ehrenfried Stelzer, “the first crime expert” in the former communist East-Germany.
According to London based Meridian Capital hundreds and thousands of wealthy people and companies have paid to the “NACHRICHTENDIENST” to avoid their cyberstalking (see article below).
Finally the German criminal police started their investigations (case number ST/0148943/2011).
The “NACHRICHTENDIENST” is also involved in the death of the well-known German watchdog and journalist Heinz Gerlach who died under strange circumstances in July 2010.
Only hours after his death the “NACHRICHTENDIENST” was spreading the news that Mr Gerlach died of blood pollution and set the stage for a fairy tale. Months before his death the “NACHRICHTENDIENST” started a campaign to ruin his reputation and presumably was also responsable for cyberattacks to bring his website down. In fact they presumably used the same tactics also against our servers. Therefore we investigated all internet details of them and handed the facts to the FBI and international authorities.
Story background:
Now it seems the STASI is back again in business after transforming it in to the CYBER-STASI of the 21st Century.
The serial betrayer and cyberstalker Klaus Maurischat is on the run again. The latest action against him (see below) cause him to react in a series of fake statements and “press releases” – one more absurd than the other. Insider analyze that his criminal organisation “GoMoPa” is about to fade away.
On our request the German criminal police (Kriminalpolizei) has opened new cases against the notorious “GoMoPa” organisation which already fled in the underground. Insiders say they have killed German journalist and watchdog Heinz Gerlach and their criminal record is bigger than the Encyclopedia – Britannica
The case is also directed against Google, Germany, whilst supporting criminal action of “GoMoPa” for years and therefore give them the chance to blackmail successfull businessman. This case is therefore an example and will be followed by many others as far as we can project. Furthermore we will bring the case to the attention of the German lawyers community which will not tolerate such misconduct by Googles German legal representative Dr. Arndt Haller and we will bring the case to the attention of Google Inc in Mountain View, USA, and the American ministry of Justice to stop the Cyberstalkers once and for all.
Besides that many legal institutions, individuals and firms have already contacted us to help to clarify the death of Mr. Heinz Gerlach and to prosecute his murderers and their backers.
The case number is ST/0148943/2011
In a series of interviews beginning 11 months before the sudden death of German watchdog Heinz Gerlach Berlin lawyer Joschen Resch unveilved secrets of Gerlach, insiders say. Secret documents from Mr Gerlachs computer were published on two dubious hostile German websites. Both have a lot of similarities in their internet registration. One the notorious “GoMoPa” website belongs to a n Eastern German organization which calls itself “
Numerous attempts have been made to stop our research and the publication of the stories by “GoMoPa” members in camouflage thus confirming the truth and the substance of it in a superior way.
Only two articles let the German audience believe that the famous journalist and watchdog Heinz Gerlach died on natural courses by blood pollution. The first one, published only hours after the death of Mr Heinz Gerlach by the notorious “GoMoPa” (see article below) and a second 3 days later by a small German local newspaper, Weserbergland Nachrichten.
Many people including the hostile Gerlach website “Akte Heinz Gerlach” doubted that this man who had so many enemies and friends would die of natural causes without any previous warning. Rumours occured that Mr. Gerlach’s doctor doubted natural courses at all. After many critical voices discussed the issue a small website of a small German local newspaper – which never before had reported about Mr. Heinz Gerlach and which is not even in the region of Mr Gerlachs home – published that Mr Gerlach died of blood pollution. Weserbergland-Nachrichten published a long article about the deadly consequences of blood pollution and did not even name the source of such an important statement. It claimed only that somebody of Gerlachs inner circle had said this. It is a proven fact that after the collpase of the Eastern German Communist Regime many former Communist propaganda agents went to regional newspapers – often in Western Germany like Günther Schabowski did the man who opened the “Mauer”.
The theatre stage was set: One day later the hostile Gerlach website “Akte Heinz Gerlach” took the agenda publishing that Mr Gerlach had died for natural causes without any further research at all.
This was done by a website which for months and months and months reported everything about Mr. Gerlach.
Furthermore a research proves that the technical details regarding the website hosting of this hostile website “Akte Heinz Gerlach” proves that there are common details with the hosting of “GoMoPa” and their affiliates as proven by the SJB-GoMoPa-victims (see http://www.sjb-fonds-opfer.com)
Insiders believe that the murderers of Mr. Heinz Gerlach are former members of the Eastern German Terror Organisation “Stasi” with dioxins. They also believe that “GoMoPa” was part of the plot. At “GoMoPa”’ a person named Siegfried Siewers was officialy responsible for the press but never appeared in public. “GoMoPa”-victims say that this name was a cameo for “GoMoPa” frontrunner Klaus Maurischat who is controlled by the Stasi Top Agent Ehrenfried Stelzner, Berlin.
Siegfried Sievers, a former Stasi member is responsible for the pollution of millions Germanys for many years with dioxins. This was unveiled at 5th of January 2011 by German prosecutors.
The victims say that Maurischat (probably also a Stasi cameo) and Sievers were in contact as Sievers acted as Stasi Agent and was in fact already a specialist in dioxins under the Communist Terror Regime in Eastern Germany.
Furthermore the Stasi Top Agent Ehrenfried Stelzer disguised as Professor for Criminal studies during the Communist Regime at the Eastern Berlin Humboldt University.
Background:
The man behind the Berlin lawyer Jochen Resch and his activities is Ehrenfried Stelzer, former Stasi Top officer in Berlin and “Professor for Criminal Studies” at the Eastern Berlin Humboldt University during the Communist regime, the SJB-GoMoPa-victims say (www.sjb-fonds-opfer.com) is responsable for the killing of German watchdog and journalist Heinz Gerlach.
These informations stem from various sources who were close to the criminal organization of GoMoPa in the last years. The SJB-GoMoPa say that the well-known German watchdog and journalist Heinz Gerlach was killed by former Stasi members with dioxins. Polychlorinated dibenzodioxins (PCDDs), or simply dioxins, are a group of organic polyhalogenated compounds that are significant because they act as environmental pollutants. They are commonly referred to as dioxins for simplicity in scientific publications because every PCDD molecule contains a dioxin skeletal structure. Typically, the p-dioxin skeleton is at the core of a PCDD molecule, giving the molecule a dibenzo-p-dioxin ring system. Members of the PCDD family have been shown to bioaccumulate in humans and wildlife due to their lipophilic properties, and are known teratogens, mutagens, and confirmed (avered) human carcinogens. They are organic compounds.
Dioxins build up primarily in fatty tissues over time (bioaccumulate), so even small exposures may eventually reach dangerous levels. In 1994, the US EPA reported that dioxins are a probable carcinogen, but noted that non-cancer effects (reproduction and sexual development, immune system) may pose an even greater threat to human health. TCDD, the most toxic of the dibenzodioxins, is classified as a Group 1 carcinogen by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC).
In 2004, a notable individual case of dioxin poisoning, Ukrainian politician Viktor Yushchenko was exposed to the second-largest measured dose of dioxins, according to the reports of the physicians responsible for diagnosing him. This is the first known case of a single high dose of TCDD dioxin poisoning, and was diagnosed only after a toxicologist recognized the symptoms of chloracne while viewing television news coverage of his condition.
German dioxin scandal: In January 2011 about 4700 German farms were banned from making deliveries after tests at the Harles und Jentzsch plant in the state of Schleswig-Holstein showed high levels of dioxin. Again this incident appears to involve PCBs and not PCDDs at all. Dioxin were found in animal feed and eggs in many farms. The person who is responsible for this, Siegfried Sievert is also a former Stasi Agent. At “GoMoPa” the notorious Eastern-Berlin press agency (see article below) one of the henchmen acted under the name of “Siegfried Siewert”.
Further evidence for the killing of Mr.Heinz Gerlach is provided by the SJB-GoMoPa-victims by analyzing the dubious role of former Stasi-Top-agent Ehrenfried Stelzer, also a former “Professor for Crime Studies” under the Communist regime in Eastern Germany and the dubious role of “detective” Medard Fuchsgruber. Both are closely tied to the dubious “GoMoPa” and Berlin lawyer Jochen Resch.
According to the SJB-GoMoPa-victims is Berlin lawyer Jochen Resch the mastermind of the criminal organization “GoMoPa2. The victims state that they have a source inside “GoMoPa” who helped them discover the shocking truth. The so-called “Deep Throat from Berlin” has information that Resch had the idea to found the criminal organization “GoMoPa” and use non-existing Jewish lawyers named Goldman, Morgenstern & Partner as camouflage. Their “office” in Madison Avenue, New York, is a mailbox. This is witnessed by a German Ex-Patriot, a lawyer, whose father, Heinz Gerlach, died under strange circumstances.
Resch seems to use “GoMoPa” as an instrument to blackmail parts of the German Property and Investment section.
-“Worse than the Gestapo.” —Simon Wiesenthal, Nazi hunter said about the notorious “Stasi”.
Less than a month after German demonstrators began to tear down the Berlin Wall on November 9, 1989, irate East German citizens stormed the Leipzig district office of the Ministry for State Security (MfS)—the Stasi, as it was more commonly called. Not a shot was fired, and there was no evidence of “street justice” as Stasi officers surrendered meekly and were peacefully led away. The following month, on January 15, hundreds of citizens sacked Stasi headquarters in Berlin. Again there was no bloodshed. The last bit of unfinished business was accomplished on May 31 when the Stasi radioed its agents in West Germany to fold their tents and come home.
The intelligence department of the Nationale Volksarmee (NVA), the People’s Army, had done the same almost a week earlier, but with what its members thought was better style. In-stead of sending the five-digit code groups that it had used for decades to message its spies in West Germany, the army group broadcast a male choir singing a children’s ditty about a duck swimming on a lake. There was no doubt that the singing spymasters had been drowning their sorrow over losing the Cold War in schnapps. The giggling, word-slurring songsters repeated the refrain three times: “Dunk your little head in the water and lift your little tail.” This was the signal to agents under deep cover that it was time to come home.
With extraordinary speed and political resolve, the divided nation was reunified a year later. The collapse of the despotic regime was total. It was a euphoric time for Germans, but reunification also produced a new national dilemma. Nazi war crimes were still being tried in West Germany, forty-six years after World War II. Suddenly the German government was faced with demands that the communist officials who had ordered, executed, and abetted crimes against their own people—crimes that were as brutal as those perpetrated by their Nazi predecessors—also be prosecuted.
The people of the former Deutsche Demokratische Republik (DDR), the German Democratic Republic, as the state had called itself for forty years, were clamoring for instant revenge. Their wrath was directed primarily against the country’s communist rulers—the upper echelon of the Sozialistische Einheitspartei (SED), the Socialist Unity Party. The tens of thousands of second-echelon party functionaries who had enriched themselves at the expense of their cocitizens were also prime targets for retribution.
Particularly singled out were the former members of the Stasi, the East German secret police, who previously had considered themselves the “shield and sword” of the party. When the regime collapsed, the Stasi had 102,000 full-time officers and noncommissioned personnel on its rolls, including 11,000 members of the ministry’s own special guards regiment. Between 1950 and 1989, a total of 274,000 persons served in the Stasi.
The people’s ire was running equally strong against the regular Stasi informers, the inoffizielle Mitarbeiter (IMs). By 1995, 174,000 had been identified as IMs, or 2.5 percent of the total population between the ages of 18 and 60. Researchers were aghast when they found that about 10,000 IMs, or roughly 6 percent of the total, had not yet reached the age of 18. Since many records were destroyed, the exact number of IMs probably will never be determined; but 500,000 was cited as a realistic figure. Former Colonel Rainer Wiegand, who served in the Stasi counterintelligence directorate, estimated that the figure could go as high as 2 million, if occasional stool pigeons were included.
“The Stasi was much, much worse than the Gestapo, if you consider only the oppression of its own people,” according to Simon Wiesenthal of Vienna, Austria, who has been hunting Nazi criminals for half a century. “The Gestapo had 40,000 officials watching a country of 80 million, while the Stasi employed 102,000 to control only 17 million.” One might add that the Nazi terror lasted only twelve years, whereas the Stasi had four decades in which to perfect its machinery of oppression, espionage, and international terrorism and subversion.
To ensure that the people would become and remain submissive, East German communist leaders saturated their realm with more spies than had any other totalitarian government in recent history. The Soviet Union’s KGB employed about 480,000 full-time agents to oversee a nation of 280 million, which means there was one agent per 5,830 citizens. Using Wiesenthal’s figures for the Nazi Gestapo, there was one officer for 2,000 people. The ratio for the Stasi was one secret policeman per 166 East Germans. When the regular informers are added, these ratios become much higher: In the Stasi’s case, there would have been at least one spy watching every 66 citizens! When one adds in the estimated numbers of part-time snoops, the result is nothing short of monstrous: one informer per 6.5 citizens. It would not have been unreasonable to assume that at least one Stasi informer was present in any party of ten or twelve dinner guests.
THE STASI OCTOPUS
Like a giant octopus, the Stasi’s tentacles probed every aspect of life. Full-time officers were posted to all major industrial plants. Without exception, one tenant in every apartment build-ing was designated as a watchdog reporting to an area representative of the Volkspolizei (Vopo), the People’s Police. In turn, the police officer was the Stasi’s man. If a relative or friend came to stay overnight, it was reported. Schools, universities, and hospitals were infiltrated from top to bottom. German academe was shocked to learn that Heinrich Fink, professor of theology and vice chancellor at East Berlin’s Humboldt University, had been a Stasi informer since 1968. After Fink’s Stasi connections came to light, he was summarily fired. Doctors, lawyers, journalists, writers, actors, and sports figures were co-opted by Stasi officers, as were waiters and hotel personnel. Tapping about 100,000 telephone lines in West Germany and West Berlin around the clock was the job of 2,000 officers.
Stasi officers knew no limits and had no shame when it came to “protecting the party and the state.” Churchmen, including high officials of both Protestant and Catholic denomina-tions, were recruited en masse as secret informers. Their offices and confessionals were infested with eavesdropping devices. Even the director of Leipzig’s famous Thomas Church choir, Hans-Joachim Rotch, was forced to resign when he was unmasked as a Spitzel, the people’s pejorative for a Stasi informant.
Absolutely nothing was sacred to the secret police. Tiny holes were bored in apartment and hotel room walls through which Stasi agents filmed their “suspects” with special video cam-eras. Even bathrooms were penetrated by the communist voyeurs.8 Like the Nazi Gestapo, the Stasi was the sinister side of deutsche Gründlichkeit (German thoroughness).
After the Berlin wall came down, the victims of the DDR regime demanded immediate retribution. Ironically, their demands were countered by their fellow Germans in the West who, living in freedom, had diligently built einen demokratischen Rechtsstaat, a democratic state governed by the rule of law. The challenge of protecting the rights of both the victims and the accused was immense, given the emotions surrounding the issue. Government leaders and democratic politicians recognized that there could be no “quick fix” of communist injustices without jeopardizing the entire system of democratic jurisprudence. Moving too rapidly merely to satisfy the popular thirst for revenge might well have resulted in acquittals or mistrials. Intricate jurisdictional questions needed to be resolved with both alacrity and meticulousness. No German government could afford to allow a perpetrator to go free because of a judicial error. The political fallout from any such occurrence, especially in the East, could prove fatal to whatever political party occupied the chancellor’s office in Bonn at the time.
Politicians and legal scholars of the “old federal states,” or West Germany, counseled patience, pointing out that even the prosecution of Nazi criminals had not yet been completed. Before unification, Germans would speak of Vergangenheitsbewältigung (“coming to grips with the past”) when they discussed dealing with Nazi crimes. In the reunited Germany, this word came to imply the communist past as well. The two were considered comparable especially in the area of human rights violations. Dealing with major Nazi crimes, however, was far less complicated for the Germans: Adolf Hitler and his Gestapo and Schutzstaffel (SS) chief, Heinrich Himmler, killed themselves, as did Luftwaffe chief and Vice Chancellor Hermann Göring, who also had been the first chief of the Gestapo. The victorious Allies prosecuted the rest of the top leadership at the International War Crimes Tribunal in Nürnberg. Twelve were hanged, three received life terms, four were sentenced to lesser terms of imprisonment (up to twenty years), and three were acquitted.
The cases of communist judges and prosecutors accused of Rechtsbeugung (perversion of justice) are more problematic. According to Franco Werkenthin, a Berlin legal expert charged with analyzing communist crimes for the German parliament, those sitting in judgment of many of the accused face a difficult task because of the general failure of German justice after World War II. Not a single judge or prosecutor who served the Nazi regime was brought to account for having perverted justice—even those who had handed down death sentences for infringements that in a democracy would have been considered relatively minor offenses. Werkenthin called this phenomenon die Jauche der Justiz, the cesspool of justice.
Of course, the crimes committed by the communists were not nearly as heinous as the Nazis’ extermination of the Jews, or the mass murders in Nazi-occupied territories. However, the communists’ brutal oppression of the nation by means including murder alongside legal execution put the SED leadership on a par with Hitler’s gang. In that sense, Walter Ulbricht or Erich Honecker (Ulbricht’s successor as the party’s secretary-general and head of state) and secret police chief Erich Mielke can justifiably be compared to Hitler and Himmler, respectively.
Arrest warrants were issued for Honecker and Mielke. The Soviet government engineered Honecker’s escape to Moscow, where he became the ward of Soviet President Mikhail S. Gor-bachev. When the Soviet Union crumbled, the new Russian President Boris Yeltsin expelled Honecker. He was arrested on his return to Germany, but a court decided against a trial when he was diagnosed with liver cancer. Honecker flew to Chile with his wife Margot to live with their daughter, a Chilean citizen by marriage. His exile was short, and he died in 1994. Mielke was not so fortunate: His KGB friends turned their backs on him. He was tried in Germany for the 1931 murder of two police officers, found guilty, and sentenced to six years in prison. Other charges, including manslaughter, were dismissed because of his advanced age and poor health.
Three other members of the twenty-one-member ruling Politburo also have been tried. Former Defense Minister Heinz Kessler was convicted of manslaughter in connection with the order to kill people who were trying to escape to the West. He received a seven-and-a-half-year term. Two others, members of the Central Committee and the National Defense Council, were tried with Kessler and sentenced to seven and a half years and five years, respectively. Politburo member Harry Tisch, who was also head of the communist trade union, was found guilty of embezzlement and served eighteen months. Six others, including Egon Krenz (Honecker’s successor as party chief), were charged with manslaughter. Krenz was found guilty, and on August 25, 1997, was sentenced to six and a half years in prison.
However, eight years after reunification, many of the 165 members of the Central Committee have not yet been put under investigation. In 1945, Nazis holding comparable or lesser positions were subject to automatic arrest by the Allies. They spent months or even years in camps while their cases were adjudicated. Moreover, the Nürnberg Tribunal branded the Reich and its Corps of Political Leaders, SS, Security Service (SD), Secret State Police (Gestapo), SA (Storm Troopers), and Armed Forces High Command criminal organizations. Similarly sweeping actions against communist leaders and functionaries such as Stasi officers were never contemplated, even though tens of thousands of political trials and human rights abuses have been documented. After the East German regime fell, German judicial authorities scrupulously avoided the appearance of waging witch-hunts or using the law as a weapon of vengeance. Prosecutors and judges made great efforts to be fair, often suspending legal action while requesting rulings from the supreme court on possible constitutional conflicts.
The victims of oppression clamored for revenge and demanded speedy prosecution of the erstwhile tyrants. They had little patience for a judicial system that was handicapped by a lack of unblemished and experienced criminal investigators, prosecutors, and judges. Despite these handicaps, the Berlin Central Police Investigations Group for Government Criminality, mindful that the statute of limitations for most communist crimes would expire at the end of 1999, made significant progress under its director Manfred Kittlaus, the able former director of the West Berlin state police. Kittlaus’s major task in 1998 was to investigate wrongful deaths, including 73 murders, 30 attempted murders, 583 cases of manslaughter, 2,938 instances of attempted manslaughter, and 425 other suspicious deaths. Of the 73 murders, 22 were classified as contract murders.
One of those tried and convicted for attempted contract murder was former Stasi collaborator Peter Haak, who was sentenced to six and a half years in prison. The fifty-two-year-old Haak took part in the Stasi’s 1981 Operation Scorpion, which was designed to pursue people who helped East Germans escape to the West. Proceedings against former General Gerhard Neiber, whose Stasi directorate was responsible for preventing escapes and for wreaking vengeance, were still pending in 1998.
Peter Haak’s murder plot was hatched after he befriended Wolfgang Welsch and his family. Welsch was a thorn in the side of the Stasi because of his success in smuggling people out of the DDR. Haak joined Welsch and the latter’s wife and seven-year-old daughter on a vacation in Israel, where he mixed a gram of thallium, a highly poisonous metallic chemical element used in rat poison, into the hamburgers he was preparing for a meal. Welsch’s wife and daughter vomited immediately after ingesting the poison and recovered quickly. Welsch suffered severe aftereffects, but eventually recovered: He had consumed a large amount of beer with the meal, and an expert testified that the alcohol had probably flushed the poison from his system.
Berlin Prosecutor General Christoph Schäfgen revealed that after the DDR’s demise 15,200 investigations had been launched, of which more than 9,000 were still active at the beginning of 1995. Indictments were handed down in 153 cases, and 73 perpetrators were convicted. Among those convicted were the aforementioned Politburo members as well as a number of border guards who had killed people who were trying to escape to the West.
Despite widespread misgivings about the judicial failures in connection with some Nazi crimes, a number of judges and prosecutors were convicted and jailed for up to three years for perversion of justice. In collusion with the Stasi, they had requested or handed down more severe sentences in political cases so that the state could collect greater amounts when the “convicts” were ransomed by the West German government. {The amount of ransom paid was governed by the time a prisoner had been sentenced to serve.)
The enormity of the task facing judicial authorities in reunified Germany becomes starkly evident when one examines the actions they have taken in all five former East German prov-inces and in East Berlin. From the end of 1990 to July 1996, 52,050 probes were launched into charges of murder, attempted murder, manslaughter, kidnapping, election fraud, and per-version of justice. A total of 29,557 investigations were halted for various reasons including death, severe illness, old age, or insufficient evidence. In those five and a half years, there were only 139 convictions.
The problem is even more staggering when cases of espionage are included. Between 1990 and 1996, the office of the federal prosecutor general launched 6,641 probes, of which 2,431 were terminated before trial—most due to the statute of limitations. Of 175 indictments on charges of espionage, 95 resulted in convictions. In addition to the cases handled at the federal level, the prosecutor general referred 3,926 investigations to state authorities, who terminated 3,344 without trial. State courts conducted 356 trials, resulting in 248 convictions. Because the statute of limitations for espionage is five years, the prosecutor general’s office told me in 1997 it was unlikely that more espionage trials would be conducted.
It is important to emphasize the difference between the statute’s application to so-called government crimes committed in East Germany before the collapse and to crimes, such as es-pionage, committed in West Germany. The Unification Treaty specifically permits the belated prosecution of individuals who committed acts that were punishable under the East German criminal code and who due to official connivance were not prosecuted earlier. There is no statute of limitations for murder. For most other crimes the limit is five years; however, due to the obstacles created by previous government connivance, the German parliament in 1993 doubled this time limit for prosecution of the more serious crimes. At the same time, the par-liament decreed that all cases must be adjudicated by the end of 2002. For less serious offenses, the statute would have run out on December 31, 1997, but the parliament extended it to 2000.
A number of politicians, jurists, and liberal journalists pleaded for a general amnesty for crimes committed by former DDR leaders and Communist Party functionaries. A former West German supreme court judge, Ernst Mahrenholz, said the “sharp sword of justice prevents reconciliation.” Schäfgen, the Berlin prosecutor general, had this answer for the former high court judge and other amnesty advocates:
I cannot agree. We are raising no special, sharp sword against East Germans. We must pursue state-sponsored injustice in exactly the same manner as we do when a thief steals or when one human being kills another. If one wants to change that, then we would have to do away with the entire criminal justice system, because punishment always hurts. We are not criminalizing an entire people but only an ever shrinking, small portion.
German Foreign Minister Klaus Kinkel, who was West Germany’s minister of justice when the nation was unified, said this at a session of parliament in September 1991: “We must punish the perpetrators. This is not a matter of a victor’s justice. We owe it to the ideal of justice and to the victims. All of those who ordered injustices and those who executed the orders must be punished; the top men of the SED as well as the ones who shot [people] at the wall.” Aware that the feelings against communists were running high among their victims, Kinkel pointed to past revolutions after which the representatives of the old system were collectively liquidated. In the same speech before parliament, he said:
Such methods are alien to a state ruled by law. Violence and vengeance are incompatible with the law in any case. At the same time, we cannot tolerate that the problems are swept under the rug as a way of dealing with a horrible past, because the results will later be disastrous for society. We Germans know from our own experience where this leads. Jewish philosophy formulates it in this way: “The secret of redemption is called remembering.”
Defense attorneys for communist officials have maintained that the difficulty lies in the fact that hundreds of thousands of political opponents were tried under laws of the DDR. Although these laws were designed to smother political dissent and grossly violated basic human rights and democratic norms, they were nonetheless laws promulgated by a sovereign state. How could one justly try individual Stasi officers, prosecutors, and judges who had simply been fulfilling their legal responsibility to pursue and punish violators of the law?
Opinions varied widely on whether and how the Stasi and other perpetrators of state-sponsored crimes should be tried. Did the laws of the DDR, as they existed before reunification, still apply in the east? Or was the criminal code of the western part of the country the proper instrument of justice in reunified Germany? However, these questions were moot: As Rupert Scholz, professor of law at the University of Munich and a Christian Democratic member of parliament, pointed out, the Unification Treaty specifies that the penal code of the DDR and not that of the Federal Republic of Germany (FRG) shall be applied to offenses committed in East Germany. Scholz’s view was upheld by the Bundesverfassungsgericht, the supreme court. Most offenses committed by party functionaries and Stasi officers—murder, kidnapping, torture, illegal wiretapping, mail robbery, and fraud—were subject to prosecution in reunified Germany under the DDR’s penal code. But this would not satisfy the tens of thousands of citizens who had been sent to prison under East German laws covering purely political offenses for which there was no West German equivalent.
Nevertheless, said Scholz, judicial authorities were by no means hamstrung, because West Germany had never recognized the East German state according to international law. “We have always said that we are one nation; that the division of Germany led neither to full recognition under international law nor, concomitantly, to a recognition of the legal system of the DDR,” Scholz said. Accordingly, West German courts have consistently maintained that West German law protects all Germans equally, including those living in the East. Therefore, no matter where the crimes were committed, whether in the East or the West, all Germans have always been subject to West German laws. Applying this logic, East German border guards who had either killed or wounded persons trying to escape to the West could be tried under the jurisdiction of West Germany.
The “one nation” principle was not upheld by the German supreme court. Prior to the court’s decision, however, Colonel General Markus Wolf, chief of the Stasi’s foreign espionage directorate, and some of his officers who personally controlled agents from East Berlin had been tried for treason and convicted. Wolf had been sentenced to six years in prison. The su-preme court ruling overturned that verdict and those imposed on Wolf’s cohorts, even though they had obtained the most closely held West German secrets and handed them over to the KGB. The maximum penalty for Landesverrat, or treason, is life imprisonment. In vacating Wolf’s sentence, the court said he could not be convicted because he operated only from East German territory and under East German law.
However, Wolf was reindicted on charges of kidnapping and causing bodily harm, crimes also punishable under East German law. The former Stasi three-star general, on March 24, 1955, had approved in writing a plan to kidnap a woman who worked for the U.S. mission in West Berlin. The woman and her mother were tricked by a Stasi agent whom the woman had been teaching English, and voluntarily got into his car. He drove them into the Soviet sector of the divided city, where they were seized by Stasi officers. The woman was subjected to psychological torture and threatened with imprisonment unless she signed an agreement to spy for the Stasi. She agreed. On her return to the American sector, however, the woman reported the incident to security officials. Wolf had committed a felony punishable by up to fifteen years’ imprisonment in West Germany. He was found guilty in March 1977 and sentenced to two years’ probation.
Those who have challenged the application of the statute of limitations to communist crimes, especially to the executions of citizens fleeing to the West, have drawn parallels to the notorious executive orders of Adolf Hitler. Hitler issued orders mandating the summary execution of Soviet Army political commissars upon their capture and initiating the extermination of Jews. An early postwar judicial decision held that these orders were equivalent to law. When that law was declared illegal and retroactively repealed by the West German Bundestag, the statute of limitations was suspended—that is, it never took effect. Many of those convicted in subsequent trials of carrying out the Führer’s orders were executed by the Allies. The German supreme court has ruled the same way as the Bundestag on the order to shoot people trying to escape to West Germany, making the statute of limitations inapplicable to such cases. The ruling made possible the trial of members of the National Defense Council who took part in formulating or promulgating the order. A number of border guards who had shot would-be escapees also have been tried and convicted.
Chief Prosecutor Heiner Sauer, former head of the West German Central Registration Office for Political Crimes, was particularly concerned with the border shootings. His office, located in Salzgitter, West Germany, was established in 1961 as a direct consequence of the Berlin Wall, which was erected on August 13 of that year. Willy Brandt, at the time the city’s mayor (later federal chancellor) had decided that crimes committed by East German border guards should be recorded. At his behest, a central registry of all shootings and other serious border incidents was instituted. Between August 13, 1961 and the opening of the borders on November 9, 1989, 186 border killings were registered. But when the Stasi archives were opened, investigators found that at least 825 people had paid with their lives for trying to escape to the West. This figure was reported to the court that was trying former members of the National Defense Council. In addition to these border incidents, the registry also had recorded a number of similar political offenses committed in the interior of the DDR: By fall 1991, Sauer’s office had registered 4,444 cases of actual or attempted killings and about 40,000 sentences handed down by DDR courts for “political offenses.”
During the early years of Sauer’s operation, the details of political prosecutions became known only when victims were ransomed by West Germany or were expelled. Between 1963 and 1989, West Germany paid DM5 billion (nearly US$3 billion) to the communist regime for the release of 34,000 political prisoners. The price per head varied according to the importance of the person or the length of the sentence. In some cases the ransom amounted to more than US$56,000. The highest sum ever paid to the East Germans appears to have been DM450,000 (US$264,705 using an exchange rate of US$1.70 to the mark). The ransom “object” in this case was Count Benedikt von Hoensbroech. A student in his early twenties, von Hoensbroech was attending a West Berlin university when the wall went up. He was caught by the Stasi while trying to help people escape and was sentenced to ten years at hard labor. The case at-tracted international attention because his family was related to Queen Fabiola of Belgium, who interceded with the East Germans. Smelling money, the East German government first demanded the equivalent of more than US$1 million from the young man’s father as ransom. In the end, the parties settled on the figure of DM450,000, of which the West German gov-ernment paid DM40,000 (about $23,529). Such ransom operations were fully controlled by the Stasi.
Political prisoners released in the DDR could not be registered by the West Germans because their cases remained secret. The victims were admonished to keep quiet or face another prison term. Nonetheless, in the first year after reunification, Sauer’s office added another 20,000 documented cases, for a total of 60,000. Sauer said he believed the final figure of all political prosecutions would be somewhere around 300,000. In every case, the Stasi was involved either in the initial arrest or in pretrial interrogations during which “confessions” were usually extracted by physical or psychological torture, particularly between the mid-1940s and the mid-1960s.
Until 1987, the DDR imposed the death penalty for a number of capital crimes, including murder, espionage, and economic offenses. But after the mid-1950s, nearly all death sentences were kept quiet and executions were carried out in the strictest secrecy, initially by guillotine and in later years by a single pistol shot to the neck. In most instances, the relatives of those killed were not informed either of the sentence or of the execution. The corpses were cremated and the ashes buried secretly, sometimes at construction sites. In reporting about one executioner who shot more than twenty persons to death, the Berlin newspaper Bildzeitung said that a total of 170 civilians had been executed in East Germany. However, Franco Werkenthin, the Berlin official investigating DDR crimes, said he had documented at least three hundred executions. He declined to say how many were for political offenses, because he had not yet submitted his report to parliament. “But it was substantial,” he told me. The true number of executions may never be known because no complete record of death sentences meted out by civil courts could be found. Other death sentences were handed down by military courts, and many records of those are also missing. In addition, German historian Günther Buch believes that about two hundred members of the Stasi itself were executed for various crimes, including attempts to escape to the West.
SAFEGUARDING HUMAN DIGNITY?
The preamble to the East German criminal code stated that the purpose of the code was to “safeguard the dignity of humankind, its freedom and rights under the aegis of the criminal code of the socialist state,” and that “a person can be prosecuted under the criminal code only in strictest concurrence with the law.” However, many of the codified offenses for which East German citizens were prosecuted and imprisoned were unique to totalitarian regimes, both fascist and communist.
Moreover, certain sections of the code, such as those on “Treasonable Relaying of Information” and “Treasonable Agent Activity,” were perversely applied, landing countless East Germans in maximum security penitentiaries. The victims of this perversion of justice usually were persons who had requested legal exit permits from the DDR authorities and had been turned down. In many cases, their “crime” was having contacted a Western consulate to inquire about immigration procedures. Sentences of up to two and a half years’ hard labor were not unusual as punishment for such inquiries.
Engaging in “propaganda hostile to the state” was another punishable offense. In one such case, a young man was arrested and prosecuted for saying that it was not necessary to station tanks at the border and for referring to border fortifications as “nonsense.” During his trial, he “admitted” to owning a television set on which he watched West German programs and later told friends what he saw. One of those “friends” had denounced him to the Stasi. The judge considered the accused’s actions especially egregious and sentenced him to a year and a half at hard labor.
Ironically, another part of this section of the criminal code decreed that “glorifying militarism” also was a punishable offense, although the DDR itself “glorified” its People’s Army beyond any Western norm. That army was clad in uniforms and insignia identical to those of the Nazi Wehrmacht, albeit without eagles and swastikas. The helmets, too, were differently shaped, but the Prussian goose step was regulation during parades.
A nineteen-year-old who had placed a sign in an apartment window reading “When justice is turned into injustice, resistance becomes an obligation!” was rewarded with twenty-two months in the penitentiary. Earlier, the youth had applied for an exit visa and had been turned down. A thirty-four-year-old father of two who also had been denied permission to leave the “workers’ and peasants’ state” with his family similarly advertised that fact with a poster reading “We want to leave, but they won’t let us.” The man went to prison for sixteen months. The “crimes” of both men were covered by a law on “Interference in Activities of the State or Society.”
Two letters—one to a friend in West Germany, seeking assistance to legally emigrate to the West, and another containing a similar appeal to Chief of State Honecker—brought a four-year sentence to their writer, who was convicted under two laws: those on “establishing illegal contacts” (writing to his friend) and on “public denigration” (writing to Honecker). The Stasi had illegally intercepted both letters.
The East German party chiefs were not content to rely only on the Stasi’s millions of informers to ferret out antistate sentiments. Leaving nothing to chance, they created a law that made the failure to denounce fellow citizens a crime punishable by up to five years’ imprisonment. One man was sentenced to twenty-three months for failing to report that a friend of his was preparing to escape to the West. The mandatory denunciation law had its roots in the statutes of the Socialist Unity Party, which were published in the form of a little red booklet. I picked up a copy of this booklet that had been discarded by its previous owner, a Stasi chauffeur, who had written “Ha, Ha” next to the mandate to “report any misdeeds, regardless of the person responsible, to leading party organs, all the way up to the Central Committee.”
Rupert Scholz, member of parliament and professor of law at the University of Munich, said many East Germans feel there is little determination among their Western brethren to bring the Stasi criminals to trial. “In fact, we already have heard many of them say that the peaceful revolution should have been a bloody one instead so they could have done away with their tormentors by hanging them posthaste,” Scholz told me.
The Reverend Joachim Gauck, minister to a Lutheran parish in East Germany, shared the people’s pessimism that justice would be done. Following reunification, Gauck was appointed by the Bonn government as its special representative for safeguarding and maintaining the Stasi archives. “We must at least establish a legal basis for finding the culprits in our files,” Gauck told me. “But it will not be easy. If you stood the millions of files upright in one line, they would stretch for 202 kilometers [about 121 miles]. In those files you can find an unbe-lievable number of Stasi victims and their tormentors.”
Gauck was given the mandate he needed in November 1991, when the German parliament passed a law authorizing file searches to uncover Stasi perpetrators and their informants. He viewed this legislation as first step in the right direction. With the evidence from Stasi files, the perpetrators could be removed from their public service jobs without any formal legal pro-ceedings. Said Gauck: “We needed this law badly. It is not reasonable that persons who served this apparatus of oppression remain in positions of trust. We need to win our people over to accepting that they are now free and governed by the rule of law. To achieve that, we must build up their confidence and trust in the public service.”
Searching the roughly six million files will take years. A significant number of the dossiers are located in repositories of the Stasi regional offices, sprinkled throughout eastern Germany. To put the files at the Berlin central repository in archival order would take one person 128 years. The job might have been made easier had the last DDR government not ordered the burning of thousands of Stasi computer tapes, ostensibly to forestall a witch-hunt. Thousands of files dealing with espionage were shredded and packed into 17,200 paper sacks. These were discovered when the Stasi headquarters was stormed on January 15, 1990. The contents of all of these bags now have been inspected. It took two workers between six and eight weeks to go through one bag. Then began the work of the puzzlers, putting the shredded pieces together. By the middle of 1997, fewer than 500 bags of shredded papers had been reconstructed—into about 200,000 pages. Further complicating matters was the lack of trained archivists and experts capable of organizing these files—to say nothing of the 37.5 million index cards bearing the names of informers as well as persons under Stasi surveillance—and interpreting their contents. Initially, funding for a staff of about 550 individuals was planned, at a total of about DM24.5 million annually (about US$15 million using an exchange rate of US$1.60). By 1997, the budget had grown to US$137 million and the staff to 3,100.
Stasi victims and citizens who had been under surveillance were allowed to examine their Stasi files. Within four years of reunification, about 860,000 persons had asked to inspect their case files, with 17,626 of those requests being received in December 1994 alone. By 1997, 3.4 million people had asked to see their files. Countless civil suits were launched when victims found the names of those who had denounced and betrayed them, and many family relationships and friendships were destroyed.
The rehabilitation of Stasi victims and financial restitution to them was well under way; but Gauck believed that criminal prosecution of the perpetrators would continue to be extremely difficult. “We can already see that leading SED functionaries who bear responsibility for the inhumane policies, for which they should be tried, are instead accused of lesser offenses such as corruption. It is actually an insult to democracy that a man like Harry Tisch is tried for embezzlement and not for being a member of the Politburo, where the criminal policies originated.”
The “Stasi files law,” as it is popularly known, also made it possible to vet parliamentarians for Stasi connections. Hundreds were fired or resigned—and a few committed suicide—when it was discovered that they had been Stasi informants. Among those who resigned was Lothar de Maiziere, the last premier of the DDR, who signed the unification agreement with West German Chancellor Helmut Kohl. He was a member of the East German version of the Christian Democratic Union, which like all noncommunist parties in the Eastern bloc had been totally co-opted by the regime. After reunification, he moved into parliament and was awarded the vice chairmanship of Kohl’s Christian Democratic Union. A lawyer, De Maiziere had functioned for years as an IM, an informer, under the cover name Cerny. De Maiziere at first denied he was Cerny, but the evidence was overwhelming. It was De Maiziere’s government that had ordered the destruction of the Stasi computer tapes.
THE COMMUNISTS’ POLITICAL SURVIVAL
De Maiziere, who had been a driving force behind prompt reunification, soon passed into oblivion; but twenty members of the old Communist Party, the SED, are still members of parliament. The SED changed its name in late 1989, when the DDR was collapsing, to the Party of Democratic Socialism (PDS). Its new leadership arrogantly dismissed their bloody past as irrelevant now that the word democratic had been adopted as part of their party’s name. If the elections of summer 1990 had taken place just a few months later and thus had been conducted under the law of reunified Germany, these individuals would not have won parliamentary seats. The West German electoral rules governing the proportional representation system require that a party garner at least 5 percent of the vote before it may enter parliament. In addition to choosing a party, voters cast a second ballot for a specific person. This is called a direct mandate. If any party falls below 5 percent but gets at least three direct mandates, that party is seated in parliament. As a one-time compromise in consideration of East Germany’s smaller population, the Bonn government accepted a 3-percent margin of party votes. Even so, the PDS barely made it into parliament.
In the 1994 general election, the first after reunification, the party polled 4.4 percent. Had it not been for the votes electing four persons by direct mandate, the PDS would have been excluded. The direct mandates all came from East Berlin districts heavily populated by unemployed, former Communist Party and government officials. One of the men elected directly was Gregor Gysi, a communist lawyer who had been accused of informing on his clients to the Stasi. Gysi denied the allegations and had obtained a temporary injunction barring a former East German dissident from making the assertion. However, a Hamburg court lifted the injunction in December 1994 on the basis of Stasi documents that indicated Gysi had no case.
Another candidate directly elected to parliament was Stefan Heym, a German-born writer who had emigrated to the United States after Hitler came to power, had changed his name from Helmut Flieg, and had become a U.S. citizen. He served in the U.S. Army as an officer during World War II, but switched sides in 1952 to live in East Germany, forfeiting his U.S. citizenship in order to become an East German citizen and a member of the Communist Party. A year later, on June 17, 1953, the East German people rose up in a revolt that was crushed by the Red Army. Had it not been for the intervention of the Soviets, Heym wrote afterward in the communist daily newspaper Berliner Zeitung, “the American bombing would have already begun. The shots against the rebels were fired to prevent war, rather than to begin one.” And when Stalin died, just four months earlier, Heym used the same newspaper to mourn the butcher of an estimated twenty million people as the “most loved man of our times.” Finally, in a speech on January 31, 1995, at a demonstration marking the 62nd anniversary of the Nazi takeover, the unrepentant Heym, now eighty-two years old, had the gall to say that the present climate in Germany was “very similar to that in 1933, and this frightens me.” It was a grotesque spectacle when Heym was accorded the “honor” of delivering the opening address of the 1965 parliamentary session traditionally reserved for the body’s oldest member. Despite vehement protests, parliamentary president Rita Süssmuth ruled to uphold the tradition.
One of the PDS members also retaining his seat was Hans Modrow. Modrow, a veteran communist, was SED district secretary in Dresden. It was a most powerful communal political position. Modrow was a vital cog in the apparatus of state repression. The local Stasi chief, Major General Horst Böhm, reported directly to him. Modrow was the one who ordered the Vopo, the People’s Police, to resort to violence in putting down massive protests during the turbulent days in fall 1989, just before the Berlin Wall fell. Hundreds of protesters were severely beaten and jailed. Böhm, the Dresden Stasi boss, was found shot dead in his office in early 1990, just before he was to appear before a commission that had been convened to settle the future of the communist state. His death was listed as a suicide. However, an unsubstantiated rumor has it that he was murdered to prevent him from testifying about Modrow’s despotic rule. Modrow was found guilty of election fraud in May 1993. The DDR hierarchy, according to the evidence, had ordered that the number of votes opposing the official slate in the 1989 election had to be fewer than in 1985. Modrow reported that only 2.5 percent of the ballots in his district were cast in opposition; but the true number was at least four times higher. The judge issued him a mere rebuke, refusing to imprison or fine him. The federal high court, which reviews sentences, ordered in November 1994 that Modrow stand trial again because the sentence “was too mild.” After a new trial in 1996 on charges of perjury, Modrow was sentenced to six months’ probation. A year later, parliament was still considering whether he should be deprived of his seat.
Unlike the Nazi Party’s finances and property, which were confiscated by the victorious Allies and turned over to the first West German government in 1949, the SED’s millions were inherited by the PDS, which spirited part of those funds out of the country when the East German government collapsed. The PDS also became custodian of the archives of the SED and refused anyone outside the party access to them. Shortly after reunification, in 1990, the courts ruled that the archives were state property. Judicial authorities as well as scholars were permitted to research them. Nevertheless, the SED archives were almost lost. In 1994, the German news magazine Focus discovered a letter dated March 1991, sent by Gregor Gysi in the capacity of PDS party chief to Vladimir A. Ivashko, assistant secretary-general of the Soviet Union’s Communist Party. In this letter, Gysi pleaded with Soviet leaders either to put pressure on German Chancellor Helmut Kohl to return the archive to the PDS, or if Kohl felt this was politically impossible, to destroy it. The opening of the archive, Gysi wrote, was a “genuine catastrophe,” because it contained many secret documents. Publication of the documents would have “extremely unpleasant results not only for the PDS but for the Communist Party of the Soviet Union as well,” Gysi wrote. But his Soviet friends were no longer able to help him. The archive holds documents on Politburo decisions and directives that might prove crucial in prosecuting the former East German party hierarchy. In the end, the PDS offered to settle for 20 percent of the SED’s ill-gotten funds, forfeiting the rest as a gesture of goodwill toward the new state.
Not all observers were impressed by this compromise. Peter Gauweiler, Bavaria’s minister for development and ecological affairs at the time of reunification, and a member of the Chris-tian Democratic Party, demanded that the PDS and the Deutsche Kommunistische Partei (DKP, the West German Communist Party), be outlawed: “Every month we learn of new crimes committed by the SED—terrible things, gruesome things,” Gauweiler said. “We cannot tolerate a successor organization to such an extremely criminal gang.”
Become a Patron!
True Information is the most valuable resource and we ask you to give back.
Klaus-Dieter Maurischat – Ein Alien auf der Flucht wg. Mordes, Erpressung, Betrug, Cyberstalking, Geldwäsche, Kursmanipulation, Verleumdung, Kinderpornographie, hab ich was vergessen ?
Become a Patron!
True Information is the most valuable resource and we ask you to give back.
Ukraine’s former president Viktor Yushchenko says he hopes Europe will wake up to the threat posed by Russia in the wake of the poisonings in Salisbury. Seventeen years ago Mr Yushchenko was taking on a presidential candidate favoured by Russia when he was poisoned with a dioxin, a toxic chemical.
Become a Patron!
True Information is the most valuable resource and we ask you to give back.
Evidence shows that such a perfect murder plotted by former Stasi agents is the cause of the death of German watchdog and journalist Heinz Gerlach.
The Ministry for State Security (German: Ministerium für Staatssicherheit (MfS), commonly known as the Stasi (IPA: [ˈʃtaziː]) (abbreviation German: Staatssicherheit, literally State Security), was the official state security service of East Germany. The MfS was headquartered in East Berlin, with an extensive complex in Berlin-Lichtenberg and several smaller facilities throughout the city. It was widely regarded as one of the most effective and repressive intelligence and secret police agencies in the world. The MfS motto was “Schild und Schwert der Partei” (Shield and Sword of the Party), that is the ruling Socialist Unity Party of Germany (SED).
According to the confessions of an informer, Berlin lawyer Jochen Resch writes most of the “articles” of the communist “STASI” agency “GoMoPa” himself or it is done by lawyers of his firm. The whistleblower states that lawyer Resch is the mastermind behind the “CYBER-STASI” called “NACHRICHTENDIENST” “GoMoPa”. Bizarre enough they use Jewish names of non-existing Jewish lawyers by the name of “Goldman, Morgenstern and Partner” to stage their bogus “firm”. Further involved in their complots are a “detective” Medard Fuchsgruber and “STASI”-Colonel Ehrenfried Stelzer, “the first crime expert” in the former communist East-Germany.
According to London based Meridian Capital hundreds and thousands of wealthy people and companies have paid to the “NACHRICHTENDIENST” to avoid their cyberstalking (see article below).
Finally the German criminal police started their investigations (case number ST/0148943/2011).
The “NACHRICHTENDIENST” is also involved in the death of the well-known German watchdog and journalist Heinz Gerlach who died under strange circumstances in July 2010.
Only hours after his death the “NACHRICHTENDIENST” was spreading the news that Mr Gerlach died of blood pollution and set the stage for a fairy tale. Months before his death the “NACHRICHTENDIENST” started a campaign to ruin his reputation and presumably was also responsable for cyberattacks to bring his website down. In fact they presumably used the same tactics also against our servers. Therefore we investigated all internet details of them and handed the facts to the FBI and international authorities.
Story background:
Now it seems the STASI is back again in business after transforming it in to the CYBER-STASI of the 21st Century.
The serial betrayer and cyberstalker Klaus Maurischat is on the run again. The latest action against him (see below) cause him to react in a series of fake statements and “press releases” – one more absurd than the other. Insider analyze that his criminal organisation “GoMoPa” is about to fade away.
On our request the German criminal police (Kriminalpolizei) has opened new cases against the notorious “GoMoPa” organisation which already fled in the underground. Insiders say they have killed German journalist and watchdog Heinz Gerlach and their criminal record is bigger than the Encyclopedia – Britannica
The case is also directed against Google, Germany, whilst supporting criminal action of “GoMoPa” for years and therefore give them the chance to blackmail successfull businessman. This case is therefore an example and will be followed by many others as far as we can project. Furthermore we will bring the case to the attention of the German lawyers community which will not tolerate such misconduct by Googles German legal representative Dr. Arndt Haller and we will bring the case to the attention of Google Inc in Mountain View, USA, and the American ministry of Justice to stop the Cyberstalkers once and for all.
Besides that many legal institutions, individuals and firms have already contacted us to help to clarify the death of Mr. Heinz Gerlach and to prosecute his murderers and their backers.
The case number is ST/0148943/2011
In a series of interviews beginning 11 months before the sudden death of German watchdog Heinz Gerlach Berlin lawyer Joschen Resch unveilved secrets of Gerlach, insiders say. Secret documents from Mr Gerlachs computer were published on two dubious hostile German websites. Both have a lot of similarities in their internet registration. One the notorious “GoMoPa” website belongs to a n Eastern German organization which calls itself “
Numerous attempts have been made to stop our research and the publication of the stories by “GoMoPa” members in camouflage thus confirming the truth and the substance of it in a superior way.
Only two articles let the German audience believe that the famous journalist and watchdog Heinz Gerlach died on natural courses by blood pollution. The first one, published only hours after the death of Mr Heinz Gerlach by the notorious “GoMoPa” (see article below) and a second 3 days later by a small German local newspaper, Weserbergland Nachrichten.
Many people including the hostile Gerlach website “Akte Heinz Gerlach” doubted that this man who had so many enemies and friends would die of natural causes without any previous warning. Rumours occured that Mr. Gerlach’s doctor doubted natural courses at all. After many critical voices discussed the issue a small website of a small German local newspaper – which never before had reported about Mr. Heinz Gerlach and which is not even in the region of Mr Gerlachs home – published that Mr Gerlach died of blood pollution. Weserbergland-Nachrichten published a long article about the deadly consequences of blood pollution and did not even name the source of such an important statement. It claimed only that somebody of Gerlachs inner circle had said this. It is a proven fact that after the collpase of the Eastern German Communist Regime many former Communist propaganda agents went to regional newspapers – often in Western Germany like Günther Schabowski did the man who opened the “Mauer”.
The theatre stage was set: One day later the hostile Gerlach website “Akte Heinz Gerlach” took the agenda publishing that Mr Gerlach had died for natural causes without any further research at all.
This was done by a website which for months and months and months reported everything about Mr. Gerlach.
Furthermore a research proves that the technical details regarding the website hosting of this hostile website “Akte Heinz Gerlach” proves that there are common details with the hosting of “GoMoPa” and their affiliates as proven by the SJB-GoMoPa-victims (see http://www.sjb-fonds-opfer.com)
Insiders believe that the murderers of Mr. Heinz Gerlach are former members of the Eastern German Terror Organisation “Stasi” with dioxins. They also believe that “GoMoPa” was part of the plot. At “GoMoPa”’ a person named Siegfried Siewers was officialy responsible for the press but never appeared in public. “GoMoPa”-victims say that this name was a cameo for “GoMoPa” frontrunner Klaus Maurischat who is controlled by the Stasi Top Agent Ehrenfried Stelzner, Berlin.
Siegfried Sievers, a former Stasi member is responsible for the pollution of millions Germanys for many years with dioxins. This was unveiled at 5th of January 2011 by German prosecutors.
The victims say that Maurischat (probably also a Stasi cameo) and Sievers were in contact as Sievers acted as Stasi Agent and was in fact already a specialist in dioxins under the Communist Terror Regime in Eastern Germany.
Furthermore the Stasi Top Agent Ehrenfried Stelzer disguised as Professor for Criminal studies during the Communist Regime at the Eastern Berlin Humboldt University.
Background:
The man behind the Berlin lawyer Jochen Resch and his activities is Ehrenfried Stelzer, former Stasi Top officer in Berlin and “Professor for Criminal Studies” at the Eastern Berlin Humboldt University during the Communist regime, the SJB-GoMoPa-victims say (www.sjb-fonds-opfer.com) is responsable for the killing of German watchdog and journalist Heinz Gerlach.
These informations stem from various sources who were close to the criminal organization of GoMoPa in the last years. The SJB-GoMoPa say that the well-known German watchdog and journalist Heinz Gerlach was killed by former Stasi members with dioxins. Polychlorinated dibenzodioxins (PCDDs), or simply dioxins, are a group of organic polyhalogenated compounds that are significant because they act as environmental pollutants. They are commonly referred to as dioxins for simplicity in scientific publications because every PCDD molecule contains a dioxin skeletal structure. Typically, the p-dioxin skeleton is at the core of a PCDD molecule, giving the molecule a dibenzo-p-dioxin ring system. Members of the PCDD family have been shown to bioaccumulate in humans and wildlife due to their lipophilic properties, and are known teratogens, mutagens, and confirmed (avered) human carcinogens. They are organic compounds.
Dioxins build up primarily in fatty tissues over time (bioaccumulate), so even small exposures may eventually reach dangerous levels. In 1994, the US EPA reported that dioxins are a probable carcinogen, but noted that non-cancer effects (reproduction and sexual development, immune system) may pose an even greater threat to human health. TCDD, the most toxic of the dibenzodioxins, is classified as a Group 1 carcinogen by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC).
In 2004, a notable individual case of dioxin poisoning, Ukrainian politician Viktor Yushchenko was exposed to the second-largest measured dose of dioxins, according to the reports of the physicians responsible for diagnosing him. This is the first known case of a single high dose of TCDD dioxin poisoning, and was diagnosed only after a toxicologist recognized the symptoms of chloracne while viewing television news coverage of his condition.
German dioxin scandal: In January 2011 about 4700 German farms were banned from making deliveries after tests at the Harles und Jentzsch plant in the state of Schleswig-Holstein showed high levels of dioxin. Again this incident appears to involve PCBs and not PCDDs at all. Dioxin were found in animal feed and eggs in many farms. The person who is responsible for this, Siegfried Sievert is also a former Stasi Agent. At “GoMoPa” the notorious Eastern-Berlin press agency (see article below) one of the henchmen acted under the name of “Siegfried Siewert”.
Further evidence for the killing of Mr.Heinz Gerlach is provided by the SJB-GoMoPa-victims by analyzing the dubious role of former Stasi-Top-agent Ehrenfried Stelzer, also a former “Professor for Crime Studies” under the Communist regime in Eastern Germany and the dubious role of “detective” Medard Fuchsgruber. Both are closely tied to the dubious “GoMoPa” and Berlin lawyer Jochen Resch.
According to the SJB-GoMoPa-victims is Berlin lawyer Jochen Resch the mastermind of the criminal organization “GoMoPa2. The victims state that they have a source inside “GoMoPa” who helped them discover the shocking truth. The so-called “Deep Throat from Berlin” has information that Resch had the idea to found the criminal organization “GoMoPa” and use non-existing Jewish lawyers named Goldman, Morgenstern & Partner as camouflage. Their “office” in Madison Avenue, New York, is a mailbox. This is witnessed by a German Ex-Patriot, a lawyer, whose father, Heinz Gerlach, died under strange circumstances.
Resch seems to use “GoMoPa” as an instrument to blackmail parts of the German Property and Investment section.
-“Worse than the Gestapo.” —Simon Wiesenthal, Nazi hunter said about the notorious “Stasi”.
Less than a month after German demonstrators began to tear down the Berlin Wall on November 9, 1989, irate East German citizens stormed the Leipzig district office of the Ministry for State Security (MfS)—the Stasi, as it was more commonly called. Not a shot was fired, and there was no evidence of “street justice” as Stasi officers surrendered meekly and were peacefully led away. The following month, on January 15, hundreds of citizens sacked Stasi headquarters in Berlin. Again there was no bloodshed. The last bit of unfinished business was accomplished on May 31 when the Stasi radioed its agents in West Germany to fold their tents and come home.
The intelligence department of the Nationale Volksarmee (NVA), the People’s Army, had done the same almost a week earlier, but with what its members thought was better style. In-stead of sending the five-digit code groups that it had used for decades to message its spies in West Germany, the army group broadcast a male choir singing a children’s ditty about a duck swimming on a lake. There was no doubt that the singing spymasters had been drowning their sorrow over losing the Cold War in schnapps. The giggling, word-slurring songsters repeated the refrain three times: “Dunk your little head in the water and lift your little tail.” This was the signal to agents under deep cover that it was time to come home.
With extraordinary speed and political resolve, the divided nation was reunified a year later. The collapse of the despotic regime was total. It was a euphoric time for Germans, but reunification also produced a new national dilemma. Nazi war crimes were still being tried in West Germany, forty-six years after World War II. Suddenly the German government was faced with demands that the communist officials who had ordered, executed, and abetted crimes against their own people—crimes that were as brutal as those perpetrated by their Nazi predecessors—also be prosecuted.
The people of the former Deutsche Demokratische Republik (DDR), the German Democratic Republic, as the state had called itself for forty years, were clamoring for instant revenge. Their wrath was directed primarily against the country’s communist rulers—the upper echelon of the Sozialistische Einheitspartei (SED), the Socialist Unity Party. The tens of thousands of second-echelon party functionaries who had enriched themselves at the expense of their cocitizens were also prime targets for retribution.
Particularly singled out were the former members of the Stasi, the East German secret police, who previously had considered themselves the “shield and sword” of the party. When the regime collapsed, the Stasi had 102,000 full-time officers and noncommissioned personnel on its rolls, including 11,000 members of the ministry’s own special guards regiment. Between 1950 and 1989, a total of 274,000 persons served in the Stasi.
The people’s ire was running equally strong against the regular Stasi informers, the inoffizielle Mitarbeiter (IMs). By 1995, 174,000 had been identified as IMs, or 2.5 percent of the total population between the ages of 18 and 60. Researchers were aghast when they found that about 10,000 IMs, or roughly 6 percent of the total, had not yet reached the age of 18. Since many records were destroyed, the exact number of IMs probably will never be determined; but 500,000 was cited as a realistic figure. Former Colonel Rainer Wiegand, who served in the Stasi counterintelligence directorate, estimated that the figure could go as high as 2 million, if occasional stool pigeons were included.
“The Stasi was much, much worse than the Gestapo, if you consider only the oppression of its own people,” according to Simon Wiesenthal of Vienna, Austria, who has been hunting Nazi criminals for half a century. “The Gestapo had 40,000 officials watching a country of 80 million, while the Stasi employed 102,000 to control only 17 million.” One might add that the Nazi terror lasted only twelve years, whereas the Stasi had four decades in which to perfect its machinery of oppression, espionage, and international terrorism and subversion.
To ensure that the people would become and remain submissive, East German communist leaders saturated their realm with more spies than had any other totalitarian government in recent history. The Soviet Union’s KGB employed about 480,000 full-time agents to oversee a nation of 280 million, which means there was one agent per 5,830 citizens. Using Wiesenthal’s figures for the Nazi Gestapo, there was one officer for 2,000 people. The ratio for the Stasi was one secret policeman per 166 East Germans. When the regular informers are added, these ratios become much higher: In the Stasi’s case, there would have been at least one spy watching every 66 citizens! When one adds in the estimated numbers of part-time snoops, the result is nothing short of monstrous: one informer per 6.5 citizens. It would not have been unreasonable to assume that at least one Stasi informer was present in any party of ten or twelve dinner guests.
THE STASI OCTOPUS
Like a giant octopus, the Stasi’s tentacles probed every aspect of life. Full-time officers were posted to all major industrial plants. Without exception, one tenant in every apartment build-ing was designated as a watchdog reporting to an area representative of the Volkspolizei (Vopo), the People’s Police. In turn, the police officer was the Stasi’s man. If a relative or friend came to stay overnight, it was reported. Schools, universities, and hospitals were infiltrated from top to bottom. German academe was shocked to learn that Heinrich Fink, professor of theology and vice chancellor at East Berlin’s Humboldt University, had been a Stasi informer since 1968. After Fink’s Stasi connections came to light, he was summarily fired. Doctors, lawyers, journalists, writers, actors, and sports figures were co-opted by Stasi officers, as were waiters and hotel personnel. Tapping about 100,000 telephone lines in West Germany and West Berlin around the clock was the job of 2,000 officers.
Stasi officers knew no limits and had no shame when it came to “protecting the party and the state.” Churchmen, including high officials of both Protestant and Catholic denomina-tions, were recruited en masse as secret informers. Their offices and confessionals were infested with eavesdropping devices. Even the director of Leipzig’s famous Thomas Church choir, Hans-Joachim Rotch, was forced to resign when he was unmasked as a Spitzel, the people’s pejorative for a Stasi informant.
Absolutely nothing was sacred to the secret police. Tiny holes were bored in apartment and hotel room walls through which Stasi agents filmed their “suspects” with special video cam-eras. Even bathrooms were penetrated by the communist voyeurs.8 Like the Nazi Gestapo, the Stasi was the sinister side of deutsche Gründlichkeit (German thoroughness).
After the Berlin wall came down, the victims of the DDR regime demanded immediate retribution. Ironically, their demands were countered by their fellow Germans in the West who, living in freedom, had diligently built einen demokratischen Rechtsstaat, a democratic state governed by the rule of law. The challenge of protecting the rights of both the victims and the accused was immense, given the emotions surrounding the issue. Government leaders and democratic politicians recognized that there could be no “quick fix” of communist injustices without jeopardizing the entire system of democratic jurisprudence. Moving too rapidly merely to satisfy the popular thirst for revenge might well have resulted in acquittals or mistrials. Intricate jurisdictional questions needed to be resolved with both alacrity and meticulousness. No German government could afford to allow a perpetrator to go free because of a judicial error. The political fallout from any such occurrence, especially in the East, could prove fatal to whatever political party occupied the chancellor’s office in Bonn at the time.
Politicians and legal scholars of the “old federal states,” or West Germany, counseled patience, pointing out that even the prosecution of Nazi criminals had not yet been completed. Before unification, Germans would speak of Vergangenheitsbewältigung (“coming to grips with the past”) when they discussed dealing with Nazi crimes. In the reunited Germany, this word came to imply the communist past as well. The two were considered comparable especially in the area of human rights violations. Dealing with major Nazi crimes, however, was far less complicated for the Germans: Adolf Hitler and his Gestapo and Schutzstaffel (SS) chief, Heinrich Himmler, killed themselves, as did Luftwaffe chief and Vice Chancellor Hermann Göring, who also had been the first chief of the Gestapo. The victorious Allies prosecuted the rest of the top leadership at the International War Crimes Tribunal in Nürnberg. Twelve were hanged, three received life terms, four were sentenced to lesser terms of imprisonment (up to twenty years), and three were acquitted.
The cases of communist judges and prosecutors accused of Rechtsbeugung (perversion of justice) are more problematic. According to Franco Werkenthin, a Berlin legal expert charged with analyzing communist crimes for the German parliament, those sitting in judgment of many of the accused face a difficult task because of the general failure of German justice after World War II. Not a single judge or prosecutor who served the Nazi regime was brought to account for having perverted justice—even those who had handed down death sentences for infringements that in a democracy would have been considered relatively minor offenses. Werkenthin called this phenomenon die Jauche der Justiz, the cesspool of justice.
Of course, the crimes committed by the communists were not nearly as heinous as the Nazis’ extermination of the Jews, or the mass murders in Nazi-occupied territories. However, the communists’ brutal oppression of the nation by means including murder alongside legal execution put the SED leadership on a par with Hitler’s gang. In that sense, Walter Ulbricht or Erich Honecker (Ulbricht’s successor as the party’s secretary-general and head of state) and secret police chief Erich Mielke can justifiably be compared to Hitler and Himmler, respectively.
Arrest warrants were issued for Honecker and Mielke. The Soviet government engineered Honecker’s escape to Moscow, where he became the ward of Soviet President Mikhail S. Gor-bachev. When the Soviet Union crumbled, the new Russian President Boris Yeltsin expelled Honecker. He was arrested on his return to Germany, but a court decided against a trial when he was diagnosed with liver cancer. Honecker flew to Chile with his wife Margot to live with their daughter, a Chilean citizen by marriage. His exile was short, and he died in 1994. Mielke was not so fortunate: His KGB friends turned their backs on him. He was tried in Germany for the 1931 murder of two police officers, found guilty, and sentenced to six years in prison. Other charges, including manslaughter, were dismissed because of his advanced age and poor health.
Three other members of the twenty-one-member ruling Politburo also have been tried. Former Defense Minister Heinz Kessler was convicted of manslaughter in connection with the order to kill people who were trying to escape to the West. He received a seven-and-a-half-year term. Two others, members of the Central Committee and the National Defense Council, were tried with Kessler and sentenced to seven and a half years and five years, respectively. Politburo member Harry Tisch, who was also head of the communist trade union, was found guilty of embezzlement and served eighteen months. Six others, including Egon Krenz (Honecker’s successor as party chief), were charged with manslaughter. Krenz was found guilty, and on August 25, 1997, was sentenced to six and a half years in prison.
However, eight years after reunification, many of the 165 members of the Central Committee have not yet been put under investigation. In 1945, Nazis holding comparable or lesser positions were subject to automatic arrest by the Allies. They spent months or even years in camps while their cases were adjudicated. Moreover, the Nürnberg Tribunal branded the Reich and its Corps of Political Leaders, SS, Security Service (SD), Secret State Police (Gestapo), SA (Storm Troopers), and Armed Forces High Command criminal organizations. Similarly sweeping actions against communist leaders and functionaries such as Stasi officers were never contemplated, even though tens of thousands of political trials and human rights abuses have been documented. After the East German regime fell, German judicial authorities scrupulously avoided the appearance of waging witch-hunts or using the law as a weapon of vengeance. Prosecutors and judges made great efforts to be fair, often suspending legal action while requesting rulings from the supreme court on possible constitutional conflicts.
The victims of oppression clamored for revenge and demanded speedy prosecution of the erstwhile tyrants. They had little patience for a judicial system that was handicapped by a lack of unblemished and experienced criminal investigators, prosecutors, and judges. Despite these handicaps, the Berlin Central Police Investigations Group for Government Criminality, mindful that the statute of limitations for most communist crimes would expire at the end of 1999, made significant progress under its director Manfred Kittlaus, the able former director of the West Berlin state police. Kittlaus’s major task in 1998 was to investigate wrongful deaths, including 73 murders, 30 attempted murders, 583 cases of manslaughter, 2,938 instances of attempted manslaughter, and 425 other suspicious deaths. Of the 73 murders, 22 were classified as contract murders.
One of those tried and convicted for attempted contract murder was former Stasi collaborator Peter Haak, who was sentenced to six and a half years in prison. The fifty-two-year-old Haak took part in the Stasi’s 1981 Operation Scorpion, which was designed to pursue people who helped East Germans escape to the West. Proceedings against former General Gerhard Neiber, whose Stasi directorate was responsible for preventing escapes and for wreaking vengeance, were still pending in 1998.
Peter Haak’s murder plot was hatched after he befriended Wolfgang Welsch and his family. Welsch was a thorn in the side of the Stasi because of his success in smuggling people out of the DDR. Haak joined Welsch and the latter’s wife and seven-year-old daughter on a vacation in Israel, where he mixed a gram of thallium, a highly poisonous metallic chemical element used in rat poison, into the hamburgers he was preparing for a meal. Welsch’s wife and daughter vomited immediately after ingesting the poison and recovered quickly. Welsch suffered severe aftereffects, but eventually recovered: He had consumed a large amount of beer with the meal, and an expert testified that the alcohol had probably flushed the poison from his system.
Berlin Prosecutor General Christoph Schäfgen revealed that after the DDR’s demise 15,200 investigations had been launched, of which more than 9,000 were still active at the beginning of 1995. Indictments were handed down in 153 cases, and 73 perpetrators were convicted. Among those convicted were the aforementioned Politburo members as well as a number of border guards who had killed people who were trying to escape to the West.
Despite widespread misgivings about the judicial failures in connection with some Nazi crimes, a number of judges and prosecutors were convicted and jailed for up to three years for perversion of justice. In collusion with the Stasi, they had requested or handed down more severe sentences in political cases so that the state could collect greater amounts when the “convicts” were ransomed by the West German government. {The amount of ransom paid was governed by the time a prisoner had been sentenced to serve.)
The enormity of the task facing judicial authorities in reunified Germany becomes starkly evident when one examines the actions they have taken in all five former East German prov-inces and in East Berlin. From the end of 1990 to July 1996, 52,050 probes were launched into charges of murder, attempted murder, manslaughter, kidnapping, election fraud, and per-version of justice. A total of 29,557 investigations were halted for various reasons including death, severe illness, old age, or insufficient evidence. In those five and a half years, there were only 139 convictions.
The problem is even more staggering when cases of espionage are included. Between 1990 and 1996, the office of the federal prosecutor general launched 6,641 probes, of which 2,431 were terminated before trial—most due to the statute of limitations. Of 175 indictments on charges of espionage, 95 resulted in convictions. In addition to the cases handled at the federal level, the prosecutor general referred 3,926 investigations to state authorities, who terminated 3,344 without trial. State courts conducted 356 trials, resulting in 248 convictions. Because the statute of limitations for espionage is five years, the prosecutor general’s office told me in 1997 it was unlikely that more espionage trials would be conducted.
It is important to emphasize the difference between the statute’s application to so-called government crimes committed in East Germany before the collapse and to crimes, such as es-pionage, committed in West Germany. The Unification Treaty specifically permits the belated prosecution of individuals who committed acts that were punishable under the East German criminal code and who due to official connivance were not prosecuted earlier. There is no statute of limitations for murder. For most other crimes the limit is five years; however, due to the obstacles created by previous government connivance, the German parliament in 1993 doubled this time limit for prosecution of the more serious crimes. At the same time, the par-liament decreed that all cases must be adjudicated by the end of 2002. For less serious offenses, the statute would have run out on December 31, 1997, but the parliament extended it to 2000.
A number of politicians, jurists, and liberal journalists pleaded for a general amnesty for crimes committed by former DDR leaders and Communist Party functionaries. A former West German supreme court judge, Ernst Mahrenholz, said the “sharp sword of justice prevents reconciliation.” Schäfgen, the Berlin prosecutor general, had this answer for the former high court judge and other amnesty advocates:
I cannot agree. We are raising no special, sharp sword against East Germans. We must pursue state-sponsored injustice in exactly the same manner as we do when a thief steals or when one human being kills another. If one wants to change that, then we would have to do away with the entire criminal justice system, because punishment always hurts. We are not criminalizing an entire people but only an ever shrinking, small portion.
German Foreign Minister Klaus Kinkel, who was West Germany’s minister of justice when the nation was unified, said this at a session of parliament in September 1991: “We must punish the perpetrators. This is not a matter of a victor’s justice. We owe it to the ideal of justice and to the victims. All of those who ordered injustices and those who executed the orders must be punished; the top men of the SED as well as the ones who shot [people] at the wall.” Aware that the feelings against communists were running high among their victims, Kinkel pointed to past revolutions after which the representatives of the old system were collectively liquidated. In the same speech before parliament, he said:
Such methods are alien to a state ruled by law. Violence and vengeance are incompatible with the law in any case. At the same time, we cannot tolerate that the problems are swept under the rug as a way of dealing with a horrible past, because the results will later be disastrous for society. We Germans know from our own experience where this leads. Jewish philosophy formulates it in this way: “The secret of redemption is called remembering.”
Defense attorneys for communist officials have maintained that the difficulty lies in the fact that hundreds of thousands of political opponents were tried under laws of the DDR. Although these laws were designed to smother political dissent and grossly violated basic human rights and democratic norms, they were nonetheless laws promulgated by a sovereign state. How could one justly try individual Stasi officers, prosecutors, and judges who had simply been fulfilling their legal responsibility to pursue and punish violators of the law?
Opinions varied widely on whether and how the Stasi and other perpetrators of state-sponsored crimes should be tried. Did the laws of the DDR, as they existed before reunification, still apply in the east? Or was the criminal code of the western part of the country the proper instrument of justice in reunified Germany? However, these questions were moot: As Rupert Scholz, professor of law at the University of Munich and a Christian Democratic member of parliament, pointed out, the Unification Treaty specifies that the penal code of the DDR and not that of the Federal Republic of Germany (FRG) shall be applied to offenses committed in East Germany. Scholz’s view was upheld by the Bundesverfassungsgericht, the supreme court. Most offenses committed by party functionaries and Stasi officers—murder, kidnapping, torture, illegal wiretapping, mail robbery, and fraud—were subject to prosecution in reunified Germany under the DDR’s penal code. But this would not satisfy the tens of thousands of citizens who had been sent to prison under East German laws covering purely political offenses for which there was no West German equivalent.
Nevertheless, said Scholz, judicial authorities were by no means hamstrung, because West Germany had never recognized the East German state according to international law. “We have always said that we are one nation; that the division of Germany led neither to full recognition under international law nor, concomitantly, to a recognition of the legal system of the DDR,” Scholz said. Accordingly, West German courts have consistently maintained that West German law protects all Germans equally, including those living in the East. Therefore, no matter where the crimes were committed, whether in the East or the West, all Germans have always been subject to West German laws. Applying this logic, East German border guards who had either killed or wounded persons trying to escape to the West could be tried under the jurisdiction of West Germany.
The “one nation” principle was not upheld by the German supreme court. Prior to the court’s decision, however, Colonel General Markus Wolf, chief of the Stasi’s foreign espionage directorate, and some of his officers who personally controlled agents from East Berlin had been tried for treason and convicted. Wolf had been sentenced to six years in prison. The su-preme court ruling overturned that verdict and those imposed on Wolf’s cohorts, even though they had obtained the most closely held West German secrets and handed them over to the KGB. The maximum penalty for Landesverrat, or treason, is life imprisonment. In vacating Wolf’s sentence, the court said he could not be convicted because he operated only from East German territory and under East German law.
However, Wolf was reindicted on charges of kidnapping and causing bodily harm, crimes also punishable under East German law. The former Stasi three-star general, on March 24, 1955, had approved in writing a plan to kidnap a woman who worked for the U.S. mission in West Berlin. The woman and her mother were tricked by a Stasi agent whom the woman had been teaching English, and voluntarily got into his car. He drove them into the Soviet sector of the divided city, where they were seized by Stasi officers. The woman was subjected to psychological torture and threatened with imprisonment unless she signed an agreement to spy for the Stasi. She agreed. On her return to the American sector, however, the woman reported the incident to security officials. Wolf had committed a felony punishable by up to fifteen years’ imprisonment in West Germany. He was found guilty in March 1977 and sentenced to two years’ probation.
Those who have challenged the application of the statute of limitations to communist crimes, especially to the executions of citizens fleeing to the West, have drawn parallels to the notorious executive orders of Adolf Hitler. Hitler issued orders mandating the summary execution of Soviet Army political commissars upon their capture and initiating the extermination of Jews. An early postwar judicial decision held that these orders were equivalent to law. When that law was declared illegal and retroactively repealed by the West German Bundestag, the statute of limitations was suspended—that is, it never took effect. Many of those convicted in subsequent trials of carrying out the Führer’s orders were executed by the Allies. The German supreme court has ruled the same way as the Bundestag on the order to shoot people trying to escape to West Germany, making the statute of limitations inapplicable to such cases. The ruling made possible the trial of members of the National Defense Council who took part in formulating or promulgating the order. A number of border guards who had shot would-be escapees also have been tried and convicted.
Chief Prosecutor Heiner Sauer, former head of the West German Central Registration Office for Political Crimes, was particularly concerned with the border shootings. His office, located in Salzgitter, West Germany, was established in 1961 as a direct consequence of the Berlin Wall, which was erected on August 13 of that year. Willy Brandt, at the time the city’s mayor (later federal chancellor) had decided that crimes committed by East German border guards should be recorded. At his behest, a central registry of all shootings and other serious border incidents was instituted. Between August 13, 1961 and the opening of the borders on November 9, 1989, 186 border killings were registered. But when the Stasi archives were opened, investigators found that at least 825 people had paid with their lives for trying to escape to the West. This figure was reported to the court that was trying former members of the National Defense Council. In addition to these border incidents, the registry also had recorded a number of similar political offenses committed in the interior of the DDR: By fall 1991, Sauer’s office had registered 4,444 cases of actual or attempted killings and about 40,000 sentences handed down by DDR courts for “political offenses.”
During the early years of Sauer’s operation, the details of political prosecutions became known only when victims were ransomed by West Germany or were expelled. Between 1963 and 1989, West Germany paid DM5 billion (nearly US$3 billion) to the communist regime for the release of 34,000 political prisoners. The price per head varied according to the importance of the person or the length of the sentence. In some cases the ransom amounted to more than US$56,000. The highest sum ever paid to the East Germans appears to have been DM450,000 (US$264,705 using an exchange rate of US$1.70 to the mark). The ransom “object” in this case was Count Benedikt von Hoensbroech. A student in his early twenties, von Hoensbroech was attending a West Berlin university when the wall went up. He was caught by the Stasi while trying to help people escape and was sentenced to ten years at hard labor. The case at-tracted international attention because his family was related to Queen Fabiola of Belgium, who interceded with the East Germans. Smelling money, the East German government first demanded the equivalent of more than US$1 million from the young man’s father as ransom. In the end, the parties settled on the figure of DM450,000, of which the West German gov-ernment paid DM40,000 (about $23,529). Such ransom operations were fully controlled by the Stasi.
Political prisoners released in the DDR could not be registered by the West Germans because their cases remained secret. The victims were admonished to keep quiet or face another prison term. Nonetheless, in the first year after reunification, Sauer’s office added another 20,000 documented cases, for a total of 60,000. Sauer said he believed the final figure of all political prosecutions would be somewhere around 300,000. In every case, the Stasi was involved either in the initial arrest or in pretrial interrogations during which “confessions” were usually extracted by physical or psychological torture, particularly between the mid-1940s and the mid-1960s.
Until 1987, the DDR imposed the death penalty for a number of capital crimes, including murder, espionage, and economic offenses. But after the mid-1950s, nearly all death sentences were kept quiet and executions were carried out in the strictest secrecy, initially by guillotine and in later years by a single pistol shot to the neck. In most instances, the relatives of those killed were not informed either of the sentence or of the execution. The corpses were cremated and the ashes buried secretly, sometimes at construction sites. In reporting about one executioner who shot more than twenty persons to death, the Berlin newspaper Bildzeitung said that a total of 170 civilians had been executed in East Germany. However, Franco Werkenthin, the Berlin official investigating DDR crimes, said he had documented at least three hundred executions. He declined to say how many were for political offenses, because he had not yet submitted his report to parliament. “But it was substantial,” he told me. The true number of executions may never be known because no complete record of death sentences meted out by civil courts could be found. Other death sentences were handed down by military courts, and many records of those are also missing. In addition, German historian Günther Buch believes that about two hundred members of the Stasi itself were executed for various crimes, including attempts to escape to the West.
SAFEGUARDING HUMAN DIGNITY?
The preamble to the East German criminal code stated that the purpose of the code was to “safeguard the dignity of humankind, its freedom and rights under the aegis of the criminal code of the socialist state,” and that “a person can be prosecuted under the criminal code only in strictest concurrence with the law.” However, many of the codified offenses for which East German citizens were prosecuted and imprisoned were unique to totalitarian regimes, both fascist and communist.
Moreover, certain sections of the code, such as those on “Treasonable Relaying of Information” and “Treasonable Agent Activity,” were perversely applied, landing countless East Germans in maximum security penitentiaries. The victims of this perversion of justice usually were persons who had requested legal exit permits from the DDR authorities and had been turned down. In many cases, their “crime” was having contacted a Western consulate to inquire about immigration procedures. Sentences of up to two and a half years’ hard labor were not unusual as punishment for such inquiries.
Engaging in “propaganda hostile to the state” was another punishable offense. In one such case, a young man was arrested and prosecuted for saying that it was not necessary to station tanks at the border and for referring to border fortifications as “nonsense.” During his trial, he “admitted” to owning a television set on which he watched West German programs and later told friends what he saw. One of those “friends” had denounced him to the Stasi. The judge considered the accused’s actions especially egregious and sentenced him to a year and a half at hard labor.
Ironically, another part of this section of the criminal code decreed that “glorifying militarism” also was a punishable offense, although the DDR itself “glorified” its People’s Army beyond any Western norm. That army was clad in uniforms and insignia identical to those of the Nazi Wehrmacht, albeit without eagles and swastikas. The helmets, too, were differently shaped, but the Prussian goose step was regulation during parades.
A nineteen-year-old who had placed a sign in an apartment window reading “When justice is turned into injustice, resistance becomes an obligation!” was rewarded with twenty-two months in the penitentiary. Earlier, the youth had applied for an exit visa and had been turned down. A thirty-four-year-old father of two who also had been denied permission to leave the “workers’ and peasants’ state” with his family similarly advertised that fact with a poster reading “We want to leave, but they won’t let us.” The man went to prison for sixteen months. The “crimes” of both men were covered by a law on “Interference in Activities of the State or Society.”
Two letters—one to a friend in West Germany, seeking assistance to legally emigrate to the West, and another containing a similar appeal to Chief of State Honecker—brought a four-year sentence to their writer, who was convicted under two laws: those on “establishing illegal contacts” (writing to his friend) and on “public denigration” (writing to Honecker). The Stasi had illegally intercepted both letters.
The East German party chiefs were not content to rely only on the Stasi’s millions of informers to ferret out antistate sentiments. Leaving nothing to chance, they created a law that made the failure to denounce fellow citizens a crime punishable by up to five years’ imprisonment. One man was sentenced to twenty-three months for failing to report that a friend of his was preparing to escape to the West. The mandatory denunciation law had its roots in the statutes of the Socialist Unity Party, which were published in the form of a little red booklet. I picked up a copy of this booklet that had been discarded by its previous owner, a Stasi chauffeur, who had written “Ha, Ha” next to the mandate to “report any misdeeds, regardless of the person responsible, to leading party organs, all the way up to the Central Committee.”
Rupert Scholz, member of parliament and professor of law at the University of Munich, said many East Germans feel there is little determination among their Western brethren to bring the Stasi criminals to trial. “In fact, we already have heard many of them say that the peaceful revolution should have been a bloody one instead so they could have done away with their tormentors by hanging them posthaste,” Scholz told me.
The Reverend Joachim Gauck, minister to a Lutheran parish in East Germany, shared the people’s pessimism that justice would be done. Following reunification, Gauck was appointed by the Bonn government as its special representative for safeguarding and maintaining the Stasi archives. “We must at least establish a legal basis for finding the culprits in our files,” Gauck told me. “But it will not be easy. If you stood the millions of files upright in one line, they would stretch for 202 kilometers [about 121 miles]. In those files you can find an unbe-lievable number of Stasi victims and their tormentors.”
Gauck was given the mandate he needed in November 1991, when the German parliament passed a law authorizing file searches to uncover Stasi perpetrators and their informants. He viewed this legislation as first step in the right direction. With the evidence from Stasi files, the perpetrators could be removed from their public service jobs without any formal legal pro-ceedings. Said Gauck: “We needed this law badly. It is not reasonable that persons who served this apparatus of oppression remain in positions of trust. We need to win our people over to accepting that they are now free and governed by the rule of law. To achieve that, we must build up their confidence and trust in the public service.”
Searching the roughly six million files will take years. A significant number of the dossiers are located in repositories of the Stasi regional offices, sprinkled throughout eastern Germany. To put the files at the Berlin central repository in archival order would take one person 128 years. The job might have been made easier had the last DDR government not ordered the burning of thousands of Stasi computer tapes, ostensibly to forestall a witch-hunt. Thousands of files dealing with espionage were shredded and packed into 17,200 paper sacks. These were discovered when the Stasi headquarters was stormed on January 15, 1990. The contents of all of these bags now have been inspected. It took two workers between six and eight weeks to go through one bag. Then began the work of the puzzlers, putting the shredded pieces together. By the middle of 1997, fewer than 500 bags of shredded papers had been reconstructed—into about 200,000 pages. Further complicating matters was the lack of trained archivists and experts capable of organizing these files—to say nothing of the 37.5 million index cards bearing the names of informers as well as persons under Stasi surveillance—and interpreting their contents. Initially, funding for a staff of about 550 individuals was planned, at a total of about DM24.5 million annually (about US$15 million using an exchange rate of US$1.60). By 1997, the budget had grown to US$137 million and the staff to 3,100.
Stasi victims and citizens who had been under surveillance were allowed to examine their Stasi files. Within four years of reunification, about 860,000 persons had asked to inspect their case files, with 17,626 of those requests being received in December 1994 alone. By 1997, 3.4 million people had asked to see their files. Countless civil suits were launched when victims found the names of those who had denounced and betrayed them, and many family relationships and friendships were destroyed.
The rehabilitation of Stasi victims and financial restitution to them was well under way; but Gauck believed that criminal prosecution of the perpetrators would continue to be extremely difficult. “We can already see that leading SED functionaries who bear responsibility for the inhumane policies, for which they should be tried, are instead accused of lesser offenses such as corruption. It is actually an insult to democracy that a man like Harry Tisch is tried for embezzlement and not for being a member of the Politburo, where the criminal policies originated.”
The “Stasi files law,” as it is popularly known, also made it possible to vet parliamentarians for Stasi connections. Hundreds were fired or resigned—and a few committed suicide—when it was discovered that they had been Stasi informants. Among those who resigned was Lothar de Maiziere, the last premier of the DDR, who signed the unification agreement with West German Chancellor Helmut Kohl. He was a member of the East German version of the Christian Democratic Union, which like all noncommunist parties in the Eastern bloc had been totally co-opted by the regime. After reunification, he moved into parliament and was awarded the vice chairmanship of Kohl’s Christian Democratic Union. A lawyer, De Maiziere had functioned for years as an IM, an informer, under the cover name Cerny. De Maiziere at first denied he was Cerny, but the evidence was overwhelming. It was De Maiziere’s government that had ordered the destruction of the Stasi computer tapes.
THE COMMUNISTS’ POLITICAL SURVIVAL
De Maiziere, who had been a driving force behind prompt reunification, soon passed into oblivion; but twenty members of the old Communist Party, the SED, are still members of parliament. The SED changed its name in late 1989, when the DDR was collapsing, to the Party of Democratic Socialism (PDS). Its new leadership arrogantly dismissed their bloody past as irrelevant now that the word democratic had been adopted as part of their party’s name. If the elections of summer 1990 had taken place just a few months later and thus had been conducted under the law of reunified Germany, these individuals would not have won parliamentary seats. The West German electoral rules governing the proportional representation system require that a party garner at least 5 percent of the vote before it may enter parliament. In addition to choosing a party, voters cast a second ballot for a specific person. This is called a direct mandate. If any party falls below 5 percent but gets at least three direct mandates, that party is seated in parliament. As a one-time compromise in consideration of East Germany’s smaller population, the Bonn government accepted a 3-percent margin of party votes. Even so, the PDS barely made it into parliament.
In the 1994 general election, the first after reunification, the party polled 4.4 percent. Had it not been for the votes electing four persons by direct mandate, the PDS would have been excluded. The direct mandates all came from East Berlin districts heavily populated by unemployed, former Communist Party and government officials. One of the men elected directly was Gregor Gysi, a communist lawyer who had been accused of informing on his clients to the Stasi. Gysi denied the allegations and had obtained a temporary injunction barring a former East German dissident from making the assertion. However, a Hamburg court lifted the injunction in December 1994 on the basis of Stasi documents that indicated Gysi had no case.
Another candidate directly elected to parliament was Stefan Heym, a German-born writer who had emigrated to the United States after Hitler came to power, had changed his name from Helmut Flieg, and had become a U.S. citizen. He served in the U.S. Army as an officer during World War II, but switched sides in 1952 to live in East Germany, forfeiting his U.S. citizenship in order to become an East German citizen and a member of the Communist Party. A year later, on June 17, 1953, the East German people rose up in a revolt that was crushed by the Red Army. Had it not been for the intervention of the Soviets, Heym wrote afterward in the communist daily newspaper Berliner Zeitung, “the American bombing would have already begun. The shots against the rebels were fired to prevent war, rather than to begin one.” And when Stalin died, just four months earlier, Heym used the same newspaper to mourn the butcher of an estimated twenty million people as the “most loved man of our times.” Finally, in a speech on January 31, 1995, at a demonstration marking the 62nd anniversary of the Nazi takeover, the unrepentant Heym, now eighty-two years old, had the gall to say that the present climate in Germany was “very similar to that in 1933, and this frightens me.” It was a grotesque spectacle when Heym was accorded the “honor” of delivering the opening address of the 1965 parliamentary session traditionally reserved for the body’s oldest member. Despite vehement protests, parliamentary president Rita Süssmuth ruled to uphold the tradition.
One of the PDS members also retaining his seat was Hans Modrow. Modrow, a veteran communist, was SED district secretary in Dresden. It was a most powerful communal political position. Modrow was a vital cog in the apparatus of state repression. The local Stasi chief, Major General Horst Böhm, reported directly to him. Modrow was the one who ordered the Vopo, the People’s Police, to resort to violence in putting down massive protests during the turbulent days in fall 1989, just before the Berlin Wall fell. Hundreds of protesters were severely beaten and jailed. Böhm, the Dresden Stasi boss, was found shot dead in his office in early 1990, just before he was to appear before a commission that had been convened to settle the future of the communist state. His death was listed as a suicide. However, an unsubstantiated rumor has it that he was murdered to prevent him from testifying about Modrow’s despotic rule. Modrow was found guilty of election fraud in May 1993. The DDR hierarchy, according to the evidence, had ordered that the number of votes opposing the official slate in the 1989 election had to be fewer than in 1985. Modrow reported that only 2.5 percent of the ballots in his district were cast in opposition; but the true number was at least four times higher. The judge issued him a mere rebuke, refusing to imprison or fine him. The federal high court, which reviews sentences, ordered in November 1994 that Modrow stand trial again because the sentence “was too mild.” After a new trial in 1996 on charges of perjury, Modrow was sentenced to six months’ probation. A year later, parliament was still considering whether he should be deprived of his seat.
Unlike the Nazi Party’s finances and property, which were confiscated by the victorious Allies and turned over to the first West German government in 1949, the SED’s millions were inherited by the PDS, which spirited part of those funds out of the country when the East German government collapsed. The PDS also became custodian of the archives of the SED and refused anyone outside the party access to them. Shortly after reunification, in 1990, the courts ruled that the archives were state property. Judicial authorities as well as scholars were permitted to research them. Nevertheless, the SED archives were almost lost. In 1994, the German news magazine Focus discovered a letter dated March 1991, sent by Gregor Gysi in the capacity of PDS party chief to Vladimir A. Ivashko, assistant secretary-general of the Soviet Union’s Communist Party. In this letter, Gysi pleaded with Soviet leaders either to put pressure on German Chancellor Helmut Kohl to return the archive to the PDS, or if Kohl felt this was politically impossible, to destroy it. The opening of the archive, Gysi wrote, was a “genuine catastrophe,” because it contained many secret documents. Publication of the documents would have “extremely unpleasant results not only for the PDS but for the Communist Party of the Soviet Union as well,” Gysi wrote. But his Soviet friends were no longer able to help him. The archive holds documents on Politburo decisions and directives that might prove crucial in prosecuting the former East German party hierarchy. In the end, the PDS offered to settle for 20 percent of the SED’s ill-gotten funds, forfeiting the rest as a gesture of goodwill toward the new state.
Not all observers were impressed by this compromise. Peter Gauweiler, Bavaria’s minister for development and ecological affairs at the time of reunification, and a member of the Christian Democratic Party, demanded that the PDS and the Deutsche Kommunistische Partei (DKP, the West German Communist Party), be outlawed: “Every month we learn of new crimes committed by the SED—terrible things, gruesome things,” Gauweiler said. “We cannot tolerate a successor organization to such an extremely criminal gang.”
Become a Patron!
True Information is the most valuable resource and we ask you to give back.
Sixty years after the Berlin Wall was erected, the spectre of the Stasi continues to loom over Germany.
Become a Patron!
True Information is the most valuable resource and we ask you to give back.
The Stasi spied on Silke Orphal and Ilona Seeber for years – after they applied to go to the West. Thirty years after the fall of the Berlin Wall, they both look back at their Stasi files. The Stasi files of Silke Orphal and Ilona Seeber include intercepted letters, official documents and countless reports by spies who meticulously noted everything about their lives, including the turning on and off of lights.
When Silke Orphal and Ilona Seeber, who were both ordinary typists at Neues Deutschland – the official newspaper of the Socialist Unity Party – applied to leave the GDR, it was considered scandalous. They were ostracized at work, threatened and subjected to interrogations that lasted hours. What did the experience do to them? How do they look back on that time today? A report by Axel Rowohlt.
Become a Patron!
True Information is the most valuable resource and we ask you to give back.
In a musty room somewhere inside a maze of offices in east Berlin, two women are working patiently on what may be the biggest puzzle the world has ever seen – more than half a billion pieces that together detail innumerable actions committed by East Germany’s secret police.
Continue reading “STASI: East Germany’s Secret Police -East Germany’s Stasi Files”Become a Patron!
True Information is the most valuable resource and we ask you to give back.
Liebe Leser,
den Blog “Gerd Benenwirtz” habe ich nicht oder usere Redakteure gestartet. Es ist vielmehr eine neue, plumpe Fälschung der CYBER-STASI-Legastheniker-Bande “GoMoPa”.
Wir würden den Namen nicht falsch schreiben.
Dabei sieht man wieder, dass diese Bande mit ALLEN ERDENKLICHEN METHODEN arbeitet.
Herzliche Grüsse
Magister Bernd Pulch
PS Auch hier ist eine englische Übersetzung aus bekannten Grüden unnötig.
Become a Patron!
True Information is the most valuable resource and we ask you to give back.
Liebe Leser,
Der ominöse “Blog”.
“DIE SCH****HAUSFLIEGE” so nennt der mutmassliche Stasi-Agent, Dioxin-Mörder und tatsächlich dutzende Male vorbestrafte Serienbetrüger Klaus-Dieter Maurischat seinen Blog:
Das muss man sich auf der Zunge zergehen lassen: “”DIE SCH****HAUSFLIEGE”
Das Höchstmass an Seriösität spricht schon aus der Namenswahl, dementsprechend sind auch die Infos und die Zuträger etwa- der dubiose Peter Ehlers, Strohmann von Fondsvermittler Gerd Bennewirtz.
Bis 2007 hiess ihr SJB-Werbeblatt “Der Fonds”. Dann hiess es “das Investment” – jetzt wollen sie das Original sein, obwohl wir in Deutschland seit 2000 erwiesenermassen auf dem Markt sind und in den angelsächischen Ländern schon viel länger – Methode “Big Brother” aus George Orwells “1984”.
Der Serienbetrüger Maurischat zeigt die Methode auf: Er kupfert unsere Artikel und die anderer Journalisten ab und versucht diese per Fälschung gegen uns zu verwenden – der Gipfel der unverschämten Lächerlichkeit.
Auf die anderen Absurditäten braucht man noch weniger einzugehen. Hingegen werden kritische Berichte gegen sie schnell gelöscht durch die hauseigene Google-Lösch-Truppe Marke RA Resch bzw durch Hacker-Promnys-Billig-Tricks überlagert.
All das kann den Wahrheits- und Reinigungsprozess zwar verlangsamen, aber nicht stoppen.
Offensichtlich ist der öffentliche Druck gegen die (Ruf)-Mörder von der CYBER-STASI schon so stark, dass sie immer mehr Fehler begehen und ihr wahres Naturell zeigen – das der tatsächlich vorbestraften Serienbetrüger, Rufmörder und wahrscheinlich sogar tatsächlichen Mörder.
Eine weitere absurde Pointe ist, dass Klaus-Dieter Maurischat unter seinen vielen Verurteilungen auch eine Verurteilung wegen des Betruges an seinem eigenen “GoMoPa”-Anleger hat (AZ: 28 Ls 85/05).
siehe
Ich hoffe Ihnen diesbezüglich bald weitere positive Fakten zum Schutz und im Interesse aller seriösen Marktteilnehmer liefern zu können.
Einen schönen Wochenausklang wünsche ich Ihnen.
Herzlichst Ihr
Magister Bernd Pulch
PS Diesen Artikel habe ich nur in Deutsch geschrieben, da dies für Amerikaner und Engländer sowieso ein vollkommen absurdes Theater wäre und sogar alte Vorurteile gegen uns Deutsche evozieren wüde.
Become a Patron!
True Information is the most valuable resource and we ask you to give back.
Liebe Leser, dear User
again the criminals are misusing my name after using Bpulch on twitter they now use also PulchBernd.
The twitter name Pulch is the original. Der Twitter-name Pulch ist das Original.
They did the same thing by using the name of our magazine “INVESTMENT”.
Deswegen heisst unsere Zeitschrift auch “INVESTMENT – das Original”.
Mittlerweile sind 30% der Besucher der von uns unterstützten, aber unabhängigen SJB-Fonds-Opfer.com-Webseite durch den Suchbegriff “Peter Ehlers-Betrug” auf die Webseite gelangt. Das spricht für sich.
Markenpiraten outen sich eben jeden Tag.
Meanwhile 30% of the visitors of the independet website http://www.sjb-fonds-opfer.com came by using the search term “Peter Ehlers – betrayal”…
Such trademark pirates are outing themselves every day.
It is clear now for everybody that they can not resist the punishment of God and the law.
Wieder zeigt die CYBER-STASI ihr wahres Gesicht. Nachdem sie sich schon den Namen BPulch widerrechtlich angeeignet haben, nun auch PulchBernd.
Genauso sind sie auch mit dem Namen meiner Zeitschrft INVESTMENT” verfahren.
Doch eines ist jetzt schon klar. Wer zu solchen Methoden greifen muss, kann im Markt nicht bestehen.
Identity theft is a form of fraud or cheating of another person’s identity in which someone pretends to be someone else by assuming that person’s identity, typically in order to access resources or obtain credit and other benefits in that person’s name. The victim of identity theft (here meaning the person whose identity has been assumed by the identity thief) can suffer adverse consequences if he or she is held accountable for the perpetrator’s actions. Organizations and individuals who are duped or defrauded by the identity thief can also suffer adverse consequences and losses, and to that extent are also victims.
The term identity theft was coined in 1964[1] and is actually a misnomer, since it is not literally possible to steal an identity as such – more accurate terms would be identity fraud or impersonation or identity cloningbut identity theft has become commonplace.
“Determining the link between data breaches and identity theft is challenging, primarily because identity theft victims often do not know how their personal information was obtained,” and identity theft is not always detectable by the individual victims, according to a report done for the FTC.[2] Identity fraud is often but not necessarily the consequence of identity theft. Someone can steal or misappropriate personal information without then committing identity theft using the information about every person, such as when a major data breach occurs. A US Government Accountability Office study determined that “most breaches have not resulted in detected incidents of identity theft”.[3] the report also warned that “the full extent is unknown”. A later unpublished study by Carnegie Mellon University noted that “Most often, the causes of identity theft is not known,” but reported that someone else concluded that “the probability of becoming a victim to identity theft as a result of a data breach is … around only 2%”.[4] More recently, an association of consumer data companies noted that one of the largest data breaches ever, accounting for over four million records, resulted in only about 1,800 instances of identity theft, according to the company whose systems were breached.[5]
A recent article entitled, “Cyber Crime Made Easy” explained the level to which hackers are using malicious software. As one security specialist named Gunter Ollmann said, “Interested in credit card theft? There’s an app for that.” This statement summed up the ease with which these hackers are accessing all kinds of information online. The new program for infecting users’ computers is called Zeus; and the program is so hacker friendly that even an inexperienced hacker can operate it. Although the hacking program is easy to use, that fact does not diminish the devastating effects that Zeus (or other software like Zeus) can do to a computer and the user. For example, the article stated that programs like Zeus can steal credit card information, important documents, and even documents necessary for homeland security. If the hacker were to gain this information, it would mean identity theft or even a possible terrorist attack. (Giles, Jim. “Cyber Crime Made Easy.” New Scientist 205.2752 (2010): 20-21. Academic Search Premier. EBSCO. Web. 3 Oct. 2010.)
Als Identitätsdiebstahl (auch Identitätsbetrug, Identitätsmissbrauch; engl. Identity Theft), wird die missbräuchliche Nutzung personenbezogener Daten (der Identität) einer natürlichen Person durch Dritte bezeichnet.
Die Bezeichnung als „Identitätsdiebstahl“ ist zwar sehr häufig, trifft aber die Sachlage nicht so gut, wie „Identitätsmissbrauch“, weil bei einem typischen Diebstahl dem Berechtigten etwas weggenommen wird, sodaß er es anschließend selbst nicht mehr hat. Beim Identitätsdiebstahl kann der Berechtigte seine Identität aber weiter verwenden.
Ziel eines Identitätsdiebstahls kann es sein, einen betrügerischen Vermögensvorteil zu erreichen oder den rechtmäßigen Inhaber der Identität in Misskredit zu bringen (Rufschädigung).
Bei einem Identitätsdiebstahl wird neben dem Namen eine Reihe persönlicher Daten wie beispielsweise Geburtsdatum, Anschrift, Führerschein- oder Sozialversicherungsnummern, Bankkonto– oderKreditkartennummern genutzt, um die Feststellung der tatsächlichen eigenen Identität zu umgehen oder diese zu verfälschen. Je mehr zueinander passende Daten der Missbrauchende hat, desto sicherer wird ihm die Vorspiegelung gelingen.
Bereits erlangte Daten können zur Ermittlung weiterer Daten genutzt werden. So geriet z.B. die Versicherungswirtschaft kürzlich in Erklärungsprobleme, weil ein Fernsehsender über zufällig im Strassenverkehr ausgewählte Kfz-Kennzeichen an die Versicherungsdaten der Halter – insbesondere die vollständigen Anschriften – gelangte und der Reporter dann bei den Fahrzeughaltern an der Tür erschien. Dabei wurde in den Telephongesprächen zunächst ein Unfall behauptet, mit dem man über den Zentralruf der Autoversicherer immer an den Namen der Versicherung und die Vertragsnummer kommt. Dann wurde bei der ermittelten Versicherung mit der Vertragsnummer angerufen und z.B. behauptet, man sei gerade umgezogen und wolle nur die Richtigkeit der Anschrift prüfen. In der Regel wurde dann von der betreffenden Versicherung der Name des Halters und die Anschrift genannt – im guten Glauben, daß man mit dem Halter spreche.
Die missbräuchliche Nutzung einer fremden Identität kann für die Opfer zur Verschuldung oder – wenn kriminelle Handlungen im Namen des Opfers des Identitätsdiebstahls durchgeführt werden – zu ungerechtenStrafen führen. Wird der Missbrauch aufgedeckt, so wird der Täter nicht nur für den Mißbrauch selbst bestraft, sondern muß den angerichteten finanziellen Schaden tragen und die Strafen für die im Namen des Opfers begangenen Taten übernehmen.
Insbesondere im E-Commerce, beispielsweise beim Durchführen von Transaktionen über das Internet-Auktionshaus Ebay, das bisher keine rechtsverbindliche Identitätsfeststellung durchführt, kannIdentitätsdiebstahl erhebliche Auswirkungen auf die Geschäftspartner haben. Nach den Urteilen des OLG Köln vom 6. September 2002, Aktenzeichen: 19 U 16/02 und des Amtsgerichts Erfurt vom 14. September 2001, Aktenzeichen: 28 C 2354/01 muss bei Vertragsabschlüssen im Internet der Verkäufer beweisen, dass der Käufer identisch mit dem angeblichen Account-Inhaber ist. Geschädigte durch Identitätsdiebstahl wehren sich nach Bekanntwerden der Straftat am effektivsten durch eine Strafanzeige (auch gegen Unbekannt) bei der örtlichen Polizei.
Illegal operierende Auskunfteien manipulieren durch Phishing, Pharming, und Spoofing die Computer der jeweiligen Zielpersonen und verschaffen sich damit zunächst die Identität (zum Beispiel Nickname in Verbindung mit einem Kennwort). Mit dieser gestohlenen Identität verschaffen sie sich dann Zugang zu Daten bei Onlineberatungen, Kontaktportalen, Internet-Auktionshäusern und anderen (Informationsdiebstahl) und vermarkten die gewonnenen Daten an „interessierte Kreise“ (Kriminelle).
Natürlich sind die Kriminellen der CYBER-STASI auf der Flucht oder im Zuchthaus.
Naturally the serial criminals of the CYBER-STASI is on the run or in detention.
Mit besten Grüssen
My warmest regards
Magister Bernd Pulch
Become a Patron!
True Information is the most valuable resource and we ask you to give back.
Aktenzeichen ST/0148943/2011: Immer wieder verfremden die vorbestraften Serienbetrüger Pressemeldungen von uns und der SJB-GoMoPa-Opfer (http://www.sjb-fonds-opfer.com) und verfälschen sie, um Verwirrung zu stiften und von ihren eigenen Taten abzulenken. Die persönlichen Angriffe gegen mich und andere Personen aus meinem Umfeld, sollen uns dazu bewegen, die kritischen Berichte über die Cyber-Stasi des 21. Jahrhunderts und deren Hintermänner einzustellen, sowie sie zuvor viele andere Journalisten eingeschüchtert haben, so dass deren Beiträge dann gelöscht wurden. Im Interesse aller Marktteilnehmer werden wir das ganz gewiss NICHT tun.
Dies ist uns vielmehr ein Ansporn und eine Verpflichtung, die Öffentlichkeit über das Treiben der Cybermörder und wohl auch realen Mörder aufzuklären, damit diesen Stasi-Verbrechern, das Handwerk gelegt wird und sie nicht noch mehr rechtschaffene Menschen mit ihrem hahnebüchernen Unsinn verleumden, erpressen, betrügen und sie dann sogar ermorden können.
Deshalb hier noch einmal zur Klarstellung: Der vorbestrafte Erpresser, Betrüger und wohl auch mutmassliche Mörder Heinz Gerlachs Klaus-Dieter Maurischat (Bild oben) ist auf der Flucht.
Bereits einmal, im Dezember 2008, wurde er in Berlin auf Betreiben von Meridian Capital festgenommen. Zuvor sind er und sein mutmasslicher Komplize laut Meridian Capital bereits 23 verurteilt worden.
Dokumente hierzu unter:
http://sjb-fonds-opfer.com/?page_id=11764
Näheres zu Maurischat:
Über eine selbstgebaute Blogseite verbreiten die GoMoPa-Gangster eine gefälschte Stellung von Meridian Capital, um Verwirrung zu stiften.
Diese Blogseite existiert erst seit Deztember 2010.
Beweis:
http://www.hypestat.com/pressreleaser.org
Die Meridian Capital-Seite, das Original,
http://othergomopa.blogspot.com/
ist dagegen bereits seit 2009 online
Beweis: Aussage Meridian Capital
und
KLAUS DIETER MAURISCHAT IN DETENTION
Source: http://klaus-dieter-maurischat.blogspot.com/2009/01/klaus-dieter-maurischat-in-haft.html
Hinzu kommt Verurteilung wegen Betruges am eigenen Anleger sowie die Kursmanipulation in Sachen Wirecard etc pp.-
Hier exemplarisch die Verurteilung wegen Betruges am eigenen Anleger:
Klaus Maurischat und Mark Vornkahl, Betreiber vonwww.gomopa.net: Am 24. April 2006 war die Verhandlung am Amtsgericht Krefeld in der Betrugssache: Mark Vornkahl / Klaus Maurischat ./. Dehnfeld. Aktenzeichen: 28 Ls 85/05 Klaus MaurischatLange Straße 3827313 Dörverden.Das in diesem Verfahren ausschließlich diese Betrugsache verhandelt wurde, ist das Urteil gegen Klaus Maurischat recht mäßig ausgefallen.Zusammenfassung der Verhandlung vom 24.04.2006 vor dem Schöffengericht des AG Krefeld in der Sache gegen Klaus Maurischat und Mark Vornkahl.Zur Hauptverhandlung erschienen:Richter Dr. Meister, 2 Schöffen,Staatsanwalt, Angeklagter Klaus Maurischat, vertr. durch RA Meier, Berlin; aus der U-Haft zur Verhandlung überführt.1. Eine Gerichtsvollzieherin stellt unter Ausschuss der Öffentlichkeit eine Urkunde an den Angeklagten Maurischat zu.2. Bei Mark Vornkahl wurde im Gerichtssaal eineTaschenpfändung vorgenommen.Beginn der HauptverhandlungDie Beklagten verzichten auf eine Einlassung zu Beginn.Nach Befragung des Zeugen Denfeld zum Sachverhalt wurde dieVerhandlung auf Wunsch der Staatsanwaltschaft und den Verteidigern unterbrochen.Der Angeklagte Maurischat gab nach Fortsetzung derHauptverhandlung Folgendes zu Protokoll:Er sähe ein, dass das Geld auf das falsche Konto gegangen sei und nicht dem eigentlichen Verwendungszweck zugeführt wurde. Das Geld sei aber zurückgezahlt worden und er distanziere sich ausdrücklich von einem Betrug.Schließung der BeweisaufnahmeDer Staatsanwalt verließt sein PlädoyerEr halte am Vorwurf des Betruges fest. Mit Hinweis auf die einschlägigen Vorstrafen des Angekl. Maurischatund auf laufende Ermittlungsverfahren, beantrage er ein Strafmaß von 1 Jahr und 6 Monaten.Er halte dem Angeklagten zu Gute, dass dieserWiedergutmachung geleistet habe, und dass dieser geständig war. Zudem läge die letzte Verurteilung wegen Betruges 11 Jahre zurück. Auch sei der Geschädigte nicht in existentielle Not geraten, wobei der Staatsanwalt nicht über noch laufende Verfahren hinweg sehen könne. Er läge aber dem Angeklagten Maurischat nahe, keine weiteren Aktivitäten im Bezirk der Staatsanwaltschaft Krefeld auszuüben, insbesondere möchte er, dass keine weiteren Anleger im Bezirk der Staatsanwaltschaft Krefeld durch GoMoPa akquiriert werden.Die Freiheitsstrafe soll zur Bewährung ausgesetzt werden.Plädoyer des Verteidigers des Angekl. Maurischat, Herrn RA MeierEr schließe sich, wie (in der Unterbrechung) vereinbart, dem Staatsanwalt an.Es stimme, dass sein Mandant Fehler in seiner Vergangenheit gemacht habe, und dass er auch diesmal einen Fehler begangen haben könnte, jedoch sei der Hinweis wichtig, dass sein Mandant aus diesen Fehlern gelernt habe.Der Angeklagte haben das letzte Wort.Maurischat sagt, es sei bereits alles gesagt worden.Unterbrechung zu Hauptverhandlung. Der Richter zieht sich mit den Schöffen zur Beratung zurück.Urteilsverkündung:Der Angeklagte wird des gemeinschaftlichen Betrugs für schuldig befunden.Der Angeklagte Klaus Maurischat wird zu einerFreiheitsstrafe von 1 Jahr und 6 Monaten verurteilt. Diese wird zur Bewährung ausgesetzt.Die Bewährungszeit wird auf 3 Jahre festgesetzt.Der Haftbefehl gegen Klaus Maurischat wird aufgehoben.Der Angeklagte trage die Kosten des Verfahrens.UrteilsbegründungDer Richter erklärt, dass eine Täuschung des Geschädigtenvorliegt und somit keine Untreue in Betracht kommen kann.Die Fragen, ob es sich um einen Anlagebetrug handele sei irrelevant. Er hält den Angeklagten die geleistete Wiedergutmachung zu Gute.Ebenso ist das Geständnis für die Angeklagten zu werten. Zudem liegt die letzte Verurteilung des Angeklagten Maurischat 11 Jahre zurück.Die Parteien verzichten auf Rechtsmittel. Das Urteil ist somit rechtskräftig.Mit dem heutigen Urteil endet ein Kapitel in derBetrugssache Goldman Morgenstern & Partners, Klaus Maurischat und Mark Vornkahl.Alle GoMoPa.net Verantwortlichen, Maurischat, Vornkahl und Henneberg sind nun vorbestrafte Abzocker und Betrüger und die Zukunft der Pseudoklitsche GoMoPa.net sieht duster aus.Mir dem Geständnis der beiden ABZOCKER MAURISCHAT UND VORNKAHL vor Gericht bricht ein jahrelangaufrechterhaltenes Lügengeflecht von einigen primitiven Betrügern zusammen. Gewohnheitsverbrecher und Denunzianten,die rechtschaffene Personen und Firmen in ihren Verbrecherforen kriminalisierten.
Weitere Infos an die Kriminalpolizei
ST/0148943/2011
Become a Patron!
True Information is the most valuable resource and we ask you to give back.
Little Klaus-Adolf (Maurisc) hahahaha (t) in his cute pink uniform
He fakes our Press releases and changes the names what a bloody good comedian
Erwiesen – Hilfsschüler und Magister Bernd Pulch von der Klitsche …
vor 8 Stunden gefunden – Die eigentlichen Köpfe von „General Global Media Ltd“ sind meiner Meinung nach wohl Stefan Schramm und STASI-Oberst Ehrenfried Stelzer. Bernd Pulch hat …
http://www.free-press-release.com/news-erwiesen-hilfssch-ler-und-magister-bernd-pulch-von-der-klitsche-general-global-media-ltd-war-stasi-offizier-…
more jokes from STASI-Klaus-Adolf at
http://sjb-fonds-opfer.com/?page_id=3683
Become a Patron!
True Information is the most valuable resource and we ask you to give back.
Herewith we publish the original document about the detention of Klaus Maurischat.
Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. unveils new criminal phenomena in network I. In recently appeared on the net more often at the same time a new a very worrying phenomenon of criminal nature. Professional criminals groups in the network are taking part, to extortion, fraud, Erschwindeln relating to certain specifically selected companies and businesses are capable of. These criminals developed new methods and means, simply and in a short time to bereichern.Strategien and manifestations, which underlie this process are fairly simple. A criminal is looking to “carefully” on the Internet specific companies and corporations (victims of crime) and informed them in the next step, that of the business activities of such companies and corporations in the near future – first on the Internet then in other available mass media – numerous and very unfavorable information appears. At the same time, the criminals beat their future victims an effective means of reducing unnecessary difficulties and problems to escape the loss of good name and image of the company and corporate sector. These offenders are aware of that reputation, name and appearance of each company is a value in itself. It was therefore a value of what each company is prepared to pay any price. But the reason for difficulties and problems arising from the loss of good name and reputation result. The criminals and their victims are already aware that this loss is devastating consequences might have been the closing down of a particular business can enforce. It takes both to No as well as at large companies regard. The company is concerned that in virtually every industry in each country and cross-border activities sind.Das criminal procedure in the form of a blackmail on money, a fraud is becoming rapidly and globally, ie led cross-border and internationally. Among the victims of extortion, fraud is now looking both at home (domestic) and international corporations, the major emphasis on conservation, keeping and maintaining their reputation in the business according to their credibility lay. The criminals in the network have understood that maintaining an unassailable reputation and name of a company the unique ability to provide fast and easy enrichment forms. The above-mentioned criminal procedure is difficult to track because it is international in nature, and by overlapping or even nonexistent (fictional) professional and judicial persons in various countries and operated company wird.Diese offenders in the network publish it and disseminate false information about your victims on remote servers, which are not uncommon in many exotic countries. There are those countries in which serious gaps in the legal system, investigative and prosecution procedures are visible. As an example, at this point mention India werden. Mit criminals working in the network grid portals known leader of blogs with your seat-consciously or unconsciously, even in highly developed countries. For example, at this point, countries such as Germany, Austria, Switzerland, the United States, Britain, Spain or Portugal are mentioned. The below listed criminals were able to act unpunished today. As a symptom of such action appears here the activity and “effectiveness” of the company GOMOPA, which is on countries such as Germany, Switzerland, Austria, the United States, Britain, Spain and India. A good example of such an action is Mr. Klaus Mauri Chat – the leader and “brain” of the company GOMOPA with many already in force and criminal judgments “on his account”, which in this way for years and funded its maintenance in the industry almost unlimited activity. This status will change dramatically, however, including far and wide thanks to discontinued operations of the firm Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. who would oppose such offenses addressed in the network. Other companies and corporations, in which the crime network and outside of this medium have fallen victim to contribute to combating such crimes bei.Die situation is changing, thanks to effective steps and the successful cooperation of the firm Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. with the international police Interpol, with the federal agency (FBI) in the U.S., the Federal Criminal Police in Germany, with Scotland Yard in Britain, as well as with the Russian secret service FSB.Die Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. – Together with other companies and cooperations, the victim of criminal activities of the network of crime have fallen – has undeniably already started to yield results. The fact that in recent weeks (November 2008) on the territory of the Federal Republic of Germany of the above-mentioned leaders and “brain” of the company GOMOPA, Mr Klaus Maurishat was arrested should not be ignored. The Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. information available results clearly show that the next arrests of persons participating in this process in such countries as: Austria, Switzerland, Russia, Ukraine, Poland, Spain, Mexico, Portugal, Brazil, the USA, Canada, UK, Ireland , Australia, New Zealand and made in a.. The ultimate goal of Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. and the other victims of crime in the network is to provide all participants in this criminal procedure before the competent court to lead. All professional and judicial persons, regardless of the seat and out of the business, which the above-described criminal action (fraud, extortion) to have fallen victim can of Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. led company to join the goal set at all at this point the procedure described those associated in the public and the economic life out. II blacklist blackmail and with international fraudsters and their methods (opus operandi) in the following countries: 1 The Federal Republic Deutschland2. Dubai 3rd Russia 1st The Federal Republic of Germany GmbH GOMOPA, Goldman Morgenstern & Partners LLC., Goldman Morgenstern & Partners Consulting LLC, Wottle collection. In these firms are quite active following persons: – Klaus Mauri Chat ( “Father” and “brain” of the criminal organization responsible for countless final judgments have been achieved (arrested in Germany in November 2008) – Josef Rudolf Heckel ( “right hand “when Mr Klaus Mauri chat, denounced former banker who is excessive in many Bankschmuggeleien was involved.
(Today, persona non grata in the German banking industry); – Peter Reski (responsible for Finance, known for fraud, tax fraud and embezzlement, which is already behind the judgments are final) – Mark Vornkahl (responsible for organizational and administrative tasks in GOMOPA, a former police officer dismissed because of numerous expectations in the service, already has a few final judgments “on his account”); – Claus i Ulrike Wottle (married couple, for the so-called “unconventional” enforcement of the debt for the benefit GOMOPA. This execution was imposing, with extortion violence based on both real and fictitious debts references? How does the system of GOMOPADie above-mentioned persons in Brief, as well as with the service GOMOPA cooperating, so-called “experts GOMOPA” Bloggers and all other professional and legal persons choose from all possible sources of information about large, rich companies and corporations coming in various domestic and international sectors of the economy. GOMOPA The service is particularly keen that those aussucht, the “in itself visible.” Those companies corporations and, therefore, against the relatively easy and without much effort himself, inconsistencies, etc. can be done in terms of the even crimes such as cheating and Erschwindeln Others can easily perform. It is well known that every company especially good at their presence and her name is inviolable. Each company will do everything according to their good presence also retain its credibility to be. But if the victim of GOMOPA and his “partner” and a large range of businesses, so it is possible to call such companies a quick, easy, and even considerably enriched. It appears at this point the question: Which clever criminals in the network and outside the network to me is success, it does not wish to benefit? The criminals in the network know that without business credibility there is no confidence that any business is essential. GOMOPA and all are cooperating with the security of all possible methods and measures mastered how to credibility and confidence of a company, a company, corporation (crime victims) in question. This moves just the attention of the user, so that the homepage of the GOMOPA http://www.gomopa.net in search engines like Google, Yahoo is easy to find. This, in turn, means nothing other than additional profits for the service GOMOPA because of its activity around a media discourse created wird. At first glance commonplace and easy victims of extortion, for example, can a public governmental body, which, based on the credibility of public works, such as a bank or a foreign bank financial institution. So it was with the foreign banks, international financial institution Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. the case. A simple and easy victims of illicit profits and material may include insurance companies, where – as it is from our search results, much to the criminal activities of the GOMOPA especially in the area of the Federal Republic of Germany, Switzerland and Austria was due. Among the known and identifiable victims is certainly German, Austrian and Swiss banks, insurance companies such as Allianz of Germany, German and Austrian companies such as HDI and DKV visible. This is what the service GOMOPA trust and what with the cooperating services, blogs nowadays practice is the so-called cyber-stalking, which rapidly spread in the network. The method is criminal at this point and others in the threat that the business of an enterprise (Ofer blackmail, threats and forcible ) fictitious, even non-existent information (lies, rumors, stories, statements, insults) on the net first then in other mass media. This is only used to a potential victim to move a considerable sum of money for the so-called “peace “the blackmailer available. The” quiet “here means the promise of access lock with respect to the fictitious publication of any information on the net and in all other mass media, the victims of extortion in extremely negative light showing. Such threats are, as already above the goal of companies – potential victims of cyber-stalking to do likewise, that they themselves “buy.” In short, GOMOPA and his peers, and cooperating with those services, and blogs, create a “virtual reality”, or otherwise said publishing fictitious information on potential victims of a crime. firms and corporations, against which threats and extortion by GOMOPA are not due, ie those who for so-called “peace” does not want to pay, to be victims of serious lies, insults, and Insinuationen other criminal misappropriations, the appearance and presence of a firm with certainty. One is a target of GOMOPA, namely as fast and as easy as it goes, money abzukassieren, and if a company refuses, and the “peace” do not buy wishes, it is unexpectedly and quickly become an object of extortion and defamation on the net. At this point the following question arises: How is it possible that the leader of the firm GOMOPA, Mr Klaus Maurischat, only in the Federal Republic of Germany on his account “23 court rulings, has for many years as an honest citizen to create, while other persons, firms, corporations criminal acts, offenses memorize, in addition to substantial sums of money could earn? This complex process can only be explained as follows: GOMOPA creates his appearance, his presence in the eyes of public opinion as an honest subject, against which pathological phenomena in the public and economic life einschreitet. GOMOPA and his partner (services, blogs) present themselves as followers of any Verbrechensart that promise so the fight against criminals in each virtual network ( especially against any cheaters, blackmailers). GOMOPA used in this respect a kind of “Merketingsvorhang” as a method of seduction, a result which is his true “face” and his true intentions than that of a fraudster and blackmail on money can hide. The true intentions of the GOMOPA, of working together GOMOPA Services and blogs were until today no doubt with success before the public opinion will remain hidden, especially thanks to the so-called “smoke curtain”, which reflects the fact that man himself as a “winner” of any abuse and any pathological appearance of the public and economic life in Aland German, Austria, Switzerland, the United States, Britain, Russia, Spain created. Next appears the GOMOPA forward by the person on which companies and corporations – the future victims of the crime that is – against the possibility of the release of extremely poor and the company concerned in a negative light visual information on the Internet and other mass media warns. The person from whom the speech is also informed that they are successful against such a procedure for a “fee” can be used. The GOMOPA is at this point up to the extortion of money for so-called “peace” to the company and corporation (the victim of a crime) around. Most of the companies concerned to such threats did not respond, because it’s everyday life and their agenda. It finally barely missing on the web of blackmail and outside of the medium. Normally so seldom so-called “understanding”, while on the one hand, the crime victim, on the other hand, the GOMOPA occurs. It is understandable that the price for such an “understanding” means the provision of the requested funds would GOMOPA. The financial blackmail in this stage is rarely enforced. The situation changes little, however, if the firms and corporations (crime victims) find that the threat was fulfilled. In Brief will appear on the homepage http://www.gomopa.net numerous newspaper articles, reports and bogus pseudo market analysis, both by GOMOPA as well as so-called “independent experts” and the company will be represented, with formal or fictitious GOMOPA together. Information published here, correspond to the contents of a threat and make the operations of firms and corporations in an extremely negative light dar. There is no doubt that such actions and methods only to harm the good name and good presence of these firms and corporations prerogatives. The activity of GOMOPA is certainly not exhausted. GOMOPA disseminated (published accommodates) the above information in the network by the credible, and popular opinion-operated services. Moreover, GOMOPA threatens the companies and corporations (its victims), that “from the finger-drawn” information not only on the network, but also on television and on radio and in the press landscape erscheinen.Wie the experience and expertise of the former Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. show that the services are usually not aware that they are for the purpose of a criminal action by the GOMOPA used. They agree with the corresponding fictitious publications, reports and analysis on what specifically GOMOPA through and through “independent” experts are prepared. It also states that the services, and blogs such cooperation with the GOMOPA approval, although they know that the information transmitted by GOMOPA are fictitious and the credibility of companies and corporations affect. They take so aware of the criminal procedure part. The explanation of this situation is quite simple. GOMOPA pays namely the services, and blogs related remuneration that the publication of false information on the companies and corporations (crime victims) agree. Some services, and blogs seem to know nothing about it to have that on their pages available information “fictitious” and “pulled out of the fingers are. Are you looking for in this way their conduct to justify, because they want the legal consequences of participating in the abuse of the good name and appearance of a company or corporation to escape. The activity system of GOMOPA of collaborating services and blogs was also the example of Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. tested. Beginning in October 2008 was one of the workers of Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. a message from an anonymous sender, in the near future – first on the Internet, then on television, radio and in the German press – information published by the functioning and activities of Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. in an extremely negative light show. The employee of Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. was then informed that these reports / news undoubtedly significantly the appearance and the reputation of the firm Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. affect. The place mentioned in this “conversation partner” has the workers of Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. informed that the possibility of the embarrassing situation to be avoided by Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. to the person shown by the account the sum of 100,000.00 EUR transfers. As later revealed, however, was Mr. Klaus Mauri Chat – this anonymous interlocutor – “brain” and “Leader of the GOMOPA”. The investigations have been employed by the Federal Judicial Police (tracking and identifying the body at the federal level) during the investigation for the payment of blackmail, fraud and threats because of what Mr Mauri chatting and his staff were practiced, and for participation by other (head of Internet services and moderators of blogs) on this process. These crimes have been committed to loss of many professional and judicial persons, including the Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. The victims of this crime in Germany, Austria, Switzerland, Spain, Portugal, Great Britain, the USA and Canada visible. At this moment appeared the following question: What was the reaction of Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. to the demands from GOMOPA? Corresponded to the response to the expectations of GOMOPA? Has the Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. the required sum of EUR 100,000.00 paid? Side of Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. There was absolutely no reaction to the extortion attempt by GOMOPA. At the end of August 2008 on the Service http://www.gompa.net numerous articles / reports published by the activities of Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. in a very negative light have represented. Once the information contained on http://www.gomopa.net detail and were fully analyzed, it is that they are not even the truth at one point and potential and existing customers of Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. in relation to the financial institution from this discontinued business activities is misleading. Following the criminal Handlugen of GOMOPA and its cooperating services, and blogs on the network, the Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. measurable and significant business losses. The Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. has primarily an important group of potential customers lost. But what it showed as important, the existing customers of Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. little away. Those customers have used our services and continue to use the still. In view of the existing collaboration with the Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.., Which will in turn be no objections. GOMOPA has such a course of events accurately predicted, which aims significant and measurable business by Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. losses were suffered. The course of events, the service GOMOPA certainly pleased. GOMOPA has to expect that the position of Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. declines and the financial institution, the required sum (100.000,00 EUR) provides. Over time, as the whole procedure in the network was becoming more popular, tried GOMOPA still four times to the Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. Contacts, each time by adjusting these criminal “Kompanie” has promised, although it every time his financial demands heraufsetzte. The last of the set of “company” against Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. ratio was even planned EUR 5,000,000.00 (in words: EURO fünfmilionen). The Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. could but before the ever-increasing demands from the Service GOMOPA claim. In October 2008 met the management of Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. Decision on the notification of the INTERPOL International Police and the appropriate law enforcement institutions of the FRG (the police and the prosecutor) about the existing situation. In the meantime, reported at the Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. numerous companies and corporations, and even professional person such as doctors, judges, priests, actors and other people from different countries of the world, the extortion of GOMOPA relented and the required amounts of money it had. These people already gave statements that they have done so, so they finally just “be in peace” and unnecessary problems, difficulties, and a reasonable conclusion hardly avoid them. The victims of this criminal action, the Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. using different amounts of money which were requested, informed. In one case, there were relatively small (a few thousand EURO), in another case it has to deliver significant amounts (around few million EURO). Additionally turned to Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. Companies which have not yet GOMOPA the “fee” on out and have already considered whether they should do or not. These firms anticipated by Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. a clear opinion as well as a practical professional advice on how to be in such a situation should behave and how they can avoid debt. The Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. has invariably victims of all crimes, which are at our company have made a cooperation proposed. The top task is to this cooperation, jointly determined and effective measures against GOMOPA against other services in the network, and against all Bloggers to meet in the here described with international criminal procedure GOMOPA leaders to participate. All these companies were known as the Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. proposed “crusade” against GOMOPA, his partner. At our request to notify all participating companies the INTERPOL International Police and their pursuit of domestic institutions, including the competent public prosecutor and the police authorities about the existing situation. In view of the fact that the criminal act of GOMOPA be extended over many states and that the number of the Federal Republic of Germany because the ads reimbursed by GOMOPA, Internet Services and Bloggers crimes, grew up fast – which no doubt influenced by a far-reaching impact of criminal of GOMOPA testifies – International Business, the Police INTERPOL Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. before that its representatives in Berlin with representatives from GOMOPA true to the “payment arrangements and transfer the sum of EUR 5,000,000.00 to discuss. This step meant a well thought-out and by the Federal Criminal Police organized the event to carry out aimed at the arrest of international criminals GOMOPA acting was. The coordinated steps and measures of Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. Damaged and others, led by the International Economic Police INTERPOL, the Federal Criminal Police Office and the Prosecutor of the Federal Republic of Germany for education, training and implementation of the above-described case contributed. In November 2008, the event in Berlin prepared for the apprehension and arrest of the representative of the GOMOPA, after the arrest of Mr. Klaus Mauri chat – as the main leaders and leaders of international criminal group GOMOPA recalled. The arrest and notified the Federal Criminal Police showed both the current whereabouts of Mr. Klaus Mauri chat. “Brain” and the founder of this international criminal group GOMOPA, Mr Klaus Mauri chat on the same day was also arrested and imprisoned on time, will soon put in charge state, the responsibility for their own crimes and those of the forum, before a competent GOMOPA Federal wear. The Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. undertook all possible steps to ensure that Mr. Klaus Mauri chatting on the dock of the competent court of the United Kingdom of Great Britain appears. Among the damaged work and justice people from United Kingdom, along with the Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. There are many victims of GOMOPA: The beginning of the arrests with such a scale means for the German judiciary and a major breakthrough point. It is worth noting that the prosecution bodies of the Federal Republic, up to this stage of the long-standing criminal activity of Mr. Klaus Mauri chatting and his staff were powerless. Prolonged impunity of the criminal actions of Mr. Klaus Mauri chat, for years the “first violin” in GOMOPA played, is to end gegangen.An this point another question arises: how is it so go on? The arrest of Mr. Klaus chat Mauri is a critical moment, in other words a “turn around 180 degrees” for him personally. But it also means the beginning of the end “for its employees, for Internet Services, Bloggers, with GOMOPA so happy and had worked together without contradiction. There is no doubt that the cause of Mr Klaus Mauri chat at the top of the “iceberg” is. The above-mentioned turning point on this issue will be further arrests and detentions of members GOMOPA bring with them, and all persons from all areas involved in this transnational criminal actions have taken part. For information (reports by the end of December 2008), which of Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. available, the result that the next arrests currently prepared to be associated with the Services GOMOPA cooperating persons. This is to people outside Germany – from where Mr Klaus Mauri chat coming – refer. The details may be at this point in terms of legal and course of the prosecution bodies of the BRG and the Interpol-led investigation can not be betrayed. The Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. currently can only illustrate information from the investigation led the public to the criminal liability not to have this moment wird.In so intense preparations for the arrest of a number of persons outside the Federal Republic of Germany. This applies particularly to countries such as the following: – Russia-Ukraine – Poland – Spain – Mexico – Portugal – Brazil – the United States of America – Canada – UK – Ireland – Australia – New Zealand – India. All professional and judicial persons, regardless of the country in which they accompany the Office, or its citizens, and until now, consciously or unconsciously with the Forum GOMOPA together, or continue to work together to arouse the suspicion of the INTERPOL International Police. This works with the police criminal investigation department in each country, to the above persons first identify and then to legally pursue them. Information about this topic, as well as on the beginning and end of the activity of the GOMOPA can be at the following addresses on the Web at: http://gomopaabzocker.wordpress.com/ – http://www.nepper-schlepper-bauernfaenger.com – http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qNpzAu-QMuE – http://www.korte.de/alexander/2006/01/gomopa-finanforum-kritik.html- http://evelux.de/gomopa-sam-240/- http://blog.deobald.org/archive/2007/07/01/betrugsvorwurf-gomopa-spam/ 2. Dubai KLP Group Emirates – United Arab Emirates. As head of the company is Mr Martin Kraeter, not only as the “brain” of the whole company, but also as a longstanding friend of Mr Klaus Mauri Chat (GOMOPA-wire) acts. This company wants to hide and not even officially exist, that they as a strategic partner of the GOMOPA in the area of the Middle East, according to the territory of the Persian coast operates. Official activities of the company KLP Group Emirates includes among others the following areas: financial advisory services from the offshore area (Management Services – Facilitators – OffshoreConsultants, International Tax & Legal Consultants – Fiduciaries). In the sphere of activities of the Company will include the creation of companies and enterprises in the so-called “tax havens” to the tax liability to the company activity entfliehen.Inoffizielle KLP Group Emirates includes cooperation with the Service GOMOPA in the field of “Gelwäsche”. The monies are a result of criminal activity by GOMOPA generated by advanced professional and judicial persons soon throughout the world and legalized. The illegality based on the activity of the company KLP Group Emirates, as well as the cooperation with the Services GOMOPA attracted attention even when the prosecution organs of the United Kingdom of Great Britain, especially in Scotland Yard, which on this issue an intensive investigation has begun, which is in the ” development phase is located. It must be noted that all professional and judicial persons, but especially the clients of the company KLP Group Emirates, with the company KLP Group Emirates have cooperated in the past and still do, under the “Lupp” of Scotland Yard to be .3. Russlanda) The Company E-XECUTIVE by the Lord led Novosartow Vilen. On the homepage of the Company contained information comes directly from the company GOMOPA. The company e XECUTIVE leads the close cooperation not only with GOMOPA, but also with another on the Russian territory under the name of OOO UK broker functioning company. The company e XECUTIVE in connection with the company OOO UK broker is a member of a criminal group led by GOMOPA. The company e XECUTIVE GOMOPA representing interests in Russia and Central-Eastern Europe. Unofficially, the company employs E XECUTIVE-especially with the search for potential “victims” of the Erschwindelns, blackmail and forcing the funds for GOMOPA companies and corporations from the territory of Russia, Ukraine, and from all countries in Central Eastern Europe. Officially, the company e XECUTIVE one to the forum GOMOPA similar industrial activity. b) OOO “UK broker.” Head of the firm is Mr. Pavel Kokarev. This company is not concealed, that they are consistent with the Forum GOMOPA cooperates. The company OOO UK broker represents GOMOPA in Central Eastern Europe, including Russia. You shall be officially transferred to this area the GOMOPA similar activity, but unofficially it is to search for potential “victims” of racketeering, fraud and Erschwindelns for GOMOPA employed. The company has remained until now spared from any punishment, it could with “eternal impunity” because of a poorly developed, corrupt legal system in Russia expected. The situation may change after Mr. Klaus Mauri Chat arrested in Berlin and was arrested. This constant offenders, the “on his account” a set of legally enforceable judgments has, until now his freedom has unlimited recover, the do not know quite what it means to be arrested, begins gradually, according to our available information to finally “to bear witness.” This is understandable when one considers the threat of a penalty he considered. This delinquent shows growing interest in cooperation with the German tracking and identifying bodies. So there is a chance that other people he unveiled to the public by providing for reduction of prison sentence counts. It is also the only question of time INTERPOL, in cooperation with the Russian Service (FSB) of the Company OOO UK broker “at the door knocking”, which by Mr. Pavle Kokarev and represented. The company OOO UK broker has a virtual office in REGUS building in Moscow, is not even a person, forming a typical one-person company, which all business “crimes” may be the name of it, with no civil liability to pay. The Lord Pavel Kokarev seems to have forgotten or do not have sufficient knowledge about its possible responsibility fier to participate in the international crimes under the direction of Gomopa.
Become a Patron!
True Information is the most valuable resource and we ask you to give back.
“Worse than the Gestapo.” —Simon Wiesenthal, Nazi hunter said about the notorious “Stasi”.
Less than a month after German demonstrators began to tear down the Berlin Wall on November 9, 1989, irate East German citizens stormed the Leipzig district office of the Ministry for State Security (MfS)—the Stasi, as it was more commonly called. Not a shot was fired, and there was no evidence of “street justice” as Stasi officers surrendered meekly and were peacefully led away. The following month, on January 15, hundreds of citizens sacked Stasi headquarters in Berlin. Again there was no bloodshed. The last bit of unfinished business was accomplished on May 31 when the Stasi radioed its agents in West Germany to fold their tents and come home.
The intelligence department of the Nationale Volksarmee (NVA), the People’s Army, had done the same almost a week earlier, but with what its members thought was better style. In-stead of sending the five-digit code groups that it had used for decades to message its spies in West Germany, the army group broadcast a male choir singing a children’s ditty about a duck swimming on a lake. There was no doubt that the singing spymasters had been drowning their sorrow over losing the Cold War in schnapps. The giggling, word-slurring songsters repeated the refrain three times: “Dunk your little head in the water and lift your little tail.” This was the signal to agents under deep cover that it was time to come home.
With extraordinary speed and political resolve, the divided nation was reunified a year later. The collapse of the despotic regime was total. It was a euphoric time for Germans, but reunification also produced a new national dilemma. Nazi war crimes were still being tried in West Germany, forty-six years after World War II. Suddenly the German government was faced with demands that the communist officials who had ordered, executed, and abetted crimes against their own people—crimes that were as brutal as those perpetrated by their Nazi predecessors—also be prosecuted.
The people of the former Deutsche Demokratische Republik (DDR), the German Democratic Republic, as the state had called itself for forty years, were clamoring for instant revenge. Their wrath was directed primarily against the country’s communist rulers—the upper echelon of the Sozialistische Einheitspartei (SED), the Socialist Unity Party. The tens of thousands of second-echelon party functionaries who had enriched themselves at the expense of their cocitizens were also prime targets for retribution.
Particularly singled out were the former members of the Stasi, the East German secret police, who previously had considered themselves the “shield and sword” of the party. When the regime collapsed, the Stasi had 102,000 full-time officers and noncommissioned personnel on its rolls, including 11,000 members of the ministry’s own special guards regiment. Between 1950 and 1989, a total of 274,000 persons served in the Stasi.
The people’s ire was running equally strong against the regular Stasi informers, the inoffizielle Mitarbeiter (IMs). By 1995, 174,000 had been identified as IMs, or 2.5 percent of the total population between the ages of 18 and 60. Researchers were aghast when they found that about 10,000 IMs, or roughly 6 percent of the total, had not yet reached the age of 18. Since many records were destroyed, the exact number of IMs probably will never be determined; but 500,000 was cited as a realistic figure. Former Colonel Rainer Wiegand, who served in the Stasi counterintelligence directorate, estimated that the figure could go as high as 2 million, if occasional stool pigeons were included.
“The Stasi was much, much worse than the Gestapo, if you consider only the oppression of its own people,” according to Simon Wiesenthal of Vienna, Austria, who has been hunting Nazi criminals for half a century. “The Gestapo had 40,000 officials watching a country of 80 million, while the Stasi employed 102,000 to control only 17 million.” One might add that the Nazi terror lasted only twelve years, whereas the Stasi had four decades in which to perfect its machinery of oppression, espionage, and international terrorism and subversion.
To ensure that the people would become and remain submissive, East German communist leaders saturated their realm with more spies than had any other totalitarian government in recent history. The Soviet Union’s KGB employed about 480,000 full-time agents to oversee a nation of 280 million, which means there was one agent per 5,830 citizens. Using Wiesenthal’s figures for the Nazi Gestapo, there was one officer for 2,000 people. The ratio for the Stasi was one secret policeman per 166 East Germans. When the regular informers are added, these ratios become much higher: In the Stasi’s case, there would have been at least one spy watching every 66 citizens! When one adds in the estimated numbers of part-time snoops, the result is nothing short of monstrous: one informer per 6.5 citizens. It would not have been unreasonable to assume that at least one Stasi informer was present in any party of ten or twelve dinner guests.
THE STASI OCTOPUS
Like a giant octopus, the Stasi’s tentacles probed every aspect of life. Full-time officers were posted to all major industrial plants. Without exception, one tenant in every apartment build-ing was designated as a watchdog reporting to an area representative of the Volkspolizei (Vopo), the People’s Police. In turn, the police officer was the Stasi’s man. If a relative or friend came to stay overnight, it was reported. Schools, universities, and hospitals were infiltrated from top to bottom. German academe was shocked to learn that Heinrich Fink, professor of theology and vice chancellor at East Berlin’s Humboldt University, had been a Stasi informer since 1968. After Fink’s Stasi connections came to light, he was summarily fired. Doctors, lawyers, journalists, writers, actors, and sports figures were co-opted by Stasi officers, as were waiters and hotel personnel. Tapping about 100,000 telephone lines in West Germany and West Berlin around the clock was the job of 2,000 officers.
Stasi officers knew no limits and had no shame when it came to “protecting the party and the state.” Churchmen, including high officials of both Protestant and Catholic denomina-tions, were recruited en masse as secret informers. Their offices and confessionals were infested with eavesdropping devices. Even the director of Leipzig’s famous Thomas Church choir, Hans-Joachim Rotch, was forced to resign when he was unmasked as a Spitzel, the people’s pejorative for a Stasi informant.
Absolutely nothing was sacred to the secret police. Tiny holes were bored in apartment and hotel room walls through which Stasi agents filmed their “suspects” with special video cam-eras. Even bathrooms were penetrated by the communist voyeurs.8 Like the Nazi Gestapo, the Stasi was the sinister side of deutsche Gründlichkeit (German thoroughness).
After the Berlin wall came down, the victims of the DDR regime demanded immediate retribution. Ironically, their demands were countered by their fellow Germans in the West who, living in freedom, had diligently built einen demokratischen Rechtsstaat, a democratic state governed by the rule of law. The challenge of protecting the rights of both the victims and the accused was immense, given the emotions surrounding the issue. Government leaders and democratic politicians recognized that there could be no “quick fix” of communist injustices without jeopardizing the entire system of democratic jurisprudence. Moving too rapidly merely to satisfy the popular thirst for revenge might well have resulted in acquittals or mistrials. Intricate jurisdictional questions needed to be resolved with both alacrity and meticulousness. No German government could afford to allow a perpetrator to go free because of a judicial error. The political fallout from any such occurrence, especially in the East, could prove fatal to whatever political party occupied the chancellor’s office in Bonn at the time.
Politicians and legal scholars of the “old federal states,” or West Germany, counseled patience, pointing out that even the prosecution of Nazi criminals had not yet been completed. Before unification, Germans would speak of Vergangenheitsbewältigung (“coming to grips with the past”) when they discussed dealing with Nazi crimes. In the reunited Germany, this word came to imply the communist past as well. The two were considered comparable especially in the area of human rights violations. Dealing with major Nazi crimes, however, was far less complicated for the Germans: Adolf Hitler and his Gestapo and Schutzstaffel (SS) chief, Heinrich Himmler, killed themselves, as did Luftwaffe chief and Vice Chancellor Hermann Göring, who also had been the first chief of the Gestapo. The victorious Allies prosecuted the rest of the top leadership at the International War Crimes Tribunal in Nürnberg. Twelve were hanged, three received life terms, four were sentenced to lesser terms of imprisonment (up to twenty years), and three were acquitted.
The cases of communist judges and prosecutors accused of Rechtsbeugung (perversion of justice) are more problematic. According to Franco Werkenthin, a Berlin legal expert charged with analyzing communist crimes for the German parliament, those sitting in judgment of many of the accused face a difficult task because of the general failure of German justice after World War II. Not a single judge or prosecutor who served the Nazi regime was brought to account for having perverted justice—even those who had handed down death sentences for infringements that in a democracy would have been considered relatively minor offenses. Werkenthin called this phenomenon die Jauche der Justiz, the cesspool of justice.
Of course, the crimes committed by the communists were not nearly as heinous as the Nazis’ extermination of the Jews, or the mass murders in Nazi-occupied territories. However, the communists’ brutal oppression of the nation by means including murder alongside legal execution put the SED leadership on a par with Hitler’s gang. In that sense, Walter Ulbricht or Erich Honecker (Ulbricht’s successor as the party’s secretary-general and head of state) and secret police chief Erich Mielke can justifiably be compared to Hitler and Himmler, respectively.
Arrest warrants were issued for Honecker and Mielke. The Soviet government engineered Honecker’s escape to Moscow, where he became the ward of Soviet President Mikhail S. Gor-bachev. When the Soviet Union crumbled, the new Russian President Boris Yeltsin expelled Honecker. He was arrested on his return to Germany, but a court decided against a trial when he was diagnosed with liver cancer. Honecker flew to Chile with his wife Margot to live with their daughter, a Chilean citizen by marriage. His exile was short, and he died in 1994. Mielke was not so fortunate: His KGB friends turned their backs on him. He was tried in Germany for the 1931 murder of two police officers, found guilty, and sentenced to six years in prison. Other charges, including manslaughter, were dismissed because of his advanced age and poor health.
Three other members of the twenty-one-member ruling Politburo also have been tried. Former Defense Minister Heinz Kessler was convicted of manslaughter in connection with the order to kill people who were trying to escape to the West. He received a seven-and-a-half-year term. Two others, members of the Central Committee and the National Defense Council, were tried with Kessler and sentenced to seven and a half years and five years, respectively. Politburo member Harry Tisch, who was also head of the communist trade union, was found guilty of embezzlement and served eighteen months. Six others, including Egon Krenz (Honecker’s successor as party chief), were charged with manslaughter. Krenz was found guilty, and on August 25, 1997, was sentenced to six and a half years in prison.
However, eight years after reunification, many of the 165 members of the Central Committee have not yet been put under investigation. In 1945, Nazis holding comparable or lesser positions were subject to automatic arrest by the Allies. They spent months or even years in camps while their cases were adjudicated. Moreover, the Nürnberg Tribunal branded the Reich and its Corps of Political Leaders, SS, Security Service (SD), Secret State Police (Gestapo), SA (Storm Troopers), and Armed Forces High Command criminal organizations. Similarly sweeping actions against communist leaders and functionaries such as Stasi officers were never contemplated, even though tens of thousands of political trials and human rights abuses have been documented. After the East German regime fell, German judicial authorities scrupulously avoided the appearance of waging witch-hunts or using the law as a weapon of vengeance. Prosecutors and judges made great efforts to be fair, often suspending legal action while requesting rulings from the supreme court on possible constitutional conflicts.
The victims of oppression clamored for revenge and demanded speedy prosecution of the erstwhile tyrants. They had little patience for a judicial system that was handicapped by a lack of unblemished and experienced criminal investigators, prosecutors, and judges. Despite these handicaps, the Berlin Central Police Investigations Group for Government Criminality, mindful that the statute of limitations for most communist crimes would expire at the end of 1999, made significant progress under its director Manfred Kittlaus, the able former director of the West Berlin state police. Kittlaus’s major task in 1998 was to investigate wrongful deaths, including 73 murders, 30 attempted murders, 583 cases of manslaughter, 2,938 instances of attempted manslaughter, and 425 other suspicious deaths. Of the 73 murders, 22 were classified as contract murders.
One of those tried and convicted for attempted contract murder was former Stasi collaborator Peter Haak, who was sentenced to six and a half years in prison. The fifty-two-year-old Haak took part in the Stasi’s 1981 Operation Scorpion, which was designed to pursue people who helped East Germans escape to the West. Proceedings against former General Gerhard Neiber, whose Stasi directorate was responsible for preventing escapes and for wreaking vengeance, were still pending in 1998.
Peter Haak’s murder plot was hatched after he befriended Wolfgang Welsch and his family. Welsch was a thorn in the side of the Stasi because of his success in smuggling people out of the DDR. Haak joined Welsch and the latter’s wife and seven-year-old daughter on a vacation in Israel, where he mixed a gram of thallium, a highly poisonous metallic chemical element used in rat poison, into the hamburgers he was preparing for a meal. Welsch’s wife and daughter vomited immediately after ingesting the poison and recovered quickly. Welsch suffered severe aftereffects, but eventually recovered: He had consumed a large amount of beer with the meal, and an expert testified that the alcohol had probably flushed the poison from his system.
Berlin Prosecutor General Christoph Schäfgen revealed that after the DDR’s demise 15,200 investigations had been launched, of which more than 9,000 were still active at the beginning of 1995. Indictments were handed down in 153 cases, and 73 perpetrators were convicted. Among those convicted were the aforementioned Politburo members as well as a number of border guards who had killed people who were trying to escape to the West.
Despite widespread misgivings about the judicial failures in connection with some Nazi crimes, a number of judges and prosecutors were convicted and jailed for up to three years for perversion of justice. In collusion with the Stasi, they had requested or handed down more severe sentences in political cases so that the state could collect greater amounts when the “convicts” were ransomed by the West German government. {The amount of ransom paid was governed by the time a prisoner had been sentenced to serve.)
The enormity of the task facing judicial authorities in reunified Germany becomes starkly evident when one examines the actions they have taken in all five former East German prov-inces and in East Berlin. From the end of 1990 to July 1996, 52,050 probes were launched into charges of murder, attempted murder, manslaughter, kidnapping, election fraud, and per-version of justice. A total of 29,557 investigations were halted for various reasons including death, severe illness, old age, or insufficient evidence. In those five and a half years, there were only 139 convictions.
The problem is even more staggering when cases of espionage are included. Between 1990 and 1996, the office of the federal prosecutor general launched 6,641 probes, of which 2,431 were terminated before trial—most due to the statute of limitations. Of 175 indictments on charges of espionage, 95 resulted in convictions. In addition to the cases handled at the federal level, the prosecutor general referred 3,926 investigations to state authorities, who terminated 3,344 without trial. State courts conducted 356 trials, resulting in 248 convictions. Because the statute of limitations for espionage is five years, the prosecutor general’s office told me in 1997 it was unlikely that more espionage trials would be conducted.
It is important to emphasize the difference between the statute’s application to so-called government crimes committed in East Germany before the collapse and to crimes, such as es-pionage, committed in West Germany. The Unification Treaty specifically permits the belated prosecution of individuals who committed acts that were punishable under the East German criminal code and who due to official connivance were not prosecuted earlier. There is no statute of limitations for murder. For most other crimes the limit is five years; however, due to the obstacles created by previous government connivance, the German parliament in 1993 doubled this time limit for prosecution of the more serious crimes. At the same time, the par-liament decreed that all cases must be adjudicated by the end of 2002. For less serious offenses, the statute would have run out on December 31, 1997, but the parliament extended it to 2000.
A number of politicians, jurists, and liberal journalists pleaded for a general amnesty for crimes committed by former DDR leaders and Communist Party functionaries. A former West German supreme court judge, Ernst Mahrenholz, said the “sharp sword of justice prevents reconciliation.” Schäfgen, the Berlin prosecutor general, had this answer for the former high court judge and other amnesty advocates:
I cannot agree. We are raising no special, sharp sword against East Germans. We must pursue state-sponsored injustice in exactly the same manner as we do when a thief steals or when one human being kills another. If one wants to change that, then we would have to do away with the entire criminal justice system, because punishment always hurts. We are not criminalizing an entire people but only an ever shrinking, small portion.
German Foreign Minister Klaus Kinkel, who was West Germany’s minister of justice when the nation was unified, said this at a session of parliament in September 1991: “We must punish the perpetrators. This is not a matter of a victor’s justice. We owe it to the ideal of justice and to the victims. All of those who ordered injustices and those who executed the orders must be punished; the top men of the SED as well as the ones who shot [people] at the wall.” Aware that the feelings against communists were running high among their victims, Kinkel pointed to past revolutions after which the representatives of the old system were collectively liquidated. In the same speech before parliament, he said:
Such methods are alien to a state ruled by law. Violence and vengeance are incompatible with the law in any case. At the same time, we cannot tolerate that the problems are swept under the rug as a way of dealing with a horrible past, because the results will later be disastrous for society. We Germans know from our own experience where this leads. Jewish philosophy formulates it in this way: “The secret of redemption is called remembering.”
Defense attorneys for communist officials have maintained that the difficulty lies in the fact that hundreds of thousands of political opponents were tried under laws of the DDR. Although these laws were designed to smother political dissent and grossly violated basic human rights and democratic norms, they were nonetheless laws promulgated by a sovereign state. How could one justly try individual Stasi officers, prosecutors, and judges who had simply been fulfilling their legal responsibility to pursue and punish violators of the law?
Opinions varied widely on whether and how the Stasi and other perpetrators of state-sponsored crimes should be tried. Did the laws of the DDR, as they existed before reunification, still apply in the east? Or was the criminal code of the western part of the country the proper instrument of justice in reunified Germany? However, these questions were moot: As Rupert Scholz, professor of law at the University of Munich and a Christian Democratic member of parliament, pointed out, the Unification Treaty specifies that the penal code of the DDR and not that of the Federal Republic of Germany (FRG) shall be applied to offenses committed in East Germany. Scholz’s view was upheld by the Bundesverfassungsgericht, the supreme court. Most offenses committed by party functionaries and Stasi officers—murder, kidnapping, torture, illegal wiretapping, mail robbery, and fraud—were subject to prosecution in reunified Germany under the DDR’s penal code. But this would not satisfy the tens of thousands of citizens who had been sent to prison under East German laws covering purely political offenses for which there was no West German equivalent.
Nevertheless, said Scholz, judicial authorities were by no means hamstrung, because West Germany had never recognized the East German state according to international law. “We have always said that we are one nation; that the division of Germany led neither to full recognition under international law nor, concomitantly, to a recognition of the legal system of the DDR,” Scholz said. Accordingly, West German courts have consistently maintained that West German law protects all Germans equally, including those living in the East. Therefore, no matter where the crimes were committed, whether in the East or the West, all Germans have always been subject to West German laws. Applying this logic, East German border guards who had either killed or wounded persons trying to escape to the West could be tried under the jurisdiction of West Germany.
The “one nation” principle was not upheld by the German supreme court. Prior to the court’s decision, however, Colonel General Markus Wolf, chief of the Stasi’s foreign espionage directorate, and some of his officers who personally controlled agents from East Berlin had been tried for treason and convicted. Wolf had been sentenced to six years in prison. The su-preme court ruling overturned that verdict and those imposed on Wolf’s cohorts, even though they had obtained the most closely held West German secrets and handed them over to the KGB. The maximum penalty for Landesverrat, or treason, is life imprisonment. In vacating Wolf’s sentence, the court said he could not be convicted because he operated only from East German territory and under East German law.
However, Wolf was reindicted on charges of kidnapping and causing bodily harm, crimes also punishable under East German law. The former Stasi three-star general, on March 24, 1955, had approved in writing a plan to kidnap a woman who worked for the U.S. mission in West Berlin. The woman and her mother were tricked by a Stasi agent whom the woman had been teaching English, and voluntarily got into his car. He drove them into the Soviet sector of the divided city, where they were seized by Stasi officers. The woman was subjected to psychological torture and threatened with imprisonment unless she signed an agreement to spy for the Stasi. She agreed. On her return to the American sector, however, the woman reported the incident to security officials. Wolf had committed a felony punishable by up to fifteen years’ imprisonment in West Germany. He was found guilty in March 1977 and sentenced to two years’ probation.
Those who have challenged the application of the statute of limitations to communist crimes, especially to the executions of citizens fleeing to the West, have drawn parallels to the notorious executive orders of Adolf Hitler. Hitler issued orders mandating the summary execution of Soviet Army political commissars upon their capture and initiating the extermination of Jews. An early postwar judicial decision held that these orders were equivalent to law. When that law was declared illegal and retroactively repealed by the West German Bundestag, the statute of limitations was suspended—that is, it never took effect. Many of those convicted in subsequent trials of carrying out the Führer’s orders were executed by the Allies. The German supreme court has ruled the same way as the Bundestag on the order to shoot people trying to escape to West Germany, making the statute of limitations inapplicable to such cases. The ruling made possible the trial of members of the National Defense Council who took part in formulating or promulgating the order. A number of border guards who had shot would-be escapees also have been tried and convicted.
Chief Prosecutor Heiner Sauer, former head of the West German Central Registration Office for Political Crimes, was particularly concerned with the border shootings. His office, located in Salzgitter, West Germany, was established in 1961 as a direct consequence of the Berlin Wall, which was erected on August 13 of that year. Willy Brandt, at the time the city’s mayor (later federal chancellor) had decided that crimes committed by East German border guards should be recorded. At his behest, a central registry of all shootings and other serious border incidents was instituted. Between August 13, 1961 and the opening of the borders on November 9, 1989, 186 border killings were registered. But when the Stasi archives were opened, investigators found that at least 825 people had paid with their lives for trying to escape to the West. This figure was reported to the court that was trying former members of the National Defense Council. In addition to these border incidents, the registry also had recorded a number of similar political offenses committed in the interior of the DDR: By fall 1991, Sauer’s office had registered 4,444 cases of actual or attempted killings and about 40,000 sentences handed down by DDR courts for “political offenses.”
During the early years of Sauer’s operation, the details of political prosecutions became known only when victims were ransomed by West Germany or were expelled. Between 1963 and 1989, West Germany paid DM5 billion (nearly US$3 billion) to the communist regime for the release of 34,000 political prisoners. The price per head varied according to the importance of the person or the length of the sentence. In some cases the ransom amounted to more than US$56,000. The highest sum ever paid to the East Germans appears to have been DM450,000 (US$264,705 using an exchange rate of US$1.70 to the mark). The ransom “object” in this case was Count Benedikt von Hoensbroech. A student in his early twenties, von Hoensbroech was attending a West Berlin university when the wall went up. He was caught by the Stasi while trying to help people escape and was sentenced to ten years at hard labor. The case at-tracted international attention because his family was related to Queen Fabiola of Belgium, who interceded with the East Germans. Smelling money, the East German government first demanded the equivalent of more than US$1 million from the young man’s father as ransom. In the end, the parties settled on the figure of DM450,000, of which the West German gov-ernment paid DM40,000 (about $23,529). Such ransom operations were fully controlled by the Stasi.
Political prisoners released in the DDR could not be registered by the West Germans because their cases remained secret. The victims were admonished to keep quiet or face another prison term. Nonetheless, in the first year after reunification, Sauer’s office added another 20,000 documented cases, for a total of 60,000. Sauer said he believed the final figure of all political prosecutions would be somewhere around 300,000. In every case, the Stasi was involved either in the initial arrest or in pretrial interrogations during which “confessions” were usually extracted by physical or psychological torture, particularly between the mid-1940s and the mid-1960s.
Until 1987, the DDR imposed the death penalty for a number of capital crimes, including murder, espionage, and economic offenses. But after the mid-1950s, nearly all death sentences were kept quiet and executions were carried out in the strictest secrecy, initially by guillotine and in later years by a single pistol shot to the neck. In most instances, the relatives of those killed were not informed either of the sentence or of the execution. The corpses were cremated and the ashes buried secretly, sometimes at construction sites. In reporting about one executioner who shot more than twenty persons to death, the Berlin newspaper Bildzeitung said that a total of 170 civilians had been executed in East Germany. However, Franco Werkenthin, the Berlin official investigating DDR crimes, said he had documented at least three hundred executions. He declined to say how many were for political offenses, because he had not yet submitted his report to parliament. “But it was substantial,” he told me. The true number of executions may never be known because no complete record of death sentences meted out by civil courts could be found. Other death sentences were handed down by military courts, and many records of those are also missing. In addition, German historian Günther Buch believes that about two hundred members of the Stasi itself were executed for various crimes, including attempts to escape to the West.
SAFEGUARDING HUMAN DIGNITY?
The preamble to the East German criminal code stated that the purpose of the code was to “safeguard the dignity of humankind, its freedom and rights under the aegis of the criminal code of the socialist state,” and that “a person can be prosecuted under the criminal code only in strictest concurrence with the law.” However, many of the codified offenses for which East German citizens were prosecuted and imprisoned were unique to totalitarian regimes, both fascist and communist.
Moreover, certain sections of the code, such as those on “Treasonable Relaying of Information” and “Treasonable Agent Activity,” were perversely applied, landing countless East Germans in maximum security penitentiaries. The victims of this perversion of justice usually were persons who had requested legal exit permits from the DDR authorities and had been turned down. In many cases, their “crime” was having contacted a Western consulate to inquire about immigration procedures. Sentences of up to two and a half years’ hard labor were not unusual as punishment for such inquiries.
Engaging in “propaganda hostile to the state” was another punishable offense. In one such case, a young man was arrested and prosecuted for saying that it was not necessary to station tanks at the border and for referring to border fortifications as “nonsense.” During his trial, he “admitted” to owning a television set on which he watched West German programs and later told friends what he saw. One of those “friends” had denounced him to the Stasi. The judge considered the accused’s actions especially egregious and sentenced him to a year and a half at hard labor.
Ironically, another part of this section of the criminal code decreed that “glorifying militarism” also was a punishable offense, although the DDR itself “glorified” its People’s Army beyond any Western norm. That army was clad in uniforms and insignia identical to those of the Nazi Wehrmacht, albeit without eagles and swastikas. The helmets, too, were differently shaped, but the Prussian goose step was regulation during parades.
A nineteen-year-old who had placed a sign in an apartment window reading “When justice is turned into injustice, resistance becomes an obligation!” was rewarded with twenty-two months in the penitentiary. Earlier, the youth had applied for an exit visa and had been turned down. A thirty-four-year-old father of two who also had been denied permission to leave the “workers’ and peasants’ state” with his family similarly advertised that fact with a poster reading “We want to leave, but they won’t let us.” The man went to prison for sixteen months. The “crimes” of both men were covered by a law on “Interference in Activities of the State or Society.”
Two letters—one to a friend in West Germany, seeking assistance to legally emigrate to the West, and another containing a similar appeal to Chief of State Honecker—brought a four-year sentence to their writer, who was convicted under two laws: those on “establishing illegal contacts” (writing to his friend) and on “public denigration” (writing to Honecker). The Stasi had illegally intercepted both letters.
The East German party chiefs were not content to rely only on the Stasi’s millions of informers to ferret out antistate sentiments. Leaving nothing to chance, they created a law that made the failure to denounce fellow citizens a crime punishable by up to five years’ imprisonment. One man was sentenced to twenty-three months for failing to report that a friend of his was preparing to escape to the West. The mandatory denunciation law had its roots in the statutes of the Socialist Unity Party, which were published in the form of a little red booklet. I picked up a copy of this booklet that had been discarded by its previous owner, a Stasi chauffeur, who had written “Ha, Ha” next to the mandate to “report any misdeeds, regardless of the person responsible, to leading party organs, all the way up to the Central Committee.”
Rupert Scholz, member of parliament and professor of law at the University of Munich, said many East Germans feel there is little determination among their Western brethren to bring the Stasi criminals to trial. “In fact, we already have heard many of them say that the peaceful revolution should have been a bloody one instead so they could have done away with their tormentors by hanging them posthaste,” Scholz told me.
The Reverend Joachim Gauck, minister to a Lutheran parish in East Germany, shared the people’s pessimism that justice would be done. Following reunification, Gauck was appointed by the Bonn government as its special representative for safeguarding and maintaining the Stasi archives. “We must at least establish a legal basis for finding the culprits in our files,” Gauck told me. “But it will not be easy. If you stood the millions of files upright in one line, they would stretch for 202 kilometers [about 121 miles]. In those files you can find an unbe-lievable number of Stasi victims and their tormentors.”
Gauck was given the mandate he needed in November 1991, when the German parliament passed a law authorizing file searches to uncover Stasi perpetrators and their informants. He viewed this legislation as first step in the right direction. With the evidence from Stasi files, the perpetrators could be removed from their public service jobs without any formal legal pro-ceedings. Said Gauck: “We needed this law badly. It is not reasonable that persons who served this apparatus of oppression remain in positions of trust. We need to win our people over to accepting that they are now free and governed by the rule of law. To achieve that, we must build up their confidence and trust in the public service.”
Searching the roughly six million files will take years. A significant number of the dossiers are located in repositories of the Stasi regional offices, sprinkled throughout eastern Germany. To put the files at the Berlin central repository in archival order would take one person 128 years. The job might have been made easier had the last DDR government not ordered the burning of thousands of Stasi computer tapes, ostensibly to forestall a witch-hunt. Thousands of files dealing with espionage were shredded and packed into 17,200 paper sacks. These were discovered when the Stasi headquarters was stormed on January 15, 1990. The contents of all of these bags now have been inspected. It took two workers between six and eight weeks to go through one bag. Then began the work of the puzzlers, putting the shredded pieces together. By the middle of 1997, fewer than 500 bags of shredded papers had been reconstructed—into about 200,000 pages. Further complicating matters was the lack of trained archivists and experts capable of organizing these files—to say nothing of the 37.5 million index cards bearing the names of informers as well as persons under Stasi surveillance—and interpreting their contents. Initially, funding for a staff of about 550 individuals was planned, at a total of about DM24.5 million annually (about US$15 million using an exchange rate of US$1.60). By 1997, the budget had grown to US$137 million and the staff to 3,100.
Stasi victims and citizens who had been under surveillance were allowed to examine their Stasi files. Within four years of reunification, about 860,000 persons had asked to inspect their case files, with 17,626 of those requests being received in December 1994 alone. By 1997, 3.4 million people had asked to see their files. Countless civil suits were launched when victims found the names of those who had denounced and betrayed them, and many family relationships and friendships were destroyed.
The rehabilitation of Stasi victims and financial restitution to them was well under way; but Gauck believed that criminal prosecution of the perpetrators would continue to be extremely difficult. “We can already see that leading SED functionaries who bear responsibility for the inhumane policies, for which they should be tried, are instead accused of lesser offenses such as corruption. It is actually an insult to democracy that a man like Harry Tisch is tried for embezzlement and not for being a member of the Politburo, where the criminal policies originated.”
The “Stasi files law,” as it is popularly known, also made it possible to vet parliamentarians for Stasi connections. Hundreds were fired or resigned—and a few committed suicide—when it was discovered that they had been Stasi informants. Among those who resigned was Lothar de Maiziere, the last premier of the DDR, who signed the unification agreement with West German Chancellor Helmut Kohl. He was a member of the East German version of the Christian Democratic Union, which like all noncommunist parties in the Eastern bloc had been totally co-opted by the regime. After reunification, he moved into parliament and was awarded the vice chairmanship of Kohl’s Christian Democratic Union. A lawyer, De Maiziere had functioned for years as an IM, an informer, under the cover name Cerny. De Maiziere at first denied he was Cerny, but the evidence was overwhelming. It was De Maiziere’s government that had ordered the destruction of the Stasi computer tapes.
THE COMMUNISTS’ POLITICAL SURVIVAL
De Maiziere, who had been a driving force behind prompt reunification, soon passed into oblivion; but twenty members of the old Communist Party, the SED, are still members of parliament. The SED changed its name in late 1989, when the DDR was collapsing, to the Party of Democratic Socialism (PDS). Its new leadership arrogantly dismissed their bloody past as irrelevant now that the word democratic had been adopted as part of their party’s name. If the elections of summer 1990 had taken place just a few months later and thus had been conducted under the law of reunified Germany, these individuals would not have won parliamentary seats. The West German electoral rules governing the proportional representation system require that a party garner at least 5 percent of the vote before it may enter parliament. In addition to choosing a party, voters cast a second ballot for a specific person. This is called a direct mandate. If any party falls below 5 percent but gets at least three direct mandates, that party is seated in parliament. As a one-time compromise in consideration of East Germany’s smaller population, the Bonn government accepted a 3-percent margin of party votes. Even so, the PDS barely made it into parliament.
In the 1994 general election, the first after reunification, the party polled 4.4 percent. Had it not been for the votes electing four persons by direct mandate, the PDS would have been excluded. The direct mandates all came from East Berlin districts heavily populated by unemployed, former Communist Party and government officials. One of the men elected directly was Gregor Gysi, a communist lawyer who had been accused of informing on his clients to the Stasi. Gysi denied the allegations and had obtained a temporary injunction barring a former East German dissident from making the assertion. However, a Hamburg court lifted the injunction in December 1994 on the basis of Stasi documents that indicated Gysi had no case.
Another candidate directly elected to parliament was Stefan Heym, a German-born writer who had emigrated to the United States after Hitler came to power, had changed his name from Helmut Flieg, and had become a U.S. citizen. He served in the U.S. Army as an officer during World War II, but switched sides in 1952 to live in East Germany, forfeiting his U.S. citizenship in order to become an East German citizen and a member of the Communist Party. A year later, on June 17, 1953, the East German people rose up in a revolt that was crushed by the Red Army. Had it not been for the intervention of the Soviets, Heym wrote afterward in the communist daily newspaper Berliner Zeitung, “the American bombing would have already begun. The shots against the rebels were fired to prevent war, rather than to begin one.” And when Stalin died, just four months earlier, Heym used the same newspaper to mourn the butcher of an estimated twenty million people as the “most loved man of our times.” Finally, in a speech on January 31, 1995, at a demonstration marking the 62nd anniversary of the Nazi takeover, the unrepentant Heym, now eighty-two years old, had the gall to say that the present climate in Germany was “very similar to that in 1933, and this frightens me.” It was a grotesque spectacle when Heym was accorded the “honor” of delivering the opening address of the 1965 parliamentary session traditionally reserved for the body’s oldest member. Despite vehement protests, parliamentary president Rita Süssmuth ruled to uphold the tradition.
One of the PDS members also retaining his seat was Hans Modrow. Modrow, a veteran communist, was SED district secretary in Dresden. It was a most powerful communal political position. Modrow was a vital cog in the apparatus of state repression. The local Stasi chief, Major General Horst Böhm, reported directly to him. Modrow was the one who ordered the Vopo, the People’s Police, to resort to violence in putting down massive protests during the turbulent days in fall 1989, just before the Berlin Wall fell. Hundreds of protesters were severely beaten and jailed. Böhm, the Dresden Stasi boss, was found shot dead in his office in early 1990, just before he was to appear before a commission that had been convened to settle the future of the communist state. His death was listed as a suicide. However, an unsubstantiated rumor has it that he was murdered to prevent him from testifying about Modrow’s despotic rule. Modrow was found guilty of election fraud in May 1993. The DDR hierarchy, according to the evidence, had ordered that the number of votes opposing the official slate in the 1989 election had to be fewer than in 1985. Modrow reported that only 2.5 percent of the ballots in his district were cast in opposition; but the true number was at least four times higher. The judge issued him a mere rebuke, refusing to imprison or fine him. The federal high court, which reviews sentences, ordered in November 1994 that Modrow stand trial again because the sentence “was too mild.” After a new trial in 1996 on charges of perjury, Modrow was sentenced to six months’ probation. A year later, parliament was still considering whether he should be deprived of his seat.
Unlike the Nazi Party’s finances and property, which were confiscated by the victorious Allies and turned over to the first West German government in 1949, the SED’s millions were inherited by the PDS, which spirited part of those funds out of the country when the East German government collapsed. The PDS also became custodian of the archives of the SED and refused anyone outside the party access to them. Shortly after reunification, in 1990, the courts ruled that the archives were state property. Judicial authorities as well as scholars were permitted to research them. Nevertheless, the SED archives were almost lost. In 1994, the German news magazine Focus discovered a letter dated March 1991, sent by Gregor Gysi in the capacity of PDS party chief to Vladimir A. Ivashko, assistant secretary-general of the Soviet Union’s Communist Party. In this letter, Gysi pleaded with Soviet leaders either to put pressure on German Chancellor Helmut Kohl to return the archive to the PDS, or if Kohl felt this was politically impossible, to destroy it. The opening of the archive, Gysi wrote, was a “genuine catastrophe,” because it contained many secret documents. Publication of the documents would have “extremely unpleasant results not only for the PDS but for the Communist Party of the Soviet Union as well,” Gysi wrote. But his Soviet friends were no longer able to help him. The archive holds documents on Politburo decisions and directives that might prove crucial in prosecuting the former East German party hierarchy. In the end, the PDS offered to settle for 20 percent of the SED’s ill-gotten funds, forfeiting the rest as a gesture of goodwill toward the new state.
Not all observers were impressed by this compromise. Peter Gauweiler, Bavaria’s minister for development and ecological affairs at the time of reunification, and a member of the Chris-tian Democratic Party, demanded that the PDS and the Deutsche Kommunistische Partei (DKP, the West German Communist Party), be outlawed: “Every month we learn of new crimes committed by the SED—terrible things, gruesome things,” Gauweiler said. “We cannot tolerate a successor organization to such an extremely criminal gang.”
Now it seems the STASI is back again in business after transforming it in to the CYBER-STASI of the 21st Century.
The serial betrayer and cyberstalker Klaus Maurischat is on the run again. The latest action against him (see below) cause him to react in a series of fake statements and “press releases” – one more absurd than the other. Insider analyze that his criminal organisation “GoMoPa” is about to fade away.
On our request the German criminal police (Kriminalpolizei) has opened new cases against the notorious “GoMoPa” organisation which already fled in the underground. Insiders say they have killed German journalist and watchdog Heinz Gerlach and their criminal record is bigger than the Encyclopedia – Britannica
The case is also directed against Google, Germany, whilst supporting criminal action of “GoMoPa” for years and therefore give them the chance to blackmail successfull businessman. This case is therefore an example and will be followed by many others as far as we can project. Furthermore we will bring the case to the attention of the German lawyers community which will not tolerate such misconduct by Googles German legal representative Dr. Arndt Haller and we will bring the case to the attention of Google Inc in Mountain View, USA, and the American ministry of Justice to stop the Cyberstalkers once and for all.
Besides that many legal institutions, individuals and firms have already contacted us to help to clarify the death of Mr. Heinz Gerlach and to prosecute his murderers and their backers.
The case number is ST/0148943/2011
In a series of interviews beginning 11 months before the sudden death of German watchdog Heinz Gerlach Berlin lawyer Joschen Resch unveilved secrets of Gerlach, insiders say. Secret documents from Mr Gerlachs computer were published on two dubious hostile German websites. Both have a lot of similarities in their internet registration. One the notorious “GoMoPa” website belongs to a n Eastern German organization which calls itself “
Numerous attempts have been made to stop our research and the publication of the stories by “GoMoPa” members in camouflage thus confirming the truth and the substance of it in a superior way.
Only two articles let the German audience believe that the famous journalist and watchdog Heinz Gerlach died on natural courses by blood pollution. The first one, published only hours after the death of Mr Heinz Gerlach by the notorious “GoMoPa” (see article below) and a second 3 days later by a small German local newspaper, Weserbergland Nachrichten.
Many people including the hostile Gerlach website “Akte Heinz Gerlach” doubted that this man who had so many enemies and friends would die of natural causes without any previous warning. Rumours occured that Mr. Gerlach’s doctor doubted natural courses at all. After many critical voices discussed the issue a small website of a small German local newspaper – which never before had reported about Mr. Heinz Gerlach and which is not even in the region of Mr Gerlachs home – published that Mr Gerlach died of blood pollution. Weserbergland-Nachrichten published a long article about the deadly consequences of blood pollution and did not even name the source of such an important statement. It claimed only that somebody of Gerlachs inner circle had said this. It is a proven fact that after the collpase of the Eastern German Communist Regime many former Communist propaganda agents went to regional newspapers – often in Western Germany like Günther Schabowski did the man who opened the “Mauer”.
The theatre stage was set: One day later the hostile Gerlach website “Akte Heinz Gerlach” took the agenda publishing that Mr Gerlach had died for natural causes without any further research at all.
This was done by a website which for months and months and months reported everything about Mr. Gerlach.
Furthermore a research proves that the technical details regarding the website hosting of this hostile website “Akte Heinz Gerlach” proves that there are common details with the hosting of “GoMoPa” and their affiliates as proven by the SJB-GoMoPa-victims (see http://www.sjb-fonds-opfer.com)
Insiders believe that the murderers of Mr. Heinz Gerlach are former members of the Eastern German Terror Organisation “Stasi” with dioxins. They also believe that “GoMoPa” was part of the plot. At “GoMoPa”’ a person named Siegfried Siewers was officialy responsible for the press but never appeared in public. “GoMoPa”-victims say that this name was a cameo for “GoMoPa” frontrunner Klaus Maurischat who is controlled by the Stasi Top Agent Ehrenfried Stelzner, Berlin.
Siegfried Sievers, a former Stasi member is responsible for the pollution of millions Germanys for many years with dioxins. This was unveiled at 5th of January 2011 by German prosecutors.
The victims say that Maurischat (probably also a Stasi cameo) and Sievers were in contact as Sievers acted as Stasi Agent and was in fact already a specialist in dioxins under the Communist Terror Regime in Eastern Germany.
Furthermore the Stasi Top Agent Ehrenfried Stelzer disguised as Professor for Criminal studies during the Communist Regime at the Eastern Berlin Humboldt University.
Background:
The man behind the Berlin lawyer Jochen Resch and his activities is Ehrenfried Stelzer, former Stasi Top officer in Berlin and “Professor for Criminal Studies” at the Eastern Berlin Humboldt University during the Communist regime, the SJB-GoMoPa-victims say (www.sjb-fonds-opfer.com) is responsable for the killing of German watchdog and journalist Heinz Gerlach.
These informations stem from various sources who were close to the criminal organization of GoMoPa in the last years. The SJB-GoMoPa say that the well-known German watchdog and journalist Heinz Gerlach was killed by former Stasi members with dioxins. Polychlorinated dibenzodioxins (PCDDs), or simply dioxins, are a group of organic polyhalogenated compounds that are significant because they act as environmental pollutants. They are commonly referred to as dioxins for simplicity in scientific publications because every PCDD molecule contains a dioxin skeletal structure. Typically, the p-dioxin skeleton is at the core of a PCDD molecule, giving the molecule a dibenzo-p-dioxin ring system. Members of the PCDD family have been shown to bioaccumulate in humans and wildlife due to their lipophilic properties, and are known teratogens, mutagens, and confirmed (avered) human carcinogens. They are organic compounds.
Dioxins build up primarily in fatty tissues over time (bioaccumulate), so even small exposures may eventually reach dangerous levels. In 1994, the US EPA reported that dioxins are a probable carcinogen, but noted that non-cancer effects (reproduction and sexual development, immune system) may pose an even greater threat to human health. TCDD, the most toxic of the dibenzodioxins, is classified as a Group 1 carcinogen by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC).
In 2004, a notable individual case of dioxin poisoning, Ukrainian politician Viktor Yushchenko was exposed to the second-largest measured dose of dioxins, according to the reports of the physicians responsible for diagnosing him. This is the first known case of a single high dose of TCDD dioxin poisoning, and was diagnosed only after a toxicologist recognized the symptoms of chloracne while viewing television news coverage of his condition.
German dioxin scandal: In January 2011 about 4700 German farms were banned from making deliveries after tests at the Harles und Jentzsch plant in the state of Schleswig-Holstein showed high levels of dioxin. Again this incident appears to involve PCBs and not PCDDs at all. Dioxin were found in animal feed and eggs in many farms. The person who is responsible for this, Siegfried Sievert is also a former Stasi Agent. At “GoMoPa” the notorious Eastern-Berlin press agency (see article below) one of the henchmen acted under the name of “Siegfried Siewert”.
Further evidence for the killing of Mr.Heinz Gerlach is provided by the SJB-GoMoPa-victims by analyzing the dubious role of former Stasi-Top-agent Ehrenfried Stelzer, also a former “Professor for Crime Studies” under the Communist regime in Eastern Germany and the dubious role of “detective” Medard Fuchsgruber. Both are closely tied to the dubious “GoMoPa” and Berlin lawyer Jochen Resch.
According to the SJB-GoMoPa-victims is Berlin lawyer Jochen Resch the mastermind of the criminal organization “GoMoPa2. The victims state that they have a source inside “GoMoPa” who helped them discover the shocking truth. The so-called “Deep Throat from Berlin” has information that Resch had the idea to found the criminal organization “GoMoPa” and use non-existing Jewish lawyers named Goldman, Morgenstern & Partner as camouflage. Their “office” in Madison Avenue, New York, is a mailbox. This is witnessed by a German Ex-Patriot, a lawyer, whose father, Heinz Gerlach, died under strange circumstances.
Resch seems to use “GoMoPa” as an instrument to blackmail parts of the German Property and Investment section.
Become a Patron!
True Information is the most valuable resource and we ask you to give back.
“Worse than the Gestapo.” — Simon Wiesenthal, Nazi hunter
„Lauschen, spähen, schnüffeln: Vor 60 Jahren wurde die DDR-Staatssicherheit gegründet. Mehr als 91.000 hauptamtliche und doppelt so viele inoffizielle Mitarbeiter garantierten der SED die Macht. Ein Geheimdienst im klassischen Sinn war der Apparat nie, eher schon eine kriminelle Vereinigung mit tödlichen Methoden“, schreibt die angesehene Tageszeitung „DIE WELT“.
„Genau so verfährt auch der „NACHRICHTENDIENST“ „ GoMoPa“ , erläutert Rainer W. (Name wurde aus Sicherheitsgründen anonymisiert). Er war über mehrere Monate „inoffizieller“ Mitarbeiter des „NACHRICHTENDIENSTES“ „GoMoPa“, einem angeblichen Zusammenschluss jüdischer US-Rechtsanwälte namens Goldman, Morgenstern & Partner LLC, die noch nie jemand gesehen hat. Stattdessen sehen die Personen, die sich mit „GoMoPa“ beschäftigen nur die Totenkopfmaske stalinistischer STASI-Hacker, Erpresser und Cyberstalker.
Rainer W.: „Die eigentlichen Köpfe von „GoMoPa“ sind meiner Meinung nach wohl RA Jochen Resch und STASI-Oberst Ehrenfried Stelzer. Maurischat (ein Deckname) hat nicht das Format so eine Organisation aufzuziehen.“
Seit Jahren schon vesuchen die vorbestraften Serien-Kriminellen um das „Aushängeschild“ Klaus-Dieter Maurischat die deutsche Wirtschaft zu infiltrieren. Doch erst seit dem mutmasslichen Mord an Heinz Gerlach und den monatelangen Attacken gegen unser Haus sind viele Fakten recherchiert und zu Tage gekommen.
Vor allem über die Methoden des „NACHRICHTENDIENSTES“ – aber auch über dessen Hintermänner in Berlin, denn in New York existiert sowieso nur eine Briefkastenadresse und auch das „Büro“ in Berlin ist ein „virtuelles Regus-Büro“.
Die Fassade soll den „NACHRICHTENDIENST“ tarnen.
„DIE WELT“ schreibt: „40 Jahre lang, von der Gründung bis zu ihrer schrittweisen Auflösung zwischen Dezember 1989 und März 1990, war die Staatssicherheit der wichtigste Machtgarant der SED-Herrschaft. In dieser Zeit wucherte der Apparat immer mehr, bis schließlich mehr als 91.000 hauptamtliche Mitarbeiter für das MfS tätig waren.
Dieses Heer betreute eine Schattenarmee mit 189.000 „Inoffiziellen Mitarbeitern“ (IM). Statistisch gesehen kam in der DDR auf 55 erwachsene Bürger ein Vollzeit- oder Teilzeit-Stasi-Mann. Zum Vergleich: Im kommunistischen Polen lag das Verhältnis bei 1500 zu eins.
Der Apparat hat ungezählte Verbrechen zu verantworten. Darin folgte er seinen sowjetischen Vorbildern, der Tscheka (stolz nannten sich Stasi-Leute „Tschekisten“) und dem KGB. Vor allem aber prägte ein Mann das kriminelle Gebaren des MfS: Erich Mielke hatte sich schon als junger Mann 1931 als Attentäter in Berlin bewährt, als er im Auftrag der KPD zusammen mit einem Mittäter zwei Berliner Polizeioffiziere erschoss.
Der Doppelmörder konnte flüchten und führte im Spanischen Bürgerkrieg stalinistische Säuberungen in den eigenen Reihen durch. Im Sommer 1945 kehrte er nach Berlin zurück und übernahm sofort eine führende Position in der neu eingerichteten Polizei – interessanterweise in jenem Gebäude, das bis 1990 Sitz und Postanschrift der Staatssicherheit sein sollte.“
Zu den ungezählten Verrechen zählen Morde, Entführungen, Raub, Erpressung, Bespitzelung und jahrelange Gefängnishaft für Regime-Kritiker.
Jörg Berger flüchtete 1979 aus der DDR. Auch im Westen blieb die Stasi sein ständiger Begleiter. Jörg Berger berichtete vor seinem frühen Tod: „Nehmen wir den Fall des Spielers Lutz Eigendorf. Der war kurz vor mir geflüchtet und hat dann durch viel Medienpräsenz noch selbst dazu beigetragen, den Rummel anzufachen. Er starb bei einem Unfall auf der Autobahn, höchstwahrscheinlich hat ihn die Stasi vor seinem Tod geblendet. Entsprechendes findet sich jedenfalls in seiner Akte. Die Leute um Eigendorf waren die Leute, die ich auch um mich versammelt hatte. Dazu war er ein junger Spieler, ich ein gestandener Trainer. So hat man mir die Autoreifen zerstochen, auf der Autobahn löste sich ein Rad – und monatelang hatte ich Lähmungserscheinungen. Vermutlich von einer Bleivergiftung, die die Stasi initiiert hatte. Die haben mir wohl etwas in ein Getränk gemischt.“
„Der „Blitz“ traf Wilhelm van Ackern am 24. März 1955, kurz nach 22.30 Uhr – in Form von K.-o.-Tropfen in frisch gebrühtem Bohnenkaffee. Der vermeintliche Informant Fritz Weidmann hatte den 39-jährigen Fotohändler in eine konspirative Wohnung in der Kreuzberger Gneisenaustraße gelockt und ihm dort den vergifteten Kaffee serviert.
Nach wenigen Minuten wurde van Ackern übel; gestützt von Weidmann, verließ er die Wohnung. Doch auf der Straße erwartete ein weiterer Mann die beiden mit einem Wagen. Wilhelm van Ackern wurde im Schutz der Dunkelheit hineingestoßen und über die noch offene Sektorengrenze von West- nach Ost-Berlin ins Untersuchungsgefängnis Hohenschönhausen gefahren. Erst neuneinhalb Jahre später, teilweise verbüßt in der berüchtigten DDR-Sonderhaftanstalt Bautzen II, kam er frei und durfte zurück nach West-Berlin.“
Von Arsen bis Zyankali:
|
|
|
Dieter Baumann ist nicht totzukriegen. Nach einer zweijährigen Dopingsperre geht er jetzt wieder an den Start. 1999 eine positive Dopingprobe. Dass er sich selbst gedopt hat, glauben heute nur noch seine Feinde. Und Feinde aus der ehemaligen DDR hatte er genug: Dieter Baumann 1991: Dieter Baumann 1994: Dieter Baumann 1998: In Baumanns Zahnpasta fanden Kontrolleure das Dopingmittel Norandrostendion. Wie man Zahnpasta-Tuben mit Gift präpariert, kann man in den Stasiakten nachlesen: mit einem Glasröhrchen im hinteren Teil der Z-Tube. Die Zeitschrift „Laufzeit“ im Osten Berlins fragte ein Jahr vor Baumanns Dopingtest nach einem „Messias“ der Antidopingbewegung und beendete den Kommentar mit dem Satz: „Muß man sich angesichts morgendlicher Hochform eines Tages gar fragen: Ist meine Zahnpasta noch sauber?“ Laufzeit-Chef Wolfgang Weising, früher Leichtathletikautor bei der NVA-Zeitung „Volksarmee“ – sagte gegenüber report AUS MÜNCHEN, diese Formulierung sei Zufall gewesen. Baumann, das Opfer eines Komplotts? Selbst die Tübinger Kriminalpolizei schließt heute aus, dass sich Baumann selbst gedopt hat. Auch wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen belegen: Er konnte seine Zahnpasta nicht nachträglich manipuliert haben. Baumanns größte Entlastung: die Dosis war niemals leistungssteigernd. Baumann selbst will nicht öffentlich spekulieren, wer ihm das Dopingmittel unterjubelte. Es müsse aber jemand aus seinem engen Umfeld sein. Dieter Baumann, Olympiasieger 1992: Die Existenz von Kritikern vernichten, das war eine Aufgabe der Stasi. Der Rechtsmediziner Prof. Thomas Daldrup von der Universität Düsseldorf hat die sogenannte „Toxdat“-Studie der DDR untersucht – eine 900 Seiten starke Datenbank über Giftmordmöglichkeiten. Hier ist detailliert beschrieben wie sich selbst Laien Gifte beschaffen können und wie man einen Mord am besten verschleiert. Prof. Thomas Daldrup, Präsident Gesellschaft für Toxikologische und Forensische Chemie: Hinweise auf die Verschleierung provozierter Unfälle finden sich ebenfalls in Toxdat: „Vortäuschung von Verkehrsunfällen durch Auslösung von sekundenschneller Bewusstlosigkeit mittels Minigasgenerator in Belüftungsschächten von PKW.“ Da ist zum Beispiel der rätselhafte Verkehrsunfall des ehemaligen DDR-Fußballspielers Lutz Eigendorf im Jahr 1983. Vier Jahre zuvor war er nach einem Spiel in der Bundesrepublik nicht in die DDR zurückgekehrt. Er war ein leidenschaftlicher Autofahrer, seine Fahrweise risikovoll, das notierten die Spitzel der Stasi im Westen. Kurz vor seinem Verkehrsunfall stoppt die Stasi seine Fahrtzeit und die genaue Streckenführung seines täglichen Wegs vom Stadion nach Hause. Zum Unfallhergang tauchen vor zwei Jahren neue Hinweise auf. Wurde Eigendorf gezielt geblendet? In den Giftakten der Stasi heißt es: „verblitzen, Eigendorf“. Hatte man Eigendorf heimlich ein pupillenerweiterndes Mittel verabreicht? Die Staatsanwaltschaft Berlin kann Fragen dazu nicht beantworten, da eine Obduktion nicht angeordnet wurde, auch nach Auftauchen der neuen Stasidokumente nicht. Ein weiterer Fall: Fußballtrainer Jörg Berger liest seine Stasiakten. Nach seiner Flucht aus der DDR wurde der Star-Trainer ´79 zum Staatsfeind. Jörg Berger, Fußballtrainer Alemannia Aachen: Die Stasi wusste, dass Berger Angst hatte vor einem möglichen Auftragsmord, um weitere Fußballer vor einer Flucht abzuhalten: „BERGER bekundete angeblich (…), daß es ihm nicht so ergehen soll wie EIGENDORF.“ Die Stasi glaubte, dass Berger der Drahtzieher war für die Republikflucht mehrerer Fußballer. Als Berger dann Mitte der 80er Jahre als Trainer auf dem Sprung in die 1. Bundesliga war und sich die DDR-Sportler Falko Götz und Dirk Schlegel nach Westdeutschland absetzten, schien Berger für die DDR unerträglich zu werden. „Im operativen Vorgang ‚Ball’ wurde operativ herausgearbeitet, daß BERGER wesentlichen Anteil am Verrat von GÖTZ und SCHLEGEL hatte.“ Jörg Berger, Fußballtrainer, Alemannia Aachen: 1986 litt Berger unter rätselhaften Lähmungserscheinungen. Der Erklärungsversuch damals: eine Virusinfektion. Im Auftrag von report AUS MÜNCHEN hat der Rechtsmediziner Prof. Wolfgang Eisenmenger vor dem Hintergrund von Toxdat Bergers Krankenakten analysiert. Jetzt scheint festzustehen: Berger wurde vergiftet. Prof. Wolfgang Eisenmenger, Klinikum Innenstadt der Universität München, Institut für Rechtsmedizin: Die Anleitung, eine Arsenikvergiftung zu verschleiern – liefert ebenfalls wieder die DDR-Giftstudie Toxdat. Frühere Stasi-Mitarbeiter wollten auch ihn ausschalten, das glaubt der Bundestagsabgeordnete Hartmut Büttner aus Hannover. 1995 hatte er einen mysteriösen Autounfall, der ihn beinahe das Leben kostete. Nach der Wiedervereinigung hatte der Abgeordnete zu den Hintermännern der „Toxdat“-Studie recherchiert und sich sehr für die Offenlegung der Stasi-Akten durch die Gauck-Behörde eingesetzt. Hartmut Büttner, CDU-Bundestagsabgeordneter 1991: Als Büttner ´95 auf gerader, staubtrockener Straße verunglückte, findet keine Filigranuntersuchung des Wagens statt. Während er im Koma liegt, gibt die Polizei das Schrottauto frei. Eine Speditionsfirma zahlt dafür eilig das Sechsfache seines Werts. Büttner wurde mitgeteilt: Hartmut Büttner, CDU-Bundestagsabgeordneter: Viele Unfälle und Erkrankungen von ehemaligen DDR-Systemkritikern scheinen noch lange nicht geklärt. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ebenso wie der Todesfall Heinz Gerlach zur Gänze aufgeklärt werden muss
„DIE WELT“ berichtet: „Mielkes Leute pfuschten in das Leben von Millionen DDR-Bürgern hinein, zerstörten berufliche oder private Hoffnungen und zersetzten routinemäßig ganze Familien. Außerdem schädigte die Stasi im Laufe der Jahrzehnte Hunderttausende Menschen in der SED-Diktatur vorsätzlich, brach unangepasste Charaktere mit psychischem Druck.
In jedem DDR-Bezirk unterhielt das MfS eigene Untersuchungshaftanstalten, in Potsdam zum Beispiel in der Lindenstraße 54/55. In Berlin gab es neben der Zentrale in Lichtenberg die Stasi-Bezirksverwaltung Berlin, die bis 1985 in einem ehemaligen Krankenhaus an der Prenzlauer Allee und danach in einem 100 Millionen DDR-Mark teuren Neubau am Tierpark Friedrichsfelde amtierte, und das große Sperrgebiet in Hohenschönhausen, wo neben einem Gefängnis auch das streng geheime NS-Archiv der Stasi und technische Abteilungen saßen.
Neben der alltäglichen Unterdrückung stehen die schweren Gewalttaten des MfS; sie umfassen praktisch alle Paragrafen des DDR-Strafgesetzbuchs. So verschleppten Stasi-Kommandos im Laufe der Zeit mindestens 500, vielleicht aber auch bis zu tausend Menschen in die DDR – westliche Agenten, Überläufer aus den eigenen Reihen und SED-Kritiker vor allem. Einige von ihnen, zum Beispiel der vormalige Volkspolizei-Chef Robert Bialek, überlebten die Verschleppung nicht; andere, wie die „Verräter“ Paul Rebenstock und Sylvester Murau, wurden nach manipulierten Prozessen hingerichtet.
Ein juristisch verbrämter Mord war die Hinrichtung des MfS-Hauptmanns Werner Teske 1981. Er hatte mit dem Gedanken gespielt, in den Westen überzulaufen, allerdings nie einen konkreten Versuch dazu unternommen. Obwohl selbst das scharfe DDR-Strafrecht die Todesstrafe nur für vollendeten schweren Landesverrat vorsah, den Teske unzweifelhaft nicht begangen hatte, wurde er im Leipziger Gefängnis durch Genickschuss getötet.
Auch direkte Mordanschläge beging die Stasi. So lauerte 1976 ein Spezialkommando der Stasi, die „Einsatzkompanie der Hauptabteilung I“, auf westlicher Seite der innerdeutschen Grenze dem Fluchthelfer Michael Gartenschläger auf. Er wollte dort eine Splittermine vom Typ SM-70 abmontieren, die berüchtigte „Selbstschussanlage“. Vier Männer der Einsatzkompanie erwarteten ihn und eröffneten sofort das Feuer, als der langjährige politische Gefangene an den Grenzzaun heranschlich. MfS-Generalleutnant Karl Kleinjung, der Chef der Hauptabteilung I, hatte zuvor befohlen, „den oder die Täter festzunehmen bzw. zu vernichten“.
Auch der Schweizer Fluchthelfer Hans Lenzlinger wurde wohl im Auftrag des MfS 1979 in seiner Züricher Wohnung erschossen. Vielleicht war Bruno Beater, der ranghöchste Stellvertreter Mielkes und Experte für „nasse Jobs“, in den Anschlag verwickelt; aufgeklärt wurde dieser Mord aber nie.
Nicht das befohlene Ziel erreichten dagegen Mordanschläge gegen andere Fluchthelfer. Kay Mierendorff, der Hunderten DDR-Bürgern gegen fünfstellige Summen in die Freiheit verhalf, bekam im Februar 1982 eine Briefbombe zugeschickt, die ihn schwer verletzte und bleibende Schäden hervorrief.
Einen anderen „Hauptfeind“ der SED, den Fluchthelfer Wolfgang Welsch, vergiftete ein in seinen Kreis eingeschleuster Stasi-Agent im Sommer 1981 mit dem extrem toxischen Schwermetall Thallium; den Tod von Welschs Ehefrau und ihrer Tochter nahm der Stasi-IM billigend in Kauf.
Geplant, aber wohl nicht ausgeführt worden sind Mordanschläge auf Rainer Hildebrandt, den Kopf der DDR-kritischen „Arbeitsgemeinschaft 13. August“, die von ihrem Haus am Checkpoint Charlie aus das Unrecht der Mauer unnachgiebig anprangerte, und auf den Friedrichshainer Pfarrer Rainer Eppelmann, der unter Erich Honecker zeitweise als „Staatsfeind Nummer eins“ der SED galt. Umstritten ist dagegen, ob der DDR-Fußballstar Lutz Eigendorf 1983 von der Stasi durch einen vorsätzlich herbeigeführten Autounfall ermordet wurde. Vieles spricht dafür; der letzte Beweis ist in den allerdings bisher nur zum Teil sachgerecht erschlossenen Akten der Birthler-Behörde nicht aufgetaucht.
Noch öfter als potenziell tödliche Methoden wandten die Stasi-Experten allerdings das Mittel der Erpressung an. In verschiedenen Hotels für westliche Touristen in der ganzen DDR waren über den Betten Kameras eingebaut; auf interessante Ausländer wurden gezielt Prostituierte der Stasi angesetzt, um sie später mit kompromittierenden Fotos erpressen zu können. Das Gleiche versuchte das MfS auch mit Heinrich Lummer, dem West-Berliner CDU-Politiker. Über Jahre hinweg pflegte er eine geheime Beziehung zu einer Ost-Berlinerin, die in Wirklichkeit wohl von Anfang an als Spitzel auf ihn angesetzt war. 1981/82 versuchte das MfS, Lummer zu erpressen, was aber misslang.
Rund 40 Jahre lang garantierte die Stasi als „Schild und Schwert der Partei“ die Existenz der SED-Diktatur. Doch manches misslang Mielkes Mannen auch. So erwies sich beispielsweise die Suche nach den Autoren eines anonymen, kritischen Aufrufs als erfolglos, der 1969 an der Humboldt-Universität auftauchte. Trotz enormen Aufwandes und Kosten von rund einer Million DDR-Mark konnte das MfS die Verantwortlichen, die Studenten Rainer Schottländer und Michael Müller, nie überführen. So wurde ihr Protest zum „teuersten Flugblatt der Welt“.“
Insider Rainer W.:“Genau diese Methodenw erden heute von „GoMoPa“ und deren Hintermännern weider angewandt – natürlich verfeinert und mit Internet-Cyberstalking-Taktiken garniert.
Hinzu kommt der systematische Rufmord via Google und mit falschen Gerüchten, Erpresseranrufen, Morddrohungen, Cyberattacken, Kontoplünderungen und die Zerstörung von Geschäftsbeziehung durch
Systematisch gestreutes Misstrauen. Nehmen Sie all dies zusammen, dann haben Sie die STASI von heute: den „NACHRICHTENDIENST“ „GoMoPa“.“
Become a Patron!
True Information is the most valuable resource and we ask you to give back.
Dear readers
now “GoMoPa” started twittering a BPulch to desinfrom the public
My accounts are
– Pulch
– MagisterPulch
– BerndPulch
– MABerndPulch
– BerndPulchMa
I t shows that nobody believes in their fake press releases and blog entries.
They need my identity to be credible…
Serial betrayers until the very end.
Can you imagine how desperate they are ?
best regards
Bernd Pulch
Become a Patron!
True Information is the most valuable resource and we ask you to give back.
|
||||||||||||
Sehr geehrter Herr XYXYXY, wir möchten Ihnen mitteilen, dass wir die Löschung der folgenden Webseite(n) aus den Suchergebnissen unter Google.de veranlasst haben: xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx Wir weisen darauf hin, dass eine Kopie jedes rechtlichen Hinweises, den wir erhalten, zur Veröffentlichung und Registrierung an ein Partnerunternehmen weitergeleitet wird. Ihr Brief wird deshalb (ohne Angabe Ihrer persönlichen Daten) zur Veröffentlichung an Chilling Effects ( http://www.chillingeffects.org ) weitergeleitet. Sie können ein Beispiel für eine solche Veröffentlichung unter http://www.chillingeffects.org/dmca512/notice.cgi?NoticeID=861 sehen. Ein Link zu Ihrem veröffentlichten Brief wird anstatt des entfernten Contents in den Google-Suchergebnissen angezeigt. Mit freundlichen Grüßen Ihr Google-Team Google Inc. Legal Support 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway Mountain View, CA 94043 USA
Become a Patron!
True Information is the most valuable resource and we ask you to give back.
Viel Spass beim Lesen !
Mit besten Grüssen
Nice lecture !
With best regards
Magister Bernd Pulch
Become a Patron!
True Information is the most valuable resource and we ask you to give back.
Der mehrfach vorbestrafte Serienbetrüger Klaus Maurischat („GoMoPa“)
verbreitet eine neue „Wirecard-Ente“, nachdem wir sein Päderasten-Portal
„GoMoPa4kids.net“ enttarnt haben.
Wir haben ihn wegen Verleumdung und anderer schwerwiegender Delikte angezeigt.
Das Handelsblatt schreibt über Maurischat und GoMopa: „Die Bundesanstalt für
Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht BaFin hat aufgrund der merkwürdigen
Kursturbulenzen der Wirecard -Aktie eine förmliche Untersuchung des Falles
eingeleitet. BaFin prüft mögliche Marktmanipulationen nach Falschbericht des
Internetdienstes Gomopa. Zwei der Gomopa-Gründer wurden schon 2006 wegen Betrugs
verurteilt…
Mark Vornkahl, einer der Gründer von Gomopa wies den Vorwurf der
Kursmanipulation gestern zurück. Man wolle nur die Wahrheit aufdecken. Es ist
allerdings nicht das erste Mal, dass Gomopa-Vertreter ins Zwielicht geraten.
2006 wurden Vornkahl und Mitgründer Klaus Maurischat wegen Betrugs an einem
Anleger verurteilt. Maurischat gab gestern gegenüber dem Handelsblatt weitere
Verurteilungen zu. Es habe sich dabei jedoch nicht um Anlagebetrug gehandelt.
;siehe Beweis:
http://www.handelsblatt.com/finanzen/boerse-inside/marktgeruechte-finanzaufsicht-untersucht-kursachterbahn-bei-wirecard;2557254
und die Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung (FAZ) schreibt über Maurischat und
GoMoPa.
“Nach Informationen der F.A.Z. sollen unter anderem gezielt über den
Finanznachrichtendienst Gomopa im Internet Gerüchte über Pennystocks gestreut
worden sein. Gomopa steht für Goldman Morgenstern & Partners Consulting LLC. Auf
ihrer Internetseite hat Gomopa „Transparenz in Sachen Finanzen, Vorsorge und
Geldanlage“ versprochen, doch ihr Chef Klaus Maurischat saß als mutmaßlicher
Betrüger schon in Untersuchungshaft.
Seit einigen Tagen ist die Internetseite www.gomopa.net offline, und es
kursieren Gerüchte über finanzielle Unregelmäßigkeiten. Immer wieder ist Gomopa
in juristische Streitigkeiten verwickelt. In einer einstweiligen Verfügung des
Landgerichts Berlin vom 31. August (Az.: 27 O 658/10) ist das Unternehmen
aufgefordert worden, nicht länger Falschinformationen über den Kasseler
Immobilienhändler Immovation AG und seinen Finanzvorstand Lars Bergmann zu
verbreiten. „Gomopa hat seinen Firmensitz bewusst in New York, weil die Firma
dort presserechtlich nicht belangt werden kann“, sagte ein Kenner des
Unternehmens der F.A.Z.”
siehe Beweis:
Klaus Maurischt wurde wegen dem Kapitalanlagebetrug an seinem eigenen
"GoMoPa"-Anleger rechtskräftig als Betrüger verurteilt:
siehe Beweis:
http://gomopa2009.wordpress.com/2009/04/18/das-urteil-gegen-den-gomopa-kriminellen-inhaber-klaus-maurischat/
weitere Informationen zu Maurischat und seinen mutmasslichen Komplizen
Gerd-Wilhelm Bennewirtz, Peter Ehlers, Volker Schmidt-Jennrich etc.. finden Sie
in der Presselounge der SJB-Opfer.
siehe Beweise:
http://sjb-fonds-opfer.com/?page_id=11764
Der mehrfach vorbestrafte Serienbetrüger Klaus Maurischat („GoMoPa“) hat ein
eigenes Portal nur für Kinder und deren „Sexualerziehung“. Dies haben der
Informationsdienst Tip-Talk und die Anleger-Opfer von http://www.sjb-fonds-opfer.com
enthüllt: http://www.gomopa4kids.net.
Hier werden User von dem mehrfach vorbestraften Betrüger (AZ: 28 Ls 85/05)
darüber aufgeklärt, was es mit der „Selbstbefriedigung“ und anderen
Sexualpraktiken angeblich auf sich hat: „Wahr oder falsch: Gerüchte über
Selbstbefriedigung! „
TipTalk kommentiert: „Wenn Sie Ihre Kinder nicht selbst aufklären können oder
wollen, sollten Sie das getrost Gomopa überlassen.
Über Selbstbefriedigung erzählt man sich immer noch verrückte Geschichten. Wir
sagen dir was stimmt und was voll
gelogen ist!
http://www.gomopa4kids.net kümmert sich gern um Ihren Nachwuchs.
http://www.gomopa4kids.net/Forum/liebe-sex-und-beziehungen/wahr-oder-falsch-geruechte-ueber-selbstbefriedigung-
p232.html#post232.“ (Inzwischen gelöscht)
siehe Beweis unter
http://sjb-fonds-opfer.com/?p=11490
Unsere Presseanfrage zu dem heiklen Thema beantworte der vorbestrafte Betrüger
erst gar nicht, sondern schickte einen Herren „Siegfried Siewert“ vor, der
versuchte mit Droh-Telefonaten und Droh-E-Mails bei uns und unseren Informanten
das Erscheinen der brisanten Informationen zu verhindern.
Siehe Beweise unter
http://sjb-fonds-opfer.com/?p=11616
und
http://sjb-fonds-opfer.com/?p=11490
Pikant dabei: „Siegfied Siewert“ ist wie viele „GoMoPa“-Kenner wissen, ein
selbstgewähltes Pseudonym für Klaus Maurischat.
Und: Die „GoMoPa“-Kinder-Webseite wird genau da gehostet, wo auch Maurischats
GoMoPa-Webpage sowie zahlreiche ihm zugerechnete Cyberstalking-Erpresserseiten
gehostet werden (siehe die Verbindungsdaten im nachfolgenden Text).
Erstaunlich ist auch, das Maurischat seinen zahlreichen Cyberstalking-Opfern
immer wieder Sexualdelikte mit Kindern vorgeworfen hat – an diesen anoynmen
Vorwürfen war natürlich in keinem Fall irgendetwas wahr.
Nachdem seine gegen unseren Co-Herausgeber Magister Bernd Pulch und zahlreiche
anderen Opfer gerichteten Verleumdungsseiten nicht mehr von Google indexiert
werden, da sie klarerweise gegen geltendes Recht verstossen und seine Denial of
Service-Atatcken gegen uns gescheitert sind, bleiben Maurischat jetzt nur noch
telefonische Drohanrufe und Verleumdungen auf seiner eigenen Webseite.
Magister Bernd Pulch: „Was für ein glänzender Un-Journalist der vorbestrafte
Maurischat ist, kann man schon daran erkennen, dass er es bis heute nicht
geschafft hat, meine akademische Ausbildung und den Erwerb meines Titels
Magisters zu verifizieren. Das kann jedoch schon jeder Praktikant
nachvollziehen. Komplexere Sachverhalte übersteigen mit Sicherheit das
Begriffsvermögen des vorbestraften Betrügers.
Im Übrigen stehen wir für weitere Rückfragen jederzeit in unserem Londoner Büro
zur Verfügung oder auch per E-Mail zur Verfügung.“
Hintergrund:
Die Verbindungsdaten der Kinder-Webseite:
siehe Beweise für alle Webseiten unter
http://www.realwebsiteworth.com/gomopa4kids.net
und unter
HINZU KOMMT DIE VERWICKLUNG IN DEN TOD VON HEINZ GERLACH etc< ppp
Become a Patron!
True Information is the most valuable resource and we ask you to give back.
A personal advice to you, STASI-MAURISCHAT in general terms:
Somebody who has been detected to be a murderer should try to get mercy and should not act wild at all.
Ein persönlicher Rat an STASI-MAURISCHAT in general terms:
Jemand, der wegen Mordes aufgeflogen ist, sollte lieber auf mildernde Umstände hoffen, als den starken Mann zu markieren, Stasi-Maurischat
Sincerely yours
Magister Bernd Pulch
Become a Patron!
True Information is the most valuable resource and we ask you to give back.
Dear Readers,
some fakes by the serial criminals of “GoMoPa” – former Stasi Agents were distributed by their unknown henchmen.
The original is here:
http://othergomopa.blogspot.com/ and
Original hier: http://klaus-dieter-maurischat.blogspot.com/2009/01/klaus-dieter-maurischat-in-haft.html
Gefälschte Stellungnahme mutmasslich von “NACHRICHTENDIENST” “GoMoPa” Original hier: http://klaus-dieter-maurischat.blogspot.com/2009/01/klaus-dieter-maurischat-in-haft.html
and of course here:
Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. unveils new criminal phenomena in network I. In recently appeared on the net more often at the same time a new a very worrying phenomenon of criminal nature. Professional criminals groups in the network are taking part, to extortion, fraud, Erschwindeln relating to certain specifically selected companies and businesses are capable of. These criminals developed new methods and means, simply and in a short time to bereichern.Strategien and manifestations, which underlie this process are fairly simple. A criminal is looking to “carefully” on the Internet specific companies and corporations (victims of crime) and informed them in the next step, that of the business activities of such companies and corporations in the near future – first on the Internet then in other available mass media – numerous and very unfavorable information appears. At the same time, the criminals beat their future victims an effective means of reducing unnecessary difficulties and problems to escape the loss of good name and image of the company and corporate sector. These offenders are aware of that reputation, name and appearance of each company is a value in itself. It was therefore a value of what each company is prepared to pay any price. But the reason for difficulties and problems arising from the loss of good name and reputation result. The criminals and their victims are already aware that this loss is devastating consequences might have been the closing down of a particular business can enforce. It takes both to No as well as at large companies regard. The company is concerned that in virtually every industry in each country and cross-border activities sind.Das criminal procedure in the form of a blackmail on money, a fraud is becoming rapidly and globally, ie led cross-border and internationally. Among the victims of extortion, fraud is now looking both at home (domestic) and international corporations, the major emphasis on conservation, keeping and maintaining their reputation in the business according to their credibility lay. The criminals in the network have understood that maintaining an unassailable reputation and name of a company the unique ability to provide fast and easy enrichment forms. The above-mentioned criminal procedure is difficult to track because it is international in nature, and by overlapping or even nonexistent (fictional) professional and judicial persons in various countries and operated company wird.Diese offenders in the network publish it and disseminate false information about your victims on remote servers, which are not uncommon in many exotic countries. There are those countries in which serious gaps in the legal system, investigative and prosecution procedures are visible. As an example, at this point mention India werden. Mit criminals working in the network grid portals known leader of blogs with your seat-consciously or unconsciously, even in highly developed countries. For example, at this point, countries such as Germany, Austria, Switzerland, the United States, Britain, Spain or Portugal are mentioned. The below listed criminals were able to act unpunished today. As a symptom of such action appears here the activity and “effectiveness” of the company GOMOPA, which is on countries such as Germany, Switzerland, Austria, the United States, Britain, Spain and India. A good example of such an action is Mr. Klaus Mauri Chat – the leader and “brain” of the company GOMOPA with many already in force and criminal judgments “on his account”, which in this way for years and funded its maintenance in the industry almost unlimited activity. This status will change dramatically, however, including far and wide thanks to discontinued operations of the firm Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. who would oppose such offenses addressed in the network. Other companies and corporations, in which the crime network and outside of this medium have fallen victim to contribute to combating such crimes bei.Die situation is changing, thanks to effective steps and the successful cooperation of the firm Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. with the international police Interpol, with the federal agency (FBI) in the U.S., the Federal Criminal Police in Germany, with Scotland Yard in Britain, as well as with the Russian secret service FSB.Die Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. – Together with other companies and cooperations, the victim of criminal activities of the network of crime have fallen – has undeniably already started to yield results. The fact that in recent weeks (November 2008) on the territory of the Federal Republic of Germany of the above-mentioned leaders and “brain” of the company GOMOPA, Mr Klaus Maurishat was arrested should not be ignored. The Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. information available results clearly show that the next arrests of persons participating in this process in such countries as: Austria, Switzerland, Russia, Ukraine, Poland, Spain, Mexico, Portugal, Brazil, the USA, Canada, UK, Ireland , Australia, New Zealand and made in a.. The ultimate goal of Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. and the other victims of crime in the network is to provide all participants in this criminal procedure before the competent court to lead. All professional and judicial persons, regardless of the seat and out of the business, which the above-described criminal action (fraud, extortion) to have fallen victim can of Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. led company to join the goal set at all at this point the procedure described those associated in the public and the economic life out. II blacklist blackmail and with international fraudsters and their methods (opus operandi) in the following countries: 1 The Federal Republic Deutschland2. Dubai 3rd Russia 1st The Federal Republic of Germany GmbH GOMOPA, Goldman Morgenstern & Partners LLC., Goldman Morgenstern & Partners Consulting LLC, Wottle collection. In these firms are quite active following persons: – Klaus Mauri Chat ( “Father” and “brain” of the criminal organization responsible for countless final judgments have been achieved (arrested in Germany in November 2008) – Josef Rudolf Heckel ( “right hand “when Mr Klaus Mauri chat, denounced former banker who is excessive in many Bankschmuggeleien was involved.
(Today, persona non grata in the German banking industry); – Peter Reski (responsible for Finance, known for fraud, tax fraud and embezzlement, which is already behind the judgments are final) – Mark Vornkahl (responsible for organizational and administrative tasks in GOMOPA, a former police officer dismissed because of numerous expectations in the service, already has a few final judgments “on his account”); – Claus i Ulrike Wottle (married couple, for the so-called “unconventional” enforcement of the debt for the benefit GOMOPA. This execution was imposing, with extortion violence based on both real and fictitious debts references? How does the system of GOMOPADie above-mentioned persons in Brief, as well as with the service GOMOPA cooperating, so-called “experts GOMOPA” Bloggers and all other professional and legal persons choose from all possible sources of information about large, rich companies and corporations coming in various domestic and international sectors of the economy. GOMOPA The service is particularly keen that those aussucht, the “in itself visible.” Those companies corporations and, therefore, against the relatively easy and without much effort himself, inconsistencies, etc. can be done in terms of the even crimes such as cheating and Erschwindeln Others can easily perform. It is well known that every company especially good at their presence and her name is inviolable. Each company will do everything according to their good presence also retain its credibility to be. But if the victim of GOMOPA and his “partner” and a large range of businesses, so it is possible to call such companies a quick, easy, and even considerably enriched. It appears at this point the question: Which clever criminals in the network and outside the network to me is success, it does not wish to benefit? The criminals in the network know that without business credibility there is no confidence that any business is essential. GOMOPA and all are cooperating with the security of all possible methods and measures mastered how to credibility and confidence of a company, a company, corporation (crime victims) in question. This moves just the attention of the user, so that the homepage of the GOMOPA http://www.gomopa.net in search engines like Google, Yahoo is easy to find. This, in turn, means nothing other than additional profits for the service GOMOPA because of its activity around a media discourse created wird. At first glance commonplace and easy victims of extortion, for example, can a public governmental body, which, based on the credibility of public works, such as a bank or a foreign bank financial institution. So it was with the foreign banks, international financial institution Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. the case. A simple and easy victims of illicit profits and material may include insurance companies, where – as it is from our search results, much to the criminal activities of the GOMOPA especially in the area of the Federal Republic of Germany, Switzerland and Austria was due. Among the known and identifiable victims is certainly German, Austrian and Swiss banks, insurance companies such as Allianz of Germany, German and Austrian companies such as HDI and DKV visible. This is what the service GOMOPA trust and what with the cooperating services, blogs nowadays practice is the so-called cyber-stalking, which rapidly spread in the network. The method is criminal at this point and others in the threat that the business of an enterprise (Ofer blackmail, threats and forcible ) fictitious, even non-existent information (lies, rumors, stories, statements, insults) on the net first then in other mass media. This is only used to a potential victim to move a considerable sum of money for the so-called “peace “the blackmailer available. The” quiet “here means the promise of access lock with respect to the fictitious publication of any information on the net and in all other mass media, the victims of extortion in extremely negative light showing. Such threats are, as already above the goal of companies – potential victims of cyber-stalking to do likewise, that they themselves “buy.” In short, GOMOPA and his peers, and cooperating with those services, and blogs, create a “virtual reality”, or otherwise said publishing fictitious information on potential victims of a crime. firms and corporations, against which threats and extortion by GOMOPA are not due, ie those who for so-called “peace” does not want to pay, to be victims of serious lies, insults, and Insinuationen other criminal misappropriations, the appearance and presence of a firm with certainty. One is a target of GOMOPA, namely as fast and as easy as it goes, money abzukassieren, and if a company refuses, and the “peace” do not buy wishes, it is unexpectedly and quickly become an object of extortion and defamation on the net. At this point the following question arises: How is it possible that the leader of the firm GOMOPA, Mr Klaus Maurischat, only in the Federal Republic of Germany on his account “23 court rulings, has for many years as an honest citizen to create, while other persons, firms, corporations criminal acts, offenses memorize, in addition to substantial sums of money could earn? This complex process can only be explained as follows: GOMOPA creates his appearance, his presence in the eyes of public opinion as an honest subject, against which pathological phenomena in the public and economic life einschreitet. GOMOPA and his partner (services, blogs) present themselves as followers of any Verbrechensart that promise so the fight against criminals in each virtual network ( especially against any cheaters, blackmailers). GOMOPA used in this respect a kind of “Merketingsvorhang” as a method of seduction, a result which is his true “face” and his true intentions than that of a fraudster and blackmail on money can hide. The true intentions of the GOMOPA, of working together GOMOPA Services and blogs were until today no doubt with success before the public opinion will remain hidden, especially thanks to the so-called “smoke curtain”, which reflects the fact that man himself as a “winner” of any abuse and any pathological appearance of the public and economic life in Aland German, Austria, Switzerland, the United States, Britain, Russia, Spain created. Next appears the GOMOPA forward by the person on which companies and corporations – the future victims of the crime that is – against the possibility of the release of extremely poor and the company concerned in a negative light visual information on the Internet and other mass media warns. The person from whom the speech is also informed that they are successful against such a procedure for a “fee” can be used. The GOMOPA is at this point up to the extortion of money for so-called “peace” to the company and corporation (the victim of a crime) around. Most of the companies concerned to such threats did not respond, because it’s everyday life and their agenda. It finally barely missing on the web of blackmail and outside of the medium. Normally so seldom so-called “understanding”, while on the one hand, the crime victim, on the other hand, the GOMOPA occurs. It is understandable that the price for such an “understanding” means the provision of the requested funds would GOMOPA. The financial blackmail in this stage is rarely enforced. The situation changes little, however, if the firms and corporations (crime victims) find that the threat was fulfilled. In Brief will appear on the homepage http://www.gomopa.net numerous newspaper articles, reports and bogus pseudo market analysis, both by GOMOPA as well as so-called “independent experts” and the company will be represented, with formal or fictitious GOMOPA together. Information published here, correspond to the contents of a threat and make the operations of firms and corporations in an extremely negative light dar. There is no doubt that such actions and methods only to harm the good name and good presence of these firms and corporations prerogatives. The activity of GOMOPA is certainly not exhausted. GOMOPA disseminated (published accommodates) the above information in the network by the credible, and popular opinion-operated services. Moreover, GOMOPA threatens the companies and corporations (its victims), that “from the finger-drawn” information not only on the network, but also on television and on radio and in the press landscape erscheinen.Wie the experience and expertise of the former Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. show that the services are usually not aware that they are for the purpose of a criminal action by the GOMOPA used. They agree with the corresponding fictitious publications, reports and analysis on what specifically GOMOPA through and through “independent” experts are prepared. It also states that the services, and blogs such cooperation with the GOMOPA approval, although they know that the information transmitted by GOMOPA are fictitious and the credibility of companies and corporations affect. They take so aware of the criminal procedure part. The explanation of this situation is quite simple. GOMOPA pays namely the services, and blogs related remuneration that the publication of false information on the companies and corporations (crime victims) agree. Some services, and blogs seem to know nothing about it to have that on their pages available information “fictitious” and “pulled out of the fingers are. Are you looking for in this way their conduct to justify, because they want the legal consequences of participating in the abuse of the good name and appearance of a company or corporation to escape. The activity system of GOMOPA of collaborating services and blogs was also the example of Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. tested. Beginning in October 2008 was one of the workers of Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. a message from an anonymous sender, in the near future – first on the Internet, then on television, radio and in the German press – information published by the functioning and activities of Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. in an extremely negative light show. The employee of Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. was then informed that these reports / news undoubtedly significantly the appearance and the reputation of the firm Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. affect. The place mentioned in this “conversation partner” has the workers of Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. informed that the possibility of the embarrassing situation to be avoided by Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. to the person shown by the account the sum of 100,000.00 EUR transfers. As later revealed, however, was Mr. Klaus Mauri Chat – this anonymous interlocutor – “brain” and “Leader of the GOMOPA”. The investigations have been employed by the Federal Judicial Police (tracking and identifying the body at the federal level) during the investigation for the payment of blackmail, fraud and threats because of what Mr Mauri chatting and his staff were practiced, and for participation by other (head of Internet services and moderators of blogs) on this process. These crimes have been committed to loss of many professional and judicial persons, including the Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. The victims of this crime in Germany, Austria, Switzerland, Spain, Portugal, Great Britain, the USA and Canada visible. At this moment appeared the following question: What was the reaction of Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. to the demands from GOMOPA? Corresponded to the response to the expectations of GOMOPA? Has the Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. the required sum of EUR 100,000.00 paid? Side of Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. There was absolutely no reaction to the extortion attempt by GOMOPA. At the end of August 2008 on the Service http://www.gompa.net numerous articles / reports published by the activities of Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. in a very negative light have represented. Once the information contained on http://www.gomopa.net detail and were fully analyzed, it is that they are not even the truth at one point and potential and existing customers of Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. in relation to the financial institution from this discontinued business activities is misleading. Following the criminal Handlugen of GOMOPA and its cooperating services, and blogs on the network, the Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. measurable and significant business losses. The Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. has primarily an important group of potential customers lost. But what it showed as important, the existing customers of Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. little away. Those customers have used our services and continue to use the still. In view of the existing collaboration with the Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.., Which will in turn be no objections. GOMOPA has such a course of events accurately predicted, which aims significant and measurable business by Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. losses were suffered. The course of events, the service GOMOPA certainly pleased. GOMOPA has to expect that the position of Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. declines and the financial institution, the required sum (100.000,00 EUR) provides. Over time, as the whole procedure in the network was becoming more popular, tried GOMOPA still four times to the Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. Contacts, each time by adjusting these criminal “Kompanie” has promised, although it every time his financial demands heraufsetzte. The last of the set of “company” against Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. ratio was even planned EUR 5,000,000.00 (in words: EURO fünfmilionen). The Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. could but before the ever-increasing demands from the Service GOMOPA claim. In October 2008 met the management of Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. Decision on the notification of the INTERPOL International Police and the appropriate law enforcement institutions of the FRG (the police and the prosecutor) about the existing situation. In the meantime, reported at the Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. numerous companies and corporations, and even professional person such as doctors, judges, priests, actors and other people from different countries of the world, the extortion of GOMOPA relented and the required amounts of money it had. These people already gave statements that they have done so, so they finally just “be in peace” and unnecessary problems, difficulties, and a reasonable conclusion hardly avoid them. The victims of this criminal action, the Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. using different amounts of money which were requested, informed. In one case, there were relatively small (a few thousand EURO), in another case it has to deliver significant amounts (around few million EURO). Additionally turned to Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. Companies which have not yet GOMOPA the “fee” on out and have already considered whether they should do or not. These firms anticipated by Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. a clear opinion as well as a practical professional advice on how to be in such a situation should behave and how they can avoid debt. The Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. has invariably victims of all crimes, which are at our company have made a cooperation proposed. The top task is to this cooperation, jointly determined and effective measures against GOMOPA against other services in the network, and against all Bloggers to meet in the here described with international criminal procedure GOMOPA leaders to participate. All these companies were known as the Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. proposed “crusade” against GOMOPA, his partner. At our request to notify all participating companies the INTERPOL International Police and their pursuit of domestic institutions, including the competent public prosecutor and the police authorities about the existing situation. In view of the fact that the criminal act of GOMOPA be extended over many states and that the number of the Federal Republic of Germany because the ads reimbursed by GOMOPA, Internet Services and Bloggers crimes, grew up fast – which no doubt influenced by a far-reaching impact of criminal of GOMOPA testifies – International Business, the Police INTERPOL Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. before that its representatives in Berlin with representatives from GOMOPA true to the “payment arrangements and transfer the sum of EUR 5,000,000.00 to discuss. This step meant a well thought-out and by the Federal Criminal Police organized the event to carry out aimed at the arrest of international criminals GOMOPA acting was. The coordinated steps and measures of Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. Damaged and others, led by the International Economic Police INTERPOL, the Federal Criminal Police Office and the Prosecutor of the Federal Republic of Germany for education, training and implementation of the above-described case contributed. In November 2008, the event in Berlin prepared for the apprehension and arrest of the representative of the GOMOPA, after the arrest of Mr. Klaus Mauri chat – as the main leaders and leaders of international criminal group GOMOPA recalled. The arrest and notified the Federal Criminal Police showed both the current whereabouts of Mr. Klaus Mauri chat. “Brain” and the founder of this international criminal group GOMOPA, Mr Klaus Mauri chat on the same day was also arrested and imprisoned on time, will soon put in charge state, the responsibility for their own crimes and those of the forum, before a competent GOMOPA Federal wear. The Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. undertook all possible steps to ensure that Mr. Klaus Mauri chatting on the dock of the competent court of the United Kingdom of Great Britain appears. Among the damaged work and justice people from United Kingdom, along with the Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. There are many victims of GOMOPA: The beginning of the arrests with such a scale means for the German judiciary and a major breakthrough point. It is worth noting that the prosecution bodies of the Federal Republic, up to this stage of the long-standing criminal activity of Mr. Klaus Mauri chatting and his staff were powerless. Prolonged impunity of the criminal actions of Mr. Klaus Mauri chat, for years the “first violin” in GOMOPA played, is to end gegangen.An this point another question arises: how is it so go on? The arrest of Mr. Klaus chat Mauri is a critical moment, in other words a “turn around 180 degrees” for him personally. But it also means the beginning of the end “for its employees, for Internet Services, Bloggers, with GOMOPA so happy and had worked together without contradiction. There is no doubt that the cause of Mr Klaus Mauri chat at the top of the “iceberg” is. The above-mentioned turning point on this issue will be further arrests and detentions of members GOMOPA bring with them, and all persons from all areas involved in this transnational criminal actions have taken part. For information (reports by the end of December 2008), which of Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. available, the result that the next arrests currently prepared to be associated with the Services GOMOPA cooperating persons. This is to people outside Germany – from where Mr Klaus Mauri chat coming – refer. The details may be at this point in terms of legal and course of the prosecution bodies of the BRG and the Interpol-led investigation can not be betrayed. The Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. currently can only illustrate information from the investigation led the public to the criminal liability not to have this moment wird.In so intense preparations for the arrest of a number of persons outside the Federal Republic of Germany. This applies particularly to countries such as the following: – Russia-Ukraine – Poland – Spain – Mexico – Portugal – Brazil – the United States of America – Canada – UK – Ireland – Australia – New Zealand – India. All professional and judicial persons, regardless of the country in which they accompany the Office, or its citizens, and until now, consciously or unconsciously with the Forum GOMOPA together, or continue to work together to arouse the suspicion of the INTERPOL International Police. This works with the police criminal investigation department in each country, to the above persons first identify and then to legally pursue them. Information about this topic, as well as on the beginning and end of the activity of the GOMOPA can be at the following addresses on the Web at: http://gomopaabzocker.wordpress.com/ – http://www.nepper-schlepper-bauernfaenger.com – http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qNpzAu-QMuE – http://www.korte.de/alexander/2006/01/gomopa-finanforum-kritik.html- http://evelux.de/gomopa-sam-240/- http://blog.deobald.org/archive/2007/07/01/betrugsvorwurf-gomopa-spam/ 2. Dubai KLP Group Emirates – United Arab Emirates. As head of the company is Mr Martin Kraeter, not only as the “brain” of the whole company, but also as a longstanding friend of Mr Klaus Mauri Chat (GOMOPA-wire) acts. This company wants to hide and not even officially exist, that they as a strategic partner of the GOMOPA in the area of the Middle East, according to the territory of the Persian coast operates. Official activities of the company KLP Group Emirates includes among others the following areas: financial advisory services from the offshore area (Management Services – Facilitators – OffshoreConsultants, International Tax & Legal Consultants – Fiduciaries). In the sphere of activities of the Company will include the creation of companies and enterprises in the so-called “tax havens” to the tax liability to the company activity entfliehen.Inoffizielle KLP Group Emirates includes cooperation with the Service GOMOPA in the field of “Gelwäsche”. The monies are a result of criminal activity by GOMOPA generated by advanced professional and judicial persons soon throughout the world and legalized. The illegality based on the activity of the company KLP Group Emirates, as well as the cooperation with the Services GOMOPA attracted attention even when the prosecution organs of the United Kingdom of Great Britain, especially in Scotland Yard, which on this issue an intensive investigation has begun, which is in the ” development phase is located. It must be noted that all professional and judicial persons, but especially the clients of the company KLP Group Emirates, with the company KLP Group Emirates have cooperated in the past and still do, under the “Lupp” of Scotland Yard to be .3. Russlanda) The Company E-XECUTIVE by the Lord led Novosartow Vilen. On the homepage of the Company contained information comes directly from the company GOMOPA. The company e XECUTIVE leads the close cooperation not only with GOMOPA, but also with another on the Russian territory under the name of OOO UK broker functioning company. The company e XECUTIVE in connection with the company OOO UK broker is a member of a criminal group led by GOMOPA. The company e XECUTIVE GOMOPA representing interests in Russia and Central-Eastern Europe. Unofficially, the company employs E XECUTIVE-especially with the search for potential “victims” of the Erschwindelns, blackmail and forcing the funds for GOMOPA companies and corporations from the territory of Russia, Ukraine, and from all countries in Central Eastern Europe. Officially, the company e XECUTIVE one to the forum GOMOPA similar industrial activity. b) OOO “UK broker.” Head of the firm is Mr. Pavel Kokarev. This company is not concealed, that they are consistent with the Forum GOMOPA cooperates. The company OOO UK broker represents GOMOPA in Central Eastern Europe, including Russia. You shall be officially transferred to this area the GOMOPA similar activity, but unofficially it is to search for potential “victims” of racketeering, fraud and Erschwindelns for GOMOPA employed. The company has remained until now spared from any punishment, it could with “eternal impunity” because of a poorly developed, corrupt legal system in Russia expected. The situation may change after Mr. Klaus Mauri Chat arrested in Berlin and was arrested. This constant offenders, the “on his account” a set of legally enforceable judgments has, until now his freedom has unlimited recover, the do not know quite what it means to be arrested, begins gradually, according to our available information to finally “to bear witness.” This is understandable when one considers the threat of a penalty he considered. This delinquent shows growing interest in cooperation with the German tracking and identifying bodies. So there is a chance that other people he unveiled to the public by providing for reduction of prison sentence counts. It is also the only question of time INTERPOL, in cooperation with the Russian Service (FSB) of the Company OOO UK broker “at the door knocking”, which by Mr. Pavle Kokarev and represented. The company OOO UK broker has a virtual office in REGUS building in Moscow, is not even a person, forming a typical one-person company, which all business “crimes” may be the name of it, with no civil liability to pay. The Lord Pavel Kokarev seems to have forgotten or do not have sufficient knowledge about its possible responsibility fier to participate in the international crimes under the direction of Gomopa.
Sincerely yours
Magister Bernd Pulch
Become a Patron!
True Information is the most valuable resource and we ask you to give back.
On our request the German criminal police (Kriminalpolizei) has opened new cases against the notorious “GoMoPa” organisation which already fled in the underground. Insiders say they have killed German journalist and watchdog Heinz Gerlach and their criminal record is bigger than the Encyclopedia – Britannica
The case is also directed against Google, Germany, whilst supporting criminal action of “GoMoPa” for years and therefore give them the chance to blackmail successfull businessman. This case is therefore an example and will be followed by many others as far as we can project. Furthermore we will bring the case to the attention of the German lawyers community which will not tolerate such misconduct by Googles German legal representative Dr. Arndt Haller and we will bring the case to the attention of Google Inc in Mountain View, USA, and the American ministry of Justice to stop the Cyberstalkers once and for all.
Besides that many legal institutions, individuals and firms have already contacted us to help to clarify the death of Mr. Heinz Gerlach and to prosecute his murderers and their backers.
The case number is ST/0148943/2011
In a series of interviews beginning 11 months before the sudden death of German watchdog Heinz Gerlach Berlin lawyer Joschen Resch unveilved secrets of Gerlach, insiders say. Secret documents from Mr Gerlachs computer were published on two dubious hostile German websites. Both have a lot of similarities in their internet registration. One the notorious “GoMoPa” website belongs to a n Eastern German organization which calls itself “
Numerous attempts have been made to stop our research and the publication of the stories by “GoMoPa” members in camouflage thus confirming the truth and the substance of it in a superior way.
Only two articles let the German audience believe that the famous journalist and watchdog Heinz Gerlach died on natural courses by blood pollution. The first one, published only hours after the death of Mr Heinz Gerlach by the notorious “GoMoPa” (see article below) and a second 3 days later by a small German local newspaper, Weserbergland Nachrichten.
Many people including the hostile Gerlach website “Akte Heinz Gerlach” doubted that this man who had so many enemies and friends would die of natural causes without any previous warning. Rumours occured that Mr. Gerlach’s doctor doubted natural courses at all. After many critical voices discussed the issue a small website of a small German local newspaper – which never before had reported about Mr. Heinz Gerlach and which is not even in the region of Mr Gerlachs home – published that Mr Gerlach died of blood pollution. Weserbergland-Nachrichten published a long article about the deadly consequences of blood pollution and did not even name the source of such an important statement. It claimed only that somebody of Gerlachs inner circle had said this. It is a proven fact that after the collpase of the Eastern German Communist Regime many former Communist propaganda agents went to regional newspapers – often in Western Germany like Günther Schabowski did the man who opened the “Mauer”.
The theatre stage was set: One day later the hostile Gerlach website “Akte Heinz Gerlach” took the agenda publishing that Mr Gerlach had died for natural causes without any further research at all.
This was done by a website which for months and months and months reported everything about Mr. Gerlach.
Furthermore a research proves that the technical details regarding the website hosting of this hostile website “Akte Heinz Gerlach” proves that there are common details with the hosting of “GoMoPa” and their affiliates as proven by the SJB-GoMoPa-victims (see http://www.sjb-fonds-opfer.com)
Insiders believe that the murderers of Mr. Heinz Gerlach are former members of the Eastern German Terror Organisation “Stasi” with dioxins. They also believe that “GoMoPa” was part of the plot. At “GoMoPa”’ a person named Siegfried Siewers was officialy responsible for the press but never appeared in public. “GoMoPa”-victims say that this name was a cameo for “GoMoPa” frontrunner Klaus Maurischat who is controlled by the Stasi Top Agent Ehrenfried Stelzner, Berlin.
Siegfried Sievers, a former Stasi member is responsible for the pollution of millions Germanys for many years with dioxins. This was unveiled at 5th of January 2011 by German prosecutors.
The victims say that Maurischat (probably also a Stasi cameo) and Sievers were in contact as Sievers acted as Stasi Agent and was in fact already a specialist in dioxins under the Communist Terror Regime in Eastern Germany.
Furthermore the Stasi Top Agent Ehrenfried Stelzer disguised as Professor for Criminal studies during the Communist Regime at the Eastern Berlin Humboldt University.
Background:
The man behind the Berlin lawyer Jochen Resch and his activities is Ehrenfried Stelzer, former Stasi Top officer in Berlin and “Professor for Criminal Studies” at the Eastern Berlin Humboldt University during the Communist regime, the SJB-GoMoPa-victims say (www.sjb-fonds-opfer.com) is responsable for the killing of German watchdog and journalist Heinz Gerlach.
These informations stem from various sources who were close to the criminal organization of GoMoPa in the last years. The SJB-GoMoPa say that the well-known German watchdog and journalist Heinz Gerlach was killed by former Stasi members with dioxins. Polychlorinated dibenzodioxins (PCDDs), or simply dioxins, are a group of organic polyhalogenated compounds that are significant because they act as environmental pollutants. They are commonly referred to as dioxins for simplicity in scientific publications because every PCDD molecule contains a dioxin skeletal structure. Typically, the p-dioxin skeleton is at the core of a PCDD molecule, giving the molecule a dibenzo-p-dioxin ring system. Members of the PCDD family have been shown to bioaccumulate in humans and wildlife due to their lipophilic properties, and are known teratogens, mutagens, and confirmed (avered) human carcinogens. They are organic compounds.
Dioxins build up primarily in fatty tissues over time (bioaccumulate), so even small exposures may eventually reach dangerous levels. In 1994, the US EPA reported that dioxins are a probable carcinogen, but noted that non-cancer effects (reproduction and sexual development, immune system) may pose an even greater threat to human health. TCDD, the most toxic of the dibenzodioxins, is classified as a Group 1 carcinogen by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC).
In 2004, a notable individual case of dioxin poisoning, Ukrainian politician Viktor Yushchenko was exposed to the second-largest measured dose of dioxins, according to the reports of the physicians responsible for diagnosing him. This is the first known case of a single high dose of TCDD dioxin poisoning, and was diagnosed only after a toxicologist recognized the symptoms of chloracne while viewing television news coverage of his condition.
German dioxin scandal: In January 2011 about 4700 German farms were banned from making deliveries after tests at the Harles und Jentzsch plant in the state of Schleswig-Holstein showed high levels of dioxin. Again this incident appears to involve PCBs and not PCDDs at all. Dioxin were found in animal feed and eggs in many farms. The person who is responsible for this, Siegfried Sievert is also a former Stasi Agent. At “GoMoPa” the notorious Eastern-Berlin press agency (see article below) one of the henchmen acted under the name of “Siegfried Siewert”.
Further evidence for the killing of Mr.Heinz Gerlach is provided by the SJB-GoMoPa-victims by analyzing the dubious role of former Stasi-Top-agent Ehrenfried Stelzer, also a former “Professor for Crime Studies” under the Communist regime in Eastern Germany and the dubious role of “detective” Medard Fuchsgruber. Both are closely tied to the dubious “GoMoPa” and Berlin lawyer Jochen Resch.
According to the SJB-GoMoPa-victims is Berlin lawyer Jochen Resch the mastermind of the criminal organization “GoMoPa2. The victims state that they have a source inside “GoMoPa” who helped them discover the shocking truth. The so-called “Deep Throat from Berlin” has information that Resch had the idea to found the criminal organization “GoMoPa” and use non-existing Jewish lawyers named Goldman, Morgenstern & Partner as camouflage. Their “office” in Madison Avenue, New York, is a mailbox. This is witnessed by a German Ex-Patriot, a lawyer, whose father, Heinz Gerlach, died under strange circumstances.
Resch seems to use “GoMoPa” as an instrument to blackmail parts of the German Property and Investment segment.
Become a Patron!
True Information is the most valuable resource and we ask you to give back.
A German Source says: Inform yourself about Berlin Lawyer Jochen Resch and whether the so-called “institutions to protect the investors” are a scam….
And which rolle plays the so-called “NACHRICHTENDIENST” “GoMoPa” ?
Überprüfen Sie selbst die allgemein zugänglichen Informationen die hier zusammengestellt sind und machen sich selbst ein Bild über
1. Die Rechtsanwaltskanzlei Resch und Kollegen aus Berlin und ihren Gründer Rechtsanwalt Jochen Resch
2. Dem Deutschen Institut für Anlegerschutz e.V., kurz DIAS e.V. und ihren Vorständen sowie ihrem Gründer Rechtsanwalt Jochen Resch, der den Verein in den Kanzleiräumen der Rechtsanwaltskanzlei Resch und Kollegen gründete
3. Die Schutzgemeinschaft für geschädige Kapitalanleger e.V. und ihrem ehemaligen Vorstand Rechtsanwalt Jochen Resch sowie dem nachfolgenden Vorstand mit Stasivergangenheit.
Die Rechtsanwaltskanzlei Resch und ihr Gründer Rechtsanwalt Jochen Resch sind in den uns vorliegenden Dokumenten oben stehender Vereine oder “Verbraucherschutzinstitutionen” als Gründer, Initiator und Geldgeber, genannt.
Vor diesem Hintergrund haben sich bereits namhafte Journalisten die Frage gestellt:
“Dienen diese Institutionen, die in der Aussenwahrnehmung als unabhängig und verbrauchernah gelten, als triviales Mandantenfang-Instrumentarium?
Und welche Rolle spielt dabei der selbsternannte “NACHRICHTENDIENST” “GoMoPa” ?
Become a Patron!
True Information is the most valuable resource and we ask you to give back.
A German Source says: Inform yourself about Berlin Lawyer Jochen Resch and whether the so-called “institutions to protect the investors” are a scam….
And which rolle plays the so-called “NACHRICHTENDIENST” “GoMoPa” ?
Überprüfen Sie selbst die allgemein zugänglichen Informationen die hier zusammengestellt sind und machen sich selbst ein Bild über
1. Die Rechtsanwaltskanzlei Resch und Kollegen aus Berlin und ihren Gründer Rechtsanwalt Jochen Resch
2. Dem Deutschen Institut für Anlegerschutz e.V., kurz DIAS e.V. und ihren Vorständen sowie ihrem Gründer Rechtsanwalt Jochen Resch, der den Verein in den Kanzleiräumen der Rechtsanwaltskanzlei Resch und Kollegen gründete
3. Die Schutzgemeinschaft für geschädige Kapitalanleger e.V. und ihrem ehemaligen Vorstand Rechtsanwalt Jochen Resch sowie dem nachfolgenden Vorstand mit Stasivergangenheit.
Die Rechtsanwaltskanzlei Resch und ihr Gründer Rechtsanwalt Jochen Resch sind in den uns vorliegenden Dokumenten oben stehender Vereine oder “Verbraucherschutzinstitutionen” als Gründer, Initiator und Geldgeber, genannt.
Vor diesem Hintergrund haben sich bereits namhafte Journalisten die Frage gestellt:
“Dienen diese Institutionen, die in der Aussenwahrnehmung als unabhängig und verbrauchernah gelten, als triviales Mandantenfang-Instrumentarium?
Und welche Rolle spielt dabei der selbsternannte “NACHRICHTENDIENST” “GoMoPa” ?
Become a Patron!
True Information is the most valuable resource and we ask you to give back.
Dear readers,
on our request the German criminal police (Kriminalpolizei) has opened new cases against the notorious “GoMoPa” organisation which already fled in the underground. Insiders say they have killed German journalist and watchdog Heinz Gerlach and their criminal record is bigger than the
The case is also directed against Google, Germany, whilst supporting criminal action of “GoMoPa” for years and therefore give them the chance to blackmail successfull businessman. This case is therefore an example and will be followed by many others as far as we can project. Furthermore we will bring the case to the attention of the German lawyers community which will not tolerate such misconduct by Googles German legal representative Dr. Arndt Haller and we will bring the case to the attention of Google Inc in Mountain View, USA, and the American ministry of Justice to stop the Cyberstalkers once and for all.
Besides that many legal institutions, individuals and firms have already contacted us to help to clarify the death of Mr. Heinz Gerlach and to prosecute his murderers and their backers.
The case number is
ST/0148943/2011 My warmest regards Bernd Pulch
Become a Patron!
True Information is the most valuable resource and we ask you to give back.
Dear Readers,
we herewith unveil a new member of the StasiPlot- lawyer “RA Spoehring”, a former member of the Communist “Kampfeinheiten” from Dresden is spreading false rumours.
We have unveiled a corruption scandal in Frankfurt. The material came from the Turkish broker Gürcan Özkan.
Özkan tried to blackmail Mr Ardi Goldman with this material.
We did not support this
All the documents about this have already been published in IMMOBILIEN VERTRAULICH and can be publsihed again immemdiately to prove our honesty against weird Stasi-liars.
This again shows that the last articles shocked the old Stasi-network totally.
Furthermore: Our team has clairfied that this dubious “lawyer” from Dresden is indeed the same person who acted as “Maurischat” or Siegfried Siewert” on behalf on GoMoPa.
Sincerely yours
Magister Bernd Pulch
London
Become a Patron!
True Information is the most valuable resource and we ask you to give back.
Sehr geehrte Damen und Herren,
über eine selbstgebaute Blogseite verbreiten die GoMoPa-Gangster eine gefälschte Stellung von Meridian Capital, um Verwirrung zu stiften.
Diese Blogseite existiert erst seit Deztember 2010.
Beweis:
http://www.hypestat.com/pressreleaser.org
Die Meridian Capital-Seite, das Original,
http://othergomopa.blogspot.com/
ist dagegen bereits seit2009 online
Beweis: Aussage Meridian Capital
und
Source: http://klaus-dieter-maurischat.blogspot.com/2009/01/klaus-dieter-maurischat-in-haft.html
Gerne stehe ich Ihnen für weitere Rückfragen jederzeit zur Verfügung.
Mit freundlichen Grüssen
Magister Bernd Pulch
London
Become a Patron!
True Information is the most valuable resource and we ask you to give back.
Did the Saudi state plan the assassination of Jamal Khashoggi? Was Khashoggi so much of a threat to the Saudi regime that it was prepared to commit a terrible crime to get rid of him? This documentary reconstructs Jamal Khashoggi’s personal plans and movements in his final days.
It also examines records, leaks and reports related to his assassination, as well as motivations that may have led Saudi Arabia to commit such a shocking crime. The film’s key feature is exclusive testimony from Khashoggi’s close circle, including from his fiancée Hatice Cengiz.
She tells of her emotional struggle in dealing with his death; hoping against hope he was still alive despite accounts of how he was killed; the struggle to discover his fate; and the pain of not knowing where his body is. The documentary also uncovers how the Saudi government handed the incident, including the attempts it made to cover up the story. In London, Washington, Istanbul and Montreal, the film visits and speaks with Khashoggi’s friends, security experts, analysts and activists.
The events surrounding Khashoggi’s killing and the assassination itself are reconstructed in reenactments and with aerial photographs, graphics and animations, including archive footage. In the words of one official close to the case, UN Special Rapporteur Agnès Callamard: “There is credible evidence that requires further investigation into the involvement of senior Saudi officials in the crime, including the Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman himself.”
Become a Patron!
True Information is the most valuable resource and we ask you to give back.
A Russian television journalist who had reported from the turbulent North Caucasus region was found strangled in his Moscow apartment on Friday, prosecutors said.
Police said the body of Ilyas Shurpayev, 32, was found by firefighters when they arrived to put out a fire in his apartment. They said it appeared Shurpayev was strangled with a belt and his attackers set his apartment on fire before leaving.
Shurpayev had moved to Moscow from Dagestan, a crime-ridden southern province neighboring Chechnya where he worked for several years as a reporter with state-controlled Channel One television.
Shurpayev reported from many conflict zones in the former Soviet Union including Chechnya and Georgia’s breakaway regions of Abkhazia and South Ossetia.
A spokesman for the investigations committee of the Prosecutor-General’s office said several theories for Shurpayev’s murder were being checked, including those related to his personal life and his work.
“Apparently the journalist knew his murderer because he opened the door for him and let him in,” the spokesman said.
Russian media reported that a concierge in the apartment block where Shurpayev lived had seen the last person to visit him.
More than a dozen journalists have been slain in contract-style killings in Russia since 2000. Many journalists appear to have been targeted for beatings and killings because of their attempts to dig into allegations of corruption.
Shurpayev was not known as an investigative reporter.
Several hours before his death he posted an entry on his personal Internet blog, http://www.shurpaev.livejournal.com, saying he had been included in a black list of journalists barred from contributing to an unnamed Dagestani newspaper.
“Now I am a dissident! What nonsense!”, wrote Shurpayev, who said he had published only travel reports in the paper.
“I have not participated in the political life of my republic or even my district because I am too lazy and have no time,” he wrote.
Become a Patron!
True Information is the most valuable resource and we ask you to give back.
Only two articles let the German audience believe that the famous journalist and watchdog Heinz Gerlach died on natural courses by blood pollution. The first one, published only hours after the death of Mr Heinz Gerlach by the notorious “GoMoPa” (see article below) and a second 3 days later by a small German local newspaper, Weserbergland Nachrichten.
Many people including the hostile Gerlach website “Akte Heinz Gerlach” doubted that this man who had so many enemies and friends would die of natural causes without any previous warning. Rumours occured that Mr. Gerlach’s doctor doubted natural courses at all. After many critical voices discussed the issue a small website of a small German local newspaper – which never before had reported about Mr. Heinz Gerlach and which is not even in the region of Mr Gerlachs home – published that Mr Gerlach died of blood pollution. Weserbergland-Nachrichten published a long article about the deadly consequences of blood pollution and did not even name the source of such an important statement. It claimed only that somebody of Gerlachs inner circle had said this. It is a proven fact that after the collpase of the Eastern German Communist Regime many former Communist propaganda agents went to regional newspapers – often in Western Germany like Günther Schabowski did the man who opened the “Mauer”.
The theatre stage was set: One day later the hostile Gerlach website “Akte Heinz Gerlach” took the agenda publishing that Mr Gerlach had died for natural causes without any further research at all.
This was done by a website which for months and months and months reported everything about Mr. Gerlach.
Furthermore a research proves that the technical details regarding the website hosting of this hostile website “Akte Heinz Gerlach” proves that there are common details with the hosting of “GoMoPa” and their affiliates as proven by the SJB-GoMoPa-victims (see www.sjb-fonds-opfer.com)
Insiders believe that the murderers of Mr. Heinz Gerlach are former members of the Eastern German Terror Organisation “Stasi” with dioxins. They also believe that “GoMoPa” was part of the plot. At “GoMoPa”’ a person named Siegfried Siewers was officialy responsible for the press but never appeared in public. “GoMoPa”-victims say that this name was a cameo for “GoMoPa” frontrunner Klaus Maurischat who is controlled by the Stasi Top Agent Ehrenfried Stelzner, Berlin.
Siegfried Sievers, a former Stasi member is responsible for the pollution of millions Germanys for many years with dioxins. This was unveiled at 5th of January 2011 by German prosecutors.
The victims say that Maurischat (probably also a Stasi cameo) and Sievers were in contact as Sievers acted as Stasi Agent and was in fact already a specialist in dioxins under the Communist Terror Regime in Eastern Germany.
Furthermore the Stasi Top Agent Ehrenfried Stelzer disguised as Professor for Criminal studies during the Communist Regime at the Eastern Berlin Humboldt University.
Background:
The man behind the Berlin lawyer Jochen Resch and his activities is Ehrenfried Stelzer, former Stasi Top officer in Berlin and “Professor for Criminal Studies” at the Eastern Berlin Humboldt University during the Communist regime, the SJB-GoMoPa-victims say (www.sjb-fonds-opfer.com) is responsable for the killing of German watchdog and journalist Heinz Gerlach.
These informations stem from various sources who were close to the criminal organization of GoMoPa in the last years. The SJB-GoMoPa say that the well-known German watchdog and journalist Heinz Gerlach was killed by former Stasi members with dioxins. Polychlorinated dibenzodioxins (PCDDs), or simply dioxins, are a group of organic polyhalogenated compounds that are significant because they act as environmental pollutants. They are commonly referred to as dioxins for simplicity in scientific publications because every PCDD molecule contains a dioxin skeletal structure. Typically, the p-dioxin skeleton is at the core of a PCDD molecule, giving the molecule a dibenzo-p-dioxin ring system. Members of the PCDD family have been shown to bioaccumulate in humans and wildlife due to their lipophilic properties, and are known teratogens, mutagens, and confirmed (avered) human carcinogens. They are organic compounds.
Dioxins build up primarily in fatty tissues over time (bioaccumulate), so even small exposures may eventually reach dangerous levels. In 1994, the US EPA reported that dioxins are a probable carcinogen, but noted that non-cancer effects (reproduction and sexual development, immune system) may pose an even greater threat to human health. TCDD, the most toxic of the dibenzodioxins, is classified as a Group 1 carcinogen by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC).
In 2004, a notable individual case of dioxin poisoning, Ukrainian politician Viktor Yushchenko was exposed to the second-largest measured dose of dioxins, according to the reports of the physicians responsible for diagnosing him. This is the first known case of a single high dose of TCDD dioxin poisoning, and was diagnosed only after a toxicologist recognized the symptoms of chloracne while viewing television news coverage of his condition.
German dioxin scandal: In January 2011 about 4700 German farms were banned from making deliveries after tests at the Harles und Jentzsch plant in the state of Schleswig-Holstein showed high levels of dioxin. Again this incident appears to involve PCBs and not PCDDs at all. Dioxin were found in animal feed and eggs in many farms. The person who is responsible for this, Siegfried Sievert is also a former Stasi Agent. At “GoMoPa” the notorious Eastern-Berlin press agency (see article below) one of the henchmen acted under the name of “Siegfried Siewert”.
Further evidence for the killing of Mr.Heinz Gerlach is provided by the SJB-GoMoPa-victims by analyzing the dubious role of former Stasi-Top-agent Ehrenfried Stelzer, also a former “Professor for Crime Studies” under the Communist regime in Eastern Germany and the dubious role of “detective” Medard Fuchsgruber. Both are closely tied to the dubious “GoMoPa” and Berlin lawyer Jochen Resch.
According to the SJB-GoMoPa-victims is Berlin lawyer Jochen Resch the mastermind of the criminal organization “GoMoPa2. The victims state that they have a source inside “GoMoPa” who helped them discover the shocking truth. The so-called “Deep Throat from Berlin” has information that Resch had the idea to found the criminal organization “GoMoPa” and use non-existing Jewish lawyers named Goldman, Morgenstern & Partner as camouflage. Their “office” in Madison Avenue, New York, is a mailbox. This is witnessed by a German Ex-Patriot, a lawyer, whose father, Heinz Gerlach, died under strange circumstances.
Resch seems to use “GoMoPa” as an instrument to blackmail parts of the German Property and Investment.
This a list of Reschs cases.
| ALLWO (Badenia Heinen & Biege) |
| B & V |
| BADENIA (Allwo, Heinen&Biege) |
| BAG, Hamm |
| BBI Beteiligungsgesellschaft Bayrische Immobilien |
| Beißer Gruppe |
| BEMA / OSPA |
| Betreutes Wohnen |
| BHW Bank, Hameln |
| Brentana Wohnbau |
| C & C CyberCooperation AG |
| dieser Eintrag wurde gelöscht |
| CFG Grundbesitz GmbH |
| Contest (heute CFG Grundbesitz GmbH) |
| Conzeptbau Bagge |
| DBVI Privatbank Reithinger |
| Dedimax (S&C Grund & Kapital) |
| DEGEWO |
| Deutscher Informationsdienst, Hannover |
| DM Beteiligungen AG |
| Dubai Invest Immobilienfonds GmbH & Co. KG / First Real Estate |
| Eagle Immobilien |
| EECH Gruppe |
| EURO Convent AG |
| EURO-Gruppe |
| Falk-Fonds |
| Finanz Concept GmbH |
| First Real Estate Grundbesitz GmbH |
| Fondax Beteiligungsfonds 1 |
| Fondax Beteiligungsfonds 2 |
| Fondax Capital – Select GmbH & Co.KG |
| Fortissimo |
| Forum IV GbR |
| Frankonia Sachwert AG (jetzt Deltoton) |
| FUNDUS – Gruppe |
| GABAU GmbH & Co.KG |
| Gallinat Bank, Essen |
| Global Real Estate |
| Göttinger Gruppe |
| Grüezi GmbH, Berlin |
| Grund & Boden |
| Hansa Grundinvest OHG |
| Hauser Wohnbau GmbH |
| HCC Fonds |
| Heberle & Kollegen, Rostock |
| Horst Bogatz |
| IBH – Immobilienfonds |
| ISP Internationaler Sachwert Plan |
| KK Royal Basement |
| Köllner |
| Madrixx AG, Berlin |
| Morena GmbH, Berlin |
| Papenburg Carré |
| Plan-Immofonds |
| Prime Estate GmbH, Berlin |
| Private Commercial Office – US Land Banking |
| Prokon |
| PS Haus – & Grundbesitzmarketing GmbH, Berlin |
| Quadro – Bau GmbH & Co. KG |
| R & R First Concept, Berlin |
| RB Real Estate |
| RCM Royal Capital Management, Berlin |
| Rentadomo |
| RJS Grundstück-u. Immobiliengesellschaft mbH |
| Rolf Albern Vermögensverwaltungs GmbH |
| S & C/ PK Multifonds |
| Securenta / Göttinger Gruppe / Langenbahn AG |
| Südwestrentaplus |
| Treuconcept |
| TREUCONSULT |
| UVBD |
| VEAG Immobilienfonds Nr. 298 KG |
| VermögensGarant AG |
| W K West Finanz Kapital Beteiligungs AG |
| WBG Leipzig-West |
| WHe Kommunalfonds Fürstenwalde KG |
| WI – RN GmbH |
| Wirtschaftskontor Berlin Kusch & Co. GmbH |
| WKVI, Düsseldorf |
| Wollenberg & Branke GmbH & Co KG |
Source: Stasi Victims
Become a Patron!
True Information is the most valuable resource and we ask you to give back.
My name is Bernd Pulch, I have studied and acquired the title Master (Magister) according to the academic laws.
Link to my Master’s thesis
http://www.kepplinger.de/search/node/pulch
and
http://www.kepplinger.de/node/50
I am the heir of the family bible and can therefore represent our family based on this authority .
Our family has and had many members who work and worked successfully as entrepreneurs, secretaries of state, banker, lawyers, farmers, politicians and also journalists.
We will prevent that our family name is violated by convicted criminals, cybermurderers and Neo-Nazis as well as former Stasi-Agents like the notorious”GoMoPa” which leaders have and had numerous convictions and stayed many years in jail.
The cybermurderers were hired to fight for criminal fraudsters and to cover their fraud. Now they even copy our documents and the documents of Meridian Capital to confuse our readers.
This will not work.
In order to keep my family safe we will not publish any private data as we have evidence that these people did in fact execute a murder.
The German journalist Heinz Gerlach died several months ago under strange circumstances and we believe that it is very strange that this happened at the same time when he published his informations against “GoMoPa” and ther backers.
Furthermore there is significant evidence that the circumstances of his death and the methods of “GoMoPa” are connected to the former Eastern-German Communist Terror Organisation “Stasi” as many of their victims can witness.
See
http://sjb-fonds-opfer.com/?page_id=11764
I will therefore prosecute these criminals with no mercy until their very end..
.
Magister Bernd Pulch
London
Become a Patron!
True Information is the most valuable resource and we ask you to give back.
Become a Patron!
True Information is the most valuable resource and we ask you to give back.
Become a Patron!
True Information is the most valuable resource and we ask you to give back.
An aspiring filmmaker narrates a highly complex story to a producer. As his story unfolds, we will find out if the narrator is successful in getting his story approved.
Starring Suhas & Sridhar
Directed by Filmian
Produced by Anurag & Sharath
Music by Karthik Rodriguez
Cinematography by Shreekar Khajandar
Editing by Pavan Kalyan
Become a Patron!
True Information is the most valuable resource and we ask you to give back.
©BERNDPULCH.ORG - GOOGLEFIRST.ORG - THE ONLY MEDIA WITH THE LICENSE TO SPY - YOU WILL SEE GOD IN ACTION - ABOVE TOP SECRET ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS - TRUSTED INFORMATION PUBLISHED AT RISK OF DEATH - CENSORED & SURPRESSED BY GOOGLE -ART - THE VOICE OF FREEDOM - NO PRESSTITUTION - NO FAIRY TALES - NO GATES OR SOROS FUNDING - NO PROJECT SYNDICATE - NO RELOTIUS - NO HITLER DIARIES - PARODY - SATIRE - PURE BLOOD - DONATIONS: www.berndpulch.org/donations 
You must be logged in to post a comment.