🤡

Text Martin Sonnenborn

In her post today, Ms. von der Leyen makes the claim that the Commission is bringing “European values” to the “digital world” with the Digital Services Act that has just come into force.

According to the Digital Services Act that has just come into force, we hereby report this fake content to the relevant regulatory and supervisory authorities of the EU, because the incriminated claim contains a deliberately misleading “disinformation” to the reader, which fuels his hatred of the EU in a significant way and is thus likely to endanger the asocial peace in Europe.

In reviewing all 54 articles of the fundamental rights of the European Union, laid down in the Charter of the same name, we have hardly come across an article that has not yet been violated by the von der Leyen Commission.

Ursula & Heiko von der Leyen

After a four-year field study of her official conduct, things come to mind that, in a stink-normal interpretation of the EU Charter, are to be judged as clear violations of fundamental rights – especially with regard to Article 41 “Right to good administration” (Lol!) as well as Article 42 “Right of access to documents” – and that “irrespective of the form of the media used for these documents”, which of course explicitly includes intimate short message traffic with pharmaceutical bosses via SMS.

With the introduction of the DSA pursued by the von der Leyen Commission, the following fundamental rights in particular are now at stake, in addition to a number of secondarily affected ones:

Art. 11 (1): Everyone has the right to freedom of expression. This right includes freedom of opinion and expression and freedom to receive and impart information and ideas without interference by public authority and regardless of frontiers.

Art. 11 (2): The freedom of the media and their plurality shall be respected.

Art. 10 (1): Everyone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion.

Art. 6: Everyone has the right to liberty and security.

Art. 7: Everyone has the right to respect for his private and family life, his home and his communications.

Art. 8 (1): Everyone has the right to the protection of personal data concerning him or her.

We would like to point out that with the DSA these vested “European values” are not moving in, but moving out on the Internet, because they are – from the right to freedom of thought and conscience, to the right to freedom of expression, to the freedom and plurality of the media – not only not contained in the mass criminalization of the exercise of freedoms protected by fundamental rights, but are also not contained in the (planned) mass surveillance (by means of chat control), but on the contrary are even smashed here with the very nastiest purposefulness.

We therefore forbid Ms. von der Leyen, of all people, to even mention the “European values” that she herself has distorted beyond recognition in office, even if only as a propaganda phrase devoid of content. And we are all the more opposed to their being linked to an EU regulation that has been carried out in obvious violation of fundamental rights and that demonstrably does not correspond in the least to “European values.

Instead, it would correspond to European values, if Mrs. von der Leyen would not only finally be held accountable for the violation of Art. 41 & 42 (see above).), but finally also for the fact that her official actions (both exemplarily in the DSA and summarily) fulfill the facts of Article 54 of the EU Charter “Prohibition of Abuse of Rights”, which states: “Nothing in this Charter shall be interpreted as conferring any right to engage in any activity or to perform any act aimed at the abolition of the rights and freedoms recognized in the Charter or at their restriction to a greater extent than is provided for in the Charter.”