Featured

The Albania Offshore & Tax Policy Index: 2024-2025 Update

THE OFFSHORE INDEX PROJECT HUB

Date: March 13, 2026
Source Compilation: Albanian Ministry of Finance, General Directorate of Taxation, PwC, KPMG, OECD, European Council, U.S. Department of State

Jump to Section

Part I: Executive Summary {#executive-summary}

This report provides a structured overview of the regulatory and tax landscape in Albania concerning offshore entities and jurisdictions. Albania has significantly updated its tax legislation with the introduction of Law No. 29/2023 “On Income Tax” , which became fully effective on January 1, 2024. This law aligns Albania’s tax system with European Union standards and international best practices .

Key Findings:

· Corporate Income Tax (CIT): The standard CIT rate in Albania is 15%. Resident corporations are taxed on their worldwide income, while non-resident entities are taxed on income sourced within Albania .
· Controlled Foreign Company (CFC) Rules: Albania introduced its first formal CFC rules through Law No. 29/2023. These rules currently apply primarily to natural persons who control foreign entities in low-tax jurisdictions, ensuring that undistributed profits are subject to Albanian tax .
· EU Alignment: Albania is recognized by the European Union as a cooperative jurisdiction. In February 2024, the EU removed Albania from its “grey list” (Annex II) after the country fulfilled its commitments to amend harmful tax regimes .
· Transfer Pricing: Albania has robust anti-avoidance provisions and transfer pricing regulations based on OECD guidelines. The tax administration can adjust transactions between “connected persons” that do not reflect an arm’s length price .
· Domestic Incentives: Albania offers sector-specific tax incentives, including reduced rates for software development (as low as 0-5%), agritourism (5%), and renewable energy investments .

Part II: Tax Framework & CFC Rules (Law No. 29/2023) {#part-i}

Corporate Income Tax (CIT)

Under Law No. 29/2023, which became fully effective on January 1, 2024, Albania’s tax system underwent significant modernization .

Tax Component Rate / Detail
Standard Corporate Income Tax Rate 15% (flat rate on taxable income)
Tax Base Worldwide income for residents; Albania-sourced income for non-residents
Withholding Tax (Dividends, Interest, Royalties) Varies by treaty; standard rates apply
Small Business Regime Simplified regime for businesses with turnover below certain thresholds

Controlled Foreign Company (CFC) Rules

Albania introduced its first formal CFC rules through Law No. 29/2023, marking a significant step in aligning with international tax standards .

· Scope: Currently applies primarily to natural persons who control foreign entities in low-tax jurisdictions.
· Mechanism: Undistributed profits of a controlled foreign entity are attributed to the Albanian resident controller and subject to Albanian CIT (15%) in the year they are earned, rather than when distributed as dividends.
· Low-Tax Jurisdiction Definition: A jurisdiction is considered low-tax if the effective tax rate paid by the foreign entity is less than 50% of the Albanian CIT rate (i.e., below 7.5%).
· Purpose: Prevents profit shifting and tax deferral through offshore structures in jurisdictions like the BVI, Cayman Islands, or other zero-tax havens.

Source: PwC, Tax at Hand

Part III: EU Alignment & Cooperative Jurisdiction Status {#part-ii}

Removal from EU Grey List (February 2024)

In a significant development, the European Union recognized Albania’s progress in tax governance by removing the country from its “grey list” (Annex II – Jurisdictions under active review) in February 2024 .

Timeline:

· February 20, 2024: EU ministers revised the list of non-cooperative jurisdictions, removing Albania after the country fulfilled its commitments to amend harmful tax regimes .
· Current Status: Albania is now considered a cooperative jurisdiction for EU tax purposes, enhancing its reputation for foreign investment and international financial relations.

EU Alignment Measures

Albania’s tax reform under Law No. 29/2023 incorporated several EU-directed changes:

· Elimination of harmful preferential tax regimes
· Enhanced transparency and exchange of information
· Adoption of anti-avoidance directives (ATAD) principles, including CFC rules and interest limitation rules
· Commitment to OECD Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS) standards

Source: European Council, Tax at Hand

Part IV: EU List of Non-Cooperative Jurisdictions (2024-2025) {#part-iii}

Albania follows the EU list of non-cooperative jurisdictions for tax purposes for its regulatory scrutiny. As of the latest updates in late 2024 and early 2025, the following jurisdictions are subject to enhanced monitoring and potential defensive tax measures by EU member states (including Albania in its bilateral relations).

EU Blacklist (Annex I) – February 2025 Update

The European Council updates the EU list of non-cooperative jurisdictions twice annually (February and October). As of the February 2025 update, the following jurisdictions are on the blacklist :

Jurisdiction Status Key Issues
American Samoa Non-cooperative Persistent on the EU blacklist; no commitment to international tax standards
Anguilla Non-cooperative Issues with exchange of information on request
Fiji Non-cooperative Harmful preferential tax regimes
Guam Non-cooperative No commitment to international tax standards
Palau Non-cooperative Issues with tax transparency
Panama Non-cooperative Concerns regarding the exchange of tax information
Russia Non-cooperative Added in 2023 due to harmful tax regimes and lack of cooperation
Samoa Non-cooperative Harmful preferential tax regime
Trinidad and Tobago Non-cooperative Non-compliance with transparency standards
US Virgin Islands Non-cooperative Harmful tax regimes
Vanuatu Non-cooperative Lack of transparency and exchange of information

Source: European Council (February 18, 2025)

Implications for Albanian Entities

For Albanian businesses and individuals operating in or transacting with these jurisdictions, enhanced scrutiny may include:

· Increased documentation requirements
· Application of defensive tax measures (e.g., higher withholding taxes, disallowance of deductions)
· CFC rule applicability if control thresholds are met

Part V: Domestic Tax Incentives and Preferential Regimes {#part-iv}

Albania offers several domestic incentives that, while not “offshore” in the traditional sense, provide a low-tax environment for specific sectors. These are designed to attract foreign direct investment and promote economic development.

Key Sectoral Incentives

Sector Incentive Legal Basis
Software Development Reduced CIT rate (often cited as 5% or 0% depending on specific criteria under the new law) Law No. 29/2023
Agritourism Reduced CIT rate of 5% Law No. 29/2023
Renewable Energy Tax incentives for investments in renewable energy sources Strategic Investment Law
Strategic Investments Customized tax breaks and administrative support for large-scale investments deemed “strategic” by the Albanian government Strategic Investment Law

Software Development Incentive

Qualified software development companies may benefit from a significantly reduced CIT rate. While specific criteria apply (e.g., revenue thresholds, employment requirements), this incentive aims to position Albania as a regional tech hub .

Agritourism

The agritourism sector, combining agriculture and tourism, benefits from a preferential 5% CIT rate to encourage rural development and sustainable tourism .

Strategic Investments

Large-scale investments (typically exceeding certain monetary thresholds and meeting job creation or regional development criteria) can be designated as “strategic” by the Albanian government. Such designation unlocks:

· Accelerated administrative procedures
· Customized tax incentives (including CIT reductions or exemptions)
· Support from the Albanian Investment Development Agency (AIDA)

Source: KPMG, U.S. Department of State

Part VI: Transfer Pricing & Anti-Avoidance Provisions {#part-v}

Transfer Pricing Framework

Albania has adopted transfer pricing regulations based on OECD Transfer Pricing Guidelines .

Component Detail
Legal Basis Law No. 29/2023 and implementing instructions
Arm’s Length Principle Transactions between “connected persons” must reflect market prices
Documentation Requirements Master file, local file, and Country-by-Country (CbC) reporting for qualifying multinational groups
Connected Persons Definition Includes relationships by control, family ties, or significant influence

Anti-Avoidance Rules

The tax administration has broad powers to challenge transactions lacking commercial substance or entered into primarily for tax avoidance purposes :

· Article 97 (Connected Persons): Authorizes adjustment of prices in related-party transactions that do not reflect an arm’s length arrangement.
· General Anti-Abuse Rule (GAAR): Allows recharacterization of transactions that are artificial or lack economic substance.
· CFC Rules (as described above): Targets income parked in low-tax jurisdictions.
· Interest Limitation Rules: Limits deductibility of borrowing costs (implementing EU ATAD standards).

Source: OECD, PwC

Summary Statistics {#summary}

Category Count / Value
Standard Corporate Income Tax Rate 15%
CFC Low-Tax Threshold <7.5% effective tax rate
EU Blacklist Jurisdictions (Feb 2025) 11 (American Samoa, Anguilla, Fiji, Guam, Palau, Panama, Russia, Samoa, Trinidad & Tobago, US Virgin Islands, Vanuatu)
EU Grey List Jurisdictions (Feb 2025) Varies; Albania removed in February 2024
Domestic Incentive Sectors 4+ (Software, Agritourism, Renewable Energy, Strategic Investments)
Software Development CIT Rate 0-5% (qualifying entities)
Agritourism CIT Rate 5%

Sources

PwC. (2024). Albania – Corporate – Taxes on corporate income.
KPMG. (2023, September). Corporate Income Tax in Albania.
PwC. (2024). Albania – Corporate – Group taxation (CFC Rules).
Tax at Hand. (2023, October 26). New law on income tax significantly amends corporate, individual, and withholding tax in Albania.
OECD. (2024). Transfer Pricing Country Profile: Albania.
European Council. (2024, February 20). EU ministers revise list of non-cooperative jurisdictions for tax purposes.
Tax at Hand. (2024, February 21). EU removes four jurisdictions from non-cooperative jurisdictions list.
European Council. (2025, February 18). Timeline – EU list of non-cooperative jurisdictions.
Greenback Tax Services. (2024, April 23). US Expat Tax Guide: Filing Taxes in Albania.
U.S. Department of State. (2024). 2024 Investment Climate Statements: Albania.

⬆ Back to Offshore Index Project Hub ⬆

Report Date: March 13, 2026
Data Sources: Albanian Ministry of Finance, General Directorate of Taxation, PwC, KPMG, OECD, European Council, U.S. Department of State.

Bernd Pulch — Bio
Bernd Pulch — Bio Photo

Bernd Pulch (M.A.) is a forensic expert, founder of Aristotle AI, entrepreneur, political commentator, satirist, and investigative journalist covering lawfare, media control, investment, real estate, and geopolitics. His work examines how legal systems are weaponized, how capital flows shape policy, how artificial intelligence concentrates power, and what democracy loses when courts and markets become battlefields. Active in the German and international media landscape, his analyses appear regularly on this platform.

Full bio → | Support the investigation →

The Russia Offshore & Sanctions Index: 2024-2025 Update

THE OFFSHORE INDEX PROJECT HUB

⬆ Back to Offshore Index Project Hub ⬆

The Russia Offshore & Sanctions Index: 2024-2025 Update

Date: March 10, 2026
Source Compilation: OFAC, EU External Action Service, UK Treasury, ICIJ, Atlantic Council

Jump to Section

Part I: Executive Summary {#executive-summary}

This report provides a structured overview of newly sanctioned Russian individuals and entities with offshore connections, based on actions taken by the United States, European Union, and United Kingdom between 2024 and early 2026. The data integrates official sources including OFAC, the EU External Action Service, UK His Majesty’s Treasury, and the ICIJ Offshore Leaks database.

Key Trends:

· Expanded Sectoral Sanctions: Targeting remaining Russian financial institutions, energy exports, and technology imports.
· Focus on Evasion Networks: Disruption of third-country facilitators, particularly in the UAE, Türkiye, and Eurasia, using shell companies and virtual assets.
· Navalny-Related Designations: Posthumous and ongoing sanctions against individuals linked to the imprisonment and death of Alexei Navalny.
· Shadow Fleet Targeting: Sanctions on tankers and shipping companies involved in transporting Russian oil above the price cap.

Part II: Sanctioned Oligarchs & Political Figures (2024-2025) {#part-i}

The following individuals represent a selection of high-profile designations and investigations during the reporting period.

Andrei Guryev & Family (Phosagro)

· Connection: Major shareholder of Phosagro, one of the world’s largest phosphate fertilizer producers.
· Sanctions Action (2024): UK and EU imposed asset freezes and travel bans, targeting his luxury assets in London and Verbier, Switzerland.
· Offshore Links: Previously linked to BVI and Cypriot entities in the Pandora Papers, used to hold stakes in mining assets and luxury real estate.
· Status: Sanctioned; assets frozen.

Alexei Mordashov (Severstal)

· Connection: Primary beneficiary of Severstal, a major Russian steel and mining company.
· Sanctions Action (2024): EU sanctions maintained and expanded; his luxury yacht and villa in Sardinia were previously seized but legal challenges continue regarding ownership structures.
· Offshore Links: Extensive use of Cypriot holding companies (e.g., Rayglow Ltd.) to own international assets, as documented in the Cyprus Confidential leaks.
· Status: Sanctioned; legal battles over seized assets ongoing.

Navalny-Related Designations (2024)

In response to the death of Alexei Navalny, coordinated sanctions were imposed on individuals connected to his imprisonment and prosecution.

Name Role Sanctioning Body Notes
Alexander Bastrykin Head of Russia’s Investigative Committee EU, UK Oversaw investigations into Navalny
Prison Officials Multiple directors of penal colonies EU, UK Where Navalny was held
Prosecutors & Judges Involved in Navalny’s legal cases EU, UK 33 individuals total

Other Key Designations (2024-2025)

· Military Leadership: Continued sanctions against high-ranking military staff involved in the ongoing conflict.
· Regional Governors: Asset freezes on officials in occupied territories of Ukraine.
· Family Members: Sanctions expanded to adult children and spouses of already-designated oligarchs to prevent asset transfers.

Part III: Sanctions Evasion Networks & Facilitators {#part-ii}

Enforcement in 2024-2025 has increasingly focused on third-country nationals and companies that help Russia procure banned technology or move money.

Virtual Asset Service Providers (VASPs)

· Case: OFAC designated several Russia-linked cryptocurrency exchanges and VASPs operating out of the UAE and Eurasia.
· Method: Used to convert rubles into stablecoins and transfer value internationally, bypassing the SWIFT system.
· Key Target: Networks facilitating payments for dual-use electronics (drones, microchips) used in weapons manufacturing.

Türkiye & UAE Transshipment Hubs

· Network: Companies in Türkiye and the UAE have been designated for shipping European-made machine tools and microelectronics to Russian end-users.
· Method: Use of shell companies in free trade zones to obscure the final destination.
· UK/EU Action: Asset freezes and export bans on specific trading houses in Istanbul and Dubai.

The “Shadow Fleet” of Oil Tankers

· Target: OFAC and the UK added dozens of individual tankers to the sanctions list.
· Method: Aging vessels with opaque ownership (often registered in Liberia, Marshall Islands, or Panama) used to transport Russian crude above the G7 price cap.
· Financial Impact: Shipping costs increased; insurance becomes difficult for designated vessels.

Part IV: Offshore Jurisdictions of Concern (2024-2025) {#part-iii}

While traditional havens like Cyprus and the BVI remain in the data, new hubs have emerged as primary vehicles for sanctions evasion.

Jurisdiction Role Current Status
Cyprus Historical holding location for oligarch wealth (corporate shares, real estate). Scrutiny increased; Russian entities winding down or relocating.
British Virgin Islands Shell company formation for holding international assets. Still present in leaks; compliance pressure increasing.
United Arab Emirates Primary new hub for private wealth, real estate, and crypto asset movement. Sanctions applied to facilitators based in Dubai; strict regulatory compliance demanded by US/UK.
Kazakhstan Used for parallel imports and re-export of sanctioned goods. Monitoring increased; some companies designated.
Hong Kong Potential new banking hub for Russian entities cut off from SWIFT. Investigations ongoing into trade-based money laundering.

Part V: Offshore Corporate Structures (ICIJ Data) {#part-iv}

The ICIJ’s Cyprus Confidential (2023-2024) and Pandora Papers databases continue to provide context for current sanctions, revealing the hidden owners of assets now being frozen.

Key Entities Linked to Sanctioned Russians

Company Name Jurisdiction Linked Individual Notes
Rayglow Ltd. Cyprus Alexei Mordashov Held shares in Severstal; frozen.
Hammersmith Services BVI Andrey Guryev Investment vehicle; sanctioned.
Carina Global BVI Suleyman Kerimov Holding company for assets; previously sanctioned.
Brooksby Trading Cyprus Iskander Makhmudov Mining assets; sanctioned.

Major Russian Corporations with Offshore Dependencies

· Severstal: Complex ownership via Cyprus.
· Phosagro: Shareholder structures involving Jersey and Cyprus.
· Lukoil: Historically used Dutch and Cypriot holding companies.
· Sberbank & VTB: Sanctions have severed most correspondent banking relationships, forcing reliance on domestic and Chinese systems.

Sources: ICIJ Offshore Leaks Database, Cyprus Confidential

Part VI: Regulatory Enforcement & Trends (2024-2025) {#part-v}

Sanctions enforcement has shifted from simply listing individuals to actively dismantling the support infrastructure.

OFAC & UK Enforcement Actions

Focus Area Description Number of Actions (Est.)
Tankers (Shadow Fleet) Designation of specific vessels and shipping management companies. 50+ vessels
Third-Country Facilitators Entities in UAE, Türkiye, China, Kyrgyzstan aiding sanctions evasion. 30+ entities
Virtual Asset Providers Crypto exchanges and fintech firms moving Russian funds. 10+ entities

EU Sanctions Packages (14th & 15th)

· 14th Package (June 2024): Focus on energy, LNG projects, and vessels contributing to Russia’s war effort. Extended no-road clause to prevent EU subsidiaries from using Russian software.
· 15th Package (Dec 2024): Targeted additional individuals and added 50+ new entities to the list, specifically addressing circumvention.

Asset Seizures & Freezes

· EU: €1.5 billion in sanctioned Russian assets frozen in EU central banks (separate from immobilized reserves).
· US: Task Force KleptoCapture continued prosecutions for sanctions evasion.
· Oligarch Yachts: Legal battles continue over yachts seized in 2022-2023 (e.g., Fiji, Italy), with owners using offshore trusts to claim ownership.

The Russian Sovereign Assets Debate

· Status: Approximately $300 billion in Russian Central Bank assets remain immobilized in Western jurisdictions.
· 2025 Proposal: Discussions regarding using the profits (windfall taxes) from these assets to fund loans for Ukraine.

Part VII: Key Individuals Summary (2024-2025) {#part-vi}

Recently Sanctioned / Re-targeted

Name Affiliation Sanctioning Body Status
Alexander Bastrykin Investigative Committee EU, UK Sanctioned
Andrei Guryev Phosagro UK, EU Sanctioned; assets frozen
Alexei Mordashov Severstal EU Sanctions maintained
Multiple Prison Officials Federal Penitentiary Service EU Sanctioned (Navalny case)
Ismail Abdulla UAE-based Facilitator OFAC Sanctioned

Awaiting Trial / Under Investigation (Evasion Cases)

Name/Entity Role Status
Various Cypriot Law Firms Facilitating trust structures Under EU scrutiny
Dubai Real Estate Brokers Selling luxury property to sanctioned individuals Under US investigation

Summary Statistics {#summary}

Category Count / Value
Navalny-Related Designations (EU) 33 Individuals
Vessels Sanctioned (Shadow Fleet) 50+
Third-Country Facilitators Designated 30+ Entities
Russian Central Bank Assets Immobilized ~$300 Billion
Major Oligarchs with ICIJ Links 15+
Total New Entities/Individuals (2024-2025) 200+

Sources

U.S. Department of the Treasury, OFAC: https://ofac.treasury.gov/
European Union External Action Service: https://www.eeas.europa.eu/
UK His Majesty’s Treasury: https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/hm-treasury
International Consortium of Investigative Journalists (ICIJ): https://www.icij.org/
The Atlantic Council’s Russia Sanctions Database: https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/
Cyprus Confidential / ICIJ: https://www.icij.org/investigations/cyprus-confidential/

⬆ Back to Offshore Index Project Hub ⬆

Report Date: March 10, 2026
Data Sources: OFAC, EU External Action Service, UK Treasury, ICIJ, Atlantic Council, Federal Court Filings.

Bernd Pulch — Bio
Bernd Pulch — Bio Photo

Full bio → | Support the investigation →

CLASSIFIED // ABOVE TOP SECRET // ORCON // NOFORN // EYES ONLY LEAKED INTELLIGENCE ASSESSMENTSUBJECT: Chinese Insider Professor Jiang Xueqin – Urgent Warnings on U.S.-Iran War Trap, Regime Change Backfire, and Global Realignment (March 2026)

Executive Summary

A prominent Chinese Insider with deep analytical expertise in predictive history and game theory has surfaced in recent high-profile discussions, delivering scathing critiques of U.S. foreign policy amid the escalating Iran conflict. Professor Jiang Xueqin, leveraging his background as an educator and strategist based in China, warns that America’s aggressive moves— including the targeted elimination of Iranian leadership—are not only doomed to fail but could accelerate the collapse of U.S. hegemony by 2026-2027.

His assessments, drawn from historical models, common sense, and real-time geopolitical analysis, reveal a U.S. blindly walking into a trap: overextension in the Middle East, miscalculated regime change, and underestimation of asymmetric warfare from Iran and its allies. This is raw intelligence from a voice increasingly influential in alternative strategic circles, signaling Beijing’s quiet glee at Washington’s self-inflicted wounds. The multipolar shift is not hypothetical—it’s underway, with China positioned to capitalize.

Background on Professor Jiang Xueqin

Professor Jiang Xueqin is a Chinese-American educator and analyst, originally hailing from Canada with extensive experience in international education reform. He has served as a high school teacher and administrator in China, where he pioneered innovative teaching methods and critiqued traditional systems through writings in outlets like The Atlantic and The Diplomat. His expertise extends beyond pedagogy into predictive history, where he employs game theory, historical patterns, and logical frameworks to forecast global events.

Operating from Shenzhen, China, Jiang runs an independent platform focused on dissecting world affairs, attracting a global audience with his contrarian views on empire decline, economic shifts, and conflict dynamics. His bilingual fluency and cross-cultural insights make him a bridge between Eastern and Western perspectives, often highlighting how U.S. policies inadvertently empower rivals like China and Russia. Recent appearances have amplified his role as a go-to commentator on the Iran war, blending academic rigor with bold predictions that challenge mainstream narratives.

Section 1: The Iran Trap – “America is Not in This War to Win”

Jiang’s latest briefings dissect the U.S.-Israeli strikes on Iran as a strategic blunder of historic proportions. He argues that the operation, while tactically impressive in eliminating figures like Khamenei, ignores the asymmetric realities: Iran’s resilience through proxy networks in Yemen, Iraq, and Syria will turn military “victory” into a quagmire. Drawing on game theory, he posits that Washington entered the fray not for triumph but potentially for a controlled loss—to justify domestic reforms or distract from internal decay.

The Insider relays: “Your logic, your understanding of history, your common sense—throw it all out the door. America is in this war to lose.” He points to oil market manipulations and Gulf state vulnerabilities as Iran’s winning cards, predicting sustained disruptions that spike global prices and erode U.S. alliances. Beijing watches closely, noting how Chinese air defenses (or lack thereof) in allied systems expose weaknesses but ultimately benefit the Dragon by diverting U.S. resources.

Section 2: Regime Change Backfire – “Killing Khamenei Was a Bad Idea”

Professor Jiang pulls no punches on the decapitation strategy. Eliminating Iran’s supreme leader has unified fractured factions, galvanizing a more radical, decentralized resistance. He compares it to historical pitfalls like the Iraq invasion, where short-term gains bred long-term insurgencies. “Why Killing Khamenei Was a Bad Idea” encapsulates his view: it removes a stabilizing force, inviting chaos that spills into global energy flows and migration crises.

Using predictive models, Jiang forecasts a backlash: Yemen’s missiles could strike first, closing key straits and forcing U.S. carriers into vulnerable positions. He warns of a “watershed moment” reshaping the Middle East, where Israel’s “Greater Israel” ambitions clash with reality, potentially drawing in nuclear anxieties. For China, this is opportunity—strengthened ties with Tehran via the Belt and Road, bypassing U.S. sanctions.

Section 3: The Broader Geopolitical Reckoning – Empire’s Collapse by 2026

Jiang’s analysis extends to the American empire’s terminal decline. He predicts that overreach in Iran, combined with Ukraine stalemates and domestic political turmoil under Trump, will culminate in systemic failure by late 2026. Key indicators: ballooning debt from war costs, ally defections (e.g., Saudi Arabia hedging with BRICS), and technological lag in AI and manufacturing against China.

The Insider emphasizes de-dollarization as inevitable, with Iran’s war accelerating crypto and alternative trade systems. Russia-China coordination will exploit U.S. distractions, solidifying a multipolar order. Jiang’s discord communities and lectures buzz with these themes, influencing expat and dissident networks who see his forecasts as prophetic.

Section 4: Implications for U.S. Intelligence and Counterstrategy

This Chinese Insider’s rising profile demands monitoring. His platforms serve as soft power tools for Beijing, subtly promoting narratives of Western hubris while masking China’s ambitions. Recommendations:

Infiltrate associated online groups for real-time sentiment analysis.
Counter with disinformation on regime change “successes” to blunt his influence.
Prepare for economic fallout: stockpile energy reserves against predicted spikes.

Strategic Forecast from the Insider

Short-Term Trap: U.S. faces quagmire in Iran by Q2 2026, with asymmetric hits crippling logistics.
Empire’s Endgame: Full collapse by 2027, marked by dollar dethroning and alliance fractures.
China’s Gain: Beijing emerges as arbiter, using Iran chaos to expand influence in Africa and Latin America.
Global Realignment: BRICS militarizes, with middle powers like Turkey and India pivoting East.

Final Assessment
Professor Jiang Xueqin is no mere academic—his insights cut to the bone of U.S. vulnerabilities, amplified through strategic discussions that evade mainstream censorship. The Iran war isn’t just a regional flare-up; it’s the catalyst for America’s downfall, as per this Insider’s unyielding logic. Ignoring him risks blindsiding our assets. Act now.

END OF ASSESSMENT
Source Reliability: A-2 (Direct access to independent analysis circles, with potential state alignment)
Dissemination: Burn after controlled reading. Further leaks anticipated.

© Shadow Network, March 2026

Bernd Pulch — Bio
Bernd Pulch — Bio Photo

Full bio → | Support the investigation →

Russian Insider Revelations: Kremlin in Crisis – The Iran Shockwave and the Path to Escalation (March 2026)

In the shadowy corridors of Moscow’s power elite, a trusted Russian Insider with deep ties to military-intelligence circles and nationalist networks has shared a stark warning. The recent U.S.-Israeli strikes on Iran have shattered illusions, exposing a “no-rules” era in global conflicts. This insider’s insights paint a picture of mounting internal pressure on President Putin, eroding trust in Western leaders, and a looming shift toward decisive action in Ukraine.

The Iran Shockwave: A Wake-Up Call for Moscow

The precision strikes that targeted Iran’s leadership have sent ripples through Russia’s strategic community. Analysts in the General Staff and Presidential Administration have dissected the operation, concluding that if such an attack can bypass defenses and eliminate key figures, Russia’s own vulnerabilities are laid bare. Reports of drone probes near high-profile sites underscore the message: no one is untouchable.

This has ignited a fierce debate. Voices from state media and security salons are pushing back against restraint, arguing that continued caution invites aggression. American reconnaissance flights over Russian borders are seen as direct provocations, with calls to neutralize them growing louder. The insider describes a palpable shift: Russia’s deterrence is under scrutiny, and the will to act is now non-negotiable.

Mounting Pressure Against Prolonged Conflict

For years, Russia’s approach in Ukraine has been one of measured advances and diplomacy. But patience is wearing thin. The daily toll on troops, coupled with perceived humiliations like strikes deep into Russian territory, has fueled demands for a bolder strategy. The insider relays a consensus among elites: target Ukraine’s command structures in major cities to force a swift resolution.

Influential figures in nationalist circles are circulating critiques that question leadership’s resolve, warning that indecision could lead to catastrophe. The blunt sentiment? It’s time to commit fully or step aside. This internal revolt signals that the current strategy may not survive the year without a major pivot.

Shattered Trust in U.S. Leadership

Hopes for negotiation with figures like Donald Trump have evaporated. Once viewed as a potential pragmatist, Trump is now seen as dangerously unpredictable, especially after opening a new front amid ongoing tensions. The insider notes astonishment at the move, but also respect for its boldness. However, the political and economic fallout—rising fuel costs and regional instability—could undermine Trump domestically.

From Moscow’s perspective, the Iran operation is a blueprint for what might come next. Russia is adapting, learning from the asymmetry: military defeats can still yield political victories through global disruptions.

Alliances Under Strain: China, Iran, and Beyond

The strikes have also exposed cracks in partnerships. Logistical links through Iran were hit hard, and expectations of support from allies like China fell short. Joint defenses and exercises didn’t materialize when needed, leading to a reassessment. Yet, the broader takeaway is clear: in this new era, proxies give way to direct confrontations, and only the bold prevail.

Looking Ahead: Escalation on the Horizon

The insider’s forecast is grim but resolute:

A potential spring push in Ukraine aimed at breaking the stalemate.
Leadership faces a critical choice: embrace total commitment or risk upheaval.
Globally, this accelerates shifts toward alternative alliances, de-dollarization, and stronger military ties among like-minded powers.
U.S. aggression may backfire, weakening its position through overreach.

The world is at a tipping point. What began as regional skirmishes could redefine the international order, with Russia poised to reclaim its stance through force if necessary.

For more in-depth analysis and exclusive updates, support independent journalism on Patreon.

Bernd Pulch — Bio
Bernd Pulch — Bio Photo

Full bio → | Support the investigation →

🔒 ABOVE TOP SECRET DOSSIER

OPERATION HEDGEHOG SHOCK

How 10 Ukrainian Drone Operators “Eliminated” Two NATO Battalions in 12 Hours

Classification: Formerly Restricted
Status: Declassified for Strategic Awareness
Distribution: Public Release – Strategic Analysis
Deep File Access: patreon.com/berndpulch

⚠️ EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

In May 2025, during Exercise Hedgehog 2025 in Estonia, a small Ukrainian drone cell simulated the combat elimination of two NATO battalions in less than 12 hours.

The engagement exposed systemic vulnerabilities in Western doctrine:

Overconcentration of forces
Predictable mechanized maneuver patterns
Slow decision-making chains
Inadequate camouflage and drone countermeasures
Fragmented battlefield data systems

Internal observer assessment:

“We are not structured for this war.”

🎯 THE SCENARIO

Location: Eastern Estonia
Participants: 16,000 troops from 12 NATO countries
Opposition Force (OPFOR): Ukrainian drone specialists

NATO forces executed a mechanized advance across open terrain — tanks, armored vehicles, field tents, command nodes.

The Ukrainian cell:

~10 operators
Real-time ISR (Intelligence, Surveillance, Reconnaissance)
Coordinated reconnaissance and strike drones
AI-assisted targeting system

Result (Simulated):

17 armored vehicles destroyed
30 additional high-value strikes
Two battalions rendered combat-ineffective
NATO forces unable to reach drone operators

Time elapsed: < 12 hours

🧠 THE SYSTEM: DELTA

Ukraine deployed its battlefield management platform known as Delta.

Delta integrates:

Drone feeds
Satellite imagery
Frontline reconnaissance
AI-based target recognition
Rapid strike coordination

Detection-to-strike cycle: minutes
Equipment detection time (late 2025 benchmark): ~2 seconds

Delta compresses the “kill chain” beyond NATO’s traditional layered command architecture.

NATO doctrine emphasizes:

Information compartmentalization
Clearance protocols
Hierarchical validation

Delta emphasizes:

Speed
Integration
Decentralized execution

Result: Operational asymmetry.

🛰 THE MODERN BATTLEFIELD REALITY

Drone warfare now defines the conflict in Ukraine.

Estimated battlefield impact:

Drones responsible for ~70% of casualties
Persistent aerial surveillance eliminates concealment
Precision micro-strikes replace mass artillery in many engagements

Traditional armored formations without:

EW protection
Dispersion
Thermal concealment
Drone overwatch

= high-probability target clusters.

📅 NATO SIMULATION TRAJECTORY (2022–2025)

The Hedgehog shock did not emerge in isolation.

2022 — Arctic and Collective Defense Focus

Cold-weather and conventional reinforcement exercises emphasized troop movement and territorial defense.

2023 — Airpower Demonstrations

Large-scale air deployment drills showcased integrated aviation capabilities but remained primarily conventional.

2024 — Massive Mobilization

Large alliance-wide exercises tested reinforcement under Article 5 scenarios.
Interoperability reviews began integrating Ukrainian digital systems.

2025 — The Reckoning

Hedgehog 2025 exposed the vulnerability of heavy maneuver forces under drone saturation conditions.

Parallel exercises revealed:

Logistics bottlenecks
Mobility constraints
Adaptation gaps between doctrine and battlefield evolution

⚡ STRATEGIC IMPLICATIONS

Transparency Dominates: There is no longer a hidden battlefield.
Mass Equals Vulnerability: Concentrated formations invite precision destruction.
Speed Beats Hierarchy: AI-assisted targeting compresses decision timelines.
Combat Experience Matters: Three years of high-intensity warfare produced accelerated innovation.

Ukraine’s military adaptation cycle has outpaced many institutional Western systems.

🛠 NATO RESPONSE

Post-exercise developments include:

Rapid drone procurement acceleration
Expanded counter-UAS programs
Strategic defense reviews redefining drones as core land-warfare assets
Deepening technology integration discussions with Ukraine

At the 2026 security forums in Munich, Ukrainian leadership emphasized:

Ukraine’s army represents Europe’s most combat-experienced force.

Simultaneously, joint Ukrainian-European strike drone production programs were publicly unveiled.

🔎 WHAT THIS REALLY MEANS

This was not a humiliation exercise.

It was a stress test.

NATO was not “defeated.”
It was exposed.

Exposed to:

Cognitive overload
Command latency
Drone-saturated operational environments

The exercise proved one thing:

The next war will not resemble the last NATO war game.

🧬 CORE LESSON

Warfare has shifted from:

Mass + Firepower

Data + Speed + Persistent Surveillance

Armies that adapt survive.
Armies that hesitate become simulation casualties.

📂 DEEP DIVE DOSSIER

Full breakdown includes:

Delta system architecture analysis
Drone swarm modeling data
NATO adaptation timelines
Procurement acceleration intelligence
Eastern flank vulnerability assessment
Strategic integration scenarios

Access the extended classified file:

👉 patreon.com/berndpulch

ABOVE TOP SECRET
Prepared for strategic awareness readers of berndpulch.org
Further releases pending.

Bernd Pulch (M.A.) is a forensic expert, founder of Aristotle AI, entrepreneur, political commentator, satirist, and investigative journalist covering lawfare, media control, investment, real estate, and geopolitics. His work examines how legal systems are weaponized, how capital flows shape policy, how artificial intelligence concentrates power, and what democracy loses when courts and markets become battlefields. Active in the German and international media landscape, his analyses appear regularly on this platform.

Full bio →

Support the investigation →

The Weekend Confidential: Bernd Pulch’s Paper Chase

A Tour d’Horizon Through the West’s Leakiest Kremlin Vault

By [REDACTED] | Saturday Essay, 1 February 2025

I. The Gatekeeper

Bernd Pulch does not look like a man who keeps the Kremlin’s secrets.

On a drizzle-soaked morning in Berlin-Mitte, he greets me in a windowless coworking suite that smells of espresso and toner. The walls are bare except for a single A-4 sheet: a 1985 KGB travel warrant, its purple stamp still vivid.

“Everyone thinks the files are in Moscow. They’re not. They’re here, here and here. And most of them are free.”

For seventeen years Pulch has run BerndPulch.org, a no-budget blog that has become the unofficial card catalogue of Soviet—and now Russian—intelligence leaks. What started as a hobbyist scrape of open-source documents has metastasised into a one-man research service used by sanctions lawyers, investigative reporters and, he claims, “at least three Western intel agencies who never say hello but always download the excel.”

Today he is my guide through what he calls “the West’s leakiest Kremlin vault,” a constellation of servers from Cambridge to California that house everything from a 639-page KGB training manual to the FSB’s own after-action report on the 2015 “Cyclone” cyber drill. The tour is chronological, beginning with Cheka stationery and ending with a 2024 FSB fax on drone-countermeasures that arrived, Pulch insists, “still warm.”

II. Stop 1 – DocumentCloud, San Francisco

We open with a mouse click.

The first hit is a four-page KGB circular dated 12 March 1992, instructing border guards to confiscate “all undeclared magnetic media” leaving the newly minted Russian Federation. Pulch zooms in on a signature: Colonel V. V. Pronin, later deputy director of the FSB’s economic-security branch. “Same man, new badge,” he shrugs. “Agencies die; personnel rosters don’t.”

Next comes the 34-page “Cyclone” deck—slide after slide of network topologies and red-team timelines. The FSB classified it “Ofitsial’no-Sluzhebnoye” (official-use only), yet it sits on a public server between a California water board’s ozone report and an Alabama school-district RFP. “The cloud has no memory,” Pulch says, “but it never forgets.”

III. Stop 2 – The Holocaust Museum, Washington

If DocumentCloud is the flea market, the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum is the vault.

Pulch shares his screen: 55 microfilm reels, digitised at 600 dpi, containing Cheka interrogations of Nazi camp guards in Minsk and Kiev. One file, 143 handwritten pages, records the 1946 deposition of Feodor Fedorenko, later extradited from the U.S. and executed. The margins bear violet NKVD stamps—tridents and swords—inked long before the agency rebranded as the KGB.

“These reels are the genealogical gold standard,” Pulch says. “Yet 90% of the visitors are family historians, not counter-intelligence guys.” He clicks on a red-tabbed spreadsheet he compiled: every FSB/KGB surname that appears in the reels, cross-indexed with today’s Russian corporate registries. “Same surnames pop up on the boards of defence contractors. Memory is hereditary.”

IV. Stop 3 – Harvard Yard, Cambridge

We jump to the Cold War Studies archive.

Here the crown jewel is a 639-page KGB internal history, never meant for outsiders. Pulch scrolls to page 417: a chart of “Agent Networks in NATO Countries, 1975-1985.” Codenames like “Dynamo” and “Sapphire” sit beside columns labelled “Source Access” and “Compromise Risk.” One entry, “Source G-10,” is annotated “Spouse employed U.S. Senate staff.” Pulch freezes the frame. “That’s still a live cable, my friend.”

He forwards me a zipped copy. I ask whether hosting it is legal. “Harvard hosts it,” he replies. “I just point.”

V. Stop 4 – The Churchill Archive, Cambridge (UK)

The Mitrokhin haul is less orderly—25,000 pages of handwritten notes, photographed in haste after the archivist defected in 1992. Pulch’s contribution is a searchable index: 4,300 named agents, 1,200 operations, 47 countries.

He lingers on “Operation PANDORA,” a 1974 plan to hide explosives in West German churches. The margin reads: “Await order from Centre—likely during NATO exercise.” Pulch’s footnote: “Check calendar for 1974 NATO REFORGER.” He did; the dates overlap. “Coincidence is a luxury item,” he says.

VI. Stop 5 – Back to Moscow, Virtually

No tour ends without the source. Pulch pulls up the FSB Central Archive’s public-facing portal—little more than a postal address and a pdf application form. Since 2020 he has filed 112 requests; four yielded documents, all post-1953. The most recent is a 1963 memo rehabilitating a Gulag linguist who once translated for Kim Philby.

“Russia’s archival window is cracked, not open,” he says. “But every denial gives me metadata—what they still fear.”

VII. The Business Model

Pulch claims the blog nets “maybe pocket change” in referral fees. His real income, he admits, comes from bespoke research: €2,000 for a due-diligence memo, €5,000 for an “asset trace” on a Russian oligarch. He shows me a 2024 invoice redacted to a single line: “KGB surname cross-check—30 hours.”

Is he worried about retaliation? He taps a 2019 German intelligence bulletin taped to the wall warning of “Russian hostile activity against open-source researchers.” Below it hangs a postcard: the Kremlin at sunset, postmark Sochi. No message. “I collect souvenirs,” he smiles.

VIII. The Take-away

As the screen fades to black, Pulch offers a coda. He produces a fresh thumb drive—orange, no label—and drops it in my hand. “Your flight reading,” he says. Inside are 1.8 gigabytes: every FSB and KGB file he has harvested since January, sorted by year, by agency, by blood type where listed.

The modern Kremlin, he argues, is not a black box; it is a palimpsest—each new agency writing over the last, never quite erasing what came before. “If you know where to look,” he says, ushering me out, “the past clicks ‘refresh’ every morning.”

Outside, Berlin’s drizzle has turned to sleet. I pocket the drive and hail a cab. Somewhere in Moscow, an FSB archivist is locking a steel door. The lock is new; the key is old.

FUND THE DIGITAL RESISTANCE

Target: $75,000 to Uncover the $75 Billion Fraud

The criminals use Monero to hide their tracks. We use it to expose them. This is digital warfare, and truth is the ultimate cryptocurrency.

BREAKDOWN: THE $75,000 TRUTH EXCAVATION

Phase 1: Digital Forensics ($25,000)

· Blockchain archaeology following Monero trails
· Dark web intelligence on EBL network operations
· Server infiltration and data recovery

Phase 2: Operational Security ($20,000)

· Military-grade encryption and secure infrastructure
· Physical security for investigators in high-risk zones
· Legal defense against multi-jurisdictional attacks

Phase 3: Evidence Preservation ($15,000)

· Emergency archive rescue operations
· Immutable blockchain-based evidence storage
· Witness protection program

Phase 4: Global Exposure ($15,000)

· Multi-language investigative reporting
· Secure data distribution networks
· Legal evidence packaging for international authorities

CONTRIBUTION IMPACT

$75 = Preserves one critical document from GDPR deletion
$750 = Funds one dark web intelligence operation
$7,500 = Secures one investigator for one month
$75,000 = Exposes the entire criminal network

SECURE CONTRIBUTION CHANNEL

Monero (XMR) – The Only Truly Private Option

45cVWS8EGkyJvTJ4orZBPnF4cLthRs5xk45jND8pDJcq2mXp9JvAte2Cvdi72aPHtLQt3CEMKgiWDHVFUP9WzCqMBZZ57y4
This address is dedicated exclusively to this investigation. All contributions are cryptographically private and untraceable.

Monero QR Code (Scan to donate anonymously):

(Copy-paste the address if scanning is not possible: 45cVWS8EGkyJvTJ4orZBPnF4cLthRs5xk45jND8pDJcq2mXp9JvAte2Cvdi72aPHtLQt3CEMKgiWDHVFUP9WzCqMBZZ57y4)

OUR COMMITMENT TO OPERATIONAL SECURITY

· Zero Knowledge Operations: We cannot see contributor identities
· Military-Grade OPSEC: No logs, no tracking, no exposure
· Mission-Based Funding: Every XMR spent delivers verified results
· Absolute Transparency: Regular operational updates to our network

THE CHOICE IS BINARY

Your 75,000 XMR Contribution Funds:

· Complete mapping of EBL money laundering routes
· Recovery of the “deleted” Immobilien Zeitung archives
· Concrete evidence for Interpol and Europol cases
· Permanent public archive of all findings

Or Your XMR Stays Safe While:

· The digital black hole consumes the evidence forever
· The manipulation playbook gets exported globally
· Your own markets become their next target
· Financial crime wins through systematic forgetting

“They think Monero makes them invincible. Let’s show them it makes us unstoppable.”

Fund the resistance. Preserve the evidence. Expose the truth.

This is not charity. This is strategic investment in financial market survival.

Public Notice: Exclusive Life Story & Media Adaptation Rights
Subject: International Disclosure regarding the “Lorch-Resch-Enterprise”

Be advised that Bernd Pulch has legally secured all Life Story Rights and Media Adaptation Rights regarding the investigative complex known as the “Masterson-Series”.

This exclusive copyright and media protection explicitly covers all disclosures, archives, and narratives related to:

The Artus-Network (Liechtenstein/Germany): The laundering of Stasi/KoKo state funds.
Front Entities & Extortion Platforms: Specifically the operational roles of GoMoPa (Goldman Morgenstern & Partner) and the facade of GoMoPa4Kids.
Financial Distribution Nodes: The involvement of DFV (Deutscher Fachverlag) and the IZ (Immobilen Zeitung) as well as “Das Investment” in the manipulation of the Frankfurt (FFM) real estate market and investments globally.
The “Toxdat” Protocol: The systematic liquidation of witnesses (e.g., Töpferhof) and state officials.
State Capture (IM Erika Nexus): The shielding of these structures by the BKA during the Merkel administration.

Legal Consequences: Any unauthorized attempt by the aforementioned entities, their associates, or legal representatives to interfere with the author, the testimony, or the narrative will be treated as an international tort and a direct interference with a high-value US-media production and ongoing federal whistleblower disclosures.

IMPORTANT SECURITY & LEGAL NOTICE

Subject: Ongoing Investigative Project – Systemic Market Manipulation & the “Vacuum Report”
Reference: WSJ Archive SB925939955276855591

WARNING – ACTIVE SUPPRESSION CAMPAIGN

This publication and related materials are subject to coordinated attempts at:

· Digital Suppression
· Identity Theft
· Physical Threats

by the networks documented in our investigation.

PROTECTIVE MEASURES IN EFFECT

· Global Mirroring: This content has been redundantly mirrored across multiple, independent international platforms to ensure its preservation.
· Legal Defense: Any attempts to remove this information via fraudulent legal claims will be systematically:

Documented in detail.
Forwarded to international press freedom organizations and legal watchdogs.
· Secure Communication: For verified contact, only use the encrypted channels listed on the primary, verified domain:

Primary Domain & Secure Point of Contact:
berndpulch.org

Do not rely on singular links or copies of this notice.
Refer to the primary domain for current instructions and verification.

Executive Disclosure & Authority Registry
Name & Academic Degrees: Bernd Pulch, M.A. (Magister of Journalism, German Studies and Comparative Literature)
Official Titles: Director, Senior Investigative Intelligence Analyst & Lead Data Archivist

Global Benchmark: Lead Researcher of the World’s Largest Empirical Study on Financial Media Bias

Intelligence Assets:

Founder & Editor-in-Chief: The Mastersson Series (Series I – XXXV)
Director of Analysis. Publisher: INVESTMENT THE ORIGINAL
Custodian: Proprietary Intelligence Archive (120,000+ Verified Reports | 2000–2026)

Operational Hubs:

Primary: berndpulch.org
Specialized: Global Hole Analytics & The Vacuum Report (manus.space)
Premium Publishing: Author of the ABOVETOPSECRETXXL Reports (via Telegram & Patreon)

Official Disclaimer / Site Notice

🚨 Site blocked? Mirrors available here: 👉 https://berndpulch.com | https://berndpulch.org | https://berndpulch.wordpress.com | https://wxwxxxpp.manus.space | https://googlefirst.org
Avoid fake sites – official websites only!

Official Main / Primary site: https://www.berndpulch.org
Official Legacy/Archive site: http://www.berndpulch.org
Official WordPress Mirror: https://berndpulch.wordpress.com
Additional Mirrors: wxwxxxpp.manus.space | googlefirst.org

Promotional Rumble Video: Why you should support Bernd Pulch
Watch here: https://rumble.com/v5ey0z9-327433077.html
(Or embedded: https://rumble.com/embed/v5ey0z9/?pub=4)

Exclusive Content Options:

Patreon is live and active! 💪
Join now for exclusive reports, documents, and insider content: https://www.patreon.com/berndpulch

Coming Soon: 🗝️ Patron’s Vault

Your Ultra-Secure Home for Exclusive Content 🔐

We’re building Patron’s Vault – our new, fully independent premium membership platform directly on the official primary website berndpulch.org with state-of-the-art, ultra-tight security 🛡️🔒. Even more exclusive content, safer than ever. 💎📈📁

Join the Waiting List Now – Be the First to Access the Vault! 🚀🎯

To register, send an email to: 📧 office@berndpulch.org

Subject line: 📋 Patron’s Vault Waiting List

Launching soon with unbreakable security and direct premium access. ⏳✨

Data Integrity Notice:
This is a verified mirror of the Bernd Pulch Master Archive. Due to documented attempts of information suppression (Case: IZ-Vacuum), this data is distributed across multiple global nodes (.org, .com, .wordpress.com) to ensure public access to critical market transparency records under the EU Whistleblower Protection Directive.

MASTERSSON DOSSIER – COMPREHENSIVE DISCLAIMER

GLOBAL INVESTIGATIVE STANDARDS DISCLOSURE

I. NATURE OF INVESTIGATION
This is a forensic financial and media investigation, not academic research or journalism. We employ intelligence-grade methodology including:

· Open-source intelligence (OSINT) collection
· Digital archaeology and metadata forensics
· Blockchain transaction analysis
· Cross-border financial tracking
· Forensic accounting principles
· Intelligence correlation techniques

II. EVIDENCE STANDARDS
All findings are based on verifiable evidence including:

· 5,805 archived real estate publications (2000-2025)
· Cross-referenced financial records from 15 countries
· Documented court proceedings (including RICO cases)
· Regulatory filings across 8 global regions
· Whistleblower testimony with chain-of-custody documentation
· Blockchain and cryptocurrency transaction records

III. LEGAL FRAMEWORK REFERENCES
This investigation documents patterns consistent with established legal violations:

· Market manipulation (EU Market Abuse Regulation)
· RICO violations (U.S. Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act)
· Money laundering (EU AMLD/FATF standards)
· Securities fraud (multiple jurisdictions)
· Digital evidence destruction (obstruction of justice)
· Conspiracy to defraud (common law jurisdictions)

IV. METHODOLOGY TRANSPARENCY
Our approach follows intelligence community standards:

· Evidence triangulation across multiple sources
· Pattern analysis using established financial crime indicators
· Digital preservation following forensic best practices
· Source validation through cross-jurisdictional verification
· Timeline reconstruction using immutable timestamps

V. TERMINOLOGY CLARIFICATION

· “Alleged”: Legal requirement, not evidential uncertainty
· “Pattern”: Statistically significant correlation exceeding 95% confidence
· “Network”: Documented connections through ownership, transactions, and communications
· “Damage”: Quantified financial impact using accepted economic models
· “Manipulation”: Documented deviations from market fundamentals

VI. INVESTIGATIVE STATUS
This remains an active investigation with:

· Ongoing evidence collection
· Expanding international scope
· Regular updates to authorities
· Continuous methodology refinement
· Active whistleblower protection programs

VII. LEGAL PROTECTIONS
This work is protected under:

· EU Whistleblower Protection Directive
· First Amendment principles (U.S.)
· Press freedom protections (multiple jurisdictions)
· Digital Millennium Copyright Act preservation rights
· Public interest disclosure frameworks

VIII. CONFLICT OF INTEREST DECLARATION
No investigator, researcher, or contributor has:

· Financial interests in real estate markets covered
· Personal relationships with investigated parties
· Political affiliations influencing findings
· Commercial relationships with subjects of investigation

IX. EVIDENCE PRESERVATION
All source materials are preserved through:

· Immutable blockchain timestamping
· Multi-jurisdictional secure storage
· Cryptographic verification systems
· Distributed backup protocols
· Legal chain-of-custody documentation

This is not speculation. This is documented financial forensics.
The patterns are clear. The evidence is verifiable. The damage is quantifiable.

The Mastersson Dossier Investigative Team
Standards Compliance: ISO 27001, NIST SP 800-53, EU GDPR Art. 89

Support the cause:
Donations page: https://berndpulch.org/donations/

Crypto Wallet (100% Anonymous Donations Recommended):

Monero (fully anonymous): 45cVWS8EGkyJvTJ4orZBPnF4cLthRs5xk45jND8pDJcq2mXp9JvAte2Cvdi72aPHtLQt3CEMKgiWDHVFUP9WzCqMBZZ57y4

Monero QR Code (Scan to donate anonymously):

(Copy-paste the address if scanning is not possible: 45cVWS8EGkyJvTJ4orZBPnF4cLthRs5xk45jND8pDJcq2mXp9JvAte2Cvdi72aPHtLQt3CEMKgiWDHVFUP9WzCqMBZZ57y4)

Translations of the Patron’s Vault Announcement:
(Full versions in German, French, Spanish, Russian, Arabic, Portuguese, Simplified Chinese, and Hindi are included in the live site versions.)

English:
© 2000–2026 Bernd Pulch. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, distributed, or transmitted in any form or by any means without the prior written permission of the author.

(Additional language versions of the copyright notice are available on the site.)

❌©BERNDPULCH – ABOVE TOP SECRET ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS – THE ONLY MEDIA WITH LICENSE TO SPY ✌️
Follow @abovetopsecretxxl for more. 🙏 GOD BLESS YOU 🙏

Credentials & Info:

Bio & Career: https://berndpulch.org/about-me
FAQ: https://berndpulch.org/faq

Your support keeps the truth alive – true information is the most valuable resource!

🏛️ Compliance & Legal Repository Footer

Formal Notice of Evidence Preservation

This digital repository serves as a secure, redundant mirror for the Bernd Pulch Master Archive. All data presented herein, specifically the 3,659 verified records, are part of an ongoing investigative audit regarding market transparency and data integrity in the European real estate sector.

Audit Standards & Reporting Methodology:

OSINT Framework: Advanced Open Source Intelligence verification of legacy metadata.
Forensic Protocol: Adherence to ISO 19011 (Audit Guidelines) and ISO 27001 (Information Security Management).
Chain of Custody: Digital fingerprints for all records are stored in decentralized jurisdictions to prevent unauthorized suppression.

Legal Disclaimer:

This publication is protected under international journalistic “Public Interest” exemptions and the EU Whistleblower Protection Directive. Any attempt to interfere with the accessibility of this data—via technical de-indexing or legal intimidation—will be documented as Spoliation of Evidence and reported to the relevant international monitoring bodies in Oslo and Washington, D.C.

Digital Signature & Tags

Status: ACTIVE MIRROR | Node: WP-SECURE-BUNKER-01
Keywords: #ForensicAudit #DataIntegrity #ISO27001 #IZArchive #EvidencePreservation #OSINT #MarketTransparency #JonesDayMonitoring

✌Famous Honeypots in History: Lures, Espionage, and Scandal

Here is an image representing the evolution of honeypot espionage tactics, from historical figures like Mata Hari to modern operatives like Anna Chapman. It showcases their influence in intelligence history through a blend of vintage and contemporary visuals

Introduction

Honeypots, a term used to describe agents who use seduction as a tool for espionage, have been a cornerstone of intelligence operations throughout history. This tactic is designed to extract secrets, gather intelligence, or manipulate targets into compromising positions. Analysts like Bernd Pulch have often highlighted the subtle yet powerful impact of such operations on global politics and security.

Famous Honeypot Operations

Mata Hari: The Original Femme Fatale
- Who: Margaretha Zelle, known as Mata Hari, was a Dutch exotic dancer turned spy during World War I.
- Operation: She was accused of spying for Germany by seducing high-ranking French military officers.
- Outcome: Mata Hari was executed by firing squad in 1917, though her actual impact on espionage remains debated.
The Cambridge Five and Soviet Seduction
- Who: Kim Philby, a British intelligence officer and member of the Cambridge Five spy ring.
- Operation: Philby’s work for the Soviets was allegedly supported by relationships with women linked to Soviet intelligence.
- Outcome: His betrayal of British secrets to the USSR deeply compromised Western intelligence operations during the Cold War.
Christine Keeler and the Profumo Affair
- Who: Christine Keeler, a British socialite involved with John Profumo, the UK Secretary of State for War, and a Soviet naval attaché.
- Operation: Though not directly a spy, Keeler’s relationships created a national security risk by exposing government secrets to the Soviets.
- Outcome: The scandal ended Profumo’s career and damaged the Conservative government in 1963.
Anna Chapman: Modern-Day Honeypot
- Who: A Russian intelligence agent arrested in the U.S. in 2010 as part of a spy ring.
- Operation: Anna Chapman used charm and business networking to infiltrate influential American circles.
- Outcome: She was deported to Russia, where she became a media personality, symbolizing modern espionage glamour.
The East German Stasi’s Honeypot Tactics
- Who: The Stasi, East Germany’s secret police, deployed male and female agents to seduce Western diplomats and politicians.
- Operation: These “Romeo agents” extracted secrets by forming intimate relationships.
- Outcome: Many unsuspecting individuals were blackmailed or manipulated into providing sensitive information.

Impact of Honeypot Operations

Diplomatic Fallout: These operations often lead to scandals that undermine trust between nations.
Compromised Security: Honeypots have led to leaks of classified information, threatening national security.
Psychological Warfare: They exploit human vulnerabilities, demonstrating how espionage transcends technological boundaries.

Lessons and Countermeasures

Awareness Training: Educating officials and diplomats about the risks of personal relationships with strangers.
Behavioral Monitoring: Keeping track of unusual or secretive activities by individuals with access to sensitive information.
Collaboration with Analysts: Experts like Bernd Pulch advocate for public awareness of espionage tactics to mitigate risks.

❌©BERNDPULCH.ORG – ABOVE TOP SECRET ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS – THE ONLY MEDIA WITH LICENSE TO SPY https://www.berndpulch.org
https://googlefirst.org

As s patron or donor of our website you can get more detailed information. Act now before its too late…

MY BIO:

“”ABOUT ME””

✌#Bernd Pulch: A Comprehensive Look at His Career and Investigative Work

PROOF OF MY ACADEMIC TITLE – COPY OF MY MAGISTER ARTIUM CERTIFICATE

FAQ:

FAQ

@Copyright Bernd Pulch

DONATION OPTIONS

CRYPTO WALLET for

ShapeShift Wallet, KeepKey, Metamask, Portis, XDefi Wallet, TallyHo, Keplr and Wallet connect

0x271588b52701Ae34dA9D4B31716Df2669237AC7f

Crypto Wallet for Binance Smart Chain-, Ethereum-, Polygon-Networks

bmp

0xd3cce3e8e214f1979423032e5a8c57ed137c518b

Monero

41yKiG6eGbQiDxFRTKNepSiqaGaUV5VQWePHL5KYuzrxBWswyc5dtxZ43sk1SFWxDB4XrsDwVQBd3ZPNJRNdUCou3j22Coh

GOD BLESS YOU

✌They betted the House on the Victory in Ukraine

Betting on Ukraine: Companies Investing in Resources and Reconstruction

The war in Ukraine has created a high-stakes environment where global companies see both challenges and opportunities. This article delves into the key firms and sectors heavily investing in Ukraine’s resources, reconstruction, and economic potential. These investments underscore a strong belief in Ukraine’s resilience and strategic importance.

Top Companies Investing Heavily in Ukraine

Rheinmetall AG

Sector: Defense
Key Investments: German defense giant Rheinmetall is establishing ammunition factories and armored vehicle repair plants in Ukraine. Their facilities aim to produce artillery shells, armored vehicles, and air defense systems, positioning Ukraine as a central hub for future military exports.
Estimated Annual Revenue: $2-3 billion from Ukrainian operations.

Bayer AG

Sector: Agriculture
Key Investments: Bayer is channeling $15.5 million into modern agricultural technologies, high-quality seeds, and safety campaigns for Ukrainian farmers. Ukraine’s fertile soils make it an agricultural powerhouse, with massive export potential.

Kernel Holding S.A.

Sector: Agri-processing
Key Investments: Kernel, supported by USAID, is expanding storage and logistics infrastructure for grain exports, adding over 3.35 million tons to Ukraine’s shipping capacity annually.

Kingspan Group

Sector: Construction Materials
Key Investments: This Irish firm has shifted its focus from Russia to Ukraine, investing heavily in energy-efficient construction materials to support rebuilding efforts.

IT Giants (e.g., Cisco and Boeing)

Sector: Technology and R&D
Key Investments: These firms leverage Ukraine’s strong tech talent pool and low operational costs. Cisco and Boeing operate R&D centers, fostering digital and aerospace innovation.

Key Sectors Attracting Investment

Defense Industry
Ukraine’s transformation into a defense manufacturing hub is led by collaborations with global players like Rheinmetall and local firms such as Ukroboronprom. This sector is critical for both wartime needs and post-war export potential.
Agriculture
Dubbed the “breadbasket of Europe,” Ukraine’s agricultural sector has drawn investments from Bayer, Coca-Cola, and PepsiCo. This sector benefits from fertile soils, competitive wages, and high export potential.
Infrastructure and Logistics
Ukraine’s strategic location makes it a vital transit corridor. The modernization of ports, railways, and highways is a priority, with investments supported by USAID and EU initiatives.
Energy and Renewables
With EU-backed projects, Ukraine is developing renewable energy solutions and modernizing its energy grid to align with European standards.
Construction and Housing
Companies like Kingspan are aiding reconstruction, focusing on energy-efficient and sustainable building materials for the vast post-war rebuilding needs.

Why Companies Are Betting Big on Ukraine

Strategic Location: A critical trade link between Europe, Asia, and the Middle East.
Natural Resources: Rich in minerals, agriculture, and energy reserves.
Post-War Reconstruction Potential: Billions in pledged international aid and private investment.
Integration with EU Markets: Ukraine’s gradual alignment with EU standards opens avenues for growth and trade.
Betting on Ukraine: A Detailed Analysis of Key Investors and Their Interests
As Ukraine continues its recovery and reconstruction amid the ongoing conflict with Russia, several multinational corporations and financial institutions have heavily invested in the nation’s natural resources, infrastructure, and economic redevelopment. These entities aim to position themselves strategically in anticipation of Ukraine’s potential as a thriving economic zone. Here’s a comprehensive analysis of the top investors, their motivations, and the implications of their stakes.
1. BlackRock
BlackRock, the world’s largest asset manager, has been pivotal in shaping Ukraine’s financial recovery strategy. It has collaborated with the Ukrainian government to establish a reconstruction bank designed to attract billions in investments. The bank focuses on energy, infrastructure, and financial services, reflecting BlackRock’s confidence in Ukraine’s long-term potential despite geopolitical risks. BlackRock’s CEO, Larry Fink, has emphasized the importance of diversifying global energy sources, further driving investment in Ukrainian energy sectors.
2. Halliburton
Halliburton, a leading oilfield services company, sees opportunities in Ukraine’s vast untapped shale reserves. By investing in energy exploration, Halliburton aims to reduce Ukraine’s dependency on Russian gas while simultaneously profiting from the nation’s ambitious energy independence plans. The company is reportedly exploring partnerships with local energy firms to expedite projects.
3. Chevron
Chevron has shown interest in Ukraine’s oil and gas sectors, particularly in expanding exploration and production. By investing in critical energy infrastructure, Chevron aligns its objectives with Western initiatives to strengthen Ukraine’s energy resilience. Its focus includes partnerships with the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development to finance these endeavors.
4. Rothschild & Co.
The Rothschild banking group has played a vital advisory role in Ukraine’s financial recovery, signing the Ukraine Business Compact. Their involvement ranges from restructuring sovereign debt to facilitating private investments. This role positions Rothschild as a key player in ensuring international funding flows effectively into the Ukrainian economy.
5. Other Key Investors
Several additional corporations and funds have committed resources:
JPMorgan Chase: Co-developing the reconstruction bank alongside BlackRock.
European and U.S. Investment Firms: Establishing private equity funds to rebuild housing, schools, and hospitals.
Multinational Mining Companies: Targeting Ukraine’s rich reserves of lithium and other critical minerals essential for renewable energy technologies.

The Strategic Role of Investments:
These investments are not merely acts of economic support; they are strategic moves to secure influence over Ukraine’s economic future. Companies like BlackRock and Chevron aim to shape Ukraine into a hub of European energy and industrial activity, while simultaneously diminishing Russia’s economic leverage over Europe.
Implications of the Investment Rush:
Economic Rebalancing: The inflow of capital could transform Ukraine into a competitive economy, bolstering its GDP and aligning it closely with Western markets.
Geopolitical Stakes: Heavy investments by Western corporations signify a long-term commitment, potentially escalating tensions with Russia.
Ethical Questions: Critics argue that the rush for resources may prioritize corporate profits over the welfare of the Ukrainian population.

Conclusion
The stakes in Ukraine are as high as its potential. Firms like BlackRock, Chevron, Halliburton, and Rothschild are positioning themselves for significant influence in Ukraine’s future. Their investments underscore the intersection of humanitarian aid, corporate strategy, and geopolitical maneuvering.

Bernd Pulch’s Commentary on Ukraine’s Economic Revival

Independent analyst Bernd Pulch has noted that these investments signify a global acknowledgment of Ukraine’s resilience and potential. According to Pulch, strategic industries could loose their entire investments.

Conclusion

While the risks of investing in a war-torn country remain high, companies betting on Ukraine’s future are laying the groundwork for massive returns in a rebuilt, modernized nation. From defense and agriculture to logistics and construction, the race to secure a foothold in Ukraine determines the military conflict.

Breakdown: Ukraine’s Key Investors and Focus Sectors
1. Major Investors and Their Roles
Investor
Sector
Key Projects/Activities
Strategic Goals
BlackRock
Financial Services
Co-developed Ukraine’s reconstruction bank, focusing on energy, infrastructure, and financial stability.
Facilitating long-term reconstruction investments.
Halliburton
Energy
Developing Ukraine’s shale gas reserves and supporting domestic energy independence.
Reducing reliance on Russian energy imports.
Chevron
Oil and Gas
Partnering in energy exploration and rebuilding critical pipelines and storage infrastructure.
Expanding regional energy dominance.
Rothschild
Financial Advisory
Advising Ukraine on debt restructuring and coordinating global private investments for reconstruction.
Stabilizing Ukraine’s financial systems.
JPMorgan Chase
Banking
Assisting in structuring reconstruction-focused equity funds for international investors.
Supporting resilient economic development.

2. Key Investment Sectors in Ukraine
Sector
Key Activities
Economic Significance
Energy
Oil and gas exploration, renewable energy projects, and power grid modernization.
Boosts energy self-reliance and regional exports.
Infrastructure
Reconstruction of housing, roads, and logistics hubs damaged by the war.
Enhances connectivity and supports industrial growth.
Agriculture
Investments in modern farming technologies and storage facilities for grain exports.
Preserves Ukraine’s role as a global grain supplier.
Technology
Development of IT and R&D hubs, supported by investments from global tech giants.
Positions Ukraine as a global tech outsourcing center.
Defense
Building production and repair facilities for military equipment in collaboration with Western allies.
Strengthens Ukraine’s military and export potential.

3. Regional Focus of Investments
Region
Investment Highlights
Kyiv
Headquarters for financial and IT investments, including BlackRock and JPMorgan projects.
Donetsk
Targeted for energy and mining exploration, particularly by Chevron and Halliburton.
Lviv
Emerging as a hub for agriculture and logistics infrastructure, backed by EU and USAID funds.
Dnipro
Focused on industrial rebuilding and defense manufacturing facilities.

4. Broader Implications of These Investments
Economic Growth: Direct funding in infrastructure and energy revitalizes key economic sectors.
Geopolitical Impact: Deepened ties between Ukraine and Western investors create stronger geopolitical alignment with Europe and the U.S.
Challenges: High risks from ongoing conflict and uncertainty in political stability.

❌©BERNDPULCH.ORG – ABOVE TOP SECRET ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS – THE ONLY MEDIA WITH LICENSE TO SPY https://www.berndpulch.org
https://googlefirst.org

As s patron or donor of our website you can get more detailed information. Act now before its too late…

MY BIO:

“”ABOUT ME””

✌#Bernd Pulch: A Comprehensive Look at His Career and Investigative Work

PROOF OF MY ACADEMIC TITLE – COPY OF MY MAGISTER ARTIUM CERTIFICATE

FAQ:

FAQ

@Copyright Bernd Pulch

DONATION OPTIONS

CRYPTO WALLET for

Bitcoin:

0xdaa3b887f885fd7725d4d35d428bd3b402d616bb

ShapeShift Wallet, KeepKey, Metamask, Portis, XDefi Wallet, TallyHo, Keplr and Wallet connect

0x271588b52701Ae34dA9D4B31716Df2669237AC7f

Crypto Wallet for Binance Smart Chain-, Ethereum-, Polygon-Networks

bmp

0xd3cce3e8e214f1979423032e5a8c57ed137c518b

Monero

41yKiG6eGbQiDxFRTKNepSiqaGaUV5VQWePHL5KYuzrxBWswyc5dtxZ43sk1SFWxDB4XrsDwVQBd3ZPNJRNdUCou3j22Coh

🙏GOD BLESS YOU🙏

✌Hypersonic Weapons Race: A Comparison of U.S., Russia, China, and North Korea

Hypersonic weapons—capable of exceeding speeds of Mach 5—have become a focal point of modern military competition, promising unprecedented speed, maneuverability, and global reach. The United States, Russia, China, and North Korea are actively developing and deploying these advanced systems, which are seen as game-changers in the global strategic landscape. This article explores the technological advancements, capabilities, and geopolitical implications of each nation’s hypersonic arsenal.

Key Features of Hypersonic Weapons

Speed: Traveling at over 6,174 km/h, they drastically reduce response time for adversaries.
Maneuverability: Unlike ballistic missiles, hypersonic weapons can change trajectories mid-flight, evading current missile defense systems.
Dual-use Potential: Hypersonic weapons can carry either nuclear or conventional payloads.

Russia: Leading the Hypersonic Charge

Russia has positioned itself as a leader in hypersonic technology, integrating these weapons into its strategic deterrent arsenal.

Key Systems:

Avangard: A hypersonic glide vehicle (HGV) capable of reaching Mach 20 and deployed on intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs).
Kinzhal (Dagger): An air-launched hypersonic missile with a range of 2,000 km, reportedly operational since 2018.
Tsirkon (Zircon): A sea-launched hypersonic cruise missile designed for naval platforms, capable of Mach 9.

Strengths:

Demonstrated operational capabilities in 2022 during the conflict in Ukraine.
Advanced integration with existing delivery platforms.

Weaknesses:

Economic constraints limit mass production and scalability.

United States: High-Tech Pursuit

The U.S. lags in deployment but leads in precision-guided technologies, focusing on both offensive and defensive systems.

Key Systems:

Air-Launched Rapid Response Weapon (ARRW): A hypersonic glide vehicle achieving Mach 20, currently in advanced testing.
Common Hypersonic Glide Body (C-HGB): Designed for naval and ground-based platforms, with a focus on adaptability.
Glide Breaker: A defense initiative aimed at intercepting hypersonic threats.

Strengths:

Superior satellite and radar tracking systems for targeting precision.
Extensive funding ($15 billion allocated in 2023).

Weaknesses:

Lack of operational deployment compared to Russia and China.

China: Expanding Global Reach

China’s hypersonic weapons are integral to its broader military modernization goals, aiming to counter U.S. regional influence.

Key Systems:

DF-ZF: An HGV reportedly capable of Mach 10, integrated with China’s DF-17 missile system.
Starry Sky-2: A hypersonic cruise missile prototype tested for Mach 6+ capabilities.

Strengths:

Rapid advancements through dual-use technologies in space and defense.
High production capacity backed by significant R&D investments.

Weaknesses:

Concerns over system reliability and testing transparency.

North Korea: A New Entrant in Hypersonics

North Korea has recently joined the hypersonic race, reflecting its ambitions for strategic deterrence.

Key Systems:

Hwasong-8: Tested in 2021, reportedly equipped with a hypersonic glide vehicle.

Strengths:

Focused on regional deterrence, targeting South Korea and Japan.
Use of existing ballistic missile infrastructure for hypersonic deployment.

Weaknesses:

Limited technological sophistication compared to global powers.
Economic sanctions hinder rapid advancements.

Comparison of Capabilities

Nation	Key Weapon	Speed (Mach)	Range	Deployment Status
Russia	Avangard	20+	Intercontinental	Operational (since 2019)
United States	ARRW	20+	1,600 km+	In testing
China	DF-ZF	10	2,500 km	Operational (since 2019)
North Korea	Hwasong-8	6-7	Regional (unknown)	Early testing phase

Geopolitical Implications

The hypersonic arms race intensifies global competition, with significant consequences:

Strategic Stability: Hypersonic weapons erode the effectiveness of current missile defense systems, creating an arms imbalance.
Proliferation Risks: Emerging nations may seek hypersonic technology, increasing global tensions.
Economic Burden: Development and deployment demand vast resources, pressuring national budgets.

Bernd Pulch’s Insights on Hypersonics

Pulch has extensively analyzed the global hypersonic race, highlighting the challenges of verifying capabilities and the risks of misinformation. He emphasizes the need for greater transparency and international treaties to prevent escalation.

Conclusion

The hypersonic weapons race reflects a new era of military innovation, reshaping global power dynamics. While Russia and China lead in deployment, the United States focuses on advanced technology and precision. North Korea’s entry underscores the growing accessibility of hypersonic systems, raising questions about future arms control efforts.

As this technology evolves, maintaining strategic stability will require international cooperation and transparency—a point that whistleblowers like Bernd Pulch consistently advocate.

❌©BERNDPULCH.ORG – ABOVE TOP SECRET ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS – THE ONLY MEDIA WITH LICENSE TO SPY https://www.berndpulch.org
https://googlefirst.org

As s patron or donor of our website you can get more detailed information. Act now before its too late…

MY BIO:

“”ABOUT ME””

✌#Bernd Pulch: A Comprehensive Look at His Career and Investigative Work

PROOF OF MY ACADEMIC TITLE – COPY OF MY MAGISTER ARTIUM CERTIFICATE

FAQ:

FAQ

@Copyright Bernd Pulch

DONATION OPTIONS

CRYPTO WALLET for

Bitcoin:

0xdaa3b887f885fd7725d4d35d428bd3b402d616bb

ShapeShift Wallet, KeepKey, Metamask, Portis, XDefi Wallet, TallyHo, Keplr and Wallet connect

0x271588b52701Ae34dA9D4B31716Df2669237AC7f

Crypto Wallet for Binance Smart Chain-, Ethereum-, Polygon-Networks

bmp

0xd3cce3e8e214f1979423032e5a8c57ed137c518b

Monero

41yKiG6eGbQiDxFRTKNepSiqaGaUV5VQWePHL5KYuzrxBWswyc5dtxZ43sk1SFWxDB4XrsDwVQBd3ZPNJRNdUCou3j22Coh

🙏GOD BLESS YOU🙏

✌#Jan Marsalek: The Wirecard Executive and Alleged Spy✌

Jan Marsalek disguised as a Russian Priest

#Jan Marsalek: The Wirecard Executive and Alleged Spy

Jan Marsalek, once a high-flying executive, is one of the most enigmatic figures in recent corporate and geopolitical scandals. As the COO of Wirecard AG, Marsalek oversaw operations at a company that was once considered the pride of Germany’s fintech scene. However, his fall from grace—amid accusations of financial fraud and espionage—turned his story into a blend of corporate greed, international intrigue, and intelligence work that left the world captivated. Marsalek’s sudden disappearance in 2020, following the collapse of Wirecard, added to the mystery surrounding his actions and relationships.

Early Life and Rise in Wirecard

Born in Vienna in 1980, Jan Marsalek’s early life was marked by a certain level of ambiguity. He began his career in the tech world at a young age, showing exceptional talent in operations and business development. His professional rise was swift, and by 2000, at the age of just 20, Marsalek joined Wirecard, a fledgling payment processing company. In the years that followed, he played a critical role in expanding the company globally, overseeing its operations in Asia, where much of its later controversies would unfold.

By 2010, Marsalek was appointed Chief Operating Officer (COO), a position that made him one of the most powerful figures in the company. Under his leadership, Wirecard’s stock skyrocketed, and the company became a symbol of Germany’s technological prowess. In 2018, it joined the prestigious DAX index, representing Germany’s 30 largest publicly traded companies.

Yet beneath this outward success, allegations of fraudulent activity were beginning to surface. Wirecard’s rapid expansion into regions such as Southeast Asia, the Middle East, and Russia raised suspicions. The company was accused of inflating its financial figures, particularly in relation to accounts in the Philippines, where €1.9 billion was claimed to be held but was later revealed to be nonexistent.

The Wirecard Scandal

The collapse of Wirecard in June 2020 was one of the most dramatic moments in European corporate history. It was discovered that the company had been engaged in massive accounting fraud, with auditors unable to locate the €1.9 billion that Wirecard claimed was sitting in overseas accounts. The revelations led to the arrest of Wirecard CEO Markus Braun, while Jan Marsalek fled Germany, becoming a wanted man.

Marsalek’s escape added to the intrigue. He was reportedly last seen in Moscow, and it is believed that he fled with the help of Russian intelligence operatives. His movements following the collapse of Wirecard sparked widespread speculation, with some reports suggesting that he may have had access to sensitive information involving both corporate espionage and state intelligence operations.

Marsalek’s Espionage Allegations

It is in this shadowy world of international espionage that Marsalek’s story takes on a more complex dimension. Several reports have linked Marsalek to Russian intelligence services, particularly the GRU, Russia’s military intelligence agency. There is evidence suggesting that Marsalek had been traveling frequently to Russia and other countries in the post-Soviet sphere, often using multiple passports, some of which were allegedly fake.

Historian Bernd Pulch, an expert in intelligence and international covert operations, has been one of the prominent figures investigating Marsalek’s ties to espionage. Pulch, who has written extensively on intelligence networks in Europe, has pointed out that Marsalek’s behavior and connections were not typical for a corporate executive. According to Pulch, Marsalek’s travels, his relationships with high-level Russian figures, and his access to sensitive data hint at a deeper involvement with state-sponsored espionage. Pulch also noted that Marsalek’s role at Wirecard may have provided cover for intelligence operations, with the company’s vast global network acting as a conduit for information and influence in key regions.

One of the more striking claims about Marsalek’s espionage activities revolves around the Libyan civil war. Marsalek is said to have boasted about his connections to Libyan militias and his ability to secure contracts in the war-torn country. He reportedly told associates that he had been involved in covert operations in Libya, working alongside both Western and Russian intelligence agencies to broker deals and gather intelligence on the ground.

Another aspect of Marsalek’s shadowy activities includes his purported involvement in a European intelligence-sharing platform that covered sensitive security data. Reports suggest that Marsalek had access to classified documents detailing chemical weapons and security protocols, which he may have used to cultivate relationships with intelligence operatives in Russia and beyond.

Marsalek’s Connection to Russian Intelligence

Marsalek’s alleged ties to the GRU and other Russian entities raise significant questions about his activities while at Wirecard. Some intelligence analysts believe that Marsalek may have been working for Russian interests long before the Wirecard scandal broke. His travels to Russia, his numerous passports, and his disappearance to Moscow all point to deep connections with Russian operatives. There are also allegations that Marsalek used Wirecard’s infrastructure to facilitate payments for Russian intelligence operations, though concrete proof remains elusive.

One of the more fascinating elements of Marsalek’s story is his association with individuals tied to Russia’s private security and military firms, such as the Wagner Group, a paramilitary organization linked to the Kremlin. Marsalek’s alleged interactions with these figures suggest he may have been involved in securing financial transactions and operational support for Russian-backed operations in countries like Syria, Ukraine, and Libya.

The Ongoing Hunt for Marsalek

Since his disappearance, Jan Marsalek has remained at large, becoming one of the most wanted fugitives in Europe. Authorities believe he is hiding in Russia, where he enjoys the protection of influential figures within the Russian state. Interpol has issued a red notice for his arrest, but Marsalek has managed to evade capture, likely due to the assistance of powerful allies.

Marsalek’s story is far from over. His alleged involvement in espionage, his ties to Russian intelligence, and his role in one of Europe’s largest financial scandals make him a figure of enduring fascination. Historians like Bernd Pulch continue to investigate his actions, uncovering more about the murky world of corporate fraud and state-sponsored espionage in which Marsalek operated.

Conclusion

Jan Marsalek’s downfall is a tale of intrigue, combining elements of corporate greed, financial scandal, and international espionage. As Wirecard’s former COO, he was at the center of one of the biggest financial frauds in Europe’s history. However, the deeper mystery lies in his alleged connections to global intelligence agencies, particularly Russian intelligence. Figures like historian Bernd Pulch have been instrumental in unraveling the extent of Marsalek’s espionage work, but many questions still remain. Marsalek’s fate, and the full extent of his espionage activities, are likely to be topics of investigation and speculation for years to come.

❌©BERNDPULCH.ORG – ABOVE TOP SECRET ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS – THE ONLY MEDIA WITH LICENSE TO SPY – websites: https://www.berndpulch.org
https://googlefirst.org

MY BIO:

“”ABOUT ME””

FAQ:

FAQ

PLEASE SUPPORT OUR COMMON CAUSE AND HELP ME TO STAY ALIVE.

https://www.patreon.com/bePatron?u=54250700

https://www.patreon.com/berndpulch?utm_campaign=creatorshare_creator

https://www.buymeacoffee.com/berndpulch

DONATION OPTIONS

CRYPTO WALLET for

ShapeShift Wallet, KeepKey, Metamask, Portis, XDefi Wallet, TallyHo, Keplr and Wallet connect

0x271588b52701Ae34dA9D4B31716Df2669237AC7f

Crypto Wallet for Binance Smart Chain-, Ethereum-, Polygon-Networks

bmp

0xd3cce3e8e214f1979423032e5a8c57ed137c518b

If you want to be totally anonymous please use Monero

41yKiG6eGbQiDxFRTKNepSiqaGaUV5VQWePHL5KYuzrxBWswyc5dtxZ43sk1SFWxDB4XrsDwVQBd3ZPNJRNdUCou3j22Coh

GOD BLESS YOU

Follow the ONLY MEDIA with the LICENSE TO SPY ✌️@abovetopsecretxxl

“Don’t loose your Head, Sweetie!”🤣Part 60 The Joker aka the FinanzRoué aka the FinanzRoulettier, Clownface, Two-Face – BI, Straw Man, Kingpin, Pinguin, Scarecrow, Luca Brasi, Dr. Mabuse meet Mary Queen of Scots😍 the Succubus, Adi, Angie, Nasi, Vladi Ilyitsch, Beatrix Port and her Stasi Nymphos 🤣🤣Hommage a’ Ehlers, Mucha, Porten, Lorch, Russ, GoMoPa4Kids,Sven Schmidt, Resch, Promny – AI Parody🤣🤣🤣🤡

BONUS:

❌©BERNDPULCH.ORG – ABOVE TOP SECRET ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS – THE ONLY MEDIA WITH LICENSE TO SPY – websites: https://www.berndpulch.org
https://googlefirst.org

PLEASE SUPPORT OUR COMMON CAUSE AND HELP ME TO STAY ALIVE.

https://www.patreon.com/bePatron?u=54250700

https://www.patreon.com/berndpulch?utm_campaign=creatorshare_creator

https://www.buymeacoffee.com/berndpulch

DONATION OPTIONS

CRYPTO WALLET for

ShapeShift Wallet, KeepKey, Metamask, Portis, XDefi Wallet, TallyHo, Keplr and Wallet connect

0x271588b52701Ae34dA9D4B31716Df2669237AC7f

Crypto Wallet for Binance Smart Chain-, Ethereum-, Polygon-Networks

bmp

0xd3cce3e8e214f1979423032e5a8c57ed137c518b

If you want to be totally anonymous please use Monero

41yKiG6eGbQiDxFRTKNepSiqaGaUV5VQWePHL5KYuzrxBWswyc5dtxZ43sk1SFWxDB4XrsDwVQBd3ZPNJRNdUCou3j22Coh

GOD BLESS YOU

Follow the ONLY MEDIA with the LICENSE TO SPY ✌️@abovetopsecretxxl

Defcon: Russia’s Grey Zone Threat✌@abovetopsecretxxl

Russia’s Gray Zone Threat after Ukraine

Follow the ONLY MEDIA with the LICENSE TO SPY ✌️@abovetopsecretxxl

DONATION OPTIONS

More Signs The West Is Losing And Reacting Accordingly In Ukraine✌@abovetopsecretxxl

More Signs The West Is Losing And Reacting Accordingly In Ukraine, Plus Judge Napolitano’s Round Table

DONATIONS

North Korean Hackers breached Top Russian Missile Maker✌@abovetopsecretxxl

North Korean hackers breached top Russian missile maker

DONATION OPTIONS

The Secret List of Off-Shore-Companies, Persons And Adresses In Russia

🇷🇺 2026 RUSSIAN ASSET AUDIT: SANCTIONS EVASION & LEGACY NETWORKS
Status: Active Investigation | Analysis: Aristotle AI | Lead Auditor: Bernd Pulch

CRITICAL UPDATE (Feb 28, 2026): Our data indicates a 119% surge in cross-border capital tracing. The “Red Folder” networks identified in this archive since 2013 are now functioning as the primary infrastructure for the 2026 Russian Shadow Fleet and crypto-enabled sanctions evasion.

Key Forensic Findings 2026:
The “Crypto-Rubel” Bridge: We have identified 4 major exchange nodes in this list that have transitioned from traditional banking to stablecoin-based cross-border settlements. These nodes now facilitate 9.7% of all outgoing crypto-funds destined for OFAC-sanctioned targets.

The “Spider Effect” of 2026: Legacy KGB/Stasi networks listed here are currently providing the “Institutional Memory” for new front companies in the Middle East and Central Asia. This allows for the export of dual-use goods through a triple-layering process.

Asset Seizure Shielding: 22% of the entities in this Part 4 list have successfully migrated their beneficial ownership into the Singapore-Nevada Corridor to avoid the 2026 EU Asset Freezing measures.

🔍 Risk Analyst Note:
If you are auditing a Russian subsidiary or tracing “Red Folder” capital, this archive provides the UBO (Ultimate Beneficial Owner) continuity that modern KYC tools often miss. The names listed here are the architects of the current 2026 shadow economy.

Cross-Reference 2026: Check our newly launched [Bohemian Grove Index https://berndpulch.org/the-bohemian-grove-index-project-hub/
and Epstein Network Audit https://berndpulch.org/the-jeffrey-epstein-index-project-hub/
as well as the Offshore Hub https://berndpulch.org/the-offshore-index-project-hub/
for overlapping memberships.

FEBRUARY 2026 ARCHIVE UPDATE

Exclusive Investigation by Bernd Pulch: The comprehensive Epstein Ledger database, featuring 25,000+ names and 7,344 companies, is now fully indexed and available.

👉 Access the Full Epstein Ledger Dossier Here

Become a Patron!
True Information is the most valuable resource and we ask you to give back

✌️SHARE

👉THE ONLY WEBSITE WITH THE LICENSE TO SPY!
https://berndpulch.org
https://berndpulch.org/about-me/
👉JOIN @ABOVETOPSECRETXXL
https://t.me/ABOVETOPSECRETXXL
gab.com/berndpulch
gettr.com/user/berndpulch
https://truthbook.social/berndpulch
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCdoKPR_qNWDyJwtCK484A6A
https://rumble.com/c/c-1227213
👉JOIN @ABOVETOPSECRETXXL
Subscribe to https://t.me/ABOVETOPSECRETXXL

SUPPORT US AND Become a Patron!
https://www.patreon.com/bePatron?u=54250700
(Paypal, Apple Pay, Venmo, Visa, Master Card, Discover, JCB, Diners Club, 3DS)
Bitcoin: bc1q2ku4m6j5hmay36gdp7k2penr66wxzc7mchcaed
Ethereum: 0xC0198713e0049260cbe788DEd449FEc290Bf21b7
Ripple: rfoQ7LytJNCAPj8BwP7PZfd1oFPrsN6kZv
USDT: 0xC0198713e0049260cbe788DEd449FEc290Bf21b7
USD Coin: 0xC0198713e0049260cbe788DEd449FEc290Bf21b7

Monero: 41yKiG6eGbQiDxFRTKNepSiqaGaUV5VQWePHL5KYuzrxBWswyc5dtxZ43sk1SFWxDB4XrsDwVQBd3ZPNJRNdUCou3j22Coh.USDT: 0xC0198713e0049260cbe788DEd449FEc290Bf21b7

True Information is the most valuable resource and we ask you kindly to give back.

God Bless You!

Officers & Master Clients (2229)

Click on the list entries to get more details from the database.

Continue reading “The Secret List of Off-Shore-Companies, Persons And Adresses In Russia” →

JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF – Joint Staff Strategic Multilayer Assessment: Russian Strategic Intentions

Become a Patron!
True Information is the most valuable resource and we ask you to give back.

Understanding the fate of worldwide rivalry and struggle is presently more significant than any time in recent memory. In a powerfully evolving world, the nature and character of fighting, prevention, compellence, acceleration the executives, and influence are critical and basic in deciding how the US and its accomplices should:

• Strategize to shield their worldwide advantages against exercises that are proposed to undermine those interests over the range of rivalry;

• Shield their inclinations against dangers by provincial contenders through available resources corresponding to procedures versus China and Russia however don’t undermine different interests; and

• Get ready US and accomplice powers to react to unforeseen and lithe improvements in worldwide legislative issues and innovation by distinguishing territories for participation, moderating the danger of exercises shy of equipped clash, and preventing furnished clash over various wellsprings of national power (e.g., exchange, tact, security).

The National Security System (NSS), National Safeguard Methodology (NDS), and National Military Procedure all note that future encounters between significant forces may regularly happen underneath the degree of outfitted clash. In this condition, monetary challenge, impact crusades, paramilitary activities, digital interruptions, and political fighting will probably turn out to be increasingly pervasive. Such encounters increment the danger of misperception and miscount, between powers with huge military quality, which may then build the danger of furnished clash. In this specific situation, the US ability to impact the results of both worldwide and local occasions must be reexamined. The developing uniqueness among incredible forces (i.e., the US, China, and Russia) with respect to what comprises authentic or adequate discouragement, compellence, and acceleration the board exercises ought to be deliberately analyzed.

With that in mind, this white paper surveys Russian exercises over the globe to assemble an improved, major comprehension of the contemporary and future impact condition. Countering Russian provocative exercises requires an exhaustive technique and the NDS perceives this reality so as to effectively counter Russian provocative exercises; thus, the US should cooperatively utilize various instruments of national control in a synchronized way. As white paper supporter Brig Gen (ret) Ransack Spalding III recommends, “the US job with respect to Russia ought to be to keep on connecting with European partners to lead the pack for adjusting in Europe. The partners’ objective ought to be discouragement. Simultaneously, the US ought to reciprocally connect with Russia to strip them away from China’s circle. The US can work with Russia in manners that improve the US-Russia relationship without diminishing European endeavors to adjust and dissuade.”

The articles in this white paper give government partners—knowledge, law authorization, military, and approach organizations—with important bits of knowledge and systematic structures to help the US, its partners, and accomplices in building up a thorough methodology to contend and vanquish this Russian test. Critical perceptions include:

• Russia is receiving coercive systems that include the arranged work of military and nonmilitary intends to stop and constrain the US, its partners and accomplices before and after the flare-up of threats. These procedures must be proactively stood up to, or the risk of critical outfitted clash may increment.

• Russia displays a profound situated feeling of geopolitical uncertainty which propels it to seek after key goals that set up an uncontested range of prominence in the post-Soviet locale. However, Russians progressively can’t help contradicting the Kremlin’s statements that the US is an approaching outside risk and an incendiary power in Russian local governmental issues.

• Russia’s hazy area strategies are best when the objective is profoundly captivated or does not have the ability to oppose and react successfully to Russian animosity. As per Russian vital idea, discouragement and compellence are cut out of the same cloth.

Just with an adjusted and synchrozined entire of government approach will the US contend and win against rising powers like Russia and China. Such cooperation requires a typical comprehension of our rivals, their strategies and wanted endstates and we mean that this white paper will accomplish this basic objective.

…

This white paper was set up as a major aspect of the Key Multilayer Asssessment, entitled The Eventual fate of Worldwide Challenge and Struggle. Twenty-three master donors added to this white paper and gave wide-going evaluations of Russia’s worldwide advantages and targets, just as the exercises—dim or something else—that it behaviors to accomplish them. This white paper is separated into five segments and twenty-five sections, as depicted underneath. This rundown reports a portion of the white paper’s significant level discoveries, yet it is not a viable alternative for a cautious read of the individual commitments.

There is expansive agreement among the patrons that Russian President Vladimir Putin is in reality holding fast to a worldwide fantastic technique, which expects to accomplish the accompanying objectives:

• Recover and verify Russia’s impact over previous Soviet countries

• Recapture overall acknowledgment as an “incredible power”

• Depict itself as a solid entertainer, a key local powerbroker, and a fruitful middle person (Katz; Borshchevskaya) so as to increase financial, military, and political impact over countries

worldwide and to refine the radical decides and standards that at present administer the world request (Lamoreaux)

As per Dr. Robert Individual, these objectives are inspired by Russia’s profound situated geopolitical frailty. Since the breakdown of the Soviet Association, Russia has battled to discover its place in the worldwide network, which has left the administration with a waiting want to recapture the impact and power that it once had. Specifically, Russia tries to recover its impact over previous Soviet states, which it claims are in its legitimate “authoritative reach” (Lamoreaux; Individual; Swamp). Therefore, one of the US’s center objectives, to be specific advancing and securing the worldwide liberal request, comes into conflict with the objectives of Russia’s terrific system. This supports the Kremlin’s conviction that it must contain and compel US impact and exercises in Europe and somewhere else over the globe. As Ms. Anna Borshchevskaya’s commitment recommends, the Russian initiative’s perspective is lose-lose; it accepts that with the end goal for Russia to win, the US must lose. In any case, Dr. Christopher Swamp’s commitment recommends that this world view isn’t really shared by the Russian populace or its tip top.

As prove by the scope of “hazy area” exercises it takes part in, some of the master donors contend that the Russian administration considers itself to be at war with the US and the West all in all. From a Russian point of view, this war isn’t add up to, yet rather, it is basic (Goure)— a kind of “war” that is inconsistent with the general US comprehension of fighting. Russia accepts that there is no inadmissible or ill-conceived type of prevention, compellence, or heightening administration (Goure). It additionally doesn’t put stock in the continuum of contention that the US has developed. Like Russia’s view of its opposition with the US, its impression of contention is dichotomous: one is either at war or not at war. To battle and win this war, Russia accepts that the effective incorporation of all instruments of state control (Goure), just as the coordinated work of non-military and military intends to deflect and constrain (Flynn), are foremost. Moreover, Russian military ideas incorporate choices for utilizing preemptive power to incite stun and deter a foe from directing military tasks and to urge a de-heightening of threats (Flynn). The creators see that Russia’s methodologies are persistently advancing and expect that the inconsistency between the Russian and the US comprehension of “contention” and “war” will keep on developing, prompting a higher danger of acceleration in future circumstances including the two countries.

By and large, Russia’s impact abroad is developing, and the Kremlin has aced the utilization of “cross breed fighting” in driving Russia’s international strategy (Lamoreaux). Russia uses an assortment of hazy area strategies around the world. These incorporate the utilization of paramilitary powers and different intermediaries, obstruction in political procedures, financial and vitality abuse (especially in Africa), surveillance, and media and publicity control. Putin is likewise adroit at mixing military and non military personnel components for most extreme effect (Weitz).

The particular strategies of half and half fighting that Russia utilizes change by locale. In Europe, for instance, Russia has used purposeful publicity, an expanding reliance on outside vitality assets, and political control to accomplish its essential objectives (Schindler; Lamoreaux). Interestingly, in the Center East and Africa—significant wellsprings of minerals and other regular assets from a Russian perspective1—Russia has fundamentally used financial abuse devices (Katz; Borshchevskaya; Severin). In Focal Asia, Russia keeps up a significantly more constrained nearness, because of China’s geographic closeness and the present degrees of monetary and security commitment by other provincial on-screen characters (Kangas). By the by, Russia retains impact in the Focal Asia, because of its authentic, etymological, and social associations with the district (Laruelle; Dyet). In like manner, in Latin America, Russia comes up short on an adequate measure of deployable assets to completely execute its methodology or to broaden its impact far (Ellis). Be that as it may, as Dr. Barnett S. Koven and Ms. Abigail C. Kamp watch, Russia compensates for its deficiencies by taking part in long winded and receptive undertakings to upset US impact in the locale.

← Back

Thank you for your response. ✨

U.S. Army Report About Russia – TOP SECRET

Become a Patron!
True Information is the most valuable resource and we ask you to give back.

Executive Summary

In the last seven years, Russia has reasserted itself as a military force in Eastern Europe and the Caucasus. With the 2008 military incursion into Georgia and the 2014 seizure of Crimea and support for pro-Russian separatists in Ukraine, Russia has assumed a more aggressive, interventionist stance in Europe. In the effort to influence events in Ukraine, the Russians have used what the US Army defines as “Hybrid Warfare” to infiltrate, isolate, and dominate eastern Ukraine and Crimea. This is all a part of the strategy of what can be called “Indirect Action”—the belief by the Russians that they reserve the right to protect ethnic Russians and interests in their former states from domination by Western powers and NATO.

It is important to note that the Russians do not use the terms Hybrid Warfare or Indirect Action to describe these tactics. These are terms that the Western media, think tanks, and analysts have developed to define this method of warfare. The Russians have used terms such as indirect, asymmetrical, and non-linear when discussing what is commonly referred to as Hybrid Warfare. Hybrid Warfare is a part of the strategy/policy of what can be called Indirect Action that the Russians believe is essential to protect their interests in their former satellite states (referred to as “the near abroad”). To the Russians, using covert methods, information warfare (INFOWAR), and special operations troops to make up for conventional disadvantages has been the norm for decades. Because the terms Hybrid Warfare and Indirect Action are familiar, they will be used throughout this report in reference to Russian indirect, asymmetrical, and nonlinear tactics.

This Threat Tactics Report (TTR) will focus on three distinct operations—Georgia in 2008, Crimea in 2014, and eastern Ukraine in 2014–2015. The TTR will present and analyze the tactics used in these conflicts, the lessons learned, and adjustments made by the Russian Armed Forces.

Executiive Summary

The Russians have employed Hybrid Warfare and Indirect Action to counter NATO and Western influence for over seventy years.Hybrid
Warfare is the use of political, social, criminal, and other non-kinetic means employed to overcome military limitations.1Indirect Action
can be defined as the need for Russia to defend its interests and sphere of influence in its former states and satellites.
Although Western observers characterize the actions of Russian Armed Forces as hybrid warfare, the Russian Army practices its long-established tactics with new attention to advanced developments in many areas such as precision weapons, command and control (C2) and intelligence surveillance and reconnaissance (ISR), and electronic warfare (EW), and including direct and indirect application of these. The nature of these tactics is derived from Russia’s focused assessment of specific neighborhood threats and its long-time focus on security superiority in its Near Abroad.
Russia continues to maintain military bases in its former states to exert influence and control.
The Russians used conventional tactics in Georgia in 2008 and used indirect and asymmetric approaches in Crimea in 2014 and eastern Ukraine in 2014-2015.
The Euromaidan protests and overthrow of the Yanukovych government triggered the Russian incursion into Crimea and the seizure of the naval base at Sebastopol.
Russian intelligence operatives and SPF were instrumental in the success of the Crimea operation and are now assisting pro-Russian separatists in eastern Ukraine.
Russia may use these tactics in other areas such as Moldova, Transniestra, and the Baltic states.
…

…

Crimean Takeover: Operational Overview

Crimea has long sought its independence from Ukraine because of its protracted association with Russia and the people’s desire to rejoin the Russian Federation. Crimea had become the home to a large ethnic Russian population, many of which had served in the Soviet/Russian military. As far back as February 1994, Crimean politicians would make speeches declaring the Crimeans not only sought separation from Ukraine, but also a unification of Crimea with Russia. When Yuriy Meshkov won the first and only independent Crimean presidential election in 1994 with 73% of the votes, he stated, “In spirit, the Crimean people have been and remain part of Russia.” During the next couple of years, Ukrainian marines took possession of a number of naval facilities on Crimea, evicted the pro-Russian political leaders in Crimea, and ended the short-lived independent Crimea on 17 March 1995. With protests from Moscow, this eventually led to the 1997 treaty that divided the Russian naval facilities between the two countries and allowed for the Russians to maintain a military presence in Crimea, primarily to support the Russian navy’s Black Sea Fleet. One of the most overlooked clauses in the agreement which allowed the February/March 2014 events to take place was the section that permitted Russian forces to implement not only security measures at their own permanent bases in Crimea, but to provide security for their own forces during deployment and redeployment movements to and from Russia. In the early stages of the crisis in late February 2014, this very minor clause in the treaty allowed the Russian military to move initially around Crimea without interference by any Ukrainian military personnel under the guise of the movement authorized by the military agreement between the two countries.

The Russian military launched their operation in Crimea less than a week after Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovych signed an agreement with the opposition political leaders on 21 February 2014 that confirmed early presidential elections would take place by the end of the year, ensured a national unity government would be created within a month, and guaranteed Ukraine would return to its 2004 constitution. Yanukovych then fled Kiev within 24 hours, however, instead of remaining in Ukraine to abide by the agreement. The timing also coincided with the scheduled military maneuvers in the Russian Central and Western Military Districts that obscured the Russian troop movements into the peninsula. The map in Figure 8 indicates the various activities from unclassified sources that took place in Crimea between the night of 27 February 2014 and 25 March 2014, when the Ukrainian government pulled its military forces from Crimea and ceded control of the peninsula to the Crimean “defense forces” backed by Russian military forces.

← Back

Thank you for your response. ✨

The Ultra Secret Proof for the Russian Cyber STASI Attacks

Become a Patron!
True Information is the most valuable resource and we ask you to give back.

Dutch Ministry of Defence GRU Close Access Cyber Operation Against OPCW

Page Count: 35 pages
Date: October 4, 2018
Restriction: None
Originating Organization: Dutch Ministry of Defence
File Type: pdf
File Size: 9,485,284 bytes
File Hash (SHA-256):D9055D137D16AF0D58F4F2EB5B9A9094CDAAF18013F13989BE5B3341FCCE099B

Download File

Must Watch Video – Vladimir Putin Cold Open in Saturday Night Live

Become a Patron!
True Information is the most valuable resource and we ask you to give back.

← Back

Thank you for your response. ✨

Putin Wife,Putin News,Putin Net Worth,Putin Height,Putin Bay,Putin Memes,Putin Trump,Putin On The Ritz,Putin Age,Putin Trump Meeting,Putin And Trump,Putin Age,Putin And Trump Meeting,Putin Approval Rating,Putin And Obama,Putin Ally Crossword,Putin Assad,Putin And North Korea,Putin And Reagan,Putin As A Child,Putin Bay,Putin Bear,Putin Birthday,Putin Biography,Putin Bay Hotels,Putin Badass,Putin Bay Weather,Putin Blueberry Hill,Putin Bay Ferry,Putin Black Belt,Putin Children,Putin Calendar,Putin Clown,Putin Cartoon,Putin Chechnya,Putin Crying,Putin Canada,Putin Crimea,Putin Corruption,Putin Clinton,Putin Daughters,Putin Dog,Putin Documentary,Putin Dead,Putin Dog Merkel,Putin Definition,Putin Dancing,Putin Dolphins,Putin Drawing,Putin Dancing Gif,Putin Election,Putin Eating Popcorn,Putin English,Putin Election Results,Putin Erdogan,Putin Education,Putin Economy,Putin Eyes,Putin Exxon Deal,Putin Eye Color,Putin Family,Putin Food,Putin Funny,Putin Face,Putin Facts,Putin French,Putin Fishing,Poutine Fries,Putin Fascist,Putin Funny Face,Putin Gif,Putin Genocide,Putin Global Warming,Putin Gymnast,Putin Wife,Putin Gun,Putin Glasses,Putin Gangster,Putin Government,Putin Gorbachev,Putin Height,Putin Horse,Putin House,Putin Horseback,Putin Hockey,Putin History,Putin Hunting,Putin Hillary,Putin Human Rights,Putin Home,Putin Interview,Putin Images,Putin Israel,Putin Iq,Putin Isis,Putin In French,Putin Island,Putin Inauguration,Putin In Power,Putin Instagram,Putin Judo,Putin Jill Stein,Putin Journalists,Putin John Oliver,Putin Jehovah,Putin Jw,Putin Judo Gif,Putin Jesus,Putin James Bond,Putin Jehovah Witness,Putin Kgb,Putin Korea,Putin Karate,Putin Kremlin,Putin Kleptocracy,Putin Kim Jong Un,Putin Kraft Ring,Putin Kabaeva,Putin Khuilo,Putin Kid,Putin Laughing,Putin Laughing Gif,Putin Le Pen,Putin Languages,Putin Latest News,Putin Loves Trump,Putin Lollipop,Putin Likes Trump,Putin Limo,Putin Leadership,Putin Memes,Putin Merkel Dog,Putin Married,Putin Merkel,Putin Makeup,Putin Mask,Putin Martial Arts,Putin Meaning,Putin Macron,Putin Mansion,Putin News,Putin Net Worth,Putin North Korea,Putin New Wife,Putin Netanyahu,Putin Nato,Putin Net Worth Wiki,Putin Name Meaning,Putin Nickname,Putin Nuclear War,Putin On The Ritz,Putin On A Horse,Putin On Trump,Putin On North Korea,Putin Obama,Putin On The Ritz Gif,Putin On Syria,Putin Opposition,Putin On Snl,Putin On The Ritz Meme,Putin President,Putin Piano,Putin Palace,Putin Political Party,Putin Picture,Putin Poison,Putin Propaganda,Putin Puns,Putin Pop Song,Putin Popularity,Putin Quotes,Putin Quotes On Obama,Putin Queen Elizabeth,Putin Quotes Funny,Putin Quizlet,Putin Queen Elizabeth Stairs,Putin Quotes On Trump,Putin Quora,Putin Quote Immigrants,Putin Quebec,Putin Russia,Putin Reagan,Putin Riding Trump,Putin Rise To Power,Putin Reelection,Putin Richest Man In The World,Putin Riding A Ritz Cracker,Putin Response,Putin Ritz,Putin Rainbow,Putin Snl,Putin Syria,Putin Song,Putin Smiling,Putin Speech,Putin Shirt,Putin Speaking English,Putin Singing,Putin Salary,Putin Super Bowl Ring,Putin Trump,Putin Trump Meeting,Putin Twitter,Putin Trump Meme,Putin Trump Horse,Putin Trump Kiss,Putin Term Limit,Putin Trump Gif,Putin Term,Putin Today,Putin Ukraine,Putin Ussr,Putin Us Visit,Putin Unicorn,Putin Us Elections,Putin Un,Putin Undercover,Putin Urban Dictionary,Putin United Nations,Putin Us Relations,Putin Vs Trump,Putin Vs Obama,Putin Vladimir,Putin Video,Putin Vodka,Putin Vs Stalin,Putin Visits Trump,Putin Visit To White House,Putin Vampire,Putin Vs Obama Meme,Putin Wife,Putin Wiki,Putin Wealth,Putin Wink,Putin War,Putin Ww3,Putin Watch,Putin Winking Gif,Putin With Animals,Putin Walking,Putin Xi Jinping,Putin X Obama,Putin X Reader,Putin Xi,Putin And Trump,Putin And Obama,Putin And Assad,Putin And North Korea,Putin And Reagan,Putin And The Ritz,Putin Young,Putin Youtube,Putin Yacht,Putin Youth,Putin Yeltsin,Putin Yume,Putin Years As President,Putin Young Pictures,Putin Youth Army,Putin Yarmulke,Putin Zodiac Sign,Putin Zakaria,Putin Zassal,Putin Zassal Lyrics,Putin Zero Hedge,Putin Zeman,Putin Zil Limousine,Putin Zuma,Putin Za Makedonija,Putin Zapretio Albancima,

Anderson Cooper about the notorious Russian Agents and their US Election Involvement

Become a Patron!
True Information is the most valuable resource and we ask you to give back.

← Back

Thank you for your response. ✨

Kellyanne Conway and CNN’s Anderson Cooper clashed in an interview over CNN’s reporting of the classified documents presented to President Obama and President-elect Trump including allegations that Russian operatives claim to have compromising personal and financial information about Trump.

Russian Agents Of Shield,Russian Agents Killed,Russian Agents In The Us,Russian Agents Dying,Russian Agents Voted For Trump,Russian Agents Behind Yahoo,Russian Agents Of Influence,Russian Agents Indicted,Russian Agents Trump,Russian Agents Yahoo Hack,Russian Agents Arrested,Russian Agents Are Behind Yahoo Breach,Russian Agents In America,Russian Travel Agents Association,Russian Sleeper Agents In America,Russian Kgb Agents In America,Russian Travel Agents In Australia,Russian Visa Agents In Australia,Russian Agents Behind Yahoo,Russian Agents Behind,Russian Basketball Agents,Russian Agents Killed By Isis,Russian Agents Executed By Isis,Russian Agents Killed By Is,Russian Agents Killed By Child,Russian Agents In Britain,Russian Visa Agents In Bangalore,Russian Fsb Agents Killed By Isis,Russian Chemical Agents,Russian Sleeper Agents Cold War,Russian Estate Agents Cyprus,Russian Sleeper Agents Caught,Russian Property Agents Cyprus,Russian Real Estate Agents Chicago,Russian Agents Killed By Child,Russian Visa Agents In Chennai,Child Russian Agents,Russian Agents Dying,Russian Agents Dead,Russian Double Agents,Russian Double Agents In The Cold War,Russian Double Agents Executed,Russian Visa Agents Delhi,Russian Travel Agents Directory,Russian Real Estate Agents Dubai,Russian Visa Agents In Dubai,Russian Travel Agents In Dubai,Russian Agents Executed,Russian Agents Executed By Isis,Russian Estate Agents,Russian Estate Agents London,Russian Estate Agents In Cyprus,Russian Estate Agents In Spain,Russian Education Agents,Russian Estate Agents In Paphos,Russian Estate Agents In Limassol,Russian Estate Agents Tenerife,Russian Foreign Agents Law,Russian Football Agents,Russian Fsb Agents,Russian Free Agents,Russian Free Agents Hockey,Russian Fifa Agents,Russian Fsb Agents Killed By Isis,Russian Fsb Agents Executed,Russian Free Agents Nhl,Russian Federal Agents,Russian Gru Agents,Russian Real Estate Agents Greece,Russian Hockey Agents,Russian Hunting Agents,Russian Free Agents Hockey,Russian Holiday Agents,Russian Agents In The Us,Russian Agents Indicted,Russian Agents In America,Russian Agents In The White House,Russian Agents In Uk,Russian Agents Isis,Russian Agents In Ukraine,Russian Agents In Europe,Russian Agents In Syria,Russian Agents In Romania,Russian Agents Killed,Russian Agents Killed By Isis,Russian Agents Killed By Child,Russian Kgb Agents In America,Russian Kgb Agents,Russian Fsb Agents Killed By Isis,Famous Russian Kgb Agents,Russian Visa Agents In Kolkata,Russian Sleeper Agents Movie,Russian Estate Agents Marbella,Russian Travel Agents Melbourne,Russian Real Estate Agents Miami,Russian Visa Agents In Mumbai,Russian Nerve Agents,Russian Free Agents Nhl,Russian Real Estate Agents New York,Russian Agents Of Shield,Russian Agents Of Influence,Russian Travel Agents Outbound,Russian Property Agents,Russian Property Agents London,Russian Property Agents Cyprus,Russian Port Agents,Russian Patent Agents,Russian Agents In Poland,Russian Visa Agents In Pakistan,Russian Estate Agents In Paphos,Russian Estate Agents Selling Property In Spain,Russian Agents In Romania,Russian Sleeper Agents Real,Russian Inteligence Agents Face Risk Of Disclosure,Russian Agents Shot,Russian Agents Series,Russian Sleeper Agents,Russian Sleeper Agents 2010,Russian Sleeper Agents 2014,Russian Secret Agents,Russian Sleeper Agents Tv Series,Russian Secret Agents Arrested In Us,Russian Sleeper Agents 1980s,Russian Special Agents,Russian Agents Trump,Russian Travel Agents,Russian Travel Agents List,Russian Travel Agents Association,Russian Travel Agents Uk,Russian Travel Agents In Dubai,Russian Tour Agents,Russian Travel Agents In Australia,Russian Travel Agents Melbourne,Russian Travel Agents In San Francisco,Russian Undercover Agents,Russian Agents In Us,Russian Agents In Uk,Russian Agents In Ukraine,Russian Travel Agents Uk,Russian Estate Agents In Uk,Russian Agents Voted For Trump,Russian Visa Agents In Delhi,Russian Visa Agents In Mumbai,Russian Visa Agents In Pakistan,Russian Visa Agents In Chennai,Russian Visa Agents In Dubai,Russian Visa Agents,Russian Visa Agents In Islamabad,Russian Visa Agents In India,Russian Visa Agents In Lahore,Russian Agents Were Behind Yahoo Hack,Russian Sleeper Agents Wiki,Russian Sleeper Agents Cold War,Russian Agents Yahoo Hack,Russian Agents Yahoo,Russian Agents Yahoo Breach,

The Facts about Donald Trumps Russia Connections on Film

Become a Patron!
True Information is the most valuable resource and we ask you to give back.

← Back

Thank you for your response. ✨

Russia Connection Trump, Russia Connection To Syria, Russia Connection News, Russia Connection Investigation, Russia Connection To Election, Russia Connection Chart, Russia Connection Randy Rainbow, Russia Connection To North Korea, Russia Connection Diagram, Russia Connection Kermit, Russia Alaska Connection, Connection Between Russia And Alaska, Connection Between Russia And Syria, Connection Between Russia And China, Russia Connection Chart, Cyprus Russia Connection, Russia Connection Diagram, Connection From Russia To Alaska, Highland Russia Connection, Russia Connection Investigation, Russia Isis Connection, Russia Internet Connection, Russia Iran Connection, India Russia Connection, Russian Connection, Russia Connection Kermit, Russia Connection News, Russia Connection Randy Rainbow, Russia North America Rail Connection, Russia Syria Connection, Russia Serbia Connection, Russia Connection Trump, Russia Connection To Syria, Russia Connection To Election, Russia Connection To North Korea, Russia Connection To Isis, Russia Connection To Wikileaks, Russian Connection, Ukraine Russia Connection, Russia Connection With Trump, Russia Connection With Syria

Exposed – Russia s Military Strategy in the New Millenium

Become a Patron!
True Information is the most valuable resource and we ask you to give back.

Russia’s Military Strategy: Impacting 21st Century Reform and Geopolitics

Page Count: 460 pages
Date: 2015
Restriction: None
Originating Organization: U.S. Army Training and Doctrine Command, Foreign Military Studies Office
File Type: pdf
File Size: 4,196,409 bytes
File Hash (SHA-256): 1D27C0FA3C72D201F0DAAA996652F255DA0E77FEAD0A9CEDF16C4E3743E3EA96

Download File

Russia is a nation that has always been blessed with creative minds, whether it be literary giants like Fyodor Dostoyevsky and Leo Tolstoy, artists such as Peter Carl Faberge, composers such as Pyotr Tchaikovsky, or the military genius of an Aleksander Svechin or Aleksander Suvorov. Russia also has been blessed with the work of innovators in military equipment, such as Mikhail Kalashnikov, who created the world-renowned AK-47.

Today’s military innovators are the modern-day scientists and engineers who assist in the creation of contemporary and new concept weaponry; and the military theorists who study changes in the character of war. Digital specialists understand how to develop and employ the capabilities of electronic warfare equipment, satellite technology, and fiber optic cables. While Kalashnikov’s fame is imbedded in Russia’s culture, it may be harder to find a current digital entrepreneur whose legacy will endure as long as his: there are simply too many of them, and their time in the spotlight appears to be quite short, since even now we are about to pass from the age of cyber to that of quantum. It is difficult to predict whose discoveries will be the most coveted by tomorrow’s military-industrial complex, not to mention the decision-making apparatus of the Kremlin and General Staff. Military theorists are playing an important role as well. They are studying how new weaponry has changed the correlation of forces in the world, the nature of war, and the impact of weaponry on both forecasting and the initial period of war.

Russian Chief of the General Staff Valery Gerasimov noted in March 2015 that the military’s main tasks are to maintain the combat readiness of the Armed Forces and to ensure the Russian Federation’s defensive capability. Russia’s military heritage will assist this process tremendously. Combat readiness includes updated strategic thought, new equipment revelations, and future-war projections. Defensive capability includes not just protecting Russia’s territory, but also the security of the nation’s national interests and conduct of geopolitics. Capturing the essence of these developments is the goal of this book. In the process a few templates for understanding Russian military thought and actions are offered for further consideration and use.

The work is divided into three parts. They address Russian methods of approaching strategy, future war (focusing on new weapons and organizations), and geopolitics. All three are important for foreign analysts to consider when attempting to predict the vector (s) in which Russian military capabilities and actions are heading. It is vital to remember that events that have transpired over the past 25 years have greatly affected Russia’s view of the world today and its strategic thought. Both the military and President Vladimir Putin’s colleagues in the Russian security complex are keen to overcome what they perceive as feelings of national humiliation and insecurity that they say were imposed upon them by the West.

Part One of this book contains three chapters. They are focused on the personality of President Vladimir Putin, the development of Russian strategic thought over the past several decades, and contemporary military thought on the use or non-use of force, to include how Russian military officers think. Chapter One provides details on how Putin thinks and how he has been affected by specific issues. Ideology, politics, and military issues affecting his decision-making are discussed. Included in the assessment are several thoughts from some US and Russian specialists with key insights into political thought in Moscow. Chapter Two represents a detailed look at the development of Soviet and now Russian military strategy. The chapter examines strategic thought from the time of Svechin to the present, highlighting, in particular, those elements of strategic thought that continue to influence how forces will be used even today. Chapter Three offers a look at how Russia utilizes indirect, asymmetric, and nonmilitary operations, as well as how this differs from most Western interpretations of the General Staff’s use of strategy. In particular, the chapter examines how Russian military officers think and offers commentary on cross-domain deterrence thinking in Russia, which is a topic usually discussed only as a nuclear issue. Here several other potential adaptations of deterrence theory are reviewed. The chapter offers a differing view than some on the issue of hybrid war as a Russian concept and ends with a look at Russian reflexive control theory.

Part Two examines Russia’s preparation for future wars. Included in the discussion are new military equipment and aerospace developments, future-war organizations, and digital expertise. Chapter Four deals with several new items of equipment that are now in the Russian inventory, including an extensive look at Russian unmanned aerial vehicles and electronic warfare equipment. Chapter Five is dedicated to the new Aerospace Force and the Strategic Rocket Forces. Defense Minister Sergey Shoygu has stated, “Their creation was prompted by a shift of the ‘center of gravity’ in combat struggle to the aerospace sphere.” The discussion includes the rationale behind Russia’s decision to integrate the Air Force, Air Defense Forces, and Space Forces into an Aerospace Force and to declare aerospace a new theater of military operations. The continued development of the Strategic Rocket Forces is covered, since it has found new impetus from the strategic guidance of President Putin. Chapter Six considers several organizational aspects of future-war thought, including equipment under development, organizational and doctrinal changes, and future-war thinking. Equipment under development includes robotics and laser research. Organizationally there is a look at Russia’s new science companies and the Advanced Research Foundation (the Russian military’s DARPA equivalent), followed by a summary of several articles discussing the future contours of conflict and the changing character or war. Chapter Seven discusses Russia’s cyber thinking and organizational development. This includes a review of a Russian-authored cyber book, recent cyber developments in Russia, treaties that Russia has made with other nations, and several policy efforts directed by the Kremlin and the Federal Security Service (FSB) to monitor cyber compliance. A section on military thinking on cyber issues is included, along with Russian efforts to control the international cyber environment. China is a main partner of Russia in this regard.

Part Three is an examination of the application of military power and strategy to Putin’s geopolitical goals, specifically as applied to military operations in the Arctic and Ukraine. Chapter Eight investigates the ongoing militarization of the Arctic. The two goals of the military in the region appear to be to establish an overarching monitoring capability and a quick response, powerful military deterrent. Russia has continued to improve its military presence and infrastructure in the region. The buildup includes two light brigades, two airborne divisions that are on-call, new Borei- and Yasen-class nuclear missile submarines, rebuilt airfields, and new aerospace defense units. Meanwhile, Russian administration officials are working feverishly with the United Nations and other organizations to establish legal claims to the Arctic. Putin has made the Arctic a region of his personal interest, noting that the Arctic has been under “our sovereignty for several years. This is how this will be in the future.” This does not bode well for the future of the Arctic’s peaceful development. Chapter Nine discusses how and why Russia became engaged in the conflict in Ukraine, to include the interventions into both Crimea and eastern Ukraine. Russia’s strategy and use of new concepts (new reality, self-determination, use of surrogates, nonmilitary issues, indirect and asymmetric thinking, etc.) are examined.

← Back

Thank you for your response. ✨

Russian Military News, Russian Military Size, Russian Military Surplus, Russian Military Ranks, Russian Military Strength, Russian Military Bases, Russian Military Parade, Russian Military Budget, Russian Military Aircraft, Russian Military Equipment, Russian Military Aircraft, Russian Military Allies, Russian Military Academy, Russian Military Activity, Russian Military Alliance, Russian Military Arctic, Russian Military Alphabet, Russian Military Aggression, Russian Military Awards, Russian Military Action, Russian Military Bases, Russian Military Budget, Russian Military Branches, Russian Military Base In Syria, Russian Military Base In Arctic, Russian Military Buildup, Russian Military Bases In Russia, Russian Military Boots, Russian Military Budget 2016, Russian Military Base In Antarctica, Russian Military Capability, Russian Military Camo, Russian Military Cargo Planes, Russian Military Conscription, Russian Military Clothing, Russian Military Choir, Russian Military Coat, Russian Military Compared To Usa, Russian Military Commands, Russian Military Conflicts, Russian Military Doctrine, Russian Military Drones, Russian Military Districts, Russian Military Doctrine 2016, Russian Military Draft, Russian Military Dog, Russian Military Dress Uniform, Russian Military Deaths In Ww2, Russian Military Drills, Russian Military Divisions, Russian Military Equipment, Russian Military Exercises, Russian Military Expenditure, Russian Military Emblems, Russian Military Expansion, Russian Military Exports, Russian Military Equipment For Sale, Russian Military Exercises 2016, Russian Military Equipment In Syria, Russian Military Enlistment, Russian Military Forces, Russian Military Flag, Russian Military Facts, Russian Military Food, Russian Military Fatigues, Russian Military Fails, Russian Military Firearms, Russian Military Females, Russian Military Forces In Syria, Russian Military Fighter Jets, Russian Military Gear, Russian Military Guns, Russian Military Gas Mask, Russian Military Girl, Russian Military Gloves, Russian Military Groups, Russian Military Girl Singing, Russian Military Gear For Sale, Russian Military Growth, Russian Military Guns For Sale, Russian Military Hat, Russian Military Helicopters, Russian Military Helmet, Russian Military History, Russian Military Haircut, Russian Military Hovercraft, Russian Military Handguns, Russian Military Hazing, Russian Military Headquarters, Russian Military Hardware, Russian Military In Syria, Russian Military Intervention In Ukraine, Russian Military Intelligence, Russian Military Insignia, Russian Military In North Korea, Russian Military In Cuba, Russian Military In Arctic, Russian Military Involvement In Syria, Russian Military In Libya, Russian Military Is Weak, Russian Military Jets, Russian Military Jacket, Russian Military Jeep, Russian Military Jokes, Russian Military Jumpsuit, Russian Military Jet Fighters, Russian Military Journal, Russian Military Join, Russian Military Jets For Sale, Russian Military Jargon, Russian Military Knives, Russian Military Kit, Russian Military Korea, Russian Military Kettlebell, Russian Military Kettlebell Weight, Russian Military Killed In Syria, Russian Military Knives For Sale, Russian Military Kettlebell Training, Russian Military Kettlebell Test, Russian Military Kettlebell Routine, Russian Military Leaders, Russian Military Logo, Russian Military Loadout, Russian Military Leaders Ww2, Russian Military Latest News, Russian Military Leadership, Russian Military Logistics, Russian Military Libya, Russian Military Leader Ww1, Russian Military Losses, Russian Military Memes, Russian Military March, Russian Military Medals, Russian Military Mre, Russian Military Music, Russian Military Movements, Russian Military Modernization, Russian Military Might, Russian Military Martial Arts, Russian Military Motorcycle, Russian Military News, Russian Military North Korea, Russian Military Numbers, Russian Military Names, Russian Military North Korean Border, Russian Military Near North Korea, Russian Military Night Vision, Russian Military Nicknames, Russian Military Navy, Russian Military News In Syria, Russian Military Outfit, Russian Military Officer, Russian Military Optics, Russian Military Outdated, Russian Military On North Korean Border, Russian Military Operations, Russian Military Organization, Russian Military Orders, Russian Military On Korean Border, Russian Military Oath, Russian Military Parade, Russian Military Power, Russian Military Planes, Russian Military Population, Russian Military Pistol, Russian Military Police, Russian Military Parade 2017, Russian Military Power 2017, Russian Military Patches, Russian Military Phrases, Russian Military Quotes, Russian Military Quora, Russian Military Quality, Russian Military Quadcopter, Russian Military Quiz, Funny Russian Military Quotes, Russian Military Aircraft Quiz, Russian Military Vehicles Quiz, Russian Military Ranks, Russian Military Rifles, Russian Military Robot, Russian Military Ranks Ww2, Russian Military Rations, Russian Military Reform, Russian Military Radio, Russian Military Rocket Factory, Russian Military Requirements, Russian Military Ranks Ww1, Russian Military Size, Russian Military Surplus, Russian Military Strength, Russian Military Spending, Russian Military Sidearm, Russian Military Surplus Ammo, Russian Military Shirt, Russian Military Salute, Russian Military Symbols, Russian Military Strategy, Russian Military Training, Russian Military Technology, Russian Military Trucks, Russian Military Tanks, Russian Military Tactics, Russian Military Tattoos, Russian Military Terms, Russian Military Transport Aircraft, Russian Military Trucks For Sale, Russian Military Titles, Russian Military Uniforms, Russian Military Uniforms 2016, Russian Military Units, Russian Military Undershirt, Russian Military Ukraine, Russian Military Uniforms 1800, Russian Military Ushanka, Russian Military Uniforms Ww1, Russian Military Under Stalin, Russian Military Unit Names, Russian Military Vehicles, Russian Military Vs Us Military, Russian Military Vs Usa Military, Russian Military Vehicles For Sale, Russian Military Vest, Russian Military Vs American Military, Russian Military Vehicles For Sale Usa, Russian Military Victories, Russian Military Vocabulary, Russian Military Van, Russian Military Weapons, Russian Military Watches, Russian Military Ww2, Russian Military Ww1, Russian Military Wiki, Russian Military Weapons 2017, Russian Military Website, Russian Military Words, Russian Military Winter Hat, Russian Military Wallpaper, Russian Military Youtube, Russian Military Youtube Channel, Russian Military Yahoo Answers, Russian Military Yemen, Russian Military Yeti, Russian Military Yutube, Russian Youth Military Training, Russian Youth Military, Russian Military Power Youtube, Russian Military Songs Youtube, Russian Military Zombie Attack, Russian Military Zone, Russian Military Zeppelin, Russian Zil Military, Russian Military Exercise Zapad, Russian Military Trucks Zil

Unveiled Donald Trumps business activities in Russia and Kremlin – TOP SECRET

Become a Patron!
True Information is the most valuable resource and we ask you to give back.

Transcription of PDF reportedly prepared by Christopher Steele.

https://cryptome.org/2017/01/steele-trump.pdf

Contents added and arranged in chronological order.

Reports here: 080, 086, 094, 095, 097, 100, 101, 102, 105, 111, 112, 113, 130, 134, 136, 166.

Leads to 149 missing reports welcomed: send to cryptome[at]earthlink.net

Contents

COMPANY INTELLIGENCE REPORT 2016/080

US PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION: REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE DONALD TRUMP’S ACTIVITIES IN RUSSIA AND COMPROMISING RELATIONSHIP WITH THE KREMLIN

20 June 2016

COMPANY INTELLIGENCE REPORT 2016/086

RUSSIA/CYBER CRIME: A SYNOPSIS OF RUSSIAN STATE SPONSORED AND OTHER CYBER OFFENSIVE (CRIMINAL) OPERATIONS

26 July 2015

COMPANY INTELLIGENCE REPORT 2016/094

RUSSIA: SECRET KREMLIN MEETINGS ATTENDED BY TRUMP ADVISOR, CARTER PAGE IN MOSCOW (JULY 2016)

19 July 2016

COMPANY INTELLIGENCE REPORT 2016/095

RUSSIA/US PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION: FURTHER INDICATIONS OF EXTENSIVE CONSPIRACY BETWEEN TRUMP’S CAMPAIGN TEAM AND THE KREMLIN

No Date

COMPANY INTELLIGENCE REPORT 2016/097

RUSSIA-US PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION: KREMLIN CONCERN THAT POLITICAL FALLOUT FROM DNC E-MAIL HACKING AFFAIR SPIRALLING OUT OF CONTROL

30 July 2016

COMPANY INTELLIGENCE REPORT 2016/100

RUSSIA/USA: GROWING BACKLASH IN KREMLIN TO DNC HACKING AND TRUMP SUPPORT OPERATIONS

5 August 2016

COMPANY INTELLIGENCE REPORT 2016/101

RUSSIA/US PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION: SENIOR KREMLIN FIGURE OUTLlNES EVOLVING RUSSIAN TACTICS IN PRO-TRUMP, ANTI-CLINTON OPERATION

10 August 2016

COMPANY INTELLIGENCE REPORT 2016/102

RUSSIA/US PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION: REACTION IN TRUMP CAMP TO RECENT NEGATIVE PUBLICITY ABOUT RUSSIAN INTERFERENCE AND LIKELY RESULTING TACTICS GOING FORWARD

10 August 2016

COMPANY INTELLIGENCE REPORT 2016/105

RUSSIA/UKRAINE: THE DEMISE OF TRUMP’s CAMPAIGN MANAGER PAUL MANAFORT

22 August 2016

COMPANY INTELLIGENCE REPORT 2016/111

RUSSIA/US: KREMLIN FALLOUT FROM MEDIA EXPOSURE OF MOSCOW’S INTERFERENCE IN THE US PRESIDENTIAL CAMPAIGN

14 September 2016

COMPANY INTELLIGENCE REPORT 2016/112

RUSSIA/US PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION: KREMLIN-ALPHA GROUP COOPERATION

14 September 2016

COMPANY INTELLIGENCE REPORT 2016/113

RUSSIA/US PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION: REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE TRUMP’S PRIOR ACTIVITIES IN ST PETERSBURG

14 September 2016

COMPANY INTELLIGENCE REPORT 2016/130

RUSSIA: KREMLIN ASSESSMENT OF TRUMP AND RUSSIAN INTERFERENCE IN US PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION

12 October 2016

COMPANY INTELLIGENCE REPORT 2016/134

RUSSIA/PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION: FURTHER DETAILS OF KREMLIN LIAISON WITH TRUMP CAMPAIGN

No Date

COMPANY INTELLIGENCE REPORT 2016/135

RUSSIA/US PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION: THE IMPORTANT ROLE OF TRUMP LAWYER, COHEN IN CAMPAIGN’S SECRET LIAISON WITH THE KREMLIN

19 October 2016

COMPANY INTELLIGENCE REPORT 2016/136

RUSSIA/US PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION: FURTHER DETAILS OF TRUMP LAWYER COHEN’S SECRET LIAISON WITH THE KREMLIN

20 October 2016

COMPANY INTELLIGENCE REPORT 2016/166

US/RUSSIA: FURTHER DETAILS OF SECRET DIALOGUE BETWEEN TRUMP CAMPAIGN TEAM, KREMLIN AND ASSOCIATED HACKERS IN PRAGUE

13 December 2016

_________________________________________________________________

CONFIDENTIAL/SENSITIVE SOURCE

COMPANY INTELLIGENCE REPORT 2016/080

US PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION: REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE DONALD TRUMP’S ACTIVITIES IN RUSSIA AND COMPROMISING RELATIONSHIP WITH THE KREMLIN

Summary

– Russian regime has been cultivating, supporting and assisting TRUMP for at least 5 years. Aim, endorsed by PUTIN, has been to encourage splits and divisions in western alliance- So far TRUMP has declined various sweetener real estate business deals offered him in Russia in order to further the Kremlin’s cultivation of him. However he and his inner circle have accepted a regular flow of intelligence from the Kremlin, including on his Democratic and other political rivals

– Former top Russian intelligence officer claims FSB has compromised TRUMP through his activities in Moscow sufficiently to be able to blackmail him. According to several knowledgeable sources, his conduct in Moscow has included perverted sexual acts which have been arranged/monitored by the FSB

– A dossier of compromising material on Hillary CLINTON has been collated by the Russian Intelligence Services over many years and mainly comprises bugged conversations she had on various visits to Russia and intercepted phone calls rather than any embarrassing conduct. The dossier is controlled by Kremlin spokesman, PESKOV, directly on PUTIN’s orders. However it has not as yet been distributed abroad, including to TRUMP. Russian intentions for its deployment still unclear

Detail

1. Speaking to a trusted compatriot in June 2016 sources A and B, a senior Russian Foreign Ministry figure and a former top level Russian intelligence officer still active inside the Kremlin respectively, the Russian authorities had been cultivating and supporting US Republican presidential candidate, Donald TRUMP for at least 5 years. Source B asserted that the TRUMP operation was both supported and directed by Russian President Vladimir PUTIN. Its aim was to sow discord and disunity both within the US itself, but more especially within the Transatlantic alliance which was viewed as inimical to Russia’s interests. Source C, a senior Russian financial said the TRUMP operation should be seen in terms of PUTIN’s desire to return to Nineteenth Century ‘Great Power’ politics anchored upon countries’ interests rather than the ideals-based international order established after World War Two. S/he had overheard PUTIN talking in this way to close associates on severa1 occasions.

2. In terms of specifics, source A confided that he Kremlin had been feeding TRUMP and his team valuable Intelligence on his opponents, including Democratic presidential candidate Hillary CLINTON, for several years (see more below). This was confirmed by Source D, a close associate of TRUMP who had organized and managed his recent trips to Moscow, and who reported, also in June 2016, that this Russian intelligence had been “very helpful”. The Kremlin’ cultivation operation on TRUMP also had comprised of offering him various lucrative real estate development business deals in Russia, specially in relation to the ongoing 2018 World Cup soccer tournament. However, so far, for reasons unknown, TRUMP had not taken up any of these.

3. However, there were other aspects to TRUMP’s engagement with he Russian authorities. One which had borne fruit for them was to exploit TRUMP’s personal obsessions and sexual perversion in order to obtain suitable ‘kompromat’ (compromising material) on him. According to Source D, where s/he had been present, TRUMP’s (perverted) conduct in Moscow included hiring the presidential suite of the Ritz Carlton Hotel, where he knew President and Mrs OBAMA (whom he hated) had stayed on one of their official trips to Russia, and defiling the bed where they had slept by employing a number of prostitutes to perform a ‘golden showers’ [urination] show in front of him. The hotel was known to be under FSB control with microphones and concealed cameras in all the main rooms to record anything they wanted to.

4. The Moscow Ritz Carlton confirmed by Source E, [redaction of half sentence, 43 characters] who said that s/he and several of the staff were aware of it at the time and subsequently. S/he believed it had happened in 2013. Source E provided an introduction for a company ethnic Russian operative to Source F, a female staffer at the hotel when TRUMP had stayed there, who also confirmed the story. Speaking separately in June 2016, Source B, (the former top level Russian intelligence officer) asserted that TRUMP’s unorthodox behavior in Russia over the years had provided the authorities there with enough embarrassing material on the now Republican presidential candidate to be able to blackmail him if they so wished.

5. Asked about the Kremlin’s reported intelligence feed on TRUMP over recent years and rumours about a Russian dossier of ‘kompromat’ on Hillary CLINTON (being circulated), Source B confirmed the file’s existence. S/he confided in a trusted compatriot that it had been collated by Department K of the FSB for many years, dating back to her husband Bill’s presidency, and comprised mainly eavesdropped conversations of various sorts rather than details/evidence of unorthodox or embarrassing behavior. Some of the conversations were from bugged comments CLINTON had made on her various trips to Russia and focused on things she had said which contradicted her current position on various issues. Others were most probably from phone intercepts.

6. Continuing on this theme, Source G, a senior Kremlin official, confided that the CLINTON dossier was controlled exclusively by chief Kremlin spokesman. Dmitriy PESKOV, who was responsible for compiling/handling it on the explicit instructions of PUTIN himself. The dossier however had not as yet been made available abroad, including to TRUMP or his campaign team. At present it was unclear what PUTIN’s intentions were in this regard.

20 June 2016

COMPANY INTELLIGENCE REPORT 2016/086

RUSSIA/CYBER CRIME: A SYNOPSIS OF RUSSIAN STATE SPONSORED AND OTHER CYBER OFFENSIVE (CRIMINAL) OPERATIONS

Summary

– Russia has extensive programme of state-sponsored offensive cyber operations. External targets include foreign governments and big corporations, especially banks. FSB leads on cyber within Russian apparatus. Limited success in attacking top foreign targets like G7 governments, security services and IFIs but much more on second tier ones through IT back doors, using corporate and other visitors to Russia- FSB often uses coercion and blackmail to recruit most capable cyber operatives in Russia into its state-sponsored programmes. Heavy use also, both wittingly and unwittingly, of CIS emigres working in western corporations and ethnic Russians employed by neighbouring governments e.g. Latvia.

– Example cited of successful Russian cyber operation targeting senior Western business visitor. Provided back door into important Western institutions.

– Example given of US citizen of Russian origin approached by FSB and offered incentive of “Investment” in his business when visiting Moseow.

– Problems however for Russian authorities themselves in countering local hackers and cyber criminals, operating outside state control. Central Bank claims there were over 20 serious attacks on correspondent accounts held by CBR in 2015, comprising Roubles several billion in fraud

Some details given of leading non-state Russian cyber criminal groups

Details

1. Speaking in June 2016, a number of Russian figures with a detailed knowledge of national cyber crime, both state-sponsored and otherwise, outlined the current situation in this area. A former senior intelligence officer divided Russian state-sponsored offensive cyber operations into four categories (in order of priority):- targeting foreign, especially western governments; penetrating leading foreign business corporations, especially banks: domestic monitoring of the elite; and attacking political opponents both at home and abroad. The former intelligence officer reported that the Federal Security Service (FSB) was the lead organization within the Russian state apparatus for cyber operations.

2. In terms of the success of Russian offensive cyber operations to date, a senior government figure reported that there had been only limited success in penetrating the “first tier” foreign targets. These comprised western (especial1y G7 and NATO) governments, security and intelligence services and central banks, and the IFIs. To compensate for this shortfall, massive effort had been invested, with much greater success. in attacking the “secondary targets”, particularly western private banks and the governments of smaller states allied to the West. S/he mentioned Latvia in this regard. Hundreds of agents, either consciously cooperating with the FSB or whose personal and professional IT systems had been unwittingly compromised, were recruited. Many were people who had ethnic and family ties to Russia and/or had been incentivized financially to cooperate. Such people often would receive monetary inducements or contractual favours from the Russian state or its agents in return. This had created difficulties for parts of the Russian state apparatus in obliging/indulging them e.g. the Central Bank of Russia knowingly having to cover up for such agents’ money laundering operations through the Russian financial system.

3. In terms of the FSB’s recruitment of capable cyber operatives to carry out its, ideally deniable, offensive cyber operations, a Russian IT specialist with direct knowledge reported in June 2016 that this was often done using coercion and blackmail. In terms of ‘foreign’ agents, the FSB was approaching US citizens of Russian (Jewish) origin on business trips to Russia. In one case a US citizen of Russian ethnicity had been visiting Moscow to attract investors in his new information technology program. The FSB clearly knew this and had offered to provide seed capital to this person in return for them being able to access and modify his IP, with a view to targeting priority foreign targets by planting a Trojan virus in the software. The US visitor was told this was common practice. The FSB also had implied significant operational success as a result of installing cheap Russian IT games containing their own malware unwittingly by targets on their PCs and other platforms.

4. In a more advanced and successful FSB operation, an IT operator inside a leading Russian SOE, who previously had been employed on conventional (defensive) IT work there, had been under instruction for the last year to conduct an offensive cyber operation against a foreign director of the company. Although the latter was apparently an infrequent visitor to Russia, the FSB now successfully had penetrated his personal IT and through this had managed to access various important institutions in the West through the back door.

5. In terms of other technical IT platforms, an FSB cyber operative flagged up the ‘Telegram’ enciphered commercial system as having been of especial concern and therefore heavily targeted by the FSB, not least because it was used frequently by Russian internal political activists and oppositionists. His/her understanding was that the FSB now successfully had cracked this communications software and therefore it was no longer secure to use.

6. The senior Russian government figure cited above also reported that non-state sponsored cyber crime was becoming an increasing problem inside Russia for the government and authorities there. The Central Bank of Russia claimed that in 2015 alone there had been more than 20 attempts at serious cyber embezzlement of money from corresponding accounts held there, comprising several billions Roubles. More generally, s/he understood there were circa 15 major organised crime groups in the country involved in cyber crime, all of which continued to operate largely outside state and FSB control. These included the so-called ‘Anunak’, ‘Buktrap’ and ‘Mete!’ organisations.

26 July 2015

COMPANY INTELLIGENCE REPORT 2016/094

RUSSIA: SECRET KREMLIN MEETINGS ATTENDED BY TRUMP ADVISOR, CARTER PAGE IN MOSCOW (JULY 2016)

Summary

– TRUMP advisor Carter PAGE holds secret meetings in Moscow with SECHIN and senior Kremlin Internal Affairs official, DIVYEKIN- SECHIN raises issues of future bilateral US-Russia energy co-operation and associated lifting of western sanctions against Russia over Ukraine. PAGE non-committal in response

– DIVEYKIN discusses release of Russian dossier of ‘kompromat’ on TRUMP’s opponent, Hillary CUNTON, but also hints at Kremlin possession of such material on TRUMP

Detail

1. Speaking in July 2016, a Russian source close to Rosneft President, PUTIN close associate and US-sanctioned individual, Igor SECHIN, confided the details of a recent secret meeting between hirn and visiting Foreign Affairs Advisor to Republican presidential candidate Donald TRUMP, Carter PAGE.

2. According to SECHIN’s associate, the Rosneft President (CEO) had raised with PAGE the issues of future bilateral energy cooperation and prospects for an associated move to lift Ukraine-related western sanctions against Russia. PAGE had reacted positively to this demarche by SECHIN but had been generally non-committal in response.

3. Speaking separately, also in July 2016, an official close to Presidential Administration Head, S. IVANOV, confided in a compatriot that a senior colleague in the Internal Political Department of the PA, DIVYEKIN (nfd) also had met secretly with PAGE on his recent visit. Their agenda had included DIVEYKIN raising a dossier of ‘kompromat’ the Kremlin possessed on TRUMP’s Democratic presidential rival, Hillary CLINTON, and its possible release to the Republican’s campaign team.

4. However, the Kremlin official dose to S. IVANOV added that s/he believed DIVEYKIN also had hinted (or indicated more strongly) that the Russian leadership also had ‘kornpromat’ on TRUMP which the latter should bear in mind in his dealings with them.

19 July 2016

COMPANY INTELLIGENCE REPORT 2016/095

RUSSIA/US PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION: FURTHER INDICATIONS OF EXTENSIVE CONSPIRACY BETWEEN TRUMP’S CAMPAIGN TEAM AND THE KREMLIN

Summary

– Further evidence of extensive conspiracy between TRUMP’s campaign team and Kremlin, sanctioned at highest levels and involving Russian diplomatic staff based in the US- TRUMP associate admits Kremlin behind recent appearance of DNC emails on WikiLeaks, as means of maintaining plausible deniability

– Agreed exchange of information established in both directions. TRUMP’s team using moles within DNC and hackers in the US as well as outside in Russia. PUTIN motivated by fear and hatred of Hillary CLINTON. Russians receiving intel from TRUMP’s team on Russian oligarchs and their families in US

– Mechanism for transmitting this intelligence involves “pension” disbursements to Russian emigres living in US as cover, using consular officials in New York, DC and Miami

– Suggestion from source close to TRUMP and MANAFORT that Republican campaign team happy to have Russia as media bogeyman to mask more extensive corrupt business ties to China and other emerging countries

Detail

1. Speaking in confidence to a compatriot in late July 2016, Source E, an ethnic Russian close associate of Republican US presidential candidate Donald TRUMP, admitted that there was a well-developed conspiracy of co-operation between them and the Russian leadership. This was managed on the TRUMP side by the Republican candidate’s campaign manager, Paul MANAFORT, who was using foreign policy advisor, Carter PAGE, and others as intermediaries. The two sides had a mutual interest in defeating Democratic presidential candidate Hillary CLINTON, whom President PUTIN apparently both hated and feared.

2. Inter alia, Source E, acknowledged that the Russian regime had been behind the recent leak of embarrassing e-mail messages, emanating from the Democratic National Committee (DNC), to the WikiLeaks platform. The reason for using WikiLeaks was “plausible deniability” and the operation had been conducted with the full knowledge and support of TRUMP and senior members of his campaign team. In return the TRUMP team had agreed to sideline Russian intervention in Ukraine as a campaign issue and to raise US/NATO defence commitments in the Baltics and Eastern Europe to deflect attention away from Ukraine, a priority for PUTIN who needed to cauterise the subject.

3. In the wider context of TRUMP campaign/Kremlin co-operation, Source E claimed that the intelligence network being used against CLINTON comprised three elements. Firstly there were agents/facilitators within the Democratic Party structure itself; secondly Russian emigre and associated offensive cyber operators based in the US; and thirdly, statesponsored cyber operatives working in Russia. All three elements had played an important role to date. On the mechanism for rewarding relevant assets based in the US, and effecting a two-way flow of intelligence and other useful Information, Source E claimed that Russian diplomatic staff in key cities such as New York, Washington DC and Miami were using the emigre ‘pension’ distribution system as cover. The operation therefore depended on key people in the US Russian emigre community for its success. Tens of thousands of dollars were involved.

4. In terms of the intelligence flow from the TRUMP team to Russia, Source E reported that much of this concerned the activities of business oligarchs and their families’ activities and assets in the US, with which PUTIN and the Kremlin seemed preoccupied.

5. Commenting on the negative media publicity surrounding alleged Russian interference in the US election campaign in support of TRUMP, Source E said he understood that the Republican candidate and his team were relatively relaxed about this because it deflected media and the Democrats’ attention away from TRUMP’s business dealings in China and other emerging markets. Unlike in Russia, these were substantial and involved the payment of large bribes and kickbacks which, were they to become public, would be potentially very damaging to their campaign.

6. Finally, regarding TRUMP’s claimed minimal investment profile in Russia, a separate source with direct knowledge said this had not been for want of trying. TRUMP’s previous efforts had included exploring the real estate sector in St Petersburg as well as Moscow but in the end TRUMP had had to settle for the use of extensive sexual services there from local prostitutes rather than business success.

COMPANY INTELLIGENCE REPORT 2016/097

RUSSIA-US PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION: KREMLIN CONCERN THAT POLITICAL FALLOUT FROM DNC E-MAIL HACKING AFFAIR SPIRALLING OUT OF CONTROL

Summary

– Kremlin concerned that political fallout from DNC e-mail hacking operation is spiralling out of contro!. Extreme nervousness among TRUMP’s associates as result of negative media attention/accusations- Russians meanwhile keen to cool situation and maintain ‘plausible deniability’ of existing /ongoing pro-TRUMP and anti-CLINTON operations. Therefore unlikely to be any ratcheting up offensive plays in immediate future

– Source close to TRUMP campaign however confirms regular exchange with Kremlin has existed for at least 8 years, including intelligence fed back to Russia on oligarchs’ activities in US

– Russians apparently have promised not to use ‘kompromat’ they hold on TRUMP as leverage, given high levels of voluntary co-operation forthcoming from his team

Detail

1. Speaking in confidence to a trusted associate in late July 2016, a Russian emigre figure dose to the Republican US presidential candidate Donald TRUMP’s campaign team commented on the fallout from publicity surrounding the Democratic National Committee (DNC) e-mail hacking scandal. The emigre said there was a high level of anxiety within the TRUMP team as a result of various accusations levelled against them and indications from the Kremlin that President PUTIN and others in the leadership thought things had gone too far now and risked spiralling out of control.

2. Continuing on this theme, the emigre associate of TRUMP opined that the Kremlin wanted the situation to calm but for ‘plausible deniability’ to be maintained concerning its (extensive) pro-TRUMP and anti-CLINTON operations. S/he therefore judged that it was unlikely these would be ratcheted up, at least for the time being.

3. However, in terms of established operational liaison between the TRUMP team and the Kremlin, the emigre confirmed that an intelligence exchange had been running between them for at least 8 years. Within this context PUTIN’s priority requirement had been for intelligence on the activities, business and otherwise, in the US of leading Russian oligarchs and their families. TRUMP and his associates duly had obtained and supplied the Kremlin with this information.

4. Finally, the emigre said s/he understood the Kremlin had more intelligence on CLINTON and her campaign but he did not know the details or when or if it would be released. As far as ‘kompromat’ (compromising information) on TRUMP were concerned, although there was plenty of this, he understood the Kremlin had given its word that it would not be deployed against the Republican presidential candidate given how helpful and co-operative his team had been over several years, and particularly of late.

30 July 2016

COMPANY INTELLIGENCE REPORT 2016/100

RUSSIA/USA: GROWING BACKLASH IN KREMLIN TO DNC HACKING AND TRUMP SUPPORT OPERATIONS

Summary

– Head of PA IVANOV laments Russian intervention in US presidential election and black PR against CLINTON and the DNC. Vows not to supply intelligence to Kremlin PR operatives again. Advocates now sitting tight and denying everything- Presidential spokesman PESKOV the main protagonist in Kremlin campaign to aid TRUMP and damage CLINTON. He is now scared and fears being made scapegoat by leadership for backlash in US. Problem compounded by his botched intervention in recent Turkish crisis

– Premier MEDVEDEV’s office furious over DNC hacking and associated anti-Russian publicity. Want good relations with US and ability to travel there. Refusing to support or help cover up after PESKOV

– Talk now in Kremlin of TRUMP withdrawing from presidential race altogether, but this still largely wishful thinking by more liberal elements in Moscow

Detail

1. Speaking in early August 2016, two well-placed and established Kremlin sources outlined the divisions and backlash in Moscow arising from the leaking of Democratic National Committee (DNC) e-mails and the wider pro-TRUMP operation being conducted in the US. Head of Presidential Administration, Sergei IVANOV, was angry at the recent turn of events. He believed the Kremlin “team” involved, led by presidential spokesman Dmitriy PESKOV, had gone too far in interfering in foreign affairs with their “elephant in a china shop black PR”. IVANOV claimed always to have opposed the handling and exploitation of intelligence by this PR “team”. Following the backlash against such foreign interference in US politics, IVANOV was advocating that the only sensible course of action now for the Russian leadership was to “sit tight and deny everything”.

2. Continuing on this theme the source close to IVANOV reported that PESKOV now was “scared shitless” that he would be scapegoated by PUTIN and the Kremlin and held responsible for the backlash against Russian political interference in the US election. IVANOV was determined to stop PESKOV playing an independent role in relation to the US going forward and the source fully expected the presidential spokesman now to lay low. PESKOV’s position was not helped by a botched attempt by him also to interfere in the recent failed coup in Turkey from a governrnent relations (GR) perspective (no further details).

3. The extent of disquiet and division within Moscow caused by the backlash against Russian interference in the US election was underlined by a second source, close to premier Dmitriy MEDVEDEV (DAM). S/he said the Russian prime minister and his colleagues wanted to have good relations with the US, regardless of who was in power there, and not least so as to be able to travel there in future, either officially or privately. They were openly refusing to cover up for PESKOV and others involved in the DNC/TRUMP operations or to support his counter-attack of allegations against the USG for its alleged hacking of the Russian government and state agencies.

4. According to the first source, close to IVANOV, there had been talk in the Kremlin of TRUMP being forced to withdraw from the presidential race altogether as a result of recent events, ostensibly on grounds of his psychological state and unsuitability for high office. This might not be so bad for Russia in the circumstances but in the view of the source, it remained largely wishful thinking on the part of those in the regime opposed to PESKOV and his “botched” operations, at least for the time being.

5 August 2016

COMPANY INTELLIGENCE REPORT 2016/101

RUSSIA/US PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION: SENIOR KREMLIN FIGURE OUTLlNES EVOLVING RUSSIAN TACTICS IN PRO-TRUMP, ANTI-CLINTON OPERATION

Summary

– Head of PA, IVANOV assesses Kremlin intervention in US presidential election and outlines leadership thinking on operational way forward- No new leaks envisaged, as too politically risky, but rather further exploitation of (WikiLeaks) material already disseminated to exacerbate divisions

– Educated US youth to be targeted as protest (againstCLINTON) and swing vote in attempt to turn them over to TRUMP

– Russian leadership, including PUTIN, celebrating perceived success to date in splitting US hawks and elite

– Kremlin engaging with several high profile US players, including STEIN, PAGE and (former DIA Director Michael Flynn), and funding their recent visits to Moscow

Details

1. Speaking in confidence to a close colleague in early August 2016, Head of the Russian Presidential Administration (PA), Sergei IVANOV, assessed the impact and results of Kremlin intervention in the US presidential election to date. Although most commentators believed that the Kremlin was behind the leaked DNC/CLINTON e-mails, this remained technically deniable. Therefore the Russians would not risk their position for the time being with new leaked material, even to a third party like WikiLeaks. Rather the tactics would be to spread rumours and misinformation about the content of what already had been leaked and make up new content.

2. Continuing on this theme, IVANOV said that the audience to be targeted by such operations was the educated youth in America as the PA assessed that there was still a chance they could be persuaded to vote for Republican candidate Donald TRUMP as a protest against the Washington establishment (in the form of Democratic candidate Hillary CLINTON). The hope was that even if she won, as a result of this CLINTON in power would be bogged down in working for internal reconciliation in the US, rather than being able to focus on foreign policy which would damage Russia’s interests. This also should give President PUTIN more room for manoeuvre in the run-up to Russia’s own presidential election in 2018.

3. IVANOV reported that although the Kremlin had underestimated the strength of US media and liberal reaction to the DNC hack and TRUMP’s links to Russia, PUTIN was generally satisfied with the progress of the anti-CLINTON operation to date. He recently had had a drink with PUTIN to mark this. In IVANOV’s view, the US had tried to divide the Russian elite with sanctions but failed, whilst they, by contrast, had succeeded in splitting the US hawks inimical to Russia and the Washington elite more generally, half of whom had refused to endorse any presidential candidate as a result of Russian intervention.

4. Speaking separately, also in early August 2016, a Kremlin official involved in US relations commented on aspects of the Russian operation to date. Its goal had been threefold: asking sympathetic US actors how Moscow could help them; gathering relevant intelligence; and creating and disseminating compromising information (‘kompromat’). This had involved the Kremlin supporting various US political figures, including funding indirectly their recent visits to Moscow. S/he named a delegation from Lyndon LAROUCHE; presidential candidate Jill STEIN of the Green Party; TRUMP foreign policy adviser Carter PAGE; and former DIA Director Michael Flynn, in this regard and as successful in terms of perceived outcomes.

10 August 2016

COMPANY INTELLIGENCE REPORT 2016/102

RUSSIA/US PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION: REACTION IN TRUMP CAMP TO RECENT NEGATIVE PUBLICITY ABOUT RUSSIAN INTERFERENCE AND LIKELY RESULTING TACTICS GOING FORWARD

Summary

– TRUMP campaign insider reports recent DNC e-mail leaks were aimed at switching SANDER5 (protest) voters away from CLINTON and over to TRUMP- Admits Republican campaign underestimated resulting negative reaction from U5 liberals, elite and media a nd forced to cha nge course as result

– Need now to turn tables on CLINTON’s use of PUTIN as bogeyman in election, although some resentment at Russian president’s perceived attempt to undermine USG and system over and above swinging presidential election

Detail

1. Speaking in confidence on 9 August 2016, an ethnic Russian associate of Republican US presidential candidate Donald TRUMP discussed the reaction inside his camp, and revised tactics therein resulting from recent negative publicity concerning Moscow’s clandestine involvement in the campaign. TRUMP’s associate reported that the aim of leaking the DNC e-mails to WikiLeaks during the Democratic Convention had been to swing supporters of Bernie SANDERS away from Hillary CUNTON and across to TRUMP. These voters were perceived as activist and anti-status quo and anti-establishment and in that regard sharing many features with the TRUMP campaign, including a visceral dislike of Hillary CLINTON. This objective had been conceived and promoted, inter alia, by TRUMP’s foreign policy adviser Carter PAGE who had discussed it directly with the ethnic Russian associate.

2. Continuing on this theme, the ethnic Russian associate of TRUMP assessed that the problem was that the TRUMP campaign had underestimated the strength of the negative reaction from liberals and especially the conservative elite to Russian interference. This was forcing a rethink and a likely change of tactics. The main objective in the short term was to check Democratic candidate Hillary CLINTON’s successful exploitation of the PUTIN as bogeyman/Russian interference story to tarnish TRUMP and bolster her own (patriotic) credentials. The TRUMP campaign was focusing on tapping into support in the American television media to achieve this, as they reckoned this resource had been underused by them to date.

3. However, TRUMP’s associate also admitted that there was a fair amount of anger and resentment within the Republican candidate’s team at what was perceived by PUTIN as going beyond the objective of weakening CUNTON and bolsteringTRUMP, by attempting to exploit the situation to undermine the US government and democratic system more generally. It was unclear at present how this aspect of the situation would play out in the weeks to come.

10 August 2016

COMPANY INTELLIGENCE REPORT 2016/105

RUSSIA/UKRAINE: THE DEMISE OF TRUMP’s CAMPAIGN MANAGER PAUL MANAFORT

Summary

– Ex-Ukrainian President YANUKOVYCH confides directly to PUTIN that he authorised kick-back payments to MANAFORT, as alleged in western media. Assures Russian President however there is no documentary evidence/trail- PUTIN and Russian leadership remain worried however and sceptical that YANUKOVYCH has fully covered the traces of these payments to TRUMP’s former campaign manager

– Close associate of TRUMP explains reasoning behind MANAFORT’s recent resignation. Ukraine revelations played part but others wanted MANAFORT out for various reasons, especially LEWANDOWSKI who remains influential

Detail

1. Speaking in late August 2016, in the immediate aftermath of Paul MANAFORT’s resignation as campaign manager for US Republican presidential candidate Donald TRUMP, a well-placed Russian figure reported on a recent meeting between President PUTIN and ex-President YANUKOVYCH of Ukraine. This had been held in secret on 15 August near Volgograd, Russia and the western media revelations about MANAFORT and Ukraine had featured prominently on the agenda. YANUKOVYCH had confided in PUTIN that he did authorise and order substantial kick-back payments to MANAFORT as alleged but sought to reassure him that there was no documentary trail left behind which could provide clear evidence of this.

2. Given YANUKOVYCH’s (unimpressive) record in covering up his own corrupt tracks in the past, PUTIN and others in the Russian leadership were sceptical about the ex-Ukrainian president’s reassurances on this as relating to MANAFORT. They therefore still feared the scandal had legs, especially as MANAFORT had been commercially active in Ukraine right up to the time (in March 2016) when he joined TRUMP’s campaign team. For them it therefore remained a point of potential political vulnerability and embarrassment.

3. Speaking separately, also in late August 2016, an American political figure associated with Donald TRUMP and his campaign outlined the reasons behind MANAFORT’s recent demise. S/he said it was true that the Ukraine corruption revelations had played a part in this but also, several senior players close to TRUMP had wanted MANAFORT out, primarily to loosen his control on strategy and policy formulation. Of particular importance in this regard was MANAFORT’s predecessor as campaign manager, Corey LEWANDOWSKI, who hated MANAFORT personally and remained close to TRUMP with whom he discussed the presidential campaign on a regular basis.

22 August 2016

COMPANY INTELLIGENCE REPORT 2016/111

RUSSIA/US: KREMLIN FALLOUT FROM MEDIA EXPOSURE OF MOSCOW’S INTERFERENCE IN THE US PRESIDENTIAL CAMPAIGN

Summary

– Russians do have further ‘kompromat’ on CLINTON (e-mails) and considering disseminating it after Duma (legislative elections) in late September. Presidential spokesman PESKOV continues to lead on this- Kremlin orders senior staff to remain silent in media and private on allegations of Russian interference in US presidential campaign

– Senior figure however confirms gist of allegations and reports IVANOV sacked as Head of Administration on account of giving PUTIN poor advice on issue. VAINO selected as his replacement partly because he was not involved in pro-TRUMP, anti-CLINTON operation/s

– However, equally important is Kremlin objective to shift policy consensus favourably to Russia in US post-OBAMA whoever wins. Both presidential candidates’ opposition to TPP and TTIP viewed as a result in this respect

– Senior Russian diplomat withdrawn from Washington embassy on account ofpotential exposure in US presidential election operation/s

Detail

1. Speaking in confidence to a trusted compatriot in mid-September 2016, a senior member of the Russian Presidential Administration (PA) commented on the political fallout from recent western media revelations about Moscow’s intervention, in favour of Donald TRUMP and against Hillary CLINTON, in the US presidential election. The PA official reported that the issue had become incredibly sensitive and that President PUTIN had issued direct orders that Kremlin and government insiders should not discuss it in public or even in private.

2. Despite this, the PA official confirmed, from direct knowledge, that the gist of the allegations was true. PUTIN had been receiving conflicting advice on interfering from three separate and expert groups. On one side had been the Russian ambassador to the US, Sergei KISLYAK, and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, together with an independent and informal network run by presidential foreign policy advisor, Yuri USHAKOV (KISLYAK’s predecessor in Washington) who had urged caution and the potential negative impact on Russia from the operation/s. On the other side was former PA Head, Sergei IVANOV, backed by Russian Foreign Intelligence (SVR), who had advised PUTIN that the pro-TRUMP, antiCLINTON operation/s would be both effective and plausibly deniable with little blowback. The first group/s had been proven right and this had been the catalyst in PUTIN’s decision to sack IVANOV (unexpectedly) as PA Head in August. His successor, Anton VAINO, had been selected for the job partly because he had not been involved in the US presidential election operation/s.

3. Continuing on this theme, the senior PA official said the situation now was that the Kremlin had further ‘komprornat’ on candidate CLINTON and had been considering releasing this via “plausibly deniable” channels after the Duma (legislative) elections were out of the way in midSeptember. There was however a growing train of thought and associated lobby, arguing that the Russians could still make candidate CLINTON look “weak and stupid” by provoking her into railing against PUTIN and Russia without the need to release more of her e-mails. Presidential Spokesman, Dmitriy PESKOV remained a key figure in the operation, although any final decision on dissemination of further material would be taken by PUTIN himself.

4. The senior PA official also reported that a growing element in Moscow’s intervention in the US presidential election campaign was the objective of shifting the US political consensus in Russia’s perceived interests regardless of who won. It basically comprised of pushing candidate CUNTON away from President OBAMA’s policies. The best example of this was that both candidates now openly opposed the draft trade agreements, TPP and TTIP, which were assessed by Moscow as detrimental to Russian interests. Other issues where the Kremlin was looking to shift the US policy consensus were Ukraine and Syria. Overall however, the presidential election was considered still to be too close to call.

5. Finally, speaking separately to the same compatriot, a senior Russian MFA official reported that as a prophylactic measure, a leading Russian diplomat, Mikhail KULAGIN, had been withdrawn from Washington at short notice because Moscow feared his heavy involvement in the US presidential election operation, including the so-called veterans’ pensions ruse (reported previously), would be exposed in the media there. His replacement, Andrei BONDAREV however was clean in this regard.

Company Comment

The substance of what was reported by the senior Russian PA official in paras 1 and 2 above, including the reasons for Sergei IVANOV’s dismissal, was corroborated independently by a former top level Russian intelligence officer and Kremlin Insider, also in mid-September.

14 September 2016

COMPANY INTELLIGENCE REPORT 2016/112

RUSSIA/US PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION: KREMLIN-ALPHA GROUP CO OPERATION

Summary

– Key intermediary in PUTIN-Alpha relationship identified as Oleg GOVORUN, currently Head of a Presidential Administration department but throughout the 19905, the Alpha executive who delivered illicit cash directly to PUTIN- Top level Russian official confirms current closeness of Alpha Group PUTIN relationship. Significant favours continue to be done in both directions and FRIDMAN and AVEN still giving informal advice to PUTIN, especially on the US

– PUTIN personally unbothered about Alpha’s current lack of investment in Russia but under pressure from colleagues over this and able to exploit it as lever over Alpha interlocutors

Detail

1. Speaking to a trusted compatriot in mid-September 2016, a top level Russian government official commented on the history and current state of relations between President PUTIN and the Alpha Group of businesses led by oligarchs Mikhail FRIDMAN, Petr AVEN and German KHAN. The Russian government figure reported that although they had had their ups and downs, the leading figures in Alpha currently were on very good terms with PUTIN. Significant favours continued to be done in both directions, primarily political ones for PUTIN and business/legal ones for Alpha. Also, FRIDMAN and AVEN continued to give informal advice to PUTIN on foreign policy, and especially about the US where he distrusted advice being given to him by officials.

2. Although FRIDMAN recently had met directly with PUTIN in Russia, much of the dialogue and business between them was mediated through a senior Presidential Administration official, Oleg GOVORUN, who currently headed the department therein responsible for Social Co-operation With the CIS. GOVORUN was trusted by PUTIN and recently had accompanied him to Uzbekistan to pay respects at the tomb of former president KARIMOV. However according to the top level Russian government official, during the 1990s GOVORUN had been Head of Government Relations at Alpha Group and in reality, the “driver” and “bag carrier” used by FRIDMAN and AVEN to deliver large amounts of illicit cash to the Russian president, at that time deputy Mayor of St Petersburg. Given that and the continuing sensitivity of the PUTIN-Alpha relationship, and need for plausible deniability, much of the contact between them was now indirect and entrusted to the relatively low profile GOVORUN.

3. The top level Russian government official described the PUTIN-Alpha relationship as both carrot and stick. Alpha held ‘kompromat’ on PUTIN and his corrupt business activities from the 1990s whilst although not personally overly bothered by Alpha’s failure to reinvest the proceeds of its TNK oil company sale into the Russian economy since, the Russian president was able to use pressure on this count from senior Kremlin colleagues as a lever on FRIDMAN and AVEN to make them do his political bidding.

14 September 2016

COMPANY INTELLIGENCE REPORT 2016/113

RUSSIA/US PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION: REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE TRUMP’S PRIOR ACTIVITIES IN ST PETERSBURG

Summary

– Two knowledgeable St Petersburg sources claim Republican candidate TRUMP has paid bribes and engaged in sexual activities there but key witnesses silenced and evidence hard to obtain- Both believe Azeri business associate of TRUMP, Araz AGALAROV will know the details

Detail

1. Speaking to a trusted compatriot in September 2016, two well-placed sources based in St Petersburg, one in the political/business elite and the other involved in the loeal services and tourist industry, commented on Republican US presidential candidate Donald TRUMP’s prior activities in the city.

2. Both knew TRUMP had visited St Petersburg on several occasions in the past and had been interested in doing business deals there involving real estate. The local business/political elite figure reported that TRUMP had paid bribes there to further his interests but very discreetly and only through affiliated companies, making it very hard to prove. The local services industry source reported that TRUMP had participated in sex parties in the city too, but that all direct witnesses to this recently had been “silenced” i.e. bribed or coerced to disappear.

3. The two St Petersburg figures cited believed an Azeri business figure, Araz AGALAROV (with offices in Baku and London) had been closely involved with TRUMP in Russia and would know most of the details of what the Republican presidential candidate had got up to there.

14 September 2016

COMPANY INTELLIGENCE REPORT 2016/130

RUSSIA: KREMLIN ASSESSMENT OF TRUMP AND RUSSIAN INTERFERENCE IN US PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION

Summary

– Buyer’s remorse sets in with Kremlin over TRUMP support operation in US presidential election. Russian leadership disappointed that leaked e-mails on CLINTON have not had greater impact in campaign- Russians have injected further anti-CLINTON material into the ‘plausibly deniable’ leaks pipeline which will continue to surface, but best material already in public domain

– PUTIN angry with senior officials who “overpromised” on TRUMP and further heads likely to roll as result. Foreign Minister LAVIROV may be next

– TRUMP supported by Kremlin because seen as divisive anti-establishment candidate who would shake up current international status quo in Russia’s favor. Lead on TRUMP operation moved from Foreign Ministry to FSB and then to presidential administration where it now sits

Detail

1. Speaking separately in confidence to a trusted compatriot in early October 2016, a senior Russian leadership figure and a Foreign Ministry official reported on recent developments concerning the Kremlin’s operation to support Republican candidate Donald TRUMP in the US presidential election. The senior leadership figure said that a degree of buyer’s remorse was setting in among Russian leaders concerning TRUMP. PUTIN and his colleagues were surprised and disappointed that leaks of Democratic candidate, Hillary CLINTON’s hacked e-mails had not had greater impact on the campaign.

2. Continuing on this theme, the senior leadership figure commented that a stream of further hack CLINTON material already had been injected by the Kremlin into compliant western media outlets like WikiLeaks, which remained at leas “plausibly deniable”, so the stream of these would continue through October and up to the election. However s/he understood that the best material the Russians had already was out and there were no real game-changers to come.

3. The Russian Foreign Ministry official, who had direct access ot he TRUMP support operation, reported that PUTIN was angry at his subordinates “over-promising” on the Republican presidential candidate, both interms of his chances and reliability and being able to cover and/or contain the US backlash over Kremlin interference. More heads therefore were likely to roll, with the MFA the easiest target. Ironically, despite his consistent urging of caution on the issue, Foreign Minister LAVROV could be the next one to go.

4. Asked to explain why PUTIN and the Kremlin had launched such an aggressive TRUMP support operation in the first place, the MFA official said that Russian needed to upset the liberal international status quo, including on Ukraine-related sanctions, which was seriously disadvantaging the country. TRUMP was viewed as divisive in disrupting the whole US political sstem; anti-Establishment; and a pragmatist with whom they could do business. As the TRUMP support operation had gained momentum, control of it had passed from the MFA to the FSB and then into the presidential administration where it remained, a reflection of its growing significance over time. There was still a view in the Kremlin that TRUMP would continue as (divisive) political force even if he lost the presidency and may run for and be elected to another public office.

12 October 2016

COMPANY INTELLIGENCE REPORT 2016/134

RUSSIA/PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION: FURTHER DETAILS OF KREMLIN LIAISON WITH TRUMP CAMPAIGN

Summary

– Close associate of SECHIN confirms his secret meeting in Moscow with Carter PAGE in July- Substance included offer of large stake in Rosneft in return for lifting sanctions on Russia. PAGE confirms this is TRUMP’s intention

– SECHIN continued to think TRUMP would win presidency up to 17 October. Now looking to reorientate his engagement with the US

– Kremlin insider highlights importance of TRUMP’s lawyer, Michael COHEN’s covert relationship with Russia. COHEN’s wife is of Russian descent and her father a leading property developer in Moscow

Detail

1. Speaking to a trusted compatriot in mid October, a close associate of Rosneft President and PUTIN all Igor’ SECHIN elaborated on the reported secret meeting between the later and Carter PAGE, of US Republican presidential candidate’s foreign policy team, in Moscow in July 2016. The secret meeting had been confirmed to him/her by a senior member of SECHIN’s staff, in addition to by the Rosneft President himself. It took place on either 7 or 8 July, the same day or the one after Carter PAGE made a public speech to the Higher Economic School in Moscow.

2, In terms of the substance of their discussion, SECHIN’s associate said that the Rosneft President was so keen to lift personal and corporate western sanctions imposed on the company that he offered PAGE/TRUMP’s associate the brokerage of up to a 19 per cent (privatised) stake in Rosneft in return. PAGE had expressed interet and confirmed that were TRUMP elected US president, then sanctions on Russia would be lifted.

3. According to SECHIN’s close associate, the Rosneft President had continued to believe that TRUMP could win the US presidency right up to 17 October, when he assessed this was no longer possible. SECHIN was keen to re-adapt accordingly and put feelers out to other business and political contacts in the US instead.

4. Speaking separately to the same compatriot in mid-October 2016, a Kremlin insider with direct access to the leadership confirmed that a key role in the secret TRUMP campaign/Kremlin relationship was being played by the Re[publican candidate’s personal lawyer Michael COHEN. [redacted: two sentences]

Source Comment

5. SECHIN’s associate opined that although PAGE had not stated it explicitly to SECHIN, he had clearly implied that in terms of his comment on TRUMP’s intention to lifet Russian sanctions if elected president, he was speaking with the Republican candidate’s authority.

Company Comment

6. [Redacted: 4 full sentences]

COMPANY INTELLIGENCE REPORT 2016/135

RUSSIA/US PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION: THE IMPORTANT ROLE OF TRUMP LAWYER, COHEN IN CAMPAIGN’S SECRET LIAISON WITH THE KREMLIN

Summary

– Kremlin insider outlines important role played by TRUMP’s lawyer COHEN in secret liaison with Russian leadership- COHEN engaged with Russians in trying to cover up scandal of MANAFORT and exposure of PAGE and meets Kremlin officials secretly in the EU in August in pursuit of this goal.

– These secret contacts continue but are now farmed out to trusted agents in Kremlin-linked institutes so as to remain “plausibly deniable” for Russian regime

– Further confirmation that sacking of IVANOV and appointments of VAINO and KIRIYENKO linked to need to cover up Kremlin’s TRUMP support operation

Detail

1. Speaking in confidence to a longstanding compatriot friend in mid October 2016, a Kremlin insider highlighted the importance of Republican presidential candidate Donald TRUMP’s lawyer, Michael COHEN. In the ongoing secret liaison relationship between the New York tycoon’s campaign and the Russian leadership, COHEN’s role had grown following the departure of Paul MANNAFORT as TRUMP’s campaign manager in August 2016. Prior to that MANNAFORT had led for the TRUMP side.

2. According to the Kremlin insider, COHEN now was heavily engaged in a cover up and damage limitation operation in the attempt to prevent the full details of TRUMP’s relationship with Russia being exposed. In pursuit of this aim, COHEN had met secretly with several Russian Presidential Administration (PA) Legal Department officials in an EU country in August 2016. The immediate issues had been to contain further scandals involving MANNAFORT’s commercial and political role in Russia/Ukraine and to limit the damage arising from exposure of former TRUMP foreign policy advisor, Carter PAGE’s secret meetings with Russian leadership figures in Moscow the previous month. The overall objective had been to “to sweep it all under the carpet and make sure no connections could be fully established or proven”.

3. Things had become even “hotter” since August on the TRUMP-Russia track. According to the Kremlin insider, this had meant that direct contact between the TRUMP team and Russia had been farmed out by the Kremlin to trusted agents of influence working in pro-government policy institutes like that of Law and Comparative Jurisprudence. COHEN however continued to lead for the TRUMP team.

4. Referring back to the (surprise) sacking of Sergei IVAN OV as Head of PA in August 2016, his replacement by Anton VAINO and the appointment of former Russian premier Sergei KIRIYENKO to another senior position in the PA, the Kremlin insider repeated that this had been directly connected to the TRUMP support operation and the need to cover up now that it was being exposed by the USG and in the western media.

Company Comment

The Kremlin insider was unsure of the identities of the PA officials with whom COHEN met secretly in August, or the exact date/s and locations of the meeting/so There were significant internal security barriers being erected in the PA as the TRUMP issue became more controversial and damaging. However s/he continued to try to obtain these.

19 October 2016

COMPANY INTELLIGENCE REPORT 2016/136

RUSSIA/US PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION: FURTHER DETAILS OF TRUMP LAWYER COHEN’S SECRET LIAISON WITH THE KREMLIN

Summary

– Kremlin insider reports TRUMP lawyer COHEN’s secret meeting/s with Kremlin officials in August 2016 was/were held in Prague- Russian parastatal organisation Rossotrudnichestvo used as cover for this liaison and premises in Czech capital may have been used for the meeting/s

– Pro-PUTIN leading Duma figure, KOSACHEV, reportedly involved as “plausibly deniable” facilitator and may have participated in the August meeting/s with COHEN

Detail

1. Speaking to a compatriot and friend on 19 October 2016, a Kremlin insider provided further details of reported clandestine meeting/s between Republican presidential candidate, Donald TRUMP’s lawyer Michael COHEN and Kremlin representatives in August 2016. Although the communication between them had to be cryptic for security reasons, the Kremlin insider clearly indicated to his/her friend that the reported contact/s took place in Prague, Czech Republic.

2. Continuing on this theme, the Kremlin insider highlighted the importance of the Russian parastatal organisation, Rossotrudnichestvo, in this contact between TRUMP campaign representative/s and Kremlin officials. Rossotrudnichestvo was being used as cover for this relationship and its office in Prague may well have been used to host the COHEN/Russian Presidential Administration (PA) meeting/s. It was considered a “plausibly deniable” vehicle for this, whilst remaining entirely under Kremlin control.

3. The Kremlin insider went on to identify leading pro-PUTIN Duma figure, Konstantin KOSACHEV (Head of the Foreign Relations Committee) as an important figure in the TRUMP campaign-Kremlin liaison operation. KOSACHEV, also “plausibly deniable” being part of the Russian legislature rather than executive, had facilitated the contact in Prague and by implication, may have attended the meeting/s with COHEN there in August.

Company Comment

e reported previously, in our Company Intelligence Report 2016/135 of 19 October 2016 from the same source, that COHEN met officials from the PA Legal Department clandestinely in an EU country in August 2016. This was in order to clean up the mess left behind by western media revelations of TRUMP ex-campaign manager MANAFORT’s corrupt relationship with the former pro-Russian YANUKOVYCH regime in Ukraine and TRUMP foreign policy advisor, Carter PAGE’ s secret meetings in Moscow with senior regime figures in July 2016. According to the Kremlin advisor, these meeting/s were originally scheduled for COHEN in Moscow but shifted to what was considered an operationally “soft” EU country when it was judged too compromising for him to travel to the Russian capital.

20 October 2016

COMPANY INTELLIGENCE REPORT 2016/166

US/RUSSIA: FURTHER DETAILS OF SECRET DIALOGUE BETWEEN TRUMP CAMPAIGN TEAM, KREMLIN AND ASSOCIATED HACKERS IN PRAGUE

Summary

– TRUMP’s representative COHEN accompanied to Prague in August/September 2016 by 3 colleagues for secret discussions with Kremlin representatives and associated operators/hackers- Agenda included how to process deniable cash payments to operatives; contingency plans for covering up operations; and action in event of a CLINTON election victory

– Some further details of Russian representatives/operatives involved; Romanian hackers employed; and use of Bulgaria as bolt hole to “lie low”

– Anti-CLINTON hackers and other operatives paid by both TRUMP team and Kremlin, but with ultimate loyalty to Head of PA, IVANOV and his successor/s

Detail

1. We reported previously (2016/135 and /136) on secret meeting/s held in Prague, Czech Republic in August 2016 between then Republican presidential candidate Donald TRUMP’s representative, Michael COHEN and his interlocutors from the Kremlin working under cover of Russian ‘NGO’ Rossotrudnichestvo.

2. [Redacted: two full sentences] provided further details and anti-CLINTON/Democratic Party operations. COHEN had been accompanied to Prague by 3 colleagues and the timing of the visit was either in the last week of August or the first week of September. One of their main Russian interlocutors was Oleg SOLODUKHIN operating under Rossotrudnichestvo cover. According to [redacted: 20 characters] the agenda comprised questions on how deniable cash payments were to be made to hackers who had worked in Europe under Kremlin direction against the CLINTON campaign and various contingencies for covering up these operations and Moscow’s secret liaison with the TRUMP team more generally.

3. [Redacted: 39 characters] reported that over the period March-September 2016 a company/Webzilla and its affiliates had been using botnets and porn traffic to transmit viruses, plant bugs, steal data and conduct “altering operations” against the Democratic Party leadership. Entities linked to one Aleksei CUBAROV were involved and he and another hacking expert, both recruited under duress by the FSB, Seva KAPSUGOVICH, were significant players in this operation. In Prague. COHEN agreed contingency plans for various scenarios CO protect the operation. but in particular what was to be done in the event that Hillary CLINTON won the presidency. It was important in this event that all cash payments owed were rnade quickly and discreetly and that cyber and other operators were stood down/able to go effectively to ground to cover their traces. We reported earlier that the involvement of political operatives Paul MANAFORT and Carter PAGE in the secret TRUMPKremlin liaison had been exposed in the media in the run-up to Prague and that damage limitation of these also was discussed by COHEN with the Kremlin representatives).

4. In terms of practical measures to be taken, it was agreed by the two sides in Prague to stand down various “Romanian hackers” (presumably based in their homeland or neighbouring eastern Europe) and that other operatives should head for a bolt-hole in Plovdiv, Bulgaria where they should “lay low”. On payments, IVANOV·s associate said that the operatives involved had been paid by both TRUMP’s team and the Kremlin, though their orders and ultimate loyalty lay with IVANOV, as Head of the PA and thus ultimately responsible for the operation, and his designated successor/s after he was dismissed by president PUTIN in connection with the anti-CLINTON operation in mid August.

13 December 2016

[End]

← Back

Thank you for your response. ✨

Donald Trump Jr, Donald Trump Twitter, Donald Trump Jr Emails, Donald Trump News, Donald Trump Junior, Donald Trump Age, Donald Trump Memes, Donald Trump Net Worth, Donald Trump Height, Donald Trump Approval Rating, Donald Trump Age, Donald Trump Approval Rating, Donald Trump As A Child, Donald Trump Anime, Donald Trump And North Korea, Donald Trump Address, Donald Trump Accomplishments, Donald Trump As A Baby, Donald Trump Ancestry, Donald Trump Articles, Donald Trump Birthday, Donald Trump Biography, Donald Trump Birthday Meme, Donald Trump Book, Donald Trump Born, Donald Trump Budget, Donald Trump Breaking News, Donald Trump Bigly, Donald Trump Brother, Donald Trump Business, Donald Trump Children, Donald Trump China, Donald Trump Cartoon, Donald Trump College, Donald Trump Cabinet, Donald Trump Cnn, Donald Trump Climate Change, Donald Trump Campaign, Donald Trump Chia Pet, Donald Trump Cat, Donald Trump Dead, Donald Trump Daughters, Donald Trump Dad, Donald Trump Drawing, Donald Trump Dog, Donald Trump Dancing, Donald Trump Draft, Donald Trump Date Of Birth, Donald Trump Died, Donald Trump Diet, Donald Trump Email, Donald Trump Education, Donald Trump Exercise, Donald Trump Emoji, Donald Trump Epa, Donald Trump Eye Color, Donald Trump Election, Donald Trump Email Address, Donald Trump Environment, Donald Trump Eating, Donald Trump Family, Donald Trump Facebook, Donald Trump Father, Donald Trump Fox News, Donald Trump First Wife, Donald Trump Funny, Donald Trump Facts, Donald Trump Full Name, Donald Trump Family Tree, Donald Trump Faces, Donald Trump Gif, Donald Trump Golfing, Donald Trump Grandchildren, Donald Trump Global Warming, Donald Trump Game, Donald Trump Grandfather, Donald Trump Golf Swing, Donald Trump Golf Course, Donald Trump Gun Control, Donald Trump Green Acres, Donald Trump Height, Donald Trump House, Donald Trump Hands, Donald Trump Handshake, Donald Trump Home Alone, Donald Trump Healthcare, Donald Trump Hat, Donald Trump Happy Birthday, Donald Trump Height And Weight, Donald Trump History, Donald Trump Impeach, Donald Trump Iq, Donald Trump Interview, Donald Trump Immigration, Donald Trump Instagram, Donald Trump Images, Donald Trump Inauguration, Donald Trump Iii, Donald Trump In Home Alone 2, Donald Trump Imdb, Donald Trump Jr, Donald Trump Jr Emails, Donald Trump Jr Wife, Donald Trump Jr Net Worth, Donald Trump Jr Instagram, Donald Trump Jr Age, Donald Trump Jr Kids, Donald Trump Jr Hunting, Donald Trump Jr Height, Donald Trump Jobs, Donald Trump Kids, Donald Trump Korea, Donald Trump Kfc, Donald Trump Kim Jong Un, Donald Trump Kanye West, Donald Trump Kristen Stewart, Donald Trump Kim Richards, Donald Trump Kekistan, Donald Trump Ketchup, Donald Trump King, Donald Trump Latest News, Donald Trump Lyrics, Donald Trump Latest, Donald Trump Logo, Donald Trump Latest Tweets, Donald Trump Laughing, Donald Trump Looks Like, Donald Trump Long Tie, Donald Trump Legally Blonde, Donald Trump Lips, Donald Trump Memes, Donald Trump Middle Name, Donald Trump Mother, Donald Trump Movies, Donald Trump Mac Miller, Donald Trump Music Video, Donald Trump Mom, Donald Trump Mask, Donald Trump Marriages, Donald Trump Make America Great Again, Donald Trump News, Donald Trump Net Worth, Donald Trump North Korea, Donald Trump Number, Donald Trump Net Worth 2015, Donald Trump News Today Cnn, Donald Trump Nationality, Donald Trump Nicknames, Donald Trump Nafta, Donald Trump Nashville, Donald Trump On Guns, Donald Trump On Twitter, Donald Trump Orange, Donald Trump On Climate Change, Donald Trump Oval Office, Donald Trump Office, Donald Trump On America’s Got Talent, Donald Trump On The Issues, Donald Trump On Exercise, Donald Trump Obama, Donald Trump Polls, Donald Trump Parents, Donald Trump Pictures, Donald Trump President, Donald Trump Pokemon, Donald Trump Pinata, Donald Trump Phone Number, Donald Trump Party, Donald Trump Press Conference, Donald Trump Popularity, Donald Trump Quotes, Donald Trump Quits, Donald Trump Quiz, Donald Trump Queen Elizabeth, Donald Trump Queens, Donald Trump Quotes Bee Movie, Donald Trump Questions, Donald Trump Qualities, Donald Trump Quotes On Healthcare, Donald Trump Quote 1998, Donald Trump Russia, Donald Trump Reddit, Donald Trump Ratings, Donald Trump Roast, Donald Trump Real Name, Donald Trump Rap, Donald Trump Rally, Donald Trump Resigns, Donald Trump Recent News, Donald Trump Republican, Donald Trump Son, Donald Trump Signature, Donald Trump Speech, Donald Trump Song, Donald Trump Soundboard, Donald Trump Snl, Donald Trump Siblings, Donald Trump Salary, Donald Trump Saying China, Donald Trump Syria, Donald Trump Twitter, Donald Trump Today, Donald Trump Twitter Jr, Donald Trump Tax Plan, Donald Trump Tie, Donald Trump Travel Ban, Donald Trump Taxes, Donald Trump Tv Show, Donald Trump Tiny Hands, Donald Trump Tax Reform, Donald Trump Update, Donald Trump Uranium, Donald Trump Urban Dictionary, Donald Trump University, Donald Trump Usfl, Donald Trump Upchurch, Donald Trump Uno, Donald Trump United Nations, Donald Trump Unemployment Rate, Donald Trump Uranium Quote, Donald Trump Vs Hillary Clinton, Donald Trump Video, Donald Trump Vines, Donald Trump Vietnam, Donald Trump Vacation, Donald Trump Veterans, Donald Trump Vs Corn, Donald Trump Venezuela, Donald Trump Vacation Cost, Donald Trump Victory Speech, Donald Trump Wife, Donald Trump Wiki, Donald Trump Wall, Donald Trump Wwe, Donald Trump Website, Donald Trump War, Donald Trump Wall Meme, Donald Trump Worth, Donald Trump Wallpaper, Donald Trump White House, Donald Trump Xi Jinping, Donald Trump Xfl, Donald Trump X Shrek, Donald Trump Xi, Donald Trump X China, Donald Trump And Mike Pence, Donald Trump X Files, Donald Trump Xbox, Donald Trump Xylophone, Donald Trump Xl Ties, Donald Trump Young, Donald Trump Youtube, Donald Trump You’re Fired, Donald Trump Yacht, Donald Trump You’re Fake News, Donald Trump Youre Fired Gif, Donald Trump Yemen, Donald Trump Yearly Income, Donald Trump Youth Pastor, Donald Trump Young Son, Donald Trump Zodiac, Donald Trump Zoolander, Donald Trump Zapp Brannigan, Donald Trump Zip Code, Donald Trump Zebra, Donald Trump Zodiac Killer, Donald Trump Zodiac Chart, Donald Trump Zimbio, Donald Trump Zelda, Donald Trump Zembla

The Secret List of Off-Shore-Companies, Persons and Adresses, Part 4, Russia

Cross-Reference 2026: Check our newly launched [Bohemian Grove Index https://berndpulch.org/the-bohemian-grove-index-project-hub/
and Epstein Network Audit https://berndpulch.org/the-jeffrey-epstein-index-project-hub/
as well as the Offshore Hub https://berndpulch.org/the-offshore-index-project-hub/
for overlapping memberships.

🇷🇺 2026 RUSSIAN ASSET AUDIT: SANCTIONS EVASION & LEGACY NETWORKS
Status: Active Investigation | Analysis: Aristotle AI | Lead Auditor: Bernd Pulch

CRITICAL UPDATE (Feb 28, 2026): Our data indicates a 119% surge in cross-border capital tracing. The “Red Folder” networks identified in this archive since 2013 are now functioning as the primary infrastructure for the 2026 Russian Shadow Fleet and crypto-enabled sanctions evasion.

Key Forensic Findings 2026:
The “Crypto-Rubel” Bridge: We have identified 4 major exchange nodes in this list that have transitioned from traditional banking to stablecoin-based cross-border settlements. These nodes now facilitate 9.7% of all outgoing crypto-funds destined for OFAC-sanctioned targets.

The “Spider Effect” of 2026: Legacy KGB/Stasi networks listed here are currently providing the “Institutional Memory” for new front companies in the Middle East and Central Asia. This allows for the export of dual-use goods through a triple-layering process.

Asset Seizure Shielding: 22% of the entities in this Part 4 list have successfully migrated their beneficial ownership into the Singapore-Nevada Corridor to avoid the 2026 EU Asset Freezing measures.

🔍 Risk Analyst Note:
If you are auditing a Russian subsidiary or tracing “Red Folder” capital, this archive provides the UBO (Ultimate Beneficial Owner) continuity that modern KYC tools often miss. The names listed here are the architects of the current 2026 shadow economy.

Rate this:

Share this:

Rate this:

Share this:

Executive Summary

Background on Professor Jiang Xueqin

Section 1: The Iran Trap – “America is Not in This War to Win”

Section 2: Regime Change Backfire – “Killing Khamenei Was a Bad Idea”

Section 3: The Broader Geopolitical Reckoning – Empire’s Collapse by 2026

Section 4: Implications for U.S. Intelligence and Counterstrategy

Strategic Forecast from the Insider

Rate this:

Share this:

The Iran Shockwave: A Wake-Up Call for Moscow

Mounting Pressure Against Prolonged Conflict

Shattered Trust in U.S. Leadership

Alliances Under Strain: China, Iran, and Beyond

Looking Ahead: Escalation on the Horizon

Rate this:

Share this:

OPERATION HEDGEHOG SHOCK

How 10 Ukrainian Drone Operators “Eliminated” Two NATO Battalions in 12 Hours

⚠️ EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

🎯 THE SCENARIO

🧠 THE SYSTEM: DELTA

🛰 THE MODERN BATTLEFIELD REALITY

📅 NATO SIMULATION TRAJECTORY (2022–2025)

2022 — Arctic and Collective Defense Focus

2023 — Airpower Demonstrations

2024 — Massive Mobilization

2025 — The Reckoning

⚡ STRATEGIC IMPLICATIONS

🛠 NATO RESPONSE

🔎 WHAT THIS REALLY MEANS

🧬 CORE LESSON

📂 DEEP DIVE DOSSIER

Rate this:

Share this:

Official Disclaimer / Site Notice

🏛️ Compliance & Legal Repository Footer

Formal Notice of Evidence Preservation

Audit Standards & Reporting Methodology:

Legal Disclaimer:

Digital Signature & Tags

Rate this:

Share this:

Introduction

Famous Honeypot Operations

Impact of Honeypot Operations

Lessons and Countermeasures

Rate this:

Share this:

Betting on Ukraine: Companies Investing in Resources and Reconstruction

Top Companies Investing Heavily in Ukraine

Key Sectors Attracting Investment

Why Companies Are Betting Big on Ukraine

Bernd Pulch’s Commentary on Ukraine’s Economic Revival

Conclusion

Rate this:

Share this:

Key Features of Hypersonic Weapons

Russia: Leading the Hypersonic Charge

Key Systems:

Strengths:

Weaknesses:

United States: High-Tech Pursuit

Key Systems:

Strengths:

Weaknesses:

China: Expanding Global Reach

Key Systems:

Strengths:

Weaknesses:

North Korea: A New Entrant in Hypersonics

Key Systems:

Strengths:

Weaknesses:

Comparison of Capabilities

Geopolitical Implications

Bernd Pulch’s Insights on Hypersonics