Laura Loomer: “I Would Kill Putin” โ€“ Russia Launches Deadly Overnight Attack on Kyiv

๐Ÿ“บ YouTube: youtube.com/@bernd_pulch
๐Ÿฆ X (Twitter): x.com/berndsocial1
๐Ÿ“ข Telegram: t.me/ABOVETOPSECRETXXL
๐Ÿ”“ UNLOCK THE TRUTH: berndpulch.org/join



Laura Loomer Calls for Putinโ€™s Assassination โ€“ Russia Bombards Kyiv in Deadly Overnight Attack

A stunning reversal from a prominent MAGA influencer: Laura Loomer, once a vocal critic of U.S. military aid to Ukraine, has declared she would “kill Vladimir Putin” if Russia continues to supply weapons to Iran. The statement came as Russia launched a massive overnight missile and drone attack on Kyiv that killed at least nine people and injured dozens more.



Loomer’s Shocking Uโ€‘Turn

Laura Loomer, the American ultra-right activist and ally of Donald Trump, made the explosive remarks following a visit to Ukraine. In an interview, she stated that if she were U.S. president, she would “kill Vladimir Putin” if Russia supplied weapons to Iran.

“If I were Trump, I would kill Putin,” Loomer declared.

She emphasized that she was not speaking on behalf of Donald Trump and was not calling on him to take such action. Her reasoning: Russia, by arming Iran, is helping a state that could potentially use those weapons against American forces.

From Pro-Russia to Pro-Ukraine

Loomer’s transformation is stark. She admitted that she had been “misled by Russian propaganda” for years and had promoted narratives favorable to Moscow. She also acknowledged having collaborated with Russian-linked media, including RT.

During her visit, Loomer traveled to Kyiv, Bucha, and the Kyiv Pechersk Lavra, and met with President Volodymyr Zelensky. She experienced Russian airstrikes firsthand. Now, she fully supports Ukraine, backs the supply of additional Patriot missiles, and advocates for joint U.S.-Ukrainian drone production.

“I was misled by Russian propaganda. I promoted narratives beneficial to Moscow, and now I admit I was wrong,” Loomer said.

Loomer warned that if Russia captures Ukraine, it could next target other European countries and, eventually, NATO members. She argued that supporting Ukraine now is far cheaper for the U.S. than a future war with Russia.



Russia’s Deadly Overnight Barrage on Kyiv

While Loomer was making headlines, Russia launched a massive overnight attack on Ukraine’s capital. The assault, which took place on August 1, involved 35 missiles, including 27 ballistic missiles, and 185 attack drones of various types.

The Human Toll

At least nine people were killed and 28 injured, including children. Kyiv’s Mayor Vitali Klitschko confirmed that residential buildings in multiple districts were hit.

In the Darnytskyi district, seven people were killed and 14 injured. In the Solomyanskyi district, two people died and eight were injured when a five-story residential building was partially destroyed.

Widespread Destruction

Fires broke out across five districts of the city, and power cuts were reported in some areas. The attack damaged residential buildings, vehicles, administrative offices, and even the Lithuanian Embassy.

A residential building in the Shevchenkivskyi district was partially destroyed, trapping people inside. Rescue workers searched through the rubble for survivors.

“There have been many explosions in the city. Kyiv is under ballistic missile attack. Stay in shelter!” โ€“ Vitali Klitschko, Kyiv Mayor



Ukraine’s Desperate Plea for Air Defenses

The attack came just two days after another large-scale Russian strike killed at least 10 people across Ukraine and saw a Russian missile briefly enter Polish airspace. Ukraine is critically short of anti-ballistic missile defenses, with only one Patriot interceptor reportedly having been used during the massive barrage.

President Volodymyr Zelensky reiterated Ukraine’s urgent need for additional Patriot air defense systems from the United States and its Western allies. He had just met with President Donald Trump in Washington earlier this week to urge the U.S. to grant Ukraine a license to produce Patriot interceptor missiles.

Trump has not yet agreed, stating that the U.S. must be “very careful” about sharing advanced weaponry.



A Stark Contrast

Loomer’s dramatic change of heart stands in stark contrast to the grim reality unfolding in Kyiv. While she now advocates for stronger U.S. support for Ukraine, the very attacks she witnessed during her visit continue to claim civilian lives. Her statement that she would “kill Putin” underscores the depth of her transformationโ€”and the escalating tensions between Russia and the West.



๐Ÿ“บ YouTube: youtube.com/@bernd_pulch
๐Ÿฆ X (Twitter): x.com/berndsocial1
๐Ÿ“ข Telegram: t.me/ABOVETOPSECRETXXL
๐Ÿ”“ UNLOCK THE TRUTH: berndpulch.org/join

๐Ÿ“บ YouTube: youtube.com/@bernd_pulch
๐Ÿฆ X (Twitter): x.com/berndsocial1
๐Ÿ“ข Telegram: t.me/ABOVETOPSECRETXXL
๐Ÿ”“ UNLOCK THE TRUTH: berndpulch.org/join



Laura Loomer fordert Putins Ermordung โ€“ Russland bombardiert Kiew mit tรถdlichem Nachtangriff

Eine verblรผffende Kehrtwende einer prominenten MAGA-Influencerin: Laura Loomer, einst eine scharfe Kritikerin der US-Militรคrhilfe fรผr die Ukraine, hat erklรคrt, sie wรผrde Wladimir Putin “tรถten”, falls Russland weiterhin Waffen an den Iran liefere. Die ร„uรŸerung fiel, wรคhrend Russland einen massiven nรคchtlichen Raketen- und Drohnenangriff auf Kiew startete, bei dem mindestens neun Menschen getรถtet und Dutzende verletzt wurden.



Loomers schockierende Kehrtwende

Die amerikanische Ultra-Rechtsaktivistin und Verbรผndete Donald Trumps รคuรŸerte sich nach einem Besuch in der Ukraine. In einem Interview erklรคrte sie, dass sie als US-Prรคsidentin Wladimir Putin “tรถten” wรผrde, falls Russland Waffen an den Iran liefere.

“Wenn ich Trump wรคre, wรผrde ich Putin tรถten”, erklรคrte Loomer.

Sie betonte, dass sie nicht im Namen Donald Trumps spreche und ihn nicht auffordere, eine solche Aktion durchzufรผhren. Ihre Begrรผndung: Russland helfe durch die Bewaffnung des Iran einem Staat, der diese Waffen mรถglicherweise gegen amerikanische Streitkrรคfte einsetzen kรถnnte.

Von pro-russisch zu pro-ukrainisch

Loomers Wandel ist bemerkenswert. Sie rรคumte ein, dass sie jahrelang “von russischer Propaganda in die Irre gefรผhrt” worden sei und russlandfreundliche Narrative verbreitet habe. Sie gab auch zu, mit russlandnahen Medien, einschlieรŸlich RT, zusammengearbeitet zu haben.

Wรคhrend ihres Besuchs reiste Loomer nach Kiew, Bucha und in die Kiewer Hรถhlenkloster, wo sie Prรคsident Wolodymyr Selenskyj traf. Sie erlebte russische Luftangriffe aus nรคchster Nรคhe. Nun unterstรผtzt sie die Ukraine voll und ganz, befรผrwortet die Lieferung weiterer Patriot-Raketen und setzt sich fรผr eine gemeinsame US-ukrainische Drohnenproduktion ein.

“Ich wurde von russischer Propaganda in die Irre gefรผhrt. Ich habe Narrative verbreitet, die Moskau nรผtzten, und jetzt gebe ich zu, dass ich falsch lag”, sagte Loomer.

Sie warnte davor, dass Russland nach der Eroberung der Ukraine als Nรคchstes andere europรคische Lรคnder und schlieรŸlich NATO-Mitglieder ins Visier nehmen kรถnnte. Die Unterstรผtzung der Ukraine sei fรผr die USA jetzt weitaus billiger als ein spรคterer Krieg mit Russland.



Russlands tรถdlicher Nachtangriff auf Kiew

Wรคhrend Loomer fรผr Schlagzeilen sorgte, startete Russland einen massiven nรคchtlichen Angriff auf die ukrainische Hauptstadt. Der Angriff am 1. August umfasste 35 Raketen, darunter 27 ballistische Raketen, und 185 Angriffsdrohnen verschiedener Typen.

Die menschlichen Kosten

Mindestens neun Menschen wurden getรถtet und 28 verletzt, darunter Kinder. Kiews Bรผrgermeister Vitali Klitschko bestรคtigte, dass Wohngebรคude in mehreren Bezirken getroffen wurden.

Im Bezirk Darnyzkyj wurden sieben Menschen getรถtet und 14 verletzt. Im Bezirk Solomjanskyj kamen zwei Menschen ums Leben und acht wurden verletzt, als ein fรผnfstรถckiges Wohngebรคude teilweise zerstรถrt wurde.

Weitreichende Zerstรถrung

In fรผnf Bezirken der Stadt brachen Brรคnde aus, in einigen Gebieten wurde der Strom abgeschaltet. Der Angriff beschรคdigte Wohngebรคude, Fahrzeuge, Verwaltungsgebรคude und sogar die litauische Botschaft.

Ein Wohngebรคude im Bezirk Schewtschenko wurde teilweise zerstรถrt, Menschen wurden unter den Trรผmmern eingeschlossen. Rettungskrรคfte durchsuchten die Trรผmmer nach รœberlebenden.

“In der Stadt gab es viele Explosionen. Kiew wird mit ballistischen Raketen angegriffen. Bleiben Sie in Schutzrรคumen!” โ€“ Vitali Klitschko, Bรผrgermeister von Kiew



Die verzweifelte Bitte der Ukraine um Luftverteidigung

Der Angriff erfolgte nur zwei Tage, nachdem ein weiterer groรŸ angelegter russischer Angriff mindestens zehn Menschen in der gesamten Ukraine getรถtet hatte und eine russische Rakete kurzzeitig den polnischen Luftraum verletzte. Der Ukraine fehlen dringend Abwehrsysteme gegen ballistische Raketen. Berichten zufolge wurde wรคhrend des massiven Angriffs nur eine Patriot-Abwehrrakete eingesetzt.

Prรคsident Wolodymyr Selenskyj bekrรคftigte den dringenden Bedarf der Ukraine an weiteren Patriot-Luftverteidigungssystemen aus den USA und ihren westlichen Verbรผndeten. Erst diese Woche hatte er Prรคsident Donald Trump in Washington getroffen, um ihn zu drรคngen, der Ukraine eine Lizenz zur Herstellung von Patriot-Abfangraketen zu erteilen.

Trump hat dem bislang nicht zugestimmt und erklรคrt, die USA mรผssten bei der Weitergabe hochentwickelter Waffen “sehr vorsichtig” sein.



Ein krasser Kontrast

Loomers dramatischer Sinneswandel steht in krassem Kontrast zu der dรผsteren Realitรคt in Kiew. Wรคhrend sie nun fรผr eine stรคrkere Unterstรผtzung der Ukraine durch die USA eintritt, fordern die Angriffe, die sie wรคhrend ihres Besuchs miterlebte, weiterhin zivile Opfer. Ihre Aussage, sie wรผrde Putin “tรถten”, unterstreicht das AusmaรŸ ihrer Wandlung โ€“ und die eskalierenden Spannungen zwischen Russland und dem Westen.



๐Ÿ“บ YouTube: youtube.com/@bernd_pulch
๐Ÿฆ X (Twitter): x.com/berndsocial1
๐Ÿ“ข Telegram: t.me/ABOVETOPSECRETXXL
๐Ÿ”“ UNLOCK THE TRUTH: berndpulch.org/join

Iranโ€™s Nuclear Bomb in 2 Weeks? Escobar and Nimaโ€™s Explosive Claim UnpackedโœŒ

“Stunning view of Iranโ€™s potential nuclear threat by June 29, 2025, with Middle East tensions. Explore Escobar & Nimaโ€™s claim on berndpulch.org. #IranNuclear #Geopolitics2025 #EconomicImpact”

Iranโ€™s Nuclear Bomb in 2 Weeks? Escobar and Nimaโ€™s Explosive Claim Unpacked

Introduction

On Saturday, June 14, 2025, the Dialogue Works podcast, hosted by Nima Rostami Alkhorshid, featured geopolitical analyst Pepe Escobar in a discussion that sent ripples across online forums and social media. Nima, a Persian academic and podcaster based in Brazil, reportedly claimed that Iran could or will possess a nuclear bomb within two weeks, a timeframe that, if true, would mark a seismic shift in global security. This assertion, tied to Escobarโ€™s insights, demands a critical examination. Is this a realistic projection, a strategic signal, or a provocative overreach? For berndpulch.org readers, understanding the stakesโ€”geopolitical, economic, and moralโ€”is paramount as we navigate this uncharted territory.


The Claim in Context

The statement emerged during a podcast episode addressing escalating tensions in the Middle East, particularly following recent Israeli strikes on Iran and Iranโ€™s retaliatory missile attacks. Nima, leveraging his Persian heritage and contacts, suggested Iranโ€™s technical capability to rapidly develop a nuclear weapon, a notion Escobar may have contextualized with his extensive network of Asian intelligence sources. This aligns with Escobarโ€™s recent narratives, such as his April 2024 claims of an Israeli nuclear plot thwarted by Russia, which, while unverified, highlighted Iranโ€™s strategic vulnerabilities.

The two weeks timeline is strikingly short, contrasting with longer estimates from the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and Western analysts, who have suggested Iran could produce enough fissile material for a bomb in weeks to months, with weaponization taking up to a year. Nimaโ€™s claim may reflect insider knowledge, a misinterpretation, or a deliberate escalation to provoke dialogueโ€”fitting Dialogue Worksโ€™ mission to challenge narratives. Without an official transcript, the ambiguity between โ€œcouldโ€ and โ€œwillโ€ fuels speculation, but the intent seems to signal urgency.


Technical Feasibility: Can Iran Do It?

Iranโ€™s nuclear program has advanced significantly since the 2015 dealโ€™s collapse. The IAEAโ€™s latest report (June 2025) confirms Iran has amassed 43.1 kg of uranium enriched to 60% purity, nearing the 90% threshold for weapons-grade material. Experts estimate 25 kg at 90% is sufficient for one bomb, meaning Iran might need to enrich an additional 10โ€“15 kg. With its advanced centrifuges (e.g., IR-6 models), Iran could theoretically achieve this in 1โ€“2 weeks under optimal conditions, per IAEA Director General Rafael Grossiโ€™s 2022 assessment of a โ€œmatter of weeksโ€ for material acquisition.

However, weaponizationโ€”designing a deliverable bombโ€”poses a steeper challenge. Iran lacks publicly confirmed tests of a nuclear explosive device, and its expertise, while growing, relies on historical data from the pre-2003 Amad program. The establishment narrative claims Iran is years from mastery, but skeptics argue clandestine progress, possibly with North Korean or Russian assistance, could accelerate this. A two-week timeline assumes pre-existing components and a decision to defy the fatwa against nuclear weapons by Supreme Leader Khameneiโ€”a bold leap unsupported by current evidence.

Critically, this hinges on Iranโ€™s intent. Posts on X suggest some believe Iranโ€™s restraint is tactical, not doctrinal, yet no definitive proof of an active weapons program exists. The claimโ€™s plausibility rests on a rapid, secretive pivot, which, while technically possible, strains credibility without leaks or satellite confirmation.


Geopolitical Implications

If Iran acquires a nuclear bomb by June 28, 2025, the Middle Eastโ€™s power balance would shatter. Israel, with its undeclared arsenal, might preemptively strike, risking a regional war involving the U.S., Russia, and China. Iranโ€™s alliesโ€”Hezbollah, Houthis, and potentially Russiaโ€”could escalate proxy conflicts, while Saudi Arabia might accelerate its own nuclear ambitions, possibly through Pakistan.

Escobarโ€™s past reports, like the alleged Russian downing of an Israeli F-35 in 2024, suggest a narrative where Russia and China back Iran to counter Western dominance. A nuclear Iran could embolden this axis, challenging NATOโ€™s eastern flank and U.S. sanctions leverage. However, the establishment downplays this, framing Iranโ€™s program as peaceful, a stance undermined by its refusal to cooperate with IAEA inspections at undeclared sites.

The two-week window also pressures diplomacy. The U.S. and Europe might rush negotiations, but Israelโ€™s recent attacks (e.g., Rishon LeZion, June 2025) indicate a hair-trigger response. X sentiment reflects fear of miscalculation, with some users predicting a โ€œWorld War IIIโ€ triggerโ€”a scenario this site has explored in prior analyses.


Economic Ramifications

A nuclear-capable Iran would roil global markets. Oil prices, already at $95/bbl due to Red Sea disruptions, could surge past $150/bbl if the Strait of Hormuz faces threats, halting 20% of global oil flows. The S&P 500 might drop 10โ€“15%, as investors flee to gold (up 15% in panic scenarios) and the U.S. dollar strengthens as a safe haven. Inflation could hit 10% globally, with food and fuel shortages hitting vulnerable regions hardest.

Supply chains, already strained by Ukraine and Taiwan tensions, would face new bottlenecks, especially for electronics reliant on Middle Eastern logistics. Emerging markets like India and Brazil (Nimaโ€™s base) might see capital outflows, reversing 2025 growth forecasts from 3.2% to below 1%. The establishment might spin this as manageable, but historical oil shocks (e.g., 1973) suggest deeper recessions loom if escalation persists.


Critical Analysis: Truth or Hype?

The claimโ€™s sourceโ€”Nimaโ€™s contacts and Escobarโ€™s intel networkโ€”lacks public corroboration, a red flag given Escobarโ€™s history of single-source stories (e.g., the 2024 F-35 claim, widely debunked). The establishment dismisses such reports as propaganda, but their opacity invites skepticism. Iranโ€™s technical capacity supports a material timeline, yet the political will and operational secrecy required for a two-week bomb stretch credulity.

X posts hint at Iranian defiance post-Israelโ€™s strikes, but sentiment alone isnโ€™t evidence. The IAEAโ€™s data, while authoritative, may understate Iranโ€™s progress due to limited access. Conversely, overhyping a nuclear breakout could serve Western hawks or Iranian hardliners, each with agendas. Without hard proofโ€”satellite imagery, defector testimony, or an Iranian testโ€”this remains a provocative hypothesis, not fact.


Conclusion

Nima and Escobarโ€™s claim that Iran could or will have a nuclear bomb in two weeks by June 28, 2025, ignites a firestorm of speculation. Technically feasible for material enrichment, it falters on weaponization and intent. Geopolitically, it risks war; economically, it threatens collapse. Yet, without verifiable evidence, itโ€™s a call to watch closely rather than panic. For berndpulch.org readers, the lesson is clear: question narratives, monitor developments, and prepare for volatility. The next fortnight will test this predictionโ€™s mettleโ€”stay vigilant.

Support Independent Truth: Donate Now to BerndPulch.org!
As we uncover critical stories like Iranโ€™s potential nuclear move by June 29, 2025, your support keeps us fearless. Donate today to fuel our research and analysis. Every euro countsโ€”click below  to contribute!

https://berndpulch.org/donation

Why Donate?

  • Exclusive insights on global crises.
  • Ad-free, unbiased reporting.
  • Your voice in challenging the narrative.

Donate Now

๐Ÿ” OFFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SOURCES
๐ŸŸข Primary Domain: BerndPulch.org – Licensed Intelligence Media
๐Ÿ”„ Mirror Site: GoogleFirst.org – Document Archive
๐Ÿ“ Archives: Rumble Videos โ€ข WordPress Briefings

๐Ÿ’Ž CLASSIFIED ACCESS
๐Ÿ”“ Patrons receive:

  • ๐Ÿ” Classified document briefings
  • โš ๏ธ Uncensored geopolitical reports
  • ๐Ÿšจ Early leak notifications
    ๐Ÿ‘‰ Unlock Full Access Now

๐Ÿ“œ VERIFIED CREDENTIALS

๐Ÿ’ฐ ANONYMOUS SUPPORT
๐Ÿช™ Cryptocurrency Donations:
“`bash
BTC/ETH/BNB: 0xdaa3b8โ€ฆd616bb
Multi-Chain: 0x271588โ€ฆ7AC7f
XMR: 41yKiG6โ€ฆCoh