Tag: director of national intelligence

Gabbard Releases Explosive Biolab Documents โ€“ Over 120 U.S.-Funded Labs Exposed

Gabbard’s Biolab Disclosure: A Window into the Hidden World of U.S. Research Funding

On June 12, 2026, outgoing Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard released comprehensive intelligence documents revealing the U.S. government’s long-standing funding of more than 120 biological laboratories across over 30 countries.

The Release at a Glance

The disclosure was published on the official ODNI website under the press release “DNI Gabbard Reveals Evidence of U.S. Taxpayer-Funded Global Biolab Program”. Gabbard simultaneously announced the release on the platform X:

“Today, I’m releasing never before seen intelligence revealing new evidence of past US government funding for more than 120 biolabs in over 30 countries, including Ukraine.”

The documents are the result of months of searching through Intelligence Community holdings and files and rank among Gabbard’s final major official acts before her resignation effective June 30, 2026.

The Contents of the Released Documents

The publication includes:

ยท An interactive map showing laboratory locations worldwide
ยท Detailed information on funding streams and research priorities
ยท Lists of stored pathogens, including anthrax, Ebola, MERS, SARS, and plague
ยท Evidence of Gain-of-Function research on highly dangerous pathogens

Particularly sensitive: More than 40 laboratories are located in Ukraine โ€“ a circumstance that, according to Gabbard, poses a significant security risk due to the ongoing war. These facilities reportedly conducted research on Especially Dangerous Pathogens (EDPs).

One slide within the new ODNI report states that more than 40 laboratories in Ukraine were built or supported through U.S. government funding.

The Political Context

The disclosure comes in direct connection with President Trump’s Executive Order 14292 of May 25, 2025, which ended federal funding for Gain-of-Function research worldwide.

Gabbard used the release for sharp attacks on the previous administration:

“Despite the obvious potential for catastrophic global impact research on dangerous pathogens in biolabs can have, politicians, so-called health professionals like Dr. Fauci, and entities within the Biden administration’s national security team lied to the American people about the existence of U.S.-funded and supported biolabs, and threatened those who attempted to expose the truth.”

Gabbard further alleged that the information had been “knowingly withheld” from the American public and that those who spoke out were accused of being foreign assets and traitors.

Critics, however, accused Gabbard of reviving Kremlin-backed disinformation narratives. The topic of U.S. biolabs in Ukraine had previously been repeatedly instrumentalized by Moscow as a justification for its invasion. Outlets noted that Gabbard had earned the nickname “Russia’s girlfriend” in Russian state media for her repeated promotion of pro-Kremlin claims.

Where the Original Documents Can Be Found

The complete materials are available on the official website of the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI):

๐Ÿ”— Official Press Release:
https://www.dni.gov/index.php/newsroom/press-releases/press-releases-2026/4163-pr-10-26

๐Ÿ“„ Direct Link to the Documents (PDF):
https://www.dni.gov/files/BIOLAB_Slides.pdf

Conclusion

The biolab release of June 12, 2026, marks another climax of Gabbard’s controversial tenure as Director of National Intelligence. While supporters welcome the disclosure as a long-overdue act of transparency, critics see it as the continuation of a politically motivated campaign that places scientific institutions under blanket suspicion and provides narrative material for adversarial propaganda.

What is certain: The now-publicly accessible documents offer a rare glimpse into the global research infrastructure of the United States โ€“ and are likely to fuel the debate over security, oversight, and the ethical boundaries of biological research for a long time to come. Gabbard also issued new guidance to the Intelligence Community directing increased collection on these overseas facilities, raising significant ethical, financial, and security concerns.

Original Fauci Documents Released โ€“ Full ODNI Archive Now Public

A Bill Gates Covid Parody Image: Gates as Freddy Krueger, the fictionous villain from the “Nightmate on Elm Street” horror movie franchise

Gabbard’s Final Act: Declassified Documents Implicate Fauci in COVID-19 Origins Debate

On her last day as Director of National Intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard released a trove of documents that she claims prove Dr. Anthony Fauci influenced intelligence community assessments on the origins of COVID-19 and lied under oath to Congress.

A Farewell with Political Explosiveness

On June 19, 2026 โ€“ Gabbard’s final working day as head of U.S. intelligence โ€“ the outgoing Director of National Intelligence released hundreds of pages of previously unpublished communications and internal documents. The release followed a year-long review under President Trump’s “Maximum Transparency” executive order.

In a video statement accompanying the release, Gabbard accused Fauci of using his relationships within the intelligence community to shield himself from scrutiny and to influence the government’s assessments of the pandemic’s origins.

“The COVID-19 pandemic has caused immense suffering and pain to millions of our fellow Americans and countless people around the world,” Gabbard said in her statement. “After years of lies, censorship, and cover-ups, the American people deserve transparency, truth, and accountability.”

The Core Allegations Against Fauci

According to the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) , the released documents allegedly demonstrate the following:

  1. Influence on Intelligence Assessments: Fauci participated in discussions regarding the intelligence community’s review of COVID-19 origins during his tenure as director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) . He provided recommendations on which experts to consult and helped shape assessments that were later presented as scientific consensus.
  2. Cover-up of Contacts: An August 2021 email from the Intelligence Community Inspector General cites a whistleblower complaint alleging that Fauci made “false statements before Congress.” Fauci had testified in his 2024 appearance before the House Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic that he had no knowledge of discussions with intelligence agencies regarding virus research. However, the newly released documents show multiple interactions between Fauci and intelligence officials.
  3. Funding of Research at the Wuhan Institute: The ODNI alleges that Fauci oversaw the funding of coronavirus research involving bat viruses at the Wuhan Institute of Virology. This research allegedly involved “gain-of-function” studies and is linked to a possible laboratory accident.
  4. Suppression of Dissenting Views: The documents purportedly show that Fauci collaborated with politicized career officials within the intelligence community to suppress the truth about the lab origins of the virus. Gabbard further claimed that intelligence officials suppressed dissenting voices, including those who supported the lab-leak hypothesis.

The Contents of the Release

The publication includes:

ยท Internal communications among intelligence officials
ยท Whistleblower statements from employees who alleged retaliation for questioning official assessments
ยท Intelligence materials related to debates over the pandemic’s origins

Particularly explosive: A July 2021 internal email shows that intelligence officials considered Fauci a “SME” (Subject Matter Expert) “who likely knows better than most who the true coronavirus experts are.” Officials wanted to take his recommendations into account when contacting scientists during the Biden administration’s 90-day review in 2021.

An assessment report from the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory dated May 2020 concluded that conditions in Wuhan were conducive to the “accidental release of a laboratory-modified coronavirus.”

At the same time, the documents also contain indications that intelligence officials rejected Fauci as an external reviewer of their COVID-19 origins assessment โ€“ on the grounds that he had a conflict of interest.

Reactions and Context

The release came amid a power struggle over Gabbard’s succession. President Trump had appointed Bill Pulte as acting director, drawing criticism from both parties in the Senate. Senate Majority Leader John Thune warned: “We don’t need a weapon called the DNI; we need professionals there.”

Critics, however, pointed out that the released documents do not provide definitive evidence for the alleged connections. The U.S. intelligence community has still not reached a definitive conclusion on whether the virus originated from a laboratory or through natural transmission. The documents have not been independently verified.

Fauci himself has repeatedly denied the allegations, calling them “ridiculous” during a June 2024 hearing. He emphasized that both a natural origin and a laboratory accident are possible explanations for the emergence of the virus, with available evidence in his view pointing more toward natural transmission โ€“ though not definitively.

Conclusion

The document release of June 19, 2026, marks one of the final and most controversial acts of Tulsi Gabbard’s tenure as Director of National Intelligence. While supporters welcome the publication as a long-overdue step toward greater transparency, critics see it as a politically motivated attempt to reignite the debate over the pandemic’s origins just before Gabbard’s departure.

What is certain: The question of COVID-19’s origins and the role of the U.S. government in pandemic response remains politically and scientifically contentious โ€“ and the newly released documents are likely to fuel this debate for a long time to come.

The original declassified documents are available on the official ODNI website at http://www.odni.gov/index.php/newsroom/reports-publications/reports-publications-2026/4165-fauci-funded-wuhan-lab-research-that-sparked-covid.

TOP SECRET DOCUMENT – The Director Of National Intelligence About The Saudi Journalist Murder

Become a Patron!
True Information is the most valuable resource and we ask you to give back.

Rights groups demand justice on anniversary of Khashoggi murder
Jamal Khashoggi

Continue reading “TOP SECRET DOCUMENT – The Director Of National Intelligence About The Saudi Journalist Murder” →

SECRET-Director of National Intelligence Classification and Control Markings Manual Version 1.2

The following Classification and Control Markings Manualย gives descriptions of every major classification and control marking used in the U.S. Intelligence Community along with its legal justifications and goes with the Authorized Classification and Control Markings Register.ย  Newer versions of the manual have been released via FOIA requests, however they contain a number of redactions.

(U) Authority

(U) DCID 6/6 dated 13 July 2001, mandates a classification marking system for the Intelligence Community (IC). This system uses a uniform list of security classification and control markings authorized for all dissemination of classified national intelligence information by components of the IC. This marking system augments and further defines the markings requirements established in Executive Order 12958, as amended, for portion markings and overall classification. This system does not stipulate or modify the classification authority information required by EO 12958, as amended.

(U) These classification and control markings, and their authorized abbreviations and portion markings, are compiled in the Authorized Classification and Control Markings Register maintained by the Controlled Access Program Coordination Office (CAPCO) (hereafter, referred to as the CAPCO Register) of the Director of National Intelligence Special Security Center (DNI SSC) pursuant to DCID 6/11.

(U) Purpose

(U) The Implementation Manual is a companion document developed to provide amplifying and explanatory guidance on the syntax and use of the markings contained in the CAPCO Register. While not the policy basis for individual agenciesโ€™ use of any particular marking, the Implementation Manual cites the applicable authority and sponsor for each marking. Some of the Dissemination Controls and Non-Intelligence Community Dissemination Control Markings are restricted to use by certain agencies. They are included to provide guidance on handling documents that bear them. Their inclusion in the manual does not authorize other Agencies to use these markings. Non-US Classification and Joint Classification Markings are restricted to the respective countries or international organizations.

(U) Certain unpublished controlled access program markings or markings that only determine addressing or routing of information are not included in the Implementation Manual per the CAPCO Register. The unpublished markings are contained in a separate unpublished Register maintained by CAPCO. Contact the CAPCO staff if you have questions regarding these items.

โ€ฆ