Featured

Syria Sentences Bashar al-Assad to Death in Absentia โ€“ As Former Al-Qaeda Commander Leads Country

Syria Sentences Bashar alโ€‘Assad to Death in Absentia โ€“ As Former Alโ€‘Qaeda Commander Now Leads the Country

A Damascus criminal court has sentenced former Syrian president Bashar alโ€‘Assad to death in absentia, convicting him of crimes against humanity, war crimes, premeditated murder, torture and arbitrary arrest committed during the country’s nearly 14โ€‘year civil war. The landmark ruling also condemned his brother Maher alโ€‘Assad and five other former military and security officials to death.



The Verdict

On August 11, 2026, Judge Fakhr alโ€‘Din alโ€‘Aryan of the Fourth Criminal Court in Damascus delivered the historic judgment. The court found Assad guilty of โ€œpremeditated and intentional murder of more than one person and of children, torture, arbitrary arrest and crimes against humanityโ€.

The trial lasted nearly four months. Assad, who fled to Russia after his regime was overthrown in December 2024, was tried in absentia along with most other defendants. The only accused to appear in person was Atef Najib, Assad’s cousin and former security chief in Daraa province, who was arrested in early 2025 and stood trial in a cage wearing a prison uniform.

In addition to Assad and Najib, the court sentenced:

ยท Maher alโ€‘Assad โ€“ Bashar’s younger brother and commander of the feared Fourth Armoured Division โ€“ to death in absentia
ยท Fahd alโ€‘Freij โ€“ former defence minister โ€“ to death in absentia
ยท Four other unnamed former military and security officials



The Crimes

The charges stem from Assad’s brutal crackdown on the 2011 proโ€‘democracy protests, which spiralled into a civil war that killed hundreds of thousands of Syrians.

The court established that Assad, as โ€œthe highest decisionโ€‘makerโ€, bore direct responsibility for directing state institutions to commit systematic violations. His brother Maher led the Fourth Division, which spearheaded the crackdown on protests, recaptured territory and was accused of running a drug trafficking network to enrich the regime.

Atef Najib, the former head of political security in Daraa, was convicted for his role in the 2011 torture of 15 teenage boys who had graffitied antiโ€‘Assad slogans โ€“ an event widely seen as the spark that ignited the nationwide uprising.



Reaction in Syria: โ€œThe Joy Is Indescribableโ€

As news of the verdict spread, crowds gathered outside the courthouse in Damascus, chanting, applauding and waving Syrian flags. Celebrations also erupted in Daraa, the birthplace of the revolution.

โ€œThe joy is indescribable. God willing we will see Bashar alโ€‘Assad and all his aides hanging on the gallows.โ€ โ€“ A man in Damascus, holding a photo of his late father.

Nouha alโ€‘Masri, a prosecutor in the case who lost her brother in the 2011 Daraa massacre, told the BBC:

โ€œWe have been waiting for 15 years to reclaim even a small part of our rightsโ€ฆ In the new Syria, there will be no impunity from this day forward.โ€



The New Government: From Terrorist to President

The court that convicted Assad sits in a Syria that has undergone a radical transformation. The regime that fell in December 2024 was overthrown by a coalition of rebel forces led by Hay’at Tahrir alโ€‘Sham (HTS) โ€“ a group with deep roots in Alโ€‘Qaeda and still designated as a terrorist organisation by the United States, the United Kingdom and the European Union.

The man who now leads Syria is Ahmed alโ€‘Sharaa, formerly known as Abu Mohammad alโ€‘Jolani. Just a few years ago, he was one of the most wanted terrorists in the world, with a **$10 million U.S. bounty** on his head. The U.S. designated him a “specially designated global terrorist” in 2013, and the FBI maintained a Rewards for Justice programme offering the $10 million reward for information leading to his capture as recently as 2017.

In January 2025, alโ€‘Sharaa was declared Syria’s transitional president. An interim constitutional declaration came into effect in March, and a new government was established under HTS leadership. Alโ€‘Sharaa has since appointed a 210โ€‘member parliament, with 70 lawmakers directly appointed by him, and has consolidated executive authority while operating an extensive patronage network.

The irony is stark: a man once hunted by the U.S. as a terrorist now meets with American officials. In November 2025, alโ€‘Sharaa visited the White House, where President Trump received him. U.S. officials have acknowledged direct contacts with HTS, and while they have noted alโ€‘Sharaa’s welcome comments about protecting minority and women’s rights, they remain sceptical about his longโ€‘term intentions. The U.S. embassy in Syria, meanwhile, has not removed its “WANTED” notice for the man it once offered $10 million to capture.

Britain, too, continues to outlaw HTS, while the EU maintains financial sanctions against alโ€‘Jolani. The new Syrian leadership thus exists in a state of diplomatic limbo: internationally recognised as the de facto government, yet led by individuals still designated as terrorists by the very powers now negotiating with them.



Symbolic Justice or Practical Dead End?

While the verdict is a powerful symbol of transitional justice, its practical impact is limited. Assad and his brother remain in Moscow, where they were granted asylum on humanitarian grounds. Russia has previously declined extradition requests.

Human rights activists warn that the death sentence could complicate any future extradition, as countries generally refuse to surrender suspects to nations where they face execution. Syria’s new authorities have said they will pursue โ€œinternational legal avenuesโ€ to try to prosecute the two men.



A New Chapter for Syria

The trial is part of a broader effort by Syria’s interim government to break with the Assad dynasty’s fiveโ€‘decade legacy of repression. Since the regime fell in December 2024, authorities have detained numerous former officials and launched investigations into atrocities.

The verdict was described by prosecutors as โ€œas big as the sacrifices that Syrians gave for 15 yearsโ€. For many, it is a first step toward accountability โ€“ even if the former dictator himself remains beyond reach.

Yet the question of who now holds power in Syria remains deeply uncomfortable for the international community. The man who signed the order to try Assad is himself a former Alโ€‘Qaeda commander, still wanted by many of the same nations that applaud the verdict. In Syria, justice for Assad’s victims is being delivered by a government that, until recently, was itself considered a terrorist organisation. The paradox could not be more acute.



๐Ÿ“บ YouTube: youtube.com/@bernd_pulch
๐Ÿฆ X (Twitter): x.com/berndsocial1
๐Ÿ“ข Telegram: t.me/ABOVETOPSECRETXXL
๐Ÿ”“ UNLOCK THE TRUTH: berndpulch.org/join

Syrien verurteilt Assad zum Tode โ€“ wรคhrend Ex-Terrorist das Land regiert

Ein Strafgericht in Damaskus hat den frรผheren syrischen Prรคsidenten Baschar al-Assad in Abwesenheit zum Tode verurteilt. Der Schuldspruch umfasst Verbrechen gegen die Menschlichkeit, Kriegsverbrechen, Mord, Folter und willkรผrliche Verhaftungen wรคhrend des fast 14-jรคhrigen Bรผrgerkriegs. Das historische Urteil verurteilt auch seinen Bruder Maher al-Assad und fรผnf weitere ehemalige Militรคr- und Sicherheitsbeamte zum Tode.



Das Urteil

Am 11. August 2026 verkรผndete Richter Fakhr al-Din al-Aryan des Vierten Strafgerichts in Damaskus das historische Urteil. Das Gericht befand Assad fรผr schuldig der “vorsรคtzlichen und absichtlichen Tรถtung mehrerer Personen und von Kindern, Folter, willkรผrlicher Verhaftung und Verbrechen gegen die Menschlichkeit”.

Der Prozess dauerte fast vier Monate. Assad, der nach dem Sturz seines Regimes im Dezember 2024 nach Russland geflohen war, wurde zusammen mit den meisten anderen Angeklagten in Abwesenheit verhandelt. Der einzige Angeklagte, der persรถnlich vor Gericht erschien, war Atef Nadschib, Assads Cousin und ehemaliger Sicherheitschef in der Provinz Daraa, der Anfang 2025 verhaftet wurde und in einem Kรคfig in einer Gefรคngnisuniform vor Gericht stand.

Zusรคtzlich zu Assad und Nadschib verurteilte das Gericht:

ยท Maher al-Assad โ€“ Baschars jรผngerer Bruder und Kommandeur der gefรผrchteten Vierten Panzerdivision โ€“ in Abwesenheit zum Tode
ยท Fahd al-Freij โ€“ ehemaliger Verteidigungsminister โ€“ in Abwesenheit zum Tode
ยท Vier weitere namentlich nicht genannte ehemalige Militรคr- und Sicherheitsbeamte



Die Verbrechen

Die Anklage geht auf Assads brutale Niederschlagung der prodemokratischen Proteste von 2011 zurรผck, die sich zu einem Bรผrgerkrieg ausweitete, der Hunderttausende Syrer das Leben kostete.

Das Gericht stellte fest, dass Assad als “hรถchster Entscheidungstrรคger” die direkte Verantwortung dafรผr trug, dass staatliche Institutionen systematische Menschenrechtsverletzungen begingen. Sein Bruder Maher fรผhrte die Vierte Division an, die die Niederschlagung der Proteste anfรผhrte, Territorium zurรผckeroberte und beschuldigt wurde, ein Drogenhandelsnetzwerk zur Bereicherung des Regimes betrieben zu haben.

Atef Nadschib, der ehemalige Chef der politischen Sicherheit in Daraa, wurde wegen seiner Rolle bei der Folter von 15 Jugendlichen im Jahr 2011 verurteilt, die anti-Assad-Parolen gesprรผht hatten โ€“ ein Ereignis, das weithin als der Funke gilt, der den landesweiten Aufstand entzรผndete.



Reaktionen in Syrien: “Die Freude ist unbeschreiblich”

Als die Nachricht vom Urteil bekannt wurde, versammelten sich Menschenmengen vor dem Gerichtsgebรคude in Damaskus, skandierten, applaudierten und schwenkten syrische Flaggen. Auch in Daraa, dem Geburtsort der Revolution, brachen Feierlichkeiten aus.

“Die Freude ist unbeschreiblich. So Gott will, werden wir Baschar al-Assad und alle seine Helfer am Galgen hรคngen sehen.” โ€“ Ein Mann in Damaskus, der ein Foto seines verstorbenen Vaters hielt.

Nouha al-Masri, eine Staatsanwรคltin in dem Fall, die ihren Bruder bei dem Massaker von Daraa 2011 verlor, sagte der BBC:

“Wir haben 15 Jahre darauf gewartet, auch nur einen kleinen Teil unserer Rechte zurรผckzuerlangenโ€ฆ Im neuen Syrien wird es von diesem Tag an keine Straflosigkeit mehr geben.”



Die neue Regierung: Vom Terroristen zum Prรคsidenten

Das Gericht, das Assad verurteilte, tagt in einem Syrien, das einen radikalen Wandel durchgemacht hat. Das Regime, das im Dezember 2024 fiel, wurde von einer Koalition von Rebellenkrรคften unter Fรผhrung der Hay’at Tahrir al-Scham (HTS) gestรผrzt โ€“ einer Gruppe mit tiefen Wurzeln in Al-Qaida, die von den USA, GroรŸbritannien und der EU immer noch als terroristische Organisation eingestuft wird.

Der Mann, der heute Syrien regiert, ist Ahmed al-Scharaa, frรผher bekannt als Abu Mohammad al-Dscholani. Vor wenigen Jahren war er einer der meistgesuchten Terroristen der Welt mit einer US-Kopfgeld von 10 Millionen Dollar. Die USA hatten ihn 2013 als “speziell ausgewiesenen globalen Terroristen” eingestuft, und das FBI unterhielt noch bis 2017 ein Programm, das 10 Millionen Dollar fรผr Informationen zu seiner Ergreifung aussetzte.

Im Januar 2025 wurde al-Scharaa zum syrischen รœbergangsprรคsidenten ernannt. Im Mรคrz trat eine vorlรคufige Verfassungserklรคrung in Kraft, und unter der Fรผhrung der HTS wurde eine neue Regierung gebildet. Al-Scharaa hat seitdem ein 210-kรถpfiges Parlament ernannt, wobei 70 Abgeordnete direkt von ihm bestimmt wurden, und hat die Exekutivgewalt konsolidiert, wรคhrend er ein ausgedehntes Patronagenetzwerk betreibt.

Die Ironie ist frappierend: Ein Mann, der einst von den USA als Terrorist gejagt wurde, trifft sich heute mit amerikanischen Beamten. Im November 2025 besuchte al-Scharaa das WeiรŸe Haus, wo Prรคsident Trump ihn empfing. US-Beamte haben direkte Kontakte mit der HTS eingerรคumt und zwar al-Scharaas willkommene ร„uรŸerungen zum Schutz von Minderheiten- und Frauenrechten zur Kenntnis genommen, bleiben jedoch skeptisch, was seine langfristigen Absichten betrifft. Die US-Botschaft in Syrien hat unterdessen die “WANTED”-Mitteilung fรผr den Mann, fรผr dessen Ergreifung sie einst 10 Millionen Dollar ausgesetzt hatte, nicht entfernt.

Auch GroรŸbritannien รคchtet die HTS weiterhin, wรคhrend die EU Finanzsanktionen gegen al-Dscholani aufrechterhรคlt. Die neue syrische Fรผhrung existiert somit in einem diplomatischen Schwebezustand: international als De-facto-Regierung anerkannt, jedoch von Personen gefรผhrt, die von denselben Mรคchten, die nun mit ihnen verhandeln, immer noch als Terroristen eingestuft werden.



Symbolische Gerechtigkeit oder praktische Sackgasse?

Das Urteil ist zwar ein mรคchtiges Symbol fรผr die รœbergangsjustiz, seine praktische Wirkung ist jedoch begrenzt. Assad und sein Bruder bleiben in Moskau, wo ihnen aus humanitรคren Grรผnden Asyl gewรคhrt wurde. Russland hat bisher Auslieferungsersuchen abgelehnt.

Menschenrechtsaktivisten warnen, dass das Todesurteil jede kรผnftige Auslieferung erschweren kรถnnte, da Lรคnder in der Regel keine Verdรคchtigen an Staaten ausliefern, in denen ihnen die Hinrichtung droht. Die neuen syrischen Behรถrden haben angekรผndigt, “internationale Rechtswege” zu verfolgen, um die beiden Mรคnner zu verfolgen.



Ein neues Kapitel fรผr Syrien

Der Prozess ist Teil der umfassenderen Bemรผhungen der syrischen รœbergangsregierung, mit dem jahrzehntelangen Erbe der Unterdrรผckung durch die Assad-Dynastie zu brechen. Seit dem Sturz des Regimes im Dezember 2024 haben die Behรถrden zahlreiche ehemalige Beamte inhaftiert und Ermittlungen zu Grรคueltaten eingeleitet.

Das Urteil wurde von den Staatsanwรคlten als “so groรŸ wie die Opfer, die die Syrer 15 Jahre lang gebracht haben” bezeichnet. Fรผr viele ist es ein erster Schritt zur Rechenschaft โ€“ selbst wenn der frรผhere Diktator selbst unerreichbar bleibt.

Die Frage, wer nun in Syrien die Macht innehat, bleibt fรผr die internationale Gemeinschaft zutiefst unbequem. Der Mann, der den Befehl zur Verurteilung Assads unterzeichnete, ist selbst ein ehemaliger Al-Qaida-Kommandeur, der von vielen der gleichen Nationen, die das Urteil bejubeln, immer noch gesucht wird. In Syrien wird Gerechtigkeit fรผr Assads Opfer von einer Regierung verlangt, die bis vor kurzem selbst als terroristische Organisation galt. Der Widerspruch kรถnnte nicht grรถรŸer sein.



๐Ÿ“บ YouTube: youtube.com/@bernd_pulch
๐Ÿฆ X (Twitter): x.com/berndsocial1
๐Ÿ“ข Telegram: t.me/ABOVETOPSECRETXXL
๐Ÿ”“ UNLOCK THE TRUTH: berndpulch.org/join

The Secret Memo That Accused Bush of War Crimes (They Tried to Destroy It)


“This Is a War Crime”: The Secret Memo That Warned Bush His CIA Was Breaking the Lawโ€”And How They Made It Disappear

EXCLUSIVE: TOP SECRET Zelikow Memo Reveals White House Knew Torture Was Illegal, Ordered Evidence Destroyed

Support independent investigative journalism: patreon.com/berndpulch


The Memo They Tried to Burn

In February 2006, a senior Bush administration official sat down and wrote something extraordinary: a TOP SECRET memorandum warning that the CIA’s “enhanced interrogation” program was a breach of U.S. war crimes law. The author was Philip Zelikow, counselor to Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice and a respected historian who would later lead the 9/11 Commission.

His audience: the National Security Council’s Principals Committeeโ€”the most powerful national security body in the U.S. government, including the Vice President, Secretary of Defense, CIA Director, and Attorney General.

His conclusion: The CIA’s physical abuse of detainees was illegal. Period.

The Bush administration’s response? They rejected his legal analysisโ€”and ordered every copy of the memo destroyed.

But one draft survived. Hidden in State Department files, it was declassified in 2012. What it reveals is a story of conscience, cover-up, and the bureaucratic archaeology of crimes.

Support our work and access exclusive documents: patreon.com/berndpulch


The Legal Warning That Couldn’t Be Allowed to Exist

Zelikow’s February 15, 2006 memo arrived at a critical moment. The CIA’s torture programโ€”waterboarding, sleep deprivation, stress positions, and “walling” (slamming detainees against walls)โ€”was under internal strain. The 2005 Detainee Treatment Act had just passed, and the Supreme Court’s Hamdan v. Rumsfeld decision had thrown the legal basis for military commissions into question.

Zelikow, a former prosecutor and law professor, saw what others in the administration refused to acknowledge: The CIA’s methods weren’t just morally wrongโ€”they were legally indefensible.

His memo argued that:

  • The Geneva Conventions’ Common Article 3โ€”which prohibits “cruel treatment and torture” and “outrages upon personal dignity”โ€”applied to all CIA detainees
  • The War Crimes Act of 1996 made violations of Common Article 3 a federal felony punishable by up to life imprisonment
  • The CIA’s “enhanced interrogation techniques” likely constituted “cruel treatment” under international law
  • No presidential authorization could legalize war crimes

This was heresy in Cheney’s Washington.

Join our Patreon for early access to classified document analysis: patreon.com/berndpulch


The Destruction Order

According to multiple reports, the Bush White Houseโ€”particularly Vice President Dick Cheney’s office and the CIAโ€”reacted to Zelikow’s memo with fury. Here was a senior administration official, cleared at the highest levels, declaring that the President’s signature interrogation program made everyone involved criminally liable.

The response wasn’t debate. It wasn’t legal review. It was erasure.

The administration ordered all copies of Zelikow’s memo destroyed. Officials were directed to retrieve and eliminate every version from State Department, CIA, and White House files. The goal: to ensure no prosecutor, no court, no congressional investigator could ever prove that the White House had been explicitly warned its torture program was illegal.

One copy survived. A draft remained in State Department archives, overlooked in the purge. It sat there for six years until declassification in 2012, finally entering the public record for the world to see.

Help us uncover more suppressed documents: patreon.com/berndpulch


Why This Memo Matters More Than Ever

Proof of Consciousness of Guilt

The destruction order is the smoking gun. In criminal law, consciousness of guiltโ€”taking steps to hide evidenceโ€”demonstrates awareness of wrongdoing. Ordering the destruction of a legal memo warning of war crimes isn’t “policy disagreement.” It’s cover-up of crimes.

The Torture Architects Knew

Zelikow sent his memo to the Principals Committeeโ€”meaning Cheney, Rumsfeld, CIA Director Porter Goss, Attorney General Alberto Gonzales, and Condoleezza Rice all received explicit warning that the CIA program violated U.S. war crimes law. They chose to continue the program and destroy the warning.

Obama’s Failure to Prosecute

When the Zelikow memo was declassified in 2012, it provided prima facie evidence that senior Bush officials knowingly authorized torture despite legal warnings. The Obama administration, which had promised to “look forward, not backward,” declined to prosecute. The memo became a historical document rather than evidence in a criminal case.

Precedent for Impunity

The Zelikow memo’s suppression established a template: Classify legal warnings. Destroy inconvenient documents. Declare “national security.” This patternโ€”seen in the CIA torture tapes destruction (2005), the NSA warrantless surveillance cover-ups, and the Abu Ghraib accountability failuresโ€”has eroded the rule of law in national security policy.

Patreon supporters get exclusive access to our full archive: patreon.com/berndpulch


What the Memo Actually Said

While the full text remains partially redacted, Zelikow’s core argument was devastating in its simplicity:

The Geneva Conventions apply. The War Crimes Act applies. The CIA’s methods violate both. Therefore, U.S. officials are committing federal felonies.

Zelikow specifically addressed the administration’s favorite legal escape hatchโ€”the claim that “enhanced interrogation” wasn’t torture because it didn’t cause “severe physical or mental pain” lasting months or years. He countered that Common Article 3’s prohibition on “cruel treatment” had a lower threshold and clearly covered waterboarding, stress positions, and sleep deprivation.

He also demolished the “necessity” defenseโ€”the argument that torture was justified to prevent terrorist attacks. Under the War Crimes Act, Zelikow noted, necessity is no defense for violations of Common Article 3.


The Man Who Wrote It

Philip Zelikow is no radical. He’s a Republican, a former Navy officer, a Harvard Law graduate, and the executive director of the 9/11 Commissionโ€”hardly a profile in anti-government activism. His memo was the product of a conservative national security professional doing his job: telling the truth about the law.

After the memo’s existence became public, Zelikow confirmed its contents and described the administration’s reaction. He noted that his legal analysis was “not welcome” and that senior officials made clear that only the Office of Legal Counsel’s pro-torture memosโ€”authored by John Yoo and Jay Bybeeโ€”were to be considered valid.

The Yoo-Bybee memos, later withdrawn by the Obama Justice Department as legally defective, had authorized torture by redefining it out of existence. Zelikow’s memo, which accurately interpreted the law, was suppressed because it was correct.

Support our investigative team: patreon.com/berndpulch


Conclusion: The Crime That Outlived Its Cover-Up

The Bush administration’s torture program ended in 2009. The Zelikow memo was declassified in 2012. No one has been prosecuted for the torture itself, or for the destruction of evidence warning about it.

But the memo endures. It sits in the public record, accessible to anyone who seeks it, proving that someone in power knew and tried to stop it. It proves that the destruction order was an admission of guilt. And it proves that the legal warnings were accurateโ€”the CIA’s interrogation program was a war crime under U.S. law.

The question remains: If a TOP SECRET memo warning of war crimes can be ordered destroyed, and no one is held accountable, what else has been burned?


Become a Patreon supporter to access our full archive of declassified documents and exclusive analysis: patreon.com/berndpulch


This article is based on declassified government documents and investigative reporting. The allegations contained in the Zelikow memo were contested by the Bush administration at the time.

“We Killed 100,000”: Leaked UN Report Exposes Rwanda’s President as War Criminal


TOP SECRET Report Implicates Rwanda’s President in War Crimes: The Leaked Special Investigations Summary

DocumentCloud Publication Reveals Secret UN Investigation into RPF Atrocities

Published on DocumentCloud | Originally marked: TOP SECRET


Overview

A highly classified document recently published on DocumentCloud titled “TOP SECRET Special Investigations Summary Report of RPF Crimes, With Targets” has brought renewed attention to one of the most sensitive investigations in modern African history. The report contains evidence from secret United Nations investigations into war crimes allegedly committed by the Rwanda Patriotic Front (RPF)โ€”the rebel movement that stopped the 1994 genocide against Tutsis but stands accused of committing its own atrocities against Hutu civilians during and after the conflict.


What is the RPF?

The Rwanda Patriotic Front (RPF) was a rebel army formed by Tutsi refugees who had been exiled from Rwanda for decades. In 1990, the RPF invaded Rwanda from Uganda, sparking a civil war that culminated in the 1994 genocide. When the genocide began in April 1994, the RPF resumed its offensive and defeated the Hutu-led government by July 1994, effectively stopping the genocide against Tutsis.

However, victory came with allegations of serious crimes. The RPF, now transformed into Rwanda’s ruling party with Paul Kagame as president, has faced persistent accusations that its soldiers committed massacres of Hutu civilians during their advance and in the years following their takeover.


The Secret Investigation

According to former International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR) Prosecutor Carla Del Ponte, the UN opened a “secret” investigation into RPF crimes as early as 2000. In her book “The Hunt: Me and My War Criminals,” Del Ponte revealed that her office collected evidence on 13 episodes in 1994 where RPF members allegedly massacred civilians as their troops advanced through Rwanda .

The investigation faced enormous obstacles:

  • Rwandan authorities reportedly controlled every stage of the investigation
  • The Rwandan intelligence service had received monitoring equipment from the United States, allowing them to intercept phone calls, faxes, and internet communications
  • There were suspicions that Rwandan agents had infiltrated the UN’s computer network and placed operatives among interpreters and team members in Kigali

On December 9, 2000, Del Ponte personally informed President Kagame that the prosecutor’s office had opened a case against him concerning allegations of war crimes committed by the RPF. According to Del Ponte, Kagame neither approved nor denied that these incidents had taken place .


What the TOP SECRET Report Contains

While the full contents of the DocumentCloud publication remain classified, investigative reports from Black Agenda Report and Mail & Guardian have revealed shocking testimony from former RPF soldiers included in UN investigative files :

Methods of Killing

Investigators documented brutal methods used by RPF soldiers:

  • Strangulation with cords
  • Smothering with plastic bags
  • Pouring burning plastic on victims’ skin
  • Hacking with hoes and bayonets
  • Mass graves and burning bodies

Scale of Atrocities

One RPF soldier who served in the northwestern region near Ruhengeri testified that his unit’s purpose was to “kill the enemy and bury or burn their corpses.” The soldier claimed his unit alone may have killed up to 100,000 people, averaging 150-200 people per day .

The soldier stated: “The goal of our group was to kill Hutus. That included women and childrenโ€ฆ People were killed with a cord [around their neck], a plastic bag [over their head], a hammer, a knife, or with traditional weapons [machete, panga].”

Systematic Ethnic Cleansing

Multiple former soldiers testified that as soon as the RPF seized an areaโ€”referred to as a “liberated zone”โ€”Hutus living there were systematically slaughtered. One soldier explained: “The [RPF] was convinced that Hutus were uncontrollable, so it was better to get rid of them. That’s why a systematic ethnic cleansing was organised in these ‘liberated zones’.”

Tactics included:

  • Organizing murderous attacks where hundreds of Hutu peasants were killed
  • Spreading rumors about imminent attacks to cause peasants to flee
  • Attacking before the genocide in northern Rwanda in 1993

The Gersony Report Connection

The allegations in this TOP SECRET report echo findings from the infamous Gersony Reportโ€”a UN investigation led by American consultant Robert Gersony in 1994. Gersony was tasked with developing a strategy for refugee return but instead discovered evidence of systematic RPF killings of Hutu civilians.

The report concluded that the RPF had organized systematic killings of Hutus in retaliation for the genocide against Tutsis and suggested these killings could amount to genocide . However, the Gersony Report was never officially published by the UN, and its existence was initially deniedโ€”though its authenticity is now beyond doubt.


Why This Matters Today

Justice Denied?

Despite the extensive evidence collected by UN investigators, no senior RPF official has ever been prosecuted by the ICTR for crimes committed in 1994. The tribunal’s mandate was limited to prosecuting genocide and crimes against humanity committed during the genocide, effectively shielding the RPF from accountability for crimes committed during their military campaign.

Kagame’s International Standing

President Paul Kagame remains a celebrated figure in international circles, praised for Rwanda’s economic development and women’s rights advances. However, this TOP SECRET report and related investigations suggest a more complex legacyโ€”one that includes credible allegations of war crimes and crimes against humanity that have never been fully investigated or prosecuted.

The Cost of Impunity

Human rights organizations have long argued that the failure to hold the RPF accountable has contributed to ongoing instability in the Great Lakes region. The RPF’s alleged crimes in Rwanda were followed by military interventions in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), where Rwandan forces have been accused of committing further atrocities and exploiting the country’s mineral resources.


Document Significance

The publication of this TOP SECRET Special Investigations Summary Report on DocumentCloud represents a critical piece of historical evidence. It demonstrates:

  1. The UN knew about RPF crimes but was politically constrained from acting
  2. Evidence was systematically collected but never led to prosecutions
  3. Witnesses came forward at great personal risk to testify about atrocities
  4. The international community chose stability over accountability in post-genocide Rwanda

Conclusion

The TOP SECRET report on DocumentCloud serves as a stark reminder that in the aftermath of the 1994 Rwandan genocideโ€”a crime that killed approximately 800,000 Tutsis and moderate Hutus in 100 daysโ€”the victors were not innocent. The RPF’s role in stopping the genocide has rightfully earned them a place in history, but the allegations contained in this secret investigation suggest that their campaign was accompanied by atrocities that demand acknowledgment and accountability.

As one former RPF soldier testified: “We killed many people, maybe 100,000.” Whether these numbers are accurate, and whether justice will ever be served for these crimes, remains one of the most troubling unanswered questions of the Rwandan genocide and its aftermath.



This article is based on investigative reporting and publicly available documents. The allegations contained in the TOP SECRET report remain contested by the Rwandan government.

Bernd Pulch (M.A.) is a forensic expert, founder of Aristotle AI, entrepreneur, political commentator, satirist, and investigative journalist covering lawfare, media control, investment, real estate, and geopolitics. His work examines how legal systems are weaponized, how capital flows shape policy, how artificial intelligence concentrates power, and what democracy loses when courts and markets become battlefields.

Full bio โ†’

Support the investigation โ†’

War Crimes in Ukraine – Congress Original Document – Follow โœŒ๏ธ@abovetopsecretxxl

Read all at

https://t.me/ABOVETOPSECRETXXL/30885

World War 3 threat: Hawaii ‘prepares for North Korea nuclear attack’

Become a Patron!
True Information is the most valuable resource and we ask you to give back.

Authorities held a secret meeting last week to discuss contingency plans in the event of Pyongyang launching a deadly missile at the US islands.

North Korean dictator Kim Jong-un has threatened to drop a hydrogen bomb over the Pacific Ocean amid fears Pyongyang has developed a nuclear missile capable of reaching Hawaii.

A document shared at the private talks, and obtained by local paper Honolulu Civil Beat, featured chapter headings such as “Enhance missile launch notification process between U.S. Pacific Command and the State Warning Point.โ€

The US state, in the middle of the Pacific Ocean, will also begin testing a warning siren system in November, giving residents between 12 and 15 minutes to take refuge.

Resident wil then be advised to stay indoors for 72 hours after an attack.

State representative Gene Ward told the Washington Post: “Now itโ€™s time to take it seriously.”

He said the plan was “not to be an alarmist but to be informing people.โ€

Mr Ward said the meeting last week was held in private because officials did not want to worry residents.

He also said talk of bunkers and fallout shelters was “probably more surreal for younger generations” with no experience of a realistic nuclear threat.

But Hawaiians are apparently taking the news in their stride, and carrying on with their daily lives.

Residents are used to disaster warnings, living in an area prone to hurricanes and tsunamis.

Survival guidelines for those scenarios are similar to the ones being issued for a nuclear attack – instead of seven days worth of food, water and medical supplies, residents are advised to double it.

The document distrubted at last week’s meeting suggested that around 90 per cent of the Hawaiian population would survive a nuclear attack by North Korea, based on the estimated yield of North Korea’s missile capability, which suggests an explosion less than eight miles in diameter.

It comes as America’s top military officer said despite an escalation in rhetoric between the US and North Korea, he had not seen Pyongyang change it’s military posture.

Marine General Joseph Dunford, chairman of the military’s Joint Chiefs of Staff, told a Senate Armed Services Committee hearing for his reappointment: “While the political space is clearly very charged right now, we haven’t seen a change in the posture of North Korean forces and we watch that very closely.

“What we haven’t seen is military activity that would be reflective of the charged political environment.”

North Korea has boosted defences on its east coast, a South Korean lawmaker said on Tuesday, after Pyongyang said US President Donald Trump had declared war and that it would shoot down US bombers flying near the peninsula.

Tensions have escalated since reclusive North Korea conducted its sixth and most powerful nuclear test on Sept. 3. Bellicose rhetoric has reached a new level in recent days with leaders on both sides exchanging threats and insults.

North Korean Foreign Minister Ri Yong Ho said on Monday that Mr Trump’s Twitter comments that leader Kim Jong Un and Ri “won’t be around much longer” if they acted on their threats amounted to a declaration of war and that Pyongyang had the right to take countermeasures.

โ† Back

Thank you for your response. โœจ

Unveiled – Venezuela prepares for war with U.S. with โ€˜rifles, missiles and well-oiled tanks at the readyโ€™

Become a Patron!
True Information is the most valuable resource and we ask you to give back.

Venezuela’s President Nicolas Maduro called on his nation’s military leaders Tuesday to prepare for war against the U.S. days after the Trump administration banned Venezuelan officials from entering the nation.

“We have been shamelessly threatened by the most criminal empire that ever existed and we have the obligation to prepare ourselves to guarantee peace,” said Maduro, who wore a green uniform and a military hat as he spoke with his army top brass during a military exercise involving tanks and missiles. “We need to have rifles, missiles and well-oiled tanks at the ready….to defend every inch of the territory if needs be,” he added.

The Trump administration has taken a hard stance against Maduro’s regime by banning money lending to Venezuela’s government or its state oil company PDVSA, and passing sanctions against Maduro and his top officials.

Maduro referenced the sanctions during his speech at the military base. As he spoke, Russian military plans flew in the sky as part of the training exercise, Agence France-Presse reported.

“The future of humanity cannot be the world of illegal sanctions, of economic persecution,” Maduro said.

It’s unlikely Maduro has the manpower to stand up to the U.S., which has a much larger military. Maduro has maintained power in Venezuela despite mounting political and economic crises that has seen months of violent, anti-government demonstrations across the South American nation. Defense Minister Vladimir Padrino has backed Maduro during the upheaval, but some critics have begun a whisper campaign suggesting that the military could break away and support a coup against the president, Herbert Garcia, a former senior army general and minister, told Reuters in August. There have been three attempted military coups in Venezuela since 1992.

Russia has defended Maduro in recent months, going so far as to accuse Trump of preparing for an invasion of Caracas. “We are strongly against unilateral sanctions against sovereign states,” Russian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Maria Zakharova said in August. “We will carefully analyze the implications of the sanctions imposed by the United States, and their possible effect on the interests of Russia and Russian businesses. We can already say that they will not affect our willingness to expand and strengthen cooperation with the friendly nation of Venezuela and its people.”

President Donald Trump directed his penchant for insulting world leaders toward Venezuela during a United Nations speech earlier this month. He said Washington could intervene in Venezuela to help its citizens “recover their country”

โ€œWe cannot stand by and watch,โ€ he said.

Maduro oversaw a disputed election earlier this year to muzzle the elected national assembly by creating “constituent assembly” in its place.

โ† Back

Thank you for your response. โœจ

Movie – Dirty Wars – Documentary Excerpt

Dirty Wars follows investigative reporter Jeremy Scahill, author of the international bestseller “Blackwater,” into the heart of America’s covert wars, from Afghanistan to Yemen, Somalia and beyond.

Part political thriller and part detective story, Dirty Wars is a global investigation of the secretive and powerful Joint Special Operations Command (JSOC).

In this excerpt, Scahill travels with a self-proclaimed general who was once an enemy of the US but is now on the Americans’ payroll.

For more information visit:
http://www.dirtywars.org

For more great stories, subscribe to The I Files:ย http://goo.gl/0Bc68

JOIN THE CONVERSATION ONLINE:
Like The I Files on Facebook:ย http://fb.com/theifiles
Follow on Twitter:ย http://twitter.com/ifiles
Reblog on Tumblr:ย http://theifiles.tumblr.com
Repin on Pinterest:ย http://pinterest.com/theifiles
+1 on Google+:ย http://gplus.to/ifiles