Topless members of the Femen radical feminist group seized the Euro 2012 football trophy on display in Ukraine to protest against the increase of sex tourism in the former Soviet republic.
Topless members of the Femen radical feminist group seized the Euro 2012 football trophy on display in Ukraine to protest against the increase of sex tourism in the former Soviet republic.
DOWNLOAD THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT HERE
DOWNLOAD THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT HERE
Gangland tells the inside stories of some of America’s most notorious street gangs.
DOWNLOAD THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT HERE
28 May 2012
TEPCO video of the 26 May 2012 tour shown below:http://photo.tepco.co.jp/en/date/2012/201205-e/120526-01e.html
TEPCO high-resolution photos of the tour:
http://photo.tepco.co.jp/en/date/2012/201205-e/120528_01e.html
http://photo.tepco.co.jp/en/date/2012/201205-e/120528-02e.html
27 May 2012
Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station 26 May 2012
These photos are reduced to half-size of the originals. The 16 full-size originals:
http://cryptome.org/2012-info/daiichi-12-0526/daiichi-12-0526.zip (18.4MB)
TEPCO report on structural stability of Unit 4, 25 May 2012:
http://www.tepco.co.jp/en/nu/fukushima-np/images/handouts_120525_05-e.pdf
![[Image]](https://i0.wp.com/cryptome.org/2012-info/daiichi-12-0526/pict19.jpg)
Cryptome Nuclear Power Plant and WMD series: http://cryptome.org/nppw-series.htm
|
Media persons and Tokyo Electric Power Co. employees look at the company’s tsunami-crippled Fukushima Dai-Ichi nuclear power plant during a press tour in Okuma town, Fukushima prefecture, Japan, Saturday, May 26, 2012. (Tomohiro Ohsumi, Pool) |
Reactor buildings from left to right, the No. 1, the No. 2, the No. 3 and the No. 4, are seen during a press tour at Tokyo Electric Power Co.’s (TEPCO) Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant in Okuma, Fukushima prefecture, Japan, Saturday, May 26, 2012. (Tomohiro Ohsumi, Pool) |
Members of the media and Tokyo Electric Power Co. employees walk in front of the No. 4 reactor building, rear, crippled by the March 11 earthquake and tsunami, at the utility company’s Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant in Okuma, Fukushima prefecture, Japan, Saturday, May 26, 2012. (Tomohiro Ohsumi, Pool) |
The damaged No. 4 reactor building stands at Tokyo Electric Power Co.’s Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant in Okuma, Fukushima prefecture, Japan, Saturday, May 26, 2012. Japanese Environment and Nuclear Minister Goshi Hosono, accompanied by the media, has visited the crippled Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant to inspect a reactor building and its spent fuel pool at the center of safety concerns. (Tomohiro Ohsumi, Pool) |
Goshi Hosono, Japan’s environment and nuclear minister, third from left, wearing a red helmet, along with members of the media, walks on the No. 4 reactor building at Tokyo Electric Power Co.’s (TEPCO) Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant in Okuma, Fukushima prefecture, Japan, Saturday, May 26, 2012. Japan’s environment and nuclear minister Hosono visited the tsunami-crippled nuclear power plant Saturday to inspect a spent fuel pool at the center of safety concerns. (Tomohiro Ohsumi, Pool) |
Goshi Hosono, Japan’s environment and nuclear minister, inspects the No. 4 reactor building at Tokyo Electric Power Co.’s Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant in Okuma, Fukushima Prefecture, Japan, Saturday, May 26, 2012. The visit by Hosono, apparently aimed at demonstrating the safety of the facility, came amid renewed concerns about conditions at the plant’s No. 4 reactor after its operator reported a bulging of the building’s wall. (Toshiaki Shimizu, Japan Pool) [Yellow reactor containment dome at center background.] |
Workers walk in front of the No. 4 reactor building at Tokyo Electric Power Co.’s tsunami-crippled Fukushima Dai-Ichi nuclear power plant in Okuma town, Fukushima prefecture, Japan, Saturday, May 26, 2012. (Tomohiro Ohsumi, Pool) |
An inside view of the damaged No. 4 reactor building is seen at Tokyo Electric Power Co.’s tsunami-crippled Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant in Okuma, Fukushima prefecture, Japan, Saturday, May 26, 2012. (Toshiaki Shimizu, Japan Pool) |
The inside of the tsunami-crippled No. 4 reactor building is seen during a press tour at Tokyo Electric Power Co.’s (TEPCO) Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant in Okuma, Fukushima Prefecture, Japan, Saturday, May 26, 2012.(Toshiaki Shimizu, Japan Pool) |
Japan’s Environment and Nuclear Minister Goshi Hosono, second from left, inspects a pool containing spent fuel rods inside the No. 4 reactor building at Tokyo Electric Power Co. ‘s tsunami-crippled Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant in Okuma, Fukushima Prefecture, Japan, Saturday, May 26, 2012. The pool, located at the top of the building above the reactor, remains one of the plant’s biggest risks due to its vulnerability to earthquakes. (Toshiaki Shimizu, Japan Pool) |
A pool for spent fuel rods is seen inside the No. 4 reactor building of Tokyo Electric Power Co.’s tsunami-crippled Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant in Okuma, Fukushima prefecture, Japan, Saturday, May 26, 2012. The pool, located at the top of the building above the reactor, remains one of the plant’s biggest risks due to its vulnerability to earthquakes. (Toshiaki Shimizu, Japan Pool) |
The No. 3 reactor building is seen at Tokyo Electric Power Co.’s (TEPCO) Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant in Okuma, Fukushima prefecture, Japan, Saturday, May 26, 2012. Japan’s environment and nuclear minister, accompanied by the media, visited the tsunami-crippled nuclear power plant Saturday to inspect a spent fuel pool at the center of safety concerns. (Tomohiro Ohsumi, Pool) |
The No. 1, left, and the No. 2, reactor buildings are seen during a press tour at the tsunami-crippled Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant of Tokyo Electric Power Co. (TEPCO) in Okuma, Fukushima Prefecture, Japan, Saturday, May 26, 2012. (Tomohiro Ohsumi, Pool) |
Workers carry out radiation screening on a bus for a media tour at Tokyo Electric Power Co. (TEPCO) ‘s Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant in Okuma, Fukushima prefecture, Japan, on Saturday, May 26, 2012. Japan’s environment and nuclear minister, accompanied by the media, visited the tsunami-crippled nuclear power plant Saturday to inspect a spent fuel pool at the center of safety concerns. (Tomohiro Ohsumi, Pool) |
A worker carries out radiation screening on a bus for a media tour at Tokyo Electric Power Co. (TEPCO) ‘s Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant in Okuma, Fukushima prefecture, Japan, on Saturday, May 26, 2012. (Tomohiro Ohsumi, Pool) |
A worker walks through the building used as crisis management headquarters at the tsunami-crippled Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant of Tokyo Electric Power Co.’s (TEPCO) in Okuma, Fukushima prefecture, Japan, Saturday, May 26, 2012. (Tomohiro Ohsumi, Pool) |
DOWNLOAD THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT HERE

Executive Overview
(U) Major social events such as the World Cup, Super Bowl, and Olympics have typically drawn the interest of cyber criminals and hacktivists. Open source reporting indicated that China was subjected to approximately 12 million online attacks per day during the 2008 Summer Olympics in Beijing. Two months after the closing ceremony for the 2008 Games, cyber criminals began launching campaigns using 2012 London Summer Olympic themes. Reporting last year indicates some groups are also preparing attacks linked to the 2014 Winter Games in Sochi, Russia.
(U) Scams, malware campaigns and attacks will continue to grow in scale and complexity as the 27 July opening ceremony in London draws near. Event organizers, sponsors and British authorities continue to increase their physical and cybersecurity awareness as the event approaches. Information systems supporting the Games, transport infrastructure, law enforcement communications, financial operations and similar will become prime targets for criminals. A collective of approximately eighty-seven UK banks exercised their ability to withstand cyber attacks last November. Olympic organizers anticipated cyber threats and began testing their cybersecurity posture during ‘technical rehearsals’ by running scenarios from their Technology Operations Center (TOC) situated on Canary Wharf. The TOC will be manned with over one hundred personnel continuously monitoring critical applications, such as the Commentator Information System, organizers’ intranet, and a telecom infrastructure encompassing 900 servers, 1,000 network and security devices, and 9,500 computers. In addition, British law enforcement organizations have been collaborating with the U.S. Secret Service and other industry experts to understand attack vectors, detection methods and mitigation strategies to combat the threat. However, the cyber implications are more expansive than localized attacks against systems and encompass globally distributed Olympic-themed malware, spam campaigns and scams.
(U) There are eleven global sponsors of the 2012 Olympic Games: Coca-Cola, Acer, Atos, Dow, General Electric, McDonalds, Omega, Panasonic, Proctor & Gamble, Samsung, and VISA. These sponsors include a variety of companies, some of which are Critical Infrastructure Key Resources (CIKR) or Information Sharing Analysis Center (ISAC) members. The actions or creditability of the sponsors may become targets for cyber criminals or hacktivists. The purpose of this bulletin is to provide a strategic outlook for the 2012 Summer Olympic Games and similar events to assist partners in detecting and mitigating related attacks.
…
Technical Details
(U) Disruption of Operations: Protestors could choose to disrupt the Games using cyber or physical means. Typical methods of cyber disruption include a denial of service (DOS) or distributed denial of service (DDOS) attack, which may be the result of a physical or cyber action, and causes an interruption of business operations against a network, website or other resources. With an IT staff of over five thousand (approximately half are volunteers), there is potential for insider attacks during the Olympics which could cause a DOS, this bulletin will focus on a DOS or DDOS achievable through technological means only. DDOS attacks are typically launched using a botnet and the ability to bring down a target depends on three variables:
(U) Attackers motivated by ideals are considered hacktivist and a wide spectrum of events may at as a flashpoint for their attacks. Criminals or hacktivists utilizing DDOS attacks or web defacements may be motivated by ideological or financial objectives. For example, in February, a group of Iranian hackers dubbed the “Cocain (sic) Warriors” took credit for defacing the official website of the National Olympic Committee of Azerbaijan and the website of Azerbaijan Airlines. The actors left an anti-Israeli political message about Azerbaijan and Israel’s recent increased cooperation and arms deal. Israel recently announced that it was selling $1.6 billion in arms to Azerbaijan, a move that upset both Armenia and Iran. The text of the defacement was political, with likely intentions to reach as broad an audience as possible and amplify the message by targeting an Olympics-related national-level website. The following are examples of things which may incite hacktivists to launch attacks during the Olympics:
(U) Information Theft: The second type of attack would have a goal of information theft. This information could be used to grant a competitive edge to a company, individual or other entity. This type of attack may be facilitated by an insider or a remote attacker exfiltrating data through a system compromise. Criminals seeking competitive advantage often use spearphishing to penetrate a network. Spearphishing is an email-based attack where tailored emails containing malicious attachments or links are sent to key personnel identified during reconnaissance operations. These emails are especially convincing because they appear to be sent from a legitimate source. The highly customized nature of spearphishing emails and employment of spoofed email addresses make it extremely difficult to mitigate at the email gateway. In addition, advanced attackers understand how to bypass email filters and antivirus software so that the payload can be delivered successfully. Adversaries may target Olympic personnel to gain access to engineering schematics, scoring technologies, competitor information, ticketing systems, or similar targets.
…
Future Outlook
(U) The 2014 Winter Olympics to be held in Sochi, Russia, have prompted (and will likely prompt more) attention to controversial issues and Russia’s role in the region. Sochi is located on the Black Sea and borders the North Caucasus region. The North Caucasus is part of the Russian Federation and is comprised of several smaller republics, many ethnic groups and a rich cultural legacy wracked by war, intermittent violence and competing claims to power. Legacies surrounding land claims and ethnic sovereignty issues in the Caucasus have been ongoing for centuries, and they continue to the current day with wars having occurred in the last few decades, particularly in the early 1990s in Chechnya and between Georgia and South Ossetia as recently as 2008. This demonstrates that political beliefs (or reactions to such speech) are often expressed via cyber means in the region.
(U) Pro-Olympic Cyber Attacks: The construction of the 2014 Olympics facilities near the UNESCO protected Caucasus Biosphere Reserve and Sochi National Park has drawn criticisms from global environmental groups, as well as local Sochi news organizations. These Sochi news portals came under attack in late 2010 because of their vocal opposition to the Olympic construction. It is unknown who perpetrated this series of attacks, but their choice of targets indicates the attacker was possibly attempting to subdue opposition.
(U) Hacktivism: Hacktivists (Anonymous Kavkaz) purporting to be part of the larger Anonymous collective vowed to attack MegaFon on May 21, 2012 as part of ‘Operation BlackHole’. MegaFon is Russia’s second largest mobile phone operator in Russia and one of the national sponsors for the 2014 Winter Olympics, to be held in Sochi, Russia. The Adiga actors expressed outrage about the location of the Olympics in Sochi, Russia, as they believe that the Olympic complex is being built upon mass graves from the Circassian genocide. The attack date is significant, as Circassians commemorate the Circassian-Russian War every year on May 21, the day that Circassia was annexed by the Russians and as a remembrance of the genocide that the Circassians believed occurred at the hands of the Russians.
(U) Anonymous Kavkaz (aka Adiga Hackers) started a Twitter feed on Feb. 25 and have only updated it twice, with just a handful of followers as of this writing. The true affiliation with the larger Anonymous group seems unlikely because:
(U) The group purports to have attacked and disabled (exact means unknown) the server of the Russian Commercial Bank (a subsidiary of another Russian bank, the VTB Bank) on March 29, 2012. According to a website monitoring service, the bank’s website was having problems, but it is unclear what the issues were or if they were related to the alleged attack.
(U) Politically motivated actors from this region vary in ability, but the Russian e-crime underground offers advanced capabilities that could be sought out by North Caucasus hacktivists. Similarly, the Adiga hackers could seek more skilled Anonymous-associated actors for assistance, but thus far they have not been observed communicating in known Anonymous communications channels. This could be good indication that they are only peripheral, aspirational actors. It is possible the Adiga hackers only adopted the Anonymous moniker in an attempt to gain legitimacy and anchor their somewhat obscure cause in the framework of a larger movement to attract more followers or participants.
(U) This is the first time Russia has hosted the Olympics (the 1980 Olympic Games were held in the USSR) and officials are actively monitoring the region for any indication of unrest. Russia has recently deployed military forces to the North Caucasus as part of a broader effort to stabilize the region in the lead-up to the 2014 Olympics.
(U) Although each host country will face unique challenges, the majority of cyber threats will remain consistent as officials begin preparations for the 2016 (Rio de Janeiro, Brazil) and 2018 (Pyeongchang, South Korea) Olympic Games. DHS and partners should continue to coordinate with impacted CIKR partners while promoting awareness campaigns to minimize malware infections.
DOWNLOAD THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT HERE
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gTEPCgLz8co
Incorporating never before-seen archival footage, home movies and interviews with family members, journalists and law enforcement officials, this tells the story of the twisted Robin Hood who founded the Medellin cartel cocaine smuggling organization and became the first billionaire criminal in South America.
Die Liste wurde bereits früher hier publiziert:
Vom “Stasiopfer”-Angebot führt ein Link zu einer Website in den USA (www.jya.com), die sich auch mit den Praktiken von Geheimdiensten beschäftigt. Dort findet sich die “Fipro-Liste”, das detaillierte “Finanzprojekt” der Stasi, angefertigt in den letzten Tagen der DDR, um die Rentenansprüche der rund 100 000 hauptamtlichen Mitarbeiter des MfS auch nach dem Zusammenbruch des Systems belegen zu können. Die “Fipro-Liste” ist seit langem bekannt und diente Anfang der neunziger Jahre etwa zur Identifizierung der so genannten OibE – Offiziere im besonderen Einsatz. Diese Liste „Offiziere im besonderen Einsatz“im Jahre 1991 erschien in der “taz. Die Echtheit kann beim BStU überprüft werden.
Siehe u.a. http://www.spiegel.de/spiegel/print/d-22539439.html
Auf Druck ehemaliger STASI-Leute und Ihrer Genossen wurde die Liste aus dem Verkehr gezogen.
Hier ist sie wieder:
090471423014;18;35;00;;BRA(E)CKLEIN, JO(E)RG:;;;2795,00
190435415322;13;00;41;K, 4232/86:;BRA(E)NDEL, LOTHAR;4090;GARTENSTADTSTR. 4;
190435415322;13;00;41;K, 4232/86:;BRA(E)NDEL, LOTHAR;4090;GARTENSTADTSTR. 4;
150359412122;07;00;59;;BRA(E)SE, UDO:;;;22080,00
060769426819;18;31;00;;BRA(E)UER, HOLM:;;;9510,00
031170413111;18;35;00;;BRA(E)UER, OLAF:;;;2795,00
060269415021;18;34;00;;BRA(E)UNER, JO(E)RG:;;;9675,00
160170408225;18;33;00;;BRA(E)UNIG, JO(E)RG:;;;9510,00
150569419728;18;31;00;;BRA(E)UNLICH, HEIKO:;;;9600,00
180470414836;18;33;00;;BRA(E)UNLICH, TOBIAS:;;;6958,87
060468418313;18;33;00;;BRA(E)UTIGAM, JENS:;;;9825,00
190768428922;18;31;00;;BRA(E)UTIGAM, MICHAEL:;;;9648,38
220269425027;18;33;00;;BRA(E)UTIGAM, SVEN:;;;9675,00
181270424938;18;32;00;;BRA(E)UTIGAM, UWE:;;;2795,00
130965400916;01;69;00;;BRAASCH, KARSTEN:;;;15898,50
091165402711;97;08;00;;BRAATZ, ANDREAS:;;;18179,00
260940403112;03;00;42;;BRAATZ, ECKHARD:;;;28080,00
261052505721;04;09;00;;BRAATZ, ELKE:;;;20160,00
151038402729;30;44;00;;BRAATZ, GUENTER:;;;15570,00
300333422120;12;40;00;;BRAATZ, RUDOLF:;;;38250,00
120270411521;07;06;00;;BRAATZ, THOMAS:;;;12460,00
150271422211;18;28;00;;BRAATZ, THOMAS:;;;2720,00
070365403716;97;08;00;;BRAATZ, UWE:;;;17682,50
100557430174;15;18;00;;BRABAND, CARSTEN:;;;22990,00
250255429737;15;02;00;;BRABAND, HENRY:;;;25080,00
111153529817;15;77;00;;BRABAND, ILONA:;;;0,00
241053428221;18;35;00;;BRABANDT, BERTHOLD:;;;25200,00
181252415376;13;80;00;;BRABANT, BERND:;;;20405,00
201239529710;97;01;00;;BRABANT, CHRISTA:;;;19575,00
080139416411;09;06;00;;BRABANT, HEINRICH:;;;19620,00
291037429764;98;20;00;;BRABANT, HEINZ:;;;30937,50
300449426334;99;99;99;::;BRABANT, JOACHIM;1140;MARCHWITZASTR. 3;
300449426334;99;99;99;::;BRABANT, JOACHIM;1140;MARCHWITZASTR. 3;
210357415401;99;02;00;;BRABANT, PETER:;;;23345,00
311261430095;94;65;00;;BRABANT, PETER:;;;18150,00
030162530049;30;84;00;;BRABANT, SIMONE:;;;12321,24
150363430112;15;02;00;;BRABETZ, HEIKO:;;;14850,00
140371403457;03;69;00;;BRACH, ANDREAS:;;;2870,00
051159406154;05;06;00;;BRACH, HARTMUT:;;;17710,00
110637528226;98;27;00;;BRACHAUS, GISELA:;;;23760,00
310540429711;97;06;00;;BRACHAUS, KLAUS:;;;27375,00
290531429730;15;40;00;;BRACHLOW, HERBERT:;;;28500,00
110652529817;30;74;00;;BRACHMANN, DORIS:;;;23262,86
230652413423;04;11;00;;BRACHMANN, HANS-DIETER:;;;26520,00
021165426226;14;40;00;;BRACHMANN, TILO:;;;5263,20
180764401811;02;80;00;;BRACHMANN, WILFRIED:;;;14148,00
210947404438;04;18;00;;BRACHOLD, HERBERT:;;;20872,50
310547412234;07;00;40;;BRACHWITZ, DETLEV:;;;19320,00
200269412287;99;02;00;;BRACHWITZ, GERO:;;;9600,00
300457504515;04;00;41;;BRACHWITZ, ILONA:;;;17595,00
051269413128;18;32;00;;BRACHWITZ, JO(E)RG:;;;9510,00
261042512215;96;15;05;;BRACHWITZ, KRISTINA:;;;26104,16
280752402110;99;43;00;;BRACK, HANS-JUERGEN:;;;19440,00
260639419318;10;00;43;;BRACK, HELMUT:;;;22250,00
220758416412;09;08;00;;BRACK, LUTZ:;;;17595,00
080342429728;94;65;00;;BRACK, MANFRED:;;;23250,00
120760411524;07;00;48;;BRACK, UWE:;;;18013,53
010152404614;04;00;43;;BRACKLOW, EBERHARD:;;;27300,00
210533430054;18;28;00;;BRACKLOW, SIEGFRIED:;;;28500,00
120251404713;17;00;00;;BRACKMANN, GUENTER:;;;25920,00
270162509541;97;06;00;;BRACKROCK, ANDREA:;;;14997,25
151150430068;96;15;00;650/75/11, :;BRADA, WOLFGANG;1130;FRANKFURTER ALLEE 128;
151150430068;96;15;00;650/75/11, :;BRADA, WOLFGANG;1130;FRANKFURTER ALLEE 128;
040469422025;18;32;00;;BRADATSCH, TIMO:;;;9675,00
210655426918;18;35;00;;BRADE, ANDREAS:;;;22350,00
240960530081;99;77;00;;BRADE, ANGELA:;;;19636,77
291157404318;04;51;00;;BRADE, DIRK:;;;20700,00
050535429727;15;53;00;;BRADE, FRED:;;;35250,00
180434430097;18;28;00;;BRADE, GERHARD:;;;27375,00
280665430252;97;08;00;;BRADE, HEIKO:;;;17384,00
061059430025;97;22;00;;BRADE, INGO:;;;18630,00
110768425067;18;32;00;;BRADE, JO(E)RG:;;;9675,00
300170428922;99;43;00;;BRADE, MARIO:;;;9600,00
111268407238;18;35;00;;BRADE, OLIVER:;;;9600,00
230851400211;96;15;21;;BRADE, PETER:;;;25761,38
210742424929;94;11;00;271/68, :;BRADE, ROLF;1600;HERDERSTR. 6;
210742424929;94;11;00;271/68, :;BRADE, ROLF;1600;HERDERSTR. 6;
070336524914;13;26;00;;BRADE, ROSWITHA:;;;25375,00
250748417734;09;08;00;;BRADEL, WOLFGANG:;;;24480,00
100662414811;30;47;00;;BRADEMANN, FRANK:;;;16830,00
060669400830;01;02;00;;BRADEMANN, JENS:;;;8550,00
300344400824;17;00;00;;BRADEMANN, JUERGEN:;;;31680,00
280758415318;08;00;50;;BRADL, ACHIM:;;;16912,50
030562430194;96;15;10;;BRADLER, THORSTEN:;;;18090,00
040669407321;05;69;00;;BRADTKE, MICHAEL:;;;9510,00
240769407421;99;40;00;;BRADTKE, UDO:;;;8300,00
180656529738;94;65;00;;BRAEHMER, IRIS:;;;18529,85
261049404516;18;25;00;;BRAEKOW, ERHARD:;;;27750,00
131256516224;97;07;00;;BRAEKOW, UTE:;;;19046,74
060458404129;97;08;00;;BRAEMER, JOERG:;;;20412,50
270953404113;18;29;00;;BRAEMER, KLAUS-DIETER:;;;23280,00
160254411915;07;00;54;;BRAEMER, LOTHAR:;;;26640,00
260953407411;05;00;40;;BRAEMER, UWE:;;;26640,00
311049516211;99;41;00;;BRAEMING, ILONA:;;;27000,00
280648429751;98;84;00;;BRAEMING, RAINER:;;;22687,50
060238427417;14;06;00;;BRAENDEL, ARMIN:;;;22437,50
260141529712;99;49;00;;BRAENLICH, DORIS:;;;27250,00
191069409129;06;69;00;;BRAENZEL, THOMAS:;;;9510,00
191169500712;01;96;31;;BRAESEL, ANKA:;;;2297,58
071169430025;15;69;00;;BRAESEL, MATHIAS:;;;9510,00
250943407611;05;00;40;;BRAETSCH, UWE:;;;25562,50
090552506444;98;82;00;;BRAETZ, MONIKA:;;;22916,37
120248409214;04;12;00;;BRAEUER, DIETER:;;;21000,00
201065429217;18;33;00;;BRAEUER, DIRK:;;;14110,04
131128430012;99;02;00;;BRAEUER, GERD:;;;37500,00
270437430059;30;47;00;;BRAEUER, GUENTER:;;;20880,00
310843429751;97;06;00;;BRAEUER, HERBERT:;;;24000,00
220263426213;02;00;44;;BRAEUER, INGOLF:;;;19140,00
151256424985;97;17;00;;BRAEUER, JUERGEN:;;;21332,50
171163430057;15;00;49;;BRAEUER, KARSTEN:;;;17572,50
280464426716;14;80;00;;BRAEUER, MATHIAS:;;;15482,50
310557415121;96;15;25;;BRAEUER, MICHAEL:;;;25884,00
180661423823;13;00;43;;BRAEUER, PETER:;;;16142,50
170955513024;99;77;00;;BRAEUER, SABINE:;;;10394,09
270853426219;97;29;00;;BRAEUER, STEFFEN:;;;26640,00
191155527711;30;49;00;;BRAEUER, STEFFI:;;;11382,21
241065426346;94;03;00;;BRAEUER, SVEN:;;;11016,00
270546407210;30;42;00;;BRAEUER, UDO:;;;19440,00
140160425074;13;08;00;;BRAEUER, VOLKER:;;;15592,50
041244428260;99;78;00;;BRAEUER, WILFRIED:;;;25975,00
150469528230;14;53;00;;BRAEUNIG, ANNETT:;;;12205,00
071252429754;30;47;00;;BRAEUNIG, BERND:;;;24120,00
190532429718;99;40;00;;BRAEUNIG, GERHARD:;;;28500,00
270153429718;96;15;13;;BRAEUNIG, HANS-JUERGEN:;;;25530,00
040940530061;98;83;00;;BRAEUNIG, HELGA:;;;23040,00
040851503344;30;84;00;;BRAEUNIG, ILONA:;;;21390,00
200551529753;96;15;31;;BRAEUNIG, INGRID:;;;25920,00
010242424512;13;00;49;;BRAEUNIG, JUERGEN:;;;27000,00
081144422714;04;26;00;;BRAEUNIG, KLAUS-JUERGEN:;;;23187,50
250249428228;30;80;00;;BRAEUNIG, REINER:;;;22590,00
200149528226;14;30;00;;BRAEUNIG, SONJA:;;;16610,00
231249524937;30;80;00;;BRAEUNIG, SONJA:;;;21045,00
310371417444;09;69;00;;BRAEUNIG, SWEN:;;;3928,06
110461422013;98;84;00;;BRAEUNIG, ULF:;;;18610,96
150667430189;15;18;00;;BRAEUNIGER, OLAF:;;;14819,00
190750420017;11;00;43;;BRAEUNING, HUBERTUS:;;;29160,00
030851528315;30;84;00;;BRAEUNING, MARGIT:;;;15101,16
051155414210;07;08;00;;BRAEUNING, ROLF:;;;17077,50
160163430109;98;81;00;;BRAEUNLICH, FRANK:;;;16830,00
100568413716;97;22;00;;BRAEUNLICH, FRANK:;;;14994,00
130652424976;60;90;00;;BRAEUNLICH, GERD:;;;
130652424976;60;90;00;;BRAEUNLICH, GERD:;;;18917,01
140440429731;98;84;00;;BRAEUNLICH, JUERGEN:;;;30187,50
190639418218;10;00;40;;BRAEUNLICH, KLAUS:;;;25500,00
270261430126;97;06;00;;BRAEUNLICH, WOLFRAM:;;;18232,50
141039506926;99;43;00;;BRAEUNLING, ANNEMARIE:;;;20625,00
231047413411;97;01;00;;BRAEUNLING, EBERHARD:;;;27750,00
120451421817;99;02;00;;BRAEUNLING, GUENTER:;;;28980,00
080342406913;99;43;00;;BRAEUNLING, WILFRIED:;;;21750,00
041070417739;97;01;00;;BRAEUTIGAM, ANDRE:;;;3070,16
180457423623;17;00;00;;BRAEUTIGAM, ANDREAS:;;;18285,00
200950517717;09;40;00;;BRAEUTIGAM, BRIGITTE:;;;19050,20
041244417748;09;51;00;;BRAEUTIGAM, ERNST:;;;27000,00
191043406114;04;06;00;;BRAEUTIGAM, GOETZ:;;;22437,50
251029420210;11;00;47;;BRAEUTIGAM, GUENTER:;;;27000,00
290753408310;06;14;00;;BRAEUTIGAM, HANS-HENNING:;;;18457,50
061150409315;10;06;00;;BRAEUTIGAM, HELMUT:;;;22475,00
111046430053;18;27;00;;BRAEUTIGAM, HOLGER:;;;27750,00
300347429729;97;06;00;;BRAEUTIGAM, JOERGEN:;;;26250,00
191169430048;99;02;00;;BRAEUTIGAM, MARCO:;;;13880,00
160748429779;15;00;41;;BRAEUTIGAM, PETER:;;;33120,00
010369408544;12;69;00;;BRAEUTIGAM, RONALD:;;;12412,26
301269428230;14;69;00;;BRAEUTIGAM, STEFFEN:;;;12085,00
270749423931;99;13;00;;BRAEUTIGAM, WOLFRAM:;;;27060,00
280868430041;18;35;00;;BRAEUTIGAMM, HENRY:;;;10600,00
210963402619;02;00;49;;BRAHM, FRANK:;;;19965,00
130647402510;02;53;00;;BRAHM, GERHARD:;;;27000,00
090866402648;01;00;48;;BRAHM, RENE:;;;12035,00
031170401516;02;06;00;;BRAHM, THOMAS:;;;3510,00
190469402511;02;06;00;;BRAHM, THORSTEN:;;;13175,00
130171524626;13;07;00;;BRAJER, KATHRIN:;;;3220,00
271256409546;06;03;00;;BRAMER, SIEGFRIED:;;;17490,00
280170415114;98;82;00;;BRAMIG, RENE:;;;10376,13
120769403918;18;35;00;;BRAMMER, ANDREAS:;;;10035,00
140271416453;18;80;00;;BRAND, AXEL:;;;2945,00
130635429716;97;06;00;;BRAND, EBERHARD:;;;37500,00
020134529711;97;06;00;;BRAND, EDITH:;;;25375,00
180764421812;12;55;00;;BRAND, EGBERT:;;;16170,00
010359417789;09;15;00;;BRAND, FRANK:;;;17974,00
050152421816;12;00;52;;BRAND, GUNTER:;;;25200,00
070558508936;04;55;00;;BRAND, HEIKE:;;;18669,32
200170413749;99;43;00;;BRAND, JAN:;;;9510,00
281069408512;98;82;00;;BRAND, JOERG:;;;10376,13
280970409927;18;35;00;;BRAND, MARIO:;;;2795,00
160241428224;14;00;40;;BRAND, ROLAND:;;;26820,00
290370413016;05;69;00;;BRAND, STEFAN:;;;9910,00
300870421828;18;34;00;;BRAND, STEFFEN:;;;6736,77
190569417534;18;33;00;;BRAND, THOMAS:;;;9600,00
130755423626;04;53;00;;BRAND, WOLFRAM:;;;24150,00
100857516025;11;77;00;;BRANDAU, MARITTA:;;;16708,73
271169413248;08;00;44;;BRANDAU, SVEN:;;;8300,00
170153416011;11;06;00;;BRANDAU, WOLFGANG:;;;24782,50
281052402720;02;55;00;;BRANDECKER, DIETER:;;;20160,00
220969402715;17;00;00;;BRANDENBURG, AXEL:;;;8300,00
241169427036;94;03;00;;BRANDENBURG, BERND:;;;9630,00
281252405213;30;63;00;;BRANDENBURG, BERND:;;;14100,00
010359400514;01;06;27;;BRANDENBURG, DIETMAR:;;;18457,50
061152424914;13;15;00;;BRANDENBURG, HANS:;;;10002,57
230940522819;96;15;22;;BRANDENBURG, HILDEGARD:;;;24480,00
090267409928;07;06;00;;BRANDENBURG, INGO:;;;16832,32
110171431114;15;69;00;;BRANDENBURG, INGO:;;;2925,64
090663506922;30;72;00;;BRANDENBURG, JANA:;;;13860,00
110139402110;02;19;00;;BRANDENBURG, KLAUS:;;;29250,00
080965403428;97;08;00;;BRANDENBURG, LUTZ:;;;16470,00
031164422775;94;65;00;;BRANDENBURG, LUTZ:;;;17985,00
301035422725;97;22;00;;BRANDENBURG, MANFRED:;;;27937,50
020966404356;18;28;00;;BRANDENBURG, RENE:;;;16686,00
100244429746;99;43;00;;BRANDENBURG, ROLF:;;;27000,00
240164430063;94;03;00;;BRANDENBURG, THOMAS:;;;19800,00
300669430036;18;33;00;;BRANDENBURG, TINO:;;;6816,29
260942425008;13;07;00;;BRANDENBURGER, KLAUS:;;;25216,68
030565405912;04;00;40;;BRANDENBURGER, OLAF:;;;16665,00
141058523924;13;55;00;;BRANDENBURGER, PETRA:;;;16088,13
180656411545;07;51;00;;BRANDES, GERALD:;;;17710,00
230251428915;14;18;00;;BRANDHOFF, MANFRED:;;;25200,00
140855420018;96;15;26;;BRANDIES, JUERGEN:;;;21780,00
020855519724;96;15;26;;BRANDIES, SABINE:;;;17940,00
231268407410;18;35;00;;BRANDIS, ANDRE:;;;10900,00
140465402615;02;06;00;;BRANDIS, DIRK:;;;16500,00
130364407426;97;22;00;;BRANDIS, GERD:;;;17423,09
290565411846;07;00;53;;BRANDL, RALF:;;;14355,00
150168408411;18;35;00;;BRANDL, TONI:;;;9675,00
200458428288;14;00;57;;BRANDL, UWE:;;;20355,00
260753409113;06;65;00;;BRANDL, WERNER:;;;20040,00
210360413415;08;00;46;;BRANDL, WILFRIED:;;;22110,00
111266421511;12;09;00;;BRANDNER, ANDREAS:;;;11016,00
260443429717;97;06;00;;BRANDNER, GERD:;;;26250,00
011149422779;12;00;40;;BRANDNER, HARALD:;;;23200,00
080562425112;99;09;00;;BRANDNER, HENNING:;;;18425,00
080468430310;99;77;00;;BRANDNER, JENS:;;;14319,00
080468430302;97;06;00;;BRANDNER, MARKO:;;;15021,00
180669402138;99;43;00;;BRANDSTAEDTER, DIRK:;;;13575,00
020446402111;02;06;00;;BRANDSTAEDTER, SIEGMAR:;;;23250,00
080329406118;17;00;00;;BRANDSTAETER, SIEGFRIED:;;;33000,00
021240408918;06;60;00;;BRANDT, ALBRECHT:;;;23250,00
290828430011;97;06;00;;BRANDT, ALWIN:;;;39750,00
010162400617;04;06;00;;BRANDT, ANDREAS:;;;18260,00
050558402121;02;51;00;;BRANDT, ARNOLD:;;;16560,00
151246503719;17;00;00;;BRANDT, BAERBEL:;;;20625,00
080471526145;97;06;00;;BRANDT, BEATRICE:;;;4900,00
031052424936;94;03;00;;BRANDT, BERND:;;;25200,00
140157502737;30;47;00;;BRANDT, BIRKA:;;;17693,00
060739530076;97;17;00;;BRANDT, BRIGITTE:;;;21750,00
031243406415;04;80;00;;BRANDT, BURCKHARD:;;;26625,00
200856505015;18;77;00;;BRANDT, CHRISTIANE:;;;18975,00
270257409914;15;03;00;;BRANDT, CLAUS-DIETER:;;;20010,00
290453527641;94;30;00;;BRANDT, DAGMAR:;;;19664,33
281266406727;99;14;00;;BRANDT, DIEGO:;;;14375,00
090647413910;08;08;00;;BRANDT, DIETER:;;;17687,50
040552402711;99;40;00;;BRANDT, DIETER:;;;21375,00
010962430136;18;71;20;;BRANDT, DIETMAR:;;;14685,00
110355407119;18;78;00;;BRANDT, DIETRICH:;;;20280,00
151168412255;18;35;00;;BRANDT, DIRK:;;;9825,00
251045500827;01;80;00;;BRANDT, DORIT:;;;15660,57
101251416411;09;00;44;;BRANDT, EBERHARD:;;;23760,00
091058410628;07;03;00;;BRANDT, FRANK:;;;19200,66
240852404029;03;00;49;;BRANDT, GERT:;;;22320,00
190937429724;99;26;00;;BRANDT, GUENTER:;;;28500,00
291051426316;99;55;00;;BRANDT, GUNTER:;;;24960,00
070535403912;03;00;48;;BRANDT, HANS-DIETER:;;;18375,00
150653410718;07;43;00;;BRANDT, HANS-HELMUT:;;;23040,00
130848414411;08;00;56;;BRANDT, HANS-JUERGEN:;;;17192,50
061152411419;17;00;00;;BRANDT, HANS-PETER:;;;19440,00
040749409116;99;40;00;;BRANDT, HANS-ULRICH:;;;27360,00
240843403710;17;00;00;;BRANDT, HARTMUT:;;;18285,00
051259406119;94;03;00;;BRANDT, HEIKO:;;;18345,00
241166403119;03;00;42;;BRANDT, HEINO:;;;2236,00
230236429717;98;18;00;;BRANDT, HELMUT:;;;35250,00
280369407525;97;01;00;;BRANDT, HENRY:;;;3674,19
031256430246;15;00;41;;BRANDT, HOLGER:;;;26162,50
220539429731;96;15;22;;BRANDT, HORST:;;;27187,50
281147403216;03;06;00;;BRANDT, JOACHIM:;;;21750,00
291062413027;08;80;00;;BRANDT, JOCHEN:;;;16170,00
120364430109;96;15;22;;BRANDT, JUERGEN:;;;15510,00
060552400618;01;06;27;;BRANDT, KARL:;;;18227,50
290961400719;18;32;00;;BRANDT, KARSTEN:;;;23100,00
140958411915;30;48;00;;BRANDT, KARSTEN:;;;18240,00
290556509518;99;10;00;;BRANDT, KERSTIN:;;;21900,00
110344413011;07;55;00;;BRANDT, KLAUS:;;;20125,00
070870430619;15;69;00;;BRANDT, MAREK:;;;2925,64
020239529718;99;02;00;;BRANDT, MARIA:;;;24000,00
050155529734;98;83;00;;BRANDT, MARION:;;;15720,26
040869412272;07;06;00;;BRANDT, MATTHIAS:;;;8592,10
091260401514;99;43;00;;BRANDT, MICHAEL:;;;17647,02
200558414529;08;51;00;;BRANDT, PETER:;;;19492,50
011149420319;11;14;00;;BRANDT, PETER:;;;24462,50
250466422017;97;22;00;;BRANDT, PETER:;;;17251,50
010252526328;98;83;00;;BRANDT, PETRA:;;;21600,00
290449415321;08;08;00;;BRANDT, RAINER:;;;23875,00
200945430051;15;08;00;;BRANDT, RAINER:;;;24000,00
041068428332;97;22;00;;BRANDT, RICO:;;;9875,00
030847416417;09;00;44;;BRANDT, ROBERT:;;;21562,50
301068424436;18;31;00;;BRANDT, RONNY:;;;9675,00
270869419822;07;69;00;;BRANDT, SILVIO:;;;8302,58
100271426858;18;32;00;;BRANDT, STEFFEN:;;;6958,87
270169430035;96;15;22;;BRANDT, STEPHAN:;;;9555,00
290170411227;18;34;00;;BRANDT, SVEN:;;;9510,00
050970428251;18;31;00;;BRANDT, SYLVIO:;;;6705,00
240463402134;02;08;00;;BRANDT, THILO:;;;16252,50
200969403111;18;38;00;;BRANDT, THOMAS:;;;9510,00
300964402628;02;09;00;;BRANDT, TORSTEN:;;;16720,00
130353429718;99;14;00;;BRANDT, UDO:;;;24300,00
180735402719;02;26;00;;BRANDT, ULRICH:;;;23250,00
260256502739;99;55;00;;BRANDT, UTE:;;;19969,19
200770400730;18;35;00;;BRANDT, VOLKER:;;;3475,00
120933429715;95;45;00;;BRANDT, WALTER:;;;21750,00
191155405917;04;06;00;;BRANDT, WILFRIED:;;;18842,50
250136429718;99;02;00;;BRANDT, WILFRIED:;;;31125,00
190455405631;30;47;00;;BRANDT, WILFRIED:;;;26840,00
270158411410;07;09;00;;BRANDT, WOLFGANG:;;;21102,50
120149402412;12;18;00;;BRANDT, WOLFGANG:;;;23712,50
151051400824;01;14;00;;BRANDT, WOLFGANG:;;;20520,00
270953409117;99;40;00;;BRANDT, WOLFGANG:;;;25530,00
090655419036;99;43;00;;BRANDTNER, MANFRED:;;;25875,00
250660407515;97;01;00;;BRANDTNER, THOMAS:;;;23712,50
151064430280;96;15;13;;BRANDWEIN, MICHAEL:;;;16500,00
251239530127;99;77;00;;BRANKE, HELGA:;;;41040,00
241039430288;94;65;00;;BRANKE, JUERGEN:;;;27750,00
190446409518;06;02;00;;BRANKE, KLAUS:;;;28312,50
070630430011;97;07;00;;BRANKE, KURT:;;;27000,00
140154402714;30;54;00;;BRANNYS, GEORG:;;;24620,00
211166427412;99;43;00;;BRANSTNER, JENS:;;;15714,00
210749420517;12;07;00;;BRANZ, KLAUS:;;;29625,00
190449410813;07;00;49;;BRASA, GUENTER:;;;27360,00
110970412243;07;06;00;;BRASACK, GUNAR:;;;3557,10
290148410615;07;06;00;;BRASCHE, KLAUS-DIETER:;;;21187,50
070350429796;15;08;00;;BRASCHING, DIETER:;;;22413,01
180263530068;15;19;00;;BRASE, SIMONE:;;;14912,98
011069427625;18;34;00;;BRASE, SWEN:;;;6876,77
260371422443;12;09;00;;BRASOW, RAMON:;;;2700,00
010329430018;97;08;00;;BRASSAT, ALFRED:;;;5437,50
070261400852;01;15;00;;BRASSAT, FRANK:;;;18312,00
140569400868;01;69;00;;BRASSAT, RONALD:;;;6671,61
021270400220;01;69;00;;BRASSEN, ANDREAS:;;;2896,61
111254421215;96;15;00;3039/82, M:;BRATE, ANDREAS;1142;MAX-HERRMANN-STR. 4;
111254421215;96;15;00;3039/82, M:;BRATE, ANDREAS;1142;MAX-HERRMANN-STR. 4;
210637413216;08;51;00;;BRATFISCH, FRITZ:;;;24000,00
120964419018;10;65;00;;BRATFISCH, PASQUALE:;;;12925,00
161253419311;97;01;00;;BRATGE, HANS-JUERGEN:;;;27360,00
280536409529;06;08;00;;BRATKE, ALFRED:;;;28250,00
021267422736;10;00;51;;BRATKE, MAIK:;;;13032,00
240366408024;06;51;00;;BRATKE, THOMAS:;;;16645,50
010554426314;13;00;40;;BRATTIG, ANDREAS:;;;18179,59
300959402244;99;43;00;;BRATZ, DETLEF:;;;21332,50
020760502225;98;27;00;;BRATZ, MANUELA:;;;21142,50
130644428010;14;18;00;;BRATZ, ROLAND:;;;26250,00
200952506915;99;49;00;;BRAUCHLER, DORIS:;;;17825,00
210751403732;17;00;00;;BRAUCHMANN, BERND:;;;30960,00
070652503015;17;00;00;;BRAUCHMANN, INGRID:;;;18199,95
111157403728;03;53;00;;BRAUCHMANN, RALF:;;;22440,00
040650524018;99;09;00;;BRAUER, BAERBEL:;;;25920,00
150358422791;12;00;40;;BRAUER, BERND:;;;22080,00
110554420527;12;00;42;;BRAUER, BERND:;;;26640,00
140762430137;98;83;00;;BRAUER, BJOERN:;;;17270,00
011240502518;97;01;00;;BRAUER, BRIGITTE:;;;20250,00
040552505112;18;77;00;;BRAUER, DORIS:;;;21362,21
311041529720;99;43;00;;BRAUER, ERIKA:;;;22125,00
200166412233;60;90;00;;BRAUER, FRANK:;;;
200166412233;60;90;00;;BRAUER, FRANK:;;;13630,00
120250417117;09;06;00;;BRAUER, GOTTFRIED:;;;21000,00
190843400816;94;65;00;;BRAUER, GUENTER:;;;24000,00
080341429734;99;43;00;;BRAUER, GUENTHER:;;;21750,00
090248429747;94;65;00;;BRAUER, HANS-JOACHIM:;;;27750,00
290965509535;06;09;00;;BRAUER, HEIKE:;;;12762,58
170169402714;01;69;00;;BRAUER, HEIKO:;;;13250,00
180266406206;04;06;00;;BRAUER, HOLGER:;;;16281,00
190933406138;97;08;00;;BRAUER, HORST:;;;28500,00
120962407224;97;01;00;;BRAUER, JAN:;;;16335,00
181169409514;97;22;00;;BRAUER, JENS:;;;6757,50
031265413018;17;00;00;;BRAUER, JOERG:;;;13345,50
271254429746;97;08;00;;BRAUER, KLAUS-PETER:;;;21700,00
250158530147;99;09;00;;BRAUER, MARTINA:;;;14916,87
250451419325;99;09;00;;BRAUER, MICHAEL:;;;28320,00
250933430068;60;90;00;;BRAUER, PETER:;;;
250933430068;60;90;00;;BRAUER, PETER:;;;23520,00
300839413045;08;00;42;;BRAUER, RUDOLF:;;;34560,00
180937429717;94;03;00;;BRAUER, SIEGFRIED:;;;21000,00
241260530122;15;80;00;;BRAUER, SILVIA:;;;14171,58
090163402529;94;03;00;;BRAUER, TORSTEN:;;;18810,00
270737402519;02;06;00;;BRAUER, WILLY:;;;21000,00
201161406197;04;08;00;;BRAUER, WOLFGANG:;;;15744,00
010234509225;30;56;00;;BRAUMANN, ILSE:;;;13680,00
220769410710;18;35;00;;BRAUMANN, RALF:;;;6736,77
250248412216;05;06;00;;BRAUMANN, ROLF-DIETER:;;;19500,00
040751410319;07;12;00;;BRAUMANN, ULRICH:;;;21060,00
071268406936;18;31;00;;BRAUN, ANDRE:;;;9825,00
271251426611;94;03;00;;BRAUN, ANDRE:;;;24900,00
310861409578;06;00;40;;BRAUN, ANDREAS:;;;17325,00
280963413119;99;43;00;;BRAUN, ANDREAS:;;;16260,48
100469404611;99;43;00;;BRAUN, ANDREAS:;;;9600,00
170154422720;30;57;00;;BRAUN, ANDREAS:;;;16080,00
240569528923;14;00;54;;BRAUN, ANETT:;;;13275,00
181252527319;94;03;00;;BRAUN, ANNEROSE:;;;20872,50
150641406930;99;43;00;;BRAUN, BERND:;;;21625,00
191061500876;01;51;00;;BRAUN, BIANCA:;;;16716,07
270846528225;14;08;00;;BRAUN, BIRGIT:;;;21387,50
091049504411;03;53;00;;BRAUN, BRIGITTE:;;;23840,00
030743506928;99;43;00;;BRAUN, BRIGITTE:;;;19172,37
071047506917;99;43;00;;BRAUN, BRIGITTE:;;;20182,50
220728404111;99;43;00;;BRAUN, BRUNO:;;;21750,00
070643428228;99;26;00;;BRAUN, CLAUS-DIETER:;;;24125,00
190355421319;98;84;00;;BRAUN, DIETER:;;;22140,00
280758428215;99;43;00;;BRAUN, DIETMAR:;;;18630,00
060130504118;99;43;00;;BRAUN, DORA:;;;17940,00
090639429728;98;19;00;;BRAUN, EDGAR:;;;51750,00
091053404317;97;17;00;;BRAUN, EDWIN:;;;22320,00
070546411416;07;07;00;;BRAUN, ERNST-ERIK:;;;28020,00
280762502510;02;00;44;;BRAUN, EVELYN:;;;13767,07
091148428012;30;51;00;;BRAUN, FRANK:;;;15120,00
281260521839;98;85;00;;BRAUN, GABRIELA:;;;17283,64
281036417754;98;19;00;;BRAUN, GERHARD:;;;25200,00
190756403728;99;43;00;;BRAUN, GERO:;;;21390,00
310844404310;94;30;00;;BRAUN, HANS-JOACHIM:;;;27750,00
151053417160;11;02;00;;BRAUN, HANS-JOERG:;;;25200,00
110149426714;97;06;00;;BRAUN, HARALD:;;;23360,00
120338430068;99;53;00;;BRAUN, HARRI:;;;25920,00
271154417748;09;40;00;;BRAUN, HEINZ:;;;23250,00
080665429239;14;08;00;;BRAUN, HENDRIK:;;;15322,00
100636403713;03;99;00;;BRAUN, HORST:;;;42750,00
100565403723;03;18;00;;BRAUN, INGO:;;;21120,00
190170500424;18;80;00;;BRAUN, JANA:;;;13730,00
151168422744;17;00;00;;BRAUN, JENS:;;;8300,00
020653424719;13;00;51;;BRAUN, JOCHEN:;;;25200,00
240362421010;12;65;00;;BRAUN, JU(E)RGEN:;;;17022,50
200251413943;08;00;61;;BRAUN, JUERGEN:;;;17077,50
140154421317;99;40;00;;BRAUN, JUERGEN:;;;25320,00
260441529714;15;07;00;;BRAUN, KARIN:;;;16838,64
160952411816;07;80;00;;BRAUN, KARL-HEINZ:;;;18000,00
181062430102;99;51;00;;BRAUN, KARSTEN:;;;17820,00
051243429738;97;06;00;;BRAUN, KLAUS:;;;20500,00
121249404313;03;02;00;;BRAUN, MANFRED:;;;29250,00
040637428216;14;11;00;;BRAUN, MANFRED:;;;26312,50
040244406913;99;43;00;;BRAUN, MANFRED:;;;24000,00
071064402714;02;14;00;;BRAUN, MARIO:;;;15840,00
090267403120;98;82;00;;BRAUN, MATHIAS:;;;17490,00
041264430085;99;02;00;;BRAUN, MICHAEL:;;;18205,00
061064406142;04;06;00;;BRAUN, MIKE:;;;15268,00
050670400046;98;19;00;;BRAUN, MIRKO:;;;3620,00
101069429224;18;31;00;;BRAUN, MIRKO:;;;9600,00
080150504623;99;77;00;;BRAUN, MONIKA:;;;21600,00
080854429713;98;83;00;;BRAUN, PETER:;;;19237,50
240166421320;98;19;00;;BRAUN, RAINER:;;;11016,00
241159417715;99;53;00;;BRAUN, RALF:;;;18343,26
271262402535;02;80;00;;BRAUN, RENE:;;;16190,04
090970414411;18;33;00;;BRAUN, ROLAND:;;;2795,00
080237528214;14;51;00;;BRAUN, SIEGLINDE:;;;19965,00
010169500418;18;78;00;;BRAUN, SILKE:;;;14025,00
100269413935;18;34;00;;BRAUN, STEFFEN:;;;9675,00
050271423128;18;38;00;;BRAUN, STEFFEN:;;;2795,00
130770424723;18;35;00;;BRAUN, SVEN:;;;6705,00
210369417738;18;32;00;;BRAUN, THOMAS:;;;10725,00
280569426210;18;33;00;;BRAUN, TINO:;;;6958,87
201058400619;01;69;00;;BRAUN, UWE:;;;21792,50
070238428224;14;02;00;;BRAUN, WALTER:;;;30750,00
310534429723;99;14;00;;BRAUN, WERNER:;;;37500,00
010845422727;12;08;00;;BRAUN, WOLF-DIETER:;;;22125,00
290770409411;18;28;00;;BRAUNE, ANDRE:;;;2720,00
210767410814;07;06;00;;BRAUNE, FRITZ-GUENTER:;;;16175,23
301053414219;06;08;00;;BRAUNE, GUENTER:;;;17422,50
140235429724;97;17;00;;BRAUNE, HEINZ:;;;41250,00
271064428240;14;14;00;;BRAUNE, JENS:;;;16170,00
070271400864;01;69;00;;BRAUNE, JENS:;;;2896,61
280543529713;97;17;00;;BRAUNE, JUTTA:;;;24562,50
191270409817;18;32;00;;BRAUNE, MARCO:;;;2795,00
230264412322;30;62;00;;BRAUNE, MARIO:;;;14685,00
070552424926;94;11;00;;BRAUNE, RALPH:;;;22942,50
210366415315;97;08;00;;BRAUNE, RENE:;;;16960,53
080260412228;99;02;00;;BRAUNE, THOMAS:;;;23045,00
200655414512;11;20;00;;BRAUNE, UWE:;;;23460,00
260869430061;99;43;00;;BRAUNEIS, UWE:;;;9510,00
261161409237;06;69;00;;BRAUNER, DIETMAR:;;;16967,50
181146424519;13;20;00;;BRAUNER, MANFRED:;;;24000,00
310742524514;13;77;00;;BRAUNER, VIKTORIA:;;;14677,42
180751417742;09;01;00;;BRAUNER, WERNER:;;;24480,00
140252429806;96;15;11;;BRAUNERT, HANS-JOACHIM:;;;33120,00
110462430103;96;15;21;;BRAUNERT, MATTHIAS:;;;17490,00
220734530085;15;80;00;;BRAUNGARDT, ELFRIEDE:;;;20375,00
160757430122;94;65;00;;BRAUNGARDT, VOLKER:;;;19008,39
120471415713;08;69;00;;BRAUNGART, STEFFEN:;;;3220,00
080955408532;18;77;00;;BRAUNS, ANDREAS:;;;21409,03
250154413111;97;08;00;;BRAUNS, LOTHAR:;;;22500,00
080757419716;97;08;00;;BRAUNSBERGER, DETLEF:;;;17595,00
020851500719;01;96;31;;BRAUNSCHWEIG, ANGELIKA:;;;17806,45
021049423810;94;03;00;;BRAUNSCHWEIG, ECKHARD:;;;24000,00
300949523835;98;83;00;;BRAUNSCHWEIG, HEIDI:;;;18802,50
150369408928;18;32;00;;BRAUNSCHWEIG, JENS:;;;9675,00
230442429718;99;43;00;;BRAUNSCHWEIG, JUERGEN:;;;22500,00
240549400711;01;96;31;;BRAUNSCHWEIG, SIEGBERT:;;;18000,00
120338415351;08;02;00;;BRAUTZSCH, PETER:;;;25500,00
120571427623;18;32;00;;BRAUTZSCH, STEFFEN:;;;2795,00
231166427613;95;45;00;;BRAUTZSCH, UWE:;;;15714,00
241267415338;99;43;00;;BRAUTZSCH, WOLFGANG:;;;14025,00
090252528318;14;96;00;;BRECHEIS, MONIKA:;;;19440,00
260759406431;04;00;45;;BRECHLIN, FRED:;;;21330,00
070652408915;98;19;00;;BRECHLIN, GERT:;;;25530,00
290649406438;04;55;00;;BRECHLIN, HELMUT:;;;20072,58
070344406168;04;30;00;;BRECHLIN, KLAUS-PETER:;;;24000,00
300744416219;09;77;00;;BRECHLING, BERNHARD:;;;37620,00
110964402778;18;71;20;;BRECHOT, TORSTEN:;;;21010,00
170968401339;01;06;26;;BRECHT, ANDREAS:;;;9510,00
220759410127;99;43;00;;BRECHT, FRANK:;;;22252,50
161257410111;99;43;00;;BRECHT, HOLGER:;;;21390,00
210950412228;07;08;00;;BRECKAU, JUERGEN:;;;20160,00
280848412217;07;06;00;;BRECKAU, WOLFGANG:;;;23812,50
201148422010;96;15;22;;BREDACK, ROLAND:;;;27300,00
200157501517;02;06;00;;BREDDIN, ANNELIE:;;;17834,27
011254402518;02;65;00;;BREDDIN, HERBERT:;;;19440,00
081163402516;07;06;00;;BREDDIN, MATTHIAS:;;;17325,00
061061413216;08;00;44;;BREDDIN, PETER:;;;18590,00
150561402526;97;01;00;;BREDDIN, ROLAND:;;;24210,00
311250407519;05;06;00;;BREDE, ECKHARD:;;;22320,00
171170403815;18;35;00;;BREDENDIEK, TINO:;;;6705,00
080259530016;18;80;00;;BREDERECK, KARIN:;;;16039,44
281257500711;30;83;00;;BREDEREKE, KARIN:;;;14263,44
140741406170;04;11;00;;BREDERLOW, ROLAND:;;;30375,00
240468530063;97;06;00;;BREDIS, CHRISTINE:;;;11420,93
210334402712;02;11;00;;BREDIS, MANFRED:;;;33750,00
280265415328;94;65;00;;BREDIS, TORSTEN:;;;16830,00
120946518514;10;06;00;;BREDOW, CHRISTINE:;;;21756,77
131144418515;10;00;46;;BREDOW, HORST:;;;24312,50
151051401958;03;00;41;;BREDOW, LOTHAR:;;;25200,00
220470404834;18;33;00;;BREDOW, MICHAEL:;;;2720,00
191262430114;15;07;00;;BREEDE, DIETMAR:;;;15675,00
250261401917;02;00;43;;BREESE, HARTMUT:;;;18232,50
230446530039;97;22;00;;BREETZ, BRIGITTE:;;;20625,00
200439430067;97;22;00;;BREETZ, GUENTER:;;;20187,50
040448401313;03;51;00;;BREETZKE, KLAUS:;;;23400,00
131167419713;18;33;00;;BREHM, FRANK:;;;10800,00
140368419829;11;69;00;;BREHM, GERD:;;;9675,00
180366420216;97;06;00;;BREHM, GERHARD:;;;16200,00
230752419013;10;00;40;;BREHM, HARTMUT:;;;24480,00
261048400812;94;11;00;;BREHM, HEINZ:;;;34500,00
140367430129;97;22;00;;BREHM, KARSTEN:;;;15876,00
200470417119;09;69;00;;BREHM, MARCO:;;;9510,00
120571410813;18;34;00;;BREHM, MIKE:;;;2795,00
080669420223;18;28;00;;BREHM, OLAF:;;;6792,09
230744422028;07;06;00;;BREHM, WOLFGANG:;;;26250,00
160753417414;97;06;00;;BREHME, HARALD:;;;25920,00
220256414222;99;51;00;;BREHME, RALF:;;;22400,00
290158407444;97;08;00;;BREHME, RENE:;;;22080,00
110469405218;18;34;00;;BREHMEL, THOMAS:;;;9675,00
181158404128;96;15;05;;BREHMER, FRED:;;;18862,50
210754529912;99;49;00;;BREHMER, GABRIELE:;;;1126,61
200150429890;15;03;00;;BREHMER, GERD:;;;24571,67
270235404119;03;40;00;;BREHMER, GERD:;;;17048,75
070235429715;96;15;15;;BREHMER, HERBERT:;;;33000,00
180942429746;99;40;00;;BREHMER, INGO:;;;26250,00
160942529714;99;43;00;;BREHMER, JUTTA:;;;19843,24
050553410122;04;80;00;;BREHMER, KARL-HEINZ:;;;18720,00
050140429714;15;22;00;;BREHMER, PETER:;;;27000,00
140537504128;03;40;00;;BREHMER, RENATE:;;;14886,77
100134422738;96;15;25;;BREHMER, WOLFGANG:;;;25500,00
190869410326;07;69;00;;BREIER, BERND:;;;2911,13
180266417757;18;32;00;;BREIER, DETLEF:;;;18396,00
270837415325;08;08;00;;BREINIG, KLAUS-PETER:;;;26250,00
010563400634;01;00;42;;BREINLINGER, FRANK:;;;17820,00
150967400619;01;00;49;;BREINLINGER, JENS:;;;12775,00
040369407020;94;03;00;;BREIT, RALF:;;;9510,00
300359400843;96;15;13;;BREITBARTH, JENS-UWE:;;;19347,50
240358417721;09;00;40;;BREITBARTH, LUTZ:;;;17820,00
240140400820;99;40;00;;BREITBARTH, MANFRED:;;;21937,50
070661500828;99;77;00;;BREITBARTH, MARION:;;;18070,34
231062400811;01;69;00;;BREITBARTH, PETER:;;;15620,00
120130430077;18;25;00;;BREITBARTH, RICHARD:;;;28500,00
080962430084;94;65;00;;BREITBARTH, STEFFEN:;;;16170,00
130940500814;99;40;00;;BREITBARTH, URSULA:;;;20032,50
290549416911;09;06;00;;BREITBARTH, WILFRIED:;;;25125,00
260641429718;99;12;00;;BREITE, MANFRED:;;;23937,50
240154524971;97;01;00;;BREITE, SUSANNE:;;;19313,80
120759404212;03;14;00;;BREITENFELD, WOLF-DIETER:;;;15181,50
281255400215;01;00;42;;BREITENFELDT, DETLEF:;;;22440,00
060658408546;98;83;00;;BREITENSTEIN, FRANK:;;;20182,50
071052411728;07;26;00;;BREITENSTEIN, HORST:;;;20010,00
050363412258;97;06;00;;BREITENSTEIN, RONALD:;;;14650,40
110156414738;99;43;00;;BREITER, HANS-GUENTER:;;;19320,00
080458413226;98;82;00;;BREITER, PETER:;;;18227,50
200569426218;18;34;00;;BREITFELD, GISO:;;;9675,00
230557404828;99;02;00;;BREITFELD, HANS:;;;24150,00
250268415115;08;69;00;;BREITFELD, UWE:;;;9875,00
110367530173;96;15;06;;BREITFELDT, INES:;;;13675,00
101238406120;04;06;00;;BREITGOFF, KLAUS:;;;24000,00
200835418211;10;00;44;;BREITHAUPT, KARL-HEINZ:;;;19875,00
291133416218;09;06;00;;BREITHAUPT, WALTER:;;;21583,36
071053419051;99;40;00;;BREITHECKER, GERO:;;;24225,00
250263522114;12;96;67;;BREITING, INA:;;;15757,50
061259422118;94;03;00;;BREITING, PETER:;;;22770,00
190450423646;14;18;00;;BREITKOPF, RAINER:;;;29625,00
290260405912;97;07;00;;BREITKREUTZ, BORIS:;;;17030,00
100854406111;04;00;40;;BREITKREUTZ, GERHARD:;;;19800,00
121041429730;98;82;00;;BREITKREUZ, HORST:;;;20625,00
301068411221;18;35;00;;BREITLAUCH, DIRK:;;;9675,00
090935417756;09;12;00;;BREITLAUCH, WERNER:;;;26250,00
140762415148;99;40;00;;BREITMANN, GOETZ:;;;19415,00
140762415121;15;69;00;;BREITMANN, JOST:;;;17077,50
210141522435;99;43;00;;BREITREITER, HELGA:;;;23250,00
280240422417;95;45;00;;BREITREITER, KARL-HELMUT:;;;37500,00
091270421228;18;33;00;;BREITREITER, THOMAS:;;;2720,00
051050421211;99;99;99;::;BREITREITER, UWE;1140;BA(E)RENSTEINSTR. 6;
051050421211;99;99;99;::;BREITREITER, UWE;1140;BA(E)RENSTEINSTR. 6;
070746530030;30;83;00;;BREITSCHUH, GISELA:;;;18060,00
190750429767;30;47;00;;BREITSCHUH, JUERGEN:;;;17280,00
310367413934;08;07;00;;BREITSCHWERDT, GOTTHARD:;;;15390,00
010344516610;97;01;00;;BREITSPRECHER, CHRISTEL:;;;21000,00
211268405230;04;69;00;;BREITSPRECHER, DIRK:;;;9675,00
160571418440;98;83;00;;BREITSPRECHER, JOERG-DIETMAR:;;;3020,00
200556403623;18;32;00;;BREITSPRECHER, JUERGEN:;;;18630,00
010571414120;18;28;00;;BREITSPRECHER, MARCO:;;;2720,00
061057430152;94;65;00;;BREITSPRECHER, PETER:;;;19665,00
261263403610;03;80;00;;BREITSPRECHER, RAINER:;;;15592,50
041144416617;09;00;45;;BREITSPRECHER, SIEGFRIED:;;;29250,00
180968413814;18;32;00;;BREITUNG, JENS:;;;9675,00
131270428212;18;35;00;;BREITZKE, ANDRE:;;;2795,00
291148401326;01;02;00;;BREITZKE, ROLF:;;;26162,50
240169403435;03;69;00;;BREMER, ANDREAS:;;;9510,00
240169411427;18;31;00;;BREMER, ANDREAS:;;;9600,00
130655503610;03;14;00;;BREMER, BRITTA:;;;17681,17
080139429722;15;69;00;;BREMER, DIETER:;;;33000,00
270450402431;02;00;47;;BREMER, DIETER:;;;16920,00
280868402411;02;69;00;;BREMER, HEIKO:;;;9555,00
110763530140;30;83;00;;BREMER, IRIS:;;;12197,15
260164430088;98;84;00;;BREMER, JENS:;;;18095,00
200234429716;96;15;14;;BREMER, KARL-HEINZ:;;;22500,00
220436404216;03;09;00;;BREMER, KURT:;;;24750,00
070249401713;94;03;00;;BREMER, MANFRED:;;;26220,00
120670429720;99;40;00;;BREMER, MIRKO:;;;2870,00
261249403913;03;26;00;;BREMER, ROBERT:;;;22275,00
020643402428;02;18;00;;BREMER, WILFRIED:;;;29250,00
160654403316;03;14;00;;BREMER, WOLFGANG:;;;18480,00
270562400836;01;19;69;;BREMERKAMP, FALK:;;;19305,00
140840510117;07;00;44;;BREMERT, ILSE:;;;22500,00
090138410113;07;00;44;;BREMERT, KLAUS:;;;18875,00
040460530011;99;77;00;;BREMERT, UTE:;;;19140,00
200251416116;05;03;00;;BREMME, KLAUS-DIETER:;;;22275,00
140555419031;10;55;00;;BREMME, WOLFGANG:;;;20100,00
151259517554;30;61;00;;BREMMERT, KATHRIN:;;;10696,78
250244430054;07;51;00;;BREMSE, JUERGEN:;;;22500,00
050963409538;99;02;00;;BRENDAHL, THOMAS:;;;19470,00
140459421713;10;00;51;;BRENDEL, ALEXANDER:;;;12675,00
151158425079;30;36;00;;BRENDEL, ANDREAS:;;;18487,00
220352507912;99;02;00;;BRENDEL, INGEBORG:;;;24480,49
090468407515;05;19;00;;BRENDEL, JOERG:;;;9872,00
010153421520;06;15;00;;BRENDEL, JUERGEN:;;;26400,00
090945428918;14;00;54;;BRENDEL, JUERGEN:;;;26640,00
070553504119;06;55;00;;BRENDEL, JUTTA:;;;21480,00
301146429719;97;22;00;;BRENDEL, KLAUS:;;;20625,00
060146430045;15;08;00;;BRENDEL, PETER:;;;24000,00
160353506119;30;56;00;;BRENDEL, URSULA:;;;13530,00
131246428212;99;02;00;;BRENDEL, WERNER:;;;27375,00
191254422712;12;00;40;;BRENDEL, WOLFGANG:;;;20700,00
100238404315;97;06;00;;BRENDEMUEHL, HELMUT:;;;24562,50
080868420517;18;32;00;;BRENDLER, ANDREAS:;;;6958,87
140651422257;98;85;00;;BRENDLER, ARNDT:;;;19440,00
310338404510;96;15;22;;BRENDLER, JOACHIM:;;;30000,00
090170404522;18;34;00;;BRENDLER, RENE:;;;10810,00
260960404518;97;01;00;;BRENDLER, STEFAN:;;;22934,35
051168400512;17;00;00;;BRENDTNER, JOERG:;;;8950,00
230342400512;01;07;00;4733/88, :;BRENDTNER, WERNER;2520;HERMANN-MATERN-STR. 16;
230342400512;01;07;00;4733/88, :;BRENDTNER, WERNER;2520;HERMANN-MATERN-STR. 16;
180152407614;15;09;00;;BRENNECKE, BURKHARDT:;;;26100,00
040569407615;97;06;00;;BRENNECKE, JOERG:;;;13750,00
240837411917;97;97;11;;BRENNECKE, ROLF:;;;35250,00
010647411525;04;19;00;;BRENNECKE, ROLF-DIETER:;;;23545,00
041137511915;94;03;00;;BRENNECKE, SIGRID:;;;22927,09
250142430061;18;40;00;;BRENNER, HEINZ:;;;24750,00
200553428219;14;00;41;;BRENNER, JUERGEN:;;;25200,00
180460402516;02;18;00;;BRENNER, LUTZ:;;;9120,00
050160430181;15;80;00;;BRENNER, WOLF-EKKEHARD:;;;17940,00
220449524727;96;15;31;;BRENNIG, BRIGITTE:;;;21600,00
040250429804;97;01;00;;BRENNIG, KLAUS:;;;29250,00
090451503420;03;41;00;;BRENTFUEHRER, MARLIES:;;;19980,00
171147403411;03;09;00;;BRENTFUEHRER, UWE:;;;24000,00
110947410610;97;01;00;;BRENZ, GERT-JOACHIM:;;;35250,00
201051411518;12;06;00;;BRESCH, HANS:;;;21975,00
280355511014;07;06;00;;BRESCH, KARIN:;;;19320,00
090254411017;07;06;00;;BRESCH, PETER:;;;20160,00
140248400816;30;43;00;;BRESEMANN, HANS-PETER:;;;17876,00
050649400228;99;12;00;;BRESEMANN, KLAUS:;;;32530,65
280155400248;99;12;00;;BRESEMANN, VOLKER:;;;21700,00
210571400892;01;06;22;;BRESIEN, MICHAEL:;;;2896,61
210160430069;15;20;00;;BRESKI, JUERGEN:;;;24150,00
230358525053;13;53;00;;BRESLER, ANKE:;;;16431,32
220647424911;13;65;00;;BRESLER, CLAUS:;;;26250,00
110856424320;13;26;00;;BRESLER, DIETMAR:;;;22965,50
300852520320;11;12;00;;BRESLER, ILONA:;;;20180,00
200867424958;18;41;30;;BRESLER, MICHAEL:;;;13200,00
160951420315;11;00;40;;BRESLER, NORBERT:;;;25200,00
180551417721;09;00;40;;BRESSA, KLAUS-DETLEF:;;;26400,00
150939402115;02;06;00;;BRESSEL, DIETER:;;;26250,00
290358530308;94;30;00;;BRESSEL, TATJANA:;;;16239,79
110758408810;94;03;00;;BRESSEM, HARALD:;;;22597,50
230553403713;94;65;00;;BRESSIN, HELMUT:;;;19440,00
070468430127;98;27;00;;BRESSLER, FRANK:;;;14332,00
210334530060;96;15;11;;BRESSLER, LIESELOTTE:;;;22620,00
290734429714;99;43;00;;BRESTRICH, WOLFGANG:;;;27000,00
230456421215;12;00;48;;BRESZLER, HANS-JUERGEN:;;;16276,50
280651426527;04;00;42;;BRESZLER, KLAUS:;;;21485,81
291142429715;99;43;00;;BRETERNITZ, DIETER:;;;24000,00
300955412218;08;20;00;;BRETERNITZ, FRED:;;;23975,00
310768413927;18;40;00;;BRETERNITZ, JO(E)RG:;;;10155,00
300463430217;99;77;00;;BRETERNITZ, UWE:;;;17572,50
290149418432;99;55;00;;BRETERNITZ, WILFRIED:;;;25500,00
241142429728;97;06;00;;BRETFELD, HERMANN:;;;24000,00
200941428229;14;02;00;;BRETFELD, KLAUS:;;;28500,00
251053429223;14;65;00;;BRETSCHNEIDER, CHRISTIAN:;;;19860,00
140548428220;96;15;18;;BRETSCHNEIDER, CHRISTIAN:;;;27360,00
250458430148;99;02;00;;BRETSCHNEIDER, DETLEF:;;;21562,50
030934429718;97;01;00;;BRETSCHNEIDER, DIETER:;;;27750,00
050158421817;12;06;00;;BRETSCHNEIDER, DIETER:;;;19320,00
290663427016;14;51;00;;BRETSCHNEIDER, DIRK:;;;17792,50
250371403622;18;29;30;;BRETSCHNEIDER, DIRK:;;;3070,16
060635429723;94;03;00;;BRETSCHNEIDER, EBERHARDT:;;;24000,00
171239429723;94;30;00;;BRETSCHNEIDER, EGON:;;;26750,00
101144425005;30;47;00;;BRETSCHNEIDER, FRANZ:;;;28780,00
270668421010;18;32;00;;BRETSCHNEIDER, GERALD:;;;9675,00
080268417760;18;35;00;;BRETSCHNEIDER, GERD:;;;10775,00
150542429774;99;77;00;;BRETSCHNEIDER, GERT:;;;24000,00
141036426218;14;03;00;;BRETSCHNEIDER, GUENTER:;;;23250,00
181255422715;94;65;00;;BRETSCHNEIDER, GUENTER:;;;17595,00
250844406728;05;00;41;;BRETSCHNEIDER, GUNTER:;;;27540,00
090455425028;13;20;00;;BRETSCHNEIDER, HARALD:;;;24880,00
150438530071;99;40;00;;BRETSCHNEIDER, HELGA:;;;17595,00
191152529770;30;83;00;;BRETSCHNEIDER, ILONA:;;;17432,26
130930530024;98;83;00;;BRETSCHNEIDER, ILSE:;;;19170,00
290959429213;15;19;00;;BRETSCHNEIDER, INGO:;;;21560,00
211068421818;18;33;00;;BRETSCHNEIDER, JAN:;;;9675,00
211165430214;97;08;00;;BRETSCHNEIDER, JAN:;;;16656,50
290867427210;14;08;00;182, :;BRETSCHNEIDER, JENS;9271;AM HANG 3;
290867427210;14;08;00;182, :;BRETSCHNEIDER, JENS;9271;AM HANG 3;
091069420928;18;34;00;;BRETSCHNEIDER, JO(E)RG:;;;10500,00
080168506731;05;00;40;;BRETSCHNEIDER, KERSTIN:;;;14382,00
160251400612;05;00;41;;BRETSCHNEIDER, KLAUS:;;;24140,00
251258408944;06;65;00;;BRETSCHNEIDER, MICHAEL:;;;17825,00
010943530369;98;83;00;;BRETSCHNEIDER, MONIKA:;;;20309,36
040668409819;18;31;00;;BRETSCHNEIDER, NICO:;;;9825,00
120257520010;97;22;00;;BRETSCHNEIDER, REGINA:;;;17448,10
140135422728;12;03;00;;BRETSCHNEIDER, SIEGFRIED:;;;31437,50
031151429783;99;43;00;;BRETSCHNEIDER, THOMAS:;;;23040,00
260165426232;14;00;47;;BRETSCHNEIDER, TORSTEN:;;;18881,00
250366530221;96;15;14;;BRETSCHNEIDER, UTA:;;;12920,00
220570415119;18;31;00;;BRETSCHNEIDER, VOLKER:;;;6705,00
070268406712;05;69;00;;BRETSCHNER, JOERG:;;;9675,00
230559407010;11;18;00;;BRETTIN, BODO:;;;20189,00
300156517718;99;02;00;;BRETTIN, PETRA:;;;20137,98
240954429710;94;94;00;;BRETTIN, RALF:;;;29670,00
050358407016;05;08;00;;BRETTIN, UWE:;;;20240,00
020951409314;06;00;45;;BRETTSCHNEIDER, GU(E)NTER:;;;21065,00
301146422410;12;00;47;;BRETTSCHNEIDER, HANS:;;;21812,50
050543427916;30;34;00;;BRETTSCHNEIDER, RAINER:;;;23200,00
121053406413;18;80;00;;BRETZKE, KLAUS-DIETER:;;;19980,00
101135429717;15;08;00;;BREU, DIETER:;;;27187,50
070369503212;03;09;00;;BREU, KERSTIN:;;;13000,00
050242429731;98;18;00;;BREUCKER, PETER:;;;30750,00
270869430044;18;32;00;;BREUCKER, TORSTEN:;;;9510,00
030334429722;97;08;00;;BREUDEL, GUENTER:;;;28500,00
271063406410;04;00;42;;BREUER, ANDREAS:;;;16227,00
131068430044;99;02;00;;BREUER, CARSTEN:;;;14475,00
160244429724;99;40;00;;BREUER, FRANK:;;;40312,50
240352429799;97;01;00;;BREUER, HARTMUT:;;;21700,00
310838408219;06;00;42;;BREUER, HEINZ:;;;26875,00
120641429713;97;17;00;;BREUER, HEINZ:;;;28500,00
050167421712;99;12;00;;BREUER, JAN:;;;15606,00
050458420330;97;08;00;;BREUER, JUERGEN:;;;17940,00
070665408228;99;43;00;;BREUER, KLAUS:;;;15463,50
191147419614;11;03;00;;BREUER, LOTHAR:;;;26875,02
250461421728;99;43;00;;BREUER, MARIO:;;;17820,00
280959411815;04;06;00;;BREUER, REINER:;;;19952,50
150465430236;98;83;00;;BREUER, RONALD:;;;16623,00
140431429721;98;83;00;;BREUER, WALTER:;;;21750,00
031048405310;04;00;45;;BREUHAHN, JOACHIM:;;;23760,00
150554504823;04;00;45;;BREUHAHN, SIGRID:;;;18912,82
080643429756;97;06;00;;BREUL, BERND:;;;24000,00
270768411928;18;33;00;;BREUM, JO(E)RG:;;;10575,00
210369408313;18;32;00;;BREUNINGER, JO(E)RG:;;;9675,00
150953426519;14;51;00;;BREY, WOLFGANG:;;;29111,62
260747517716;09;06;00;;BREYER, ILONA:;;;22000,00
041242429737;99;43;00;;BREYER, JUERGEN:;;;21750,00
140546417720;09;09;00;;BREYER, LOTHAR:;;;33187,50
250735430067;96;15;05;;BREYER, LOTHAR:;;;28500,00
190539529711;96;15;12;;BREYER, MONIKA:;;;24155,65
191052429799;99;43;00;;BREYER, ULRICH:;;;24480,00
240251417166;09;51;00;;BREYER, WILFRID:;;;21240,00
160968411212;18;33;00;;BREYMANN, NICO:;;;9600,00
171234405319;04;00;49;;BREYVOGEL, OTTMAR:;;;19560,48
300829407522;05;00;40;;BREZINSKI, HORST:;;;27000,00
221149402722;02;00;45;;BREZMANN, GERHARD:;;;23402,50
040142429786;98;50;00;;BRIEBSCH, EBERHARD:;;;37500,00
230461430247;94;03;00;;BRIEBSCH, ERIK:;;;17160,00
110169430075;98;84;00;;BRIEBSCH, RONALD:;;;14425,00
091061419033;10;08;00;;BRIEGER, ANDREE:;;;17820,00
280755406715;97;22;00;;BRIEGER, KLAUS-DIETER:;;;27700,00
251157528226;99;13;00;;BRIEGER, MARGITTA:;;;17531,75
280257427126;99;13;00;;BRIEGER, STEPHAN:;;;21390,00
261261430092;98;85;00;;BRIEN, JOERG:;;;17820,00
071259430061;97;08;00;;BRIEN, MICHAEL:;;;21026,52
160862530221;97;08;00;;BRIEN, UTE:;;;16169,10
140534429732;99;43;00;;BRIEN, WERNER:;;;27750,00
050747430068;30;58;00;;BRIER, ARMIN:;;;17760,48
280346425018;13;00;40;;BRIER, KARL-HEINZ:;;;33187,50
240266422814;60;90;00;;BRIER, ROLAND:;;;
240266422814;60;90;00;;BRIER, ROLAND:;;;15732,00
211148530117;30;84;00;;BRIER, SIGRID:;;;16560,00
170954424046;30;47;00;;BRIESE, ANDREAS:;;;18758,67
010158424034;30;32;00;;BRIESE, HOLGER:;;;13923,15
190869410414;07;18;00;;BRIESE, JENS:;;;8300,00
200956403710;30;58;00;;BRIESE, JUERGEN:;;;16934,00
141149400217;01;80;00;;BRIESE, JUERGEN:;;;22320,00
250861506114;03;15;00;;BRIESE, KAREN:;;;16665,00
280259530012;30;80;00;;BRIESE, PETRA:;;;3182,90
020952529748;30;76;00;;BRIESE, SIGRID:;;;9465,64
040351408316;06;60;00;;BRIESEMANN, BERND:;;;20182,50
070668408311;97;01;00;;BRIESEMANN, DIRK:;;;8812,50
080456500027;99;40;00;;BRIESEMEISTER, EIKE:;;;18329,19
250656400847;18;32;00;;BRIESEMEISTER, HARALD:;;;29670,00
010345408013;18;33;00;;BRIESEMEISTER, KLAUS:;;;23040,00
240956506134;30;47;00;;BRIESENICK, ILONA:;;;20233,50
110659404013;03;11;00;;BRIESKORN, BERND:;;;19320,00
220363406412;04;14;00;;BRIESKORN, RENE:;;;16170,00
180341406418;04;00;42;;BRIESKORN, WOLFGANG:;;;29250,00
240639417760;09;00;40;;BRIESNER, GERD:;;;30000,00
131142517712;09;60;00;;BRIESNER, RENATE:;;;20750,00
150433405714;04;00;52;;BRIEST, FRITZ:;;;18250,00
250969425068;18;35;00;;BRIEST, HANS-JOERG:;;;10287,08
090860403156;30;62;00;;BRIETZKE, PETER:;;;15251,00
160351429762;30;55;00;;BRILLAT, BERND:;;;3600,00
050752404411;99;12;00;;BRINCKMANN, UWE:;;;21395,00
080659530023;96;15;11;;BRINGER, GABRIELE:;;;17808,29
150358430070;99;26;00;;BRINGER, KLAUS-DIETER:;;;19745,00
261059430013;96;15;14;;BRINGEZU, MARIO:;;;21562,50
010446430041;96;15;07;;BRINGMANN, MATTHIAS:;;;29520,00
200832406928;30;50;00;;BRINGMANN, OTTO:;;;18720,00
070455415315;08;80;00;;BRINK, MATTHIAS:;;;17940,00
270144421327;97;06;00;;BRINKE, FRANK:;;;24000,00
150253510015;07;06;00;;BRINKE, HELGA:;;;20104,00
251232400821;97;01;00;;BRINKEL, GEORG:;;;25687,50
101269400848;01;06;20;;BRINKHOFF, FRANK:;;;12650,00
060161420312;09;03;00;;BRINKMANN, ANDREAS:;;;19277,50
030562430231;98;83;00;;BRINKMANN, BERND:;;;18397,50
040144429747;99;43;00;;BRINKMANN, DETLEF:;;;27750,00
020842429738;98;82;00;;BRINKMANN, GERHARD:;;;17398,39
300751429755;94;03;00;;BRINKMANN, HANS-JOERG:;;;20870,00
110958402747;18;71;25;;BRINKMANN, JOERG:;;;20182,50
080654403244;18;71;10;;BRINKMANN, LOTHAR:;;;20160,00
270371415744;18;33;00;;BRINKMANN, MARKO:;;;2795,00
250251400216;01;06;27;;BRINKMANN, MARTIN:;;;19740,00
110567530143;99;53;00;;BRINKMANN, PETRA:;;;16470,00
240652529812;99;53;00;;BRINKMANN, REGINA:;;;26634,82
010441530051;98;83;00;;BRINKMANN, RUTH:;;;19440,00
311230530018;99;09;00;;BRINKMANN, SIEGLINDE:;;;23250,00
110230430016;97;01;00;;BRINKMANN, WILLY:;;;24750,00
190160409221;99;43;00;;BRITZE, FRANK:;;;21332,50
250166409224;99;43;00;;BRITZE, STEFFEN:;;;16038,00
140858411811;05;00;43;;BRIX, ERHARD:;;;21780,00
180966406119;17;00;00;;BRIX, THORSTEN:;;;9872,00
111253414734;99;14;00;;BRIXEL, HEINZ:;;;27360,00
260755503736;99;09;00;;BRIXEL, SIGRID:;;;17860,29
180965404138;99;14;00;;BRO(E)CKER, FRED:;;;11169,00
090670404422;18;32;00;;BRO(E)CKER, JO(E)RG:;;;2795,00
150466513922;18;80;00;;BRO(E)CKERT, ANNETTE:;;;15660,00
220969413123;18;31;00;;BRO(E)DEL, HOLGER:;;;9510,00
030863424927;08;80;00;;BRO(E)DEL, STEFFEN:;;;15294,59
230263424938;07;06;00;;BRO(E)DNER, KARSTEN:;;;17820,00
140467413967;99;55;00;;BRO(E)MEL, STEFFEN:;;;16092,00
150670406411;18;35;00;;BRO(E)SECKE, ANDRE:;;;6705,00
261154417757;09;20;00;;BROAETER, HANS-JUERGEN:;;;23312,50
031137429736;99;09;00;;BROCK, DIETER:;;;28500,00
270230506917;99;43;00;;BROCK, GISELA:;;;20625,00
160559412222;01;03;00;;BROCK, HOLGER:;;;17997,50
101053406917;99;43;00;;BROCK, KLAUS-DIETER:;;;19440,00
050758410847;94;03;00;;BROCK, REINER:;;;21390,00
120470422743;18;33;00;;BROCK, STEFFEN:;;;9986,44
190733514513;08;96;00;;BROCKE, ANITA:;;;17460,00
111038517749;09;14;00;;BROCKE, MARGARETE:;;;18572,50
290168406445;17;00;00;;BROCKE, TOM:;;;8950,00
150756417744;97;01;00;;BROCKE, UDO:;;;25530,00
030358517719;09;07;00;;BROCKE, VERA:;;;17223,17
080271412119;18;33;00;;BROCKEL, ANDREAS:;;;2795,00
121268400852;18;35;00;;BROCKHAUSEN, JENS:;;;9327,00
081068402112;02;69;00;;BROCKHOFF, PETER:;;;9875,00
241155402428;02;00;47;;BROCKMANN, BERND:;;;22770,00
270257411926;07;00;57;;BROCKMANN, HELMUT:;;;15525,00
030550405012;04;08;00;;BROCKMANN, JOACHIM:;;;22500,00
041162400619;30;61;00;;BROCKMANN, JOERG:;;;14355,00
290962420914;12;00;44;;BROCKMANN, OLAF:;;;13932,00
260237400884;01;06;23;;BROCKMANN, WINFRIED:;;;24000,00
250259408538;97;08;00;;BROCKSCH, ULLRICH:;;;22080,00
310538522722;12;08;00;;BROD, MARGA:;;;17940,00
110959411442;07;00;53;;BRODA, MARIO:;;;22770,00
170948430060;15;08;00;;BRODDA, WILFRIED:;;;23760,00
290948522762;94;30;00;;BRODE, CHRISTINE:;;;20640,00
141062423918;99;43;00;;BRODE, DETLEF:;;;17600,00
101248429748;94;30;00;;BRODE, HARTMUT:;;;22770,00
171067430065;94;30;00;;BRODE, STEPHAN:;;;8950,00
010953402723;02;03;00;;BRODEHL, PETER:;;;24480,00
130841429725;97;08;00;;BRODEHL, ROLF-WERNER:;;;26250,00
250338529717;96;15;10;;BRODEHL, SIEGRID:;;;21937,50
110568430144;99;02;00;;BRODEHL, UWE:;;;14994,00
120754410111;94;03;00;;BRODIEN, GERNOT:;;;20010,00
260168412266;18;32;00;;BRODMANN, DIRK:;;;10621,77
071250520052;30;37;00;;BRODOWSKI, BIANKA:;;;16686,00
240868408542;06;00;46;;BRODOWSKI, THOMAS:;;;12825,00
310147420016;30;37;00;;BRODOWSKI, WOLFRAM:;;;20160,00
130129420313;11;00;40;;BRODRECHT, GERHARD:;;;23250,00
030542419617;11;51;00;;BRODRECHT, JUERGEN:;;;21000,00
181148428927;97;01;00;;BROECKEL, KLAUS:;;;23040,00
200968430097;15;80;00;;BROECKER, RAINER:;;;14750,00
120344429717;97;08;00;;BROECKER, ULRICH:;;;25500,00
240451430058;98;84;00;;BROEDE, WOLFGANG:;;;20100,00
260568413954;99;43;00;;BROEDEL, JOERG:;;;13500,00
040566513922;08;19;00;;BROEDEL, PETRA:;;;13179,42
120252424214;99;02;00;;BROEDNER, INGO:;;;26547,50
020761428119;14;80;00;;BROEDNER, LUTZ:;;;16472,50
311056428113;99;13;00;;BROEDNER, NORBERT:;;;19665,00
010564430085;18;29;30;;BROEGE, AXEL:;;;11220,00
020338430094;18;71;20;;BROEGE, WOLFGANG:;;;24150,00
190166409919;07;00;50;;BROEHL, THOMAS:;;;14812,50
130440411110;07;00;51;;BROEKER, ROLF:;;;29250,00
191057413980;08;20;00;;BROEMEL, INGOLF:;;;23205,00
081268419330;05;69;00;;BROEMEL, SILVIO:;;;9675,00
080357430115;98;18;00;;BROEMME, ANDREAS:;;;26392,50
010230530019;99;02;00;;BROEMME, ILSE:;;;24750,00
060941415426;08;00;40;;BROEMME, JUERGEN:;;;27750,00
051156530141;99;53;00;;BROEMME, MARGRET:;;;21551,13
111231429724;99;09;00;;BROEMME, RUDI:;;;33000,00
190254417513;97;29;00;;BROEMMER, EGBERT:;;;23940,00
070753526339;99;77;00;;BROEMMER, GABRIELE:;;;31680,00
290668415129;08;14;00;;BROEMMLING, DIRK:;;;12130,00
010368402327;97;08;00;;BROER, ANDREAS:;;;15221,00
091030430010;97;08;00;;BROESE, HEINZ:;;;28500,00
270654520720;99;77;00;;BROESE, KARIN:;;;22770,00
241231530051;97;06;00;;BROESE, MARGARETE:;;;21375,00
190848411514;07;06;00;;BROESEL, GUENTER:;;;20562,50
020653511222;07;80;00;;BROESEL, HELGA:;;;18000,00
031233505110;30;54;00;;BROESICKE, JOHANNA:;;;22680,00
091036405115;30;54;00;;BROESICKE, WOLFGANG:;;;26700,00
161139429719;99;43;00;;BROETZMANN, HANS-JOACHIM:;;;23187,50
190241406110;17;00;00;;BROHMANN, WILLI:;;;20700,00
040548402719;02;00;49;;BROMBACH, GUENTER:;;;24375,00
110537400823;01;55;00;;BROMBERG, FRITZ:;;;22500,00
051060408424;97;29;00;;BROMBERG, JOERG:;;;24062,90
220867404218;03;00;44;;BROMBERG, MAIK:;;;13982,00
100247424617;99;02;00;;BROMME, HANS-WERNER:;;;27360,00
241068423618;99;43;00;;BROMME, JOERG:;;;9825,00
240452424610;14;80;00;;BROMME, KARL-HEINZ:;;;14372,13
201132430032;15;20;00;;BRONDER, MANFRED:;;;37500,00
220939530054;15;00;41;;BRONDER, MARLIS:;;;23937,50
170170421314;18;35;00;;BRONDER, TIMO:;;;9600,00
280168409815;07;08;00;;BRONESKE, HARALD:;;;11758,00
260959404115;99;43;00;;BRONEWSKI, WERNER:;;;16830,00
050459422792;12;06;00;;BRONNER, UWE:;;;19780,00
220769418915;10;06;00;;BRONST, THOMAS:;;;12555,00
190645411522;07;06;00;;BROSCH, EDUARD:;;;21687,50
311041429711;99;51;00;;BROSCH, FRITZ:;;;26250,00
250435502719;02;65;00;;BROSCH, HANNA:;;;19500,00
160755402718;02;02;00;;BROSCH, PETER:;;;22080,00
051056430071;99;51;00;;BROSCH, PETER:;;;24725,00
010358430113;99;09;00;;BROSCH, RAINER:;;;22252,50
160169404411;98;85;00;;BROSCHE, FRANK:;;;9675,00
021249413414;13;00;43;;BROSCHE, FRANK:;;;26910,00
180537504415;03;00;40;;BROSCHE, HELENE:;;;16031,25
210566422843;12;65;00;;BROSCHE, KLAUS:;;;14580,00
251232422721;12;60;00;;BROSCHE, RUDOLF:;;;36000,00
040261422771;12;20;00;;BROSCHE, RUDOLF:;;;19745,00
241260530026;94;03;00;;BROSCHIES, MARINA:;;;16847,50
290739408912;06;00;54;;BROSE, GUENTER:;;;29700,00
100657411819;07;00;56;;BROSE, HARALD:;;;22942,50
151058430225;94;11;00;;BROSE, NORBERT:;;;21275,00
210371407619;18;32;00;;BROSE, STEFFEN:;;;2795,00
040171408423;18;32;00;;BROSE, STEFFEN:;;;2795,00
191161403715;03;07;00;;BROSE, UWE:;;;21120,00
161124430012;96;15;14;;BROSE, WALTER:;;;33000,00
180268424838;99;43;00;;BROSGE, SVEN:;;;9600,00
261255412218;94;03;00;;BROSIG, FRANK-ULRICH:;;;20010,00
030661404127;96;15;12;;BROSIG, STEFFEN:;;;20278,79
211069427111;14;69;00;;BROSIG, TORSTEN:;;;12085,00
041149524940;13;20;00;;BROSINSKY, ANGELA:;;;21540,00
231065503736;05;08;00;;BROSINSKY, CORNELIA:;;;7598,31
270968403746;99;43;00;;BROSINSKY, JAN:;;;14425,00
120467403728;05;80;00;;BROSINSKY, RENE:;;;15390,00
250462408525;15;15;00;;BROSIUS, BURKHARD:;;;21450,00
180334429726;99;43;00;;BROSIUS, HERBERT:;;;24750,00
140759406910;94;65;00;;BROSIUS, THOMAS:;;;17745,00
290847529711;99;40;00;;BROSK, BAERBEL:;;;22687,50
010348429725;97;06;00;;BROSK, WOLFGANG:;;;24750,00
240336429748;94;03;00;;BROSKE, HORST:;;;27750,00
221060413628;98;84;00;;BROSOWSKY, HANS-ULRICH:;;;17700,00
050347400812;01;65;00;;BROSTOWSKI, DETLEF:;;;21270,82
230459430088;30;61;00;;BROSY, JOERG:;;;16575,00
310149407616;05;03;00;;BROSZ, GERD:;;;26250,00
190933530067;97;08;00;;BROSZAT, CHRISTEL:;;;19125,00
110632430078;97;08;00;;BROSZAT, HANS-GUENTER:;;;21750,00
140957404844;04;00;50;;BROSZIO, THOMAS:;;;16215,00
230741410814;10;07;00;;BROSZMANN, HARALD:;;;30750,00
101167410324;08;69;00;;BROTHUHN, ULF:;;;6025,00
091236416214;09;00;43;;BROTMEYER, ROLF:;;;28937,50
240270406120;04;18;00;;BROXTERMANN, ANDREAS:;;;2700,00
120747406130;04;41;00;;BROXTERMANN, JUERGEN:;;;31500,00
200443518520;99;40;00;;BROYER, EDELTRAUT:;;;22125,00
010470419328;97;22;00;;BROYER, HEIKO:;;;9930,00
110136418520;95;60;12;;BROYER, KLAUS:;;;33000,00
060670415036;18;33;00;;BRU(E)CKNER, DIRK:;;;9551,61
111270426534;18;35;00;;BRU(E)CKNER, ENRICO:;;;2795,00
130968417334;18;80;00;;BRU(E)CKNER, JENS:;;;9825,00
100169428910;18;33;00;;BRU(E)CKNER, JO(E)RG:;;;2720,00
051035407219;18;25;00;;BRU(E)CKNER, KARL-HEINZ:;;;28687,50
141161419711;11;00;41;;BRU(E)CKNER, KLAUS:;;;15510,00
211062407513;04;00;54;;BRU(E)CKNER, STEFFEN:;;;21065,00
220571403320;18;33;00;;BRU(E)CKNER, STEFFEN:;;;2795,00
060968429246;18;32;00;;BRU(E)CKNER, SVEN:;;;9675,00
261168428916;18;32;00;;BRU(E)CKNER, TINO:;;;10025,00
220968424920;18;31;00;;BRU(E)DGAM, HENRY:;;;9600,00
090368406160;18;31;00;;BRU(E)GGEMANN, GERRIT:;;;9825,00
190770430634;18;31;00;;BRU(E)HL, JENS:;;;2795,00
110663402715;96;15;00;4361/84, M:;BRU(E)NING, FALK;1095;WARNEMU(E)NDER STR. 16;
110663402715;96;15;00;4361/84, M:;BRU(E)NING, FALK;1095;WARNEMU(E)NDER STR. 16;
141270427518;18;32;00;;BRU(E)NING, STEFAN:;;;2795,00
230668415036;18;34;00;;BRU(E)SCHKE, JENS:;;;10375,00
250955429738;30;47;00;;BRUCH, PETER:;;;23805,00
021061402123;02;08;00;;BRUCHE, DIETMAR:;;;18590,00
270859402111;02;26;00;;BRUCHE, JUERGEN:;;;20010,00
130362501718;02;26;00;;BRUCHE, PETRA:;;;10687,34
130970427347;18;40;00;;BRUCHHOLD, LUTZ:;;;6736,77
200655422723;12;26;00;;BRUCHHOLZ, HANS-PETER:;;;20412,50
280152403814;12;00;58;;BRUCHMANN, DETLEF:;;;23460,00
270752421814;12;41;00;;BRUCHMANN, FRANK:;;;31680,00
210538429722;97;06;00;;BRUCHMANN, PETER:;;;27125,00
070353518516;12;08;00;;BRUCHMANN, WALTRAUD:;;;2300,00
230662530084;99;77;00;;BRUCHMUELLER, HEIKE:;;;14594,95
040162414741;99;14;00;;BRUCHMUELLER, UWE:;;;20401,34
260556409915;95;60;24;;BRUCKE, ANDRE:;;;25600,00
050371431117;18;33;00;;BRUCKELT, STEFAN:;;;2795,00
180552506929;99;43;00;;BRUCKER, URSULA:;;;9987,75
091134429719;97;06;00;;BRUCKERT, ARTUR:;;;27595,84
300564410119;96;15;26;;BRUCKERT, TORSTEN:;;;16912,50
100662403629;99;02;00;;BRUCKHOFF, FRANK:;;;19085,00
060633403618;03;00;45;;BRUCKHOFF, HERBERT:;;;26250,00
090570400715;99;77;00;;BRUCKHOFF, MARIO:;;;2915,97
230465503116;03;80;00;;BRUCKSCH, CORINNA:;;;10611,40
120456522123;12;00;43;;BRUCKSCH, MARTINA:;;;5528,21
200340422112;12;00;54;;BRUCKSCH, WERNER:;;;27000,00
190737403116;03;00;50;;BRUCKSCH, WOLF-DIETER:;;;36000,00
060550413917;08;08;00;;BRUDER, KLAUS-DIETER:;;;18450,00
211033430052;18;27;30;;BRUDER, SIEGFRIED:;;;27000,00
051034529716;96;15;11;;BRUDER, SIGRID:;;;21937,50
041131403825;03;02;00;;BRUDNICKI, BRUNO:;;;17666,66
090370403823;97;06;00;;BRUDNICKI, DIRK:;;;9600,00
010268412237;07;06;00;;BRUDNICKI, JENS:;;;11600,00
100166417730;09;00;40;;BRUECK, JENS:;;;18764,40
091068420010;09;69;00;;BRUECK, STEFFEN:;;;9700,00
011243530055;30;47;00;;BRUECKHAENDLER, GITTA:;;;24140,00
070651507524;05;06;00;;BRUECKL, HANNELORE:;;;20040,00
170142507540;05;29;00;;BRUECKL, INGRID:;;;22500,00
121041407515;05;00;50;;BRUECKL, UWE:;;;25500,00
250264415126;97;01;00;;BRUECKMANN, HARTMUT:;;;10560,00
100163417719;94;03;00;;BRUECKMANN, MARIO:;;;18480,00
040362506915;99;77;00;;BRUECKMANN, STEFFI:;;;17796,11
020854421813;12;40;00;;BRUECKNER, ANDREAS:;;;22165,00
100268426814;99;02;00;;BRUECKNER, ANDREAS:;;;9872,00
290359506924;05;80;00;;BRUECKNER, BAERBEL:;;;17250,00
280852418419;97;01;00;;BRUECKNER, BERND:;;;31520,04
061148411926;99;43;00;;BRUECKNER, BERND:;;;27000,00
140240507213;18;29;00;;BRUECKNER, BRIGITTE:;;;19440,00
100250408538;97;22;00;;BRUECKNER, CHRISTIAN:;;;25500,00
061260530116;96;15;12;;BRUECKNER, DANIELA:;;;13895,95
091066426611;14;69;00;;BRUECKNER, DANIELO:;;;13860,00
150445421025;04;06;00;;BRUECKNER, DIETMAR:;;;23250,00
210869407317;99;43;00;;BRUECKNER, FRANK:;;;8350,00
231257422789;99;40;00;;BRUECKNER, FRANK:;;;22770,00
070260418516;94;03;00;;BRUECKNER, FRANK:;;;21562,50
261157419715;97;22;00;;BRUECKNER, GEORG:;;;24840,00
060552429218;01;80;00;;BRUECKNER, GUNTER:;;;18720,00
260642513612;99;40;00;;BRUECKNER, HANNELORE:;;;26815,00
110337520310;11;77;00;;BRUECKNER, HELLA:;;;25500,00
291252412228;07;08;00;;BRUECKNER, HENNING:;;;22320,00
070450411710;98;84;00;;BRUECKNER, HERBERT:;;;21532,50
071049515024;08;78;00;;BRUECKNER, ISABELLA:;;;20880,00
220165427415;99;43;00;;BRUECKNER, JENS:;;;16830,00
280747415013;08;64;00;;BRUECKNER, JOACHIM:;;;24750,00
220767419711;17;00;00;;BRUECKNER, JOERG:;;;8950,00
101046512914;18;96;00;;BRUECKNER, KAROLA:;;;19262,50
180653402715;02;00;48;;BRUECKNER, KLAUS:;;;25200,00
230267408927;06;69;00;;BRUECKNER, LARS:;;;11016,00
190333429715;99;53;00;;BRUECKNER, LOTHAR:;;;32062,50
010254418515;10;11;00;;BRUECKNER, LUTZ:;;;26640,00
071055422238;96;15;21;;BRUECKNER, LUTZ:;;;21822,50
120127418413;97;01;00;;BRUECKNER, MANFRED:;;;33500,04
021146421825;12;08;00;;BRUECKNER, MANFRED:;;;27000,00
050669415355;01;69;00;;BRUECKNER, MARCO:;;;6806,61
030635429726;97;06;00;;BRUECKNER, MARTIN:;;;23000,00
210657407438;18;29;00;;BRUECKNER, MATTHIAS:;;;24092,50
071156417745;99;55;00;;BRUECKNER, MICHAEL:;;;19435,00
151070413444;97;22;00;;BRUECKNER, MICHAEL:;;;3772,33
120753417792;09;12;00;;BRUECKNER, MICHAEL:;;;23220,00
220753428027;12;06;00;;BRUECKNER, PETER:;;;19040,00
151060501328;30;81;00;;BRUECKNER, RAMONA:;;;11491,54
011239413614;99;40;00;;BRUECKNER, ROBERT:;;;27000,00
140332420318;11;06;00;;BRUECKNER, ROLAND:;;;26250,00
141255429742;30;47;00;;BRUECKNER, ROLAND:;;;24942,50
210257417717;99;13;00;;BRUECKNER, RUEDIGER:;;;21045,00
130236530323;98;83;00;;BRUECKNER, RUTH:;;;18360,00
270939407211;94;03;00;;BRUECKNER, SIEGFRIED:;;;27750,00
061269419748;97;06;00;;BRUECKNER, STEFAN:;;;15150,00
070455403410;97;01;00;;BRUECKNER, STEFFEN:;;;25290,00
190270418428;99;43;00;;BRUECKNER, STEFFEN:;;;6780,00
230470419752;11;69;00;;BRUECKNER, STEPHAN:;;;2720,00
200369426512;14;69;00;;BRUECKNER, SVEN:;;;12675,00
011268415328;18;35;00;;BRUECKNER, SVEN:;;;10725,00
090468430125;99;77;00;;BRUECKNER, THOMAS:;;;9872,00
230464412300;97;01;00;;BRUECKNER, TINO:;;;16775,00
180571419644;99;43;00;;BRUECKNER, TORSTEN:;;;2870,00
241266400628;98;82;00;;BRUECKNER, VOLKER:;;;14946,00
050930407448;99;02;00;;BRUECKNER, WILLY:;;;42375,00
101164415330;08;08;00;;BRUEDER, MICHAEL:;;;16753,50
070945427714;13;51;00;;BRUEDERLEIN, BERND:;;;27000,00
150452506414;97;01;00;;BRUEGERT, CHRISTIANE:;;;18682,88
150354401328;04;43;00;;BRUEGERT, DETLEF:;;;21600,00
190951411256;98;20;00;;BRUEGGEMANN, DETLEF:;;;25080,00
021057408557;94;03;00;;BRUEGGEMANN, STEFFEN:;;;21332,50
300647406115;30;40;00;;BRUEGGENKAMP, DETLEV:;;;23320,00
200540403610;03;65;00;;BRUEGGER, SIEGFRIED:;;;22437,50
280658403416;99;55;00;;BRUEGGERT, HANS-JUERGEN:;;;18083,75
031254401919;02;00;43;;BRUEGGERT, RAINER:;;;22080,00
080966402726;94;03;00;;BRUEGGMANN, CAROL:;;;15498,00
050244502728;02;18;00;;BRUEGGMANN, EDELTRAUD:;;;17167,77
010236402712;02;02;00;;BRUEGGMANN, HARRY:;;;27000,00
280751513230;98;19;00;;BRUEGMANN, GISELA:;;;22030,00
181231429728;99;43;00;;BRUEHL, GERHARD:;;;27750,00
291070421115;99;43;00;;BRUEHL, HEIKO:;;;2480,32
020245521026;98;83;00;;BRUEHL, ILONA:;;;19780,00
240643421025;98;20;00;;BRUEHL, JUERGEN:;;;25920,00
131153427210;97;22;00;;BRUEHL, JUERGEN:;;;20880,00
121235429747;99;77;00;;BRUEHL, KURT:;;;20316,53
190657430050;94;03;00;;BRUEHL, MARIO:;;;21332,50
101257506127;99;77;00;;BRUEHL, MARTINA:;;;19043,66
290145429732;97;01;00;;BRUEHL, PETER:;;;30750,00
081239412228;07;78;00;;BRUEHL, PETER:;;;33750,00
130158406182;99;02;00;;BRUEHL, UWE:;;;25875,00
200834429736;98;83;00;;BRUEHL, WALTER:;;;23250,00
261264412914;94;03;00;;BRUEHMANN, PETER:;;;17050,00
151055403627;15;00;43;;BRUEHNING, ERHARD:;;;24092,50
310553406420;08;20;00;;BRUEMMER, HANS-JOACHIM:;;;22080,00
270960413624;96;15;10;;BRUENECKE, FRANK:;;;19305,00
171254512226;07;78;00;;BRUENING, BIRGIT:;;;17464,92
210532430044;13;99;01;;BRUENING, CLAUS:;;;42750,00
060468400615;01;00;49;;BRUENING, DIRK:;;;13785,00
250447411910;07;19;00;;BRUENING, GERHARD:;;;27000,00
141048507410;98;20;00;;BRUENING, HEIDEMARIE:;;;19993,63
230568406116;04;69;00;;BRUENING, HEIKO:;;;9875,00
180448401828;02;19;00;;BRUENING, HEINZ:;;;25875,00
081253407417;99;43;00;;BRUENING, JUERGEN:;;;25860,00
090941402219;02;08;00;;BRUENING, KLAUS:;;;19718,75
090463427736;30;59;00;;BRUENING, RALPH:;;;15180,00
231046411414;94;30;00;;BRUENING, REINHARD:;;;26562,50
251270400638;98;18;00;;BRUENING, ULF:;;;2700,00
050266400896;01;18;00;;BRUENKMANN, UWE:;;;15974,00
070851427019;14;22;00;;BRUENLER, HARRY:;;;23040,00
121169418328;94;30;00;;BRUENNER, DIRK:;;;2700,00
061146418315;10;00;45;;BRUENNER, HANS-DIETER:;;;24480,00
081244500724;30;81;00;;BRUENNER, RENATE:;;;16200,00
140139505918;97;06;00;;BRUESEHABER, GERDA:;;;22320,00
160942405914;99;40;00;;BRUESEHABER, GUENTER:;;;27750,00
250966400893;18;41;30;;BRUESEHABER, JAN:;;;14168,00
081050403416;03;20;00;;BRUESER, BODO:;;;22892,50
070641428929;97;06;00;;BRUESEWITZ, PETER:;;;24000,00
210961406747;98;85;00;;BRUESKE, HANS-JUERGEN:;;;18480,00
211051429741;30;62;00;;BRUESSAU, MICHAEL:;;;15903,75
261142506111;17;00;00;;BRUESSEL, HEIDI:;;;21000,00
280858428124;14;00;60;;BRUESSEL, ULLRICH:;;;12161,25
300154400022;01;55;00;;BRUESSOW, BERNHARD:;;;16867,50
020366515351;97;01;00;;BRUESSOW, GRIT:;;;13217,31
100950409910;95;45;00;;BRUESSOW, KLAUS:;;;26460,00
041262400712;97;01;00;;BRUESSOW, MARIO:;;;16038,00
240652400517;01;19;00;;BRUEST, HANS-JOACHIM:;;;21620,00
150469403729;18;32;00;;BRUGGER, THOMAS:;;;9313,50
031048402419;18;80;00;;BRUHN, DIETER:;;;20812,50
040747417120;09;26;00;;BRUHN, HEINZ-JUERGEN:;;;26437,50
270247401812;02;00;42;;BRUHN, ROLF:;;;30750,00
281150401318;96;15;00;650/75/39, :;BRUHN, SIEGFRIED;2520;ALEKSIS-KIVI-STR. 29;
281150401318;96;15;00;650/75/39, :;BRUHN, SIEGFRIED;2520;ALEKSIS-KIVI-STR. 29;
061068414713;94;03;00;;BRUHN, TORSTEN:;;;13175,00
200250400817;01;00;40;;BRUHN, WOLFGANG:;;;25500,00
060353406128;04;06;00;;BRUHNS, ULF-PETER:;;;20711,62
240664403627;03;14;00;;BRUKSCH, ANDREAS:;;;15840,00
130768413726;18;35;00;;BRUMBY, MAIK:;;;9675,00
290942530032;99;77;00;;BRUMM, DORIS:;;;27000,00
060440422740;12;00;40;;BRUMM, GERHARD:;;;26250,00
250369430074;17;00;00;;BRUMM, HOLGER:;;;8950,00
011158405110;15;80;00;;BRUMM, JUERGEN:;;;18227,50
210560400870;01;06;25;;BRUMM, NORBERT:;;;17680,00
180155418618;94;03;00;;BRUMME, KLAUS-PETER:;;;22647,50
300562416226;09;06;00;;BRUMMER, HEIKO:;;;17380,00
010268403218;03;69;00;;BRUMMUND, DIRK:;;;10575,00
020135402739;02;53;00;;BRUMMUND, EGON:;;;27375,00
250863402749;99;02;00;;BRUMMUND, JU(E)RGEN:;;;19415,00
290862402727;94;30;00;;BRUMMUND, MICHAEL:;;;17847,50
081268430038;99;43;00;;BRUNA, ANDREAS:;;;13575,00
140147530064;99;43;00;;BRUNA, GUDRUN:;;;20706,00
230844429729;99;43;00;;BRUNA, WOLFGANG:;;;27750,00
160359522224;98;83;00;;BRUNK, BIRGIT:;;;17585,39
010253429749;15;20;00;;BRUNK, ECKART:;;;23715,00
280955401310;97;17;00;;BRUNK, HEINZ:;;;20010,00
020969404415;94;03;00;;BRUNK, KARSTEN:;;;9510,00
180349401320;98;82;00;;BRUNK, KLAUS-DIETER:;;;24337,50
190559403841;03;80;00;;BRUNK, KLAUS-DIETER:;;;16675,00
190847403715;97;08;00;;BRUNK, MANFRED:;;;27000,00
140253403720;03;14;00;;BRUNK, REINHARD:;;;18480,00
210360524940;30;63;00;;BRUNKAL, ELKE:;;;10916,33
280355425052;30;63;00;;BRUNKAL, KARL-HEINZ:;;;15510,00
210370429752;94;03;00;;BRUNKOW, BIRK:;;;2700,00
190342429733;99;26;00;;BRUNKOW, HANS-PETER:;;;39750,00
010240529716;98;20;00;;BRUNKOW, INGRID:;;;23125,00
050150406428;04;00;42;;BRUNKOW, KLAUS:;;;25860,00
020560508913;30;84;00;;BRUNN, DANIELA:;;;12738,97
280550413428;30;63;00;;BRUNN, HELMUT:;;;17280,00
031239430092;15;06;00;;BRUNN, LOTHAR:;;;26250,00
300155515315;99;40;00;;BRUNNE, PETRA:;;;20842,50
280954423825;99;40;00;;BRUNNE, RALF:;;;23400,00
210163400893;97;01;00;;BRUNNENMEIER, STEFFEN:;;;16335,00
270259422717;12;08;00;;BRUNNER, ANDREAS:;;;19952,50
231244530078;99;12;00;;BRUNNER, ANKE:;;;21600,00
220260406129;04;06;00;;BRUNNER, AXEL:;;;19665,00
071055529836;96;15;04;;BRUNNER, CARMEN:;;;19492,50
010553501829;02;03;00;;BRUNNER, CHRISTA:;;;11757,08
010247411518;07;00;54;;BRUNNER, DIETER:;;;27937,50
021047410418;02;00;42;;BRUNNER, DIETER:;;;22500,00
020366430024;98;27;00;;BRUNNER, DIRK:;;;15876,00
260238418410;97;06;00;;BRUNNER, GOTTFRIED:;;;21266,66
070847422725;12;00;47;;BRUNNER, HANS-JUERGEN:;;;25117,50
010951429818;97;08;00;;BRUNNER, HEINZ:;;;18942,50
070369428224;18;38;00;;BRUNNER, INGO:;;;9675,00
120765430214;96;15;25;;BRUNNER, JAN:;;;19150,50
210169427229;18;33;00;;BRUNNER, JENS:;;;10500,00
061152428210;14;15;00;;BRUNNER, JUERGEN:;;;24832,50
030239429724;99;09;00;;BRUNNER, KLAUS:;;;29250,00
260429430017;96;15;00;1920/75, J:;BRUNNER, MANFRED;1144;TETEROWER RING 86;
260429430017;96;15;00;1920/75, J:;BRUNNER, MANFRED;1144;TETEROWER RING 86;
050170429352;94;03;00;;BRUNNER, MARKO:;;;10335,00
040438430233;60;90;00;;BRUNNER, THEO:;;;
040438430233;60;90;00;;BRUNNER, THEO:;;;30600,00
010766420125;11;69;00;;BRUNNER, TORSTEN:;;;15876,00
190942405233;03;18;00;;BRUNNER, WERNER:;;;27000,00
280736414218;08;00;54;;BRUNNERT, HILMAR:;;;23343,01
260639410815;07;06;00;;BRUNNERT, JUERGEN:;;;24187,50
070670409823;18;33;00;;BRUNNGRA(E)BER, MAREK:;;;6958,87
240369410023;18;31;00;;BRUNOW, RALF:;;;9675,00
050662522799;96;15;00;6555/82, J:;BRUNS, BEATE;1140;BA(E)RENSTEINSTR. 8;
050662522799;96;15;00;6555/82, J:;BRUNS, BEATE;1140;BA(E)RENSTEINSTR. 8;
100571409523;05;69;00;;BRUNS, HENRY:;;;2870,00
160858405938;97;08;00;;BRUNS, MICHAEL:;;;18601,25
110570421116;12;69;00;;BRUNS, STEFFEN:;;;9830,00
210951508811;30;83;00;;BRUNS, SYBILLE:;;;20359,55
020348410820;99;55;00;;BRUNS, WALTER:;;;24000,00
031268403632;18;35;00;;BRUNS, WOLFGANG:;;;9675,00
301057413934;97;01;00;;BRUNSCH, JUERGEN:;;;29760,00
240543411110;07;00;51;;BRUNSCH, KLAUS-DIETER:;;;24750,00
150166413911;15;07;00;;BRUNSCH, OLAF:;;;18414,00
020853409812;07;18;00;;BRUNSENDORF, DIETER:;;;24480,00
191154511435;07;41;00;;BRUNSENDORF, GUDRUN:;;;19440,00
300852409825;07;00;41;;BRUNSENDORF, LOTHAR:;;;23460,00
290153402716;02;06;00;;BRUNST, HOLGER:;;;20160,00
060270403714;18;34;00;;BRUNST, STEFAN:;;;6705,00
230358430062;15;80;00;;BRUNTSCH, DETLEF:;;;17935,02
260862407010;18;38;00;;BRUSAK, DIRK:;;;20161,43
070268501568;97;06;00;;BRUSCH, ANNETT:;;;9783,34
151063400119;01;00;45;;BRUSCH, HOLGER:;;;15592,50
050657400113;99;12;00;;BRUSCH, MANFRED:;;;20815,00
051165401528;01;60;00;;BRUSE, DIRK:;;;14835,00
211040501517;01;06;22;;BRUSE, GERDA:;;;16296,30
150646400810;01;65;00;;BRUSE, GERHARD:;;;20625,00
070638403413;03;65;00;;BRUSE, HANS-ULRICH:;;;25687,50
140948401510;97;06;00;;BRUSE, PAUL:;;;24000,00
020741430086;30;84;00;;BRUSENDORF, WOLFGANG:;;;16560,00
100357421716;12;06;00;;BRUSSIG, ROLAND:;;;19492,50
070736421711;12;00;51;;BRUSSIG, SIEGFRIED:;;;16847,50
220260523624;14;00;56;;BRUSSOG, BIRGIT:;;;14948,75
081148529711;94;30;00;;BRUST, MARION:;;;21157,25
021046429715;99;43;00;;BRUST, UDO:;;;26187,50
210137429713;99;02;00;;BRUTKE, RUDOLF:;;;36008,06
011153429746;30;47;00;;BRUTSCHIN, SIEGBERT:;;;23090,00
120140411216;07;08;00;;BRUTTLOFF, HANS-JOACHIM:;;;21750,00
120249430066;30;47;00;;BRYCHCY, MICHAEL:;;;29280,00
091052407014;05;08;00;;BRYKCZYNSKI, JOERG:;;;18749,03
060571512244;07;96;00;;BRYLLA, KERSTIN:;;;3220,00
140250412226;07;06;00;;BRYLLA, KLAUS-DIETER:;;;21720,00
140853412217;07;06;00;;BRYLLA, WOLFGANG:;;;20160,00
180842421827;94;03;00;;BRYLSKI, JUERGEN:;;;24000,00
231269407228;05;69;00;;BRYM, RAINER:;;;2870,00
020858406418;30;58;00;;BRZAKALA, JUERGEN:;;;16445,00
170160413628;06;00;50;;BRZANK, RAINER:;;;19800,00
161250413213;08;00;44;;BRZEZINSKI, JU(E)RGEN:;;;19800,00
130655417528;09;00;51;;BRZEZINSKI, LUTZ:;;;27967,50
200239402731;30;44;00;;BRZEZOWSKA, ALFRED:;;;15120,00
251243412211;07;51;00;;BRZOSKA, INGBERT:;;;21750,00
280542512215;07;40;00;;BRZOSKA, MARGA:;;;26437,50
091056518520;10;51;00;;BRZUSKA, DAGMAR:;;;18917,50
090956407215;05;80;00;;BRZYSKI, BODO:;;;16905,00
040743530388;18;77;00;;BSDUREK, RENATE:;;;23040,00
BOSTON—A Chinese national in Massachusetts on business was arrested for illegally supplying U.S. origin parts to end-users in China in violation of U.S. export laws.
Qiang Hu, a/k/a Johnson Hu, 47, was charged in a complaint with conspiracy to violate the Export Administration Regulations and the International Emergency Economic Powers Act. The complaint, originally filed on May 18, was unsealed after Hu’s arrest at his hotel in North Andover yesterday.
The complaint alleges that Hu has been the sales manager at MKS Instruments Shanghai Ltd. (MKS-Shanghai) since 2008. MKS-Shanghai is the Shanghai sales office of MKS Instruments Inc. (MKS), which is headquartered in Andover. Hu’s employment gave him access to MKS-manufactured parts, including export-controlled pressure-measuring sensors (manometer types 622B, 623B, 626A, 626B, 627B, 722A, and 722B), which are commonly known as pressure transducers. Pressure transducers are export controlled because they are used in gas centrifuges to enrich uranium and produce weapons-grade uranium.
The complaint alleges that beginning in 2007, Hu and others caused thousands of MKS pressure transducers worth millions of dollars to be exported from the United States and delivered to unauthorized end-users using export licenses that were fraudulently obtained from the U.S. Department of Commerce. The complaint alleges that Hu and his co-conspirators used two primary means of deception to export the pressure transducers. First, the conspirators used licenses issued to legitimate MKS business customers to export the pressure transducers to China and then caused the parts to be delivered to other end-users who were not themselves named on the export licenses or authorized to receive the parts. Second, the conspirators obtained export licenses in the name of a front company and then used these fraudulently obtained licenses to export the parts to China, where they were delivered to the actual end-users.
MKS is not a target of the government’s investigation into these matters.
Hu remains in custody and is scheduled for a detention hearing on May 31 at 11 a.m. If convicted, he faces a maximum sentence of 20 years in federal prison, to be followed by up to three years of supervised release, and a $1 million fine.
United States Attorney Carmen M. Ortiz; Richard DesLauriers, Special Agent in Charge of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Boston Field Office; Bruce M. Foucart, Special Agent in Charge of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s Office of Homeland Security Investigations in Boston; and John J. McKenna, Special Agent in Charge of the U.S. Department of Commerce, Office of Export Enforcement, Boston Field Office made the announcement today. The case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorneys William D. Weinreb and B. Stephanie Siegmann in Ortiz’s Antiterrorism and National Security Unit.
The details contained in the complaint are allegations. The defendant is presumed to be innocent unless and until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law.
WACO, TX—A jury this afternoon in Waco convicted 22-year-old Naser Jason Abdo on federal charges in connection with a July 2011 bomb plot in Killeen, Texas. The conviction was announced by U.S. Attorney Robert Pitman and FBI Special Agent in Charge Armando Fernandez.
The jury convicted Abdo of one count of attempted use of a weapon of mass destruction; one count of attempted murder of officers or employees of the United States; two counts of possession of a firearm in furtherance of a federal crime of violence; and two counts of possession of a destructive device in furtherance of a federal crime of violence.
Testimony presented at trial revealed that on July 27, 2011, Abdo unlawfully attempted to create and detonate a bomb in an attempt to kill, with pre-meditation and malice aforethought, members of the uniformed services of the United States and to shoot survivors of said detonation with a firearm. Evidence further revealed that Abdo did knowingly possess a .40 caliber semiautomatic pistol while carrying out his plot.
“It’s important to note that this plot was interrupted and a potential tragedy prevented because an alert citizen notified law enforcement of suspicious activity, triggering prompt investigation and intervention. While we in law enforcement will be aggressive in investigating and prosecuting people like Mr. Abdo, we depend on the vigilance of the public in helping ensure the safety of the community,” said U.S. Attorney Robert Pitman.
Officers with the Killeen Police Department arrested Abdo on July 27, 2011. At the time of his arrest, the defendant, an absent without leave (AWOL) soldier from Fort Campbell, Kentucky, was in possession of the handgun, plus instructions on how to build a bomb as well as bomb making components. Testimony during the trial revealed that Abdo intended to detonate the destructive device inside an unspecified restaurant frequented by soldiers from Fort Hood.
“This verdict confirms the collective efforts by all of our partners on the FBI’s Joint Terrorism Task Force (JTTF) to address terrorism in any shape or form, whether it be by one or by many,” said FBI Special Agent in Charge Armando Fernandez.
Abdo remains in federal custody. He faces up to life in federal prison for the attempted use of a weapon of mass destruction charge; up to 20 years in federal prison for the attempted murder charge; a mandatory 30 years in prison for each possession of a destructive device in furtherance of a federal crime of violence charge; and a mandatory five years in federal prison for each possession of a firearm in furtherance of a federal crime of violence charge. Sentencing is scheduled for 9:00 a.m. on July 20, 2012 before U.S. District Judge Walter S. Smith.
This case is being investigated by agents with the FBI, together with U.S. Army Criminal Investigation Command; Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives; Killeen Police Department; and the Texas Department of Public Safety.
Assistant U.S. Attorneys Mark Frazier and Gregg Sofer of the Western District of Texas and Trial Attorney Larry Schneider of the Justice Department’s Counterterrorism Section are prosecuting this case on behalf of the government.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vKAevl6hrQk
Plot Summary for
The Two Escobars – [HD] (2010)
Pablo Escobar was the richest, most powerful drug kingpin in the world, ruling the Medellín Cartel with an iron fist. Andres Escobar was the biggest soccer star in Colombia. The two were not related, but their fates were inextricably-and fatally-intertwined. Pablo’s drug money had turned Andres’ national team into South American champions, favored to win the 1994 World Cup in Los Angeles. It was there, in a game against the U.S., that Andres committed one of the most shocking mistakes in soccer history, scoring an “own goal” that eliminated his team from the competition and ultimately cost him his life. The Two Escobars is a riveting examination of the intersection of sports, crime, and politics. For Colombians, soccer was far more than a game: their entire national identity rode on the success or failure of their team. Jeff and Michael Zimbalist’s fast and furious documentary plays out on an ever-expanding canvas, painting a fascinating portrait of Pablo, Andres, and a country in the grips of a violent, escalating civil war. Written by David Ansen, Los Angeles Film Festival
DOWNLOAD THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT HERE
Joseph Dominick Pistone, alias Donnie Brasco, (born September 17, 1939), is a former FBI agent who worked undercover for six years infiltrating the Bonanno crime family and to a lesser extent the Colombo crime family, two of the Five Families of the Mafia in New York City.[1][2] Pistone was an FBI agent for 17 years and is considered to be an FBI legend.[3]
Pistone was a pioneer for deep long-term undercover work. J. Edgar Hoover originally did not want FBI agents to work undercover because it could be a dirty job and might end up tainting the agents, but Pistone’s work helped convince the FBI that using undercover agents instead of just using informants was a crucial tool in law enforcement.
Pistone was born in Erie, Pennsylvania and grew up in Paterson, New Jersey. He graduated from Paterson State College (now William Paterson University) with a B.A. in elementary education social studies in 1965, then worked as a teacher for one year before taking a position at the Office of Naval Intelligence. Pistone joined the FBI in 1969; after serving in a variety of roles, he was transferred to New York in 1974 and assigned to the truck hijacking squad.
His ability to drive 18-wheel trucks and bulldozers led to being chosen for what would become his first undercover operation, infiltrating a gang stealing heavy vehicles and equipment. His penetration of the group led to the arrest of over 30 people along the Eastern Seaboard in February 1976 – described at the time as one of the largest and most profitable theft rings ever broken in America. The name Donald (“Donnie”) Brasco was chosen to be Pistone’s alias.
Pistone was born in Erie, Pennsylvania and grew up in Paterson, New Jersey. He graduated from Paterson State College (now William Paterson University) with a B.A. in elementary education social studies in 1965, then worked as a teacher for one year before taking a position at the Office of Naval Intelligence. Pistone joined the FBI in 1969; after serving in a variety of roles, he was transferred to New York in 1974 and assigned to the truck hijacking squad.
His ability to drive 18-wheel trucks and bulldozers led to being chosen for what would become his first undercover operation, infiltrating a gang stealing heavy vehicles and equipment. His penetration of the group led to the arrest of over 30 people along the Eastern Seaboard in February 1976 – described at the time as one of the largest and most profitable theft rings ever broken in America. The name Donald (“Donnie”) Brasco was chosen to be Pistone’s alias.
[edit]Operation Donnie Brasco (1976–1981)
Pistone was selected to be an undercover agent because he was of Sicilian heritage, was fluent in Italian and was acquainted with the mob from growing up in New Jersey. He also said that he did not perspire under pressure and was aware of the Mafia’s codes of conduct and system. The operation was given the code name “Sun-Apple” after the locations of its two simultaneous operations: Miami (“Sunny Miami”) and New York (“The Big Apple”). After extensive preparation including FBI gemology classes and again using the alias Donnie Brasco, he went undercover as an expert jewel thief.
In September 1976, Pistone walked out of the FBI office and did not return for the next six years. The FBI erased Pistone’s history (making it seem like he never existed) and anyone who called asking for him would be told that no one by that name was employed there. His co-workers, friends and informants had no idea what had happened to him. Pistone stated that it was not the original aim to penetrate the Mafia; rather, the focus was to be on a group of people fencing stolen property from the large number of truck hijackings taking place each day in New York (five to six a day). It was intended that the undercover operation last for around six months.

(U//FOUO) The Denver Division of the FBI is releasing this report to raise the awareness of local and state law enforcement partners and public safety officials about the possible threat of wildfires.
(U//FOUO) Al-Qaida in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP) has released issue 9 of its English-language “Inspire” Magazine. There is a portion of the magazine dedicated to attacking the United States by starting wildfires. The article instructs the audience to look for two necessary factors for a successful wildfire, which are dryness and high winds to help spread the fire. Specific fire conditions that are likely to spread fire quickly are Pinewood, crownfires (where the trees and branches are close together), and steep slope fires (fire spreads faster going up a slope).
(U//FOUO) Inspire magazine lists instructions for igniting a forest fire. The list of required materials include quick inflammable material (1/3 of a liter of gasoline), and a material with slow and long lasting inflammation (foam). The article continues to instruct the reader about how to prepare an ember bomb, which consists of gasoline soaked foam that is ignited by a timer. The article advises the reader to use thirty ember bombs, placed in the tops of trees about a third into the forest, opposite the wind.
(U//FOUO) Throughout Colorado, conditions are favorable for wildfires. Colorado’s forests have been impacted by the mountain pine beetle, and the plains regions are extremely dry. Continuous stands of dead lodgepole pine with dead needles in the crowns (typically lasting 2 to 3 years after a successful fire) will support running crown fires under the right weather conditions.
Doc about henry hill shows what he is doing today and he talks about life in the mob
HOUSTON—Barry Walter Bujol, Jr., a 30-year-old Hempstead, Texas resident and former student at Prairie View A&M University, has been sentenced to serve 20 years in federal prison, U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Texas Kenneth Magidson announced today, along with Lisa Monaco, Assistant Attorney General for National Security. Bujol was convicted November 14, 2011 of attempting to provide material support to al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP), a designated foreign terrorist organization.
Just moments ago, U.S. District Judge David Hittner handed Bujol the statutory maximum sentence, ordering him to serve 180 months in prison for attempting to provide material support to AQAP and 60 months in prison for aggravated identity theft, which will be served consecutively, for a total sentence of 240 months in prison.
“We do not take matters of potential national security lightly,” said U.S. Attorney Magidson. “This case and its successful resolution represents our commitment to making our communities a safer place to live.”
Bujol requested a bench trial before Judge Hittner, which lasted nearly four days, during which he acted as his own attorney. The United States presented a total of 325 trial exhibits and 12 witnesses, which resulted in Bujol’s convictions for both attempt to provide material support or resources to a designated foreign terrorist organization as well as aggravated identity theft.
Evidence revealed Bujol had asked Anwar Al-Aulaqi, a now-deceased Yemeni-American AQAP associate, for advice on raising money for the “mujahideen” without attracting police attention and on his duty as a Muslim to make “violent jihad.” Al-Aulaqi replied by sending Bujol a document entitled “42 Ways of Supporting Jihad,” which asserted that “‘jihad’ is the greatest deed in Islam…[and] obligatory on every Muslim.” Court records indicated the “jihad” Al-Aulaqi advocated involved violence and killing.
In 2009, Bujol made three attempts to depart the United States for the Middle East, but law enforcement, believing these were Bujol’s efforts to make “violent jihad,” thwarted him each time he tried to leave. Bujol eventually told a confidential source he desired to fight with the “mujahideen.” The source testified at trial, explaining that each time he told Bujol he would be joining AQAP, Bujol replied by saying, “God willing” in Arabic.
To prove his worth to the source and AQAP, Bujol performed numerous purported “training exercises,” often involving surveillance detection and covert means of communication. Moreover, Bujol repeatedly told the source that AQAP should attack the human beings essential to operate military unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) instead of attacking the UAVs themselves. Bujol suggested multiple targets, including one in the Southern District of Texas.
Bujol was arrested on May 30, 2010 after boarding a ship docked at the Port of Houston. He believed the ship was bound for Algeria, where he would stay at an al Qaeda safe house before continuing on to Yemen. Bujol intended to stow away to join AQAP and to deliver items to AQAP that a confidential source had given him. The items included two public access restricted military manuals, global position system receivers, pre-paid international calling cards, SIM cards, and approximately 2,000 in Euros, among other items. Bujol secured these items in his baggage and quickly boarded the ship. Minutes after stowing away in a room on board the ship, agents took him into custody without incident.
Simultaneously, agents executed a search warrant on his apartment and his laptop computer. On the computer, agents found a home-made video montage of still photographs, including images of Osama bin Laden, Najibullah Zazi, and multiple armed “mujahideen” fighters, which Bujol narrated. On the video, which was offered into evidence at trial, he addressed his words to his wife, explaining that he had left her suddenly and without forewarning to pursue “jihad.” Bujol told her he would likely not see her until the afterlife.
The aggravated identity theft charge, of which he was also convicted, stemmed from a false transportation worker identity card (purporting to be a card issued by the Transportation Security Administration) that Bujol possessed to access the Port of Houston. Bujol supplied the confidential source with a passport photo and a false name and the source used these materials to acquire the false card for use in the sting operation. On the night of the operation, Bujol used the false card to gain access to the port.
Bujol has been in federal custody since his May 30, 2010, where he will remain pending transfer to a U.S. Bureau of Prisons facility to be determined in the near future.
This multi-agency investigation was conducted by the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of Texas, the Department of Justice’s Counterterrorism Section, the FBI’s Joint Terrorism Task Force in Bryan, Texas—comprised of the Brazos County, Texas Sheriff’s Office; the Texas A&M University Police Department; the Bryan Police Department; the U.S. Secret Service;, the Waller County, Texas Sheriff’s Office; and the College, Texas Station Police Department. Other investigating agencies were the Houston FBI Joint Terrorism Task Force, the Prairie View A&M University Department of Public Safety, the New Jersey State Police, the Coast Guard Investigative Service, Homeland Security Investigations, Houston Police Department, and the Canada Border Services Agency.
The case was prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorneys Mark McIntyre and Craig Feazel, as well as Garrett Heenan, Trial Attorney from the Counterterrorism Section of the Justice Department’s National Security Division, and former Assistant U.S. Attorney Mark W. White, III.
Al Capone: The Untouchable Legend is a new one-hour biography of the most notorious gangster in history. On January 17th, 1999, Al Capone would have celebrated his 100th birthday. His exploits in the early part of the century have inspired authors, journalists and filmmakers. Myths have always been woven around the figure of Al Capone. Born in Brooklyn, he began his career in crime as protege to New York underworld boss Frankie Yale in the early 1920’s, and then moved to Chicago where he made himself a multi-millionaire from the protection business, gambling, brothels, and speakeasies. He is most infamous for planning the massacre of seven members of a rival gang on Valentine’s Day in 1929. This was also the year the Justice Department named Eliot Ness to form a special crime-busting squad which came to be known as “The Untouchables.” In 1931 Alphonse Capone was convicted on income tax evasion and began an eleven year sentence in the Federal Prison on Alcatraz Island. Capone died in 1947 and is buried in Chicago’s Mount Carmel Cemetery.
But who really was this man? How did this child of Neapolitan immigrants become the most legendary gangster of the “Roaring Twenties.” Using historical film footage, movie scenes, and dramatic recreations filmed on location in Chicago, Brooklyn, Ellis Island, Florida’s Palm Island, and Alcatraz, Al Capone: The Untouchable Legend not only depicts the rise and fall of “Scarface,” but also looks behind the myths at the private family man. Interviews with Capone’s nephew Harry Hart, and with Capone experts John Binder, Dennis Hoffman and William Balsamo all help to illuminate the social and economic milieu of the ’20s and ’30s that led to the rise of the “Mafia.”
DOWNLOAD THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT
DOWNLOAD THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT HERE
The following “media guidance” paper from the Chicago Police Department was obtained and published by the Illinois News Broadcasters Association. The paper states that a number of routine activities for credentialed journalists, such as passing behind police lines, will not be allowed. The paper also includes a number of ominous warnings about not getting arrested and how no special rights will be afforded journalists if they are arrested.
NOT INTENDED FOR GENERAL DISTRIBUTION.
FOR MEDIA GUIDANCE ONLY.
Debra Kirby, chief of the Chicago Police Department Office of International Relations, said it is not the intent of Chicago Police to limit or otherwise interfere with coverage of protests and other events related to the NATO summit. The department anticipates that members of the media will be accompanying protesters.
Kirby said the department is not endorsing a formal embedding policy (reporters/crews will not be assigned to tag along with specific police units).
The department is cognizant that not everyone covering the protests has a NATO or Chicago Police credential. Kirby said credentials from other jurisdictions will be honored, and she recommends that they be worn on a lanyard. At the same time, she is also aware that those who did so in New York encountered problems from protesters; doing so in such circumstances is a judgment call. If there is any question, reporters will be allowed to pull credentials from their pockets to show to police on the street. Information will be released through two joint incident command centers, effective Friday.
– U.S. Secret Service (Security-related information and arrest tallies): (312) 469-1440
– City/OEMC: (312) 746-9454
– Chicago Police News Affairs (generally for non-NATO-related information): (312) 745-6110
In addition, she said that Chicago Police lieutenants and captains “on the ground” will have access to most information. At minimum, OEMC will host one briefing a day on activities relating to the summit at OEMC headquarters, 1411 W. Madison St., probably in the evening. She said information will be relayed to news desks with sufficient time to set up. More will be scheduled if events warrant, but Kirby does not know that it would be the wisest use of a news organization’s staff to place someone at OEMC full-time. News Affairs Director Melissa Stratton is checking to see if the briefings can be webcast. She said that media access generally will be the same as public access. Credentials will, however, allow media personnel access to media-only areas. No “cutting” in and out of police lines will be permitted, or “going up against their backs.” Those who follow protesters onto private property to document their actions are also will be subject to arrest if laws are broken.
Any member of the media who is arrested will have to go through the same booking process as anyone else. Release of equipment depends on what part the equipment played in the events that led to the arrest.
There will not be any quick personal recognizance bond just for media members. Kirby said that the Chicago Police Department does not intend to “break ground” in terms of enforcing the Illinois eavesdropping law. In short, police will not interfere if we videotape or record audio of police activities, including arrests. Likewise, she says the department has no intention of “kettling” protesters as they did on Chicago Avenue during antiwar protests in 2003; there will be plenty of warning by loudspeaker to clear or avoid specific areas before arrests are undertaken; however, those reporters who choose to disregard such warnings are subject to arrest. To date, the department has seen no evidence that protesters are turning on media representatives as happened in New York. She urges media to keep safety in mind and to “not become the story.”
If there is a problem, Office of News Affairs Director Melissa Stratton can be reached through Chicago Police News Affairs.
Chicago Police command will be broken down by sector, and the department has made efforts to provide media parking for large planned events. These parking zones are effective from 8 p.m. Friday until 6 p.m. Monday. They include:
Petrillo/Grant Park/Art Institute events:
– Columbus Drive: Both curbs from Jackson to Monroe, but not blocking the entrance to the Art Institute.
South of Loop/River
– 9th Street: both curbs, Wabash to Michigan
– Upper Randolph: south curb, Columbus to Field Drive
Nurses Rally (only on Friday)
– Randolph, south curb, Clark to LaSalle
– Clark, east curb, Randolph to Lake
North of River
– East Lake Shore Dr.: north curb, mid-block to inner LSD
– Mies Van Der Rohe Ct.: west curb, Chicago to Pearson
– Upper Cityfront Plaza Dr.: west curb, North Water to Illinois (no satellite trucks)
McCormick Place/end of protest
– Cermak Road: south curb, State to Clark
– 24th Street, both curbs, State to Federal
The National Nurses’ Union has control of the parking area for the Friday rally and concert. On Sunday, the CANG8 protest group will set up the media bullpen. In addition, police say they will attempt to set up media parking and bullpen locations along march routes as they determine what is happening.
WHILE PARKING AREAS WILL HAVE POLICE AT THE PERMIETER, POLICE WILL NOT BE CHECKING TO ASSURE THAT CONTENTS ARE SECURE. MEDIA ORGANIZATIONS ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR MAKING CERTAIN THAT VEHICLES AND THEIR CONTENTS ARE SECURE.
The Sunday march steps off at 2 p.m. and is anticipated to take two hours and 15 minutes to cover the 2.64 miles. On Sunday, no risers will be provided at Cermak/Michigan in the bullpen area for the concluding ceremonies of the big march. Cameras will have to shoot over one another. Space is constrained at the end of the march for the general public. Parking Sunday will be at Cermak/State and dispersal of the crowd will be to the west. Kirby does NOT recommend that reporters who march along the parade route try to get into the media bullpen at the end of the march; she said it will be possible, but it will not be easy to do so.
If a suspicious package is found or an area is cordoned off because of a potential bomb, the area cleared will depend on the threat that is posed. Media will be allowed as close as possible, but that is an event-by-event call.
Reporters who carry backpacks should be prepared to show their content to police. You may be asked to fire up and demonstrate any equipment that does not look familiar to officers.
Those who have negotiated parking on private property should inform CPD News Affairs if they have not already done so. Police may check to make certain that vehicles are parked on private property with consent of the owner. Unmarked vehicles should have Chicago Police news media vehicle identification cards displayed at all times. It is the intent of Chicago Police to provide close access, with direct vision and contact with those entering and leaving events/marches/rallies. But police emphasized that those who choose to walk amid the protesters are “on your own.” The department cannot guarantee the safety of those who do so and cannot guaranteed that they can extract any reporter who ends up the target of protesters.
Repeatedly, the speakers stressed that the rights of the media are the same as those of the general public.
Police say if a street is “stripped” of parking, and no parking is allowed for the general public, outside of the aforementioned locations, it is done for a reason. KIRBY STRONGLY SUGGESTS THAT VANS AND CARS BE SENT WITH DRIVERS SO THAT IF WORKING PRESS MEMBERS MUST LEAVE THE VEHICLE, IT REMAINS ATTENDED. She said Chicago Police will not hesitate to tow city-owned vehicles if they are in “stripped” areas, so media representatives should expect to be cut no slack with live trucks or other vehicles that are parked where prohibited.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QAJwINlqvyI
Complete media coverage and updates. Visit our daily weblog.http://mmibooks.wordpress.com
see more at http://www.victims-opfer.com
Die Liste wurde bereits früher hier publiziert:
Vom “Stasiopfer”-Angebot führt ein Link zu einer Website in den USA (www.jya.com), die sich auch mit den Praktiken von Geheimdiensten beschäftigt. Dort findet sich die “Fipro-Liste”, das detaillierte “Finanzprojekt” der Stasi, angefertigt in den letzten Tagen der DDR, um die Rentenansprüche der rund 100 000 hauptamtlichen Mitarbeiter des MfS auch nach dem Zusammenbruch des Systems belegen zu können. Die “Fipro-Liste” ist seit langem bekannt und diente Anfang der neunziger Jahre etwa zur Identifizierung der so genannten OibE – Offiziere im besonderen Einsatz. Diese Liste „Offiziere im besonderen Einsatz“im Jahre 1991 erschien in der “taz. Die Echtheit kann beim BStU überprüft werden.
Siehe u.a. http://www.spiegel.de/spiegel/print/d-22539439.html
Auf Druck ehemaliger STASI-Leute und Ihrer Genossen wurde die Liste aus dem Verkehr gezogen.
Hier ist sie wieder:
090471423014;18;35;00;;BRA(E)CKLEIN, JO(E)RG:;;;2795,00
190435415322;13;00;41;K, 4232/86:;BRA(E)NDEL, LOTHAR;4090;GARTENSTADTSTR. 4;
190435415322;13;00;41;K, 4232/86:;BRA(E)NDEL, LOTHAR;4090;GARTENSTADTSTR. 4;
150359412122;07;00;59;;BRA(E)SE, UDO:;;;22080,00
060769426819;18;31;00;;BRA(E)UER, HOLM:;;;9510,00
031170413111;18;35;00;;BRA(E)UER, OLAF:;;;2795,00
060269415021;18;34;00;;BRA(E)UNER, JO(E)RG:;;;9675,00
160170408225;18;33;00;;BRA(E)UNIG, JO(E)RG:;;;9510,00
150569419728;18;31;00;;BRA(E)UNLICH, HEIKO:;;;9600,00
180470414836;18;33;00;;BRA(E)UNLICH, TOBIAS:;;;6958,87
060468418313;18;33;00;;BRA(E)UTIGAM, JENS:;;;9825,00
190768428922;18;31;00;;BRA(E)UTIGAM, MICHAEL:;;;9648,38
220269425027;18;33;00;;BRA(E)UTIGAM, SVEN:;;;9675,00
181270424938;18;32;00;;BRA(E)UTIGAM, UWE:;;;2795,00
130965400916;01;69;00;;BRAASCH, KARSTEN:;;;15898,50
091165402711;97;08;00;;BRAATZ, ANDREAS:;;;18179,00
260940403112;03;00;42;;BRAATZ, ECKHARD:;;;28080,00
261052505721;04;09;00;;BRAATZ, ELKE:;;;20160,00
151038402729;30;44;00;;BRAATZ, GUENTER:;;;15570,00
300333422120;12;40;00;;BRAATZ, RUDOLF:;;;38250,00
120270411521;07;06;00;;BRAATZ, THOMAS:;;;12460,00
150271422211;18;28;00;;BRAATZ, THOMAS:;;;2720,00
070365403716;97;08;00;;BRAATZ, UWE:;;;17682,50
100557430174;15;18;00;;BRABAND, CARSTEN:;;;22990,00
250255429737;15;02;00;;BRABAND, HENRY:;;;25080,00
111153529817;15;77;00;;BRABAND, ILONA:;;;0,00
241053428221;18;35;00;;BRABANDT, BERTHOLD:;;;25200,00
181252415376;13;80;00;;BRABANT, BERND:;;;20405,00
201239529710;97;01;00;;BRABANT, CHRISTA:;;;19575,00
080139416411;09;06;00;;BRABANT, HEINRICH:;;;19620,00
291037429764;98;20;00;;BRABANT, HEINZ:;;;30937,50
300449426334;99;99;99;::;BRABANT, JOACHIM;1140;MARCHWITZASTR. 3;
300449426334;99;99;99;::;BRABANT, JOACHIM;1140;MARCHWITZASTR. 3;
210357415401;99;02;00;;BRABANT, PETER:;;;23345,00
311261430095;94;65;00;;BRABANT, PETER:;;;18150,00
030162530049;30;84;00;;BRABANT, SIMONE:;;;12321,24
150363430112;15;02;00;;BRABETZ, HEIKO:;;;14850,00
140371403457;03;69;00;;BRACH, ANDREAS:;;;2870,00
051159406154;05;06;00;;BRACH, HARTMUT:;;;17710,00
110637528226;98;27;00;;BRACHAUS, GISELA:;;;23760,00
310540429711;97;06;00;;BRACHAUS, KLAUS:;;;27375,00
290531429730;15;40;00;;BRACHLOW, HERBERT:;;;28500,00
110652529817;30;74;00;;BRACHMANN, DORIS:;;;23262,86
230652413423;04;11;00;;BRACHMANN, HANS-DIETER:;;;26520,00
021165426226;14;40;00;;BRACHMANN, TILO:;;;5263,20
180764401811;02;80;00;;BRACHMANN, WILFRIED:;;;14148,00
210947404438;04;18;00;;BRACHOLD, HERBERT:;;;20872,50
310547412234;07;00;40;;BRACHWITZ, DETLEV:;;;19320,00
200269412287;99;02;00;;BRACHWITZ, GERO:;;;9600,00
300457504515;04;00;41;;BRACHWITZ, ILONA:;;;17595,00
051269413128;18;32;00;;BRACHWITZ, JO(E)RG:;;;9510,00
261042512215;96;15;05;;BRACHWITZ, KRISTINA:;;;26104,16
280752402110;99;43;00;;BRACK, HANS-JUERGEN:;;;19440,00
260639419318;10;00;43;;BRACK, HELMUT:;;;22250,00
220758416412;09;08;00;;BRACK, LUTZ:;;;17595,00
080342429728;94;65;00;;BRACK, MANFRED:;;;23250,00
120760411524;07;00;48;;BRACK, UWE:;;;18013,53
010152404614;04;00;43;;BRACKLOW, EBERHARD:;;;27300,00
210533430054;18;28;00;;BRACKLOW, SIEGFRIED:;;;28500,00
120251404713;17;00;00;;BRACKMANN, GUENTER:;;;25920,00
270162509541;97;06;00;;BRACKROCK, ANDREA:;;;14997,25
151150430068;96;15;00;650/75/11, :;BRADA, WOLFGANG;1130;FRANKFURTER ALLEE 128;
151150430068;96;15;00;650/75/11, :;BRADA, WOLFGANG;1130;FRANKFURTER ALLEE 128;
040469422025;18;32;00;;BRADATSCH, TIMO:;;;9675,00
210655426918;18;35;00;;BRADE, ANDREAS:;;;22350,00
240960530081;99;77;00;;BRADE, ANGELA:;;;19636,77
291157404318;04;51;00;;BRADE, DIRK:;;;20700,00
050535429727;15;53;00;;BRADE, FRED:;;;35250,00
180434430097;18;28;00;;BRADE, GERHARD:;;;27375,00
280665430252;97;08;00;;BRADE, HEIKO:;;;17384,00
061059430025;97;22;00;;BRADE, INGO:;;;18630,00
110768425067;18;32;00;;BRADE, JO(E)RG:;;;9675,00
300170428922;99;43;00;;BRADE, MARIO:;;;9600,00
111268407238;18;35;00;;BRADE, OLIVER:;;;9600,00
230851400211;96;15;21;;BRADE, PETER:;;;25761,38
210742424929;94;11;00;271/68, :;BRADE, ROLF;1600;HERDERSTR. 6;
210742424929;94;11;00;271/68, :;BRADE, ROLF;1600;HERDERSTR. 6;
070336524914;13;26;00;;BRADE, ROSWITHA:;;;25375,00
250748417734;09;08;00;;BRADEL, WOLFGANG:;;;24480,00
100662414811;30;47;00;;BRADEMANN, FRANK:;;;16830,00
060669400830;01;02;00;;BRADEMANN, JENS:;;;8550,00
300344400824;17;00;00;;BRADEMANN, JUERGEN:;;;31680,00
280758415318;08;00;50;;BRADL, ACHIM:;;;16912,50
030562430194;96;15;10;;BRADLER, THORSTEN:;;;18090,00
040669407321;05;69;00;;BRADTKE, MICHAEL:;;;9510,00
240769407421;99;40;00;;BRADTKE, UDO:;;;8300,00
180656529738;94;65;00;;BRAEHMER, IRIS:;;;18529,85
261049404516;18;25;00;;BRAEKOW, ERHARD:;;;27750,00
131256516224;97;07;00;;BRAEKOW, UTE:;;;19046,74
060458404129;97;08;00;;BRAEMER, JOERG:;;;20412,50
270953404113;18;29;00;;BRAEMER, KLAUS-DIETER:;;;23280,00
160254411915;07;00;54;;BRAEMER, LOTHAR:;;;26640,00
260953407411;05;00;40;;BRAEMER, UWE:;;;26640,00
311049516211;99;41;00;;BRAEMING, ILONA:;;;27000,00
280648429751;98;84;00;;BRAEMING, RAINER:;;;22687,50
060238427417;14;06;00;;BRAENDEL, ARMIN:;;;22437,50
260141529712;99;49;00;;BRAENLICH, DORIS:;;;27250,00
191069409129;06;69;00;;BRAENZEL, THOMAS:;;;9510,00
191169500712;01;96;31;;BRAESEL, ANKA:;;;2297,58
071169430025;15;69;00;;BRAESEL, MATHIAS:;;;9510,00
250943407611;05;00;40;;BRAETSCH, UWE:;;;25562,50
090552506444;98;82;00;;BRAETZ, MONIKA:;;;22916,37
120248409214;04;12;00;;BRAEUER, DIETER:;;;21000,00
201065429217;18;33;00;;BRAEUER, DIRK:;;;14110,04
131128430012;99;02;00;;BRAEUER, GERD:;;;37500,00
270437430059;30;47;00;;BRAEUER, GUENTER:;;;20880,00
310843429751;97;06;00;;BRAEUER, HERBERT:;;;24000,00
220263426213;02;00;44;;BRAEUER, INGOLF:;;;19140,00
151256424985;97;17;00;;BRAEUER, JUERGEN:;;;21332,50
171163430057;15;00;49;;BRAEUER, KARSTEN:;;;17572,50
280464426716;14;80;00;;BRAEUER, MATHIAS:;;;15482,50
310557415121;96;15;25;;BRAEUER, MICHAEL:;;;25884,00
180661423823;13;00;43;;BRAEUER, PETER:;;;16142,50
170955513024;99;77;00;;BRAEUER, SABINE:;;;10394,09
270853426219;97;29;00;;BRAEUER, STEFFEN:;;;26640,00
191155527711;30;49;00;;BRAEUER, STEFFI:;;;11382,21
241065426346;94;03;00;;BRAEUER, SVEN:;;;11016,00
270546407210;30;42;00;;BRAEUER, UDO:;;;19440,00
140160425074;13;08;00;;BRAEUER, VOLKER:;;;15592,50
041244428260;99;78;00;;BRAEUER, WILFRIED:;;;25975,00
150469528230;14;53;00;;BRAEUNIG, ANNETT:;;;12205,00
071252429754;30;47;00;;BRAEUNIG, BERND:;;;24120,00
190532429718;99;40;00;;BRAEUNIG, GERHARD:;;;28500,00
270153429718;96;15;13;;BRAEUNIG, HANS-JUERGEN:;;;25530,00
040940530061;98;83;00;;BRAEUNIG, HELGA:;;;23040,00
040851503344;30;84;00;;BRAEUNIG, ILONA:;;;21390,00
200551529753;96;15;31;;BRAEUNIG, INGRID:;;;25920,00
010242424512;13;00;49;;BRAEUNIG, JUERGEN:;;;27000,00
081144422714;04;26;00;;BRAEUNIG, KLAUS-JUERGEN:;;;23187,50
250249428228;30;80;00;;BRAEUNIG, REINER:;;;22590,00
200149528226;14;30;00;;BRAEUNIG, SONJA:;;;16610,00
231249524937;30;80;00;;BRAEUNIG, SONJA:;;;21045,00
310371417444;09;69;00;;BRAEUNIG, SWEN:;;;3928,06
110461422013;98;84;00;;BRAEUNIG, ULF:;;;18610,96
150667430189;15;18;00;;BRAEUNIGER, OLAF:;;;14819,00
190750420017;11;00;43;;BRAEUNING, HUBERTUS:;;;29160,00
030851528315;30;84;00;;BRAEUNING, MARGIT:;;;15101,16
051155414210;07;08;00;;BRAEUNING, ROLF:;;;17077,50
160163430109;98;81;00;;BRAEUNLICH, FRANK:;;;16830,00
100568413716;97;22;00;;BRAEUNLICH, FRANK:;;;14994,00
130652424976;60;90;00;;BRAEUNLICH, GERD:;;;
130652424976;60;90;00;;BRAEUNLICH, GERD:;;;18917,01
140440429731;98;84;00;;BRAEUNLICH, JUERGEN:;;;30187,50
190639418218;10;00;40;;BRAEUNLICH, KLAUS:;;;25500,00
270261430126;97;06;00;;BRAEUNLICH, WOLFRAM:;;;18232,50
141039506926;99;43;00;;BRAEUNLING, ANNEMARIE:;;;20625,00
231047413411;97;01;00;;BRAEUNLING, EBERHARD:;;;27750,00
120451421817;99;02;00;;BRAEUNLING, GUENTER:;;;28980,00
080342406913;99;43;00;;BRAEUNLING, WILFRIED:;;;21750,00
041070417739;97;01;00;;BRAEUTIGAM, ANDRE:;;;3070,16
180457423623;17;00;00;;BRAEUTIGAM, ANDREAS:;;;18285,00
200950517717;09;40;00;;BRAEUTIGAM, BRIGITTE:;;;19050,20
041244417748;09;51;00;;BRAEUTIGAM, ERNST:;;;27000,00
191043406114;04;06;00;;BRAEUTIGAM, GOETZ:;;;22437,50
251029420210;11;00;47;;BRAEUTIGAM, GUENTER:;;;27000,00
290753408310;06;14;00;;BRAEUTIGAM, HANS-HENNING:;;;18457,50
061150409315;10;06;00;;BRAEUTIGAM, HELMUT:;;;22475,00
111046430053;18;27;00;;BRAEUTIGAM, HOLGER:;;;27750,00
300347429729;97;06;00;;BRAEUTIGAM, JOERGEN:;;;26250,00
191169430048;99;02;00;;BRAEUTIGAM, MARCO:;;;13880,00
160748429779;15;00;41;;BRAEUTIGAM, PETER:;;;33120,00
010369408544;12;69;00;;BRAEUTIGAM, RONALD:;;;12412,26
301269428230;14;69;00;;BRAEUTIGAM, STEFFEN:;;;12085,00
270749423931;99;13;00;;BRAEUTIGAM, WOLFRAM:;;;27060,00
280868430041;18;35;00;;BRAEUTIGAMM, HENRY:;;;10600,00
210963402619;02;00;49;;BRAHM, FRANK:;;;19965,00
130647402510;02;53;00;;BRAHM, GERHARD:;;;27000,00
090866402648;01;00;48;;BRAHM, RENE:;;;12035,00
031170401516;02;06;00;;BRAHM, THOMAS:;;;3510,00
190469402511;02;06;00;;BRAHM, THORSTEN:;;;13175,00
130171524626;13;07;00;;BRAJER, KATHRIN:;;;3220,00
271256409546;06;03;00;;BRAMER, SIEGFRIED:;;;17490,00
280170415114;98;82;00;;BRAMIG, RENE:;;;10376,13
120769403918;18;35;00;;BRAMMER, ANDREAS:;;;10035,00
140271416453;18;80;00;;BRAND, AXEL:;;;2945,00
130635429716;97;06;00;;BRAND, EBERHARD:;;;37500,00
020134529711;97;06;00;;BRAND, EDITH:;;;25375,00
180764421812;12;55;00;;BRAND, EGBERT:;;;16170,00
010359417789;09;15;00;;BRAND, FRANK:;;;17974,00
050152421816;12;00;52;;BRAND, GUNTER:;;;25200,00
070558508936;04;55;00;;BRAND, HEIKE:;;;18669,32
200170413749;99;43;00;;BRAND, JAN:;;;9510,00
281069408512;98;82;00;;BRAND, JOERG:;;;10376,13
280970409927;18;35;00;;BRAND, MARIO:;;;2795,00
160241428224;14;00;40;;BRAND, ROLAND:;;;26820,00
290370413016;05;69;00;;BRAND, STEFAN:;;;9910,00
300870421828;18;34;00;;BRAND, STEFFEN:;;;6736,77
190569417534;18;33;00;;BRAND, THOMAS:;;;9600,00
130755423626;04;53;00;;BRAND, WOLFRAM:;;;24150,00
100857516025;11;77;00;;BRANDAU, MARITTA:;;;16708,73
271169413248;08;00;44;;BRANDAU, SVEN:;;;8300,00
170153416011;11;06;00;;BRANDAU, WOLFGANG:;;;24782,50
281052402720;02;55;00;;BRANDECKER, DIETER:;;;20160,00
220969402715;17;00;00;;BRANDENBURG, AXEL:;;;8300,00
241169427036;94;03;00;;BRANDENBURG, BERND:;;;9630,00
281252405213;30;63;00;;BRANDENBURG, BERND:;;;14100,00
010359400514;01;06;27;;BRANDENBURG, DIETMAR:;;;18457,50
061152424914;13;15;00;;BRANDENBURG, HANS:;;;10002,57
230940522819;96;15;22;;BRANDENBURG, HILDEGARD:;;;24480,00
090267409928;07;06;00;;BRANDENBURG, INGO:;;;16832,32
110171431114;15;69;00;;BRANDENBURG, INGO:;;;2925,64
090663506922;30;72;00;;BRANDENBURG, JANA:;;;13860,00
110139402110;02;19;00;;BRANDENBURG, KLAUS:;;;29250,00
080965403428;97;08;00;;BRANDENBURG, LUTZ:;;;16470,00
031164422775;94;65;00;;BRANDENBURG, LUTZ:;;;17985,00
301035422725;97;22;00;;BRANDENBURG, MANFRED:;;;27937,50
020966404356;18;28;00;;BRANDENBURG, RENE:;;;16686,00
100244429746;99;43;00;;BRANDENBURG, ROLF:;;;27000,00
240164430063;94;03;00;;BRANDENBURG, THOMAS:;;;19800,00
300669430036;18;33;00;;BRANDENBURG, TINO:;;;6816,29
260942425008;13;07;00;;BRANDENBURGER, KLAUS:;;;25216,68
030565405912;04;00;40;;BRANDENBURGER, OLAF:;;;16665,00
141058523924;13;55;00;;BRANDENBURGER, PETRA:;;;16088,13
180656411545;07;51;00;;BRANDES, GERALD:;;;17710,00
230251428915;14;18;00;;BRANDHOFF, MANFRED:;;;25200,00
140855420018;96;15;26;;BRANDIES, JUERGEN:;;;21780,00
020855519724;96;15;26;;BRANDIES, SABINE:;;;17940,00
231268407410;18;35;00;;BRANDIS, ANDRE:;;;10900,00
140465402615;02;06;00;;BRANDIS, DIRK:;;;16500,00
130364407426;97;22;00;;BRANDIS, GERD:;;;17423,09
290565411846;07;00;53;;BRANDL, RALF:;;;14355,00
150168408411;18;35;00;;BRANDL, TONI:;;;9675,00
200458428288;14;00;57;;BRANDL, UWE:;;;20355,00
260753409113;06;65;00;;BRANDL, WERNER:;;;20040,00
210360413415;08;00;46;;BRANDL, WILFRIED:;;;22110,00
111266421511;12;09;00;;BRANDNER, ANDREAS:;;;11016,00
260443429717;97;06;00;;BRANDNER, GERD:;;;26250,00
011149422779;12;00;40;;BRANDNER, HARALD:;;;23200,00
080562425112;99;09;00;;BRANDNER, HENNING:;;;18425,00
080468430310;99;77;00;;BRANDNER, JENS:;;;14319,00
080468430302;97;06;00;;BRANDNER, MARKO:;;;15021,00
180669402138;99;43;00;;BRANDSTAEDTER, DIRK:;;;13575,00
020446402111;02;06;00;;BRANDSTAEDTER, SIEGMAR:;;;23250,00
080329406118;17;00;00;;BRANDSTAETER, SIEGFRIED:;;;33000,00
021240408918;06;60;00;;BRANDT, ALBRECHT:;;;23250,00
290828430011;97;06;00;;BRANDT, ALWIN:;;;39750,00
010162400617;04;06;00;;BRANDT, ANDREAS:;;;18260,00
050558402121;02;51;00;;BRANDT, ARNOLD:;;;16560,00
151246503719;17;00;00;;BRANDT, BAERBEL:;;;20625,00
080471526145;97;06;00;;BRANDT, BEATRICE:;;;4900,00
031052424936;94;03;00;;BRANDT, BERND:;;;25200,00
140157502737;30;47;00;;BRANDT, BIRKA:;;;17693,00
060739530076;97;17;00;;BRANDT, BRIGITTE:;;;21750,00
031243406415;04;80;00;;BRANDT, BURCKHARD:;;;26625,00
200856505015;18;77;00;;BRANDT, CHRISTIANE:;;;18975,00
270257409914;15;03;00;;BRANDT, CLAUS-DIETER:;;;20010,00
290453527641;94;30;00;;BRANDT, DAGMAR:;;;19664,33
281266406727;99;14;00;;BRANDT, DIEGO:;;;14375,00
090647413910;08;08;00;;BRANDT, DIETER:;;;17687,50
040552402711;99;40;00;;BRANDT, DIETER:;;;21375,00
010962430136;18;71;20;;BRANDT, DIETMAR:;;;14685,00
110355407119;18;78;00;;BRANDT, DIETRICH:;;;20280,00
151168412255;18;35;00;;BRANDT, DIRK:;;;9825,00
251045500827;01;80;00;;BRANDT, DORIT:;;;15660,57
101251416411;09;00;44;;BRANDT, EBERHARD:;;;23760,00
091058410628;07;03;00;;BRANDT, FRANK:;;;19200,66
240852404029;03;00;49;;BRANDT, GERT:;;;22320,00
190937429724;99;26;00;;BRANDT, GUENTER:;;;28500,00
291051426316;99;55;00;;BRANDT, GUNTER:;;;24960,00
070535403912;03;00;48;;BRANDT, HANS-DIETER:;;;18375,00
150653410718;07;43;00;;BRANDT, HANS-HELMUT:;;;23040,00
130848414411;08;00;56;;BRANDT, HANS-JUERGEN:;;;17192,50
061152411419;17;00;00;;BRANDT, HANS-PETER:;;;19440,00
040749409116;99;40;00;;BRANDT, HANS-ULRICH:;;;27360,00
240843403710;17;00;00;;BRANDT, HARTMUT:;;;18285,00
051259406119;94;03;00;;BRANDT, HEIKO:;;;18345,00
241166403119;03;00;42;;BRANDT, HEINO:;;;2236,00
230236429717;98;18;00;;BRANDT, HELMUT:;;;35250,00
280369407525;97;01;00;;BRANDT, HENRY:;;;3674,19
031256430246;15;00;41;;BRANDT, HOLGER:;;;26162,50
220539429731;96;15;22;;BRANDT, HORST:;;;27187,50
281147403216;03;06;00;;BRANDT, JOACHIM:;;;21750,00
291062413027;08;80;00;;BRANDT, JOCHEN:;;;16170,00
120364430109;96;15;22;;BRANDT, JUERGEN:;;;15510,00
060552400618;01;06;27;;BRANDT, KARL:;;;18227,50
290961400719;18;32;00;;BRANDT, KARSTEN:;;;23100,00
140958411915;30;48;00;;BRANDT, KARSTEN:;;;18240,00
290556509518;99;10;00;;BRANDT, KERSTIN:;;;21900,00
110344413011;07;55;00;;BRANDT, KLAUS:;;;20125,00
070870430619;15;69;00;;BRANDT, MAREK:;;;2925,64
020239529718;99;02;00;;BRANDT, MARIA:;;;24000,00
050155529734;98;83;00;;BRANDT, MARION:;;;15720,26
040869412272;07;06;00;;BRANDT, MATTHIAS:;;;8592,10
091260401514;99;43;00;;BRANDT, MICHAEL:;;;17647,02
200558414529;08;51;00;;BRANDT, PETER:;;;19492,50
011149420319;11;14;00;;BRANDT, PETER:;;;24462,50
250466422017;97;22;00;;BRANDT, PETER:;;;17251,50
010252526328;98;83;00;;BRANDT, PETRA:;;;21600,00
290449415321;08;08;00;;BRANDT, RAINER:;;;23875,00
200945430051;15;08;00;;BRANDT, RAINER:;;;24000,00
041068428332;97;22;00;;BRANDT, RICO:;;;9875,00
030847416417;09;00;44;;BRANDT, ROBERT:;;;21562,50
301068424436;18;31;00;;BRANDT, RONNY:;;;9675,00
270869419822;07;69;00;;BRANDT, SILVIO:;;;8302,58
100271426858;18;32;00;;BRANDT, STEFFEN:;;;6958,87
270169430035;96;15;22;;BRANDT, STEPHAN:;;;9555,00
290170411227;18;34;00;;BRANDT, SVEN:;;;9510,00
050970428251;18;31;00;;BRANDT, SYLVIO:;;;6705,00
240463402134;02;08;00;;BRANDT, THILO:;;;16252,50
200969403111;18;38;00;;BRANDT, THOMAS:;;;9510,00
300964402628;02;09;00;;BRANDT, TORSTEN:;;;16720,00
130353429718;99;14;00;;BRANDT, UDO:;;;24300,00
180735402719;02;26;00;;BRANDT, ULRICH:;;;23250,00
260256502739;99;55;00;;BRANDT, UTE:;;;19969,19
200770400730;18;35;00;;BRANDT, VOLKER:;;;3475,00
120933429715;95;45;00;;BRANDT, WALTER:;;;21750,00
191155405917;04;06;00;;BRANDT, WILFRIED:;;;18842,50
250136429718;99;02;00;;BRANDT, WILFRIED:;;;31125,00
190455405631;30;47;00;;BRANDT, WILFRIED:;;;26840,00
270158411410;07;09;00;;BRANDT, WOLFGANG:;;;21102,50
120149402412;12;18;00;;BRANDT, WOLFGANG:;;;23712,50
151051400824;01;14;00;;BRANDT, WOLFGANG:;;;20520,00
270953409117;99;40;00;;BRANDT, WOLFGANG:;;;25530,00
090655419036;99;43;00;;BRANDTNER, MANFRED:;;;25875,00
250660407515;97;01;00;;BRANDTNER, THOMAS:;;;23712,50
151064430280;96;15;13;;BRANDWEIN, MICHAEL:;;;16500,00
251239530127;99;77;00;;BRANKE, HELGA:;;;41040,00
241039430288;94;65;00;;BRANKE, JUERGEN:;;;27750,00
190446409518;06;02;00;;BRANKE, KLAUS:;;;28312,50
070630430011;97;07;00;;BRANKE, KURT:;;;27000,00
140154402714;30;54;00;;BRANNYS, GEORG:;;;24620,00
211166427412;99;43;00;;BRANSTNER, JENS:;;;15714,00
210749420517;12;07;00;;BRANZ, KLAUS:;;;29625,00
190449410813;07;00;49;;BRASA, GUENTER:;;;27360,00
110970412243;07;06;00;;BRASACK, GUNAR:;;;3557,10
290148410615;07;06;00;;BRASCHE, KLAUS-DIETER:;;;21187,50
070350429796;15;08;00;;BRASCHING, DIETER:;;;22413,01
180263530068;15;19;00;;BRASE, SIMONE:;;;14912,98
011069427625;18;34;00;;BRASE, SWEN:;;;6876,77
260371422443;12;09;00;;BRASOW, RAMON:;;;2700,00
010329430018;97;08;00;;BRASSAT, ALFRED:;;;5437,50
070261400852;01;15;00;;BRASSAT, FRANK:;;;18312,00
140569400868;01;69;00;;BRASSAT, RONALD:;;;6671,61
021270400220;01;69;00;;BRASSEN, ANDREAS:;;;2896,61
111254421215;96;15;00;3039/82, M:;BRATE, ANDREAS;1142;MAX-HERRMANN-STR. 4;
111254421215;96;15;00;3039/82, M:;BRATE, ANDREAS;1142;MAX-HERRMANN-STR. 4;
210637413216;08;51;00;;BRATFISCH, FRITZ:;;;24000,00
120964419018;10;65;00;;BRATFISCH, PASQUALE:;;;12925,00
161253419311;97;01;00;;BRATGE, HANS-JUERGEN:;;;27360,00
280536409529;06;08;00;;BRATKE, ALFRED:;;;28250,00
021267422736;10;00;51;;BRATKE, MAIK:;;;13032,00
240366408024;06;51;00;;BRATKE, THOMAS:;;;16645,50
010554426314;13;00;40;;BRATTIG, ANDREAS:;;;18179,59
300959402244;99;43;00;;BRATZ, DETLEF:;;;21332,50
020760502225;98;27;00;;BRATZ, MANUELA:;;;21142,50
130644428010;14;18;00;;BRATZ, ROLAND:;;;26250,00
200952506915;99;49;00;;BRAUCHLER, DORIS:;;;17825,00
210751403732;17;00;00;;BRAUCHMANN, BERND:;;;30960,00
070652503015;17;00;00;;BRAUCHMANN, INGRID:;;;18199,95
111157403728;03;53;00;;BRAUCHMANN, RALF:;;;22440,00
040650524018;99;09;00;;BRAUER, BAERBEL:;;;25920,00
150358422791;12;00;40;;BRAUER, BERND:;;;22080,00
110554420527;12;00;42;;BRAUER, BERND:;;;26640,00
140762430137;98;83;00;;BRAUER, BJOERN:;;;17270,00
011240502518;97;01;00;;BRAUER, BRIGITTE:;;;20250,00
040552505112;18;77;00;;BRAUER, DORIS:;;;21362,21
311041529720;99;43;00;;BRAUER, ERIKA:;;;22125,00
200166412233;60;90;00;;BRAUER, FRANK:;;;
200166412233;60;90;00;;BRAUER, FRANK:;;;13630,00
120250417117;09;06;00;;BRAUER, GOTTFRIED:;;;21000,00
190843400816;94;65;00;;BRAUER, GUENTER:;;;24000,00
080341429734;99;43;00;;BRAUER, GUENTHER:;;;21750,00
090248429747;94;65;00;;BRAUER, HANS-JOACHIM:;;;27750,00
290965509535;06;09;00;;BRAUER, HEIKE:;;;12762,58
170169402714;01;69;00;;BRAUER, HEIKO:;;;13250,00
180266406206;04;06;00;;BRAUER, HOLGER:;;;16281,00
190933406138;97;08;00;;BRAUER, HORST:;;;28500,00
120962407224;97;01;00;;BRAUER, JAN:;;;16335,00
181169409514;97;22;00;;BRAUER, JENS:;;;6757,50
031265413018;17;00;00;;BRAUER, JOERG:;;;13345,50
271254429746;97;08;00;;BRAUER, KLAUS-PETER:;;;21700,00
250158530147;99;09;00;;BRAUER, MARTINA:;;;14916,87
250451419325;99;09;00;;BRAUER, MICHAEL:;;;28320,00
250933430068;60;90;00;;BRAUER, PETER:;;;
250933430068;60;90;00;;BRAUER, PETER:;;;23520,00
300839413045;08;00;42;;BRAUER, RUDOLF:;;;34560,00
180937429717;94;03;00;;BRAUER, SIEGFRIED:;;;21000,00
241260530122;15;80;00;;BRAUER, SILVIA:;;;14171,58
090163402529;94;03;00;;BRAUER, TORSTEN:;;;18810,00
270737402519;02;06;00;;BRAUER, WILLY:;;;21000,00
201161406197;04;08;00;;BRAUER, WOLFGANG:;;;15744,00
010234509225;30;56;00;;BRAUMANN, ILSE:;;;13680,00
220769410710;18;35;00;;BRAUMANN, RALF:;;;6736,77
250248412216;05;06;00;;BRAUMANN, ROLF-DIETER:;;;19500,00
040751410319;07;12;00;;BRAUMANN, ULRICH:;;;21060,00
071268406936;18;31;00;;BRAUN, ANDRE:;;;9825,00
271251426611;94;03;00;;BRAUN, ANDRE:;;;24900,00
310861409578;06;00;40;;BRAUN, ANDREAS:;;;17325,00
280963413119;99;43;00;;BRAUN, ANDREAS:;;;16260,48
100469404611;99;43;00;;BRAUN, ANDREAS:;;;9600,00
170154422720;30;57;00;;BRAUN, ANDREAS:;;;16080,00
240569528923;14;00;54;;BRAUN, ANETT:;;;13275,00
181252527319;94;03;00;;BRAUN, ANNEROSE:;;;20872,50
150641406930;99;43;00;;BRAUN, BERND:;;;21625,00
191061500876;01;51;00;;BRAUN, BIANCA:;;;16716,07
270846528225;14;08;00;;BRAUN, BIRGIT:;;;21387,50
091049504411;03;53;00;;BRAUN, BRIGITTE:;;;23840,00
030743506928;99;43;00;;BRAUN, BRIGITTE:;;;19172,37
071047506917;99;43;00;;BRAUN, BRIGITTE:;;;20182,50
220728404111;99;43;00;;BRAUN, BRUNO:;;;21750,00
070643428228;99;26;00;;BRAUN, CLAUS-DIETER:;;;24125,00
190355421319;98;84;00;;BRAUN, DIETER:;;;22140,00
280758428215;99;43;00;;BRAUN, DIETMAR:;;;18630,00
060130504118;99;43;00;;BRAUN, DORA:;;;17940,00
090639429728;98;19;00;;BRAUN, EDGAR:;;;51750,00
091053404317;97;17;00;;BRAUN, EDWIN:;;;22320,00
070546411416;07;07;00;;BRAUN, ERNST-ERIK:;;;28020,00
280762502510;02;00;44;;BRAUN, EVELYN:;;;13767,07
091148428012;30;51;00;;BRAUN, FRANK:;;;15120,00
281260521839;98;85;00;;BRAUN, GABRIELA:;;;17283,64
281036417754;98;19;00;;BRAUN, GERHARD:;;;25200,00
190756403728;99;43;00;;BRAUN, GERO:;;;21390,00
310844404310;94;30;00;;BRAUN, HANS-JOACHIM:;;;27750,00
151053417160;11;02;00;;BRAUN, HANS-JOERG:;;;25200,00
110149426714;97;06;00;;BRAUN, HARALD:;;;23360,00
120338430068;99;53;00;;BRAUN, HARRI:;;;25920,00
271154417748;09;40;00;;BRAUN, HEINZ:;;;23250,00
080665429239;14;08;00;;BRAUN, HENDRIK:;;;15322,00
100636403713;03;99;00;;BRAUN, HORST:;;;42750,00
100565403723;03;18;00;;BRAUN, INGO:;;;21120,00
190170500424;18;80;00;;BRAUN, JANA:;;;13730,00
151168422744;17;00;00;;BRAUN, JENS:;;;8300,00
020653424719;13;00;51;;BRAUN, JOCHEN:;;;25200,00
240362421010;12;65;00;;BRAUN, JU(E)RGEN:;;;17022,50
200251413943;08;00;61;;BRAUN, JUERGEN:;;;17077,50
140154421317;99;40;00;;BRAUN, JUERGEN:;;;25320,00
260441529714;15;07;00;;BRAUN, KARIN:;;;16838,64
160952411816;07;80;00;;BRAUN, KARL-HEINZ:;;;18000,00
181062430102;99;51;00;;BRAUN, KARSTEN:;;;17820,00
051243429738;97;06;00;;BRAUN, KLAUS:;;;20500,00
121249404313;03;02;00;;BRAUN, MANFRED:;;;29250,00
040637428216;14;11;00;;BRAUN, MANFRED:;;;26312,50
040244406913;99;43;00;;BRAUN, MANFRED:;;;24000,00
071064402714;02;14;00;;BRAUN, MARIO:;;;15840,00
090267403120;98;82;00;;BRAUN, MATHIAS:;;;17490,00
041264430085;99;02;00;;BRAUN, MICHAEL:;;;18205,00
061064406142;04;06;00;;BRAUN, MIKE:;;;15268,00
050670400046;98;19;00;;BRAUN, MIRKO:;;;3620,00
101069429224;18;31;00;;BRAUN, MIRKO:;;;9600,00
080150504623;99;77;00;;BRAUN, MONIKA:;;;21600,00
080854429713;98;83;00;;BRAUN, PETER:;;;19237,50
240166421320;98;19;00;;BRAUN, RAINER:;;;11016,00
241159417715;99;53;00;;BRAUN, RALF:;;;18343,26
271262402535;02;80;00;;BRAUN, RENE:;;;16190,04
090970414411;18;33;00;;BRAUN, ROLAND:;;;2795,00
080237528214;14;51;00;;BRAUN, SIEGLINDE:;;;19965,00
010169500418;18;78;00;;BRAUN, SILKE:;;;14025,00
100269413935;18;34;00;;BRAUN, STEFFEN:;;;9675,00
050271423128;18;38;00;;BRAUN, STEFFEN:;;;2795,00
130770424723;18;35;00;;BRAUN, SVEN:;;;6705,00
210369417738;18;32;00;;BRAUN, THOMAS:;;;10725,00
280569426210;18;33;00;;BRAUN, TINO:;;;6958,87
201058400619;01;69;00;;BRAUN, UWE:;;;21792,50
070238428224;14;02;00;;BRAUN, WALTER:;;;30750,00
310534429723;99;14;00;;BRAUN, WERNER:;;;37500,00
010845422727;12;08;00;;BRAUN, WOLF-DIETER:;;;22125,00
290770409411;18;28;00;;BRAUNE, ANDRE:;;;2720,00
210767410814;07;06;00;;BRAUNE, FRITZ-GUENTER:;;;16175,23
301053414219;06;08;00;;BRAUNE, GUENTER:;;;17422,50
140235429724;97;17;00;;BRAUNE, HEINZ:;;;41250,00
271064428240;14;14;00;;BRAUNE, JENS:;;;16170,00
070271400864;01;69;00;;BRAUNE, JENS:;;;2896,61
280543529713;97;17;00;;BRAUNE, JUTTA:;;;24562,50
191270409817;18;32;00;;BRAUNE, MARCO:;;;2795,00
230264412322;30;62;00;;BRAUNE, MARIO:;;;14685,00
070552424926;94;11;00;;BRAUNE, RALPH:;;;22942,50
210366415315;97;08;00;;BRAUNE, RENE:;;;16960,53
080260412228;99;02;00;;BRAUNE, THOMAS:;;;23045,00
200655414512;11;20;00;;BRAUNE, UWE:;;;23460,00
260869430061;99;43;00;;BRAUNEIS, UWE:;;;9510,00
261161409237;06;69;00;;BRAUNER, DIETMAR:;;;16967,50
181146424519;13;20;00;;BRAUNER, MANFRED:;;;24000,00
310742524514;13;77;00;;BRAUNER, VIKTORIA:;;;14677,42
180751417742;09;01;00;;BRAUNER, WERNER:;;;24480,00
140252429806;96;15;11;;BRAUNERT, HANS-JOACHIM:;;;33120,00
110462430103;96;15;21;;BRAUNERT, MATTHIAS:;;;17490,00
220734530085;15;80;00;;BRAUNGARDT, ELFRIEDE:;;;20375,00
160757430122;94;65;00;;BRAUNGARDT, VOLKER:;;;19008,39
120471415713;08;69;00;;BRAUNGART, STEFFEN:;;;3220,00
080955408532;18;77;00;;BRAUNS, ANDREAS:;;;21409,03
250154413111;97;08;00;;BRAUNS, LOTHAR:;;;22500,00
080757419716;97;08;00;;BRAUNSBERGER, DETLEF:;;;17595,00
020851500719;01;96;31;;BRAUNSCHWEIG, ANGELIKA:;;;17806,45
021049423810;94;03;00;;BRAUNSCHWEIG, ECKHARD:;;;24000,00
300949523835;98;83;00;;BRAUNSCHWEIG, HEIDI:;;;18802,50
150369408928;18;32;00;;BRAUNSCHWEIG, JENS:;;;9675,00
230442429718;99;43;00;;BRAUNSCHWEIG, JUERGEN:;;;22500,00
240549400711;01;96;31;;BRAUNSCHWEIG, SIEGBERT:;;;18000,00
120338415351;08;02;00;;BRAUTZSCH, PETER:;;;25500,00
120571427623;18;32;00;;BRAUTZSCH, STEFFEN:;;;2795,00
231166427613;95;45;00;;BRAUTZSCH, UWE:;;;15714,00
241267415338;99;43;00;;BRAUTZSCH, WOLFGANG:;;;14025,00
090252528318;14;96;00;;BRECHEIS, MONIKA:;;;19440,00
260759406431;04;00;45;;BRECHLIN, FRED:;;;21330,00
070652408915;98;19;00;;BRECHLIN, GERT:;;;25530,00
290649406438;04;55;00;;BRECHLIN, HELMUT:;;;20072,58
070344406168;04;30;00;;BRECHLIN, KLAUS-PETER:;;;24000,00
300744416219;09;77;00;;BRECHLING, BERNHARD:;;;37620,00
110964402778;18;71;20;;BRECHOT, TORSTEN:;;;21010,00
170968401339;01;06;26;;BRECHT, ANDREAS:;;;9510,00
220759410127;99;43;00;;BRECHT, FRANK:;;;22252,50
161257410111;99;43;00;;BRECHT, HOLGER:;;;21390,00
210950412228;07;08;00;;BRECKAU, JUERGEN:;;;20160,00
280848412217;07;06;00;;BRECKAU, WOLFGANG:;;;23812,50
201148422010;96;15;22;;BREDACK, ROLAND:;;;27300,00
200157501517;02;06;00;;BREDDIN, ANNELIE:;;;17834,27
011254402518;02;65;00;;BREDDIN, HERBERT:;;;19440,00
081163402516;07;06;00;;BREDDIN, MATTHIAS:;;;17325,00
061061413216;08;00;44;;BREDDIN, PETER:;;;18590,00
150561402526;97;01;00;;BREDDIN, ROLAND:;;;24210,00
311250407519;05;06;00;;BREDE, ECKHARD:;;;22320,00
171170403815;18;35;00;;BREDENDIEK, TINO:;;;6705,00
080259530016;18;80;00;;BREDERECK, KARIN:;;;16039,44
281257500711;30;83;00;;BREDEREKE, KARIN:;;;14263,44
140741406170;04;11;00;;BREDERLOW, ROLAND:;;;30375,00
240468530063;97;06;00;;BREDIS, CHRISTINE:;;;11420,93
210334402712;02;11;00;;BREDIS, MANFRED:;;;33750,00
280265415328;94;65;00;;BREDIS, TORSTEN:;;;16830,00
120946518514;10;06;00;;BREDOW, CHRISTINE:;;;21756,77
131144418515;10;00;46;;BREDOW, HORST:;;;24312,50
151051401958;03;00;41;;BREDOW, LOTHAR:;;;25200,00
220470404834;18;33;00;;BREDOW, MICHAEL:;;;2720,00
191262430114;15;07;00;;BREEDE, DIETMAR:;;;15675,00
250261401917;02;00;43;;BREESE, HARTMUT:;;;18232,50
230446530039;97;22;00;;BREETZ, BRIGITTE:;;;20625,00
200439430067;97;22;00;;BREETZ, GUENTER:;;;20187,50
040448401313;03;51;00;;BREETZKE, KLAUS:;;;23400,00
131167419713;18;33;00;;BREHM, FRANK:;;;10800,00
140368419829;11;69;00;;BREHM, GERD:;;;9675,00
180366420216;97;06;00;;BREHM, GERHARD:;;;16200,00
230752419013;10;00;40;;BREHM, HARTMUT:;;;24480,00
261048400812;94;11;00;;BREHM, HEINZ:;;;34500,00
140367430129;97;22;00;;BREHM, KARSTEN:;;;15876,00
200470417119;09;69;00;;BREHM, MARCO:;;;9510,00
120571410813;18;34;00;;BREHM, MIKE:;;;2795,00
080669420223;18;28;00;;BREHM, OLAF:;;;6792,09
230744422028;07;06;00;;BREHM, WOLFGANG:;;;26250,00
160753417414;97;06;00;;BREHME, HARALD:;;;25920,00
220256414222;99;51;00;;BREHME, RALF:;;;22400,00
290158407444;97;08;00;;BREHME, RENE:;;;22080,00
110469405218;18;34;00;;BREHMEL, THOMAS:;;;9675,00
181158404128;96;15;05;;BREHMER, FRED:;;;18862,50
210754529912;99;49;00;;BREHMER, GABRIELE:;;;1126,61
200150429890;15;03;00;;BREHMER, GERD:;;;24571,67
270235404119;03;40;00;;BREHMER, GERD:;;;17048,75
070235429715;96;15;15;;BREHMER, HERBERT:;;;33000,00
180942429746;99;40;00;;BREHMER, INGO:;;;26250,00
160942529714;99;43;00;;BREHMER, JUTTA:;;;19843,24
050553410122;04;80;00;;BREHMER, KARL-HEINZ:;;;18720,00
050140429714;15;22;00;;BREHMER, PETER:;;;27000,00
140537504128;03;40;00;;BREHMER, RENATE:;;;14886,77
100134422738;96;15;25;;BREHMER, WOLFGANG:;;;25500,00
190869410326;07;69;00;;BREIER, BERND:;;;2911,13
180266417757;18;32;00;;BREIER, DETLEF:;;;18396,00
270837415325;08;08;00;;BREINIG, KLAUS-PETER:;;;26250,00
010563400634;01;00;42;;BREINLINGER, FRANK:;;;17820,00
150967400619;01;00;49;;BREINLINGER, JENS:;;;12775,00
040369407020;94;03;00;;BREIT, RALF:;;;9510,00
300359400843;96;15;13;;BREITBARTH, JENS-UWE:;;;19347,50
240358417721;09;00;40;;BREITBARTH, LUTZ:;;;17820,00
240140400820;99;40;00;;BREITBARTH, MANFRED:;;;21937,50
070661500828;99;77;00;;BREITBARTH, MARION:;;;18070,34
231062400811;01;69;00;;BREITBARTH, PETER:;;;15620,00
120130430077;18;25;00;;BREITBARTH, RICHARD:;;;28500,00
080962430084;94;65;00;;BREITBARTH, STEFFEN:;;;16170,00
130940500814;99;40;00;;BREITBARTH, URSULA:;;;20032,50
290549416911;09;06;00;;BREITBARTH, WILFRIED:;;;25125,00
260641429718;99;12;00;;BREITE, MANFRED:;;;23937,50
240154524971;97;01;00;;BREITE, SUSANNE:;;;19313,80
120759404212;03;14;00;;BREITENFELD, WOLF-DIETER:;;;15181,50
281255400215;01;00;42;;BREITENFELDT, DETLEF:;;;22440,00
060658408546;98;83;00;;BREITENSTEIN, FRANK:;;;20182,50
071052411728;07;26;00;;BREITENSTEIN, HORST:;;;20010,00
050363412258;97;06;00;;BREITENSTEIN, RONALD:;;;14650,40
110156414738;99;43;00;;BREITER, HANS-GUENTER:;;;19320,00
080458413226;98;82;00;;BREITER, PETER:;;;18227,50
200569426218;18;34;00;;BREITFELD, GISO:;;;9675,00
230557404828;99;02;00;;BREITFELD, HANS:;;;24150,00
250268415115;08;69;00;;BREITFELD, UWE:;;;9875,00
110367530173;96;15;06;;BREITFELDT, INES:;;;13675,00
101238406120;04;06;00;;BREITGOFF, KLAUS:;;;24000,00
200835418211;10;00;44;;BREITHAUPT, KARL-HEINZ:;;;19875,00
291133416218;09;06;00;;BREITHAUPT, WALTER:;;;21583,36
071053419051;99;40;00;;BREITHECKER, GERO:;;;24225,00
250263522114;12;96;67;;BREITING, INA:;;;15757,50
061259422118;94;03;00;;BREITING, PETER:;;;22770,00
190450423646;14;18;00;;BREITKOPF, RAINER:;;;29625,00
290260405912;97;07;00;;BREITKREUTZ, BORIS:;;;17030,00
100854406111;04;00;40;;BREITKREUTZ, GERHARD:;;;19800,00
121041429730;98;82;00;;BREITKREUZ, HORST:;;;20625,00
301068411221;18;35;00;;BREITLAUCH, DIRK:;;;9675,00
090935417756;09;12;00;;BREITLAUCH, WERNER:;;;26250,00
140762415148;99;40;00;;BREITMANN, GOETZ:;;;19415,00
140762415121;15;69;00;;BREITMANN, JOST:;;;17077,50
210141522435;99;43;00;;BREITREITER, HELGA:;;;23250,00
280240422417;95;45;00;;BREITREITER, KARL-HELMUT:;;;37500,00
091270421228;18;33;00;;BREITREITER, THOMAS:;;;2720,00
051050421211;99;99;99;::;BREITREITER, UWE;1140;BA(E)RENSTEINSTR. 6;
051050421211;99;99;99;::;BREITREITER, UWE;1140;BA(E)RENSTEINSTR. 6;
070746530030;30;83;00;;BREITSCHUH, GISELA:;;;18060,00
190750429767;30;47;00;;BREITSCHUH, JUERGEN:;;;17280,00
310367413934;08;07;00;;BREITSCHWERDT, GOTTHARD:;;;15390,00
010344516610;97;01;00;;BREITSPRECHER, CHRISTEL:;;;21000,00
211268405230;04;69;00;;BREITSPRECHER, DIRK:;;;9675,00
160571418440;98;83;00;;BREITSPRECHER, JOERG-DIETMAR:;;;3020,00
200556403623;18;32;00;;BREITSPRECHER, JUERGEN:;;;18630,00
010571414120;18;28;00;;BREITSPRECHER, MARCO:;;;2720,00
061057430152;94;65;00;;BREITSPRECHER, PETER:;;;19665,00
261263403610;03;80;00;;BREITSPRECHER, RAINER:;;;15592,50
041144416617;09;00;45;;BREITSPRECHER, SIEGFRIED:;;;29250,00
180968413814;18;32;00;;BREITUNG, JENS:;;;9675,00
131270428212;18;35;00;;BREITZKE, ANDRE:;;;2795,00
291148401326;01;02;00;;BREITZKE, ROLF:;;;26162,50
240169403435;03;69;00;;BREMER, ANDREAS:;;;9510,00
240169411427;18;31;00;;BREMER, ANDREAS:;;;9600,00
130655503610;03;14;00;;BREMER, BRITTA:;;;17681,17
080139429722;15;69;00;;BREMER, DIETER:;;;33000,00
270450402431;02;00;47;;BREMER, DIETER:;;;16920,00
280868402411;02;69;00;;BREMER, HEIKO:;;;9555,00
110763530140;30;83;00;;BREMER, IRIS:;;;12197,15
260164430088;98;84;00;;BREMER, JENS:;;;18095,00
200234429716;96;15;14;;BREMER, KARL-HEINZ:;;;22500,00
220436404216;03;09;00;;BREMER, KURT:;;;24750,00
070249401713;94;03;00;;BREMER, MANFRED:;;;26220,00
120670429720;99;40;00;;BREMER, MIRKO:;;;2870,00
261249403913;03;26;00;;BREMER, ROBERT:;;;22275,00
020643402428;02;18;00;;BREMER, WILFRIED:;;;29250,00
160654403316;03;14;00;;BREMER, WOLFGANG:;;;18480,00
270562400836;01;19;69;;BREMERKAMP, FALK:;;;19305,00
140840510117;07;00;44;;BREMERT, ILSE:;;;22500,00
090138410113;07;00;44;;BREMERT, KLAUS:;;;18875,00
040460530011;99;77;00;;BREMERT, UTE:;;;19140,00
200251416116;05;03;00;;BREMME, KLAUS-DIETER:;;;22275,00
140555419031;10;55;00;;BREMME, WOLFGANG:;;;20100,00
151259517554;30;61;00;;BREMMERT, KATHRIN:;;;10696,78
250244430054;07;51;00;;BREMSE, JUERGEN:;;;22500,00
050963409538;99;02;00;;BRENDAHL, THOMAS:;;;19470,00
140459421713;10;00;51;;BRENDEL, ALEXANDER:;;;12675,00
151158425079;30;36;00;;BRENDEL, ANDREAS:;;;18487,00
220352507912;99;02;00;;BRENDEL, INGEBORG:;;;24480,49
090468407515;05;19;00;;BRENDEL, JOERG:;;;9872,00
010153421520;06;15;00;;BRENDEL, JUERGEN:;;;26400,00
090945428918;14;00;54;;BRENDEL, JUERGEN:;;;26640,00
070553504119;06;55;00;;BRENDEL, JUTTA:;;;21480,00
301146429719;97;22;00;;BRENDEL, KLAUS:;;;20625,00
060146430045;15;08;00;;BRENDEL, PETER:;;;24000,00
160353506119;30;56;00;;BRENDEL, URSULA:;;;13530,00
131246428212;99;02;00;;BRENDEL, WERNER:;;;27375,00
191254422712;12;00;40;;BRENDEL, WOLFGANG:;;;20700,00
100238404315;97;06;00;;BRENDEMUEHL, HELMUT:;;;24562,50
080868420517;18;32;00;;BRENDLER, ANDREAS:;;;6958,87
140651422257;98;85;00;;BRENDLER, ARNDT:;;;19440,00
310338404510;96;15;22;;BRENDLER, JOACHIM:;;;30000,00
090170404522;18;34;00;;BRENDLER, RENE:;;;10810,00
260960404518;97;01;00;;BRENDLER, STEFAN:;;;22934,35
051168400512;17;00;00;;BRENDTNER, JOERG:;;;8950,00
230342400512;01;07;00;4733/88, :;BRENDTNER, WERNER;2520;HERMANN-MATERN-STR. 16;
230342400512;01;07;00;4733/88, :;BRENDTNER, WERNER;2520;HERMANN-MATERN-STR. 16;
180152407614;15;09;00;;BRENNECKE, BURKHARDT:;;;26100,00
040569407615;97;06;00;;BRENNECKE, JOERG:;;;13750,00
240837411917;97;97;11;;BRENNECKE, ROLF:;;;35250,00
010647411525;04;19;00;;BRENNECKE, ROLF-DIETER:;;;23545,00
041137511915;94;03;00;;BRENNECKE, SIGRID:;;;22927,09
250142430061;18;40;00;;BRENNER, HEINZ:;;;24750,00
200553428219;14;00;41;;BRENNER, JUERGEN:;;;25200,00
180460402516;02;18;00;;BRENNER, LUTZ:;;;9120,00
050160430181;15;80;00;;BRENNER, WOLF-EKKEHARD:;;;17940,00
220449524727;96;15;31;;BRENNIG, BRIGITTE:;;;21600,00
040250429804;97;01;00;;BRENNIG, KLAUS:;;;29250,00
090451503420;03;41;00;;BRENTFUEHRER, MARLIES:;;;19980,00
171147403411;03;09;00;;BRENTFUEHRER, UWE:;;;24000,00
110947410610;97;01;00;;BRENZ, GERT-JOACHIM:;;;35250,00
201051411518;12;06;00;;BRESCH, HANS:;;;21975,00
280355511014;07;06;00;;BRESCH, KARIN:;;;19320,00
090254411017;07;06;00;;BRESCH, PETER:;;;20160,00
140248400816;30;43;00;;BRESEMANN, HANS-PETER:;;;17876,00
050649400228;99;12;00;;BRESEMANN, KLAUS:;;;32530,65
280155400248;99;12;00;;BRESEMANN, VOLKER:;;;21700,00
210571400892;01;06;22;;BRESIEN, MICHAEL:;;;2896,61
210160430069;15;20;00;;BRESKI, JUERGEN:;;;24150,00
230358525053;13;53;00;;BRESLER, ANKE:;;;16431,32
220647424911;13;65;00;;BRESLER, CLAUS:;;;26250,00
110856424320;13;26;00;;BRESLER, DIETMAR:;;;22965,50
300852520320;11;12;00;;BRESLER, ILONA:;;;20180,00
200867424958;18;41;30;;BRESLER, MICHAEL:;;;13200,00
160951420315;11;00;40;;BRESLER, NORBERT:;;;25200,00
180551417721;09;00;40;;BRESSA, KLAUS-DETLEF:;;;26400,00
150939402115;02;06;00;;BRESSEL, DIETER:;;;26250,00
290358530308;94;30;00;;BRESSEL, TATJANA:;;;16239,79
110758408810;94;03;00;;BRESSEM, HARALD:;;;22597,50
230553403713;94;65;00;;BRESSIN, HELMUT:;;;19440,00
070468430127;98;27;00;;BRESSLER, FRANK:;;;14332,00
210334530060;96;15;11;;BRESSLER, LIESELOTTE:;;;22620,00
290734429714;99;43;00;;BRESTRICH, WOLFGANG:;;;27000,00
230456421215;12;00;48;;BRESZLER, HANS-JUERGEN:;;;16276,50
280651426527;04;00;42;;BRESZLER, KLAUS:;;;21485,81
291142429715;99;43;00;;BRETERNITZ, DIETER:;;;24000,00
300955412218;08;20;00;;BRETERNITZ, FRED:;;;23975,00
310768413927;18;40;00;;BRETERNITZ, JO(E)RG:;;;10155,00
300463430217;99;77;00;;BRETERNITZ, UWE:;;;17572,50
290149418432;99;55;00;;BRETERNITZ, WILFRIED:;;;25500,00
241142429728;97;06;00;;BRETFELD, HERMANN:;;;24000,00
200941428229;14;02;00;;BRETFELD, KLAUS:;;;28500,00
251053429223;14;65;00;;BRETSCHNEIDER, CHRISTIAN:;;;19860,00
140548428220;96;15;18;;BRETSCHNEIDER, CHRISTIAN:;;;27360,00
250458430148;99;02;00;;BRETSCHNEIDER, DETLEF:;;;21562,50
030934429718;97;01;00;;BRETSCHNEIDER, DIETER:;;;27750,00
050158421817;12;06;00;;BRETSCHNEIDER, DIETER:;;;19320,00
290663427016;14;51;00;;BRETSCHNEIDER, DIRK:;;;17792,50
250371403622;18;29;30;;BRETSCHNEIDER, DIRK:;;;3070,16
060635429723;94;03;00;;BRETSCHNEIDER, EBERHARDT:;;;24000,00
171239429723;94;30;00;;BRETSCHNEIDER, EGON:;;;26750,00
101144425005;30;47;00;;BRETSCHNEIDER, FRANZ:;;;28780,00
270668421010;18;32;00;;BRETSCHNEIDER, GERALD:;;;9675,00
080268417760;18;35;00;;BRETSCHNEIDER, GERD:;;;10775,00
150542429774;99;77;00;;BRETSCHNEIDER, GERT:;;;24000,00
141036426218;14;03;00;;BRETSCHNEIDER, GUENTER:;;;23250,00
181255422715;94;65;00;;BRETSCHNEIDER, GUENTER:;;;17595,00
250844406728;05;00;41;;BRETSCHNEIDER, GUNTER:;;;27540,00
090455425028;13;20;00;;BRETSCHNEIDER, HARALD:;;;24880,00
150438530071;99;40;00;;BRETSCHNEIDER, HELGA:;;;17595,00
191152529770;30;83;00;;BRETSCHNEIDER, ILONA:;;;17432,26
130930530024;98;83;00;;BRETSCHNEIDER, ILSE:;;;19170,00
290959429213;15;19;00;;BRETSCHNEIDER, INGO:;;;21560,00
211068421818;18;33;00;;BRETSCHNEIDER, JAN:;;;9675,00
211165430214;97;08;00;;BRETSCHNEIDER, JAN:;;;16656,50
290867427210;14;08;00;182, :;BRETSCHNEIDER, JENS;9271;AM HANG 3;
290867427210;14;08;00;182, :;BRETSCHNEIDER, JENS;9271;AM HANG 3;
091069420928;18;34;00;;BRETSCHNEIDER, JO(E)RG:;;;10500,00
080168506731;05;00;40;;BRETSCHNEIDER, KERSTIN:;;;14382,00
160251400612;05;00;41;;BRETSCHNEIDER, KLAUS:;;;24140,00
251258408944;06;65;00;;BRETSCHNEIDER, MICHAEL:;;;17825,00
010943530369;98;83;00;;BRETSCHNEIDER, MONIKA:;;;20309,36
040668409819;18;31;00;;BRETSCHNEIDER, NICO:;;;9825,00
120257520010;97;22;00;;BRETSCHNEIDER, REGINA:;;;17448,10
140135422728;12;03;00;;BRETSCHNEIDER, SIEGFRIED:;;;31437,50
031151429783;99;43;00;;BRETSCHNEIDER, THOMAS:;;;23040,00
260165426232;14;00;47;;BRETSCHNEIDER, TORSTEN:;;;18881,00
250366530221;96;15;14;;BRETSCHNEIDER, UTA:;;;12920,00
220570415119;18;31;00;;BRETSCHNEIDER, VOLKER:;;;6705,00
070268406712;05;69;00;;BRETSCHNER, JOERG:;;;9675,00
230559407010;11;18;00;;BRETTIN, BODO:;;;20189,00
300156517718;99;02;00;;BRETTIN, PETRA:;;;20137,98
240954429710;94;94;00;;BRETTIN, RALF:;;;29670,00
050358407016;05;08;00;;BRETTIN, UWE:;;;20240,00
020951409314;06;00;45;;BRETTSCHNEIDER, GU(E)NTER:;;;21065,00
301146422410;12;00;47;;BRETTSCHNEIDER, HANS:;;;21812,50
050543427916;30;34;00;;BRETTSCHNEIDER, RAINER:;;;23200,00
121053406413;18;80;00;;BRETZKE, KLAUS-DIETER:;;;19980,00
101135429717;15;08;00;;BREU, DIETER:;;;27187,50
070369503212;03;09;00;;BREU, KERSTIN:;;;13000,00
050242429731;98;18;00;;BREUCKER, PETER:;;;30750,00
270869430044;18;32;00;;BREUCKER, TORSTEN:;;;9510,00
030334429722;97;08;00;;BREUDEL, GUENTER:;;;28500,00
271063406410;04;00;42;;BREUER, ANDREAS:;;;16227,00
131068430044;99;02;00;;BREUER, CARSTEN:;;;14475,00
160244429724;99;40;00;;BREUER, FRANK:;;;40312,50
240352429799;97;01;00;;BREUER, HARTMUT:;;;21700,00
310838408219;06;00;42;;BREUER, HEINZ:;;;26875,00
120641429713;97;17;00;;BREUER, HEINZ:;;;28500,00
050167421712;99;12;00;;BREUER, JAN:;;;15606,00
050458420330;97;08;00;;BREUER, JUERGEN:;;;17940,00
070665408228;99;43;00;;BREUER, KLAUS:;;;15463,50
191147419614;11;03;00;;BREUER, LOTHAR:;;;26875,02
250461421728;99;43;00;;BREUER, MARIO:;;;17820,00
280959411815;04;06;00;;BREUER, REINER:;;;19952,50
150465430236;98;83;00;;BREUER, RONALD:;;;16623,00
140431429721;98;83;00;;BREUER, WALTER:;;;21750,00
031048405310;04;00;45;;BREUHAHN, JOACHIM:;;;23760,00
150554504823;04;00;45;;BREUHAHN, SIGRID:;;;18912,82
080643429756;97;06;00;;BREUL, BERND:;;;24000,00
270768411928;18;33;00;;BREUM, JO(E)RG:;;;10575,00
210369408313;18;32;00;;BREUNINGER, JO(E)RG:;;;9675,00
150953426519;14;51;00;;BREY, WOLFGANG:;;;29111,62
260747517716;09;06;00;;BREYER, ILONA:;;;22000,00
041242429737;99;43;00;;BREYER, JUERGEN:;;;21750,00
140546417720;09;09;00;;BREYER, LOTHAR:;;;33187,50
250735430067;96;15;05;;BREYER, LOTHAR:;;;28500,00
190539529711;96;15;12;;BREYER, MONIKA:;;;24155,65
191052429799;99;43;00;;BREYER, ULRICH:;;;24480,00
240251417166;09;51;00;;BREYER, WILFRID:;;;21240,00
160968411212;18;33;00;;BREYMANN, NICO:;;;9600,00
171234405319;04;00;49;;BREYVOGEL, OTTMAR:;;;19560,48
300829407522;05;00;40;;BREZINSKI, HORST:;;;27000,00
221149402722;02;00;45;;BREZMANN, GERHARD:;;;23402,50
040142429786;98;50;00;;BRIEBSCH, EBERHARD:;;;37500,00
230461430247;94;03;00;;BRIEBSCH, ERIK:;;;17160,00
110169430075;98;84;00;;BRIEBSCH, RONALD:;;;14425,00
091061419033;10;08;00;;BRIEGER, ANDREE:;;;17820,00
280755406715;97;22;00;;BRIEGER, KLAUS-DIETER:;;;27700,00
251157528226;99;13;00;;BRIEGER, MARGITTA:;;;17531,75
280257427126;99;13;00;;BRIEGER, STEPHAN:;;;21390,00
261261430092;98;85;00;;BRIEN, JOERG:;;;17820,00
071259430061;97;08;00;;BRIEN, MICHAEL:;;;21026,52
160862530221;97;08;00;;BRIEN, UTE:;;;16169,10
140534429732;99;43;00;;BRIEN, WERNER:;;;27750,00
050747430068;30;58;00;;BRIER, ARMIN:;;;17760,48
280346425018;13;00;40;;BRIER, KARL-HEINZ:;;;33187,50
240266422814;60;90;00;;BRIER, ROLAND:;;;
240266422814;60;90;00;;BRIER, ROLAND:;;;15732,00
211148530117;30;84;00;;BRIER, SIGRID:;;;16560,00
170954424046;30;47;00;;BRIESE, ANDREAS:;;;18758,67
010158424034;30;32;00;;BRIESE, HOLGER:;;;13923,15
190869410414;07;18;00;;BRIESE, JENS:;;;8300,00
200956403710;30;58;00;;BRIESE, JUERGEN:;;;16934,00
141149400217;01;80;00;;BRIESE, JUERGEN:;;;22320,00
250861506114;03;15;00;;BRIESE, KAREN:;;;16665,00
280259530012;30;80;00;;BRIESE, PETRA:;;;3182,90
020952529748;30;76;00;;BRIESE, SIGRID:;;;9465,64
040351408316;06;60;00;;BRIESEMANN, BERND:;;;20182,50
070668408311;97;01;00;;BRIESEMANN, DIRK:;;;8812,50
080456500027;99;40;00;;BRIESEMEISTER, EIKE:;;;18329,19
250656400847;18;32;00;;BRIESEMEISTER, HARALD:;;;29670,00
010345408013;18;33;00;;BRIESEMEISTER, KLAUS:;;;23040,00
240956506134;30;47;00;;BRIESENICK, ILONA:;;;20233,50
110659404013;03;11;00;;BRIESKORN, BERND:;;;19320,00
220363406412;04;14;00;;BRIESKORN, RENE:;;;16170,00
180341406418;04;00;42;;BRIESKORN, WOLFGANG:;;;29250,00
240639417760;09;00;40;;BRIESNER, GERD:;;;30000,00
131142517712;09;60;00;;BRIESNER, RENATE:;;;20750,00
150433405714;04;00;52;;BRIEST, FRITZ:;;;18250,00
250969425068;18;35;00;;BRIEST, HANS-JOERG:;;;10287,08
090860403156;30;62;00;;BRIETZKE, PETER:;;;15251,00
160351429762;30;55;00;;BRILLAT, BERND:;;;3600,00
050752404411;99;12;00;;BRINCKMANN, UWE:;;;21395,00
080659530023;96;15;11;;BRINGER, GABRIELE:;;;17808,29
150358430070;99;26;00;;BRINGER, KLAUS-DIETER:;;;19745,00
261059430013;96;15;14;;BRINGEZU, MARIO:;;;21562,50
010446430041;96;15;07;;BRINGMANN, MATTHIAS:;;;29520,00
200832406928;30;50;00;;BRINGMANN, OTTO:;;;18720,00
070455415315;08;80;00;;BRINK, MATTHIAS:;;;17940,00
270144421327;97;06;00;;BRINKE, FRANK:;;;24000,00
150253510015;07;06;00;;BRINKE, HELGA:;;;20104,00
251232400821;97;01;00;;BRINKEL, GEORG:;;;25687,50
101269400848;01;06;20;;BRINKHOFF, FRANK:;;;12650,00
060161420312;09;03;00;;BRINKMANN, ANDREAS:;;;19277,50
030562430231;98;83;00;;BRINKMANN, BERND:;;;18397,50
040144429747;99;43;00;;BRINKMANN, DETLEF:;;;27750,00
020842429738;98;82;00;;BRINKMANN, GERHARD:;;;17398,39
300751429755;94;03;00;;BRINKMANN, HANS-JOERG:;;;20870,00
110958402747;18;71;25;;BRINKMANN, JOERG:;;;20182,50
080654403244;18;71;10;;BRINKMANN, LOTHAR:;;;20160,00
270371415744;18;33;00;;BRINKMANN, MARKO:;;;2795,00
250251400216;01;06;27;;BRINKMANN, MARTIN:;;;19740,00
110567530143;99;53;00;;BRINKMANN, PETRA:;;;16470,00
240652529812;99;53;00;;BRINKMANN, REGINA:;;;26634,82
010441530051;98;83;00;;BRINKMANN, RUTH:;;;19440,00
311230530018;99;09;00;;BRINKMANN, SIEGLINDE:;;;23250,00
110230430016;97;01;00;;BRINKMANN, WILLY:;;;24750,00
190160409221;99;43;00;;BRITZE, FRANK:;;;21332,50
250166409224;99;43;00;;BRITZE, STEFFEN:;;;16038,00
140858411811;05;00;43;;BRIX, ERHARD:;;;21780,00
180966406119;17;00;00;;BRIX, THORSTEN:;;;9872,00
111253414734;99;14;00;;BRIXEL, HEINZ:;;;27360,00
260755503736;99;09;00;;BRIXEL, SIGRID:;;;17860,29
180965404138;99;14;00;;BRO(E)CKER, FRED:;;;11169,00
090670404422;18;32;00;;BRO(E)CKER, JO(E)RG:;;;2795,00
150466513922;18;80;00;;BRO(E)CKERT, ANNETTE:;;;15660,00
220969413123;18;31;00;;BRO(E)DEL, HOLGER:;;;9510,00
030863424927;08;80;00;;BRO(E)DEL, STEFFEN:;;;15294,59
230263424938;07;06;00;;BRO(E)DNER, KARSTEN:;;;17820,00
140467413967;99;55;00;;BRO(E)MEL, STEFFEN:;;;16092,00
150670406411;18;35;00;;BRO(E)SECKE, ANDRE:;;;6705,00
261154417757;09;20;00;;BROAETER, HANS-JUERGEN:;;;23312,50
031137429736;99;09;00;;BROCK, DIETER:;;;28500,00
270230506917;99;43;00;;BROCK, GISELA:;;;20625,00
160559412222;01;03;00;;BROCK, HOLGER:;;;17997,50
101053406917;99;43;00;;BROCK, KLAUS-DIETER:;;;19440,00
050758410847;94;03;00;;BROCK, REINER:;;;21390,00
120470422743;18;33;00;;BROCK, STEFFEN:;;;9986,44
190733514513;08;96;00;;BROCKE, ANITA:;;;17460,00
111038517749;09;14;00;;BROCKE, MARGARETE:;;;18572,50
290168406445;17;00;00;;BROCKE, TOM:;;;8950,00
150756417744;97;01;00;;BROCKE, UDO:;;;25530,00
030358517719;09;07;00;;BROCKE, VERA:;;;17223,17
080271412119;18;33;00;;BROCKEL, ANDREAS:;;;2795,00
121268400852;18;35;00;;BROCKHAUSEN, JENS:;;;9327,00
081068402112;02;69;00;;BROCKHOFF, PETER:;;;9875,00
241155402428;02;00;47;;BROCKMANN, BERND:;;;22770,00
270257411926;07;00;57;;BROCKMANN, HELMUT:;;;15525,00
030550405012;04;08;00;;BROCKMANN, JOACHIM:;;;22500,00
041162400619;30;61;00;;BROCKMANN, JOERG:;;;14355,00
290962420914;12;00;44;;BROCKMANN, OLAF:;;;13932,00
260237400884;01;06;23;;BROCKMANN, WINFRIED:;;;24000,00
250259408538;97;08;00;;BROCKSCH, ULLRICH:;;;22080,00
310538522722;12;08;00;;BROD, MARGA:;;;17940,00
110959411442;07;00;53;;BRODA, MARIO:;;;22770,00
170948430060;15;08;00;;BRODDA, WILFRIED:;;;23760,00
290948522762;94;30;00;;BRODE, CHRISTINE:;;;20640,00
141062423918;99;43;00;;BRODE, DETLEF:;;;17600,00
101248429748;94;30;00;;BRODE, HARTMUT:;;;22770,00
171067430065;94;30;00;;BRODE, STEPHAN:;;;8950,00
010953402723;02;03;00;;BRODEHL, PETER:;;;24480,00
130841429725;97;08;00;;BRODEHL, ROLF-WERNER:;;;26250,00
250338529717;96;15;10;;BRODEHL, SIEGRID:;;;21937,50
110568430144;99;02;00;;BRODEHL, UWE:;;;14994,00
120754410111;94;03;00;;BRODIEN, GERNOT:;;;20010,00
260168412266;18;32;00;;BRODMANN, DIRK:;;;10621,77
071250520052;30;37;00;;BRODOWSKI, BIANKA:;;;16686,00
240868408542;06;00;46;;BRODOWSKI, THOMAS:;;;12825,00
310147420016;30;37;00;;BRODOWSKI, WOLFRAM:;;;20160,00
130129420313;11;00;40;;BRODRECHT, GERHARD:;;;23250,00
030542419617;11;51;00;;BRODRECHT, JUERGEN:;;;21000,00
181148428927;97;01;00;;BROECKEL, KLAUS:;;;23040,00
200968430097;15;80;00;;BROECKER, RAINER:;;;14750,00
120344429717;97;08;00;;BROECKER, ULRICH:;;;25500,00
240451430058;98;84;00;;BROEDE, WOLFGANG:;;;20100,00
260568413954;99;43;00;;BROEDEL, JOERG:;;;13500,00
040566513922;08;19;00;;BROEDEL, PETRA:;;;13179,42
120252424214;99;02;00;;BROEDNER, INGO:;;;26547,50
020761428119;14;80;00;;BROEDNER, LUTZ:;;;16472,50
311056428113;99;13;00;;BROEDNER, NORBERT:;;;19665,00
010564430085;18;29;30;;BROEGE, AXEL:;;;11220,00
020338430094;18;71;20;;BROEGE, WOLFGANG:;;;24150,00
190166409919;07;00;50;;BROEHL, THOMAS:;;;14812,50
130440411110;07;00;51;;BROEKER, ROLF:;;;29250,00
191057413980;08;20;00;;BROEMEL, INGOLF:;;;23205,00
081268419330;05;69;00;;BROEMEL, SILVIO:;;;9675,00
080357430115;98;18;00;;BROEMME, ANDREAS:;;;26392,50
010230530019;99;02;00;;BROEMME, ILSE:;;;24750,00
060941415426;08;00;40;;BROEMME, JUERGEN:;;;27750,00
051156530141;99;53;00;;BROEMME, MARGRET:;;;21551,13
111231429724;99;09;00;;BROEMME, RUDI:;;;33000,00
190254417513;97;29;00;;BROEMMER, EGBERT:;;;23940,00
070753526339;99;77;00;;BROEMMER, GABRIELE:;;;31680,00
290668415129;08;14;00;;BROEMMLING, DIRK:;;;12130,00
010368402327;97;08;00;;BROER, ANDREAS:;;;15221,00
091030430010;97;08;00;;BROESE, HEINZ:;;;28500,00
270654520720;99;77;00;;BROESE, KARIN:;;;22770,00
241231530051;97;06;00;;BROESE, MARGARETE:;;;21375,00
190848411514;07;06;00;;BROESEL, GUENTER:;;;20562,50
020653511222;07;80;00;;BROESEL, HELGA:;;;18000,00
031233505110;30;54;00;;BROESICKE, JOHANNA:;;;22680,00
091036405115;30;54;00;;BROESICKE, WOLFGANG:;;;26700,00
161139429719;99;43;00;;BROETZMANN, HANS-JOACHIM:;;;23187,50
190241406110;17;00;00;;BROHMANN, WILLI:;;;20700,00
040548402719;02;00;49;;BROMBACH, GUENTER:;;;24375,00
110537400823;01;55;00;;BROMBERG, FRITZ:;;;22500,00
051060408424;97;29;00;;BROMBERG, JOERG:;;;24062,90
220867404218;03;00;44;;BROMBERG, MAIK:;;;13982,00
100247424617;99;02;00;;BROMME, HANS-WERNER:;;;27360,00
241068423618;99;43;00;;BROMME, JOERG:;;;9825,00
240452424610;14;80;00;;BROMME, KARL-HEINZ:;;;14372,13
201132430032;15;20;00;;BRONDER, MANFRED:;;;37500,00
220939530054;15;00;41;;BRONDER, MARLIS:;;;23937,50
170170421314;18;35;00;;BRONDER, TIMO:;;;9600,00
280168409815;07;08;00;;BRONESKE, HARALD:;;;11758,00
260959404115;99;43;00;;BRONEWSKI, WERNER:;;;16830,00
050459422792;12;06;00;;BRONNER, UWE:;;;19780,00
220769418915;10;06;00;;BRONST, THOMAS:;;;12555,00
190645411522;07;06;00;;BROSCH, EDUARD:;;;21687,50
311041429711;99;51;00;;BROSCH, FRITZ:;;;26250,00
250435502719;02;65;00;;BROSCH, HANNA:;;;19500,00
160755402718;02;02;00;;BROSCH, PETER:;;;22080,00
051056430071;99;51;00;;BROSCH, PETER:;;;24725,00
010358430113;99;09;00;;BROSCH, RAINER:;;;22252,50
160169404411;98;85;00;;BROSCHE, FRANK:;;;9675,00
021249413414;13;00;43;;BROSCHE, FRANK:;;;26910,00
180537504415;03;00;40;;BROSCHE, HELENE:;;;16031,25
210566422843;12;65;00;;BROSCHE, KLAUS:;;;14580,00
251232422721;12;60;00;;BROSCHE, RUDOLF:;;;36000,00
040261422771;12;20;00;;BROSCHE, RUDOLF:;;;19745,00
241260530026;94;03;00;;BROSCHIES, MARINA:;;;16847,50
290739408912;06;00;54;;BROSE, GUENTER:;;;29700,00
100657411819;07;00;56;;BROSE, HARALD:;;;22942,50
151058430225;94;11;00;;BROSE, NORBERT:;;;21275,00
210371407619;18;32;00;;BROSE, STEFFEN:;;;2795,00
040171408423;18;32;00;;BROSE, STEFFEN:;;;2795,00
191161403715;03;07;00;;BROSE, UWE:;;;21120,00
161124430012;96;15;14;;BROSE, WALTER:;;;33000,00
180268424838;99;43;00;;BROSGE, SVEN:;;;9600,00
261255412218;94;03;00;;BROSIG, FRANK-ULRICH:;;;20010,00
030661404127;96;15;12;;BROSIG, STEFFEN:;;;20278,79
211069427111;14;69;00;;BROSIG, TORSTEN:;;;12085,00
041149524940;13;20;00;;BROSINSKY, ANGELA:;;;21540,00
231065503736;05;08;00;;BROSINSKY, CORNELIA:;;;7598,31
270968403746;99;43;00;;BROSINSKY, JAN:;;;14425,00
120467403728;05;80;00;;BROSINSKY, RENE:;;;15390,00
250462408525;15;15;00;;BROSIUS, BURKHARD:;;;21450,00
180334429726;99;43;00;;BROSIUS, HERBERT:;;;24750,00
140759406910;94;65;00;;BROSIUS, THOMAS:;;;17745,00
290847529711;99;40;00;;BROSK, BAERBEL:;;;22687,50
010348429725;97;06;00;;BROSK, WOLFGANG:;;;24750,00
240336429748;94;03;00;;BROSKE, HORST:;;;27750,00
221060413628;98;84;00;;BROSOWSKY, HANS-ULRICH:;;;17700,00
050347400812;01;65;00;;BROSTOWSKI, DETLEF:;;;21270,82
230459430088;30;61;00;;BROSY, JOERG:;;;16575,00
310149407616;05;03;00;;BROSZ, GERD:;;;26250,00
190933530067;97;08;00;;BROSZAT, CHRISTEL:;;;19125,00
110632430078;97;08;00;;BROSZAT, HANS-GUENTER:;;;21750,00
140957404844;04;00;50;;BROSZIO, THOMAS:;;;16215,00
230741410814;10;07;00;;BROSZMANN, HARALD:;;;30750,00
101167410324;08;69;00;;BROTHUHN, ULF:;;;6025,00
091236416214;09;00;43;;BROTMEYER, ROLF:;;;28937,50
240270406120;04;18;00;;BROXTERMANN, ANDREAS:;;;2700,00
120747406130;04;41;00;;BROXTERMANN, JUERGEN:;;;31500,00
200443518520;99;40;00;;BROYER, EDELTRAUT:;;;22125,00
010470419328;97;22;00;;BROYER, HEIKO:;;;9930,00
110136418520;95;60;12;;BROYER, KLAUS:;;;33000,00
060670415036;18;33;00;;BRU(E)CKNER, DIRK:;;;9551,61
111270426534;18;35;00;;BRU(E)CKNER, ENRICO:;;;2795,00
130968417334;18;80;00;;BRU(E)CKNER, JENS:;;;9825,00
100169428910;18;33;00;;BRU(E)CKNER, JO(E)RG:;;;2720,00
051035407219;18;25;00;;BRU(E)CKNER, KARL-HEINZ:;;;28687,50
141161419711;11;00;41;;BRU(E)CKNER, KLAUS:;;;15510,00
211062407513;04;00;54;;BRU(E)CKNER, STEFFEN:;;;21065,00
220571403320;18;33;00;;BRU(E)CKNER, STEFFEN:;;;2795,00
060968429246;18;32;00;;BRU(E)CKNER, SVEN:;;;9675,00
261168428916;18;32;00;;BRU(E)CKNER, TINO:;;;10025,00
220968424920;18;31;00;;BRU(E)DGAM, HENRY:;;;9600,00
090368406160;18;31;00;;BRU(E)GGEMANN, GERRIT:;;;9825,00
190770430634;18;31;00;;BRU(E)HL, JENS:;;;2795,00
110663402715;96;15;00;4361/84, M:;BRU(E)NING, FALK;1095;WARNEMU(E)NDER STR. 16;
110663402715;96;15;00;4361/84, M:;BRU(E)NING, FALK;1095;WARNEMU(E)NDER STR. 16;
141270427518;18;32;00;;BRU(E)NING, STEFAN:;;;2795,00
230668415036;18;34;00;;BRU(E)SCHKE, JENS:;;;10375,00
250955429738;30;47;00;;BRUCH, PETER:;;;23805,00
021061402123;02;08;00;;BRUCHE, DIETMAR:;;;18590,00
270859402111;02;26;00;;BRUCHE, JUERGEN:;;;20010,00
130362501718;02;26;00;;BRUCHE, PETRA:;;;10687,34
130970427347;18;40;00;;BRUCHHOLD, LUTZ:;;;6736,77
200655422723;12;26;00;;BRUCHHOLZ, HANS-PETER:;;;20412,50
280152403814;12;00;58;;BRUCHMANN, DETLEF:;;;23460,00
270752421814;12;41;00;;BRUCHMANN, FRANK:;;;31680,00
210538429722;97;06;00;;BRUCHMANN, PETER:;;;27125,00
070353518516;12;08;00;;BRUCHMANN, WALTRAUD:;;;2300,00
230662530084;99;77;00;;BRUCHMUELLER, HEIKE:;;;14594,95
040162414741;99;14;00;;BRUCHMUELLER, UWE:;;;20401,34
260556409915;95;60;24;;BRUCKE, ANDRE:;;;25600,00
050371431117;18;33;00;;BRUCKELT, STEFAN:;;;2795,00
180552506929;99;43;00;;BRUCKER, URSULA:;;;9987,75
091134429719;97;06;00;;BRUCKERT, ARTUR:;;;27595,84
300564410119;96;15;26;;BRUCKERT, TORSTEN:;;;16912,50
100662403629;99;02;00;;BRUCKHOFF, FRANK:;;;19085,00
060633403618;03;00;45;;BRUCKHOFF, HERBERT:;;;26250,00
090570400715;99;77;00;;BRUCKHOFF, MARIO:;;;2915,97
230465503116;03;80;00;;BRUCKSCH, CORINNA:;;;10611,40
120456522123;12;00;43;;BRUCKSCH, MARTINA:;;;5528,21
200340422112;12;00;54;;BRUCKSCH, WERNER:;;;27000,00
190737403116;03;00;50;;BRUCKSCH, WOLF-DIETER:;;;36000,00
060550413917;08;08;00;;BRUDER, KLAUS-DIETER:;;;18450,00
211033430052;18;27;30;;BRUDER, SIEGFRIED:;;;27000,00
051034529716;96;15;11;;BRUDER, SIGRID:;;;21937,50
041131403825;03;02;00;;BRUDNICKI, BRUNO:;;;17666,66
090370403823;97;06;00;;BRUDNICKI, DIRK:;;;9600,00
010268412237;07;06;00;;BRUDNICKI, JENS:;;;11600,00
100166417730;09;00;40;;BRUECK, JENS:;;;18764,40
091068420010;09;69;00;;BRUECK, STEFFEN:;;;9700,00
011243530055;30;47;00;;BRUECKHAENDLER, GITTA:;;;24140,00
070651507524;05;06;00;;BRUECKL, HANNELORE:;;;20040,00
170142507540;05;29;00;;BRUECKL, INGRID:;;;22500,00
121041407515;05;00;50;;BRUECKL, UWE:;;;25500,00
250264415126;97;01;00;;BRUECKMANN, HARTMUT:;;;10560,00
100163417719;94;03;00;;BRUECKMANN, MARIO:;;;18480,00
040362506915;99;77;00;;BRUECKMANN, STEFFI:;;;17796,11
020854421813;12;40;00;;BRUECKNER, ANDREAS:;;;22165,00
100268426814;99;02;00;;BRUECKNER, ANDREAS:;;;9872,00
290359506924;05;80;00;;BRUECKNER, BAERBEL:;;;17250,00
280852418419;97;01;00;;BRUECKNER, BERND:;;;31520,04
061148411926;99;43;00;;BRUECKNER, BERND:;;;27000,00
140240507213;18;29;00;;BRUECKNER, BRIGITTE:;;;19440,00
100250408538;97;22;00;;BRUECKNER, CHRISTIAN:;;;25500,00
061260530116;96;15;12;;BRUECKNER, DANIELA:;;;13895,95
091066426611;14;69;00;;BRUECKNER, DANIELO:;;;13860,00
150445421025;04;06;00;;BRUECKNER, DIETMAR:;;;23250,00
210869407317;99;43;00;;BRUECKNER, FRANK:;;;8350,00
231257422789;99;40;00;;BRUECKNER, FRANK:;;;22770,00
070260418516;94;03;00;;BRUECKNER, FRANK:;;;21562,50
261157419715;97;22;00;;BRUECKNER, GEORG:;;;24840,00
060552429218;01;80;00;;BRUECKNER, GUNTER:;;;18720,00
260642513612;99;40;00;;BRUECKNER, HANNELORE:;;;26815,00
110337520310;11;77;00;;BRUECKNER, HELLA:;;;25500,00
291252412228;07;08;00;;BRUECKNER, HENNING:;;;22320,00
070450411710;98;84;00;;BRUECKNER, HERBERT:;;;21532,50
071049515024;08;78;00;;BRUECKNER, ISABELLA:;;;20880,00
220165427415;99;43;00;;BRUECKNER, JENS:;;;16830,00
280747415013;08;64;00;;BRUECKNER, JOACHIM:;;;24750,00
220767419711;17;00;00;;BRUECKNER, JOERG:;;;8950,00
101046512914;18;96;00;;BRUECKNER, KAROLA:;;;19262,50
180653402715;02;00;48;;BRUECKNER, KLAUS:;;;25200,00
230267408927;06;69;00;;BRUECKNER, LARS:;;;11016,00
190333429715;99;53;00;;BRUECKNER, LOTHAR:;;;32062,50
010254418515;10;11;00;;BRUECKNER, LUTZ:;;;26640,00
071055422238;96;15;21;;BRUECKNER, LUTZ:;;;21822,50
120127418413;97;01;00;;BRUECKNER, MANFRED:;;;33500,04
021146421825;12;08;00;;BRUECKNER, MANFRED:;;;27000,00
050669415355;01;69;00;;BRUECKNER, MARCO:;;;6806,61
030635429726;97;06;00;;BRUECKNER, MARTIN:;;;23000,00
210657407438;18;29;00;;BRUECKNER, MATTHIAS:;;;24092,50
071156417745;99;55;00;;BRUECKNER, MICHAEL:;;;19435,00
151070413444;97;22;00;;BRUECKNER, MICHAEL:;;;3772,33
120753417792;09;12;00;;BRUECKNER, MICHAEL:;;;23220,00
220753428027;12;06;00;;BRUECKNER, PETER:;;;19040,00
151060501328;30;81;00;;BRUECKNER, RAMONA:;;;11491,54
011239413614;99;40;00;;BRUECKNER, ROBERT:;;;27000,00
140332420318;11;06;00;;BRUECKNER, ROLAND:;;;26250,00
141255429742;30;47;00;;BRUECKNER, ROLAND:;;;24942,50
210257417717;99;13;00;;BRUECKNER, RUEDIGER:;;;21045,00
130236530323;98;83;00;;BRUECKNER, RUTH:;;;18360,00
270939407211;94;03;00;;BRUECKNER, SIEGFRIED:;;;27750,00
061269419748;97;06;00;;BRUECKNER, STEFAN:;;;15150,00
070455403410;97;01;00;;BRUECKNER, STEFFEN:;;;25290,00
190270418428;99;43;00;;BRUECKNER, STEFFEN:;;;6780,00
230470419752;11;69;00;;BRUECKNER, STEPHAN:;;;2720,00
200369426512;14;69;00;;BRUECKNER, SVEN:;;;12675,00
011268415328;18;35;00;;BRUECKNER, SVEN:;;;10725,00
090468430125;99;77;00;;BRUECKNER, THOMAS:;;;9872,00
230464412300;97;01;00;;BRUECKNER, TINO:;;;16775,00
180571419644;99;43;00;;BRUECKNER, TORSTEN:;;;2870,00
241266400628;98;82;00;;BRUECKNER, VOLKER:;;;14946,00
050930407448;99;02;00;;BRUECKNER, WILLY:;;;42375,00
101164415330;08;08;00;;BRUEDER, MICHAEL:;;;16753,50
070945427714;13;51;00;;BRUEDERLEIN, BERND:;;;27000,00
150452506414;97;01;00;;BRUEGERT, CHRISTIANE:;;;18682,88
150354401328;04;43;00;;BRUEGERT, DETLEF:;;;21600,00
190951411256;98;20;00;;BRUEGGEMANN, DETLEF:;;;25080,00
021057408557;94;03;00;;BRUEGGEMANN, STEFFEN:;;;21332,50
300647406115;30;40;00;;BRUEGGENKAMP, DETLEV:;;;23320,00
200540403610;03;65;00;;BRUEGGER, SIEGFRIED:;;;22437,50
280658403416;99;55;00;;BRUEGGERT, HANS-JUERGEN:;;;18083,75
031254401919;02;00;43;;BRUEGGERT, RAINER:;;;22080,00
080966402726;94;03;00;;BRUEGGMANN, CAROL:;;;15498,00
050244502728;02;18;00;;BRUEGGMANN, EDELTRAUD:;;;17167,77
010236402712;02;02;00;;BRUEGGMANN, HARRY:;;;27000,00
280751513230;98;19;00;;BRUEGMANN, GISELA:;;;22030,00
181231429728;99;43;00;;BRUEHL, GERHARD:;;;27750,00
291070421115;99;43;00;;BRUEHL, HEIKO:;;;2480,32
020245521026;98;83;00;;BRUEHL, ILONA:;;;19780,00
240643421025;98;20;00;;BRUEHL, JUERGEN:;;;25920,00
131153427210;97;22;00;;BRUEHL, JUERGEN:;;;20880,00
121235429747;99;77;00;;BRUEHL, KURT:;;;20316,53
190657430050;94;03;00;;BRUEHL, MARIO:;;;21332,50
101257506127;99;77;00;;BRUEHL, MARTINA:;;;19043,66
290145429732;97;01;00;;BRUEHL, PETER:;;;30750,00
081239412228;07;78;00;;BRUEHL, PETER:;;;33750,00
130158406182;99;02;00;;BRUEHL, UWE:;;;25875,00
200834429736;98;83;00;;BRUEHL, WALTER:;;;23250,00
261264412914;94;03;00;;BRUEHMANN, PETER:;;;17050,00
151055403627;15;00;43;;BRUEHNING, ERHARD:;;;24092,50
310553406420;08;20;00;;BRUEMMER, HANS-JOACHIM:;;;22080,00
270960413624;96;15;10;;BRUENECKE, FRANK:;;;19305,00
171254512226;07;78;00;;BRUENING, BIRGIT:;;;17464,92
210532430044;13;99;01;;BRUENING, CLAUS:;;;42750,00
060468400615;01;00;49;;BRUENING, DIRK:;;;13785,00
250447411910;07;19;00;;BRUENING, GERHARD:;;;27000,00
141048507410;98;20;00;;BRUENING, HEIDEMARIE:;;;19993,63
230568406116;04;69;00;;BRUENING, HEIKO:;;;9875,00
180448401828;02;19;00;;BRUENING, HEINZ:;;;25875,00
081253407417;99;43;00;;BRUENING, JUERGEN:;;;25860,00
090941402219;02;08;00;;BRUENING, KLAUS:;;;19718,75
090463427736;30;59;00;;BRUENING, RALPH:;;;15180,00
231046411414;94;30;00;;BRUENING, REINHARD:;;;26562,50
251270400638;98;18;00;;BRUENING, ULF:;;;2700,00
050266400896;01;18;00;;BRUENKMANN, UWE:;;;15974,00
070851427019;14;22;00;;BRUENLER, HARRY:;;;23040,00
121169418328;94;30;00;;BRUENNER, DIRK:;;;2700,00
061146418315;10;00;45;;BRUENNER, HANS-DIETER:;;;24480,00
081244500724;30;81;00;;BRUENNER, RENATE:;;;16200,00
140139505918;97;06;00;;BRUESEHABER, GERDA:;;;22320,00
160942405914;99;40;00;;BRUESEHABER, GUENTER:;;;27750,00
250966400893;18;41;30;;BRUESEHABER, JAN:;;;14168,00
081050403416;03;20;00;;BRUESER, BODO:;;;22892,50
070641428929;97;06;00;;BRUESEWITZ, PETER:;;;24000,00
210961406747;98;85;00;;BRUESKE, HANS-JUERGEN:;;;18480,00
211051429741;30;62;00;;BRUESSAU, MICHAEL:;;;15903,75
261142506111;17;00;00;;BRUESSEL, HEIDI:;;;21000,00
280858428124;14;00;60;;BRUESSEL, ULLRICH:;;;12161,25
300154400022;01;55;00;;BRUESSOW, BERNHARD:;;;16867,50
020366515351;97;01;00;;BRUESSOW, GRIT:;;;13217,31
100950409910;95;45;00;;BRUESSOW, KLAUS:;;;26460,00
041262400712;97;01;00;;BRUESSOW, MARIO:;;;16038,00
240652400517;01;19;00;;BRUEST, HANS-JOACHIM:;;;21620,00
150469403729;18;32;00;;BRUGGER, THOMAS:;;;9313,50
031048402419;18;80;00;;BRUHN, DIETER:;;;20812,50
040747417120;09;26;00;;BRUHN, HEINZ-JUERGEN:;;;26437,50
270247401812;02;00;42;;BRUHN, ROLF:;;;30750,00
281150401318;96;15;00;650/75/39, :;BRUHN, SIEGFRIED;2520;ALEKSIS-KIVI-STR. 29;
281150401318;96;15;00;650/75/39, :;BRUHN, SIEGFRIED;2520;ALEKSIS-KIVI-STR. 29;
061068414713;94;03;00;;BRUHN, TORSTEN:;;;13175,00
200250400817;01;00;40;;BRUHN, WOLFGANG:;;;25500,00
060353406128;04;06;00;;BRUHNS, ULF-PETER:;;;20711,62
240664403627;03;14;00;;BRUKSCH, ANDREAS:;;;15840,00
130768413726;18;35;00;;BRUMBY, MAIK:;;;9675,00
290942530032;99;77;00;;BRUMM, DORIS:;;;27000,00
060440422740;12;00;40;;BRUMM, GERHARD:;;;26250,00
250369430074;17;00;00;;BRUMM, HOLGER:;;;8950,00
011158405110;15;80;00;;BRUMM, JUERGEN:;;;18227,50
210560400870;01;06;25;;BRUMM, NORBERT:;;;17680,00
180155418618;94;03;00;;BRUMME, KLAUS-PETER:;;;22647,50
300562416226;09;06;00;;BRUMMER, HEIKO:;;;17380,00
010268403218;03;69;00;;BRUMMUND, DIRK:;;;10575,00
020135402739;02;53;00;;BRUMMUND, EGON:;;;27375,00
250863402749;99;02;00;;BRUMMUND, JU(E)RGEN:;;;19415,00
290862402727;94;30;00;;BRUMMUND, MICHAEL:;;;17847,50
081268430038;99;43;00;;BRUNA, ANDREAS:;;;13575,00
140147530064;99;43;00;;BRUNA, GUDRUN:;;;20706,00
230844429729;99;43;00;;BRUNA, WOLFGANG:;;;27750,00
160359522224;98;83;00;;BRUNK, BIRGIT:;;;17585,39
010253429749;15;20;00;;BRUNK, ECKART:;;;23715,00
280955401310;97;17;00;;BRUNK, HEINZ:;;;20010,00
020969404415;94;03;00;;BRUNK, KARSTEN:;;;9510,00
180349401320;98;82;00;;BRUNK, KLAUS-DIETER:;;;24337,50
190559403841;03;80;00;;BRUNK, KLAUS-DIETER:;;;16675,00
190847403715;97;08;00;;BRUNK, MANFRED:;;;27000,00
140253403720;03;14;00;;BRUNK, REINHARD:;;;18480,00
210360524940;30;63;00;;BRUNKAL, ELKE:;;;10916,33
280355425052;30;63;00;;BRUNKAL, KARL-HEINZ:;;;15510,00
210370429752;94;03;00;;BRUNKOW, BIRK:;;;2700,00
190342429733;99;26;00;;BRUNKOW, HANS-PETER:;;;39750,00
010240529716;98;20;00;;BRUNKOW, INGRID:;;;23125,00
050150406428;04;00;42;;BRUNKOW, KLAUS:;;;25860,00
020560508913;30;84;00;;BRUNN, DANIELA:;;;12738,97
280550413428;30;63;00;;BRUNN, HELMUT:;;;17280,00
031239430092;15;06;00;;BRUNN, LOTHAR:;;;26250,00
300155515315;99;40;00;;BRUNNE, PETRA:;;;20842,50
280954423825;99;40;00;;BRUNNE, RALF:;;;23400,00
210163400893;97;01;00;;BRUNNENMEIER, STEFFEN:;;;16335,00
270259422717;12;08;00;;BRUNNER, ANDREAS:;;;19952,50
231244530078;99;12;00;;BRUNNER, ANKE:;;;21600,00
220260406129;04;06;00;;BRUNNER, AXEL:;;;19665,00
071055529836;96;15;04;;BRUNNER, CARMEN:;;;19492,50
010553501829;02;03;00;;BRUNNER, CHRISTA:;;;11757,08
010247411518;07;00;54;;BRUNNER, DIETER:;;;27937,50
021047410418;02;00;42;;BRUNNER, DIETER:;;;22500,00
020366430024;98;27;00;;BRUNNER, DIRK:;;;15876,00
260238418410;97;06;00;;BRUNNER, GOTTFRIED:;;;21266,66
070847422725;12;00;47;;BRUNNER, HANS-JUERGEN:;;;25117,50
010951429818;97;08;00;;BRUNNER, HEINZ:;;;18942,50
070369428224;18;38;00;;BRUNNER, INGO:;;;9675,00
120765430214;96;15;25;;BRUNNER, JAN:;;;19150,50
210169427229;18;33;00;;BRUNNER, JENS:;;;10500,00
061152428210;14;15;00;;BRUNNER, JUERGEN:;;;24832,50
030239429724;99;09;00;;BRUNNER, KLAUS:;;;29250,00
260429430017;96;15;00;1920/75, J:;BRUNNER, MANFRED;1144;TETEROWER RING 86;
260429430017;96;15;00;1920/75, J:;BRUNNER, MANFRED;1144;TETEROWER RING 86;
050170429352;94;03;00;;BRUNNER, MARKO:;;;10335,00
040438430233;60;90;00;;BRUNNER, THEO:;;;
040438430233;60;90;00;;BRUNNER, THEO:;;;30600,00
010766420125;11;69;00;;BRUNNER, TORSTEN:;;;15876,00
190942405233;03;18;00;;BRUNNER, WERNER:;;;27000,00
280736414218;08;00;54;;BRUNNERT, HILMAR:;;;23343,01
260639410815;07;06;00;;BRUNNERT, JUERGEN:;;;24187,50
070670409823;18;33;00;;BRUNNGRA(E)BER, MAREK:;;;6958,87
240369410023;18;31;00;;BRUNOW, RALF:;;;9675,00
050662522799;96;15;00;6555/82, J:;BRUNS, BEATE;1140;BA(E)RENSTEINSTR. 8;
050662522799;96;15;00;6555/82, J:;BRUNS, BEATE;1140;BA(E)RENSTEINSTR. 8;
100571409523;05;69;00;;BRUNS, HENRY:;;;2870,00
160858405938;97;08;00;;BRUNS, MICHAEL:;;;18601,25
110570421116;12;69;00;;BRUNS, STEFFEN:;;;9830,00
210951508811;30;83;00;;BRUNS, SYBILLE:;;;20359,55
020348410820;99;55;00;;BRUNS, WALTER:;;;24000,00
031268403632;18;35;00;;BRUNS, WOLFGANG:;;;9675,00
301057413934;97;01;00;;BRUNSCH, JUERGEN:;;;29760,00
240543411110;07;00;51;;BRUNSCH, KLAUS-DIETER:;;;24750,00
150166413911;15;07;00;;BRUNSCH, OLAF:;;;18414,00
020853409812;07;18;00;;BRUNSENDORF, DIETER:;;;24480,00
191154511435;07;41;00;;BRUNSENDORF, GUDRUN:;;;19440,00
300852409825;07;00;41;;BRUNSENDORF, LOTHAR:;;;23460,00
290153402716;02;06;00;;BRUNST, HOLGER:;;;20160,00
060270403714;18;34;00;;BRUNST, STEFAN:;;;6705,00
230358430062;15;80;00;;BRUNTSCH, DETLEF:;;;17935,02
260862407010;18;38;00;;BRUSAK, DIRK:;;;20161,43
070268501568;97;06;00;;BRUSCH, ANNETT:;;;9783,34
151063400119;01;00;45;;BRUSCH, HOLGER:;;;15592,50
050657400113;99;12;00;;BRUSCH, MANFRED:;;;20815,00
051165401528;01;60;00;;BRUSE, DIRK:;;;14835,00
211040501517;01;06;22;;BRUSE, GERDA:;;;16296,30
150646400810;01;65;00;;BRUSE, GERHARD:;;;20625,00
070638403413;03;65;00;;BRUSE, HANS-ULRICH:;;;25687,50
140948401510;97;06;00;;BRUSE, PAUL:;;;24000,00
020741430086;30;84;00;;BRUSENDORF, WOLFGANG:;;;16560,00
100357421716;12;06;00;;BRUSSIG, ROLAND:;;;19492,50
070736421711;12;00;51;;BRUSSIG, SIEGFRIED:;;;16847,50
220260523624;14;00;56;;BRUSSOG, BIRGIT:;;;14948,75
081148529711;94;30;00;;BRUST, MARION:;;;21157,25
021046429715;99;43;00;;BRUST, UDO:;;;26187,50
210137429713;99;02;00;;BRUTKE, RUDOLF:;;;36008,06
011153429746;30;47;00;;BRUTSCHIN, SIEGBERT:;;;23090,00
120140411216;07;08;00;;BRUTTLOFF, HANS-JOACHIM:;;;21750,00
120249430066;30;47;00;;BRYCHCY, MICHAEL:;;;29280,00
091052407014;05;08;00;;BRYKCZYNSKI, JOERG:;;;18749,03
060571512244;07;96;00;;BRYLLA, KERSTIN:;;;3220,00
140250412226;07;06;00;;BRYLLA, KLAUS-DIETER:;;;21720,00
140853412217;07;06;00;;BRYLLA, WOLFGANG:;;;20160,00
180842421827;94;03;00;;BRYLSKI, JUERGEN:;;;24000,00
231269407228;05;69;00;;BRYM, RAINER:;;;2870,00
020858406418;30;58;00;;BRZAKALA, JUERGEN:;;;16445,00
170160413628;06;00;50;;BRZANK, RAINER:;;;19800,00
161250413213;08;00;44;;BRZEZINSKI, JU(E)RGEN:;;;19800,00
130655417528;09;00;51;;BRZEZINSKI, LUTZ:;;;27967,50
200239402731;30;44;00;;BRZEZOWSKA, ALFRED:;;;15120,00
251243412211;07;51;00;;BRZOSKA, INGBERT:;;;21750,00
280542512215;07;40;00;;BRZOSKA, MARGA:;;;26437,50
091056518520;10;51;00;;BRZUSKA, DAGMAR:;;;18917,50
090956407215;05;80;00;;BRZYSKI, BODO:;;;16905,00
040743530388;18;77;00;;BSDUREK, RENATE:;;;23040,00
NEWARK—The mayor of West New York, New Jersey and his son were arrested today for allegedly hacking into an e-mail account and website associated with a movement to recall the mayor, U.S. Attorney Paul J. Fishman announced.
Felix Roque, 55, of Hudson County, and Joseph Roque, 22, of Passaic County, are charged by complaint with gaining unauthorized access to computers in furtherance of causing damage to protected computers; causing damage to protected computers; and conspiracy to commit those crimes. Felix and Joseph Roque are scheduled to appear this afternoon before U.S. Magistrate Judge Mark S. Falk in Newark federal court.
“In this case, the elected leader of West New York and his son allegedly hacked into computers to intimidate constituents who were simply using the Internet to exercise their Constitutional rights to criticize the government,” U.S. Attorney Fishman said. “We will continue to investigate and prosecute those who illegally hack into computers and disable websites with the goal of suppressing the exercise of that right.”
“This case illustrates two primary concerns of law enforcement, the violation of public trust and cyber intrusion,” FBI Special Agent in Charge Michael B. Ward said. “In this instance, an elected official conspired to hack into a website and e-mail account. It’s incredibly disappointing that resources have to be diverted from protecting the U.S. against cyber intrusions targeting critical infrastructure, federally funded research, and military technology to address a public official intruding into computer systems to further a political agenda.”
According to the criminal complaint unsealed today:
In early February 2012, a Hudson County resident and public official anonymously established and moderated an Internet website, http://www.recallroque.com, to post commentary and criticism of Mayor Felix Roque and his administration. On February 6 2012, Mayor Roque and his son, Joseph Roque, schemed to hack into and take down the website and to identify, intimidate, and harass those who operated and were associated with the website.
By the late afternoon of February 8, 2012, Joseph Roque had successfully hacked into various online accounts used in connection with the recall website. Joseph Roque then used that access to disable the website. Mayor Roque harassed and attempted to intimidate several individuals whom he had learned were associated with the recall website.
The conspiracy charge and the charge of gaining unauthorized access to a computer in furtherance of causing damage to protected computers are each punishable by a maximum potential penalty of five years in prison and a fine of up to $250,000. The charge of causing damage to protected computers carries a maximum potential penalty of one year in prison and a fine of up to $250,000.
U.S. Attorney Fishman credited special agents of the FBI under the direction of Special Agent in Charge Michael B. Ward in Newark with the investigation leading to the arrests.
The government is represented by Assistant U.S. Attorneys Seth Kosto of the U.S. Attorney’s Office Computer Hacking and Intellectual Property Section of the Office’s Economic Crimes Unit and Barbara Llanes of the Special Prosecutions Division in Newark.
The charges and allegations contained in the complaint are merely accusations, and the defendants are considered innocent unless and until proven guilty.

Sovereign citizens believe the government is operating outside of its jurisdiction and generally do not recognize federal, state, or local laws, policies, or governmental regulations. They subscribe to a number of conspiracy theories, including a prevalent theory which states the United States Government (USG) became bankrupt and began using citizens as collateral in trade agreements with foreign governments. They believe secret bank accounts exist at the United States (US) Department of the Treasury. These accounts can be accessed using Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Universal Commercial Code (UCC), and fraudulent financial documents.
Sovereign citizens are known to travel the country conducting training seminars on debt elimination schemes. The seminars focus on obtaining funds from a secret “Strawman” account using legitimate IRS forms, UCC forms, and fraudulent financial documents. Sovereign citizens believe once the documentation is filed, they gain access to their “Strawman” account with the Treasury Department.
The purpose of this primer is to assist law enforcement in the identification of sovereign citizen extremist activity to prevent, detect, and/or deter acts associated with sovereign citizen criminal activity.
…
POSSIBLE INDICATORS OF SOVEREIGN CITIZEN ACTIVITY
Some or all of the following may provide an indication of sovereign activity. However it is important to note these activities may also be indicative of lawful, innocent conduct and in some instances may constitute the exercise of rights guaranteed by the United States Constitution. For these reasons, these indicators should be considered in the context of other suspicious behavior and the totality of the circumstances in which they are observed or reported.
- Documentation may be mailed and addressed to the Secretary of the Treasury Department or the Depository Trust Company
- Documentation includes an “Apostille Number”
- Documents contain the phrase “Accepted for Value”
- Documents are notarized, even if not required
- International postage rates is applied even for domestic mailings
- All paperwork will be mailed using registered mail
- Stamps will be affixed near the signature line or at the bottom corner of the page
- Name written in all capital letters
- Example: JOHN SMITH
- Name will be written last name : first name
- Example: Smith: John or Smith: Family of John
- Zip codes enclosed in brackets
- Example: [11233]
- Presence of thumbprints on documents,
- Typically in red or blue ink
- Typically on or near a signature or seal
- “SLS” may follow signature
- “SLS” stands for “Sovereign Living Soul”
…
Generally, sovereign citizens do not operate as a group or have an established leadership hierarchy. Rather, they act independently or in loosely affiliated groups which come together for training, to assist with paperwork, and to socialize based on sovereign ideology. Sovereign citizens often refer to themselves as “Freemen.” [Note: The use of the word “Freemen” does not inherently indicate a connection to any specific group, however, some use the term “Freemen” in their group name. Others may indicate they are a “free man,” meaning free from government control.]
Sovereign citizens believe the USG is illegitimate and has drifted away from the true intent of the Constitution. As a result, the USG is not perceived to be acting in the interest of the American people. These groups generally do not adhere to federal, state, or local laws. Some sovereign citizens believe federal and state officials have no real authority and will only recognize the local sheriff’s department as the only legitimate government official. Other law enforcement officials are viewed as being oppressive and illegitimate.
Individuals who adhere to this ideology believe their status as a sovereign citizen exempts them from US laws and the US tax system. They believe the US Federal Reverse System, the Treasury Department, and banking systems are illegitimate. Therefore, one of the perceived “benefits” of being a sovereign citizen is not paying federal or state taxes.
Sovereign citizens view the USG as bankrupt and without tangible assets; therefore, the USG is believed to use citizens to back US currency. Sovereign citizens believe the USG operates solely on a credit system using American citizens as collateral. Sovereign citizens exploit this belief by filing fraudulent financial documents charging their debt to the Treasury Department. In addition, they routinely engage in mortgage, credit card, tax, and loan fraud.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AcUJJNNxj3M
For the entire period of the Cold War, a large proportion of the Soviet Union’s economy and massive scientific establishment was dedicated to the development and refinement of new and better weapons. During the 50s and 60s, the Soviet government’s paranoia about Western technical superiority was at its height.
ADM MCRAVEN: Thank you, Steve. Well, good evening, everyone, and welcome to tonight’s gala dinner. Before I begin, please join me in a round of applause for the staff of the Tampa Convention Center and the action officers from USSOCOM who worked so very hard to make this event a great success. (Applause.)
To our international guests, our local, state, and national leaders, our guests from industry, and the National Defense Industrial Association, thank you for making this event a priority in your busy schedule, and for your continued support to Special Operations.
Now I have the great privilege of introducing our guest speaker, a woman who has spent virtually her entire life in the service of our country and in the service of the greater international community. She was the first lady of the state of Arkansas, the first lady of the United States, a U.S. senator from the great state of New York, and since 2009, she has held the position as the U.S. Secretary of State.
In a Time Magazine article last month, she was named one of the top 100 most influential people in the world. In that Time article, the former Secretary of Defense, Bob Gates, said of her, and I quote, “In a world that is ever more complex, turbulent, and dangerous, Secretary Clinton has made a singular contribution to strengthening this country’s relationships with allies, partners, and friends, rallying other countries to join us in dealing with challenges to the global order from Libya to Iran to the South China Sea, and reaching out to the people in scores continue – in scores of countries to demonstrate that America cares about them.”
No Secretary in recent memory has had to deal with more international challenges than the war in Iraq and Afghanistan, to the Arab Spring, to the always difficult and challenging North Korea and Iran. In spite of these challenges, she has made incredible strides in safeguarding democratic reforms in Burma, advancing women’s rights around the globe, and reshaping the State Department to align the incredible power of our diplomats, the civilian power, with our already strong military power.
Secretary Clinton is beloved by the men and women in the U.S. military. She is our type of lady – a woman of uncompromising integrity who won’t back down from a good fight, particularly when it comes to matters of principle, a leader who is passionate about the welfare of the world’s less privileged, the disenfranchised, and the downtrodden, and a Secretary who deeply cares for her people and who is an incredibly strong supporter of our men and women in uniform.
Over the last few years, I have had several opportunities to work with Secretary Clinton on some of the United States’s most sensitive military missions. In each case, she listened intently to my advice. In each case, she was instrumental in the final decisions. And in each and every case, she never, ever wavered from her commitment to the American people. She is, without a doubt, one of the finest public servants ever to serve this great nation.
Ladies and gentlemen, please join me in welcoming the United States Secretary of State, The Honorable Hillary Rodham Clinton. (Applause.)
SECRETARY CLINTON: Good evening. Good evening. It is a great honor for me to be here with you this evening. I want to thank Admiral McRaven for that introduction, but far more than that, for his remarkable service to our country, from leading an underwater demolition SEAL platoon to heading the Joint Special Operations Command. He’s doing a terrific job as the ninth commander of the United States Special Operations Command. (Applause.) Many of you know, as Admiral McRaven knows, that it takes real guts to run a mission deep into hostile territory, full of potential dangers. And of course, I’m talking about the White House Correspondents’ Dinner. (Laughter.)
I am pleased to be here with so many representatives to this conference from 90 countries around the world. Your participation is a testament to the important partnerships, and I am grateful that you are here. Because we face common challenges, we face common threats, and they cannot be contained by borders and boundaries.
You know that extremist networks squeezed in one country migrate to others. Terrorist propaganda from a cell in Yemen can incite attacks as far away as Detroit or Delhi. A flu in Macao can become an epidemic in Miami. Technology and globalization have made our countries and our communities interdependent and interconnected. And today’s threats have become so complex, fast-moving, and cross-cutting that no one nation could ever hope to solve them alone.
From the first days of this Administration, we have worked to craft a new approach to our national security that reflects this changing landscape, starting with better integrating the three Ds of our foreign policy and national security: diplomacy, development, and defense. And we call it smart power.
And I have been privileged to work with two secretaries of Defense, Bob Gates and Leon Panetta, and two chairmen of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Mike Mullen and Marty Dempsey, who understood and valued the role of diplomacy and development, who saw that we need to work to try to prevent conflict, help rebuild shattered societies, and lighten the load on our military.
For my part, first as a senator serving on the Armed Services Committee and now as Secretary of State, I have seen and admired the extraordinary service and sacrifice of our men and women in uniform. So we have made it a priority to have our soldiers, diplomats, and development experts work hand-in-hand across the globe. And we are getting better at coordinating budgets and bureaucracies in Washington as well.
To my mind, Special Operations Forces exemplify the ethic of smart power – fast and flexible, constantly adapting, learning new languages and cultures, dedicated to forming partnerships where we can work together. And we believe that we should work together wherever we can, and go it alone when we must. This model is delivering results.
Admiral McRaven talks about two mutually reinforcing strategies for Special Operations: the direct and the indirect. Well, we all know about the direct approach. Just ask the al-Qaida leaders who have been removed from the battlefield.
But not enough attention is paid to the quiet, persistent work Special Operations Forces are doing every single day along with many of you to build our joint capacity. You are forging relationships in key communities, and not just with other militaries, but also with civil society. You are responding to natural disasters and alleviating humanitarian suffering.
Now, some might ask what does all this have to do with your core mission of war fighting? Well, we’ve learned – and it’s been a hard lesson in the last decade – we’ve learned that to defeat a terror network, we need to attack its finances, recruitment, and safe havens. We also need to take on its ideology and diminish its appeal, particularly to young people. And we need effective international partners in both government and civil society who can extend this effort to all the places where terrorists hide and plot their attacks.
This is part of the smart power approach to our long fight against terrorism. And so we need Special Operations Forces who are as comfortable drinking tea with tribal leaders as raiding a terrorist compound. We also need diplomats and development experts who understand modern warfare and are up to the job of being your partners.
One of our senior Foreign Service officers, Karen Williams, is serving here in Tampa on Admiral McRaven’s staff. And under an agreement finalized this year, we are nearly doubling the number of military and Foreign Service officers who will be exchanged between the Departments of State and Defense. (Applause.) We know we need to better understand each other, and we know that through that better understanding there is even more we can do together.
When I served on the Senate Armed Services Committee, I was impressed by the Pentagon’s Quadrennial Defense Reviews, called the QDR, which guided plans and priorities every four years. So when I became Secretary of State, I launched the first-ever Quadrennial Diplomacy and Development Review, and we call it the QDDR. Through it, we are overhauling the State Department and USAID to become more operational, more strategic in our use of resources and personnel, more expeditionary, and more focused on transnational threats.
Let me highlight a few examples. As part of the QDDR, we created a new Bureau of Conflict and Stabilization Operations that is working to put into practice lessons learned over the past decade and institutionalize a civilian surge capacity to deal with crises and hotspots.
Experts from this new bureau are working closely with Special Operations Forces around the world. I’ll give you, though, just this one example from Central Africa, where we are working together to help our African partners pursue Joseph Kony and the Lord’s Resistance Army. In fact, they were on the ground a few months before our troops arrived, building relationships in local communities. And because of their work, village chiefs and other leaders are actively encouraging defections from the Lord’s Resistance Army. Just a few weeks ago, our civilians and troops together helped one community set up its own radio station that is now broadcasting “come home” messages to the fighters. Our diplomats also saw that the UN staff in the region could be useful partners. So they worked through our team in Washington and New York to obtain new authorities for the UN officials on the ground and then link them up directly with our Special Operations Forces to share expertise and improve coordination. Now, this mission isn’t finished yet, but you can begin to see the potential when soldiers and diplomats live in the same camps and eat the same MREs. That is smart power in action.
Here’s another example. We know we need to do a better job contesting the online space, media websites and forums where al-Qaida and its affiliates spread their propaganda and recruit followers. So at the State Department, we’ve launched a new interagency Center for Strategic Counterterrorism Communications. It’s housed at the State Department, but it draws on experts from the intelligence community and the Defense Department, including Special Operations Forces.
The nerve center in Washington is linking up to military and civilian teams around the world and serving as a force multiplier for our embassies’ communications efforts. Together, we are working to pre-empt, discredit, and outmaneuver extremist propagandists. A digital outreach team of tech savvy specialists – fluent in Urdu, Arabic, Somali – is already patrolling the web and using social media and other tools to expose the inherent contradictions in al-Qaida’s propaganda and also bring to light the abuses committed by al-Qaida, particularly the continuing brutal attacks on Muslim civilians.
For example, a couple of weeks ago, al-Qaida’s affiliate in Yemen began an advertising campaign on key tribal web sites bragging about killing Americans and trying to recruit new supporters. Within 48 hours, our team plastered the same sites with altered versions of the ads that showed the toll al-Qaida attacks have taken on the Yemeni people. And we can tell that our efforts are starting to have an impact, because we monitor the extremists venting their frustration and asking their supporters not to believe everything they read on the Internet. (Applause.)
Now, this kind of ideological battle is slow and incremental, but I think it’s critical to our efforts, because what sustains al-Qaida and its terrorist affiliates is the steady flow of new recruits. They replace the terrorists you kill or capture so that they can plan new attacks. This is not about winning a popularity contest, but it is a simple fact that achieving our objectives is easier with more friends and fewer enemies. And I believe passionately that the truth is our friend. Exposing the lies and evil that rests at the heart of the terrorist narrative is absolutely to our advantage.
Now, we’ve also changed the way we do business on the civilian side to be better partners to you in the military. As part of our reorganization, we’ve created a full Counterterrorism Bureau at the State Department that is spearheading a diplomatic campaign around the world to increase local capacity of governments and to deny terrorists the space and financing they need to plan and carry out attacks.
This fits right in with the purpose of this conference: deepening international cooperation against terrorism and other shared challenges. As the threat from al-Qaida becomes more diffuse and distributed, shifting from the core to the affiliates, it is even more important to forge close ties with the governments and communities on the front lines and to help build up their counterterrorism capacity. After all, they often are better positioned than we are to provide services to their people, disrupt plots, and prosecute extremists, and they certainly often bear the brunt of terrorist attacks. So we need to build an international counterterrorism network that is as nimble and adaptive as our adversaries’. Admiral McRaven helped establish the NATO Special Operations Forces Coordination Centre, so I know he understands how important this is.
Each year, the State Department trains nearly 7,000 police, prosecutors, and counterterrorism officials from more than 60 countries, including frontline states like Yemen and Pakistan. We’re expanding our work with civil society organizations in specific terrorist hotspots – particular villages, prisons, and schools – to try to disrupt the process of radicalization by creating jobs, promoting religious tolerance, amplifying the voices of the victims of terrorism.
This whole effort goes hand-in-glove with the work of Special Operations Forces to train elite troops in places like the Philippines, Colombia, and Afghanistan under the Army Special Forces motto: By, with, and through. You’re doing this in one form or another in more than 100 countries around the world. And this work gives you a chance to develop a deeper understanding of local culture and customs, to learn the human domain as well as the physical terrain.
I’m impressed by the work of your Cultural Support Teams, highly-trained female Special Operations Forces who engage with local populations in sensitive areas like Afghanistan. This is part of our National Action Plan on Women, Peace, and Security that was developed jointly by the Departments of State, Defense, and others to capitalize on the contributions women everywhere can make to resolving conflicts and improving security. Around the world today, women are refusing to sit on the sidelines while extremism undermines their communities, steals their sons, kills their husbands, and destroys family after family. (Applause.) They’re joining police forces in Afghanistan. They’re writing newspaper articles in Yemen. They’re forming organizations such as Sisters Against Violent Extremism that has now spread to 17 countries. And we are committed to working with these women and doing everything we can to support their efforts as well.
We have to keep our international cooperation going and growing at every level. Next week I’ll be heading to Europe, and I’ll end up in Istanbul for the second meeting of the new Global Counterterrorism Forum, which we helped launch last year. Turkey and the United States serve as the founding co-chairs, and we’ve been joined by nearly 30 other nations. Together, we’re working to identify threats and weaknesses like porous borders, unchecked propaganda, and then devise solutions and mobilize resources. For example, the UAE has agreed to host a new center to develop best practices for countering extremism and radicalization.
Now, some of you in this room have come great distances to be here because you understand that we need a global effort to defeat a global terrorist network. And I thank you for that recognition and for your commitment.
I want to say just a final word about American Special Forces and to thank the admiral and every member of the United States Special Operations Forces who are here today – Army Rangers and Special Forces soldiers, Navy SEALs and Marine special operators, Air Force commandos, every one of you. So much of what you do, both the tremendous successes and the terrible sacrifices, will never be known by the citizens we serve. But I know what you do, and so do others who marvel and appreciate what it means for you to serve.
We’ve just passed the one-year anniversary of the raid that killed Usama bin Ladin. (Applause.) And I well remember those many hours in the Situation Room, the small group that was part of the planning and decision-making process with Admiral McRaven sitting there at the table with us. And I certainly remember that day. We were following every twist and turn of that mission. It was a day of stress and emotion, concern and commitment. I couldn’t help but think of all the people that I represented as a senator from New York serving on 9/11 and how much they and all of us deserved justice for our friends and our loved ones. I was thinking about America and how important it was to protect our country from another attack. But mostly, I was thinking of the men in the helicopters, praying for their safety as they risked their lives on that moonless Pakistani night.
And one thing that I am always proud of and that I hope is conveyed to our visitors and partners around the world: When you meet our special operators or when you meet members of our military or our diplomats and development experts, you will see every shade of skin color, every texture of hair, every color of eye. And if you spend a little time talking and getting to know that man or woman, you will find different parentage, different ethnicity, different religions, because we are Americans. And as Americans, we have a special opportunity and obligation in this interdependent, interconnected world to stand up for the universal rights and dignity of every person; to protect every man, woman, and child from the kind of senseless violence that terrorism inflicts; and also, frankly, to model.
In many places where we go, I as a Secretary of State or our special forces as members of our military, we see ancient disputes between tribes, ethnicities, religions, sex of the same religion, men and women. Just about every possible category is used all too often to separate people instead of finding common ground. If we have learned nothing in the last decade, we should certainly have learned that the terrorists are equal opportunity killers. They want to inflict terror on everyone who does not see the world from their particular narrow, outdated, dead-end worldview.
When you are pursuing a mission in partnership or on behalf of your own country, let us remember that we are on the right side of history. We are on the side of right. Your service is making the world safer for people to be who they are, to live their lives in peace and harmony. That is going to be the challenge of the 21st century. Will we once and for all recognize our common humanity and stand together against the forces of darkness or not? I’m betting we will. And I think it’s a pretty good bet, knowing that our Special Operations Forces and their partners are at the point of that spear.
Thank you for all that you do, not only to keep us safe and protect our ways of life but to demonstrate unequivocally that the world will not tolerate being undermined by those who refuse to recognize that we are truly one world of humanity that deserves the opportunity to pursue our rights and opportunities for a better life. I am very proud to be here to thank you. Thank you for keeping our nation safe and strong. Thank you for working to keep other nations safe and strong. Thank you for helping us build the world that our children deserve.
Thank you all very much. (Applause.)
MODERATOR: Ladies and gentlemen, the commander will now present our guest of honor with a token of our appreciation.
ADM MCRAVEN: Madam Secretary, a small token of our appreciation for joining us here tonight. This is, as you quickly noted, our version of Excalibur, the sword and the stone. And of course, as legend has it, only the wisest and the bravest can pull the sword from the stone. My guess is it will come out easily in your hand. So thank you very much, ma’am, for joining us here tonight. Thank you very much.
SECRETARY CLINTON: Thank you so much, Admiral. (Applause.)
DOWNLOAD THE ORGINAL DOCUMENT HERE
Lord Ashdown, a former special forces commando, tells the story of the ‘Cockleshell Heroes’, who led one of the most daring and audacious commando raids of World War II.
In 1942, Britain was struggling to fight back against Nazi Germany. Lacking the resources for a second front, Churchill encouraged innovative and daring new methods of combat. Enter stage left, Blondie Hasler.
With a unit of twelve Royal Marine commandos, Major Blondie Hasler believed his ‘cockleshell’ canoe could be effectively used in clandestine attacks on the enemy. Their brief was to navigate the most heavily defended estuary in Europe, to dodge searchlights, machine-gun posts and armed river-patrol craft 70 miles downriver, and then to blow up enemy shipping in Bordeaux harbour.
Lord Ashdown recreates parts of the raid and explains how this experience was used in preparing for one of the greatest land invasions in history, D-day.
Rise And Fall Of The Third Reich
Escape from Sobibor tells the story of the Jews who could escape from the most secret camp of the German during WW II: Sobibor
DOWNLOAD THE ORGINAL DOCUMENT HERE

The following study was commissioned by World Business Chicago, the parent organization of the group hosting the upcoming NATO Summit. The study estimates an injection of $128 million into the local economy of Chicago as a result of the summit. Economists have questioned the accuracy of these numbers, which do not take into account a number of factors including potential damage to the city as well as widespread business closures in and around downtown Chicago.
On May 20-21, 2012, Chicago will host the 25th North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) Summit – the first NATO Summit in the U.S. held outside of Washington, DC. Delegations from 28 NATO Member Countries, 24 International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) Partner Countries, and six other nations and international organizations will participate in the Summit. The Summit will bring economic benefits in the form of spending, tax revenues, employment, hotel guests, tourism, and broader global attention. Over 7,500 delegates and 7,300 staff, press, and other dignitaries are expected to attend the Summit. In addition, planning for the Summit prompted visits and spending by delegations during advance trips to Chicago. Building on the momentum of the Summit, many Chicago organizations have planned events that will generate additional economic impacts for the City. These ancillary events are expected to draw thousands of additional speakers, staff, attendees, and members of the media.
The scope of this analysis is limited to the City of Chicago proper, and all impacts described refer to the City and not to the larger Cook County, Chicago Metropolitan Statistical Area, or the State of Illinois.
Summary:
- The Summit and its planning phases will inject an estimated $123.0 million into the City of Chicago economy; the City will receive over 18,300 Summit attendees and staff, contributing more than 44,000 room nights.
- Ancillary events will add an estimated $5.2 million, 2,900 additional out-of-town visitors, and more than 5,300 room nights to the City of Chicago economy.
- The City will accrue an additional $3.0 million in fiscal impacts through tax receipts. This does not include any State or County taxes.
- In total, the Summit will result in an estimated $128.2 million in total impacts to the City of Chicago, $3.0 million in local tax revenues, over 21,200 visitors, 49,300 hotel nights, and close to 2,200 temporary jobs in the City of Chicago. These impacts are summarized in Figure 1 above.
In addition to the quantitative impacts described in this report, Chicago is likely to experience other, less tangible effects from the Summit. These include immediate and long term international attention, reinforcement of Chicago’s brand as a world class city, and elevation of Chicago’s role as host for future global events. At an international event of this scale, protests or other unscheduled disruptions may also occur, which could result in mixed media attention; however, the value of exposure is difficult to estimate reliably and was not within the scope of this analysis.
DOWNLOAD THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT HERE
|
|
US Air Force (USAF) maintenance personnel assigned to the 12th Expeditionary Reconnaissance Squadron (ERS), check the maintenance log for a RQ-4A Global Hawk high-altitude, long-endurance unmanned aerial reconnaissance system while preparing for a mission at a forward location, while deployed in support of Operation ENDURING FREEDOM. Pictured left-to-right, USAF (Major) Greg Hataway, Staff Sergeant (SSGT) Kelvin Rasor, and MAJ John D’ortona. Photographer’s Name: SSGT Reynaldo Ramon, USAF. Date Shot: 6/30/2002 |
Chuck Gardner, systems engineer(front), and Patrick Didier, senior crew technician, both from Northrop Grumman Ryan Aeronautical Center, check the systems on a Global Hawk unmanned aerial vehicle after its arrival at Langley Air Force Base, Va., June 21, 2001. The aircraft flew non-stop from Edwards Air Force, California in support of the Supreme Allied Commander, Atlantic (SACLANT) Seminar taking place at Langley. (Photo by TSgt Jack Braden) (Released). Date Shot: 6/21/2001 |
Sitting at the controls, Maj. George Barth, a pilot from the 31st Test and Evaluation Squadron, Edwards Air Force Base, Calif., flies the Global Hawk May 14, 2001, from inside the Mission Control Element, at Edinburgh Air Force Base, Australia, in support of Exercise Tandem Thrust. The Global Hawk is a jet powered Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) designed as a Reconnaissance and Surveillance vehicle with a wing span equal to a Boeing 737, flying at altitudes of up to 65,000 feet for more than 24 hours and capable of searching an area of more than 40,000 square miles. The Global Hawk is deployed to Australia from April to June 2001, flying more than a dozen missions. These missions will include sorties in support of Tandem Thrust as well as maritime, littoral, land surveillance and stand off reconnaissance capabilities. The Global Hawk completed its first successful maiden flight in February 1998. Currently there are five U.S. Air Force Global Hawks which have logged over 60 flights and have clocked more than 600 hours, with it’s biggest challenge to date the non-stop Trans-Pacific flight from Edwards to Edinburgh. Tandem Thrust 2001 is a combined U.S., Australian and Canadian military training exercise. This biannual exercise is being held in the vicinity of Shoalwater Bay training area, Queensland, More than 27,000 soldiers, sailors, airmen and marines are participating, with Canadian units taking part as opposing forces. The purpose of Exercise Tandem Thrust is to train for crisis action planningand execution of contingency response operations. (U.S. Air Force photo by Staff Sgt. Jeremy T. Lock) (Released). Date Shot: 5/14/2001 |
Portrait of Systems Test Engineer Chuck Gardner, (left), and Avionics Technician Brent Bremer, from Northrop Grumman Edwards Air Force Base, California, as they pre-flight the RQ-4A Global Hawk at RAAF Base Edinburgh, Adelaide, Australia, in support of Exercise TANDEM THRUST 01. Able to cover more than 40,000 square miles, the jet powered Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) RQ-4A Global Hawk has a wing span of 116 feet, equal to a Boeing 737, able to fly up to 65,000 feet and loiter for more than 24 hours. The Global Hawk deployed to Australia from April to June 2001, flying more than a dozen missions. This Global Hawk completed its biggest challenge to date the non-stop Trans-Pacific flight from Edwards to Edinburgh to support TANDEM THRUST 01. TANDEM THRUST 2001 a combined US, Australian, and Canadian military exercise for crisis action planning and execution of contingency response operations. The biannual exercise is held in the vicinity of Shoalwater Bay training area in Queensland, Australia. Photographer’s Name: SSGT JEREMY LOCK, USAF. Date Shot: 5/13/2001 |
|
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=71T_EfFmNMo
Adolf Eichmann was a German Nazi and SS-Obersturmbannführer (Lieutenant Colonel) and one of the major organizers of the Holocaust. Because of his organizational talents and ideological reliability, Eichmann was charged by Obergruppenführer (General) Reinhard Heydrich with the task of facilitating and managing the logistics of mass deportation of Jews to ghettos and extermination camps in German-occupied Eastern Europe.
Read the rest at Wikipedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adolf_Eichmann
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ncixWejOc_8
Conspiracy “Wansee Conference” of January 1942 was the real beginning of the Holocaust In the sublime surroundings of a German country house, the assembled mingle for drinks, enjoy a first class buffet lunch and debate whether execution or sterilisation is the most efficient option of eliminating an entire race of people.
Is about the bureacratic genesis of the Holocaust. It shows, in more or less real time, a fictionalized version of a real-life conference of 15 officials from the SS/SD, Gestapo, Railway Ministry, Interior Ministry, Government General, and Ministry of Justice, which was chaired by Reinhard Heydrich and organized by Adolf Eichmann.
As a movie, however, it is really a study in the essential amorality of bureacracy and, to use a tired phrase, the banality of evil.
Credit must be given to Kenneth Branagh who propels the entire piece with one of the best portrayals on screen in memory. He is utterly convincing in the role of a man who epitomises the classic definition of evil: not just the doing of wrong, but the perversion of the human spirit so that it no longer has any perception of the good.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kenneth_Branagh
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stanley_Tucci
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colin_Firth
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0266425/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conspiracy_(2001_film)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nazi
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holocaust
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BBC
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HBO_Films
|
|
|
Official uncut theatrical version of Gene Fallaize’s ‘Superman: Requiem’ fan film, starring Martin Richardson, Stacy Sobieski, Paul Khanna, Serena Lorien, and Jack O’Halloran.
Superman is the world’s greatest super hero, and law enforcement across the globe has come to rely on him to deal with some of the major tasks that face society. When the Man of Steel loses some of his powers after an evil villain attacks him with Kryptonite though, he must overcome his obstacles and prove he really is a super man.
Superman: Requiem is a high-value fan-film that depicts the life of Superman several years after the events of Superman Returns, and takes into account the events of Superman (1978), Superman II (1980) and Superman Returns (2006), and focuses on an event by an evil villain who attempts to make Superman lose his powers.
The film was conceived in 2011 by producer Gene Fallaize who decided to he was going to make an independent Superman fan-film, and wrote the first draft of the script in less than a week. Fallaize brought Tony Cook on board to co-produce the project to allow him the freedom and time to direct the project.
The film was released globally online on 11.11.11 after a red carpet World Premiere in London’s Odeon Covent Garden.
For more information visit http://www.themanofsteelisback.com or facebook.com/supermanrequiem
The following document is an updated version of a 2009 “Domestic Extremism Lexicon” produced by the Department of Homeland Security’s Office of Intelligence and Analysis. The list of terms has been substantially reduced and does not include a number of controversial terms from the first version, such as “alternative media” and “direct action.” This version was obtained and published by a blogger associated with PJ Media.
![]()
![]()
![]()
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OxIoFZO_gNk
When bitten by a genetically modified spider, a nerdy, shy, and awkward high school student gains spider-like abilities that he eventually must use to fight evil as a superhero after tragedy befalls his family.

OSC has recently observed two Facebook pages and a popular blog that promote the recently established Syrian jihadist group Al-Nusrah Front and jihadist attacks in Syria. As these pages are the top results for a Google search in Arabic of “Al-Nusrah Front,” they are likely to be visited by Arabic-speaking Internet users interested in the group. Observed activity on these pages suggests expanding interest in Al-Nusrah Front.
The two Facebook pages — Insaru Jabhat al-Nusrah li-Ahl al-Sham and Jabhat al-Nusrah l-Ahal al-Sham – and a Syria-focused jihadist blog — Ansar al-Sham Network — have become the top three Arabic-language Google search results for “Al-Nusrah Front,” a Syrian jihadist group first announced in Januaryi that has claimed several attacks against regime targets there. This suggests the pages are becoming primary locations for Arabic-language materialglorifying Al-Nusrah Front.
- All three pages host Al-Nusrah Front’s official statements and the Facebook pages have been observed to further promote it by posting graphics, banners, and video compilations devoted to it.
- The pages all attempt to incite anger at the Al-Asad regime, with Insaru Jabhat al-Nusrah li-Ahl al-Sham posting content such as photographs of children reportedly killed in Syria and Jabhat al-Nusrah l-Ahal al-Sham and Ansar al-Sham Network prominently displaying articles and videos on Syrian “martyrs.”
- The Facebook pages also encourage attacks in Syria, by hosting basic military training materials, such as an instructional sniper video found on Insaru Jabhat al-Nusrah li-Ahl al-Sham. Similarly, Jabhat al-Nusrah l-Ahal al-Sham posts instructions for detonating a bomb without using a telephone trigger.
Facebook Activity Suggests Increasing Interest in Al-Nusrah Front
Although, thus far, users have indicated approval of the Facebook pages — by clicking the “like” buttons — relatively few times, the trend is increasing, suggesting heightened interest in Al-Nusrah Front. Statistics on readership of the pages are not available.
- As of 2 May, Insaru Jabhat al-Nusrah li-Ahl al-Sham readers have clicked “like” 481 times, and Jabhat al-Nusrah l-Ahal al-Sham users have done so 344 times.
- However, marking a substantial increase, during the week ending on 27 April, Insaru Jabhat al-Nusrah li-Ahl al-Sham received 143 “likes,” with 202 “people talking about” it. In contrast, during the week ending on 30 March –the earliest period for which data is available – the page received only 47 “likes,” with 60 users “talking about it.”
- Jabhat al-Nusrah l-Ahal al-Sham has experienced similar growth in activity. During the week ending on 27 April, it received 57 “likes” with 48 “people talking about” it, up substantially from 25 “likes” and 25 “people talking about it” in the week ending on 30 March.
The blog Ansar al-Sham Network reported between 33,000 and 78,000 views between 27 April and 5 May. Although it is not clear how the site calculates traffic, it appears to count visits on a daily, rather than cumulative basis. This high viewership offers further evidence of online interest in Al-Nusrah Front.

Dr. Abdullah Abdullah, center, head of the National Coalition of Afghanistan (NCA). Prominent members of the NCA and other rival parties have stated that they believe Afghan President Hamid Karzai is strengthening the Taliban in an effort to bolster his own power. Photo via Ariana News.
Public Intelligence
A recent report from the Director of National Intelligence’s Open Source Center (OSC) indicates that opposition parties increasingly believe that Afghan President Hamid Karzai is strengthening the Taliban in an effort to bolster his own political power. The report also assesses that members of Karzai’s camp may be willing to work with militant forces to prevent rival political parties from gaining influence.
Prominent members of two major opposition parties, the National Coalition of Afghanistan (NCA) and the National Front of Afghanistan (NFA), have expressed concern about Karzai’s connection with Taliban militants. At a meeting of the NFA leadership in Kabul in early April, former Vice President Ahmad Zia Massoud warned that the government is “working toward strengthening the terrorist groups” and that this being facilitated by “senior government leaders” who are “trying to facilitate the penetration of the Taliban into the security forces.”
A prominent member of the NCA former parliament speaker Mohmmad Yunos Qanuni recently stated in an interview with a Afghan news outlet that “Karzai’s thoughts are more inclined toward the Taliban than our lot [anti-Taliban forces],” adding that “individuals with pro-Taliban orientations have more of an impact on the president’s mind.” Qanuni made similar claims in an address to the youth wing of the NCA in April, warning that in an effort to perpetuate their rule, the government leadership is trying to “facilitate the return of terrorism and the Taliban.”
The author of the OSC report assesses that the “Afghan Government’s backing of the Taliban’s opening of an office in Qatar and the Afghan ambassador to Pakistan’s suggestive remarks, in a 3 April interview with UK’s Guardian newspaper, that negotiations would lead to the Taliban’s participation in presidential elections suggests that at least some in Karzai’s camp may be willing to court the militants to countervail the anti-Taliban forces’ influence.” The report also states that a merger between the NCA and NFA is likely before the 2014 elections, creating “two political, and possibly even militarized, rival clusters” that could have negative effects on the future stability of Afghanistan.
A long-time Seattle financial advisor was indicted today by a federal grand jury with 23 criminal counts, including wire fraud, money laundering and investment advisor fraud, announced U.S. Attorney Jenny A. Durkan. Mark F. Spangler, 57, of Seattle is accused of diverting investor money from accounts he managed to risky start-up ventures in which he or his investment firm had an ownership interest. Spangler allegedly diverted more than $46 million to two companies, one of which is now shut down after failing to generate any positive revenue. Those who invested in the funds managed by Spangler, as part of The Spangler Group Inc.(TSG), were not told that their money was being invested in risky start-up companies. Spangler and several of his companies went into receivership last year. Today, the Securities and Exchange Commission filed a civil suit against Spangler as well. Spangler is scheduled to appear in U.S. District Court in Seattle on May 18, 2012 at 2:30.
“The Department of Justice is making the prosecution of financial fraud a top priority,” said U.S. Attorney Durkan. “These investors lost millions to a man they trusted to safeguard their resources. We are working closely with the SEC to ensure Mr. Spangler is held accountable for his fraud.”
The six investors described in the indictment were told their funds were conservatively invested in publicly traded companies and in bonds. Spangler allegedly provided them misleading statements over time, falsely describing the value of their accounts and how the money was invested. When investors sought to liquidate their holdings, Spangler was unable to provide them any funds, because the money had been funneled to the high risk start-up ventures that were not profitable.
According to the indictment, Spangler established a variety of funds as early as 1998 to pool investor money to buy publicly traded stocks and bonds. Spangler co-founded the two startup companies in the early 2000s—Tamarac Inc. in 2000 and TeraHop Networks Inc. in 2002. Tamarac Inc. is headquartered in Seattle and provides software to financial planners. TeraHop Networks Inc. is headquartered in Georgia and manufactured wireless devices used to monitor the location and activity of people and physical assets such as construction equipment. TeraHop has ceased operation. Spangler not only failed to disclose to his investors that he was diverting significant amounts of their funds to TeraHop and Tamarac, but he also failed to disclose that he was involved in the management of these companies, had an ownership interest in Tamarac, and was receiving payments from both companies. The indictment contains an order of forfeiture, which will be used to try to recover assets for the investors.
The case is being investigated by the FBI and Internal Revenue Service Criminal Investigation (IRS-CI).
The case is being prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorneys Mike Lang and Carl Blackstone.
For additional information please contact Emily Langlie, Public Affairs Officer for the United States Attorney’s Office, at (206) 553-4110 or Emily.Langlie@USDOJ.Gov.

Open source reporting indicates the Afghan political landscape, presently dominated by four political groupings and a number of prominent politicians, is likely to undergo further changes in the lead-up to the presidential elections and withdrawal of ISAF forces in 2014. Differing views of the Taliban threat as ISAF withdraws is likely to help drive the realignment and consolidation of political forces. This realignment may result in two major groupings: President Hamid Karzai and allies keen on working with the Taliban versus former anti-Taliban forces and others opposed to the government’s alleged appeasement toward the militants. Such consolidation would likely lead the emerging generation of younger leaders to choose between joining one of the groupings or risk being marginalized at the national level. Four main political groupings — Karzai’s camp, the National Front of Afghanistan (NFA), the National Coalition of Afghanistan (NCA), and the Truth and Justice Party (TJP) — are currently dominating the Afghan political scene (See Appendix for more details on key figures and positions of the four groups).
In addition, there are a handful of prominent Afghan figures with links to some of these groupings, although currently they do not formally belong to any of them: Balkh Governor, Atta Mohammad Nur, Nangarhar Governor Gol Agha Sherzai, former intelligence chief Amrullah Saleh, Badakhshan MP Fawzia Koofi, Kabul MP Ramazan Bashardost, and Nangarhar MP Abdul Zaher Qadir.
…
Growing concerns about the Taliban threat and its role in post-2014 Afghanistan may consolidate the political landscape around two political, and possibly even militarized, rival clusters.
Should the NFA and NCA unify and attract major anti-Taliban leaders among Karzai’s allies, the remainder of the Karzai camp may rely increasingly on HI and some level of cooperation even from the Taliban to remain politically relevant.

DOWNLOAD THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT HERE

(U) The Healthcare and Public Health (HPH) sector is a multi-trillion dollar industry employing over 13 million personnel, including approximately five million first-responders with at least some emergency medical training, three million registered nurses, and more than 800,000 physicians.
(U) A significant portion of products used in patient care and management including diagnosis and treatment are Medical Devices (MD). These MDs are designed to monitor changes to a patient’s health and may be implanted or external. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulates devices from design to sale and some aspects of the relationship between manufacturers and the MDs after sale. However, the FDA cannot regulate MD use or users, which includes how they are linked to or configured within networks. Typically, modern MDs are not designed to be accessed remotely; instead they are intended to be networked at their point of use. However, the flexibility and scalability of wireless networking makes wireless access a convenient option for organizations deploying MDs within their facilities. This robust sector has led the way with medical based technology options for both patient care and data handling.
(U) The expanded use of wireless technology on the enterprise network of medical facilities and the wireless utilization of MDs opens up both new opportunities and new vulnerabilities to patients and medical facilities. Since wireless MDs are now connected to Medical information technology (IT) networks, IT networks are now remotely accessible through the MD. This may be a desirable development, but the communications security of MDs to protect against theft of medical information and malicious intrusion is now becoming a major concern. In addition, many HPH organizations are leveraging mobile technologies to enhance operations. The storage capacity, fast computing speeds, ease of use, and portability render mobile devices an optimal solution.
(U) This Bulletin highlights how the portability and remote connectivity of MDs introduce additional risk into Medical IT networks and failure to implement a robust security program will impact the organization’s ability to protect patients and their medical information from intentional and unintentional loss or damage.
…
(U) According to Health and Human Services (HHS), a major concern to the Healthcare and Public Health (HPH) Sector is exploitation of potential vulnerabilities of medical devices on Medical IT networks (public, private and domestic). These vulnerabilities may result in possible risks to patient safety and theft or loss of medical information due to the inadequate incorporation of IT products, patient management products and medical devices onto Medical IT Networks. Misconfigured networks or poor security practices may increase the risk of compromised medical devices. HHS states there are four factors which further complicate security resilience within a medical organization.
1. (U) There are legacy medical devices deployed prior to enactment of the Medical Device Law in 1976, that are still in use today.
2. (U) Many newer devices have undergone rigorous FDA testing procedures and come equipped with design features which facilitate their safe incorporation onto Medical IT networks. However, these secure design features may not be implemented during the deployment phase due to complexity of the technology or the lack of knowledge about the capabilities. Because the technology is so new, there may not be an authoritative understanding of how to properly secure it, leaving open the possibilities for exploitation through zero-day vulnerabilities or insecure deployment configurations. In addition, new or robust features, such as custom applications, may also mean an increased amount of third party code development which may create vulnerabilities, if not evaluated properly. Prior to enactment of the law, the FDA required minimal testing before placing on the market. It is challenging to localize and mitigate threats within this group of legacy equipment.
3. (U) In an era of budgetary restraints, healthcare facilities frequently prioritize more traditional programs and operational considerations over network security.
4. (U) Because these medical devices may contain sensitive or privacy information, system owners may be reluctant to allow manufactures access for upgrades or updates. Failure to install updates lays a foundation for increasingly ineffective threat mitigation as time passes.
…
(U) Implantable Medical Devices (IMD): Some medical computing devices are designed to be implanted within the body to collect, store, analyze and then act on large amounts of information. These IMDs have incorporated network communications capabilities to increase their usefulness. Legacy implanted medical devices still in use today were manufactured when security was not yet a priority. Some of these devices have older proprietary operating systems that are not vulnerable to common malware and so are not supported by newer antivirus software. However, many are vulnerable to cyber attacks by a malicious actor who can take advantage of routine software update capabilities to gain access and, thereafter, manipulate the implant.
(U) During an August 2011 Black Hat conference, a security researcher demonstrated how an outside actor can shut off or alter the settings of an insulin pump without the user’s knowledge. The demonstration was given to show the audience that the pump’s cyber vulnerabilities could lead to severe consequences. The researcher that provided the demonstration is a diabetic and personally aware of the implications of this activity. The researcher also found that a malicious actor can eavesdrop on a continuous glucose monitor’s (CGM) transmission by using an oscilloscope, but device settings could not be reprogrammed. The researcher acknowledged that he was not able to completely assume remote control or modify the programming of the CGM, but he was able to disrupt and jam the device.
DOWNLOAD THE ORIGINAL REPOERT HERE
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xacujAbauAo
Rambo heads into the rainforest on a mission to save the survived people of an village that has been attacked by the army.
Born of Hope is an independent feature film inspired by the Lord of the Rings and produced by Actors at Work Productions in the UK.
http://www.bornofhope.com
Thanks to Chris Bouchard and the H4G team for putting the film here. For more films by the makers of this and BoH extras please visit.
ActorsatWork
http://www.youtube.com/actorsatwork
Check them out for more videos regarding the film including the audio commentary.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=elt_l8zisik
A scattered people, the descendants of storied sea kings of the ancient West, struggle to survive in a lonely wilderness as a dark force relentlessly bends its will toward their destruction. Yet amidst these valiant, desperate people, hope remains. A royal house endures unbroken from father to son.
This 70 minute original drama is set in the time before the War of the Ring and tells the story of the Dúnedain, the Rangers of the North, before the return of the King. Inspired by only a couple of paragraphs written by Tolkien in the appendices of the Lord of the Rings we follow Arathorn and Gilraen, the parents of Aragorn, from their first meeting through a turbulent time in their people’s history.
Award winning unofficial prequel to The Lord Of The Rings dramatising Aragorn & Gandalf’s long search for Gollum directed by British filmmaker Chris Bouchard. Based faithfully on the appendices of the books this is a non-profit, serious homage to the writing of J.R.R Tolkien and the films of Peter Jackson.
It was shot on locations in England and Snowdonia with a team of over a hundred people working over the Internet. It took two years to make and was released as a non-profit Internet-only video by agreement with Tolkien Enterprizes.
This Youtube version is slightly extended with 1 scene added back in.
http://www.thehuntforgollum.com
DOWNLOAD THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT HERE
PENSACOLA, FL—B Christopher P. Gunn, 31, previously of Walton County, Florida, was indicted today on multiple charges involving the online sextortion and cyberstalking of young girls ranging in age from 13 to 17 years old. The indictment was announced by Pamela C. Marsh, United States Attorney for the Northern District of Florida.
The federal indictment alleges that Gunn, who was recently arrested on related charges in Alabama, extorted images and videos of minor females in “various states of undress, naked, and engaging in sexually explicit conduct.” The indictment also charges that Gunn violated federal cyberstalking statutes by engaging these females online with the “intent to injure, harass, and cause substantial emotional distress.” The conduct with which Gunn is charged in the Northern District of Florida is alleged to have occurred between October 2009 and March 2011. In total, the indictment alleges that Gunn victimized 11 minor females who resided in various states throughout the nation.
Gunn is currently in custody in Montgomery, Alabama on a federal indictment that also charges him with the production and possession of child pornography. If convicted on all charges in the Florida indictment, Gunn faces over 50 years in federal prison.
This case is being brought as part of Project Safe Childhood, a nationwide initiative launched in May 2006 by the Department of Justice to combat the growing epidemic of child sexual exploitation and abuse. Led by the United States Attorneys’ Offices and the Criminal Division’s Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section, Project Safe Childhood marshals federal, state, and local resources to locate, apprehend, and prosecute individuals who sexually exploit children and to identify and rescue victims. For more information about Project Safe Childhood, please visit http://www.justice.gov/psc/.
The case was investigated by the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the Walton County Sheriff’s Office. The case is being prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorney David L. Goldberg. An indictment is merely a formal charge by a grand jury that a defendant has committed a violation of federal criminal law. All defendants are presumed innocent unless and until the government proves their guilt beyond a reasonable doubt to the satisfaction of a jury at trial.
Der Anführer einer Yakuza-Organisation Tsukamoto deponiert für den Fall seiner Ermordung 100 Millionen Dollar für denjenigen, der seinen Tod rächen würde. Etwas später wird er getötet. Zahlreiche Menschen nehmen an einem Treffen der Killer teil, die den Auftrag ausführen könnten. Darunter befindet sich Fu, der früher ein Soldat einer Eliteeinheit war und in finanziellen Schwierigkeiten steckt. Fu verbündet sich mit dem Betrüger Ngok Lo.
Ngok Lo, der fortan als Agent von Fu fungiert, kauft seinem Geschäftspartner teure Bekleidung.
Eiji Tsukamoto, der Enkelsohn des Ermordeten, will den Mörder selbst töten. Er nimmt seinem Vater übel, dass Fremde den Tod dessen Vaters rächen sollten. Währenddessen nimmt Fu einen anderen Auftrag an, um die laufenden Kosten zu decken. Er tötet die Zielperson nicht, sondern verteidigt sie vor den anderen Killern, wofür er von dieser Person mit Geld belohnt wird. Er und Ngok Lo werden aber am Tatort verhaftet und vernommen. Ngok Los Tochter Kiki, die Jura studiert, holt beide aus dem Arrest. Er bringt Fu in seiner Wohnung unter — im einstigen Zimmer seiner Tochter. Er warnt Fu, dass dieser nicht für die bereits verlobte Kiki schwärmen soll.
Als Fu und Ngok Lo von Eiji Tsukamoto bedrängt werden, erzählt Ngok Fu, dass er ein Hochstapler ist. Weiterhin hat Ngok Lo in der Unterwelt verbreitet, er wäre der König der Killer. Aber, da Tsukamoto vom echten König der Killer umgebracht wurde, sind nun alle fälschlicherweise hinter ihm her.
Fu und Ngok treffen sich mit Tsukamoto. Dort kommt es zum großen Kampf, an dem auch der König der Killer plötzlich auftaucht und sich als Polizist zu erkennen gibt.
Es kommt zum Kampf zwischen dem König der Killer und Eiji, in dem Eiji Tsukamoto stirbt. Der Vorsitzende der Jury, die die Belohnung vergeben soll, willigt ein, der Version zuzustimmen, in der Eiji Tsukamoto der zu tötende Mörder war. Der König der Killer will seinen Platz Fu überlassen, der Ngok Lo als seinen Agenten feuert und stattdessen mit der Vermittlung der Aufträge dessen Tochter Kiki beauftragt.

The Money As A Weapon System – Afghanistan Commander’s Emergency Response Program Standard Operating Procedure supports the United States Government Integrated Civilian-Military Campaign Plan and ISAF Theater Campaign Plan (TCP). The Theater Campaign Plan lists objectives that include improving governance and socio-economic development in order to provide a secure environment for sustainable stability that is observable to the population. CERP provides an enabling tool that commanders can utilize to achieve these objectives. This is accomplished through an assortment of projects planned with desired COIN effects such as addressing urgent needs of the population, promoting GIRoA legitimacy, countering Taliban influence, increasing needed capacity, gaining access, building/expanding relationships, promoting economic growth, and demonstrating positive intent or goodwill.
The SOP recognizes and addresses the challenges that lie ahead as we continue the momentum of our campaign and through the challenges of transition. This revision implements policy changes, which are summarized within the summary of changes, to help improve oversight and management and incorporates the lessons we have learned to include measures adopted from the recommendations of various audits. Additionally, a broad spectrum of collaboration and research from several organizations and agencies was used to provide guidance as you plan CERP projects.
…
A. Counterinsurgency concepts, frameworks, and ideas ultimately find expression in activities involving investments of energy, time and resources. Projects are a primary means for executing governance since they incorporate decisions on the distribution of scarce resources, may involve negotiations on the nature of the social contract, and can create positive, interdependent relationships to allow the delivery of a service. Project management is the way to ensure these investments generate measurable returns. However, project management to COIN effects is not the same as project management to quality, timeline, scope or budget as there are different objectives with different means of judging whether the objectives are met. Project prioritization and selection must reinforce COIN objectives. The list of potential projects will always exceed the capacity to deliver. The major limiting factor will be the ability to execute and oversee projects rather than limited funding. The more technically challenging the project, the greater the need for direct presence to ensure quality. Less complex projects, by contrast, can reduce coalition forces direct presence while ensuring greater COIN effects.
B. Commander’s Emergency Response Program (CERP) projects (and similar stabilization funds) are vehicles for achieving effects. The desired effects are currently not well defined, measurable or standardized across projects. An effect can be:
1. Developmental, seeking to change society, build institutional capacity or promote economic improvement that is sustainable;
2. Humanitarian, seeking to alleviate human suffering without conditions or impartiality;
3. Force protection/hearts and minds, seeking to create a positive impression of coalition forces/Afghan National Security Forces (ANSF) in an effort to lessen attacks; or
4. Counterinsurgency, seeking to address causes of instability through fostering positive, interdependent relationships between the Government of the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan (GIRoA) and key populations.

DOWNLOAD THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT HERE
DOWNLOAD THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT HERE
DOWNLOAD THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT HERE
DOWNLOAD THE ORIGINAL FILE HERE
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4bJJ17n4KBM
Jet Li stellt in diesem Film den chinesischen Arzt und Meister der chinesischen Kampfkunst Hung Gar Kuen Wong Fei Hung dar, welcher aus der Provinz Fu-Shang stammt. Er macht zusammen mit seinem Gehilfen Fu und seiner Cousine Ji eine Reise zu einem internationalem Ärztekongress in Kanton. An diesem Treffen nehmen vor allem westliche Ärzte teil, und Dr. Wong soll als Gastredner die chinesische Akupunktur erklären.
Zu genau diesem Zeitpunkt findet in Kanton ein politischer Umsturz statt. Die Sekte des Weißen Lotus möchte alle westlichen Einflüsse auf die chinesische Kultur mit Gewalt fernhalten. Cousine Ji, die sich nach westlicher Manier kleidet, bekommt bei einer Kundgebung des Weißen Lotus Probleme und soll entführt werden, welches Wong Fei Hung erfolgreich verhindern kann, worauf ihm der Anführer der Sekte, Meister Kung, Rache schwört.
Auf dem Ärztekongress lernt Wong Fei Hung Bruder Sun Yat-sen kennen, der die westliche Medizin studiert hat. Die beiden halten den Vortrag zusammen. Bruder Su will ebenfalls einen politischen Umsturz herbeiführen, aber mit friedlichen Mitteln. Sein Ziel ist es, China zu einer Republik zu machen.
Als das linguistische Institut vom Weißen Lotus angegriffen wird, können Wong Fei Hung, Fu und Cousine Ji eine Gruppe Kinder retten. Diese wollen sie zuerst in der Stadthalle unterbringen, aber der Leutnant der chinesischen Garde erklärt Dr. Wong, dass er für den Schutz der Kinder nicht garantieren kann. Daraufhin bringen die Gefährten diese im britischen Konsulat unter. Dort treffen sie auf Bruder Luk, den Leiter des linguistischen Institutes, der ein Freund und Mitverschwörer von Bruder Su ist. Damit der Leutnant der chinesischen Garde die beiden gefangen nehmen kann, ebnet er dem Weißen Lotus den Weg, damit diese das Britische Konsulat verwüsten können. Durch eine List und mit der Hilfe von Wong Fei Hung kann Bruder Luk entkommen.
Anschließend machen sich Wong Fei Hung und Bruder Luk auf den Weg, um den Tempel des Weißen Lotus zu zerstören und den geistigen Führer Kung umzubringen. Nach erfolgreichem Abschluss machen sie sich auf den Weg, um sich wieder mit Fu zu treffen und an die Anlegestelle zu kommen, wo sie sich mit den anderen auf dem Schiff nach Ton Ga Bay absetzen wollen. Vorher müssen sie noch die Namensliste mit den Anhängern des friedlichen Umsturzes aus dem Versteck holen. Dort werden sie von der chinesischen Garde angegriffen. Bruder Luk wird dabei getötet. Der Leutnant und Wong Fei Hung stellen sich noch dem finalen Kampf.

21st‐Century Marine Expeditionary Intelligence Analysis (MEIA‐21) is a formal initiative to structure, standardize, and professionalize tactical intelligence analysis in the Marine Corps. It professionalizes Marine expeditionary intelligence, equipping intelligence analysts with analytically rigorous Structured Models, Approaches, and Techniques (SMATs)—applied tradecraft—to provide commanders with actionable, reliable tactical intelligence in conventional and irregular warfare while also instilling the cognitive and creative skills to create and refine that tradecraft. … Core Principles of MEIA‐21 MEIA‐21 is the process of building analytic modernization on six foundational principles: 1. Successful operations require reliable tactical intelligence. Operations are command led and intelligence fed. 2. Reliable tactical intelligence is achieved through structured, mission‐specific applied tradecraft. – Tradecraft is the SMATs that analysts use to develop actionable intelligence from raw data. – SMATs originate from field‐derived, experiential learning by Marine intelligence analysts. – Foundational skills, such as Structured Analytic Techniques (SATs), und0erlie the development and application of mission‐specific tradecraft. 3. Tradecraft‐driven intelligence analysis is conducted using analytically rigorous processes. – Marine Corps intelligence analysis must move beyond a reliance on raw intuition and readily available information to scientifically valid, objective techniques. – Processes and tools (SMATs) must be vetted for analytic rigor, formalized, documented, and taught. – Sustainable analytic rigor requires ongoing critical review and continuous improvement of tradecraft. 4. Social Science Intelligence (SSI) is essential for successful intelligence analysis in COIN and other nonconventional operations. It also is critical for conventional operations. – Without structured consideration of social factors, our knowledge of human‐centered problems is subjective, unscientific, overly informed by raw intuition, and less reliable. – SSI uses structured models, approaches, and techniques based upon proven principles and practices from economics, political science, anthropology, and other disciplines that study human behavior. – Applied social science is an important way to develop understanding (insight and foresight) in the context of operational requirements. 5. In an era of enormous quantities of potentially useful data, technology is critical to intelligence work. – People—not tools—perform analysis, but machine‐aided analysis can help analysts organize, store, and cut through massive amounts of data to discover the nonobvious and unseen and to identify otherwise invisible patterns. – Technology empowers analysts to archive, organize, discover, and retrieve information for near‐real‐time analysis. – Models and tools not only save time and cognitive energy, they correct fallible human senses and intuition that, left unaided, may misrepresent reality or distort analysis. 6. Intelligence analysis is a profession and should be structured as such. – Mastery of tradecraft, not job title, defines the profession of Marine Corps intelligence analysis. – Marine intelligence analysts must have a deep knowledge of tradecraft. Area expertise is valuable, but inadequate to develop actionable intelligence or reliable knowledge in the absence of structured applied tradecraft. – Structured tools, methods, and processes must be disseminated and institutionalized through formal training, standards, and continuing education. Intelligence analysts should be certified in the practice of their profession. … Social Science Intelligence and the New Analytic Environment Marine Corps warfighting has primarily been based on the capability to find, fix, and strike the enemy force. To support this, Marine Corps tactical intelligence was often kinetics‐based, target‐centric, and optimized for producing intelligence against conventional military formations. Adversaries were well defined, providing a relatively sharp focus for intelligence. But 10 years of operations in Iraq and Afghanistan have repeatedly shown that armed groups confronting Marines today avoid U.S. targeting superiority by operating asymmetrically within congested and cluttered environments. Contending with conventional, counterinsurgency (COIN), and nonconventional operations in the upcoming decades of the 21st century, Marines will once again be exposed to socially complex environments and hybrid armed groups. Many of these threats (conventional and nonconventional) and adversaries (state, state proxies, and nonstate actors) will be more agile, less visible, and possess an information advantage where it is easier for them to see and target us than for us to see and target them. Given this operational environment, the MCISR‐E must analyze more than an adversary’s characteristics and capabilities. Expeditionary intelligence must incorporate the context within which adversaries operate; the institutions within which they live; and their fears, perceptions, and motivations; in short, we must consider the totality of the human sphere. This new approach to intelligence analysis, focusing on understanding human social organization is called Social Science Intelligence (SSI). There has been significant growth in the techniques and technologies of intelligence analysis, especially in the social sciences such as economics, political science, anthropology, and other disciplines relating to the study of human behavior. Because the most advanced knowledge in these fields is dispersed within academia and not directly focused on intelligence‐related problems, it’s hard to access and consequently plays an inadequate role in tactical intelligence today—Marine intelligence analysts’ knowledge of human‐centered problems tends to be subjective, unscientific, technologically weak, and based mostly on the raw intuition and personal experience of the individual analyst. The challenge is to develop, refine, and deploy applied techniques that enable us to understand the totality of the human domain framework with speed and precision. An analytic modernization plan that captures critical best practices, leverages the best social and physical science know‐how available, and makes available sophisticated analytic instruments that analysts can readily apply to intelligence problems is critical to success. When made available, these methods and approaches give analysts social and physical science expertise from the fields that parallel the questions faced by intelligence (e.g., accounting, organizational theory, elite analysis, political science, economics, and census/registry).
DOWNLOAD THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT HERE
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TKfH3T-YGyE
Jet Li stars as Tai Feng (aka Fu). a hitman with a `sense of justice` and a talent for deliberately missing his intended victims. When his streetwise agent Sam (Eric Tsang) uses Tai`s awesome fighting skills to acquire billions of dollars at the expense of heavy-hitting Japanese mobsters, the scene is set for a martial-arts showdown of ground-breaking proportions. An exhilarating, suspenseful action-drama combining elements of black humour and s sense of style, Hitman packs the king of resounding punch you would expect from the world`s most enigmatic action star. Jet Li is more lethal than ever as the Hitman!
DOWNLOAD THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT HERE
DOWNLOAD THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT HERE
Jet Li,Wen Zhang,Kwai Lun Mei,Chen Rui
NSA TEMPEST History: http://cryptome.org/2012/05/nsa-tempest-history.pdf
22 June 2011:
Joel McNamara’s comprehensive Complete, Unofficial TEMPEST Information Page has closed. A mirror: http://www.kubieziel.de/blog/uploads/complete_unofficial_tempest_page.pdf
6 April 2003: Add
NCSC 3 – TEMPEST Glossary, 30 March 1981
5 March 2002: Two security papers announced today on optical Tempest risks:
Information Leakage from Optical Emanations, J. Loughry and D.A. Umphress
Optical Time-Domain Eavesdropping Risks of CRT Displays, Markus Kuhn
For emissions security, HIJACK, NONSTOP and TEAPOT, see also Ross Anderson’s Security Engineering, Chapter 15.
HIJACK, NONSTOP, and TEAPOT Vulnerabilities
A STU-III is a highly sophisticated digital device; however, they suffer from a particular nasty vulnerability to strong RF signals that if not properly addressed can cause the accidental disclosure of classified information, and recovery of the keys by an eavesdropper. While the unit itself is well shielded, the power line feeding the unit may not have a clean ground (thus negating the shielding).
If the encryption equipment is located within six to ten wavelengths of a radio transmitter (such as a cellular telephone, beeper, or two way radio) the RF signal can mix with the signals inside the STU and carry information to an eavesdropper. This six to ten wavelengths is referred to as the “near field” or the wave front where the magnetic field of the signal is stronger then the electrical field.
The best way to deal with this is to never have a cellular telephone or pager on your person when using a STU, or within a radius of at least thirty feet (in any direction) from an operational STU (even with a good ground). If the STU is being used in a SCIF or secure facility a cell phone is supposed to be an excluded item, but it is simply amazing how many government people (who know better) forget to turn off their phone before entering controlled areas and thus cause classified materials to be compromised.
Spook Hint: If you have a powered up NEXTEL on your belt and you walk within 12 feet of a STU-III in secure mode you have just compromised the classified key.
— Secure Telephone Units, Crypto Key Generators, Encryption Equipment, and Scramblers (offsite)
Files at Cryptome.org: tempest-time.htm TEMPEST Timeline tempest-old.htm TEMPEST History NSA Documents Obtained by FOIA nacsem-5112.htm NACSEM 5112 NONSTOP Evaluation Techniques nstissi-7000.htm NSTISSI No. 7000 TEMPEST Countermeasures for Facilities nacsim-5000.htm NACSIM 5000 Tempest Fundamentals nacsim-5000.zip NACSIM 5000 Tempest Fundamentals (Zipped 570K) nsa-94-106.htm NSA No. 94-106 Specification for Shielded Enclosures tempest-2-95.htm NSTISSAM TEMPEST/2-95 Red/Black Installation Guidance nt1-92-1-5.htm NSTISSAM TEMPEST 1/92 - TOC and Sections 1-5 nt1-92-6-12.htm NSTISSAM TEMPEST 1/92 - Sections 6-12 nstissam1-92a.htm NSTISSAM TEMPEST 1/92 - Appendix A (TEMPEST Overview) nt1-92-B-M.htm NSTISSAM TEMPEST 1/92 - Appendixes B-M nt1-92-dist.htm NSTISSAM TEMPEST 1/92 - Distribution List nsa-reg90-6.htm NSA/CSS Reg. 90-6, Technical Security Program nsa-foia-app2.htm NSA Letter Releasing TEMPEST Documents nsa-foia-app.htm NSA FOIA Appeal for TEMPEST Information nsa-foia-req.htm NSA FOIA Request for TEMPEST Documents Other TEMPEST Documents nsa-etpp.htm NSA Endorsed TEMPEST Products Program nsa-ettsp.htm NSA Endorsed TEMPEST Test Services Procedures nsa-zep.htm NSA Zoned Equipment Program nstissam1-00.htm Maintenance and Disposition of TEMPEST Equipment (2000) nstissi-7000.htm TEMPEST Countermeasures for Facilities (1993) tempest-fr.htm French TEMPEST Documentation (2000) af-hb202d.htm US Air Force EI Tempest Installation Handbook (1999) afssi-7010.htm US Air Force Emission Security Assessments (1998) afssm-7011.htm US Air Force Emission Security Countermeasure Reviews (1998) qd-tempest.htm Quick and Dirty TEMPEST Experiment (1998) mil-hdbk-1195.htm Radio Frequency Shielded Enclsoures (1988) emp.htm US Army Electromagnetic Pulse (EMP) and TEMPEST Protection for Facilities (1990) zzz1002.htm National TEMPEST School Courses (1998) navch16.htm Chapter 16 of US Navy's Automated Information Systems Security Guidelines tempest-cpu.htm Controlled CPU TEMPEST emanations (1999) tempest-door.htm TEMPEST Door (1998) bema-se.htm Portable Radio Frequency Shielded Enclosures (1998) datasec.htm Data Security by Architectural Design, George R. Wilson (1995) rs232.pdf The Threat of Information Theft by Reception of Electromagnetic Radiation from RS-232 Cables, Peter Smulders (1990) tempest-law.htm Laws On TEMPEST, Christopher Seline (1989) tempest-leak.htm The Tempest Over Leaking Computers, Harold Highland (1988) bits.pdf Electromagnetic Eavesdropping Machines for bits.htm Christmas?, Wim Van Eck (1988) nsa-vaneck.htm NSA, Van Eck, Banks TEMPEST (1985) emr.pdf Electromagnetic Radiation from Video Display Units: An Eavesdropping Risk?, Wim Van Eck (1985)
After a sudden attack on the MI5, Johnny English, Britain’s most confident yet unintelligent spy, becomes Britain’s only spy.
[Rowan Atkinson]
REALLY GOOD COMEDY!
UNCONVENTIONAL OIL AND GAS PRODUCTION
Opportunities and Challenges of Oil Shale Development
Statement of Anu K. Mittal, Director Natural Resources and Environment
Testimony
Before the Subcommittee on Energy and Environment, Committee on Science, Space, and Technology, House of Representatives
DOWNLOD THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT HERE
Liebe Leser,
ich habe Ihnen versprochen die Hintergründe der STASI-“GoMoPa” aufzudecken.
Ich habe dies getan.
Wir werden nicht ruhen, bevor diese Kriminellen und ihre Auftraggeber und Helfer ausgeschaltet sind.
Aus verständlichen Gründen gebe ich hier keine weiteren Infos an.
Herzlichst Ihr
Bernd Pulch,
MA PUBLIZISTIK, GERMANISTIK, KOMPARATISTIK
DOWNLOAD THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT HERE
In Mexico City, a former assassin swears vengeance on those who committed an unspeakable act against the family he was hired to protect.

A U.S. military photo of tribal leaders from Central and West Iraq gathering to celebrate the signing of the Iraqi Transportation Network (ITN) tribal agreement for Central Iraq. The ITN is reportedly the model for a current effort to construct an Afghanistan Transportation Network.
A contracting document for a major transportation project in Afghanistan indicates that the U.S. military is preferentially awarding contracts to companies owned by tribal elders who wield significant power within Afghan society. The performance work statement for the Afghanistan Transportation Network – Southwest/West, which was recently published by the website Cryptocomb, describes a “network of U.S. Government (USG) approved Afghan privately owned trucking companies, otherwise known as Elder Owned Companies (EOC’s or Sub-Contractors) operating under a Management Company (Prime Contractor) to provide secure and reliable means of distributing reconstruction material, security equipment, fuel, miscellaneous dry cargo, and life support assets and equipment throughout the Combined/Joint Operations Area – Afghanistan (CJOA-A) to and from Forward Operating Bases (FOBs) and Distribution Sites located in the Regional Command (RC) – Southwest and RC – West without the use of convoy security.”
The Afghanistan Transportation Network is reportedly modeled after a similar program in Iraq that utilized significant sheiks within Iraqi tribes to form companies providing trucking services for U.S. operations. A 2009 article from the U.S. Navy’s Supply Corps described the Iraqi Transportation Network (ITN) as a way of “seeding” Iraqi industry that is “tribal based, engaging powerful sheiks and their tribes to protect the road” in exchange for “transportation jobs for their tribal members.” During this process of tribal engagement, sheiks are vetted by U.S. authorities and meet with ITN business representatives who help them to form companies that can ultimately use their tribal members to perform trucking and other transportation jobs, thus eliminating the need for increased security. The U.S. Navy article describes the Iraqi Transportation Network as a form of “irregular warfare through economic means” helping to promote peace and stability on a tribal level.
The Afghanistan Transportation Network (ATN) operates similarly to the Iraqi model, utilizing “Influential Leader Engagement Teams” to identify key tribal elders that can be vetted by U.S. forces. These teams “meet with Elders in villages along routes of interest for coalition forces distribution” to “identify potential influential leaders for program inclusion and determine the influential leader’s sphere of influence.” These leaders are then able to form a registered Elder Owned Companies (EOC) to perform transportation and trucking services within their particular region. If new routes are needed for the deployment of U.S. forces, the program uses engagement teams to “find local Influential Leaders/Tribal Elders, conduct Tribal Elder/Influential engagements, and identify and nominate new Influential Leaders to add to an existing EOC, or form new EOCs depending on tribal dynamics, to the Regional Command for inclusion in the ATN-Southwest/West program.”
The document contains an appendix with an approved list of EOCs and a guide for finding other tribal elders who can expand the program and potentially create their own companies. A form for assessing potential tribal elders asks for “Elder Name; Father’s Name; Age; Province; District; Tribe; Reach of Influence; Closest Fob [Forward Operating Base] to Elder; Elder’s view of GIRoA [Government of the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan]; Elder Background.”
The source that provided the document to Cryptocomb reportedly describes the practice of paying Afghan tribal elders as an attempt at “buying hearts and minds” in Afghanistan. However, statistics on the Iraqi Transportation Network from 2009 indicate that the program was able to almost entirely eliminate loss of cargo while freeing up troops to perform other functions, rather than providing security, and employing a large number of civilians. There is a significant potential for abuse and corruption as a result of the program, as it essentially funnels money to a handful of influential tribal leaders in the hope of purchasing some form of stability. The contracting document for the Afghan version of the program states that “restrictions associated with other ATN procurements or ATN approved or nominated EOCs are intended to promote procurement integrity while maximizing the COIN impact of the ATN program to ensure actions under the contract do not create the potential for Elders/Influential Leaders to become Warlords or unduly influence or interfere with regional or provincial stability.”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QsNiDaUBR-g&feature=watch-now-button&wide=1
Three soldiers must fight to survive the night in a seemingly abandoned house, when a zombie platoon attacks.

Nachfolgend bringen wir eine Original-Pressemeldung von „GoMoPa“, dem „NACHRICHTENDIENST“ mit dem Meridian Capital, London, erpresst werden sollte. Der Artikel strotzt nur von Fehlern. Damit ist deutlich, dass „GoMoPa“ tatsäch Meridian Capital erpresst hat und die Aktionen von Meridian Capital sich gegen „GoMoPa“ gerichtet haben.
Die gefälschte Pressemitteilung von Meridian Capital in Bezug auf unser Haus soll von dem „NACHRICHTENDIENST“ „GoMoPa“ ablenken.
„GoMopa“ schreibt:
08.09.2008
Weltweite Finanzierungen mit Widersprüchen
Die Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. gibt an, weltweite Finanzierungen anbieten zu können und präsentiert sich hierbei auf aufwendig kreierten Webseiten. GOMOPA hat die dort gemachten Angaben analysiert und Widersprüche entdeckt.
Der Firmensitz
Der Firmensitz befindet sich laut eigener Aussage in Dubai, Vereinigte Arabische Emirate. In einem GOMOPA vorliegenden Schreiben der Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. heißt es jedoch, der Firmensitz sei in London. Auf der Homepage des Unternehmens taucht die Geschäftsadresse in der Londoner Old Broad Street nur als „Kundenabteilung für deutschsprachige Kunden“ auf. Eine weitere Adresse in der englischen Hauptstadt, diesmal in der Windsor Avenue, sei die „Abteilung der Zusammenarbeit mit Investoren“.
Die Meridian Capital Enterprises ist tatsächlich als „Limited“ (Ltd.) mit Sitz in England und Wales eingetragen. Aber laut Firmenhomepage hat das Unternehmen seinen „rechtlichen Geschäftssitz“ in Dubai. Eine Abfrage beim Gewerbeamt Dubais (DED) zu dieser Firmierung bleibt ergebnislos.
Bemerkenswert ist auch der vermeintliche Sitz in Israel. Auf der Webseite von Meridian Capital Enterprises heißt es: „Die Firma Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. ist im Register des israelischen Justizministeriums unter der Nummer 514108471, gemäß dem Gesellschaftsrecht von 1999, angemeldet.“ Hierzu Martin Kraeter, Gomopa-Partner und Prinzipal der KLP Group Emirates in Dubai: „Es würde keinem einzigen Emirati – geschweige denn einem Scheich auch nur im Traum einfallen, direkte Geschäfte mit Personen oder Firmen aus Israel zu tätigen. Und schon gar nicht würde er zustimmen, dass sein Konterfei auch noch mit vollem Namen auf der Webseite eines Israelischen Unternehmens prangt.“
Auf der Internetseite sind diverse Fotos mit Scheichs an Konferenztischen zu sehen. Doch diese großen Tagungen und großen Kongresse der Meridian Capital Enterprises werden in den Pressearchiven der lokalen Presse Dubais mit keinem Wort erwähnt.
Martin Kraeter: „ Ein ‚britisch-arabisch-israelisches bankfremdes Finanzinstitut sein zu wollen, wie die Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. es darstellt, ist mehr als zweifelhaft. So etwas gibt es schlicht und ergreifend nicht! Der Nahostkonflikt schwelt schon seit mehr als 50 Jahren. Hier in den Vereinigten Arabischen Emiraten (VAE) werden Israelis erst gar nicht ins Land gelassen. Israelische Produkte sind gebannt. Es gibt nicht einmal direkte Telefonverbindungen. Die VAE haben fast 70% der Wiederaufbaukosten des Libanon geschultert, nachdem Israel dort einmarschiert ist.“
Zwei angebliche Großinvestitionen der Meridian Capital Enterprises in Dubai sind Investmentruinen bzw. erst gar nicht realisierte Projekte. Das Unternehmen wirbt mit ihrer finanziellen Beteiligung an dem Dubai Hydropolis Hotel und dem Dubai Snowdome.
Der Aktivitätsstatus der Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. ist laut englischen Handelsregister (UK Companies House) „dormant“ gemeldet. Auf der Grundlage des englischen Gesellschaftsrechts können sich eingetragene Unternehmen selbst „dormant“ (schlafend) melden, wenn sie keine oder nur unwesentliche buchhalterisch zu erfassende Transaktionen vorgenommen haben. Dies ist angesichts der angeblichen globalen Investitionstätigkeit der Meridian Capital Ltd. sehr erstaunlich.
Der Webauftritt
Die Internetseite der MCE ist sehr aufwendig gestaltet, die Investitionen angeblich in Millionen- und Milliardenhöhe. Bei näherer Betrachtung der Präsentationselemente fällt jedoch auf, dass es sich bei zahlreichen veröffentlichen Fotos, die Veranstaltungen der Meridian Capital Enterprises dokumentieren sollen, meist um Fotos von Online-Zeitungen oder frei zugänglichen Medienfotos einzelner Institutionen handelt wie z.B. der Börse Dubai.
Auf der Internetpräsenz befinden sich Videofilmchen, die eine frappierende Ähnlichkeit mit dem Werbematerial von NAKHEEL aufweisen, dem größten Bauträger der Vereinigten Arabischen Emirate. Doch den schillernden Videos über die berühmten drei Dubai Palmen „Jumeirah, Jebel Ali und Deira“ oder das Archipel „The World“ wurden offensichtlich selbstproduzierte Trailersequenzen der Meridian Capital Enterprises vorangestellt. Doch könnte es sich bei den Werbevideos um Fremdmaterial handeln.
Auch die auf der Webseite wahllos platzierten Fotos von bekannten Sehenswürdigkeiten Dubais fungieren als Augenfang für den interessierten Surfer mit eigenem Finanzierungswunsch. Bei einem Volumen von 10 Millionen Euro oder höher präsentiert sich die Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. als der passende Investitionspartner. Das Unternehmen verfügt weltweit über zahlreiche Standorte: Berlin, London, Barcelona, Warschau, Moskau, Dubai, Riad, Tel Aviv, Hong Kong und New York. Aber nahezu alle Standorte sind lediglich Virtual Offices eines global arbeitenden Büroservice-Anbieters. „Virtual Office“ heißt im Deutschen schlicht „Briefkastenfirma“. Unter solchen Büroadressen sollen laut Meridian Capital Enterprises ganze Kommissionen ansässig sein, alles zum Wohle des Kunden.“
Zitatende
Dies ist das altbekannte Muster des „NACHRCHTENDIENSTES“ „GoMoPa“ und seiner Berliner und Hamburger Komplizen Falschmeldungen zu verbreiten, um Firmen und Personen erpressen oder ausschalten zu können.
Originaltexte (SIEHE AUCH ANLAGE ANBEI)
FINANZNACHRICHTEn meridian gomopa
Millionen Finanzierungen mit Widersprüchen / Die Werbemethoden der Meridian Capital Enterprises
ZUM DOWNLOAD OBEN CLICKEN
ORIGINAL -STELLUNGNAHME DER MERIDIAN CAPITAL HIER:
http://meridiancapital.wordpress.com/2011/06/12/stasi-falschungen-der-gomopa/
United States Attorney Robert Pitman and Federal Bureau of Investigation Special Agent in Charge Cory B. Nelson announced that 21-year-old Naser Jason Abdo faces new charges in connection with a July bomb plot in Killeen, Texas.
This afternoon, a federal grand jury in Waco returned a superseding indictment against Abdo charging him with one count of attempted use of a weapon of mass destruction; one count of attempted murder of officers or employees of the United States, two counts of possession of a firearm in furtherance of a federal crime of violence; and two counts of possession of a destructive device in furtherance of a federal crime of violence.
The six-count superseding indictment specifically alleges that on July 27, 2011, Abdo unlawfully attempted to create and detonate a bomb in an attempt to kill, with pre-meditation and malice aforethought, members of the uniformed services of the United States and to shoot survivors of said detonation with a firearm. The indictment further alleges that on July 27, 2011, Abdo did knowingly possess a .40 caliber semi-automatic pistol while carrying out his plot.
According to court records, officers with the Killeen Police Department arrested Abdo on July 27, 2011. At the time of his arrest, the defendant, an absent without leave (AWOL) soldier from Fort Campbell, Kentucky, was in possession of the handgun, plus instructions on how to build a bomb as well as bomb making components. Court documents also allege that Abdo intended to detonate the destructive device inside an unspecified restaurant frequented by soldiers from Fort Hood.
The federal grand jury returned an initial indictment in this case on August 9, 2011. While those charges—possession of an unregistered destructive device, possession of a firearm by a fugitive from justice and possession of ammunition by a fugitive from justice—remain in effect, prosecutors will first proceed on the charges contained in the superseding indictment.
Abdo remains in federal custody. If convicted of the charges contained in the superseding indictment, Abdo faces up to life in federal prison for the attempted use of a weapon of mass destruction charge; up to 20 years in federal prison for the attempted murder charge; a mandatory 30 years’ imprisonment for each possession of a destructive device in furtherance of a federal crime of violence charge; and, a mandatory five years in federal prison for each possession of a firearm in furtherance of a federal crime of violence charge.
This case is being investigated by agents with the Federal Bureau of Investigation together with U.S. Army Criminal Investigation Command, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, Killeen Police Department and the Texas Department of Public Safety. Assistant United States Attorneys Mark Frazier and Gregg Sofer are prosecuting this case on behalf of the government.
An indictment is merely a charge and should not be considered as evidence of guilt. The defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.
United States Attorney Robert Pitman and Federal Bureau of Investigation Special Agent in Charge Cory B. Nelson announced that 21-year-old Naser Jason Abdo faces new charges in connection with a July bomb plot in Killeen, Texas.
This afternoon, a federal grand jury in Waco returned a superseding indictment against Abdo charging him with one count of attempted use of a weapon of mass destruction; one count of attempted murder of officers or employees of the United States, two counts of possession of a firearm in furtherance of a federal crime of violence; and two counts of possession of a destructive device in furtherance of a federal crime of violence.
The six-count superseding indictment specifically alleges that on July 27, 2011, Abdo unlawfully attempted to create and detonate a bomb in an attempt to kill, with pre-meditation and malice aforethought, members of the uniformed services of the United States and to shoot survivors of said detonation with a firearm. The indictment further alleges that on July 27, 2011, Abdo did knowingly possess a .40 caliber semi-automatic pistol while carrying out his plot.
According to court records, officers with the Killeen Police Department arrested Abdo on July 27, 2011. At the time of his arrest, the defendant, an absent without leave (AWOL) soldier from Fort Campbell, Kentucky, was in possession of the handgun, plus instructions on how to build a bomb as well as bomb making components. Court documents also allege that Abdo intended to detonate the destructive device inside an unspecified restaurant frequented by soldiers from Fort Hood.
The federal grand jury returned an initial indictment in this case on August 9, 2011. While those charges—possession of an unregistered destructive device, possession of a firearm by a fugitive from justice and possession of ammunition by a fugitive from justice—remain in effect, prosecutors will first proceed on the charges contained in the superseding indictment.
Abdo remains in federal custody. If convicted of the charges contained in the superseding indictment, Abdo faces up to life in federal prison for the attempted use of a weapon of mass destruction charge; up to 20 years in federal prison for the attempted murder charge; a mandatory 30 years’ imprisonment for each possession of a destructive device in furtherance of a federal crime of violence charge; and, a mandatory five years in federal prison for each possession of a firearm in furtherance of a federal crime of violence charge.
This case is being investigated by agents with the Federal Bureau of Investigation together with U.S. Army Criminal Investigation Command, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, Killeen Police Department and the Texas Department of Public Safety. Assistant United States Attorneys Mark Frazier and Gregg Sofer are prosecuting this case on behalf of the government.
An indictment is merely a charge and should not be considered as evidence of guilt. The defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.
News vom GoMoPa-CEO persönlich!
ZITAT-ANFANG
Liebe(r) Helmut,
wenn plötzlich der Staatsanwalt und Beamte der Antikorruptionseinheit mit einem Durchsuchungsbeschluss vor der Tür stehen, machen selbst erfahrene Manager Fehler, die das Unternehmen teuer zu stehen kommen. Für das richtige Verhalten im Notfall bietet die Münchener Kanzlei Noerr LLC seit dem 15. Juni 2011 ein kostenloses App fürs iPhone, iPod touch und iPad an. Der „Dawn Raid Guide“ bietet einen schnellen und einfachen Überblick:
ZITAT-ENDE
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.
| Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10BERLIN164 | 2010-02-05 15:32 | 2010-11-28 18:00 | CONFIDENTIAL | Embassy Berlin |
VZCZCXRO7703 OO RUEHSL DE RUEHRL #0164/01 0361532 ZNY CCCCC ZZH O 051532Z FEB 10 FM AMEMBASSY BERLIN TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 6496 INFO RUCNFRG/FRG COLLECTIVE PRIORITY RUEHZG/NATO EU COLLECTIVE PRIORITY RUEHBUL/AMEMBASSY KABUL PRIORITY 0690 C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 BERLIN 000164 SIPDIS E.O. 12958: DECL: 02/05/2020 TAGS: OTRA MARR NATO PARM PINS PREL PGOV GM AF IR SUBJECT: WESTERWELLE ON AFGHANISTAN, IRAN, TAC NUKES Classified By: Classified by Political M-C George Glass for reasons 1.4 (b,d). ¶1. (C) German FM Westerwelle told Amb February 5 that it was important to refocus Afghanistan efforts on civilian reconstruction; that we needed to avoid suggesting German troops engaged in less risk than other countries; that he did not invite Iranian FM Mottaki to Germany or seek a meeting with him; that any discussion of non-strategic nuclear weapons needed to be conducted at 28 at NATO; and that he could not influence any decision by the European Parliament on the SWIFT agreement. END SUMMARY. ¶2. (C) The Ambassador asked about Westerwelle's first 100 days in office. Though in an ebullient mood, Westerwelle said things were very difficult (FDP slipped another percentage point in the polls hours before the meeting). He said he had been in France February 4 for a joint cabinet meeting, but that nothing substantive came of it. He observed that one never really knew what was going to happen with Sarkozy involved. -------------- AFGHANISTAN ------------- ¶3. (C) The Ambassador reviewed his own recent trip to Afghanistan. He shared his impression that the Germans were doing a superb job at all levels from the RC-North commander on down. He learned how critical mentoring and partnering with Afghan security forces had become. He noted that the U.S. was sending substantial forces to RC-North, where they would conduct training and be under German command. Westerwelle responded that this was important for Germany and for international cooperation. The Ambassador added that the U.S. was sending substantial helicopter support as well. He said that Germans could be proud of their troops in Afghanistan. Westerwelle responded that this was good news. He said that the London Conference bore an excellent conclusion, and was particularly useful for its focus on civilian progress. He emphasized the importance of underscoring civilian reconstruction. ¶4. (C) With a request for confidentiality, Westerwelle referred to the January 20 "Bild Zeitung" interview with General McChrystal, in which the general is quoted as urging the Germans to take more risks. Westerwelle recounted that he himself had had to answer questions about this article for ten days, explaining that the Germans were not "peace soldiers" while other countries provided the combat troops. He said it was important that German troops not be "relativized" and cast as second-class troops. He observed that Germany had originally deployed 3,500 troops, increased that mandate to 4,500, and was now planning an increase of another 500 plus a reserve. He emphasized that this was a major contribution compared with other European countries. ¶5. (C) The Ambassador noted that he had gained the impression in Afghanistan that police training was more challenging than he had originally understood. Troops were usually required to provide force protection. But German police training was the best. ¶6. (C) The Ambassador asked how the prospective February 26 Bundestag debate to extend the Bundeswehr mandate in Afghanistan would play out. Westerwelle said the question was how large a majority would approve the new mandate. He said that SPD caucus chief Steinmeier displayed good will on this issue. However, SPD chairman Gabriel wanted to politicize the issue for domestic political gain. Nevertheless, he thought some in the SPD would support the new mandate. However, Westerwelle expected no support from the Greens. Westerwelle noted that the May NRW state elections were also affecting the issue in a negative way. That said, he said he could not see Steinmeier opposing the larger mandate. He hoped the Ambassador would speak with Steinmeier. ------ IRAN ------ ¶7. (C) Asked about the February 5 visit of Iranian FM Mottaki to the Munich Security Conference, Westerwelle emphasized that he (Westerwelle) had not invited Mottaki to come to Germany, and Westerwelle had also not requested a meeting with Mottaki. Rather, it was Mottaki who was asking to see Westerwelle. Westerwelle said he had still not decided whether he would talk to Mottaki or not. He reflected concern that Tehran might try to exploit Mottaki's visit to Germany as a distraction, and continue executing people during the visit. In any case, Westerwelle said his position was exactly the same as the U.S. on Iran, and he would share the results of any meeting with Mottaki, if it took place. BERLIN 00000164 002 OF 002 ¶8. (C) Westerwelle said he would meet Russian FM Lavrov and (separately) Chinese FM Yang February 5. He suggested that Moscow had been changing course on Iran sanctions since the Qom revelations. The Russians now saw Iran as playing games on the nuclear issue. However, he observed that China was "hesitant," or even in opposition to sanctions. Reflecting on his recent visit to China, Westerwelle said he had not perceived any "good will" there at present. He said he would ask Yang again about Iran and then share the results with the U.S. Westerwelle opined that it was important also to focus on Brazil as an opinion leader in the Third World. He noted that President Lula had received Ahmadinejad warmly several months ago. He added that he was uncertain what the Saudis thought, but that the other Persian Gulf countries seemed to be in an existential panic about the Iranian nuclear program. ----------- TAC NUKES ----------- ¶9. (C) Touching briefly on arms control, Westerwelle stated unequivocally that tactical nuclear weapons was an issue for NATO. He said that when he had received Kissinger, Schulz, Perry and Nunn on February 3 to talk about their global zero proposal, tactical nuclear weapons was not discussed. He said that the four statesmen were very supportive of President Obama. ---------- TFTP --------- ¶10. (C) The Ambassador raised the challenge of getting the European Parliament to approve an agreement to share data with the U.S. on tracking terrorist finance. The Ambassador noted the extensive efforts of the Treasury Department and other U.S. agencies to explain the importance of the program to our common security. He asked how one could get better support for the program. Westerwelle replied that the German government had been able to come up with a solution for itself a few months ago when the issue first surfaced. (Comment: In fact, German Interior Minister de Maziere's vote to abstain in the EU Council vote on TFTP on November 30 reflected the complete deadlock within the Coalition Government between TFTP advocates in the CDU-controlled Interior Ministry and TFTP opponents in the FDP-controlled Justice Ministery. End Comment.) However, Westerwelle said that now that the issue was in the European Parliament, he had no ability to influence it. He said that he was very, very aware of the Secretary's interest in this issue. Nevertheless, he had a sense that almost all groups in the European Parliament had concerns with the proposed agreement. He emphasized that this was not an issue that only concerned his party, the FDP, but rather many others as well. ¶11. (C) Westerwelle shared that he had not yet appointed a new Coordinator for German-American cooperation. ---------- COMMENT --------- ¶12. (C) Westerwelle (who spoke with ease in English) was in a buoyant mood and more confident on his issues than we have seen him so far. He seemed ready to defend any intimation that he was less than supportive of a troop surge (Defense Minister zu Guttenberg told the Ambassador two days ago that Westerwelle had worked for no increase of German troops for Afghanistan, see Berlin 157) with invocations of the importance of civilian reconstruction. On Iran, he leapt at the chance to tell us he had not invited Mottaki. His dodges on both tactical nuclear weapons and terrorist finance were all but practiced. His comment that he was unable to affect the vote in the EU Parliament on TFTP was a bit disingenuous; on February 4, an MFA official acknowledged to visiting Treasury officials in Berlin that German MEPs were in fact leading the charge against TFTP in the EU Parliament with the tacit support of the FDP, if not of specialists in the Justice Ministry and MFA themselves. Westerwelle still cuts a good image in meetings and in the press here, even though his party continues a bout of free fall in the polls. His ministry, though, still wonders (privately to us) where he gets his policy direction from. END COMMENT. ¶13. (U) The Ambassador did not have the chance to clear this cable before departing Berlin. Murphy
CLICK ON LINE ABOVE – LINIE OBEN “WikiLeaks Response v6” to download – um zu downloaden
In a document titled “The WikiLeaks Threat” three data intelligence companies, Plantir Technologies, HBGary Federal and Berico Technologies, outline a plan to attack Wikileaks. They are acting upon request from Hunton and Williams, a law firm working for Bank of America. The Department of Justice recommended the law firm to Bank of America according to an article in The Tech Herald. The prosed attacks on WikiLeaks according to the slides include these actions:
Feed the fuel between the feuding groups. Disinformation. Create messages around actions of sabotage or discredit the opposing organizations. Submit fake documents and then call out the error.
Create concern over the security of the infrastructure. Create exposure stories. If the process is believed not to be secure they are done.
Cyber attacks against the infrastructure to get data on document submitters. This would kill the project. Since the servers are now in Sweden and France putting a team together to get access is more straightforward.
Media campaign to push the radial and reckless nature of WikiLeaks activities. Sustain pressure. Does nothing for the fanatics, but creates concern and doubt among moderates.
Search for leaks. Use social media to profile and identify risky behavior of employees.
Update: On July 6, 2010, Private Bradley Manning, a 22 year old intelligence analyst with the United States Army in Baghdad, was charged with disclosing this video (after allegedly speaking to an unfaithful journalist). The whistleblower behind the Pentagon Papers, Daniel Ellsberg, has called Mr. Manning a ‘hero’. He is currently imprisoned in Kuwait. The Apache crew and those behind the cover up depicted in the video have yet to be charged. To assist Private Manning, please see bradleymanning.org.
5th April 2010 10:44 EST WikiLeaks has released a classified US military video depicting the indiscriminate slaying of over a dozen people in the Iraqi suburb of New Baghdad — including two Reuters news staff.
Reuters has been trying to obtain the video through the Freedom of Information Act, without success since the time of the attack. The video, shot from an Apache helicopter gun-sight, clearly shows the unprovoked slaying of a wounded Reuters employee and his rescuers. Two young children involved in the rescue were also seriously wounded.
The military did not reveal how the Reuters staff were killed, and stated that they did not know how the children were injured.
After demands by Reuters, the incident was investigated and the U.S. military concluded that the actions of the soldiers were in accordance with the law of armed conflict and its own “Rules of Engagement”.
Consequently, WikiLeaks has released the classified Rules of Engagement for 2006, 2007 and 2008, revealing these rules before, during, and after the killings.
WikiLeaks has released both the original 38 minutes video and a shorter version with an initial analysis. Subtitles have been added to both versions from the radio transmissions.
WikiLeaks obtained this video as well as supporting documents from a number of military whistleblowers. WikiLeaks goes to great lengths to verify the authenticity of the information it receives. We have analyzed the information about this incident from a variety of source material. We have spoken to witnesses and journalists directly involved in the incident.
WikiLeaks wants to ensure that all the leaked information it receives gets the attention it deserves. In this particular case, some of the people killed were journalists that were simply doing their jobs: putting their lives at risk in order to report on war. Iraq is a very dangerous place for journalists: from 2003- 2009, 139 journalists were killed while doing their work.
The military did not reveal how the Reuters staff were killed, and stated that they did not know how the children were injured.
After demands by Reuters, the incident was investigated and the U.S. military concluded that the actions of the soldiers were in accordance with the law of armed conflict and its own “Rules of Engagement”.
Consequently, WikiLeaks has released the classified Rules of Engagement for 2006, 2007 and 2008, revealing these rules before, during, and after the killings.
WikiLeaks has released both the original 38 minutes video and a shorter version with an initial analysis. Subtitles have been added to both versions from the radio transmissions.
WikiLeaks obtained this video as well as supporting documents from a number of military whistleblowers. WikiLeaks goes to great lengths to verify the authenticity of the information it receives. We have analyzed the information about this incident from a variety of source material. We have spoken to witnesses and journalists directly involved in the incident.
WikiLeaks wants to ensure that all the leaked information it receives gets the attention it deserves. In this particular case, some of the people killed were journalists that were simply doing their jobs: putting their lives at risk in order to report on war. Iraq is a very dangerous place for journalists: from 2003- 2009, 139 journalists were killed while doing their work.
siehe: http://www.victims-opfer.com/?p=18646
Gerd Bennewirtz,Peter Ehlers etc, “GoMoPa” – ein Team . die Frage ist nur noch, wer hat die Hosen an
Stimmen Sie ab
a) Peter Ehlers
b) Gerd Bennewirtz
c) Gaby Bennewirtz
d) Klaus Maurischat
e) Jochen Resch
f) Manfred Resch
g) Rainer Zitelmann
h) Jan Mucha
i) Sven Schmidt
j) Thomas Promny
k) Christian Sorger
l) Oberst Ehrenfried Stelzer
| Subject: | Request |
| From: | “P. Schmitz” <p.schmitz@deinguterruf.de> |
| Date: | Fri, July 1, 2011 12:18 pm |
| To: | office@ebizz.tv |
| Priority: | Normal |
| Options: | View Full Header | View Printable Version | Download this as a file |
Dear madams, dear sirs, by order of our customer SJB Fonds Skyline OHG we are kindly asking you to remove some entries on your website thetvnet.com. The topicality and the correctness of these entries are no longer up to date. It is a major concern of our customer to see them removed: immobilien-vertraulich.com/law/7279-die-killer-bibel-toxdat--die-900-seiten-stasi-mordstudie-von-gomopa-mastermind-ehrenfried-stelzer.html immobilien-vertraulich.com/law/7277-sjb-fonds-opfer-sven-babyface-schmidt-als-chef-terrorist-von-europas-gefaehrlichster-internet-kriminellen-bande-enttarnt-.html immobilien-vertraulich.com/law/7268-der-beweis-tatsaechlich-vorbestrafter-serienbetrueger-klausmaurischat-gomopa-hat-eigenes-kinder-portal-.html immobilien-vertraulich.com/law/7264-die-killer-bibel-toxdat--die-900-seiten-stasi-mordstudie-von-gomopa-mastermind-ehrenfried-stelzer.html immobilien-vertraulich.com/law/7262-sjb-fonds-opfer-sven-babyface-schmidt-als-chef-terrorist-von-europas-gefaehrlichster-internet-kriminellen-bande-enttarnt-.html immobilien-vertraulich.com/law/7224-die-killer-bibel-toxdat-die-900-seiten-stasi-mordstudie-von-gomopa-mastermind-ehrenfried-stelzer.html immobilien-vertraulich.com/law/7223-opfer-sven-schmidt-als-chef-terrorist-von-europas-gefaehrlichster-internet-kriminellen-bande-enttarnt.html immobilien-vertraulich.com/law/7217-der-beweis-tatsaechlich-vorbestrafter-serienbetrueger-klausmaurischat-gomopa-hat-eigenes-kinder-portal-.html immobilien-vertraulich.com/law/7212-die-killer-bibel-toxdat-die-900-seiten-stasi-mordstudie-von-gomopa-mastermind-ehrenfried-stelzer.html immobilien-vertraulich.com/law/7210-opfer-sven-schmidt-als-chef-terrorist-von-europas-gefaehrlichster-internet-kriminellen-bande-enttarnt.html immobilien-vertraulich.com/law/7203-der-beweis-tatsaechlich-vorbestrafter-serienbetrueger-klausmaurischat-gomopa-hat-eigenes-kinder-portal-.html immobilien-vertraulich.com/law/7200-opfer-die-killer-bibel-toxdat-die-900-seiten-stasi-mordstudie-von-gomopa-mastermind-ehrenfried-stelzer.html immobilien-vertraulich.com/law/7189-opfer-die-killer-bibel-toxdat--die-900-seiten-stasi-mordstudie-von-gomopa-mastermind-ehrenfried-stelzer.html immobilien-vertraulich.com/law/7120--klaus-maurischats-gomopa-cybermoerder-leichen-und-falschmeldungen-plastern-ihren-weg--nicht-nur-im-internet.html immobilien-vertraulich.com/boerse-ipo-reit/7119--der-mehrfach-vorbestrafte-serienbetrueger-und-mutmassliche-paederast-klaus-maurischat-und-seine-neue-qwirecard-enteq.html We hope you can manage the removal of these entries according to the wish of our customer contemporarily.These entries and similar ones cause major problems for our customer. We wanna thank you for your appreciation, for further information please visit our website deinguterruf.de. (the english version is still under construction). In case you are not the right receipt for this request, it would be very kind if you can name the correct person in charge. If you have further questions concerning this case or our services in general, please contact me. It would be a great pleasure to receive a positive feedback. With kind regards, -- Mit freundlichen Grüßen, P. Schmitz DEIN GUTER RUF.DE Ein Projekt der MoveVision GmbH Alfredstraße 341 45133 ESSEN Tel: 0201-2489452 E-mail: p.schmitz (at) deinguterruf.de MoveVision – GmbH - HRB 22121 Geschäftsführer: Martin Lux - Steuernummer: DE228746207 INTERESSANT - BENEWIRTZ WOLLTE HIERMIT AUSSCHLIESSLICH "GoMoPa
Liebe Leser,
offensichtlich haben unsere hochbezahlten Anwälte in Kalifornien wieder eine Indexierung dieser Site http://www.berndpulch.org erreicht.
Ich bedanke mich.
Das bestärkt uns in unserem Kampf für die “GoMoPa”-Opfer”, die sicher nicht diese Möglichkeiten haben.
GoMoPa-Opfer können mich jederzeit in meinem Londoner Büro oder unter bernd@ebizz.tv erreichen
Gemeinsam sind wir noch stärker und kämpfen für eine bessere Zukunft !
Enjoy !
Herzlichst Ihr
Magister Bernd Pulch

ARND HALLER “GOOGLE”-”GoMoPa”-STASI-Opfer haben bei ihm keine Chance – Ein Mann ohne Moral, sagen viele betroffene Opfer
mehr unter
| Subject: | Request |
| From: | “P. Schmitz” <p.schmitz@deinguterruf.de> |
| Date: | Fri, July 1, 2011 12:18 pm |
| To: | office@ebizz.tv |
| Priority: | Normal |
| Options: | View Full Header | View Printable Version | Download this as a file |
Dear madams, dear sirs, by order of our customer SJB Fonds Skyline OHG we are kindly asking you to remove some entries on your website thetvnet.com. The topicality and the correctness of these entries are no longer up to date. It is a major concern of our customer to see them removed: immobilien-vertraulich.com/law/7279-die-killer-bibel-toxdat--die-900-seiten-stasi-mordstudie-von-gomopa-mastermind-ehrenfried-stelzer.html immobilien-vertraulich.com/law/7277-sjb-fonds-opfer-sven-babyface-schmidt-als-chef-terrorist-von-europas-gefaehrlichster-internet-kriminellen-bande-enttarnt-.html immobilien-vertraulich.com/law/7268-der-beweis-tatsaechlich-vorbestrafter-serienbetrueger-klausmaurischat-gomopa-hat-eigenes-kinder-portal-.html immobilien-vertraulich.com/law/7264-die-killer-bibel-toxdat--die-900-seiten-stasi-mordstudie-von-gomopa-mastermind-ehrenfried-stelzer.html immobilien-vertraulich.com/law/7262-sjb-fonds-opfer-sven-babyface-schmidt-als-chef-terrorist-von-europas-gefaehrlichster-internet-kriminellen-bande-enttarnt-.html immobilien-vertraulich.com/law/7224-die-killer-bibel-toxdat-die-900-seiten-stasi-mordstudie-von-gomopa-mastermind-ehrenfried-stelzer.html immobilien-vertraulich.com/law/7223-opfer-sven-schmidt-als-chef-terrorist-von-europas-gefaehrlichster-internet-kriminellen-bande-enttarnt.html immobilien-vertraulich.com/law/7217-der-beweis-tatsaechlich-vorbestrafter-serienbetrueger-klausmaurischat-gomopa-hat-eigenes-kinder-portal-.html immobilien-vertraulich.com/law/7212-die-killer-bibel-toxdat-die-900-seiten-stasi-mordstudie-von-gomopa-mastermind-ehrenfried-stelzer.html immobilien-vertraulich.com/law/7210-opfer-sven-schmidt-als-chef-terrorist-von-europas-gefaehrlichster-internet-kriminellen-bande-enttarnt.html immobilien-vertraulich.com/law/7203-der-beweis-tatsaechlich-vorbestrafter-serienbetrueger-klausmaurischat-gomopa-hat-eigenes-kinder-portal-.html immobilien-vertraulich.com/law/7200-opfer-die-killer-bibel-toxdat-die-900-seiten-stasi-mordstudie-von-gomopa-mastermind-ehrenfried-stelzer.html immobilien-vertraulich.com/law/7189-opfer-die-killer-bibel-toxdat--die-900-seiten-stasi-mordstudie-von-gomopa-mastermind-ehrenfried-stelzer.html immobilien-vertraulich.com/law/7120--klaus-maurischats-gomopa-cybermoerder-leichen-und-falschmeldungen-plastern-ihren-weg--nicht-nur-im-internet.html immobilien-vertraulich.com/boerse-ipo-reit/7119--der-mehrfach-vorbestrafte-serienbetrueger-und-mutmassliche-paederast-klaus-maurischat-und-seine-neue-qwirecard-enteq.html We hope you can manage the removal of these entries according to the wish of our customer contemporarily.These entries and similar ones cause major problems for our customer. We wanna thank you for your appreciation, for further information please visit our website deinguterruf.de. (the english version is still under construction). In case you are not the right receipt for this request, it would be very kind if you can name the correct person in charge. If you have further questions concerning this case or our services in general, please contact me. It would be a great pleasure to receive a positive feedback. With kind regards, -- Mit freundlichen Grüßen, P. Schmitz DEIN GUTER RUF.DE Ein Projekt der MoveVision GmbH Alfredstraße 341 45133 ESSEN Tel: 0201-2489452 E-mail: p.schmitz (at) deinguterruf.de MoveVision – GmbH - HRB 22121 Geschäftsführer: Martin Lux - Steuernummer: DE228746207 INTERESSANT - BENEWIRTZ WOLLTE HIERMIT AUSSCHLIESSLICH "GoMoPa"-KRITISCHE ARTIKEL LÖSCHEN UND KEINE KRITISCHEN ARTIKEL ÜBER SJB
Liebe Leser,
nachfolgend ein Gast-Kommentar von meinem Journalisten-Kollegen und ebenfalls “GoMoPa”-STASI-Stalking-Opfer Martin Sachs:
Liebe Leserin, lieber Leser!
Stellen Sie sich bitte kurz vor, dass Sie mit einer tollen Geschäftsidee oder einer Geschäftserweiterung zu mehr Geld kommen möchten. Beispielsweise auch Ihr Unternehmen vergrössern oder gar Ihre Waren exportieren wollen.
Sie werben damit natürlich über die Medien….
Da meldet sich bei Ihnen möglicherweise ein Beauftragter des Finanz-Nachrichtendienstes GoMoPa mit der Mitteilung, dass im GoMoPa-Forum sehr negative Forenbeiträge über Ihre Person oder Ihr Vorhaben stünden. Äusserst Schlimmes wir über Sie berichtet. Zum Beispiel, dass Sie bisher schon Ihr Geld mit betrügerischen Machenschaften verdient hätten oder Ihr Sohn als erfolgreicher Sportler nach neuesten Ermittlungen in einem Kokain-Dealer-Ring verwickelt sei.
Ein anonymer User ( Schreiberling) habe dies geschrieben, wird vom GoMoPa-Beauftragten berichtet. Man könne jetzt noch nicht feststellen, ob dies so wahr sei. Man könne aber auch nicht den Beitrag einfach rausnehmen, denn es könne ja auch was Wahres daran sein!
Falls Sie selbst an der Wahrheitsfindung interessiert seien, könnten Sie auch beim ´seriösen Nachrichtendienst` GoMoPa als Gesellschafter oder als Premium-Mitglied einsteigen, dann könne man ja…..usf. …ganz einfach den Beitrag herausnehmen!
So ähnlich könnte es geschehen und glauben Sie mir: ´Dies ist kein böser Traum,-keine Fata Morgana`, sondern schon Zigtausendmal in der fast 10-Jährigen GoMoPa- Geschichte so abgelaufen.
Wir, von der CSA-Agency, wurden selbst aus Wettbewerbsgründen seit 2002 von GoMoPa auf primitivste Weise im Forum diffamiert oder die von uns als seriöse Dienstleister empfohlenen Unternehmungen wurden per Rufmord mit schmutzigsten, unwahren Verleumdungs-Attacken von anonymen Bloggern ( bezahlte Helfershelfer vom GoMoPa) nahezu ruiniert. Nicht nur finanziell , sondern auch gesundheitlich nieder gemacht! Nicht umsonst heisst es RUFMORD.
Der Begriff ´Stalking` ist da noch eine vornehme Bezeichnung.
Auf gut deutsch passt Rufmord besser.
Geschäftlicher und gesundheitlicher RUFMORD gehört auch entsprechend bestraft.
Die Justiz tut sich sehr schwer damit. Vor allem, wenn die Rufmörder mit Ihren Machenschaften mit Gesellschaften wie z.B. ´GoMoPa` als Briefkastenfirma aus dem Ausland agieren. UND zum anderen, weil sich die Stalking-Terror-Experten von GoMoPa sich mit ihren Methoden auch der Justiz und der Medien bedienen.
Die seriöse Alternative zu systematischem Rufmord
Seriöse Aufklärung hilft!Auch der zuweilen personell überforderten Justiz kann mit entsprechender Aufklärung zum Hintergrund der Go-Mafia ´GoMoPa` und ihrem Paten Klaus Maurischat geholfen werden!
Bitte, Freunde der Gerechtigkeit, helft mit, dem grausigen ´GoMoPa-Rufmord-Terror ein baldiges Ende zu bereiten!
Unterstützt die ´BAG-Illus, den BUND anonyme Gerechtigkeit`
Schaut Euch die Rufmord-Methoden der GoMoPa-Mafia mit ihrem Paten Klaus Maurischat an. Hier zur BAG-Website www.123bagillus.com
Hier zu den aktuell aufgeführten Rufmord-Beispielen http://tinyurl.com/6h5zttc
Hier der Link zum BAG-Blog http://123bagillus.wordpress.com/
Ihr CSA-Agency-Aufklärer Martin Sachs
Der mehrfach vorbestrafte Serienbetrüger Klaus Maurischat („GoMoPa“) hat ein eigenes Portal nur für Kinder und deren „Sexualerziehung“. Dies haben der Informationsdienst Tip-Talk und die Anleger-Opfer von http://www.sjb-fonds-opfer.com enthüllt: http://www.gomopa4kids.net.
Hier werden User von dem mehrfach vorbestraften Betrüger (AZ: 28 Ls 85/05) darüber aufgeklärt, was es mit der „Selbstbefriedigung“ und anderen Sexualpraktiken angeblich auf sich hat: „Wahr oder falsch: Gerüchte über Selbstbefriedigung! „
TipTalk kommentiert: „Wenn Sie Ihre Kinder nicht selbst aufklären können oder wollen, sollten Sie das getrost Gomopa überlassen.
Über Selbstbefriedigung erzählt man sich immer noch verrückte Geschichten. Wir sagen dir was stimmt und was voll
gelogen ist!
http://www.gomopa4kids.net kümmert sich gern um Ihren Nachwuchs.
http://www.gomopa4kids.net/Forum/liebe-sex-und-beziehungen/wahr-oder-falsch-geruechte-ueber-selbstbefriedigung-
p232.html#post232.“
Unsere Presseanfrage zu dem heiklen Thema beantworte der vorbestrafte Betrüger erst gar nicht, sondern schickte einen Herren „Siegfried Siewert“ vor, der versuchte mit Droh-Telefonaten
und Droh-E-Mails das Erscheinen der brisanten Informationen zu verhindern.
Siehe auch
http://sjb-fonds-opfer.com/?p=11490
Pikant dabei: „Siegfied Siewert“ ist wie viele „GoMoPa“-Kenner wissen, ein selbstgewähltes Pseudonym für Klaus Maurischat.
Und: Die „GoMoPa“-Kinder-Webseite wird genau da gehostet, wo auch Maurischats GoMoPa-Webpage sowie zahlreiche ihm zugerechnete Cyberstalking-Erpresserseiten gehostet werden (siehe die Verbindungsdaten im nachfolgenden Text).
Erstaunlich ist auch, das Maurischat seinen zahlreichen Cyberstalking-Opfern immer wieder Sexualdelikte mit Kindern vorgeworfen hat – an diesen anoynmen Vorwürfen war natürlich in keinem Fall irgendetwas wahr.
Nachdem seine gegen unseren Co-Herausgeber Magister Bernd Pulch und zahlreiche anderen Opfer gerichteten Verleumdungsseiten nicht mehr von Google indexiert werden, da sie klarerweise gegen geltendes Recht verstossen und seine Denial of Service-Atatcken gegen uns gescheitert sind, bleiben Maurischat jetzt nur noch telefonische Drohanrufe und Verleumdungen auf seiner eigenen Webseite.
Magister Bernd Pulch: „Was für ein glänzender Un-Journalist der vorbestrafte Maurischat ist, kann man schon daran erkennen, dass er es erst heute geschafft hat, meine akademische Ausbildung und den rechtmässigen Erwerb meines Titels Magisters zu verifizieren. Das kann jedoch schon jeder Praktikant sofort nachvollziehen. Komplexere Sachverhalte übersteigen mit Sicherheit das Begriffsvermögen des tatsächlich vorbestraften Betrügers. Wir müssen ihm wohl einige Jahre Zeit lassen bis er erkennt, das niemand seine neuen Verleumdungen mehr glauben kann – wie der tatsächlich vorbestrafte Betrüger selber am Besten weiss!”
Im Übrigen stehen wir für weitere Rückfragen jederzeit in unserem Londoner Büro zur Verfügung oder auch per E-Mail zur Verfügung.“
Hintergrund:
Die Verbindungsdaten der Kinder-Webseite:
Website Title:
Startseite – GoMoPa4Kids
Website Description:
GoMoPa4Kids, d Forum für Kinder und Jugendliche – Hilfe, Informationen, Tipps, Ratschläge, Erkenntnisse
Website Keywords:
GoMoPa, Jugendschutz, GoMoPa4Kids, GoMoPa 4 Kids, GoMoPa 4Kids, Goldman, Morgenstern, Partners, Goldman Morgenstern & Partners, Jugendliche, Kinder, Information, Abzocke, Abos, Betrug, Betrugspräventation, Kids, s, Information, Hilfe, Schutz, Netzwerk, Jamba, Zed, Usenext, FirstLoad, 99 s, Open Verbraucherschutz, Jugendschutz, Datenbank, Urteile, Recht, Jurist, Spiele, s, RPG. WOW, World of Warcraft, Trading Card, Jamba, Abzocke, Betrug, Liebe, Beruf, Karriere, Chancen, Beratung, Mac, Windows, Linux
Daily Visits:
37 (estimated)
Daily Pageviews:
66 (1.80 per visitor) (estimated)
Alexa Rank:
6,229,445 visit alexa
Alexa Reach:
1.4E-5% (Percent of global Internet users)
Alexa BackLinks:
2
Server IP:
67.23.163.246
Server Location:
Lockport
NY
14094
United States
Domain Name: GOMOPA4KIDS.NET
Registrar: GODADDY.COM, INC.
Whois Server: whois.godaddy.com
Referral URL: http://registrar.godaddy.com
Name Server: NS57.DOMAINCONTROL.COM
Name Server: NS58.DOMAINCONTROL.COM
Status: clientDeleteProhibited
Status: clientRenewProhibited
Status: clientTransferProhibited
Status: clientUpdateProhibited
Updated Date: 17-sep-2009
Creation Date: 02-jul-2009
Expiration Date: 02-jul-2011
Laut den SJB-Opfern haben der „Finanzdienst-Nachrichtendienst Gomopa” unter der Führung des wegen Betrugs vorbestraften Betrügers Klaus Maurischat ( Aktenzeichen Krefeld vom 24. April 2006; AZ: 28 Ls 85/05 – Am 24. April 2006 war die Verhandlung am Amtsgericht Krefeld in der Betrugssache: Mark Vornkahl / Klaus Maurischat ./. Dehnfeld. Aktenzeichen: 28 Ls 85/05, Klaus Maurischat, Lange Straße 38, 27313 Dörverden) sowie der umstrittene Fondsvermittler SJB gemeinsame, illegale Aktivitäten begangen.
Cyber-Kriminelle am Werk
So wurden auf die Internet-Seiten http://www.sjb-fonds-opfer.com und http://www.bennewirtz-opfer.com wochenlang schwere Hackerangriffe vorgenommen. Einmal im Wege des „ordinären Hackens“ mit Hunderten von chinesischen IPs, die dem mutmasslichen Hackerpaar Thomas Promny., Hamburg, und Sabine Müller. Weimar, (Aktenzeichen Hamburg 035/1K/608828/2010 und ST 1044410/2010 zuzuordnen seien.
Schwerwiegender waren indes sogennante Flooding-Angriffe, bei denen durch fingierte Anfragen die Server zum Absturz gebracht werden.Maurischat, gegen den in vielen Verfahren u.a. wegen Kursmanipultion im Falle Wirecard ermittlt wird, gilt als „praktizierender Experte auf diesem Sektor“, so die SJB-Opfer. Zahlreiche Verbindungsdaten zu den Registraren Arvixe und Lin Hostern Versatel und Godaddy konnten sichergestellt werden. Seitens der SJB-Opfer wurden und werden diese Angriffe von Gerd Bennewirtz, der selber Registrar und Server-Hoster ist angeordnet. Die ausführenden Parteien seien entweder Promny und Müller oder Klaus Maurischat gewesen.
Sjb Title: SJB FondsSkyline OHG 1989 | Gewinner bleiben
Sjb IP:
80.237.237.212
Sjb server location:
Korschenbroich in Germany
Sjb ISP:
Host Europe GmbH
ype: PERSON
Name: Gerd Bennewirtz
Address: Mediainvest Fonds-System-Software
Address: Bachstr.45c
PostalCode: 41352
City: Korschenbroich
CountryCode: DE
Phone: +49 2182 8520
Fax: +49 2182 8558141
Email:
Drehscheibe Godday
Godaddy ist auch der Haus-Hoster von „Gomopa“ und seit vielen Jahren der Registrar der „Gomopa“-Homepage. Hier werden auch zahlreiche „Gomopa“ zuzuordnende „Foren“ und „Blogs“ zugeordnet, in denen fiktive Cyber-Aliasse ihr Unwesen treiben, das natürlich nie mit Fakten belegt ist wie z.b. extremnews.com.
Registrant:
Goldman Morgenstern an Partners LLC
Registered through: GoDaddy.com, Inc. (http://www.godaddy.com)
Domain Name: GOMOPA.NET
Gehostet hier:
Server IP: 67.23.163.233
Server Location:
Lockport, NY, 14094, United States
Gomopa IP:
67.23.163.230
Gomopa server location:
Asheville in United States
Gomopa ISP:
Netriplex LLC
Pikant auch die Internetseite der immer wieder mit Gomopa in Verbindung gebrachten Offshore-Firma Baker & Baker, Köln, wird bei Godaddy gehostet.
Server IP: 208.109.181.34
Server Location:
Scottsdale, AZ, 85260, United States
Von gekaperten Godaddy-IP-Adressen wurden und werden auch zahlreiche Flooding-Angriffe geführt bzw. sogenannte Stalking-Seiten gehostet, die so die Opfer eine Spezialität von Klaus Maurischat seien.
Die Baker & Baker wurde bereits in der Schweiz wegen Vermögenslosigkeit liquidiert.
Siehe http://www.yasni.de/baker+offshore/person+information und
http://www.moneyhouse.ch/en/u/baker_baker_consulting_group_ag_CH-170.3.014.447-7.htm
Dieser Firma war Heinz Gerlach ein besonderes Dorn im Auge wie man bei Durchsicht der Seite http://www.akte-heinz-gerlach.info unschwer erkennen kann. Es geht und ging dabei um die Patenschaft im grauen Markt der Kapitalanlagen.
Drehsscheibe Mediaon.com
Eine wesentliche Rolle bei den illegalen Offshore-Internet-Aktivitäten der Cyber-Kriminellen spielt auch die Briefkastenfirma Linh Wang, Honkong, bei der die Seite http://www.akte-heinz-gerlach.info registriert wurde, die bei dem dubiosen Undergrund-Unternehmen Mediaon.com in der Türkei gehostet wird, so die Opfer. Über diese Schiene wurden Dutzende betrügerischer Erpresser-Sites der Cyber-Kriminellen registriert.
Server IP: 95.0.239.251)
Domain ID:D28959891-LRMS
Domain Name:AKTE-HEINZ-GERLACH.INFO
Created On:03-Jul-2009 08:59:55 UTC
Last Updated On:10-May-2010 18:16:59 UTC
Expiration Date:03-Jul-2011 08:59:55 UTC
Sponsoring Registrar:Alantron BLTD (R322-LRMS)
Status:OK
Registrant ID:DI_11637039
Registrant Name:Linh Wang
Registrant Organization:Linh Wang1273487281
Registrant Street1:3617 Tower 1 Lippo Centre
Registrant Street2:
Registrant Street3:
Registrant City:Hong Kong
Registrant State/Province:Queensway
Registrant Postal Code:0000089
Registrant Country:HK
Registrant Phone:+000.5230064510
Registrant Phone Ext.:
Registrant FAX:+000.5230064510
Registrant FAX Ext.:
Registrant Email: // <![CDATA[// <![CDATA[
var prefix = 'ma' + 'il' + 'to';
var path = 'hr' + 'ef' + '=';
var addy17295 = 'info' + '@';
addy17295 = addy17295 + 'xchiang' + '.' + 'com';
document.write( '‘ );
document.write( addy17295 );
document.write( ” );
//\n
// –>]]>info@xchiang.com// <![CDATA[// Diese E-Mail-Adresse ist gegen Spambots geschützt! Sie müssen JavaScript aktivieren, damit Sie sie sehen können. // <![CDATA[// <![CDATA[
document.write( '’ );
// ]]>
Admin ID:DI_11637039
Admin Name:Linh Wang
Admin Organization:Linh Wang1273487281
Admin Street1:3617 Tower 1 Lippo Centre
Admin Street2:
Admin Street3:
Admin City:Hong Kong
Admin State/Province:Queensway
Admin Postal Code:0000089
Admin Country:HK
Admin Phone:+000.5230064510
Admin Phone Ext.:
Admin FAX:+000.5230064510
Admin FAX Ext.:
Admin Email: // <![CDATA[// <![CDATA[
var prefix = 'ma' + 'il' + 'to';
var path = 'hr' + 'ef' + '=';
var addy37117 = 'info' + '@';
addy37117 = addy37117 + 'xchiang' + '.' + 'com';
document.write( '‘ );
document.write( addy37117 );
document.write( ” );
//\n
// –>]]>info@xchiang.com// <![CDATA[// Diese E-Mail-Adresse ist gegen Spambots geschützt! Sie müssen JavaScript aktivieren, damit Sie sie sehen können. // <![CDATA[// <![CDATA[
document.write( '’ );
// ]]>
Billing ID:DI_11637040
Billing Name:Tuce Kuyumcu
Billing Organization:Tuce Kuyumcu1273487281
Billing Street1:Market Street 45a
Billing Street2:
Billing Street3:
Billing City:Baidoa
Billing State/Province:Victoria Mahe Seychelles
Billing Postal Code:00000
Billing Country:HK
Billing Phone:+000.4834433490
Billing Phone Ext.:
Billing FAX:+000.4834433491
Billing FAX Ext.:
Billing Email: // <![CDATA[// <![CDATA[
var prefix = 'ma' + 'il' + 'to';
var path = 'hr' + 'ef' + '=';
var addy10877 = 'tuce.kuyumcu' + '@';
addy10877 = addy10877 + 'somali' + '.' + 'com';
document.write( '‘ );
document.write( addy10877 );
document.write( ” );
//\n
// –>]]>tuce.kuyumcu@somali.com// <![CDATA[// Diese E-Mail-Adresse ist gegen Spambots geschützt! Sie müssen JavaScript aktivieren, damit Sie sie sehen können. // <![CDATA[// <![CDATA[
document.write( '’ );
// ]]>
Tech ID:DI_11637040
Tech Name:Tuce Kuyumcu
Tech Organization:Tuce Kuyumcu1273487281
Tech Street1:Market Street 45a
Tech Street2:
Tech Street3:
Tech City:Baidoa
Tech State/Province:Victoria Mahe Seychelles
Tech Postal Code:00000
Tech Country:HK
Tech Phone:+000.4834433490
Tech Phone Ext.:
Tech FAX:+000.4834433491
Tech FAX Ext.:
Tech Email: // <![CDATA[// <![CDATA[
var prefix = 'ma' + 'il' + 'to';
var path = 'hr' + 'ef' + '=';
var addy26790 = 'tuce.kuyumcu' + '@';
addy26790 = addy26790 + 'somali' + '.' + 'com';
document.write( '‘ );
document.write( addy26790 );
document.write( ” );
//\n
// –>]]>tuce.kuyumcu@somali.com// <![CDATA[// Diese E-Mail-Adresse ist gegen Spambots geschützt! Sie müssen JavaScript aktivieren, damit Sie sie sehen können. // <![CDATA[// <![CDATA[
document.write( '’ );
// ]]>
Name Server:NS1.ANADOLUDNS.COM
Name Server:NS2.ANADOLUDNS.COM
Hier der Beleg über das Hosting der Anti-Gerlach-Seite, AKTE-HEINZ-GERLACH.INFO, bei dem Untergrund-Unternehmen Mediaon.com in der Türkei gehostet: Linh Wang
Domain ID:D28959891-LRMS
Domain Name:AKTE-HEINZ-GERLACH.INFO
Created On:03-Jul-2009 08:59:55 UTC
Last Updated On:10-May-2010 18:16:59 UTC
Expiration Date:03-Jul-2011 08:59:55 UTC
Sponsoring Registrar:Alantron BLTD (R32
Mediaon Title: Anonymous Hosting – Privacy Hosting – MediaOn.com is leading the marked in privacy hosting.
Mediaon Keywords: Anonymous hosting, Whois Protection, Whois privacy services, Privacy Hosting, anonymous domain registration, managed vps
Mediaon Description: MediaOn.com is leading in anonymous hosting and privacy hosting.
Mediaon IP:
95.0.153.245
Mediaon server location:
Turkey
Mediaon ISP:
Turk Telekom
IP: 95.0.153.245
IP Country: Turkey
This IP address resolves to dsl95-0-39413.ttnet.net.tr
Idari Yonetici / Registrant
(Admin)
Ad / Name Tekin Karaboga
Adres Catalca Yolu Menekse Mevkii Istanbul 34537
Tel +90.212.8656520
Diese Internet-Operations-Muster – so die SJB-Opfer – habe es in Ihrem Falle, aber auch bei zahlreichen anderen Betrugs-, Erpressungs- und Verleumdungsopfer in den letzten Jahren gegeben. “Nunmeh rliegen die Daten offen und die Hintermänner der feigen Cyber-Rufmorde und auch des heimtückischen Cyber-Mordes an Heinz Gerlachkönnen ermittelt werden”, so Heinz. F., Mayen, Sprecher der Opfer (die Personen-Daten wurden aus Sicherheitsgründen anonimysiert).
Wenn das BKA, LK, FBI und die Kriminalpolizei diesen Spuren weiter intensiv nachgehen würden, seien die sowieso laufenden Ermittlungen in zahlreichen Fällen wie auch im Kursmanipulationsfall „Wirecard“ von Erfolg gekrönt. Denn große Firmen wie Godaddy und auch Enom, für die der Reseller Arvixe Domains verkauft, könnten sich anders als “dubiose türkische Untergrund-Internet-Klitschen” – dem Zugriff der Justiz nicht entziehen.
Ein kleines Schmankerl am Schluss: Pikant ist und bezeichnet für die Glaubwürdigkeit der Aktiviäten des – im Gegensatz zu seinen Opfern – TATSÄCHLICH vorbestraften Klaus Maurischat ( Aktenzeichen Krefeld vom 24. April 2006; AZ: 28 Ls 85/05) ist übrigens auch, das bei dem internationalen „angeblich jüdischen New Yorker“ Unternehmen „Gomopa“ nur deutsche Texte auf der Webseite stehen und über 90% der Besucher aus Deutschland (87,4%), Österreich 4,2 % und Schweiz 1,6%) stammen.
Die Cybermord-Opfer Lothar Berresheim, Dipl.-Ing. Paul Bösel, Andreas Decker, Herbert Ernst, Meridian Capital, Bernd Pulch und Martin Sachs, klären über den kriminellen und serienmässig vorbestraften Ex-Gefängnissinsassen Klaus-Dieter Maurischat (Photo) AZ: 28 Ls 85/05, Aktenzeichen Hamburg 035/1K/608828/2010, KRIPO Wiesbaden (ST 1044410/2010) und seine GoMoPa-Erpresserbande und deren Helfershelfer auf. Deren verbrecherische Aktivitäten haben den Herz-Tod des Anlegerschützers Heinz Gerlach durch eine infame Rufmord-Kampagne herbeigeführt. Zwei weitere Journalisten wurden erst kürzlich mit Herzversagen in Krankenhäuser eingeliefert werden.
Nachfolgend publizieren wir eine Pressemelung eines Anti-Stalking-Aktivisten: Vor Jahren noch undenkbar und von Google bestimmt nicht geplant – aber nicht verhindert
– Cyber Stalking.
Eine neue Form der Kriminalität – eine günstige Plattform für jeden, sich als Stalker,
Rufschädiger oder Erpresser zu betätigen. Man nehme einen ausländischen Web Provider,
eine anonyme Adresse, einen falschen Namen und eine gehörige Portion an kriminelle
Energie sowie einen zur Beihilfe gewillten Webdesigner und schon ist die Cyber Stalker
Plattform erstellt.
„Rotten Neighbours“ hat es uns schon gezeigt: Mit Hilfe von Google werden den Cyber
Verbrechern aus den hintersten Höfen Zugang zum World Wide Web und einer
Öffentlichkeit gegeben, was früher nur großen Medienvertretern vorbehalten war.
Pressegesetze werden ignoriert, Menschenrechte werden so behandelt, als es sie gar nicht
gäbe.Mit schon geringem Aufwand können Existenzen und Personen zerstört werden. Kredit
Ratings werden eliminiert, das soziale Umfeld des Betroffenen wird belastet. Das Opfer wird
als pädophiler und korrupter Krimineller geoutet. Es bleibt immer etwas hängen. Völlig
unbescholtene Personen lesen Dinge über einen, die frei erfunden, diffamieren und
ehrverletzen sind. Wie krank muss jemand sein, der sich dieser Aufgabe, andere öffentlich
an den Pranger zu stellen, bedient und die sozialen und wirtschaftlichen Gefahren denen sie
bewusst die ausgesuchten Personen aussetzten, billigend in Kauf nimmt.
Der angeblich aus den USA tätige, aber hinter deutschen Gardinen betreibende dubiose und
selbsternannte Finanznachrichtendienst Goldmann, Morgenstern & Partner LLC, New York
kurz GoMoPa ist ein solcher Cyber Service. Selbst aber sind die Cyber Personen Maurischat (Bild)
und Vornkahl schon öfters mit dem Gesetz in Konflikt geraten. Eine letzte Straf-Verurteilung
gemäß Anklageschrift der Staatsanwaltschaft Krefeld/ Aktenzeichen Krefeld vom 24. April
2006; AZ: 28 Ls 85/05 – erfolgte am 24. April 2006, Amtsgericht Krefeld in der Betrugssache:
Mark Vornkahl / Klaus Maurischat./. Dehnfeld.
Neuster Coup der GoMoPa Mannschaft: Das“ Rating von Emittenten“ und deren Personendahinter sein. Vielleicht sollten die GoMoPa Macher erst mal bei sich selbst anfangen, bevor sich die Maurischat Truppe erhebt über andere Personen zu urteilen.
Doch wer über andere richten will muss sorgfältig recherchieren und vor allem seriös sein:
Falschmeldungen häufen sich bei Gomopa : http://www.handelsblatt.com/finanzen/aktien-im-fokus/wirecard-kurssturz-…
Das Handelblatt zitiert : Mark Vornkahl, einer der Gründer von Gomopa wies den Vorwurf der Kursmanipulation gestern zurück. Man wolle nur die Wahrheit aufdecken. Es ist allerdings nicht das erste Mal, dass Gomopa-Vertreter ins Zwielicht geraten. 2006 wurden Vornkahl und Mitgründer Klaus Maurischat wegen Betrugs an einem Anleger verurteilt.Maurischat gab gestern gegenüber dem Handelsblatt weitere Verurteilungen zu. Es habe sich dabei jedoch nicht um Anlagebetrug gehandelt.
Weitere Falschmeldungen wurden bei Gomopa.net von der Firma Immovation aus Kassel gerichtlich untersagt: Kein Einzelfall. http://www.presseanzeiger.de/meldungen/handel-wirtschaft/379769.php
Mehr dazu unter: Homepage der IMMOVATION AG: http://www.immovation-ag.de.
Conclusio:
Nach Auffassung des Unterzeichners handelt es sich bei dem vorliegenden Sachverhalt um
den Klassiker des Cyber Crime Zeitalters. Es sind tatsächlich nach unser Auffassung, ein oder mehrere neue Straftatbestände, die durch entsprechende, vorsätzliche Nutzung des Mediums Internet durch den oder die Täter erst ermöglicht werden und den es durch die Politiker mit Eingabe von Motiven zeitnah zur Vorlage beim Bundestag zu bringen gilt. Die Straftatbestände sind alle übergreifend und stellen sich aus diversen Vergehen zusammen.
Die Taten erfolgen unter Ausnutzung der bestehenden Internetstrukturen, wie Domainverwalter, dedicated managen Host-Provider, Suchmaschinen mit ihrer speziellen
Speicherfunktion, hier besonders zu erwähnen die Software der Suchmaschinen-Spider, die durch bestimmte mathematische Algorithmen funktionieren. Die jeweils vom Täter genutzten „Vertriebswege“, hier eben die Provider und Suchmaschinen, die sich zwar vertraglich an den Täter binden müssen, jedoch trotzdem dem Täter eine umfassende Anonymität gewährleisten, machen sich dabei zumindest unter strafrechtlichen Gesichtspunkten der Gehilfenschaft schuldig. Dies jedenfalls ab Kenntnisnahme von den zugrundeliegenden Rechtverletzungen, die durch ihre Dienstleistung erst ermöglicht werden. Diese Gesellschaften, die diese Dienstleistungen anbieten, werden in der Regel erst nach Erlangung entsprechender gerichtlicher Beschlüsse
und Urteile tätig und haben rein kommerzielles Interesse an der Verbreitung und Sicherung/Speicherung der rechtswidrigen Inhalte. Die obige Skizze erläutert, dass der/ die Täter aus der Anonymität heraus agieren können, das jeweilige Opfer jedoch für jedermann (weltweit) namentlich genannt, möglicherweise sogar durch Fotos abgebildet und damit erkennbar gemacht wird, Macht und Kontrolle ausüben kann und sich hierfür der speziellen Struktur des Internets bedient. Der Täter bedient sich absichtlich Diensteistern, wie Servern, die im entfernten Ausland sitzen u.a. Server in Pnom Penh, Türkei oder USA), wissend, dass das Opfer hier keinerlei Chance hat, zeitnah oder überhaupt erfolgreich einzugreifen.
Dem Opfer hingegen bleibt es verwehrt, sich gegen derartige Angriffe erfolgreich zur Wehr zu setzen, jedenfalls, was die hier nötige Geschwindigkeit der Reaktion (sofortiges Abschalten der das Opfer schädigenden Domains) angeht. Das Opfer (Person oder Firma oder beides) ist allein darauf angewiesen, gerichtliche Hilfe in Anspruch zu nehmen. Es ist daher zunächst ohnmächtig, wird kontrolliert und bedroht und erleidet materielle und immaterielle Schäden, die möglicherweise irreparable sind. Somit wird das Opfer in der Regel den Zahlungsbegehren der Täten nachkommen, und hofft, dass damit der „Spuk“ ein Ende hat. Auch versicherungstechnisch ist dieser Straftatbestand ein Novum. Der Unterzeichner, recherchierte seit Jahren bei Opfern, deren Familienmitgliedern,
Mitarbeiter und Berater der gestalkten Gesellschaften, denen genau das oben beschriebene in härtstester Form geschehen ist. Tätergruppe waren in jüngster Zeit Personen mit und um Klaus M. und GoMoPa.
Ein betroffener Kaufmann aus Kassel erklärt: „Die Behörden sind teilweise machtlos, zu viel ist die Flut der Prozesse wegen Beleidigungen und Bedrohungen. Sie geben auf, weil der Tatort Internet noch zu wenig Sicherheit für eine Verurteilung bietet. Die Flut der Anzeigen häufen sich und die Aktivitäten werden offiziell vom Ausland aus geführt. Damit rechnet die Cyber Bande, das die Behörden maßlos überlastet sind. In Realität kann es
ihr Nachbar sein, der einen PC bedienen kann. Nach einigen Recherchen verweisen die Behörden fast alle generell auf den Privatklageweg.“ Verständlich, was aber, wenn die Schmähseiten zur Erpressung von Geld dienen?
„Geld oder Löschung des Eintrages oder der Seite“?
Gegen den einschlägig vorbestraften GoMoPa Macher Klaus M., war schon in anderer, aber ähnlicher Sache mehrfach ermittelt worden. Der Ausgang der sicherlich langwierigen Verfahren bleibt aber immer abzuwarten. Mit Glück werden auch diese Verfahren wieder gegen GoMoPa und Co eingestellt. Vom Opfer folgt eine lange Zeit der Richtigstellung von Personen und Kredibilität auf Seiten der Opfer. Das soziale Umfeld des oder der Betroffenen wird ganz erheblich beeinflusst. Manche Personen schaffen das zu bestehen, viele
zerbrechen an solchen Schadseiten. Es gab schon versuchte und Selbstmorde, Existenzen
werden bedroht und vernichtet. Nur weil sich kriminelle einen neuen Weg der
Geldbeschaffung ausgedacht haben und mit brutaler Härte ihren Plan durchziehen. Was
passiert nach einer solchen Cyber Attacke? Wer hilft den Opfern? Wann haben wir eine
Regulierung, vor allem – wer hat Einfluss auf den Mega Spider „Google“? Hier stellt sich die
Frage der Haftung von Google und deren Verantwortung für ihren Service der die kriminellen
Cyber Täter unterstützt und auch dann nicht verhindert, wenn sie bösgläubig gemacht
wurden. Wir sind der Meinung dass sich Google genau solche Straftaten zurechnen lassen
muss, spätestens dann wenn sie bösgläubig gemacht wurden und über die strafbaren Inhalte
der Seiten wie Gomopa.net informiert wurden. Bei Yahoo.com haben die Unterzeichner eine wesentlich bessere Kooperation erleben dürfen, auch weniger kompliziert oder unbürokratisch.
Google mangelt es nicht an Arroganz und Überheblichkeit, obwohl er klar aus dem Cache hervorgeht, das Google die infamen und straftatsbeständigen Inhalte zwischenspeichert und im Cache wiedergibt oder gar in der Waybackmaschine auch in den Stalkerseiten speichert.
Und das ist Google bekannt, geholfen wird nicht. Denn was ich eingeben kann, kann ich auch
technisch wieder entfernen und für manche Eingaben muss man kein Jurist sein um
festzustellen ob sie illegal sind, da lang einfach ein gesunder Menschenverstand und das
man lesen kann. Der Ruf nach einer Regulierungsbehörde für Online-Recht, ähnlich dem
Presserecht, wird laut, ja es ist überfällig. Schon fast träge kann man die Einstellung eines
Ministeriums welches Frau Leutheusser Schnarrenberger vorsteht.
Die Datenschutzbeauftragte Aigner protestiert zwar wegen des Google Buzz Angebots:
http://www.focus.de/digital/internet/google/datenschutz-aigner-kritisier…
aid_482344.html, aber auf die kriminelle Cyber Unterstützung von Google geht sie
mit keinem Wort ein.
Ohne Google- keinen Cybercrime! Insofern steht Google als Weltmarktführer in der Verantwortung. Wenn schon bei Google bekannt ist, dass es immer wieder der gleiche Kreis von üblichen Verdächtigten ist, die ihre erpresserischen andere kriminelle Vergehen über Google betreiben, was hält die Judikative, die Legislative und schließlich die Exekutive davon ab, hier sofort und hart durchzugreifen? Eine Regulierungsbehörde sollte installiert werden und es müssen Mindestvoraussetzungen erschaffen werden, die es möglich machen, die Verantwortlichen zu identifizieren – wie eine DNA im Web. Daten und Fakten für Netz- und Webbetreiber. Wenn Google schon die Welt durch Kontrolle verbessern will, da soll sich Larry Page an seiner Aussage in der Wochenzeitschrift „Die Zeit“ vom 05. Februar 2009 auch messen lassen, nämlich dass er „gut“ sein will. Mit der Unterstützung von anonymen Web Adressen und Google Stalking ist er gerade nicht gut. Er muss „besser“ werden. Auf der http://www.tip-talk.com Seite von der -Presse für die Presse- finden Sie eine Übersicht über den Workflow der Google-Technik.
” Ich rate meinen Mandanten Google zu verklagen und anzuzeigen, es muss zu einer Rechtsordnung im Internt kommen, sonst wird das ein böses Erwachen für viele Firmen in naher Zukunft den die Behörden sind restlos überlastet und das nutzen die Cyber Kriminellen aus.” erklärt Rechtsanwalt Frank Feser aus Köln, Fachanwalt für Online Fragen.
Heinz Friedrich, Sprecher der SJB-Fonds-Opfer: „Weite Kreise sehen auch die Cyber-Stalking –Attacken von Maurischat als Ursache für den Tod von Heinz Gerlach und das lebensgefährliche Herzversagen zweier Schweizer Journalisten an. Es scheint dies eine bewusst kalkulierte Methode Maurischats zu sein, seine Kritiker für immer zum Schweigen zu bringen und den Fondsmarkt zu übernehmen – zusammen mit Gerd Bennewirtz‘ SJB, der ja auch selber als Internet Provider agiert und über seine Hamburger Firma Fonds und Friends bzw. seinen „Partner“ Peter Ehlers und dessen Public Imaging zahlreiche Homepages mit den Namen potentieller weiterer Opfer reservieren liess, die ihren Machtbestrebungen im Wege sind.“
Auch das ZDF berichtete vor kurzem über den Cybermörder KlausMaurischat und seine Glücksspiel-Mafia. .In diesem Bericht wurde vor dem Diebstahl von Geldern durch falsche, nicht genehmigte Abbuchungen gewarnt. Dies ist natürlich besonders für die GoMoPa-Abonnenten gefährlich, deren Daten den Cybermördern vorliegen.
Dabei war ein GoMoP-Aussteiger hilfreich. Postwendend wurde er natürlich kurz darauf von Klaus Maurischat bedroht:
„Herr Frickemeier, ich meine es nur gut mit Ihnen. Löschen Sie alle Kommentare, die sich auf Kraeter, Maurischat und Gomopa beziehen. Ignorieren sie diesen Bereich fortan. Ihre Familie wird es Ihnen danken.
http://sjb-fonds-opfer.com/?p=8657
„Sicher nein“, werden Sie jetzt sagen und fragen: „Wer behauptet diesen staatszersetzenden Schwachsinn ?“
„Fonds & Friends-Herausgeber“ Peter Ehlers (wenn der Name stimmt ?) und der Ost-Berliner NACHRICHTENDIENST” “GoMoPa” bezeichneten die deutsche Bundeskanzlerin Angela Merkel und den deutschen Bundes-Finanzminister Wolfgang Schäuble als “kriminelle Hehler” und als Deutschlands „bekannteste Hehler“.
Original-Zitat Peter Ehlers (wenn denn wengistens der Name stimmt, was viele Opfer von “Peter Ehlers” bezweifeln) :
„Wolfgang Schäuble, Finanzminister unter Kanzlerin Angela Merkel. Beide sind sich nicht immer einig. Jetzt schon: Sie wollen als Staat, von deutschen Steuergeldern bezahlt, ein neues staatliches Geschäft eröffnen: Hehlerei.
Peter Ehlers,
Herausgeber DAS INVESTMENT
Ein Kommentar von Peter Ehlers, Herausgeber DAS INVESTMENT
Ein durchaus einträgliches Geschäft, das nur einen Haken hat: Es ist illegal. Schäuble hat dafür eine lustige Rechtsauffassung: Er sieht den Deal, den der damalige Finanzminister Peer Steinbrück („das beste Geschäft meines Lebens“) machte, für sich als Rechtfertigung. Frei nach dem billigen Motto: Wenn mein Vorgänger kriminell war, darf ich das ja wohl auch sein.“
Das heisst nicht nur Schäuble handelt illegal und kriminell – im ganz grossen Stil, sondern auch die Vorgänger Ex-Bundes-Finanzminister Peer Steinbrück und Ex-Bundeskanzler Gerhard Schröder und die Bundeskanzlerin Angela Merkel sowieso.
Da komme ich ja noch gut weg:
Mich bezeichnet Peter Ehlers (wenn denn wengistens der Name stimmt ?) als “Internet-Terroristen”, „Erpresser“, „Gewohnheitsverbrecher“ und „Idioten“, ach ja meinen akademischen Titel Magister Artium täusche ich auch vor, sagen Peter Ehlers und GoMoPa, unisono. All das im “renommierten” “Scheisshausfliegen-Blog” und der “renommierten” Webseite “GoMoPa” der Urmutter aller “Scheisshausfliegen-Blogs” dieser Welt des wegen Anlagebetruges an seinem eigenen Anleger einschlägig vorbestraften Klaus Maurischat Aktenzeichen 28 Ls 85/05.
Dies ist bezeichnet für die psychotische Wahnwelt dieser mutmasslich kommunistischen Delinquenten aus dem Osten Deutschlands und nur die Spitze des schmutzigen Eisberges.
Zum hier aktuell vorliegenden Tatbestand:
Im deutschen Strafrecht ist die Beamtenbeleidigung kein eigener Tatbestand. Ein Beamter ist hier nicht anders gestellt als ein anderer Bürger. Es handelt sich also um eine „normale“ Beleidigung gemäß § 185StGB.
Dennoch gibt es bei der Beleidigung eines Amtsträgers, der nicht zwingend Beamter sein muss, eine verfahrensrechtliche Besonderheit: Während die Straftat grundsätzlich nur auf Antrag des Verletzten verfolgt wird, kann gemäß § 194 Abs. 3 StGB bei Amtsträgern auch der Dienstvorgesetzte des Beleidigten den Strafantrag stellen:
„Ist die Beleidigung gegen einen Amtsträger, einen für den öffentlichen Dienst besonders Verpflichteten oder einen Soldaten der Bundeswehr während der Ausübung seines Dienstes oder in Beziehung auf seinen Dienst begangen, so wird sie auch auf Antrag des Dienstvorgesetzten verfolgt. Richtet sich die Tat gegen eine Behörde oder eine sonstige Stelle, die Aufgaben der öffentlichen Verwaltung wahrnimmt, so wird sie auf Antrag des Behördenleiters oder des Leiters der aufsichtführenden Behörde verfolgt. Dasselbe gilt für Träger von Ämtern und für Behörden der Kirchen und anderen Religionsgesellschaften des öffentlichen Rechts.“
Außerdem wird von der Staatsanwaltschaft in der Regel das öffentliche Interesse an der Strafverfolgung bejaht, so dass es weitaus seltener zur Verweisung auf den Privatklageweg oder zur Einstellung des Verfahrens nach § 153, 153a StPO kommt.
In der Praxis zieht die Beleidigung vor allem von (Polizei-)Beamten meist Geldstrafen nach sich. Bei mehrfach wegen solcher Delikte vorbestraften Personen sind in der Praxis schon kurze Freiheitsstrafen von z. B. 3 Monaten ohne Bewährung vorgekommen.
Fallbeispiel:
Beleidigung von Amtsträgern”Prozesse-Dieter” verurteilt
“Prozesse-Dieter”, prozessfreudiger Sozialhilfeempfänger aus Ratingen, ist zu einem Jahr Haft verurteilt worden. Das Amtsgericht in Ratingen bei Düsseldorf sprach den als “König der Kläger” bekannt gewordenen ehemaligen 73-jährigen Sportlehrer wegen 44 Beleidigungen von Amtsträgern wie Beamten, Richtern und Rechtspflegern schuldig.
Per Postkarten hatte sie der Senior mit Fäkalausdrücken überzogen. Das Gericht setzte sich über den psychiatrischen Gutachter hinweg, der den Angeklagten als schuldunfähig eingestuft hatte, weil dieser an einer paranoiden Persönlichkeitsstörung leide.
Dies trifft möglicherweise auch auf die Delinquenten Peter Ehlers/”GoMoPa” zu.
Zum Thema Wirecard und “GoMoPa” schreibt das “Handelsblatt:
exklusiv Die Bundesanstalt für Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht BaFin hat aufgrund der merkwürdigen Kursturbulenzen der Wirecard-Aktie eine förmliche Untersuchung des Falles eingeleitet. BaFin prüft mögliche Marktmanipulationen nach Falschbericht des Internetdienstes Gomopa. Zwei der Gomopa-Gründer wurden schon 2006 wegen Betrugs verurteilt.
FRANKFURT. Die Bundesanstalt für Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht BaFin hat aufgrund der merkwürdigen Kursturbulenzen der Wirecard-Aktie eine förmliche Untersuchung des Falles eingeleitet. “Wir prüfen, ob es Anhaltspunkte für Marktmanipulation in Aktien der Wirecard AG gibt”, sagte eine BaFin-Sprecherin. Zu Details könne sie sich jedoch nicht äußern.
Der Kurs des Münchener Zahlungsabwicklers Wirecard war am vergangenen Dienstag um mehr als 30 Prozent eingebrochen. Am Abend zuvor hatte der Internetdienst Goldman, Morgenstern & Partners (Gomopa) berichtet, der in den USA wegen illegalen Online-Glücksspiels verhaftete Deutsche Michael Schütt habe in einem Geständnis Wirecard schwer belastet. Gomopa bezog sich auf einen Bericht der Lokalzeitung “Naples News”. Schütt habe ausgesagt, er sei bei illegalen Geldgeschäften direkt vom Wirecard-Vorstand beauftragt worden.
Das Problem an dem Gomopa-Bericht: Er war falsch. Wie Nachfragen des Handelsblattes ergaben, hat die Reporterin, die für die “Naples News” über Schütt schreibt, Wirecard nie erwähnt. Gomopa reagierte auf Nachfragen zögerlich. Erst löschte der Dienst den Hinweis auf die Lokalzeitung, hielt aber den Vorwurf aufrecht, Schütt habe Wirecard belastet. Danach änderte man den Bericht erneut. Nun hieß es, ein Informant von Gomopa verfüge über die fraglichen Details aus Schütts Geständnis.
Dem Handelsblatt liegt inzwischen das amtliche Protokoll von Schütts Geständnis am 23. März vor. Schütt bekennt sich darin schuldig, illegale Geldgeschäfte im Zusammenhang mit Online-Glücksspiel abgewickelt zu haben. Das Wort Wirecard kommt nicht vor. Gomopa hatte zu Wochenbeginn seinen Text erneut geändert und nun behauptet, Schütt belaste “eine Bank”. Auf erneute Nachfragen des Handelsblattes war der Bericht dann ganz verschwunden.
Der Kurs von Wirecard hat sich inzwischen fast vollständig erholt. Ein Frankfurter Analyst sagte, für ihn sei klar, dass die Aktie seit Wochen manipuliert werde. Erst verteure sich die Leihe der Aktie, dann komme es zu außergewöhnlichem Handel, danach tauchten plötzlich desaströse Gerüchte auf. Dazu gehöre auch die Anzeige, die vor kurzem bei der Staatsanwaltschaft München einging und Wirecard der Geldwäsche bezichtigt. Es sei offensichtlich, dass Short Seller mit der Wirecard-Aktie Jojo spielen.
Mark Vornkahl, einer der Gründer von Gomopa wies den Vorwurf der Kursmanipulation gestern zurück. Man wolle nur die Wahrheit aufdecken. Es ist allerdings nicht das erste Mal, dass Gomopa-Vertreter ins Zwielicht geraten. 2006 wurden Vornkahl und Mitgründer Klaus Maurischat wegen Betrugs an einem Anleger verurteilt. Maurischat gab gestern gegenüber dem Handelsblatt weitere Verurteilungen zu. Es habe sich dabei jedoch nicht um Anlagebetrug gehandelt.
UND SOLCHE TYPEN VERBREITEN WEITERE ENTEN AUS IRGENDEINEM SADDAM – ERDLOCH WÄHREND IN IHREM “VIRTUELLEN BÜRO” NUR EIN LEERER STUHL STEHT.
Ich bin der Erbe unseres Familienbuches und damit das Oberhaupt unserer Familie Pulch. Unsere Familie hat seit Jahrunderten in Deutschland, USA und vielen anderen Ländern, erfolgreiche Unternehmer, Staatssekretäre, Banker, Richter, Anwälte, Politiker und auch Journalisten hervorgebracht. Wir lassen unseren guten Namen nicht durch vorbestrafte Anlagebetrüger, Cybermörder und Stasi/NS-Kriminelle verunglimpfen. Deren Taten und Fäkalsprache sprechen für sich und bedürfen keiner ernsthaften Auseinandersetzung.
Die bezahlten Betrüger sollen die Kapitalanlage-Verbrecher schützen.
Darum geht es im Kern. Wie auch schon unter
und
http://sjb-fonds-opfer.com/?page_id=11764
klar ersichtlich.
Hier ist der Original-Bericht von Meridian Capital
Ich werde die kriminellen Verantwortlichen und ihre kriminellen Helfershelfer bis zur letzten Konsequenz zur Verantwortung ziehen.
Magister Bernd Pulch
PS Ich bedanke mich bei investment-on.com sowie allen anderen Medien für die Möglichkeit, die Dinge gerade zu rücken.
Dies muss man diametral entgegen gesetzt lesen
Finanznachrichtendienst Goldman, Morgenstern & Partners setzt hohe Belohnung aus
[datensicherheit.de, 17.09.2009] Der New Yorker Finanznachrichtendienst “Goldman, Morgenstern & Partners” (GoMoPA) setzt zur Ergreifung mutmaßlicher “Internet-Terroristen” eine Belohnung in Höhe von einer Million US-Dollar aus:
Das Geld stehe dem zu, der gerichtsverwertbare Beweise über die Hintermänner einer der größten Cyber-Attacken der letzten Jahre liefere. Seit dem 1. September 2009 würden in immer stärker werdenden Wellen DDoS-Attacken auf den Nachrichtendienst erfolgen, so dass die Website für ihre monatlich fast eine Million Leser nicht mehr erreichbar ist. Das FBI habe die Ermittlungen aufgenommen.
Seit zehn Jahren berichtet der Nachrichtendienst über dubiose Geschäfte auf dem Finanz- und Grauen Kapitalmarkt und habe so Schäden für die Anleger in Millionenhöhe vermeiden können. GoMoPA vermutet hinter den Angriffen den kriminellen Versuch, “eine unbestechliche Medienstimme auszuschalten”. Mit der hohen Belohnung werde bezweckt, mafiöse Strukturen zum Schutze aller im Internet zu zerschlagen und die Pressefreiheit zu bewahren.
Weitere Informationen zum Thema:
GoMoPA, 15.09.2009
1 Million Dollar Belohnung
Liebe Leser,
auch heute wurde wieder ein angesehenes Immobilienunternehmen aus Süddeutschland von der STASI-“GoMoPa” verleumdet.
Unabhängige Ermittler sagen: Zitat
“Nachdem sie mit STASI-Methoden aus der Toxdat-Studie Heinz Gerlach vergiftet haben, wollen sie nun den Kapitalmarkt mithilfe des “Mediums” “GoMoPa” besser des Ost-Berliner-STASI-Tarn-Pamphletes “GoMoPa” und ihrer kongenialen Verbündeten Peter Ehlers und Gerd Bennewirtz übernehmen. Dabei sind die Hintermänner und “Experten” “Anlegerschutzanwälte” von eigenen Gnaden.”
Zitatende
Dabei bin ich diesen “Herren” und den vorbestraften Serienbetrügern der “GoMoPa” und ihren Hintermännern im Wege.
Da sie unsere Server und Webseiten nicht ausschalten konnten und bislang auch ihre vielfältigen finanziellen und auch physischen Vernichtungsfeldzüge gegen mich nicht fruchteten, werde ich diffamiert – ohne den Hauch eines Beweises.
Unsere Seite hingegen hat sehr viele Behörden TATSÄCHLICH eingeschaltet und dementsprechend die Aktenzeichen sowie die genauen Beweise aufgezeigt.
Ich bin überzeugt davon, dass es vielen anderen Personen und Unternehmen ebenso geht. Tagtäglich bekommen wir hierzu neue Infos.
Wie sehr diese Figuren Angst vor der Wahrheit haben, zeigt ihre krankhafte Google-Lösch-Manie, der alle seriösen und kritischen Artikel zum Opfer fallen sollen – Medienzensur wie in der DDR.
Wir gehen davon aus, dass sie direkt oder indirekt V-Leute bei Google in Hamburg haben, sonst wäre dieses skandalöse Verhalten des Suchmaschinenbetreibers nicht möglich.
Deswegen wurde auch Strafanzeige gegen Google in Deutschland und in den USA gestellt und wir haben die FBI Cybercrime Division über die Vorfälle unterrichtet.
Allem Augenschein nach, hat “GoMopa” nicht mehr die Fähigkeit Denial of Service-Attacken zu starten – wie es noch im Oktober massiv der Fall war – gegen uns und zuvor gegen viele andere STASI-Feinde.
Ich sage Ihnen klipp und klar, was “GoMoPa” bei mir und meinem Umfeld im letzten Jahr aufgeführt hat, stammt aus dem STASI-Handbuch.
Dies ist keineswegs eine Übertreibung. Alle FAKTEN zeigen, das dies ein gross angelegtes Projekt von Ex-STASI-Leuten und deren neuen Rekruten ist.
Diese Leute sind geschult und gehen systematisch analog zu ihrer Schulung und STASI-Ausbildung vor.
Wir haben die Häupter der Verschwörung enttarnt und deren Lebenslinien aufgedeckt.
Gerne stehe ich Ihnen jederzeit für Rückfragen zur Verfügung.
Herzlichst Ihr
Magister Bernd Pulch
Nachfolgend ein Artikel eines von “GoMoPa” seit Jahren verfolgten Journalisten:
Sehr geehrte Leserin, sehr geehrter Leser,
die sehr angeschlagenen Gesundheitszustände des GSP-Admins- und Managers Herbert
ERNST (*siehe LINK zur GSP Golden Star Partners, Inc.-Community ) und seines langjährigen
Vertrauensfreunds Dipl. Ing.Paul Bosel, haben mich nun veranlasst, diesen Artikel zu
veröffentlichen.
Paul Bosel, der seit 8 Jahren im GoMoPa-Forum übel verleumdet wird, hat seine letzte
Herzoperation gerade nochmal gut überstanden.
Herbert Ernst, der als Autor die meisten dieser News und Beiträge in dieser Community und
vielen anderen Websites verfasst hat, ist nunmehr auch am gestrigen Abend wegen
Herzversagen in eine Notfallklinik in der Schweiz eingeliefert worden.
Mit Herbert Ernst hatte ich als Autor dieser Zeilen in den letzten Tagen mehrmals ausführlich
wegen den Gomopa-Maurischat-Attacken telefoniert.
Es ging dabei hauptsächlich um die aktuellen Drohungen des Klaus Maurischat, dass er die
Webseiten von Herbert Ernst alle mit Hilfe seiner Hacker-Freunde attackieren, bzw. auslöschen
würde, wenn ich nicht meine Anti-Stalking-Seiten (siehe unten) sofort bis spätestens zum
05.11.2010) vom Netz nehmen würde.
Ich mache mir nun grosse Sorgen um die weitere Gesundheit des Herbert Ernst und hoffe, dass er
sich nun eine Auszeit von seinen vielfältigen Aufgaben und Bemühungen nimmt.
Meine grosse Hoffnung ist die, dass er diese immens starke Gesundheits-Warnung überlebt. Ich
darf hoffen, dass es ihm nicht ähnlich ergeht, wie dem dieses Jahr plötzlich verstorbenen und sehr
bekannten Anlage-Aufklärer Heinz Gerlach, der nach meiner Sicht ebenfalls ein
Rufmordopfer des GoMoPa-Verantwortlichen Klaus Maurischat war. Meinen Nachruf an
Heinz Gerlach finden Sie auch hier bei den News in dieser Community!
Link http://golden-stars-partners.net/nv/News/Nachruf-fuer-den-verstorbenen-Heinz-Gerlach_69
Heinz Gerlach wurde “nur 66 Jahre alt”! Herbert Ernst ist bereits 70 Jahre alt geworden, lebte
immer sportlich fit, aber das, was ihm die Stalker von GoMoPa in seine Wege und Ziele zur
Vermeidung von Altersarmut seit Jahren (2007) in den Weg legten, kann kein gesunder
Mensch auf Dauer überleben!
Hier mein Beitrag, den hoffentlich viele Mitmenschen lesen und überdenken sollten:
Klaus Maurischats Stalking-Methoden
Ja,-sie funktioniert. Seit 8 Jahren!
2
2 GoMoPa.net-Maurischat-Internetstalking und Erpressung
Ja,- und die Methode Maurischat ist so brutal und für normal denkende Menschen kaum
vorstellbar!
Wir,-die CSA-Agency, sind schon seit Beginn des GoMoPa.net-Forums seit 2002 im Kreuzfeuer
seiner Bemühungen, uns auszuschalten.
Er will nun nicht nur unsere Seiten mit seinen Hackerfreunden abschiessen (löschen) lassen,
sondern uns noch dazu ´ausräuchern`, wie er es seit (14.10.2010) zunächst wieder formuliert.
Ausserdem hat er uns jetzt angedroht, die ihm bekannten Angehörigen und Freunde aus dem
persönlichen Umfeld unseres Presse-Autors persönlich mit seinen infamen Stalkingmethoden
wie folgt in der Öffentlichkeit und in deren privatem Umfeld anzuprangern.
Um grossen persönlichen Schaden von den benannten Personen abzuwenden, hat die CSAAgency
im Interesse dieser anständigen Mitmenschen sofort (15.10.2010) alle
Aufklärungsbeiträge über GoMoPa.net aus dem Internet genommen. Alle Vorgänge sind
dokumentiert und stehen den Betroffenen und Ermittlungsbehörden zur Verfügung.
Maurischats Verbrechermethoden mit gezieltem Rufmord!
Er nimmt zunächst mit Hilfe seiner Helfershelfer Familienmitglieder, Angehörige, Freunde oder
Nachbarn seiner Opfer aufs Korn. Ist ja heutzutage kein Problem mehr, über Soziale Netzwerke
wie z.B. Facebook solche zu finden.
Er lässt mit Google-Mailadressen-Suche Hunderte von Mailadressen aus dem örtlichen Umfeld
dieser Personen suchen.
Dann lanciert er einen unwahren Verleumdungsbericht in seinem GoMoPa-Forum. Diese
Beiträge sind an Abscheulichkeit nicht zu übertreffen.
Meistens werden die so angeprangerten krimineller Handlungen bezichtigt. Beispielsweise der
Geldwäsche, Finanzbetrügereien oder Drogenhandel.
Wir CSA-Team-Mitglieder werden so seit Beginn des Gomopa-Forums 2002 beispielsweise als
international von Interpol gesuchte Finanzbetrüger bezeichnet.
So machte er es auch mit unseren früheren Homepage-Providern, die er in seinem Forum mit
unwahren Berichten konfrontierte. So lange, bis wir im Interesse dieser anständigen jungen
Leute alle unsere Berichte zu GoMoPa gelöscht haben. Danach löschte er die unwahren Beiträge
über die Provider.
Dann konfrontiert Maurischat mit dem Link zum unwahren Beitrag im Gomopa-Forum die
Inhaber der gesammelten Mailadressen aus dem Umfeld des Verleumdungsopfers.
Mit dem Resultat, dass Nachbarn, Freunde im Ort plötzlich sich vom Opfer zurückziehen. Nach
dem Motto: Es könnte ja was dran sein!
GoMoPa-Presse-Portal
3
3 GoMoPa.net-Maurischat-Internetstalking und Erpressung
Des weiteren setzt Maurischat seine GoMoPa-Presse-Portal -Aktionen ein.
Maurischat rühmt sich damit, dass er mit seinen eigenen Presse-News über hunderttausend
Leser erreichen kann.
Des weiteren werden die unwahren Beiträge zum Verleumdungsopfer als GoMoPa-Presse-
Artikel in vielen Presseportalen gestreut.
Zudem kommt hinzu, dass Maurischat seine Helfershelfer (gegen Bezahlung natürlich) benutzt,
Strafanzeigen bei der zuständigen Staatsanwaltschaft des angeprangerten Opfers zu stellen.
Das wirkt natürlich besonders glaubwürdig in den Augen des Betrachters.
Tatsache ist, dass sich seine Helfershelferin Renate F., (Name,Adresse aus Anti-Stalking-
Gründen gekürzt) damit brüstet, dass sie nun den dritten Strafantrag gegen ein
Verleumdungsopfer stellt, nachdem die ersten beiden im Laufe von zwei Jahren von der
zuständigen Staatsanwaltschaft mangels Beweisen eingestellt worden waren.
Diese Methode Maurischat ist abscheulich! Strafrechtlich werden solche Stalking-Attacken in
Deutschland schon im Einzelfall mit Gefängnis bis zu drei Jahren bestraft. Bei Maurischat
kommen nachweisbar viele Stalking-Tatbestände und noch weitere wie Erpressung hinzu.
Maurischat ist schon mehrfach vorbestraft und kennt deutsche Haftanstalten als Insasse gut von
innen.
Zuletzt war er als Finanzbetrüger mit dreijähriger Bewährungsfrist bis April 2009 verurteilt
worden.
Klaus Maurischat und Mark Vornkahl, Betreiber von http://www.gomopa.net: Am 24. April
2006 war die Verhandlung am Amtsgericht Krefeld in der Betrugssache: Mark Vornkahl /
Klaus Maurischat ./. Dehnfeld. Aktenzeichen: 28 Ls 85/05 Klaus Maurischat Lange Straße
27313 Dörverden.
Maurischat lebt heute in Portugal nahe Porto in seiner Pension. Weit weg und sicher vor den
Zugriffen der deutschen Ermittlungsbehörden!
Allerdings hat Maurischat vor zwei Jahren eine deutsche GoMoPa-GmbH in Berlin eingerichtet,
um seine Fassade einer GoMoPa-Briefkastenfirma in den USA zu verbessern.
So steht der deutsche GoMoPa-GmbH-Geschäftsführer Peter Reski voll in der strafrechtlich
relevanten Haftung gegenüber den Geschädigten.
GoMoPa GmbH
10117 Berlin
Bundesrepublik Deutschland
Telefonnummer: (030) 21233660
Telefaxnummer: (030) 212336611
4
4 GoMoPa.net-Maurischat-Internetstalking und Erpressung
Maurischats Erpressungsmethoden
Nach der Devise: ´Wer nicht zahlt wird fertiggemacht!`.
Mit Hilfe negativer Einträge in seinem GoMoPa-Forum!
Maurischat hat sein Handwerk, wie in unseren Beiträgen dokumentiert,
bereits in den 90er Jahren im letzten Jahrhundert in Form seines Russen-Inkassos gelernt.
Die entsprechenden Beiträge finden Sie heute noch im Anlegerschutz-Magazin von ´Börse
Online`.
Die CSA-Agency kann aufgrund ihrer 8-Jährigen Erfahrung mit dem GoMafia-Forum davon
ausgehen, dass zumindest Hunderte der genannten Personen / Unternehmen in der GoMoPa-
Datenbank und in der GoMoPa-Warnliste dort zu Unrecht aufgeführt sind!
Oftmals auch zu Unrecht im Forum dargestellt, weil sie den Erpressungsversuchen des
GoMoPa-Paten-Teams nicht nachgekommen sind.
Oder auch, weil sie oftmals nicht die erforderlichen Geldmittel zur Löschung der Beiträge
aufwenden konnten!
Nachweisbar ist, dass die so erpressten Verleumdungsopfer zwischen ein paar tausend bis über 50.000
Euro zur Löschung der Negativ-Beiträge aufzubringen haben.
So ist nachvollziehbar, dass gerade Großbetrüger und Abzocker am Grauen
Kapitalmarkt (dem staatlich nicht regulierten Kapitalmarkt) unbehelligt von Maurischat
und seinem GoMOPa-Forum abzocken können.
Martin Sachs, CSA Presse Redakteur
CSA-Presse-Agentur 04.11.2010
mailto:csa-security@web.de
http://www.gomafia-stalking.net/
http://www.csa-anlegerschutz.net/
Sven Schmidt, der “Computer-Experte” bei “GoMoPa” ist für den Internet-Müll verantwortlich
z
Liebe Leser,
ZITAT
“Stellen Sie sich vor, Sie werden als pädophilier Kinderschänder im Internet bezeichnet! Oder als Koksdealer! Als Betrüger, als Verbrecher!? Das kann schnell passieren, denn die Zeit des herkömmlichen Stalkings ist vorbei. Stundenlanges „auf das Opfer lauern“ gehört der Geschichte an. Das Internet hat es möglich gemacht und das Vorgehen krimineller Rufmörder hat eine neue, hocheffektive Qualität erreicht! Internetstalking heißt diese Verbrechensart und sie ist eine nie da gewesene Art von Verleumdung und Denunzierung. Ausschließlich negative Absichten und kriminelle Energie treiben die Stalker der neuen Generation an. Zielobjekte sind Privatpersonen, Firmen und unliebsame Mitbewerber gleichermaßen, aber auch unbestechliche Journalisten oder Forenbetreiber gehören immer mehr zu den Leidtragenden.
Und diese Stalker, sie gehen stets gleich vor. Sie schreiben in Foren, Blogs oder Anzeigenmärkten negativ oder verleumderisch über die entsprechende Zielperson. Sodann eröffnen sie spezielle Internetseiten auf exotischen Servern. Sie arbeiten ausschließlich aus der Anonymität! Entsprechende Beiträge werden mit hoher Dichte rekursiv untereinander verlinkt. Dabei wird das Zielobjekt vor allem auf Web-Adressen mit vielen Usern und einem hohem PageRank genannt und mit dafür eigens ins Netz gestellten Verleumdungsseiten verbunden. Auf diese Weise ist sichergestellt, dass jede Suchmaschinenanfrage nach dem Namen des Verleumdeten immer zuerst die vom Stalker platzierten Verleumdungen als Ergebnis liefert. Das Ziel des Stalkers ist erreicht!
Angesichts der zunehmenden Verbreitung des Internets und Googels marktbeherrschender Stellung hat dieses Vorgehen höchst negative Effekte für die Betroffenen: Personalchefs googlen mittlerweile genauso gerne nach Bewerbernamen, wie potentielle Auftraggeber von Selbständigen und Freiberuflern nach Namen eventueller, neuer Geschäftspartner. Die Folgen sind die gleichen: Arbeitsplatzverlust, Versagung oder Verlust von Aufträgen. Finden Bekannte oder Freunde diese Verleumdungen und werden nicht aufgeklärt ist, kann dies auch zur Distanzierung betroffener Personen zur Folge haben, die meist überhaupt nicht wissen warum.
Internet und Suchmaschinen Stalker beabsichtigen stets ganz bewusst Existenzen zu vernichten und das Zielobjekt nachhaltig privat, sozial und beruflich zu diskriminieren und zu schädigen. Sie handeln stets anonym und es ist kaum möglich juristisch gegen diese Art von Internetterroristen vorzugehen. Server stehen in exotischen Standorten wie Vietnam oder Kambodscha, werden anonym per Westernunion gezahlt und der eingetragene Admin C ist nicht existent, zumal deutsche Gerichte nicht zuständig sind! Das neue Medium Internet eröffnet Verleumdungs- und Denunzierungsterroristen Tür und Tor – Willkommen in der schönen neuen Welt von morgen!”
ZITATENDE
HIER BESCHREIBT GOLDMAN; MORGENSTERN & PARTNER EXAKT IHRE EIGENE AREBITSWEISE AUF
http://www.blogspan.net/969-gomopa-warnung-neu-internet-stalking.html
AUCH DAS GEHÖRT ZU DEN TRICKS DER CYBER-MAFIA
Sehr geehrte Damen und Herren,
nachfolgend neueste Infos gegen die Kriminellen-Organisation “GoMoPa”:
Die Opfer der letzten Tage sind zahlreich.
Hinzu kommt, wir haben die Unterlagen an das FBI, Abteilung Cybercrime, weitergeleitet, um weitere Opfer vor dem “Wirken” dieser “Nachrichtendienstler” aus Ost-Berlin zu schützen.
Herzlichst Ihr
Magister Bernd Pulch
Peter Ehlers, mutmasslicher Strohmann und “Partner” des umstrittenen Finanzvermittlers, Gerd
Bennewirtz, SJB Fonds, und “Herausgeber” nimmt es mit der Wahrheit nicht genau.
Sein Anzeigenaufkommen ist stark rückläufig. Zudem wird gegen ihn und
Bennewirtz in immer mehr Fällen ermittelt.
Unser Magazin INVESTMENT ist seit dem Jahre 2000 in den
deutschsprachigen Ländern am Markt und in den
englischsprachigen Ländern schon viel länger.
“Das Investment” hiess noch vor kurzem hingegen noch “Der Fonds” gehört zu über
65% der Ehefrau des umstrittenen Finanzvermittlers Gerd Bennewirtz, Gaby
Bennewirtz (Korschenbroich). Gegen Bennewirtz haben – wie er selber in der ” Rheinischen Post”
am 13.10. 2010 zugab 12 seiner Anleger Strafanzeige u.a. wegen Betruges und Untreue gestellt
Nach unserem Kenntnisstand sind es sogar weit mehr.
Auf unserer deutschsprachigen Homepage steht klar und deutlich, dass wir
unabhängig von Finanzfirmen und insbesondere von der Firma SJB sind.
(siehe: http://www.investment-on.com)
Wir haben nie irgendwelche Marktteilnehmer zu irgendwelchen Massnahmen
gezwungen. Dies soll bewusst suggeriert werden, um Misstrauen zu säen.
Gegen Peter Ehlers und seine mutmasslichen Komplizen von “Das
Investment” hingegen ermitteln unter anderem die Staatsanwaltschaften in Hamburg
und Wiesbaden wegen vieler Delikte unter unter anderem wegen Betruges,
Geschäftsschädigung und Falschaussagen unter anderem unter folgenden
Aktenzeichen
– ST 1044410/2010 Wiesbaden
– 035/1K/608828/2010 Hamburg
Beweis: Kriminalpolizei Hamburg und Wiesbaden
Herr Bernd Pulch ist nur einer von 3 Herausgebern eines Magazins in unserer
Gruppe. Er lebt in London. Es kann jederzeit gegen ihn bzw. unseren Verlag
Klage an unserer Londoner Adresse eingebracht werden.
Herr Pulch hat Publizistik bei Noelle Neumann und Kepplinger in Mainz
studiert und abgeschlossen und anschliessend bei u.a.Fox/Lorber, New York, ZDF,
ARD, Horizont und Werben & Verkaufen gearbeitet (siehe ww.kressreport).
Peter Ehlers und Gerd Bennewirtz stehen in mutmasslich krimineller Verbindung zu
dem “Finanznachrichtendienst GoMoPa”,gegen den ebenfalls die
Staatsanwaltschaften wegen Kapitalanlageverbrechen (u.a. “Wirecard”) ermitteln.
u.a. Aktenzeichen ST/0148943/2011
Wesentliche Mitarbeiter von “GoMoPa” simd serienweise vorbestraft (Aktenzeichen Krefeld vom 24. April 2006; AZ: 28 Ls 85/05 ) u.a. wegen Betruges am eigenen Anleger.
Von alldem sollen seine inszenierten Angriffe gegen “Das INVESTMENT MAGAZIN”
(Das Original) und Herrn Bernd Pulch persönlich sowie weitere Mitarbeiter und Ex-Mitarbeiter ablenken.
Gerne sende wir Ihnen weitere detaillierte Informationen zu den mutmasslich
kriminellen Aktionen der Cyberstalker GoMoPa, Peter Ehlers und Gerd Bennewirtz
zu.
siehe auch http://www.investment-on.com
und
sowie
Liebe Leser
nachfolgend bringen wir eine Original-Pressemeldung von „GoMoPa“, dem „NACHRICHTENDIENST“ mit dem Meridian Capital, London, erpresst werden sollte. Der Artikel strotzt nur von Fehlern. Damit ist deutlich, dass „GoMoPa“ tatsäch Meridian Capital erpresst hat und die Aktionen von Meridian Capital sich gegen „GoMoPa“ gerichtet haben.
„GoMopa“ schreibt:
08.09.2008
Weltweite Finanzierungen mit Widersprüchen
Die Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. gibt an, weltweite Finanzierungen anbieten zu können und präsentiert sich hierbei auf aufwendig kreierten Webseiten. GOMOPA hat die dort gemachten Angaben analysiert und Widersprüche entdeckt.
Der Firmensitz
Der Firmensitz befindet sich laut eigener Aussage in Dubai, Vereinigte Arabische Emirate. In einem GOMOPA vorliegenden Schreiben der Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. heißt es jedoch, der Firmensitz sei in London. Auf der Homepage des Unternehmens taucht die Geschäftsadresse in der Londoner Old Broad Street nur als „Kundenabteilung für deutschsprachige Kunden“ auf. Eine weitere Adresse in der englischen Hauptstadt, diesmal in der Windsor Avenue, sei die „Abteilung der Zusammenarbeit mit Investoren“.
Die Meridian Capital Enterprises ist tatsächlich als „Limited“ (Ltd.) mit Sitz in England und Wales eingetragen. Aber laut Firmenhomepage hat das Unternehmen seinen „rechtlichen Geschäftssitz“ in Dubai. Eine Abfrage beim Gewerbeamt Dubais (DED) zu dieser Firmierung bleibt ergebnislos.
Bemerkenswert ist auch der vermeintliche Sitz in Israel. Auf der Webseite von Meridian Capital Enterprises heißt es: „Die Firma Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. ist im Register des israelischen Justizministeriums unter der Nummer 514108471, gemäß dem Gesellschaftsrecht von 1999, angemeldet.“ Hierzu Martin Kraeter, Gomopa-Partner und Prinzipal der KLP Group Emirates in Dubai: „Es würde keinem einzigen Emirati – geschweige denn einem Scheich auch nur im Traum einfallen, direkte Geschäfte mit Personen oder Firmen aus Israel zu tätigen. Und schon gar nicht würde er zustimmen, dass sein Konterfei auch noch mit vollem Namen auf der Webseite eines Israelischen Unternehmens prangt.“
Auf der Internetseite sind diverse Fotos mit Scheichs an Konferenztischen zu sehen. Doch diese großen Tagungen und großen Kongresse der Meridian Capital Enterprises werden in den Pressearchiven der lokalen Presse Dubais mit keinem Wort erwähnt.
Martin Kraeter: „ Ein ‚britisch-arabisch-israelisches bankfremdes Finanzinstitut sein zu wollen, wie die Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. es darstellt, ist mehr als zweifelhaft. So etwas gibt es schlicht und ergreifend nicht! Der Nahostkonflikt schwelt schon seit mehr als 50 Jahren. Hier in den Vereinigten Arabischen Emiraten (VAE) werden Israelis erst gar nicht ins Land gelassen. Israelische Produkte sind gebannt. Es gibt nicht einmal direkte Telefonverbindungen. Die VAE haben fast 70% der Wiederaufbaukosten des Libanon geschultert, nachdem Israel dort einmarschiert ist.“
Zwei angebliche Großinvestitionen der Meridian Capital Enterprises in Dubai sind Investmentruinen bzw. erst gar nicht realisierte Projekte. Das Unternehmen wirbt mit ihrer finanziellen Beteiligung an dem Dubai Hydropolis Hotel und dem Dubai Snowdome.
Der Aktivitätsstatus der Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. ist laut englischen Handelsregister (UK Companies House) „dormant“ gemeldet. Auf der Grundlage des englischen Gesellschaftsrechts können sich eingetragene Unternehmen selbst „dormant“ (schlafend) melden, wenn sie keine oder nur unwesentliche buchhalterisch zu erfassende Transaktionen vorgenommen haben. Dies ist angesichts der angeblichen globalen Investitionstätigkeit der Meridian Capital Ltd. sehr erstaunlich.
Der Webauftritt
Die Internetseite der MCE ist sehr aufwendig gestaltet, die Investitionen angeblich in Millionen- und Milliardenhöhe. Bei näherer Betrachtung der Präsentationselemente fällt jedoch auf, dass es sich bei zahlreichen veröffentlichen Fotos, die Veranstaltungen der Meridian Capital Enterprises dokumentieren sollen, meist um Fotos von Online-Zeitungen oder frei zugänglichen Medienfotos einzelner Institutionen handelt wie z.B. der Börse Dubai.
Auf der Internetpräsenz befinden sich Videofilmchen, die eine frappierende Ähnlichkeit mit dem Werbematerial von NAKHEEL aufweisen, dem größten Bauträger der Vereinigten Arabischen Emirate. Doch den schillernden Videos über die berühmten drei Dubai Palmen „Jumeirah, Jebel Ali und Deira“ oder das Archipel „The World“ wurden offensichtlich selbstproduzierte Trailersequenzen der Meridian Capital Enterprises vorangestellt. Doch könnte es sich bei den Werbevideos um Fremdmaterial handeln.
Auch die auf der Webseite wahllos platzierten Fotos von bekannten Sehenswürdigkeiten Dubais fungieren als Augenfang für den interessierten Surfer mit eigenem Finanzierungswunsch. Bei einem Volumen von 10 Millionen Euro oder höher präsentiert sich die Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. als der passende Investitionspartner. Das Unternehmen verfügt weltweit über zahlreiche Standorte: Berlin, London, Barcelona, Warschau, Moskau, Dubai, Riad, Tel Aviv, Hong Kong und New York. Aber nahezu alle Standorte sind lediglich Virtual Offices eines global arbeitenden Büroservice-Anbieters. „Virtual Office“ heißt im Deutschen schlicht „Briefkastenfirma“. Unter solchen Büroadressen sollen laut Meridian Capital Enterprises ganze Kommissionen ansässig sein, alles zum Wohle des Kunden.“
Zitatende
Dies ist das altbekannte Muster des „NACHRCHTENDIENSTES“ „GoMoPa“ und seiner Berliner und Hamburger Komplizen Falschmeldungen zu verbreiten, um Firmen und Personen erpressen oder ausschalten zu können.
Weil wir daüber berichtet haben und die Hintermänner enttarnt haben, verleumden uns die Ostberliner Nachrichtendienstler von “GoMoPa”, mit den fingierten und nicht existenten Tarn-Potemkin-Figuren Goldman, Morgenstern und Partner, ganz im Stile der Stasi – ohne den Hauch eines Beweises, wie sie es auch bereits in Sachen Wirecard getan haben. Auch hier ermitteln die Staatsanwälte gegen “GoMoPa”.
Zahlreiche Verurteilungen und Strafanzeigen liegen gegen “GoMoPa” vor unter anderem diese ST/0148943/2011
Unter den zahlreichen Opfern befinden sich diese Personen und Firmen: Wirecard, Dipl.-Ing. Paul Bösel, Andreas Decker, Herbert Ernst Meridian Capital, DieErstemai GmbH, Oliver Schwertner, Ekrem Redzepagic, DKB, Teldafax, Express Kurier Europa, Bernd Pulch und Martin Sachs und Hunderte mehr.
Die “GoMoPa”-Opfer sagen übereinstimmend: “Hinter “GoMoPa” stehen die “Anlegerschutzanwälte” Jochen und Manfred Resch, Berlin, die durch negative Presseberichte Personen und Firmen gefügig machen wollen. Gegründet wurde “GoMoPa” von dem Stasi-Oberst Ehrenfried Stelzer, der jahrelang eng mit Jochen Resch zusammenarbeitete.”
Wie “GoMoPa”-Agent Klaus Maurischat (wenn der Name überhaupt stimmt) mich erpressen wollte, lesen Sie en detail weiter unten.
Herzlichst Ihr
Magister Bernd Pulch
„Sicher nein“, werden Sie jetzt sagen und fragen: „Wer behauptet diesen staatszersetzenden Schwachsinn ?“
„Fonds & Friends-Herausgeber“ Peter Ehlers (wenn der Name stimmt ?) und der Ost-Berliner NACHRICHTENDIENST” “GoMoPa” bezeichneten die deutsche Bundeskanzlerin Angela Merkel und den deutschen Bundes-Finanzminister Wolfgang Schäuble als “kriminelle Hehler” und als Deutschlands „bekannteste Hehler“.
Original-Zitat Peter Ehlers (wenn denn wengistens der Name stimmt, was viele Opfer von “Peter Ehlers” bezweifeln) :
„Wolfgang Schäuble, Finanzminister unter Kanzlerin Angela Merkel. Beide sind sich nicht immer einig. Jetzt schon: Sie wollen als Staat, von deutschen Steuergeldern bezahlt, ein neues staatliches Geschäft eröffnen: Hehlerei.
Peter Ehlers,
Herausgeber DAS INVESTMENT
Ein Kommentar von Peter Ehlers, Herausgeber DAS INVESTMENT
Ein durchaus einträgliches Geschäft, das nur einen Haken hat: Es ist illegal. Schäuble hat dafür eine lustige Rechtsauffassung: Er sieht den Deal, den der damalige Finanzminister Peer Steinbrück („das beste Geschäft meines Lebens“) machte, für sich als Rechtfertigung. Frei nach dem billigen Motto: Wenn mein Vorgänger kriminell war, darf ich das ja wohl auch sein.“
Das heisst nicht nur Schäuble handelt illegal und kriminell – im ganz grossen Stil, sondern auch die Vorgänger Ex-Bundes-Finanzminister Peer Steinbrück und Ex-Bundeskanzler Gerhard Schröder und die Bundeskanzlerin Angela Merkel sowieso.
Da komme ich ja noch gut weg:
Mich bezeichnet Peter Ehlers (wenn denn wengistens der Name stimmt ?) als “Internet-Terroristen”, „Erpresser“, „Gewohnheitsverbrecher“ und „Idioten“, ach ja meinen akademischen Titel Magister Artium täusche ich auch vor, sagen Peter Ehlers und GoMoPa, unisono. All das im “renommierten” “Scheisshausfliegen-Blog” und der “renommierten” Webseite “GoMoPa” der Urmutter aller “Scheisshausfliegen-Blogs” dieser Welt des wegen Anlagebetruges an seinem eigenen Anleger einschlägig vorbestraften Klaus Maurischat Aktenzeichen 28 Ls 85/05.
Dies ist bezeichnet für die psychotische Wahnwelt dieser mutmasslich kommunistischen Delinquenten aus dem Osten Deutschlands und nur die Spitze des schmutzigen Eisberges.
Zum hier aktuell vorliegenden Tatbestand:
Im deutschen Strafrecht ist die Beamtenbeleidigung kein eigener Tatbestand. Ein Beamter ist hier nicht anders gestellt als ein anderer Bürger. Es handelt sich also um eine „normale“ Beleidigung gemäß § 185StGB.
Dennoch gibt es bei der Beleidigung eines Amtsträgers, der nicht zwingend Beamter sein muss, eine verfahrensrechtliche Besonderheit: Während die Straftat grundsätzlich nur auf Antrag des Verletzten verfolgt wird, kann gemäß § 194 Abs. 3 StGB bei Amtsträgern auch der Dienstvorgesetzte des Beleidigten den Strafantrag stellen:
„Ist die Beleidigung gegen einen Amtsträger, einen für den öffentlichen Dienst besonders Verpflichteten oder einen Soldaten der Bundeswehr während der Ausübung seines Dienstes oder in Beziehung auf seinen Dienst begangen, so wird sie auch auf Antrag des Dienstvorgesetzten verfolgt. Richtet sich die Tat gegen eine Behörde oder eine sonstige Stelle, die Aufgaben der öffentlichen Verwaltung wahrnimmt, so wird sie auf Antrag des Behördenleiters oder des Leiters der aufsichtführenden Behörde verfolgt. Dasselbe gilt für Träger von Ämtern und für Behörden der Kirchen und anderen Religionsgesellschaften des öffentlichen Rechts.“
Außerdem wird von der Staatsanwaltschaft in der Regel das öffentliche Interesse an der Strafverfolgung bejaht, so dass es weitaus seltener zur Verweisung auf den Privatklageweg oder zur Einstellung des Verfahrens nach § 153, 153a StPO kommt.
In der Praxis zieht die Beleidigung vor allem von (Polizei-)Beamten meist Geldstrafen nach sich. Bei mehrfach wegen solcher Delikte vorbestraften Personen sind in der Praxis schon kurze Freiheitsstrafen von z. B. 3 Monaten ohne Bewährung vorgekommen.
Fallbeispiel:
Beleidigung von Amtsträgern”Prozesse-Dieter” verurteilt
“Prozesse-Dieter”, prozessfreudiger Sozialhilfeempfänger aus Ratingen, ist zu einem Jahr Haft verurteilt worden. Das Amtsgericht in Ratingen bei Düsseldorf sprach den als “König der Kläger” bekannt gewordenen ehemaligen 73-jährigen Sportlehrer wegen 44 Beleidigungen von Amtsträgern wie Beamten, Richtern und Rechtspflegern schuldig.
Per Postkarten hatte sie der Senior mit Fäkalausdrücken überzogen. Das Gericht setzte sich über den psychiatrischen Gutachter hinweg, der den Angeklagten als schuldunfähig eingestuft hatte, weil dieser an einer paranoiden Persönlichkeitsstörung leide.
Dies trifft möglicherweise auch auf die Delinquenten Peter Ehlers/”GoMoPa” zu.
„Die Festnahme des Herrn Klaus Maurischat ist ein ausschlaggebender Moment, anders gesagt eine „Wende um 180 Grad” für ihn persönlich. Es bedeutet aber auch den „Anfang vom Ende“ für seine Mitarbeiter, für die Internetservices, Bloggers, die mit GOMOPA so gerne und ohne Widerspruch zusammengearbeitet hatten. Es unterliegt keinem Zweifel, dass die Festnahme von Herrn Klaus Maurischat nur die Spitze des „Eisbergs” ist“, so Meridian Capital, die von Maurischat und GoMoPa erpresst worden sind.
Siehe: http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:8jmni-h2e_4J:www.maurischatinhaft.wordpress.com/+verhaftung+klaus+maurischat&cd=2&hl=de&ct=clnk&gl=de&source=www.google.de
Klaus-Dieter Maurischat hat nach Angaben von Meridian Capital bereits 23 Gerichtsurteile wegen einschlägiger Vergehen und ist im Gegensatz zu seinen Cyber-Opfern tatsächlich vorbestraft (zum Beispiel: Krefeld vom 24. April 2006; AZ: 28 Ls 85/05) siehe http://sjb-fonds-opfer.com/?page_id=11764.
„Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. London, seit Jahren im Kampf gegen den Cyber-Terrorismus aktiv, enthüllt neue kriminelle Erscheinungen im Netz
Die Lage ändert sich auch dank wirksamen Schritten und der erfolgreichen Zusammenarbeit der Firma Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. mit der internationalen Polizei Interpol, mit der Bundesagentur (FBI) in den USA, mit der BUNDESKRIMINALPOLIZEI in Deutschland, mit SCOTLAND YARD in Großbritannien, sowie mit dem Russischen Geheimdienst FSB.
Die Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. – gemeinsam mit weiteren Firmen und Kooperationen, die zu Opfer krimineller Aktivitäten des Netzverbrechens gefallen sind – hat unbestreitbar schon erste Erfolge zu verzeichnen.
Dass im November 2008 auf dem Territorium der Bundesrepublik Deutschland der oben erwähnte Anführer und „Gehirn“ der Firma GOMOPA, Herr Klaus Maurishat festgenommen wurde, darf nicht außer Acht gelassen werden. Aus den derMeridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. zur Verfügung stehenden Informationen resultiert eindeutig, dass die nächsten Verhaftungen der an diesem Prozedere teilnehmenden Personen in solchen Ländern wie: Österreich, die Schweiz, Russland, die Ukraine, Polen, Spanien, Mexiko, Portugal, Brasilien, die USA, Kanada, Großbritannien, Irland, Australien, New Seeland und in a. erfolgen.
Das oberste Ziel der Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. sowie der weiteren Opfer des Verbrechens im Netz ist es, alle Teilnehmer dieses kriminellen Prozedere vor das zuständige Gericht zu führen.
Alle Berufs- und Justizpersonen, unabhängig vom Sitz und der ausgeübten Geschäftstätigkeit, welche dem oben beschriebenen kriminellen Vorgehen (Betrug, Erpressung) zu Opfer gefallen sind, können der von der Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. geführten Kompanie beitreten, die sich zum Ziel setzt, alle an dem an dieser Stelle dargestellten Prozedere Mitbeteiligten aus dem öffentlichen sowie dem wirtschaftlichen Leben auszuschließen.
II. Schwarze Liste mit internationalen Erpressern und Betrügern sowie Ihre Methoden (opus operandi) in den folgenden Ländern:
1. Die Bundesrepublik Deutschland
2. Dubai
3. Russland
1. Die Bundesrepublik Deutschland
GOMOPA GmbH, Goldman Morgenstern & Partners LLC., Goldman Morgenstern & Partners Consulting LLC, Wottle Inkasso Büro. In diesen Firmen sind folgende Personen recht aktiv:
– Klaus Maurischat („Vater” und „Gehirn” der kriminellen Organisation, der für den unzählige rechtskräftige Urteile zu verzeichnen sind (festgenommen in Deutschland im November 2008);
– Rudolf Josef Heckel („rechte Hand” bei Herrn Klaus Maurischat, ehemaliger denunzierter Banker, der an vielen maßlosen Bankschmuggeleien mitbeteiligt war. (Heutzutage persona non grata im deutschen Bankwesen);
– Peter Reski (zuständig für das Finanzwesen, bekannt für Betrug, Fälschungen und Steuerunterschlagungen, hinter denen bereits rechtkräftige Urteile stehen);
– Mark Vornkahl (zuständig für organisatorisch-administrative Aufgaben beiGOMOPA, ehemaliger Polizeibeamter, entlassen wegen zahlreichem Verstießen im Dienst, hat bereits ein paar rechtskräftige Urteile „auf seinem Konto“);
– Claus i Ulrike Wottle (Ehepaar, für das sogenannte „unkonventionelle” Vollstrecken der Schulden vor allem zugunsten GOMOPA. Dieser Vollstreckung lagen Erzwingung, Erpressung mit Gewalt zugrunde, die auf sowohl tatsachliche als auch fiktive Schulden Bezug nahmen?
Wie funktioniert das System von GOMOPA
Die oben in Kurze erwähnten Personen, sowie die mit dem Service GOMOPAKooperierenden, so genannte „GOMOPA-Experten“, Bloggers und alle weiteren Berufs-und Justizpersonen suchen sich aus allen möglichen Quellen Informationen über große, reichen Firmen und Korporationen aus, welche in verschiedenen heimischen und internationalen Wirtschaftszweigen tätig sind. Dem Service GOMOPA liegt besonders daran, dass man diejenigen aussucht, die „in Sich selbst ins Auge fallen”. Diejenigen Firmen und Korporationen also, gegen die relativ einfach und ohne großen Aufwand sich Vorwürfe, Unstimmigkeiten u. s. w. sich machen lassen, in bezug auf die sogar Straftaten wie Erschwindeln und Betrügen u. a. sich leicht vorführen lassen. Es ist allgemein bekannt, dass jeder Firma besonders an ihrer guten Präsenz und an ihrem unantastbaren Namen liegt. Jedes Unternehmen wird dem entsprechend alles tun, um ihre gute Präsenz also auch ihre Glaubwürdigkeit beibehalten zu können. Wenn aber zum Opfer des GOMOPA und seiner „Partner” ein großes und reiches Unternehmen fällt, so kann man sich an solchen Unternehmen schnell, einfach und sogar beachtlich bereichern.
Es taucht an dieser Stelle die Frage auf:
Welcher schlaue Straftäter, der im Netz und außerhalb des Netzes mir Erfolg wirkt, möchte daraus kein Nutzen ziehen?
Die Kriminellen im Netz wissen genau, dass ohne geschäftliche Glaubwürdigkeit kein Vertrauen vorhanden sei, welches jeder Geschäftstätigkeit unentbehrlich ist. GOMOPAsowie alle mit dem Kooperierenden haben mit Sicherheit alle möglichen Methoden und Maßnahmen beherrscht, wie man Glaubwürdigkeit und Vertrauen einer Firma, eines Unternehmens, einer Korporation (Verbrechensopfer) in Frage stellt.
Dies zieht eben die Aufmerksamkeit der User an, so dass die Homepage des GOMOPAwww.gomopa.net in den Suchmaschinen wie Google, Yahoo leicht auffindbar ist. Dies wiederum bedeutet nichts anderes als Zusatzprofite für das Service GOMOPA , weil um seine Tätigkeit herum ein mediales Diskurs geschaffen wird.
Ein auf den ersten Blick banales und einfaches Opfer der Erpressung kann beispielsweise eine öffentliche, staatliche Instanz, welche auf Basis der öffentlichen Glaubwürdigkeit funktioniert, werden, wie eine Bank oder ein bankfremdes Finanzinstitut. So war es eben mit dem bankfremden, internationalen FinanzinstitutMeridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. der Fall.
Ein einfaches und leichtes Opfer de illegalen und materiellen Gewinns können auch die Versicherungsgesellschaften werden, bei denen – wie es aus unseren Recherchen resultiert-, vieles auf die kriminelle Tätigkeit des GOMOPA vor allem auf dem Gebiet der Bundesrepublik Deutschland, der Schweiz und Österreich zurückzuführen sei. Unter den bekannten und erkennbaren Opfern sind mit Sicherheit deutsche, österreichische und schweizerische Banken, Versicherungsgesellschaften wie z.B. Allianz aus Deutschland, deutsche und österreichische Firmen wie HDI und DKV sichtbar.
Dies, wozu sich das Service GOMOPA traut und was die mit dem kooperierenden Services, Blogs heutzutage praktizieren, ist das so genannte Cyber-Stalking, welches sich rasant im Netz verbreitet. Die kriminelle Methode besteht an dieser Stelle u. a. im Bedrohen, dass über die Geschäftstätigkeit eines Unternehmens (Ofer der Erpressung, Erzwingung und Bedrohung) fiktive, gar nicht existierende Informationen (Lügen, Gerüchte, Geschichtchen, Nachrede, Beleidigungen) zuerst im Netz dann in anderen Massenmedien veröffentlicht werden. Dies dient lediglich dazu, um ein potenzielles Opfer dazu zu bewegen, eine beachtliche Geldsumme für die so genannte „Ruhe“ dem Erpresser bereitzustellen. Die „Ruhe” bedeutet hier das Versprechen einer Zugangssperre in Bezug auf die Veröffentlichung jeglicher fiktiven Information im Netz und in allen weiteren Massenmedien, die die Opfer der Erpressung im äußerst negativen Licht darstellen kann.
Derartige Bedrohungen setzen sich, wie bereits oben erwähnt zum Ziel, Firmen – potenzielle Opfer des Cyber-Stalking dazu zu veranlassen, dass sie sich selbst „aufkaufen“. Kurz gesagt, GOMOPA und seinesgleichen, sowie die mit denen kooperierenden Services und Blogs, kreieren eine „virtuelle Wirklichkeit”, oder anders gesagt, publizieren fiktive Informationen über potenzielle Opfer eines Verbrechens. Firmen und Korporationen, welche gegen Bedrohung und Erpressung seitens GOMOPAnicht fällig sind, diejenigen also, welche für so genannte „Ruhe“ nicht zahlen wollen, werden zum Opfern schwerwiegender Lügen, Beleidigungen, Insinuationen und anderer krimineller Unterschlagungen, die Aussehen und Präsenz einer Firma mit Sicherheit beeinträchtigen.
Eines gilt als Ziel des GOMOPA, nämlich so schnell und so einfach, wie es geht, das Geld abzukassieren, und wenn sich eine Firma weigert und sich die „Ruhe“ nicht kaufen möchte, wird sie unerwartet und blitzschnell zum Objekt der Erpressung und Beleidigung im Netz.
An dieser Stelle taucht folgende Frage auf: Wie ist es möglich, dass der Anführer der Firma GOMOPA, Herr Klaus Maurischat, der nur in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland auf seinem „Konto” 23 Gerichtsurteile hat, sich jahrelang als einen ehrlichen Bürger kreieren, zugleich anderen Personen, Firmen, Korporationen verbrecherische Taten, Delikte einprägen, dazu noch daran beachtliche Geldsummen verdienen konnte? Dieses komplexe Prozedere kann nur folgendermaßen erklärt werden:
GOMOPA kreiert sein Aussehen, seine Präsenz in den Augen der öffentlichen Meinung als ein ehrliches Subjekt, welches gegen pathologische Erscheinungen des öffentlichen und wirtschaftlichen Alltags einschreitet. GOMOPA und seine Partner (Services, Blogs) stellen sich als Verfolger jeglicher Verbrechensart dar, versprechen also den Kampf gegen jeden virtuellen Verbrecher im Netz (insbesondere gegen jeden Betrüger, Erpresser). GOMOPA verwendet in dieser Hinsicht eine Art „Merketingsvorhang” als Methode der Verführung, infolge dessen es sein wahres „Antlitz“ und seine wahren Intentionen als die eines Betrügers und Erpressers aufs Geld verbergen kann. Die wahren Absichten des GOMOPA, der mit GOMOPA zusammen arbeitenden Services und Blogs konnten bis heute zweifelsohne mit Erfolg vor der öffentlichen Meinung versteckt bleiben, vor allem dank des so genannten „Rauchvorhangs“, welcher sich darin widerspiegelt, dass man sich selbst als „Sieger“ jeglichen Missbrauchs und jeder pathologischen Erscheinung des öffentlichen und wirtschaftlichen Lebens in Deutschaland, Österreich, der Schweiz, den USA, Großbritannien, Russland, Spanien kreiert.
Als nächstes taucht die von dem GOMOPA vorgeschobene Person auf, welche Firmen und Korporationen – die künftigen Opfer des Verbrechens also – vor der Möglichkeit der Veröffentlichung von äußerst ungünstigen und das betroffene Unternehmen in einem negativen Licht darstellenden Informationen im Internet und in weiteren Massenmedien warnt. Die Person, von der hier die Rede ist, informiert zugleich, dass sie sich mit Erfolg gegen so ein Prozedere für ein entsprechendes „Honorar“ einsetzen kann. Der GOMOPA geht es an dieser Stelle um die Erpressung aufs Geld für so genannte „Ruhe” um die Firma und Korporation (Opfer eines Verbrechens) herum. Meistens wird seitens der betroffenen Firmen auf solche Bedrohungen überhaupt nicht reagiert, weil sie zu ihrem Alltag und ihrer Tagesordnung gehören. Es fehlt schließlich kaum an Erpressern im Netz und außerhalb des Mediums. Normalerweise kommt es also selten zu so genannter „Verständigung”, wobei auf der einen Seite die Verbrechensopfer, auf der anderen Seite das GOMOPA auftritt. Es ist verständlich, dass der Preis für so eine „Verständigung” die Bereitstellung der von dem GOMOPA geforderten Gelder wäre. Die finanzielle Erpressung wird in dieser Etappe selten vollzogen. Die Lage ändert sich jedoch kaum, wenn die Firmen und Korporationen (Verbrechensopfer) erfahren, dass die Bedrohung erfüllt sei. In Kurze erscheinen auf der Homepage http://www.gomopa.netzahlreiche Presseartikel, Schein-berichte und Pseudomarktanalysen, die sowohl durchGOMOPA als auch durch so genannte „unabhängige Experten“ firmiert und vertreten werden, die mit GOMOPA formal oder fiktiv zusammenarbeiten. Informationen, hier publiziert, entsprechen den Inhalten aus einer Bedrohung und stellen die Geschäftstätigkeit der Personen, Firmen und Korporationen in einem äußerst negativen Licht dar.
Es unterliegt keinem Zweifel, dass derartige Maßnahmen und Methoden bloß auf Beeinträchtigung des guten Namens und der guten Präsenz dieser Firmen und Korporationen abzielen.
Die Tätigkeit von GOMOPA ist damit mit Sicherheit nicht ausgeschöpft. GOMOPAverbreitet (publiziert, unterbringt) die oben dargestellten Informationen im Netz, indem es sich der glaubwürdigen, populären und meinungsbildenden Services bedient. Mehr noch, GOMOPA droht den Firmen und Korporationen (seinen Opfern), dass die „aus dem Finger gezogenen“ Informationen nicht nur im Netz, sondern auch im Fernsehen und im Radio und in der Presselandschaft erscheinen.
Wie die Erfahrung und das bisherige Fachwissen der Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. zeigen, sind sich die Services meistens nicht dessen bewusst, dass sie zum Zwecke eines kriminellen Vorgehens durch das GOMOPA genutzt werden. Sie stimmen dem entsprechend mit den fiktiven Publikationen, Berichten und Analysen überein, welche speziell durch GOMOPA sowie durch „unabhängige“ Experten präpariert sind.
Es kommt auch vor, dass die Services und Blogs einer derartigen Zusammenarbeit mit dem GOMOPA Zustimmung erteilen, wobei sie genau wissen, dass die von GOMOPAübermittelten Informationen fiktiv sind und die Glaubwürdigkeit der Firmen und Korporationen beeinträchtigen. Sie nehmen also bewusst an dem kriminellen Prozedere teil. Die Erklärung dieser Lage ist recht einfach. GOMOPA zahlt nämlich den Services und Blogs entsprechende Vergütung, dass sie der Veröffentlichung von unwahren Informationen über die Firmen und Korporationen (Verbrechensopfer) zustimmen.
Einige Services und Blogs scheinen nichts davon gewusst zu haben, dass die auf ihren Seiten zur Verfügung gestellten Informationen „fiktiv“ und „aus dem Finger gezogen“ sind. Sie suchen auf diese Art und Weise ihre Verhaltensweise zu rechtfertigen, denn sie wollen den rechtlichen Konsequenzen wegen der Teilnahme am Missbrauch des guten Namens und Aussehens einer Firma oder Korporation entkommen.
Das Tätigkeitssystem von GOMOPA, von zusammenarbeitenden Services und Blogs wurde auch am Beispiel der Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. ausgetestet.
Anfang Oktober 2008 erhielt einer der Arbeiter der Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. eine Meldung von einem anonymen Sender, dass in naher Zukunft – zuerst im Internet, dann im Fernsehen, im Radio und in der deutschen Presse – Informationen erscheinen, die die Funktionsweise und Tätigkeiten der Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. in einem äußerst negativen Licht darstellen. Der Mitarbeiter derMeridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. wurde also informiert, dass diese Meldungen/Nachrichten zweifelsohne deutlich das Aussehen und den guten Ruf der Firma Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. beeinträchtigen.
Der an dieser Stelle erwähnte „Gesprächspartner” hat den Angestellten der Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. informiert, dass die Möglichkeit besteht die peinliche Situation zu vermeiden, indem die Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. auf das von der Person gezeigte Konto die Summe von 100.000,00 EUR überweist. Wie sich aber später zeigte, war der Herr Klaus Maurischat – dieser anonyme Gesprächspartner – „Gehirn“ und „Lider desGOMOPA“. Die Ermittlungen wurden angestellt durch die Bundeskriminalpolizei(Verfolgungs- und Ermittlungsorgan auf der Bundesebene) während des Ermittlungsverfahrens wegen einer finanziellen Erpressung, Betrügereien auch wegen der Bedrohungen, welche von Herrn Maurischat und seinen Mitarbeiter praktiziert wurden und werden sowie wegen Teilnahme anderer (Leiter der Internetservices und Moderatoren der Blogs) an diesem Prozedere. Diese Straftaten wurden begangen zu Schaden vieler Berufs- und Justizpersonen, darunter auch der Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. Die Opfer dieses Verbrechens sind in Deutschland, Österreich, der Schweiz, Spanien, Portugal, Großbritannien, den USA und Kanada sichtbar.
In diesem Moment taucht folgende Frage auf: Wie war die Reaktion der Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. auf die Forderungen seitens GOMOPA? Entsprach die Reaktion den Erwartungen von GOMOPA? Hat die Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. die geforderte Summe 100.000,00 EUR überwiesen?
Seites der Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. gab es überhaupt keine Reaktion auf den Erpressungsversuch von GOMOPA. Ende August 2008 auf dem Service http://www.gompa.net sind zahlreiche Artikel/Meldungen erscheinen, welche die Tätigkeit derMeridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. in einem sehr negativen Licht dargestellt haben. Nachdem die auf http://www.gomopa.net enthaltenen Informationen ausführlich und vollständig analysiert worden waren, ergab es sich, dass sie der Wahrheit nicht einmal in einem Punkt entsprechen und potenzielle und bereits bestehende Kunden derMeridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. in Bezug auf die von diesem Finanzinstitut geführten Geschäftstätigkeit irreführen. Infolge der kriminellen Handlugen von GOMOPA und der mit ihm kooperierenden Services und Blogs im Netz hat die Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. beachtliche und messbare geschäftliche Verluste erlitten. Die Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. hat nämlich in erster Linie eine wichtige Gruppe von potenziellen Kunden verloren. Was sich aber als wichtiger erwies, es haben sich die bisherigen Kunden von der Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. kaum abgewandt. Diejenigen Kunden haben unsere Dienstleitungen weiterhin genutzt und nutzen diese immer noch. In Hinblick auf die bisherige Zusammenarbeit mit der Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd., werden ihrerseits dem entsprechend keine Einwände erhoben .
GOMOPA hat so einen Verlauf der Ereignisse genau prognostiziert, dessen Ziel beachtliche und messbare geschäftliche durch die Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.erlittene Verluste waren. Der Verlauf der Ereignisse hat GOMOPA mit Sicherheit gefreut. GOMOPA hat nämlich darmit gerechnet, dass die Markt-Stellung derMeridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. nachlässt und das Finanzinstitut die geforderte Summe (100.000,00 EUR) bereitstellt. Im Laufe der Zeit, als das ganze Prozedere im Netz immer populärer war, versuchte GOMOPA noch vier mal zu der Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. Kontakte aufzunehmen, indem es jedes mal das Einstellen dieser kriminellen „Kampagne” versprochen hat, wobei es jedes mal seine finanziellen Forderungen heraufsetzte. Die letzte für das Einstellen der „Kampagne“ gegen dieMeridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. vorgesehene Quote betrug sogar 5.000.000,00 EUR (in Worten: fünf Milionen EURO). Die Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.konnte sich aber trotz der sich ständig steigenden Forderungen seitens GOMOPA im Markt behaupten.
Im Oktober 2008 traf die Leitung der Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.Entscheidung über die Benachrichtigung der Internationalen Polizei INTERPOL sowie entsprechender Strafverfolgungsorgane der BRD (die Polizei und die Staatsanwaltschaft) über den bestehenden Sachverhalt. In der Zwischenzeit meldeten sich bei der Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. zahlreiche Firmen und Korporationen, sogar Berufsperson wie Ärzte, Richter, Priester, Schauspieler und anderen Personen aus unterschiedlichen Ländern der Welt, die der Erpressung von GOMOPA nachgegeben und die geforderten Geldsummen überwiesen haben. Diese Personen gaben bereits Erklärungen ab, dass sie dies getan haben, damit man sie bloß endlich „in Ruhe lässt” und um unnötige Probleme, Schwierigkeiten und einen kaum begründbaren Ausklang vermeiden zu können. Die Opfer dieses kriminellen Vorgehens haben die Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. über unterschiedliche Geldsummen, welche verlangt wurden, informiert.
In einem Fall gab es verhältnismäßig kleine (um ein paar tausend EURO), in einem anderen Fall handelte es schon um beachtliche Summen (rund um paar Millionen EURO).
Zusätzlich wendeten sich an die Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. Firmen, welche der GOMOPA noch keine „Gebühr” überweisen haben und bereits überlegen, ob sie dies tun sollen, oder nicht. Diese Firmen erwarteten von der Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. eine klare Stellungnahme sowie eine professionelle praktische Beratung, wie man sich in solch einer Lage verhalten soll und wie man diese Geldforderungen umgehen kann. Die Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. hat ausnahmslos allen Verbrechensopfern, welche sich bei unserer Firma gemeldet haben, eine Zusammenarbeit vorgeschlagen. Als oberste Aufgabe stellt sich diese Kooperation, gemeinsam entschlossene und wirksame Maßnahmen gegen GOMOPA, gegen andere Services im Netz sowie gegen alle Bloggers zu treffen, die an dem hier beschriebenen internationalen kriminellen Vorgehen mit GOMOPA-Führung teilnehmen.
Alle diese Firmen traten einem so genannten von der Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. vorgeschlagenen „Kreuzzug” gegen GOMOPA, seine Partner bei. Auf unsere Bitte benachrichtigten alle mitbeteiligten Firmen die Internationale Polizei INTERPOL sowie ihre heimischen Verfolgungsorgane, u. a. die zuständige Staatsanwaltschaft und die Polizeibehörden über den bestehenden Sachverhalt.
In Hinblick auf die Tatsache, dass das verbrecherische Handeln von GOMOPA sich über viele Staaten erstreckte und dass die Anzahl der in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland erstatteten Anzeigen wegen der durch GOMOPA, Internetservices und Bloggers begangenen Straftaten, rasant wuchs – was zweifelsohne von einer weit gehenden kriminellen Wirkungskraft des GOMOPA zeugt – schlug die Internationale Wirtschaftspolizei INTERPOL der Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. vor, dass sich ihr Vertreter in Berlin mit dem Vertreter von GOMOPA trifft, um die „Zahlungsmodalitäten“ und Überweisung der Summe von 5.000.000,00 EUR zu besprechen. Dieser Schritt sollte, eine gut durchdachte und durch dieBundeskriminalpolizei organisierte Falle durchzuführen, deren Ziel die Festnahme der unter GOMOPA wirkenden internationalen Straftäter war.
Die koordinierten Schritte und Maßnahmen der Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.und anderer Beschädigter, geleitet von der Internationalen Wirtschaftspolizei INTERPOL, dem Bundeskriminalamt und der Staatsanwaltschaft der Bundesrepublik Deutschland haben zur Aus-, Einarbeitung und Durchführung der oben beschriebenen Falle beigetragen. Im November 2008 führte die in Berlin vorbereitete Falle zur Festnahme und Verhaftung des Vertreters des GOMOPA, der nach der Festnahme auf Herrn Klaus Maurichat – als den Hauptverantwortlichen und Anführer der internationalen kriminellen Gruppe GOMOPA verwies. Der Festgenommene benannte und zeigte der Bundeskriminalpolizei zugleich den aktuellen Aufenthaltsort des Herrn Klaus Maurischat. „Gehirn“ und Gründer dieser internationalen kriminellen Gruppe GOMOPA. Herr Klaus Maurischat wurde am selben Tag auch festgenommen und auf Frist verhaftet, wird bald in Anklagezustand gestellt, wird die Verantwortung für eigene Straftaten und die des Forums GOMOPA vor einem zuständigen Bundesgericht tragen. Die Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. unternahm bereits alle möglichen Schritte, damit Herr Klaus Maurischat auch auf der Anklagebank des zuständigen Gerichts des Vereinigten Königsreiches Großbritannien erscheint. Unter den beschädigten Berufs- und Justizpersonen aus Großbritannien, neben der Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. gibt es noch viele Opfer von GOMOPA:
Der Begin der Verhaftungen mit so einem Ausmaß bedeutet für die deutsche Justiz einen ausschlaggebenden und bahnbrechenden Punkt. Bemerkenswert ist, dass die Verfolgungsorgane der Bundesrepublik sich bis zu diesem Zeitpunkt der langjährigen kriminellen Tätigkeit des Herrn Klaus Maurischat und seiner Mitarbeiter machtlos zeigten.
Die langdauernde Straflosigkeit des kriminellen Vorgehens des Herrn Klaus Maurischat, der jahrelang die „Erste Geige” bei GOMOPA spielte, ist zu Ende gegangen.
An dieser Stelle taucht noch eine Frage auf: wie wird’s weiter gehen?
Die Festnahme des Herrn Klaus Maurischat ist ein ausschlaggebender Moment, anders gesagt eine „Wende um 180 Grad” für ihn persönlich. Es bedeutet aber auch den „Anfang vom Ende“ für seine Mitarbeiter, für die Internetservices, Bloggers, die mit GOMOPA so gerne und ohne Widerspruch zusammengearbeitet hatten. Es unterliegt keinem Zweifel, dass die Sache vom Herrn Klaus Maurischat an der Spitze des „Eisbergs” steht. Der oben erwähnte Wendepunkt zu dieser Frage wird weitere Festnahmen und Verhaftungen der GOMOPA-Mitglieder mit sich bringen, sowie aller Personen aus allen möglichen Gebieten, die an diesem grenzüberschreitenden kriminellen Vorgehen teilgenommen haben.
Aus Informationen, welche der Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. vorliegen, resultiert, dass die nächsten Festnahmen aktuell vorbreitet werden, die mit dem Services GOMOPA zusammenarbeitende Personen betreffen. Dies wird auf Personen außerhalb Deutschland – von wo der Herr Klaus Maurischat kommt – bezug nehmen. Die Einzelheiten dürfen an dieser Stelle in Hinblick auf Rechtsgut und Verlauf der durch die Verfolgungsorgane der BRG und der INTERPOL geführten Untersuchung leider nicht verraten werden.
Die Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. kann momentan lediglich eine verbindliche Information aus der geführten Untersuchung der Öffentlichkeit bekannt geben, die die strafrechtliche Haftung nicht zu Folge haben wird.
In diesem Moment also werden intensive Vorbereitungen auf Verhaftung einer Reihe von Personen außerhalb der Bundesrepublik Deutschland getroffen.
Dies betrifft insbesondere folgende Länder wie:
– Russische Föderation
– die Ukraine
– Polen
– Spanien
– Mexiko
– Portugal
– Brasilien
– die Vereinigten Staaten von Amerika
– Kanada
– Großbritannien
– Irland
– Australien
– New Seeland
– Indien.
Alle Berufs- und Justizpersonen, unabhängig vom Land, in dem sie das Amt begleiten, oder dessen Bürger sind, und die bis jetzt bewusst oder unbewusst mit dem Forum GOMOPA zusammengearbeitet haben, oder weiterhin zusammenarbeiten, erregen den Verdacht der Internationalen Polizei INTERPOL. Diese Polizei arbeitet mit der Kriminalpolizei in jedem Land, um die oben erwähnten Personen zuerst identifizieren und dann die juristisch verfolgen zu können.
Informationen zu diesem Thema, sowie über Anfang und Ende der Tätigkeit des GOMOPA kann man unter folgenden Adressen im Netz lesen:
– http://antigomopa.net/de/
– http://gomopaabzocker.wordpress.com/
– http://www.nepper-schlepper-bauernfaenger.com
– http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qNpzAu-QMuE
– http://www.korte.de/alexander/2006/01/gomopa-finanforum-kritik.html
– http://evelux.de/gomopa-sam-240/
– http://blog.deobald.org/archive/2007/07/01/betrugsvorwurf-gomopa-spam/
2. Dubai
KLP Group Emirates – Vereinigte Arabische Emiraten. Als Chef der Firma gilt HerrMartin Kraeter, der nicht nur als „Gehirn” des ganzen Unternehmens, sondern auch als langjähriger Freund des Herrn Klaus Maurischat (GOMOPA-Leiter) fungiert.
Diese Firma will nicht einmal verbergen und gibt offiziell zu, dass sie als strategischer Partner des GOMOPA auf dem Gebiet des Nahen Ostens, dem entsprechend das Gebiet der Persischen Küste tätig ist.
Die offizielle Tätigkeit der Firma KLP Group Emirates umfasst unter anderem folgende Bereiche: Finanzberatung auch aus dem Off-Shore Bereich (Management Services – Facilitators – OffshoreConsultants, International Tax & Legal Consultants – Fiduciaries). Im Tätigkeitsbereich der Firma kommt auch die Gründung von Firmen und Unternehmen in den so genannten „Steuerparadiesen” vor, um der Steuerpflicht zu entfliehen.
Die inoffizielle Tätigkeit der Firma KLP Group Emirates umfasst unter anderem die Zusammenarbeit mit dem Service GOMOPA im Bereich der „Geldwäsche”. Die Gelder werden infolge der kriminellen Handlungen durch GOMOPA generiert, durch vorgeschobene Berufs- und Justizpersonen demnächst über die ganze Welt verbreitet und legalisiert.
Die auf die Gesetzwidrigkeit beruhende Tätigkeit der Firma KLP Group Emirates sowie die Kooperation mit dem Services GOMOPA erregten Aufmerksamkeit auch bei den Verfolgungsorganen des Vereinigten Königreiches Großbritannien, vor allem bei Scotland Yard, das zu dieser Frage ein intensives Ermittlungsverfahren eingeleitet hat, welches sich in der „Entwicklungsphase“ befindet. Es muss angemerkt werden, dass alle Berufs- und Justizpersonen, vor allem aber die Kunden der Firma KLP Group Emirates, die mit der Firma KLP Group Emirates in Vergangenheit zusammengearbeitet haben und dies immer noch tun, unter die „Luppe“ des Scotland Yard genommen werden.
3. Russland
a) Die Firma E-xecutive wird von dem Herrn Vilen Novosartow geleitet. Die auf der Homepage der Firma enthaltenen Informationen kommen direkt von der FirmaGOMOPA. Die Firma E-xecutive führt die enge Zusammenarbeit nicht nur mitGOMOPA, sondern auch mit einer weiteren auf dem russischen Gebiet unter dem Namen OOO VK Broker funktionierenden Firma. Die Firma E-xecutive im Zusammenhang mit der Firma OOO VK Broker ist Mitglied einer kriminellen Gruppe unter der Leitung von GOMOPA. Die Firma E-xecutive vertritt Interessen von GOMOPA in Russland und in Mittel- und Osteuropa.
Inoffiziell beschäftigt sich die Firma E-xecutive insbesondere mit der Suche nach potenziellen „Opfern” des Erschwindelns, der Erpressung und Erzwingung der Gelder für GOMOPA von Firmen und Korporationen aus dem Gebieten Russland, Ukraine, sowie aus allen Staaten in Mittel-Osteuropa.
Offiziell führt die Firma E-xecutive eine dem Forum GOMOPA ähnliche Gewerbetätigkeit.
b) OOO «VK Broker». Leiter der Firma ist der Herr Pavel Kokarev. Diese Firma verheimlicht es nicht, dass sie mit dem Forum GOMOPA zusammenarbeitet. Die FirmaOOO VK Broker vertritt GOMOPA in Mittel-Osteuropa, auch in Russland. Sie übt offiziell auf diesem Gebiet dem GOMOPA ähnliche Tätigkeit aus, inoffiziell aber ist sie mit der Suche nach potenziellen „Opfern“ der Erpressung, des Betrugs und des Erschwindelns für GOMOPA beschäftigt. Die Firma blieb bis jetzt von jeder Strafe verschont, konnte mit „ewiger Straflosigkeit” wegen eines schlecht ausgearbeiteten, korrupten Rechtswesens in Russland rechnen. Die Situation kann sich jedoch ändern, nachdem Herr Klaus Maurischat in Berlin festgenommen und verhaftet worden ist. Dieser ständige Straftäter, der „auf seinem Konto” eine Reihe von rechtskräftigen Urteilen hat, der bis jetzt seine Freiheit unbegrenzt genossen hat, dementsprechend nicht weiß, was es bedeutet verhaftet zu werden, beginnt nach und nach laut uns zur Verfügung stehenden Angaben endlich „sein Zeugnis abzulegen“. Dies ist verständlich, wenn man die ihm drohende hohe Strafe berücksichtigt. Dieser Delinquent zeigt dabei immer größeres Interesse an der Zusammenarbeit mit den deutschen Verfolgungs- und Ermittlungsorganen. Es besteht also die Chance, dass er weitere Personen der Öffentlichkeit enthüllt, indem er auf Minderung der Gefängnisstrafe rechnet. Es ist auch nur die Frage der Zeit, wann INTERPOL in Zusammenarbeit mit der Russischen (FSB) der Firma OOO VK Broker „an die Tür klopft”, welche durch den Herrn Pavl Kokarev geführt und vertreten wird.
Die Firma OOO VK Broker besitzt ein virtuelles Buero im REGUS-Gebäude in Moskau, stellt nicht einmal eine Person an und bildet eine typische Ein-Person-Firma, die alle geschäftlichen „Delikte“ firmieren kann, wobei sie keine zivil-rechtliche Haftung trägt. Der Herr Pavel Kokarev scheint „vergessen zu haben” oder besitzt kein ausreichendes Wissen für seine eventuelle Verantwortung fier die Teilnahme an den internationalen Verbrechen unter Leitung von GOMOPA.“
Er lebt mitten unter uns, am Sterndamm 71 in 12487 Berlin und sein Profil gab es sogar auf Xing. Sogar seine private Homepage gab es noch vor kurzem: Sven Schmidt, der Mann, von dem seine Opfer sagen, dass er der Chef-Terrorist von Europas gefährlichster Internet-Kriminellen Bande ist.
Heinz Friedrich, Sprecher der SJB-Opfer, http://www.sjb-fonds-opfer.com erläutert: „Mit der Enttarnung von Sven Schmidt ist die letzte Lücke in der Beweiskette gegen die SJB-GoMoPa-Bande gelungen. Nunmehr liegen alle Fakten auf dem Tisch: Die Auftraggeber, die Täter und ihre Internet-Spuren.
Er hat die Cybermorde an Heinz Gerlach und anderen Opfern und die Cyber-Attacken auf uns geleitet.
Während Thomas Promny, Christian Sorger und Klaus Maurischat, die anderen Cyber-Terroristen aufgrund ihrer bizarren Persönlichkeitsstruktur immer ins Rampenlicht der Medien und der Hacker-Szene strebten, blieb er im Hintergrund.
Doch ohne ihn sind die Aktionen von Europas gefährlichster Internet-Kriminellen –Bande, die vielen gefährlichen Attacken sowie die kriminellen Stalker-Websites undenkbar.
Nunmehr haben wir ihn endgültig enttarnt. Damit schliesst sich die Beweiskette gegen die Bennewirtz-Maurischat-Bande.
Im Computerbereich der Gangster sind Sven Schmidt, ebenso wie Wladimir Palant Thomas Promny und Christian Sorger, die Haupt-Strafttäter und damit direkt verantwortlich für die Cybermorde an Heinz Gerlach und weitere, die versuchten Morde und Erpressungen an Meridian Capital, General Global Media, deren Inhabern und Angestellten und weiteren Personen, Dipl.-Ing. Paul Bösel, Andreas Decker, MoneyxPay, Wirecard, Estavis, CSA, Express Kurier Europa, Herbert Ernst Meridian Capital, DieErstemai GmbH, Oliver Schwertner, Ekrem Redzepagic, DKB, Teldafax, Express Kurier Europa, Beluga, Teldafax, Bernd Pulch und Martin Sachs und Hunderten mehr.
Ihre Straftaten fallen unter US-Recht, das bedeutet ca 20 Jahre bis lebenslänglich in einem der härtesten Gefängnisse der USA.
Wir werden deshalb die Anklage und die Auslieferung für diese Personen in die USA durchsetzen ebenso für Klaus Maurischat und weitere Komplizen.
Damit ist uns in wenigen Monaten ein weiterer Sieg gegen die Kriminellen gelungen, vor denen sich viele zu Recht gefürchtet haben.
Selbstverständlich geben wir alle Daten an weitere Opfer weiter““, berichtet Friedrich. Unsere Webseite http://www.sjb-fonds-opfer.com ist wegen Sicherungsheitsvorkehrungen derzeit noch offline, wird aber mit anderen Webseiten – analog zu dem Mirror-Procedere von Wikileaks – in Kürze wieder online sein. Die Webseite http://www.bennewirtz-opfer.com ist online.“
Laut Heinz Friedrich ist das Aktenzeichen für die Ermittlungen gegen die flüchtigen Sven Schmidt und Wladimir Palanter ST/0148943/2011
Dear Readers,
I do not like to bother you at all with “Shithouse Blogs” but I represent a silent and fast growing majority of honest people and companies who have been blackmailed by the serial fraudsters and cyberstalkers of the criminal East-Berlin “GoMoPa” organisation.
These people asked me to report about the newest facts.
Therefore I unveil here new facts about these criminals to protect and to serve these people, their families, friends and companies:
It came to our attention that “GoMoPa” seems to be a very close ally of Peter Ehlers from Hamburg.
Meanwhile a lot of people doubt this identity is true.
The so-called “Peter Ehlers” has accused the German Chancellor Angela Merkel and the German Minister of Finance, Wolfgang Schäuble and their processors, former Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder and former Minister of Finance, Peer Steibrück to be large scale criminals, fraudsters and concealers.
Furthermore they distribute in Peter Ehlers and Klaus Maurischats “Shithousefly Blog” real shitty news which just copy the real facts from Meridian Capital’s press release about the “Super-Shithousefly Klaus Maurischat detention and fake my name into it.
As you all are aware the German Criminal Police is investigating these and many many more dirty deeds of these “Super-Shithouseflies.”
The case numbers are numerous. The last one is: ST/0148943/2011
We keep you informed.
Sincerely yours
Magister Bernd Pulch
P.S. You all know what happens with “Super-Shitflies”…
Peter Ehlers und der NACHRICHTENDIENST” “GoMoPa” bezeichneten die deutsche Bundeskanzlerin Angela Merkel und den deutschen Bundesfinanzminister Wolfgang Schäuble als “kriminelle Hehler” und mich als “Internet-Terroristen”.
Dies ist bezeichnet für die psychotische Wahnwelt dieser mutmasslich kommunistischen Delinquenten aus dem Osten Deutschlands.
Zum Tatbestand:
Im deutschen Strafrecht ist die Beamtenbeleidigung kein eigener Tatbestand. Ein Beamter ist hier nicht anders gestellt als ein anderer Bürger. Es handelt sich also um eine „normale“ Beleidigung gemäß § 185StGB.
Dennoch gibt es bei der Beleidigung eines Amtsträgers, der nicht zwingend Beamter sein muss, eine verfahrensrechtliche Besonderheit: Während die Straftat grundsätzlich nur auf Antrag des Verletzten verfolgt wird, kann gemäß § 194 Abs. 3 StGB bei Amtsträgern auch der Dienstvorgesetzte des Beleidigten den Strafantrag stellen:
„Ist die Beleidigung gegen einen Amtsträger, einen für den öffentlichen Dienst besonders Verpflichteten oder einen Soldaten der Bundeswehr während der Ausübung seines Dienstes oder in Beziehung auf seinen Dienst begangen, so wird sie auch auf Antrag des Dienstvorgesetzten verfolgt. Richtet sich die Tat gegen eine Behörde oder eine sonstige Stelle, die Aufgaben der öffentlichen Verwaltung wahrnimmt, so wird sie auf Antrag des Behördenleiters oder des Leiters der aufsichtführenden Behörde verfolgt. Dasselbe gilt für Träger von Ämtern und für Behörden der Kirchen und anderen Religionsgesellschaften des öffentlichen Rechts.“
Außerdem wird von der Staatsanwaltschaft in der Regel das öffentliche Interesse an der Strafverfolgung bejaht, so dass es weitaus seltener zur Verweisung auf den Privatklageweg oder zur Einstellung des Verfahrens nach § 153, 153a StPO kommt.
In der Praxis zieht die Beleidigung vor allem von (Polizei-)Beamten meist Geldstrafen nach sich. Bei mehrfach wegen solcher Delikte vorbestraften Personen sind in der Praxis schon kurze Freiheitsstrafen von z. B. 3 Monaten ohne Bewährung vorgekommen.
Fallbeispiel:
“Prozesse-Dieter”, prozessfreudiger Sozialhilfeempfänger aus Ratingen, ist zu einem Jahr Haft verurteilt worden. Das Amtsgericht in Ratingen bei Düsseldorf sprach den als “König der Kläger” bekannt gewordenen ehemaligen 73-jährigen Sportlehrer wegen 44 Beleidigungen von Amtsträgern wie Beamten, Richtern und Rechtspflegern schuldig.
Per Postkarten hatte sie der Senior mit Fäkalausdrücken überzogen. Das Gericht setzte sich über den psychiatrischen Gutachter hinweg, der den Angeklagten als schuldunfähig eingestuft hatte, weil dieser an einer paranoiden Persönlichkeitsstörung leide.
Dies trifft möglicherweise auch auf die Delinquenten Peter Ehlers/”GoMoPa” zu.
Dear readers,
it is so riduculous.
There is a new fake entry in serial betrayer’s Maurischat blog “”the shit house fly
(in German language: “Die Scheisshausfliege”)”
I can not stop laughing
He just copied our articles and the press release of Meridian Capital and exchanged names.
Oh what a rotten shit fly he truly is
Have a great week
best regards
Magister Bernd Pulch
Liebe Leser,
nachstehend publiziere ich Material, das unserer Redaktion in Bezug auf die STASI-Mörder-Bande von STASI-Opfern zugespielt wurde.
Den vollen Text lesen Sie unter
http://sjb-fonds-opfer.com/?p=13110
und unter
http://bennewirtz-opfer.com/?p=9847
Mehr Infos unter
http://sjb-fonds-opfer.com/?page_id=11764
Herzlichst Ihr
Magister Bernd Pulch

ist am besten mit dem Licht der
Öffentlichkeit zu begegnen.“


see more info at http://www.victims-opfer.com
Die Liste wurde bereits früher hier publiziert:
Vom “Stasiopfer”-Angebot führt ein Link zu einer Website in den USA (www.jya.com), die sich auch mit den Praktiken von Geheimdiensten beschäftigt. Dort findet sich die “Fipro-Liste”, das detaillierte “Finanzprojekt” der Stasi, angefertigt in den letzten Tagen der DDR, um die Rentenansprüche der rund 100 000 hauptamtlichen Mitarbeiter des MfS auch nach dem Zusammenbruch des Systems belegen zu können. Die “Fipro-Liste” ist seit langem bekannt und diente Anfang der neunziger Jahre etwa zur Identifizierung der so genannten OibE – Offiziere im besonderen Einsatz. Diese Liste „Offiziere im besonderen Einsatz“im Jahre 1991 erschien in der “taz. Die Echtheit kann beim BStU überprüft werden.
Siehe u.a. http://www.spiegel.de/spiegel/print/d-22539439.html
Auf Druck ehemaliger STASI-Leute und Ihrer Genossen wurde die Liste aus dem Verkehr gezogen.
Hier ist sie wieder:
Diese Liste beinhaltet die Namen von 90.598 Mitarbeitern des Ministeriums für Staatssicherheit der DDR. Die Liste ist nicht vollständig. Insbesondere Mitarbeiter der Führungsebene sind nicht enthalten.
This is a list of 90.598 members of the secret police of East Germany (Ministry for State Security), the list isn’t complete, because the most of the high Officiers lieke Colonel and higher have destroyed the personal Informations in the last days of Eastern Germany.
| Listen der Stasimitarbeiter-hier findest Du sie! Was bedeuten die Zahlen? |
| 1.Listen der Stasi-Diensteinheiten! Bem.:hier kannst du die Nr.(6-stellig) der Dienststellen heraussuchen. 2.Liste der Stasi-Mitarbeiter (Hauptamtlich) Bem.:Hoffentlich hast Du einen guten Rechner, denn die Liste ist erschreckend lang. Die ersten 6 Ziffern sind das Geburtsdatum + die nächsten 6 Ziffern = Dienstausweisnummer! Die zwei Ziffern hinter dem Geburtsdatum geben das Geschlecht an: 41 und 42 = Männlich, 51 und 52 = Weiblich! Wichtig für suchen und finden, sind die sechs Ziffern in den Semikolon vor den Namen: z.B. ;07;00;44; ! Das ist die Nummer der Dienststelle ! Also du suchst in der Liste der Dienststellen, die Nummer der Dienststelle, die Dich interessiert. Damit gehst Du in die Liste der Mitarbeiter und suchst Dir alle Mitarbeiter der entsprechenden Dienststelle heraus. Ich habe das für mein Wohnort getan und so alle Mitarbeiter gefunden. Ob die Liste Vollständig ist kann ich nicht einschätzen, aber zumindest er/kannte ich einige Exverräter vom Namen her. 3.Liste der OibE (Offiziere im besonderen Einsatz) |
Hiermit stelle ich eine Liste der Stasi-Mitarbeiter mit Ihrem Klarnamen zum Download isn Internet.
Die Liste ist ab sofort auch auf vielen anderen Webseiten zu finden unter anderem.
http://www.sjb-fonds-opfer.com
http://www.bennewirtz-opfer.com
✌#The Rise and Fall of the Mucha Spy Family under Putin’s Wings
(Investment Magazin, Investment, Das Investment) DAS ORIGINAL – In der ZDF-Dokumention „Sonderauftrag Mord. Die Geheimnisse der Stasi“Der tödliche Arm der DDR werden die tödlichen Taten der Stasi um den „Ersten Kriminologen der DDR“, Ehrenfried Stelzer, enthüllt.
„Focus“ schreibt : „In der Reportage „Sonderauftrag Mord“ beleuchten ZDF-Filmemacher die geheimnisvollsten Missionen der geheimnisvollsten Behörde der ehemaligen DDR: die Tötungseinsätze des Ministeriums für Staatssicherheit. Genauer gesagt: die vermeintlichen Tötungseinsätze. Denn Genaues weiß man (fast) nicht. Zum tödlichen Treiben der Stasi gibt es vor allem Mutmaßungen und selten wirklich belastbare Beweise. Was die Sache nur umso mysteriöser und noch spannender macht… Dass dies nicht alles nur Hirngespinste sind, dokumentiert mindestens ein Fall, in dem ein Mordauftrag der Stasi gerichtsfest belegt ist. Wolfgang Welsch war in der DDR Schauspieler und Regimegegner. Sieben Jahre verbrachte er in Gefängnissen, bevor die BRD ihn freikaufte. Im Westen baute Welsch eine Fluchthilfeorganisation auf, die vielen DDR-Bürgern ein Entkommen aus dem real existierenden Drangsalismus ermöglichte – ihn selbst aber erst recht zum Feind der Stasi stempelte.
Die Ost-Geheimen setzten falsche Freunde auf ihn an. Peter H. einer von ihnen, begleitete Welsch mit Frau und Kind im Urlaub nach Israel. Dort mischte der Agent Rattengift ins Essen, was Welsch beinahe das Leben kostete. Im sogenannten Bulettenprozess wurde dieser Fall konkret juristisch aufgearbeitet. Und weil dies so ist, entspringt das Thema dieser guten und eindrucksvoll inszenierten ZDF-Dokumentation leider nicht einer blühenden Phantasie. Sondern gehört ins gesamtdeutsche Geschichtsbuch.“
Das Gift hat Methode bei den Stasi-Mördern.
Zuerst nahm der aus der DDR geflohene Fußballlehrer Jörg Berger nur ein Kribbeln in den Zehen wahr, dann in den ganzen Füßen und Händen. Hinzu kamen Fieber, Übelkeit und ein allgemeines Schwächegefühl. Hatte die Stasi ihn vergiftet?
Als er seine Gliedmaßen kaum noch spürte und nicht mehr laufen konnte, musste Jörg Berger für lange Zeit seinen Beruf aufgeben. Eine Erklärung für seine schwere Krankheit im Jahr 1986 hatte der populäre Trainer Berger viele Jahre lang nicht, genauso wenig konnte er sich erklären, warum sich an seinem neuen Auto plötzlich ein Rad löste.
“Frisierte” Akten
Erst als er nach der Wende seine Stasi-Akten sichtete, kam ihm ein schrecklicher Verdacht: Steckte der DDR-Geheimdienst hinter seiner Krankheit und dem mysteriösen Autounfall? Wollte man ihn “nur” einschüchtern? Oder gab es gar einen “offiziellen” Tötungsplan?
Wie weit ist die Stasi gegangen? Führende Stasi-Offiziere bestreiten bis heute Morde im Auftrag des Ministeriums für Staatssicherheit, der Nachweis ist schwierig. Viele Akten wurden kurz vor der Wende “frisiert”, brisantes Material hektisch vernichtet. Doch die Indizienkette, die Mordabsichten plausibel erscheinen lässt, wird immer dichter. Jörg Berger wird die Wahrheit nie erfahren. Im Juni dieses Jahres ist er an Krebs gestorben.
In den Osten entführt
Die bisherigen Erkenntnisse führen in die 1950er Jahre zurück, als die Stasi “Verräter” aus dem Westen in den Osten entführen ließ. Manche wurden nach Schauprozessen hingerichtet, andere blieben für immer verschwunden. Nach dem Bau der Mauer bildete die Stasi dann “Kämpfer” aus, die auf einem geheimen Truppenübungsplatz das Liquidieren von Menschen übten.
Die Stasi experimentierte auch mit Sprengstoff. Für Übungszwecke wird ein Wartburg in die Luft gejagt (nachgestellte Spielszene). Wurde diese Erfahrungen auch bei Anschlägen im Westen “angewandt?”
In der Stasiunterlagenbehörde in Berlin finden sich konkrete Mordplanungen: Der geflohene Grenzoffizier Rudi Thurow sollte 1963 mit einem 1.000 Gramm schweren Hammer erschlagen werden, bei einem anderen Fahnenflüchtigen plante die Stasi, einen Sprengsatz unter dem Sattel seines Mopeds zu montieren.
Zitat
„Das Liquidieren beinhaltet die physische Vernichtung von Einzelpersonen oder von Personengruppen. Erreichbar durch: Das Erschießen, Erstechen, Verbrennen, Zersprengen, Strangulieren, Erschlagen, Vergiften, Ersticken.“
BStU: Ausbildungsbuch des MfS, 1974
Ex-Stasimitarbeiter berichten
Ab den 1970er Jahren wurden Mordplanungen nicht mehr aufgeschrieben – es gab sie aber dennoch. Gegenüber dem ZDF berichtet ein ehemaliger MfS-Mitarbeiter von Plänen, den geflohenen Geheimdienstagenten Werner Stiller zu ermorden, und in einem anderen Fall gibt es ein Geständnis eines ehemaligen MfS-Offiziers, der den Auftrag hatte, einen Fluchthelfer zu vergiften.
Noch immer kommen Neuigkeiten ans Licht: So hat ein Stasi-Spitzel Anfang dieses Jahres bestätigt, dass es tatsächlich Mordpläne gegen den geflohenen Fußballspieler Lutz Eigendorf gab.
Die ZDF-Dokumentation “Sonderauftrag Mord” widerlegt die Legende der Stasiführung, das MfS hätte mit Auftragsmorden nichts zu tun. Zeugenaussagen, Archivfunde und investigative Recherchen beweisen, mit welch tödlicher Energie die Stasi gegen “Feinde” des DDR-Regimes vorgegangen ist. Der verstorbene Fußballtrainer Jörg Berger gab für diese ZDF-Produktion sein letztes großes Interview.
Auch heute noch gehen die alten Seilschaften der Stasi, wie der „NACHRICHTENDIENST“ „GoMoPa“ mit Stasi-Methoen vor. Das beweisen auch ihre Droh-Emails gegen unsere Journalisten (siehe berndpulch.org).
Bei der gezielten Unterwanderung der westdeutschen Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft wird auch heute noch mit der „Operativen Psychologie“ der Stasi gearbeitet. Die alten Stasi-Schergen sind immer noch aktiv, wie das Beispiel des millionenfachen Dioxin-Vergifters und Stasi-Mannes Siegfried Siewert zeigt. Sein Namensvetter Stasi-Mann „Siegfried Sievert“ ist in Wirklichkeit der vorbestrafte Serienbetrüger Klaus Maurischat.
Deep Throat, Berlin: „Für“GoMoPa“ und deren alte Stasi-Kader wie dem psychotischen Peter Ehlers ist jedes Mittel recht, das in ihrem Stasi-Arsenal lagert, um Gegner auszuschalten und die macht im Finanzmarkt zu übernehmen.“
Wie die millionenfache DiOXIN-Vergiftung zeigt schrecken die Stasi-Seilschaften vor nichts zurück, wenn sie glauben, es sei ihren dubiosen Zielen nützlich. Ein erschütterndes Beispiel hierfür ist auch das Schicksal des Stasi-Opfers Joerg Berger.
Joerg Berger wurde von der Stasi mit Arsen und Blei vergiftet. In seiner Biographie schildert, der wohl auch deswegen viel zu früh verstorbenen Fussball-Trainer Jörg Berger die Tatumstände.
„Meine zwei Halbzeiten“ – so heißt seine Biographie.
Zu seiner Biographie sagt Berger: „Es ist genau der richtige Zeitpunkt, meine deutsch-deutsche Geschichte aufzuschreiben. Weil ich jetzt die Hälfte meines Lebens im Osten und die andere Hälfte im Westen gelebt habe.“
Es geht um seine spektakuläre Flucht 1979 aus der DDR, seine Krebs-Erkrankung, sein Leben als Fußball-Retter.
Wie die Stasi ihn im Westen jagte.
Seit ich 1979 in den Westen geflohen war, verfolgte ich aufmerksam wie Lutz Eigendorf sich verhielt, der eine Woche vor mir Republikflucht begangen hatte. Er trat sehr provokativ auf, besonders im Fernsehen, kritisierte den Staat drüben massiv, so dass ich mich fragte, wie lange sich die Stasi das gefallen lassen würde.
Ich hatte ihn gewarnt: „Mensch, Lutz, hör auf mit diesem Quatsch. Wenn deine alte Mannschaft Dynamo in Hamburg spielt, dann geh nicht zu deinen ehemaligen Kollegen ins Hotel oder an die Bar, nur um ihnen zu zeigen, wie gut es dir im Westen geht.“
Eigendorf, der sicher einer der talentiertesten von den geflüchteten DDR-Spielern war, zeigte keine Einsicht, wollte keinen Rat annehmen.
Als er am 5. März 1983 einen Autounfall hatte, bei dem er lebensgefährlich verletzt wurde und zwei Tage später starb, konnte ich das nur in einem Zusammenhang mit seinem provokanten Verhalten sehen. Die Obduktion ergab, dass er einen hohen Alkoholgehalt im Blut hatte (2,2 Promille/ d.Red.), am Abend vorher soll er aber laut Aussagen von Vereinskollegen nur wenig getrunken haben.
Eigendorf wurde von der Stasi verblitzt.
Heute, nach über 25 Jahren, spricht vieles für einen Stasi-Mord. Einen absoluten Beweis gibt es jedoch nicht. Neue Untersuchungen legen nahe, dass die Stasi Lutz möglicherweise heimlich ein pupillenerweiterndes Mittel verabreicht hat, um ihn gezielt zu blenden. In seinen Stasiakten steht „Eigendorf verblitzt“.
Von seinem Unfall-Tag an ließ ich regelmäßig mein Auto bei verschiedenen Werkstätten überprüfen. Plötzlich fielen mir auch einige merkwürdige Vorfälle wieder ein. Einmal hatte sich bei Tempo 160 ein Rad gelöst, mehrmals waren meine Reifen zerstochen worden. Jetzt konnte ich mir einen Reim darauf machen. Ich hatte eine Ahnung davon bekommen, wie weit das MfS (Ministerium für Staatssicherheit, die Red.) gehen konnte.
Nur mit Gewalt und Drogen hätte man mich in die DDR zurückgekriegt
Am 11. Oktober 1984 rief mich völlig überraschend Bernd Stange von einem Hotel in Luxemburg an. Dort bereitete er als Fußball-Nationaltrainer der DDR seine Mannschaft auf ein WM-Quali-Spiel vor. (…) Eigentlich hätte mich diese Kontaktaufnahme nachdenklich stimmen können, doch mir kam dergleichen nicht in den Sinn.
Was ich erst durch das Buch „Trainer zwischen den Welten“ von Heiko Mallwitz erfuhr: die Staatssicherheit hatte die Absicht, mich mit Stanges Hilfe in die DDR zurückzuführen, besser gesagt, zu entführen. Ich frage mich das auch noch heute, wie man das bewerkstellige wollte. Rhetorisch war Stange gut, aber so gut, dass er mich mit Worten dazu hätte bringen können, freiwillig nach drüben zurückzugehen – nein, das war nicht vorstellbar. Also blieben, in meiner Schlussfolgerung nur Gewalt und Drogen.
Jörg Berger wurde am 13. Oktober 1944 in Gotenhafen bei Danzig geboren. Seine Mutter floh mit ihm im Januar 1945 vor der herannahenden Roten Armee, verzichtete im letzten Moment auf die Reise mit der „Wilhelm Gustloff“. Ihr Glück. Das Schiff wurde versenkt (9000 Tote).
Seine Flucht, seine Klubs, seine Erfolge Jörg Berger wurde am 13. Oktober 1944 in Gotenhafen bei Danzig geboren. Seine Mutter floh mit ihm im Januar 1945 vor der herannahenden Roten Armee, verzichtete im letzten Moment auf die Reise mit der „Wilhelm Gustloff“. Ihr Glück. Das Schiff wurde versenkt (9000 Tote).Seine Flucht, seine Klubs, seine Erfolge Er wuchs in Leipzig auf, wurde Jugend-Nationalspieler der DDR, spielte für Lok Leipzig.Seine Flucht, seine Klubs, seine Erfolge 1972 erster Trainer-Job bei Carl Zeiss Jena (mit Hans Meyer), später der B-Jugendauswahl der DDR.Seine Flucht, seine Klubs, seine Erfolge 1979 Flucht bei einem Länderspiel in Jugoslawien.Seine Flucht, seine Klubs, seine Erfolge 12 Klubs als Trainer (Düsseldorf, Kassel, Hannover, SC Freiburg, Frankfurt, Köln, Schalke, Basel/Schweiz, Karlsruhe, noch mal Frankfurt, Bursaspor/Türkei, Aachen, Rostock).Seine Flucht, seine Klubs, seine Erfolge Größte Erfolge: Last-Minute-Rettung mit Frankfurt (1999), Pokalfinale mit Aachen (2004).
1 von 6
Meine Gliedmaßen waren wie tot.
1986 war ich vom Zweitligisten Hessen Kassel zum Erstligisten Hannover gewechselt. Das war etwas, was die Stasi kaum gewollt haben konnte. Seitdem stand ich noch mehr in den Schlagzeilen.
Zu diesem Zeitpunkt nahm ich ein Kribbeln wahr, zuerst in der linken Großzehe, dann insgesamt in den Füßen und Händen. Hinzu kam Fieber, Übelkeit und ein allgemeines Schwächegefühl. Ich dachte, ich hätte mir einen Virus eingefangen oder vielleicht zu viel Stress.
Das Kribbeln hörte nicht auf, wurde von Tag zu Tag schlimmer. Meine Gliedmaßen spürte ich schließlich kaum noch, alles war taub, wie tot. Erst als ich nicht mehr laufen konnte, suchte ich einen Spezialisten auf.
Eine Untersuchung nach der anderen wurde unternommen – doch eine zufriedenstellende Erklärung fand sich nicht.
Trotzdem ließ mich fortan das diffuse Gefühl nicht mehr los, dass hinter dieser Krankheit vielleicht doch etwas anderes steckte als eine körperliche oder seelische Ursache.
Blei- und Arsenverbindungen wurden mir ins Essen oder Trinken getan.
Nach der Wende forderte man mich auf, meine Krankenakten an Professor Dr. Wolfgang Eisenmenger zu schicken, tätig am Institut für Rechtsmedizin der Münchner Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität. Er kam zu dem Ergebnis, dass es sich aufgrund der darin beschriebenen Symptome wahrscheinlich nicht um eine Viruserkrankung, sondern um eine Vergiftung gehandelt habe. Er konkretisierte dies auch noch in Hinsicht auf eine Schwermetallvergiftung aus der Gruppe der Blei- und Arsenverbindungen.
Die Stasi-Akten geben darüber keine klaren Auskünfte. Das einzige, was aus den Akten selber hervorgeht, ist, dass in der Zeit „agressives Verhalten gegenüber dem Feindbild Berger“ angesagt war. In meiner Lesart: Es ging ihnen bei mir nicht gerade um Mord, sondern darum, mich beruflich außer Gefecht zu setzen. Nicht umsonst hatte man mir wohl ein Gift gegeben, das Lähmungserscheinungen auslöst. Dennoch: In zu hoher Dosierung hätte es meine Gliedmaßen absterben lassen, aber auch zum Tode führen können. Dann wäre es doch ein Auftragsmord gewesen. Mit großer Wahrscheinlichkeit hat mir jemand das Mittel in ein Getränk oder ins Essen getan. Ich kann von Glück sagen, dass ich nicht Lutz Eigendorfs Schicksal teilte.
Ich kann Stange nicht verzeihen.
Ein Einblick in meine Stasiakten konnte Aufschluss darüber geben, wer Freund und wer Feind war. Insgesamt zählte ich 21 regelmäßig auftretende offizielle Informelle Mitarbeiter, die man auf mich angesetzt hatte. Davon neun im Osten. Erschreckend war, schwarz auf weiß zu lesen, wie nah die Stasi im Westen an mir dran war. Das Schlimmste jedoch war folgende Gewissheit: Zwei mir nahestehende Menschen hatten mich verraten. Rolf G. (ein Freund, mit dem Berger Ski gefahren ist und zeltete, die Red.) und Bernd Stange.
Stange hat denunziert und verraten, Menschen, die ihm nahestanden, möglicherweise in Gefahr gebracht, um daraus persönliche Vorteile zu ziehen. Dadurch war er wohl auch DDR-Nationaltrainer geworden.
Beiden kann ich nicht verzeihen. Denn die Enttäuschung, von zwei Freunden verraten worden zu sein, belastet mich noch heute.“
Informant: Wie die Stasi die Rentenkasse des „Klassenfeindes“ platt machen will
Ein Informant der SJB-GoMoPa-Opfer spielte brisantes Material zu: „Wie die Stasi ihre eigene Republikflucht plante und durchführte oder Wie machen wir dem Klassenfeind seine Rentenkasse “platt”.
Auf über 30 Seiten wir die Unterwanderung der BRD durch die Stasi in diesem internen Bericht aus dem Jahre 1989 detailliert darlegt. Den Originalbericht finden Sie unter http://sjb-fonds-opfer.com/?p=12919
Vor allem die deutschen Rentenkassen, Stiftungen, Vermögensverwalter sollten so unterwandert werden. Im selben Jahr 1989 gründet Gerd-Wilhelm Bennewirtz SJB.
Zitat: „„Wir saßen unter einem Apfelbaum und beschlossen, es für ein Jahr zu versuchen. Mehr als schief gehen konnte es nicht“, erinnert sich Bennewirtz.“ 1989 ist auch das erste Jahr in Peter Ehlers Xing-Biographie. Auf kress.de, dem who is who der Medienbranche hat er keine Angaben – weil sie keiner Überprüfung Stand halten wie im fall des Stasi-Agenten Maurischat.
1989 war auch der Startpunkt für viel Stasi-Agenten „rüberzumachen – 1989 das Jahr der Wende.
Der „Spiegel“ schreibt: „Die Inoffiziellen Mitarbeiter (IM) wurden noch 1989 aus der DDR in den Westen geschickt.“
Zitat in Focus“: „Der Historiker Hubertus Knabe glaubt, dass die Gesellschaft im Westen intensiver als bisher angenommen von der Stasi beeinflusst war
FOCUS: In Ihrem Buch behaupten Sie, der Westen sei von der Stasi gelenkt und unterwandert gewesen. Muss die Geschichte der Bundesrepublik neu geschrieben werden?
Knabe: Sie muss neu geschrieben werden in Hinblick auf die Aktivitäten des DDR-Staatssicherheitsdienstes. Die Zeitgeschichtsforschung hat diese konspirative Dimension westdeutscher Vergangenheit bisher mit Schweigen übergangen. Doch egal, ob es um Politiker von FDP oder Grünen, die Friedensbewegung oder die 68er- Studentenrevolte geht – die Stasi hatte immer einen Fuß in der Tür.
FOCUS: War die Arbeit des MfS tatsächlich so effektiv? Ihr Kollege Helmut Müller-Enbergs konstatiert, Aufwand und Ergebnis der Stasi-Spionage hätten nicht selten in krassem Missverhältnis gestanden.
Knabe: Sicher hat es seitens der Stasi auch Wunschdenken über ihren Einfluss im Westen gegeben. Aber die Intensität der Unterwanderung ist erschreckend. Acht Bundestagsabgeordnete hatten MfS-Kontakte. Die Liste der als Informanten geführten Politiker reicht vom Berliner SDS-Sekretär Walter Barthel bis zum deutschlandpolitischen Sprecher der Grünen, Dirk Schneider. Mit ihrer Hilfe hatte es die DDR-Führung bis 1989 geschafft, im demokratischen Nachbarstaat zunehmend Akzeptanz zu finden bis hin zur Quasi-Anerkennung durch die Regierung.“
Zitatende
Der Niedergang der entkräfteten SED zog auch den Niedergang des MfS nach sich. Nicht zuletzt deshalb vermochte sich die Staatssicherheit gegenüber dem drohenden Zusammenbruch nicht zu wehren. Während des Umbruchs in der DDR richtete sich der Zorn weiter Kreise in der Bevölkerung maßgeblich gegen das MfS, das den Unterdrückungsapparat symbolisierte. Bei Demonstrationen wurde die Auflösung des MfS gefordert. E. Krenz, der Nachfolger Honeckers, wollte noch im November 1989 ein Gesetz über die Befugnisse des MfS erarbeiten lassen. Ministerpräsident H. Modrow ersetzte im November 1989 das MfS durch ein “Amt für Nationale Sicherheit”. Diese Nachfolgeorganisation wurde auf Druck des “Runden Tisches” durch einen Beschluss des Ministerrates im Dezember 1989 aufgelöst, wenngleich einzelne Strukturen fortbestanden – etwa bei der Beseitigung von Unterlagen. Die geplante Einrichtung eines “Verfassungsschutzes der DDR” und eines “Nachrichtendienstes der DDR” unterblieb nicht zuletzt aufgrund der Standhaftigkeit der Bürgerbewegungen und Bürgerkomitees. Der Sturm auf die Zentrale des MfS in der Normannenstraße am 15.1.1990 dürfte maßgeblich durch die Staatssicherheit inszeniert gewesen sein. Unter der Regierung de Maizière erfolgten weitere Maßnahmen zur Auflösung der Organe der Staatssicherheit. Als die DDR der BRD beitrat, war das MfS aufgelöst – ungeachtet des Fortwirkens entsprechender “Seilschaften”.
Diese Seilschaften benutzen und benutzen ihre alten Stasi-Methoden weiter zur Unterwanderung der deutschen Wirtschaft. Dies wird besonders deutlich an dem Versuch des Stasi-Obersten Ehrenfried Stelzer mit Ex-Verfassungsschutz Chef Hellenroich ein gemeinsames „Sicherheits-Unternehmen“ zu gründen sowie in den Aktivitäten der „GoMoPa“.
Deep Throat, Berlin: „Aus diesem Stasi-Umfeld“ der alten Seilschaften kommen die „GoMoPa“-Leute, aber auch der Ex-Stasi-Kader mit dem Tarnnamne „Peter Exxxx“ (anonymisiert), der heute noch mit Stasi-Methoden der „Operativen Psychologie“ arbeitet.
(Investment Magazin, Investment, Das Investment) DAS ORIGINAL – „Die Festnahme des Herrn Klaus Maurischat ist ein ausschlaggebender Moment, anders gesagt eine „Wende um 180 Grad” für ihn persönlich. Es bedeutet aber auch den „Anfang vom Ende“ für seine Mitarbeiter, für die Internetservices, Bloggers, die mit GOMOPA so gerne und ohne Widerspruch zusammengearbeitet hatten. Es unterliegt keinem Zweifel, dass die Festnahme von Herrn Klaus Maurischat nur die Spitze des „Eisbergs” ist“, so Meridian Capital, die von Maurischat und GoMoPa erpresst worden sind.
Siehe: http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:8jmni-h2e_4J:www.maurischatinhaft.wordpress.com/+verhaftung+klaus+maurischat&cd=2&hl=de&ct=clnk&gl=de&source=www.google.de
Klaus-Dieter Maurischat hat nach Angaben von Meridian Capital bereits 23 Gerichtsurteile wegen einschlägiger Vergehen und ist im Gegensatz zu seinen Cyber-Opfern tatsächlich vorbestraft (zum Beispiel: Krefeld vom 24. April 2006; AZ: 28 Ls 85/05) siehe http://sjb-fonds-opfer.com/?page_id=11764.
(Investment Magazin, Investment, Das Investment) DAS ORIGINAL – Der mehrfach vorbestrafte Serienbetrüger Klaus Maurischat („GoMoPa“) hat ein eigenes Portal nur für Kinder und deren „Sexualerziehung“. Dies haben der Informationsdienst Tip-Talk und die Anleger-Opfer von http://www.sjb-fonds-opfer.com enthüllt: http://www.gomopa4kids.net.
Hier werden User von dem mehrfach vorbestraften Betrüger (AZ: 28 Ls 85/05) darüber aufgeklärt, was es mit der „Selbstbefriedigung“ und anderen Sexualpraktiken angeblich auf sich hat: „Wahr oder falsch: Gerüchte über Selbstbefriedigung! „
TipTalk kommentiert: „Wenn Sie Ihre Kinder nicht selbst aufklären können oder wollen, sollten Sie das getrost Gomopa überlassen.
Über Selbstbefriedigung erzählt man sich immer noch verrückte Geschichten. Wir sagen dir was stimmt und was voll
gelogen ist!
http://www.gomopa4kids.net kümmert sich gern um Ihren Nachwuchs.
http://www.gomopa4kids.net/Forum/liebe-sex-und-beziehungen/wahr-oder-falsch-geruechte-ueber-selbstbefriedigung-
p232.html#post232.“
Unsere Presseanfrage zu dem heiklen Thema beantworte der vorbestrafte Betrüger erst gar nicht, sondern schickte einen Herren „Siegfried Siewert“ vor, der versuchte mit Droh-Telefonaten
und Droh-E-Mails das Erscheinen der brisanten Informationen zu verhindern.
Siehe auch
http://sjb-fonds-opfer.com/?p=11490
Pikant dabei: „Siegfied Siewert“ ist wie viele „GoMoPa“-Kenner wissen, ein selbstgewähltes Pseudonym für Klaus Maurischat.
Und: Die „GoMoPa“-Kinder-Webseite wird genau da gehostet, wo auch Maurischats GoMoPa-Webpage sowie zahlreiche ihm zugerechnete Cyberstalking-Erpresserseiten gehostet werden (siehe die Verbindungsdaten im nachfolgenden Text).
Erstaunlich ist auch, das Maurischat seinen zahlreichen Cyberstalking-Opfern immer wieder Sexualdelikte mit Kindern vorgeworfen hat – an diesen anoynmen Vorwürfen war natürlich in keinem Fall irgendetwas wahr.
(Investment Magazin, Investment, Das Investment) DAS ORIGINAL – „Die Festnahme des Herrn Klaus Maurischat ist ein ausschlaggebender Moment, anders gesagt eine „Wende um 180 Grad” für ihn persönlich. Es bedeutet aber auch den „Anfang vom Ende“ für seine Mitarbeiter, für die Internetservices, Bloggers, die mit GOMOPA so gerne und ohne Widerspruch zusammengearbeitet hatten. Es unterliegt keinem Zweifel, dass die Festnahme von Herrn Klaus Maurischat nur die Spitze des „Eisbergs” ist“, so Meridian Capital, die von Maurischat und GoMoPa erpresst worden sind.
Siehe: http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:8jmni-h2e_4J:www.maurischatinhaft.wordpress.com/+verhaftung+klaus+maurischat&cd=2&hl=de&ct=clnk&gl=de&source=www.google.de
Klaus-Dieter Maurischat hat nach Angaben von Meridian Capital bereits 23 Gerichtsurteile wegen einschlägiger Vergehen und ist im Gegensatz zu seinen Cyber-Opfern tatsächlich vorbestraft (zum Beispiel: Krefeld vom 24. April 2006; AZ: 28 Ls 85/05) siehe http://sjb-fonds-opfer.com/?page_id=11764.
„Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. London, seit Jahren im Kampf gegen den Cyber-Terrorismus aktiv, enthüllt neue kriminelle Erscheinungen im Netz
(Investment Magazin, Investment, Das Investment) DAS ORIGINAL – Über eine selbstgebaute Blogseite verbreiten die GoMoPa-Gangster eine gefälschte Stellung von Meridian Capital, um Verwirrung zu stiften.
Diese Blogseite existiert erst seit Dezember 2010.
Beweis:
http://www.hypestat.com/pressreleaser.org
Die Meridian Capital-Seite, das Original,
http://othergomopa.blogspot.com/
ist dagegen bereits seit2009 online
Beweis: Aussage Meridian Capital – das Unternehmen können Sie auch gerne direkt kontaktieren.
und
KLAUS DIETER MAURISCHAT IN DETENTION
Source: http://klaus-dieter-maurischat.blogspot.com/2009/01/klaus-dieter-maurischat-in-haft.html
Hintergrund:
Klaus Maurischat und Mark Vornkahl, Betreiber vonwww.gomopa.net: Am 24. April 2006 war die Verhandlung am Amtsgericht Krefeld in der Betrugssache: Mark Vornkahl / Klaus Maurischat ./. Dehnfeld. Aktenzeichen: 28 Ls 85/05 Klaus MaurischatLange Straße 3827313 Dörverden.Das in diesem Verfahren ausschließlich diese Betrugsache verhandelt wurde, ist das Urteil gegen Klaus Maurischat recht mäßig ausgefallen.Zusammenfassung der Verhandlung vom 24.04.2006 vor dem Schöffengericht des AG Krefeld in der Sache gegen Klaus Maurischat und Mark Vornkahl.Zur Hauptverhandlung erschienen:Richter Dr. Meister, 2 Schöffen,Staatsanwalt, Angeklagter Klaus Maurischat, vertr. durch RA Meier, Berlin; aus der U-Haft zur Verhandlung überführt.1. Eine Gerichtsvollzieherin stellt unter Ausschuss der Öffentlichkeit eine Urkunde an den Angeklagten Maurischat zu.2. Bei Mark Vornkahl wurde im Gerichtssaal eineTaschenpfändung vorgenommen.Beginn der HauptverhandlungDie Beklagten verzichten auf eine Einlassung zu Beginn.Nach Befragung des Zeugen Denfeld zum Sachverhalt wurde dieVerhandlung auf Wunsch der Staatsanwaltschaft und den Verteidigern unterbrochen.Der Angeklagte Maurischat gab nach Fortsetzung derHauptverhandlung Folgendes zu Protokoll:Er sähe ein, dass das Geld auf das falsche Konto gegangen sei und nicht dem eigentlichen Verwendungszweck zugeführt wurde. Das Geld sei aber zurückgezahlt worden und er distanziere sich ausdrücklich von einem Betrug.Schließung der BeweisaufnahmeDer Staatsanwalt verließt sein PlädoyerEr halte am Vorwurf des Betruges fest. Mit Hinweis auf die einschlägigen Vorstrafen des Angekl. Maurischatund auf laufende Ermittlungsverfahren, beantrage er ein Strafmaß von 1 Jahr und 6 Monaten.Er halte dem Angeklagten zu Gute, dass dieserWiedergutmachung geleistet habe, und dass dieser geständig war. Zudem läge die letzte Verurteilung wegen Betruges 11 Jahre zurück. Auch sei der Geschädigte nicht in existentielle Not geraten, wobei der Staatsanwalt nicht über noch laufende Verfahren hinweg sehen könne. Er läge aber dem Angeklagten Maurischat nahe, keine weiteren Aktivitäten im Bezirk der Staatsanwaltschaft Krefeld auszuüben, insbesondere möchte er, dass keine weiteren Anleger im Bezirk der Staatsanwaltschaft Krefeld durch GoMoPa akquiriert werden.Die Freiheitsstrafe soll zur Bewährung ausgesetzt werden.Plädoyer des Verteidigers des Angekl. Maurischat, Herrn RA MeierEr schließe sich, wie (in der Unterbrechung) vereinbart, dem Staatsanwalt an.Es stimme, dass sein Mandant Fehler in seiner Vergangenheit gemacht habe, und dass er auch diesmal einen Fehler begangen haben könnte, jedoch sei der Hinweis wichtig, dass sein Mandant aus diesen Fehlern gelernt habe.Der Angeklagte haben das letzte Wort.Maurischat sagt, es sei bereits alles gesagt worden.Unterbrechung zu Hauptverhandlung. Der Richter zieht sich mit den Schöffen zur Beratung zurück.Urteilsverkündung:Der Angeklagte wird des gemeinschaftlichen Betrugs für schuldig befunden.Der Angeklagte Klaus Maurischat wird zu einerFreiheitsstrafe von 1 Jahr und 6 Monaten verurteilt. Diese wird zur Bewährung ausgesetzt.Die Bewährungszeit wird auf 3 Jahre festgesetzt.Der Haftbefehl gegen Klaus Maurischat wird aufgehoben.Der Angeklagte trage die Kosten des Verfahrens.UrteilsbegründungDer Richter erklärt, dass eine Täuschung des Geschädigtenvorliegt und somit keine Untreue in Betracht kommen kann.Die Fragen, ob es sich um einen Anlagebetrug handele sei irrelevant. Er hält den Angeklagten die geleistete Wiedergutmachung zu Gute.Ebenso ist das Geständnis für die Angeklagten zu werten. Zudem liegt die letzte Verurteilung des Angeklagten Maurischat 11 Jahre zurück.Die Parteien verzichten auf Rechtsmittel. Das Urteil ist somit rechtskräftig.Mit dem heutigen Urteil endet ein Kapitel in derBetrugssache Goldman Morgenstern & Partners, Klaus Maurischat und Mark Vornkahl.Alle GoMoPa.net Verantwortlichen, Maurischat, Vornkahl und Henneberg sind nun vorbestrafte Abzocker und Betrüger und die Zukunft der Pseudoklitsche GoMoPa.net sieht duster aus.Mir dem Geständnis der beiden ABZOCKER MAURISCHAT UND VORNKAHL vor Gericht bricht ein jahrelangaufrechterhaltenes Lügengeflecht von einigen primitiven Betrügern zusammen. Gewohnheitsverbrecher und Denunzianten,die rechtschaffene Personen und Firmen in ihren Verbrecherforen kriminalisierten.
|
||||||||||||
|
Wir haben ihn wegen Verleumdung und anderer schwerwiegender Delikte angezeigt.
Das Handelsblatt schreibt über Maurischat undGoMopa: „Die Bundesanstalt für
Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht BaFin hat aufgrund der merkwürdigen
Kursturbulenzen der Wirecard -Aktie eine förmliche Untersuchung des Falles
eingeleitet. BaFin prüft mögliche Marktmanipulationen nach Falschbericht des
Internetdienstes Gomopa. Zwei der Gomopa-Gründer wurden schon 2006 wegen Betrugs
verurteilt…
Mark Vornkahl, einer der Gründer von Gomopa wies den Vorwurf der
Kursmanipulation gestern zurück. Man wolle nur die Wahrheit aufdecken. Es ist
allerdings nicht das erste Mal, dass Gomopa-Vertreter ins Zwielicht geraten.
2006 wurden Vornkahl und Mitgründer Klaus Maurischat wegen Betrugs an einem
Anleger verurteilt. Maurischat gab gestern gegenüber dem Handelsblatt weitere
Verurteilungen zu. Es habe sich dabei jedoch nicht um Anlagebetrug gehandelt.
;siehe Beweis:
und die Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung (FAZ) schreibt über Maurischat und
GoMoPa.
“Nach Informationen der F.A.Z. sollen unter anderem gezielt über den
Finanznachrichtendienst Gomopa im Internet Gerüchte über Pennystocks gestreut
worden sein. Gomopa steht für Goldman Morgenstern & Partners Consulting LLC. Auf
ihrer Internetseite hat Gomopa „Transparenz in Sachen Finanzen, Vorsorge und
Geldanlage“ versprochen, doch ihr Chef Klaus Maurischat saß als mutmaßlicher
Betrüger schon in Untersuchungshaft.
Seit einigen Tagen ist die Internetseite www.gomopa.net offline, und es
kursieren Gerüchte über finanzielle Unregelmäßigkeiten. Immer wieder ist Gomopa
in juristische Streitigkeiten verwickelt. In einer einstweiligen Verfügung des
Landgerichts Berlin vom 31. August (Az.: 27 O 658/10) ist das Unternehmen
aufgefordert worden, nicht länger Falschinformationen über den Kasseler
Immobilienhändler Immovation AG und seinen Finanzvorstand Lars Bergmann zu
verbreiten. „Gomopa hat seinen Firmensitz bewusst in New York, weil die Firma
dort presserechtlich nicht belangt werden kann“, sagte ein Kenner des
Unternehmens der F.A.Z.”
siehe Beweis:
Klaus Maurischt wurde wegen dem Kapitalanlagebetrug an seinem eigenen
"GoMoPa"-Anleger rechtskräftig als Betrüger verurteilt:
siehe Beweis:
http://gomopa2009.wordpress.com/2009/04/18/das-urteil-gegen-den-gomopa-kriminellen-inhaber-klaus-maurischat/
weitere Informationen zu Maurischat und seinen mutmasslichen Komplizen
Gerd-Wilhelm Bennewirtz, Peter Ehlers, Volker Schmidt-Jennrich etc.. finden Sie
in der Presselounge der SJB-Opfer.
siehe Beweise:
http://sjb-fonds-opfer.com/?page_id=11764
Der mehrfach vorbestrafte Serienbetrüger Klaus Maurischat („GoMoPa“) hat ein
eigenes Portal nur für Kinder und deren „Sexualerziehung“. Dies haben der
Informationsdienst Tip-Talk und die Anleger-Opfer von http://www.sjb-fonds-opfer.com
enthüllt: http://www.gomopa4kids.net.
Hier werden User von dem mehrfach vorbestraften Betrüger (AZ: 28 Ls 85/05)
darüber aufgeklärt, was es mit der „Selbstbefriedigung“ und anderen
Sexualpraktiken angeblich auf sich hat: „Wahr oder falsch: Gerüchte über
Selbstbefriedigung! „
TipTalk kommentiert: „Wenn Sie Ihre Kinder nicht selbst aufklären können oder
wollen, sollten Sie das getrost Gomopa überlassen.
Über Selbstbefriedigung erzählt man sich immer noch verrückte Geschichten. Wir
sagen dir was stimmt und was voll
gelogen ist!
http://www.gomopa4kids.net kümmert sich gern um Ihren Nachwuchs.
http://www.gomopa4kids.net/Forum/liebe-sex-und-beziehungen/wahr-oder-falsch-geruechte-ueber-selbstbefriedigung-
p232.html#post232.“ (Inzwischen gelöscht)
siehe Beweis unter
http://sjb-fonds-opfer.com/?p=11490
Unsere Presseanfrage zu dem heiklen Thema beantworte der vorbestrafte Betrüger
erst gar nicht, sondern schickte einen Herren „Siegfried Siewert“ vor, der
versuchte mit Droh-Telefonaten und Droh-E-Mails bei uns und unseren Informanten
das Erscheinen der brisanten Informationen zu verhindern.
Siehe Beweise unter
http://sjb-fonds-opfer.com/?p=11616
und
http://sjb-fonds-opfer.com/?p=11490
Pikant dabei: „Siegfied Siewert“ ist wie viele „GoMoPa“-Kenner wissen, ein
selbstgewähltes Pseudonym für Klaus Maurischat.
Und: Die „GoMoPa“-Kinder-Webseite wird genau da gehostet, wo auch Maurischats
GoMoPa-Webpage sowie zahlreiche ihm zugerechnete Cyberstalking-Erpresserseiten
gehostet werden (siehe die Verbindungsdaten im nachfolgenden Text).
Erstaunlich ist auch, das Maurischat seinen zahlreichen Cyberstalking-Opfern
immer wieder Sexualdelikte mit Kindern vorgeworfen hat – an diesen anoynmen
Vorwürfen war natürlich in keinem Fall irgendetwas wahr.
Unser Bildtext: Klaus Maurischat: There is no Place like home
So wollte der Serienbetrüger Klaus Maurischat uns zwingen die Berichterstattung über den “NACHRICHTENDIENST” “GoMoPa” einzustellen
Meine Anmerkung: Sie lesen
den Original-Text mit den Original-Rechtschreibfehlern von Maurischat in chronologischer Reihenfolge von unten nach oben. “Unter den Linden” ist die Regus-Tarnadresse für den untergetauchten Serienbetrüger und Stasi-Ganoven. “SUMA” steht im Sprach-Jargon des “GoMoPa”-“NACHRICHTENDIENSTLERS” für Suchmaschine.
Zitat:
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA (MEINE ANTWORT)
> Was anderes fällt einem Hilfsschüler auch nicht ein! Wenn ich dich
> schnappe, dann haue ich dir die Fresse ein – mein Lieber! Merk dir
> das gut, du Kinderficker!
>
> Was sagt denn dein Freund Dr. XXX zu deinem handeln, Schwuchtel?
>
> > HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA (MEINE ANTWORT)
> >
> > > Geiles Google Suchergebniss hast du mittlerweile. Das ist sowas von
> > > geil. Am besten ist dieser Beitrag zu Deiner Magisterarbeit, du
> > > Spinner:
> > >
> > > http://scheisshausfliege.wordpress.com/2011/01/29/die-diplomarbeit-des-magisters-bernd-pulch-ein-haufen-scheisse/
> > >
> > > Wenn du nicht aufhörst, wird niemand mehr ein Stück Brot von dir
> > > nehmen. Dein Name ist dan absolut durch. Glaub mir, wir verstehen da
> > > mehr von als du Schwachkopf!
> > >
> > > Im Übrigen kannst du mich stets gern persönlich treffen. Unter den
> > > Linden 21, Berlin – habe immer für dich Feigling Zeit! (TARN-ADRESSE)
> > >
> > > So – und nun überle wann du die Artikel über uns löschen willst,
> > > sonst mache ich die erste Seite der SUMA Ergebnisse mit deinen
> > > Einträgen voll.
Become a Patron!
True Information is the most valuable resource and we ask you to give back.
In 1985, an American FBI agent began to sell intelligence to the Russians, under the alias of Ramon Garcia. It would be another 16 years before he was finally arrested by the FBI. From the Series: Spy Wars with Damian Lewis: A Perfect Traitor https://bit.ly/3bqZhB6
Become a Patron!
True Information is the most valuable resource and we ask you to give back.
Liebe Leser,
Aktenzeichen ST/0148943/2011: Immer wieder verfremden die vorbestraften Serienbetrüger Pressemeldungen von uns und der SJB-GoMoPa-Opfer und verfälschen sie, um Verwirrung zu stiften und von ihren eigenen Taten abzulenken. Die persönlichen Angriffe gegen mich und andere Personen aus meinem Umfeld, sollen uns dazu bewegen, die kritischen Berichte über die Cyber-Stasi des 21. Jahrhunderts und deren Hintermänner einzustellen, sowie sie zuvor viele andere Journalisten eingeschüchtert haben, so dass deren Beiträge dann gelöscht wurden. Im Interesse aller Marktteilnehmer werden wir das ganz gewiss NICHT tun. Dies ist uns vielmehr ein Ansporn und eine Verpflichtung, die Öffentlichkeit über das Treiben der Cybermörder und wohl auch realen Mörder aufzuklären, damit diesen Stasi-Verbrechern, das Handwerk gelegt wird und sie nicht noch mehr rechtschaffene Menschen mit ihrem hahnebüchernen Unsinn verleumden, erpressen, betrügen und sie dann sogar ermorden können. Deshalb hier noch einmal zur Klarstellung: Der vorbestrafte Erpresser, Betrüger und wohl auch mutmassliche Mörder Heinz Gerlachs Klaus-Dieter Maurischat ist auf der Flucht.
Bereits einmal, im Dezember 2008, wurde er in Berlin auf Betreiben von Meridian Capital festgenommen. Zuvor sind er und sein mutmasslicher Komplize laut Meridian Capital bereits 23 verurteilt worden. Näheres zu Maurischat: Über eine selbstgebaute Blogseite verbreiten die GoMoPa-Gangster eine gefälschte Stellung von Meridian Capital, um Verwirrung zu stiften. Diese Blogseite existiert erst seit Deztember 2010. Beweis: http://www.hypestat.com/pressreleaser.org Die Meridian Capital-Seite, das Original, http://othergomopa.blogspot.com/ ist dagegen bereits seit 2009 online Beweis: Aussage Meridian Capital und KLAUS DIETER MAURISCHAT IN DETENTION
Source: http://klaus-dieter-maurischat.blogspot.com/2009/01/klaus-dieter-maurischat-in-haft.html Hinzu kommt Verurteilung wegen Betruges am eigenen Anleger sowie die Kursmanipulation in Sachen Wirecard etc pp.- Hier exemplarisch die Verurteilung wegen Betruges am eigenen Anleger: Klaus Maurischat und Mark Vornkahl, Betreiber vonwww.gomopa.net: Am 24. April 2006 war die Verhandlung am Amtsgericht Krefeld in der Betrugssache: Mark Vornkahl / Klaus Maurischat ./. Dehnfeld. Aktenzeichen: 28 Ls 85/05 Klaus MaurischatLange Straße 3827313 Dörverden.Das in diesem Verfahren ausschließlich diese Betrugsache verhandelt wurde, ist das Urteil gegen Klaus Maurischat recht mäßig ausgefallen.
Herzlichst Ihr
Magister Bernd Pulch
Become a Patron!
True Information is the most valuable resource and we ask you to give back.
Become a Patron!
True Information is the most valuable resource and we ask you to give back.
Liebe Leser,
wie verrückt löschen die feigen STASI-Serienbetrüger und Ihre Hintermänner kritische Artikel über sie – auch unter dem Suchbegriff “Bernd Pulch”.
Die Einträge die Google gelöscht hat, waren in 90% der Fälle kritische Einträge über “GoMoPa”.
Kritisch püber uns haben sich nur “gomopa.net” und der “Sch****hausfliegenblog” von Maurischat geäussert.
Nach wie vor – besser jetzt erst recht sind die bekannten Anwälte und Hintermänner dabei ihre Taten zu vertuschen. Diesmal wird es aber nicht gelingen !
Die absurden Behauptung der Gegenseite lassen wir indes weitgehend unberührt stehen, damit Sie sich, werte Leser, ein eigenes Bild machen können.
Die im Google-Index gelöschten Beiträge von uns sind weiter auf unseren Webseiten zu finden, bis auf einige ältere INVESTMENT-Artikel aus dem letzten Jahr, die wir im Zuge einer Suchmachinen -Optimierung herausgenommen haben, da die entsprechende Rubrik “people, chat & news” gelöscht wurde.
Diese Artikel werden zeitnah wieder eingestellt und sind damit auch wieder indexiert – zumindest bis die “Anwälte” der Gegenseite sich bei Google melden.
Offensichtlich haben sie beste Verbindungen zu Google. Deswegen haben wir auch Strafanzeige gegen Google gestellt, denn ohne deren “Beihilfe” wäre das “Geschäftsmodell “GoMoPa” nicht möglich.
Wir wissen, dass Klaus-Dieter Maurischat und die “GoMoPa”-Bande den Befehl von ihren Hintermännern erhielt abzutauchen, um der Verhaftung zu entgehen.
Bei der Verhaftung würden sicher der eine oder andere Scherge “auspacken”…
We keep you informed.
Herzliche Grüsse
Magister Bernd Pulch
Become a Patron!
True Information is the most valuable resource and we ask you to give back.
German criminal police (Kriminalpolizei) has opened new cases against the notorious “GoMoPa” organisation which already fled in the underground.
On our request the German criminal police (Kriminalpolizei) has opened new cases against the notorious “GoMoPa” organisation which already fled in the underground. Insiders say they have killed German journalist and watchdog Heinz Gerlach and their criminal record is bigger than the
Encyclopedia – Britannica
The case is also directed against Google, Germany, whilst supporting criminal action of “GoMoPa” for years and therefore give them the chance to blackmail successfull businessman. This case is therefore an example and will be followed by many others as far as we can project. Furthermore we will bring the case to the attention of the German lawyers community which will not tolerate such misconduct by Googles German legal representative Dr. Arndt Haller and we will bring the case to the attention of Google Inc in Mountain View, USA, and the American ministry of Justice to stop the Cyberstalkers once and for all.
Besides that many legal institutions, individuals and firms have already contacted us to help to clarify the death of Mr. Heinz Gerlach and to prosecute his murderers and their backers.
The case number is
ST/0148943/2011
Stasi-Dioxin: The “NACHRICHTENDIENST” searching for the perfect murder
Viktor Yushchenko was running against Prime Minister Viktor Yanukovych. Yanukovych was a political ally of outgoing president Leonid Kuchma. Kuchma’s administration depended upon corruption and dishonesty for its power. Government officials ruled with a sense of terror rather than justice. For the powerful and wealthy few, having Yanukovych elected president was important. Should Yushchenko win, Ukraine’s government was sure to topple. Yushchenko’s campaign promises included a better quality of life for Ukrainians through democracy. His wife, Katherine, told CBS in a 2005 interview, “He was a great threat to the old system, where there was a great deal of corruption, where people were making millions, if not billions.”
On September 6, 2004, Yushchenko became ill after dining with leaders of the Ukrainian secret police. Unlike other social or political engagements, this dinner did not include anyone else on Yushchenko’s team. No precautions were taken regarding the food. Within hours after the dinner, Yushchenko began vomiting violently. His face became paralyzed; he could not speak or read. He developed a severe stomachache and backache as well as gastrointestinal pain. Outwardly, Yushchenko developed what is known as chloracne, a serious skin condition that leaves the face scarred and disfigured.
By December 2004, doctors had determined that Yushchenko had been the victim of dioxin poisoning. Dioxin is a name given to a group of related toxins that can cause cancer and even death. Dioxin was used in the biochemical weapon called Agent Orange during the Vietnam War controversial war in which the United States aidedSouth Vietnam in its fight against a takeover by Communist North Vietnam). Yushchenko had a dioxin level six thousand times greater than that normally found in the bloodstream. His is the second-highest level ever recorded.
Yushchenko immediately suspected he had been poisoned, though Kuchma’s camp passionately denied such allegations. Instead, when Yushchenko showed up at a parliamentary meeting shortly after the poisoning incident, Kuchma’s men teased him, saying he must have had too much to drink or was out too late the night before.
Dioxin can stay in the body for up to thirty-five years. Experts predict that his swelling and scars will fade but never completely disappear. John Henry, a toxicologist at London’s Imperial Hospital, told RedNova.com, “It’ll be a couple of years, and he will always be a bit pockmarked. After damage as heavy as that, I think he will not return to his film star looks.” And Yushchenko will live with the constant threat of cancer.
At first it was believed the poison must have come from a Russian laboratory. Russia was a strong supporter of Kuchma and lobbied against Yushchenko in the 2004 election. But by July 2005, Yushchenko’s security forces were able to trace the poison to a lab in Ukraine. Though not entirely ruling out Russia’s involvement, Yushchenko is quoted on his Web site as saying “I’m sure that even though some people are running from the investigation, we will get them. I am not afraid of anything or anybody.”
Evidence shows that such a perfect murder plotted by former Stasi agents is the cause of the death of German watchdog and journalist Heinz Gerlach.
The Ministry for State Security (German: Ministerium für Staatssicherheit (MfS), commonly known as the Stasi (IPA: [ˈʃtaziː]) (abbreviation German: Staatssicherheit, literally State Security), was the official state security service of East Germany. The MfS was headquartered in East Berlin, with an extensive complex in Berlin-Lichtenberg and several smaller facilities throughout the city. It was widely regarded as one of the most effective and repressive intelligence and secret police agencies in the world. The MfS motto was “Schild und Schwert der Partei” (Shield and Sword of the Party), that is the ruling Socialist Unity Party of Germany (SED).
According to the confessions of an informer, Berlin lawyer Jochen Resch writes most of the “articles” of the communist “STASI” agency “GoMoPa” himself or it is done by lawyers of his firm. The whistleblower states that lawyer Resch is the mastermind behind the “CYBER-STASI” called “NACHRICHTENDIENST” “GoMoPa”. Bizarre enough they use Jewish names of non-existing Jewish lawyers by the name of “Goldman, Morgenstern and Partner” to stage their bogus “firm”. Further involved in their complots are a “detective” Medard Fuchsgruber and “STASI”-Colonel Ehrenfried Stelzer, “the first crime expert” in the former communist East-Germany.
According to London based Meridian Capital hundreds and thousands of wealthy people and companies have paid to the “NACHRICHTENDIENST” to avoid their cyberstalking (see article below).
Finally the German criminal police started their investigations (case number ST/0148943/2011).
The “NACHRICHTENDIENST” is also involved in the death of the well-known German watchdog and journalist Heinz Gerlach who died under strange circumstances in July 2010.
Only hours after his death the “NACHRICHTENDIENST” was spreading the news that Mr Gerlach died of blood pollution and set the stage for a fairy tale. Months before his death the “NACHRICHTENDIENST” started a campaign to ruin his reputation and presumably was also responsable for cyberattacks to bring his website down. In fact they presumably used the same tactics also against our servers. Therefore we investigated all internet details of them and handed the facts to the FBI and international authorities.
Story background:
Now it seems the STASI is back again in business after transforming it in to the CYBER-STASI of the 21st Century.
The serial betrayer and cyberstalker Klaus Maurischat is on the run again. The latest action against him (see below) cause him to react in a series of fake statements and “press releases” – one more absurd than the other. Insider analyze that his criminal organisation “GoMoPa” is about to fade away.
On our request the German criminal police (Kriminalpolizei) has opened new cases against the notorious “GoMoPa” organisation which already fled in the underground. Insiders say they have killed German journalist and watchdog Heinz Gerlach and their criminal record is bigger than the Encyclopedia – Britannica
The case is also directed against Google, Germany, whilst supporting criminal action of “GoMoPa” for years and therefore give them the chance to blackmail successfull businessman. This case is therefore an example and will be followed by many others as far as we can project. Furthermore we will bring the case to the attention of the German lawyers community which will not tolerate such misconduct by Googles German legal representative Dr. Arndt Haller and we will bring the case to the attention of Google Inc in Mountain View, USA, and the American ministry of Justice to stop the Cyberstalkers once and for all.
Besides that many legal institutions, individuals and firms have already contacted us to help to clarify the death of Mr. Heinz Gerlach and to prosecute his murderers and their backers.
The case number is ST/0148943/2011
In a series of interviews beginning 11 months before the sudden death of German watchdog Heinz Gerlach Berlin lawyer Joschen Resch unveilved secrets of Gerlach, insiders say. Secret documents from Mr Gerlachs computer were published on two dubious hostile German websites. Both have a lot of similarities in their internet registration. One the notorious “GoMoPa” website belongs to a n Eastern German organization which calls itself “
Numerous attempts have been made to stop our research and the publication of the stories by “GoMoPa” members in camouflage thus confirming the truth and the substance of it in a superior way.
Only two articles let the German audience believe that the famous journalist and watchdog Heinz Gerlach died on natural courses by blood pollution. The first one, published only hours after the death of Mr Heinz Gerlach by the notorious “GoMoPa” (see article below) and a second 3 days later by a small German local newspaper, Weserbergland Nachrichten.
Many people including the hostile Gerlach website “Akte Heinz Gerlach” doubted that this man who had so many enemies and friends would die of natural causes without any previous warning. Rumours occured that Mr. Gerlach’s doctor doubted natural courses at all. After many critical voices discussed the issue a small website of a small German local newspaper – which never before had reported about Mr. Heinz Gerlach and which is not even in the region of Mr Gerlachs home – published that Mr Gerlach died of blood pollution. Weserbergland-Nachrichten published a long article about the deadly consequences of blood pollution and did not even name the source of such an important statement. It claimed only that somebody of Gerlachs inner circle had said this. It is a proven fact that after the collpase of the Eastern German Communist Regime many former Communist propaganda agents went to regional newspapers – often in Western Germany like Günther Schabowski did the man who opened the “Mauer”.
The theatre stage was set: One day later the hostile Gerlach website “Akte Heinz Gerlach” took the agenda publishing that Mr Gerlach had died for natural causes without any further research at all.
This was done by a website which for months and months and months reported everything about Mr. Gerlach.
Furthermore a research proves that the technical details regarding the website hosting of this hostile website “Akte Heinz Gerlach” proves that there are common details with the hosting of “GoMoPa” and their affiliates as proven by the SJB-GoMoPa-victims (see http://www.sjb-fonds-opfer.com)
Insiders believe that the murderers of Mr. Heinz Gerlach are former members of the Eastern German Terror Organisation “Stasi” with dioxins. They also believe that “GoMoPa” was part of the plot. At “GoMoPa”’ a person named Siegfried Siewers was officialy responsible for the press but never appeared in public. “GoMoPa”-victims say that this name was a cameo for “GoMoPa” frontrunner Klaus Maurischat who is controlled by the Stasi Top Agent Ehrenfried Stelzner, Berlin.
Siegfried Sievers, a former Stasi member is responsible for the pollution of millions Germanys for many years with dioxins. This was unveiled at 5th of January 2011 by German prosecutors.
The victims say that Maurischat (probably also a Stasi cameo) and Sievers were in contact as Sievers acted as Stasi Agent and was in fact already a specialist in dioxins under the Communist Terror Regime in Eastern Germany.
Furthermore the Stasi Top Agent Ehrenfried Stelzer disguised as Professor for Criminal studies during the Communist Regime at the Eastern Berlin Humboldt University.
Background:
The man behind the Berlin lawyer Jochen Resch and his activities is Ehrenfried Stelzer, former Stasi Top officer in Berlin and “Professor for Criminal Studies” at the Eastern Berlin Humboldt University during the Communist regime, the SJB-GoMoPa-victims say (www.sjb-fonds-opfer.com) is responsable for the killing of German watchdog and journalist Heinz Gerlach.
These informations stem from various sources who were close to the criminal organization of GoMoPa in the last years. The SJB-GoMoPa say that the well-known German watchdog and journalist Heinz Gerlach was killed by former Stasi members with dioxins. Polychlorinated dibenzodioxins (PCDDs), or simply dioxins, are a group of organic polyhalogenated compounds that are significant because they act as environmental pollutants. They are commonly referred to as dioxins for simplicity in scientific publications because every PCDD molecule contains a dioxin skeletal structure. Typically, the p-dioxin skeleton is at the core of a PCDD molecule, giving the molecule a dibenzo-p-dioxin ring system. Members of the PCDD family have been shown to bioaccumulate in humans and wildlife due to their lipophilic properties, and are known teratogens, mutagens, and confirmed (avered) human carcinogens. They are organic compounds.
Dioxins build up primarily in fatty tissues over time (bioaccumulate), so even small exposures may eventually reach dangerous levels. In 1994, the US EPA reported that dioxins are a probable carcinogen, but noted that non-cancer effects (reproduction and sexual development, immune system) may pose an even greater threat to human health. TCDD, the most toxic of the dibenzodioxins, is classified as a Group 1 carcinogen by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC).
In 2004, a notable individual case of dioxin poisoning, Ukrainian politician Viktor Yushchenko was exposed to the second-largest measured dose of dioxins, according to the reports of the physicians responsible for diagnosing him. This is the first known case of a single high dose of TCDD dioxin poisoning, and was diagnosed only after a toxicologist recognized the symptoms of chloracne while viewing television news coverage of his condition.
German dioxin scandal: In January 2011 about 4700 German farms were banned from making deliveries after tests at the Harles und Jentzsch plant in the state of Schleswig-Holstein showed high levels of dioxin. Again this incident appears to involve PCBs and not PCDDs at all. Dioxin were found in animal feed and eggs in many farms. The person who is responsible for this, Siegfried Sievert is also a former Stasi Agent. At “GoMoPa” the notorious Eastern-Berlin press agency (see article below) one of the henchmen acted under the name of “Siegfried Siewert”.
Further evidence for the killing of Mr.Heinz Gerlach is provided by the SJB-GoMoPa-victims by analyzing the dubious role of former Stasi-Top-agent Ehrenfried Stelzer, also a former “Professor for Crime Studies” under the Communist regime in Eastern Germany and the dubious role of “detective” Medard Fuchsgruber. Both are closely tied to the dubious “GoMoPa” and Berlin lawyer Jochen Resch.
According to the SJB-GoMoPa-victims is Berlin lawyer Jochen Resch the mastermind of the criminal organization “GoMoPa2. The victims state that they have a source inside “GoMoPa” who helped them discover the shocking truth. The so-called “Deep Throat from Berlin” has information that Resch had the idea to found the criminal organization “GoMoPa” and use non-existing Jewish lawyers named Goldman, Morgenstern & Partner as camouflage. Their “office” in Madison Avenue, New York, is a mailbox. This is witnessed by a German Ex-Patriot, a lawyer, whose father, Heinz Gerlach, died under strange circumstances.
Resch seems to use “GoMoPa” as an instrument to blackmail parts of the German Property and Investment section.
-“Worse than the Gestapo.” —Simon Wiesenthal, Nazi hunter said about the notorious “Stasi”.
Less than a month after German demonstrators began to tear down the Berlin Wall on November 9, 1989, irate East German citizens stormed the Leipzig district office of the Ministry for State Security (MfS)—the Stasi, as it was more commonly called. Not a shot was fired, and there was no evidence of “street justice” as Stasi officers surrendered meekly and were peacefully led away. The following month, on January 15, hundreds of citizens sacked Stasi headquarters in Berlin. Again there was no bloodshed. The last bit of unfinished business was accomplished on May 31 when the Stasi radioed its agents in West Germany to fold their tents and come home.
The intelligence department of the Nationale Volksarmee (NVA), the People’s Army, had done the same almost a week earlier, but with what its members thought was better style. In-stead of sending the five-digit code groups that it had used for decades to message its spies in West Germany, the army group broadcast a male choir singing a children’s ditty about a duck swimming on a lake. There was no doubt that the singing spymasters had been drowning their sorrow over losing the Cold War in schnapps. The giggling, word-slurring songsters repeated the refrain three times: “Dunk your little head in the water and lift your little tail.” This was the signal to agents under deep cover that it was time to come home.
With extraordinary speed and political resolve, the divided nation was reunified a year later. The collapse of the despotic regime was total. It was a euphoric time for Germans, but reunification also produced a new national dilemma. Nazi war crimes were still being tried in West Germany, forty-six years after World War II. Suddenly the German government was faced with demands that the communist officials who had ordered, executed, and abetted crimes against their own people—crimes that were as brutal as those perpetrated by their Nazi predecessors—also be prosecuted.
The people of the former Deutsche Demokratische Republik (DDR), the German Democratic Republic, as the state had called itself for forty years, were clamoring for instant revenge. Their wrath was directed primarily against the country’s communist rulers—the upper echelon of the Sozialistische Einheitspartei (SED), the Socialist Unity Party. The tens of thousands of second-echelon party functionaries who had enriched themselves at the expense of their cocitizens were also prime targets for retribution.
Particularly singled out were the former members of the Stasi, the East German secret police, who previously had considered themselves the “shield and sword” of the party. When the regime collapsed, the Stasi had 102,000 full-time officers and noncommissioned personnel on its rolls, including 11,000 members of the ministry’s own special guards regiment. Between 1950 and 1989, a total of 274,000 persons served in the Stasi.
The people’s ire was running equally strong against the regular Stasi informers, the inoffizielle Mitarbeiter (IMs). By 1995, 174,000 had been identified as IMs, or 2.5 percent of the total population between the ages of 18 and 60. Researchers were aghast when they found that about 10,000 IMs, or roughly 6 percent of the total, had not yet reached the age of 18. Since many records were destroyed, the exact number of IMs probably will never be determined; but 500,000 was cited as a realistic figure. Former Colonel Rainer Wiegand, who served in the Stasi counterintelligence directorate, estimated that the figure could go as high as 2 million, if occasional stool pigeons were included.
“The Stasi was much, much worse than the Gestapo, if you consider only the oppression of its own people,” according to Simon Wiesenthal of Vienna, Austria, who has been hunting Nazi criminals for half a century. “The Gestapo had 40,000 officials watching a country of 80 million, while the Stasi employed 102,000 to control only 17 million.” One might add that the Nazi terror lasted only twelve years, whereas the Stasi had four decades in which to perfect its machinery of oppression, espionage, and international terrorism and subversion.
To ensure that the people would become and remain submissive, East German communist leaders saturated their realm with more spies than had any other totalitarian government in recent history. The Soviet Union’s KGB employed about 480,000 full-time agents to oversee a nation of 280 million, which means there was one agent per 5,830 citizens. Using Wiesenthal’s figures for the Nazi Gestapo, there was one officer for 2,000 people. The ratio for the Stasi was one secret policeman per 166 East Germans. When the regular informers are added, these ratios become much higher: In the Stasi’s case, there would have been at least one spy watching every 66 citizens! When one adds in the estimated numbers of part-time snoops, the result is nothing short of monstrous: one informer per 6.5 citizens. It would not have been unreasonable to assume that at least one Stasi informer was present in any party of ten or twelve dinner guests.
THE STASI OCTOPUS
Like a giant octopus, the Stasi’s tentacles probed every aspect of life. Full-time officers were posted to all major industrial plants. Without exception, one tenant in every apartment build-ing was designated as a watchdog reporting to an area representative of the Volkspolizei (Vopo), the People’s Police. In turn, the police officer was the Stasi’s man. If a relative or friend came to stay overnight, it was reported. Schools, universities, and hospitals were infiltrated from top to bottom. German academe was shocked to learn that Heinrich Fink, professor of theology and vice chancellor at East Berlin’s Humboldt University, had been a Stasi informer since 1968. After Fink’s Stasi connections came to light, he was summarily fired. Doctors, lawyers, journalists, writers, actors, and sports figures were co-opted by Stasi officers, as were waiters and hotel personnel. Tapping about 100,000 telephone lines in West Germany and West Berlin around the clock was the job of 2,000 officers.
Stasi officers knew no limits and had no shame when it came to “protecting the party and the state.” Churchmen, including high officials of both Protestant and Catholic denomina-tions, were recruited en masse as secret informers. Their offices and confessionals were infested with eavesdropping devices. Even the director of Leipzig’s famous Thomas Church choir, Hans-Joachim Rotch, was forced to resign when he was unmasked as a Spitzel, the people’s pejorative for a Stasi informant.
Absolutely nothing was sacred to the secret police. Tiny holes were bored in apartment and hotel room walls through which Stasi agents filmed their “suspects” with special video cam-eras. Even bathrooms were penetrated by the communist voyeurs.8 Like the Nazi Gestapo, the Stasi was the sinister side of deutsche Gründlichkeit (German thoroughness).
After the Berlin wall came down, the victims of the DDR regime demanded immediate retribution. Ironically, their demands were countered by their fellow Germans in the West who, living in freedom, had diligently built einen demokratischen Rechtsstaat, a democratic state governed by the rule of law. The challenge of protecting the rights of both the victims and the accused was immense, given the emotions surrounding the issue. Government leaders and democratic politicians recognized that there could be no “quick fix” of communist injustices without jeopardizing the entire system of democratic jurisprudence. Moving too rapidly merely to satisfy the popular thirst for revenge might well have resulted in acquittals or mistrials. Intricate jurisdictional questions needed to be resolved with both alacrity and meticulousness. No German government could afford to allow a perpetrator to go free because of a judicial error. The political fallout from any such occurrence, especially in the East, could prove fatal to whatever political party occupied the chancellor’s office in Bonn at the time.
Politicians and legal scholars of the “old federal states,” or West Germany, counseled patience, pointing out that even the prosecution of Nazi criminals had not yet been completed. Before unification, Germans would speak of Vergangenheitsbewältigung (“coming to grips with the past”) when they discussed dealing with Nazi crimes. In the reunited Germany, this word came to imply the communist past as well. The two were considered comparable especially in the area of human rights violations. Dealing with major Nazi crimes, however, was far less complicated for the Germans: Adolf Hitler and his Gestapo and Schutzstaffel (SS) chief, Heinrich Himmler, killed themselves, as did Luftwaffe chief and Vice Chancellor Hermann Göring, who also had been the first chief of the Gestapo. The victorious Allies prosecuted the rest of the top leadership at the International War Crimes Tribunal in Nürnberg. Twelve were hanged, three received life terms, four were sentenced to lesser terms of imprisonment (up to twenty years), and three were acquitted.
The cases of communist judges and prosecutors accused of Rechtsbeugung (perversion of justice) are more problematic. According to Franco Werkenthin, a Berlin legal expert charged with analyzing communist crimes for the German parliament, those sitting in judgment of many of the accused face a difficult task because of the general failure of German justice after World War II. Not a single judge or prosecutor who served the Nazi regime was brought to account for having perverted justice—even those who had handed down death sentences for infringements that in a democracy would have been considered relatively minor offenses. Werkenthin called this phenomenon die Jauche der Justiz, the cesspool of justice.
Of course, the crimes committed by the communists were not nearly as heinous as the Nazis’ extermination of the Jews, or the mass murders in Nazi-occupied territories. However, the communists’ brutal oppression of the nation by means including murder alongside legal execution put the SED leadership on a par with Hitler’s gang. In that sense, Walter Ulbricht or Erich Honecker (Ulbricht’s successor as the party’s secretary-general and head of state) and secret police chief Erich Mielke can justifiably be compared to Hitler and Himmler, respectively.
Arrest warrants were issued for Honecker and Mielke. The Soviet government engineered Honecker’s escape to Moscow, where he became the ward of Soviet President Mikhail S. Gor-bachev. When the Soviet Union crumbled, the new Russian President Boris Yeltsin expelled Honecker. He was arrested on his return to Germany, but a court decided against a trial when he was diagnosed with liver cancer. Honecker flew to Chile with his wife Margot to live with their daughter, a Chilean citizen by marriage. His exile was short, and he died in 1994. Mielke was not so fortunate: His KGB friends turned their backs on him. He was tried in Germany for the 1931 murder of two police officers, found guilty, and sentenced to six years in prison. Other charges, including manslaughter, were dismissed because of his advanced age and poor health.
Three other members of the twenty-one-member ruling Politburo also have been tried. Former Defense Minister Heinz Kessler was convicted of manslaughter in connection with the order to kill people who were trying to escape to the West. He received a seven-and-a-half-year term. Two others, members of the Central Committee and the National Defense Council, were tried with Kessler and sentenced to seven and a half years and five years, respectively. Politburo member Harry Tisch, who was also head of the communist trade union, was found guilty of embezzlement and served eighteen months. Six others, including Egon Krenz (Honecker’s successor as party chief), were charged with manslaughter. Krenz was found guilty, and on August 25, 1997, was sentenced to six and a half years in prison.
However, eight years after reunification, many of the 165 members of the Central Committee have not yet been put under investigation. In 1945, Nazis holding comparable or lesser positions were subject to automatic arrest by the Allies. They spent months or even years in camps while their cases were adjudicated. Moreover, the Nürnberg Tribunal branded the Reich and its Corps of Political Leaders, SS, Security Service (SD), Secret State Police (Gestapo), SA (Storm Troopers), and Armed Forces High Command criminal organizations. Similarly sweeping actions against communist leaders and functionaries such as Stasi officers were never contemplated, even though tens of thousands of political trials and human rights abuses have been documented. After the East German regime fell, German judicial authorities scrupulously avoided the appearance of waging witch-hunts or using the law as a weapon of vengeance. Prosecutors and judges made great efforts to be fair, often suspending legal action while requesting rulings from the supreme court on possible constitutional conflicts.
The victims of oppression clamored for revenge and demanded speedy prosecution of the erstwhile tyrants. They had little patience for a judicial system that was handicapped by a lack of unblemished and experienced criminal investigators, prosecutors, and judges. Despite these handicaps, the Berlin Central Police Investigations Group for Government Criminality, mindful that the statute of limitations for most communist crimes would expire at the end of 1999, made significant progress under its director Manfred Kittlaus, the able former director of the West Berlin state police. Kittlaus’s major task in 1998 was to investigate wrongful deaths, including 73 murders, 30 attempted murders, 583 cases of manslaughter, 2,938 instances of attempted manslaughter, and 425 other suspicious deaths. Of the 73 murders, 22 were classified as contract murders.
One of those tried and convicted for attempted contract murder was former Stasi collaborator Peter Haak, who was sentenced to six and a half years in prison. The fifty-two-year-old Haak took part in the Stasi’s 1981 Operation Scorpion, which was designed to pursue people who helped East Germans escape to the West. Proceedings against former General Gerhard Neiber, whose Stasi directorate was responsible for preventing escapes and for wreaking vengeance, were still pending in 1998.
Peter Haak’s murder plot was hatched after he befriended Wolfgang Welsch and his family. Welsch was a thorn in the side of the Stasi because of his success in smuggling people out of the DDR. Haak joined Welsch and the latter’s wife and seven-year-old daughter on a vacation in Israel, where he mixed a gram of thallium, a highly poisonous metallic chemical element used in rat poison, into the hamburgers he was preparing for a meal. Welsch’s wife and daughter vomited immediately after ingesting the poison and recovered quickly. Welsch suffered severe aftereffects, but eventually recovered: He had consumed a large amount of beer with the meal, and an expert testified that the alcohol had probably flushed the poison from his system.
Berlin Prosecutor General Christoph Schäfgen revealed that after the DDR’s demise 15,200 investigations had been launched, of which more than 9,000 were still active at the beginning of 1995. Indictments were handed down in 153 cases, and 73 perpetrators were convicted. Among those convicted were the aforementioned Politburo members as well as a number of border guards who had killed people who were trying to escape to the West.
Despite widespread misgivings about the judicial failures in connection with some Nazi crimes, a number of judges and prosecutors were convicted and jailed for up to three years for perversion of justice. In collusion with the Stasi, they had requested or handed down more severe sentences in political cases so that the state could collect greater amounts when the “convicts” were ransomed by the West German government. {The amount of ransom paid was governed by the time a prisoner had been sentenced to serve.)
The enormity of the task facing judicial authorities in reunified Germany becomes starkly evident when one examines the actions they have taken in all five former East German prov-inces and in East Berlin. From the end of 1990 to July 1996, 52,050 probes were launched into charges of murder, attempted murder, manslaughter, kidnapping, election fraud, and per-version of justice. A total of 29,557 investigations were halted for various reasons including death, severe illness, old age, or insufficient evidence. In those five and a half years, there were only 139 convictions.
The problem is even more staggering when cases of espionage are included. Between 1990 and 1996, the office of the federal prosecutor general launched 6,641 probes, of which 2,431 were terminated before trial—most due to the statute of limitations. Of 175 indictments on charges of espionage, 95 resulted in convictions. In addition to the cases handled at the federal level, the prosecutor general referred 3,926 investigations to state authorities, who terminated 3,344 without trial. State courts conducted 356 trials, resulting in 248 convictions. Because the statute of limitations for espionage is five years, the prosecutor general’s office told me in 1997 it was unlikely that more espionage trials would be conducted.
It is important to emphasize the difference between the statute’s application to so-called government crimes committed in East Germany before the collapse and to crimes, such as es-pionage, committed in West Germany. The Unification Treaty specifically permits the belated prosecution of individuals who committed acts that were punishable under the East German criminal code and who due to official connivance were not prosecuted earlier. There is no statute of limitations for murder. For most other crimes the limit is five years; however, due to the obstacles created by previous government connivance, the German parliament in 1993 doubled this time limit for prosecution of the more serious crimes. At the same time, the par-liament decreed that all cases must be adjudicated by the end of 2002. For less serious offenses, the statute would have run out on December 31, 1997, but the parliament extended it to 2000.
A number of politicians, jurists, and liberal journalists pleaded for a general amnesty for crimes committed by former DDR leaders and Communist Party functionaries. A former West German supreme court judge, Ernst Mahrenholz, said the “sharp sword of justice prevents reconciliation.” Schäfgen, the Berlin prosecutor general, had this answer for the former high court judge and other amnesty advocates:
I cannot agree. We are raising no special, sharp sword against East Germans. We must pursue state-sponsored injustice in exactly the same manner as we do when a thief steals or when one human being kills another. If one wants to change that, then we would have to do away with the entire criminal justice system, because punishment always hurts. We are not criminalizing an entire people but only an ever shrinking, small portion.
German Foreign Minister Klaus Kinkel, who was West Germany’s minister of justice when the nation was unified, said this at a session of parliament in September 1991: “We must punish the perpetrators. This is not a matter of a victor’s justice. We owe it to the ideal of justice and to the victims. All of those who ordered injustices and those who executed the orders must be punished; the top men of the SED as well as the ones who shot [people] at the wall.” Aware that the feelings against communists were running high among their victims, Kinkel pointed to past revolutions after which the representatives of the old system were collectively liquidated. In the same speech before parliament, he said:
Such methods are alien to a state ruled by law. Violence and vengeance are incompatible with the law in any case. At the same time, we cannot tolerate that the problems are swept under the rug as a way of dealing with a horrible past, because the results will later be disastrous for society. We Germans know from our own experience where this leads. Jewish philosophy formulates it in this way: “The secret of redemption is called remembering.”
Defense attorneys for communist officials have maintained that the difficulty lies in the fact that hundreds of thousands of political opponents were tried under laws of the DDR. Although these laws were designed to smother political dissent and grossly violated basic human rights and democratic norms, they were nonetheless laws promulgated by a sovereign state. How could one justly try individual Stasi officers, prosecutors, and judges who had simply been fulfilling their legal responsibility to pursue and punish violators of the law?
Opinions varied widely on whether and how the Stasi and other perpetrators of state-sponsored crimes should be tried. Did the laws of the DDR, as they existed before reunification, still apply in the east? Or was the criminal code of the western part of the country the proper instrument of justice in reunified Germany? However, these questions were moot: As Rupert Scholz, professor of law at the University of Munich and a Christian Democratic member of parliament, pointed out, the Unification Treaty specifies that the penal code of the DDR and not that of the Federal Republic of Germany (FRG) shall be applied to offenses committed in East Germany. Scholz’s view was upheld by the Bundesverfassungsgericht, the supreme court. Most offenses committed by party functionaries and Stasi officers—murder, kidnapping, torture, illegal wiretapping, mail robbery, and fraud—were subject to prosecution in reunified Germany under the DDR’s penal code. But this would not satisfy the tens of thousands of citizens who had been sent to prison under East German laws covering purely political offenses for which there was no West German equivalent.
Nevertheless, said Scholz, judicial authorities were by no means hamstrung, because West Germany had never recognized the East German state according to international law. “We have always said that we are one nation; that the division of Germany led neither to full recognition under international law nor, concomitantly, to a recognition of the legal system of the DDR,” Scholz said. Accordingly, West German courts have consistently maintained that West German law protects all Germans equally, including those living in the East. Therefore, no matter where the crimes were committed, whether in the East or the West, all Germans have always been subject to West German laws. Applying this logic, East German border guards who had either killed or wounded persons trying to escape to the West could be tried under the jurisdiction of West Germany.
The “one nation” principle was not upheld by the German supreme court. Prior to the court’s decision, however, Colonel General Markus Wolf, chief of the Stasi’s foreign espionage directorate, and some of his officers who personally controlled agents from East Berlin had been tried for treason and convicted. Wolf had been sentenced to six years in prison. The su-preme court ruling overturned that verdict and those imposed on Wolf’s cohorts, even though they had obtained the most closely held West German secrets and handed them over to the KGB. The maximum penalty for Landesverrat, or treason, is life imprisonment. In vacating Wolf’s sentence, the court said he could not be convicted because he operated only from East German territory and under East German law.
However, Wolf was reindicted on charges of kidnapping and causing bodily harm, crimes also punishable under East German law. The former Stasi three-star general, on March 24, 1955, had approved in writing a plan to kidnap a woman who worked for the U.S. mission in West Berlin. The woman and her mother were tricked by a Stasi agent whom the woman had been teaching English, and voluntarily got into his car. He drove them into the Soviet sector of the divided city, where they were seized by Stasi officers. The woman was subjected to psychological torture and threatened with imprisonment unless she signed an agreement to spy for the Stasi. She agreed. On her return to the American sector, however, the woman reported the incident to security officials. Wolf had committed a felony punishable by up to fifteen years’ imprisonment in West Germany. He was found guilty in March 1977 and sentenced to two years’ probation.
Those who have challenged the application of the statute of limitations to communist crimes, especially to the executions of citizens fleeing to the West, have drawn parallels to the notorious executive orders of Adolf Hitler. Hitler issued orders mandating the summary execution of Soviet Army political commissars upon their capture and initiating the extermination of Jews. An early postwar judicial decision held that these orders were equivalent to law. When that law was declared illegal and retroactively repealed by the West German Bundestag, the statute of limitations was suspended—that is, it never took effect. Many of those convicted in subsequent trials of carrying out the Führer’s orders were executed by the Allies. The German supreme court has ruled the same way as the Bundestag on the order to shoot people trying to escape to West Germany, making the statute of limitations inapplicable to such cases. The ruling made possible the trial of members of the National Defense Council who took part in formulating or promulgating the order. A number of border guards who had shot would-be escapees also have been tried and convicted.
Chief Prosecutor Heiner Sauer, former head of the West German Central Registration Office for Political Crimes, was particularly concerned with the border shootings. His office, located in Salzgitter, West Germany, was established in 1961 as a direct consequence of the Berlin Wall, which was erected on August 13 of that year. Willy Brandt, at the time the city’s mayor (later federal chancellor) had decided that crimes committed by East German border guards should be recorded. At his behest, a central registry of all shootings and other serious border incidents was instituted. Between August 13, 1961 and the opening of the borders on November 9, 1989, 186 border killings were registered. But when the Stasi archives were opened, investigators found that at least 825 people had paid with their lives for trying to escape to the West. This figure was reported to the court that was trying former members of the National Defense Council. In addition to these border incidents, the registry also had recorded a number of similar political offenses committed in the interior of the DDR: By fall 1991, Sauer’s office had registered 4,444 cases of actual or attempted killings and about 40,000 sentences handed down by DDR courts for “political offenses.”
During the early years of Sauer’s operation, the details of political prosecutions became known only when victims were ransomed by West Germany or were expelled. Between 1963 and 1989, West Germany paid DM5 billion (nearly US$3 billion) to the communist regime for the release of 34,000 political prisoners. The price per head varied according to the importance of the person or the length of the sentence. In some cases the ransom amounted to more than US$56,000. The highest sum ever paid to the East Germans appears to have been DM450,000 (US$264,705 using an exchange rate of US$1.70 to the mark). The ransom “object” in this case was Count Benedikt von Hoensbroech. A student in his early twenties, von Hoensbroech was attending a West Berlin university when the wall went up. He was caught by the Stasi while trying to help people escape and was sentenced to ten years at hard labor. The case at-tracted international attention because his family was related to Queen Fabiola of Belgium, who interceded with the East Germans. Smelling money, the East German government first demanded the equivalent of more than US$1 million from the young man’s father as ransom. In the end, the parties settled on the figure of DM450,000, of which the West German gov-ernment paid DM40,000 (about $23,529). Such ransom operations were fully controlled by the Stasi.
Political prisoners released in the DDR could not be registered by the West Germans because their cases remained secret. The victims were admonished to keep quiet or face another prison term. Nonetheless, in the first year after reunification, Sauer’s office added another 20,000 documented cases, for a total of 60,000. Sauer said he believed the final figure of all political prosecutions would be somewhere around 300,000. In every case, the Stasi was involved either in the initial arrest or in pretrial interrogations during which “confessions” were usually extracted by physical or psychological torture, particularly between the mid-1940s and the mid-1960s.
Until 1987, the DDR imposed the death penalty for a number of capital crimes, including murder, espionage, and economic offenses. But after the mid-1950s, nearly all death sentences were kept quiet and executions were carried out in the strictest secrecy, initially by guillotine and in later years by a single pistol shot to the neck. In most instances, the relatives of those killed were not informed either of the sentence or of the execution. The corpses were cremated and the ashes buried secretly, sometimes at construction sites. In reporting about one executioner who shot more than twenty persons to death, the Berlin newspaper Bildzeitung said that a total of 170 civilians had been executed in East Germany. However, Franco Werkenthin, the Berlin official investigating DDR crimes, said he had documented at least three hundred executions. He declined to say how many were for political offenses, because he had not yet submitted his report to parliament. “But it was substantial,” he told me. The true number of executions may never be known because no complete record of death sentences meted out by civil courts could be found. Other death sentences were handed down by military courts, and many records of those are also missing. In addition, German historian Günther Buch believes that about two hundred members of the Stasi itself were executed for various crimes, including attempts to escape to the West.
SAFEGUARDING HUMAN DIGNITY?
The preamble to the East German criminal code stated that the purpose of the code was to “safeguard the dignity of humankind, its freedom and rights under the aegis of the criminal code of the socialist state,” and that “a person can be prosecuted under the criminal code only in strictest concurrence with the law.” However, many of the codified offenses for which East German citizens were prosecuted and imprisoned were unique to totalitarian regimes, both fascist and communist.
Moreover, certain sections of the code, such as those on “Treasonable Relaying of Information” and “Treasonable Agent Activity,” were perversely applied, landing countless East Germans in maximum security penitentiaries. The victims of this perversion of justice usually were persons who had requested legal exit permits from the DDR authorities and had been turned down. In many cases, their “crime” was having contacted a Western consulate to inquire about immigration procedures. Sentences of up to two and a half years’ hard labor were not unusual as punishment for such inquiries.
Engaging in “propaganda hostile to the state” was another punishable offense. In one such case, a young man was arrested and prosecuted for saying that it was not necessary to station tanks at the border and for referring to border fortifications as “nonsense.” During his trial, he “admitted” to owning a television set on which he watched West German programs and later told friends what he saw. One of those “friends” had denounced him to the Stasi. The judge considered the accused’s actions especially egregious and sentenced him to a year and a half at hard labor.
Ironically, another part of this section of the criminal code decreed that “glorifying militarism” also was a punishable offense, although the DDR itself “glorified” its People’s Army beyond any Western norm. That army was clad in uniforms and insignia identical to those of the Nazi Wehrmacht, albeit without eagles and swastikas. The helmets, too, were differently shaped, but the Prussian goose step was regulation during parades.
A nineteen-year-old who had placed a sign in an apartment window reading “When justice is turned into injustice, resistance becomes an obligation!” was rewarded with twenty-two months in the penitentiary. Earlier, the youth had applied for an exit visa and had been turned down. A thirty-four-year-old father of two who also had been denied permission to leave the “workers’ and peasants’ state” with his family similarly advertised that fact with a poster reading “We want to leave, but they won’t let us.” The man went to prison for sixteen months. The “crimes” of both men were covered by a law on “Interference in Activities of the State or Society.”
Two letters—one to a friend in West Germany, seeking assistance to legally emigrate to the West, and another containing a similar appeal to Chief of State Honecker—brought a four-year sentence to their writer, who was convicted under two laws: those on “establishing illegal contacts” (writing to his friend) and on “public denigration” (writing to Honecker). The Stasi had illegally intercepted both letters.
The East German party chiefs were not content to rely only on the Stasi’s millions of informers to ferret out antistate sentiments. Leaving nothing to chance, they created a law that made the failure to denounce fellow citizens a crime punishable by up to five years’ imprisonment. One man was sentenced to twenty-three months for failing to report that a friend of his was preparing to escape to the West. The mandatory denunciation law had its roots in the statutes of the Socialist Unity Party, which were published in the form of a little red booklet. I picked up a copy of this booklet that had been discarded by its previous owner, a Stasi chauffeur, who had written “Ha, Ha” next to the mandate to “report any misdeeds, regardless of the person responsible, to leading party organs, all the way up to the Central Committee.”
Rupert Scholz, member of parliament and professor of law at the University of Munich, said many East Germans feel there is little determination among their Western brethren to bring the Stasi criminals to trial. “In fact, we already have heard many of them say that the peaceful revolution should have been a bloody one instead so they could have done away with their tormentors by hanging them posthaste,” Scholz told me.
The Reverend Joachim Gauck, minister to a Lutheran parish in East Germany, shared the people’s pessimism that justice would be done. Following reunification, Gauck was appointed by the Bonn government as its special representative for safeguarding and maintaining the Stasi archives. “We must at least establish a legal basis for finding the culprits in our files,” Gauck told me. “But it will not be easy. If you stood the millions of files upright in one line, they would stretch for 202 kilometers [about 121 miles]. In those files you can find an unbe-lievable number of Stasi victims and their tormentors.”
Gauck was given the mandate he needed in November 1991, when the German parliament passed a law authorizing file searches to uncover Stasi perpetrators and their informants. He viewed this legislation as first step in the right direction. With the evidence from Stasi files, the perpetrators could be removed from their public service jobs without any formal legal pro-ceedings. Said Gauck: “We needed this law badly. It is not reasonable that persons who served this apparatus of oppression remain in positions of trust. We need to win our people over to accepting that they are now free and governed by the rule of law. To achieve that, we must build up their confidence and trust in the public service.”
Searching the roughly six million files will take years. A significant number of the dossiers are located in repositories of the Stasi regional offices, sprinkled throughout eastern Germany. To put the files at the Berlin central repository in archival order would take one person 128 years. The job might have been made easier had the last DDR government not ordered the burning of thousands of Stasi computer tapes, ostensibly to forestall a witch-hunt. Thousands of files dealing with espionage were shredded and packed into 17,200 paper sacks. These were discovered when the Stasi headquarters was stormed on January 15, 1990. The contents of all of these bags now have been inspected. It took two workers between six and eight weeks to go through one bag. Then began the work of the puzzlers, putting the shredded pieces together. By the middle of 1997, fewer than 500 bags of shredded papers had been reconstructed—into about 200,000 pages. Further complicating matters was the lack of trained archivists and experts capable of organizing these files—to say nothing of the 37.5 million index cards bearing the names of informers as well as persons under Stasi surveillance—and interpreting their contents. Initially, funding for a staff of about 550 individuals was planned, at a total of about DM24.5 million annually (about US$15 million using an exchange rate of US$1.60). By 1997, the budget had grown to US$137 million and the staff to 3,100.
Stasi victims and citizens who had been under surveillance were allowed to examine their Stasi files. Within four years of reunification, about 860,000 persons had asked to inspect their case files, with 17,626 of those requests being received in December 1994 alone. By 1997, 3.4 million people had asked to see their files. Countless civil suits were launched when victims found the names of those who had denounced and betrayed them, and many family relationships and friendships were destroyed.
The rehabilitation of Stasi victims and financial restitution to them was well under way; but Gauck believed that criminal prosecution of the perpetrators would continue to be extremely difficult. “We can already see that leading SED functionaries who bear responsibility for the inhumane policies, for which they should be tried, are instead accused of lesser offenses such as corruption. It is actually an insult to democracy that a man like Harry Tisch is tried for embezzlement and not for being a member of the Politburo, where the criminal policies originated.”
The “Stasi files law,” as it is popularly known, also made it possible to vet parliamentarians for Stasi connections. Hundreds were fired or resigned—and a few committed suicide—when it was discovered that they had been Stasi informants. Among those who resigned was Lothar de Maiziere, the last premier of the DDR, who signed the unification agreement with West German Chancellor Helmut Kohl. He was a member of the East German version of the Christian Democratic Union, which like all noncommunist parties in the Eastern bloc had been totally co-opted by the regime. After reunification, he moved into parliament and was awarded the vice chairmanship of Kohl’s Christian Democratic Union. A lawyer, De Maiziere had functioned for years as an IM, an informer, under the cover name Cerny. De Maiziere at first denied he was Cerny, but the evidence was overwhelming. It was De Maiziere’s government that had ordered the destruction of the Stasi computer tapes.
THE COMMUNISTS’ POLITICAL SURVIVAL
De Maiziere, who had been a driving force behind prompt reunification, soon passed into oblivion; but twenty members of the old Communist Party, the SED, are still members of parliament. The SED changed its name in late 1989, when the DDR was collapsing, to the Party of Democratic Socialism (PDS). Its new leadership arrogantly dismissed their bloody past as irrelevant now that the word democratic had been adopted as part of their party’s name. If the elections of summer 1990 had taken place just a few months later and thus had been conducted under the law of reunified Germany, these individuals would not have won parliamentary seats. The West German electoral rules governing the proportional representation system require that a party garner at least 5 percent of the vote before it may enter parliament. In addition to choosing a party, voters cast a second ballot for a specific person. This is called a direct mandate. If any party falls below 5 percent but gets at least three direct mandates, that party is seated in parliament. As a one-time compromise in consideration of East Germany’s smaller population, the Bonn government accepted a 3-percent margin of party votes. Even so, the PDS barely made it into parliament.
In the 1994 general election, the first after reunification, the party polled 4.4 percent. Had it not been for the votes electing four persons by direct mandate, the PDS would have been excluded. The direct mandates all came from East Berlin districts heavily populated by unemployed, former Communist Party and government officials. One of the men elected directly was Gregor Gysi, a communist lawyer who had been accused of informing on his clients to the Stasi. Gysi denied the allegations and had obtained a temporary injunction barring a former East German dissident from making the assertion. However, a Hamburg court lifted the injunction in December 1994 on the basis of Stasi documents that indicated Gysi had no case.
Another candidate directly elected to parliament was Stefan Heym, a German-born writer who had emigrated to the United States after Hitler came to power, had changed his name from Helmut Flieg, and had become a U.S. citizen. He served in the U.S. Army as an officer during World War II, but switched sides in 1952 to live in East Germany, forfeiting his U.S. citizenship in order to become an East German citizen and a member of the Communist Party. A year later, on June 17, 1953, the East German people rose up in a revolt that was crushed by the Red Army. Had it not been for the intervention of the Soviets, Heym wrote afterward in the communist daily newspaper Berliner Zeitung, “the American bombing would have already begun. The shots against the rebels were fired to prevent war, rather than to begin one.” And when Stalin died, just four months earlier, Heym used the same newspaper to mourn the butcher of an estimated twenty million people as the “most loved man of our times.” Finally, in a speech on January 31, 1995, at a demonstration marking the 62nd anniversary of the Nazi takeover, the unrepentant Heym, now eighty-two years old, had the gall to say that the present climate in Germany was “very similar to that in 1933, and this frightens me.” It was a grotesque spectacle when Heym was accorded the “honor” of delivering the opening address of the 1965 parliamentary session traditionally reserved for the body’s oldest member. Despite vehement protests, parliamentary president Rita Süssmuth ruled to uphold the tradition.
One of the PDS members also retaining his seat was Hans Modrow. Modrow, a veteran communist, was SED district secretary in Dresden. It was a most powerful communal political position. Modrow was a vital cog in the apparatus of state repression. The local Stasi chief, Major General Horst Böhm, reported directly to him. Modrow was the one who ordered the Vopo, the People’s Police, to resort to violence in putting down massive protests during the turbulent days in fall 1989, just before the Berlin Wall fell. Hundreds of protesters were severely beaten and jailed. Böhm, the Dresden Stasi boss, was found shot dead in his office in early 1990, just before he was to appear before a commission that had been convened to settle the future of the communist state. His death was listed as a suicide. However, an unsubstantiated rumor has it that he was murdered to prevent him from testifying about Modrow’s despotic rule. Modrow was found guilty of election fraud in May 1993. The DDR hierarchy, according to the evidence, had ordered that the number of votes opposing the official slate in the 1989 election had to be fewer than in 1985. Modrow reported that only 2.5 percent of the ballots in his district were cast in opposition; but the true number was at least four times higher. The judge issued him a mere rebuke, refusing to imprison or fine him. The federal high court, which reviews sentences, ordered in November 1994 that Modrow stand trial again because the sentence “was too mild.” After a new trial in 1996 on charges of perjury, Modrow was sentenced to six months’ probation. A year later, parliament was still considering whether he should be deprived of his seat.
Unlike the Nazi Party’s finances and property, which were confiscated by the victorious Allies and turned over to the first West German government in 1949, the SED’s millions were inherited by the PDS, which spirited part of those funds out of the country when the East German government collapsed. The PDS also became custodian of the archives of the SED and refused anyone outside the party access to them. Shortly after reunification, in 1990, the courts ruled that the archives were state property. Judicial authorities as well as scholars were permitted to research them. Nevertheless, the SED archives were almost lost. In 1994, the German news magazine Focus discovered a letter dated March 1991, sent by Gregor Gysi in the capacity of PDS party chief to Vladimir A. Ivashko, assistant secretary-general of the Soviet Union’s Communist Party. In this letter, Gysi pleaded with Soviet leaders either to put pressure on German Chancellor Helmut Kohl to return the archive to the PDS, or if Kohl felt this was politically impossible, to destroy it. The opening of the archive, Gysi wrote, was a “genuine catastrophe,” because it contained many secret documents. Publication of the documents would have “extremely unpleasant results not only for the PDS but for the Communist Party of the Soviet Union as well,” Gysi wrote. But his Soviet friends were no longer able to help him. The archive holds documents on Politburo decisions and directives that might prove crucial in prosecuting the former East German party hierarchy. In the end, the PDS offered to settle for 20 percent of the SED’s ill-gotten funds, forfeiting the rest as a gesture of goodwill toward the new state.
Not all observers were impressed by this compromise. Peter Gauweiler, Bavaria’s minister for development and ecological affairs at the time of reunification, and a member of the Chris-tian Democratic Party, demanded that the PDS and the Deutsche Kommunistische Partei (DKP, the West German Communist Party), be outlawed: “Every month we learn of new crimes committed by the SED—terrible things, gruesome things,” Gauweiler said. “We cannot tolerate a successor organization to such an extremely criminal gang.”
Become a Patron!
True Information is the most valuable resource and we ask you to give back.
Klaus-Dieter Maurischat – Ein Alien auf der Flucht wg. Mordes, Erpressung, Betrug, Cyberstalking, Geldwäsche, Kursmanipulation, Verleumdung, Kinderpornographie, hab ich was vergessen ?
Become a Patron!
True Information is the most valuable resource and we ask you to give back.
Ukraine’s former president Viktor Yushchenko says he hopes Europe will wake up to the threat posed by Russia in the wake of the poisonings in Salisbury. Seventeen years ago Mr Yushchenko was taking on a presidential candidate favoured by Russia when he was poisoned with a dioxin, a toxic chemical.
Become a Patron!
True Information is the most valuable resource and we ask you to give back.
Evidence shows that such a perfect murder plotted by former Stasi agents is the cause of the death of German watchdog and journalist Heinz Gerlach.
The Ministry for State Security (German: Ministerium für Staatssicherheit (MfS), commonly known as the Stasi (IPA: [ˈʃtaziː]) (abbreviation German: Staatssicherheit, literally State Security), was the official state security service of East Germany. The MfS was headquartered in East Berlin, with an extensive complex in Berlin-Lichtenberg and several smaller facilities throughout the city. It was widely regarded as one of the most effective and repressive intelligence and secret police agencies in the world. The MfS motto was “Schild und Schwert der Partei” (Shield and Sword of the Party), that is the ruling Socialist Unity Party of Germany (SED).
According to the confessions of an informer, Berlin lawyer Jochen Resch writes most of the “articles” of the communist “STASI” agency “GoMoPa” himself or it is done by lawyers of his firm. The whistleblower states that lawyer Resch is the mastermind behind the “CYBER-STASI” called “NACHRICHTENDIENST” “GoMoPa”. Bizarre enough they use Jewish names of non-existing Jewish lawyers by the name of “Goldman, Morgenstern and Partner” to stage their bogus “firm”. Further involved in their complots are a “detective” Medard Fuchsgruber and “STASI”-Colonel Ehrenfried Stelzer, “the first crime expert” in the former communist East-Germany.
According to London based Meridian Capital hundreds and thousands of wealthy people and companies have paid to the “NACHRICHTENDIENST” to avoid their cyberstalking (see article below).
Finally the German criminal police started their investigations (case number ST/0148943/2011).
The “NACHRICHTENDIENST” is also involved in the death of the well-known German watchdog and journalist Heinz Gerlach who died under strange circumstances in July 2010.
Only hours after his death the “NACHRICHTENDIENST” was spreading the news that Mr Gerlach died of blood pollution and set the stage for a fairy tale. Months before his death the “NACHRICHTENDIENST” started a campaign to ruin his reputation and presumably was also responsable for cyberattacks to bring his website down. In fact they presumably used the same tactics also against our servers. Therefore we investigated all internet details of them and handed the facts to the FBI and international authorities.
Story background:
Now it seems the STASI is back again in business after transforming it in to the CYBER-STASI of the 21st Century.
The serial betrayer and cyberstalker Klaus Maurischat is on the run again. The latest action against him (see below) cause him to react in a series of fake statements and “press releases” – one more absurd than the other. Insider analyze that his criminal organisation “GoMoPa” is about to fade away.
On our request the German criminal police (Kriminalpolizei) has opened new cases against the notorious “GoMoPa” organisation which already fled in the underground. Insiders say they have killed German journalist and watchdog Heinz Gerlach and their criminal record is bigger than the Encyclopedia – Britannica
The case is also directed against Google, Germany, whilst supporting criminal action of “GoMoPa” for years and therefore give them the chance to blackmail successfull businessman. This case is therefore an example and will be followed by many others as far as we can project. Furthermore we will bring the case to the attention of the German lawyers community which will not tolerate such misconduct by Googles German legal representative Dr. Arndt Haller and we will bring the case to the attention of Google Inc in Mountain View, USA, and the American ministry of Justice to stop the Cyberstalkers once and for all.
Besides that many legal institutions, individuals and firms have already contacted us to help to clarify the death of Mr. Heinz Gerlach and to prosecute his murderers and their backers.
The case number is ST/0148943/2011
In a series of interviews beginning 11 months before the sudden death of German watchdog Heinz Gerlach Berlin lawyer Joschen Resch unveilved secrets of Gerlach, insiders say. Secret documents from Mr Gerlachs computer were published on two dubious hostile German websites. Both have a lot of similarities in their internet registration. One the notorious “GoMoPa” website belongs to a n Eastern German organization which calls itself “
Numerous attempts have been made to stop our research and the publication of the stories by “GoMoPa” members in camouflage thus confirming the truth and the substance of it in a superior way.
Only two articles let the German audience believe that the famous journalist and watchdog Heinz Gerlach died on natural courses by blood pollution. The first one, published only hours after the death of Mr Heinz Gerlach by the notorious “GoMoPa” (see article below) and a second 3 days later by a small German local newspaper, Weserbergland Nachrichten.
Many people including the hostile Gerlach website “Akte Heinz Gerlach” doubted that this man who had so many enemies and friends would die of natural causes without any previous warning. Rumours occured that Mr. Gerlach’s doctor doubted natural courses at all. After many critical voices discussed the issue a small website of a small German local newspaper – which never before had reported about Mr. Heinz Gerlach and which is not even in the region of Mr Gerlachs home – published that Mr Gerlach died of blood pollution. Weserbergland-Nachrichten published a long article about the deadly consequences of blood pollution and did not even name the source of such an important statement. It claimed only that somebody of Gerlachs inner circle had said this. It is a proven fact that after the collpase of the Eastern German Communist Regime many former Communist propaganda agents went to regional newspapers – often in Western Germany like Günther Schabowski did the man who opened the “Mauer”.
The theatre stage was set: One day later the hostile Gerlach website “Akte Heinz Gerlach” took the agenda publishing that Mr Gerlach had died for natural causes without any further research at all.
This was done by a website which for months and months and months reported everything about Mr. Gerlach.
Furthermore a research proves that the technical details regarding the website hosting of this hostile website “Akte Heinz Gerlach” proves that there are common details with the hosting of “GoMoPa” and their affiliates as proven by the SJB-GoMoPa-victims (see http://www.sjb-fonds-opfer.com)
Insiders believe that the murderers of Mr. Heinz Gerlach are former members of the Eastern German Terror Organisation “Stasi” with dioxins. They also believe that “GoMoPa” was part of the plot. At “GoMoPa”’ a person named Siegfried Siewers was officialy responsible for the press but never appeared in public. “GoMoPa”-victims say that this name was a cameo for “GoMoPa” frontrunner Klaus Maurischat who is controlled by the Stasi Top Agent Ehrenfried Stelzner, Berlin.
Siegfried Sievers, a former Stasi member is responsible for the pollution of millions Germanys for many years with dioxins. This was unveiled at 5th of January 2011 by German prosecutors.
The victims say that Maurischat (probably also a Stasi cameo) and Sievers were in contact as Sievers acted as Stasi Agent and was in fact already a specialist in dioxins under the Communist Terror Regime in Eastern Germany.
Furthermore the Stasi Top Agent Ehrenfried Stelzer disguised as Professor for Criminal studies during the Communist Regime at the Eastern Berlin Humboldt University.
Background:
The man behind the Berlin lawyer Jochen Resch and his activities is Ehrenfried Stelzer, former Stasi Top officer in Berlin and “Professor for Criminal Studies” at the Eastern Berlin Humboldt University during the Communist regime, the SJB-GoMoPa-victims say (www.sjb-fonds-opfer.com) is responsable for the killing of German watchdog and journalist Heinz Gerlach.
These informations stem from various sources who were close to the criminal organization of GoMoPa in the last years. The SJB-GoMoPa say that the well-known German watchdog and journalist Heinz Gerlach was killed by former Stasi members with dioxins. Polychlorinated dibenzodioxins (PCDDs), or simply dioxins, are a group of organic polyhalogenated compounds that are significant because they act as environmental pollutants. They are commonly referred to as dioxins for simplicity in scientific publications because every PCDD molecule contains a dioxin skeletal structure. Typically, the p-dioxin skeleton is at the core of a PCDD molecule, giving the molecule a dibenzo-p-dioxin ring system. Members of the PCDD family have been shown to bioaccumulate in humans and wildlife due to their lipophilic properties, and are known teratogens, mutagens, and confirmed (avered) human carcinogens. They are organic compounds.
Dioxins build up primarily in fatty tissues over time (bioaccumulate), so even small exposures may eventually reach dangerous levels. In 1994, the US EPA reported that dioxins are a probable carcinogen, but noted that non-cancer effects (reproduction and sexual development, immune system) may pose an even greater threat to human health. TCDD, the most toxic of the dibenzodioxins, is classified as a Group 1 carcinogen by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC).
In 2004, a notable individual case of dioxin poisoning, Ukrainian politician Viktor Yushchenko was exposed to the second-largest measured dose of dioxins, according to the reports of the physicians responsible for diagnosing him. This is the first known case of a single high dose of TCDD dioxin poisoning, and was diagnosed only after a toxicologist recognized the symptoms of chloracne while viewing television news coverage of his condition.
German dioxin scandal: In January 2011 about 4700 German farms were banned from making deliveries after tests at the Harles und Jentzsch plant in the state of Schleswig-Holstein showed high levels of dioxin. Again this incident appears to involve PCBs and not PCDDs at all. Dioxin were found in animal feed and eggs in many farms. The person who is responsible for this, Siegfried Sievert is also a former Stasi Agent. At “GoMoPa” the notorious Eastern-Berlin press agency (see article below) one of the henchmen acted under the name of “Siegfried Siewert”.
Further evidence for the killing of Mr.Heinz Gerlach is provided by the SJB-GoMoPa-victims by analyzing the dubious role of former Stasi-Top-agent Ehrenfried Stelzer, also a former “Professor for Crime Studies” under the Communist regime in Eastern Germany and the dubious role of “detective” Medard Fuchsgruber. Both are closely tied to the dubious “GoMoPa” and Berlin lawyer Jochen Resch.
According to the SJB-GoMoPa-victims is Berlin lawyer Jochen Resch the mastermind of the criminal organization “GoMoPa2. The victims state that they have a source inside “GoMoPa” who helped them discover the shocking truth. The so-called “Deep Throat from Berlin” has information that Resch had the idea to found the criminal organization “GoMoPa” and use non-existing Jewish lawyers named Goldman, Morgenstern & Partner as camouflage. Their “office” in Madison Avenue, New York, is a mailbox. This is witnessed by a German Ex-Patriot, a lawyer, whose father, Heinz Gerlach, died under strange circumstances.
Resch seems to use “GoMoPa” as an instrument to blackmail parts of the German Property and Investment section.
-“Worse than the Gestapo.” —Simon Wiesenthal, Nazi hunter said about the notorious “Stasi”.
Less than a month after German demonstrators began to tear down the Berlin Wall on November 9, 1989, irate East German citizens stormed the Leipzig district office of the Ministry for State Security (MfS)—the Stasi, as it was more commonly called. Not a shot was fired, and there was no evidence of “street justice” as Stasi officers surrendered meekly and were peacefully led away. The following month, on January 15, hundreds of citizens sacked Stasi headquarters in Berlin. Again there was no bloodshed. The last bit of unfinished business was accomplished on May 31 when the Stasi radioed its agents in West Germany to fold their tents and come home.
The intelligence department of the Nationale Volksarmee (NVA), the People’s Army, had done the same almost a week earlier, but with what its members thought was better style. In-stead of sending the five-digit code groups that it had used for decades to message its spies in West Germany, the army group broadcast a male choir singing a children’s ditty about a duck swimming on a lake. There was no doubt that the singing spymasters had been drowning their sorrow over losing the Cold War in schnapps. The giggling, word-slurring songsters repeated the refrain three times: “Dunk your little head in the water and lift your little tail.” This was the signal to agents under deep cover that it was time to come home.
With extraordinary speed and political resolve, the divided nation was reunified a year later. The collapse of the despotic regime was total. It was a euphoric time for Germans, but reunification also produced a new national dilemma. Nazi war crimes were still being tried in West Germany, forty-six years after World War II. Suddenly the German government was faced with demands that the communist officials who had ordered, executed, and abetted crimes against their own people—crimes that were as brutal as those perpetrated by their Nazi predecessors—also be prosecuted.
The people of the former Deutsche Demokratische Republik (DDR), the German Democratic Republic, as the state had called itself for forty years, were clamoring for instant revenge. Their wrath was directed primarily against the country’s communist rulers—the upper echelon of the Sozialistische Einheitspartei (SED), the Socialist Unity Party. The tens of thousands of second-echelon party functionaries who had enriched themselves at the expense of their cocitizens were also prime targets for retribution.
Particularly singled out were the former members of the Stasi, the East German secret police, who previously had considered themselves the “shield and sword” of the party. When the regime collapsed, the Stasi had 102,000 full-time officers and noncommissioned personnel on its rolls, including 11,000 members of the ministry’s own special guards regiment. Between 1950 and 1989, a total of 274,000 persons served in the Stasi.
The people’s ire was running equally strong against the regular Stasi informers, the inoffizielle Mitarbeiter (IMs). By 1995, 174,000 had been identified as IMs, or 2.5 percent of the total population between the ages of 18 and 60. Researchers were aghast when they found that about 10,000 IMs, or roughly 6 percent of the total, had not yet reached the age of 18. Since many records were destroyed, the exact number of IMs probably will never be determined; but 500,000 was cited as a realistic figure. Former Colonel Rainer Wiegand, who served in the Stasi counterintelligence directorate, estimated that the figure could go as high as 2 million, if occasional stool pigeons were included.
“The Stasi was much, much worse than the Gestapo, if you consider only the oppression of its own people,” according to Simon Wiesenthal of Vienna, Austria, who has been hunting Nazi criminals for half a century. “The Gestapo had 40,000 officials watching a country of 80 million, while the Stasi employed 102,000 to control only 17 million.” One might add that the Nazi terror lasted only twelve years, whereas the Stasi had four decades in which to perfect its machinery of oppression, espionage, and international terrorism and subversion.
To ensure that the people would become and remain submissive, East German communist leaders saturated their realm with more spies than had any other totalitarian government in recent history. The Soviet Union’s KGB employed about 480,000 full-time agents to oversee a nation of 280 million, which means there was one agent per 5,830 citizens. Using Wiesenthal’s figures for the Nazi Gestapo, there was one officer for 2,000 people. The ratio for the Stasi was one secret policeman per 166 East Germans. When the regular informers are added, these ratios become much higher: In the Stasi’s case, there would have been at least one spy watching every 66 citizens! When one adds in the estimated numbers of part-time snoops, the result is nothing short of monstrous: one informer per 6.5 citizens. It would not have been unreasonable to assume that at least one Stasi informer was present in any party of ten or twelve dinner guests.
THE STASI OCTOPUS
Like a giant octopus, the Stasi’s tentacles probed every aspect of life. Full-time officers were posted to all major industrial plants. Without exception, one tenant in every apartment build-ing was designated as a watchdog reporting to an area representative of the Volkspolizei (Vopo), the People’s Police. In turn, the police officer was the Stasi’s man. If a relative or friend came to stay overnight, it was reported. Schools, universities, and hospitals were infiltrated from top to bottom. German academe was shocked to learn that Heinrich Fink, professor of theology and vice chancellor at East Berlin’s Humboldt University, had been a Stasi informer since 1968. After Fink’s Stasi connections came to light, he was summarily fired. Doctors, lawyers, journalists, writers, actors, and sports figures were co-opted by Stasi officers, as were waiters and hotel personnel. Tapping about 100,000 telephone lines in West Germany and West Berlin around the clock was the job of 2,000 officers.
Stasi officers knew no limits and had no shame when it came to “protecting the party and the state.” Churchmen, including high officials of both Protestant and Catholic denomina-tions, were recruited en masse as secret informers. Their offices and confessionals were infested with eavesdropping devices. Even the director of Leipzig’s famous Thomas Church choir, Hans-Joachim Rotch, was forced to resign when he was unmasked as a Spitzel, the people’s pejorative for a Stasi informant.
Absolutely nothing was sacred to the secret police. Tiny holes were bored in apartment and hotel room walls through which Stasi agents filmed their “suspects” with special video cam-eras. Even bathrooms were penetrated by the communist voyeurs.8 Like the Nazi Gestapo, the Stasi was the sinister side of deutsche Gründlichkeit (German thoroughness).
After the Berlin wall came down, the victims of the DDR regime demanded immediate retribution. Ironically, their demands were countered by their fellow Germans in the West who, living in freedom, had diligently built einen demokratischen Rechtsstaat, a democratic state governed by the rule of law. The challenge of protecting the rights of both the victims and the accused was immense, given the emotions surrounding the issue. Government leaders and democratic politicians recognized that there could be no “quick fix” of communist injustices without jeopardizing the entire system of democratic jurisprudence. Moving too rapidly merely to satisfy the popular thirst for revenge might well have resulted in acquittals or mistrials. Intricate jurisdictional questions needed to be resolved with both alacrity and meticulousness. No German government could afford to allow a perpetrator to go free because of a judicial error. The political fallout from any such occurrence, especially in the East, could prove fatal to whatever political party occupied the chancellor’s office in Bonn at the time.
Politicians and legal scholars of the “old federal states,” or West Germany, counseled patience, pointing out that even the prosecution of Nazi criminals had not yet been completed. Before unification, Germans would speak of Vergangenheitsbewältigung (“coming to grips with the past”) when they discussed dealing with Nazi crimes. In the reunited Germany, this word came to imply the communist past as well. The two were considered comparable especially in the area of human rights violations. Dealing with major Nazi crimes, however, was far less complicated for the Germans: Adolf Hitler and his Gestapo and Schutzstaffel (SS) chief, Heinrich Himmler, killed themselves, as did Luftwaffe chief and Vice Chancellor Hermann Göring, who also had been the first chief of the Gestapo. The victorious Allies prosecuted the rest of the top leadership at the International War Crimes Tribunal in Nürnberg. Twelve were hanged, three received life terms, four were sentenced to lesser terms of imprisonment (up to twenty years), and three were acquitted.
The cases of communist judges and prosecutors accused of Rechtsbeugung (perversion of justice) are more problematic. According to Franco Werkenthin, a Berlin legal expert charged with analyzing communist crimes for the German parliament, those sitting in judgment of many of the accused face a difficult task because of the general failure of German justice after World War II. Not a single judge or prosecutor who served the Nazi regime was brought to account for having perverted justice—even those who had handed down death sentences for infringements that in a democracy would have been considered relatively minor offenses. Werkenthin called this phenomenon die Jauche der Justiz, the cesspool of justice.
Of course, the crimes committed by the communists were not nearly as heinous as the Nazis’ extermination of the Jews, or the mass murders in Nazi-occupied territories. However, the communists’ brutal oppression of the nation by means including murder alongside legal execution put the SED leadership on a par with Hitler’s gang. In that sense, Walter Ulbricht or Erich Honecker (Ulbricht’s successor as the party’s secretary-general and head of state) and secret police chief Erich Mielke can justifiably be compared to Hitler and Himmler, respectively.
Arrest warrants were issued for Honecker and Mielke. The Soviet government engineered Honecker’s escape to Moscow, where he became the ward of Soviet President Mikhail S. Gor-bachev. When the Soviet Union crumbled, the new Russian President Boris Yeltsin expelled Honecker. He was arrested on his return to Germany, but a court decided against a trial when he was diagnosed with liver cancer. Honecker flew to Chile with his wife Margot to live with their daughter, a Chilean citizen by marriage. His exile was short, and he died in 1994. Mielke was not so fortunate: His KGB friends turned their backs on him. He was tried in Germany for the 1931 murder of two police officers, found guilty, and sentenced to six years in prison. Other charges, including manslaughter, were dismissed because of his advanced age and poor health.
Three other members of the twenty-one-member ruling Politburo also have been tried. Former Defense Minister Heinz Kessler was convicted of manslaughter in connection with the order to kill people who were trying to escape to the West. He received a seven-and-a-half-year term. Two others, members of the Central Committee and the National Defense Council, were tried with Kessler and sentenced to seven and a half years and five years, respectively. Politburo member Harry Tisch, who was also head of the communist trade union, was found guilty of embezzlement and served eighteen months. Six others, including Egon Krenz (Honecker’s successor as party chief), were charged with manslaughter. Krenz was found guilty, and on August 25, 1997, was sentenced to six and a half years in prison.
However, eight years after reunification, many of the 165 members of the Central Committee have not yet been put under investigation. In 1945, Nazis holding comparable or lesser positions were subject to automatic arrest by the Allies. They spent months or even years in camps while their cases were adjudicated. Moreover, the Nürnberg Tribunal branded the Reich and its Corps of Political Leaders, SS, Security Service (SD), Secret State Police (Gestapo), SA (Storm Troopers), and Armed Forces High Command criminal organizations. Similarly sweeping actions against communist leaders and functionaries such as Stasi officers were never contemplated, even though tens of thousands of political trials and human rights abuses have been documented. After the East German regime fell, German judicial authorities scrupulously avoided the appearance of waging witch-hunts or using the law as a weapon of vengeance. Prosecutors and judges made great efforts to be fair, often suspending legal action while requesting rulings from the supreme court on possible constitutional conflicts.
The victims of oppression clamored for revenge and demanded speedy prosecution of the erstwhile tyrants. They had little patience for a judicial system that was handicapped by a lack of unblemished and experienced criminal investigators, prosecutors, and judges. Despite these handicaps, the Berlin Central Police Investigations Group for Government Criminality, mindful that the statute of limitations for most communist crimes would expire at the end of 1999, made significant progress under its director Manfred Kittlaus, the able former director of the West Berlin state police. Kittlaus’s major task in 1998 was to investigate wrongful deaths, including 73 murders, 30 attempted murders, 583 cases of manslaughter, 2,938 instances of attempted manslaughter, and 425 other suspicious deaths. Of the 73 murders, 22 were classified as contract murders.
One of those tried and convicted for attempted contract murder was former Stasi collaborator Peter Haak, who was sentenced to six and a half years in prison. The fifty-two-year-old Haak took part in the Stasi’s 1981 Operation Scorpion, which was designed to pursue people who helped East Germans escape to the West. Proceedings against former General Gerhard Neiber, whose Stasi directorate was responsible for preventing escapes and for wreaking vengeance, were still pending in 1998.
Peter Haak’s murder plot was hatched after he befriended Wolfgang Welsch and his family. Welsch was a thorn in the side of the Stasi because of his success in smuggling people out of the DDR. Haak joined Welsch and the latter’s wife and seven-year-old daughter on a vacation in Israel, where he mixed a gram of thallium, a highly poisonous metallic chemical element used in rat poison, into the hamburgers he was preparing for a meal. Welsch’s wife and daughter vomited immediately after ingesting the poison and recovered quickly. Welsch suffered severe aftereffects, but eventually recovered: He had consumed a large amount of beer with the meal, and an expert testified that the alcohol had probably flushed the poison from his system.
Berlin Prosecutor General Christoph Schäfgen revealed that after the DDR’s demise 15,200 investigations had been launched, of which more than 9,000 were still active at the beginning of 1995. Indictments were handed down in 153 cases, and 73 perpetrators were convicted. Among those convicted were the aforementioned Politburo members as well as a number of border guards who had killed people who were trying to escape to the West.
Despite widespread misgivings about the judicial failures in connection with some Nazi crimes, a number of judges and prosecutors were convicted and jailed for up to three years for perversion of justice. In collusion with the Stasi, they had requested or handed down more severe sentences in political cases so that the state could collect greater amounts when the “convicts” were ransomed by the West German government. {The amount of ransom paid was governed by the time a prisoner had been sentenced to serve.)
The enormity of the task facing judicial authorities in reunified Germany becomes starkly evident when one examines the actions they have taken in all five former East German prov-inces and in East Berlin. From the end of 1990 to July 1996, 52,050 probes were launched into charges of murder, attempted murder, manslaughter, kidnapping, election fraud, and per-version of justice. A total of 29,557 investigations were halted for various reasons including death, severe illness, old age, or insufficient evidence. In those five and a half years, there were only 139 convictions.
The problem is even more staggering when cases of espionage are included. Between 1990 and 1996, the office of the federal prosecutor general launched 6,641 probes, of which 2,431 were terminated before trial—most due to the statute of limitations. Of 175 indictments on charges of espionage, 95 resulted in convictions. In addition to the cases handled at the federal level, the prosecutor general referred 3,926 investigations to state authorities, who terminated 3,344 without trial. State courts conducted 356 trials, resulting in 248 convictions. Because the statute of limitations for espionage is five years, the prosecutor general’s office told me in 1997 it was unlikely that more espionage trials would be conducted.
It is important to emphasize the difference between the statute’s application to so-called government crimes committed in East Germany before the collapse and to crimes, such as es-pionage, committed in West Germany. The Unification Treaty specifically permits the belated prosecution of individuals who committed acts that were punishable under the East German criminal code and who due to official connivance were not prosecuted earlier. There is no statute of limitations for murder. For most other crimes the limit is five years; however, due to the obstacles created by previous government connivance, the German parliament in 1993 doubled this time limit for prosecution of the more serious crimes. At the same time, the par-liament decreed that all cases must be adjudicated by the end of 2002. For less serious offenses, the statute would have run out on December 31, 1997, but the parliament extended it to 2000.
A number of politicians, jurists, and liberal journalists pleaded for a general amnesty for crimes committed by former DDR leaders and Communist Party functionaries. A former West German supreme court judge, Ernst Mahrenholz, said the “sharp sword of justice prevents reconciliation.” Schäfgen, the Berlin prosecutor general, had this answer for the former high court judge and other amnesty advocates:
I cannot agree. We are raising no special, sharp sword against East Germans. We must pursue state-sponsored injustice in exactly the same manner as we do when a thief steals or when one human being kills another. If one wants to change that, then we would have to do away with the entire criminal justice system, because punishment always hurts. We are not criminalizing an entire people but only an ever shrinking, small portion.
German Foreign Minister Klaus Kinkel, who was West Germany’s minister of justice when the nation was unified, said this at a session of parliament in September 1991: “We must punish the perpetrators. This is not a matter of a victor’s justice. We owe it to the ideal of justice and to the victims. All of those who ordered injustices and those who executed the orders must be punished; the top men of the SED as well as the ones who shot [people] at the wall.” Aware that the feelings against communists were running high among their victims, Kinkel pointed to past revolutions after which the representatives of the old system were collectively liquidated. In the same speech before parliament, he said:
Such methods are alien to a state ruled by law. Violence and vengeance are incompatible with the law in any case. At the same time, we cannot tolerate that the problems are swept under the rug as a way of dealing with a horrible past, because the results will later be disastrous for society. We Germans know from our own experience where this leads. Jewish philosophy formulates it in this way: “The secret of redemption is called remembering.”
Defense attorneys for communist officials have maintained that the difficulty lies in the fact that hundreds of thousands of political opponents were tried under laws of the DDR. Although these laws were designed to smother political dissent and grossly violated basic human rights and democratic norms, they were nonetheless laws promulgated by a sovereign state. How could one justly try individual Stasi officers, prosecutors, and judges who had simply been fulfilling their legal responsibility to pursue and punish violators of the law?
Opinions varied widely on whether and how the Stasi and other perpetrators of state-sponsored crimes should be tried. Did the laws of the DDR, as they existed before reunification, still apply in the east? Or was the criminal code of the western part of the country the proper instrument of justice in reunified Germany? However, these questions were moot: As Rupert Scholz, professor of law at the University of Munich and a Christian Democratic member of parliament, pointed out, the Unification Treaty specifies that the penal code of the DDR and not that of the Federal Republic of Germany (FRG) shall be applied to offenses committed in East Germany. Scholz’s view was upheld by the Bundesverfassungsgericht, the supreme court. Most offenses committed by party functionaries and Stasi officers—murder, kidnapping, torture, illegal wiretapping, mail robbery, and fraud—were subject to prosecution in reunified Germany under the DDR’s penal code. But this would not satisfy the tens of thousands of citizens who had been sent to prison under East German laws covering purely political offenses for which there was no West German equivalent.
Nevertheless, said Scholz, judicial authorities were by no means hamstrung, because West Germany had never recognized the East German state according to international law. “We have always said that we are one nation; that the division of Germany led neither to full recognition under international law nor, concomitantly, to a recognition of the legal system of the DDR,” Scholz said. Accordingly, West German courts have consistently maintained that West German law protects all Germans equally, including those living in the East. Therefore, no matter where the crimes were committed, whether in the East or the West, all Germans have always been subject to West German laws. Applying this logic, East German border guards who had either killed or wounded persons trying to escape to the West could be tried under the jurisdiction of West Germany.
The “one nation” principle was not upheld by the German supreme court. Prior to the court’s decision, however, Colonel General Markus Wolf, chief of the Stasi’s foreign espionage directorate, and some of his officers who personally controlled agents from East Berlin had been tried for treason and convicted. Wolf had been sentenced to six years in prison. The su-preme court ruling overturned that verdict and those imposed on Wolf’s cohorts, even though they had obtained the most closely held West German secrets and handed them over to the KGB. The maximum penalty for Landesverrat, or treason, is life imprisonment. In vacating Wolf’s sentence, the court said he could not be convicted because he operated only from East German territory and under East German law.
However, Wolf was reindicted on charges of kidnapping and causing bodily harm, crimes also punishable under East German law. The former Stasi three-star general, on March 24, 1955, had approved in writing a plan to kidnap a woman who worked for the U.S. mission in West Berlin. The woman and her mother were tricked by a Stasi agent whom the woman had been teaching English, and voluntarily got into his car. He drove them into the Soviet sector of the divided city, where they were seized by Stasi officers. The woman was subjected to psychological torture and threatened with imprisonment unless she signed an agreement to spy for the Stasi. She agreed. On her return to the American sector, however, the woman reported the incident to security officials. Wolf had committed a felony punishable by up to fifteen years’ imprisonment in West Germany. He was found guilty in March 1977 and sentenced to two years’ probation.
Those who have challenged the application of the statute of limitations to communist crimes, especially to the executions of citizens fleeing to the West, have drawn parallels to the notorious executive orders of Adolf Hitler. Hitler issued orders mandating the summary execution of Soviet Army political commissars upon their capture and initiating the extermination of Jews. An early postwar judicial decision held that these orders were equivalent to law. When that law was declared illegal and retroactively repealed by the West German Bundestag, the statute of limitations was suspended—that is, it never took effect. Many of those convicted in subsequent trials of carrying out the Führer’s orders were executed by the Allies. The German supreme court has ruled the same way as the Bundestag on the order to shoot people trying to escape to West Germany, making the statute of limitations inapplicable to such cases. The ruling made possible the trial of members of the National Defense Council who took part in formulating or promulgating the order. A number of border guards who had shot would-be escapees also have been tried and convicted.
Chief Prosecutor Heiner Sauer, former head of the West German Central Registration Office for Political Crimes, was particularly concerned with the border shootings. His office, located in Salzgitter, West Germany, was established in 1961 as a direct consequence of the Berlin Wall, which was erected on August 13 of that year. Willy Brandt, at the time the city’s mayor (later federal chancellor) had decided that crimes committed by East German border guards should be recorded. At his behest, a central registry of all shootings and other serious border incidents was instituted. Between August 13, 1961 and the opening of the borders on November 9, 1989, 186 border killings were registered. But when the Stasi archives were opened, investigators found that at least 825 people had paid with their lives for trying to escape to the West. This figure was reported to the court that was trying former members of the National Defense Council. In addition to these border incidents, the registry also had recorded a number of similar political offenses committed in the interior of the DDR: By fall 1991, Sauer’s office had registered 4,444 cases of actual or attempted killings and about 40,000 sentences handed down by DDR courts for “political offenses.”
During the early years of Sauer’s operation, the details of political prosecutions became known only when victims were ransomed by West Germany or were expelled. Between 1963 and 1989, West Germany paid DM5 billion (nearly US$3 billion) to the communist regime for the release of 34,000 political prisoners. The price per head varied according to the importance of the person or the length of the sentence. In some cases the ransom amounted to more than US$56,000. The highest sum ever paid to the East Germans appears to have been DM450,000 (US$264,705 using an exchange rate of US$1.70 to the mark). The ransom “object” in this case was Count Benedikt von Hoensbroech. A student in his early twenties, von Hoensbroech was attending a West Berlin university when the wall went up. He was caught by the Stasi while trying to help people escape and was sentenced to ten years at hard labor. The case at-tracted international attention because his family was related to Queen Fabiola of Belgium, who interceded with the East Germans. Smelling money, the East German government first demanded the equivalent of more than US$1 million from the young man’s father as ransom. In the end, the parties settled on the figure of DM450,000, of which the West German gov-ernment paid DM40,000 (about $23,529). Such ransom operations were fully controlled by the Stasi.
Political prisoners released in the DDR could not be registered by the West Germans because their cases remained secret. The victims were admonished to keep quiet or face another prison term. Nonetheless, in the first year after reunification, Sauer’s office added another 20,000 documented cases, for a total of 60,000. Sauer said he believed the final figure of all political prosecutions would be somewhere around 300,000. In every case, the Stasi was involved either in the initial arrest or in pretrial interrogations during which “confessions” were usually extracted by physical or psychological torture, particularly between the mid-1940s and the mid-1960s.
Until 1987, the DDR imposed the death penalty for a number of capital crimes, including murder, espionage, and economic offenses. But after the mid-1950s, nearly all death sentences were kept quiet and executions were carried out in the strictest secrecy, initially by guillotine and in later years by a single pistol shot to the neck. In most instances, the relatives of those killed were not informed either of the sentence or of the execution. The corpses were cremated and the ashes buried secretly, sometimes at construction sites. In reporting about one executioner who shot more than twenty persons to death, the Berlin newspaper Bildzeitung said that a total of 170 civilians had been executed in East Germany. However, Franco Werkenthin, the Berlin official investigating DDR crimes, said he had documented at least three hundred executions. He declined to say how many were for political offenses, because he had not yet submitted his report to parliament. “But it was substantial,” he told me. The true number of executions may never be known because no complete record of death sentences meted out by civil courts could be found. Other death sentences were handed down by military courts, and many records of those are also missing. In addition, German historian Günther Buch believes that about two hundred members of the Stasi itself were executed for various crimes, including attempts to escape to the West.
SAFEGUARDING HUMAN DIGNITY?
The preamble to the East German criminal code stated that the purpose of the code was to “safeguard the dignity of humankind, its freedom and rights under the aegis of the criminal code of the socialist state,” and that “a person can be prosecuted under the criminal code only in strictest concurrence with the law.” However, many of the codified offenses for which East German citizens were prosecuted and imprisoned were unique to totalitarian regimes, both fascist and communist.
Moreover, certain sections of the code, such as those on “Treasonable Relaying of Information” and “Treasonable Agent Activity,” were perversely applied, landing countless East Germans in maximum security penitentiaries. The victims of this perversion of justice usually were persons who had requested legal exit permits from the DDR authorities and had been turned down. In many cases, their “crime” was having contacted a Western consulate to inquire about immigration procedures. Sentences of up to two and a half years’ hard labor were not unusual as punishment for such inquiries.
Engaging in “propaganda hostile to the state” was another punishable offense. In one such case, a young man was arrested and prosecuted for saying that it was not necessary to station tanks at the border and for referring to border fortifications as “nonsense.” During his trial, he “admitted” to owning a television set on which he watched West German programs and later told friends what he saw. One of those “friends” had denounced him to the Stasi. The judge considered the accused’s actions especially egregious and sentenced him to a year and a half at hard labor.
Ironically, another part of this section of the criminal code decreed that “glorifying militarism” also was a punishable offense, although the DDR itself “glorified” its People’s Army beyond any Western norm. That army was clad in uniforms and insignia identical to those of the Nazi Wehrmacht, albeit without eagles and swastikas. The helmets, too, were differently shaped, but the Prussian goose step was regulation during parades.
A nineteen-year-old who had placed a sign in an apartment window reading “When justice is turned into injustice, resistance becomes an obligation!” was rewarded with twenty-two months in the penitentiary. Earlier, the youth had applied for an exit visa and had been turned down. A thirty-four-year-old father of two who also had been denied permission to leave the “workers’ and peasants’ state” with his family similarly advertised that fact with a poster reading “We want to leave, but they won’t let us.” The man went to prison for sixteen months. The “crimes” of both men were covered by a law on “Interference in Activities of the State or Society.”
Two letters—one to a friend in West Germany, seeking assistance to legally emigrate to the West, and another containing a similar appeal to Chief of State Honecker—brought a four-year sentence to their writer, who was convicted under two laws: those on “establishing illegal contacts” (writing to his friend) and on “public denigration” (writing to Honecker). The Stasi had illegally intercepted both letters.
The East German party chiefs were not content to rely only on the Stasi’s millions of informers to ferret out antistate sentiments. Leaving nothing to chance, they created a law that made the failure to denounce fellow citizens a crime punishable by up to five years’ imprisonment. One man was sentenced to twenty-three months for failing to report that a friend of his was preparing to escape to the West. The mandatory denunciation law had its roots in the statutes of the Socialist Unity Party, which were published in the form of a little red booklet. I picked up a copy of this booklet that had been discarded by its previous owner, a Stasi chauffeur, who had written “Ha, Ha” next to the mandate to “report any misdeeds, regardless of the person responsible, to leading party organs, all the way up to the Central Committee.”
Rupert Scholz, member of parliament and professor of law at the University of Munich, said many East Germans feel there is little determination among their Western brethren to bring the Stasi criminals to trial. “In fact, we already have heard many of them say that the peaceful revolution should have been a bloody one instead so they could have done away with their tormentors by hanging them posthaste,” Scholz told me.
The Reverend Joachim Gauck, minister to a Lutheran parish in East Germany, shared the people’s pessimism that justice would be done. Following reunification, Gauck was appointed by the Bonn government as its special representative for safeguarding and maintaining the Stasi archives. “We must at least establish a legal basis for finding the culprits in our files,” Gauck told me. “But it will not be easy. If you stood the millions of files upright in one line, they would stretch for 202 kilometers [about 121 miles]. In those files you can find an unbe-lievable number of Stasi victims and their tormentors.”
Gauck was given the mandate he needed in November 1991, when the German parliament passed a law authorizing file searches to uncover Stasi perpetrators and their informants. He viewed this legislation as first step in the right direction. With the evidence from Stasi files, the perpetrators could be removed from their public service jobs without any formal legal pro-ceedings. Said Gauck: “We needed this law badly. It is not reasonable that persons who served this apparatus of oppression remain in positions of trust. We need to win our people over to accepting that they are now free and governed by the rule of law. To achieve that, we must build up their confidence and trust in the public service.”
Searching the roughly six million files will take years. A significant number of the dossiers are located in repositories of the Stasi regional offices, sprinkled throughout eastern Germany. To put the files at the Berlin central repository in archival order would take one person 128 years. The job might have been made easier had the last DDR government not ordered the burning of thousands of Stasi computer tapes, ostensibly to forestall a witch-hunt. Thousands of files dealing with espionage were shredded and packed into 17,200 paper sacks. These were discovered when the Stasi headquarters was stormed on January 15, 1990. The contents of all of these bags now have been inspected. It took two workers between six and eight weeks to go through one bag. Then began the work of the puzzlers, putting the shredded pieces together. By the middle of 1997, fewer than 500 bags of shredded papers had been reconstructed—into about 200,000 pages. Further complicating matters was the lack of trained archivists and experts capable of organizing these files—to say nothing of the 37.5 million index cards bearing the names of informers as well as persons under Stasi surveillance—and interpreting their contents. Initially, funding for a staff of about 550 individuals was planned, at a total of about DM24.5 million annually (about US$15 million using an exchange rate of US$1.60). By 1997, the budget had grown to US$137 million and the staff to 3,100.
Stasi victims and citizens who had been under surveillance were allowed to examine their Stasi files. Within four years of reunification, about 860,000 persons had asked to inspect their case files, with 17,626 of those requests being received in December 1994 alone. By 1997, 3.4 million people had asked to see their files. Countless civil suits were launched when victims found the names of those who had denounced and betrayed them, and many family relationships and friendships were destroyed.
The rehabilitation of Stasi victims and financial restitution to them was well under way; but Gauck believed that criminal prosecution of the perpetrators would continue to be extremely difficult. “We can already see that leading SED functionaries who bear responsibility for the inhumane policies, for which they should be tried, are instead accused of lesser offenses such as corruption. It is actually an insult to democracy that a man like Harry Tisch is tried for embezzlement and not for being a member of the Politburo, where the criminal policies originated.”
The “Stasi files law,” as it is popularly known, also made it possible to vet parliamentarians for Stasi connections. Hundreds were fired or resigned—and a few committed suicide—when it was discovered that they had been Stasi informants. Among those who resigned was Lothar de Maiziere, the last premier of the DDR, who signed the unification agreement with West German Chancellor Helmut Kohl. He was a member of the East German version of the Christian Democratic Union, which like all noncommunist parties in the Eastern bloc had been totally co-opted by the regime. After reunification, he moved into parliament and was awarded the vice chairmanship of Kohl’s Christian Democratic Union. A lawyer, De Maiziere had functioned for years as an IM, an informer, under the cover name Cerny. De Maiziere at first denied he was Cerny, but the evidence was overwhelming. It was De Maiziere’s government that had ordered the destruction of the Stasi computer tapes.
THE COMMUNISTS’ POLITICAL SURVIVAL
De Maiziere, who had been a driving force behind prompt reunification, soon passed into oblivion; but twenty members of the old Communist Party, the SED, are still members of parliament. The SED changed its name in late 1989, when the DDR was collapsing, to the Party of Democratic Socialism (PDS). Its new leadership arrogantly dismissed their bloody past as irrelevant now that the word democratic had been adopted as part of their party’s name. If the elections of summer 1990 had taken place just a few months later and thus had been conducted under the law of reunified Germany, these individuals would not have won parliamentary seats. The West German electoral rules governing the proportional representation system require that a party garner at least 5 percent of the vote before it may enter parliament. In addition to choosing a party, voters cast a second ballot for a specific person. This is called a direct mandate. If any party falls below 5 percent but gets at least three direct mandates, that party is seated in parliament. As a one-time compromise in consideration of East Germany’s smaller population, the Bonn government accepted a 3-percent margin of party votes. Even so, the PDS barely made it into parliament.
In the 1994 general election, the first after reunification, the party polled 4.4 percent. Had it not been for the votes electing four persons by direct mandate, the PDS would have been excluded. The direct mandates all came from East Berlin districts heavily populated by unemployed, former Communist Party and government officials. One of the men elected directly was Gregor Gysi, a communist lawyer who had been accused of informing on his clients to the Stasi. Gysi denied the allegations and had obtained a temporary injunction barring a former East German dissident from making the assertion. However, a Hamburg court lifted the injunction in December 1994 on the basis of Stasi documents that indicated Gysi had no case.
Another candidate directly elected to parliament was Stefan Heym, a German-born writer who had emigrated to the United States after Hitler came to power, had changed his name from Helmut Flieg, and had become a U.S. citizen. He served in the U.S. Army as an officer during World War II, but switched sides in 1952 to live in East Germany, forfeiting his U.S. citizenship in order to become an East German citizen and a member of the Communist Party. A year later, on June 17, 1953, the East German people rose up in a revolt that was crushed by the Red Army. Had it not been for the intervention of the Soviets, Heym wrote afterward in the communist daily newspaper Berliner Zeitung, “the American bombing would have already begun. The shots against the rebels were fired to prevent war, rather than to begin one.” And when Stalin died, just four months earlier, Heym used the same newspaper to mourn the butcher of an estimated twenty million people as the “most loved man of our times.” Finally, in a speech on January 31, 1995, at a demonstration marking the 62nd anniversary of the Nazi takeover, the unrepentant Heym, now eighty-two years old, had the gall to say that the present climate in Germany was “very similar to that in 1933, and this frightens me.” It was a grotesque spectacle when Heym was accorded the “honor” of delivering the opening address of the 1965 parliamentary session traditionally reserved for the body’s oldest member. Despite vehement protests, parliamentary president Rita Süssmuth ruled to uphold the tradition.
One of the PDS members also retaining his seat was Hans Modrow. Modrow, a veteran communist, was SED district secretary in Dresden. It was a most powerful communal political position. Modrow was a vital cog in the apparatus of state repression. The local Stasi chief, Major General Horst Böhm, reported directly to him. Modrow was the one who ordered the Vopo, the People’s Police, to resort to violence in putting down massive protests during the turbulent days in fall 1989, just before the Berlin Wall fell. Hundreds of protesters were severely beaten and jailed. Böhm, the Dresden Stasi boss, was found shot dead in his office in early 1990, just before he was to appear before a commission that had been convened to settle the future of the communist state. His death was listed as a suicide. However, an unsubstantiated rumor has it that he was murdered to prevent him from testifying about Modrow’s despotic rule. Modrow was found guilty of election fraud in May 1993. The DDR hierarchy, according to the evidence, had ordered that the number of votes opposing the official slate in the 1989 election had to be fewer than in 1985. Modrow reported that only 2.5 percent of the ballots in his district were cast in opposition; but the true number was at least four times higher. The judge issued him a mere rebuke, refusing to imprison or fine him. The federal high court, which reviews sentences, ordered in November 1994 that Modrow stand trial again because the sentence “was too mild.” After a new trial in 1996 on charges of perjury, Modrow was sentenced to six months’ probation. A year later, parliament was still considering whether he should be deprived of his seat.
Unlike the Nazi Party’s finances and property, which were confiscated by the victorious Allies and turned over to the first West German government in 1949, the SED’s millions were inherited by the PDS, which spirited part of those funds out of the country when the East German government collapsed. The PDS also became custodian of the archives of the SED and refused anyone outside the party access to them. Shortly after reunification, in 1990, the courts ruled that the archives were state property. Judicial authorities as well as scholars were permitted to research them. Nevertheless, the SED archives were almost lost. In 1994, the German news magazine Focus discovered a letter dated March 1991, sent by Gregor Gysi in the capacity of PDS party chief to Vladimir A. Ivashko, assistant secretary-general of the Soviet Union’s Communist Party. In this letter, Gysi pleaded with Soviet leaders either to put pressure on German Chancellor Helmut Kohl to return the archive to the PDS, or if Kohl felt this was politically impossible, to destroy it. The opening of the archive, Gysi wrote, was a “genuine catastrophe,” because it contained many secret documents. Publication of the documents would have “extremely unpleasant results not only for the PDS but for the Communist Party of the Soviet Union as well,” Gysi wrote. But his Soviet friends were no longer able to help him. The archive holds documents on Politburo decisions and directives that might prove crucial in prosecuting the former East German party hierarchy. In the end, the PDS offered to settle for 20 percent of the SED’s ill-gotten funds, forfeiting the rest as a gesture of goodwill toward the new state.
Not all observers were impressed by this compromise. Peter Gauweiler, Bavaria’s minister for development and ecological affairs at the time of reunification, and a member of the Christian Democratic Party, demanded that the PDS and the Deutsche Kommunistische Partei (DKP, the West German Communist Party), be outlawed: “Every month we learn of new crimes committed by the SED—terrible things, gruesome things,” Gauweiler said. “We cannot tolerate a successor organization to such an extremely criminal gang.”
Become a Patron!
True Information is the most valuable resource and we ask you to give back.
Sixty years after the Berlin Wall was erected, the spectre of the Stasi continues to loom over Germany.
Become a Patron!
True Information is the most valuable resource and we ask you to give back.
In a musty room somewhere inside a maze of offices in east Berlin, two women are working patiently on what may be the biggest puzzle the world has ever seen – more than half a billion pieces that together detail innumerable actions committed by East Germany’s secret police.
Continue reading “STASI: East Germany’s Secret Police -East Germany’s Stasi Files”Become a Patron!
True Information is the most valuable resource and we ask you to give back.
Liebe Leser,
Der ominöse “Blog”.
“DIE SCH****HAUSFLIEGE” so nennt der mutmassliche Stasi-Agent, Dioxin-Mörder und tatsächlich dutzende Male vorbestrafte Serienbetrüger Klaus-Dieter Maurischat seinen Blog:
Das muss man sich auf der Zunge zergehen lassen: “”DIE SCH****HAUSFLIEGE”
Das Höchstmass an Seriösität spricht schon aus der Namenswahl, dementsprechend sind auch die Infos und die Zuträger etwa- der dubiose Peter Ehlers, Strohmann von Fondsvermittler Gerd Bennewirtz.
Bis 2007 hiess ihr SJB-Werbeblatt “Der Fonds”. Dann hiess es “das Investment” – jetzt wollen sie das Original sein, obwohl wir in Deutschland seit 2000 erwiesenermassen auf dem Markt sind und in den angelsächischen Ländern schon viel länger – Methode “Big Brother” aus George Orwells “1984”.
Der Serienbetrüger Maurischat zeigt die Methode auf: Er kupfert unsere Artikel und die anderer Journalisten ab und versucht diese per Fälschung gegen uns zu verwenden – der Gipfel der unverschämten Lächerlichkeit.
Auf die anderen Absurditäten braucht man noch weniger einzugehen. Hingegen werden kritische Berichte gegen sie schnell gelöscht durch die hauseigene Google-Lösch-Truppe Marke RA Resch bzw durch Hacker-Promnys-Billig-Tricks überlagert.
All das kann den Wahrheits- und Reinigungsprozess zwar verlangsamen, aber nicht stoppen.
Offensichtlich ist der öffentliche Druck gegen die (Ruf)-Mörder von der CYBER-STASI schon so stark, dass sie immer mehr Fehler begehen und ihr wahres Naturell zeigen – das der tatsächlich vorbestraften Serienbetrüger, Rufmörder und wahrscheinlich sogar tatsächlichen Mörder.
Eine weitere absurde Pointe ist, dass Klaus-Dieter Maurischat unter seinen vielen Verurteilungen auch eine Verurteilung wegen des Betruges an seinem eigenen “GoMoPa”-Anleger hat (AZ: 28 Ls 85/05).
siehe
Ich hoffe Ihnen diesbezüglich bald weitere positive Fakten zum Schutz und im Interesse aller seriösen Marktteilnehmer liefern zu können.
Einen schönen Wochenausklang wünsche ich Ihnen.
Herzlichst Ihr
Magister Bernd Pulch
PS Diesen Artikel habe ich nur in Deutsch geschrieben, da dies für Amerikaner und Engländer sowieso ein vollkommen absurdes Theater wäre und sogar alte Vorurteile gegen uns Deutsche evozieren wüde.
Become a Patron!
True Information is the most valuable resource and we ask you to give back.
Liebe Leser, dear User
again the criminals are misusing my name after using Bpulch on twitter they now use also PulchBernd.
The twitter name Pulch is the original. Der Twitter-name Pulch ist das Original.
They did the same thing by using the name of our magazine “INVESTMENT”.
Deswegen heisst unsere Zeitschrift auch “INVESTMENT – das Original”.
Mittlerweile sind 30% der Besucher der von uns unterstützten, aber unabhängigen SJB-Fonds-Opfer.com-Webseite durch den Suchbegriff “Peter Ehlers-Betrug” auf die Webseite gelangt. Das spricht für sich.
Markenpiraten outen sich eben jeden Tag.
Meanwhile 30% of the visitors of the independet website http://www.sjb-fonds-opfer.com came by using the search term “Peter Ehlers – betrayal”…
Such trademark pirates are outing themselves every day.
It is clear now for everybody that they can not resist the punishment of God and the law.
Wieder zeigt die CYBER-STASI ihr wahres Gesicht. Nachdem sie sich schon den Namen BPulch widerrechtlich angeeignet haben, nun auch PulchBernd.
Genauso sind sie auch mit dem Namen meiner Zeitschrft INVESTMENT” verfahren.
Doch eines ist jetzt schon klar. Wer zu solchen Methoden greifen muss, kann im Markt nicht bestehen.
Identity theft is a form of fraud or cheating of another person’s identity in which someone pretends to be someone else by assuming that person’s identity, typically in order to access resources or obtain credit and other benefits in that person’s name. The victim of identity theft (here meaning the person whose identity has been assumed by the identity thief) can suffer adverse consequences if he or she is held accountable for the perpetrator’s actions. Organizations and individuals who are duped or defrauded by the identity thief can also suffer adverse consequences and losses, and to that extent are also victims.
The term identity theft was coined in 1964[1] and is actually a misnomer, since it is not literally possible to steal an identity as such – more accurate terms would be identity fraud or impersonation or identity cloningbut identity theft has become commonplace.
“Determining the link between data breaches and identity theft is challenging, primarily because identity theft victims often do not know how their personal information was obtained,” and identity theft is not always detectable by the individual victims, according to a report done for the FTC.[2] Identity fraud is often but not necessarily the consequence of identity theft. Someone can steal or misappropriate personal information without then committing identity theft using the information about every person, such as when a major data breach occurs. A US Government Accountability Office study determined that “most breaches have not resulted in detected incidents of identity theft”.[3] the report also warned that “the full extent is unknown”. A later unpublished study by Carnegie Mellon University noted that “Most often, the causes of identity theft is not known,” but reported that someone else concluded that “the probability of becoming a victim to identity theft as a result of a data breach is … around only 2%”.[4] More recently, an association of consumer data companies noted that one of the largest data breaches ever, accounting for over four million records, resulted in only about 1,800 instances of identity theft, according to the company whose systems were breached.[5]
A recent article entitled, “Cyber Crime Made Easy” explained the level to which hackers are using malicious software. As one security specialist named Gunter Ollmann said, “Interested in credit card theft? There’s an app for that.” This statement summed up the ease with which these hackers are accessing all kinds of information online. The new program for infecting users’ computers is called Zeus; and the program is so hacker friendly that even an inexperienced hacker can operate it. Although the hacking program is easy to use, that fact does not diminish the devastating effects that Zeus (or other software like Zeus) can do to a computer and the user. For example, the article stated that programs like Zeus can steal credit card information, important documents, and even documents necessary for homeland security. If the hacker were to gain this information, it would mean identity theft or even a possible terrorist attack. (Giles, Jim. “Cyber Crime Made Easy.” New Scientist 205.2752 (2010): 20-21. Academic Search Premier. EBSCO. Web. 3 Oct. 2010.)
Als Identitätsdiebstahl (auch Identitätsbetrug, Identitätsmissbrauch; engl. Identity Theft), wird die missbräuchliche Nutzung personenbezogener Daten (der Identität) einer natürlichen Person durch Dritte bezeichnet.
Die Bezeichnung als „Identitätsdiebstahl“ ist zwar sehr häufig, trifft aber die Sachlage nicht so gut, wie „Identitätsmissbrauch“, weil bei einem typischen Diebstahl dem Berechtigten etwas weggenommen wird, sodaß er es anschließend selbst nicht mehr hat. Beim Identitätsdiebstahl kann der Berechtigte seine Identität aber weiter verwenden.
Ziel eines Identitätsdiebstahls kann es sein, einen betrügerischen Vermögensvorteil zu erreichen oder den rechtmäßigen Inhaber der Identität in Misskredit zu bringen (Rufschädigung).
Bei einem Identitätsdiebstahl wird neben dem Namen eine Reihe persönlicher Daten wie beispielsweise Geburtsdatum, Anschrift, Führerschein- oder Sozialversicherungsnummern, Bankkonto– oderKreditkartennummern genutzt, um die Feststellung der tatsächlichen eigenen Identität zu umgehen oder diese zu verfälschen. Je mehr zueinander passende Daten der Missbrauchende hat, desto sicherer wird ihm die Vorspiegelung gelingen.
Bereits erlangte Daten können zur Ermittlung weiterer Daten genutzt werden. So geriet z.B. die Versicherungswirtschaft kürzlich in Erklärungsprobleme, weil ein Fernsehsender über zufällig im Strassenverkehr ausgewählte Kfz-Kennzeichen an die Versicherungsdaten der Halter – insbesondere die vollständigen Anschriften – gelangte und der Reporter dann bei den Fahrzeughaltern an der Tür erschien. Dabei wurde in den Telephongesprächen zunächst ein Unfall behauptet, mit dem man über den Zentralruf der Autoversicherer immer an den Namen der Versicherung und die Vertragsnummer kommt. Dann wurde bei der ermittelten Versicherung mit der Vertragsnummer angerufen und z.B. behauptet, man sei gerade umgezogen und wolle nur die Richtigkeit der Anschrift prüfen. In der Regel wurde dann von der betreffenden Versicherung der Name des Halters und die Anschrift genannt – im guten Glauben, daß man mit dem Halter spreche.
Die missbräuchliche Nutzung einer fremden Identität kann für die Opfer zur Verschuldung oder – wenn kriminelle Handlungen im Namen des Opfers des Identitätsdiebstahls durchgeführt werden – zu ungerechtenStrafen führen. Wird der Missbrauch aufgedeckt, so wird der Täter nicht nur für den Mißbrauch selbst bestraft, sondern muß den angerichteten finanziellen Schaden tragen und die Strafen für die im Namen des Opfers begangenen Taten übernehmen.
Insbesondere im E-Commerce, beispielsweise beim Durchführen von Transaktionen über das Internet-Auktionshaus Ebay, das bisher keine rechtsverbindliche Identitätsfeststellung durchführt, kannIdentitätsdiebstahl erhebliche Auswirkungen auf die Geschäftspartner haben. Nach den Urteilen des OLG Köln vom 6. September 2002, Aktenzeichen: 19 U 16/02 und des Amtsgerichts Erfurt vom 14. September 2001, Aktenzeichen: 28 C 2354/01 muss bei Vertragsabschlüssen im Internet der Verkäufer beweisen, dass der Käufer identisch mit dem angeblichen Account-Inhaber ist. Geschädigte durch Identitätsdiebstahl wehren sich nach Bekanntwerden der Straftat am effektivsten durch eine Strafanzeige (auch gegen Unbekannt) bei der örtlichen Polizei.
Illegal operierende Auskunfteien manipulieren durch Phishing, Pharming, und Spoofing die Computer der jeweiligen Zielpersonen und verschaffen sich damit zunächst die Identität (zum Beispiel Nickname in Verbindung mit einem Kennwort). Mit dieser gestohlenen Identität verschaffen sie sich dann Zugang zu Daten bei Onlineberatungen, Kontaktportalen, Internet-Auktionshäusern und anderen (Informationsdiebstahl) und vermarkten die gewonnenen Daten an „interessierte Kreise“ (Kriminelle).
Natürlich sind die Kriminellen der CYBER-STASI auf der Flucht oder im Zuchthaus.
Naturally the serial criminals of the CYBER-STASI is on the run or in detention.
Mit besten Grüssen
My warmest regards
Magister Bernd Pulch
Become a Patron!
True Information is the most valuable resource and we ask you to give back.
Little Klaus-Adolf (Maurisc) hahahaha (t) in his cute pink uniform
He fakes our Press releases and changes the names what a bloody good comedian
Erwiesen – Hilfsschüler und Magister Bernd Pulch von der Klitsche …
vor 8 Stunden gefunden – Die eigentlichen Köpfe von „General Global Media Ltd“ sind meiner Meinung nach wohl Stefan Schramm und STASI-Oberst Ehrenfried Stelzer. Bernd Pulch hat …
http://www.free-press-release.com/news-erwiesen-hilfssch-ler-und-magister-bernd-pulch-von-der-klitsche-general-global-media-ltd-war-stasi-offizier-…
more jokes from STASI-Klaus-Adolf at
http://sjb-fonds-opfer.com/?page_id=3683
Become a Patron!
True Information is the most valuable resource and we ask you to give back.
“Worse than the Gestapo.” —Simon Wiesenthal, Nazi hunter said about the notorious “Stasi”.
Less than a month after German demonstrators began to tear down the Berlin Wall on November 9, 1989, irate East German citizens stormed the Leipzig district office of the Ministry for State Security (MfS)—the Stasi, as it was more commonly called. Not a shot was fired, and there was no evidence of “street justice” as Stasi officers surrendered meekly and were peacefully led away. The following month, on January 15, hundreds of citizens sacked Stasi headquarters in Berlin. Again there was no bloodshed. The last bit of unfinished business was accomplished on May 31 when the Stasi radioed its agents in West Germany to fold their tents and come home.
The intelligence department of the Nationale Volksarmee (NVA), the People’s Army, had done the same almost a week earlier, but with what its members thought was better style. In-stead of sending the five-digit code groups that it had used for decades to message its spies in West Germany, the army group broadcast a male choir singing a children’s ditty about a duck swimming on a lake. There was no doubt that the singing spymasters had been drowning their sorrow over losing the Cold War in schnapps. The giggling, word-slurring songsters repeated the refrain three times: “Dunk your little head in the water and lift your little tail.” This was the signal to agents under deep cover that it was time to come home.
With extraordinary speed and political resolve, the divided nation was reunified a year later. The collapse of the despotic regime was total. It was a euphoric time for Germans, but reunification also produced a new national dilemma. Nazi war crimes were still being tried in West Germany, forty-six years after World War II. Suddenly the German government was faced with demands that the communist officials who had ordered, executed, and abetted crimes against their own people—crimes that were as brutal as those perpetrated by their Nazi predecessors—also be prosecuted.
The people of the former Deutsche Demokratische Republik (DDR), the German Democratic Republic, as the state had called itself for forty years, were clamoring for instant revenge. Their wrath was directed primarily against the country’s communist rulers—the upper echelon of the Sozialistische Einheitspartei (SED), the Socialist Unity Party. The tens of thousands of second-echelon party functionaries who had enriched themselves at the expense of their cocitizens were also prime targets for retribution.
Particularly singled out were the former members of the Stasi, the East German secret police, who previously had considered themselves the “shield and sword” of the party. When the regime collapsed, the Stasi had 102,000 full-time officers and noncommissioned personnel on its rolls, including 11,000 members of the ministry’s own special guards regiment. Between 1950 and 1989, a total of 274,000 persons served in the Stasi.
The people’s ire was running equally strong against the regular Stasi informers, the inoffizielle Mitarbeiter (IMs). By 1995, 174,000 had been identified as IMs, or 2.5 percent of the total population between the ages of 18 and 60. Researchers were aghast when they found that about 10,000 IMs, or roughly 6 percent of the total, had not yet reached the age of 18. Since many records were destroyed, the exact number of IMs probably will never be determined; but 500,000 was cited as a realistic figure. Former Colonel Rainer Wiegand, who served in the Stasi counterintelligence directorate, estimated that the figure could go as high as 2 million, if occasional stool pigeons were included.
“The Stasi was much, much worse than the Gestapo, if you consider only the oppression of its own people,” according to Simon Wiesenthal of Vienna, Austria, who has been hunting Nazi criminals for half a century. “The Gestapo had 40,000 officials watching a country of 80 million, while the Stasi employed 102,000 to control only 17 million.” One might add that the Nazi terror lasted only twelve years, whereas the Stasi had four decades in which to perfect its machinery of oppression, espionage, and international terrorism and subversion.
To ensure that the people would become and remain submissive, East German communist leaders saturated their realm with more spies than had any other totalitarian government in recent history. The Soviet Union’s KGB employed about 480,000 full-time agents to oversee a nation of 280 million, which means there was one agent per 5,830 citizens. Using Wiesenthal’s figures for the Nazi Gestapo, there was one officer for 2,000 people. The ratio for the Stasi was one secret policeman per 166 East Germans. When the regular informers are added, these ratios become much higher: In the Stasi’s case, there would have been at least one spy watching every 66 citizens! When one adds in the estimated numbers of part-time snoops, the result is nothing short of monstrous: one informer per 6.5 citizens. It would not have been unreasonable to assume that at least one Stasi informer was present in any party of ten or twelve dinner guests.
THE STASI OCTOPUS
Like a giant octopus, the Stasi’s tentacles probed every aspect of life. Full-time officers were posted to all major industrial plants. Without exception, one tenant in every apartment build-ing was designated as a watchdog reporting to an area representative of the Volkspolizei (Vopo), the People’s Police. In turn, the police officer was the Stasi’s man. If a relative or friend came to stay overnight, it was reported. Schools, universities, and hospitals were infiltrated from top to bottom. German academe was shocked to learn that Heinrich Fink, professor of theology and vice chancellor at East Berlin’s Humboldt University, had been a Stasi informer since 1968. After Fink’s Stasi connections came to light, he was summarily fired. Doctors, lawyers, journalists, writers, actors, and sports figures were co-opted by Stasi officers, as were waiters and hotel personnel. Tapping about 100,000 telephone lines in West Germany and West Berlin around the clock was the job of 2,000 officers.
Stasi officers knew no limits and had no shame when it came to “protecting the party and the state.” Churchmen, including high officials of both Protestant and Catholic denomina-tions, were recruited en masse as secret informers. Their offices and confessionals were infested with eavesdropping devices. Even the director of Leipzig’s famous Thomas Church choir, Hans-Joachim Rotch, was forced to resign when he was unmasked as a Spitzel, the people’s pejorative for a Stasi informant.
Absolutely nothing was sacred to the secret police. Tiny holes were bored in apartment and hotel room walls through which Stasi agents filmed their “suspects” with special video cam-eras. Even bathrooms were penetrated by the communist voyeurs.8 Like the Nazi Gestapo, the Stasi was the sinister side of deutsche Gründlichkeit (German thoroughness).
After the Berlin wall came down, the victims of the DDR regime demanded immediate retribution. Ironically, their demands were countered by their fellow Germans in the West who, living in freedom, had diligently built einen demokratischen Rechtsstaat, a democratic state governed by the rule of law. The challenge of protecting the rights of both the victims and the accused was immense, given the emotions surrounding the issue. Government leaders and democratic politicians recognized that there could be no “quick fix” of communist injustices without jeopardizing the entire system of democratic jurisprudence. Moving too rapidly merely to satisfy the popular thirst for revenge might well have resulted in acquittals or mistrials. Intricate jurisdictional questions needed to be resolved with both alacrity and meticulousness. No German government could afford to allow a perpetrator to go free because of a judicial error. The political fallout from any such occurrence, especially in the East, could prove fatal to whatever political party occupied the chancellor’s office in Bonn at the time.
Politicians and legal scholars of the “old federal states,” or West Germany, counseled patience, pointing out that even the prosecution of Nazi criminals had not yet been completed. Before unification, Germans would speak of Vergangenheitsbewältigung (“coming to grips with the past”) when they discussed dealing with Nazi crimes. In the reunited Germany, this word came to imply the communist past as well. The two were considered comparable especially in the area of human rights violations. Dealing with major Nazi crimes, however, was far less complicated for the Germans: Adolf Hitler and his Gestapo and Schutzstaffel (SS) chief, Heinrich Himmler, killed themselves, as did Luftwaffe chief and Vice Chancellor Hermann Göring, who also had been the first chief of the Gestapo. The victorious Allies prosecuted the rest of the top leadership at the International War Crimes Tribunal in Nürnberg. Twelve were hanged, three received life terms, four were sentenced to lesser terms of imprisonment (up to twenty years), and three were acquitted.
The cases of communist judges and prosecutors accused of Rechtsbeugung (perversion of justice) are more problematic. According to Franco Werkenthin, a Berlin legal expert charged with analyzing communist crimes for the German parliament, those sitting in judgment of many of the accused face a difficult task because of the general failure of German justice after World War II. Not a single judge or prosecutor who served the Nazi regime was brought to account for having perverted justice—even those who had handed down death sentences for infringements that in a democracy would have been considered relatively minor offenses. Werkenthin called this phenomenon die Jauche der Justiz, the cesspool of justice.
Of course, the crimes committed by the communists were not nearly as heinous as the Nazis’ extermination of the Jews, or the mass murders in Nazi-occupied territories. However, the communists’ brutal oppression of the nation by means including murder alongside legal execution put the SED leadership on a par with Hitler’s gang. In that sense, Walter Ulbricht or Erich Honecker (Ulbricht’s successor as the party’s secretary-general and head of state) and secret police chief Erich Mielke can justifiably be compared to Hitler and Himmler, respectively.
Arrest warrants were issued for Honecker and Mielke. The Soviet government engineered Honecker’s escape to Moscow, where he became the ward of Soviet President Mikhail S. Gor-bachev. When the Soviet Union crumbled, the new Russian President Boris Yeltsin expelled Honecker. He was arrested on his return to Germany, but a court decided against a trial when he was diagnosed with liver cancer. Honecker flew to Chile with his wife Margot to live with their daughter, a Chilean citizen by marriage. His exile was short, and he died in 1994. Mielke was not so fortunate: His KGB friends turned their backs on him. He was tried in Germany for the 1931 murder of two police officers, found guilty, and sentenced to six years in prison. Other charges, including manslaughter, were dismissed because of his advanced age and poor health.
Three other members of the twenty-one-member ruling Politburo also have been tried. Former Defense Minister Heinz Kessler was convicted of manslaughter in connection with the order to kill people who were trying to escape to the West. He received a seven-and-a-half-year term. Two others, members of the Central Committee and the National Defense Council, were tried with Kessler and sentenced to seven and a half years and five years, respectively. Politburo member Harry Tisch, who was also head of the communist trade union, was found guilty of embezzlement and served eighteen months. Six others, including Egon Krenz (Honecker’s successor as party chief), were charged with manslaughter. Krenz was found guilty, and on August 25, 1997, was sentenced to six and a half years in prison.
However, eight years after reunification, many of the 165 members of the Central Committee have not yet been put under investigation. In 1945, Nazis holding comparable or lesser positions were subject to automatic arrest by the Allies. They spent months or even years in camps while their cases were adjudicated. Moreover, the Nürnberg Tribunal branded the Reich and its Corps of Political Leaders, SS, Security Service (SD), Secret State Police (Gestapo), SA (Storm Troopers), and Armed Forces High Command criminal organizations. Similarly sweeping actions against communist leaders and functionaries such as Stasi officers were never contemplated, even though tens of thousands of political trials and human rights abuses have been documented. After the East German regime fell, German judicial authorities scrupulously avoided the appearance of waging witch-hunts or using the law as a weapon of vengeance. Prosecutors and judges made great efforts to be fair, often suspending legal action while requesting rulings from the supreme court on possible constitutional conflicts.
The victims of oppression clamored for revenge and demanded speedy prosecution of the erstwhile tyrants. They had little patience for a judicial system that was handicapped by a lack of unblemished and experienced criminal investigators, prosecutors, and judges. Despite these handicaps, the Berlin Central Police Investigations Group for Government Criminality, mindful that the statute of limitations for most communist crimes would expire at the end of 1999, made significant progress under its director Manfred Kittlaus, the able former director of the West Berlin state police. Kittlaus’s major task in 1998 was to investigate wrongful deaths, including 73 murders, 30 attempted murders, 583 cases of manslaughter, 2,938 instances of attempted manslaughter, and 425 other suspicious deaths. Of the 73 murders, 22 were classified as contract murders.
One of those tried and convicted for attempted contract murder was former Stasi collaborator Peter Haak, who was sentenced to six and a half years in prison. The fifty-two-year-old Haak took part in the Stasi’s 1981 Operation Scorpion, which was designed to pursue people who helped East Germans escape to the West. Proceedings against former General Gerhard Neiber, whose Stasi directorate was responsible for preventing escapes and for wreaking vengeance, were still pending in 1998.
Peter Haak’s murder plot was hatched after he befriended Wolfgang Welsch and his family. Welsch was a thorn in the side of the Stasi because of his success in smuggling people out of the DDR. Haak joined Welsch and the latter’s wife and seven-year-old daughter on a vacation in Israel, where he mixed a gram of thallium, a highly poisonous metallic chemical element used in rat poison, into the hamburgers he was preparing for a meal. Welsch’s wife and daughter vomited immediately after ingesting the poison and recovered quickly. Welsch suffered severe aftereffects, but eventually recovered: He had consumed a large amount of beer with the meal, and an expert testified that the alcohol had probably flushed the poison from his system.
Berlin Prosecutor General Christoph Schäfgen revealed that after the DDR’s demise 15,200 investigations had been launched, of which more than 9,000 were still active at the beginning of 1995. Indictments were handed down in 153 cases, and 73 perpetrators were convicted. Among those convicted were the aforementioned Politburo members as well as a number of border guards who had killed people who were trying to escape to the West.
Despite widespread misgivings about the judicial failures in connection with some Nazi crimes, a number of judges and prosecutors were convicted and jailed for up to three years for perversion of justice. In collusion with the Stasi, they had requested or handed down more severe sentences in political cases so that the state could collect greater amounts when the “convicts” were ransomed by the West German government. {The amount of ransom paid was governed by the time a prisoner had been sentenced to serve.)
The enormity of the task facing judicial authorities in reunified Germany becomes starkly evident when one examines the actions they have taken in all five former East German prov-inces and in East Berlin. From the end of 1990 to July 1996, 52,050 probes were launched into charges of murder, attempted murder, manslaughter, kidnapping, election fraud, and per-version of justice. A total of 29,557 investigations were halted for various reasons including death, severe illness, old age, or insufficient evidence. In those five and a half years, there were only 139 convictions.
The problem is even more staggering when cases of espionage are included. Between 1990 and 1996, the office of the federal prosecutor general launched 6,641 probes, of which 2,431 were terminated before trial—most due to the statute of limitations. Of 175 indictments on charges of espionage, 95 resulted in convictions. In addition to the cases handled at the federal level, the prosecutor general referred 3,926 investigations to state authorities, who terminated 3,344 without trial. State courts conducted 356 trials, resulting in 248 convictions. Because the statute of limitations for espionage is five years, the prosecutor general’s office told me in 1997 it was unlikely that more espionage trials would be conducted.
It is important to emphasize the difference between the statute’s application to so-called government crimes committed in East Germany before the collapse and to crimes, such as es-pionage, committed in West Germany. The Unification Treaty specifically permits the belated prosecution of individuals who committed acts that were punishable under the East German criminal code and who due to official connivance were not prosecuted earlier. There is no statute of limitations for murder. For most other crimes the limit is five years; however, due to the obstacles created by previous government connivance, the German parliament in 1993 doubled this time limit for prosecution of the more serious crimes. At the same time, the par-liament decreed that all cases must be adjudicated by the end of 2002. For less serious offenses, the statute would have run out on December 31, 1997, but the parliament extended it to 2000.
A number of politicians, jurists, and liberal journalists pleaded for a general amnesty for crimes committed by former DDR leaders and Communist Party functionaries. A former West German supreme court judge, Ernst Mahrenholz, said the “sharp sword of justice prevents reconciliation.” Schäfgen, the Berlin prosecutor general, had this answer for the former high court judge and other amnesty advocates:
I cannot agree. We are raising no special, sharp sword against East Germans. We must pursue state-sponsored injustice in exactly the same manner as we do when a thief steals or when one human being kills another. If one wants to change that, then we would have to do away with the entire criminal justice system, because punishment always hurts. We are not criminalizing an entire people but only an ever shrinking, small portion.
German Foreign Minister Klaus Kinkel, who was West Germany’s minister of justice when the nation was unified, said this at a session of parliament in September 1991: “We must punish the perpetrators. This is not a matter of a victor’s justice. We owe it to the ideal of justice and to the victims. All of those who ordered injustices and those who executed the orders must be punished; the top men of the SED as well as the ones who shot [people] at the wall.” Aware that the feelings against communists were running high among their victims, Kinkel pointed to past revolutions after which the representatives of the old system were collectively liquidated. In the same speech before parliament, he said:
Such methods are alien to a state ruled by law. Violence and vengeance are incompatible with the law in any case. At the same time, we cannot tolerate that the problems are swept under the rug as a way of dealing with a horrible past, because the results will later be disastrous for society. We Germans know from our own experience where this leads. Jewish philosophy formulates it in this way: “The secret of redemption is called remembering.”
Defense attorneys for communist officials have maintained that the difficulty lies in the fact that hundreds of thousands of political opponents were tried under laws of the DDR. Although these laws were designed to smother political dissent and grossly violated basic human rights and democratic norms, they were nonetheless laws promulgated by a sovereign state. How could one justly try individual Stasi officers, prosecutors, and judges who had simply been fulfilling their legal responsibility to pursue and punish violators of the law?
Opinions varied widely on whether and how the Stasi and other perpetrators of state-sponsored crimes should be tried. Did the laws of the DDR, as they existed before reunification, still apply in the east? Or was the criminal code of the western part of the country the proper instrument of justice in reunified Germany? However, these questions were moot: As Rupert Scholz, professor of law at the University of Munich and a Christian Democratic member of parliament, pointed out, the Unification Treaty specifies that the penal code of the DDR and not that of the Federal Republic of Germany (FRG) shall be applied to offenses committed in East Germany. Scholz’s view was upheld by the Bundesverfassungsgericht, the supreme court. Most offenses committed by party functionaries and Stasi officers—murder, kidnapping, torture, illegal wiretapping, mail robbery, and fraud—were subject to prosecution in reunified Germany under the DDR’s penal code. But this would not satisfy the tens of thousands of citizens who had been sent to prison under East German laws covering purely political offenses for which there was no West German equivalent.
Nevertheless, said Scholz, judicial authorities were by no means hamstrung, because West Germany had never recognized the East German state according to international law. “We have always said that we are one nation; that the division of Germany led neither to full recognition under international law nor, concomitantly, to a recognition of the legal system of the DDR,” Scholz said. Accordingly, West German courts have consistently maintained that West German law protects all Germans equally, including those living in the East. Therefore, no matter where the crimes were committed, whether in the East or the West, all Germans have always been subject to West German laws. Applying this logic, East German border guards who had either killed or wounded persons trying to escape to the West could be tried under the jurisdiction of West Germany.
The “one nation” principle was not upheld by the German supreme court. Prior to the court’s decision, however, Colonel General Markus Wolf, chief of the Stasi’s foreign espionage directorate, and some of his officers who personally controlled agents from East Berlin had been tried for treason and convicted. Wolf had been sentenced to six years in prison. The su-preme court ruling overturned that verdict and those imposed on Wolf’s cohorts, even though they had obtained the most closely held West German secrets and handed them over to the KGB. The maximum penalty for Landesverrat, or treason, is life imprisonment. In vacating Wolf’s sentence, the court said he could not be convicted because he operated only from East German territory and under East German law.
However, Wolf was reindicted on charges of kidnapping and causing bodily harm, crimes also punishable under East German law. The former Stasi three-star general, on March 24, 1955, had approved in writing a plan to kidnap a woman who worked for the U.S. mission in West Berlin. The woman and her mother were tricked by a Stasi agent whom the woman had been teaching English, and voluntarily got into his car. He drove them into the Soviet sector of the divided city, where they were seized by Stasi officers. The woman was subjected to psychological torture and threatened with imprisonment unless she signed an agreement to spy for the Stasi. She agreed. On her return to the American sector, however, the woman reported the incident to security officials. Wolf had committed a felony punishable by up to fifteen years’ imprisonment in West Germany. He was found guilty in March 1977 and sentenced to two years’ probation.
Those who have challenged the application of the statute of limitations to communist crimes, especially to the executions of citizens fleeing to the West, have drawn parallels to the notorious executive orders of Adolf Hitler. Hitler issued orders mandating the summary execution of Soviet Army political commissars upon their capture and initiating the extermination of Jews. An early postwar judicial decision held that these orders were equivalent to law. When that law was declared illegal and retroactively repealed by the West German Bundestag, the statute of limitations was suspended—that is, it never took effect. Many of those convicted in subsequent trials of carrying out the Führer’s orders were executed by the Allies. The German supreme court has ruled the same way as the Bundestag on the order to shoot people trying to escape to West Germany, making the statute of limitations inapplicable to such cases. The ruling made possible the trial of members of the National Defense Council who took part in formulating or promulgating the order. A number of border guards who had shot would-be escapees also have been tried and convicted.
Chief Prosecutor Heiner Sauer, former head of the West German Central Registration Office for Political Crimes, was particularly concerned with the border shootings. His office, located in Salzgitter, West Germany, was established in 1961 as a direct consequence of the Berlin Wall, which was erected on August 13 of that year. Willy Brandt, at the time the city’s mayor (later federal chancellor) had decided that crimes committed by East German border guards should be recorded. At his behest, a central registry of all shootings and other serious border incidents was instituted. Between August 13, 1961 and the opening of the borders on November 9, 1989, 186 border killings were registered. But when the Stasi archives were opened, investigators found that at least 825 people had paid with their lives for trying to escape to the West. This figure was reported to the court that was trying former members of the National Defense Council. In addition to these border incidents, the registry also had recorded a number of similar political offenses committed in the interior of the DDR: By fall 1991, Sauer’s office had registered 4,444 cases of actual or attempted killings and about 40,000 sentences handed down by DDR courts for “political offenses.”
During the early years of Sauer’s operation, the details of political prosecutions became known only when victims were ransomed by West Germany or were expelled. Between 1963 and 1989, West Germany paid DM5 billion (nearly US$3 billion) to the communist regime for the release of 34,000 political prisoners. The price per head varied according to the importance of the person or the length of the sentence. In some cases the ransom amounted to more than US$56,000. The highest sum ever paid to the East Germans appears to have been DM450,000 (US$264,705 using an exchange rate of US$1.70 to the mark). The ransom “object” in this case was Count Benedikt von Hoensbroech. A student in his early twenties, von Hoensbroech was attending a West Berlin university when the wall went up. He was caught by the Stasi while trying to help people escape and was sentenced to ten years at hard labor. The case at-tracted international attention because his family was related to Queen Fabiola of Belgium, who interceded with the East Germans. Smelling money, the East German government first demanded the equivalent of more than US$1 million from the young man’s father as ransom. In the end, the parties settled on the figure of DM450,000, of which the West German gov-ernment paid DM40,000 (about $23,529). Such ransom operations were fully controlled by the Stasi.
Political prisoners released in the DDR could not be registered by the West Germans because their cases remained secret. The victims were admonished to keep quiet or face another prison term. Nonetheless, in the first year after reunification, Sauer’s office added another 20,000 documented cases, for a total of 60,000. Sauer said he believed the final figure of all political prosecutions would be somewhere around 300,000. In every case, the Stasi was involved either in the initial arrest or in pretrial interrogations during which “confessions” were usually extracted by physical or psychological torture, particularly between the mid-1940s and the mid-1960s.
Until 1987, the DDR imposed the death penalty for a number of capital crimes, including murder, espionage, and economic offenses. But after the mid-1950s, nearly all death sentences were kept quiet and executions were carried out in the strictest secrecy, initially by guillotine and in later years by a single pistol shot to the neck. In most instances, the relatives of those killed were not informed either of the sentence or of the execution. The corpses were cremated and the ashes buried secretly, sometimes at construction sites. In reporting about one executioner who shot more than twenty persons to death, the Berlin newspaper Bildzeitung said that a total of 170 civilians had been executed in East Germany. However, Franco Werkenthin, the Berlin official investigating DDR crimes, said he had documented at least three hundred executions. He declined to say how many were for political offenses, because he had not yet submitted his report to parliament. “But it was substantial,” he told me. The true number of executions may never be known because no complete record of death sentences meted out by civil courts could be found. Other death sentences were handed down by military courts, and many records of those are also missing. In addition, German historian Günther Buch believes that about two hundred members of the Stasi itself were executed for various crimes, including attempts to escape to the West.
SAFEGUARDING HUMAN DIGNITY?
The preamble to the East German criminal code stated that the purpose of the code was to “safeguard the dignity of humankind, its freedom and rights under the aegis of the criminal code of the socialist state,” and that “a person can be prosecuted under the criminal code only in strictest concurrence with the law.” However, many of the codified offenses for which East German citizens were prosecuted and imprisoned were unique to totalitarian regimes, both fascist and communist.
Moreover, certain sections of the code, such as those on “Treasonable Relaying of Information” and “Treasonable Agent Activity,” were perversely applied, landing countless East Germans in maximum security penitentiaries. The victims of this perversion of justice usually were persons who had requested legal exit permits from the DDR authorities and had been turned down. In many cases, their “crime” was having contacted a Western consulate to inquire about immigration procedures. Sentences of up to two and a half years’ hard labor were not unusual as punishment for such inquiries.
Engaging in “propaganda hostile to the state” was another punishable offense. In one such case, a young man was arrested and prosecuted for saying that it was not necessary to station tanks at the border and for referring to border fortifications as “nonsense.” During his trial, he “admitted” to owning a television set on which he watched West German programs and later told friends what he saw. One of those “friends” had denounced him to the Stasi. The judge considered the accused’s actions especially egregious and sentenced him to a year and a half at hard labor.
Ironically, another part of this section of the criminal code decreed that “glorifying militarism” also was a punishable offense, although the DDR itself “glorified” its People’s Army beyond any Western norm. That army was clad in uniforms and insignia identical to those of the Nazi Wehrmacht, albeit without eagles and swastikas. The helmets, too, were differently shaped, but the Prussian goose step was regulation during parades.
A nineteen-year-old who had placed a sign in an apartment window reading “When justice is turned into injustice, resistance becomes an obligation!” was rewarded with twenty-two months in the penitentiary. Earlier, the youth had applied for an exit visa and had been turned down. A thirty-four-year-old father of two who also had been denied permission to leave the “workers’ and peasants’ state” with his family similarly advertised that fact with a poster reading “We want to leave, but they won’t let us.” The man went to prison for sixteen months. The “crimes” of both men were covered by a law on “Interference in Activities of the State or Society.”
Two letters—one to a friend in West Germany, seeking assistance to legally emigrate to the West, and another containing a similar appeal to Chief of State Honecker—brought a four-year sentence to their writer, who was convicted under two laws: those on “establishing illegal contacts” (writing to his friend) and on “public denigration” (writing to Honecker). The Stasi had illegally intercepted both letters.
The East German party chiefs were not content to rely only on the Stasi’s millions of informers to ferret out antistate sentiments. Leaving nothing to chance, they created a law that made the failure to denounce fellow citizens a crime punishable by up to five years’ imprisonment. One man was sentenced to twenty-three months for failing to report that a friend of his was preparing to escape to the West. The mandatory denunciation law had its roots in the statutes of the Socialist Unity Party, which were published in the form of a little red booklet. I picked up a copy of this booklet that had been discarded by its previous owner, a Stasi chauffeur, who had written “Ha, Ha” next to the mandate to “report any misdeeds, regardless of the person responsible, to leading party organs, all the way up to the Central Committee.”
Rupert Scholz, member of parliament and professor of law at the University of Munich, said many East Germans feel there is little determination among their Western brethren to bring the Stasi criminals to trial. “In fact, we already have heard many of them say that the peaceful revolution should have been a bloody one instead so they could have done away with their tormentors by hanging them posthaste,” Scholz told me.
The Reverend Joachim Gauck, minister to a Lutheran parish in East Germany, shared the people’s pessimism that justice would be done. Following reunification, Gauck was appointed by the Bonn government as its special representative for safeguarding and maintaining the Stasi archives. “We must at least establish a legal basis for finding the culprits in our files,” Gauck told me. “But it will not be easy. If you stood the millions of files upright in one line, they would stretch for 202 kilometers [about 121 miles]. In those files you can find an unbe-lievable number of Stasi victims and their tormentors.”
Gauck was given the mandate he needed in November 1991, when the German parliament passed a law authorizing file searches to uncover Stasi perpetrators and their informants. He viewed this legislation as first step in the right direction. With the evidence from Stasi files, the perpetrators could be removed from their public service jobs without any formal legal pro-ceedings. Said Gauck: “We needed this law badly. It is not reasonable that persons who served this apparatus of oppression remain in positions of trust. We need to win our people over to accepting that they are now free and governed by the rule of law. To achieve that, we must build up their confidence and trust in the public service.”
Searching the roughly six million files will take years. A significant number of the dossiers are located in repositories of the Stasi regional offices, sprinkled throughout eastern Germany. To put the files at the Berlin central repository in archival order would take one person 128 years. The job might have been made easier had the last DDR government not ordered the burning of thousands of Stasi computer tapes, ostensibly to forestall a witch-hunt. Thousands of files dealing with espionage were shredded and packed into 17,200 paper sacks. These were discovered when the Stasi headquarters was stormed on January 15, 1990. The contents of all of these bags now have been inspected. It took two workers between six and eight weeks to go through one bag. Then began the work of the puzzlers, putting the shredded pieces together. By the middle of 1997, fewer than 500 bags of shredded papers had been reconstructed—into about 200,000 pages. Further complicating matters was the lack of trained archivists and experts capable of organizing these files—to say nothing of the 37.5 million index cards bearing the names of informers as well as persons under Stasi surveillance—and interpreting their contents. Initially, funding for a staff of about 550 individuals was planned, at a total of about DM24.5 million annually (about US$15 million using an exchange rate of US$1.60). By 1997, the budget had grown to US$137 million and the staff to 3,100.
Stasi victims and citizens who had been under surveillance were allowed to examine their Stasi files. Within four years of reunification, about 860,000 persons had asked to inspect their case files, with 17,626 of those requests being received in December 1994 alone. By 1997, 3.4 million people had asked to see their files. Countless civil suits were launched when victims found the names of those who had denounced and betrayed them, and many family relationships and friendships were destroyed.
The rehabilitation of Stasi victims and financial restitution to them was well under way; but Gauck believed that criminal prosecution of the perpetrators would continue to be extremely difficult. “We can already see that leading SED functionaries who bear responsibility for the inhumane policies, for which they should be tried, are instead accused of lesser offenses such as corruption. It is actually an insult to democracy that a man like Harry Tisch is tried for embezzlement and not for being a member of the Politburo, where the criminal policies originated.”
The “Stasi files law,” as it is popularly known, also made it possible to vet parliamentarians for Stasi connections. Hundreds were fired or resigned—and a few committed suicide—when it was discovered that they had been Stasi informants. Among those who resigned was Lothar de Maiziere, the last premier of the DDR, who signed the unification agreement with West German Chancellor Helmut Kohl. He was a member of the East German version of the Christian Democratic Union, which like all noncommunist parties in the Eastern bloc had been totally co-opted by the regime. After reunification, he moved into parliament and was awarded the vice chairmanship of Kohl’s Christian Democratic Union. A lawyer, De Maiziere had functioned for years as an IM, an informer, under the cover name Cerny. De Maiziere at first denied he was Cerny, but the evidence was overwhelming. It was De Maiziere’s government that had ordered the destruction of the Stasi computer tapes.
THE COMMUNISTS’ POLITICAL SURVIVAL
De Maiziere, who had been a driving force behind prompt reunification, soon passed into oblivion; but twenty members of the old Communist Party, the SED, are still members of parliament. The SED changed its name in late 1989, when the DDR was collapsing, to the Party of Democratic Socialism (PDS). Its new leadership arrogantly dismissed their bloody past as irrelevant now that the word democratic had been adopted as part of their party’s name. If the elections of summer 1990 had taken place just a few months later and thus had been conducted under the law of reunified Germany, these individuals would not have won parliamentary seats. The West German electoral rules governing the proportional representation system require that a party garner at least 5 percent of the vote before it may enter parliament. In addition to choosing a party, voters cast a second ballot for a specific person. This is called a direct mandate. If any party falls below 5 percent but gets at least three direct mandates, that party is seated in parliament. As a one-time compromise in consideration of East Germany’s smaller population, the Bonn government accepted a 3-percent margin of party votes. Even so, the PDS barely made it into parliament.
In the 1994 general election, the first after reunification, the party polled 4.4 percent. Had it not been for the votes electing four persons by direct mandate, the PDS would have been excluded. The direct mandates all came from East Berlin districts heavily populated by unemployed, former Communist Party and government officials. One of the men elected directly was Gregor Gysi, a communist lawyer who had been accused of informing on his clients to the Stasi. Gysi denied the allegations and had obtained a temporary injunction barring a former East German dissident from making the assertion. However, a Hamburg court lifted the injunction in December 1994 on the basis of Stasi documents that indicated Gysi had no case.
Another candidate directly elected to parliament was Stefan Heym, a German-born writer who had emigrated to the United States after Hitler came to power, had changed his name from Helmut Flieg, and had become a U.S. citizen. He served in the U.S. Army as an officer during World War II, but switched sides in 1952 to live in East Germany, forfeiting his U.S. citizenship in order to become an East German citizen and a member of the Communist Party. A year later, on June 17, 1953, the East German people rose up in a revolt that was crushed by the Red Army. Had it not been for the intervention of the Soviets, Heym wrote afterward in the communist daily newspaper Berliner Zeitung, “the American bombing would have already begun. The shots against the rebels were fired to prevent war, rather than to begin one.” And when Stalin died, just four months earlier, Heym used the same newspaper to mourn the butcher of an estimated twenty million people as the “most loved man of our times.” Finally, in a speech on January 31, 1995, at a demonstration marking the 62nd anniversary of the Nazi takeover, the unrepentant Heym, now eighty-two years old, had the gall to say that the present climate in Germany was “very similar to that in 1933, and this frightens me.” It was a grotesque spectacle when Heym was accorded the “honor” of delivering the opening address of the 1965 parliamentary session traditionally reserved for the body’s oldest member. Despite vehement protests, parliamentary president Rita Süssmuth ruled to uphold the tradition.
One of the PDS members also retaining his seat was Hans Modrow. Modrow, a veteran communist, was SED district secretary in Dresden. It was a most powerful communal political position. Modrow was a vital cog in the apparatus of state repression. The local Stasi chief, Major General Horst Böhm, reported directly to him. Modrow was the one who ordered the Vopo, the People’s Police, to resort to violence in putting down massive protests during the turbulent days in fall 1989, just before the Berlin Wall fell. Hundreds of protesters were severely beaten and jailed. Böhm, the Dresden Stasi boss, was found shot dead in his office in early 1990, just before he was to appear before a commission that had been convened to settle the future of the communist state. His death was listed as a suicide. However, an unsubstantiated rumor has it that he was murdered to prevent him from testifying about Modrow’s despotic rule. Modrow was found guilty of election fraud in May 1993. The DDR hierarchy, according to the evidence, had ordered that the number of votes opposing the official slate in the 1989 election had to be fewer than in 1985. Modrow reported that only 2.5 percent of the ballots in his district were cast in opposition; but the true number was at least four times higher. The judge issued him a mere rebuke, refusing to imprison or fine him. The federal high court, which reviews sentences, ordered in November 1994 that Modrow stand trial again because the sentence “was too mild.” After a new trial in 1996 on charges of perjury, Modrow was sentenced to six months’ probation. A year later, parliament was still considering whether he should be deprived of his seat.
Unlike the Nazi Party’s finances and property, which were confiscated by the victorious Allies and turned over to the first West German government in 1949, the SED’s millions were inherited by the PDS, which spirited part of those funds out of the country when the East German government collapsed. The PDS also became custodian of the archives of the SED and refused anyone outside the party access to them. Shortly after reunification, in 1990, the courts ruled that the archives were state property. Judicial authorities as well as scholars were permitted to research them. Nevertheless, the SED archives were almost lost. In 1994, the German news magazine Focus discovered a letter dated March 1991, sent by Gregor Gysi in the capacity of PDS party chief to Vladimir A. Ivashko, assistant secretary-general of the Soviet Union’s Communist Party. In this letter, Gysi pleaded with Soviet leaders either to put pressure on German Chancellor Helmut Kohl to return the archive to the PDS, or if Kohl felt this was politically impossible, to destroy it. The opening of the archive, Gysi wrote, was a “genuine catastrophe,” because it contained many secret documents. Publication of the documents would have “extremely unpleasant results not only for the PDS but for the Communist Party of the Soviet Union as well,” Gysi wrote. But his Soviet friends were no longer able to help him. The archive holds documents on Politburo decisions and directives that might prove crucial in prosecuting the former East German party hierarchy. In the end, the PDS offered to settle for 20 percent of the SED’s ill-gotten funds, forfeiting the rest as a gesture of goodwill toward the new state.
Not all observers were impressed by this compromise. Peter Gauweiler, Bavaria’s minister for development and ecological affairs at the time of reunification, and a member of the Chris-tian Democratic Party, demanded that the PDS and the Deutsche Kommunistische Partei (DKP, the West German Communist Party), be outlawed: “Every month we learn of new crimes committed by the SED—terrible things, gruesome things,” Gauweiler said. “We cannot tolerate a successor organization to such an extremely criminal gang.”
Now it seems the STASI is back again in business after transforming it in to the CYBER-STASI of the 21st Century.
The serial betrayer and cyberstalker Klaus Maurischat is on the run again. The latest action against him (see below) cause him to react in a series of fake statements and “press releases” – one more absurd than the other. Insider analyze that his criminal organisation “GoMoPa” is about to fade away.
On our request the German criminal police (Kriminalpolizei) has opened new cases against the notorious “GoMoPa” organisation which already fled in the underground. Insiders say they have killed German journalist and watchdog Heinz Gerlach and their criminal record is bigger than the Encyclopedia – Britannica
The case is also directed against Google, Germany, whilst supporting criminal action of “GoMoPa” for years and therefore give them the chance to blackmail successfull businessman. This case is therefore an example and will be followed by many others as far as we can project. Furthermore we will bring the case to the attention of the German lawyers community which will not tolerate such misconduct by Googles German legal representative Dr. Arndt Haller and we will bring the case to the attention of Google Inc in Mountain View, USA, and the American ministry of Justice to stop the Cyberstalkers once and for all.
Besides that many legal institutions, individuals and firms have already contacted us to help to clarify the death of Mr. Heinz Gerlach and to prosecute his murderers and their backers.
The case number is ST/0148943/2011
In a series of interviews beginning 11 months before the sudden death of German watchdog Heinz Gerlach Berlin lawyer Joschen Resch unveilved secrets of Gerlach, insiders say. Secret documents from Mr Gerlachs computer were published on two dubious hostile German websites. Both have a lot of similarities in their internet registration. One the notorious “GoMoPa” website belongs to a n Eastern German organization which calls itself “
Numerous attempts have been made to stop our research and the publication of the stories by “GoMoPa” members in camouflage thus confirming the truth and the substance of it in a superior way.
Only two articles let the German audience believe that the famous journalist and watchdog Heinz Gerlach died on natural courses by blood pollution. The first one, published only hours after the death of Mr Heinz Gerlach by the notorious “GoMoPa” (see article below) and a second 3 days later by a small German local newspaper, Weserbergland Nachrichten.
Many people including the hostile Gerlach website “Akte Heinz Gerlach” doubted that this man who had so many enemies and friends would die of natural causes without any previous warning. Rumours occured that Mr. Gerlach’s doctor doubted natural courses at all. After many critical voices discussed the issue a small website of a small German local newspaper – which never before had reported about Mr. Heinz Gerlach and which is not even in the region of Mr Gerlachs home – published that Mr Gerlach died of blood pollution. Weserbergland-Nachrichten published a long article about the deadly consequences of blood pollution and did not even name the source of such an important statement. It claimed only that somebody of Gerlachs inner circle had said this. It is a proven fact that after the collpase of the Eastern German Communist Regime many former Communist propaganda agents went to regional newspapers – often in Western Germany like Günther Schabowski did the man who opened the “Mauer”.
The theatre stage was set: One day later the hostile Gerlach website “Akte Heinz Gerlach” took the agenda publishing that Mr Gerlach had died for natural causes without any further research at all.
This was done by a website which for months and months and months reported everything about Mr. Gerlach.
Furthermore a research proves that the technical details regarding the website hosting of this hostile website “Akte Heinz Gerlach” proves that there are common details with the hosting of “GoMoPa” and their affiliates as proven by the SJB-GoMoPa-victims (see http://www.sjb-fonds-opfer.com)
Insiders believe that the murderers of Mr. Heinz Gerlach are former members of the Eastern German Terror Organisation “Stasi” with dioxins. They also believe that “GoMoPa” was part of the plot. At “GoMoPa”’ a person named Siegfried Siewers was officialy responsible for the press but never appeared in public. “GoMoPa”-victims say that this name was a cameo for “GoMoPa” frontrunner Klaus Maurischat who is controlled by the Stasi Top Agent Ehrenfried Stelzner, Berlin.
Siegfried Sievers, a former Stasi member is responsible for the pollution of millions Germanys for many years with dioxins. This was unveiled at 5th of January 2011 by German prosecutors.
The victims say that Maurischat (probably also a Stasi cameo) and Sievers were in contact as Sievers acted as Stasi Agent and was in fact already a specialist in dioxins under the Communist Terror Regime in Eastern Germany.
Furthermore the Stasi Top Agent Ehrenfried Stelzer disguised as Professor for Criminal studies during the Communist Regime at the Eastern Berlin Humboldt University.
Background:
The man behind the Berlin lawyer Jochen Resch and his activities is Ehrenfried Stelzer, former Stasi Top officer in Berlin and “Professor for Criminal Studies” at the Eastern Berlin Humboldt University during the Communist regime, the SJB-GoMoPa-victims say (www.sjb-fonds-opfer.com) is responsable for the killing of German watchdog and journalist Heinz Gerlach.
These informations stem from various sources who were close to the criminal organization of GoMoPa in the last years. The SJB-GoMoPa say that the well-known German watchdog and journalist Heinz Gerlach was killed by former Stasi members with dioxins. Polychlorinated dibenzodioxins (PCDDs), or simply dioxins, are a group of organic polyhalogenated compounds that are significant because they act as environmental pollutants. They are commonly referred to as dioxins for simplicity in scientific publications because every PCDD molecule contains a dioxin skeletal structure. Typically, the p-dioxin skeleton is at the core of a PCDD molecule, giving the molecule a dibenzo-p-dioxin ring system. Members of the PCDD family have been shown to bioaccumulate in humans and wildlife due to their lipophilic properties, and are known teratogens, mutagens, and confirmed (avered) human carcinogens. They are organic compounds.
Dioxins build up primarily in fatty tissues over time (bioaccumulate), so even small exposures may eventually reach dangerous levels. In 1994, the US EPA reported that dioxins are a probable carcinogen, but noted that non-cancer effects (reproduction and sexual development, immune system) may pose an even greater threat to human health. TCDD, the most toxic of the dibenzodioxins, is classified as a Group 1 carcinogen by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC).
In 2004, a notable individual case of dioxin poisoning, Ukrainian politician Viktor Yushchenko was exposed to the second-largest measured dose of dioxins, according to the reports of the physicians responsible for diagnosing him. This is the first known case of a single high dose of TCDD dioxin poisoning, and was diagnosed only after a toxicologist recognized the symptoms of chloracne while viewing television news coverage of his condition.
German dioxin scandal: In January 2011 about 4700 German farms were banned from making deliveries after tests at the Harles und Jentzsch plant in the state of Schleswig-Holstein showed high levels of dioxin. Again this incident appears to involve PCBs and not PCDDs at all. Dioxin were found in animal feed and eggs in many farms. The person who is responsible for this, Siegfried Sievert is also a former Stasi Agent. At “GoMoPa” the notorious Eastern-Berlin press agency (see article below) one of the henchmen acted under the name of “Siegfried Siewert”.
Further evidence for the killing of Mr.Heinz Gerlach is provided by the SJB-GoMoPa-victims by analyzing the dubious role of former Stasi-Top-agent Ehrenfried Stelzer, also a former “Professor for Crime Studies” under the Communist regime in Eastern Germany and the dubious role of “detective” Medard Fuchsgruber. Both are closely tied to the dubious “GoMoPa” and Berlin lawyer Jochen Resch.
According to the SJB-GoMoPa-victims is Berlin lawyer Jochen Resch the mastermind of the criminal organization “GoMoPa2. The victims state that they have a source inside “GoMoPa” who helped them discover the shocking truth. The so-called “Deep Throat from Berlin” has information that Resch had the idea to found the criminal organization “GoMoPa” and use non-existing Jewish lawyers named Goldman, Morgenstern & Partner as camouflage. Their “office” in Madison Avenue, New York, is a mailbox. This is witnessed by a German Ex-Patriot, a lawyer, whose father, Heinz Gerlach, died under strange circumstances.
Resch seems to use “GoMoPa” as an instrument to blackmail parts of the German Property and Investment section.
Become a Patron!
True Information is the most valuable resource and we ask you to give back.
“Worse than the Gestapo.” — Simon Wiesenthal, Nazi hunter
„Lauschen, spähen, schnüffeln: Vor 60 Jahren wurde die DDR-Staatssicherheit gegründet. Mehr als 91.000 hauptamtliche und doppelt so viele inoffizielle Mitarbeiter garantierten der SED die Macht. Ein Geheimdienst im klassischen Sinn war der Apparat nie, eher schon eine kriminelle Vereinigung mit tödlichen Methoden“, schreibt die angesehene Tageszeitung „DIE WELT“.
„Genau so verfährt auch der „NACHRICHTENDIENST“ „ GoMoPa“ , erläutert Rainer W. (Name wurde aus Sicherheitsgründen anonymisiert). Er war über mehrere Monate „inoffizieller“ Mitarbeiter des „NACHRICHTENDIENSTES“ „GoMoPa“, einem angeblichen Zusammenschluss jüdischer US-Rechtsanwälte namens Goldman, Morgenstern & Partner LLC, die noch nie jemand gesehen hat. Stattdessen sehen die Personen, die sich mit „GoMoPa“ beschäftigen nur die Totenkopfmaske stalinistischer STASI-Hacker, Erpresser und Cyberstalker.
Rainer W.: „Die eigentlichen Köpfe von „GoMoPa“ sind meiner Meinung nach wohl RA Jochen Resch und STASI-Oberst Ehrenfried Stelzer. Maurischat (ein Deckname) hat nicht das Format so eine Organisation aufzuziehen.“
Seit Jahren schon vesuchen die vorbestraften Serien-Kriminellen um das „Aushängeschild“ Klaus-Dieter Maurischat die deutsche Wirtschaft zu infiltrieren. Doch erst seit dem mutmasslichen Mord an Heinz Gerlach und den monatelangen Attacken gegen unser Haus sind viele Fakten recherchiert und zu Tage gekommen.
Vor allem über die Methoden des „NACHRICHTENDIENSTES“ – aber auch über dessen Hintermänner in Berlin, denn in New York existiert sowieso nur eine Briefkastenadresse und auch das „Büro“ in Berlin ist ein „virtuelles Regus-Büro“.
Die Fassade soll den „NACHRICHTENDIENST“ tarnen.
„DIE WELT“ schreibt: „40 Jahre lang, von der Gründung bis zu ihrer schrittweisen Auflösung zwischen Dezember 1989 und März 1990, war die Staatssicherheit der wichtigste Machtgarant der SED-Herrschaft. In dieser Zeit wucherte der Apparat immer mehr, bis schließlich mehr als 91.000 hauptamtliche Mitarbeiter für das MfS tätig waren.
Dieses Heer betreute eine Schattenarmee mit 189.000 „Inoffiziellen Mitarbeitern“ (IM). Statistisch gesehen kam in der DDR auf 55 erwachsene Bürger ein Vollzeit- oder Teilzeit-Stasi-Mann. Zum Vergleich: Im kommunistischen Polen lag das Verhältnis bei 1500 zu eins.
Der Apparat hat ungezählte Verbrechen zu verantworten. Darin folgte er seinen sowjetischen Vorbildern, der Tscheka (stolz nannten sich Stasi-Leute „Tschekisten“) und dem KGB. Vor allem aber prägte ein Mann das kriminelle Gebaren des MfS: Erich Mielke hatte sich schon als junger Mann 1931 als Attentäter in Berlin bewährt, als er im Auftrag der KPD zusammen mit einem Mittäter zwei Berliner Polizeioffiziere erschoss.
Der Doppelmörder konnte flüchten und führte im Spanischen Bürgerkrieg stalinistische Säuberungen in den eigenen Reihen durch. Im Sommer 1945 kehrte er nach Berlin zurück und übernahm sofort eine führende Position in der neu eingerichteten Polizei – interessanterweise in jenem Gebäude, das bis 1990 Sitz und Postanschrift der Staatssicherheit sein sollte.“
Zu den ungezählten Verrechen zählen Morde, Entführungen, Raub, Erpressung, Bespitzelung und jahrelange Gefängnishaft für Regime-Kritiker.
Jörg Berger flüchtete 1979 aus der DDR. Auch im Westen blieb die Stasi sein ständiger Begleiter. Jörg Berger berichtete vor seinem frühen Tod: „Nehmen wir den Fall des Spielers Lutz Eigendorf. Der war kurz vor mir geflüchtet und hat dann durch viel Medienpräsenz noch selbst dazu beigetragen, den Rummel anzufachen. Er starb bei einem Unfall auf der Autobahn, höchstwahrscheinlich hat ihn die Stasi vor seinem Tod geblendet. Entsprechendes findet sich jedenfalls in seiner Akte. Die Leute um Eigendorf waren die Leute, die ich auch um mich versammelt hatte. Dazu war er ein junger Spieler, ich ein gestandener Trainer. So hat man mir die Autoreifen zerstochen, auf der Autobahn löste sich ein Rad – und monatelang hatte ich Lähmungserscheinungen. Vermutlich von einer Bleivergiftung, die die Stasi initiiert hatte. Die haben mir wohl etwas in ein Getränk gemischt.“
„Der „Blitz“ traf Wilhelm van Ackern am 24. März 1955, kurz nach 22.30 Uhr – in Form von K.-o.-Tropfen in frisch gebrühtem Bohnenkaffee. Der vermeintliche Informant Fritz Weidmann hatte den 39-jährigen Fotohändler in eine konspirative Wohnung in der Kreuzberger Gneisenaustraße gelockt und ihm dort den vergifteten Kaffee serviert.
Nach wenigen Minuten wurde van Ackern übel; gestützt von Weidmann, verließ er die Wohnung. Doch auf der Straße erwartete ein weiterer Mann die beiden mit einem Wagen. Wilhelm van Ackern wurde im Schutz der Dunkelheit hineingestoßen und über die noch offene Sektorengrenze von West- nach Ost-Berlin ins Untersuchungsgefängnis Hohenschönhausen gefahren. Erst neuneinhalb Jahre später, teilweise verbüßt in der berüchtigten DDR-Sonderhaftanstalt Bautzen II, kam er frei und durfte zurück nach West-Berlin.“
Von Arsen bis Zyankali:
|
|
|
Dieter Baumann ist nicht totzukriegen. Nach einer zweijährigen Dopingsperre geht er jetzt wieder an den Start. 1999 eine positive Dopingprobe. Dass er sich selbst gedopt hat, glauben heute nur noch seine Feinde. Und Feinde aus der ehemaligen DDR hatte er genug: Dieter Baumann 1991: Dieter Baumann 1994: Dieter Baumann 1998: In Baumanns Zahnpasta fanden Kontrolleure das Dopingmittel Norandrostendion. Wie man Zahnpasta-Tuben mit Gift präpariert, kann man in den Stasiakten nachlesen: mit einem Glasröhrchen im hinteren Teil der Z-Tube. Die Zeitschrift „Laufzeit“ im Osten Berlins fragte ein Jahr vor Baumanns Dopingtest nach einem „Messias“ der Antidopingbewegung und beendete den Kommentar mit dem Satz: „Muß man sich angesichts morgendlicher Hochform eines Tages gar fragen: Ist meine Zahnpasta noch sauber?“ Laufzeit-Chef Wolfgang Weising, früher Leichtathletikautor bei der NVA-Zeitung „Volksarmee“ – sagte gegenüber report AUS MÜNCHEN, diese Formulierung sei Zufall gewesen. Baumann, das Opfer eines Komplotts? Selbst die Tübinger Kriminalpolizei schließt heute aus, dass sich Baumann selbst gedopt hat. Auch wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen belegen: Er konnte seine Zahnpasta nicht nachträglich manipuliert haben. Baumanns größte Entlastung: die Dosis war niemals leistungssteigernd. Baumann selbst will nicht öffentlich spekulieren, wer ihm das Dopingmittel unterjubelte. Es müsse aber jemand aus seinem engen Umfeld sein. Dieter Baumann, Olympiasieger 1992: Die Existenz von Kritikern vernichten, das war eine Aufgabe der Stasi. Der Rechtsmediziner Prof. Thomas Daldrup von der Universität Düsseldorf hat die sogenannte „Toxdat“-Studie der DDR untersucht – eine 900 Seiten starke Datenbank über Giftmordmöglichkeiten. Hier ist detailliert beschrieben wie sich selbst Laien Gifte beschaffen können und wie man einen Mord am besten verschleiert. Prof. Thomas Daldrup, Präsident Gesellschaft für Toxikologische und Forensische Chemie: Hinweise auf die Verschleierung provozierter Unfälle finden sich ebenfalls in Toxdat: „Vortäuschung von Verkehrsunfällen durch Auslösung von sekundenschneller Bewusstlosigkeit mittels Minigasgenerator in Belüftungsschächten von PKW.“ Da ist zum Beispiel der rätselhafte Verkehrsunfall des ehemaligen DDR-Fußballspielers Lutz Eigendorf im Jahr 1983. Vier Jahre zuvor war er nach einem Spiel in der Bundesrepublik nicht in die DDR zurückgekehrt. Er war ein leidenschaftlicher Autofahrer, seine Fahrweise risikovoll, das notierten die Spitzel der Stasi im Westen. Kurz vor seinem Verkehrsunfall stoppt die Stasi seine Fahrtzeit und die genaue Streckenführung seines täglichen Wegs vom Stadion nach Hause. Zum Unfallhergang tauchen vor zwei Jahren neue Hinweise auf. Wurde Eigendorf gezielt geblendet? In den Giftakten der Stasi heißt es: „verblitzen, Eigendorf“. Hatte man Eigendorf heimlich ein pupillenerweiterndes Mittel verabreicht? Die Staatsanwaltschaft Berlin kann Fragen dazu nicht beantworten, da eine Obduktion nicht angeordnet wurde, auch nach Auftauchen der neuen Stasidokumente nicht. Ein weiterer Fall: Fußballtrainer Jörg Berger liest seine Stasiakten. Nach seiner Flucht aus der DDR wurde der Star-Trainer ´79 zum Staatsfeind. Jörg Berger, Fußballtrainer Alemannia Aachen: Die Stasi wusste, dass Berger Angst hatte vor einem möglichen Auftragsmord, um weitere Fußballer vor einer Flucht abzuhalten: „BERGER bekundete angeblich (…), daß es ihm nicht so ergehen soll wie EIGENDORF.“ Die Stasi glaubte, dass Berger der Drahtzieher war für die Republikflucht mehrerer Fußballer. Als Berger dann Mitte der 80er Jahre als Trainer auf dem Sprung in die 1. Bundesliga war und sich die DDR-Sportler Falko Götz und Dirk Schlegel nach Westdeutschland absetzten, schien Berger für die DDR unerträglich zu werden. „Im operativen Vorgang ‚Ball’ wurde operativ herausgearbeitet, daß BERGER wesentlichen Anteil am Verrat von GÖTZ und SCHLEGEL hatte.“ Jörg Berger, Fußballtrainer, Alemannia Aachen: 1986 litt Berger unter rätselhaften Lähmungserscheinungen. Der Erklärungsversuch damals: eine Virusinfektion. Im Auftrag von report AUS MÜNCHEN hat der Rechtsmediziner Prof. Wolfgang Eisenmenger vor dem Hintergrund von Toxdat Bergers Krankenakten analysiert. Jetzt scheint festzustehen: Berger wurde vergiftet. Prof. Wolfgang Eisenmenger, Klinikum Innenstadt der Universität München, Institut für Rechtsmedizin: Die Anleitung, eine Arsenikvergiftung zu verschleiern – liefert ebenfalls wieder die DDR-Giftstudie Toxdat. Frühere Stasi-Mitarbeiter wollten auch ihn ausschalten, das glaubt der Bundestagsabgeordnete Hartmut Büttner aus Hannover. 1995 hatte er einen mysteriösen Autounfall, der ihn beinahe das Leben kostete. Nach der Wiedervereinigung hatte der Abgeordnete zu den Hintermännern der „Toxdat“-Studie recherchiert und sich sehr für die Offenlegung der Stasi-Akten durch die Gauck-Behörde eingesetzt. Hartmut Büttner, CDU-Bundestagsabgeordneter 1991: Als Büttner ´95 auf gerader, staubtrockener Straße verunglückte, findet keine Filigranuntersuchung des Wagens statt. Während er im Koma liegt, gibt die Polizei das Schrottauto frei. Eine Speditionsfirma zahlt dafür eilig das Sechsfache seines Werts. Büttner wurde mitgeteilt: Hartmut Büttner, CDU-Bundestagsabgeordneter: Viele Unfälle und Erkrankungen von ehemaligen DDR-Systemkritikern scheinen noch lange nicht geklärt. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ebenso wie der Todesfall Heinz Gerlach zur Gänze aufgeklärt werden muss
„DIE WELT“ berichtet: „Mielkes Leute pfuschten in das Leben von Millionen DDR-Bürgern hinein, zerstörten berufliche oder private Hoffnungen und zersetzten routinemäßig ganze Familien. Außerdem schädigte die Stasi im Laufe der Jahrzehnte Hunderttausende Menschen in der SED-Diktatur vorsätzlich, brach unangepasste Charaktere mit psychischem Druck.
In jedem DDR-Bezirk unterhielt das MfS eigene Untersuchungshaftanstalten, in Potsdam zum Beispiel in der Lindenstraße 54/55. In Berlin gab es neben der Zentrale in Lichtenberg die Stasi-Bezirksverwaltung Berlin, die bis 1985 in einem ehemaligen Krankenhaus an der Prenzlauer Allee und danach in einem 100 Millionen DDR-Mark teuren Neubau am Tierpark Friedrichsfelde amtierte, und das große Sperrgebiet in Hohenschönhausen, wo neben einem Gefängnis auch das streng geheime NS-Archiv der Stasi und technische Abteilungen saßen.
Neben der alltäglichen Unterdrückung stehen die schweren Gewalttaten des MfS; sie umfassen praktisch alle Paragrafen des DDR-Strafgesetzbuchs. So verschleppten Stasi-Kommandos im Laufe der Zeit mindestens 500, vielleicht aber auch bis zu tausend Menschen in die DDR – westliche Agenten, Überläufer aus den eigenen Reihen und SED-Kritiker vor allem. Einige von ihnen, zum Beispiel der vormalige Volkspolizei-Chef Robert Bialek, überlebten die Verschleppung nicht; andere, wie die „Verräter“ Paul Rebenstock und Sylvester Murau, wurden nach manipulierten Prozessen hingerichtet.
Ein juristisch verbrämter Mord war die Hinrichtung des MfS-Hauptmanns Werner Teske 1981. Er hatte mit dem Gedanken gespielt, in den Westen überzulaufen, allerdings nie einen konkreten Versuch dazu unternommen. Obwohl selbst das scharfe DDR-Strafrecht die Todesstrafe nur für vollendeten schweren Landesverrat vorsah, den Teske unzweifelhaft nicht begangen hatte, wurde er im Leipziger Gefängnis durch Genickschuss getötet.
Auch direkte Mordanschläge beging die Stasi. So lauerte 1976 ein Spezialkommando der Stasi, die „Einsatzkompanie der Hauptabteilung I“, auf westlicher Seite der innerdeutschen Grenze dem Fluchthelfer Michael Gartenschläger auf. Er wollte dort eine Splittermine vom Typ SM-70 abmontieren, die berüchtigte „Selbstschussanlage“. Vier Männer der Einsatzkompanie erwarteten ihn und eröffneten sofort das Feuer, als der langjährige politische Gefangene an den Grenzzaun heranschlich. MfS-Generalleutnant Karl Kleinjung, der Chef der Hauptabteilung I, hatte zuvor befohlen, „den oder die Täter festzunehmen bzw. zu vernichten“.
Auch der Schweizer Fluchthelfer Hans Lenzlinger wurde wohl im Auftrag des MfS 1979 in seiner Züricher Wohnung erschossen. Vielleicht war Bruno Beater, der ranghöchste Stellvertreter Mielkes und Experte für „nasse Jobs“, in den Anschlag verwickelt; aufgeklärt wurde dieser Mord aber nie.
Nicht das befohlene Ziel erreichten dagegen Mordanschläge gegen andere Fluchthelfer. Kay Mierendorff, der Hunderten DDR-Bürgern gegen fünfstellige Summen in die Freiheit verhalf, bekam im Februar 1982 eine Briefbombe zugeschickt, die ihn schwer verletzte und bleibende Schäden hervorrief.
Einen anderen „Hauptfeind“ der SED, den Fluchthelfer Wolfgang Welsch, vergiftete ein in seinen Kreis eingeschleuster Stasi-Agent im Sommer 1981 mit dem extrem toxischen Schwermetall Thallium; den Tod von Welschs Ehefrau und ihrer Tochter nahm der Stasi-IM billigend in Kauf.
Geplant, aber wohl nicht ausgeführt worden sind Mordanschläge auf Rainer Hildebrandt, den Kopf der DDR-kritischen „Arbeitsgemeinschaft 13. August“, die von ihrem Haus am Checkpoint Charlie aus das Unrecht der Mauer unnachgiebig anprangerte, und auf den Friedrichshainer Pfarrer Rainer Eppelmann, der unter Erich Honecker zeitweise als „Staatsfeind Nummer eins“ der SED galt. Umstritten ist dagegen, ob der DDR-Fußballstar Lutz Eigendorf 1983 von der Stasi durch einen vorsätzlich herbeigeführten Autounfall ermordet wurde. Vieles spricht dafür; der letzte Beweis ist in den allerdings bisher nur zum Teil sachgerecht erschlossenen Akten der Birthler-Behörde nicht aufgetaucht.
Noch öfter als potenziell tödliche Methoden wandten die Stasi-Experten allerdings das Mittel der Erpressung an. In verschiedenen Hotels für westliche Touristen in der ganzen DDR waren über den Betten Kameras eingebaut; auf interessante Ausländer wurden gezielt Prostituierte der Stasi angesetzt, um sie später mit kompromittierenden Fotos erpressen zu können. Das Gleiche versuchte das MfS auch mit Heinrich Lummer, dem West-Berliner CDU-Politiker. Über Jahre hinweg pflegte er eine geheime Beziehung zu einer Ost-Berlinerin, die in Wirklichkeit wohl von Anfang an als Spitzel auf ihn angesetzt war. 1981/82 versuchte das MfS, Lummer zu erpressen, was aber misslang.
Rund 40 Jahre lang garantierte die Stasi als „Schild und Schwert der Partei“ die Existenz der SED-Diktatur. Doch manches misslang Mielkes Mannen auch. So erwies sich beispielsweise die Suche nach den Autoren eines anonymen, kritischen Aufrufs als erfolglos, der 1969 an der Humboldt-Universität auftauchte. Trotz enormen Aufwandes und Kosten von rund einer Million DDR-Mark konnte das MfS die Verantwortlichen, die Studenten Rainer Schottländer und Michael Müller, nie überführen. So wurde ihr Protest zum „teuersten Flugblatt der Welt“.“
Insider Rainer W.:“Genau diese Methodenw erden heute von „GoMoPa“ und deren Hintermännern weider angewandt – natürlich verfeinert und mit Internet-Cyberstalking-Taktiken garniert.
Hinzu kommt der systematische Rufmord via Google und mit falschen Gerüchten, Erpresseranrufen, Morddrohungen, Cyberattacken, Kontoplünderungen und die Zerstörung von Geschäftsbeziehung durch
Systematisch gestreutes Misstrauen. Nehmen Sie all dies zusammen, dann haben Sie die STASI von heute: den „NACHRICHTENDIENST“ „GoMoPa“.“
Become a Patron!
True Information is the most valuable resource and we ask you to give back.
Dear readers
now “GoMoPa” started twittering a BPulch to desinfrom the public
My accounts are
– Pulch
– MagisterPulch
– BerndPulch
– MABerndPulch
– BerndPulchMa
I t shows that nobody believes in their fake press releases and blog entries.
They need my identity to be credible…
Serial betrayers until the very end.
Can you imagine how desperate they are ?
best regards
Bernd Pulch
Become a Patron!
True Information is the most valuable resource and we ask you to give back.
|
||||||||||||
Sehr geehrter Herr XYXYXY, wir möchten Ihnen mitteilen, dass wir die Löschung der folgenden Webseite(n) aus den Suchergebnissen unter Google.de veranlasst haben: xxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxx Wir weisen darauf hin, dass eine Kopie jedes rechtlichen Hinweises, den wir erhalten, zur Veröffentlichung und Registrierung an ein Partnerunternehmen weitergeleitet wird. Ihr Brief wird deshalb (ohne Angabe Ihrer persönlichen Daten) zur Veröffentlichung an Chilling Effects ( http://www.chillingeffects.org ) weitergeleitet. Sie können ein Beispiel für eine solche Veröffentlichung unter http://www.chillingeffects.org/dmca512/notice.cgi?NoticeID=861 sehen. Ein Link zu Ihrem veröffentlichten Brief wird anstatt des entfernten Contents in den Google-Suchergebnissen angezeigt. Mit freundlichen Grüßen Ihr Google-Team Google Inc. Legal Support 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway Mountain View, CA 94043 USA
Become a Patron!
True Information is the most valuable resource and we ask you to give back.
Viel Spass beim Lesen !
Mit besten Grüssen
Nice lecture !
With best regards
Magister Bernd Pulch
Become a Patron!
True Information is the most valuable resource and we ask you to give back.
Der mehrfach vorbestrafte Serienbetrüger Klaus Maurischat („GoMoPa“)
verbreitet eine neue „Wirecard-Ente“, nachdem wir sein Päderasten-Portal
„GoMoPa4kids.net“ enttarnt haben.
Wir haben ihn wegen Verleumdung und anderer schwerwiegender Delikte angezeigt.
Das Handelsblatt schreibt über Maurischat und GoMopa: „Die Bundesanstalt für
Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht BaFin hat aufgrund der merkwürdigen
Kursturbulenzen der Wirecard -Aktie eine förmliche Untersuchung des Falles
eingeleitet. BaFin prüft mögliche Marktmanipulationen nach Falschbericht des
Internetdienstes Gomopa. Zwei der Gomopa-Gründer wurden schon 2006 wegen Betrugs
verurteilt…
Mark Vornkahl, einer der Gründer von Gomopa wies den Vorwurf der
Kursmanipulation gestern zurück. Man wolle nur die Wahrheit aufdecken. Es ist
allerdings nicht das erste Mal, dass Gomopa-Vertreter ins Zwielicht geraten.
2006 wurden Vornkahl und Mitgründer Klaus Maurischat wegen Betrugs an einem
Anleger verurteilt. Maurischat gab gestern gegenüber dem Handelsblatt weitere
Verurteilungen zu. Es habe sich dabei jedoch nicht um Anlagebetrug gehandelt.
;siehe Beweis:
http://www.handelsblatt.com/finanzen/boerse-inside/marktgeruechte-finanzaufsicht-untersucht-kursachterbahn-bei-wirecard;2557254
und die Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung (FAZ) schreibt über Maurischat und
GoMoPa.
“Nach Informationen der F.A.Z. sollen unter anderem gezielt über den
Finanznachrichtendienst Gomopa im Internet Gerüchte über Pennystocks gestreut
worden sein. Gomopa steht für Goldman Morgenstern & Partners Consulting LLC. Auf
ihrer Internetseite hat Gomopa „Transparenz in Sachen Finanzen, Vorsorge und
Geldanlage“ versprochen, doch ihr Chef Klaus Maurischat saß als mutmaßlicher
Betrüger schon in Untersuchungshaft.
Seit einigen Tagen ist die Internetseite www.gomopa.net offline, und es
kursieren Gerüchte über finanzielle Unregelmäßigkeiten. Immer wieder ist Gomopa
in juristische Streitigkeiten verwickelt. In einer einstweiligen Verfügung des
Landgerichts Berlin vom 31. August (Az.: 27 O 658/10) ist das Unternehmen
aufgefordert worden, nicht länger Falschinformationen über den Kasseler
Immobilienhändler Immovation AG und seinen Finanzvorstand Lars Bergmann zu
verbreiten. „Gomopa hat seinen Firmensitz bewusst in New York, weil die Firma
dort presserechtlich nicht belangt werden kann“, sagte ein Kenner des
Unternehmens der F.A.Z.”
siehe Beweis:
Klaus Maurischt wurde wegen dem Kapitalanlagebetrug an seinem eigenen
"GoMoPa"-Anleger rechtskräftig als Betrüger verurteilt:
siehe Beweis:
http://gomopa2009.wordpress.com/2009/04/18/das-urteil-gegen-den-gomopa-kriminellen-inhaber-klaus-maurischat/
weitere Informationen zu Maurischat und seinen mutmasslichen Komplizen
Gerd-Wilhelm Bennewirtz, Peter Ehlers, Volker Schmidt-Jennrich etc.. finden Sie
in der Presselounge der SJB-Opfer.
siehe Beweise:
http://sjb-fonds-opfer.com/?page_id=11764
Der mehrfach vorbestrafte Serienbetrüger Klaus Maurischat („GoMoPa“) hat ein
eigenes Portal nur für Kinder und deren „Sexualerziehung“. Dies haben der
Informationsdienst Tip-Talk und die Anleger-Opfer von http://www.sjb-fonds-opfer.com
enthüllt: http://www.gomopa4kids.net.
Hier werden User von dem mehrfach vorbestraften Betrüger (AZ: 28 Ls 85/05)
darüber aufgeklärt, was es mit der „Selbstbefriedigung“ und anderen
Sexualpraktiken angeblich auf sich hat: „Wahr oder falsch: Gerüchte über
Selbstbefriedigung! „
TipTalk kommentiert: „Wenn Sie Ihre Kinder nicht selbst aufklären können oder
wollen, sollten Sie das getrost Gomopa überlassen.
Über Selbstbefriedigung erzählt man sich immer noch verrückte Geschichten. Wir
sagen dir was stimmt und was voll
gelogen ist!
http://www.gomopa4kids.net kümmert sich gern um Ihren Nachwuchs.
http://www.gomopa4kids.net/Forum/liebe-sex-und-beziehungen/wahr-oder-falsch-geruechte-ueber-selbstbefriedigung-
p232.html#post232.“ (Inzwischen gelöscht)
siehe Beweis unter
http://sjb-fonds-opfer.com/?p=11490
Unsere Presseanfrage zu dem heiklen Thema beantworte der vorbestrafte Betrüger
erst gar nicht, sondern schickte einen Herren „Siegfried Siewert“ vor, der
versuchte mit Droh-Telefonaten und Droh-E-Mails bei uns und unseren Informanten
das Erscheinen der brisanten Informationen zu verhindern.
Siehe Beweise unter
http://sjb-fonds-opfer.com/?p=11616
und
http://sjb-fonds-opfer.com/?p=11490
Pikant dabei: „Siegfied Siewert“ ist wie viele „GoMoPa“-Kenner wissen, ein
selbstgewähltes Pseudonym für Klaus Maurischat.
Und: Die „GoMoPa“-Kinder-Webseite wird genau da gehostet, wo auch Maurischats
GoMoPa-Webpage sowie zahlreiche ihm zugerechnete Cyberstalking-Erpresserseiten
gehostet werden (siehe die Verbindungsdaten im nachfolgenden Text).
Erstaunlich ist auch, das Maurischat seinen zahlreichen Cyberstalking-Opfern
immer wieder Sexualdelikte mit Kindern vorgeworfen hat – an diesen anoynmen
Vorwürfen war natürlich in keinem Fall irgendetwas wahr.
Nachdem seine gegen unseren Co-Herausgeber Magister Bernd Pulch und zahlreiche
anderen Opfer gerichteten Verleumdungsseiten nicht mehr von Google indexiert
werden, da sie klarerweise gegen geltendes Recht verstossen und seine Denial of
Service-Atatcken gegen uns gescheitert sind, bleiben Maurischat jetzt nur noch
telefonische Drohanrufe und Verleumdungen auf seiner eigenen Webseite.
Magister Bernd Pulch: „Was für ein glänzender Un-Journalist der vorbestrafte
Maurischat ist, kann man schon daran erkennen, dass er es bis heute nicht
geschafft hat, meine akademische Ausbildung und den Erwerb meines Titels
Magisters zu verifizieren. Das kann jedoch schon jeder Praktikant
nachvollziehen. Komplexere Sachverhalte übersteigen mit Sicherheit das
Begriffsvermögen des vorbestraften Betrügers.
Im Übrigen stehen wir für weitere Rückfragen jederzeit in unserem Londoner Büro
zur Verfügung oder auch per E-Mail zur Verfügung.“
Hintergrund:
Die Verbindungsdaten der Kinder-Webseite:
siehe Beweise für alle Webseiten unter
http://www.realwebsiteworth.com/gomopa4kids.net
und unter
HINZU KOMMT DIE VERWICKLUNG IN DEN TOD VON HEINZ GERLACH etc< ppp
Become a Patron!
True Information is the most valuable resource and we ask you to give back.
A personal advice to you, STASI-MAURISCHAT in general terms:
Somebody who has been detected to be a murderer should try to get mercy and should not act wild at all.
Ein persönlicher Rat an STASI-MAURISCHAT in general terms:
Jemand, der wegen Mordes aufgeflogen ist, sollte lieber auf mildernde Umstände hoffen, als den starken Mann zu markieren, Stasi-Maurischat
Sincerely yours
Magister Bernd Pulch
Become a Patron!
True Information is the most valuable resource and we ask you to give back.
Dear Readers,
some fakes by the serial criminals of “GoMoPa” – former Stasi Agents were distributed by their unknown henchmen.
The original is here:
http://othergomopa.blogspot.com/ and
Original hier: http://klaus-dieter-maurischat.blogspot.com/2009/01/klaus-dieter-maurischat-in-haft.html
Gefälschte Stellungnahme mutmasslich von “NACHRICHTENDIENST” “GoMoPa” Original hier: http://klaus-dieter-maurischat.blogspot.com/2009/01/klaus-dieter-maurischat-in-haft.html
and of course here:
Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. unveils new criminal phenomena in network I. In recently appeared on the net more often at the same time a new a very worrying phenomenon of criminal nature. Professional criminals groups in the network are taking part, to extortion, fraud, Erschwindeln relating to certain specifically selected companies and businesses are capable of. These criminals developed new methods and means, simply and in a short time to bereichern.Strategien and manifestations, which underlie this process are fairly simple. A criminal is looking to “carefully” on the Internet specific companies and corporations (victims of crime) and informed them in the next step, that of the business activities of such companies and corporations in the near future – first on the Internet then in other available mass media – numerous and very unfavorable information appears. At the same time, the criminals beat their future victims an effective means of reducing unnecessary difficulties and problems to escape the loss of good name and image of the company and corporate sector. These offenders are aware of that reputation, name and appearance of each company is a value in itself. It was therefore a value of what each company is prepared to pay any price. But the reason for difficulties and problems arising from the loss of good name and reputation result. The criminals and their victims are already aware that this loss is devastating consequences might have been the closing down of a particular business can enforce. It takes both to No as well as at large companies regard. The company is concerned that in virtually every industry in each country and cross-border activities sind.Das criminal procedure in the form of a blackmail on money, a fraud is becoming rapidly and globally, ie led cross-border and internationally. Among the victims of extortion, fraud is now looking both at home (domestic) and international corporations, the major emphasis on conservation, keeping and maintaining their reputation in the business according to their credibility lay. The criminals in the network have understood that maintaining an unassailable reputation and name of a company the unique ability to provide fast and easy enrichment forms. The above-mentioned criminal procedure is difficult to track because it is international in nature, and by overlapping or even nonexistent (fictional) professional and judicial persons in various countries and operated company wird.Diese offenders in the network publish it and disseminate false information about your victims on remote servers, which are not uncommon in many exotic countries. There are those countries in which serious gaps in the legal system, investigative and prosecution procedures are visible. As an example, at this point mention India werden. Mit criminals working in the network grid portals known leader of blogs with your seat-consciously or unconsciously, even in highly developed countries. For example, at this point, countries such as Germany, Austria, Switzerland, the United States, Britain, Spain or Portugal are mentioned. The below listed criminals were able to act unpunished today. As a symptom of such action appears here the activity and “effectiveness” of the company GOMOPA, which is on countries such as Germany, Switzerland, Austria, the United States, Britain, Spain and India. A good example of such an action is Mr. Klaus Mauri Chat – the leader and “brain” of the company GOMOPA with many already in force and criminal judgments “on his account”, which in this way for years and funded its maintenance in the industry almost unlimited activity. This status will change dramatically, however, including far and wide thanks to discontinued operations of the firm Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. who would oppose such offenses addressed in the network. Other companies and corporations, in which the crime network and outside of this medium have fallen victim to contribute to combating such crimes bei.Die situation is changing, thanks to effective steps and the successful cooperation of the firm Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. with the international police Interpol, with the federal agency (FBI) in the U.S., the Federal Criminal Police in Germany, with Scotland Yard in Britain, as well as with the Russian secret service FSB.Die Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. – Together with other companies and cooperations, the victim of criminal activities of the network of crime have fallen – has undeniably already started to yield results. The fact that in recent weeks (November 2008) on the territory of the Federal Republic of Germany of the above-mentioned leaders and “brain” of the company GOMOPA, Mr Klaus Maurishat was arrested should not be ignored. The Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. information available results clearly show that the next arrests of persons participating in this process in such countries as: Austria, Switzerland, Russia, Ukraine, Poland, Spain, Mexico, Portugal, Brazil, the USA, Canada, UK, Ireland , Australia, New Zealand and made in a.. The ultimate goal of Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. and the other victims of crime in the network is to provide all participants in this criminal procedure before the competent court to lead. All professional and judicial persons, regardless of the seat and out of the business, which the above-described criminal action (fraud, extortion) to have fallen victim can of Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. led company to join the goal set at all at this point the procedure described those associated in the public and the economic life out. II blacklist blackmail and with international fraudsters and their methods (opus operandi) in the following countries: 1 The Federal Republic Deutschland2. Dubai 3rd Russia 1st The Federal Republic of Germany GmbH GOMOPA, Goldman Morgenstern & Partners LLC., Goldman Morgenstern & Partners Consulting LLC, Wottle collection. In these firms are quite active following persons: – Klaus Mauri Chat ( “Father” and “brain” of the criminal organization responsible for countless final judgments have been achieved (arrested in Germany in November 2008) – Josef Rudolf Heckel ( “right hand “when Mr Klaus Mauri chat, denounced former banker who is excessive in many Bankschmuggeleien was involved.
(Today, persona non grata in the German banking industry); – Peter Reski (responsible for Finance, known for fraud, tax fraud and embezzlement, which is already behind the judgments are final) – Mark Vornkahl (responsible for organizational and administrative tasks in GOMOPA, a former police officer dismissed because of numerous expectations in the service, already has a few final judgments “on his account”); – Claus i Ulrike Wottle (married couple, for the so-called “unconventional” enforcement of the debt for the benefit GOMOPA. This execution was imposing, with extortion violence based on both real and fictitious debts references? How does the system of GOMOPADie above-mentioned persons in Brief, as well as with the service GOMOPA cooperating, so-called “experts GOMOPA” Bloggers and all other professional and legal persons choose from all possible sources of information about large, rich companies and corporations coming in various domestic and international sectors of the economy. GOMOPA The service is particularly keen that those aussucht, the “in itself visible.” Those companies corporations and, therefore, against the relatively easy and without much effort himself, inconsistencies, etc. can be done in terms of the even crimes such as cheating and Erschwindeln Others can easily perform. It is well known that every company especially good at their presence and her name is inviolable. Each company will do everything according to their good presence also retain its credibility to be. But if the victim of GOMOPA and his “partner” and a large range of businesses, so it is possible to call such companies a quick, easy, and even considerably enriched. It appears at this point the question: Which clever criminals in the network and outside the network to me is success, it does not wish to benefit? The criminals in the network know that without business credibility there is no confidence that any business is essential. GOMOPA and all are cooperating with the security of all possible methods and measures mastered how to credibility and confidence of a company, a company, corporation (crime victims) in question. This moves just the attention of the user, so that the homepage of the GOMOPA http://www.gomopa.net in search engines like Google, Yahoo is easy to find. This, in turn, means nothing other than additional profits for the service GOMOPA because of its activity around a media discourse created wird. At first glance commonplace and easy victims of extortion, for example, can a public governmental body, which, based on the credibility of public works, such as a bank or a foreign bank financial institution. So it was with the foreign banks, international financial institution Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. the case. A simple and easy victims of illicit profits and material may include insurance companies, where – as it is from our search results, much to the criminal activities of the GOMOPA especially in the area of the Federal Republic of Germany, Switzerland and Austria was due. Among the known and identifiable victims is certainly German, Austrian and Swiss banks, insurance companies such as Allianz of Germany, German and Austrian companies such as HDI and DKV visible. This is what the service GOMOPA trust and what with the cooperating services, blogs nowadays practice is the so-called cyber-stalking, which rapidly spread in the network. The method is criminal at this point and others in the threat that the business of an enterprise (Ofer blackmail, threats and forcible ) fictitious, even non-existent information (lies, rumors, stories, statements, insults) on the net first then in other mass media. This is only used to a potential victim to move a considerable sum of money for the so-called “peace “the blackmailer available. The” quiet “here means the promise of access lock with respect to the fictitious publication of any information on the net and in all other mass media, the victims of extortion in extremely negative light showing. Such threats are, as already above the goal of companies – potential victims of cyber-stalking to do likewise, that they themselves “buy.” In short, GOMOPA and his peers, and cooperating with those services, and blogs, create a “virtual reality”, or otherwise said publishing fictitious information on potential victims of a crime. firms and corporations, against which threats and extortion by GOMOPA are not due, ie those who for so-called “peace” does not want to pay, to be victims of serious lies, insults, and Insinuationen other criminal misappropriations, the appearance and presence of a firm with certainty. One is a target of GOMOPA, namely as fast and as easy as it goes, money abzukassieren, and if a company refuses, and the “peace” do not buy wishes, it is unexpectedly and quickly become an object of extortion and defamation on the net. At this point the following question arises: How is it possible that the leader of the firm GOMOPA, Mr Klaus Maurischat, only in the Federal Republic of Germany on his account “23 court rulings, has for many years as an honest citizen to create, while other persons, firms, corporations criminal acts, offenses memorize, in addition to substantial sums of money could earn? This complex process can only be explained as follows: GOMOPA creates his appearance, his presence in the eyes of public opinion as an honest subject, against which pathological phenomena in the public and economic life einschreitet. GOMOPA and his partner (services, blogs) present themselves as followers of any Verbrechensart that promise so the fight against criminals in each virtual network ( especially against any cheaters, blackmailers). GOMOPA used in this respect a kind of “Merketingsvorhang” as a method of seduction, a result which is his true “face” and his true intentions than that of a fraudster and blackmail on money can hide. The true intentions of the GOMOPA, of working together GOMOPA Services and blogs were until today no doubt with success before the public opinion will remain hidden, especially thanks to the so-called “smoke curtain”, which reflects the fact that man himself as a “winner” of any abuse and any pathological appearance of the public and economic life in Aland German, Austria, Switzerland, the United States, Britain, Russia, Spain created. Next appears the GOMOPA forward by the person on which companies and corporations – the future victims of the crime that is – against the possibility of the release of extremely poor and the company concerned in a negative light visual information on the Internet and other mass media warns. The person from whom the speech is also informed that they are successful against such a procedure for a “fee” can be used. The GOMOPA is at this point up to the extortion of money for so-called “peace” to the company and corporation (the victim of a crime) around. Most of the companies concerned to such threats did not respond, because it’s everyday life and their agenda. It finally barely missing on the web of blackmail and outside of the medium. Normally so seldom so-called “understanding”, while on the one hand, the crime victim, on the other hand, the GOMOPA occurs. It is understandable that the price for such an “understanding” means the provision of the requested funds would GOMOPA. The financial blackmail in this stage is rarely enforced. The situation changes little, however, if the firms and corporations (crime victims) find that the threat was fulfilled. In Brief will appear on the homepage http://www.gomopa.net numerous newspaper articles, reports and bogus pseudo market analysis, both by GOMOPA as well as so-called “independent experts” and the company will be represented, with formal or fictitious GOMOPA together. Information published here, correspond to the contents of a threat and make the operations of firms and corporations in an extremely negative light dar. There is no doubt that such actions and methods only to harm the good name and good presence of these firms and corporations prerogatives. The activity of GOMOPA is certainly not exhausted. GOMOPA disseminated (published accommodates) the above information in the network by the credible, and popular opinion-operated services. Moreover, GOMOPA threatens the companies and corporations (its victims), that “from the finger-drawn” information not only on the network, but also on television and on radio and in the press landscape erscheinen.Wie the experience and expertise of the former Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. show that the services are usually not aware that they are for the purpose of a criminal action by the GOMOPA used. They agree with the corresponding fictitious publications, reports and analysis on what specifically GOMOPA through and through “independent” experts are prepared. It also states that the services, and blogs such cooperation with the GOMOPA approval, although they know that the information transmitted by GOMOPA are fictitious and the credibility of companies and corporations affect. They take so aware of the criminal procedure part. The explanation of this situation is quite simple. GOMOPA pays namely the services, and blogs related remuneration that the publication of false information on the companies and corporations (crime victims) agree. Some services, and blogs seem to know nothing about it to have that on their pages available information “fictitious” and “pulled out of the fingers are. Are you looking for in this way their conduct to justify, because they want the legal consequences of participating in the abuse of the good name and appearance of a company or corporation to escape. The activity system of GOMOPA of collaborating services and blogs was also the example of Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. tested. Beginning in October 2008 was one of the workers of Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. a message from an anonymous sender, in the near future – first on the Internet, then on television, radio and in the German press – information published by the functioning and activities of Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. in an extremely negative light show. The employee of Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. was then informed that these reports / news undoubtedly significantly the appearance and the reputation of the firm Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. affect. The place mentioned in this “conversation partner” has the workers of Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. informed that the possibility of the embarrassing situation to be avoided by Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. to the person shown by the account the sum of 100,000.00 EUR transfers. As later revealed, however, was Mr. Klaus Mauri Chat – this anonymous interlocutor – “brain” and “Leader of the GOMOPA”. The investigations have been employed by the Federal Judicial Police (tracking and identifying the body at the federal level) during the investigation for the payment of blackmail, fraud and threats because of what Mr Mauri chatting and his staff were practiced, and for participation by other (head of Internet services and moderators of blogs) on this process. These crimes have been committed to loss of many professional and judicial persons, including the Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. The victims of this crime in Germany, Austria, Switzerland, Spain, Portugal, Great Britain, the USA and Canada visible. At this moment appeared the following question: What was the reaction of Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. to the demands from GOMOPA? Corresponded to the response to the expectations of GOMOPA? Has the Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. the required sum of EUR 100,000.00 paid? Side of Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. There was absolutely no reaction to the extortion attempt by GOMOPA. At the end of August 2008 on the Service http://www.gompa.net numerous articles / reports published by the activities of Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. in a very negative light have represented. Once the information contained on http://www.gomopa.net detail and were fully analyzed, it is that they are not even the truth at one point and potential and existing customers of Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. in relation to the financial institution from this discontinued business activities is misleading. Following the criminal Handlugen of GOMOPA and its cooperating services, and blogs on the network, the Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. measurable and significant business losses. The Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. has primarily an important group of potential customers lost. But what it showed as important, the existing customers of Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. little away. Those customers have used our services and continue to use the still. In view of the existing collaboration with the Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.., Which will in turn be no objections. GOMOPA has such a course of events accurately predicted, which aims significant and measurable business by Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. losses were suffered. The course of events, the service GOMOPA certainly pleased. GOMOPA has to expect that the position of Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. declines and the financial institution, the required sum (100.000,00 EUR) provides. Over time, as the whole procedure in the network was becoming more popular, tried GOMOPA still four times to the Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. Contacts, each time by adjusting these criminal “Kompanie” has promised, although it every time his financial demands heraufsetzte. The last of the set of “company” against Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. ratio was even planned EUR 5,000,000.00 (in words: EURO fünfmilionen). The Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. could but before the ever-increasing demands from the Service GOMOPA claim. In October 2008 met the management of Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. Decision on the notification of the INTERPOL International Police and the appropriate law enforcement institutions of the FRG (the police and the prosecutor) about the existing situation. In the meantime, reported at the Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. numerous companies and corporations, and even professional person such as doctors, judges, priests, actors and other people from different countries of the world, the extortion of GOMOPA relented and the required amounts of money it had. These people already gave statements that they have done so, so they finally just “be in peace” and unnecessary problems, difficulties, and a reasonable conclusion hardly avoid them. The victims of this criminal action, the Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. using different amounts of money which were requested, informed. In one case, there were relatively small (a few thousand EURO), in another case it has to deliver significant amounts (around few million EURO). Additionally turned to Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. Companies which have not yet GOMOPA the “fee” on out and have already considered whether they should do or not. These firms anticipated by Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. a clear opinion as well as a practical professional advice on how to be in such a situation should behave and how they can avoid debt. The Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. has invariably victims of all crimes, which are at our company have made a cooperation proposed. The top task is to this cooperation, jointly determined and effective measures against GOMOPA against other services in the network, and against all Bloggers to meet in the here described with international criminal procedure GOMOPA leaders to participate. All these companies were known as the Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. proposed “crusade” against GOMOPA, his partner. At our request to notify all participating companies the INTERPOL International Police and their pursuit of domestic institutions, including the competent public prosecutor and the police authorities about the existing situation. In view of the fact that the criminal act of GOMOPA be extended over many states and that the number of the Federal Republic of Germany because the ads reimbursed by GOMOPA, Internet Services and Bloggers crimes, grew up fast – which no doubt influenced by a far-reaching impact of criminal of GOMOPA testifies – International Business, the Police INTERPOL Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. before that its representatives in Berlin with representatives from GOMOPA true to the “payment arrangements and transfer the sum of EUR 5,000,000.00 to discuss. This step meant a well thought-out and by the Federal Criminal Police organized the event to carry out aimed at the arrest of international criminals GOMOPA acting was. The coordinated steps and measures of Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. Damaged and others, led by the International Economic Police INTERPOL, the Federal Criminal Police Office and the Prosecutor of the Federal Republic of Germany for education, training and implementation of the above-described case contributed. In November 2008, the event in Berlin prepared for the apprehension and arrest of the representative of the GOMOPA, after the arrest of Mr. Klaus Mauri chat – as the main leaders and leaders of international criminal group GOMOPA recalled. The arrest and notified the Federal Criminal Police showed both the current whereabouts of Mr. Klaus Mauri chat. “Brain” and the founder of this international criminal group GOMOPA, Mr Klaus Mauri chat on the same day was also arrested and imprisoned on time, will soon put in charge state, the responsibility for their own crimes and those of the forum, before a competent GOMOPA Federal wear. The Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. undertook all possible steps to ensure that Mr. Klaus Mauri chatting on the dock of the competent court of the United Kingdom of Great Britain appears. Among the damaged work and justice people from United Kingdom, along with the Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. There are many victims of GOMOPA: The beginning of the arrests with such a scale means for the German judiciary and a major breakthrough point. It is worth noting that the prosecution bodies of the Federal Republic, up to this stage of the long-standing criminal activity of Mr. Klaus Mauri chatting and his staff were powerless. Prolonged impunity of the criminal actions of Mr. Klaus Mauri chat, for years the “first violin” in GOMOPA played, is to end gegangen.An this point another question arises: how is it so go on? The arrest of Mr. Klaus chat Mauri is a critical moment, in other words a “turn around 180 degrees” for him personally. But it also means the beginning of the end “for its employees, for Internet Services, Bloggers, with GOMOPA so happy and had worked together without contradiction. There is no doubt that the cause of Mr Klaus Mauri chat at the top of the “iceberg” is. The above-mentioned turning point on this issue will be further arrests and detentions of members GOMOPA bring with them, and all persons from all areas involved in this transnational criminal actions have taken part. For information (reports by the end of December 2008), which of Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. available, the result that the next arrests currently prepared to be associated with the Services GOMOPA cooperating persons. This is to people outside Germany – from where Mr Klaus Mauri chat coming – refer. The details may be at this point in terms of legal and course of the prosecution bodies of the BRG and the Interpol-led investigation can not be betrayed. The Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. currently can only illustrate information from the investigation led the public to the criminal liability not to have this moment wird.In so intense preparations for the arrest of a number of persons outside the Federal Republic of Germany. This applies particularly to countries such as the following: – Russia-Ukraine – Poland – Spain – Mexico – Portugal – Brazil – the United States of America – Canada – UK – Ireland – Australia – New Zealand – India. All professional and judicial persons, regardless of the country in which they accompany the Office, or its citizens, and until now, consciously or unconsciously with the Forum GOMOPA together, or continue to work together to arouse the suspicion of the INTERPOL International Police. This works with the police criminal investigation department in each country, to the above persons first identify and then to legally pursue them. Information about this topic, as well as on the beginning and end of the activity of the GOMOPA can be at the following addresses on the Web at: http://gomopaabzocker.wordpress.com/ – http://www.nepper-schlepper-bauernfaenger.com – http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qNpzAu-QMuE – http://www.korte.de/alexander/2006/01/gomopa-finanforum-kritik.html- http://evelux.de/gomopa-sam-240/- http://blog.deobald.org/archive/2007/07/01/betrugsvorwurf-gomopa-spam/ 2. Dubai KLP Group Emirates – United Arab Emirates. As head of the company is Mr Martin Kraeter, not only as the “brain” of the whole company, but also as a longstanding friend of Mr Klaus Mauri Chat (GOMOPA-wire) acts. This company wants to hide and not even officially exist, that they as a strategic partner of the GOMOPA in the area of the Middle East, according to the territory of the Persian coast operates. Official activities of the company KLP Group Emirates includes among others the following areas: financial advisory services from the offshore area (Management Services – Facilitators – OffshoreConsultants, International Tax & Legal Consultants – Fiduciaries). In the sphere of activities of the Company will include the creation of companies and enterprises in the so-called “tax havens” to the tax liability to the company activity entfliehen.Inoffizielle KLP Group Emirates includes cooperation with the Service GOMOPA in the field of “Gelwäsche”. The monies are a result of criminal activity by GOMOPA generated by advanced professional and judicial persons soon throughout the world and legalized. The illegality based on the activity of the company KLP Group Emirates, as well as the cooperation with the Services GOMOPA attracted attention even when the prosecution organs of the United Kingdom of Great Britain, especially in Scotland Yard, which on this issue an intensive investigation has begun, which is in the ” development phase is located. It must be noted that all professional and judicial persons, but especially the clients of the company KLP Group Emirates, with the company KLP Group Emirates have cooperated in the past and still do, under the “Lupp” of Scotland Yard to be .3. Russlanda) The Company E-XECUTIVE by the Lord led Novosartow Vilen. On the homepage of the Company contained information comes directly from the company GOMOPA. The company e XECUTIVE leads the close cooperation not only with GOMOPA, but also with another on the Russian territory under the name of OOO UK broker functioning company. The company e XECUTIVE in connection with the company OOO UK broker is a member of a criminal group led by GOMOPA. The company e XECUTIVE GOMOPA representing interests in Russia and Central-Eastern Europe. Unofficially, the company employs E XECUTIVE-especially with the search for potential “victims” of the Erschwindelns, blackmail and forcing the funds for GOMOPA companies and corporations from the territory of Russia, Ukraine, and from all countries in Central Eastern Europe. Officially, the company e XECUTIVE one to the forum GOMOPA similar industrial activity. b) OOO “UK broker.” Head of the firm is Mr. Pavel Kokarev. This company is not concealed, that they are consistent with the Forum GOMOPA cooperates. The company OOO UK broker represents GOMOPA in Central Eastern Europe, including Russia. You shall be officially transferred to this area the GOMOPA similar activity, but unofficially it is to search for potential “victims” of racketeering, fraud and Erschwindelns for GOMOPA employed. The company has remained until now spared from any punishment, it could with “eternal impunity” because of a poorly developed, corrupt legal system in Russia expected. The situation may change after Mr. Klaus Mauri Chat arrested in Berlin and was arrested. This constant offenders, the “on his account” a set of legally enforceable judgments has, until now his freedom has unlimited recover, the do not know quite what it means to be arrested, begins gradually, according to our available information to finally “to bear witness.” This is understandable when one considers the threat of a penalty he considered. This delinquent shows growing interest in cooperation with the German tracking and identifying bodies. So there is a chance that other people he unveiled to the public by providing for reduction of prison sentence counts. It is also the only question of time INTERPOL, in cooperation with the Russian Service (FSB) of the Company OOO UK broker “at the door knocking”, which by Mr. Pavle Kokarev and represented. The company OOO UK broker has a virtual office in REGUS building in Moscow, is not even a person, forming a typical one-person company, which all business “crimes” may be the name of it, with no civil liability to pay. The Lord Pavel Kokarev seems to have forgotten or do not have sufficient knowledge about its possible responsibility fier to participate in the international crimes under the direction of Gomopa.
Sincerely yours
Magister Bernd Pulch
Become a Patron!
True Information is the most valuable resource and we ask you to give back.
On our request the German criminal police (Kriminalpolizei) has opened new cases against the notorious “GoMoPa” organisation which already fled in the underground. Insiders say they have killed German journalist and watchdog Heinz Gerlach and their criminal record is bigger than the Encyclopedia – Britannica
The case is also directed against Google, Germany, whilst supporting criminal action of “GoMoPa” for years and therefore give them the chance to blackmail successfull businessman. This case is therefore an example and will be followed by many others as far as we can project. Furthermore we will bring the case to the attention of the German lawyers community which will not tolerate such misconduct by Googles German legal representative Dr. Arndt Haller and we will bring the case to the attention of Google Inc in Mountain View, USA, and the American ministry of Justice to stop the Cyberstalkers once and for all.
Besides that many legal institutions, individuals and firms have already contacted us to help to clarify the death of Mr. Heinz Gerlach and to prosecute his murderers and their backers.
The case number is ST/0148943/2011
In a series of interviews beginning 11 months before the sudden death of German watchdog Heinz Gerlach Berlin lawyer Joschen Resch unveilved secrets of Gerlach, insiders say. Secret documents from Mr Gerlachs computer were published on two dubious hostile German websites. Both have a lot of similarities in their internet registration. One the notorious “GoMoPa” website belongs to a n Eastern German organization which calls itself “
Numerous attempts have been made to stop our research and the publication of the stories by “GoMoPa” members in camouflage thus confirming the truth and the substance of it in a superior way.
Only two articles let the German audience believe that the famous journalist and watchdog Heinz Gerlach died on natural courses by blood pollution. The first one, published only hours after the death of Mr Heinz Gerlach by the notorious “GoMoPa” (see article below) and a second 3 days later by a small German local newspaper, Weserbergland Nachrichten.
Many people including the hostile Gerlach website “Akte Heinz Gerlach” doubted that this man who had so many enemies and friends would die of natural causes without any previous warning. Rumours occured that Mr. Gerlach’s doctor doubted natural courses at all. After many critical voices discussed the issue a small website of a small German local newspaper – which never before had reported about Mr. Heinz Gerlach and which is not even in the region of Mr Gerlachs home – published that Mr Gerlach died of blood pollution. Weserbergland-Nachrichten published a long article about the deadly consequences of blood pollution and did not even name the source of such an important statement. It claimed only that somebody of Gerlachs inner circle had said this. It is a proven fact that after the collpase of the Eastern German Communist Regime many former Communist propaganda agents went to regional newspapers – often in Western Germany like Günther Schabowski did the man who opened the “Mauer”.
The theatre stage was set: One day later the hostile Gerlach website “Akte Heinz Gerlach” took the agenda publishing that Mr Gerlach had died for natural causes without any further research at all.
This was done by a website which for months and months and months reported everything about Mr. Gerlach.
Furthermore a research proves that the technical details regarding the website hosting of this hostile website “Akte Heinz Gerlach” proves that there are common details with the hosting of “GoMoPa” and their affiliates as proven by the SJB-GoMoPa-victims (see http://www.sjb-fonds-opfer.com)
Insiders believe that the murderers of Mr. Heinz Gerlach are former members of the Eastern German Terror Organisation “Stasi” with dioxins. They also believe that “GoMoPa” was part of the plot. At “GoMoPa”’ a person named Siegfried Siewers was officialy responsible for the press but never appeared in public. “GoMoPa”-victims say that this name was a cameo for “GoMoPa” frontrunner Klaus Maurischat who is controlled by the Stasi Top Agent Ehrenfried Stelzner, Berlin.
Siegfried Sievers, a former Stasi member is responsible for the pollution of millions Germanys for many years with dioxins. This was unveiled at 5th of January 2011 by German prosecutors.
The victims say that Maurischat (probably also a Stasi cameo) and Sievers were in contact as Sievers acted as Stasi Agent and was in fact already a specialist in dioxins under the Communist Terror Regime in Eastern Germany.
Furthermore the Stasi Top Agent Ehrenfried Stelzer disguised as Professor for Criminal studies during the Communist Regime at the Eastern Berlin Humboldt University.
Background:
The man behind the Berlin lawyer Jochen Resch and his activities is Ehrenfried Stelzer, former Stasi Top officer in Berlin and “Professor for Criminal Studies” at the Eastern Berlin Humboldt University during the Communist regime, the SJB-GoMoPa-victims say (www.sjb-fonds-opfer.com) is responsable for the killing of German watchdog and journalist Heinz Gerlach.
These informations stem from various sources who were close to the criminal organization of GoMoPa in the last years. The SJB-GoMoPa say that the well-known German watchdog and journalist Heinz Gerlach was killed by former Stasi members with dioxins. Polychlorinated dibenzodioxins (PCDDs), or simply dioxins, are a group of organic polyhalogenated compounds that are significant because they act as environmental pollutants. They are commonly referred to as dioxins for simplicity in scientific publications because every PCDD molecule contains a dioxin skeletal structure. Typically, the p-dioxin skeleton is at the core of a PCDD molecule, giving the molecule a dibenzo-p-dioxin ring system. Members of the PCDD family have been shown to bioaccumulate in humans and wildlife due to their lipophilic properties, and are known teratogens, mutagens, and confirmed (avered) human carcinogens. They are organic compounds.
Dioxins build up primarily in fatty tissues over time (bioaccumulate), so even small exposures may eventually reach dangerous levels. In 1994, the US EPA reported that dioxins are a probable carcinogen, but noted that non-cancer effects (reproduction and sexual development, immune system) may pose an even greater threat to human health. TCDD, the most toxic of the dibenzodioxins, is classified as a Group 1 carcinogen by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC).
In 2004, a notable individual case of dioxin poisoning, Ukrainian politician Viktor Yushchenko was exposed to the second-largest measured dose of dioxins, according to the reports of the physicians responsible for diagnosing him. This is the first known case of a single high dose of TCDD dioxin poisoning, and was diagnosed only after a toxicologist recognized the symptoms of chloracne while viewing television news coverage of his condition.
German dioxin scandal: In January 2011 about 4700 German farms were banned from making deliveries after tests at the Harles und Jentzsch plant in the state of Schleswig-Holstein showed high levels of dioxin. Again this incident appears to involve PCBs and not PCDDs at all. Dioxin were found in animal feed and eggs in many farms. The person who is responsible for this, Siegfried Sievert is also a former Stasi Agent. At “GoMoPa” the notorious Eastern-Berlin press agency (see article below) one of the henchmen acted under the name of “Siegfried Siewert”.
Further evidence for the killing of Mr.Heinz Gerlach is provided by the SJB-GoMoPa-victims by analyzing the dubious role of former Stasi-Top-agent Ehrenfried Stelzer, also a former “Professor for Crime Studies” under the Communist regime in Eastern Germany and the dubious role of “detective” Medard Fuchsgruber. Both are closely tied to the dubious “GoMoPa” and Berlin lawyer Jochen Resch.
According to the SJB-GoMoPa-victims is Berlin lawyer Jochen Resch the mastermind of the criminal organization “GoMoPa2. The victims state that they have a source inside “GoMoPa” who helped them discover the shocking truth. The so-called “Deep Throat from Berlin” has information that Resch had the idea to found the criminal organization “GoMoPa” and use non-existing Jewish lawyers named Goldman, Morgenstern & Partner as camouflage. Their “office” in Madison Avenue, New York, is a mailbox. This is witnessed by a German Ex-Patriot, a lawyer, whose father, Heinz Gerlach, died under strange circumstances.
Resch seems to use “GoMoPa” as an instrument to blackmail parts of the German Property and Investment segment.
Become a Patron!
True Information is the most valuable resource and we ask you to give back.
A German Source says: Inform yourself about Berlin Lawyer Jochen Resch and whether the so-called “institutions to protect the investors” are a scam….
And which rolle plays the so-called “NACHRICHTENDIENST” “GoMoPa” ?
Überprüfen Sie selbst die allgemein zugänglichen Informationen die hier zusammengestellt sind und machen sich selbst ein Bild über
1. Die Rechtsanwaltskanzlei Resch und Kollegen aus Berlin und ihren Gründer Rechtsanwalt Jochen Resch
2. Dem Deutschen Institut für Anlegerschutz e.V., kurz DIAS e.V. und ihren Vorständen sowie ihrem Gründer Rechtsanwalt Jochen Resch, der den Verein in den Kanzleiräumen der Rechtsanwaltskanzlei Resch und Kollegen gründete
3. Die Schutzgemeinschaft für geschädige Kapitalanleger e.V. und ihrem ehemaligen Vorstand Rechtsanwalt Jochen Resch sowie dem nachfolgenden Vorstand mit Stasivergangenheit.
Die Rechtsanwaltskanzlei Resch und ihr Gründer Rechtsanwalt Jochen Resch sind in den uns vorliegenden Dokumenten oben stehender Vereine oder “Verbraucherschutzinstitutionen” als Gründer, Initiator und Geldgeber, genannt.
Vor diesem Hintergrund haben sich bereits namhafte Journalisten die Frage gestellt:
“Dienen diese Institutionen, die in der Aussenwahrnehmung als unabhängig und verbrauchernah gelten, als triviales Mandantenfang-Instrumentarium?
Und welche Rolle spielt dabei der selbsternannte “NACHRICHTENDIENST” “GoMoPa” ?
Become a Patron!
True Information is the most valuable resource and we ask you to give back.
A German Source says: Inform yourself about Berlin Lawyer Jochen Resch and whether the so-called “institutions to protect the investors” are a scam….
And which rolle plays the so-called “NACHRICHTENDIENST” “GoMoPa” ?
Überprüfen Sie selbst die allgemein zugänglichen Informationen die hier zusammengestellt sind und machen sich selbst ein Bild über
1. Die Rechtsanwaltskanzlei Resch und Kollegen aus Berlin und ihren Gründer Rechtsanwalt Jochen Resch
2. Dem Deutschen Institut für Anlegerschutz e.V., kurz DIAS e.V. und ihren Vorständen sowie ihrem Gründer Rechtsanwalt Jochen Resch, der den Verein in den Kanzleiräumen der Rechtsanwaltskanzlei Resch und Kollegen gründete
3. Die Schutzgemeinschaft für geschädige Kapitalanleger e.V. und ihrem ehemaligen Vorstand Rechtsanwalt Jochen Resch sowie dem nachfolgenden Vorstand mit Stasivergangenheit.
Die Rechtsanwaltskanzlei Resch und ihr Gründer Rechtsanwalt Jochen Resch sind in den uns vorliegenden Dokumenten oben stehender Vereine oder “Verbraucherschutzinstitutionen” als Gründer, Initiator und Geldgeber, genannt.
Vor diesem Hintergrund haben sich bereits namhafte Journalisten die Frage gestellt:
“Dienen diese Institutionen, die in der Aussenwahrnehmung als unabhängig und verbrauchernah gelten, als triviales Mandantenfang-Instrumentarium?
Und welche Rolle spielt dabei der selbsternannte “NACHRICHTENDIENST” “GoMoPa” ?
Become a Patron!
True Information is the most valuable resource and we ask you to give back.
Dear readers,
on our request the German criminal police (Kriminalpolizei) has opened new cases against the notorious “GoMoPa” organisation which already fled in the underground. Insiders say they have killed German journalist and watchdog Heinz Gerlach and their criminal record is bigger than the
The case is also directed against Google, Germany, whilst supporting criminal action of “GoMoPa” for years and therefore give them the chance to blackmail successfull businessman. This case is therefore an example and will be followed by many others as far as we can project. Furthermore we will bring the case to the attention of the German lawyers community which will not tolerate such misconduct by Googles German legal representative Dr. Arndt Haller and we will bring the case to the attention of Google Inc in Mountain View, USA, and the American ministry of Justice to stop the Cyberstalkers once and for all.
Besides that many legal institutions, individuals and firms have already contacted us to help to clarify the death of Mr. Heinz Gerlach and to prosecute his murderers and their backers.
The case number is
ST/0148943/2011 My warmest regards Bernd Pulch
Become a Patron!
True Information is the most valuable resource and we ask you to give back.
A Russian television journalist who had reported from the turbulent North Caucasus region was found strangled in his Moscow apartment on Friday, prosecutors said.
Police said the body of Ilyas Shurpayev, 32, was found by firefighters when they arrived to put out a fire in his apartment. They said it appeared Shurpayev was strangled with a belt and his attackers set his apartment on fire before leaving.
Shurpayev had moved to Moscow from Dagestan, a crime-ridden southern province neighboring Chechnya where he worked for several years as a reporter with state-controlled Channel One television.
Shurpayev reported from many conflict zones in the former Soviet Union including Chechnya and Georgia’s breakaway regions of Abkhazia and South Ossetia.
A spokesman for the investigations committee of the Prosecutor-General’s office said several theories for Shurpayev’s murder were being checked, including those related to his personal life and his work.
“Apparently the journalist knew his murderer because he opened the door for him and let him in,” the spokesman said.
Russian media reported that a concierge in the apartment block where Shurpayev lived had seen the last person to visit him.
More than a dozen journalists have been slain in contract-style killings in Russia since 2000. Many journalists appear to have been targeted for beatings and killings because of their attempts to dig into allegations of corruption.
Shurpayev was not known as an investigative reporter.
Several hours before his death he posted an entry on his personal Internet blog, http://www.shurpaev.livejournal.com, saying he had been included in a black list of journalists barred from contributing to an unnamed Dagestani newspaper.
“Now I am a dissident! What nonsense!”, wrote Shurpayev, who said he had published only travel reports in the paper.
“I have not participated in the political life of my republic or even my district because I am too lazy and have no time,” he wrote.
Become a Patron!
True Information is the most valuable resource and we ask you to give back.

My name is Bernd Pulch, I have studied and acquired the title Master (Magister) according to the academic laws.
Link to my Master’s thesis
http://www.kepplinger.de/search/node/pulch
and
http://www.kepplinger.de/node/50
I am the heir of the family bible and can therefore represent our family based on this authority .
Our family has and had many members who work and worked successfully as entrepreneurs, secretaries of state, banker, lawyers, farmers, politicians and also journalists.
We will prevent that our family name is violated by convicted criminals, cybermurderers and Neo-Nazis as well as former Stasi-Agents like the notorious”GoMoPa” which leaders have and had numerous convictions and stayed many years in jail.
The cybermurderers were hired to fight for criminal fraudsters and to cover their fraud. Now they even copy our documents and the documents of Meridian Capital to confuse our readers.
This will not work.
In order to keep my family safe we will not publish any private data as we have evidence that these people did in fact execute a murder.
The German journalist Heinz Gerlach died several months ago under strange circumstances and we believe that it is very strange that this happened at the same time when he published his informations against “GoMoPa” and ther backers.
Furthermore there is significant evidence that the circumstances of his death and the methods of “GoMoPa” are connected to the former Eastern-German Communist Terror Organisation “Stasi” as many of their victims can witness.
See
http://sjb-fonds-opfer.com/?page_id=11764
I will therefore prosecute these criminals with no mercy until their very end..
.
Magister Bernd Pulch
London
Become a Patron!
True Information is the most valuable resource and we ask you to give back.
Become a Patron!
True Information is the most valuable resource and we ask you to give back.
Become a Patron!
True Information is the most valuable resource and we ask you to give back.
An aspiring filmmaker narrates a highly complex story to a producer. As his story unfolds, we will find out if the narrator is successful in getting his story approved.
Starring Suhas & Sridhar
Directed by Filmian
Produced by Anurag & Sharath
Music by Karthik Rodriguez
Cinematography by Shreekar Khajandar
Editing by Pavan Kalyan
Become a Patron!
True Information is the most valuable resource and we ask you to give back.
Great vision from a great leader
Unforgotten Heroes
Unforgotten Heroes
Unforgotten Heroes
My favourite Politician
You must be logged in to post a comment.