🤣🤣🤣Darth Vader vs Hitler. Epic Rap Battles of History🤣AI Parody🤣🤣inspired by Peter “Always Totally Absolutely 100000% Sane” Ehlers🤡🤡🤡

SUPPORT US AND Become a Patron! –

GET EXCLUSIVE GIFTS – TOP SECRET DOCUMENTS AND EXCLUSIVE EBOOKS

BY USING THE LINK BELOW


https://www.patreon.com/bePatron?u=54250700


(Paypal, Apple Pay, Venmo, Visa, Master Card, Discover, JCB, Diners Club, 3DS)

❌©BERNDPULCH.ORG – ABOVE TOP SECRET ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS – THE ONLY MEDIA WITH LICENSE TO SPY – websites: https://www.berndpulch.org
https://googlefirst.org

PLEASE SUPPORT OUR COMMON CAUSE AND HELP ME TO STAY ALIVE.

https://www.patreon.com/bePatron?u=54250700

https://www.patreon.com/berndpulch?utm_campaign=creatorshare_creator

https://www.buymeacoffee.com/berndpulch

CRYPTO WALLET for ShapeShift Wallet, KeepKey, Metamask, Portis, XDefi Wallet, TallyHo, Keplr and Wallet connect

0x271588b52701Ae34dA9D4B31716Df2669237AC7f

CRYPTO WALLET for Binance Smart Chain-, Ethereum-, Polygon-Networks

bmp

0xd3cce3e8e214f1979423032e5a8c57ed137c518b

for all crypto coins like

BITCOIN

ETHEREUM

TETHER

MATIC

USD COIN

BNB

WALL STREET MEMES

SHIBA INU

Follow the ONLY MEDIA with the LICENSE TO SPY ✌️@abovetopsecretxxl


To be absolutely anonymous please use Monero

Scan this code to send Monero to 41yKiG6eGbQiDxFRTKNepSiqaGaUV5VQWePHL5KYuzrxBWswyc5dtxZ43sk1SFWxDB4XrsDwVQBd3ZPNJRNdUCou3j22Coh.

True Information is the most valuable resource and we ask you kindly to give back.

🙏God Bless You!🙏

STUDY- U.S. Corporate Executives Received a Pay Raise of 27-40% Last Year

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=N6qG8DY8L88

 

 

Chief executive pay has roared back after two years of stagnation and decline. America’s top bosses enjoyed pay hikes of between 27 and 40% last year, according to the largest survey of US CEO pay. The dramatic bounceback comes as the latest government figures show wages for the majority of Americans are failing to keep up with inflation.

America’s highest paid executive took home more than $145.2m, and as stock prices recovered across the board, the median value of bosses’ profits on stock options rose 70% in 2010, from $950,400 to $1.3m. The news comes against the backdrop of an Occupy Wall Street movement that has focused Washington’s attention on the pay packages of America’s highest paid.

The Guardian’s exclusive first look at the CEO pay survey from corporate governance group GMI Ratings will further fuel debate about America’s widening income gap. The survey, the most extensive in the US, covered 2,647 companies, and offers a comprehensive assessment of all the data now available relating to 2010 pay.

Last year’s survey, covering 2009, found pay rates were broadly flat following a decline in wages the year before. Base salaries in 2009 showed a median increase of around 2%, and annual cash compensation increased just over 1.5%. The troubled stock markets took their toll, and added together CEO pay declined for the third year, though the decrease was marginal, less than three-tenths of a percent. The decline in the wider economy in 2007, 2008 and 2009 far outstripped the decline in CEO pay.

This year’s survey shows CEO pay packages have boomed: the top 10 earners took home more than $770m between them in 2010. As stock prices began to recover last year, the increase in CEO pay outstripped the rise in share value. The Russell 3000 measure of US stock prices was up by 16.93% in 2010, but CEO pay went up by 27.19% overall. For S&P 500 CEOs, the largest companies in the sample, total realised compensation – including perks and pensions and stock awards – increased by a median of 36.47%. Total pay at midcap companies, which are slightly smaller than the top firms, rose 40.2%.

 

DOWNLOAD ORIGINAL STUDY HERE

GMI_CEOPay2011_122011

SCRET-JFIIT Intelligence Surveillance and Reconnaissance (ISR) Systems Handbook

https://i0.wp.com/publicintelligence.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/JFIIT-Handbook.png

The purpose of the JFIIT Tactical Leaders Handbook (version 5) is to provide ground maneuver commanders, battle staffs, and soldiers with information regarding Joint Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance (ISR) and attack systems and how to leverage these combat multipliers during planning, preparation, and execution of military operations. JFIIT publishes a classified version of this document on the SIPRNET. The For Official Use Only (FOUO) Web version can be located at the NIPRNET address listed below.

https://i0.wp.com/publicintelligence.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/jfiit-1.png

https://i0.wp.com/publicintelligence.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/jfiit-2.png

https://i0.wp.com/publicintelligence.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/jfiit-3.png

https://i0.wp.com/publicintelligence.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/jfiit-4.png

https://i0.wp.com/publicintelligence.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/jfiit-5.png

DWONLOAD ORIGINAL DOCUMENT HERE

JFIIT-Handbook

TOP-SECRET from the FBI-Sheets, Sails, and Dormer Lights: The Case of the Pearl Harbor Spy


Pearl Harbor image with Bernard Kuehn inset

On February 21, 1942, just 76 days after the tragic attack on Pearl Harbor, Bernard Julius Otto Kuehn (pictured) was found guilty of spying and sentenced to be shot “by musketry” in Honolulu. What was a German national doing in Hawaii in the days leading up to the attack? What exactly did Kuehn do to warrant such a sentence? Here’s the story…

Bed sheets on clothes lines. Lights in dormer windows. Car headlights. A boat with a star on its sail.

Otto Kuehn had a complex system of signals all worked out. A light shining in the dormer window of his Oahu house from 9 to 10 p.m., for example, meant that U.S. aircraft carriers had sailed. A linen sheet hanging on a clothes line at his home on Lanikai beach between 10 and 11 a.m. meant the battle force had left the harbor. There were eight codes in all, used in varying combinations with the different signals.

In November 1941, Kuehn had offered to sell intelligence on U.S. warships in Hawaiian waters to the Japanese consulate in Hawaii. On December 2, he provided specific—and highly accurate—details on the fleet in writing. That same day, he gave the consulate the set of signals that could be picked up by nearby Japanese subs.

Kuehn—a member of the Nazi party—had arrived in Hawaii in 1935. By 1939, the Bureau was suspicious of him. He had questionable contacts with the Germans and Japanese. He’d lavishly entertained U.S. military officials and expressed interest in their work. He had two houses in Hawaii, lots of dough, but no real job. Investigations by the Bureau and the Army, though, never turned up definite proof of his spying.

Not until the fateful attack of December 7, 1941. Honolulu Special Agent in Charge Robert Shivers immediately began coordinating homeland security in Hawaii and tasked local police with guarding the Japanese consulate. They found its officials trying to burn reams of paper. These documents—once decoded—included a set of signals for U.S. fleet movements.

All fingers pointed at Kuehn. He had the dormer window, the sailboat, and big bank accounts. Kuehn was arrested the next day and confessed, though he denied ever sending coded signals. His sentence was commuted—50 years of hard labor instead of death “by musketry”—and he was later deported.

Today, his story reminds us how much damage espionage can do to our country. And why the FBI continues to rank counterintelligence as a top investigative priority.

TOP-SECRET – IMF Report on Switzerland Fiscal Transparency

https://publicintelligence.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/sm09164.png

I. INTRODUCTION

1. This report provides an assessment of the fiscal transparency practices of Switzerland against the requirements of the IMF Code of Good Practices on Fiscal Transparency (2007). The first part is a description of practices, prepared by IMF staff on the basis of discussions with the authorities and their responses to the fiscal transparency questionnaire, and drawing on other available information. The second part is an IMF staff commentary on fiscal transparency in Switzerland. The two appendices summarize the staff’s assessments, comment on the observance of good practices, and document the public availability of information.

2. This assessment focuses primarily on fiscal transparency at the central
government (confederation) level. Given the unique character of political economy and
fiscal federalism in Switzerland, and that less than a third of general government expenditure
or revenue is accounted for by the confederation, this does not give a complete picture.
Cantons are responsible for important areas of economic and social policy, and have a strong
influence on the composition and impact of public spending, and the overall stance of fiscal
policy. Further work would be needed to prepare a comprehensive assessment of fiscal
transparency and fiscal risk covering the whole of general government.

II. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF PRACTICE

A. Clarity of Roles and Responsibilities

Definition of government activities

3. General government is defined consistently with Government Finance Statistics
(GFS) principles and is well covered in the budget process. 1.1.1
General government is defined in accordance with the principles of the Government Finance
Statistics Manual (GFSM 2001) and comprises four main sectors (Box 1): The federal
government comprises seven departments and related offices, the federal chancellery, and
four special funds. The special funds cover (i) railway projects; (ii) infrastructure;
(iii) technical universities; and (iv) the alcohol board. There are 26 cantonal governments.
The cantons are sovereign states with considerable autonomy. There are 2715 communes,
which likewise have considerable autonomy. The four social security institutions cover
(i) old age and survivors protection schemes; (ii) the disability protection scheme;
(iii) income compensation allowances in case of mandatory service and maternity; and
(iv) unemployment insurance. These schemes operate essentially on a pay-as-you-go basis.

swiss

Box 2. The SNB’s Support for UBS as a Quasi-Fiscal Activity

The SNB has justified its recent support of UBS in relation to its role as lender-of-the-last resort. This explanation rests on three considerations, namely: that UBS is a systemically important institution; could provide sufficient collateral; and was solvent. On the last point, the SNB obtained advice from the Federal Banking Commission that UBS was solvent, enabling it to provide emergency support. It did so by funding 90 percent of the purchase price of distressed assets to the value of US$60 billion.1 These assets were valued by external assessors, and transferred to a Special Purpose Vehicle (SPV) under the SNB’s control. To reduce the risks of not fully recovering the funds of the SPV, the SNB has set up several safeguards against potential losses. UBS’ equity contribution to the stabilization fund, amounting to 10 percent of the assets purchased, serves as the primary loss protection. In the case of a loss on the SNB loan, the SNB’s warrant for 100 million UBS shares serves as secondary loss protection. This transaction should be classified as a QFA given the risk that the SNB may fail to recover all of its investment. In this case, the profits of the SNB distributed to the federal government would be lower, with a negative impact on the budget.
________________________
1/ On February 10, 2009, it was announced that the stabilization fund would acquire UBS assets for a lower
maximum amount than originally planned (approximately US$ 40 billion).

68. There are some areas, however, where the authorities could consider taking
further measures, in consultation with parliament where appropriate, to enhance fiscal
transparency and the presentation and management of fiscal risks. These are summarized
below.

Disclosure of additional fiscal information by the federal government

69. Support provided by the federal government and the SNB to UBS and other
financial institutions affected by the global crisis is reported in, respectively, the
confederation’s and the SNB’s financial statements, supplemented by quarterly updates
by the SNB. However, in order to provide a comprehensive assessment, the federal
government should consider publishing in its financial statements information on the SNB’s
support operations alongside the report of its own activities.

70. The government should publish its findings on tax expenditures and regularly
update them. Tax expenditures do not need to be appropriated each year, thereby escaping
scrutiny and the need to compete with other fiscal priorities in the budget process. Over time,
tax expenditures can result in insidious erosion of the tax base. The volume of tax
expenditures is significant, as a recent study by the FTA indicates. The government is aware
of the importance of keeping tax expenditures in check. It could consider publishing an
annual tax expenditure statement with the annual budget.36

71. The government should make an effort to disclose information on specific fiscal
risks, including contingent liabilities and QFAs, with the budget, in line with the IMF’s
Guidelines for Fiscal Risk Disclosure and Management, and eventually publish a single
statement of fiscal risks.37 In particular, the universal services provided by Swiss Post, Swiss
Rail, and others are partly financed through cross-subsidies, which represent a form of
interpersonal redistribution, and taxes and transfer payments from the budget are considered
more desirable to support such activities from a transparency perspective. QFAs are
disclosed only to a very limited extent.

72. The Social Security Funds should be clearly distinguished. Apart from the
unemployment insurance scheme, the other three funds are jointly operated. The old age and
disability pension funds are cross-financing each other, with the first fund running persistent
surpluses that are used to finance the deficits of the second. Clearly, separating the three
funds would make the financial health of each of them more transparent and facilitate the
necessary policy discussion about the sustainability of current policies. Parliament has
already passed a bill to separate the old-age and disability pension funds into two separate
funds. A referendum on the issue will be held in September 2009. In addition, an overview of
the finances of the social security sector and its relationship with the budget in the short to
medium term, in the context of an assessment of long-term fiscal sustainability, should be
included in the budget documents. More forward-looking information on the finances of the special funds would also be useful. Together, these measures would provide a better basis for
assessing the sustainability of current fiscal policy.

73. More information should be published on the sensitivity of the budget to changes
in macroeconomic variables and an alternative macroeconomic and fiscal scenario,
building on the useful analysis already published by the government. This would provide
a better basis for assessing the uncertainties surrounding the budget.38 In addition, the federal
government could consider extending and formalizing the process of external review of
macroeconomic forecasts and assessments of economic developments.

74. An overview of the finances of public corporations could also be provided in the
budget. Some corporations receive significant funding from the budget, and others conduct
QFAs, making it important to consider their financial position and profitability in the context
of fiscal policy.

75. Additional information should be reported on public debt management, namely,
the debt management strategy and performance against it, and the impact of parameter
changes on debt-servicing costs.

76. A summary statement of all new policy measures that are reflected in the budget
proposals, with an estimate of their fiscal impact, should be published, to supplement the
summary data on expenditure by tasks already provided in Volume 3 of the budget
documents.

77. Each federal government department should be encouraged to publish an
annual report that summarizes relevant information concerning their goals and objectives,
strategic priorities, operational risks, financial results, and nonfinancial performance. This
would be in line with practice in many OECD countries.

DOWNLOAD ORIGINAL DOCUMENT HERE

sm09164

CONFIDENTIAL – Banks Profited from Trillions in Secret Fed Bailout Programs

JPMorgan Chase chief Jamie Dimon speaks to a lunchtime gathering of the Portland Business Alliance, Thursday, Nov. 3, 2011 at the Portland Hilton in Portland, Ore. As CEO of JP Morgan Chase, he told shareholders that his bank used the Fed’s Term Auction Facility “at the request of the Federal Reserve to help motivate others to use the system.” He neglected to mention that the bank’s total TAF borrowings were almost twice its cash holdings. (AP Photo/The Oregonian, Randy L. Rasmussen)

Secret Fed Loans Helped Banks Net $13B (Bloomberg):

The Federal Reserve and the big banks fought for more than two years to keep details of the largest bailout in U.S. history a secret. Now, the rest of the world can see what it was missing.

The Fed didn’t tell anyone which banks were in trouble so deep they required a combined $1.2 trillion on Dec. 5, 2008, their single neediest day. Bankers didn’t mention that they took tens of billions of dollars in emergency loans at the same time they were assuring investors their firms were healthy. And no one calculated until now that banks reaped an estimated $13 billion of income by taking advantage of the Fed’s below-market rates, Bloomberg Markets magazine reports in its January issue.

Saved by the bailout, bankers lobbied against government regulations, a job made easier by the Fed, which never disclosed the details of the rescue to lawmakers even as Congress doled out more money and debated new rules aimed at preventing the next collapse.

A fresh narrative of the financial crisis of 2007 to 2009 emerges from 29,000 pages of Fed documents obtained under the Freedom of Information Act and central bank records of more than 21,000 transactions. While Fed officials say that almost all of the loans were repaid and there have been no losses, details suggest taxpayers paid a price beyond dollars as the secret funding helped preserve a broken status quo and enabled the biggest banks to grow even bigger.

The amount of money the central bank parceled out was surprising even to Gary H. Stern, president of the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis from 1985 to 2009, who says he “wasn’t aware of the magnitude.” It dwarfed the Treasury Department’s better-known $700 billion Troubled Asset Relief Program, or TARP. Add up guarantees and lending limits, and the Fed had committed $7.77 trillion as of March 2009 to rescuing the financial system, more than half the value of everything produced in the U.S. that year.

“TARP at least had some strings attached,” says Brad Miller, a North Carolina Democrat on the House Financial Services Committee, referring to the program’s executive-pay ceiling. “With the Fed programs, there was nothing.”

Bankers didn’t disclose the extent of their borrowing. On Nov. 26, 2008, then-Bank of America (BAC) Corp. Chief Executive Officer Kenneth D. Lewis wrote to shareholders that he headed “one of the strongest and most stable major banks in the world.” He didn’t say that his Charlotte, North Carolina-based firm owed the central bank $86 billion that day.

“When you see the dollars the banks got, it’s hard to make the case these were successful institutions,” says Sherrod Brown, a Democratic Senator from Ohio who in 2010 introduced an unsuccessful bill to limit bank size. “This is an issue that can unite the Tea Party and Occupy Wall Street. There are lawmakers in both parties who would change their votes now.”

The size of the bailout came to light after Bloomberg LP, the parent of Bloomberg News, won a court case against the Fed and a group of the biggest U.S. banks called Clearing House Association LLC to force lending details into the open.

The Treasury Department relied on the recommendations of the Fed to decide which banks were healthy enough to get TARP money and how much, the former officials say. The six biggest U.S. banks, which received $160 billion of TARP funds, borrowed as much as $460 billion from the Fed, measured by peak daily debt calculated by Bloomberg using data obtained from the central bank. Paulson didn’t respond to a request for comment.

The six — JPMorgan, Bank of America, Citigroup Inc. (C), Wells Fargo & Co. (WFC), Goldman Sachs Group Inc. (GS) and Morgan Stanley — accounted for 63 percent of the average daily debt to the Fed by all publicly traded U.S. banks, money managers and investment-services firms, the data show. By comparison, they had about half of the industry’s assets before the bailout, which lasted from August 2007 through April 2010. The daily debt figure excludes cash that banks passed along to money-market funds.

TARP and the Fed lending programs went “hand in hand,” says Sherrill Shaffer, a banking professor at the University of Wyoming in Laramie and a former chief economist at the New York Fed. While the TARP money helped insulate the central bank from losses, the Fed’s willingness to supply seemingly unlimited financing to the banks assured they wouldn’t collapse, protecting the Treasury’s TARP investments, he says.

“Even though the Treasury was in the headlines, the Fed was really behind the scenes engineering it,” Shaffer says.

Congress, at the urging of Bernanke and Paulson, created TARP in October 2008 after the bankruptcy of Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. made it difficult for financial institutions to get loans. Bank of America and New York-based Citigroup each received $45 billion from TARP. At the time, both were tapping the Fed. Citigroup hit its peak borrowing of $99.5 billion in January 2009, while Bank of America topped out in February 2009 at $91.4 billion.

Lawmakers knew none of this.

They had no clue that one bank, New York-based Morgan Stanley (MS), took $107 billion in Fed loans in September 2008, enough to pay off one-tenth of the country’s delinquent mortgages. The firm’s peak borrowing occurred the same day Congress rejected the proposed TARP bill, triggering the biggest point drop ever in the Dow Jones Industrial Average.  The bill later passed, and Morgan Stanley got $10 billion of TARP funds, though Paulson said only “healthy institutions” were eligible.

Mark Lake, a spokesman for Morgan Stanley, declined to comment, as did spokesmen for Citigroup and Goldman Sachs.

Had lawmakers known, it “could have changed the whole approach to reform legislation,” says Ted Kaufman, a former Democratic Senator from Delaware who, with Brown, introduced the bill to limit bank size.

TOP-SECRET – U.K. Embassies Preparing for Collapse of Euro

As the Italian government struggled to borrow and Spain considered seeking an international bail-out, British ministers privately warned that the break-up of the euro, once almost unthinkable, is now increasingly plausible.

Diplomats are preparing to help Britons abroad through a banking collapse and even riots arising from the debt crisis.

The Treasury confirmed earlier this month that contingency planning for a collapse is now under way.

A senior minister has now revealed the extent of the Government’s concern, saying that Britain is now planning on the basis that a euro collapse is now just a matter of time.

“It’s in our interests that they keep playing for time because that gives us more time to prepare,” the minister told.

Recent Foreign and Commonwealth Office instructions to embassies and consulates request contingency planning for extreme scenarios including rioting and social unrest.

Greece has seen several outbreaks of civil disorder as its government struggles with its huge debts. British officials think similar scenes cannot be ruled out in other nations if the euro collapses.

Diplomats have also been told to prepare to help tens of thousands of British citizens in eurozone countries with the consequences of a financial collapse that would leave them unable to access bank accounts or even withdraw cash.

Fuelling the fears of financial markets for the euro, reports in Madrid yesterday suggested that the new Popular Party government could seek a bail-out from either the European Union rescue fund or the International Monetary Fund.

Large-Scale Cash Smuggling Drives Billions of Dollars Out of Syria

Demonstrators protesting against Syria’s President Bashar al-Assad wave old Syrian flags as they march through the streets on the first day of the Muslim festival of Eid-al-Adha in Alsnmin near Daraa November 6, 2011.

Syrian capital flight intensifies (Financial Times):

Money has been streaming out of Syria as fears for the unstable economy lead Syrians to seek a safer place for their assets, according to members of the country’s business community.

Cash is being smuggled over the border to Lebanon “every day, every hour,” said one Syrian businessman, while another claimed Syrian money is being stashed in the grey economy that has long existed between the two countries.

In what many see as an example of the cross-border transfer, Syrian state news reported last month that officials had intercepted over $100,000 worth of Syrian pounds being smuggled across the Lebanese border under the seat of a car.

Samir Seifan, a Dubai-based Syrian economist, estimated Syria’s middle and upper classes had moved between three and five billion dollars out of the country since unrest broke out in March, alarmed by pressures on the currency and the dearth of investment opportunities.

The squeeze on Assad – June 30, 2011 (The Economist):

Public finances are in deep trouble. The president has raised government salaries and various subsidies to appease the populace. He cannot afford to do this. The government will probably print the money to meet its promises, so runaway inflation is likely, further fuelling popular anger as cash deposits become worthless.

Capital flight is rampant. Drivers on the roads into Lebanon talk of clients going from their bank in Damascus straight to one in Beirut, carrying large bags. According to one estimate, $20 billion has left the country since March, putting pressure on the Syrian pound. To slow capital flight, the government has raised interest rates. A phone company controlled by the Assad family sent out messages urging people to put money back into their accounts.

But a run on the banks cannot be ruled out. Over the past few years, about 60% of lending in Syria has been for people to buy their own cars. Many can no longer keep up with payments. A leading financier says, “If one of the smaller banks defaults, we all go down.” Some branches are even displaying millions of dollars—in bundles of notes piled head high—to reassure worried customers. Some keep enough cash in the vaults to repay almost half their depositors on the spot.

TOP-SECRET-NEW-IMF, EU, European Central Bank “Troika” Greece Debt Sustainability Analysis October 21, 2011

Since the fourth review, the situation in Greece has taken a turn for the worse, with the economy increasingly adjusting through recession and related wage-price channels, rather than through structural reform driven increases in productivity. The authorities have also struggled to meet their policy commitments against these headwinds. For the purpose of the debt sustainability assessment, a revised baseline has been specified, which takes into account the implications of these developments for future growth and for likely policy outcomes. It has been extended through 2030 to fully capture long term growth dynamics, and possible financing implications.

The assessment shows that debt will remain high for the entire forecast horizon. While it would decline at a slow rate given heavy official support at low interest rates (through the EFSF as agreed at the July 21 Summit), this trajectory is not robust to a range of shocks. Making debt sustainable will require an ambitious combination of official support and private sector involvement (PSI). Even with much stronger PSI, large official sector support would be needed for an extended period. In this sense, ultimately sustainability depends on the strength of the official sector commitment to Greece.

3. Under these assumptions, Greece’s debt peaks at very high levels and would decline at a very slow rate pointing to the need for further debt relief to ensure sustainability. Debt (net of collateral required for PSI) would peak at 186 percent of GDP in 2013 and decline only to 152 percent of GDP by end-2020 and to 130 percent of GDP by end-2030. The financing package agreed on July 21(especially lower rates on EFSF loans) does help the debt trajectory, but its impact is more than offset by the revised macro and policy framework. Greece would not return to the market until 2021 under the market access assumptions used, and cumulatively official additional financing needs (beyond what remains in the present program, and including the eventual rollover of existing official loans) could amount to some €252 billion from the present through to 2020.

GreeceDebtSustainability

DOWNLOAD LINK ABOVE

U.S. Attorney Announces Pension Disability Fraud Charges – $1 Billion

PREET BHARARA, the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York, MARTIN J. DICKMAN, Inspector General of the Railroad Retirement Board, Office of the Inspector General (“RRB-OIG”), JANICE K. FEDARCYK, the Assistant Director in Charge of the New York Office of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (“FBI”), and BARRY L. KLUGER, Inspector General of the New York State Metropolitan Transportation Authority, Office of the Inspector General (“MTA-OIG”), announced today charges against 11 defendants for participating in a massive fraud scheme from 1998 to the present in which Long Island Railroad (“LIRR”) workers claimed to be disabled upon early retirement so that they could receive extra pension benefits to which they were not entitled. Charged today are (i) two doctors and an office manager for one of the doctors who were involved in falsely diagnosing retiring LIRR workers as disabled; (ii) two “facilitators” who served as liaisons between retiring workers and the participating doctors; and (iii) seven LIRR retirees (including one of the charged facilitators) who claimed RRB disability benefits to which they were not entitled. The fraudulent scheme could ultimately cause the RRB to pay in excess of $1 billion in unwarranted occupational disability benefits if disbursed in full.

Manhattan U.S. Attorney PREET BHARARA said: “Benefit programs like the RRB’s disability pension program were designed to be a safety net for the truly disabled, not a feeding trough for the truly dishonest. And in these tough economic times—with stretched budgets, rising costs, frozen wages, and unemployed people—it is especially disheartening to think that railroad employees would tell a train of lies to pad their early retirements, and that a handful of doctors would traffic on the credibility of their profession to promote a culture of fraud. If the charges are proved, it will be yet another disheartening example of the kind of corruption we have seen all too much of lately.”

RRB-OIG Inspector General MARTIN J. DICKMAN said: “Lying in disability applications is a serious crime that honest taxpayers cannot abide, and that the RRB-OIG will aggressively continue to root out. Through our ongoing investigation, we will continue to hold accountable those who would abuse a system that is meant for legitimately disabled workers who have served on our nation’s railroads. I would like to thank the dedicated agents from my Office for their outstanding work on this investigation, as well as our law enforcement partners at the United States Attorney’s Office and the FBI.”

FBI Assistant Director in Charge JANICE K. FEDARCYK said: “The Complaint lays out a pervasive scheme by doctors, facilitators, and retirees to defraud the Rail Road Retirement Board disability pension program. This massive fraud, an additional burden on cash-strapped commuters, could cost more than one billion dollars. Until today, this was a game where every retiree was a winner. But today’s arrests signal the end of the line for the money train.”

MTA-OIG Inspector General BARRY L. KLUGER said: “Public pension fraud takes a toll not only on our pocketbook, but on the credibility of our government, our pension systems and our sense of fair play. We have been working for quite some time on this matter, first, with the Attorney General of the State of New York under now-Governor Andrew Cuomo, and currently with the Manhattan U.S. Attorney, the FBI, and the Railroad Retirement Board Inspector General to take the investigation of railroad disability pension fraud to the next level. I thank U.S. Attorney Bharara, his staff, and our partners for their dedication to combating pension fraud. We are pleased to have played a part in this investigation.”

Overview of LIRR & RRB Pension System

The RRB is an independent U.S. agency that administers benefit programs, including disability benefits, for the nation’s railroad workers and their families. A unique LIRR contract allows employees to retire at the relatively young age of 50, provided they have been employed for at least 20 years. It is the only commuter railroad in the United States that offers a retirement pension at the age of 50. At that time, employees are entitled to receive an LIRR pension, which is a portion of the full retirement payment they are eligible for at 65, when they also receive an RRB pension. Therefore, if an LIRR worker retires at 50, he or she will receive less than their prior salary and substantially lower pension payments than what they would be entitled to at 65.

However, an LIRR employee who retires and claims disability may receive a disability payment from RRB on top of their LIRR pension, regardless of age. A retiree’s LIRR pension, in combination with RRB disability payments, can equal roughly the base salary earned during his or her career.

The Premeditated Disability Fraud Scheme

As alleged in the Complaint, hundreds of LIRR employees have exploited the overlap between the LIRR pension and the RRB disability program by pre-planning the date on which they would falsely declare themselves disabled so that it would coincide with their projected retirement date. These false statements, made under oath in disability applications, allowed these LIRR employees to retire as early as age 50 with an LIRR pension, supplemented by the fraudulently-obtained RRB disability annuity. Between 2004 and 2008, 61 percent of LIRR employees who claimed an RRB benefit were between the ages of 50 and 55. Each of these employees received a disability award. In contrast, only 7 percent of employees at Metro-North who stopped working and received disability benefits during this time period were between the ages of 50 and 55. It is estimated that the fraudulently obtained RRB payments to LIRR retirees could exceed $1 billion.

The Disability Doctors

As alleged in the Complaint, three New York-area doctors accounted for 86 percent of the LIRR disability applications filed prior to 2008: PETER J. AJEMIAN, PETER LESNIEWSKI and a third unnamed doctor (“Disability Doctor-3”), who is recently deceased. AJEMIAN is a Board-certified orthopedist and recommended at least 839 LIRR employees for disability between 1998 through 2008. LESNIEWSKI is also a Board-certified orthopedist and recommended at least 222 LIRR workers for disability benefits between 1998 and 2008.

AJEMIAN, with the assistance of his office manager, MARIA RUSIN, and LESNIEWSKI used their respective medical practices as “disability mills,” preparing fraudulent medical narratives for LIRR retirees well before the employees’ planned retirement dates so that the narratives could be submitted to the RRB upon retirement. These medical narratives were fabricated or grossly exaggerated to recommend a set of restrictions that, if bona fide, would have rendered it impossible for the LIRR employees to continue in their occupations. Many of the purportedly “objective” findings from the tests they conducted showed nothing more than normal degenerative changes one would expect to see in patients within the relevant age bracket.

For example, in a conversation between AJEMIAN and a colleague, (“Medical Worker-1”) that was consensually recorded, AJEMIAN stated in 2008 that he knew patients came to his office with the “expectation…[that] they’re gonna end up with a narrative suggesting disability,” and that he thought he had recommended disability “one hundred percent” of the time. In a statement written and signed by LESNIEWSKI after an October 2008 interview conducted by law enforcement agents, LESNIEWSKI admitted to preparing false disability narratives.

AJEMIAN and LESNIEWSKI received approximately $800 to $1,200, often in cash, for these fraudulent assessments and narratives, as well as millions of dollars in health insurance payments for unnecessary medical treatments and fees for preparing fraudulent medical support for the claimed disabilities. Of approximately 453 LIRR annuitants studied, AJEMIAN received approximately $2.5 million in related payments from patients and insurance companies. In turn, those patients have already received over $90 million in RRB disability benefit payments and are slated to receive more than $210 million in total. From a sampling of 134 LIRR annuitants, LESNIEWSKI received approximately $750,000 in related payments from patients and insurance companies. In turn, those patients have already received over $31 million in RRB disability benefit payments and are slated to receive more than $64 million in total.

The Facilitators

To further increase one’s chances of receiving disability from the RRB, LIRR employees utilized the services of “facilitators.” Facilitators referred LIRR workers to the disability doctors, filled out the applications on behalf of their LIRR clients, and assisted and coached their clients to fill out their disability applications in such a way as to maximize the likelihood that they would receive disability benefits.

Two facilitators charged today are MARIE BARAN and JOSEPH RUTIGLIANO. Before working as a facilitator, BARAN served as an RRB district office manager in Westbury, New York, until her retirement in December 2006. BARAN’s husband, an LIRR retiree, receives RRB disability benefits based on a medical assessment done by LESNIEWSKI.

In a September 2008 interview with BARAN that was conducted by a law enforcement agent, she said, “you are never going to figure it [this scheme] out honey.” She also said it was not her fault the disability system was “broken,” and she would simply tell her patients to, “go ahead, give it a shot at the O/D [occupational disability].”

RUTIGLIANO is a former LIRR conductor and union president who applied for and received an RRB occupational disability after his retirement in 1999. In the year prior to retiring, he worked well over 500 hours overtime, took no sick leave whatsoever, and then applied for a disability with a narrative prepared by LESNIEWSKI. The narrative stated that RUTIGLIANO fractured his spine in 1988 and that his back pain was getting worse over the years, but LESNIEWSKI offered no explanation for why this 10-year-old injury did not interfere with RUTIGLIANO’s overtime collection or failure to require any sick days. Moreover, golf course records and law enforcement surveillance performed in July 2008 indicate that RUTIGLIANO played golf at one particular course about two times per month in 2008.

The LIRR Retirees

Hundreds of the disability doctors’ patients, including JOSEPH RUTIGLIANO, GREGORY NOONE, REGINA WALSH, SHARON FALLOON, GARY SATIN, STEVEN GAGLIANO and RICHARD EHRLINGER, lied to the RRB about their ability to work in order to get disability payments.

NOONE annually receives at least $105,000 in combined pension and disability payments, based on a disability he planned months in advance of its claimed onset. In his disability application, NOONE claimed that he suffered severe pain when gripping and using simple hand tools and pain in his knees, shoulder, and back from bending or crouching. In AJEMIAN’s medical assessment, he claimed that NOONE’s condition warranted restrictions on bending, stooping, and reaching overhead. Nevertheless, NOONE regularly plays tennis several times per week, and in a nine-month period in 2008, NOONE signed in to play golf at a particular course on 140 days.

WALSH, who worked as director of employee services at the LIRR, annually receives at least $108,000 in combined pension and disability payments, based on a disability she planned months in advance of its claimed onset. In her disability application, WALSH claimed that sitting at a desk and using a computer caused her considerable neck, shoulder, and hand pain, and that she experienced leg pains when standing more than five minutes or when sitting more than 15 minutes. Nevertheless, WALSH has been surveilled shoveling heavy snow for over an hour and walking with a baby stroller for approximately 40 minutes.

FALLOON, an LIRR human resources manager, annually receives at least $90,349 in combined pension and disability payments, based on her claims that activities such as walking and standing cause her “disabling pain” and stairs are “very difficult” for her. Nevertheless, in January 2011, FALLOON was surveilled vigorously exercising at a gym, including approximately 45 minutes in a step aerobics class. Law enforcement recorded her continuously exercising at the gym for more than two hours, at which point the video concluded because the tape ran out, although FALLOON continued her workout.

SATIN annually receives at least $69,559 in combined pension and disability payments, based on a disability he planned at least one year before its claimed onset. In his disability application, SATIN claimed that his condition rendered indoor and outdoor chores “difficult,” and AJEMIAN claimed that SATIN “cannot continue working.” Nevertheless, SATIN admitted to law enforcement agents that he was still capable of performing his railroad work. In addition, SATIN has performed landscaping, contracting, and electrical work for pay since retiring from the LIRR due to a purported disability.

EHRLINGER annually receives at least $56,959 in combined pension and disability benefits, based on a disability he planned at least one year before its claimed onset. In his disability application, EHRLINGER claimed that his condition included knee pain that caused him problems walking and getting on and off trains. Nevertheless, EHRLINGER runs a party rental business and has been surveilled personally loading and unloading stacks of chairs and tables.

GAGLIANO annually receives at least $76,810 in combined pension and disability payments, for a purported disability that he claimed rendered him unable to “do any of the physical labor required in his job as a signalman” because of “severe and disabling pain in back, shoulder & legs,” and that LESNIEWSKI claimed rendered GAGLIANO occupationally disabled. Nevertheless, in 2009, GAGLIANO participated in a 400-mile bike tour in northern New York.

* * *

AJEMIAN, RUSIN, BARAN, RUTIGLIANO, NOONE, WALSH, FALLOON, GAGLIANO and EHRLINGER were taken into custody this morning and are expected to be presented in Manhattan federal court later this afternoon. SATIN was taken into custody in North Carolina and will be presented in federal court in Charlotte later today. LESNIEWSKI is expected to voluntarily surrender to authorities in the Southern District of New York tomorrow. All 11 defendants are charged with conspiracy to commit health care fraud and mail fraud, which carries a maximum sentence of 20 years in prison. Attached is a chart reflecting the age and place of residence for each of the charged defendants.

Manhattan U.S. Attorney BHARARA praised the RRB-OIG, the FBI, and the MTA-OIG for their outstanding work in the investigation, which he noted is ongoing. He also acknowledged the previous investigation conducted by the New York State Attorney General’s Office into these pension fraud issues.

The Office’s Complex Frauds Unit is handling the case. Assistant U.S. Attorneys JUSTIN S. WEDDLE, E. DANYA PERRY and WILLIAM J. HARRINGTON are in charge of the prosecution.

The charge contained in the Complaint is merely an accusation and the defendants are presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty.

FBI: Former Agape World, Inc. Owner and President Sentenced to 25 Years’ Imprisonment for Multi-Million-Dollar Ponzi Scheme

Long Island-Based Defendant Caused Thousands of Investors to Lose $195 Million

U.S. Attorney’s Office October 14, 2011
  • Eastern District of New York (718) 254-7000

Nicholas Cosmo, the former owner and president of Hauppauge-based companies Agape World, Inc. (Agape) and Agape Merchant Advance (AMA), was sentenced today to 25 years of imprisonment by United States District Court Judge Denis R. Hurley in federal court in Central Islip. On October 29, 2010, Cosmo pled guilty to committing mail and wire fraud in connection with his operation of a massive Ponzi scheme involving the theft of more than $195 million of investor money that was supposed to be used to fund short-term commercial loans. Cosmo was ordered to pay $179 million in restitution to more than 4,000 victims and agreed to an asset forfeiture judgment in the amount of $409,305,000 as part of his sentence.

The sentence was announced today by Loretta E. Lynch, United States Attorney for the Eastern District of New York.

Cosmo, and others working at his direction, fraudulently obtained in excess of $400 million from investors over a five-year period by representing that the funds would be used by Agape either to fund short-term secured bridge loans to commercial borrowers, or used by AMA to make short-term loans to small businesses. Investors were told that the loans generated high interest rates which would result in payment of high rates of return on their investments. Cosmo often failed to make the short-term loans, admittedly using approximately $80 million of investor money to trade futures and commodities unbeknownst to investors, and paid false profits to early investors in the scheme using new investors’ money.

At the sentencing proceeding several victims, many of whom stated that they lost their family’s life savings, described the devastating effect of their losses as a result of Cosmo’s criminal actions.

“As recounted today in court by several of his victims, the defendant’s actions crushed the hopes and dreams of everyday citizens. We stand committed to ensuring that our markets operate fairly and honestly, and we will aggressively investigate and prosecute those who fraudulently enrich themselves at the expense of investors,”stated United States Attorney Lynch. “Those who lie and steal from the investing public are on notice that they face severe penalties,” Ms. Lynch expressed her grateful appreciation to the United States Postal Inspection Service and Federal Bureau of Investigation, the agencies responsible for leading the government’s investigation.

The government’s case was prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorneys Demetri M. Jones, Grace M. Cucchissi and Vincent Lipari.

The Defendant:

NICHOLAS COSMO
Age: 40

Occupy Wall Street-USA Photos, 8 October 2011, Day 22

Washington DC

[Image]Demonstrators who camped out at Freedom Plaza wake up for the third day of demonstrations Saturday, Oct. 8, 2011, as part of Occupy DC activities in Washington. (Jose Luis Magana)
[Image]One demonstrator helps another flush her eyes with water after after police pepper-sprayed a group of protestors, who were trying to get into the National Air and Space Museum in Washington Saturday, Oct. 8, 2011, as part of Occupy DC activities in Washington. (Jose Luis Magana)
[Image]Pepper-sprayed demonstrators sit and lie on the ground outside the entrance to the National Air and Space Museum in Washington after a group of protestors tryed to get into the museum Saturday, Oct. 8, 2011, as part of Occupy DC activities in Washington. (Jose Luis Magana)
[Image]Demonstrators react at the entrance of the National Air and Space Museum in Washington after police pepper-sprayed a group of protestors trying to get into the museum Saturday, Oct. 8, 2011, as part of Occupy DC activities in Washington. (Jose Luis Magana)
[Image]A demonstrator lies on the ground at an entrance to the National Air and Space Museum in Washington after police pepper-sprayed a group of protestors trying to get into the museum Saturday, Oct. 8, 2011, as part of Occupy DC activities in Washington. (Jose Luis Magana)
[Image]Demonstrators march through the streets of Washington Saturday, Oct. 8, 2011, as part of the Occupy DC activities in the nation’s capital. (Jose Luis Magana)
[Image]Demonstrators protest at Freedom Plaza in Washington on Saturday, Oct. 8, 2011, on day three of demonstrations in Washington as part of Occupy DC activities. (Jose Luis Magana)
[Image]Demonstrators carrying a variety of signs march through the streets of Washington Saturday, Oct. 8, 2011, as part of Occupy DC activities in the nation’s capital. (Jose Luis Magana)

Boston

[Image]Matthew Gember, of Chicago, makes a point as Occupy Boston demonstrators protest on the plaza in front of the Federal Reserve Bank in Boston, Saturday, Oct. 8, 2011. (Michael Dwyer)
[Image]Occupy Boston protesters demonstrate on the plaza in front of the Federal Reserve Bank in Boston, Saturday, Oct. 8, 2011. (Michael Dwyer)
[Image]Courtney Haskell, lower left, of North Reading, Mass., demonstrates on the plaza in front of the Federal Reserve Bank in Boston as police reflected in a motorcycle mirror look on, Saturday, Oct. 8, 2011. (Michael Dwyer)

Casper

[Image]Marilyn Mullen stands in support for the ‘Occupy Wall Street’ movement during the Casper, Wyo. rally on Center Street Saturday, Oct. 8, 2011 Over 50 people held signs and American flags in support of the demonstration which is trying to achieve change in government tax law, asking the wealthy to pay an equal percentage of taxes that the working class pays. (Tim Kupsick)

Cincinnati

[Image]With a statue of Abraham Lincoln at center right, protesters begin their march through downtown Cincinnati during the Occupy Cincinnati protest, Saturday, Oct. 8, 2011. The Occupy Wall Street movement started in New York City last month and is spreading to other parts of the country. (David Kohl)
[Image]Protesters march through downtown Cincinnati for the Occupy Cincinnati protest on Saturday, Oct. 8, 2011. The Occupy Wall Street movement started in New York City last month and is spreading to other parts of the country. (David Kohl)

Indianapolis

[Image]Tamra Bell 52, back right, and her four children Stephanie Stayton, 28, left front, Robert 21, left back, and Courtney 23, attend the Occupy Indy protest in Indianapolis on Saturday, Oct. 8, 2011. Tamra’s husband has been unemployed for two years and suffers from health problems. His unemployment will soon run out and Bell is on the verge of losing the home. The small income her son Robert brings in has helped the family to stay in their home so far. The Occupy Wall Street movement started in New York City last month and is spreading to other parts of the country. (Michelle Pemberton)
[Image]More than a thousand demonstrators gather in Veteran’s Plaza in Indianapolis on Saturday, Oct. 8, 2011 for Occupy Indy, a protest against everything from bank foreclosures and corporate influence in politics to the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and unemployment. The Occupy Wall Street movement started in New York City last month and is spreading to other parts of the country. (Michelle Pemberton)
[Image]A demonstrator holds a sign as more than a thousand gather in Veteran’s Plaza in Indianapolis on Saturday, Oct. 8, 2011 for Occupy Indy, a protest against everything from bank foreclosures and corporate influence in politics to the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and unemployment. The Occupy Wall Street movement started in New York City last month and is spreading to other parts of the country. (Michelle Pemberton)
[Image]More than a thousand protesters march through Indianapolis on Saturday, Oct. 8, 2011 for Occupy Indy, a protest against everything from bank foreclosures and corporate influence in politics to the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and unemployment. The Occupy Wall Street movement started in New York City last month and is spreading to other parts of the country. (Michelle Pemberton)

New York

[Image]Occupy Wall Street protesters gather in Washington Square Park, Saturday, Oct. 8, 2011 in New York. The Occupy Wall Street movement started in New York City last month and is spreading to other parts of the country. (Henny Ray Abrams)
[Image]Demonstrators holding signs gather at the Occupy Wall Street rally in New York on Saturday, Oct. 8, 2011. (Caleb Jones)
[Image]Protesters with Occupy Wall Street march from Zuccotti Park to Washington Square Park in New York on Saturday, Oct. 8, 2011. The Occupy Wall Street movement started in New York City last month and is spreading to other parts of the country. (Henny Ray Abrams)
[Image]Hundreds of skateboarders heading down Broadway toward OWS from West 89th Street and Broadway, October 8, 2011. (Cryptome)
[Image]In this Friday, Oct. 7, 2011 photo, Cherie Walters, 58, from Mount Clemens, Mich., poses for a photograph, in New York. Walters, who has participated in Occupy Wall Street protests, is wearing the shirt she wore to two of the protests. (Tina Fineberg)

Philadelphia

[Image]People hold signs and are reflected in a bus stop pane, as they walk in the street during their march from City Hall to the Independence National Historical Park Saturday, Oct. 8, 2011, in Philadelphia. Organizers of what is being called Occupy Philadelphia say the demonstration is meant to be a stand against corporate greed. (Alex Brandon)
[Image]People hold signs as they walk in the street during their march from City Hall to the Independence National Historical Park Saturday, Oct. 8, 2011 in Philadelphia. Organizers of what is being called Occupy Philadelphia say the demonstration is meant to be a stand against corporate greed. (Alex Brandon)

	

Die “GoMoPa” – Wirecard Lüge – Das LKA Bayern ermittelt

http://www.handelsblatt.com/finanzen/boerse-maerkte/boerse-inside/finanzaufsicht-untersucht-kursachterbahn-bei-wirecard/3406252.html

http://www.usag24-betrug.com/index.php/gomopas-wirecard-behauptungen-zweifelhaft-schuett-hat-keinerlei-behauptungen-zu-wirecard-gemacht/

So wollte “GoMoPa” mich erpressen und stoppen

https://berndpulch.org/bernd-pulch-der-beweis-%E2%80%93-so-wollte-der-serienbetruger-klaus-maurischat-uns-zwingen-die-berichterstattung-uber-den-%E2%80%9Cnachrichtendienst%E2%80%9D-%E2%80%9Cgomopa%E2%80%9D-einzustellen/

Von rufMÖRDERN u. Serienbetrügern erfundene “GoMoPa-SJB” beschreiben ihre ruf-MORDE höchstselbst

http://www.victims-opfer.com/?p=16359

FREI ERFUNDENE LÜGEN DER FINGIERTEN “GoMoPa” – z.B.: MERIDIAN CAPITAL/PRESS RELEASER, PROFESSOR STELZER, WIRECARD

1) Meridian Capital – “GoMoPa”-Fälschung auf Pressreleaser.org (einer von “GoMoPa”‘s eigenen Tarnseiten ohne Impressum)

http://meridiancapital.wordpress.com/

https://berndpulch.org/2011/08/13/beweis-wie-%E2%80%9Cgomopa%E2%80%9D-meridian-capital-erpresst-hat-und-maurischat-von-interpol-und-bka-festgenommen-wurde-%E2%80%93-verwirrspiele-nach-stasi-muster/

2) Professor Minister Stelter

https://berndpulch.org/die-frei-erfundenen-gomopa-lugen-fall-professor-minister-stelter/

3) Wirecard

http://www.handelsblatt.com/finanzen/boerse-maerkte/boerse-inside/finanzaufsicht-untersucht-kursachterbahn-bei-wirecard/3406252.html

https://berndpulch.org/2011/04/29/die-wirecard-luge-und-der-kursbetrug-der-erfundenen-goldman-morgenstern-u-partner-alias-gomopa/

http://www.victims-opfer.com/?p=15261

FAZ:

Wirtschaftskriminalität Großrazzia wegen Verdachts auf Insiderhandel

Schlag gegen mutmaßliche Anlagebetrüger: Die Staatsanwaltschaft München hat in einer Großrazzia Dutzende Büros und Wohnungen nach Beweisen für Insiderhandel durchsucht. Drei Verdächtige wurden verhaftet. Durchsucht wurde auch die Schutzgemeinschaft der Kapitalanleger.

Von Henning Peitsmeier

24.09.2010 2010-09-24T08:31:05+0200

//

© Wolfgang Eilmes / F.A.Z.

Betrugsverdacht: An der Börse sollen fast wertlose Papiere gekauft, die Kurse durch gezielt positive Nachrichten nach oben getrieben und dann wieder verkauft worden sein

Die Münchner Staatsanwaltschaft hat in einer Großrazzia umfangreiches Beweismaterial gegen mutmaßliche Anlagebetrüger sichergestellt. Ermittelt wird gegen ein Netzwerk von Investoren, Zockern und Gerüchtestreuern, die seit Jahren gemeinsame Sache gemacht haben sollen. Die Vorwürfe lauten auf Marktmanipulation und Insiderhandel mit Aktien, sagte die Sprecherin der Anklagebehörde, Barbara Stockinger. „Wir ermitteln gegen 31 Beschuldigte, und es besteht erheblicher Tatverdacht.“ Dabei laufen die Ermittlungen bereits seit 2007, und sie reichen bis hin zur Schutzgemeinschaft der Kapitalanleger (SdK), deren Redner gern auf den Hauptversammlungen von Dax-Konzernen auftreten.

Nach Informationen der F.A.Z. sitzen die früheren SdK-Sprecher Markus Straub und Tobias Bosler in Untersuchungshaft. Sie gehören zum Kreis der Verdächtigen, die in windigen Börsenbriefen und Internetportalen Gerüchte über Aktien von Unternehmen wie Wirecard oder Nascacell verbreitet haben sollen. Erschwert würden die Untersuchungen, weil die Beschuldigten oft Namen und Firmenadressen wechselten und internationale Durchsuchungsbeschlüsse notwendig gewesen seien, sagte eine mit der Angelegenheit befasste Person dieser Zeitung. Die Masche selbst ist nach ihren Angaben leicht durchschaubar, aber schwer nachzuweisen. Vermutlich haben sämtliche Verdächtige Gerüchte über mindestens 20 kleine Aktiengesellschaften gestreut und an den Kursausschlägen der jeweiligen Aktien kräftig verdient. Gegenstand dieser Geschäfte waren bevorzugt im unregulierten Freihandel notierte und meist wertlose Aktien, sogenannte Pennystocks. Die Kurse dieser Werte sind wegen ihres hohen Streubesitzes leicht zu manipulieren.

Gezielt Gerüchte gestreut

Nach Informationen der F.A.Z. sollen unter anderem gezielt über den Finanznachrichtendienst Gomopa im Internet Gerüchte über Pennystocks gestreut worden sein. Gomopa steht für Goldman Morgenstern & Partners Consulting LLC. Auf ihrer Internetseite hat Gomopa „Transparenz in Sachen Finanzen, Vorsorge und Geldanlage“ versprochen, doch ihr Chef Klaus Maurischat saß als mutmaßlicher Betrüger schon in Untersuchungshaft.

Seit einigen Tagen ist die Internetseite http://www.gomopa.net offline, und es kursieren Gerüchte über finanzielle Unregelmäßigkeiten. Immer wieder ist Gomopa in juristische Streitigkeiten verwickelt. In einer einstweiligen Verfügung des Landgerichts Berlin vom 31. August (Az.: 27 O 658/10) ist das Unternehmen aufgefordert worden, nicht länger Falschinformationen über den Kasseler Immobilienhändler Immovation AG und seinen Finanzvorstand Lars Bergmann zu verbreiten. „Gomopa hat seinen Firmensitz bewusst in New York, weil die Firma dort presserechtlich nicht belangt werden kann“, sagte ein Kenner des Unternehmens der F.A.Z.

Die SdK räumte am Freitag ein, dass auch ihre Geschäftsräume durchsucht wurden. Es gebe jedoch „aus der Sicht der SdK keinerlei neue Vorwürfe gegen den Verein“. Die alten Vorwürfe gegen die SdK stehen im Zusammenhang mit Kursmanipulationen bei Aktien der Unternehmen Thielert und Wirecard. Staatsanwaltschaft und Allfinanzaufsicht Bafin ermittelten seinerzeit gegen den damaligen stellvertretenden SdK-Vorsitzenden Straub. Dieser hatte eingeräumt, Verkaufsoptionen auf das Zahlungsunternehmen Wirecard zu halten, dessen Kurs durch heftige Kritik der SdK unter Druck geraten war. Später trat Straub, der offenbar in kurzer Zeit ein Vermögen verdient hatte, zurück. Wirecard hatte Anzeige wegen Insiderhandels und Kursmanipulation gegen sechs Personen erstattet, darunter auch aktuelle und frühere SdK-Vorstände.

TOP-SECRET FROM THE DESK OF THE FBI – Four arrests in $20 million bribery scheme involving government contracts

U.S. Attorney’s Office October 04, 2011
  • District of Columbia (202) 514-7566

WASHINGTON—Four Virginia men, including two longtime employees of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, were arrested today on charges stemming from an indictment that accuses them of taking part in a conspiracy involving more than $20 million in bribes and kickback payments and the planned steering of a $780 million government contract to a favored contractor.

The arrests were announced by U.S. Attorney Ronald C. Machen Jr.; James W. McJunkin, Assistant Director in Charge of the FBI’s Washington Field Office; Peggy E. Gustafson, Inspector General for the Small Business Administration (SBA); Robert E. Craig, Special Agent in Charge of the Mid-Atlantic Field Office of the Defense Criminal Investigative Service (DCIS); Jeannine A. Hammett, Acting Special Agent in Charge of the Washington Field Office of the Internal Revenue Service-Criminal Investigation (IRS-CI); and James K. Podolak, Director of the U.S. Army Criminal Investigation Command’s (CID) Major Procurement Fraud Unit.

The defendants include Kerry F. Khan, 53, of Alexandria, Va.; his son, Lee A. Khan, 30, of Fairfax, Va.; Michael A. Alexander, 55, of Woodbridge, Va.; and Harold F. Babb, 60, of Sterling, Va. Kerry Khan and Alexander are employed by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, and Babb is director of contracts for a company that did business with the government.

All four men were taken into custody on charges contained in an indictment that was returned by a grand jury, under seal, on Sept. 16, 2011, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. The arrests took place as authorities executed search warrants at seven locations in Virginia and one in the District of Columbia. The indictment was unsealed today.

According to the indictment, Kerry Khan and Alexander helped funnel more than $45 million in payments to a favored company through a federal government contract they oversaw, with plans to steer hundreds of millions more to the business. Approximately $20 million in fraudulent expenses were built into the invoices, and proceeds went to all four defendants.

All four defendants were indicted on one count of conspiracy to commit bribery and wire fraud and aiding and abetting and causing an illlegal act to be done, as well as one count of conspiracy to commit money laundering. Kerry Khan and Alexander also were indicted on one count of receipt of a bribe by a public official, and Babb was indicted on one count of unlawful kickbacks.

If convicted of the charges, Kerry Khan and Alexander face a maximum of 40 years in prison. Babb faces up to 35 years, and Lee Khan faces a sentence of up to 25 years.

The United States has obtained warrants to seize funds in 29 bank accounts and to seize three luxury vehicles and seven high-end watches. In addition, the indictment includes a forfeiture allegation against 16 real properties financed in whole or in part with proceeds of the crimes. The United States has begun the process of securing forfeiture of those 16 properties, which include 14 properties in Virginia, one in West Virginia, and one in Florida.

The indictment also provides the defendants notice that, if convicted, the United States will seek forfeiture of all proceeds of the charged offenses.

“This indictment alleges one of the most brazen corruption schemes in the history of federal contracting,” said U.S. Attorney Machen. “As alleged by the indictment, corrupt public officials and crooked contractors devised a plan to funnel more than $20 million in taxpayer funds to themselves in an elaborate scheme of bribes and kickbacks. These charges are only the beginning of a far-reaching, steadfast effort by the U.S. Attorney’s Office, the Department of Justice, and our federal law enforcement partners to root out and hold accountable shameless government officials and those who entice them—through bribes and other personal benefits—to violate the public’s trust.”

“Abusing one’s position for personal gain blatantly disregards the oath that every government employee takes and everything that it represents,” said Assistant Director in Charge McJunkin. “It’s offensive to citizens who trust the government and its contractors to use taxpayer money wisely.”

“The alleged actions of these individuals grossly undermine the honest work being done every day by federal employees and government contractors,” said Inspector General Gustafson of the SBA. “These individuals conspired to steal from the American people by perpetuating a fraud to siphon vital resources away from an organization that supports our military and reduces risks from disasters. The SBA OIG will relentlessly pursue such violations of public trust and seek justice on behalf of the taxpayers.”

“At a time when government and taxpayer resources are being stretched thin and our service members continue to make sacrifices to protect our national security across the globe, it is abhorrent that officials trusted with the oversight of Department of Defense resources and programs blatantly conspired with contractors to defraud the Government and, eventually, the American warfighter,” said Special Agent in Charge Craig of DCIS. “The Defense Criminal Investigative Service takes aggressive action to identify and investigate, alongside our federal investigative partners, those that endeavor to take advantage of the Department of Defense and the men and women of the Uniformed Services.”

“IRS Criminal Investigation often works jointly with other law enforcement agencies to provide financial investigative expertise. The charges brought in this case demonstrate our collective efforts to enforce the law and ensure public trust,” said Acting IRS Special Agent in Charge Hammett. “U.S. government employees hold positions of public trust, and they are responsible for managing public funds. The public has the right to know that those who work for them are doing so honestly. When we discover bribery schemes like the one alleged here, we will do everything in our power to hold both the bribe payer and the person accepting the bribe accountable.”

“Today’s arrests are a prime example of the teamwork among the special agents of the U.S. Army Criminal Investigation Command’s Major Procurement Fraud Unit (MPFU), our fellow federal law enforcement agencies and the Department of Justice attorneys,” said Director Podolak. “U.S. Army CID will continue to see to it that anyone suspected of contract fraud and corruption is brought to justice.”

**

The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is a branch of the U.S. Army with a stated mission to “provide vital public engineering services in peace and war to strengthen our Nation’s security, energize the economy, and reduce risks from disasters.”

The indictment details schemes to defraud two major federal contracts:

The TIGER Contract. The Technology for Instrastructure, Geospatial, and Environmental Requirements (TIGER) contract is what is known as an Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity contract. Authorized agencies and departments are not required to obtain three separate bids or to compare the TIGER contract to another contract before submitting an invoice for products and services through the TIGER contract. The current TIGER contract is a five-year contract running from Oct. 1, 2009 through Sept. 30, 2014. Over the term, the total award of orders placed against the TIGER contract is authorized to exceed $1 billion.

The CORES Contract. The Contingency Operations Readiness Engineering & Support (CORES) contract is a planned contract that is envisioned as an alternative or potential replacement to the TIGER contract. As planned, the CORES contract would be a five-year contract with an award potential for all contracts placed under it of up to $780 million.

The Defendants

 

Kerry Khan, who joined the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers in 1994, is a program manager with the Directorate of Contingency Operations, based in Washington, D.C., which administers the TIGER contract. In that position, Kerry Khan had authority, among other things, to place orders for products and services through the TIGER contract, as well as other federal government contracts. He also had authority to certify that the work on the orders had been completed. In addition, Kerry Khan had the responsibility to prepare the CORES contract for solicitation to potential bidders and to approve the solicitation prior to its issuance to potential bidders.

Michael Alexander, who joined the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers in 1985, is a program director with the Directorate of Contingency Operations. In that position, he had authority, among other things, to obtain funding for Army Corps of Engineers projects, including funding for orders placed through the TIGER contract and other federal government contracts. Alexander produced and actively managed a $54 million budget.

Harold Babb is the director of contracts at EyakTek, an Alaska Native-owned small business. EyakTek, based in Dulles, Va., was the prime contractor for the TIGER contract and subcontracted many of the orders from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to other businesses.

Lee Khan controlled a consulting company with his father and took part in numerous activities involving the bribery and kickback scheme.

All four defendants are accused of conspiring to hide the proceeds of their bribery and fraud scheme through a series of financial transactions, including payments to shell companies that were controlled by Kerry Khan and others.

An indictment is merely a formal charge that a defendant has committed a violation of criminal laws and is not evidence of guilt. Every defendant is presumed innocent until, and unless, proven guilty.

Allegations involving the TIGER Contract

According to the indictment, Kerry Khan and Alexander used their official positions at the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, and Babb used his official position at EyakTek, to direct orders through the TIGER contract to a Virginia-based company identified in the indictment as “Company A.” With Kerry Khan’s knowledge and direction, that company’s chief technology officer, an unidentified co-conspirator, submitted fraudulently inflated quotes for work.

Kerry Khan then caused the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to approve and remit payment to EyakTek for these fraudulently inflated invoices. After subtracting its profit margin, EyakTek paid the remainder to “Company A.” The chief technology officer then caused “Company A” to pay part of this money for the benefit of Kerry Khan, his son, and Alexander and Babb.

In addition, Kerry Khan and Alexander caused the Army Corps of Engineers to award contracts directly to “Company A.” Once again, the chief technology officer submitted fraudulent paperwork for inflated costs. Kerry Khan then caused the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to pay “Company A,” and the chief technology officer in turn caused “Company A” to pay a portion of the money for the benefit of Kerry Khan, his son, and Alexander.

In this manner, from 2007 to the present, the chief technology officer caused invoices to be submitted to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, directly and through EyakTek, for total costs of more than $45 million. As directed by Khan, Alexander and Babb, the chief technology officer caused “Company A” to fraudulently inflate its quotes and invoices by about $20 million. The chief technology officer promised and paid the inflated amounts directly and indirectly to Khan, his son, Alexander and Babb.

The indictment alleges that the chief technology officer of “Company A” promised and made payments directly and indirectly to Kerry Khan in excess of $18 million. Among other things, Khan received cash, checks and wire transfers in excess of $5 million; home improvements and renovations for multiple properties; luxury cars for himself, his son and other family members; furnishings, including flat-screen televisions and computer equipment, highend liquor, and other items. Some of this money also went to Lee Khan and a second family member for employment with “Company A.” The promised payments for Kerry Khan included, among others, future payments of $2 million each to three shell companies controlled by him.

The payments to Kerry Khan came in large amounts, including a $1.2 million wire transfer from “Company A” to a Khan-controlled entity in August 2008 and a check for $3.3 million from “Company A” to a Khan controlled entity in February 2010. According to the indictment, Kerry Khan and his son together channeled $383,000 on Sept. 1, 2011 to another family member who had threatened to alert law enforcement authorities to the existence of the scheme.

The indictment alleges that the chief technology officer of “Company A” promised and made payments directly and indirectly to Alexander in excess of $1 million. Among other things, Alexander received more than $185,000 in cash and checks, a $21,000 Cartier watch, first-class airline tickets, and other items. The promises called for Alexander to secure future employment at “Company A.” In addition, the chief technology officer of “Company A” provided about $1 million for the purchase of a coffee shop for an associate of Alexander’s in South Korea.

According to the indictment, the chief technology officer of “Company A” promised and made payments directly and indirectly to Babb in excess of $700,000. Among other things, he received cash and checks, first-class airline tickets and promised future employment at the firm.

Allegations involving the CORES Contract

The indictment alleges that Kerry Khan, Alexander and Babb worked with the chief technology officer and others at “Company A” to devise a scheme to steer the award of the CORES contract to “Company A.” The intent was to use this contract as a way for “Company A” to funnel money and other things of value directly and indirectly to Khan, Alexander, Babb and others. Kerry Khan, Babb, the chief technology officer, and others at “Company A” worked on a statement of objectives and work for the CORES contract with the intent of tailoring it to fit “Company A” and interfere with the fairness of the bidding process. Kerry Khan, Alexander and Babb also planned to install certain employees from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to serve on the selection board to insure that “Company A” was awarded the valuable CORES contract.

**

This case was investigated by the FBI’s Washington Field Office; the Office of the Inspector General for the Small Business Administration; the Department of Defense’s Defense Criminal Investigative Service; the Defense Contract Audit Agency; the Washington Field Office of the Internal Revenue Service-Criminal Investigation, and the Army Criminal Investigation Command.

It is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorneys Michael Atkinson and Bryan Seeley of the Fraud and Public Corruption Section and Assistant U.S. Attorney Anthony Saler and Special Assistant U.S. Attorney Christopher Dana of the Asset Forfeiture and Money Laundering Section, with assistance from Assistant U.S. Attorneys Mary Chris Dobbie and Jonathan Hooks. Assistance also was provided by Forensic Accountant Maria Boodoo; Legal Assistants Jared Forney, Krishawn Graham, Jessica McCormick, and Nicole Wattelet; and Paralegal Specialists Tasha Harris, Shanna Hays, Taryn McLaughlin, and Sarah Reis.

FAZ ÜBER DIE NEO-STASI “GoMoPa” UND DEREN EINSCHLÄGIG BEKANNTE “PARTNER” “GERD BENNEWIRTZ” UND “PETER EHLERS”

http://www.faz.net/artikel/C30350/wirtschaftskriminalitaet-grossrazzia-wegen-verdachts-auf-insiderhandel-30309286.html

DAS BETRUGSURTEIL GEGEN “BENNEWIRTZ” UND “PETER EHLERS” “GoMoPa”-PARTNER “MAURISCHAT” UND “VORNKAHL” WG BETRUGES AM EIGEN ANLEGER

http://www.immobilien-vertraulich.com/law/7273-der-beweis-betrugs-urteil-gegengomopa-maurischat-betrug-am-eigenen-anleger-wg–10000-.html

“DUBIOSE DOPPELROLLE” – SPIEGEL ÜBER “GoMoPa”-Gründer STASI-Oberst Stelzer und mutmasslichen “GoMoPa”-Boss Resch

http://www.spiegel.de/spiegel/print/d-65717414.html

DUBIOS ! DUBIOS ! DUBIOS !

Anscheinend inspiriert das Wort “Dubios” die fingierte “GoMoPa”…

Süddeutsche Zeitung über die kriminellen Machenschaften der “GoMoPa”

SZ_03.09.2010_Am_virtuellen_Pranger

SPIEGEL über die Giftstudie des “GoMoPa”-Masterminds und Resch-Protege´s STASI-Oberst Ehrenfried Stelzer

http://www.spiegel.de/spiegel/print/d-13395385.html

DIE GIFTSTUDIE “TOXDAT” DES RESCH-PROTEGE´S STASI-OBERST EHRENFRIED STELZER

http://www.immobilien-vertraulich.com/law/7279-die-killer-bibel-toxdat–die-900-seiten-stasi-mordstudie-von-gomopa-mastermind-ehrenfried-stelzer.html

SPIEGEL über die STASI-Connection des mutmasslichen “GoMoPa”-Chefs Jochen Resch

http://www.spiegel.de/spiegel/print/d-65717414.html

Meridian Capital über die STASI-FÄLSCHUNGEN DER “GoMoPa”

http://meridiancapital.wordpress.com/

Gastbeitrag: WIE AUCH SIE “GoMoPa”-Rufmordopfer werden können


hacker Presse Info: Wie Auch Sie GoMoPa STASI Rufmordopfer werden können

Liebe Leserin, lieber Leser!

Stellen Sie sich bitte kurz vor, dass Sie mit einer tollen Geschäftsidee oder einer Geschäftserweiterung zu mehr Geld kommen möchten. Beispielsweise auch Ihr Unternehmen vergrössern oder gar Ihre Waren exportieren wollen.

Sie werben damit natürlich über die Medien….

Da meldet sich bei Ihnen möglicherweise ein Beauftragter des Finanz-Nachrichtendienstes GoMoPamit der Mitteilung, dass im GoMoPa-Forum sehr negative Forenbeiträge über Ihre Person oder Ihr Vorhaben stünden. Äusserst Schlimmes wir über Sie berichtet. Zum Beispiel, dass Sie bisher schonIhr Geld mit betrügerischen Machenschaften verdient hätten oder Ihr Sohn als erfolgreicher Sportler nach neuesten Ermittlungen in einem Kokain-Dealer-Ring verwickelt sei.

Ein anonymer User ( Schreiberling) habe dies geschrieben, wird vom GoMoPa-Beauftragten berichtet. Man könne jetzt noch nicht feststellen, ob dies so wahr sei. Man könne aber auch nicht den Beitrag einfach rausnehmen, denn es könne ja auch was Wahres daran sein!

Falls Sie selbst an der Wahrheitsfindung interessiert seien, könnten Sie auch beim ´seriösen Nachrichtendienst` GoMoPa als Gesellschafter oder als Premium-Mitglied einsteigen, dann könne man ja…..usf. …ganz einfach den Beitrag herausnehmen!

So ähnlich könnte es geschehen und glauben Sie mir: ´Dies ist kein böser Traum,-keine Fata Morgana`, sondern schon Zigtausendmal in der fast 10-Jährigen GoMoPa- Geschichte so abgelaufen.

Wir, von der CSA-Agency, wurden selbst aus Wettbewerbsgründen seit 2002 von GoMoPa auf primitivste Weise im Forum diffamiert oder die von uns als seriöse Dienstleister empfohlenen Unternehmungen wurden per Rufmord mit schmutzigsten, unwahren Verleumdungs-Attacken vonanonymen Bloggern ( bezahlte Helfershelfer vom GoMoPa) nahezu ruiniert. Nicht nur finanziell , sondern auch gesundheitlich nieder gemacht! Nicht umsonst heisst es RUFMORD.

Der Begriff ´Stalking` ist da noch eine vornehme Bezeichnung.

Auf gut deutsch passt Rufmord besser.

Geschäftlicher und gesundheitlicher RUFMORD gehört auch entsprechend bestraft.

Die Justiz tut sich sehr schwer damit. Vor allem, wenn die Rufmörder mit Ihren Machenschaften mit Gesellschaften wie z.B. ´GoMoPa` als Briefkastenfirma aus dem Ausland agieren. UND zum anderen, weil sich die Stalking-Terror-Experten von GoMoPa sich mit ihren Methoden auch der Justiz und der Medien bedienen.

TOP-SECRET-Smithwick tribunal told spymasters could have averted double murder

A written statement that claims up to a quarter of the IRA gang involved in the killing of two top Ulster policemen were British agents has been handed to a tribunal investigating collusion between terrorists and the security forces during the Northern Ireland Troubles.

The document handed to the Smithwick tribunal by a former British military intelligence officer, shines new light on Ulster’s covert war — and raises concerns that the murder of Superintendent Bob Buchanan and Chief Superintendent Harry Breen in March 1989 could have been prevented.

The material, given to the tribunal by Ian Hurst, a former member of the force research unit (FRU), claims that one of Britain’s most important agents in the IRA, codenamed Stakeknife, was aware of the murder plot, prompting accusations that in turn his spy bosses failed to inform either the Royal Ulster Constabulary or the Garda Síochána about it.

In his 24-page statement, passed to the tribunal headed by Judge Peter Smithwick in June, Hurst claims that Stakeknife — FRU informer Freddie Scappaticci — played a key role in intelligence-gathering that led to the double murder. Yet Scappaticci, the then head of the IRA’s spy-catching unit, was in fact a top British agent in the Provisionals. …

Another FRU agent and one-time IRA member known as Kevin Fulton has claimed state agents involved in the ambush killed the two police officers to prevent them being handed over to a Provisional interrogation unit, with the danger of them leaking the names of informants under torture.

The Guardian has learned that the Smithwick tribunal has asked Hurst to give his evidence in private. But Hurst is understood to insist that he will only speak in public about the Breen-Buchanan double murder and the role of state agents in the IRA.

It is understood Hurst may be considering legal action to challenge the tribunal’s decision. He has an Irish passport, holds Irish citizenship due to marriage and could argue that the ruling to force him to give evidence in camera is a breach of the Republic’s constitution and his right to give evidence openly to a legally constituted inquiry.

Opfer: VON RUFMÖRDERN u. Serienbetrügern erfundene “GoMoPa-SJB”: “Wer stoppt Rufmorde ?”

http://www.victims-opfer.com/?p=16359

Magisterarbeit Bernd Pulch an der Universität Mainz

http://www.kepplinger.de/node/50

FAZ ÜBER CYBERSTALKER A LA GoMoPa- MUTMASSLICHE PARTNER VON “GERD BENNEWIRTZ” UND “PETER EHLERS”

http://www.faz.net/s/Rub77CAECAE94D7431F9EACD163751D4CF/Doc~E70F3E028C8E542D9B0AD6B2A8B1179C3~ATpl~Ecommon~Scontent.html

Börse Online über “GoMoPa”-Betrüger und RA Jochen Resch

http://www.graumarktinfo.de/gm/aktuell/diskussion/:Gomopa–Anwaelte-als-Finanzierungsquelle/616477.html

DER BEWEIS – 2000: “INVESTMENT” entsteht auch in Deutschland – da hiess es bei Ehlers noch “Der Fonds”

https://berndpulch.org/2011/05/23/der-beweis-aus-dem-jahr-2000-so-regte-gruner-jahr-tochter-ipv-mich-an-den-titel-investment-zu-lancieren/

DIE SÜDDEUTSCHE ZEITUNG ÜBER DIE VERBRECHER DER STASI-“GoMoPa”

SZ_03.09.2010_Am_virtuellen_Pranger

DIE DEUTSCHE PRESSE ÜBER DIE KINDER-SEXUALAUFKLÄRER DER “GoMoPa” UND DEREN MUTMASSLICHE “PARTNER GERD BENNEWIRTZ UND PETER EHLERS”

Presseberichterstatung-zu-Maurischat1

 

 

 

DIE ORGANISIERTE STASI-“GoMoPa”-KRIMINALIÄT: DER BEWEIS: “GoMoPa”-ERPRESST MERIDIAN CAPITAL “GoMoPa”-CEO MAURISCHT WIRD VOM BKA VERHAFTET

Millionen Finanzierungen mit Widersprüchen / Die Werbemethoden der Meridian Capital Enterprises

ORIGINAL ARTIKEL GOMOPA 2

ORIGINAL ARTIKEL GOMOPA

ZUM DOWNLOAD OBEN CLICKEN

Berlin (ots) – Die Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. bietet auf ihren Webseiten weltweite Finanzierungen an. GoMoPa hat die dort gemachten Angaben analysiert und starke Widersprüche entdeckt.

Die Unternehmensstruktur

Die Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. behauptet “ein Finanzinstitut” zu sein, “das zu einer internationalen Finanzgruppe gehört.” Diese Gruppe setze sich aus 11 verschiedenen Mitgliedern zusammen. GoMoPa fragte alle zuständigen Handelsregister ab. Ergebnis: 5 der 11 angegebenen Finanzinstitute sind nicht eingetragen.

Mitarbeiter der KLP Group Emirates, GoMoPa-Partner und Management-Gruppe in Dubai, machten sich die Mühe, drei weitere Geschäftsadressen der Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. zu überprüfen. Martin Kraeter, Prinzipal der KLP Group: “Alle 3 genannten Firmen existieren hier nicht, auch nicht in abgewandelter Form.”

Das Unternehmen will weltweit über zahlreiche Standorte verfügen. Bei denen handelt es sich allerdings lediglich um “Virtual Offices” eines Büroservice-Anbieters.

Laut Firmenhomepage hat das Unternehmen seinen “rechtlichen Geschäftssitz” in Dubai. In einem GoMoPa vorliegenden Schreiben der Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. heißt es jedoch, der Firmensitz sei in London. Auf der Homepage selbst tauchen zwei Londoner Adressen auf, die das Unternehmen als “Kundenabteilung für deutschsprachige Kunden” und “Abteilung der Zusammenarbeit mit Investoren” bezeichnet.

Die Meridian Capital Enterprises ist tatsächlich als “Limited” (Ltd.) mit Sitz in England und Wales eingetragen. Eine Abfrage beim Gewerbeamt Dubais (DED) zur Firmierung jedoch bleibt ergebnislos. Bemerkenswert ist auch der vermeintliche Sitz in Israel. Auf der Webseite von Meridian Capital Enterprises heißt es: “Die Firma Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. ist im Register des israelischen Justizministeriums unter der Nummer 514108471 (…) angemeldet.” Martin Kraeter hierzu: ” Ein ‘britisch-arabisch-israelisches bankfremdes Finanzinstitut sein zu wollen, wie die Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. es darstellt, ist mehr als zweifelhaft. Es würde keinem einzigen Emirati, geschweige denn einem ‘Scheich’, auch nur im Traum einfallen Geschäfte mit Personen oder Firmen aus Israel zu machen. ”

Eigenartig ist auch: Zwei angebliche Großinvestitionen der Meridian Capital Enterprises in Dubai sind Investmentruinen bzw. erst gar nicht realisierte Projekte.

Der Aktivitätsstatus der Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. ist laut englischem Handelsregister als “dormant” gemeldet. Auf der Grundlage des britischen Gesellschaftsrechts können sich eingetragene Unternehmen selbst “dormant” (schlafend) melden, wenn sie keine oder nur unwesentliche buchhalterisch zu erfassende Transaktionen vorgenommen haben. Angesichts der angeblichen globalen Investitionstätigkeit der Meridian Capital Ltd. ist dieses jedoch sehr erstaunlich.

Auf ihrer Webseite gibt die Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. einen Überblick über ihre größten Investitionen in Deutschland: “Dithmarschen Wind Powerplant, Waldpolenz Solar Park, AIDAdiva, Berlin Hauptbahnhof, Sony Center”. Die Eigentümer des Sony Centers am Potsdamer Platz teilten GoMoPA mit, dass ihnen sei ein solcher Investor unbekannt sei. Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. will übrigens angeblich auch in die Erweiterung des Panama-Kanals sowie in das Olympiastadion in Peking investiert haben.

Der Webauftritt

Die Internetseite der MCE ist aufwendig gestaltet. Bei näherer Betrachtung fällt jedoch auf, dass es sich bei zahlreichen Fotos der Veranstaltungen der Meridian Capital Enterprises in den meisten Fällen um Bildmaterial von Online-Zeitungen oder frei zugänglichen Medienfotos einzelner Institutionen handelt.

Auf der Homepage befinden sich Videofilme, die eine verblüffende Ähnlichkeit mit dem Werbematerial von NAKHEEL aufweisen, dem größten Bauträger der Vereinigten Arabischen Emirate. Den schillernden Videos über die berühmten drei Dubai Palmen wurden offensichtlich selbstproduzierte Trailersequenzen der Meridian Capital Enterprises vorangestellt.

Ab einem Volumen von 10 Millionen Euro oder höher präsentiert sich so die Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. als der passende Investitionspartner. Auf der Internetseite sind diverse Fotos mit Scheichs an Konferenztischen zu sehen. Doch diese großen Tagungen und großen Kongresse der Meridian Capital Enterprises werden in den Pressearchiven der lokalen Presse Dubais mit keinem Wort erwähnt.

Vertiefende Information unter:

http://www.presseportal.de/go2/mehr_zu_MCE_ltd

Originaltext: GoMoPa GmbH Digitale Pressemappe: http://www.presseportal.de/pm/72697 Pressemappe via RSS : http://www.presseportal.de/rss/pm_72697.rss2

Pressekontakt: Herr Friedrich Wasserburg Telefon: +49 (30) 51060992 Fax: +49 (30) 51060994 Zuständigkeitsbereich: Presse

Firmeninfo Goldman Morgenstern & Partners LLC 575 Madison Avenue USA-10022 – 2511 New York http://www.gomopa.net

Über Goldman Morgenstern & Partners LLC: Ein Zusammenschluss aus Unternehmens-, Steuer-, Anlageberatern und Rechtsanwälten.
© 2008 news aktuell

DANN GING DIe ERPRESSUNG LOS UND MERIDIAN CAPITAL REAGIERTE – STATT DIES ABER ZUZUGEBEN SETZEN DIE STASI-VERBRECHER EINE GEFÄLSCHTE PRESSE-MITTEILUNG IN NETZ, DIE MICH BELASTEN SOLL

BITTE KONTAKTIEREN SIE AUCH MERIDIAN CAPITAL

sales@meridiancapital.com

1 Battery Park Plaza
New York, NY 10004
TEL: 212-972-3600
FAX: 212-612-0100

TOP-SECRET: THE GERMAN ORGANIZED CRIME FAMILY “GoMoPa” AND THEIR FOUNDERS THE STASI

The German Organized Crime Family known by the name of “GoMoPa” is in association with the SJB, Neuss Rhineland, “GoMoPa” is as shortened version of their bogus name “Goldman, Morgenstern and Partner”

They are the heirs of the former Organized Crime Familiy in Germany – the STASI.

Here are the most important facts;

The Ministry for State Security (German: Ministerium für Staatssicherheit (MfS), commonly known as the Stasi (IPA: [ˈʃtaziː]) (abbreviation GermanStaatssicherheit, literally State Security), was the official state security service of East Germany. The MfS was headquartered in East Berlin, with an extensive complex in Berlin-Lichtenberg and several smaller facilities throughout the city. It was widely regarded as one of the most effective and repressive intelligence and secret police agencies in the world. The MfS motto was “Schild und Schwert der Partei” (Shield and Sword of the Party), that is the ruling Socialist Unity Party of Germany (SED).

Ministerium für Staatssicherheit
Emblema Stasi.svg
Seal of the Ministry of State Security of the GDR
Agency overview
Formed February 9, 1950[1]
Dissolved October 4, 1990 (End of GDR)
Headquarters East BerlinGDR
Employees 68,000

Creation of the Stasi

The MfS was founded on 8 February 1950[citation needed]. It was modeled on the Soviet MGB[citation needed], and was regarded by the Soviet Union as an extremely loyal and effective partner[citation needed]Wilhelm Zaisser was the first Minister of State Security of the GDR, and Erich Mielke his deputy. Zaisser, who tried to depose SED General Secretary Walter Ulbricht after the June 1953 uprising[2] was after this removed by Ulbricht and replaced by Ernst Wollweber. Wollweber resigned in 1957 after clashes with Ulbricht and Erich Honecker, and was succeeded by his deputy, Erich Mielke.

Early on the Stasi waged a campaign against Jews, who were already subject to widespread discrimination and violence in the Soviet Union. The Stasi censored the fact that Jews had been victims during the previous regime and in one instance, took gold from the bodies of Jews. The Stasi labeled Jews as capitalists and criminals.[3][4] Gypsies were also blamed in the Stasi propaganda.[5]

In 1957, Markus Wolf became head of the Hauptverwaltung Aufklärung (HVA) (General Reconnaissance Administration), its foreign intelligence section. As intelligence chief, Wolf achieved great success in penetrating the government, political and business circles of West Germany with spies. The most influential case was that of Günter Guillaume which led to the downfall of West German Chancellor Willy Brandt in May 1974. In 1986, Wolf retired and was succeeded by Werner Grossmann.

[edit]Relationship with the KGB

Although Mielke’s Stasi was superficially granted independence in 1957, until 1990 the KGB continued to maintain liaison officers in all eight main Stasi directorates, each with his own office inside the Stasi’s Berlin compound, and in each of the fifteen Stasi district headquarters around East Germany.[6] Collaboration was so close that the KGB invited the Stasi to establish operational bases in Moscow and Leningrad to monitor visiting East German tourists and Mielke referred to the Stasi officers as “Chekists of the Soviet Union.”[6] In 1978, Mielke formally granted KGB officers in East Germany the same rights and powers they enjoyed in the Soviet Union.[6]

Organization

The Ministry for State Security also included the following entities:

  • Main Administration for Reconnaissance: focused its efforts primarily upon West Germany and the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, but it also operated East German intelligence in all foreign countries.
  • Main Coordinating Administration of the Ministry for State Security:coordinated its work with Soviet intelligence agencies.
  • Main Department for Communications Security and Personnel Protection: provided personal security for the national leadership and maintained and operated an internal secure communications system for the government.
  • Administration for Security of Heavy Industry and Research and Main Administration for Security of the Economy: protection against sabotage or espionage.
  • Main Administration for Struggle Against Suspicious Persons: was charged with the surveillance of foreigners — particularly from the West — legally traveling or residing within the country. This included the diplomatic community, tourists, and official guests.
  • Division of Garbage Analysis: was responsible for analyzing garbage for any suspect western foods and/or materials.
  • Administration 12: was responsible for the surveillance of mail and telephone communications.
  • Administration 2000: was responsible for the reliability of National People’s Army (NVA) personnel. Admin 2000 operated a secret, unofficial network of informants within the NVA.
  • Penal System: to facilitate its mission of enforcing the political security of East Germany, the Stasi operated its own penal system, distinct from that of the Ministry of the Interior. This system comprised prison camps for political, as opposed to criminal, offenders.
  • Felix Dzerzhinsky Guards Regiment: the armed force at disposal of the ministry, named for the founder of the Cheka, the Bolshevik secret police. The members of this regiment, who served at least 3 years, were responsible for protecting high government and party buildings and personnel. The regiment was composed of six motorized rifle battalions, one artillery battalion, and one training battalion. Its equipment included PSZH-IV armored personnel carriers, 120mm mortars, 85mm and 100mm antitank guns, ZU-23 antiaircraft guns, and helicopters. A Swiss source reported in 1986 that the troops of the Ministry of State Security also had commando units similar to the Soviet Union’s Spetsnaz forces. These East German units were said to wear the uniform of the airborne troops, although with the violet collar patch of the Ministry for State Security rather than the orange one of paratroopers. They also wore the sleeve stripe of the Felix Dzerzhinsky Guards Regiment.[7]

Stasi operations

Further information: Eastern Bloc politics

Personnel

Between 1950 and 1989, the Stasi employed a total of 274,000 people in an effort to root out the class enemy.[8][9] In 1989, the Stasi employed 91,015 persons full time, including 2,000 fully employed unofficial collaborators, 13,073 soldiers and 2,232 officers of GDR army,[10] along with 173,081 unofficial informants inside GDR[11] and 1,553 informants in West Germany.[12] In terms of the identity of inoffizielle Mitarbeiter(IMs) Stasi informants, by 1995, 174,000 had been identified, which approximated 2.5% of East Germany’s population between the ages of 18 and 60.[8] 10,000 IMs were under 18 years of age.[8]

While these calculations were from official records, according to the federal commissioner in charge of the Stasi archives in Berlin, because many such records were destroyed, there were likely closer to 500,000 Stasi informers.[8] A former Stasi colonel who served in the counterintelligence directorate estimated that the figure could be as high as 2 million if occasional informants were included.[8]

Infiltration

Full-time officers were posted to all major industrial plants (the extensiveness of any surveillance largely depended on how valuable a product was to the economy)[9] and one tenant in every apartment building was designated as a watchdog reporting to an area representative of the Volkspolizei (Vopo).[13] Spies reported every relative or friend who stayed the night at another’s apartment.[13] Tiny holes were drilled in apartment and hotel room walls through which Stasi agents filmed citizens with special video cameras.[13] Schools, universities, and hospitals were extensively infiltrated.[13]

The Stasi had formal categorizations of each type of informant, and had official guidelines on how to extract information from, and control, those who they came into contact with.[14] The roles of informants ranged from those already in some way involved in state security (such as the police and the armed services) to those in the dissident movements (such as in the arts and the Protestant Church).[15] Information gathered about the latter groups was frequently used to divide or discredit members.[16] Informants were made to feel important, given material or social incentives, and were imbued with a sense of adventure, and only around 7.7%, according to official figures, were coerced into cooperating. A significant proportion of those informing were members of the SED; to employ some form of blackmail, however, was not uncommon.[15] A large number of Stasi informants were trolley conductors, janitors, doctors, nurses and teachers; Mielke believed the best informants were those whose jobs entailed frequent contact with the public.[17]

The Stasi’s ranks swelled considerably after Eastern Bloc countries signed the 1975 Helsinki accords, which Erich Honecker viewed as a grave threat to his regime because they contained language binding signatories to respect “human and basic rights, including freedom of thought, conscience, religion, and conviction.”[18] The number of IMs peaked at around 180,000 in this year, having slowly risen from 20,000–30,000 in the early 1950s, and reaching 100,000 for the first time in 1968, in response to Ostpolitik and protests worldwide.[19] The Stasi also acted as a proxy for KGB to conduct activities in other Eastern Bloc countries, such as Poland, where the Soviets were despised.[20]

The MfS infiltrated almost every aspect of GDR life. In the mid-1980s, a network of IMs began growing in both German states; by the time East Germany collapsed in 1989, the MfS employed 91,015 employees and 173,081 informants.[21] About one of every 63 East Germans collaborated with the MfS—one of the most extensive police infiltrations of a society in history. In 2007 an article in BBC stated that “Some calculations have concluded that in East Germany there was one informer to every seven citizens.”[22] Additionally, MfS agents infiltrated and undermined West Germany’s government and spy agencies.

In an extreme case, Stasi informant Knud Wollenberger (code name Daniel) married civil rights and peace activist Vera Lengsfeld specifically to keep a watch on her.[17]

Executions of dissidents

People were imprisoned for such reasons as trying to leave the country, or telling political jokes. Prisoners were kept, isolated and disoriented, knowing nothing of what was going on in the outside world.[23]

After the mid-1950s, Stasi executions were carried out in strict secrecy, and were usually accomplished with a guillotine and, in later years, by a single pistol shot to the neck.[24] In most instances, the relatives of the executed were not informed of either the sentence or the execution.[24]

After the Berlin Wall fell, X-ray machines were found in the prisons. Indeed, three of the best-known dissidents died within a few months of each other, of similar rare forms of leukaemia. Survivors state that the MfS intentionally irradiated political prisoners with high-dose radiation, possibly to provoke cancer in them.[23]International operations

International operations

Other files (the Rosenholz Files), which contained the names of East German spies abroad, led American spy agencies to capture them. After German reunification, it was revealed that the MfS had secretly aided left-wing terrorists such as the Red Army Faction, even though no part of the RAF had ever been ideologically aligned with the GDR.

Directorate X was responsible for disinformation. Rolf Wagenbreth, director of disinformation operations, stated “Our friends in Moscow call it ‘dezinformatsiya’. Our enemies in America call it ‘active measures,’ and I, dear friends, call it ‘my favorite pastime'”.

Examples

  • Stasi experts helped to build the secret police of Mengistu Haile Mariam in Ethiopia.[25][26]
  • Fidel Castro‘s regime in Cuba was particularly interested in receiving training from Stasi. Stasi instructors worked in Cuba and Cuban communists received training in East Germany.[27] The Stasi chief Markus Wolf described how he set up the Cuban system on the pattern of the East German system.[28]
  • The Stasi’s experts worked with building secret police systems in the People’s Republic of Angola, the People’s Republic of Mozambique, and the People’s Republic of Yemen (South Yemen).[26]
  • Stasi experts helped to set up Idi Amin‘s secret police.[29][26]
  • Stasi organized, trained, indoctrinated Syrian intelligence services.[30]
  • Stasi experts helped Kwame Nkrumah to build his secret police. When Ghanians overthrew the regime, Stasi Major Jurgen Rogalla was imprisoned.[31][26]
  • The Stasi sent agents to the West as sleeper agents. For instance, sleeper agent Günter Guillaume became a senior aide to social democratic chancellor Willy Brandt, and reported about his politics and private life.[32]
  • The Stasi operated at least one brothel. Agents were used against both men and women working in Western governments. “Entrapment” was used against married men and homosexuals.[33]
  • Martin Schlaff—According to the German parliament’s investigations, the Austrian billionaire’s Stasi codename was “Landgraf” and registration number “3886-86”. He made money by supplying embargoed goods to East Germany.[34]
  • Sokratis Kokkalis—Stasi documents suggest that the Greek businessman was a Stasi agent, whose operations included delivering Western technological secrets and bribing Greek officials to buy outdated East German telecom equipment.[35]
  • Red Army Faction (Baader-Meinhof Group)—A terrorist organization which killed dozens of West Germans and others.
  • The Stasi ordered a campaign in which cemeteries and other Jewish sites in West Germany were smeared with swastikas and other Nazi symbols. Funds were channelled to a small West German group for it to defend Adolf Eichmann.[36]
  • The Stasi channelled large amounts of money to Neo-Nazi groups in West, with the purpose of discrediting the West.[37]
  • The Stasi worked in a campaign to create extensive material and propaganda against Israel.[38]
  • Murder of Benno Ohnesorg—A Stasi agent carried out the murder, which stirred a whole movement of left-wing protest and violence. The Economist describes it as “the gunshot that hoaxed a generation”.[39][40]
  • Operation Infektion—The Stasi helped the KGB to spread HIV/AIDS disinformation that the United States had created the disease. Millions of people around the world still believe in these claims.[41][42]
  • Sandoz chemical spill—The KGB reportedly ordered the Stasi to sabotage the chemical factory to distract attention from the Chernobyl disaster six months earlier in Ukraine.[43][44][45]
  • Investigators have found evidence of a death squad that carried out a number of assassinations (including assassination of Swedish journalist Cats Falck) on orders from the East German government from 1976 to 1987. Attempts to prosecute members failed.[46][47][48]
  • The Stasi attempted to assassinate Wolfgang Welsch, a famous critic of the regime. Stasi collaborator Peter Haack (Stasi codename “Alfons”) befriended with Welsch and then fed him with hamburgers that were poisoned with thallium. It took weeks for doctors to find out why Haack had suddenly lost his hair.[49]
  • Documents in the Stasi archives state that the KGB ordered Bulgarian agents to assassinate Pope John Paul II, who was known for his criticism of human rights in the communist block, and the Stasi was asked to help with covering up traces.[50]
  • A special unit of the Stasi assisted Romanian intelligence in kidnapping Romanian dissident Oliviu Beldeanu from West Germany.[51]
  • In 1975 Stasi recorded a conversation between senior West German CDU politicians Helmut Kohl and Kurt Biedenkopf. It was then “leaked” to the Stern magazine as a transcript recorded by American intelligence. The magazine then claimed that Americans were wiretapping West Germans and the public believed the story.[52]
This list is incomplete; you can help by expanding it.

Fall of Communism

Recruitment of informants became increasingly difficult towards the end of the GDR’s existence, and after 1986, there was a negative turnover rate of IMs. This had a significant impact on the Stasi’s ability to survey the population, in a period of growing unrest, and knowledge of the MfS’s activities became more widespread.[53] The Stasi had been tasked during this period with preventing the country’s economic difficulties becoming a political problem, through suppression of the very worst problems the state faced, but it failed to do so.[9]

Stasi officers reportedly had discussed rebranding East Germany as a democratic capitalist country to the West, but which would be in practice taken over by Stasi officers. The plan specified 2,587 OibE officers who would take over power (Offiziere im besonderen Einsatz, “officers on special assignment”) and it was registered as Top Secret Document 0008-6/86 of March 17, 1986.[54][55] According to Ion Mihai Pacepa, the chief intelligence officer in communist Romania, other communist intelligence services had similar plans.[55] On 12 March 1990 Der Spiegel reported that the Stasi was indeed attempting to implement 0008-6/86.[54]Pacepa has noted that what happened in Russia and how KGB Colonel Vladimir Putin took over Russia resembles these plans.[55] See Putinism.

On 7 November 1989, in response to the rapidly changing political and social situation in the GDR in late 1989, Erich Mielke resigned. On 17 November 1989, the Council of Ministers (Ministerrat der DDR) renamed the MfS as the “Office for National Security” (Amt für Nationale Sicherheit – AfNS), which was headed by Generalleutnant Wolfgang Schwanitz. On 8 December 1989, GDR Prime Minister Hans Modrow directed the dissolution of the AfNS, which was confirmed by a decision of the Ministerrat on 14 December 1989.

As part of this decision, the Ministerrat originally called for the evolution of the AfNS into two separate organizations: a new foreign intelligence service (Nachrichtendienst der DDR) and an “Office for the Protection of the Constitution of the GDR” (Verfassungsschutz der DDR), along the lines of the West German Bundesamt für Verfassungsschutz, however, the public reaction was extremely negative, and under pressure from the “Round Table” (Runder Tisch), the government dropped the creation of the Verfassungsschutz der DDR and directed the immediate dissolution of the AfNS on 13 January 1990. Certain functions of the AfNS reasonably related to law enforcement were handed over to the GDR Ministry of Internal Affairs. The same ministry also took guardianship of remaining AfNS facilities.

When the parliament of Germany investigated public funds that disappeared after the Fall of the Berlin Wall, it found out that East Germany had transferred large amounts of money to Martin Schlaff through accounts in Vaduz, the capital of Liechtenstein, in return for goods “under Western embargo”. Moreover, high-ranking Stasi officers continued their post-DDR careers in management positions in Schlaff’s group of companies. For example, in 1990 Herbert Kohler, Stasi commander in Dresden, transferred 170 million marks to Schlaff for “harddisks” and months later went to work for him.[34][56] The investigations concluded that “Schlaff’s empire of companies played a crucial role” in the Stasi attempts to secure the financial future of Stasi agents and keep the intelligence network alive.[34] The Stern magazine noted that KGB officerVladimir Putin worked with his Stasi colleagues in Dresden in 1989.[56]

In the Soviet Union, about 50 billion U.S. dollars was transferred out of the country (see FIMACO).

Recovery of the Stasi files

During the Peaceful Revolution of 1989, MfS offices were overrun by enraged citizens, but not before the MfS destroyed a number of documents (approximately 5%).[57]

Storming the Stasi headquarters

As the GDR began to fall, the Stasi did as well. They began to destroy the extensive files that they had kept, both by hand and with the use of shredders.

Citizens protesting and entering the Stasi building in Berlin; the sign accuses the Stasi and SED of being Nazistic dictators.

When these activities became known, protest erupted in front of the Stasi headquarters.[58] In the evening of 15 January 1990, a large crowd of people formed outside the gates in order to stop the destruction of personal files. In their minds, this information should have been available to them and also have been used to punish those who had taken part in Stasi actions. The large group of protesters grew and grew until they were able to overcome the police and gain entry into the complex. The protestors became violent and destructive as they smashed doors and windows, threw furniture, and trampled portraits of Erich Honecker, leader of the GDR. Among the destructive public were officers working for the West German government, as well as former MfS collaborators seeking to destroy documents. One explanation postulated as to why the Stasi did not open fire was for fear of hitting their own colleagues. As the people continued their violence, these undercover men proceeded into the file room and acquired many files that would become of great importance to catching ex-Stasi members.

Controversy of the Stasi files

With the German Reunification on 3 October 1990 a new government agency was founded called the Office of the Federal Commissioner Preserving the Records of the Ministry for State Security of the GDR (BStU).[59] There was a debate about what should happen to the files, whether they should be opened to the people or kept closed.

Those who opposed opening the files cited privacy as a reason. They felt that the information in the files would lead to negative feelings about former Stasi members, and, in turn, cause violence. Pastor Rainer Eppelmann, who became Minister of Defense and Disarmament after March 1990, felt that new political freedoms for former Stasi members would be jeopardized by acts of revenge. Prime Minister Lothar de Maiziere even went so far as to predict murder. They also argued against the use of the files to capture former Stasi members and prosecute them, arguing that not all former members were criminals and should not be punished solely for being a member. There were also some who believed that everyone was guilty of something. Peter Michael Diestel, the Minister of Interior, opined that these files could not be used to determine innocence and guilt, claiming that “there were only two types of individuals who were truly innocent in this system, the newborn and the alcoholic.” Other opinions, such as the one of West German Interior Minister Wolfgang Schäuble, believed in putting the Stasi behind them and working on German reunification.

Others argued that everyone should have the right to see their own file, and that the files should be opened to investigate former Stasi members and prosecute them, as well as not allow them to hold office. Opening the files would also help clear up some of the rumors that were floating around. Some also believed that politicians involved with the Stasi should be investigated.

The fate of the files was finally decided under the Unification Treaty between the GDR and Federal Republic of Germany (FRG). This treaty took the Volkskammer law further and allowed more access and use of the files. Along with the decision to keep the files in a central location in the East, they also decided who could see and use the files, allowing people to see their own files.

In 1992, following a declassification ruling by the German government, the MfS files were opened, leading people to look for their files. Timothy Garton Ash, an English historian, after reading his file, wrote The File: A Personal History while completing his dissertation research in East Berlin.[60]

Between 1991 and 2011, around 2.75 million individuals, mostly GDR citizens, requested to see their own files.[61] The ruling also gave people the ability to make duplicates of their documents. Another big issue was how the media could use and benefit from the documents. It was decided that the media could obtain files as long as they were depersonalized and not regarding an individual under the age of 18 or a former Stasi member. This ruling not only gave the media access to the files, but also gave schools access.

Tracking down former Stasi informers with the files

Even though groups of this sort were active in the community, those who were tracking down ex-members were, as well. Many of these hunters succeeded in catching ex-Stasi; however, charges could not be made for merely being a member. The person in question would have had to participate in an illegal act, not just be a registered Stasi member. Among the high-profile individuals who were arrested and tried were Erich Mielke, Third Minister of State Security of the GDR, and Erich Honecker, head of state for the GDR. Mielke was given six years for the murder of two policemen in 1931. Honecker was charged with authorizing the killing of would-be escapees on the East-West frontier and the Berlin Wall. During his trial, he went through cancer treatment. Due to the fact that he was nearing death, Honecker was allowed to spend his final time in Chile. He died in May 1994.]Reassembling the destroyed files

Document shredding is described in Stasiland. Some of it is very easy due to the amount of archives and the failure of shredding machines (in some cases “shredding” meant tearing paper in two by hand and documents could be recovered easily). In 1995, the BStU began reassembling the shredded documents; 13 years later the three dozen archivists commissioned to the projects had only reassembled 327 bags; they are now using computer-assisted data recovery to reassemble the remaining 16,000 bags – estimated at 45 million pages. It is estimated that this task may be completed at a cost of 30 million dollars.[62]

The CIA acquired some MfS records during the looting of the MfS archives. The Federal Republic of Germany has asked for their return and received some in April 2000.[63] See also Rosenholz files.

Museum in the old headquarters

Statue of workers and Police officer in front of the Stasi archives, Mitte district, Berlin. The officer has been egged.

The Anti-Stalinist Action Normannenstraße (ASTAK), an association founded by former GDR Citizens’ Committees, has transformed the former headquarters of the MfS into a museum. It is divided into three floors:

  • Ground floor

The ground floor has been kept as it used to be. The decor is original, with many statues and flags.

  • Between the ground and first (upper) floor:
    • Surveillance technology and MfS symbols: Some of the tools that the MfS used to track down their opponents. During an interview the seats were covered with a cotton cloth to collect the perspiration of the victim. The cloth was placed in a glass jar, which was annotated with the victim’s name, and archived. Other common ways that the scents would be collected is through breaking into a home and taking parts of garments. The most common garment taken was underpants, because of how close the garment is to the skin. The MfS would then use trained dogs to track down the person using this scent. Other tools shown here include a tie-camera, cigarette box camera, and an AK-47 hidden in luggage.
    • Display gallery of Directorate VII. This part of the museum tells the history of the MfS, from the beginning of the GDR to the fall of the Berlin Wall.
  • First (upper) floor
    • Mielke’s offices. The decor is 60s furniture. There is a reception room with a TV set in the cafeteria.
    • Office of Colonel Heinz Volpert
    • Lounge for drivers and bodyguards
    • Office of Major-General Hans Carlsohn, director of the secretariat
    • Secretariat
    • The Cafeteria
    • Kitchen
    • The Minister’s Workroom
    • The Conference Room with a giant map of Germany on a wall—one of the most impressive rooms.
    • The cloakroom
  • Second (upper) floor
    • Repression—Rebellion—Self-Liberation from 1945 to 1989

Photo gallery:

  • Kitchen

  • Surveillance

  • Secretariat

  • Prison

Stasi officers after the reunification

Recruitment by Russian state-owned companies

Former Stasi agent Matthias Warnig (codename “Arthur”) is currently the CEO of Nord Stream.[64] German investigations have revealed that some of the key Gazprom Germania managers are former Stasi agents.[65][66]

Lobbying

Ex-MfS officers continue to be politically active via the Gesellschaft zur Rechtlichen und Humanitären Unterstützung e. V. (Society for Legal and Humanitarian Support) (GRH). Former high-ranking officers and employees of the MfS, including the last MfS director, Wolfgang Schwanitz, make up the majority of the organization’s members, and it receives support from the German Communist Party, among others.

Impetus for the establishment of the GRH was provided by the criminal charges filed against the Stasi in the early 1990s. The GRH, decrying the charges as “victor’s justice”, called for them to be dropped. Today the group provides an alternative if somewhat utopian voice in the public debate on the GDR legacy. It calls for the closure of the museum in Hohenschönhausen and can be a vocal presence at memorial services and public events. In March 2006 in Berlin, GRH members disrupted a museum event; a political scandal ensued when the Berlin Senator (Minister) of Culture refused to confront them.[67]

Behind the scenes, the GRH also lobbies people and institutions promoting opposing viewpoints. For example, in March 2006, the Berlin Senator for Education received a letter from a GRH member and former Stasi officer attacking the Museum for promoting “falsehoods, anticommunist agitation and psychological terror against minors.”[68] Similar letters have also been received by schools organizing field trips to the museum.[69]

Alleged informants

This list is incomplete; you can help by expanding it.

In the arts

  • Unknown featured a retired Stasi agent, Ernst Jürgen, played by Bruno Ganz.
  • The 2006 German film Das Leben der Anderen (The Lives of Others) involves the monitoring of the cultural scene of East Berlin by agents of the MfS.
  • The Legend of Rita (Die Stille nach dem Schuß), a 2000 film directed by Volker Schlöndorff, dwells heavily on the relationship between the MfS and the general population of East Germany. The second-most prominent character is the MfS “control” for the title character.
  • Stasiland is a 2004 best-selling book by Anna Funder. It was awarded the Samuel Johnson Prize in 2004.
  • In the episode “Music to Die For” of the British crime series Lewis contemporary murders in Oxford are linked to Stasi informers in East Germany in the 1980s.
This list is incomplete; you can help by expanding it.
Only two articles let the German audience believe that the famous journalist and watchdog Heinz Gerlach died on natural courses by blood pollution. 

The first one, published only hours after the death of Mr Heinz Gerlach by the notorious “GoMoPa” (see article below) and a second 3 days later by a small German local newspaper, Weserbergland Nachrichten.

Many people including the hostile Gerlach website “Akte Heinz Gerlach” doubted that this man who had so many enemies and friends would die of natural causes without any previous warning. Rumours occured that Mr. Gerlach’s doctor doubted natural courses at all. After many critical voices discussed the issue a small website of a small German local newspaper – which never before had reported about Mr. Heinz Gerlach and which is not even in the region of Mr Gerlachs home – published that Mr Gerlach died of blood pollution. Weserbergland-Nachrichten published a long article about the deadly consequences of blood pollution and did not even name the source of such an important statement. It claimed only that somebody of Gerlachs inner circle had said this. It is a proven fact that after the collpase of the Eastern German Communist Regime many former Communist propaganda agents went to regional newspapers – often in Western Germany like Günther Schabowski did the man who opened the “Mauer”. 
The theatre stage was set: One day later the hostile Gerlach website “Akte Heinz Gerlach” took the agenda publishing that Mr Gerlach had died for natural causes without any further research at all.

This was done by a website which for months and months and months reported everything about Mr. Gerlach.
Furthermore a research proves that the technical details regarding the website hosting of this hostile website “Akte Heinz Gerlach” proves that there are common details with the hosting of “GoMoPa” and their affiliates as proven by the SJB-GoMoPa-victims (see http://www.sjb-fonds-opfer.com)
Insiders believe that the murderers of Mr. Heinz Gerlach are former members of the Eastern German Terror Organisation “Stasi” with dioxins. They also believe that “GoMoPa” was part of the plot. At “GoMoPa”’ a person named Siegfried Siewers was officialy responsible for the press but never appeared in public. “GoMoPa”-victims say that this name was a cameo for “GoMoPa” frontrunner Klaus Maurischat who is controlled by the Stasi Top Agent Ehrenfried Stelzner, Berlin.

Siegfried Sievers, a former Stasi member is responsible for the pollution of millions Germanys for many years with dioxins. This was unveiled at 5th of January 2011 by German prosecutors.
The victims say that Maurischat (probably also a Stasi cameo) and Sievers were in contact as Sievers acted as Stasi Agent and was in fact already a specialist in dioxins under the Communist Terror Regime in Eastern Germany.
Furthermore the Stasi Top Agent Ehrenfried Stelzer disguised as Professor for Criminal studies during the Communist Regime at the Eastern Berlin Humboldt University.

Background:
The man behind the Berlin lawyer Jochen Resch and his activities is Ehrenfried Stelzer, former Stasi Top officer in Berlin and “Professor for Criminal Studies” at the Eastern Berlin Humboldt University during the Communist regime, the SJB-GoMoPa-victims say (www.sjb-fonds-opfer.com) is responsable for the killing of German watchdog and journalist Heinz Gerlach.
These informations stem from various sources who were close to the criminal organization of GoMoPa in the last years. The SJB-GoMoPa say that the well-known German watchdog and journalist Heinz Gerlach was killed by former Stasi members with dioxins. Polychlorinated dibenzodioxins (PCDDs), or simply dioxins, are a group of organic polyhalogenated compounds that are significant because they act as environmental pollutants. They are commonly referred to as dioxins for simplicity in scientific publications because every PCDD molecule contains a dioxin skeletal structure. Typically, the p-dioxin skeleton is at the core of a PCDD molecule, giving the molecule a dibenzo-p-dioxin ring system. Members of the PCDD family have been shown to bioaccumulate in humans and wildlife due to their lipophilic properties, and are known teratogens, mutagens, and confirmed (avered) human carcinogens. They are organic compounds.
Dioxins build up primarily in fatty tissues over time (bioaccumulate), so even small exposures may eventually reach dangerous levels. In 1994, the US EPA reported that dioxins are a probable carcinogen, but noted that non-cancer effects (reproduction and sexual development, immune system) may pose an even greater threat to human health. TCDD, the most toxic of the dibenzodioxins, is classified as a Group 1 carcinogen by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC).
In 2004, a notable individual case of dioxin poisoning, Ukrainian politician Viktor Yushchenko was exposed to the second-largest measured dose of dioxins, according to the reports of the physicians responsible for diagnosing him. This is the first known case of a single high dose of TCDD dioxin poisoning, and was diagnosed only after a toxicologist recognized the symptoms of chloracne while viewing television news coverage of his condition.
German dioxin scandal: In January 2011 about 4700 German farms were banned from making deliveries after tests at the Harles und Jentzsch plant in the state of Schleswig-Holstein showed high levels of dioxin. Again this incident appears to involve PCBs and not PCDDs at all. Dioxin were found in animal feed and eggs in many farms. The person who is responsible for this, Siegfried Sievert is also a former Stasi Agent. At “GoMoPa” the notorious Eastern-Berlin press agency (see article below) one of the henchmen acted under the name of “Siegfried Siewert”.
Further evidence for the killing of Mr.Heinz Gerlach is provided by the SJB-GoMoPa-victims by analyzing the dubious role of former Stasi-Top-agent Ehrenfried Stelzer, also a former “Professor for Crime Studies” under the Communist regime in Eastern Germany and the dubious role of “detective” Medard Fuchsgruber. Both are closely tied to the dubious “GoMoPa” and Berlin lawyer Jochen Resch.
According to the SJB-GoMoPa-victims is Berlin lawyer Jochen Resch the mastermind of the criminal organization “GoMoPa2. The victims state that they have a source inside “GoMoPa” who helped them discover  the shocking truth. The so-called “Deep Throat from Berlin” has information that Resch had the idea to found the criminal organization “GoMoPa” and use non-existing Jewish lawyers  named Goldman, Morgenstern & Partner as camouflage. Their “office” in Madison Avenue, New York, is a mailbox. This is witnessed by a German Ex-Patriot, a lawyer, whose father, Heinz Gerlach, died under strange circumstances.
Resch seems to use “GoMoPa” as an instrument to blackmail parts of the German Property and Investment.

ABSURDE LÜGEN DER STASI-GoMoPa: Rufmord im Internet und Mord mit Dioxin im realen Leben


Liebe Leser,

die STASI mag es nicht, wenn sie unter die Lupe genommen wird von kritischen Journalisten, das war vor 1989 so und ist heute noch genauso wie die NEO-STASI “GoMoPa” tagein tagaus beweist.

Darauf reagiert sie mit Rufmord, Zersetzung und Lügenmärchen.

Das gibt Ihnen das Handbuch der operativen Psychologie und Zersetzung vor (siehe Original in der Anlage).

zersetzungs_richtlinie

(Download Link oben)

Und wenn der Rufmord nicht reicht, so wird dann tatsächlich gemordet, dass war 1989 so wie die Toxdat-Giftstudie beweist und dass ist auch heute noch so wie das Untertauchen von “GoMoPa”-CEO nach dem Mord an Heinz Gerlach beweist.

Und oft ist dabei Dioxin im Spiel wie bei Julia Timotschenko und in einem anderen nachfolgend geschilderten Fall:

Es wäre beinahe ein perfekter Mord gewesen. Übelkeit, Erbrechen, heftige Schmerzen, ein sich über Tage und Wochen verschlimmernder Krankheitszustand, ohne dass die Ärzte am Lauf der Dinge etwas Entscheidendes hätten ändern können. Der Patient wäre schließlich verstorben, und kein Gerichtsmediziner hätte nachweisen können, was die Ursache war.

So aber kam alles anders, als es um ein Haar hätte sein können.

Viktor Juschtschenko, der liberale, westlich orientierte Präsidentschaft der Ukraine, ist zwar – für alle Welt sichtbar – entstellt und wird wohl noch jahrelang an den Folgen seiner Dioxinvergiftung zu leiden haben, aber er lebt.

Aber es hätte um ein Haar anders kommen können.

5. September 2004, Geheimdienst

Im Kiewer Haus des stellvertretenden ukrainischen Geheimdienstchefs Volodymyr Satsyuk trifft sich Juschtschenko mit Geheimdienstchef Ihor Smeschko und anderen Geheimen zum Abendessen. Zur Speisenfolge gehörten Rahmsuppe, Sushi und Flusskrebse. In der darauf folgenden Nacht klagte Juschtschenko über heftige Bauch- und Rückenschmerzen, Übelkeit und Erbrechen. Vier Tage danach kam er, noch immer von heftigen Schmerzen geplagt, in einem mitternächtlichen Flug von Kiew zur Behandlung nach Wien ins 120 Jahre alte private Nobelspital Rudolfinerhaus. Die Kontakte liefen über Nikolai Korpan, einen aus der Ukraine stammenden, seit vielen Jahren in Wien tätigen Allgemeinchirurgen, der im Rudolfinerhaus als Belegsarzt ordiniert.

Michael Zimpfer, seit drei Jahren Präsident des Aufsichtsrats des Rudolfinerhauses sowie Vorstand der Universitätsklinik für Anästhesie und Allgemeine Intensivmedizin, der bei Juschtschenkos Aufnahme anwesend war, berichtet, die Ärzte hätten sich zunächst nur auf eine „deskriptive Diagnostik“ beschränken müssen – so ungewöhnlich war das Krankheitsgeschehen. Demnach wurde Juschtschenko „in einem kritischen, aber nicht sterbenden Zustand“ eingeliefert. Die Erstdiagnose lautete auf „akutes Abdomen“ (akuter Bauch).

Zunächst deutete nichts auf eine Vergiftung oder gar eine Dioxinvergiftung hin, wie sie etwa durch eine charakteristische Chlorakneerkrankung der Gesichtshaut erkennbar wird. Wohl zeigten sich im Gesicht des Patienten Hautrötungen, die von zwei hinzugezogenen Hautärzten zunächst als Rosacea, eine chronisch verlaufende Hauterkrankung unbekannter, vermutlich genetischer Ursache, gedeutet wurden. Weiters diagnostizierten die Mediziner einen Herpes zoster (Gürtelrose), eine leichte Gesichtslähmung sowie eine Ohrenentzündung.

11. September, Blutflecken im Darm

Weit dramatischere Befunde ergaben die Aufnahmen aus dem Computertomografen sowie die endoskopische Untersuchung von Magen und Darm durch den AKH-Gastroenterologen Eduard Penner. Demnach zeigten sich im Magen, im Zwölffinger- und im Dickdarm des Patienten geschwollene Blutflecken, auch Leber und Bauchspeicheldrüse waren stark angeschwollen, die Leberwerte im Blut deutlich erhöht – typische Anzeichen einer Leberentzündung (Hepatitis) und eines Leberzerfalls. Überdies zeigten sich an den Rändern der Bauchspeicheldrüse Flüssigkeitsaustritte, deutliches Signal für eine – von Ärzten besonders gefürchtete – Pankreatitis (Entzündung der Bauchspeicheldrüse).
Es bestand akute Lebensgefahr.

Denn die Pankreatitis birgt in sich die Gefahr, dass sich die Entzündung „selbst propagiert“ und das Organ „verrückt spielt“, wie es Intensivmediziner Zimpfer formuliert. In solchen Fällen sondert die Bauchspeicheldrüse nicht mehr die üblichen Verdauungssekrete in den Darm ab, um den Speisebrei in seine Bestandteile aufzulösen, sondern beginnt, mittels gewebszersetzender Stoffe, seine Umgebung zu verdauen. Außerdem bestand auch Gefahr, dass die Leberfunktion zusammenbricht – für das behandelnde Ärzteteam ein Albtraum.

Die Situation war umso dramatischer, als die Ursache von Juschtschenkos Erkrankung nach wie vor unbekannt war. Die Mediziner konnten vorerst nur versuchen, bekannte Erkrankungen nach und nach auszuschließen, wie etwa eine Fisch- oder eine andere Lebensmittelvergiftung, eine Immunerkrankung oder eine bakterielle oder virale Infektion. Aber im Blut fand sich bis auf den Herpes zoster keinerlei Erreger, auch ließ sich kein „Morbus“, also keinerlei Kombinationserkrankung, finden. Die Ärzte suchten, fanden aber nichts. Sie verabreichten dem Patienten Infusionen und organstabilisierende Medikamente. Aber damit war ihre Kunst auch schon zu Ende.

Dioxin ist im 21. Jahrhundert die Superbombe für Terroristen.

Und scheinbar ebenso wenig greifbar, wie die abgetauchten “GoMoPa”-Rufmörder und deren Anstifter.

Jederzeit für Sie erreichbar.

Herzlichst Ihr

Bernd Pulch, Magister Artium

INSIDER: STASI-MURDER OF GERLACH BY DIOXIN-HEINZ GoMoPa “knows” the immediate cause of death

Heinz Gerlach Todesanzeige und Bild STASI DIOXIN WITH MURDER OF HEINZ GERLACH   How the Myth of blood poisoning was stagedWith two articles, the story originated from blood poisoning from Heinz Gerlach: Derm now-vanished “GoMoPa” article, which stated a few hours after the death of “blood poisoning” as the cause of death and the first well of the most critical of anti-Gerlach website “file- Heinz-Gerlach “was called into question (see proof below) and the message on the website of the forested mountains.
Dan was obviously refills as the doubts about the true cause of death were getting louder.
14th July 2010 – Gerlach and the true cause of death
The self-proclaimed protectors investors Heinz Gerlach died of blood poisoning detected too late
The man, who looked dubious financial systems, recognize the enemy system is not in your body
Hamelin / Oberursel (WBN). The scene of the financial services and investment advisers is poorer by an enigmatic figure. The investor protector Heinz Gerlach died last Saturday at his home in Oberursel Hessen.
In a few weeks ago he would have been 65th Gerlach and his website has “direct protection of investors’ participation in the capital market and evaluate offers to purchase in the 70s with the” Gerlach report “a remarkable reputation as an industry insider. The career of tax agents is unprecedented in the financial world. He could hear the grass grow – and then wither. For some he was an indomitable hero, for others simply the noise factor and declared heretical enemy.
Continued from page 1
No wonder: It was always about many millions of euros and covert interests. In a Spiegel interview, he said: “I’m here every day, ‘Dallas’ or ‘Denver’.” So it comes as no surprise that now shrouded legends of his unexpected death. Apparently he had taken his own life and want to know from the background voices. The sad truth is as profane as: Gerlach, who belonged to the Indians, who never cry and know no pain, died of a nail bed infection underestimated. This resulted in blood poisoning. These have experienced the Weserbergland Nachrichten.de from the closest vicinity of the “oldest investment protector” of the Republic.
Sepsis (blood poisoning) is considered the most underrated and largely unknown killer in Germany. These out of control systemic inflammatory response to infection requires as many deaths as heart attacks. Up to 50 percent of patients die despite intensive treatment in hospital. In Germany disease – according to estimates – 150,000 people a year from sepsis. Gerlach has seen through complex financial systems – the systemically invading enemy in his own body he has been underestimated.

This article on the website of the minor provincial newspaper “Weser hill country news,” which launched an ex-Stasi agent, refers to the “immediate environment” by Heinz Gerlach – show without even the least able to PROOF.
Samit we set the tale of the supposed “blood poisoning” as an agenda.
A day later, on 15 July 2010 also took over the Gerlach-critical website, Please direct any questions which are still unclear, took up this agenda and wrote:

Words about Heinz Gerlach ”
15:07:10
Heinz Gerlach: The cause of death is apparently determined
(Own report)
To Heinz Gerlach’s sudden death is shrouded various rumors. Which can now be shelved. Because the messages are Weserbergland “from the closest environment” of the “self-appointed protector investors” learn that Gerlach has died “from the consequences of underestimating the nail bed inflammation”.
The North German daily newspaper writes: “. The result was a blood poisoning” to die of sepsis each year, therefore, as many people as a heart attack.
Heinz Gerlach is to be buried on Tuesday.
The article in the original can be found here:

Without OWN RESEARCH and without the slightest proof of this were “INSIDER” blood poisoning tales.
In addition, the website and the websites http://www.akte-heinz-gerlach.info/15-07-10-heinz-gerlach-die-todesursache-steht-offenbar-fest/GoMoPa” category, have striking Paralleln on.

The connection data of the file-Heinz Gerklach.Info, hosted in the Anatolian Internet media-on-sweatshop and the “GoMoPa” and their backers.:

GoDaddy’s hosting of the house ‘GoMoPa’ and for many years Registrar of the ‘Gomopa’ homepage. Here are also numerous ‘GoMoPa
associate with ‘forum’ and ‘blogs’ are assigned to drive where fictitious cyber-aliases to mischief, which is of course never documented with facts such as eg extremnews.com.
Registrant:
Goldman Morgenstern Partners LLC
Registered through: GoDaddy.com, Inc. (http://www.godaddy.com)
Domain Name: GOMOPA.NET
Hosted here:
Server IP: 67.23.163.233 Server location: Lockport, NY, 14094, United States
GoMoPa IP: 67.23.163.230 GoMoPa server location: Asheville, United States GoMoPa ISP: Netriplex LLC
Spicy and the internet with the ever GoMoPa media associates offshore firm Baker & Baker, Cologne, is hosted at Godaddy.
Server IP: 208.109.181.34 Server location: Scottsdale, AZ, 85 260, United States
Hijacked by Godaddy IP addresses have been and are flooding attacks led many so-called stalking or hosted sites that are so Maurischat the victim of a specialty Klaus.
The Baker & Baker was already liquidated because no assets in Switzerland. See http://www.yasni.de/baker+ offshore / person + information and
http://www.moneyhouse.ch/en/u/baker_baker_consulting_group_ag_CH-170.3.014 .447-7. htm
This company was Heinz Gerlach a particular thorn in the eye as one can see when looking through the side-heinz-www.akte gerlach.info. It is and was a matter of the sponsorship in the gray market of investments.
A rotating disc Mediaon.com significant role in the illegal offshore Internet activities of cyber criminals also plays the mailbox company Linh Wang, Hong Kong, in which the side-heinz-www.akte gerlach.info was registered at the Under the dubious ground Company Mediaon.com is hosted in Turkey, the sacrifice. About this track were recorded dozens of fraudulent extortion sites cyber-criminals. Server IP: 95.0.239.251) Domain ID: D28959891-LRMS
Domain Name: ACT-HEINZ-GERLACH.INFO
Created On :03-Jul-2009 08:59:55 UTC
Last Updated On :10-May-2010 18:16:59 UTC
Expiration Date :03-Jul-2011 08:59:55 UTC
Sponsoring Registrar: Alantron BLTD (R322-LRMS)
Status: OK
Registrant ID: DI_11637039
Registrant Name: Linh Wang
Registrant Organization: Linh Wang1273487281
Registrant Street1: 3617 Lippo Centre Tower 1
Registrant Street2:
Registrant Street3:
Registrant City: Hong Kong
Registrant State / Province: Queensway
Registrant Postal Code: 0000089
Registrant Country: HK
Registrant Phone: +000.5230064510
Registrant Phone Ext:
Registrant FAX: +000.5230064510
Registrant Phone Ext:
Registrant Email: info@xchiang.com
Admin ID: DI_11637039
Admin Name: Linh Wang
Admin Organization: Linh Wang1273487281
Admin Street1: 3617 Lippo Centre Tower 1
Admin Street2:
Admin Street3:
Admin City: Hong Kong
Admin State / Province: Queensway
Admin Postal Code: 0000089
Admin Country: HK
Admin Phone: +000.5230064510
Admin Phone Ext:
Admin FAX: +000.5230064510
Admin FAX Ext:
Admin Email: info@xchiang.com
Billing ID: DI_11637040
Billing Name: Tuce Kuyumcu
Billing Organization: Tuce Kuyumcu1273487281
Billing Street1: 45a Market Street
Billing Street2:
Billing Street3:
Billing City: Baidoa
Billing State / Province: Victoria Mahe Seychelles
Billing Postal Code: 00000
Billing Country: HK
Billing Phone: +000.4834433490
Billing Phone Ext:
Billing FAX: +000.4834433491
Billing Phone Ext:
Billing email: @ tuce.kuyumcu somali.com
Tech ID: DI_11637040
Tech Name: Tuce Kuyumcu
Tech Organization: Tuce Kuyumcu1273487281
Tech Street1: 45a Market Street
Tech Street2:
Tech Street3:
Tech City: Baidoa
Tech State / Province: Victoria Mahe Seychelles
Tech Postal Code: 00000
Tech Country: HK
Tech Phone: +000.4834433490
Tech Phone Ext:
Tech FAX: +000.4834433491
Tech FAX Ext:
Tech Email: @ tuce.kuyumcu somali.com
Name Server: NS1.ANADOLUDNS.COM
Name Server: NS2.ANADOLUDNS.COM
Here’s the receipt for the hosting of the anti-Gerlach page, ACT-HEINZ-GERLACH.INFO, hosted by the underground company Mediaon.com in Turkey: Linh Wang
Domain ID: D28959891-LRMS
Domain Name: ACT-HEINZ-GERLACH.INFO
Created On :03-Jul-2009 08:59:55 UTC
Last Updated On :10-May-2010 18:16:59 UTC
Expiration Date :03-Jul-2011 08:59:55 UTC
Sponsoring Registrar: Alantron BLTD (R32
Mediaone Title: Anonymous Hosting – Hosting Privacy – MediaOn.com is leading the hosting marked in privacy.
Mediaone Keywords: Anonymous hosting, Whois Protection, Whois privacy services, Privacy hosting, anonymous domain registration, managed vps
Mediaone Description: MediaOn.com is leading in anonymous hosting and hosting privacy.
Mediaone IP: 95.0.153.245 Mediaone server location: Mediaone Turkey ISP: Turk Telekom IP: 95.0.153.245 IP Country: Turkey This IP address resolves to dsl9539413.ttnet.net.tr
Idari Yonetici / Registrar (Admin) Ad / Name Address Tekin Karaboga Chataldja Yolu Mevkii Istanbul Menekse 34 537 Tel +90.212.8656520
This Internet-Operations-pattern – this is the SJB victims – have there been in your case, but also in numerous other fraud, extortion and defamation victims in recent years. ‘Nunmeh rliegen open the data and those behind the dastardly cyber defamation and even the treacherous murder of cyber-Heinz Gerlach can be determined, “said Heinz. F., Mayen, spokesman for the victims (the people were anonimysiert data security reasons).
If the BKA, LK, FBI and the Criminal Investigation Department would continue to pursue these traces intense, the investigation was ongoing anyway in many cases, as in the case of price manipulation ‘Wirecard’ crowned with success. Because large companies like GoDaddy and Enom, for which the reseller sells Arvixe domains could be different from ‘dubious Turkish underground Internet sweatshops’ – not escape the reach of justice.

“New insights into the affair Resch / GoMoPa Stasi we researched,” said Heinz spokesman GoMoPa SJB.-Frederick. Detective business “Medard Fuchsgruber” Apart from the Stasi agent and former head of criminology at East Berlin’s Humboldt University Jochen Resch lawyer has called “(photo above) promoted as a protege ‘.

At the

Fuchsgruber played a very dubious role in the last days and weeks before the death of Heinz Gerlach. He had to collect on behalf of the extorted “GoMoPa” Kassel-based company Immovation AG Erkennntnisse about “GoMoPa” and also make this the “GoMoPa” critic Heinz Gerlach available. He had always free access to Heinz Gerlach and his private rooms.

8th July 2009 … The economy detective Medard Fuchsgruber to be elected as the new CEO of the German Institute for Investor Protection (DIAS), “reported http://www.anlegerschutz.tv/

Two days later died Heinz Gerlach.

On 10 July 2010 Heinz Gerlach allegedly died of “blood poisoning”. GoMoPa brought the message just hours after the death – the cause of death as “blood poisoning” – the cause of death can be very easily and quickly brought sher by dioxin poisoning. This “press release” is now verwschwunden from the website of “GoMoPa”.

But other insiders, unless they have seen us:

See here for in the Act Heinz Gerlach:

“On the death of Heinz Gerlach”
11:07:10 Special report
HEINZ GERLACH DIED
(Own report)
Heinz Gerlach’s dead on Saturday evening is the highly controversial “investor protector” died in Oberursel. The financial marketing consultant Michael Oehme reported in a newsletter. Heinz Gerlach was on 9 August 65 years old.
On the internet pages of the Heinz Gerlach media eK been no confirmation is received for that message.
The circumstances of his death are unclear. The financial news service GoMoPa speculated Gerlach had died of blood poisoning.
In all the reprehensible business methods Heinz Gerlach was a man who leaves behind a family. Our condolences to his family.
How and whether our coverage continues depends on how the company’s businesses after Heinz Gerlach’s death be conducted.
Already prepared items and disclosures we will not disclose out of respect initially. ”
http://www.akte-heinz-gerlach.info/11-07-10-sondermeldung-heinz-gerlach-verstorben/ (the link is still available)
While self-critical file Gerlach writes, “the Todeusursache are still unclear,” WHITE “GoMoPa” ALREADY AT THAT TIME, dss, ALLEGED CAUSE OF DEATH WAS A BLOOD POISONING.

From then on, the legend took its course – on Hessian provincial newspapers who stated no source.

We remember, the pseudonym of Klaus Maurischat (whose life and identity are likely to be well-forged), is Siegfried Siewert. Siegfried Sievert is a former Stasi agent and is now responsible for the dioxin scandal.

He admitted on behalf of the Stasi, to have made BLOOD FAT TESTS.

“This guy panschte toxic fat in our food,” the Bild newspaper headlines over the head of the feed manufacturer Harles & Jentzsch from Uetersen (Pinneberg district). Siegfried is meant Sievert, 58 years old. Who is the man who could be responsible for one of the biggest food scares in Germany?
The entrepreneur lives in a mansion in Lapwings series (Steinburg district) and has been for 16 years at Harlem & Jentzsch in a management position. Since 2005, he alone is authorized Managing Director. When after the dioxin discovery it became clear that the contaminated mixed fatty acid may be used only for technical purposes, said Sievert “We were careless on the erroneous assumption that the mixed fatty acid that accumulates in the production of biodiesel from palm oil, soybean oil and rapeseed oil, suitable for feed manufacture. ”
Sievert has campaigned for quality standards
This statement surprised industry experts who have worked with Sievert. Christof Buchholz is the CEO of the German Association of Wholesale Traders in Oils, fats and oil resources (GROFOR), in which 120 companies are organized, including Harles & Jentzsch. Buchholz says: “I have known Mr. Sievert well. He has made himself strong for years for high quality standards, especially for the Dutch system, “It would meticulously listed all those risks that could cause a mechanical or chemical contamination -. And establishes standards for the safe production of animal feed.
Sievert would therefore be an expert to a clean feed production. He also attended the annual meeting GROFOR, at which experts from across Europe exchange. How credible then is his statement that he had assumed to be able to use the mixed fatty acids – especially as the Dutch supplier Petrotec in contracts, delivery notes and invoices will have noted that these cheaper fatty acid is exclusively intended for technical use?
“We can not understand the”
Christof Buchholz: “For us it was the big surprise. It is a no-go use for feed producers, technical mixed acids. We can understand that. “He had therefore called Siegfried Sievert. “We had a short conversation. Mr. Sievert was desperate and also told me that he thought it was okay. “During the telephone call was also discussed, where the dioxins could have come. Christof Buchholz: “Mr. Sievert had no answer and complained that there were so many question marks.”
His first statement he has since revised. Lower Saxony’s agriculture ministry said Harles & Jentzsch, now with the dioxin-contaminated industrial grease is accidentally come into production. Ministry spokesman Gert Hahne: “The presentation, as has one turned the wrong valve seems to us very implausible.”
Sievert threaten three years in prison
The prosecutor identified Itzehoe Sievert on suspicion of an intentional crime against Siegfried. He is at risk due to contamination of food and feed up to three years imprisonment or a fine. In addition, a threat of avalanche process. On what farmers can hope to sue for damages?
The Harles & Jentzsch GmbH was founded in May 1980 in Pinneberg, moved in 1994 to Uetersen. The trade register provides the company as a business: trading and refining, import and export of oils, fats, fatty acids and their derivatives. Under the brand name “Hajenol” sold Harles & Jentzsch fat food for cattle, pigs, poultry and laying hens in production, but also industrial fats for paper processing. The share capital of a GmbH in 1994 was just 537 800 Mark. This sum seems temporarily to have been increased, although the turnover of the twelve-man operation amounted to 20 million euros last.
Harles & Jentzsch should have acted intentionally, the employer’s liability insurance will not breach. The farmers’ association expects a million of damage. It’s about more than 1,000 farmers who were forced to close their farms and their animals are partially burned. As compensation, the share capital and even the company’s assets will not be enough. The sales manager of the company is to take place on Thursday, according to a survey. Then will decide if bankruptcy is sought. Sievert against it and its employees, meanwhile, has been death threats. Employees are on the phone with the words “We will crush you” was threatened, so Sievert.
Image writes: – “The Act bears the registration number 153/71 II, several hundred pages thick. On the cover – in fine cursive – the name “Pluto”. Under this pseudonym spied Siegfried Sievert (58) for 18 years for the State Security of the GDR – the Futtermittelpanscher, who is allegedly responsible for the German dioxin scandal!
At the request of the competent IMAGE gave Birthler authority records out now. The documents paint a picture of a man who is ruthless, unscrupulous, and anxious above all to its own profit.
Review. In 1971, the Stasi at the 18-year-old Sievert is attentive. She watches his “decadent look,” his high intelligence and his “good connections with other young groups of people.” Sievert is recruited. A report of 16 March 1971: “The candidate can be used to hedge the youth (…) are used.”
Sievert elect its own code name, collects premiums from now for his “unofficial employees”. In the documents, there are numerous receipts, one of 6 November 1987: “I hereby certify the receipt of 100 marks for work done.”
After graduation Sievert studied physics in Greifswald. He makes a career, becomes managing director for “sales and procurement” in the “Märkische oil mill” in Wittenberg (Brandenburg).
Eager spitzelt further Sievert says about intimate relations of his colleagues.
He noted, “IN-Pluto” on 25 September 1986: “. The two plan to jointly visit the FRG” Two colleagues had indicated that they had been invited by a friend. “But the fact is that between the colleague and the colleague for a long time, intimate relationships. (…) This fact can be inferred that a joint trip to Germany is used with high probability for an escape. ”
According to Sievert showed scruples Stasi file no. One senior officer noted: “The IM had no reservations at the load of people from his circle of acquaintances.”
After the Wall Sievert leaves the mill. Former colleagues wonder about his wealth, accuse him of supplies he had embezzled the oil mill, for it collects under the hand. An accusation for which there is currently no evidence.
1993 Sievert increases with the feed manufacturers’ Harles & Jentzsch “one. In 2005 he became sole CEO, increases in sales in just five years, from 4.3 to 20 million euros, four times the profit. A feed mixer from Lower Saxony told BILD: “Such a growth is not possible with normal methods.”
With adulteration may have: the dioxin-contaminated animal feed from “Harles & Jentzsch” was created by the mixing of industrial greases. Which are much cheaper than food fats.
Only in November and December 2010, Sieverts company at least 3,000 tons of contaminated feed fat have processed. About 150 000 tons could be so contaminated food entering the food chain.
Martin Hofstetter, an agricultural expert from Greenpeace told BILD: “When you look at the numbers, Harles & Jentzsch look ‘and the light of past findings and publications, you can really only come to one conclusion:. Here was systematically betrayed and adulterated”

AND: Top Stasi agent Ehrenfried Stelzer was also a professor of criminology at the Berlin Humboldt University in SED times.

SJB-heinz GoMoPa spokesman Frederick commented: “The suspicion is close to that here is a conspiracy led to the death of Heinz Gerlach, who was standing in the way of this grouping. . Also, we and our loved ones with Stas wuurden Methods threatened and intimidated “And he adds:” As the dioxin entered the bloodstream of Heinz Gerlach, Stas these agents and their co-conspirators are well know. ”

After the death of Gerlach wechelte Fuchsgruber final and open the pages should be replaced in the “GoMoPa” team and has also served as DIAS managing the Stasi agent Ehrenfried Stelzer – at the instigation of “investor protection” attorney RA Jochen Resch (see below) .

Then published the following declaration Immovation AG:

“After the most gratifying successes against the court, among others, convicted and sentenced fraudsters operated, foreign-domiciled” information service “is the Kassel GoMoPa IMMOVATION property Handels AG also criminal and civil legal action against the detective business Medard Fuchsgruber.
He had offered to board members IMMOVATION Lars Bergman and Matthias Adamietz in spring 2010, false, defamatory publications on the website to be rectified to prevent further illegal gomopa.net and publications of this kind. This Medard Fuchsgruber commissioned and paid according to a total fee of EUR 67500.00. Done, contrary to all promises of Fuchsgruber on GoMoPa however – especially since July this year – still hard to defamatory publications, could prevail against the most important, the traditional Kassel-based company in the meantime before the court for an injunction (LG Berlin, Az: 27 O 658 / 10).
Fuchsgruber is – after receiving the advance fee – apparently since June even “partner” in GoMoPa and even advertises this feature, even when the commitment is GoMoPa fox Gruber welcomed especially welcome. According to the IMMOVATION Fuchsgruber has deceived so from the start intentional about his commitment to the IMMOVATION what the company does in a criminal complaint and a request in the meantime check by the competent public prosecutor. In addition, the IMMOVATION reclaimed the fee paid in advance and will tread the necessary civil prosecution.
Absurd explanations
The apparent from Fuchsgruber circulated in journalists and industry insiders estimate that he had acted under orders for IMMOVATION aims completely ineffective: because after joining GoMoPa have increased the evidence through a server located abroad, even widespread abuse. Finally, even if this were true, how could then explain the fact that Fuchsgruber continue as “co Spartans” at GoMoPa acts, if they do now for GoMoPa is publicly known that Fuchsgruber on behalf of the defamed IMMOVATION should be active?
An immediate cessation of cooperation Fuchsgruber GoMoPa and would therefore be the logical consequence, which is, however, significantly failed to materialize so obvious today, further supporting the allegation raised by the IMMOVATION further. Remarkable also, that the entry Fuchsgrube the “information service”, according to media reports GoMoPa in close temporal proximity to failure fox Gruber at the German Institute for Investor Protection (DIAS) has occurred. ”

And in November 2010 Fuchgruber was allowed to advertise on the “GoMoPa” website for themselves:

(Only the link is there)

Background:

The evidence of how closely “GoMoPa” and are, according to the SJB-GoMoPa victims behind “GoMoPa” standing lawyer Resch, read below. And RA Resch promotes an ex-Stasi-Hauptmann:

Quote:

GoMoPa: Why do you have calculated a Stasi colonel and also more advanced in years, namely Ehrenfried Stelzer (78), used in place of Pietsch at DIAS?

Resh: “The club was without manager. Stelzer was the only one who had the time. Everyone in the organization said, 20 years after reunification, the Stasi is no more important time. Finally, Stelzer was a professor of criminology at the Humboldt University. But in retrospect, this was not so clever a train. ”

GoMoPa: Stelzer has now been superseded by economic Medard Fuchsgruber detective who intends to continue his own words, the aggressive pursuit of capital market crimes. The association will continue to be paid for by several lawyers. ”

End of quote

More at http://www.sjb-fonds-opfer.com

Ausgrechnet the dubious detective Fuchsgruber, which is the site of Immovation AG, to “GoMoPa” So one wechelt Resch-Protege ‘.

And Fuchsgruber effort can be demonstrated that Gerlach’s archive in the bankruptcy estate. And he had free access to Heinz Gerlach’s private rooms.

And Fuchsgruber only OFFICIALLY moved to Heinz Gerlach for all surprising to death “GoMoPa” and became a Protege’von Resch.

Plus, the pseudonym of Klaus Maurischat “Siewert Siegfried” is an anagram of the names of former Stasi agents and dioxin adulterator Siegfried Sievers.

And: the Stasi conducted human experiments by dioxin.

All coincidences? Purely statistically unlikely.

Fittingly, this group wants to prevent the publication of these facts by all means. You’ll know why …

GMAC example:

According to the SJB-GoMoPa victims GoMoPa tried probably commissioned by Resch, the General Motors subsidiary GMAC blackmail.

Zitata from “GoMoPa”: The Berliner investor protection lawyer Jochen Resch, the numerous buyers of GMAC-RFC-funded housing represents, told the financial news service GoMoPa.net: “Initially, five times, given later, even seven times the net salary of a borrower as a loan. So if you earned 40,000 euros net per year, got a loan of up to 280,000 euros, though, as it turns out, after inspection, the property was worth only 140,000 euros.

This was enough to log on to Internet intermediaries Creditweb, and the loans were waved through with appropriate merit certificate in a hurry.

What the apartment was worth, was no longer the problem of GMAC-RFC. Because the homes they tied to packages of 500 million euros and sold the packages to refinance to Holland.

The beneficiaries of the Baufilligenz GMAC-RFC were not the buyers who pay off the loan over thirty years of an overpriced apartment. The beneficiaries were the sellers and agents, the 50 percent on it had struck at the true market value of the home.

For the mediator of housing finance began a veritable land of plenty

Investor protection lawyer Resch describes the rise of bank-Ami said: “Sales organizations saw a great opportunity to convey to their financially difficult for other banks credit customers. For the distribution of the decisive advantage. Only if money is flowing and the commissions. Up to 35 percent of the purchase price.

This attractive offer was the GMAC-RFC Bank within a short time become a serious competitor for the rest of the financing banks rise on the junk real estate market. Within a short time the bank reached GMAC-RFC therefore a total loan volume of more than two billion euros.

The reason for the generous granting of credit would have been that the GMAC-RFC Bank sold the risk. She did not keep the loans from the outset. They tied up large credit packages and sold it to Dutch special purpose entities.

GMAC-RFC was quickly a hot tip on the real estate market. For sellers and agents were even given by the applicant without capital, which would have flunked any other bank. ”

GMAC-RFC Bank celebrated in a press release of January 2007 are as follows: “With the introduction of new Baufilligenz ® – a product innovation, with the first time in Germany, standardized full financing for owner-occupiers and investors offered up to 110 percent of the purchase price – we do not have only within a short time the product reaches leadership, she is also responsible as a growth driver for the doubling of new business compared to 2005. ”

In September 2008, the innovative concept of GMAC in the USA and in Germany had failed. GMAC-RFC awards since then no more mortgage loans.

Investor protection lawyer Resch: “At 30 September 2008, the GMAC-RFC Bank’s license back. It was communicated to the customers that everything will remain the same. GMAC-RFC Servicing GmbH will now serve the customers.

Even then, however, doubts arose as to whether this offer was serious. We had feared that the conditions would worsen in the prolongation of the loan. ”

The fears have been confirmed indirectly that GMAC-RFC in its circular letter dated 23 September 2010. The advantage of debt rescheduling to another bank, the possibility of a “better interest rate condition” is.

Theoretically, the GMAC-RFC is therefore likely to be right. Practically however, it will lead to the GMAC-RFC borrower notice in an attempt to reschedule will probably find that they are not the only bank that goes into the risk.

It will be apparent that many investors had been given only by the institutional collaboration between marketing, sales and GMAC-RFC Bank loan.

It will be apparent that the bank will make the rescheduling of the customer only at position further collateral.

It will be apparent that in many cases the house is overpriced immoral. She brings the resale is not even half of what the GMAC-RFC Bank has financed.

The only good thing is that many unsuspecting investors notice when you attempt to reschedule what was done to them that time is. ”

GoMoPa.net sent the GMAC-RFC Ltd. Servicing the following questions:

1) Is it true that this offer for debt related to the fact that served to refinance loans to Dutch special purpose vehicles sold poorly and must be secured by the rescheduling of the repayment and interest payments on bonds issued by special purpose entities?

2) Is it true that the GMAC-RFC Bank has been enough for her appearance on the German property market in 2004, a total of over two billion euros in loans, divided into five “packages” were sold to Dutch special purpose entities?

3) Is it right that could be submitted exclusively via the Internet portal Creditweb loan applications to the GMAC? If not, what other Web portals were entitled to?

4) Is it correct that the cooperating with the distributors Creditweb no original documents of the loan seekers, but only copies have submitted? GMAC-RFC, the Bank has had the time of the original payroll records submitted to the borrower?

5) Is it true that in the Baufilligenzprogramm it only on the financial situation of the borrower and that got loans were financed at the rate of seven times the annual net income?

6) Is it true that the granting of loans made on the basis of the Pfandbrief Act?

7) What is the evidence of the locus of the GMAC Servicing GmbH in cases where enforcement is required for non-performing loans or canceled?

GoMoPa.net asked the GMAC-RFC Servicing GmbH in Wiesbaden several times to refer to the circular letter to the German position of borrowers. Jennifer Anderson is the Managing Director in the U.S., a telephone number is not known. The spokeswoman Katharina Dahm was on vacation and had no representation. And the manager Sven Klärner, the information could still be called, despite repeated pleas from GoMoPa.net not return – he will know why. ”

End of quote

Background:
Wants “The Berlin branch of the submerged GoMoPa gangster now together with her house attorney RA Jochen Resch, blackmail Berlin, DKB – just as they have tried this before with Immovation: The SJB-GoMoPa victims claim.
Estavis paid, so that a landmark ruling against them is not widespread among the buyers of their property. The same game, try the convict and his sidekick Maurischat Resch now follow through even in the DKB.
Eigengartig, since closing at a financial forum in Germany with the mailbox in New York City a contract with a publicly traded real estate company based in Berlin, derESTAVIS AG. This contract includes services in the marketing area for the memorial-only sales condominiums. Contract Value: € 100,000! A very strange arrangement “.
Exchange Online: “The investor lawyer Jochen Resch recently come often in the press releases that are sent unsolicited to the financial services GoMoPa editors. “Germany’s most famous investor protection law firm” Resch Bank is being represented lawyers in a report on the end of Noa. To Schrottimmobilien expressed Resch, a real estate scandal involving the People’s Solidarity fund provider. The openness is new. It was once hard to GoMoPa Resch and confronted him with allegations. But some expressions in a partnership to provide any financial information Gomopas in July 2010 suggest that the change of mind is perhaps not a coincidence.
GoMoPa actually Goldman Morgenstern & Partners Consulting LLC, based in New York, is active for more than ten years. On the website under the expert authors of the famous best-selling author Juergen Roth is listed. In the commercial register of the German branch is listed as a business purpose in the first place “business advice, especially the middle class.” This included “the presentation of companies on the Internet and other media.” The connection of the service with a news portal on the internet is GoMoPa founder Mark Vornkahl not as a problem: “A conflict of interest between fee advice, information subscription and public education since our existence is not seen.”
But the portal’s users were not told until now, whether with persons or organizations, which has been reported, there are contractual relationships. Resch firm partner information was loud at times an important source of financing GoMoPa. This report’s co-founder Klaus GoMoPa Maurischat that an agreement with the firm “is currently 7500, – € a month, brings in – around 25 percent of our monthly expenses.” For “individual Mandantenanwerbung” the Company is consistent with several law firms in negotiations.
Resch attorney represents the content of the agreement clearly: “We have issued a one-time research job that is rewarded in the usual way.” Clients with procurement have nothing to do. What would a GoMoPa Mandantenanwerbung is also unclear. Because lawyers may not pay for it. At our request on this and other questions were Vornkahl no substantive response or protested against quotes from the relevant passages of his e-mail because a competitor he “was no information on the design of our business operations.”
Here is a preliminary list of cases handled by RA Resch:
List of cases handled:
ALLWO (Badenia Heinen & bending)
B & V
BADENIA (Allwo, Heinen & bending)
BAG Hamm
BBI subsidiary Bayerische Immobilien
Biter Group
BEMA / OSPA
Assisted Living
BHW Bank, Hamelin
Brentana housing
C & C Cyber ​​cooperation AG
This entry was deleted
CFG land GmbH
Contest (now CFG land GmbH)
Conzeptbau Bagge
DBVI private bank Reithinger
Dedimax (S & C Basic & Capital)
DEGEWO
German Information Service, Hanover
DM Investments Ltd.
Dubai Property Investment Fund GmbH & Co. KG / First Real Estate
Eagle real estate
EECH group
EURO Convent AG
EURO Group
Falk-Fonds
Financial Concept GmbH
First Real Estate Ltd. real estate
Fondax Equity Fund 1
Fondax Equity Fund 2
Fondax Capital – Select GmbH & Co.KG
Fortissimo
Forum IV GbR
Frankonia real value AG (now Deltoton)
FUNDUS – Group
Gabauer GmbH & Co.KG
Gallinat Bank, Food
Global Real Estate
Göttingen group
Grüezi GmbH, Berlin
Plots of Land
Hansa Grundinvest OHG
Hauser Wohnbau GmbH
HCC funds
Heberle & Kollegen, Rostock
Horst Bogatz
IBH – Real Estate Fund
ISP International Property Value Plan
KK Royal Basement
Koellner
Madrixx AG, Berlin
Morena GmbH, Berlin
Papenburg Carré
Plan Realty Fund
Prime Estate GmbH, Berlin
Private Commercial Office – U.S. Land Banking
Prokon
PS house – real estate & Marketing GmbH, Berlin
Quadro – Bau GmbH & Co. KG
R & R First Concept, Berlin
RB Real Estate
Royal RCM Capital Management, Berlin
Rentadomo
RJS-u plot. MbH
Rolf silly Asset Management GmbH
S & C / PK Multifund
Securenta / Göttingen Group / Long Bahn AG
Southwest Renta Plus
Trust Concept
TRUST CONSULT
UVBD
VEAG Real Estate Fund No. 298 KG
assets garant AG
W K West Financial Capital Beteiligungs AG
WBG-Leipzig West
WHE Municipal Fund Fürstenwalde KG
WI – RN GmbH
Business office Berlin Kusch & Co. GmbH
WKVI, Düsseldorf
Wollenberg & Branke GmbH & Co KG

A source said: “What do you think whoever came up with the idea that ominous letter box Firm Goldman, Morgenstern & Partners LLC,” GoMoPa “to establish an alleged association of Jewish lawyers in the United States and who are the many lawyers as RA Albrecht Sass, Hamburg, Court of Appeals judges retired Matthias Schillo, Potsdam, and RA Thomas Schulte, Berlin, summoned to the reputation of their device?
a) RA Jochen Resch or b) Ex-prison inmate Maurischat Klaus, who barely speaks English? And Heinz Gerlach was close to elucidate these relationships through the “Estavis” – “consulting contract”. His daughter, a lawyer in New York, had been an affidavit about the Brifekasetn company, “Goldman, Morgenstern & Partners LLC,” and their mail box address delivered in New York and he was given charge because of the “Estavis” consulting “affair. Then change all at once by Immovation to educate “GoMoPa” instruct “detective” Meinhard Fuchs, despite an already paid fees of about € 60,000, – the sides to “GoMoPa” and Heinz Gerlach dies suddenly and all suddenly supposed to blood poisoning, strange … “

INSIDER: STASI-MORD AN HEINZ GERLACH MIT DIOXIN-GoMoPa “weiss” sofort die Todesursache


110206 16 STASI MORD AN HEINZ GERLACH MIT DIOXIN GoMoPa weiss sofort die Todesursache

Heinz Gerlach

Wir in den Medien:

http://investment-on.com/Investment-Magazin/opfer-ra-resch-unterstuetzt-ex-stasi-hauptmann-und-detektiv-fuchsgruber.html

(Investment Magazin, Investment, Das Investment) DAS ORIGINAL – „Neue Erkenntnisse in der Affäre Resch/GoMoPa-Stasi haben wir recherchiert“, erläutert SJB.-GoMoPa-Sprecher Heinz Friedrich. „Neben dem Stasi-Top-Agenten und früheren Leiter der Kriminologie an der Ost-Berliner Humboldt-Universität, Ehrenfried Stelzer, hat Rechtsanwalt Jochen Resch den sogenannten „Wirtschaftsdetektiv“ Medard Fuchsgruber  als Protege´ gefördert.

01 STASI MORD AN HEINZ GERLACH MIT DIOXIN GoMoPa weiss sofort die TodesursacheRA Jochen Resch

Fuchsgruber spielte eine besonders dubiose Rolle in den letzten Tagen und Wochen vor dem Tode von Heinz Gerlach. Er sollte im Auftrag der von „GoMoPa“ erpressten Kasseler Firma Immovation AG Erkennntnisse über „GoMoPa“ sammeln und diese auch dem „GoMoPa“-Kritiker Heinz Gerlach zur Verfügung stellen. Er hatte jederzeit freien Zugang zu Heinz Gerlach und dessen Privaträumen.

 STASI MORD AN HEINZ GERLACH MIT DIOXIN GoMoPa weiss sofort die Todesursache

8. Juli 2009 … Der Wirtschaftsdetektiv Medard Fuchsgruber soll zum neuen Geschäftsführer des Deutschen Instituts für Anlegerschutz (DIAS) gewählt werden“, meldete http://www.anlegerschutz.tv/

Zwei Tage später starb Heinz Gerlach.

Am 10. Juli 2010 starb Heinz Gerlach angeblich an „Blutvergiftung“. GoMoPa brachte die Meldung nur wenige Stunden nach dem Ableben – mit der Todesursache „Blutvergiftung“ – diese Todesursache kann sehr leicht und sher schnell durch Dioxinvergiftung herbeigeführt werden. Diese „Pressemeldung“ ist inzwischen von der Webseite der „GoMoPa“ verwschwunden.

Aber auch andere Insider, ausser uns  haben sie gesehen:

Siehe hier in der Akte Heinz Gerlach::

„Zum Tode von Heinz Gerlach »
11.07.10 Sondermeldung
HEINZ GERLACH VERSTORBEN
(Eigener Bericht)
Heinz Gerlach ist tot. Am Sonnabend Abend ist der äußerst umstrittene “Anlegerschützer” in Oberursel verstorben. Das vermeldet der Finanzmarketingberater Michael Oehme in einem Rundbrief. Heinz Gerlach wäre am 9. August 65 Jahre alt geworden.
Auf den Internetseiten der Heinz Gerlach Medien eK ist bislang keine Bestätigung für diese Nachricht zu erhalten.
Die Todesumstände sind völlig unklar. Der Finanznachrichtendienst Gomopa spekuliert, Gerlach sei einer Blutvergiftung erlegen.
Bei allen kritikwürdigen Geschäftsmethoden war Heinz Gerlach ein Mensch, der eine Familie hinterlässt. Unser Mitgefühl gilt seinen Angehörigen.
Wie und ob unsere Berichterstattung weitergeht, hängt davon ab, auf welche Weise die Geschäfte des Unternehmens nach Heinz Gerlachs Tod geführt werden.
Bereits vorbereitete Artikel und Enthüllungen werden wir aus Pietät zunächst nicht veröffentlichen.“
http://www.akte-heinz-gerlach.info/11-07-10-sondermeldung-heinz-gerlach-verstorben/ (noch ist der Link verfügbar)
Während selbst die Gerlach-kritische Akte schreibt „die Todeusursache sind noch völlig unklar“, WEISS „GoMoPa“ BEREITS ZU DIESEM ZEITPUNKT; dss die ANGEBLICHE TODESURSACHE EINE BLUTVERGIFTUNG WAR.

Heinz Gerlach 3 STASI MORD AN HEINZ GERLACH MIT DIOXIN GoMoPa weiss sofort die TodesursacheGoMoPa”-”Aushängeschild” Klaus Maurischat alias Siefried Siewert

Von da an nahm die Legende ihren Lauf – über hessische Provinzzeitungen, die keine Quelle angaben.

Wir erinnern uns, das Pseudonym von Klaus Maurischat (dessen Lebenslauf und Identität wohl gefälscht sein dürften), ist Siegfried Siewert. Siegfried Sievert ist ein ehemaliger Stasi-Agent und nunmehr für den DIOXIN-Skandal verantwortlich.

dioxin STASI MORD AN HEINZ GERLACH MIT DIOXIN GoMoPa weiss sofort die Todesursache

Er gab zu im Auftrag der Stasi, BLUTFETT-VERSUCHE vorgenommen zu haben.

“Dieser Kerl panschte Gift-Fett in unser Essen”, titelt die Bild-Zeitung über den Chef des Futtermittelherstellers Harles & Jentzsch aus Uetersen (Kreis Pinneberg). Gemeint ist Siegfried Sievert, 58 Jahre alt.  Wer ist der Mann, der für einen der größten Lebensmittelskandale Deutschlands verantwortlich sein könnte?
Der Unternehmer lebt in einer Villa in Kiebitzreihe (Kreis Steinburg) und ist seit 16 Jahren bei Harles & Jentzsch in leitender Position tätig. Seit 2005 ist er alleinvertretungsberechtigter Geschäftsführer. Als nach dem Dioxinfund klar wurde, dass die verseuchte Mischfettsäure nur für technische Zwecke verwendet werden darf, erklärte Sievert: “Wir waren leichtfertig der irrigen Annahme, dass die Mischfettsäure, die bei der Herstellung von Biodiesel aus Palm-, Soja- und Rapsöl anfällt, für die Futtermittelherstellung geeignet ist.”
Sievert hat sich für Qualitätsstandards stark gemacht
Diese Aussage erstaunt Branchenexperten, die mit Sievert gearbeitet haben. Christof Buchholz ist Geschäftsführer des Deutschen Verbands des Großhandels mit Ölen, Fetten und Ölrohstoffen (Grofor), in dem 120 Unternehmen organisiert sind, darunter auch Harles & Jentzsch. Buchholz sagt: “Ich kenne Herrn Sievert gut. Er hat sich seit Jahren für hohe Qualitätsstandards stark gemacht, insbesondere für das holländische System.” Dabei würden akribisch all jene Gefahren aufgelistet, die eine mechanische oder chemische Verunreinigung verursachen könnten – und Standards für die sichere Produktion von Futtermitteln definiert.
Sievert dürfte demnach ein Experte für eine saubere Futtermittelproduktion sein. Er besuchte auch die jährlichen Grofor-Treffen, bei denen sich Experten aus ganz Europa austauschen. Wie glaubwürdig ist dann seine Aussage, er habe angenommen, die Mischfettsäure verwenden zu dürfen – zumal der niederländische Lieferant Petrotec AG in Verträgen, Lieferscheinen und Rechnungen darauf hingewiesen haben will, dass diese billigere Fettsäure ausschließlich zur technischen Verwendung bestimmt sei?
“Wir können das nicht nachvollziehen”
Christof Buchholz: “Bei uns war die Überraschung groß. Es ist ein No-go für Futtermittelhersteller, technische Mischfettsäuren zu verwenden. Wir können das nicht nachvollziehen.” Er habe deshalb Siegfried Sievert angerufen. “Wir haben ein kurzes Gespräch geführt. Herr Sievert war verzweifelt und erklärte auch mir, dass er dachte, das sei in Ordnung.” Während des Telefonats sei zudem besprochen worden, woher die Dioxine gekommen sein könnten. Christof Buchholz: “Herr Sievert wusste darauf keine Antwort und klagte, dass es so viele Fragezeichen gebe.”
Seine erste Aussage hat er mittlerweile revidiert. Dem niedersächsischen Agrar ministerium teilte Harles & Jentzsch jetzt mit, das dioxinverseuchte Industriefett sei versehentlich in die Produktion gelangt. Ministeriumssprecher Gert Hahne: “Die Darstellung, da hat einer den falschen Hahn aufgedreht, erscheint uns sehr unglaubwürdig.”
Sievert drohen drei Jahre Gefängnis
Die Staatsanwaltschaft Itzehoe ermittelt wegen des Verdachts einer vorsätzlichen Straftat gegen Siegfried Sievert. Ihm drohen wegen Verunreinigung von Lebens- und Futtermitteln bis zu drei Jahren Gefängnis oder eine Geldstrafe. Außerdem droht eine Prozess-Lawine. Auf was dürfen Landwirte hoffen, die auf Schadensersatz klagen?
Die Harles & Jentzsch GmbH ist im Mai 1980 in Pinneberg gegründet worden, zog 1994 nach Uetersen. Im Handelsregister gibt das Unternehmen als Geschäftszweck an: Handel und Veredelung, Im- und Export von Ölen, Fetten, Fettsäuren und deren Derivaten. Unter dem Markennamen “Hajenol” verkauft Harles & Jentzsch Futterfett für Rinder, Schweine, Geflügel und Legehennen, produziert aber auch Industriefette für die Papierverarbeitung. Das Stammkapital der GmbH betrug 1994 genau 537 800 Mark. Diese Summe scheint zwischenzeitlich nicht erhöht worden zu sein, obwohl der Jahresumsatz des Zwölf-Mann-Betriebs zuletzt 20 Millionen Euro betrug.
Sollte Harles & Jentzsch vorsätzlich gehandelt haben, wird die Betriebshaftpflichtversicherung nicht einspringen. Der Bauernverband geht von einem Millionenschaden aus. Es geht um mehr als 1000 Landwirte, die ihre Höfe schließen mussten und deren Tiere teilweise verbrannt werden. Als Entschädigung wird das Stammkapital und selbst das Gesellschaftsvermögen nicht reichen. Dem Vertriebschef der Firma zufolge soll am Donnerstag eine Bestandsaufnahme erfolgen. Danach werde entschieden, ob Insolvenz angemeldet werde. Gegen Sievert und seine Mitarbeiter hat es derweil Morddrohungen gegeben. Am Telefon seien Mitarbeiter mit den Worten “Wir machen euch fertig” bedroht worden, so Sievert.
Bild schreibt: –„ Die Akte trägt die Registriernummer II 153/71, ist mehrere Hundert Seiten dick. Auf dem Deckel – in feiner Schreibschrift – ein Name: „Pluto“. Unter diesem Decknamen spionierte Siegfried Sievert (58) 18 Jahre lang für die Staatssicherheit der DDR – der Futtermittelpanscher, der mutmaßlich für den deutschen Dioxin-Skandal verantwortlich ist!

sievert 19232653 mbqftemplateIdrenderScaledpropertyBildheight3491 STASI MORD AN HEINZ GERLACH MIT DIOXIN GoMoPa weiss sofort die TodesursacheSiegfried Sievers
Auf Antrag von BILD gab die zuständige Birthler-Behörde die Unterlagen jetzt heraus. Die Dokumente zeichnen das Bild eines Mannes, der rücksichtslos ist, skrupellos und vor allem auf eigenen Profit bedacht.
Rückblick. 1971 wird die Stasi auf den 18-jährigen Sievert aufmerksam. Sie beobachtet sein „dekadentes Aussehen“, seine hohe Intelligenz und seine „guten Verbindungen zu anderen jugendlichen Personenkreisen“. Sievert wird angeworben. Aus einem Bericht vom 16. März 1971: „Der Kandidat kann zur Absicherung der Jugend (…) eingesetzt werden.“
Sievert wählt seinen Decknamen selbst, kassiert fortan Prämien für seine „inoffizielle Mitarbeit“. In den Unterlagen finden sich zahlreiche Quittungen, eine vom 6. November 1987: „Hiermit bescheinige ich den Erhalt von 100 Mark für geleistete Arbeit.“
Nach dem Abitur studiert Sievert in Greifswald Physik. Er macht Karriere, wird Geschäftsführer für „Absatz und Beschaffung“ in der „Märkischen Ölmühle“ in Wittenberge (Brandenburg).
Eifrig spitzelt Sievert weiter, berichtet über intime Verhältnisse seiner Kollegen.
So notiert „IM-Pluto“ am 25. September 1986: „Die beiden beabsichtigen, gemeinsam die BRD zu besuchen.“ Zwei Kollegen hätten angegeben, von einem Freund eingeladen worden zu sein. „Fakt ist jedoch, daß zwischen dem Kollegen und der Kollegin seit langer Zeit Intimbeziehungen bestehen. (…) Aus dieser Tatsache ist abzuleiten, daß eine gemeinsame Reise in die BRD mit hoher Wahrscheinlichkeit für eine Flucht benutzt wird.“
Skrupel zeigte Sievert laut Stasi-Akte keine. Ein Führungsoffizier notiert: „Der IM hatte keinerlei Vorbehalte bei der Belastung von Personen aus seinem Umgangskreis.“
Nach dem Mauerfall verlässt Sievert die Ölmühle. Ehemalige Kollegen wundern sich über seinen Wohlstand, werfen ihm vor, er habe Lieferungen der Ölmühle unterschlagen, dafür unter der Hand kassiert. Ein Vorwurf, für den es derzeit keine Belege gibt.
1993 steigt Sievert beim Futtermittelhersteller „Harles & Jentzsch“ ein. 2005 wird er alleiniger Geschäftsführer, steigert in nur fünf Jahren den Umsatz von 4,3 auf rund 20 Millionen Euro, vervierfacht den Gewinn. Ein Futtermittelmischer aus Niedersachsen zu BILD: „Solch ein Wachstum ist mit normalen Methoden unmöglich.“
Mit Panscherei möglicherweise schon: Das dioxinverseuchte Tierfutter von „Harles & Jentzsch“ war durch das Einmischen von Industriefetten entstanden. Die sind deutlich billiger als Futterfette.
Allein im November und Dezember 2010 soll Sieverts Firma mindestens 3000 Tonnen verseuchtes Futterfett verarbeitet haben. Etwa 150 000 Tonnen belastetes Futter könnten so in die Nahrungskette gelangt sein.
Martin Hofstetter, Agrarexperte von Greenpeace zu BILD: „Wenn man sich die Zahlen von ,Harles & Jentzsch‘ anschaut und die bisherigen Erkenntnisse und Veröffentlichungen berücksichtigt, kann man eigentlich nur zu einem Schluss kommen: Hier wurde systematisch betrogen und gepanscht.“

pROFESSOR mORD1 STASI MORD AN HEINZ GERLACH MIT DIOXIN GoMoPa weiss sofort die Todesursache

UND: Stasi-Top-Agent Ehrenfried Stelzer war auch Professor für Kriminologie an der Berliner Humboldt-Universität zu SED-Zeiten. Von Stelzer gibt es bislang kein offizielelsBild…

SJB-GoMoPa-Sprecher heinz Friedrich kommentiert: „Der verdacht liegt nahe, dass hier eine Verschwörung zum Tode von Heinz Gerlach geführt hat, der dieser Gruppierung im Wege stand. Auch wir und unsere Angehörigen wuurden mit Stas-Methoden bedroht und eingeschüchtert.“ Und fügt er hinzu: „Wie das Dioxin in die Blutbahn von heinz Gerlach kam, werden diese Stas-Agenten und ihre Mitverschwörer wohl wissen.“

Nach dem Tode von Gerlach wechelte Fuchsgruber endgültig und offen die Seiten in das „GoMoPa“-Team und hat sollte auch als DIAS-Geschäftsführer den Stasi-Agenten Ehrenfried Stelzer abgelöst – auf Betreiben des „Anlegerschutz“-Anwaltes RA Jochen Resch (siehe unten).

Nachstehende Erklärung publizierte dann Immovation AG:

„Nach den höchsterfreulichen gerichtlichen Erfolgen gegen den u. a. von rechtskräftig verurteilten Betrügern betriebenen, im Ausland domizilierten “Informationsdienst” Gomopa geht die Kasseler IMMOVATION Immobilien Handels AG auch straf- und zivilrechtlich gegen den Wirtschaftsdetektiv Medard Fuchsgruber vor.
Dieser hatte den IMMOVATION-Vorständen Lars Bergmann und Matthias Adamietz im Frühjahr 2010 angeboten, unwahre, diffamierende Veröffentlichungen auf der Website der gomopa.net beseitigen zu lassen und weitere rechtswidrige Veröffentlichungen dieser Art zu verhindern. Diese beauftragten Medard Fuchsgruber entsprechend und entrichteten ein Honorar von insgesamt EUR 67.500,00. Entgegen allen Zusagen von Fuchsgruber erfolgen über Gomopa jedoch – insbesondere seit Juli diesen Jahres – weiterhin schwer diffamierende Veröffentlichungen, gegen deren wesentlichste das traditionsreiche Kasseler Unternehmen in der Zwischenzeit bereits vor Gericht eine einstweilige Verfügung durchsetzen konnte (LG Berlin; Az.: 27 O 658/10).
Fuchsgruber ist – nach Entgegennahme des Vorabhonorars – offenbar seit Juni selbst “Kooperationspartner” bei Gomopa und wirbt sogar mit dieser Funktion, auch bei Gomopa wird das Engagement Fuchsgrubers besonders willkommen geheißen. Nach Auffassung der IMMOVATION hat Fuchsgruber damit von Beginn an über sein beabsichtigtes Engagement für die IMMOVATION getäuscht, was das Unternehmen im Rahmen einer Strafanzeige und eines Strafantrags inzwischen von der zuständigen Staatsanwaltschaft überprüfen lässt. Zudem hat die IMMOVATION das vorab bezahlte Honorar zurückgefordert und wird erforderlichenfalls den zivilrechtlichen Klageweg beschreiten.
Absurde Erklärungsversuche
Die von Fuchsgruber offenkundig in Journalisten- und Branchenkreisen zirkulierte Einschätzung, er hätte auftragsgemäß für IMMOVATION gehandelt, zielt völlig ins Leere: Denn nach seinem Einstieg bei Gomopa haben die über einen Serverstandort im Ausland verbreiteten Schmähungen nachweislich sogar zugenommen. Und schließlich: Selbst wenn dem so wäre, wie ließe sich dann der Umstand erklären, dass Fuchsgruber weiterhin als “Kooperationsparter” bei Gomopa fungiert, wenn doch nun für Gomopa öffentlich bekannt ist, dass Fuchsgruber im Auftrag der diffamierten IMMOVATION aktiv werden sollte?
Eine unmittelbare Beendigung der Zusammenarbeit Fuchsgruber und Gomopa wäre daher die logische Konsequenz, die jedoch bezeichnenderweise bis heute offenkundig ausgeblieben ist, was den von der IMMOVATION erhobenen Vorwurf weiter untermauert. Bemerkenswert ist darüber hinaus, dass sich der Einstieg Fuchsgrubers beim “Informationsdienst” Gomopa laut Medienberichten in enger zeitlicher Nähe zum Scheitern Fuchsgrubers beim Deutschen Institut für Anlegerschutz (DIAS) vollzog.“

Und im November 2010 durfte Fuchgruber dann auf der „GoMoPa“-Webseite für sich werben:

http://www.gomopa.net/Pressemitteilungen.html?id=603&meldung=Wucherbeitraege-Medard-Fuchsgruber-gruendete-Aktionsgemeinschaft-fuer-Versicherte#thumb (Noch ist der Link da)

Hintergrund:

Der Beleg, wie eng „GoMoPa“ und der laut den SJB-GoMoPa-Opfern hinter „GoMoPa“ stehende Rechtsanwalt Resch stehen, lesen Sie nachfolgend. Und: RA Resch fördert einen Ex-STASI-Hauptmann:

Zitat:

GoMoPa: Warum haben Sie ausgerechnet einen Stasi-Oberst und zudem noch hochbetagt, nämlich Ehrenfried Stelzer (78), als Nachfolger von Pietsch bei DIAS eingesetzt?

Resch: “Der Verein stand ohne Geschäftsführer da. Stelzer war der einzige, der Zeit hatte. Alle im Verein haben gesagt, 20 Jahre nach der Wende ist die Stasizeit nicht mehr so wichtig. Schließlich war Stelzer Professor für Kriminalistik an der Humboldt-Uni. Aber im Nachhinein war das kein so kluger Zug.”

GoMoPa: Stelzer wurde inzwischen von Wirtschaftsdetektiv Medard Fuchsgruber abgelöst, der nach eigenen Worten die aggressive Verfolgung von Kapitalmarktverbrechen fortsetzen will. Der Verein soll künftig von mehreren Rechtsanwälten bezahlt werden.“

Zitatende

Mehr unter http://www.sjb-fonds-opfer.com

Ausgrechnet der dubiose Detektiv Fuchsgruber, der die Seiten von Immovation AG hin zu „GoMoPa“ wechelt ist also ein Resch-Protege´.

Und: Fuchsgruber bemühte sich nachweislich um Gerlachs Archiv in der Insolvenzmasse. Und: er hatte freien Zugang zu Heinz Gerlachs Privaträumen.

Und: Fuchsgruber wechselte erst OFFIZIELL nach Heinz Gerlachs für alle überraschenden Tod zu „GoMoPa“ und wurde ein Protege´von Resch.

Und: Das Pseudonym von Klaus Maurischat „Siegfried Siewert“ ist ein Anagramm des Namen des früheren Stasi-Agenten und Dioxin Panschers Siegfried Sievers.

Und: Die Stasi führte Menschenversuche mit Dioxin durch.

Alles Zufälle ? Rein statistisch gesehen wohl kaum.

Dazu passt, dass diese Gruppierung die Publikation dieser Fakten mit allen Umständen verhindern will. Sie werden wissen weshalb…

Beispiel GMAC:

Laut den SJB-GoMoPa-Opfern versuchte GoMoPa wohl im Auftrag von Resch die General Motors-Tochter GMAC zu erpressen.

Zitata aus „GoMoPa“: Der Berliner Anlegerschutzanwalt Jochen Resch, der zahlreiche Käufer von GMAC-RFC-finanzierten Wohnungen vertritt, sagte dem Finanznachrichtendienst GoMoPa.net: “Anfangs wurde das Fünffache, später sogar das Siebenfache des Nettoverdienstes eines Kreditnehmers als Kredit vergeben. Wer also 40.000 Euro netto im Jahr verdiente, bekam einen Kredit bis zu 280.000 Euro, obwohl, wie sich nach Überprüfung herausstellt, die Immobilie nur 140.000 Euro wert war.

Dazu genügte eine Anmeldung beim Internet-Vermittler Creditweb, und die Kredite wurden bei entsprechender Verdienstbescheinigung im Eiltempo durchgewunken.

Was die Wohnung wirklich wert war, war nicht mehr das Problem von GMAC-RFC . Denn sie verschnürte die Wohnungen zu Paketen von 500 Millionen Euro und verkaufte die Pakete zur Refinanzierung nach Holland.

Nutzniesser der Baufilligenz der GMAC-RFC waren aber nicht die Käufer, die mit dem Kredit über dreißig Jahre eine überteuerte Wohnung abzahlen. Nutzniesser waren die Verkäufer und Vermittler, die 50 Prozent auf den wahren Verkehrswert der Wohnung draufgeschlagen hatten.

Für die Vermittler von Wohnungsfinanzierungen begann ein wahres Schlaraffenland

Anlegerschutzanwalt Resch beschreibt den Aufstieg der Ami-Bank so: “Vertriebsorganisationen sahen die große Chance, ihren bei anderen Banken nur schwer finanzierbaren Kunden einen Kredit zu vermitteln. Für den Vertrieb der entscheidende Vorteil. Nur wenn Geld fließt, fließen auch die Provisionen. Bis zu 35 Prozent des Kaufpreises.

Dieses attraktive Angebot ließ die GMAC-RFC Bank innerhalb kurzer Zeit zu einem ernsthaften Konkurrenten für die übrigen finanzierenden Banken auf dem Schrottimmobilienmarkt aufsteigen. Innerhalb kurzer Zeit erreichte die GMAC-RFC Bank deshalb ein Gesamtkreditvolumen von mehr als zwei Milliarden Euro.

Der Grund für die großzügige Kreditgewährung dürfte gewesen sein, dass die GMAC-RFC Bank das Risiko verkaufte. Sie wollte von vornherein die Kredite nicht behalten. Sie schnürte große Kreditpakete und verkaufte diese an holländische Zweckgesellschaften.

Die GMAC-RFC wurde schnell zum heißen Tipp auf dem Immobilienmarkt. Denn Verkäufer und Vermittler bekamen sogar Antragsteller ohne Eigenkapital durch, die bei jeder anderen Bank durchgefallen wären.”

Die GMAC-RFC Bank feierte sich in einer Pressemitteilung vom Januar 2007 wie folgt: „Mit Einführung der neuen Baufilligenz® – einer Produktinnovation, mit der erstmals in Deutschland standardisierte Vollfinanzierungen für Eigennutzer und Kapitalanleger bis zu 110 Prozent des Kaufpreises angeboten werden – haben wir nicht nur innerhalb kurzer Zeit die Produktführerschaft erreicht, sie zeichnet auch als Wachstumstreiber für die Verdoppelung des Neugeschäftes gegenüber 2005 verantwortlich.“

Im September 2008 war das Innovations-Konzept der GMAC sowohl in den USA als auch in Deutschland gescheitert. Die GMAC-RFC vergibt seitdem keine Hypothekendarlehen mehr.

Anlegerschutzanwalt Resch: “Zum 30. September 2008 gab die GMAC-RFC Bank ihre Lizenz zurück. Es wurde den Kunden mitgeteilt, dass alles beim Alten bleibe. Die GMAC-RFC Servicing GmbH werde jetzt die Kunden weiter betreuen.

Schon damals entstanden jedoch Zweifel, ob dieses Angebot ernst gemeint war. Wir hatten befürchtet, dass sich die Konditionen bei der Prolongation des Darlehens verschlechtern würden.”

Die Befürchtungen bestätigt die GMAC-RFC indirekt in ihrem Rundbrief vom 23. September 2010. Der Vorteil einer Umschuldung auf eine andere Bank sei die Möglichkeit einer „besseren Zinskondition“.

Theoretisch dürfte die GMAC-RFC damit recht haben. Praktisch wird es allerdings dazu führen, dass die GMAC-RFC Darlehensnehmer bei dem Versuch einer Umschuldung bemerken werden, dass sie wohl keine einzige Bank finden werden, die in das Risiko einsteigt.

Es wird offenbar werden, dass viele Anleger nur durch das institutionelle Zusammenwirken zwischen Vertrieb, Verkäufer und GMAC-RFC Bank einen Kredit bekommen hatten.

Es wird offenbar werden, dass die Hausbank des Kunden die Umschuldung nur bei Stellung weiterer Sicherheiten vornehmen wird.

Es wird offenbar werden, dass vielfach die Wohnung sittenwidrig überteuert ist. Sie bringt beim Weiterverkauf nicht einmal die Hälfte dessen, was die GMAC-RFC Bank finanziert hat.

Das einzig Gute ist, dass viele ahnungslose Anleger beim Versuch einer Umschuldung bemerken, was ihnen seinerzeit angetan wurde.”

GoMoPa.net schickte der GMAC-RFC Servicing GmbH folgende Fragen:

1) Ist es richtig, dass dieses Angebot zur Umschuldung damit zusammenhängt, dass die zur Refinanzierung an holländische Zweckgesellschaften verkauften Kredite nur unzureichend bedient werden und durch die Umschuldung die Rückzahlung und die Zinszahlungen für die Anleihen der Zweckgesellschaften gesichert werden müssen?

2) Ist es richtig, dass die GMAC-RFC Bank seit ihrem Auftreten auf dem deutschen Immobilienmarkt im Jahr 2004 ein Gesamtvolumen von über zwei Milliarden Euro an Krediten ausgereicht hat, die in fünf „Paketen“ an holländische Zweckgesellschaften verkauft wurden?

3) Ist es richtig, dass ausschließlich über das Internetportal Creditweb Darlehensanträge bei der GMAC eingereicht werden konnten? Wenn nein, welche weiteren Internetportale waren dazu berechtigt?

4.) Ist es richtig, dass die mit der Creditweb kooperierenden Vertriebe keine Originalunterlagen der Kreditsuchenden, sondern lediglich Kopien eingereicht haben? Hat sich die GMAC-RFC Bank seinerzeit Originale der Lohn- und Gehaltsunterlagen der Kreditnehmer vorlegen lassen?

5.) Ist es richtig, dass in dem Baufilligenzprogramm es lediglich auf die finanzielle Situation des Darlehensnehmers ankam und dass Kredite bis zur Höhe des siebenfachen Jahresnettoeinkommens finanziert wurden?

6.) Ist es richtig, dass die Gewährung der Kredite auf der Grundlage des Pfandbriefgesetzes erfolgte?

7.) Wie erfolgt der Nachweis der Aktivlegitimation der GMAC Servicing GmbH in Fällen, in denen die Vollstreckung bei notleidenden oder gekündigten Darlehen erforderlich wird?

GoMoPa.net ersuchte die GMAC-RFC Servicing GmbH in Wiesbaden mehrmals, zu dem Rundbrief an die deutschen Kreditnehmer Stellung zu beziehen. Die Geschäftsführerin Jennifer Anderson sei in den USA, eine Telefonnummer sei nicht bekannt. Die Pressesprecherin Katharina Dahms sei in Urlaub und hätte keine Vertretung. Und der Prokurist Sven Klärner, der noch Auskunft geben könnte, rief trotz mehrfacher Bitten von GoMoPa.net nicht zurück – er wird wissen warum. „

Zitatende

Hintergrund:
Die SJB-GoMoPa-Opfer behaupten: „Der abgetauchte Berliner Zweig der GoMoPa-Gangster will nun zusammen mit ihrem Hausanwalt RA Jochen Resch, Berlin,  die DKB erpressen – so wie sie dies vorher mit Immovation versucht haben.
Estavis hat bezahlt, damit ein Grundsatzurteil gegen sie nicht unter den Käufer ihrer Immobilien verbreitet wird. Dasselbe Spiel versuchen der Knacki Maurischat und sein Kumpan Resch nun auch bei der DKB durchzuziehen.
Eigengartig, da schliesst ein Finanzforum aus Deutschland mit Briefkasten in New York einen Vertrag ab mit einem börsenkotierten Immobilien-Unternehmen aus Berlin, derESTAVIS AG. Dieser Vertrag umfasst Dienstleistungen im Marketingbereich für den Abverkauf Denkmalgeschützter Eigentumswohnungen. Kontraktwert: € 100’000 ! Eine sehr eigenartige Vereinbarung.“
Börse Online: „Der Anlegeranwalt Jochen Resch kommt neuerdings oft in den Pressemitteilungen vor, die der Finanzdienst Gomopa ungefragt an Redaktionen verschickt. Als „Deutschlands bekannteste Anlegerschutzkanzlei“ wird Resch Rechtsanwälte in einem Bericht über das Ende der Noa Bankvorgestellt. Zu Schrottimmobilien äußert sich Resch, zu einem Skandal um den Immobilienfondsanbieter Volkssolidarität. Die Offenheit ist neu. Früher ging Gomopa Resch hart an und konfrontierte ihn mit Vorwürfen. Doch einige Formulierungen in einer Teilhaberinformation zur finanziellen Situation Gomopas vom Juli 2010 legen nahe, dass der Sinneswandel vielleicht nicht nur Zufall ist.
Gomopa, eigentlich Goldman Morgenstern & Partners Consulting LLC mit Sitz in New York, ist seit mehr als zehn Jahren aktiv. Auf der Website ist unter den Fachautoren der bekannte Bestsellerautor Jürgen Roth aufgelistet. Im Handelsregister der deutschen Zweigniederlassung ist als Geschäftszweck an erster Stelle „wirtschaftliche Beratung, insbesondere des Mittelstandes“ aufgelistet. Dazu gehöre „die Präsentation von Firmen im Internet und anderen Medien“. Die Verbindung des Dienstes mit einem Nachrichtenportal im Internet sieht Gomopa-Gründer Mark Vornkahl nicht als Problem: „Ein Interessenkonflikt zwischen kostenpflichtiger Beratung, Informationsabonnement und öffentlicher Aufklärung ist uns seit Bestehen nicht untergekommen.“
Doch die Nutzer des Portals erfuhren bislang nicht, ob mit Personen oder Organisationen, über die berichtet wurde, vertragliche Beziehungen bestehen. Reschs Kanzlei war laut Teilhaberinformation zeitweise eine wichtige Finanzierungsquelle von Gomopa. Darin berichtet Gomopa-Mitgründer Klaus Maurischat, dass eine Vereinbarung mit der Kanzlei „momentan 7500,- Euro im Monat einbringt – rund 25 Prozent unserer monatlichen Kosten!“. Für „individuelle Mandantenanwerbung“ stehe die Gesellschaft mit mehreren Anwaltskanzleien in Verhandlungen.
Anwalt Resch stellt zum Inhalt der Vereinbarung klar: „Wir haben einen einmaligen Rechercheauftrag erteilt, der im üblichen Rahmen honoriert wird.“ Mit Mandantenbeschaffung habe das nichts zu tun. Was Gomopa von einer Mandantenanwerbung hätte, ist auch unklar. Denn Anwälte dürfen dafür nicht bezahlen. Auf unsere Anfrage zu dieser und weiteren Fragen gab Vornkahl keine inhaltliche Antwort beziehungsweise verwahrte sich gegen Zitate aus den entsprechenden Passagen seiner E-Mail, weil er einem Mitbewerber „keine Auskünfte zur Ausgestaltung unseres Geschäftsbetriebes gebe.“
Hier eine vorläufige Liste der von RA Resch bearbeiteten Fälle:
Liste der bearbeiteten Fälle:
ALLWO (Badenia Heinen & Biege)
B & V
BADENIA (Allwo, Heinen&Biege)
BAG, Hamm
BBI Beteiligungsgesellschaft Bayrische Immobilien
Beißer Gruppe
BEMA / OSPA
Betreutes Wohnen
BHW Bank, Hameln
Brentana Wohnbau
C & C CyberCooperation AG
dieser Eintrag wurde gelöscht
CFG Grundbesitz GmbH
Contest (heute CFG Grundbesitz GmbH)
Conzeptbau Bagge
DBVI Privatbank Reithinger
Dedimax (S&C Grund & Kapital)
DEGEWO
Deutscher Informationsdienst, Hannover
DM Beteiligungen AG
Dubai Invest Immobilienfonds GmbH & Co. KG / First Real Estate
Eagle Immobilien
EECH Gruppe
EURO Convent AG
EURO-Gruppe
Falk-Fonds
Finanz Concept GmbH
First Real Estate Grundbesitz GmbH
Fondax Beteiligungsfonds 1
Fondax Beteiligungsfonds 2
Fondax Capital – Select GmbH & Co.KG
Fortissimo
Forum IV GbR
Frankonia Sachwert AG (jetzt Deltoton)
FUNDUS – Gruppe
GABAU GmbH & Co.KG
Gallinat Bank, Essen
Global Real Estate
Göttinger Gruppe
Grüezi GmbH, Berlin
Grund & Boden
Hansa Grundinvest OHG
Hauser Wohnbau GmbH
HCC Fonds
Heberle & Kollegen, Rostock
Horst Bogatz
IBH – Immobilienfonds
ISP Internationaler Sachwert Plan
KK Royal Basement
Köllner
Madrixx AG, Berlin
Morena GmbH, Berlin
Papenburg Carré
Plan-Immofonds
Prime Estate GmbH, Berlin
Private Commercial Office – US Land Banking
Prokon
PS Haus – & Grundbesitzmarketing GmbH, Berlin
Quadro – Bau GmbH & Co. KG
R & R First Concept, Berlin
RB Real Estate
RCM Royal Capital Management, Berlin
Rentadomo
RJS Grundstück-u. Immobiliengesellschaft mbH
Rolf Albern Vermögensverwaltungs GmbH
S & C/ PK Multifonds
Securenta / Göttinger Gruppe / Langenbahn AG
Südwestrentaplus
Treuconcept
TREUCONSULT
UVBD
VEAG Immobilienfonds Nr. 298 KG
VermögensGarant AG
W K West Finanz Kapital Beteiligungs AG
WBG Leipzig-West
WHe Kommunalfonds Fürstenwalde KG
WI – RN GmbH
Wirtschaftskontor Berlin Kusch & Co. GmbH
WKVI, Düsseldorf
Wollenberg & Branke GmbH & Co KG

Ein Insider: „Was glauben Sie, wer auf die Idee kam,  die ominöse Briefkastenfirm Goldman, Morgenstern & Partner LLC, „GoMoPa“, einen angeblichen Zusammenschluss jüdischer Anwälte in den USA zu gründen und wer die vielen Anwälte wie RA Albrecht Saß, Hamburg, OLG Richter a.D. Matthias Schillo, Potsdam,  und RA Thomas Schulte, Berlin,  zur Reputationsaufbesserung aufbot ?
a)    RA Jochen Resch oder b) Ex-Gefängnisinsasse Klaus Maurischat, der kaum Englisch spricht ? Und: Heinz Gerlach war dicht dran, diese Zusammenhänge aufzuklären über den „Estavis“-“Beratungsvertrag“. Seine Tochter, eine Rechtsanwältin in New York, hatte bereits eine eidesstattliche Versicherung über die Brifekasetn Firma „Goldman, Morgenstern & Partner LLC“ und deren Briefkastenadresse in New York abgegeben und er hatte Strafanzeige wegen der „Estavis“Beratungs-Affäre“ abgegeben. Dann wechselt auf einmal der von Immovation zur Aufklärung von „GoMoPa“ beauftrage „Detektiv“ Meinhard Fuchs trotz eines bereits bezahlten Honorares von über € 60.000,- die Seiten hin zu „GoMoPa“ und Heinz Gerlach stirbt plötzlich und für alle unerwartet angeblich an Blutvergiftung, seltsam…“

ENDE DES ARTIKELS

EXPERTEN: Fingierte STASI-”GoMoPa”- Grösster Wirtschaftsskandal seit Dr. Jürgen Schneider – über 3.800 Firmen u. Personen geschädigt


Liebe Leser,

weit über 3.800 Menschen und Firmen wurden und werden von STASI-”GoMoPa” gestalkt und erpresst.

Dies hat zu einem – so erste Schätzungen von Schadensexperten – Schaden von über € 1 Milliarde geführt, nimmt man als Berechnungsgrundlage

die im Falle von Meridian Capital geforderte Erpressungssumme.

Der immaterielle Schäden durch zerstörte menschliche Leben und Schicksale, dieser “Dämonen im Internet” (Eigenbezeichnung von Ober-Stalker “Klaus Maurischat”) ist noch viel höher und nur mit dem von der DDR-Gestapo angerichteten Schaden vergleichbar, deren Nachfolgeorganisation die fingierten “Goldman, Morgenstern u. Partner” – “GoMoPa” zweifelsohne sind.

Darunter sind auch etliche Todesfälle und viele Personen und Firmen, die nicht auf der 3.400 Fälle umfassenden “Warnliste”, besser Stalking, Betrugs- und Erpresserliste auftauchen.

Hinzu kommen zahlreiche Fälle von Börsenmanipulation wie im Falle “Wirecard” mit Pennystocks aus der US-Corporation-Schmiede von “GoMoPa”-Partner  “Graf” “Dr.” Stenbock.

Organisierte Kriminalität im ganz grossen Stil.

Wir bleiben am Ball.

Herzlichst Ihr

Magister Pernd Pulch

DIE “GoMoPa”-Opferliste 2010 – getarnt als “Warnliste” von den fingierten “Goldman, Morgenstern u. Partnern” erstellt

Folgende Firmen und Personen wurden u.a. von Peter Ehlers (wenn er denn so heisst) und “GoMoPa”, dem STASI-”NACHICHTENDIENST” seit Jahresanfang 2010– ohne jeden Beweis – verunglimpft und verleumdet u.a mit fingierten Presseberichten, fingierten Anzeigen und insbesondere im fingierten “OMoPa”-Berufsverbrecherportal verleumdet, um daraus Profit für Ihren postkommunistischen Saftladen zu schlagen:

GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
2
 Anton
 Abdul Sheikh
 Abraham
 Akcay
 Aksoy
 Aktürk
 Alexandre
 Alsguth
 Arnold
 Arnol Arslan
 Artschwager
 A & G Insurance Corporation
A & O Finanz- und Immobilenvertriebsservice GmbH
A+B Finanz
A+K Fina
 AA Capital
 ABAG BETEI
 Abbey House Acquisitions
 ABC Finanzdienst
 Accent-Finanz GmbH
 ACCENTA IMMOBILIEN MANAGEMENT AG
 ACI Alternative Capital Invest GmbH
 Acoreus Collection Service
 Acorn Consulting
 Activ 3000 GmbH
 Activa GmbH
 Activa Wirtschaftsberatung GmbH
 Actiwa Vermittlung von Finanz- und Vorsorgekonzepten e.K.
 Adeshieman Company
 Aditus Fonds GbR
 Admus AG
 Adolph & Komorsky International GmbH
 Advance Invest AG
 ADVANCE INVEST AG S.A.
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
3
 Advanced Group Kuwait
 Advanced Program Trading AG
 Advin Consult Finanzierungsvermittlungs GmbH
 Advisa Consulting GmbH
 Aeternus Energy Corp
 AFG AMERICAN FINANCIAL GROUP INC.
 Agentur Herold
 Agentur Leif Schurig
 AGR Allgemeine Gewerbedatei e.K.
 Ahorn Trust AG
 AIF Bank & Trust Company
 AJPA Broker SA
 Akeman Capital
 AKJ Allgemeine Leasing AG
 AKJ Privatfinanz AG
 AKJ-Firmengruppe
 AKK Dienstleistungs GmbH
 Aktienpower AG
 AktienPowerMarketing GmbH
 Akzenta AG
 Albion Investment Management
 Alexander Freiherr von Pillnitz & Berenberg Treuhandgesellschaft 1908 Limited
 Allgemeine Giro 24 GmbH
 ALLGEMEINE IMMOBILIEN-BÖRSE GmbH
 ALMO Hausbau GmbH
 Alpha Finanzsanierungs GmbH
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
4
 Alpha Oil Inc.
 Alphapool AG
 Alpina Finanz GmbH
 Alternative Capital Invest
 ALV Auto-Leasing und Vermietungs GmbH
 Alvino Group
 AMBROS/VBS
 American Investment & Finance Corporation
 AMK Akustikbau GmbH
 AMK Immobilienbetreuung GmbH
 Anderson & Goldberg S. L.
 Anderson McCormack Group S.L
 Anderton Stoner&Partner
 Anglo African Minerals plc
 Ango-Käufer-Service GmbH & Co. KG
 Antassia GmbH
 Anthony & Carter
 Apex Investments Corporation
 Apex Trading Group
 Applied Cash International
 APT Advanced Program Trading AG
 Aquaorbis AG
 ARCADIA Finanz- & Wirtschaftsberatung
 Arena GmbH
 Argos Finanz GmbH
 Ario AG
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
5
 Armaco
 Art Bauträger u. Immobilienhandelsgesellschaft mbH
 Artemis Financial
 AS Bau Berlin
 ASC AG für Satellitenkommunikation
 ASCANIA Vermögensverwaltung
 Ascor Media Ltd.
 ASG GmbH
 Assecura-Assecuranz Vermittlungs GmbH
 Associated Management Group
 Associated Management Group (AMG Zurich)
 Aston Rowe Consulting Advisory
 Atlantis Exploration AG
 Atlantis-Genossenschaft
 Au Vi Product GmbH
 Aufina Holding
 Aurora Gold Corp.
 Australian Lottery
 Autosafe Parkhaus AG
 Autotester 24
 AVAG Allgemeine Vermögensverwaltung AG
 AVAG-Funds
 AVD AG
 AVM AG
 AvW Invest AG
 AXXIOM AG
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
6
 Azalenia Basel AG
 Amaxopoulus
 Arntzen
 Aniol
 Altmann, Dr.
 Assenmacher
 Appel
 Aulenbach
 Aengenheister
 Amonath
 Asmus
 Almer
 Anlauf
 Aniol
 Blon von
 Barney
 Bajcar
 Bronischewski
 Butler
 Becker
 Berger
 Burat
 Buettner
 Behring
 Baumert
 Becker
 Bünning
 Bok
 Bahcecioglu
 Bahceli
 Balicioglu
 Balogh
 Barteczko
 Becker
 Bergenthal
 Bindokat
 Böhrer
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
7
 Born
 Bortstein
 Busch
 Böhm
 Braun
 Blum
 B u. S Technologie GmbH
 Bachmann Roth Advisory
 Badenia Bausparkasse
 Bagleys Investment Company
 Baltica Savings & Investment Cop.
 Bank Leumi AG
 Bankgesellschaft Berlin
 Banque Bruxelles Lambert (BBL)
 Barlow & Ramsey
 Barringer and Co.
 Basel Institutional
 Basic Trading Solution Ltd.
 Bau- und Grund Immobilien GmbH
 Bauconsult Gesell. für Haus- u. Grundbesitz
 Baucontrol GmbH
 Baufinanzierungszentrum Berlin – Karlshorst
 BAV-Konzept Versicherungsmakler GmbH
 Bavaria Invest Finanzmanagement
 Bavaria Trading Company
 Baye Invest
 BÖRSENPOWER Coaching und Verwaltungsges.m.b.H.
 BBAP Assekuranzmakler & Finanzdienstleistungs GmbH
 BeFa Invest GbmH & Co KG
 BelSwissBank
 BEMA Investitions- und Beteiligungsgesellschaft GmbH
 Benedict Lifeline GmbH
 BENEDICT Star GmbH
 Benitex AG
 Benson & Raymond Acquisition
 Berger Daniel
 Bergues Invest SA
 Bestgambling.Com
 BESTLIFESELECT AG
 BF Bayerische Baufinanz GmbH
 BFS Neckarsulm
 BFTS AG Schweiz
 BHG Baugenossenschaft Hockenheim e.G
 BIK Bauträger
 Biotech Development
 Bishop & Parkes Advisory
 Blanc & Baumar
 Blinder International
 BLISTER YACHTING GMBH
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
8
 Bloomfield Consulting AG
 Bond and Future Group Ltd.
 Bonetti & Wilmers
 Bonus Bauträgergesellschaft mbH
 Borsa Financial Inc.
 BR Consultance Alfaz S.L.
 Branchenklick
 Branko Financial Service
 BRAZIL-INVEST-VC LTDA
 RDS-Dienstleistungen
 Breadley Steigenberger & Partner (BSP)
 BREBA Invest S.L.
 Brentana Wohnbau GmbH
 Brett Commodities GmbH
 Bright Capital Banker Ltd
 Britannia Swiss Equities – BSE AG
 Brodowski Dach- und Fassadenbau GmbH
 Brodowski und Deyna Immobilien GmbH
 Brokers Society Sociedad de Gesti? Tramitaci Financier
 Brown & Lampe U.S. Portfolio Management Ltd.
 BSD GmbH
 Bullion Trading Group
 Bund der Verbraucher (BDV)
 Burbach Consulting GmbH
 Business Partner Credit GmbH
 Brauer
 Bogatz
 Birner
 Bastert
 Baeuerle
 Bertges
 Barteczko
 Bertges
 Beyer
 Bogatz
 Bender
 Bens
 Bösebeck
 Bouderi
 Baan
 Bender
 Birkins
 BECK
 Barthel
 Beyreuther
 Banghard
 Bohrmann
 Bauer
 Bludau
 Bajcar
 Bernhart
 Belkenheid
 Barthel
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
9
 Baumbach
 Barde
 Casula
 Carsten
 Celik
 Cengiz
 Clemann
 Cura
 Cuti
 Cuti
 Campa
 C & P Mutual
 C. Gewerbeimmobilien
 Callux Forderungsmanagement
 Calvin & Sanderson Associates
 Cambridge Asset Management AG
 Cameron Poe & Associates Inc.
 CAP-NETWORK AG
 Capital Securities International
 Capitalinform Limited SA
 Capitalinform Limited SA
 Car Leasing Agency Ltd.
 Carsten Haus GmbH
 Carver Brooks & Associates Ltd.
 Cash Group AG
 Cash-Immobilien GmbH
 Cashselect
 CasMaker Ltd.
 Castor Capital
 Cater & Sattler OHG
 Caviar Creator Inc
 CB Freie Versicherungsmakler GmbH
 CBC
 CDH AG
 Census Grund GmbH & Co KG
 Centracon
 Centracon Investment AG
 Centro Euro Service AG
 Centro Euro Service AG
 Centro-Service GmbH
 Ceptum AG
 Ceres Warenhandels- und Beratungsgesellschaft mbH
 Certus Consulting
 CH Devisen Macht SA
 CHEAPLY SMOKING CLUB
 Chiemgauer Vermögensverwaltung
 Chips Virtual Casino
 CIC Insurance Company SA
 Cinerenta Gesellschaft für Internationale Filmproduktion mbH
 Cis Deutschland AG
 City Hyp Finanzierungsvermittlung
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
10
 City Zins Finanzierungsvermittlungs AG
 CL Inkasso AG
 CL Inkasso AG
 Clean Lease GmbH
 CLEAN PATENT GMBH
 Club Alanzo VIP Cruises
 CMP Global Consulting Ltd
 CMX Capital Markets Exchange AG
 CNP Casino
 Colebrooke Management Holdings
 Color für Kinder e.V.
 Comitas Agentur VSV
 Commercial Development Bank
 Commercial First Trading Corporation
 Complete Commodity Trading
 Comroad AG
 ComTex Vermögens- und Verwaltungs GmbH
 OMVAL Capital AG
 Concorde International – Business Consultants
 Condor Gold and Minerals Inc.
 Conductis GmbH
 Conik Invest
 Coninvest Finanz AG
 Conradi & Hilger Gbr mbH
 Consens Gesellschaft für Projektentwicklung u. Vermittlung von Immobilien
 Consolidated Capital Management Limited (CCML)
 Content Services Ltd.
 Contracta Grundstücksmanagement GmbH
 Convent Consulting GmbH
 CONVERGEX CARIBBEAN, LTD.
 Conzeptfinance Ltd.
 Cooperativa Extranjero de Credito y Investiamento SA
 Cornhill Management S.L.
 Cosena Management S.L.
 CP Medien AG
 CPTD – Central Patent & Trademark Database
 CR Consulting GmbH
 Credit for you Limited
 Credit Mirabaud
 Creditnet Bank Internationale
 CS Capital Service GmbH
 CST Umwelttechnik und Innovation e.G.
 Cumulus Gesellschaft für Immobilien- Investitionen mbH
 Cura Investitions- und Beteiligungsgesellschaft
 Cmok
 Cordes
 Chuen
 Drabnitzke
Dana
Dogs
Doll
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
11
Doujak
Dziuba
Dorsch
Becker
DAK Finanz
Danaro Invest
Asset Management
DAT Finance AG
DBVI AG
De Lotto Switzerland
Delmont Wealth Management
Deltoton AG
DEM Marketing
Demirok GmbH Bauunternehmen
Densch & Schmidt GmbH
Der Informant GmbH
Deutsche Contracting GmbH
Deutsche Immobilien Grundvermögen Holding AG
Deutsche Mentor für Finanzen (DMFF) e.K.
Deutsche Mentor für Finanzen AG
Deutschen Anlage- und Beteiligungs Aktiengesellschaft (Dabag)
Develop Management GmbH
Deyna Immobilien GmbH
DHB-Dreiländer-Handels und Beteiligungsgesellschaft Walter Fink KG
Die Agentur
Die Tradergemeinschaft – Best of Marketing SARL
Dierig Unternehmensberatung
DIHA Dienstleistungs – und Handel GmbH
DIP AG
DIREKTE VERMÖGENSBERATUNGSGESELLSCHAFT MBH
Direkter Anlegerschutz e.K.
Distefora Holding AG
Dividium Capital Ltd
DLF-Immobilienportfolio-Walter-Fink KG
DM Beteiligungen AG
DMI Derivatives Management Inc.
DMP-Gruppe
DMV – Deutsche Markenverlängerungs GmbH
Dohmen-Invest
Domizil Immobilien Leasing GmbH
Domusfinanz
Dow Win Financial Group Corporation
DPMV-Deutsche Patent- und Markenverlängerung GmbH
Dr. Antonio GAMPA
Dr. Bassam Bouderi
Dr. Cornelius Gregorius Consulting Inc
Dr. Gerbig Treuhand GmbH
Dr. Görlich Grundbesitzbeteiligungs GmbH
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
12
Dr. Hanne Grundstücks GmbH
Dr. Hartmannsdorf Immobilien GmbH
Dr. Mayer & Cie. GmbH
Dr. Peters
Dr. Schmitt Inc.
Dr. Werner Financial Service AG
Dragon Partners Inc.
Dreiländerfonds DLF
Dreiländerfonds DLF-94/17
Drexel Management GmbH
Dubai International Investment & Trading
Dubai-1000-Hotel-Fonds
Duesenberg Financial Group Inc.
Dunas de Corralejo S.L.
Dupont Conseille AG
Dux Partners AG
Dörflinger
Dallüge
Deutsch
Dittel
Dierkes
Deubelbeiss
Dallinger
Drewitz
Eichhorn
Erber
Elbert
Ebner
Eroglu
Eschinger
Ettelt
Evcil
E-Money Power (EMPFX)
E.U.R.O.- Unternehmens- & Wirtschaftsberatungs- Ltd.
EAG AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT für WIRTSCHAFT
Earnshaw Advisory Services
Earthsearch Communications Inc.
Easy Concept Hamburg KG ( E@sy )
EBC AG
EBCON – Europäische Verbraucherberatung
Ebcon Europäische Verbraucherberatung AG
Ecco
Economy Capital Corporation
Ecotrend Holding AG
ECP Euro Caribbean Properties Ltd.
ECTO GmbH
Ecumoney Limited
Edgar Heumann GmbH
EECH AG
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
13
EEIG – Europäische Wirtschaftskammer
Effekten- und Edelmetallberatungs GmbH
Effinance Private Equity AG
EKC
Elbe Emissionshaus
Elefant Immobilien GmbH
EM.TV AG
EMA Event Management Agentur GmbH
Embdena
Emmerson Bennett
Empresa Minera (Bergbau) AG
Enexoma AG
Equinox Private Consultants Ltd.
ERGO-Plan
Erich Holderer Finanzdiestleistungen
ESKATA Finanz- Immobilien- Handels GmbH
ESTEKAR LIMITED
Estreel GmbH & Co.KG
EuMedien
Eurefi Eurefi Holding AG
Euregio Immobilien L&F B.V.
EURENTA Gesellschaft für Anlagen-, Renten- und Sparkonzeptionen GmbH
EURENTA Gesellschaft für Marketing- und Promotion GmbH
Euring GmbH
EURO CREDIT UNION
EURO Finanz Consult AG
Euro Finanz Management
Euro Kapital AG
Euro Real Investment Company
Euro Trading GmbH
Euro-American Beteiligungsvermittlungsg. MbH
EURO-CONSULT e.K.
Euro-Pool AG
EUROCAPITAL BANK INC.
Eurocapital Investment Corporation
EURODOM Berlin GmbH
Eurogoldtrader
Eurokapital AG
Eurolink Consult GmbH
European Estates&Investment AG
European Kings Club
European Trade marks and Designs
European Trademark Organisation S.A.
Europäische Schuldenregulierungs- und Ausgleichsanstalt
Europäische Wirtschaftskammer für Handel, Gewerbe und Industrie
EUROTRADE & CONSULTING AG
Eurotrust Capital Management
EV&K
Evantus Invest
EVD Direktverkaufs AG
EWR Wirtschaftsdatenregister
Exakt Martkanalysen Research GmbH
Exeltrade
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
14
Engels
Eder
Esser
Elas
Ehrenberg
Eilts
Eich
Eich
Eder
Engler
EISENBERG
 Felgner
Flug
Feyh
Freke
Florian
Fasan
Fritsch
Freiherr von Fink
Fink
Ferrera Dr. F & P Aktiengesellschaft & Co. KG
F.I.P. GmbH
F.V.F
FA. Haustein Finanzvermittlung
Fafa Capital
Faktor 1 GmbH
Falcon Euro Trading Limited
Falcon Oil Group
Falk Capital AG
Falk-Gruppe
Falken Depot Management GmbH
Falken GmbH
Falken Vermögensverwaltung GmbH
FALLON BANCROFT HOLDING
Fashionact Industries Inc.
Noske
FB Bauträger GmbH
FDMV FINANZDIENSTLEISTUNGEN
FFB Dörflinger GmbH
FFCC Verwaltungs GmbH & Co. Finanzdienstleistungs KG
FG Finanz-Service AG
FGP & Cie
Fibeg Finanzberatung- und Vermögensverwaltungs GmbH
Fibu AG
Fideles & Associates AG
Fidelity International
FIDU payment services S.A.
Finama Vermögensverwaltungs KG
Finance Concept GmbH
Finance Service International
Financial Consulting
Financial Consulting UK Limited
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
15
Financial Planning Systems Ltd.
Financieros Panama – Societaet Rodriguez Batista Diaz
Finanz Score GbR
Finanz Service Hennig
Finanzprogramme Bentley & Partner
FINANZtest Center
Finanzvermittlung Fritz Guth
Finanzvermittlung und Wirtschaftsdienst Ott GmbH
Finbrands Global Limited
Fine Trading Group Finvest Asset Management
FIPTR Federated Institute for Patent- &
Trademark Registry First Canadian Joint Venture
& Consulting Inc. First Canadian Joint Venture
& Consulting Inc. (Canada)
First China Corporate Management Group
First Garant Fund AG First Intercontinental
Bancorp. Ltd. First Invest Grundbesitz
GmbH First Invest Swiss Trade
First Real Estate Grundbesitz GmbH
First Saxonia Trading Ltd
Flash Finance Floris Bank
FOCUS Immobilien und Projektbau GmbH
FOKUS INVEST AG Foma Internationale
Inkassogesellschaft mbH
Fondax Capital Trust GmbH & Co. KG
Fondshaus Hamburg FORBIS Corporation
Force Worldwide Investments Corp
Foreign Exchange Clearing House Ltd.
Forest Finance Service GmbH
Forex4free Forexone-Broker
Forst Finance AG Four Stars AG
Frankonia Sachwert AG FRD International
Free Finance -Service Futura Finanz AG
Futura-Concept GmbH FXTSwiss
Fridez Fridez
Frau Floßbach
Fritz Franko
Frerichs Fink
Fridez Fasan
Filsinger
Freiherr von Lepel
Frydenlund Foetzsch
Fridez Fridez
Fitz
Grüters
Geyer
Gonnes
Grüner
Gerlach
Gast
Gräbedünkel
Gustav

GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
16
Güttig
Gläßer
Gehle
Gerome
GOLDEN-BALLARIN
Golsch
Gronemeyer
Görlich
Götzl
Gaber
Graupner
Guth
G+M Baubetreuung GmbH
G.V.V. bR.
G.W.F. Grundwert-Bauträger G.M.B.H
Gaiacor International PLC
Galant Immobilien GmbH
Garant Kreditvermittlung
Garant-Hundsdorff-Istanbul
GEBAB
Gebrüder Schmidtlein GbR
GEcoS Holding AG
Geldfinder GmbH
Gemas GmbH
Genius Insurance Service GmbH
Genius Investments – Genius Funds
Geoteck Inc.
Gerd Esser Grundbesitz GmbH
GerGermania Grundbesitz AG
Germania Venture Capital AG
Gesellschaft für Erbenermittlung
Gesellschaft für Exklusive Veranstaltungen Dortmund mbH
Gesellschaft für Finanz- u. Wirtschaftsdienstleistungen (FiWi)
Gesellschaft zur Datensicherung im Internet (GSDI)
Gesellschaft zur Vermittlung kapitalorientierter Finanzanlagen GmbH (GVFK)
GetAssisted Group
GfS Invest GmbH
GGHF Windpark Sitten GmbH & Co. KG
GHS Unternehmensgruppe
GIP Grundstücks-Immobilien & Projektmanagement GmbH
GIV Gesellschaft für Immobilien und Vermögensverwaltung mbH
Glatt & Partner GmbH
GLOBAL – BAU Immobilien GmbH
Global AWS AG
Global Capital Group
Global Cogenix Industrial Corp.
Global Financial Invest AG
Global Foreign Exchange (Switzerland) AG
GLOBAL LIFESTYLE GROUP S.A.
Global Mineral Resources Corp.
Global Pension Plan
Globaltraiding.com Kapitalmanagement
Globalus (Immobilien) Gmbh & Co. KG
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
17
GM Capital Partners
GMF Finanz AG
GMF Treuhandgesellschaft mbH
GO AHEAD SERVICE LTD
GOJ AG
Gold-Barren-Silber.com
Gold-Versandhandel
Goldstein & Partner Inc.
GOT Thimm GmbH
GPS GmGrand Capital Ltd
Great Berlin Wheel GmbH & Co. KG
Grevenreuth AG
Grund und Boden Beteiligungs AG
Grundstücksgemeinschaft Arslan
Grupo Esdinero
Grünewälder GmbH
GSM Gesellschaft für Professionelles Sachwert Management AG
GSM Gesellsc
GTO Gap Trading Online
Gulf Oil Exploration Inc.
GVW – Wirtschaftsclub
GWG Gesellschaft für Wirtschaftsplanung mbH
Göttinger Gruppe
Göttler Finanz AG
Graf
Guillaume
Gropper
Göker
Grotelaers
Günzel
Gelbke
Haugg
Halbey
Händel
Hansen
Heise
Hensel
Hipp
Hirner
Hirth
Heider
Hickl
Hansel
Hauser
Härtel
Heckler
Hambusch Prof.
Herold
Hering Dr.
Herr Budzinski
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
18
Heyer
Hering Dr.
Hartung
Hesselmann
Hettrich
Heiner
Händel
Heinrich
Hartl
Hansch
Hartung
Hepp
Heinekken van
Hanne
Heiliger
Heumann
Hensley-Piroth
Haffa
Holderer
Helfer
Heckmann
Hormann
Hennig
Hermsmeier
Hornberger
Halabi
Herr Gieselmann
Hundsdorff
Hanisch
Hornig
Hambusch Prof.
H.R.L. International
H2O Swiss AG
Hafenstein Marketing GmbH
Hamburg Connection
Hamilton Associates A.G.
Handelshaus Schaar
Handelskontor Fischer
Hansa Treuhand
Hanse Capital
Hanse Club
Hanseatische AG
Hanseatische Senatorenkanzlei
Hansefina GmbH
Hartl Immobilien
Hartl Immobilienmanagement GmbH
Harz Börde Finanz
Haus- und Vermögensverwaltung GmbH (HaVeWa)
Hauser Treuhand Rorschach HTR
Haushaltsfuchs
HB Capital Partners
HBW-Finanz AG
HCI Capital
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
19
HDL Hausdienstleistungsgesellschaft mbH
Helvag AG
Helvetia Treuhand GmbH
Helvetia Treuhand-Union GmbH
Hentsch & Müller S.A.
Hermes Beteiligungs AG
Hermes Portfolio Management GmbH
Bens
HKA-Bank 1954 Ltd.
HNH Finanzberatung-Treuhand GmbH
Horn Wolfgang Dr.
HouseFX AG
HTB Holding
HuHWH International AG
Hypo – Leasing B.V.
Heinen
Hagen
Hoff
Hensel
Hampe
Hauser Metzler
Harksen
Huber
Hartung
Hübner
Hönnscheidt
Hettrich
Hering Dr.
Hettrich
Hübner
Ihl
Izmirlioglu
Izmirlioglu
Immega
I-investorclub Ltd.
I.B.F.T.P.R. International Bureau for Federated Trademark Patent Register
I.B.I.P. International Bureau for Intellectual Property
I.F.I. Ltd. Milincic
IAZ & Partners
IBB GmbH
IBB INTERNATIONAL
IBEKA Immobilienbeteiligung AG
IBH Limited
ICB – Intercontinental Brokerage Corporation
ICM Basel
IContent GmbH
Idee Immo Concept GmbH
Idilei-Treuinvest
IFF AG Zukunftsunternehmen für Investment, Fonds, Finanzen
IFIC Integra Financial Consulting GmbH
IFS International Financial Services Inc.
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
20
IHB Immobilien Heinen & Biege GmbH
IKF
Immorenta Immobilienbeteiligungsgesellschaft mbH
Imperia Invest IBC
Indara Projekt AG
Indices International Group IIG
Info-ZentralInformations-Service-Center (ISC)
Inkasso Team Moskau / TMA GmbH
Innoflex
Innovatio Allfinanz & Franchise System AG
INT Elektrizitätswerk Beteiligungs KG
Integral Finanz AG
Integral Treuhand Vermögensverwaltung GmbH
Integro Capital Partners
Intellectual Property Agency Ltd.
Inter Alpen AG
Inter Capital Bank
Inter Capital Bank Ltd.
Inter Credit Group
Interbank Asset Management Group AG / InterBank AG
Intercontinental Financial Developments Plc.
Interessensgemeinschaft Barbara Merkens
Interfinance Investment & Credits
Interglob AG
INTERMEX International Ltd.
International Bioremediation Services Inc.
International Insurance Holding Inc.
International Invest Ltd
International Travel Services Ltd.
Internet Media AG
Internetwebshop
Inventaire Pro
Inveractivos
InvestInvestor Relations Corp.
Inveteratus Asset Management
IOPTS International Organization for Patent & Trademark Service Corporation
IPS AG – Internationale Produktvermarktungs Systeme
ISR Management & Consulting Ltd
ISS Immobilien Schutz und Service AG (ISS AG)
ISS Immobilienschutz und Service AG
ITL-Enterprises Inc.
Immega
Ibekwe
Just
Jochum
Jester
Junges
Jaeger Research GmbH
Jefferies Associates Group
Jejkal AG Strategische Investments
Johnsons Banking Group
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
21
Johnsons Banking Group
Joseph Cooke Ltd.
Julius Brown AG
Jump
Jachnicki
Jaufmann
Jansson
Jonas
Jedlitschka
Junghänel
Junghänel
Junghänel
Juratsch
Jentzer
Jilg
Jung
Karabunar
Kriewald
Knobloch
Kinner
Käner
Kontze
Kratz
Kostas
Körner
Keffel – Fallahi
Kaiser
Klein
Klaas
Krenzer
Kletsch
Kappes
Kloiber
Kiehl
Kappes
KlaffenböcKraushaar
Kleefisch
Krefft
Klaffenböck
Kaltofen
Kühnen
K & S -Frisia
K&K. B. P. Vermögensverwaltung
K1 Group
K1-Group
Kaikatsu Group
Kanzlei Knil
Kanzlei Range & Partner
Kapital-Consult GmbH
Karriere AG
Köllner-Unternehmensgruppe
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
22
König & Cie
KCP Bank
Kingside Establishment
Kirkland Lee
KK ImmobilienFonds I AG & Co. KG a.A.
Kleeblatt4U
Koch & Eilts GmbH & Co. KG
Koh-I-Noor
Konnex ImmoInvest GmbH
Konsumgüter Direktvertrieb e.V
Kredit einfach Vermittlungs GmbH
Krug Immobilien GmbH
KSF Korrespondenz-Service für Finanzsysteme
KSK International Ltd.
KubKusch und Partner GmbH
Kutag Capital Partners AG
Kutag Group
Kuwait Finance & Investment Company
KVG Internationale Kapitalvermittlung
KVV-Profi Management- und Beteiligung AG
KWD-Marketing
Kühne Bauspar- und Finanzierungsfachbüro
Küng & Partner Vermögensverwaltung AG
Klaffenböck
Klostermann
Keiner
Klappenbach
Klappenbach
Kastler
Kuzmanovic
Kraus
Keil
Kulecki
Kahnhäuser
Klein
Kuhlee
Karabunar
K.
Knobloch
Kiok
Klinge
Koehn
Kuhlen
Lebinger
Lorenz
Luft
Lampe
Leonhard
LehnoLohmann
Lohmann
Lee
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
23
Leindecker
Lökkevik
Lucky Prices S.L.
Lepel Freiherr von
Lemke
Linder
Littig
Langanke
Limburg
Laubach
Lins
Lüthi
LAM Immobilien- und Beteiligungs AG
Landesbank Berlin – LBB/IBV Fonds
Landmark Invest Ltd.
Lange Vermögensberatung GmbH
Lange Vermögensberatung GmbH
Langenbahn AG
LBB-Fonds
LDG Capital Markets Company Limited
Lenz Immobilienhandel AG
Life
Lifetime Products Inc.
Liquid Asset Management Inc.
Lisser Consulting
Litz United GmbH & Co. KG
Locat – Projektsteuerung GmbH
Locstein Asset Management AG
Logotype Klostermann, Lässig
London Hong Kong Exchange plc
LPA Financial Services
LSC. Ltd.
Ltd. Ifi
LVA Garant Fund Inc.
Lichtenfels
Lenz
Leuze
Lengdorfer
Lutz
Marien
Möbius
Müller
Müller
Mohm
Morgenstern
Markof
Müller Dr.
Mathy
Müller
Miersch
Matten
24
Moulatsiotis
MichalMatthiesen
Milincic
Matthies
Merkens
Marx
Meyer
Madden Group Inc.
Magnus GmbH&CO KG
MALAYSIA Credit
Malaysiacredit Van Bergen Corp.
Mallorca Trading
Malmsbury, Harrington and Seaford
Maonara AG
Marine Shuttle AS
Marine Shuttle Operations Inc.
Mark Marketing S.R.O.
Matic-Verlagsgesellschaft mbH
Matterhorn International
Mayer und Cie GmbH
MC Management Consulting & Financial Services
MCC Mariaux Chevre & Cie
McKenzie-Boyle Associates
Med-Synergy Mallorca GmbH & Co. KG
Media Concepte
Media Inkassomanagement AG
Media-Com LTD & Co. KG
Medivest
MEG AG
Mercaforex – Silver Holdings International Ltd.
Mercantus AG
Mercury Forex Investments Assets Ltd.
Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd
METROPOL LEASING GMBH
MFIVE Ltd.
MFS 24
MG Beteiligungs AG
MICONA LTD.
MidAtlantic Holdings plc
Minera Real del Barqueno S.A.
Mitschka Alternative Advisory
MJS Developments S.A.
MK Service & Vertrieb
MK- Service & Vertrieb
MMC Medialog Marketing Company
MMCIS Investments
Mobilica.de
MOLY-FLON LIMITED
Money and Capital ASS.
Money Plus Worldwide Financial Limited
MonMach Marine Insurance Company Ltd.
Morgan Franklin Investment Inc.
MPC Capital
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
25
MPC Capital AG
Mueller Capital Management (MCM)
Multi Advisor Fund I GbR
MWB Vermögensverwaltungs AG
Mehler
MÖLLER-BÜCKINS
Montag
Morris
Manns
Meyer
Mundt
MILLS
McGregor
Müller
 Nicolic
Noske
Neumann
Naumann
Nieder
Noske
Nitsche
Natea Financial Transactions Division
Nationales Markenregister AG
Natur- und Erlebniswelt Schmölln GmbH
NEO TECH PUBLISHING COMPANY INC.
Net Mobile AG
Netsolutions FZE
NEUBERT & PARTNER FINANZMANAGEMENT GMBH
Neuburg Financial AG
Neue Medien GmbH
New Century Capital
NEW Naturpark und Erlebniswelt Schmölln
New World Financial
Newton Forest
Noble Advisory Group
Nodorf und Partner
Non plus ultra Marketing GmbH
Nord Finanz KG
Nord-Analyse/Jürgen Harksen
Nordcapital
Norddeutsche Vermögensverwaltung
North Am GmbH
NOVI BETEILIGUNGS GMBH
NUEVO GMBH
NWK Consulting
NYTS New York Trading Services Ltd.
Nünlist
Noack
 Ohles
Ohlmann
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
26
Obermann
Ohlenschläger
Ottersbach
O Online Casino
OBA OBJEKTPLANUNGS UND BAUGESELLSCHAFT MBH
Obtime GmbH
Ocean s Continental AG
EKOFINANZ PIPER & FISCHER (ÖKOFINANZ)
Offshore Shuttle AS
Olaf Tank – Rechtsanwalt
OLF OBERLAUSITZER FACTORING UND LEASING GMBH
OMNIKRON VERWALTUNGSGESELLSCHAFT MBH
Soldwisch
Optimal-Unternehmensgruppe
Opus one Corporation
Organi Juris GmbH
ORGANIJURIS HOLDING AG
Ost Com Holding AG
Ownership Emissionshaus
Ommer
Oberle
Olek
 Petrenko
Prehn
Piroth
Pelz
Pfeiffer
Piroth
Pirkel
Pirkel
Petsch
Pröckel
Pirkel
Pilling
Pirkel
Paco Integrated Energy Inc.
Pacon Capital S.A.
Pacta Invest GmbH
PACTA-INVEST GmbH
Partner Air Limited
Partner-Computer-Group Ltd.
PayPay Inc.
PayPay S.a.r.l.
PCG
Pentafox Höhn OHG
Pepper United S.R.O.
Perfect4u
Pharma Kontor AG
Phillip Alexander Securities & Futures Ltd.
Phoenix Kapitaldienst GmbH
Phönix Aktiengesellschaft
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
27
Phönix Finanzsanierungs AG
Platinum Group International
Platonja GmbH
Plim Cooperation AG
PLUS CONCEPT GMBH
Plus Finanz Consulting GmbH
Postbank Finanzberatung AG
PPV Produkt-Promotion-Vertrieb
Pradofin
Premium Capital
Premium Firmenservice GmbH
Prime Core AG
Prime Gold Invest AG
Prime Select AG
Primus Consulting Optionshandel GmbH
Prinz zu Hohenlohe Jagstberg & Banghard GmbH
Private Commercial Office (PCO)
Private Equity Capital Group
Private Equity Invest AG
Private Fiduciary Trust GmbH
Private Investment Brokers and Financial Fonds Inc.
PRIZMA F.A. CENTER
Profi Moderne Wohnungsbaugenossenschaft
Profit.sawas.info
Projekta GmbH
Projostar GmbH
Prokon Kapital GmbH
Protectas Vermögensberatung GmbH
Protected International Inc.
PS-Leasing
Piroth
Petry
 Quinz
QES – Die Geldarchitekten
Quantum Asset Management
Quatro Group
QUEEN GMBH
Quinz Jürgen
Quorum AG
 Riesen van
Reegen
Riviera
Rose
Reinke
Ruppert
Rautenberg
Rüdenauer
Rist
Röll
Rohde
Runyeon
Rieß de Sanchez
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
28
Rachensperger
Ramin
Rohde
Range
Reich
Rummelt
Runyeon
Reimers
Rohbeck
R&S GmbH
R.A.P. Vermögensanlagen-Aktiengesellschaft & Co. KG Immobilienverwaltung
Racingkasino.Com
Rainbow Real Estate Ltd.
Ralph Hübner Verlag
Ranston Ltd
Ranston Ltd.
Ravena Finanz Management AG
RDV GmbH
Real Estate AG
Rechtsanwalt Asmus
Register of Commerce – Markenregisterverzeichnis
Renko & Associates
Renta / Löwer
Rentmeister KG
Res Justitia GmbH
Residencia GmbH
Rheinisch Westfälische Grundbesitz AG
Richmond & Palmer Investments Inc
Riverblue GmbH
RK-invest intern. Ltd.
RKI Invest
RKV Finanzservice
Robyns Capital GmbH
Robyns Vermögensverwaltung GmbH
Rodman & Shaw Ltd.
Rontax-Treuhand
Rosiak Dr.
Ruhrstrom GmbH
Ruluso Holding Ltd.
Rushton Limited
Ruspa Capital AG
Ruyan Europe
Richter
Reime
Richtsteig
Rademann
Rippel
 Sälinger
Schwarz
Stefan
Storm
Seuchter
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
29
Seumenicht
Schaefer
Scholl
Siegert
Schuhmann
Scharl
STRÖMBERG
Stanley
Splisteser
Sablowski
Schwarz
Stumpf
Scholz
Steigenberger
Schmidt
Seebacher
Sümper
Steuten
Schwartz
Simon
Schrämli
Spilker
Spanier
Seci
Stolte
Stolte
Schmid
Schmid
Schroeder
Seidel
Schmidtlein
Stangl
Steinbach
Stecker
Szulc
Schäfer
Spilker
Scholl
Stadelmaier
Shadi
Schäfer
Schmidt
Schaul
Sulser -Eggenberger
Schwarz
Sch.
S.
Schroeder Dr.
Schierloh
Sinn
Soldwisch
Smith
Schmidt
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
30
Schrenk
Schieweck
Schmidt
S.
Schmid
S&K Deutsche Sachwert AG
S.B.E. Bank
S.B.E. Financial SA
S.L.I.C.E AG
Sachsen Planke GmbH
Sachsenpark AG
Safe Inrest Quota Obtain Ltd (auch bekannt unter SIQO)
Sagro
Sakura Financial Group
SAM FINANZ AG – Swiss Asset Management
San West Inc.
Sauer & Söhne
Saxonia Sparkasse Inc.
SBAG – Schweizerische Börsenabwicklungsgesellschaft mbH
Schmid Immobilien Ltd.
Schmiedendorf Arzneimittelvertrieb AG
Schuhbecks am Platzl GmbH
Schutzvereinigung der Versicherten, Sparer und Kapitalanleger e. V.
Schwabenland Büro
Schweizer Kapital AG
SCT Bank Ltd.
SD Global Equity AG & Co. KG
Seabed Invest AG
SEB Bank AG
Sebeka GmbH
Secured Communications Limited
Securenta AG
Securities Regulatory and Investment Board (SRIB)
Senior Invest
Servicebüro Natter
SFP Private Banking
SFR AG (Swiss Finance Research AG)
Sherwood Henderson Limited
Shibby & Partners
Sigma Leasing Ltd.
Sigma Trading Limited
Signature Equities Agency GmbH
Signum Edelsteine GmbH
Sisko System Haus AG
Skyline Advisory Group
Solatera Energy AG
Sole Invest GmbH
Solventa Finanzservice GmbH
Sophisticated Investor Inc.
SP Trade Investment Capital Ltd. / SP Trader Fund
Sparkasse Dortmund
Spree Finanz AG
Spree-Capital GmbH
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
31
Star Invest
Stebo GmbH
Steinberg Investment Research AG
Steinberg Investments Ltd.
Stephens Capital Markets Limited
Sterling Asset Management AG
STIFX (stifxonline.com)
Stifxonline.com
Stonehard Consulting d.o.o.
Stratton & Partner
Stratton Wainwright
Suisse Banking
Suisse Life Securities
Sunset Handelsgesellschaft Unternehmergesellschaft
SVK Marketing GmbH
SVM24Direkt
SWAG – Schweizerische Wertpapierabrechnungsgesellschaft AG
SWD Sächsischer Wirtschaftsdienst
Swiss Agricole Asset Management
Swiss Basis GmbH
Swiss Bellair Bank
Swiss Credit Trust AG
SWISS DIVISION
Swiss Finance Conceptions & Marketing AG
SWISS Finance Consult
Swiss Finance Consult AG
Swiss Finance Consult AG
Swiss Finance Research AG
Swiss Key Equity Consult AG
Swiss Lotto – Gesellschaft Schweizer Zahlenlotto
Swiss Lotto Agency
Swiss Lotto Highstakes
Swiss Marketing GmbH
Swiss Siam Investment Club
Swiss Trading
Swiss World Cyber Lottery International – Swiss Lottery
Swiss-American Capital Management Institute,Inc.
SwissAudit Aktiengesellschaft
SwissKap AG
Swisskontor GmbH
Swissridge International Corp.
Switzerland Investment Group
Süddeutsche Stabak AG
Süddeutsche Stabak Aktiengesellschaft AG
Südwestbank AG
System Vorsorge Kapitalvermittlung (SVK)
Schmuck
Simon
Schlag
Sonntag
Schellscheidt
Schildbach
Schmidt
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
32
Surowiec
 Tzolov
Tannenbaum
Thomson
Tucholke
Traxel
Teller
Trisl
TOBER
Tausch
Trice
Thimm
Turgut
Tank
T.K. Immobilien GmbH
Taipan
Talis Enterprise GmbH
Task Force Service GmbH
Taurus GmbH
TBC-Marketing AG
Telba GmbH
Tele Inside s.r.o.
Tellba GMBH
The Crown Group CH
The Vale Group / Vale Group InvestmentsVale Group Asset Management /
Thomas Moore
Titan
Titan Trading Group
TiViBo GmbH
Tortola Capital
Trade Direct GmbH
Transatlantic Business & Management Ltd.
TRC Telemedia e.K.
Treberhilfe Berlin gGmbH
Treff Hotel Beteiligung
Trend Capital AG
Treu-Control Wirtschaftsberatungs- und Treuhandgesellschaft mbH
Treulux AG
Tri-Hub International
Triagon Holding AG
Trias Erste KG
Trias Zweite KG
Trikom Consulting GmbH
Trinity Ventures
TSI Consulting
TSI-Consulting
Turner Mayfield Advisory A.G.
TVI Express
Two For 1 Sportsbook
TXL Business Academy GmbH
TXL Capital Management GmbH
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
33
Tang
Täubert
 Ullmann
Uhlendorff
UBS Deutschland AG
UFB VERMITTLUNGSGESELLSCHAFT MBH
UFP
UGV Inkasso
Ulrich Engler Daytrading
Ulrich Petry
ULRICH VERLAG KG
ULRICH- VERLAG KG
Unabhängige Wirtschaftskanzlei Wolfgang Gelbke
Unia Holding AG
Unia Industrie Holding AG
Unispar Banque PLC
United Invest Management Deutschland Ltd & Co. KG
United Investors
United Markets (Asia) Limited
United Network Industries (Uni AG)
United Re-Insurance Group
United Trust Bank Plc.
United Trust of Switzerland S.A
United Trust of Switzerland S.A.
Unitymedia Hessen GmbH & Co KG
Universal Settlements International (USI) Inc.
Univest Limited
Univesta
Univesta Björk Immobilien und Anlage GmbH & Co.
Unternehmensgruppe Esdinero
UOT Financial Services Limited
US GOLD INTERNATIONAL LTD.
US Securities Agency (USSA)
Usecom Software AG
 Volkmann
Völl
Vitor
Voß
van Dien
van Dyken
Voll
von Eugen
Varin
Varin
Vejpustek
Volk
Vogel
von Krauthahn
V-O-B Handelsgesellschaft mbH
V/F Operation Leasing GmbH
VABA AG
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
34
ValueMaker
VALUTA VERMÖGENSVERWALTUNG GMBH
VanFunds / Vandior Inc.
Vanilla
VCI
Ventana Biotech Inc.
Ventono Capital GmbH
Venture Associates
Verbraucherdienst.e.V
Verimount FZE
Versicherungsdienst
Vertex Commodities
Verum Placement Ltd.
Vierte Juragent GmbH & Co. Prozesskostenfonds KG
VIT EnvironmentSystems AG
Vitascanning AG
Viva Tenerife Services
Volkssolidarität Sozial-Immobilien GmbH
Volkssolidarität Sozialimmobilienfonds GmbH & Co. KG
 Wood
Wächter
Wintzler
Willer
Wiedenbauer
Walkemeyer
Weimer
Walkemeyer
Wolter
Wolter
Wagner
W.
Wagner
Wolfram
Wolfram
Werner Dr.
Wagner
Wulff
Wagner
Weislogel
Walker
Wagner
WABAG – Wirtschaftsanalyse und Beratung AG
Wagner Finanzvermittlung GmbH
Wahl + Partner GmbH
Warrick Management Group Ltd.
Waterman Associates
WBwso Ltd
Wconstrukt
Wealth and Asset Planning
Webtains GmbH
Weizman Associates
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
35
Weizman Associates LLC
Wellshire Securities GmbH
West Atlantic Credit Group
WESTGATE Financial AG
Westminster Financial Management Ltd
Weyhill Establishments
WFB sro
White Birds Germany GmbH
Whitherspoon, Seymour & Robinson Corp.
Who is Who Prominentenenzyklopädie AG
WIBAG Immobilien und Beteiligung Aktiengesellschaft
Wicon Wirtschafts- und Finanzkontor Betz & Kronacher Beteiligungsgesellschaft
WIETEC-Germany
WIG – Wirtschaftszentrale für Industrie und Gewerbe AG
WIHH – Wirtschaftsinstitut für Industrie, Handel, Handwerk AG
WILL GMBH FINANZBERATUNG & VERWALTUNG
William Smith Partners
Wilton Investment Group
WiRe AG
Wirtschafts- und Finanzberatung Lindow-Giebel
Wirtschaftskanzlei Jilg GmbH
Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft Contor GmbH
WNB Finanzanlagen AG
Wohnbaufinanz
Wohnungsbaugesellschaft Leipzig West AG
Wohnungsbaugesellschaft Leipzig-West AG
Wonsei AG
Woodbridge Business Corp.
World Capital Group
World Capital Holding Corporation
WORLD MEDIA FONDS
World Telecom Data
WorldClearing Holding Inc.
Worldexchange
WorldFX-club
WSR – Whitherspoon, Seymour & Robinson Corporation
Würzburger Aktiengesellschaft für Vermögensbeteiligungen und Verwaltung (WAG)
 X Com Ltd.
Ximex Executive Ltd
XYZ NOMINEES LTD
 Y2M Media Limited
YESILADA BANK LTD.
Young Media Spain S.L.
Yuca Park
 Ziedd
Zeitler
Zürbis
Zimmermann
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
Zimmermann
Zürbis
Zietlow
Zürbis
Zollweg
Zürbis
Zensen-Döring
Z.E.N.I.T. AG
ZAK Inkasso
Zapf Creation
ZBI Zentral Boden Immobilien AG
ZDR-Datenregister GmbH
ZeBo GmbH
ZECH & ZECH VERMÖGENSVERWALTUNG GMBH
Zeder Immobilien Treuhand AG
ZEDER INVESTMENT AG
Zenith Commodities Ltd
ZENKER WOHNBAU AG
Zentrum für Wirtschaftspraxis
Zinnwald Financiers
Zucomex The Zurich Commodities Exchange
Zurich Capital Gruppe
Zurich Direct

Opfer in 2011:

– Angela Merkel

– Wolfgang Schäuble

– Accessio AG

– Allianz Global Investors

– Antek International

– Andreas Decker

– Anna Schwertner

– Bank of America

– Barclays

– Bernd Müller

– Bernd Pulch

– Beluga

– Bliznet Group Inc.

– Centrum Immobilien

– Citigroup

– Coldwell Banker

– Commerzbank

– CPA Capital Partners

– Credit Suisse

– CSA

– CWI

– Debiselect

– D.E.U.S.eG – Jürgen Oswald

– Deutsche Bank

– Deutsche Anstalt für Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht

– DKB Bank

– Dr. Paul Jensen

– Ekrem Redzepagic

– Erste Mai GmbH

– Express Kurier Europa

– Financial Services Regulatory Authority of Frankfurt

– FRONTAL 21

– Garbe

– General Global Media

– Genfer Kreditanstalt

– HCI

– HSBC

– HypoLeasing

– Indara

– JPMorgan Chase

– Kreis Sparkasse Tübingen

– Leipziger Bauträger (etliche Firmen, hier subsummiert)

– Lloyds Bank

– Lothar Berresheim

– Martina Oeder

– Martin Sachs

– Meridian Capital

– Money Pay

– Norinchukin Bank

– Oak Tree

– Prime Estate

– Prosperia Mephisto 1 GmbH & Co KG

– Raiffeisen- und Volksbanken

– Rothmann & Cie.

– Stefan Schramm

– Teldafax

– TipTalk.com

– Wirecard

Natürlich alles OHNE IRGENDEINEN BEWEIS VON VORBESTRAFTEN SERIENBETRÜGERN AUF EINER HOMEPAGE MIT KEINER ECHTEN PERSON IM IMPRESSUM STATTDESSEN MIT EINER NEW YORKER BRIEFKASTENADRESSE IM AUFTRAG MUTMASSLICH VON RA JOCHEN RESCH UND RA MANFRED RESCH, PETER EHLERS UND GERD BENNEWIRTZ -UND UNTER MITARBEIT VON GOOGLE, DEUTSCHLAND,

ALS “FRONTMANN” VON “GOMOPA” AGIERT DER DUTZENDWEISE VORBESTRAFTE KLAUS MAURISCHAT UNTER ANDEREM WEGEN BETRUGES AN SEINEM EIGENEN ANLEGER

Das Urteil gegen„GoMoPa“-Maurischat: Betrug am eigenen Anleger wg € 10.000,-

110401 6 GoMoPa SJB Opferlisteh
Die Verurteilung von Klaus Maurischat und Mark Vornkahl wegen Betruges am eigenen Anleger Klaus Maurischat und Mark Vornkahl, Betreiber vonwww.gomopa.net: Am 24. April 2006 war die Verhandlung am Amtsgericht Krefeld in der Betrugssache: Mark Vornkahl / Klaus Maurischat ./. Dehnfeld. Aktenzeichen: 28 Ls 85/05 Klaus MaurischatLange Straße 3827313 Dörverden.Das in diesem Verfahren ausschließlich diese Betrugsache verhandelt wurde, ist das Urteil gegen Klaus Maurischat recht mäßig ausgefallen.Zusammenfassung der Verhandlung vom 24.04.2006 vor dem Schöffengericht des AG Krefeld in der Sache gegen Klaus Maurischat und Mark Vornkahl.Zur Hauptverhandlung erschienen:Richter Dr. Meister, 2 Schöffen,Staatsanwalt, Angeklagter Klaus Maurischat, vertr. durch RA Meier, Berlin; aus der U-Haft zur Verhandlung überführt.1. Eine Gerichtsvollzieherin stellt unter Ausschuss der Öffentlichkeit eine Urkunde an den Angeklagten Maurischat zu.2. Bei Mark Vornkahl wurde im Gerichtssaal eineTaschenpfändung vorgenommen.Beginn der HauptverhandlungDie Beklagten verzichten auf eine Einlassung zu Beginn.Nach Befragung des Zeugen Denfeld zum Sachverhalt wurde dieVerhandlung auf Wunsch der Staatsanwaltschaft und den Verteidigern unterbrochen.Der Angeklagte Maurischat gab nach Fortsetzung derHauptverhandlung Folgendes zu Protokoll:Er sähe ein, dass das Geld auf das falsche Konto gegangen sei und nicht dem eigentlichen Verwendungszweck zugeführt wurde. Das Geld sei aber zurückgezahlt worden und er distanziere sich ausdrücklich von einem Betrug.Schließung der BeweisaufnahmeDer Staatsanwalt verließt sein PlädoyerEr halte am Vorwurf des Betruges fest. Mit Hinweis auf die einschlägigen Vorstrafen des Angekl. Maurischatund auf laufende Ermittlungsverfahren, beantrage er ein Strafmaß von 1 Jahr und 6 Monaten.Er halte dem Angeklagten zu Gute, dass dieserWiedergutmachung geleistet habe, und dass dieser geständig war. Zudem läge die letzte Verurteilung wegen Betruges 11 Jahre zurück. Auch sei der Geschädigte nicht in existentielle Not geraten, wobei der Staatsanwalt nicht über noch laufende Verfahren hinweg sehen könne. Er läge aber dem Angeklagten Maurischat nahe, keine weiteren Aktivitäten im Bezirk der Staatsanwaltschaft Krefeld auszuüben, insbesondere möchte er, dass keine weiteren Anleger im Bezirk der Staatsanwaltschaft Krefeld durch GoMoPa akquiriert werden.Die Freiheitsstrafe soll zur Bewährung ausgesetzt werden.Plädoyer des Verteidigers des Angekl. Maurischat, Herrn RA MeierEr schließe sich, wie (in der Unterbrechung) vereinbart, dem Staatsanwalt an.Es stimme, dass sein Mandant Fehler in seiner Vergangenheit gemacht habe, und dass er auch diesmal einen Fehler begangen haben könnte, jedoch sei der Hinweis wichtig, dass sein Mandant aus diesen Fehlern gelernt habe.Der Angeklagte haben das letzte Wort.Maurischat sagt, es sei bereits alles gesagt worden.Unterbrechung zu Hauptverhandlung. Der Richter zieht sich mit den Schöffen zur Beratung zurück.Urteilsverkündung:Der Angeklagte wird des gemeinschaftlichen Betrugs für schuldig befunden.Der Angeklagte Klaus Maurischat wird zu einerFreiheitsstrafe von 1 Jahr und 6 Monaten verurteilt. Diese wird zur Bewährung ausgesetzt.Die Bewährungszeit wird auf 3 Jahre festgesetzt.Der Haftbefehl gegen Klaus Maurischat wird aufgehoben.Der Angeklagte trage die Kosten des Verfahrens.UrteilsbegründungDer Richter erklärt, dass eine Täuschung des Geschädigtenvorliegt und somit keine Untreue in Betracht kommen kann.Die Fragen, ob es sich um einen Anlagebetrug handele sei irrelevant. Er hält den Angeklagten die geleistete Wiedergutmachung zu Gute.Ebenso ist das Geständnis für die Angeklagten zu werten. Zudem liegt die letzte Verurteilung des Angeklagten Maurischat 11 Jahre zurück.Die Parteien verzichten auf Rechtsmittel. Das Urteil ist somit rechtskräftig.Mit dem heutigen Urteil endet ein Kapitel in derBetrugssache Goldman Morgenstern & Partners, Klaus Maurischat und Mark Vornkahl.Alle GoMoPa.net Verantwortlichen, Maurischat, Vornkahl und Henneberg sind nun vorbestrafte Abzocker und Betrüger und die Zukunft der Pseudoklitsche GoMoPa.net sieht duster aus.Mir dem Geständnis der beiden ABZOCKER MAURISCHAT UND VORNKAHL vor Gericht bricht ein jahrelangaufrechterhaltenes Lügengeflecht von einigen primitiven Betrügern zusammen. Gewohnheitsverbrecher und Denunzianten,die rechtschaffene Personen und Firmen in ihren Verbrecherforen kriminalisierten.

STATEMENT: Peter Ehlers and “GoMoPa”‘s “Shithousefly Blog”

Dear Readers,

I do not like to bother you at all with “Shithouse  Blogs”  but I represent a silent and fast growing  majority of honest people and companies who have been blackmailed by the serial fraudsters and cyberstalkers of the criminal East-Berlin  “GoMoPa” organisation.

These people asked me to report about the newest facts.

Therefore I unveil here new facts about these criminals to protect and to serve these people, their families, friends and companies:

It came to our attention that “GoMoPa” seems to be a very close ally of Peter Ehlers from Hamburg.

Meanwhile a lot of people doubt this identity is true.

The so-called “Peter Ehlers” has accused the German Chancellor Angela Merkel and the German Minister of Finance, Wolfgang Schäuble and their processors, former Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder and former Minister of Finance, Peer Steibrück to be large scale criminals,  fraudsters and concealers.

Furthermore they distribute in Peter Ehlers and Klaus Maurischats  “Shithousefly Blog” real shitty news which just copy the real facts from Meridian Capital’s press release about the “Super-Shithousefly Klaus Maurischat detention and fake my name into it.

As you all are aware the German Criminal Police is investigating these and many many more dirty deeds of these “Super-Shithouseflies.”

The case numbers are numerous. The last one is: ST/0148943/2011

We keep you informed.

Sincerely yours

Magister Bernd Pulch

P.S. You all know what happens with “Super-Shitflies”…

Der Beweis: Magisterarbeit Bernd Pulch – http://www.kepplinger.de/node/50 – HOMEPAGE DES DOZENTEN

Liebe Leser,

hier der Beweis für meine Magisterarbeit auf der Webseite meines betreuenden Dozenten, Noelle-Neumann-Nachfolgers und LeiterS des

Institutes für Publizistik an der Universität Mainz, Dr. Hans Mathias Kepplinger:

Webseite:

http://www.kepplinger.de/node/50

Dr. Hans Mathias Kepplinger

Professor für Empirische Kommunikationsforschung
am Institut für Publizistik der Universität Mainz

Magisterarbeiten N-Z

Neubauer, Frank Richard
Die Presse- und Öffentlichkeitsarbeit der Bundesvereinigung der deutschen Arbeitgeberverbände unter besonderer Berücksichtigung des Bereichs Lobbying
Oktober 1995

Neumann, Barbara
Welche Selektionsmöglichkeiten gibt es zu bestimmten Zeiten im Hörfunk? Eine Inhaltsanalyse des in Köln empfangbaren Hörfunkprogramms vom 15. bis 31. März 1983
Aug. 1984

Nickels, Margret
Zeit und Raum im Film
April 1981

Nicolai, Axel
Herkunftsprofile von Mitarbeitern in Werbeagenturen
Juni 1995

Nies, Ulrich
Die optische Darstellung von Helmut Schmidt und Hans-Dietrich Genscher in der Bildberichterstattung des STERN während der Bundestagswahlkämpfe 1980 und 1982/83
Oktober 1985

Nuppeney, Burkhard
Arbeitsplatzbeschreibung einer Zeitungsredaktion
1978

Obergethmann, Jörg
Die Darstellung von Sieg und Niederlage in der Sportberichterstattung deutscher und österreichischer Tageszeitungen
März 1986

Oechsner, Sibylle
Die Freiwillige Selbstkontrolle Fernsehen (FSF)
März 1994

Oess, Markus
Public Relations für Banken
November 1995

Ohl, Gabriela
Selbstdarstellung und Fremddarstellung von Politikern in Tageszei-tungen. Eine Inhaltsanalyse der Presseberichterstattung während des Bundestagswahlkampfes 1976
März 1980

Ohliger, Angelika
Berufswege von Studienabbrechern – Befragung ehemaliger Studenten der Publizistik
März 1980

Pankowski, Holger
Medien im Meinungsstreit – Die erste Frankfurter Oberbürgermeister-Direktwahl im Spiegel der lokalen Presse und des hessischen Fernsehens
1997

Patzer, Karl-Heinz
Theorien der Nachrichtenauswahl. Systematische Darstellung empirischer Studien
Dezember 1985

Peter, Susanne
Expertenurteile über ausgewählte Print- und TV-Medien
Juni 1998

Peterhanwahr, Ralf
Jockel Fuchs als Chefredakteur der rheinland-pfälzischen SPD-Zeitung “Die Freiheit” während der Jahre 1957-1962
Februar 1995

Peters, Elke
Die Presseberichterstattung vor dem Rücktritt von Ministerpräsident Filbinger
April 1983

Pfeifer, Andreas
Funktion und Wirkung der Typographie, Herkunft, Lesbarkeit und Anmutung lateinischer Druckschriften
Februar 1993

Piella, Wulf
Der Einfluß von Erwartungen auf die Berichterstattung nach einem Ereignis – Am Beispiel der Fußballberichterstattung regionaler Zeitungen
1996

Pleines, Harald
Qualifikation von Ratsmitgliedern – Am Beispiel von Rüsselsheim
Oktober 1982

Pohlmann, Dirk
Begriff des Intellektuellen
Januar 1990

Pöttgens, Stephanie
Franz Alt. Biographie eines Journalisten
Juni 1989

Preikschat, Alfred
Die aktuelle Berichterstattung über die Friedensbewegung. Eine Untersuchung der Tagespresse und des Hörfunks zur Validierung eines inhaltsanalytischen Verfahrens
April 1988

Pulch, Bernd
Dolf Zillmanns Studien zur ‘Emotional-Arousal-Theory’
Januar 1987

Puschatzky, Yvonne
Prominentenprofile. Eine Analyse des FAZ-Fragebogens
September 1996

Püttmann, Jürgen
Deutschsprachige Hörfunksendungen ausländischer Sender. Eine Inhaltsanalyse
Oktober 1988

Quoos, Swantje
Die Leser des Spiegel 1949-1994
September 1995

Rausch, Astrid
Lifestyle als Mittel der Zielgruppensegmentierung in der Werbung
August 1995

Reigber, Dieter
Die regionale/lokale Berichterstattung des ERSTEN PRIVATEN FERNSEHENS und der Tageszeitungen im Bereich des Kabelpilotprojekts Ludwigshafen/Vorderpfalz – Ein inter-/ intramedialer Vergleich
Mai 1989

Rethelford, Peter
Blockwerbung oder Einzelspotstreuung? Experimentelle Untersuchung zur Wirkungsweise alternativer TV-Publikationsweisen
März 1987

Riedl, Peter
Problemlösungskompetenz der Parteien und Thematisierung von Problemen im Landtagswahlkampf in Baden-Württemberg 1988
September 1990

Rindsfüsser, Karsten
Die Darstellung des Journalismus in Heinrich Bölls “Die verlorene Ehre der Katharina Blum”
Oktober 1993

Rode, Utta
Pressekonzentration und journalistische Qualität
März 1984

Rofalski, Peter
Die Umstrukturierung der Unternehmenskommunikation bei Hoechst
Februar 2000

Rosenthal, Matthias
Der Einfluß von Sympathie oder Antipathie auf das journalistische Verhalten von Tageszeitungsredakteuren bei Konflikten um Politiker
April 1987

Rössler, Bernhard
Product Placement oder Unterbrecherwerbung? Der Einfluß der Präsentationsform eines Werbereizes auf Erinnerung und Beurteilung
März 1994

Sauer, Heike
Geschäftsberichte von Kommunikationsmedium zur Unternehmensdarstellung
August 1992

Schäfer, Markus
Komik im Fernsehen – Entwicklung eines Analyseinstrumentes
September 1995

Schäfer-Talanga, Gudrun
Der Journalist Werner Holzer
April 1990

Schaus, Anabel
Selbstkritik von Journalisten und Wissenschaftlern
Juli 1992

Schermuly, Gabi
Die Gesundheitsreform in der Presse
Oktober 1993

Scheufele, Bertram
Die Skandalierung von Günter Krause
November 1996

Schilling, Rainer
Die internationale Diskussion um den “free flow of information”
Juli 1982

Schindler, Winfried
Fotografien von Ronald Reagan und Leonid Breschnew im STERN und TIME-MAGAZINE
Dezember 1985

Schlarb, Armin
Politische Instrumentalisierung der Medien. Literaturstudie zum Wandel der politischen Kommunikation in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland
Juni 1988

Schlüter, Elmar
Darstellung von Sexualmoral in den Massenmedien
Oktober 1985

Schmitt, Christiane
Die Entwicklung des “AIDS-Blut-Skandals” 1993
Dezember 1994

Schmitt, Iris
Motive für den Konsum von Horrorvideos bei Jugendlichen
Juli 1989

Schmitt-Egenolf, Andreas
Individualkommunikation in neuen Netzen – Technische und historische Entwicklung der Telematik sowie Überlegungen zu deren Stand und Perspektive in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland
Juli 1988

Schmitz, Lothar
Der Einfluß von Massenmedien auf die Relevanz von Urteilskriterien (Priming)
Februar 1993

Schneider, Hans-Jürgen
Der optische Eindruck von Politikern. Experimenteller Vergleich zwischen Fernseh- und Hörfunkauftritten von Schmidt, Genscher, Strauß und Kohl
Dezember 1983

Schraewer, Claudia
Rhetorische Mittel bei der Skandalierung von Linda Reisch
Juli 2000

Schreck, Jutta
Einzelfallstudien zur Pressekonzentration
August 1986

Schriefers, Annette
Ansichten der Bevölkerung zur Rolle und zur Arbeitsweise von Journalisten
März 1992

Schröter, Frauke
Die Nachrüstungsdebatte in der Prawda
Oktober 1985

Schuck, Petra
Mißbrauch von Pressefotos – Literaturbericht
Oktober 1985

Schué, Severin
Die Darstellung von Medizin im Fernsehen
Mai 1995

Schug, Markus
Vergleichende Untersuchung der Lokalberichterstattung der beiden Mainzer Tageszeitungen
Juni 1993

Schulze, Andreas
Kultursponsoring in Deutschland
Februar 1995

Schwarz, Michael
Das Fernsehen in Jamaica
August 1990

Schweizer, Marie-Theres
Die Jugendfilmarbeit im Dritten Reich
Juli 1982

Selbka, Iwona
Beiträge polnischer Wissenschaftler zur Kommunikationsforschung
August 1984

Semela, Eva
Welche ökonomischen Auswirkungen auf die öffentlich-rechtlichen Rundfunkanstalten besitzt die Einführung privaten Fernsehens?
September 1991

Sempert, Petra
Frageverhalten und Publikumsreaktion in Talkshows
Mai 1986

Severin, Petra
Geschlechterrollen und Lebensstile in der Werbung in Stern und Bunte von 1965 bis 1990. Eine Inhaltsanalyse der Werbeanzeigen in den beiden Zeitschriften Stern und Bunte
März 1991

Sidenstein, Ute
Gottfried Sello als Kunstkritiker in ‘Die Zeit’ von 1958 bis 1985
Oktober 1989

Siehl, Carsten
Virtuelle Realität. Grundlagen, Anwendungsbereiche und Kommunikationsaspekte einer neuen Medientechnologie
Juni 1995

Simons, Christian
Profil und Funktion der On-Air-Promotion. Eine Strukturanalyse der Programmwerbungen im deutschen Fernsehen
Juni 1996

Sinning, Hilka
Nachrichtenwerte – Die historische Entwicklung eines Forschungskonzeptes
Juli 1980

Spanier, Julia
Ausstrahlungseffekte von emotionalisierenden Werbespots
September 1993

Spiel, Ralph
Die Entwicklung der Filmtheater in der BRD seit 1970
Februar 1993

Staab, Christina
Der Bildungskandidat. Eine Analyse der Bewerbungsunterlagen zur Sendung ‘Der große Preis’
Dezember 1994

Staab, Joachim Friedrich
Der Einfluß der Pressestruktur auf die Berichterstattung über die Bundestagswahlen 1969-1983 aus der Sicht der Kandidaten
März 1985

Stein, Dorothee
Die Darstellung von Konrad Adenauer in der BRD während seiner Kanzlerzeit. Dargestellt am Beispiel der Berichterstattung der FAZ und des Nachrichtenmagazins Der Spiegel
Januar 1981

Stein, Simone
Horst Keller – Europa als Auftrag für einen Journalisten
Oktober 1994

Steinbach, Alexander
Präsentationselemente und Nachrichtenrezeption – Framing von Medieninhalten
September 1998

Steinborn, Annette
Die Bedeutung der Attributions-theorie für die Kommunikationswissenschaft
August 1986

Stienert, Heike
Vergleichende Analyse der Haus- und Kundenzeitschriften öffentlich-rechtlicher Rundfunkanstalten der Bundesrepublik Deutschland
November 1991

Stolz, Hans-Georg
Die redaktionelle Linie ausgewählter Publikationsorgane
August 1987

Storz, Sigrid
Der Einfluß von Bild und Text auf die Problemwahrnehmung und Ursachenzuschreibung von Fernsehzuschauern – Am Beispiel eines Beitrags über Umweltverschmutzung
Februar 1992

Strampe, Karsten
Gewerkschaftsarbeit im Rundfunk (Hörfunk und Fernsehen)
April 1980

Streicher, Jürgen
Der Stern und sein Gründer
März 1986

Streit, Achim
Gründe für Kommunikationskontrolle in Deutschland zwischen Reformation und Restauration
November 1986

Sturny, Dirk
Einfluß von Krisen-Typen auf Publikationsweisen. Eine Input-Output-Analyse anhand von zwei Beispielen
August 1997

Swoboda, Thilo
Der Einfluß von Medien auf politische Entscheidungen. Eine Befragung ehemaliger Bundestagsabgeordneter
August 1995

Szadzik, Carmen
Der Computer als Befragungsinstrument im persönlichen Interview und bei Selbstausfüllersystemen
Oktober 1993

Tesch, Roland
Die Wahrnehmung von Vergewaltigungsszenen im Fernsehen
Mai 1994

Topp, Elisabeth
Schemageleitete Rezeption von Hörfunk- und Zeitungsnachrichten
November 1991

Trares, Simone
Das “Luder” – eine Charaterfiktion der Boulevardpresse
April 2003

Tronsgard, Derek
Der Einfluss von Frames auf die Wirkung von Meldungen über die Gewalt gegen Ausländer
April 2003

Tscherner, Christine
Bedingungen von Thematisierungseffekten
September 1998

Tschullik, Astrid
Der publizistische Umgang von Journalisten mit Sozio- und Kultursponsoring
1994

Tullius, Christiane
Validierung von Inhaltsanalyse durch Tendenzeinschätzung
Oktober 1991

Unold, Michaela
Die Wirkung von Gewaltdarstellungen: Der relative Einfluß des Ereignisses – real vs. fiktional – bzw. der Darstellungsform – künstlich vs. natürlich – auf die Rezipienten
November 1989

Volb, Andrea
Journalisten-Preise in Deutschland
März 2000

Vollbracht, Matthias
Die Entwicklung der Werbeerlöse der öffentlich-rechtlichen Rundfunkanstalten in der Konkurrenz zu den privaten Anbietern
September 1993

Vondano, Ursula
Die kommunikationspolitischen Konzepte von CDU/CSU, SPD und FDP
Juli 1982

Wang, Yuquan
Entwicklung des chinesischen Fernsehens seit der Öffnungspolitik 1978
Januar 1999

Weiß, Christina
Image und Unternehmenskommunikation. Eine Image-Untersuchung über den Caritas-Verband Wiesbaden e.V.
Juli 1995

Weißbecker, Helga
Die Veränderungen der Themenschwerpunkte in den Hörfunk-Nachrichten des HR von 1955 bis 1985
Juni 1989

Wenderoth, Axel
Die wissenschaftliche Begleitforschung zu den Kabelpilotprojekten in Ludwigshafen, München, Dortmund und Berlin
Mai 1988

Weyand, Hans Arno
Redakteure von Anzeigenblättern
Dezember 1989

Winckler, Stefan
Der Journalist Gerhard Löwenthal
November 1994

Winkel, Julia
Von den Alternativzeitungen der 70er zu den Stadtmagazinen der 90er Jahre
März 1999

Winning, Karin
Konflikt zwischen Bild und Text. Experimentelle Untersuchung der Urteilsbildung
Januar 1985

Wolf, Marion
Die Mediennutzung in Deutschland seit 1945 – Eine Zusammenstellung von Literatur zu diesem Thema
April 1980

Wolf, Stefanie
Formale Gestaltung und inhaltliche Ausrichtung der FAZ, Welt, SZ 1951-1996
November 2001

Wolter, Renate
Zum Einfluß der bild- oder textorientierten Mediennutzung auf das Wissen und Verhalten von Vorschulkindern
November 1990

Wright, Claudia Sophie
Die Darstellung der Gentechnik in der Presse der USA. Eine vergleichende Analyse
März 1992

Zech, Stefan
Berufsverständnis von Motor-Journalisten
Juni 1993

Ziesemer, Dominique
Gründe für TV-Umschaltverhalten
April 1996

Zock, Peter
Planung und Realisierung der Unterhaltungssendung “Showfenster”
Mai 1991

Zwiebelberg, Martin
Die Darstellung von Rudolf Scharping in der Tagespresse
1997

DAS “HANDELSBLATT” ÜBER DIE FINGIERTEN “GoMoPa” – MUTMASSLICHE PARTNER VON PETER EHLERS UND GERD BENNEWIRTZ

http://www.handelsblatt.com/finanzen/boerse-maerkte/boerse-inside/finanzaufsicht-untersucht-kursachterbahn-bei-wirecard/3406252.html

DER BEWEIS: DIE FREI ERFUNDENEN LÜGENMÄRCHEN VON STASI-“GoMoPA” UND IHREN BLOGS WIE SCHE*SSHAUSFLIEGENBLOG-EXTREMNEWS UND DIE BEWERTUNG

DIE FREI ERFUNDENEN “GoMoPa”-LÜGEN: FALL PROFESSOR MINISTER STELTER

IMMOVATION AG: Frei erfundene Behauptungen des “Informationsdienstes” GoMoPa im Zusammenhang mit angeblichem Sturz des früheren brandenburgischen Ministers Prof. Schelter – Einstweilige Verfügung beantragt

Kassel (ots) – Erneut wehrt sich die Kasseler IMMOVATION Immobilien Handels AG, ein seit über zwei Jahrzehnten sehr erfolgreiches, bundesweit tätiges Unternehmen der Immobilienbranche, gegen die unverändert anhaltende Schmutzkampagne des sogenannten “Informationsdienstes” GoMoPa (mit Sitz im Ausland), dessen Gründer und “CEO” Klaus Maurischat ebenso wie Mitgründer Mark Vornkahl bereits wegen Betrugs verurteilt wurden. Der 2006 rechtskräftig verurteilte Maurischat gab sogar gegenüber dem Handelsblatt weitere Verurteilungen zu (Handelsblatt vom 07.04.2010), woraufhin das Handelsblatt wörtlich konkludierte: “Es ist allerdings nicht das erste Mal, dass GoMoPa-Vertreter ins Zwielicht geraten”.GoMoPa suggerierte am 16. August 2010 in einer “Pressemitteilung”, dass IMMOVATION-Vorstandsmitglied Lars Bergmann sogar für den Sturz und das Karriereende des früheren brandenburgischen Ministers Professor Dr. Kurt Schelter durch Immobiliengeschäfte verantwortlich zeichne. In diesem Zusammenhang verweist die IMMOVATION AG auf eine schriftliche Mitteilung von Professor Dr. Kurt Schelter vom 18. August 2010:”Diesen Zusammenhang gibt es nicht. Ich kenne Herrn Bergmann nicht und habe mit ihm persönlich keine Immobiliengeschäfte abgeschlossen. Mir ist auch nicht bekannt, dass Herr Bergmann etwa mit Verkäufern der von mir damals erworbenen Immobilien persönlich oder institutionell in Verbindung stand oder steht. Ich halte dies für ausgeschlossen.”Minister a.D. Professor Dr. Kurt SchelterDie IMMOVATION AG hat dieser eindeutigen Mitteilung von Herrn Professor Schelter nichts hinzuzufügen und unterstreicht erneut ihr volles Vertrauen in die Fähigkeit ihrer Klienten, Mitarbeiter und Vertriebspartner, sich selbst ein entsprechendes Bild von dieser Schmutzkampagne machen zu können, in der es dem Autor dieser verleumderischen GoMoPa-”Pressemitteilung” zudem nicht einmal gelang, das Amt des betreffenden Ministers korrekt zu bezeichnen: Im Gegensatz zu seiner Bezeichnung bei GoMoPa war Herr Professor Schelter nicht Finanzminister, sondern Minister der Justiz und für Europaangelegenheiten des Landes Brandenburg.Die IMMOVATION AG hat im Zusammenhang mit dieser und zahlreichen weiteren unzutreffenden Behauptungen in dieser “Pressemitteilung” heute, 24.08.2010, beim Landgericht Berlin eine einstweilige Verfügung u. a. gegen Goldmann Morgenstern & Partners Consulting LLC (New York) und die GoMoPa GmbH (Berlin) beantragt. Mit der Verfügung soll den Antragsgegnern untersagt werden, die grob diffamierende Pressemitteilung zu verbreiten oder verbreiten zu lassen.Ausschüttung der Genussrechte

Zum sechsten Mal in Folge schüttete die Kasseler IMMOVATION AG die Rendite aus den Genussrechten an ihre rund 1.500 Anleger in Deutschland und Österreich aus. Über 1,91 Mio. Euro wurden für das Jahr 2009 an die Anleger pünktlich per 31.07.2010 ausbezahlt. Informationen zu weiteren aktuellen Themen finden Sie auf der Homepage der IMMOVATION AG: http://www.immovation-ag.de

PRESSE-ERKLÄRUNG: MUTMASSLICHE NEO-STASI ENTTARNT. SEHR VIELE OPFER.MORDAUFTRAG GEGEN MICH.

Liebe Leser,

wir bedanken uns für Ihre Anteilnahme, Informationen und Spenden.

Heute wurde von der BILD-Zeitung enthüllt, dass Julia Tomoschenko, eine pro-westliche Politikerin und ehemalige Kanzlerin der Ukraine mit einem Dioxin-Attentat vergiftet wurde.

Dies geschah auch mit dem Päräsidenten der Ukraine. Siehe nachfolgender Artikel aus Wikipedia – und mutmasslich auch mit Heinz Gerlach !

Die deutsche Zelle der Giftmörder wird mutmasslich von “GoMOPa” gesteuert – einer Neo-STASI-Einheit von STASI-Oberst-Stelzer (siehe zahlreiche Dokumente auf dieser Webseite).

Wir wissen: Es gibt auch einen STASI-Mord-Auftrag gegen mich.

Jetzt hier zur dem Mord-Versuch in der Ukraine:

Seit September 2004 leidet Juschtschenko an einer Krankheit, die seine Organe lebensgefährlich angegriffen und sein Gesicht entstellt hat. Erste Anzeichen der Krankheit wurden am 6. September 2004 festgestellt, als Wiktor Juschtschenko ins Krankenhaus eingeliefert wurde. Am Abend zuvor hatte er sich zu einem Abendessen mit Ihor Smeschko, dem Chef des ukrainischen Inlandsgeheimdienstes, und dessen Stellvertreter Wolodymyr Sazjuk getroffen. Während der Nacht nach diesem Treffen auf Sazjuks Datscha traten die ersten Symptome der Vergiftung auf: Juschtschenko litt unter Unterleibs- und Rückenschmerzen, Gesichtsmuskeln waren gelähmt, er erbrach häufig. Vier Tage später ließ er sich in das Wiener Rudolfinerhaus bringen. Die Ärzte dort stellten Entzündungen in Magen, Dünndarm, Bauchspeicheldrüse und im Ohr fest. Die Leber war geschwollen und ein Gesichtsnerv gelähmt. In einem Zwischenbericht vom 16. September vermuteten die Ärzte als Ursache „chemische Substanzen, die sich üblicherweise nicht als Bestandteil in Lebensmitteln befinden“.[2]

Juschtschenko fiel im Präsidentschaftswahlkampf vier Wochen lang aus. Über die Gründe wurde offiziell nichts bekannt, dennoch kursierten erste Meldungen über eine mögliche Vergiftung. In Wien ließ er sich ein zweites Mal vom 30. September bis 10. Oktober behandeln, aber erst am 11. Dezember, nach einer weiteren Untersuchung, gaben die behandelnden Ärzte im Rudolfinerhaus bekannt, dass es sich bei der Erkrankung Juschtschenkos um eine Dioxinvergiftung handelt. Ihren Angaben zufolge fand man in Juschtschenkos Blut und Gewebe mindestens das Tausendfache der normalen Konzentration an Dioxin.[3] (Laut einer wissenschaftlichen Studie vom August 2009 hatte die Dioxinkonzentration sogar den 50.000-fachen Normalwert betragen.[4])

Ab Dezember 2004 war Juschtschenko bei einem Schweizer Ärzteteam um den Professor Jean-Hilaire Saurat in Behandlung, einem Dermatologen am Universitätsspital Genf. Das wurde erst im Juni 2008 bekannt, als die Ärzte auf Wunsch Juschtschenkos Auskunft über die Behandlung ihres Patienten gaben. Demnach war der ukrainische Präsidentschaftskandidat mit 2 bis 5 Milliliter Dioxin vergiftet worden. Dass er nicht gestorben ist, sei unter anderem der Tatsache zu verdanken, dass er sich kurz nach Aufnahme des Gifts übergab. Zur Entfernung seiner Narben habe Juschtschenko innerhalb dreier Jahre 25 Operationen in Vollnarkose über sich ergehen lassen. Zudem habe das Ärzteteam ein Enzym entdeckt, welches den Abbau von Dioxin bewirke. Inzwischen seien 90 Prozent des Dioxins aus dem Körper des Patienten entfernt worden.[5]

Darüber, wer Juschtschenko vergiftete, gibt es bis heute keine gesicherte Erkenntnis. Die Wiener Ärzte gingen im Dezember 2004 von einer Einnahme über den Mund aus und sprachen von „Verdacht durch Fremdverschulden“.[2] Darauf nahm die ukrainische Generalstaatsanwaltschaft Ermittlungen wegen „angeblichen Vergiftungsversuchs“ auf. Juschtschenko selbst hatte von Anfang an den Verdacht geäußert, er sei von den ukrainischen Behörden vergiftet worden, um ihn politisch auszuschalten.[6] In einem Interview mit dem Nachrichtenmagazin Der Spiegel im September 2009 beschuldigte Juschtschenko Moskau, die Verdächtigen – Sazjuk, jemanden von der Bedienung und einen Koch – zu schützen und somit in das Verbrechen verwickelt zu sein.[

Wir sind überzeugt, dass die STASI-Täter und Ihre “Partner” bald ihrer gerechten Strafe entgegensehen.

Herzlichst Ihr

Bernd Pulch, Magister Artium,

CONFIDENTIAL – THE WORLD IN 2050 – A STUDY BY PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS

world2050carbon

WEITERE BEWEISE ZU DEN DUMMDREISTEN LUEGEN DER STASI-“GoMoPa”-BEISPIEL MERIDIAN CAPITAL

Originaltexte (SIEHE AUCH ANLAGE ANBEI)

FINANZNACHRICHTEn meridian gomopa

Millionen Finanzierungen mit Widersprüchen / Die Werbemethoden der Meridian Capital Enterprises

ORIGINAL ARTIKEL GOMOPA 2

ORIGINAL ARTIKEL GOMOPA

ZUM DOWNLOAD OBEN CLICKEN

Berlin (ots) – Die Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. bietet auf ihren Webseiten weltweite Finanzierungen an. GoMoPa hat die dort gemachten Angaben analysiert und starke Widersprüche entdeckt.

Die Unternehmensstruktur

Die Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. behauptet “ein Finanzinstitut” zu sein, “das zu einer internationalen Finanzgruppe gehört.” Diese Gruppe setze sich aus 11 verschiedenen Mitgliedern zusammen. GoMoPa fragte alle zuständigen Handelsregister ab. Ergebnis: 5 der 11 angegebenen Finanzinstitute sind nicht eingetragen.

Mitarbeiter der KLP Group Emirates, GoMoPa-Partner und Management-Gruppe in Dubai, machten sich die Mühe, drei weitere Geschäftsadressen der Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. zu überprüfen. Martin Kraeter, Prinzipal der KLP Group: “Alle 3 genannten Firmen existieren hier nicht, auch nicht in abgewandelter Form.”

Das Unternehmen will weltweit über zahlreiche Standorte verfügen. Bei denen handelt es sich allerdings lediglich um “Virtual Offices” eines Büroservice-Anbieters.

Laut Firmenhomepage hat das Unternehmen seinen “rechtlichen Geschäftssitz” in Dubai. In einem GoMoPa vorliegenden Schreiben der Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. heißt es jedoch, der Firmensitz sei in London. Auf der Homepage selbst tauchen zwei Londoner Adressen auf, die das Unternehmen als “Kundenabteilung für deutschsprachige Kunden” und “Abteilung der Zusammenarbeit mit Investoren” bezeichnet.

Die Meridian Capital Enterprises ist tatsächlich als “Limited” (Ltd.) mit Sitz in England und Wales eingetragen. Eine Abfrage beim Gewerbeamt Dubais (DED) zur Firmierung jedoch bleibt ergebnislos. Bemerkenswert ist auch der vermeintliche Sitz in Israel. Auf der Webseite von Meridian Capital Enterprises heißt es: “Die Firma Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. ist im Register des israelischen Justizministeriums unter der Nummer 514108471 (…) angemeldet.” Martin Kraeter hierzu: ” Ein ‘britisch-arabisch-israelisches bankfremdes Finanzinstitut sein zu wollen, wie die Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. es darstellt, ist mehr als zweifelhaft. Es würde keinem einzigen Emirati, geschweige denn einem ‘Scheich’, auch nur im Traum einfallen Geschäfte mit Personen oder Firmen aus Israel zu machen. ”

Eigenartig ist auch: Zwei angebliche Großinvestitionen der Meridian Capital Enterprises in Dubai sind Investmentruinen bzw. erst gar nicht realisierte Projekte.

Der Aktivitätsstatus der Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. ist laut englischem Handelsregister als “dormant” gemeldet. Auf der Grundlage des britischen Gesellschaftsrechts können sich eingetragene Unternehmen selbst “dormant” (schlafend) melden, wenn sie keine oder nur unwesentliche buchhalterisch zu erfassende Transaktionen vorgenommen haben. Angesichts der angeblichen globalen Investitionstätigkeit der Meridian Capital Ltd. ist dieses jedoch sehr erstaunlich.

Auf ihrer Webseite gibt die Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. einen Überblick über ihre größten Investitionen in Deutschland: “Dithmarschen Wind Powerplant, Waldpolenz Solar Park, AIDAdiva, Berlin Hauptbahnhof, Sony Center”. Die Eigentümer des Sony Centers am Potsdamer Platz teilten GoMoPA mit, dass ihnen sei ein solcher Investor unbekannt sei. Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. will übrigens angeblich auch in die Erweiterung des Panama-Kanals sowie in das Olympiastadion in Peking investiert haben.

Der Webauftritt

Die Internetseite der MCE ist aufwendig gestaltet. Bei näherer Betrachtung fällt jedoch auf, dass es sich bei zahlreichen Fotos der Veranstaltungen der Meridian Capital Enterprises in den meisten Fällen um Bildmaterial von Online-Zeitungen oder frei zugänglichen Medienfotos einzelner Institutionen handelt.

Auf der Homepage befinden sich Videofilme, die eine verblüffende Ähnlichkeit mit dem Werbematerial von NAKHEEL aufweisen, dem größten Bauträger der Vereinigten Arabischen Emirate. Den schillernden Videos über die berühmten drei Dubai Palmen wurden offensichtlich selbstproduzierte Trailersequenzen der Meridian Capital Enterprises vorangestellt.

Ab einem Volumen von 10 Millionen Euro oder höher präsentiert sich so die Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. als der passende Investitionspartner. Auf der Internetseite sind diverse Fotos mit Scheichs an Konferenztischen zu sehen. Doch diese großen Tagungen und großen Kongresse der Meridian Capital Enterprises werden in den Pressearchiven der lokalen Presse Dubais mit keinem Wort erwähnt.

Vertiefende Information unter:

http://www.presseportal.de/go2/mehr_zu_MCE_ltd

Originaltext: GoMoPa GmbH Digitale Pressemappe: http://www.presseportal.de/pm/72697 Pressemappe via RSS : http://www.presseportal.de/rss/pm_72697.rss2

Pressekontakt: Herr Friedrich Wasserburg Telefon: +49 (30) 51060992 Fax: +49 (30) 51060994 Zuständigkeitsbereich: Presse

Firmeninfo Goldman Morgenstern & Partners LLC 575 Madison Avenue USA-10022 – 2511 New York http://www.gomopa.net

Über Goldman Morgenstern & Partners LLC: Ein Zusammenschluss aus Unternehmens-, Steuer-, Anlageberatern und Rechtsanwälten.
© 2008 news aktuell

DANN GING DIe ERPRESSUNG LOS UND MERIDIAN CAPITAL REAGIERTE – STATT DIES ABER ZUZUGEBEN SETZEN DIE STASI-VERBRECHER EINE GEFÄLSCHTE PRESSE-MITTEILUNG IN NETZ, DIE MICH BELASTEN SOLL

BITTE KONTAKTIEREN SIE AUCH MERIDIAN CAPITAL

sales@meridiancapital.com

1 Battery Park Plaza
New York, NY 10004
TEL: 212-972-3600
FAX: 212-612-0100

SECRET: FRENCH BELIEVE THAT ASSASSINATION OF SYRIAN GENERAL WAS AN INSIDE JOB

VZCZCXYZ0000
PP RUEHWEB

DE RUEHFR #1717 2561757
ZNY SSSSS ZZH
P 121757Z SEP 08
FM AMEMBASSY PARIS
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 4295
INFO RUEHXK/ARAB ISRAELI COLLECTIVE
S E C R E T PARIS 001717 

NOFORN 

SIPDIS 

E.O. 12958: DECL: 09/05/2018
TAGS: PGOV PREL PINS PINR FR SY LE
SUBJECT: FRENCH BELIEVE THAT ASSASSINATION OF SYRIAN
GENERAL SLEIMAN WAS AN INSIDE JOB 

REF: PARIS 1703 

Classified By: Political Minister Counselor Kathy Allegrone
for reasons 1.4. (b), (d). 

1.  (S/NF)  As Washington readers and others ponder French
policy toward Syria, and as an expansion of para 3 in reftel,
we pass along the previously unreported views of two of our
GOF interlocutors from meetings in late August on the
mysterious assassination earlier in the month of Syrian
brigadier general Muhammad Sleiman and its potential
significance for the regime of Syrian President Asad.  NEA
adviser at the French presidency Boris Boillon, on August 20,
asserted that the killing seemed to be some sort of inside
job.  He flatly rejected the notion that the Israelis had
taken out Sleiman, particularly the theory that a sniper had
shot him on a boat situated somewhere off the coast of the
Syrian coastal city of Tartus.  Boillon claimed that French
information was that the hit was more "classic" and
"mafia-like" with police stopping traffic in the immediate
vicinity, bodyguards looking the other way, and the assailant
pumping a slug into Sleiman's head. 

2.  (S/NF)  When asked how he interpreted the killing,
Boillon said that several theories presented themselves, the
only common denominator of which was internecine rivalry in
the entourage close to Bashar al-Asad.  Although Bashar's
disgruntled brother-in-law and sidelined head of Syrian
Military Intelligence 'Asif Shawkat seems to have the most
compelling motive for knocking off someone he might have
regarded as a rival and source of his reputed downfall in
recent months, Boillon thought Bashar's brother Mahir was a
more likely suspect.  Boillon described Mahir as ambitious, a
bit of a wild man, and determined to increase his power and
influence within the inner circle.  Inasmuch as Mahir might
have contrived to bring down Shawkat, he might also have
decided to take out his next key rival, Sleiman, in a more
permanent way. 

3.  (S/NF)  Boillon further referred  the related possibility
that Mahir had rubbed out Sleiman in the same way he might
have rubbed out Hizballah leader 'Imad Mughniyah ) possibly
even on Bashar's orders.  The latter explanation would tie in
with the notion of cleaning house as Syria needed to present
a more respectable image while it pursued its rapprochement
with France and/or needed to remove those who "knew too much"
(in the case of Sleiman, about the clandestine nuclear
program).  Of course, Boillon added, one could never rule out
the notion that Sleiman's death was related to a bloody
struggle over control of lucrative criminal activities. 

4.  (S/NF)  Pouille on August 28, meanwhile, was less
forthcoming than Boillon in terms of offering interpretations
of Sleiman's death, but he was equally categorical in
disputing the theory that the Israelis were responsible.  He
cited the French ambassador in Damascus as his source for the
contention that the killing was an inside job to "settle old
scores" as well as conveniently get rid of someone who might
have information of value to the UNIIIC on Lebanon or to the
IAEA on Syria's nuclear program. 

5.  (S/NF)  Comment:  We offer these insights, some of which
have appeared in abridged form in the French press, less for
the light they may shed on Sleiman's assassination than they
do about the French perception of the Asad regime.  Indeed,
Boillon's rundown of the various theories sounded like he had
recently read a finished French intelligence assessment of
the situation.  Both Boillon and Pouille sought, in these
conversations, to stress that France does not judge the Asad
regime dangerously unstable or Asad's grip on power slipping.
 Nonetheless, they believe that the internal situation is
fragile enough to warrant concern and a nuanced approach.  We
believe this could partly account for Sarkozy's decision to
move so quickly to cultivate his personal relationship with
Bashar and to "gamble" (as the French media have put it) on
Bashar's willingness to change course on Lebanon, peace with
Israel, and even Syria's relationship with Iran.  For what it
may be worth, former Lebanese military intelligence chief
Johnny Abdo recently contended the assassination was an
inside job and pointed to the absence of the sort of mass
arrests inside Syria that would normally accompany this type
of killing by criminal or non-regime elements.  End comment 

Please visit Paris' Classified Website at:
http://www.intelink.sgov.gov/wiki/Portal:Fran ce 

STAPLETON

SECRET: PREMATURE RUMORS OF ASIF SHAWKAT’S DEMISE

VZCZCXRO7077
PP RUEHAG RUEHROV
DE RUEHDM #0251/01 1051417
ZNY SSSSS ZZH
P 141417Z APR 08
FM AMEMBASSY DAMASCUS
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 4849
INFO RUEHXK/ARAB ISRAELI COLLECTIVE PRIORITY
RUCNMEM/EU MEMBER STATES COLLECTIVE PRIORITY
RUEHAK/AMEMBASSY ANKARA PRIORITY 5535
RUEHGB/AMEMBASSY BAGHDAD PRIORITY 0846
RUEKJCS/CJCS WASHDC PRIORITY
RUCNDT/USMISSION USUN NEW YORK PRIORITY 0378
RUEAIIA/CIA WASHDC PRIORITY
RHEFDIA/DIA WASHDC PRIORITY
RHEHNSC/NSC WASHDC PRIORITY
RHMFISS/HQ USEUCOM VAIHINGEN GE PRIORITY
RHMFISS/HQ USCENTCOM MACDILL AFB FL PRIORITY
RHEHAAA/WHITE HOUSE WASHDC PRIORITY
S E C R E T SECTION 01 OF 03 DAMASCUS 000251 

SIPDIS 

SIPDIS 

PARIS FOR JORDAN; LONDON FOR TSOU 

E.O. 12958: DECL: 04/13/2018
TAGS: PREL PGOV SY IZ
SUBJECT: PREMATURE RUMORS OF ASIF SHAWKAT'S DEMISE 

REF: DAMASCUS 142 

Classified By: CDA Michael Corbin, per 1.4 b,d. 

1.  (S) Summary:  Widespread reports that Syrian Military
Intelligence Chief Asif Shawkat is under house arrest and
that Shawkat's wife (and Bashar Asad's sister) Bushra al-Asad
is trying to flee the country likely reflect Bashar's
successful moves to limit Shawkat's influence.  While our
sources suspect both stories are untrue and blame the
external opposition for stirring the rumor mill to weaken
Bashar, Shawkat's star definitely appears to be on the wane.
End Summary 

-------------------------------
The Rumor Mill Working Overtime
------------------------------- 

2.  (SBU)  Many Embassy contacts point to a report published
by opposition website "Free Syria"  as the original source of
a number of news stories reporting Shawkat's house arrest.
Sources here also contend that former Syrian VP (and now
leader of the expat opposition group National Salvation
Front) Abdel Halim Khaddam has attempted to weaken Bashar by
repeating this rumor during recent anti-SARG interviews on
SkyTV and Lebanese TV station al Moustaqbal in which he
alleged Shawkat's house arrest and predicted Shawkat would
suffer the same fate as now deceased head of Syrian
intelligence operations in Lebanon, Ghazi Kanaan. 

3.  (SBU)  Opposition website "al Haqiqa" published an April
6 story reporting that President Asad would replace Shawkat
with SMI deputy Ali Yunis, a story similar to a "Debka"
website report on Bashar's decision to fire Shawkat.  Saudi
daily "Sharq al Awsaat" reported Shawkat's house arrest;
according to this version, Shawkat overstepped his authority
in negotiating (via the Turks) with the USG about withdrawing
Syria's support for Hizballah in exchange for agreement that
the International Tribunal would not indict senior Syrian
officials.  Another version reported by the French-based
opposition website "Ihraar Suriya" (the Free People of Syria)
alleged that Shawkat had been implicated in the assassination
plot against Hizballah leader Imad Mugniyah and that
Hizballah and Iran were demanding his prosecution. 

4.  (C) Another rumor circulating in diplomatic circles
(perhaps reflecting wishful thinking) is that Bashar has
decided to turn Shawkat over to the International Tribunal
for the murder for former Lebanese PM Rafiq Hariri in
exchange for immunity. 

-----------------------------------
Bushra al-Asad to Flee the Country?
----------------------------------- 

5.  (C)  Different stories regarding Shawkat's arrest also
allege that his wife (and Bashar older sister) has or is
attempting to leave the country and seek political asylum in
possibly France or a Gulf country such as the UAE.  The
Kuwaiti daily "al-Siyasiya," for example,  reported that
Shawkat allegedly told his wife, Busra, to leave Syria with
the couple's children, and she had applied for asylum in
France (later denied by the French government, according to
an April 13 story in "al Hayat.")  According to a few
contacts here, however, Bushra remains in Syria and her
children are still attending school.  A French Embassy
contact told us that Bushra had been to Paris earlier in the
year on a routine shopping excursion but there was no truth
to stories that she had sought political asylum. 

----------------------
Rumors Discounted Here
---------------------- 

6.  (SBU)  In what many are viewing as a SARG response to the
growing wave of rumors, an April 10 Syrian TV evening
newscast showed footage of Shawkat attending a military
academy graduation ceremony. The footage highlighted Shawkat
wearing his military uniform and appearing with Minister of
Defense Hasan Turkumani, who delivered the key note address.
Meanwhile, pro-government Syrian website "Shafaf al-Sham" ran
a story describing Shawkat as the "most powerful man in
Syria" and reporting government plans to appoint Shawkat as
Vice President for National Security Affairs.  (Note:  This
position was a job briefly held by Bashar's paternal uncle
Rifa't al-Asad before being exiled by the late Hafez al
Asad.) 

7.  (S)  Most of our contacts heavily discount reports of
Shawkat's dismissal and house arrest.  Well connected
As-Safir correspondent Ziad Haydar called the reports
"rubbish."   Ihsan Sanker, a longtime Embassy contact who
claims occassional access to Asad family members, reported
April 10 seeing Shawkat at the funeral of a mutual friend a
week earlier.  According to Sanker, mutual acquaintances say
they have seen Shawkat "regularly" over the last month. 

-----------------------------
Shawkat's Star on the Decline?
----------------------------- 

8.  (S) Describing Shawkat as "dejected and withdrawn,"
Sanker said Shawkat was "not even trying to hide" his
unhappiness over his continuing loss of influence.  The
assassination of Hizballah luminary Imad Mugniyeh led to a
series of accusations between SMI and GID, with the outcome
coming out in GID's favor, Sanker reported.  Additionally,
Sanker said he had heard Shawkat's portfolio had been pared
down to military issues, while Bashar's cousin Hafez Makhluf
had all but taken over the national security portfolio.
As-Safir correspondent Haydar reported he had heard the same
thing, saying Bashar had recently further marginalized
Shawkat's national security role. 

9.  (S)  Orient Center Director and MFA Advisor Samir al-Taki
told us recently that Shawkat and  GID chief Ali Mamluk had
exchanged mutual recriminations of blame and negligence in
the wake of the Mugniyeh assassination (reftel).  In an
attempt to discredit GID, Shawkat ordered SMI to question a
number of Syrians with ties to France and the U.S. (including
al-Taki) under possible suspicion of involvement in the
Mugniyeh affair.  In the meantime, al-Taqi added, the GID had
assumed primary responsibility for investigating the Mugniyeh
killing, under the overall direction of Bashar's cousin,
Hafez Makhluf, a prominent GID officer.  Against the backdrop
of these recent events, an ongoing reorganization of security
organizations has made it difficult to determine who was up
and who was down, al-Taqi explained.  Separate reporting and
diplomatic circles point to Mamluk's rise and Shawkat's
relative retreat. But Al-Taqi cast doubt on reports of
Shawkat's removal, saying "we've heard such reports before,"
only to see Shawkat maintain his position as a key insider. 

-------------------------
Shawkat in the Dog House?
------------------------- 

10.  (S)  A UK-Syrian business contact with low level regime
ties told us April 13 that Shawkat's problems with Bashar had
come to head before the Arab League Summit.  According to
this source, SMI arrested a Saudi national suspected of
involvement in the Mugniyeh assassination.  This Saudi died
in SMI custody, complicating Bashar's already strained
relations with the Saudi royal family.  A variant of this
rumor which has appeared in the press was that the deceased
Saudi was a diplomat working in the Saudi Embassy.  Our
contact discounted this rumor because "not even Shawkat would
be stupid enough" to apprehend someone with diplomatic
immunity. 

11.  (S)  Comment:  It seems highly unlikely that Bashar
would arrest Shawkat unless he perceived a direct challenge
to his authority, especially at a time when Syrians are
openly talking about the possibility of war with Israel and
worsening economic conditions that require greater regime
cohesion.  Moreover, we strongly doubt Bashar feels pressured
enough on Lebanon to be preparing to turn over Shawkat to the
Tribunal.  Rather, we believe Bashar's continuing efforts to
erode Shawkat's influence reflect his perception of Shawkat
as a potential threat that must be managed.  Separately, we
assess that Bashar is most comfortable with Bushra here in
Syria under his thumb and that he would not cause her to
flee.  We also believe that unless family matters worsen,
Bushra prefers to reside in Syria, particularly given her
desire to stay close to her elderly mother. 

CORBIN

SECRET: HIZBALLAH’S IMAD MUGNIYAH KILLED BY CAR BOMB

VZCZCXRO7049
PP RUEHAG RUEHROV
DE RUEHDM #0107 0441447
ZNY SSSSS ZZH
P 131447Z FEB 08
FM AMEMBASSY DAMASCUS
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 4627
INFO RUEHXK/ARAB ISRAELI COLLECTIVE PRIORITY
RUCNMEM/EU MEMBER STATES COLLECTIVE PRIORITY
RUEAIIA/CIA WASHDC PRIORITY
RUEPGBA/CDR USEUCOM INTEL VAIHINGEN GE PRIORITY
RHEFDIA/DIA WASHDC PRIORITY
RHMFISS/HQ USCENTCOM MACDILL AFB FL PRIORITY
RHEHNSC/NSC WASHDC PRIORITY
RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHDC PRIORITY
S E C R E T DAMASCUS 000107 

SIPDIS 

SIPDIS 

E.O. 12958: DECL: 02/12/2018
TAGS: PGOV PTER SY LE
SUBJECT: HIZBALLAH'S IMAD MUGNIYAH KILLED BY CAR BOMB IN
DAMASCUS 

Classified By: CDA Michael Corbin, reasons 1.5 b and d. 

1.  (SBU)  Syria's tightly controlled press remained silent
on reports of Imad Mugniyah's death in a car bomb that
exploded near Syrian Military Intelligence (SMI) headquarters
in the neighborhood of Kafr Sousa at approximately 10:00 pm
local February 12.  According to contacts who were on the
scene, SMI secured and cleared the area and kept other police
services away.  Tow trucks removed several vehicles within 45
minutes after the explosion which jarred surrounding
buildings and could be felt at the American Ambassador's
residence three miles away.  Syrian officials reported the
blast had been the result of a butane gas leak and that one
unidentified person (later two) had been killed. 

2.  (C) Media and other contacts reported mid-morning
February 13 that unknown assailants had launched a car bomb
attack against notorious Hizballah military operative Imad
Mugniyah.  The story broke simultaneously on wire services
and Arab satellite television stations al Jazeera, al
Arabyia, and al Manar.  Western press was also reporting that
the second victim was Hizballah MP al Hajj Hussein, although
Hizballah denied this.  As of COB local, Syrian authorities
had yet to provide any further comment on the incident.  (A
Fox News affiliate told us MFA officials seemed "shocked" by
reports of Mugniyah's death but offered no comment.) 

3.  (C)  The most frequent theory suggested by media and
diplomatic contacts was that Israel conducted the attack to
embarrass Syria on the eve of a previously scheduled visit by
Iranian FM Manuchehr Mottaki.  Going to the other extreme,
others were unwilling to rule out that Hizballah itself had
conducted the assassination to neutralize Mugniyah's
challenge to Hizballah Secretary General Hassan Nasrallah.
One contact even suggested that Syria could have undertaken
the operation as a sign of its desire to engage Israel and
the West. 

4.  (S)  Saudi XXXXXXXXXXXX (protect)
told us Mugniyah's presence in Damascus might have been
related to a possible February 13 meeting in Damascus among
Lebanese March 8 MPs with SARG officials.  He also noted that
SMI Director Assaf Shawkat's offices were close to where the
explosion occurred, and Mugniyah could have been going to or
coming from the meeting.  British and Egyptian Embassy
sources suggested Iranian FM Mottaki planned to meet with
Hizballah and March 8 representatives during his February
13-14 visit to Damascus as a counter to March 14's planned
public demonstration to mark the third anniversary of the
February 14 assassination of former Lebanese PM Rafiq Hariri. 

5.  (C)  Comment: This apparent targeted assassination of one
of Hizballah's most notorious operatives coincides with a
busy week of official visits meant to refute suggestions that
Syria's Lebanon policy is resulting in a new period of
Western and Arab diplomatic isolation.  Syria's ongoing
silence regarding the attack is a characteristic regime
response, most recently observed (and still in effect) after
Israel's September 6 air strike near Deir az-Zur.  This
silence likely reflects a deep sense of regime embarrassment
from the acknowledged assassination of a wanted-terrorist
whose presence in Syria it denied for years.  The event also
impacts Syrian-Iranian-Hizballah cooperation on the eve of FM
Mottaki's visit likely meant to bolster Syria's position in
the face of escalating March 14 rhetoric and growing Western
impatience with Syria's Lebanon policy.
CORBIN

Der Beweis: Erpressungsversuch des „NACHRICHTENDIENSTES“ GoMoPa“ an Meridian Capital

Der Beweis: Erpressungsversuch des „NACHRICHTENDIENSTES“ GoMoPa“ an Meridian Capital (DAS INVESTMENT MAGAZIN – DAS ORIGINAL – IMMOBILIEN VERTRAULICH) DAS ORIGINAL) – Nachfolgend bringen wir eine Original-Pressemeldung von „GoMoPa“, dem „NACHRICHTENDIENST“ mit dem Meridian Capital, London, erpresst werden sollte.Der Artikel strotzt nur von Fehlern. Damit ist deutlich, dass „GoMoPa“ tatsäch Meridian Capital erpresst hat und die Aktionen von Meridian Capital sich gegen „GoMoPa“ gerichtet haben.
Die gefälschte Pressemitteilung von Meridian Capital in Bezug auf unser Haus soll von dem „NACHRICHTENDIENST“ „GoMoPa“ ablenken.

„GoMopa“ schreibt:

08.09.2008
Weltweite Finanzierungen mit Widersprüchen

Die Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. gibt an, weltweite Finanzierungen anbieten zu können und präsentiert sich hierbei auf aufwendig kreierten Webseiten. GOMOPA hat die dort gemachten Angaben analysiert und Widersprüche entdeckt.

Der Firmensitz

Der Firmensitz befindet sich laut eigener Aussage in Dubai, Vereinigte Arabische Emirate. In einem GOMOPA vorliegenden Schreiben der Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. heißt es jedoch, der Firmensitz sei in London. Auf der Homepage des Unternehmens taucht die Geschäftsadresse in der Londoner Old Broad Street nur als „Kundenabteilung für deutschsprachige Kunden“ auf. Eine weitere Adresse in der englischen Hauptstadt, diesmal in der Windsor Avenue, sei die „Abteilung der Zusammenarbeit mit Investoren“.

Die Meridian Capital Enterprises ist tatsächlich als „Limited“ (Ltd.) mit Sitz in England und Wales eingetragen. Aber laut Firmenhomepage hat das Unternehmen seinen „rechtlichen Geschäftssitz“ in Dubai. Eine Abfrage beim Gewerbeamt Dubais (DED) zu dieser Firmierung bleibt ergebnislos.

Bemerkenswert ist auch der vermeintliche Sitz in Israel. Auf der Webseite von Meridian Capital Enterprises heißt es: „Die Firma Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. ist im Register des israelischen Justizministeriums unter der Nummer 514108471, gemäß dem Gesellschaftsrecht von 1999, angemeldet.“ Hierzu Martin Kraeter, Gomopa-Partner und Prinzipal der KLP Group Emirates in Dubai: „Es würde keinem einzigen Emirati – geschweige denn einem Scheich auch nur im Traum einfallen, direkte Geschäfte mit Personen oder Firmen aus Israel zu tätigen. Und schon gar nicht würde er zustimmen, dass sein Konterfei auch noch mit vollem Namen auf der Webseite eines Israelischen Unternehmens prangt.“

Auf der Internetseite sind diverse Fotos mit Scheichs an Konferenztischen zu sehen. Doch diese großen Tagungen und großen Kongresse der Meridian Capital Enterprises werden in den Pressearchiven der lokalen Presse Dubais mit keinem Wort erwähnt.
Martin Kraeter: „ Ein ‚britisch-arabisch-israelisches bankfremdes Finanzinstitut sein zu wollen, wie die Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. es darstellt, ist mehr als zweifelhaft. So etwas gibt es schlicht und ergreifend nicht! Der Nahostkonflikt schwelt schon seit mehr als 50 Jahren. Hier in den Vereinigten Arabischen Emiraten (VAE) werden Israelis erst gar nicht ins Land gelassen. Israelische Produkte sind gebannt. Es gibt nicht einmal direkte Telefonverbindungen. Die VAE haben fast 70% der Wiederaufbaukosten des Libanon geschultert, nachdem Israel dort einmarschiert ist.“

Zwei angebliche Großinvestitionen der Meridian Capital Enterprises in Dubai sind Investmentruinen bzw. erst gar nicht realisierte Projekte. Das Unternehmen wirbt mit ihrer finanziellen Beteiligung an dem Dubai Hydropolis Hotel und dem Dubai Snowdome.

Der Aktivitätsstatus der Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. ist laut englischen Handelsregister (UK Companies House) „dormant“ gemeldet. Auf der Grundlage des englischen Gesellschaftsrechts können sich eingetragene Unternehmen selbst „dormant“ (schlafend) melden, wenn sie keine oder nur unwesentliche buchhalterisch zu erfassende Transaktionen vorgenommen haben. Dies ist angesichts der angeblichen globalen Investitionstätigkeit der Meridian Capital Ltd. sehr erstaunlich.

Der Webauftritt

Die Internetseite der MCE ist sehr aufwendig gestaltet, die Investitionen angeblich in Millionen- und Milliardenhöhe. Bei näherer Betrachtung der Präsentationselemente fällt jedoch auf, dass es sich bei zahlreichen veröffentlichen Fotos, die Veranstaltungen der Meridian Capital Enterprises dokumentieren sollen, meist um Fotos von Online-Zeitungen oder frei zugänglichen Medienfotos einzelner Institutionen handelt wie z.B. der Börse Dubai.

Auf der Internetpräsenz befinden sich Videofilmchen, die eine frappierende Ähnlichkeit mit dem Werbematerial von NAKHEEL aufweisen, dem größten Bauträger der Vereinigten Arabischen Emirate. Doch den schillernden Videos über die berühmten drei Dubai Palmen „Jumeirah, Jebel Ali und Deira“ oder das Archipel „The World“ wurden offensichtlich selbstproduzierte Trailersequenzen der Meridian Capital Enterprises vorangestellt. Doch könnte es sich bei den Werbevideos um Fremdmaterial handeln.

Auch die auf der Webseite wahllos platzierten Fotos von bekannten Sehenswürdigkeiten Dubais fungieren als Augenfang für den interessierten Surfer mit eigenem Finanzierungswunsch. Bei einem Volumen von 10 Millionen Euro oder höher präsentiert sich die Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. als der passende Investitionspartner. Das Unternehmen verfügt weltweit über zahlreiche Standorte: Berlin, London, Barcelona, Warschau, Moskau, Dubai, Riad, Tel Aviv, Hong Kong und New York. Aber nahezu alle Standorte sind lediglich Virtual Offices eines global arbeitenden Büroservice-Anbieters. „Virtual Office“ heißt im Deutschen schlicht „Briefkastenfirma“. Unter solchen Büroadressen sollen laut Meridian Capital Enterprises ganze Kommissionen ansässig sein, alles zum Wohle des Kunden.“

Zitatende

Dies ist das altbekannte Muster des „NACHRCHTENDIENSTES“ „GoMoPa“ und seiner Berliner und Hamburger Komplizen Falschmeldungen zu verbreiten, um Firmen und Personen erpressen oder ausschalten zu können.

Meridian Capital about GoMoPa

Skip navigation

Sehr geehrte Damen und Herren,

die Betrüger und durch uns inhaftierten Erpresser der GoMoPa versuchen mit einer gefälschten Presse-Mitteilung von usich abzulenken und einen investigativen Journalisten, Bernd Pulch, zu belasten.

Die Presse-Mitteilung auf pressreleaser.org ist eine Fälschung und die gesamte webseite ist der GoMoPa zu zuordnen.

Hier noch einmal die tatäschlichen Geschehnisse:

Hier der Artikel von “GoMoPa” über Meridian Capital.


Der Beweis: Erpressungsversuch des „NACHRICHTENDIENSTES“ GoMoPa“ an Meridian Capital „GoMopa“ schreibt:08.09.2008
Weltweite Finanzierungen mit WidersprüchenDie Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. gibt an, weltweite Finanzierungen anbieten zu können und präsentiert sich hierbei auf aufwendig kreierten Webseiten. GOMOPA hat die dort gemachten Angaben analysiert und Widersprüche entdeckt.Der Firmensitz

Der Firmensitz befindet sich laut eigener Aussage in Dubai, Vereinigte Arabische Emirate. In einem GOMOPA vorliegenden Schreiben der Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. heißt es jedoch, der Firmensitz sei in London. Auf der Homepage des Unternehmens taucht die Geschäftsadresse in der Londoner Old Broad Street nur als „Kundenabteilung für deutschsprachige Kunden“ auf. Eine weitere Adresse in der englischen Hauptstadt, diesmal in der Windsor Avenue, sei die „Abteilung der Zusammenarbeit mit Investoren“.

Die Meridian Capital Enterprises ist tatsächlich als „Limited“ (Ltd.) mit Sitz in England und Wales eingetragen. Aber laut Firmenhomepage hat das Unternehmen seinen „rechtlichen Geschäftssitz“ in Dubai. Eine Abfrage beim Gewerbeamt Dubais (DED) zu dieser Firmierung bleibt ergebnislos.

Bemerkenswert ist auch der vermeintliche Sitz in Israel. Auf der Webseite von Meridian Capital Enterprises heißt es: „Die Firma Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. ist im Register des israelischen Justizministeriums unter der Nummer 514108471, gemäß dem Gesellschaftsrecht von 1999, angemeldet.“ Hierzu Martin Kraeter, Gomopa-Partner und Prinzipal der KLP Group Emirates in Dubai: „Es würde keinem einzigen Emirati – geschweige denn einem Scheich auch nur im Traum einfallen, direkte Geschäfte mit Personen oder Firmen aus Israel zu tätigen. Und schon gar nicht würde er zustimmen, dass sein Konterfei auch noch mit vollem Namen auf der Webseite eines Israelischen Unternehmens prangt.“

Auf der Internetseite sind diverse Fotos mit Scheichs an Konferenztischen zu sehen. Doch diese großen Tagungen und großen Kongresse der Meridian Capital Enterprises werden in den Pressearchiven der lokalen Presse Dubais mit keinem Wort erwähnt.
Martin Kraeter: „ Ein ‚britisch-arabisch-israelisches bankfremdes Finanzinstitut sein zu wollen, wie die Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. es darstellt, ist mehr als zweifelhaft. So etwas gibt es schlicht und ergreifend nicht! Der Nahostkonflikt schwelt schon seit mehr als 50 Jahren. Hier in den Vereinigten Arabischen Emiraten (VAE) werden Israelis erst gar nicht ins Land gelassen. Israelische Produkte sind gebannt. Es gibt nicht einmal direkte Telefonverbindungen. Die VAE haben fast 70% der Wiederaufbaukosten des Libanon geschultert, nachdem Israel dort einmarschiert ist.“

Zwei angebliche Großinvestitionen der Meridian Capital Enterprises in Dubai sind Investmentruinen bzw. erst gar nicht realisierte Projekte. Das Unternehmen wirbt mit ihrer finanziellen Beteiligung an dem Dubai Hydropolis Hotel und dem Dubai Snowdome.

Der Aktivitätsstatus der Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. ist laut englischen Handelsregister (UK Companies House) „dormant“ gemeldet. Auf der Grundlage des englischen Gesellschaftsrechts können sich eingetragene Unternehmen selbst „dormant“ (schlafend) melden, wenn sie keine oder nur unwesentliche buchhalterisch zu erfassende Transaktionen vorgenommen haben. Dies ist angesichts der angeblichen globalen Investitionstätigkeit der Meridian Capital Ltd. sehr erstaunlich.

Der Webauftritt

Die Internetseite der MCE ist sehr aufwendig gestaltet, die Investitionen angeblich in Millionen- und Milliardenhöhe. Bei näherer Betrachtung der Präsentationselemente fällt jedoch auf, dass es sich bei zahlreichen veröffentlichen Fotos, die Veranstaltungen der Meridian Capital Enterprises dokumentieren sollen, meist um Fotos von Online-Zeitungen oder frei zugänglichen Medienfotos einzelner Institutionen handelt wie z.B. der Börse Dubai.

Auf der Internetpräsenz befinden sich Videofilmchen, die eine frappierende Ähnlichkeit mit dem Werbematerial von NAKHEEL aufweisen, dem größten Bauträger der Vereinigten Arabischen Emirate. Doch den schillernden Videos über die berühmten drei Dubai Palmen „Jumeirah, Jebel Ali und Deira“ oder das Archipel „The World“ wurden offensichtlich selbstproduzierte Trailersequenzen der Meridian Capital Enterprises vorangestellt. Doch könnte es sich bei den Werbevideos um Fremdmaterial handeln.

Auch die auf der Webseite wahllos platzierten Fotos von bekannten Sehenswürdigkeiten Dubais fungieren als Augenfang für den interessierten Surfer mit eigenem Finanzierungswunsch. Bei einem Volumen von 10 Millionen Euro oder höher präsentiert sich die Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. als der passende Investitionspartner. Das Unternehmen verfügt weltweit über zahlreiche Standorte: Berlin, London, Barcelona, Warschau, Moskau, Dubai, Riad, Tel Aviv, Hong Kong und New York. Aber nahezu alle Standorte sind lediglich Virtual Offices eines global arbeitenden Büroservice-Anbieters. „Virtual Office“ heißt im Deutschen schlicht „Briefkastenfirma“. Unter solchen Büroadressen sollen laut Meridian Capital Enterprises ganze Kommissionen ansässig sein, alles zum Wohle des Kunden.“

Zitatende

Hier die Hintergründe der Erpressung:

http://www.immobilien-vertraulich.com/law/7154-opfer-nach-immovation-und-estavis-versucht-gomopa-nun-dkb-zu-erpressen-gomopa-hintermann-ra-resch.html

Hier unsere Original-Stellungnahme:

Anfang Oktober 2008 erhielt einer der Arbeiter der Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. eine Meldung von einem anonymen Sender, dass in naher Zukunft – zuerst im Internet, dann im Fernsehen, im Radio und in der deutschen Presse – Informationen erscheinen, die die Funktionsweise und Tätigkeiten der Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. in einem äußerst negativen Licht darstellen. Der Mitarbeiter der Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. wurde also informiert, dass diese Meldungen/Nachrichten zweifelsohne deutlich das Aussehen und den guten Ruf der Firma Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. beeinträchtigen.
Der an dieser Stelle erwähnte „Gesprächspartner” hat den Arbeiter der Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. informiert, dass die Möglichkeit besteht die peinliche Situation zu vermeiden, indem die Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. auf das von der Person gezeigte Konto die Summe von 100.000,00 EUR überweist. Wie sich aber später zeigte, war der Herr Klaus Maurischat – dieser anonyme Gesprächspartner – „Gehirn“ und „Lider des GOMOPA“. Die Ermittlungen wurden angestellt durch die Bundeskriminalpolizei (Verfolgungs- und Ermittlungsorgan auf der Bundesebene) während des Ermittlungsverfahrens wegen einer finanziellen Erpressung, Betrügereien auch wegen der Bedrohungen, welche von Herrn Maurischat und seine Mitarbeiter praktiziert wurden sowie wegen Teilnahme anderer (Leiter der Internetservices und Moderatoren der Blogs) an diesem Prozedere. Diese Straftaten wurden begangen zu Schaden vieler Berufs- und Justizpersonen, darunter auch der Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. Die Opfer dieses Verbrechens sind in Deutschland, Österreich, der Schweiz, Spanien, Portugal, Großbritannien, den USA und Kanada sichtbar.
In diesem Moment taucht folgende Frage auf: Wie war die Reaktion der Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. auf die Forderungen seitens GOMOPA? Entsprach die Reaktion den Erwartungen von GOMOPA? Hat die Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. die geforderte Summe 100.000,00 EUR überwiesen?
Seites der Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. gab es überhaupt keine Reaktion auf den Erpressungsversuch von GOMOPA. Ende August 2008 auf dem Service http://www.gompa.net sind zahlreiche Artikel/Meldungen erscheinen, welche die Tätigkeit der Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. in einem sehr negativen Licht dargestellt haben. Nachdem die auf http://www.gomopa.net enthaltenen Informationen ausführlich und vollständig analysiert worden waren, ergab es sich, dass sie der Wahrheit nicht einmal in einem Punkt entsprechen und potenzielle und bereits bestehende Kunden der Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. in Bezug auf die von diesem Finanzinstitut geführten Geschäftstätigkeit irreführen. Infolge der kriminellen Handlugen von GOMOPA und der mit ihm kooperierenden Services und Blogs im Netz hat die Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. beachtliche und messbare geschäftliche Verluste erlitten. Die Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. hat nämlich in erster Linie eine wichtige Gruppe von potenziellen Kund verloren. Was sich aber als wichtiger ergab, haben sich die bisherigen Kunden von der Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. kaum abgewandt. Diejenigen Kunden haben unsere Dienstleitungen weiterhin genutzt und nutzen die immer noch. In Hinblick auf die bisherige Zusammenarbeit mit der Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd., werden ihrerseits dem entsprechend keine Einwände erhoben .
GOMOPA hat so einen Verlauf der Ereignisse genau prognostiziert, dessen Ziel beachtliche und messbare geschäftliche durch die Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. erlittene Verluste waren. Der Verlauf der Ereignisse hat das Service GOMOPA mit Sicherheit gefreut. GOMOPA hat nämlich darauf gerechnet, dass die Stellung der Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. nachlässt und das Finanzinstitut die geforderte Summe (100.000,00 EUR) bereitstellt. Im Laufe der Zeit, als das ganze Prozedere im Netz immer populärer war, versuchte GOMOPA noch vier mal zu der Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. Kontakte aufzunehmen, indem es jedes mal das Einstellen dieser kriminellen „Kompanie” versprochen hat, wobei es jedes mal seine finanziellen Forderungen heraufsetzte. Die letzte für das Einstellen der „Kompanie“ gegen die Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. vorgesehene Quote betrug sogar 5.000.000,00 EUR (in Worten: fünfmilionen EURO). Die Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. konnte sich aber vor den ständig erhöhenden Forderungen seitens des Services GOMOPA behaupten.
Im Oktober 2008 traf die Leitung der Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. Entscheidung über die Benachrichtigung der Internationalen Polizei INTERPOL sowie entsprechender Strafverfolgungsorgane der BRD (die Polizei und die Staatsanwaltschaft) über den bestehenden Sachverhalt. In der Zwischenzeit meldeten sich bei der Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. zahlreiche Firmen und Korporationen, sogar Berufsperson wie Ärzte, Richter, Priester, Schauspieler und anderen Personen aus unterschiedlichen Ländern der Welt, die der Erpressung von GOMOPA nachgegeben und die geforderten Geldsummen überwiesen haben. Diese Personen gaben bereits Erklärungen ab, dass sie dies getan haben, damit man sie bloß endlich „in Ruhe lässt” und um unnötige Probleme, Schwierigkeiten und einen kaum begründbaren Ausklang vermeiden zu können. Die Opfer dieses kriminellen Vorgehens haben die Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. über unterschiedliche Geldsummen, welche verlangt wurden, informiert.
In einem Fall gab es verhältnismäßig kleine (um ein paar tausend EURO), in einem anderen Fall handelte es schon um beachtliche Summen (rund um paar Millionen EURO).
Zusätzlich wendeten sich an die Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. Firmen, welche dem GOMOPA noch keine „Gebühr” überweisen haben und bereits überlegen, ob sie dies tun sollen, oder nicht. Diese Firmen erwarteten von der Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. eine klare Stellungnahme sowie eine professionelle praktische Beratung, wie man sich in solch einer Lage verhalten soll und wie man diese Geldforderungen umgehen kann. Die Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. hat ausnahmslos allen Verbrechensopfern, welche sich bei unserer Firma gemeldet haben, eine Zusammenarbeit vorgeschlagen. Als oberste Aufgabe stellt sich diese Kooperation, gemeinsam entschlossene und wirksame Maßnahmen gegen GOMOPA, gegen andere Services im Netz sowie gegen alle Bloggers zu treffen, die an dem hier beschriebenen internationalen kriminellen Vorgehen mit GOMOPA-Führung teilnehmen.Auf unsere Bitte benachrichtigten alle mitbeteiligten Firmen die Internationale Polizei INTERPOL sowie ihre heimischen Verfolgungsorgane, u. a. die zuständige Staatsanwaltschaft und die Polizeibehörden über den bestehenden Sachverhalt.
In Hinblick auf die Tatsache, dass das verbrecherische Handeln von GOMOPA sich über viele Staaten erstreckte und dass die Anzahl der in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland erstatteten Anzeigen wegen der durch GOMOPA, Internetservices und Bloggers begangenen Straftaten, rasant wuchs – was zweifelsohne von einer weit gehenden kriminellen Wirkungskraft des GOMOPA zeugt – schlug die Internationale Wirtschaftspolizei INTERPOL der Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. vor, dass sich ihr Vertreter in Berlin mit dem Vertreter von GOMOPA trifft, um die „Zahlungsmodalitäten“ und Überweisung der Summe von 5.000.000,00 EUR zu besprechen. Dieser Schritt meinte, eine gut durchdachte und durch die Bundeskriminalpolizei organisierte Falle durchzuführen, deren Ziel die Festnahme der unter GOMOPA wirkenden internationalen Straftäter war.
Die koordinierten Schritte und Maßnahmen der Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. und anderer Beschädigter, geleitet von der Internationalen Wirtschaftspolizei INTERPOL, dem Bundeskriminalamt und der Staatsanwaltschaft der Bundesrepublik Deutschland haben zur Aus-, Einarbeitung und Durchführung der oben beschriebenen Falle beigetragen. Im November 2008 führte die in Berlin vorbereitete Falle zur Festnahme und Verhaftung des Vertreters des GOMOPA, der nach der Festnahme auf Herrn Klaus Maurichat – als den Hauptverantwortlichen und Anführer der internationalen kriminellen Gruppe GOMOPA verwies. Der Festgenommene benannte und zeigte der Bundeskriminalpolizei zugleich den aktuellen Aufenthaltsort des Herrn Klaus Maurischat. „Gehirn“ und Gründer dieser internationalen kriminellen Gruppe GOMOPA, Herr Klaus Maurischat wurde am selben Tag auch festgenommen und auf Frist verhaftet, wird bald in Anklagezustand gestellt, wird die Verantwortung für eigene Straftaten und die des Forums GOMOPA vor einem zuständigen Bundesgericht tragen. Die Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. unternahm bereits alle möglichen Schritte, damit Herr Klaus Maurischat auch auf der Anklagebank des zuständigen Gerichts des Vereinigten Königsreiches Großbritannien erscheint. Unter den beschädigten Berufs- und Justizpersonen aus Großbritannien, neben der Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. gibt es noch viele Opfer von GOMOPA…

Die dreisten Verbrecher wagen es unter http://www.pressreleaser.org, einer eigenen “GoMoPa”-Seite unsere Pressemitteilung oben zu verfälschen und unschuldige Personen zu belasten.

Dear Readers,

after a thorough research we are sure that the real “GoMoPa” boss is Jochen Resch, lawyer in Berlin, Germany. He is the brain behind “GoMoPa” and responsable for blackmailing, extortion, racketeering, cybermurder and murder – in the tradition of the East German “Inteeligence” STASI that is why he called “GoMoPa” – Financial “Intelligence” Service .

Webmaster

Meridian Capital about GoMoPa

Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. unveils new criminal phenomena in network. In recently appeared on the net more often at the same time a new a very worrying phenomenon of criminal nature. Professional criminals groups in the network are taking part, to extortion, fraud, Erschwindeln relating to certain specifically selected companies and businesses are capable of. These criminals developed new methods and means, simply and in a short time to bereichern.Strategien and manifestations, which underlie this process are fairly simple. A criminal is looking to “carefully” on the Internet specific companies and corporations (victims of crime) and informed them in the next step, that of the business activities of such companies and corporations in the near future – first on the Internet then in other available mass media – numerous and very unfavorable information appears. At the same time, the criminals beat their future victims an effective means of reducing unnecessary difficulties and problems to escape the loss of good name and image of the company and corporate sector. These offenders are aware of that reputation, name and appearance of each company is a value in itself. It was therefore a value of what each company is prepared to pay any price. But the reason for difficulties and problems arising from the loss of good name and reputation result. The criminals and their victims are already aware that this loss is devastating consequences might have been the closing down of a particular business can enforce. It takes both to No as well as at large companies regard. The company is concerned that in virtually every industry in each country and cross-border activities sind.Das criminal procedure in the form of a blackmail on money, a fraud is becoming rapidly and globally, ie led cross-border and internationally. Among the victims of extortion, fraud is now looking both at home (domestic) and international corporations, the major emphasis on conservation, keeping and maintaining their reputation in the business according to their credibility lay. The criminals in the network have understood that maintaining an unassailable reputation and name of a company the unique ability to provide fast and easy enrichment forms. The above-mentioned criminal procedure is difficult to track because it is international in nature, and by overlapping or even nonexistent (fictional) professional and judicial persons in various countries and operated company wird.Diese offenders in the network publish it and disseminate false information about your victims on remote servers, which are not uncommon in many exotic countries. There are those countries in which serious gaps in the legal system, investigative and prosecution procedures are visible. As an example, at this point mention India werden. Mit criminals working in the network grid portals known leader of blogs with your seat-consciously or unconsciously, even in highly developed countries. For example, at this point, countries such as Germany, Austria, Switzerland, the United States, Britain, Spain or Portugal are mentioned. The below listed criminals were able to act unpunished today. As a symptom of such action appears here the activity and “effectiveness” of the company GOMOPA, which is on countries such as Germany, Switzerland, Austria, the United States, Britain, Spain and India. A good example of such an action is Mr. Klaus Mauri Chat – the leader and “brain” of the company GOMOPA with many already in force and criminal judgments “on his account”, which in this way for years and funded its maintenance in the industry almost unlimited activity. This status will change dramatically, however, including far and wide thanks to discontinued operations of the firm Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. who would oppose such offenses addressed in the network. Other companies and corporations, in which the crime network and outside of this medium have fallen victim to contribute to combating such crimes bei.Die situation is changing, thanks to effective steps and the successful cooperation of the firm Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. with the international police Interpol, with the federal agency (FBI) in the U.S., the Federal Criminal Police in Germany, with Scotland Yard in Britain, as well as with the Russian secret service FSB.Die Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. – Together with other companies and cooperations, the victim of criminal activities of the network of crime have fallen – has undeniably already started to yield results. The fact that in recent weeks (November 2008) on the territory of the Federal Republic of Germany of the above-mentioned leaders and “brain” of the company GOMOPA, Mr Klaus Maurishat was arrested should not be ignored. The Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. information available results clearly show that the next arrests of persons participating in this process in such countries as: Austria, Switzerland, Russia, Ukraine, Poland, Spain, Mexico, Portugal, Brazil, the USA, Canada, UK, Ireland , Australia, New Zealand and made in a.. The ultimate goal of Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. and the other victims of crime in the network is to provide all participants in this criminal procedure before the competent court to lead. All professional and judicial persons, regardless of the seat and out of the business, which the above-described criminal action (fraud, extortion) to have fallen victim can of Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. led company to join the goal set at all at this point the procedure described those associated in the public and the economic life out. II blacklist blackmail and with international fraudsters and their methods (opus operandi) in the following countries: 1 The Federal Republic Deutschland2. Dubai 3rd Russia 1st The Federal Republic of Germany GmbH GOMOPA, Goldman Morgenstern & Partners LLC., Goldman Morgenstern & Partners Consulting LLC, Wottle collection. In these firms are quite active following persons: – Klaus Mauri Chat ( “Father” and “brain” of the criminal organization responsible for countless final judgments have been achieved (arrested in Germany in November 2008) – Josef Rudolf Heckel ( “right hand “when Mr Klaus Mauri chat, denounced former banker who is excessive in many Bankschmuggeleien was involved.
The study of 900 pages named Toxdat by Ehrenfried Stelzer is the “Stasi Killer Bible”. It lists all kind of murder methods and concentrates on the most effective and untraceable.
“The toxdat study was ordered by Stasi Vice-President Gerhard Neiber, the second man in rank after boss Erich Mielke. The toxdat study was also the theoretical “story book” for the murder of the famous German watchdog and journalist Heinz Gerlach by former Stasi member under the guidance of “GoMoPa”,” an informer stated. “Ehrenfried stelzer” was nicknamed “Professor Murder” by his victims. Even close co-worker now compare him with the German SS”doctor” Mengele, “Dr. Death” from Auschwitz.
Only two articles let the German audience believe that the famous journalist and watchdog Heinz Gerlach died on natural courses by blood pollution.

For more Information the victims have launched a new site: http://www.victims-opfer.com

The first one, published only hours after the death of Mr Heinz Gerlach by the notorious “GoMoPa” (see article below) and a second 3 days later by a small German local newspaper, Weserbergland Nachrichten.
Many people including the hostile Gerlach website “Akte Heinz Gerlach” doubted that this man who had so many enemies and friends would die of natural causes without any previous warning. Rumours occured that Mr. Gerlach’s doctor doubted natural courses at all. After many critical voices discussed the issue a small website of a small German local newspaper – which never before had reported about Mr. Heinz Gerlach and which is not even in the region of Mr Gerlachs home – published that Mr Gerlach died of blood pollution. Weserbergland-Nachrichten published a long article about the deadly consequences of blood pollution and did not even name the source of such an important statement. It claimed only that somebody of Gerlachs inner circle had said this. It is a proven fact that after the collpase of the Eastern German Communist Regime many former Communist propaganda agents went to regional newspapers – often in Western Germany like Günther Schabowski did the man who opened the “Mauer”.
The theatre stage was set: One day later the hostile Gerlach website “Akte Heinz Gerlach” took the agenda publishing that Mr Gerlach had died for natural causes without any further research at all.
This was done by a website which for months and months and months reported everything about Mr. Gerlach.
Furthermore a research proves that the technical details regarding the website hosting of this hostile website “Akte Heinz Gerlach” proves that there are common details with the hosting of “GoMoPa” and their affiliates as proven by the SJB-GoMoPa-victims (see http://www.sjb-fonds-opfer.com)
Insiders believe that the murderers of Mr. Heinz Gerlach are former members of the Eastern German Terror Organisation “Stasi” with dioxins. They also believe that “GoMoPa” was part of the plot. At “GoMoPa”’ a person named Siegfried Siewers was officialy responsible for the press but never appeared in public. “GoMoPa”-victims say that this name was a cameo for “GoMoPa” frontrunner Klaus Maurischat who is controlled by the Stasi Top Agent Ehrenfried Stelzner, Berlin.
Siegfried Sievers, a former Stasi member is responsible for the pollution of millions Germanys for many years with dioxins. This was unveiled at 5th of January 2011 by German prosecutors.
The victims say that Maurischat (probably also a Stasi cameo) and Sievers were in contact as Sievers acted as Stasi Agent and was in fact already a specialist in dioxins under the Communist Terror Regime in Eastern Germany.
Furthermore the Stasi Top Agent Ehrenfried Stelzer disguised as Professor for Criminal studies during the Communist Regime at the Eastern Berlin Humboldt University.
Background:
The man behind the Berlin lawyer Jochen Resch and his activities is Ehrenfried Stelzer, former Stasi Top officer in Berlin and “Professor for Criminal Studies” at the Eastern Berlin Humboldt University during the Communist regime, the SJB-GoMoPa-victims say (www.sjb-fonds-opfer.com) is responsable for the killing of German watchdog and journalist Heinz Gerlach.
These informations stem from various sources who were close to the criminal organization of GoMoPa in the last years. The SJB-GoMoPa say that the well-known German watchdog and journalist Heinz Gerlach was killed by former Stasi members with dioxins. Polychlorinated dibenzodioxins (PCDDs), or simply dioxins, are a group of organic polyhalogenated compounds that are significant because they act as environmental pollutants. They are commonly referred to as dioxins for simplicity in scientific publications because every PCDD molecule contains a dioxin skeletal structure. Typically, the p-dioxin skeleton is at the core of a PCDD molecule, giving the molecule a dibenzo-p-dioxin ring system. Members of the PCDD family have been shown to bioaccumulate in humans and wildlife due to their lipophilic properties, and are known teratogens, mutagens, and confirmed (avered) human carcinogens. They are organic compounds.
Dioxins build up primarily in fatty tissues over time (bioaccumulate), so even small exposures may eventually reach dangerous levels. In 1994, the US EPA reported that dioxins are a probable carcinogen, but noted that non-cancer effects (reproduction and sexual development, immune system) may pose an even greater threat to human health. TCDD, the most toxic of the dibenzodioxins, is classified as a Group 1 carcinogen by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC).
In 2004, a notable individual case of dioxin poisoning, Ukrainian politician Viktor Yushchenko was exposed to the second-largest measured dose of dioxins, according to the reports of the physicians responsible for diagnosing him. This is the first known case of a single high dose of TCDD dioxin poisoning, and was diagnosed only after a toxicologist recognized the symptoms of chloracne while viewing television news coverage of his condition.
German dioxin scandal: In January 2011 about 4700 German farms were banned from making deliveries after tests at the Harles und Jentzsch plant in the state of Schleswig-Holstein showed high levels of dioxin. Again this incident appears to involve PCBs and not PCDDs at all. Dioxin were found in animal feed and eggs in many farms. The person who is responsible for this, Siegfried Sievert is also a former Stasi Agent. At “GoMoPa” the notorious Eastern-Berlin press agency (see article below) one of the henchmen acted under the name of “Siegfried Siewert”.
Further evidence for the killing of Mr.Heinz Gerlach is provided by the SJB-GoMoPa-victims by analyzing the dubious role of former Stasi-Top-agent Ehrenfried Stelzer, also a former “Professor for Crime Studies” under the Communist regime in Eastern Germany and the dubious role of “detective” Medard Fuchsgruber. Both are closely tied to the dubious “GoMoPa” and Berlin lawyer Jochen Resch.
According to the SJB-GoMoPa-victims is Berlin lawyer Jochen Resch the mastermind of the criminal organization “GoMoPa2. The victims state that they have a source inside “GoMoPa” who helped them discover  the shocking truth. The so-called “Deep Throat from Berlin” has information that Resch had the idea to found the criminal organization “GoMoPa” and use non-existing Jewish lawyers  named Goldman, Morgenstern & Partner as camouflage. Their “office” in Madison Avenue, New York, is a mailbox. This is witnessed by a German Ex-Patriot, a lawyer, whose father, Heinz Gerlach, died under strange circumstances.
Resch seems to use “GoMoPa” as an instrument to blackmail parts of the German Property and Investment.

German authorities are under growing pressure to reopen investigations into at least a dozen suspicious deaths after the arrest of an alleged East German assassin cast new light on the communist regime. Stasi victims quoted a source saying “isolated units” had conducted operations that were “extremely well organised” and had “100 per cent logistical support” from the East German state.
A statement from prosecutors read: “The accused [Jurgen G] is suspected, as a member of a commando of the former DDR, of killing a number of people between 1976 and 1987 who from the point of view of the DDR regime had committed treason or were threatening to do so.”
Details of his Jurgen G’s arrest have been described in suitably florid terms, with the mass circulation tabloid Bild saying he was working at the Wolfsbruch marina near Rheinsberg in north-eastern Germany when a woman approached him. “Excuse me, is that your yellow Trabant in the car park? I just ran into it with my car,” she is said to have asked.
When he followed her to the car park, masked officers jumped out of vans and bushes and overpowered him in an operation worthy of the Stasi itself.
An eyewitness told Bild: “They blindfolded him and raced off in an unmarked car.”
Police across Germany are reported to be sifting through files to see who the victims may have been, and some intelligence officers are greeting the arrest of Jurgen G as a breakthrough.
Thomas Auerbach, who works for the Stasi file authority in Berlin and has written a book based on the death squad files, said: “These people were trained to make such murders look like accidents or suicides, even as ‘ordinary’ crimes such as robberies. They were real terror experts.”
The cases said to be linked to Jurgen G or his unit include many people involved with the commercial arm of the East German ruling socialist party, the SED (Socialist Unity Party).
Uwe Harms, the head of a Hamburg-based haulage firm which was part of a network of companies secretly owned by the SED, disappeared in March 1987 after conversations with various DDR functionaries. Six weeks later, his body was found in a plastic bag.
Weeks before his death he told friends that he felt he was being followed. After reunification, one of the other SED company heads said Mr Harms had been liquidated for refusing to allow his firm to be used to transport arms into East Germany.
Dieter Vogel, a businessman who had been jailed for life for spying for the CIA, was found suffocated in his cell in the East German prison Bautzen on March 9, 1982. The fact that he was due to be taken to the West in a spy swap arrangement just a few weeks later cast doubt on the suicide theory.
He had passed the names of several Stasi moles to the BND, West Germany’s heavily penetrated counter-intelligence service.
The Christian Democrat Union politician Uwe Barschel, 43, was found dead by magazine reporters in his bathtub in a hotel room in Geneva in October, 1987. He died of poisoning, but rumours that he was involved somehow in arms deals and the Stasi have clung to the case.
One of the more high-profile and enduring mysteries is that of Lutz Eigendorf, an East German footballer from the Stasi-backed Dynamo Berlin.
He fled to the West in 1979 amid great publicity. Four years later, he died after crashing his car into a tree on a straight stretch of road with blood alcohol levels way over the limit. Witnesses who had seen him earlier in the evening said he had not been drinking.
Most controversial though is the suggestion that the assassination squad was linked to the murder of a Swedish television reporter and her friend in 1984.
Cats Falk and her friend Lena Graens went missing on Nov 19, 1984. Their bodies were fished out of a Stockholm canal six months later.
Reports suggested a three-man assassination squad killed them, spiking their drinks with drugs, putting them into their car and pushing it into the Hammarby canal.
Shortly before her death, Cats Falk had reportedly uncovered a deal between an arms dealer and an East German firm.
Germany has recently undergone a wave of nostalgia for all things East German, dubbed Ostalgie, with colourful television shows featuring former DDR stars such as the ice skater Katerina Witt talking wistfully about socialist pop music.
A reassessment may be coming in the wake of the revelations.

Victims: The DDR-STASI MURDER GANG “GoMOPa” in murderoplot against Joerg Berger

The Stasi Murder Gang of „GoMoPa“ was involved in many trials to kill the popular East German soccer trainer Joerg Berger, Stasi victims tell in postings on their hompage http://www.sjb-fonds-opfer.com. Berger stated before his early death in his biography that they tried to pollute him with arsenic.
Arsenic and many of its compounds are especially potent poisons. Many water supplies close to mines are contaminated by these poisons. Arsenic disrupts ATP production through several mechanisms. At the level of the citric acid cycle, arsenic inhibits lipoic acid which is a cofactor for pyruvate dehydrogenase; and by competing with phosphate it uncouples oxidative phosphorylation, thus inhibiting energy-linked reduction of NAD+, mitochondrial respiration and ATP synthesis. Hydrogen peroxide production is also increased, which might form reactive oxygen species and oxidative stress. These metabolic interferences lead to death from multi-system organ failure, probably from necrotic cell death, not apoptosis. A post mortem reveals brick red coloured mucosa, owing to severe haemorrhage. Although arsenic causes toxicity, it can also play a protective role.[
Elemental arsenic and arsenic compounds are classified as “toxic” and “dangerous for the environment” in the European Union under directive 67/548/EEC. The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) recognizes arsenic and arsenic compounds as group 1 carcinogens, and the EU lists arsenic trioxide, arsenic pentoxide and arsenate salts as category 1 carcinogens.
Arsenic is known to cause arsenicosis owing to its manifestation in drinking water, “the most common species being arsenate [HAsO42- ; As(V)] and arsenite [H3AsO3 ; As(III)]”. The ability of arsenic to undergo redox conversion between As(III) and As(V) makes its availability in the environment more abundant. According to Croal, Gralnick, Malasarn and Newman, “[the] understanding [of] what stimulates As(III) oxidation and/or limits As(V) reduction is relevant for bioremediation of contaminated sites (Croal). The study of chemolithoautotrophic As(III) oxidizers and the heterotrophic As(V) reducers can help the understanding of the oxidation and/or reduction of arsenic.
Treatment of chronic arsenic poisoning is easily accomplished. British anti-lewisite (dimercaprol) is prescribed in dosages of 5 mg/kg up to 300 mg each 4 hours for the first day. Then administer the same dosage each 6 hours for the second day. Then prescribe this dosage each 8 hours for eight additional days. However the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) states that the long term effects of arsenic exposure cannot be predicted. Blood, urine, hair and nails may be tested for arsenic, however these tests cannot foresee possible health outcomes due to the exposure. Excretion occurs in the urine and long term exposure to arsenic has been linked to bladder and kidney cancer in addition to cancer of the liver, prostate, skin, lungs and nasal cavity.[
Occupational exposure and arsenic poisoning may occur in persons working in industries involving the use of inorganic arsenic and its compounds, such as wood preservation, glass production, nonferrous metal alloys and electronic semiconductor manufacturing. Inorganic arsenic is also found in coke oven emissions associated with the smelter industry.

THE DDR GESTAPO-STASI MURDER GANG responsable for the murder of Lutz Eigendorf

The talented Eigendorf played for East German side Dynamo Berlin.
He made his debut for the GDR in an August 1978 match against Bulgaria, immediately scoring his first two goals in a 2–2 draw. He went on to collect six caps, scoring three goals.[1] His final international was a February 1979 friendly match against Iraq.
On 20 March 1979, after a friendship match between Dynamo and West German club 1. FC Kaiserslautern in Gießen he fled to the west hoping to play for that team. But because of his defection he was banned from play for one year by UEFA and instead spent that time as a youth coach with the club.
This was not the first time an East German athlete had fled to the west, but it was a particularly embarrassing defection. Eigendorf’s club Dynamo was under the patronage of the Stasi, East Germany’s secretive state police, and subject to the personal attentions of the organisation’s head, Erich Mielke. He ensured that the club’s roster was made up of the country’s best players, as well as arranging for the manipulation of matches in Dynamo’s favour. After his defection Eigendorf openly criticised the DDR in the western media.
His wife Gabriele remained behind in Berlin with their daughter and was placed under constant police surveillance. Lawyers working for the Stasi quickly arranged a divorce and the former Frau Eigendorf re-married. Her new husband was eventually revealed as a Lothario – an agent of the state police whose role it was to spy on a suspect while romancing them.
In 1983 Eigendorf moved from Kaiserslautern to join Eintracht Braunschweig, all the while under the scrutiny of the Stasi who employed a number of West Germans as informants. On 5 March that year he was badly injured in a suspicious traffic accident and died within two days. An autopsy indicated a high blood alcohol level despite the testimony of people he had met with that evening indicating that Eigendorf had only a small amount of beer to drink.
After German re-unification and the subsequent opening of the files of the former East Germany’s state security service it was revealed that the traffic accident had been an assassination attempt orchestrated by the Stasi, confirming the longtime suspicions held by many. A summary report of the events surrounding Eigendorf’s death was made on German television on 22 March 2000 which detailed an investigation by Heribert Schwan in the documentary “Tod dem Verräter” (“Death to the Traitor”).
On 10 February 2010, a former East German spy revealed the Stasi ordered him to kill Eigendorf, which he claimed not to have done

MfS has been accused of a number of assassinations against political dissidents and other people both inside and outside the country. Examples include the East German football player Lutz Eigendorf and the Swedish journalist Cats Falck.
The terrorists who killed Alfred Herrhausen were professionals. They dressed as construction workers to lay a wire under the pavement of the road along Mr. Herrhausen’s usual route to work. They planted a sack of armor-piercing explosives on a parked bicycle by the roadside. An infrared beam shining across the road triggered the explosion just when the limousine, one of three cars in a convoy, sped by.
The operation, from the terrorists’ point of view, was flawless: Mr. Herrhausen, the chairman of one of Europe’s most powerful companies, Deutsche Bank, was killed in the explosion along that suburban Frankfurt road on Nov. 30, 1989.
But was everything what it seemed?
Within days, the Red Army Faction — a leftist terrorist group that had traumatized West Germany since 1970 with a series of high-profile crimes and brazen killings of bankers and industrialists — claimed responsibility for the assassination. An intense manhunt followed. In June 1990, police arrested 10 Red Army Faction members who had fled to East Germany to avoid arrest for other crimes. To the police’s surprise, they were willing to talk. Equally confounding to authorities: All had solid alibis. None was charged in the Herrhausen attack.
Now, almost two decades later, German police, prosecutors and other security officials have focused on a new suspect: the East German secret police, known as the Stasi. Long fodder for spy novelists like John le Carré, the shadowy Stasi controlled every aspect of East German life through imprisonment, intimidation and the use of informants — even placing a spy at one point in the office of West German Chancellor Willy Brandt.
According to documents reviewed by The Wall Street Journal, the murders of Mr. Herrhausen and others attributed to the Red Army Faction bear striking resemblance to methods and tactics pioneered by a special unit of the Stasi. The unit reported to Stasi boss Erich Mielke and actively sought in the waning years of the communist regime to imitate the Red Army Faction to mask their own attacks against prominent people in Western Germany and destabilize the country.
“The investigation has intensified in recent months,” said Frank Wallenta, a spokesman for the Federal Prosecutor. “And we are investigating everything, including leads to the Stasi.”
If those leads turn out to be true, it would mean not only rewriting some of the most dramatic episodes of the Cold War, but would likely accelerate a broader soul-searching now under way in Germany about the communist past.
In building a reunified country, many Germans have ignored discussion of the brutal realities of its former communist half. When the former East Germany is discussed, it’s often with nostalgia or empathy for brothers hostage to Soviet influence.

Stasi boss Erich Mielke, middle, with unnamed associates
That taboo is slowly being broken. Last year’s Oscar-winning movie, “The Lives of Others,” chronicled in dark detail a Stasi agent’s efforts to subvert the lives of ordinary people. Material in the Stasi archives shows that senior leaders had a shoot-to-kill order against those fleeing from East to West — a controversial order that contradicts East German leaders’ claims that they never ordered any shootings.
This story is based on more than a dozen interviews with police, prosecutors and other security officials. Several policemen and prosecutors confirmed that the allegation of extensive Stasi involvement with the Red Army Faction is a key part of the current investigation.
Court cases in West Germany in the 1990s established that members of the Red Army Faction were granted free passage to other countries in the 1970s and refuge in East Germany in the 1980s. But the current investigation and documents from Stasi archives suggest far deeper involvement — that members of the Red Army Faction were not only harbored by the Stasi but methodically trained in sophisticated techniques of bombing and murder.
Traudl Herrhausen, Mr. Herrhausen’s widow, is one of those pushing for further investigation. She says she long suspected involvement by the Stasi or other intelligence service such as the KGB, but never spoke publicly because she didn’t have evidence and didn’t want to interfere in the investigation. She says she is now breaking an 18-year silence in her desire to see justice done. “Now I want to look my husband’s killers in the eye,” she said in an interview.
The Red Army Faction was founded about 1970 by a band of leftists who justified their terrorism based on opposition to West Germany’s ruling elite. Killing members of this elite would provoke the West German state to take repressive measures that would show its true fascist face, Red Army Faction leaders believed.
In its early years, the group, also known as the Baader-Meinhof band, made headlines with prison breaks, bank robberies, bomb attacks and deadly shootouts. Four gang members led by Ulrike Meinhof freed Red Army Faction leader Andreas Baader from a Berlin jail a month after his arrest.
Red Army Faction violence in West Germany intensified in 1977 when Jürgen Ponto, then head of Dresdner Bank, was shot and killed at his home. Five weeks later, the group killed four people and abducted the chairman of the German employer association, Hans-Martin Schleyer, one of West Germany’s most prominent businessmen. It was the start of a six-week ordeal in which neither government nor terrorists would compromise. To support the Red Army Faction cause, Palestinian terrorists hijacked a Lufthansa jet in Spain, forcing it to land in Mogadishu, Somalia. After the plane was rushed by West German commandos, top Red Army Faction leaders in West Germany committed suicide and Mr. Schleyer was executed by his captors.
Red Army Faction violence began to abate in the late 1970s after the Lufthansa incident. Many in Germany thought the group — whose attacks were often crude — lost its will to kill after the arrest of its senior leaders in 1982. So when the group appeared to renew its terror campaign with a series of high-profile attacks in 1985, police were stunned by the level of their sophistication and determination.
This time, the group dazzled police with its ability to hit targets and leave little substantial evidence behind. They used high-tech devices no one thought they possessed. Their marksmen killed with military precision.

Weapons used by terrorists during the 1977 kidnapping of German industrialist Hanns-Martin Schleyer.
Surprisingly, members of the Red Army Faction so-called third generation had a policeman’s understanding of forensic science. From 1985 onward, the Red Army Faction rarely left a fingerprint or other useful piece of evidence at a crime scene, according to court records. The murder cases from this era are still open. Some suspected Stasi involvement, but no one could ever prove it, according to a senior police official.
The 1989 car-bomb murder of Mr. Herrhausen particularly stunned police with its audacity and sophistication. Mr. Herrhausen was the head of Deutsche Bank, Germany’s largest bank. He was part of the political-business elite that helped turn West Germany from a war-ravaged rump state into an economic powerhouse — all while East Germany languished in frustration. Mr. Herrhausen was a vocal proponent of a united Germany.
In November 1989, Mr. Herrhausen was following the fall of the Berlin wall and events in the Soviet Union closely, conferring frequently with Mikhail Gorbachev, according to his wife and friends. Then on Nov. 27, Mr. Herrhausen announced a plan to acquire the investment banking firm Morgan Grenfell — at the time a record-breaking bank acquisition.
Also during November, a spot along Mr. Herrhausen’s usual route to work was closed because of construction. Terrorists, dressed as construction workers, laid an electric wire under the road’s pavement. On Nov. 29, the stretch reopened.
On the morning of Nov. 30, like every workday morning, Mr. Herrhausen stepped into his limousine at about 8:30. Mr. Herrhausen’s driver waited about one minute to allow the first of the three-car entourage to drive ahead and survey the road.
“It was the route they hadn’t used in weeks,” Mrs. Herrhausen said.
As Mr. Herrhausen sped down the road, a team of terrorists waited. Beside the road, a parked bicycle held a sack of armor-piercing explosives. The detonator was connected by the electric wire under the road to a trigger activated by an interruption in an infrared beam shining across the road.
A terrorist activated the detonator after the first car of bodyguards drove past the bomb. Mr. Herrhausen died at the scene.
As they had during previous attacks, police set up dragnets to round up Red Army Faction cadre. But the June 1990 arrests of 10 members of the group who had earlier been granted political asylum in East Germany produced no leads. All the seized Red Army Faction members had solid alibis.
In July 1991, prosecutors believed they had a breakthrough when an informant claimed he had allowed two members of the Red Army Faction to stay at his home near the Herrhausen residence. Prosecutors followed that trail 13 years before dropping charges in 2004.
Frustrated with the inability of prosecutors to solve the Herrhausen case and believing that prosecutors were ignoring other leads including possible Stasi involvement, German officials replaced the prosecutor overseeing the case.
Police acknowledge that part of the reason for their focus on possible Stasi involvement was that all other leads had dried up. But they say they also knew that over the years the Stasi had worked with and given explosives to other terrorists, including “Carlos the Jackal” and the Basque group ETA in Spain. And in 2001 to 2003, an undercover police officer met with a man who claimed he had been a killer for the Stasi operating in Western Germany, although police were never able to tie him to specific murders.
German investigators turned their attention to Wartin, a small eastern German village nestled in yellow-brown fields of grain near the Polish border. Today, sheep graze in a field spotted with wooden posts.
In the 1980s, however, Wartin was home to the Stasi’s AGM/S — “Minister Working Group/Special Operations.” It got its name because it reported to Mr. Mielke, the minister who headed the Stasi for almost all of East Germany’s 40-year history.
The Wartin unit’s peacetime duties included the kidnapping and murder of influential people in the West, according to Stasi records reviewed by The Wall Street Journal in the Stasi archives in Berlin.
The documents say the unit’s activities included “intimidating anti-communist opinion leaders” by “liquidation,” and “kidnapping or hostage taking, connected with the demand that political messages be read,” according to a description of the unit’s activities written by a senior Wartin official in 1982.
Based on these documents, German investigators increasingly believe that the Stasi played a more active role than previously believed in Red Army Faction terrorism. After years of not being able to draw parallels between the Stasi unit in Wartin and the Red Army Faction killings, police are now focusing closely on such a link. Joachim Lampe, who assisted the successful prosecution of the first wave of Red Army Faction terrorists up until 1982 and was then assigned to prosecute Stasi-related crimes in West Germany, says it’s time to compare the activities of Wartin with the activities of the Red Army Faction to see where they overlap. “It is an important line of investigation,” he said.
A year after the Red Army Faction’s first generation collapsed in 1972, an internal Wartin report said cooperation with terrorists is possible if the individuals could be trusted to maintain secrecy and obey orders. Initial contacts, however, may not have taken place until later in the decade. Disillusionment gripped many of the terrorists living on the lam, according to court records citing witness statements by accused terrorists. Beginning about 1980, the Stasi granted refuge to 10 members of the Red Army Faction in East Germany and gave them assumed identities.
The Stasi sympathized with the anti-capitalist ideals of the Red Army Faction, but Stasi leaders were concerned about placing their trust in a group of uncontrollable leftist militants, a review of Stasi records shows. Stasi officials did not want to tarnish East Germany’s international reputation, so they toyed with different concepts for cooperation with terrorist groups, according to a prosecutor who has investigated Stasi involvement with terrorism.
One suggestion, contained in a document prepared for new officers assigned to the unit, was to emulate Romanian intelligence, which successfully worked with the terrorist “Carlos” to bomb the Radio Free Europe office in Munich, Germany, in 1981. To assist in such operations, the Wartin unit developed highly specialized explosives, poisons and miniature firearms.
About 1980 the Stasi also proposed a second strategy: instead of using a terrorist group directly — such cooperation always contained risk of discovery — they could simply execute attacks so similar to those of known terrorists that police would never look for a second set of suspects, according to Wartin records. The Wartin leadership called this strategy the “perpetrator principle,” according to Stasi records. The unit’s progress in implementing the steps to imitate terrorist attacks is described in a series of progress reports by Wartin officials between 1980 and 1987.
In September 1981, Red Army Faction terrorists attempted to kill U.S. Gen. James Kroesen in Heidelberg, Germany, shooting a bazooka at his car. About the same time, members of the same Red Army Faction team visited East Germany, where they were asked by the Stasi to shoot a bazooka at a car containing a dog. The dog died, according to court records.
In Wartin, officials wrote up a detailed description of the Red Army Faction members’ re-enactment of the Kroesen attack. “It is important to collect all accessible information about the terrorist scene in imperialist countries, to study and analyze their equipment, methods and tactics, so we can do it ourselves,” a senior Wartin official wrote in February 1982, according to the report.
In 1982, West German police discovered two troves of Red Army Faction weapons and documents buried in German forests. Three terrorists, including Red Army Faction leader Christian Klar, were arrested when they approached the sites. The troves were buried in locations easy to find at night, a tactic used by Wartin’s own agents to store operational equipment in West Germany, according to an investigator who viewed the troves and Stasi records.
That same year, a Wartin official described the staged bombing of a moving vehicle. According to the report, several Stasi officers shed “tears of joy” when electronic sensors detected the approaching car and ignited the detonator.
A spokesman at Germany’s federal police investigative agency, the equivalent of the U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation, declined to comment on the close similarity between the detonator used in the demonstration and the device that killed Mr. Herrhausen, saying this is part of their investigation.
Wartin officers continued their preparations for imitating terrorist attacks in West Germany, according to a 1985 internal Wartin report. They created a special archive profiling the characteristics of known terrorists and terrorist groups, and taught staff members to execute nearly identical attacks, according to Stasi records. Each year, the unit’s officers detailed the unit’s success in teaching these techniques in their annual reports, according to the reports.
Then, in 1987, the AGM/S stopped offensive operations. The unit was disbanded.
Werner Grossmann, a former three-star Stasi General and former head of foreign intelligence operations, says the AGM/S was responsible for planning attacks in West Germany, but was dissolved “because it didn’t produce results.” Mr. Grossmann assumed control of part of the AGM/S after most of the unit was dissolved.
Mr. Grossmann says he took control of part of the AGM/S because he wanted to run intelligence operations against West Germany’s civil defense infrastructure.
“I refused to have anything to do with terrorism and terrorists,” Mr. Grossmann said in an interview. He said he didn’t have any influence over the AGM/S activities before 1987 and wasn’t informed about the unit’s activities before it came under his control.
Olaf Barnickel, a career Stasi officer who served at Wartin, says his unit planned murders in West Germany, but never committed one. “It was all theory and no practice,” Mr. Barnickel said in an interview.
But some German police are unpersuaded. They believe the seeds may have been planted for future violent attacks.
In November 1989, as East Germany disintegrated, groups of citizens forced their way into Stasi installations, seizing control. In Wartin, a local church minister led a group of demonstrators to the main entrance of the Stasi base. The base closed.
Within the Stasi as a whole, the chain of command began to disintegrate. Links to organizations in West Germany, including the Red Army Faction, were broken.
Sixteen months after Mr. Herrhausen’s murder, the Red Army Faction claimed its last victim, killing Detlev Karsten Rohwedder, the head of the Treuhandanstalt, the powerful trust that controlled most state-owned assets in the former East Germany and was overseeing their privatization. Mr. Rohwedder was killed while he was standing by the window of his house in Düsseldorf.
The murder was performed by a trained sharpshooter, according to a police official familiar with the investigation. The Stasi trained members of the Red Army Faction in sharpshooting skills and had its own teams of sharpshooters, according to witness statements by Stasi officials to a Berlin prosecutor and Stasi records.
In 1998, the Red Army Faction issued the last of its communiques, announcing it was disbanding. German police attribute the group’s disappearance to changing times, which made the group seem a relic of the past. Indeed, the Red Army Faction today is largely seen by the German public as part of the social upheaval that plagued West Germany in the 1970s and 1980s. More than one in four Germans consider former Red Army Faction members to have been misguided idealists. More than half now think the investigations should be closed for good in the coming decade when the current group of Red Army Faction prisoners finish serving their prison sentences.
German prosecutors say their investigation of the Stasi’s role is continuing.
Since last month, Mrs. Herrhausen has been in contact with the next of kin of victims in the other unsolved Red Army Faction murder cases, looking for support to push the investigation. The bomb that killed her husband nearly 18 years ago exploded soon after he left for work, within earshot of their home in suburban Frankfurt.
“I still hear that bomb every day,” she says.

Only two articles let the German audience believe that the famous journalist and watchdog Heinz Gerlach died on natural courses by blood pollution.
The first one, published only hours after the death of Mr Heinz Gerlach by the notorious “GoMoPa” (see article below) and a second 3 days later by a small German local newspaper, Weserbergland Nachrichten.
Many people including the hostile Gerlach website “Akte Heinz Gerlach” doubted that this man who had so many enemies and friends would die of natural causes without any previous warning. Rumours occured that Mr. Gerlach’s doctor doubted natural courses at all. After many critical voices discussed the issue a small website of a small German local newspaper – which never before had reported about Mr. Heinz Gerlach and which is not even in the region of Mr Gerlachs home – published that Mr Gerlach died of blood pollution. Weserbergland-Nachrichten published a long article about the deadly consequences of blood pollution and did not even name the source of such an important statement. It claimed only that somebody of Gerlachs inner circle had said this. It is a proven fact that after the collpase of the Eastern German Communist Regime many former Communist propaganda agents went to regional newspapers – often in Western Germany like Günther Schabowski did the man who opened the “Mauer”.
The theatre stage was set: One day later the hostile Gerlach website “Akte Heinz Gerlach” took the agenda publishing that Mr Gerlach had died for natural causes without any further research at all.
This was done by a website which for months and months and months reported everything about Mr. Gerlach.
Furthermore a research proves that the technical details regarding the website hosting of this hostile website “Akte Heinz Gerlach” proves that there are common details with the hosting of “GoMoPa” and their affiliates as proven by the SJB-GoMoPa-victims (see http://www.sjb-fonds-opfer.com)
Insiders believe that the murderers of Mr. Heinz Gerlach are former members of the Eastern German Terror Organisation “Stasi” with dioxins. They also believe that “GoMoPa” was part of the plot. At “GoMoPa”’ a person named Siegfried Siewers was officialy responsible for the press but never appeared in public. “GoMoPa”-victims say that this name was a cameo for “GoMoPa” frontrunner Klaus Maurischat who is controlled by the Stasi Top Agent Ehrenfried Stelzner, Berlin.
Siegfried Sievers, a former Stasi member is responsible for the pollution of millions Germanys for many years with dioxins. This was unveiled at 5th of January 2011 by German prosecutors.
The victims say that Maurischat (probably also a Stasi cameo) and Sievers were in contact as Sievers acted as Stasi Agent and was in fact already a specialist in dioxins under the Communist Terror Regime in Eastern Germany.
Furthermore the Stasi Top Agent Ehrenfried Stelzer disguised as Professor for Criminal studies during the Communist Regime at the Eastern Berlin Humboldt University.
Background:
The man behind the Berlin lawyer Jochen Resch and his activities is Ehrenfried Stelzer, former Stasi Top officer in Berlin and “Professor for Criminal Studies” at the Eastern Berlin Humboldt University during the Communist regime, the SJB-GoMoPa-victims say (www.sjb-fonds-opfer.com) is responsable for the killing of German watchdog and journalist Heinz Gerlach.
These informations stem from various sources who were close to the criminal organization of GoMoPa in the last years. The SJB-GoMoPa say that the well-known German watchdog and journalist Heinz Gerlach was killed by former Stasi members with dioxins. Polychlorinated dibenzodioxins (PCDDs), or simply dioxins, are a group of organic polyhalogenated compounds that are significant because they act as environmental pollutants. They are commonly referred to as dioxins for simplicity in scientific publications because every PCDD molecule contains a dioxin skeletal structure. Typically, the p-dioxin skeleton is at the core of a PCDD molecule, giving the molecule a dibenzo-p-dioxin ring system. Members of the PCDD family have been shown to bioaccumulate in humans and wildlife due to their lipophilic properties, and are known teratogens, mutagens, and confirmed (avered) human carcinogens. They are organic compounds.
Dioxins build up primarily in fatty tissues over time (bioaccumulate), so even small exposures may eventually reach dangerous levels. In 1994, the US EPA reported that dioxins are a probable carcinogen, but noted that non-cancer effects (reproduction and sexual development, immune system) may pose an even greater threat to human health. TCDD, the most toxic of the dibenzodioxins, is classified as a Group 1 carcinogen by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC).
In 2004, a notable individual case of dioxin poisoning, Ukrainian politician Viktor Yushchenko was exposed to the second-largest measured dose of dioxins, according to the reports of the physicians responsible for diagnosing him. This is the first known case of a single high dose of TCDD dioxin poisoning, and was diagnosed only after a toxicologist recognized the symptoms of chloracne while viewing television news coverage of his condition.
German dioxin scandal: In January 2011 about 4700 German farms were banned from making deliveries after tests at the Harles und Jentzsch plant in the state of Schleswig-Holstein showed high levels of dioxin. Again this incident appears to involve PCBs and not PCDDs at all. Dioxin were found in animal feed and eggs in many farms. The person who is responsible for this, Siegfried Sievert is also a former Stasi Agent. At “GoMoPa” the notorious Eastern-Berlin press agency (see article below) one of the henchmen acted under the name of “Siegfried Siewert”.
Further evidence for the killing of Mr.Heinz Gerlach is provided by the SJB-GoMoPa-victims by analyzing the dubious role of former Stasi-Top-agent Ehrenfried Stelzer, also a former “Professor for Crime Studies” under the Communist regime in Eastern Germany and the dubious role of “detective” Medard Fuchsgruber. Both are closely tied to the dubious “GoMoPa” and Berlin lawyer Jochen Resch.
According to the SJB-GoMoPa-victims is Berlin lawyer Jochen Resch the mastermind of the criminal organization “GoMoPa2. The victims state that they have a source inside “GoMoPa” who helped them discover  the shocking truth. The so-called “Deep Throat from Berlin” has information that Resch had the idea to found the criminal organization “GoMoPa” and use non-existing Jewish lawyers  named Goldman, Morgenstern & Partner as camouflage. Their “office” in Madison Avenue, New York, is a mailbox. This is witnessed by a German Ex-Patriot, a lawyer, whose father, Heinz Gerlach, died under strange circumstances.
Resch seems to use “GoMoPa” as an instrument to blackmail parts of the German Property and Investment.

The name of Benno Ohnesorg became a rallying cry for the West German left after he was shot dead by police in 1967. Newly discovered documents indicate that the cop who shot him may have been a spy for the East German secret police.
It was one of the most important events leading up to the wave of radical left-wing violence which washed over West Germany in the 1970s. On the evening of June 2, 1967, the literature student Benno Ohnesorg took part in a demonstration at West Berlin’s opera house. Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, the shah of Iran, was to attend and the gathered students wanted to call attention to his brutal regime.
The protests, though, got out of hand. Pro-shah demonstrators, some of them flown in from Iran for the occasion, battled with the student protestors. West Berlin police also did their part, brutally beating back the crowd. At 8:30 p.m., a shot was fired, and a short time later the 26-year-old Ohnesorg, having been hit in the back of the head, became the left wing’s first martyr.
Now, though, the history of the event may have to be re-written. New documents discovered in the Stasi archive — the vast collection of files left behind by the East German secret police — reveal that the policeman who shot Ohnesorg, Karl-Heinz Kurras, could in fact have been a spy for East Germany’s communist regime.
In an article that will appear in late May in Deutschlandarchiv, a periodical dedicated to the ongoing project of German reunification, Helmut Müller-Enbergs and Cornelia Jabs reveal that documents they found in the Stasi papers show that Kurras began working together with the Stasi in 1955. He had wanted to move to East Berlin to work for the East German police. Instead, he signed an agreement with the Stasi to remain with the West Berlin police force and spy for the communist state.
As a result of the new information, criminal charges have once again been filed against Kurras, who was acquitted twice, once in 1967 and again in 1970, of negligent homicide charges related to Ohnesorg’s death. Kurras told the Berlin paper Tagesspiegel on Friday that he had never worked together with the Stasi.
But in addition to finding the agreement between Kurras and the Stasi, the two researchers also discovered numerous documents indicating that the East Germans were pleased with the information Kurras passed along — particularly given that he was posted to a division responsible for rooting out moles within the West German police force.
Immediately after Ohnesorg’s death, Kurras received a Stasi communication ordering him to destroy his records and to “cease activities for the moment.” Kurras responded with his acquiescence and wrote “I need money for an attorney.”
The exact circumstances surrounding the death of Ohnesorg have never been completely clarified. Kurras himself, now 81, gave conflicting versions of the story during the investigation but the official version has long been that Kurras fired in self defense. Many others point to witness accounts whereby the police were beating Ohnesorg when the shot was fired.
It is still unclear how the new evidence might play into history’s understanding of the tragic event. The day was one full of violence, with demonstrators and police battling each other with pipes, wooden clubs and stones. Police were further incited by rumors that an officer had been stabbed earlier in the evening. Ohnesorg himself, however, was not directly involved in the violence.
West Berlin in the 1960s and 70s became a focal point of German left wing radicalism. The city had long been left-leaning, and the fact that Berliners were exempt from military service meant that it became a magnate for pacifists and anti-state activists.
Ohnesorg’s death gave them an immediate rallying cry. As the left-wing movement became more radical, many justified their violent activities by pointing to the police brutality that led to the student’s death. A letter written by Ulrike Meinhof announcing the founding of the Red Army Faction, which appeared in SPIEGEL in the fall of 1967, explicitly mentioned the Ohnesorg incident. The RAF went on to terrorize Germany for decades, ultimately killing over 30 people across the country. The radical “June 2 Movement” used the date of the incident in its name.
Kurras, for his part, seems to have been a highly valued Stasi agent. In his files, it is noted that “he is prepared to complete any task assigned to him.” It also mentions that he is notable for having the “courage and temerity necessary to accomplish difficult missions.”

Now it seems the STASI is back again in business after transforming it in to the CYBER-STASI of the 21st Century.

The serial betrayer and cyberstalker Klaus Maurischat is on the run again. The latest action against him (see below) cause him to react in a series of fake statements and “press releases” – one more absurd than the other. Insider analyze that his criminal organisation “GoMoPa” is about to fade away.

On our request the German criminal police (Kriminalpolizei) has opened new cases against the notorious “GoMoPa” organisation which already fled in the underground. Insiders say they have killed German journalist and watchdog Heinz Gerlach and their criminal record is bigger than the Encyclopedia – Britannica

The case is also directed against Google, Germany, whilst supporting criminal action of “GoMoPa” for years and therefore give them the chance to blackmail successfull businessman. This case is therefore an example and will be followed by many others as far as we can project. Furthermore we will bring the case to the attention of the German lawyers community which will not tolerate such misconduct by Googles German legal representative Dr. Arndt Haller and we will bring the case to the attention ofGoogle Inc in Mountain View, USA, and the American ministry of Justice to stop the Cyberstalkers once and for all.
Besides that many legal institutions, individuals and firms have already contacted us to help to clarify the death of Mr. Heinz Gerlach and to prosecute his murderers and their backers.
The case number is ST/0148943/2011

In a series of interviews beginning 11 months before the sudden death of German watchdog Heinz Gerlach Berlin lawyer Joschen Resch unveilved secrets of Gerlach, insiders say. Secret documents from Mr Gerlachs computer were published on two dubious hostile German websites. Both have a lot of similarities in their internet registration. One the notorious “GoMoPa” website belongs to a n Eastern German organization which calls itself “
Numerous attempts have been made to stop our research and the publication of the stories by “GoMoPa” members in camouflage thus confirming the truth and the substance of it in a superior way.
Only two articles let the German audience believe that the famous journalist and watchdog Heinz Gerlach died on natural courses by blood pollution. The first one, published only hours after the death of Mr Heinz Gerlach by the notorious “GoMoPa” (see article below) and a second 3 days later by a small German local newspaper, Weserbergland Nachrichten.

Many people including the hostile Gerlach website “Akte Heinz Gerlach” doubted that this man who had so many enemies and friends would die of natural causes without any previous warning. Rumours occured that Mr. Gerlach’s doctor doubted natural courses at all. After many critical voices discussed the issue a small website of a small German local newspaper – which never before had reported about Mr. Heinz Gerlach and which is not even in the region of Mr Gerlachs home – published that Mr Gerlach died of blood pollution. Weserbergland-Nachrichten published a long article about the deadly consequences of blood pollution and did not even name the source of such an important statement. It claimed only that somebody of Gerlachs inner circle had said this. It is a proven fact that after the collpase of the Eastern German Communist Regime many former Communist propaganda agents went to regional newspapers – often in Western Germany like Günther Schabowski did the man who opened the “Mauer”.

The theatre stage was set: One day later the hostile Gerlach website “Akte Heinz Gerlach” took the agenda publishing that Mr Gerlach had died for natural causes without any further research at all.

This was done by a website which for months and months and months reported everything about Mr. Gerlach.
Furthermore a research proves that the technical details regarding the website hosting of this hostile website “Akte Heinz Gerlach” proves that there are common details with the hosting of “GoMoPa” and their affiliates as proven by the SJB-GoMoPa-victims (see http://www.sjb-fonds-opfer.com)

Insiders believe that the murderers of Mr. Heinz Gerlach are former members of the Eastern German Terror Organisation “Stasi” with dioxins. They also believe that “GoMoPa” was part of the plot. At “GoMoPa”’ a person named Siegfried Siewers was officialy responsible for the press but never appeared in public. “GoMoPa”-victims say that this name was a cameo for “GoMoPa” frontrunner Klaus Maurischat who is controlled by the Stasi Top Agent Ehrenfried Stelznr, Berlin.

Siegfried Sievers, a former Stasi member is responsible for the pollution of millions Germanys for many years with dioxins. This was unveiled at 5th of January 2011 by German prosecutors.
The victims say that Maurischat (probably also a Stasi cameo) and Sievers were in contact as Sievers acted as Stasi Agent and was in fact already a specialist in dioxins under the Communist Terror

The Stasi murder:
„GoMoPa“ & Backers: Blackmailing, Extortion, Racketeering, Internet Murder and Murder. These are the weapons of the East-German “NACHRICHTENDIENST” “GoMoPa”, a renegate confesses.
Deep Throat, Berlin; confesses: „Since months the „GoMoPa“ keyfigures like Klaus-Dieter Maurischat< are in hide-aways because the German police is hunting them for the wirecard fraud and a lot of other criminal actions. I left the group when I noticed that. The found and former Stasi-Colonel Ehrenfried Stelzer died under strange circumstances in Berlin. This has been told to us. But it is also possible that his death was staged. In any case the criminal organization of “GoMoPa” is responsible for the murder of Heinz Gerlach by dioxin. Now my life is also in danger that is why I hide myself.”
According to Deep Throat, Hans J. the murder was done with the help of the old Stasi-connections of the “NACHRICHTENDIENST” “GoMoPa”.
The renegate says that computer hacker Thomas Promny and Sven Schmidt are responsible for the computer crimes and he states that the crime organization of “GoMoPa” has also helpers inside internet companies like Go-Daddy, Media-on and even in Google, Hamburg..

THE “NACHRICHTENDIENST”:New criminal police action against “GoMoPa”:

German criminal police (Kriminalpolizei) has opened new cases against the notorious “GoMoPa” organisation which already fled in the underground.

On our request the German criminal police (Kriminalpolizei) has opened new cases against the notorious “GoMoPa” organisation which already fled in the underground. Insiders say they have killed German journalist and watchdog Heinz Gerlach and their criminal record is bigger than the
Encyclopedia – Britannica

The case is also directed against Google, Germany, whilst supporting criminal action of “GoMoPa” for years and therefore give them the chance to blackmail successfull businessman. This case is therefore an example and will be followed by many others as far as we can project. Furthermore we will bring the case to the attention of the German lawyers community which will not tolerate such misconduct by Googles German legal representative Dr. Arndt Haller and we will bring the case to the attention of Google Inc in Mountain View, USA, and the American ministry of Justice to stop the Cyberstalkers once and for all.

Besides that many legal institutions, individuals and firms have already contacted us to help to clarify the death of Mr. Heinz Gerlach and to prosecute his murderers and their backers.

The case number is

ST/0148943/2011

Stasi-Dioxin: The “NACHRICHTENDIENST”  searching for the perfect murder:

Viktor Yushchenko was running against Prime Minister Viktor Yanukovych. Yanukovych was a political ally of outgoing president Leonid Kuchma. Kuchma’s administration depended upon corruption and dishonesty for its power. Government officials ruled with a sense of terror rather than justice. For the powerful and wealthy few, having Yanukovych elected president was important. Should Yushchenko win, Ukraine’s government was sure to topple. Yushchenko’s campaign promises included a better quality of life for Ukrainians through democracy. His wife, Katherine, told CBS in a 2005 interview, “He was a great threat to the old system, where there was a great deal of corruption, where people were making millions, if not billions.”
On September 6, 2004, Yushchenko became ill after dining with leaders of the Ukrainian secret police. Unlike other social or political engagements, this dinner did not include anyone else on Yushchenko’s team. No precautions were taken regarding the food. Within hours after the dinner, Yushchenko began vomiting violently. His face became paralyzed; he could not speak or read. He developed a severe stomachache and backache as well as gastrointestinal pain. Outwardly, Yushchenko developed what is known as chloracne, a serious skin condition that leaves the face scarred and disfigured.
By December 2004, doctors had determined that Yushchenko had been the victim of dioxin poisoning. Dioxin is a name given to a group of related toxins that can cause cancer and even death. Dioxin was used in the biochemical weapon called Agent Orange during the Vietnam War controversial war in which the United States aidedSouth Vietnam in its fight against a takeover by Communist North Vietnam). Yushchenko had a dioxin level six thousand times greater than that normally found in the bloodstream. His is the second-highest level ever recorded.
Yushchenko immediately suspected he had been poisoned, though Kuchma’s camp passionately denied such allegations. Instead, when Yushchenko showed up at a parliamentary meeting shortly after the poisoning incident, Kuchma’s men teased him, saying he must have had too much to drink or was out too late the night before.
Dioxin can stay in the body for up to thirty-five years. Experts predict that his swelling and scars will fade but never completely disappear. John Henry, a toxicologist at London’s Imperial Hospital, told RedNova.com, “It’ll be a couple of years, and he will always be a bit pockmarked. After damage as heavy as that, I think he will not return to his film star looks.” And Yushchenko will live with the constant threat of cancer.
At first it was believed the poison must have come from a Russian laboratory. Russia was a strong supporter of Kuchma and lobbied against Yushchenko in the 2004 election. But by July 2005, Yushchenko’s security forces were able to trace the poison to a lab in Ukraine. Though not entirely ruling out Russia’s involvement, Yushchenko is quoted on his Web site as saying “I’m sure that even though some people are running from the investigation, we will get them. I am not afraid of anything or anybody.”

Evidence shows that such a perfect murder plotted by former Stasi agents is the cause of the death of German watchdog and journalist Heinz Gerlach.

The Ministry for State Security (German: Ministerium für Staatssicherheit (MfS), commonly known as the Stasi (IPA: [‘?tazi?]) (abbreviation German: Staatssicherheit, literally State Security), was the official state security service of East Germany. The MfS was headquartered in East Berlin, with an extensive complex in Berlin-Lichtenberg and several smaller facilities throughout the city. It was widely regarded as one of the most effective and repressive intelligence and secret police agencies in the world. The MfS motto was “Schild und Schwert der Partei” (Shield and Sword of the Party), that is the ruling Socialist Unity Party of Germany (SED).

According to the confessions of an informer, Berlin lawyer Jochen Resch writes most of the “articles” of the communist “STASI” agency “GoMoPa” himself or it is done by lawyers of his firm. The whistleblower states that lawyer Resch is the mastermind behind the “CYBER-STASI” called “NACHRICHTENDIENST” “GoMoPa”. Bizarre enough they use Jewish names of non-existing Jewish lawyers by the name of “Goldman, Morgenstern and Partner” to stage their bogus “firm”.  Further involved in their complots are a “detective” Medard Fuchsgruber and “STASI”-Colonel Ehrenfried Stelzer, “the first crime expert” in the former communist East-Germany.
According to London based Meridian Capital hundreds and thousands of wealthy people and companies have paid to the “NACHRICHTENDIENST” to avoid their cyberstalking (see article below).
Finally the German criminal police started their investigations (case number ST/0148943/2011).
The “NACHRICHTENDIENST” is also involved in the death of the well-known German watchdog and journalist Heinz Gerlach who died under strange circumstances in July 2010.
Only hours after his death the “NACHRICHTENDIENST” was spreading the news that Mr Gerlach died of blood pollution and set the stage for a fairy tale. Months before his death the “NACHRICHTENDIENST” started a campaign to ruin his reputation and presumably was also responsable for cyberattacks to bring his website down. In fact they presumably used the same tactics also against our servers. Therefore we investigated all internet details of them and handed the facts to the FBI and international authorities.

Story background:
Now it seems the STASI is back again in business after transforming it in to the CYBER-STASI of the 21st Century.

The serial betrayer and  cyberstalker Klaus Maurischat is on the run again. The latest action against him (see below) cause him to react in a series of fake statements and “press releases” – one more absurd than the other. Insider analyze that his criminal organisation “GoMoPa” is about to fade away.
On our request the German criminal police (Kriminalpolizei) has opened new cases against the notorious “GoMoPa” organisation which already fled in the underground. Insiders  say they  have killed German journalist and watchdog Heinz Gerlach and their criminal record is bigger than the Encyclopedia – Britannica
The case is also directed against Google, Germany, whilst supporting criminal action of  “GoMoPa” for years and therefore give them the chance to blackmail successfull businessman. This case is therefore an example and will be followed by many others as far as we can project. Furthermore we will bring the case to the attention of the German lawyers community which will not tolerate such misconduct by Googles German legal representative Dr. Arndt Haller and we will bring the case to the attention of Google Inc in Mountain View, USA, and the American ministry of Justice to stop the Cyberstalkers once and for all.
Besides that many legal institutions,  individuals and firms have already contacted us to help to clarify the death of Mr. Heinz Gerlach and to prosecute his murderers and their backers.
The case number is ST/0148943/2011
In a series of interviews beginning 11 months before the sudden death of German watchdog Heinz Gerlach Berlin lawyer Joschen Resch unveilved secrets of Gerlach, insiders say. Secret documents from Mr Gerlachs computer were published on two dubious hostile German websites. Both have a lot of similarities in their internet registration. One the notorious “GoMoPa” website belongs to a n Eastern German organization which calls itself “
Numerous attempts have been made to stop our research and the publication of the stories by “GoMoPa” members in camouflage thus confirming the truth and the substance of it in a superior way.
Only two articles let the German audience believe that the famous journalist and watchdog Heinz Gerlach died on natural courses by blood pollution. The first one, published only hours after the death of Mr Heinz Gerlach by the notorious “GoMoPa” (see article below) and a second 3 days later by a small German local newspaper, Weserbergland Nachrichten.

Many people including the hostile Gerlach website “Akte Heinz Gerlach” doubted that this man who had so many enemies and friends would die of natural causes without any previous warning. Rumours occured that Mr. Gerlach’s doctor doubted natural courses at all. After many critical voices discussed the issue a small website of a small German local newspaper – which never before had reported about Mr. Heinz Gerlach and which is not even in the region of Mr Gerlachs home – published that Mr Gerlach died of blood pollution. Weserbergland-Nachrichten published a long article about the deadly consequences of blood pollution and did not even name the source of such an important statement. It claimed only that somebody of Gerlachs inner circle had said this. It is a proven fact that after the collpase of the Eastern German Communist Regime many former Communist propaganda agents went to regional newspapers – often in Western Germany like Günther Schabowski did the man who opened the “Mauer”.

The theatre stage was set: One day later the hostile Gerlach website “Akte Heinz Gerlach” took the agenda publishing that Mr Gerlach had died for natural causes without any further research at all.

This was done by a website which for months and months and months reported everything about Mr. Gerlach.
Furthermore a research proves that the technical details regarding the website hosting of this hostile website “Akte Heinz Gerlach” proves that there are common details with the hosting of “GoMoPa” and their affiliates as proven by the SJB-GoMoPa-victims (see http://www.sjb-fonds-opfer.com)
Insiders believe that the murderers of Mr. Heinz Gerlach are former members of the Eastern German Terror Organisation “Stasi” with dioxins. They also believe that “GoMoPa” was part of the plot. At “GoMoPa”’ a person named Siegfried Siewers was officialy responsible for the press but never appeared in public. “GoMoPa”-victims say that this name was a cameo for “GoMoPa” frontrunner Klaus Maurischat who is controlled by the Stasi Top Agent Ehrenfried Stelzner, Berlin.

Siegfried Sievers, a former Stasi member is responsible for the pollution of millions Germanys for many years with dioxins. This was unveiled at 5th of January 2011 by German prosecutors.
The victims say that Maurischat (probably also a Stasi cameo) and Sievers were in contact as Sievers acted as Stasi Agent and was in fact already a specialist in dioxins under the Communist Terror Regime in Eastern Germany.
Furthermore the Stasi Top Agent Ehrenfried Stelzer disguised as Professor for Criminal studies during the Communist Regime at the Eastern Berlin Humboldt University.

Background:
The man behind the Berlin lawyer Jochen Resch and his activities is Ehrenfried Stelzer, former Stasi Top officer in Berlin and “Professor for Criminal Studies” at the Eastern Berlin Humboldt University during the Communist regime, the SJB-GoMoPa-victims say (www.sjb-fonds-opfer.com) is responsable for the killing of German watchdog and journalist Heinz Gerlach.
These informations stem from various sources who were close to the criminal organization of GoMoPa in the last years. The SJB-GoMoPa say that the well-known German watchdog and journalist Heinz Gerlach was killed by former Stasi members with dioxins. Polychlorinated dibenzodioxins (PCDDs), or simply dioxins, are a group of organic polyhalogenated compounds that are significant because they act as environmental pollutants. They are commonly referred to as dioxins for simplicity in scientific publications because every PCDD molecule contains a dioxin skeletal structure. Typically, the p-dioxin skeleton is at the core of a PCDD molecule, giving the molecule a dibenzo-p-dioxin ring system. Members of the PCDD family have been shown to bioaccumulate in humans and wildlife due to their lipophilic properties, and are known teratogens, mutagens, and confirmed (avered) human carcinogens. They are organic compounds.
Dioxins build up primarily in fatty tissues over time (bioaccumulate), so even small exposures may eventually reach dangerous levels. In 1994, the US EPA reported that dioxins are a probable carcinogen, but noted that non-cancer effects (reproduction and sexual development, immune system) may pose an even greater threat to human health. TCDD, the most toxic of the dibenzodioxins, is classified as a Group 1 carcinogen by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC).
In 2004, a notable individual case of dioxin poisoning, Ukrainian politician Viktor Yushchenko was exposed to the second-largest measured dose of dioxins, according to the reports of the physicians responsible for diagnosing him. This is the first known case of a single high dose of TCDD dioxin poisoning, and was diagnosed only after a toxicologist recognized the symptoms of chloracne while viewing television news coverage of his condition.
German dioxin scandal: In January 2011 about 4700 German farms were banned from making deliveries after tests at the Harles und Jentzsch plant in the state of Schleswig-Holstein showed high levels of dioxin. Again this incident appears to involve PCBs and not PCDDs at all. Dioxin were found in animal feed and eggs in many farms. The person who is responsible for this, Siegfried Sievert is also a former Stasi Agent. At “GoMoPa” the notorious Eastern-Berlin press agency (see article below) one of the henchmen acted under the name of “Siegfried Siewert”.
Further evidence for the killing of Mr.Heinz Gerlach is provided by the SJB-GoMoPa-victims by analyzing the dubious role of former Stasi-Top-agent Ehrenfried Stelzer, also a former “Professor for Crime Studies” under the Communist regime in Eastern Germany and the dubious role of “detective” Medard Fuchsgruber. Both are closely tied to the dubious “GoMoPa” and Berlin lawyer Jochen Resch.
According to the SJB-GoMoPa-victims is Berlin lawyer Jochen Resch the mastermind of the criminal organization “GoMoPa2. The victims state that they have a source inside “GoMoPa” who helped them discover  the shocking truth. The so-called “Deep Throat from Berlin” has information that Resch had the idea to found the criminal organization “GoMoPa” and use non-existing Jewish lawyers  named Goldman, Morgenstern & Partner as camouflage. Their “office” in Madison Avenue, New York, is a mailbox. This is witnessed by a German Ex-Patriot, a lawyer, whose father, Heinz Gerlach, died under strange circumstances.
Resch seems to use “GoMoPa” as an instrument to blackmail parts of the German Property and Investment section.

-”Worse than the Gestapo.” —Simon Wiesenthal, Nazi hunter said about the notorious “Stasi”.

Less than a month after German demonstrators began to tear down the Berlin Wall on November 9, 1989, irate East German citizens stormed the Leipzig district office of the Ministry for State Security (MfS)—the Stasi, as it was more commonly called. Not a shot was fired, and there was no evidence of “street justice” as Stasi officers surrendered meekly and were peacefully led away. The following month, on January 15, hundreds of citizens sacked Stasi headquarters in Berlin. Again there was no bloodshed. The last bit of unfinished business was accomplished on May 31 when the Stasi radioed its agents in West Germany to fold their tents and come home.
The intelligence department of the Nationale Volksarmee (NVA), the People’s Army, had done the same almost a week earlier, but with what its members thought was better style. Instead of sending the five-digit code groups that it had used for decades to message its spies in West Germany, the army group broadcast a male choir singing a children’s ditty about a duck swimming on a lake. There was no doubt that the singing spymasters had been drowning their sorrow over losing the Cold War in schnapps. The giggling, word-slurring songsters repeated the refrain three times: “Dunk your little head in the water and lift your little tail.” This was the signal to agents under deep cover that it was time to come home.
With extraordinary speed and political resolve, the divided nation was reunified a year later. The collapse of the despotic regime was total. It was a euphoric time for Germans, but reunification also produced a new national dilemma. Nazi war crimes were still being tried in West Germany, forty-six years after World War II. Suddenly the German government was faced with demands that the communist officials who had ordered, executed, and abetted crimes against their own people—crimes that were as brutal as those perpetrated by their Nazi predecessors—also be prosecuted.
The people of the former Deutsche Demokratische Republik (DDR), the German Democratic Republic, as the state had called itself for forty years, were clamoring for instant revenge. Their wrath was directed primarily against the country’s communist rulers—the upper echelon of the Sozialistische Einheitspartei (SED), the Socialist Unity Party. The tens of thousands of second-echelon party functionaries who had enriched themselves at the expense of their cocitizens were also prime targets for retribution.
Particularly singled out were the former members of the Stasi, the East German secret police, who previously had considered themselves the “shield and sword” of the party. When the regime collapsed, the Stasi had 102,000 full-time officers and noncommissioned personnel on its rolls, including 11,000 members of the ministry’s own special guards regiment. Between 1950 and 1989, a total of 274,000 persons served in the Stasi.
The people’s ire was running equally strong against the regular Stasi informers, the inoffizielle Mitarbeiter (IMs). By 1995, 174,000 had been identified as IMs, or 2.5 percent of the total population between the ages of 18 and 60. Researchers were aghast when they found that about 10,000 IMs, or roughly 6 percent of the total, had not yet reached the age of 18. Since many records were destroyed, the exact number of IMs probably will never be determined; but 500,000 was cited as a realistic figure. Former Colonel Rainer Wiegand, who served in the Stasi counterintelligence directorate, estimated that the figure could go as high as 2 million, if occasional stool pigeons were included.
“The Stasi was much, much worse than the Gestapo, if you consider only the oppression of its own people,” according to Simon Wiesenthal of Vienna, Austria, who has been hunting Nazi criminals for half a century. “The Gestapo had 40,000 officials watching a country of 80 million, while the Stasi employed 102,000 to control only 17 million.” One might add that the Nazi terror lasted only twelve years, whereas the Stasi had four decades in which to perfect its machinery of oppression, espionage, and international terrorism and subversion.
To ensure that the people would become and remain submissive, East German communist leaders saturated their realm with more spies than had any other totalitarian government in recent history. The Soviet Union’s KGB employed about 480,000 full-time agents to oversee a nation of 280 million, which means there was one agent per 5,830 citizens. Using Wiesenthal’s figures for the Nazi Gestapo, there was one officer for 2,000 people. The ratio for the Stasi was one secret policeman per 166 East Germans. When the regular informers are added, these ratios become much higher: In the Stasi’s case, there would have been at least one spy watching every 66 citizens! When one adds in the estimated numbers of part-time snoops, the result is nothing short of monstrous: one informer per 6.5 citizens. It would not have been unreasonable to assume that at least one Stasi informer was present in any party of ten or twelve dinner guests.

THE STASI OCTOPUS

Like a giant octopus, the Stasi’s tentacles probed every aspect of life. Full-time officers were posted to all major industrial plants. Without exception, one tenant in every apartment building was designated as a watchdog reporting to an area representative of the Volkspolizei (Vopo), the People’s Police. In turn, the police officer was the Stasi’s man. If a relative or friend came to stay overnight, it was reported. Schools, universities, and hospitals were infiltrated from top to bottom. German academe was shocked to learn that Heinrich Fink, professor of theology and vice chancellor at East Berlin’s Humboldt University, had been a Stasi informer since 1968. After Fink’s Stasi connections came to light, he was summarily fired. Doctors, lawyers, journalists, writers, actors, and sports figures were co-opted by Stasi officers, as were waiters and hotel personnel. Tapping about 100,000 telephone lines in West Germany and West Berlin around the clock was the job of 2,000 officers.
Stasi officers knew no limits and had no shame when it came to “protecting the party and the state.” Churchmen, including high officials of both Protestant and Catholic denominations, were recruited en masse as secret informers. Their offices and confessionals were infested with eavesdropping devices. Even the director of Leipzig’s famous Thomas Church choir, Hans-Joachim Rotch, was forced to resign when he was unmasked as a Spitzel, the people’s pejorative for a Stasi informant.
Absolutely nothing was sacred to the secret police. Tiny holes were bored in apartment and hotel room walls through which Stasi agents filmed their “suspects” with special video cameras. Even bathrooms were penetrated by the communist voyeurs.8 Like the Nazi Gestapo, the Stasi was the sinister side of deutsche Gründlichkeit (German thoroughness).
After the Berlin wall came down, the victims of the DDR regime demanded immediate retribution. Ironically, their demands were countered by their fellow Germans in the West who, living in freedom, had diligently built einen demokratischen Rechtsstaat, a democratic state governed by the rule of law. The challenge of protecting the rights of both the victims and the accused was immense, given the emotions surrounding the issue. Government leaders and democratic politicians recognized that there could be no “quick fix” of communist injustices without jeopardizing the entire system of democratic jurisprudence. Moving too rapidly merely to satisfy the popular thirst for revenge might well have resulted in acquittals or mistrials. Intricate jurisdictional questions needed to be resolved with both alacrity and meticulousness. No German government could afford to allow a perpetrator to go free because of a judicial error. The political fallout from any such occurrence, especially in the East, could prove fatal to whatever political party occupied the chancellor’s office in Bonn at the time.
Politicians and legal scholars of the “old federal states,” or West Germany, counseled patience, pointing out that even the prosecution of Nazi criminals had not yet been completed. Before unification, Germans would speak of Vergangenheitsbewältigung (“coming to grips with the past”) when they discussed dealing with Nazi crimes. In the reunited Germany, this word came to imply the communist past as well. The two were considered comparable especially in the area of human rights violations. Dealing with major Nazi crimes, however, was far less complicated for the Germans: Adolf Hitler and his Gestapo and Schutzstaffel (SS) chief, Heinrich Himmler, killed themselves, as did Luftwaffe chief and Vice Chancellor Hermann Göring, who also had been the first chief of the Gestapo. The victorious Allies prosecuted the rest of the top leadership at the International War Crimes Tribunal in Nürnberg. Twelve were hanged, three received life terms, four were sentenced to lesser terms of imprisonment (up to twenty years), and three were acquitted.
The cases of communist judges and prosecutors accused of Rechtsbeugung (perversion of justice) are more problematic. According to Franco Werkenthin, a Berlin legal expert charged with analyzing communist crimes for the German parliament, those sitting in judgment of many of the accused face a difficult task because of the general failure of German justice after World War II. Not a single judge or prosecutor who served the Nazi regime was brought to account for having perverted justice—even those who had handed down death sentences for infringements that in a democracy would have been considered relatively minor offenses. Werkenthin called this phenomenon die Jauche der Justiz, the cesspool of justice.
Of course, the crimes committed by the communists were not nearly as heinous as the Nazis’ extermination of the Jews, or the mass murders in Nazi-occupied territories. However, the communists’ brutal oppression of the nation by means including murder alongside legal execution put the SED leadership on a par with Hitler’s gang. In that sense, Walter Ulbricht or Erich Honecker (Ulbricht’s successor as the party’s secretary-general and head of state) and secret police chief Erich Mielke can justifiably be compared to Hitler and Himmler, respectively.
Arrest warrants were issued for Honecker and Mielke. The Soviet government engineered Honecker’s escape to Moscow, where he became the ward of Soviet President Mikhail S. Gorbachev. When the Soviet Union crumbled, the new Russian President Boris Yeltsin expelled Honecker. He was arrested on his return to Germany, but a court decided against a trial when he was diagnosed with liver cancer. Honecker flew to Chile with his wife Margot to live with their daughter, a Chilean citizen by marriage. His exile was short, and he died in 1994. Mielke was not so fortunate: His KGB friends turned their backs on him. He was tried in Germany for the 1931 murder of two police officers, found guilty, and sentenced to six years in prison. Other charges, including manslaughter, were dismissed because of his advanced age and poor health.
Three other members of the twenty-one-member ruling Politburo also have been tried. Former Defense Minister Heinz Kessler was convicted of manslaughter in connection with the order to kill people who were trying to escape to the West. He received a seven-and-a-half-year term. Two others, members of the Central Committee and the National Defense Council, were tried with Kessler and sentenced to seven and a half years and five years, respectively. Politburo member Harry Tisch, who was also head of the communist trade union, was found guilty of embezzlement and served eighteen months. Six others, including Egon Krenz (Honecker’s successor as party chief), were charged with manslaughter. Krenz was found guilty, and on August 25, 1997, was sentenced to six and a half years in prison.
However, eight years after reunification, many of the 165 members of the Central Committee have not yet been put under investigation. In 1945, Nazis holding comparable or lesser positions were subject to automatic arrest by the Allies. They spent months or even years in camps while their cases were adjudicated. Moreover, the Nürnberg Tribunal branded the Reich and its Corps of Political Leaders, SS, Security Service (SD), Secret State Police (Gestapo), SA (Storm Troopers), and Armed Forces High Command criminal organizations. Similarly sweeping actions against communist leaders and functionaries such as Stasi officers were never contemplated, even though tens of thousands of political trials and human rights abuses have been documented. After the East German regime fell, German judicial authorities scrupulously avoided the appearance of waging witch-hunts or using the law as a weapon of vengeance. Prosecutors and judges made great efforts to be fair, often suspending legal action while requesting rulings from the supreme court on possible constitutional conflicts.
The victims of oppression clamored for revenge and demanded speedy prosecution of the erstwhile tyrants. They had little patience for a judicial system that was handicapped by a lack of unblemished and experienced criminal investigators, prosecutors, and judges. Despite these handicaps, the Berlin Central Police Investigations Group for Government Criminality, mindful that the statute of limitations for most communist crimes would expire at the end of 1999, made significant progress under its director Manfred Kittlaus, the able former director of the West Berlin state police. Kittlaus’s major task in 1998 was to investigate wrongful deaths, including 73 murders, 30 attempted murders, 583 cases of manslaughter, 2,938 instances of attempted manslaughter, and 425 other suspicious deaths. Of the 73 murders, 22 were classified as contract murders.
One of those tried and convicted for attempted contract murder was former Stasi collaborator Peter Haak, who was sentenced to six and a half years in prison. The fifty-two-year-old Haak took part in the Stasi’s 1981 Operation Scorpion, which was designed to pursue people who helped East Germans escape to the West. Proceedings against former General Gerhard Neiber, whose Stasi directorate was responsible for preventing escapes and for wreaking vengeance, were still pending in 1998.
Peter Haak’s murder plot was hatched after he befriended Wolfgang Welsch and his family. Welsch was a thorn in the side of the Stasi because of his success in smuggling people out of the DDR. Haak joined Welsch and the latter’s wife and seven-year-old daughter on a vacation in Israel, where he mixed a gram of thallium, a highly poisonous metallic chemical element used in rat poison, into the hamburgers he was preparing for a meal. Welsch’s wife and daughter vomited immediately after ingesting the poison and recovered quickly. Welsch suffered severe aftereffects, but eventually recovered: He had consumed a large amount of beer with the meal, and an expert testified that the alcohol had probably flushed the poison from his system.
Berlin Prosecutor General Christoph Schäfgen revealed that after the DDR’s demise 15,200 investigations had been launched, of which more than 9,000 were still active at the beginning of 1995. Indictments were handed down in 153 cases, and 73 perpetrators were convicted. Among those convicted were the aforementioned Politburo members as well as a number of border guards who had killed people who were trying to escape to the West.
Despite widespread misgivings about the judicial failures in connection with some Nazi crimes, a number of judges and prosecutors were convicted and jailed for up to three years for perversion of justice. In collusion with the Stasi, they had requested or handed down more severe sentences in political cases so that the state could collect greater amounts when the “convicts” were ransomed by the West German government. {The amount of ransom paid was governed by the time a prisoner had been sentenced to serve.)
The enormity of the task facing judicial authorities in reunified Germany becomes starkly evident when one examines the actions they have taken in all five former East German provinces and in East Berlin. From the end of 1990 to July 1996, 52,050 probes were launched into charges of murder, attempted murder, manslaughter, kidnapping, election fraud, and perversion of justice. A total of 29,557 investigations were halted for various reasons including death, severe illness, old age, or insufficient evidence. In those five and a half years, there were only 139 convictions.
The problem is even more staggering when cases of espionage are included. Between 1990 and 1996, the office of the federal prosecutor general launched 6,641 probes, of which 2,431 were terminated before trial—most due to the statute of limitations. Of 175 indictments on charges of espionage, 95 resulted in convictions. In addition to the cases handled at the federal level, the prosecutor general referred 3,926 investigations to state authorities, who terminated 3,344 without trial. State courts conducted 356 trials, resulting in 248 convictions. Because the statute of limitations for espionage is five years, the prosecutor general’s office told me in 1997 it was unlikely that more espionage trials would be conducted.
It is important to emphasize the difference between the statute’s application to so-called government crimes committed in East Germany before the collapse and to crimes, such as espionage, committed in West Germany. The Unification Treaty specifically permits the belated prosecution of individuals who committed acts that were punishable under the East German criminal code and who due to official connivance were not prosecuted earlier. There is no statute of limitations for murder. For most other crimes the limit is five years; however, due to the obstacles created by previous government connivance, the German parliament in 1993 doubled this time limit for prosecution of the more serious crimes. At the same time, the parliament decreed that all cases must be adjudicated by the end of 2002. For less serious offenses, the statute would have run out on December 31, 1997, but the parliament extended it to 2000.
A number of politicians, jurists, and liberal journalists pleaded for a general amnesty for crimes committed by former DDR leaders and Communist Party functionaries. A former West German supreme court judge, Ernst Mahrenholz, said the “sharp sword of justice prevents reconciliation.” Schäfgen, the Berlin prosecutor general, had this answer for the former high court judge and other amnesty advocates:

I cannot agree. We are raising no special, sharp sword against East Germans. We must pursue state-sponsored injustice in exactly the same manner as we do when a thief steals or when one human being kills another. If one wants to change that, then we would have to do away with the entire criminal justice system, because punishment always hurts. We are not criminalizing an entire people but only an ever shrinking, small portion.

German Foreign Minister Klaus Kinkel, who was West Germany’s minister of justice when the nation was unified, said this at a session of parliament in September 1991: “We must punish the perpetrators. This is not a matter of a victor’s justice. We owe it to the ideal of justice and to the victims. All of those who ordered injustices and those who executed the orders must be punished; the top men of the SED as well as the ones who shot [people] at the wall.” Aware that the feelings against communists were running high among their victims, Kinkel pointed to past revolutions after which the representatives of the old system were collectively liquidated. In the same speech before parliament, he said:

Such methods are alien to a state ruled by law. Violence and vengeance are incompatible with the law in any case. At the same time, we cannot tolerate that the problems are swept under the rug as a way of dealing with a horrible past, because the results will later be disastrous for society. We Germans know from our own experience where this leads. Jewish philosophy formulates it in this way: “The secret of redemption is called remembering.”

Defense attorneys for communist officials have maintained that the difficulty lies in the fact that hundreds of thousands of political opponents were tried under laws of the DDR. Although these laws were designed to smother political dissent and grossly violated basic human rights and democratic norms, they were nonetheless laws promulgated by a sovereign state. How could one justly try individual Stasi officers, prosecutors, and judges who had simply been fulfilling their legal responsibility to pursue and punish violators of the law?
Opinions varied widely on whether and how the Stasi and other perpetrators of state-sponsored crimes should be tried. Did the laws of the DDR, as they existed before reunification, still apply in the east? Or was the criminal code of the western part of the country the proper instrument of justice in reunified Germany? However, these questions were moot: As Rupert Scholz, professor of law at the University of Munich and a Christian Democratic member of parliament, pointed out, the Unification Treaty specifies that the penal code of the DDR and not that of the Federal Republic of Germany (FRG) shall be applied to offenses committed in East Germany. Scholz’s view was upheld by the Bundesverfassungsgericht, the supreme court. Most offenses committed by party functionaries and Stasi officers—murder, kidnapping, torture, illegal wiretapping, mail robbery, and fraud—were subject to prosecution in reunified Germany under the DDR’s penal code. But this would not satisfy the tens of thousands of citizens who had been sent to prison under East German laws covering purely political offenses for which there was no West German equivalent.
Nevertheless, said Scholz, judicial authorities were by no means hamstrung, because West Germany had never recognized the East German state according to international law. “We have always said that we are one nation; that the division of Germany led neither to full recognition under international law nor, concomitantly, to a recognition of the legal system of the DDR,” Scholz said. Accordingly, West German courts have consistently maintained that West German law protects all Germans equally, including those living in the East. Therefore, no matter where the crimes were committed, whether in the East or the West, all Germans have always been subject to West German laws. Applying this logic, East German border guards who had either killed or wounded persons trying to escape to the West could be tried under the jurisdiction of West Germany.
The “one nation” principle was not upheld by the German supreme court. Prior to the court’s decision, however, Colonel General Markus Wolf, chief of the Stasi’s foreign espionage directorate, and some of his officers who personally controlled agents from East Berlin had been tried for treason and convicted. Wolf had been sentenced to six years in prison. The supreme court ruling overturned that verdict and those imposed on Wolf’s cohorts, even though they had obtained the most closely held West German secrets and handed them over to the KGB. The maximum penalty for Landesverrat, or treason, is life imprisonment. In vacating Wolf’s sentence, the court said he could not be convicted because he operated only from East German territory and under East German law.
However, Wolf was reindicted on charges of kidnapping and causing bodily harm, crimes also punishable under East German law. The former Stasi three-star general, on March 24, 1955, had approved in writing a plan to kidnap a woman who worked for the U.S. mission in West Berlin. The woman and her mother were tricked by a Stasi agent whom the woman had been teaching English, and voluntarily got into his car. He drove them into the Soviet sector of the divided city, where they were seized by Stasi officers. The woman was subjected to psychological torture and threatened with imprisonment unless she signed an agreement to spy for the Stasi. She agreed. On her return to the American sector, however, the woman reported the incident to security officials. Wolf had committed a felony punishable by up to fifteen years’ imprisonment in West Germany. He was found guilty in March 1977 and sentenced to two years’ probation.
Those who have challenged the application of the statute of limitations to communist crimes, especially to the executions of citizens fleeing to the West, have drawn parallels to the notorious executive orders of Adolf Hitler. Hitler issued orders mandating the summary execution of Soviet Army political commissars upon their capture and initiating the extermination of Jews. An early postwar judicial decision held that these orders were equivalent to law. When that law was declared illegal and retroactively repealed by the West German Bundestag, the statute of limitations was suspended—that is, it never took effect. Many of those convicted in subsequent trials of carrying out the Führer’s orders were executed by the Allies. The German supreme court has ruled the same way as the Bundestag on the order to shoot people trying to escape to West Germany, making the statute of limitations inapplicable to such cases. The ruling made possible the trial of members of the National Defense Council who took part in formulating or promulgating the order. A number of border guards who had shot would-be escapees also have been tried and convicted.
Chief Prosecutor Heiner Sauer, former head of the West German Central Registration Office for Political Crimes, was particularly concerned with the border shootings. His office, located in Salzgitter, West Germany, was established in 1961 as a direct consequence of the Berlin Wall, which was erected on August 13 of that year. Willy Brandt, at the time the city’s mayor (later federal chancellor) had decided that crimes committed by East German border guards should be recorded. At his behest, a central registry of all shootings and other serious border incidents was instituted. Between August 13, 1961 and the opening of the borders on November 9, 1989, 186 border killings were registered. But when the Stasi archives were opened, investigators found that at least 825 people had paid with their lives for trying to escape to the West. This figure was reported to the court that was trying former members of the National Defense Council. In addition to these border incidents, the registry also had recorded a number of similar political offenses committed in the interior of the DDR: By fall 1991, Sauer’s office had registered 4,444 cases of actual or attempted killings and about 40,000 sentences handed down by DDR courts for “political offenses.”
During the early years of Sauer’s operation, the details of political prosecutions became known only when victims were ransomed by West Germany or were expelled. Between 1963 and 1989, West Germany paid DM5 billion (nearly US$3 billion) to the communist regime for the release of 34,000 political prisoners. The price per head varied according to the importance of the person or the length of the sentence. In some cases the ransom amounted to more than US$56,000. The highest sum ever paid to the East Germans appears to have been DM450,000 (US$264,705 using an exchange rate of US$1.70 to the mark). The ransom “object” in this case was Count Benedikt von Hoensbroech. A student in his early twenties, von Hoensbroech was attending a West Berlin university when the wall went up. He was caught by the Stasi while trying to help people escape and was sentenced to ten years at hard labor. The case attracted international attention because his family was related to Queen Fabiola of Belgium, who interceded with the East Germans. Smelling money, the East German government first demanded the equivalent of more than US$1 million from the young man’s father as ransom. In the end, the parties settled on the figure of DM450,000, of which the West German government paid DM40,000 (about $23,529). Such ransom operations were fully controlled by the Stasi.
Political prisoners released in the DDR could not be registered by the West Germans because their cases remained secret. The victims were admonished to keep quiet or face another prison term. Nonetheless, in the first year after reunification, Sauer’s office added another 20,000 documented cases, for a total of 60,000. Sauer said he believed the final figure of all political prosecutions would be somewhere around 300,000. In every case, the Stasi was involved either in the initial arrest or in pretrial interrogations during which “confessions” were usually extracted by physical or psychological torture, particularly between the mid-1940s and the mid-1960s.
Until 1987, the DDR imposed the death penalty for a number of capital crimes, including murder, espionage, and economic offenses. But after the mid-1950s, nearly all death sentences were kept quiet and executions were carried out in the strictest secrecy, initially by guillotine and in later years by a single pistol shot to the neck. In most instances, the relatives of those killed were not informed either of the sentence or of the execution. The corpses were cremated and the ashes buried secretly, sometimes at construction sites. In reporting about one executioner who shot more than twenty persons to death, the Berlin newspaper Bildzeitung said that a total of 170 civilians had been executed in East Germany. However, Franco Werkenthin, the Berlin official investigating DDR crimes, said he had documented at least three hundred executions. He declined to say how many were for political offenses, because he had not yet submitted his report to parliament. “But it was substantial,” he told me. The true number of executions may never be known because no complete record of death sentences meted out by civil courts could be found. Other death sentences were handed down by military courts, and many records of those are also missing. In addition, German historian Günther Buch believes that about two hundred members of the Stasi itself were executed for various crimes, including attempts to escape to the West.

SAFEGUARDING HUMAN DIGNITY?

The preamble to the East German criminal code stated that the purpose of the code was to “safeguard the dignity of humankind, its freedom and rights under the aegis of the criminal code of the socialist state,” and that “a person can be prosecuted under the criminal code only in strictest concurrence with the law.” However, many of the codified offenses for which East German citizens were prosecuted and imprisoned were unique to totalitarian regimes, both fascist and communist.
Moreover, certain sections of the code, such as those on “Treasonable Relaying of Information” and “Treasonable Agent Activity,” were perversely applied, landing countless East Germans in maximum security penitentiaries. The victims of this perversion of justice usually were persons who had requested legal exit permits from the DDR authorities and had been turned down. In many cases, their “crime” was having contacted a Western consulate to inquire about immigration procedures. Sentences of up to two and a half years’ hard labor were not unusual as punishment for such inquiries.
Engaging in “propaganda hostile to the state” was another punishable offense. In one such case, a young man was arrested and prosecuted for saying that it was not necessary to station tanks at the border and for referring to border fortifications as “nonsense.” During his trial, he “admitted” to owning a television set on which he watched West German programs and later told friends what he saw. One of those “friends” had denounced him to the Stasi. The judge considered the accused’s actions especially egregious and sentenced him to a year and a half at hard labor.
Ironically, another part of this section of the criminal code decreed that “glorifying militarism” also was a punishable offense, although the DDR itself “glorified” its People’s Army beyond any Western norm. That army was clad in uniforms and insignia identical to those of the Nazi Wehrmacht, albeit without eagles and swastikas. The helmets, too, were differently shaped, but the Prussian goose step was regulation during parades.
A nineteen-year-old who had placed a sign in an apartment window reading “When justice is turned into injustice, resistance becomes an obligation!” was rewarded with twenty-two months in the penitentiary. Earlier, the youth had applied for an exit visa and had been turned down. A thirty-four-year-old father of two who also had been denied permission to leave the “workers’ and peasants’ state” with his family similarly advertised that fact with a poster reading “We want to leave, but they won’t let us.” The man went to prison for sixteen months. The “crimes” of both men were covered by a law on “Interference in Activities of the State or Society.”
Two letters—one to a friend in West Germany, seeking assistance to legally emigrate to the West, and another containing a similar appeal to Chief of State Honecker—brought a four-year sentence to their writer, who was convicted under two laws: those on “establishing illegal contacts” (writing to his friend) and on “public denigration” (writing to Honecker). The Stasi had illegally intercepted both letters.
The East German party chiefs were not content to rely only on the Stasi’s millions of informers to ferret out antistate sentiments. Leaving nothing to chance, they created a law that made the failure to denounce fellow citizens a crime punishable by up to five years’ imprisonment. One man was sentenced to twenty-three months for failing to report that a friend of his was preparing to escape to the West. The mandatory denunciation law had its roots in the statutes of the Socialist Unity Party, which were published in the form of a little red booklet. I picked up a copy of this booklet that had been discarded by its previous owner, a Stasi chauffeur, who had written “Ha, Ha” next to the mandate to “report any misdeeds, regardless of the person responsible, to leading party organs, all the way up to the Central Committee.”
Rupert Scholz, member of parliament and professor of law at the University of Munich, said many East Germans feel there is little determination among their Western brethren to bring the Stasi criminals to trial. “In fact, we already have heard many of them say that the peaceful revolution should have been a bloody one instead so they could have done away with their tormentors by hanging them posthaste,” Scholz told me.
The Reverend Joachim Gauck, minister to a Lutheran parish in East Germany, shared the people’s pessimism that justice would be done. Following reunification, Gauck was appointed by the Bonn government as its special representative for safeguarding and maintaining the Stasi archives. “We must at least establish a legal basis for finding the culprits in our files,” Gauck told me. “But it will not be easy. If you stood the millions of files upright in one line, they would stretch for 202 kilometers [about 121 miles]. In those files you can find an unbelievable number of Stasi victims and their tormentors.”
Gauck was given the mandate he needed in November 1991, when the German parliament passed a law authorizing file searches to uncover Stasi perpetrators and their informants. He viewed this legislation as first step in the right direction. With the evidence from Stasi files, the perpetrators could be removed from their public service jobs without any formal legal proceedings. Said Gauck: “We needed this law badly. It is not reasonable that persons who served this apparatus of oppression remain in positions of trust. We need to win our people over to accepting that they are now free and governed by the rule of law. To achieve that, we must build up their confidence and trust in the public service.”
Searching the roughly six million files will take years. A significant number of the dossiers are located in repositories of the Stasi regional offices, sprinkled throughout eastern Germany. To put the files at the Berlin central repository in archival order would take one person 128 years. The job might have been made easier had the last DDR government not ordered the burning of thousands of Stasi computer tapes, ostensibly to forestall a witch-hunt. Thousands of files dealing with espionage were shredded and packed into 17,200 paper sacks. These were discovered when the Stasi headquarters was stormed on January 15, 1990. The contents of all of these bags now have been inspected. It took two workers between six and eight weeks to go through one bag. Then began the work of the puzzlers, putting the shredded pieces together. By the middle of 1997, fewer than 500 bags of shredded papers had been reconstructed—into about 200,000 pages. Further complicating matters was the lack of trained archivists and experts capable of organizing these files—to say nothing of the 37.5 million index cards bearing the names of informers as well as persons under Stasi surveillance—and interpreting their contents. Initially, funding for a staff of about 550 individuals was planned, at a total of about DM24.5 million annually (about US$15 million using an exchange rate of US$1.60). By 1997, the budget had grown to US$137 million and the staff to 3,100.
Stasi victims and citizens who had been under surveillance were allowed to examine their Stasi files. Within four years of reunification, about 860,000 persons had asked to inspect their case files, with 17,626 of those requests being received in December 1994 alone. By 1997, 3.4 million people had asked to see their files. Countless civil suits were launched when victims found the names of those who had denounced and betrayed them, and many family relationships and friendships were destroyed.
The rehabilitation of Stasi victims and financial restitution to them was well under way; but Gauck believed that criminal prosecution of the perpetrators would continue to be extremely difficult. “We can already see that leading SED functionaries who bear responsibility for the inhumane policies, for which they should be tried, are instead accused of lesser offenses such as corruption. It is actually an insult to democracy that a man like Harry Tisch is tried for embezzlement and not for being a member of the Politburo, where the criminal policies originated.”
The “Stasi files law,” as it is popularly known, also made it possible to vet parliamentarians for Stasi connections. Hundreds were fired or resigned—and a few committed suicide—when it was discovered that they had been Stasi informants. Among those who resigned was Lothar de Maiziere, the last premier of the DDR, who signed the unification agreement with West German Chancellor Helmut Kohl. He was a member of the East German version of the Christian Democratic Union, which like all noncommunist parties in the Eastern bloc had been totally co-opted by the regime. After reunification, he moved into parliament and was awarded the vice chairmanship of Kohl’s Christian Democratic Union. A lawyer, De Maiziere had functioned for years as an IM, an informer, under the cover name Cerny. De Maiziere at first denied he was Cerny, but the evidence was overwhelming. It was De Maiziere’s government that had ordered the destruction of the Stasi computer tapes.

THE COMMUNISTS’ POLITICAL SURVIVAL

De Maiziere, who had been a driving force behind prompt reunification, soon passed into oblivion; but twenty members of the old Communist Party, the SED, are still members of parliament. The SED changed its name in late 1989, when the DDR was collapsing, to the Party of Democratic Socialism (PDS). Its new leadership arrogantly dismissed their bloody past as irrelevant now that the word democratic had been adopted as part of their party’s name. If the elections of summer 1990 had taken place just a few months later and thus had been conducted under the law of reunified Germany, these individuals would not have won parliamentary seats. The West German electoral rules governing the proportional representation system require that a party garner at least 5 percent of the vote before it may enter parliament. In addition to choosing a party, voters cast a second ballot for a specific person. This is called a direct mandate. If any party falls below 5 percent but gets at least three direct mandates, that party is seated in parliament. As a one-time compromise in consideration of East Germany’s smaller population, the Bonn government accepted a 3-percent margin of party votes. Even so, the PDS barely made it into parliament.
In the 1994 general election, the first after reunification, the party polled 4.4 percent. Had it not been for the votes electing four persons by direct mandate, the PDS would have been excluded. The direct mandates all came from East Berlin districts heavily populated by unemployed, former Communist Party and government officials. One of the men elected directly was Gregor Gysi, a communist lawyer who had been accused of informing on his clients to the Stasi. Gysi denied the allegations and had obtained a temporary injunction barring a former East German dissident from making the assertion. However, a Hamburg court lifted the injunction in December 1994 on the basis of Stasi documents that indicated Gysi had no case.
Another candidate directly elected to parliament was Stefan Heym, a German-born writer who had emigrated to the United States after Hitler came to power, had changed his name from Helmut Flieg, and had become a U.S. citizen. He served in the U.S. Army as an officer during World War II, but switched sides in 1952 to live in East Germany, forfeiting his U.S. citizenship in order to become an East German citizen and a member of the Communist Party. A year later, on June 17, 1953, the East German people rose up in a revolt that was crushed by the Red Army. Had it not been for the intervention of the Soviets, Heym wrote afterward in the communist daily newspaper Berliner Zeitung, “the American bombing would have already begun. The shots against the rebels were fired to prevent war, rather than to begin one.” And when Stalin died, just four months earlier, Heym used the same newspaper to mourn the butcher of an estimated twenty million people as the “most loved man of our times.” Finally, in a speech on January 31, 1995, at a demonstration marking the 62nd anniversary of the Nazi takeover, the unrepentant Heym, now eighty-two years old, had the gall to say that the present climate in Germany was “very similar to that in 1933, and this frightens me.” It was a grotesque spectacle when Heym was accorded the “honor” of delivering the opening address of the 1965 parliamentary session traditionally reserved for the body’s oldest member. Despite vehement protests, parliamentary president Rita Süssmuth ruled to uphold the tradition.
One of the PDS members also retaining his seat was Hans Modrow. Modrow, a veteran communist, was SED district secretary in Dresden. It was a most powerful communal political position. Modrow was a vital cog in the apparatus of state repression. The local Stasi chief, Major General Horst Böhm, reported directly to him. Modrow was the one who ordered the Vopo, the People’s Police, to resort to violence in putting down massive protests during the turbulent days in fall 1989, just before the Berlin Wall fell. Hundreds of protesters were severely beaten and jailed. Böhm, the Dresden Stasi boss, was found shot dead in his office in early 1990, just before he was to appear before a commission that had been convened to settle the future of the communist state. His death was listed as a suicide. However, an unsubstantiated rumor has it that he was murdered to prevent him from testifying about Modrow’s despotic rule. Modrow was found guilty of election fraud in May 1993. The DDR hierarchy, according to the evidence, had ordered that the number of votes opposing the official slate in the 1989 election had to be fewer than in 1985. Modrow reported that only 2.5 percent of the ballots in his district were cast in opposition; but the true number was at least four times higher. The judge issued him a mere rebuke, refusing to imprison or fine him. The federal high court, which reviews sentences, ordered in November 1994 that Modrow stand trial again because the sentence “was too mild.” After a new trial in 1996 on charges of perjury, Modrow was sentenced to six months’ probation. A year later, parliament was still considering whether he should be deprived of his seat.
Unlike the Nazi Party’s finances and property, which were confiscated by the victorious Allies and turned over to the first West German government in 1949, the SED’s millions were inherited by the PDS, which spirited part of those funds out of the country when the East German government collapsed. The PDS also became custodian of the archives of the SED and refused anyone outside the party access to them. Shortly after reunification, in 1990, the courts ruled that the archives were state property. Judicial authorities as well as scholars were permitted to research them. Nevertheless, the SED archives were almost lost. In 1994, the German news magazine Focus discovered a letter dated March 1991, sent by Gregor Gysi in the capacity of PDS party chief to Vladimir A. Ivashko, assistant secretary-general of the Soviet Union’s Communist Party. In this letter, Gysi pleaded with Soviet leaders either to put pressure on German Chancellor Helmut Kohl to return the archive to the PDS, or if Kohl felt this was politically impossible, to destroy it. The opening of the archive, Gysi wrote, was a “genuine catastrophe,” because it contained many secret documents. Publication of the documents would have “extremely unpleasant results not only for the PDS but for the Communist Party of the Soviet Union as well,” Gysi wrote. But his Soviet friends were no longer able to help him. The archive holds documents on Politburo decisions and directives that might prove crucial in prosecuting the former East German party hierarchy. In the end, the PDS offered to settle for 20 percent of the SED’s ill-gotten funds, forfeiting the rest as a gesture of goodwill toward the new state.
Not all observers were impressed by this compromise. Peter Gauweiler, Bavaria’s minister for development and ecological affairs at the time of reunification, and a member of the Christian Democratic Party, demanded that the PDS and the Deutsche Kommunistische Partei (DKP, the West German Communist Party), be outlawed: “Every month we learn of new crimes committed by the SED—terrible things, gruesome things,” Gauweiler said. “We cannot tolerate a successor organization to such an extremely criminal gang.”

For more Information the victims have launched a new site: http://www.victims-opfer.com

Reporting by Anthony Solomon, Bridget Gallagher; Editing by Magister Bernd Pulch* and Kim Halburton

For security reasons we do not provide any more information to protect us against cyber criminals – join our Crusade against Cyber Criminals

The INVESTMENT – MAGAZINE – THE ORIGINAL- was founded in 1995. We publish three editions, one global, one for Asia and one germany, Austria and Szwiterland.

We are independent from financial companies.

We focus on HNWI.

A high net worth individual (HNWI) is a person with a high net worth. In the private banking business, these individuals typically are defined as having investable assets (financial assets not including primary residence) in excess of US$1 million.[1][2] As explained below, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission has promulgated a different definition of “high net worth individual” for regulatory purposes.

The Merrill Lynch – Capgemini World’s Wealth Report 2009 defines HNWIs as those who hold at least US$1 million in financial assets and Ultra-HNWIs as those who hold at least US$30 million in financial assets, with both excluding collectibles, consumables, consumer durables and primary residences. The report states that in 2008 there were 8.6 million HNWIs worldwide, a decline of 14.9% from 2007. The total HNWI wealth worldwide totaled US$32.8 trillion, a 19.5% decrease from 2007. The Ultra-HNWIs experienced the greater loss, losing 24.6% in population size and 23.9% in accumulated wealth. The report revised its 2007 projections that HNWI financial wealth would reach US$59.1 trillion by 2012 and revised this downward to a 2013 HNWI wealth valued at $48.5 trillion advancing at an annual rate of 8.1%.

WATCH OUR OWN 560 CHANNELS and 5.000 ASSOCIATED CHANNELS TOTALLY FREE

ebizz.tv is a new, free and open-source platform for internet television and video with more as 5 million videos in the library. According to Nielsen Netrating the network has more than 28 million unique users a month.An intuitive interface lets users subscribe to channels, watch video, and build a video library. Our publishing software lets you broadcast full-screen video to thousands of people at virtually no cost.

We offer content owners of all sizes to launch their own commercial Internet video channels and generate revenue through advertising and video download sales

We broadcast and produce
IPTV channels all around the globe.

WE BUILD YOUR PERSONAL WEB TV CHANNEL

Copyright General Global Media

*Magister Bernd M. Pulch (MA – Magister Artium)

Magister Bernd M. Pulch studied Publizistik (2), Komparatistik (1) and Germanistik (1-2) until 1988

University Mainz

Published his Magister-Thesis for Professor Hans-Mathias  Kepplinger

about Dolf Zillmans “Emotional Arousal Theory”  January 1987

You can order the book for only € 125,- It can be delivered in 7 days.

Payment must be made in advance.

🤡🤡🤡😂Pop Stasi proudly presents Loosing Peter “Joker” Ehlers :”Bling – Bang – Bang – Born” – AI Parody✌️

Investment Magazin, Investment, Das Investment, Investment Magazine
(Today, persona non grata in the German banking industry); – Peter Reski (responsible for Finance, known for fraud, tax fraud and embezzlement, which is already behind the judgments are final) – Mark Vornkahl (responsible for organizational and administrative tasks in GOMOPA, a former police officer dismissed because of numerous expectations in the service, already has a few final judgments “on his account”); – Claus i Ulrike Wottle (married couple, for the so-called “unconventional” enforcement of the debt for the benefit GOMOPA. This execution was imposing, with extortion violence based on both real and fictitious debts references? How does the system of GOMOPADie above-mentioned persons in Brief, as well as with the service GOMOPA cooperating, so-called “experts GOMOPA” Bloggers and all other professional and legal persons choose from all possible sources of information about large, rich companies and corporations coming in various domestic and international sectors of the economy. GOMOPA The service is particularly keen that those aussucht, the “in itself visible.” Those companies corporations and, therefore, against the relatively easy and without much effort himself, inconsistencies, etc. can be done in terms of the even crimes such as cheating and Erschwindeln Others can easily perform. It is well known that every company especially good at their presence and her name is inviolable. Each company will do everything according to their good presence also retain its credibility to be. But if the victim of GOMOPA and his “partner” and a large range of businesses, so it is possible to call such companies a quick, easy, and even considerably enriched. It appears at this point the question: Which clever criminals in the network and outside the network to me is success, it does not wish to benefit? The criminals in the network know that without business credibility there is no confidence that any business is essential. GOMOPA and all are cooperating with the security of all possible methods and measures mastered how to credibility and confidence of a company, a company, corporation (crime victims) in question. This moves just the attention of the user, so that the homepage of the GOMOPA http://www.gomopa.net in search engines like Google, Yahoo is easy to find. This, in turn, means nothing other than additional profits for the service GOMOPA because of its activity around a media discourse created wird.Ein at first glance commonplace and easy victims of extortion, for example, can a public governmental body, which, based on the credibility of public works, such as a bank or a foreign bank financial institution. So it was with the foreign banks, international financial institution Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. the case. A simple and easy victims of illicit profits and material may include insurance companies, where – as it is from our search results, much to the criminal activities of the GOMOPA especially in the area of the Federal Republic of Germany, Switzerland and Austria was due. Among the known and identifiable victims is certainly German, Austrian and Swiss banks, insurance companies such as Allianz of Germany, German and Austrian companies such as HDI and DKV visible. This is what the service GOMOPA trust and what with the cooperating services, blogs nowadays practice is the so-called cyber-stalking, which rapidly spread in the network. The method is criminal at this point and others in the threat that the business of an enterprise (Ofer blackmail, threats and forcible ) fictitious, even non-existent information (lies, rumors, stories, statements, insults) on the net first then in other mass media. This is only used to a potential victim to move a considerable sum of money for the so-called “peace “the blackmailer available. The” quiet “here means the promise of access lock with respect to the fictitious publication of any information on the net and in all other mass media, the victims of extortion in extremely negative light showing. Such threats are, as already above the goal of companies – potential victims of cyber-stalking to do likewise, that they themselves “buy.” In short, GOMOPA and his peers, and cooperating with those services, and blogs, create a “virtual reality”, or otherwise said publishing fictitious information on potential victims of a crime. firms and corporations, against which threats and extortion by GOMOPA are not due, ie those who for so-called “peace” does not want to pay, to be victims of serious lies, insults, and Insinuationen other criminal misappropriations, the appearance and presence of a firm with certainty. One is a target of GOMOPA, namely as fast and as easy as it goes, money abzukassieren, and if a company refuses, and the “peace” do not buy wishes, it is unexpectedly and quickly become an object of extortion and defamation on the net. At this point the following question arises: How is it possible that the leader of the firm GOMOPA, Mr Klaus Mauri chat, only in the Federal Republic of Germany on his account “23 court rulings, has for many years as an honest citizen to create, while other persons, firms, corporations criminal acts, offenses memorize, in addition to substantial sums of money could earn? This complex process can only be explained as follows: GOMOPA creates his appearance, his presence in the eyes of public opinion as an honest subject, against which pathological phenomena in the public and economic life einschreitet. GOMOPA and his partner (services, blogs) present themselves as followers of any Verbrechensart that promise so the fight against criminals in each virtual network ( especially against any cheaters, blackmailers). GOMOPA used in this respect a kind of “Merketingsvorhang” as a method of seduction, a result which is his true “face” and his true intentions than that of a fraudster and blackmail on money can hide. The true intentions of the GOMOPA, of working together GOMOPA Services and blogs were until today no doubt with success before the public opinion will remain hidden, especially thanks to the so-called “smoke curtain”, which reflects the fact that man himself as a “winner” of any abuse and any pathological appearance of the public and economic life in Aland German, Austria, Switzerland, the United States, Britain, Russia, Spain created. Next appears the GOMOPA forward by the person on which companies and corporations – the future victims of the crime that is – against the possibility of the release of extremely poor and the company concerned in a negative light visual information on the Internet and other mass media warns. The person from whom the speech is also informed that they are successful against such a procedure for a “fee” can be used. The GOMOPA is at this point up to the extortion of money for so-called “peace” to the company and corporation (the victim of a crime) around. Most of the companies concerned to such threats did not respond, because it’s everyday life and their agenda. It finally barely missing on the web of blackmail and outside of the medium. Normally so seldom so-called “understanding”, while on the one hand, the crime victim, on the other hand, the GOMOPA occurs. It is understandable that the price for such an “understanding” means the provision of the requested funds would GOMOPA. The financial blackmail in this stage is rarely enforced. The situation changes little, however, if the firms and corporations (crime victims) find that the threat was fulfilled. In Brief will appear on the homepage http://www.gomopa.net numerous newspaper articles, reports and bogus pseudo market analysis, both by GOMOPA as well as so-called “independent experts” and the company will be represented, with formal or fictitious GOMOPA together. Information published here, correspond to the contents of a threat and make the operations of firms and corporations in an extremely negative light dar. There is no doubt that such actions and methods only to harm the good name and good presence of these firms and corporations prerogatives. The activity of GOMOPA is certainly not exhausted. GOMOPA disseminated (published accommodates) the above information in the network by the credible, and popular opinion-operated services. Moreover, GOMOPA threatens the companies and corporations (its victims), that “from the finger-drawn” information not only on the network, but also on television and on radio and in the press landscape erscheinen.Wie the experience and expertise of the former Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. show that the services are usually not aware that they are for the purpose of a criminal action by the GOMOPA used. They agree with the corresponding fictitious publications, reports and analysis on what specifically GOMOPA through and through “independent” experts are prepared. It also states that the services, and blogs such cooperation with the GOMOPA approval, although they know that the information transmitted by GOMOPA are fictitious and the credibility of companies and corporations affect. They take so aware of the criminal procedure part. The explanation of this situation is quite simple. GOMOPA pays namely the services, and blogs related remuneration that the publication of false information on the companies and corporations (crime victims) agree. Some services, and blogs seem to know nothing about it to have that on their pages available information “fictitious” and “pulled out of the fingers are. Are you looking for in this way their conduct to justify, because they want the legal consequences of participating in the abuse of the good name and appearance of a company or corporation to escape. The activity system of GOMOPA of collaborating services and blogs was also the example of Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. tested. Beginning in October 2008 was one of the workers of Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. a message from an anonymous sender, in the near future – first on the Internet, then on television, radio and in the German press – information published by the functioning and activities of Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. in an extremely negative light show. The employee of Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. was then informed that these reports / news undoubtedly significantly the appearance and the reputation of the firm Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. affect. The place mentioned in this “conversation partner” has the workers of Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. informed that the possibility of the embarrassing situation to be avoided by Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. to the person shown by the account the sum of 100,000.00 EUR transfers. As later revealed, however, was Mr. Klaus Mauri Chat – this anonymous interlocutor – “brain” and “Leader of the GOMOPA”. The investigations have been employed by the Federal Judicial Police (tracking and identifying the body at the federal level) during the investigation for the payment of blackmail, fraud and threats because of what Mr Mauri chatting and his staff were practiced, and for participation by other (head of Internet services and moderators of blogs) on this process. These crimes have been committed to loss of many professional and judicial persons, including the Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. The victims of this crime in Germany, Austria, Switzerland, Spain, Portugal, Great Britain, the USA and Canada visible. At this moment appeared the following question: What was the reaction of Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. to the demands from GOMOPA? Corresponded to the response to the expectations of GOMOPA? Has the Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. the required sum of EUR 100,000.00 paid? Side of Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. There was absolutely no reaction to the extortion attempt by GOMOPA. At the end of August 2008 on the Service http://www.gompa.net numerous articles / reports published by the activities of Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. in a very negative light have represented. Once the information contained on http://www.gomopa.net detail and were fully analyzed, it is that they are not even the truth at one point and potential and existing customers of Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. in relation to the financial institution from this discontinued business activities is misleading. Following the criminal Handlugen of GOMOPA and its cooperating services, and blogs on the network, the Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. measurable and significant business losses. The Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. has primarily an important group of potential customers lost. But what it showed as important, the existing customers of Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. little away. Those customers have used our services and continue to use the still. In view of the existing collaboration with the Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.., Which will in turn be no objections. GOMOPA has such a course of events accurately predicted, which aims significant and measurable business by Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. losses were suffered. The course of events, the service GOMOPA certainly pleased. GOMOPA has to expect that the position of Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. declines and the financial institution, the required sum (100.000,00 EUR) provides. Over time, as the whole procedure in the network was becoming more popular, tried GOMOPA still four times to the Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. Contacts, each time by adjusting these criminal “Kompanie” has promised, although it every time his financial demands heraufsetzte. The last of the set of “company” against Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. ratio was even planned EUR 5,000,000.00 (in words: EURO fünfmilionen). The Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. could but before the ever-increasing demands from the Service GOMOPA claim. In October 2008 met the management of Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. Decision on the notification of the INTERPOL International Police and the appropriate law enforcement institutions of the FRG (the police and the prosecutor) about the existing situation. In the meantime, reported at the Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. numerous companies and corporations, and even professional person such as doctors, judges, priests, actors and other people from different countries of the world, the extortion of GOMOPA relented and the required amounts of money it had. These people already gave statements that they have done so, so they finally just “be in peace” and unnecessary problems, difficulties, and a reasonable conclusion hardly avoid them. The victims of this criminal action, the Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. using different amounts of money which were requested, informed. In one case, there were relatively small (a few thousand EURO), in another case it has to deliver significant amounts (around few million EURO). Additionally turned to Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. Companies which have not yet GOMOPA the “fee” on out and have already considered whether they should do or not. These firms anticipated by Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. a clear opinion as well as a practical professional advice on how to be in such a situation should behave and how they can avoid debt. The Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. has invariably victims of all crimes, which are at our company have made a cooperation proposed. The top task is to this cooperation, jointly determined and effective measures against GOMOPA against other services in the network, and against all Bloggers to meet in the here described with international criminal procedure GOMOPA leaders to participate. All these companies were known as the Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. proposed “crusade” against GOMOPA, his partner. At our request to notify all participating companies the INTERPOL International Police and their pursuit of domestic institutions, including the competent public prosecutor and the police authorities about the existing situation. In view of the fact that the criminal act of GOMOPA be extended over many states and that the number of the Federal Republic of Germany because the ads reimbursed by GOMOPA, Internet Services and Bloggers crimes, grew up fast – which no doubt influenced by a far-reaching impact of criminal of GOMOPA testifies – International Business, the Police INTERPOL Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. before that its representatives in Berlin with representatives from GOMOPA true to the “payment arrangements and transfer the sum of EUR 5,000,000.00 to discuss. This step meant a well thought-out and by the Federal Criminal Police organized the event to carry out aimed at the arrest of international criminals GOMOPA acting was. The coordinated steps and measures of Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. Damaged and others, led by the International Economic Police INTERPOL, the Federal Criminal Police Office and the Prosecutor of the Federal Republic of Germany for education, training and implementation of the above-described case contributed. In November 2008, the event in Berlin prepared for the apprehension and arrest of the representative of the GOMOPA, after the arrest of Mr. Klaus Mauri chat – as the main leaders and leaders of international criminal group GOMOPA recalled. The arrest and notified the Federal Criminal Police showed both the current whereabouts of Mr. Klaus Mauri chat. “Brain” and the founder of this international criminal group GOMOPA, Mr Klaus Mauri chat on the same day was also arrested and imprisoned on time, will soon put in charge state, the responsibility for their own crimes and those of the forum, before a competent GOMOPA Federal wear. The Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. undertook all possible steps to ensure that Mr. Klaus Mauri chatting on the dock of the competent court of the United Kingdom of Great Britain appears. Among the damaged work and justice people from United Kingdom, along with the Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. There are many victims of GOMOPA: The beginning of the arrests with such a scale means for the German judiciary and a major breakthrough point. It is worth noting that the prosecution bodies of the Federal Republic, up to this stage of the long-standing criminal activity of Mr. Klaus Mauri chatting and his staff were powerless. Prolonged impunity of the criminal actions of Mr. Klaus Mauri chat, for years the “first violin” in GOMOPA played, is to end gegangen.An this point another question arises: how is it so go on? The arrest of Mr. Klaus chat Mauri is a critical moment, in other words a “turn around 180 degrees” for him personally. But it also means the beginning of the end “for its employees, for Internet Services, Bloggers, with GOMOPA so happy and had worked together without contradiction. There is no doubt that the cause of Mr Klaus Mauri chat at the top of the “iceberg” is. The above-mentioned turning point on this issue will be further arrests and detentions of members GOMOPA bring with them, and all persons from all areas involved in this transnational criminal actions have taken part. For information (reports by the end of December 2008), which of Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. available, the result that the next arrests currently prepared to be associated with the Services GOMOPA cooperating persons. This is to people outside Germany – from where Mr Klaus Mauri chat coming – refer. The details may be at this point in terms of legal and course of the prosecution bodies of the BRG and the Interpol-led investigation can not be betrayed. The Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. currently can only illustrate information from the investigation led the public to the criminal liability not to have this moment wird.In so intense preparations for the arrest of a number of persons outside the Federal Republic of Germany. This applies particularly to countries such as the following: – Russia-Ukraine – Poland – Spain – Mexico – Portugal – Brazil – the United States of America – Canada – UK – Ireland – Australia – New Zealand – India. All professional and judicial persons, regardless of the country in which they accompany the Office, or its citizens, and until now, consciously or unconsciously with the Forum GOMOPA together, or continue to work together to arouse the suspicion of the INTERPOL International Police. This works with the police criminal investigation department in each country, to the above persons first identify and then to legally pursue them. Information about this topic, as well as on the beginning and end of the activity of the GOMOPA can be at the following addresses on the Web at: http://gomopaabzocker.wordpress.com/http://www.nepper-schlepper-bauernfaenger.comhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qNpzAu-QMuEhttp://www.korte.de/alexander/2006/01/gomopa-finanforum-kritik.html- http://evelux.de/gomopa-sam-240/- http://blog.deobald.org/archive/2007/07/01/betrugsvorwurf-gomopa-spam/ 2. Dubai KLP Group Emirates – United Arab Emirates. As head of the company is Mr Martin Kraeter, not only as the “brain” of the whole company, but also as a longstanding friend of Mr Klaus Mauri Chat (GOMOPA-wire) acts. This company wants to hide and not even officially exist, that they as a strategic partner of the GOMOPA in the area of the Middle East, according to the territory of the Persian coast operates. Official activities of the company KLP Group Emirates includes among others the following areas: financial advisory services from the offshore area (Management Services – Facilitators – OffshoreConsultants, International Tax & Legal Consultants – Fiduciaries). In the sphere of activities of the Company will include the creation of companies and enterprises in the so-called “tax havens” to the tax liability to the company activity entfliehen.Inoffizielle KLP Group Emirates includes cooperation with the Service GOMOPA in the field of “Gelwäsche”. The monies are a result of criminal activity by GOMOPA generated by advanced professional and judicial persons soon throughout the world and legalized. The illegality based on the activity of the company KLP Group Emirates, as well as the cooperation with the Services GOMOPA attracted attention even when the prosecution organs of the United Kingdom of Great Britain, especially in Scotland Yard, which on this issue an intensive investigation has begun, which is in the ” development phase is located. It must be noted that all professional and judicial persons, but especially the clients of the company KLP Group Emirates, with the company KLP Group Emirates have cooperated in the past and still do, under the “Lupp” of Scotland Yard to be .3. Russlanda) The Company E-XECUTIVE by the Lord led Novosartow Vilen. On the homepage of the Company contained information comes directly from the company GOMOPA. The company e XECUTIVE leads the close cooperation not only with GOMOPA, but also with another on the Russian territory under the name of OOO UK broker functioning company. The company e XECUTIVE in connection with the company OOO UK broker is a member of a criminal group led by GOMOPA. The company e XECUTIVE GOMOPA representing interests in Russia and Central-Eastern Europe. Unofficially, the company employs E XECUTIVE-especially with the search for potential “victims” of the Erschwindelns, blackmail and forcing the funds for GOMOPA companies and corporations from the territory of Russia, Ukraine, and from all countries in Central Eastern Europe. Officially, the company e XECUTIVE one to the forum GOMOPA similar industrial activity. b) OOO “UK broker.” Head of the firm is Mr. Pavel Kokarev. This company is not concealed, that they are consistent with the Forum GOMOPA cooperates. The company OOO UK broker represents GOMOPA in Central Eastern Europe, including Russia. You shall be officially transferred to this area the GOMOPA similar activity, but unofficially it is to search for potential “victims” of racketeering, fraud and Erschwindelns for GOMOPA employed. The company has remained until now spared from any punishment, it could with “eternal impunity” because of a poorly developed, corrupt legal system in Russia expected. The situation may change after Mr. Klaus Mauri Chat arrested in Berlin and was arrested. This constant offenders, the “on his account” a set of legally enforceable judgments has, until now his freedom has unlimited recover, the do not know quite what it means to be arrested, begins gradually, according to our available information to finally “to bear witness.” This is understandable when one considers the threat of a penalty he considered. This delinquent shows growing interest in cooperation with the German tracking and identifying bodies. So there is a chance that other people he unveiled to the public by providing for reduction of prison sentence counts. It is also the only question of time INTERPOL, in cooperation with the Russian Service (FSB) of the Company OOO UK broker “at the door knocking”, which by Mr. Pavle Kokarev and represented. The company OOO UK broker has a virtual office in REGUS building in Moscow, is not even a person, forming a typical one-person company, which all business “crimes” may be the name of it, with no civil liability to pay. The Lord Pavel Kokarev seems to have forgotten or do not have sufficient knowledge about its possible responsibility fier to participate in the international crimes under the direction of Gomopa.

For more Information the victims have launched a new site: http://www.victims-opfer.com

Sehr geehrte Leser,

auch wir gehen von dem Drahtzieher Jochen Resch aus, da Klaus Maurischat nicht in der Lage ist englisch zu sprechen und ihm auch sonst alle Fähigkeiten fehlen das Verbrecher-Netzwerk “GoMoPa” zu leiten

Mit freundlichen Grüssen

Administrator

Meridian Capital about GoMoPa

Der Beweis: Erpressungsversuch des „NACHRICHTENDIENSTES“ GoMoPa“ an Meridian Capital Nachfolgend bringen wir einen Artikel von „GoMoPa“, der der Ausgangspunkt der “GoMoPa” Erpressungen war und zur Verhaftung von “GoMoPa”-”CEO” Klaus Dieter Maurischat in Berlin durch das BKA und Interpol war.
„GoMopa“ schreibt:08.09.2008
Weltweite Finanzierungen mit WidersprüchenDie Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. gibt an, weltweite Finanzierungen anbieten zu können und präsentiert sich hierbei auf aufwendig kreierten Webseiten. GOMOPA hat die dort gemachten Angaben analysiert und Widersprüche entdeckt.

Der Firmensitz

Der Firmensitz befindet sich laut eigener Aussage in Dubai, Vereinigte Arabische Emirate. In einem GOMOPA vorliegenden Schreiben der Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. heißt es jedoch, der Firmensitz sei in London. Auf der Homepage des Unternehmens taucht die Geschäftsadresse in der Londoner Old Broad Street nur als „Kundenabteilung für deutschsprachige Kunden“ auf. Eine weitere Adresse in der englischen Hauptstadt, diesmal in der Windsor Avenue, sei die „Abteilung der Zusammenarbeit mit Investoren“.

Die Meridian Capital Enterprises ist tatsächlich als „Limited“ (Ltd.) mit Sitz in England und Wales eingetragen. Aber laut Firmenhomepage hat das Unternehmen seinen „rechtlichen Geschäftssitz“ in Dubai. Eine Abfrage beim Gewerbeamt Dubais (DED) zu dieser Firmierung bleibt ergebnislos.

Bemerkenswert ist auch der vermeintliche Sitz in Israel. Auf der Webseite von Meridian Capital Enterprises heißt es: „Die Firma Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. ist im Register des israelischen Justizministeriums unter der Nummer 514108471, gemäß dem Gesellschaftsrecht von 1999, angemeldet.“ Hierzu Martin Kraeter, Gomopa-Partner und Prinzipal der KLP Group Emirates in Dubai: „Es würde keinem einzigen Emirati – geschweige denn einem Scheich auch nur im Traum einfallen, direkte Geschäfte mit Personen oder Firmen aus Israel zu tätigen. Und schon gar nicht würde er zustimmen, dass sein Konterfei auch noch mit vollem Namen auf der Webseite eines Israelischen Unternehmens prangt.“

Auf der Internetseite sind diverse Fotos mit Scheichs an Konferenztischen zu sehen. Doch diese großen Tagungen und großen Kongresse der Meridian Capital Enterprises werden in den Pressearchiven der lokalen Presse Dubais mit keinem Wort erwähnt.
Martin Kraeter: „ Ein ‚britisch-arabisch-israelisches bankfremdes Finanzinstitut sein zu wollen, wie die Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. es darstellt, ist mehr als zweifelhaft. So etwas gibt es schlicht und ergreifend nicht! Der Nahostkonflikt schwelt schon seit mehr als 50 Jahren. Hier in den Vereinigten Arabischen Emiraten (VAE) werden Israelis erst gar nicht ins Land gelassen. Israelische Produkte sind gebannt. Es gibt nicht einmal direkte Telefonverbindungen. Die VAE haben fast 70% der Wiederaufbaukosten des Libanon geschultert, nachdem Israel dort einmarschiert ist.“

Zwei angebliche Großinvestitionen der Meridian Capital Enterprises in Dubai sind Investmentruinen bzw. erst gar nicht realisierte Projekte. Das Unternehmen wirbt mit ihrer finanziellen Beteiligung an dem Dubai Hydropolis Hotel und dem Dubai Snowdome.

Der Aktivitätsstatus der Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. ist laut englischen Handelsregister (UK Companies House) „dormant“ gemeldet. Auf der Grundlage des englischen Gesellschaftsrechts können sich eingetragene Unternehmen selbst „dormant“ (schlafend) melden, wenn sie keine oder nur unwesentliche buchhalterisch zu erfassende Transaktionen vorgenommen haben. Dies ist angesichts der angeblichen globalen Investitionstätigkeit der Meridian Capital Ltd. sehr erstaunlich.

Der Webauftritt

Die Internetseite der MCE ist sehr aufwendig gestaltet, die Investitionen angeblich in Millionen- und Milliardenhöhe. Bei näherer Betrachtung der Präsentationselemente fällt jedoch auf, dass es sich bei zahlreichen veröffentlichen Fotos, die Veranstaltungen der Meridian Capital Enterprises dokumentieren sollen, meist um Fotos von Online-Zeitungen oder frei zugänglichen Medienfotos einzelner Institutionen handelt wie z.B. der Börse Dubai.

Auf der Internetpräsenz befinden sich Videofilmchen, die eine frappierende Ähnlichkeit mit dem Werbematerial von NAKHEEL aufweisen, dem größten Bauträger der Vereinigten Arabischen Emirate. Doch den schillernden Videos über die berühmten drei Dubai Palmen „Jumeirah, Jebel Ali und Deira“ oder das Archipel „The World“ wurden offensichtlich selbstproduzierte Trailersequenzen der Meridian Capital Enterprises vorangestellt. Doch könnte es sich bei den Werbevideos um Fremdmaterial handeln.

Auch die auf der Webseite wahllos platzierten Fotos von bekannten Sehenswürdigkeiten Dubais fungieren als Augenfang für den interessierten Surfer mit eigenem Finanzierungswunsch. Bei einem Volumen von 10 Millionen Euro oder höher präsentiert sich die Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. als der passende Investitionspartner. Das Unternehmen verfügt weltweit über zahlreiche Standorte: Berlin, London, Barcelona, Warschau, Moskau, Dubai, Riad, Tel Aviv, Hong Kong und New York. Aber nahezu alle Standorte sind lediglich Virtual Offices eines global arbeitenden Büroservice-Anbieters. „Virtual Office“ heißt im Deutschen schlicht „Briefkastenfirma“. Unter solchen Büroadressen sollen laut Meridian Capital Enterprises ganze Kommissionen ansässig sein, alles zum Wohle des Kunden.“

Zitatende

Cyberstalking: Wer verfolgt wird, muss sich wehren

Wer Glück hat, muss nur seine E-Mail-Adresse wechseln oder unbestellte Waren zurücksenden. Schlimmstenfalls aber ist der Ruf ruiniert oder das Konto geplündert: Cyberstalking hat viele Formen. Wer von Unbekannten im Web terrorisiert wird, muss sich wehren. Die Polizei gibt Tipps.

Immer häufiger werden persönliche Daten laut Experten dazu verwandt, um anderen mit den Mitteln des Internets einen Streich zu spielen oder sie massiv unter Druck zu setzen. Imagepflege im Netz und ein sensibler Umgang mit Daten können helfen.
Anzeige

Cyberstalking ist ein Sammelbegriff von Anwälten und Polizei für Straftaten im Internet. Dabei stand das eingedeutschte Synonym für Internet (“Cyber(-space)”) genauso Pate wie das englische Verb “to stalk” (für anpirschen, anschleichen). “Cyberstalking ist ein Kunstbegriff”, sagt Ulrich Schulte am Hülse, Rechtsanwalt in Berlin. Eine genaue Definition liege bislang nicht vor. Unter dem Strich werden damit verschiedene Wege bezeichnet, auf denen Personen per Internet belästigt und verfolgt werden. Das Risiko, einmal betroffen zu sein, steigt mit der Häufigkeit der Nutzung, sagen die Experten.
Keine validen Zahlen

Denn Statistiken beispielsweise der Polizei liegen zu Cyberstalking nicht vor: “Es wird wohl immer mehr. Wir führen die Straftaten nicht unter diesem Begriff”, sagt Frank Scheulen, Sprecher des Landeskriminalamtes Nordrhein-Westfalen in Düsseldorf. “Mit der Zunahme und Verbreitung der Neuen Medien liegt es aber auf der Hand, dass auch Cyberstalking zunimmt”, sagt Professor Harald Dreßing vom Institut für Seelische Gesundheit in Mannheim.

Die Folgen sind Beleidigungen, aber auch ganz praktischer Ärger: “Unter fremden Namen kaufen und verkaufen Cyberstalker Waren im Online- und Versandhandel. Sie veröffentlichen Homepages, Blogs oder begehen Straftaten”, zählt Scheulen auf. Gängig sei auch das unerwünschte Senden und Versenden von E-Mails, das unbefugte Veröffentlichen oder Verfremden von Fotos oder von vermeintlichen Aussagen des Opfers mit anzüglichem Inhalt.
Unbedingt Anzeige erstatten

Meist führt ein allzu sorgloser Umgang mit den persönlichen Daten im Internet dazu. Wer Opfer von Cyberstalkern geworden ist, sollte unverzüglich Anzeige erstatten, rät Scheulen: “Dann kann die Polizei über den Provider und die IP-Adresse die Täter aufspüren.” Abmahnung, Unterlassungsverfügung und Schadensersatzforderungen hätten dann gute Erfolgsaussichten, sagt Schulte am Hülse. Zur Vorbereitung rechtlicher Schritte empfehle sich die Dokumentation des Cyberstalkings vom ersten Moment an.

Ein sensibler Umgang mit Internet und Daten hilft vorzubeugen. “Geben Sie keine persönlichen Informationen wie Hobbys oder Vorlieben preis”, rät Scheulen. Vor allem sollten keine Telefonnummern, Adressen oder Namen in Chatrooms veröffentlicht werden: “Man weiß nicht, wer sich im Netz verbirgt oder wie die Daten weiter genutzt werden.” Dreßing rät dazu, bei der Nutzung von SchülerVZ, Xing und Co. den Zugang zum privaten Profil auf Bekannte und Freunde zu limitieren. Es hänge sich schließlich auch niemand ein Schild mit persönlichen Daten um und renne damit durch die Innenstadt.

Liebe Leser,

aus gegebenem Anlass warnen wir vor den Fälschungen der “GoMoPa”-Betrüger auf

http://www.pressreleaser.org sowie vor deren Erpresser-Blogs wie z.B. der berüchtige “Scheisshausfliegen-Blog.”

Das ist die Fälschung:

Ihr Antiy-Cyberstalker-Crusade – Team

Anfang Oktober 2008 erhielt einer der Arbeiter der Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. eine Meldung von einem anonymen Sender, dass in naher Zukunft – zuerst im Internet, dann im Fernsehen, im Radio und in der deutschen Presse – Informationen erscheinen, die die Funktionsweise und Tätigkeiten der Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. in einem äußerst negativen Licht darstellen. Der Mitarbeiter der Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. wurde also informiert, dass diese Meldungen/Nachrichten zweifelsohne deutlich das Aussehen und den guten Ruf der Firma Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. beeinträchtigen.
Der an dieser Stelle erwähnte „Gesprächspartner” hat den Arbeiter der Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. informiert, dass die Möglichkeit besteht die peinliche Situation zu vermeiden, indem die Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. auf das von der Person gezeigte Konto die Summe von 100.000,00 EUR überweist. Wie sich aber später zeigte, war der Herr Klaus Maurischat – dieser anonyme Gesprächspartner – „Gehirn“ und „Lider des GOMOPA“. Die Ermittlungen wurden angestellt durch die Bundeskriminalpolizei (Verfolgungs- und Ermittlungsorgan auf der Bundesebene) während des Ermittlungsverfahrens wegen einer finanziellen Erpressung, Betrügereien auch wegen der Bedrohungen, welche von Herrn Maurischat und seine Mitarbeiter praktiziert wurden sowie wegen Teilnahme anderer (Leiter der Internetservices und Moderatoren der Blogs) an diesem Prozedere. Diese Straftaten wurden begangen zu Schaden vieler Berufs- und Justizpersonen, darunter auch der Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. Die Opfer dieses Verbrechens sind in Deutschland, Österreich, der Schweiz, Spanien, Portugal, Großbritannien, den USA und Kanada sichtbar.
In diesem Moment taucht folgende Frage auf: Wie war die Reaktion der Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. auf die Forderungen seitens GOMOPA? Entsprach die Reaktion den Erwartungen von GOMOPA? Hat die Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. die geforderte Summe 100.000,00 EUR überwiesen?
Seites der Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. gab es überhaupt keine Reaktion auf den Erpressungsversuch von GOMOPA. Ende August 2008 auf dem Service http://www.gompa.net sind zahlreiche Artikel/Meldungen erscheinen, welche die Tätigkeit der Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. in einem sehr negativen Licht dargestellt haben. Nachdem die auf http://www.gomopa.net enthaltenen Informationen ausführlich und vollständig analysiert worden waren, ergab es sich, dass sie der Wahrheit nicht einmal in einem Punkt entsprechen und potenzielle und bereits bestehende Kunden der Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. in Bezug auf die von diesem Finanzinstitut geführten Geschäftstätigkeit irreführen. Infolge der kriminellen Handlugen von GOMOPA und der mit ihm kooperierenden Services und Blogs im Netz hat die Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. beachtliche und messbare geschäftliche Verluste erlitten. Die Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. hat nämlich in erster Linie eine wichtige Gruppe von potenziellen Kund verloren. Was sich aber als wichtiger ergab, haben sich die bisherigen Kunden von der Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. kaum abgewandt. Diejenigen Kunden haben unsere Dienstleitungen weiterhin genutzt und nutzen die immer noch. In Hinblick auf die bisherige Zusammenarbeit mit der Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd., werden ihrerseits dem entsprechend keine Einwände erhoben .
GOMOPA hat so einen Verlauf der Ereignisse genau prognostiziert, dessen Ziel beachtliche und messbare geschäftliche durch die Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. erlittene Verluste waren. Der Verlauf der Ereignisse hat das Service GOMOPA mit Sicherheit gefreut. GOMOPA hat nämlich darauf gerechnet, dass die Stellung der Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. nachlässt und das Finanzinstitut die geforderte Summe (100.000,00 EUR) bereitstellt. Im Laufe der Zeit, als das ganze Prozedere im Netz immer populärer war, versuchte GOMOPA noch vier mal zu der Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. Kontakte aufzunehmen, indem es jedes mal das Einstellen dieser kriminellen „Kompanie” versprochen hat, wobei es jedes mal seine finanziellen Forderungen heraufsetzte. Die letzte für das Einstellen der „Kompanie“ gegen die Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. vorgesehene Quote betrug sogar 5.000.000,00 EUR (in Worten: fünfmilionen EURO). Die Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. konnte sich aber vor den ständig erhöhenden Forderungen seitens des Services GOMOPA behaupten.
Im Oktober 2008 traf die Leitung der Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. Entscheidung über die Benachrichtigung der Internationalen Polizei INTERPOL sowie entsprechender Strafverfolgungsorgane der BRD (die Polizei und die Staatsanwaltschaft) über den bestehenden Sachverhalt. In der Zwischenzeit meldeten sich bei der Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. zahlreiche Firmen und Korporationen, sogar Berufsperson wie Ärzte, Richter, Priester, Schauspieler und anderen Personen aus unterschiedlichen Ländern der Welt, die der Erpressung von GOMOPA nachgegeben und die geforderten Geldsummen überwiesen haben. Diese Personen gaben bereits Erklärungen ab, dass sie dies getan haben, damit man sie bloß endlich „in Ruhe lässt” und um unnötige Probleme, Schwierigkeiten und einen kaum begründbaren Ausklang vermeiden zu können. Die Opfer dieses kriminellen Vorgehens haben die Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. über unterschiedliche Geldsummen, welche verlangt wurden, informiert.
In einem Fall gab es verhältnismäßig kleine (um ein paar tausend EURO), in einem anderen Fall handelte es schon um beachtliche Summen (rund um paar Millionen EURO).
Zusätzlich wendeten sich an die Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. Firmen, welche dem GOMOPA noch keine „Gebühr” überweisen haben und bereits überlegen, ob sie dies tun sollen, oder nicht. Diese Firmen erwarteten von der Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. eine klare Stellungnahme sowie eine professionelle praktische Beratung, wie man sich in solch einer Lage verhalten soll und wie man diese Geldforderungen umgehen kann. Die Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. hat ausnahmslos allen Verbrechensopfern, welche sich bei unserer Firma gemeldet haben, eine Zusammenarbeit vorgeschlagen. Als oberste Aufgabe stellt sich diese Kooperation, gemeinsam entschlossene und wirksame Maßnahmen gegen GOMOPA, gegen andere Services im Netz sowie gegen alle Bloggers zu treffen, die an dem hier beschriebenen internationalen kriminellen Vorgehen mit GOMOPA-Führung teilnehmen.Auf unsere Bitte benachrichtigten alle mitbeteiligten Firmen die Internationale Polizei INTERPOL sowie ihre heimischen Verfolgungsorgane, u. a. die zuständige Staatsanwaltschaft und die Polizeibehörden über den bestehenden Sachverhalt.
In Hinblick auf die Tatsache, dass das verbrecherische Handeln von GOMOPA sich über viele Staaten erstreckte und dass die Anzahl der in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland erstatteten Anzeigen wegen der durch GOMOPA, Internetservices und Bloggers begangenen Straftaten, rasant wuchs – was zweifelsohne von einer weit gehenden kriminellen Wirkungskraft des GOMOPA zeugt – schlug die Internationale Wirtschaftspolizei INTERPOL der Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. vor, dass sich ihr Vertreter in Berlin mit dem Vertreter von GOMOPA trifft, um die „Zahlungsmodalitäten“ und Überweisung der Summe von 5.000.000,00 EUR zu besprechen. Dieser Schritt meinte, eine gut durchdachte und durch die Bundeskriminalpolizei organisierte Falle durchzuführen, deren Ziel die Festnahme der unter GOMOPA wirkenden internationalen Straftäter war.
Die koordinierten Schritte und Maßnahmen der Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. und anderer Beschädigter, geleitet von der Internationalen Wirtschaftspolizei INTERPOL, dem Bundeskriminalamt und der Staatsanwaltschaft der Bundesrepublik Deutschland haben zur Aus-, Einarbeitung und Durchführung der oben beschriebenen Falle beigetragen. Im November 2008 führte die in Berlin vorbereitete Falle zur Festnahme und Verhaftung des Vertreters des GOMOPA, der nach der Festnahme auf Herrn Klaus Maurichat – als den Hauptverantwortlichen und Anführer der internationalen kriminellen Gruppe GOMOPA verwies. Der Festgenommene benannte und zeigte der Bundeskriminalpolizei zugleich den aktuellen Aufenthaltsort des Herrn Klaus Maurischat. „Gehirn“ und Gründer dieser internationalen kriminellen Gruppe GOMOPA, Herr Klaus Maurischat wurde am selben Tag auch festgenommen und auf Frist verhaftet, wird bald in Anklagezustand gestellt, wird die Verantwortung für eigene Straftaten und die des Forums GOMOPA vor einem zuständigen Bundesgericht tragen. Die Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. unternahm bereits alle möglichen Schritte, damit Herr Klaus Maurischat auch auf der Anklagebank des zuständigen Gerichts des Vereinigten Königsreiches Großbritannien erscheint. Unter den beschädigten Berufs- und Justizpersonen aus Großbritannien, neben der Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. gibt es noch viele Opfer von GOMOPA…

Die dreisten Verbrecher wagen es unter http://www.pressreleaser.org, einer eigenen “GoMoPa”-Seite unsere Pressemitteilung oben zu verfälschen und unschuldige Personen zu belasten.

Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. unveils new criminal phenomena in network I. In recently appeared on the net more often at the same time a new a very worrying phenomenon of criminal nature. Professional criminals groups in the network are taking part, to extortion, fraud, Erschwindeln relating to certain specifically selected companies and businesses are capable of. These criminals developed new methods and means, simply and in a short time to bereichern.Strategien and manifestations, which underlie this process are fairly simple. A criminal is looking to “carefully” on the Internet specific companies and corporations (victims of crime) and informed them in the next step, that of the business activities of such companies and corporations in the near future – first on the Internet then in other available mass media – numerous and very unfavorable information appears. At the same time, the criminals beat their future victims an effective means of reducing unnecessary difficulties and problems to escape the loss of good name and image of the company and corporate sector. These offenders are aware of that reputation, name and appearance of each company is a value in itself. It was therefore a value of what each company is prepared to pay any price. But the reason for difficulties and problems arising from the loss of good name and reputation result. The criminals and their victims are already aware that this loss is devastating consequences might have been the closing down of a particular business can enforce. It takes both to No as well as at large companies regard. The company is concerned that in virtually every industry in each country and cross-border activities sind.Das criminal procedure in the form of a blackmail on money, a fraud is becoming rapidly and globally, ie led cross-border and internationally. Among the victims of extortion, fraud is now looking both at home (domestic) and international corporations, the major emphasis on conservation, keeping and maintaining their reputation in the business according to their credibility lay. The criminals in the network have understood that maintaining an unassailable reputation and name of a company the unique ability to provide fast and easy enrichment forms. The above-mentioned criminal procedure is difficult to track because it is international in nature, and by overlapping or even nonexistent (fictional) professional and judicial persons in various countries and operated company wird.Diese offenders in the network publish it and disseminate false information about your victims on remote servers, which are not uncommon in many exotic countries. There are those countries in which serious gaps in the legal system, investigative and prosecution procedures are visible. As an example, at this point mention India werden. Mit criminals working in the network grid portals known leader of blogs with your seat-consciously or unconsciously, even in highly developed countries. For example, at this point, countries such as Germany, Austria, Switzerland, the United States, Britain, Spain or Portugal are mentioned. The below listed criminals were able to act unpunished today. As a symptom of such action appears here the activity and “effectiveness” of the company GOMOPA, which is on countries such as Germany, Switzerland, Austria, the United States, Britain, Spain and India. A good example of such an action is Mr. Klaus Mauri Chat – the leader and “brain” of the company GOMOPA with many already in force and criminal judgments “on his account”, which in this way for years and funded its maintenance in the industry almost unlimited activity. This status will change dramatically, however, including far and wide thanks to discontinued operations of the firm Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. who would oppose such offenses addressed in the network. Other companies and corporations, in which the crime network and outside of this medium have fallen victim to contribute to combating such crimes bei.Die situation is changing, thanks to effective steps and the successful cooperation of the firm Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. with the international police Interpol, with the federal agency (FBI) in the U.S., the Federal Criminal Police in Germany, with Scotland Yard in Britain, as well as with the Russian secret service FSB.Die Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. – Together with other companies and cooperations, the victim of criminal activities of the network of crime have fallen – has undeniably already started to yield results. The fact that in recent weeks (November 2008) on the territory of the Federal Republic of Germany of the above-mentioned leaders and “brain” of the company GOMOPA, Mr Klaus Maurishat was arrested should not be ignored. The Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. information available results clearly show that the next arrests of persons participating in this process in such countries as: Austria, Switzerland, Russia, Ukraine, Poland, Spain, Mexico, Portugal, Brazil, the USA, Canada, UK, Ireland , Australia, New Zealand and made in a.. The ultimate goal of Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. and the other victims of crime in the network is to provide all participants in this criminal procedure before the competent court to lead. All professional and judicial persons, regardless of the seat and out of the business, which the above-described criminal action (fraud, extortion) to have fallen victim can of Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. led company to join the goal set at all at this point the procedure described those associated in the public and the economic life out. II blacklist blackmail and with international fraudsters and their methods (opus operandi) in the following countries: 1 The Federal Republic Deutschland2. Dubai 3rd Russia 1st The Federal Republic of Germany GmbH GOMOPA, Goldman Morgenstern & Partners LLC., Goldman Morgenstern & Partners Consulting LLC, Wottle collection. In these firms are quite active following persons: – Klaus Mauri Chat ( “Father” and “brain” of the criminal organization responsible for countless final judgments have been achieved (arrested in Germany in November 2008) – Josef Rudolf Heckel ( “right hand “when Mr Klaus Mauri chat, denounced former banker who is excessive in many Bankschmuggeleien was involved.

(Today, persona non grata in the German banking industry); – Peter Reski (responsible for Finance, known for fraud, tax fraud and embezzlement, which is already behind the judgments are final) – Mark Vornkahl (responsible for organizational and administrative tasks in GOMOPA, a former police officer dismissed because of numerous expectations in the service, already has a few final judgments “on his account”); – Claus i Ulrike Wottle (married couple, for the so-called “unconventional” enforcement of the debt for the benefit GOMOPA. This execution was imposing, with extortion violence based on both real and fictitious debts references? How does the system of GOMOPADie above-mentioned persons in Brief, as well as with the service GOMOPA cooperating, so-called “experts GOMOPA” Bloggers and all other professional and legal persons choose from all possible sources of information about large, rich companies and corporations coming in various domestic and international sectors of the economy. GOMOPA The service is particularly keen that those aussucht, the “in itself visible.” Those companies corporations and, therefore, against the relatively easy and without much effort himself, inconsistencies, etc. can be done in terms of the even crimes such as cheating and Erschwindeln Others can easily perform. It is well known that every company especially good at their presence and her name is inviolable. Each company will do everything according to their good presence also retain its credibility to be. But if the victim of GOMOPA and his “partner” and a large range of businesses, so it is possible to call such companies a quick, easy, and even considerably enriched. It appears at this point the question: Which clever criminals in the network and outside the network to me is success, it does not wish to benefit? The criminals in the network know that without business credibility there is no confidence that any business is essential. GOMOPA and all are cooperating with the security of all possible methods and measures mastered how to credibility and confidence of a company, a company, corporation (crime victims) in question. This moves just the attention of the user, so that the homepage of the GOMOPA http://www.gomopa.net in search engines like Google, Yahoo is easy to find. This, in turn, means nothing other than additional profits for the service GOMOPA because of its activity around a media discourse created wird.Ein at first glance commonplace and easy victims of extortion, for example, can a public governmental body, which, based on the credibility of public works, such as a bank or a foreign bank financial institution. So it was with the foreign banks, international financial institution Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. the case. A simple and easy victims of illicit profits and material may include insurance companies, where – as it is from our search results, much to the criminal activities of the GOMOPA especially in the area of the Federal Republic of Germany, Switzerland and Austria was due. Among the known and identifiable victims is certainly German, Austrian and Swiss banks, insurance companies such as Allianz of Germany, German and Austrian companies such as HDI and DKV visible. This is what the service GOMOPA trust and what with the cooperating services, blogs nowadays practice is the so-called cyber-stalking, which rapidly spread in the network. The method is criminal at this point and others in the threat that the business of an enterprise (Ofer blackmail, threats and forcible ) fictitious, even non-existent information (lies, rumors, stories, statements, insults) on the net first then in other mass media. This is only used to a potential victim to move a considerable sum of money for the so-called “peace “the blackmailer available. The” quiet “here means the promise of access lock with respect to the fictitious publication of any information on the net and in all other mass media, the victims of extortion in extremely negative light showing. Such threats are, as already above the goal of companies – potential victims of cyber-stalking to do likewise, that they themselves “buy.” In short, GOMOPA and his peers, and cooperating with those services, and blogs, create a “virtual reality”, or otherwise said publishing fictitious information on potential victims of a crime. firms and corporations, against which threats and extortion by GOMOPA are not due, ie those who for so-called “peace” does not want to pay, to be victims of serious lies, insults, and Insinuationen other criminal misappropriations, the appearance and presence of a firm with certainty. One is a target of GOMOPA, namely as fast and as easy as it goes, money abzukassieren, and if a company refuses, and the “peace” do not buy wishes, it is unexpectedly and quickly become an object of extortion and defamation on the net. At this point the following question arises: How is it possible that the leader of the firm GOMOPA, Mr Klaus Mauri chat, only in the Federal Republic of Germany on his account “23 court rulings, has for many years as an honest citizen to create, while other persons, firms, corporations criminal acts, offenses memorize, in addition to substantial sums of money could earn? This complex process can only be explained as follows: GOMOPA creates his appearance, his presence in the eyes of public opinion as an honest subject, against which pathological phenomena in the public and economic life einschreitet. GOMOPA and his partner (services, blogs) present themselves as followers of any Verbrechensart that promise so the fight against criminals in each virtual network ( especially against any cheaters, blackmailers). GOMOPA used in this respect a kind of “Merketingsvorhang” as a method of seduction, a result which is his true “face” and his true intentions than that of a fraudster and blackmail on money can hide. The true intentions of the GOMOPA, of working together GOMOPA Services and blogs were until today no doubt with success before the public opinion will remain hidden, especially thanks to the so-called “smoke curtain”, which reflects the fact that man himself as a “winner” of any abuse and any pathological appearance of the public and economic life in Aland German, Austria, Switzerland, the United States, Britain, Russia, Spain created. Next appears the GOMOPA forward by the person on which companies and corporations – the future victims of the crime that is – against the possibility of the release of extremely poor and the company concerned in a negative light visual information on the Internet and other mass media warns. The person from whom the speech is also informed that they are successful against such a procedure for a “fee” can be used. The GOMOPA is at this point up to the extortion of money for so-called “peace” to the company and corporation (the victim of a crime) around. Most of the companies concerned to such threats did not respond, because it’s everyday life and their agenda. It finally barely missing on the web of blackmail and outside of the medium. Normally so seldom so-called “understanding”, while on the one hand, the crime victim, on the other hand, the GOMOPA occurs. It is understandable that the price for such an “understanding” means the provision of the requested funds would GOMOPA. The financial blackmail in this stage is rarely enforced. The situation changes little, however, if the firms and corporations (crime victims) find that the threat was fulfilled. In Brief will appear on the homepage http://www.gomopa.net numerous newspaper articles, reports and bogus pseudo market analysis, both by GOMOPA as well as so-called “independent experts” and the company will be represented, with formal or fictitious GOMOPA together. Information published here, correspond to the contents of a threat and make the operations of firms and corporations in an extremely negative light dar. There is no doubt that such actions and methods only to harm the good name and good presence of these firms and corporations prerogatives. The activity of GOMOPA is certainly not exhausted. GOMOPA disseminated (published accommodates) the above information in the network by the credible, and popular opinion-operated services. Moreover, GOMOPA threatens the companies and corporations (its victims), that “from the finger-drawn” information not only on the network, but also on television and on radio and in the press landscape erscheinen.Wie the experience and expertise of the former Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. show that the services are usually not aware that they are for the purpose of a criminal action by the GOMOPA used. They agree with the corresponding fictitious publications, reports and analysis on what specifically GOMOPA through and through “independent” experts are prepared. It also states that the services, and blogs such cooperation with the GOMOPA approval, although they know that the information transmitted by GOMOPA are fictitious and the credibility of companies and corporations affect. They take so aware of the criminal procedure part. The explanation of this situation is quite simple. GOMOPA pays namely the services, and blogs related remuneration that the publication of false information on the companies and corporations (crime victims) agree. Some services, and blogs seem to know nothing about it to have that on their pages available information “fictitious” and “pulled out of the fingers are. Are you looking for in this way their conduct to justify, because they want the legal consequences of participating in the abuse of the good name and appearance of a company or corporation to escape. The activity system of GOMOPA of collaborating services and blogs was also the example of Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. tested. Beginning in October 2008 was one of the workers of Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. a message from an anonymous sender, in the near future – first on the Internet, then on television, radio and in the German press – information published by the functioning and activities of Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. in an extremely negative light show. The employee of Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. was then informed that these reports / news undoubtedly significantly the appearance and the reputation of the firm Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. affect. The place mentioned in this “conversation partner” has the workers of Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. informed that the possibility of the embarrassing situation to be avoided by Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. to the person shown by the account the sum of 100,000.00 EUR transfers. As later revealed, however, was Mr. Klaus Mauri Chat – this anonymous interlocutor – “brain” and “Leader of the GOMOPA”. The investigations have been employed by the Federal Judicial Police (tracking and identifying the body at the federal level) during the investigation for the payment of blackmail, fraud and threats because of what Mr Mauri chatting and his staff were practiced, and for participation by other (head of Internet services and moderators of blogs) on this process. These crimes have been committed to loss of many professional and judicial persons, including the Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. The victims of this crime in Germany, Austria, Switzerland, Spain, Portugal, Great Britain, the USA and Canada visible. At this moment appeared the following question: What was the reaction of Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. to the demands from GOMOPA? Corresponded to the response to the expectations of GOMOPA? Has the Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. the required sum of EUR 100,000.00 paid? Side of Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. There was absolutely no reaction to the extortion attempt by GOMOPA. At the end of August 2008 on the Service http://www.gompa.net numerous articles / reports published by the activities of Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. in a very negative light have represented. Once the information contained on http://www.gomopa.net detail and were fully analyzed, it is that they are not even the truth at one point and potential and existing customers of Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. in relation to the financial institution from this discontinued business activities is misleading. Following the criminal Handlugen of GOMOPA and its cooperating services, and blogs on the network, the Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. measurable and significant business losses. The Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. has primarily an important group of potential customers lost. But what it showed as important, the existing customers of Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. little away. Those customers have used our services and continue to use the still. In view of the existing collaboration with the Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.., Which will in turn be no objections. GOMOPA has such a course of events accurately predicted, which aims significant and measurable business by Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. losses were suffered. The course of events, the service GOMOPA certainly pleased. GOMOPA has to expect that the position of Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. declines and the financial institution, the required sum (100.000,00 EUR) provides. Over time, as the whole procedure in the network was becoming more popular, tried GOMOPA still four times to the Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. Contacts, each time by adjusting these criminal “Kompanie” has promised, although it every time his financial demands heraufsetzte. The last of the set of “company” against Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. ratio was even planned EUR 5,000,000.00 (in words: EURO fünfmilionen). The Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. could but before the ever-increasing demands from the Service GOMOPA claim. In October 2008 met the management of Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. Decision on the notification of the INTERPOL International Police and the appropriate law enforcement institutions of the FRG (the police and the prosecutor) about the existing situation. In the meantime, reported at the Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. numerous companies and corporations, and even professional person such as doctors, judges, priests, actors and other people from different countries of the world, the extortion of GOMOPA relented and the required amounts of money it had. These people already gave statements that they have done so, so they finally just “be in peace” and unnecessary problems, difficulties, and a reasonable conclusion hardly avoid them. The victims of this criminal action, the Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. using different amounts of money which were requested, informed. In one case, there were relatively small (a few thousand EURO), in another case it has to deliver significant amounts (around few million EURO). Additionally turned to Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. Companies which have not yet GOMOPA the “fee” on out and have already considered whether they should do or not. These firms anticipated by Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. a clear opinion as well as a practical professional advice on how to be in such a situation should behave and how they can avoid debt. The Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. has invariably victims of all crimes, which are at our company have made a cooperation proposed. The top task is to this cooperation, jointly determined and effective measures against GOMOPA against other services in the network, and against all Bloggers to meet in the here described with international criminal procedure GOMOPA leaders to participate. All these companies were known as the Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. proposed “crusade” against GOMOPA, his partner. At our request to notify all participating companies the INTERPOL International Police and their pursuit of domestic institutions, including the competent public prosecutor and the police authorities about the existing situation. In view of the fact that the criminal act of GOMOPA be extended over many states and that the number of the Federal Republic of Germany because the ads reimbursed by GOMOPA, Internet Services and Bloggers crimes, grew up fast – which no doubt influenced by a far-reaching impact of criminal of GOMOPA testifies – International Business, the Police INTERPOL Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. before that its representatives in Berlin with representatives from GOMOPA true to the “payment arrangements and transfer the sum of EUR 5,000,000.00 to discuss. This step meant a well thought-out and by the Federal Criminal Police organized the event to carry out aimed at the arrest of international criminals GOMOPA acting was. The coordinated steps and measures of Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. Damaged and others, led by the International Economic Police INTERPOL, the Federal Criminal Police Office and the Prosecutor of the Federal Republic of Germany for education, training and implementation of the above-described case contributed. In November 2008, the event in Berlin prepared for the apprehension and arrest of the representative of the GOMOPA, after the arrest of Mr. Klaus Mauri chat – as the main leaders and leaders of international criminal group GOMOPA recalled. The arrest and notified the Federal Criminal Police showed both the current whereabouts of Mr. Klaus Mauri chat. “Brain” and the founder of this international criminal group GOMOPA, Mr Klaus Mauri chat on the same day was also arrested and imprisoned on time, will soon put in charge state, the responsibility for their own crimes and those of the forum, before a competent GOMOPA Federal wear. The Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. undertook all possible steps to ensure that Mr. Klaus Mauri chatting on the dock of the competent court of the United Kingdom of Great Britain appears. Among the damaged work and justice people from United Kingdom, along with the Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. There are many victims of GOMOPA: The beginning of the arrests with such a scale means for the German judiciary and a major breakthrough point. It is worth noting that the prosecution bodies of the Federal Republic, up to this stage of the long-standing criminal activity of Mr. Klaus Mauri chatting and his staff were powerless. Prolonged impunity of the criminal actions of Mr. Klaus Mauri chat, for years the “first violin” in GOMOPA played, is to end gegangen.An this point another question arises: how is it so go on? The arrest of Mr. Klaus chat Mauri is a critical moment, in other words a “turn around 180 degrees” for him personally. But it also means the beginning of the end “for its employees, for Internet Services, Bloggers, with GOMOPA so happy and had worked together without contradiction. There is no doubt that the cause of Mr Klaus Mauri chat at the top of the “iceberg” is. The above-mentioned turning point on this issue will be further arrests and detentions of members GOMOPA bring with them, and all persons from all areas involved in this transnational criminal actions have taken part. For information (reports by the end of December 2008), which of Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. available, the result that the next arrests currently prepared to be associated with the Services GOMOPA cooperating persons. This is to people outside Germany – from where Mr Klaus Mauri chat coming – refer. The details may be at this point in terms of legal and course of the prosecution bodies of the BRG and the Interpol-led investigation can not be betrayed. The Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. currently can only illustrate information from the investigation led the public to the criminal liability not to have this moment wird.In so intense preparations for the arrest of a number of persons outside the Federal Republic of Germany. This applies particularly to countries such as the following: – Russia-Ukraine – Poland – Spain – Mexico – Portugal – Brazil – the United States of America – Canada – UK – Ireland – Australia – New Zealand – India. All professional and judicial persons, regardless of the country in which they accompany the Office, or its citizens, and until now, consciously or unconsciously with the Forum GOMOPA together, or continue to work together to arouse the suspicion of the INTERPOL International Police. This works with the police criminal investigation department in each country, to the above persons first identify and then to legally pursue them. Information about this topic, as well as on the beginning and end of the activity of the GOMOPA can be at the following addresses on the Web at: http://gomopaabzocker.wordpress.com/http://www.nepper-schlepper-bauernfaenger.comhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qNpzAu-QMuEhttp://www.korte.de/alexander/2006/01/gomopa-finanforum-kritik.html- http://evelux.de/gomopa-sam-240/- http://blog.deobald.org/archive/2007/07/01/betrugsvorwurf-gomopa-spam/ 2. Dubai KLP Group Emirates – United Arab Emirates. As head of the company is Mr Martin Kraeter, not only as the “brain” of the whole company, but also as a longstanding friend of Mr Klaus Mauri Chat (GOMOPA-wire) acts. This company wants to hide and not even officially exist, that they as a strategic partner of the GOMOPA in the area of the Middle East, according to the territory of the Persian coast operates. Official activities of the company KLP Group Emirates includes among others the following areas: financial advisory services from the offshore area (Management Services – Facilitators – OffshoreConsultants, International Tax & Legal Consultants – Fiduciaries). In the sphere of activities of the Company will include the creation of companies and enterprises in the so-called “tax havens” to the tax liability to the company activity entfliehen.Inoffizielle KLP Group Emirates includes cooperation with the Service GOMOPA in the field of “Gelwäsche”. The monies are a result of criminal activity by GOMOPA generated by advanced professional and judicial persons soon throughout the world and legalized. The illegality based on the activity of the company KLP Group Emirates, as well as the cooperation with the Services GOMOPA attracted attention even when the prosecution organs of the United Kingdom of Great Britain, especially in Scotland Yard, which on this issue an intensive investigation has begun, which is in the ” development phase is located. It must be noted that all professional and judicial persons, but especially the clients of the company KLP Group Emirates, with the company KLP Group Emirates have cooperated in the past and still do, under the “Lupp” of Scotland Yard to be .3. Russlanda) The Company E-XECUTIVE by the Lord led Novosartow Vilen. On the homepage of the Company contained information comes directly from the company GOMOPA. The company e XECUTIVE leads the close cooperation not only with GOMOPA, but also with another on the Russian territory under the name of OOO UK broker functioning company. The company e XECUTIVE in connection with the company OOO UK broker is a member of a criminal group led by GOMOPA. The company e XECUTIVE GOMOPA representing interests in Russia and Central-Eastern Europe. Unofficially, the company employs E XECUTIVE-especially with the search for potential “victims” of the Erschwindelns, blackmail and forcing the funds for GOMOPA companies and corporations from the territory of Russia, Ukraine, and from all countries in Central Eastern Europe. Officially, the company e XECUTIVE one to the forum GOMOPA similar industrial activity. b) OOO “UK broker.” Head of the firm is Mr. Pavel Kokarev. This company is not concealed, that they are consistent with the Forum GOMOPA cooperates. The company OOO UK broker represents GOMOPA in Central Eastern Europe, including Russia. You shall be officially transferred to this area the GOMOPA similar activity, but unofficially it is to search for potential “victims” of racketeering, fraud and Erschwindelns for GOMOPA employed. The company has remained until now spared from any punishment, it could with “eternal impunity” because of a poorly developed, corrupt legal system in Russia expected. The situation may change after Mr. Klaus Mauri Chat arrested in Berlin and was arrested. This constant offenders, the “on his account” a set of legally enforceable judgments has, until now his freedom has unlimited recover, the do not know quite what it means to be arrested, begins gradually, according to our available information to finally “to bear witness.” This is understandable when one considers the threat of a penalty he considered. This delinquent shows growing interest in cooperation with the German tracking and identifying bodies. So there is a chance that other people he unveiled to the public by providing for reduction of prison sentence counts. It is also the only question of time INTERPOL, in cooperation with the Russian Service (FSB) of the Company OOO UK broker “at the door knocking”, which by Mr. Pavle Kokarev and represented. The company OOO UK broker has a virtual office in REGUS building in Moscow, is not even a person, forming a typical one-person company, which all business “crimes” may be the name of it, with no civil liability to pay. The Lord Pavel Kokarev seems to have forgotten or do not have sufficient knowledge about its possible responsibility fier to participate in the international crimes under the direction of Gomopa.

Roland Jahn, Federal Commissioner for the Stasi Archives | Journal Interview

Beweis: Wie “GoMoPa” Meridian Capital erpresst hat und Maurischat von Interpol und BKA festgenommen wurde – Verwirrspiele nach STASI-Muster

Nachfolgend bringen wir eine Original-Pressemeldung von „GoMoPa“, dem „NACHRICHTENDIENST“ mit dem Meridian Capital, London, erpresst werden sollte. Der Artikel strotzt nur von Fehlern. Damit ist deutlich, dass „GoMoPa“ tatsäch Meridian Capital erpresst hat und die Aktionen von Meridian Capital sich gegen „GoMoPa“ gerichtet haben.
Die gefälschte Pressemitteilung von Meridian Capital in Bezug auf unser Haus soll von dem „NACHRICHTENDIENST“ „GoMoPa“ ablenken.

„GoMopa“ schreibt:

08.09.2008
Weltweite Finanzierungen mit Widersprüchen

Die Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. gibt an, weltweite Finanzierungen anbieten zu können und präsentiert sich hierbei auf aufwendig kreierten Webseiten. GOMOPA hat die dort gemachten Angaben analysiert und Widersprüche entdeckt.

Der Firmensitz

Der Firmensitz befindet sich laut eigener Aussage in Dubai, Vereinigte Arabische Emirate. In einem GOMOPA vorliegenden Schreiben der Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. heißt es jedoch, der Firmensitz sei in London. Auf der Homepage des Unternehmens taucht die Geschäftsadresse in der Londoner Old Broad Street nur als „Kundenabteilung für deutschsprachige Kunden“ auf. Eine weitere Adresse in der englischen Hauptstadt, diesmal in der Windsor Avenue, sei die „Abteilung der Zusammenarbeit mit Investoren“.

Die Meridian Capital Enterprises ist tatsächlich als „Limited“ (Ltd.) mit Sitz in England und Wales eingetragen. Aber laut Firmenhomepage hat das Unternehmen seinen „rechtlichen Geschäftssitz“ in Dubai. Eine Abfrage beim Gewerbeamt Dubais (DED) zu dieser Firmierung bleibt ergebnislos.

Bemerkenswert ist auch der vermeintliche Sitz in Israel. Auf der Webseite von Meridian Capital Enterprises heißt es: „Die Firma Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. ist im Register des israelischen Justizministeriums unter der Nummer 514108471, gemäß dem Gesellschaftsrecht von 1999, angemeldet.“ Hierzu Martin Kraeter, Gomopa-Partner und Prinzipal der KLP Group Emirates in Dubai: „Es würde keinem einzigen Emirati – geschweige denn einem Scheich auch nur im Traum einfallen, direkte Geschäfte mit Personen oder Firmen aus Israel zu tätigen. Und schon gar nicht würde er zustimmen, dass sein Konterfei auch noch mit vollem Namen auf der Webseite eines Israelischen Unternehmens prangt.“

Auf der Internetseite sind diverse Fotos mit Scheichs an Konferenztischen zu sehen. Doch diese großen Tagungen und großen Kongresse der Meridian Capital Enterprises werden in den Pressearchiven der lokalen Presse Dubais mit keinem Wort erwähnt.
Martin Kraeter: „ Ein ‚britisch-arabisch-israelisches bankfremdes Finanzinstitut sein zu wollen, wie die Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. es darstellt, ist mehr als zweifelhaft. So etwas gibt es schlicht und ergreifend nicht! Der Nahostkonflikt schwelt schon seit mehr als 50 Jahren. Hier in den Vereinigten Arabischen Emiraten (VAE) werden Israelis erst gar nicht ins Land gelassen. Israelische Produkte sind gebannt. Es gibt nicht einmal direkte Telefonverbindungen. Die VAE haben fast 70% der Wiederaufbaukosten des Libanon geschultert, nachdem Israel dort einmarschiert ist.“

Zwei angebliche Großinvestitionen der Meridian Capital Enterprises in Dubai sind Investmentruinen bzw. erst gar nicht realisierte Projekte. Das Unternehmen wirbt mit ihrer finanziellen Beteiligung an dem Dubai Hydropolis Hotel und dem Dubai Snowdome.

Der Aktivitätsstatus der Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. ist laut englischen Handelsregister (UK Companies House) „dormant“ gemeldet. Auf der Grundlage des englischen Gesellschaftsrechts können sich eingetragene Unternehmen selbst „dormant“ (schlafend) melden, wenn sie keine oder nur unwesentliche buchhalterisch zu erfassende Transaktionen vorgenommen haben. Dies ist angesichts der angeblichen globalen Investitionstätigkeit der Meridian Capital Ltd. sehr erstaunlich.

Der Webauftritt

Die Internetseite der MCE ist sehr aufwendig gestaltet, die Investitionen angeblich in Millionen- und Milliardenhöhe. Bei näherer Betrachtung der Präsentationselemente fällt jedoch auf, dass es sich bei zahlreichen veröffentlichen Fotos, die Veranstaltungen der Meridian Capital Enterprises dokumentieren sollen, meist um Fotos von Online-Zeitungen oder frei zugänglichen Medienfotos einzelner Institutionen handelt wie z.B. der Börse Dubai.

Auf der Internetpräsenz befinden sich Videofilmchen, die eine frappierende Ähnlichkeit mit dem Werbematerial von NAKHEEL aufweisen, dem größten Bauträger der Vereinigten Arabischen Emirate. Doch den schillernden Videos über die berühmten drei Dubai Palmen „Jumeirah, Jebel Ali und Deira“ oder das Archipel „The World“ wurden offensichtlich selbstproduzierte Trailersequenzen der Meridian Capital Enterprises vorangestellt. Doch könnte es sich bei den Werbevideos um Fremdmaterial handeln.

Auch die auf der Webseite wahllos platzierten Fotos von bekannten Sehenswürdigkeiten Dubais fungieren als Augenfang für den interessierten Surfer mit eigenem Finanzierungswunsch. Bei einem Volumen von 10 Millionen Euro oder höher präsentiert sich die Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. als der passende Investitionspartner. Das Unternehmen verfügt weltweit über zahlreiche Standorte: Berlin, London, Barcelona, Warschau, Moskau, Dubai, Riad, Tel Aviv, Hong Kong und New York. Aber nahezu alle Standorte sind lediglich Virtual Offices eines global arbeitenden Büroservice-Anbieters. „Virtual Office“ heißt im Deutschen schlicht „Briefkastenfirma“. Unter solchen Büroadressen sollen laut Meridian Capital Enterprises ganze Kommissionen ansässig sein, alles zum Wohle des Kunden.“

Zitatende

Dies ist das altbekannte Muster des „NACHRCHTENDIENSTES“ „GoMoPa“ und seiner Berliner und Hamburger Komplizen Falschmeldungen zu verbreiten, um Firmen und Personen erpressen oder ausschalten zu können.


Aktenzeichen ST/0148943/2011: Immer wieder verfremden die vorbestraften Serienbetrüger Pressemeldungen von uns und der SJB-GoMoPa-Opfer (http://www.sjb-fonds-opfer.com) und verfälschen sie, um Verwirrung zu stiften und von ihren eigenen Taten abzulenken. Die persönlichen Angriffe gegen mich und andere Personen aus meinem Umfeld, sollen uns dazu bewegen, die kritischen Berichte über die Cyber-Stasi des 21. Jahrhunderts und deren Hintermänner einzustellen, sowie sie zuvor viele andere Journalisten eingeschüchtert haben, so dass deren Beiträge dann gelöscht wurden. Im Interesse aller Marktteilnehmer werden wir das ganz gewiss NICHT tun. Dies ist uns vielmehr ein Ansporn und eine Verpflichtung, die Öffentlichkeit über das Treiben der Cybermörder und wohl auch realen Mörder aufzuklären, damit diesen Stasi-Verbrechern, das Handwerk gelegt wird und sie nicht noch mehr rechtschaffene Menschen mit ihrem hahnebüchernen Unsinn verleumden, erpressen, betrügen und sie dann sogar ermorden können. Deshalb hier noch einmal zur Klarstellung: Der vorbestrafte Erpresser, Betrüger und wohl auch mutmassliche Mörder Heinz Gerlachs Klaus-Dieter Maurischat ist auf der Flucht.

Bereits einmal, im Dezember 2008, wurde er in Berlin auf Betreiben von Meridian Capital festgenommen. Zuvor sind er und sein mutmasslicher Komplize laut Meridian Capital bereits 23 verurteilt worden. Dokumente hierzu unter: http://sjb-fonds-opfer.com/?page_id=11764 Näheres zu Maurischat: Über eine selbstgebaute Blogseite verbreiten die GoMoPa-Gangster eine gefälschte Stellung von Meridian Capital, um Verwirrung zu stiften. Diese Blogseite existiert erst seit Deztember 2010. Beweis: http://www.hypestat.com/pressreleaser.org Die Meridian Capital-Seite, das Original, http://othergomopa.blogspot.com/ ist dagegen bereits seit 2009 online Beweis: Aussage Meridian Capital und KLAUS DIETER MAURISCHAT IN DETENTION

Source: http://klaus-dieter-maurischat.blogspot.com/2009/01/klaus-dieter-maurischat-in-haft.html Hinzu kommt Verurteilung wegen Betruges am eigenen Anleger sowie die Kursmanipulation in Sachen Wirecard etc pp.- Hier exemplarisch die Verurteilung wegen Betruges am eigenen Anleger: Klaus Maurischat und Mark Vornkahl, Betreiber vonwww.gomopa.net: Am 24. April 2006 war die Verhandlung am Amtsgericht Krefeld in der Betrugssache: Mark Vornkahl / Klaus Maurischat ./. Dehnfeld. Aktenzeichen: 28 Ls 85/05 Klaus MaurischatLange Straße 3827313 Dörverden.Das in diesem Verfahren ausschließlich diese Betrugsache verhandelt wurde, ist das Urteil gegen Klaus Maurischat recht mäßig ausgefallen.

SATURDAY, JULY 11, 2009

KLAUS DIETER MAURISCHAT IN DETENTION

Source: http://klaus-dieter-maurischat.blogspot.com/2009/01/klaus-dieter-maurischat-in-haft.html
KLAUS DIETER MAURISCHAT IN HAFT – DownloadGerman VersionHere is a Google Translation (German -> English)

Sunday 18 Januar 2009 January 2009

KLAUS DIETER MAURISCHAT IN DETENTIONMeridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. unveils new criminal phenomena in network I. SachverhaltIn recently appeared on the net more often at the same time a new a very worrying phenomenon of criminal nature. Professional criminals groups in the network are taking part, to extortion, fraud, Erschwindeln relating to certain specifically selected companies and businesses are capable of. These criminals developed new methods and means, simply and in a short time to bereichern.Strategien and manifestations, which underlie this process are fairly simple. A criminal is looking to “carefully” on the Internet specific companies and corporations (victims of crime) and informed them in the next step, that of the business activities of such companies and corporations in the near future – first on the Internet then in other available mass media – numerous and very unfavorable information appears. At the same time, the criminals beat their future victims an effective means of reducing unnecessary difficulties and problems to escape the loss of good name and image of the company and corporate sector. These offenders are aware of that reputation, name and appearance of each company is a value in itself. It was therefore a value of what each company is prepared to pay any price. But the reason for difficulties and problems arising from the loss of good name and reputation result. The criminals and their victims are already aware that this loss is devastating consequences might have been the closing down of a particular business can enforce. It takes both to No as well as at large companies regard. The company is concerned that in virtually every industry in each country and cross-border activities sind.Das criminal procedure in the form of a blackmail on money, a fraud is becoming rapidly and globally, ie led cross-border and internationally. Among the victims of extortion, fraud is now looking both at home (domestic) and international corporations, the major emphasis on conservation, keeping and maintaining their reputation in the business according to their credibility lay. The criminals in the network have understood that maintaining an unassailable reputation and name of a company the unique ability to provide fast and easy enrichment forms. The above-mentioned criminal procedure is difficult to track because it is international in nature, and by overlapping or even nonexistent (fictional) professional and judicial persons in various countries and operated company wird.Diese offenders in the network publish it and disseminate false information about your victims on remote servers, which are not uncommon in many exotic countries. There are those countries in which serious gaps in the legal system, investigative and prosecution procedures are visible. As an example, at this point mention India werden. Mit criminals working in the network grid portals known leader of blogs with your seat-consciously or unconsciously, even in highly developed countries. For example, at this point, countries such as Germany, Austria, Switzerland, the United States, Britain, Spain or Portugal are mentioned. The below listed criminals were able to act unpunished today. As a symptom of such action appears here the activity and “effectiveness” of the company GOMOPA, which is on countries such as Germany, Switzerland, Austria, the United States, Britain, Spain and India. A good example of such an action is Mr. Klaus Mauri Chat – the leader and “brain” of the company GOMOPA with many already in force and criminal judgments “on his account”, which in this way for years and funded its maintenance in the industry almost unlimited activity. This status will change dramatically, however, including far and wide thanks to discontinued operations of the firm Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. who would oppose such offenses addressed in the network. Other companies and corporations, in which the crime network and outside of this medium have fallen victim to contribute to combating such crimes bei.Die situation is changing, thanks to effective steps and the successful cooperation of the firm Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. with the international police Interpol, with the federal agency (FBI) in the U.S., the Federal Criminal Police in Germany, with Scotland Yard in Britain, as well as with the Russian secret service FSB.Die Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. – Together with other companies and cooperations, the victim of criminal activities of the network of crime have fallen – has undeniably already started to yield results. The fact that in recent weeks (November 2008) on the territory of the Federal Republic of Germany of the above-mentioned leaders and “brain” of the company GOMOPA, Mr Klaus Maurishat was arrested should not be ignored. The Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. information available results clearly show that the next arrests of persons participating in this process in such countries as: Austria, Switzerland, Russia, Ukraine, Poland, Spain, Mexico, Portugal, Brazil, the USA, Canada, UK, Ireland , Australia, New Zealand and made in a.. The ultimate goal of Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. and the other victims of crime in the network is to provide all participants in this criminal procedure before the competent court to lead. All professional and judicial persons, regardless of the seat and out of the business, which the above-described criminal action (fraud, extortion) to have fallen victim can of Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. led company to join the goal set at all at this point the procedure described those associated in the public and the economic life out. II blacklist blackmail and with international fraudsters and their methods (opus operandi) in the following countries: 1 The Federal Republic Deutschland2. Dubai 3rd Russia 1st The Federal Republic of Germany GmbH GOMOPA, Goldman Morgenstern & Partners LLC., Goldman Morgenstern & Partners Consulting LLC, Wottle collection. In these firms are quite active following persons: – Klaus Mauri Chat ( “Father” and “brain” of the criminal organization responsible for countless final judgments have been achieved (arrested in Germany in November 2008) – Josef Rudolf Heckel ( “right hand “when Mr Klaus Mauri chat, denounced former banker who is excessive in many Bankschmuggeleien was involved.(Today, persona non grata in the German banking industry); – Peter Reski (responsible for Finance, known for fraud, tax fraud and embezzlement, which is already behind the judgments are final) – Mark Vornkahl (responsible for organizational and administrative tasks in GOMOPA, a former police officer dismissed because of numerous expectations in the service, already has a few final judgments “on his account”); – Claus i Ulrike Wottle (married couple, for the so-called “unconventional” enforcement of the debt for the benefit GOMOPA. This execution was imposing, with extortion violence based on both real and fictitious debts references? How does the system of GOMOPADie above-mentioned persons in Brief, as well as with the service GOMOPA cooperating, so-called “experts GOMOPA” Bloggers and all other professional and legal persons choose from all possible sources of information about large, rich companies and corporations coming in various domestic and international sectors of the economy. GOMOPA The service is particularly keen that those aussucht, the “in itself visible.” Those companies corporations and, therefore, against the relatively easy and without much effort himself, inconsistencies, etc. can be done in terms of the even crimes such as cheating and Erschwindeln Others can easily perform. It is well known that every company especially good at their presence and her name is inviolable. Each company will do everything according to their good presence also retain its credibility to be. But if the victim of GOMOPA and his “partner” and a large range of businesses, so it is possible to call such companies a quick, easy, and even considerably enriched. It appears at this point the question: Which clever criminals in the network and outside the network to me is success, it does not wish to benefit? The criminals in the network know that without business credibility there is no confidence that any business is essential. GOMOPA and all are cooperating with the security of all possible methods and measures mastered how to credibility and confidence of a company, a company, corporation (crime victims) in question. This moves just the attention of the user, so that the homepage of the GOMOPA http://www.gomopa.net in search engines like Google, Yahoo is easy to find. This, in turn, means nothing other than additional profits for the service GOMOPA because of its activity around a media discourse created wird.Ein at first glance commonplace and easy victims of extortion, for example, can a public governmental body, which, based on the credibility of public works, such as a bank or a foreign bank financial institution. So it was with the foreign banks, international financial institution Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. the case. A simple and easy victims of illicit profits and material may include insurance companies, where – as it is from our search results, much to the criminal activities of the GOMOPA especially in the area of the Federal Republic of Germany, Switzerland and Austria was due. Among the known and identifiable victims is certainly German, Austrian and Swiss banks, insurance companies such as Allianz of Germany, German and Austrian companies such as HDI and DKV visible. This is what the service GOMOPA trust and what with the cooperating services, blogs nowadays practice is the so-called cyber-stalking, which rapidly spread in the network. The method is criminal at this point and others in the threat that the business of an enterprise (Ofer blackmail, threats and forcible ) fictitious, even non-existent information (lies, rumors, stories, statements, insults) on the net first then in other mass media. This is only used to a potential victim to move a considerable sum of money for the so-called “peace “the blackmailer available. The” quiet “here means the promise of access lock with respect to the fictitious publication of any information on the net and in all other mass media, the victims of extortion in extremely negative light showing. Such threats are, as already above the goal of companies – potential victims of cyber-stalking to do likewise, that they themselves “buy.” In short, GOMOPA and his peers, and cooperating with those services, and blogs, create a “virtual reality”, or otherwise said publishing fictitious information on potential victims of a crime. firms and corporations, against which threats and extortion by GOMOPA are not due, ie those who for so-called “peace” does not want to pay, to be victims of serious lies, insults, and Insinuationen other criminal misappropriations, the appearance and presence of a firm with certainty. One is a target of GOMOPA, namely as fast and as easy as it goes, money abzukassieren, and if a company refuses, and the “peace” do not buy wishes, it is unexpectedly and quickly become an object of extortion and defamation on the net. At this point the following question arises: How is it possible that the leader of the firm GOMOPA, Mr Klaus Mauri chat, only in the Federal Republic of Germany on his account “23 court rulings, has for many years as an honest citizen to create, while other persons, firms, corporations criminal acts, offenses memorize, in addition to substantial sums of money could earn? This complex process can only be explained as follows: GOMOPA creates his appearance, his presence in the eyes of public opinion as an honest subject, against which pathological phenomena in the public and economic life einschreitet. GOMOPA and his partner (services, blogs) present themselves as followers of any Verbrechensart that promise so the fight against criminals in each virtual network ( especially against any cheaters, blackmailers). GOMOPA used in this respect a kind of “Merketingsvorhang” as a method of seduction, a result which is his true “face” and his true intentions than that of a fraudster and blackmail on money can hide. The true intentions of the GOMOPA, of working together GOMOPA Services and blogs were until today no doubt with success before the public opinion will remain hidden, especially thanks to the so-called “smoke curtain”, which reflects the fact that man himself as a “winner” of any abuse and any pathological appearance of the public and economic life in Aland German, Austria, Switzerland, the United States, Britain, Russia, Spain created. Next appears the GOMOPA forward by the person on which companies and corporations – the future victims of the crime that is – against the possibility of the release of extremely poor and the company concerned in a negative light visual information on the Internet and other mass media warns. The person from whom the speech is also informed that they are successful against such a procedure for a “fee” can be used. The GOMOPA is at this point up to the extortion of money for so-called “peace” to the company and corporation (the victim of a crime) around. Most of the companies concerned to such threats did not respond, because it’s everyday life and their agenda. It finally barely missing on the web of blackmail and outside of the medium. Normally so seldom so-called “understanding”, while on the one hand, the crime victim, on the other hand, the GOMOPA occurs. It is understandable that the price for such an “understanding” means the provision of the requested funds would GOMOPA. The financial blackmail in this stage is rarely enforced. The situation changes little, however, if the firms and corporations (crime victims) find that the threat was fulfilled. In Brief will appear on the homepage http://www.gomopa.net numerous newspaper articles, reports and bogus pseudo market analysis, both by GOMOPA as well as so-called “independent experts” and the company will be represented, with formal or fictitious GOMOPA together. Information published here, correspond to the contents of a threat and make the operations of firms and corporations in an extremely negative light dar. There is no doubt that such actions and methods only to harm the good name and good presence of these firms and corporations prerogatives. The activity of GOMOPA is certainly not exhausted. GOMOPA disseminated (published accommodates) the above information in the network by the credible, and popular opinion-operated services. Moreover, GOMOPA threatens the companies and corporations (its victims), that “from the finger-drawn” information not only on the network, but also on television and on radio and in the press landscape erscheinen.Wie the experience and expertise of the former Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. show that the services are usually not aware that they are for the purpose of a criminal action by the GOMOPA used. They agree with the corresponding fictitious publications, reports and analysis on what specifically GOMOPA through and through “independent” experts are prepared. It also states that the services, and blogs such cooperation with the GOMOPA approval, although they know that the information transmitted by GOMOPA are fictitious and the credibility of companies and corporations affect. They take so aware of the criminal procedure part. The explanation of this situation is quite simple. GOMOPA pays namely the services, and blogs related remuneration that the publication of false information on the companies and corporations (crime victims) agree. Some services, and blogs seem to know nothing about it to have that on their pages available information “fictitious” and “pulled out of the fingers are. Are you looking for in this way their conduct to justify, because they want the legal consequences of participating in the abuse of the good name and appearance of a company or corporation to escape. The activity system of GOMOPA of collaborating services and blogs was also the example of Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. tested. Beginning in October 2008 was one of the workers of Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. a message from an anonymous sender, in the near future – first on the Internet, then on television, radio and in the German press – information published by the functioning and activities of Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. in an extremely negative light show. The employee of Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. was then informed that these reports / news undoubtedly significantly the appearance and the reputation of the firm Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. affect. The place mentioned in this “conversation partner” has the workers of Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. informed that the possibility of the embarrassing situation to be avoided by Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. to the person shown by the account the sum of 100,000.00 EUR transfers. As later revealed, however, was Mr. Klaus Mauri Chat – this anonymous interlocutor – “brain” and “Leader of the GOMOPA”. The investigations have been employed by the Federal Judicial Police (tracking and identifying the body at the federal level) during the investigation for the payment of blackmail, fraud and threats because of what Mr Mauri chatting and his staff were practiced, and for participation by other (head of Internet services and moderators of blogs) on this process. These crimes have been committed to loss of many professional and judicial persons, including the Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. The victims of this crime in Germany, Austria, Switzerland, Spain, Portugal, Great Britain, the USA and Canada visible. At this moment appeared the following question: What was the reaction of Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. to the demands from GOMOPA? Corresponded to the response to the expectations of GOMOPA? Has the Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. the required sum of EUR 100,000.00 paid? Side of Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. There was absolutely no reaction to the extortion attempt by GOMOPA. At the end of August 2008 on the Service http://www.gompa.net numerous articles / reports published by the activities of Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. in a very negative light have represented. Once the information contained on http://www.gomopa.net detail and were fully analyzed, it is that they are not even the truth at one point and potential and existing customers of Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. in relation to the financial institution from this discontinued business activities is misleading. Following the criminal Handlugen of GOMOPA and its cooperating services, and blogs on the network, the Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. measurable and significant business losses. The Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. has primarily an important group of potential customers lost. But what it showed as important, the existing customers of Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. little away. Those customers have used our services and continue to use the still. In view of the existing collaboration with the Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.., Which will in turn be no objections. GOMOPA has such a course of events accurately predicted, which aims significant and measurable business by Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. losses were suffered. The course of events, the service GOMOPA certainly pleased. GOMOPA has to expect that the position of Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. declines and the financial institution, the required sum (100.000,00 EUR) provides. Over time, as the whole procedure in the network was becoming more popular, tried GOMOPA still four times to the Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. Contacts, each time by adjusting these criminal “Kompanie” has promised, although it every time his financial demands heraufsetzte. The last of the set of “company” against Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. ratio was even planned EUR 5,000,000.00 (in words: EURO fünfmilionen). The Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. could but before the ever-increasing demands from the Service GOMOPA claim. In October 2008 met the management of Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. Decision on the notification of the INTERPOL International Police and the appropriate law enforcement institutions of the FRG (the police and the prosecutor) about the existing situation. In the meantime, reported at the Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. numerous companies and corporations, and even professional person such as doctors, judges, priests, actors and other people from different countries of the world, the extortion of GOMOPA relented and the required amounts of money it had. These people already gave statements that they have done so, so they finally just “be in peace” and unnecessary problems, difficulties, and a reasonable conclusion hardly avoid them. The victims of this criminal action, the Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. using different amounts of money which were requested, informed. In one case, there were relatively small (a few thousand EURO), in another case it has to deliver significant amounts (around few million EURO). Additionally turned to Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. Companies which have not yet GOMOPA the “fee” on out and have already considered whether they should do or not. These firms anticipated by Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. a clear opinion as well as a practical professional advice on how to be in such a situation should behave and how they can avoid debt. The Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. has invariably victims of all crimes, which are at our company have made a cooperation proposed. The top task is to this cooperation, jointly determined and effective measures against GOMOPA against other services in the network, and against all Bloggers to meet in the here described with international criminal procedure GOMOPA leaders to participate. All these companies were known as the Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. proposed “crusade” against GOMOPA, his partner. At our request to notify all participating companies the INTERPOL International Police and their pursuit of domestic institutions, including the competent public prosecutor and the police authorities about the existing situation. In view of the fact that the criminal act of GOMOPA be extended over many states and that the number of the Federal Republic of Germany because the ads reimbursed by GOMOPA, Internet Services and Bloggers crimes, grew up fast – which no doubt influenced by a far-reaching impact of criminal of GOMOPA testifies – International Business, the Police INTERPOL Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. before that its representatives in Berlin with representatives from GOMOPA true to the “payment arrangements and transfer the sum of EUR 5,000,000.00 to discuss. This step meant a well thought-out and by the Federal Criminal Police organized the event to carry out aimed at the arrest of international criminals GOMOPA acting was. The coordinated steps and measures of Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. Damaged and others, led by the International Economic Police INTERPOL, the Federal Criminal Police Office and the Prosecutor of the Federal Republic of Germany for education, training and implementation of the above-described case contributed. In November 2008, the event in Berlin prepared for the apprehension and arrest of the representative of the GOMOPA, after the arrest of Mr. Klaus Mauri chat – as the main leaders and leaders of international criminal group GOMOPA recalled. The arrest and notified the Federal Criminal Police showed both the current whereabouts of Mr. Klaus Mauri chat. “Brain” and the founder of this international criminal group GOMOPA, Mr Klaus Mauri chat on the same day was also arrested and imprisoned on time, will soon put in charge state, the responsibility for their own crimes and those of the forum, before a competent GOMOPA Federal wear. The Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. undertook all possible steps to ensure that Mr. Klaus Mauri chatting on the dock of the competent court of the United Kingdom of Great Britain appears. Among the damaged work and justice people from United Kingdom, along with the Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. There are many victims of GOMOPA: The beginning of the arrests with such a scale means for the German judiciary and a major breakthrough point. It is worth noting that the prosecution bodies of the Federal Republic, up to this stage of the long-standing criminal activity of Mr. Klaus Mauri chatting and his staff were powerless. Prolonged impunity of the criminal actions of Mr. Klaus Mauri chat, for years the “first violin” in GOMOPA played, is to end gegangen.An this point another question arises: how is it so go on? The arrest of Mr. Klaus chat Mauri is a critical moment, in other words a “turn around 180 degrees” for him personally. But it also means the beginning of the end “for its employees, for Internet Services, Bloggers, with GOMOPA so happy and had worked together without contradiction. There is no doubt that the cause of Mr Klaus Mauri chat at the top of the “iceberg” is. The above-mentioned turning point on this issue will be further arrests and detentions of members GOMOPA bring with them, and all persons from all areas involved in this transnational criminal actions have taken part. For information (reports by the end of December 2008), which of Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. available, the result that the next arrests currently prepared to be associated with the Services GOMOPA cooperating persons. This is to people outside Germany – from where Mr Klaus Mauri chat coming – refer. The details may be at this point in terms of legal and course of the prosecution bodies of the BRG and the Interpol-led investigation can not be betrayed. The Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. currently can only illustrate information from the investigation led the public to the criminal liability not to have this moment wird.In so intense preparations for the arrest of a number of persons outside the Federal Republic of Germany. This applies particularly to countries such as the following: – Russia-Ukraine – Poland – Spain – Mexico – Portugal – Brazil – the United States of America – Canada – UK – Ireland – Australia – New Zealand – India. All professional and judicial persons, regardless of the country in which they accompany the Office, or its citizens, and until now, consciously or unconsciously with the Forum GOMOPA together, or continue to work together to arouse the suspicion of the INTERPOL International Police. This works with the police criminal investigation department in each country, to the above persons first identify and then to legally pursue them. Information about this topic, as well as on the beginning and end of the activity of the GOMOPA can be at the following addresses on the Web at: http://gomopaabzocker.wordpress.com/http://www.nepper-schlepper-bauernfaenger.comhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qNpzAu-QMuEhttp://www.korte.de/alexander/2006/01/gomopa-finanforum-kritik.html- http://evelux.de/gomopa-sam-240/- http://blog.deobald.org/archive/2007/07/01/betrugsvorwurf-gomopa-spam/ 2. Dubai KLP Group Emirates – United Arab Emirates. As head of the company is Mr Martin Kraeter, not only as the “brain” of the whole company, but also as a longstanding friend of Mr Klaus Mauri Chat (GOMOPA-wire) acts. This company wants to hide and not even officially exist, that they as a strategic partner of the GOMOPA in the area of the Middle East, according to the territory of the Persian coast operates. Official activities of the company KLP Group Emirates includes among others the following areas: financial advisory services from the offshore area (Management Services – Facilitators – OffshoreConsultants, International Tax & Legal Consultants – Fiduciaries). In the sphere of activities of the Company will include the creation of companies and enterprises in the so-called “tax havens” to the tax liability to the company activity entfliehen.Inoffizielle KLP Group Emirates includes cooperation with the Service GOMOPA in the field of “Gelwäsche”. The monies are a result of criminal activity by GOMOPA generated by advanced professional and judicial persons soon throughout the world and legalized. The illegality based on the activity of the company KLP Group Emirates, as well as the cooperation with the Services GOMOPA attracted attention even when the prosecution organs of the United Kingdom of Great Britain, especially in Scotland Yard, which on this issue an intensive investigation has begun, which is in the ” development phase is located. It must be noted that all professional and judicial persons, but especially the clients of the company KLP Group Emirates, with the company KLP Group Emirates have cooperated in the past and still do, under the “Lupp” of Scotland Yard to be .3. Russlanda) The Company E-XECUTIVE by the Lord led Novosartow Vilen. On the homepage of the Company contained information comes directly from the company GOMOPA. The company e XECUTIVE leads the close cooperation not only with GOMOPA, but also with another on the Russian territory under the name of OOO UK broker functioning company. The company e XECUTIVE in connection with the company OOO UK broker is a member of a criminal group led by GOMOPA. The company e XECUTIVE GOMOPA representing interests in Russia and Central-Eastern Europe. Unofficially, the company employs E XECUTIVE-especially with the search for potential “victims” of the Erschwindelns, blackmail and forcing the funds for GOMOPA companies and corporations from the territory of Russia, Ukraine, and from all countries in Central Eastern Europe. Officially, the company e XECUTIVE one to the forum GOMOPA similar industrial activity. b) OOO “UK broker.” Head of the firm is Mr. Pavel Kokarev. This company is not concealed, that they are consistent with the Forum GOMOPA cooperates. The company OOO UK broker represents GOMOPA in Central Eastern Europe, including Russia. You shall be officially transferred to this area the GOMOPA similar activity, but unofficially it is to search for potential “victims” of racketeering, fraud and Erschwindelns for GOMOPA employed. The company has remained until now spared from any punishment, it could with “eternal impunity” because of a poorly developed, corrupt legal system in Russia expected. The situation may change after Mr. Klaus Mauri Chat arrested in Berlin and was arrested. This constant offenders, the “on his account” a set of legally enforceable judgments has, until now his freedom has unlimited recover, the do not know quite what it means to be arrested, begins gradually, according to our available information to finally “to bear witness.” This is understandable when one considers the threat of a penalty he considered. This delinquent shows growing interest in cooperation with the German tracking and identifying bodies. So there is a chance that other people he unveiled to the public by providing for reduction of prison sentence counts. It is also the only question of time INTERPOL, in cooperation with the Russian Service (FSB) of the Company OOO UK broker “at the door knocking”, which by Mr. Pavle Kokarev and represented. The company OOO UK broker has a virtual office in REGUS building in Moscow, is not even a person, forming a typical one-person company, which all business “crimes” may be the name of it, with no civil liability to pay. The Lord Pavel Kokarev seems to have forgotten or do not have sufficient knowledge about its possible responsibility fier to participate in the international crimes under the direction of Gomopa.

“The Other GoMoPa” – The Original Meridian Capital Press Release

Dear Readers,

here is on your request the Original Meridian Capital Document:

http://othergomopa.blogspot.com/

Saturday, July 11, 2009

KLAUS DIETER MAURISCHAT IN DETENTION

Source: http://klaus-dieter-maurischat.blogspot.com/2009/01/klaus-dieter-maurischat-in-haft.html
KLAUS DIETER MAURISCHAT IN HAFT — DownloadGerman VersionHere is a Google Translation (German -> English)Sunday 18 Januar 2009 January 2009

KLAUS DIETER MAURISCHAT IN DETENTIONMeridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. unveils new criminal phenomena in network I. SachverhaltIn recently appeared on the net more often at the same time a new a very worrying phenomenon of criminal nature. Professional criminals groups in the network are taking part, to extortion, fraud, Erschwindeln relating to certain specifically selected companies and businesses are capable of. These criminals developed new methods and means, simply and in a short time to bereichern.Strategien and manifestations, which underlie this process are fairly simple. A criminal is looking to “carefully” on the Internet specific companies and corporations (victims of crime) and informed them in the next step, that of the business activities of such companies and corporations in the near future – first on the Internet then in other available mass media – numerous and very unfavorable information appears. At the same time, the criminals beat their future victims an effective means of reducing unnecessary difficulties and problems to escape the loss of good name and image of the company and corporate sector. These offenders are aware of that reputation, name and appearance of each company is a value in itself. It was therefore a value of what each company is prepared to pay any price. But the reason for difficulties and problems arising from the loss of good name and reputation result. The criminals and their victims are already aware that this loss is devastating consequences might have been the closing down of a particular business can enforce. It takes both to No as well as at large companies regard. The company is concerned that in virtually every industry in each country and cross-border activities sind.Das criminal procedure in the form of a blackmail on money, a fraud is becoming rapidly and globally, ie led cross-border and internationally. Among the victims of extortion, fraud is now looking both at home (domestic) and international corporations, the major emphasis on conservation, keeping and maintaining their reputation in the business according to their credibility lay. The criminals in the network have understood that maintaining an unassailable reputation and name of a company the unique ability to provide fast and easy enrichment forms. The above-mentioned criminal procedure is difficult to track because it is international in nature, and by overlapping or even nonexistent (fictional) professional and judicial persons in various countries and operated company wird.Diese offenders in the network publish it and disseminate false information about your victims on remote servers, which are not uncommon in many exotic countries. There are those countries in which serious gaps in the legal system, investigative and prosecution procedures are visible. As an example, at this point mention India werden. Mit criminals working in the network grid portals known leader of blogs with your seat-consciously or unconsciously, even in highly developed countries. For example, at this point, countries such as Germany, Austria, Switzerland, the United States, Britain, Spain or Portugal are mentioned. The below listed criminals were able to act unpunished today. As a symptom of such action appears here the activity and “effectiveness” of the company GOMOPA, which is on countries such as Germany, Switzerland, Austria, the United States, Britain, Spain and India. A good example of such an action is Mr. Klaus Mauri Chat – the leader and “brain” of the company GOMOPA with many already in force and criminal judgments “on his account”, which in this way for years and funded its maintenance in the industry almost unlimited activity. This status will change dramatically, however, including far and wide thanks to discontinued operations of the firm Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. who would oppose such offenses addressed in the network. Other companies and corporations, in which the crime network and outside of this medium have fallen victim to contribute to combating such crimes bei.Die situation is changing, thanks to effective steps and the successful cooperation of the firm Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. with the international police Interpol, with the federal agency (FBI) in the U.S., the Federal Criminal Police in Germany, with Scotland Yard in Britain, as well as with the Russian secret service FSB.Die Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. – Together with other companies and cooperations, the victim of criminal activities of the network of crime have fallen – has undeniably already started to yield results. The fact that in recent weeks (November 2008) on the territory of the Federal Republic of Germany of the above-mentioned leaders and “brain” of the company GOMOPA, Mr Klaus Maurishat was arrested should not be ignored. The Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. information available results clearly show that the next arrests of persons participating in this process in such countries as: Austria, Switzerland, Russia, Ukraine, Poland, Spain, Mexico, Portugal, Brazil, the USA, Canada, UK, Ireland , Australia, New Zealand and made in a.. The ultimate goal of Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. and the other victims of crime in the network is to provide all participants in this criminal procedure before the competent court to lead. All professional and judicial persons, regardless of the seat and out of the business, which the above-described criminal action (fraud, extortion) to have fallen victim can of Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. led company to join the goal set at all at this point the procedure described those associated in the public and the economic life out. II blacklist blackmail and with international fraudsters and their methods (opus operandi) in the following countries: 1 The Federal Republic Deutschland2. Dubai 3rd Russia 1st The Federal Republic of Germany GmbH GOMOPA, Goldman Morgenstern & Partners LLC., Goldman Morgenstern & Partners Consulting LLC, Wottle collection. In these firms are quite active following persons: – Klaus Mauri Chat ( “Father” and “brain” of the criminal organization responsible for countless final judgments have been achieved (arrested in Germany in November 2008) – Josef Rudolf Heckel ( “right hand “when Mr Klaus Mauri chat, denounced former banker who is excessive in many Bankschmuggeleien was involved.(Today, persona non grata in the German banking industry); – Peter Reski (responsible for Finance, known for fraud, tax fraud and embezzlement, which is already behind the judgments are final) – Mark Vornkahl (responsible for organizational and administrative tasks in GOMOPA, a former police officer dismissed because of numerous expectations in the service, already has a few final judgments “on his account”); – Claus i Ulrike Wottle (married couple, for the so-called “unconventional” enforcement of the debt for the benefit GOMOPA. This execution was imposing, with extortion violence based on both real and fictitious debts references? How does the system of GOMOPADie above-mentioned persons in Brief, as well as with the service GOMOPA cooperating, so-called “experts GOMOPA” Bloggers and all other professional and legal persons choose from all possible sources of information about large, rich companies and corporations coming in various domestic and international sectors of the economy. GOMOPA The service is particularly keen that those aussucht, the “in itself visible.” Those companies corporations and, therefore, against the relatively easy and without much effort himself, inconsistencies, etc. can be done in terms of the even crimes such as cheating and Erschwindeln Others can easily perform. It is well known that every company especially good at their presence and her name is inviolable. Each company will do everything according to their good presence also retain its credibility to be. But if the victim of GOMOPA and his “partner” and a large range of businesses, so it is possible to call such companies a quick, easy, and even considerably enriched. It appears at this point the question: Which clever criminals in the network and outside the network to me is success, it does not wish to benefit? The criminals in the network know that without business credibility there is no confidence that any business is essential. GOMOPA and all are cooperating with the security of all possible methods and measures mastered how to credibility and confidence of a company, a company, corporation (crime victims) in question. This moves just the attention of the user, so that the homepage of the GOMOPA http://www.gomopa.net in search engines like Google, Yahoo is easy to find. This, in turn, means nothing other than additional profits for the service GOMOPA because of its activity around a media discourse created wird.Ein at first glance commonplace and easy victims of extortion, for example, can a public governmental body, which, based on the credibility of public works, such as a bank or a foreign bank financial institution. So it was with the foreign banks, international financial institution Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. the case. A simple and easy victims of illicit profits and material may include insurance companies, where – as it is from our search results, much to the criminal activities of the GOMOPA especially in the area of the Federal Republic of Germany, Switzerland and Austria was due. Among the known and identifiable victims is certainly German, Austrian and Swiss banks, insurance companies such as Allianz of Germany, German and Austrian companies such as HDI and DKV visible. This is what the service GOMOPA trust and what with the cooperating services, blogs nowadays practice is the so-called cyber-stalking, which rapidly spread in the network. The method is criminal at this point and others in the threat that the business of an enterprise (Ofer blackmail, threats and forcible ) fictitious, even non-existent information (lies, rumors, stories, statements, insults) on the net first then in other mass media. This is only used to a potential victim to move a considerable sum of money for the so-called “peace “the blackmailer available. The” quiet “here means the promise of access lock with respect to the fictitious publication of any information on the net and in all other mass media, the victims of extortion in extremely negative light showing. Such threats are, as already above the goal of companies – potential victims of cyber-stalking to do likewise, that they themselves “buy.” In short, GOMOPA and his peers, and cooperating with those services, and blogs, create a “virtual reality”, or otherwise said publishing fictitious information on potential victims of a crime. firms and corporations, against which threats and extortion by GOMOPA are not due, ie those who for so-called “peace” does not want to pay, to be victims of serious lies, insults, and Insinuationen other criminal misappropriations, the appearance and presence of a firm with certainty. One is a target of GOMOPA, namely as fast and as easy as it goes, money abzukassieren, and if a company refuses, and the “peace” do not buy wishes, it is unexpectedly and quickly become an object of extortion and defamation on the net. At this point the following question arises: How is it possible that the leader of the firm GOMOPA, Mr Klaus Mauri chat, only in the Federal Republic of Germany on his account “23 court rulings, has for many years as an honest citizen to create, while other persons, firms, corporations criminal acts, offenses memorize, in addition to substantial sums of money could earn? This complex process can only be explained as follows: GOMOPA creates his appearance, his presence in the eyes of public opinion as an honest subject, against which pathological phenomena in the public and economic life einschreitet. GOMOPA and his partner (services, blogs) present themselves as followers of any Verbrechensart that promise so the fight against criminals in each virtual network ( especially against any cheaters, blackmailers). GOMOPA used in this respect a kind of “Merketingsvorhang” as a method of seduction, a result which is his true “face” and his true intentions than that of a fraudster and blackmail on money can hide. The true intentions of the GOMOPA, of working together GOMOPA Services and blogs were until today no doubt with success before the public opinion will remain hidden, especially thanks to the so-called “smoke curtain”, which reflects the fact that man himself as a “winner” of any abuse and any pathological appearance of the public and economic life in Aland German, Austria, Switzerland, the United States, Britain, Russia, Spain created. Next appears the GOMOPA forward by the person on which companies and corporations – the future victims of the crime that is – against the possibility of the release of extremely poor and the company concerned in a negative light visual information on the Internet and other mass media warns. The person from whom the speech is also informed that they are successful against such a procedure for a “fee” can be used. The GOMOPA is at this point up to the extortion of money for so-called “peace” to the company and corporation (the victim of a crime) around. Most of the companies concerned to such threats did not respond, because it’s everyday life and their agenda. It finally barely missing on the web of blackmail and outside of the medium. Normally so seldom so-called “understanding”, while on the one hand, the crime victim, on the other hand, the GOMOPA occurs. It is understandable that the price for such an “understanding” means the provision of the requested funds would GOMOPA. The financial blackmail in this stage is rarely enforced. The situation changes little, however, if the firms and corporations (crime victims) find that the threat was fulfilled. In Brief will appear on the homepage http://www.gomopa.net numerous newspaper articles, reports and bogus pseudo market analysis, both by GOMOPA as well as so-called “independent experts” and the company will be represented, with formal or fictitious GOMOPA together. Information published here, correspond to the contents of a threat and make the operations of firms and corporations in an extremely negative light dar. There is no doubt that such actions and methods only to harm the good name and good presence of these firms and corporations prerogatives. The activity of GOMOPA is certainly not exhausted. GOMOPA disseminated (published accommodates) the above information in the network by the credible, and popular opinion-operated services. Moreover, GOMOPA threatens the companies and corporations (its victims), that “from the finger-drawn” information not only on the network, but also on television and on radio and in the press landscape erscheinen.Wie the experience and expertise of the former Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. show that the services are usually not aware that they are for the purpose of a criminal action by the GOMOPA used. They agree with the corresponding fictitious publications, reports and analysis on what specifically GOMOPA through and through “independent” experts are prepared. It also states that the services, and blogs such cooperation with the GOMOPA approval, although they know that the information transmitted by GOMOPA are fictitious and the credibility of companies and corporations affect. They take so aware of the criminal procedure part. The explanation of this situation is quite simple. GOMOPA pays namely the services, and blogs related remuneration that the publication of false information on the companies and corporations (crime victims) agree. Some services, and blogs seem to know nothing about it to have that on their pages available information “fictitious” and “pulled out of the fingers are. Are you looking for in this way their conduct to justify, because they want the legal consequences of participating in the abuse of the good name and appearance of a company or corporation to escape. The activity system of GOMOPA of collaborating services and blogs was also the example of Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. tested. Beginning in October 2008 was one of the workers of Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. a message from an anonymous sender, in the near future – first on the Internet, then on television, radio and in the German press – information published by the functioning and activities of Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. in an extremely negative light show. The employee of Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. was then informed that these reports / news undoubtedly significantly the appearance and the reputation of the firm Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. affect. The place mentioned in this “conversation partner” has the workers of Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. informed that the possibility of the embarrassing situation to be avoided by Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. to the person shown by the account the sum of 100,000.00 EUR transfers. As later revealed, however, was Mr. Klaus Mauri Chat – this anonymous interlocutor – “brain” and “Leader of the GOMOPA”. The investigations have been employed by the Federal Judicial Police (tracking and identifying the body at the federal level) during the investigation for the payment of blackmail, fraud and threats because of what Mr Mauri chatting and his staff were practiced, and for participation by other (head of Internet services and moderators of blogs) on this process. These crimes have been committed to loss of many professional and judicial persons, including the Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. The victims of this crime in Germany, Austria, Switzerland, Spain, Portugal, Great Britain, the USA and Canada visible. At this moment appeared the following question: What was the reaction of Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. to the demands from GOMOPA? Corresponded to the response to the expectations of GOMOPA? Has the Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. the required sum of EUR 100,000.00 paid? Side of Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. There was absolutely no reaction to the extortion attempt by GOMOPA. At the end of August 2008 on the Service http://www.gompa.net numerous articles / reports published by the activities of Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. in a very negative light have represented. Once the information contained on http://www.gomopa.net detail and were fully analyzed, it is that they are not even the truth at one point and potential and existing customers of Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. in relation to the financial institution from this discontinued business activities is misleading. Following the criminal Handlugen of GOMOPA and its cooperating services, and blogs on the network, the Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. measurable and significant business losses. The Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. has primarily an important group of potential customers lost. But what it showed as important, the existing customers of Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. little away. Those customers have used our services and continue to use the still. In view of the existing collaboration with the Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.., Which will in turn be no objections. GOMOPA has such a course of events accurately predicted, which aims significant and measurable business by Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. losses were suffered. The course of events, the service GOMOPA certainly pleased. GOMOPA has to expect that the position of Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. declines and the financial institution, the required sum (100.000,00 EUR) provides. Over time, as the whole procedure in the network was becoming more popular, tried GOMOPA still four times to the Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. Contacts, each time by adjusting these criminal “Kompanie” has promised, although it every time his financial demands heraufsetzte. The last of the set of “company” against Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. ratio was even planned EUR 5,000,000.00 (in words: EURO fünfmilionen). The Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. could but before the ever-increasing demands from the Service GOMOPA claim. In October 2008 met the management of Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. Decision on the notification of the INTERPOL International Police and the appropriate law enforcement institutions of the FRG (the police and the prosecutor) about the existing situation. In the meantime, reported at the Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. numerous companies and corporations, and even professional person such as doctors, judges, priests, actors and other people from different countries of the world, the extortion of GOMOPA relented and the required amounts of money it had. These people already gave statements that they have done so, so they finally just “be in peace” and unnecessary problems, difficulties, and a reasonable conclusion hardly avoid them. The victims of this criminal action, the Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. using different amounts of money which were requested, informed. In one case, there were relatively small (a few thousand EURO), in another case it has to deliver significant amounts (around few million EURO). Additionally turned to Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. Companies which have not yet GOMOPA the “fee” on out and have already considered whether they should do or not. These firms anticipated by Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. a clear opinion as well as a practical professional advice on how to be in such a situation should behave and how they can avoid debt. The Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. has invariably victims of all crimes, which are at our company have made a cooperation proposed. The top task is to this cooperation, jointly determined and effective measures against GOMOPA against other services in the network, and against all Bloggers to meet in the here described with international criminal procedure GOMOPA leaders to participate. All these companies were known as the Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. proposed “crusade” against GOMOPA, his partner. At our request to notify all participating companies the INTERPOL International Police and their pursuit of domestic institutions, including the competent public prosecutor and the police authorities about the existing situation. In view of the fact that the criminal act of GOMOPA be extended over many states and that the number of the Federal Republic of Germany because the ads reimbursed by GOMOPA, Internet Services and Bloggers crimes, grew up fast – which no doubt influenced by a far-reaching impact of criminal of GOMOPA testifies – International Business, the Police INTERPOL Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. before that its representatives in Berlin with representatives from GOMOPA true to the “payment arrangements and transfer the sum of EUR 5,000,000.00 to discuss. This step meant a well thought-out and by the Federal Criminal Police organized the event to carry out aimed at the arrest of international criminals GOMOPA acting was. The coordinated steps and measures of Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. Damaged and others, led by the International Economic Police INTERPOL, the Federal Criminal Police Office and the Prosecutor of the Federal Republic of Germany for education, training and implementation of the above-described case contributed. In November 2008, the event in Berlin prepared for the apprehension and arrest of the representative of the GOMOPA, after the arrest of Mr. Klaus Mauri chat – as the main leaders and leaders of international criminal group GOMOPA recalled. The arrest and notified the Federal Criminal Police showed both the current whereabouts of Mr. Klaus Mauri chat. “Brain” and the founder of this international criminal group GOMOPA, Mr Klaus Mauri chat on the same day was also arrested and imprisoned on time, will soon put in charge state, the responsibility for their own crimes and those of the forum, before a competent GOMOPA Federal wear. The Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. undertook all possible steps to ensure that Mr. Klaus Mauri chatting on the dock of the competent court of the United Kingdom of Great Britain appears. Among the damaged work and justice people from United Kingdom, along with the Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. There are many victims of GOMOPA: The beginning of the arrests with such a scale means for the German judiciary and a major breakthrough point. It is worth noting that the prosecution bodies of the Federal Republic, up to this stage of the long-standing criminal activity of Mr. Klaus Mauri chatting and his staff were powerless. Prolonged impunity of the criminal actions of Mr. Klaus Mauri chat, for years the “first violin” in GOMOPA played, is to end gegangen.An this point another question arises: how is it so go on? The arrest of Mr. Klaus chat Mauri is a critical moment, in other words a “turn around 180 degrees” for him personally. But it also means the beginning of the end “for its employees, for Internet Services, Bloggers, with GOMOPA so happy and had worked together without contradiction. There is no doubt that the cause of Mr Klaus Mauri chat at the top of the “iceberg” is. The above-mentioned turning point on this issue will be further arrests and detentions of members GOMOPA bring with them, and all persons from all areas involved in this transnational criminal actions have taken part. For information (reports by the end of December 2008), which of Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. available, the result that the next arrests currently prepared to be associated with the Services GOMOPA cooperating persons. This is to people outside Germany – from where Mr Klaus Mauri chat coming – refer. The details may be at this point in terms of legal and course of the prosecution bodies of the BRG and the Interpol-led investigation can not be betrayed. The Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. currently can only illustrate information from the investigation led the public to the criminal liability not to have this moment wird.In so intense preparations for the arrest of a number of persons outside the Federal Republic of Germany. This applies particularly to countries such as the following: – Russia-Ukraine – Poland – Spain – Mexico – Portugal – Brazil – the United States of America – Canada – UK – Ireland – Australia – New Zealand – India. All professional and judicial persons, regardless of the country in which they accompany the Office, or its citizens, and until now, consciously or unconsciously with the Forum GOMOPA together, or continue to work together to arouse the suspicion of the INTERPOL International Police. This works with the police criminal investigation department in each country, to the above persons first identify and then to legally pursue them. Information about this topic, as well as on the beginning and end of the activity of the GOMOPA can be at the following addresses on the Web at: http://gomopaabzocker.wordpress.com/http://www.nepper-schlepper-bauernfaenger.comhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qNpzAu-QMuEhttp://www.korte.de/alexander/2006/01/gomopa-finanforum-kritik.html- http://evelux.de/gomopa-sam-240/- http://blog.deobald.org/archive/2007/07/01/betrugsvorwurf-gomopa-spam/ 2. Dubai KLP Group Emirates – United Arab Emirates. As head of the company is Mr Martin Kraeter, not only as the “brain” of the whole company, but also as a longstanding friend of Mr Klaus Mauri Chat (GOMOPA-wire) acts. This company wants to hide and not even officially exist, that they as a strategic partner of the GOMOPA in the area of the Middle East, according to the territory of the Persian coast operates. Official activities of the company KLP Group Emirates includes among others the following areas: financial advisory services from the offshore area (Management Services – Facilitators – OffshoreConsultants, International Tax & Legal Consultants – Fiduciaries). In the sphere of activities of the Company will include the creation of companies and enterprises in the so-called “tax havens” to the tax liability to the company activity entfliehen.Inoffizielle KLP Group Emirates includes cooperation with the Service GOMOPA in the field of “Gelwäsche”. The monies are a result of criminal activity by GOMOPA generated by advanced professional and judicial persons soon throughout the world and legalized. The illegality based on the activity of the company KLP Group Emirates, as well as the cooperation with the Services GOMOPA attracted attention even when the prosecution organs of the United Kingdom of Great Britain, especially in Scotland Yard, which on this issue an intensive investigation has begun, which is in the ” development phase is located. It must be noted that all professional and judicial persons, but especially the clients of the company KLP Group Emirates, with the company KLP Group Emirates have cooperated in the past and still do, under the “Lupp” of Scotland Yard to be .3. Russlanda) The Company E-XECUTIVE by the Lord led Novosartow Vilen. On the homepage of the Company contained information comes directly from the company GOMOPA. The company e XECUTIVE leads the close cooperation not only with GOMOPA, but also with another on the Russian territory under the name of OOO UK broker functioning company. The company e XECUTIVE in connection with the company OOO UK broker is a member of a criminal group led by GOMOPA. The company e XECUTIVE GOMOPA representing interests in Russia and Central-Eastern Europe. Unofficially, the company employs E XECUTIVE-especially with the search for potential “victims” of the Erschwindelns, blackmail and forcing the funds for GOMOPA companies and corporations from the territory of Russia, Ukraine, and from all countries in Central Eastern Europe. Officially, the company e XECUTIVE one to the forum GOMOPA similar industrial activity. b) OOO “UK broker.” Head of the firm is Mr. Pavel Kokarev. This company is not concealed, that they are consistent with the Forum GOMOPA cooperates. The company OOO UK broker represents GOMOPA in Central Eastern Europe, including Russia. You shall be officially transferred to this area the GOMOPA similar activity, but unofficially it is to search for potential “victims” of racketeering, fraud and Erschwindelns for GOMOPA employed. The company has remained until now spared from any punishment, it could with “eternal impunity” because of a poorly developed, corrupt legal system in Russia expected. The situation may change after Mr. Klaus Mauri Chat arrested in Berlin and was arrested. This constant offenders, the “on his account” a set of legally enforceable judgments has, until now his freedom has unlimited recover, the do not know quite what it means to be arrested, begins gradually, according to our available information to finally “to bear witness.” This is understandable when one considers the threat of a penalty he considered. This delinquent shows growing interest in cooperation with the German tracking and identifying bodies. So there is a chance that other people he unveiled to the public by providing for reduction of prison sentence counts. It is also the only question of time INTERPOL, in cooperation with the Russian Service (FSB) of the Company OOO UK broker “at the door knocking”, which by Mr. Pavle Kokarev and represented. The company OOO UK broker has a virtual office in REGUS building in Moscow, is not even a person, forming a typical one-person company, which all business “crimes” may be the name of it, with no civil liability to pay. The Lord Pavel Kokarev seems to have forgotten or do not have sufficient knowledge about its possible responsibility fier to participate in the international crimes under the direction of Gomopa.

Wer erschoss den Treuhandchef Rohwedder? 1/5

Wer erschoss den Treuhandchef Rohwedder? 2/5

Wer erschoss den Treuhandchef Rohwedder? 3/5

Wer erschoss den Treuhandchef Rohwedder? 4/5

Wer erschoss den Treuhandchef Rohwedder? 5/5

TOP-SECRET: FBI FILES ABOUT THE MURDER OF MARTIN LUTHER KING

Martin Luther King, Jr., a prominent American leader of the African-American civil rights movement and Nobel Peace Prize laureate, was assassinated at the Lorraine Motel in Memphis, Tennessee, on April 4, 1968, at the age of 39. On June 10, 1968, James Earl Ray, a fugitive from the Missouri State Penitentiary, was arrested in London at Heathrow Airport, extradited to the United States, and charged with the crime. On March 10, 1969, Ray entered a plea of guilty and was sentenced to 99 years in the Tennessee state penitentiary.[1] Ray later made many attempts to withdraw his guilty plea and be tried by a jury, but was unsuccessful; he died in prison on April 23, 1998, at the age of 70.

Click for download the file below

mkl1a

mlk1b

Der Fall Rohwedder

IMMOVATION AG WEHRT SICH GEGEN DIE KRIMINELLEN DER STASI-“GoMoPa”

Liebe Leser,

nachfolgender Link verweist auf den Blog der Kasseler Immobilienfirma Immovation, die sich in 2010 erfolgreich gegen die STASI-Kriminellen des frei erfundenen, selbst ernannten,  “Finanznachrichtendienstes “GoMoPa” durchsetzten – vor deutschen Gerichten.

Dies wird aber nach der Wirecard-Affäre, die von “GoMoPa” mitverantwortet wird und in deren Zuge über 200 Millionen Euro Anlegergelder über Nacht vernichtet wurden und die Enttarnung der “GoMoPa” als kriminelle STASI-Nachfolgeorganisation immer schwerer, da es sie “offiziell” in Deutschland nicht gibt und in der Berlin- Brandenburger Justiz und Exekutive über 20% ehemalige STASI- und DDR-Mitarbeiter sitzen.

Entscheidend ist, das das Landeskriminalamt Bayern wegen der Wirecard-Affäre weiter gegen “GoMoPa” und deren kriminelle Hintermänner ermittelt sowie weitere Dinge in Bewegung sind, über die ich hier und jetzt nichts verlauten lassen kann.

Link

http://blog.immovation-ag.de/

Herzlichst Ihr

Bernd Pulch, Magister Artium der Publizistik, Germanistik und Komparatistik.

Dear Readers,

following link points to the blog of Kassel Immovation real estate company, who in 2010 successfully against the Secret Police of the criminals freely invented, self-proclaimed, “Finanznachrichtendienstes” GoMoPa “permeated – in German courts.

However, this is for the Wire Card affair that cas co-created by “GoMoPa” and in the course of this affair  than 200 million euros of  investors’ money vanished over night and the unmasking of the “GoMoPa” as a criminal STASI successor makes it now more difficult, because there they are not “officially” located in Germany and by also by the fact that the Berlin-Brandenburg judiciary and the executive has over 20% former Stasi and GDR-employees.

Therefore it is crucial that the Bavarian State Criminal Police Office continues to investigate against  “GoMoPa” and their criminal backers, as well as other things are determined on the move, about which can not be announced here today

link

http://blog.immovation-ag.de/

Sincerely,

Bernd Pulch, Master of Arts in journalism, comparative literature and Germanic.

TOP SECRET: The Reykjavik File

President Reagan greets Soviet General Secretary Gorbachev at Hofdi House during the Reykjavik Summit, Iceland (Source: Ronald Reagan Presidential Library) [Click image for larger version.]

Previously Secret Documents from U.S. and Soviet Archives on the 1986 Reagan-Gorbachev Summit

Washington, D.C. and Reykjavik, Iceland – President Ronald Reagan and Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev almost achieved a deal 20 years ago at the 1986 Reykjavik summit to abolish nuclear weapons, but the agreement would have required “an exceptional level of trust” that neither side had yet developed, according to previously secret U.S. and Soviet documents posted today on the Web by the National Security Archive of George Washington University and presented on October 12 in Reykjavik directly to Gorbachev and the president of Iceland.

The two leaders in conversation at Hofdi House, 11 October 1986 (Source: Ronald Reagan Presidential Library) [Click image for larger version.]

The documents include Gorbachev’s initial letter to Reagan from 15 September 1986 asking for “a quick one-on-one meeting, let us say in Iceland or in London,” newly translated Gorbachev discussions with his aides and with the Politburo preparing for the meeting, U.S. Secretary of State George Shultz’s briefing book for the summit, the complete U.S. and Soviet transcripts of the Reykjavik summit, and the internal recriminations and reflections by both sides after the meeting failed to reach agreement.

Archive director Thomas Blanton, Archive director of Russia programs Dr. Svetlana Savranskaya, and Pulitzer-Prize-winning biographer Dr. William Taubman presented the documents to Gorbachev at a state dinner in the residence of President Olafur Ragnar Grimsson of Iceland on October 12 marking the 20th anniversary of the summit, which Grimsson commented had put Iceland on the map as a meeting place for international dialogue.

The documents show that U.S. analysis of Gorbachev’s goals for the summit completely missed the Soviet leader’s emphasis on “liquidation” of nuclear weapons, a dream Gorbachev shared with Reagan and which the two leaders turned to repeatedly during the intense discussions at Reykjavik in October 1986. But the epitaph for the summit came from Soviet aide Gyorgy Arbatov, who at one point during staff discussions told U.S. official Paul Nitze that the U.S. proposals (continued testing of missile defenses in the Strategic Defense Initiative or SDI while proceeding over 10 years to eliminate all ballistic missiles, leading to the ultimate abolition of all offensive nuclear weapons) would require “an exceptional level of trust” and therefore “we cannot accept your position.”

Gorbachev and Reagan during a one-on-one session at Hofdi House. U.S. Ambassador Jack Matlock is seated to Reagan’s left. (Source: Ronald Reagan Presidential Library) [Click image for larger version.]

Politburo notes from October 30, two weeks after the summit, show that Gorbachev by then had largely accepted Reagan’s formulation for further SDI research, but by that point it was too late for a deal. The Iran-Contra scandal was about to break, causing Reagan’s approval ratings to plummet and removing key Reagan aides like national security adviser John Poindexter, whose replacement was not interested in the ambitious nuclear abolition dreams the two leaders shared at Reykjavik. The documents show that even the more limited notion of abolishing ballistic missiles foundered on opposition from the U.S. military which presented huge estimates of needed additional conventional spending to make up for not having the missiles.

The U.S. documents were obtained by the Archive through Freedom of Information Act requests to the Ronald Reagan Presidential Library and the U.S. Department of State. The Soviet documents came to the Archive courtesy of top Gorbachev aide Anatoly Sergeyevich Chernyaev, who has donated his diary and notes of Politburo and other Gorbachev discussions to the Archive, and from the Volkogonov collection of the U.S. Library of Congress.


Reagan and Gorbachev following a final, unscheduled session held in hopes of reaching agreement, 12 October 1986. Soviet Ambassador Anatoly Dobrynin (center) and Foreign Minister Eduard Shevardnadze (far right) look on. (Source: Ronald Reagan Presidential Library) [Click image for larger version.]

The Reykjavik File: Previously Secret U.S. and Soviet Documents on the 1986 Reagan-Gorbachev SummitFrom the Collections of the National Security Archive, George Washington University, Washington, D.C., October 2006

[The U.S. documents were obtained by the Archive through Freedom of Information Act requests and Mandatory Declassification Review Requests to the Ronald Reagan Presidential Library and the U.S. Department of State. The Soviet documents came to the Archive courtesy of top Gorbachev aide Anatoly Sergeyevich Chernyaev, who has donated his diary and notes of Politburo and other Gorbachev discussions to the Archive, and from the Volkogonov collection of the U.S. Library of Congress.]

Note: The documents cited in this Electronic Briefing Book are in PDF format. You will need to download and install the free Adobe Acrobat Reader to view.

Document 1: “Dear Mr. President,” Mikhail Gorbachev letter to Ronald Reagan, 15 September 1986 (unofficial translation with signed Russian original, proposing “a quick one-on-one meeting, let us say in Iceland or in London”), 6 pp. with 4 pp. Russian original

This letter, carried by Soviet foreign minister Eduard Shevardnadze to Washington, initiated the Reykjavik summit meeting when Gorbachev proposed “a quick one-on-one meeting, let us say in Iceland or in London,” in order to break out of the cycle of spy-versus-spy posturing and inconclusive diplomatic negotiations after the 1985 Geneva summit. The English translation includes underlining by Reagan himself, who marked the sentence accusing the U.S. of deliberately finding a “pretext” to “aggravate” relations, and the two sentences about making “no start” on implementing the Geneva agreements and not “an inch closer to an agreement on arms reduction.”

Document 2: USSR CC CPSU Politburo discussion of Reagan’s response to Gorbachev’s initiative to meet in Reykjavik and strategic disarmament proposals, 22 September 1986, 2 pp.

Foreign Minister Eduard Shevardnadze reports to the Politburo on his talks in Washington and informs the Soviet leadership about Reagan’s decision to accept Gorbachev’s invitation to meet in Reykjavik on the condition that 25 Soviet dissidents including Yury Orlov and Nicholas Daniloff, accused of spying, are released. Gorbachev accepts the conditions and sets forth his main ideas for the summit. The Soviet position, according to him, should be based on acceptance of U.S. security interests, otherwise negotiations would be unproductive. Gorbachev is aiming at a serious improvement in U.S.-Soviet relations.

Document 3: Gorbachev discussion with assistants on preparations for Reykjavik, 29 September 1986, 1p.

At this Politburo meeting Gorbachev stresses once again the importance of taking U.S. interests into account and the fact that his new policy is creating a positive dynamic for disarmament in Europe. He emphasizes the need for an “offensive” and the active nature of new Soviet initiatives for Reykjavik.

Document 4: Memorandum to the President, Secretary of State George Shultz, “Subject: Reykjavik,” 2 October 1986, 4 pp.

This briefing memo from Shultz to Reagan, labeled “Super Sensitive” as well as formally classified as “Secret/Sensitive,” shows that the U.S. did not expect any actual agreement at Reykjavik, but rather, mere preparations for a future summit in the U.S. Shultz talks here about ceilings on ballistic missiles but fails to predict Gorbachev’s dramatic agreements to 50% cuts and a process leading to the abolition of nuclear weapons. Ironically, Shultz says one of the U.S. goals is to emphasize progress “without permitting the impression that Reykjavik itself was a Summit,” when history now sees Reykjavik as in many ways the most dramatic summit meeting of the Cold War.

Document 5: Gorbachev’s instructions for the group preparing for Reykjavik, 4 October 1986, 5 pp.

Gorbachev explains his top priorities and specific proposals to the group charged with preparing for Reykjavik. He calls for preparing a position with a “breakthrough potential,” which would take into account U.S. interests and put strategic weapons, not issues of nuclear testing, at the forefront. Gorbachev’s ultimate goal for Reykjavik-he reiterates it several times during the meeting-is total liquidation of nuclear weapons based on the Soviet 15 January 1986 Program of Liquidation of Nuclear Weapons by the Year 2000. Whereas Gorbachev sees the value in making concessions in hopes of achieving a breakthrough, his Politburo colleagues (including Chebrikov) warn him against using this word in the negotiations. In the evening Gorbachev gives additional instructions to Chernyaev on human rights and on the matter of Gorbachev’s wife, Raisa Maksimovna, accompanying him to Iceland.

Document 6: “Gorbachev’s Goals and Tactics at Reykjavik,” National Security Council (Stephen Sestanovich), 4 October 1986, 2 pp. (plus cover page from John M. Poindexter [National Security Adviser to the President] to Shultz)

This briefing memo prepared (on the same day as Gorbachev’s Politburo discussion above) by one of the National Security Council’s senior Soviet experts, completely mis-predicts Gorbachev’s behavior at the Reykjavik summit. Far from being “coy” or “undecided” about a future U.S. summit, Gorbachev was already planning major concessions and breakthroughs. Far from having to “smoke” Gorbachev out during the talks, Reagan would be faced with an extraordinarily ambitious set of possible agreements.

Document 7: “The President’s Trip to Reykjavik, Iceland, October 9-12, 1986 – Issues Checklist for the Secretary,” U.S. Department of State, 7 October 1986, 23 pp. (first 2 sections only, Checklist and Walk-through)

This detailed briefing book for Secretary Shultz provides a one-stop-shopping portrait of the state of U.S.-Soviet relations and negotiations on the eve of the Reykjavik summit. The complete table of contents gives the list of briefing papers and backgrounders that are also available in the collections of the National Security Archive (from FOIA requests to the State Department), but posted here are only the first two sections of the briefing book: the “Checklist” of U.S.-Soviet issues, and the “Walk-Through” of subjects for the Reykjavik agenda. Notable is the very first item on the latter, which presupposes that the best they will achieve is some agreement on a number of ballistic missile warheads between the U.S. proposal of 5500 and the Soviet proposal of 6400, rather than the radical cuts that wound up on the table at Reykjavik.

Document 8: USSR CC CPSU Politburo session on preparations for Reykjavik, 8 October 1986, 6 pp.

In this last Politburo session before the delegation departed for Reykjavik, Gorbachev goes over the final details of the Soviet proposals. He allows for the possibility that the meeting could be a failure, and suggests making “concessions on intermediate range missiles,” and French and British nuclear weapons. Gorbachev believes there should be no “intermediate” positions or agreements, driving for his maximum program even if concessions would have to be made. Shevardnadze sounds most optimistic predicting that the U.S. side could agree with the Soviet non-withdrawal period on the Anti-Ballistic Missile (ABM) treaty and on 50% cuts of the nuclear triad (missiles, bombers, submarines) and intermediate-range missiles.

Reagan and Gorbachev depart Hofdi House after the conclusion of the summit, 12 October 1986. (Source: Ronald Reagan Presidential Library) [Click image for larger version.]

Document 9: U.S. Memorandum of Conversation, Reagan-Gorbachev, First Meeting, 11 October 1986, 10:40 a.m. – 12:30 p.m., 8 pp.

Document 10: Russian transcript of Reagan-Gorbachev Summit in Reykjavik, 11 October 1986 (morning), published in FBIS-USR-93-061, 17 May 1993, 5 pp.

Document 11: U.S. Memorandum of Conversation, Reagan-Gorbachev, Second Meeting, 11 October 1986, 3:30 p.m. – 5:40 p.m., 15 pp.

Document 12: Russian transcript of Reagan-Gorbachev Summit in Reykjavik, 11 October 1986 (afternoon), published in FBIS-USR-93-087, 12 July 1993, 6 pp.

Document 13: U.S. Memorandum of Conversation, Reagan-Gorbachev, Third Meeting, 12 October 1986, 10:00 a.m. – 1:35 p.m., 21 pp.

Document 14: Russian transcript of Reagan-Gorbachev Summit in Reykjavik, 12 October 1986 (morning), published in FBIS-USR-93-113, 30 August 1993, 11 pp.

Document 15: U.S. Memorandum of Conversation, Reagan-Gorbachev, Final Meeting, 12 October 1986, 3:25 p.m. – 4:30 p.m. and 5:30 p.m. – 6:50 p.m., 16 pp.

Document 16: Russian transcript of Reagan-Gorbachev Summit in Reykjavik, 12 October 1986 (afternoon), published in FBIS-USR-93-121, 20 September 1993, 7 pp.

This side-by-side presentation of the official U.S. transcripts of the Reykjavik summit meetings and the Soviet transcripts as published in Moscow in 1993 and translated by the U.S. government’s Foreign Broadcast Information Service puts the reader inside the bullet-proof glass over the windows of Hofdi House as Reagan, Gorbachev, their translators, and their foreign ministers discuss radical changes in both U.S. and Soviet national security thinking.

The two sets of transcripts are remarkably congruent, with each version providing slightly different wording and detail but no direct contradictions. Reagan and Gorbachev eloquently express their shared vision of nuclear abolition, and heatedly debate their widely divergent views of missile defenses. For Reagan, SDI was the ultimate insurance policy against a madman blackmailing the world with nuclear-tipped missiles in a future where all the superpowers’ missiles and nuclear weapons had been destroyed. Reagan comes back again and again to the metaphor of keeping your gas masks even after banning chemical weapons, but Gorbachev feels as if Reagan is lecturing him, and says “that’s the 10th time you talked about gas masks.”

For Gorbachev, SDI was a U.S. attempt to take the arms race into space and potentially launch a first-strike attack on the Soviet Union – the ultimate nightmare for Soviet leaders seared into their consciousnesses by Hitler’s blitzkrieg. But Gorbachev’s scientists had already told him that missile defenses could be easily and cheaply countered with multiple warheads and decoys even if the defenses ever worked (which was unlikely).

The great “what if” question suggested by the Reykjavik transcripts is what would have happened if Gorbachev had simply accepted Reagan’s apparently sincere offer to share SDI technology rather than dismissing this as ridiculous when the U.S. would not even share “milking machines.” If Gorbachev had “pocketed” Reagan’s offer, then the pressure would have been on the U.S. to deliver, in the face of a probable firestorm of opposition from the U.S. military and foreign policy establishment. Working in the opposite direction in favor of the deal would have been overwhelming public support for these dramatic changes, both in the U.S. and in the Soviet Union, and especially in Europe.

Perhaps most evocative is the Russian version’s closing words, which are not included in the U.S. transcript. This exchange comes after Reagan asks for a personal “favor” from Gorbachev of accepting the offer on SDI and ABM, and Gorbachev replies by saying this is not a favor but a matter of principle. The U.S. version has Reagan standing at that point to leave the room and a brief polite exchange about regards to Nancy Reagan. But the Russian version has Reagan saying, “I think you didn’t want to achieve an agreement anyway” and “I don’t know when we’ll ever have another chance like this and whether we will meet soon.”

Document 17: Russian transcript of Negotiations in the Working Group on Military Issues, headed by Nitze and Akhromeev, 11-12 October 1986, 52 pp.

In the all-night negotiations of Soviet and U.S. military experts during the middle of the Reykjavik summit, the Soviet delegation led by Marshal Sergei Akhromeev starts from the new Soviet program, just outlined by Gorbachev in his meeting with Reagan earlier in the day-proposing 50% cuts of strategic weapons across the board, a zero option on intermediate-range missiles in Europe, and a 10-year period of non-withdrawal from the ABM treaty. At the same time, the U.S. delegation led by Paul Nitze conducts the discussion practically disregarding the new Soviet proposals and negotiating on the basis of U.S. proposals of 18 January 1986, which by now are overtaken by the latest developments in the Reagan-Gorbachev talks. Responding to U.S. proposals on allowing development of SDI while proceeding with deep cuts in strategic weapons, member of the Soviet delegation Georgy Arbatov comments “what you are offering requires an exceptional level of trust. We cannot accept your position,” directly implying that the necessary level of trust was not there. This document, prepared as a result of the all-night discussion, outlined the disagreements but failed to integrate the understandings achieved by the two leaders on October 11 or approached again on October 12.

Document 18: “Lessons of Reykjavik,” U.S. Department of State, c. 12 October 1986, 1 p. (plus cover sheet from Shultz briefing book for media events October 17, but text seems to have been written on last day of summit, October 12)

This remarkable one-page summary of the summit’s lessons seems to have been written on the last day of Reykjavik, given the mention of “today’s” discussions, but leaves a dramatically positive view of the summit in contrast to the leaders’ faces as they left Hofdi House, as well as to Shultz’s downbeat presentation at the press briefing immediately following the summit. It is unclear who authored this document, although the text says that “I have been pointing out these advantages [of thinking big] in a theoretical sense for some time.” This document plus Gorbachev’s own very positive press briefing commentary immediately following the summit were included in Secretary Shultz’s briefing book for his subsequent media appearances.

Document 19: Gorbachev’s reflections on Reykjavik on the flight to Moscow, 12 October 1986, 2 pp.

In his remarks on the way back from Reykjavik, written down by Chernyaev, Gorbachev gives a very positive assessment of the summit. He proclaims that he is now “even more of an optimist after Reykjavik,” that he understood Reagan’s domestic problems and that the U.S. President was not completely free in making his decisions. He understands Reykjavik as signifying a new stage in the process of disarmament-from limitations to total abolition.

Document 20: “Iceland Chronology,” U.S. Department of State, 14 October 1986, 11 pp.

This blow-by-blow, minute-by-minute chronology sums up not only the discussions given in detail in the transcripts above, but also all the preparatory meetings and discussions and logistics on the U.S. side.

Document 21: USSR CC CPSU Politburo session on results of the Reykjavik Summit, 14 October 1986, 12 pp.

In the first Politburo meeting after Reykjavik, Gorbachev reports on the results, starting with a standard ideological criticism of Reagan as a class enemy who showed “extreme primitivism, a caveman outlook and intellectual impotence.” He goes on, however, to describe the summit as a breakthrough, and the attainment of a new “higher level from which now we have to begin a struggle for liquidation and complete ban on nuclear armaments.” The Politburo agrees with the assessment and approves the General Secretary’s tough posturing.

Document 22: USSR CC CPSU Politburo session on measures in connection with the expulsion of Soviet diplomats from the USA, 22 October 1986, 2 pp.

Reacting to the U.S. decision to expel Soviet diplomats, the Politburo discusses the perceived American retreat from the understandings reached at Reykjavik and decides to press Reagan to follow through with the disarmament agenda on the basis of the summit.

Document 23: USSR CC CPSU Politburo session. Reykjavik assessment and instructions for Soviet delegation for negotiations in Geneva, 30 October 1986, 5 pp.

At this Politburo session Gorbachev and Shevardnadze discuss whether and when to reveal the new Soviet position on SDI testing, which would allow “testing in the air, on the test sites on the ground, but not in space.” This is a significant step in the direction of the U.S. position and is seen as a serious concession on the Soviet part by Foreign Minister Gromyko. Gorbachev is very concerned that the U.S. administration is “perverting and revising Reykjavik, retreating from it.” He places a great deal of hope in Shevardnadze-Shultz talks in terms of returning to and expanding the Reykjavik agenda.

Document 24: Memorandum for the President, John M. Poindexter, “Subject: Guidance for Post-Reykjavik Follow-up Activities,” 1 November 1986, 1 p.

This cover memo describes the process of developing National Security Decision Directive 250 (next document) on Post-Reykjavik follow-up, led by National Security Adviser John Poindexter. The most striking aspect of this memo is Poindexter’s own claim that he has incorporated as much as he can (accounting for the President’s expressed bottom lines) of the Pentagon’s and other objections, and that he needs to brief Reagan about remaining objections on matters that simply would not fit with the President’s program.

Document 25: National Security Decision Directive Number 250, “Post-Reykjavik Follow-Up,” 3 November 1986 (signed by Ronald Reagan), 14 pp.

Largely the work of NSC staffer Robert Linhard, who participated at Reykjavik, NSDD 250 attempts to keep the U.S. national security bureaucracy focused on President Reagan’s goal of eliminating ballistic missiles while walking back from Reagan’s expressed intent at Reykjavik to eliminate all offensive nuclear weapons. In fact, the NSDD’s version of Reykjavik completely leaves out the Reagan and Shultz statements to Gorbachev about welcoming the abolition of nuclear weapons. Yet even this limited effort did not succeed in moving the U.S. bureaucracy towards realistic planning, and in fact the Joint Chiefs of Staff promptly weighed in with National Security Adviser Poindexter to the effect that eliminating missiles would require large increases in conventional military spending.

Document 26: USSR CC CPSU Politburo session. About discussions between Shevardnadze and Shultz in Vienna, 13 November 1986, 3 pp.

Here the Politburo discusses the results of the Shevardnadze-Shultz talks in Geneva, where Shultz refused to discuss new Shevardnadze’s proposals concerning what is allowed and not allowed under the ABM treaty. Shultz’s position notwithstanding, Gorbachev emphasizes the need to press the U.S. to move forward on the basis of Reykjavik. Gorbachev stresses that “we have not yet truly understood what Reykjavik means,” referring to its significance as a new level of disarmament dialogue.

Document 27: Gorbachev Conversation with Chernyaev about Reykjavik, 17 November 1986, 1 p.

In a conversation with Chernyaev, Gorbachev talks about Soviet next steps in countering the U.S. attempts to circumvent Reykjavik. He stresses that “we cannot go below Reykjavik,” and is concerned that “the Americans will not go above Reykjavik.”

Document 28: Gorbachev Conference with Politburo Members and Secretaries of the Central Committee, 1 December 1986, 4 pp.

In a Politburo discussion of the Reagan decision to abandon the SALT II treaty, Gorbachev angrily states that the Americans are not doing anything in the spirit of Reykjavik and that the recent position of the Reagan administration was related to the domestic political crisis over Iran-Contra. Yegor Ligachev agrees with Gorbachev that after Reykjavik the Soviet positions only became stronger. Gorbachev speaks about his awareness of growing opposition to his disarmament proposals among the generals, who are “hissing among themselves.”

Document 29: Meeting with the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Alton G. Keel [Executive Secretary of the National Security Council], 18 December 1986 [for meeting on 19 December to discuss NSDD 250 and other topics], 7 pp. with staff attachments and talking points

This set of documents demonstrates how the proposals on the table at Reykjavik had fallen off the table in Washington after the Iran-Contra scandal and Poindexter’s departure, and as the result of the U.S. military’s opposition. NSC senior staffer Alton Keel sets up an agenda for President Reagan’s meeting with the Joint Chiefs of Staff that includes the elimination of ballistic missiles together with routine briefings about military exercises and anti-drug efforts in Bolivia, and alerts the President to the military’s insistence on large spending increases. But he does not forward the striking talking points prepared by the NSC staff (under Poindexter) that would have expressed to the top U.S. military what Reagan had said at Reykjavik to Gorbachev.

SECRET: GERMANY WARNS THE USG ABOUT A BRAZILIAN PROCUREMENT ATTEMPT OF PROLIFERATION CONCERN

VZCZCXRO1391
PP RUEHSL
DE RUEHRL #0921/01 2121541
ZNY SSSSS ZZH
P 311541Z JUL 09
FM AMEMBASSY BERLIN
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 4817
INFO RUCNFRG/FRG COLLECTIVE
RUCNNSG/NUCLEAR SUPPLIERS GROUP
RUCNWSN/THE WASSENAAR ARRANGEMENT
RUEHBR/AMEMBASSY BRASILIA 0315
RHEFHLC/HOMELAND SECURITY CENTER WASHINGTON DC
RUEIDN/DNI WASHINGTON DC
RUEAIIA/CIA WASHINGTON DC
S E C R E T SECTION 01 OF 02 BERLIN 000921 
 
SIPDIS 
STATE FOR EUR/CE PETER SCHROEDER 
STATE FOR ISN 
STATE FOR EUR/PRM 
 
E.O. 12958: DECL: 07/31/2034 
TAGS: MTCRE PREL PINR MNUC ETTC KSCA KNNP IR BR GM
SUBJECT: (S) GERMANY WARNS THE USG ABOUT A BRAZILIAN 
PROCUREMENT ATTEMPT OF PROLIFERATION CONCERN 
 
Classified By: Acting Global Affairs Unit Chief David L. Fisher 
for reasons 1.4 (b) and (d). 
 
1.  (S) On July 31, MFA Export Control Division Desk Officer 
Nancy Reck provided EconOff with a German-language non-paper 
warning US export control authorities about a potential 
Brazilian procurement attempt of proliferation concern for 
"Automatic High-Precision Heavy-Duty Necking-In-Machines with 
CNC Control" from a US vendor.  German authorities received 
an application from a German firm for the export of four 
Necking-In-Machines to Brazil, which they plan on rejecting 
for fears that these machines would be diverted to the Middle 
East -- probably Iran.  (COMMENT: The German producer of 
these machines was not mentioned or listed in the non-paper. 
END COMMENT)  The Germans based their conclusions on their 
own research and information from an unnamed "reliable 
source" (NFI).  Reck shared that Germany is confident in the 
strength of their legal position should the German producer 
challenge the rejection in court. 
 
2.  (S) Begin text of informal Embassy translation of 
German-language non-paper: 
 
In regards to our partnership in the area of 
non-proliferation and our excellent partnership in export 
control affairs, we would like to bring the following 
information to the attention of your government: 
 
A German firm placed an export application for four 
"Automatic High-Precision Heavy-Duty Necking-In-Machines with 
CNC Control" (Einziehmaschinen) with a total value of 
7,700,000 euro.  The machines are controlled by both the 
Wassenaar Arrangement and the Nuclear Suppliers Group (NSG). 
The stated recipient is the firm Export Business & Consult 
located in Brazil.  This firm's address is as follows: 
 
Export Business & Consult 
Av. Osmar Cunha 183-712A 
Florianopolis, Santa Catarina, 88015-100 
Brazil 
 
The end-user is listed as Export Business & Consult, Rua Ivo 
Luchi s/n Bairro Industrial, Palhoca, Santa Catarina, Brazil. 
 (COMMENT:  Reck said the term "s/n" in this sentence refers 
to "street name."  END COMMENT)  The stated end-use 
description is for the production of gas cylinders, pressure 
containers, and CNG-cylinders for automobiles. 
 
From a reliable "source", we have obtained the following 
information: 
 
-- The Brazilian authorities are investigating the receiver 
because of suspicion connecting the firm with procurement of 
dual-use goods, listed under the Wassenaar Arrangement, for 
diversion to the Middle-East. 
 
-- The firm has already tried to procure machine tools in 
numerous European countries 
 
-- The existence of a declared end-user could not be proven 
 
-- The declared receiver has neither the physical facilities 
nor the financial means or the technical possibilities to use 
the Necking-In-Machines for themselves. 
 
-- The previous activities of both firms give cause for the 
presumption, that it has to do with a front company without 
financial movement or registered business capital. 
 
-- According to the source's assessment, this case could be 
connected with the proliferation of critical goods to the 
Middle East (presumably Iran). 
 
We will reject this application.  Due to the long 
investigation time, the export applicant's legal 
representative shared that the Brazilian end-user could 
possibly make an effort to procure the machines from the USA. 
 
 
We look forward to the continuation of our excellent 
cooperation in the affairs of non-proliferation and export 
control. 
 
BERLIN 00000921  002 OF 002 
 
 
 
End text of informal Embassy translation. 
Bradtke

CONFIDENTIAL: THE U.S.-CHINA HUMAN RIGHTS DIALOGUE, WORKING

VZCZCXRO6907
OO RUEHCN RUEHGH RUEHVC
DE RUEHBJ #2104/01 1511040
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
O 301040Z MAY 08
FM AMEMBASSY BEIJING
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 7651
INFO RUEHOO/CHINA POSTS COLLECTIVE
RHMFISS/CDR USPACOM HONOLULU HI
RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHINGTON DC
RHEHNSC/NSC WASHDC
RUEAIIA/CIA WASHINGTON DC
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 04 BEIJING 002104 

SIPDIS 

DEPARTMENT FOR DRL 

E.O. 12958: DECL: 05/30/2033
TAGS: PHUM PREL KOLY NK BR CH
SUBJECT: THE U.S.-CHINA HUMAN RIGHTS DIALOGUE, WORKING
LUNCH, MAY 26, 2008: UNHRC, ICCPR, NORTH KOREA, BURMA 

Classified By: POLITICAL MINISTER COUNSELOR AUBREY CARLSON. REASONS 1.4
 (B) AND (D). 

1. (U) May 26, 2008; 1:30 p.m.; Beijing, Diaoyutai State
Guesthouse 

2. (U) Participants: 

U.S.
David J. Kramer, Assistant Secretary of State for Democracy,
Rights, and Labor
John V. Hanford, Ambassador at Large for International
Religious Freedom
Thomas Christensen, Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for
East Asian and Pacific Affairs
Dan Picutta, Charge d'Affairs, a.i., Embassy Beijing
Robert K. Harris, Assistant Legal Advisor, Department of State
Richard W. Behrend, PRM Advisor, Department of State
Susan O'Sullivan, Senior Advisor, Bureau of Democracy,
Rights, and Labor, Department of State
Dan Kritenbrink, Internal Unit Chief, Political Section,
Embassy Beijing
Emilie L. Kao, Foreign Affairs Officer, Bureau of Democracy
Rights, and Labor, International Religious Freedom,
Department of State
Jeannette M. Windon, Special Assistant, Office of Democracy
and Global Affairs, Department of State
Andrea Goodman, Political Officer, Bureau of East Asian and
Pacific Affairs, Department of State
Steve Goldrup, Second Secretary, Embassy Beijing
Gregory May, Second Secretary, Embassy Beijing (notetaker)
James Brown, Interpreter 

PRC
Wu Hailong, Director General, International Organizations and
Conferences Department, MFA
Shen Yongxiang, Deputy Director General, International
Organizations and Conferences Department, MFA
Yao Maochen, Deputy Inspector of United Front Work
Department, CPC Central Committee
Teng Wei, Deputy Director General, Criminal Division,
Legislative Affairs Commission of the National People's
Congress Standing Committee
Wan Yonghai, Presiding Judge, Second Criminal Division,
Supreme People's Court
Sun Maoli, Deputy Director General, Legal Affairs Department,
Ministry of Public Security
Liu Guoyu, Deputy Director General, Prison Administration
Department, Ministry of Justice
Guo Wei, Director General, Foreign Affairs Department, State
Administration for Religious Affairs
Liu Zhengrong, Director General (acting), Internet
Department, State Council Information Office
Suolang Renzeng, Deputy Chief, Administration for Ethnic and
Religious Affairs, Tibetan Autonomous Region
Zhao Yubin, Director, North American and Oceanian Affairs
Department, MFA
Yan Jiarong, Director, International Organizations and
Conferences Department, MFA
Yao Shaojun, Deputy Director, International Organizations and
Conferences Department, MFA
Xu Jing, Deputy Director, International Organizations and
Conferences Department, MFA Zheng Zeguang, Director General,
North American and Oceanian Affairs
Zu Yanwei, Attache, International Organizations and
Conferences Department, MFA
Liu Lingxiao, Attache, International Organizations and
Conferences Department, MFA
Fang Qiang, Interpreter, MFA 

Summary
------- 

3. (C) China and the United States should cooperate more on
human rights issues in the United Nations, Shen Yongxiang,
Deputy Director General of the MFA's Department of
International Organizations, said during a May 26 working
lunch.  DDG Shen said the United States should reengage with
the Council in order to improve it.  DDG Shen said China
intends to invite the new UN High Commissioner for Human
Rights to visit, saying there was not enough time left in
current Commissioner Louise Arbour's term for this.  DRL
Assistant Secretary Kramer countered that Arbour would
welcome a chance to visit China.  DDG Shen said China will
continue to host visits by UN Special Rapporteurs at a rate
of one per year.  China is working toward ratification of the 

BEIJING 00002104  002 OF 004 

International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR)
but must still accomplish further legal reforms, including a
review of China's Reeducation Through Labor (RTL) system, in
order to comply with the Covenant.  On North Korean refugees,
Director General Wu Hailong repeated standard points that
North Koreans in China are "economic migrants."  However,
China has been cooperative with the UNHCR and will allow the
remaining five North Koreans under UNHCR care to depart for
third countries by the end of June.  EAP DAS Christensen
urged China to press Burma to grant access to foreign
disaster relief experts.  DG Wu said Burma continues to be
suspicious of the United States, yet the Burmese regime is
taking positive steps, including accepting U.S. material
assistance.  End Summary. 

UN Human Rights Council
----------------------- 

4. (C) DDG Shen Yongxiang began the May 26 working lunch with
an appeal that the United States and China work more closely
in the UN Human Rights Council.  Shen argued that more
cooperation in the UN between the United States and China in
the area of human rights would improve the international
image of both countries.  China is ready to work with the
United States to promote a UN body that is "fair, objective
and non-selective."  DDG Shen complained that, following the
"serious crimes" carried out by rioters in Lhasa March 14,
the United States "violated the proceedings" of the UN Human
Rights Council by unfairly accusing China of rights
violations in Tibet.  China hopes the United States will
participate in a "more productive way" in the Human Rights
Council.  China supports the current process of universal
periodic review in the Human Rights Council, and the United
States should take the review process seriously.  DDG Shen
encouraged the United States to participate in the upcoming
Durban UN World Conference Against Racism. 

5. (C) A/S Kramer responded that the United States is
extremely disappointed in the UN Human Rights Council.  The
periodic review process is a possible positive mechanism, but
it is too early to tell how successful that mechanism will
be.  On Durban, A/S Kramer said that while it will ultimately
be up to the next administration to decide whether the United
States participates, this would be "extremely difficult"
unless there is a major overhaul of the approaches to be
taken at the conference.  A/S Kramer noted that Canada has
already announced it will skip the Durban conference and
Israel has serious reservations.  DDG Shen said that while
China "respects" the views of the United States and its
disappointment with the Human Rights Council, some current
deficiencies could have been avoided had the United States
been more engaged at the start of the reform process.  DDG
Shen said the United States and other Western countries
backed the idea that the support of one-third of Human Rights
Council members is enough to hold a special session, whereas
China believes a 50-percent threshold would have been fairer.
 Assistant Legal Advisor Harris said that the United States
agreed that the Council should not have double standards or
be politicized.  The Council should be willing to address
fairly the most serious human rights abuses wherever they
occur.  However, the United States believes it is a double
standard for the Council to hold many special sessions and
adopt one-sided resolutions concerning Israel while failing
to hold special sessions on the most serious human rights
problems (for example Zimbabwe).  Meanwhile, the Council in
its first year issued only two special mechanisms mandates,
which involved Cuba and Belarus.  As a practical matter,
China's earlier proposal to require a 50-percent majority for
calling special sessions would not prevent special sessions
involving Israel.  However, a 50-percent threshold might have
proven to be a barrier to convening special sessions
regarding other countries with profound human rights problems. 

Visits by UN Commissioners, Special Rapporteurs
--------------------------------------------- -- 

6. (C) A/S Kramer urged China to host more Special
Rapporteurs and to invite UN Human Rights Commissioner Louise
Arbour to visit Tibet.  DDG Shen said China is "open and
positive" about receiving a visit by the Commissioner.
However, her term will expire this year.  China thus will
extend an invitation to the new Commissioner.  Kramer replied
that Arbour would welcome the chance to visit China before
her term expires and could easily find time on her schedule.
Harris added that the possibility of visiting Tibet is the
reason Arbour wants to make a visit during the last months of 

BEIJING 00002104  003 OF 004 

her tenure.  China, DDG Shen said, also welcomes visits by
various UN Special Rapporteurs and already has extended
invitations to the Rapporteurs on religious freedom and
education, among others.  China's goal is to host a visit by
one Special Rapporteur per year.  However, China has not
hosted such visits in the last two years while the UN Human
Rights Council structure has been under review.  Once the
review is complete, China will resume issuing invitations.
However, DDG Shen added, China must balance the timing and
sequencing of Special Rapporteur visits between the
political, cultural and social realms.  Harris commented that
the United States hosts on average three Special Rapporteurs
per year and has had several visits in the past two years. 

ICCPR
----- 

7. (C) China is "positive" about the International Covenant
on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), DDG Shen asserted, and
since signing the Covenant has been making efforts to prepare
for ratification.  Since 2003, China has engaged in a series
of judicial reforms that will help smooth eventual
ratification.  However, China still must make additional
reforms to its criminal justice system in order to comply
with the ICCPR, and is currently reviewing its Reform Through
Labor (RTL) system.  All of these changes will create
favorable conditions for ratification of the ICCPR.  Finally,
China's Ministry of Foreign Affairs is working with the
United Nations to resolve "inconsistencies" that have been
identified in the Chinese translation of the ICCPR.  China,
DDG Shen averred, is even more "eager" to ratify the ICCPR
than the United States is to ratify the International
Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR).
Harris noted that the United States has not yet announced an
intention to ratify the ICESCR because, like China, the
United States wants to be absolutely sure that it can
implement all the Covenant's provisions. 

North Korea
----------- 

8. (C) PRM Advisor Behrend urged China to stop repatriating
North Korean refugees against their will, particularly those
seeking protection from the UN High Commission for Refugees
(UNHCR) office i China.  China should improve access for
Nort Korean refugees to UNHCR and grant Chinese iizenship
to children of mixed Chinese-North Korean parentage, which
would allow them access to schools and other social services.
 Director General Wu Hailong responded that North Koreans in
China are not "refugees" but rather economic migrants who
have entered the country illegally.  Nevertheless, China has
cooperated in the cases of 30 North Koreans under UNHCR care.
 By June, China will approve the departure to third countries
of the remaining five North Koreans still under UNHCR care in
China.  DG Wu urged the United States not to allow U.S.
nationals to break Chinese law by becoming involved with
North Korean illegal migrants.  DG Wu noted that illegal
migrants from North Korea had in the past violated Chinese
law by storming diplomatic compounds and international
schools.  The ultimate solution to the North Korean problem
is to work toward peace and stability on the Korean
peninsula.  Once the DPRK economy develops, DG Wu predicted,
the number of illegal border crossers from North Korea will
decline. 

Burma Humanitarian Relief
------------------------- 

9. (C) EAP DAS Christensen expressed appreciation for China's
help in convincing Burma to accept U.S. cyclone relief
assistance.  Christensen urged China to push Burma to allow
foreign relief workers into the country.  Though Burma has
accepted supplies from the United States, the Burmese regime
should also agree to accept technical experts from around the
world.  Such experts are needed on the ground to ensure an
effective aid operation.  DG Wu said China appreciates the
help the USG has given to Burma.  Any international
assistance effort, however, must respect the needs and wishes
of Burma.  The United States has been hostile to Burma's
development, and this, DG Wu said, has led to suspicion on
the Burmese side.  Despite this, DG Wu continued, Burma is
now accepting U.S. aid and recently allowed a visit by U.S.
Pacific Command's Admiral Keating.  DG Wu observed that Burma
remains hesitant to admit aid workers and has not granted
entry to a team of Chinese rescue workers.  After the
devastating earthquake in Sichuan, China has been very open 

BEIJING 00002104  004 OF 004 

to offers of international assistance, DG Wu said, and
China's attitude has affected Burma.  A/S Kramer praised
China's response to the earthquake and openness to outside
help.  DG Wu said China's openness shows the progress China
has made in many areas.
PICCUTA

SECRET: TIBET: MFA ORGANIZES TIGHTLY CONTROLLED TRIP

VZCZCXRO8966
OO RUEHAG RUEHCN RUEHGH RUEHROV RUEHVC
DE RUEHBJ #1210/01 0911303
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
O 311303Z MAR 08
FM AMEMBASSY BEIJING
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 6186
INFO RUEHOO/CHINA POSTS COLLECTIVE PRIORITY
RUCNMEM/EU MEMBER STATES COLLECTIVE PRIORITY
RUEHDR/AMEMBASSY DAR ES SALAAM PRIORITY 0368
RUEHMO/AMEMBASSY MOSCOW PRIORITY 8974
RUEHGP/AMEMBASSY SINGAPORE PRIORITY 9347
RUEAIIA/CIA WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY
RHEHNSC/NSC WASHDC PRIORITY
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 08 BEIJING 001210 

SIPDIS 

SIPDIS 

E.O. 12958: DECL: 03/31/2028
TAGS: PHUM PGOV PREL KIRF NP IN JA BR GM CA IT
SP, SI, SL, TZ, UK, AU, FR, RS, CH
SUBJECT: TIBET: MFA ORGANIZES TIGHTLY CONTROLLED TRIP TO
LHASA FOR DIPLOMATS, MARCH 28-29 

REF: BEIJING 975 

Classified By: Deputy Chief of Mission Dan Piccuta.
Reasons 1.4 (b) and (d). 

Summary
------- 

1. (C) With less than 24-hours notice to participating
Embassies, China's Ministry of Foreign Affairs,
together with the Tibetan Autonomous Region (TAR)
Government, organized an overnight trip to Lhasa March
28 to 29.  Fifteen Beijing-based diplomats, including
PolOff, participated.  Diplomats were shown destroyed
shops, a burnt school building and two hospitals
treating wounded security officers and civilians.  The
trip was tightly controlled and Chinese journalists
were present at nearly all meetings.  PolOff observed
extensive damage to shops starting two to three blocks
east of the Potala Palace and increasing in areas
closer to the Tibetan quarter.  TAR officials sought
to demonstrate that both Han and Tibetans had suffered
as a result of the violence and rioting.  While PolOff
saw a significant presence of regular police, there
was a noticeable absence of military vehicles or anti-
riot equipment.  The delegation met with TAR Chairman
Qiangba Puncog.  At the meeting with Qiangba Puncog,
diplomats pressed for details about the number of dead
and the charges against those currently under
detention.  PolOff urged China to exercise restraint
and engage in substantive dialogue with the Dalai
Lama's representatives.  PolOff also repeated to the
TAR Chairman the USG's request for unfettered access
for diplomats to all Tibetan areas. 

2. (C) Summary continued. In response to the
diplomatic delegation's collective request to visit
the Jokhang Temple and speak with monks involved in a
March 27 demonstration in front of an MFA-led group of
foreign journalists, MFA and TAR officials arranged a
hasty visit to Barkhor Square and the Jokhang on the
morning of March 29.  Diplomats met with a single
monk, who said all of his colleagues were "sleeping"
and thus "unavailable" to meet with the delegation.
The Barkhor area was almost devoid of people, save for
security attached to the delegation.  Organizers
denied PolOff's requests to venture into the city to
meet with Amcits, but PolOff was given the opportunity
to meet with one Amcit at the delegation's hotel.
Government organizers also arranged for foreign
residents of Lhasa, including two American NGO
workers, to attend a briefing with Tibetan scholars
and Buddhist figures, where PolOff was able to speak
with them.  The foreign residents were mainly chosen
by the TAR Government, however, not the participating
diplomats.  Comment:  Although some of the events on
this trip were crudely stage-managed, it is clear that
Lhasa has suffered widespread ethnic-based violence
and rioting.  A large percentage of the population,
Han and Tibetan, have suffered great economic loss,
both from the rioting itself and the cancellation of
tour groups.  Interlocutors' complete lack of candor
about the underlying social factors contributing to
the riots, while not unexpected, was disturbing
nonetheless.  End Summary. 

"We Leave For Lhasa Tomorrow"
----------------------------- 

3. (C) Ministry of Foreign Affairs U.S. Affairs
Division Director An Gang told PolOff March 27 that
the MFA's Department of External Security Affairs, in
cooperation with the Tibet Autonomous Region (TAR)
Foreign Affairs Office (FAO), was organizing a trip for
foreign diplomats to Lhasa, leaving the next morning,
March 28.  Embassy Beijing was given one hour by the
MFA to register a participant for the trip, which
would involve a total of 25 hours on the ground in
Lhasa.  In addition to U.S. Embassy Beijing, the
Beijing Embassies/Missions of Brazil, Japan, Germany,
Canada, the European Commission, Italy, Spain,
Slovenia (as EU President), Singapore, Tanzania (as
Africa Union President), the United Kingdom,
Australia, France and Russia also sent 

BEIJING 00001210  002 OF 008 

representatives.  At 17:00 on March 27, participating
diplomats were called to a briefing presided over by
Vice Foreign Minister (VFM) Wu Dawei.  VFM Wu told the
group that the MFA was organizing the trip so that
diplomats could provide "more correct reports" on the
situation in Lhasa and Tibet to their respective
capitals.  VFM Wu offered no details about the
itinerary, other than the TAR FAO would provide the
schedule to the delegation upon arrival in Lhasa.  VFM
Wu also said that, although the situation in Lhasa was
"generally stable," for safety reasons everyone must
abide by the "arrangements" set by the MFA and the TAR
Government.  PolOff told VFM Wu that AmEmbassy Beijing
viewed the trip, and a similar trip organized the same
week for foreign journalists, as a "first step" but
reiterated the USG's request that diplomats and
journalists have free and unfettered access to all
Tibetan areas affected by recent unrest. 

Chinese Media Presence
---------------------- 

4. (C) In addition to numerous minders from the
Ministry of Foreign Affairs, plain-clothes security
personnel and the TAR FAO, at least two Xinhua print
journalists and a China Central Television (CCTV)
journalist and cameraman accompanied the delegation.
CCTV crews filmed most events on the trip, including
the arrival and departure at Lhasa airport.  Xinhua
News Agency quoted accurately, though selectively,
some delegation member's positive comments about the
trip, particularly a statement by Tanzanian Minister
George Manongi (representing the African Union) that
"no government would tolerate" violent protests. 

Security Presence Observed in Lhasa
----------------------------------- 

5. (C) The delegation's motorcade included both police
and People's Armed Police (PAP) escorts. (Plate
numbers for PAP vehicles seen by PolOff, including
those attached to the motorcade, all started with WJ
23.)  The airport road appeared to be open to other
traffic during the delegation's arrival and departure
from Lhasa.  PolOff saw at least two groups of
Tibetans picnicking very close to the road.  As the
motorcade neared Lhasa proper, PolOff saw numerous PRC
flags flying over Tibetan-style homes.  At nearly
every intersection where village roads met the main
airport road, a single officer was stationed with his
or her back to the motorcade, looking down the
approaching roadway.  PolOff observed no checkpoints
at any point on the trip except for one on the airport
road that appeared little different from a normal
traffic police checkpoint. 

6. (C) The security presence in Lhasa was noticeable
and significantly larger than that observed by PolOff
during a visit to Lhasa with ConGen Chengdu officers
February 26-29, 2008.  At least one police vehicle
(mainly sedans and SUVs) and one to three officers
were seen at most intersections. Police officers were
mainly sitting in, or standing next to, their vehicles
rather than walking the streets.  At one point, PolOff
saw several police poke their heads out of a police
station doorway to watch the motorcade pass by.
PolOff saw only scattered PAP vehicles other than
those attached to the delegation.  PolOff observed no
officers in riot gear, nor did he see any heavier
police vehicles such as water cannon trucks.  During a
visit to the Jokhang Temple March 29, some diplomats
reported seeing a few helmeted police in side streets
leading off Barkhor Square.  Over the course of the
trip, PolOff saw three canvas-covered military
transport trucks; one had its plates covered, the
other two were without plates entirely.  (Note: An
Amcit resident (protect) told PolOff that a large
number of security forces remained in Lhasa but they
had been confined to compounds during the Government-
organized visits that week by foreign journalists and
diplomats.  A TAR FAO minder told delegation members
that no PLA assets were used to suppress the March 14
riots.) 

BEIJING 00001210  003 OF 008 

Fewer People onStreets
----------------------- 

7. (C) At est, PolOff observed pedestrian traffic at
a tir of the level it was in late February, thoug
in some areas it was much less.  During te late
afternoon of March 28, PolOff observedfewer than ten
Tibetan pilgrims with prayer weels walking in front
of the Potala Palace.  Te next day, March 29, PolOff
observed well over a hundred pilgrims walking on the
Potala circumambulation route.  During this second
drive-by, a TAR FAO minder highlighted the presence of
the pilgrims to PolOff.  In contrast to February, when
pilgrims of various ages and dress could be seen in
Lhasa, the pilgrims observed during this visit, in
addition to being fewer in number, also appeared to be
primarily elderly Tibetans.  Also, areas in the
Tibetan quarter that were packed with pilgrims in
February looked nearly abandoned.  One street near the
Ramoche Temple was blocked by a police cordon, and
behind this barrier, PolOff could see few, if any,
people.  From the motorcade on Beijing East Road
looking into the Barkhor area, PolOff also saw streets
that were nearly devoid of people.  Diplomats who
participated in a March 29 stop at the Jokhang Temple
reported that the streets in the Barkhor district were
practically abandoned. 

Arrival and Visit to Affected Areas
----------------------------------- 

8. (C) Immediately upon arrival in Lhasa on March 28,
organizers took the delegation to a clothing store on
Beijing Middle Road where four Han and one Tibetan
shopkeeper had been killed.  As the delegation pulled
up to the store, the Han Chinese owner and a surviving
Tibetan shop assistant were kneeling before a memorial
altar set up in the burnt-out shop.  Shortly after the
delegation's arrival, they emerged to speak with
diplomats as television cameras rolled.  Next, the
delegation was led on a driving tour of Beijing Road,
Qingnian Road, and North and East Linkuo Road to view
damaged businesses and homes.  TAR FAO interpreters
pointed out damage to Xinhua News Agency offices, the
Tibet Daily and a Bank of China branch.  An FAO minder
also pointed out that a local television station and
stores carrying mobile phones, foreign-branded goods
and precious gems had been specifically target by
rioters/looters. 

Visit to Damaged School
----------------------- 

9. (C) The delegation was then taken to Lhasa Second
Middle School where an entire classroom building had
been gutted by fire.  The Tibetan principal of the
school described the efforts of staff to protect the
children on March 14 and how rioters had allegedly set
fire to the building and then blocked fire trucks from
arriving on the scene.  The fire also consumed many of
the schools' textbooks, she said.  According to the
principal, 80 percent of the school's 839 students are
ethnic Tibetan, in keeping with the population of the
surrounding neighborhood. The teaching staff was 90
percent Tibetan.  In addition to standard Mandarin
Chinese curriculum taught in China, students at Lhasa
Second Middle School receive 280 minutes of Tibetan
and 200 minutes of English instruction per week.
Diplomats then observed primary school students taking
a history lesson in a science lab that had been
converted into an ordinary classroom since the March
14 fire.  At the back of the classroom was a display
condemning the March 14 riots.  An FAO handler
remarked to a delegation member that the "lawbreakers
do not want to see good schools and the development of
society." 

Extent of Damage
---------------- 

10. (C) Judging by the very limited tour given to the
diplomats, the area of Lhasa west of the Potala Palace
seemed unaffected by the rioting.  Individual burned
out stores could be seen starting two to three blocks 

BEIJING 00001210  004 OF 008 

east of the Potala, with the ratio of damaged to
undamaged shops increasing as one neared the Ramoche
Temple/Barkhor area.  At some points along Beijing
East and Lingkhor North and East Roads, entire rows of
shops had been burned or damaged.  On Beijing East
Road, PolOff saw that the (Nepali/Tibetan operated)
Kyichu Hotel had only a single broken window while the
neighboring six shops, by contrast, including a Han-
run sunglass store visited by PolOff in February, had
been completely burned out.  Despite extensive damage
to stores, all roads were clean, and PolOff saw little
debris on sidewalks.  In the areas east of the Potala
Palace, about a third of stores remained shuttered,
making it difficult to assess whether shops were
damaged or just closed.  For every store that was
burned out, at least ten others showed signs of damage
to the metal rolling shutter or broken windows.  All
over Lhasa, PolOff saw white katas (Tibetan greeting
scarves) affixed to storefronts, an indication that
the store is Tibetan-owned (reftel). 

Meeting with TAR Chairman
------------------------- 

11. (SBU) Following the tour and check-in at the Lhasa
Hotel (in a largely unaffected area of west Lhasa) on
the evening of March 28, the delegation arrived at the
TAR Government compound for a meeting with TAR
Chairman Qiangba Puncog and a large contingent of
high-level TAR officials, including the Mayor of Lhasa
Doje Cezhug.  (Note:  As TAR Chairman, Qiangba Puncog
is equivalent to a provincial governor and is ranked
behind the top PRC official in Tibet, TAR Party
Chairman Zhang Qingli.)  After introductions and
before Qiangba Puncog could read his prepared report,
the Slovenian Counselor, Bernard Srajner asked the TAR
Chairman a series of questions prepared in advance by
the EU participants.  A summary of the EU questions
and Qiangba Puncog's answers (both in his prepared
remarks and response to follow up questions) follows: 

--What is the fate of 13 people arrested in a
demonstration on March 10?  The TAR Chairman said 15
people (13 monks and 2 lay people) had participated in
the March 10 demonstration in Lhasa, which included
raising the "snow mountain flag."  The thirteen monks
are among 303 total people detained, but Qiangba
Puncog gave no additional information on what the 13
monks were charged with.  (Note:  The figure of 303
detained appeared to be a figure for detainees related
to demonstrations prior to March 14.) 

--What happened in the first 24 hours of March 14?
Why did security forces "hold back" at first?
Qiangba Puncog repeated a standard Government version
of events, saying the March 14 "beating, smashing,
looting, and burning" incident had been "masterminded"
by the Dalai Lama clique in an attempt to sabotage the
Olypics.  Police and PAP officers had exercised
estraint.  Government forces had not used fireams,
though authorities confiscated some "lead bullet" guns
from some rioters.  (Comment:  The term "lead bullet"
guns seemed to indicate non-police, makeshift
firearms.)  The TAR Chairman said the TAR Government
had failed to protect civilians, and he apologized to
victims in the hospitals. 

--How many people were killed and injured?  The TAR
Chairman repeated published casualty figures.  He said
382 innocent civilians had been injured, 58 seriously.
Eighteen "innocent civilians" had been killed,
including an infant below the age of one.  In
addition, one police officer and three rioters were
killed.  Seven schools, 5 hospitals, 908 shops and 120
private residences had been damaged with total losses
amounting to RMB 250 million ($36 million). 

--What is the nature of charges against detainees?
Will independent observers be allowed at trials?  As a
result of the March 14 riot, 414 people had been
detained.  An additional 289 had turned themselves in,
although 111 of these people had already been released
because their crimes were "minor."  Qiangba Puncog
said PRC law prohibits splittism.  Defendants will be 

BEIJING 00001210  005 OF 008 

charged not for their views, but for their "public
actions."  All cases will be dealt with according to
law.  Some who committed "small crimes" will be
released but the more "serious" cases will go to
trial.  All defendants will have access to legal
counsel, including legal aid for those who have no
money to afford a defense attorney.  (Note:  While
Qiangba Puncog did not directly answer the question
about outside observers, the Canadian participant said
the head of the TAR Justice Department (si fa ting)
later told her at a banquet immediately afterward that
outside observers would not be possible.) 

--What has happened to monks who demonstrated at the
Jokhang Temple in front of visiting journalists?
Qiangba Puncog characterized the incident as an
example of "Government tolerance."  It was "natural"
for some people to have different views, and the monks
will not be punished, he said.  The Australian
participant, in a follow-up question, asked for a
visit to the Jokhang Temple to speak with the monks
involved in the incident.  The Chairman said TAR
authorities would consider adding a Jokhang visit to
the schedule.  (Note:  A hastily arranged visit to the
Jokhang was arranged the next morning, as reported
below.) 

"We Are Already Restrained and Non-Violent"
------------------------------------------- 

12. (C) During the meeting with the TAR Chairman,
PolOff stated USG points regarding the need for China
to exercise restraint and for all sides to refrain
from violence.  China should respect the legal rights
of peaceful protestors and enter substantive dialogue
with representatives of the Dalai Lama.  PolOff ended
by saying, while the current trip was a positive step
in the right direction, the USG still seeks unfettered
access for diplomats to all Tibetan areas, inside and
outside the TAR.  More and better access was in the
interests of all sides, PolOff said.  Qiangba Puncog
responded that he already understood the U.S. position
and that Chinese President Hu Jintao had already
discussed the Tibet situation directly with President
Bush.  China is "already exercising restraint and
refraining from violence," so such calls are unnecessary.
It was because of this restraint, including no use of
lethal weapons by security forces, that the riot took
so long to get under control.  The TAR Government places
great importance on the visit by diplomats, Qiangba
Puncog said, urging delegation members to report the
"real situation" to their respective "highest leaders." 

13. (SBU) Qiangba Puncog also defended China's economic
and religious policies in Tibet.  The TAR Governor
highlighted a string of new measures, announced the
following day in TAR newspapers, designed to provide
economic relief to victims of the rioting.  He noted
that Tibet was experiencing high growth rates and
rising income, thanks in no small part to Central
Government support.  Prices were stable in the TAR
following the unrest, he asserted.  There was no need
to adjust Government policies regarding religion, he
said.  After the meeting, Qiangba Puncog hosted a
banquet for the delegation, followed by the screening
of a documentary film on the March 14 riots. 

Meeting with U.S. Citizens
-------------------------- 

14. (C) PolOff requested that, instead of watching the
documentary on March 28, he be allowed to go out on
his own to visit with American citizens in Lhasa.
Several other diplomats also requested time to meet
with their citizens in lieu of the film.  The TAR FAO
agreed to excuse PolOff and other diplomats from the
film, but only on condition that meetings with
citizens take place at the Lhasa Hotel.  PolOff was
told he could not venture outside of the hotel "for
safety reasons."  PolOff contacted three Amcits.  Two
noted that foreigners were still instructed to stay
indoors at night, making a 21:00 meeting at the hotel
impractical.  One Amcit, a long-term Lhasa resident
who lives close to the hotel, agreed to visit with 

BEIJING 00001210  006 OF 008 

PolOff in the hotel lobby.  (Note:  The Amcit reported
that he was fine, though some money had been looted
from one of his downtown Lhasa shops, which had also
been sprayed by gunfire.  The Amcit also noted that
tension in the city between ethnic Tibetans and Han
remains.) 

15. (C) Delegation members were given a second chance
to meet with their respective citizens, though trip
organizers, not the diplomats, controlled who was
invited.  During the pre-trip briefing with VFM Wu
Dawei, several diplomats requested that they be given
a chance to meet with their respective citizens in
Lhasa.  VFM Wu said such meetings would likely be
possible but had to take place at the delegation's
hotel.  Some Embassies, but not the United States,
provided contact information for their citizens in
Lhasa to the MFA to facilitate meetings.  The TAR FAO,
in response to this request, then apparently invited
about ten foreign residents to attend the final
meeting of the trip March 29, a briefing by TAR
scholars and official religious figures.  The
delegation was not provided with any name list prior
to the meeting.  Upon arrival, PolOff learned that two
Amcit NGO workers, one of whom had declined an
invitation to meet PolOff at the hotel the previous
evening, were present.  The foreign residents mainly
sat and listened as the Tibetan scholars denounced the
Dalai Lama.  PolOff asked that the meeting be cut
short to allow time for individual discussions with
citizens.  One of the Amcits told PolOff his
organization's "local partner" had encouraged him to
attend the meeting, which he did for the sake of
maintaining cooperative relations.  The other, the
Tibet director for a multi-national environmental NGO,
indicated that his boss at the NGO had requested that
he attend.  PolOff told both that they were under no
obligation to meet with USG officials.  However, both
voluntarily met with PolOff for about 15 minutes each.
(Note:  Both Amcits reported that they were fine and
that, after being unable to venture outside for four
days following the March 14 riots, things in Lhasa
were now beginning to return to normal.)  Other
diplomats later complained that citizens whom they had
requested that the MFA/TAR FAO invite were not
contacted. 

Visit to Jokhang Temple, "Monks are Sleeping"
--------------------------------------------- 

16. (C) Around 01:00 March 29, all delegation members,
except PolOff, received calls in their hotel rooms
that the start time for the next morning had been
moved up from 08:30 to 08:00.  According to the
Australian participant, when delegation members
boarded the vans just before 08:00, organizers told
them there had been a "change in the schedule" but
offered no details.  As the motorcade departed just
prior to 08:00, several delegation members noted the
absence of some of the diplomats and requested that
the motorcade wait.  MFA/TAR FAO handlers refused.
(Note:  Three other diplomats who, unlike PolOff, knew
about the time change but arrived at the motorcade
just at 08:00, were left behind and also missed the
trip to the Jokhang.)  PolOff's request that he be
allowed to catch up to the motorcade by taxi was
refused.  The Government minders, according to those
who made it on the bus, were extremely nervous and
appeared desperate to complete the visit to Jokhang as
rapidly as possible.  The diplomats only realized that
they were being taken to the Jokhang Temple as they
pulled into Barkhor Square. 

17. (C) Upon arrival, the diplomats noticed a much
larger security contingent than at other events on the
trip.  Officials were "extremely nervous" during the
visit, several diplomats later told PolOff.  Other
than the delegation and the escorts/security, Barkhor
Square and the surrounding streets were abandoned.
Little, if any, damage to shops in the Barkhor was
noticeable, according to U.K. Political Counselor
Peter Wilson.  The MFA/TAR FAO officials escorted the
group into the temple where they met with a single
monk who is a member of the Jokhang's Democratic 

BEIJING 00001210  007 OF 008 

Management Committee.  When the group asked to see the
monks involved in the March 27 demonstration in front
of foreign journalists, the monk said they and the
other monks were all in their dorm "sleeping."  The
monk said that his colleagues who had participated in
the incident were "young and lacked understanding,"
but they would not be punished.  Wilson noted that the
Jokhang is usually packed with pilgrims.  The monk
said that the temple was closed for the day but would
reopen tomorrow.  Several diplomats left the Temple
early in disgust and then staged a mini-protest,
refusing to get back on the bus while they debated
whether to continue with the visit.  They eventually
decided to proceed with the schedule.  Australian
Political Officer Eleanor Lawson, who had requested to
TAR Chairman Qiangba Puncog that the Jokhang be added
to the schedule and later was outspokenly critical of
the poor handling of the Temple visit, told PolOff
that MFA Director General for External Security
Affairs Wang Min later pulled her aside and demanded
that she "stop causing trouble."  (Comment: PolOff's
requests on March 28 to venture out alone, as well as
his delivery of USG points on Tibet to both TAR
Chairman Qiangba and MFA VFM Wu, may have prompted
organizers to exclude PolOff from the sensitive
Jokhang trip.  While a simple administrative oversight
cannot be ruled out, when PolOff complained about
being excluded, TAR FAO officials merely insisted that
"everyone was called.") 

More Visits with Victims, Hospitals
----------------------------------- 

18. (C) Following the Jokhang Temple stop (after which
PolOff and others who had missed the Jokhang visit
rejoined the main group), the diplomats visited the
offices of the Chengguan District Government.  While
there, four Tibetans and one Han resident described
the events of March 14.  Several told of having their
stores and homes destroyed, saying they were living on
Government assistance.  Chen Xiaoxiong (a Han Chinese)
told of how her shop was destroyed, causing RMB 2.6
million ($370,000) in damage, and how ethnic Tibetans
had protected her and provided her with shelter. "With
the support of the Party and my friends, I am
confident I can start my life again," Chen said. 

19. (C) This meeting produced the most unscripted
moment of the entire trip:  In response to a question
regarding the composition of the rioters, a Tibetan
resident offered that most were "unemployed."  A
Chengguan District Government official then chimed in
saying that, actually, the rioters were "lazy" people
who refused to work despite abundant opportunities to
participate in Government job-training programs.  The
same official, in contradiction to the TAR Chairman's
comments that prices are stable, said inflation is a
problem and that the Government is providing extra
support for victims to cope with rising costs.  The
group then visited a People's Armed Police hospital
and saw injured PAP officers (both Han and Tibetan),
including some in intensive care beds.  The delegation
then proceeded to Lhasa's Regional People's Hospital.
Outside the second hospital, ambulances with smashed
windows were on display.  Hospital officials relayed a
story that a mob had attacked one ambulance, which was
carrying a small child at the time.  Diplomats later
met with a (Tibetan) doctor injured during the attack
on the ambulance. 

Living Buddhas Denounce "Splittist" Dalai Lama
--------------------------------------------- -- 

20. (C) At the final meeting of the trip (the one
mentioned above that included foreign residents),
diplomats heard a briefing by Tibetan scholars and
religious figures.   The briefing was heavy on
propaganda with an emphasis on Tibet's social and
economic progress since the "peaceful liberation" of
1951.   The primary speaker was Drubkang, the Chairman
of the Tibetan Buddhist Association.  Drupkang, in
response to a question on whether he considered the
Dalai Lama a real living Buddha, gave a lengthy
denunciation of the "unpatriotic" 14th Dalai Lama but 

BEIJING 00001210  008 OF 008 

fell short of denouncing the Dalai Lama's legitimacy
as a reincarnate.  The Dalai Lama's use of violence
runs counter to the key tenets of Buddhism, he said.
Drubkang added that the participation of monks in the
unrest shows that monasteries need to increase their
legal education of young monks.  Another living Buddha
asserted that Western countries should do more to
educate their young people about the "real" situation
in Tibet and counter widespread "prejudice" against
Tibet outside China.  The Government has spent huge
sums rebuilding monasteries and providing medical care
and other benefits to monks, he said, adding that the
only "conflict" in Tibet was the long-standing
struggle between separatists and anti-separatists.
Following this meeting, the delegation departed for
the airport and returned to Beijing. 

Comment
------- 

21. (C) Although some of the events on this trip were
crudely stage managed, it is clear that Lhasa has
suffered widespread ethnic-based violence and rioting.
A large percentage of the population, Han and Tibetan,
have suffered great economic loss, both from the
rioting itself and the cancellation of tour groups.
Despite our hosts' efforts to portray Lhasa as a city
quickly bouncing back, the frantic visit to the
Barkhor/Jokhang Temple, with its heavy security
presence, appeared to indicate that tensions remain
high in the Tibetan quarter of the city. 

22. (C) Comment continued:  Interlocutors' complete
lack of candor regarding the underlying social factors
contributing to the riots, while not unexpected, was
disturbing nonetheless.  Even the "average people"
diplomats met with resorted to stock propaganda
phrases (e.g., "Dalai Lama clique" and "beating,
smashing, looting, burning") while denying Tibetan
society had any problems other than the lingering
presence of a few "separatists."  One Amcit resident
of Lhasa (protect), however, told PolOff during the
trip that he believes the city's Tibetan youths are
becoming "radicalized."  An increasing number of young
Tibetans in Lhasa, he said, become angry when they are
addressed in Mandarin Chinese and refuse to speak
China's official language.  Nevertheless, he and the
other long-term foreign residents PolOff spoke with
appeared to believe that, even if ethnic tensions
remain, tourists will return, NGO projects will go
forward and Lhasa will continue its current path of
rapid, albeit increasingly Han-dominated, development.
RANDIT

TOP-SECRET FROM THE PRESIDENTIAL LIBRARY OF BILL CLINTON: DOMESTIC POLICY COUNCIL BOXES

256_DOMESTIC POLICY COUNCIL BOXES 39-50

WIE AUCH SIE (RUF-)MORD-OPFER DER STASI-“GoMoPa” WERDEN KÖNNEN

hacker VON RUFMÖRDERN u. Serienbetrügern erfundene “GoMoPa SJB”: “Wer stoppt Google Rufmord für Resch, Bennewirtz und Ehlers ?”

Bernd Pulch, Magister Artium, der Publizistik, Germanistik und Komparatistik

Liebe Leser,

nachfolgend ein Gast-Kommentar von meinem Journalisten-Kollegen und ebenfalls “GoMoPa”-STASI-Stalking-Opfer Martin Sachs:

Liebe Leserin, lieber Leser!

Stellen Sie sich bitte kurz vor, dass Sie mit einer tollen Geschäftsidee oder einer Geschäftserweiterung zu mehr Geld kommen möchten. Beispielsweise auch Ihr Unternehmen vergrössern oder gar Ihre Waren exportieren wollen.

Sie werben damit natürlich über die Medien….

Da meldet sich bei Ihnen möglicherweise ein Beauftragter des Finanz-Nachrichtendienstes GoMoPa mit der Mitteilung, dass im GoMoPa-Forum sehr negative Forenbeiträge über Ihre Person oder Ihr Vorhaben stünden. Äusserst Schlimmes wir über Sie berichtet. Zum Beispiel, dass Sie bisher schon Ihr Geld mit betrügerischen Machenschaften verdient hätten oder Ihr Sohn als erfolgreicher Sportler nach neuesten Ermittlungen in einem Kokain-Dealer-Ring verwickelt sei.

Ein anonymer User ( Schreiberling) habe dies geschrieben, wird vom GoMoPa-Beauftragten berichtet. Man könne jetzt noch nicht feststellen, ob dies so wahr sei. Man könne aber auch nicht den Beitrag einfach rausnehmen, denn es könne ja auch was Wahres daran sein!

Falls Sie selbst an der Wahrheitsfindung interessiert seien, könnten Sie auch beim ´seriösen Nachrichtendienst` GoMoPa als Gesellschafter oder als Premium-Mitglied einsteigen, dann könne man ja…..usf. …ganz einfach den Beitrag herausnehmen!

So ähnlich könnte es geschehen und glauben Sie mir: ´Dies ist kein böser Traum,-keine Fata Morgana`, sondern schon Zigtausendmal in der fast 10-Jährigen GoMoPa- Geschichte so abgelaufen.

Wir, von der CSA-Agency, wurden selbst aus Wettbewerbsgründen seit 2002 von GoMoPa auf primitivste Weise im Forum diffamiert oder die von uns als seriöse Dienstleister empfohlenen Unternehmungen wurden per Rufmord mit schmutzigsten, unwahren Verleumdungs-Attacken von anonymen Bloggern ( bezahlte Helfershelfer vom GoMoPa) nahezu ruiniert. Nicht nur finanziell , sondern auch gesundheitlich nieder gemacht! Nicht umsonst heisst es RUFMORD.

Der Begriff ´Stalking` ist da noch eine vornehme Bezeichnung.

Auf gut deutsch passt Rufmord besser.

Geschäftlicher und gesundheitlicher RUFMORD gehört auch entsprechend bestraft.

Die Justiz tut sich sehr schwer damit. Vor allem, wenn die Rufmörder mit Ihren Machenschaften mit Gesellschaften wie z.B. ´GoMoPa` als Briefkastenfirma aus dem Ausland agieren. UND zum anderen, weil sich die Stalking-Terror-Experten von GoMoPa sich mit ihren Methoden auch der Justiz und der Medien bedienen.

Hier beschreibt “GoMoPa” – was sie tun und wie sie es tun.

GoMoPa: Wer stoppt Google-Rufmorde?


Freie Bahn für Rufmord, Stalking und Existenzvernichtung im Internet. Suchmaschinen lassen sich von Kriminellen als Mittäter missbrauchen. Beispiel Google.

Jede Nachricht kann und darf gefaked sein, denn, so erklärt Oliver Klug von der Google-Presseagentur in Hamburg: “Für den Inhalt der Internetseiten ist Google nicht verantwortlich. Jeder Eingriff, außer bei schwerwiegenden Dingen wie Holocaust-Leugnungen, wäre eine unzulässige Zensur.” Das bedeutet im Klartext: Jeder kann mit Hilfe von Google jede nur erdenkliche Lüge über einen anderen Menschen oder über eine Firma verbreiten.

Klug verteidigt das Google-System: “Sie können doch bei der Polizei Anzeige erstatten und Verleumder verklagen. Mit einem Gerichtsurteil löschen wir selbstverständlich die Seiten.” GoMoPa meint: Das klingt gut, ist aber realitätsfern. Die meisten Verleumder arbeiten anonym und melden ihre Hetzseiten unter falschen Angaben an.

Das musste und muss GoMoPa am eigenen Leib erfahren. Der Finanznachrichtendienst wird seit anderthalb Jahren auf der Seite nepper-schlepper-bauernfaenger.com oder fuer-recht-und-ordnung.com mit Lügen von Hausdurchsuchungen, Festnahmen von Verantwortlichen oder angeblicher Strafanzeigen großer Banken überzogen. Natürlich wehrte sich GoMoPa mit juristischen Schritten. Doch der Verantwortliche der Nepper-Schlepper-Seite, die Rechtsanwaltskanzlei Atle Border mit Sitz in Bangkok (Thailand), ist frei erfunden. Der Server steht in Panama. Klug: “Ohne juristische Schritte können wir da nichts machen, das wäre Zensur.”

GoMoPa konfrontierte die Google-Presseagentur daraufhin mit einer konstruierten Verleumdung gegen Google. Inhalt: “Die Verantwortliche (Admin C) der Google Germany GmbH, Frau Lena Tangerxxxx aus Hamburg, führt nicht nur ein dubioses Doppelleben als Domina in der Herbertstraße auf der Reeperbahn. Lena Tangerxxxx steht kurz vor der Verhaftung. Gegen sie wird wegen Schleusung von russischen Minderjährigen nach Deutschland und Vermittlung an einen belgischen Kinderpornoring ermittelt.”

Die Seite könnte “www.google-schmutz.com” heißen. Anmelder wäre ein erfundener Dr. Alfred Motte aus Bangkok, der Server würde in Panama sitzen. Klug: Dagegen würde Google sofort mit rechtlichen Schritten vorgehen.” GoMoPa: Wie denn, wenn Sie den Absender gar nicht finden können? Darauf Klug: “Wir wüden prüfen, inwieweit anonyme Verleumdungen im Internet gegen unsere Nutzungsbestimmungen verstoßen.” Und aller Wahrscheinlichkeit nach sofort löschen?!!

Wird da mit zweierlei Maß gemessen? Google empfiehlt uns jedenfalls lapidar in einer Mitteilung zu unserem Löschantrag, eventuelle Streitigkeiten direkt mit dem Eigentümer der betreffenden Website beizulegen und teilt weiterhin mit, zum gegenwärtigen Zeitpunkt keine Maßnahmen zur Entfernung der verleumdenden Inhalte ergreifen zu wollen. Fortsetzung folgt.

Quelle: GoMoPa (www.gomopa.net / Siegfried Siewert)

DIE ALTEN STASI-TRICK VON “GoMoPa” – FÄLSCHEN, BETRÜGEN, VERTUSCHEN UND RUFMORDEN

Beweis: Wie “GoMoPa” Meridian Capital erpresst hat und Maurischat von Interpol und BKA festgenommen wurde – Verwirrspiele nach STASI-Muster

Nachfolgend bringen wir eine Original-Pressemeldung von „GoMoPa“, dem „NACHRICHTENDIENST“ mit dem Meridian Capital, London, erpresst werden sollte. Der Artikel strotzt nur von Fehlern. Damit ist deutlich, dass „GoMoPa“ tatsäch Meridian Capital erpresst hat und die Aktionen von Meridian Capital sich gegen „GoMoPa“ gerichtet haben.
Die gefälschte Pressemitteilung von Meridian Capital in Bezug auf unser Haus soll von dem „NACHRICHTENDIENST“ „GoMoPa“ ablenken.

„GoMopa“ schreibt:

08.09.2008
Weltweite Finanzierungen mit Widersprüchen

Die Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. gibt an, weltweite Finanzierungen anbieten zu können und präsentiert sich hierbei auf aufwendig kreierten Webseiten. GOMOPA hat die dort gemachten Angaben analysiert und Widersprüche entdeckt.

Der Firmensitz

Der Firmensitz befindet sich laut eigener Aussage in Dubai, Vereinigte Arabische Emirate. In einem GOMOPA vorliegenden Schreiben der Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. heißt es jedoch, der Firmensitz sei in London. Auf der Homepage des Unternehmens taucht die Geschäftsadresse in der Londoner Old Broad Street nur als „Kundenabteilung für deutschsprachige Kunden“ auf. Eine weitere Adresse in der englischen Hauptstadt, diesmal in der Windsor Avenue, sei die „Abteilung der Zusammenarbeit mit Investoren“.

Die Meridian Capital Enterprises ist tatsächlich als „Limited“ (Ltd.) mit Sitz in England und Wales eingetragen. Aber laut Firmenhomepage hat das Unternehmen seinen „rechtlichen Geschäftssitz“ in Dubai. Eine Abfrage beim Gewerbeamt Dubais (DED) zu dieser Firmierung bleibt ergebnislos.

Bemerkenswert ist auch der vermeintliche Sitz in Israel. Auf der Webseite von Meridian Capital Enterprises heißt es: „Die Firma Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. ist im Register des israelischen Justizministeriums unter der Nummer 514108471, gemäß dem Gesellschaftsrecht von 1999, angemeldet.“ Hierzu Martin Kraeter, Gomopa-Partner und Prinzipal der KLP Group Emirates in Dubai: „Es würde keinem einzigen Emirati – geschweige denn einem Scheich auch nur im Traum einfallen, direkte Geschäfte mit Personen oder Firmen aus Israel zu tätigen. Und schon gar nicht würde er zustimmen, dass sein Konterfei auch noch mit vollem Namen auf der Webseite eines Israelischen Unternehmens prangt.“

Auf der Internetseite sind diverse Fotos mit Scheichs an Konferenztischen zu sehen. Doch diese großen Tagungen und großen Kongresse der Meridian Capital Enterprises werden in den Pressearchiven der lokalen Presse Dubais mit keinem Wort erwähnt.
Martin Kraeter: „ Ein ‚britisch-arabisch-israelisches bankfremdes Finanzinstitut sein zu wollen, wie die Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. es darstellt, ist mehr als zweifelhaft. So etwas gibt es schlicht und ergreifend nicht! Der Nahostkonflikt schwelt schon seit mehr als 50 Jahren. Hier in den Vereinigten Arabischen Emiraten (VAE) werden Israelis erst gar nicht ins Land gelassen. Israelische Produkte sind gebannt. Es gibt nicht einmal direkte Telefonverbindungen. Die VAE haben fast 70% der Wiederaufbaukosten des Libanon geschultert, nachdem Israel dort einmarschiert ist.“

Zwei angebliche Großinvestitionen der Meridian Capital Enterprises in Dubai sind Investmentruinen bzw. erst gar nicht realisierte Projekte. Das Unternehmen wirbt mit ihrer finanziellen Beteiligung an dem Dubai Hydropolis Hotel und dem Dubai Snowdome.

Der Aktivitätsstatus der Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. ist laut englischen Handelsregister (UK Companies House) „dormant“ gemeldet. Auf der Grundlage des englischen Gesellschaftsrechts können sich eingetragene Unternehmen selbst „dormant“ (schlafend) melden, wenn sie keine oder nur unwesentliche buchhalterisch zu erfassende Transaktionen vorgenommen haben. Dies ist angesichts der angeblichen globalen Investitionstätigkeit der Meridian Capital Ltd. sehr erstaunlich.

Der Webauftritt

Die Internetseite der MCE ist sehr aufwendig gestaltet, die Investitionen angeblich in Millionen- und Milliardenhöhe. Bei näherer Betrachtung der Präsentationselemente fällt jedoch auf, dass es sich bei zahlreichen veröffentlichen Fotos, die Veranstaltungen der Meridian Capital Enterprises dokumentieren sollen, meist um Fotos von Online-Zeitungen oder frei zugänglichen Medienfotos einzelner Institutionen handelt wie z.B. der Börse Dubai.

Auf der Internetpräsenz befinden sich Videofilmchen, die eine frappierende Ähnlichkeit mit dem Werbematerial von NAKHEEL aufweisen, dem größten Bauträger der Vereinigten Arabischen Emirate. Doch den schillernden Videos über die berühmten drei Dubai Palmen „Jumeirah, Jebel Ali und Deira“ oder das Archipel „The World“ wurden offensichtlich selbstproduzierte Trailersequenzen der Meridian Capital Enterprises vorangestellt. Doch könnte es sich bei den Werbevideos um Fremdmaterial handeln.

Auch die auf der Webseite wahllos platzierten Fotos von bekannten Sehenswürdigkeiten Dubais fungieren als Augenfang für den interessierten Surfer mit eigenem Finanzierungswunsch. Bei einem Volumen von 10 Millionen Euro oder höher präsentiert sich die Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. als der passende Investitionspartner. Das Unternehmen verfügt weltweit über zahlreiche Standorte: Berlin, London, Barcelona, Warschau, Moskau, Dubai, Riad, Tel Aviv, Hong Kong und New York. Aber nahezu alle Standorte sind lediglich Virtual Offices eines global arbeitenden Büroservice-Anbieters. „Virtual Office“ heißt im Deutschen schlicht „Briefkastenfirma“. Unter solchen Büroadressen sollen laut Meridian Capital Enterprises ganze Kommissionen ansässig sein, alles zum Wohle des Kunden.“

Zitatende

Dies ist das altbekannte Muster des „NACHRCHTENDIENSTES“ „GoMoPa“ und seiner Berliner und Hamburger Komplizen Falschmeldungen zu verbreiten, um Firmen und Personen erpressen oder ausschalten zu können.


Aktenzeichen ST/0148943/2011: Immer wieder verfremden die vorbestraften Serienbetrüger Pressemeldungen von uns und der SJB-GoMoPa-Opfer (http://www.sjb-fonds-opfer.com) und verfälschen sie, um Verwirrung zu stiften und von ihren eigenen Taten abzulenken. Die persönlichen Angriffe gegen mich und andere Personen aus meinem Umfeld, sollen uns dazu bewegen, die kritischen Berichte über die Cyber-Stasi des 21. Jahrhunderts und deren Hintermänner einzustellen, sowie sie zuvor viele andere Journalisten eingeschüchtert haben, so dass deren Beiträge dann gelöscht wurden. Im Interesse aller Marktteilnehmer werden wir das ganz gewiss NICHT tun. Dies ist uns vielmehr ein Ansporn und eine Verpflichtung, die Öffentlichkeit über das Treiben der Cybermörder und wohl auch realen Mörder aufzuklären, damit diesen Stasi-Verbrechern, das Handwerk gelegt wird und sie nicht noch mehr rechtschaffene Menschen mit ihrem hahnebüchernen Unsinn verleumden, erpressen, betrügen und sie dann sogar ermorden können. Deshalb hier noch einmal zur Klarstellung: Der vorbestrafte Erpresser, Betrüger und wohl auch mutmassliche Mörder Heinz Gerlachs Klaus-Dieter Maurischat ist auf der Flucht.

Bereits einmal, im Dezember 2008, wurde er in Berlin auf Betreiben von Meridian Capital festgenommen. Zuvor sind er und sein mutmasslicher Komplize laut Meridian Capital bereits 23 verurteilt worden. Dokumente hierzu unter: http://sjb-fonds-opfer.com/?page_id=11764 Näheres zu Maurischat: Über eine selbstgebaute Blogseite verbreiten die GoMoPa-Gangster eine gefälschte Stellung von Meridian Capital, um Verwirrung zu stiften. Diese Blogseite existiert erst seit Deztember 2010. Beweis: http://www.hypestat.com/pressreleaser.org Die Meridian Capital-Seite, das Original, http://othergomopa.blogspot.com/ ist dagegen bereits seit 2009 online Beweis: Aussage Meridian Capital und KLAUS DIETER MAURISCHAT IN DETENTION

Source: http://klaus-dieter-maurischat.blogspot.com/2009/01/klaus-dieter-maurischat-in-haft.html Hinzu kommt Verurteilung wegen Betruges am eigenen Anleger sowie die Kursmanipulation in Sachen Wirecard etc pp.- Hier exemplarisch die Verurteilung wegen Betruges am eigenen Anleger: Klaus Maurischat und Mark Vornkahl, Betreiber vonwww.gomopa.net: Am 24. April 2006 war die Verhandlung am Amtsgericht Krefeld in der Betrugssache: Mark Vornkahl / Klaus Maurischat ./. Dehnfeld. Aktenzeichen: 28 Ls 85/05 Klaus MaurischatLange Straße 3827313 Dörverden.Das in diesem Verfahren ausschließlich diese Betrugsache verhandelt wurde, ist das Urteil gegen Klaus Maurischat recht mäßig ausgefallen.

SATURDAY, JULY 11, 2009

KLAUS DIETER MAURISCHAT IN DETENTION

Source: http://klaus-dieter-maurischat.blogspot.com/2009/01/klaus-dieter-maurischat-in-haft.html
KLAUS DIETER MAURISCHAT IN HAFT – DownloadGerman VersionHere is a Google Translation (German -> English)

Sunday 18 Januar 2009 January 2009

KLAUS DIETER MAURISCHAT IN DETENTIONMeridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. unveils new criminal phenomena in network I. SachverhaltIn recently appeared on the net more often at the same time a new a very worrying phenomenon of criminal nature. Professional criminals groups in the network are taking part, to extortion, fraud, Erschwindeln relating to certain specifically selected companies and businesses are capable of. These criminals developed new methods and means, simply and in a short time to bereichern.Strategien and manifestations, which underlie this process are fairly simple. A criminal is looking to “carefully” on the Internet specific companies and corporations (victims of crime) and informed them in the next step, that of the business activities of such companies and corporations in the near future – first on the Internet then in other available mass media – numerous and very unfavorable information appears. At the same time, the criminals beat their future victims an effective means of reducing unnecessary difficulties and problems to escape the loss of good name and image of the company and corporate sector. These offenders are aware of that reputation, name and appearance of each company is a value in itself. It was therefore a value of what each company is prepared to pay any price. But the reason for difficulties and problems arising from the loss of good name and reputation result. The criminals and their victims are already aware that this loss is devastating consequences might have been the closing down of a particular business can enforce. It takes both to No as well as at large companies regard. The company is concerned that in virtually every industry in each country and cross-border activities sind.Das criminal procedure in the form of a blackmail on money, a fraud is becoming rapidly and globally, ie led cross-border and internationally. Among the victims of extortion, fraud is now looking both at home (domestic) and international corporations, the major emphasis on conservation, keeping and maintaining their reputation in the business according to their credibility lay. The criminals in the network have understood that maintaining an unassailable reputation and name of a company the unique ability to provide fast and easy enrichment forms. The above-mentioned criminal procedure is difficult to track because it is international in nature, and by overlapping or even nonexistent (fictional) professional and judicial persons in various countries and operated company wird.Diese offenders in the network publish it and disseminate false information about your victims on remote servers, which are not uncommon in many exotic countries. There are those countries in which serious gaps in the legal system, investigative and prosecution procedures are visible. As an example, at this point mention India werden. Mit criminals working in the network grid portals known leader of blogs with your seat-consciously or unconsciously, even in highly developed countries. For example, at this point, countries such as Germany, Austria, Switzerland, the United States, Britain, Spain or Portugal are mentioned. The below listed criminals were able to act unpunished today. As a symptom of such action appears here the activity and “effectiveness” of the company GOMOPA, which is on countries such as Germany, Switzerland, Austria, the United States, Britain, Spain and India. A good example of such an action is Mr. Klaus Mauri Chat – the leader and “brain” of the company GOMOPA with many already in force and criminal judgments “on his account”, which in this way for years and funded its maintenance in the industry almost unlimited activity. This status will change dramatically, however, including far and wide thanks to discontinued operations of the firm Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. who would oppose such offenses addressed in the network. Other companies and corporations, in which the crime network and outside of this medium have fallen victim to contribute to combating such crimes bei.Die situation is changing, thanks to effective steps and the successful cooperation of the firm Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. with the international police Interpol, with the federal agency (FBI) in the U.S., the Federal Criminal Police in Germany, with Scotland Yard in Britain, as well as with the Russian secret service FSB.Die Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. – Together with other companies and cooperations, the victim of criminal activities of the network of crime have fallen – has undeniably already started to yield results. The fact that in recent weeks (November 2008) on the territory of the Federal Republic of Germany of the above-mentioned leaders and “brain” of the company GOMOPA, Mr Klaus Maurishat was arrested should not be ignored. The Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. information available results clearly show that the next arrests of persons participating in this process in such countries as: Austria, Switzerland, Russia, Ukraine, Poland, Spain, Mexico, Portugal, Brazil, the USA, Canada, UK, Ireland , Australia, New Zealand and made in a.. The ultimate goal of Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. and the other victims of crime in the network is to provide all participants in this criminal procedure before the competent court to lead. All professional and judicial persons, regardless of the seat and out of the business, which the above-described criminal action (fraud, extortion) to have fallen victim can of Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. led company to join the goal set at all at this point the procedure described those associated in the public and the economic life out. II blacklist blackmail and with international fraudsters and their methods (opus operandi) in the following countries: 1 The Federal Republic Deutschland2. Dubai 3rd Russia 1st The Federal Republic of Germany GmbH GOMOPA, Goldman Morgenstern & Partners LLC., Goldman Morgenstern & Partners Consulting LLC, Wottle collection. In these firms are quite active following persons: – Klaus Mauri Chat ( “Father” and “brain” of the criminal organization responsible for countless final judgments have been achieved (arrested in Germany in November 2008) – Josef Rudolf Heckel ( “right hand “when Mr Klaus Mauri chat, denounced former banker who is excessive in many Bankschmuggeleien was involved.(Today, persona non grata in the German banking industry); – Peter Reski (responsible for Finance, known for fraud, tax fraud and embezzlement, which is already behind the judgments are final) – Mark Vornkahl (responsible for organizational and administrative tasks in GOMOPA, a former police officer dismissed because of numerous expectations in the service, already has a few final judgments “on his account”); – Claus i Ulrike Wottle (married couple, for the so-called “unconventional” enforcement of the debt for the benefit GOMOPA. This execution was imposing, with extortion violence based on both real and fictitious debts references? How does the system of GOMOPADie above-mentioned persons in Brief, as well as with the service GOMOPA cooperating, so-called “experts GOMOPA” Bloggers and all other professional and legal persons choose from all possible sources of information about large, rich companies and corporations coming in various domestic and international sectors of the economy. GOMOPA The service is particularly keen that those aussucht, the “in itself visible.” Those companies corporations and, therefore, against the relatively easy and without much effort himself, inconsistencies, etc. can be done in terms of the even crimes such as cheating and Erschwindeln Others can easily perform. It is well known that every company especially good at their presence and her name is inviolable. Each company will do everything according to their good presence also retain its credibility to be. But if the victim of GOMOPA and his “partner” and a large range of businesses, so it is possible to call such companies a quick, easy, and even considerably enriched. It appears at this point the question: Which clever criminals in the network and outside the network to me is success, it does not wish to benefit? The criminals in the network know that without business credibility there is no confidence that any business is essential. GOMOPA and all are cooperating with the security of all possible methods and measures mastered how to credibility and confidence of a company, a company, corporation (crime victims) in question. This moves just the attention of the user, so that the homepage of the GOMOPA http://www.gomopa.net in search engines like Google, Yahoo is easy to find. This, in turn, means nothing other than additional profits for the service GOMOPA because of its activity around a media discourse created wird.Ein at first glance commonplace and easy victims of extortion, for example, can a public governmental body, which, based on the credibility of public works, such as a bank or a foreign bank financial institution. So it was with the foreign banks, international financial institution Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. the case. A simple and easy victims of illicit profits and material may include insurance companies, where – as it is from our search results, much to the criminal activities of the GOMOPA especially in the area of the Federal Republic of Germany, Switzerland and Austria was due. Among the known and identifiable victims is certainly German, Austrian and Swiss banks, insurance companies such as Allianz of Germany, German and Austrian companies such as HDI and DKV visible. This is what the service GOMOPA trust and what with the cooperating services, blogs nowadays practice is the so-called cyber-stalking, which rapidly spread in the network. The method is criminal at this point and others in the threat that the business of an enterprise (Ofer blackmail, threats and forcible ) fictitious, even non-existent information (lies, rumors, stories, statements, insults) on the net first then in other mass media. This is only used to a potential victim to move a considerable sum of money for the so-called “peace “the blackmailer available. The” quiet “here means the promise of access lock with respect to the fictitious publication of any information on the net and in all other mass media, the victims of extortion in extremely negative light showing. Such threats are, as already above the goal of companies – potential victims of cyber-stalking to do likewise, that they themselves “buy.” In short, GOMOPA and his peers, and cooperating with those services, and blogs, create a “virtual reality”, or otherwise said publishing fictitious information on potential victims of a crime. firms and corporations, against which threats and extortion by GOMOPA are not due, ie those who for so-called “peace” does not want to pay, to be victims of serious lies, insults, and Insinuationen other criminal misappropriations, the appearance and presence of a firm with certainty. One is a target of GOMOPA, namely as fast and as easy as it goes, money abzukassieren, and if a company refuses, and the “peace” do not buy wishes, it is unexpectedly and quickly become an object of extortion and defamation on the net. At this point the following question arises: How is it possible that the leader of the firm GOMOPA, Mr Klaus Mauri chat, only in the Federal Republic of Germany on his account “23 court rulings, has for many years as an honest citizen to create, while other persons, firms, corporations criminal acts, offenses memorize, in addition to substantial sums of money could earn? This complex process can only be explained as follows: GOMOPA creates his appearance, his presence in the eyes of public opinion as an honest subject, against which pathological phenomena in the public and economic life einschreitet. GOMOPA and his partner (services, blogs) present themselves as followers of any Verbrechensart that promise so the fight against criminals in each virtual network ( especially against any cheaters, blackmailers). GOMOPA used in this respect a kind of “Merketingsvorhang” as a method of seduction, a result which is his true “face” and his true intentions than that of a fraudster and blackmail on money can hide. The true intentions of the GOMOPA, of working together GOMOPA Services and blogs were until today no doubt with success before the public opinion will remain hidden, especially thanks to the so-called “smoke curtain”, which reflects the fact that man himself as a “winner” of any abuse and any pathological appearance of the public and economic life in Aland German, Austria, Switzerland, the United States, Britain, Russia, Spain created. Next appears the GOMOPA forward by the person on which companies and corporations – the future victims of the crime that is – against the possibility of the release of extremely poor and the company concerned in a negative light visual information on the Internet and other mass media warns. The person from whom the speech is also informed that they are successful against such a procedure for a “fee” can be used. The GOMOPA is at this point up to the extortion of money for so-called “peace” to the company and corporation (the victim of a crime) around. Most of the companies concerned to such threats did not respond, because it’s everyday life and their agenda. It finally barely missing on the web of blackmail and outside of the medium. Normally so seldom so-called “understanding”, while on the one hand, the crime victim, on the other hand, the GOMOPA occurs. It is understandable that the price for such an “understanding” means the provision of the requested funds would GOMOPA. The financial blackmail in this stage is rarely enforced. The situation changes little, however, if the firms and corporations (crime victims) find that the threat was fulfilled. In Brief will appear on the homepage http://www.gomopa.net numerous newspaper articles, reports and bogus pseudo market analysis, both by GOMOPA as well as so-called “independent experts” and the company will be represented, with formal or fictitious GOMOPA together. Information published here, correspond to the contents of a threat and make the operations of firms and corporations in an extremely negative light dar. There is no doubt that such actions and methods only to harm the good name and good presence of these firms and corporations prerogatives. The activity of GOMOPA is certainly not exhausted. GOMOPA disseminated (published accommodates) the above information in the network by the credible, and popular opinion-operated services. Moreover, GOMOPA threatens the companies and corporations (its victims), that “from the finger-drawn” information not only on the network, but also on television and on radio and in the press landscape erscheinen.Wie the experience and expertise of the former Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. show that the services are usually not aware that they are for the purpose of a criminal action by the GOMOPA used. They agree with the corresponding fictitious publications, reports and analysis on what specifically GOMOPA through and through “independent” experts are prepared. It also states that the services, and blogs such cooperation with the GOMOPA approval, although they know that the information transmitted by GOMOPA are fictitious and the credibility of companies and corporations affect. They take so aware of the criminal procedure part. The explanation of this situation is quite simple. GOMOPA pays namely the services, and blogs related remuneration that the publication of false information on the companies and corporations (crime victims) agree. Some services, and blogs seem to know nothing about it to have that on their pages available information “fictitious” and “pulled out of the fingers are. Are you looking for in this way their conduct to justify, because they want the legal consequences of participating in the abuse of the good name and appearance of a company or corporation to escape. The activity system of GOMOPA of collaborating services and blogs was also the example of Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. tested. Beginning in October 2008 was one of the workers of Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. a message from an anonymous sender, in the near future – first on the Internet, then on television, radio and in the German press – information published by the functioning and activities of Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. in an extremely negative light show. The employee of Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. was then informed that these reports / news undoubtedly significantly the appearance and the reputation of the firm Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. affect. The place mentioned in this “conversation partner” has the workers of Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. informed that the possibility of the embarrassing situation to be avoided by Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. to the person shown by the account the sum of 100,000.00 EUR transfers. As later revealed, however, was Mr. Klaus Mauri Chat – this anonymous interlocutor – “brain” and “Leader of the GOMOPA”. The investigations have been employed by the Federal Judicial Police (tracking and identifying the body at the federal level) during the investigation for the payment of blackmail, fraud and threats because of what Mr Mauri chatting and his staff were practiced, and for participation by other (head of Internet services and moderators of blogs) on this process. These crimes have been committed to loss of many professional and judicial persons, including the Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. The victims of this crime in Germany, Austria, Switzerland, Spain, Portugal, Great Britain, the USA and Canada visible. At this moment appeared the following question: What was the reaction of Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. to the demands from GOMOPA? Corresponded to the response to the expectations of GOMOPA? Has the Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. the required sum of EUR 100,000.00 paid? Side of Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. There was absolutely no reaction to the extortion attempt by GOMOPA. At the end of August 2008 on the Service http://www.gompa.net numerous articles / reports published by the activities of Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. in a very negative light have represented. Once the information contained on http://www.gomopa.net detail and were fully analyzed, it is that they are not even the truth at one point and potential and existing customers of Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. in relation to the financial institution from this discontinued business activities is misleading. Following the criminal Handlugen of GOMOPA and its cooperating services, and blogs on the network, the Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. measurable and significant business losses. The Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. has primarily an important group of potential customers lost. But what it showed as important, the existing customers of Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. little away. Those customers have used our services and continue to use the still. In view of the existing collaboration with the Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.., Which will in turn be no objections. GOMOPA has such a course of events accurately predicted, which aims significant and measurable business by Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. losses were suffered. The course of events, the service GOMOPA certainly pleased. GOMOPA has to expect that the position of Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. declines and the financial institution, the required sum (100.000,00 EUR) provides. Over time, as the whole procedure in the network was becoming more popular, tried GOMOPA still four times to the Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. Contacts, each time by adjusting these criminal “Kompanie” has promised, although it every time his financial demands heraufsetzte. The last of the set of “company” against Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. ratio was even planned EUR 5,000,000.00 (in words: EURO fünfmilionen). The Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. could but before the ever-increasing demands from the Service GOMOPA claim. In October 2008 met the management of Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. Decision on the notification of the INTERPOL International Police and the appropriate law enforcement institutions of the FRG (the police and the prosecutor) about the existing situation. In the meantime, reported at the Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. numerous companies and corporations, and even professional person such as doctors, judges, priests, actors and other people from different countries of the world, the extortion of GOMOPA relented and the required amounts of money it had. These people already gave statements that they have done so, so they finally just “be in peace” and unnecessary problems, difficulties, and a reasonable conclusion hardly avoid them. The victims of this criminal action, the Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. using different amounts of money which were requested, informed. In one case, there were relatively small (a few thousand EURO), in another case it has to deliver significant amounts (around few million EURO). Additionally turned to Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. Companies which have not yet GOMOPA the “fee” on out and have already considered whether they should do or not. These firms anticipated by Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. a clear opinion as well as a practical professional advice on how to be in such a situation should behave and how they can avoid debt. The Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. has invariably victims of all crimes, which are at our company have made a cooperation proposed. The top task is to this cooperation, jointly determined and effective measures against GOMOPA against other services in the network, and against all Bloggers to meet in the here described with international criminal procedure GOMOPA leaders to participate. All these companies were known as the Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. proposed “crusade” against GOMOPA, his partner. At our request to notify all participating companies the INTERPOL International Police and their pursuit of domestic institutions, including the competent public prosecutor and the police authorities about the existing situation. In view of the fact that the criminal act of GOMOPA be extended over many states and that the number of the Federal Republic of Germany because the ads reimbursed by GOMOPA, Internet Services and Bloggers crimes, grew up fast – which no doubt influenced by a far-reaching impact of criminal of GOMOPA testifies – International Business, the Police INTERPOL Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. before that its representatives in Berlin with representatives from GOMOPA true to the “payment arrangements and transfer the sum of EUR 5,000,000.00 to discuss. This step meant a well thought-out and by the Federal Criminal Police organized the event to carry out aimed at the arrest of international criminals GOMOPA acting was. The coordinated steps and measures of Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. Damaged and others, led by the International Economic Police INTERPOL, the Federal Criminal Police Office and the Prosecutor of the Federal Republic of Germany for education, training and implementation of the above-described case contributed. In November 2008, the event in Berlin prepared for the apprehension and arrest of the representative of the GOMOPA, after the arrest of Mr. Klaus Mauri chat – as the main leaders and leaders of international criminal group GOMOPA recalled. The arrest and notified the Federal Criminal Police showed both the current whereabouts of Mr. Klaus Mauri chat. “Brain” and the founder of this international criminal group GOMOPA, Mr Klaus Mauri chat on the same day was also arrested and imprisoned on time, will soon put in charge state, the responsibility for their own crimes and those of the forum, before a competent GOMOPA Federal wear. The Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. undertook all possible steps to ensure that Mr. Klaus Mauri chatting on the dock of the competent court of the United Kingdom of Great Britain appears. Among the damaged work and justice people from United Kingdom, along with the Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. There are many victims of GOMOPA: The beginning of the arrests with such a scale means for the German judiciary and a major breakthrough point. It is worth noting that the prosecution bodies of the Federal Republic, up to this stage of the long-standing criminal activity of Mr. Klaus Mauri chatting and his staff were powerless. Prolonged impunity of the criminal actions of Mr. Klaus Mauri chat, for years the “first violin” in GOMOPA played, is to end gegangen.An this point another question arises: how is it so go on? The arrest of Mr. Klaus chat Mauri is a critical moment, in other words a “turn around 180 degrees” for him personally. But it also means the beginning of the end “for its employees, for Internet Services, Bloggers, with GOMOPA so happy and had worked together without contradiction. There is no doubt that the cause of Mr Klaus Mauri chat at the top of the “iceberg” is. The above-mentioned turning point on this issue will be further arrests and detentions of members GOMOPA bring with them, and all persons from all areas involved in this transnational criminal actions have taken part. For information (reports by the end of December 2008), which of Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. available, the result that the next arrests currently prepared to be associated with the Services GOMOPA cooperating persons. This is to people outside Germany – from where Mr Klaus Mauri chat coming – refer. The details may be at this point in terms of legal and course of the prosecution bodies of the BRG and the Interpol-led investigation can not be betrayed. The Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. currently can only illustrate information from the investigation led the public to the criminal liability not to have this moment wird.In so intense preparations for the arrest of a number of persons outside the Federal Republic of Germany. This applies particularly to countries such as the following: – Russia-Ukraine – Poland – Spain – Mexico – Portugal – Brazil – the United States of America – Canada – UK – Ireland – Australia – New Zealand – India. All professional and judicial persons, regardless of the country in which they accompany the Office, or its citizens, and until now, consciously or unconsciously with the Forum GOMOPA together, or continue to work together to arouse the suspicion of the INTERPOL International Police. This works with the police criminal investigation department in each country, to the above persons first identify and then to legally pursue them. Information about this topic, as well as on the beginning and end of the activity of the GOMOPA can be at the following addresses on the Web at: http://gomopaabzocker.wordpress.com/http://www.nepper-schlepper-bauernfaenger.comhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qNpzAu-QMuEhttp://www.korte.de/alexander/2006/01/gomopa-finanforum-kritik.html- http://evelux.de/gomopa-sam-240/- http://blog.deobald.org/archive/2007/07/01/betrugsvorwurf-gomopa-spam/ 2. Dubai KLP Group Emirates – United Arab Emirates. As head of the company is Mr Martin Kraeter, not only as the “brain” of the whole company, but also as a longstanding friend of Mr Klaus Mauri Chat (GOMOPA-wire) acts. This company wants to hide and not even officially exist, that they as a strategic partner of the GOMOPA in the area of the Middle East, according to the territory of the Persian coast operates. Official activities of the company KLP Group Emirates includes among others the following areas: financial advisory services from the offshore area (Management Services – Facilitators – OffshoreConsultants, International Tax & Legal Consultants – Fiduciaries). In the sphere of activities of the Company will include the creation of companies and enterprises in the so-called “tax havens” to the tax liability to the company activity entfliehen.Inoffizielle KLP Group Emirates includes cooperation with the Service GOMOPA in the field of “Gelwäsche”. The monies are a result of criminal activity by GOMOPA generated by advanced professional and judicial persons soon throughout the world and legalized. The illegality based on the activity of the company KLP Group Emirates, as well as the cooperation with the Services GOMOPA attracted attention even when the prosecution organs of the United Kingdom of Great Britain, especially in Scotland Yard, which on this issue an intensive investigation has begun, which is in the ” development phase is located. It must be noted that all professional and judicial persons, but especially the clients of the company KLP Group Emirates, with the company KLP Group Emirates have cooperated in the past and still do, under the “Lupp” of Scotland Yard to be .3. Russlanda) The Company E-XECUTIVE by the Lord led Novosartow Vilen. On the homepage of the Company contained information comes directly from the company GOMOPA. The company e XECUTIVE leads the close cooperation not only with GOMOPA, but also with another on the Russian territory under the name of OOO UK broker functioning company. The company e XECUTIVE in connection with the company OOO UK broker is a member of a criminal group led by GOMOPA. The company e XECUTIVE GOMOPA representing interests in Russia and Central-Eastern Europe. Unofficially, the company employs E XECUTIVE-especially with the search for potential “victims” of the Erschwindelns, blackmail and forcing the funds for GOMOPA companies and corporations from the territory of Russia, Ukraine, and from all countries in Central Eastern Europe. Officially, the company e XECUTIVE one to the forum GOMOPA similar industrial activity. b) OOO “UK broker.” Head of the firm is Mr. Pavel Kokarev. This company is not concealed, that they are consistent with the Forum GOMOPA cooperates. The company OOO UK broker represents GOMOPA in Central Eastern Europe, including Russia. You shall be officially transferred to this area the GOMOPA similar activity, but unofficially it is to search for potential “victims” of racketeering, fraud and Erschwindelns for GOMOPA employed. The company has remained until now spared from any punishment, it could with “eternal impunity” because of a poorly developed, corrupt legal system in Russia expected. The situation may change after Mr. Klaus Mauri Chat arrested in Berlin and was arrested. This constant offenders, the “on his account” a set of legally enforceable judgments has, until now his freedom has unlimited recover, the do not know quite what it means to be arrested, begins gradually, according to our available information to finally “to bear witness.” This is understandable when one considers the threat of a penalty he considered. This delinquent shows growing interest in cooperation with the German tracking and identifying bodies. So there is a chance that other people he unveiled to the public by providing for reduction of prison sentence counts. It is also the only question of time INTERPOL, in cooperation with the Russian Service (FSB) of the Company OOO UK broker “at the door knocking”, which by Mr. Pavle Kokarev and represented. The company OOO UK broker has a virtual office in REGUS building in Moscow, is not even a person, forming a typical one-person company, which all business “crimes” may be the name of it, with no civil liability to pay. The Lord Pavel Kokarev seems to have forgotten or do not have sufficient knowledge about its possible responsibility fier to participate in the international crimes under the direction of Gomopa.

TOP-SECRET FROM THE ARCHIVES OF THE FBI: Original Knights of the KKK – Ku-Klux-Klan

105-71809 -241- pages 1-249

105-71809 -241- pages 250-350

TOP-SECRET FROM THE FBI-ARCHIVES:Senator Edward Moore “Ted” Kennedy

1136317-002 – 175A-WF-389 – Section 1 -942748

1136317-002 – 9-HQ-51213 – Section 1 -942755

1136317-002 – 9-HQ-51213 – Section 2 -942756

1136317-002 – 9-HQ-51213 EBF 2 – Section 1 -942759

1136317-002 – 9-HQ-51213 EBF 10 – Section 1 -942758

1136317-002 – 62-BS-4994 – Section 1 -942749

1136317-002 – 62-BS-5078 – Section 1 -942750

1136317-002 – 62-HQ-112941 – Section 1 -942752

1136317-002 – 62-HQ-112941 – Section 2 -942753

1136317-002 – 62-HQ-112941 – Section 3 -942754

1136317-002 – 62-HQ-112941 – Section 4 -942751

1136317-002 – 89-PX-250 – Section 1 -942746

1136317-002 – 94-HQ-55752 – Section 1 -942760

1136317-002 – 94-HQ-55752 – Section 2 -942761

1136317-002 – 94-HQ-55752 – Section 3 -942762

1136317-002 – 94-HQ-55752 – Section 4 -942763

1136317-002 – 94-HQ-55752 EBF 25 – Section 1 -942766

1136317-002 – 94-HQ-55752 EBF 95 – Section 1 -942767

1136317-003 – 197-BS-71824 -HQ- – Section 1 -967633- pages 250-290

1136317-003 – 197-BS-71824 -HQ- – Section 2 -967634

1136317-003 – 197-SL-178651 – Section 1 -967623- pages 1-249

1136317-003 – 197-BS-71824 -HQ- – Section 2 -967634

1136317-003 – 197-SL-178651 – Section 1 -967623- pages 1-249

1136317-003 – 197-SL-178651 – Section 2 -967624

Kennedy Part 19

kennedy23-24 pages 1-249

kennedy23-24 pages 250-396

Edward Moore “Ted” Kennedy (1932-2009) served as a U.S. senator from 1962 to 2009. The files below range from 1961 to 2001. The bulk of this material concerns FBI investigations into threats of violence and extortion claims against Senator Kennedy and other public officials. Parts 1 to 18 were previously released in 2010.

TOP-SECRET FROM THE CIA-ARCHIVES: Wartime Statutes – Instruments of Soviet Control- PART 2

1979_11_28_WARTIME_STATUTE_OF_THE_COMBINED_FORCES
1980_02_07_WARTIME_STATUTE

1980_02_08_STATUTE_ON_THE_COMBINED_FORCES_OF_THE_WARSAW_PACT

1980_02_21_TWELFTH_SESSION1980_02_25_DRAFT_STATUTE_ON_WARSAW_PACT_COMBINED_NAMED_FORCES

STRENG GEHEIM: DIREKTIVE DES INNENMINISTERIUMS ZUM SPERREN KINDERPORNOGRAPHISCHER SEITEN WIE “GoMoPa4KIDS”

german-interior-ministry-internet-expertise-1009

TOP-SECRET: NEW WAZIRISTAN TERRORIST ALLIANCE

P 041421Z MAR 09
FM AMEMBASSY ISLAMABAD
TO SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 1740
INFO AMEMBASSY KABUL PRIORITY
AMEMBASSY NEW DELHI PRIORITY
AMCONSUL PESHAWAR PRIORITY
AMCONSUL KARACHI PRIORITY
AMCONSUL LAHORE PRIORITY
USCINCCENT MACDILL AFB FL PRIORITY
CIA WASHDC PRIORITY
JOINT STAFF WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY
NSC WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY
USCENTCOM INTEL CEN MACDILL AFB FL PRIORITY
S E C R E T ISLAMABAD 000478 

NOFORN 

E.O. 12958: DECL: 03/04/2034
TAGS: PREL PTER PK
SUBJECT: NEW WAZIRISTAN TERRORIST ALLIANCE 

Classified By: Anne W. Patterson, reasons 1.4 (b) and (d). 

1. (S/NF) Summary: Rival Pakistani Taliban leaders Baitullah
Mehsud, Maulvi Nazir, and Hafiz Gul Bahadur formed a new
militant alliance on February 23. The new alliance
recognizes Taliban leader Mullah Omar as its leader, and its
goal is to fight the planned U.S. troop surge in Afghanistan.
The Pakistani militant leaders will maintain their
independent militants groups but will now facilitate
cooperation in cross-border attacks in Afghanistan. It is
too early to say how effective this new alliance will be in
launching cross-border attacks against U.S./NATO forces in
Afghanistan, but it does give the largest and most powerful
Pakistani Taliban leaders unfettered access across North and
South Waziristan. Formation of the alliance demonstrates
that the GOP's tribal "divide and conquer" strategy is not
working, at least not to our advantage. Civilian leaders are
concerned about the continuing loss of government writ in the
Waziristans after this agreement, but Pakistan's security
forces may see few downsides to an alliance that focuses its
attacks outside of Pakistan. End summary. 

2. (SBU) On February 23, Tehreek-e-Taliban (TTP) leader
Baitullah Mehsud signed a deal with two powerful rival
Taliban commanders Maulvi Nazir of South Waziristan and Hafiz
Gul Bahadur of North Waziristan. The three, according to
press reports, have formed a new group called Shura
Ittihad-ul-Mujahideen (Mujahideen Unity Council), that they
claim will unite them against external forces trying to
divide the multiple Taliban groups based in Pakistan. They
have formed a 13-member shura to run the affairs of the new
alliance. The militants named Mullah Omar as their supreme
leader, but the group did not choose a leader of its
operational shura. According to a joint public statement,
the militant leaders praised Osama Bin Laden and Mullah Omar
as defenders of Islam and Muslims. The spokesman for
Baitullah Mehsud, Mufti Waliullah, said that the three
Taliban commanders would now operate from a single platform
under the new alliance. Currently Baitullah Mehsud controls
the eastern portion of South Waziristan, which is populated
largely by Mehsud tribesmen. Maulvi Nazir is based out of
the Ahmedzai Wazir area of South Waziristan on the agency's
western border with Afghanistan. Hafiz Gul Bahadur leads his
Utmanzai Wazir militants from Miram Shah, North Waziristan. 

3. (C) The formation of the new alliance follows Baitullah
Mehsud's December 2007 formation of TTP as an umbrella group
to better coordinate pro-Taliban activities. The creation of
the TTP was the merger of various Pakistani militant groups
operating under disparate commands in different tribal
agencies. The TTP alliance runs as a loose federation rather
than a strictly controlled organization. Each of the
militant leaders maintains a degree of autonomy and Baitullah
Mehsud, as the strongest leader of Pakistani Taliban, lends
his support and coordination to the various TTP subcommanders
in places such as Bajaur and Swat. Nazir, who broke openly
with Mehsud in the spring of 2007 (see para 6), was not a
part of TTP. Bahadur, who had jockeyed with Mehsud for the
title of pre-eminent local militant leader in the
Waziristans, had maintained some distance from the TTP label
before now. 

4. (C) The new Mujahideen Unity Council will likely be
another loose federation with each Taliban commander
maintaining his own authority. Federally Administered Tribal
Areas (FATA) Secretariat Additional Chief Secretary
Habibullah Khan expressed concern to Peshawar Principal
Officer in a February 24 meeting that this new body provides
all three militant leaders with unfettered access to all of
South and North Waziristan. Baitullah Mehsud will be a main
beneficiary of this new access, giving his fighters easier
entry to the Afghanistan border through Maulvi Nazir's
Wazir-held territory. Before the deal, Mehsud had limited
access to the border from his portion of South Waziristan
because he was blocked either by Maulvi Nazir or Gul Bahadur.
While the alliance will not work as a tight top-down
militant organization, it will facilitate access and
coordination of various Pakistani Taliban as they cross into
Afghanistan. 

5. (C) While Khan had no hard facts, he detected the hand of
the Haqqani network in bringing these rival commanders
together. The new coordination, he feared, will allow the
Taliban to focus on sending militants across the border into
Afghanistan. Sirajuddin Haqqani also claimed in the press
that he had convinced the three rival Taliban leaders to
meet. Sirajuddin and his father Jalaluddin Haqqani lead much
of the Taliban militancy in eastern Afghanistan. Sirajuddin
often travels to the tribal areas of Pakistan, North
Waziristan in particular, and has served as a mediator
between these rival Taliban leaders. 

6. (S/NF) In the past, the Pakistani government has supported
Maulvi Nazir in an attempt to counter Baitullah Mehsud in
South Waziristan. In the spring of 2007, an open break
between Nazir and Mehsud took place over the presence of
"Uzbek" fighters in South Waziristan. The disagreement
culminated in an operation in which Pakistani security forces
fought alongside Nazir's followers to oust Uzbeks from the
area. While Nazir appeared to draw on genuine local anger
and desire to remove "Uzbeks," his activities as an al-Qaida
facilitator and promoter of cross-border attacks have always
complicated Pakistani efforts to sell this episode as a
"success" story. A South Waziristan-based contact told
Principal Officer Peshawar on February 24 that Mehsud and
Nazir are showing signs of getting past old disagreements and
that "Uzbeks" are re-appearing in growing numbers in the
area. 

7. (SBU) According to Pakistani newspapers, Ahmedzai Wazir
elders of South Waziristan, who are concerned about the new
alliance and the possibility of "Uzbeks" coming back into
their territory, questioned Maulvi Nazir about the deal with
rival Mehsud. At a meeting in Wana, South Waziristan Maulvi
Nazir assured the elders that each militant group will
continue to have its own independent status and remain
sovereign in their own territory. Nazir explained that the
alliance was formed "only to act together against the United
States" because the Taliban was concerned about the troop
surge in Afghanistan, according to Pakistan press reports.
The elders publicly cautioned Nazir that they would turn
against him if this new deal brought any harm to their areas. 

8. (C) While he did not touch on a possible ISI role in
brokering this new alliance, Habibullah Khan noted that
pressure has been building on the Pakistani military in the
Waziristans. The Pakistani military and then Northwest
Frontier Province Governor Orakzai quietly entered peace
deals with North Waziristan commanders in December 2007 and
with Baitullah Mehsud in February 2008 in order to achieve
relative peace. Those agreements came after a series of high
profile attacks on the military in the Waziristans, including
the kidnapping of over 250 security forces by Baitullah
Mehsud and Jan 2008 fighting at Ladha Fort in South
Waziristan. While violence directed at the military in the
Waziristans has been minor in the last few months, Peshawar
observers regularly note that the military remains concerned
with its ability to keep a lid on trouble in these two
agencies. Chief of Army Staff General Kayani believes the
respite offered by this latest agreement is necessary for his
stretched forces to continue fighting in Bajaur and Mohmand
agencies. However, the relative quiet in South and North
Waziristan has allowed Baitullah Mehsud to increasingly send
his fighters in other parts of the FATA and Northwest
Frontier Province, including Swat. 

9. (C) Khan also noted with deep dismay that this
announcement demonstrates that these militant commanders see
themselves in a strong enough position to form an alliance
that takes them one step closer to a formal territorial
takeover of the Waziristan as an "Islamic Emirate." South
Waziristan contacts also commented that there is an
increasing presence of Punjabi militants from Jaish-e
Muhammad in the Mehsud areas of South Waziristan. (Comment:
A development if accurate that is almost certainly of concern
to the Pakistani military. It is significant that Baitullah
Mehsud's strength and open militancy are drawing fighters
from places such as southern Punjab.) 

10. (C) As this new alliance formed, Mullah Omar ordered
militants in North and South Waziristan to immediately stop
their attacks on Pakistani security forces, according to
press reports. Omar said in a letter to the militants, "If
anybody really wants to wage jihad, they must fight the U.S.
and NATO troops inside Afghanistan." The letter also stated
that Omar was responsible for the agreement between Mehsud,
Nazir, and Bahadur, and that after this agreement "the
attacks on Pakistani security forces by the local Taliban
will decrease if not end completely." Mullah Omar continues
to exert considerable influence on the militants in South and
North Waziristan. Halting attacks against Pakistani forces
may increase the militants' safe haven space in Pakistan,
allowing the militants to cross the border to attack NATO
forces in Afghanistan. 

11. (C) Comment: It is too early to predict how effective
this new alliance will be in launching cross-border attacks
on U.S./NATO forces, but its formation will provide the group
with unfettered access to Afghanistan across North and South
Waziristan. It is another indication that the GOP's tribal
divide and conquer strategy against militants is not working,
at least not to our advantage. Pakistan's security forces,
however, may see limited downsides to an arrangement that
focuses militant attacks outside of Pakistan.

SECRET: GERMANY’S NEW INTERIOR MINISTER FACES STEEP

VZCZCXYZ0005
RR RUEHWEB

DE RUEHRL #1393/01 3081215
ZNY SSSSS ZZH
R 041215Z NOV 09
FM AMEMBASSY BERLIN
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 5677
INFO RUCNMEM/EU MEMBER STATES COLLECTIVE
RUCNFRG/FRG COLLECTIVE
RUEATRS/DEPT OF TREASURY WASHINGTON DC
RHMCSUU/FBI WASHINGTON DC
RHEFHLC/HOMELAND SECURITY CENTER WASHINGTON DC
RUEKJCS/HQ USEUCOM LO WASHINGTON DC
RHMFISS/HQ USEUCOM VAIHINGEN GE
RHEHNSC/NSC WASHINGTON DC
RUCXONI/ONI WASHINGTON DC
RUKAAKA/USAREUR ACE DARMSTADT GE
RUEHRL/USDAO BERLIN GE
RUEAWJA/DEPT OF JUSTICE WASHINGTON DC
RUEAIIA/CIA WASHINGTON DC
S E C R E T BERLIN 001393 

NOFORN
SIPDIS 

STATE FOR EUR, S/CT, L
DHS FOR OIA SCARDAVILLE 

E.O. 12958: DECL: 11/04/2019
TAGS: PGOV PTER PREL KHLS KJUS GM
SUBJECT: GERMANY'S NEW INTERIOR MINISTER FACES STEEP
LEARNING CURVE 

REF: A. BERLIN 1377
     B. BERLIN 1167
     C. BERLIN 988
     D. 2008 BERLIN 1455
     E. 2008 BERLIN 504 

Classified By: Robert A. Pollard, Minister-Counselor for Economic Affai
rs for Reasons 1.4(b) and (d). 

1. (C) SUMMARY: Germany's new federal interior minister,
Thomas de Maiziere, is known for being a competent
administrator who performed effectively over the past four
years as the Chancellery Chief of Staff.  De Maiziere is a
close confidant of Chancellor Merkel, their professional
relationship dates back to 1990, and he developed a
reputation as a reliable crisis manager and interagency
master over the past four years.  Although de Maiziere
previously served as a state interior minister in Saxony, he
has less direct experience dealing with the international
security issues - most prominently counterterrorism - that he
will face as federal interior minister.  Furthermore, de
Maiziere is not known for being ideological or outspoken.  In
this respect, de Maiziere represents a marked change from his
predecessor, powerhouse Wolfgang Schaeuble, who had strong
views on security policy and was willing to endure
considerable criticism to achieve his policy goals.  We do
not expect de Maiziere to push for further expanding law
enforcement powers of police and/or security services.  De
Maiziere indicates that he intends to focus on integration of
foreigners into German society and will continue the
Ministry's Islam Conference, a controversial Schaeuble
initiative that had advanced the country's discussion on
immigration and discrimination issues.  He also intends to
promote the further integration of former east and west
Germany.  END SUMMARY 

An Aristocratic Westerner Makes His Name in the East
--------------------------------------------- ------- 

2. (U) De Maiziere, 55, is a lawyer by training who was born
and raised in Bonn, but has spent nearly the last two decades
in the eastern states of Mecklenburg-Vorpommern and Saxony.
He is a descendent of the noble Maiziere-les-Metz family who,
as Huguenots, fled France for asylum in Prussia in the late
seventeenth century.  De Maiziere's father, Ulrich, was
Inspector General of the German Armed Forces.  His cousin,
Lothar, was the last, and only democratically elected,
Premier of the German Democratic Republic, who later served
as a minister in the Kohl government.  As a staffer in the
offices of Berlin Governing Mayor Richard von Weizsacker, and
later Eberhard Diepgen, de Maiziere participated in the
negotiations on German reunification.  After 1990, de
Maiziere worked to re-establish democratic structures in
eastern states starting first in Mecklenburg-Vorpommern.
From 1998 through 2005, de Maiziere served in Saxony as head
of the State Chancery, and as Finance, Justice and Interior
Minister.  De Maiziere joined the Christian Democratic Union
(CDU) as a student in 1972.  De Maiziere won a direct mandate
in the September 27 national parliamentary election and is
now a member of the Bundestag representing the district of
Meissen in Saxony. 

3. (C) De Maiziere first met Angela Merkel in 1990 and his
recommendation of her to his cousin Lothar de Maiziere is
said to have facilitated her entry into CDU politics.
Chancellor Merkel and de Maiziere are known to have a very
close professional relationship and to share a similar sober
and analytical approach to governing.  De Maiziere is
reported to have performed well throughout his tenure as
Merkel's Chancellery Chief and Minister for Special Duties.
As Chancellery Chief of Staff, de Maiziere was known as a
consensus builder who understands and effectively works the 

interagency process, sometimes requiring competing ministers
to resolve disputes among themselves.  The Chancellor no
doubt appreciated de Maiziere's efforts to shield her from
these policy battles given her general propensity to stay
above the fray and to express an opinion on an issue only
when consensus has been reached at the cabinet level. 

De Maiziere Faces a Steep Learning Curve
---------------------------------------- 

4. (C) De Maiziere's experience in eastern Germany helped him
gain new responsibilities for the Federal Interior Ministry:
the entire Department of Eastern German affairs has been
moved from the Transportation and Urban Affairs Ministry to
the Interior Ministry.  In his remarks to ministry employees
on his first day in office, de Maiziere said that with this
move the interior ministry is now responsible for not only
immigrant integration, but also the integration of Eastern
and Western Germany and the cohesion of German society.  De
Maiziere will continue the German Islam Conference, an
initiative started by his predecessor, which seeks to improve
the integration of Germany's Muslim population and open a
dialogue between the government and Germany's Muslim
community.  The Islam Conference has met with some
controversy and came under scrutiny earlier this year when it
was discovered that some Muslim representatives were alleged
to have links with extremist groups. 

5. (S/NF) De Maiziere has some familiarity with security
issues given that his duties in the Chancellery included
overall coordination of Germany's intelligence services.  De
Maiziere was helpful in promoting cooperation between German
ministries and security services with USG counterparts both
during the 2007 Sauerland Islamic Jihad Union terrorist cell
case and following extremist threats surrounding the recent
national elections.  De Maiziere's predecessor Wolfgang
Schaeuble spent considerable time dealing with the issue of
terrorism and working to update Germany's legal frameworks
and expand the mandates of law enforcement agencies to ensure
they had the capabilities to address the phenomena.  In
contrast, de Maiziere said virtually nothing in public on the
issue of terrorism during his time in the Chancellery, and he
has not emphasized the topic since moving to Interior.
Therefore, there is some question concerning the depth of his
knowledge of the transnational character of terrorism,
radicalization pathways, and terrorists' increasing use of
the Internet and related technology to recruit, train and
organize, aspects of the issue that most affect Germany today. 

6. (C) During his first day remarks to employees, de Maiziere
made the peculiar statement that "the Interior Ministry is
responsible for internal matters, and the Foreign Ministry is
responsible for issues external to Germany."  This
characterization of the MoI's tasks contrasts sharply with EU
law enforcement integration initiatives under Schaeuble such
as the Pruem data sharing agreement.  Observers are concerned
that de Maiziere's limited perspective could result in
diminished bilateral cooperation and mark a significant
departure from former minister Schaeuble, who placed a heavy
emphasis throughout his tenure on increasing security
cooperation with European and other international partners.
De Maiziere would benefit from learning about the benefits of
international cooperation first hand from his counterparts at
the G6 meeting in London this week, which DHS Secretary
Napolitano and senior DoJ representatives will attend.
(Note: The G6 is an informal grouping of the interior
ministers of Germany, Italy, Spain, France, Poland and the
UK.  Schaeuble made a point of inviting the USG to G6
meetings that he hosted, a custom that UK Minister Jacqui
Smith is following for this week's London meeting.  Ref D.) 

Will de Maiziere be a Strong Security Partner?
--------------------------------------------- - 

7. (C) We do not expect de Maiziere to be aggressive in
pushing for expanded security powers.  However, there is less
need for this as two recent legislative packages have already
strengthened Germany's counterterrorism legal framework (Refs
C and E).  More relevant is whether de Maiziere will build on
Schaeuble's record of deepening U.S.-German security
cooperation, such as the successful negotiations of a
bilateral "Pruem-like" agreement to exchange information on
terrorism and serious crime suspects, as well as establish an
automated fingerprint checking system.  Final implementation
of our agreement is awaiting resolution of some concerns
raised by a Green Party Justice Senator from Hamburg.  We
will likely need support from de Maiziere to break this
impasse, but it is unclear whether de Maiziere is willing to
make the effort on an initiative that his predecessor
initiated and for which he received heavy criticism due to
data privacy concerns.  On the issue of resettlement of
Guantanamo detainees, de Maiziere has yet to express a
viewpoint one way or the other. 

8. (C) We anticipate that data protection and domestic
security issues will be a continuing theme that the new
coalition government of the Christian Democrats (CDU and CSU)
and Free Democrats (FDP) will struggle with.  During the
previous administration, the FDP regularly criticized former
interior minister Schaeuble for policies which the FDP
believed trampled on citizens' privacy rights (Ref B).
Germany's new Justice Minister Leutheusser-Schnarrenberger
(FDP) believes that Schaeuble went too far in giving police
new powers of investigation, and she was successful in
committing the new government to modify a number of these
powers and introducing added data protection measures in the
recently completed coalition agreement (Ref A).  The FDP has
found it politically expedient to cast personal freedoms and
security policy as mutually exclusive.  In this debate, de
Maiziere's greatest advantage is that he is not Schaeuble.
As Interior Minister, de Maiziere is expected to support
existing laws and practices initiated by his predecessor, and
his reputation for reasonableness and consensus-building
should serve him well in these discussions.
MURPHY

TAGESSPIEGEL: Die STASI kannte viele Polizei-Geheimnisse

Karl-Heinz Kurras – Foto: dpa

Einen Einfluss auf die West-Berliner Polizei hatte das MfS nicht, das haben Forscher der FU aufgedeckt. Nach dem Fall des Stasi-Agenten und Polizisten Kurras hatte Polizeipräsident Glietsch eine Untersuchung in Auftrag gegeben.

Er war einer von wenigen, dafür aber der Wichtigste. Der West-Berliner Polizist Karl-Heinz Kurras hatte als Zuträger des Ost-Berliner Ministeriums für Staatssicherheit nicht seinesgleichen. Das ist eins der Ergebnisse der Studie „Das Ministerium für Staatssicherheit der DDR und die West-Berliner Polizei“. Der zur Freien Universität gehörende Forschungsverbund SED-Staat hat sie im Auftrag des Polizeipräsidenten Dieter Glietsch erstellt.

Ein weiteres Ergebnis: Kein Stasi-Mann hat es bis in die höheren Ränge der West-Berliner Polizei geschafft. Das MfS kannte viele Einzelheiten, hatte aber keine manipulative Kraft. Vor allem dieses Ergebnis nahm Glietsch mit einer Zufriedenheit hin: Die Studie habe „Sicherheit schaffen“ sollen, dass es keinen nennenswerten Einfluss der Stasi auf die Führung der Polizei im Westen gegeben hat.

Das Ergebnis habe ihn „nicht überrascht“, so der Polizeipräsident – schließlich würden Polizisten in ihrer Karriere bei vielen Gelegenheiten überprüft.

Um so eifriger versorgten Polizeibeamte der unteren Dienstgrade die Stasi – auch wenn es nie besonders viele waren. Durchschnittlich zehn bis zwanzig Polizisten standen in den untersuchten Jahren 1950 bis 1972 im Dienst und im Sold des MfS, so die Studie. Laut Jochen Staadt vom Forschungsverbund war die Stasi an allem interessiert, was sie bekommen konnte: Fotos von Polizeiwachen, Namenslisten von Polizisten, biografische Einzelheiten, etwa zu finanziellen Verhältnissen, Ausstattung der Polizei, Waffendepots. Man habe so viel wie möglich für den Fall eines militärischen Angriffs auf West-Berlin wissen wollen – das sei die Strategie hinter der Informationsbeschaffung gewesen, so Staadt. Wäre es zu einem solchen Angriff gekommen, so der Historiker, hätte Kurras wohl mit seinem Führungsoffizier direkt zusammengearbeitet: Major Werner Eiserbeck, Kurras’ Mann beim MfS, sollte Dienststellenleiter in Schöneberg werden, wenn es die Stasi bis in den Westen geschafft hätte.

180 Aktenbände gehören zu dem ausgewerteten „Objektvorgang West-Berliner Polizei“. Dass es den Vorgang bei der Stasi-Unterlagenbehörde gab, wussten bis 2009 sogar in dieser Behörde nicht viele. Eine Historikerin stieß auf Berichte eines „Otto Bohl“ – und der erwies sich bei der Durchsicht der Akten als der Polizist Karl-Heinz Kurras, bis dahin bekannt als der Mann, der am 2. Juni 1967 bei einer Demonstration den Studenten Benno Ohnesorg erschoss.

In der Debatte über Kurras und das MfS kam die Frage auf, ob die Stasi den Auftrag für die tödlichen Schüsse auf den Studenten Benno Ohnesorg gegeben hatte – nichts spricht dafür. Außerdem kam die Praxis der Stasi-Überprüfung früherer Volkspolizisten zur Sprache.

Polizeipräsident Glietsch erinnerte am Mittwoch daran: 9000 ehemalige Volkspolizisten waren 1990 in die Berliner Polizei übernommen worden. 7600 wurden damals auf eine Stasi-Belastung untersucht, mehr als 1100 deshalb entlassen. In einer weiteren Überprüfung wurden fast 3000 höhere West-Berliner Polizisten auf eine Zusammenarbeit mit der Stasi überprüft – das schien es nicht gegeben zu haben. Kurras konnte damals nicht mehr auffallen – er war bereits entlassen.

Noch immer sind nicht alle Stasi-Zuträger namentlich bekannt. Die jetzt veröffentlichte Studie enthält keine Klarnamen – die werden nur intern genannt. Glietsch zufolge soll nun die Staatsanwaltschaft prüfen, ob ehemalige West-Berliner Polizisten noch wegen Geheimnisverrat zu belangen sind.
In einer weiteren Studie solle der Forschungsverbund nun die Zeit von 1972 bis 1989 untersuchen, sagte Glietsch. Klaus Schroeder, Leiter des Forschungsverbunds, machte dem Polizeipräsidenten ein Kompliment : Die Polizei sei die erste staatliche Institution, die sich derart erforschen lasse. Und das Ergebnis der nächsten Studie sei „offen“.

http://www.tagesspiegel.de/berlin/die-stasi-kannte-viele-kleine-polizei-geheimnisse/3981752.html

TOP-SECRET: IRAN: AHMADINEJAD’S STAR FADING IN THE ARAB WORLD?

VZCZCXRO3166
RR RUEHBC RUEHDE RUEHKUK RUEHTRO
DE RUEHDIR #0316/01 2151125
ZNY SSSSS ZZH
R 031125Z AUG 09
FM RPO DUBAI
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 0474
INFO RHEHAAA/NSC WASHINGTON DC
RUEAIIA/CIA WASHDC
RUEIDN/DNI WASHINGTON DC
RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHINGTON DC
RUMICEA/USCENTCOM INTEL CEN MACDILL AFB FL
RUCNIRA/IRAN COLLECTIVE
RUEHDIR/RPO DUBAI 0475
S E C R E T SECTION 01 OF 03 RPO DUBAI 000316 

NOFORN
SIPDIS 

E.O. 12958: DECL:  8/3/2019
TAGS: PREL PROP PGOV PINR IR
SUBJECT: IRAN: AHMADINEJAD'S STAR FADING IN THE ARAB WORLD? 

DUBAI 00000316  001.2 OF 003 

CLASSIFIED BY: Timothy Richardson, Acting Director, Iran
Regional Presence Office, Department of State.
REASON: 1.4 (b), (d)
1. (U) This is a joint cable by the Iran Regional Presence
Office and the Dubai Regional Media Hub. 

2. (S/NF) Summary: Since Iran's June 12 presidential elections,
Arab media have intensely focused their coverage on the
demonstrations in Iran and the international community's
response to the government crackdown.  Whereas in recent years
the Arab media have limited their commentary to Iran's external
relations -- particularly its regional ambitions and the
international implications of its nuclear program -- during the
post-election crisis Arab commentators have, for the first time,
poked a hole in the veneer of the Islamic Republic's internal
political system and explored its underpinnings more closely,
often challenging the system's very legitimacy in on-air
commentary.  A number of these commentators have opined that
Ahmadinejad has, at least in the near term, lost standing among
some moderate Arabs, who have come to view Ahmadinejad's
administration as oppressive, unpopular, and undemocratic, much
as they criticize many Arab governments.  However, all of the
Arab media figures we spoke to emphasized that Arab criticism of
Ahmadinejad has not necessarily led to increased support for
U.S. policy in the region.  On the contrary, closer analysis
suggests that Ahmadinejad's eroding popularity in the Arab world
has created a scenario in which any U.S. effort to engage the
current Iranian government will be perceived by a wide spectrum
of Arabs as accommodation with Ahmadinejad. 

ALL EYES ON IRAN 

---------------- 

3. (S/NF) Iran's post-election crisis has dominated the Arab
media's news coverage for the past seven weeks.  The
demonstrations have garnered special coverage on Al-Arabiya and
have consistently been among the top headlines on Al-Jazeera.
The marketing director of the Middle East Broadcasting Company
(MBC), parent company of Al-Arabiya, told IRPO/DRMH that
Al-Arabiya's viewership has skyrocketed since the June 12
election.  Al-Arabiya's news website has also experienced a
dramatic increase in visits from users living in the region
between Tripoli and Amman, which the marketing director, a
native of Lebanon, attributed to the tremendous interest Sunni
Arabs have in watching the drama in Iran unfold.  Coverage of
Iran's election aftermath is not limited to straightforward news
reporting; editorial pages, media commentaries, and the Arab
blogosphere have also been abuzz with debate over the
demonstrations, the international community's response, and the
implications of these events for the Arab world.  While Iran's
elections may no longer command daily headlines in the Western
media, nearly all the Arab media commentators with whom we spoke
recognized that the Arab street remains firmly focused on the
recent unrest and continuing political drama playing out in Iran. 

THE BENEVOLENT DICTATOR'S FALL FROM GRACE? 

------------------------------------------ 

4. (S/NF) A Syrian journalist and blogger, who owns a media
consultancy firm in Dubai, believes that many in the Arab street
initially viewed Ahmadinejad when he came to power in 2005 as a
"benevolent dictator."  Citing the tradition of the Mahdi, the
media consultant argued that both Shi'a and Sunni Arabs are
taught from early childhood to await the arrival of a strong and
unimpeachable figure who will lead the Muslim world.  The media
consultant maintained that even secular Arabs view the world,
albeit unintentionally, with this ingrained mindset.  Our
contact argued that Ahmadinejad played in to this narrative, and
when Ahmadinejad arrived on the international stage many Arabs
saw him, in contrast to their own flawed leaders, as a humble
and pious man who was brave enough to stand up for his people
and the greater Muslim world by confronting Israel and the West
head on.  However,  both the intensely competitive campaign
period and the forceful reaction by the Iranian people to the
official election results have led some moderate Arabs to
rethink Ahmadinejad's  true disposition. The election, the media
consultant said, led some Arabs to understand that despite his
astutely crafted and well-marketed image in the Arab world, 

DUBAI 00000316  002.2 OF 003 

Ahmadinejad is resented by many Iranians for domestic
mismanagement, incompetence, and corruption.  Because of this
public fall from grace, so the media consultant told us,
Ahmadinejad is no longer the "untouchable, holy figure" in the
Arab world he once was -- his flaws have brought him down to the
level of the Arab world's own imperfect leaders. An Al-Arabiya
executive, speaking at a recent conference, said that the
election aftermath had destroyed the image many Arabs had of the
Islamic Revolution, and Ahmadinejad's legitimacy as a leader was
now open to question. [NOTE: The media consultant attributed
Iran's perceived "victories" over the U.S. and the West to
Ahmadinejad, as opposed to Supreme Leader Khamenei.  While
conventional wisdom in the West is that Khamenei has the final
say over Iran's most vital interests, including the nuclear
program, the consultant's comments suggest that the Arab street
views Ahmadinejad as much more influential in the Islamic
Republic's decision-making system.] 

POST-ELECTION CRISIS NOT A SILVER BULLET FOR ARAB REGIMES 

--------------------------------------------- ------------ 

5. (S/NF) Ahmadinejad's fall from grace notwithstanding, most of
the Arab media commentators with whom we spoke agreed that Arab
governments have a limited ability to capitalize on
Ahmadinejad's missteps because of the skeletons in their own
closets.   Al-Arabiya's former Tehran bureau chief observed that
Arab regional powers like Saudi Arabia and Egypt, who no doubt
would like to exploit Ahmadinejad's current vulnerabilities,
have remained noticeably silent.  In his view, they realize that
any statement condemning Tehran's crackdown on peaceful
dissidents would appear untenably hypocritical in the eyes of
their own citizens.  He considers this public silence yet
another "missed opportunity" for Arab leaders to take a stand to
counter Ahmadinejad's rhetoric and further detract from his
popularity with the Arab street. 

NEW SPACE TO DISAGREE WITH AHMADINEJAD AND THE U.S. 

--------------------------------------------- ------ 

6. (S/NF)  All of the Arab commentators and news media figures
we spoke to agreed that the U.S. "played it right" throughout
the post-election crisis by staying away from detailed public
comments that could be perceived as interventionist.  However,
the Arab commentators were quick to distinguish between
criticism of Ahmadinejad in the Arab street and support for U.S.
policies.  The Syrian media consultant said that the heated
debates before the election, in which the three challengers --
Mousavi, Karroubi, and Reza'i -- publicly criticized Ahmadinejad
for corruption and economic mismanagement, made it clear to
Arabs that this election was about Iran, not the U.S.  This
distinction, coupled with the U.S.' restraint in commenting on
the election, provided an unprecedented window for Arab
commentators to criticize Ahmadinejad without appearing to side
with the U.S. 

7. (S/NF) Examples of this played out during two separate
appearances by the Dubai Regional Media Hub Acting Director on
live panel discussions on Abu Dhabi TV and Lebanese New TV
regarding regional issues, including events in Iran.  Whereas
fellow Arab panelist resolutely disagreed with her comments in
support of U.S. policy in the region, in particular the peace
process, they felt free to openly criticize Ahmadinejad's
government, which they refrained from doing in the past, for its
internal crackdown and regional ambitions.  One Saudi
commentator contrasted Turkish regional mediation, which he
described as a positive force in the region, with Iranian
regional intervention, which he called pernicious and
destabilizing.  A Lebanese commentator noted the irony of Iran
accusing outsiders of interfering in its internal affairs when
there is not "one corner of the Arab world" where Iran does not
intervene behind the scenes. 

AHMADINEJAD DOWN BUT NOT OUT 

DUBAI 00000316  003.2 OF 003 

---------------------------- 

8. (S/NF) As Al-Arabiya's Tehran bureau chief noted, while
Ahmadinejad's image may have taken a hit in the Arab street as a
result of the government's handling of domestic dissent, the
damage is not necessarily permanent.  In his view, the Arab
street is notoriously emotional and "could easily be turned to
support Ahmadinejad once again" with some trumped up slogans and
public bravado.  The bureau chief believed that, in the
perceived leadership void left by Arab leaders on regional
issues, Ahmadinejad could rally public opinion by capitalizing
on any number of sensitive issues for the Arab street, most
prominent among them Israel, at upcoming international fora.
The Syrian media consultant, too, cautioned the U.S. not to
overestimate any erosion in Ahmadinejad's popularity with Arabs.
 In his opinion, Ahmadinejad has only lost standing with a
segment of moderates in the Arab street; he believes that most
Arabs are so polarized, either for or against Ahmadinejad, that
the allegations of voter fraud and the violent post-election
crackdown on protesters will not permanently sway their
positions one way or the other. 

ENGAGEMENT WITH IRAN: NO PLEASING THE ARAB STREET 

--------------------------------------------- ---- 

9. (S/NF) Comment:  Once the dust settles on Iran's
post-election crisis, Arabs will look to see if the U.S. deals
with Ahmadinejad as it pursues its nuclear nonproliferation
agenda despite the lingering questions over the legitimacy of
his election.  If the U.S. enters negotiations with
Ahmadinejad's government, moderate Arab observers may argue that
the U.S., for the sake of its own national interest, has cut a
deal at the expense of pro-democracy advocates -- just as many
in the Arab street believe the U.S. has done with a number of
Arab regimes.  Those Arabs who continue to support Ahmadinejad,
on the other hand, may perceive negotiations as a personal
victory for a humble leader who brought the U.S. to its knees
through steadfast resistance.  Thus, Ahmadinejad's "fall from
grace" in the Arab world may have created yet another obstacle
to improved Arab perceptions of the U.S. -- in which engagement
with an Ahmadinejad-led government is now a potentially
lose-lose scenario in which Arabs at both ends of the pro- and
anti-Ahmadinejad spectrum will consider negotiations with
Teheran an accommodation with the Iranian president.
RICHARDSON

CONFIDENTIAL: BRAZIL: MORE OBSERVATIONS ON FOREIGN POLICY

VZCZCXRO6643
OO RUEHRG
DE RUEHBR #2293/01 3051751
ZNY SSSSS ZZH
O 011751Z NOV 06
FM AMEMBASSY BRASILIA
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 7162
INFO RUEHAC/AMEMBASSY ASUNCION PRIORITY 5761
RUEHBO/AMEMBASSY BOGOTA PRIORITY 3987
RUEHBU/AMEMBASSY BUENOS AIRES PRIORITY 4384
RUEHCV/AMEMBASSY CARACAS PRIORITY 3488
RUEHGT/AMEMBASSY GUATEMALA PRIORITY 0311
RUEHLP/AMEMBASSY LA PAZ PRIORITY 4961
RUEHPE/AMEMBASSY LIMA PRIORITY 3228
RUEHMN/AMEMBASSY MONTEVIDEO PRIORITY 6570
RUEHOT/AMEMBASSY OTTAWA PRIORITY 1003
RUEHPU/AMEMBASSY PORT AU PRINCE PRIORITY 0158
RUEHQT/AMEMBASSY QUITO PRIORITY 2020
RUEHSG/AMEMBASSY SANTIAGO PRIORITY 5900
RUEHRG/AMCONSUL RECIFE PRIORITY 5757
RUEHRI/AMCONSUL RIO DE JANEIRO PRIORITY 3227
RUEHSO/AMCONSUL SAO PAULO PRIORITY 8490
RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHDC PRIORITY
RHEHNSC/NSC WASHDC PRIORITY
RUMIAAA/USCINCSO MIAMI FL PRIORITY
RUEATRS/DEPT OF TREASURY WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY
RUEAIIA/CIA WASHDC PRIORITY
S E C R E T SECTION 01 OF 02 BRASILIA 002293 

SIPDIS 

NOFORN
SIPDIS 

E.O. 12958: DECL: 05/25/2016
TAGS: PREL BR
SUBJECT: BRAZIL: MORE OBSERVATIONS ON FOREIGN POLICY IN
LULA'S SECOND TERM 

REF: BRASILIA 2245 

Classified By: POLITICAL COUNSELOR DENNIS HEARNE. REASONS: 1.4 (B)(D). 

1. (C) Introduction.  Reftel discussed Mission,s views that,
despite interesting media reports that President Lula da
Silva,s foreign policy in a second term could shift toward
closer ties with the U.S., we could not see yet concrete
evidence of such a trend.  We remain circumspect on this
question.  At the same time, candid and encouraging
conversations with top GOB officials on the day after Lula,s
strong victory at the polls left Ambassador and emboffs
wondering about the possibility that some change may be
brewing.  We report what we heard below, with the caveat that
we remain in a cautious "wait and see mode" for the time
being.  End introduction. 

2. (C) Ambassador and PolCouns visited the Planalto Palace on
30 October, and found a Presidency in an open mood of
jubilant celebration.  A steady column of VIPs streamed
through for audiences with re-elected President Lula.  A
relieved and buoyant Gilberto Carvalho, Chief of Lula,s
Personal Staff, received Ambassador and poloff for a courtesy
call, which turned into a compelling conversation about the
direction of policy in Lula,s second term.  Carvalho, who is
perhaps Lula,s closest long-time advisor, made the following
comments: 

--On foreign policy, Carvalho said that Lula,s first term
had seen a broad opening of Brazil to new alliances and
diplomatic arrangements worldwide.  Now, with this base
established, the second Lula government will re-focus
priority on "quality relationships with traditional
partners."  Specifically, for Brazil to grow with new
investment, the GOB will need to engage more intensively with
the United States, Carvalho stressed. 

--Ambassador welcomed this observation, but said he remained
concerned when he heard certain Brazilian officials speak of
the need to "counterbalance" against the U.S., and opined
that two democracies should be able to debate and work
together directly, without such contrivances.  Carvalho was
emphatic in agreeing, said there will be no further
discussion of counterbalances, and asked for the
Ambassador,s understanding if rhetoric during the election
campaign had occasionally seemed critical of the U.S.  He
again assured Ambassador that the second Lula government
wants investment and growth, and sees relations with the U.S.
as central to this. 

--At the conclusion of the meeting, Carvalho provided his
private telephone numbers to Ambassador and PolCouns and
encouraged them to contact him directly at any time if there
was problematic development in relations between the two
governments, of if they wished to present an issue directly
to President Lula.  Carvalho said he would welcome this
direct channel with the Ambassador. 

3. (S/NF) In a separate meeting at Planalto with General
Jorge Armando Felix, Lula,s Minister for Institutional
Security, Ambassador, PolCouns and Regional Affairs Chief
raised the subject of intensified U.S.-Brazil exchanges and
cooperation in intelligence and security.  Ambassador noted
that President Lula, in a brief aside at the UNGA in New
York, had encouraged continued engagement with General Felix,
presumably on such issues.  General Felix then announced that
he had, subsequent to an earlier meeting with Ambassador,
commissioned a formal paper outlining specific areas for
consultation and collaboration at the policy level with the
USG in the intelligence field.   Ambassador and Felix agreed 

BRASILIA 00002293  002 OF 002 

that the GOB could also specify in the paper specific
equipment or training they might require, and decided to plan
together for a high-level bilateral intelligence meeting
early in 2007 in Brasilia. 

4. (C) In an earlier conversation on the same day,
Development and Industry Minister Luiz Furlan told Ambassador
that Lula was pressing him to stay on in a second government,
and Furlan appeared to be considering this option.  Furlan, a
moderate with a business background who has long pressed
within Lula,s cabinet for closer cooperation with the United
States, seemed to be of the view that Lula,s second term
priorities would be shifting in the direction of closer
engagement with the U.S. and other developed nations. 

5. (C) Comment.  Our senior interlocutors were in high
spirits yesterday, with a kind word for the world, including
the U.S.   But without major changes in the foreign
ministry's senior staffing and orientation, we wonder about
the viability of a tilt toward the U.S. and developing world,
and away from the south-south priorities of the first Lula
term.  Nonetheless, it is intriguing that we have received
such a steady stream of strong signals from senior Lula
advisors on the day after his victory.  Watch this space. 

Sobel

CONFIDENTIAL: LEBANON: BELLEMARE ANXIOUS FOR MORE USG ASSISTANCE

VZCZCXRO3042
PP RUEHAG RUEHBC RUEHDE RUEHKUK RUEHROV
DE RUEHLB #1348/01 2591418
ZNY SSSSS ZZH
P 151418Z SEP 08
FM AMEMBASSY BEIRUT
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 3034
INFO RUEHEE/ARAB LEAGUE COLLECTIVE PRIORITY
RUCNMEM/EU MEMBER STATES COLLECTIVE PRIORITY
RHMFISS/CDR USCENTCOM MACDILL AFB FL PRIORITY
RUEAIIA/CIA WASHDC PRIORITY
RHMFISS/CDR USEUCOM VAIHINGEN GE PRIORITY
RUEAWJA/DEPT OF JUSTICE WASHDC PRIORITY
RHEHAAA/NSC WASHDC PRIORITY
RUCNDT/USMISSION USUN NEW YORK PRIORITY 2905
S E C R E T SECTION 01 OF 03 BEIRUT 001348 

NOFORN
SIPDIS 

DEPT FOR NEA/FO, NEA/ELA, IO/FO-HOOK, WARLICK,
IO/UNP-AMORRISON, L/FO-JBELLINGER, JTHESSIN,
L/AN-LJACOBSON, L/UNA-TBUCHWALD, INR/GGI-MARGULIES,
CIA/CNC-JFINKEL, JBRODERERICK, CIA/CTC-JBEAN, DOJ-JEVY,
USUN-KHALILZAD, WOLFF, SCHEDLBAUER, NSC FOR
ABRAMS/RAMCHAND/YERGER/MCDERMOTT 

E.O. 12958: DECL: 09/12/2018
TAGS: PREL PTER PGOV PINR UNSC LE SY
SUBJECT: LEBANON: BELLEMARE ANXIOUS FOR MORE USG ASSISTANCE
THAN HE HAS SEEN 

REF: THE HAGUE 744 

Classified By: Ambassador Michele J. Sison for reasons 1.4 (b), (d) 

SUMMARY
------- 

1. (S/NF)  In a September 12 meeting with the Ambassador,
Daniel Bellemare, Commissioner of the UN Independent
International Investigative Commission (UNIIIC) made three
specific requests for USG assistance and additional requests
for USG action.  First, he asked that the USG provide
intelligence information that UNIIIC has formally requested.
Second, that the USG loan UNIIIC two criminal investigators
TDY.  UNIIIC needs "investigators who can question a witness"
to interview some 200 persons currently in prison who may
have some relevant information.  Third, that the USG urge the
UK to do more to help UNIIIC, particularly with intelligence
information (the UK has provided loaned personnel). 

2. (S/NF)  In addition, Bellemare asked for USG support when
the Management Committee considers the Tribunal operating
budget on September 25 -- the same day that Lebanese
President Sleiman will meet President Bush in Washington.  He
also raised the prospect of consultations among the P-5 on a
new resolution to clarify some legal issues.  Finally he
repeated earlier requests for a USG reaction to 26 sketches
of possible suspects that UNIIIC had given the USG and asked
about getting access to alleged Hizballah defectors
reportedly in the U.S. 

3. (S/NF)  On other matters, Bellemare said that the GOL has
not asked that UNIIIC investigate the latest political
assassination (the September 10 attack on opposition Druze
member Saleh Aridi).  He is concerned about a new
Telecommunication Ministry directive that may impede his
plans for using wiretaps.  End Summary. 

GOL HAS NOT ASKED THAT UNIIIC
INVESTIGATE LATEST ASSASSINATION
-------------------------------- 

4. (S/NF)  The Ambassador and DCM met on September 12 with
Daniel Bellemare, Commissioner of the UN Independent
International Investigative Commission (UNIIIC), in his
office in Monteverde.  The Ambassador asked if UNIIIC would
investigate the case of Saleh Aridi, a Druze political
official assassinated in a car bomb attack near Beirut on
September 10.  Bellemare explained that for UNIIIC to take on
a case, first the GOL must ask the UN SYG, then the SYG and
Security Council must approve.  He said that the GOL had
shown no indication that it would request that UNIIIC
investigate the Aridi killing.  UNIIIC is interested in
finding out more about the Aridi attack, since details are
similar to other cases it is investigating.  If it is not
invited to investigate but wants information about a case,
UNIIIC must submit a request to the Lebanese chief
prosecutor.  The criteria the GOL uses to decide on
requesting UNIIIC assistance is "a mystery to me" Bellemare
said.  (NOTE:  The Aridi assassination is the first of a
pro-Syrian politician.  END NOTE.) 

WIRETAPPING
----------- 

5. (S/NF)  Bellemare was concerned about something he had
learned the day before that might affect wiretapping.  The
Telecommunications Ministry had directed two private telecom
companies in Lebanon to inform the Ministry about any
requests for wiretapping.  He noted that it is well known
that the Internal Security Forces (ISF), the national police,
conduct wiretapping even though the legal basis for their
authority to do so is weak.  The Telecom Ministry's move may
have been directed against the ISF.  The order, however, also
could limit the ability of UNIIIC to conduct wiretaps if the
phone companies fear that they will have to report those
efforts to the Telecommunications Ministry. 

6. (S/NF)  The Ambassador asked if Bellemare believed the
action was targeted at UNIIIC, noting that the new
Telecommunications Minister is from the opposition.
Bellemare replied that he was not in a position to say.  At
his meeting with PM Fouad Siniora earlier in the week, on
September 8, Siniora told Bellemare to inform him if he runs
into any problems with cooperation from government officials.
 He said he might discuss this with the PM if it looks as if
this new telecom directive will be a problem, but first he
will meet with officials of the two telecom companies next
week.  The Ambassador offered to support his efforts at
resolving this issue. 

7. (S/NF)  Bellemare noted that at his August 14 meeting in
The Hague with the USG Interagency Working Group (IWG), he
had asked for USG help with wiretapping capability.  He said
that trying to work wiretapping through the Lebanese ISF or
military intelligence would be like "putting the names (of
targets) in the paper".  He explained that UN legal experts
were currently looking into the possibility that UNIIIC has
legal authority to carry out wiretaps.  Beyond legal
authority for wiretapping, though, Bellemare said he needs
technical capability. 

ASSISTANCE FROM THE USG
----------------------- 

8. (S/NF)  Bellemare expressed frustration that USG has not
provided more in response to his requests for assistance, and
noted that he has discussed this with State Department
officials.  He outlined three requests for USG assistance for
his investigation. 

-- One, provide intelligence information that UNIIIC has
formally requested, or inform him that it cannot be provided,
so that he knows not to pursue the requests. 

-- Two, provide two loaned criminal analysts on TDY.  UNIIIC
needs "investigators who can question a witness" to interview
some 200 persons currently in prison who may have some
relevant informtion. 

-- Three, using USG influence, urge the U government to
provide more to UNIIIC, particulaly regarding intelligence
information.  Bellemare said he has requests in to MI-6, but
has not received much.  On personnel, Scotland Yard has
provided a loaned investigator. 

9. (S/NF)  Bellemare showed a good understanding of the
problems associated with complying with the first two
requests from his several meetings with USG officials, but
his frustration was nonetheless evident.  "You are the key
player.  If the U.S. doesn't help me, who will?"  The USG has
"a big investment in the Tribunal" and being more forthcoming
on UNIIIC's requests is a way of making that investment pay
off, he said. 

10. (S/NF)  During the meeting, Bellemare made several other
requests for USG action: 

-- USG support when the Committee considers the Tribunal
operating budget, scheduled for September 25, the same day
that Lebanese President Sleiman will meet President Bush in
Washington.  He warned that the budget includes high travel
costs, but that these are necessary because of the need for
frequent travel between the Hague and Lebanon. Bellemare
thanked the USG for what he said was a much improved attitude
on the part of the Tribunal Management Committee.  His
requests have been more favorably received than was the case
previously. 

-- He raised the prospect of consultations among the P-5 on a
new resolution to clarify some legal issues.  He mused about
the possibility of getting Chapter VII authority for the
Tribunal via such a new resolution, but seemed to think that
was not doable in the Council. 

-- He asked for a reaction to the 26 sketches of possible
suspects that UNIIIC had given the USG. 

-- Finally, he asked about getting access to alleged
Hizballah defectors reportedly in the U.S., or a definitive
negative response to the request.  The answers the USG has
given him so far on this subject, he said, have been not
sufficiently definitive. 

INTERVIEWS IN SYRIA
------------------- 

11. (S/NF)  On this issue, Bellemare repeated what he said in
the IWG meeting (reftel): that he did not want to go to Syria
until the USG or other sources had provided names of leads he
should ask to interview and other information.  If Syria
denied his request to interview these people, then he would
have evidence of Syrian non-cooperation.  Just asking would
give some indication to others in Syria where his
investigation might be headed, which could provoke more
cooperation "if I hit the right person." 

12. (S/NF)  Bellemare emphasized the urgency for responding
to his request related to Syria, first, because UNIIIC's
mandate and with it Chapter VII authority expires at the end
of the year, and second, the importance of conducting the
interviews before the interviewees disappear by being killed
or other means. 

OTHER ISSUES: NEW MINISTER OF JUSTICE,
UNIIIC PRESS SPOKESPERSON
------------------------------ 

13. (C )  Bellemare said he had a very positive impression of
new GOL Justice Minister Ibrahim Najjar, who had told
Bellemare he wanted to be helpful.  Najjar's predecessor,
Charles Rizk, was a vocal supporter of the Tribunal but also
known for public criticisms of Bellemare and the previous
Commissioner, Serge Brammertz.  Bellemare, a Canadian, noted
that Najjar had taught at McGill University in Montreal and
they had some mutual acquaintances. 

14. (SBU)  UNIIIC now has a press spokesperson who started
work the week before, Bellemare reported. The official had
good relevant experience as the spokesperson for the
Yugoslavia Tribunal and most recently for the UN Legal
Affairs office.  The new spokesperson is currently working up
a strategy for UNIIIC's press interaction. 

15. (C)  Bellemare said he had been advised by several
persons to not make statements in public that might be seen
as disrupting the current relative calm in Lebanon.  He
planned to follow that advice,  (NOTE: Bellemare traveled to
Saudi Arabia September 15, we understand.  We will seek
further information from UNIIIC contacts.  END NOTE.)
SISON

SECRET: CHINA ARMS EMBARGO

S E C R E T SECTION 01 OF 03 BRUSSELS 001510 

SIPDIS 

NOFORN 

E.O. 12958: DECL: 04/06/2014
TAGS: PARM PHUM PREL PINR EUN USEU BRUSSELS
SUBJECT: CHINA ARMS EMBARGO: APRIL 2 PSC DEBATE AND NEXT
STEPS FOR U.S. 

REF: A. USEU TODAY 04/06/04
     B. BRUSSELS 1464
     C. STATE 68263
     D. PRAGUE 390 

Classified By: USEU Poloff Van Reidhead for reasons 1.4 (b) and (d) 

-------
SUMMARY
------- 

1. (S/NF) The EU Political and Security Committee (PSC)
discussed the EU arms embargo on China during a heated 90
minute exchange on April 2.  PSC Ambassadors generally agreed
that the issue -- of whether, when and how to lift the
embargo -- should be sent back down to working groups for
further study before being presented to political groups for
a decision.  France objected, however, and succeeded in
getting agreement to discuss the issue at the April 26 FMs
meeting (GAERC) -- but failed in its campaign to secure an
early decision.  The debate will likely continue well into
the Dutch EU Presidency.  This cable draws on a detailed
readout and a sensitive internal report provided to Poloff by
UK and Hungarian contacts (please protect accordingly), as
well as background provided in recent days by other
interlocutors.  It also offers a strategy for continuing US
engagement. 

--------------------------------------
PSC Reacts Badly to Latest US Demarche
-------------------------------------- 

2. (S/NF) PSC Ambassadors reportedly arrived at the April 2
meeting to find copies of ref C demarche sitting on their
otherwise empty desks.  The demarche was received badly
because it gave the impression that "big brother was
watching," and because it appeared timed as a heavyhanded and
hubristic attempt to influence the PSC, according to our UK
contact.  Some reps, led by Greek Ambassador
Paraskevoupoulos, objected to the Council Secretariat's
distribution of the demarche under Council Secretariat cover
and with a Secretariat identifying number.  He argued that
the document had no business being circulated by the
Secretariat, and insisted that it be stricken from EU 

SIPDIS
records.  Ambassadors also reacted against what they
perceived as the threatening tone of our demarche. 

3. (S/NF) The Financial Times' front page article on April 2
about the US demarche campaign also enflamed the Ambassadors
because it appeared directly aimed at Friday's PSC
discussion.  Irish Ambassador Kelleher reportedly opened the
meeting by waving the article in the air and imploring his
colleagues to protect the confidentiality of internal EU
deliberations.  Poloff pointed out that the timing of the
latest US demarche was a coincidence, as we were previously
unaware that the PSC was scheduled to discuss the issue on
that day.  (COMMENT: Our demarche was received badly not so
much because of its substance, but because of the way it was
presented.  Our UK contact faulted the Irish and the Council
Secretariat for the way the demarche was handled in the PSC, 

SIPDIS
and also the awkward timing that made it seem, along with the
FT article, tailor-made to influence the April 2 discussion.
END COMMENT). 

-----------------------------------------
National Positions: France versus Denmark
----------------------------------------- 

4. (S/NF) According to our UK contact, France staked out a
"zero flexibility" position on lifting the embargo, and is
opposed to any talk of applying conditionality (i.e. by
insisting on further human rights progress by China and/or
strengthening the Code of Conduct prior to lifting the
embargo).  The Danes are reportedly still leading the
opposition, and have circulated to EU partners a list of ten
human rights conditions that they believe China should meet
before the embargo is lifted (we have not yet obtained a copy
of this list).  Other EU Member States are lining up
somewhere in between, although "all agree in principle" that
the embargo should be lifted if certain conditions are met.
The debate from now on will focus on defining conditions and
timing. 

5. (S/NF) Following is a summary of national interventions
made at the April 2 PSC: 

-- France: The embargo is anachronistic and must go; willing
to discuss timing but not conditionality because China would
not accept human rights conditionality; likewise would be
contradictory to enhance the Code of Conduct specifically for
China while also lifting the embargo; opposed also to making
Code of Conduct legally binding; wants issue to remain
political; opposed to sending it down to working groups. 

-- Denmark: Any decision to lift the embargo must be linked
to specific Chinese steps on human rights; EU also needs to
review Code of Conduct to ensure that lifting the embargo
does not result in increased arms sales to China. 

-- Germany: EU must consider regional impact of lifting the
embargo; now is not a good time to lift embargo (COMMENT: The
Germans appear to have moved closer to the Danes in recent
weeks, and are now the largest EU member state with serious
reservations about lifting the embargo.  One report of the
discussion suggests that "the tough German position, coupled
with the strength of US views, might be tempering French
enthusiasm."  END COMMENT). 

-- UK: Should be further study by working groups to identify
implications for human rights and regional stability, and to
examine options for strengthening Code of Conduct (COMMENT:
Our Hungarian contact reports that the UK is fundamentally
closer to the French end of the spectrum than the Danish.
The UK, like France, does not favor making the Code of
Conduct legally binding.  END COMMENT). 

-- Greece: Should explore gestures China could make on human
rights without explicitly linking them to lifting the
embargo; should not link regional stability to lifting
embargo; "provocatively" proposed that the Code of Conduct be
made legally binding.  (COMMENT: Our contacts report that the
Greek position on lifting the embargo is closer to France
than any other Member State.  END COMMENT). 

-- Ireland: Supports sending the issue back to working groups
(in part to keep the EU from making any decision during its
Presidency). 

-- Netherlands: Central consideration should be possible
release of political prisoners from the 1989 Tiananmen
crackdown. 

-- Czech Republic: Supports French position that issue should
remain political; silent on other points (COMMENT: Our UK
contact said that the Czech position is generally understood
to be informed by that country's interest in selling radar
equipment to China, as described ref D.  END COMMENT). 

-- Sweden: Working groups should further study issues of
human rights, regional stability, and enhancing the Code of
Conduct. 

-- Austria: Should explore gestures on human rights that
China could make but avoid linkage to lifting the embargo;
should conduct a general (i.e. non China-specific) review of
Code of Conduct. 

-- Italy: Intervened with same points as Austria. 

-- Belgium: More discussion needed of implications, including
on human rights, of any decision to lift embargo. 

-- Commission: Took no position on lifting embargo but said
EU should remain focused on human rights. 

Other member states did not intervene in the PSC discussion. 

-------------------------------------
Timeline: Back to the Working Groups?
------------------------------------- 

6. (S/NF) The PSC will meet again on this issue on April 7,
when it is expected to approve an "issues paper" which will
then be sent through COREPER to FMs for discussion at the
April 26 GAERC.  According to our UK and Hungarian contacts,
the paper is intended as a tour d'horizon for the GAERC
discussion.  It will not contain recommendations, and FMs are
not expected to take a decision.  Instead, they will likely
send the paper back down to the PSC for re-examination.  Most
PSC Ambassadors, having satisfied the French desire for a
ministerial discussion in April, will then press France to
accept the majority preference for sending the issue back to
the working groups.  The working groups would need two to
three months, minimum, to complete their assessments and
submit their papers to the PSC (EU working groups are
comprised of capital-based experts who rarely meet more than
once per month).  The relevant working groups are COHUM
(human rights), COASI (Asia Directors), and COARM
(conventional arms exports). 

7. (S/NF) What all this means is that the debate will likely
continue well into the Dutch Presidency.  Already, Member
States are beginning to look toward the December EU-China
Summit as a possible timeframe for any decision to lift the
embargo.  We have heard they are also looking at the US
electoral calendar and quietly wondering whether it would be
worth holding off their decision until November or December
in the hopes of sneaking it past the US radar.  They have not
and will not discuss such issues openly, even amongst each
other in the PSC, but our UK contact confirms that quiet
conversations and suggestive comments are going on in the
wings. 

---------------------
Next Steps for the US
--------------------- 

8. (S/NF) Our efforts have managed to slow down the momentum
in favor of removing the arms embargo, but have not killed
this idea outright.  In addition to the ongoing diplomatic
dialogue on this issue, we recommend the following steps to
help us keep the pressure on European governments: 

-- We should coordinate closely with Japan, and perhaps also
the ROK.  According to numerous EU interlocutors, the
Japanese have become increasingly active on this issue, but
their efforts appear so far uncoordinated with our own.
While this may have served our interests in the sense that it
gave the Europeans the impression that Japan's concerns were
genuine and not dictated by Washington, it is now time to
begin coordinating our efforts, so that Europeans recognize
that other key players in the region share our regional
stability concerns. 

-- We should engage the European Parliament, and particularly
members of its Human Rights Committee.  The EP is already on
record opposing an end to the embargo.  By calling attention
to EU deliberations and ongoing Chinese human rights abuses,
the EP could increase the political heat on member state
governments against any decision to lift the embargo. 

-- We should consider increasing our public statements and
press briefings for European audiences, on the assumption
that more scrutiny by European publics would help our views
on this issue, especially as regards human rights. 

-- We should increase our engagement with institutional and
member state representatives to the COHUM, COASI and COARM
working groups.  In this way we could ensure that our views
on human rights, regional stability and the Code of Conduct
are fully understood by those experts who will be supplying
recommendations to the political groups for discussion. 

-- Additionally, as suggested ref B, we recommend the USG
begin considering options for how the EU might strengthen
controls on arms exports to China in a post-embargo scenario.
 The worst case for us would be for the EU to lift its
embargo without having in place some sort of new mechanism
for controlling the transfer of arms and sensitive
technologies to China. 

Schnabel

SECRET: VLADIVOSTOK11, RUSSKIY ISLAND — THEY WILL BUILD IT, THEY WILL COME, THEN

INFO  LOG-00   EEB-00   AID-00   AMAD-00  CA-00    CIAE-00  COME-00
      INL-00   DODE-00  DOEE-00  DOTE-00  DS-00    FAAE-00  FBIE-00
      UTED-00  VCI-00   H-00     TEDE-00  INR-00   IO-00    LAB-01
      L-00     MOFM-00  MOF-00   VCIE-00  NSAE-00  ISN-00   OES-00
      NIMA-00  EPAU-00  MA-00    ISNE-00  SP-00    SSO-00   SS-00
      TRSE-00  NCTC-00  FMP-00   R-00     EPAE-00  SHEM-00  DSCC-00
      PRM-00   DRL-00   G-00     NFAT-00  SAS-00   FA-00    SWCI-00
      SNKP-00  SEEE-00  SANA-00    /001W

P 160724Z FEB 10
FM AMCONSUL VLADIVOSTOK
TO SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 1260
INFO CIS COLLECTIVE
ASIAN PACIFIC ECONOMIC COOPERATION
AMCONSUL VLADIVOSTOK
UNCLAS VLADIVOSTOK 000011

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PGOV ECON SENV RS
SUBJECT: RUSSKIY ISLAND -- THEY WILL BUILD IT, THEY WILL COME, THEN WHAT?

REF: 2009 Vladivostok 0087

1. Summary: Many were surprised when in 2007, then President Vladimir Putin announced that the 2012 APEC summit would be held on Russkiy Island, an empty, undeveloped island just South of Vladivostok. On February 5, 2010, Consular Officer and USAID Representative visited the island, taking the ferry from Vladivostok. Construction has commenced, and due to the work we saw, and the construction standards they are building to, we believe that the construction on the island will be completed in time for the APEC summit in autumn 2012 (Note that there is discussion about moving up the date of the summit two months from November to September due to the harsh winter weather).

They Will Build It and They Will Come

2. Russkiy Island was a closed, military island, little more than a place for camping or a good picnic in summer or ice fishing in winter. When it was announced that the 2012 APEC summit would be held on Russkiy Island, there was a lot of concern about the cost of the project, especially since Russkiy Island had no infrastructure. Everything for APEC would have had to have been built from scratch. The island lacked water and power, and the roads were only gravel. Actually, the roads were so treacherous and impassable at places that we were forced to turn around at one point and even assisted another car stuck in the snow.

3. On our drive around the island we were struck by the enduring aesthetic beauty of the well constructed brick and stone buildings dating from the czarist times. The island is also home to several distinctly unattractive Soviet era officers' residential apartment buildings that are the common concrete panel construction. There are two old forts and large artillery batteries that attest to the significant defensive role the island played in protecting Vladivostok during WWII. Governor Darkin maintains an impressive dacha on the island as does the President of Russia. There are no stores, gas stations, restaurants, or other amenities on the island. The few year-round residents rely on the ferry to the mainland for all their shopping needs.

4. Even though the weather was below freezing (-20 C), the construction was ongoing and a great deal of progress has already been made. The site preparations are being accomplished quickly as hundreds of hectares of forests are being or have already been clear-cut. The felled trees are being pushed aside into enormous piles by bulldozers. As there are no remaining obstacles to land leveling for foundation slabs, massive earth moving equipment is able to rapidly carve and reshape the natural rolling hills to accelerate construction. We did not see any evidence of erosion mitigation barriers in place, raising doubts about how well protected the marine environment will be around the island. Roads to and from the work sites from the dock yards have been constructed and several have already been paved with asphalt. The road substrates are typical for Russia - a mixture of course, ungraded, slate, rock, and dirt. No compression is applied to the substrates and only a thin layer of gravel is spread prior to paving.

5. The contractor is using relatively simple construction techniques for the buildings. The superstructure of all the buildings is steel I-beams with floors being poured in place on galvanized steel. Exterior walls are concrete blocks and mortar. The use of drop ceilings will permit the quick interior fit outs with ventilation and electrical wiring. This is essentially the construction form used for parking garages and shopping centers and is typical of the Tvoi Dom and Crokus City, and the Crocus-Expo International Exposition Center; Moscow facilities built, owned and operated by the billionaire Aras Agalarov, President of the Crokus Group and the general contractor for the Russkiy Island development project. This construction facades will be formed from glass, tile, metal or glass panels providing architectural detail and variety to the otherwise uninspired uniform rectangular blocks.

6. The water and sewage infrastructure seems to be being built to a higher standard than many other facets of the project. The contractor is using advanced double walled PVC pipes (not steel) and poured-in-place juncture housing for manhole access. Vladivostok itself has no sewage treatment facilities. We noticed that of the several manufacturers of excavation and land moving equipment are represented at the site; the vast majority of the equipment was Hitachi. We saw only one Caterpillar bulldozer and no Liebherr equipment so common on Sakhalin. A very large and elaborate "oceanarium" (ocean aquarium) is also under construction and should become an attractive tourist destination. Unfortunately, access to the aquarium construction site is restricted so we were unable to inspect it or get a close-up view.

7. Most of the thousands of construction workers appeared to be from Central Asia, although we heard that many nationalities are represented, including laborers from Mexico. There are several large camps for the laborers who are bussed to and from the construction sites on busses with Moscow license plates series `199 RUS', presumably because they are registered to Crocus, the Moscow based general contractor.

8. While we took a ferry, construction on the two large bridges that will connect the island to the mainland appears to be proceeding apace. Since the bridge is the most important part of the project (and at US$1.5 billion, the most expensive), the public believes that it is being constructed to international standards. As safety and quality are being taken into consideration for the bridge, this part of the project will likely pose the greatest challenge in meeting the deadline for the APEC summit. The general contractor for the bridge construction is a local company from Ussurisk that has no previous experience building bridges. We learned that the sand for the bridge's massive concrete trusses is being shipped by barges from North Korea.

9. While impressive progress is being made on the island's construction projects, it is apparent that speed is the top priority and environmental concerns, aesthetics, and perhaps quality are all to be sacrificed in order to ensure that the ambitious deadline is met.

Then What?

10. The 2012 APEC summit is meant to be the core of the greater Far East Development Program that will help develop the Russian Far East (RFE). Federal funding for numerous projects associated with APEC preparations is estimated to be $10 billion. One optimistic economist, specializing in municipal and regional strategic planning, expressed the opinion that that figure will be matched by private investment. However, a random survey of Vladivostok's taxi drivers reflected a more pessimistic belief that the project will attract no private investment and that at least half of the $10 billion from the GOR will be stolen. It is said that seven percent of all contracts will be given to the President's Office and the consensus seems to be that the entire project was conceived to facilitate the misappropriation of "budget" funds.

11. The plan is to locate a new Far Eastern Federal University (FEFU), a combination of all universities in the Vladivostok area, at the APEC site on Russkiy Island. The inconvenient location is creating a lot of concern among university students. FEFU will create a strong knowledge base and there is talk about creating an investment zone on Russkiy Island complete with business incubators for high-tech start-ups. However, while the recently adopted federal strategic plan for the development of the RFE through the year 2025 emphasizes the need to diversify the region's economy through the commercialization of innovative technologies, doubts remain about the ability of the region to compete in the technology sphere with its Asian neighbors.

12. If all goes well, preparations for the 2012 APEC summit will leave the Vladivostok area with a developed island, new bridges, an updated transportation system, renovated airport, opera house, "oceanarium", sports stadium, and many improvements to the city itself. There will be a residual effect for the citizens of Vladivostok as the city is expected to receive a new sewage treatment facility, installation of natural gas connections to residents throughout the city, and moving oil tanks from the downtown area. But the real test is whether Russia decides, and makes clear to its neighbors, that it is indeed open for business and welcomes new investment and joint ventures. That "improvement" could account for more foreign investment than all the shiny new projects combined.
ARMBRUSTER

CONFIDENTIAL: COMBATING ORGANIZED CRIME: ROUND ONE

VZCZCXRO0687
RR RUEHDBU RUEHFL RUEHKW RUEHLA RUEHNP RUEHROV RUEHSL RUEHSR
DE RUEHSF #0103/01 0411705
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
R 101705Z FEB 10
FM AMEMBASSY SOFIA
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 6700
INFO RUEHZL/EUROPEAN POLITICAL COLLECTIVE
RUEAIIA/CIA WASHINGTON DC
RUCPDOC/DEPT OF COMMERCE WASHINGTON DC
RUEAWJA/DEPT OF JUSTICE WASHINGTON DC
RUEATRS/DEPT OF TREASURY WASHINGTON DC
RHEHAAA/NATIONAL SECURITY COUNCIL WASHINGTON DC
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 SOFIA 000103 

SIPDIS 

E.O. 12958: DECL: 02/03/2019
TAGS: PGOV KCRM KCOR BU
SUBJECT: COMBATING ORGANIZED CRIME: ROUND ONE GOES TO THE
NEW GOVERNMENT 

REF: A. 09 SOFIA 508
     B. 09 SOFIA 548
     C. 09 SOFIA 642 

Classified By: AMB JAMES WARLICK FOR REASONS 1.4 (B) AND (D). 

1.  (C) Summary: Elected on an anti-corruption and organized
crime platform, the GERB government has made good on its
campaign promises and taken some positive steps.  Important
reforms, bolstered by political will from the top, have
ratcheted up the pressure against previously untouchable
organized crime figures and enabled marquee busts of a few
large well-equipped organized crime groups.  At the same
time, these arrests have highlighted weaknesses in the
judicial system as judges allow members of these groups to
make bail and delay proceedings despite prosecutors'
assurances of airtight evidence against them.  In private
meetings with the Ambassador, the government has confirmed
its commitment to fight organized crime, but this may be a
losing battle if it is unable to convince the judiciary to
make the reforms necessary to allow prosecutors to do their
jobs and keep dangerous criminals in prison.  End Summary. 

PROGRESS ON ORGANIZED CRIME AND CORRUPTION
----------------------------------------- 

2.  (C) In its short time in office, the government has
completed difficult reforms and personnel changes necessary
to make law enforcement more effective.   It has revamped law
enforcement by removing 26 of the 28  regional police chiefs,
many of whom were corrupt or incompetent, established
embassy-recommended interagency counter organized crime task
forces, and passed new laws to resolve jurisdictional
conflicts between the State Agency for National Security
(DANS) and the Ministry of Interior (MOI).  As a result,
coordination between law enforcement and the prosecutor's
office has dramatically improved.  Chief Prosecutor Boris
Velchev, a Socialist appointee, confided to the Ambassador
during a February 1 meeting that he has the complete support
of the PM and the government to "declare war" on the 200 to
300 most dangerous organized crime figures, including the 20
to 50 bosses who are household names (ref A). 

3.  (C) Structural reforms and clear political will have
brought some quick and convincing results, including
impressive operations in December against two notorious
organized crime gangs known as "the Impudents" and "the
Crocodiles."  The government arrested 30 members of the
Impudent gang believed to have carried out 19 high profile
ransom kidnappings over the past several years.  Breaking up
this group was a priority from day one for the new government
due to this group's use of sophisticated technology and
techniques along with the psychological effect the
kidnappings had on the population.  Similarly, the Crocodile
gang, composed mainly of car thieves and highway robbers,
terrorized mostly Turkish citizens driving through Bulgaria
to Germany. 

4.  (C) Most recently, the police launched operation
"Octopus" in which they arrested 12 people on February 10
believed to be involved in a powerful organized crime group
that has operated for the last 10 years.  These busts were a
public relations coup for the government in that they
targeted well-known groups that previous governments had been
powerless to stop.  The government has had even more success
arresting former government officials for corruption.  To
date, two former ministers have been indicted and five other
ministers from the previous two governments will likely face
corruption-related charges.  This is on top of at least 10
high-level arrests of mayors, judges, agency heads, and MPs
for corruption since last summer. 

JUDICIAL REFORM LAGS BEHIND
--------------------------- 

5.  (C) Despite successes on the organized crime and
corruption front, the powerful "big fish" mostly remain at
large due to the serious flaws in the overly formalistic
judicial system (ref B).  No case illustrates this better
than the Marinov brothers and the January 5 assassination of
Boris "Bobby" Tsankov.  Tsankov, a self-styled journalist and
entertainment figure with extensive underworld ties, was
gunned down in typical gangland fashion in downtown Sofia.
This unsolved murder is reminiscent of the approximately 140
other Mafia hits that have taken place in Bulgaria from 1993
to 2010.  It is widely believed that Krassimir "Big Margin"
Marinov and his brother Nikolay "Small Margin" Marinov
ordered the hit to prevent Tsankov from providing evidence to
the chief prosecutor's office.  The Marinovs have been
embroiled in serious organized crime and murder cases dating
back to 2005 (ref A), but were free on bail at the time of
the shooting thanks to legal loopholes that allow the
perpetual postponement of serious cases.  After the Tsankov
killing, Little Margin's whereabouts are unknown and Big
Margin was briefly detained for the killing before being
released due to a lack of evidence (he was later arrested
again on drug-related charges). 

6.  (C) Even the successful operation against the Impudent
gang has not been brought to a satisfactory conclusion.  Of
the 30 members initially arrested, 21 have been released from
jail, including one of the ringleaders, Anton "the Hamster"
Petrov.  Petrov was released on BGN 20,000 (USD 15,000) bail
after the Appeals Court determined that the MOI and
prosecutors had failed to provide new and convincing evidence
against him.  Since Petrov's release, two witnesses who were
cooperating with the police have reneged on promises to
testify against the kidnapping group. This is a familiar
pattern that has repeated itself in many other important
organized crime cases. 

REFORM EFFORTS FACE DIFFICULT HURDLES
------------------------------------- 

7.  (C) Chief Prosecutor Velchev and Minister of Justice
Popova told the Ambassador in separate meetings that reform
of the criminal procedure code had run into fierce opposition
from the "old guard" (politicians and judges) allied with
defense lawyers and NGOs using the language of human rights
to sink necessary reform.  Changes to the criminal procedure
code would close legal loopholes and likely speed up
organized crime and corruption cases, which drag on for years
in the current system (ref A).  Reforming the code is widely
viewed as essential to shift the balance from a system overly
favorable to defendants to a more just and effective system.
Among other things, the proposed changes to the criminal
procedure code would allow police to testify in court,
provide a back-up defense lawyer and increase fines if the
defendant's attorney fails to show up at court (a common
tactic for postponements), and simplify evidence collection
procedures.  Without radical reform, Minister Popova told the
Ambassador that Bulgaria's judiciary could not cope with its
entrenched organized crime problem.  Radical reforms such as
significantly changing how judges and prosecutors are
appointed, disciplined, and promoted (ref C) would require
constitutional amendments that need 161 of the 240 votes in
parliament to pass.  GERB is a minority government with 114
MPs, making constitutional reform difficult. 

8.  (C) Comment: The GERB government has set ambitious goals
in combating organized crime and has shown it has the
political will to fight established criminal enterprises and
entrenched interests.  Still, this will not be an easy fight,
and it will be difficult to achieve convictions and
reasonable sentencing of "big fish" if the judicial system is
not recalibrated to confront Bulgaria's organized crime
problem.  Radical judicial reform advocated by the Minister
of Justice will not happen overnight given the highly
independent and conservative judicial system and the daunting
constitutional barriers preventing rapid reform.  Despite
these challenges, incremental reform is possible with the
government's strong support.  In the end, the government will
be judged not on high profile arrests, but on its ability to
speed up corruption cases, close legal loop holes, and
successfully lock up previously untouchable organized crime
figures.  End Comment. 

WARLICK

Charter 77 After 30 Years-Original Signature Cards, Secret Police Files, U.S. Intelligence Reports Published for First Time

Signature card of Václav Havel.
harter’s Call for Rule of Law Deemed “Sedition,” “Subversion,” and “Harmful to National Interests Abroad” by Czechoslovak Communist Authorities in 1977

National Security Archive Electronic Briefing Book No. 213

Edited by Prof. Vilém Prečan (Czechoslovak Documentation Centre),
Dr. Svetlana Savranskaya and Thomas Blanton (National Security Archive)

Translations and editorial assistance by Derek Paton

Scanning and other research assistance by Catherine Nielsen, Maria Lorena Martinez, Dr. Mary E. Curry, and Petr Blažek

Washington D.C., January 6, 2007 – The Czechoslovak human rights activists who launched the landmark Charter 77 movement secretly gathered their first 240 signatures on handwritten cards without leaving copies with the signatories, but were arrested 30 years ago today by the secret police on charges of “subversion” and “hostility to the socialist state and social system” before they could deliver the original Charter to the Federal Assembly, according to Charter 77 and Czechoslovak secret police documents published in English for the first time on the National Security Archive Web site (www.nsarchive.org).

But the Chartists had already arranged for publication of their manifesto in the Western press, where the Charter was featured in major articles on January 7, 1977 in the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, Corriere della Sera, The Times of London, and Le Monde. The latter featured a cartoon of Soviet leader Leonid Brezhnev holding up a sign labeled “Helsinki,” in which a tiny citizen is holding up his own “Helsinki” sign – neatly encapsulating the contrast between the Soviet view of the 1975 Helsinki Final Act as ratifying the boundaries of Europe as imposed by Josef Stalin and World War II, versus the civil society focus on Helsinki’s human rights commitments (that even U.S. Secretary of State Henry Kissinger had dismissed as empty rhetoric at the time).

Yugoslav dissident Milovan Djilas subsequently called Charter 77 “the most mature and accomplished program produced by Eastern Europe from the war up to today” (New York Times, April 14, 1977).

Charter 77 co-spokesperson Václav Havel, one of those arrested on January 6, 1977 and subsequently president of Czechoslovakia and then the Czech Republic from 1989 to 2003, told reporters this week that Charter 77 could serve as a model for constructive political culture, because it brought together “people of diverse opinions, but unlike present-day Czech politicians they were not always searching for what they could harm the others with, but they cooperated and pulled all together” (CTK Czech news agency, January 1, 2007). In Havel’s reminiscences about Charter 77 (prior to the 1989 “velvet revolution”) he prophetically commented that “something had taken shape here that was historically quite new: the embryo of a genuine social tolerance” that “would be impossible to wipe out of the national memory.”

“Charter 77 was a bolt from the blue in the otherwise stagnant political atmosphere of Czechoslovakia,” remarked Professor Vilém Prečan, one of the editors of today’s Web posting and head of the Czechoslovak Documentation Centre in Prague. “Together with movements for human and civil rights in other countries of the Soviet bloc, Charter 77 became a vital factor working from below in the Helsinki process and towards the democratic revolutions of 1989.”

The Web posting includes:

  • original drafts of the Charter with handwritten edits by Václav Havel and Pavel Kohout (who originally proposed the name “Charter 77”);
  • typed and handwritten agendas for the conspiratorial meetings of the nascent Chartists in December 1976 and January 1977 to organize the gathering of the first signatures;
  • the original signature cards of Václav Havel and other leading Chartists;
  • the January 5, 1977 letter to the Federal Assembly signed by Charter’s three spokespersons that was confiscated by the secret police from Havel and his companions January 6 on their way to present the Charter to the authorities;
  • the first secret police report from January 6, 1977 calling the Charter a “crude attack” by “hostile elements” who “have been winning over other anti-socialist elements”;
  • the January 14, 1977 legal opinion by the Czechoslovak Communist authorities finding Charter 77 to be “untrue and grossly slanderous… clearly pursuing the aim of evoking hatred and hostility towards, or at least distrust of, the socialist social and state system of the republic”;
  • the secret police report from April 1977 recording the decision of the Communist Party Presidium not to prosecute anyone solely on the basis of signing the Charter, but on other grounds;
  • contemporary reporting on Charter 77 in previously secret documents by the CIA, the U.S. State Department;
  • Professor Prečan’s 1978 commentary on the impact of Charter 77;
  • contemporary U.S. official statements about Charter 77 from the Congressional Record and presidential documents;
  • Václav Havel’s own reminiscences about Charter 77, courtesy of Paul Wilson, who translated (from the Czech) Havel’s answers to questions from Karel Hvíždala for the 1990 book Disturbing the Peace (New York: Alfred A. Knopf).


Electronic Briefing Book
Note: The following documents are in PDF format.
You will need to download and install the free Adobe Acrobat Reader to view.

Section I: Charter 77 – The First Publication

January 6, 1977: “The Charter 77 Declaration” was unsuccessfully presented to the Czechoslovak authorities, and the would-be presenters were detained by the secret police.

January 7, 1977: “The Charter 77 Declaration” (dated 1 January 1977) reached the public in four daily newspapers abroad – the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, The Times, Le Monde, and Corriere della Sera. (Le Monde had, as usual, already gone to press the afternoon before the date written on the newspaper, but the organizer of the simultaneous publishing of the Declaration, Hans-Peter Riese, a German journalist and friend of Pavel Kohout’s, had failed to note this. The oversight turned out, however, to be very useful, keeping publication all on the same day.)

January 8, 1977: The New York Times and The Washington Post published their first stories on Charter 77, focusing on the detention of the Chartists. The Times included the quotation from the Communist Party newspaper Rudé právo warning dissidents that “those who lie on the rails to stop the train of history” must expect to get their legs cut off.

January 27, 1977: The full text of “The Charter 77 Declaration” was published in The New York Times as well as the U.S. Congressional Record.

Vilém Prečan’s introduction to Charter 77 from The Right to Know the Right to Act: Documents of Helsinki Dissent from the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe. Compiled and edited by the staff of the Commission on Security and Cooperation in Europe, Washington, D.C., May 1978.

Václav Havel’s reminiscences about Charter 77, reproduced with the kind permission of Paul Wilson, who translated (from the Czech) Havel’s answers to questions from Karel Hvížďala for the 1990 book Disturbing the Peace (New York: Alfred A. Knopf). This excerpt is from pages 125-145.


Section II: The Czechoslovak Documents

A. The Charter 77 Founding Documents
[Source: The Czechoslovak Documentation Centre, Prague – Note: The originals of most of the Czechoslovak documents published here are deposited in the Security Services Archive (archiv bezpečnostních složek), at the Ministry of the Interior, Prague]

Document 1. “Pavel Kohout Card.” Circa December 20, 1976
[Translation by Derek Paton]

This notecard typed by Václav Havel summarized the plan for how the organizers would proceed to organize the collection of signatures for the Charter 77 Manifesto. This “Pavel Kohout card” was prepared not later than on December 20 together with the final version of the Charter 77 Declaration. Every collector had an envelope with instructions on how to sign a signature card, and their own signed card as an example. The group of collectors was about ten people, who were instructed not to leave the statement with anybody until after the publication. After the publication the text of the Charter with all the signatures would be distributed to every person who signed it. Another provision defined how signatures would be checked at the meeting scheduled for December 29, 1976 (the deadline for collecting signatures) at 4 p.m. In the interview/memoirs Disturbing the Peace, Havel mentions how surprised he was when Mlynář came in with more than 100 signatures from former Communists.

Document 2. Original drafts of Charter 77 text

These early drafts of the Charter 77 manifesto include handwritten edits by Havel and Kohout. All the drafts were dated ten days after the actual document date—a decision made by the organizers to mislead the police. For example, the date proposed for the publication was noted as January 17, 1977, whereas it was actually set to be January 7. The draft dated December 27 was actually written on December 17. The handwritten page is by Kohout. The two drafts were discussed at meetings on December 16 and 17, and the final draft was agreed on December 18. The first draft was proposed by Havel. Kohout proposed the name Charter 77, which was adopted on December 18, 1976. Petr Uhl proposed to have three spokespersons instead of one.

Document 3. Draft agenda for January 3, 1977 meeting in Václav Havel’s apartment
[Translation by Derek Paton]

Václav Havel wrote and presented this draft agenda at the January 3, 1977 meeting at his apartment, and the document was later confiscated by the police during the house search on January 6, 1977. Fifteen people participated in the meeting (the room was overcrowded): all three spokespeople (Jan Patočka, Jiří Hájek, Václav Havel), Zdeněk Mlynář, Václav Černý, Ludvík Vaculík, Pavel Landovský, Jaroslav Šabata, Jan Tesař, Jiří Němec, and some other organizers. This was for a very long time the last quiet gathering of the Chartists undisturbed by the police.

Document 4. Original signature cards: Václav Havel, Jiří Hájek, Pavel Kohout, Zdeněk Mlynář, Jan Patočka, Rudolf Slánský, Ludvík Vaculík, and Prokop Drtina

Document 5. Charter 77 Letter to the Czechoslovak Federal Assembly signed by the three spokespersons (Jan Patočka, Jiří Hájek, Václav Havel), January 5, 1977
[Translation by Derek Paton]

This letter was meant to transmit the formal Charter 77 Declaration to the authorities, but on the morning of January 6, Czechoslovak State Security forces surrounded the car carrying Havel, Ludvík Vaculík, and Pavel Landovský, who were on their way to present the signed text to the Assembly and to the CTK news agency, as well as mail the Charter to all the signers. The police seized all the documentation, detained and interrogated not only the three but other co-signers, and searched their houses. But the process of releasing the Charter publicly, coordinated by Kohout’s friend Hans-Peter Riese with help from Czechoslovak émigrés who visited Prague for Christmas, had already put the text in the hands of journalists in Munich and elsewhere over the holidays, so the January 7 publication target was achieved despite the efforts of the state security forces.

B. The Authorities Respond to Charter 77

Document 6. Department of the National Security Corps, City of Prague. “Decision,” January 6, 1977
[Translation by Derek Paton]

This order from the Czechoslovak Secret Police (StB) began criminal proceedings of Charter 77 activists, accused of the crime of “subversion” (section 98 of the penal code) for their “hostility towards the socialist social and state system of the republic” in sending out “a crude attack” on the system. Remarkably, the document notes that these “hostile elements” actually “have been winning over other anti-socialist elements.”

Document 7. Department of Investigation, State Security Forces (StB). “Decision,” January 11, 1977
[Translation by Derek Paton]

This StB order adds yet more charges against the Chartists, now accused of damaging the interests and reputation of Czechoslovakia abroad (section 112 of the penal code) by disseminating abroad “untrue reports on conditions in the republic.”

Document 8. Statement on “The Charter 77 Declaration.” January 14, 1977
[Translation by Derek Paton]

This legal opinion by the Prosecutor General and the head of the Supreme Court of the Czechoslovak Socialist Republic, with their colleagues the Czech Minister of Justice and the chief prosecutor, concludes that the Charter 77 movement not only violates sections 98 and 112 of the penal code, as the StB already alleged, but also section 100 on “sedition.” These top legal authorities call Charter 77 “untrue and grossly slanderous… clearly pursuing the aim of evoking hatred and hostility towards, or at least distrust of, the socialist social and state system of the republic.”

Document 9. Information on the current results of the investigation into the case of “Charter 77,” about April 1, 1977
[Translation by Derek Paton]

This StB document notes that the criminal proceedings against the Chartists started on January 6, and by April 1, 1977, 251 persons had been interrogated. Most interestingly, the report refers to a decision made by the Czechoslovak Communist Party Central Committee Presidium that nobody should be charged specifically on the grounds of signing the Charter, but only on other grounds. This is the only known documentary reference to that Presidium decision.

Section III: U.S. Documents

Document 1. CIA National Intelligence Daily. January 28, 1977
[Source: Carter Presidential Library, CIA CREST database]

This CIA summary of current intelligence, circulated daily to top U.S. policymakers, reports speculation that the Czechoslovak regime might try to deport dissidents who signed Charter 77, especially Václav Havel, Pavel Kohout, Jiří Hájek, Jiří Lederer, Ludvík Vaculík. The item notes that out of nearly 300 signatories, 200 were harassed by the police but it is unlikely that they would agree to leave the country voluntarily.

Document 2. CIA National Intelligence Daily. February 8, 1977
[Source: Carter Presidential Library, CIA CREST database]

The daily CIA summary mentions that the Czechoslovak authorities are reluctant to issue indictments against dissidents directly linked to Charter 77, but at the same time are maintaining pressure on the supporters and trying to downplay its significance. The CIA also notes the Charter’s potential to create serious problems for the USSR with the approach of the Belgrade Conference.

Document 3. CIA Directorate of Intelligence, Intelligence Memorandum. “Dissident Activity in East Europe: An Overview.” April 1, 1977
[Source: Carter Presidential Library NLC-7-17-5-4-7]

This CIA overview notes the effects of the Soviet détente policy and the Helsinki accords as new factors in Eastern Europe. It emphasizes that “the Czechoslovaks have taken center stage among East European dissident intellectuals by their direct challenge to regime practices regarding civil rights, as outlined in ‘Charter 77,’” and the surprisingly large number of the “Chartists.”

Document 4. CIA National Intelligence Daily. July 14, 1977
[Source: Carter Presidential Library, CIA CREST database]

The CIA daily notes a new release of Charter 77 documents on cultural and literary censorship in Czechoslovakia, and reports that since the original manifesto was published, many dissidents have been silenced by official harassment, but that Zdeněk Mlynář, who took asylum in Austria, continues to work on behalf of Charter 77 by helping to organize Western pressure on the Czechoslovak authorities.

Document 5. Department of State, Bureau of Intelligence and Research. Weekly Highlights of Developments in Human Rights. “Hajek to give up leading Charter 77 role.” April 12, 1978
[Source: FOIA release to National Security Archive]

The State Department’s intelligence bureau reports that Jiří Hájek is considering resigning from his post as spokesman for Charter 77 as a result of internal factional disagreements in the movement and because of the growing strength of the more militant wing of the movement.

Document 6. Department of State, Bureau of Intelligence and Research. Weekly Highlights of Developments in Human Rights. “Dissidents draft statement.” August 16, 1978
[Source: FOIA release to National Security Archive]

The report mentions the first instance of cooperation between the Czechoslovak and Polish dissidents in issuing a joint statement of Charter 77 and the Polish Workers Defense Committee (KOR) on the anniversary of the Soviet-led military intervention of 1968.

Document 7. Department of State Bureau of Intelligence and Research. Weekly Highlights of Developments in Human Rights. “Polish-Czechoslovak dissident cooperation.” September 13, 1978
[Source: FOIA release to National Security Archive]

The INR weekly reports another case of cooperation between the Charter 77 and KOR, when Czechoslovak dissidents asked the Polish Committee to publish a statement on the harassment of Chartists by Prague authorities. According to information from the U.S. Embassy in Prague, as many as 50 Chartists might be considering emigrating as a result of constant police surveillance and harassment.

Document 8. Department of State Bureau of Intelligence and Research. Weekly Highlights of Developments in Human Rights. “Police move to prevent contacts with Polish dissidents.” October 12, 1978
[Source: FOIA release to National Security Archive]

INR reports that Charter 77 spokesman Jaroslav Šabata was arrested in connection with his efforts to organize cooperation between the Czechoslovak and Polish dissidents. The report mentions that the Czechoslovak police might have penetrated the Charter 77 movement and decided to move against the Charter activists to prevent wider contacts between dissidents of the two countries.

Document 9. Department of State, Bureau of Intelligence and Research. “The Human Rights Movement in Czechoslovakia.” October 11, 1979
[Source: FOIA release to National Security Archive]

This detailed eight-page report traces the accomplishments of Charter 77 movement and the obstacles it had to face on the eve of its third anniversary. Charter activities are said to have focused Western attention on the repressive character of the Czechoslovak regime. The latter’s crackdown on the dissidents has opened a new breach between Communist parties in the East and West, set back the regime’s attempts to gain international acceptability, and caused some embarrassment to Moscow in its attempts to pursue détente policy with the West. However, the report describes the Charter’s prospects in accomplishing its goals as “bleak,” because “the regime has all the necessary levers of power and coercion at its disposal and will not hesitate to use them if threatened,” and due to a lack of popular support outside the intelligentsia circles. “Despite these bleak prospects, the movement deserves respect, admiration, and sympathy for its ability to survive thus far and for its willingness to confront the regime in the face of overwhelming odds.”

Document 10. Office of Public Liaison Submission from the Czechoslovak National Council of America. “Czechoslovakia since Belgrade: Compliance with the Provisions of the Helsinki Final Act.” April 17, 1980
[Source: Carter Presidential Library, Office of Public Liaison Files]

The Czechoslovak émigré organization provided the Carter White House with this report documenting recent police harassment of the Charter 77 movement activists and their family members. The report describes the trial of six signatories of the Charter in October 1979 as “only a small sample of the violations by the Czechoslovak authorities of their international obligations and accepted standards of justice.” All six were found guilty of the crime of subversion of the republic and were sentenced to prison terms ranging from two to five years. The report also deals with police actions against young people, discrimination in education, and severe limitations on freedom of information.
Section IV. U.S. Official Statements on Charter 77

Document 1. Department of State Comments on Subject of Human Rights in Czechoslovakia. Department of State Bulletin, January 26, 1977

In this first official U.S. statement on Charter 77, Fredrick Brown, Director of the Office of Press Relations, reads a statement to the press noting the signing of Charter 77 – “some 300 individuals [in Czechoslovakia] have petitioned the government to guarantee the rights accorded them by the Czechoslovak Constitution, the international covenants on civil and political and on economic, social and cultural rights, and by the Helsinki Final Act.” He called on all the signatories of the Final Act to “strongly deplore the violations of such rights and freedoms wherever they occur.” The diplomatic cables from the U.S. Embassy in Prague that provided the basis for this statement are the subject of current Freedom of Information Act requests by the National Security Archive but are not yet declassified.

Document 2. The Helsinki Spark. Remarks by Hon. Dante Fascell, House of Representatives, January 26, 1977

Congressman Fascell talks about the wave of dissent in the countries of Eastern Europe and calls it “the thirst for liberty.” He notes the repressive response of the Communist authorities throughout the region and the resolve of Charter 77 signatories in Czechoslovakia. “In the context of the Helsinki agreements—whose implementation the Congress formed the Commission on Security and Cooperation in Europe to evaluate—the campaign against freedom and human rights amounts to a breach of a crucial promise.” He asks for the full translation of the Charter 77 Manifesto to be reprinted in the Congressional Record.

Document 3. Czechoslovakia and Charter 77. Remarks by Hon. James Blanchard, House of Representatives, February 2, 1977

Congressman Blanchard informs the House about his protest to the Czechoslovak ambassador against the harassment of the dissidents by the authorities. A full translation of the Charter 77 Manifesto is included in the remarks.

Document 4. Statement by the President of the United States Ronald Reagan. Czechoslovak Human Rights Initiative. December 31, 1986. Weekly Compilation of Presidential Documents, vol. 22, no. 53 p. 1681

Ronald Reagan gives high praise to the accomplishments of Charter 77 movement on the eve of its tenth anniversary. He emphasizes that “Charter 77, Eastern Europe’s longest lasting human rights initiative, served for ten years as a champion of civil and human rights, a repository for national values, and a cultural and publishing network at home and abroad…. By their activities, Charter 77 signers have in countless small and large ways pushed back the gloom over Czechoslovakia’s barren political landscape.”

Document 5. The 10th Anniversary of Charter 77 in Czechoslovakia. Remarks by Hon. Steny Hoyer, House of Representatives, January 7, 1987

Congressman Hoyer introduced a resolution to commend the Charter 77 human rights organization on the tenth anniversary of its establishment, and emphasized its contribution to the achievements of the Helsinki Act: “Ten years after the birth of Charter 77, the quiet, relentless push for dialog has found partners—in likeminded movements throughout Eastern Europe.”

Document 6. Human Rights and Charter 77 in Czechoslovakia. Remarks by Hon. Dante Fascell, House of Representatives, January 29, 1987

Congressman Fascell commends highly the achievements of Charter 77 as “the beacon of hope and light, not just for the people of that unfortunate country, but throughout Eastern Europe.” He informs the House that the members of the U.S. Helsinki Commission had nominated Charter 77 as a candidate for the Nobel Peace Prize in 1987.

Document 7. Helsinki Commission Chairman Nominates Czechoslovak Human Rights Activist for Nobel Peace Prize. Remarks by Hon. Dennis DeConcini, U.S. Senate, February 7, 1989

Senator DeConcini notes that the whole world is watching Czechoslovakia, where Václav Havel remains in prison. “In spite of relentless harassment by the authorities, including imprisonment, repeated detentions, house searches and confiscations of property, Havel has remained active in the struggle for human rights.” Senator DeConcini and Representative Hoyer have nominated Václav Havel for the 1989 Nobel Peace Prize.

DUBIOS- STALKER UND ERPRESSER LAUT SPIEGEL, SZ, FAZ, HANDELSBLATT, BÖRSE ONLINE: “GoMoPa” UND DEREN HINTERMÄNNER – MUTMASSLICH RESCH, EHLERS UND BENNEWIRTZ

Bernd Pulch, Magister Artium

siehe

Presse-Links hier

Opfer wehren sich: “DUBIOS IST JOCHEN RESCH LAUT “SPIEGEL” WEGEN SEINER STASI-KONTAKTE

http://www.spiegel.de/spiegel/print/d-65717414.html

VERBRAUCHERSCHUTZ

Dubiose Doppelrolle

Eine merkwürdige Personalentscheidung des Deutschen Instituts für Anlegerschutz (DIAS) sorgt für Aufsehen: Als neuen geschäftsführenden Vorstand beriefen die Mitglieder des auf die Untersuchung unlauterer Finanzgeschäfte spezialisierten Instituts Ehrenfried Stelzer. Bis zur Wende war Stelzer Leiter der Sektion Kriminalistik an der Ost-Berliner Humboldt-Universität. Die Sektion galt als Stasi-Hochburg, Stelzer selbst diente der Stasi Jahrzehnte als “Offizier im besonderen Einsatz”. Im April war Stelzers Vorgänger Volker Pietsch, der als Finanzspezialist von der Verbraucherzentrale Berlin gekommen war, zurückgetreten. Die Hintergründe von Pietschs Abgang sind unklar, hängen aber möglicherweise mit der unsoliden Finanzsituation des DIAS zusammen. Seit der Gründung vor fünf Jahren ist der Verein wesentlich von Zuwendungen der Berliner Anlegerschutz-Kanzlei Resch abhängig. Deren geschäftsführender Gesellschafter Jochen Resch ist nicht nur DIAS-Mitglied, sondern auch Vorstand der Verbraucherzentrale Brandenburg – eine Doppelfunktion, die Resch dem Vorwurf aussetzt, sich über das DIAS Mandanten zu beschaffen. Resch bestreitet das. Das DIAS sei unabhängig konzipiert “und nie eine Mandantenschaufel” gewesen. Auch der neue DIAS-Vorstand Stelzer gilt als Resch-Mann. Man kenne sich “lange Jahre”, so Resch. Eine von Stelzers ersten Amtshandlungen war es, den gesamten zehnköpfigen Beirat, die meisten darin Juristen, abzuberufen.

und

SZ_03.09.2010_Am_virtuellen_Pranger

und

http://www.faz.net/artikel/C30857/cyberstalking-im-netz-30321544.html

und

http://www.faz.net/artikel/C30350/wirtschaftskriminalitaet-grossrazzia-wegen-verdachts-auf-insiderhandel-30309286.html

und

http://www.handelsblatt.com/finanzen/boerse-maerkte/boerse-inside/finanzaufsicht-untersucht-kursachterbahn-bei-wirecard/3406252.html

und

http://www.victims-opfer.com/?page_id=11764

ÜBER DIE ZUSAMMENHÄNGE ZWISCHEN “GoMoPa” UND GOOGLE:

DAS SYSTEM “GoMoPa”-Google

ETHIKBANK: “GoMoPa” IST TABU

SECRET: THE BRAZILIAN CONNECTION WITH IRAN AND

R 121450Z DEC 86
FM AMEMBASSY BRASILIA
TO SECSTATE WASHDC 1591
INFO AMCONSUL RIO DE JANEIRO
AMCONSUL SAO PAULO
AMCONSUL PORTO ALEGRE POUCH
AMCONSUL RECIFE POUCH
AMCONSUL SALVADOR DA BAHIA POUCH
BELO HORIZONTE POUCH
AMEMBASSY COLOMBO
AMEMBASSY TEGUCIGALPA
AMEMBASSY MANAGUA
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 BRASILIA 13835 

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY 

E.O.12356: N/A
TAGS: PARM PREL BR IR HO NU CE
SUBJECT:  THE BRAZILIAN CONNECTION WITH IRAN AND
THE CONTRAS 

REFS: (A)BRASILIA 13511, (B)BRASILIA 4799 

1.  (U) WITH THE UNRAVELING OF THE IRANIAN
ARMS/CONTRA AID SCANDAL, THE BRAZILIAN PRESS
CONTINUES TO POINT TO A SO-CALLED "BRAZILIAN
CONNECTION".  WEEKLY NEWS MAGAZINE "VEJA" AND
CONSERVATIVE "O ESTADO DE SAO PAULO" RAN STORIES
IN THE LAST FEW DAYS ON THE SUPPOSED BRAZILIAN
INVOLVEMENT. 

2.  "ESTADO'S" DEFENSE EDITOR ROBERTO GODOY WROTE
ABOUT ALLEGED U.S. ATTEMPTS TO OBTAIN HAWK
MISSILES FROM BRAZIL IN 1986, AN UNUSUAL REQUEST,
ACCORDING TO GODOY, FOR BRAZIL DOES NOT HAVE SUCH
SYSTEM IN ITS INVENTORY.  THE FIRST CONTACT, GODOY
SAID, WAS MADE IN EARLY 1986 BY AN "ADVISOR" TO H.
ROSS PEROT TO A LOCAL ARMS PRODUCER, AND THE
SECOND IN MAY, TO A FORMER MEMBER OF THE BRAZILIAN
NATIONAL SECURITY COUNCIL INVOLVED WITH THE ARMS
INDUSTRY.  GODOY EXPLAINED THAT THE AMERICAN
PROPOSED TO TRADE HAWKS FOR THE MORE ADVANCED
SPARROW, NOT SPECIFYING WHERE THE WEAPONS WOULD
GO.  IN BOTH INSTANCES, HE CONTINUED, THE AMERICAN
WAS TURNED DOWN BECAUSE THE BRAZILIANS SUSPECTED
THE CONTRAS OR IRAN AS RECIPIENTS AND SAID
GOVERNMENT RULES WOULD NOT ALLOW SUCH "NEBULOUS"
TRANSFERS OR SALES TO A NATION AT WAR.  GODOY ALSO
REFERRED TO JAIRO IWAMASSA GUINOZA'S CONNECTION
(SEE REFTEL A) RESTATING THAT GUINOZA WAS NEVER
ABLE TO PURCHASE ANY ARMS FROM BRAZILIAN
MANUFACTURERS. 

3.  "VEJA'S" STORY CLAIMS TO PRESENT "PROOF" OF
BRAZILIAN INVOLVEMENT WITH THE CONTRAS AND IRAN,
BUT IT IS SHORT ON EVIDENCE AND SOURCES.  ONE OF
THE "PROOFS" IS A RECENT PHOTOGRAPH OF FIVE BOXES
OF HAND GRENADES MADE BY COMPANHIA DE EXPLOSIVOS
VALPARAIBA IN SAO PAULO.  ACCORDING TO THE
ARTICLE, THE GRENADES WERE SHIPPED TO SRI LANKA IN
1984 AND IT SPECULATES THAT SOME OF THEM WERE
DIVERTED TO HONDURAS FROM SOUTH AFRICA, A PORT
STOP ALONG THE WAY.  "VEJA" DOES NOT KNOW HOW MANY
CONTRABAND WEAPONS ENDED UP IN THE CONTRA'S
TRAINING CAMP, NOR THE SIZE OF THE ORIGINAL
SHIPMENT TO COLOMBO, BUT SUGGESTS THAT THE
TRANSFER WAS MADE WITH THE CONSENT OF THE BUYER,
FOR SRI LANKA DID NOT PROTEST THE INCOMPLETE
SHIPMENT.  ANOTHER "PROOF" WAS FINDING TWO
HONDURAN AIR FORCE OFFICERS TRAINING AT EMBRAER
ALSO IN 1984.  HONDURAS HAD SIGNED A US DOLS 10
MILLION CONTRACT "FINANCED BY RONALD REAGAN'S
GOVERNMENT" FOR THE PURCHASE OF TUCANOS.  IN
"VEJA'S" OPINION, NICARAGUA NOW HAS EVIDENCE TO
MAKE A CLAIM FROM ITAMARATY ON BRAZIL'S SUPPORT TO
NICARAGUA'S FOES. 

4. (U) "VEJA" ALSO REHASHES THE STORY OF U.S.
CITIZEN GEORGE PERRY'S DEATH IN 1983 IN NEW YORK.
SUPPOSEDLY PERRY WAS KILLED BECAUSE HE DIDN'T
FULFILL HIS PART ON A US DOLS 20 MILLION DEAL TO
DELIVER ARMS TO IRAN, AND THE GOB'S VISA REFUSAL
FOR THE U.S. INVESTIGATOR OF THE CRIME.  IN
ADDITION, VARIOUS ATTEMPTS AT SHADY SALES TO
AFRICA AND THE MIDDLE EAST IN THE EARLY 80'S ARE
DESCRIBED. THE STORY ENDS WITH THE UNDOCUMENTED
ASSERTION THAT IRAN PURCHASED IN 1983 US DOLS 500
MILLION WORTH OF "EXPLOSIVES" AND THAT SINCE THEN
THE GOB HAS "TENDED TO IRAN'S REQUESTS" INCLUDING
SENDING A "PLANE LOAD OF ARMS" LAST WEEK. 

5.  (LOU) COMMENT:  THE BRAZILIAN PRESS IS
SEARCHING FOR BRAZILIAN INVOLVEMENT IN THE
US/IRAN/CONTRA ARMS TRAFFIC BUT SO FAR THE
EVIDENCE IS NOT CONVINCING.  MOST OF THE INSTANCES
CITED BY THE PRESS OCCURRED A FEW YEARS BEFORE THE
U.S. BEGAN ITS SECRET CONTACTS.  ATTEMPTS AT SALES
MUST HAVE CERTAINLY BEEN MADE INDEPENDENT OF U.S.
EFFORTS.  IN ADDITION TO THE ABOVE, "JORNAL DO
BRASIL" REPORTED IN JUNE 1984 NEGOTIATIONS FOR THE
SALE OF ONE MILLION GRENADES TO A SUBSIDIARY OF
THE VALPARAIBA COMPANY MENTIONED ABOVE.  ENOUGH
TALES OF INTRIGUE AND POTENTIALLY EMBARRASSING
SHADY ARMS DEALS MIGHT MAKE THE GOB CONSIDER THE
ADVANTAGES OF REQUIRING A NON-TRANSFER TO THIRD
PARTIES CLAUSE IN THEIR ARMS SALES CONTRACTS, A
REQUIREMENT NOT INCLUDED IN THEIR CURRENT ARMS
SALES POLICY GUIDELINES (SEE REFTEL B). 

SHLAUDEMAN

TOP-SECRET FROM THE CIA-ARCHIVES: INTERNATIONAL CRIME THREAT ASSESSMENT

DOC_0001346397

STRENG VERTRAULICH: GEHEIMREPORT DES BUNDESTAGES ZU GEHEIMGEFÄNGNISSEN IN DEUTSCHLAND

secret-prisons-report-germany

CONFIDENTIAL: DEFLATED EXPECTATIONS FOR MERKEL’S DREAM COALITION

VZCZCXYZ0001
PP RUEHWEB

DE RUEHRL #0153/01 0341656
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
P 031656Z FEB 10
FM AMEMBASSY BERLIN
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 6467
INFO RUCNFRG/FRG COLLECTIVE PRIORITY
C O N F I D E N T I A L BERLIN 000153

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 02/03/2020
TAGS: PGOV PREL EFIN ECON GM
SUBJECT: DEFLATED EXPECTATIONS FOR MERKEL'S DREAM COALITION
AFTER FIRST 100 DAYS

REF: 2009 BERLIN 1528 

Classified By: Deputy Chief of Mission Greg Delawie for reasons 1.4 (b, d).

1. (C) Summary: One hundred days after Germany's black-yellow coalition took office, a strong, unified government led by Chancellor Merkel has yet to materialize. The much anticipated “dream coalition” comprised of Merkel's Christian Democratic Union (CDU), its Bavarian sister the Christian Social Union (CSU), and Free Democratic Party (FDP) which promised a unified conservative approach to the economy and “like minded” thinking on social welfare, the environment, and foreign policy has become bogged down in party politics with no end in sight. Recent polls show that the bickering may be at least partly to blame for the FDP's 5.6 percent fall in the polls, with it now down to 9 percent from its historic 14.6 percent election results (see septel) and the CSU plummet to an historic low of 41 percent. Indeed one minister is now threatening resignation. Sources from the three coalition parties have admitted to problems, blaming the other coalition parties, and downplaying their significance. Merkel has come under criticism within her own party for not taking strong public stands and reining in her coalition partners, instead staying above the political fray. The opposition, particularly the Social Democratic Party (SPD), is trying to capitalize on this “divided we rule” coalition with an eye toward unseating a teetering CDU-FDP coalition in North-Rhine Westphalia (NRW) in May elections, thereby tipping the CDU-FDP Bundesrat majority in its favor. Merkel is counting on better economic and political indicators after the NRW election followed by the release of the annual tax forecasts to congeal the coalition. If the CDU/FDP coalition fails in NRW, coalition divisions are likely to become more pronounced. End Summary.

Off to a Rocky Start
---------------------

2. (C) Concluding a coalition agreement in only three weeks, prior to her November 2 departure for Washington to address Congress and in time for the 9 November 20 year anniversary of German unity may have been Chancellor Merkel's first and only major success to date in marshaling coalition unity. But the feat may have had consequences. The haste to sign has left half-resolved differences on tax cuts, economic policy, Afghanistan, Turkey, health care, data protection (see reftel) and other issues that continue to gurgle to the surface. Important to recognize is that each party is operating under its own political pressures from different voting constituencies. The FDP's main goal is to deliver on campaign promises – particularly tax relief – and shore up its base, the CSU is desperate to regain its dominance in Bavaria, and the CDU is seeking to rebuild its eroded voter base. All three parties and the opposition are now gearing up for May 9 elections in NRW. This election in Germany's most populous state, referred to as a “small national election,” is regarded as a partial vote of confidence on the national coalition, and will determine the Bundesrat majority. If the NRW CDU-FDP coalition fails to return to government, the national CDU-FDP coalition will fall by six seats in the Bundesrat – from 37 to 31 seats – it will lose its majority. Such a loss could well hamper the government's ability to pass major financial or economic legislation.

3. (C) Each of the three coalition parties have pointed to the others for instigating tension. CDU party contact xxxxx accused the FDP of functioning as if it were still in the opposition. Senior SPD parliamentarian Hans-Ulrich Klose attributed the coalition strains to the FDP adjusting to being in government after 11 years in the opposition. FDP contact xxxxx accused the CDU/CSU of reacting to their own internal problems: for the CDU, its controversy over the Kunduz airstrike, and for the CSU, its involvement in a major bank scandal. The FDP also points to the CSU's strong rivalry with the FDP, with which it now governs in Bavaria. The CSU is still trying to recover from its historic low voting results in the September 2008 state elections, which forced it for the first time in 46 years to govern within a coalition. All parties, however, have downplayed the significance of the feuds, with senior CDU party operative xxxxx explaining in January that the party leaderships are just now settling in after an exhausting election campaign and intense coalition negotiations. He hoped (more than predicted) that the parties would soon settle into a more cooperative relationship. In January, Merkel called a small summit for coalition leadership with Westerwelle and Seehofer to smooth things over and commit to a new beginning. While the coalition's political edginess receded for a time, policy divisions continue to surface.

CDU/CSU vs FDP – the Economy
-----------------------------

4. (C) While CDU/CSU and FDP voters may be the most likely to cross over to the other party, their mainstay voter bases are different, with the CDU/CSU appealing to economically conservative voters who also support the social market economy, but are socially conservative. The FDP base is composed of free-market advocates, who are socially liberal and strong advocates of civil liberties. The FDP's campaign and continuing mantra has been for much larger tax cuts in 2011, worth 20-24 billion euros, apparently at the expense of both coalition unity and the better judgment of economic experts. The cuts would make getting the deficit back under the EU ceiling of 3 percent of GDP by 2013 nearly impossible. National debt will rise from 66 percent of GDP to 80 percent. There are growing public concerns over rising debt, but also about perceived disarray in the coalition's tax and budget policies. Merkel insists that a decision regarding the tax reduction plans will not be taken before May, when the overall tax revenue forecast is due. Waiting until May also means the coalition will not have to go public with unpopular consolidation measures until after the NRW elections. Finance Minister Schaeuble (CDU) appears unenthusiastic at best about further tax cuts. He has already said deficit reduction measures would have to start in 2011. The CSU has also called the FDP's call for speedy tax relief measures “unrealistic” despite the fact that it had included such a demand during its election campaign. The most recent squabble between the FDP and CSU is over FDP Health Minister Roesler's plans for health care reform which foresees more care options and the introduction of competition. Seehofer has rejected the proposal, holding fast against radical changes to the system. Roesler has indicated he might resign over this issue.

Foreign Policy
--------------

5. (C) Coalition feuding over economic and tax policy has trumped coalition divisions over foreign policy, although FM Westerwelle has managed a few disruptions in the latter. As a harbinger of hard times to come, as one of his first actions, Westerwelle opposed the naming of CDU Bundestag member Erika Steinbach to the foundation “Flight Expulsion and Reconciliation” citing possible damage to relations with Poland. As President of Germany's Federation of Expellees, Steinbach is disliked in Poland. While the numbers are disputed, the expellee community, which mainly votes CSU or CDU, has exerted influence on the issue. National and State CDU and CSU politicians came out in support of Steinbach with only Merkel keeping mum. The controversy continues, despite ongoing attempts to reach a compromise, threatening to drain coalition attention and good-will.

6. (C) Coalition strains have also surfaced on the issue of overseas deployments. Regarding a troop increase in Afghanistan, Westerwelle's position was at first muddled, as he tried to reflect his party's general negativity toward overseas military deployments while at the same time tending to his role as Germany's chief diplomat in the run-up to the London Conference. In the end, he (together with the opposition) likely played a role in achieving a lower-than-expected troop increase. Westerwelle also convinced the CDU to agree on gradually reducing German participation in UNIFIL. The CSU also rocked the coalition boat on Afghanistan, with Seehofer expressing general skepticism on a troop increase, although he later came around. In addition, CSU Secretary General Dobrindt has ridiculed the federal government's reconciliation concept in Afghanistan as a “cash for clunkers version for the Taliban.”

Comment
---------

7. (C) Chancellor Merkel may have ironically cast off the yoke of the Grand Coalition only now to be encumbered with a new FDP-CSU double yoke, restrained by an FDP bent on delivering on campaign promises and a CSU distracted over its rivalry with the FDP and internal problems. High expectations for the “dream coalition” are certainly in part to blame for the current polls, with popularity numbers for Merkel and Westerwelle both having suffered. Worried most, however, are the CDU and FDP politicians in NRW, who fear that the national coalition's squabbling could negatively impact their own chances in the May 9 elections. The leadership threesome – Merkel, Westerwelle, and Seehofer – may make an extra effort to get along, or at least appear to get along, as the NRW elections near. It is not clear that Westerwelle and the FDP, however, believe that it is the squabbling that is unhelpful, or rather its own inability to

deliver as yet on certain campaign promises. If it is the latter, more coalition tensions could ensue as Westerwelle begins to expend more energy as FDP Chairman and less as Foreign Minister, gearing up his party for its NRW campaign. Berlin is once again becoming bogged down in political squabbles as the NRW elections near.

8. (U) Consulate Munich contributed to this cable.

Murphy

CONFIDENTIAL: FORMER DEFENSE MINISTER ZU GUTTENBERG REVEALS STRUGGLE

VZCZCXRO6323
OO RUEHDBU RUEHFL RUEHKW RUEHLA RUEHNP RUEHPW RUEHROV RUEHSL RUEHSR
DE RUEHRL #0157/01 0351607
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
O 041607Z FEB 10
FM AMEMBASSY BERLIN
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 6478
INFO RUCNAFG/AFGHANISTAN COLLECTIVE PRIORITY
RUEHZL/EUROPEAN POLITICAL COLLECTIVE PRIORITY
RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY
RUEKJCS/JOINT STAFF WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY
RHEHNSC/NSC WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY
RHMFISS/HQ USEUCOM VAIHINGEN GE PRIORITY
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 BERLIN 000157 

SIPDIS 

E.O. 12958: DECL: 02/03/2020
TAGS: PREL MARR MOPS NATO GM AF
SUBJECT: DEFENSE MINISTER ZU GUTTENBERG REVEALS STRUGGLE
WITH FM WESTERWELLE ON TROOP INCREASE FOR AFGHANISTAN 

REF: A. BERLIN 138
     B. BERLIN 112 

Classified By: AMBASSADOR PHILIP D. MURPHY. REASONS: 1.4 (B) AND (D). 

1.  (C) SUMMARY.  Defense Minister zu Guttenberg revealed in
a February 3 meeting with Ambassador Murphy that coalition
partner FM Westerwelle -- not the opposition Social
Democratic Party (SPD) -- had been the single biggest
obstacle
to the government seeking a bigger increase in German
troops for Afghanistan.  But even with the modest planned
troop increase of 500 (with 350 more in reserve), zu
Guttenberg said a restructuring of the current Bundeswehr
presence would allow Germany to increase the number of
soldiers involved in the training of Afghan National Army
(ANA) by more than 1,000.  While Westerwelle has portrayed
his skepticism about additional troops as principled, it
was also motivated by a desire to put zu Guttenberg "in his
place."  While the size of the troop increase is settled,
the length of the new ISAF mandate remains open.  The
government is hoping to have the new mandate approved by
the Bundestag before the end of February, with significant
(if not majority) support from the opposition SPD and
Greens.  END SUMMARY. 

WESTERWELLE: BIGGEST OBSTACLE 

2. (C) In explaining the lower-than-expected planned
increase in the number of German troops for Afghanistan, zu
Guttenberg told the Ambassador that Westerwelle's opening
position in the coalition negotiations on the new mandate
had been "not one additional soldier."  In that context, it
had been difficult to get agreement on any increase at
all.  (Comment: Zu Guttenberg proposed 1,500 additional
troops at the initial January 4 mini-cabinet meeting on
this issue.  End Comment.) 

DOING A LOT MORE WITH A LITTLE MORE 

3. (C) To help justify the need for more troops, zu
Guttenberg said he had forced the Bundeswehr to do a
complete review of all the existing positions in
Afghanistan, which had confirmed that some could be
eliminated in light of the new ISAF counterinsurgency
strategy.  He said a restructuring of the current
Bundeswehr presence, combined with the troop increase,
would boost the number of soldiers involved in the training
of the Afghan National Army (ANA) from 280 to 1,400.  The
restructuring includes turning the battalion-size quick
reaction force based in Mazar into a "protection and
training" battalion.  A second such battalion will be
created in Kunduz by augmenting the existing infantry
company there with new troops.  Zu Guttenberg reiterated
that Germany strongly supports COMISAF's focus on
protection of the population and partnering with the Afghan
national security forces (ANSF), and that the German
"trainers" (i.e., the two new maneuver battalions) will
operate in the field with the ANSF. 

PUTTING ZU GUTTENBERG IN HIS PLACE 

4. (C) While zu Guttenberg said he is avoiding public
comment on whether the outcome of the coalition talks on
the new mandate is a "victory" for him or Westerwelle, FDP
Defense Policy Spokesman Elke Hoff told poloff separately
that Westerwelle's hard line against additional troops had
been motivated in part to "teach zu Guttenberg a lesson."
She claimed that zu Guttenberg had been too presumptuous
last fall in making speeches in Canada and the U.S. about
how Germany would significantly increase its troop
contribution to ISAF.  He might have been able to get
agreement on a higher ceiling had he engaged
parliamentarians first and showed "greater respect for the
political process." 

OPEN QUESTION: LENGTH OF THE MANDATE 

5. (C) Zu Guttenberg confirmed that the cabinet would
formally agree on the proposed new ISAF mandate February 9
and that the first reading in the Bundestag would be
February 10.  FM Westerwelle is scheduled to speak on
behalf of the government in introducing the proposed
mandate.  The government is aiming to hold the final
Bundestag vote on the mandate -- following two weeks of
committee hearings -- on February 26.  Zu Guttenberg was 

BERLIN 00000157  002 OF 002 

confident that a large number (if not a majority) of
opposition politicians from the SPD and Greens would vote
in favor of the new mandate. 

6. (C) A February 2 meeting of state secretaries
tentatively agreed that the new mandate should run, as is
the custom, for one year, expiring in February 2011.  Zu
Guttenberg indicated, however, that it might be preferable to
stick to the length of the current mandate, which expires
in December 2010.  He expressed concern that having the
mandate lap over into early 2011 could lead to a premature
debate on withdrawal, before the new strategy really had a
chance to work.  (Comment: Another option under
consideration -- and favored by some in the Chancellery --
is a 18-month mandate, so that any debate on the future of
the troop presence would be put off until the fall of
2011.  But the MFA objects that this would only raise the
ire of the opposition and give them an excuse to oppose the
mandate.  End Comment.) 

REASSURING THE GERMANS ON COMMAND OF THE NORTH 

7. (C) Zu Guttenberg confirmed that Germany very much
welcomed the planned inflow of U.S. forces into the north,
especially the helicopter assets, which filled a
long-standing shortfall.  He noted, however, that many in
Germany question whether the U.S. will be willing to accept
continued German leadership of RC-North in view of the
increased U.S. presence.  Ambassador Murphy assured him
that the U.S. had no issues working for the German command in
the North.
Murphy

CONFIDENTIAL: WESTERWELLE ON AFGHANISTAN, IRAN, TAC NUKES

C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 BERLIN 000164 

SIPDIS 

E.O. 12958: DECL: 02/05/2020
TAGS: OTRA MARR NATO PARM PINS PREL PGOV GM AF IR
SUBJECT: WESTERWELLE ON AFGHANISTAN, IRAN, TAC NUKES 

Classified By: Classified by Political M-C George Glass for reasons 1.4
 (b,d). 

1.  (C) German FM Westerwelle told Amb February 5 that it was
important to refocus Afghanistan efforts on civilian
reconstruction; that we needed to avoid suggesting German
troops engaged in less risk than other countries; that he did
not invite Iranian FM Mottaki to Germany or seek a meeting
with him; that any discussion of non-strategic nuclear
weapons needed to be conducted at 28 at NATO; and that he
could not influence any decision by the European Parliament
on the SWIFT agreement.  END SUMMARY.
2.  (C) The Ambassador asked about Westerwelle's first 100
days in office.  Though in an ebullient mood, Westerwelle
said things were very difficult (FDP slipped another
percentage point in the polls hours before the meeting).  He
said he had been in France February 4 for a joint cabinet
meeting, but that nothing substantive came of it.  He
observed that one never really knew what was going to happen
with Sarkozy involved. 

--------------
AFGHANISTAN
------------- 

3.  (C) The Ambassador reviewed his own recent trip to
Afghanistan.  He shared his impression that the Germans were
doing a superb job at all levels from the RC-North commander
on down.  He learned how critical mentoring and partnering
with Afghan security forces had become.  He noted that the
U.S. was sending substantial forces to RC-North, where they
would conduct training and be under German command.
Westerwelle responded that this was important for Germany and
for international cooperation.  The Ambassador added that the
U.S. was sending substantial helicopter support as well.  He
said that Germans could be proud of their troops in
Afghanistan.  Westerwelle responded that this was good news.
He said that the London Conference bore an excellent
conclusion, and was particularly useful for its focus on
civilian progress.  He emphasized the importance of
underscoring civilian reconstruction.
4.  (C) With a request for confidentiality, Westerwelle
referred to the January 20 "Bild Zeitung" interview with
General McChrystal, in which the general is quoted as urging
the Germans to take more risks.  Westerwelle recounted that
he himself had had to answer questions about this article for
ten days, explaining that the Germans were not "peace
soldiers" while  other countries provided the combat troops.
He said it was important that German troops not be
"relativized" and cast as second-class troops.  He observed
that Germany had originally deployed 3,500 troops, increased
that mandate to 4,500, and was now planning an increase of
another 500 plus a reserve.  He emphasized that this was a
major contribution compared with other European countries.
5.  (C) The Ambassador noted that he had gained the
impression in Afghanistan that police training was more
challenging than he had originally understood.  Troops were
usually required to provide force protection.  But German
police training was the best.
6.  (C) The Ambassador asked how the prospective February 26
Bundestag debate to extend the Bundeswehr mandate in
Afghanistan would play out.  Westerwelle said the question
was how large a majority would approve the new mandate.  He
said that SPD caucus chief Steinmeier displayed good will on
this issue.  However, SPD chairman Gabriel wanted to
politicize the issue for domestic political gain.
Nevertheless, he thought some in the SPD would support the
new mandate.  However, Westerwelle expected no support from
the Greens.  Westerwelle noted that the May NRW state
elections were also affecting the issue in a negative way.
That said, he said he could not see Steinmeier opposing the
larger mandate.  He hoped the Ambassador would speak with
Steinmeier. 

------
IRAN
------ 

7.  (C) Asked about the February 5 visit of Iranian FM
Mottaki to the Munich Security Conference, Westerwelle
emphasized that he (Westerwelle) had not invited Mottaki to
come to Germany, and Westerwelle had also not requested a
meeting with Mottaki.  Rather, it was Mottaki who was asking
to see Westerwelle.  Westerwelle said he had still not
decided whether he would talk to Mottaki or not.  He
reflected concern that Tehran might try to exploit Mottaki's
visit to Germany as a distraction, and continue executing
people during the visit.  In any case, Westerwelle said his
position was exactly the same as the U.S. on Iran, and he
would share the results of any meeting with Mottaki, if it
took place. 

BERLIN 00000164  002 OF 002 

8.  (C) Westerwelle said he would meet Russian FM Lavrov and
(separately) Chinese FM Yang February 5.  He suggested that
Moscow had been changing course on Iran sanctions since the
Qom revelations.  The Russians now saw Iran as playing games
on the nuclear issue.  However, he observed that China was
"hesitant," or even in opposition to sanctions.  Reflecting
on his recent visit to China, Westerwelle said he had not
perceived any "good will" there at present.  He said he would
ask Yang again about Iran and then share the results with the
U.S.  Westerwelle opined that it was important also to focus
on Brazil as an opinion leader in the Third World.  He noted
that President Lula had received Ahmadinejad warmly several
months ago.  He added that he was uncertain what the Saudis
thought, but that the other Persian Gulf countries seemed to
be in an existential panic about the Iranian nuclear program. 

-----------
TAC NUKES
----------- 

9.  (C) Touching briefly on arms control, Westerwelle stated
unequivocally that tactical nuclear weapons was an issue for
NATO.  He said that when he had received Kissinger, Schulz,
Perry and Nunn on February 3 to talk about their global zero
proposal, tactical nuclear weapons was not discussed.  He
said that the four statesmen were very supportive of
President Obama. 

----------
TFTP
--------- 

10.  (C) The Ambassador raised the challenge of getting the
European Parliament to approve an agreement to share data
with the U.S. on tracking terrorist finance.  The Ambassador
noted the extensive efforts of the Treasury Department and
other U.S. agencies to explain the importance of the program
to our common security.  He asked how one could get better
support for the program.  Westerwelle replied that the German
government had been able to come up with a solution for
itself a few months ago when the issue first surfaced.
(Comment: In fact, German Interior Minister de Maziere's vote
to abstain in the EU Council vote on TFTP on November 30
reflected the complete deadlock within the Coalition
Government between TFTP advocates in the CDU-controlled
Interior Ministry and TFTP opponents in the FDP-controlled
Justice Ministery. End Comment.) However, Westerwelle said
that now that the issue was in the European Parliament, he
had no ability to influence it.  He said that he was very,
very aware of the Secretary's interest in this issue.
Nevertheless, he had a sense that almost all groups in the
European Parliament had concerns with the proposed agreement.
 He emphasized that this was not an issue that only concerned
his party, the FDP, but rather many others as well.
11. (C) Westerwelle shared that he had not yet appointed a
new Coordinator for German-American cooperation. 

----------
COMMENT
--------- 

12.  (C) Westerwelle (who spoke with ease in English) was in
a buoyant mood and more confident on his issues than we have
seen him so far.  He seemed ready to defend any intimation
that he was less than supportive of a troop surge (Defense
Minister zu Guttenberg told the Ambassador two days ago that
Westerwelle had worked for no increase of German troops for
Afghanistan, see Berlin 157) with invocations of the
importance of civilian reconstruction.  On Iran, he leapt at
the chance to tell us he had not invited Mottaki.  His dodges
on both tactical nuclear weapons and terrorist finance were
all but practiced.  His comment that he was unable to affect
the vote in the EU Parliament on TFTP was a bit disingenuous;
on February 4, an MFA official acknowledged to visiting
Treasury officials in Berlin that German MEPs were in fact
leading the charge against TFTP in the EU Parliament with the
tacit support of the FDP, if not of specialists in the
Justice Ministry and MFA themselves. Westerwelle still cuts a
good image in meetings and in the press here, even though his
party continues a bout of free fall in the polls.  His
ministry, though, still wonders (privately to us) where he
gets his policy direction from.  END COMMENT.
13.  (U) The Ambassador did not have the chance to clear this
cable before departing Berlin. 

Murphy

TOP-SECRET CIA-REPORT: NORTH KOREA’S ENGAGEMENT: PERSPECTIVES, OUTLOOK, AND IMPLICATION

DOC_0001346397

TOP-SECRET: SARAH PALINS TELEPHONE HACK REVEALED

TOP-SECRET:FUKUSHIMA PLANT DIA

TOP-SECRET: CHINESE RESEARCH ON HIGH MICROWAVE AND EMP-WEAPONS

Doc011

TOP-SECRET FROM THE CIA ARCHIVES: BIN LADIN PREPARING TO HIJACK US AIRCRAFT AND OTHER ATTACKS

DOC_0001110635

STRENG VERTRAULICH: DAS SCHILY-EL-MASRI-DOSSIER

schily-el-masri_schily-el-masri-antworten-11-10-2006

schily-el-masri_schily-el-masri-befragung-12-10-sta-m-03-11-2006

schily-el-masri_schily-el-masri-sta-m-nachforderung

schily-el-masri_schily-el-masri-sta-m-fragen-18-05-2006

TOP-SECRET: CIA ARCHIVES DOCUMENT-WARNING OF WAR IN EUROPE

DOC_0001486834

SECRET: THE SAUDI SHI’A: WHERE DO THEIR LOYALTIES LIE?

VZCZCXRO1004
PP RUEHDE
DE RUEHRH #3312/01 1221455
ZNY SSSSS ZZH
P 021455Z MAY 06
FM AMEMBASSY RIYADH
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 6969
INFO RUEHZM/GULF COOPERATION COUNCIL COLLECTIVE
RUEHLO/AMEMBASSY LONDON 2585
RUEHFR/AMEMBASSY PARIS 0526
RHEHNSC/NSC WASHDC
RHEHAAA/WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON DC
S E C R E T SECTION 01 OF 05 RIYADH 003312 

SIPDIS 

SIPDIS 

DHAHRAN SENDS
PARIS FOR ZEYA, LONDON FOR TSOU 

E.O. 12958: DECL: 05/02/2016
TAGS: PGOV PREL PINS SA
SUBJECT: THE SAUDI SHI'A:  WHERE DO THEIR LOYALTIES LIE? 

REF: A. RIYADH 3301
     B. RIYADH 1196
     C. RIYADH 888 

Classified by Consul General John Kincannon for reasons 1.4
(b) and (d). 

-------
Summary
------- 

1.  (S) Some Sunni Arab leaders, including Egypt's President
Mubarak and Jordan's King Abdullah, have recently publicly
questioned the loyalties of Arab Shi'a populations in the
Middle East.  Privately, senior Saudi officials raise similar
concerns.  Given the ongoing sectarian conflict in Iraq,
increasing regional tensions vis-a-vis Shi'a Iran, and the
tenuous status of Saudi Shi'a within their own country, the
question of whether Saudi Shi'a loyalties belong primarily
with Saudi Arabia - or, alternatively, to their
coreligionists elsewhere in the Gulf - is a timely one.  It
is also of central concern to U.S. strategic interests in the
region, given the concentration of Saudi Arabia's Shi'a
population in its oil producing areas. 

2.  (S) Our conclusion, based on discussions with a broad
spectrum of Saudi Shi'a contacts over the past eight months,
is that most Saudi Shi'a remain committed to the agreement
reached between the Saudi Shi'a leadership and King Fahd in
1993-4, whereby Shi'a leaders agreed to pursue their goals
within the Kingdom's political system in return for the
King's promise to improve their situation.  Saudi Shi'a have
deep religious ties to Iraq and Iran and are inspired by the
newfound religious freedom and political power of the Iraqi
Shi'a; they also have a lengthy history of persecution by the
Al-Saud and face continuing discrimination (ref B).
Nonetheless, their leaders still appear committed to working
for reform from within, a strategy that, thanks to King
Abdullah, is slowly bearing fruit.  In our view, it would
require a major internal or external stimulus to move the
Saudi Shi'a toward confrontation with Riyadh.  Such stimuli
could include a major shift in SAG policy or leadership, the
spread of uncontained sectarian violence to the Kingdom, or a
major change in regional security arrangements, especially
escalating regional conflict involving Shi'a (ref C).  Absent
these circumstances, the vast majority of Saudi Shi'a are not
likely to demonstrate significant external political
loyalties, either to Iran or to any inchoate notion of a
"Shi'a crescent."  End summary. 

--------------------------------------------- --------
A Tactical Choice:  Advocating for Rights from Within
--------------------------------------------- -------- 

3.  (SBU) At 1.5 to 2 million strong, the Shi'a comprise 10
to 15 percent of Saudi citizens.  They are concentrated in
the Eastern Province (EP), particularly the oasis areas of
Qatif (where the population is overwhelmingly Shi'a) and
Al-Ahsa (a mixed Sunni-Shi'a area).  Saudi Shi'a do not have
the breadth of tribal and clan ties to Iraq and Iran as do
the Shi'a of Kuwait and Bahrain, though at least one major
Shi'a tribal confederation, the Al-Tamim, are present in
Iraq, Iran, and Saudi Arabia. 

4.  (SBU) The Wahhabi Saudi state has a long record of brutal
persecution of both Saudi Shi'a and Shi'a living elsewhere in
the region.  During the military raids of the first and
second Saudi states in the 18th and 19th centuries, Shi'a
were a frequent target of Wahhabi Saudi violence, including
an all-out attack on major Shi'a cities in southern Iraq and
the desecration of holy sites there.  When the founder of
modern Saudi Arabia, King Abdulaziz, conquered what is now
the EP, his fanatical Ikhwan army went on a murderous
anti-Shi'a rampage.  A watershed moment in this troubled
history came in 1979 when thousands of Shi'a, angry at the
state, inspired by the Iranian revolution, and organized by a
young group of leaders, most notably Hassan Al-Saffar, took
to the streets of Qatif in protest.  The SAG cracked down,
killing a number of the protesters and arresting many
activists.  Hundreds of Shi'a, including Al-Saffar, went into
exile, initially to Iran but later leaving Iran for Syria,
Lebanon, the UK, the U.S., and other western countries.
Al-Saffar and many of his political allies returned to Saudi
Arabia in the mid 1990s after reaching a deal with King Fahd
in 1993-4.  The King agreed to allow the exiles to return, to
release Shi'a detained in the Kingdom, and to take steps to
improve the situation of the Shi'a; for their part, the
returning Shi'a agreed to cease their opposition activities
and pursue their goals within the Saudi system. 

5.  (C) Why did the exiled Shi'a return?  According to
Mohammed Al-Mahfooth, one of their number and now
editor-in-chief of a journal on contemporary Islamic issues,
"There were two main reasons.  First, we realized that, as a
minority in Saudi Arabia, we could never hope to change the
regime by revolution, as we might have thought in 1979.
Second, we felt we were losing touch with our communities
here, and we were not effective at helping them to develop
from abroad.  So we decided to come back and work for our own
rights from within."  We have heard similar explanations from
other Shi'a who were part of the exile movement.  As a group,
exiled and indigenous leaders made an important tactical
decision in the late 1980s and early 1990s.  Realizing that
they could not wrest control over their destiny from the SAG
by opposition and confrontation, they changed their goal to
realizing their civil rights as Saudi citizens and their
tactics to pushing for reform from within.  The same tactical
calculus remains relevant today. 

6.  (C) Shi'a activists have consistently emphasized to us
their continued commitment to pushing for civil rights and
reform within the system; in the words of one of their
leaders, "Any place there is room, we are trying to use it."
We see considerable evidence that the Shi'a are indeed taking
full advantage of every opportunity, especially with the
ascension of King Abdullah, whom the Shi'a view as friendly
to their aspirations.  They were active participants in the
petition movement in the last years of King Fahd's reign,
signing petitions calling for reform both as a community and,
as individuals, in conjunction with other (Sunni) reformers.
The Shi'a successfully organized to win all the municipal
council seats in EP areas where they enjoyed demographic
predominance.  The Qatif municipal council, with Jafar
Al-Shayeb as its president, will likely prove to be the most
organized and active of any in the EP. 

7. (C) The Shi'a are also pushing the boundaries of what the
SAG allows in terms of civil society (ref A), organizing
unregistered but tolerated activities ranging from regular
cultural and political forums to computer and astronomy clubs
to underground film showings.  Of the five people appointed
to the Dammam branch of the National Society for Human Rights
(NSHR), at least four are Shi'a activists, including
Al-Shayeb.  The Shi'a are pushing for greater religious
freedom and a reduction in discrimination through the NSHR
and via direct appeal to senior SAG leaders, albeit with
limited success.  Pointing to these activities and to their
vision of a Saudi Arabia where all citizens enjoy civil
rights, some of our contacts argue that the Shi'a are the
true Saudi nationalists and reformers. 

8.  (C) Another indication that the Shi'a are, at least for
now, committed to working within the system is that Shi'a
leaders and activists from a variety of backgrounds are
gravitating toward this tactic and that they are actively
building bridges with other reform elements in Saudi society.
 The returned exiles are the most politically active Saudi
Shi'a, were the major force in brokering the 1993-4 deal with
King Fahd, and are in the forefront of most of the
initiatives mentioned above.  (Note: While they do not form a
single political block, they are sometimes referred to as
"Shirazis" because at the time of their exile many of them
followed the late Ayatollah Mohammed Al-Shirazi, who
advocated that clerics should play a greater political role
in demanding Shi'a rights, although Shirazi opposed the
concept of wilayat al-faqih.  End note.)  Other Shi'a
activists, both secular and religious, have also adopted the
tactic of pushing for reform from within, although they do
not have the same broad organizational networks of the
Shirazis.  These activists include former leftists like Najib
Al-Khunaizi, who hosts one of the regular cultural forums in
Qatif, and purported Saudi Hezbollah leader Hassan Al-Nimr,
who participated in the most recent National Dialogue in
Abha.  The Shirazis, Al-Khunaizi, Al-Nimr, and other Shi'a
leaders are also making efforts to reach out to secular and
religious reformers from Sunni society, trading visits to
each other's forums and majlises and seeking other means for
dialogue. 

--------------------------------------------- ----
Iran:  Religious Ties but Few Political Loyalties
--------------------------------------------- ---- 

9.  (S) While there are strong religious ties between the
Saudi Shi'a and Iran and the potential for Iranian influence
in the EP is a legitimate concern, especially given the
increasing bellicosity of Iranian rhetoric and policy, our
best assessment is that, under prevailing conditions, the
Shi'a are not looking to Tehran for political guidance. 

10.  (S) As argued in ref C, given the importance of the EP
to Saudi Arabia's oil industry, Iran has a strategic
rationale for laying the groundwork to exert its influence.
It also has a history of doing so.  The Iranian revolution
inspired the Saudi Shi'a to rise up in opposition in 1979,
and the Iranians played a role in organizing Saudi Hezbollah
in the 1980s.  Most Saudi Shi'a clerics have studied
extensively in Iran, especially Qom, and many politically
active Shi'a spent time in Iran in the early and mid 1980s.
A militant Saudi Shi'a group, at least inspired if not
directed by Iran, carried out the attack on the Al-Khobar
military barracks in the summer of 1996.  More recently, a
few of our Shi'a contacts have claimed that there are active
pro-Iranian networks in the Qatif area and alleged other
signs of Iranian activity, although a much larger number of
others discount these claims.  (Note:  Recent sensitive
reports from other channels also suggest possible Shi'a links
with militant Shi'a in Iran, Iraq, and/or Lebanon.  One
report suggests that Iranian-affliated Iraqi militias may
have begun low-key efforts to establish contacts in the EP,
and another report suggests that one Saudi Shi'a may have
visited a Lebanese Shi'a leader to seek financial support.
End note.) 

11.  (S) The vast majority of our Shi'a contacts, however,
have told ConOffs that they see no evidence of current
Iranian efforts to exert political influence in the EP.  Our
contacts, who include community activists, political leaders,
journalists, businessmen, cultural figures, academics, and
sheikhs, many of whom studied in Iran, are also generally
skeptical of Iranian motives as they pertain to Saudi Arabia.
 We heard over and over variants of the following statement:
"We were used by Iran before, and we won't let it happen
again.  Their interests are completely different than ours."
Indeed, the exiled Shirazis appear to have left Iran in the
mid 1980s because it became clear they were being used:
several contacts independently told us that the group left
because they refused Iranian pressure to organize or take
credit for sabotage operations against Saudi oil
installations. 

12.  (C) Time and time again, Shi'a sheikhs have explained
that the Saudi Shi'a prefer to study in Najaf or Karbala
(where Arabic is spoken everywhere, including outside the
religious community), have much stronger historical ties to
religious institutions in Iraq, and studied in Qom only
because Saddam Hussein's regime made it impossible for them
to study in Iraq.  They also caution that a Shi'a who has
studied at a hawza in Qom would not necessarily share a
pro-Iranian religious or political perspective and note that
all the important ayatollahs, including those from Najaf,
have hawzas in Qom.  All of our contacts concur that among
Saudi Shi'a who emulate a marja' or mujtahid, the large
majority of Saudi Shi'a follow Iranian-born but Iraq-based
Ayatollah Ali Al-Sistani, with the rest divided among a
number of other ayatollahs. 

13. (S) The current role and activity of Saudi Hezbollah
remains a question mark about which we have been able to
develop only limited information.  Some contacts claims the
group no longer exists, but prevailing evidence suggests that
it encompasses a small group of religious figures who believe
in the concept of wilayat al-faqih, emulate Iran's Supreme
Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamene'i as their marja', but have few
current followers.  Our contacts report that its leaders are
not very active politically, do not take their cue from the
Iranian regime, and do not espouse violence (at least not
currently, in all three cases).  While we continue to seek
additional information on Saudi Hezbollah, what limited
knowledge we have supports the views espoused by our
contacts.  We do not know of any anti-SAG or anti-American
violence ascribed to any Saudi Shi'a group since the Khobar
Towers bombing in 1996; at least one of Saudi Hezbollah's
purported leaders has participated in the National Dialogue
(suggesting that the SAG does not consider the movement or
the individual as much of a threat and that he supports the
Dialogue's concept); and we have heard that other Shi'a
leaders have, over time, convinced Saudi Hezbollah's leaders
that violence would not help the Shi'a cause.  We cannot rule
out the possibility that Iran or its proxies could recruit
and train small Saudi Shi'a cells to carry out disruptive or
terrorist activities.  However, we cannot see such cells
developing a broad following given the present Shi'a
leadership and their strategy unless there are major changes
in the regional political landscape. 

------------------
The Impact of Iraq
------------------ 

14.  (C) The Saudi Shi'a follow events in Iraq with intense
interest.  In stark contrast to non-Shi'a Saudis, most Shi'a
express support for the U.S. intervention in Iraq despite the
current strife and violence.  Many Shi'a contacts have
explicitly thanked ConOffs for the U.S. role in freeing their
coreligionists in Iraq from Saddam Hussein's oppressive
regime and helping them obtain political power commensurate
with their numbers.  Saudi Shi'a feel deep emotional and
religious ties to Iraq and look forward to visiting Shi'a
holy sites and participating in religious festivals there as
soon as the security situation permits.  The expanded
political and religious freedoms for Shi'a in Iraq have
empowered Saudi Shi'a to push further than they previously
dared against SAG restrictions on religious freedom and civil
society.  For example, contacts have linked expanded Ashura
celebrations in Qatif, as well as more cautious expressions
of Shi'a identity elsewhere in the Kingdom, directly to the
new situation in Iraq. 

15.  (S) However, although Saudi Shi'a are certainly aware
that Shi'a form a significant part of the population on the
Arab side of the gulf, to date we have seen no indication
that the Saudi Shi'a have any realistic vision of a pan-Arab
Shi'a political block.  Any such realization of an Arab
"Shi'a crescent" would have to be led by Iraqi Shi'a, and at
this point, as several contacts have noted to us, domestic
challenges occupy their full attention.  Saudi Shi'a are not
currently traveling to Iraq in significant numbers, and
political and religious contacts between Saudi and Iraqi
Shi'a post-Iraqi liberation, while they have occurred, appear
to have been limited to date. 

--------------------------------------------- ---
The Future of the Shi'a Strategy and U.S. Policy
--------------------------------------------- --- 

16.  (S) Will the Shi'a strategy of seeking to realize their
rights as Saudi citizens by engaging the SAG hold firm over
the next several years?  We believe that it will, as long as
the SAG does not backtrack on reform through a change in
policy or leadership and/or as long as there are not
compelling external pressures or influences that change their
calculus of interests.  Although Shi'a leaders have
frequently expressed to us their frustration with the slow
pace of reform and with the continued discrimination against
the Shi'a community, they have invested a great deal in the
strategy of engagement and it is slowly bearing fruit in the
form of some advances in religious freedom (in Qatif at
least) and civil society.  If the SAG does backtrack, e.g. by
clamping down harshly on unlicensed civil society
organizations or undoing the limited measure of religious
freedom recently gained by the Shi'a, or if other elements of
the current equilibrium change, the strategic calculations of
the Shi'a leadership could change as well.  While we have not
seen any signs of radical young Shi'a leaders who disagree
with the goals or tactics of the current leadership, such
leaders could emerge if sectarian violence initiated by Sunni
extremists spreads uncontained to Saudi Arabia, if the
employment situation for young Shi'a worsens, if Ayatollah
Sistani is succeeded by a more radical cleric as marja' to
most Saudi Shi'a, or if conflict breaks out with Iran. 

17.  (S) The argument outlined above, that the Saudi Shi'a
remain committed to a strategic choice to push for
realization of their rights as citizens from within the Saudi
system and, under current conditions, do not entertain any
serious external political loyalties, has several important
implications for U.S. policymakers.  Most Saudi Shi'a
currently see their interests as directly aligned with U.S.
interests in key respects, particularly with the U.S.
interest in promoting participatory governance and human
rights in the Middle East as an antidote to extremism.  They
appreciate any pressure the U.S. puts on the Saudi government
to reform, although they wish the U.S. would increase this
pressure and worry that other interests, such as regional
stability and security of the oil supply, cause the U.S. to
draw back from urging greater steps toward political reform. 

18.  (S) The most important implication of this argument is
therefore that it is unlikely that the vast majority of Saudi
Shi'a would support Iranian or Iranian-proxy interference in
Saudi Arabia as long as the current equilibrium holds,
particularly the promise for gradual reform.  King Abdullah
embodies this promise of reform, particularly for the Shi'a,
and with good cause:  no less a figure than Prince Talal bin
Abdulaziz told the Ambassador that King Abdullah has decided
to give Saudi more religious freedom as part of an effort to
better incorporate them into Saudi national life.  By
supporting the reform process, the U.S. is also playing a
role, an important one in Shi'a eyes, in maintaining the
current equilibrium.  (Comment:  As suggested in ref C, the
USG can certainly use SAG concern about potential Iranian
influence as one means of urging the SAG to grant fuller
rights to its Shi'a citizens.  End comment.)  A secondary,
more tactical implication is that the Saudi Shi'a currently
make natural allies in U.S. efforts to promote political
reform and human rights in Saudi Arabia.  Post is already
directing some programmatic resources in this direction and
will explore this potential further in a later cable. 

-------
Sources
------- 

19.  (SBU) This cable draws on hundreds of conversations over
the past eight months between CG, PolOff, and PAO and a
diverse group of Saudi Shi'a contacts, as well as on related
observations and on publicly available sources such as Saudi
Shi'a websites and other reports.  We have reported many of
these conversations and observations in previous cables
(NOTAL), including RIYADH 964, RIYADH 179, RIYADH 42, 2005
RIYADH 9142 (reform, Iran, Iraq); RIYADH 3306, RIYADH 1741,
RIYADH 1380, 2005 RIYADH 7589, 2003 RIYADH 2698 (reform);
RIYADH 1706, RIYADH 1377, RIYADH 1252 (civil society); RIYADH
1461, RIYADH 280, RIYADH 275 (Shi'a leadership); 2005 RIYADH
9048, 2005 RIYADH 8565 (Iraq, Iran); RIYADH 1053 (Iraq); 2005
RIYADH 8741 (Iran); RIYADH 2840 (reactions to Mubarak); and
2005 RIYADH 8323 (EP governance). 

(APPROVED:  KINCANNON)
GFOELLER

CONFIDENTIAL: OKINAWAN EXCEPTIONALISM: THE CHINA THREAT OR LACK THEREOF

VZCZCXRO4578
PP RUEHCHI RUEHDT RUEHHM RUEHPB
DE RUEHNH #0103/01 1160120
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
P 260120Z APR 06
FM AMCONSUL NAHA
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 0472
INFO RHMFISS/18WG CP KADENA AB JA
RUCNASE/ASEAN MEMBER COLLECTIVE
RUCNARF/ASEAN REGIONAL FORUM COLLECTIVE
RUSFNSG/CDR10THASG TORII STATION JA
RHMFISS/CDR1STBN1STSFGA TORII STATION JA
RHMFISS/CDRUSARPAC FT SHAFTER HI
RHMFISS/CG FIRST MAW
RHMFISS/CG II MEF
RUHBABA/CG III MEF CAMP COURTNEY JA
RHMFISS/CG III MEF
RUHBANB/CG MCB CAMP BUTLER JA
RUHBBEA/CG THIRD FSSG CAMP KINSER JA
RUHBABA/CG THIRD MARDIV CAMP COURTNEY JA
RUHBABA/CG THIRD MARDIV
RUEAIIA/CIA WASHDC
RUEAIIA/CIA WASHINGTON DC
RHMFISS/COMFLEACT OKINAWA JA
RHMFISS/COMMARCORBASESJAPAN CAMP BUTLER JA
RHMFISS/COMMARFORPAC
RHHMHAA/COMPACFLT PEARL HARBOR HI
RHOVVKG/COMSEVENTHFLT
RHHMDBA/COMSUBPAC PEARL HARBOR HI
RHMFISS/COMUSJAPAN YOKOTA AB JA
RUHBVMA/CTF 76
RUYLBAH/DODSPECREP OKINAWA JA
RUEHFK/AMCONSUL FUKUOKA PRIORITY 0137
RHHMUNA/HQ USPACOM HONOLULU HI
RHHJJAA/JICPAC HONOLULU HI
RHHMBRA/JICPAC PEARL HARBOR HI
RUEHNH/AMCONSUL NAHA PRIORITY 0517
RHEHAAA/NATIONAL SECURITY COUNCIL WASHINGTON DC
RHMFISS/NAVCRIMINVSERVFO FAREAST YOKOSUKA JA
RHMFISS/NAVCRIMINVSERVRA OKINAWA JA
RUHBANB/OKINAWA AREA FLD OFC US FORCES JAPAN CAMP BUTLER JA
RUEHOK/AMCONSUL OSAKA KOBE PRIORITY 0209
RUEKJCS/OSD WASHINGTON DC
RUEHKSO/AMCONSUL SAPPORO PRIORITY 0174
RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHINGTON DC
RUEHKO/AMEMBASSY TOKYO PRIORITY 0472
RHMFISS/USARPAC G5 FT SHAFTER HI
RHMFISS/USPACOM REP GUAM ISLAND GU
RUALBCC/YOKOTA AB HQ USFJ
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 08 NAHA 000103 

SIPDIS 

SIPDIS 

E.O. 12958: DECL:  4/26/2031
TAGS: MARR PINS JA CH TW
SUBJECT: OKINAWAN EXCEPTIONALISM: THE CHINA THREAT OR LACK THEREOF 

REF: A. A.  TOKYO 1301
     B. B.  TOKYO 1153
     C. C.  EMBASSY TOKYO TRANSLATION OF FEBRUARY 24 SANKEI SHIMBUN ARTICLE.
     D. D.  FUKUOKA 17
     E. E.  NAGOYA 11
     F. F.  TOKYO 822 

NAHA 00000103  001.2 OF 008 

CLASSIFIED BY: Thomas G. Reich, Consul General, Consulate
General Naha, State.
REASON: 1.4 (d) 

1.     (C) Summary: Despite China's rapidly expanding economic
and military activities, including in waters near Okinawa,
Okinawans claim they do not share America's or Japan's sense of
threat from China.  While many mainland Japanese officials and
influentials say they recognize China as a potential threat to
regional security and stability, even most conservative
Okinawans do not believe a Chinese threat to Japan (or
elsewhere) necessarily means a threat to Okinawa.  Many
Okinawans identify with China culturally and believe China sees
them as a separate people from the Japanese.  Some also say
Okinawa, over the centuries, has received better treatment from
China than from Japan or the United States.  These attitudes
combine to produce an Okinawan perspective that is markedly
different from that of mainland Japan, and which is a factor in
local attitudes toward U.S. military bases in Okinawa.  End
summary. 

------------------
China Rising
------------------ 

2. (SBU) In recent years, China's economic expansion and growing
military capabilities have attracted a great deal of attention
in Japan, although somewhat less in Okinawa.  The two leading
Okinawan newspapers generally appear reluctant to feature
articles about the potential negative impacts on regional
security associated with China's rise, mostly because the
newspapers fear this line of thought will serve as an implicit
justification for the continued existence of U.S. military bases
on the island. 

3. (SBU) Nevertheless, Okinawans who make the effort to read
mainland Japanese newspapers can find ample coverage of Japan's
concerns.  Some widely reported Chinese activities have a very
direct connection to Okinawa.  For example, Japan, China and
Taiwan have competing claims to an island chain 250 miles west
of Okinawa, known as the Senkakus in Japan and Diaoyu in China.
The governments of Japan and China have disputed the islands'
sovereignty for years and more recently have both made moves to
develop undersea resources near them (see, e.g., refs. A, B).
The media have reported China has erected drilling platforms in
the disputed territory. 

4. (SBU) China has also stepped up military air and sea
activities in the area, prompting Japanese Self Defense Forces
to respond.  According to national broadcaster NHK, Japan Air
Self Defense Forces scrambled to intercept Chinese military
aircraft above or near the East China Sea 30 times between April
and September 2005, more than twice as often as they did in all
of 2004.  Chinese maritime activity also occasionally makes the
news.  The November 2004 Chinese submarine incursion into
Japanese waters within Okinawa Prefecture drew a rare Chinese
apology for a ""technical error.""  The mainland Japanese media
have suggested this was not the only Chinese submarine intrusion
near Okinawa. 

--------------------------------------------- --------------
------------------------------
Different Perspectives of ""Mainland"" Japanese and Okinawans
--------------------------------------------- --------------
------------------------------ 

5. (C) In mainland Japan, concern over China's military buildup
is frequently aired.  For example, in January the Liberal
Democratic Party (LDP) General Affairs Chairman Akio Kuma noted
that if China chose to swallow up Taiwan, it would be easy
enough for it to swallow up Okinawa, too, in the absence of U.S.
forces.  In February the opposition Democratic Party of Japan
(DPJ) issued a statement that it was ""inevitable that China's
military buildup and its moves to line up marine interests from
the viewpoint of the Japanese people are recognized as an actual
threat to Japan"" (ref. C). 

6. (U) Typical of many Japanese academics' views was a February
9 article by (Japan's) National Defense University Professor
Tomohide Murai stating that the most efficient way for the
United States to project power throughout the world was to link
with regional partners, and that Japan, by its very location,
was a key partner in the Pacific.  Murai noted the Chinese
recognized the strategic importance of Okinawa, calling it (as
does the United States) the ""keystone of the Pacific."" 

7. (SBU) In Okinawa, however, many - probably most -residents
have a substantially different assessment of China.  In general,
Okinawans perceive little potential threat from China; many
people here note China and the Ryukyu Kingdom had peaceful
relations for centuries prior to the 19th Century Meiji
Restoration in Japan.  To be sure, there are Okinawans who are
as concerned about China's destabilizing possibilities as are
many mainlanders, but this is not the prevailing view on the
island. 

8. (C) As vignettes of Okinawa's relaxed attitude toward China,
we note the following conversations.  During a September 2005
office call, reformist Ginowan City Mayor Yoichi Iha told us he
believed China posed no threat to Okinawa.  In October 2005 Kin
Town Mayor Gibu underscored his support for the U.S.-Japan
alliance but complained the GOJ had never explained what threat,
exactly, the alliance deterred.  In March, former Socialist
Party Diet Member and candidate for Okinawa City mayor Mitsuko
Tomon made the same complaint. 

9.  (C) We asked why a look at a map of the region surrounding
Okinawa and current stories regarding China's expansion didn't
provide Okinawans enough information for them to judge for
themselves.  Tomon replied the GOJ and USG were like the boy who
cried wolf, pointing to China and claiming that something awful
might happen, but nothing ever did.  Okinawans were undisturbed,
Tomon claimed, by Chinese incursions.  Chinese fishing boats
crossing the sea boundary did not affect Okinawan fisheries as
Okinawans worked only in its inner seas.  In a separate
conversation, he Okinawan Federation of Fisheries echoed Tomon's
claim, but added that their members avoided the Senkakus because
they were ""politically difficult.""  The Chinese might be
drilling near the Senkakus, and claim the Senkakus for
themselves, Tomon noted, but these were essentially peaceful
activities for the GOJ to settle.  Because of Okinawa's history
as the Ryukyu Kingdom, it had a very different view of China
than did the Japanese mainland.  Historically speaking, Tomon
commented, Japan and the United States had been more harmful to
Okinawa than China had ever been. 

----------------------------------------
A Ryukyuan History Primer
---------------------------------------- 

10. (U) By entering into close trading relationships with both
China and Japan in the 14th and 15th centuries, the Ryukyu
Kingdom enjoyed a lengthy period of prosperity in the years
before 1609.  As George Kerr notes in his book Okinawa: The
History of an Island People, ""the islands were independent.
They were in constant communication and at peace with
neighboring states.  Okinawans were in the happy position of
freedom to adopt what they wanted, and to remain indifferent -
or at best mildly curious - about foreign artifacts and
institutions for which they felt no pressing need.  China loomed
as the neighbor of unquestioned superiority, and Okinawans were
in close and constant communication with Japan, but were
overwhelmed by neither.""  Many Okinawans today regard this
period as the Golden Age of their history, and view it as a
basis for their belief that China sees Okinawa a place entirely
separate from Japan. 

11. (U) The Golden Age ended in 1609, when the southernmost clan
in mainland Japan (the Satsumas of southern Kyushu) sent an army
to assert control over Okinawa and extracted increasingly
burdensome tributes.  The Satsumas then took over the lucrative
trade with China through Okinawa, continuing it despite the
Tokugawa Shogunate's closed country (sakoku) policy. 

12. (U) After Commodore Perry and his black ships helped trigger
the Meiji Restoration, Japan began vigorously securing and
expanding its borders.  In 1872 Japan formally abolished the
Ryukyu Kingdom and annexed Okinawa, over Chinese protests.
Okinawa pleaded with China and the United States to intervene.
Four-party discussions dragged on for decades until the
Sino-Japanese War of 1894-95, which settled the issue in Japan's
favor as far as the western powers were concerned. 

13. (U) Japan instituted a top-down assimilation program for
Okinawa that gained momentum when met by a bottom-up
assimilation movement following Japan's success in the
Sino-Japanese War.  Practical-minded Okinawans became convinced
they would benefit from closer identification with Japan.  Early
editorials of the Ryukyu Shimpo, dating as far back as 1893,
asserted that Okinawa could develop only by fully assimilating
with Japan. 

14. (U) Over the following 50 years, many Okinawans saw military
service, including during the battle for Okinawa, as a chance to
prove they were true Japanese.  However, the battle, which
killed perhaps a third of the Okinawan population, came as a
shock to most of the survivors, who experienced or heard stories
of atrocities against Okinawans by Japanese troops.  In the
years after the war, a home-grown historical interpretation of
the battle took solid root in Okinawa, which holds that Tokyo
had always intended to sacrifice Okinawa in a battle designed to
consume as many U.S. forces as possible, to stall and weaken an
eventual attack on the mainland. 

15. (U) The United States directly governed Okinawa through a
military high commissioner from 1945 to 1972, 20 years longer
than the rest of Japan.  During this period, U.S. forces
forcibly seized land for bases.  By the early 1960s, a movement
advocating reversion to Japan began among Okinawans, leading to
large-scale demonstrations against the U.S. administration in
the late 1960s and early 1970s.  Okinawa reverted to Japan May
15, 1972. 

16. (SBU) The reunion was a victory for all Okinawans (though
many were dismayed at the remaining numbers of U.S. facilities
and forces), and anti-U.S. protests were dramatically reduced
following reversion.  With reversion, the GOJ sharply increased
infrastructure development, and the general standard of living
greatly improved.  However, in the years since 1972, many
Okinawans have called for lessening the island's economic
dependence on GOJ transfer payments.  Okinawa remains the
poorest prefecture in Japan, with the highest unemployment rate
in Japan, and many argue that Okinawa needs to become more
economically independent. 

--------------------------------------------- --------------
-----------------
Okinawan Analysis: Split Identity, Affinity with China
--------------------------------------------- --------------
----------------- 

17. (SBU) The above history still shapes Okinawans' world views,
including their sense of identity.  In December 2005 the
University of the Ryukyus announced the results of a telephone
survey of Okinawans, in which 40% of respondents, when asked how
they identified themselves, said they were Okinawan.  A smaller
percentage said they were both Okinawan and Japanese (36%), and
just over one in five identified themselves as Japanese (21%). 

18. (SBU) This history also shapes how Okinawans view the GOJ
and actions that are presented in the world press as
provocations to China, most notably visits by the Prime Minister
to Tokyo's Yasukuni Shrine.  While many mainland Japanese are
reportedly uncomfortable with the visits, if push comes to shove
between China and Japan, opinion polls show that most side with
Japan's right to do as it pleases.  We believe most Okinawans
side with China.  Typical of this attitude is Masaru Yamada,
treasurer of Okinawa City, who recently criticized Koizumi's
visits to Yasukuni Shrine. He told us he doubted China would
ever accept Koizumi's explanations of the visits, any more than
he himself did.  Okinawans and Chinese held similar views of the
visits, he explained, because they shared the experience of
having been ""prisoners of war"" of the Japanese. 

19.  (U) Local newspaper editorials have also pointed to the
Yasukuni visits as unnecessary barriers to bilateral and
regional cooperation that the GOJ could, and should, remove.
Although an exaggeration, a recent Ryukyu Shimpo article
reporting on the study of Okinawan identity concluded with a
warning that GOJ policies, particularly as they related to bases
and transformation, could influence Okinawans' opinions on
whether to remain part of Japan. 

20. (SBU) Many Okinawans believe that China sees them
differently, and more warmly, than it sees the rest of Japan.
They point out that Taipei International Airport, when posting
place names in Chinese characters, lists flights to/from
""Ryukyu,"" not Okinawa.  A May 2005 Ryukyu Shimpo report claimed
that, because of Okinawa's history, it could become an
intermediary peacefully linking China and Taiwan.  By offering
an independent, international contribution, Okinawa could
renounce its title of ""(strategic) keystone of the Pacific"" and
become a ""keystone of goodwill.""  A June 2005 Ryukyu Shimpo
opinion piece contrasted the hospitality the Chinese granted
Okinawa Governor Inamine and his party when they visited Beijing
with Beijing's snubbing of PM Koizumi.  ""The extreme attention
provided Okinawa, with its deep historical connection to China,
was conspicuous in its contrast.  To look at it the other way
around, it was an intense dig at the GOJ,"" commented the Shimpo. 

21.  (SBU)  Chinese Ambassador to Japan Ki Ou (phonetic from
Japanese pronunciation) visited Okinawa April 24, on a trip
sponsored by the OPG, Okinawa Economic Association, and Okinawa
Visitors and Convention Bureau.  Ou masterfully played to
Okinawans' sense of exceptionalism and desire for a new golden
era of lucrative Sino-Okinawan relations.  Ou cited the
historical and cultural links between China and the Ryukyus and
said he immediately felt comfortable on this first visit to
Okinawa.  Over the past 25 years China's economic expansion had
far outpaced its military expansion, Ou claimed, and its defense
capabilities were reasonable for a country of China's area and
population.  China alone, of the five original nuclear powers,
had offered to eliminate all nuclear weapons if the others would
only agree to do the same.  Okinawa and China should again
travel together the path of peaceful development, Ou stressed,
and tens of thousands of Chinese tourists annually were sure to
follow. 

-----------
Caveats
----------- 

22. (SBU) Okinawa's exceptionalism is not based entirely on
history and feeling; it is used to practical effect.  Okinawans
claiming to feel no threat from China often use this to bolster
arguments that bases should be eliminated from Okinawa.  For
example, when asked specifically about Chinese military
activities near Okinawa, such as the November 2004 submarine
incursion, former Diet member Tomon grudgingly admitted that the
incident was regrettable.  She hastened to add, however, that it
alone did not justify the concentration of U.S. forces and
facilities in Okinawa. 

23. (SBU) The claim of exceptionalism is useful even for
conservatives who support the alliance and those who profit from
our base presence.  Conservative Okinawans could be seen as
playing good cop to reformists' bad cop, in order to squeeze the
maximum concessions from the GOJ and USG. A number of Okinawan
leaders probably assert this exceptionalism because they believe
it useful in leveraging concessions from the USG and GOJ in
return for Okinawan shouldering the burden of U.S. military
bases. 

24.  (SBU) Economic self-interest also helps explain Okinawa's
keenness to engage China.  In this, Okinawan governments and
businesses have motives similar to those of other provinces now
scrambling to find new sources of income as Koizumi's reforms
reduce the outward flow of GOJ largess.  The former Secretary
General of the LDP in Okinawa, Kenjiro Nishida, told us his main
motivation for founding the Okinawa-China Friendship Exchange
Association was to boost the number of Chinese tourists to
Okinawa.  He noted his Chinese counterparts met him more than
halfway, being well funded by their Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
 ConGen Fukuoka and Consulate Nagoya have identified identical
local motives to engage China, as well as signs of China's
welcoming this engagement (Refs. F, G).  The Chinese leadership
may remember Sun Tzu's maxim, ""when he is united, divide him.""
Regardless of how cool relations are between Tokyo and Beijing,
there is no evidence this has had an effect on Okinawa's ties
with China. 

25. (SBU) That being said, Okinawan businesspeople whose
interests directly conflict with China are not as relaxed about
Chinese expansion.  Local developer Tadashi Zayasu told us he
owned part of an interest in a drilling application in the East
China Sea near the Senkaku Islands.  Zayasu said the GOJ had
approved a drilling application filed by the partnership, d.b.a.
Teikoku Oil.  The application was filed in 1970, but the GOJ did
not approve it until July 2005.  Zayasu mused that the GOJ
seemed bent on helping the Chinese at the expense of Okinawans.
Why else, he asked, would the GOJ have funded a Chinese pipeline
to support their exploitation of the fields while sitting on a
Japanese company's application for over thirty years? 

-------------------------------
Comment/Conclusion
------------------------------- 

26. (SBU) The above caveats notwithstanding, Okinawa's sense of
affinity with China and feeling of distance from Japanese
interests give this place a unique perspective on Sino-Japanese
relations, and it shapes the local environment for U.S. military
bases.  Due in part to this, many Okinawans are unconvinced that
our bases in Okinawa are needed to defend Japan -- or at least
not to defend Okinawa.  Some in the GOJ leadership may value the
domestic political benefits of appealing to Japanese nationalism
over the benefits of improved Sino-Japanese relations (ref. F).
The Yasukuni visits, and Chinese reactions to them, are having
the opposite effect on attitudes in Okinawa.  Such acts
strengthen the sense in Okinawa that the LDP leadership, and the
GOJ more broadly, ignore the victims of militarism.  Okinawans'
cultural identification with China, combined with a sense of
serial betrayal by the GOJ, fuels local suspicion of GOJ motives
on current political-military issues.
REICH

CONFIDENTIAL: CUBA: NUN COMMENTS ON FIDEL’S HEALTH

VZCZCXRO6508
PP RUEHAO RUEHCD RUEHDBU RUEHFL RUEHGA RUEHGD RUEHHA RUEHHO RUEHKW
RUEHLA RUEHMC RUEHNG RUEHNL RUEHQU RUEHRD RUEHRG RUEHRS RUEHSR RUEHTM
RUEHVC
DE RUEHROV #0262 3491610
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
P 151610Z DEC 06
FM AMEMBASSY VATICAN
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 0591
INFO RUEHWH/WESTERN HEMISPHERIC AFFAIRS DIPL POSTS
RUEHZL/EUROPEAN POLITICAL COLLECTIVE
RUEHROV/AMEMBASSY VATICAN 0619
C O N F I D E N T I A L VATICAN 000262 

SIPDIS 

SIPDIS 

E.O. 12958: DECL:  12/15/2016
TAGS: PREL CU VT
SUBJECT: CUBA:  NUN COMMENTS ON FIDEL'S HEALTH 

REF: 04 Vatican 1401 

CLASSIFIED BY: Christopher Sandrolini, Deputy Chief of Mission,
EXEC, State.
REASON: 1.4 (d) 

1. (C) Summary.  A prominent abbess in Rome described her recent
visit to Havana and commented on the state of Castro's health in
a December 12 meeting with Ambassador; she also suggested some
possible contacts for the USG.  The abbess has been
controversial in the past.  End summary. 

2. (C) Ambassador Rooney called on Mother Tekla Famiglietti,
Abbess General of the Brigittine Order of the Most Holy Savior,
on December 12.  Mother Tekla -- in charge of the Brigittines
for some 25 years and sometimes called ""the most powerful woman
in Rome"" -- had just returned from a visit to Cuba.  She had
hoped to meet Fidel Castro, whom she had befriended some years
earlier (reftel) at the inauguration of Mexican President
Vicente Fox. 

3. (C)  Mother Tekla said that during this trip she found a
different attitude among priests, nuns, and government contacts;
there is a feeling of impending change resulting from the coming
end of the Fidel era.  People want change, though some of those
close to Fidel are threatened by it.  Mother Tekla commented
that Cubans would be less agitated in Cuba itself than in Miami
when the changes begin.  She hoped the USG would not wait for
Castro's death to begin opening up, but would instead act now to
relax the embargo and help people; this would also steal a march
on others, such as China, who are already on the ground. 

4. (C) Mother Tekla said she had been to Fidel's house many
times before, typically meeting first with his private secretary
Carlos Valenciaga Diaz.  She had intended to do so this time,
but then felt that Castro was now too weak and ill.  Diaz told
her that Fidel has lost 20 kilos and is a shadow of his former
self; he does not have cancer but is bleeding from the stomach.
A room in Castro's house has been converted into a hospital room. 

5. (C) Mother Tekla said she works with Licencia Caridad, head
of the ministry for religious affairs, and Eusebio Leal Spencer,
whom Castro put in charge of getting a new facility built for
Mother Tekla.  She thinks Spencer may know some people who might
be of interest to the USG as potential leaders once a government
change has occurred. 

Comment
-------------- 

6. (C)   Mother Tekla is well known in Rome (if sometimes
controversial), and we have reported on meeting her in the past.
 Reftel describes a flap over her 2004 visit to Havana with
Cardinal Sepe for the opening of the Brigittines' house there,
which Castro used as a propaganda opportunity to the
embarrassment of the Holy See.  We report this conversation for
its possible interest in terms of news about Fidel's health, and
the suggested contacts. 

ROONEY

CONFIDENTIAL: COURT ACQUITS NAJIB’S EX-ADVISOR IN MURDER TRIAL

VZCZCXRO9992
PP RUEHCHI RUEHDT RUEHHM RUEHNH
DE RUEHKL #0959/01 3051103
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
P 311103Z OCT 08
FM AMEMBASSY KUALA LUMPUR
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 1839
INFO RUCNASE/ASEAN MEMBER COLLECTIVE PRIORITY
RUEHBY/AMEMBASSY CANBERRA PRIORITY 2672
RUEHLO/AMEMBASSY LONDON PRIORITY 0510
RUEHUM/AMEMBASSY ULAANBAATAR PRIORITY 0082
RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHDC PRIORITY
RHHMUNA/CDR USPACOM HONOLULU HI PRIORITY
RHEHNSC/NSC WASHDC PRIORITY
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 KUALA LUMPUR 000959 

SIPDIS 

FOR EAP/MTS 

E.O. 12958: DECL: 10/31/2028
TAGS: PGOV PHUM KJUS KDEM MY
SUBJECT: COURT ACQUITS NAJIB'S EX-ADVISOR IN MURDER TRIAL 

Classified By: Political Counselor Mark D. Clark for reasons 1.4 (b and
 d). 

Summary and Comment
-------------------
1.  (SBU) High Court Justice Mohamad Zaki on October 31
acquitted Political Analyst Abdul Razak Baginda, former
advisor to Deputy Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak, of the
charge of abetting the murder of Mongolian national Altantuya
Shaariibuu in October 2006, but ordered the continuation of
the murder trial for two policemen.  Defense lawyers
announced they sought to call to the stand two men who have
linked DPM Najib to the case:  Razak's former private
investigator Balasubramaniam, who has disappeared from
public, and controversial blogger Raja Petra who is detained
under the Internal Security Act.  The trial of the two police
defendants is set to continue November 10.  In immediate
commentary, political opposition leaders, including Anwar
Ibrahim, did not focus on Razak's guilt or innocence, but
called into question the conduct of the proceedings and
suggested a cover-up to protect DPM Najib. 

2.  (C) Comment:  Many observers anticipated Razak's
acquittal given the prosecution's poor performance, Razak's
connections to DPM Najib, and the alleged and
widely-perceived political manipulation in the case.  The
Razak verdict momentarily attracts more attention to the
allegations of Najib's linkages to the case; so too would the
testimony of either Balasubramaniam or Raja Petra, though it
is not clear either man will be able to take the stand.
Allegations stemming from the Altantuya case, however, have
not prevented Najib from securing all the nominations so far
for the UMNO party elections.  Absent dramatic and compelling
new evidence prejudicial to the DPM, the Altantuya case will
not slow down Najib's drive to become Malaysia's next Prime
Minister.  End Summary and Comment. 

Razak Acquitted, Trial for Policemen Continues
--------------------------------------------- -
3.  (U) High Court Justice Mohamad Zaki on October 31
acquitted Political Analyst Abdul Razak Baginda, former
advisor to Deputy Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak, of charges
of abetting the murder of Mongolian national Altantuya
Shaariibuu in October 2006, but ordered the continuation of
the murder trial for two policemen.  Embassy FSN Political
Assistant attended the judgment hearing.  The ruling came
roughly two years after Razak's arrest, and followed a
lengthy 17-month trial involving the presentation of 84
witnesses.  The prosecution had argued that Razak had asked
the policemen to murder Altantuya, Razak's former lover who
had harassed Razak for money.  The judge ruled that the
prosecution team failed to prove a prima facie case against
Razak, and ordered his release.  The judge found a
sufficiently strong prosecution case against the two police
defendants, Chief Inspector Azilah Hadri and Corporal Sirul
Azha Umar, charged with carrying out Altantuya's murder.  At
the time of the crime, Azilah and Azha were members of the
protection detail for DPM Najib. 

Defense to Call Controversial Witnesses
--------------------------------------- 

4.  (U) The Justice requested the defense to begin their
arguments later on the afternoon of October 31, but the
defense requested and was granted a continuance as their
witnesses were not available.  In the day's most surprising
turn, Kamarul Hisham, lead defense counsel for one of the
accused police officers, stated he wished to place on the
witness chair Razak's private investigator P. Balasubramaniam
and Malaysia Today editor Raja Petra Kamaruddin.  Both
witnesses have previously made sworn statements linking DPM
Najib to the murdered Altantuya, and in the case of Raja
Petra, implicating Najib's wife in the murder.
Balasubramaniam, who was an early witness for the
prosecution, has not been seen publicly since he issued a
sworn statement in July on DPM Najib's links to the Altantuya
case, and then retracted the statement the next day,
allegedly under duress according to some accounts.  Raja
Petra is currently detained under the Internal Security Act
(ISA).  (Note: Although the court may order Raja Petra's
presence as a witness, Section 18 of the ISA gives the Home
Minister discretion to ignore the court order.  End note.)
The Judge set November 10 for the defense to begin its
presentation. 

5.  (SBU) For the October 31 judgment hearing, a crowd of
approximately 200 waited outside the courthouse while some
100 (primarily family members of the defendants and
journalists) filled the packed courtroom.  Razak's family
appeared confident and remained calm throughout the whole
hearing and showed no sign of surprise in Razak's acquittal.
The verdict also appeared to come as no surprise to the
attending crowd.  The victim's father, Setev Shaariibuu,
attended the judgment and afterward through an interpreter
expressed his disappointment to reporters:  "I am not
satisfied.  My daughter (knew) only one Malaysian and that is
Razak Baginda.  Now my daughter is dead and Baginda is freed.
 The country (Malaysia) has lost credibility..." 

Opposition Suggests Cover-Up
----------------------------
6.  (U) In immediate comments, political opposition figures,
who have suggested repeatedly that the government had engaged
in a cover-up to protect DPM Najib, did not focus on Razak's
guilt or innocence, but called into question the conduct of
the proceedings.  Opposition leader Anwar Ibrahim noted, "On
a personal level, I wish Razak Baginda well, but the issue
here resolves around the court procedure and investigations.
There is a general and growing perception that the
investigation was not done professionally, that there is a
clear motive to cover up."  Anwar also drew attention to
recent Internet revelations of an SMS exchange between Najib
and Razak Baginda's former lawyer in which Najib reportedly
wrote that Razak "will face a tentative charge but all is not
lost." 

KEITH

AMBASSADOR ADVOCATES FOR BOEING AND CBP WITH AER

VZCZCXRO4216
RR RUEHAG RUEHDF RUEHIK RUEHLZ
DE RUEHDL #0493/01 1241516
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 041516Z MAY 06
FM AMEMBASSY DUBLIN
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 6872
INFO RUCNMEM/EU MEMBER STATES
RUEHBL/AMCONSUL BELFAST 0373
RUCPDOC/USDOC WASHDC
RHEFHLC/DEPT OF HOMELAND SECURITY WASHINGTON DC
RUEHBS/USEU BRUSSELS
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 DUBLIN 000493 

SIPDIS 

SIPDIS 

COMMERCE FOR ITA/MAC/ROBERT MCLAUGHLIN
COMMERCE FOR ITA/MAC/ADVOCACY CENTER OR PAT NUGENT
DHS FOR CBP/JENNIFER SAVA 

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: EAIR ECON ETRD EI
SUBJECT: AMBASSADOR ADVOCATES FOR BOEING AND CBP WITH AER
LINGUS CEO 

REF: DUBLIN 361 AND PREVIOUS 

DUBLIN 00000493  001.2 OF 002 

1.  Summary: In a May 2 meeting with Aer Lingus CEO Dermot
Mannion, the Ambassador advocated Boeing aircraft for the
carrier's long-haul needs and sought Mannion's help in
pushing the Dublin Airport Authority (DAA) to upgrade U.S.
Customs and Border Protection (CBP) operations in Ireland.
Mannion said that the Boeing offer was attractive, and he
noted that Aer Lingus would decide between Boeing and Airbus
at roughly the same time as the carrier's likely stock
flotation in September.  He also observed that Aer Lingus
could enjoy the full benefits of trans-Atlantic Open Skies
only if Dublin's new terminal were sized to accommodate
rising passenger volume and to enable CBP to conduct full
pre-clearance (adding agricultural and customs checks to
passport screening.)  Mannion added that Aer Lingus needed
clarity on the prospects for the U.S.-EU aviation agreement,
including the phase-out of the Shannon Stop requirement, in
order to start planning for the 2007-2008 winter travel
season.  Post will continue efforts to press the case for
both Boeing and CBP in our regular discussions with industry,
the Irish parliament, and the GOI.  End summary. 

Advocacy for Boeing
------------------- 

2.  In a May 2 meeting with Aer Lingus CEO Dermot Mannion,
the Ambassador strongly advocated Boeing's 787 Dreamliner for
the carrier's long-haul needs.  Mannion replied that Aer
Lingus would probably decide between Boeing and Airbus at
roughly the same time as the carrier's stock flotation,
expected in September.  He added, however, that aircraft
orders might also have to await the Dublin Airport
Authority's decision on the size of Dublin's planned second
terminal, which would determine the number of gates available
to Aer Lingus planes (see para 4).  He noted that "the door
remains very open to Boeing," and he observed that Aer Lingus
would take advantage of Ex-Im Bank financing options if
Boeing were to win the aircraft bid.  Mannion also recounted
his efforts to quash press reports that Airbus had secured
Aer Lingus' long-haul aircraft orders, following on the
carrier's deal to acquire four Airbus A-330s in 2006-2007 for
intra-European service.  Noting recent reports on the Airbus
A-350's design flaws, the Ambassador stressed Post's
intention to continue advocacy for Boeing.  Mannion
recommended that emboffs speak with members of the airline's
newly formed aircraft purchases evaluation team. 

Needed Clarity on U.S.-EU Open Skies
------------------------------------ 

3.  Aer Lingus needs clarity on prospects for the U.S.-EU
aviation agreement, including the U.S.-Ireland annex, to plan
future trans-Atlantic service, said Mannion.  He explained
that Aer Lingus sold seats 300 days in advance and was
already preparing its tentative schedule for the 2007 summer
season.  A delay until October 2006 in the signing of the
U.S.-EU agreement would only give Aer Lingus enough time to
plan for the 2007-2008 winter season.  Mannion expected,
however, that Aer Lingus would launch service to San
Francisco in 2007 as the first of the three additional U.S.
points that Aer Lingus would be permitted to serve under the
U.S.-Ireland annex to the U.S.-EU agreement.  He also
remarked that, due to the uncertain timing of the U.S.-EU
agreement, the Irish Department of Transport intended to
re-engage with USG negotiators on the U.S.-Ireland annex
during U.S.-EU aviation discussions the week of May 8.
(Under the annex, October 29, 2006, is the start date for the
phase-out of the current "Shannon Stop" requirement, by which
U.S. and Irish carriers may operate one non-stop flight
to/from Dublin for each non-stop flight to/from Shannon.) 

Right-sizing Dublin Airport for Aer Lingus and CBP
--------------------------------------------- ----- 

4.  With the April 5 Irish Cabinet decision to privatize Aer
Lingus through a stock flotation, the carrier's next goal was
to ensure that Dublin Airport's planned second terminal would
meet the carrier's needs, observed Mannion.  He noted that
the Dublin Airport Authority (DAA) had aimed to submit the
planning application for the new terminal this month, a
target that now would not be met.  Mannion cautioned that
further delay with the planning application would seriously
jeopardize the terminal's scheduled opening in 2009.  On the 

DUBLIN 00000493  002.2 OF 002 

upside, the delay had allowed Aer Lingus more time to consult
with the DAA on the terminal size required to accommodate the
carrier's rising passenger volume projections.  The
Ambassador cited an April 28 Irish Times report that Aer
Lingus and Ryanair had convinced the DAA on the need to
expand the planned terminal, at a possible extra cost of euro
100 million.  Mannion responded that whereas Aer Lingus had
had regular contact with working-level DAA officials on the
terminal, the DAA Board of Directors had refused to consider
expansion until this past week. 

5.  Aer Lingus could enjoy the full benefits of
trans-Atlantic Open Skies only if the new terminal were also
configured to enable U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP)
to conduct full pre-clearance, adding agricultural and
customs checks to passport screening, remarked Mannion.  The
Ambassador said that he was focused not only on the DAA's
plans to accommodate CBP in the new terminal, but also on
dealing with mounting passenger congestion in CBP's current
facilities over the next two summers, especially with the
likely onset of bilateral Open Skies.  Mannion pointed out
that a delay in the terminal's opening till 2010 would
exacerbate pressures on CBP staff.  He added that CBP would
be key to Aer Lingus' plans to link its new Dublin-Dubai
service with established Dublin-U.S. flights in 2007, since
Middle Eastern passengers would prefer to be pre-cleared
outside the United States.  Mannion and the Ambassador agreed
to continue coordinated approaches to the DAA on CBP's needs,
with emboffs noting the possibility of moving sooner to full
pre-clearance in the more spacious Shannon Airport. 

Comment: Pressing the cases for Boeing and CBP
--------------------------------------------- - 

6.  This was the Ambassador's third meeting with Mannion
since he assumed his Aer Lingus post last summer, and in each
discussion the Ambassador has urged Aer Lingus to choose
Boeing and to choose quickly, with orders for the 787
Dreamliner now backed up to roughly 2011.  In previous
discussions, Mannion noted difficulties in placing orders
during ongoing negotiations with labor about the stock
flotation, lest he create doubts about his commitment to
reduce the carrier's reported euro 340 million pension
deficit with the flotation proceeds.  The Irish Cabinet's
April 5 decision to proceed with the stock flotation has lent
certainty to Aer Lingus' ability to raise equity for the
aircraft orders.  We are concerned, however, that the Dublin
Airport sizing issue might become another reason for delay in
Aer Lingus' aircraft purchase decisions. 

7.  Post will continue to press the case for upgrading CBP
operations at Dublin and Shannon Airports.  In a recent
dinner with Irish Parliament's Foreign Affairs Committee, the
Ambassador described the potential advantages of full
pre-clearance for Dublin as a trans-Atlantic hub, leading one
committee member to raise the issue in Parliament the next
day.  Shannon Airport has also hired a U.S. consultant to do
a feasibility study on Shannon's ability to move to full
pre-clearance.  We look forward to receiving from CBP
headquarters an updated standards document that outlines for
airports the logistical requirements for CBP to provide full
pre-clearance.
BENTON

CIA Archive: NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE DAILY

DOC_0001426537

TOP-SECRET: THE BREAKING OF “GEHEIMSCHREIBER”

The_Breaking_of_Geheimschreiber

TOP-SECRET FROM THE ARCHIVES OF THE NSA: American Cryptology during the Cold War; 1945-1989

cold_war_iv

CONFIDENTIAL: OECD: REPORT OF MEETING

C O N F I D E N T I A L PARIS 003181 

SIPDIS 

STATE FOR EB/IFD/OMA, EUR/ERA, INL/C, L/LEI AND L/EB
DOC FOR ITA/MAC/MTA/KOZLOWICKI, OGC/NICKERSON/MANSEAU
DOJ FOR CRIMINAL DIVISION/FRAUD SECTION/MMENDELSOHN/JACOBSON
USEU FOR MRICHARDS
PASS TO US SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISION/ENFORCEMENT/RGRIME,
INTL.AFFAIRS/TBEATTY 

FROM USOECD 

SIPDIS 

E.O. 12958: DECL: 07/25/2012
TAGS: KCOR ECON EINV ETRD PREL OECD
SUBJECT: OECD: REPORT OF MARCH 12-14, 2007 MEETING OF THE
WORKING GROUP ON BRIBERY 

Classified By: A/DCM CURTIS STONE FOR REASONS 1.5 (B AND D) 

1. (SBU) SUMMARY:  At its March 12-14 meeting, the OECD Working
Group on Bribery (WGB) conducted Phase 2 peer-review evaluations
of Portugal and Ireland's implementation of the OECD
Anti-Bribery Convention ("Convention").  The WGB called on
Portugal to raise awareness of foreign bribery in both the
public and private sector, to be more proactive in detecting,
investigating and prosecuting foreign bribery offenses, and to
take measures to disallow undocumented, confidential expenses.
Lead examiners advised that the GOI's poor participation in the
original on-site visit left them with little basis to assess
Ireland's implementation and enforcement efforts.  Ireland
acknowledged this problem and agreed to an additional on-site
visit within one year.  The WGB assessed UK efforts to implement
the Convention in context of a Phase 2 written follow-up review,
continued discussions on the UK's discontinuation of the
BAE/Saudi Arabia investigation, and released a public statement
expressing serious concerns.  The WGB also announced its
decision to conduct a supplemental, Phase 2 bis examination of
the UK.  Japan reported on results of its self-assessment of
obstacles to effective enforcement.  The WGB completed Phase 2
follow-up reviews of Japan and Switzerland and established
mandates for two sub-groups to review anti-bribery instruments
as part of the possible revision of the 1997 Revised
Recommendation, which outlined best practices in areas such as
accounting, auditing and public procurement, non-tax
deductibility of bribes and other measures to combat foreign
bribery.  END SUMMARY. 

TABLE OF CONTENTS 

Portugal Phase 2 Evaluation - paras 2-3
Ireland Phase 2 Evaluation - paras 4-6
Japan Self-Assessment - paras 7-10
Phase 2 Follow-up Reports - para 11
-- Japan Written Follow-up - paras 12-13
-- UK Written Follow-up - paras 14-19
-- UK:  BAE/Saudi Arabia - paras 20-24
-- Switzerland Written Follow-up - paras 25-26
-- Revision of Anti-Bribery Instruments- para 27
-- Deferral of Tour de Table - para 28
-- Outreach Activities - para 29
-- 2006 Annual Report- para 30
-- Other Items - paras 31-34 

PORTUGAL PHASE 2 EXAMINATION 

2. (U) Lead examiners Brazil and the Netherlands briefed on
results of the Phase 2 on-site visit to Portugal, identifying
key deficiencies in Portuguese enforcement efforts.  Although
Portugal had made significant legislative efforts to implement
the Convention, it has had no foreign bribery prosecutions or
serious investigations.  While many government actors are
involved in anti-corruption efforts, they are not active.  More
vigorous action by the private sector is also required.  The
Portugal delegation reported that the on-visit had made a very
positive contribution to Portugal's revision of its criminal
code.  Since the visit, the Foreign Ministry, Ministry of
Economy and the Export Promotion Agency had carried out a major
dissemination campaign to inform all Portuguese missions abroad,
major business associations and the largest Portuguese companies
about foreign bribery obligations. 

3. (U) WGB members called on Portugal to take measures to
disallow undocumented, confidential expenses; establish an
autonomous definition of foreign public officials; clarify
reporting obligations and procedures within the public service
and accounting and auditing professions; provide additional
resources and training to law enforcement authorities to
proactively detect, investigate and prosecute foreign bribery;
E 

raise awareness among public officials on preventing, detecting,
reporting and investigating foreign bribery, including raising
awareness among law enforcement authorities about special rules
to establish nationality and extra-territorial jurisdiction in
foreign bribery cases, specifically the absence of a dual
criminality requirement; and to work more closely with the
private sector and civil society to raise awareness and to
develop effective prevention strategies. 

IRELAND PHASE 2 EXAMINATION 

4. (SBU) Lead examiners New Zealand and Estonia reported on a
wholly unsatisfactory on-site visit to Ireland in October.
Inadequate preparation and participation by the GOI left them
with little basis to assess Ireland's implementation and
enforcement efforts.  They advised that the total absence of
awareness raising activities on foreign bribery in Ireland had
demonstrated the low priority given to Ireland's application of
the Convention.  There have been no prosecutions of foreign
bribery in Ireland.  No law required public officials to report
foreign bribery allegations, no whistle-blowing legislation was
in place for the private sector, and overlapping statutes
prohibiting foreign bribery contained differing elements which
could impede enforcement efforts. 

5. (U) Lead examiners reported that since the visit, Ireland had
recognized the serious problems with the evaluation and
demonstrated that it intended to give higher priority to
implementing the Convention.  Senior Irish officials announced
that a Prevention of Corruption (Amendment) bill had been
approved by the government, which intended to move quickly to
introduce it to Parliament.  The Irish delegation advised that
the bill will broaden the definitions for bribery and foreign
public officials and introduce extraterritorial jurisdiction.
They also reported that Ireland would consider including
whistle-blower protection in the new bill.  The Irish del said
the peer-review examination had been valuable and Ireland wanted
to adopt best anti-bribery practices.  A group of senior Irish
officials would be convened to review and implement WGB
recommendations. 

6. (U) The WGB concluded that Ireland had not fully met its
Phase 2 monitoring obligations, but accepted Ireland's
invitation to carry out a Phase 2 bis examination with another
on-site visit within one year.  The WGB recommended that Ireland
strengthen its foreign bribery legislation; consolidate or
harmonize the foreign bribery offense under the two overlapping
statutes to remove inconsistencies; expand corporate liability
for foreign bribery; clarify the scope of the relevant
legislation for companies; amend its laws to confirm that bribe
payments are not tax deductible; and ensure that Irish citizens
and corporations can always be effectively prosecuted for
foreign bribery offenses committed outside Ireland by promptly
establishing nationality jurisdiction under the Prevention of
Corruption (Amendment) Act 2001. 

JAPAN SELF-ASSESSMENT 

7. (SBU) The Chairman noted that the main difficulty with
Japan's Phase 2 examination was whether the system was geared to
generate cases and whether one could effectively initiate an
investigation.  Japan conducted a self-assessment to determine
legal and procedural impediments to the effective investigation
and prosecution of foreign bribery.  Japan had established an
inter-agency task force, which met 12 times, and held
consultations with experts, prosecutors and police.  The GOJ
concluded the greatest obstacles were inadequate investigative
leads, the lack of reliable whistle-blowing information,
insufficient responses from Mutual Legal Assistance (MLA)
requests, limited information on investigative methods used by
other countries and insufficient foreign language abilities. 

The Japanese del noted authorities needed to disseminate
information about the foreign bribery offense more widely, more
fully grasp the state of internal auditing and internal control
systems, and raise awareness regarding the Japanese
whistle-blower law that went into effect in June 2005. 

8. (SBU) The Japanese delegation committed to raise awareness of
whistle-blower protection, utilize MLA requests early and
actively, conclude bilateral MLA agreements, actively use
voluntary investigative measures at the earliest possible stage
and exchange information among police, prosecutors, experts and
civil society.  The Japanese del suggested greater focus on the
prevention of foreign bribery is appropriate, commenting that
cases and convictions were not the only criteria of success.
The Japanese del noted that a potential foreign bribery case
involving Japanese firm Kyudenko's activities in the Philippines
was under investigation. 

9. (SBU) Lead examiners United States and Italy applauded Japan
for completing the self-assessment.  The US noted that Japan's
passive approach to investigation and emphasis on maintaining
secrecy at the sacrifice of advancing cases needed to be
addressed.  Not only did the placement of the foreign bribery
offense in the Unfair Competition Prevention Law (UCPL) rather
than in the Criminal Code appear to reduce awareness, but the
entities responsible for pursuing investigations (Ministry of
Economy, Trade and Industry (METI) and Ministry of Justice
(MOJ)) provided conflicting guidance.  The U.S. also highlighted
that the whistle-blower law did not apply to employees of
Japanese companies based overseas.  The principal recommendation
of lead examiners was on-going consultation and monitoring of
Japan's enforcement efforts.  The Italian lead examiner echoed
US comments, and urged Japan to bring a case and build
experience in how to start prosecutions.  He also noted that the
GOJ had shared no information about the Kyudenko case until
reports had appeared in the press. 

10. (SBU) The Japanese del responded that the GOJ has been
proactive in ordering Japanese representations abroad to report
foreign bribery allegations, that prosecutors are trying to
identify evidence and have added enhanced MLA efforts, and
defended the Japanese emphasis on secrecy to avoid destruction
of evidence by suspects.  In the 6 months since the
whistle-blowing law had been enacted, 2,000 reports had been
made, but the Japanese del conceded it needed to raise awareness
about the protection offered.  The Chairman commented that the
key issue appeared to be how Japan can develop an allegation
into a filed case. 

PHASE 2 FOLLOW-UP REPORTS 

11. (U) Within one year of the WGB's approval of the Report of
Phase 2 Examination, countries must, at a minimum, provide an
oral report on steps they have taken or plan to take to
implement the WGB's priority recommendations.  A detailed
written follow-up report must be provided within two years. 

JAPAN WRITTEN FOLLOW-UP 

12. (SBU) Lead examiners U.S. and Italy reported that Japan had
complied with many Phase 2 recommendations.  Japan reported it
had reformed the UCPL to extend statutes of limitation,
requested MLA on two occasions, raised awareness of foreign
bribery, including of amendments to the corporate tax law and
income tax law expressly denying tax deductibility of bribes to
foreign public officials, and distributed amended 2007
Guidelines to prevent foreign bribery.  The WGB found that Japan
had not implemented: 

- Rec. 1(iv) to raise awareness of foreign bribery among the
legal profession; and 

- Rec. 5(c) to clarify that UCPL prohibits all cases where a
foreign public official directs transmission of benefit to a
third party. 

The WGB found that Japan had partially implemented a number of
recommendations, including: 

- recommendation in preamble to Phase 2 recommendations re:
assessing impediments to effective investigation and
prosecution, make use of MLA at non-"filed" investigative stage,
increase law enforcement coordination and address difficulties
encountered in establishing and enforcing territorial
jurisdiction; 

- Rec. 2(b) for METI to establish a formal system to effectively
process allegations of foreign bribery 

- Rec. 2(d) on improving whistle-blower protection for those
reporting directly to law enforcement authorities; 

- Rec. 3(a) to ensure all activities under article 8.1 of the
Convention are prohibited, including off-the-books accounts. 

 - Rec. 5(b) to ensure METI guidelines on facilitation payments
conform to the Convention and Commentaries. 

The WGB found that Japan had satisfactorily implemented other
specific recommendations, but some follow-up recommendations had
not been the subject of sufficient practice and required
continued follow-up. 

13. (SBU) The WGB agreed that, in order to continue moving this
positive process forward, Japan should provide a Phase 2 bis
follow-up report in one year.  This will allow Japan and lead
examiners to consult and exchange views on progress being made
and for a brief report to the WGB.  The WGB agreed that both the
written follow-up and the self-assessment would be published,
along with a summary of the discussion. 

U.K. WRITTEN FOLLOW-UP 

14. (SBU) The WGB found that the UK had implemented a number of
the WGB Phase 2 recommendations, but failed to enact
comprehensive foreign bribery legislation.  The U.K. had no
foreign bribery prosecutions and its decision to drop the BAE
Systems plc investigation relating to Saudi Arabia highlighted
WGB concerns.  The WGB found that the UK had made progress since
its March 2005 Phase 2 examination in raising awareness (e.g.
appointment of a UK anti-corruption coordinator); in continuing
to encourage Overseas Territories to adopt anti-bribery
legislation (UK verified compliance of Guernsey's legislation
with the Convention and Jersey's enactment of a foreign bribery
statute, but not yet extended the Convention to either island);
in providing additional resources to facilitate MLA and in
increasing capacity to investigate allegations of foreign
bribery (e.g. new Metropolitan Police/City of London Police unit
investigating foreign corruption allegations).  Since March
2005, the Serious Fraud Office (SFO) had launched 6 new
investigations and had worked on 23 vetting files in an attempt
to develop enough information to open a case file.  The UK del
expressed its optimism that its first foreign bribery
prosecution could be launched in 2007. 

15. (C) The UK del claimed its existing law implemented the
obligations of the Convention, but noted the UK remains
committed to fundamental reform of its bribery laws.  A Home
Office consultation report had concluded that no consensus
existed for moving forward a draft 2003 bill to enact
comprehensive corruption legislation.  The issue has been
referred to the Law Commission, which was expected to prepare a 

new draft bill within 18 months.  WGB lead examiners France and
Canada underscored that 6 years had passed since the Phase 1
examination recommended the UK enact comprehensive foreign
bribery legislation.  France noted this delay sent a negative
message regarding the UK's commitment to implement the
Convention as a whole. 

16. (C) US del said the UK position that current legislation is
adequate to effectively implement the Convention was rebutted by
concrete evidence that it was not.  US del also noted that the
WGB should ask the UK to do what it had asked Japan to do:
identify the structural problems that have prevented cases from
moving to indictment.  The Chairman commented that the WGB had
long been doubtful regarding the UK's reliance on its
principal-agent element of bribery.  The UK del noted that
evidentiary problems raised by some UK officials regarding the
BAE/Saudi investigation gave a distorted view of the
deficiencies of UK law, calling the Saudi case "wholly unusual,
if not exceptional" given the involvement of an absolute
monarchy. 

17. (U) The WGB found that the UK had failed to implement: 

- the recommendation in the preamble to the Phase 2 to enact at
the earliest possible date comprehensive foreign bribery
legislation; 

- Rec. 3(a) to proceed with adoption of reforms clarifying and
unifying UK accounting legislation with IAS to ensure fraudulent
accounting offense is in full conformity with Article 8 of the
Convention; 

- Rec. 5(a) to amend where appropriate the Code for Crown
Prosecutors, the Crown Prosecution Manual and other documents to
ensure investigation and prosecution of foreign bribery is not
influenced by considerations of national economic interest, the
potential effect upon relations with another state or the
identity of the natural or legal persons involved (Article 5 of
Convention); and 

- Rec. 5(c) to broaden the level of persons engaging the
criminal liability of legal persons for foreign bribery. 

The WGB also concluded that the UK had partially implemented 9
recommendations and satisfactorily implemented 8
recommendations. 

18. (U) Following a further discussion of the BAE/Saudi
investigation (see below), the WGB agreed that it would conduct
a Phase 2 bis review of the UK focused on progress in enacting a
new foreign bribery law and in broadening liability of legal
persons for foreign bribery, examining whether systemic problems
explain the lack of foreign bribery cases brought to prosecution
and addressing other issues raised by the discontinuance of the
BAE/Saudi Arabia investigation.  The review will include an
on-site visit to be conducted by March 2008. 

19. (C) An extensive discussion of how the WGB would make public
this decision followed.  The UK stridently objected to any
engagement with the media by the Chair regarding the review and
asked that only a WGB press release be issued.  The Secretariat
argued that OECD practice is to be as open as possible with the
media, while respecting the confidential nature of the
discussions.  After many delegations expressed confidence in the
Chair, the WGB agreed to allow the Chair to brief the press,
accompanied by OECD Legal staff and the director of the
Financial and Enterprise Affairs Directorate.  Bilateral
interview requests made in the following several days would be
referred to the Secretariat. 

TERMINATION OF BAE/SAUDI ARABIA INVESTIGATION 

20. (C) Lead examiner France noted a number of issues were still
outstanding regarding the BAE/Saudi Arabia investigation,
including the materiality of the UK's national security
rationale.  Lead examiner Canada said it accepted the
explanations given by the UK for reasons for discontinuing the
investigation, but had serious concerns about the UK's legal
framework and adequacy of its corporate criminal liability
legislation.  US del asked whether the UK could provide any
assurances that BAE was not continuing to make corrupt payments
to Saudi officials and that MOD officials were not continuing to
participate in the alleged corrupt payments.  The U.S. also
asked about evidence preservation and whether UK national
security concerns would pose an impediment to providing MLA to
other states. 

21. (C) The UK del, which included Foreign and Commonwealth
Office, SFO, Ministry of Defense Police, Department for
International Development, Metropolitan Police and office of the
Attorney General (AG) officials, reported that the SFO was
reviewing the aftermath of the decision to discontinue in light
of its duty to ensure that the MOD Police, Export Credit
Guarantee Department (ECGD) and other bodies received all
relevant information to help them carry out their public duties.
 The UK del advised that since no one has been charged and found
guilty, there are limitations on actions the UK government can
take and other fora must accept their responsibilities in
considering the case.  The UK del advised that no evidentiary
material would be returned until the judicial review has run its
course.  The SFO did not see a reason why national or
international security would prevent the UK from responding to a
request for MLA. 

22. (C) The Chairman inquired further into the reasons for
discontinuance and asked whether the WGB should not deplore a
threat by a sovereign state to stop fundamental cooperation, if
Saudi threats to stop counter-terrorism cooperation were the
basis of the national security interests involved.  He inquired
about how precise Parties must be in identifying risks and the
immediacy of danger posed before invoking national security.
The UK del advised that the SFO Director had considered only
national and international security grounds in reaching his
decision to discontinue the investigation.  The judicial review
would address whether the decision-making process was valid and
whether the decision was in conformity with Article 5 of the
Convention.  The Swiss del noted that it continued to be very
concerned about the effect of the UK decision, that it implied
that the UK would not prosecute allegations of foreign bribery
by its firms in Saudi Arabia, depriving other parties of a level
playing field there and possibly in other countries. 

23. (C) In response to an OECD legal advisor's inquiries whether
the UK recognized international public policy and public
interest factors in favor of prosecution, the UK del (AG rep)
confirmed that the UK recognized that bribery was contrary to
international public policy and that the nature of bribery as an
offense was a powerful factor for prosecuting the act.  In the
BAE/Saudi matter, however, he advised that the SFO Director had
considered protecting national security an even more important
factor.  The UK AG shared this view, and also considered that
the case was unlikely to lead to successful prosecution.
Regarding the basis for identifying the national security risk,
the UK del said the UK ambassador to Saudi Arabia had considered
the risk that Saudi Arabia would withdraw counter-terrorism
cooperation to be real and that all who expressed views had
shared that assessment, including the UK's security services.
In response to an OECD legal advisor's query about whether the
ECGD had the right to refuse to provide official support to BAE
Systems in the future in light of the allegations in this case,
the UK del said it could not speak for the ECGD, which had its
own duties to implement anti-corruption policies and the right 

to insist that BAE Systems provide due diligence information. 

24. (C) US del stressed the difficulty in assessing from the
outside the factors taken into account in the UK's decision.
While concerns remained about the particular case, more critical
was what the case had revealed regarding the UK's legal
framework for preventing foreign bribery.  As the Convention
approaches its tenth anniversary, the WGB must demand that all
parties meet their obligations and maintain high standards.  The
French del spoke of the need to convey a clear message to the
business community and civil society that payment of bribes to
foreign public officials was no longer an acceptable competitive
advantage.  The Canadian del agreed that abandonment of the
investigation created a problem for the Convention.  Following a
discussion which frequently underscored the need to defend the
Convention, and which weighed the merits of various next steps,
France, Italy, New Zealand Greece, Chile, Germany, Ireland, the
Netherlands, Sweden, Spain, Turkey, Switzerland, and the US del
all expressed continuing serious concerns about the UK's
decision and spoke in favor of the WGB (1) issuing a strong
statement to the public relaying those concerns and (2)
conducting a Phase 2 bis review of the UK focused on Convention
implementation.  Although Germany and Canada expressed a
preference for waiting until the results of the UK domestic
judicial review, a position strongly favored by the UK, WGB
consensus ultimately opposed such a delay. 

SWITZERLAND WRITTEN FOLLOW-UP 

25. (SBU) Switzerland reported that its Phase 2 examination had
contributed to greater awareness of its obligations under the
Convention and had spurred long-term cooperation among federal
and cantonal-level authorities, the Swiss business community and
civil society.  Switzerland reported that 23 foreign bribery
cases were initiated in 2005 and 2006, of which 17 were in
connection with the UN Oil for Food program.  A total of 19
cases were still in the investigative stage and four were
closed.  No charges were pressed nor rulings handed down during
the period.  Informed by comments from lead examiners Hungary
and Belgium, the WGB found that Switzerland had taken efforts to
raise awareness, but further measures targeted at small and
medium-sized enterprises and cantonal-level authorities were
required to fully implement WGB recommendations.  Switzerland
had fully implemented: 

- Rec. 3(a) to consider establishing a formal obligation for any
federal authority, civil servant or public official to report
indications of possible bribery to authorities and 

- Rec. 3(d) to consider extending mandatory reporting
obligations for auditors to report to prosecutorial authorities
evidence of possible corrupt practices by those whose accounts
they audit if executive bodies refrain from taking action. 

26. (U) Discussion of Switzerland's follow-up report revealed
certain difficulties encountered by the WGB in distinguishing
between full and partial implementation of recommendations and
highlighted the need for precision in recommendation text.  In
several instances Switzerland had taken action in response to
recommendations, but measures had not yet been finalized.
Switzerland contended it had nonetheless fully implemented the
recommendations.  The WGB ultimately found that Switzerland had
only partially implemented the remaining 8 recommendations. 

REVISION OF ANTI-BRIBERY INSTRUMENTS: DRAFT MANDATE FOR
SUB-GROUPS 

27. (U) The WGB agreed that Chairman Pieth and Vice-Chair
Gavouneli would serve as chairs of two ad hoc sub-groups on (1)
criminalization and (2) prevention issues, involving areas such
as export credit, official development assistance, public 

procurement, auditing and non-tax deductibility.  The sub-groups
are to be open and informal and their task will be to assist the
WGB in completing proposed revisions to anti-bribery instruments
by December 2007.  This would include likely revision of the
1997 Revised Recommendation (requiring approval by the OECD
Council) and possible clarification in Commentaries regarding
interpretations of the Convention. 

TOUR DE TABLE DEFERRED 

28.  (U) The WGB deferred reviewing country enforcement actions
on foreign bribery and UN Oil-for-Food cases to June, given the
press of other agenda items. 

OUTREACH ACTIVITIES 

29. (U) The Secretariat briefed on outreach activities,
including the anticipated signature in April of a Memorandum of
Understanding with the Organization of American States to
strengthen the fight against corruption in the Americas.  The
Secretariat also agreed to provide suggestions on next steps for 

SIPDIS
WGB outreach to China. 

ANNUAL REPORT 

30. (U) The WGB approved the 2006 draft annual report, after
agreeing to a UK request to delete a reference to the BAE/Saudi
investigation.  US del noted that there was nothing
inappropriate with the proposed reference, but did not object to
its deletion.  The French del noted that reference should be
included in the 2007 Annual Report. 

OTHER ITEMS 

31. (U) The Italian delegation briefed on the invitation by the
Government of Italy to hold a Prosecutors' Meeting in Rome in
November as part of an event marking the 10th anniversary of the
Convention in November or December 2007, which may involve
ministerial participation. 

32. (U) The Netherlands del noted that differences in WGB
Parties' positions regarding UNCAC issues have complicated UNCAC
implementation.  They proposed including an agenda item for the
October WGB plenary meeting to exchange ideas about how to
organize in preparation for the second UNCAC Conference of State
Parties. 

33. (U) The US del suggested, with support of Dutch and Swiss
colleagues, that prosecutors plan to meet on the margins of the
June plenary for a brainstorming session to discuss the
usefulness of a prosecutors' forum.  The UK requested that this
be scheduled for the same day as the Tour de Table to facilitate
attendance.  The Chair suggested that the prosecutors also
provide guidance to the Italian delegation regarding the agenda
for the 10th anniversary event. 

34. (U) The June WGB plenary meeting will take place June 19-21,
2007.  (Ad hoc sub-groups were subsequently scheduled to meet on
June 18.)
MORELLA

CONFIDENTIAL: TERRORIST FINANCE: IARA AND FIVE OFFICIALS, JTJ

C O N F I D E N T I A L DUBLIN 001598 

SIPDIS 

STATE FOR EB/ESC/TFS (BSTEPHENSON), S/CT (TKUSHNER),
EUR/UBI, IO/PHO (APEREZ),
NSC FOR MRUPPERT,
TREASURY FOR JZARATE,
AND OFAC DIRECTOR (RWERNER) 

E.O. 12958: DECL: 10/19/2014
TAGS: ETTC KTFN EFIN PTER PREL CVIS ECON LVPR
SUBJECT: TERRORIST FINANCE: IARA AND FIVE OFFICIALS, JTJ
DESIGNATION (LISTS 62 & 63) 

REF: A. STATE 222164 

     B. STATE 222244
     C. STATE 219924 

Classified By: POL/ECON COUNSELOR MARY DALY FOR
REASONS 1.4.(B) AND (D) 

1.(C) Summary. Emboff, drawing on reftel points, spoke on
October 19 to Maurice Biggar, Deputy Director for
International Terrorism & Illicit Drugs and his colleague,
Eoin Duggan, at the DFA.  According to Biggar and Duggan the
USG domestic designation of IARA is an issue of concern as it
targets an Irish citizen, Ibrahim Buisir.  The GOI has no
information on JTJ operations within Ireland.  The IARA
designation came as a surprise, but not an unwelcome one.
Ireland does not currently have legal recourse to freeze
assets of suspected terrorism financiers.  The GOI also does
not have far-reaching intelligence capabilities, so greatly
appreciates information-sharing and cooperation with the USG.
 If both such designations are approved through the UN 1267
Sanctions Committee, the EU will follow suit, thereby
requiring legal action in Ireland and allowing Irish
authorities to freeze assets of Buisir.  The Irish are likely
to welcome such action.  End Summary. 

--------------------------------------------- -------------
List 62: The Islamic African Relief Agency (IARA), Ibrahim
Buisir
--------------------------------------------- ------------- 

2.(C) Biggar had no new information to report regarding the
IARA; however, Ibrahim Buisir, who was named last week as
having ties to Al-Qaeda, is certainly of interest as a dual
Irish-Libyan with links to terrorist financing.  Buisir's
designation on the US domestic list came as a surprise to the
Irish, and the Irish government would have appreciated a
heads up.  That said, the Irish also consider Buisir to be a
problem.  Recently, they tried to prosecute him for credit
card fraud but he was released on a technicality.  He is now
living on welfare. 

3.(C) The USG domestic designation of Buisir does not change
his status.  As an Irish citizen, he is free to move his
assets and to travel, both within country and abroad.
Current Irish law does not allow for the arrest of an
individual suspected of terrorism financing unless the EU has
designated the person.  (Note: A criminal and terrorism law
is pending ratification this fall.)  If the USG designation
is pursued and approved by the UN 1267 Sanctions Committee,
the EU will automatically adopt it, allowing Ireland's
Central Bank legal means to freeze his assets.  The process
from the EU approval to Irish application usually takes a
matter of days.  The Irish are likely to welcome this
designation. 

4.(C) Buisir has successfully used the press to gain sympathy
in the past.  The DFA has concerns that he may do so again,
claiming persecution by the USG.  To date, though, only one
article has made it in the press regarding the designation
and Buisir has refrained from public comments. 

--------------------------------------------
List 63: Jama'at Al-Tawhid Wa'al-Jihad (JTJ)
-------------------------------------------- 

5.(U) The GOI has no information on current activities of
Jama'at Al-Tawhid Wa'al-Jihad (JTJ) in Ireland.  The DFA
welcomes this designation and information sharing on
terrorism financing.  Biggar emphasized that, as with Buisir,
the Irish government cannot act until the UN and EU have
acted. 

----------------
Working Together
---------------- 

6. For the purposes of better understanding the GOI, it is
important to highlight the eagerness and willingness the DFA
expressed regarding the fight against terrorism.  Biggar
mentioned that the DFA and the Gardai (Irish national police)
do not have as close a working relationship as they would
like. As a result, information sharing is limited and rare.
Thus, the USG briefings with the DFA are well received and
appreciated.  The free flow of information is always welcome.
KENNY

CONFIDENTIAL: NORTHERN IRELAND – CONTROLLING THE VIOLENCE

R 091735Z AUG 88
FM AMEMBASSY LONDON
TO SECSTATE WASHDC 8426
INFO AMEMBASSY DUBLIN
NATO COLLECTIVE
SECDEF WASHDC
JCS WASHDC
DIRFBI WASHDC
USNMR SHAPE BE//INTAFF/SPACOS//
USCINCEUR VAIHINGEN GE//POLAD/J5//
CINCUSAFE RAMSTEIN AB GE//POLAD//
CINCUSAREUR HEIDELBERG GE//POLAD//
USDOCOSOUTH NAPLES IT//INTAFF//
USCINCLANT NORFOLK VA//POLAD//
CINCUSNAVEUR LONDON UK//POLAD//
AMCONSUL BELFAST POUCH)
AMCONSUL EDINBURGH POUCH)
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 04 LONDON 16998 

TERREP 

E.O. 12356: DECL: OADR
TAGS: KPRP PTER PGOV MARR MCAP UK EI
SUBJECT:  NORTHERN IRELAND - CONTROLLING THE VIOLENCE 

REF:  A) LONDON 16351  B) LONDON 5653 

1.  CONFIDENTIAL - ENTIRE TEXT. 

2.  SUMMARY:  THE RECENT ESCALATION OF IRA ATTACKS,
WHICH HAVE INCLUDED NOT ONLY MORE KILLINGS IN NORTHERN
IRELAND BUT ALSO BOMBINGS AT UK MILITARY BASES IN
CONTINENTAL EUROPE AND THE FIRST BOMBING IN BRITAIN
ITSELF SINCE 1984, HAVE CAUSED HMG TO REEXAMINE ITS
EFFORTS TO CONTROL IRA TERRORISM.  THE INITIAL PROGNOSIS
BY OFFICIALS IN LONDON IS THAT THERE IS NOT A GREAT DEAL
MORE THAT CAN BE DONE IN THE SHORT TERM OTHER THAN TO
INCREASE ALERT LEVELS AND OTHER PRECAUTIONS AGAINST
TERRORIST ATTACKS AT MILITARY INSTALLATIONS, KEY
GOVERNMENT OFFICES, AND OTHER LIKELY IRA TARGETS. 

THE IRA MIGHT BE PLANNING ATTACKS DIRECTLY AGAINST OR TO
COINCIDE WITH CERTAIN UPCOMING EVENTS, INCLUDING THE
BEGINNING OF THE CORONER'S INQUEST IN GIBRLATAR INTO THE
KILLING THERE OF THREE IRA TERRORISTS LAST JANUARY, AND
THE CONSERVATIVE PARTY CONFERENCE AT BRIGHTON IN OCTOBER. 

THE ATTACKS HAVE NOT WEAKENED THE GOVERNMENT'S RESOLVE
TO CONTINUE WITH ITS CURRENT POLICIES, WHICH INCLUDE
TRYING TO RECTIFY CATHOLIC GRIEVANCES IN NORTHERN
IRELAND.  THERE HAVE BEEN NEW DEMANDS TO INCREASE UK
MILITARY FORCES IN ULSTER AND TO REINTRODUCE THE
PREVENTIVE INTERNMENT OF KNOWN IRA ACTIVISTS; THE
GOVERNMENT HOPES THESE STEPS WILL NOT BE NECESSARY AND
FOR NOW HAS NO SUCH PLANS. 

UK OFFICIALS ARE PLEASED WITH PROGRESS IN GAINING THE
COOPERATION OF THE GOVERNMENT IN DUBLIN IN THE FIGHT
AGAINST THE IRA, BUT ALSO ARE CONVINCED THAT THE IRISH
REPUBLIC COULD DO MORE TO HELP.  PERHAPS THE SHOCK OF
THE CURRENT WAVE OF ATTACKS, SAYS HMG, WILL ACCELERATE
THE IMPROVEMENT IN SECURITY COOPERATION BETWEEN THE TWO
GOVERNMENTS.  LONDON HOPES THAT IMPROVED INTRA-EUROPEAN
COOPERATION IN COMBATTING TERRORISM WILL HELP TO
MINIMIZE THE EFFECTIVENESS OF IRA ATTACKS ON BRITISH
MILITARY FORCES STATIONED IN EUROPE. 

END SUMMARY. 

THE IRA PLAYS TO THE NEWS AND CHALLENGES LONDON TO REACT
--------------------------------------------- -----------
3.  THE RECENT ESCALATION OF TERRORIST ATTACKS BY THE
IRA, INCLUDING BOMBINGS OF UK MILITARY TARGETS IN
CONTINENTAL EUROPE AND THE FIRST IRA BOMBING IN BRITAIN
ITSELF IN FOUR YEARS, HAS REFOCUSED ATTENTIONS IN
WHITEHALL ON THE PROBLEM OF CONTROLLING IRA TERRORISM.
WHAT THE KILLINGS BY THE IRA HAVE NOT DONE IS UNDERMINE
EITHER THE THATCHER GOVERNMENT'S RESOLVE TO STICK TO ITS
POLICIES ON NORTHERN IRELAND OR THE CONSERVATIVE
POLITICAL CONSENSUS BEHIND THOSE POLICIES. 

4.  THE NORTHERN IRELAND OFFICE AND HMG POLICE OFFICIALS
CALCULATE THAT THE IRA PLANS ITS ATTACKS MAINLY FOR NEWS
VALUE.  SPOKESMEN FOR THE IRA AND ITS POLITICAL WING,
SINN FEIN, HAVE CONFIRMED THIS IN RECENT INTERVIEWS WITH
JOURNALISTS.  THE IRA WANTS ITS ATTACKS TO SHOCK THE
PUBLIC IN BRITAIN AND WEAR DOWN BRITISH DETERMINATION TO
STAY IN NORTHERN IRELAND.  THE UK SUNDAY NEWSPAPER "THE
OBSERVER" REPORTED ON AUGUST 7 THAT IRA SOURCES TOLD ITS
REPORTERS THE AUGUST 1 BOMBING OF AN ARMY DEPOT IN
LONDON (REFTEL A) WAS UNDERTAKEN ON THE BORDER OF PRIME
MINISTER THATCHER'S OWN PARLIAMENTARY CONSTITUENCY WITH
THE HOPES THAT IT WOULD KILL MANY SOLDIERS (ONE DIED IN
THE BLAST) AND FORCE MRS. THATCHER TO RETURN EARLY FROM
HER AUSTRALIA VISIT. 

5.  THE BOMBINGS HAVE EMBARASSED THE GOVERNMENT BUT NOT
NEARLY SO MUCH AS THE IRA APPARENTLY WOULD LIKE.  SO
FAR, IT HAS STIFFENED RATHER THAN WEAKENED LONDON'S
RESOLVE.  AND, WHILE THE KILLINGS HAVE SCORED INTENSIVE
NEWS COVERAGE, THEY PROBABLY HAVE NOT INCREASED
SIGNIFICANTLY THE NUMBERS OF BRITONS WHO AGREE WITH THE
"TIME TO GO" MOVEMENT FOR A BRITISH WITHDRAWAL FROM
ULSTER.  THERE HAVE BEEN SIGNS THAT MANY ORDINARY
CITIZENS DO NOT UNDERSTAND WHY MILITARY INSTALLATIONS
AND OTHER POTENTIAL TERRORIST TARGETS CANNOT BE
PROTECTED BETTER.  IN UK TELEVISION INTERVIEWS, SEVERAL
PEOPLE WHO LIVE NEAR THE NORTH LONDON ARMY BASE ATTACKED
ON AUGUST 1 SAID THEY HAD ALWAYS BEEN AMAZED THAT
SECURITY WAS SO LAX AT THE BASE.  BUT MANY OTHER
BRITONS, EVEN WHILE THEY WINCE AT EACH DAY'S TALLY OF
BOMBING VICTIMS, DO NOT EXPECT THEIR GOVERNMENT TO BE
ABLE TO FEND OFF TERRORISTS EVERY TIME.  THEY APPEAR TO
UNDERSTAND, AS EX-PRIME MINISTER STANLEY BALDWIN TOLD
THE HOUSE OF COMMONS IN 1932, THAT DESPITE ANY
PRECAUTIONS "THE BOMBER WILL ALWAYS GET THROUGH." 

THE ESCALATION WAS EXPECTED
---------------------------
6.  SECRETARY OF STATE FOR NORTHERN IRELAND TOM KING
DECLARED IN LATE JULY THAT THE IRA WAS BECOMING
INCREASINGLY "INCOMPETENT," AS EVIDENCED BY A SERIES OF
BUNGLED ATTACKS IN NORTHERN IRELAND IN WHICH INNOCENT
BYSTANDERS WERE KILLED OR INJURED INSTEAD OF MEMBERS OF
THE SECURITY FORCES.  THE RECENT ESCALATION OF KILLINGS
CAME SO FAST AFTER KING'S STATEMENT AS TO SEEM PROMPTED
BY IT.  THE NORTHERN IRELAND OFFICE (NIO) TOLD US THAT
KING'S PRONOUNCEMENT WAS OVERLY OPTIMISTIC AND WAS NOT
REFLECTED IN ANY RELAXATION OF VIGILANCE BY THE POLICE
AND MILITARY FORCES.  SECURITY OFFICIALS HAVE KNOWN THE
IRA WAS MERELY PAUSING AND WAS OVERDUE FOR A COME-BACK. 

7.  NIO OFFICIALS BELIEVE THAT EVER SINCE UK SECURITY
FORCES REVEALED THEIR PENETRATION OF IRA COMMUNICATIONS
WHEN THEY KILLED EIGHT IRA TERRORISTS IN MAY 1987 AT
LOUGHGALL, NORTHERN IRELAND, THE IRA HAS BEEN HOLDING
BACK WHILE IT CHANGED ITS METHODS.  THE TERRORISTS HAVE
AMASSED TONS OF ARMAMENTS, CHIEFLY FROM LIBYA, BUT HAVE
BEEN FEELING THEIR WAY WITH NEW PROCEDURES FOR MAKING
AND COMMUNICATING DECISIONS.  THE KILLING OF CIVILIAN
BYSTANDERS AT ENNISKILLEN IN DECEMBER OF LAST YEAR AND
IN SEVERAL OTHER APPARENTLY BUNGLED IRA ATTACKS SINCE
THEN PROBABLY WAS DUE IN PART TO A DECENTRALIZATION OF
IRA DECISION-MAKING.  TO AVOID LEAKS AND INTERCEPTS,
LOCAL IRA UNITS WERE TOLD TO OPERATE INDEPENDENTLY.  SAS
AND POLICE SPECIAL BRANCH UNITS HAVE EXCELLENT
INTELLIGENCE SOURCES WHICH THE IRA CORRECTLY ASSUMES
INCLUDE "MOLES" IN ITS OWN RANKS.  THE SAFETY WARNING
FOR THE IRA, AND THE BOAST OF UK AUTHORITIES, IS THAT IN
NORTHERN IRELAND "EVERY TREE HAS ITS SPECIAL BRANCH." 

8.  AFTER MORE THAN HALF A YEAR OF PREPARATIONS, UK
OFFICIALS TOLD US, THE IRA PLANNED A SERIES OF ATTACKS
WHICH WAS TO INCLUDE THE GIBRALTAR BOMBING IN JANUARY.
THE FAILURE OF THAT ATTACK (REFTEL B) AND THE REVELATION
THAT ONCE AGAIN UK SECURITY OFFICIALS WERE AWARE OF ITS
PLANS PROBABLY CAUSED THE IRA TO DELAY OR DEFER OTHER
ATTACKS.  IT WENT AHEAD WITH BOMBINGS DIRECTED AGAINST
UK MILITARY PERSONNEL IN OTHER COUNTRIES OF EUROPE,
APPARENTLY SECURE IN THE BELIEF THAT AT LEAST ONE
"ACTIVE SERVICE UNIT" EMPLACED TO OPERATE IN GERMANY AND
THE NETHERLANDS HAD NOT BEEN DETECTED BY EITHER UK OR
LOCAL SECURITY OFFICIALS.  WHATEVER ATTACKS HAD BEEN
PLANNED IN BRITAIN ITSELF PROBABLY WERE JUDGED TO BE
MORE RISKY AND WERE DELAYED AGAIN, BUT UK AUTHORITIES
WERE CONVINCED THEY WOULD OCCUR EVENTUALLY. 

9.  UK SECURITY OFFICIALS KNEW OF MANY IRA MEMBERS AND
SYMPATHIZERS IN BRITAIN AND WATCHED THEM AS CLOSELY AS
POSSIBLE.  BUT WHEN THE ATTACK CAME IN NORTH LONDON ON
AUGUST 1 IT WAS BY A "SLEEPER," AN INDIVIDUAL OR A UNIT
OF THE IRA NOT KNOWN BY SPECIAL BRANCH TO BE IN ENGLAND
AND READY FOR AN ATTACK HERE.  THERE MIGHT BE, OF
COURSE, OTHER TERRORISTS IN BRITAIN PREPARING FOR
ADDITIONAL ATTACKS.  MINISTRY OF DEFENSE CONTACTS TOLD
US THAT A GREAT MANY DEFENSE INSTALLATIONS HERE ARE
"SOFT TARGETS" SUCH AS RECRUITING OFFICES AND URBAN
DEPOTS WHERE IT IS NOT FEASIBLE TO INCREASE SECURITY
PRECAUTIONS SIGNIFICANTLY.  IF A WELL-TRAINED IRA UNIT
IS POISED AND EQUIPPED FOR ANOTHER ATTACK, SAID THE MOD,
IT COULD WELL FIND ITS MARK. 

INTERNMENT FOR THE IRA IN ULSTER?
---------------------------------
10.  WHILE THERE MAY NOT BE MUCH MORE BY WAY OF
PRECAUTIONS THAT CAN BE TAKEN IN BRITAIN, THE SITUATION
IS DIFFERENT IN NORTHERN IRELAND.  SOME BACKBENCH
CONSERVATIVE MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT HAVE REACTED TO THE
RECENT ATTACKS HERE AND IN ULSTER BY DEMANDING THE
REINTRODUCTION OF INTERNMENT, THE IMPRISONMENT WITHOUT
TRIAL OR FORMAL CHARGES IN COURT OF KNOWN MEMBERS OF THE
IRA AND OTHER VIOLENT GROUPS, BOTH CATHOLIC AND
PROTESTANT. 

11.  INTERNMENT WAS ADOPTED IN AUGUST 1971 WHEN 450
MEMBERS OF THE IRA WERE ROUNDED UP BY THE ARMY AND
POLICE IN NORTHERN IRELAND IN "OPERATION DEMETRIUS."
100 OF THOSE ARRESTED HAD TO BE RELEASED BECAUSE OF
INSUFFICIENT INTELLIGENCE TO BE CERTAIN OF THE CHARGES
AGAINST THEM, SO THAT THE COMMAND STRUCTURE OF THE IRA
APPARENTLY WAS LEFT INTACT.  OPPONENTS OF INTERNMENT NOW
CONCEDE THAT CURRENT INTELLIGENCE IS SO MUCH BETTER THAT
A NEW ROUND-UP PROBABLY WOULD SUCCEED IN GREATLY
DISRUPTING IRA PLANS.  TOM KING SAID RECENTLY THAT THE
OPTION OF INTERNMENT REMAINS "UNDER REVIEW," BUT OUR
CONTACTS IN GOVERNMENT TOLD US THAT IRA ATTACKS WOULD
HAVE TO BE FAR MORE SERIOUS FOR THE OPTION TO BE
CHOSEN.  HMG KNOWS THAT ADOPTING INTERNMENT WOULD BE A
PROPAGANDA VICTORY AND A RECRUITMENT BOON FOR THE IRA.
ALSO, INTERNMENT VERY LIKELY WOULD NOT WORK UNLESS IT
WAS ADOPTED SIMULTANEOUSLY BY THE REPUBLIC OF IRELAND,
WHICH UK OFFICIALS REGARD AS EXTREMELY UNLIKELY. 

THE UK WANTS MORE HELP FROM IRELAND
-----------------------------------
12.  UK OFFICIALS BELIEVE THAT ONE KEY TO SUCCESS IN THE
WAR AGAINST IRA TERRORISM IS IMPROVED SECURITY
COOPERATION WITH THE REPUBLIC OF IRELAND.  THEY THINK
THAT DUBLIN HAS NOT YET FELT COMPELLED TO PUT ITS WEIGHT
FULLY AGAINST THE TERRORISTS IN PART BECAUSE THE IRA,
EVEN THOUGH IT DECLARES THE DUBLIN GOVERNMENT IS
"ILLEGAL" AND THAT THE IRISH POLICE AND MILITARY ARE
LEGITIMATE TARGETS FOR ATTACK, HAS WISELY REFRAINED FROM
ENDANGERING ITS SANCTUARY ON THE IRISH SIDE OF THE
BORDER BY ATTACKING THE REPUBLIC'S OFFICIALS AND ARMED
FORCES THERE. 

13.  THERE WERE EVENTS IN 1987 WHICH EMBARRASSED THE
DUBLIN GOVERNMENT INTO GREATER ACTION, SAY UK OFFICIALS,
SUCH AS THE CAPTURE OF THE ARMS SHIP EKSUND AND THE
REVELATION THEREFROM THAT THE IRA HAD BEEN IMPORTING
LARGE QUANTITIES OF ARMS FROM LIBYA INTO IRELAND TO BE
USED AGAINST FORCES IN NORTHERN IRELAND.  THE SUBSEQUENT
FAILURE OF THE INTENSIVE EFFORT OF IRISH FORCES IN
"OPERATION MALLARD" TO FIND MANY OF THOSE ARMAMENTS, AND
THE PROLONGED INABILITY OF THE IRISH POLICE IN LATE 1987
TO CAPTURE THE RENEGADE EX-IRA MEMBER AND RAMPANT
CRIMINAL DESI O'HARE, THE POPULARLY STYLED "BORDER FOX,"
EMBARRASSED IRELAND AND ITS SECURITY FORCES STILL MORE.
NIO OFFICIALS TOLD US THEY BELIEVE IT IS MORE USEFUL NOW
TO USE EACH ADDITIONAL IRA ATTACK, AND THE PRESUMPTION
THAT THE IRA TRAVELS RELATIVELY FREELY IN THE REPUBLIC
AND HAS MUNITIONS STORED THERE, AS ARGUMENTS TO PROD
DUBLIN INTO MORE COOPERATION. 

14.  AT A RECENT EC MEETING IN HANOVER MRS. THATCHER
ONCE AGAIN CONFRONTED IRISH PRIME MINISTER HAUGHEY OVER
THE NEED FOR DUBLIN TO BE MORE HELPFUL.  ACCORDING TO
CABINET SOURCES HERE, HAUGHEY CONCEDED THAT IRELAND'S
POLICE AND MILITARY DO NOT HAVE THE CAPABILITY TO
COOPERATE FULLY WITH BRITISH FORCES IN STOPPING THE
IRA.  IN RESPONSE TO THATCHER'S OFFER TO EITHER EXTEND
BRITISH ASSISTANCE IN THE FORM OF TRAINING AND EQUIPMENT
OR TO ARRANGE SUCH ASSISTANCE FROM OTHER COUNTRIES IF
NECESSARY, HAUGHEY PROMISED HIS GOVERNMENT WOULD
REASSESS THE NEED FOR TRAINING AND OTHER SECURITY
IMPROVEMENTS. 

NO END IN SIGHT
---------------
15.  HMG OFFICIALS REGARD THE NORTHERN IRELAND PROBLEM
AS A PERENNIAL IRRITANT WHICH WILL NOT GO AWAY IN THE
FORESEEABLE FUTURE.  NO ONE WILL FIND A SOLOMONIC WAY TO
SATISFY THE CONTRADICTORY DEMANDS OF UNIONISTS AND
REPUBLICANS.  THE PERCEIVED GRIEVANCES OF BOTH SIDES
WILL CONTINUE TO GENERATE CONFLICT.  WITH NO NEAR-TERM
SOLUTION IN SIGHT, THE PRINCIPAL GOALS OF GOVERNMENT ARE
TO KEEP VIOLENCE DOWN TO TOLERABLE LEVELS IN NORTHERN
IRELAND, STOP THE SPREAD OF IRA ATTACKS TO BRITAIN AND
ELSEWHERE, AND RECTIFY THOSE OF THE GRIEVANCES
UNDERLYING THE CONFLICT WHICH ARE LEGITIMATE. 

16.  THE GOVERNMENT IN LONDON BELIEVES THAT CONTINUED
IRA TERRORISM IS INEVITABLE.  THEY LIKE TO POINT OUT,
HOWEVER, THAT THE VIOLENCE IN NORTHERN IRELAND, EVEN
WITH THE RECENT ESCALATION, IS VERY MUCH LESS THAN IN
THE PEAK YEAR 1972 AND IN MOST INTERVENING YEARS.  UK
OFFICIALS ARE CONFIDENT THEY CAN KEEP THE KILLINGS IN
ULSTER TO NOT MUCH MORE THAN CURRENT LEVELS WITHOUT ANY
INCREASE IN SECURITY FORCES THERE.  IRA ATTACKS IN
BRITAIN ITSELF AND IN EUROPE ARE A DIFFERENT MATTER.
COUNTER-TERRORISM TIES AND COOPERATION AMONG EUROPEAN
COUNTRIES HAS IMPROVED DRAMATICALLY IN RECENT YEARS, AND
THE UK IS CAUTIOUSLY OPTIMISTIC THAT THE IRA CAN BE HELD
IN CHECK OUTSIDE OF NORTHERN IRELAND EVEN THOUGH ATTACKS
WILL CONTINUE TO OCCUR. 

17.  THERE ARE MANY EVENTS IN NORTHERN IRELAND WHICH
MIGHT BRING IRA ATTACKS, SUCH AS THE FIFTH ANNIVERSARY
OF THE MAZE PRISON ESCAPES ON SEPTEMBER 25 AND SEVERAL
DIFFERENT DAYS WHEN CATHOLIC OR PROTESTANT ORGANIZATIONS
WILL BE HAVING PUBLIC MARCHES.  IN ADDITION, THERE ARE
SEVERAL UPCOMING EVENTS AND ANNIVERSARIES WHICH COULD BE
CONSIDERED AS POSSIBLE PERIODS OF INCREASED THREAT OF
IRA TERRORIST ATTACK IN BRITAIN AND EUROPE.  PROMINENT
AMONG THEM ARE: 

-- THE BEGINNING, NOW SCHEDULED FOR SEPTEMBER 6, OF THE
INQUEST BY THE GIBRALTAR CORONER INTO THE KILLING OF
THREE IRA TERRORISTS THERE LAST JANUARY. 

-- THE ANNUAL CONSERVATIVE PARTY CONFERENCE, OCTOBER
11-14.  THE CONFERENCE WILL BE AT BRIGHTON THIS YEAR,
THE SAME PLACE WHERE AN IRA BOMB CAME CLOSE TO KILLING
MARGARET THATCHER AND A MAJOR PART OF HER CABINET DURING
THE PARTY CONFERENCE IN 1984. 

-- 1989 WILL MARK THE 20TH ANNIVERSARY OF BOTH THE
INTRODUCTION OF BRITISH TROOPS INTO NORTHERN IRELAND AND
THE CREATION OF THE PROVISIONAL IRA.  1989 COULD BE A
BAD YEAR FOR COMMEMORATIVE TERRORISM. 

PRICE

Jan Palach Week, 1989: The Beginning of the End for Czechoslovak Communism

Washington, D.C., August 1st, 2011 – The brutal suppression by Czechoslovak Communist authorities of commemorative ceremonies for “Palach Week” 20 years ago this month marked the beginning of the end of the regime in the annus mirabilis 1989, according to secret police, Communist Party, and dissident documents posted today on the Web by the Czechoslovak Documentation Centre (Prague) and the National Security Archive (www.nsarchive.org) at George Washington University (Washington, D.C.).

Various independent civic initiatives (also known in the official Communist press as “anti-state” and “anti-socialist forces”) had planned to lay wreaths at the site in Prague’s main Wenceslas Square where the student Jan Palach in January 1969 had burned himself to death in protest against the repression that followed the Soviet occupation of Czechoslovakia in August 1968.  Also planned was a pilgrimage to the rural cemetery where Palach’s ashes were interred.

But the Communist secret police cracked down with beatings, tear gas, and mass arrests, including the dissident playwright and future Czechoslovak president Václav Havel.  The repression occurred at the exact moment in January 1989 that the signatory countries to the Helsinki Final Act (the Conference on Security and Cooperation in Europe, or CSCE) were meeting in Vienna, and drew widespread protests from abroad, including from U.S. Secretary of State George Shultz, leading Soviet dissident Andrei Sakharov, and perhaps most eloquently, American playwright Arthur Miller.

Today’s Web posting includes never-before-published documents from Czechoslovak archives, including the secret police reports on the demonstrations in January 1989 and the internal Communist Party briefings and instructions (the Party line) to cadres about the events of January.  Also included are key Charter 77 and other dissident and samizdat statements, and several international protests of the time.

The posting republishes the detailed chronology of events in January and February 1989, originally written by the Czechoslovak Documentation Centre for its quarterly publication Acta (Vol. 3, No. 9-12), compiled and edited by Jan Vladislav in collaboration with Vilém Prečan, titled “Czechoslovakia: Heat in January 1989” and ultimately printed in December 1989 just as the “velvet revolution” toppled the Communist regime and put former prisoner Havel in the presidential office in Prague Castle.

Leading the posting is Professor Vilém Prečan’s essay “Palach’s Legacy: An Appeal to Czechoslovaks in the 1989 Struggle for Freedom.”   The final section of the posting includes the digital image of an original letter from Palach himself in 1969, urging the occupation of Radio Prague and a call for a general strike.  Only days later, he burned himself to death.

“These documents posted on the Web today are the Internet equivalent of the wreath that Václav Havel tried to place in Wenceslas Square in January 1989,” remarked Thomas Blanton, director of the National Security Archive at George Washington University.  “We don’t face arrest like he did for this commemoration, but we do have the responsibility of never forgetting those sacrifices, both by Jan Palach, and by everyone who made the peaceful revolutions of 1989.”

Section 1: The Meaning of “Palach Week”

Prague January 1989 (CSDS collection)

Essay.  January 2009, Prague – Vilém Prečan, “Palach’s Legacy: An Appeal to Czechoslovaks in the 1989 Struggle for Freedom”
Translation by Derek Paton.

Document 1.  January 10, 1989, Prague – Statement by the Movement for Civil Liberties: Jan Palach’s Challenge
CSDS Prague, Palach Week Collection.
Translation by Alice and Gerald Turner (pseudonym “A. G. Brain”), published in Acta, Document 4.

Document 2.  February 5, 1989, Prague – Ludvik Vaculik: Communism is best-ial
Libri prohibiti, Prague, Ludvik Vaculik Collection.
Translation by Alice and Gerald Turner (pseudonym “A. G. Brain”), published in Acta, Document 55.

Document 3.  February 16, 1989, Prague – Statement by the Movement for Civil Liberties: Paths to democracy in the wake of the January events
CSDS Prague, Palach Week Collection.
Translation by Alice and Gerald Turner (pseudonym “A. G. Brain”), published in Acta, Document 61.

Section 2: Primary Sources on “Palach Week” January 1989

Prague January 1989 (CSDS collection)

Document 4.  January 1989, Prague – A flyer in which five independent initiatives invite citizens to participate on January 15 in a Jan Palach memorial in Prague, as well as a January 21 pilgrimage to his grave in the village of Všetaty (30 km north of Prague).
CSDS Prague, Palach Week Collection.
Translation by Todd Hammond.

Document 5.  January 16, 1989. Prague – Internal information (No. 53) on the events of January 13 to 15, 1989, provided by the Communist Party (CPCz) to Presidium members and candidates and to CPCz Central Committee secretaries.  The briefing gives times and places of the various “unauthorized assemblies” and detentions, the number of security forces (2200 from the SNB and 1300 from the Peoples’ Militia), the recommendation that the militia be equipped with batons for next time and that security “prepare a closed-off area into which the crowd will be pushed….”
National Archive Prague, ÚV KSČ (CPCz CC), Documentation, 1989.
Translation by Todd Hammond.

Document 6.  January 17, 1989, Prague – The Charter 77 statement addressed to the governments participating in the CSCE, then meeting in Vienna.  The Charter statement says “only time will tell” if “the signing by 35 states of a document whose clauses some of them neither observe nor have any obvious intention of doing so, will nevertheless help to stimulate an improvement in the human rights situation,” and points out that those arrested during the Palach Week memorials were in custody “not for planting bombs, but for laying flowers.”
CSDS Prague, Charter 77 Collection.
Translation by Alice and Gerald Turner (pseudonym “A. G. Brain”), published in Acta, Document 21.

Document 7.  January 17, 1989, Vienna – Speech and press conference by U.S. Secretary of State George Shultz at the conclusion of the CSCE meetings, including his denunciation of the Czechoslovak authorities for their repression of the Palach Week commemorations with “rubber truncheons, tear gas, and water cannons” “in direct violation of the commitments just solemnly given by the Government of Czechoslovakia.”
U.S. Department of State Bulletin, March 1989, pp. 50-54.

Document 8.  January 17, 1989. Prague – Internal Party information (No. 54)on the events of January 16, 1989 on Wenceslas Square, Prague, provided to CPCz Presidium members and candidates and to CPCz Central Committee secretaries.  This briefing describes the arrests of Havel and other Charter 77 representatives “whose bouquets were confiscated by the officers present.”  Attached is an appendix to the previous Internal Party information 53, listing individuals who received medical treatment (for injuries including bone fractures, concussion, and shoulder dislocation) after the repression of the January 15 “anti-social events.”
National Archive Prague, ÚV KSČ (CPCz CC), Documentation, 1989.
Translation by Todd Hammond.

Document 9.  January 18, 1989, Prague – Internal Party information (No. 55) on the events of January 17, 1989, as provided to CPCz Presidium members and candidates and to CPCz Central Committee secretaries.  The briefing reports that the “so-called independent initiatives” continued “to intensify the pressure on the state organs,” which had to clear Wenceslas Square twice on that day.  The Party line is that the security forces used only “moderate measures,” but also of course water cannons.
National Archive Prague, ÚV KSČ (CPCz CC), Documentation, 1989.
Translation by Todd Hammond.

Document 10.  January 19, 1989, Prague – Internal Party information (No. 56) on the events of January 18, 1989 in Prague, provided to CPCz Presidium members and candidates and to CPCz Central Committee secretaries.  The briefing notes that both American and British diplomats are among the crowd, “a provocational assembly of anti-socialist elements” that numbered at least 1,000 at the statue of St. Wenceslas, plus “around 2000 spectators.”  Instead of attacking as on previous days, the security forces “remained hidden at their readiness and reserve locations and prepared for immediate commitment” but did not intervene.
National Archive Prague, ÚV KSČ (CPCz CC), Documentation, 1989.
Translation by Todd Hammond.

Prague January 1989 (CSDS collection)

Document 11.  January 19, 1989, Prague – Eyewitness accounts of the January 19th demonstration and repression, compiled from reports telephoned to Radio Free Europe.  Witnesses describe the police attacks as the “most brutal” of the week, and note the relative restraint of the uniformed SNB police compared to the riot police units, also called the “strong-arm squad” or “Jakeš’ smurfs.”
CSDS Prague, Palach Week Collection.
Translation by Alice and Gerald Turner (pseudonym “A. G. Brain”), published in Acta, Document 29.

Document 12.  January 22, 1989, Prague – The head of the State Security Karel Vykypěl provides a concise report to the Minister of the Interior František Kincl on the Palach memorials and “provocational assemblies” between January 15 and 21, 1989.  The report states that these events “clearly displayed the mounting aggressiveness of the adversarial community” and blames the “signatories of Charter 77 and the other so-called independent initiatives.”
ABS (Archive of Security Units) Prague, A 34/1-1497, MBO Jan Palach 1989.
Translation by Todd Hammond.

Document 13.  January 24, 1989, Prague – The CC CPCz Secretary General expresses thanks to the members of the People’s Militia for their participation in suppressing the demonstrations, and assures them that the “decisions…taken by the organs of the party and state… for the maintenance of security and order in the center of the capital city… have been accepted with full understanding” by “the absolute majority of our population.”
National Archive Prague, ÚV KSČ, Miloš Jakeš Office, 1989.
Translation by Todd Hammond.

Document 14.  January 25, 1989, Prague – Memorandum of the Government of the Czech Socialist Republic on the events in Prague of January 15 to 21, 1989.  The government formally states its support for “the decisive measures taken by the security units” and declares “that the vast majority of our citizens condemns” the Palach memorials and gatherings.
National Archive Prague, ÚPV ČSSR (Office of the ČSSR Government), Memoranda and decisions of Government sessions, 1989.
Translation by Todd Hammond.

Document 15.  January 25, 1989, Prague – The Minister of the Interior František Kincl provides Prime Minister Ladislav Adamec with a detailed report “on the anti-social activities of anti-socialist elements on January 15-22, 1989, in Prague and in Všetaty… and on the security measures taken to secure calm and public order.”  The report includes specific details on the demonstrations and repressions of January 19, including crowd estimates (on the low side) of 2500 persons who “fled toward the lower part of the square” after “security units intervened” at 17:15, but “were prevented in this by a coordinated intervention by the People’s Militia.”  The report also describes the repression of the Všetaty pilgrimage on January 21, including the presence of foreign diplomats from the U.S., Canada, Great Britain, and Denmark.  On January 21, the report states, “449 persons were identity checked,” “227 persons were sent back,” and “another 222 persons who refused to change their minds about continuing to Všetaty were taken for questioning.”
National Archive Prague, ÚPV ČSSR (Office of the ČSSR Government), Memoranda and decisions of Government sessions, 1989.
Translation by Todd Hammond.

Document 16.  January 29, 1989, Roxbury, USA – Arthur Miller denounces the imprisonment of Václav Havel, and describes his arrest as “simply an attempt to call back the smoke that Palach sent billowing into the sky.”
CSDS Prague, Václav Havel Collection, Box 13.
Published in the samizdat journal Lidové noviny, under the title “Where is the future?” and subsequently in Acta, Document 48.

Document 17.  January 29, 1989. Moscow – Noted Soviet dissidents Yelena Bonner, Andrei Sakharov, and others send a message to the heads of states participating in the CSCE, describing the repression in Prague as a “blatant violation of the Vienna accords.”
CSDS Prague, Palach Week Collection.
Translation by Alice and Gerald Turner (pseudonym “A. G. Brain”), published in Acta, Document 47.

Document 18.  February 21, 1989. Prague – Václav Havel’s final statement as defendant at the Prague 1 District Court.  Havel dissects the indictment’s use of the words “anti-state” and “anti-socialist” as “no more than a derogatory label for all citizens who inconvenience the regime for whatever reason….”
CSDS Prague, Václav Havel Collection, Box 13.
Translation by Alice and Gerald Turner (pseudonym “A. G. Brain”), published in Acta, Document 66.

Section 3: Documentation from 1969

Document 19. [January 6, 1969, Prague.] – Jan Palach, in a letter to the student leader Lubomír Holeček, proposes a student occupation of Prague Radio and the broadcast of a call for a general strike.
ABS (Archive of Security Units) Prague, H-682/1. Fascimile in Petr Blažek, Patrik Eichler, Jakub Jareš et al.: Jan Palach ´69. Prague: Togga, FF UK, and ÚSTR, 2009, pp. 600–602.
Translation by Todd Hammond.

Document 20.  January 21, 1969, Washington D.C. – The Central Intelligence Bulletin of the CIA, circulated to top U.S. government officials on the day after the inauguration of new president Richard Nixon, reports that “[t]housands of disaffected youths yesterday marched in the streets in memory of Jan Paluch [sic], a 21-year-old student whose self-immolation has aroused the entire population” of Czechoslovakia.
National Archives & Records Administration (College Park, Maryland), CIA CREST Database.

Document 21.  January 21, 1969, Washington D.C. – The top National Security Council staff person for Eastern European matters, Helmut Sonnenfeldt, informs national security adviser Henry Kissinger: “the regime will have to decide whether to attempt to master the situation by itself or to let the Soviets do it.  It will probably prefer the former course to minimize brutality, even at the risk of thereby making itself a Soviet tool.”
U.S. Department of State, Foreign Relations of the United States series, 1969-1976, Volume XXIX, pp. 203-204.

Document 22.  February 3, 1969, Prague – The U.S. Embassy cables Washington with an assessment of the “growing assertiveness of conservatives and ‘realists’ in wake of emotional upsurge evoked by Palach suicide” and remarks that the “Palach self-immolation was major setback for hardliners, arresting trend toward public apathy on which they count.”
U.S. Department of State, Foreign Relations of the United States series, 1969-1976, Volume XXIX, pp. 204-206.

Document 23.  February 26, 1969, Washington D.C. – The Central Intelligence Bulletin of the CIA reports that the latest “suicide-by-fire in Prague’s Wenceslas Square” [by 19-year-old student Jan Zajic] “is not likely to generate widespread public disturbance or precipitate a political crisis as did the Palach affair in mid-January” because “the population has become more or less inured to such incidents by over 30 self-immolation attempts.”
National Archives & Records Administration (College Park, Maryland), CIA CREST Database.

Section 4: The chronology of January – February 1989

The chronology of the events of January and February 1989 before and after the “Palach Week,” written by the Czechoslovak Documentation Centre for its quarterly publication Acta, in Vol. 3, No. 9-12, Winter 1989, compiled and edited by Jan Vladislav in collaboration with Vilém Prečan, titled “Czechoslovakia: Heat in January 1989” and ultimately printed in December 1989.

SECRET//NOFORN: CHINA ARMS EMBARGO: APRIL 2 PSC DEBATE AND NEXT

S E C R E T SECTION 01 OF 03 BRUSSELS 001510 

SIPDIS 

NOFORN 

E.O. 12958: DECL: 04/06/2014
TAGS: PARM PHUM PREL PINR EUN USEU BRUSSELS
SUBJECT: CHINA ARMS EMBARGO: APRIL 2 PSC DEBATE AND NEXT
STEPS FOR U.S. 

REF: A. USEU TODAY 04/06/04
     B. BRUSSELS 1464
     C. STATE 68263
     D. PRAGUE 390 

Classified By: USEU Poloff Van Reidhead for reasons 1.4 (b) and (d) 

-------
SUMMARY
------- 

1. (S/NF) The EU Political and Security Committee (PSC)
discussed the EU arms embargo on China during a heated 90
minute exchange on April 2.  PSC Ambassadors generally agreed
that the issue -- of whether, when and how to lift the
embargo -- should be sent back down to working groups for
further study before being presented to political groups for
a decision.  France objected, however, and succeeded in
getting agreement to discuss the issue at the April 26 FMs
meeting (GAERC) -- but failed in its campaign to secure an
early decision.  The debate will likely continue well into
the Dutch EU Presidency.  This cable draws on a detailed
readout and a sensitive internal report provided to Poloff by
UK and Hungarian contacts (please protect accordingly), as
well as background provided in recent days by other
interlocutors.  It also offers a strategy for continuing US
engagement. 

--------------------------------------
PSC Reacts Badly to Latest US Demarche
-------------------------------------- 

2. (S/NF) PSC Ambassadors reportedly arrived at the April 2
meeting to find copies of ref C demarche sitting on their
otherwise empty desks.  The demarche was received badly
because it gave the impression that "big brother was
watching," and because it appeared timed as a heavyhanded and
hubristic attempt to influence the PSC, according to our UK
contact.  Some reps, led by Greek Ambassador
Paraskevoupoulos, objected to the Council Secretariat's
distribution of the demarche under Council Secretariat cover
and with a Secretariat identifying number.  He argued that
the document had no business being circulated by the
Secretariat, and insisted that it be stricken from EU 

SIPDIS
records.  Ambassadors also reacted against what they
perceived as the threatening tone of our demarche. 

3. (S/NF) The Financial Times' front page article on April 2
about the US demarche campaign also enflamed the Ambassadors
because it appeared directly aimed at Friday's PSC
discussion.  Irish Ambassador Kelleher reportedly opened the
meeting by waving the article in the air and imploring his
colleagues to protect the confidentiality of internal EU
deliberations.  Poloff pointed out that the timing of the
latest US demarche was a coincidence, as we were previously
unaware that the PSC was scheduled to discuss the issue on
that day.  (COMMENT: Our demarche was received badly not so
much because of its substance, but because of the way it was
presented.  Our UK contact faulted the Irish and the Council
Secretariat for the way the demarche was handled in the PSC, 

SIPDIS
and also the awkward timing that made it seem, along with the
FT article, tailor-made to influence the April 2 discussion.
END COMMENT). 

-----------------------------------------
National Positions: France versus Denmark
----------------------------------------- 

4. (S/NF) According to our UK contact, France staked out a
"zero flexibility" position on lifting the embargo, and is
opposed to any talk of applying conditionality (i.e. by
insisting on further human rights progress by China and/or
strengthening the Code of Conduct prior to lifting the
embargo).  The Danes are reportedly still leading the
opposition, and have circulated to EU partners a list of ten
human rights conditions that they believe China should meet
before the embargo is lifted (we have not yet obtained a copy
of this list).  Other EU Member States are lining up
somewhere in between, although "all agree in principle" that
the embargo should be lifted if certain conditions are met.
The debate from now on will focus on defining conditions and
timing. 

5. (S/NF) Following is a summary of national interventions
made at the April 2 PSC: 

-- France: The embargo is anachronistic and must go; willing
to discuss timing but not conditionality because China would
not accept human rights conditionality; likewise would be
contradictory to enhance the Code of Conduct specifically for
China while also lifting the embargo; opposed also to making
Code of Conduct legally binding; wants issue to remain
political; opposed to sending it down to working groups. 

-- Denmark: Any decision to lift the embargo must be linked
to specific Chinese steps on human rights; EU also needs to
review Code of Conduct to ensure that lifting the embargo
does not result in increased arms sales to China. 

-- Germany: EU must consider regional impact of lifting the
embargo; now is not a good time to lift embargo (COMMENT: The
Germans appear to have moved closer to the Danes in recent
weeks, and are now the largest EU member state with serious
reservations about lifting the embargo.  One report of the
discussion suggests that "the tough German position, coupled
with the strength of US views, might be tempering French
enthusiasm."  END COMMENT). 

-- UK: Should be further study by working groups to identify
implications for human rights and regional stability, and to
examine options for strengthening Code of Conduct (COMMENT:
Our Hungarian contact reports that the UK is fundamentally
closer to the French end of the spectrum than the Danish.
The UK, like France, does not favor making the Code of
Conduct legally binding.  END COMMENT). 

-- Greece: Should explore gestures China could make on human
rights without explicitly linking them to lifting the
embargo; should not link regional stability to lifting
embargo; "provocatively" proposed that the Code of Conduct be
made legally binding.  (COMMENT: Our contacts report that the
Greek position on lifting the embargo is closer to France
than any other Member State.  END COMMENT). 

-- Ireland: Supports sending the issue back to working groups
(in part to keep the EU from making any decision during its
Presidency). 

-- Netherlands: Central consideration should be possible
release of political prisoners from the 1989 Tiananmen
crackdown. 

-- Czech Republic: Supports French position that issue should
remain political; silent on other points (COMMENT: Our UK
contact said that the Czech position is generally understood
to be informed by that country's interest in selling radar
equipment to China, as described ref D.  END COMMENT). 

-- Sweden: Working groups should further study issues of
human rights, regional stability, and enhancing the Code of
Conduct. 

-- Austria: Should explore gestures on human rights that
China could make but avoid linkage to lifting the embargo;
should conduct a general (i.e. non China-specific) review of
Code of Conduct. 

-- Italy: Intervened with same points as Austria. 

-- Belgium: More discussion needed of implications, including
on human rights, of any decision to lift embargo. 

-- Commission: Took no position on lifting embargo but said
EU should remain focused on human rights. 

Other member states did not intervene in the PSC discussion. 

-------------------------------------
Timeline: Back to the Working Groups?
------------------------------------- 

6. (S/NF) The PSC will meet again on this issue on April 7,
when it is expected to approve an "issues paper" which will
then be sent through COREPER to FMs for discussion at the
April 26 GAERC.  According to our UK and Hungarian contacts,
the paper is intended as a tour d'horizon for the GAERC
discussion.  It will not contain recommendations, and FMs are
not expected to take a decision.  Instead, they will likely
send the paper back down to the PSC for re-examination.  Most
PSC Ambassadors, having satisfied the French desire for a
ministerial discussion in April, will then press France to
accept the majority preference for sending the issue back to
the working groups.  The working groups would need two to
three months, minimum, to complete their assessments and
submit their papers to the PSC (EU working groups are
comprised of capital-based experts who rarely meet more than
once per month).  The relevant working groups are COHUM
(human rights), COASI (Asia Directors), and COARM
(conventional arms exports). 

7. (S/NF) What all this means is that the debate will likely
continue well into the Dutch Presidency.  Already, Member
States are beginning to look toward the December EU-China
Summit as a possible timeframe for any decision to lift the
embargo.  We have heard they are also looking at the US
electoral calendar and quietly wondering whether it would be
worth holding off their decision until November or December
in the hopes of sneaking it past the US radar.  They have not
and will not discuss such issues openly, even amongst each
other in the PSC, but our UK contact confirms that quiet
conversations and suggestive comments are going on in the
wings. 

---------------------
Next Steps for the US
--------------------- 

8. (S/NF) Our efforts have managed to slow down the momentum
in favor of removing the arms embargo, but have not killed
this idea outright.  In addition to the ongoing diplomatic
dialogue on this issue, we recommend the following steps to
help us keep the pressure on European governments: 

-- We should coordinate closely with Japan, and perhaps also
the ROK.  According to numerous EU interlocutors, the
Japanese have become increasingly active on this issue, but
their efforts appear so far uncoordinated with our own.
While this may have served our interests in the sense that it
gave the Europeans the impression that Japan's concerns were
genuine and not dictated by Washington, it is now time to
begin coordinating our efforts, so that Europeans recognize
that other key players in the region share our regional
stability concerns. 

-- We should engage the European Parliament, and particularly
members of its Human Rights Committee.  The EP is already on
record opposing an end to the embargo.  By calling attention
to EU deliberations and ongoing Chinese human rights abuses,
the EP could increase the political heat on member state
governments against any decision to lift the embargo. 

-- We should consider increasing our public statements and
press briefings for European audiences, on the assumption
that more scrutiny by European publics would help our views
on this issue, especially as regards human rights. 

-- We should increase our engagement with institutional and
member state representatives to the COHUM, COASI and COARM
working groups.  In this way we could ensure that our views
on human rights, regional stability and the Code of Conduct
are fully understood by those experts who will be supplying
recommendations to the political groups for discussion. 

-- Additionally, as suggested ref B, we recommend the USG
begin considering options for how the EU might strengthen
controls on arms exports to China in a post-embargo scenario.
 The worst case for us would be for the EU to lift its
embargo without having in place some sort of new mechanism
for controlling the transfer of arms and sensitive
technologies to China. 

Schnabel

TOP-SECRET: CUBAN CRISIS 1961- ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS FROM THE ARCHIVES OF THE NATIONAL SECURIYT AGENCY (NSA)

operators_chatter

pilot_training_feb_1

pilot_training_june_19

radar_installed

soviet_arms

soviet_freighters

soviet_merchant_shipspanish_speaking_pilots

TOP-SECRET: Cuban Missile Crisis Document Archive – 1960 from the NSA Archives

soviet_arms

Afghanistan and the Soviet Withdrawal 1989 20 Years Later

Alexander Lyakhovsky

Washington D.C., July 31st 2011 – Twenty years ago today, the commander of the Soviet Limited Contingent in Afghanistan Boris Gromov crossed the Termez Bridge out of Afghanistan, thus marking the end of the Soviet war which lasted almost ten years and cost tens of thousands of Soviet and Afghan lives.

As a tribute and memorial to the late Russian historian, General Alexander Antonovich Lyakhovsky, the National Security Archive today posted on the Web (www.nsarchive.org) a series of previously secret Soviet documents including Politburo and diary notes published here in English for the first time.  The documents suggest that the Soviet decision to withdraw occurred as early as 1985, but the process of implementing that decision was excruciatingly slow, in part because the Soviet-backed Afghan regime was never able to achieve the necessary domestic support and legitimacy – a key problem even today for the current U.S. and NATO-supported government in Kabul.

The Soviet documents show that ending the war in Afghanistan, which Soviet general secretary Mikhail Gorbachev called “the bleeding wound,” was among his highest priorities from the moment he assumed power in 1985 – a point he made clear to then-Afghan Communist leader Babrak Karmal in their first conversation on March 14, 1985.  Already in 1985, according to the documents, the Soviet Politburo was discussing ways of disengaging from Afghanistan, and actually reached the decision in principle on October 17, 1985.

But the road from Gorbachev’s decision to the actual withdrawal was long and painful.  The documents show the Soviet leaders did not come up with an actual timetable until the fall of 1987.  Gorbachev made the public announcement on February 8, 1988, and the first troops started coming out in May 1988, with complete withdrawal on February 15, 1989.  Gorbachev himself, in his recent book (Mikhail Gorbachev, Ponyat’ perestroiku … Pochemu eto vazhno seichas. (Moscow: Alpina Books 2006)), cites at least two factors to explain why it took the reformers so long to withdraw the troops.  According to Gorbachev, the Cold War frame held back the Soviet leaders from making more timely and rational moves, because of fear of the international perception that any such withdrawal would be a humiliating retreat.  In addition to saving face, the Soviet leaders kept trying against all odds to ensure the existence of a stable and friendly Afghanistan with some semblance of a national reconciliation process in place before they left.

The documents detail the Soviet leadership’s preoccupation that, before withdrawal of troops could be carried out, the Afghan internal situation had to be stabilized and a new government should be able to rely on its domestic power base and a trained and equipped army able to deal with the mujahadeen opposition.  The Soviets sought to secure the Afghan borders through some kind of compromise with the two other most important outside players—Pakistan, through which weapons and aid reached the opposition, and the United States, provider of the bulk of that aid.  In the process of Geneva negotiations on Afghanistan, which were initiated by the United Nations in 1982, the United States, in the view of the Soviet reformers, was dragging its feet, unwilling to stop arms supplies to the rebels and hoping and planning for the fall of the pro-Soviet Najibullah regime after the Soviet withdrawal.

Internally, the People’s Democratic Party of Afghanistan did everything possible to prevent or slow down the Soviet withdrawal, putting pressure on the Soviet military and government representatives to expand military operations against the rebels.

Persistent pleading on the part of Najibullah government as late as January 1989 created an uncharacteristic split in the Soviet leadership, with Foreign Minister Eduard Shevardnadze suggesting that the withdrawal should be slowed down or some forces should remain to help protect the regime, while the military leadership argued strongly in favor of a complete and decisive withdrawal.

According to the American record, Shevardnadze had already informed Secretary of State George Shultz as early as September 1987 of the specific timetable for withdrawal.  But many senior officials did not believe the Soviet assurances; in fact, deputy CIA director Robert Gates famously bet a State Department diplomat on New Year’s Eve 1987 that Gorbachev would make no withdrawal announcement until after the end of the Reagan administration.  Gates believed the Chinese saying about the Soviet appetite for territory: “What the bear has eaten, he never spits out” – and only in his memoirs did he admit he was making “an intelligence forecast based on fortune cookie wisdom.”  (Robert Gates, From the Shadows: The Ultimate Insider’s Story of Five Presidents and How They Won the Cold War (New York:  Simon&Shuster, 1996, pp. 430-431).  Of course, Gates’ hardline views on Gorbachev would take over U.S. policy as the George H.W. Bush administration came into office in January 1989.

By this time, however, the Soviet leaders well realized that the goal of building socialism in Afghanistan was illusory; and at the same time the goal of securing the southern borders of the Soviet Union seemed to be still within reach with the policy of national reconciliation of the Najibullah government.  So the troops came out completely by February 15, 1989.  Soon after the Soviet withdrawal, however, both superpowers seemed to lose interest in what had been so recently the hottest spot of the Cold War.

Najibullah would outlast Gorbachev’s tenure in the Kremlin, but not by much:  Within three years Najibullah would be removed from power and brutally murdered, and Afghanistan would plunge into the darkness of civil war and the coming to power of the Taliban.  Twenty years later, the other superpower and its Cold War alliance are fighting a war in Afghanistan against forces of darkness that were born among the fundamentalist parts of mujahadeen resistance to the Soviet occupation.  In such a context, the language and the dilemmas in these 20-year-old documents still provide some resonance today.

This posting is also a tribute to and a commemoration of one of our long-standing partners in the pursuit of opening secrets and writing the new truly international history of the Cold War.   General Alexander Lyakhovsky passed away from a heart attack while standing on a Moscow Metro platform on February 3, 2009, less than two weeks before the 20th anniversary of the end of the war in which he served as an officer, and which he studied for many years as a scholar.  He is survived by his wife Tatyana and their children Vladimir and Galina.

The National Security Archive mourns the passing of our dear friend and partner, Alexander Antonovich.  It is fitting and proper that here we express our deepest appreciation for his remarkable knowledge, his scholarly and personal integrity, and his generosity both in expertise and the documents that he always shared with us, while he educated us and the world.  His memory lives on in all of us who ever read his work, heard him speak, or best of all, listened to him sing the sad songs of the Afghan war.

— Svetlana Savranskaya, director of Russia programs, Thomas Blanton, executive director, National Security Archive, and Malcolm Byrne, Deputy Director, National Security Archive.

Documents:

Document 1. Memorandum of Mikhail Gorbachev’s Conversation with Babrak Karmal, March 14, 1985

In his first conversation with the leader of Afghanistan, who was installed by the Soviet troops in December of 1979, Gorbachev underscored two main points: first that “the Soviet troops cannot stay in Afghanistan forever,” and second, that the Afghan revolution was presently in its “national-democratic” stage, whereas its socialist stage was only “a course of the future.” He also encouraged the Afghan leader to expand the base of the regime to unite all the “progressive forces.” In no uncertain terms, Karmal was told that the Soviet troops would be leaving soon and that his government would have to rely on its own forces.

Document 2.  Anatoly Chernyaev Diary, April 4, 1985

Chernyaev reflects on the “torrent of letters” about Afghanistan received recently by the Central Committee and the Pravda newspaper.  They reflect the growing dissatisfaction of the population with the drawn-out war and the consensus that the troops should be withdrawn.

Document 3 Anatoly Chernyaev Diary, October 17, 1985.

At the Politburo session of October 17, 1985, General Secretary Gorbachev proposed to make a final decision on Afghanistan and quoted from citizens’ letters regarding the dissatisfaction in the country with the Soviet actions in Afghanistan.  He also described his meeting with Babrak Karmal during which Gorbachev told the Afghan leader: “we will help you, but with arms only, not troops.”Chernyaev noted Gorbachev’s negative reaction to the assessment of the situation given by Defense Minister Marshal Sergey Sokolov.

Document 4.  Politburo Session, June 26, 1986.

The Politburo discusses the first results of Najibullah’s policy of national reconciliation.  Gorbachev emphasizes that the decision to withdraw the troops is firm, but that the United States seems to be a problem as far as the national reconciliation is concerned.  He proposes early withdrawals of portions of troops to give the process a boost, and proposes to “pull the USA and Pakistan by their tail” to encourage them to participate in it more actively.

Document 5 Politburo Session, November 13, 1986.

The first detailed Politburo discussion of the process and difficulties of the withdrawal of the Soviet troops from Afghanistan, which included the testimony of Marshal Sergei Akhromeev.

Document 6 Politburo Session, January 21, 1987

The Politburo discusses the results of Foreign Minister Eduard Shevardnadze and Head of the Central Committee International Department Anatoly Dobrynin’s trip to Afghanistan.  Shevardnadze’s report is very blunt and pessimistic about the war and the internal situation.  The main concern of the Politburo is how to end the war but save face and ensure a friendly and neutral Afghanistan.

Document 7 Politburo Session, February 23, 1987

Gorbachev talks about the need to withdraw while engaging the United States and Pakistan in negotiations on the final settlement.  He is willing to meet with the Pakistani leader Zia ul Khaq, and maybe even offer him some payoff.  The Soviet leader also shows concern about the Soviet reputation among non-aligned countries and national liberation movements.

Document 8 Politburo Session, February 26, 1987

In his remarks to the Politburo, General Secretary returns to the issue of the need to withdraw Soviet troops from Afghanistan several times.  He emphasizes the need to withdraw the troops, and at the same time struggles with the explanation for the withdrawal, noting that “we not going to open up the discussion about who is to blame now.”  Gromyko admits that it was a mistake to introduce the troops, but notes that it was done after 11 requests from the Afghan government.

Document 9  Colonel Tsagolov Letter to USSR Minister of Defense Dmitry Yazov on the Situation in Afghanistan, August 13, 1987

Criticism of the Soviet policy of national reconciliation in Afghanistan and analysis of general failures of the Soviet military mission there are presented in Colonel Tsagolov’s letter to USSR Defense Minister Dmitry Yazov of August 13, 1987.  This letter represents the first open criticism of the Afghan war from within the military establishment.  Colonel Tsagolov paid for his attempt to make his criticism public in his interview with Soviet influential progressive magazine “Ogonek” by his career—he was expelled from the Army in 1988.

Document 10  CC CPSU Letter on Afghanistan, May 10, 1988

On May 10, 1988, the Central Committee of the Communist Party of the USSR issued a “closed” (internal use) letter to all Communist Party members of the Soviet Union on the issue of withdrawal of troops from Afghanistan.  The letter presents the Central Committee analysis of events in Afghanistan and Soviet actions in that country, the problems and the difficulties the Soviet troops had to face in carrying out their mission.  In particular, the letter stated that important historic and ethnic factors were overlooked when the decisions on Afghanistan were made in the Soviet Union. The letter analyzes Soviet interests in Afghanistan and the reasons for the withdrawal of troops.

Document 11 Politburo Session January 24, 1989

This Politburo session deals with the issue of the completion of the withdrawal and the post-war Soviet role in Afghanistan, as well as possible future development of the situation there.  The discussion shows the split among the Soviet leadership with Foreign Minister Eduard Shevardnadze arguing for leaving some personnel behind to help protect the Najibullah regime or delaying the full withdrawal.

Document 12 Excerpt from Alexander Lyakhovsky and Vyacheslav Nekrasov, Grazhdanin, Politik, Voin: Pamyati Shakha Masuda (Citizen, Politician, Fighter: In Memory of Shah Masoud), (Moscow, 2007), pp. 202-205

Document 13  Excerpt from Statement of the Soviet Military Command in Afghanistan on the Withdrawal of Soviet Troops, February 14, 1989

On April 7, 1988, USSR Defense Minister signed an order on withdrawal of troops from Afghanistan.  In February 1989, the Defense Ministry prepared a statement of the Soviet Military Command in Afghanistan on the issue of withdrawal of troops, which was delivered to the Head of the UN Mission in Afghanistan on February 14, 1989—the day when the last Soviet soldier left Afghanistan.  The statement gave an overview of Soviet-Afghan relations before 1979, Soviet interpretation of the reasons for providing internationalist assistance to Afghanistan, and sending troops there after the repeated requests of the Afghan government.  It criticized the U.S. role in arming the opposition in disregard of the Geneva agreements, and thus destabilizing the situation in the country.  In an important acknowledgement that the Vietnam metaphor was used to analyze Soviet actions in Afghanistan, they military explicitly referred to “unfair and absurd” comparisons between the American actions in Vietnam and the presence of Soviet troops in Afghanistan.

Document 14. Official Chronology of the Soviet withdrawal from Afghanistan with quotes from documents from the Archive of the Gorbachev Foundation, Moscow.

Books By Alexander Lyakhovsky
Grazhdanin,Politik,Voin, Plamya Afgana and Zacharovannye svobodoj

 

CONFIDENTIAL: Lords of the Narco-Coast: Part II – Community Reaction

VZCZCXRO2713
RR RUEHAO RUEHCD RUEHGD RUEHHO RUEHMC RUEHNG RUEHNL RUEHRD RUEHRS
RUEHTM
DE RUEHMU #0013/01 0071743
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
R 071743Z JAN 10
FM AMEMBASSY MANAGUA
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 0368
INFO WESTERN HEMISPHERIC AFFAIRS DIPL POSTS
RHEFDIA/DIA WASHINGTON DC
RHEFHLC/DEPT OF HOMELAND SECURITY WASHINGTON DC
RHEHAAA/NATIONAL SECURITY COUNCIL WASHINGTON DC
RHMFISS/DEPT OF JUSTICE WASHINGTON DC
RHMFISS/HQ USSOUTHCOM MIAMI FL
RUCPDOC/DEPT OF COMMERCE WASHINGTON DC
RUEABND/DEA HQS WASHINGTON DC
RUEAIIA/CIA WASHINGTON DC
RUEHC/DEPT OF LABOR WASHINGTON DC
RUEHC/USAID WASHDC 0004
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 04 MANAGUA 000013 

SIPDIS
AMEMBASSY BRIDGETOWN PASS TO AMEMBASSY GRENADA
AMEMBASSY OTTAWA PASS TO AMCONSUL QUEBEC
AMEMBASSY BRASILIA PASS TO AMCONSUL RECIFE 

E.O. 12958: DECL: 2020/01/07
TAGS: SNAR SOCI ASEC PGOV PHUM PREL KCOR NU
SUBJECT: Lords of the Narco-Coast: Part II - Community Reaction
Divided, FSLN Blames U.S. for Crisis 

REF: A) 2009 MANAGUA 1149 (LORDS OF NARCO-COAST PART I)
B) 2009 MANAGUA 1051 (PRIMER ON MISKITO INDEPENDENCE MOVEMENT)
C) 2009 MANAGUA 1047 (MISKITO INDEPENDENCE RALLY TURNS DEADLY)
D) 2008 MANAGUA 1517 AND PREVIOUS (FRAUD IN RAAN ELECTIONS)
E) 2008 MANAGUA 419 AND PREVIOUS (GON SUSPENDS RAAN MUNICIPAL
ELECTIONS) 

CLASSIFIED BY: Robert J. Callahan, Ambassador; REASON: 1.4(A), (B),
(D) 

SUMMARY 

1. (C): On December 8, after a plane laden with cocaine and cash
crash-landed in the remote, small village of Walpa Siksa in the
North Atlantic Autonomous Region (RAAN), a deadly confrontation
took place between Nicaraguan anti-drug units and drug smugglers
allied with some number of local residents.  This message is the
second in a series that reports on the Walpa Siksa incident and its
immediate aftermath, and explores what these events have revealed
about the actual state of organized trafficking operations in
Nicaragua's Atlantic Coast. 

2.  (C) In the aftermath of the incident, public reactions have
been divided.  Some regional politicians and leaders of the
indigenous Yatama political party have called the incident and
subsequent government operations in the region a new "Red Christmas
Massacre" - a reference to the Sandinistas' deadly attacks on
indigenous Miskitos in the 1980s, assertions the military contests
are false.  Religious leaders have denounced these same political
leaders for turning a blind eye to the increased drug activity.
Former Vice President (and ex-Sandinista), Sergio Ramirez, has
decried the presence of trafficking organizations as a national
security threat, while a senior current FSLN official accused the
United States, specifically the CIA, of "promoting" the drug trade
to destabilize the country.  Underneath all lies a subtext of the
perennial rivalry and racial conflict between Nicaragua's Pacific
(Hispanic) and Atlantic (Afro-Caribbean and Amerindian) cultures.
Yet, also through the dissonance, the Walpa Siksa incident and its
aftermath seem to indicate stronger linkages between drug smugglers
and local communities in Nicaragua's Atlantic region than
previously believed.  END SUMMARY 

REGIONAL POLITICIANS BLAME THE MILITARY - SEEK A NEW CRISIS  

3. (C) The Walpa Siksa village, where the December 8 incident
occurred, is in a region historically controlled by Yatama; the
regional, indigenous Miskito political party.  Much of Yatama's
leadership itself has been co-opted by the ruling Sandinista Party
(REF D) over the last few years.  Even so, regional politicians and
several Yatama leaders have taken to the airwaves, primarily on
their new Yatama radio station (reportedly funded by the
government), to condemn the Nicaraguan military for its continuing
operations in the vicinity of Walpa Siksa and Prinzapolka.  These
leaders, including Brooklyn Rivera, a Yatama National Assembly
Deputy; Reynoldo Francis, Governor of the North Atlantic Autonomous
Region (RAAN); Roberto Wilson, the RAAN Vice Governor; and
Elizabeth Enriquez Francis, former mayor of RAAN capital Bilwi (and
ex-wife of Governor Francis), have used Miskito-language radio
broadcasts from the new station to claim that the Nicaraguan
anti-drug unit had violated human rights in pursuing its
investigation and by detaining suspects from Walpa Siksa.  These
leaders vehemently denied that these coastal communities support,
house and abet drug smugglers, as had been charged by some critics.
Rivera told national media that "the soldiers are all from the
Pacific coast.  There has been racism, robberies and looting of
indigenous people's homes."  Other Miskito leaders claim that the
soldiers have killed livestock and stolen food donated to the
community by the World Food Program. 

4. (C) Rivera, Francis, Wilson, and Enriquez have all called for
and even led several protests against police and navy forces
stationed in Bilwi, creating a new crisis in the region.  They have
denounced the "human rights violations" by the anti-drug unit
against the "innocent" indigenous people and claim that the
military "occupation" of Walpa Siksa is rife with abuses.  This
racially-charged agitation led some in the Miskito community to set
up illegal road blocks at the town of Sinsin, preventing traffic on
the only road between Bilwi and Managua.  There were also attempts
to take over the Bilwi International Airport and the capital's main
wharf.  These Yatama leaders and radicalized supporters have
demanded that the Navy cease all operations on the Atlantic Coast,
withdraw from the region, and immediately release the roughly two
dozen suspects detained in Walpa Siksa and Prinzapolka.  (see
SEPTEL).  Rivera also told reporters that the Walpa Siksa community
elders had decided to abandon their community if the military did
not depart or carried out its plan to establish a permanent
presence in the area. 

MORAVIAN CHURCH LEADER CONDEMNS GOVERNMENT COLLUSION 

5. (U) The Moravian Church is the largest denomination on the
Atlantic Coast and a large majority of indigenous Miskitos belong
to it, making the church the moral authority in the region; even
more so than the Catholic Church.  On Friday, December 13, Moravian
Church Superintendant Cora Antonio issued a grave statement against
the local Walpa Siksa community leaders, police officials and
military officials in the Atlantic, whom she claimed knew about the
narco-trafficking base in Walpa Siksa, but took no action until the
recent plane crash.  Antonio, who will finish her two-year term in
January 2010, complained that drug smugglers had established their
networks unchallenged by the GON and exploited the extreme poverty
on the Coast.  She also claimed that elected officials, including
Francis, Wilson, and Lidia Coleman, the mayor of nearby
Prinzapolka, as well as police and military authorities, "knew from
the beginning of the installation of this narco-traffickers' base,
but never did anything about it."   She also stated that in certain
Caribbean communities the narco-traffickers exercised the highest
authority, above that of the community judge, the village elders,
even the pastor or "sindico," and that they frequently commanded
the "last word" on community decisions.  Antonio also said the
Moravian Church had recently removed a reverend from the Walpa
Siksa village out of fear that he would be physically attacked for
preaching against drugs from the pulpit. 

WIHTA TARA ALSO SAYS MILITARY SHOULD LEAVE 

6. (U) Other non-FSLN-aligned indigenous leaders took aim at the
President Ortega and at the military's recent actions.  The Wihta
Tara of the Miskito Nation, aka the Rev. Hector Williams, who
denounced the Managua government and called for Miskito
independence, told the media that Columbian drug traffickers had
already left, so the military should leave as well.  NOTE: The
Wihta Tara (Miskito for "great judge"), was elected by the Council
of Elders of the Miskito Nation and leads Miskito separatist
movement that mounted protests which were violently suppressed this
past October (REF E)  END NOTE.   Williams stated that "the army is
after the money that they think is hidden in the community."
Building on the racial inequality theme, another separatist leader,
Steady Alvarado, publicly questioned why the military felt it could
take actions in the indigenous communities that it would never
attempt on the Pacific Coast.  The Miskito Council of Elders itself
issued a statement on December 12 blaming President Ortega directly
for the "tortures, persecutions and death of our community members
in Walpa Siksa."  It also accused Ortega of being "incapable of
neutralizing" drug trafficking activity on the Atlantic Coast, and
for again "bearing a grudge" against the Coastal peoples, "like he
did during the Navidad Roja (Red Christmas Massacre)."  NOTE: The
Red Christmas Massacre occurred in 1981, when Sandinista military
operations in the Atlantic Coast killed dozens and forcibly
relocated hundreds of Miskitos thought to be collaborating with the
Contras. END NOTE. 

ARMY CHIEF DENIES RIGHTS VIOLATIONS - YIELD "NOT ONE INCH TO
NARCOS" 

7. (U) General Omar Halleslevens, Commander of the Nicaraguan
military, told reporters that the Army would not leave Walpa Siksa,
nor would it stop searching neighboring communities for drug
traffickers.  He insisted that the Army would remain and would take
appropriate measures to protect the area from again becoming a
haven for drug trafficking.  Halleslevens denied accusations that
the military had violated human rights, saying "our line has been
from the very beginning to respect life, human rights, private
property and the law ... as we are completing our duty to support
the police in applying the law."  He further declared that the
military would "not give a rock, nor even an inch of the national
territory, to narco-traffickers" and called on government
institutions and the population to support law enforcement in its
fight.  NOTE: Thus far, Post has no/no credible evidence of human
rights violations by law enforcement related to this operation.  We
continue to monitor the situation closely and will report relevant
developments if they occur.  END NOTE. 

FORMER FSLN VICE PRESIDENT CONDEMNS NARCOS, BLAMES GOVERNMENT 

8. (U) Adding to the chorus of concern about the absentee national
government was author and former Nicaraguan/FSLN vice president,
Sergio Ramirez, who said in an op-ed that the strong
narco-traffickers presence on the Caribbean Coast threatened
Nicaragua's sovereignty and territorial integrity.  He believed
that the "narco-traffickers will promote the separation of the
Caribbean Coast (REF E) and already have the social base to do it"
because of the significant resources drug smugglers enjoy and the
rampant political corruption in the region.  Ramirez also said the
confrontation between the anti-drug units and the Walpa Siksa
community demonstrated that criminal organizations had achieved
enormous influence on the Atlantic Coast while the "government does
not do anything to stop the problem." 

FSLN LEADER BLAMES THE U.S., CIA FOR THE CRISIS, MAY CANCEL
ELECTIONS 

9. (U) In contrast, during December 16 interviews, Steadman Fagoth,
a Miskito indigenous leader, former Contra commander, and now
ardent Ortega supporter, told FSLN-controlled media that United
States had created the Walpa Siksa crisis.  Fagoth, who is also
president of the Government's Fishing Authority (INPESCA), spoke to
Multinoticias Channel 4, owned and operated by the Ortega-Murillo
family, and to "El 19," the official on-line newspaper of the
Sandinista Government.  He claimed that the United States, through
the CIA, was trying to provoke an uprising in the Atlantic Coast
against the government by supporting narco-criminals.  He added
that Alberto Luis Cano, the fugitive Colombian drug leader and
passenger of the crashed drug airplane (see SEPTEL-Part I) had been
hired by the CIA to promote an uprising among the native
population, by playing on the racial animosity between Nicaragua's
Pacific and Atlantic populations.  Perhaps Fagoth's most troubling
comment was that because of the current unrest, the government
might delay regional elections scheduled for March 2010.  

COMMENT 

10. (C) In the cacophony following the Walpa Siksa incident,
statements of FSLN official Steadman Fagoth are perhaps the most
politically ominous.  Fagoth is a regular proxy for Ortega's
Atlantic policy.  His remarks frequently represent test balloons
for how Ortega perceives the situation and how the President seeks
to position himself against any fallout.  Fagoth's anti-U.S.
accusations are outrageous, but not unexpected -- that the United
States and CIA employed a drug trafficker to created this crisis,
destabilize the region and overthrow the government.  He made
similar accusations about the United States and CIA when the Wihta
Tara announced the separatist movement several months ago.  In
2008, the GON delayed RAAN municipal elections (REF E) on dubious
grounds.  Thus Fagoth's comment about delaying the March 2010
regional elections may indicate Ortega's true intent: freeze
everyone in place. 

11. (C) The Walpa Siksa incident and its aftermath aggravated
underlying tensions and divisions that persist in the Atlantic, and
may have exposed new evidence about the nature and extend of
narco-trafficking activity.  Serious concerns about threats to
national security and sovereignty have been raised by critics of
the government.  Some community leaders, such as Moravian
Superintendent Cora Antonio, have spoken out about what they see as
rampant drug corruption and political collusion by RAAN political
leaders.  We find it odd that these same political leaders, such as
Rivera, Francis, Wilson and Enriquez agitated against military
counter-drug operations, and virtually denied the existence of any
narco-trafficking activity.  At a minimum, their efforts to fan
latent racial resentments seem self-serving re-election efforts in
the run-up to regional elections.  For its part, the military
denies any human rights abuses in this, its largest anti-drug land
operation in the Caribbean in years.  In a subsequent message we
will provide more detail about the figures caught up in the Walpa
Siksa incident and outline some of the networks and relationships
that we believe traffickers may have been able to establish.
CALLAHAN

CONFIDENTIAL: Lords of the Narco-Coast: Part I – Deadly Confrontation

VZCZCXRO2201
RR RUEHAO RUEHCD RUEHGD RUEHHO RUEHMC RUEHNG RUEHNL RUEHRD RUEHRS
RUEHTM
DE RUEHMU #1149/01 3552241
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
R 212241Z DEC 09
FM AMEMBASSY MANAGUA
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 0312
INFO WESTERN HEMISPHERIC AFFAIRS DIPL POSTS
RHEFDIA/DIA WASHINGTON DC
RHEFHLC/DEPT OF HOMELAND SECURITY WASHINGTON DC
RHEHAAA/NATIONAL SECURITY COUNCIL WASHINGTON DC
RHMFISS/DEPT OF JUSTICE WASHINGTON DC
RHMFISS/HQ USSOUTHCOM MIAMI FL
RUCPDOC/DEPT OF COMMERCE WASHINGTON DC
RUEABND/DEA HQS WASHINGTON DC
RUEAIIA/CIA WASHINGTON DC
RUEHC/DEPT OF LABOR WASHINGTON DC
RUEHC/USAID WASHDC 0001
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 03 MANAGUA 001149 

SIPDIS
AMEMBASSY BRIDGETOWN PASS TO AMEMBASSY GRENADA
AMEMBASSY OTTAWA PASS TO AMCONSUL QUEBEC
AMEMBASSY BRASILIA PASS TO AMCONSUL RECIFE 

E.O. 12958: DECL: 2019/12/21
TAGS: SNAR SOCI PGOV PHUM PREL KCOR ASEC NU
SUBJECT: Lords of the Narco-Coast: Part I - Deadly Confrontation at
Walpa Siksa 

REF: MANAGUA 1051 (MOSQUITO COAST INDEPENDENCE) 

CLASSIFIED BY: Robert J. Callahan, Ambassador, State, Embassy
Managua; REASON: 1.4(A), (B), (D) 

1. (C) SUMMARY: On December 8, after a plane laden with cocaine and
cash crash landed in the remote, small village of Walpa Siksa in
the North Atlantic Autonomous Region (RAAN), a deadly confrontation
took place between Nicaraguan anti-drug units and drug smugglers
allied with a some number of local residents.  Stories of how the
clash came to pass on December 8 are divergent, but the Walpa Siksa
incident,  the ensuing actions of regional leaders and local
residents, as well as the enhanced posture of security forces seems
to indicate there are stronger linkages between drug smugglers and
local communities than previously believed.  This message is the
first in a series that reports on the Walpa Siksa incident and its
immediate aftermath, and explores what these events have revealed
about the actual state of organized trafficking operations in
Nicaragua's Atlantic Coast.  END SUMMARY 

WALPA SIKA: THE OFFICIAL ACCOUNT 

2. (C) On Tuesday, December 8, a Nicaraguan anti-drug unit clashed
with suspected drug traffickers, leaving two sailors dead and five
other government security forces wounded.  The following account of
events is based on Government of Nicaragua (GON) official briefings
and conversations between senior GON law enforcement/military
officials and Embassy personnel.  On Tuesday, December 8, a
Nicaraguan anti-drug unit combined force of navy and national
police traveled to the remote, small village of Walpa Siksa in the
North Atlantic Autonomous Region (RAAN) to investigate reports of a
plane crash linked to drug smugglers.  The joint patrol arrived in
the evening and was ambushed by civilians from the remote village,
who were allegedly defending the drug traffickers.  In the melee,
two sailors were killed, and three other military personnel and one
police officer were severely wounded.  One villager from Walpa
Siksa was also killed.  On Wednesday, December 9, a joint
Nicaraguan navy-army patrol returned to Walpa Siksa to detain those
suspected of involvement in the ambush, only to find the community
abandoned of all males.  On Thursday, December 10, anti-drug forces
from the Navy confronted an additional group of drug smugglers near
the community of Prinzapolka, in which one suspect was killed and
another wounded.  Two more were detained, and the fifth suspect
escaped.  Subsequent missions by the anti-drug unit over several
days resulted in 20 suspects arrested (18 in connection with the
first clash), and confiscation of a powerboat, several guns,
ammunition, small quantities of drugs and $177,960 in cash.
Nicaraguan security forces have seized and are now operating out of
several homes in the Walpa Siksa community that are believed to
have housed drug smugglers.  The military has announced plans to
establish a permanent presence in the area to discourage drug
traffickers from using it as a base of operations any longer. 

3. (U) Capt. Roger Gonzalez, newly-installed chief of the
Nicaraguan naval forces, told the press that "we understand there
is a Colombian criminal, suspected drug trafficker, [Alberto Ruiz
Cano] who has $500,000 and has armed certain area individuals, and
we are searching for him."  Police investigators revealed that Ruiz
Cano, whose real name is Amauri Pau, was illegally issued a
Nicaraguan national identity card (cedula) and owns several
properties and businesses in Managua believed to be involved in
money laundering (see SEPTEL).  Ruiz Cano is also believed to have
been on the crashed plane and is suspected of leading the December
8 attack against the anti-drug unit.  Officials detained two
Colombians -- Ruiz Cano's father [Fernando Melendez Paudd known as
"el Patron"] and his cousin [Catalina del Carmen Ruiz] -- but
neither has been willing to talk to police about Ruiz Cano or his
whereabouts.  Ruiz Cano's associates have hired attorney Julian
Holmes Arguello to defend them.  The presence of Holmes Arguello, a
well-known and expensive attorney, has reinforced official
suspicions about Holmes own possible drug connections. 

WALPA SIKSA: EYE-WITNESS ACCOUNTS -- EARLY "WHITE" CHRISTMAS OR
FAILED DRUG RESCUE? 

4. (U) The national daily newspaper El Nuevo Diario "END"
(left-of-center) has provided continuous coverage of the Walpa
Siksa incident, since it came to light on the evening of December
8th.  According to the paper's accounts, events leading up to the
deadly December 8 firefight differ somewhat from the official
account.  The paper's sources, who requested anonymity for fear of
possible reprisals from traffickers, other residents and the
government, stated that the plane crash-landed in the Walpa Siksa
cemetery on Sunday, December 6 at 11 a.m.  The impact killed the
pilot and co-pilot instantly, and broke the plane into several
pieces scattering packets of cocaine and bundles of dollars in the
debris.  Walpa Siksa residents quickly discovered the dead pilots
and one crash survivor, to whom they gave medical attention.  They
were also surprised at the large quantity of cocaine the plane was
carrying.  According to the paper's sources, some community elders
wanted to immediately contact the police and navy about the plane
crash and drugs, but others argued that it would be better to
divide the cash and drugs within the community and then burn the
plane to hide the evidence.  According to the media reports, the
latter group prevailed and armed themselves with weapons (pistols,
AK-47 rifles) that had been stored since the 1980's.  According to
the eye-witness accounts, on December 7 at 2 p.m. two boats with
approximately 40 Colombian narco-traffickers, who were "armed to
the teeth," arrived in Walpa Siksa to rescue the pilots and the
third passenger (known as "el Jefe" or "the boss," believed to be
Alberto Ruiz Cano), and to recover the plane's lost "merchandise."
The Colombians spent the night of December 7 and all day December 8
trying to convince the community to return the missing drugs and
cash.  According to END reports, when the narco-traffickers learned
that a government anti-drug unit was coming from Bilwi to
investigate the plane crash, they armed the community in order to
repel the Navy.  As soon as the two Navy boats arrived, the
narco-traffickers opened fire on the sailors, who also shot back,
killing four community members [NOTE: only one death in the
community has been confirmed. END NOTE].  The navy boats returned
to Bilwi at 7 p.m. with their dead and wounded.  On December 9, the
wounded civilians from Walpa Siksa were taken to a nearby village
and, by the afternoon, the Walpa Siksa village was evacuated
because villagers feared reprisals by the Government. 

5. (C) Our Embassy contacts on the ground in the RAAN have relayed
an account similar to that reported in the newspaper, but that
differs on some important details.  According to our sources, on
Friday, December 4, an airplane carrying hundreds of pounds of
cocaine and sacks of cash ran out of fuel on its way to a
clandestine runway in the RAAN and was forced to make an emergency
landing on the beach near Walpa Siksa.  The plane's pilot and two
passengers, allegedly Colombians, suffered minor injuries and were
sheltered by the local community.  Members of the community quickly
emptied the airplane of its cargo, estimated to be approximately a
half-ton of cocaine separated into individual one kilo packets.
Our contacts told us that word of the plane crash quickly spread
throughout the coastal communities and on Saturday morning,
December 5, several local merchants left Bilwi with their boats
full of commercial goods and food to sell to the community with its
sudden new windfall.  By Saturday evening narco-trafficker "rescue
boats" carrying approximately 40 Colombians and Hondurans
(reportedly from Honduras and San Andres) arrived in the community
to save the pilot/passengers and recover the drugs and cash.  Over
the ensuing three days, village elders urged by the narco "recovery
team" tried to persuade the community to sell the cocaine packets
back at a price of $3,000 a kilo.  According to our contacts, the
major sticking point was that the $3,000 price was only half the
$6,000 per kilo price that locals knew they could get by taking
their windfall slightly up the coast to Honduras.  When one group
of Walpa Siksa residents ultimately refused to sell back their
stash to the narco-traffickers, they were attacked and robbed of
their "windfall."  This group subsequently traveled to Bilwi on the
morning of Tuesday, December 8, and filed a formal complaint with
the police there, which confirmed rumors of a drug-plane crash.
Our contacts told us that it was this formal complaint that lead to
the government dispatching the counter-drug unit to investigate at
Walpa Siksa.  The anti-drug unit arrived in two boats to Walpa
Siksa at approximately 6 p.m.  Our contacts told us that there had
been no ambush when they arrived, but rather an "amicable" meeting
between law enforcement and village elders.  However, things turned
sour after one of the Colombians from the "rescue team," who was
drunk and under the impression they were under attack, shot his
automatic weapon into the group of uniformed sailors, killing one
and seriously wounding several other counter-drug unit members.
Our contacts told us that the "ambush" story was fabricated later
by authorities to account for their dead and wounded. 

COMMENT 

6. (C) Walpa Siksa has obliged us to revise our views about the
nature and extent of trafficking activity on the Atlantic.
Previously, our assessment had been that the majority of the local
indigenous Miskito villages were too xenophobic to actively support
outsiders (even Nicaraguans from the Pacific side of Hispanic
descent) in transporting drugs (or, frankly, any other activity)
for extended periods.  We had also believed that local interaction
with traffickers had been intermittent, and normally took place
upon the instruction or advice of a small number of corrupt
political and indigenous leaders in the region.  We maintain our
basic assessment is still valid; however, all three versions of the
Walpa Siksa incident reveal evidence that there is likely a much
higher degree of cooperation and support than we previously
believed between foreign drug trafficking organization and, at
least, the more remote local communities of Nicaragua's Atlantic
Coast.  In some cases there may be persistent and pervasive
relationships within an entire community.  We fear that it now
appears that organized criminal elements may have made major
inroads within some remote coastal communities, convincing them to
join forces by offering perhaps the only secure and steady
employment opportunity on the Coast - maintaining drug trafficking
supply routes.  Nicaragua's Atlantic is a key mid-point for an
increasingly busy transit corridor of South American drug shipments
bound for the United States.  It is also the most underdeveloped
and economically backward region of the country and has been
generally ignored by the current and previous central governments
in Managua.  This combination of political neglect, limited
economic opportunity and daily shipments of drugs creates
conditions for a possible "perfect storm" where Nicaragua's
Atlantic Coast could degenerate into an ungoverned "Narco-Coast,"
with serious repercussions for Nicaragua's political stability and
U.S. counternarcotics cooperation.  In subsequent messages we will
address reaction to Walpa Siksa by local, regional and national
figures.  We will also provide more detailed reporting about the
key figures caught up in the Walpa Siksa incident and outline some
of the networks and relationships that we believe traffickers have
been able to establish.
CALLAHAN

CONFIDENTIAL: BULGARIA AND THE ENERGY KNOT: SCENESETTER FOR OCT

VZCZCXRO6805
OO RUEHFL RUEHKW RUEHLA RUEHROV RUEHSR
DE RUEHSF #0641/01 2761002
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
O 021002Z OCT 08
FM AMEMBASSY SOFIA
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 5430
INFO RUEHZL/EUROPEAN POLITICAL COLLECTIVE PRIORITY
RUCPDOC/DEPT OF COMMERCE WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY
RHEBAAA/DEPT OF ENERGY WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY
RUEAIIA/CIA WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY
RHEHAAA/NATIONAL SECURITY COUNCIL WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 03 SOFIA 000641 

SIPDIS 

FOR SPECIAL ENVOY BOYDEN GRAY 

E.O. 12958: DECL: 09/30/2018
TAGS: ECON ENRG PGOV BU
SUBJECT: BULGARIA AND THE ENERGY KNOT: SCENESETTER FOR OCT
7 VISIT OF SPE GRAY 

Classified By: Ambassador Nancy McEldowney for reasons 1.4. (b) and (d)
. 

1.  (C)  Summary:  The quandary over energy facing all our
European partners is particularly acute here in Bulgaria.
With few hydrocarbons of its own, Bulgaria relies on Russia
for seventy percent of its total energy needs and over ninety
percent of its gas.  Though previously a net exporter of
electricity, the EU's decision to force closure of blocks 3
and 4 of the communist-era nuclear plant Kozluduy cost the
Bulgarian economy over USD 1.4 billion and put a squeeze on
Serbia, Macedonia and Greece, who had purchased the bulk of
the exports.  The hard reality of today's energy picture is
that Russia is not only the dominant supplier, it is also the
dominant player -- your visit here is the first by a senior
U.S. energy official in a year, whereas Putin has personally
engaged both the President and Prime Minister on energy
issues in multiple sessions over the past ten months.  But
the cartoon strip portraying a passionately eager Bulgaria in
bed with the muscle bound duo of Gazprom and Lukoil is only
partially true -- it is a tryst driven less by passion and
more by a perceived lack of options.  Prime Minister
Stanishev recently described Russian tactics on South Stream
as blackmail and Energy Minister Dimitrov complains openly of
psychological warfare.  At the same time, the Bulgarians are
deeply worried about the prospects for Nabucco and are
convinced that Azeri gas supplies will be held up by Turkey.
Their bid to hold an energy summit in the spring, the
ostensible focus of your visit, is designed to catalyze
greater coordination -- and negotiating leverage -- amongst
transit countries while also getting the United States more
actively engaged.  Background on specific issues likely to
arise in your discussions with President Parvanov, Prime
Minister Stanishev, Foreign Minister Kalfin and Energy
Minister Dimitrov follows below.  End Summary. 

TIMING
------ 

2.  (C)  Your visit to Sofia comes when Bulgaria is striving
to sell itself as a European energy center.  With six active
or potential pipelines transiting the country, the creation
of a new energy mega-holding company, and the construction of
a new nuclear plant, Bulgaria is setting itself up to be an
important regional energy player, despite being overly
dependent on Russian energy sources.  The proposal to host a
major gas summit in April 2009 -- which Putin has already
promised to attend -- is the latest attempt to put Bulgaria
on the energy map.  Your visit will guide the Bulgarians as
they formulate an agenda and goals for this summit.  It will
also focus Bulgarian policy makers on U.S. views on Russian
energy strategy and South Stream, answer growing skepticism
about Nabucco's prospects, and give solid counter-arguments
to those who say there is no real alternative to dependence
on Russian energy. 

THE SUMMIT
---------- 

3.  (C)  At the January 19 signing of the South Stream
Intergovernmental Agreement, President Parvanov, with Putin
at his side, announced Bulgaria would host an energy summit
intended as a follow-on to the June 2007 Zagreb energy
conference.  Upon Putin's departure, Sofia fell under heavy
criticism both at home and abroad for hastily joining South
Stream, and the energy summit idea lost steam.  Ambassador
for Energy Security Peter Poptchev told us the Bulgarians
resented perceived Russian pressure to hold such a summit.
In July the Bulgarians independently resurrected the summit
idea as a way to show Bulgarian support for Nabucco and
diversification, as well to balance European, U.S. and
Russian interests in the Caspian and Black Sea regions.  With
the potential for six pipelines passing through its
territory, the Bulgarians also have high hopes to become a
regional energy hub.  The summit, they believe, will help put
Sofia on the map not only as an energy center, but as a place
that brokers discussions between the West, Russia and
Eurasia. 

4.  (C)  The Bulgarians requested your visit to advise on the
summit.  They envision a spring conference (tentatively April
24-25) that would bring together heads of state from Eurasian
and European producer, transit and consumer countries.  PM
Stanishev told Ambassador September 19 that Putin has agreed
to attend.  The summit will be gas-focused and will attempt
to put "real solutions" on sources, routes and quantities on
the table.  Well-aware of the potential for East European
energy conference fatigue in the first half of 2009, the
Bulgarians are proposing that all key participants, including
the EU, the United States and Russia, view the proposed
Hungarian, Bulgarian and Czech conferences as a linked
continuum.  The April Sofia conference would take care of any
unfinished business left from the January Hungary Conference
and the proposed Czech conference would take up where the
Sofia conference leaves off.  To distinguish the Bulgarian
summit, Sofia is considering including an as-yet undeveloped
"industry component." 

5.  (C)  The Bulgarians will seek U.S. views and your advice
on the proposed agenda of the summit and whether it will
advance U.S. goals in the region.  They want recommendations
on how to coordinate the Hungarian, Bulgarian and Czech
conferences and may seek advice on the proposed industry
component of the Sofia summit.  They are interested in, but
may not ask directly about, U.S. views on whether Sofia has a
future as an intermediary between Europe, the United States
and Russia on energy and other issues affecting the Black Sea
region.  They are interested in your analysis of recent Azeri
and Turkish energy moves.  They will also request high level
U.S. attendance at the summit. 

BULGARIAN ENERGY PROJECTS
-------------------------- 

6.  (C)  SOUTH STREAM:  The Bulgarians signed the South
Stream intergovernmental agreement in January and Parliament
ratified the agreement in July.  Negotiations between
Bulgargaz and Gazprom resumed in September to work out a
pre-shareholders agreement.  At our recommendation, and at
the direction of the Government, state-owned Bulgargaz
reluctantly hired outside legal counsel (the U.S. law firm
Paul Hastings) to represent it in South Stream negotiations.
With the creation of a new, state-owned energy mega-holding
in September, Bulgargaz has lost much of its
previously-considerable independence.  The acting head of the
Bulgarian Energy Holding is Deputy Energy Minister Galina
Tosheva, previously lead South Stream negotiator for the
Bulgarian Government.  Tosheva has a healthy suspicion of
Russia's intentions in Bulgaria and has directed Bulgargaz to
rely on its legal counsel for expert advice.  Tosheva told us
that Gazprom negotiators are taking a hard line now that
negotiations have resumed.  They are proposing to re-route
gas currently transiting Bulgaria (for which Bulgartransgas
makes a healthy profit) to South Stream, meaning South Stream
would not represent 31 bcm of new gas for Europe, but
something significantly lower.  The Bulgarians state that
this is contrary to the spirit of the IGA and are preparing
to fight the Russian proposal. 

7.  (C)  NABUCCO:  Despite the strong public support they
have shown Nabucco this year, the Bulgarians are turning into
Nabucco-skeptics.  In March, Sofia signed what it thought was
an agreement for Azerbaijan to supply 1 bcm of gas that
Bulgaria would eventually take as its Nabucco quota.  In
advance of Nabucco, Bulgaria planned to access the gas via a
potential hook-up to the Turkey-Greece-Italy interconnector.
Realizing now that the agreement was not, in fact, a
commitment on Azerbaijan's part, the Bulgarians feel burned.
The government is now in dire need of a pep talk on the
Nabucco.  They state firmly that both South Stream and
Nabucco are critical and that one cannot be allowed to
preclude the other.  At the same time, they are nervous about
both Azerbaijani willingness to supply Nabucco and Turkish
willingness to support the project.  They will be interested
in your view of Nabucco's prospects. 

8.  (C)  TGI HOOK-UP:  The Bulgarians are in negotiations
with Greece about this possible interconnector.  Energy
Holding CEO Tosheva said this is Bulgaria's most immediate
source of diversification and energy security.  The Greeks
apparently are cool to the idea, saying there is insufficient
gas.  In response, the Bulgarians have proposed the purchase
of LNG to be delivered to Greece in exchange for either TGI
access or gas currently going through the export pipeline
from Russia and transiting Bulgarian territory.  Your
Bulgarian interlocutors may ask for U.S. support for these
schemes in our discussions with the Greeks and Turks. 

9.  (C)  BURGAS-ALEXANDROUPOLIS (BAP) and AMBO:  The
Bulgarians, Russians and Greeks signed a shareholders
agreement for the BAP oil pipeline in January during the
Putin visit.  Since then, the project company has been
registered, but little more progress has been made.  The
Bulgarians are still confident the pipeline will be built,
and seem surprisingly uninterested in the dynamics
surrounding CPC expansion.  With BAP's relative progress, the
AMBO (Albania-Macedonia-Bulgaria) oil pipeline project has
lost momentum.  Still, Bulgaria remains committed to AMBO and
is ready to move forward if and when AMBO attracts supply and
financing. 

10.  (C)  BELENE:  In 2006 the GOB selected Russian
AtomstroyExport as the contractor for the new Belene nuclear
plant.  Bulgaria is keeping majority ownership of the plant,
but is in the process of selecting a strategic investor for
the other 49 percent.  RWE and the Belgian Electrabel are in
the running.  We have stated repeatedly that the choice of a
Russian contractor for Belene decreased Bulgaria's bid for
greater independence from Russian energy sources.  The lack
of transparency surrounding the tender has led to the
inescapable conclusion that the decision to choose Russia as
the Belene contractor was linked to the re-negotiation of
Bulgaria's long-term gas transit contract with Gazprom in
December 2006. 

YOUR MEETINGS
------------- 

11.  (C)  President Parvanov began his second five-year term
in 2007.  Parvanov's desire to exercise behind-the-scenes
influence over the government has led to tensions with his
former protege, Prime Minister Sergei Stanishev.  Parvanov
has close ties to Russian politicians and held no less than
eight meetings with Vladimir Putin in the last seven years.
The energy summit will be under his aegis. 

--Prime Minister Sergei Stanishev is a 42-year-old
progressive Socialist.  He is pro-west and eager to have
Bulgaria viewed as a good friend and partner of the United
States.  He returned September 30 from a week-long visit to
the United States where he met with U/S Burns, spoke at the
Harvard Business School and held an investment forum.  He
understands that Bulgaria is overly dependent on Russian
energy sources, but sees Bulgaria as having few options for
greater energy independence. 

--Foreign Minister Kalfin is close to both Stanishev and
Parvanov and as Deputy Prime Minister oversees the Economy
and Energy Ministry.  He is a strong supporter of close
Bulgarian-U.S. relations and is highly conversant on energy
issues. 

--Economy and Energy Minister Petar Dimitrov is a relative
new-comer to energy issues.  He is largely seen as taking
direction on energy matters from former Energy Minister Rumen
Ovcharov, who is linked with Russian energy interests and
left office in June 2007 after a corruption scandal. 

12.  (C)  Your visit will also highlight, though meetings and
press outreach, the need for Bulgaria to focus on a long-term
energy strategy not solely based on the transit of
hydrocarbons or the production of Russian-based nuclear
energy, but on the development of renewables, clean coal and
greater energy efficiency.  Bulgaria will always be dependent
on Russian energy to one extent or another. But as the most
energy inefficient economy in Europe, it can make meaningful
strides toward greater diversity away from Russian energy
sources.  With the price of energy at near record highs,
Russia's hydrocarbon-generated wealth is increasingly
circulating through the Bulgarian economy, making Bulgaria
all the more susceptible to Russian leverage.  An energy
strategy that focuses on renewables and efficiency is one
tool Bulgaria can use to put a noticeable dent in negative
Russian influence.  The other tool is transparency.  Hub
status in any industry is bestowed only on places which offer
transparent, efficient service.  To achieve its goal of
becoming a true energy center, we should recommend that
Bulgaria present itself not as the place with closest ties to
Russia, but as the most transparent place to do energy deals. 

McEldowney

STRENG VERTRAULICHES DOKUMENT DER DEUTSCHEN BAHN ZUR NEUPOSITIONIERUNG

VERTRAULICHES ABLAUFKONZEPT DER LOVEPARADE 15.1.2010S

loveparade2010_loveparade-2010-anlage-19-vertrauliches-ablaufkonzept-15-01-10

CONFIDENTIAL: VATICAN WARY OF LEFTIST LATINOS

VZCZCXRO4957
RR RUEHAO RUEHCD RUEHFL RUEHGA RUEHGD RUEHHA RUEHHO RUEHKW RUEHLA
RUEHMC RUEHNG RUEHNL RUEHQU RUEHRD RUEHRG RUEHRS RUEHSR RUEHTM RUEHVC
DE RUEHROV #0562/01 3571109
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
R 231109Z DEC 05
FM AMEMBASSY VATICAN
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 0207
INFO RUEHWH/WESTERN HEMISPHERIC AFFAIRS DIPL POSTS
RUEHZL/EUROPEAN POLITICAL COLLECTIVE
RUEHROV/AMEMBASSY VATICAN 0232
TAGS: PGOV PHUM KIRF PREL VT MX VE
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 VATICAN 000562 

SIPDIS 

SIPDIS 

DEPT FOR EUR/WE LARREA 

E.O. 12958: DECL:  12/23/2015
TAGS: PGOV PHUM KIRF PREL VT MX VE
SUBJECT: VATICAN WARY OF LEFTIST LATINOS
 REF: A. REFS: A) LARREA-MARTIN EMAIL; B) CARACAS 3757; C) VATICAN 551 ET AL.; D) VATICAN 552 

     B. A) LARREA - MARTIN 12/9 EMAIL; B) CARACAS 3757; C) VATICAN 551 ET AL.;
D) VATICAN 552 

VATICAN 00000562  001.2 OF 002 

CLASSIFIED BY: Peter Martin, Pol/Econ Chief, Vatican, State.
REASON: 1.4 (b), (d) 

-----------
Summary
----------- 

1.  (C)  The Ambassador shared ref (a) points on Venezuela's
nefarious influence in the region with Holy See internal affairs
chief (Vatican number three) Archbishop Leonardo Sandri December
17.  Some points were news to Sandri, but he was not surprised
and said he shared U.S. concerns about Chavez and other leftist
leaders in Latin America.  An interlocutor from the Vatican MFA
as well told the Ambassador that he and his superiors were wary
of connections among these leaders.  Neither prelate thought the
Vatican would become more aggressive in speaking out against
these figures, both because of recent history and the potential
for a backlash against the Church.  The Ambassador will see FM
Lajolo after the holidays to continue this dialogue.  End
Summary. 

-------------------------------
Sandri Under No Illusions
------------------------------- 

2.  (C)  The Ambassador met with Archbishop Leonardo Sandri
December 17 for a wide-ranging conversation on the Church in
Latin America.  Sandri, an Argentine and former nuncio to
Venezuela, is the chief of Vatican internal operations and
generally regarded as the Holy See's number three behind the
pope and Secretary of State.  Ambassador discussed ref (a)
points, emphasizing the danger Chavez poses to the governments
around him.  Sandri was aware of some points, but others came as
news to him.  In any case, he was not surprised. Sandri said he
was convinced that Chavez was dangerous from the time he took
office and Sandri was stationed in Caracas.  The archbishop said
he had taken a harder line than the U.S. Embassy at the time,
who told him to "wait and see" what Chavez did in office. 

-------------------------
Holy See Concerned
------------------------- 

3.  (C)  According to Sandri, who said he knew the pope's
thinking on the subject, the Holy See is concerned about a
general leftward shift in Latin America.  He mentioned concerns
about several figures who seemed to be looking to Castro and
Chavez, including Mexico's Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador.  Holy
See MFA Country Director for the U.S. and Mexico Monsignor Paolo
Gualtieri told the Ambassador in a separate meeting December 15
that his superiors in the MFA were of a similar mindset.  They
see the connections between Chavez, Castro, and other leftist
politicians in Latin America, and are concerned about the
dangers they present on many levels. 

---------------
What to Do?
--------------- 

4.   (C)  While the Vatican agrees that these figures are
dangerous, it sees the question of how to deal with them as more
complicated.  The Ambassador's conversation with Sandri tracked
closely with the description of the pope's concern on Venezuela
noted in ref (b).  However, Sandri stuck to the previous Vatican
line on engagement there; he did not see the Holy See changing
its non-confrontational approach to Chavez given the recent
history between Venezuela and the Holy See (ref c).  He
responded favorably to the idea that direct aid from the U.S.
Catholic Church to the Venezuelan Church to help the latter
build up its social programs could help counteract Chavez's
appeal and blunt his attacks on the Church.  Gualtieri noted
that in the case of someone like Lopez Obrador, the Church had
to be careful not to overstep its bounds into politics, no
matter how it felt. He said Masonic groups and some segments of
Mexican society were ready to pounce on bishops or clergy who
strayed into the political realm (ref d). 

------------
Comment
----------- 

5. (C)   The Holy See continues to feel that a
non-confrontational approach to Chavez is the right strategy for
the time being, but the Vatican hierarchy is under no illusions
about the danger of Chavez and kindred souls - and the
connections between them.  Sandri has great influence in the
Vatican and as a former nuncio to Venezuela his views on that
country carry particular weight.  But his formal competency is
the internal affairs of the Church.  The Ambassador will see
Gualtieri's boss, FM Lajolo, after the holidays to continue this
dialogue, as Lajolo has the lead on all questions of foreign
policy.
ROONEY

SECRET: ITALY REQUESTS ASSISTANCE FOR ANTI-PIRACY

VZCZCXYZ0001
OO RUEHWEB

DE RUEHRO #0433/01 1061348
ZNY SSSSS ZZH
O 161348Z APR 09
FM AMEMBASSY ROME
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 1935
INFO RUEHDJ/AMEMBASSY DJIBOUTI PRIORITY 0273
RUEKJCS/JOINT STAFF WASHDC PRIORITY
RHMFISS/HQ USEUCOM VAIHINGEN GE PRIORITY
RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHDC PRIORITY
RHMFISS/HQ USCENTCOM MACDILL AFB FL PRIORITY
S E C R E T ROME 000433 

SIPDIS 

OSD FOR MAGGIE SADOWSKA
EUR/RPM FOR CHRIS DAVY AND PETER CHISHOLM
EUR/WE FOR CHRIS JESTER AND PAMELA SPRATLEN
AF/RSA FOR MIKE BITTRICK AND JUN BANDO 

E.O. 12958: DECL: 04/17/2019
TAGS: MASS MARR EWWT KCRM PBTS PGOV PHSA PREL AORC

SUBJECT: PIRACY: ITALY REQUESTS ASSISTANCE FOR ANTI-PIRACY
OPERATION 

REF: WASLEY-JESTER-SADOWSKA EMAILS 4-15-09 

Classified By: Charge d'Affaires a.i. Elizabeth Dibble for
Reasons 1.4 (B) and (D) 

1. (S)  The Government of Italy sent U.S. Embassy Rome an
unclassified Note Verbale on April 16 thanking the USG for
assistance provided thus far in the deployment of Italian
Special Forces to Djibouti for possible use in an anti-piracy
mission and requesting continuing assistance as needed.  The
note, sent in unclassified channels to speed up the process,
was generated in response to our requirement that any further
USG assistance in support of the Italian anti-piracy mission
be requested via Diplomatic Note. 

2. (S) Background: The Italian-owned and flagged tugboat
Buccaneer was taken by pirates in the Gulf of Aden on April
11.  The ship has 16 crew members on board: 10 Italian, 5
Romanian, and 1 Croatian, and is currently about one nautical
mile from the coast of Somalia.  The Italian military has
requested permission from the Government of Djibouti and
Combined Joint Task Force-Horn of Africa (CJTF-HOA) to use
Camp Lemonier in Djibouti as a logistical staging area in
preparation for a possible rescue mission.  The GOI assures
us that it has obtained all the necessary landing permits
from the Government of Djibouti.  It has already landed one
aircraft in Djibouti with approximately 29 logistical support
staff, currently housed at Camp Lemonier, to prepare for the
staging.  The mission, if it happens, will not/not be
launched from Djiboutian soil, and the GOI is currently
considering other options that do not entail a rescue
mission.  Italy may use its Frigate MAESTRALE, currently
deployed to the region as part of EU operation ATALANTA, and
which is currently shadowing the pirates, to launch the
operation, or may make use of other vessels.  Italy may
request helicopter, intel, and other logistical support from
the U.S. as the need arises, but currently its request is
limited to logistical support to house units at Camp
Lemonier. 

3. (S) Post has stressed to the GOI the need to provide as
many details as possible about the potential operation in a
timely manner, as well as the need to coordinate fully with
the Government of Djibouti.  The Defense Attache is in
contact with the Italian Military and Poloffs are in contact
with the MFA Operations Center as the situation evolves, and
will provide additional operational details as they become
available. 

4. (SBU) The translated text of the Note is as follows
(Italian original will be emailed to EUR/WE): 

BEGIN TEXT 

"Ministry of Foreign Affairs 

Rome, 4/16/2009
Prot. 0129432 

The Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Italy
presents its compliments to the Embassy of the United States
of America and, in consideration of our shared efforts in the
fight against terrorism and piracy, has the honor to express
its full appreciation for the assistance provided to the
"Training Mission" sent to Djibouti. 

The sending of the mission, as well as the deployment of the
Italian Frigate "MAESTRALE," forms part of the efforts
undertaken by the Government of Italy in the struggle against
piracy. 

While noting that the Authorities of Djibouti have provided
the necessary visas and aircraft landing authorizations, the
Italian Government is particularly grateful to the Government
of the United States of America for having hosted this
mission at Camp Lemonier.  The Italian Government, in
addition, is grateful to the Government of the United States
of America henceforth for any further assistance that it
might provide in the future. 

The Ministry of Foreign Affairs, in expressing its full
gratitude for the collaboration, takes the opportunity to
extend to the Embassy of the United States of America
reassurances of its highest consideration."

END TEXT 

DIBBLE

TOP-SECRET: The Diary of Anatoly Chernyaev 1989

Washington, DC, July 31st – The National Security Archive publishes its fourth installment of the diary of Anatoly Chernyaev, the man who was behind some of the most momentous transformations in Soviet foreign policy at the end of the 1980s in his role as Mikhail Gorbachev’s main foreign policy aide.  In addition to his contributions to perestroika and new thinking, Anatoly Sergeevich was and remains a paragon of openness and transparency, providing his diaries and notes to historians who are trying to understand the end of the Cold War.  This section of the diary, covering 1989—the year of miracles—is published here in English for the first time.

After the “turning point year,” 1988, the Soviet reformers around Gorbachev expected fast progress on all fronts—domestically in implementation of the results of the XIX party conference and further democratization of the Soviet system, and internationally following the groundbreaking UN speech of December 1988, especially in the sphere of nuclear arms control and in integrating the Soviet Union into Europe.  However, those hopes were not realized, and the year brought quite unexpected challenges and outcomes.  By the end of the year, no new arms control agreements would be signed, but the Berlin Wall would fall, nationalist movements would start threatening the unity of the Soviet Union, and popular revolutions would sweepEastern Europewhile the Soviets stuck to their pledge not to use force.  By the end of 1989,Europewas transformed and the Cold War had ended.  Anatoly Chernyaev documented all those changes meticulously and reflected on their meaning in real time.

For Chernyaev, the year began with an argument over the final withdrawal of Soviet forces fromAfghanistan.  Soviet Foreign Minister Eduard Shevardnadze tried to delay the full withdrawal of troops and to send an additional brigade to help the Afghan leader Najibullah repel attacks of Pakistani-supported mujahaddin and stabilize his government.  Chernyaev and Alexander Yakovlev actively opposed that course of action on the grounds that it would cost hundreds of lives of Soviet soldiers and undermine Soviet trustworthiness in the eyes of international partners.  The troops were withdrawn on schedule by February 15, 1989.

Domestically, the most important event was the first contested election to the Congress of People’s Deputies on March 26, 1989.  Chernyaev himself was elected as a Deputy, but expressed unease about being among the 100 candidates on the “guaranteed” party list.  His reflections on the electoral campaign and the results of the elections show his sincere belief that the Soviet system could be transformed by deepening the democratization and his concerns over the limitations and resistance by the conservative elements within the party.  The electoral campaign takes place at the time when the economic situation deteriorates quite significantly, leading to unprecedented discontent of the population and ultimately miners’ strikes in the summer.

An important theme of 1989 is the growing nationalism and the threat of possible breakup of theSoviet Union—“the nationalities bomb.”  On this issue, Chernyaev seems to understand the situation much better than Gorbachev, who until very late does not comprehend the fact that the Baltic states genuinely want to leave the Soviet Union, maybe up until the human chain of protesters forms on August 23, 1989.  Gorbachev believes that they could be kept in by negotiations and economic pressure.  The events inTbilision April 9, 1989, where the police killed 20 civilians trying to disperse nationalist rallies, should have been a wake-up call.  Chernyaev wonders if Gorbachev understands all the depth of the nationalities issue or if he is still under the influence of the Soviet official narrative of harmonious relations between ethnic groups under socialism.

The summer of 1989 brings the Solidarity victory in the Polish elections and the start of the Hungarian roundtable negotiations culminating in the first non-communist government in Eastern Europe inPolandand the Soviet acceptance of those events.  On the heels of the Polish and Hungarian breakthroughs comes the change of leadership inEast Germanyand the almost accidental yet fateful fall of the Berlin Wall.  In this case, just as on the issue of nationalism, Chernyaev shows a much better understanding of its true meaning than most other Soviet leaders.  In the fall of the Wall, he sees an end of an era, the true transformation of the international system, and a beginning of a new chapter in the European history.  The start of the process of German reunification and theMaltasummit signified the end of the Cold War.

However, for Chernyaev, his position notwithstanding, the year’s main concern was the domestic developments in theSoviet Union, and specifically the insufficient progress in radical economic and political reform.  A lot of entries deal with his disappointment in Gorbachev’s slow or ambivalent actions where he seems to be siding with conservatives, his inability to move more decisively even on the issues that he himself proclaimed, such as land reform.  Chernyaev’s main lament is that Gorbachev is losing time and political power as a result of his indecisiveness while the opposition is growing strong using “the Russian factor” and becoming more anti-Gorbachev and siding with Yeltsin more and more often in the Congress of People’s Deputies.

All through the tumultuous events of 1989, Anatoly Chernyaev remains at Gorbachev’s side, faithful to the ideas and the promise of the reform, but at the same time more and more critical at the weaknesses and inconsistencies of his boss and growing more dissatisfied by the emerging distance in their personal relationship.  The last entry of the year, for December 31, is written in the form of a letter to Gorbachev, expressing all his disappointments and worries about the fate of the reform.  The diary entries allow historians an opportunity to see the days of 1989 as they unfolded, through the eyes of a most perceptive and involved participant.

The Chernyaev Diary was translated by Anna Melyakova and edited by Svetlana Savranskaya for the National Security Archive.

CONFIDENTIAL: ITALY: PIRATES RELEASE BUCCANEER CREW WITHOUT

VZCZCXRO4374
PP RUEHFL RUEHNP
DE RUEHRO #0944/01 2291429
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
P 171429Z AUG 09
FM AMEMBASSY ROME
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 2536
INFO RUEHUP/AMEMBASSY BUDAPEST PRIORITY 0648
RUEHEG/AMEMBASSY CAIRO PRIORITY 0448
RUEHDJ/AMEMBASSY DJIBOUTI PRIORITY 0276
RUEHNR/AMEMBASSY NAIROBI PRIORITY 1594
RUEHYN/AMEMBASSY SANAA PRIORITY 0193
RUEHVB/AMEMBASSY ZAGREB PRIORITY 0799
RUEHFL/AMCONSUL FLORENCE PRIORITY 3753
RUEHMIL/AMCONSUL MILAN PRIORITY 0185
RUEHNP/AMCONSUL NAPLES PRIORITY 3961
RUEHFR/UNESCO PARIS FR PRIORITY
RUEHNO/USMISSION USNATO PRIORITY 3032
RUEHBS/USEU BRUSSELS PRIORITY 4853
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 ROME 000944 

SENSITIVE
SIPDIS 

E.O. 12958: DECL: 08/13/2019
TAGS: PREL PHSA SO IT

SUBJECT: ITALY: PIRATES RELEASE BUCCANEER CREW WITHOUT
RANSOM PAYMENT 

REF: ROME 00930 

Classified By: Charge d'affaires Elizabeth Dibble for reasons 1.4 (b) a
nd (d). 

1. (C) Summary: On August 11, Poloff met with Massimiliano
D'Antuono, Deputy Head of the MFA Crisis Unit, to discuss the
details of the release of the MV Buccaneer crew which was
taken hostage by pirates off the coast of Somalia. A Somali
pirate is quoted in the press as saying that a four million
euro ransom had been paid.  This conflicts with Foreign
Minister Frattini's statement that "Strong political work
with local authorities as well as an Italian warship that was
standing by with Special Forces finally made the pirates
understand there was no other solution than to release the
ship."  D'Antuono affirmed that the hostage release was the
result of diplomatic, military and intelligence efforts.  He
asserted that the Prime Minister of the Transitional Federal
Government (TFG) of Somalia was instrumental in the
negotiations with the pirates because of his
family/clan/tribal links.  End summary. 

Background
- - - - - 

2. (C) On April 11, the deep water tugboat MV Buccaneer was
slowly towing two large barges at 4-5 knots in the Gulf of
Aden. Because it was moving too slowly to join a convoy, and
because its rear deck was designed to be low to the water
line, the crew of 10 Italians, 5 Romanians and 1 Croat was an
easy target for Somali pirates.  According to D'Antuono, a
couple of hours after the ship was commandeered, one crew
member was able to push a distress button calling for help.
The ship's owner received an email from the Buccaneer with
its location coordinates, but he correctly identified the
message as a ruse because ""the English used was better than
anything the crew was capable of.""  The pirates were able to
anchor the ship in a cove on the Somali coast.  After 2-3
weeks, the Italian Navy ship San Giorgio arrived in the
vicinity to take up a position approximately eight miles off
the shore.  Italian Special Forces, who arrived on the San
Giorgio, routinely positioned themselves and their small
boats in close proximity to the Buccaneer so that they could
react within 20-30 seconds to an assault by the pirates on
the hostages.  D'Antuono implied the pirates knew the Special
Forces had positioned themselves within striking distance
even if they were not able to visibly locate them. 

3. (C) The Crisis Unit worked under the direct supervision of
the "highest levels" of the MFA to negotiate the hostages'
release.  D'Antuono described a "three-pillar approach using
diplomatic, military and intelligence resources."  He
traveled to Somalia with Margherita Boniver, FM Frattini's
Special Envoy for Humanitarian Emergencies, to leverage
Italy's "special relationship" with Somalia and the GOI's
current support for the TFG.  Meetings with the TFG Prime
Minister Sharmarke served to exert pressure on the pirates by
virtue of family/clan/tribal relations.  Asked for specifics,
he demurred that "the Prime Minister was the one who made the
release happen." 

4. (C) D'Antuono emphasized that under Italian law, no ransom
could be paid to release the sailors.  He stated that the
owner of one of the barges offered to pay a ransom, but was
informed that proceeding with that course of action would
result in prosecution by the Italian courts.  In contrast to
the barge owner's interactions with the GOI, he described the
governments of Romania and Croatia, whose nationals were also
being held captive, as being completely supportive of the
GOI's lead role in the negotiations. 

5. (C) Without discussing details, D'Antuono stated that at a
certain point, the Special Forces from the San Giorgio were
cleared to board the Buccaneer after all of the pirates had
vacated the ship.  The Special Forces took control of the
ship and set sail with the crew to Djibouti.  After a medical
assessment in Djibouti, the crew flew to Italy where they
will brief the prosecutor's office in Rome responsible for
handling such cases for possible future action.  D'Antuono
believed the crew was treated reasonably well with the
exception of a "beating of one of the Romanians" by the
pirates.  He mentioned that, at least once, the crew was
taken ashore to offer relief from the cramped quarters of the
ship. 

6. (C) D'Antuono emphasized the GOI's aversion to resorting
to a military operation because of the negative Italian
public opinion that would likely follow any loss of life.  He
suggested that headlines describing fatherless children would
have been a public relations disaster for the GOI, especially
as the world focused its attention on Italy as the host of
the G8 Summit in June. 

Ransom Paid?
- - - - - - - 

7. (C) Andrew Mwangura, of the Mombasa-based East African
Seafarer's Assistance Programme was quoted in the press as
saying that the pirates received a four million euro ransom.
Sometimes described as an intermediary between pirates and
those who pay ransom, his role, if any, in the release of the
Buccaneer crew is not clear.  D'Antuono stated that the MFA
is "familiar with" Mwangura, but dismissed his claims of a
paid ransom as "a marketing technique."  He reasoned that
releasing a crew without receiving a ransom would set an
unprofitable precedent.  He assessed claims of having
received a ransom as a necessary strategy to protect the
economic value of the pirates' illicit activities. 

8. (SBU) In terms of what the GOI did offer the TFG, if not
the pirates, an MFA statement describes financial support in
2009 dedicated to ""Somali institutions and to the peace
process"" totaling 13 million euros.  Additional money has
been disbursed through the Italian Development Cooperation.
(see reftel) 

Comment
- - - - 

9. (C) The official line on the Buccaneer release is a
substantial but incomplete accounting of factors that brought
this situation to a peaceful conclusion.  Gaining the release
of the Italian vessel and hostages was a top priority, albeit
low profile effort, for the Italian government.  Prime
Minister Berlusconi himself reportedly made many of the early
critical decisions.  Italy, with U.S. assistance, moved
quickly to ensure that it had a full range of options
available to resolve the issue, including the strategic
positioning of elite forces ready to engage in an
extraction/rescue operation if necessary.  These efforts were
buttressed by Italy's re-energizing its relations with
Somalia and engaging in a high profile ""embrace"" of its
former colony.  In spite of Italy's slashed overseas budget,
it has dedicated significant development and humanitarian
assistance to the TFG and announced its commitment to re-open
an embassy in Mogadishu at the June 2009 International
Contact Group on Somalia meeting held in Rome.  A logical
quid pro quo for Italy's new engagement was TFG action to
resolve the hostage crisis.  Adamant denials that Italy paid
ransom, directly or otherwise, have been accompanied by
claims of ignorance of TFG initiatives to liberate the
hostages.  The GOI was acutely aware of the strong USG
opposition to the payment of ransom in this case and we
believe that resulted in Italy relying heavily on the TFG to
deliver its citizens.
DIBBLE

CONFIDENTIAL: BAHAMAS UNLIKELY TO PRESSURE ARISTIDE

C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 NASSAU 000766 

SIPDIS 

E.O. 12958: DECL: 04/17/2013
TAGS: PREL PGOV PREF HA BF
SUBJECT: BAHAMAS UNLIKELY TO PRESSURE ARISTIDE 

Classified By: DCM Robert M. Witajewski, Reasons 1.5(b) and (d) 

Summary 

1.  (C) After returning from the OAS/CARICOM meeting on Haiti
in Miami, Foreign Minister Fred Mitchell dismissed the
possibility of invoking the democracy provision of the OAS
Charter in the case of Haiti.  He acknowledged problems with
democracy in Haiti, but made it clear that the Bahamian
government preferred continued engagement with President
Aristide to any type of public confrontation.  He also
announced a decision to provide $500,000 in economic
assistance to Haiti, while admitting that it would not do
much good if the political situation did not improve.
Mitchell's main concern is doing whatever he can to slow down
illegal immigration from Haiti - a key domestic political
imperative - and he has been fruitlessly pursuing an
immigration accord with the Government of Haiti for several
months.  A high official at the Foreign Ministry, although he
proclaimed himself "not competent" to comment on Haiti policy
(or much of anything else), confirmed that Haiti believes it
must stay engaged with the Aristide government to prevent a
mass migration.  End Summary. 

Democracy in Crisis... 

2.  (U) Upon his return from Miami, Foreign Minister Mitchell
discussed the situation there with the press.  He admitted
that the CARICOM Foreign Ministers were "frustrated with the
situation in Haiti, and said that Aristide had put the
international community "in a difficult position" by not
living up to his commitments.  He spoke frankly about Haiti's
failure to: select an appropriate police commissioner, arrest
an important fugitive involved in political violence, and
plan for elections.  While he placed some of the blame for
the lack of progress toward a political solution on the
opposition, he acknowledged the government's greater share of
blame and discussed the reasons why the opposition might feel
threatened and unwilling to make concessions. 

... But Need to Give Aristide Another Chance 

3.  (U) However, Mitchell went on to say that he thought it
was "likely that the deadline will be extended," and Aristide
should be given yet another chance to meet his commitments.
He pointed out that The Bahamas, in his opinion has no
choice: "We cannot afford to disengage from Haiti because
disengaging for us is not an option."  According to Mitchell,
the issue of Haitian migrants and the potential for mass
migration is the key issue for The Bahamas.  Such a mass
migration must be prevented at all costs, and Mitchell made
it clear that he believed the best way to do that was
continued engagement with the Aristide government in an
attempt to improve Haiti's political and economic situation. 

4.  (U) Mitchell was dismissive of the possibility of
invoking the democracy provisions of the OAS Charter, saying
that although "Some people argue that's the case in Haiti ...
I think that is taking it a little bit too far."  He
described the U.S. position on Haiti as "hard-minded", and
called for continued dialogue.  Mitchell also announced a
$500,000 economic assistance package for Haiti.  In
announcing it, he acknowledged that the assistance would
likely not do much good unless the political impasse were
resolved.  Mitchell defended the package, however, by
reiterating that the Government of the Bahamas must do
whatever it can to improve the economic situation in Haiti
because of the impact The Bahamas would likely feel if
further economic and political crisis resulted in a mass
migration.  He made it very clear that this is the paramount
issue for The Bahamas. 

Who Is Competent Then? 

5.  (C) DCM and POL/ECON section chief raised the issue of
Haiti with Ministry of Foreign Affairs Undersecretary for
Political Affairs Marco Rolle in an April 15 meeting
requested by Rolle to go over the list of pending items
between the Embassy and the MFA.  Rolle, despite being the
number three official at the Ministry of Embassy (he is the
Bahamian equivalent of Undersecretary Grossman) and having
accompanied Mitchell to both Miami and the press conference,
told us that he "was not competent" to talk about Haiti
policy with us.  He couldn't even confirm any details about
the aid package the Minister had announced in his presence.
Nor could he comment on progress made toward an immigration
accord with Haiti or the upcoming visit by Mitchell to Haiti
in late March beyond confirming the dates (May 22-23).  The
one specific response we received to a question was whether
or not Foreign Minister Fred Mitchell planned to make any
trips or telephone calls to Haitian counterparts prior to the
April 30 OAS meeting in Washington.  The answer is: No. 

Consistently Not Competent 

6.  (C) Inability to provide specific responses to queries
was a consistent theme of our conversation with Rolle.  Of
the fifteen pending items on our agenda, he was unable to
comment meaningfully on any single one of them, and could not
point to MFA progress in resolving any of the issues which
have been pending anywhere from 2-3 weeks (dip notes
regarding a trade dispute, RBDF training and a proposal to
form an anti-alien-smuggling task force) to 6 years (request
for a bilateral work agreement).  Rolle, a career civil
servant with no background in foreign affairs, has only been
with the ministry for about seven months, so it can be
understood that he might not be familiar with every issue,
but we would think he could do better than 0 for 15.  The
Bahamian civil service has honed sloth and delay disguised as
deliberation and consensus-building to a fine art.
Comment 

7.   (C) We believe the bottom line for The Bahamas on Haiti
is their fear of mass migration and doing anything that might
trigger an outflow.  Mitchell in particular has made
conclusion of an immigration agreement his top foreign policy
priority.  Our sources in the Immigration Department tell us
the negotiations are not going well, stalled over Haitian
insistence on an amnesty for the 30,000 - 100,000 Haitians
already in The Bahamas (most illegally).  Such a concession
would be suicide for Mitchell in the xenophobic Bahamian
political landscape.  Pursuit of this agreement and any other
means to slow down migration will continue to push any
concerns for democracy and human rights into the backseat.
While The Bahamas will remain engaged on Haiti, the Christie
government will resist any effort to put real teeth into any
diplomatic effort to pressure President Aristide, preferring
(endless) conversation and dialogue to the alternative. 

BLANKENSHIP

CONFIDENTIA: HAITI: HOLY SEE WORRIED ABOUT VIOLENCE

C O N F I D E N T I A L  VATICAN 005164 

SIPDIS 

DEPT FOR EUR/WE LEVIN; WHA/CAR 

E.O. 12958: DECL: 11/13/2013
TAGS: PHUM PINR PREL VT HA
SUBJECT: HAITI: HOLY SEE WORRIED ABOUT VIOLENCE, SEEKS
BALANCE AMIDST DIVIDED CHURCH 

REF: A. A) PORT AU PRINCE 2208 

     B. B) PORT AU PRINCE 2249
     C. C) PORT AU PRINCE 2188
     D. D) PORT AU PRINCE 2344
     E. E) PORT AU PRINCE 2345 

Classified By: Charge d'Affaires Brent Hardt for reason 1.5 (b) and (d)
. 

-------
Summary
------- 

1. (C) Vatican MFA Caribbean Affairs Office Director Giorgio
Lingua said November 7 that the Holy See is "very worried"
about the situation in Haiti.  He expressed concern about the
disruption of an October 16 mass (ref a and b), and noted the
potential for violence in the coming weeks (ref d).  Acting
Foreign Minister Pietro Parolin emphasized in a November 13
meeting the difficult balancing act that Vatican and
Episcopal leadership in Haiti must perform in pressing for
reform while avoiding instigating further violence.  He noted
in this regard that the Haitian Episcopal Conference had
signed on to the protest letter to the Haitian Government
sent by the papal nuncio after the October 16 disturbance
(ref b).  According to Lingua, the Haitian Catholic Church is
struggling in general, with many people leaving the Church
due to disillusionment with its handling of the Aristide
crisis.  Though he acknowledged the challenges Aristide
presented to those seeking reform, Lingua thought that
pressure for increased democratic expression might be
effective if it did not threaten Aristide's legitimacy.  End
summary. 

---------------------
The Vatican's Concern
--------------------- 

2. (C) MFA Caribbean Affairs Office Director Giorgio Lingua
told poloff November 7 that the Holy See is "very worried"
about the situation in Haiti, following the disruption of the
October 16 papal anniversary mass (ref a, b) and continuing
violent incidents.  Lingua told us a Haitian MFA
representative had called Papal Nuncio Luigi Bonazzi to
express his regret for the incident at mass, but said that to
his knowledge Aristide himself had not contacted any Vatican
representative to comment on the incident.  Lingua expressed
some satisfaction with news that Aristide had spoken to
opposition leader Evans Paul after the incident, as the
post-mass mugging of Evans Paul was also troubling to the
Vatican.  The Holy See remains concerned about the potential
for more violence in the lead-up to the bicentennial
anniversary of the Battle of Vertieres on November 18 (ref d). 

---------------------------
A Church Balancing, Divided
--------------------------- 

3. (C) According to Lingua, Aristide,s exploitation of some
clergy members for propaganda purposes was taking its toll on
the Haitian population.  Lingua said Haitians see "a Church
divided," with some clergy supporting the Lavalas party and
others against it.  Lingua claimed this lack of solidarity
fostered disillusionment to the point where people were
leaving the Church in increasing numbers. 

4. (C) When asked if the October 16 incident might prompt the
Holy See to raise its voice more forcefully against
Aristide's abuses, Lingua was noncommittal, saying the
Vatican needed to balance pressure on Aristide against a
delicate security situation on the ground.  Similarly, he
said the Haitian bishops needed to tread lightly, as
Aristide's unpredictable nature made such expression 

dangerous.  Holy See Acting Foreign Minister Pietro Parolin
reiterated this point in a November 13 meeting with the
Charge, while also noting that the bishops had signed on to
Nuncio Bonazzi's protest letter to the GOH.  According to
Lingua, the bishops "realize they should speak louder," but
have to pick their spots carefully. 

--------------------
Episcopal Leadership
-------------------- 

5. (C) Lingua told us the newly-appointed archbishop of Cap
Haitien, Hubert Constant, was similarly in a difficult
position.  Lingua said (protect) Constant had a "good spirit
and pastoral character, but is conditioned by the presence --
in fact the omnipresence -- of Aristide."  Deputy FM Parolin
was somewhat more positive on Constant, noting his role in
protesting the October 16 incident.  On leadership in
Port-au-Prince, Parolin confirmed that Coadjutor Bishop Serge
Miot would succeed Archbishop Ligonde as head of the
archdiocese when Archbishop Ligonde retires formally.  He
also denied that Miot was too close to the Aristide camp,
asserting that Miot, too, had played a role the post-October
16 protest. 

---------------------
Comment: Where to go?
--------------------- 

6. (C) Despite Lingua's rather somber assessment of the
situation, he said the Holy See believes there are some
glimmers of hope for progress Haiti.  He said the Vatican had
noticed signs of increased discontent within the Lavalas
party that could contribute to prospects for future reform.
The best bet, he believed, was for further international
pressure, especially from the United States, for increased
democratic expression within the country -- without directly
challenging Aristide's legitimacy.  This tracks with the
conservative approach we have seen from the Holy See in such
situations.  The Vatican is far more likely to take the
long-term view than to invite confrontation -- or encourage
local bishops to do so. 

7. (C) When looking at the big picture, Lingua said,
effecting change in Haiti should be easier than in Cuba.
Unlike Castro, Lingua observed, Aristide is not ideologically
motivated.  "This is one person -- not a system," he added.
Citing the effects on the U.S. of Haitian drug trafficking
and illegal immigration, Lingua acknowledged the USG interest
in Haiti, even beyond its humanitarian concerns.  Lingua
noted with interest the arrival of Ambassador Foley in
Port-au-Prince; consequently we passed him a copy of the
Ambassador's ref E press statement. 

HARDT

CONFIDENTIAL: HAITIAN AMBASSADOR TO DOMINICAN REPUBLIC RESIGNS

C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 SANTO DOMINGO 007536 

SIPDIS 

STATE FOR WHA/CAR, DEPT PLEASE PASS TO USOAS 

E.O. 12958: DECL: 12/22/2013
TAGS: PGOV PREL PHUM PINR DR HA
SUBJECT: HAITIAN AMBASSADOR TO DOMINICAN REPUBLIC RESIGNS:
ANOTHER BLOW TO ARISTIDE 

REF: A. PORT AU PRINCE 2540
     B. SANTO DOMINGO 4930 

Classified By: ACTING DCM MARY B. MARSHALL FOR REASONS 1.5 B/D 

SUMMARY 

1. (C) On December 18 the Haitian Ambassador to the Dominican
Republic Guy Alexandre called on the Ambassador and Acting
DCM to confirm his resignation.  The sudden news (prompted by
the violent December 5 crackdown on student demonstrators in
Haiti) was widely covered December 16 while Ambassador
Alexandre was out of the country visiting his wife in Puerto
Rico.  Ambassdor Alexandre's resignation is due to what he
described as "incompatible principles" with Arisitide's
government.  Composed but staunch in his resolve, Alexandre
assured the Ambassador that he has no plans to seek asylum in
the United States for now.  Requesting asylum, he explained,
would "further complicate Dominican-Haitian bilateral
relations" and would not be in his nor Haiti's best
interests.  Instead, Alexandre said he would seek residency
in the Dominican Republic and teach at a university.  End
Summary. 

ALEXANDRE RESIGNS AS AMBASSADOR TO THE DR 

2. (C) Ambassador Guy Alexandre met with the Ambassador and
Acting DCM on December 18 to discuss his recent resignation.
He said that he had planned to leave his post in January 2004
after Haiti's independence bicentennial celebrations, which
would have also marked two years in his assignment.  However,
he could not ignore the recent violence against students in
Haiti because of his strong links to the academic community
there.  According to Alexandre, police officers broke both
knees of one of his friends, a vice-rector at a university
(Ref A).  The December 5 violence, he lamented, "produced an
irrevocable situation that cannot be easily fixed,"
following months of extreme polarization and resulting chaos. 

3. (C) According to Ambassador Alexandre's contacts in Haiti,
there are daily protests or preemptive crackdowns by police
on potential protests.  He warned of an upsurge in armed
civilians looking for trouble.  Alexandre expressed his
concern that the environment in Haiti is ripe for
confrontation, which might subside briefly during Christmas
but is sure to resume in January.  He commented that Haiti
has minimal capacity to maintain order and that "none of the
Haitian politicians realize that the country is a ticking
time bomb." 

REMOVE ARISTIDE...THEN WHAT? 

4. (C) Ambassador Alexandre criticized opposition groups'
preoccupation with forcing Aristide's departure without
considering the consequences.  He emphasized that Aristide's
exit will not solve Haiti's socio-economic problems.
Alexandre also criticized his countrymen for their focus on
grabbing power rather than tackling the difficult problems of
health, education and infrastructure.  The Ambassador asked
Alexandre whether there are clandestine movements in the
Dominican Republic working to overthrow Aristide, to which
Alexandre responded that he does not know of any such
activity.  He acknowledged that some disgruntled former
Haitian military officers reside in the Dominican Republic,
but said most of the pressure on Aristide originates in
Haiti.  He recalled the 1991-94 period when many Haitians
fled the country, but claimed there was no no mass migration.
 During that time Alexandre personally assisted 30 Haitians,
including a former Army chief. 

DOMINICAN-HAITIAN BILATERAL RELATIONS 

5. (C) Less than three weeks before his resignation,
Ambassador Alexandre met with the Ambassador on December 1 to
discuss concerns about Dominican-Haitian bilateral relations.
 He was disturbed about the GODR's apparent nonchalant
investigations regarding the Haitian bodies discovered along
the border in September (Ref B).  Alexandre also said the
GODR is not doing enough to document Haitians.  He complained
that the GODR often uses Article 11 of the Dominican
Constitution (providing that anyone born on Dominican soil is
Dominican except offspring of diplomats or foreigners in
transit) to deny citizenship to Haitians for being
"foreigners in transit."  Ambassador Alexandre also blamed
the failure of the 2001 OAS initiative on a lack of OAS
impartiality (Note: This argument was reiterated at the
follow-up meeting on December 18.  End note). 

ALEXANDRE'S ONWARD PLANS 

6. (C) Alexandre said he currently plans to reside in the
Dominican Republic, not flee to the United States.  He was
traveling to Puerto Rico when his resignation hit the press
and returned quickly thereafter.  He emphasized his desire to
get involved in academia and denied having strong ties to
successful Haitian expats in the United States.  Alexandre
did ask the Acting DCM (Consul General) that his B1/B2
nonimmigrant visa be transferred to his tourist passport.
Alexandre said the GOH had not yet accepted his resignation.
He claimed to have no interest in politics because he "knows
too well what Haiti needs."
HERTELL

CONFIDENTIAL: ANXIOUS PRIME MINISTER REQUESTS MEETING ON HAITI

C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 04 NASSAU 000364 

SIPDIS 

E.O. 12958: DECL: 02/22/2014
TAGS: PGOV PREL SMIG BF HA
SUBJECT: ANXIOUS PRIME MINISTER REQUESTS MEETING ON HAITI 

REF: A) NASSAU 211 B) NASSAU 212 C) NASSAU 263 D)
     NASSAU 322 

Classified By: CHARGE ROBERT M. WITAJEWSKI FOR REASONS 1.4 (B) AND (D). 

- - - -
Summary
- - - - 

1  (C)  At a special luncheon function to honor Junior
Achievement on February 19, Prime Minister Christie twice
came to the Charge's table to request an "urgent" meeting the
morning of February 20, later set for 12:30 in the PM's
office.  As events in Haiti continue to deteriorate, the
sense of vulnerability by the Government of the Commonwealth
of The Bahamas (GCOB) at being overwhelmed by mass Haitian
migration continues to grow.  In this light, both the PM and
Foreign Minister Fred Mitchell have exerted considerable time
and energy in recent weeks to mediate peace talks between
President Aristide and the opposition (reported reftels A, B
and C).  Increasing deterioration in conditions in Haiti are
also reinforcing the Bahamian Government's sense of
dependence on the United States in the event uncontrolled
Haitian migrant outflows occur.  At the 60 minute meeting on
February 20 in his private office, PM Christie updated Charge
on recent developments on Haiti from his Government's
perspective.
END SUMMARY 

- - - - - - - - - - - - - -  -
FOREIGN MINISTER BRIEFS THE UN
- - - - - - - - - - - - - -  - 

2. (C)  Christie initiated the discussion with a report on
Foreign Minister Mitchell's just-concluded presentation at
the United Nations General Assembly that morning.  The
Ministry of Foreign Affairs later faxed the Embassy a copy of
Mitchell's speech, which focused on the CARICOM proposal,
including a constitutional role for a Prime Minister, rules
governing protests and demonstrations by the opposition, the
professionalization of the Haitian National Police, and
additional security and economic support.  FM Mitchell also
called for the international community to "provide immediate
security assistance to bring stability to Haiti, including
helping the legitimate authority of Haiti to restore law and
order and disarm the elements that now seek to violently
overthrow the government, and who have interrupted
humanitarian assistance."  Mitchell continued using -- for
him -- unusually strong language: "Those armed gangs who seek
now to overthrow the constitutional order should be urged to
lay down their arms and if not they should be disarmed." 

3. (C)  Christie related to Charge that in New York Mitchell
had sought out and obtained additional support, particularly
from Central and South American countries, for the CARICOM
approach.  Christie was particularly proud that Bahamian
efforts had resulted in Venezuela, Bolivia, and Argentina
agreeing to send police or military to Haiti as he observed,
wryly, that these three countries did not normally agree with
the U.S. of late.  Christie also announced that FM Mitchell
and Assistant Secretary Roger Noriega would fly to Haiti
Saturday to continue to work all sides of the issue.
Christie spoke authoritatively about conversations between FM
Mitchell and A/S. Noriega and between Mitchell and NSC
Western Hemisphere Director Tom Shannon. He also indicated
that he had been in contact with members of the U.S.
Congressional Black Caucus to allay their "deep concerns"
about the "good faith" of the U.S. and others in seeking a
resolution to Haiti's crisis. 

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
A RELUCTANT ROLE IN HAITI FOR MITCHELL?
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 

4. (C)  The Prime Minister described his week of frantic
conference calls on the Haitian crisis and a U.S. preference
for the Bahamian Foreign Minister to play a new, and
significant on-going role in Haiti as the third member in a
tripartite committee that, Christie seemed to believe would
effectively serve as a kind of "Council of Wise Men" in
governing the country.  Christie said that as he understood
current plans, the council would be composed of three
members: a representative from the Haitian Opposition, an
independent Haitian Prime Minister, and Bahamian FM Mitchell
representing Caricom and others.  According to the Prime
Minister, however, President Aristide had expressed
reservations about the constitutionality of formally creating
such a body.  However, Christie continued, he believed from
his conversations with him that President Aristide would
accept an arrangement in which the same group would
"informally" advise him on matters. 

5. (C)  Continuing his exposition, Christie then went on to
say that his preferred solution would be for the United
States or the French to assume the leadership of this body
and supply the "third member" rather than The Bahamas. 

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - -
PRIME MINISTER WORKS THE PHONES IN NASSAU -- DEFERS TO U.S.
AS "TOP DOG"
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - 

6. (C)  The Bahamian Prime Minister appeared comfortable in
his newly-assumed role of international mediator. He noted
that he had spoken "at least a dozen times" with Haitian
President Aristide of late, and this week alone reported that
he had spoken with the Haitian President at least once each
day.  Explaining his frequent telephone conversations, PM
Christie declared that, given the urgency of the situation,
he did not want to risk having his message diluted or
distorted "by leaving (the resolution of the crisis) to
ambassadors." 

7. (C)  Noting that President Aristide had claimed that
"bandits" were responsible for attacking the Opposition, not
government forces, PM Christie said that each time he spoke
with Aristide he had stressed the importance of Aristide
appealing directly to the U.S., France, or Canada for
assistance in re-equipping Haitian police so that law and
order could be restored.  Christie indicated some sympathy
for Aristide's claimed plight, telling Charge that "there is
simply no way that a demoralized police force of less than
5,000 can maintain law in order in a country of more than 7
million."  Christie seemed hopeful that the U.S. would
reconsider its position against supplying the Haitian police
with lethal weapons, and at a minimum do more to support the
Haitian police with non-lethal support. 

8. (C)  Christie indicated his preference for continued
direct high-level involvement in Haiti.  He felt that it was
important that he and others at the head of state level
continue to involve themselves in the situation and interact
directly with Aristide in order to reinforce the urgency of
the situation. Christie said that it had been his idea to
contact South African President Thabo Mbeki to try to involve
him in Haiti.  It would be appropriate, he said, for the
world's "newest black nation" to help the world's "oldest
black nation."   At regular intervals during the one-hour
meeting, Christie reiterated the pleas for assistance to
restore law and order in Haiti made by himself and others to
Secretary Powell, President Bush, Secretary General Annan,
and the O.A.S. 

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
SYMPATHIZES WITH ARISTIDE'S CONCERNS
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 

9. (C)  Christie stressed his agreement with his Foreign
Minister that the best resolution would be an agreement that
conferred some "dignity" to Aristide.  Christie specifically
sympathized with Aristide's complaint that he (Aristide) was
being asked to take unconstitutional actions.  The Bahamian
Prime Minister indicated that based on his conversations with
Aristide, he believed that Aristide was not opposed to
working with the opposition on the joint appointment  of a
new Prime Minister and subsequently a new cabinet, but is
objecting to being left out of the process or becoming a
figurehead for the remainder of his term in office.  Christie
also made clear his position that President Aristide is
Haiti's legitimately elected constitutional leader.  But
Christie then coupled this principled stand with an
evaluation of the state of the Haitian opposition from his
position as a practicing politician.  "Even with a year to
organize," he said, "the opposition will not match Aristide's
level of support, and would lose if Aristide decided to run
again, which he will not." 

10. (C)  In this vein, Christie volunteered what he thought
might be the outcome of the February 21 talks in Port au
Prince, Christie said that he assumed that the United States
had the power to achieve a solution.  Christie said that he
was confident that A/S Noriega "had the clout" to bring
Haitian Opposition leader Apaid around, and that once Apaid
signed on to an agreement, the rest of the Opposition "would
follow" in permitting President Aristide to serve his term
out since they couldn't organize themselves to win an
election now. 

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
TURNING TO THE U.S. IN EVENT OF AN OUTFLOW FROM HAITI
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 

11. (C)  Turning from the crisis in Haiti to the consequences
for The Bahamas if that country's political instability
results in a migrant outflow, PM Perry Christie went on at
great length to reiterate his determination to build a deep
water port at Great Inagua that would serve as his country's
strategic southern base.  As he lamented: "The Haitian
problem isn't going to go away for years to come."  Given
this reality, he was convinced that the Royal Bahamian
Defence Force (RBDF) will always need to patrol the country's
vast southern waters.  Moreover, he continued, the drug
problem will always be there, and The Bahamas faces a
consistent problem of fish poaching in by neighboring
countries.  According to Christie, "Last year the Dominican
Republic exported $2 million in conch, and their ain't no
conch in Dominican waters!"  Clearly, he declared, it is in
the best interests of The Bahamas to have a deep water port
and refueling station at its southern tip.  Christie
reiterated the common interests of the United States in
having access to a similarly-situated facility and again
asked for the Charge's help in obtaining U.S. funding for
construction of a harbor and breakwater at Great Inagua. 

12. (C)  Charge responded that the U.S. would like to support
the Bahamian plan, but that it had been extremely difficult
to get RBDF and National Security officials to go beyond
global declarations and obtain specific plans regarding GCOB
intentions on Great Inagua.  Given budgetary constraints in
the United States, Charge explained that until specific plans
were forthcoming, backed up by a GCOB actually committing its
own funds, U.S. agencies would be reluctant to even consider
blocking off possible funding.  Noting that the U.S. was
already looking at FY 06 budgets, Charge urged the Prime
Minister to accelerate internal GCOB decision-making on Great
Inagua.  The Prime Minister agreed, indicating that his
government is willing to work out the details immediately. 

13. (C)  In addition to construction of a southern strategic
base in Great Inagua, the Prime Minister also revealed that
he was in negotiations to conclude an agreement with Royal
Caribbean Cruise Line to build a deep water port at Great
Inagua.  Though the island is currently barren, it is home to
more than 50,000 pink flamingos, a huge Morton Salt plant,
and at least one nice beach.  He was hoping that the flamingo
national park would provide cruise ship passengers with an
interesting diversion to the normal Caribbean port of call.
Christie took on board Charge's suggestion that costs of
constructing a base on Great Inagua could effectively be
reduced if any Royal Caribbean construction were to be made
part of the GCOB's plans. 

- - - - -
NO ASYLUM
- - - - - 

14. (C)  Regarding what The Bahamas would do in the event
that large numbers of Haitians started appearing on Bahamian
territory, the Prime Minister indicated that he would turn to
the United States to effect repatriation.  The Bahamas, he
said, simply had no capacity to maintain large numbers of
migrants for any period of time.  Declaring that he had no
concert with "those liberals" on this issue, he declared that
there would never be asylum in The Bahamas for Haitians.  The
total population of The Bahamas was, he said, "less than that
of a small town in the United States.  We simply cannot do
what Amnesty International and other groups would insist on
us." 

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
OPERATION COMPASSION HAS A NEW RELEVANCE
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 

15. (C)  Christie was surprisingly well versed on the
proposed latest iteration of Operation Compassion, a joint
patrolling exercise that involves enhanced communication and
coordination between the RBDF and the U.S. Coast Guard.  PM
Christie reported that the Cabinet had discussed
participation in "Op Compassion" the previous day and had
approved Bahamian involvement.  As the Haitian crisis has
evolved, the GCOB has deliberately taken steps in its public
comments to publicize an increased RBDF presence in southern
Bahamian waters.  Charge indicated that we believed that the
USCG would be prepared to engage in planning discussions for
this iteration of Op Compassion as early as March 3-4. 

16. (C)  However, as Ref D reports, only four of the eight
RBDF vessels capable of long range patrolling are
operational.  Charge queried the Prime Minister on the return
to service date of the HMBS Bahamas noting that effective
Bahamian participation in this six-month extended "Op
Compassion" required that there be at least three functioning
RBDF vessels (the HMBS Bahamas, Nassau, and Yellow Elder) so
that one would be on station 24/7 throughout the exercise.
Similarly, Charge noted that the logistics of keeping a
Bahamian vessel on site 24/7 also presumed that the RBDF
vessels would re-fuel and re-provision at Guantanamo Naval
Base rather than make extended return trips to its home port
of Coral Harbour in New Providence.  Finally,  Charge noted
that we would need assurances of the commitment and
cooperation of RBDF Commodore Rolle to commit the necessary
assets to the operation.  PM Christie responded that the
repairs have started and completing them is a government
priority.  He also acknowledged Commodore Rolle's reluctance
to commit the necessary assets by explaining that Rolle
claims he needs to keep some ships in reserve in the event of
other problems in other areas of the country.  The Prime
Minister said that he overrode the Commodore's objections by
asking him rhetorically, "What other crisis could impact on
The Bahamas right now that is more critical than preventing a
migrant outflow from Haiti?" 

17. (C)  Closing this part of the discussion,  the Prime
Minister also urged the U.S. to simplify matters by providing
fuel to RBDF vessels at no cost, as the relative costs are a
mere "drop in the bucket" for the U.S.  As Charge responded
that refueling costs to the GCOB would probably be much lower
at Guantanamo than in Nassau, the Prime Minister jokingly
accused Charge of "trying to nickel and dime me!" while
thanking him for not yet pressuring him for an Article 98
agreement in the meeting. 

- - - -
COMMENT
- - - - 

18.  (C)  The fact that the over-programmed Prime Minister
would budget more than one hour for a meeting on one day's
notice speaks to the overriding importance Haiti has in local
politics.  PM Christie is clearly committed to remaining
engaged on finding a solution to the Haitian problem, and
accepts that this is currently the dominating project of his
Foreign Minister, who is also the Minister of Public Service.
 While his decision-making style may be protracted and
indecisive, Bahamian Prime Minister Perry Christie is also an
impressive, dynamic, charismatic  and ebullient presence and
an indefatigable seeker of consensus.  For the purpose of
promoting peace in Haiti, his personality compliments that of
Foreign Minister Mitchell, which is steadier, stealthier, and
more methodical.  Given The Bahamas' proximity to Haiti, both
feel The Bahamas has no choice except engagement.
WITAJEWSKI

CONFIDENTIAL: BAHAMAS GOVERNMENT SEEKS SUPPORT FOR FUTURE UN

C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 NASSAU 000384 

SIPDIS 

E.O. 12958: DECL: 02/24/2014
TAGS: BF HA PGOV PREL SMIG
SUBJECT: BAHAMAS GOVERNMENT SEEKS SUPPORT FOR FUTURE UN
SECURITY COUNCIL MEETING ON HAITI 

REF: A) NASSAU 211 B) NASSAU 212 C) NASSAU 263 D)
     NASSAU 322 E) NASSAU 364 

Classified By: Charge Abdelnour Zaiback for reasons 1.5 (B) and 1.5 (D) 

- - - -
SUMMARY
- - - - 

1) (C) On February 24, Acting Ministry of Foreign Affairs
Permanent Secretary Marilyn Zonicle separately demarched each
UN Security Council member with representation in The Bahamas
for support for a possible UN Security Council meeting on
Haiti that may be requested by Jamaica Prime Minister
Patterson as early as Thursday.  The original plan was to
request the Security Council to meet on February 25 on Haiti,
however, President Aristide asked that the meeting be
deferred for 24 hours while he pursued the ongoing
negotiations.  For its part, The Bahamas seeks the active
support of the U.S. as the "most important" member of the
Security Council as it engages on a full scale diplomatic
press to achieve peace in Haiti.  If diplomacy fails, The
Bahamas believes that military assistance will be essential,
and is willing to contribute troops to a multinational effort
to maintain law and order.  END SUMMARY 

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
FOREIGN MINISTER MITCHELL ON STAND BY TO NEW YORK
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 

2) (C) Anticipating that Prime Minister Patterson would make
the request for the Security Council to hold a special
session on Haiti tomorrow, FM Mitchell had already packed his
bags and made plans to fly to New York tonight.  Patterson
and CARICOM delayed making the request for the session only
because Aristide convinced them that the opposition and
rebels could still agree to CARICOM's peace plan.  However,
as the situation on the ground in Haiti continues to
deteriorate, Zonicle anticipates that Mitchell will fly to
New York tomorrow for a requested Security Council special
session on Thursday. 

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
SIX TALKING POINTS FOR PROJECTED SECURITY COUNCIL MEETING
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 

3) (C) Follows are the six talking points presented to Charge. 

i) (C) Pending the outcome of the OAS/CARICOM-sponsored
negotiations between the Government and the Opposition in
Haiti, the CARICOM countries may request the convening of an
emergency meeting of the Security Council to address the
matter, considering the deteriorating situation in that
country and the inability of the Haitian National Police
(HNP) to deal with the insurgency. 

ii) (C) An open debate in the Security Council would allow it
to pronounce on the matter and would provide Haiti with the
opportunity to request military/police assistance,  and,
perhaps, increased humanitarian assistance, as may be
necessary.  Haiti is reluctant to take the matter to the
Security Council before the current political negotiations
have been exhausted and wishes to avoid the matter being
dealt with on "parallel tracks" by OAS/CARICOM and the UN. 

iii) (C) While France has indicated a willingness to send
military assistance to Haiti, the specter of French troops in
Haiti at this time is a very sensitive issue, particularly as
France is the former colonizer and Haiti is currently
"celebrating" the 200th anniversary of discarding that yoke.
A joint dispatch under the UN banner would be more palatable. 

iv) (C) With the United Nations, CARICOM Ambassadors are
seeking the support of the Group of Latin America and the
Caribbean (GRULAC) for the initiative and a meeting of the
GRULAC to discuss the matter is being convened Wednesday
afternoon.  Brazil and Chile, the two members of GRULAC on
the Security Council have indicated their support for the
initiative.  Other member of the GRULAC that have voiced
strong support are Mexico and Venezuela. 

v) (C) Beyond the GRULAC, CARICOM Ambassadors are in touch
with Canada and France, as well as with President of the GA,
Ambassador Colin Granderson of the CARICOM Secretariat, and
the other Under-Secretary-General for Political Affairs in
seeking to garner support for the initiative and move it
forward, as appropriate. 

vi) (C) It has been said, although not officially announced
that, Ambassador Reggie Dumas, of Trinidad and Tobago, has
been appointed as the Special Advisor on Haiti by the UN
Secretary-general.  Perhaps, the stigma of a direct request
from Haitian authorities for military assistance could be
alleviated by having the request channeled through the
Special Advisor. 

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
BAHAMAS VIEW ON OUTSIDE INTERVENTION CLARIFIED
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 

4) (C) Charge and Political Chief sought clarification on
Mitchell's vision for outside intervention.  In recent days
Mitchell has made several statements that international
support for Haiti's police was crucial, including "to disarm
the rebels if they did not disarm themselves."  Zonicle
relayed that the first priority of The Bahamas is the
principles in the CARICOM proposal, most notably reinforcing
the ability of the Haitian police to maintain law and order.
However, if this fails, Zonicle reiterated Mitchell's oft
stated plea of late, that "law and order must be restored."
Zonicle volunteered that The Bahamas was prepared to
contribute troops, "perhaps as many as 100."  While the
preferred mechanism is the United Nations, Zonicle confirmed
Mitchell's view that any outside intervention would be
preferable to continued and increased chaos. 

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
BAHAMIAN AMBASSADOR TO CARICOM SEEKS INSIGHTS ON RELATIONSHIP
BETWEEN OPPOSITION AND REBELS
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 

5) (C) Ambassador to CARICOM Leonard Archer sought Charge's
insight on the relationship between the rebels and the
opposition, but in the exchange of views it became clear that
all sides knew about the same.  Several rebel leaders have
connections with the former military.  While the opposition
may currently feel that they are the beneficiaries of rebel
activity, they may soon learn that "the enemy of my enemy is
not always my friend."  Archer is an experienced diplomat who
has studied Haiti at length. 

- - - -
COMMENT
- - - - 

6) (C) As reported reftels, The Bahamas is seized on the
Haitian crisis.  It is certainly Foreign Minister Mitchell's
dominant preoccupation.  It is also clear that The Bahamas
regards U.S. leadership and engagement on Haiti as crucial to
any peaceful outcome.  As has also become increasingly
explicit in Mitchell's recent statements, while The Bahamas
and CARICOM lobby for peace, they have concluded that a
peaceful outcome without international intervention is
increasingly unlikely.
WITAJEWSKI

HOLY SEE COMMITTED TO STABILITY FOR HAITI

UNCLAS VATICAN 000882 

SIPDIS 

SENSITIVE 

DEPT FOR EUR/WE (LEVIN); WHA/CAR 

E.O. 12958 N/A
TAGS: PREL PHUM HA VT
SUBJECT: HOLY SEE COMMITTED TO STABILITY FOR HAITI 

-------
SUMMARY
------- 

1.  (SBU) FOLLOWING ARISTIDE'S RESIGNATION AND DEPARTURE
FROM HAITI, THE HOLY SEE TOLD US THAT THE HAITIAN BISHOPS
    WERE READY TO WORK ACTIVELY WITH A PROVISIONAL
ADMINISTRATION TO HELP ENSURE A PEACEFUL TRANSITION OF
POWER.  THE SECRETARIAT OF STATE IS IN CLOSE CONTACT WITH
THE HAITIAN BISHOPS AND PAPAL NUNCIO IN PORT-AU-PRINCE, AND
HAS URGED THEM TO EXERT A CALMING INFLUENCE ON THE
POPULACE.  END SUMMARY. 

-----------------------------------------
BISHOPS READY TO WORK WITH NEW GOVERNMENT
----------------------------------------- 

2. (SBU) THE HOLY SEE'S DEPUTY FOREIGN MINISTER PIETRO
PAROLIN TOLD THE DCM MARCH 4 THAT THE HAITIAN BISHOPS AND
THE VATICAN NUNCIO WERE READY TO WORK WITH A NEW
TRANSITIONAL HAITIAN ADMINISTRATION TO ENSURE A PEACEFUL
RESTORATION OF ORDER.  PAROLIN SAID THE PAPAL NUNCIO TO
HAITI HAD BEEN IN ROME DURING THE HEIGHT OF THE CRISIS BUT
HAD NOW RETURNED TO PORT-AU-PRINCE WITH INSTRUCTIONS TO
HELP FACILITATE THE TRANSITION AND WORK WITH THE BISHOPS TO
ENCOURAGE CALM AND PATIENCE AMONG THE HAITIAN PEOPLE.  THE
DFM EXPRESSED INTEREST IN LATEST DEVELOPMENTS ON THE
GROUND, AND ASKED ABOUT THE NEWS REPORTS ABOUT ARISTIDE'S
CLAIMS OF BEING FORCED TO RESIGN, WHICH DCM EMPHASIZED HAD
NO BASIS IN FACT.  PAROLIN VOICED NO REGRET AT ARISTIDE'S
DEPARTURE, NOTING THAT THE FORMER PRIEST HAD BEEN AN ACTIVE
PROPONENT OF VOODOO. 

-------------------------
IT WAS TIME FOR HIM TO GO
------------------------- 

    3.  (SBU) EVEN BEFORE ARISTIDE'S DEPARTURE, POPE JOHN PAUL
II HAD APPEALED TO HAITIANS "TO MAKE THE COURAGEOUS
DECISIONS THEIR COUNTRY REQUIRED," AND HAD URGED THE
INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY AND AID ORGANIZATIONS TO DO WHAT
THEY COULD TO AVERT A GREATER CRISIS.  THIS WAS SEEN AS A
VEILED REFERENCE TO ARISTIDE'S LEAVING POWER.  SINCE
FEBRUARY 29, THE VATICAN HAS HAD NO OFFICIAL PUBLIC COMMENT
ON ARISTIDE'S RESIGNATION; HOWEVER, THE VATICAN'S CARIBBEAN
AFFAIRS DIRECTOR MONSIGNOR GIORGIO LINGUA SAID THAT THE
HOLY SEE SAW NO OTHER WAY OUT OF THE CRISIS AND THOUGHT THE
FORMER PRIEST HAD TO GO.  LINGUA SAID MARCH 3 THAT IT WAS
IMPORTANT THAT AN INTERNATIONAL FORCE QUICKLY RESTORE ORDER
IN HAITI SO THAT A PEACEFUL GOVERNMENTAL TRANSITION COULD
TAKE PLACE.  HE ADDED, HOWEVER, THAT A POLITICAL SOLUTION
SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED FROM OUTSIDE.  LINGUA SAID HE SAW
SEVERAL HOPEFUL SIGNS THAT THE TRANSITION COULD OCCUR
WITHOUT A BLOOD BATH, POINTING OUT THAT REBEL LEADER GUY
PHILIPPE SEEMED TO HAVE BEEN CONVINCED TO STAND DOWN AND
ESCHEW POLITICAL POWER IN LINE WITH HIS INITIAL PROMISE
THAT HIS SOLDIERS WOULD COOPERATE WITH INTERNATIONAL
FORCES. 

-----------------------
CATHOLIC RELIEF AT RISK
----------------------- 

4.  (U) ROME-BASED MEDIA HAVE REPORTED THAT CATHOLIC CHURCH
RELIEF ORGANIZATIONS, INCLUDING U.S.-BASED CATHOLIC RELIEF
SERVICES (CRS) HAVE SUFFERED CONSIDERABLE LOSSES OF FOOD
STOCKS AND VEHICLES BECAUSE OF LOOTING -- WHICH CRS
OFFICIALS REPORT IS CONTINUING.  DFM PAROLIN NOTED THAT THE
    HOLY SEE WOULD APPRECIATE INTERNATIONAL SUPPORT TO RESTART
THE RELIEF PIPELINES AND GET THE NEEDED FOOD AND SUPPLIES
OUT TO THE PEOPLE IN NEED. 

NICHOLSON

CONFIDENTIAL: CARICOM SURPRISED, UPSET, BUT NOT ANGRY BEING LEFT

C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 NASSAU 000487 

SIPDIS 

NSC FOR TOM SHANNON 

E.O. 12958: DECL: 03/09/2014
TAGS: PREL PGOV SMIG HA BF
SUBJECT: CARICOM SURPRISED, UPSET, BUT NOT ANGRY BEING LEFT
OUT OF ARISTIDE'S DEPARTURE 

Classified By: CHARGE ROBERT M. WITAJEWSKI FOR REASONS 1.4 (B) AND (D). 

SUMMARY
- - - - 

1.  (C) Charge and Political Officer met with the Bahamian
Ambassador to Haiti, Dr. Eugene Newry, and the Under
Secretary in the Consular Section at the Ministry of Foreign
Affairs and Bahamian-Haitian expert, Mr. Carlton Wright, on
March 8, 2004 to discuss Bahamian views of the current
situation in Haiti.  Ambassador Newry claimed that Caricom is
not "angry" with the U.S. involvement in the departure of
Aristide, but rather was "surprised" by the abrupt
decision-making, and Caricom's lack of involvement.  Newry
downplayed incendiary phrases in Caricom's statement on Haiti
such as expressing "alarm and dismay" as matter-of-fact
descriptions of members' disappointment, but on a positive
note he was quick to say that Caricom will be satisfied as
long as their 10-point action plan remains the basis for
post-Aristide Haiti and is implemented "as quickly and
painlessly as possible." Only history, declared Newry, can
determine whether or not ex-President Aristide left
voluntarily, because neither he (i.e., The Bahamas) nor his
regional colleagues were involved in that process. Bahamian
officials were extremely complimentary and positive about
joint U.S.-Bahamian efforts to deter or interdict intending
Haitian immigrants.
END SUMMARY. 

"LIKE A RIVER, THINGS MUST MOVE ON"
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 

2.  (C) At a meeting with the Charge, Bahamian Ambassador to
Haiti, Dr. Eugene Newry, characterized Caricom's harshly
worded "Statement on the Situation in Haiti" as "frank," but
was not a message of "anger."  In fact, he said he and fellow
Bahamian officials were quite pleased that changes being
implemented now in Haiti, such as the Tripartite Council and
the Council of Eminent Persons, come straight from the
10-Point Caricom Plan for Haiti.  In Newry's opinion, the
only place in which Caricom has disagreed with the Opposition
was in its desire for the Democratic Platform to be the only
political group. 

3.  (C) Although Ambassador Newry suggested that Caricom's
members were irritated with the lack of consultation and the
abruptness by which Aristide left office, he also indicated
that Caricom is pleased, nonetheless, that its plan is
apparently still being implemented.  As he put it, "a rose by
any other name is still a rose."  He said he will leave it to
the historians to determine what exactly happened on the
night Aristide fled Haiti.  However, he concluded, Caricom
needs to get over its pique because "like a river, things
must move on", and he understood that Haiti cannot advance
without the help that only the United States with the
ancillary support of other "major powers" such as Canada and
France could deliver. 

WHEN WILL CARICOM RE-ENGAGE?
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - 

4.  (C)  When asked at what The Bahamas would "re-engage" in
Haiti, Ambassador Newry ardently argued that neither Caricom
nor The Bahamas has ever "disengaged" from Haiti.  He
stressed that he only left Haiti for "consultations" with the
Bahamian Government, and that as the only Caricom ambassador
actually resident in Haiti, he plans to return "shortly."
When pressed, however, Ambassador Newry acknowledged that he
couldn't define a time frame.  But, he hastened to add, from
Nassau he was in "daily contact" with Ambassador Foley and
both pro-Aristide and opposition figures in Haiti. 

5.  (C)  From a personnel standpoint, Ambassador Newry
admitted that Caricom would not be involved in the initial
multinational interim force in Haiti, but said that Caricom
would be willing to participate -- if only symbolically -- in
the follow-on stabilization UN presence.  He thinks that this
stabilization phase could start as early as the next 60 days. 

INTERIM HAITIAN GOVERNMENT - NOT TOO SHABBY
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 

6.  (C)  Ambassador Newry told Charge and political officer
that he was pleasantly surprised with the transition now
occurring.  He indicated that it was a good sign that the
Haitian people overall had focused their mistrust and dislike
on the ex-President.  He said that his contacts with the
opposition has assured him that they would continue to work
with the Lavalas party and that the party itself had not been
tainted by the same image of corruption as was ex-President
Aristide.  Newry also found to be positive the fact that the
interim government retained some of the people closely
associated with ex-President Aristide in positions of power.
Ambassador Newry took this as a sign of good faith on the
part of the opposition. 

7.  (C) Discussing the composition of the interim authority,
Ambassador Newry was optimistic.  He knew personally and
professionally many of the members of the Tripartite
Committee as well as the Council of Eminent Persons and
considered them of high calibre.  He also considered it an
asset that these individuals were not predominantly
attorneys, but rather surgeons, sociologists, and other
professionals. 

8. (C)  The Bahamian representative in Haiti believed that it
would be premature to try to hold elections in the near
future.  In his view, he thought that it would take at least
90 days for the interim government to re-establish itself.
Newry did not believe that the country's political parties
would be prepared to hold meaningful elections for at least
twelve to eighteen months, at best. 

9.  (C)  Asked about the danger of the interim authority
using the period until elections to consolidate its power and
thereby arrange to win the forthcoming elections, Ambassador
Newry said that this had been anticipated by Caricom in its
action plan.  As a consequence, one of the key elements in
Caricom's action plan was a stipulation that no one in the
transitional government in Haiti can run for office once the
permanent government is established.  Ambassador Newry saw
this provision as a "sign of maturity" and a way to  prevent
innumerable problems. 

U.S.- BAHAMIAN COOPERATION
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - 

10. (C)  Turning to U.S.-Bahamian cooperation to prevent an
outflow of Haitian migrants to either The Bahamas or to the
United States, the Bahamian Foreign Ministry officials were
effusive in their praise of the current effort. The U.S., and
Bahamian, presence in the Windward Passage had "never been so
successful" in deterring an outflow of illegal migrants,
Newry declared.  While noting the costs of such an on-going
operation, both Newry and Wright acknowledged that it was
still much less expensive for The Bahamas that would be the
total costs of detaining, maintaining, and then re-patriating
illegal Haitian migrants once they reached The Bahamas. 

COMMENT
- - - - 

10.  (C)  Ambassador Newry was perhaps overreaching in trying
to put a positive spin on Caricom's March 3 statement on
Haiti and reflecting more of the real politik position that
The Bahamas takes regarding Haitian migration than the more
ideological position of some of the other, less affected,
Caricom members. Newry has also briefed both the Prime
Minister and the Cabinet en banc on the situation in Haiti
and his effusive praise of U.S.-Bahamian cooperation in the
Windward Passage reflects the realism of Prime Minister Perry
Christie and Deputy Prime Minister Cynthia Pratt than Foreign
Minister Fred Mitchell.  Surprisingly, Newry downplayed
ex-President Aristide's attempt to remain engaged from afar.
He did not think that Aristide's attempts to regain support
via press encounters in the Central African Republic would
impact on future Haiti developments.  His one caveat was that
Aristide's Lavalas Party is still extremely organized,
especially relative to the loose coalition of opposition
"parties" united only by a negative...their opposition to
Aristide.  His fear was that Aristide's support network would
re-group in time for the next set of elections while the
Opposition coalition would fall apart fall once the "negative
force," i.e., Aristide, disappeared from the scene as an
effective player.
WITAJEWSKI

NIGERIA OFFERS ARISTIDE A “STAGING POST”

UNCLAS ABUJA 000506 

SIPDIS 

SENSITIVE 

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PREL HA NI
SUBJECT: NIGERIA OFFERS ARISTIDE A "STAGING POST" FOR A FEW
WEEKS 

SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED, NOT FOR PUBLICATION ON THE
INTERNET OR INTRANET. 

1. (SBU) In response to what it said was a request from the
Caribbean Economic Community (CARICOM), on March 22 the GON
offered Haitian ex-president Aristide refuge in Nigeria for a
few weeks before moving on to another destination.  President
Obasanjo's press spokesman, Oluremi ("Remi") Oyo, issued a
press release (text below) to that effect and said much the
same thing in interviews carried by BBC radio and other
outlets. 

2. (SBU) The press release says the GON agreed after
consultations with African leaders, the African Union
leadership, the USG and "other concerned authorities."  Staff
at the Foreign Ministry and at the office of the National
Security Advisor told us March 23 they learned of the offer
from the press, and know nothing about such consultations.
The Presidency told us Aristide has not yet responded to the
offer (as of noon March 23), and said it had no information
on the USG and other consultations mentioned in the press
release. 

3. (SBU) COMMENT:  Two items seem important:  Will Aristide
come, and if so under what terms?  Confusion over what was
agreed when Charles Taylor came to Nigeria has long been a
problem.  Taylor is not the only political exile in Nigeria,
which has a history of offering asylum to fleeing leaders.
Post requests guidance from the Department on discussing
Aristide with the GON, and talking points for the public on
whatever USG role there may or may not have been in the
Nigerian offer to Aristide. 

4. (U) Begin text of the Nigerian Presidency press release: 

NIGERIA GRANTS CARICOM REQUEST ON FORMER HAITIAN LEADER 

The Caribbean Economic Community (CARICOM) under the
leadership of Prime Minister P.J. Patterson of Jamaica, has
requested Nigeria to consider giving former President
Jean-Bertrand Aristide of Haiti "a staging post" for a few
weeks until his movement to another destination. 

After receiving the CARICOM request, Nigeria undertook
widespread consultations with African leaders, the leadership
of the African Union, the U.S. Government and other concerned
authorities. 

Following the concurrence received after those consultations,
Nigeria has agreed to grant the request from CARICOM. 

Oluremi Oyo (Mrs.)
SSA to the President 

end text.
ROBERTS

CONFIDENTIAL:BAHAMIAN PERSPECTIVE ON CARICOM AND HAITI

C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 03 NASSAU 000733 

SIPDIS 

E.O. 12958: DECL: 04/06/2014
TAGS: PREL PGOV PHSA HA BF CARICOM
SUBJECT: BAHAMIAN PERSPECTIVE ON CARICOM AND HAITI 

REF: SECSTATE 71329 

Classified By: Charge Robert M. Witajewski for Reasons 1.4 (b) and (d). 

SUMMARY
- - - - - - - - - 

1.    (C) Charge hosted a lunch for the Bahamian Foreign
Minister Fred Mitchell, and Foreign Ministry Permanent
Secretary, Ms. Patricia Rodgers on March 29.  A/DCM and
Consular Section Head also participated.  The discussion
covered a number of topics: The dynamics of
recently-completed Caricom heads of government
inter-sessional meeting, Caricom-U.S. relations, status of
Bahamian ratification of the bilateral Comprehensive Maritime
Agreement (CMA), the status of ex-Haitian President Jean
Bertrand Aristide, and Caricom,s request of UN investigation
of the events related to Aristide,s resignation and
departure from Haiti.
End of Summary 

CARICOM INTER-SESSIONAL MEETING IN ST. KITTS
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - 

2.     (C) The Charge began the discussion by asking Foreign
Minister Mitchell "How did the meeting go in St. Kitts?"
Mitchell responded that Caricom,s statement reflected the
aggregate view of Caricom members, however he continued, the
Bahamas maintains its own views on these matters.  Mitchell
revealed a bit of internal Caricom dynamics in his response.
According to FM Mitchell, there was a definite "north-south"
division within Caricom on Haiti.  In contrast to the more
categorical positions taken by Grenada, Guyana, Surinam, and
Trinidad and Tobago, he claimed, the "northern Caribbean
countries"  who have more concrete interests  took  more
"considered" positions regarding Haiti because of their
geographic proximity.  The northern Caribbean countries, he
continued, are obliged to deal with the realities and are
also cognizant of the importance of their relations with the
United States and thus are more careful in balancing their
interests with Caricom and the U.S.  The southern Caribbean
members are more detached from the practical issues and are
guided by political agendas, according to the Bahamian
Foreign Minister. 

3.    (C) Continuing on the Haiti theme, Foreign Minister
Mitchell expressed the view that the United States
overreacted to Jamaica,s offer to let ex-President Aristide
reside in the country and to Caricom,s declarations.  He
appeared to be arguing that Caricom was entitled to express
its views and not necessarily be held accountable for them.
Mitchell also claimed that despite Caricom,s verbal shots at
the United States over recent events in Haiti, there would be
little net impact on overall U.S.-Caricom relations...as long
as the United States didn't "overreact." 

4.    (C) Expressing irritation at Caricom,s cumbersome
decision-making style, Mitchell complained that too much time
was wasted by the ceremonial opening and closing of the
sessions as each successive host felt compelled to spend time
and money on needless pomp and circumstance.  He also
expressed annoyance at the prolixity of his colleagues,
noting that had not each government head not insisted on
"getting their own paragraph" into the final declaration,
they might have both accomplished more and not have been
forced to hold their closing press conference at 2 a.m. in
the morning. 

CARICOM,S SPECIAL ENVOY AND CALLS FOR AN INVESTIGATION
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 

5.         (C) Regarding the naming of Caricom,s "special
envoy" to address the Haiti issue, Mitchell indicated that
Caricom had been unable to reach consensus on who this person
should be by the end of the inter-sessional and that this
would be subject to continued intra-Caricom negotiations.  He
said that personally hoped that it would be an individual who
both had prior diplomatic experience and someone closer to
The Bahamas, position on Haiti than that of some eastern
Caribbean states.  He discounted the prospect of anyone from
The Bahamas being selected for this role. 

6.    (C) Asked to clarify Caircom,s call for an
investigation into the circumstances of Aristide,s
resignation, Mitchell sought to downplay its significance.
He said that he personally envisioned the "investigation" as
equivalent to resolution of a "routine credentials challenge"
to a government such as occurs at the UNGA or another
committee.  If the LaTortue government is seen to be
exercising effective control in the country then, thought
Mitchell, it ought to be seated in Haiti,s chair at the UN
without controversy, Mitchell claimed.  He  explicitly sought
to minimize the scope, the impact, and the significance of
the Caricom-requested investigation -- but without indicating
whether his views reflected a broader Caricom view, those of
the Bahamian Cabinet, or his own personal view of an exit
strategy out of Caricom's dilemma. 

7.    (C) Questioned about recognition of the LaTortue
government, FM Mitchell reiterated his previous statements
that most Caricom members, as does The Bahamas, follow the
"Estrada Doctrine" when it comes to recognition and rather
than making value or moral judgments about a government, will
recognize whomever exercises effective control in Haiti as
that country's legitimate government.  He assured the Charge
that The Bahamas would not break with its long-held policy of
dealing with any government in control in Haiti, pointing out
that bilateral relations between The Bahamas and Haiti had
never been suspended during the transition from Aristide to
LaTortue  Foreign Minister Mitchell complained that the press
has exaggerated the recognition controversy and that matters
were not as bad as they appeared to be.  He noted that
Haitian Prime Minister LaTortue had called him personally and
assured him that press reports on Haiti refusing to permit
the return of the Bahamian Ambassador to Haiti were totally
untrue.  Mitchell also cited repeated phone conversations
between LaTortue and Jamaica's Prime Minister P.J. Patterson,
who apparently had a close working relationship in the past,
as evidence that Caricom and the new Haitian government could
work together.  He said that he expected the Haitian
Ambassador to return to The Bahamas in the near future as
well. 

Ex-President Jean Aristide in Jamaica
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 

8.    (C) The Foreign Minister insisted that the United
States should not be concerned with, or opposed to,
Aristide,s presence in the Caribbean.  He argued that a
perceived "Banishing Policy" has racial and historical
overtones in the Caribbean that reminds inhabitants of the
region of slavery and past abuse.  The Charge inquired on
what would happen if Aristide were to meddle with Haitian
internal affairs and give his supporters the impression that
he is still a player in the future of Haiti.  Foreign
Minister Mitchell was emphatic that Jamaica will not allow
Aristide to play such an intrusive role and would "deal" with
Aristide if such a situation were to arise. 

COMPREHENSIVE MARITIME AGREEMENT
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - 

9.    (C) Queried about the status of ratification of the
comprehensive maritime agreement (CMA) that has now been
negotiated over the last 18 months, FM Mitchell reported that
due to the document,s significance and complexity it had
been decided to prepare a formal briefing to the entire
Cabinet.  Optimistically, Mitchell thought that this could
completed in two cabinet sessions over a two-week period.
Questioned about the need for such a time-consuming review of
what is essentially a codification and rationalization of
existing agreements, Mitchell again wistfully muse about how
the Bahamian cabinet decision-making process might be
improved.  He related that he had learned as a result of his
Caricom attendance that in other Commonwealth countries,
debate and intervention on issues in the cabinet is
restricted to their ministers whose portfolios are directly
impacted by the issue, or ministers that assert fundamental
issues of principle.  In contrast, Mitchell intimated, in the
Christie Cabinet of the Bahamas operates much less
efficiently since any minister can intervene and express a
view on any issue before the government. 

JOINT TASK FORCE MEETING
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 

10.   (C) Queried about his preferences for a date for the
next session of the Joint Task Force on Illegal Drug
Interdiction (JTF), Mitchell expressed agreement for an early
summer meeting in late May/early June.  He agreed with
Charge,s suggestion that the JTF would best be held
following ratification of the CMA and successful
implementation of a major anti-drug round-up that is being
planned for the near future so that participants could review
both past successes since the last JTF meeting and consider
specific goals to be accomplished for the coming year. 

COMMENT
 - - - - - - - - - - 

11.   (C) Foreign Minister Mitchell was his usual
business-like self during lunch as he pursued his agenda of
downplaying the consequences of a division between Caricom
and the United States on Haiti.  Underlying many of
Mitchell's arguments was the premise that Caricom/The Bahamas
as small countries take (and are entitled to take) principled
stands while the United States necessarily engages in real
politik. 

12.  (C)  Despite a life-long career as a politician in a
country were politics is personalized to the extreme, neither
kissing babies nor making small talk comes naturally to Fred
Mitchell.  He prefers to deal with agendas expeditiously and
then engage in philosophical discussions or reviews of
international relations drawing on his seminars at Harvard,s
Kennedy School.  Holding two time-consuming portfolio,s
(managing the civil service and foreign policy) is also
taking its toll on Mitchell,s private time.  Mitchell told
Charge a year ago that he hoped to write a twelve-chapter
(one chapter for each month of the year) book combining
policy, history, and personal ideology to be published on his
fifty-first birthday.  Ruefully, he admitted that he hasn,t
progress beyond chapter four.
WITAJEWSKI

WEISUNG 4 ZUM EINSATZ DER BUNDESWEHR – MEMO 4 ABOUT THE BUNDESWEHR

weisung-nrf-4

GEHEIMES PROTOKOLL ZUM ABLAUF DER LOVE PARADE 2011 – SECRET MEMO ABOUT THE PROJECTED COURSE OF THE LOVE PARADE IN 2011

loveparade2010_loveparade-2010-anlage-19-vertrauliches-ablaufkonzept-15-01-10

STRENG VERTRAULICH: INTERNES PAPIER DER DEUTSCHEN BANK ZUR KUNDENBETREUUNG

THE BILDERBERG GROUP HISTORY

bilderberg-history-1956

The Impact of the Financial Services Meltdown on The Global Economy And The Meltdown on The Global Economy And The Private Equity Private Equity Industry

The Impact of the Financial Services Meltdown on The Global Economy And The Meltdown on The Global Economy And The Private Equity Private Equity Industry

by David Rubenstein, Co- Founder, Carlyle Group

caryle-group-financial-crisis-2008

Günther Wallraff “Der Aufmacher” – Unzensiert

wallraff-aufmacher-unzensiert

Regierungsprogramm der CDU/ CSU 2009 – 2013 zum Downloaden

cdu-regierungsprogramm-2009-2013-entwurf

The 10 Most Influential Media People This Year (According To The TIME 100)

Time 100It’s that time of year again.

Time magazine has released the Time 100, its annual list of the 100 most influential people in the world, as it does every year, to be followed by a swanky party next week at the Time Warner Centre (to which I am told press are no longer allowed to attend).

Unlike its annual Person of the Year, Time doesn’t rank the Top 100, but merely lists them grouped in categories and pairs them with fun write-ups done by equally high profile people.

You can see the full list and accompanying write-ups here.

Julian Assange

Julian Assange

Give Time extra credit for their profile pairing on this one.  Here is Germaine Greer on Assange:The media were easily convinced that WikiLeaks was a person, and unaware of how vulnerable he really was, Assange played the part to the hilt. Egregious to the last, he is convinced that his prosecution for rape in the Swedish courts was engineered by vengeful U.S. intelligence, unable to grasp the plain fact that his callous treatment made two women angry enough to seek redress.

There were many scoops but few surprises amid what we learned from WikiLeaks. Regardless of what happens to Assange, which he will almost certainly not deserve, the construction of stateless, secure and indestructible Internet drop boxes cannot be undone. Secrets will never be safe again.

Michele Bachmann

Michele Bachmann

Rush Limbaugh: If she were liberal, she’d be celebrated from the mountaintops. But she’s conservative. So because she is smart, talented and accomplished and a natural leader — not to mention attractive — the left brands her as a flame-throwing lightweight. They underestimate her at their own risk.

Arianna Huffington

Arianna Huffington

 Belinda LuscombeIn 2005, with little more than her impregnable charm, thicket of friends and contacts and outsize chutzpah, she launched the golden goose of news websites (or of any business) — popular, adroit, cheap as chips to run and named after her.

Hung Huang

Hung Huang

Diane Von Furstenberg: These days Hung, 49, is hugely influential in Chinese culture, tweeting with humor and intelligence to 2.5 million people. She runs a fashion magazine called iLook, owns a store featuring Chinese designers and recently became the director of the first design museum in China…What makes Hung unique is that she understands America, its pragmatism and practices, yet she remains a true Chinese patriot.

Saad Mohsnei

Saad Mohsnei

Rupert Murdoch:  Through his ownership of newspaper and TV properties, he has become, without a doubt, the most influential media figure in Afghanistan and plays a big role in shaping public opinion there. He has shown great courage in publicly and strongly criticizing the Karzai government for corruption and incompetence. He hasn’t been afraid to show men and women on TV—a practice the Taliban did not allow.

Ayman Mohyeldin

Ayman Mohyeldin

Dan Rather: Many journalists did good work in Egypt at the country’s — and the region’s — historic turning point, but none matched Mohyeldin, 31. He put us in the middle of the action and took us behind the scenes…By dint of his experience, persistence and talent, he lifted the profile and reputation of the al-Jazeera network. And for one brief, shining moment, he was the best in the world.

Joe Scarborough

Joe Scarborough

Michael Bloomberg: As a group, cable-­television talk-show hosts are not exactly known for independent political analysis that is free of partisan favoritism, but that is exactly what makes Joe Scarborough, 48, so ­refreshing—and so important. Joe’s approach to politics is the same as mine: call ’em like you see ’em, and even if people don’t agree with you on every issue—and they won’t—they will respect you for being honest.

Hu Shuli

Hu Shuli

Adi Ignatius: After a dispute with her publisher, Hu left the magazine in 2009 and set up Caixin Century, now a paragon of reporting brilliance in China. In February it ran a commentary on Egypt that any savvy reader would link to China. “Autocracy creates turbulence,” it read, “democracy breeds peace.”

Oprah Winfrey

Oprah Winfrey

Ted Turner: She has not only made it to the top with the cards stacked against her, but she has ­also made extra­ordinary contributions to our global community through her philanthropic efforts.

Mark Zuckerberg

Mark Zuckerberg

Image: Ap

April Capone: I never knew when I created a Facebook account to connect with friends, relatives and constituents that I would find one of my residents who needed a kidney. But there was Carlos Sanchez, like some sort of cyberspace SOS on my NewsFeed, contacting as many people as he could to find a new chance at life….Would I have been his donor without Facebook? We’ll never know. But Facebook allowed me to sit quietly in my office and say to myself, You’re up! Answer this call!

Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com/time-100-assange-zuckerberg-oprah-100-2011-4?op=1#ixzz1TcEB50FE

CONFIDENTIAL: DOMINICAN POLITICS #8: FERNANDEZ, THE RIO GROUP

Viewing cable 04SANTODOMINGO6213, DOMINICAN POLITICS #8: FERNANDEZ, THE RIO GROUP

C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 04 SANTO DOMINGO 006213 

SIPDIS 

STATE FOR WHA, WHA/CAR, WHA/EPSC, INL;
NSC FOR SHANNON AND MADISON;LABOR FOR ILAB; USCINCSO ALSO
FOR POLAD;TREASURY FOR OASIA-LCARTER;
USDOC FOR 4322/ITA/MAC/WH/CARIBBEAN BASIN DIVISION
USDOC FOR 3134/ITA/USFCS/RD/WH; DHS FOR CIS-CARLOS ITURREGUI 

E.O. 12958: DECL: 11/08/2014
TAGS: DR ENRG HA PGOV PREL
SUBJECT: DOMINICAN POLITICS #8: FERNANDEZ, THE RIO GROUP
AND HAITI 

REF: STATE 243180 

Classified By: DCM Lisa Kubiske.  Reason: 1.4 (b) and (d). 

1.  (C) Summary.  When the Rio Group summit of November 4 got
to the agenda item on
Haiti, Dominican President Leonel Fernandez asked for
hemispheric help in
re-instilling democracy in that &narco-state,8 but he put a
big front wrong in
advocating the inclusion in the process of former president
Jean Bertrand
Aristide.  Following a November 6 conversation with the
Ambassador, Fernandez agreed that Aristide was distinct from
Lavalas, and said he meant to say that groups with broad
popular support needed to be included in the process.  The
Ambassador and several other ambassadors see President
Fernandez November 16 to discuss Haiti further, per reftel. 

2.  (C)  Dominicans are continually worried about the other
half of Hispaniola,
and with good reason -- perhaps a million Haitians reside in
the Dominican
Republic already, many of them undocumented.  The February
2004 hostilities in
Haiti did not cause any significant cross-border movements
but the Dominican
military temporarily reinforced the border and the Dominican
Congress
precipitately voiced its opposition to any eventual proposal
to establish
refugee camps on national territory. 

3. (C)   The official press release from the presidency
offers an account of the Dominican positions at the meeting.
(See para 4 below.)  It includes two
elements of concern two us:  a calculated reference to
Aristide and a quote
from Hugo Chavez blaming &a large part of the disorder in
that brother country8
on the United States.  Chief of staff Danilo Medina said that
the press release
was not cleared elsewhere in the palace.  See septel for
discussion of the Dominican-Venezuelan questions. 

4. (U)  Following is our informal translation of the release,
which played
extensively in the Dominican press: 

- - - - - - - - - - - 

(begin text) 

Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.  The presidents of Latin America
declared their
determination to provide concrete help to Haiti in
establishing a true
democratic order where institutions function and all
participants may be
brought together for a dialogue on the future of the country. 

Responding to a proposal by President Leonel Fernandez, the
heads of state and
government meeting at the XVIII Rio Group Summit agreed in
the need for the
re-establishment in Haiti of peaceful coexistence and
institutional order, so
that in the future a constitutional convention may be
assembled. 

President Fernandez, who offered an analysis of the
historical roots of Haiti,s
ingovernability, stated that in that Caribbean nation there
exists a power
vacuum and a great scarcity as a clandestine economy
functions based on
narcotics trafficking. 

&Haiti, a theme of discussion of the Latin American leaders
participating in
this summit, is a narco-state subjugated to poverty and human
degradation, such
that we the countries of Latin America have the historical
responsibility of
going to its aid,8 he emphasized. 

He said that within a democracy there should be participation
of all sectors,
and that in Haiti there is a political leader with great
popular support, Jean
Bertrand Aristide, who should be involved in the process for
a democratic
solution and establishment of stability and democracy. 

The Dominican leader called on the Rio Group to make a
profound analysis of the
Haitian situation, given this immense undertaking, so that
the presence of the
MINUSTAH can be transformed in a clear and decisive manner to
cooperate in
building a true state of laws. 

The Dominican president,s analysis of the Haitian crisis was
seconded and
approved by 11 of the presidents present, who in their
remarks expressed
support to the Dominican initiative seeking immediate support
for Haiti. 

President of Venezuela Hugo Chavez, who will visit the
Dominican republic this
Saturday, said, &We should go to the aid of Haiti, but a
great deal of the
fault for the disorder in that brother country lies with the
United States.8 

The president of Paraguay Nicanor Duarte said that countries
meeting here
should offer support for building a true democracy in haiti,
with sovereignty
and with respect for its cultural roots. 

The president of Panama Martin Torrijos backed the position
of the Dominican
leader and said that he was ready to offer cooperation in
elections, welcoming
the position of President Fernandez. 

At the same time, the Vice President of El Salvador, Ana
Vilma de Escobar,
spoke of the need to restore order and to organize a
constitutional convention
in which all participants can find consensus and will respect
the rules of the
game. 

&We should carry out a crusade to recover multi-lateralism,
so that we can work
at establishing order in Haiti, and then work in favor of a
civilized
co-existence where conversations about the future can
begin,8 commented the
president of Bolivia, Carlos Mesa.
When his turn came, the president of Guatemala, Eduardo Stein
Braillas,
affirmed that the efforts to assist the Caribbean nation
should be carried out
jointly with the United Nations, but added the self-criticism
that the
countries of Latin America did not take decisions concerning
that nation when
they faced the need to do so. 

Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, November 4, 2004.  Office of
Information, Press, and
Public Relations. 

(end text) 

- - - - - - - - - - - 

5. (C)  The Aristide comment appeared to come out of nowhere.
 Fernandez had
not previously discussed Aristide by name in conversations
with us, or with our French and Canadian counterparts. 

6. (C) Perhaps the greatest surprise for us was the palace's
presumption that
there would be no downside.  The next-day in-house press
analysis by
Fernandez's strategy unit concluded that there was "no risk"
associated with
his comments and that Fernandez was "presenting himself as an
element of
international cooperation." 

Fernandez Backtracks
- - - - - - - - - - 

7. (C) On November 6, during a pull-aside at a social event,
the Ambassador admonished Fernandez that his reference to
Aristide was a serious mistake, one
that had the potential of further inflaming a situation
already dangerous for
the Haitian people and for the international peacekeeping
force.  Fernandez
replied that given popular support for Lavalas, it would have
to be part of the
situation.  The Ambassador was direct: Aristide had led a
violent gang involved
in narcotics trafficking and had squandered any credibility
he formerly may
have had.  "Nobody has given me any information about that,"
Fernandez
replied.  The Ambassador insisted that no supporter of human
rights and
democracy could in good conscience allow Aristide and his
close supporters back
into the situation in Haiti.  Fernandez listened and
eventually agreed to
distinguish between Aristide and Lavalas.  He asked for any
information on
Aristide that the United States might be able to share with
him. 

7. (C) On November 9 the Ambassador, DCM and EcoPol chief
questioned
presidential chief of staff Danilo Medina about the reference
to Aristide.
Medina suggested that the President hadn't meant Aristide,
but rather the
Lavalas political movement; the Ambassador questioned that
interpretation.
Emboffs pointed out that Aristide had been named in the press
release and
questioned the inclusion in a Dominican press release of the
anti-U.S. remark
by Chavez.  Medina professed not to have seen or cleared the
release, which had
been drafted by the press office. He said that in future,
press texts would be
routed through his office before release. 

8.  (C)  The Ambassador meets with President Fernandez  to
discuss Haiti (using reftel talking points) on the evening of
November 16, accompanied by the French, Canadian, British and
Spanish ambassadors.  We will report septel on the results of
that discussion.
HERTELL

CONFIDENTIAL: LAVALAS TORN BETWEEN BOYCOTTING ELECTIONS AND

Viewing cable 05PORTAUPRINCE776, LAVALAS TORN BETWEEN BOYCOTTING ELECTIONS AND

C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 04 PORT AU PRINCE 000776 

SIPDIS 

SOUTHCOM ALSO FOR POLAD
WHA ALSO FOR USOAS 

E.O. 12958: DECL: 03/07/2015
TAGS: PGOV PREL HA
SUBJECT: LAVALAS TORN BETWEEN BOYCOTTING ELECTIONS AND
MOVING FORWARD 

Classified By: Ambassador James B. Foley, reasons 1.4 (B) and (D) 

1. (C) Summary:  The Lavalas movement remains divided between
leaders who argue for moving beyond Aristide and
participating in elections this fall, and those who continue
to call for Aristide's return and threaten a boycott of
elections if their hard-line conditions are not met.  The
division is not clear-cut.  There are indications that some
of the principal hard-liners are in fact interested in
participating in elections; this is especially true of Father
Gerard Jean-Juste, who has emerged as a hard-line leader.  A
group of Lavalas moderates around former PM Cherestal
continues to lay the groundwork for a new party that would
attempt to capture the Lavalas vote, but some of them still
hope to unite both factions under one umbrella.  The many
U.S.-based Lavalas members and "solidarity" activists
complicate the picture; they are pushing a tough boycott
position, but their distance from the process on the ground
is likely to limit their influence.  Aristide's shadow
continues to hang over the movement, with most people
defining their positions in relation to him and many trying
to use his name to rally for their position.  We anticipate
it will not be clear for several more months how and whether
the Lavalas movement -- either as Fanmi Lavalas or another
party, or both -- will be represented in the elections.  End
summary. 

2. (C) In the wake of Aristide's departure, the movement and
party he led are still trying to figure out their future.
The internal debates and public arguments have now begun to
focus on the concrete question of whether Lavalas should
participate in this fall's elections or boycott them
entirely.  The degree to which the Lavalas constituency
participates in the election will be a large factor in the
legitimacy of the elections, and we are therefore following
developments inside the movement closely.  Over the past
three weeks, we have spoken with a number of contacts --
Lavalas leaders, politicians from other parties, local
analysts, U.S.-based activists, and others -- to put together
a picture of the movement seven months ahead of the first
(local) elections. 

Elections yes, elections no
-------------------------- 

3. (C) The two main factions inside Lavalas can be outlined
fairly simply.  Broadly speaking, hard-liners reject the
legitimacy of the IGOH and electoral process and insist that
elections cannot take place until Aristide is returned to
power.  They focus on Fanmi Lavalas (FL) the registered
political party and insist that only FL represents the
legitimate Lavalas voice.  Father Gerard Jean-Juste, a
longtime Lavalas activist and priest, has emerged in recent
weeks as the most significant hard-line leader (spurred by
his imprisonment last fall and his visit earlier this year to
Aristide in South Africa).  He outlined his position at a
March 5-6 conference of Haitian political parties (reftel):
FL would boycott elections unless Aristide is returned to
power, political prisoners are released, "persecution" of
Lavalas partisans stops, and several other conditions are
fulfilled.  He reiterated these in a March 10 conversation
with PolCounselor, arguing that it was not only illegitimate
to participate in elections, it was also impossible, since FL
members could not meet or campaign safely.  The hard-line
position is shared, at least publicly, by the leadership of
the National Reflection Cell of Lavalas Popular
Organizations, by pro-Aristide activists in Bel-Air and other
neighborhoods of Port-au-Prince, and by pro-Aristide
activists in other parts of Haiti (e.g. Milot mayor
Jean-Charles Moise).  Some of these people are suspected of
being involved in the pro-Aristide violence that has occurred
in the capital since last fall. 

4. (C) Those in the moderate faction, more diverse and less
vocal, insist they want to participate in the elections, that
they represent the original spirit of the Lavalas movement,
and that FL itself has been discredited by Aristide and his
misgovernance.  The most significant group is coalescing
around former Prime Minister Jean-Marie Cherestal, who has
been quietly and cautiously preparing the groundwork to
launch a new "Lavalas Renewed" party (ref B).  Cherestal told
PolCounselor March 13 that he was satisfied with his progress
in building support and said he was not worried that
elections were only seven months away.  The party's basic
message to Haiti's poor majority would be that Aristide's
power had been a deceit; he was able to speak their language
and raise their expectations, but he had not been able to
deliver any true benefits to them.  Initial reactions to the
draft Lavalas Renewed manifest had been positive, and
Cherestal said he would soon "widen the circle" to bring more
in, including former Lavalas Senators and Deputies like
Gerald Gilles, Yvon Feuille, Rudy Heriveaux and others.  He
said he was still hesitant about some of the these since he
was not convinced they had fully distanced themselves from
Aristide, but he knew it was important to bring them in if
possible. 

5. (C) For their part, Feuille, Gilles, Heriveaux, and former
Chamber of Deputies President Yves Cristallin told us March
17 that they were still uncertain whether a new party was the
right direction.  Feuille was the most convinced, saying he
was committed to working with Cherestal, but he noted that
financial resources were extremely limited for building a new
party (a complaint not shared by Cherestal).  Gilles and
Heriveaux said they worried about violent reactions from
Aristide supporters, and also about the lack of funds.  All
noted with some pain that Cherestal had not kept them very
well informed about his activities. 

Hidden agendas make clarity difficult
------------------------------------- 

6. (C) This being Haiti, the division between hard-liners and
moderates is not precise.  In a political culture where
hidden agendas are the norm, several appear to be at work
inside the Lavalas movement; the most important of these may
be Jean-Juste's.  Despite his hard-line rhetoric, nearly
everyone we speak with is convinced that Jean-Juste in fact
wants to participate in the elections and sees himself as a
strong Presidential candidate.  MIDH President Marc Bazin
told us he came away from an early March meeting with
Jean-Juste convinced the priest was waiting until closer to
the elections to declare his candidacy.  Voltaire, who has
met frequently with Jean-Juste, also told us he believes
Jean-Juste is interested in running for President or, failing
that, in playing a power-broker role. 

7. (C) Whether all the "moderates" are really committed to
participating in elections is another question.  Cherestal's
suspicion of Gilles and Heriveaux is not without reason; both
have acknowledged publicly and privately their continuing
attachment to Aristide even as they portray themselves as
ready to move on, and Heriveaux told us he would rather
campaign with FL than with anybody else, even if Jean-Juste
were the standard-bearer. Voltaire says he supports
Cherestal, but he also describes himself as working to avoid
a split in the movement over elections and to bring the two
factions together.  Many in the movement see this as
fence-straddling and dismiss him as an opportunist who has
managed to hold Ministerial positions nearly uninterruptedly
since 1990.  (Note:  We understand that Voltaire, an
architect by profession, has been considering an offer to
oversee the construction of the new airport in Caracas,
Venezuela. End note).  Another professed moderate (and
would-be presidential candidate), Jean-Claude Desgranges, was
Aristide's last chief of staff and is married to a reportedly
hard-line pro-Aristide FL activist who resides in Florida;
Cherestal, among others, questions his "moderate"
credentials. 

Electoral strategies for the post-Aristide era
-------------------------------------------- 

8. (C) For most of the 1990's, the Lavalas movement
represented the (poor) majority of Haitian voters, and
Lavalas/FL could run on its own.  Defections from the
movement and disillusionment with Aristide's record have
diminished the electoral appeal of Fanmi Lavalas, but to a
degree that is unclear.  Polling data from August 2004 showed
that 8% of Haitians support FL, more than any other single
party but a far cry from the 20-40% (or even 80%) that many
Lavalas politicians insist the party enjoyed.  (That same
poll, however, showed that Aristide was still the only figure
in Haiti with a favorability rating above 50%.)  Thus it is
not surprising that all of our contacts acknowledge the need
for electoral alliances. 

9.  (C) Marc Bazin's MIDH party is most often cited as a
likely partner.  Voltaire called Bazin "one of Haiti's most
modern politicians" and said MIDH would give Lavalas
technical credibility that it currently lacked.  Cherestal,
too, said he hoped Bazin would join forces with his new
party, but worried that he would make common cause with the
hard-line faction instead.   Even Jean-Juste said that Bazin
had become very popular within the Lavalas base because of
his insistence on true reconciliation and his criticism of
the IGOH's perceived harsh approach to Lavalas.  Bazin
himself told PolCounselor in early March that he was very
interested in an alliance with Jean-Juste because of the
support it would bring him from the Lavalas base.  He
dismissed the possibility of an alliance with Cherestal's
party-in-formation, calling it "dead in the water."  (Note:
Bazin frankly acknowledged to the Ambassador that he hopes to
capitalize on the exclusion of Lavalas, especially the
moderates.  He would be highly unlikley to step aside in
favor of a Lavalas candidate.  End note.) Both MODEREH, the
party of former Lavalas Senators Dany Toussaint and Pierre
Sonson Prince, and KOMBA, the movement of former Lavalas
official Evans Lescouflair and peasant leader Chavannes
Jean-Baptiste, would appear to be potential allies of either
FL or a Cherestal-led moderate Lavalas party.  Each has
baggage though: Dany Toussaint is clouded by drug trafficking
allegations and Chavannes Jean-Baptiste is seen by many
hard-liners as a traitor to Lavalas. 

The U.S. faction
----------------- 

10. (C) In addition to the hard-line and moderate Lavalas
factions here in Haiti, there is in effect a third "faction"
with agendas and influence that play a significant role: the
U.S.-based community of staunchly pro-Aristide FL
members-in-exile and "solidarity" activists.  The former are
grouped together in the "FL Communications Commission"
(www.hayti.net) that asserts the exclusive right to speak on
behalf of the party.  Members include former FL interim
chairman Jonas Petit, former Interior Ministry Angelot Bell,
former government spokesman Mario Dupuy, former Aristide
advisor Maryse Narcisse, and former deputy Gilvert Angervil
(Yvon Feuille and Rudy Heriveaux are also members, but have
effectively been ostracized by the others).  The solidarity
activists come from a wide variety of organizations, many of
them with connections to the former Aristide government.
Many are grouped under the Let Haiti Live coalition
(www.lethaitilive.org) and have been sharply critical of the
IGOH and U.S. policy in Haiti.  We believe that some of them
are in regular contact with Aristide. 

11. (C) According to a well-placed contact inside this group,
there are regular consultations among key leaders of both
groups, leading hard-line figures in Haiti, including
Jean-Juste and OP leaders such as Lesly Farreau and Lesly
Gustave, and members of Aristide's entourage in South Africa.
 According to this same contact, the U.S.-based members
recently "decided" that Lavalas should boycott the elections
this fall and should be prepared for a long-term campaign to
destabilize and delegitimize the IGOH and the government
installed next February.  This group's distance from the
process on the ground, however, constricts its influence.  We
have seen clear indications, for example, that Jean-Juste has
refused to accept this "decision" and has insisted that
decisions be made by the people on the ground.  Nonetheless,
the U.S.-based activists will play an important role in
determining how and whether Lavalas participates in the
elections. 

The Aristide Shadow
--------------------- 

12. (C) Hanging over all of this is the shadow of Aristide,
who remains popular among much of the Lavalas popular base
and remains the legal head of the Fanmi Lavalas party.  Many
see Jean-Juste as Aristide's designate ("clone" according to
one businessman), and Jean-Juste has not shied away from
playing the "Titid" card with the faithful.  Even those who
say they are committed to moving beyond Aristide fear his
reach; Gilles, for example, makes no bones about his fear for
his physical safety if he is seen as "betraying" Aristide.
But overall we believe Aristide's influence is waning and it
is not clear he can influence events on the ground from South
Africa as much as many think.  Jean-Juste's relationship with
Aristide was never close and he gives the distinct impression
of someone looking for his own path.  Typically, Aristide has
not made his views on electoral participation known publicly,
leaving his options open for a decision either way. Clearly
his preferred outcome would be to disrupt the electoral
process; second-best would be to delegitimze the process and
the electoral results.  However, if it appears that a
successful and legitimate process is underway and cannot be
stopped, participation-by-proxy may become the course he
chooses, especially if he thinks a loyal Lavalas slate of
candidate could win. 

Comment
---------- 

13. (C) It will take several months for the differing
divisions and agendas within Lavalas to sort themselves out,
and the results could vary widely depending on a few key
variables.  First and foremost is what Aristide decides to
push and the degree to which he is successful.  Second is
what Jean-Juste does.  If he holds to the hard-line and calls
for a boycott, especially if he does it in the name of
Aristide, then many pro-Lavalas voters will likely heed his
call.   If this happens in the context of credible claims of
anti-Lavalas bias by election authorities and/or anti-Lavalas
violence by ex-FADH or other elements, this could call into
question the legitimacy of the election results.  A third
variable is how successful Cherestal and his group are in
formulating a compelling message for former Aristide voters.
(Related to this is whether corruption charges will be
brought against him that could take him entirely out of the
running; in the past ten days there have been murmurs in the
press of a series corruption-related arrest warrants being
prepared, including against Cherestal.)  Finally, there is
the possibility (which we cannot really judge at this point)
that former Lavalas President Rene Preval could enter the
fray.  Preval has been out of the political scene since he
left the Presidency in 2001, but of late has started meeting
with some political leaders.  At least a few observers
believe he is interested in getting involved and many tell us
he would be a more formidable Presidential candidate than
either Jean-Juste or Cherestal  For what it is worth,
Desgranges told us after meeting with Preval recently that
Preval said he is not going to run. 

14. (C) U.S. interests argue for encouraging the maximum
possible voter participation and the active involvement by
the full political spectrum, including the Lavalas sector.
We have made clear to all factions that we will support the
development of a democratic, modern Lavalas political
vehicle, whatever the name, as long as there is a clear break
with Aristide's legacy of violence and misrule.
FOLEY

A Different October Revolution: Dismantling the Iron Curtain in Eastern Europe

East German demonstrators take to the streets in Leipzig, October 9, 1989.

Washington, D.C., October 9, 2009 – Twenty years ago today, crowds of East German demonstrators took to the streets in Leipzig starting their own October revolution that would bring down the Berlin Wall a month later. Ironically, these massive peaceful crowds of about 70,000 people gathered in the streets and squares of Leipzig just two days after the celebrations of the 40th anniversary of the German Democratic Republic and the visit by Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev to Berlin. GDR leader Erich Honecker’s security forces were faced with a choice—to apply the Chinese Tiananmen model or to go along with their Soviet patron’s advice not to use force. They chose the latter, and several days later Honecker was sent to retirement and replaced with reform Communist Egon Krenz on October 17, 1989.

Soldiers removing barbed wire from the Austria-Hungray border.

To mark this anniversary, today the National Security Archive publishes the first in a series of document postings on the revolutions of 1989 in Eastern Europe. The documents come from the forthcoming book Masterpieces of History:  The Peaceful End of the Cold War in Europe, 1989, ed. by Svetlana Savranskaya, Thomas Blanton and Vladislav Zubok (Central European University Press, 2010), which grew out of the Archive’s groundbreaking conference on the end of the Cold War in Europe at Musgrove Conference Center in May 1998. The documents in the book include formerly top secret deliberations of Soviet, U.S. and East European decision makers, memoranda of conversations and intelligence estimates. Most of the documents are published here in English for the first time.

The documents show that the Berlin Wall actually started falling on March 3, 1989, when Hungarian Prime Minister Miklos Nemeth informed Soviet General Secretary Mikhail Gorbachev of the decision of the Hungarian Central Committee to “completely remove the electronic and technological defenses from the Western and Southern borders of Hungary.” The Soviet leader did not react negatively to the news, but rather just said that “we are also becoming more open.” This decision by the Hungarian reform communists and Gorbachev’s acceptance of it made the first crack in the Berlin Wall. In May, the first dismantling of technological defenses started on the southern border of Hungary. Over the summer, the Hungarians negotiated most actively with West German representatives and kept their Soviet ally informed, but tried to circumvent the East Germans. On August 19, Hungary organized its famous Pan-European picnic, where people were encouraged to come picnic along the Austria-Hungary border near Sopron. A section of border was opened and some East German citizens were able to escape to Austria. The fate of the Wall may well have been sealed on September 11, 1989, when the Hungarian reform Communist government of Miklos Nemeth took down its own iron curtain—the barbed wire on the border with Austria—thus allowing East Germans who were vacationing in Hungary or taking refuge in the West German Embassy to escape to the West.

These events provoked an outraged reaction from the East German government. By early September, they saw the possibility that the trickle of East Germans would turn into a real flood if Hungary opened its border completely. The German communists (SED) discussed the situation on September 5, looking for options to prevent the opening of the border. One of the options—following the traditional approach of the Brezhnev Doctrine—was to try to convene a meeting of foreign ministers of the socialist bloc to put pressure on the Hungarians. However, that option was opposed by the Soviet representatives. East German attempts to reach out to their Hungarian and Soviet counterparts were met with stalling tactics until the borders were finally open on September 11.

As the flood of East Germans through Hungary undermined what was left of the prestige and legitimacy of the Honecker regime, the German Democratic Republic was preparing to celebrate its 40th anniversary. Gorbachev reluctantly agreed to come and to meet with the SED Politburo. During the celebrations, East Germans overwhelmingly expressed their support for Gorbachev in sharp contrast to their opposition to Honecker, which was immediately noted in the mass media. In his conversations with Honecker and the Politburo members, Gorbachev tried to stick to his compromise line of not interfering in internal affairs of fraternal countries, but eventually he did just that by warning them that “life punishes those who come too late,” and telling them a story about old leaders who cannot push the cart any more. Those statements were correctly heard by the East German communists as a push from the Soviet general secretary to change their own leader, which they did on October 17.


Read the Documents
At this stage, the East German communist leadership is just catching up to the fact that the Hungarian communists have already decided–with some support from Moscow–to open their borders to the West.  The scenes of East Germans hiking en masse to the Austrian border and flocking to embassies in Prague and Budapest while awaiting train tickets to the West, would dramatically degrade what little GDR prestige remained from its higher-than-average living standards in the bloc.  In this record, we see the unvarnished discussions of the GDR leadership, featuring repeated attacks on the Hungarians for doing the bidding of the FRG, and “betraying socialism.”  This discussion takes place two months after Gorbachev’s candid conversations with Kohl whom he treated as a peer and partner to an extent that would have appalled the members of the SED, although some may have feared as much in light of evidence such as that cited below–that the Soviet Foreign Ministry is trying to prevent the GDR from calling a foreign ministers’ meeting to rein in the Hungarians.
In this discussion, East German Foreign Minister Oskar Fischer seeks reassurance from the Soviet ambassador to East Berlin in the midst of the refugee crisis precipitated by Hungary’s decision to open its border with Austria.  Ambassador Kochemassov tells Fischer that his colleagues are in fact actively rebuking both the West Germans and the Hungarians.  In particular, Moscow’s envoy to Bonn, Yuli Kvitsinsky, is a hard-line holdover who has been blasting the FRG for encouraging the East German émigrés, and “condemn[ing]” repeated statements by politicians to the effect that the GDR’s days are numbered.  The latter remark comes in the wake of highly-publicized comments by the U.S. ambassador to the FRG, Vernon Walters, in the International Herald Tribune predicting the speedy reunification of Germany.
This personal letter from the GDR’s man in Budapest to the foreign minister reports on his recent talks with Rezső Nyers.  Responding to East Berlin’s condemnation of Hungary’s émigré policy, Nyers claims that the border openings are “only a temporary measure.”  But Ambassador Gerd Vehres dismisses this and other comments from the Hungarians as “an attempt at stalling and deliberately misleading the GDR.”  Rather than understand the flight of so many East Germans as a popular judgment on the regime, the SED is only able to conceive it as “a coordinated and successful attempt by the imperialist states …”
This diary entry, written on the eve of Gorbachev’s visit to an East Germany in crisis, describes the Soviet leader as anxious and ambivalent about the radical changes underway in Eastern Europe, yet determined not to say anything that will prop up the hard-line Honecker.  Chernyaev knows what the drafters of American national security policy at this time do not, that “the total dismantling of socialism as a world phenomenon has been taking place”–and it is a spectacle Chernyaev applauds.  Here is striking proof of the profound radicalization of political thinking that is unfolding inside the reform-minded echelons of the Soviet political elite.  Chernyaev has by now resolved his personal doubts in favor of supporting the anti-communist “revolutions” in Eastern Europe.  However, while he clearly sees the future of the Soviet Union on the path of total rejection of the Leninist-Stalinist legacy, Gorbachev’s own thinking in this period is more complex and, unlike Chernyaev, is not completely free from the “syndrome of Leninism.” In particular, Gorbachev still seems to nurture an ideological belief in “democratic socialism” as a road for Eastern Europe, and the GDR in particular.
In his conversation with Erich Honecker, Gorbachev is careful and ambivalent trying not to openly push or provoke the East German leader, according to his proclaimed policy of non-interference in the allies’ internal affairs.  While the Soviet leader praises the GDR achievements and gently admonishes Honecker that the party should seize the initiative lest it becomes too late, Honecker is more assertive in his criticism of the Soviet glasnost and “unacceptable” publications in the Soviet press.  He presents the situation in his country as stable, his party in control and poised to achieve a breakthrough in the scientific and technological revolution.
When Gorbachev visits Berlin in early October, thousands of East Germans are already pressing to leave the GDR and demonstrations against the regime are taking place in Leipzig and elsewhere.  Chernyaev’s notes of the discussions with the SED Politburo show the Soviet leader actually pushing for leadership changes–contrary to his own repeated insistence about staying out of bloc “personnel” matters.  While not even mentioning the refugees, Gorbachev reminds the East Germans about the crises of the 1970s when the leadership felt the need to accelerate reforms.  “Life itself will punish us if we are late,” he says. He goes on to tell a story about the miners of Donetsk, where “some leaders cannot pull the cart any more, but we don’t dare replace them, we are afraid to offend them.”  There could hardly be a clearer reference to Honecker and, sure enough, within 10 days the SED Politburo replaces him with another of those present at this meeting, Egon Krenz.
Events are moving quickly in the GDR, marked by the beginning of maneuverings in the SED Politburo against Honecker.  Here Chernyaev records a conversation with Gorbachev and  Shakhnazarov in which the Soviet leader refers to Honecker with an obscenity for not stepping down gracefully and thus preserving “his place in history.”  Chernyaev and Shakhnazarov doubt a graceful exit is possible for the East German party boss, who “has already been cursed by his people.”


Notes

1. For most recent publications and  reviews about the peaceful revolution in Germany see Charles S. Maier, “Civil Resistance and Civil Society:  Lessons from the Collapse of the German Democratic Republic in 1989,” in Adam Roberts and Timothy Garton Ash ed., Civil Resistance and Power Politics (Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press, 2009),  Christof Wielepp, “Montag abens in Leipzig,” in Thomas Blanke and Rainer Erd (eds.), DDR-Ein Staat Vergeht (Frankfurt am Main: Fischer Taschenbuch verlag, 1990), Wolf-Jurgen Grabner, Christian Heinze, and Detlev Pollack (eds.), Leipzig in Oktober:  Kirchen und alternative Gruppen im Umbruch der DDR—Analysen zur Wende (Berlin: Wichern-Verlag, 1990).

DIE OFFIZIELLE LISTE DER SPITZEL IN DER TSCHECHOWSLOWAKEI ZUM DOWNLOADEN

Tom Moak: Der große Unterschied zwischen Aufarbeitung und Aufklärung

Aufarbeitung
Aufarbeitung oder Recycling bedeutet Gewinnung von Rohstoffen aus Abfällen,ihre Rückführungin den Wirtschaftskreislauf und die Verarbeitung zu neuen Produkten (stoffliche Verwertung).

Zur Aufarbeitung Recycling geeignet sind vor allem Lumpen, Eisen, Papier, Glas, Pappe,

Kartonagen, Nichteisenmetalle und Kunststoffe. Voraussetzung für die stoffliche Verwertung

ist eine möglichst sortenreine Sammlung der Wertstoffe oder ihre leichte Abtrennung (Sortierung,Abfalltrennung.)

Es hat den Anschein, einige der nach der deutschen Wiedervereinigung etablierten Institutionen, die angeblich das Unrecht

in der DDR aufarbeiten wollen oder sollen, wollen mit ihrer “Aufarbeitung” genau so den politischen Müll und die Abfälle

aus der ehemaligen DDR, das Unrecht und ihre Aktivisten zur Wiederverwendung recyceln und in unserer Gesellschaft installieren.

Dazu gehört auch eine mangelnde Aufklärung der Öffentlichkeit,(Desinformation) eine Verheimlichung der Täter und deren Untaten, die

zum Teil immer noch in verantwortlichen Funktionen Platz genommen haben und als Krönung des ganzen sogar in Parlamente eingeschleust wurden.

Aufklärung ist die vollständige Offenlegung des Unrechts, und die vollständige Information über die Schuldigen


und deren Entfernung aus verantwortlichen Funktionen.

Wahlspruch in 2011   zum Jahr der Demokratie

Aufklärung
Aufklärung ist der Ausgang des Menschen aus seiner selbst verschuldeten Unmündigkeit.

Unmündigkeit ist das Unvermögen des Menschen,  sich

seines Verstandes ohne Leitung eines Anderen zu bedienen.
Selbstverschuldet ist diese Unmündigkeit,  wenn die Ursache derselben

nicht am Mangel des Verstandes,  sondern der Entschließung und des

Mutes liegt,  sich seiner ohne Leitung eines anderen zu bedienen.
Sapere aude!
Habe Mut,  dich deines eigenen Verstandes zu bedienen

ist also der Wahlspruch der Aufklärung……
Immanuel Kant  –  Was ist Aufklärung?   Anno Domini 1783

. . und hier sind Beispiele der

Aufarbeitung
Bock zum Gärtner gemacht
TOP 1…sollen hier schon wieder Akten vernichtet werden ?

Na aber Hallo!…. die Nummer kennen wir doch schon “Lieber Politiker”


Aufklärung

Aufklärung ist die vollständige Offenlegung des Unrechts, die vollständige Information über die Schuldigen

und deren schonungslose Entfernung aus verantwortlichen Funktionen und dem öffentlichen Leben.

“Die öffentliche Diskussion über das Unrecht einer Diktatur wird diesmal unter Lebenden stattfinden!”

Wer seinerzeit für das MfS gearbeitet hat, war Helfer der öffentlichen Verwaltung,
mag er in der Diktatur das auch im verborgenen getan haben,

seine “Spitzeltätigkeit” gehört nicht zu seiner schützenswerten Privatsphäre.

” Die Betroffenen Opfer und die Öffentlichkeit haben ein Recht auf die Wahrheit! “

Somit bleibt nun zu hoffen das endlich alles klar ist!
Beispielhaft für die Aufklärung halten es die neuen Mitglieder in der Europa Union u. a. wie,

  • die Regierungen der Tschechischen Republik die auf der Homepage des Innenministeriums

in Prag die Namen der Täter und der Schuldigen per Gesetz zum Download bereit hält.

Evidenční podklady, zveřejněné podle §7 zák 107/2002Sb Download

·           und die Slowakischen Republik  die auf dem Regierungsserver per Gesetz

die Listen mit den Namen der Täter und Schuldigen veröffentlicht und zum

Download bereit hält.        Zum Beispiel hier: Bratislava
Regierungsserver der Slowakischen Republik Nation’s Memory Institute

CONFIDENTIAL: CANADA ON RUMORS OF ARISTIDE’S DESIRE TO RETURN

Bernd Pulch, Magister Artium (MA)

Viewing cable 05OTTAWA2023, CANADA ON RUMORS OF ARISTIDE’S DESIRE TO RETURN

C O N F I D E N T I A L OTTAWA 002023 

SIPDIS 

E.O. 12958: DECL: 07/05/2010
TAGS: BR HA PREL UNSC
SUBJECT: CANADA ON RUMORS OF ARISTIDE'S DESIRE TO RETURN TO
HAITI 

REF: SECSTATE 121144 

1. (C) DCM and PolOff shared reftel talking points with FAC
Director General for Latin America and the Caribbean Jamal
Khokhar and Caribbean and Central America Director Christian
Lapointe.  Khokhar said "we are on the same sheet" with
regards to Aristide, and Canada's consistent message has been
that "he is of the past and Haiti needs to move forward."
Khokhar said the GOC understands there is a plan by his
followers to bring Aristide back to Haiti on July 15th, but
does not have any clear signals of how it will be done.  Desk
Officer Caroline Ouellet clarified that the date is based on
rumors and there are no more signs than usual that it is
reality.  Still, they have heard the date from enough sources
to consider it credible.  Even before these recent rumors,
she said, Canada had a clear position in opposition to the
return of Aristide. 

2. (C) Khokhar said Canada has been conveying this message to
all parties, stressing the need for the international
community (especially the Caricom countries), to invest in
the future for Haiti and not remain stuck in the past.
Canadian officials note the call by SYG Annan for
reinforcements to provide security for the election and are
in agreement that the UN mission must be reinforced to be
effective. 

3. (C) Lapointe said that Canada has discussed the return of
Aristide with South African officials during consultations in
May.  The South Africans reportedly questioned whether it is
fair to encourage Lavalas to participate in the elections
without their most important leader being on the ground.
They are not convinced of the good will of those who would
exclude him being there.  The GOC reportedly urged the South
Africans to encourage Lavalas to move beyond Aristide, and
stressed the importance of finding a new leader in Haiti that
can unite the country rather than divide it.  Lapointe said
there may be an opportunity for FM Pettigrew to meet on the
margins of the G-8 meeting with the South African FM and
further stress these points. 

Visit Canada's Classified Web Site at
http://www.state.sgov.gov/p/wha/ottawa 

WILKINS

SECRET: VATICAN ON HAITI: CHURCH LOSSES AND RESPONSES

Magister Bernd Pulch

Viewing cable 10VATICAN11, VATICAN ON HAITI: CHURCH LOSSES AND RESPONSES

VZCZCXRO3140
OO RUEHDBU RUEHFL RUEHKW RUEHLA RUEHNP RUEHSL
DE RUEHROV #0011/01 0201644
ZNY SSSSS ZZH
O P 201644Z JAN 10
FM AMEMBASSY VATICAN
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 1239
RUEHPU/AMEMBASSY PORT AU PRINCE IMMEDIATE 0010
RUEHSA/AMEMBASSY PRETORIA IMMEDIATE 0011
INFO RUEHZL/EUROPEAN POLITICAL COLLECTIVE
RUEHZH/HAITI COLLECTIVE
RUEHCV/AMEMBASSY CARACAS PRIORITY 0032
RUEHBR/AMEMBASSY BRASILIA PRIORITY 0042
RUCNDT/USMISSION USUN NEW YORK PRIORITY 0126
RUEHGV/USMISSION GENEVA PRIORITY 0090
RUEHROV/AMEMBASSY VATICAN 1278
S E C R E T SECTION 01 OF 02 VATICAN 000011 

SIPDIS 

E.O. 12958: DECL:  1/20/2035
TAGS: EAID PREL SOCI PHUM KIRF VT HA
SUBJECT: VATICAN ON HAITI: CHURCH LOSSES AND RESPONSES 

REF: A. A) STATE 4807
     B. B) STATE 4854
     C. C) VATICAN 10
     D. D) KELLY-NOYES EMAILS 1/16-19/10
     E. E) STATE 5277 

VATICAN 00000011  001.2 OF 002 

CLASSIFIED BY: Julieta Valls Noyes, DCM, EXEC, State.
REASON: 1.4 (b), (d)

1.  (S) Summary:  While devastating, the Church suffered fewer
losses in the Haiti earthquake than initially reported in the
media.  The death of the Archbishop and many seminarians were
especially painful but the Vatican is already reviewing how to
regroup: Bishop Pierre Dumas, President of Caritas Haiti, could
become the new Archbishop.  Meanwhile, the Nuncio in PAP is
working with Haitian bishops, and with international missionary
and other Catholic organizations, to provide humanitarian aid
and pastoral care to the victims (see also ref c).  Catholic aid
organizations have already pledged over $50 million in aid and
raised over $13 million in donations; these numbers will
increase.  On a related note, the Vatican is concerned about
future operating funds for the Haitian embassy accredited to the
Holy See.  On the political front, the Vatican believes the
return of deposed Haitian leader (and former priest) Aristide
would be disastrous and is trying to get a quiet message to him
and/or his confidantes to this effect.  Holy See officials have
repeatedly thanked Embassy Vatican for USG response to the
earthquake and for coordination with the Church on relief
efforts.  End summary. 

(SBU) Church Suffers Tragic but not Incapacitating Losses
--------------------------------------------- ------------ 

2. (U) According to FIDES, the media arm of the Holy See's
Congregation for the Evangelization of Peoples (which oversees
the Church's work in Haiti), while Catholic congregations and
organizations in Haiti suffered deeply tragic losses during the
earthquake, these were not as overwhelming as initial media
reports indicated.  Specifically, the known losses to date
include: 

-- Archbishop Serge Miot
-- Monfort Missionaries:  11 dead; infrastructure damaged
-- Salesians: 3 dead priests plus 500 students or seminarians
killed; infrastructure destroyed or damaged
-- Daughters of Wisdom: 3 dead, 3 missing and presumed dead
-- Spiritan Fathers: 1 dead
-- Oblates: 1 dead; damage to buildings and centers
-- Holy Cross Fathers: 1 dead
-- Dominicans: no deaths, 1 nun injured
-- Franciscans: no known deaths or injuries; convent and schools
destroyed 

However, the Council of Latin American Bishops Conferences
reports over 100 members of religious orders still missing and
presumed dead.  The good news is that the Christian Brothers and
Camillan order had no losses, and the Jesuits also lost no-one
and suffered no damage to their buildings.  (Note:  For context,
the Vatican has informed the Embassy that before the earthquake,
the Haitian Church had eighteen bishops in ten dioceses, 486
diocesan priests, 306 religious orders priests, 332 non-priest
male religious (monks and friars), 1,851 female religious
(nuns), and 421 seminarians.) 

3. (SBU) The Vatican's Secretariat of State official in charge
of Central America, Monsignor Francisco Frojan, told polchief on
January 19 that the death of the Archbishop of PAP had been a
hard blow to the Church.   Embassy understands that Bishop
Pierre Dumas, President of Caritas Haiti, could become the new
Archbishop. 

4. (C) The earthquake also killed the sister of the Cardinal
Archbishop of Sao Paolo: she was in PAP giving a conference when
the earthquake hit.  (Some seminarians and other religious
personnel at that event were also killed.)  At the same time,
Frojan added that the Vatican was fortunate the Nunciature had
not been damaged, and thus has become a shelter and meeting
point for bishops, clergy and missionaries.  No Vatican official
other than the Nuncio himself were in PAP at the time of the
earthquake. 

(U) Vatican Is Responding to Crisis
----------------------------------- 

5. (U) Polchief delivered refs A and B points to Frojan on
January 19 and offered USG support should the Vatican require
assistance in getting humanitarian supplies to Haiti.  While the
Vatican does not own any planes, Frojan had received questions
about flights to Haiti from organizations wishing to assist, and
thanked polchief for the information.  Frojan said Cor Unum --
the Vatican's umbrella organization for humanitarian work -- and
Caritas Internationalis have the lead on relief efforts (ref C),
and are coordinating donations from a wide range of Catholic
charities.  For example, U.S.-based Catholic Relief Services (a
Caritas organization) has already pledged $25 million and raised
over $13 million in donations for Haiti, and Caritas
Internationalis is contributing an additional $25 million.
These numbers will go up. 

6. (SBU) Beyond the influx of new aid, Frojan noted that before
the earthquake the Catholic Church throughout Haiti had managed
26 hospitals, 213 health dispensaries, 4 leprosy health centers,
23 homes for the elderly and the chronically ill and 39
orphanages.  Many of these institutions are still functional in
the affected areas and are providing assistance.  The Camillan
priests and nuns, for example, ran a hospital in PAP that was
undamaged and they are now treating the injured.  Operating
information on other institutions is trickling in to the
Vatican, but it is still incomplete.  (Note: According to the
Vatican, there are about 7 million Catholics in Haiti - 70% of
the population.  Another 23% of the population adheres to other
Christian denominations.  End Note) 

7. (C) The Vatican's Chief of Protocol, Msgr. Fortunatus
Nwachuku, raised another concern with Ambassador Diaz regarding
Haiti.  The Haitian Embassy to the Holy See, probably like those
elsewhere, has a very tight budget and cannot sustain operations
for long without renewed funding from Port au Prince.  Moreover,
the Haitian Ambassador has confided to his Canadian colleague
here that the embassy can get by for a little longer, but the
embassy's situation is unsustainable for long.  Nwachuku asked
whether any aid programs currently included funding for Haitian
embassies. 

(S) Aristide's Return Would be Disastrous
----------------------------------------- 

8. (S) In discussions with DCM over the past few days (ref d),
senior Vatican officials said they were dismayed about media
reports that deposed Haitian leader -- and former priest -- Jean
Bertrand Aristide wished to return to Haiti.  (Aristide now
lives in South Africa.)  The Vatican's Assesor (deputy chief of
staff equivalent), Msgr. Peter Wells, said Aristide's presence
would distract from the relief efforts and could become
destabilizing.  Following a conversation with DCM, the
Undersecretary for Relations with States (deputy foreign
minister equivalent), Msgr. Ettore Balestrero, conferred with
the Vatican nuncio in Haiti.  Archbishop Auza agreed
emphatically that Aristide's return would be a disaster.  He
said he would ask local bishops if any of them still had
positive enough relations with Aristide to persuade him to stay
away.  Balestrero then conveyed Auza's views to Archbishop
Greene in South Africa, and asked him also to look for ways to
get this message convincingly to Aristide.  DCM suggested that
Greene also convey this message to the SAG.  Embassy will report
the results of this Vatican outreach once they are available. 

(U) Comment: The Church is On the Case
-------------------------------------- 

9. (C) Normally contemplative and deliberately slow to act in
political crises, the Vatican and Church-related organizations
are responsive and effective when dealing with humanitarian
disasters.  Its global network of aid organizations and local
Church entities provide a well-organized and reasonably
well-funded structure to deliver assistance.  Moreover, despite
concerns elsewhere (ref e), the Vatican is very appreciative of
USG aid to Haiti.  Holy See officials have thanked Embassy
Vatican officials repeatedly this week for USG assistance to
Haiti and for the Embassy's close coordination with the Holy See
and Church organizations on relief efforts.  They say on-the
ground liaison with Caritas and with the nuncio would also be
useful.  Embassy Vatican will continue outreach at all levels to
continue to get out the message about USG efforts. 

10.  (C) PORT-AU-PRINCE MINIMIZE CONSIDERED.
DIAZ

CONFIDENTIAL: OPPOSITION JOURNALIST DETAILED UNDER THE INTERNAL SECURITY ACT

Magister Bernd Pulch

Viewing cable 08KUALALUMPUR806, OPPOSITION JOURNALIST DETAILED UNDER THE INTERNAL SECURITY ACT

VZCZCXRO1610
OO RUEHCHI RUEHDT RUEHHM RUEHNH
DE RUEHKL #0806/01 2561240
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
O 121240Z SEP 08
FM AMEMBASSY KUALA LUMPUR
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 1642
INFO RUCNASE/ASEAN MEMBER COLLECTIVE PRIORITY
RHEHNSC/NSC WASHDC PRIORITY
RHHMUNA/CDR USPACOM HONOLULU HI PRIORITY
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 KUALA LUMPUR 000806 

SIPDIS 

FOR EAP/MTS 

E.O. 12958: DECL: 09/12/2018
TAGS: PGOV KDEM MY
SUBJECT: OPPOSITION JOURNALIST DETAILED UNDER THE INTERNAL SECURITY ACT 

REF: KUALA LUMPUR 787 

Classified By: Political Section Chief Mark D. Clark, reason 1.4 (b and
 d). 

1.  (C) Summary:  Malaysian police on September 12 arrested
controversial blogger Raja Petra Kamaruddin under the
Internal Security Act (ISA), which allows for detention
without trial.  Raja Petra's arrest came days after Prime
Minister Abdullah threatened to use the ISA to clamp down on
those allegedly stoking racial and religious tensions.  The
arrest stands as a warning to the growing Internet media, but
also sends a signal to the political Opposition, which has
vowed to topple Abdullah's coalition later this month, that
the UMNO-led government could take stern measures to defend
itself.  End Summary. 

2. (SBU) Malaysian police detained Raja Petra Kamaruddin,
prominent blogger and editor of the controversial website
"Malaysia Today", under the Internal Security Act (ISA) on
September 12.  The ISA allows for detention without trial.
This is the first time the Act has been implemented for
blogging.  Raja Petra's detention came days after Prime
Minister Abdullah Badawi told reporters that the government
would use the ISA on those who stoke racial and religious
tensions, following inter-racial feuding in this coalition
and mounting challenges to Abdullah's authority and political
position (Septel). 

3. (U) Home Minister Syed Hamid Albar, who approved Raja
Petra's ISA detention order, told reporters that the blogger
was detained under Section 73(1) of the ISA because he was
deemed a threat to security, peace, and public order.  The
Minister explained that Raja Petra's detention came in the
wake of various statements published by him in his blog
"Malaysia Today," the latest being a commentary which
allegedly ridiculed Islam and the Prophet Muhammad.  Syed
Hamid stated, "We have called and advised him many times
following the publishing of his statements but he has
continued to write, so much so that they (the statements)
could pose a threat (to security and public order)."  The
Minister added that under Section 73(1) of the Act, Raja
Petra would be detained for 60 days and the police will do an
assessment during the period.  Syed Hamid added "if they feel
he should be held more than 60 days, the police will then
refer to me".  Traditionally the minister will accept the
recommendations made by the police and sign the order under
Section 8(1) of the Act, which allows the person to be
detained for renewable two-year periods.
4. (U) This is the second time Raja Petra has been detained
under the ISA.  The government of then Prime Minister
Mahathir detained Raja Petra under the ISA in April 2001 for
his involvement in former DPM Anwar Ibrahim initiated
"reformasi" movement.  He was held for 53 days before being
unconditionally released, reportedly due to pressure from the
King, the late Sultan of Selangor who was Raja Petra,s
uncle.  The current Sultan of Selangor is his cousin. 

5. (U) Raja Petra's arrest came a day after the Cabinet
ordered the Multimedia and Communications Commission (MCMC)
to re-instate access to all blocked websites, including Raja
Petra's "Malaysia Today" website (which was blocked on August
27).  Energy, Water and Com-mu-nications Minister Shaziman
Abu Mansor stated on September 12 that the Cabinet ordered
the move because there were other "harsher" laws in the
country, including the ISA, to "control the irresponsible
dissemination of information over the Internet and to bring
those irresponsible websites and blogs to book." 

6. (C) Comment:  Malaysia's on-line news sources and blogs
have blossomed over recent years as an alternative to the
government dominated mainstream media.  This trend has only
increased after the March 8 elections, in which Abdullah and
his UMNO party suffered a major setback.  Raja Petra is
considered the most outspoken and controversial Internet
journalist, and is often a proponent of opposition views.
Aside from his ISA arrest, Raja Petra faces sedition charges
for articles implicating Deputy Prime Minister Najib in an
ongoing high profile murder case.  Raja Petra's
arrest is another sign of insecurity on the part of Abdullah
and the UMNO party.  The government's use of ISA sends a
strong warning to other opposition bloggers to curb their
activities.  This arrest may intimidate some activists, but
it also could result in a backlash by the independent media
and bloggers, and increase public disaffection with
Abdullah's leadership. 

7.  (C) As PM Abdullah and his UMNO party become increasingly
concerned over threats to bring down their government through
the crossover of 30 more BN members of Parliament, Raja
Petra's arrest also will be interpreted here as a warning to
the political opposition and its leader Anwar Ibrahim.
Opposition officials consistently have expressed concern that
the government could invoke ISA if they advance too far.
While not determinate given the fluid political situation and
UMNO's disarray, today's arrest of Raja Petra lends support
to the view that the UMNO-led government will take stern
measures to defend itself.  End Comment. 

8.  (U) The Embassy offers the following draft "if asked"
press guidance. 

Q:  WHAT IS THE U.S. REACTION TO THE ARREST TODAY (SEPTEMBER
12) OF BLOGGER RAJA PETRA KAMARDUDDIN UNDER MALAYSIA'S
INTERNAL SECURITY ACT (ISA)? 

A:  We understand from press accounts that Malaysian police
detained Raja Petra, who is associated with the "Malaysia
Today" website, under an article of the Internal Security Act
covering threats to "security, peace, and public order". 

We cannot comment further on the specific grounds for the
Malaysian government's actions. 

We are aware that Raja Petra also faces legal complaints and
charges of sedition related to information posted on the
website. 

The United States firmly believes that freedom of the press
and freedom of speech are fundamental components of a vibrant
democracy.  Freedom of expression is a basic right embodied
in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. 

The peaceful expression of political views is a cornerstone
of democratic rights and practice, as is the impartial
application of the rule of law. 

(IF ASKED SPECIFICALLY ON MALAYSIA'S USE OF THE INTERNAL
SECURITY ACT) 

A:  As a matter of principle, we hope that countries refrain
from using national security laws to curtail the peaceful
expression of political views and media freedom. 

KEITH

TOP-SECRET: Fall of Berlin Wall Caused Anxiety More than Joy at Highest Levels

Magister Bernd Pulch

Fall of Berlin Wall Caused Anxiety More than Joy at Highest Levels

Secret Documents Show Opposition to German Unification

Washington, D.C., July 29th, 2011 – The fall of the Berlin Wall 20 years ago generated major anxiety in capitals from Warsaw to Washington, to the point of outright opposition to the possibility of German unification, according to documents from Soviet, American and European secret files posted on the Web today by the National Security Archive.

Solidarity hero Lech Walesa told West German chancellor Helmut Kohl on the very day the Wall would fall that “events in the GDR [East Germany] are developing too quickly” and “at the wrong time,” that the Wall could fall in a week or two (it would be a matter of hours) and then Kohl and the West would shift all their attention and aid to the GDR, leaving poor Poland “in the background.” And indeed, Kohl cut short his visit to Warsaw and flew back to Germany as soon as the news arrived of the breach of the Wall.

British prime minister Margaret Thatcher earlier had told Soviet general secretary Mikhail Gorbachev that “Britain and Western Europe are not interested in the unification of Germany. The words written in the NATO communiqué may sound different, but disregard them.” Top Gorbachev aide Anatoly Chernyaev concluded that Thatcher wanted to prevent unification “with our hands” and not her own.

Former U.S. national security adviser Zbigniew Brzezinski informed Soviet Politburo member Aleksandr Yakovlev, “I openly said that I am in favor of Poland and Hungary remaining in the Warsaw Treaty Organization. Both blocs should not be disbanded right now. I do not know what will happen if the GDR ceases to exist. There will be one Germany, united and strong. This does not correspond to either your or our interests.”

One of the few highest-level expressions of joy over the fall of the Wall actually occurred in Moscow, in the diary of Gorbachev aide Chernyaev, who wrote on November 10, “The Berlin Wall has collapsed. This entire era in the history of the socialist system is over… That is what Gorbachev has done. And he has indeed turned out to be a great leader. He has sensed the pace of history and helped history to find a natural channel.”

The new documents, most of them appearing in English for the first time, are part of the forthcoming book, “Masterpieces of History”: The Peaceful End of the Cold War in Europe, 1989, edited by the National Security Archive’s Svetlana Savranskaya, Thomas Blanton, and Vladislav Zubok and published by the Central European University Press (Budapest/New York) in the Archive’s Cold War Reader series edited by Malcolm Byrne.


Read the Documents

Document 1: CIA Intelligence Assessment, “Gorbachev’s Domestic Gambles and Instability in the USSR,” September 1989

This controversial assessment from the CIA’s Office of Soviet Analysis separates SOVA from the consensus of the rest of the U.S. intelligence community regarding Gorbachev and his chances for success, or even survival. (Note 1) The document carries a scope note calling it a “speculative paper” because it goes against the general view that would soon be expressed in a Fall 1989 National Intelligence Estimate. That NIE would predict that Gorbachev would survive the coming economic crisis of 1990-91 without resorting to widespread repression (only targeted acts of suppression, as in Tbilisi)–a relatively optimistic conclusion that would play a major role in the Bush administration’s embrace of Gorbachev at Malta in December.

In the assessment below, authored by senior analyst Grey Hodnett, SOVA takes a much bleaker view, essentially concluding that Gorbachev’s reforms will fail, precipitating a coup, a crackdown, and perhaps even the piecemeal breakup of the empire. The United States “for the foreseeable future will confront a Soviet leadership that faces endemic popular unrest and that, on a regional basis at least, will have to employ emergency measures and increased use of force to retain domestic control.” The paper further predicts that “Moscow’s focus on internal order in the USSR is likely to accelerate the decay of Communist systems and growth of regional instability in Eastern Europe, pointing to the need for post-Yalta arrangements of some kind.” What exactly “post-Yalta” means is unclear, but may simply be a reference to the new non-communist government in Poland (installed in August), that explicitly chose to remain a part of the Warsaw Treaty Organization.  Under any circumstances, orchestrating such an arrangement would be a major challenge for the United States.

Document 2: National Security Directive (NSD) 23, “United States Relations with the Soviet Union,” September 22, 1989

This National Security Directive, representing the formal expression of U.S. foreign policy at the highest levels, was apparently drafted as early as April 1989, and its conclusions duly reflect how divorced U.S. policy in this period is from the radical transformations occurring in Eastern Europe. Among the document’s hesitant predictions: “[t]he character of the changes taking place in the Soviet Union leads to the possibility that a new era may be now upon us. We may be able to move beyond containment to a U.S. policy that actively promotes the integration of the Soviet Union into the existing international system.”  First, however, “Moscow must authoritatively renounce the ‘Brezhnev Doctrine’ and reaffirm the pledge of signatories to the U.N. Charter to refrain from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state.” It is almost as if the authors never read Gorbachev’s United Nations speech in December 1988, much less his Strasbourg address in July 1989. Perhaps the most sterile prescription in the document is the president’s directive to the secretary of state to eliminate “threatening Soviet positions of influence around the world.” Precisely what positions were these in the latter half of 1989? Again reflecting a sense of caution that willfully ignores the events on the ground in Eastern Europe, the authors declare hopefully: “[w]e may find that the nature of the threat itself has changed, though any such transformation could take decades.” These policy recommendations would perhaps be appropriate for 1986, but they are completely outdated in 1989.

Document 3: Record of Conversation between Mikhail Gorbachev and Margaret Thatcher, September 23, 1989

These notes of Margaret Thatcher’s conversation with Gorbachev contain the British leader’s most sensitive views on Germany–so confidential that she requests no written record be made of them during the meeting. Chernyaev complies but immediately afterwards rushes outside and writes down her comments from memory. The talks open with a candid exchange in which Gorbachev explains the recent (September 19-20) Party Plenum’s decisions on ethnic conflict, and why he does not believe in the Chinese model:  “how can you reform both the economy and politics without democratizing society, without glasnost, which incorporates individuals into an active socio-political life?” Thatcher replies, “I understand your position [on Eastern Europe] in the following way:  you are in favor of each country choosing its own road of development so long as the Warsaw Treaty is intact.  I understand this position perfectly.”

At this point, the prime minister asks that note-taking be discontinued.  Her words are indeed forceful, and imply a certain tradeoff–I understand your position on Eastern Europe, please accept mine on Germany:  “Britain and Western Europe are not interested in the unification of Germany. The words written in the NATO communiqué may sound different, but disregard them. We do not want the unification of Germany.” Of course, “[w]e are not interested in the destabilization of Eastern Europe or the dissolution of the Warsaw treaty either … I can tell you that this is also the position of the U.S. president.” No doubt the Russians took note that the U.S. reassurance only applied to Eastern Europe and not to German unification; but the vehemence of Thatcher’s opposition to the idea of unification provides a certain comfort to Gorbachev that he would rely on until it was too late for him actually to prevent the merger.

Document 4: Diary of Anatoly Chernyaev regarding German Reunification, October 9, 1989

This diary entry reflects the overestimation, by Gorbachev and his top aides, of the strength of West European opposition to German reunification. Chernyaev notes with approval the chorus of French official voices that have spoken quietly against “one Germany,” as well as the earlier Gorbachev conversations with Margaret Thatcher (see Document No. 3). But a note of realism emerges as Chernyaev concludes that the West Europeans want Moscow to do their dirty work: “they want to prevent this [reunification] with our hands.”

Document 5: Record of Conversation between Vadim Medvedev and Kurt Hager, October 13, 1989

Just a week after Gorbachev’s visit to Berlin, senior GDR party leader Kurt Hager and the Soviet Politburo member in charge of ideology, Vadim Medvedev, meet for several hours in Moscow. This memorandum provides an ample dose of the kind of party jargon that was the staple of such “fraternal” conversations in the Soviet bloc.  Rote invocations of eternal Soviet-East German friendship are followed by rhetorical commitments to continuing the building of socialism. But the real problems of the day continually force their way into the discussion.  Hager admits that an “inconsistency” between “everyday experiences” and “official reporting” has led to the spread of “a justifiable discontent” across society. Yet, the two party loyalists conclude, all this is really the result of “a massive campaign by the enemy” of “psychological warfare against the GDR, the SED, and socialism.” For them, the campaign has been a “complete failure,” notwithstanding the thousands of recent East German émigrés, the church dignitaries joining the political opposition, the street demonstrations, and all the other visible evidence of the GDR’s imminent collapse.

Document 6: Record of Conversation between Mikhail Gorbachev and Willy Brandt, October 17, 1989

In this conversation, Brandt and Gorbachev discuss changes under way in Eastern Europe and Germany and note the closeness of Soviet-West German contacts after Gorbachev’s visit to Bonn in June 1989. The Soviet leader calls for stability and gradual character of processes, informing Brandt that “I said to Mitterrand, Kohl, and Thatcher: it would be unacceptable for someone to behave like an elephant in a china shop right now.” In the one-on-one portion of the conversation Brandt and Gorbachev talk specifically about unification of Germany but set it in the framework of the “all-European process,” in other words, building of the common European home comes first and then within that home gradual unification could take place.

Document 7: Record of Telephone Conversation between George H.W. Bush and Helmut Kohl, October 23, 1989

Not only does Helmut Kohl initiate this telephone call, he also leads the entire conversation, giving the American president a detailed briefing, country-by-country, about the changes in Eastern Europe. Kohl says he is supporting the Hungarian reform communists “quite vigorously,” and that “our Western friends and partners should be doing more” to aid Poland. He foresees more than 150,000 refugees from the GDR by Christmas, and reaffirms his commitment to NATO. Bush’s response shows his concern from media stories “about German reunification resulting in a neutralist Germany and a threat to Western security”–“we do not believe that,” he insists–and he almost plaintively seeks credit for the $200 million that the U.S. will contribute to a Poland stabilization fund (hardly the new Marshall Plan that would be called for by, among others, Lech Wałęsa in his November 15 address to a joint session of the U.S. Congress). But Bush, characteristically, is determined not to move “so fast as to be reckless.”

Document 8: Record of Conversation between Aleksandr Yakovlev and Zbigniew Brzezinski, October 31, 1989

The leading Soviet reformer on the Politburo finds surprising agreement on the German question in this meeting with the Polish-American observer, Zbigniew Brzezinski, whom the Soviets had vilified as an enemy of détente when he served as President Carter’s national security adviser in the late 1970s. (Cementing his reputation for iconoclasm, Brzezinski would subsequently endorse Ronald Reagan for re-election in 1984.) In a tribute to glasnost, Brzezinski thanks Yakovlev for permitting a ceremonial visit to Katyń, the site of the World War II massacre of Polish officers by Stalin’s NKVD, which Soviet propaganda had long blamed on the Nazis.

This frank discussion of the future of Europe features Yakovlev’s repeated notion of the mutual dissolution of NATO and the Warsaw Pact versus Brzezinski’s argument that the blocs should remain stable, and even the new governments of Poland and Hungary should remain part of the Warsaw Treaty Organization. Like Gorbachev’s quotation of Giscard d’Estaing, Yakovlev foresees a Europe with “a common parliament, common affairs and trade relations,” along with open borders. He warns against any intervention by the U.S. or Western Europe in the processes underway in the East; and he declares that the lesson of Afghanistan is that “not one Soviet soldier should be in a foreign country with the purpose of conducting warfare.” Yakovlev wants the “same understanding” from the American side.

For his part, Brzezinski makes a number of prescient observations, contrasting the state of reform in the USSR (a “rift” between political and economic reform, with the former much further along) to that of China (economic but not political change), predicting that Czechoslovakia would soon follow the path of Poland and Hungary (this would happen only seven weeks later), and warning that any crumbling of the East German regime would soon lead to German unification–a development that “does not correspond to either your or our interests.” Here we see the Polish nationalist worried about “the Prussians” and preferring to keep Europe divided into two blocs rather than deal with “one Germany, united and strong.” The next day at a Politburo meeting, Gorbachev would compliment Brzezinski for possessing “global brains.”

Document 9: Record of Conversation between Mikhail Gorbachev and Egon Krenz, November 1, 1989

Here the Soviet leader receives the new East German replacement for Honecker, Egon Krenz. As interior minister, Krenz had declined to use force to suppress the Leipzig and other demonstrations, yet he would later serve time in unified German jails (unlike Honecker, who would be excused for health reasons) as punishment for the GDR’s policy of shooting Berlin Wall jumpers. Krenz tells Gorbachev, in effect, that his country’s policy has changed, citing “orders to our border troops not to use weapons at the border,” as part of an attempt to address the pressing refugee crisis.

Apparently meeting with Gorbachev’s approval, Krenz mentions in passing a new draft “law on foreign travel” that would loosen restrictions. This proposed law would figure directly in the most dramatic moment of the entire period. On November 9, a party spokesman’s unplanned announcement of the new law’s immediate effect (rather than the gradual change intended by the SED) at a Berlin press conference would lead to huge crowds pressing through checkpoints at the border with West Berlin culminating later that night in the actual tearing down of the Wall itself.  Perhaps at this point Gorbachev is already resigned to the refugee exodus and this presages Moscow’s relative calm when the Wall would fall.

With such developments as yet unimagined, the two leaders commiserate about the failures of Krenz’s predecessor. Gorbachev even claims that Honecker might have survived had he reformed earlier, but Krenz says Honecker was too threatened by Gorbachev’s own popularity. They frankly discuss their mutual economic problems, including Soviet resentment over providing the raw materials for the GDR’s factories, and Moscow’s sense of Eastern Europe as a burden. The Soviet general secretary also tells a remarkable story about the Politburo’s own ignorance of economic matters, describing an episode in the early 1980s when Gorbachev and Ryzhkov tried to obtain some budget information only to be warned away by then-leader Yuri Andropov.

On the German question, both the Soviet and the East German take comfort that “the majority of Western leaders do not want to see the dissolution” of the blocs nor the unification of Germany. But within a month the East German parliament would revoke the leading role of the communist party, and Krenz himself would resign on December 6.

Document 10: Notes of CC CPSU Politburo Session, November 3, 1989

In this excerpt of the Politburo notes, head of the KGB Vladimir Kryuchkov makes an accurate prediction about the rallies that would take place next day in Berlin, showing that the Soviet leadership had a pretty good understanding of the developments on the ground. They also realize that they need the help of the FRG to “keep the GDR afloat.” In an surprising proposal, Foreign Minister Eduard Shevardnadze suggests that the Soviets should take down the Wall themselves.  Gorbachev shares his view that “the West does not want unification of Germany, but it wants to prevent it with our hands.”

Document 11: Cable from U.S. Embassy in Sofia to the State Department, “The Nov 10 CC Party Plenum: Little Prospect for Major Changes,” November 9, 1989

On the day the Berlin Wall would fall, few could imagine that dramatic events were about to take place across the bloc. Typical of the cautious diplomatic discourse only hours before the ultimate Cold War symbol cracked is this cable from the U.S. Embassy in Bulgaria predicting calm and continuity, no “major personnel changes” and no “major change towards a more reform-minded system” as a result of the communist party plenum about to meet in Sofia. The Embassy’s information comes from limited sources–two Party officials and a published plenum discussion paper. In fact, at this moment, the 78-year-old Bulgarian party boss Todor Zhivkov is trying to fire his more moderate foreign minister, Petar Mladenov, who within a day would take Zhivkov’s job, promise a “modern, democratic, and law-governed state” and receive effusive public congratulations from Gorbachev.

Document 12: Notes of CC CPSU Politburo Session, November 9, 1989

On this historic day featuring the breaching of the Berlin Wall, the Soviet Politburo pays no attention at all to Eastern Europe.  The leadership’s regular weekly meeting mentions not a word about the changes in East Germany, but the reason becomes understandable when one realizes that the subject is the even more chilling prospect of the dissolution of the USSR itself.  There is a sense of fatalism in the air about the inevitability of the Baltic countries seceding, and even Gorbachev can propose only a media strategy to try to convince the Balts that separating from the USSR will “doom their people to a miserable existence.”  As he often does, Prime Minister Ryzhkov plays the role of the panicked Cassandra:  “What we should fear is not the Baltics, but Russia and Ukraine.  I smell an overall collapse.  And then there will be another government, another leadership of the country, already a different country.”  This time, his prediction would come true.

Document 13: Record of Conversation between Helmut Kohl and Lech Wałęsa, November 9, 1989

When the Berlin Wall is breached, West German Chancelor Helmut Kohl is out of the country–visiting the new democratic leaders of Poland. The Poles, represented by Solidarity hero and Nobel Prize winner Lech Wałęsa, are not at all eager for more change in East Germany. Wałęsa is virtually the only major political figure who foresees the Wall coming down soon–“he wonders whether the Wall will still be standing in one or two weeks”–and is anxious that “events in the GDR are developing too quickly.” He even suggests to Kohl that “one must try to slow them down” because “what would happen if the GDR completely opened its border and tore down the Wall–must the Federal Republic of Germany rebuild it [East Germany] again?” The problem for Poland, Wałęsa explains, is that West Germany “would be compelled to direct its gaze toward the GDR as a top priority” and no longer help Poland with its reforms. Kohl demurs and reassures Wałęsa that no matter what, Poland’s reforms would remain a priority. Besides, he adds, “[t]here is no military alternative [in the GDR]–either involving their own or Russian soldiers.” So events in the GDR, he declares, would remain under control. Within hours, however, the news of the Wall would arrive and Kohl would scramble back to Berlin–and ultimately fulfill Wałęsa’s prophecy.

Document 14: George H. W. Bush Remarks and a Question-and Answer Session with Reporters on the Relaxation of East German Border Controls, November 9, 1989

In this press conference, which took place just as first reports on the fall of Berlin Wall started coming in President George H. W. Bush expresses his cautious and uneasy reaction to the developments in Berlin. To the question why he does not seem “elated,” he responds, “I am not an emotional kind of guy.”

Document 15: Diary of Anatoly Chernyaev regarding the Collapse of the Berlin Wall, November 10, 1989

This extraordinary diary entry from inside the Kremlin on the day after the Wall’s collapse captures the “snapshot” reaction of one of the closest and most loyal of Gorbachev’s assistants. Chernyaev practically cheers “the end of Yalta” and the “Stalinist legacy” in Europe, and sees “the shift in the world balance of forces” towards ideas like the common European home and the Soviet Union’s integration with Europe. All of this he attributes to Gorbachev leading, not standing in the way.

Document 16: Record of Telephone Conversation between George H.W. Bush and Helmut Kohl, November 10, 1989

This memorandum of conversation reads as if the agenda had been set before the Berlin Wall fell. The West German chancellor leads off with a report on his trip to Poland, where the new leaders are “fine people” but with “too little professionalism” because they “spent the last couple of years in prison, not a place where one can learn how to govern.” Only after the president says he has no questions about Poland does Kohl launch into a description of the extraordinary scene in Berlin, “a dramatic thing; an historic hour,” “like witnessing an enormous fair” with “the atmosphere of a festival” where “they are literally taking down the wall” and “thousands of people are crossing both ways.”  Kohl hopes that the opening will not lead to more brain drain since 230,000 East Germans have already moved to the West this past year alone. Bush especially appreciates the political gesture Kohl mentions of publicly thanking “the Americans for their role in all of this;” and the president emphasizes his wish to be thoroughly briefed by Kohl before the upcoming Malta summit with Gorbachev. Bush repeats his recurring refrain about wanting “to see our people continue to avoid especially hot rhetoric that might by mistake cause a problem.” (In other words, no dancing on the Wall).

Document 17: Record of Telephone Conversation between Mikhail Gorbachev and Helmut Kohl, November 11, 1989

With the tearing down of the Wall, the West German chancellor takes the initiative in Europe, reaching out to both Moscow and Washington with assurances of stability in the two Germanys–the epicenter of the Cold War–while simultaneously pursuing his ultimately successful campaign for German unification. Here Kohl calls Gorbachev to express some of the same points made in the previous day’s telephone conversation with Bush: the need for more dynamic reforms in the GDR, the crossing back and forth of hundreds of thousands through the open Wall, and the potential impact of high numbers of East Germans migrating to the FRG. But Kohl’s core message is that he opposes destabilization in the GDR, and he indicates that he will check in with Gorbachev on all relevant topics immediately after his upcoming trip to Poland.

This appears to reassure the Soviet leader, who mentions their previous “philosophical” discussions about “relations between our two peoples” and how “mutual understanding is improving” as “we are getting closer to each other.” Gorbachev also applauds what he calls “a historic turn toward new relations, toward a new world;” but his worries show through when he urges Kohl to “use your authority, your political weight and influence to keep others within limits that are adequate for the time being … ” On a day when banners calling for German unification are billowing on both sides of the former Wall, Gorbachev resorts to euphemisms about this touchy subject, and hears what he wants to hear in Kohl’s commitment to stability.

Document 18: Record of Telephone Conversation between Mikhail Gorbachev and Francois Mitterrand, November 14, 1989

Alarmed by “all the excitement that has been raised in the FRG around the issue of German unification,” Gorbachev reaches out to the French president to confirm that “we have a mutual understanding” on this issue. Mitterrand’s tone is reassuring: “There is a certain equilibrium that exists in Europe, and we should not disturb it.”  But his words are more equivocal than Gorbachev would have wanted. The French position is to “avoid any kind of disruption,” but Mitterrand does not think “that the issue of changing borders can realistically be raised now–at least until a certain time.” When that time would be, however, he does not say.  Gorbachev believes he has assurances from Kohl that he will “abide strictly by the existing agreements” and that “the Germans should live where they are living now;” but such categorical commitments are not in evidence in the actual texts of Kohl’s conversations.


Notes

1. The background for this document comes from Lundberg, “CIA and the Fall of the Soviet Empire.”

CONFIDENTIAL:Viewing cable 04BRUSSELS1337, EU SUMMIT: FOREIGN POLICY TOPICS

C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 BRUSSELS 001337 

SIPDIS 

E.O. 12958: DECL: 03/26/2014
TAGS: PREL ZL CY IS IZ IV EUN RU USEU BRUSSELS
SUBJECT: EU SUMMIT: FOREIGN POLICY TOPICS 

Classified By: Rick Holtzapple, PolOff, Reasons 1.4. (B/D) 

SUMMARY
------ 

1. (SBU) The EU's March 25-26 Summit ran quickly through a
series of foreign policy issues during dinner on March 25,
followed up by a lunch discussion on Cyprus March 26 that
lasted less than one hour.  The final Conclusions (available
on at ue.eu.int/latest news) consisted of language largely
repeating earlier positions on Iraq, the Middle East, Cyprus,
Kosovo, and Afghanistan.  Two topics added to the agenda at
the last minute were Russia and Cote d'Ivoire, but even on
those the language essentially reiterated earlier positions.
On some topics, particularly Cyprus, however, the fact that
the Conclusions say nothing new does not mean they weren't
the subject of lengthy debate at the working level.  END
SUMMARY. 

IRAQ
---- 

2. (C) A British source told us the Conclusions on Iraq had
been drafted by the UK together with the Irish Presidency.
They were "carefully worded to be as helpful to the Coalition
as possible."  The Conclusions harshly condemn the recent
terror attacks, particularly the targeting of civilians as a
method of attempting "to disrupt the process of restoring
sovereignty and stability to Iraq."  The Conclusions make
repeated reference to the EU's desire for "a strong" or
"vital and growing" UN role in the political transition
process, but dances around the issue of any further UNSCR by
saying the EU looks forward to having the UN's role
"endorsed" by the UNSC.  Asked during a press conference if
he felt a new UNSCR was necessary, French President Chirac
noted France's "consistent" position that the only way to
bring stability to Iraq was by putting in place a
representative government with full powers, but on a UNSCR
would only say that "France's position continues to be that
it would be useful."  European Parliament President Pat Cox,
in a separate press conference, underlined the EU's interest
in a "core and central role" for the UN, but added, in what
appeared to be an indirect reference to Spain and others,
that if such a role could be secured in time, then the EU's
June 17-18 EU Summit "would have to deliver." 

MIDDLE EAST: GME, YASSIN'S DEATH
-------------------------------- 

3. (C) The language here is largely a repetition of past
GAERC or EU Summit Conclusions.  One sentence, highlighted in
press reports, makes a reference that we do not recall seeing
in earlier Conclusions, but which is consistent with standard
EU policy: "the EU will not recognize any change to the
pre-1967 borders other than those arrived at by agreement
between the parties."  The Conclusions also repeat the March
22 GAERC's objections to the "extra-judicial killing of Hamas
leader Sheikh Ahmed Yassin."  But, asked by the press about
the EU's views on the vetoed UNSCR condemning the Israeli
attack, Irish FM Brian Cowen commented that the draft
Resolution failed because it was "unbalanced" and failed to
condemn suicide bombings as well.  Asked in his press
conference about whether Yassin's death would torpedo the
U.S. Greater Middle East initiative, Chirac said that the
project had been "bouscule" (which can be loosely translated
as either "shoved" or "knocked over").  Still, in the Summit
Conclusions the EU leaders recalled "the readiness of the EU
to work with the US and other partners in cooperating with
the region."  Irish PM Ahern noted that he and FM Cowen would
be traveling to the Arab League Summit next week, and meeting
with Egyptian President Mubarak on March 29. 

CYPRUS
------ 

4. (C) Our British contact stressed that the Conclusions say
"absolutely nothing that has not been said before."  He noted
that drafters had argued all through the night of March
25-26, only concluding their negotiations at 6 a.m. this
morning.  While the final version says the Summit "welcomes
the Commission's continued willingness to offer assistance
for a speedy solution within the framework of the acquis,"
our contact said the Greek delegation had argued "endlessly"
for tougher language that would stress that any settlement
must conform to the acquis, or that no EU citizen could be
treated differently than another.  He said that after the
negotiations the Greeks were irritated by the British
insistence on sticking strictly to old texts, while the Turks
were annoyed the Conclusions included any reference at all to
the "acquis."  "The Turks should be pleased there is nothing
new in the text, and that it is not worse," he added.  We
also note that the Conclusions include a sentence saying the
Summit "welcomes the Commission's offer to organize a
high-level international conference in Brussels on 15 April
to prepare a donors conference." 

RUSSIA
------ 

5. (C) Reportedly, over the past of couple of weeks the EU
has gone back and forth about whether to include specific
reference to Russia in this Summit's Conclusions.  In the end
the Summit took the opportunity to not only congratulate
President Putin on his re-election, but, more substantively,
to reiterate to Russia that the EU expects its Partnership
and Cooperation Agreement with Russia "to be applicable to
all Member States without pre-condition or distinction as
from May 1, 2004."  A Russian colleague observing at the
Summit with us, acknowledged that Russia had been taken by
surprise by its inclusion in the Conclusions, and speculated
that it was Poland that most likely pushed for the language
on the PCA to be included. 

COTE D'IVOIRE
------------- 

6. (U) Presumably at French request, the Summit added a short
paragraph on March 26 to its Conclusions regretting the
recent violence and stressing that "full implementation of
the Marcoussis agreements is essential for returning peace in
the country." 

SCHNABEL

THE NAPLES GARBAGE CRISIS: A CASE STUDY IN SOUTHERN ITALIAN PARALYSIS, WITH SOME SIGNS OF HOPE

VZCZCXRO1344
RR RUEHFL RUEHNP
DE RUEHNP #0119/01 3241638
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 201638Z NOV 07
FM AMCONSUL NAPLES
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 6148
INFO RUEHRO/AMEMBASSY ROME 0369
RUEHMIL/AMCONSUL MILAN 0070
RUEHFL/AMCONSUL FLORENCE 0057
RHMFIUU/COMUSNAVEUR NAPLES IT
RHMFIUU/COMSERVFORSIXTHFLT
RUEHNP/AMCONSUL NAPLES 0875
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 NAPLES 000119

SIPDIS

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: SENV PGOV PREL CASC TBIO IT
SUBJECT: THE NAPLES GARBAGE CRISIS: A CASE STUDY IN SOUTHERN ITALIAN PARALYSIS, WITH SOME SIGNS OF HOPE

REF: NAPLES 57

Sensitive but unclassified - handle accordingly.

1. (SBU) Summary: Although the accumulation of garbage in Italy's Campania region has declined significantly since it grew to crisis proportions earlier this year, continued national and even international press coverage have made it a symbol of everything that is wrong with the Italian South: ineffective public services, failed leadership, lack of civic responsibility, and entrenched organized crime. While politicians continue to argue and blame each other, Naples Prefect Pansa, the government's Waste Commissioner, has identified new dump sites and landfills that, when opened, should bring relief. An incinerator in Acerra should begin operating in 2008, and will also contribute to a solution. A U.S. Navy assessment of health risks to its personnel in the region is being undertaken, and will examine how long-term contamination may have affected the air, water and soil quality (note: close hold). Post will continue to monitor the situation closely as our warden message on potential health hazards expires December 31. End summary.

2. (U) While the waste emergency in Campania is not as severe as it was several months ago (reftel), it has not yet been resolved. Trash goes uncollected for days and sometimes weeks in some parts of Naples and outlying suburbs and towns. As landfill space has become scarcer, some 300 to 500 metric tons of waste have accumulated in Naples Province alone, according to media reports. One report indicated that, were the garbage bales to be piled end to end, they would stretch from Naples to Scotland, while another predicted it would take fifty years to incinerate just the current accumulation. Regarding the separate issue of sewage treatment, one former Naples academic who now lives in the U.S. told the CG it is sheer luck that the city has not had a cholera epidemic in years.

3. (U) On November 13, Pol-Econoff and Econ specialist toured some of the affected areas. Particularly hard-hit by the crisis is suburban Pozzuoli, just west of Naples, where garbage piles stretch as long as 200 meters. At one site, Roma children picked through a five-foot high heap; at another, smoke billowed from a massive pile -- despite a huge sign announcing ""dumping prohibited."" Other areas choked with refuse include the Naples neighborhoods of Fuorigrotta and Bagnoli (near the NATO base), and several roads running on the ocean side of Mt. Vesuvius not far from the archaeological site of Herculaneum. Interestingly, there are no piles of uncollected trash in most tourist areas, in the Chiaia neighborhood where the American Consulate is located, or in Posillipo, the upscale neighborhood where Regional President Bassolino lives.

4. (SBU) Residents of some of the worst affected areas have staged several demonstrations over the past few weeks, some to protest that the garbage has not been collected, and some to object to the possible establishment of new dumps in their towns. As foreshadowed in reftel, a number of local mayors have opposed new dumps. Following increasing media attention, on November 7, Prime Minister Prodi called several local authorities to Rome to try to broker an agreement. The next day, Naples mayor Rosa Iervolino privately expressed her frustration to the CG, noting that both politics and geography were hindering a solution. Naples does not have much open space nearby, she said, ""and I can't dump the garbage into the sea!"" Later on November 8, a site near a cemetery in the city's Poggioreale district was selected as a new city dump. Yet although Iervolino acknowledged that the northern Italian city of Brescia successfully converted trash into energy, there is apparently no imminent plan to copy this model in Naples.

5. (SBU) In July, Prodi appointed Naples prefect Alessandro Pansa to be the new Commissioner for the Waste Emergency, replacing Guido Bertolaso, who continues in his role as national Director of Civil Protection. A member of Pansa's team (a nuclear waste specialist from Italy's Geological Survey) told us November 15 that he is optimistic the waste problem will be over soon, though this view is not widely shared by all observers. Two new major landfills in Caserta and Avellino (the former ""a done deal,"" the latter strongly expected) should mean an end to the space problem, he said. In addition, a modern incinerator, designed to convert non-toxic waste into energy, should be completed in Acerra in 2008. Many of the bales of waste that have been through processing plants and stored temporarily around the region will be deposited into some of Campania's caves, and in some instances covered with cement.

6. (U) Naples' recycling program (established two or three years ago) is not working well. Most politicians with whom we have discussed the issue bemoan the fact that Italians, in particular Southern Italians, do not share the discipline and civic responsibility of their northern European counterparts. However, even those who do attempt to recycle may be doing so in vain, according to the waste expert. Glass, cardboard and metal, which are in demand, get recycled, but the paper and plastic that many Neapolitans work to separate often get mixed back in with the rest of the garbage because recycling them is not economically viable. Mayor Iervelino asked the CG for possible U.S. interlocutors experienced in large-scale recycling. As part of the Mission's ""green"" initiative, the Consulate General recycles paper, plastic and toner.

7. (U) As for dealing with the ""not-in-my-backyard"" syndrome, our contact told us that Pansa's role as Commissioner gives him the authority (and funding) to issue and enforce decrees. On November 16, Naples media reported that Pansa had warned local authorities that if they do not accept their responsibility to deal with the waste problem, a solution would be forced on them. Indeed, politics seems to be a greater obstacle to resolving the problem than geographical or other factors, and reflects a broader leadership paralysis that extends well beyond the garbage crisis. Pansa's term as Commissioner expires on December 31; he will be replaced by Regional President Bassolino, who has already served as Waste Commissioner, and who is under indictment for fraud relating to cost and time over-runs on the incinerator project.

8. (U) The situation is further complicated by finger-pointing by various political leaders, and ongoing, unsubstantiated rumors that somehow organized crime is behind the waste crisis. Our contact in Pansa's office reported that he has not seen evidence of Camorra involvement, although he had noticed some ""suspicious"" people observing the unloading of waste at various dump sites. Organized crime's links to illegal toxic waste dumps in the region have been described in annual reports by leading Italian environmental group Legambiente, as well as in the recently published best-seller mafia expose ""Gomorra."" A major Camorra boss told judges a few years ago that toxic waste ""is like gold"" -- one of the most lucrative and less risky activities for the Camorra. Half of the industrial waste produced in Italy each year falls into the hands of organized crime groups who dispose of it illegally for record profits, according to Legambiente's most recent study.

9. (SBU) The U.S. Commander of Navy Region Europe has commissioned an assessment, being conducted by Navy experts with the collaboration of host-country officials, of the health risks of waste and pollution in the area. (NOTE: This assessment is sensitive and has not yet been made public, though both the GOI and local authorities are on board -- please hold close. End note.) Though prompted by this year's garbage crisis, its focus will be much larger, and the team will look at the effects of waste on the quality of soil, water and food throughout the region. According to members of the assessment team, initial indications are that the garbage burning, while unpleasant and possibly dangerous in certain areas, is not likely to be a serious general health risk. (An ongoing GOI study should shed more light on this.) A potentially more serious concern is the effect of decades of improper hazardous waste disposal in Campania. (The results of a GOI study were presented at an international conference in September, and should be published soon.) The key question regarding both trash burning and buried waste is if there is an overlap between specific local areas of concern and where Navy employees live or work, something the assessment team will be focusing on using geospatial data.

COMMENT
-------

10. (SBU) Despite high-profile media attention (newspapers continue to call it a ""crisis"" and an ""emergency""), the waste situation has improved significantly since the summer, and further progress appears to be in sight, despite the characteristically inefficient bureaucracy and the tendency of both politicians and the public to complain rather than to offer solutions. Most city districts are not overflowing with burning rubbish, as was the case several months ago. The Department's warden message, issued earlier this year in response to the more urgent situation, expires on December 31. Post will continue to monitor the situation, and will coordinate closely with local authorities (both health and political) and U.S. military personnel before making any final recommendation.

TRUHN

CONDIDENTIAL: East German Refugee Crisis in Embassies in Prague Turned Hardliners into Advocates for Change

Magister Bernd Pulch

Prague 1989:

Washington, D.C., July 28th, 2011 – Just before the fall of the Berlin Wall 20 years ago, even the hardline Czechoslovak Communist leaders called for the opening of the German border, according to documents from high-level archives in Berlin, Bonn and Prague published for the first time in English and posted on the Web today by the National Security Archive at George Washington University.

Czech police try to stop wall jumpers

Compiled and edited by Czech historian Vilem Precan and translated by Todd Hammond, the documents show that waves of East German refugees fleeing to the West through Czechoslovakia (more than 62,000 just in the period from November 4 to 10, 1989) so alarmed the Czechoslovak Communist authorities – who previously had resisted the reforms under way in Poland, Hungary and in Moscow – that they asked the East German leadership on November 8 to allow its citizens to go directly to West Germany, in effect to open the border.

The documents posted today include the secret diplomatic exchanges between the West German foreign ministry and its embassy in Prague where thousands of refugees took shelter, between East German diplomats in Prague and their bosses in East Berlin, between Czechoslovak diplomats and Party officials and their counterparts, and eyewitness accounts by dissident Charter 77 spokespeople about the refugee crisis.

The posting also includes contemporaneous photographs of the scene at the West German embassy in Prague, Czech police attempting to prevent refugees from scaling the embassy walls, the tent city that arose in its courtyard, and rows of abandoned Trabant cars in the streets of Prague.

The detailed essay by Vilem Precan, “Through Prague to Freedom,” that accompanies the documents cites the Czechoslovak government’s demarche to East Berlin on November 8 as “a kind of ultimatum” that forced the East German Communists into a rapid “modification of rules for permanent exit” – a reform famously announced and flubbed by an East German Politburo member at a press conference on November 9.  The statements by Gunter Schabowski led Western TV reporters to declare the Berlin Wall open when it was not, but the televised news brought crowds of East Germans to the checkpoints in East Berlin that evening who eventually forced their way through and made the media reports ultimately accurate.

Partners of long standing with the National Security Archive, the Czechoslovak Documentation Centre also acknowledges the generous support of the Fritz Thyssen Foundation specifically for the intensive archival and translation efforts involving in researching and compiling the previously secret history of the refugee crisis of 1989.


Through Prague to Freedom
The Exodus of GDR Citizens through Czechoslovakia to the Federal Republic of Germany, September 30 – November 10, 1989
An introductory essay by Vilém Prečan (PDF version)

East Germans line up in Prague

Document 1
August 22, 1989, Bonn – Foreign Ministry of the Federal Republic of Germany to the embassy in Prague. Orders dealing with the temporary closing of the Prague embassy to the public.

PA AA Berlin, Record group B85, Vol. 2346E. Drahterlass No. 402.
Translation (extract) by Todd Hammond.

Document 2
September 12, 1989, Prague – Statement from Czechoslovak Press Agency on the alleged anti-Czechoslovak campaign by the media and some political circles in the Federal Republic concerning the “illegal emigration” of GDR citizens.

CTK (Czech Press Agency), Prague. Archival database, 9/12/1989.
Translation by Todd Hammond.

Document 3
September 14, 1989, Prague – Charter 77 spokepersons to the CSSR government. Letter on the situation of East German refugees at the Embassy of the Federal Republic of Germany in Prague.

Informace o Chartě 77, Vol. 12 (1989), No. 17, p. 2.
Translation (extract) by Todd Hammond.

Document 4
September 20, 1989, Prague – GDR Ambassador Helmut Ziebart to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs in Berlin. Reports on measures taken by the Czechoslovak authorities against attempts by citizens of the GDR to cross into Hungary, and the situation at the Federal Republic embassy in Prague.

BStU Berlin. MfS, ZAIG, 22477, Fol. 17 f.
Translation (extract) by Todd Hammond.

Document 5
September 21, 1989, Berlin – Memorandum of conversation between GDR Foreign Minister Oskar Fischer and director of the fourth territorial department of the Czechoslovak Foreign Ministry Kadnár. With the authorization of the General Secretary of the CPCz Central Committee and the CSSR Government, Kadnár relays the Czechoslovak position on the question of the GDR citizens at the Embassy of Federal Republic in Prague. “The Czechoslovak side asks that the GDR consider the possibility of solving the problem in Prague with a one-time measure explicitly described as a great exception.”

SAPMO-BArch. Berlin. DY 30, 11621.
Translation by Todd Hammond.

In the courtyard of the West German embassy

Document 6
September 29, 1989, Prague – Federal Ministry of Foreign Affairs to CSSR Permanent UN Mission in New York. Report of the territorial department IV for Minister Johanes on the newest Czechoslovak proposals and other steps to resolve the situation at the embassy of the Federal Republic in Prague. “The GDR must take a more active part in the interest of easing the entire set of problems…”

Ministry of Foreign Affairs Archive, Prague. Telegrams sent, 1989, vol. 9, ref. no. 3335
Translation by Todd Hammond.

Document 7
September 29, 1989, Prague – Federal Ministry of Foreign Affairs to the CSSR Permanent UN Mission in New York. Report by the Territorial Department IV for Minister Johanes on the meeting between Soviet ambassador Lomakin and Secretary of the CPCz Central Committee Jozef Lenárt over the issue of the GDR citizens at the Federal Republic embassy in Prague.

Ministry of Foreign Affairs Archive, Prague. Telegrams sent, 1989, vol. 9, ref. no. 3338.
Translation by Todd Hammond.

Document 8
September 29, 1989, 16:35, Prague – GDR Ambassador Helmut Ziebart to the SED Central Committee and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs in Berlin, relaying his observations from conversations with officials of the CPCz and the CSSR Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

BStU Berlin, MfS, HA II, 32922, Fol. 5 – 7.
Translation by Todd Hammond.

Document 9
September 30, 1989, Prague – Federal Ministry of Foreign Affairs to the CSSR Permanent UN Mission in New York. Report of the Territorial Department IV for Minister Johanes on proposals by the GDR leadership for transport of GDR citizens from the Prague embassy of the Federal Republic, and agreement by CSSR officials with this solution.

Ministry of Foreign Affairs Archive, Prague. Telegrams sent, 1989, vol. 9, ref. no. 3340.
Translation by Todd Hammond.

Document 10
October 2, 1989, Prague – Embassy of the Federal Republic in Prague to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs in Bonn. Summary report on the one-time transfer of citizens of the GDR to the Federal Republic on the night of September 30 – October 1 after intervention by Foreign Minister Genscher, and another wave of refugees on the embassy grounds.

PA AA Berlin. Record group AV, Vol. 20.682E. Drahtbericht  No.2294.
Translation by Todd Hammond.

Outside the West German embassy

Document 11
October 3, 1989, 17:40, Prague – GDR Ambassador Helmut Ziebart to the GDR Foreign Ministry and the SED Central Committee, conveying a plea by the CPCz leadership and the CSSR Government to have some understanding for Czechoslovakia’s difficult situation resulting from the mass influx of GDR citizens; expressing the CSSR Government’s thanks for finding a solution; and informing the GDR Foreign Ministry of the Czechoslovak intention to stand behind the GDR position.

BStU Berlin, MfS, HA II, 38061, Fol. 110 f.
Translation by Todd Hammond.

Document 12
October 3, 1989, Prague – CSSR Government statement about the gathering of citizens of the GDR at the Embassy of the Federal Republic, and their departure to the Federal Republic, with criticism of the allegedly irresponsible measures taken by the Federal Republic.

CTK (Czech Press Agency), Prague. Archival database, 10/3/1989.
Translation by Todd Hammond.

Document 13
October 3, 1989, Berlin – CSSR Ambassador to the GDR František Langer to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs in Prague. Reports on the decision of the SED leadership to temporarily suspend private travel by GDR citizens to Czechoslovakia, and resolve the situation at the Federal Republic embassy in Prague as was done on September 30.

Foreign Ministry Archive, Prague. Telegrams received, 1989, vol. 35.
Translation by Todd Hammond.

Document 14
October 4, 1989, Berlin – First Deputy Foreign Minister Herbert Krolikowski to General Secretary of the SED Central Committee and Chairman of the GDR State Council Erich Honecker. Relays information from Ambassador Helmut Ziebart with urgent inquiries and messages from CSSR officials. “Comrade Jakeš asks that Comrade Honecker himself be told that the situation in Prague is highly critical.”

BStU Berlin. MfS, Sekr. des Ministers, 63, Fol. 23 f.
Translation (extract) by Todd Hammond.

Document 15
October 4, 1989, Berlin – Resolution by the SED Politburo on measures to be taken in regard to the emigration of GDR citizens gathering at the embassy of the Federal Republic in Prague, further limitations on the visa- and passport-free travel regime with the CSSR, and increased patrolling of the GRD’s border with Poland.

SAPMO-BArch. Berlin. DY 30, 5195, Fol. 14 f.  Also SAPMO-BArch. Berlin. DY 30, J IV/2/2, 2530, Fols. 1–3.
Translation by Todd Hammond.

Abandoned East German Trabants
line the streets of Prague

Document 16
October 5, 1989, Prague – Czechoslovak State Security Headquarters, Second Department. Information on the exodus of GDR citizens from the Prague embassy of the Federal Republic through GDR territory, and the situation in and around the embassy on October 1–4, 1989

Security Services Archive, Prague. Object file reg. no. 845 (“Obora”), Fols. 209–212.
Translation by Todd Hammond.

Document 17
October 5, 1989, Berlin – Summary of information by the GDR Ministry of State Security about the transport to the Federal Republic of East German citizens taking refuge at West German embassy, and related events, occurring on the territory of the GDR, especially in Dresden.

BStU Berlin, MfS, Arbeitsbereich Neiber, 613, Fols. 22-27.
Translation (extract) by Todd Hammond.

Document 18
October 5–6, 1989, Prague – Report from Charter 77 signatory Jan Urban on the second exodus of GDR citizens from Prague to the Federal Republic, published in the independent samizdat bulletin Information on Charter 77.

Informace o Chartě 77, Vol. 12 (1989), No. 18, 9—11 pp.
Translation (extract) by Todd Hammond.

Document 19
October 19, 1989, Prague – Federal Ministry of Foreign Affairs to the CSSR embassies. Summary from the department of information and documentation on the situation in the GDR and personnel changes in the SED leadership.

Ministry of Foreign Affairs Archive, Prague. Telegrams sent, 1989, vol. 9, ref. no. 3550.
Translation by Todd Hammond.

Document 20
October 23, 1989, Berlin – CSSR Ambassador to the GDR František Langer to the Foreign Ministry in Prague. Reports on politics of the new SED leadership, and the political situation in the country. “The Party and state leadership is now being pressured into a number of reforms in a wide range of areas, beginning with travel and ending for example with revising the results of local elections.”

Ministry of Foreign Affairs Archive, Prague. Telegrams received, 1989, vol. 38.
Translation by Todd Hammond.

Document 21
October 24, 1989, Berlin – Resolution of the Politburo of the SED CC, concerning the rescinding of the temporary suspension of travel to the CSSR without a passport or visa, effective November 1, 1989.

SAPMO-BAr Berlin, DY 30, 5195, Fols. 275-277.
Translation by Todd Hammond.

Document 22
October 25, 1989, Berlin – CSSR Ambassador to the GDR František Langer to the foreign ministry in Prague. He reports on the intention of the GDR to reopen the border for private travel to Czechoslovakia. “The GDR intends to issue the decision on the allowing of tourist traffic to the same extent as it was in the past.”

Ministry of Foreign Affairs Archive, Prague. Telegrams received, 1989, vol. 38.
Translation by Todd Hammond.

Document 23
November 3, 1989, Berlin – GDR Minister of Foreign Affairs Oskar Fischer to General Secretary of the SED Central Committee Egon Krenz. Relays a telephone message from Prague with proposals by General Secretary Jakeš about the situation at the FRG embassy in Prague, and proposes to resolve the situation by allowing direct travel by citizens of the GDR from Czechoslovakia to the Federal Republic without formal release from GDR citizenship. (Below the address on the letterhead is the handwritten note, “Einverstanden [I agree], Egon Krenz”.)

SAPMO-BArch, Berlin. DY 30, 5196, Fols. 17–19; also DY 30 IV/2/2.039 (Bureau Egon Krenz), Vol. 342, Fols. 155–157.
Translation by Todd Hammond.

Document 24
November 3, 1989, Berlin – CSSR Ambassador František Langer to the Foreign Ministry in Prague. Reports on the fecklessness of SED officials in the face of the situation created after the reopening of the border for free travel from the GDR to Czechoslovakia. Langer tells East Berlin officials that “no one in the CSSR understands why citizens of the GDR must travel to the FRG through the CSSR”.

Ministry of Foreign Affairs Archive, Prague. Telegrams received, 1989, vol. 39.
Translation by Todd Hammond.

Document 25
November 4, 1989, Prague – Embassy of the Federal Republic to the Foreign Ministry in Bonn. Direct travel by 4600 GDR citizens from Czechoslovakia to the Federal Republic of Germany, organized by the embassy. “The third mass departure through the Prague embassy organized over the past few weeks is now largely at an end.”

PA AA Berlin. Record group B85, Vol. 2347E. Drahtbericht No. 2578.
Translation by Todd Hammond

Document 26
November 5, 1989, Prague – GDR Ambassador Helmut Ziebart to the foreign ministry in Berlin. Reports on the numbers of GDR citizens who departed from Prague to the Federal Republic on November 3–5 with only GDR personal identification card, and problems that the new arrangement is causing on the Czechoslovak side. “The Czechoslovak comrades are asking more and more often when citizens of the GDR will be permitted to use the border crossings between the GDR and FRG under the same conditions they can do right now through the territory of the CSSR.”

BStU, Berlin. MfS, HA II, 32922, Fol. 22.
Translation by Todd Hammond.

Document 27
November 8, 1989, Prague – GDR Ambassador Helmut Ziebart to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs in Berlin. Ziebart was asked “to relay the request that departures by citizens of the GDR to the FRG be handled directly, and not through the territory of the CSSR.”

BStU Berlin. MfS, Arbeitsbereich Neiber, 553, Fol. 2
Translation by Todd Hammond..

Document 28
November 9, 1989, Prague – Information summary from the CPCz Central Committee to the various branches of the CPCz apparatus about the emigration of GDR citizens to the Federal Republic through the territory of the CSSR on November 1– 8, 1989.

National Archive, Prague. Record Group ÚV KSČ (CPCz CC), Documentation 1989 (unsorted). Teletext messages and letters of the CPCz Central Committee.
Translation (extract) by Todd Hammond.

Document 29
November 10, 1989, Berlin (West) – Chief of the CSSR Military Mission in West Berlin Sochor to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs in Prague on the situation after the opening of the Berlin Wall in the night of November 9–10, 1989.

Ministry of Foreign Affairs Archive, Prague. Telegrams received, 1989, vol. 40.
Translation by Todd Hammond.

Document 30
November 10, 1989, Prague – Statement by the Federal Ministry of the Interior press officer, on the number of East German citizens who emigrated through Czechoslovakia to the Federal Republic during November 4–10, 1989.

CTK (Czech Press Agency), Prague.  Archival database, 11/10/1989.
Translation by Todd Hammond.


Notes

Deutsche Reichsbahn: the name adopted by the GDR for its railway system from 1949 to 1994; PA AA Berlin (Politisches Archiv des Auswärtigen Amtes): Archive of the Federal Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Berlin; BStU (Bundesbeauftragter für die Unterlagen des Staatssicherheitsdienstes der ehemaligen DDR): Federal Commissioner for the Stasi Archives; Drahtbericht: an encrypted telegram from the Embassy of the Federal Republic; Drahterlass: an encrypted telegram from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Bonn; MfS: Ministry of State Security, Berlin (East)

MERKWÜRDEN-MAIL VON “GoMoPA” und/oder mutmasslich “Peter Ehlers” zwecks Desinformation und Spionage

Magister Bernd Pulch

Subject:  

Stalking gegen Sie
From:   hessenkassel@Safe-mail.net
Date:   Thu, July 28, 2011 10:18 am
To:   office@generalglobalmedia.com
Priority:   Normal
Options:   View Full Header | View Printable Version  | Download this as a file
Guten Tag Herr Pulch,

unser Kontakt kam damals leider nicht zustande. Nochmals der Versuch jetzt!
Ich kann Ihnen nachweisen, wer hinter zum Teil welchen Mails und Webseiten gegen Sie
und Herrn Schramm steckt.
Man kennt seine Schweine am Gang. Ebenso habe ich erhebliches Hintergrundwissen über
verschiedene Personen und Institutionen. 

Übrigens sind Sie auf dem Holzweg was Siegfried Sievers angeht. Den gibt es
wirklich, ich kenne den Klarnamen der verkrachten Existenz, die früher bei der BZ
gearbeitet hat. 

Also melden Sie sich doch mal bitte oder lassen Sie es bleiben

Gruß

TOP-SECRET: The Soviet Origins of Helmut Kohl’s 10 Points

Magister Bernd Pulch

Documents show secret messages from Moscow sparked West German chancellor to announce German unification plans on November 28, 1989

Unintended consequences – the backchannel backfires: shock in Moscow and dismay in Washington

Washington, D.C., July 28th 2011 – Secret messages from senior Soviet officials to West German Chancellor Helmut Kohl after the fall of the Berlin Wall led directly to Kohl’s famous “10 Points” speech on German unification, but the speech produced shock in both Moscow and Washington, according to documents from Soviet, German and American files posted today on the Web by the National Security Archive.

Published for the first time in English in the Archive’s forthcoming book, “Masterpieces of History,” the documents include highest-level conversations between President George H.W. Bush and Kohl; the text of the letter Kohl had delivered to Bush just as he announced the “10 Points” to the Bundestag on November 28, 1989; excerpts on Germany from the transcript of the Malta summit between Bush and Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev; Gorbachev’s own incendiary meeting with the German foreign minister after Kohl’s speech; and more.

The documents show the American administration’s devotion to stability and “reserve” while the West German leader rushes to get out in front of the rapid changes in the East, at the same time that neither Bush nor Kohl expects unification to happen so quickly.  Most strikingly, the documents and related accounts by Kohl’s aide, Horst Teltschik, and Gorbachev’s aide, Andrei Grachev, show that Kohl’s famous “10 Points” speech was based in large part directly on secret messages from Moscow – but unbeknownst to Gorbachev.

The new history of the “10 Points” speech hinges on a back-channel communication from Soviet Central Committee expert Valentin Falin (head of the International Department and former Soviet ambassador to West Germany in the 1970s), through long-time Soviet interlocutor Nikolai Portugalov, to Teltschik, on November 21, 1989, about the idea of “confederation” between West Germany and the rapidly collapsing East German regime – a way to prop up the East by getting some equal status for the two states before the bottom fell out.  According to Grachev, Falin’s rivalry with top Gorbachev assistant Anatoly Chernyaev had prevented Falin from getting his ideas to Gorbachev directly, so he decided to use a long-standing “confidential channel” through Portugalov to Teltschik, anticipating that Teltschik would then persuade Kohl to call Gorbachev and discuss the idea of confederation while reassuring the Soviets that it would only take place in the context of the “common European home.”

Falin drafted two position papers, an “official” one, cleared with Chernyaev, that mostly reaffirmed the pledges made by Kohl to Gorbachev and stated that if they were kept, then “everything becomes possible;” and an “unofficial” one, which declared that the idea of confederation was something the Soviets were already discussing at the level of the Politburo and were prepared to accept in principle.  But when Portugalov delivered these messages on November 21, Teltschik and then Kohl did not realize they were supposed to call Gorbachev and bring him along, but thought the messages were coming from Gorbachev and that he was already on board.  Furthermore, if Moscow was thinking this way, Kohl needed to go public quickly just to keep up and regain the initiative.  Teltschik therefore drafted the “10 Points” on the basis of the Soviet positions, leading with a commitment to the pan-European process (Gorbachev’s core vision) and making the idea of confederation (however gradual) the center of the German unification discourse.

The now-available documents show that Kohl did not inform either Bush, his allies, or his own foreign minister before delivering his speech in the Bundestag on November 28.  In fact, Kohl arranged for Bush to receive his letter combining advice for the forthcoming Malta summit and a summary of the “10 Points” just as Kohl was actually speaking in Bonn.  The result was consternation in Washington.  Bush aide Brent Scowcroft commented, “If he was prepared to go off on his own whenever he worried that we might object, we had very little influence.”  At the Malta summit on December 2 and 3, Gorbachev complained to Bush that “Kohl does not act seriously and responsibly,” while the American reassured Gorbachev that “[w]e are trying to act with a certain reserve” and couched his position on Germany in double negatives.

Bush’s reserve seemed to change after he actually met with Kohl on December 3 in Brussels, when the West German leader outlined a gradual process towards federation and predicted a timeline of more than two years.  (Unification would actually happen within just 10 months).  But Gorbachev’s ire rose to a crescendo in his meeting with German Foreign Minister Hans-Dietrich Genscher on December 5 – just as the East German Communist Party was resigning en masse and the government collapsing, and just after the NATO allies including Bush had publicly announced support for Kohl.   Gorbachev told Genscher that the West Germans were preparing a “funeral for the European process” while Shevardnadze even invoked a comparison with Hitler!

After Genscher reported the conversation back to Bonn, Teltschik hastened to do damage control, writing a memo to Kohl on December 6, attaching the Portugalov positions, specifically telling Kohl that the “10 Points” were based directly on the Soviet messages, and emphasizing that Kohl needed to talk to Gorbachev.  But the Soviet leader would decline such overtures until February 1990.

Teltschik first mentioned the story of the Soviet messages in his memoirs published in 1991, and the new book by Mary Sarotte (1989: The Struggle to Create Post-Cold War Europe) includes a colorful recreation of the Portugalov mission, but without the Soviet backstory.  The Soviet context as well as Falin’s role in originating the Soviet messages are detailed for the first time in Andrei Grachev’s book, Gorbachev’s Gamble (2008) and were personally confirmed to the authors of this posting by Teltschik and Grachev.


Read the Documents

Document No. 1: Record of Telephone Conversation between George H.W. Bush and Helmut Kohl, November 17, 1989

Only nine days after the fall of the Berlin Wall, the West German leader initiates this telephone conversation with President Bush.  Here, Kohl reports on his talks with Gorbachev and with East German leader Egon Krenz, and promises “we will do nothing that will destabilize the situation in the GDR.”  Bush responds: “The euphoric excitement in the U.S. runs the risk of forcing unforeseen action in the USSR or the GDR that would be very bad.”  But he assures Kohl that “[w]e will not exacerbate the problem by having the President of the United States posturing on the Berlin Wall.”  Kohl’s initiative also shows in his offer to match a U.S. contribution of up to $250 million for a proposed Polish stabilization fund; (earlier in 1989, Bush had offered only $125 million for Poland over three years).  Bush tells Kohl “I am absolutely determined to get advice and suggestions from you personally before I meet with Gorbachev [at Malta]… so that I can understand every nuance of the German Question… [and] nuances of difference in the Alliance.” But Kohl remarks that “[w]ith the developing situation, I would like to stay here.”  Kohl would give his advice on Gorbachev in the same November 28 letter to Bush that tells the American president about the “10 Points.”  Ultimately Bush and Kohl would meet face to face only after Malta.

Document No. 2: Letter from Helmut Kohl to George H.W. Bush, November 28, 1989

This remarkable letter arrives at the White House at the very moment that Chancellor Kohl is surprising both the allies and the Soviets with his “10 Points” speech at the Bundestag in Bonn, pointing towards reunification.  The letter is couched as a response to Bush’s repeated entreaties to Kohl (for example in phone calls on November 10 and 17) for his input before the Malta meeting with Gorbachev; in fact, Bush had practically implored Kohl to meet in person, but the chancellor demurred in order to tend to his domestic political situation.

The letter has a much more formal tone than the telephone transcripts convey, likely due to the participation of Kohl’s aides in drafting and editing it.  Here, the German leader encourages Bush to engage with Gorbachev across the board, but uses the president’s own mantra of “stability” to emphasize that “the most important decisions over stability or destabilization will be made by the countries in Central and Eastern Europe.  The duty of the West on the other hand must be to support the ongoing reform process from the outside.”  Kohl emphasizes that “Western help is coming far too slowly” to Poland and Hungary in particular–a rebuke to Bush’s caution.  Kohl also pays quite a compliment to Gorbachev, telling Bush that for the reform changes in Eastern Europe, “we have General Secretary Gorbachev’s policies to thank.  His perestroika loosed, made easier, or accelerated these reforms.  He pushed governments unwilling to make reforms towards openness and towards acceptance of the people’s wishes; and he accepted developments that in some instances far surpassed the Soviet Union’s own standards.”

But all the Malta advice is really secondary to the letter’s final section laying out the “10 Points,” along with a personal appeal in which he attempts to cover his bases with Bush.  Kohl had informed neither the Americans nor the NATO allies (nor his own foreign minister) in advance of his speech.  In his joint memoir with Scowcroft, Bush writes that Kohl was “[a]fraid of leaks, or perhaps of being talked out of it” and that “I was surprised, but not too worried,” because Kohl “couldn’t pursue reunification on his own.”  Scowcroft was more concerned:  “If he was prepared to go off on his own whenever he worried that we might object, we had very little influence.”  Scowcroft commented that in his telephone conversation the next day, November 29, Kohl over and over “pledged that there would be no going it alone–only one day after he had, in fact, ‘gone it alone.'” (Note 1)  These phrases, such as “little influence” and “support … from the outside” provide further testimony of how American policy lagged, instead of led, the miracles of 1989.

Document No. 3: Excerpts from the Soviet Transcript of the Malta Summit, December 2-3, 1989

While the U.S. transcript of Malta is not yet declassified, the Gorbachev Foundation has published excerpts of the Russian version, and the most complete version may be found in “Masterpieces of History.”  Posted here are the parts of the summit conversation in which the two leaders focused on the German question.  Interestingly, neither leader expects events to move as fast as they would the following year.  Just days earlier, on November 28, Helmut Kohl announced his “10 Points” towards confederation in a Bundestag speech that the Soviet Foreign Ministry denounced as pushing change in “a nationalist direction;” and here, Gorbachev attributes the speech to Kohl’s domestic politics and says Kohl “does not act seriously and responsibly.”  But then Gorbachev asks whether a united Germany would be neutral or a member of NATO, suggesting that at least theoretically he imagines the latter, although he may simply be acknowledging the U.S. position.  His clear preference is for the continuation of two states in Germany and only very slow progress towards any unification:  “let history decide.”  The president is not eager for rapid progress either; he says “I hope that you understand that you cannot expect us not to approve of German reunification.  At the same time … [w]e are trying to act with a certain reserve.”

Document No. 4: Memorandum of Conversation of George H.W. Bush, John Sununu, Brent Scowcroft, and Helmut Kohl, December 3, 1989

This conversation immediately after the Malta summit marks a turning point in the process of German unification, where President Bush effectively joins Chancellor Kohl’s program–yet neither man expects unification to happen even in two years, much less by October 1990 when West and East would actually join .  Bush gives Kohl a rundown on the conversation at Malta, describing Gorbachev as “tense” during talks about Germany and convinced that Kohl is moving too quickly:  “I don’t want to say he went ‘ballistic’ about it–he was just uneasy.”  Both men agree to reassure Gorbachev and “not do anything reckless.”

The key moment here comes when Kohl tells Bush the opposite, in effect, of what Bush told Gorbachev about the inviolability of borders under the Helsinki Final Act.  Kohl reminds the American that Helsinki actually allows borders to be “changed by peaceful means;” and this seems to be the first time Bush internalizes this possibility.  At the same time, Kohl outlines three deliberate steps: first, a free government in the former GDR, second, “confederative structures, but with two independent states,” and finally a “federation; that is a matter for the future and could be stretched out.  But I cannot say that will never happen.”  Kohl scoffs at predictions that this will take only two years: “It is not possible; the economic imbalance is too great.”  Here his language is similar to Gorbachev’s–“the integration of Europe is a precondition for change in Eastern Europe to be effective”–but he says that European resistance to unification really comes from envy over Germany’s economic growth (“[f]rankly, 62 million prosperous Germans are difficult to tolerate–add 17 million more and they have big problems”).

Bush asks about GDR opinions on unification, and neither he nor Kohl foresees the rush to reunify that would dominate the March 1990 elections there.  As for European views, Kohl gives a candid summary, calling Mitterrand “wise” for disliking unification but not opposing it, while “Great Britain is rather reticent.”  Bush exclaims, “That is the understatement of the year”–referring to Thatcher’s total opposition.  Kohl says, “She thinks history is not just.  Germany is so rich and Great Britain is struggling.  They won a war but lost an empire and their economy.”  The German version of this conversation contains more detail than the American version below, including an interesting discussion of Gorbachev and values (12 lines in the German, but only a parenthetical comment below) where Bush says “the entire discussion about economic issues had an unreal aspect to it more because of ignorance on the Russian side rather than narrow-mindedness.  For example, Gorbachev took offense to the expression ‘Western values.'”

Document No. 5: Record of Conversation between Mikhail Gorbachev and Hans Dietrich Genscher, December 5, 1989

A week has passed since Helmut Kohl announced his “10 Points” in a Bundestag speech, and Gorbachev, unlike his demeanor regarding Germany at Malta (see reference in Document No. 4), does go “ballistic” in this conversation.  This is perhaps because he is receiving the German foreign minister, Hans Dietrich Genscher, who heads a separate political party from Kohl but participates in the coalition government, but more likely it is because Bush has apparently weighed in on Kohl’s side, despite the cautious talk at Malta, and the government in East Germany has collapsed.  Gorbachev angrily remarks: “Yesterday, Chancellor Kohl, without much thought, stated that President Bush supported the idea of a confederation. What is next? …What will happen to existing agreements between us? … I cannot call him [Kohl] a responsible and predictable politician.”  Gorbachev says he thought Kohl would at least consult with Moscow, but “[h]e probably already thinks that his music is playing–a march–and that he is already marching with it.”

From the Soviet view, the “10 Points” are “ultimatums” and “crude interference in the internal affairs of a sovereign state.”  Gorbachev is personally offended because “[j]udging from all this, you have prepared a funeral for the European processes”–i.e., his own vision of the common European home.  Genscher tries to defend the “10 Points” as requiring “no conditions” and representing “just suggestions,” and that “the GDR should decide whether they are suitable or not.”  Gorbachev rebukes Genscher for becoming Kohl’s “defense attorney” and raises the rhetorical attack to the point of making a reference to the Nazi era: “You have to remember what mindless politics has led to in the past.”  Genscher responds, “We are aware of our historical mistakes, and we are not going to repeat them.  The processes that are going on now in the GDR and in the FRG do not deserve such harsh judgment.”  (Shevardnadze is even more blunt with his comparisons, mentioning Hitler by name.)  As a final debating point, Gorbachev notes that Genscher himself only heard about the “10 Points” for the first time in the Bundestag speech.  The German confirms it–“Yes, that is true”–but then deftly slips in a rejoinder to the new champion of non-interference that “this is our internal affair.”  Gorbachev replies, “You can see that your internal affair is making everybody concerned.”

Document No. 6: Horst Teltschik’s Memorandum for Chancellor Kohl, Bonn, December 6, 1989

In this memorandum, foreign policy adviser Horst Teltschik confirms to the chancellor that the “10 Points” program did not disagree with the Soviet proposals presented to him through the confidential channel, but rather was based on those positions, which he attaches to his memo.  The actual memos that CPSU Central Committee staff member Nikolai Portugalov brought to Teltschik on November 21, 1989 are not known to exist in other copies, except for these.  Apparently, the reason Teltschik writes his memorandum to Kohl on December 6 is that the Germans are perplexed by the vehemently negative Soviet reaction to the “10 Points” (especially in Gorbachev’s conversation with Genscher on December 5).  In his memorandum, Teltschik recommends that Kohl meet with Gorbachev and discuss the situation, but the Soviet leader puts off any such discussions until February.

Document No. 7: British Ambassador to the USSR Sir Rodric Braithwaite’s Telegram to Douglas Hurd, December 8, 1989

In this confidential telegram the perceptive British Ambassador describes the “suspicious and emotional mood” of the Soviet leadership regarding Kohl’s “10 Points” and German unification.  Braithwaite is not aware of the Portugalov mission, but he vividly describes the author of the ploy – Valentin Falin – as having “the depressed air of a man whose life’s work was crumbling.”  Falin, according to Braithwaite, was “strikingly bitter about Kohl’s alleged failure to warn Gorbachev about the 10 points.”  That bitterness probably explains the fact that there is no mention of this story in Falin’s memoirs.


Notes

1. Bush and Scowcroft, A World Transformed, 194-196.

Bush and Gorbachev at Malta – Secret Documents from Soviet and U.S. Files

Soviet and American leaders at the dinner table during the Malta Summit

Washington, D.C., July 28th – President George H.W. Bush approached the Malta summit with Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev 20 years ago this week determined to avoid arms control topics and simply promote a public image of “new pace and purpose” with him “leading as much as Gorbachev”; but realized from his face-to-face discussions that Gorbachev was offering an arms race in reverse, according to previously secret documents posted today on the Web by the National Security Archive (www. nsarchive.org).

Mikhail and Raisa Gorbachev with Pope John Paul II, December 1, 1989

The documents include the most complete transcript of the Malta summit ever published – excerpted from the forthcoming book, “Masterpieces of History”: The Peaceful End of the Cold War in Europe, 1989 (edited by Svetlana Savranskaya, Thomas Blanton, and Vladislav Zubok for the Central European University Press). The transcript is a translation of the Soviet record from the Gorbachev Foundation, since the U.S. memcons remain, astonishingly, still classified at the George H.W. Bush Library in Texas.

The posting also includes the transcript of Gorbachev’s historic meeting before Malta with Pope John Paul II at the Vatican, featuring remarkable agreement on values and the “common European home,” including the Polish pontiff’s statement that “Europe should breathe with two lungs.” From the American side, the documents include the before-and-after National Security Council talking points prepared for Bush, the preparatory memos to Bush from Secretary of State James Baker and other top aides, intelligence briefings for Bush from the CIA and the State Department, and the Bush script and briefing book contents list for Malta itself – all obtained through the Freedom of Information Act.

The documents show profound misjudgments of Gorbachev on the American side, including the President’s assumption that the Soviet leader would press for the removal of U.S. troops from Europe, not realizing until talking to Gorbachev directly that, just as Gorbachev had already announced publicly on multiple occasions, he believed the U.S. presence along with the NATO alliance to be a stabilizing force in Europe, particularly against any danger of German revanchism.

The documents signal a major missed opportunity at Malta to meet Soviet arms reductions proposals halfway, and suggest that the Bush “pause” in U.S.-Soviet relations during 1989 effectively delayed both strategic and tactical demilitarization for at least two years (the START treaty would not be signed until 1991, and only in September 1991 would Bush withdraw tactical nuclear weapons from U.S. Navy ships), at which point Gorbachev had effectively lost the domestic power to deliver on his side.

Gorbachev had sought to engage president-elect Bush as early as the Governor’s Island meeting in New York in December 1988, but Bush demurred, instead launching a strategic review of U.S.-Soviet relations that cloaked the reality that the transition from Reagan to Bush was one from doves to hawks, that is, disbelievers in Gorbachev as a true reformer. Throughout 1989, judging by the candid memoir authored by President Bush with his national security adviser Brent Scowcroft (Note 1), the Bush mentality was marked by insecurity and anxiety that Gorbachev was more popular globally and had the initiative on proposing new departures in security policy – never quite recognizing that Gorbachev’s proposals might well be in the U.S. national security interest. (Note 2)

Not until Bush went to Eastern Europe himself in July 1989, where he heard the reform Communists like Jaruzelski in Poland and Nemeth in Hungary plead with him to reach out to Gorbachev because that created political space for them to make change – and even more importantly, where he met the dissidents and oppositionists like Lech Walesa in Poland, who called U.S. aid proposals “pathetic,” (Note 3) or Janos Kis in Hungary whom Bush quickly concluded should not be running his country – did Bush overrule his advisers and ask Gorbachev for a meeting, meaning to slow down the process of change in Eastern Europe. Bush wrote in his memoir:  “I realized that to put off a meeting with Gorbachev was becoming dangerous. Too much was happening in the East – I had seen it myself – and if the superpowers did not begin to manage events [!], those very events could destabilize Eastern Europe and Soviet-American relations… I saw that the Eastern Europeans themselves would try to push matters as far as they could.” (Note 4)

Minister Genscher presents Bush with a piece of the Berlin Wall during his visit to Washington on November 21, 1989

Characteristically, on the plane ride home from Europe in July when Bush sent a note to Gorbachev inviting the Malta meeting, the President spent more time (and far more space in his memoir (Note 5)) reaching out to the Communist dictators in China who had murdered their pro-democracy demonstrators in 1989, than to the Communist reformer in Moscow who had refused to do so.

Gorbachev’s own frustration with the Bush “pause” and review of policy made the Soviet leader more than eager for such a meeting; but between the July idea and the December reality, Eastern Europeans rushed in and took apart the Stalinist empire including the Berlin Wall. Originally intended as an “interim” meeting to prepare for a full-scale summit in 1990, the Bush-Gorbachev meeting at Malta would take on a life of its own, symbolically closing the Cold War.  Stormy weather and raging seas in Malta would play havoc with the meeting planners’ idea of alternating U.S. and Soviet ships as picturesque sites for the meetings – thus providing something of a metaphor for the rush of events in Eastern Europe that ran out of the control of both superpowers.

Going into the Malta summit, the Bush team was determined to do the opposite of what Ronald Reagan had so successfully achieved in relieving the Soviet sense of threat through substantive arms control discussions, including remarkable commitments to the abolition of nuclear weapons. Instead, as the NSC preparatory points make clear, Malta was meant to avoid any substantive discussion of arms control, and simply convey, as Secretary of State Baker wrote in his briefing memo on November 29, “a public sense, here and abroad, of a new pace and purpose to the U.S.-Soviet dialogue with you leading as much as Gorbachev” – public relations in place of substance. The briefing memo from arms negotiation advisor Gen. Edward Rowny described the START treaty as having “potential risks and few gains” and any reductions in naval weapons “all losers for us” – recommending that Bush should say up front that the “US Navy is not on the bargaining table.”

Bush’s briefing book for Malta betrays the administration’s actual priorities – Eastern Europe and its revolutionary changes were way down the contents list, along with arms control. Pride of place was Central America, where Bush’s right flank in domestic politics believed Castro was the devil, the Nicaraguan Sandinistas were a Communist beachhead pointed at Texas, and Gorbachev himself was merely a new glove around the iron fist. In the Malta discussions, the Soviet leader called the American presumptions laughable: “It is not quite clear to us what you want from Nicaragua. There is political pluralism in that country, there are more parties than in the United States.  And the Sandinistas – what kind of Marxists are they? This is laughable. Where are the roots of the problem?  At the core are economic and social issues.” Likewise on Cuba: “The issue now is how to improve the current situation. There is a simple and well-proven method: one has to speak directly to Castro. You must learn: nobody can lord it over Castro.”

Malta’s most significant outcome would simply be the reassurance it provided to the two leaders through a face-to-face meeting, and the building of a personal relationship on which both would rely in the difficult next two years. Gorbachev, for example, told Bush: “First and foremost, the new U.S. president must know that the Soviet Union will not under any circumstances initiate a war. This is so important that I wanted to repeat the announcement to you personally. Moreover, the USSR is prepared to cease considering the U.S. as an enemy and announce this openly.”

Gorbachev also made an impact on Bush in the discussion of values. He bristled at Bush’s repeated reference to “Western values” (a phrase found throughout the U.S. briefing materials for Malta) and argued that the U.S. approach of “exporting ‘Western values'” would cause “ideological confrontations [to] flare up again” in “propaganda battles” with “no point.” Just before Malta, Gorbachev had found agreement on this point with Pope John Paul II, when the two of them discussed “universal human values” and the Pope commented, “it would be wrong for someone to claim that changes in Europe and the world should follow the Western model.” Even though Bush told Helmut Kohl on December 3 that Gorbachev did not understand Western values, the American president subsequently adopted Gorbachev’s phrasing, saying in his Brussels remarks immediately after the summit that the need to end the division of Europe was in accord with “values that are becoming universal ideals.”

After Malta, the Americans raced to catch up with the arms control opportunities on offer from Gorbachev.  NSC aide Condoleezza Rice wrote the preparatory memo for the NSC meeting on December 5, 1989, saying “The President has now committed himself to an ambitious arms control agenda before the June 1990 summit” and “the bureaucracy must not get in the way of the completion of the treaties” – yet the START deal would not be done until 1991 because of recalcitrance from Defense Secretary Dick Cheney and the U.S. Navy over on-site verification (the Soviets were willing to be more open than the American sailors) and cherished weapons like submarine-launched cruise missiles (in a classic contradiction between actual national security interest and the parochial interest of the military service involved, the U.S. had far more coastal metropolises that could be threatened with these weapons than the Soviet Union did).


DocumentsDocument 1
Department of State, U.S. Embassy Moscow, “Preparing for Malta: Trade Policy Toward the USSR,” [cable from Ambassador Jack Matlock], November 14, 1989

The U.S. Ambassador to Moscow starts his recommendations for Malta with the objective that “we should be searching for ways in which we can, in a practical way, signal U.S. support for perestroyka.”  At the same time, he finds that this support should be the mission of primarily the private sector because “the United States government can have little direct economic impact, since there is no way in which we can or should practically or politically mount an economic aid program for the USSR.”  While expressing his preference that the Jackson-Vanik amendment limiting aid to the USSR should be waived, he realized that it would probably not be done before Malta.  In this situation, he suggests that even before the formal waiver of the amendment, the President should send a signal of encouragement to the U.S. business community to “enter trade and investment relations with Soviet firms.”

Document 2
Department of State.  Information Memorandum to Secretary Baker from Douglas P. Mulholland (INR). “Regional Issues at Malta:  Gorbachev’s Agenda.”  November 17, 1989

This assessment of Gorbachev’s positions on regional issues, from State’s Intelligence and Research bureau, is quite accurate in pointing out that regional issues, apart from Afghanistan, do not represent priorities for the Soviet leader, and that he would prefer to discuss arms control and Eastern Europe instead.  On Afghanistan, the memo correctly states that “Gorbachev will probably claim Pakistani and at least implicitly US violations of the Geneva accords” and draw implications for the ability of the US and the USSR to work together on other regional issues.  The memo underestimates Gorbachev’s willingness to engage in constructive discussion on Central America.  However, one prediction comes very close—Gorbachev does seem to “decide that the best approach [on Central America] is to go on the offensive”—which he does during the summit, questioning the US use of force in Colombia, Panama and the Philippines.

Document 3
Department of State. Information Memorandum to Secretary Baker from Gen. Edward L. Rowny [Special Adviser for Arms Control].  November 17, 1989

This concise memo sums up the American position going into Malta, that “the meeting must not become an ‘arms control summit'” – since the Bush administration believed that Reagan had gone much too far in embracing Gorbachev and major arms reductions.  Long-time SALT negotiator and retired Army general Rowny even goes so far as to recommend “If Gorbachev says that Malta should move arms control forward, we should focus the discussion on process and not engage on substance…” since “there are potential risks and few gains in discussing START,” various potential Gorbachev offers such as “moratoria on fissionable materials and production of strategic weapons” “are all losers for us,” and naval arms control is a “no-win situation.”  By 1991, of course, Bush would reverse course on almost all these positions, but too late to help Gorbachev demilitarize the Soviet Union.

Document 4
National Intelligence Estimate 11-18-89. The Soviet System in Crisis: Prospects for the Next Two Years

This consensus view of the U.S. intelligence community two weeks before Malta helps explain the lack of urgency on the part of the Bush administration to wrap up arms control deals with Gorbachev.  This Estimate assumes that the current crisis in the USSR would continue even beyond the two-year timeframe, that “the regime will maintain the present course,” that Gorbachev was “relatively secure” in his leadership role, and there was a less likely scenario of “unmanageable” decline that would lead to a “repressive crackdown.”   In hindsight, the dissenting view from the CIA’s Deputy Director for Intelligence, John Helgerson, is more correct, predicting more progress towards a “pluralist – albeit chaotic – democratic system” in which Gorbachev’s political strength would “erode” and he would “progressively lose control of events.”

Document 5
Department of State. Information Memorandum to Secretary Baker from Douglas P. Mulholland (INR). “Soviet Thinking on the Eve of Malta.” November 29, 1989

This prescient memo clearly draws on reporting from recent interlocutors with Gorbachev such as Canadian prime minister Brian Mulroney, and predicts Gorbachev’s agenda at Malta as “a chance to polish his image and probe US thinking” on such issues as arms control and Eastern Europe.  The assessment of Gorbachev’s substantive priorities is generally accurate, as well as the prediction of the Soviet leader’s push for faster START and CFE negotiations and concrete results.  In contrast to the Cold War suspicions that dominated thinking in the Bush White House, Mulholland is aware that Gorbachev is not trying to push the United States out of Europe, but in fact “is more likely, however, to argue that US and Soviet forces in Europe have a stabilizing effect.”  He correctly predicts that Gorbachev would insist that German unification “can only occur in the context of the creation of a “common European home,” but misses the point in suggesting that “given the Kohl [10 point] proposal, Gorbachev might raise the eventual creation of a German ‘confederation.'”

Document 6
Department of State. Memorandum for The President from Secretary of State James Baker. “Your December Meeting With Gorbachev.” November 29, 1989

This five-page memo from President Bush’s most trusted long-time friend and adviser provides a scene-setter and a provisional script for the President to use with Gorbachev.  Baker’s summary details the limited expectations on the American side for the Malta meeting, merely “to gain a clearer understanding” and to “probe Gorbachev’s thinking” while kicking the major issues down the road to a full-scale summit in 1990.  Perhaps most interesting is the third sentence of the first paragraph, which reveals the underlying public relations concern of the Bush administration about Gorbachev’s popularity and criticisms of Bush’s “pause”: “Further, Malta could promote a public sense, here and abroad, of a new pace and purpose to the U.S.-Soviet dialogue with you leading as much as Gorbachev.”

Document 7
The White House. Memorandum to The President from National Security Adviser Brent Scowcroft. “National Security Council Meeting, November 30, 1989.” [With attachments: Agenda, Points to be Made, List of Participants]

This preparatory memo for the NSC meeting just before Bush went to Malta is perhaps most interesting for the contrast with the NSC meeting that occurred when Bush returned (see Document 12 below).  Here the focus is to “put a damper on expectations” about Malta, to stop people from “getting carried away” given the changes in Eastern Europe, and to reiterate that the President is determined not “to negotiate arms control; the future of Europe; or economic issues.”

Document 8
Transcript of Gorbachev-John Paul II Meeting, Vatican City, December 1, 1989 [Transcribed notes by Aleksandr Yakovlev.]

On the way to the Malta summit, Mikhail Gorbachev stops in Vatican City for his historic meeting with Pope John Paul II, the Polish pontiff from Krakow who had been such an inspiration to the Solidarity movement. Only the second time a leader of Russia had met with a pope, the first being the meeting between Tsar Nicholas I and Pope Gregory XVI in 1845, (Note 6) here the Soviet leader and his wife Raisa would hear the Vatican band performing the Internationale first and then the Papal Hymn. In this conversation, transcribed from notes by Politburo member Aleksandr Yakovlev (and published here for the first time in any language), the Pope raises concerns about religious freedom in the Soviet Union and the Vatican’s relations with various Orthodox and Catholic denominations, while the Soviet leader talks about issues that he planned to discuss with President Bush in Malta, such as the concept of universal human values, particularly objecting to the use of the phrase “Western values” as the basis for world order. Gorbachev describes his vision of Europe and the new world where “universal human values should become the primary goal, while the choice of this or that political system should be left up to the people.” That vision would also include gradual change of structures with respect for human rights and freedom of conscience. The Pope responds by saying he shared Gorbachev’s vision, especially as far as values are concerned—”[i]t would be wrong for someone to claim that changes in Europe and the world should follow the Western model. This goes against my deep convictions. Europe, as a participant in world history, should breathe with two lungs.”

Document 9
The President’s Meetings with Soviet President Gorbachev, December 2-3, 1989, Malta [Briefing Book for the President]. Excerpts (contents pages, selected released pages). Source: George H.W. Bush Library, FOIA request 99-0273-F

The table of contents for President Bush’s briefing book going into the Malta meeting provides a useful summary of American priorities for the discussions with the Soviet leader. The highest priority does not go the revolutionary changes in Eastern Europe, which come second on the American list to regional issues and specifically developments in Central America and Cuba – issues of greatest interest to President Bush’s conservative critics in the Republican Party, not to mention his electoral base in Florida. And arms control issues, where Gorbachev is ready and eager to move forward, rank sixth on the list. The complete set of background papers has not yet been declassified, but included in this package are several interesting summary papers, including the first three on Central America and Cuba, two on U.S. policy toward Eastern Europe and the GDR, one on the Soviet domestic situation, and one on the conventional forces negotiations.

Document 10
Transcript of the Malta Meeting, December 2-3, 1989. Source: Gorbachev Foundation, Fond 1, Opis 1

The Soviet record of the Malta meeting has been available to scholars at the Gorbachev Foundation in Moscow starting in 1993, and the Foundation’s documents books as well as memoirs by Gorbachev aides and the former Soviet leader himself have published a variety of lengthy excerpts amounting to an almost complete transcript of the Malta meeting from the Soviet side, while the American transcripts still have not been declassified at the George Bush Library (Texas A & M University) despite Freedom of Information requests that date back at least 10 years. Here, National Security Archive experts combine the various published and unpublished excerpts to produce and translate the most complete transcript yet available anywhere.

The transcript shows little trace of the fierce winter storm that disrupted the planned back-and-forth between U.S. and Soviet ships as the meeting venues at Malta, but instead demonstrates the growth of personal reassurance between the American and Soviet leaders, along with a few tempests over issues like “Western values” (see discussion above) and American pressures on Central America. Interestingly, in an extended discussion with Baker and Shevardnadze, the two sides approach agreement on a negotiation to end the protracted war in Afghanistan, where the Soviets had already completed their withdrawal but the Najibullah government had not fallen as the Americans had expected.  Baker bluntly remarks, “Stop your massive assistance to Kabul” – to which Gorbachev responds, “Leave this empty talk behind” and tells the Americans that tribal leaders are already talking with Najibullah, that the Afghan “dialogue itself will clarify this issue” in a “transition period” and “If the Afghans themselves decide that Najibullah must leave – God help them. This is their business.”

Apparently the biggest surprise to the Americans is Gorbachev’s insistence that the U.S. should stay in Europe, that the U.S. and USSR “are equally integrated into European problems” and that they need to work together to keep those problems from exploding. (Note 7) The American president responds with classic expressions of reserve and prudence, insisting that he does not intend to posture over East Germany even though he was under severe domestic political pressure to “climb the Berlin Wall and to make broad declarations.” Bush affirms his support for perestroika, and reassures Gorbachev that they both remember the Helsinki Final Act’s pronouncements on the inviolability of borders. In general, the American wants to talk about practical details, such as specific congressional amendments on the U.S. side or arms deliveries in Central America from the Soviet bloc, while Gorbachev initiates broader philosophical discussions: “The world is experiencing a major regrouping of forces.”

But both men are clearly uneasy about the dramatic transformations taking place. Bush frankly pronounces himself “shocked by the swiftness” while Gorbachev says “look at how nervous we are.” After warning Bush not to provoke or accelerate the changes, the Soviet leader in particular seems to ask what kind of collective action they should take. He stresses the Helsinki process as the new European process and also mentions the Giscard d’Estaing comment in January 1989 about a federal state of Western Europe: “Therefore, all of Europe is on the move, and it is moving in the direction of something new. We also consider ourselves Europeans, and we associate this movement with the idea of a common European home.” Gorbachev hopes for the dissolution of the blocs – “what to do with institutions created in another age?” – and suggests that the Warsaw Pact and NATO become, to an even greater degree, political organizations rather than military ones.

On the German question, neither leader expects events to move as fast as they would the following year. Just days before Malta, on November 28, Helmut Kohl announced his “10 Points” towards confederation in a Bundestag speech that the Soviet Foreign Ministry denounced as pushing change in “a nationalist direction.” At Malta, Gorbachev attributes the speech to politics and said Kohl “does not act seriously and responsibly.” But then Gorbachev asks whether a united Germany would be neutral or a member of NATO, suggesting that at least theoretically he imagined the latter, although he may simply have been acknowledging the U.S. position. His clear preference is for the continuation of two states in Germany and only very slow progress towards any unification:  “let history decide.” Bush is not eager for rapid progress either: “I hope that you understand that you cannot expect us not to approve of German reunification.  At the same time … [w]e are trying to act with a certain reserve.”

Document 11
Directives for the Ministers of Foreign Affairs of the USSR and the United States. Draft by Soviet delegation at Malta. December 3, 1989. Source: George H.W. Bush Library, FOIA request

This draft prepared by Gorbachev’s aides envisions quick progress across the entire spectrum of U.S.-Soviet relations, starting with the proclamation that the Presidents at Malta “came to a common conclusion that the period of cold war was over and that the emerging era of peace opened up unprecedented opportunities for multilateral and bilateral partnership.” The draft calls for preparation for a full-scale “watershed” summit in 1990, and puts “harmonizing national interests with universal human values” as a top priority for the two countries. The Soviet proposal outlines a comprehensive program of arms control with the goal of “creating a fundamentally new model of security.” In addition to quick progress on START and “radical reduction of Soviet and U.S. stationed forces in Europe,” the Soviet draft calls for discussion of “Open Skies, Open Seas, Open Land and Open Space” proposals. This draft shows that the Soviet side came to Malta with an ambitious arms control program – exactly what the Bush administration was trying to avoid – but the Malta discussions would lead directly to a growing Bush embrace of the arms reduction possibilities on offer.

Document 12
National Security Council. Memorandum for Brent Scowcroft from Condoleezza Rice. December 5, 1989. [With attachments: Memo to the President. Points to be Made. List of Participants (for NSC meeting on December 5, 1989). Agenda.]

The contrast between the NSC meetings before Malta (“dampen expectations,” no negotiating arms control) and after Malta comes through clearly in this concise cover memo from Soviet specialist Condoleezza Rice to her boss, the national security adviser, enclosing the briefing memo and talking points that Scowcroft would then forward to President Bush. “The President has now committed himself to an ambitious arms control agenda before the June 1990 summit” and “bureaucracy must not get in the way,” Rice writes. If such urgency had been present at the White House earlier in 1989, perhaps it would not have taken two more years to finish the START treaty or make the withdrawals of nuclear weapons that would not be accomplished until the month after the August 1991 coup against Gorbachev.

Document 13
Excerpt from Anatoly S. Chernyaev’s Diary, January 2, 1990

In this entry Gorbachev’s senior foreign policy aide reflects on Gorbachev’s meeting with the Pope and the legacy of the Malta summit, since in the press of events, he had not managed to write down his commentary in the moment. The main point Chernyaev sees about Malta, a month later, is the “normalcy” of the summit, the shared understanding that the Soviet Union and the United States are partners and nobody would attack the other, therefore, the threat of nuclear war is a thing of the past, as is the Cold War itself. Chernyaev sees Gorbachev making an intentional effort at Malta to discard this old reality of the Soviet threat, of the “terror” projected by the Soviet Union in Europe as a result of its invasions and repressions. In Malta, according to Chernyaev, Gorbachev and Bush “gave hope to all humanity,” and at the Vatican, Gorbachev and the Pope “spoke like two good Christians.” The world has changed indeed.


Notes

1. George Bush and Brent Scowcroft, A World Transformed (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1998), see for example pp. 40, 43, 71, 78, 114.

2. For extended analysis of the Bush administration’s characteristic insecurity, see Thomas Blanton, “U.S. Policy and the Revolutions of 1989,” in Svetlana Savranskaya, Thomas Blanton and Vladislav Zubok, eds., “Masterpieces of History”: The Peaceful End of the Cold War in Europe, 1989 (Budapest/New York: Central European University Press, 2010).

3. For the colorful details of these uncomfortable meetings, see Victor Sebestyan, Revolution 1989:  The Fall of the Soviet Empire (New York, Pantheon Boooks, 2009), pp. 303-305.

4. Bush and Scowcroft, p. 130.

5. Bush and Scowcroft, p. 132 compared to pp. 156-159.

6.Victor Sebestyen, Revolution 1989:  The Fall of the Soviet Empire, (New York, Pantheon Books, 2009), p. 401.

7. Condoleezza Rice subsequently called Gorbachev’s position at Malta on the U.S. staying in Europe “revolutionary change” and “something I never imagined I would hear from a Soviet leader” (see Victor Sebestyan, Revolution 1989, p. 403), but Gorbachev had explicitly made such assurances to the Trilateral Commission delegation in January 1989 in answering a question from Henry Kissinger, repeatedly in conversations with Margaret Thatcher and Helmut Kohl, among other leaders, and publicly in his famous Strasbourg speech on June 6, 1989.  The Americans were apparently not listening, and as late as November 21, 1989, President Bush had suggested to West German foreign minister Genscher, much to the latter’s surprise and disagreement, that Gorbachev would propose at Malta the withdrawal of U.S. troops from Germany and Europe – the old American fear that the Soviets were attempting to “decouple” the U.S. from Europe.  See Bush-Genscher memcon, November 21, 1989, George Bush Library, released under 2007-0051-MR.

CONFIDENTIAL: EXPLAINING VENEZUELAN ACQUIESCENCE


Bernd Pulch

VZCZCXRO1837PP RUEHAG RUEHROV RUEHSRDE RUEHCV #0692/01 1561512ZNY CCCCC ZZHP 051512Z JUN 09FM AMEMBASSY CARACASTO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 3144INFO RUCNMEM/EU MEMBER STATES COLLECTIVE PRIORITYRUEHWH/WESTERN HEMISPHERIC AFFAIRS DIPL POSTS PRIORITYRUMIAAA/HQ USSOUTHCOM MIAMI FL PRIORITYRHEHNSC/NSC WASHDC PRIORITY
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 04 CARACAS 000692 

SIPDIS 

HQSOUTHCOM ALSO FOR POLAD DEPARTMENT PASS TO AID/OTI (RPORTER) 

E.O. 12958: DECL: 06/04/2019 TAGS: PGOV PREL KDEM SOCI VESUBJECT: EXPLAINING VENEZUELAN ACQUIESCENCE 

CARACAS 00000692  001.2 OF 004 

Classified By: POLITICAL COUNSELOR FRANCISCO FERNANDEZ, REASONS 1.4 (B) AND (D) 

1. (C) Summary.  President Chavez's efforts to concentrate more power in his hands and undermine the democratic opposition have been met in Venezuela with more acceptance and resignation than outrage and resistance.  There are numerous, credible theories to explain Venezuelans' acquiescence to an increasingly authoritarian government ranging from Chavez's charismatic leadership and popular social programs to the fear, fatigue, and ineffectiveness that prevail among government opponents.  Moreover, the majority of Venezuelans, long reliant on their petro-state's largesse, appear to prioritize "social rights" and self-preservation over abstract civil liberties.  The enormous, corporatist Government of the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela (GBRV) is for many citizens both an irreplaceable provider and exclusive source of information. Finally, Chavez has also effectively and systematically squelched any opposition to his rule either from within his ranks or from other political parties.  While Chavez's popularity may gradually erode as he radicalizes and the local economy worsens, the Venezuelan president still appears well positioned to keep accelerating his Bolivarian revolution at the expense of remaining democratic institutions.  End Summary. 

--------------------------- Increasing Authoritarianism --------------------------- 

2. (C) Since winning the February 15 referendum eliminating term limits, President Chavez has accelerated his Bolivarian revolution, further undermining political and economic freedoms in Venezuela.  In recent months the Chavez government has clamped down on leading opposition members while simultaneously using the National Assembly to close off any possible avenue for the opposition.  The GBRV pressed a corruption case against former Defense Minister Raul Baduel and Maracaibo Mayor and 2006 consensus opposition presidential candidate Manuel Rosales.  Baduel is awaiting trial in a military prison; Rosales fled to Peru.  The National Assembly passed laws that allowed the central government to take control over highways, ports, and airports previously controlled by state governments.  The Chavez government selectively applied the measure in states run by opposition governors. 

3. (C) In addition, the National Assembly created a new presidentially appointed position to run Caracas, removing virtually all responsibilities and funding from the recently elected opposition mayor of Caracas.  A law expanding this model to opposition-led states is reportedly in the works. The National Assembly is also actively considering a law that would give Chavez's PSUV party a significant advantage in the allocation of seats in legislative elections.  Moreover, the National Electoral Council intends to suspend any elections until work on the draft law is complete.  Chavez recently threatened to close Globovision, the only remaining opposition-oriented television network, and GBRV officials are pressing charges against Globovision's president.  The GBRV also nationalized over 50 oil service companies and has not yet offered swift and equitable compensation.  The GBRV has also intervened in the food industry, nationalizing a plant owned by U.S. agribusiness giant Cargill and occupying a second, as well as nationalizing land owned by FEMSA, the Mexican company that bottles and distributes Coca-Cola in Venezuela. 

4. (C) The opposition's response to these measures has been muted.  On May 1, the Caracas Metropolitan Police quickly dispersed a relatively small crowd of opposition marchers with tear gas.  There were far more Venezuelans stuck in beach traffic during that long weekend than took to the streets in defense of their liberties.  University students and faculty led an inconsequential march of several thousand to the Ministry of Education on May 20 primarily to protest higher education budget cuts.  Fewer than five thousand persons participated in a May 27 protest against the threatened shut down of Globovision.  Moreover, Chavez continues to enjoy considerable support in the polls, despite growing public dissatisfaction with key issues, such as crime and inflation.  Prominent pollster Alfredo Keller told us recently that Chavez is slipping in the polls, but still enjoys roughly 60% support; Luis Vicente Leon of Datanalisis put Chavez's popularity at over 54% as of April.  Edmond Saade of Datos also confirmed recently that Chavez enjoys majority support and far more support than any other public figure. 

------------------------- Hope and Purchasing Power ------------------------- 

5. (C) There are numerous reasons why Venezuelans are acquiescing to Chavez's anti-democratic measures.  The charismatic Venezuelan president conveys far more hope to voters than any of his competitors.  State media outlets constantly laud government initiatives, social programs, and "achievements of the revolution."  Chavez himself regularly launches building projects, opens government cooperatives, or announces expropriations on his weekly "Alo, Presidente" radio and television talk show.  While government critics rightly point out that many of the GBRV's projects are unsustainable, inefficient, or corrupt, local pollsters point out that Venezuela's poor report that they have more money in their pockets.  Large numbers of Venezuelans also avail themselves of GBRV social programs, most commonly shopping at subsidized Mercal or Pdval stores, or receiving medical care courtesy of the Barrio Adentro program.  "At least Chavez has given us something," is prevalent local sentiment among sectors of society long reliant on government largesse ("Papa estado"). 

---------------------------------- Class Resentment and Social Rights ---------------------------------- 

6. (C) Chavez has also reaped political gains by stoking class antagonisms in stratified Venezuela.  Railing against local "oligarchs," the Venezuelan president aims most of his economic "reforms" at large, and often foreign, enterprises. Although the vast majority of Venezuelan still support private property protections, there is little popular sympathy for big business in Venezuela, and as yet, little public recognition of the long-term economic effects of driving out foreign investment.  Moreover, Chavez's core supporters believe that they would lose anything gained over the last decade if Chavez were to fail.  Chavez has sought to reassure his base that he is not undermining their economic freedoms.  One week after seizing large tracts of farmland in his native state of Barinas, Chavez distributed property titles last week to urban squatters in a televised ceremony. Local pollsters note that in this context most Venezuelans prioritize "social rights" over civil liberties.  They tend to be more attracted to Chavez's promises of redistribution of wealth than alarmed by his concentration of power. 

-------------------- Frog in a Teflon Pot -------------------- 

7. (C) To explain Venezuelans' relative docility, many pundits also cite the analogy that a live frog placed in boiling water will try to escape, but if placed in water gradually heated up, it will die unsuspectingly.  The Venezuelan president reportedly leans heavily on polls and has carefully calibrated the pace of change so as not to get too far in front of public opinion.  Chavez has paused in the face of opposition to politically charged education overhaul, a Counterintelligence Law, and the proposed anti-NGO Law of International Cooperation.  He accepted a narrow electoral defeat in the December 2007 constitutional referendum, but later enacted many of the proposed reforms through a compliant legislature.  He also subsequently won acceptance for the elimination of term limits in the February 2009 referendum. 

8. (C) With full control over all other branches of government, Chavez usually succeeds in imposing his will through ostensibly "legal" means.  Constitutional experts' arguments to the contrary tend to get lost on most voters. For example, most Venezuelans are far more concerned about obtaining good government services than they are interested in a debate as to whether the central government or state and local governments should provide such services.  When Venezuelans do express dissatisfaction with the government, they tend to blame Chavez's ministers and other senior officials rather than Chavez himself.  This holds true despite the fact that Chavez selects all senior GBRV officials and generally rotates a small, closed circle of confidants to key positions. 

---------------- What Opposition? ---------------- 

9. (C) Some local pundits call the political opposition Chavez's best ally.  Ten years after Chavez was first elected, the democratic opposition is still talking about the need to articulate a politically attractive, democratic alternative.  Opposition parties regrettably are still mostly personalist vehicles with no discernible party platforms. Moreover, almost all opposition parties are relatively strong in specific regions and lack a genuine nationwide presence. With few exceptions, most opposition leaders have focused on criticizing Venezuela's Teflon president rather than engage in much-need grassroots organizing among Venezuela's poor. Chavez's United Socialist Party of Venezuela (PSUV) enjoys a virtual monopoly in Venezuela's countryside.  Moreover, opposition parties continue to squabble among themselves, and there is currently no single opposition leader who enjoys anything approaching the popularity of Chavez. 

10. (C) Opposition parties failed to unite in a few key gubernatorial and numerous mayoral races in November 2008, allowing Chavez's United Socialist Party of Venezuela (PSUV) to win races the PSUV otherwise would have lost.  Opposition parties have not yet agreed on a methodology to pick unified candidates for the 2010 parliamentary elections (they foolishly boycotted the 2005 elections).  At the same time, the central government is actively hampering opposition-led states and municipalities to prevent elected opposition leaders from building democratic alternatives to Chavismo. The student movement injected new life into the opposition Q 2007, but student politics are inherently transitory. Numerous student leaders have formally entered politics and visible student activism has declined.  Pro-Chavez dissidents, for their part, have not made much of a dent at the polls so far. 

------------ Fear Matters ------------ 

11. (C) Chavez has also spun what pollster Luis Vicente Leon calls a "web of fear."  Rather than engage in wholesale repression, the GBRV has made examples of prominent sector leaders that have had a chilling effect on the rest of civil society.  For example, the GBRV closed RCTV, launched investigations into electoral NGO Sumate, and recently sentenced three former Caracas police commissioners to 30-year prison terms for their alleged role in the short-lived 2002 coup.  Chavez regularly vilifies selected Catholic bishops and personally announced that Manuel Rosales would be jailed even before charges were brought against him.  Opposition activists receive pointed, threatening phone calls (one former ambassador was told, "We know you have only one kidney."). 

12. (C) The GBRV also allows pro-Chavez thugs, most notably the "La Piedrita" and "Alexis Vive" collectives, to engage in political violence with impunity.  In a society awash in conspiracy theories, Venezuelans are inclined to believe the GBRV is omnipotent.  Moreover, the GBRV has relied heavily on "litmus lists."  Whether you signed the presidential recall referendum drive ("Tascon List") or are among the five million voters who purportedly registered with Chavez's PSUV party can determine whether or not you have access to government services, loans, scholarships, or can even obtain a passport. 

--------------------- Been There, Done That --------------------- 

13. (C) Opposition leaders concede that only a small minority of Venezuelans are inclined to attend protest marches or political rallies.  They note that many Chavez opponents are discouraged by the fact that street protests have done little to change Chavez's decisions or undermine his popularity. Massive opposition rallies in 2002, the 2002-2003 general strike, and the presidential recall referendum drive did not succeed in forcing Chavez from power (except for three days during the April 2002 interregnum).  Rosales' 2006 presidential campaign mobilized large opposition rallies, but Rosales polled only 37% of the vote.  Student-led protests in 2007 did not dissuade the GBRV from shuttering RCTV, nor do they appear to be deterring the GBRV from going after Globovision.  Student leaders recently conceded to us that their street power is only "effervescent." 

------------------------ Accommodation and Plan B ------------------------ 

14. (C) In the absence of hope for change, many Venezuelans, including business and professional elites, have found ways to accommodate themselves to the Bolivarian revolution, or at a minimum, to avoid political risks.  Because the GBRV regulates and dominates the domestic economy so much, private sector leaders argue they have little choice but to find ways to "get along" in order to survive and prosper.  Opposition political parties report that contributions from the private sector have virtually dried up.  Moreover, large numbers of well educated and skilled Venezuelans have chosen flight over fight.  The Spanish, Italian, and Portuguese embassies have all experienced a boom in citizenship claims.  Millions of Venezuelans have claims to citizenship in EU countries due to massive European immigration in the 1950's.  These Venezuelans tend to be middle class, multilingual, and better-educated, making emigration a viable alternative to confronting Venezuela's political and economic problems. There is a six-month backlog for U.S. non-immigrant visa interview appointments.  Jewish community leaders report that their small community has been devastated by the emigration of the younger generation. 

------------------ The Media Monopoly ------------------ 

15. (C) Many Venezuelans appear to be unaware of Chavez's concentration of more power in his hands because the GBRV exerts a virtual monopoly over the news.  Chavez closed RCTV, the only free-to-air network critical of the GBRV in May 2007, and opposition-oriented cable news network Globovision is only free-to-air in Caracas and Valencia.  Six state television channels laud Chavez and cheerlead his Bolivarian revolution while the remaining free-to-air networks exercise considerable self-censorship.  The GBRV also controls a wide network of community radio stations and sustains a continued socialist ideology campaign via thousands of specially trained promoters.  Chavez has also presided over 1200 hours of obligatory TV and radio broadcasts ("cadenas").  Local polling firms all tell us that public opinion is decidedly against further centralization, but most Venezuelans profess to be unaware of Chavez's efforts to undermine elected opposition governors and mayors.  Pollsters also note a marked tendency for Chavez's strongest supporters to give unconditional support to their president. 

------- Comment ------- 

16. (C) Despite controlling all branches of government, centralizing economic activity in the government's hands, controlling the information fed to the majority of the population, and enjoying majority support, President Chavez may yet be confronted by new political challenges.  Public support for him is likely to erode if the ongoing radicalization of the Bolivarian revolution or an economic downturn begin to erode the purchasing power of his political base.  Venezuelans still prefer social democracy to Chavez's ill-defined "Socialism of the 21st Century" by a wide margin and are tired of political polarization, according to local polls. 

17. (C) Nevertheless, Chavez right now appears to be squarely in the driver's seat.  He has recouped personal popularity and survived tough economic times before, including during the 2002-2003 national strike.  Moreover, the Venezuelan president has carefully taken the necessary steps to eliminate any real political challenger, and the opposition has yet to present a concrete, attractive alternative to Chavismo.  He also fully controls the legislature and judiciary, and with parliamentary elections at least 18 months away, Chavez has plenty of time to develop the legal framework to try to stay in power for as long as he wishes. 

CAULFIELD

CONFIDENTIAL: KUALALUMPUR805, PM ABDULLAH’S POSITION ERODED AFTER TUMULTUOUS WEEK


VZCZCXRO1603OO RUEHCHI RUEHDT RUEHHM RUEHNHDE RUEHKL #0805/01 2561233ZNY CCCCC ZZHO 121233Z SEP 08FM AMEMBASSY KUALA LUMPURTO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 1639INFO RUCNASE/ASEAN MEMBER COLLECTIVE PRIORITYRHHMUNA/CDR USPACOM HONOLULU HI PRIORITYRHEHNSC/NSC WASHDC PRIORITY
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 03 KUALA LUMPUR 000805 

SIPDIS 

FOR EAP/MTS 

E.O. 12958: DECL: 09/12/2018 TAGS: PGOV KDEM MARR MYSUBJECT: PM ABDULLAH'S POSITION ERODED AFTER TUMULTUOUS WEEK 

REF: KUALA LUMPUR 787 

Classified By: Political Section Chief Mark D. Clark for reasons 1.4 (b  and d). 

SUMMARY ------- 

1. (C) Prime Minister Abdullah Badawi has seen his political position eroded during a tumultuous week of mounting challenges from within his United Malay National Organization (UMNO), his coalition partners, and the opposition.  While struggling to regain cohesion within his National Front (BN) coalition in the face of inter-racial tensions, UMNO leaders have raised new questions over Abdullah's 2010 transition to his deputy Najib Tun Razak, creating fresh doubts that Abdullah can gain his party's reelection in December. Opposition leader Anwar Ibrahim dispatched his lieutenants to Taiwan with the avowed aim to complete talks with BN members of Parliament who would crossover to bring down Abdullah's government.  At the same time, the Opposition alliance stated the September 16 deadline to topple the government could slip.  The chief of the armed forces clarified that the military would remain apolitical, but could be called out via proper legal channels to assist with internal security. Abdullah emerged from an UMNO meeting to state that the government could use the Internal Security Act (ISA), and its detention without trial provisions, to preserve internal security; on September 12 the government made good on this threat by detaining controversial blogger Raja Petra.  End Summary. 

RACIST COMMENTS PROMPT UMNO LEADERS MEETING ------------------------------------------- 

2. (SBU) To quell growing animosity and tension between UMNO and its ethnic Chinese partners in the National Front coalition resulting from caustic racist comments from Penang UMNO division leader Ahmad Ismail, PM Abdullah was forced to hold a meeting of the BN Supreme Council on September 9 and a gathering of the UMNO Supreme Council on September 10.  The BN leaders referred the matter to UMNO to take action against its own member.  After a three hour meeting, the UMNO Supreme Council decided to suspend Ahmad from the party for three years, stripping him of all of his official duties.  Despite this ruling, Ahmad remained defiant and suggested his Penang division quickly would create a new role for him.  Some of Abdullah's detractors in the party, like Selangor warlord Khir Toyo, came to Ahmad's defense.  The Malaysian Chinese Association (MCA) and the Chinese-dominated Gerakan party voiced their appreciation for UMNO's decision, but also called for a stop to further racially incendiary remarks. 

2010 TRANSITION UNRAVELING? --------------------------- 

3. (C) As Abdullah and UMNO attempted to douse heated racial tensions that damaged the BN coalition, this week also witnessed the fraying of UMNO's acquiescence to Abdullah's plan to hand over power to DPM Najib in 2010.  The most direct blow came from International Trade and Industry Minister Muhyiddin Yassin, an UMNO Vice President who is considered a potential candidate for Deputy Prime Minister should Abdullah step down.  Muhyiddin stated on September 10 that Abdullah should resign well before the June 2010 transition date.  Muhyiddin noted that the initial promise of this two-month old proposal, meant to assuage concerns about Abdullah's sagging popularity and party support, had now "sunk away".  Reacting during a televised press encounter, Abdullah was visibly angered by Muhyiddin's comment. Abdullah questioned why Muhyiddin would challenge the transition plan when the UMNO Supreme Council had already approved the transition and its timing.  On September 12, Deputy Prime Minister Najib Razak appeared to contradict Abdullah and shift his position away from Abdullah's deal, stating that delegates at the December UMNO party elections should approve the transition and its timetable.  Other important UMNO leaders have revived their calls to eliminate high quotas for the number of nominations needed to contest leadership positions in the party polls, a system which now heavily favors Abdullah. 

MAHATHIR SEEKS RETURN TO UMNO ----------------------------- 

4. (SBU) Complicating matters further for Abdullah, former PM and former UMNO President Mahathir, who quit UMNO on May 19 after expressing disgust with Abdullah's leadership, is considering returning to the party.  A smiling UMNO Vice President Muhyiddin told reporters September 9 that Mahathir was persuaded by him, Tengku Razaleigh and several other veteran UMNO leaders at a private meeting at Mahathir's residence on September 6 to rejoin UMNO to help "fix the problems" afflicting the party.  Foreign Minister and senior UMNO official Rais Yatim later joined other party leaders in welcoming Mahathir's proposed return to the fold.  Mahathir reportedly is now backing his former nemesis, Tengku Razaleigh, to unseat Abdullah in the December UMNO party elections.  Commenting tersely on the possible return of Mahathir, whose harsh criticisms of the Prime Minister continue unabated, Abdullah stated September 11 that the UMNO Supreme Council will decide on the issue as "this is a party matter." 

THE OPPOSITION ATTEMPTS TO COUNTER TAIWAN PLOY... --------------------------------------------- ---- 

5. (SBU) Opposition leader Anwar Ibrahim meanwhile sought to keep the pressure on UMNO and BN by dispatching four senior officials from this Peoples Justice Party's (PKR) to Taiwan, supposedly to meet with BN MP's who may crossover to bring down Abdullah's government.  BN had hastily arranged a "study tour" to Taiwan for BN members of Parliament, September 8-17, in what is widely viewed as a ploy to thwart September 16 crossovers.  PKR said their officials would attempt to finalize the crossovers (the opposition requires 30 to claim the majority and topple Abdullah's government). 

OPPOSITION ADMITS SEPTEMBER 16 COULD SLIP ----------------------------------------- 

6.  (SBU) As PKR announced its officials were going to Taiwan to finalize crossovers, the opposition People's Alliance (Pakatan) also issued a statement suggesting that the September 16 deadline for toppling BN could slip.  The three-party alliance of PKR, the Democratic Action Party (DAP) and the Islamic Party of Malaysia (PAS), in a September 11 release, explained that the September 16 deadline may have to be postponed due to the Taiwan trip by the BN MPs. However, the coalition expressed confidence that a change of federal government "would happen soon."  Subsequently, BN officials announced that many of the MPs would be returning early from Taiwan, hinting that this should eliminate excuses for Anwar not meeting his September 16 deadline. 

ARMED FORCES TO STAY OUT OF POLITICS, BUT STILL ON CALL --------------------------------------------- ---------- 

7. (SBU) Malaysian Armed Forces Chief General Abdul Aziz Zainal stated at a press conference September 11 that the armed forces have been and will remain apolitical.  The General gave his assurance following questions and criticism from opposition and civil society quarters over his statement on September 9, urging the government to take stern action against anyone stoking racial sentiments in the country and thereby threatening national unity.  "The armed forces are highly professional and apolitical", Abdul Aziz clarified on September 11, and would only get involved in internal matters if requested through the legal process by the authorities or police.  He explained, "Our (the military's) secondary role is to support the police and government agencies in any form of operations where our presence is requested -- such as for internal security, humanitarian and disaster relief operations.8  General Abdul Aziz refused to comment when asked by reporters whether he would support a new government, adding "I do not know of any (impending) changes in government." 

ABDULLAH THREATENS USE OF THE INTERNAL SECURITY ACT --------------------------------------------- ------ 

8. (SBU) PM Abdullah stated September 10, following the UMNO Supreme Council meeting, that he did not rule out the possibility of invoking the Internal Security Act (ISA), which allows detention without trial for those who threaten national security.  He added that the Home Minister, who has the authority to approve ISA detentions, would "think twice or even three times" before deciding to take that step, but "if the minister thinks that it is an appropriate action to be taken, then he will take it." 

9. (SBU) The Prime Minister said that in the September 10 Cabinet meeting, his Ministers expressed concern and described race relations in the country as showing "not so good signs," and that a number of sensitive issues which were not openly discussed before were being raised. Although the government has managed to control the situation thus far, he added that "we cannot allow a fiery situation to prevail as it could jeopardize the peace and security of our country." Responding to a question on whether the government would curtail freedom of speech in the country, the PM explained that there was no such thing as absolute freedom anywhere in the world, noting "People cannot just say whatever they like, in the name of free speech, to the extend that it can offend and hurt others and jeopardize security." 

MAKING GOOD ON THE THREAT ------------------------- 

10.  (SBU) Abdullah's government made good on the threat by arresting controversial blogger Raja Petra Kamaruddin at his home on September 12, using the ISA.  Home Minister Syed Hamid confirmed to reporters that police had detained Raja Petra under the ISA provision for persons who pose threats to "security, peace and public order."  Raja Petra has repeatedly enraged the BN government by, among other things, blunting attacking senior political leaders, connecting DPM Najib to a murder scandal, and condemning the sodomy allegations against Anwar.  Raja Petra currently faces sedition and defamation charges.  Septel provides more details of the arrest and provides suggested press guidance. 

COMMENT ------- 

11.  (C) Abdullah has endured a rough week, one that has eroded his political strength.  The current tone of the direct and indirect challenges to his position are similar to those he faced in the first six weeks after the March 8 election debacle when his continuation in office was an open question.  Two factors are increasing the pressure on Abdullah at this point.  First, UMNO has become unnerved in the face of Anwar Ibrahim's threat to bring down the government this month, and the greater Anwar's menace, the more UMNO elites consider replacing Abdullah with a stronger figure.  Second, the UMNO divisional elections, which select delegates to the December party polls, begin on October 9 almost immediately following the Muslim holidays at the end of the Muslim fasting month.  Those leaders who wish to challenge Abdullah's reelection and his two-year transition to Najib must stake out their positions now and maneuver for support, or the opportunity quickly will be lost. 

KEITH

CONFIDENTIAL: BULGARIA LOOKS TO U.S. FOR “PUSH” ON LIBYA

VZCZCXRO9414
OO RUEHTRO
DE RUEHSF #0430 0821429
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
O 231429Z MAR 06
FM AMEMBASSY SOFIA
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 1654
INFO RUEHZL/EUROPEAN POLITICAL COLLECTIVE IMMEDIATE
RUEHTRO/USLO TRIPOLI IMMEDIATE
C O N F I D E N T I A L SOFIA 000430

SIPDIS

SIPDIS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 03/23/2011
TAGS: PGOV PHUM PREL LY BU
SUBJECT: BULGARIA LOOKS TO U.S. FOR "PUSH" ON LIBYA

REF: TRIPOLI 60

CLASSIFIED BY: AMBASSADOR JOHN BEYRLE, FOR REASONS 1.4 (B) AND (D).

1. (C) SUMMARY: IN A MARCH 23 MEETING WITH THE AMBASSADOR, FOREIGN MINISTER KALFIN EXPRESSED CONCERN THAT NEGOTIATIONS ON THE RELEASE OF BULGARIAN NURSES IN LIBYA WERE "GOING INTO SLEEP MODE" AND SUGGESTED THAT A HIGH-LEVEL PUSH FROM THE U.S. SIDE MIGHT BE THE BEST NEAR-TERM CHANCE OF GETTING TALKS BACK ON TRACK. END SUMMARY.

2. (C) KALFIN'S FRUSTRATION WAS BASED ON THE FACT THAT, DESPITE AGREEMENT FROM ALL SIDES ON A GENERAL FRAMEWORK FOR MOVING FORWARD, MOVEMENT TOWARD THE NURSES' EVENTUAL RELEASE IS STALLED DUE TO DELAYS IN THE SCHEDULING OF A NEW TRIAL AND LACK OF PROGRESS IN NEGOTIATIONS WITH THE VICTIMS' FAMILIES. KALFIN SAID HE UNDERSTANDS THAT THIS IS A "DIFFICULT TIME FOR QADHAFI" AND NOTED THAT RECENT EVENTS IN BENGHAZI HAVE SHOWN THAT THE LIBYAN LEADER "IS NOT MASTERING THE SITUATION." CITING THE LIBYAN COURT'S UPCOMING SUMMER RECESS, KALFIN EXPRESSED CONCERN THAT THE COURT'S FAILURE TO SET A DATE FOR THE NURSES' RETRIAL COULD CAUSE THE ENTIRE PROCESS TO STALL. ACCORDING TO A REPORT RECEIVED BY KALFIN ON MARCH 22, THE LIBYAN COURT IS CONSIDERING HOLDING THE NEW TRIAL IN BENGHAZI, RATHER THAN TRIPOLI AS REPORTED IN REFTEL. KALFIN FELT THAT A BENGHAZI TRIAL WOULD FURTHER COMPLICATE PROGRESS TOWARD A FAVORABLE RESOLUTION.

3. (C) WHEN ASKED BY THE AMBASSADOR WHETHER A NEW ROUND OF MULTILATERAL MEETINGS COULD HELP ADVANCE THE PROCESS, KALFIN WAS PESSIMISTIC, STATING THAT THERE WAS "NOTHING ELSE TO TALK ABOUT ON THE POLITICAL LEVEL." IN ORDER FOR MULTILATERAL MEETINGS TO SUCCEED, HE SAID, IT WOULD FIRST BE NECESSARY FOR THE LIBYAN SIDE TO PROPOSE A TRIAL DATE, A PLAN FOR THE FAMILIES, AND AN ULTIMATE DEADLINE FOR RETURN OF THE MEDICS.

4. (C) REFERRING TO RECENT TALKS WITH THE LIBYAN GOVERNMENT ON DEBT FORGIVENESS, KALFIN SAID THE GOB IS WILLING TO ACCEPT ANY LIBYAN PROPOSAL FOR REVALUATION OF THE DEBT -- "TO FIVE MILLION DOLLARS OR TO FIVE DOLLARS" -- AS LONG AS IT IS PART OF A FINAL SETTLEMENT. HOWEVER, THE BULGARIAN SIDE SEES LITTLE POINT IN NEGOTIATING A SEPARATE AGREEMENT WITH LIBYA ON DEBT REVALUATION WHILE THE FATE OF THE MEDICS REMAINS UNRESOLVED.

5. (C) KALFIN EMPHASIZED THE GOB'S ATTEMPTS TO EXERCISE PUBLIC RESTRAINT ON THE ISSUE IN ORDER TO ENCOURAGE A PRODUCTIVE ATMOSPHERE FOR NEGOTIATIONS. HE SPECIFICALLY MENTIONED THAT BULGARIA HAD STOPPED THE COUNCIL OF EUROPE FROM ISSUING A RESOLUTION ON THE ISSUE ON THREE SEPARATE OCCASIONS, BUT HE NOTED THAT SUCH A POSITION WAS NOT SUSTAINABLE INDEFINITELY. KALFIN ALSO GAVE A READOUT OF PRESIDENT PURVANOVS MARCH 1 PHONE CONVERSATION WITH QADHAFI, STATING THAT IT WAS BROADLY POSITIVE, IF NOT PARTICULARLY SUBSTANTIVE. ACCORDING TO KALFIN, QADHAFI WAS ENGAGED AND APPEARED WELL-INFORMED ON RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN THE CASE, HOWEVER, "YOU NEVER KNOW WITH QADHAFI."

6. (C) COMMENT: IN KALFIN'S WORDS: "IF THERE IS ONE THING THAT INFLUENCES THE LIBYAN POLICY, IT IS THE U.S. POSITION." THE BULGARIANS CONTINUE TO SEE WASHINGTON AS THE MOST INFLUENTIAL INTERNATIONAL PARTY TO THE ONGOING TALKS WITH LIBYA, AND WANT US TO USE OUR INFLUENCE TO KEEP THINGS MOVING. WE BELIEVE THE PREREQUISITES FOR A MULTILATERAL MEETING OUTLINED BY KALFIN IN PARA. 3 ABOVE ARE A BIT STRICT (SURELY THERE CAN BE A MEETING IN ADVANCE OF SETTING A DEADLINE) BUT WOULD WELCOME VIEWS FROM USLO AND WASHINGTON ON NEXT STEPS. END COMMENT. 

BEYRLE

TOP-SECRET: Cracking open the Soviet biological weapons system

Washington, D.C., July 26th 2011 – Internal documents reveal that in the final years of the Cold War the top leadership of the Soviet Union debated the cover-up of their illicit biological weapons program in the face of protests from the United States and Great Britain.

The documents, first disclosed in a new book by David E. Hoffman, The Dead Hand: The Untold Story of the Cold War Arms Race and Its Dangerous Legacy, are being posted in English translation today by the National Security Archive.

The records, along with other evidence reported in the book, show how the Kremlin rebuffed the protests from the West over the massive germ warfare effort. Even after a top Soviet scientist defected to Britain in 1989 and began to reveal details of the program, the Soviet officials decided to continue the concealment. The Soviet program was a violation of the 1972 Biological and Toxin Weapons Convention, which Moscow had signed.

The documents show that Eduard Shevardnadze, the foreign minister, Dmitri Yazov, the defense minister, and Lev Zaikov, the Politburo member overseeing the military-industrial complex, among others, were aware of the concealment and actively involved in discussing it in the years when Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev was advancing his glasnost reforms and attempting to slow the nuclear arms race.

Zaikov reported to Gorbachev about biological weapons in a key memo on May 15, 1990. A translation of the memo is included in the documents being posted today.

The book, The Dead Hand: The Untold Story of the Cold War Arms Race and Its Dangerous Legacy, examines the final years of the superpower competition and explores what happened to the weapons and the weapons scientists after the Soviet collapse. The book was awarded the 2010 Pulitzer Prize for general non-fiction.

The book is based in part on thousands of pages of documents obtained by Hoffman detailing key decisions about the Soviet military-industrial complex and arms control in the 1980s. The documents were collected by Vitaly Katayev, a professional staff member of the Central Committee, and are now deposited at the Hoover Institution at Stanford University. The book is also based on extensive documentation of the final years of the Cold War in the collection of the National Security Archive.


The germ warfare system – a Kremlin struggle, 1989-1990

An anthrax epidemic in the city of Sverdlovsk in 1979 raised suspicions in the West that the Soviet Union was working on offensive biological weapons, in violation of the treaty. Just upwind from the affected neighborhood was a military biological weapons facility. Soviet officials had repeatedly insisted that the Sverdlovsk outbreak had natural causes, such as tainted meat. The true reasons for the outbreak remained hidden.

Starting in the mid-1970s, the Soviet Union had built a massive research organization for biological weapons, known as Biopreparat, which was concealed by a cover story that it was for civilian purposes.

In late October, 1989, Vladimir Pasechnik, one of the leading institute directors in the system, defected to Great Britain.  He began to describe to the British the enormous scope and ambition of the Biopreparat system, which included developing new genetically-engineered pathogens. His revelations were quietly shared with the United States as well.

The Berlin Wall fell November 9, and on December 2-3, President Bush met Gorbachev at the Malta summit. There were many pressing issues, including the future of Germany and Gorbachev’s waning power at home. Bush did not discuss with Gorbachev the disturbing reports about a Soviet biological weapons program.

At the same time, Soviet officials realized that Pasechnik could unmask many of their secrets, and they began to steel themselves for questions. Weeks after the Malta summit, a conflict broke out among Soviet officials about how much to say to the West about the Sverdlovsk anthrax outbreak.

Document 1 – A reference note, or spravka, on the reasons for the Sverdlovsk outbreak.  This draft internal memorandum, dated Dec. 19, 1989, notes the persistent questions from abroad and at home about Sverdlovsk. The memo says there was a high-level discussion about how to respond, and the decision was made to keep up the cover story that the anthrax outbreak had natural causes. However, the memo hints at the possibility that the military compound was linked to the outbreak.
[Source: Hoover Institution Library and Archives, Katayev collection]

On January 5, 1990, the Soviet Foreign Ministry, under Shevardnadze, made a very modest effort to bring some more openness to the issue. The ministry circulated a draft Central Committee resolution to 15 people. The ministry proposed telling the West that the Sverdlovsk accident was under investigation and suggested exchanging some information with the United States about this and other questions surrounding biological weapons.

Document 2 – Ministry of Defense strongly objects. In this January 10, 1990 memo Defense Minister Dmitri Yazov objects to the Foreign Ministry’s proposals for more openness about Sverdlovsk and biological weapons.  Yazov says there was no accident at the military compound and there should be no exchange with the Americans, because this would contradict all the Soviet claims that it never had biological weapons.
[Source: Hoover Institution Library and Archives, Katayev collection]

Document 3 – Foreign Ministry retreats. In this memo, dated January 11, 1990, Viktor Karpov, a deputy Foreign Minister, pulls back, saying that the language in the resolution was “unfortunate ambiguous wording.” It is stricken from the resolution.
[Source: Hoover Institution Library and Archives, Katayev collection]

Document 4 – Central Committee staffers comment.  An excerpt from a memo in which two Central Committee staffers, one of whom is Katayev, comment that Karpov should not have circulated the draft resolution and claim that he had “no right to disclose” information about biological weapons.
[Source: Hoover Institution Library and Archives, Katayev collection]

The United States and Great Britain, now in possession of Pasechnik’s disclosures, quietly confronted the Soviets. On May 14, 1990, the British and American ambassadors in Moscow, Sir Rodric Braithwaite and Jack F. Matlock Jr., delivered a joint démarche, or formal protest. Among others, they took it to Alexander Bessmertnykh, Shevardnadze’s First Deputy.

Document 5 – The Bessmertnykh notes. These are the detailed notes made by Bessmertnykh about the U.S.-British demarche. The two ambassadors said that they had information the Soviet Union had a large-scale, secret program in the field of biological weapons.
[Source: Hoover Institution Library and Archives, Katayev collection]

The demarche got the Kremlin’s attention. The next day, May 15, 1990, Lev Zaikov, the Politburo member for the military-industrial complex, sent a typewritten letter to Gorbachev and Shevardnadze. Although Gorbachev’s role in the biological weapons program is not clear up to this point, the Zaikov letter shows that he was informed of some details on this date.

Document 6 – The Zaikov letter to Gorbachev. In this important memo, which he wrote at Gorbachev’s request, Zaikov puts a very selective spin on the history and activities of the Soviet germ warfare program. It is evident from the letter that Soviet officials lied not only to the world, but to each other, including the president of the country.
[Source: Hoover Institution Library and Archives, Katayev collection]

For more analysis of the letter, see The Dead Hand, pp. 346-348.

Two days later, U.S. Secretary of State James A. Baker III was invited to join Shevardnadze on a sightseeing trip to Zagorsk, a town forty-three miles northeast of the Kremlin with a famous Russian Orthodox monastery. Baker had prepared a short paper outlining what the United States knew.

As they cruised to Zagorsk in Shevardnadze’s ZIL limousine, flying Soviet and American flags on the front, with no aides but two interpreters in the car, Baker raised the issue of biological weapons and handed the paper to Shevardnadze. Baker recalled that Shevardnadze said, in the present tense, “he didn’t think it could be so, but he would check it out.”

The issue of biological weapons came up again at the Washington summit. On Saturday, June 2, 1990, President Bush and Gorbachev had a private discussion about it at Camp David.

And in July 1990, Baker gave Shevardnadze yet another paper outlining American concerns about biological weapons.

Shevardnadze was scheduled to meet Baker in August at Lake Baikal. On July 27 and again on July 30, 1990, a group of officials gathered at Zaikov’s office in Moscow to draft the talking points that Shevardnadze would use to respond to Baker.

Document 7 and Document 8: Shevardnadze’s talking points for Baker on Aug. 1, 1990.  Shevardnadze essentially continues the cover-up. He says, “We have no biological weapons.” Document 7 is a draft, and Document 8 consists of Shevardnadze’s actual talking points.  In his memoirs, Shevardnadze alluded to this moment: “If anything, Jim could have had some doubts about my honesty, in connection with an unpleasant story I do not intend to tell here.” He added, “Lying is always unproductive.”
[Source: Hoover Institution Library and Archives, Katayev collection]

The Shevardnadze response was followed by a long negotiation which resulted in the first U.K.-U.S. visits to the Soviet biological weapons complex in January, 1991. But the Western experts who visited came away with even deeper suspicions that a massive germ warfare program existed.

The stonewalling would continue even after the demise of the Soviet Union in December 1991.

For more, see The Dead Hand.

CONFIDENTIAL: BULGARIA RECOVERS FROM NURSES’ RETURN



VZCZCXRO5998
RR RUEHTRO
DE RUEHSF #0981 2211411
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 091411Z AUG 07
FM AMEMBASSY SOFIA
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 4127
INFO RUEHTRO/AMEMBASSY TRIPOLI
RUEHFR/AMEMBASSY PARIS 0265
UNCLAS SOFIA 000981 
 
SIPDIS 
 
SIPDIS 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: PGOV PREL LY BU
SUBJECT: BULGARIA RECOVERS FROM NURSES' RETURN 
 
Ref: Sofia 924 
 
1. On August 2, the GOB approved forgiving USD 56.635 million of communist-era debt owed by Libya. This debt forgiveness was Bulgaria's contribution to the deal brokered by the EU for Libya to release five Bulgarian nurses and a Palestinian doctor. Whatever else may be murky in the deal, Bulgaria's debt forgiveness is both public and completed.
 
2. Since the nurses' July 24 return home, Bulgarian government and society have been working to reintegrate them into a country that has substantially changed over eight years. The Palestinian doctor, who announced he wishes to remain in Bulgaria, has also been warmly welcomed. After their return the nurses spent two weeks at the government's VIP residential compound outside Sofia. The GOB promised to find all the medics jobs, and a number of hospitals have offered positions. The GOB gave each medic 10,000 leva (USD 7,000), is covering their medical bills (two of the nurses needed unspecified surgery), and covered pension and medical insurance payments for the past eight years. Phone company MTEL is providing each with an apartment and cell phone, a local newspaper owner gave each another 10,000 leva, and a local construction company is renovating one nurse's rural house. Two nurses have been provided with hotel rooms in Bulgaria's premier ski resort as they readjust to life in Bulgaria. Sofia's mayor offered to pay for language classes and to help the Palestinian doctor settle in Sofia.
 
3. Although a few groups complained the nurses were getting more than ordinary citizens facing economic problems, the aftermath of the medics' return has seen surprisingly little rancor and recrimination. Bulgaria has, for the most part, moved on. When one nurse's son demanded 100,000 euros from the GOB as compensation for its failure to free the medics, the medics themselves announced they had no claim on the government. Most Bulgarian press, always eager to jump at a scandal, have stated the GOB did what it could. The only scandals have been minor blips in the press, caused by France's Avocats sans Frontieres (ASF). International press quoted ASF lawyer Stephane Zerbib as claiming the medics were being held prisoner in the presidential residence and would seek political asylum in France. Another ASF lawyer, Emmanuel Altit, reportedly arrived in Sofia shortly after the medics and tried to persuade them to sue the GOB. The medics deny any intent to seek asylum abroad or sue the GOB. The Palestinian doctor is apparently seeking to take Libya to court on torture charges, but this is unlikely to be a hot button issue here.
 
4. All in all, jubilation at the nurses' return has segued to near matter-of-fact normalcy. If the nurses speak out about their experience, that could change. For now, the mood is one of relief and recuperation.
 
KARAGIANNIS

CONFIDENTIAL – KUALALUMPUR765, ANWAR SWORN IN AT PARLIAMENT

VZCZCXRO0460
PP RUEHCHI RUEHDT RUEHHM RUEHNH
DE RUEHKL #0765/01 2410943
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
P 280943Z AUG 08
FM AMEMBASSY KUALA LUMPUR
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 1550
INFO RUCNASE/ASEAN MEMBER COLLECTIVE
RUEHBJ/AMEMBASSY BEIJING 2489
RUEHKO/AMEMBASSY TOKYO 2564
RHHMUNA/USCINCPAC HONOLULU HI
RHEHNSC/NSC WASHDC
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 KUALA LUMPUR 000765 

SIPDIS 

DEPT FOR EAP/MTS 

E.O. 12958: DECL: 08/28/2018
TAGS: PGOV PHUM PINR KDEM MY
SUBJECT: ANWAR SWORN IN AT PARLIAMENT 

REF: A. KL 759 ANWAR WINS RESOUNDING VICTORY
     B. KL 753 INDICATORS ALL POINT TO ANWAR VICTORY
     C. KL 743 GOM PLAYING HARDBALL 

Classified By: ACTING POLITICAL SECTION CHIEF W. GARY GRAY, REASON 1.4
(B AND
 D). 

1. (C) Summary.  Anwar Ibrahim, still savoring his landslide
by-election victory, was sworn into Parliament on August 28
after being officially confirmed as leader of the Pakatan
Rakyat (PR) opposition alliance.  His first intervention was
to question the merits of  the DNA identification bill which
the ruling coalition planned to pass later that day.  Some
key Anwar aides seemed to be hedging on their leader,s
stated pledge to oust the Government by September 16 and
neutral observers were even more skeptical, but most agreed
that Anwar is now enjoying a surge of  momentum.   A suddenly
more assertive mainstream media is portraying  the BN as
mired in old thinking and old methods, in contrast to the
more cutting edge tactics effectively employed by the
opposition in Permatang Pauh.  End Summary. 

2.  (C) Parliament was the center of attention on August 28
as Anwar Ibrahim, followed by a large media entourage,
entered to be sworn in by Speaker Pandikar Amin Mulia at the
beginning of the session.  The Speaker also formally
announced that the PR parties had unanimously selected Anwar
as Opposition Leader in Parliament.  Star newspaper chief
editor Wong Chun Wai, (recalling a conversation with  PM
Abdullah a few days before) told Poloffs that PM Abdullah
himself had overruled underlings who wanted to delay Anwar,s
entry into Parliament and ordered that the newly-elected MP
be sworn in as soon as possible.  Anwar, again mobbed by
reporters upon re-emerging from the chamber, chided the BN
for spending "billions" in Permatang Pauh but failing to win
over voters with its negative race-based campaign.  Having
harshly criticized the media over the past several weeks,
Anwar told the assembled journalists that he knew "your
hearts were in the right place even though you have to write
what your bosses order."  In that regard, state-owned RTM
(Radio-Television Malaysia), which normally broadcasts the
first 30 minutes of every Parliament session, began its
coverage only after Anwar,s swearing in. 

3. (C) The mainstream media, with the notable exception of
Malay language publications, has exhibited uncharacteristic
boldness in the wake of the by-election, with a number of
articles sharply critical of the BN,s campaign in Permatang
Pauh and expressing grudging admiration for the opposition
alliance,s operation.  Star editor Wong told us he had
resisted pressure to downplay Anwar,s triumph and insisted
on reporting it in banner headlines.  Such  openings have
appeared in the past only to be slammed shut, and the GOM
sent a message on August 27 by ordering all 21 Internet
Service Providers (ISPs) in the country to  block access to
Rajah Petra,s controversial  Malaysia Today website
((www.Malaysia-Today.net).   The site remains accessible,
however, through an alternate link.  Raja Petra charged that
the GOM had breached its own commitment not to censor the
internet during the promotion of Malaysia,s own version of
Silicon Valley, the Multimedia Super Corridor. 

4.  (C) While Anwar held court outside, in the chamber
opposition MPs voiced their objections to the DNA
identification bill, which Home Affairs Minister Syed Hamid
was pushing to pass by the end of the day.  Anwar himself
returned to make his first intervention, questioning the
Government,s motives for trying to rush through the bill,
widely seen as targeted at Anwar's own ongoing sodomy case
(Ref C).  Opposition MPs acknowledged to us that they had no
hope of delaying the legislation and expected it to pass, but
as noted (Ref A), the bill must pass through the upper house,
not scheduled to meet until December 1, before becoming law. 

5.  (C) Anwar,s Political Secretary Sim Tze Min and PKR
electoral chief Saifuddin Nasution  told Poloffs that the
opposition plan to achieve a majority in Parliament by
September 16 remains "on" but others, including PKR Vice
President Azmin Ali  were more cautious, noting "we,ll see."
 More detached observers remain highly skeptical of Anwar,s
ability to meet his self-proclaimed deadline, but do not
deny, given his present momentum, that the opposition leader
could eventually prevail.  Saiffudin maintained that  Anwar
is now clearly winning the electoral game, but what remains
is winning over the critical institutions, especially the
police and the military.  He claimed, however, that  compared
to ten years ago, Anwar and the opposition are in far better
shape in this regard to having, won over a number supporters
within the various key state institutions.  He acknowledged
that the Police Special Branch was especially critical in
this regard, expressing the hope that SB personnel, better
than anyone else, knew which way the political winds were
blowing and would want to emerge on the winning side or at
least hedge their bets. 

6.  (C) Our PKR interlocutors continued to exhibit  some
nervousness about PAS's reliability as a coalition partner.
While gratified with what they saw as a sterling PAS
performance in supporting Anwar in Permatang Pauh, they worry
that elements within PAS, especially its youth wing, will
continue to issue extreme  pronouncements that alienate other
coalition partners.  They also concede that any new balance
of power resulting from MPs crossing over to Anwar,s side
must include sufficient numbers of Malay/Muslims to avoid
alienating PAS.   In addition to the fragility of the PR, of
course the next serious obstacle for Anwar is his upcoming
sodomy trial.   GOM sources continue to suggest that  they
have what they see as some sort of convincing  evidence up
their sleeve.  This presumably would be revealed  upon the
beginning of the trial, the date of which will be determined
when the court reconvenes on September 10. 

KEITH

The Washington/Camp David Summit 1990: From the Secret Soviet, American and German Files

Bush and Gorbachev in the Red Room of the White House, June 1, 1990.

Washington, D.C., June 13, 2010 – The Washington summit 20 years ago this month between Presidents George H.W. Bush and Mikhail S. Gorbachev brought dramatic realization on the American side of the severe domestic political pressures facing the Soviet leader, produced an agreement in principle on trade but no breakthrough on Germany, and only slow progress towards the arms race in reverse which Gorbachev had offered, according to previously secret Soviet and U.S. documents posted today by the National Security Archive.

The largely symbolic achievements of the Washington summit memorialized in the documents contrast with subsequent published accounts claiming that the summit was a crucial turning point for German unification. (Note 1) The documents suggest other (non-American) points were more important, such as the March 1990 elections in East Germany, and the July 1990 meeting between Gorbachev and West German chancellor Helmut Kohl, in which Kohl offered significant financial aid and support for the Soviet troops in East Germany during a multi-year withdrawal process. (Note 2)

The documents show that Gorbachev came to the Washington summit in May 1990 under severe constraints from his own Central Committee (in marked contrast to previous summits). His marching orders, published here for the first time, reflect the dismay within leading Soviet circles over the loss of the Eastern European empire, resistance to Gorbachev’s demilitarization policy, and opposition to the unification of Germany.

Retrenchment on the Soviet side found something of an echo on the U.S. side, as a combination of the U.S. Air Force desire for thousands of air-launched cruise missiles (conventional warheads only, but the Soviets saw the possibility of nuclear conversion in a crunch), and U.S. Navy resistance to on-site inspections for mutual verification on ship-board nuclear warheads, prevented real progress on major arms cuts proposals such as the 50% ballistic missile cut discussed by Gorbachev and President Reagan at Reykjavik four years earlier. In fact, completing the START treaty – which Gorbachev originally sought to sign at the Washington summit – would take an entire additional year.

The documents show that Gorbachev came to Washington determined to make one final push for his idea of a European security structure, or the “common European home.”  He envisioned a gradual transformation of NATO and the Warsaw Pact into political organizations and their subsequent dissolution as the Conference on Security and Cooperation in Europe (CSCE) would become institutionalized and subsume NATO security functions. For Gorbachev, this was the answer to Soviet Union’s pressing issues—modernization and integration into Europe. At the same time, the Soviet leader was not going to alienate Germany as a potential friend and donor by opposing German unification—even in NATO if other alternatives did not work.

This situation created a strange dichotomy, where Gorbachev showed surprising flexibility on the issue of German unification—proposing, in fact, that Germany should be allowed to choose alliances herself, but at the same time he wanted to slow down the pace of unification to let the European processes come first. At the Washington summit, Gorbachev says that he would prefer to see “united Germany as the mediator of the European process,” that his preferred model of unification would be “a model that would include some length of time and be synchronized with the European processes.” The documents show Gorbachev being painfully aware of the reverse connection between German unification and the European process—fast unification would negate his vision of the common European home. Although Baker for the first time states that the United States now accepts the idea of building European security structures, and the Americans would go on to lead a NATO summit focused on altering alliance policy in ways that would help Gorbachev, here Bush emphasizes that “unification is unfolding faster than any of us could have imagined,” and that “united Germany is right around the corner.”

In his conversations with Bush, perhaps for the first time in the history of U.S.-Soviet summits, the Soviet leader talks about his parliament almost as much as his American counterpart—and in a similar fashion as well.  Partly, Gorbachev sincerely admits that political pressures from the Supreme Soviet do impose severe limits on his freedom of maneuver on most of the issues of the negotiations, but also he uses this issue as leverage with the U.S. President. However, especially on the issue of the Lithuanian drive for independence, Gorbachev is truly under fire from the left and from the right in the Supreme Soviet. He also badly needs to show the summit as his success, which domestically would hinge on signing the trade agreement, securing Western credits, and a fast signing of START. The transcripts show that Gorbachev repeatedly addresses the looming economic crisis in the Soviet Union and the need for support of the Soviet reform by the West.

The two leaders’ very first one-on-one discussion on May 31 (according to the memoirs, but unfortunately largely missing from the available documentary record) spends significant time on economic reform in the Soviet Union, and requests for assistance. During that discussion, the Soviet leader asks his American counterpart what kind of Soviet Union would the U.S. want to see in the future. He in turn emphasizes that the new Soviet Union would be a democratic, open and stable state with market economy, but that change would have to come gradually. Gorbachev finds Bush very sympathetic regarding Soviet domestic problems but unable to deliver what he wants most—credits to support investment and purchase consumer goods. Instead, Bush goes ahead with the trade agreement, despite political criticism over the Lithuania issue, to make sure Gorbachev has at least one success to point to. After the trade agreement is signed, the Camp David discussions feature a true tour d’horizon of the regional issues and show a genuine cooperation between the Soviet and American leaders.

The documents posted today include Soviet memcons of the Washington summit itself (the American memcons remain classified today, in a surreal testimony to the decrepitude of the U.S. secrecy system), the preparatory documents from both Soviet and U.S. files for the preceding ministerial meeting in Moscow between Secretary of State James Baker and Soviet foreign minister Eduard Shevardnadze (and Gorbachev), the National Security Directive signed by George H.W. Bush defining the American arms control goals and limits, the transcript of Kohl’s call to Bush just before the summit on May 30, 1990, and the U.S. Embassy cables from Moscow about Gorbachev’s political crisis before the summit and Soviet reaction afterwards, including the observation that the summit played in Moscow as if it were a political campaign against insurgent Russian politician Boris Yeltsin.

 


Read the Documents

Document 1. “Gorbachev Confronts Crisis of Power,” Moscow 15714, Cable from U.S. Embassy Moscow to U.S. Department of State, 11 May 1990.

This remarkable cable from U.S. Ambassador Jack Matlock in Moscow just weeks before the Washington summit describes for the summit planners in Washington the severe “crisis of political power” facing Gorbachev, who seems “less a man in control and more an embattled leader.” The cable details the many signs of crisis, which is “of Gorbachev’s making, if not of his design” because “[f]ive years of Gorbachev’s perestroika have undermined the key institution of political power in the Soviet Union, the Communist Party” without replacing it with any coherent, legitimate governance system. Full of specifics about “the powerful social forces his reforms have unleashed” and prescient about the various possibilities to come, the Matlock cable implicitly signals that Gorbachev would be coming to Washington on the downward curve of his power and his ability to deliver any of the items on the American agenda. In effect, the arms race in reverse that had been on offer from Gorbachev at the previous summits with Presidents Reagan and Bush now would be slowed to a crawl.

Document 2. “Draft U.S.-Soviet Summit Joint Statement,” U.S. Department of State, R.G.H. Seitz to the Secretary, 14 May 1990.

The State Department prepared this CONFIDENTIAL nine-page script two weeks before the Washington summit, summarizing what the U.S. government expected from the meeting, in prose that reads preemptively in the past tense. The cover memo from the Assistant Secretary of State for European Affairs, Raymond Seitz, proposes giving the draft to the Soviets at the very beginning of Secretary Baker’s ministerial meeting in Moscow, or alternatively waiting to “gauge the tone of the ministerial” and “adjust[ing] our draft accordingly before handing it over.” Notable are the passages that propose, related to START and to CFE, that “all major substantive issues have been resolved” yet kick the can for completing these agreements until “the end of 1990” (for START, this moment would not come until July 1991). Also interesting is the absence of any mention of NATO, at a time when a unified Germany’s prospective membership in that alliance was at the center of the political debate (and of the Americans’ concerns); and instead, the draft emphasizes the CSCE processes that most appealed to Gorbachev’s vision of a common European home.

Document 3. National Security Directive 40, “Decisions on START Issues,” 14 May 1990.

The language in this SECRET five-page Directive signed by President Bush takes the reader back to the intricacies of Cold War arms control negotiations between the superpowers, with a profusion of acronyms, subceilings, devilish details, and not-so-hidden agendas. The story behind the very first item on the list, the non-nuclear air-launched cruise missile Tacit Rainbow, reveals the real reason why it took so long to complete the START treaty (it wouldn’t be signed until July 1991). Tacit Rainbow, at the time of this Directive still in development and not yet in production, was intended to be a jet-powered mini-drone that could hover over enemy targets (assuming massive air attacks were on their way), wait for enemy radar to light up, then destroy those air-defense radars. This system would be cancelled in 1991 before even entering production in part because of cost overruns and also because of audit findings that decoys would be more effective against ground radars. Yet the hard line taken by U.S. START negotiators attempting to leave open this kind of U.S. option for developing non-nuclear cruise missiles added years of delay on overall cuts in strategic weapons. Likewise, the language on submarine-launched cruise missiles – allowing 875-1000 of them to be deployed without any on-board verification procedures – was more the product of U.S. military service rivalries for new weapons systems than any real assessment of U.S. national security. After all, many more U.S. cities were on the coasts and thus vulnerable to Soviet SLCMs than were Soviet cities vulnerable to U.S. SLCMs – a zero option would have made the U.S. more secure.

Document 4. Central Committee of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union, “On the directives for negotiations with the U.S. Secretary of State James Baker in Moscow on May 16-19th, 1990,” 16 May 1990.

This package of Soviet documents from Gorbachev Foundation files includes the Politburo’s approval of what are in effect marching orders for Gorbachev’s and Shevardnadze’s dealings with the Americans up to and including the Washington-Camp David summit, starting with Secretary Baker’s ministerial visit to Moscow. The tone-setting document is the May 15th memo from six senior officials including Shevardnadze of the Foreign Ministry, Zaikov from the military-industrial complex, Kryuchkov from the KGB, Yakovlev (in charge of ideology), and Yazov from the Defense Ministry. This memo declares that “[t]he main task is to prepare the principle provisions of a Soviet-American treaty on a 50-percent reduction in strategic offensive weapons, to be coordinated during the summit” and the following specific directives even expect the agreement “to be initialed by the USSR and US leaders during the meeting…” But on Germany, the memo includes the position that the Soviets had already presented at the Two Plus Four negotiations in Paris, that “it would be politically and psychologically unacceptable for us to see a united Germany in NATO. We cannot agree to the destruction of the balance of power and stability in Europe that would inevitably result from this step.” Top Gorbachev adviser Anatoly Chernyaev had earlier in May debated this position with Gorbachev, who well understood that it could not be sustained, yet this was Gorbachev’s official brief as he went into the summit. As the further documents show, he would seriously exceed his brief in Washington; yet the memo gives the sense of limits and domestic political pressure under which Gorbachev was operating. Combined with the directives that follow, the memo clearly attempts to limit the possibility of any further Gorbachev concessions during the negotiations, and details very specific positions on each of the contentious issues to be covered. Interestingly, the specific instructions include a paragraph on biological weapons—the only indication we have in the documents that this subject becomes an important part of discussion at the summit, taken up directly by Gorbachev with Bush at Camp David, according to David Hoffman’s account in The Dead Hand.

Document 5. Record of conversation, M.S. Gorbachev and U.S. Secretary of State J. Baker (with delegations), Moscow, 18 May 1990 [excerpts].

The fascinating excerpt presented here covers the arms control portion of the Gorbachev-Baker conversation, in preparation for the Washington summit, while the full text of this memcon includes extensive but inconclusive discussion of the issues of German unification and of tensions in the Baltics, particularly the standoff between Moscow and secessionist Lithuania. Following the official directives, Soviet negotiators are trying to avoid making further concessions while agreeing with the U.S. insistence on making an exception for Tacit Rainbow missile, which exceeds the Soviet-sought range limit on cruise missiles, and by accepting – after some debate – the U.S. demand that the issue of inspection of SLCMs on naval ships be resolved by a separate non-binding political statement and not be part of the treaty. Here we find the Soviet leader channeling President Ronald Reagan’s famous proverb, “trust but verify,” while the Americans duck any verification measures. Baker even rejects Gorbachev’s proposal for what would be purely symbolic inspections of “two ships a year,” something that would help Gorbachev with his domestic critics. When Gorbachev retorts, “does your position consist of the condition that an alien foot should never be able to step on an American ship?”, Baker finally admits, “We, of course, would prefer precisely this solution. We do not want to start movement on this slippery road.” Gorbachev’s frustration is evident when he points to the START “concession that the American side did not even anticipate. I am talking about the agreement to cut the number of our heavy missiles by half.  We agreed to that in Reykjavik.  Compared to that, American concessions are just sunflower seeds.” For his part, Shevardnadze laments that “two days will not be enough to list all our concessions” during the recent negotiations. For perhaps the first time in such negotiations, the Soviets match the U.S. concern for how the Congress will view the treaty in ratification debates with their own references to the Supreme Soviet’s consideration – perhaps reflecting the new opposition groups from right and left in that body.

Document 6. Talking Points, Secretary Baker’s Briefing to Members of the White House Press Corps, 22 May 1990.

Back from Moscow, the Secretary of State appears in the White House press briefing room to set the stage for the summit, outline the issues, and shape the press coverage going forward.  The cover memo from Baker’s senior aide, Assistant Secretary for Public Affairs Margaret Tutwiler, gives Baker the scenario and the 30-minute time limit for the briefing. The Talking Points in outline format express cautious hopes for completing the START treaty (“In Malta the Presidents set a goal of resolving all major substantive START issues by the summit. Progress at the Moscow ministerial has certainly put them in a position where that is possible.”). At the very end is the summary of the potential trade agreement that would become the primary (although primarily symbolic) outcome of the summit.

Document 7. “Press Fact Sheets for the Summit,” U.S. Department of State to Brent Scowcroft, The White House, 28 May 1990.

This 28-page set of CONFIDENTIAL drafts provided by the State Department to the White House gives one-page summaries of each of the agreements expected at the summit, together with those “that could be signed or announced if political decision made” and those “not yet fully negotiated” – the latter including START as well as “Bering Sea Fisheries.” The package gives a detailed sense of what kept both countries’ bureaucracies busy before and during the superpower summits.  Even though ultimately intended to turn into public press statements, these drafts contain some insider insights, including in the cover memo reporting that “[i]n cases where texts are still being negotiated with the Soviets, we have tried to predict the result and drafted the fact sheets on that basis.”

Document 8. “Status Update on Agreements and Joint Statements for the Summit,” U.S. Department of State to Brent Scowcroft, The White House, 29 May 1990.

This memo from the State Department to the White House updates where each of the proposed agreements stand, with candid language about each, including the fact that emigration legislation is unlikely to pass in Moscow before the summit – which was one of the original U.S. conditions for a new trade agreement. For the uninitiated, the memo helpfully explains that “agreement texts must be conformed (U.S. and Soviet sides agree the English and Russian texts are the same) and then certified (State interpreter confirms the final texts are identical) before signature.”

Document 9. “Telephone Call from Chancellor Helmut Kohl of the Federal Republic of Germany,” Memorandum of Telephone Conversation [with President Bush], The White House, 30 May 1990.

The West German chancellor rings President Bush to make three points before Gorbachev arrives in Washington for the summit. First was the joint Kohl-Bush position on the “future membership of a united Germany in NATO without any limitations.” Second was Kohl’s intention to “find an sensible economic arrangement” with Gorbachev because he “needs help very much” – meaning major West German financial aid and credits. Third, “it is of immense importance that we make further progress in disarmament.”  Interestingly, in the Bush-Scowcroft version of this conversation that would be published in their joint memoir, A World Transformed, Kohl’s third point about disarmament is left out altogether (p. 278). And the memcon is circumspect on Bush’s side about Gorbachev’s need for financial aid, with Bush saying only that he “remember[s] your private conversation with me.  Subsequently, that has been raised, with Jim Baker. We have problems with that, related to Lithuania.” The U.S. was also running its own budget deficit, and Bush had no intention of providing major financial support to Gorbachev – that would be up to Kohl.

Document 10. Record of Conversation, M.S. Gorbachev and G. Bush, Washington D.C., The White House, 31 May 1990 [First One-on-One, Excerpt].

The documentary record of the first one-on-one (actually with translators) meeting in the Oval Office between the U.S. and Soviet leaders remains incomplete, since the Gorbachev Foundation has only published the two pages of excerpts translated here, and the American memcons of the entire summit remain ridiculously classified, even though President Bush published lengthy quotations from them in his 1998 memoir co-authored with Brent Scowcroft. Bush’s memoir (p. 279) describes this discussion as “largely philosophical, the kind each of us had hoped to have at Malta.” This first conversation of the summit went significantly longer than planned, forcing the cancellation of the first plenary session, but the tone between the leaders is striking, direct and candid. They assure each other of their commitment to cooperation and further arms control negotiations. Bush draws Gorbachev’s attention to the situation in Lithuania and how difficult it is for him politically to sustain the position of supporting perestroika while Moscow is putting pressure on Lithuania to stay in the Soviet Union.  Bush says he will try to continue to show patience, but he mentions that the Lithuanian opposition leaders were comparing him to Chamberlain, the appeaser of Hitler, “for supporting you [Gorbachev] and not the great American principles of democracy and freedom.”

Document 11. Record of Conversation, M.S. Gorbachev and G. Bush, Washington D.C., The White House, 31 May 1990 [Plenary with delegations, Excerpts].

In this famous “two anchor” discussion, the U.S. and Soviet delegations discuss the process of German unification and especially the issue of united Germany joining NATO.  Bush is trying to persuade his Russian counterpart to reconsider his fears of Germany based on the past, and encourage him to trust the new democratic Germany. Baker repeats the nine assurances, a package of various American pledges put together for maximum impact, including the one that the United States now agrees to support the pan-European process and transformation of NATO to remove the Soviet perception of threat. Gorbachev’s preferred position is Germany with one foot in both NATO and the Warsaw Pact—the “two anchors”—in some kind of associated membership, which Bush calls “schizophrenic.” After the U.S. President frames the issue in the context of the Helsinki agreement, Gorbachev proposes the formulation that German people would have the right to choose their alliance—which he in essence already affirmed to Kohl during their meeting in February 1990. In stating and then reaffirming this position, Gorbachev significantly exceeds his brief and incurs the ire of other members of delegation, especially the Soviet official with the German portfolio, Valentin Falin, and Marshal Sergey Akhromeev. On the future of NATO itself, the Soviet leader suggests that if NATO becomes “a genuinely open organization,” then the Soviet Union “could also think about becoming a member of NATO”—surprisingly, he already suggested it to Vaclav Havel on May 21, during the Czechoslovak president’s visit to Moscow. The key warning about the future comes in Gorbachev’s caution that “if the Soviet people get an impression that we are disregarded in the German question, then all the positive processes in Europe, including the negotiations in Vienna [over conventional forces] would be in serious danger. This is not just bluffing. It is simply that the people will force us to stop and to look around.” This is a remarkable admission about domestic political pressures, from the last Soviet leader.

Document 12. Record of Conversation, M.S. Gorbachev and G. Bush, Washington D.C., The White House, 1 June 1990 [Excerpts from One-on-One and from the Plenary with delegations].

These brief excerpts published by the Gorbachev Foundation are translated here for the first time. After showing flexibility on German unification during the previous day’s discussions, the Soviet leader is trying here to achieve his major political goal—to get Bush to agree to sign a trade agreement with the Soviet Union in the absence of the expected law on emigration. Gorbachev explains how important for him this agreement would be and asks the U.S. President for a “political gesture” in the one-on-one conversation. In the plenary portion of the talks on strategic arms control, Gorbachev states his ultimate goal—“we have a firm intention to reach a signing of this treaty already in this year. This is the most important [thing].” But no breakthroughs on either issue are reached until later in the day when Bush decides to sign a trade agreement by finessing the emigration law requirement and adding a secret codicil requiring the USSR to suspend its blockage of Lithuania and begin serious dialogue.

Document 13. Record of Conversation, M.S. Gorbachev and G. Bush, Camp David, Maryland, 2 June 1990 [Excerpts from Camp David discussions].

The only publicly available excerpt, published by the Gorbachev Foundation, shows Gorbachev thanking Bush for agreeing to sign the trade agreement. The Soviet leader is satisfied with this outcome that gives him a victory to take home, to allay the criticism of the conservatives, and at least symbolically to address the economic crisis at home. He is also very sensitive to the public assessment of the summit and wants to pronounce it a victory.  Bush and Gorbachev together discuss what they would say at the press conference the next day, especially on reaching the trade agreement. What the excerpt leaves out is the discussion on biological weapons that took place during Gorbachev’s visit to Camp David, during which Bush confronted Gorbachev with information that the U.S. received from their British partners after the defection of Soviet biological weapons expert Pasechnik in the fall of 1989. Only two weeks earlier, on May 14, the British and American ambassadors to Moscow, Rodric Braithwaite and Jack Matlock, had presented a demarche on biological weapons to the Soviets, according to David Hoffman’s pioneering research.

Document 14. “Washington Summit Briefing Points,” U.S. Department of State to Deputy Secretary [Lawrence] Eagleburger, 4 June 1990.

Immediately following the summit, the State Department sends these SECRET talking points to the Deputy Secretary, Lawrence Eagleburger, away from Washington in Paraguay. The cable notes that separate (and presumably more expansive) Presidential letters are being sent to U.S. embassies in NATO countries as well as in Warsaw, Prague, Berlin and Budapest. Here we see the basis for subsequent accounts claiming that the meeting “was essentially different from any previous U.S.-Soviet summit” – “beyond containment to an era of enduring cooperation.”

Document 15. “Soviet Reactions to the Summit,” U.S. Embassy Moscow to U.S. Department of State, Moscow 19444, 12 June 1990.

This remarkable summary of Soviet assessments of the summit points out that “for the average Soviet, the summit story could not compete with concerns over food supplies and the election of Yeltsin to the RFSFR [Russian republic] presidency.” The cable goes on to remark, “From here, especially judging from the television coverage, the summit seemed part of a Gorbachev political campaign to gain support at home.” Bizarrely, the entire section headlined “Dissenting Voices” – giving a “more jaundiced view of the summit” – is blacked out by State Department declassification officers, claiming “B1” which means damage to U.S. national security.

Document 16. “Briefing Allies on Washington Summit,” U.S. Department of State to U.S. Embassies in NATO Capitals, Tokyo, Seoul, Canberra [and info to Moscow], 15 June 1990.

This 13-page cable two weeks after the summit provides the Bush administration’s fullest version of the summit results in the form of briefing points for U.S. diplomats to deliver to the allies. Classified SECRET (or one level up from the CONFIDENTIAL version sent to all diplomatic posts), this briefer includes several additional paragraphs of description just for the allies, as well as quotes from the “candid” exchanges with Gorbachev. For example, the cable quotes Gorbachev as saying were it not for the development of close working relations with Washington, the “rapid pace of change in Europe could have provoked a real clash of interests between the two countries, like “putting a match to a bonfire.”

 


Notes

1. Citing an interview with Anatoly Chernyaev by the scholar Hannes Adomeit, Philip Zelikow and Condoleezza Rice call the summit “a turning point. From this time on, Gorbachev never again voiced adamant opposition to Germany’s presence in NATO.” Zelikow and Rice, Germany Unified and Europe Transformed: A Study in Statecraft (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1995), p. 283. Robert Hutchings goes even further, catching the reader’s attention early in his narrative by writing, “The Bush-Gorbachev Summit thus emerged as the most important U.S.-Soviet meeting ever held. It was a summit essentially unlike any that had gone before.” Yet Hutchings is too scrupulous a scholar to sustain this argument, and by the end of this section he consigns the Washington summit, along with its trade agreement and the London NATO summit, to the status of “essential backdrop for the dramatic meeting in the Caucasus between Kohl and Gorbachev.”  Robert Hutchings, American Diplomacy and the End of the Cold War: An Insider’s Account of U.S. Policy in Europe, 1989-1992 (Washington, D.C.: Woodrow Wilson Center Press, 1997), pp. 131-137.

2. The best recent explication of these dynamics, based in significant part on the National Security Archive’s collections, may be found in Mary Elise Sarotte, 1989: The Struggle to Create Post-Cold War Europe (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 2009), see specifically pp. 167-169 on the Washington summit. For the long view of Gorbachev’s vision for Europe, see Svetlana Savranskaya, “The Logic of 1989,” in Savranskaya, Blanton, and Zubok, eds., Masterpieces of History: The Peaceful End of the Cold War in Europe, 1989 (Budapest/New York: Central European University Press, 2010), pp. 1-47.

Eight Federal Agencies Have FOIA Requests a Decade Old, According to Knight Open Government Survey

Washington, D.C., July 25, 2011 – Forty-five years after President Johnson signed the U.S. Freedom of Information Act into law in 1966, federal agency backlogs of FOIA requests are growing, with the oldest requests at eight agencies dating back over a decade and the single oldest request now 20 years old, according to the Knight Open Government Survey by the National Security Archive at George Washington University (www.nsarchive.org).

The Knight Survey of the oldest requests utilized the FOIA to examine the actual copies of the oldest requests from the 35 federal agencies and components that process more than 90 percent of all FOIAs.  It shows that the oldest requests in the U.S. government were submitted before the fall of the Soviet Union.  These unfulfilled requests – some are for documents that are themselves more than 50 years old – are victims of an endless referral process in which any agency that claims “equity” can censor their release.

The Freedom of Information Act requires agencies to process and respond to a request within 20 business days, with the possibility of a ten-day extension under “unusual circumstances.”  In his March 19, 2009 government-wide memo on FOIA, Attorney General Eric Holder declared that “long delays should not be viewed as an inevitable and insurmountable consequence of high demand.”  Despite this, the Knight Survey shows that some FOIAs remain marooned for decades.

The two previous Knight Open government surveys conducted during the Obama administration have also shown that, despite a clear message from the President, government agencies have been slow to improve their Freedom of Information processes.  The 2010 Knight Survey, “Sunshine and Shadows,” showed that only 13 of 90 agencies implemented concrete changes in response to President Obama and Attorney General Holder’s early memoranda calling for FOIA reforms.  The March 2011 Knight Survey, “Glass Half Full,” showed improvement but still revealed that just 49 of 90 agencies had followed specific tasks mandated by the White House to improve their FOIA performance.  As Eric Newton, senior adviser to the president at the John S. and James L. Knight Foundation, put it, “At this rate, the president’s first term in office will be over by the time federal agencies do what he asked them to do on his first day in office.”

In 2003, concerned with the tremendous age of its outstanding FOIAs, the National Security Archive created the “Ten Oldest FOIA Request” metric to illustrate the quantity of unfulfilled requests held by government agencies.  In 2006, the Department of Justice directed all agencies to include the date of their oldest pending request in their annual FOIA report.  The OPEN Government Act of 2007 codified the requirement that all agencies report their oldest open requests.  Now, under the Obama administration, the public can easily search the “Ten Oldest” statistic for all agencies at FOIA.gov.

But seeing just the dates of the oldest requests –not their subjects or who requested them– does not tell the whole story. To get a fuller illustration of the dire backlog, the National Security Archive requested copies of the actual ten oldest requests from the top 35 agencies or components.

Selected topics of the marooned FOIA requests include:

* A 1993 request to the National Archives for 1943 documents about the Sicilian Mafia and Sicilian Separatist movements.
* A 1995 request to the Air Force for documents relating to Pakistani surface to air missiles.
* A 1995 request to the Reagan Presidential Library for documents about “whether American POWs and MIAs were left in Southeast Asia.”
* A 1998 request to the George H.W. Bush Library for documents pertaining to the 21 December 1988 bombing of Pan Am flight 103.
* A 2000 request to the Kennedy Presidential Library for documents relating to “politics and the Internal Revenue Service.”
* A 2004 request to the Nixon Presidential Library for documents about the nuclear consultation between the United States and United Kingdom before the use of submarine-launched nuclear missiles.
* A 2004 request to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission for documents about Enron’s energy sales to California.
* A 2005 “urgent request” to the Department of Transportation for whistleblower complaints to be used in an upcoming Occupational Safety and Health Administration hearing.
* A 2005 request to the Federal Aviation Administration for information about the tracking information of an airplane which crashed off the Massachusetts coast in December 2005.
* A 2006 request to the Consumer Protection Bureau for documents about the recalled “Polly Pocket Dolls.”
* A 2006 request to the Clinton Presidential Library for documents relating to the US role in the 1994 transfer of power in Haiti.
* A 2009 request to the Johnson Presidential Library for documents related to the 1965 Coup staged by Joseph Mobuto in the Congo.

None of the above requests should have taken years to fulfill; most were for easily identifiable materials that should have been relatively simple to locate.  Several relate to areas of U.S. foreign policy that might include sensitive materials, but the FOIA provides well-established ways to protect truly delicate information, so the extraordinary delays are unjustified.  Finally, several of these requests are for subjects like whistleblowers, consumer protection, and business – issues of obvious social interest, where the government’s duty to be answerable to its citizens would seem to be most apparent.

In addition to identifying the specific subjects of FOIA requests that the government has not responded to, the Knight Survey also serves as a FOIA competency test.  The requests we sent should have been easy to fulfill.  They went to the very FOIA offices that were responsible for inspecting the oldest requests and including them in their federally mandated Annual FOIA reports.  Troublingly, six months after the National Security Archive filed its requests, nine agencies – almost one-quarter of those polled – still have not responded.

Agencies which have not provided documents in response to our request:

* Army
* Central Intelligence Agency
* Department of Energy
* Department of Justice
* Department of State
* Department of Health and Human Services
* Drug Enforcement Administration
* Office of Personnel Management
* Transportation Security Administration

Because of this inexplicable failure to respond, the National Security Archive has taken the unusual step of filing “constructive denial” appeals – which interpret the agencies’ non-response as an effective denial and opens the door to future legal action.

Some agencies are not reporting accurate data to the Justice Department

Perhaps even more disquieting, the Knight Survey also shows frequent discrepancies between the oldest requests agencies have reported to the Department of Justice in the Annual FOIA report and the actual copies of requests provided to us.  Some agencies appear to have outstanding requests years older than what they reported to the Department of Justice.  In the most egregious case, the Defense Intelligence Agency responded to our FOIA request with a document four years older than what it reported to the Department of Justice.

At the heart of the problem – the “referral” process

Each agency examined by the Knight Survey has a backlog older than two years.  Most are substantially older.  Fourteen agencies –more than half– are losing ground on their backlog; their current oldest request is older than it was a year ago.

The key reason for these growing backlogs is the referral process.  Each of the oldest requests held by NARA –including the oldest request in the United States– has been referred to at least one other agency for release.  NARA stores the documents, but cannot declassify them.  It must refer them to any agency which claims partial ownership of, or “equity” in, the information in the records.  This daisy chain of referrals can often result in decades-long delay.  Re-review of the same document by multiple agencies is redundant, costly, and inefficient.  Every FOIA professional is well trained at protecting sensitive material regardless of which agency employs them.  Thus, these bureaucratic “declassification turf wars” do not further protect secrets; they merely impede the public’s access to information.

There is hope that the National Declassification Center, recently on its feet at NARA, will ameliorate this problem for documents housed at the Archives, but it will do nothing to fix the problem of equity and referrals for documents “possessed” by other federal agencies.

Forty five years ago, the birth of the Freedom of Information Act established the profoundly American commitment to open government and access to information.   Yet these decades-old FOIA requests show that US government agencies must do much more –including tackling the problem of equity and referrals– to make that commitment a reality.

45 FOIA News Stories in 2011

“New Prize in Cold War: Cuban Doctors,” The Wall Street Journal, January 15, 2011, Saturday, at A1.

Documents obtained through FOIA by The Wall Street Journal showed that the Cuban Medical Professional Parole immigration program allowed some Cuban doctors and health workers to enter the U.S. as refugees.

“Medicaid pays more, kids get less, audits show,” The Daily News Leader (Staunton, Virginia) January 23, 2011 Sunday, by David Ress/staff.

Documents obtained through a FOIA request identified $14.9 million of questionable payments in 70 insurance providers’ 2008 operations. The state attorney general’s office prosecuted three cases involving more than $4.6 million of fraud. Children were not properly assessed and treated by the qualified staff.

“A murder probe gone awry; Report rips handling of investigation into Riley Fox slaying Chicago Tribune January 25, 2011 Tuesday, at C 7, By Kristen Schorsch, Steve Schmadeke contributed reporting.

A report by a security firm, Andrews International, obtained through a FOIA request of Chicago Tribune showed that Will County Sheriff’s Police made mistakes in Riley Fox murder investigation including mismanagement and “highly questionable evidence. Detectives wrongly pinned Riley’s murder on her father, Kevin Fox. Riley’s parents, Kevin and Melissa Fox, eventually won $8 million in a lawsuit against the sheriff’s office.

“DPS ID system raises concerns” The Detroit News (Michigan) January 27, 2011 Thursday, at A8, by Jennifer Chambers.

The American Civil Liberties Union of Michigan filed a Freedom of Information Act request to the Detroit Public Schools regarding screening system in certain Detroit Public School. The new security system instantly scans driver’s licenses and state ID cards, then cross-checks the information with sex-offender registries in the United States and Canada. The DPS started using this program without parental or school board input.

“Nine judges in region get both salary, pension,” The Journal News (Westchester County, New York) January 30, 2011 Sunday at AWPR1, by Joseph Spector, Sean Lahmanand Jonathan Bandler.

Documents obtained by a FOIA request from the state Comptroller’s Office showed that nine New York judges received double compensation. They collected public pensions and salaries simultaneously. In response, state lawmakers suggested ways for eliminating these legislative loopholes.

“Report finds fraud in AmeriCorps,” Deseret Morning News (Salt Lake City) February 7, 2011 Monday, by Gregory Korte USA Today.

Documents obtained through a FOIA request showed that inspector general for the Corporation for National and Community Service had found several cases of fraud in AmeriCorps, the national service program. In some cases, the alleged fraud involved the misuse of more than $900,000.

“Baxter County sheriff’s deputy fired” The Baxter Bulletin (Mountain Home, Arkansas) February 8, 2011 Tuesday, by Josh Dooley.

According to documents obtained through FOIA, Baxter County sheriff’s deputy, Aaron Brown was fired after a series of incidents which resulted in disciplinary actions against him. Brown was placed on administrative leave a total of three times and was forced to take three weeks of remedial training.

“AP finds few states follow mental health gun law,” The Times of Trenton (New Jersey) February 18, 2011 Friday, at A07, by Greg Bluestein.

According to records obtained by the Associated Press through FOIA, fever that half of US states comply with a post-Virginia Tech shooting law that required them to share the names of mentally ill people with the national background-check system to prevent them from buying guns.

“Conclusions on Yucca lacking” Las Vegas Review-Journal (Nevada), February 18, 2011 Friday, at 8B, by Steve Tetreault.

Documents obtained through a FOIA request showed that The Nuclear Regulatory Commission scientists were evaluating whether tunnels carved in Yucca Mountain could safely hold radioactive particles from decaying nuclear fuel for up to a million years.

“Traffic-pix tix blitz –Stoplight cams nail more than 1M Drivers,” The New York Post February 27, 2011 Sunday, at 2, by Reuven Blau.

FOIA documents obtained by the New York Post showed that for the first time ever, New York City ticketed more than 1 million vehicles for running red lights and getting caught on camera. The city’s 150 secret cameras – 50 were installed in 2009 – nabbed an average of 2,741 drivers a day in 2010.

“FAA Moves to Limit Blockout System Hiding Private Jet Flights,” ProPublica, March 7, 2011, 12:12 p.m.

FOIA documents obtained by ProPublica, showed that The Federal Aviation administration was blocking private flights from real-time tracking data made available to the public. According to the ProPublica investigation, a number of individuals and companies requested the FAA not track their flights after receiving bad publicity. Among them was a televangelist facing a congressional inquiry, governors questioned about personal trips on state planes and Fortune 500 companies that had received government bailouts.

“24 at SEC dealt with over porn Documents show workers at seven regional offices, including Denver’s, were “counseled or disciplined,” The Denver Post, March 9, 2011, Wednesday, at A-01, by Andy Vuong.

According to documents obtained through a FOIA request, twenty-four U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission employees at seven offices, including Denver’s, were counseled or disciplined for accessing pornography sites on government computers.

“Overtime pay climbs. Top earners took in close to 8M in 2010,” Daily News (New York) March 12, 2011 Saturday, at 17, by Adam Lisberg.

Documents obtained by the Daily News through a FOIA request showed that the top 100 overtime earners in city government collectively raked in $7,961,400 in 2010, 6.8% more than in 2009. They were routinely working an extra two to four hours a day, every day – plus working full shifts on Saturdays or Sundays.

“Group warns EPA ready to increase radioactive release guidelines,” The Tennessean (Nashville, Tennessee) March 16, 2011 Wednesday, by, Anne Paine.

The EPA was preparing to increase the standards of permissible radioactive releases in drinking water, food and soil in March, 2011. Documents obtained through FOIA showed that those relaxed standards were opposed by public health professionals inside EPA.

“Wood Dale mayor ran up tab with city; for 2 years, leader repeatedly failed to pay for his health insurance coverage,” Chicago Tribune, March 20, 2011 Sunday, at C7, By Bill Ruthhart.

Records obtained through FOIA showed that from June 2008 until September 2010, Wood Dale Mayor Ken Johnson failed to pay for his health insurance, without informing the City Council. His debt grew as high as $9,283.

“Probe into ethics panel looks at director’s time sheets Newsday (New York) March 31, 2011 Thursday, at A06, by Sandra Peddie.

According to documents obtained through a FOIA request executive director of the Suffolk county Ethics Commission had not worked full time since 2005 and had an arbitration business.

“The Antisocial Network,” Popular Mechanics April 1, 2011, at 58 Vol. 188, by Caren Chesler.

According to documents obtained through FOIA by the Electronic Frontier Foundation, The Internal Revenue Service monitored social media. The Internal revenue Service’s 38-page training manual outlines “Internet tools and searches that will be useful in locating taxpayers and determining their online business activity.”

“TB in elephants called ‘a gray area’; animal-rights group says circus elephant is a danger,” The Baltimore Sun, April 7, 2011 Thursday, at 2A, by Laura Vozzella.

FOIA documents obtained by the People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals showed that  an elephant performing in Baltimore with the Ringling Bros. and Barnum & Bailey Circus  posed a health risk to the public because she has tested positive for tuberculosis.

“New trucking firm, same violations, Logbook problems uncovered during audit of JTL,” Milwaukee Journal Sentinel (Wisconsin) April 17, 2011 Sunday, at D1, by Rick Romell.

According to records obtained through a FOIA request, the trucking firm, Franklin’s JDC Logistics Inc. was fined for logbook violations totaled about $155,000 from 2004 into 2006.

“Hospitals’ overtime overboard; County’s nurses stretched thin, raising risk to patients,” Crain’s Chicago Business, April 18, 2011, at 1 Vol. 34.

FOIA documents obtained by Crain’s Chicago Business and the Better Government Association showed that nearly $40 million a year is routinely spent on overtime pay by Cook County hospitals and health clinics. 182 county health staffers worked more than 624 overtime hours in 2010.

“Special Report: Calhoun County teachers’ pay trails state average,” Battle Creek Enquirer (Michigan) April 18, 2011 Monday, by, Justin A. Hinkley.

According to documents obtained by The Battle Creek Enquirer, the average Calhoun County teacher and the average Calhoun County superintendent were paid below the state average in 2009-10 school year. The average Calhoun County teacher salary was $52,218 in the 2009-10, about 9 percent less than the $57,327 the National Education Association said was the state’s average salary.

“Opponents criticize Tomblin spending; Records show acting governor’s outlays for signage, travel, other items total $64,000,” Charleston Daily Mail (West Virginia) April 19, 2011, Tuesday, at P7A, by Rivarr, Daily Mail Capitol reporter.

According to documents provided by the governor’s office in response to a FOIA request, West Virginia has spent at least $64,000 paying stationery and signage costs as well as travel expenses for acting governor Earl Ray Tomblin, first lady Joanne Tomblin and their security detail.

“Pentagon clears general over profile in magazine,” The New York Times April 19, 2011 Tuesday, at A16, By Thom Shanker; Elisabeth Bumiller contributed reporting.

According to a document obtained by the New York Times through a FOIA request, an inquiry by the Defense Department inspector general into a Rolling Stone Magazine profile of General McChrystal has found no proof of wrongdoing by McChrystal, his military aides or his civilian advisers.

“City defends staff salaries; Citizen suggests cuts are in order,” Mukilteo Beacon (Washington) May 4, 2011, by Sara Bruestle.

Records obtained through a FOIA request showed that Mukilteo, city of about 20,000 had been spending $11 million on salaries and benefits. A majority of the city’s salaried employees and all of the management positions were at or above the maximum of their pay ranges. Six in management were getting paid above their defined ranges.

“Eight lawmakers signed a letter for Renco,” Sunlight Foundation, By Keenan Steiner, May 04 2011

According to documents obtained by the Sunlight Foundation through FOIA, eight members of Congress signed on to a letter asking the heads of the Treasury and State Departments to take measures to intervene on behalf of Renco Group in the middle of a controversial dispute with Peru. Renco Group is owned by billionaire mining magnate Ira Rennert, who has spent more than $300,000 lobbying Washington politicians.

“Lawyer’s career unravels in wake of broken pledges” Arkansas Democrat-Gazette (Little Rock) May 8, 2011 Sunday, at front section, by C.S Murphy.

FOIA documents obtained by Arkansas Democrat-Gazette showed that Former Little Rock attorney Elgin Clemons promised the Arts Center a $500,000 gift from a client, architectural company, Al Abbar. The Arts center faced a financial crisis in the spring of 2010 when the Alabbar donation didn’t materialize.

“Let’s quit fed program that ousts immigrants,” Daily News (New York) May 8, 2011 Sunday, at 34, by Albor Ruiz.

Records obtained through a FOIA request showed that nearly 79% of individuals deported nationally through the Secure Communities program from October 2008 through June 2010 had no criminal record or were arrested for minor offenses.

“Release the Iranian ‘hostages’; Obama’s sanctions against PJAK are unjustified gift to Tehran regime,” The Washington Times May 9, 2011 Monday, at B4, by Kenneth R. Timmerman.

A memorandum obtained by the lawyer of “Free Life Party of Iranian Kurdistan” (PJAK) in response to a FOIA request showed that the Treasury placed PJAK on its list of international terrorists only because the group was allegedly “controlled by the KGK” – another name for the Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK).

“Larcomb says evaluation was late, not signed,” The Marion Star (Marion, Ohio) May 10, 2011 Tuesday, by, Kurt Moore.

Documents obtained through a FOIA request showed that Pleasant Local Schools’ board evaluated its superintendent and put on indefinite paid leave. The documents indicated that the school board perceived the superintendent as “weak.”

“State’s raises for 17 follow frugality talk; Transit unit says duties changed” The Boston Globe May 13, 2011 Friday, at 1, By Noah Bierman.

FOIA documents obtained by the Boston Globe showed that two months after state Transportation Secretary Jeffrey B. Mullan said the economy was too weak to increase salaries for public sector executives he began handing out raises to 17 managers in his department.

“New Study Casts Light On SEC ‘Revolving Door’ Claims,” Dow Jones Business News, May 13, 2011 Friday, By Jessica Holzer.

According to FOIA documents obtained by Project on Government Oversight over the past five years, 219 former the Securities and Exchange Commission employees sought to represent clients on issues before the commission after leaving the agency. The former employees filed 789 notices with the agency on their intent to represent various clients.

“US State Department sued for pipeline lobbyist documents,” Reuters News, May 18, 2011 Wednesday, By Ayesha Rascoe.

A lawsuit was filed by green groups after the State Department denied a FOIA request. Green groups were requesting communications regarding a planned $7 billion TransCanada oil sands pipeline between Paul Elliott, who was national deputy director for Clinton’s 2008 presidential campaign, and the State Department. Groups were seeking the communications which could expose whether Elliott’s ties to Clinton had resulted in bias in the permitting process.

“Des Plaines police officer gets $125,000 in settlement,” Chicago Daily Herald May 18, 2011, Wednesday, C3 Edition, at 3, by Madhu Krishnamurthy

Documents obtained through FOIA showed that Des Plaines paid veteran police Sgt. Matthew Hicks $125,000 to leave the police force and drop all claims of wrongful discharge against the city.

“Oil spill in Greer creek more extensive than thought, DHEC reports,” The Greenville News (South Carolina) May 19, 2011 Thursday, by, Anna Lee Staff Writer.

Records obtained through a FOIA request showed that the spill into a tributary of Frohawk Creek was more extensive than cleanup officials had originally estimated. According to the state Department of Health and Environmental Control, 10,000 gallons spilled. The city engineer and an EPA coordinator first estimated that between 1,000 to 1,500 gallons had leaked.

“Police escorts not limited to dignitaries, records show,” Washington Post May 19, 2011 Thursday, at Metro, B06, by Eric Tucker.

Records obtained by the Associated Press through a FOIA request showed that Washington, D.C. police escorts mostly intended for top government officials and foreign dignitaries have been provided to celebrities, including Charlie Sheen.

“Nursing home abuse, neglect up 33 percent; Government report shows violence, sleeping on the job” Chicago Sun-Times May 21, 2011 Saturday, at 13, by Carla K. Johnson.

FOIA documents obtained by Associated Press showed that across Illinois in 2010, more than 130 cases of abuse and neglect were investigated and confirmed in group homes for adults, a 33 percent increase from 2006.

“What price, jobs? Illinois tax incentive packages growing larger,” Associated Press, May 21, 2011 Saturday, at 1 by David Mercer

Documents obtained through a FOIA request showed that Illinois’ government agreed in 2010 to give $272.7 million in tax breaks and other incentives to 67 companies that had received invitations from other states to move jobs elsewhere.

“Report: Securities and Exchange Commission broke procurement law,” Washington Post.com, May 27, 2011 Saturday, at A16

SEC Inspector General’s report released in response to a FOIA request by Reuters showed that the agency violated procurement law in 2008 when, without proper testing, it spent about $1 million buying computer equipment from Apple. The SEC violated federal regulations by awarding the contract without competitive bidding and by telling Apple its budget in order to tailor its offer precisely to the budgeted amount.

‘Statehouse beat; Resigned experts of panel have a lot to say,” Charleston Gazette (West Virginia) May 30, 2011, Monday, at P5A, by Phil Kabler.

FOIA documents obtained from the governor’s office showed that expert members of the West Virginia Sesquicentennial Commission found themselves exasperated that their efforts and vision for the anniversary were being undermined by the state officials on the panel.

“Sarah Palin’s e-mails show her going to bat for state-owned creamery,” Washington Post, June 11, 2011, by T.W. Farnam.

Emails of former Alaskan governor Sarah Palin obtained by FOIA show that she fought to use government funds to keep an Alaskan creamery open after it racked up $1.5 million in losses and was forced to close.  More than 13,000 emails were released.

“Student visa program: New rules, same problems,” Associated Press, June 20, 2011, by Holdbrook Mohr.

A FOIA request by the Associated Press shows that the Department of State did not begin tracking complaints about the exploitation of students in the United States on the J-1 visa program until 2010.  An AP investigation found abuse of hundreds of students with J-1 visas in more than a dozen states.

“A style guide for spooks,” Washington Post, June 23, 2011, by Lisa Rein.

Governmentattic.com used the FOIA to win the release of the National Security Agency’s style guide.  The266-page manual which listed the meaning of acronyms such as “lnu” (last name unknown), “nfi” (no further information), and “FROG” (Free Rocket Over Ground).

“FBI records show late Gov. Ned McWherter never entangled in corruption cases,” Associated Press, June 26, 2011, by Erik Schelzig.

The 217-page FBI file on the late Tennessee Governor Ned McWherter shows that “at no time was a subject, witness, or a target in the Rocky top investigation.”  Rocky top was an investigation into widespread abuse of gambling licenses in Tennessee which led to the arrest of several state politicians.  The report was released under FOIA.

“Report: Feds downplayed ICE case dismissals; Documents show agency had approval to dismiss some deportation cases,” Houston Chronicle June 27, 2011, by Susan Carroll.

A Freedom of Information Act request by the Houston chronicle shows that the Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s chief counsel in Houston prioritized deportations of illegal immigrants who were a danger to public safety or national security.

“FOIA docs expose DHS agency irradiating Americans cover-up,” Washington Examiner, 29 June 2011, by Deborah Dupre.

Documents obtained through FOIA by the Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC) show that Transportation Security Administration employees working enclose Proximity to radiation-firing devices may have higher risk of developing cancer strokes, and heart disease.

The Diary of Anatoly Chernyaev, 1991 Top Gorbachev Adviser Chronicles Final Year of the Soviet Union

 

“Anatoly Chernyaev’s diary is one of the great internal records of the Gorbachev years, a trove of irreplacable observations about a turning point in history. There is nothing else quite like it, allowing the reader to sit at Gorbachev’s elbow at the time of perestroika and glasnost, experiencing the breakthroughs and setbacks. It is a major contribution to our understanding of this momentous period.”

David E. Hoffman, Pulitzer Prize-winning author of The Dead Hand

Washington D.C., May 25, 2011 – Marking the 90th birthday of former top Gorbachev advisor Anatoly Sergeevich Chernyaev, the National Security Archive today publishes on the Web at www.nsarchive.org the latest installment of the unique and invaluable Chernyaev diary, covering the final fateful year of the Soviet Union, 1991.

Chief foreign policy aide to Gorbachev from 1986 through 1991 and a leading architect of perestroika and “new thinking,” Anatoly Sergeevich remains a champion of glasnost, sharing his notes, documents and first-hand insights with scholars trying to understand the peaceful end of the Cold War and the dissolution of the Soviet Union.  In 2004, he donated the originals of his detailed diaries covering the years from 1972 through 1991, to the National Security Archive in order to ensure permanent public access to this record – beyond the reach of political uncertainties in contemporary Russia.

Translated into English for the first time, by Anna Melyakova and edited by Svetlana Savranskaya of the Archive’s Russia/Eurasia program, today’s posting on the year 1991 is the sixth installment of the Archive’s publication of the Chernyaev diary, now covering all of the crucial Gorbachev years, 1985 through 1991.

Anatoly Sergeevich Chernyaev was born on May 25, 1921 in Moscow.  He fought in World War II beginning in 1941, and after the war, resumed his studies at Moscow State University in the Department of History, graduating in 1948.  From 1950 to 1958, he taught contemporary history at Moscow State, and from 1958 to 1961 worked in Prague on the editorial board of the theoretical journal Problems of Peace and Socialism.  Returning to Moscow in 1961, he joined the International Department of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union, rising to a senior position in charge of relations with West European Communist parties, and acquiring a well-deserved reputation as an innovative thinker and reformer.

In early 1986, the new Party General Secretary, Mikhail Gorbachev, asked him to serve as chief foreign policy adviser; and from that point on, Chernyaev remained at Gorbachev’s side in the highest-level summit meetings with leaders like Ronald Reagan and Margaret Thatcher, and even during the August 1991 coup attempt by hardliners – the central dramatic moment of the 1991 diary published today.  A prolific writer and speaker, Chernyaev has authored six books in addition to numerous articles in Soviet, Russian, European, and American journals.

The 1991 Chernyaev diary chronicles the final momentous year in the history of the Soviet Union, leading to the final lowering of the Soviet flag over the Kremlin on December 25.  Signals of that denouement occur early in the diary for the year, as some of Gorbachev’s closest associates leave him.  Foreign minister Eduard Shevardnadze resigns warning of looming dictatorship, and the leading “new thinker,” Alexander Yakovlev, becomes more and more estranged from Gorbachev – who in Chernyaev’s account finds it harder and harder to stay ahead of the wave of change that he himself had unleashed.

As in the previous installments of the diary, the reader gets a chance to experience the tumultuous Moscow almost first-hand.  Chernyaev  describes the winter of 1991 when the situation was bordering on famine, and where the author had to stand for hours in line to buy bread and milk, while protests were organized by the opposition with slogans “down with Gorbachev.”  Through every day of 1991 Gorbachev’s main goal is to preserve the Soviet Union, to prepare and sign the new Union treaty, which would open the possibility of a voluntary association of former republics in a new democratizing entity.  The reader can follow the process step by step through Chernyaev’s notes.

Throughout the year, Chernyaev describes in eyewitness terms the deep tensions between Gorbachev and Yeltsin, and Gorbachev’s enormous frustrations with the lack of tangible financial support from the West that might have given him cards to play against the hardliners and the radical reformers, towards more of a soft landing for a demilitarized Soviet Union – for example, at the G-7 summit in July 1991 where Gorbachev came away empty-handed.

The extraordinary diary account of the August coup, from Chernyaev’s privileged view at the Gorbachev dacha at Foros, captures the tension and uncertainty of the moment and provides profound insights both on the coup plotters and on the way the failed coup left Gorbachev even more weakened.  By the evidence in the diary, Chernyaev was well ahead of Gorbachev in understanding that letting the Baltics and Georgia peacefully leave the Soviet Union was the only even remote possibility of preserving the Soviet Union as a democratizing state.

It is impossible to overestimate the uniqueness and importance of the Chernyaev diary for our understanding of these crucial years in world history, when the Cold War ended, Germany and Europe unified, and the Soviet Union dissolved.  Scholars and students are forever in Anatoly Sergeevich’s debt.

 


Tributes to Anatoly Chernyaev on his 90th Birthday

Sir Rodric Braithwaite
British Ambassador to the Soviet Union and Russia, 1988-1991

Chernyaev with Lyudmila Rudakova

I first met Anatoli Chernyaev in January 1989 – to discuss arrangements for Gorbachev’s forthcoming visit to London –  when I was the British ambassador in Moscow and he was Gorbachev’s diplomatic adviser. On that first occasion the Foreign Ministry insisted on providing a chaperone: I did not let them do it again. I was charmed to discover a man with a bristling moustache, the courteous look and air of a colonel of an English county regiment, twinkling eyes, a wicked sense of ironic humour and a gurgling chuckle, and a penetrating intelligence. He was a man one felt one could trust – always frank, always judicious, never indiscreet, silent when it would have been wrong to speak, but careful never to mislead; in short, in the words of his idol Margaret Thatcher, a man with whom one could do business – with pleasure.

Over the next three years I did do a fair amount of business with him, mostly routine, but occasionally not. In May 1989 I brought him a letter from Mrs Thatcher saying that we had just expelled thirteen Soviet citizens from Britain because we thought they were spies. His reaction was typical: “Are you sure you’ve got the right ones?” I said “Yes”, of course, even though I was not at all sure.

Much more dramatic was the discussion we had some days after the shootings in Vilnius in January 1991. Chernyaev was more tired and depressed that I had ever seen him, and bitter about the way Gorbachev’s liberal advisers were deserting him. He told me with great emotion that he himself was sticking by Gorbachev because he knew that Gorbachev’s policies had not really changed: if he thought a change were taking place, he too would leave. He was uncharacteristically touchy and defensive, though he was as courteous as ever. The incident demonstrated some of his most sterling characteristics: intense loyalty to a man he admired; but a loyalty tempered by criticism where he thought it justified, because in no circumstances was he prepared to abandon his own independence of mind.

Securely rooted by inclination and education in the Moscow intelligentsia, he showed that independence at school, in the army, at university, and in the International Department of the Central Committee Secretariat where he spent much of his career before becoming Gorbachev’s foreign policy adviser in 1986. From then on he was at the centre of foreign policy making as long as the Soviet Union existed. He has left a unique record and witness of his time: a memoir of his earlier years, another of his time with Gorbachev. He has published much of the diary which he kept throughout his life. With his colleagues at the Gorbachev Foundation he has published notes on the meetings of the Politburo and a volume of extracts from the records of Gorbachev’s meetings with foreign leaders. All these are indispensable sources for anyone who wants to write the history of those momentous days. They alone would be sufficient to secure his place in history.

In the years since then I have often seen him in Moscow. He came to stay with us twice in London, once with a colleague and once with his indispensable and splendid partner, Ludmila Rudakova. He himself says that it is thanks to her that he has maintained his vitality of mind and spirit right into his present advanced age. I count myself privileged to have the good fortune to know such a remarkable man.

William Taubman
Amherst College, Pulitzer Prize-winning author of Khrushchev: The Man and His Era

Anatoly Sergeyevich Chernyaev is one of the wonders of the world. Born just after the Bolshevik revolution and survivor of its horrors, he tried for decades to get the Communist party to live up to the best of its ideals, all the while recording his doubts and the party’s failures in a marvelously revealing diary. Then, he served as one of Mikhail Gorbachev’s top aides, helping his boss transform their country and end the cold war, while continuing to record and explain perestroika’s successes and shortcomings. Since the fall of the USSR, Anatoly Sergeyevich has worked at the Gorbachev Foundation, applying his unique experience and perspective to document and make sense of the USSR’s last years. For all these contributions, for his courage, integrity and ability to see the world both as it is and as it might become, Anatoly Sergeyevich deserves the highest praise and tribute on his ninetieth birthday.

Archie Brown
Oxford University, UK

Anatoliy Sergeevich Chernyaev has had a most remarkable life. For a man who fought throughout World War Two in the Soviet army – an army which played by far the greatest part in the defeat of Nazi Germany in Europe – to be still a vigorous presence in the Gorbachev Foundation today demonstrates heroic resilience. Two contributions of Anatoliy Sergeevich will be long remembered. They will be recorded by historians even centuries from now, assuming we have managed to save life on this planet. The first is his enlightened influence on Soviet foreign policy during perestroika. Mikhail Sergeevich Gorbachev chose the perfect foreign policy adviser, giving Chernyaev the freedom to say exactly what he thought and to play a highly significant role in the foreign policy-making process and in the development and implementation of the New Political Thinking. The second achievement is Anatoliy Sergeevich’s role as a witness and participant-observer. His books, diaries, notes of Politburo and other high-level meetings, and contributions to scholarly conferences are outstandingly important primary sources for all who study Soviet politics, perestroika, the transformation of Soviet foreign policy under Gorbachev, and the end of the Cold War. Those of us who have met and been helped in our own work by Anatoliy Sergeevich can add something else that we value immensely. Although he has earned his own place in history, he has combined a self-effacing modesty with great generosity in his willingness to share his knowledge with those who seek to learn from him. Anatoliy Sergeevich! Warmest congratulations on your ninetieth birthday! May you have many years still to enlighten us!

Stephen Cohen
New York University

Living in Soviet Russia in the 1970s, long before I met Anatoly Chernyaev personally in the late 1980s, I heard about him from Moscow friends — most of them political nonconformists, even dissidents.  He was the only person in high official circles they ever spoke about as a “truly decent and honorable” (poriadochnyi) man.

For me, Anatoly Chernyaev exemplifies what were once the highest qualities of a Russian intelligent and of a citizen in the finest sense of the word, in four respects:

First, he has been a good man in good political times but also, unlike so many others, in bad political times.

Second, he has remained true to his humanistic and democratic beliefs, even when these beliefs were dangerous.

Third, though his “ideological” beliefs are strong, they have never clouded his common sense of wisdom about events.

And fourth, he has told truth to power, even to his friend and the leader he has served so long and well, Mikhail Gorbachev.

As a result, Russia and the world are better today because of the role played by Chernyaev.

In short, Anatoly Chernyaev’s life is a model to which we all should aspire but which few of us will ever attain.

ELEVEN POSSIBILITIES FOR PENTAGON PAPERS’ “11 WORDS”

The aspect of the Pentagon Papersthat has received the most attention is perhaps the U.S. Government’s attempt to keep under wraps 11 words on one page that had in fact been in the public domain since the government edition of the Papers was published by the House Armed Services Committee (HASC) in 1972. At the eleventh hour the censors, after intervention by National Archives and Presidential Library staff, abandoned that idea and left the words in the text, thus avoiding drawing attention to them. Still, speculation has been rife about what the “11 Words” were.

Classification authorities were quite right—from the standpoint of protecting secrecy—to leave the text as it stands. This makes it impossible to know what bit of the Pentagon Papers was at issue, and with the 11 Words embedded in more than 7,000 pages of text, identifying them precisely poses a huge challenge. Because the 11 Words were originally declassified long ago, there is nothing to highlight them, and the mass of the text makes it difficult just to review the material. Only speculation is feasible.

In keeping with the numerical motif, the National Security Archive here offers 11 possibilities for the identity of the 11 Words. There were two criteria for selection: that the information seemed somehow significant, and that it not figure among any of the newly declassified passages.

1. CONSIDERING A COUP AGAINST NGO DINH DIEM IN AUGUST 1963 (IV. B. 5, p. iv): The analyst explains two broad views in USG, that (1) there was no realistic alternative to Diem or (2) that war against NLF could not possibly be won with Diem in power. Text continues, “The first view was primarily supported by the military and the CIA both in Washington and in Saigon.” [In this possibility, the knowledge being protected would be agreement between CIA and the military on defending Diem’s rule. Presumably the deletion would preserve the general public impression that more sophisticated CIA views about Vietnam always differed from military ones. The problem with this approach is both that the early identity of views is apparent in a multitude of other evidence, and also that there is different evidence showing the CIA helping the Kennedy administration identify potential South Vietnamese leaders other than Diem.]

NARA (2011)
House Armed Services Committee (1972)
Gravel Edition (1971)

2. SIMPLE ID of a CIA DOCUMENT (IV. C. 1, p. 23): Relates to the Temporary Duty (TDY) Group sent to South Vietnam to study conditions in the post-Diem period. Apparently two (of three) cables sent were attributed to it mistakenly but were actually from CIA’s chief of station in Saigon. “The ‘Initial Report of CAS Group Findings in SVN,’ dated 10 February 1964 began by acknowledging that the group activities had been temporarily disrupted by the Khanh coup.” [This excision would represent an attempt by the CIA censors to protect the identity of a particular document, supposedly shielding it from FOIA requests. The problem with that strategy is that the several cables referred to, which contain the substance of the study group report, have been declassified for many years. “CAS” in this text stands for “Controlled American Source,” a euphemism used in Vietnam for the CIA.]

NARA (2011)
House Armed Services Committee (1972)
Gravel Edition (1971)

3. COVERT ATTACKS ON NORTH VIETNAM (IV. C. 1, p. 83): Discussing what the U.S. might do under various conditions as of mid-June 1964, the analyst writes: “The proposed ‘Elements of a Policy That Does Not Include a Congressional Resolution’ consisted largely of an elaboration of covert measures that were already either approved or nearing approval. This included RECCE-STRIKE and T-28 operations all over Laos and small-scale RECCE STRIKE Operations in North Vietnam after appropriate provocation.” [This is an interesting candidate for the 11 Words for two reasons. First, it reminds the public that Washington was set on air strikes against North Vietnam earlier than usually remembered—a fact that has become obscure over time. Second, and most important from the standpoint of war powers, it shows that the administration believed it had the authority to initiate bombing operations without any congressional action at all. These 11 Words, if this was the actual candidate language, would be of primary interest to the White House. In the sentence quoted, “Recce” is a shortened form for “reconnaissance,” and T-28 is a type of propeller-driven fighter-bomber.]

NARA (2011)
House Armed Services Committee (1972)
Gravel Edition (1971)

4. NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY (NSA) EQUIPMENT REVEALED (IV.C.3, p. 17): Analysts describe the instructions issued for an electronic monitoring mission called a DE SOTO Patrol to be sent into the Tonkin Gulf in early February 1965. They note that The Joint Chiefs of Staff instructed U.S. Pacific commanders to structure their operations plan “covering a two destroyer Patrol Group with on-line Crypto RATT and Star Shell illumination capabilities.” [This possibility would be consonant with NSA predilections for deleting anything that concerns its activities, even though the agency itself has declassified the fact of the presence of NSA detachments on DE SOTO Patrol destroyers. The likely rationale would be that “on-line Crypto RATT” identifies a particular communications device, a secure-line radio teleprinter. The device would have been in the suite of the NSA van placed on one of the destroyers. The problem with this redaction is that when the National Security Agency in 2008 declassified a mass of materials pertinent to the Gulf of Tonkin Incident, one of those items identified all equipment in the NSA vans, including the actual designation of this device.]

NARA (2011)
House Armed Services Committee (1972)
Gravel Edition (1971)

5. ACTION AGAINST CAMBODIA (IV. C. 6 (b), p. 38): Describing proposals by U.S. Pacific theater commander Admiral U.S. Grant Sharp in early 1967, the Pentagon Papers analyst quotes text from Sharp’s cable identifying one major problem as the North Vietnamese sanctuaries in Cambodia and discussing potential countermeasures. In the course of his dispatch Admiral Sharp notes “it is understood that a Joint State, Defense and CIA committee is considering this problem.[The eventual U.S. solution—which dragged Cambodia into the war without actually solving the sanctuary problem, was to invade Cambodia in the spring of 1970. This deletion would have the effect of disguising how early in the war the U.S. was considering such measures.]

NARA (2011)
House Armed Services Committee (1972)
Gravel Edition (1971)

6. BOMBING NORTH VIETNAM (IV. C. 7 (a), p. 53): The Pentagon Papers analysts paused in their narrative at intervals to assess the effects of bombing North Vietnam. In their discussion of the aerial campaign’s status at the end of 1965, the analysts noted “Of 91 known locks and dams in NVN, only 8 targeted as significant to inland waterways, flood control, or irrigation.[There has been a lively debate in the United States as to whether U.S. forces sought to encourage flooding in North Vietnam. This is usually timed as having occurred in 1972 and formulated as “bombing the dikes.” The U.S. Government position has been—despite some evidence to the contrary—that no measures of this kind were ever taken and that damage to dikes, if any, must have been inadvertent. The issue is complicated in that U.S. air commanders would have regarded bombing of dams and locks associated with North Vietnamese waterborne supply movements as legitimate military targets. On the other side is the fact that destruction of dikes and levees is listed as a general option in the 1967 bombing volume as well. However, this text indicates intent related to a specific number of targets, and that North Vietnamese water control mechanisms were targeted from very early in the air campaign known as Rolling Thunder.]

NARA (2011)
House Armed Services Committee (1972)
Gravel Edition (1971)

7. CIA ON BOMBING NORTH VIETNAM, MARCH 1966 REPORT (IV. C. 7 (a), p. 83): “The March CIA report, with its obvious bid to turn ROLLING THUNDER into a punitive bombing campaign and its nearly obvious promise of real payoff . . .” [The CIA is not supposed to involve itself in policy. This possibility for the 11 words would disguise a fairly explicit statement by a Pentagon Papers analyst that the agency was doing precisely that. The problem with this redaction is that in quite a few passages the Pentagon Papers treat the CIA as another Washington agency whose views needed to be taken into account.]

NARA (2011)
House Armed Services Committee (1972)
Gravel Edition (1971)

8. DEFECTOR PROVIDES INTELLIGENCE, MARCH 1968 (IV. C. 7 (b), p. 154): In his discussion of the evolution of Rolling Thunder during the period after the Tet Offensive of early 1968, the Pentagon Papers analyst indicates that the CIA input of a report on Soviet and Chinese aid to North Vietnam of March 2 “was based on the report of a high-level defector and concluded with a disturbing estimate of how the Soviets would react to the closing of Haiphong harbor.” [This is one of those classic deletion options supposed to protect CIA “sources and methods.” However, it is difficult to see what would be protected by deleting this information in 2011, considering that the material had been in the open for the entire period since 1971, and that the identities of all North Vietnamese, Chinese, and Soviet defectors were inevitably known to the security services of those countries. In addition, nothing in the Pentagon Papers divulges the actual identity of the intelligence source.]

NARA (2011)
House Armed Services Committee (1972)
Gravel Edition (1971)

9. FIRST APPROVAL OF U.S. AIR STRIKES (IV. C. 9 (a), p. 63): During the Saigon political crisis of January 1965, in which General Nguyen Khanh made the latest in the series of coups, countercoups, and self-coups that bedeviled South Vietnam during the 1963-1965 period, the Pentagon Papers analyst notes that, “In the midst of the crisis General Westmoreland obtained his first authority to use U.S. forces for combat within South Vietnam. Arguing that the VC might go for a spectacular victory during the disorders, he asked for and obtained authority to use U.S. jet aircraft in a strike role.” [This major change in U.S. rules of engagement and combat authorities in Vietnam took place virtually without notice. Previously it had widely (though incorrectly) been understood that U.S. forces were not engaged in direct combat in South Vietnam. Moreover, with respect to aircraft, the general impression has been that the use of American jets against North Vietnam in so-called “tit for tat” strikes represented the moment when the rules changed. In addition, Westmoreland’s permission to engage was subject merely to the agreement of the U.S. ambassador to South Vietnam, without reference to Washington. In the context of today’s debates over war powers, especially in Libya, this public domain language, long open, might have seemed more sensitive. This is another deletion that, if made, would have favored the White House.]

NARA (2011)
House Armed Services Committee (1972)
Gravel Edition (1971)

10. CIA ROLE IN DIEM’S 1955 SAIGON PUTSCH (V. B. 3, p. 812): In the appended volumes of collected documents which it includes, the Pentagon Papers contain a December 13, 1954 cable from U.S. chargé d’affaires Randal Kidder to the State Department in which he reports that “Through Colonel Lansdale’s group and the CAS, I am canvassing attitude of sect leaders and genuineness of their alleged threats.” The CIA’s role in Diem’s 1955 political maneuvers, in which the agency covertly funded Diem and drove a wedge between South Vietnam’s political-religious sects that enabled the Saigon leader to defeat them, is among the most important and least explored aspects of the United States role in Vietnam. At the height of a Saigon political crisis in the spring of 1955, the investment sunk into the Diem option led the CIA to obstruct the policy of the U.S. ambassador to South Vietnam. In the light of troubles with Diem later on, the CIA role at this early stage is no doubt even more embarrassing. [The CIA continues today to resist the declassification of agency histories of these activities. They were probably surprised to find in this long-declassified document a confirmation that that activity was in progress. This episode is controversial because some evidence indicates that CIA director Allen W. Dulles colluded with his brother, Secretary of State John Foster Dulles, to subvert the policy of President Dwight Eisenhower’s designated personal representative, General J. Lawton Collins.]

NARA (2011)
House Armed Services Committee (1972)
Gravel Edition (1971)

11. NSA INTERCEPTION OF SOVIET LEADERS’ TELEPHONE CONVERSATIONS (VI.C.3 (1), p. 61-62): This possibility for the intended deletion is as intriguing as it is misconceived. In February 1967, in the course of a Johnson administration peace feeler known as SUNFLOWER, British Prime Minister Harold Wilson made certain representations in President Johnson’s behalf to Soviet leader Alexei Kosygin. Kosygin promptly reported the approach to his colleague Leonid Brezhnev by encrypted telephone: “at 9:30 a.m. today according to a telephone intercept Kosygin called Brezhnev and said [there was] a great possibility of achieving the aim.” [This redaction would presumably be intended to shield an NSA intercept program from the Russians. The idea that any such aim could be accomplished is unrealistic for a number of reasons. First, syndicated columnist Jack Anderson wrote about this NSA program as early as 1971. Second, this statement occurs in the middle of a passage that similarly reveals the NSA knew—undoubtedly also from interception—which ciphers Kosygin was using in written communications (the “President’s Cipher”), and could identify by their length in specific numbers of code groups the resultant cables into and from the Soviet embassy in Hanoi. In other words, there was much more to protect in this passage than the telephone intercepts. Third, the diplomatic volumes were not part of the 1972 declassification.  When a version of the diplomatic volumes was declassified, in 1978, this passage was permitted onto the public record in its entirety. In fact, the whole set of revelations was published in 1983, when historian George C. Herring edited a version of these volumes, The Secret Diplomacy of the Vietnam War: The Negotiating Volumes of the Pentagon Papers (Austin: University of Texas Press, 1983, p. 468-9). Fourth, the same language was again released in 2003 when the U.S. government fully declassified the diplomatic volumes.

NARA (2011)
House Armed Services Committee (1972)
Gravel Edition (1971)

As noted at the outset it is impossible for anyone other than the censors to know what the 11 Words in fact are. The above suggestions should be considered as no more than possibilities. Of these selections, those regarding the Diem coup, the covert attacks on North Vietnam (in two possibilities), the considerations of Cambodia, and the first approval of U.S. airstrikes, are relevant to debates about legal authorities to make war. Aside from their historical importance, there seems little reason for the imposition of secrecy. The case that concerns CIA assessments of bombing North Vietnam, and that of the Agency’s role in Diem’s 1955 powerplay are about the CIA’s image and role. The selection that concerns bombing of North Vietnam’s dams and levees would represent the censors’ intervention in an historical controversy.

The most straightforward application of secrecy doctrines is represented in several of the possibilities, specifically the identification of a particular CIA document, the mention of a defector as a source for another CIA report, the mention of a National Security Agency (NSA) secure communications system, and that of the NSA telephone intercepts of Soviet leaders. In each of these cases the claim to secrecy has been mooted by the passage of time, the declassification of other records that do not form parts of the Pentagon Papers, or the fact that American adversaries already knew of the relevant information.

I offer two selections as my best guesses for the 11 Words. First is the possibility the CIA is continuing to try and disguise its 1955 involvement with Diem. This is inconvenient in that it reveals the Agency laying the groundwork for a course that would later diverge from official policy, calling its responsiveness to authority into question. My second possibility concerns the NSA equipment, mainly because that organization has a tendency toward reflexive secrecy, and likely paid little attention to having previously released the same information.

One aspect of this 11 Words business is that whoever sought to suppress the information must have had some expectation that preserving secrecy was actually possible. This would seem to rule out any material that appears in the Gravel edition of the Pentagon Papers. As it turns out, nine of eleven of these items—including the NSA equipment—do indeed figure in the Gravel edition. There are two exceptions. One is the mention of NSA radio telephone intercepts, but this has been public since 1978 and was published in 1983. The only exclusion that did not form part of Gravel and did not appear elsewhere is the item concerning CIA machinations with Ngo Dinh Diem in Saigon in 1954-1955. I therefore conclude that the Saigon CIA material is the best candidate for the 11 Words. It appears in Book 10 of the HASC edition of the Papers at page 812.

What these suggestions show above all is the arbitrary and even silly operation of the secrecy system. In case after case the censors would have been protecting information the disclosure of which threatens no damage to the national security of the United States—the actual criterion for classification. Any damage would have occurred in 1972 when these materials were published. It did not. Furthermore, Agency image and interests do not equate to the national security of the United States. Excisions that attempt to minimize the attention that might be drawn to aspects of the history of the Vietnam war that now seem embarrassing, controvert self-image, or seem inconvenient in the light of current political debates should not be taken for national security secrets that merit protection.

The United States, China, and the Bomb – TOP-SECRET

The National Security Archive has initiated a special project on the Chinese nuclear weapons program and U.S. policy toward it. The purpose is to discover how the U.S. government monitored the Chinese nuclear program and ascertain what it knew (or believed that it knew) and thought about that program from the late 1950s to the present. Besides investigating U.S. thinking about, and intelligence collection on, the Chinese nuclear program as such, the Archive’s staff is exploring its broader foreign policy significance, especially the impact on China’s relations with its neighbors and the regional proliferation of nuclear weapons capabilities. Through archival research and systematic declassification requests, the Archive is working to collect key U.S. documents on important developments in Chinese nuclear history, including weapons, delivery systems, and strategic thinking. To put the nuclear issue in the broader context of the changing relations between the United States and China, the Archive is also trying to secure the declassification of key U. S. policy papers that elucidate changes in the relationship.

In particular, the Archive’s project is exploring Washington’s thinking about the Chinese nuclear weapons program in the context of U.S. nuclear proliferation policy. The Archive is probing Washington’s initial effort to brake the development of the Chinese advanced weapons program by encouraging allies and others to abstain from the shipment of products that could have direct or indirect military applications. Moreover, the Archive is seeking the declassification of materials that shed light on an important concern since the late 1980s, China’s alleged role as a contributor to the proliferation of nuclear capabilities in South Asia and elsewhere. To the extent possible, the Archive will try to document the U.S. government’s knowledge of, and policy toward, China’s role as a nuclear proliferator and its efforts to balance proliferation concerns with a policy of cooperation with Beijing.

In the spring of 1996, the Archive began a series of Freedom of Information and mandatory review requests to the CIA, State Department, Defense Department, National Archives, and other agencies to prompt the release of relevant documents. Although this will take time, the State Department’s own systematic declassification review of central files from the 1960s has already made available some very useful material. Moreover, previous declassification requests by the Archive are beginning to generate significant material. This makes it possible for the Archive to display, on our Web site, some newly released documents on U.S. policy toward the Chinese nuclear weapons program.

The documents that follow are from 1964 when U.S. government officials recognized that China would soon acquire a nuclear weapons capability. As this material indicates, the degree of apprehension varied, with some officials truly worried that a nuclear armed China would constitute a formidable threat to the security of China’s neighbors as well as the United States. Others, however, believed that Beijing’s orientation was fundamentally cautious and defensive and that the political and psychological implications would be more immediately consequential than any military threat. Although China’s attitude toward U.S.-Soviet nonproliferation efforts was hostile, as far as can be determined, no one anticipated a development of later decades: the PRC’s apparent role as a purveyor of nuclear weapons and delivery systems technologies.

This briefing book was prepared by William Burr, the Archive’s analyst for the China nuclear weapons project and for a related project on U.S. nuclear weapons policies and programs. Currently a member of Dipomatic History‘s editorial board, he has published articles there and in the Bulletin of the Cold War International History Project. He previously directed the Archive’s project on the Berlin Crisis, 1958-1962 (published by Chadwyck-Healey in 1992).

The National Security Archive thanks the W. Alton Jones Foundation for the generous financial support that made this project possible. Anthony Wai, Duke University, and Matthew Shabatt, Stanford University, provided invaluable research assistance for this project.

Document 1, “Implications of a Chinese Communist Nuclear Capability”, by Robert H. Johnson, State Department Policy Planning Staff, with forwarding memorandum to President Johnson by Policy Planning Council director Walt W. Rostow, 17 April 1964. Source: U.S. National Archives, Record Group 59, Department of State Records, Central Foreign Policy Files, 1964-1966, file DEF 12-1 Chicom.Robert Johnson (now associated with the National Planning Association) was one of the Department’s leading China experts. Between 1962 and 1964, he directed a number of studies on the Chinese nuclear program and its ramifications, not only for the United States but also for China’s neighbors in East and South Asia. This document is a summary of a longer study which remains classified but is undergoing declassification review. In this paper Johnson minimized the immediate military threat of a nuclear China, suggesting instead that Chinese leaders were more interested in a nuclear capability’s deterrent effect and were unlikely to engage in high-risk activities. Consistent with his relatively moderate interpretation, Johnson ruled out preemptive action against Chinese nuclear facilities except in “response to major ChiCom aggression.” Johnson explored the issue of preemption in another study: “The Bases for Direct Action Against Chinese Communist Nuclear Facilities,” also April 1964. That study is unavailable but is discussed in document 5.

Document 2, Special National Intelligence Estimate, “The Chances of an Imminent Communist Chinese Nuclear Explosion” 26 August 1964.

Source: Lyndon B. Johnson Library

The timing of a Chinese atomic test was a controversial subject during the summer and fall of 1964. As this document shows, CIA officials believed that the Chinese would not test a weapon until “sometime after the end of 1964.” State Department China specialist Allen Whiting, an official at the Bureau of Intelligence and Research, thought otherwise. Like his colleagues he was unaware that the Chinese had an operating gaseous diffusion plant which was producing weapons-grade material. Yet, he made more than the CIA of the fact that the Chinese had already constructed a 325 foot test tower at Lop Nur. Whiting was certain that the Chinese would not have taken the trouble to construct a tower unless a test was impending, although CIA technical experts were dubious. As other intelligence information becomes available, Whiting estimated a test on 1 October. (Interview with Whiting by William Burr, 13 December 1996).

Document 3, Memorandum for the Record, McGeorge Bundy, 15 September 1964

Source: Lyndon B. Johnson Library.

This report of a meeting between President Johnson’s top advisers discloses the administration’s basic approach toward the first Chinese nuclear test but nevertheless raises questions that have yet to be settled. Although it is evident that the administration had provisionally ruled out a preemptive strike, it is unclear whether Secretary of State Rusk ever had any substantive discussions of the Chinese nuclear issue with Soviet Ambassador Dobrynin during the weeks after this meeting.

Until recently, paragraph 3 of this document was entirely excised but a successful appeal by the National Security Archive led the National Archives to release all but the date of the proposed “Chinat” overflight, presumably by a U-2. The date of the overflight is unknown although a number took place in late 1964 and early 1965 to monitor Chinese nuclear weapons facilities.

Document 4, “China As a Nuclear Power (Some Thoughts Prior to the Chinese Test)”, 7 October 1964

Source: FOIA request to State Department

This document was prepared by the Office of International Security Affairs at the Department of Defense, possibly by, or under the supervision of Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense Henry S. Rowen, who drafted other papers on the Chinese nuclear program during this period. It probably typified the “worst case” scenarios developed by those who believed that a nuclear China would become such a serious threat that it would be necessary to attack Chinese nuclear weapons facilities as a counter-proliferation measure.

Document 5, State Department Telegram No. 2025 to U.S. Embassy Paris, 9 October 1964

Source: U.S. National Archives, Record Group 59, Department of State Records, Central Foreign Policy Files, 1964-1966, file DEF 12-1 Chicom

This document provides one example of Washington’s efforts to get “hard” information on the PRC’s atomic test not long before it occurred on 16 October. In early September, several weeks before the State Department sent this cable, Allen Whiting saw a CIA report on a meeting earlier in the year between Chinese Premier Zhou Enlai and President of Mali Modibo Keita, when Zhou was visiting West Africa. Zhou told Keita that China would be testing an atomic device in October and asked him to give political support to the test when it occurred. Whiting was sure that Zhou’s statement should be taken seriously and on the basis of this and other information he convinced Secretary of State Rusk to announce, on 29 September, that a test would soon occur. (Interview with Whiting). The CIA report is unavailable but this telegram suggests that Zhou’s statement or similar comments by PRC officials to friendly governments may have leaked to the press.

Document 6, “Destruction of Chinese Nuclear Weapons Capabilities”, by G.W. Rathjens, U.S. Arms Control and Disarmament Agency, 14 December 1964.

Source: FOIA request to State Department

George Rathjens, the author of this document, was an ACDA official serving on an interagency group, directed by White House staffer Spurgeon Keeny, that assisted the President’s Task Force on the Spread of Nuclear Weapons, better known as the Gilpatric Committee after its chairman, former Deputy Secretary of Defense Roswell Gilpatric. Whether Rathjens prepared it as his own initiative or at the Committee’s request is unclear, but it may have been the latter because the Committee considered the possibility of recommending an attack on Chinese nuclear weapons facilities as part of a program to check nuclear proliferation. In this document, Rathjens summarized Roben Johnson’s still classified study of the costs and benefits of various types of attacks on the Chinese nuclear weapons complex. Apparently one of the possibilities, an “air drop of GRC [Government of the Republic of China] sabotage team” received serious consideration earlier in the year.

Taking a more bullish view of the benefits of attacking Chinese nuclear facilities, Rathjens took issue with Johnson’s conclusion that the “significance of a [Chicom nuclear] capability is not such as to justify the undertaking of actions which would involve great political costs or high military risks.” However confident Rathjens may have been that a successful attack could discourage imitators and check nuclear proliferation, that recommendation did not go into the final report, which has recently been declassified in full.

Before ACDA declassified this document in its entirety, a lightly excised version was available at the Johnson Library. Shane Maddock of the U.S. Coast Guard Academy’s History Department, published the excised version with stimulating commentary in the April 1996 issue of the SHAFR Newsletter.

Document 7, “As Explosive as a Nuclear Weapon”: The Gilpatric Report on Nuclear Proliferation, January 1965

Source: Freedom of Information Act request to State Department

Sections excised from previous releases are outlined in red.

Note: Since the Archive published this document, the Department of State has released Foreign Relations of the United States, Arms Control and Disarmament, 1964-1968, Volume XI, which includes the full text of the Gilpatric Report along with valuable background material.

Here the Archive publishes, for the first time, the complete text of the “Gilpatric Report”, the earliest major U.S. government-sponsored policy review of the spread of nuclear weapons. Largely motivated by concern over the first Chinese atomic test in October 1964, President Lyndon B. Johnson asked Wall Street lawyer and former Deputy Secretary of Defense Roswell Gilpatric to lead a special task force in investigating, and making policy recommendations on, the spread of nuclear weapons. Owing to his extensive connections in high-level corporate and governmental circles, Gilpatric was able to recruit a group of unusually senior former government officials, including DCI Allen Dulles, U. S. High Commissioner to Germany John J. McCloy, White House Science Adviser George Kistiakowsky, and SACEUR Alfred Gruenther. Johnson announced the formation of the committee on 1 November 1964. The committee completed its report in early 1965 and presented it to President Johnson on 21 January 1965.

The report came at a time when senior Johnson administration officials had important disagreements over nuclear proliferation policy. Johnson and Secretary of State Dean Rusk were already heavily committed to a Multilateral Force [MLF] designed to give the Germans and other European allies the feeling of sharing control over NATO nuclear weapons decisions while diverting them from developing independent nuclear capabilities. This complicated negotiations with Moscow which saw the MLF as incompatible with a nonproliferation treaty; nevertheless, Johnson and Rusk gave the MLF priority on the grounds that it would secure West Germany’s non-nuclear status1 . Further, some senior officials thought that nuclear proliferation was inevitable and, among the right countries, potentially desirable. Thus, during a November 1964 meeting, Rusk stated that he was not convinced that “the U.S. should oppose other countries obtaining nuclear weapons.” Not only could he “conceive of situations where the Japanese or the Indians might desirably have their own nuclear weapons”, Rusk asked “should it always be the U.S. which would have to use nuclear weapons against Red China?” Robert McNamara thought otherwise: it was “unlikely that the Indians or the Japanese would ever have a suitable nuclear deterrent2 .

The Gilpatric Committee tried to resolve the debate by taking an unhesitatingly strong position against nuclear proliferation, recommending that the United States “greatly intensify” its efforts to halt the spread of nuclear weapons. Besides calling for an international treaty on “non-dissemination and non-acquisition of nuclear weapons”, the report included a range of suggestions for inhibiting proliferation in specific countries in Europe, the Near East, and Asia. The latter generally involved a carrot and stick approach: inducements to discourage independent nuclear programs but a more assertive policy if inducements failed. For example, with respect to Israel, Washington would continue to offer “assurances” against Egyptian-Syrian attack; however, “make clear to Israel that those assurances would be withdrawn if she develops a nuclear weapons capability.” With respect to the MLF controversy, the report questioned Johnson administration policy by suggesting the “urgent exploration of alternatives” to permanently inhibit German nuclear weapons potential.

Spurgeon Keeny, the Committee’s staff director, believes that the report “got to LBJ that the Establishment was really worried about nuclear proliferation and that steps could be taken to do something about it”3 . Yet, however Johnson may have thought about the report’s line of argument and recommendations, his immediate response appears to have been skeptical because it challenged the Administration’s emphasis on the MLF as a means to manage the German nuclear problem. Unquestionably, this contributed heavily to his decision to bar circulation of the report except at the cabinet level. Dean Rusk fully agreed, according to Glenn Seaborg’s account of a briefing for Johnson, Rusk opined that the report was “as explosive as a nuclear weapon.” Like Johnson, Rusk worried about leaks; moreover, he opposed the report’s message on Germany as well as other countries that it singled out. Uncontrolled revelations about the report would have quickly complicated U.S. relations with France, Germany, and lsrael, among others4.

One important section of the report, on possible initiatives toward the Soviet Union and their relationship to nonproliferation goals, has been declassified for some time. In it (beginning on p. 16), the Committee called for a verified fissile material cutoff (although production of tritium permitted) and strategic arms control agreements. By recommending a strategic delivery vehicle freeze (misspelled “free” in text), significant reductions in strategic force levels, and a moratorium on ABM and ICBM construction, the report presaged (and went beyond) the SALT I agreement of 1972. Elsewhere (p. 8) the Committee called for U.S. efforts to work with the Soviets in building support for a comprehensive nuclear test ban. For the Committee, U.S.-Soviet cooperation in those areas were essential because they would help create an “atmosphere conducive to wide acceptance of restraints on nuclear proliferation.”

Participants and close observers have offered conflicting analyses of the report’s impact. Some, such as Atomic Energy Commission Chairman Glenn Seaborg, downplay its significance noting that other political developments had more influence on Johnson administration policy. Others, such as Keeny and Raymond Garthoff (who represented the State Department on the Committee’s interagency staff) believe that even if the Gilpatric report did not quickly lead to tangible policy changes, it educated the President as well as its members on the significance of the nuclear proliferation issue. Keeny further argues that the report helped prepare Johnson to give strong support to a nonproliferation treaty in 1966 after the MLF approach to the German nuclear problem had lost momentum5.

No doubt owing to classification problems, the literature on the Gilpatric Committee and the early history of U.S. non- proliferation policy is sparse6 . With the report fully declassified and other related information becoming available, it should now be possible for historians and social scientists to assess the Gilpatric Committee’s contribution to Lyndon Johnson’s nuclear proliferation policy. Whatever the Gilpatric report’s immediate impact may have been, the future turned out very differently than its critics anticipated. The slowing of nuclear proliferation has proven to be possible and a major goal of the Gilpatric committee–a nearly universal nonproliferation regime–came to pass. To the extent, however, that important measures supported by the Committee have yet to be acted upon–e.g., a fissile materials production cut off–or ratified, e.g., the CTBT–the report stands in harsh judgement of current international efforts to curb nuclear proliferation.

Notes

1. For a useful overview of the MLF-NPT interrelationships, see George Bunn, Arms Control By Committee, Managing Negotiations with the Russians (Stanford University Press, 1992), 64-72.
2. Presumably, Rusk thought it better that Asians use nuclear weapons against each other rather than Euro-Americans using them against Asians. Quotations from memorandum of conversation by Herbert Scoville, ACDA, “Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons- Course of Action for UNGA – Discussed by the Committee of Principals”, 23 November 1964, National Archives, Record Group 359, White House Office of Science and Technology, FOIA Release to National Security Archive.
3. Telephone conversation with Spurgeon Keeny, 24 March 1997.
4. Glenn Seaborg with Benjamin S. Loeb, Stemming the Tide: Arms Control in the Johnson Years (Lexington, MA: 1987), 143-145. This is the only generally available account of Johnson’s meeting with the committee. Neither Dean Rusk’s nor Lyndon Johnson’s memoirs mention the report.
5. Seaborg, Stemming the Tide, 148-149, although he provides a dissent from Keeny. Herbert York, Making Weapons, Talking Peace: A Physicists odyssey from Hiroshima to Geneva (New York, 1987), also downplays the report’s significance. Telephone conversation with Keeny, 24 March 1997; conversation with Raymond Garthoff, 28 March 1997. George Bunn, Arms Control by Committee, 75-81, is useful on the negotiations but does not mention the report.
6. George Perkovich’s “India’s Ambiguous Bomb” (forthcoming Ph.D. dissertation, University of Virginia), explores the impact of the Gilpatric report on Johnson’s policy, among other subjects.


For further reading:

Willis C. Armstrong et al., “The Hazards of Single-Outcome Forecasting,” in H. Bradford Westerfield, Inside ClA ‘s Private World: Declassified Articles from the Agency’s Internal Journal, 1955-1992 (New Haven, 1995), 238-254

Gordon H. Chang, Friends and Enemies: The United States, China, and the Soviet Union, 1948-1972 (Stanford, 1990)

Rosemary Foot, The Practice of Power, U.S. Relations with China Since 1949 (Oxford, 1995)

John Wilson Lewis and Xue Litai, China Builds The Bomb (Stanford, 1988)

Chris Pocock, Dragon Lady: The History of the U-2 Spyplane (Airlife, England, 1989), especially ch. 6, “Parting the Bamboo Curtain”

TOP-SECRET: THE OSAMA BIN LADEN FILE OF THE US-GOVERNMENT

Washington, D.C., July 23rd, 2011 – The Al Qaeda leader Osama Bin Laden, killed in Pakistan by U.S. special operations forces, ranked as “one of the most significant financial sponsors of Islamic terrorist activities in the world” as early as 1996, according to declassified U.S. documents posted on the web today by the National Security Archive at George Washington University (www.nsarchive.org).

The Osama Bin Laden File includes the CIA’s 1996 biographic sketch [Transcription], the infamous President’s Daily Brief from 6 August 2001 warning “Bin Ladin Determined to Strike in US,” a State Department issue paper from 2005 reporting that “some Taliban leaders operate with relative impunity in some Pakistan cities,” the 400-page Sandia National Laboratories profile of Bin Laden focusing on the 1998 U.S. embassy bombings in Kenya and Tanzania, the 2006 State Department cable on the Taliban’s regrouping in Pakistan’s tribal areas making them “a sanctuary beyond the reach of either Government,” the demands made on Pakistan right after 9/11 by Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage, and the only known conversation between the U.S. government and the Taliban leader Mullah Omar.

*             *             *

One of the earlier publicly available documentary mentions of Bin Laden comes from a 1996 CIA bio sketch entitled “Usama Bin Laden: Islamic Extremist Financer” [Transcription]. It describes Bin Laden, “who joined the Afghan resistance movement in 1979,” as “one of the most significant financial sponsors of Islamic extremist activities in the world.” According to The New York Times, during the Soviet occupation of Afghanistan, the CIA actually helped Bin Laden – who supplied construction equipment from his family’s company in Saudi Arabia – to construct the Tora Bora complex as a base to fight the Soviets.  According to Bin Laden, “The [Mujahidin’s] weapons were supplied by the Americans, the money by the Saudis.”

Almost a decade later, Bin Laden would make good use of his earlier investment. A 1997 State Department cable reported that he had likely retreated into hiding at Tora Bora, stating “bin Ladin had lived in caves south of Jalalabad in Tora Bora and the Taliban had become suspicious.” In December 2001, US troops engaged in a fierce firefight at Tora Bora, hoping to smoke out the Al Qaeda leader. The Taliban and Al Qaeda fighters were overrun but Bin Laden was not among the killed or captured.

The earlier CIA bio indicates that after the 1989 victory over the Soviets, Bin Laden, while living in Saudi Arabia and Sudan, created “a network of al-Qaida recruitment centers and guesthouses in Egypt, Saudi Arabia, and Pakistan and has enlisted and sheltered thousands of Arab recruits.” The document also accused Bin Laden of “providing financial support” for the 1992 bombings against US servicemen in Somalia, “at least three terrorist training camps in Sudan” and one in Afghanistan, and the 1993 World Trade Center bombing.

In mid-1996, Bin Laden moved from Sudan to Afghanistan where he lived and operated under the umbrella of the Taliban. From there, he plotted the August 1998 bombings of two American embassies, in Kenya and Tanzania, which killed hundreds and wounded thousands more. In response, President Bill Clinton authorized the first U.S. official attempt to kill him. The problem was how to find him.  While CIA and U.S. military personnel tried to come up with actionable intelligence on his whereabouts, American diplomats in Afghanistan attempted to persuade Bin Laden’s Taliban hosts to give him up.  A State Department cable provided an unusual window into the bizarre negotiations, including recording the suggestion by a Taliban intermediary that the U.S. “arrange for bin Laden to be assassinated” because the Taliban could do nothing to prevent it.

In 1999, Sandia National Laboratories compiled a 400-page profile of Bin Laden – far more comprehensive than the CIA’s brief 1996 sketch, and no doubt reflecting his stratospheric rise in importance to the United States. The report found that the African embassy attacks did not take the U.S. by surprise, given its existing counterterrorism intelligence capabilities.  It added that the retaliatory cruise missile strikes orderd by Clinton – which unfortunately destroyed a Sudanese pharmaceutical plant and killed several suspected terrorists training in Afghanistan instead of their intended targets – “did little to help solve the problem posed by bin Laden and may ultimately prove to have done more harm than good.” The Sandia analysts concluded – chillingly – that the bombings showed “The ‘war’ on terrorism will never be ‘won.’”

On 25 January 2001 the National Security Council’s senior counterterroism adviser, Richard A. Clarke, sent a now-famous memo to incoming National Security Advisor Condoleezza Rice which warned, “al Qida is not some narrow, little terrorist issue that needs to be included in broader regional policy.” The memo referenced the Al Qaeda suicide attack on USS Cole in the Yemeni port of Aden, which killed 17 sailors and injured 39 others.  Clarke recommended that the United States “respond at a time, place, and manner of our own choosing,” pleading, “we urgently need … a Principals level review on the al Qida network [emphasis in original].”

Less than nine months later, nineteen Al Qaeda operative hijacked four planes and struck the World Trade Center and Pentagon.
Sandia National Laboratories, “Osama bin Laden: A Case Study,” December 6, 1999

Between 1996 and the summer of 2001, the United States pressed the Taliban more than 30 times to expel Bin Laden from Afghanistan, according to a July 2001 State Department Report. Two days after the 1998 Cruise missile attack on Bin Laden’s camp, Mullah Omar initiated a phone call to Washington – the U.S. government’s only known direct contact with the Taliban leader – claiming that he did not believe “bin Laden had engaged in or planned any terrorist acts while on Afghan soil,” and that “getting rid” of him “would not end the problems posed to the US by the Islamic world.”

The following month, the President’s Daily Brief included one of the most famous documents that would come out on the Al Qaeda leader – the 6 August 2001 memo entitled “Bin Ladin Determined to Strike in US.” The document was marked “For the President Only” – perhaps a sign of a missed opportunity for intelligence sharing – and stated that FBI information “indicate[d] patterns of suspicious activity in this country consistent with preparations for hijackings or other types of attacks, including recent surveillance of federal buildings in New York.”  In testimony to the 9-11 Commission, Rice insisted that the PDB did not amount to a real warning.  “[It] said nothing about an attack on America,” she testified. “It talked about intentions, about somebody who hated America – well, we knew that.”

Once 9/11 happened, the administration’s attitude lurched about abruptly.  On 13 September 2001, two days after the attacks on New York and Washington, Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage handed Pakistani Intelligence (ISI) Chief Mahmoud a list of seven terse demands, including stopping al-Qaeda at the border, proving blanket landing rights to conduct operations, providing intelligence, and helping the US to “Destroy Usama bin Laden.”

But the stepped-up pressure failed to produce all the desired results, and Pakistan soon became protected territory for the Al Qaeda and the Taliban. Immediately after September 11, according to an unnamed Pakistani security official, “the tribes were overawed by US firepower.” But by the time this quote was made to a senior State Department in Islamabad (reported in an embassy cable on 13 November 2002), “that window had closed.” The Federally Administered Tribal Areas were once again “no go areas.”

Three years later, in late 2005, the situation had not changed.  Despite Pakistan’s formal denials that it was a safe haven for anti-American forces, a State Department Issue Paper for the Vice President confirmed that indeed “some Taliban leaders operate with relative impunity in some Pakistani cities, and may still enjoy support from the lower echelons of Pakistan’s ISI.”

It was because Bin Laden enjoyed this protection in “the sanctuary beyond the reach of [the Afghan or Pakistani governments]” that President Obama on May 1, 2011, ordered a team of Navy SEALs to secretly and unilaterally attack the Al Qaeda leader at his Abbottabad compound. The US government finally succeeded in killing the “terrorist who was responsible for the murder of thousands of innocent men, women, and children” – without the knowledge of its Afghan or Pakistani allies.

TOP-SECRET: U.S. Intelligence Eyes Chinese Research into Space-Age Weapons

Washington, D.C., July 23, 2011 – In 2005, U.S. intelligence agencies monitoring Chinese research into high-power microwave (HPM) and electromagnetic pulse (EMP) radiation speculated that Beijing might be trying to develop a capability to incapacitate Taiwan electronically without triggering a U.S. nuclear retaliation, according to documents published in a major new National Security Archive collection.
Image of the Fukushima Nucelar Power Station from a 1974 Defense Intelligence Agency report (Document 7)

In recent years, China’s development of an assortment of conventional and nuclear weapons has regularly attracted the interest and concern of U.S. policy-makers, intelligence officials, and China watchers.  So has Beijing’s interest in less conventional means of conflict, including cyber-warfare – with Chinese hackers recently linked to or suspected in a number of incidents, notably breaking into highly sensitive U.S. government computer systems (see CBSNews.com, for example).

But cyber-warfare is only one of a number of unconventional approaches to warfare that China has investigated.  A declassified 2005 report from the U.S. National Ground Intelligence Center describing Chinese experiments using HPM and EMP on animals concluded that the real objective was to determine the effects of that radiation on humans.  Analysts did not believe the experiments, which produced “high mortality rates” among the animal subjects, were aimed at developing “antipersonnel” weapons, but they did describe a hypothetical “Taiwan Scenario” in which a lower altitude EMP burst would damage electronics on the island without causing enough human casualties, “either Taiwan[ese] or U.S. military,” to trigger “a U.S. nuclear response.”

Other recently declassified materials describe similar military concerns. A U.S. defense intelligence document from 2001, for example, details Chinese plans for developing radiofrequency weapons (although it stops short of speculating on their possible purpose).  Still others reflect on issues of current interest, for example the risks of constructing nuclear power plants – like the Fukushima facility that exploded after the recent tsunami – at questionable sites in Japan.

These and 2,300 other records are part of a new National Security Archive publication, U.S. Intelligence and China: Collection, Analysis and Covert Action, the latest addition to the “Digital National Security Archive” series published through ProQuest Information and Learning.  A sampling of materials in this important new collection is posted below.

*             *             *             *

The scope of the U.S. Intelligence and China set covers both the People’s Republic and Taiwan, from 1945-2010.  As the materials demonstrate, even before the formation of the PRC in October 1949, the United States targeted China for intelligence collection, hoping to uncover secrets about everything from Communist military capabilities to domestic policies.  The resulting intelligence was not only critical in helping to shape U.S. policy toward the emerging world power, it was also used to guide sensitive covert action operations by the U.S. and Taiwan in the 1950s and 1960s aimed at weakening the Communist regime’s hold on the mainland.

Even the Nationalist regime on Taiwan – a U.S. ally and a collaborator against China – was a target of U.S. intelligence collection efforts.  Against both targets, the United States used a variety of methods, including human sources, signals intelligence, overhead imagery, and other lesser-known techniques.

For years, the results of most of these multifaceted collection efforts against both Mao’s China and Chiang Kai-Shek’s Nationalist forces were kept highly classified.  Now, thanks to the work of two widely recognized intelligence experts – Jeffrey Richelson and Matthew Aid –these important historical records are now available to the public, providing new insights into all aspects of the United States’ intelligence operations against its rival, the People’s Republic, and its ally, Taiwan.

The collection includes new materials from a full array of intelligence entities inside the U.S. government that shed light not only on U.S. intelligence activities but on substantive topics relating to the PRC and Taiwan as well:

1. Foreign policy
2. Military capabilities and intentions
3. Domestic/regime politics and internal conditions
4. Science, technology, and industry
5. Economic conditions

More specifically, the set includes:

1. Estimates and studies of the PRC’s foreign and defense policies, strategic power, scientific  and industrial capabilities, and domestic affairs
2. Biographical information on Chinese military and civilian leaders
3. Studies of the possibility of a PRC-Taiwan clash (whether over islands in the Taiwan Straits or Taiwan itself)
4. Materials discussing Taiwan’s production of conventional arms, and its occasional quest to develop nuclear weapons

Documents

The National Security Archive’s China Intelligence document set contains a wide variety of materials on diverse topics and originating from all corners of the U.S. intelligence community.  The following samples reflect some of this variety:

1)  “Disruption to Shipping in the China Trade Major Problem to Peiping,” in CIA, Office of Current Intelligence, Current Intelligence Review, August 19, 1954, Top Secret Froth, CREST Collection, Document No. CIA-RDP61S00527A000200010070-8, NA, CP. Pages: 2

Early in 1953, President Eisenhower lifted the blockade of Communist China which was subsequently reinitiated by the naval forces of Nationalist China. In the early days of the First Taiwan Straits Crisis the Central Intelligence Agency produced this report that highlighted the economic and political impact of the blockade on Communist China. The report claims increased economic strife and political isolation as a result of limited alternatives (floods washing-out north-south railroads), embarrassing set-backs (seizure of the Polish tanker Tuapse), and the curtailed ability of Eastern European allies to lend assistance.

2)  Memorandum, Smith to Director, Effect on the Chinese Nationalists of a US Refusal to Permit an Attack on the Chinese Mainland, June 21, 1962, Secret, CREST Collection, Document No. CIA-RDP79R00904A000800030018-4, NA, CP. Pages: 3

Following the Taiwan Straits crises of the 1950s, avoiding a war between the two Chinas by ensuring a stable status quo became a U.S. priority. Knowing the desire of Nationalist China to reclaim the mainland, the Central Intelligence Agency analyzed the likely response to U.S. attempts to secure the current stability.  This memorandum highlights probable responses which range from a chilling effect on U.S.-Taiwan relations, a unilateral Nationalist Chinese invasion of mainland China, and a turnover in the government in Taiwan.

3)  Airgram, CA-7647, Department of State to Hong Kong, Health and Behavior of Mao Tse-tung, February 3, 1964, Secret, RG-59, Subject-Numeric Files 1964-1966, POL 15-1 CHICOM, NA, CP. Pages: 1

The Department of State, in an effort to glean human intelligence about the Chinese leadership, forwarded this list of questions to be posed to visitors to China. Specifically, those who came in contact with Mao Tse-tung were to be asked about the specifics of their interactions and any “peculiar physical characteristics” displayed by Mao.

4)  Joint Atomic Intelligence Committee, Memorandum for the Record, Reporting of the Chinese Nuclear Test on 16 October 1964, October 16, 1964, Secret, CIA FOIA. Pages: 1

On October 16, 1964, the People’s Republic of China tested its first nuclear weapon at the Lop Nur site in western China. Communist China became the fifth nation to test a nuclear weapon. Though heavily redacted, this Joint Atomic Intelligence Committee memorandum reports the test and notes the preparation of a public statement for National Security Advisor McGeorge Bundy.

5)  CIA, Intelligence Information Cable, Presence of Chinese Communist Troops in North Vietnam in October 1965, February 18, 1967, classification markings not declassified, CIA FOIA. Pages: 5

Though Communist China was not a major combatant in the U.S. war in Vietnam, the PRC did send anti-aircraft and engineering units into North Vietnam in the 1960s to defend and repair transportation infrastructure. The U.S. intelligence community showed great interest in Chinese involvement and this detailed intelligence cable reveals the activities of Chinese anti-aircraft units stationed in North Vietnam. Strangely, the anti-aircraft units were furnished with small arms, but none of the heavy weapons required to deter airstrikes.

6)  Bureau of Intelligence and Research, Intelligence Note, Denney to Secretary, USSR/China: Soviet and Chinese Forces Clash on the Ussuri River, March 4, 1969, Secret, RG-59, Subject-Numeric Files 1967-1969, Box 1969, POL 32-1 Chicom-USSR, NA, CP. Pages: 6

The ideological Sino-Soviet divide widened in the 1960s and led to a number of border skirmishes, one of which is detailed in this Department of State Bureau of Intelligence and Research intelligence note. In addition to discussing the events that transpired on March 2, 1969, this document discusses some of the broader issues at play in the Sino-Soviet dispute at the time. Manchuria was already heavily militarized by China at the time and the Soviet Union had begun a large troop build-up years earlier. Chinese grievances at the terms of the border treaty and extensive propaganda campaigns against the Soviet Union are discussed alongside an analysis that neither side was interested in provoking a war. A map of the disputed area is also included which highlights the location of the skirmish.

7)  Defense Intelligence Agency, Directorate for Scientific and Technical Agency, Defense Intelligence Report, ST-CS-02-398-74, Nuclear Energy Programs: Japan and Taiwan, September 3, 1974, Secret, Pages: 47

Attempting to curb the spread of nuclear weapons and related technology, the U.S. conducted espionage on its allies in Japan and Taiwan. Though heavily redacted in parts, this document reveals an interesting discussion about the expulsion of the Taiwanese representative from the International Atomic Energy Agency. The report admits that the Taiwanese government could easily bar inspections at its nuclear sites, but allows IAEA teams continued access to facilities. Another interesting portion of the report discusses the potential problems with the siting of nuclear energy reactors in Japan (pages 22, 26-27). In fact, the Fukushima nuclear power complex is pictured in the section dealing with the related issues faced by the Japanese government at the time.

8)  Defense Intelligence Agency, Biographic Sketch, Deng Xiaoping, February 1979, NOFORN, DIA FOIA, Pages: 5

Intelligence on the Chinese leadership often helped guide and inform diplomatic interactions and even broader U.S. strategy towards Communist China. This biographic sketch of Vice Chairman Deng Xiaoping produced by the Defense Intelligence Agency shows the breadth of information collected. Included in the sketch are Deng’s politics, educational background, military service, family, and personality (“energetic,” “abrasive, arrogant”).

9)  Cable, 230716Z OCT 79, AIT TAIPEI to AIT WASHDC, Post-Normalization Taiwan, October 23, 1979, classification markings redacted, Department of State FOIA. Pages: 15

The normalization of relations between the U.S. and People’s Republic of China presented a new challenge to Taiwan and its relationship with the U.S. This cable from the American Institute in Taiwan highlights the impact of normalization on the political power structure in Taiwan. President Chiang Ching-kuo is the locus of the discussion – his governing style, political opposition, and relationship with key institutions: the security apparatus, the armed forces, the party, the technocratic bureaucracy, and the private business community.

10)  National Ground Intelligence Center, Assessment of Chinese Radiofrequency Weapon Capabilities, April 2001, Secret, Pages: 18

This report from the National Ground Intelligence Center is a more technical document as a great deal of time is spent discussing the technology behind radiofrequency weapons. The key determination of this report is that the Chinese have not deployed radiofrequency weapons; however, significant research and development is being conducted on high-power radiofrequency technology that could quickly evolve into a weapons system. In particular, the Chinese are reported to be working on radiofrequency technology designed to disable computer systems and disarm mines.  Additionally, the Chinese military has shown interest in radiofrequency weapons for use in anti-aircraft and anti-satellite operations.

11)  National Ground Intelligence Center, China: Medical Research on Bio-Effects of Electromagnetic Pulse and High-Power Microwave Radiation, August 17, 2005, Secret, Pages: 8

In January 2004, Chinese medical researchers presented research into the biological effects of high-intensity radiation at a public conference in Thailand. Their briefings, despite the basis on animal experiments, revealed great interest in the potential ramifications of human exposure to Electromagnetic Pulse and High-Power Microwave radiation. The report goes on to speculate as to what the implication of this research is on the trajectory and progress of Chinese efforts into developing radiation weapons. Included in the discussion are electromagnetic pulse weapons derived from nuclear and non-nuclear explosions and carbon/graphite-fiber bombs. The speculation largely revolves around the potential impact of such weapons systems in a “Taiwan Scenario” and potential deployment strategies that would minimize the risk of U.S. involvement or prevent nuclear retaliation if a conflict with the U.S. did arise.

12)  Report, Department of Defense, Office of the Secretary of Defense, Annual Report to Congress: Military and Security Developments Involving the People’s Republic of China, 2010, Unclassified, Pages: 83

In 2000, as part of the National Defense Authorization Act, Congress required the Department of Defense to write an annual report assessing the military capabilities, doctrine, strategies and operational concepts of the People’s Republic of China. The 2010 edition of the report presented here discusses military modernization, the Taiwan situation, and bilateral contacts with the U.S. military. A brief section on page 16 details Chinese cyberwarfare developments including reports of computer systems (including U.S. government networks) being targeted by cyberattacks seeking to exfiltrate information of strategic or military value. The brevity and absence of detail could indicate a lack of concrete data: “unclear if these intrusions were conducted by […] the PRC government” – or a topic of heightened, thus closely guarded, concern for the Department of Defense: “developing capabilities for cyberwarfare is consistent with authoritative PLA [People’s Liberation Army] military writings.”

Ministry of Defence fails at redacting nuclear sub secrets- PDF-Panne: Briten veröffentlichen geheime Infos über Atom-U-Boote

Ministry of Defence fails at redacting nuclear sub secrets

The UK’s Ministry of Defence is reported to have failed to correctly redact PDF files it released under the Freedom of Information Act. Redaction is the process of removing classified information from documents; on paper documents, this is done by using a black marker to cross out the text. The reportPDF in question, “SUCCESSOR SSBN – SAFETY REGULATORS ADVICE ON THE SELECTION OF THE PROPULSION POLANT IN SUPPORT OF THE FUTURE DETERRENT REVIEW NOTE” was published as a PDF file on the parliamentary site, the Daily Star revealed the MoD had originally “redacted” the document by changing the background colour of the text to black.

This meant that the document could be read by simply selecting the “redacted” areas and copy-and-pasting the still present text into a text editor. According to Cryptome, the text was also revealed by Google as it automatically scanned the document and converted it into HTML. In this case the document contained information about emergency procedures on UK nuclear submarines and the equivalent procedures on US submarines.

Graham Cluley of Sophos was quoted as asking “If this document is like this, who knows what else is?” The answer came on Sunday when a report in the Daily Telegraph revealed that other documents from the MoD, Department for Trade and Investment, Department of Health and the Department of Communities and Local Government suffered from incorrectly or insufficiently applied redaction. The MoD has started a review of currently published documents to fix the bad redactions. A guide on properly redacting PDF documents is available from Adobe.

 

see pdf here

DEP2011-0648

 

Das britischen Verteidigungsministerium hat versehentlich geheime Informationen über ihre nuklear angetriebene U-Bootflotte ins Netz gestellt, wie das Boulevardblatt Daily Star berichtet. Die Informationen befanden sich in einem PDF-Dokument, das die Behörde selbst auf ihrer Webseite veröffentlicht hat – allerdings in dem Glauben, die vertraulichen Passagen erfolgreich geschwärzt zu haben.

Peinlich: Denn statt die Textstellen aus dem Dokument zu entfernen, hat das Ministerium lediglich die Hintergrundfarbe an den betroffenen Stellen auf Schwarz geändert. Wer wissen wollte, welche Informationen nach Meinung der Behörde zu brisant für die Öffentlichkeit sind, musste die vermeintlich geschwärzten Passagen – laut Daily Star befinden sich ganze Seiten darunter – lediglich mit dem Cursor markieren und in die Zwischenablage kopieren.

An der Geheimhaltung der Informationen hat das Ministerium ein berechtigtes Interesse. So soll sich in dem Dokument eine detaillierte Expertenmeinung darüber befunden haben, welche Umstände eine Kernschmelze an Bord eines britischen Atom-U-Boots auslösen können. Auch Informationen über U-Boote der USA sollen in dem Dokument zu finden gewesen sein. Das Verteidigungsministerium hat sich bei dem Magazin für seine Entdeckung bedankt und das Dokument gegen eine korrekt geschwärzte Fassung ausgetauscht. Wie man Informationen zuverlässig schwärzt, verrät Adobe in seinem Blog.

SECRET: ORGANIZED CRIME IN IRELAND (C-CN5-00417)

C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 DUBLIN 001196 
 
SIPDIS 
 
E.O. 12958: DECL: 10/27/2014 
TAGS: PINR PREL PTER
SUBJECT: ORGANIZED CRIME IN IRELAND (C-CN5-00417) 
 
REF: SECSTATE 146246 
 
Classified By: POL/ECON CHIEF MARY DALY, FOR REASONS 1.4 (B), (D) 
 
1. (C)  Summary.  It is unlikely that there is large scale 
involvement of non-nationals in organized crime activities in 
the Republic of Ireland.  According to the EU's 2004 
Organized Crime Report, Ireland is unique in that its 
organized criminal elements are comprised almost entirely of 
Irish nationals, most of whom are known to each other.  Any 
involvement they may have with foreign criminals is suspected 
of taking place outside of the country.  End summary. 
 
2. (C)  The following answers are keyed to reftel questions: 
 
A.  Are there organized crime groups present in the host 
country that originated in the following countries? 
 
Russia, Ukraine, Italy, The Balkans (Albania, Serbia, 
Bosnia), Japan, Greater China (China, Hong Kong, Macau, or 
Taiwan), or West Africa?  What is the extent or nature of 
their presence? 
 
--According to Criminal Assets Bureau Detective Inspector 
Denis O'Leary, if there is any organized criminal activity in 
Ireland of Ukrainian, Russian, Chinese, and Nigerian 
nationals, it would likely take place in terms of involvement 
in their respective ethnic migrant communities.  Irish 
nationals are the primary suspects in organized crime in 
Ireland.  According to the 2004 European Union Organized 
Crime Report (EUOCR), non-Irish involvement occurs mainly 
outside of Ireland, principally with contacts of Irish 
criminals living abroad. 
 
B.  What types of criminal activity are these groups engaged 
in?  What is the economic impact of the criminal activity? 
 
--There is little evidence that these groups operate in 
Ireland.  However, it is suspected that domestic groups may 
network with foreign organizations abroad to source narcotics 
for Ireland. 
 
--According to the EUOCR, domestic organized crime groups 
engage primarily in drug trafficking, and to a lesser extent, 
cigarettes.  The most common types of drugs smuggled into 
Ireland are cocaine, heroin, and cannabis.  The main suspects 
in the smuggling of cannabis and cocaine are Irish nationals 
residing in Spain. Likewise, Irish nationals residing in the 
UK are suspected of organizing the heroin trade into the 
Republic.  Ecstasy, another drug on the rise, is sourced 
mainly through Irish criminals residing in Holland. 
 
--According to O'Leary and Gerardine Rowley of Ruhama (an NGO 
involved in the rehabilitation of prostitutes and victims of 
trafficking) there is anecdotal evidence that the 
above-mentioned foreign groups operate in Ireland.  These 
groups are suspected of having low-scale involvement in human 
trafficking, but there has yet to be a successful linkage to 
these groups in such cases. 
 
C.  What front companies do the groups use?  What 
relationship, if any, is there between the criminal groups 
listed above and crime groups indigenous to the host country? 
Are there indications that the groups listed above cooperate 
with each other or other international criminals? 
 
The EU Organized Crime Report suggests that Ireland is unique 
among European countries, in that organized crime elements in 
Ireland are Irish, know each other and cooperate in efforts, 
therefore creating a monopoly. 
 
D.  Are there indications of links or connections between 
these groups and terrorist organizations in the host country? 
 
There are no indications that these groups play a prominent 
role in Ireland.  The IRA, the Continuity IRA (CIRA), and the 
Real IRA (RIRA) are terrorist groups.  However, the IRA 
announced July 28, 2005 that it would lay down its arms.  On 
September 26, the Independent International Commission on 
Decommissioning confirmed the IRA had put its arsenal of 
weapons, explosives and ammunition beyond use.  Each of these 
groups is suspected of being heavily involved in organized 
crime.  Any connection to the above-mentioned foreign groups 
is tenuous and would suggest associations outside of Ireland. 
 
 
E.  Is there evidence of corrupt relationships between these 
groups and host country businessmen or government officials? 
What is the nature of these relationships? If possible, 
please provide examples of these crime groups coercing 
business or government officials. 
 
There is no evidence of corrupt relationships between the 
foreign organized crime groups mentioned in para A and Irish 
businessmen or officials. 
KENNY

CONFIDENTIAL: INVESTMENT CLIMATE STATEMENT – IRELAND



VZCZCXRO3307
RR RUEHIK
DE RUEHDL #0060/01 0201354
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 201354Z JAN 06
FM AMEMBASSY DUBLIN
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 6379
INFO RUCNMEM/EU MEMBER STATES
RUEATRS/DEPT OF TREASURY WASHDC
RUCPDOC/USDOC WASHDC
RUCPCIM/CIMS NTDB WASHDC
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 14 DUBLIN 000060 
 
SIPDIS 
 
SIPDIS 
 
STATE FOR EB/IFD/OIA 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: EINV EFIN USTR ECON KTDB OPIC EI
SUBJECT: INVESTMENT CLIMATE STATEMENT 2006 - IRELAND 
 
REF: 05 STATE 202943 
 
DUBLIN 00000060  001.2 OF 014 
 
 
The following is keyed to reftel. 
 
A1. OPENNESS TO FOREIGN INVESTMENT 
---------------------------------- 
 
IRISH GOVERNMENT'S ATTITUDE TOWARDS FOREIGN INVESTMENT 
 
1.   Over the past twenty years, the Irish Government has 
actively promoted foreign direct investment (FDI), a strategy 
that has underpinned unprecedented economic growth during 
this "Celtic Tiger" period.  FDI flows into Ireland increased 
from an annual average of USD 140 million in the mid-1980s to 
USD 2.7 billion per year in the second half of the 1990s, 
yielding a total FDI stock of USD 213 billion by 2004. 
Traditionally, the principal goal of investment promotion has 
been employment creation, especially in technology-intensive 
and high-skill industries.  In recent years, the Irish 
Government has also supported efforts by foreign-invested 
companies to sustain their international competitiveness 
through R&D enhancements and the marketing/sales of 
higher-value goods and services. 
 
2.  The Irish Government's actions have had considerable 
success in attracting U.S. foreign investment.  According to 
the U.S. Department of Commerce, U.S. investment flow into 
Ireland in 2004 was USD 10.4 billion, roughly one-tenth the 
U.S. total for the EU.  Ireland received USD 3.4 billion in 
U.S. manufacturing investment flow in 2004 and was the third 
most attractive market in the world for this category of U.S. 
investment behind the United Kingdom (USD 13.2 billion) and 
Canada (USD 5.5 billion).  The stock of U.S. investment in 
Ireland in 2004 was valued at USD 73 billion, roughly five 
times the amount of U.S. investment stock in China (USD 15.4 
billion).  There are roughly 620 U.S. firms in Ireland, 
directly employing over 90,000 workers and supporting work 
for approximately 250,000, an eighth of the total labor 
force.  U.S. firms operate primarily in the following 
sectors: chemicals; bio-pharmaceuticals and healthcare; 
computer hardware and software; electronics; and, financial 
services.  In 2005, Ireland also emerged as a magnet for U.S. 
internet/digital media investment, with industry leaders 
Yahoo, Google, and Amazon making Dublin the hub of their 
respective European operations. 
 
3.  The American Chamber of Commerce reports that U.S. 
companies are attracted to Ireland as an export platform to 
the EU.  In 2004, Irish-based U.S. firms exported roughly USD 
55 billion worth of goods and services, mostly destined for 
the EU market.  Other reasons for Ireland's attractiveness as 
an FDI destination include: a 12.5 percent rate of corporate 
tax; the quality and flexibility of the English-speaking work 
force; cooperative labor relations; political stability; 
pro-business government policies; a transparent judicial 
system; and, the pulling power of existing companies 
operating successfully in Ireland (a "bandwagon" effect). 
Factors that negatively affect Ireland's ability to attract 
investment include: increasing costs of skilled and unskilled 
labor (especially when compared to low-cost countries such as 
China and India), inadequate infrastructure (particularly in 
the transportation, internet/broadband, and energy sectors), 
and absolute price levels that are ranked the highest in 
Europe. 
 
4.  Four state organizations promote inward investment into 
Ireland by foreign companies: 
 
-   The Industrial Development Authority of Ireland (IDA 
Ireland) has overall responsibility for promoting and 
facilitating foreign direct investment in all areas of the 
country, except the Shannon Free Zone.  IDA Ireland is also 
responsible for attracting foreign companies to   Dublin's 
International Financial Services Center (IFSC).  IDA Ireland 
maintains offices in New York, Boston, Chicago, San Jose, and 
Atlanta, as well as in Europe and Asia; 
 
-   Enterprise Ireland promotes joint ventures and strategic 
alliances between indigenous and foreign companies; 
 
-   Shannon Free Airport Development Co. (SFADCO) handles 
investment in the Shannon Free Zone and is generally 
responsible for economic development in the Shannon region. 
The Irish Government is in the process of folding SFADCO's 
functions into IDA Ireland, which will require legislative 
action; 
 
-   Udaras na Gaeltachta has responsibility for economic 
 
DUBLIN 00000060  002.2 OF 014 
 
 
development in those areas of Ireland where Irish (Gaelic) is 
the predominant language, and works with IDA Ireland to 
promote overseas investment in these regions. 
 
5.  Major Laws/Rules/Taxation Policy 
 
Ireland's judicial system is transparent and upholds the 
sanctity of contracts as well as laws affecting foreign 
investment.  These laws include: 
 
-  The Industrial Development Act of 1993, which outlines the 
functions of IDA Ireland; 
 
-  The Mergers, Takeovers and Monopolies Control Act of 1978, 
which sets out rules governing mergers and takeovers by 
foreign and domestic companies; 
 
- The Competition (Amendment) Act of 1996, which amends and 
extends the Competition Act of 1991 and the Mergers and 
Takeovers (Control) Acts of 1978 and 1987, and sets out the 
rules governing competitive behavior; 
 
-  The Companies Act of 1963, which contains the basic 
requirements for incorporation in Ireland (amended in 1990); 
and, 
 
-  The 2004 Finance Act, which introduced tax incentives to 
encourage firms to set up headquarters in Ireland and to 
conduct R&D. 
 
In addition, there are numerous laws and regulations 
pertaining to employment, social security, environmental 
protection and taxation, with many of these determined at the 
EU level. 
 
6.  One of Ireland's most attractive features as an FDI 
destination is the low corporate tax rate.  Since January 1, 
2003, the corporate tax rate for both foreign and domestic 
firms has been 12.5 percent.  Existing foreign firms will 
retain their entitlement to the "old" 10 percent rate until 
2010 in the case of manufacturing and certain internationally 
traded services.  Ireland's corporate tax rate is among the 
lowest in the EU, and the Irish Government continues to 
oppose proposals to harmonize taxes at a single EU rate.  In 
2004, U.S. firms in Ireland paid euro 2.7 billion in tax to 
the Irish Government. 
 
7.  All firms incorporated in Ireland are treated on an equal 
basis.  With only a few exceptions, there are no constraints 
preventing foreign individuals or entities from ownership or 
participation in private firms/corporations.  The most 
significant of these exceptions is that, as with other EU 
countries, Irish airlines must be at least 50 percent-owned 
by EU residents in order to have full access to the single 
European aviation market.  There are also requirements 
related to the purchase of agricultural lands (see below). 
 
8.  While Ireland does not have a formal privatization 
program, there is likely to be at least partial privatization 
of some state-owned companies over the coming years.  In 
2005, for example, the Government announced its intention to 
privatize Aer Lingus, the state-owned national airline. 
There are no barriers to participation by foreign 
institutions in the sale of Irish state-owned companies. 
Residents of Ireland, however, may be given priority in share 
allocations to retail investors, as was the case with the 
state-owned telecommunications company, Eircom, privatized in 
1998. 
 
9.  Citizens of countries other than Ireland and other EU 
member states can acquire land for private residential 
purposes and for industrial purposes.  Under Section 45 of 
the Land Act, 1965, all non-EU nationals must obtain the 
written consent of the Land Commission before acquiring an 
interest in agricultural land, though there are many stud 
farms and racing facilities in Ireland that are owned by 
foreign nationals.  There are no restrictions on the 
acquisition of urban land. 
 
10.  There is no formal screening process for foreign 
investment in Ireland, though investors looking to receive 
Government grants or assistance through one of the four state 
agencies responsible for promoting foreign investment in 
Ireland are often required to meet certain employment and 
investment criteria (see section "D" below).  These screening 
mechanisms are transparent and do not impede investment, 
limit competition, or protect domestic interests.  Potential 
investors are also required to examine the environmental 
 
DUBLIN 00000060  003.2 OF 014 
 
 
impact of the proposed project and to meet with Irish 
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) officials. 
 
 
A.2. Conversion and Transfer Policies 
------------------------------------- 
 
11.  Ireland enjoys full current and capital account 
liberalization.   There are no restrictions or reported 
significant delays in the conversion or repatriation of 
investment capital, earnings, interest, or royalties, nor are 
there any plans to change remittance policies.  Likewise, 
there are no limitations on the import of capital into 
Ireland.  Foreign exchange is easily obtainable at market 
rates.  In 2004, the Irish Financial Services Regulatory 
Authority (IFSRA) reported that the Allied Irish Bank (AIB) 
had knowingly overcharged on foreign exchange transactions 
for several years.  AIB repaid the overcharged amount and 
conducted an internal disciplinary process.  The euro is 
Ireland's national currency. 
 
 
A.3. Expropriation and Compensation 
----------------------------------- 
 
12.  Private property is normally expropriated only for 
public purposes in a non-discriminatory manner and in 
accordance with established principles of international law. 
State condemnations of private property are carried out in 
accordance with recognized principles of due process.  Where 
there are disputes between owners of private property subject 
to a government taking, the Irish courts provide a system of 
judicial review and appeal. 
 
13.  In 2005, the only reported case of expropriatory action 
involving the property/facilities of U.S. investors was that 
of the Lusitania, the ship that was sunk off Ireland's 
southern coast in 1915 by a German submarine and which is 
owned by a U.S. citizen.  The U.S. owner has attempted for 
ten years to secure his right of access to the vessel and in 
2001 brought action against the Government in the Irish 
courts after his applications for a license to dive to the 
vessel were denied.  In 2005, a High Court ruling in the case 
noted that "the State simply cannot directly or indirectly 
expropriate this property from (the owner), or totally, or 
even substantially deny him access to or the use of his 
property or any part or parts of his property, even under 
color of merely regulating that access or use for the purpose 
of safeguarding a national asset, without paying appropriate 
compensation."  The Irish Government has appealed the ruling, 
as the two sides continue to discuss a possible license for 
an exploratory dive. 
 
A.4. Dispute Settlement 
----------------------- 
 
14.  Ireland has no specific domestic laws governing 
investment disputes with foreign firms.  There is, however, a 
legal arbitration framework available to parties that opt to 
arbitrate a dispute, including investment disputes, rather 
than litigate the case.  Currently, there are no disputes 
involving investments by U.S. firms either in arbitration or 
litigation.  In recent years, however, U.S. business 
representatives have occasionally called into question the 
transparency of government tenders, some of which have been 
won by U.S. companies.  Some U.S. firms claim that lengthy 
budgetary decisions delay procurements and that unsuccessful 
bidders often have difficulty receiving information on the 
rationale behind the tender outcome.   Successful bidders 
have experienced delays in finalizing contracts, commencing 
work on major projects, obtaining accurate project data, and 
receiving compensation for work completed, including through 
conciliation and arbitration processes.  Successful bidders 
have also subsequently found that the original tenders do not 
accurately describe conditions on the ground. 
 
15.  The Irish legal system is based on common law, 
legislation and the constitution.  The Companies Act 1963 
(amended 1990) is the most important body of law dealing with 
commercial and bankruptcy law and is applied consistently by 
the courts.  Irish bankruptcy laws give creditors a strong 
degree of protection.  The Department of Enterprise, Trade 
and Employment is the state agency with primary 
responsibility for drafting and enforcing company law.  The 
judiciary is independent, and litigants are entitled to trial 
by jury in commercial disputes.  Ireland is a member of the 
International Center for the Settlement of Investment 
Disputes, and the Irish Government has been willing to agree 
 
DUBLIN 00000060  004.2 OF 014 
 
 
to binding international arbitration of investment disputes 
between foreign investors and the state.  Ireland is also a 
party to the New York Convention of 1958 on the Recognition 
and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards.  There is no 
specific domestic body for handling investment disputes. 
 
 
A.5. Performance Requirements/Incentives 
---------------------------------------- 
 
16.  The Irish Government does not maintain any measures that 
it has notified the WTO to be inconsistent with Trade-Related 
Investment Measures (TRIMs) requirements.  Moreover, there 
have been no allegations that the Government maintains 
measures that violate the WTO's TRIMs text. 
 
17.  Three Irish organizations, SFADCO, IDA Ireland, and 
Udaras, have regulatory authority for administering grant aid 
to investors for capital equipment, land, buildings, 
training, R&D, etc.  Business enterprises in Ireland, 
including overseas companies, which seek grant aid from these 
organizations must submit investment proposals.  Typically, 
these proposals include information on fixed assets 
(capital), labor, and technology/R&D components and establish 
targets using criteria such as sales, profitability, exports, 
and employment.  This information is treated in confidence by 
the organizations, and each investment proposal is subject to 
an economic appraisal prior to approval for support.  In 
2004, IDA Ireland paid out euro 66 million in grants to 
foreign firms. 
 
18.  Performance requirements are generally based on 
employment creation targets established between the state 
investment agencies and foreign investors.  Grant aid is paid 
out only after externally audited performance targets have 
been attained.  Generally, parent companies must guarantee 
repayment of the government grant if the company closes 
before an agreed period of time elapses, normally ten years 
after the grant has been paid.  Grant agreements generally 
have a term of five years after the date on which the last 
grant is paid.  There are no requirements that foreign 
investors purchase from local sources or allow nationals to 
own shares. 
 
19.   As a result of "Agenda 2000" EU budgetary reforms, 
since 2000 Ireland has been treated as two regions for the 
purpose of EU structural funding and maximum "regional aid." 
Under the new rules, maximum grant aid assistance (40 percent 
of capital investment) is only available to companies 
locating in the 13 "Objective 1" border, midland and western 
(BMW) counties of Ireland, where infrastructure is less 
developed.  Companies locating in the remaining 15 counties 
in the more prosperous south and east are entitled to 
restricted grant aid up to a maximum of 17.5 percent to 20 
percent of their capital investment, depending on location. 
For the period 2004-2006, the following ceilings apply: 
 
Transition Regions            Percent of Capital Investment 
 
-- Southeast                             20 
 
-- Mid-West                              20 
 
-- Southwest                             20 
 
-- Mid-East                              18 
 
-- Dublin                                17.5 
 
Objective 1 Region 
 
-- Border, Midlands, West                40 
 
The current Regional Aid Guidelines (RAGs) will cease to 
operate at the end of 2006, and the EU Commission is now 
developing new RAGs for the period 2007-2013.  It is expected 
that these new rates will be lower than the current rates. 
 
20.  While investors are free, subject to planning 
considerations, to choose the location of their investment, 
IDA Ireland has since the late 1990s differentiated grant aid 
levels in favor of regions outside Dublin.  This linkage is 
consistent with the National Spatial Strategy, which was 
adopted in 2001 with the aim of spreading investment more 
evenly around the country.  One of the strategy's stated 
goals was to direct 50 percent of all new jobs related to 
greenfield investment to the border, midlands, and western 
(BMW) counties of Ireland, where the economy is less 
 
DUBLIN 00000060  005.2 OF 014 
 
 
developed.  In 1999, roughly 25 percent of jobs related to 
greenfield investment were located in the BMW region; by 
2004, this figure had grown to 41 percent.  In 2005, 46 of 71 
new investment projects negotiated by the IDA were slated for 
areas outside Dublin.  To encourage client firms to locate 
outside Dublin, IDA Ireland has developed "magnets of 
attraction," including: a Cross Border Business Park linking 
Letterkenny and Derry, a regional Data Center in Limerick, 
and the National Microelectronics Research Center in Cork. 
 
 
21.   There are no restrictions, de jure or de facto, on 
participation by foreign firms in government-financed and/or 
subsidized R&D programs on a national basis.  In fact, the 
government encourages multinational companies to undertake 
more R&D in Ireland.  Science Foundation Ireland (SFI), the 
state science agency, is responsible for administering a euro 
365 million R&D fund under the 2000-2006 National Development 
Plan.  The fund targets leading researchers in Ireland and 
overseas to promote within Ireland the development of 
biotechnology and information/communications technology, as 
well as complementary worker skills.  Under the 2004 Finance 
Act, moreover, a credit of 20 percent of the incremental 
expenditure on revenue items, royalties, plant, and machinery 
related to R&D can be offset against a company's corporation 
tax liability in the year in which it is incurred.  The 2006 
Irish Government budget also allocates euro 300 million to a 
new Strategic Innovation Fund, that will encompass R&D links 
between industry and academia.  In 2005, Microsoft, Lucent, 
Xilinx, Bristol-Meyers Squibb, Pfizer, and Genzyme, among 
other firms, launched investments in R&D projects and 
facilities. 
 
22.   Visa, residence, and work permit procedures for foreign 
investors are non-discriminatory and, for U.S. investors, 
generally liberal.  There are no restrictions on the numbers 
and duration of employment of foreign managers brought in to 
supervise foreign investment projects, though their work 
permits must be renewed yearly.  There are no discriminatory 
export policies or import policies affecting foreign 
investors. 
 
A.6. Right to Private Ownership and Establishment 
--------------------------------------------- ---- 
 
23.  The most common form of business organization in Ireland 
is the incorporated company, limited by shares, registered 
under the Companies Act, 1963, or previous legislation. 
Irish law does not prevent foreign corporations from carrying 
on business in Ireland.  Any company incorporated abroad that 
establishes a branch must, however, file certain papers with 
the Registrar of Companies.  A foreign corporation with a 
branch in Ireland will have the same standing in Irish law 
for purposes of contracts, etc., as a company incorporated in 
Ireland.  Private businesses are not at a competitive 
disadvantage to public enterprises with respect to access to 
markets, credit, and other business operations. 
 
24.  Before 1999, Irish company law differed from 
international norms by allowing, for tax purposes, the 
registration of companies in Ireland that were not actually 
resident in Ireland (so-called Irish Registered Non-Resident 
companies (IRNRs)).  In response to concern that a large 
number of the estimated 40,000 IRNRs were engaged in fraud, 
tax evasion, money laundering, and other illegal activities, 
the 1999 Finance Act equated registration in Ireland with tax 
residence and liability for all companies except in limited 
circumstances.  Exceptions include cases where the Irish 
company, or a related parent company, is carrying on trade in 
Ireland, and the company is ultimately controlled either by 
residents of an EU member state or by residents of a country 
with which Ireland has a tax treaty (including the United 
States).  Nonetheless, all Irish-based companies, including 
U.S. firms, claiming non-residence in Ireland because of tax 
treaty provisions must identify the beneficial owners of the 
company. 
 
25.   Similarly, the "Companies (Amendment) (No. 2) Act 1999" 
requires that every application for company registration in 
Ireland show the manner in which the proposed company will 
carry out activities in Ireland.  Section 43 of the 
legislation stipulates that a company must either have a 
director resident in the State or provide a bond of euro 
25,400 in the event that the company commits an offense under 
the Companies Act or tax legislation.  Section 44 states that 
these requirements may be waived when the Company obtains a 
certificate from the Companies Office stating that the 
company has a real and continuous link with one or more 
 
DUBLIN 00000060  006.2 OF 014 
 
 
economic activities in Ireland.  Like the 1999 Finance Act, 
the Companies Act is designed to prevent the use of IRNRs for 
exclusively foreign activities without any connection to 
Ireland. 
 
 
A.7. Protection of Property Rights 
---------------------------------- 
 
(I) Real Property 
 
26.   Secured interests in property, both chattel and real 
estate, are recognized and enforced.  The Department of 
Justice administers a reliable system of recording such 
security interests through the Land Registry and Registry of 
Deeds.  An efficient, non-discriminatory legal system is 
accessible to foreign investors to protect and facilitate 
acquisition and disposition of all property rights. 
 
(II) Intellectual Property Rights 
 
27.   Ireland is a member of the World Intellectual Property 
Organization and a party to the International Convention for 
the Protection of Intellectual Property.  In July 2000, Irish 
President McAleese signed legislation bringing Irish 
intellectual property rights (IPR) law into compliance with 
Ireland's obligations under the WTO Trade-Related 
Intellectual Property Treaty (TRIPs).  The legislation came 
into force on January 1, 2001, and gives Ireland one of the 
most comprehensive legal frameworks for IPR protection in 
Europe. 
 
28.  This legislation addressed several TRIPs inconsistencies 
in previous Irish IPR law that had concerned foreign 
investors, including the absence of a rental right for sound 
recordings, the lack of an "anti-bootlegging" provision, and 
low criminal penalties that failed to deter piracy.  The new 
legislation includes provisions for stronger penalties on 
both the civil and criminal sides. 
 
29.  As part of this comprehensive copyright legislation, 
changes were also made to revise the non-TRIPs conforming 
sections of Irish patent law.  Specifically, the new IPR 
legislation addresses two concerns of many foreign investors 
in the previous legislation: 
 
- the compulsory licensing provisions of the previous 1992 
Patent Law were inconsistent with the "working" requirement 
prohibition of TRIPs Articles 27.1 and the general compulsory 
licensing provisions of Article 31; and, 
 
- applications processed after December 20, 1991, did not 
conform to the non-discrimination requirement of TRIPs 
Article 27.1. 
 
30.  DVD and CD piracy, however, continues to be a problem. 
In 2004, the Irish police seized 130,000 pirated DVDs, valued 
at approximately euro 3 million, and 42,150 pirated CDs, 
valued at roughly euro 756,000.  In a June 2005 raid, police 
in County Meath confiscated 8,000 pirated DVDs and machinery 
that could produce 600 DVDs an hour.  Industry 
representatives note that pirated DVDs make up at least 60 
percent of the DVD rental market and that light penalties 
given to counterfeiters in DVD piracy court cases hamper 
police enforcement efforts.  Moreover, industry sources 
estimate that up to 38 percent of PC software used in Ireland 
is pirated.  The Business Software Alliance in Ireland 
estimates that reducing this rate by ten percentage points 
would help the USD 2.6 billion domestic IT industry to grow 
to USD 4 billion by 2009. 
 
 
A.8. Transparency of the Regulatory System 
------------------------------------------ 
 
31.  The Irish Government generally employs a transparent and 
effective policy framework that fosters competition between 
private businesses in a non-discriminatory fashion.  While 
ongoing Irish judicial "Tribunals" are investigating possible 
links between indigenous Irish companies' political donations 
in the late 1980s and favorable government decisions, U.S. 
businesses can, in general, expect to receive national 
treatment in their dealings with the Government.  There is no 
report of any U.S. firm or investor having being required or 
forced to make payments during that period. 
 
32.  In recent years, independent bodies have taken over 
regulatory powers from Cabinet Departments in key economic 
 
DUBLIN 00000060  007.2 OF 014 
 
 
sectors.  The Commission for Communications Regulation and 
the Commission for Energy Regulation are responsible for 
regulating the communications and energy sectors, 
respectively.  Both are independent bodies with institutional 
links to the Department of Communications, the Marine and 
Natural Resources.  The Commission for Aviation Regulation is 
an independent body that regulates the aviation sector.  It 
is institutionally linked to the Department of Transport, 
which has direct regulatory powers over other segments of the 
transportation sector. 
 
33.  The Competition (Amendment) Act 1996 amends and extends 
the Competition Act 1991, strengthens the enforcement power 
of the Competition Authority, introduces criminal liability, 
increases corporate liability, and outlines available 
defenses.  Most tax, labor, environment, health and safety, 
and other laws are compatible with European Union 
regulations, and they do not adversely affect investment. 
Proposed laws and regulations are published in draft form for 
public comment, including by foreign firms and their 
representative associations.  Bureaucratic procedures are 
transparent and reasonably efficient, in line with a general 
pro-business climate espoused by the Government. 
 
A.9. Efficient Capital Markets and Portfolio Investment 
--------------------------------------------- ---------- 
 
34.  Capital markets and portfolio investments operate 
freely, and there is no discrimination between Irish and 
foreign firms.  In some instances, development authorities 
and banks are able to facilitate loan packages to foreign 
firms with favorable credit terms.  Credit is allocated on 
market terms, although the Irish Competition Authority found 
in 2004 that the banking sector's lack of competition limited 
the amount of credit available to small and medium-sized 
firms.  Irish legal, regulatory, and accounting systems are 
transparent and consistent with international norms and 
provide a secure environment for portfolio investment.  The 
Capital Gains Tax rate is 20 percent.  The Irish banking 
system is sound.  The estimated total assets of all licensed 
credit institutions as of December 2005 stood at euro 911.4 
billion, with the Bank of Ireland and Allied Irish Banks 
holding a combined 25 percent of total assets.  According to 
the Central Bank, non-performing loans comprised 0.76 percent 
of total assets.  U.S. banks operating in Ireland include 
Citibank and Chase Manhattan. 
 
35.  As of January 2006, total market capitalization in the 
Irish Stock Exchange (ISEQ) was euro 95.1 billion, roughly 59 
percent of projected 2005 nominal GDP (euro 159.9 billion). 
In terms of market weight, the stocks of four companies are 
predominant: Allied Irish Bank, Bank of Ireland, CRH (a 
construction industry supplier), and Elan (a pharmaceuticals 
firm).  The Irish stock market has recovered steadily since 
plummeting in 2002 following the global economic slowdown and 
well-publicized management problems at several major Irish 
companies.  In 2005, the ISEQ Overall Index saw 20 percent 
growth and reached an all-time high by year's end, one of the 
strongest performances in the developed world.  Economists 
attribute ISEQ's robust showing to Ireland's broad-based 
economic growth, the likely under-valuing of Irish stocks 
earlier in the decade, and improved prospects for the 
European economy.  In 2005, ISEQ opened up a secondary 
market, the Irish Enterprise Exchange (IEX), which caters to 
smaller firms with a minimum market cap of euro 5 million. 
 
36.  In May 2003, the Central Bank of Ireland was reorganized 
into the Central Bank and Financial Services Authority of 
Ireland (CBFSAI), in accord with the Central Bank and 
Financial Services Authority of Ireland Act 2003.  Under the 
legislation, the Governor of the CBFSAI has responsibility 
for the overall stability of the Irish financial system.  The 
legislation also established the Irish Financial Services 
Regulatory Authority (IFSRA), which is an autonomous but 
constituent part of CBFSAI that regulates financial services 
institutions in Ireland and, from 2006, the Irish Stock 
Exchange.  IFSRA took over this responsibility from a mix of 
government bodies, including: the Central Bank, the 
Department of Trade, Enterprise, and Employment (DETE), the 
Office of Director of Consumer Affairs, and Registrar of 
Friendly Societies.  The legislation also enhanced the 
regulatory powers given to IFSRA, particularly in consumer 
protection. 
 
37.  With the advent of Economic and Monetary Union (EMU), 
the Central Bank is now a member of the European System of 
Central Banks (ESCB) whose primary objective is to maintain 
price stability in the euro area.  Ireland no longer operates 
 
DUBLIN 00000060  008.2 OF 014 
 
 
an independent monetary policy.  Rather, ESCB formulates and 
implements monetary policy for the euro area, and the Central 
Bank implements that policy at the national level.  The 
Governor of the Central Bank is one of 18 members of the 
Governing Council for the ECB and has an equal say in the 
formulation of monetary and interest rate policy.  The other 
main tasks of the Central Bank include: issuing euro currency 
in Ireland; acting as manager of the official external 
reserves of gold and foreign currency; conducting research 
and analysis on economic and financial matters; overseeing 
the domestic payment and settlement systems; and, managing 
investment assets on behalf of the State. 
 
38.  The Irish Takeover Panel Act 1997 governs company 
takeovers.  Under the Act, the "Takeover Panel" issues 
guidelines, or "Takeover Rules," which aim to regulate 
commercial behaviour in the context of mergers and takeovers. 
 According to minority squeeze-out provisions in the 
legislation, a bidder who holds 80 percent of the shares of 
the target company can compel the remaining minority 
shareholders to sell their shares.  There are no reports that 
the legislation has been used to prevent foreign takeovers 
specifically, and, in fact, there have been several 
high-profile foreign takeovers of Irish companies in the 
banking and telecommunications sectors in recent years.  The 
EU Directive on Takeovers provides a framework of common 
principles for cross-border takeover bids, creates a level 
playing field for shareholders, and establishes disclosure 
obligations throughout the EU.  The Directive is to be 
implemented in Ireland in 2006, though many of its principles 
have already been enacted in the Irish Takeover Panel Act 
1997. 
 
 
A. 10. Political Violence 
------------------------- 
 
(I) Impact of Northern Ireland Instability 
 
39.   In the past, political instability and violence in 
Northern Ireland were thought to affect the Republic of 
Ireland.  In reality, however, there has been little 
spillover of violence or instability, especially since the 
late 1970s and particularly after the cease-fires of 1994. 
The growth of business investment and confidence in Northern 
 Ireland since the cessation of widespread violence has 
benefited the Republic of Ireland, with cross-border trade 
reaching nearly euro 2.5 billion in 2004.  No violence 
related to the situation in Northern Ireland has been 
specifically directed at U.S. citizens or firms located in 
the South. 
 
40.  The 1998 ratification of the Good Friday Agreement by 
large majorities in both Ireland and Northern Ireland has 
further diminished the potential for violence.  Since then, 
however, groups opposed to the peace process have continued 
to commit acts of criminality and terror in Northern Ireland 
and on mainland Britain.  There have been no serious 
incidents in the Republic of Ireland.  In mid-2005, the Irish 
Republican Army announced that it would no longer pursue its 
objectives through violent means.  Independent observers 
subsequently confirmed the decommissioning of IRA weapons. 
Efforts in pursuit of a final peace agreement, including 
restoration of cross-community participation in local 
government, were set to continue into 2006. 
 
(II) Other Acts of Political Violence 
 
41.  In 1997 and 1998, an Irish environmental group 
vandalized two separate Irish crop trial sites, involving 
agricultural biotechnology crops.  The trials were conducted 
by the U.S. firm, Monsanto.  Irish police investigated both 
incidents and criminal charges were filed in both cases. 
There have been no further incidents involving subsequent GMO 
plant trials in Ireland. 
 
42.  There have been no other recent incidents involving 
politically motivated damage to foreign investment projects 
and/or installations in the Republic of Ireland.  In 2003, 
several Irish citizens opposed to the Iraq War damaged U.S. 
military assets at Shannon Airport.  In 2004, one of these 
citizens was convicted in an Irish court and given a 
suspended sentence.  The trial of the other citizens involved 
in these acts is pending for 2006.  In late 2005, a group of 
opposition and independent Irish parliamentarians said 
publicly that they would not oppose further attacks on U.S. 
military aircraft transiting Ireland. 
 
 
DUBLIN 00000060  009.2 OF 014 
 
 
A. 11. a. Corruption 
-------------------- 
 
43.   Corruption is not a serious problem for foreign 
investors in Ireland.  The principal Irish legislation 
relating to anti-bribery and corruption includes the Public 
Bodies Corrupt Practices Act 1889, the Prevention of 
Corruption Act 1906, the Prevention of Corruption Act 1916, 
and the Prevention of Corruption (Amendment) Act 2001.  This 
body of law makes it illegal for Irish public servants to 
accept bribes.  The Ethics in Public Office Act 1995 provides 
for the written annual disclosure of interests of people 
holding public office or employment. 
 
44.    Ireland signed the UN Convention on Corruption in 
December 2003, and ratification is pending a review of the 
legal measures required for implementation.  In January 2000, 
the GOI introduced to Parliament the "Prevention of 
Corruption  (Amendment) Act, 2001," to ratify and implement 
the OECD Convention on Bribery.  The legislation, which 
enabled Ireland to ratify a number of conventions dealing 
with corruption drawn up by the European Union, the Council 
of Europe, and the OECD, came fully into force as law in 
November 2002.  Ireland formally ratified the OECD Convention 
in September 2003.  Ireland is also a member of the OECD 
Working Group on Bribery and the Group of States Against 
Corruption (GRECO).  Under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 
the bribery of foreign officials is a criminal offense. 
Bribery of foreign officials may also invalidate a contract 
that a party is seeking to enforce in Ireland. 
 
45.  A number of ongoing judicial "Tribunals" are seeking to 
establish whether political donations by certain Irish 
companies in the late 1980s and early 1990s can be linked to 
favorable government decisions, mostly at the local level, in 
zoning and tax matters.  There is also media and public 
concern that business interests may have compromised Irish 
politics in the late 1980s and early 1990s.  Despite these 
reports of payments to political parties and figures in the 
1980s and early 1990s, there remains no indication that 
foreign businesses or investors have had to make such 
payments or been approached to make such payments to conduct 
business during the period in question or in years since. 
 
46.  In late 2004, the Government launched an inquiry into 
allegations that a Cabinet Minister approved for his former 
Department a no-bid public relations contract worth euro 
300,000 for a political associate.  The inquiry exonerated 
the Minister in 2005.  In late 2005, a junior Cabinet 
Minister resigned following press reports that a construction 
firm had worked on his house for free and that he had offered 
improper financial incentives to his office staff. 
 
47.  The Irish police investigate allegations of corruption. 
If sufficient evidence of criminal activity is found, the 
Director of Public Prosecutions prepares a file for 
prosecution.   A small number of public officials have been 
convicted of corruption and/or bribery in the past, although 
it is not a common occurrence. 
 
b. Bilateral Investment Agreements 
---------------------------------- 
 
48.    Ireland's only bilateral investment protection 
agreement is with the Czech Republic.  In addition, Ireland 
has bilateral tax treaties with the following countries: 
Australia, Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Canada, China, 
Croatia, Cyprus, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, 
Finland, France, Germany, Hungary, India, Italy, Israel, 
Japan, Korea (Rep. of), Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, 
Malaysia, Mexico, Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Pakistan, 
Poland, Portugal, Romania, Russia, Slovak Republic, Slovenia, 
South Africa, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, UK, the United 
States, and Zambia.  Treaties with Greece and Iceland were 
signed in November and December 2003, respectively, and 
became effective for the 2005 tax period.  A treaty replacing 
the existing treaty with Canada was signed in October 2003. 
Parliamentary procedures to bring the treaty into force were 
completed by Ireland in December 2004 and by Canada in April 
2005, and the treaty will become effective for the 2006 tax 
period.  A new agreement with Chile was signed in June 2005. 
The agreement will likely enter into force in 2006, subject 
to completion of the necessary parliamentary procedures by 
Ireland and Chile.  A protocol amending Ireland's agreement 
with Portugal was signed in November 2005 and will also 
likely enter into force in 2006, pending parliamentary 
procedures in both countries.  New treaties with Argentina, 
Egypt, Kuwait, Malta, Morocco, Singapore, Tunisia, Turkey and 
 
DUBLIN 00000060  010.2 OF 014 
 
 
Ukraine are being negotiated.  Existing treaties with Cyprus, 
France and Italy are in the process of re-negotiation.  These 
agreements serve to promote trade and investment between 
Ireland and the partner countries that would otherwise be 
discouraged by the possibility of double taxation. 
 
c.  OPIC and Other Investment Insurance Programs 
--------------------------------------------- --- 
 
49.   Since 1986 the U.S. Overseas Private Investment 
Corporation (OPIC) has been authorized to operate in Ireland 
as part of the U.S. effort to support the process of peace 
and reconciliation in Northern Ireland.   There is some 
potential in Ireland for OPIC's credit guarantee programs. 
No other countries have an investment insurance program in 
Ireland.  Ireland is a member of the Multilateral Investment 
Guarantee Agency (MIGA). 
 
50.   The estimated annual U.S. dollar value of local 
currency likely to be used by the U.S. Embassy in Ireland 
during 2006 is approximately USD 12.4 million.  The Embassy 
purchases local currency through centralized bulk purchasing 
arrangements at a competitive market rate.  Prospects for 
eurozone economic growth and for the U.S. trade and budget 
deficit positions will likely determine USD and euro currency 
movements through 2006. 
 
d. Labor 
-------- 
 
51.  In 2005, employment levels in Ireland reached historical 
highs, the result of continued strong economic growth.  As of 
the third quarter of 2005, the number of people employed was 
1.9 million, an increase of roughly 96,000, or 5.0 percent, 
compared to the third quarter of 2004.  Since 1994, 
employment growth has averaged roughly 4.0 percent, with 
lower rates recorded in 2002 and 2003 following the post 9-11 
global economic slowdown.  Comparing the third quarters of 
2004 and 2005, the largest increase in employment was in the 
vibrant (housing) construction sector, which added 30,400 
jobs.  There was also a gain of 20,200 jobs in business and 
financial services during the year.  Employment in production 
industries, including manufacturing, fell by 11,000, however, 
continuing a trend from 2004. 
 
52.  In contrast to 15.6 percent unemployment in 1993, 
Ireland registered 4.2 percent unemployment in the second 
quarter of 2005.  This was the lowest unemployment rate among 
EU Member States and slightly less than half the eurozone 
average.  The number of unemployed people in the third 
quarter of 205 was 96,700, representing an increase of 2,800 
compared to the third quarter of 2004.  Local economists 
believe that the Irish economy is as close to full employment 
as possible, with employers reporting difficulties in 
recruiting workers.  Whereas Ireland's primary policy goal 
was once job creation, the focus of government strategy has 
shifted to upgrading skills and increasing the number of 
workers in technology-intensive, high-value sectors. 
 
53.  Irish labor force regulation is less restrictive 
compared with most continental EU countries.  The Irish 
workforce is characterized by a high degree of flexibility, 
mobility, and education.  There is a relative gender balance 
in the workforce, with 1.2 million males and 882,000 females 
currently employed.  This gender balance reflects a change in 
social mores that has facilitated a surge in female 
employment since the mid-1980s 
 
54.  With the tightening of the labor market, wages remain on 
an upward growth curve.  As of the third quarter of 2005, 
average annual earnings per worker were euro 35,506, a 3.5 
percent increase over the third quarter of 2004.  Between 
1998 and 2003, compensation per employee increased by 37.1 
percent, compared with 8.7 percent in Germany over the same 
period.  The minimum wage was euro 5.20 when it was first 
introduced in 2000 and rose to euro 7.65 in 2005.  Employees 
earning the minimum wage will not have to pay personal income 
tax in 2006. 
 
55.  Unprecedented immigration levels, particularly from 
Eastern Europe, have added a new dynamic to the Irish labor 
market.  Of the 96,000 new workers added to the labor force 
between the third quarters of 2004 and 2005, roughly 40,000 
were immigrants, working mostly in the construction and 
lower-end services sectors.  According to some sources, the 
number of people taking up residence in Ireland since the 
accession of new EU Member States in 2004 may be as high as 
100,000.  Irish labor unions have expressed concern over 
 
DUBLIN 00000060  011.2 OF 014 
 
 
immigration trends and the possibility of displacement of 
Irish workers.  In late 2005, a labor dispute over plans by a 
ferry company to replace Irish workers with Eastern European 
migrants at lower wages prompted large-scale, peaceful 
demonstrations nationwide in support of protective mechanisms 
for both Irish and migrant laborers.  Economists point out, 
however, that yearly job creation in Ireland is currently 
sufficient to accommodate both Irish workers and immigrants. 
Economists also hold that that Ireland will require 50,000 
immigrants a year over the short term to sustain high rates 
of economic growth. 
 
56.   The Irish system of industrial relations is a voluntary 
one.  Pay levels and conditions of employment are generally 
agreed through collective bargaining between employers and 
employees.  Since 1987, collective bargaining has taken place 
under the framework of a series of national economic 
programs, negotiated by representatives of employers, trade 
unions, farmers, and the government.  This consensual "Social 
Partnership" approach has been accompanied by a marked 
improvement in the industrial relations climate since the 
mid-1980s.  Working days lost as a result of industrial 
disputes amounted to 37,482 in 2003 and 20,784 in 2004 (a 
fraction of the total days lost through industrial action in 
the 1980s and early 1990s). 
 
57.   The latest national economic program, "Sustaining 
Progress", was agreed under the Social Partnership framework 
in February 2003 and approved by Ireland's major unions in 
August 2004.  The 18-month agreement exchanges a 7 percent 
wage increase for industrial relations stability.  While the 
package will cost the GOI - Ireland's largest employer - an 
estimated euro 2.5 billion, private industries unable to pay 
the full 7 percent due to competitive pressures will be 
permitted to pay lesser increases or none at all.  As part of 
the package, the GOI committed to provide an increased supply 
of "affordable housing" and to amend legislation and 
statutory codes to strengthen the procedures by which unions 
can represent their members' interests.  In addition, the GOI 
enhanced statutory redundancy terms to provide released 
employees with two weeks' compensation for each year of 
service.  Negotiations on a successor program to "Sustaining 
Progress" were set to begin in early 2006. 
 
58.  Trade union demands for mandatory trade union 
recognition in the workplace are strongly resisted by 
employers.  While the Irish constitution guarantees the right 
of citizens to form associations and unions, Irish law also 
affirms the right of employers not to recognize unions and to 
deal with employees on an individual basis.  Currently, 
roughly 33 percent of workers in the private sector are 
unionized, compared to 95 percent in the public sector. 
Among foreign-owned firms, roughly 80 percent of workers do 
not belong to unions.  Employers also strongly oppose trade 
union demands for greater "partnership" between employees and 
employers at the enterprise level, including worker 
participation in managerial decisions through German-style 
"work councils."  Some progress has been made, however, with 
regard to increased profit-sharing. 
 
e.  Foreign Trade Zones/Free Ports 
---------------------------------- 
 
59.   The Shannon duty-free Processing Zone (SDFPZ) was 
established by legislation in 1957.  Under the legislation, 
eligible companies operating in the Shannon Free Zone are 
entitled to the following benefits: goods imported from 
non-EU countries for storage, handling or processing are duty 
free; no duty on goods exported from Shannon to non-EU 
countries; no time limit on disposal of goods held duty-free; 
minimum customs documentation and formalities; no Value Added 
Tax (VAT) on imported goods, including capital equipment; 
choice of having import duty on non-EU product calculated on 
its landing value or selling-out  price.  Qualifying criteria 
for eligible companies include employment creation and 
export-orientation.  Foreign-owned firms in the Shannon Free 
Zone have the same investment opportunities as indigenous 
Irish companies.  As of 2005, there were 110 internationally 
traded manufacturing and service companies established in the 
Shannon Free Zone, employing roughly 7,500 workers and 
generating about euro 2.5 billion in exports annually.  U.S. 
companies, which make up 57 percent of the firms operating 
out of Shannon, include GE Capital, Bristol Myers Squibb, 
DHL, UPS, Pfizer, Intel, Symantec, and Cabletron.  The 
Shannon Free Zone is technically an asset of SFADCO, although 
the Government is currently reviewing a proposal to place the 
zone under the authority of Shannon Airport as a means of 
airport funding. 
 
DUBLIN 00000060  012.2 OF 014 
 
 
 
60.  Duty free exemptions are available also to companies 
operating in Ireland's major deep-water port at Ringaskiddy 
in County Cork, although these have been used infrequently in 
recent years. 
 
f.  Foreign Direct Investment Statistics 
---------------------------------------- 
 
61.  According to Ireland's Central Statistical Office (CSO), 
the stock of FDI in Ireland for end-year 2004 stood at euro 
171.8 billion, or 117 percent of nominal 2004 GDP and a 2.7 
percent drop from 2003.  Ireland received FDI flows worth 
euro 8.98 billion in 2004, or 6 percent of nominal 2004 GDP 
and a 55 percent decline from 2003.  (Note: Different FDI 
calculation methods likely explain discrepancies with U.S. 
Department of Commerce statistics, which show U.S. FDI flows 
alone to Ireland as USD 10.4 billion in 2004, roughly the 
same amount as total FDI flows according to Irish statistics. 
 Further discrepancies are noted in the tables below.) 
 
62.   In 2004, the 1,022 companies supported by IDA Ireland, 
including 478 U.S. firms, spent euro 15.5 billion in the 
Irish economy from their annual sales of euro 75 billion 
(exports of euro 71 billion) and paid over euro 2.5 billion 
in corporate tax.  During 2005, IDA negotiated 71 new 
business projects with new and existing clients, which 
involved a total investment commitment of over euro 745 
million over the coming years.  IDA also supported 50 R&D 
investment projects involving a total investment by business 
in excess of euro 260 million, an 85 percent increase in 
value over 2004. 
 
63.  According to the American Chamber of Commerce, U.S. 
firms announced 34 investment projects in 2005, creating 
3,400 new jobs.  Of these projects, roughly a third were new 
investments, such as by Yahoo and Amazon, and two-thirds were 
expansion programs, such as by established companies Intel, 
Dell, Bisys, PFPC, and International Fund Service.  Roughly 
90 percent of FDI projects that came to Ireland in 2005 were 
of U.S. origin.  New investments were evenly split between 
the east coast, inclusive of Dublin, and the remainder of the 
country, with the largest regional clusters in Cork, Galway, 
and the Southeast.  The U.S. Department of Commerce estimates 
that U.S. companies' average return on investment (ROI) in 
Ireland is 24 percent. 
 
 
Table 7.1: Stock of U.S. Investment in Ireland 
(Millions of dollars; historical cost basis) 
 
                          2002      2003        2004 
 
All Industries            46,617    55,463      73,153 
 
Manufacturing             13,427    15,002      21,290 
 
  Food                    157       193         241 
 
  Chemicals               6,207     6,089       10,019 
 
  Metal                   22        33          51 
 
  Industrial machinery    23        24          26 
 
  Computers/Electronic    3,241     3,992       5,571 
 
  Transportation Equipment unavailable  unavailable   285 
 
Wholesale trade            2,680     2,998      4,598 
 
Information                10,362    14,048     17,029 
 
Finance/Insurance          7,520     8,681      11,101 
 
Depositary Institutions    145       445        unavailable 
 
Prof. Services             1,459     1,655      1,968 
 
Source:  U.S. Department of Commerce, Survey of Current 
Business 
 
 
Table 7.2: Investment Flows into Ireland by Country Origin, 
2004 
(in euro millions) 
 
Total                   8,987 
 
DUBLIN 00000060  013.2 OF 014 
 
 
 
UK                      -2,373 
 
Belgium/Luxembourg      5,581 
 
France                  846 
 
Germany                 921 
 
Italy                   271 
 
Netherlands             5,710 
 
Canada                  -271 
 
United States           3,996 
 
Japan                   1,392 
 
Source: Ireland Central Statistical Office (CSO) website 
 
(Note: According to the U.S. Department of Commerce, U.S. 
investment flow into Ireland in 2004 was USD 10.4 billion. 
Also, investment by U.S. companies in Ireland is often 
effected through intermediary subsidiaries located outside 
the United States.  According to the CSO, a sizeable 
proportion of the Dutch investment cited above originated in 
the United States.) 
 
 
Table 7.3: Investment Stock in Ireland by Country Origin, 2004 
(in euro millions) 
 
Total                   171,766 
 
UK                      24,706 
 
Belgium/Luxembourg      27,071 
 
France                  3,224 
 
Germany                 2,484 
 
Italy                   4,854 
 
Netherlands             56,069 
 
Canada                  5,987 
 
United States           25,825 
 
Source: Ireland Central Statistical Office (CSO) website 
 
(Note: According to the U.S. Department of Commerce, the 
stock of U.S. investment in Ireland in 2004 was USD 73.2 
billion.) 
 
 
Table 7.4: Total Employment by Sector in IDA-Supported 
Companies 
 
 
                                 2002       2003      2004 
 
Information/Communications 
Technologies                     43,499     41,362    41,887 
 
 
Pharmaceuticals/Healthcare       19,016     19,326    19,985 
 
 
Engineering                      16,536     15,372    13,989 
 
Miscellaneous Industry           10,047     9,282     8,243 
 
International and Financial 
Services                         43,281     43,407    44,842 
 
 
Total                            132,379    128,749   128,946 
 
Source: IDA Ireland Annual Report, 2004 
 
 
 
Table 7.5: Origins of IDA-Supported Companies, End-2004 
 
 
 
DUBLIN 00000060  014.2 OF 014 
 
 
Country          Number of Firms          Employment 
 
United States          478                90,236 
 
United Kingdom         116                6,824 
 
Germany                140                11,158 
 
Rest of Europe         209                16,163 
 
Asia/Pacific           46                 3,002 
 
Rest of World          33                 1,563 
 
Total                  1,022              128,946 
 
Source: IDA Ireland Annual Report, 2004 
 
 
 
Table 7.6: Major U.S. Investments in Ireland 
 
 
Company                                        Location 
 
Apple Computers                                    Cork 
 
AIG Europe                                       Dublin 
 
Bausch & Lomb                                 Waterford 
 
Berlitz                                          Dublin 
 
Bisys                                         Waterford 
 
Boston Scientific                 Galway, Cork, Wexford 
 
HP-Compaq Computers                      Galway, Dublin 
 
Citibank                                         Dublin 
 
Dell Computers                         Limerick, Dublin 
 
Eastman Kodak                            Limerick, Cork 
 
Fidelity                                         Dublin 
 
Gartner Group                                   Limerick 
 
Hertz                                             Dublin 
 
Hewlett-Packard                         Leixlip, Kildare 
 
IBM Ireland                                       Dublin 
 
Intel Ireland                            Dublin, Leixlip 
 
Johnson & Johnson                                 Dublin 
 
Millipore Ireland BV                                Cork 
 
Motorola                                            Cork 
 
Netscape Communications                           Dublin 
 
Novartis                                            Cork 
 
PFPC                                      Navan, Wexford 
 
Prudential Insurance of America              Letterkenny 
 
3Com                                              Dublin 
 
United Airlines                                   Dublin 
 
US Robotics                                       Dublin 
 
Woodchester Investments                           Dublin 
 
Wyeth Biopharma                                   Dublin 
 
Source: IDA Ireland Annual Report, 2004
KENNY

SECRET: MALAYSIA’S POLITICAL CRISIS

VZCZCXRO2974
OO RUEHCHI RUEHDT RUEHHM RUEHNH
DE RUEHKL #0644/01 2040829
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
O 220829Z JUL 08
FM AMEMBASSY KUALA LUMPUR
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 1398
INFO RUEHGP/AMEMBASSY SINGAPORE IMMEDIATE 4554
RHEHNSC/NSC WASHDC IMMEDIATE
RUCNASE/ASEAN MEMBER COLLECTIVE PRIORITY
RUEHAK/AMEMBASSY ANKARA PRIORITY 0123
RUEHBY/AMEMBASSY CANBERRA PRIORITY 2590
RUEHLO/AMEMBASSY LONDON PRIORITY 0454
RUEHKO/AMEMBASSY TOKYO PRIORITY 2547
RUEHWL/AMEMBASSY WELLINGTON PRIORITY 0565
RUEHBS/USEU BRUSSELS PRIORITY
RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHDC PRIORITY
RHHMUNA/CDR USPACOM HONOLULU HI PRIORITY
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 04 KUALA LUMPUR 000644 

SIPDIS 

FOR EAP AND INR
SINGAPORE - PASS TO ASSISTANT SECRETARY HILL 

E.O. 12958: DECL: 07/22/2028
TAGS: PGOV PREL PHUM KDEM KJUS MY
SUBJECT: MALAYSIA'S POLITICAL CRISIS 

REF: A. KUALA LUMPUR 609 - UMNO RESISTS REFORM
     B. KUALA LUMPUR 160 - ELECTION SHOCK 

Classified By: AMBASSADOR JAMES R. KEITH, FOR REASON 1.4 (B AND D). 

Summary and Introduction
------------------------ 

1.  (C) The next four weeks will be a telling period in the
history of the United Malays National Organization (UMNO)
rule in Malaysia. For the first time in its fifty-year
dominance, UMNO is faced with a multi-racial opposition
alliance that has some credible prospect for forming the next
government. To date, it appears the ruling party finds this
situation intolerable. UMNO leaders, united behind but also
in a sense using Prime Minister (PM) Abdullah, have made it
clear that they are willing to blacken Malaysia's reputation
to ensure the end to opposition leader Anwar Ibrahim's
political challenge. The coming Parliamentary session in the
latter half of August is the next likely setting for a
showdown, and could precipitate another arrest of Anwar if he
is deemed to be doing to well politically between now and
then. Conversely, if the ruling party concludes it has him
boxed in UMNO may be content to use short-term measures such
as judicial restraining orders and the like to prevent him
from addressing and attracting a national audience. 

2.  (C) We should continue to speak out publicly in support
of the rule of law, taking care not to undermine our
principled position by being perceived to be too close to the
opposition. If the authorities escalate their rhetoric in
anticipation of another arrest of Anwar, we will need to
adjust accordingly. If, on the other hand, the ruling party
restrains itself from arresting Anwar again in August, we
will want to consider our longer-term approach to a period of
prolonged uncertainty. For the time being, we should continue
to press hard the bilateral initiatives currently underway as
these are tied directly to profound U.S. interests and
support the development of a more transparent and accountable
set of systems in Malaysian government and society. As we
begin to develop our public diplomacy programs for the coming
fiscal year, we will seek to give pride of place to the rule
of law.  End Summary and Introduction. 

What does UMNO want?
-------------------- 

3.  (C) The ruling party wants to stay in power indefinitely,
and that means Anwar and the multi-racial opposition front he
is leading must fail. At least so far, there is scant
evidence of a more thoughtful and forward-looking analysis
within UMNO. In fact, the ruling party could find some common
ground with the opposition if it were willing to countenance
gradual development of a two-party system of checks and
balances.  Instead, the ruling party defines national
security primarily as a matter of protecting UMNO's
superiority and ensuring that "people power," or a level
electoral playing field, cannot become the opposition's means
of toppling the ruling party. 

How is UMNO getting what it wants?
---------------------------------- 

4.  (C) The ruling party is relying primarily on its own
party structure and the embedded system of carrots and sticks
to keep party membership in line. As in other one-party
states, the party is seen opportunistically as a mechanism
for personal advancement and enrichment. There is an
ideological component, in terms of Malay supremacy, but that
is in practice a matter of institutionalized opportunism. In
good times UMNO can maintain control by distributing power
and money to get what it wants. In bad times, it uses the
stick, and for now that means intimidation. The ruling elite
maintains control over the security apparatus through party
stalwarts who run the security institutions, mainly the
police but also the military. We believe the military will
remain loyal to legitimate leadership and is not a likely
tool to overturn an elected, royally-approved and Malay-led
government from either the ruling or opposition side. The
police, on the other hand, follow orders from the ruling
party. The "commando-style" arrest of Anwar last week, the
roadblocks and security checks throughout the city of Kuala
Lumpur, the recent arrest of blogger Raja Petra, intimidation
of Sabah politicians, and the authorities' strident rhetoric
are all part of a broad message to the Malaysian people that
they had better not stand in UMNO's path. In today's
Malaysia, one can get along by going along (and of course one
can go farther as a Malay rather than a Chinese or Indian),
but it is also true that one can be run over. We only have
anecdotal evidence for this, but the sad spiral into past
patterns may have become the predicate for some middle and
upper class Malaysians who have the option of emigrating.
Rather than wait to be run over, it is far preferable to get
out of the game. 

What happened to post-election reforms?
--------------------------------------- 

5.  (C) It is deja vu all over again. Just as in Abdullah's
first term, characterized by lofty rhetoric in support of
political reform but virtually no action, after the March
elections Abdullah's prominent reform initiatives seem to
have evaporated into nothing (ref A). Despite strong popular
support for political reform, there is evidently even
stronger opposition to reform within the ruling party. Those
who have the most to lose through reform are the same ruling
elites, including Abdullah's own circle, who must be
persuaded to allow reform to happen. It would take strong
leadership to push that sort of initiative through the party
structure, perhaps going over the heads of party elites and
enlisting the support of the masses. Abdullah doesn't seem to
have that kind of leadership in him, even if that were his
goal. 

6.  (C) Instead, the ruling party seems intent on sustaining
the patina of reform without actually undertaking any step
that might genuinely involve systemic change or weakening of
executive power. For example, against the backdrop of
opposition leader Anwar Ibrahim's arrest, last week the
government arrested a number of immigration officials for
corruption. These men are to be forgiven for wondering, "why
me?" Of all who might be prosecuted, including the most
senior leaders or their families, why these relative small
fry? Through their sacrifice UMNO can claim action against
corruption without actually doing much of anything. 

What does Anwar want?
--------------------- 

7.  (C) This question is not as easily answered as one might
think. For the short term, he wants to be Prime Minister.
First and foremost Anwar is a pragmatist, as evidenced by his
ability to yoke together in an opposition front the Islamist
party (PAS) and the Chinese. What are his firm guiding
principles? What are the limits of his ability to compromise
or accommodate? We are not sure. It was clear, for example,
that he tolerated PAS's use of America as a political foil
during the recent campaign season, and opposition foreign
policy announcements on Mideast issues since the election
have tended to follow PAS lines. But broadly speaking, he
wants political liberalization and he can be expected to be
an ardent supporter of the rule of law and a market economy,
given his personal history. Malaysian foreign policy might
not change as much as we would like to think under and Anwar
government, especially in areas relating to Islam and the
Middle East in which PAS will have an important say. 

8.  (C) For now, we may have to content ourselves with
identifying what Anwar does not want. He does not want to be
boxed in and made irrelevant by UMNO, or jailed.  Anwar
currently speaks in terms of "becoming Prime Minister or
going to jail," as an either/or proposition.  At age 61, he
does not want to let slip what may be his last, best chance
to lead the Malaysian government.  He also does not want
arch-nemesis DPM Najib Tun Razak to become Prime Minister, as
Anwar believes Najib is much more likely than Abdullah to use
harsh authoritarian measures to stop him and the Opposition. 

What will happen in the months ahead and what should we do?
--------------------------------------------- -------------- 

9.  (C) UMNO will try to keep Anwar on the defensive and
prevent him from winning defections to his opposition front
from the ruling party's coalition. The loose coalition of
UMNO loyalists who seem to have banded together around
Abdullah will likely try to limit the cost of each step they
feel they must take to contain and eventually eradicate
Anwar's influence. If they can preserve the status quo
without putting Anwar in jail on the sodomy charge perhaps
they will do so, content to keep it as a ready tactic to
deploy against him whenever necessary. If Anwar is unwilling
to remain boxed in by that tactic, and history suggests
precisely this outcome, the authorities seem entirely
prepared to put him in jail for a longer period of time. The
government has taken a strong stand against popular street
demonstrations, hoping to prevent Anwar from developing the
kind of national popular response that will be necessary to
create an environment in which he can win converts from the
ruling party coalition. 

10.  (C) The skirmishing around these objectives will
continue throughout July and August, and we can expect the
opposition to seek to up the ante the closer we get to the
Parliamentary session in the latter half of August. The
initiative rests with Anwar. If he goes quiet, his political
hopes fade and his personal freedom is more secure in the
coming weeks; over a longer period Anwar sees himself as
vulnerable to jailing or government action unless he removes
himself from politics. The greater his political success, the
greater a threat he is to UMNO, and the more his personal
freedom becomes problematic. 

11.  (C) We need to continue to speak with authority from
Washington and this Embassy in support of the broad
principles underlying the debate in Malaysia. We should avoid
undermining our principled position, and the opposition
parties themselves, by appearing too close to the
personalities involved, especially Anwar. Publicly, our words
should continue to revolve around universal values, the
criticality of the rule of law to every dimension of our
bilateral relationship and Malaysia's political and economic
success. 

12.  (C) Privately, we will want to underline the futility of
the Malaysian effort to deny the political nature of the
crisis before them. Whatever they believe about the "facts"
of the sodomy case, at this point the ruling party has no
chance of success in conveying to the Malaysian or
international audience that this is merely a case of one
citizen's charge against another. The authorities themselves
betray that fiction on a daily basis in the pages of the
domestic press, and barely one in ten Malaysians are buying
into the party line a survey tells us. UMNO leaders may fail
to grasp the consequences of upping the ante; they hear what
we are saying, but do not understand sufficiently well how
difficult it will be for them to overcome the shadows they
are casting on the country. They no doubt thought they were
choosing the more palatable path in using the criminal law,
and thus the sodomy charge, rather than detaining Anwar as a
matter of national security under the Internal Security Act.
But contrary to their intent, many in the international
community will take this as escalation. Now the criminal law
is laid bare as a political tool, just as useful to the
ruling party as the national security law. 

What is the long-term horizon for bilateral ties?
--------------------------------------------- ---- 

13.  (C) Most of our relationship already hews tightly to the
principle of mutual benefit. Our liaison, law enforcement,
military, and commercial ties are well developed and tied
directly to key national interests on both sides. Regardless
of the heat of the rhetoric between us, I would expect
Malaysia to seek to preserve the core relationships it has
with us. With regard to the political dimension of our
policy, Malaysia already has a less than inspiring record at
the UN and is keen to preserve its options with the likes of
the Nonaligned Movement. It may not be possible for Malaysia
to become less helpful in international political areas
identified with the United States, and it is unlikely to
retreat in areas that are primarily multilateral
(peacekeeping, for example). The biggest costs to us over the
long term if Malaysia continues to undermine its own legal
system are precisely in the domestic legal arena. 

14.  (C) Much of the promise of our bilateral ties is rooted
in the notion of a transition towards a thriving civil
society and robust rule of law in Malaysia. We wish to expand
our export control and non-proliferation cooperation with
Malaysia, for example. It is neither in our interest nor
Malaysia's for this country to become increasingly a place
where smugglers can do good business. Thwarting such a
development (or rolling it back) requires a sophisticated set
of export control laws and robust enforcement by a strong and
secure government, not one struggling to justify itself to
its citizens. Despite the local paranoia about U.S.
intervention in internal affairs, our influence is actually
being brought to bear to support and promote precisely those
objectives that most Malaysians want for their own benefit. 

15.  (C) If the authorities are able to get through the next
several months without doing fatal damage to the rule of law
in Malaysia, I hope the public diplomacy dimension of our
bilateral ties will take on a decidedly more legal and
judicial cast. We should push ahead with our FTA talks if
possible because that serves both our own economic interests
as well as the broader goal of establishing more transparent
and accountable systems in this country. In addition, to try
to bring public focus to the centrality of the rule of law in
our ties, we might want to organize visits in the short and
medium term by a Supreme Court Justice, the Attorney General,
and representatives of the American Bar Association. We will
also review our international visitor program and other
people-to-people exchanges in the coming fiscal year to
ensure a central focus on the rule of law. My speeches and
those of my staff will put the rule of law at the center. 

16.  (C) We will continue to monitor closely the situation
for signs that more robust policy responses are needed. In
the meantime, we should continue to exploit every opportunity
for authoritative bilateral exchange to ensure we have done
all we can to open Malaysian leaders' eyes to the
international costs of efforts that diminish the rule of law. 

KEITH

WIE DIE STASI NEU JETZT DIE BRD UNTERWANDERT: UND DIE JUSTIZ BLIND MITARBEITET

http://www.victims-opfer.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=19062&action=edit

DER “FREIWILLIGE BERATUNGSVERTRAG” der estavis MIT DER FINGIERTEN “GoMoPa”

Die wichtigste Finanzierungsquelle von “GoMoPa” war laut der Teilhaberinformation auch eine Bauträgergesellschaft, gegen die Anwalt Resch im Auftrag von Anlegern vorgegangen war. Deren Muttergesellschaft Estavis schloss einen “freiwilligen Beratervertrag” mit “GoMoPa” – das ist das Strickmuster der Resch-”GoMoPa”-Vorgehensweise…

Schon eigenartig. Da hat Gomopa eine eigene GmbH in Berlin – eine 100 % Tochter der Goldman, Morgenstern & Partners LLC – schliesst aber Verträge mit Erfüllungsort Deutschland mit dem Gerichtsstand New York. Die GmbH bestand bereits zum Zeitpunkt des Vertragsabschlusses.

GoMoPa GmbH, Berlin(Unter den Linden 21, 10117 Berlin). Firma: GoMoPa GmbH Sitz / Zweigniederlassung: Berlin Gegenstand: Die wirtschaftliche Beratung, insbesondere des Mittelstandes, in der europäischen Gemeinschaft unter der Wortmarke GoMoPa. Dazu gehören die Präsentation von Firmen im Internet und anderen Medien, Vermietung von Werbeflächen auch im Internet, die Vermittlung von Handels- und Wirtschaftskontakten und Werbung auch über das Internet sowie das Bereitstellen von Informationen und Portalen im Internet. Stamm- bzw. Grundkapital: 50.000,00 EUR Vertretungsregelung: Ist ein Geschäftsführer bestellt, so vertritt er die Gesellschaft allein. Sind mehrere Geschäftsführer bestellt, wird die Gesellschaft gemeinschaftlich durch zwei Geschäftsführer oder durch einen Geschäftsführer in Gemeinschaft mit einem Prokuristen vertreten. Alleinvertretungsbefugnis kann erteilt werden. Geschäftsführer:; 1. Reski, Peter, *23.12.1952, Verden/Aller; mit der Befugnis die Gesellschaft allein zu vertreten mit der Befugnis Rechtsgeschäfte mit sich selbst oder als Vertreter Dritter abzuschließen Rechtsform: Gesellschaft mit beschränkter Haftung.

========================================================

 

BERATUNGSVERTRAG

Zwischen der
ESTAVIS AG
Uhlandstrasse 165
D-10719 Berlln
– im folgenden ESTAVIS genannt –
Und

Goldman, Morgenstern & Partners LLC.
575 Madison Avenue, 10th floor
New York, NY 10022-2511
USA
– im folgenden GoMoPa genannt –

I. AUFTRAG UND DURCHFÜHRUNG

1.1 ESTAVIS beauftragt GoMoPa mit der Erarbeitung elnes neuartigen Vertrlebskonzeptes für den Abverkauf Denkmalgeschützter
Immoblilien an eine entsprechende Klientel, die unter zur Hilfenahme des lnternets und unter Einhaltung verbraucherrechtlicher Auflagen geworben werden soll.
1.2. Dazu gehören: Vorschläge zur Herstetlung von Internetseiten und entsprechender Werbung, Kostenberatung, Überwachung
und Einholung entsprechender Angebote, Personalsuche, Verhandlungen mit affilablen Anbietern, Vermittlung von Consutern.
1.3 Die Durchführung erfolgt in enger und ständiger Abstimmung mit einem Vertreter des Vorstands der ESTAVIS AG, sowie
rechtlichen und steuerlichen Beratern der ESTAVIS. GoMoPa wird diesbezüglich entsprechende Vorschläge erarbeiten, die detalllierte und
schriftliche und mündliche Empfehlungen auf Basis der von ESTAVIS angestrebten Zlele beinhalten.
1.4 Weitere Beratungsleistungen GoMoPa’s bezlehen slch nicht auf Rechts- oder Steuerberatung, haben aber Unterhändler
Gespräche sowie die Vermittlung entsprechender Consulter zum Inhalt, jedoch ohne rechtsverbindliche Vollmacht.

2. HONORAR
2.1 Für die Erbringung der genannten Leistunqen zahlt die ESTAVIS an GOMOPA ein Honorar In Höhe von 75.000.- € (Fünfundsiebzigtausend Euro). Das Honorar lst fällig wie folqt:
2.2. Bis zum 21.08.2009 eine Abschlagszahlung In Höhe von 50.000.- Euro. Anschliessend jeweils zum Ende eines Monats (beginnend mit dem August) 5 Teilbeträge in Höhe von jeweils 5.000,- Euro gezahlt. Zahlungen erfolgen gegen Rechnunqsstellung.
2.3. Leistungen, dle eventuell darüber hlnaus zu erbringen sind (eventuelte Reisekosten, Spesen, zusätzliche Aufgaben und
Arbeiten) werden separat und ausschliesslich nach Absprache in Rechnung gestellt und von ESTAVIS gezahlt.

3. SCHLUSSBESTIMMUNGEN

3.1 Sind oder werden einzelne Bestimmungen dieser Vereinbarung unwirksam, so bleibt die Gültigkeit der Vereinbarung im
Übriqen unberührt. Ungültige Bestimmungen sind einvernehmlich durch solche zu ersetzen, die unter Berücksichtigung der Interessenlage den gewünschten wirtschaftlichen Zweck zu erreichen geeignet sind. Entsprechendes gilt für die Ausfüllung von
Lücken, die sich In dieser Verelnbarung etwa herausstellen könnten.
3.2 Aenderungen und Ergänzungen dieser Vereinbarung bedürfen zu ihrer Rechtswirksamkeit der Schriftform. Das Gleiche gilt für
ehe Abbedingung dieser Schriftformklausel.
3.3 Erfülllungsort und ausschliesslicher Gerichtsstand ist New York.

Berlln den, New York den, 13.08.20O9

ESTAVIS AG Goldman Morgenstern & Partners llc
Mozanovski F. Lanz Klaus Maurischat

Nicht zu verehrender Bennewirtz – mutmasslicher Kapitalanlagebetrüger (was ist eigentlich ein “bennewirtz”?)

Nicht zuverehrender Bennewirtz,

nachdem Sie zahlreiche Anleger um Ihr Geld gebracht haben (siehe Klagen in Düsseldorf und veröffentlicht in der Rheinischen Post) und wir dies aufgedeckt haben, haben Sie uns Ihre alten STASI-Freunde von “GoMoPa” auf den Hals gehetzt zum Stalking, zur Erpressung und  zum (Ruf)Mord.

Wir kennen Ihre sonstigen Bestrebungen auch, mutmasslicher Kapitalanlagebetrüger !

Seien Sie versichert – Ihre Tricks helfen Ihnen nur temporär

Bald mehr, nicht zu ehrender, mutmasslicher Kapitalanlagebetrüger und mutmasslicher “GoMoPa”-Partner oder “Auftraggeber”.

Übrigens, warum wollen Sie, dass wir die einwandfrei recherchierten Fakten zum Tode von Heinz Gerlach löschen,

nicht verehrenswürdiger Bennewirtz  ?

Magister Bernd Pulch

ALLE WIKILEAKS ARCHIVE AUF UNSERER WEBSITE

Liebe Leser,

im Zuge unserer Kooperation mit Wikileaks zeigen wir die kompletten Wikileaks-Archive hier:

http://ebizz.tv/wikileaks/

Im Zuge eines verantwortungsvollen und couragierten Journalismus, den fast alle Medien in Europa und weniger in den USA  aus finanziellen Interessen und aus Angst vermissen lassen, werden wir unsere Aktivitäten weiter verstärken.

Über Zensurbestrebungen und auch über illegale und legale Tricks, um die Wahrheit zu verschleiern werden wir Sie informieren.

Herzlichst Ihr

Magister Bernd Pulch

PS Wir finanzieren uns auch über Erotik-Programme, somit sollten diese Seite nur Personen übr 18 Jahre besuchen.

Wie man ein ganzes Land verkauft…

DAS GEHEIMDOKUMENT – THE WIKILEAKS THREAT

WikiLeaks_Response_v6

CLICK ON LINE ABOVE – LINIE OBEN “WikiLeaks Response v6” to download – um zu downloaden

In a document titled “The WikiLeaks Threat” three data intelligence companies, Plantir Technologies, HBGary Federal and Berico Technologies, outline a plan to attack Wikileaks. They are acting upon request from Hunton and Williams, a law firm working for Bank of America. The Department of Justice recommended the law firm to Bank of America according to an article in The Tech Herald. The prosed attacks on WikiLeaks according to the slides include these actions:

- Feed the fuel between the feuding groups. Disinformation. Create messages around actions of sabotage or discredit the opposing organizations. Submit fake documents and then call out the error.
- Create concern over the security of the infrastructure. Create exposure stories. If the process is believed not to be secure they are done.
- Cyber attacks against the infrastructure to get data on document submitters. This would kill the project. Since the servers are now in Sweden and France putting a team together to get access is more straightforward.
- Media campaign to push the radial and reckless nature of WikiLeaks activities. Sustain pressure. Does nothing for the fanatics, but creates concern and doubt among moderates.
- Search for leaks. Use social media to profile and identify risky behavior of employees.

Beweise: Ich, Magister Bernd Pulch, fordere im Namen aller Stalking-Opfer von “GoMoPa” – die Distanzierung von RA Reschs, Gerd Bennewirtz, Peter Ehlers, Jan Mucha und einen justiziablen Ansprechpartner

Liebe Leser,

es muss klar gesagt werden:

Beweise: Ich, Magister Bernd Pulch, fordere im Namen aller Stalking-Opfer von “GoMoPa” einen justiziablen Ansprechpartner von “GoMoPa”  samt Zustelladresse !!!

 

Ich fordere einen Beweis, wer der Eigentümer und bestimmende Finanzier ist!

Eine Eidestaatliche Versicherung von RA Jochen und Manfred Resch, dass sie nicht die beherrschenden Kräfte der “GoMoPa” sind.

Eine Eidesstattliche Versicherung, dass alle “GoMoPa”-Mitarbeiter nicht vorbestraft sind und nicht gegen ihre Bewährungsauflagen verstossen.

Aussserdem möchte eine Eidesstattliche Versicherung , dass Peter Ehlers und Gerd Bennewirtz die kriminellen “Stalker-Sites”  nicht gegen mich in Auftrag gaben.

Ich gebe Ihnen hierfür 24 Stunden !

Hier die Opferliste von “GoMoPa” in 2011 alleine:

Folgende Firmen und Personen wurden u.a. von Peter Ehlers (wenn er denn so heisst) und “GoMoPa”, dem STASI-”NACHICHTENDIENST” seit Jahresanfang – ohne jeden Beweis – verunglimpft, um daraus Profit für Ihren postkommunistischen Saftladen zu schlagen:

– Angela Merkel

– Wolfgang Schäuble

– Accessio AG

– Antek International

– Andreas Decker

– Anna Schwertner

– Bernd Müller

– Bernd Pulch

– Beluga

– Bliznet Group Inc.

– Centrum Immobilien

– Coldwell Banker

– CPA Capital Partners

– CSA

– Debiselect

– Deutsche Bank

– DKB Bank

– Dr. Paul Jensen

– Ekrem Redzepagic

– Erste Mai GmbH

– Express Kurier Europa

– FRONTAL 21

– Garbe

– General Global Media

– Genfer Kreditanstalt

– HCI

– HypoLeasing

– Kreis Sparkasse Tübingen

– Leipziger Bauträger (etliche Firmen, hier subsummiert)

– Lothar Berresheim

– Martina Oeder

– Martin Sachs

– Meridian Capital

– Money Pay

– Oak Tree

– Prime Estate

– Prosperia Mephisto 1 GmbH & Co KG

– Stefan Schramm

– Teldafax

– TipTalk.com

– Wirecard

Natürlich alles OHNE IRGENDEINEN BEWEIS VON VORBESTRAFTEN SERIENBETRÜGERN AUF EINER HOMEPAGE MIT KEINER ECHTEN PERSON IM IMPRESSUM STATTDESSEN MIT EINER NEW YORKER BRIEFKASTENADRESSE IM AUFTRAG MUTMASSLICH VON RA JOCHEN RESCH UND RA MANFRED RESCH, PETER EHLERS UND GERD BENNEWIRTZ -UND UNTER MITARBEIT VON GOOGLE, DEUTSCHLAND,

Herzlichst Ihr

Magister Bernd Pulch

RA UN:RESCHT- Geld-Leben Wie die CYBER-STASI jetzt die Wirtschaft unterwandern will

„Heribert Hellenbroich, 53, Ex-Chef des Bundesnachrichtendienstes (BND) und zuvor Leiter des Bundesamts für Verfassungsschutz, begibt sich in ungewohnte Gesellschaft. Gemeinsam mit dem ehemaligen Stasi-Oberst und Offizier im besonderen Einsatz (OibE) Ehrenfried Stelzer, 58, hat Hellenbroich einen Verein gegründet. Das “Internationale Institut für Wirtschaftssicherheit zu Berlin” soll, so versichern der ehemalige Top-Nachrichtendienstler (West) und sein Kompagnon (Ost) unisono, aus “ideellen Motiven” Industriebetriebe in Fragen der Wirtschaftssicherheit beraten. “Selbstlos” (Satzung) wollen Hellenbroich und Stelzer für “störungsfreie wirtschaftliche” Ost-West-Beziehungen eintreten und zum Wohl der Unternehmer wirken: Wirtschaftskriminalität abwehren helfen, über Daten- und Banksicherheit aufklären”, schreibt der „SPIEGEL” bereits 1990.

http://www.spiegel.de/spiegel/print/d-13502488.html

Und: „Berührungsängste mit dem Ex-Stasi-Offizier hat Hellenbroich nicht. Dessen Vergangenheit sei für die künftige Arbeit “nicht weiter von Interesse”, sagt der ehemalige BND-Chef, der 1985 über den Spionagefall Tiedge stolperte. Die rein nachrichtendienstliche Tätigkeit der Stasi sehe er ohnehin neutral: “Was haben wir, der BND, denn anderes gemacht?” Ehemalige Kollegen, die unter Stelzers Leitung in der Sektion Kriminalistik an der Ost-Berliner Humboldt-Universität gearbeitet haben, wundern sich über soviel Vertrauensseligkeit. Stelzer, seit 1961 Mitarbeiter der Stasi, sei ein Hardliner gewesen — einer, der “nach dem Motto ,Nichts geht über den geliebten Genossen Erich Honecker'” verfahren sei, sagt Horst Howorka, stellvertretender Leiter der Sektion Kriminalistik.
Die Humboldt-Universität hat Stelzer beurlaubt und gegen ihn ein Disziplinarverfahren eingeleitet. Der Ehrenausschuß der Uni hält es für “unzumutbar”, den Hellenbroich-Kompagnon weiter zu beschäftigen.” Das war 1990.

Heute ist Ehrenfried Stelzers Vision Realität geworden. Stelzer und seine Mitstreiter und Nachfolger, haben es — 20 Jahre nach dem Fall der Mauer fast geschaft: Mit dem„NACHRICHTENDIENST” „GoMoPa” mutmasslich gesteuert von dem Berliner „Anlegerschutzanwalt” Jochen Resch, einem wie er selber zugibt, langjährigen Bekannten, ja Intimus Stelzers, ist die CYBER-STASI entstanden, die ihre Gegner gnadenlos ausschaltet — „Wenn es sein muss auch mit Dioxin”, sagen Insider.
Stelzer, der angeblich mittlerweile verstorben sein soll, war der „ERSTE KRIMINOLOGE DER DDR”. Sein „GoMoPa”-Erbe ist hoch-toxisch und mit Dioxin verseucht.
„GoMoPa” — alleine der Name des ost-Berliner „NACHRICHTENDIENSTES” löst bei Betroffenen und Maurischat Opfern eine Mischung aus Entsetzen und Belustigung aus. Immer mehr aber überwiegt die Belustigung über den vorbestraften Serienbetrüger Maurischat alias Holbe alias Siewert. Der Grund: Viele seiner Opfer haben es ihm gleichgetan und zusammen mit anderen Geschädigten der mutmasslichen „GoMoPa”-Rheinland-Fraktion „SJB-Fonds”, Neuss die Internet-Plattform http./www.sjb-fonds-opfer.com gegründet.

BENNEWIRTZ ,”NUN GoMoPa”, VERSUCHT ERNEUT “GoMoPa”-KRITISCHE STELLEN LÖSCHEN ZU LASSEN

Subject:   Fwd: Request
From:   “P. Schmitz” <p.schmitz@deinguterruf.de>
Date:   Fri, July 8, 2011 11:24 am
To:   office@ebizz.tv
Priority:   Normal
Options:   View Full Header | View Printable Version  | Download this as a file

 

Dear madams, dear sirs,

unfortunately I did not receive a reply concerning my request from
July 1st from you yet. In this context I again want to point out the
major wish of our customer SJB seeing the name removed from the
entries mentioned below. It would be a great pleasure if you can
manage the removal according to the wish of our customer.

Thank you very much for your understanding.

Please do not hesitate contacting me for further discussion.

With kind regards,
P. Schmitz
Dein guter Ruf.de


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: P. Schmitz <p.schmitz@deinguterruf.de>
Date: 2011/7/1
Subject: Request
To: office@ebizz.tv


Dear madams, dear sirs,

by order of our customer SJB Fonds Skyline OHG we are kindly asking you
to remove some entries on your website thetvnet.com. The
topicality and the
correctness of these entries are no longer up to date. It is a major
concern of our customer to see them removed:

immobilien-vertraulich.com/law/7279-die-killer-bibel-toxdat--die-900-seiten-stasi-mordstudie-von-gomopa-mastermind-ehrenfried-stelzer.html
immobilien-vertraulich.com/law/7277-sjb-fonds-opfer-sven-babyface-schmidt-als-chef-terrorist-von-europas-gefaehrlichster-internet-kriminellen-bande-enttarnt-.html
immobilien-vertraulich.com/law/7268-der-beweis-tatsaechlich-vorbestrafter-serienbetrueger-klausmaurischat-gomopa-hat-eigenes-kinder-portal-.html
immobilien-vertraulich.com/law/7264-die-killer-bibel-toxdat--die-900-seiten-stasi-mordstudie-von-gomopa-mastermind-ehrenfried-stelzer.html
immobilien-vertraulich.com/law/7262-sjb-fonds-opfer-sven-babyface-schmidt-als-chef-terrorist-von-europas-gefaehrlichster-internet-kriminellen-bande-enttarnt-.html
immobilien-vertraulich.com/law/7224-die-killer-bibel-toxdat-die-900-seiten-stasi-mordstudie-von-gomopa-mastermind-ehrenfried-stelzer.html
immobilien-vertraulich.com/law/7223-opfer-sven-schmidt-als-chef-terrorist-von-europas-gefaehrlichster-internet-kriminellen-bande-enttarnt.html
immobilien-vertraulich.com/law/7217-der-beweis-tatsaechlich-vorbestrafter-serienbetrueger-klausmaurischat-gomopa-hat-eigenes-kinder-portal-.html
immobilien-vertraulich.com/law/7212-die-killer-bibel-toxdat-die-900-seiten-stasi-mordstudie-von-gomopa-mastermind-ehrenfried-stelzer.html
immobilien-vertraulich.com/law/7210-opfer-sven-schmidt-als-chef-terrorist-von-europas-gefaehrlichster-internet-kriminellen-bande-enttarnt.html
immobilien-vertraulich.com/law/7203-der-beweis-tatsaechlich-vorbestrafter-serienbetrueger-klausmaurischat-gomopa-hat-eigenes-kinder-portal-.html
immobilien-vertraulich.com/law/7200-opfer-die-killer-bibel-toxdat-die-900-seiten-stasi-mordstudie-von-gomopa-mastermind-ehrenfried-stelzer.html
immobilien-vertraulich.com/law/7189-opfer-die-killer-bibel-toxdat--die-900-seiten-stasi-mordstudie-von-gomopa-mastermind-ehrenfried-stelzer.html
immobilien-vertraulich.com/law/7120--klaus-maurischats-gomopa-cybermoerder-leichen-und-falschmeldungen-plastern-ihren-weg--nicht-nur-im-internet.html
immobilien-vertraulich.com/boerse-ipo-reit/7119--der-mehrfach-vorbestrafte-serienbetrueger-und-mutmassliche-paederast-klaus-maurischat-und-seine-neue-qwirecard-enteq.html

We hope you can manage the removal of these entries according to the wish
of our customer contemporarily. . These entries and similar ones cause
major problems for our customer.
We wanna thank you for your appreciation, for further information
please visit our website deinguterruf.de. (the english version is
still under construction).

In case you are not the right receipt for this request, it would be
very kind if you can name the correct person in charge.
If you have further questions concerning this case or our services in
general, please contact me.
It would be a great pleasure to receive a positive feedback.


With kind regards,

--
Mit freundlichen Grüßen,


P. Schmitz
DEIN GUTER RUF.DE

Ein Projekt der
MoveVision GmbH

Alfredstraße 341
45133 ESSEN
Tel: 0201-2489452
E-mail: p.schmitz (at) deinguterruf.de

MoveVision – GmbH - HRB 22121
Geschäftsführer: Martin Lux - Steuernummer: DE228746207



-- 
Mit freundlichen Grüßen,


P. Schmitz
DEIN GUTER RUF.DE

Ein Projekt der
MoveVision GmbH

Alfredstraße 341
45133 ESSEN
Tel: 0201-2489452
E-mail: p.schmitz (at) deinguterruf.de

MoveVision – GmbH - HRB 22121
Geschäftsführer: Martin Lux - Steuernummer: DE228746207

FRANKFURTER ALLGEMEINE ZEITUNG ÜBER DIE GEMEINGEFÄHRLICHEN “GoMoPa”-KRIMINELLEN-VEREINIGUNG, MUTMASSLICH PARTNER VON BENNEWIRTZ UND EHLERS

http://www.faz.net/artikel/C30857/cyberstalking-im-netz-30321544.html

http://www.faz.net/artikel/C30350/wirtschaftskriminalitaet-grossrazzia-wegen-verdachts-auf-insiderhandel-30309286.html

Hier einer meiner absoluten Film Lieblinge: Hero: Jet Li

BERNDPULCH.ORG WIEDER BEI GOOGLE INDEXIERT – FÜRS ERSTE

Liebe Leser,

offensichtlich haben unsere hochbezahlten Anwälte in Kalifornien wieder eine Indexierung dieser Site http://www.berndpulch.org erreicht.

Ich bedanke mich.

Das bestärkt uns in unserem Kampf für die “GoMoPa”-Opfer”, die sicher nicht diese Möglichkeiten haben.

GoMoPa-Opfer können mich jederzeit in meinem Londoner Büro oder unter bernd@ebizz.tv erreichen

Gemeinsam sind wir noch stärker und kämpfen für eine bessere Zukunft !

Enjoy !

Herzlichst Ihr

Magister Bernd Pulch

Zensur: Googles Arnd Haller liess Indexierung von http://www.berndpulch.org stoppen

Liebe Leser,

Dies war der harmlose Auslöser (siehe unten)- Während wir Stalking-Opfer über Monate von STASI “GoMoPa” – unter Beihilfe von Google gemobbt, gestalkt und verleumdet werden, ist Google-Haller selber eine Mimose – Aber die Geschichte zeigt: Gerade Zensur macht die zensierte Information noch interessanter.

In diesem Sinen Danke ! Arnd Haller

DAS SYSTEM “GoMoPa”-Google – Opfer: “Skrupellose Internet-Täter ohne Moral vernichten unsere Existenz”

ARND HALLER “GOOGLE”-”GoMoPa”-STASI-Opfer haben bei ihm keine Chance – Ein Mann ohne Moral, sagen viele betroffene Opfer

mehr unter

http://www.victims-opfer.com/?p=17663

So wollte SJB-Bennewirtz für die fingierte STASI-“GoMoPa” !!!! Artikel bei uns löschen – So eng arbeiten SJB und “GoMoPa” zusammen

Subject:   Request
From:   “P. Schmitz” <p.schmitz@deinguterruf.de>
Date:   Fri, July 1, 2011 12:18 pm
To:   office@ebizz.tv
Priority:   Normal
Options:   View Full Header | View Printable Version  | Download this as a file
Dear madams, dear sirs,

by order of our customer SJB Fonds Skyline OHG we are kindly asking you
to remove some entries on your website thetvnet.com. The
topicality and the
correctness of these entries are no longer up to date. It is a major
concern of our customer to see them removed:

immobilien-vertraulich.com/law/7279-die-killer-bibel-toxdat--die-900-seiten-stasi-mordstudie-von-gomopa-mastermind-ehrenfried-stelzer.html
immobilien-vertraulich.com/law/7277-sjb-fonds-opfer-sven-babyface-schmidt-als-chef-terrorist-von-europas-gefaehrlichster-internet-kriminellen-bande-enttarnt-.html
immobilien-vertraulich.com/law/7268-der-beweis-tatsaechlich-vorbestrafter-serienbetrueger-klausmaurischat-gomopa-hat-eigenes-kinder-portal-.html
immobilien-vertraulich.com/law/7264-die-killer-bibel-toxdat--die-900-seiten-stasi-mordstudie-von-gomopa-mastermind-ehrenfried-stelzer.html
immobilien-vertraulich.com/law/7262-sjb-fonds-opfer-sven-babyface-schmidt-als-chef-terrorist-von-europas-gefaehrlichster-internet-kriminellen-bande-enttarnt-.html
immobilien-vertraulich.com/law/7224-die-killer-bibel-toxdat-die-900-seiten-stasi-mordstudie-von-gomopa-mastermind-ehrenfried-stelzer.html
immobilien-vertraulich.com/law/7223-opfer-sven-schmidt-als-chef-terrorist-von-europas-gefaehrlichster-internet-kriminellen-bande-enttarnt.html
immobilien-vertraulich.com/law/7217-der-beweis-tatsaechlich-vorbestrafter-serienbetrueger-klausmaurischat-gomopa-hat-eigenes-kinder-portal-.html
immobilien-vertraulich.com/law/7212-die-killer-bibel-toxdat-die-900-seiten-stasi-mordstudie-von-gomopa-mastermind-ehrenfried-stelzer.html
immobilien-vertraulich.com/law/7210-opfer-sven-schmidt-als-chef-terrorist-von-europas-gefaehrlichster-internet-kriminellen-bande-enttarnt.html
immobilien-vertraulich.com/law/7203-der-beweis-tatsaechlich-vorbestrafter-serienbetrueger-klausmaurischat-gomopa-hat-eigenes-kinder-portal-.html
immobilien-vertraulich.com/law/7200-opfer-die-killer-bibel-toxdat-die-900-seiten-stasi-mordstudie-von-gomopa-mastermind-ehrenfried-stelzer.html
immobilien-vertraulich.com/law/7189-opfer-die-killer-bibel-toxdat--die-900-seiten-stasi-mordstudie-von-gomopa-mastermind-ehrenfried-stelzer.html
immobilien-vertraulich.com/law/7120--klaus-maurischats-gomopa-cybermoerder-leichen-und-falschmeldungen-plastern-ihren-weg--nicht-nur-im-internet.html
immobilien-vertraulich.com/boerse-ipo-reit/7119--der-mehrfach-vorbestrafte-serienbetrueger-und-mutmassliche-paederast-klaus-maurischat-und-seine-neue-qwirecard-enteq.html

We hope you can manage the removal of these entries according to the wish
of our customer contemporarily.These entries and similar ones cause
major problems for our customer.
We wanna thank you for your appreciation, for further information
please visit our website deinguterruf.de. (the english version is
still under construction).

In case you are not the right receipt for this request, it would be
very kind if you can name the correct person in charge.
If you have further questions concerning this case or our services in
general, please contact me.
It would be a great pleasure to receive a positive feedback.


With kind regards,

-- 
Mit freundlichen Grüßen,


P. Schmitz
DEIN GUTER RUF.DE

Ein Projekt der
MoveVision GmbH

Alfredstraße 341
45133 ESSEN
Tel: 0201-2489452
E-mail: p.schmitz (at) deinguterruf.de

MoveVision – GmbH - HRB 22121
Geschäftsführer: Martin Lux - Steuernummer: DE228746207

INTERESSANT - BENEWIRTZ WOLLTE HIERMIT AUSSCHLIESSLICH "GoMoPa"-KRITISCHE ARTIKEL LÖSCHEN UND KEINE KRITISCHEN ARTIKEL ÜBER SJB

„Die Killer-Bibel“ Toxdat – die 900 Seiten-Stasi-Mordstudie von „GoMoPa“-Mastermind Ehrenfried Stelzer

Benutzerbewertung: / 0
SchwachPerfekt 

Law
„Die Killer-Bibel“ Toxdat – die 900 Seiten-Stasi-Mordstudie von „GoMoPa“-Mastermind Ehrenfried Stelzer

Insider nennen ES die „Killer-Bibel“ – im Auftrag von Stasi Vizechef Gerhard Neiber verfasste „GoMoPa“-Mastermind, Ehrenfried Stelzer („Professor Mord“) eine präzise Studie, wie man am Besten den perfekten Mord begeht.

http://www.ddrgestapo.de/
http://www.spiegel.de/spiegel/print/d-13395385.html

Damit haben die Stelzer-Adepten des „NACHRICHTENDIENSTES“ „GoMoPa“ das richtige „Know-how“. Insider verdächtigen „GoMoPa“ des Mordes an Heinz Gerlach (siehe unten). Stasi-Oberst Ehrenfried Stelzer ist ein guter Bekannter, ja sogar „Oberster Anlegerschützer“ bei der DIAS,  des „Anlegerschutz-Anwaltes“ Jochen Resch.
ES, die über 900 Seiten starke Studie der Humboldt-Universität unter dem Titel “Toxdat” führt jede erdenkliche Art auf, wie Menschen mit Gift umgebracht werden können. Die für die Stasi entstandene Ausarbeitung aus dem Jahr 1988 nennt mehr als 200 toxische und strahlende Substanzen und beschreibt detailliert, wie diese eingesetzt werden könnten. Im Kapitel “Schädigung durch Beibringung radioaktiver Stoffe” werden besonders gefährliche Radionuklide genannt: von Strontium-90 bis Plutonium-238, aber auch Mikromengen abgebrannter Brennstäbe aus Kernkraftwerken.
Aus den Papieren erfuhren die Geheimdienstler, welche Wirkung ein Einsatz dieser Stoffe beim Menschen hätte. Von einer kombinierten Schädigung war die Rede. Der biologische Effekt resultiere aus einem chemischen Gift und einer physikalischen Wirkung. Beigebracht in Speisen und Getränken könnten sie zu Siechtum führende Blut-/Knochenmarkschäden und Krebs bewirken. Das sei natürlich abhängig gewesen von der psycho-physischen Reaktion der Einzelperson, sagte Fuchs in einem Interview, in dem er die Möglichkeit einschloß, daß durch Strahlung gesundheitliche Schäden verursacht werden können, nicht bei allen Gefangenen, aber bei denen, von denen man glaubt, es machen zu müssen, zu sollen, zu dürfen, auf Befehl. Die Wissenschaftler der Humboldt-Uni nannten das eine Liquidationsmethode mit hohem Verschleierungspotential durch spät einsetzende unspezifische Initialsymptomatik.
Die Existenz von Kritikern vernichten, das war eine Aufgabe der Stasi. Der Rechtsmediziner Prof. Thomas Daldrup von der Universität Düsseldorf hat die sogenannte .Toxdat.-Studie der DDR untersucht . eine 900 Seiten starke Datenbank über Giftmordmöglichkeiten. Hier ist detailliert beschrieben wie sich selbst Laien Gifte beschaffen können und wie man einen Mord am besten verschleiert.
Prof. Thomas Daldrup, Präsident Gesellschaft für Toxikologische und Forensische Chemie:
.Hier ist so ein Beispiel für einen Stoff, den will ich nicht erwähnen. .Dieser Stoff erfüllt in hohem Maße Kriterien für ein zum perfekten Mord geeignetes Gift.. Also, das kann man doch gar nicht anders lesen, als dass hier eine Anleitung zum perfektem Mord mit Gift gegeben wird. Hier ist es mal ganz klar ausgedrückt, aber das ganze Buch ist gefüllt mit solchen Informationen..
Hinweise auf die Verschleierung provozierter Unfälle finden sich ebenfalls in Toxdat: .Vortäuschung von Verkehrsunfällen durch Auslösung von sekundenschneller Bewusstlosigkeit mittels Minigasgenerator in Belüftungsschächten von PKW..
Da ist zum Beispiel der rätselhafte Verkehrsunfall des ehemaligen DDR-Fußballspielers Lutz Eigendorf im Jahr 1983. Vier Jahre zuvor war er nach einem Spiel in der Bundesrepublik nicht in die DDR zurückgekehrt. Er war ein leidenschaftlicher Autofahrer, seine Fahrweise risikovoll, das notierten die Spitzel der Stasi im Westen. Kurz vor seinem Verkehrsunfall stoppt die Stasi seine Fahrtzeit und die genaue Streckenführung seines täglichen Wegs vom Stadion nach Hause.
Zum Unfallhergang tauchen vor zwei Jahren neue Hinweise auf. Wurde Eigendorf gezielt geblendet? In den Giftakten der Stasi heißt es: .verblitzen, Eigendorf.. Hatte man Eigendorf heimlich ein pupillenerweiterndes Mittel verabreicht?
Die Staatsanwaltschaft Berlin kann Fragen dazu nicht beantworten, da eine Obduktion nicht angeordnet wurde, auch nach Auftauchen der neuen Stasidokumente nicht.
Jörg Berger, Fußballtrainer Alemannia Aachen:
.Hier ist alles gesagt!.
Die Stasi wusste, dass Berger Angst hatte vor einem möglichen Auftragsmord, um weitere Fußballer vor einer Flucht abzuhalten:
.BERGER bekundete angeblich (…), daß es ihm nicht so ergehen soll wie EIGENDORF..
Die Stasi glaubte, dass Berger der Drahtzieher war für die Republikflucht mehrerer Fußballer. Als Berger dann Mitte der 80er Jahre als Trainer auf dem Sprung in die 1. Bundesliga war und sich die DDR-Sportler Falko Götz und Dirk Schlegel nach Westdeutschland absetzten, schien Berger für die DDR unerträglich zu werden.
.Im operativen Vorgang .Ball. wurde operativ herausgearbeitet, daß BERGER wesentlichen Anteil am Verrat von GÖTZ und SCHLEGEL hatte..
Jörg Berger, Fußballtrainer:
.Es ist auch in diesen Aussagen zu erkennen, dass man mich berufsunfähig machen wollte oder dass man mich kaltstellen wollte in der Richtung, dass ich nicht mehr als Trainer arbeite, um da vielleicht auch nicht mehr die Einflüsse auf Spieler oder vielleicht sogar auf Trainer zu haben..
1986 litt Berger unter rätselhaften Lähmungserscheinungen. Der Erklärungsversuch damals: eine Virusinfektion. Im Auftrag von report AUS MÜNCHEN hat der Rechtsmediziner Prof. Wolfgang Eisenmenger vor dem Hintergrund von Toxdat Bergers Krankenakten analysiert. Jetzt scheint festzustehen: Berger wurde vergiftet.
Prof. Wolfgang Eisenmenger, Klinikum Innenstadt der Universität München, Institut für Rechtsmedizin:
.Wenn man die laborchemischen Befunde aus dem Krankenhaus kritisch würdigt, muss man sagen, es spricht in Nachhinein nichts für eine durchgemachte Virusentzündung. Da die Schwermetallvergiftungen nicht gezielt untersucht worden sind, kann man sie aufgrund der Laborbefunde nicht ausschließen. (…) Es kommen . wenn man das Krankheitsbild würdigt . vor allem Schwermetalle aus der Gruppe der Bleiverbindungen und der Arsenverbindungen in Betracht..
Die Anleitung, eine Arsenikvergiftung zu verschleiern . liefert ebenfalls wieder die DDR-Giftstudie Toxdat.
Frühere Stasi-Mitarbeiter wollten auch ihn ausschalten, das glaubt der Bundestagsabgeordnete Hartmut Büttner aus Hannover. 1995 hatte er einen mysteriösen Autounfall, der ihn beinahe das Leben kostete. Nach der Wiedervereinigung hatte der Abgeordnete zu den Hintermännern der .Toxdat.-Studie recherchiert und sich sehr für die Offenlegung der Stasi-Akten durch die Gauck-Behörde eingesetzt.
Hartmut Büttner, CDU-Bundestagsabgeordneter 1991:
.Ich halte es für skandalös, dass der mit dem Sektglas parlierende Altsozialist den Insassen von Bautzen völlig verdrängt hat..
Als Büttner ´95 auf gerader, staubtrockener Straße verunglückte, findet keine Filigranuntersuchung des Wagens statt. Während er im Koma liegt, gibt die Polizei das Schrottauto frei. Eine Speditionsfirma zahlt dafür eilig das Sechsfache seines Werts. Büttner wurde mitgeteilt:
Hartmut Büttner, CDU-Bundestagsabgeordneter:
“Dieses Auto ist in der Tat ins .solvente Ausland. . in diesem Fall nach Polen – geschickt worden. Und in Polen wurde dieser Wagen nach einer Woche als gestohlen gemeldet..
Viele Unfälle und Erkrankungen von ehemaligen DDR-Systemkritikern scheinen noch lange nicht geklärt.
„Die Unterwanderung durch die Cyber-STASI bekommt eine neue Qualität. Die laut Bürgel seit mehr als 2 Jahren insolvente “GoMoPa” GmbH will Unternehmerberatung machen.Was sich wie ein letzter Scherz der Pleite-STASI-Leute anhört, ist tatsächlich ernst gemeint, todernst“, schreiben die SJB-GoMoPa-Opfer auf ihrer Homepage.
“Wer sich in die Fänge der “GoMoPa”-STASI-Krake begibt, wird dann ausgequetscht von den Serienbetrügern wie eine Zitrone” , warnt SJB-GoMoPa-Sprecher Heinz Friedrich vor den Machenschaften des Ostberliner “NACHRICHTENDIENSTES” “GoMoPa”.
Hein Friedrich: „Grospurig verkündet der dubiose „NACHRICHTENDIENST“  „GoMoPa“ auf seiner Webpage: Wir beschaffen Informationen und Verbindungen, werten sie aus, kanalisieren die Quintessenz und transferieren diese an unsere Klientel, die mit den Erkenntnissen geldwerte Vorteile erwirtschaftet, welche nicht selten im sechsstelligen Bereich liegen. Ganz einfach also. Diese Art von Dienstleistung ist im deutschsprachigen Raum neu.“
„Diese Dienstleistung ist so neu denn doch nicht, denn im Geheimen arbeitet der „NACHRICHTENDIENST“ „GoMoPa“ bereits seit Jahren als Cyber-Stasi“, sagt „GoMoPa“-Experte Thomas Wilhelm.
„Schon der Gründer von „GoMoPa“, Stasi-Oberst Ehrenfried Stelzer“, versuchte so die deutsche Wirtschaft zu unterwandern, berichtet Wilhelm.“
„Das “Internationale Institut für Wirtschaftssicherheit zu Berlin” soll, so versichern der ehemalige Top-Nachrichtendienstler (West) und sein Kompagnon (Ost) unisono, aus “ideellen Motiven” Industriebetriebe in Fragen der Wirtschaftssicherheit beraten. “Selbstlos” (Satzung) wollen Hellenbroich und Stelzer für “störungsfreie wirtschaftliche” Ost-West-Beziehungen eintreten und zum Wohl der Unternehmer wirken: Wirtschaftskriminalität abwehren helfen, über Daten- und Banksicherheit aufklären“,s chreibt der „Spiegele“ bereits 1990 über die damals geplante Zusammenarbeit zwischen Stelzer und Ex-Verfasungschef Hellenbroich („Spiegel“ Nr.51/1990).
Deep Throat, ein „GoMoPa“-Insider, berichtet: „Das Konzept stammt noch von Stasi-Oberst Stelzer. Neu daran ist nur, wie viel krimineller Energie das jetzt im Cyberspace umgesetzt wird.“
ZDF-Doku: „Sonderauftrag Mord. Die Geheimnisse der Stasi-Der tödliche Arm der DDR“

In der ZDF-Dokumention „Sonderauftrag Mord. Die Geheimnisse der Stasi“Der tödliche Arm der DDR werden die tödlichen Taten der Stasi um den „Ersten Kriminologen der DDR“, Ehrenfried Stelzer, enthüllt.
„Focus“ schreibt : „In der Reportage „Sonderauftrag Mord“ beleuchten ZDF-Filmemacher die geheimnisvollsten Missionen der geheimnisvollsten Behörde der ehemaligen DDR: die Tötungseinsätze des Ministeriums für Staatssicherheit. Genauer gesagt: die vermeintlichen Tötungseinsätze. Denn Genaues weiß man (fast) nicht. Zum tödlichen Treiben der Stasi gibt es vor allem Mutmaßungen und selten wirklich belastbare Beweise. Was die Sache nur umso mysteriöser und noch spannender macht… Dass dies nicht alles nur Hirngespinste sind, dokumentiert mindestens ein Fall, in dem ein Mordauftrag der Stasi gerichtsfest belegt ist. Wolfgang Welsch war in der DDR Schauspieler und Regimegegner. Sieben Jahre verbrachte er in Gefängnissen, bevor die BRD ihn freikaufte. Im Westen baute Welsch eine Fluchthilfeorganisation auf, die vielen DDR-Bürgern ein Entkommen aus dem real existierenden Drangsalismus ermöglichte – ihn selbst aber erst recht zum Feind der Stasi stempelte.

Die Ost-Geheimen setzten falsche Freunde auf ihn an. Peter H. einer von ihnen, begleitete Welsch mit Frau und Kind im Urlaub nach Israel. Dort mischte der Agent Rattengift ins Essen, was Welsch beinahe das Leben kostete. Im sogenannten Bulettenprozess wurde dieser Fall konkret juristisch aufgearbeitet. Und weil dies so ist, entspringt das Thema dieser guten und eindrucksvoll inszenierten ZDF-Dokumentation leider nicht einer blühenden Phantasie. Sondern gehört ins gesamtdeutsche Geschichtsbuch.“
Das Gift hat Methode bei den Stasi-Mördern.

Zuerst nahm der aus der DDR geflohene Fußballlehrer Jörg Berger nur ein Kribbeln in den Zehen wahr, dann in den ganzen Füßen und Händen. Hinzu kamen Fieber, Übelkeit und ein allgemeines Schwächegefühl. Hatte die Stasi ihn vergiftet?
Als er seine Gliedmaßen kaum noch spürte und nicht mehr laufen konnte, musste Jörg Berger für lange Zeit seinen Beruf aufgeben. Eine Erklärung für seine schwere Krankheit im Jahr 1986 hatte der populäre Trainer Berger viele Jahre lang nicht, genauso wenig konnte er sich erklären, warum sich an seinem neuen Auto plötzlich ein Rad löste.

“Frisierte” Akten
Erst als er nach der Wende seine Stasi-Akten sichtete, kam ihm ein schrecklicher Verdacht: Steckte der DDR-Geheimdienst hinter seiner Krankheit und dem mysteriösen Autounfall? Wollte man ihn “nur” einschüchtern? Oder gab es gar einen “offiziellen” Tötungsplan?

Wie weit ist die Stasi gegangen? Führende Stasi-Offiziere bestreiten bis heute Morde im Auftrag des Ministeriums für Staatssicherheit, der Nachweis ist schwierig. Viele Akten wurden kurz vor der Wende “frisiert”, brisantes Material hektisch vernichtet. Doch die Indizienkette, die Mordabsichten plausibel erscheinen lässt, wird immer dichter. Jörg Berger wird die Wahrheit nie erfahren. Im Juni dieses Jahres ist er an Krebs gestorben.

In den Osten entführt
Die bisherigen Erkenntnisse führen in die 1950er Jahre zurück, als die Stasi “Verräter” aus dem Westen in den Osten entführen ließ. Manche wurden nach Schauprozessen hingerichtet, andere blieben für immer verschwunden. Nach dem Bau der Mauer bildete die Stasi dann “Kämpfer” aus, die auf einem geheimen Truppenübungsplatz das Liquidieren von Menschen übten.

Die Stasi experimentierte auch mit Sprengstoff. Für Übungszwecke wird ein Wartburg in die Luft gejagt (nachgestellte Spielszene). Wurde diese Erfahrungen auch bei Anschlägen im Westen “angewandt?”

In der Stasiunterlagenbehörde in Berlin finden sich konkrete Mordplanungen: Der geflohene Grenzoffizier Rudi Thurow sollte 1963 mit einem 1.000 Gramm schweren Hammer erschlagen werden, bei einem anderen Fahnenflüchtigen plante die Stasi, einen Sprengsatz unter dem Sattel seines Mopeds zu montieren.
Zitat
„Das Liquidieren beinhaltet die physische Vernichtung von Einzelpersonen oder von Personengruppen. Erreichbar durch: Das Erschießen, Erstechen, Verbrennen, Zersprengen, Strangulieren, Erschlagen, Vergiften, Ersticken.“
BStU: Ausbildungsbuch des MfS, 1974
Ex-Stasimitarbeiter berichten
Ab den 1970er Jahren wurden Mordplanungen nicht mehr aufgeschrieben – es gab sie aber dennoch. Gegenüber dem ZDF berichtet ein ehemaliger MfS-Mitarbeiter von Plänen, den geflohenen Geheimdienstagenten Werner Stiller zu ermorden, und in einem anderen Fall gibt es ein Geständnis eines ehemaligen MfS-Offiziers, der den Auftrag hatte, einen Fluchthelfer zu vergiften.
Noch immer kommen Neuigkeiten ans Licht: So hat ein Stasi-Spitzel Anfang dieses Jahres bestätigt, dass es tatsächlich Mordpläne gegen den geflohenen Fußballspieler Lutz Eigendorf gab.
Die ZDF-Dokumentation “Sonderauftrag Mord” widerlegt die Legende der Stasiführung, das MfS hätte mit Auftragsmorden nichts zu tun. Zeugenaussagen, Archivfunde und investigative Recherchen beweisen, mit welch tödlicher Energie die Stasi gegen “Feinde” des DDR-Regimes vorgegangen ist. Der verstorbene Fußballtrainer Jörg Berger gab für diese ZDF-Produktion sein letztes großes Interview.

Auch heute noch gehen die alten Seilschaften der Stasi, wie der „NACHRICHTENDIENST“ „GoMoPa“ mit Stasi-Methoen vor. Das beweisen auch ihre Droh-Emails gegen unsere Journalisten (siehe berndpulch.org).
Bei der gezielten Unterwanderung der westdeutschen Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft wird auch heute noch mit der „Operativen Psychologie“ der Stasi gearbeitet. Die alten Stasi-Schergen sind immer noch aktiv, wie das Beispiel des millionenfachen Dioxin-Vergifters und Stasi-Mannes Siegfried Siewert zeigt. Sein Namensvetter Stasi-Mann „Siegfried Sievert“ ist in Wirklichkeit der vorbestrafte Serienbetrüger Klaus Maurischat.
Deep Throat, Berlin: „Für“GoMoPa“ und deren alte Stasi-Kader wie dem psychotischen Peter Ehlers ist jedes Mittel recht, das in ihrem Stasi-Arsenal lagert, um Gegner auszuschalten und die macht im Finanzmarkt zu übernehmen.“
Wie die millionenfache DiOXIN-Vergiftung zeigt schrecken die Stasi-Seilschaften vor nichts zurück, wenn sie glauben, es sei ihren dubiosen Zielen nützlich. Ein erschütterndes Beispiel hierfür ist auch das Schicksal des Stasi-Opfers Joerg Berger.
Joerg Berger wurde von der Stasi mit Arsen und Blei vergiftet. In seiner Biographie schildert, der wohl auch deswegen  viel zu früh verstorbenen Fussball-Trainer Jörg Berger die Tatumstände.
„Meine zwei Halbzeiten“ – so heißt seine Biographie.
Zu seiner Biographie sagt Berger: „Es ist genau der richtige Zeitpunkt, meine deutsch-deutsche Geschichte aufzuschreiben. Weil ich jetzt die Hälfte meines Lebens im Osten und die andere Hälfte im Westen gelebt habe.“
Es geht um seine spektakuläre Flucht 1979 aus der DDR, seine Krebs-Erkrankung, sein Leben als Fußball-Retter.
Wie die Stasi ihn im Westen jagte.
Seit ich 1979 in den Westen geflohen war, verfolgte ich aufmerksam wie Lutz Eigendorf sich verhielt, der eine Woche vor mir Republikflucht begangen hatte. Er trat sehr provokativ auf, besonders im Fernsehen, kritisierte den Staat drüben massiv, so dass ich mich fragte, wie lange sich die Stasi das gefallen lassen würde.
Ich hatte ihn gewarnt: „Mensch, Lutz, hör auf mit diesem Quatsch. Wenn deine alte Mannschaft Dynamo in Hamburg spielt, dann geh nicht zu deinen ehemaligen Kollegen ins Hotel oder an die Bar, nur um ihnen zu zeigen, wie gut es dir im Westen geht.“
Eigendorf, der sicher einer der talentiertesten von den geflüchteten DDR-Spielern war, zeigte keine Einsicht, wollte keinen Rat annehmen.
Als er am 5. März 1983 einen Autounfall hatte, bei dem er lebensgefährlich verletzt wurde und zwei Tage später starb, konnte ich das nur in einem Zusammenhang mit seinem provokanten Verhalten sehen. Die Obduktion ergab, dass er einen hohen Alkoholgehalt im Blut hatte (2,2 Promille/ d.Red.), am Abend vorher soll er aber laut Aussagen von Vereinskollegen nur wenig getrunken haben.
Eigendorf wurde von der Stasi verblitzt.
Heute, nach über 25 Jahren, spricht vieles für einen Stasi-Mord. Einen absoluten Beweis gibt es jedoch nicht. Neue Untersuchungen legen nahe, dass die Stasi Lutz möglicherweise heimlich ein pupillenerweiterndes Mittel verabreicht hat, um ihn gezielt zu blenden. In seinen Stasiakten steht „Eigendorf verblitzt“.
Von seinem Unfall-Tag an ließ ich regelmäßig mein Auto bei verschiedenen Werkstätten überprüfen. Plötzlich fielen mir auch einige merkwürdige Vorfälle wieder ein. Einmal hatte sich bei Tempo 160 ein Rad gelöst, mehrmals waren meine Reifen zerstochen worden. Jetzt konnte ich mir einen Reim darauf machen. Ich hatte eine Ahnung davon bekommen, wie weit das MfS (Ministerium für Staatssicherheit, die Red.) gehen konnte.
Nur mit Gewalt und Drogen hätte man mich in die DDR zurückgekriegt
Am 11. Oktober 1984 rief mich völlig überraschend Bernd Stange von einem Hotel in Luxemburg an. Dort bereitete er als Fußball-Nationaltrainer der DDR seine Mannschaft auf ein WM-Quali-Spiel vor. (…) Eigentlich hätte mich diese Kontaktaufnahme nachdenklich stimmen können, doch mir kam dergleichen nicht in den Sinn.
Was ich erst durch das Buch „Trainer zwischen den Welten“ von Heiko Mallwitz erfuhr: die Staatssicherheit hatte die Absicht, mich mit Stanges Hilfe in die DDR zurückzuführen, besser gesagt, zu entführen. Ich frage mich das auch noch heute, wie man das bewerkstellige wollte. Rhetorisch war Stange gut, aber so gut, dass er mich mit Worten dazu hätte bringen können, freiwillig nach drüben zurückzugehen – nein, das war nicht vorstellbar. Also blieben, in meiner Schlussfolgerung nur Gewalt und Drogen.
Jörg Berger wurde am 13. Oktober 1944 in Gotenhafen bei Danzig geboren. Seine Mutter floh mit ihm im Januar 1945 vor der herannahenden Roten Armee, verzichtete im letzten Moment auf die Reise mit der „Wilhelm Gustloff“. Ihr Glück. Das Schiff wurde versenkt (9000 Tote).
Seine Flucht, seine Klubs, seine Erfolge Jörg Berger wurde am 13. Oktober 1944 in Gotenhafen bei Danzig geboren. Seine Mutter floh mit ihm im Januar 1945 vor der herannahenden Roten Armee, verzichtete im letzten Moment auf die Reise mit der „Wilhelm Gustloff“. Ihr Glück. Das Schiff wurde versenkt (9000 Tote).Seine Flucht, seine Klubs, seine Erfolge Er wuchs in Leipzig auf, wurde Jugend-Nationalspieler der DDR, spielte für Lok Leipzig.Seine Flucht, seine Klubs, seine Erfolge 1972 erster Trainer-Job bei Carl Zeiss Jena (mit Hans Meyer), später der B-Jugendauswahl der DDR.Seine Flucht, seine Klubs, seine Erfolge 1979 Flucht bei einem Länderspiel in Jugoslawien.Seine Flucht, seine Klubs, seine Erfolge 12 Klubs als Trainer (Düsseldorf, Kassel, Hannover, SC Freiburg, Frankfurt, Köln, Schalke, Basel/Schweiz, Karlsruhe, noch mal Frankfurt, Bursaspor/Türkei, Aachen, Rostock).Seine Flucht, seine Klubs, seine Erfolge Größte Erfolge: Last-Minute-Rettung mit Frankfurt (1999), Pokalfinale mit Aachen (2004).
1 von 6
Meine Gliedmaßen waren wie tot.
1986 war ich vom Zweitligisten Hessen Kassel zum Erstligisten Hannover gewechselt. Das war etwas, was die Stasi kaum gewollt haben konnte. Seitdem stand ich noch mehr in den Schlagzeilen.
Zu diesem Zeitpunkt nahm ich ein Kribbeln wahr, zuerst in der linken Großzehe, dann insgesamt in den Füßen und Händen. Hinzu kam Fieber, Übelkeit und ein allgemeines Schwächegefühl. Ich dachte, ich hätte mir einen Virus eingefangen oder vielleicht zu viel Stress.
Das Kribbeln hörte nicht auf, wurde von Tag zu Tag schlimmer. Meine Gliedmaßen spürte ich schließlich kaum noch, alles war taub, wie tot. Erst als ich nicht mehr laufen konnte, suchte ich einen Spezialisten auf.
Eine Untersuchung nach der anderen wurde unternommen – doch eine zufriedenstellende Erklärung fand sich nicht.
Trotzdem ließ mich fortan das diffuse Gefühl nicht mehr los, dass hinter dieser Krankheit vielleicht doch etwas anderes steckte als eine körperliche oder seelische Ursache.
Blei- und Arsenverbindungen wurden mir ins Essen oder Trinken getan.
Nach der Wende forderte man mich auf, meine Krankenakten an Professor Dr. Wolfgang Eisenmenger zu schicken, tätig am Institut für Rechtsmedizin der Münchner Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität. Er kam zu dem Ergebnis, dass es sich aufgrund der darin beschriebenen Symptome wahrscheinlich nicht um eine Viruserkrankung, sondern um eine Vergiftung gehandelt habe. Er konkretisierte dies auch noch in Hinsicht auf eine Schwermetallvergiftung aus der Gruppe der Blei- und Arsenverbindungen.
Die Stasi-Akten geben darüber keine klaren Auskünfte. Das einzige, was aus den Akten selber hervorgeht, ist, dass in der Zeit „agressives Verhalten gegenüber dem Feindbild Berger“ angesagt war. In meiner Lesart: Es ging ihnen bei mir nicht gerade um Mord, sondern darum, mich beruflich außer Gefecht zu setzen. Nicht umsonst hatte man mir wohl ein Gift gegeben, das Lähmungserscheinungen auslöst. Dennoch: In zu hoher Dosierung hätte es meine Gliedmaßen absterben lassen, aber auch zum Tode führen können. Dann wäre es doch ein Auftragsmord gewesen. Mit großer Wahrscheinlichkeit hat mir jemand das Mittel in ein Getränk oder ins Essen getan. Ich kann von Glück sagen, dass ich nicht Lutz Eigendorfs Schicksal teilte.
Ich kann Stange nicht verzeihen.
Ein Einblick in meine Stasiakten konnte Aufschluss darüber geben, wer Freund und wer Feind war. Insgesamt zählte ich 21 regelmäßig auftretende offizielle Informelle Mitarbeiter, die man auf mich angesetzt hatte. Davon neun im Osten. Erschreckend war, schwarz auf weiß zu lesen, wie nah die Stasi im Westen an mir dran war. Das Schlimmste jedoch war folgende Gewissheit: Zwei mir nahestehende Menschen hatten mich verraten. Rolf G. (ein Freund, mit dem Berger Ski gefahren ist und zeltete, die Red.) und Bernd Stange.
Stange hat denunziert und verraten, Menschen, die ihm nahestanden, möglicherweise in Gefahr gebracht, um daraus persönliche Vorteile zu ziehen. Dadurch war er wohl auch DDR-Nationaltrainer geworden.
Beiden kann ich nicht verzeihen. Denn die Enttäuschung, von zwei Freunden verraten worden zu sein, belastet mich noch heute.“

Informant: Wie die Stasi die Rentenkasse des „Klassenfeindes“ platt machen will

Ein Informant der SJB-GoMoPa-Opfer spielte brisantes Material zu: „Wie die Stasi ihre eigene Republikflucht plante und durchführte oder Wie machen wir dem Klassenfeind seine Rentenkasse “platt”.
Auf über 30 Seiten wir die Unterwanderung der BRD durch die Stasi in diesem internen Bericht aus dem Jahre 1989 detailliert darlegt. Den Originalbericht finden Sie unter http://sjb-fonds-opfer.com/?p=12919
Vor allem die deutschen Rentenkassen, Stiftungen, Vermögensverwalter sollten so unterwandert werden. Im selben Jahr 1989 gründet Gerd-Wilhelm Bennewirtz SJB.
Zitat: „„Wir saßen unter einem Apfelbaum und beschlossen, es für ein Jahr zu versuchen. Mehr als schief gehen konnte es nicht“, erinnert sich Bennewirtz.“ 1989 ist auch das erste Jahr in Peter Ehlers Xin-Biographie.
1989 war auch der Startpunkt für viel Stasi-Agenten „rüberzumachen – 1989 das Jahr der Wende.
Der „Spiegel“ schreibt: „Die Inoffiziellen Mitarbeiter (IM) wurden noch 1989 aus der DDR in den Westen geschickt.“
Zitat in Focus“: „Der Historiker Hubertus Knabe glaubt, dass die Gesellschaft im Westen intensiver als bisher angenommen von der Stasi beeinflusst war
FOCUS: In Ihrem Buch behaupten Sie, der Westen sei von der Stasi gelenkt und unterwandert gewesen. Muss die Geschichte der Bundesrepublik neu geschrieben werden?

Knabe: Sie muss neu geschrieben werden in Hinblick auf die Aktivitäten des DDR-Staatssicherheitsdienstes. Die Zeitgeschichtsforschung hat diese konspirative Dimension westdeutscher Vergangenheit bisher mit Schweigen übergangen. Doch egal, ob es um Politiker von FDP oder Grünen, die Friedensbewegung oder die 68er- Studentenrevolte geht – die Stasi hatte immer einen Fuß in der Tür.

FOCUS: War die Arbeit des MfS tatsächlich so effektiv? Ihr Kollege Helmut Müller-Enbergs konstatiert, Aufwand und Ergebnis der Stasi-Spionage hätten nicht selten in krassem Missverhältnis gestanden.

Knabe: Sicher hat es seitens der Stasi auch Wunschdenken über ihren Einfluss im Westen gegeben. Aber die Intensität der Unterwanderung ist erschreckend. Acht Bundestagsabgeordnete hatten MfS-Kontakte. Die Liste der als Informanten geführten Politiker reicht vom Berliner SDS-Sekretär Walter Barthel bis zum deutschlandpolitischen Sprecher der Grünen, Dirk Schneider. Mit ihrer Hilfe hatte es die DDR-Führung bis 1989 geschafft, im demokratischen Nachbarstaat zunehmend Akzeptanz zu finden bis hin zur Quasi-Anerkennung durch die Regierung.“

Zitatende
Der Niedergang der entkräfteten SED zog auch den Niedergang des MfS nach sich. Nicht zuletzt deshalb vermochte sich die Staatssicherheit gegenüber dem drohenden Zusammenbruch nicht zu wehren. Während des Umbruchs in der DDR richtete sich der Zorn weiter Kreise in der Bevölkerung maßgeblich gegen das MfS, das den Unterdrückungsapparat symbolisierte. Bei Demonstrationen wurde die Auflösung des MfS gefordert. E. Krenz, der Nachfolger Honeckers, wollte noch im November 1989 ein Gesetz über die Befugnisse des MfS erarbeiten lassen. Ministerpräsident H. Modrow ersetzte im November 1989 das MfS durch ein “Amt für Nationale Sicherheit”. Diese Nachfolgeorganisation wurde auf Druck des “Runden Tisches” durch einen Beschluss des Ministerrates im Dezember 1989 aufgelöst, wenngleich einzelne Strukturen fortbestanden – etwa bei der Beseitigung von Unterlagen. Die geplante Einrichtung eines “Verfassungsschutzes der DDR” und eines “Nachrichtendienstes der DDR” unterblieb nicht zuletzt aufgrund der Standhaftigkeit der Bürgerbewegungen und Bürgerkomitees. Der Sturm auf die Zentrale des MfS in der Normannenstraße am 15.1.1990 dürfte maßgeblich durch die Staatssicherheit inszeniert gewesen sein. Unter der Regierung de Maizière erfolgten weitere Maßnahmen zur Auflösung der Organe der Staatssicherheit. Als die DDR der BRD beitrat, war das MfS aufgelöst – ungeachtet des Fortwirkens entsprechender “Seilschaften”.
Diese Seilschaften benutzen und benutzen ihre alten Stasi-Methoden weiter zur Unterwanderung der deutschen Wirtschaft. Dies wird besonders deutlich an dem Versuch des Stasi-Obersten Ehrenfried Stelzer mit Ex-Verfassungsschutz Chef Hellenroich ein gemeinsames „Sicherheits-Unternehmen“ zu gründen sowie in den Aktivitäten der „GoMoPa“.
Deep Throat, Berlin: „Aus diesem Stasi-Umfeld“ der alten Seilschaften kommen die „GoMoPa“-Leute, aber auch der Ex-Stasi-Kader mit dem Tarnnamne „Peter Exxxx“ (anonymisiert), der heute noch mit Stasi-Methoden der „Operativen Psychologie“ arbeitet
Stasi-Oberst Ehrenfried Stelzer, „GoMoPa“-Mastermind und seine tödlichen Methoden
(Investment Magazin, Investment, Das Investment) DAS ORIGINAL – Deep Throat packt aus: „Der grosse Mann im Hintergrund, der „GoMoPa“ erfand, war Ehrenfried Stelzer, der „Erste Kriminologe der DDR“. Stasi-Insider nannten ihn auch „Professor Mord“.  Angeblich verstarb er am 10.2.2010 in Berlin im Alter von 78 Jahren.“
Der hochdekorierte Stasi-Oberst schrieb unter anderem „Kriminalistik und forensische Wissenschaften. Beiträge zur Theorie und Praxis der sozialistischen Kriminalistik und der forensischen Wissenschaften“. Dabei kannte sich Stelzer vor allem in der Praxis richtig gut aus. In der Praxis des Stasi-Auftragsmordes. Denn seine Stelle als Professor für Kriminologie an der kommunistischen Humbold-Universität war nur tarnung für den „Ersten Kriminologen der DDR“.
Für seine Arbeit wurde Stelzer mehrmals durch das MfS ausgezeichnet (Vgl. HA KuSch: Beurteilung des Genossen Dr. Ehrenfried. Stelzer vom 22.4.1965).
Die wissenschaftliche Erforschung mörderischer Todesarten wurde bei der Stasi gelehrt und gelernt (siehe Titelbild) – auch und gerade mit Dioxin.
Zur Tötung von Staatsfeinden gab es in der DDR viele Möglichkeiten; versuchen wir hier eine Systematisierung, wie sie sich aus Dokumenten – auch bisher nur uns vorliegenden (so u.a. die Fälle Eylert, Geißler, Höppner, Hübner, Krüger, Seum) – ableiten läßt.
1. Erschießen oder durch Minen töten
Die DDR-Grenztruppen dürften bis 1989 weit mehr als 200 Personen umgebracht haben (vgl. Filmer/Schwan 1991, Sauer/Plumeyer 1991). Die Zentrale Erfassungsstelle Salzgitter – die die SPD dem Druck der SED nachkommend schließen wollte! – ermittelte bis 1990 4.444 Fälle „von versuchten und vollendeten Tötungshandlungen“, um DDR-Flucht zu verhindern; etwa 700 Verletzte wurden registriert (Sauer/Plumeyer 1991, S. 79; vgl. Föhrig 1996).
2. Terrorurteile
Bis 1989 dürfte es in der DDR weit mehr als 200.000 politische Urteile und 10.000 Hinrichtungen gegeben haben.
3. Ermordung nach Verschleppung aus dem Operationsgebiet
(in der Regel Bundesrepublik Deutschland)
Fricke (pers. Ausk. 9/1996) schätzt die Zahl der vom SED-Sicherheitsdienst aus dem Bundesgebiet in die DDR Entführten auf 120 Überläufer aus dem MfS und 700 andere „Staatsfeinde“. Von den Überläufern dürften etwa ein Dutzend hingerichtet worden sein; zu den „Staatsfeinden“, die ihre Verschleppung nicht überlebt haben, gibt es noch keine Zahlen.
4. Direkte Liquidierung im Operationsgebiet und in der DDR
Z.B. durch Erschießen, Erdrosseln, Ertränken etc. (unter Vortäuschung eines Unfalls, eines Suizids oder eines „normalen“ Verbrechens).
5. Töten in Haftanstalten
6. Ermordung in Krankenhäusern
In der DDR wurden nicht nur frühgeborene Kinder in Kliniken passiv und aktiv getötet, sondern auch Staatsfeinde in Krankenanstalten umgebracht (z.B. bei Operationen und mittels anderer Methoden).
7. Tötung im Arbeitsprozeß
Z.B. durch Strahlenexposition, gesundheitsschädigende Tätigkeit u.a. bei Zwangsarbeit, Arbeitsunfälle.
8. Beauftragung westlicher Terroristen sowie anderer Schwerverbrecher
Z.B. mit Mord, Attentaten, Sabotage- und Terrorakten sowie Verschleppungen.
Erich Mielke – er war Mitglied des Politbüros der SED und oberster MfS-Führer – wiederholte in einer Kollegiumssitzung am 19. Februar 1982 warnend, was schon seit den 50er Jahren in der DDR gültige Praxis war (Tonbandprotokoll; zit. in Stasi intern, 1991, S. 213):
„Wir sind nicht davor gefeit, daß wir mal einen Schuft unter uns haben. Wenn ich das schon jetzt wüßte, würde er ab morgen nicht mehr leben. Kurzen Prozeß. Weil ich Humanist bin. Deshalb hab ich solche Auffassung. […] Das ganze Geschwafel, von wegen nicht hinrichten und nicht Todesurteil – alles Käse, Genossen. Hinrichten, wenn notwendig auch ohne Gerichtsurteil“ (Hervorhebung D.V.).
Politbüromitglied Mielke sagt hier nichts Neues; selten wurde jedoch das „Über-allen-Gesetzen-Stehen“, wurden die Brutalität und die Skrupellosigkeit dieser kriminellen Organisation von ihrem Chef selbst so treffend und offen gekennzeichnet. Mielke wollte abschrecken, weshalb auch die Verschleppungen und Tötungen von „Verrätern“ im MfS stets bekanntgegeben und „zum Gegenstand einer eingehenden Belehrung“ gemacht wurden (Befehl Nr. 78/54 des Staatssekretärs für Staatssicherheit, Ernst Wollweber, vom 5. März 1954; zit. bei Fricke 1994, S. 260). Schon 1954/55 hatte Wollweber deutlich gemacht (alles zit. bei Fricke 1994, S. 260):
Szenenwechsel:
Dann nach der Wende versucht Stelzer mit Ex-Verfassungschutz-Chef Hellenbroich ein gemeinsames „Security“-Unternehmen für deutsche Firmen aufzuziehen. Nachdem der „Spiegel“ darüber berichtet, zieht sich Hellenbroich zurück.
„Das herausragendste Beispiel für eine “friedliche Koexistenz” ist die Firma IHS in Berlin.Inhaber:Heribert Hellenbroich, ehemaliger Präsident des Bundesamtes für Verfassungsschutz, gestolpert über den Fall TIEDGE und Professor Ehrenfried STELZER, besser Oberst Stelzer,ehemals Leiter der Sektion Kriminalistik der Humboldt-Universität Berlin.Professor Stelzer erstellte für Stasi-Oberst Stelzer JEDES von der Stasi gewünschte Gutachten“, bezeugt Rainer Schubert, Berlin.

Stattdessen gründet Stelzer den „NACHRICHTENDIENST“ „GoMoPa“, so der Insider Deep Throat. Jahrelang halten die Ermittler wie auch die Opfer die Gruppe um das „Aushängeschild“, den tatsächlich verurteilten Serienstraftäter nur für eine „normale“ Kriminellen-Bande. Die jüngsten Aufdeckungen zeigen indes, dass hier eine organisierte Gruppe die Wirtschaft unterwanderte. So traute sich in 2009 auch „GoMoPa“-Mastermind, Stasi-Obrist Ehrenfried Stelzer wieder in die Öffentlichkeit.
Das nächste öffentliche Auftreten von Stasi-Oberst Stelzer ist dann wieder im „Spiegel“ ein Thema:
„Das Deutsche Institut für Anlegerschutz (DIAS) hat als neuen geschäftsführenden Vorstand Ehrenfried Stelzer berufen. Das berichtet der “Spiegel” in seiner am Montag erscheinenden Ausgabe. Bis zur Wende war Stelzer Leiter der Sektion Kriminalistik an der Ost-Berliner Humboldt-Universität. Die Sektion galt als Stasi-Hochburg, Stelzer selbst diente der Stasi Jahrzehnte als “Offizier im besonderen Einsatz”, schreibt der Spiegel. Im April war Stelzers Vorgänger Volker Pietsch, der als Finanzspezialist von der Verbraucherzentrale Berlin gekommen war, zurückgetreten. Die Hintergründe von Pietschs Abgang sind unklar, hängen aber möglicherweise mit der unsoliden Finanzsituation des DIAS zusammen. Seit der Gründung vor fünf Jahren ist der Verein wesentlich von Zuwendungen der Berliner Anlegerschutz-Kanzlei Resch abhängig. Deren geschäftsführender Gesellschafter Jochen Resch ist nicht nur DIAS-Mitglied, sondern auch Vorstand der Verbraucherzentrale Brandenburg – eine
Doppelfunktion, die Resch dem Vorwurf aussetzt, sich über das DIAS Mandanten zu beschaffen. Resch bestreitet das. Das DIAS sei unabhängig konzipiert “und nie eine Mandantenschaufel” gewesen. Auch der neue DIAS-Vorstand Stelzer gilt als Resch-Mann. Man kenne sich “lange Jahre”, so Resch. Eine von Stelzers ersten Amtshandlungen war es, den gesamten zehnköpfigen Beirat, die meisten darin Juristen, abzuberufen.“
(13.6.2009)
Rechtsanwalt Jochen Resch kennt Stelzer „seit vielen Jahren“, wie er selber angibt.
Die Unterwanderung der Stasi hält auch heute noch an:
Der frühere
Innenminister Jörg Schönbohm weist darauf hin, dass Brandenburg eine andere
Überprüfungspraxis der Stasi-Angehörigen hatte als andere Länder, und deswegen
prozentual mehr belastete Bedienstete übernommen hat.34 „Allein in den Reihen der
Polizei sind 2009 noch rund 240 ehemalig hauptamtliche und mehr als 1.200 inoffizielle
Stasi-Mitarbeiter tätig“.35 Bei einer Gesamtstärke der Polizei in Brandenburg von rund
7.000 Mitarbeitern sind das 20 Prozent.

Unser Rechtsstaat lässt es sogar zu, dass Stasi-Angehörige zur Desinformation siegessicher
ein sich offiziös gebendes Buch mit dem Titel „Hauptverwaltung A. Geschichte,
Aufgaben, Einsichten“, herausgeben. Der Historiker Thomas Wegener-Friis, erklärt
dazu: „Die Beiträge belegen, dass die Autoren zur Aufarbeitung der Geschichte nicht
fähig und nicht willens sind und dass sich die geistige Verfassung der alten Stasi-Elite
nicht geändert hat“.
Diese Stasi-Leute leben öffentlich in dem Stolz und brüsten sich, dass es ihnen gelungen
sei, alle westlichen Geheimdienste zu unterwandern und nicht umgekehrt. Ein zweifelhafter
Stolz auf das eigene Können, der sich schnell als ein typisch sozialistischer
entlarvt. Klammert man die ethische Dimension aus, so wird das richtige Maß dieses
Könnens durch einen Vergleich und die Beantwortung der Frage deutlich: Wo können
leichter Autoradios gestohlen werden, auf dem Parkplatz einer Universität oder in der
Tiefgarage der Polizei?
Es stellt sich auch die Frage, warum war der Staatssicherheitsdienst mit seiner uneingeschränkten
Machtfülle und Allzuständigkeit nicht in der Lage, die DDR zu „retten“?
Die Stasi wurde schließlich nicht von Panzern überrollt, sondern vom eigenen Volk
verjagt.

Siegfried Sievert oder Siegfried Siewert – das ist frei nach Hamlett hier die Dioxin-Frage. Ersterer ist der ehemalige Stasi-Agent und Dioxin-Nahrungsketten-Vergifter – letzterer Name das „Pseudonym“ von Klaus-Dieter Maurischat, dem serienmässig vorbestraften „NACHTRICHTENDIENST“-„GoMoPa“-Betrüge und Erpresser.
Im Netzwerk von „ „GoMoPa“ an prominenter Stelle sind RA Jochen Resch sowie der unter mysteriösen Umständen angeblich verstorbene bzw. verschwundene Stasi-Obrist Ehrenfried Stelzer und „Detektiv“ Medard Fuchsgruber.

Das Stasi-Problem war mit dem Zusammenbruch der DDR keineswegs beendet. Ehemalige Stasi-Mitarbeiter gelangten nach der Wende in höchste Positionen. In Brandenburg hatten es sogar mehrere ehemalige Stasi-Mitarbeiter bis in die aktuelle rot-rote Landesregierung geschafft, um dort die Regierung zu übernehmen. Auch in Sachsen-Anhalt könnten nach der Landtagswahl ehemalige Stasi-Mitarbeiter in die Regierung gelangen. Und auch in der Wirtschaft sind viele Stasi-Mitarbeiter in hohe Positionen gelangt. So auch der Herr Sievert. Doch was bezweckte dieser tatsächlich mit der Dioxinvergiftung? Handelte er wirklich aus Profitgier, oder war die bundesweite Vergiftung eine verspätete Rache der Stasi gegen den ehemaligen Klassenfeind?
Ebenso wie andere osteuropäischen Geheimdienste, z.B. der Geheimdienst der Ukraine beim Mordanschlag auf Präsident Viktor Juschtschenko -, benutzte die Stasi Dioxin und Dioxin-Experten:
Die Akte trägt die Registriernummer II 153/71, ist mehrere
Hundert Seiten dick. Auf dem Deckel ein Name: “Pluto“. Unter
diesem Decknamen spionierte Siegfried Sievert (58), der als Geschäftsführer
des Futtermittel-Herstellers Harles und Jentzsch mutmaßlich für
den Dioxin-Skandal verantwortlich ist, 18 Jahre lang für die
Staatssicherheit der DDR. Das berichtet die BILD-Zeitung (Freitagausgabe).

Auf Antrag von BILD gab die zuständige Birthler-Behörde die Unterlagen
jetzt heraus. Die Akten, so BILD, verraten: 1971 wurde die Stasi
auf den damals 18-jährigen Sievert aufmerksam. Sie beobachtete
sein “dekadentes Aussehen“, seine hohe Intelligenz und seine
“guten Verbindungen zu anderen jugendlichen Personenkreisen“.
Sievert wurde angeworben. Aus einem Bericht vom 16. März 1971:
“Der Kandidat kann zur Absicherung der Jugend (…) eingesetzt
werden.“
Sievert wählte laut BILD seinen Decknamen selbst, kassierte fortan
Prämien für seine “inoffizielle Mitarbeit“. In den Unterlagen
finden sich zahlreiche Quittungen, eine vom 6. November 1987:

“Hiermit bescheinige ich den Erhalt von 100 Mark für geleistete
Arbeit.“
Nach dem Abitur studierte Sievert in Greifswald Physik. Er machte
Karriere, spitzelte weiter, berichtete über intime Verhältnisse
seiner Kollegen. So notierte “IM-Pluto“ am 25. September 1986
über zwei Kollegen: “Die beiden beabsichtigen, gemeinsam die
BRD zu besuchen. Fakt ist jedoch, daß zwischen dem Kollegen und
der Kollegin seit langer Zeit Intimbeziehungen bestehen. (…)
Aus dieser Tatsache ist abzuleiten, daß eine gemeinsame Reise
in die BRD mit hoher Wahrscheinlichkeit für eine Flucht benutzt
wird.“

Skrupel zeigte Sievert laut Stasi-Akte keine. Ein Führungsoffizier
notierte: “Der IM hatte keinerlei Vorbehalte bei der Belastung
von Personen aus seinem Umgangskreis.“
1993 stieg Sievert beim Futtermittelhersteller “Harles & Jentzsch“
ein. 2005 wurde er alleiniger Geschäftsführer, steigert in nur
fünf Jahren den Umsatz von 4,3 auf rund 20 Millionen Euro, vervierfachte
den Gewinn.

In der BRD ermitteln Staatsanwälte in 21 Fällen gegen Stasi-Offiziere wegen versuchten Mordes oder Verabredung zum Mord. Heinrich S. ist der einzige West-IM (“Rennfahrer”), der in diesem Zusammenhang verurteilt wird. Viereinhalb Jahre Haft kassiert er für die Beteiligung an den Stasi-Operationen “Fürst” und “Parasit”.

Bei denen gibt Ost-Berlin die Aufträge, Grenzprovokateur Siegfried Sch. und Fluchthelfer Julius L. zu “liquidieren”. Beide Opfer überleben. Siegfried Sch., weil beim Überfall auf ihn (nach Karateschlägen) den Attentätern das Magazin aus der Pistole fällt. Er kann flüchten, gilt danach als verschwunden.

Julius L. kommt davon, weil alle 19 Versuche eines angeheuerten Verbrechers (IM “Karate”) scheitern, eine Bombe an seinem Auto anzubringen. Mal findet er den Wagen nicht, mal gibt es zu viele Zeugen, mal fährt das Auto zu schnell weg. Der Sprengstoff stammt aus Ost-Berlin. Nach dem Verfahren gegen ihn verlässt IM “Karate” den Gerichtssaal als unschuldiger und freier Mann. Die Hauptangeklagten bleiben dem Prozessbeginn gleich fern. Mielke-Stellvertreter Gerhard Neiber hat es am Herzen. Stasi-General Albert Schubert leidet unter Bluthochdruck. Die Atteste sind unterschrieben von Ärzten aus Wandlitz.

Bis heute wird darüber gestritten, wie der Begriff “Liquidierung” im Stasi-Jargon zu verstehen ist. Vor Gerichten behaupten fast alle MfS-Mitarbeiter, es habe in ihrem Sprachgebrauch generell nichts mit “töten” zu tun. Eher mit “unschädlich” machen. Der Führungsoffizier von “Rennfahrer” dagegen räumt ein, dass Siegfried Sch. und Julius L. “beseitigt” werden sollten. So sieht es auch der West-IM, dem Ost-Berlin insgesamt 374 000 Mark zahlt. Er habe die Weisung eindeutig als “Mord-Auftrag” verstanden. Ihn aber nie ausführen wollen. Angeblich will er die Opfer nur erschrecken…
Erich Mielke (geboren im Wedding) ist ab 1957 bis zum Rücktritt zwei Tage vorm Mauerfall Minister für Staatssicherheit (Stasi) in der DDR. Er sitzt zudem im Politbüro, ist Armeegeneral. Der Stasi-Chef ist einer der Hauptverantwortlichen für den Ausbau des flächendeckenden Überwachungssystems. Als er den in viele Abteilungen verzweigten Apparat übernimmt, hat die Behörde 14 000 hauptamtliche Mitarbeiter. 1989 sind es rund 91 000. Sie spionieren, instruieren und verwalten weitere 173 000 inoffizielle Spitzel. Am 13. November 1989 spricht Mielke erstmals vor der DDR-Volkskammer. Er sagt: “Ich liebe – Ich liebe doch alle – alle Menschen – Na, ich liebe doch – Ich setzte mich doch dafür ein.” Und erntet lautes Gelächter. Mielke wird 1993 wegen eines Doppelmordes im Jahr 1931 zu sechs Jahren verurteilt. Zwischenzeitlich brummt er im ehemaligen Stasi-Gefängnis Hohenschönhausen. Wegen der schlechten Haftbedingungen verlegt ihn die Justiz später nach Moabit. 1995 kommt er wegen Erkrankungen auf Bewährung frei. Mielke stirbt am 21. Mai 2000 im Alter von 92 Jahren in einem Altenpflegeheim in Hohenschönhausen. Viele bezeichnen Mielke als “Herr der Angst”.

„Das Ministerium für Staatssicherheit hatte über 100 Spitzel auf die Unterwanderung westdeutscher Menschenrechtsorganisationen angesetzt. Ihre Akten liegen fast vollständig im Archiv der Gauck-Behörde. Die Inoffiziellen Mitarbeiter (IM) wurden noch 1989 aus der DDR in den Westen geschickt.
Sie hatten den Auftrag, etwa die West-Berliner Arbeitsgemeinschaft 13. August und die Gesellschaft für Menschenrechte zu unterwandern. Einige der Stasi-Spitzel stiegen sogar in Führungspositionen auf oder gründeten eigene Ortsgruppen. In den IM-Akten finden sich Schriftwechsel, Hilfeersuchen von DDR-Bürgern und detaillierte Berichte über geplante Betreuungsmaßnahmen. Auf die früher in West-Berlin obligatorischen Vernehmungen durch westliche Geheimdienste waren die Agenten gut vorbereitet. So erzählte ein Spitzel namens “Axel” den Staatsschützern auftragsgemäß, er sei von der Stasi bei Vernehmungen geschlagen worden.
Andere Mielke-Spitzel wurden Mitglieder von Fluchthilfeorganisationen und verrieten ihre Schützlinge an die Stasi. So lieferte einer der Fluchthelfer der “gerichtsbekannten kriminellen Bande Fürch” (Neues Deutschland) fast jeden seiner Schützlinge nicht im Westen, sondern bei der Stasi ab. Auch die Aufnahmelager für DDR-Bürger in Gießen und in West-Berlin wurden mit Hilfe von Stasi-Spähern kontrolliert. Einigen gelang es, enge Kontakte zu konservativen West-Politikern zu knüpfen und sie auszuspähen. Der IM “Karl Diener” verschaffte der Stasi “operativ bedeutsame Informationen” zur Deutschlandpolitik. Quelle laut Stasi-Maßnahmeplan: “ein Repräsentant der Regierungskoalition der BRD”“, schribt der „Spiegel“ 1992.
Ab 1989 beginnt auch SJB Fonds Skyline zu arbeiten. 1989 macht Peter Ehlers sein erstes Praktikum. Was zuvor bei diesen Akteuren geschah bleibt im Dunkeln der Geschichte
Im Schlüsseljahr 1989 sandte die Stasi ihre Mannen in den Westen um dort ihre Unterwanderung weiter zu führen. Wer der Stasi in die Quere kommt wird als feindlich-negative Person eingestuft:
Der Ausdruck feindlich-negative Person bezeichnete im internen Sprachgebrauch des Ministeriums für Staatssicherheit der DDR einen Menschen, der als politischer Gegner des DDR-Systems oder generell des Sozialismus eingestuft war.
Dazu konnte es bereits ausreichen, sich als normaler DDR-Bürger mehrfach kritisch im privaten Kreis geäußert zu haben, und dass dies von einem Spitzel des MfS (Inoffizieller Mitarbeiter) berichtet wurde. Regelmäßig wurden so Personen bezeichnet, die in der Öffentlichkeit wiederholt negativ über das politische System oder seine Repräsentanten gesprochen hatten. Dazu gehörten etwa Dissidenten und kritische Intellektuelle wie Rudolf Bahro und Robert Havemann sowie generell Mitglieder der verschiedenen politischen und kirchlichen Widerstandsgruppen in der DDR.
Entsprechend seinem Selbstverständnis als Schwert und Schild der Partei bekämpfte das MfS solche Gegner – wenn ihre „feindliche“ Einstellung bzw. ihre regimekritischen Aktivitäten eine bestimmte Schwelle überschritten – mit einer Reihe von offenen und verdeckten Maßnahmen. Dazu zählten Inhaftierungen, das Organisieren beruflicher Misserfolge, Rufmord, die Zerstörung von privaten Beziehungen durch organisierte Intrigen, und die psychische Zerstörung der Zielperson, teilweise mit bewusstem Treiben des Opfers in den Suizid. Diese Maßnahmen wurden beim MfS unter dem Sammelbegriff Zersetzung geführt. Deren theoretische Grundlage war die Operative Psychologie, die ein eigenes Studienfach an der ministeriumseigenen Hochschule war.
Genau diese Methoden wendet der „NACHRICHTENDIENST“ „GoMoPa“ auch gegen Kritiker ein.
Deep Throat: „Die „GoMoPa“-Chefs vor allem Stasi-Obrist Ehrenfried Stelzer, der „erste Kriminologe der „DDR“,  haben die Stasi-Methoden mit der Muttermilch eingesaugt. Damit wird im engen Kreis sogar geprahlt und wie leicht es ist, den Westen zu unterwandern.“
Dabei legte die Stasi die Grundlagen mit der sogenannten „Operativen Psychologie“, wie Sie „NACHRICHTENDIENST“ „GoMoPa“ und der Hamburger Ableger heute noch einsetzen:
Die „Operative Psychologie“ war ein Forschungs- und Lehrfach an der Juristischen Hochschule (JHS) des Ministeriums für Staatssicherheit (MfS) der DDR. Diese beschäftigte sich mit „den Erscheinungen, Bedingungen, Gesetzmäßigkeiten und des psychischen Erlebens und der psychischen Steuerung des Verhaltens und der Handlungen der Menschen in der politisch-operativen Arbeit des MfS“. Die auf diese Weise gewonnenen Erkenntnisse wurden zur „Zersetzung“ politischer Gegner des SED-Regimes genutzt.
Anfangs spielte psychologisches Wissen während der Ausbildung an der Juristischen Hochschule keine Rolle. Die erste Schrift zur Operativen Psychologie stammt aus dem Jahr 1960. Erst 1965 richtete das Ministerium für Staatssicherheit ein „Institut für Psychologie“ ein, welches später als Lehrstuhl umgewandelt in die Sektion „Politisch-operative Spezialdisziplin“ eingegliedert wurde. Spätestens mit Inkrafttreten der „Richtlinie 1/76“ gewannen Faktoren zur Beeinflussung der Persönlichkeitsentwicklung von Menschen an Bedeutung. Forschung und Lehre in der „operativen Psychologie“ waren praxisnah und anwendungsorientiert. Die „Operative Psychologie“ förderte hierbei weniger grundlegend neue psychologische Erkenntnisse zu Tage, sondern beschäftigte sich vorrangig analytisch mit dem Einsatz bekannter Methoden. Den Studenten wurden hierbei vor allem Grundkenntnisse der Psychologie vermittelt. So sollten Untersuchungsergebnisse zu Gefühlen, Bedürfnissen und Beziehungen von Menschen, aber auch Erkenntnisse der Gruppenanalyse und zwischenmenschlicher Phänomene wie Vertrauen, Bindungen und Leitung für Zersetzungsmaßnahmen nutzbar gemacht werden. „Operative Psychologie“ war Pflichtfach an der Juristischen Hochschule der Staatssicherheit. Der Anteil am Gesamtanteil am Studium betrug 131 von 2.615 Unterrichtsstunden. Insgesamt haben rund 10.000 MfS-Offiziere an der JHS Kurse in Psychologie gehört.[11] Es bestand die Möglichkeit, mit Studien zur „operativen Psychologie“ einen Doktorgrad zu erwerben.[
Die während der Ausbildung zum MfS-Diplomjuristen vermittelten Wissensbestände dienten unmittelbar als praktisches Mittel zur Feindbekämpfung. Ziel war es, mit psychologischen Mitteln Einfluss auf Personen in der Form zu nehmen, dass „diese erschüttert und allmählich verändert werden beziehungsweise Widersprüche sowie Differenzen zwischen feindlich-negativen Kräften hervorgerufen, ausgenutzt oder verstärkt werden“ um eine „Zersplitterung, Lähmung, Desorganisierung und Isolierung feindlich-negativer Kräfte“ zu bewirken. Der „operativen Psychologie“ kam hierbei die Aufgabe zu, das „Selbstvertrauen und Selbstwertgefühl eines Menschen [zu] untergraben, Angst, Panik, Verwirrung [zu] erzeugen, einen Verlust an Liebe und Geborgenheit [hervorzurufen] sowie Enttäuschung schüren“. Bei politischen Gegnern sollten Lebenskrisen hervorgerufen werden, die diese so stark verunsicherten und psychisch belasteten, dass diesen die Zeit und Energie für staatsfeindliche Aktivitäten genommen wurde. Das MfS als Drahtzieher der Maßnahmen sollte hierbei für die Opfer nicht erkennbar sein. Psychologische Mittel sollten hierbei helfen, „die Psyche des Feindes genauer zu erkennen und zu beeinflussen“, um „Erkenntnisse über Gedanken oder Gefühle, typische Verhaltensweisen und psychische Eigenschaften des Gegners, die wertvolle Hinweise für seine Entlarvung und Liquidierung, Beeinflussung, Zersetzung und Überwachung“ zu erhalten.
Auch während Verhören fanden Methoden der „operativen Psychologie“ zur „Stimulierung der Aussagebereitschaft von Personen in der Untersuchungsarbeit“ Anwendung. Hierbei kamen auch Geräusche und Lichteffekte zur Erzeugung von Schlaflosigkeit, Angstzuständen oder Desorientierungen hinzu. Zudem wurde die „operative Psychologie“ seitens der Führungsoffiziere bei der Zusammenarbeit mit inoffiziellen Mitarbeitern (IM) eingesetzt, um neue Mitarbeiter anzuwerben sowie Vertrauensverhältnisse aufzubauen.
Bei den Opfern von Zersetzungsmaßnahmen auf Grundlage „operativer Psychologie“ lassen sich häufig bis heute Psychosomatische Erkrankungen und posttraumatische Belastungsstörungen feststellen. Der Schriftsteller Jürgen Fuchs sprach deshalb auch von „psychosozialen Verbrechen“ und einem „Angriff auf die Seele des Menschen“, der Psychotherapeut Klaus Behnke bezeichnete diese Methoden als “psychische Folter”.

Weite Bereiche der bundesdeutschen Gesellschaft wurden von der Stasi unterwandert. Ihre “Quellen” in Politik, Militär, Wirtschaft, Medien oder Wissenschaft …
Wie die Financial Times Deutschland berichtet, arbeiten noch immer rund 17.000 ehemalige Mitarbeiter des DDR-Ministeriums für Staatssicherheit im Öffentlichen Dienst der Bundesrepublik. Die Überprüfungen nach der Wende seien zu standardisiert und oberflächlich gewesen, so Klaus Schroeder, Leiter des Forschungsverbunds SED-Staat der Freien Universität Berlin.
Gleichgültigkeit oder Verdrängen? Diese Eindrücke drängen sich auf, wenn man den bisherigen Tatendrang der Berliner Polizei bei der Aufarbeitung möglicher Stasi-Verstrickungen im Westteil sieht. 18 Jahre und acht Monate nach der Wiedervereinigung machtee Innensenator Ehrhart Körting (SPD) die Stasi-Aufarbeitung 2009 zur Chefsache. Im Abgeordnetenhaus erklärte er, dass Polizeipräsident Dieter Glietsch jetzt ein entsprechendes Forschungsvorhaben anschieben wird. Damit soll eine externe Forschungseinrichtung beauftragt werden. Selbst als Ex-Polizist Karl-Heinz Kurras (81) als GM “Otto Bohl” enttarnt wurde, reagierte der Senator nicht sofort mit einem Forschungsauftrag. Seit dem Jahr 2000 gab es nur vier Forschungsanträge zu Stasi-Verstrickungen. Sie wurden von ehemaligen und jungen Polizeibeamten gestellt, die aber nicht im Auftrag des Polizeipräsidenten gehandelt hatten.

Die Historikerkommission zur Untersuchung der Unterwanderung der West-Berliner Polizei durch die Stasi wird voraussichtlich im Sommer ihre Ergebnisse präsentieren. Erst wenn Resultate vorlägen, könne darüber entschieden werden, ob es weitere Untersuchungen oder Überprüfungen geben müsse, sagte Polizeipräsident Dieter Glietsch.
Mit der Untersuchung der Unterwanderung der West-Berliner Polizei wurde der Forschungsverbund SED-Staat an der Freien Universität Berlin beauftragt. Ein Anlass dafür war das Bekanntwerden der Spitzeltätigkeit des West-Berliner Polizisten Karl-Heinz Kurras, der 1967 den Studenten Benno Ohnesorg erschossen hat.
Glietsch sagte, er habe im Juni davon erfahren, dass es bei der Birthler-Behörde ein Aktenkonvolut von 180 Bänden über operative Vorgänge bei der West-Berliner Polizei gebe, die noch nicht systematisch erforscht und ausgewertet worden seien. Dafür sei ein Jahr Zeit notwendig, worauf das Forschungsprojekt auch ausgerichtet sei. Die Kosten trage zum Großteil die Berliner Polizei.
Dem Polizeipräsidenten zufolge ist es möglich, dass die Historiker beim Studium der Akten über die Organisation und den Aufbau der Behörde auch auf Hinweise zu weiteren West-Berliner Polizisten stoßen, die für die DDR-Staatssicherheit tätig gewesen sein könnten. Daraus könne sich die Notwendigkeit zu weiteren Untersuchungen ergeben.
Die Zeit schreibt: „Der Westberliner Polizist Karl-Heinz Kurras, der den Studenten Benno Ohnesorg erschoss, war bei der Stasi. Und er war nicht allein. Unsere Karte (siehe Bild oben) zeigt: Das Ministerium für Staatssicherheit hatte West-Berlin unterwandert.
Gab es West-Berlin wirklich – diese ummauerte, verwunschene Stadt? Vor zwanzig Jahren in die Vergangenheitsform gesunken, ist sie uns heute so fern und fantastisch wie der Mond. Mitunter dringen noch Signale von dorther. Nachrichten aus einer nachkriegsgrauen, agentendurchsetzten Welt. Die Kurras-Nachricht zuletzt.
Der Todesschuss des Karl-Heinz Kurras am 2. Juni 1967 im Hinterhof des Hauses Krumme Straße 66/67 in Charlottenburg traf den Studenten Benno Ohnesorg und löste die massivste deutsche Revolte seit den zwanziger Jahren zwar nicht aus, befeuerte sie aber stark. Nun ist die Wahrheit über Kurras heraus. Der West-Polizist, der da schoss, hörte noch auf einen anderen Namen und auf einen anderen Herrn; Kurras war der IM “Otto Bohl”, ein Mann des Ostberliner Ministeriums für Staatssicherheit (MfS). Seitdem streiten diejenigen, die damals dabei waren, darüber, ob ihre 68er-Mythen umgedichtet werden müssen.
Unser Stasi-Stadtplan möchte dieser Debatte ein realistisches Panorama zuliefern. Er zeigt erstmals ein Gesamtbild der Stasi-Einsatzorte “im Operationsgebiet”. So hieß West-Berlin im Jargon des MfS. Der Stasi-Stadtplan nennt keine Namen. Aber natürlich ist er nur möglich, weil es diese gibt.
Mithilfe von Historikern der Birthler-Behörde wie Georg Herbstritt und Experten wie Jochen Staadt von der Freien Universität Berlin sowie mit Daten aus einschlägigen Publikationen haben wir eine Liste von 90 inoffiziellen Mitarbeitern (IM) des MfS in West-Berlin recherchiert, mit Deck- und meist auch mit Klarnamen, mit Informationen zur Person und zu ihren konkreten Aktivitäten für das MfS. Unser Stadtplan zeigt die Adressen all der Behörden, Parteien, Vereine, in denen diese 90 IM tätig waren.
Wir verzichten darauf, die Klarnamen und die IM-Namen zu nennen, weil es nicht darum geht, die Agenten nun en gros und en détail zwanzig Jahre nach 1989 durch die Stadt zu treiben.
Es geht nur um einen Punkt: Kurras war kein bizarrer Einzelfall. Der Polizist diente in einem regelrechten Agentenheer. Er gehörte zu West-Berlin wie der antikommunistische Schrebergärtner in Frohnau und der zugereiste linke FU-Student in Dahlem. “Ende der achtziger Jahre waren rund 800 bis 1000 Westberliner als IM für die Stasi tätig”, sagt Georg Herbstritt. “Das bedeutet: Rund ein Viertel aller West-IM, die die Stasi in der Bundesrepublik hatte, waren in West-Berlin im Einsatz.”
Wir führen 90 von ihnen auf – das heißt, man muss sich den Stasi-Befall West-Berlins zehnmal so stark denken, wie unser Stadtplan ihn zeigt, um eine realistische Vorstellung des geheimdienstlichen DDR-Einflusses in West-Berlin zu erlangen. So waren nach Eigenrecherchen des Gesamtdeutschen Instituts allein in dieser damaligen Einrichtung rund 20 IM aktiv; auf unserer Liste stehen fünf davon.
Es gab alle Arten von Agenten, in allen Parteien – links, ganz links und natürlich auch rechts. Es gab dumme und schlaue, geldgierige und überzeugte. Manche ließen sich anwerben, andere dienten sich an. Es gab hocheffektive IM wie den beim Senat, der 1981 dem MfS 35.000 Personaldaten lieferte, über den Senatsapparat inklusive aller Mitarbeiter des Westberliner Verfassungsschutzes. Und es gab traurige Figuren wie jenen Sozialarbeiter, den die Stasi als “Perspektiv-IM” in der SPD groß aufbauen wollte und der am Ende vor dem Ärzteverein Hartmannbund herumlungerte und Kfz-Kennzeichen aufschrieb.
Schließlich gab es die umherschweifenden “Objektbeobachter”, oft Rentner aus West- oder Ost-Berlin (nur DDR-Bürger in Rente durften ausreisen). Diese Barfuß-IM waren mit Fotoapparat, Zettel und Stift unterwegs, wohl zu Hunderten, um Personen, Dienstzeiten und -wagen und was sie sonst für berichtenswert hielten, auszuspionieren – vor US-Kasernen, aber auch in Zentren des linksradikalen Kreuzberger Milieus wie dem Mehringhof.
Liest man ihre Notate, ist man geneigt, das Stasi-Treiben für sinnlos, ja für verrückt zu halten. Sorgsam wurden Berichte darüber getippt, dass die männlichen Besucher des Mehringhofs “Jeanshosen” (hier verrät sich der Rentnerjargon des Ostens) und die weiblichen lange Kleider und Röcke trugen.
Dann aber stößt man auf Fälle von ausgesuchter Bösartigkeit. Auf jenen IM etwa, der sich als undogmatischer West-Linker, per Tagesvisa auf Ost-Berlin-Besuch, das Vertrauen einer Arztfamilie erschleichen sollte. Sie erzählte ihm von Fluchtplänen, und er verriet sie und lieferte sie der Stasi aus. Nach vollbrachter Tat zog er sich als IM zurück und war wieder ein normales Mitglied der Sozialistischen Einheitspartei Westberlins (SEW), eines Anhängsels der SED.
Bis in die sechziger Jahre wurden auch Agenten aus der DDR, getarnt als Flüchtlinge, nach West-Berlin geschleust. Nach Auftragserfüllung, oft in Verbänden von DDR-Flüchtlingen, verschwanden sie ebenso klandestin wieder durch die Mauer. Manche wurden dann in Ost-Berlin auf Pressekonferenzen als Kronzeugen für “neonazistische Umtriebe” im Westen präsentiert.
Und noch einen Typus gab es, den unwahrscheinlichsten von allen, der selbst Opfer der Stasi gewesen war und nach Jahren in DDR-Haft seine Verpflichtungserklärung für das MfS unterschrieb. Manche brachen den Kontakt ab, nachdem man sie in den Westen entlassen hatte. Sie hatten offenbar aus der Not heraus unterschrieben. Aber es gab auch die, welche die Stasi-Haft als lebenslang treue Stasi-Spione verließen.
Ein prominenter Fall ist William Borm, jener Grandseigneur der Bundes-FDP und Berliner Landesvorsitzende der sechziger Jahre. Er diente dem MfS seit seiner Haft in Bautzen in den Fünfzigern. Mit moralischer Verve spielte er das strategische Spiel der DDR-Westpolitik. Seinem Parteifreund Hans-Dietrich Genscher warf er in den siebziger Jahren vor, mit seiner Entspannungspolitik letztlich das friedensgefährdende Ziel der Wiedervereinigung zu verfolgen. Wichtige Parlamentsreden Borms, etwa die als Alterspräsident des Deutschen Bundestages – das war er von 1969 bis 1972 –, soll Stasi-Chef Markus Wolf selbst redigiert haben.
Ein anderer prominenter Fall ist Dirk Schneider, der die Deutschlandpolitik der Alternativen Liste (AL) und der Grünen zu beeinflussen suchte. Ganze IM-Corps waren auf CDU und SPD angesetzt: Funktionäre, Unternehmer, Abgeordnete, alles dabei. In den machtrelevanten Bereichen zeigt sich, dass das manchmal lächerlich erscheinende Sammeln von Unmengen von Informationen durch das MfS von politischer Einflussnahme auf das “Operationsgebiet” nicht zu trennen war.
Was unsere Karte nicht zeigt, ist die Planung des MfS für den Tag X der militärischen Eroberung West-Berlins. Nachdem die Panzerspitzen am Sender Freies Berlin zusammengetroffen wären, hätte man begonnen, MfS-Kreisdienststellen in allen Westbezirken zu errichten. Die MfS-Majore und Oberstleutnants an der Spitze sowie das MfS-Personal standen fest und wurden jedes Jahr bestätigt. MfS-Dienststelle Charlottenburg: Major Z. mit 44 Mann. MfS-Dienststelle Kreuzberg: Major L. mit 41 Mann. Und das alles nicht etwa mitten im Kalten Krieg, sondern mitten in den friedensrhetorisch hochaktiven achtziger Jahren.
Ein Gedanke noch zu Kurras. Ist eigentlich jemandem aufgefallen, wie stark das historische Datum des 2. Juni 1967 mit inoffiziellen Mitarbeitern verbunden war? Es war ja nicht nur Kurras’ Schuss. Ein Reporter der Morgenpost, IM auch er, schoss ein damals bekanntes Foto vom Tatort. Und Till Meyer, später ebenfalls IM, gründete die terroristische Bewegung 2. Juni mit. Kurras’ Schuss veränderte Berlin. Und ganz allgemein lässt sich sagen, ohne in wilde Spekulation abzugleiten: Wenn es brannte in West-Berlin, war das MfS schneller da als die Feuerwehr.
Entweder hatte er geblufft, Zahlen verwechselt oder die entscheidenden Beweise sind noch nicht gesichtet worden. Auf jeden Fall sorgte DDR-Spionage-Chef Markus Wolf für reichlich Verwirrung. Er brüstete sich: “Im Bundestag sitzen wir in Fraktionsstärke.” Einmal verhinderte die Stasi auf jeden Fall den Sturz von Kanzler Willy Brandt (SPD). Erich Honecker jubelte …

Der 27. April 1972. Willy Brandt ist wegen seiner Friedens-Politik (Entspannung, Öffnung) heftig umstritten. Abgeordnete der sozial-liberalen Koalition laufen über zu den Fraktionen von CDU und CSU. Rechnerisch hat die Union im Bundestag jetzt eine Mehrheit. Es kommt zum Misstrauensvotum gegen Brandt.

Die CDU will ihren Fraktionsvorsitzenden Rainer Barzel zum Kanzler machen. Es schlägt eine der erfolgreichsten Stunden der Stasi. Ost-Berlin dreht am Rad der Geschichte, besticht die Abgeordneten Julius Steiner (CDU, IM “Theodor”) und Leo Wagner (CSU, IM “Löwe”). Beide kassieren jeweils 50 000 Mark. In Bonn gibt es den Eklat. Bei der geheimen Abstimmung bekommt Barzel nicht die erforderliche Mehrheit. Nur 247 Abgeordnete stimmen für ihn. Zwei weniger als erforderlich. Brandt bleibt Bundeskanzler. Und setzt seine Ost-Politik fort, für die er 1971 den Friedensnobelpreis bekam. Zwei Wochen später ist SED-Generalsekretär Honecker zu Gast beim Staatsbesuch in Rumänien. Er sagt stolz: “Wir haben noch kurz vor Behandlung des Misstrauensvotums bestimmte Maßnahmen getroffen, um die Regierung Brandt zu stützen. Und: “Es ist also die groteske Lage eingetreten, dass wir als die stärksten Helfer für die Stabilisierung von Brandt auftreten mussten.” Dann: “Wir haben das getan, weil diese Regierung selbstverständlich für uns alle angenehmer ist als eine Regierung unter Leitung von Barzel und Franz Josef Strauß.”

1974 tritt Brandt zurück. Die Bundesrepublik wird erschüttert von ihrem größten Spionagefall. Im Kanzleramt enttarnen Nachrichtendienste Top-Agent Günter Guillaume (47). Er ist Brandts persönlicher Referent, viel mit ihm auf Reisen (auch privat), hat Zugang zu Geheimakten, nimmt an Gesprächen im engen Kreis der politischen Macht teil. Guillaume soll Brandt zudem mit Frauen bekannt gemacht haben. Ermittler vermuten, dass Tonbänder von Brandts Liebesnächten in Ost-Berlin gelandet sind: “Der Kanzler ist erpressbar.” Brandt streitet das ab. Seit 1950 steht Hauptmann Guillaume in Diensten der Stasi. Er stammt aus Berlin. Bei der Festnahme sagt er forsch: “Ich bin Bürger der DDR und ihr Offizier. Respektieren Sie das!”

Aufgeflogen ist Guillaume durch 17 Jahre alte Kurzwellen-Funksprüche aus Ost-Berlin, die der BND dechiffriert. Darin gratuliert das MfS seinem Spion zum Geburtstag, sendet Glückwünsche zur Geburt des Sohnes. Wegen Landesverrats verurteilt ihn das Gericht zu 13 Jahren, seine Ehefrau Christel (Sekretärin) zu 8 Jahren Knast. 1981 wird das Spionage-Paar ausgetauscht. Es kehrt nach Ost-Berlin zurück.

Wie viele “IM” im Bundestag sitzen, ist unklar. In den “Rosenholz”-Dateien stehen für die Zeit zwischen 1969 und 1972 die Namen von 43 Abgeordneten. Viele sind ahnungslos. West-IM aus ihrem Umfeld “schöpfen” sie ab. Lediglich drei Abgeordnete sind laut Birthler-Behörde von 1969 bis 1972 “willentlich und wissentlich” Stasi-Informanten. Untersuchungen über andere Legislaturperioden gibt es nicht. Die Große Koalition lehnt 2007 ab, entsprechende Forschungsaufträge zu erteilen. Bekannt ist, dass Gerhard Fläming (SPD, lieferte tausend Dokumente) und Karl Wienand (SPD) Spitzel sind. Zu den drei IM-Abgeordneten gehört William Borm, von 1960 bis 1969 Berliner FDP-Landesvorsitzender. Er sitzt ab 1950 wegen “Kriegs- und Boykotthetze” in DDR-Haft, wird nach seiner Verpflichtungserklärung (IM “Olaf”) entlassen. Borm trifft sich regelmäßig mit Markus Wolf. Bei den Verabredungen fließt Krim-Sekt. Wolfs Leute schreiben Borms Bundestagsreden. In seinem Bonner Büro sitzt als Sekretärin Top-Agentin Johanna O. (“Sonja Lüneburg”). Sogar Borms Sekretär stellt das MfS. 1979 fordert der FDP-Mann die Anerkennung der DDR-Staatsbürgerschaft, er schimpft gegen die Nato, setzt sich für die Friedensbewegung ein. Vor seinem Tod 1987 wird Borm nicht enttarnt, bekommt das Bundesverdienstkreuz, ein Ehrengrab in Zehlendorf.

In West-Berlin backt die Stasi kleinere Brötchen als in Bonn. Bis auf Dirk Schneider (IM “Ludwig”), der von 1983 bis 1985 aus Berlin für die Grünen in den Bundestag rotiert und den späteren Außenminister Joschka Fischer ausschnüffelt, gibt es keine wirklich spektakulären Fälle. Im Abgeordnetenhaus lauschen die SPD-Abgeordneten Ursula L. (IM “Purzel”) und Bodo T. (IM “Hans”) fürs MfS. Bodo T. zerbricht daran. Vorm Prozess 1995 begeht er Selbstmord. Auf die CDU und ihren Regierenden Eberhard Diepgen setzt die Stasi mehr als 80 Agenten an. Einer ist Bauunternehmer und IM “Delphin”, sitzt für die CDU in der BVV Neukölln (Diepgens Wahlkreis). “Delphin” plaudert in Ost-Berlin über taktische Einzelheiten im Wahlkampf, Diepgens Kritik an der Bundesregierung, die Vorstellungen des Regierenden über ein Treffen mit Erich Honecker. Nach der Wende wird das Spionage-Verfahren gegen IM “Delphin” gegen die Zahlung von 12 000 Mark eingestellt.
Die Stasi und ihr Bürokraten-Deutsch. In den Akten finden sich verschiedene Varianten von Inoffiziellen Mitarbeitern (IM). Darunter sind die IMA („Ausländer“, „Arbeitsakte“), IMB („mit Feindberührung“), IME („im besonderen Einsatz“),
IMK („Sicherung der Konspiration“), IMS („beauftragt mit der Sicherung eines gesellschaftlichen Bereichs“), IMV („vertrauliche Beziehungen zur bearbeitenden Person“), FIM („Führungs-IM“) PIM („Perspektiv-IM“), SIM („Sicherungs-IM“). Auch andere Abkürzungen bedürfen der Übersetzung. DB „Durchführungsbestimmung“), LAP („legal abgedeckte Position“), KgU („Kampftruppe gegen Unmenschlichkeit“), KPA („Kontaktperson-Akte“), KW („konspirative Wohnung“), OibE („Offizier im besonderen Einsatz“), Tb („Tonband“), VVS („Vertrauliche Verschlusssache“).
Sogar die Stasi selbst bekommt von MfSMitarbeitern einen eigenen Namen. Bei ihnen heißt sie ganz einfach „Firma“.

SjB-GoMoPa-Opfer: Fakten und Fragen zu Heinz Gerlach & Peter Ehlers

Heinz Friedrich, Sprecher der SJB-GoMoPa-Opfer, analysiert: „Fakt 1: Peter Ehlers war auf Heinz Gerlachs Beerdigung.  Fakt 2: Wenige Monate vor Gerlachs Tod veranstaltete Ehlers mit Gerlach zusammen ein Seminar. Ein Novum. Fakt 3: Peter Ehlers hatte freien Zugang zu Heinz Gerlach.
Fakt 4: Peter Ehlers Vita auf kress.de ist leer und weist keine Biographie auf. Frage1: Kommt er aus dem Osten Deutschlands wie Stasi-Obrist Ehrenfried Stelzer ?  Frage 2Ist Peter Ehlers überhaupt Peter Ehlers ?“

Fakt 5: Mit zwei Artikel entstand das Märchen von der Blutvergiftung von Heinz Gerlach:
Das Stasi-Problem war mit dem Zusammenbruch der DDR
keineswegs beendet. Ehemalige Stasi-Mitarbeiter gelangten nach der
Wende in höchste Positionen. In Brandenburg hatten es sogar mehrere
ehemalige Stasi-Mitarbeiter bis in die aktuelle rot-rote Landesregierung
geschafft, um dort die Regierung zu übernehmen. Auch in Sachsen-
Anhalt könnten nach der Landtagswahl ehemalige Stasi-Mitarbeiter in
die Regierung gelangen. Und auch in der Wirtschaft sind viele Stasi-
Mitarbeiter in hohe Positionen gelangt. So auch der Herr Sievert. Doch
was bezweckte dieser tatsächlich mit der Dioxinvergiftung? Handelte er
wirklich aus Profitgier, oder war die bundesweite Vergiftung eine verspätete
Rache der Stasi gegen den ehemaligen Klassenfeind?

Mit den Methoden der Stasi arbeitet auch der äussert dubiose „Finanz-
NACHRICHTENDIENST“ „GoMoPa“. Bespitzelung, Einschüchterung,
Erpressung, Falschnachrichten, Rufmordmord, Cybermord,
Hacking und wohl auch tatsächlicher Mord gehören zu dem täglichen
Repertoire der serienweise vorbestraften Kriminellen von „GoMoPa“.
Bereits Monate vor seinem Tode war Heinz Gerlach diesem dubiosen
„NACHRICHTENDIENST“ aus Ost-Berlin mit Tarnadresse in New York
und Tarnnamen angeblicher jüdischer Rechtsanwälte auf der Spur. Dabei
setzte er von Anfang an sein Leben aufs Spiel.
Denn er wurde mit Stasi-Methoden ausgespäht, bespitzelt und es
wurden seine Computer gehackt. So hatten die „NACHRICHTENDIENST“-
Aufklärer immer wieder brisantes Material, das sowohl auf der
„GoMoPa“-Webseite erschien (mittlerweile gelöscht) als auch auf der
Gerlach kritisch bis feindlich gesonnenen Webseite Akte-Heinz-Gerlach.
info, deren Verbindungsdaten auffallende Parallen zu dem „GoMoPa”-
Internet-Schattenreich vorweisen.
– Er kannte die kriminelle Vergangenheit der „GoMoPa“-Macher
– Er erkannte die Tarnorganisation in New York
– Er erkannte die mutmassliche Erpressung von Immobilienunternehmen durch die
Konstellation „NACHRICHTENDIENST“ „GoMoPa“ und „Anlegerschutzanwalt“ RA Jochen
Resch.
– Er wusste, dass seine Webseite durch Cyber-Attacken lahm gelegt wurden.
– Er war dabei die Rolle von Ehrenfried Stelzer, dem Top-Stasi-Agenten im Hintergrund
zu entschleiern
– All dies führte wohl zu einem Mordauftrag in klassischer Stasi-Manier mit Dioxin.
– An der Tat massgeblich beteiligt ist mit Sicherheit der vorbestrafte Serienbetrüger und
mutmassliche Stasi-Agent „Siegfried Siewert“ oder auch „Klaus Maurischat“ etc pp.
– Die genauen Tatumstände aufzuklären, ist Sache von BKA, LKA, der Kriminalpolizei
und weiterer Ermittler.
– Aber schon jetzt kann man das Tatszenario erkennen: Auch der Hausarzt von Heinz
Gerlach war wohl misstrauisch, was die Todesursache anbetraf. Er wollte den Totenschein
wohl erst nicht ausstellen mit der Todesursache „natürliche Todesursache.“
– In der Öffentlichkeit indes rollte nach der Todesnachricht das geplante Szenario ab.
Zuerst berichtetet der NACHRICHTENDIENST“ „GoMoPa“ von der Todesursache „Blutvergiftung“
– nur wenige Stunden nach dem Tode von Heinz Gerlach. Woher konnte
der „NACHRICHTENDIENST“ dies wissen ? Darüber gibt es keine Angabe in der numehr
von der Webseite des „NACHRICHTENDIENSTES“ „GoMoPa“ verschwundenen Meldung
vom Tode Heinz Gerlachs.
– Es war auch nicht die Meldung des „NACHRICHTENDIENSTES“ „GoMoPa“, der die
Branche und die Öffentlichkeit von dem angeblich natürlichen Tode Heinz Gerlachs
überzeugte:
Mit zwei Artikel entstand die Legende von der Blutvergiftung von Heinz Gerlach: Derm
heute verschwundenen „GoMoPa“-Artikel, der wenige Stunden nach dem Ableben
„Blutvergiftung“ als Todesursache angab und der zunächst auch von der überaus kritischen
Anti-Gerlach-Webseite Akte-Heinz-Gerlach“ in Zweifel gezogen wurde (Beleg
siehe unten).

Als Heinz Gerlach dann die Zusammenhänge zwischen der mutmasslichen
Erpressung des Berliner Immobilienhauses Estavis und „Go-
MoPa“ bzw Rechtsanwalt Jochen Resch erkannte, wusste er endgültig
zuviel und wurde für die „GoMoPa“-Hintermänner zu einer grossen Gefahr.
Dan wurde offenbar nachgelegt als die Zweifel an der wahren
Todesursache immer lauter wurden:
Zitat:
“14. Juli 2010 – Gerlach und die wahre Todesursache
Der selbst ernannte Anlegerschützer Heinz Gerlach starb an einer
zu spät erkannten Blutvergiftung
Der Mann, der dubiose Finanzsysteme durchschaute, erkannte das
feindliche System im eigenen Körper nicht
Hameln/Oberursel (wbn). Die Szene der Finanzdienstleister und
Anlageberater ist um eine schillernde Figur ärmer. Der Anlegerschützer
Heinz Gerlach ist am vergangenen Samstag in seinem Haus im hessischen
Oberursel gestorben.
In wenigen Wochen wäre er 65 geworden. Gerlach hat mit seiner
Internetseite „Direkter Anlegerschutz“ die Beteiligungsangebote des
Kapitalmarktes bewertet und sich in den 70er Jahren mit dem „Gerlach-
Report“ einen bemerkenswerten Ruf als Brancheninsider erworben. Die
Karriere des Steuergehilfen ist in der Finanzwelt beispiellos. Er hörte
das Gras wachsen – und wieder verwelken. Für die einen war er ein
unbeugsamer Held, für die anderen der Störfaktor schlechthin und erklärtes
ketzerisches Feindbild.
Kein Wunder: Es ging stets um viele Millionen Euro und verdeckte
Interessen. In einem Spiegel-Interview sagte er: „Ich habe hier jeden
Tag ‘Dallas’ oder ‘Denver’“. So kommt es nicht unerwartet, dass sich
jetzt schon Legenden um seinen unerwarteten Tod ranken. Angeblich
habe er sich das Leben genommen, wollen Stimmen aus dem Hintergrund
wissen. Die Wahrheit ist so profan wie traurig: Gerlach, der zu
den Indianern gehörte, die niemals weinen und keinen Schmerz kennen,
starb an den Folgen einer unterschätzten Nagelbettentzündung.
Daraus resultierte eine Blutvergiftung. Dies haben die Weserbergland-
Nachrichten.de aus dem engsten Umfeld des „ältesten Geldanlageschützers“
der Republik erfahren.
Die Sepsis (Blutvergiftung) gilt als der weithin unbekannte und meistunterschätzte
Killer in Deutschland. Diese außer Kontrolle geratene
systemische Entzündungsreaktion auf eine Infektion fordert ebenso
viele Todesopfer wie der Herzinfarkt. Bis zu 50 Prozent der Erkrankten
sterben trotz intensiver Behandlung im Krankenhaus. In Deutschland
erkranken – so die Schätzungen – im Jahr 150.000 Menschen an einer
Sepsis. Gerlach hat komplexe Finanzsysteme durchschaut – den systemisch
angreifenden Feind im eigenen Körper hat er unterschätzt.”
h t t p : / /www.we s e r b e r g l a n d – n a c h r i c h t e n . d e / i n d e x .
php?option=com_content&view=article&id=442:14-juli-2010-gerlachund-
die-wahre-todesursache&catid=1:-weserbergland-nachrichten
Dieser Artikel auf der Webseite der unbedeutenden Provinz-Zeitung
„Weserbergland Nachrichten“, die ein Ex-Stasi-Mann lancierte, beruft
sich auf das „engste Umfeld“ von Heinz Gerlach – ohne auch nur DEN
GERINGSTEN BELEG vorweisen zu können.
Somit wir das Märchen von der angeblichen „Blutvergiftung“ als
Agenda festgelegt.
Einen Tag später, am 15. Juli 2010 übernahm auch die Gerlachkritische
Webseite, deren Veranwortliche weiter im Dunkeln sind, diese
Agenda aufgriff und schrieben:
“Worte über Heinz Gerlach »
15.07.10
Heinz Gerlach: Die Todesursache steht offenbar fest
(Eigener Bericht)
Um Heinz Gerlachs plötzlichen Tod ranken sich diverse Gerüchte.
Die können nun ad acta gelegt werden. Denn die Weserbergland-
Nachrichten haben “aus dem engsten Umfeld” des “selbst ernannten
Anlegerschützers” erfahren, dass Gerlach “an den Folgen einer unterschätzten
Nagelbettentzündung” gestorben ist.
Die norddeutsche Tageszeitung schreibt weiter: “Daraus resultierte
eine Blutvergiftung.” An einer Sepsis sterben demnach jedes Jahr
genauso viele Menschen wie an einem Herzinfarkt.
Heinz Gerlach soll am Dienstag beerdigt werden.
Den Artikel im Original finden Sie hier: http://www.
we s e rbe rgl and-na chr i cht en.de / inde x .php? opt i on=c om_
content&view=article&id=442:14-juli-2010-gerlach-und-die-wahretodesursache&
catid=1:-weserbergland-nachrichten”
Ohne EIGENE RECHERCHE-und ohne den geringsten Beleg übernahmen
diese „INSIDER“ das Blutvergiftungs-Märchen.
Hinzu kommt die Internetseite http://www.akte-heinz-gerlach.
info/15-07-10-heinz-gerlach-die-todesursache-steht-offenbar-fest/ und
die Webseiten die „GoMoPa“ zuzuordnen sind, weisen auffallende Paralleln
auf.
Die Verbindungsdaten der Akte-Heinz-Gerklach.Info, gehostet in
der anatolische Internet-Klitsche Media-on sowie die der „GoMoPa“ und
deren Hintermänner .:
Godaddy ist der Haus-Hoster von ‘Gomopa’ und seit vielen
Jahren der Registrar der ‘Gomopa’-Homepage. Hier werden auch
zahlreiche ‘Gomopa’ zuzuordnende ‘Foren’ und ‘Blogs’ zugeordnet,
in denen fiktive Cyber-Aliasse ihr Unwesen treiben, das natürlich nie
mit Fakten belegt ist wie z.b. extremnews.com.
Registrant: Goldman Morgenstern an Partners LLC
Registered through: GoDaddy.com, Inc. (http://www.godaddy.
com)
Domain Name: GOMOPA.NET
Gehostet hier:
Server IP: 67.23.163.233 Server Location: Lockport, NY, 14094,
United States
Gomopa IP: 67.23.163.230 Gomopa server location: Asheville in
United States Gomopa ISP: Netriplex LLC
Pikant auch die Internetseite der immer wieder mit Gomopa in
Verbindung gebrachten Offshore-Firma Baker & Baker, Köln, wird
bei Godaddy gehostet.
Server IP: 208.109.181.34 Server Location: Scottsdale, AZ,
85260, United States
Von gekaperten Godaddy-IP-Adressen wurden und werden
auch zahlreiche Flooding-Angriffe geführt bzw. sogenannte Stalking-
Seiten gehostet, die so die Opfer eine Spezialität von Klaus
Maurischat seien.
Die Baker & Baker wurde bereits in der Schweiz wegen Vermögenslosigkeit
liquidiert. Siehe http://www.yasni.de/baker+offshore/
person+information und http://www.moneyhouse.ch/en/u/baker_
baker_consulting_group_ag_CH-170.3.014 .447-7.htm
Dieser Firma war Heinz Gerlach ein besonderes Dorn im Auge
Server IP: 95.0.239.251
Domain ID:D28959891-LRMS
Domain Name:AKTE-HEINZ-GERLACH.INFO
Created On:03-Jul-2009 08:59:55 UTC
Last Updated On:10-May-2010 18:16:59 UTC
Expiration Date:03-Jul-2011 08:59:55 UTC
Sponsoring Registrar:Alantron BLTD (R322-
LRMS)
Status:OK
Registrant ID:DI_11637039
Registrant Name:Linh Wang
Registrant Organization:Linh Wang1273487281
Registrant Street1:3617 Tower 1 Lippo Centre
Registrant Street2:
Registrant Street3:
Registrant City:Hong Kong
Registrant State/Province:Queensway
Registrant Postal Code:0000089
Registrant Country:HK
Registrant Phone:+000.5230064510
Registrant Phone Ext.:
Registrant FAX:+000.5230064510
Registrant FAX Ext.:
Registrant Email:// <![CDATA[
var prefix = 'ma' + 'il' + 'to';
var path = 'hr' + 'ef' + '=';
var addy84933 = 'info' + '@';
addy84933 = addy84933 + 'xchiang' + '.' + 'com';
document.write( '‘ );
document.write( addy84933 );
document.write( ” );
//–>\n
// ]]>
info@xchiang.com// Diese E-Mail-Adresse ist gegen Spambots geschützt! Sie müssen JavaScript aktivieren, damit Sie sie sehen können.// <![CDATA[
document.write( '’ );
// ]]>

wie man bei Durchsicht der Seite http://www.akte-heinz-gerlach.info unschwer
erkennen kann. Es geht und ging dabei um die Patenschaft
im grauen Markt der Kapitalanlagen.
Drehsscheibe Mediaon.com Eine wesentliche Rolle bei den illegalen
Offshore-Internet-Aktivitäten der Cyber-Kriminellen spielt
auch die Briefkastenfirma Linh Wang, Honkong, bei der die Seite
http://www.akte-heinz-gerlach.info registriert wurde, die bei dem dubiosen
Undergrund-Unternehmen Mediaon.com in der Türkei gehostet
wird, so die Opfer. Über diese Schiene wurden Dutzende
betrügerischer Erpresser-Sites der Cyber-Kriminellen registriert.
Admin ID:DI_11637039
Admin Name:Linh Wang
Admin Organization:Linh Wang1273487281
Admin Street1:3617 Tower 1 Lippo Centre
Admin Street2:
Admin Street3:
Admin City:Hong Kong
Admin State/Province:Queensway
Admin Postal Code:0000089
Admin Country:HK
Admin Phone:+000.5230064510
Admin Phone Ext.:
Admin FAX:+000.5230064510
Admin FAX Ext.:
Admin Email:// <![CDATA[
var prefix = 'ma' + 'il' + 'to';
var path = 'hr' + 'ef' + '=';
var addy23987 = 'info' + '@';
addy23987 = addy23987 + 'xchiang' + '.' + 'com';
document.write( '‘ );
document.write( addy23987 );
document.write( ” );
//–>\n
// ]]>
info@xchiang.com// Diese E-Mail-Adresse ist gegen Spambots geschützt! Sie müssen JavaScript aktivieren, damit Sie sie sehen können.// <![CDATA[
document.write( '’ );
// ]]>
Billing ID:DI_11637040
Billing Name:Tuce Kuyumcu
Billing Organization:Tuce Kuyumcu1273487281
Billing Street1:Market Street 45a
Billing Street2:
Billing Street3:
Billing City:Baidoa
Billing State/Province:Victoria Mahe Seychelles
Billing Postal Code:00000
Billing Country:HK
Billing Phone:+000.4834433490
Billing Phone Ext.:
Billing FAX:+000.4834433491
Billing FAX Ext.:
Billing Email:// <![CDATA[
var prefix = 'ma' + 'il' + 'to';
var path = 'hr' + 'ef' + '=';
var addy65681 = 'tuce.kuyumcu' + '@';
addy65681 = addy65681 + 'somali' + '.' + 'com';
document.write( '‘ );
document.write( addy65681 );
document.write( ” );
//–>\n
// ]]>
tuce.kuyumcu@somali.com// Diese E-Mail-Adresse ist gegen Spambots geschützt! Sie müssen JavaScript aktivieren, damit Sie sie sehen können.// <![CDATA[
document.write( '’ );
// ]]>
Tech ID:DI_11637040
Tech Name:Tuce Kuyumcu
Tech Organization:Tuce Kuyumcu1273487281
Tech Street1:Market Street 45a
Tech Street2:
Tech Street3:
Tech City:Baidoa
Tech State/Province:Victoria Mahe Seychelles
Tech Postal Code:00000
Tech Country:HK
Tech Phone:+000.4834433490
Tech Phone Ext.:
Tech FAX:+000.4834433491
Tech FAX Ext.:
Tech Email:// <![CDATA[
var prefix = 'ma' + 'il' + 'to';
var path = 'hr' + 'ef' + '=';
var addy1943 = 'tuce.kuyumcu' + '@';
addy1943 = addy1943 + 'somali' + '.' + 'com';
document.write( '‘ );
document.write( addy1943 );
document.write( ” );
//–>\n
// ]]>
tuce.kuyumcu@somali.com// Diese E-Mail-Adresse ist gegen Spambots geschützt! Sie müssen JavaScript aktivieren, damit Sie sie sehen können.// <![CDATA[
document.write( '’ );
// ]]>
Name Server:NS1.ANADOLUDNS.COM
Name Server:NS2.ANADOLUDNS.COM
Hier der Beleg über das Hosting der Anti-Gerlach-
Seite, AKTE-HEINZ-GERLACH.INFO, bei dem
Untergrund-Unternehmen Mediaon.com in der
Türkei gehostet: Linh Wang
Domain ID:D28959891-LRMS
Domain Name:AKTE-HEINZ-GERLACH.INFO
Created On:03-Jul-2009 08:59:55 UTC
Last Updated On:10-May-2010 18:16:59 UTC
Expiration Date:03-Jul-2011 08:59:55 UTC
Sponsoring Registrar:Alantron BLTD (R32
Mediaon Title: Anonymous Hosting – Privacy
Hosting – MediaOn.com is leading the marked in
privacy hosting.
Mediaon Keywords: Anonymous hosting, Whois
Protection, Whois privacy services, Privacy Hosting,
anonymous domain registration, managed
vps
Mediaon Description: MediaOn.com is leading in
anonymous hosting and privacy hosting.
Mediaon IP: 95.0.153.245 Mediaon server location:
Turkey Mediaon ISP: Turk Telekom IP:
95.0.153.245 IP Country: Turkey This IP address
resolves to dsl9539413.ttnet.net.tr
Idari Yonetici / Registrant (Admin) Ad / Name
Tekin Karaboga Adres Catalca Yolu Menekse Mevkii
Istanbul 34537 Tel +90.212.8656520

Diese Internet-Operations-Muster – so die SJB-Opfer – habe
es in Ihrem Falle, aber auch bei zahlreichen anderen Betrugs-, Erpressungs-
und Verleumdungsopfer in den letzten Jahren gegeben.
Nunmehr liegen und auch des heimtückischen Cyber-Mordes an
Heinz Gerlach können ermittelt werden’, so Heinz. F., Mayen, Sprecher
der Opfer (die Personen-Daten wurden aus Sicherheitsgründen
anonimysiert).
Wenn das BKA, LK, FBI und die Kriminalpolizei diesen Spuren
weiter intensiv nachgehen würden, seien die sowieso laufenden Ermittlungen
in zahlreichen Fällen wie auch im Kursmanipulationsfall
‘Wirecard’ von Erfolg gekrönt. Denn große Firmen wie Godaddy und
auch Enom, für die der Reseller Arvixe Domains verkauft, könnten
sich anders als ‘dubiose türkische Untergrund-Internet-Klitschen’ –
dem Zugriff der Justiz nicht entziehen.
„Neue Erkenntnisse in der Affäre Resch/GoMoPa-Stasi haben
wir recherchiert“, erläutert SJB.-GoMoPa-Sprecher Heinz Friedrich.
„Neben dem Stasi-Agenten und früheren Leiter der Kriminologie
an der Ost-Berliner Humboldt-Universität hat Rechtsanwalt Jochen
Resch den sogenannten „Wirtschaftsdetektiv“ Medard Fuchsgruber
(Photo oben) als Protege´ gefördert.
Fuchsgruber spielte eine besonders dubiose Rolle in den letzten
Tagen und Wochen vor dem Tode von Heinz Gerlach. Er sollte im
Auftrag der von „GoMoPa“ erpressten Kasseler Firma Immovation
AG Erkennntnisse über „GoMoPa“ sammeln und diese auch dem
„GoMoPa“-Kritiker Heinz Gerlach zur Verfügung stellen. Er hatte
jederzeit freien Zugang zu Heinz Gerlach und dessen Privaträumen.
8. Juli 2009 … Der Wirtschaftsdetektiv Medard Fuchsgruber
soll zum neuen Geschäftsführer des Deutschen Instituts für Anlegerschutz
(DIAS) gewählt werden“, meldete http://www.anlegerschutz.
tv/
Zwei Tage später starb Heinz Gerlach.
Am 10. Juli 2010 starb Heinz Gerlach angeblich an „Blutvergiftung“.
GoMoPa brachte die Meldung nur wenige Stunden nach dem
Ableben – mit der Todesursache „Blutvergiftung“ – diese Todesursache
kann sehr leicht und sher schnell durch Dioxinvergiftung herbeigeführt
werden. Diese „Pressemeldung“ ist inzwischen von der
Webseite der „GoMoPa“ verwschwunden.
Aber auch andere Insider, ausser uns haben sie gesehen:
Siehe hier in der Akte Heinz Gerlach::

„Zum Tode von Heinz Gerlach »
11.07.10 Sondermeldung
HEINZ GERLACH VERSTORBEN
(Eigener Bericht)
Heinz Gerlach ist tot. Am Sonnabend Abend ist der äußerst umstrittene
“Anlegerschützer” in Oberursel verstorben. Das vermeldet
der Finanzmarketingberater Michael Oehme in einem Rundbrief.
Heinz Gerlach wäre am 9. August 65 Jahre alt geworden.
Auf den Internetseiten der Heinz Gerlach Medien eK ist bislang
keine Bestätigung für diese Nachricht zu erhalten.
Die Todesumstände sind völlig unklar. Der Finanznachrichtendienst
Gomopa spekuliert, Gerlach sei einer Blutvergiftung erlegen.
Bei allen kritikwürdigen Geschäftsmethoden war Heinz Gerlach
ein Mensch, der eine Familie hinterlässt. Unser Mitgefühl gilt seinen
Angehörigen.
Wie und ob unsere Berichterstattung weitergeht, hängt davon
ab, auf welche Weise die Geschäfte des Unternehmens nach Heinz
Gerlachs Tod geführt werden.
Bereits vorbereitete Artikel und Enthüllungen werden wir aus
Pietät zunächst nicht veröffentlichen.“
http://www.akte-heinz-gerlach.info/11-07-10-sondermeldungheinz-
gerlach-verstorben/ (noch ist der Link verfügbar)
Während selbst die Gerlach-kritische Akte schreibt „die Todesursache
ist noch völlig unklar“, WEISS „GoMoPa“ BEREITS ZU
DIESEM ZEITPUNKT; das die ANGEBLICHE TODESURSACHE EINE
BLUTVERGIFTUNG WAR.
Von da an nahm die Legende ihren Lauf – über hessische Weserbergland-
Nachrichten, die keine Quelle angaben.
Wir erinnern uns, das Pseudonym von Klaus Maurischat (dessen
Lebenslauf und Identität wohl gefälscht sein dürften), ist Siegfried
Siewert. Siegfried Sievert ist ein ehemaliger Stasi-Agent und nunmehr
für den DIOXIN-Skandal verantwortlich.
Er gab zu im Auftrag der Stasi, BLUTFETT-VERSUCHE vorgenommen
zu haben.
“Dieser Kerl panschte Gift-Fett in unser Essen”, titelt die Bild-
Zeitung über den Chef des Futtermittelherstellers Harles & Jentzsch

aus Uetersen (Kreis Pinneberg). Gemeint ist Siegfried Sievert, 58
Jahre alt. Wer ist der Mann, der für einen der größten Lebensmittelskandale
Deutschlands verantwortlich sein könnte?
Der Unternehmer lebt in einer Villa in Kiebitzreihe (Kreis Steinburg)
und ist seit 16 Jahren bei Harles & Jentzsch in leitender Position
tätig. Seit 2005 ist er alleinvertretungsberechtigter Geschäftsführer.
Als nach dem Dioxinfund klar wurde, dass die verseuchte
Mischfettsäure nur für technische Zwecke verwendet werden darf,
erklärte Sievert: “Wir waren leichtfertig der irrigen Annahme, dass
die Mischfettsäure, die bei der Herstellung von Biodiesel aus Palm-,
Soja- und Rapsöl anfällt, für die Futtermittelherstellung geeignet
ist.”
Sievert hat sich für Qualitätsstandards stark gemacht
Diese Aussage erstaunt Branchenexperten, die mit Sievert gearbeitet
haben. Christof Buchholz ist Geschäftsführer des Deutschen
Verbands des Großhandels mit Ölen, Fetten und Ölrohstoffen (Grofor),
in dem 120 Unternehmen organisiert sind, darunter auch
Harles & Jentzsch. Buchholz sagt: “Ich kenne Herrn Sievert gut.
Er hat sich seit Jahren für hohe Qualitätsstandards stark gemacht,
insbesondere für das holländische System.” Dabei würden akribisch
all jene Gefahren aufgelistet, die eine mechanische oder chemische
Verunreinigung verursachen könnten – und Standards für die sichere
Produktion von Futtermitteln definiert.
Sievert dürfte demnach ein Experte für eine saubere Futtermittelproduktion
sein. Er besuchte auch die jährlichen Grofor-Treffen,
bei denen sich Experten aus ganz Europa austauschen. Wie
glaubwürdig ist dann seine Aussage, er habe angenommen, die
Mischfettsäure verwenden zu dürfen – zumal der niederländische
Lieferant Petrotec AG in Verträgen, Lieferscheinen und Rechnungen
darauf hingewiesen haben will, dass diese billigere Fettsäure ausschließlich
zur technischen Verwendung bestimmt sei?
“Wir können das nicht nachvollziehen”
Christof Buchholz: “Bei uns war die Überraschung groß. Es ist
ein No-go für Futtermittelhersteller, technische Mischfettsäuren zu
verwenden. Wir können das nicht nachvollziehen.” Er habe deshalb
Siegfried Sievert angerufen. “Wir haben ein kurzes Gespräch geführt.
Herr Sievert war verzweifelt und erklärte auch mir, dass er
dachte, das sei in Ordnung.” Während des Telefonats sei zudem
besprochen worden, woher die Dioxine gekommen sein könnten.
Christof Buchholz: “Herr Sievert wusste darauf keine Antwort und
klagte, dass es so viele Fragezeichen gebe.”
Seine erste Aussage hat er mittlerweile revidiert. Dem niedersächsischen
Agrarministerium teilte Harles & Jentzsch jetzt mit, das

dioxinverseuchte Industriefett sei versehentlich in die Produktion
gelangt. Ministeriumssprecher Gert Hahne: “Die Darstellung, da
hat einer den falschen Hahn aufgedreht, erscheint uns sehr unglaubwürdig.”
Sievert drohen drei Jahre Gefängnis
Die Staatsanwaltschaft Itzehoe ermittelt wegen des Verdachts
einer vorsätzlichen Straftat gegen Siegfried Sievert. Ihm drohen
wegen Verunreinigung von Lebens- und Futtermitteln bis zu drei
Jahren Gefängnis oder eine Geldstrafe. Außerdem droht eine Prozess-
Lawine. Auf was dürfen Landwirte hoffen, die auf Schadensersatz
klagen?
Die Harles & Jentzsch GmbH ist im Mai 1980 in Pinneberg gegründet
worden, zog 1994 nach Uetersen. Im Handelsregister gibt das
Unternehmen als Geschäftszweck an: Handel und Veredelung, Im-
und Export von Ölen, Fetten, Fettsäuren und deren Derivaten. Unter
dem Markennamen “Hajenol” verkauft Harles & Jentzsch Futterfett
für Rinder, Schweine, Geflügel und Legehennen, produziert aber
auch Industriefette für die Papierverarbeitung. Das Stammkapital
der GmbH betrug 1994 genau 537 800 Mark. Diese Summe scheint
zwischenzeitlich nicht erhöht worden zu sein, obwohl der Jahresumsatz
des Zwölf-Mann-Betriebs zuletzt 20 Millionen Euro betrug.
Sollte Harles & Jentzsch vorsätzlich gehandelt haben, wird die
Betriebshaftpflichtversicherung nicht einspringen. Der Bauernverband
geht von einem Millionenschaden aus. Es geht um mehr
als 1000 Landwirte, die ihre Höfe schließen mussten und deren
Tiere teilweise verbrannt werden. Als Entschädigung wird das
Stammkapital und selbst das Gesellschaftsvermögen nicht reichen.
Dem Vertriebschef der Firma zufolge soll am Donnerstag eine Bestandsaufnahme
erfolgen. Danach werde entschieden, ob Insolvenz
angemeldet werde. Gegen Sievert und seine Mitarbeiter hat es derweil
Morddrohungen gegeben. Am Telefon seien Mitarbeiter mit den
Worten “Wir machen euch fertig” bedroht worden, so Sievert.
Bild schreibt: –„ Die Akte trägt die Registriernummer II 153/71,
ist mehrere Hundert Seiten dick. Auf dem Deckel – in feiner Schreibschrift
– ein Name: „Pluto“. Unter diesem Decknamen spionierte
Siegfried Sievert (58) 18 Jahre lang für die Staatssicherheit der
DDR – der Futtermittelpanscher, der mutmaßlich für den deutschen
Dioxin-Skandal verantwortlich ist!
Auf Antrag von BILD gab die zuständige Birthler-Behörde die
Unterlagen jetzt heraus. Die Dokumente zeichnen das Bild eines
Mannes, der rücksichtslos ist, skrupellos und vor allem auf eigenen
Profit bedacht.
Rückblick. 1971 wird die Stasi auf den 18-jährigen Sievert

aufmerksam. Sie beobachtet sein „dekadentes Aussehen“, seine
hohe Intelligenz und seine „guten Verbindungen zu anderen jugendlichen
Personenkreisen“. Sievert wird angeworben. Aus einem
Bericht vom 16. März 1971: „Der Kandidat kann zur Absicherung
der Jugend (…) eingesetzt werden.“
Sievert wählt seinen Decknamen selbst, kassiert fortan Prämien
für seine „inoffizielle Mitarbeit“. In den Unterlagen finden sich zahlreiche
Quittungen, eine vom 6. November 1987: „Hiermit bescheinige
ich den Erhalt von 100 Mark für geleistete Arbeit.“
Nach dem Abitur studiert Sievert in Greifswald Physik. Er macht
Karriere, wird Geschäftsführer für „Absatz und Beschaffung“ in der
„Märkischen Ölmühle“ in Wittenberge (Brandenburg).
Eifrig spitzelt Sievert weiter, berichtet über intime Verhältnisse
seiner Kollegen.
So notiert „IM-Pluto“ am 25. September 1986: „Die beiden
beabsichtigen, gemeinsam die BRD zu besuchen.“ Zwei Kollegen
hätten angegeben, von einem Freund eingeladen worden zu sein.
„Fakt ist jedoch, daß zwischen dem Kollegen und der Kollegin seit
langer Zeit Intimbeziehungen bestehen. (…) Aus dieser Tatsache
ist abzuleiten, daß eine gemeinsame Reise in die BRD mit hoher
Wahrscheinlichkeit für eine Flucht benutzt wird.“
Skrupel zeigte Sievert laut Stasi-Akte keine. Ein Führungsoffizier
notiert: „Der IM hatte keinerlei Vorbehalte bei der Belastung von
Personen aus seinem Umgangskreis.“
Nach dem Mauerfall verlässt Sievert die Ölmühle. Ehemalige
Kollegen wundern sich über seinen Wohlstand, werfen ihm vor, er
habe Lieferungen der Ölmühle unterschlagen, dafür unter der Hand
kassiert. Ein Vorwurf, für den es derzeit keine Belege gibt.
1993 steigt Sievert beim Futtermittelhersteller „Harles & Jentzsch“
ein. 2005 wird er alleiniger Geschäftsführer, steigert in nur
fünf Jahren den Umsatz von 4,3 auf rund 20 Millionen Euro, vervierfacht
den Gewinn. Ein Futtermittelmischer aus Niedersachsen zu
BILD: „Solch ein Wachstum ist mit normalen Methoden unmöglich.“
Mit Panscherei möglicherweise schon: Das dioxinverseuchte
Tierfutter von „Harles & Jentzsch“ war durch das Einmischen von
Industriefetten entstanden. Die sind deutlich billiger als Futterfette.
Allein im November und Dezember 2010 soll Sieverts Firma
mindestens 3000 Tonnen verseuchtes Futterfett verarbeitet haben.

Etwa 150 000 Tonnen belastetes Futter könnten so in die Nahrungskette
gelangt sein.
Martin Hofstetter, Agrarexperte von Greenpeace zu BILD:
„Wenn man sich die Zahlen von ,Harles & Jentzsch‘ anschaut und
die bisherigen Erkenntnisse und Veröffentlichungen berücksichtigt,
kann man eigentlich nur zu einem Schluss kommen: Hier wurde
systematisch betrogen und gepanscht.“
UND: Stasi-Top-Agent Ehrenfried Stelzer war auch Professor für
Kriminologie an der Berliner Humboldt-Universität zu SED-Zeiten.
SJB-GoMoPa-Sprecher Heinz Friedrich kommentiert: „Der Verdacht
liegt nahe, dass hier eine Verschwörung zum Tode von Heinz
Gerlach geführt hat, der dieser Gruppierung im Wege stand. Auch
wir und unsere Angehörigen wurden mit Stas-Methoden bedroht
und eingeschüchtert.“ Und fügt er hinzu: „Wie das Dioxin in die
Blutbahn von Heinz Gerlach kam, werden diese Stas-Agenten und
ihre Mitverschwörer wohl wissen.“
Nach dem Tode von Gerlach wechelte Fuchsgruber endgültig
und offen die Seiten in das „GoMoPa“-Team und sollte auch als
DIAS-Geschäftsführer den Stasi-Agenten Ehrenfried Stelzer ablösen
– auf Betreiben des „Anlegerschutz“-Anwaltes RA Jochen Resch
(siehe unten).
Nachstehende Erklärung publizierte dann Immovation AG:
„Nach den höchsterfreulichen gerichtlichen Erfolgen gegen den
u. a. von rechtskräftig verurteilten Betrügern betriebenen, im Ausland
domizilierten “Informationsdienst” Gomopa geht die Kasseler
IMMOVATION Immobilien Handels AG auch straf- und zivilrechtlich
gegen den Wirtschaftsdetektiv Medard Fuchsgruber vor.
Dieser hatte den IMMOVATION-Vorständen Lars Bergmann und
Matthias Adamietz im Frühjahr 2010 angeboten, unwahre, diffamierende
Veröffentlichungen auf der Website der gomopa.net beseitigen
zu lassen und weitere rechtswidrige Veröffentlichungen dieser
Art zu verhindern. Diese beauftragten Medard Fuchsgruber entsprechend
und entrichteten ein Honorar von insgesamt EUR 67.500,00.
Entgegen allen Zusagen von Fuchsgruber erfolgen über Gomopa
jedoch – insbesondere seit Juli diesen Jahres – weiterhin schwer
diffamierende Veröffentlichungen, gegen deren wesentlichste das
traditionsreiche Kasseler Unternehmen in der Zwischenzeit bereits
vor Gericht eine einstweilige Verfügung durchsetzen konnte (LG
Berlin; Az.: 27 O 658/10).

Fuchsgruber ist – nach Entgegennahme des Vorabhonorars –
offenbar seit Juni selbst “Kooperationspartner” bei Gomopa und
wirbt sogar mit dieser Funktion, auch bei Gomopa wird das Engagement
Fuchsgrubers besonders willkommen geheißen. Nach Auffassung
der IMMOVATION hat Fuchsgruber damit von Beginn an über
sein beabsichtigtes Engagement für die IMMOVATION getäuscht,
was das Unternehmen im Rahmen einer Strafanzeige und eines
Strafantrags inzwischen von der zuständigen Staatsanwaltschaft
überprüfen lässt. Zudem hat die IMMOVATION das vorab bezahlte
Honorar zurückgefordert und wird erforderlichenfalls den zivilrechtlichen
Klageweg beschreiten.
Absurde Erklärungsversuche
Die von Fuchsgruber offenkundig in Journalisten- und Branchenkreisen
zirkulierte Einschätzung, er hätte auftragsgemäß für IMMOVATION
gehandelt, zielt völlig ins Leere: Denn nach seinem Einstieg
bei Gomopa haben die über einen Serverstandort im Ausland
verbreiteten Schmähungen nachweislich sogar zugenommen. Und
schließlich: Selbst wenn dem so wäre, wie ließe sich dann der Umstand
erklären, dass Fuchsgruber weiterhin als “Kooperationsparter”
bei Gomopa fungiert, wenn doch nun für Gomopa öffentlich
bekannt ist, dass Fuchsgruber im Auftrag der diffamierten IMMOVATION
aktiv werden sollte?
Eine unmittelbare Beendigung der Zusammenarbeit Fuchsgruber
und Gomopa wäre daher die logische Konsequenz, die jedoch
bezeichnenderweise bis heute offenkundig ausgeblieben ist, was
den von der IMMOVATION erhobenen Vorwurf weiter untermauert.
Bemerkenswert ist darüber hinaus, dass sich der Einstieg Fuchsgrubers
beim “Informationsdienst” Gomopa laut Medienberichten in
enger zeitlicher Nähe zum Scheitern Fuchsgrubers beim Deutschen
Institut für Anlegerschutz (DIAS) vollzog.“
Und im November 2010 durfte Fuchgruber dann auf der
„GoMoPa“-Webseite für sich werben:
http://www.gomopa.net/Pressemitteilungen.html?id=603&me
ldung=Wucherbeitraege-Medard-Fuchsgruber-gruendete-Aktionsgemeinschaft-
fuer-Versicherte#thumb (Noch ist der Link da)
Hintergrund:
Der Beleg, wie eng „GoMoPa“ und der laut den SJB-GoMoPa-
Opfern hinter „GoMoPa“ stehende Rechtsanwalt Resch stehen,
lesen Sie nachfolgend. Und: RA Resch fördert einen Ex-STASIHauptmann:
Zitat:
„GoMoPa: Warum haben Sie ausgerechnet einen Stasi-Oberst
und zudem noch hochbetagt, nämlich Ehrenfried Stelzer (78), als
Nachfolger von Pietsch bei DIAS eingesetzt?
Resch: “Der Verein stand ohne Geschäftsführer da. Stelzer war
der einzige, der Zeit hatte. Alle im Verein haben gesagt, 20 Jahre
nach der Wende ist die Stasizeit nicht mehr so wichtig. Schließlich
war Stelzer Professor für Kriminalistik an der Humboldt-Uni. Aber im
Nachhinein war das kein so kluger Zug.”
GoMoPa: Stelzer wurde inzwischen von Wirtschaftsdetektiv
Medard Fuchsgruber abgelöst, der nach eigenen Worten die aggressive
Verfolgung von Kapitalmarktverbrechen fortsetzen will. Der
Verein soll künftig von mehreren Rechtsanwälten bezahlt werden.“
Zitatende
Mehr unter http://www.sjb-fonds-opfer.com
Ausgrechnet der dubiose Detektiv Fuchsgruber, der die Seiten
von Immovation AG hin zu „GoMoPa“ wechelt ist also ein Resch-
Protege´.
Und: Fuchsgruber bemühte sich nachweislich um Gerlachs Archiv
in der Insolvenzmasse. Und: er hatte freien Zugang zu Heinz
Gerlachs Privaträumen.
Und: Fuchsgruber wechselte erst OFFIZIELL nach Heinz Gerlachs
für alle überraschenden Tod zu „GoMoPa“ und wurde ein
Protege´von Resch.
Und: Das Pseudonym von Klaus Maurischat „Siegfried Siewert“
ist ein Anagramm des Namen des früheren Stasi-Agenten und Dioxin
Panschers Siegfried Sievers.
Und: Die Stasi führte Menschenversuche mit Dioxin durch.
Alles Zufälle ? Rein statistisch gesehen wohl kaum.
Dazu passt, dass diese Gruppierung die Publikation dieser Fakten
mit allen Umständen verhindern will. Sie werden wissen weshalb…
Beispiel GMAC:
Laut den SJB-GoMoPa-Opfern versuchte GoMoPa wohl im
Auftrag von Resch die General Motors-Tochter GMAC zu erpressen.
Zitata aus „GoMoPa“: Der Berliner Anlegerschutzanwalt Jochen
Resch, der zahlreiche Käufer von GMAC-RFC-finanzierten Wohnungen
vertritt, sagte dem Finanznachrichtendienst GoMoPa.net: “Anfangs
wurde das Fünffache, später sogar das Siebenfache des Nettoverdienstes
eines Kreditnehmers als Kredit vergeben. Wer also
40.000 Euro netto im Jahr verdiente, bekam einen Kredit bis zu
280.000 Euro, obwohl, wie sich nach Überprüfung herausstellt, die
Immobilie nur 140.000 Euro wert war.
Dazu genügte eine Anmeldung beim Internet-Vermittler Creditweb,
und die Kredite wurden bei entsprechender Verdienstbescheinigung
im Eiltempo durchgewunken.
Was die Wohnung wirklich wert war, war nicht mehr das Problem
von GMAC-RFC . Denn sie verschnürte die Wohnungen zu Paketen
von 500 Millionen Euro und verkaufte die Pakete zur Refinanzierung
nach Holland.
Nutzniesser der Baufilligenz der GMAC-RFC waren aber nicht
die Käufer, die mit dem Kredit über dreißig Jahre eine überteuerte
Wohnung abzahlen. Nutzniesser waren die Verkäufer und Vermittler,
die 50 Prozent auf den wahren Verkehrswert der Wohnung
draufgeschlagen hatten.
Für die Vermittler von Wohnungsfinanzierungen begann ein
wahres Schlaraffenland
Anlegerschutzanwalt Resch beschreibt den Aufstieg der Ami-
Bank so: “Vertriebsorganisationen sahen die große Chance, ihren
bei anderen Banken nur schwer finanzierbaren Kunden einen Kredit
zu vermitteln. Für den Vertrieb der entscheidende Vorteil. Nur wenn
Geld fließt, fließen auch die Provisionen. Bis zu 35 Prozent des Kaufpreises.
Dieses attraktive Angebot ließ die GMAC-RFC Bank innerhalb
kurzer Zeit zu einem ernsthaften Konkurrenten für die übrigen fi-
nanzierenden Banken auf dem Schrottimmobilienmarkt aufsteigen.
Innerhalb kurzer Zeit erreichte die GMAC-RFC Bank deshalb ein
Gesamtkreditvolumen von mehr als zwei Milliarden Euro.
Der Grund für die großzügige Kreditgewährung dürfte gewesen
sein, dass die GMAC-RFC Bank das Risiko verkaufte. Sie wollte von
vornherein die Kredite nicht behalten. Sie schnürte große Kreditpakete
und verkaufte diese an holländische Zweckgesellschaften.
Die GMAC-RFC wurde schnell zum heißen Tipp auf dem Immobilienmarkt.
Denn Verkäufer und Vermittler bekamen sogar Antrag-
steller ohne Eigenkapital durch, die bei jeder anderen Bank durchgefallen
wären.”
Die GMAC-RFC Bank feierte sich in einer Pressemitteilung vom
Januar 2007 wie folgt: „Mit Einführung der neuen Baufilligenz® –
einer Produktinnovation, mit der erstmals in Deutschland standardisierte
Vollfinanzierungen für Eigennutzer und Kapitalanleger bis zu
110 Prozent des Kaufpreises angeboten werden – haben wir nicht
nur innerhalb kurzer Zeit die Produktführerschaft erreicht, sie zeichnet
auch als Wachstumstreiber für die Verdoppelung des Neugeschäftes
gegenüber 2005 verantwortlich.“
Im September 2008 war das Innovations-Konzept der GMAC
sowohl in den USA als auch in Deutschland gescheitert. Die GMACRFC
vergibt seitdem keine Hypothekendarlehen mehr.
Anlegerschutzanwalt Resch: “Zum 30. September 2008 gab die
GMAC-RFC Bank ihre Lizenz zurück. Es wurde den Kunden mitgeteilt,
dass alles beim Alten bleibe. Die GMAC-RFC Servicing GmbH
werde jetzt die Kunden weiter betreuen.
Schon damals entstanden jedoch Zweifel, ob dieses Angebot
ernst gemeint war. Wir hatten befürchtet, dass sich die Konditionen
bei der Prolongation des Darlehens verschlechtern würden.”
Die Befürchtungen bestätigt die GMAC-RFC indirekt in ihrem
Rundbrief vom 23. September 2010. Der Vorteil einer Umschuldung
auf eine andere Bank sei die Möglichkeit einer „besseren Zinskondition“.
Theoretisch dürfte die GMAC-RFC damit recht haben. Praktisch
wird es allerdings dazu führen, dass die GMAC-RFC Darlehensnehmer
bei dem Versuch einer Umschuldung bemerken werden, dass sie
wohl keine einzige Bank finden werden, die in das Risiko einsteigt.
Es wird offenbar werden, dass viele Anleger nur durch das institutionelle
Zusammenwirken zwischen Vertrieb, Verkäufer und
GMAC-RFC Bank einen Kredit bekommen hatten.
Es wird offenbar werden, dass die Hausbank des Kunden die
Umschuldung nur bei Stellung weiterer Sicherheiten vornehmen
wird.
Es wird offenbar werden, dass vielfach die Wohnung sittenwidrig
überteuert ist. Sie bringt beim Weiterverkauf nicht einmal die
Hälfte dessen, was die GMAC-RFC Bank finanziert hat.
Das einzig Gute ist, dass viele ahnungslose Anleger beim Versuch
einer Umschuldung bemerken, was ihnen seinerzeit angetan
wurde.”
GoMoPa.net schickte der GMAC-RFC Servicing GmbH folgende
Fragen:
1) Ist es richtig, dass dieses Angebot zur Umschuldung damit
zusammenhängt, dass die zur Refinanzierung an holländische
Zweckgesellschaften verkauften Kredite nur unzureichend bedient
werden und durch die Umschuldung die Rückzahlung und die
Zinszahlungen für die Anleihen der Zweckgesellschaften gesichert
werden müssen?
2) Ist es richtig, dass die GMAC-RFC Bank seit ihrem Auftreten
auf dem deutschen Immobilienmarkt im Jahr 2004 ein Gesamtvolumen
von über zwei Milliarden Euro an Krediten ausgereicht hat,
die in fünf „Paketen“ an holländische Zweckgesellschaften verkauft
wurden?
3) Ist es richtig, dass ausschließlich über das Internetportal
Creditweb Darlehensanträge bei der GMAC eingereicht werden
konnten? Wenn nein, welche weiteren Internetportale waren dazu
berechtigt?
4.) Ist es richtig, dass die mit der Creditweb kooperierenden
Vertriebe keine Originalunterlagen der Kreditsuchenden, sondern
lediglich Kopien eingereicht haben? Hat sich die GMAC-RFC Bank
seinerzeit Originale der Lohn- und Gehaltsunterlagen der Kreditnehmer
vorlegen lassen?
5.) Ist es richtig, dass in dem Baufilligenzprogramm es lediglich
auf die finanzielle Situation des Darlehensnehmers ankam und dass
Kredite bis zur Höhe des siebenfachen Jahresnettoeinkommens fi-
nanziert wurden?
6.) Ist es richtig, dass die Gewährung der Kredite auf der Grundlage
des Pfandbriefgesetzes erfolgte?
7.) Wie erfolgt der Nachweis der Aktivlegitimation der GMAC
Servicing GmbH in Fällen, in denen die Vollstreckung bei notleidenden
oder gekündigten Darlehen erforderlich wird?
GoMoPa.net ersuchte die GMAC-RFC Servicing GmbH in Wiesbaden
mehrmals, zu dem Rundbrief an die deutschen Kreditnehmer
Stellung zu beziehen. Die Geschäftsführerin Jennifer Anderson sei
in den USA, eine Telefonnummer sei nicht bekannt. Die Pressesprecherin
Katharina Dahms sei in Urlaub und hätte keine Vertretung.
Und der Prokurist Sven Klärner, der noch Auskunft geben könnte,
rief trotz mehrfacher Bitten von GoMoPa.net nicht zurück – er wird
wissen warum. „
Hintergrund:
Die SJB-GoMoPa-Opfer behaupten: „Der abgetauchte Berliner
Zweig der GoMoPa-Gangster will nun zusammen mit ihrem Hausanwalt
RA Jochen Resch, Berlin, die DKB erpressen – so wie sie dies
vorher mit Immovation versucht haben.
Estavis hat bezahlt, damit ein Grundsatzurteil gegen sie nicht
unter den Käufern ihrer Immobilien verbreitet wird. Dasselbe Spiel
versuchen der Knacki Maurischat und sein Kumpan Resch nun auch
bei der DKB durchzuziehen.
Eigengartig, da schliesst ein Finanzforum aus Deutschland mit
Briefkasten in New York einen Vertrag ab mit einem börsenkotierten
Immobilien-Unternehmen aus Berlin, der Estavis AG. Dieser
Vertrag umfasst Dienstleistungen im Marketingbereich für den Abverkauf
Denkmalgeschützter Eigentumswohnungen. Kontraktwert:
€ 100’000 ! Eine sehr eigenartig Vereinbarung.“
Börse Online: „Der Anlegeranwalt Jochen Resch kommt neuerdings
oft in den Pressemitteilungen vor, die der Finanzdienst Gomopa
ungefragt an Redaktionen verschickt. Als „Deutschlands bekannteste
Anlegerschutzkanzlei“ wird Resch Rechtsanwälte in einem
Bericht über das Ende der Noa Bankvorgestellt. Zu Schrottimmobilien
äußert sich Resch, zu einem Skandal um den Immobilienfondsanbieter
Volkssolidarität. Die Offenheit ist neu. Früher ging
Gomopa Resch hart an und konfrontierte ihn mit Vorwürfen. Doch
einige Formulierungen in einer Teilhaberinformation zur finanziellen
Situation Gomopas vom Juli 2010 legen nahe, dass der Sinneswandel
vielleicht nicht nur Zufall ist.
Gomopa, eigentlich Goldman Morgenstern & Partners Consulting
LLC mit Sitz in New York, ist seit mehr als zehn Jahren aktiv. Auf
der Website ist unter den Fachautoren der bekannte Bestsellerautor
Jürgen Roth aufgelistet. Im Handelsregister der deutschen Zweigniederlassung
ist als Geschäftszweck an erster Stelle „wirtschaftliche
Beratung, insbesondere des Mittelstandes“ aufgelistet. Dazu gehöre
„die Präsentation von Firmen im Internet und anderen Medien“. Die
Verbindung des Dienstes mit einem Nachrichtenportal im Internet
sieht Gomopa-Gründer Mark Vornkahl nicht als Problem: „Ein Interessenkonflikt
zwischen kostenpflichtiger Beratung, Informationsabonnement
und öffentlicher Aufklärung ist uns seit Bestehen nicht
untergekommen.“
Doch die Nutzer des Portals erfuhren bislang nicht, ob mit Personen
oder Organisationen, über die berichtet wurde, vertragliche
Beziehungen bestehen. Reschs Kanzlei war laut Teilhaberinformation
zeitweise eine wichtige Finanzierungsquelle von Gomopa. Darin
berichtet Gomopa-Mitgründer Klaus Maurischat, dass eine Vereinbarung
mit der Kanzlei „momentan 7500,- Euro im Monat einbringt
– rund 25 Prozent unserer monatlichen Kosten!“. Für „individuelle
Mandantenanwerbung“ stehe die Gesellschaft mit mehreren Anwaltskanzleien
in Verhandlungen.
Anwalt Resch stellt zum Inhalt der Vereinbarung klar: „Wir haben
einen einmaligen Rechercheauftrag erteilt, der im üblichen
Rahmen honoriert wird.“ Mit Mandantenbeschaffung habe das nichts
zu tun. Was Gomopa von einer Mandantenanwerbung hätte, ist
auch unklar. Denn Anwälte dürfen dafür nicht bezahlen. Auf unsere
Anfrage zu dieser und weiteren Fragen gab Vornkahl keine inhaltliche
Antwort beziehungsweise verwahrte sich gegen Zitate aus den
entsprechenden Passagen seiner E-Mail, weil er einem Mitbewerber
„keine Auskünfte zur Ausgestaltung unseres Geschäftsbetriebes
gebe.“
Ein Insider: „Was glauben Sie, wer auf die Idee kam, die
ominöse Briefkasten-Firma Goldman, Morgenstern & Partner LLC,
„GoMoPa“, einen angeblichen Zusammenschluss jüdischer Anwälte
in den USA zu gründen und wer die vielen Anwälte wie RA Albrecht
Saß, Hamburg, OLG Richter a.D. Matthias Schillo, Potsdam, und RA
Thomas Schulte, Berlin, zur Reputationsaufbesserung aufbot ?
a) RA Jochen Resch oder b) Ex-Gefängnisinsasse Klaus
Maurischat, der kaum Englisch spricht ? Und: Heinz Gerlach war
dicht dran, diese Zusammenhänge aufzuklären über den „Estavis“-
“Beratungsvertrag“. Seine Tochter, eine Rechtsanwältin in New York,
hatte bereits eine eidesstattliche Versicherung über die Brifekasetn
Firma „Goldman, Morgenstern & Partner LLC“ und deren Briefkastenadresse
in New York abgegeben und er hatte Strafanzeige wegen
der „Estavis“Beratungs-Affäre“ abgegeben. Dann wechselt auf einmal
der von Immovation zur Aufklärung von „GoMoPa“ beauftragte
„Detektiv“ Meinhard Fuchs trotz eines bereits bezahlten Honorares
von über € 60.000,- die Seiten hin zu „GoMoPa“ und Heinz Gerlach
stirbt plötzlich und für alle unerwartet angeblich an Blutvergiftung,
seltsam…“

Opfer: „Nach Immovation und Estavis versucht GoMoPa nun DKB zu erpressen- GoMoPa-Hintermann RA Resch

Die SJB-GoMoPa-Opfer behaupten: „Der abgetauchte Berliner Zweig der GoMoPa-Gangster will nun zusammen mit ihrem Hausanwalt RA Jochen Resch, Berlin,  die DKB erpressen – so wie sie dies vorher mit Immovation versucht haben.
Estavis hat bezahlt, damit ein Grundsatzurteil gegen sie nicht unter den Käufer ihrer Immobilien verbreitet wird. Dasselbe Spiel versuchen der Knacki Maurischat und sein Kumpan Resch nun auch bei der DKB durchzuziehen.
Eigengartig, da schliesst ein Finanzforum aus Deutschland mit Briefkasten in New York einen Vertrag ab mit einem börsenkotierten Immobilien-Unternehmen aus Berlin, derESTAVIS AG. Dieser Vertrag umfasst Dienstleistungen im Marketingbereich für den Abverkauf Denkmalgeschützter Eigentumswohnungen. Kontraktwert: € 100’000 ! Eine sehr eigenartige Vereinbarung.“
Börse Online: „Der Anlegeranwalt Jochen Resch kommt neuerdings oft in den Pressemitteilungen vor, die der Finanzdienst Gomopa ungefragt an Redaktionen verschickt. Als „Deutschlands bekannteste Anlegerschutzkanzlei“ wird Resch Rechtsanwälte in einem Bericht über das Ende der Noa Bankvorgestellt. Zu Schrottimmobilien äußert sich Resch, zu einem Skandal um den Immobilienfondsanbieter Volkssolidarität. Die Offenheit ist neu. Früher ging Gomopa Resch hart an und konfrontierte ihn mit Vorwürfen. Doch einige Formulierungen in einer Teilhaberinformation zur finanziellen Situation Gomopas vom Juli 2010 legen nahe, dass der Sinneswandel vielleicht nicht nur Zufall ist.
Gomopa, eigentlich Goldman Morgenstern & Partners Consulting LLC mit Sitz in New York, ist seit mehr als zehn Jahren aktiv. Auf der Website ist unter den Fachautoren der bekannte Bestsellerautor Jürgen Roth aufgelistet. Im Handelsregister der deutschen Zweigniederlassung ist als Geschäftszweck an erster Stelle „wirtschaftliche Beratung, insbesondere des Mittelstandes“ aufgelistet. Dazu gehöre „die Präsentation von Firmen im Internet und anderen Medien“. Die Verbindung des Dienstes mit einem Nachrichtenportal im Internet sieht Gomopa-Gründer Mark Vornkahl nicht als Problem: „Ein Interessenkonflikt zwischen kostenpflichtiger Beratung, Informationsabonnement und öffentlicher Aufklärung ist uns seit Bestehen nicht untergekommen.“
Doch die Nutzer des Portals erfuhren bislang nicht, ob mit Personen oder Organisationen, über die berichtet wurde, vertragliche Beziehungen bestehen. Reschs Kanzlei war laut Teilhaberinformation zeitweise eine wichtige Finanzierungsquelle von Gomopa. Darin berichtet Gomopa-Mitgründer Klaus Maurischat, dass eine Vereinbarung mit der Kanzlei „momentan 7500,- Euro im Monat einbringt – rund 25 Prozent unserer monatlichen Kosten!“. Für „individuelle Mandantenanwerbung“ stehe die Gesellschaft mit mehreren Anwaltskanzleien in Verhandlungen.
Anwalt Resch stellt zum Inhalt der Vereinbarung klar: „Wir haben einen einmaligen Rechercheauftrag erteilt, der im üblichen Rahmen honoriert wird.“ Mit Mandantenbeschaffung habe das nichts zu tun. Was Gomopa von einer Mandantenanwerbung hätte, ist auch unklar. Denn Anwälte dürfen dafür nicht bezahlen. Auf unsere Anfrage zu dieser und weiteren Fragen gab Vornkahl keine inhaltliche Antwort beziehungsweise verwahrte sich gegen Zitate aus den entsprechenden Passagen seiner E-Mail, weil er einem Mitbewerber „keine Auskünfte zur Ausgestaltung unseres Geschäftsbetriebes gebe.“
Hier eine vorläufige Liste der von RA Resch bearbeiteten Fälle:
Liste der bearbeiteten Fälle:
ALLWO (Badenia Heinen & Biege)
B & V
BADENIA (Allwo, Heinen&Biege)
BAG, Hamm
BBI Beteiligungsgesellschaft Bayrische Immobilien
Beißer Gruppe
BEMA / OSPA
Betreutes Wohnen
BHW Bank, Hameln
Brentana Wohnbau
C & C CyberCooperation AG
dieser Eintrag wurde gelöscht
CFG Grundbesitz GmbH
Contest (heute CFG Grundbesitz GmbH)
Conzeptbau Bagge
DBVI Privatbank Reithinger
Dedimax (S&C Grund & Kapital)
DEGEWO
Deutscher Informationsdienst, Hannover
DM Beteiligungen AG
Dubai Invest Immobilienfonds GmbH & Co. KG / First Real Estate
Eagle Immobilien
EECH Gruppe
EURO Convent AG
EURO-Gruppe
Falk-Fonds
Finanz Concept GmbH
First Real Estate Grundbesitz GmbH
Fondax Beteiligungsfonds 1
Fondax Beteiligungsfonds 2
Fondax Capital – Select GmbH & Co.KG
Fortissimo
Forum IV GbR
Frankonia Sachwert AG (jetzt Deltoton)
FUNDUS – Gruppe
GABAU GmbH & Co.KG
Gallinat Bank, Essen
Global Real Estate
Göttinger Gruppe
Grüezi GmbH, Berlin
Grund & Boden
Hansa Grundinvest OHG
Hauser Wohnbau GmbH
HCC Fonds
Heberle & Kollegen, Rostock
Horst Bogatz
IBH – Immobilienfonds
ISP Internationaler Sachwert Plan
KK Royal Basement
Köllner
Madrixx AG, Berlin
Morena GmbH, Berlin
Papenburg Carré
Plan-Immofonds
Prime Estate GmbH, Berlin
Private Commercial Office – US Land Banking
Prokon
PS Haus – & Grundbesitzmarketing GmbH, Berlin
Quadro – Bau GmbH & Co. KG
R & R First Concept, Berlin
RB Real Estate
RCM Royal Capital Management, Berlin
Rentadomo
RJS Grundstück-u. Immobiliengesellschaft mbH
Rolf Albern Vermögensverwaltungs GmbH
S & C/ PK Multifonds
Securenta / Göttinger Gruppe / Langenbahn AG
Südwestrentaplus
Treuconcept
TREUCONSULT
UVBD
VEAG Immobilienfonds Nr. 298 KG
VermögensGarant AG
W K West Finanz Kapital Beteiligungs AG
WBG Leipzig-West
WHe Kommunalfonds Fürstenwalde KG
WI – RN GmbH
Wirtschaftskontor Berlin Kusch & Co. GmbH
WKVI, Düsseldorf
Wollenberg & Branke GmbH & Co KG

Ein Insider: „Was glauben Sie, wer auf die Idee kam,  die ominöse Briefkastenfirm Goldman, Morgenstern & Partner LLC, „GoMoPa“, einen angeblichen Zusammenschluss jüdischer Anwälte in den USA zu gründen und wer die vielen Anwälte wie RA Albrecht Saß, Hamburg, OLG Richter a.D. Matthias Schillo, Potsdam,  und RA Thomas Schulte, Berlin,  zur Reputationsaufbesserung aufbot ?
a)    RA Jochen Resch oder b) Ex-Gefängnisinsasse Klaus Maurischat, der kaum Englisch spricht ? Und: Heinz Gerlach war dicht dran, diese Zusammenhänge aufzuklären über den „Estavis“-“Beratungsvertrag“. Seine Tochter, eine Rechtsanwältin in New York, hatte bereits eine eidesstattliche Versicherung über die Brifekasetn Firma „Goldman, Morgenstern & Partner LLC“ und deren Briefkastenadresse in New York abgegeben und er hatte Strafanzeige wegen der „Estavis“Beratungs-Affäre“ abgegeben. Dann wechselt auf einmal der von Immovation zur Aufklärung von „GoMoPa“ beauftrage „Detektiv“ Meinhard Fuchs trotz eines bereits bezahlten Honorares von über € 60.000,- die Seiten hin zu „GoMoPa“ und Heinz Gerlach stirbt plötzlich und für alle unerwartet angeblich an Blutvergiftung, seltsam…“

Deep Throat: „Wie die CYBER-STASI anständige Bürger und Unternehmen per Rufmord in den gesundheitlichen und geschäftlichen RUIN treibt“

Deep Throat, Berlin, berichtet: „Das Mastermind hinter allen „GoMoPa“-Aktionen ist der „Anlegerschutzanwalt“ Jochen Resch. Resch hat auch Meridian Capital erpresst, schickt aber immer die Handlanger wie Klaus-Dieter Maurischat vor. Nur vorbestrafte Serienbetrüger wie Maurischat lassen sich zu solchen Straftaten instrumentalisieren. Er hat auch den Terminus „Cyberstalker“ aus den USA importiert. Maurischat kann das aufgrund mangelnder Bildung sogar nicht einmal korrekt schreiben.“
Wie Cyberstalking funktioniert:
Ein aufsehenerregender Fall belegt, dass Rufmörder keineswegs harmlos sind, sondern Schwerverbrecher, die gar den Tod ihres Opfers billigend in Kauf nehmen. In Südkorea wurde ein Filmstar durch Online-Mobbing in den Freitod getrieben. Die Regierung fordert nun härtere Gesetze zur Internetregulierung. Südkorea will Cybermobbern mit harten Gesetzen beikommen, wie eine brandaktuelle Meldung von pressetext.de berichtet:

Der Selbstmord der populären Schauspielerin Choi Jin Sil entwickelt sich in Südkorea zu einer nationalen Affäre mit weitreichenden Konsequenzen. Diese betreffen vor allem das Internet, das von den südkoreanischen Behörden als Ursache des tragischen Ereignisses genannt wird. Wie die Zeitung International Herald Tribune berichtet, habe die Polizei mittlerweile nachweisen können, dass die Verzweiflungstat des Filmstars eine direkte Reaktion auf im Web verbreitete rufschädigende Gerüchte gewesen sei. Kurz nach dem Bekanntwerden des näheren Tathintergrunds brach im Parlament Südkoreas ein heftiger Streit über die bestehenden Internetregulierungsmaßnahmen aus. Während die Regierung den aktuellen Todesfall zum Anlass nimmt, um eine verschärfte Kontrolle des Internets zu fordern, lehnt die Opposition dies mit der Begründung ab, dass die bestehenden Gesetze gegen sogenanntes “Cybermobbing” völlig ausreichend seien.
“Das Internet hat sich in unserem Land zu einer Toilettenwand entwickelt”, erklärt Hong Joon Pyo, Vertreter der südkoreanischen Regierungspartei Grand National Party, gegenüber dem International Herald Tribune. Verbale Übergriffe im Web seien in Südkorea sehr verbreitet. “Wir haben es hier mit einem wachsenden sozialen Problem zu tun, dessen Lösung inzwischen ein Hauptanliegen der Regierung geworden ist”, ergänzt Pyo. Bereits seit mehreren Monaten beschäftige die Regierung ein Team aus 900 Agenten des nationalen Cyber Terror Response Centers, das sich speziell mit dem Auffinden von rufschädigenden Inhalten und Cybermobbing-Attacken im Web befasse. Im Fokus der Fahnder stehen dabei vor allem Online-Foren und Blogs. “Wir brauchen aber ein härteres eigenständiges Gesetz im Kampf gegen Online-Verleumdung, das den Opfern schneller und breiter hilft”, fordert der Regierungsvertreter.
Die Opposition wirft der Regierung wiederum vor, den aktuellen Fall lediglich zu missbrauchen, um das eigene Ziel einer stärkeren Internetregulierung umsetzen zu können. “Der Regierung geht es in erster Linie darum, das Web als beliebte Plattform für regierungskritische Proteste zu kontrollieren”, heißt es in einer Oppositionserklärung. Die gegenwärtige Rechtslage sehe aber ohnehin bereits eine härtere Verfolgung von öffentlichen Rufschädigungen vor, wobei auch das Internet miteinbezogen sei. “Wenn die Politiker glauben, sie könnten solche Tragödien mit einem eigenen Gesetz gegen Cybermobber verhindern, umgehen sie den Ursprung des Problems”, kritisiert auch Jeon Jun Hee vom Seoul Metropolitan Mental Health Center. Allein im vergangenen Jahr seien bei der südkoreanischen Polizei über 10.000 Cybermobbing-Fälle behandelt worden.
Die Schauspielerin Choi Jin Sil wurde am 2. Oktober erhängt in ihrem Badezimmer aufgefunden. Ihre Mutter hatte gegenüber der Polizei bestätigt, dass Choi gegen Mitternacht betrunken heimgekommen sei und sich sehr über Gerüchte aufgeregt habe, die im Internet aufgetaucht seien. Darin wurde die Schauspielerin beschuldigt, einen Kollegen, der sich nur wenige Wochen zuvor das Leben genommen hatte, mit Schuldrückzahlungsforderungen in den Selbstmord getrieben zu haben. Laut Bericht war Choi vor einigen Jahren schon einmal Opfer von heftigen Cybermobbing-Attacken aus dem Internet. Nach Angaben der Polizei musste sie seitdem sogar Antidepressiva nehmen.
Genau daruf legt es die Cyber-Stasi „GoMoPa“ an. Nachfolgend publizieren wir eine Analyse der Firma Meridian Capital, die Opfer von „GoMoPa“ wurde und dann zurückschlug.

Die Cybermord-Opfer Lothar Berresheim, Dipl.-Ing. Paul Bösel, Andreas Decker, Herbert Ernst Meridian Capital, Bernd Pulch und Martin Sachs, klären über den kriminellen und serienmässig vorbestraften Ex-Gefängnissinsassen Klaus-Dieter Maurischat und seine GoMoPa-Erpresserbande auf:

Deep Throat: „GoMoPa“ & Hintermänner: Erpressung, Einschüchterung, Rufmord und Mord

„Erpressung, Einschüchterung, Rufmord und Mord“, sind wohl die täglichen Waffen des ominösen „NACHRICHTENDIENSTES“ „GoMoPa“ beichtet Deep Throat, ein Ex-Mitarbeiter des „NACHRICHTENDIENSTES“ „GoMoPa“.
Deep Throat, Berlin packt aus: „Seit einigen Monaten sind alle wichtigen „GoMoPa“-Figuren wie Klaus-Dieter Maurischat abgetaucht. Da wurde mir klar, dass die Polizei ihnen wegen „Wirecard“ und vielen anderen Delikten auf die Spur gekommen ist. Also habe ich so schnell es geht die Kurve gekratzt.“
Er selber habe nicht an diesen illegalen Aktionen teilgenommen, sondern nur logistische Hilfsdienste erbracht, sagt Hans. J. (der Name wurde aus sicherheitstechnischen Gründen anonymsiert).
Merkwürdig sei auch das angebliche Ableben von Stasi-Obrist Ehrenfried Stelzer gewesen, sagt J. „Man weiss nicht, ob jemand anders beerdigt wurde.“  Auch der Mord an Heinz Gerlach ging, laut Hans J. auf das Konto der mutmasslichen Kriminellen-Vereinigung „GoMoPa“.: „Die haben ihre alten Stasi-Verbindungen spielen lassen und mit Dioxin Heinz Gerlach aus dem Weg geräumt. Auch ich bin ihnen gefährlich geworden. Deshalb habe ich alle Verbindungen abgebrochen und bin weg.“
Hans J: „Maurischat ist nur das „Aushängeschild“ gewesen. Er kann nocht nicht einmal englisch sprechen. Die Organisation haben Stelzer und Rechtsanwalt Jochen Resch aufgezogen. Resch hat auch die „GoMoPa“-Texte verfasst, in denen es um „Anlegerschutz“ und angebliche Betrügereien ging.  Verantwortlich für die Computer-Kriminalität sind Thomas Promny und Sven Schmidt. “
Folgt man Hans J., so gab es Verbindungsmänner bei den Hostern Media-On, Türkei, und Go-Daddy, USA, sowie bei Google, Hamburg, die bei den Cyberstalking Delikten „nützlich“ gewesen sein sollen und sind.
Derzeit habe eine Spaltung der deutschen Kriminellen-Gruppe eingesetzt – verursacht durch den Fahnungsdruck sowie die schwindenen Geldreserven. Auch die Verbindung zu den russischen Hackern, die mit Denial of Service Attacken die Server der „GoMoPa“-Gegner zum Absturz brachten, sei abgebrochen – mangels Zahlung an die Russen.

Der „NACHRICHTENDIENST“ „GoMoPa“: Neuer Angriff auf die Immobilienbranche – Ermittlungen der KRIPO: ST/0148943/2011

Trotz zahlreicher Strafanzeigen, serienmässiger Vorstrafen und der mutmasslichen Verwicklung in mindestens einen hochkarätigen Mordfall erdreistet sich der „NACHRICHTENDIENST“ „GoMoPa“ die Immobilienzene uter Druck setzen zu wollen.
Unter der Schlagzeile „Immobilienverkäufer-Szene nervös!“ schreibt der „NACHRICHTENDIENST“: „Die Berliner Immobilienverkäuferszene Panik. Unter ihnen muss es einen oder mehrere Verräter geben. Wilde Gerüchte machen die Runde – Zu pikant, zu brisant waren die Informationen …“.
Und: „Der Artikel mit der Überschrift „Neue Fakten gegen die Bank“ in der neuesten Ausgabe der Zeitschrift Finanztest hat die Berliner Immobilienverkäuferszene in Panik versetzt. Unter ihnen muss es einen oder mehrere Verräter geben. Wilde Gerüchte machen die Runde – und die ersten Ratten verlassen das sinkende Schiff. Zu pikant, zu brisant waren die Informationen die der Bericht beinhaltete.

Wer waren wohl die oder Informant(en)?
Was veranlasste diese „auszupacken“?
Wer ist dieser oftmals……“
Die wilden Spekulationen sind leicht in das Anwaltskanzlei von „Anlegerschutzanwalt“ Jochen Resch zurück zu verfolgen, dem mutmasslichen „Gehirn“ des „NACHRICHTENDIENSTES“ „GoMoPa“. Offensichtlich soll hier durch Presseberichte Druck auf die renommierte DKB Bank ausgeübt werden, vorgeschlagene Vergleichsangebote von RA Jochen Resch zu akzeptieren
Deep Throat, Berlin: „Resch braucht den Vergleich mit der DKB Bank aus drei Gründen. Er braucht das Gekld dringend, er braucht die DKB als fallenden Dominostein, um dann weitere Opfer zu erpressen und drittens um sein „Netzwerk“ aufrecht zu erhalten. Wenn er innerhalb der nächsten drei Monate keinen grossen Erfolg vorweisen kann, bricht sein „Imperium“ zusammen.“
Der Informamnt aus dem Reschen „Netzwerk“ fährt fort: „Der „NACHRICHTENDIENST“ „GoMoPa“ sowie assoziierte Webseiten wie „Die Bewertung“, aber auch renommierte Medien wie „Finanztest“ sollen die DKB Bank sturmreif schiessen, wenn die DKB Bank diesen Vergleich verweigert, wird es schnell ganz ganz eng für Resch & Co..“
Story Background:

Dioxin-Täter: Die tödlichen Waffen des STASI „NACHRICHTENDIENSTES“: Der perfekte Mord

Siegfried Sievert oder Siegfried Siewert – das ist frei nach Hamlett hier die Dioxin-Frage. Ersterer ist der ehemalige Stasi-Agent und Dioxin-Nahrungsketten-Vergifter – letzterer Name das „Pseudonym“ von Klaus-Dieter Maurischat, dem serienmässig vorbestraften „NACHTRICHTENDIENST“-„GoMoPa“-Betrüge und Erpresser.
Im Netzwerk von „ „GoMoPa“ an prominenter Stelle sind RA Jochen Resch sowie der unter mysteriösen Umständen angeblich verstorbene bzw. verschwundene Stasi-Obrist Ehrenfried Stelzer und „Detektiv“ Medard Fuchsgruber.
Das Stasi-Problem war mit dem Zusammenbruch der DDR keineswegs beendet. Ehemalige Stasi-Mitarbeiter gelangten nach der Wende in höchste Positionen. In Brandenburg hatten es sogar mehrere ehemalige Stasi-Mitarbeiter bis in die aktuelle rot-rote Landesregierung geschafft, um dort die Regierung zu übernehmen. Auch in Sachsen-Anhalt könnten nach der Landtagswahl ehemalige Stasi-Mitarbeiter in die Regierung gelangen. Und auch in der Wirtschaft sind viele Stasi-Mitarbeiter in hohe Positionen gelangt. So auch der Herr Sievert. Doch was bezweckte dieser tatsächlich mit der Dioxinvergiftung? Handelte er wirklich aus Profitgier, oder war die bundesweite Vergiftung eine verspätete Rache der Stasi gegen den ehemaligen Klassenfeind?
Ebenso wie andere osteuropäischen Geheimdienste, z.B. der Geheimdienst der Ukraine beim Mordanschlag auf Präsident Viktor Juschtschenko -, benutzte die Stasi Dioxin und Dioxin-Experten:
Die Akte trägt die Registriernummer II 153/71, ist mehrere
Hundert Seiten dick. Auf dem Deckel ein Name: “Pluto“. Unter
diesem Decknamen spionierte Siegfried Sievert (58), der als Geschäftsführer
des Futtermittel-Herstellers Harles und Jentzsch mutmaßlich für
den Dioxin-Skandal verantwortlich ist, 18 Jahre lang für die
Staatssicherheit der DDR. Das berichtet die BILD-Zeitung (Freitagausgabe).
Auf Antrag von BILD gab die zuständige Birthler-Behörde die Unterlagen
jetzt heraus. Die Akten, so BILD, verraten: 1971 wurde die Stasi
auf den damals 18-jährigen Sievert aufmerksam. Sie beobachtete
sein “dekadentes Aussehen“, seine hohe Intelligenz und seine
“guten Verbindungen zu anderen jugendlichen Personenkreisen“.
Sievert wurde angeworben. Aus einem Bericht vom 16. März 1971:
“Der Kandidat kann zur Absicherung der Jugend (…) eingesetzt
werden.“
Sievert wählte laut BILD seinen Decknamen selbst, kassierte fortan
Prämien für seine “inoffizielle Mitarbeit“. In den Unterlagen
finden sich zahlreiche Quittungen, eine vom 6. November 1987:
“Hiermit bescheinige ich den Erhalt von 100 Mark für geleistete
Arbeit.“
Nach dem Abitur studierte Sievert in Greifswald Physik. Er machte
Karriere, spitzelte weiter, berichtete über intime Verhältnisse
seiner Kollegen. So notierte “IM-Pluto“ am 25. September 1986
über zwei Kollegen: “Die beiden beabsichtigen, gemeinsam die
BRD zu besuchen. Fakt ist jedoch, daß zwischen dem Kollegen und
der Kollegin seit langer Zeit Intimbeziehungen bestehen. (…)
Aus dieser Tatsache ist abzuleiten, daß eine gemeinsame Reise
in die BRD mit hoher Wahrscheinlichkeit für eine Flucht benutzt
wird.“
Skrupel zeigte Sievert laut Stasi-Akte keine. Ein Führungsoffizier
notierte: “Der IM hatte keinerlei Vorbehalte bei der Belastung
von Personen aus seinem Umgangskreis.“
1993 stieg Sievert beim Futtermittelhersteller “Harles & Jentzsch“
ein. 2005 wurde er alleiniger Geschäftsführer, steigert in nur
fünf Jahren den Umsatz von 4,3 auf rund 20 Millionen Euro, vervierfachte
den Gewinn.

Der beinahe perfekte Dioxin-Mord
Es wäre beinahe ein perfekter Mord gewesen. Übelkeit, Erbrechen, heftige Schmerzen, ein sich über Tage und Wochen verschlimmernder Krankheitszustand, ohne dass die Ärzte am Lauf der Dinge etwas Entscheidendes hätten ändern können. Der Patient wäre schließlich verstorben, und kein Gerichtsmediziner hätte nachweisen können, was die Ursache war.

So aber kam alles anders, als es um ein Haar hätte sein können.

Viktor Juschtschenko, der liberale, westlich orientierte Präsidentschaft der Ukraine, ist zwar – für alle Welt sichtbar – entstellt und wird wohl noch jahrelang an den Folgen seiner Dioxinvergiftung zu leiden haben, aber er lebt.

Aber es hätte um ein Haar anders kommen können.

5. September 2004, Geheimdienst
Im Kiewer Haus des stellvertretenden ukrainischen Geheimdienstchefs Volodymyr Satsyuk trifft sich Juschtschenko mit Geheimdienstchef Ihor Smeschko und anderen Geheimen zum Abendessen. Zur Speisenfolge gehörten Rahmsuppe, Sushi und Flusskrebse. In der darauf folgenden Nacht klagte Juschtschenko über heftige Bauch- und Rückenschmerzen, Übelkeit und Erbrechen. Vier Tage danach kam er, noch immer von heftigen Schmerzen geplagt, in einem mitternächtlichen Flug von Kiew zur Behandlung nach Wien ins 120 Jahre alte private Nobelspital Rudolfinerhaus. Die Kontakte liefen über Nikolai Korpan, einen aus der Ukraine stammenden, seit vielen Jahren in Wien tätigen Allgemeinchirurgen, der im Rudolfinerhaus als Belegsarzt ordiniert.

Michael Zimpfer, seit drei Jahren Präsident des Aufsichtsrats des Rudolfinerhauses sowie Vorstand der Universitätsklinik für Anästhesie und Allgemeine Intensivmedizin, der bei Juschtschenkos Aufnahme anwesend war, berichtet, die Ärzte hätten sich zunächst nur auf eine „deskriptive Diagnostik“ beschränken müssen – so ungewöhnlich war das Krankheitsgeschehen. Demnach wurde Juschtschenko „in einem kritischen, aber nicht sterbenden Zustand“ eingeliefert. Die Erstdiagnose lautete auf „akutes Abdomen“ (akuter Bauch).

Zunächst deutete nichts auf eine Vergiftung oder gar eine Dioxinvergiftung hin, wie sie etwa durch eine charakteristische Chlorakneerkrankung der Gesichtshaut erkennbar wird. Wohl zeigten sich im Gesicht des Patienten Hautrötungen, die von zwei hinzugezogenen Hautärzten zunächst als Rosacea, eine chronisch verlaufende Hauterkrankung unbekannter, vermutlich genetischer Ursache, gedeutet wurden. Weiters diagnostizierten die Mediziner einen Herpes zoster (Gürtelrose), eine leichte Gesichtslähmung sowie eine Ohrenentzündung.

11. September, Blutflecken im Darm
Weit dramatischere Befunde ergaben die Aufnahmen aus dem Computertomografen sowie die endoskopische Untersuchung von Magen und Darm durch den AKH-Gastroenterologen Eduard Penner. Demnach zeigten sich im Magen, im Zwölffinger- und im Dickdarm des Patienten geschwollene Blutflecken, auch Leber und Bauchspeicheldrüse waren stark angeschwollen, die Leberwerte im Blut deutlich erhöht – typische Anzeichen einer Leberentzündung (Hepatitis) und eines Leberzerfalls. Überdies zeigten sich an den Rändern der Bauchspeicheldrüse Flüssigkeitsaustritte, deutliches Signal für eine – von Ärzten besonders gefürchtete – Pankreatitis (Entzündung der Bauchspeicheldrüse).
Es bestand akute Lebensgefahr.

Denn die Pankreatitis birgt in sich die Gefahr, dass sich die Entzündung „selbst propagiert“ und das Organ „verrückt spielt“, wie es Intensivmediziner Zimpfer formuliert. In solchen Fällen sondert die Bauchspeicheldrüse nicht mehr die üblichen Verdauungssekrete in den Darm ab, um den Speisebrei in seine Bestandteile aufzulösen, sondern beginnt, mittels gewebszersetzender Stoffe, seine Umgebung zu verdauen. Außerdem bestand auch Gefahr, dass die Leberfunktion zusammenbricht – für das behandelnde Ärzteteam ein Albtraum.

Die Situation war umso dramatischer, als die Ursache von Juschtschenkos Erkrankung nach wie vor unbekannt war. Die Mediziner konnten vorerst nur versuchen, bekannte Erkrankungen nach und nach auszuschließen, wie etwa eine Fisch- oder eine andere Lebensmittelvergiftung, eine Immunerkrankung oder eine bakterielle oder virale Infektion. Aber im Blut fand sich bis auf den Herpes zoster keinerlei Erreger, auch ließ sich kein „Morbus“, also keinerlei Kombinationserkrankung, finden. Die Ärzte suchten, fanden aber nichts. Sie verabreichten dem Patienten Infusionen und organstabilisierende Medikamente. Aber damit war ihre Kunst auch schon zu Ende.

18. September, kritische Leberwerte
Acht Tage nach seiner Aufnahme im Rudolfinerhaus flog Juschtschenko zurück in die Ukraine, um sich wieder im Präsidentschaftswahlkampf zu engagieren – entgegen dem dringenden Rat der Ärzte, die Schlimmes befürchteten, weil sich die Leberwerte des Patienten weiter verschlechtert hatten. Am 30. September kehrte Juschtschenko wieder nach Wien zurück, um sich einer neuerlichen ärztlichen Behandlung zu unterziehen. Unterdessen klagte er über unerträgliche Rückenschmerzen, wie sie sonst allenfalls nach einem Unfall oder im Zusammenhang mit einem Bandscheibenvorfall auftreten. Doch die Abklärung im Kernspintomografen unter Beiziehung des bekannten Neurologen Heinrich Binder, des Ärztlichen Leiters des Neurologischen Krankenhauses im Maria-Theresien-Schlössl, ergab keinerlei Befund im Bereich der Wirbelsäule.

2. Oktober, unerträgliche Schmerzen
Um die unerträglichen Schmerzen zu lindern, verabreichten die Ärzte dem Patienten intravenös extrem hohe Dosen morphinartiger Medikamente. In einer nicht ungefährlichen Aktion injizierten sie ihm zusätzlich mittels Katheter ein Lokalanästhetikum neben das Rückenmark der Brustwirbelsäule, weil die durch nichts erklärbaren Schmerzen stärker wurden, obwohl sich Juschtschenkos Allgemeinzustand inzwischen leicht gebessert hatte. Die Ratlosigkeit der Ärzte wurde nur noch größer, nachdem sich auch bei der gerichtsmedizinischen Untersuchung von Harn- und Blutproben des Patienten „kein Hinweis für toxikologisch relevante Komponenten“ ergeben hatte.

Heute wissen sie, warum: Zwar gilt der Chefchemiker des Instituts für Gerichtsmedizin, Walter Vykudilik, allseits als hervorragender Detektiv mit der Pipette. (Er konnte unter anderem in den neunziger Jahren die von der „schwarzen Witwe“ Elfriede Blauensteiner mithilfe des Blutzuckermittels Euglucon begangenen Giftmorde an drei Pensionisten aufklären.) Aber es fehlen am gerichtsmedizinischen Institut jene Präzisionsgeräte, die man benötigt, um auch eine Dioxinvergiftung zu entdecken. „Man kann so eine Analyse ohne die entsprechenden Geräte, ohne die personellen und strukturellen Voraussetzungen nicht machen, das geht nicht“, sagt Vykudilik.

7. Oktober, ärztlicher Hilferuf
Weil die behandelnden Ärzte schon frühzeitig auf eine unbekannte biologische oder chemische Waffe getippt hatten, wandten sie sich weltweit an höchste Repräsentanten ihres Fachs, an wissenschaftliche Institute und internationale Organisationen um Hilfe bei der Aufklärung des schwierigen Falles: „Da die Erkrankung untypisch verläuft, ist auch der Verdacht des individuellen Einsatzes eines biologischen Kampfstoffes gegeben. Aufgrund der geschilderten Situation benötigen wir Ihre Hilfe und möchten Sie herzlich ersuchen, uns diese bezüglich chemischer Kampfmittel und biologischer Waffen zu gewähren“, heißt es in dem von Korpan und Zimpfer unterzeichneten Schreiben. Zugleich setzte sich Zimpfer telefonisch mit Kollegen in weltweit führenden Instituten der Toxikologie, darunter dem Center of Poison Control in Washington, in Verbindung, um mit ihnen die seltsamen Krankheitssymptome zu erörtern. Aber auch diese Gespräche blieben vorerst ohne Ergebnis.

Nach neuerlichem zehntägigem Aufenthalt im Rudolfinerhaus flog Juschtschenko, begleitet von Zimpfer und einer Wiener Ärztin, am 10. Oktober über Lemberg, wo Juschtschenko eine Wahlveranstaltung abhielt, nach Kiew, um sich dort in weitere ärztliche Behandlung zu begeben. Die Ärztin blieb als Beratungs- und Auskunftsperson in Kiew zurück.

Nun behauptete der vom Westen unterstützte Juschtschenko auch im Parlament in Kiew, er sei von Regierungskreisen vergiftet worden, was nicht ohne Wirkung auf die öffentliche Meinung in der Ukraine blieb: Der Kandidat der Opposition legte in allen Umfragen deutlich zu und schien gute Aussichten zu haben, nach dem ersten Wahlgang am 31. Oktober in die für 20. November angesetzte Stichwahl zu kommen und seinen Hauptrivalen Viktor Janukowitsch, den Kandidaten des Regierungslagers, zu schlagen. Zum Beleg seiner Behauptung legte Juschtschenko jenes ärztliche Schreiben vor, das zu den erwähnten Erschütterungen unter den Ärzten des Rudolfinerhauses führte.

22. November, Dioxin-Verdacht
Einige Wochen später war der Beleg für Juschtschenkos Behauptung auch in seinem Gesicht zu sehen: anthrazitfarben aufgedunsen, zerfurcht und mit Pusteln überzogen, die Augen verschwollen. Als der Londoner Toxikologe John A. Henry diese Aufnahmen sah, tippte er sofort auf eine Dioxinvergiftung. Die Furchen und Geschwulste in Juschtschenkos Gesicht seien allem Anschein nach eine Chlorakne, und die sei nun einmal charakteristisch für eine Dioxinvergiftung, sagte Henry gegenüber einem Redakteur des Londoner „Inde-pendent“.

Er verfüge zwar über keine toxikologische Evidenz zur Untermauerung seines Verdachts, aber seine Diagnose beziehe sich auf diese Bilder sowie auf den medizinischen Bericht, wonach Juschtschenko zwei Monate zuvor völlig gesund gewesen wäre. „Es gibt nur sehr wenige medizinische Konditionen, die innerhalb so kurzer Zeit zu dieser Art Veränderung führen können“, sagte Henry, der es für durchaus möglich hielt, dass eine einzige hohe Dosis Dioxin, versteckt im Essen, genügen würde, um jenen Effekt zu erzeugen, wie er nun in Juschtschenkos Gesicht zu sehen war.

11. Dezember, Dioxin-Bombe
Die Veränderungen in Juschtschenkos Gesicht, wie sie im Fernsehen und in Zeitungen zu sehen waren, waren auch Ärzten aufgefallen. So etwa tippte auch Hubert Pehamberger, der neue Vorstand der Universitätsklinik für Dermatologie, auf eine Chlorakne. Solche Vergiftungen sind zwar äußerst selten, aber es gab auch schon Fälle in Österreich, weil Dioxin auch bei normalen Verbrennungs- oder industriellen Produktionsprozessen anfällt.

Unterdessen hatten die Ärzte an Juschtschenko appelliert, wieder zu kommen, um sich weiteren Untersuchungen zu unterziehen. Schon zuvor wurden ihm in Kiew neuerlich Blutproben abgenommen und von einem bei der Prozedur anwesenden Zeugen in einer eidesstattlichen Erklärung als von Juschtschenko stammend bestätigt. Diese Proben gingen an mehrere Labors, darunter an ein EU-Referenzlabor in Amsterdam. Am Samstag, den 11. Dezember platzte dann die Bombe: In einer internationalen Pressekonferenz gab das behandelnde Ärzteteam in Juschtschenkos Gegenwart die Analyse des Labors in Amsterdam bekannt: Demnach enthielten die Blutproben derart hohe Dioxinwerte, dass eine exakte Bestimmung vorerst unmöglich war. In der Vorwoche bestätigten zwei weitere EU-Referenzlabors, Juschtschenkos Blutproben würden Dioxinwerte zeigen, die etliche tausend Mal höher liegen als die im menschlichen Blut vorhandenen Normalwerte.

Allerdings muss man bedenken, dass Juschtschenko eine außergewöhnliche, einmalige hohe Dosis Dioxin verabreicht bekam (50.000fach höher) und nicht über Jahre hinweg kein, gefährliche Dosen. Juschtschenkos Dioxinabbau darf daher nicht als Norm angesehen werden. Sein Körper ist trotz der ansehnlichen “Abbaukurve” nach wie vor verseucht.
Der Mordanschlag auf den ukrainischen Präsidentschaftskandidaten Viktor Juschtschenko zeigte der Weltöffentlichkeit deutlich, welche Gefahr Mordgifte in der Hand von Verbrechern sind.
Dioxine sind ein Sammelsurium hunderter Verbindungen, die hoch toxisch sind und den Stoffwechsel irreversibel ruinieren: Immungifte und Nervengifte.
Da die Laborversuche mit diesen Giften noch viel gefährlicher sind als mit Radioaktivität, kennt man nur die Folgen einiger weniger Verbindungen. Man interessiert sich aber auch nicht dafür, da mehrere tausend Menschen bei uns damit vergiftet sind. Am wichtigsten sind die Opfer der Holzgifte PCP und Lindan, die als technisches Abfallprodukt der Industrie zur billigen Entsorgung (!!) jahrzehntelang ungestraft auf die Decken von über 100 000 Kinder-
Zimmer gestrichen wurden.
Aufgrund der hohen Giftkonzentrationen im Menschen und in der Muttermilch haben die Arbeitsmediziner die Grenzwerte hoch oben angesetzt.
Arbeitsmedizinische Grenzwerte orientieren sich an den tatsächlich gemessenen Werten und nicht an der erforderlichen Schutzhöhe. So lagen rechtswidrig bei der krebserzeugenden Substanz PCP(Pentachlorphenol) die Grenzwerte im Blut bei 1000 µg/l, da nur dann fast alle darunter lagen. Heute liegen sie bei 50 – obwohl man weiß, dass mit der Nahrung nur maximal ein PCP-Wert im Blut von 5 µg/l erreicht werden kann. Zudem dürfte es für krebserzeugende Substanzen, die ja nach dem „Alles-oder-nichts-Gesetz“ wirken keine Grenzwerte geben.
So wie der ukrainische Attentäter vom Geheimdienst sicher straffrei ausgeht, gehen die Nachfolgetäter sicher auch straffrei aus. Nachweismethoden gibt es bisher nur für die Chlordioxine, die wesentlich giftigeren Fluordioxine, die entstehen, wenn man Fluorzahnpaste oder Fluorsalz geschluckt hatte oder die hochtoxischen Joddioxine, die entstehen, wenn in den Körper synthetisches Jodsalz kam, sind heute noch nicht nachweisbar, aber grosstechnisch federleicht herstellbar.
Dioxin ist im 21. Jahrhundert die Superbombe für Terroristen.

R.F., Berlin, ein intimer Kenner der RA-Kanzlei Resch und des „NACHRICHTENDIENSTES“ „GoMoPa“ legt nach: „Fast alle Texte der Webseite „GoMoPa“ werden in der Berliner Anwaltskanzlei von Resch verfasst. „NACHRICHTENDIENST“ „GoMoPa“ hat keine Redaktion. Die Aufgabe des vorbestraften Serienbetrügers Klaus Maurischat besteht vielmehr in der Bespitzelung und in der Erpressung. Intellektuell ist er gar nicht in der Lage, einen fehlerfreien Artikel zu schreiben. Meines Wissens her erhielt er seine Ausbildung bei der STASI. Aber selbst für den STASI-Obristen Ehrenfried Stelzer war er nur ein primitives Werkzeug.“
Nachfolgend ein schönes Beispiel für die „redaktionelle Zusammenarbeit zwischen „GoMoPa“ und RA Jochen Resch:
Zitat:
„GoMoPa: Sie bezeichnen sich selbst als Robin Hood, also als Wegelagerer. Doch Robin Hood gab seinen Gewinn den Armen. Sie stürzen Ihre Mandanten in Rechtsstreitigkeiten mit starken Gegnern und fraglichen Ausgängen. Am Ende sind Ihre Mandanten Ihre Anlage los und haben bei Ihnen auch noch 10.000 bis 20.000 Euro zahlen müssen, wenn sie keine Rechtsschutzversicherung haben.

Resch: “Die meisten unserer Mandanten verfügen noch über eine Rechtsschutzversicherung. Aber, wie kommen Sie auf 10.000 bis 20.000 Euro Honorar, das sind doch Phantasiepreise?!”

GoMoPa: Na, die Streitwerte liegen bei 100.000 Euro. Und wenn es dann durch alle Instanzen geht, über mehrere Jahre.

Resch: “Wir haben Streitwerte um die 60.000 bis 80.000 Euro. Manchmal 100.000 Euro. An Gebühren kommen da höchstens 2.500 Euro zusammen. Und in einigen Fällen haben wir auch mittellosen Mandanten unentgeltlich geholfen.”

GoMoPa: Aber 2.500 Euro reichen doch nicht, wenn es durch alle Instanzen geht.

Resch: “Nein, dass reicht nicht. Aber der Verlierer zahlt alles und wir gewinnen meistens die Prozesse. Im Ergebnis nehmen wir es von den Reichen, wie Robin Hood.”

GoMoPa: Nach eigenen Angaben im Internet bearbeiten Sie jährlich 2.500 Fälle, wie viele haben Sie schon gewonnen?

Resch: “Wir, die 22 Resch-Rechtsanwälte, haben im Schnitt 2000 Fälle im Jahr. Die Zahl schwankt erheblich. Wir machen eine kostenlose Ersteinschätzung, ob wir den Fall überhaupt annehmen. Wir wollen gewinnen oder zu mindestens einen guten Vergleich erzielen können. Sonst lehnen wir ab!

Über 90 Prozent unserer Prozesse gewinnen wir. Zunächst oft Musterverfahren, danach Vergleiche. In den letzten Monaten über tausend Vergleiche gegen Postbank und BAG. Ich kenne, mit Verlaub, keine Kanzlei, die über so lange Jahre so erfolgreich arbeitet. Für den Anleger, wohl gemerkt!! Klein und Mittelverdiener.”

GoMoPa: Ihr Insiderwissen und Ihre Argumentationen auf Vorträgen und auf Ihren Internetseiten sind sehr beeindruckend. Und die Szenarien bis hin zum 30jährigen Schuldenturm, in dem man als Anlage-Geschädigter landen kann, sind beängstigend. Allerdings fußt Ihr gesamtes Argumentations-Konstrukt auf einer These, die Sie nirgendwo beweisen oder belegen. Sie behaupten einfach, dass eine Wohnung nicht zu dem Preis weiterverkauft werden kann, zu dem man diese gekauft hatte. Bitte belegen Sie diese These.

Resch: “Versuchen Sie mal, ein von vornherein schlechtes Geschäft weiterzuverkaufen. Das geht nicht. Das Ganze läuft doch in Kurzfassung so ab. Vermittler rufen Telefonnummern aus Klicktel zwischen 15 und 21 Uhr der Reihe nach an. Die erste Frage lautet: Sind sie mit der Steuerpolitik einverstanden? Wer ist das schon? Die zweite Frage lautet: Wollen Sie jeden Monat 250 Euro haben? Wer will das nicht? Dann kommt der Vorschlag, die Lohnsteuern zu senken und das gewonnene Geld in eine Kapitalanlage zu investieren, eine vermietete Wohnung. Aus der Anlage könne man nach zehn Jahren aussteigen. Die Gemeinheit besteht darin, dass man 1.000 Euro Verluste haben muss und man nur von diesen 1.000 Euro Verlusten bei einem Steuersatz von 25 Prozent 250 Euro zurückbekommt. Man bleibt also auf 750 Euro Verlusten selbst sitzen, die man ja irgendwie aufbringen muss. Die reale Frage des Vermittlers hätte vollständig lauten müssen: Geben Sie mir 1.000 Euro, wenn ich Ihnen dafür 250 Euro gebe? Das würde natürlich keiner tun. Und der versprochene Ausstieg ist gar nicht möglich, weil man nicht mal so viel Geld bekommt, um den Kreditvertrag abzulösen. Sobald die Makler die Provision von 20 bis 30 Prozent in der Tasche haben, sind die Kunden nur noch Luft.”
Zitat-Ende
Wie katastrophal Klaus-Maurischat als „Journalist“ wirklich ist, zeigt sich am Besten an seinem Blog „Sch***hausfliege.“

„Die Akte Resch“ – wird immer spannender – wie “The Firm” oder “Die Firma”, ein Roman von David Grisham, verfilmt mit Tom Cruise, aber diesmal leider wohl bittere Realität:

„Die Akte Resch“ – wird immer spannender – wie “The Firm” oder “Die Firma”, ein Roman von David Grisham, verfilmt mit Tom Cruise, aber diesmal leider wohl bittere Realität:
R.F. in Insider, ein ehemaliger Mitarbeiter in der Kanzlei von „Anlegerschutzanwalt“ RA Jochen Resch, Berlin, behauptet: „Schon seit einiger Zeit läuf das grosse Geschäft mit „Schrottimmobilien“ nicht mehr für die Kanzlei Resch. Deswegen wollte er in neue „Geschäftsfelder mit „GoMoPa“ expandieren. Gerlach war dabei im Weg.“
Der Insider: „Durch die Verjährungsfristen und die Aufarbeitung vieler „Schrottimmobilien“-Fälle war die grosse Zeit der „Anlegerschutzkanzlei“ Resch schon seit einiger Zeit vorbei. Auch gegen „GoMoPa“ gab es immer mehr Widerstände im Markt und die Geldbeschaffung für die 60-Leute-Kanzlei-Resch und das Netzwerk aus „Anlegerschützern“  wurde immer schwieriger. Deswegen sollte das „GoMoPa“-Fondsrating nach dem kalkulierten „Abgang“ von Heinz Gerlach wieder Geld in die Resch-Kasse spülen. Einerseits durch die Platzierung eines „GoMoPa“-Emissionsprospekt durch Private Placement und dann durch ein „GoMoPa“-Fondsrating. Nach dem Motto: We nicht zahlt, wird durch „GoMoPa“ fertig gemacht.“
Der Insider fährt fort: „Durch einen Interview-Termin Reschs in der SA-1 Sendung „Die Akte“ kam er auf die Idee, die Webseite „Akte Heinz Gerlach.info“ zu starten. Damit war der Grundstock für den Rufmord an Gerlach gelegt. Die technische Infrastruktur legte der NACHRICHTENDIENST „GoMoPa“. Den Inhalt Hamburger Konkurrenten Gerlachs sowie Hacker, die sich über Trojaner in Gerlachs Computer einhackten. Durch monatelange Cyber-Attacken russischer Hacker wurde Gerlach sturmreif geschossen, weil seine Webseiten immer wieder offline waren. Zur Verschleierung behauptetete „GoMoPa“, Gerlach habe diese Angriffe gefahren. Als Gerlach dann der „Beratervertrag“ zwischen Estavis und „GoMoPa“ in die Hände gespielt wurde und er die New Yorker Briefkasten-Adresse von „GoMoPa“ durch seine Tochter, eine in New York lebende Rechtsanwältin enttarnte, verstand er die Zusammenhänge und musste sterben. Dabei spielten wohl der „NACHRICHTENDIENST“ „GoMoPa“,  “Wirtschaftsdetektiv“ Medard Fuchsgruber und Dioxin die Hauptrollen.“
Huintergrund:
„Heribert Hellenbroich, 53, Ex-Chef des Bundesnachrichtendienstes (BND) und zuvor Leiter des Bundesamts für Verfassungsschutz, begibt sich in ungewohnte Gesellschaft. Gemeinsam mit dem ehemaligen Stasi-Oberst und Offizier im besonderen Einsatz (OibE) Ehrenfried Stelzer, 58, hat Hellenbroich einen Verein gegründet. Das “Internationale Institut für Wirtschaftssicherheit zu Berlin” soll, so versichern der ehemalige Top-Nachrichtendienstler (West) und sein Kompagnon (Ost) unisono, aus “ideellen Motiven” Industriebetriebe in Fragen der Wirtschaftssicherheit beraten. “Selbstlos” (Satzung) wollen Hellenbroich und Stelzer für “störungsfreie wirtschaftliche” Ost-West-Beziehungen eintreten und zum Wohl der Unternehmer wirken: Wirtschaftskriminalität abwehren helfen, über Daten- und Banksicherheit aufklären“, schreibt der „SPIEGEL“ bereits 1990.

http://www.spiegel.de/spiegel/print/d-13502488.html
Und: „Berührungsängste mit dem Ex-Stasi-Offizier hat Hellenbroich nicht. Dessen Vergangenheit sei für die künftige Arbeit “nicht weiter von Interesse”, sagt der ehemalige BND-Chef, der 1985 über den Spionagefall Tiedge stolperte. Die rein nachrichtendienstliche Tätigkeit der Stasi sehe er ohnehin neutral: “Was haben wir, der BND, denn anderes gemacht?” Ehemalige Kollegen, die unter Stelzers Leitung in der Sektion Kriminalistik an der Ost-Berliner Humboldt-Universität gearbeitet haben, wundern sich über soviel Vertrauensseligkeit. Stelzer, seit 1961 Mitarbeiter der Stasi, sei ein Hardliner gewesen – einer, der “nach dem Motto ,Nichts geht über den geliebten Genossen Erich Honecker'” verfahren sei, sagt Horst Howorka, stellvertretender Leiter der Sektion Kriminalistik.
Die Humboldt-Universität hat Stelzer beurlaubt und gegen ihn ein Disziplinarverfahren eingeleitet. Der Ehrenausschuß der Uni hält es für “unzumutbar”, den Hellenbroich-Kompagnon weiter zu beschäftigen.“ Das war 1990.

Heute ist Ehrenfried Stelzers Vision Realität geworden. Stelzer und seine Mitstreiter und Nachfolger, haben es – 20 Jahre nach dem Fall der Mauer fast geschaft: Mit dem„NACHRICHTENDIENST“  „GoMoPa“ mutmasslich gesteuert von dem Berliner „Anlegerschutzanwalt“ Jochen Resch, einem wie er selber zugibt, langjährigen Bekannten, ja Intimus Stelzers, ist die CYBER-STASI entstanden, die ihre Gegner gnadenlos ausschaltet – „Wenn es sein muss auch mit Dioxin“, sagen Insider.
Stelzer, der angeblich mittlerweile verstorben sein soll, war der „ERSTE KRIMINOLOGE DER DDR“. Sein „GoMoPa“-Erbe ist hoch-toxisch und mit Dioxin verseucht.
„GoMoPa“ – alleine der Name des ost-Berliner „NACHRICHTENDIENSTES“ löst bei Betroffenen und Maurischat Opfern eine Mischung aus Entsetzen und Belustigung aus. Immer mehr aber überwiegt die Belustigung über den vorbestraften Serienbetrüger Maurischat alias Holbe alias Siewert. Der Grund: Viele seiner Opfer haben es ihm gleichgetan und zusammen mit anderen Geschädigten der mutmasslichen  „GoMoPa“-Rheinland-Fraktion „SJB-Fonds“, Neuss die Internet-Plattform http./www.sjb-fonds-opfer.com gegründet.
„Wir haben das Rezept aus Kolumbien“, schmunzelt SJB-Fonds-Opfer-Sprecher Heinz Friedrich (der Name wurde vond er Rdaktion aus Sicherheitsgründen anonymisiert). „ In Kolumbien gab es die „Los Pepes“, die haben den Drogen-Milliardär Pablos Ecobar aus dem Verkehr gezogen. Gegen die CYBER-STASI muss man ebenso vorgehen, denn die normalen Mittel des Staates scheinen gegen diese kriminelle Vereinigung zu versagen.“
Der CYBER-STASI geht es, wie vom kommunistischen Vordenker und „Ersten Kriminologen der DDR“ Ehrenfried Stelzer geplant, um die Infiltration der Wirtschaft.

An den  Beispielen Meridian Capital und Immovation AG zeigt sich am Besten, wie der „NACHRICHTENDIENST“ „GoMoPa“ die Immobilienbramnche erpressen will und wie sich gegen die CYBER-STASI „GoMoPa“ wehrt.

Das von „GoMoPa“ im Auftrag seiner dubiosen Hintermänner – Insider behaupten es sei, die Rechtsanwaltskanzlei Resch, Berlin,  – verleumdete Unternehmen Immovation verfolgte eine offene Kommunikationsstrategie, das war der Schlüssel zu Erfolge gegen die Erpresser von der CYBER-STASI:

„Erneut wehrt sich die Kasseler IMMOVATION Immobilien Handels AG, ein seit über zwei Jahrzehnten sehr erfolgreiches, bundesweit tätiges Unternehmen der Immobilienbranche, gegen die unverändert anhaltende Schmutzkampagne des sogenannten “Informationsdienstes” GoMoPa (mit Sitz im Ausland), dessen Gründer und “CEO” Klaus Maurischat ebenso wie Mitgründer Mark Vornkahl bereits wegen Betrugs verurteilt wurden. Der 2006 rechtskräftig verurteilte Maurischat gab sogar gegenüber dem Handelsblatt weitere Verurteilungen zu (Handelsblatt vom 07.04.2010), woraufhin das Handelsblatt wörtlich konkludierte: “Es ist allerdings nicht das erste Mal, dass GoMoPa-Vertreter ins Zwielicht geraten”.

GoMoPa suggerierte am 16. August 2010 in einer “Pressemitteilung”, dass IMMOVATION-Vorstandsmitglied Lars Bergmann sogar für den Sturz und das Karriereende des früheren brandenburgischen Ministers Professor Dr. Kurt Schelter durch Immobiliengeschäfte verantwortlich zeichne. In diesem Zusammenhang verweist die IMMOVATION AG auf eine schriftliche Mitteilung von Professor Dr. Kurt Schelter vom 18. August 2010:

“Diesen Zusammenhang gibt es nicht. Ich kenne Herrn Bergmann nicht und habe mit ihm persönlich keine Immobiliengeschäfte abgeschlossen. Mir ist auch nicht bekannt, dass Herr Bergmann etwa mit Verkäufern der von mir damals erworbenen Immobilien persönlich oder institutionell in Verbindung stand oder steht. Ich halte dies für ausgeschlossen.”

Minister a.D. Professor Dr. Kurt Schelter

Die IMMOVATION AG hat dieser eindeutigen Mitteilung von Herrn Professor Schelter nichts hinzuzufügen und unterstreicht erneut ihr volles Vertrauen in die Fähigkeit ihrer Klienten, Mitarbeiter und Vertriebspartner, sich selbst ein entsprechendes Bild von dieser Schmutzkampagne machen zu können, in der es dem Autor dieser verleumderischen GoMoPa-“Pressemitteilung” zudem nicht einmal gelang, das Amt des betreffenden Ministers korrekt zu bezeichnen: Im Gegensatz zu seiner Bezeichnung bei GoMoPa war Herr Professor Schelter nicht Finanzminister, sondern Minister der Justiz und für Europaangelegenheiten des Landes Brandenburg.

Die IMMOVATION AG hat im Zusammenhang mit dieser und zahlreichen weiteren unzutreffenden Behauptungen in dieser “Pressemitteilung” heute, 24.08.2010, beim Landgericht Berlin eine einstweilige Verfügung u. a. gegen Goldmann Morgenstern&Partners Consulting LLC (New York) und die GoMoPa GmbH (Berlin) beantragt. Mit der Verfügung soll den Antragsgegnern untersagt werden, die grob diffamierende Pressemitteilung zu verbreiten oder verbreiten zu lassen.“

http://www.finanznachrichten.de/nachrichten-2010-08/17777077-immovation-ag-frei-erfundene-behauptungen-des-informationsdienstes-gomopa-im-zusammenhang-mit-angeblichem-sturz-des-frueheren-brandenburgischen-min-007.htm

Und

„Nach den höchsterfreulichen gerichtlichen Erfolgen gegen den u. a. von rechtskräftig verurteilten Betrügern betriebenen, im Ausland domizilierten “Informationsdienst” Gomopa geht die Kasseler IMMOVATION Immobilien Handels AG auch straf- und zivilrechtlich gegen den Wirtschaftsdetektiv Medard Fuchsgruber vor.
Dieser hatte den IMMOVATION-Vorständen Lars Bergmann und Matthias Adamietz im Frühjahr 2010 angeboten, unwahre, diffamierende Veröffentlichungen auf der Website der gomopa.net beseitigen zu lassen und weitere rechtswidrige Veröffentlichungen dieser Art zu verhindern. Diese beauftragten Medard Fuchsgruber entsprechend und entrichteten ein Honorar von insgesamt EUR 67.500,00. Entgegen allen Zusagen von Fuchsgruber erfolgen über Gomopa jedoch – insbesondere seit Juli diesen Jahres – weiterhin schwer diffamierende Veröffentlichungen, gegen deren wesentlichste das traditionsreiche Kasseler Unternehmen in der Zwischenzeit bereits vor Gericht eine einstweilige Verfügung durchsetzen konnte (LG Berlin; Az.: 27 O 658/10).
Fuchsgruber ist – nach Entgegennahme des Vorabhonorars – offenbar seit Juni selbst “Kooperationspartner” bei Gomopa und wirbt sogar mit dieser Funktion, auch bei Gomopa wird das Engagement Fuchsgrubers besonders willkommen geheißen. Nach Auffassung der IMMOVATION hat Fuchsgruber damit von Beginn an über sein beabsichtigtes Engagement für die IMMOVATION getäuscht, was das Unternehmen im Rahmen einer Strafanzeige und eines Strafantrags inzwischen von der zuständigen Staatsanwaltschaft überprüfen lässt. Zudem hat die IMMOVATION das vorab bezahlte Honorar zurückgefordert und wird erforderlichenfalls den zivilrechtlichen Klageweg beschreiten.
Absurde Erklärungsversuche
Die von Fuchsgruber offenkundig in Journalisten- und Branchenkreisen zirkulierte Einschätzung, er hätte auftragsgemäß für IMMOVATION gehandelt, zielt völlig ins Leere: Denn nach seinem Einstieg bei Gomopa haben die über einen Serverstandort im Ausland verbreiteten Schmähungen nachweislich sogar zugenommen. Und schließlich: Selbst wenn dem so wäre, wie ließe sich dann der Umstand erklären, dass Fuchsgruber weiterhin als “Kooperationsparter” bei Gomopa fungiert, wenn doch nun für Gomopa öffentlich bekannt ist, dass Fuchsgruber im Auftrag der diffamierten IMMOVATION aktiv werden sollte?
Eine unmittelbare Beendigung der Zusammenarbeit Fuchsgruber und Gomopa wäre daher die logische Konsequenz, die jedoch bezeichnenderweise bis heute offenkundig ausgeblieben ist, was den von der IMMOVATION erhobenen Vorwurf weiter untermauert. Bemerkenswert ist darüber hinaus, dass sich der Einstieg Fuchsgrubers beim “Informationsdienst” Gomopa laut Medienberichten in enger zeitlicher Nähe zum Scheitern Fuchsgrubers beim Deutschen Institut für Anlegerschutz (DIAS) vollzog.“
http://www.ad-hoc-news.de/immovation-ag-strafanzeige-und-strafantrag-gegen–/de/News/21600105

Nunmehr aber kann niemand mehr bei „GoMoPa“ zustellen. Die Kriminalpolizei ermittelt: ST/0148943/2011

Und:

„FAZ berichtet über Gomopa-Machenschaften

Gezielt Gerüchte gestreut
Nach Informationen der F.A.Z. sollen unter anderem gezielt über den Finanznachrichtendienst Gomopa im Internet Gerüchte über Pennystocks gestreut worden sein. Gomopa steht für Goldman Morgenstern & Partners Consulting LLC. Auf ihrer Internetseite hat Gomopa „Transparenz in Sachen Finanzen, Vorsorge und Geldanlage“ versprochen, doch ihr Chef Klaus Maurischat saß als mutmaßlicher Betrüger schon in Untersuchungshaft.
Seit einigen Tagen ist die Internetseite http://www.gomopa.net offline, und es kursieren Gerüchte über finanzielle Unregelmäßigkeiten. Immer wieder ist Gomopa in juristische Streitigkeiten verwickelt. In einer einstweiligen Verfügung des Landgerichts Berlin vom 31. August (Az.: 27 O 658/10) ist das Unternehmen aufgefordert worden, nicht länger Falschinformationen über den Kasseler Immobilienhändler Immovation AG und seinen Finanzvorstand Lars Bergmann zu verbreiten. „Gomopa hat seinen Firmensitz bewusst in New York, weil die Firma dort presserechtlich nicht belangt werden kann“, sagte ein Kenner des Unternehmens der F.A.Z.“
http://www.faz.net/s/RubEC1ACFE1EE274C81BCD3621EF555C83C/Doc~EB5651ECDC72949FF907D2CA89D5AFE72~ATpl~Ecommon~Scontent.html

Meridian Capital lockte den Zuträger von „GoMoPa“- Erpresser in Berlin in eine Falle und erhielt von diesem dann die Info, wo sich Maurischat gerade aufhielt:

„Seitens der Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. gab es überhaupt keine Reaktion auf den Erpressungsversuch von GOMOPA. Ende August 2008 auf dem Service http://www.gompa.net sind zahlreiche Artikel/Meldungen erscheinen, welche die Tätigkeit der Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. in einem sehr negativen Licht dargestellt haben. Nachdem die auf http://www.gomopa.net enthaltenen Informationen ausführlich und vollständig analysiert worden waren, ergab es sich, dass sie der Wahrheit nicht einmal in einem Punkt entsprechen und potenzielle und bereits bestehende Kunden der Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. in Bezug auf die von diesem Finanzinstitut geführten Geschäftstätigkeit irreführen. Infolge der kriminellen Handlugen von GOMOPA und der mit ihm kooperierenden Services und Blogs im Netz hat die Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. beachtliche und messbare geschäftliche Verluste erlitten. Die Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. hat nämlich in erster Linie eine wichtige Gruppe von potenziellen Kund verloren. Was sich aber als wichtiger ergab, haben sich die bisherigen Kunden von der Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. kaum abgewandt. Diejenigen Kunden haben unsere Dienstleitungen weiterhin genutzt und nutzen die immer noch. In Hinblick auf die bisherige Zusammenarbeit mit der Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd., werden ihrerseits dem entsprechend keine Einwände erhoben .

Die koordinierten Schritte und Maßnahmen der Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. und anderer Beschädigter, geleitet von der Internationalen Wirtschaftspolizei INTERPOL, dem Bundeskriminalamt und der Staatsanwaltschaft der Bundesrepublik Deutschland haben zur Aus-, Einarbeitung und Durchführung der oben beschriebenen Falle beigetragen. Im November 2008 führte die in Berlin vorbereitete Falle zur Festnahme und Verhaftung des Vertreters des GOMOPA, der nach der Festnahme auf Herrn Klaus Maurichat – als den Hauptverantwortlichen und Anführer der internationalen kriminellen Gruppe GOMOPA verwies. Der Festgenommene benannte und zeigte der Bundeskriminalpolizei zugleich den aktuellen Aufenthaltsort des Herrn Klaus Maurischat. „Gehirn“ und Gründer dieser internationalen kriminellen Gruppe GOMOPA, Herr Klaus Maurischat wurde am selben Tag auch festgenommen und auf Frist verhaftet, wird bald in Anklagezustand gestellt, wird die Verantwortung für eigene Straftaten und die des Forums GOMOPA vor einem zuständigen Bundesgericht tragen. Die Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. unternahm bereits alle möglichen Schritte, damit Herr Klaus Maurischat auch auf der Anklagebank des zuständigen Gerichts des Vereinigten Königsreiches Großbritannien erscheint…“

http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:8jmni-h2e_4J:www.maurischatinhaft.wordpress.com/+verhaftung+klaus+maurischat&cd=2&hl=de&ct=clnk&gl=de&source=www.google.de

und hier

http://othergomopa.blogspot.com/

aus dem Jahre 2009 und nicht wie die von „GoMoPa“gebastelte Fälschung aus 2010.

Diese Vorgänge können gerne bei Meridian Capital überprüft und nachvollzogen werden.

Der  „NACHRICHTENDIENST“ „GoMoPA“ DIE CYBER-STASI DES 21. JAHRHUNDERTS

„Lauschen, spähen, schnüffeln: Vor 60 Jahren wurde die DDR-Staatssicherheit gegründet. Mehr als 91.000 hauptamtliche und doppelt so viele inoffizielle Mitarbeiter garantierten der SED die Macht. Ein Geheimdienst im klassischen Sinn war der Apparat nie, eher schon eine kriminelle Vereinigung mit tödlichen Methoden“, schreibt die angesehene Tageszeitung „DIE WELT“.

„Genau so verfährt auch der „NACHRICHTENDIENST“ „ GoMoPa“ , erläutert Rainer W. (Name wurde aus Sicherheitsgründen anonymisiert). Er war über mehrere Monate „inoffizieller“ Mitarbeiter des „NACHRICHTENDIENSTES“ „GoMoPa“, einem angeblichen Zusammenschluss jüdischer US-Rechtsanwälte namens Goldman, Morgenstern & Partner LLC, die noch nie jemand gesehen hat. Stattdessen sehen die Personen, die sich mit „GoMoPa“ beschäftigen nur die Totenkopfmaske stalinistischer STASI-Hacker, Erpresser und Cyberstalker.

Rainer W.: „Die eigentlichen Köpfe von „GoMoPa“ sind meiner Meinung nach wohl RA Jochen Resch und STASI-Oberst Ehrenfried Stelzer. Maurischat (ein Deckname) hat nicht das Format so eine Organisation aufzuziehen.“

Seit Jahren schon vesuchen die vorbestraften Serien-Kriminellen um das „Aushängeschild“ Klaus-Dieter Maurischat die deutsche Wirtschaft zu infiltrieren. Doch erst seit dem mutmasslichen Mord an Heinz Gerlach und den monatelangen Attacken gegen Haus sind viele Fakten recherchiert und zu Tage gekommen.

Vor allem über die Methoden des „NACHRICHTENDIENSTES“ – aber auch über dessen Hintermänner in Berlin, denn in New York existiert sowieso nur eine Briefkastenadresse und auch das „Büro“ in Berlin ist ein „virtuelles Regus-Büro“.

Die Fassade soll den „NACHRICHTENDIENST“ tarnen.

„DIE WELT“ schreibt: „40 Jahre lang, von der Gründung bis zu ihrer schrittweisen Auflösung zwischen Dezember 1989 und März 1990, war die Staatssicherheit der wichtigste Machtgarant der SED-Herrschaft. In dieser Zeit wucherte der Apparat immer mehr, bis schließlich mehr als 91.000 hauptamtliche Mitarbeiter für das MfS tätig waren.
Dieses Heer betreute eine Schattenarmee mit 189.000 „Inoffiziellen Mitarbeitern“ (IM). Statistisch gesehen kam in der DDR auf 55 erwachsene Bürger ein Vollzeit- oder Teilzeit-Stasi-Mann. Zum Vergleich: Im kommunistischen Polen lag das Verhältnis bei 1500 zu eins.
Der Apparat hat ungezählte Verbrechen zu verantworten. Darin folgte er seinen sowjetischen Vorbildern, der Tscheka (stolz nannten sich Stasi-Leute „Tschekisten“) und dem KGB. Vor allem aber prägte ein Mann das kriminelle Gebaren des MfS: Erich Mielke hatte sich schon als junger Mann 1931 als Attentäter in Berlin bewährt, als er im Auftrag der KPD zusammen mit einem Mittäter zwei Berliner Polizeioffiziere erschoss.
Der Doppelmörder konnte flüchten und führte im Spanischen Bürgerkrieg stalinistische Säuberungen in den eigenen Reihen durch. Im Sommer 1945 kehrte er nach Berlin zurück und übernahm sofort eine führende Position in der neu eingerichteten Polizei – interessanterweise in jenem Gebäude, das bis 1990 Sitz und Postanschrift der Staatssicherheit sein sollte.“
Zu den ungezählten Verrechen zählen Morde, Entführungen, Raub, Erpressung, Bespitzelung und jahrelange Gefängnishaft für Regime-Kritiker.
Jörg Berger flüchtete 1979 aus der DDR. Auch im Westen blieb die Stasi sein ständiger Begleiter. Jörg Berger berichtete vor seinem frühen Tod: „Nehmen wir den Fall des Spielers Lutz Eigendorf. Der war kurz vor mir geflüchtet und hat dann durch viel Medienpräsenz noch selbst dazu beigetragen, den Rummel anzufachen. Er starb bei einem Unfall auf der Autobahn, höchstwahrscheinlich hat ihn die Stasi vor seinem Tod geblendet. Entsprechendes findet sich jedenfalls in seiner Akte. Die Leute um Eigendorf waren die Leute, die ich auch um mich versammelt hatte. Dazu war er ein junger Spieler, ich ein gestandener Trainer. So hat man mir die Autoreifen zerstochen, auf der Autobahn löste sich ein Rad – und monatelang hatte ich Lähmungserscheinungen. Vermutlich von einer Bleivergiftung, die die Stasi initiiert hatte. Die haben mir wohl etwas in ein Getränk gemischt.“
„Der „Blitz“ traf Wilhelm van Ackern am 24. März 1955, kurz nach 22.30 Uhr – in Form von K.-o.-Tropfen in frisch gebrühtem Bohnenkaffee. Der vermeintliche Informant Fritz Weidmann hatte den 39-jährigen Fotohändler in eine konspirative Wohnung in der Kreuzberger Gneisenaustraße gelockt und ihm dort den vergifteten Kaffee serviert.
Nach wenigen Minuten wurde van Ackern übel; gestützt von Weidmann, verließ er die Wohnung. Doch auf der Straße erwartete ein weiterer Mann die beiden mit einem Wagen. Wilhelm van Ackern wurde im Schutz der Dunkelheit hineingestoßen und über die noch offene Sektorengrenze von West- nach Ost-Berlin ins Untersuchungsgefängnis Hohenschönhausen gefahren. Erst neuneinhalb Jahre später, teilweise verbüßt in der berüchtigten DDR-Sonderhaftanstalt Bautzen II, kam er frei und durfte zurück nach West-Berlin.“

Von Arsen bis Zyankali:
Der Giftschrank der Staatssicherheit

Themen

Archiv

Forum

Links

Kontakt

Hilfe zum Ausdrucken

21.1.2002

Autoren: Christian Nitsche, Sabina Wolf

Dieter Baumann ist nicht totzukriegen. Nach einer zweijährigen Dopingsperre geht er jetzt wieder an den Start. 1999 eine positive Dopingprobe. Dass er sich selbst gedopt hat, glauben heute nur noch seine Feinde. Und Feinde aus der ehemaligen DDR hatte er genug:
Dieter Baumann 1991:
„Trainer, die eben mit solchen Dingen zu tun hatten, mit Doping, die können vom DLV nicht weiter beschäftigt werden.“
Dieter Baumann 1994:
„Aber die Trainer und die Funktionäre, die haben es nämlich entschieden, dass man es macht. Und diese Leute hat man jetzt wieder.“
Dieter Baumann 1998:
„Für mich als Athlet, das beanspruche ja auch ich für mich selber, gilt als Nachweis eine positive Probe oder ein Geständnis.“
In Baumanns Zahnpasta fanden Kontrolleure das Dopingmittel Norandrostendion. Wie man Zahnpasta-Tuben mit Gift präpariert, kann man in den Stasiakten nachlesen: mit einem Glasröhrchen im hinteren Teil der Z-Tube.
Die Zeitschrift „Laufzeit“ im Osten Berlins fragte ein Jahr vor Baumanns Dopingtest nach einem „Messias“ der Antidopingbewegung und beendete den Kommentar mit dem Satz: „Muß man sich angesichts morgendlicher Hochform eines Tages gar fragen: Ist meine Zahnpasta noch sauber?“
Laufzeit-Chef Wolfgang Weising, früher Leichtathletikautor bei der NVA-Zeitung „Volksarmee“ – sagte gegenüber report AUS MÜNCHEN, diese Formulierung sei Zufall gewesen. Baumann, das Opfer eines Komplotts? Selbst die Tübinger Kriminalpolizei schließt heute aus, dass sich Baumann selbst gedopt hat. Auch wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen belegen: Er konnte seine Zahnpasta nicht nachträglich manipuliert haben. Baumanns größte Entlastung: die Dosis war niemals leistungssteigernd.
Baumann selbst will nicht öffentlich spekulieren, wer ihm das Dopingmittel unterjubelte. Es müsse aber jemand aus seinem engen Umfeld sein.
Dieter Baumann, Olympiasieger 1992:
„Ich glaube schon, dass die Täter sich verrechnet haben. Ich glaube, der Wunsch der Täter, soviel kann ich sagen, ist mein Eindruck, dass es mich überhaupt nicht mehr gibt im Sport. Und ich hab’ dann so ein Naturell, wo ich denke: Nee, wenn jemand so einen innigen Wunsch hat, dann sollte man den nicht erfüllen.“
Die Existenz von Kritikern vernichten, das war eine Aufgabe der Stasi. Der Rechtsmediziner Prof. Thomas Daldrup von der Universität Düsseldorf hat die sogenannte „Toxdat“-Studie der DDR untersucht – eine 900 Seiten starke Datenbank über Giftmordmöglichkeiten. Hier ist detailliert beschrieben wie sich selbst Laien Gifte beschaffen können und wie man einen Mord am besten verschleiert.
Prof. Thomas Daldrup, Präsident Gesellschaft für Toxikologische und Forensische Chemie:
“Hier ist so ein Beispiel für einen Stoff, den will ich nicht erwähnen. ‚Dieser Stoff erfüllt in hohem Maße Kriterien für ein zum perfekten Mord geeignetes Gift.’ Also, das kann man doch gar nicht anders lesen, als dass hier eine Anleitung zum perfektem Mord mit Gift gegeben wird. Hier ist es mal ganz klar ausgedrückt, aber das ganze Buch ist gefüllt mit solchen Informationen.“
Hinweise auf die Verschleierung provozierter Unfälle finden sich ebenfalls in Toxdat: „Vortäuschung von Verkehrsunfällen durch Auslösung von sekundenschneller Bewusstlosigkeit mittels Minigasgenerator in Belüftungsschächten von PKW.“
Da ist zum Beispiel der rätselhafte Verkehrsunfall des ehemaligen DDR-Fußballspielers Lutz Eigendorf im Jahr 1983. Vier Jahre zuvor war er nach einem Spiel in der Bundesrepublik nicht in die DDR zurückgekehrt. Er war ein leidenschaftlicher Autofahrer, seine Fahrweise risikovoll, das notierten die Spitzel der Stasi im Westen. Kurz vor seinem Verkehrsunfall stoppt die Stasi seine Fahrtzeit und die genaue Streckenführung seines täglichen Wegs vom Stadion nach Hause.
Zum Unfallhergang tauchen vor zwei Jahren neue Hinweise auf. Wurde Eigendorf gezielt geblendet? In den Giftakten der Stasi heißt es: „verblitzen, Eigendorf“. Hatte man Eigendorf heimlich ein pupillenerweiterndes Mittel verabreicht?
Die Staatsanwaltschaft Berlin kann Fragen dazu nicht beantworten, da eine Obduktion nicht angeordnet wurde, auch nach Auftauchen der neuen Stasidokumente nicht.
Ein weiterer Fall: Fußballtrainer Jörg Berger liest seine Stasiakten. Nach seiner Flucht aus der DDR wurde der Star-Trainer ´79 zum Staatsfeind.
Jörg Berger, Fußballtrainer Alemannia Aachen:
„Hier ist alles gesagt!“
Die Stasi wusste, dass Berger Angst hatte vor einem möglichen Auftragsmord, um weitere Fußballer vor einer Flucht abzuhalten:
„BERGER bekundete angeblich (…), daß es ihm nicht so ergehen soll wie EIGENDORF.“
Die Stasi glaubte, dass Berger der Drahtzieher war für die Republikflucht mehrerer Fußballer. Als Berger dann Mitte der 80er Jahre als Trainer auf dem Sprung in die 1. Bundesliga war und sich die DDR-Sportler Falko Götz und Dirk Schlegel nach Westdeutschland absetzten, schien Berger für die DDR unerträglich zu werden.
„Im operativen Vorgang ‚Ball’ wurde operativ herausgearbeitet, daß BERGER wesentlichen Anteil am Verrat von GÖTZ und SCHLEGEL hatte.“
Jörg Berger, Fußballtrainer, Alemannia Aachen:
„Es ist auch in diesen Aussagen zu erkennen, dass man mich berufsunfähig machen wollte oder dass man mich kaltstellen wollte in der Richtung, dass ich nicht mehr als Trainer arbeite, um da vielleicht auch nicht mehr die Einflüsse auf Spieler oder vielleicht sogar auf Trainer zu haben.“
1986 litt Berger unter rätselhaften Lähmungserscheinungen. Der Erklärungsversuch damals: eine Virusinfektion. Im Auftrag von report AUS MÜNCHEN hat der Rechtsmediziner Prof. Wolfgang Eisenmenger vor dem Hintergrund von Toxdat Bergers Krankenakten analysiert. Jetzt scheint festzustehen: Berger wurde vergiftet.
Prof. Wolfgang Eisenmenger, Klinikum Innenstadt der Universität München, Institut für Rechtsmedizin:
„Wenn man die laborchemischen Befunde aus dem Krankenhaus kritisch würdigt, muss man sagen, es spricht in Nachhinein nichts für eine durchgemachte Virusentzündung. Da die Schwermetallvergiftungen nicht gezielt untersucht worden sind, kann man sie aufgrund der Laborbefunde nicht ausschließen. (…) Es kommen – wenn man das Krankheitsbild würdigt – vor allem Schwermetalle aus der Gruppe der Bleiverbindungen und der Arsenverbindungen in Betracht.“
Die Anleitung, eine Arsenikvergiftung zu verschleiern – liefert ebenfalls wieder die DDR-Giftstudie Toxdat.
Frühere Stasi-Mitarbeiter wollten auch ihn ausschalten, das glaubt der Bundestagsabgeordnete Hartmut Büttner aus Hannover. 1995 hatte er einen mysteriösen Autounfall, der ihn beinahe das Leben kostete. Nach der Wiedervereinigung hatte der Abgeordnete zu den Hintermännern der „Toxdat“-Studie recherchiert und sich sehr für die Offenlegung der Stasi-Akten durch die Gauck-Behörde eingesetzt.
Hartmut Büttner, CDU-Bundestagsabgeordneter 1991:
„Ich halte es für skandalös, dass der mit dem Sektglas parlierende Altsozialist den Insassen von Bautzen völlig verdrängt hat.”
Als Büttner ´95 auf gerader, staubtrockener Straße verunglückte, findet keine Filigranuntersuchung des Wagens statt. Während er im Koma liegt, gibt die Polizei das Schrottauto frei. Eine Speditionsfirma zahlt dafür eilig das Sechsfache seines Werts. Büttner wurde mitgeteilt:
Hartmut Büttner, CDU-Bundestagsabgeordneter:
“Dieses Auto ist in der Tat ins ‚solvente Ausland’ – in diesem Fall nach Polen – geschickt worden. Und in Polen wurde dieser Wagen nach einer Woche als gestohlen gemeldet.“
Viele Unfälle und Erkrankungen von ehemaligen DDR-Systemkritikern scheinen noch lange nicht geklärt.

Ebenso wie der Todesfall Heinz Gerlach zur Gänze aufgeklärt werden muss
„DIE WELT“ berichtet: „Mielkes Leute pfuschten in das Leben von Millionen DDR-Bürgern hinein, zerstörten berufliche oder private Hoffnungen und zersetzten routinemäßig ganze Familien. Außerdem schädigte die Stasi im Laufe der Jahrzehnte Hunderttausende Menschen in der SED-Diktatur vorsätzlich, brach unangepasste Charaktere mit psychischem Druck.
In jedem DDR-Bezirk unterhielt das MfS eigene Untersuchungshaftanstalten, in Potsdam zum Beispiel in der Lindenstraße 54/55. In Berlin gab es neben der Zentrale in Lichtenberg die Stasi-Bezirksverwaltung Berlin, die bis 1985 in einem ehemaligen Krankenhaus an der Prenzlauer Allee und danach in einem 100 Millionen DDR-Mark teuren Neubau am Tierpark Friedrichsfelde amtierte, und das große Sperrgebiet in Hohenschönhausen, wo neben einem Gefängnis auch das streng geheime NS-Archiv der Stasi und technische Abteilungen saßen.
Neben der alltäglichen Unterdrückung stehen die schweren Gewalttaten des MfS; sie umfassen praktisch alle Paragrafen des DDR-Strafgesetzbuchs. So verschleppten Stasi-Kommandos im Laufe der Zeit mindestens 500, vielleicht aber auch bis zu tausend Menschen in die DDR – westliche Agenten, Überläufer aus den eigenen Reihen und SED-Kritiker vor allem. Einige von ihnen, zum Beispiel der vormalige Volkspolizei-Chef Robert Bialek, überlebten die Verschleppung nicht; andere, wie die „Verräter“ Paul Rebenstock und Sylvester Murau, wurden nach manipulierten Prozessen hingerichtet.
Ein juristisch verbrämter Mord war die Hinrichtung des MfS-Hauptmanns Werner Teske 1981. Er hatte mit dem Gedanken gespielt, in den Westen überzulaufen, allerdings nie einen konkreten Versuch dazu unternommen. Obwohl selbst das scharfe DDR-Strafrecht die Todesstrafe nur für vollendeten schweren Landesverrat vorsah, den Teske unzweifelhaft nicht begangen hatte, wurde er im Leipziger Gefängnis durch Genickschuss getötet.
Auch direkte Mordanschläge beging die Stasi. So lauerte 1976 ein Spezialkommando der Stasi, die „Einsatzkompanie der Hauptabteilung I“, auf westlicher Seite der innerdeutschen Grenze dem Fluchthelfer Michael Gartenschläger auf. Er wollte dort eine Splittermine vom Typ SM-70 abmontieren, die berüchtigte „Selbstschussanlage“. Vier Männer der Einsatzkompanie erwarteten ihn und eröffneten sofort das Feuer, als der langjährige politische Gefangene an den Grenzzaun heranschlich. MfS-Generalleutnant Karl Kleinjung, der Chef der Hauptabteilung I, hatte zuvor befohlen, „den oder die Täter festzunehmen bzw. zu vernichten“.
Auch der Schweizer Fluchthelfer Hans Lenzlinger wurde wohl im Auftrag des MfS 1979 in seiner Züricher Wohnung erschossen. Vielleicht war Bruno Beater, der ranghöchste Stellvertreter Mielkes und Experte für „nasse Jobs“, in den Anschlag verwickelt; aufgeklärt wurde dieser Mord aber nie.
Nicht das befohlene Ziel erreichten dagegen Mordanschläge gegen andere Fluchthelfer. Kay Mierendorff, der Hunderten DDR-Bürgern gegen fünfstellige Summen in die Freiheit verhalf, bekam im Februar 1982 eine Briefbombe zugeschickt, die ihn schwer verletzte und bleibende Schäden hervorrief.
Einen anderen „Hauptfeind“ der SED, den Fluchthelfer Wolfgang Welsch, vergiftete ein in seinen Kreis eingeschleuster Stasi-Agent im Sommer 1981 mit dem extrem toxischen Schwermetall Thallium; den Tod von Welschs Ehefrau und ihrer Tochter nahm der Stasi-IM billigend in Kauf.
Geplant, aber wohl nicht ausgeführt worden sind Mordanschläge auf Rainer Hildebrandt, den Kopf der DDR-kritischen „Arbeitsgemeinschaft 13. August“, die von ihrem Haus am Checkpoint Charlie aus das Unrecht der Mauer unnachgiebig anprangerte, und auf den Friedrichshainer Pfarrer Rainer Eppelmann, der unter Erich Honecker zeitweise als „Staatsfeind Nummer eins“ der SED galt. Umstritten ist dagegen, ob der DDR-Fußballstar Lutz Eigendorf 1983 von der Stasi durch einen vorsätzlich herbeigeführten Autounfall ermordet wurde. Vieles spricht dafür; der letzte Beweis ist in den allerdings bisher nur zum Teil sachgerecht erschlossenen Akten der Birthler-Behörde nicht aufgetaucht.
Noch öfter als potenziell tödliche Methoden wandten die Stasi-Experten allerdings das Mittel der Erpressung an. In verschiedenen Hotels für westliche Touristen in der ganzen DDR waren über den Betten Kameras eingebaut; auf interessante Ausländer wurden gezielt Prostituierte der Stasi angesetzt, um sie später mit kompromittierenden Fotos erpressen zu können. Das Gleiche versuchte das MfS auch mit Heinrich Lummer, dem West-Berliner CDU-Politiker. Über Jahre hinweg pflegte er eine geheime Beziehung zu einer Ost-Berlinerin, die in Wirklichkeit wohl von Anfang an als Spitzel auf ihn angesetzt war. 1981/82 versuchte das MfS, Lummer zu erpressen, was aber misslang.
Rund 40 Jahre lang garantierte die Stasi als „Schild und Schwert der Partei“ die Existenz der SED-Diktatur. Doch manches misslang Mielkes Mannen auch. So erwies sich beispielsweise die Suche nach den Autoren eines anonymen, kritischen Aufrufs als erfolglos, der 1969 an der Humboldt-Universität auftauchte. Trotz enormen Aufwandes und Kosten von rund einer Million DDR-Mark konnte das MfS die Verantwortlichen, die Studenten Rainer Schottländer und Michael Müller, nie überführen. So wurde ihr Protest zum „teuersten Flugblatt der Welt“.“

Insider Rainer W.:“Genau diese Methodenw erden heute von „GoMoPa“ und deren Hintermännern weider angewandt – natürlich verfeinert und mit Internet-Cyberstalking-Taktiken garniert.
Hinzu kommt der systematische Rufmord via Google und mit falschen Gerüchten, Erpresseranrufen, Morddrohungen, Cyberattacken, Kontoplünderungen und die Zerstörung von Geschäftsbeziehung durch
Systematisch gestreutes Misstrauen. Nehmen Sie all dies zusammen, dann haben Sie die STASI von heute: den „NACHRICHTENDIENST“ „GoMoPa“.“

Hintergrund:

Die Deutsche Kriminalpolizei hat weitere Ermittlungen gegen
den “NACHRICHTENDIENST” “GoMoPa”, deren serienmässig
vorbestrafte „Mitarbeiter“ sowie mutmassliche Hintermänner,
aber auch gegen Google aufgenommen. Das Aktenzeichen
lautet: ST/0148943/2011.
Die Beweislage in dem laut Insider “glasklaren Mordfall Heinz Gerlach”
verdichtet sich immer mehr.
Derweil versucht die ins Zwielicht geratene „Anlegerschutzanwalt“ Jochen
Resch mithilfe anderer „Anlegerschutzverbände“ Druck auf die angesehene
DKB-Bank auszuüben.
Kein Wunder, laut eigener Aussage hat RA Resch in seiner Anwaltskanzlei
fast 60 Leute auf der Payroll. Insider sagen: „Auch die „GoMoPa“-
Aktivitäten werden von Resch gesteuert und finanziert, da sowohl der
amerikanische Zweig des „NACHRICHTENDIENSTES“ „GoMoPa“ als auch
die deutsche „GoMoPa“ GmbH seit zwei Jahren –laut Bürgel – insolvent
sind.
Hinzu kommen weitere fragwürdige Aktivitäten im Reschen Netzwerk,
das – laut eigener Aussage in „GoMoPa“ sehr gut sein soll: „angebliche
Verbrauchervereine“, angebliche „Anlageschützer“ und angebliche „Journalisten“.
Kurz und gut: „Anlegerschutzanwalt Resch braucht pro Monat ca. €
400.000,- bis € 500.000,- , glaubt man seinen eigenen Angaben, um den
Laden am Leben zu halten.
Dies kann wohl nur schwerlich von Betrugsopfern finanziert werden…
Die DKB-Bank ist in Reschs Planung wohl der nächste „Zahlkandidat“.
Demzufolge brachte dann auch ein dubiose „Anlegerschutzverein“, den
niemand kennt, die stolze Meldung, die DKB sei zu Verhandlungen bereit,
bezugnehmend auf den „NACHICHTENDIENST“ „GoMoPa“ als Quelle.

Damit sollen wohl DKB und andere „Zahlkandidaten“ in die Pflicht
genommen werden, um das Reschsche Netzwerk weiter zu finanzieren.
„Schade, um die berechtigten Anliegen der Anleger, wenn sie auf
solche dubiosen Figuren und deren kriminellen Helfershelfer angewiesen
sind“, sagen sogar frühere Partner von Resch. Jochen Resch und
Heinz Gerlach – eine Beziehung, die jetzt wohl ganz neu aufgerollt
werden wird.
Ein Insider „Wir wissen, dass die Kriminalpolizei den Fall Heinz Gerlach
wieder aufnimmt – sicher auch mit Unterstützung des Bundeskriminalamtes.
Es gibt ein berechtigtes Interesse vieler Menschen und Institutionen
diesen Fall zur Gänze aufzuklären.“
All dies bestätigt die bislang gewonnenen Erkenntnisse über den
mutmasslichen Kriminalfall Heinz Gerlach:
Eines vorweg zur Klarstellung: Bereits in 1988 hatte unsere Redaktion
damals noch in dem Vorläufer-Publikation „Immobilien Magazin“
über die umstrittenen Geschäftspraktiken von Heinz Gerlach unter dem
Titel „Der Anlegerwolf im Schafspelz“ berichtet. Im darauffolgenden
Prozess konnten wir unsere Darstellung im Wesentlichen durchsetzen.
Wenn es allerdings um Rufmord oder gar Mord geht, gebührt auch
einem zu Lebzeiten umstrittenen Mann wie Heinz Gerlach Gerechtigkeit.
Diesen Selbstereinigungsprozess muss die Branche durchleben,
nur so ist eine positive Zukunft denkbar. Denn das, was Heinz Gerlach
geschah, könnte heute oder morgen auch Ihnen passieren.
Neue Details über den Zusammenhang zwischen „Anlegerschutzanwalt“
RA Jochen Resch, „NACHRICHTENDIENST“ „GoMoPa“ und „Akte-
HeinzGerlach.info“ zeigen deren enge Zusamnmenarbeit gegen den
umstrittenen „Anlegerschützer“ Heinz Gerlach beginnend mindestens
11 Monate vor seinem unerwarteten Ableben.
In einer Serie von Interviews hat RA Jochen Resch in dem „NACHRICHTENDIENST“
„GoMoPa“ sowie in der „Akte-Heinz-Gerlach.info“
über Heinz Gerlach geschäftliche Interna verbreitet – 11 Monate vor
seinem Tode, zumeist als „Der Anwalt“ und einmal sogar offen als „RA
Jochen Resch“. Beide Webseiten haben Analogien in Bezug auf ihre
Internet-Spuren (siehe weiter unten). Nachfolgende Unterlagen stammen
mindestens teilweise aus Gerlachs PC, der wohl von dem mutmasslichen
Stasi-Hacker Thomas Promny geknackt wurde.
Am 31.7.2009 erscheint folgender Artikel in der Akte-Heinz-Gerlach.
info

Zitat:
„Kaufte Schreinemakers Ex Heinz Gerlach frei?“
31.07.2009
Das Rätsel um die Schulden-Million von “Anleger-Papst” Heinz Gerlach
aus Oberursel (Hessen) bei der insolventen BFI Bank AG Dresden
(Sachsen) scheint endlich gelöst. Ein Rechtsanwalt aus der milliardenschweren
Fondsmarktszene meldete sich beim Finanznachrichtendienst
http://www.gomopa.net und lüftete das Geheimnis, das Gerlach bislang so sehr
hütete.
Der Anwalt: “Der Retter in der Not war nicht Gerlachs Dreiländer-
Fondskumpel Walter Fink (54) aus Stuttgart, der das inzwischen auch
bestreitet und wie es von einigen behauptet wurde. Der Fink ist doch
viel zu klein dafür. Der Retter soll Werner Klumpe, der für Fink die Fonds
(40.000 Geschädigte) mitkonzipiert hatte gwesen sein. Der 61jährige Ex-
Ehemann von Margarethe Schreinemakers soll Gerlach beim Insolvenzverwalter
der BFI Bank Dresden frei gekauft hat. Klumpe besitzt eine
große Rechtsanwaltskanzlei in der Luxemburger Straße 282 a in Köln
(Nordrhein-Westfalen). Einer seiner Anwälte soll den Schuldentitel gegen
Gerlach in voller Höhe bezahlt haben. Mit Zinsen belief sich die Summe
auf inzwischen rund 1,5 Millionen Euro. Vermittelt soll das Geschäft im
Übrigen der frühere Besitzer der Plenum Finanz AG (Easyfonds.com)
Martin Walter aus Zürich. Da war GoMoPa auf der richtigen Spur. Nur der
jetzige Boss der Firma, Raimond Schuster, weiß nichts davon.”
GoMoPa: Was hat denn Schreinemakers Ex-Mann mit dem selbsternannten
Anlegerschützer Gerlach zu tun, außer dass Gerlach mehrmals
in der TV-Sendung Schreinemakers live auf Sat.1 (4 Millionen Zuschauer)
Eigenwerbung machen durfte?
Der Anwalt: “Ganz einfach. Werner Klumpe ist seit 27 Jahren ein
sehr guter Anwalt für die Erstellung von Fonds-Prospekten. Er hat nur
einen Nachteil. Er ist zu teuer. Und weil er kaum Mandanten sprich Prospekt-
Initiatoren bekommen würde, braucht er einen, der ihm Mandanten
heranschaufelt. Einen Helfer wie Gerlach. Gerlach ist praktisch sein Vertrieb.
Nicht für ihn persönlich, sondern für seine Kanzlei. Klumpe selbst
hält sich ja neuerdings überwiegend im Ausland auf.”
GoMoPa: Wie könnte denn die Zusammenarbeit der Klumpe-Kanzlei
mit Gerlach funktionieren?
Der Anwalt: “Die Klumpe-Kanzlei vertritt Gerlach in allen Belangen,
führt ihn also als Mandanten und hat natürlich Schweigepflicht. Gerlach
soll wiederum der Kanzlei Mandanten zuschieben, und das soll so funktionieren.
Jemand plant eine Investition und legt dafür einen 100 Millionen
Euro schweren Fonds auf. Dafür braucht er einen Prospekt, der
gegen spätere und teure Haftungen rechtlich wasserdicht sein muss.
Dafür braucht man einen Rechtsanwalt aus dem Anlagenkapitalrecht.

Gerlach bietet dem Fondsinitiator eine Vorprüfung des Prospektes
an und schließt darüber einen Beratervertrag ab. Der Initiator zahlt das
Honorar zwischen 15.000 und 25.000 Euro, weil ihm Gerlach vielleicht
mit einem schlechten Rating in seiner Anlegerschutz-Postille droht. Hat
der Initiator angebissen, weil er ja nur Geld von Anlegern in dieser
Größenordnung bekommt, wenn die Anleger ihm vertrauen, kommt
von Gerlach eine vernichtende Nachricht. Die Papiere seien Schrott,
behauptet Gerlach. Der Initiator müsse einen neuen Prospekt erstellen.
Aber nicht mehr bei seinem bisherigen Anwalt, sondern bei einem
Anwalt, den Gerlach bestimmt.
Und das ist Werner Klumpe und Co. Der Grundpreis für den neuen
Prospekt ist derselbe, wie der alte gekostet hat. Das sind branchenüblich
100.000 bis 150.000 Euro. Der neue Prospekt von Klumpe hat auch
Hand und Fuß. Aber es sollen noch einmal Kosten von bis zu einem
Prozent des Fondsvolumens dazu kommen. Das sind also bei einem
Fonds von 100 Millionen Euro noch einmal 1 Million Euro Honorar für
50 bis 60 Seiten Prospektbeschreibung. Der Fondsinitiator zahlt das
nicht aus seiner Tasche, das müssen die Anleger zahlen. Gerlach würde
so zum Nachteil der Anleger die Fondskosten in die Höhe treiben und
wahrscheinlich teilt Klumpe das Extra-Honorar mit Gerlach. Die Kanzlei
richtet ihrem Mandanten ein Anderkonto ein. Darauf gehen die Provisionen,
und man zahlt davon Gerlachs Rechnungen und befriedigt
davon auch Gerlachs Gläubiger.”
GoMoPa: Also zahlte Gerlach seine Millionen-Schuld bei der BFI
Bank und den geprellten Anlegern von Anlegergeldern, die er durch
Kostenhochtreiberei bei Fondsinitiatoren verdiente?
Der Anwalt: “Inoffiziell ist das so. Offiziell stellt sich Gerlach vor
dem Finanzamt als praktisch pleite dar. Die jetzt veröffentliche Bilanz des
Einzelkaufmannes Heinz Gerlach und seiner Heinz Gerlach Medien AG
von 2007 gleicht einer Insolvenzverschleppung. Seit mehreren Jahren
führt Gerlach in der Bilanz einen Fehlbetrag von 1,5 Millionen Euro mit
Zahlungsziel ein Jahr auf. Das entspricht genau dem Betrag, den er der
BFI Bank und jetzt wahrscheinlich der Kanzlei Klumpe schuldet. Denn
er hat den Titel nicht gekauft, sondern wahrscheinlich Klumpe.”
GoMoPa: Aber warum sollte sich ein so angesehener Fonds-Anwalt
wie Klumpe auf Tricksereien mit einem Steuergehilfen einlassen?
Der Anwalt: “Gerlach ist laut und scheut sich nicht, die ganze
Aufmerksamkeit auf sich zu ziehen. Einer muss doch die Schmutzarbeit
machen und die Fondsinitiatoren erpressen. Das kann doch Klumpe
schlecht selbst machen. Obwohl Klumpe natürlich auch ein gerissener
Typ ist. Der Anwalt verlegte die Produktionsfirma von Schreinemakers
live (1992-1996, Goldene Kamera, Bambi) während seiner Ehe (die

Scheidung war 2007) nach Holland und machte sich selbst zum Geschäftsführer.
Die Einnahmen aus der in Deutschland ausgestrahlten Sendung
wurden in den Niederlanden zu sehr geringen Sätzen versteuert. Daraufhin
ermittelte die deutsche Staatsanwaltschaft wegen Steuerhinterziehung
und durchsuchte Klumpes Privat- und Geschäftsräume. Später
kam noch der Vorwurf der Anstiftung zur Untreue hinzu. Gegen eine
Millionenzahlung an wohltätige Zwecke wurde das Verfahren nach zwei
Jahren eingestellt.
Der Klumpe-Anwalt Wolfgang Arndt (58) boxte Gerlach im letzten
Jahr aus einem Insolvenzverfahren gegen die Heinz Gerlach Medien AG
heraus, weil Gerlach einer früheren Anwaltskanzlei seit 2003 ein Honorar
in Höhe von rund 250.000 Euro (AZ 63 IN 98/08, Insolvenzgericht Bad
Homburg) schuldete. Dreist hatte Gerlach zuvor getönt, bei ihm sei nichts
zu holen, sechs mal versuchte der Gerichtsvollzieher zu vollstrecken
– ohne Erfolg. Zur Abwendung der Insolvenz soll auch hier die Kanzlei
Klumpe eingesprungen sein. Man wollte schließlich nicht seinen Vertrieb
für Fonds-Mandanten verlieren.”
GoMoPa: Aber der Berliner Anlagen-Initiator Detlef Maruhn von
der Maruhn Immobilien GmbH & Co. Postsiedlung Dresden KG hat doch
am 10. August 2007 vor dem Landgericht Frankfurt Main gegen Heinz
Gerlach (wieder vertreten von Klumpe-Anwalt Wolfgang Arndt) ein Urteil
(AZ: 3-1102/07) erstritten, welches Gerlach bei Strafe von 250.000
Euro oder sechs Monaten Haft verbietet, “Initiatoren von Kapitalanlagen,
die Ihre Unterlagen nicht zur Verfügung stellen, ein ??-Rating (unzureichende
Transparenz) mit den entsprechenden Haftungsrisiken für den
Vertrieb zu erteilen und zu verbreiten oder anzudrohen”.
Der Anwalt: “Gerlach lässt jetzt die Fragezeichen in seinen Transparenz-
Ratings weg und schreibt einfach nur Rating nicht durchführbar.
Juristisch ist das dasselbe. Aber dazu müsste ein Fondsinitiator erst Mal
erneut klagen. Und wer will schon 100.000 Euro durch alle Instanzen
investieren, wenn am Ende bei Gerlach offiziell gar nichts zu holen ist?
Aber dafür steht man dann im Internet bei Gerlach auf einer Achtungsliste:
Rating nicht durchführbar. Wer will das schon?”
GoMoPa: Aber das Landgericht hat doch auch festgestellt, dass die
Fondsanbieter gar nicht verpflichtet sind, Gerlachs Einschätzung beim
Vertrieb mit anzuheften. Weil Gerlach selbst ein Player im Graumarkt ist,
also ein Mit-Wettbewerber oder Konkurrent. Das Gericht stellte fest: „Die
Heinz Gerlach Medien AG hat ein wirtschaftliches Interesse daran, von
den angeschriebenen Kapitalanlageinitiatoren die angeforderten Unterlagen
zu erhalten, da die Heinz Gerlach Medien AG im Zusammenhang
mit der Erteilung des ãã-Ratings entgeltliche Dienstleistungen anbietet.“
Der Anwalt: “Die Fondsanbieter streiten nicht gern öffentlich und
zahlen lieber Schweigegeld. Das nutzt Gerlach schamlos aus.”

Heinz Gerlach ist zu einer Stellungnahme nicht bereit.
Doch auf seiner Seite http://www.anlegerschutzauskunft.de/haftung.htm
schreibt Gerlach unter “Haftungsausschluss” selbst, was wirklich Sache
ist. Gerlach: „WICHTIG: Wir verwenden bei der Durchführung der
Anlegerschutz-Transparenz-Ratings ausschließlich Informationen, die
uns von dritter Seite zur Verfügung gestellt werden und die wir nicht
überprüft haben. Eine Haftung für die Richtigkeit, Vollständigkeit und
Aktualität der von uns zur Verfügung gestellten Informationen wird daher
nicht übernommen.“
Heinz Gerlach überprüft also keinerlei Informationen, die er mit
großem Getöse weitergibt. Wer aber Informationen nicht gegencheckt,
der ist nicht einmal ein ernstzunehmender Journalist (denn das gehört
zum Einmaleins eines jeden Redakteurs) und schon gar kein Anlegerschützer.
Denn von dem erwartet man zu Recht, dass er Informationen
gewissenhaft recherchiert, wertet und überprüft. Gerlach macht
nach eigenen Angaben nichts davon.
Doch nun droht Gerlach von Amts wegen juristischer Ärger wegen
Hochstapelei und Verstoßes gegen das Aktiengesetz, weil er eine Fälschung
beim Amtsgericht begangen haben soll.
Die Behörde hat eine Untersuchung gegen die Heinz Gerlach Medien
AG eingeleitet. Es geht um seinen Aufsichtsrat. Dort hat er seine
Geliebte Lenka Sychrova eintragen lassen und zwar als “Investment-
Analystin”. Doch in Wirklichkeit ist seine Freundin (sie stammt aus
Tschechien) Kosmetikerin. Bauchstraffung, Faltenbehandlung, Haarwuchsförderung
und Hautverjüngung bietet sie in Oberursel an.
Laut einem von Lenka Sychrova persönlich unterzeichneten Lebenslauf
war sie den größten Teil ihres Berufslebens als Sekretärin tätig.
1995 kam sie nach Deutschland und heuerte in München als freie Handelsvertreterin
bei der Staubsauger-Truppe “Kirby” an. Mit der Finanzbranche
kam sie erstmalig Mitte 1997 in Kontakt, als sie gemeinsam mit
einigen ihrer Staubsaugervertreterkollegen zu einem Versicherungsvertrieb
wechselte. Dort begann sie eine Ausbildung zur Fachwirtin für
Finanzberatung (IHK), die sie jedoch bereits nach wenigen Wochen
wieder abbrach. Offenbar war ihr Versuch, mit dem Verkauf von Versicherungen
ihren Lebensunterhalt zu verdienen, ebensowenig von Erfolg
gekrönt, wie zuvor mit Staubsaugern – und so schied sie bereits
Mitte 1998 wieder aus der Finanzbranche aus.
Mitte 1999 lerne sie Heinz Gerlach kennen. Die beiden sind seitdem
liiert. Ab diesem Zeitpunkt tauchte sie auch in dessen Impressum auf.
Und zwar als “Verantwortliche für den Themenbereich Investment und
Aktienemissionen”. Über Nacht hatte sie also die Kompetenz erworben,
Konzepte zu beurteilen, die von langjährigen, großteils studierten
Vollprofis entwickelt worden sind. Das ist auch vor dem Hintergrund

bemerkenswert, weil Gerlach mit Vorliebe Finanzdienstleister gern als
“Dilletanten” abqualifiziert. Nachdem diese Peinlichkeit im Gerlachschen
Impressum bald begann, Kreise zu ziehen, verschwand die Dame
nach einigen Monaten wieder aus dem Impressum des “Direkten Anlegerschutzes”.
Am Aufsichtsratsamt der Heinz Gerlach Medien AG hat
sich nichts geändert.
Lesen Sie im dritten Teil: Für wen schaufelt Gerlach noch Mandanten
herbei, wer gehört zu seinem Netzwerk? Und mit welchen Tricks
frisiert der Steuergehilfe Gerlach vermutlich seine eigenen Bilanzen?
Zitat-Ende
„Treibjagd im Anlegerschutzwald.“ Original-Text vom 4.8.2009:
Zitat:
“Für ein Jahressalär von 89.000 Euro, monatlich 7.500 Euro, darf
Heinz Gerlach ab sofort drei Immobilien-Fonds betreuen, vor denen er
Jahre lang auf seinem gefürchteten schwarzen Laufband im Internet
und seinen Newslettern gewarnt hat”, verrät ein Insider-Anwalt dem
Finanznachrichtendienst http://www.gomopa.net. Über Gerlachs neueste
Trophäe seiner Treibjagd im Anlegerschutzwald sagt der Anwalt: “Die
Verträge sind noch ganz frisch.”
GoMoPa: Welche Fonds sind denn betroffen?
Der Anwalt: “Es sind die ersten drei Fonds des heutigen Marktführers
in Deutschland für geschlossene Fonds, der SHB AG aus Aschheim
bei München in Bayern. Die Bundesanstalt für Finanzdienstleistung-
Dokumente zum Thema
» Gerlachs Millionenkredit
» Urteil gegen Gerlach
» Spiegel über Gerlach
Pressemitteilung zum Thema
» Teil 1: Heinz Gerlach – wo ist die Million geblieben?
» Teil 3: Heinz Gerlach: Treibjagd im Anlegerschutzwald
Beiträge zum Thema
» Heinz Gerlach “Direkter Anlegerschutz”
» Alpina KG Icon AG Procenta GmbH Bavaria GmbH
» Nepper, Schlepper, Bauernfänger
» BFI Bank Dresden, Würzburg
» Das Geschäft der Banken
» Gerlach Positivbewertung: ACI Alternative Capital Invest Dubai Tower
» BGH-Urteil: Klarheit für Anleger, Provisionen offenlegen
» Vermeintliche Anlegerschützer kassieren bei Gutgläubigen ab
» Akzenta AG und Gerlach Report
Quelle: http://www.gomopa.net/Pressemitteilungen.html? id=289&meldung=
Warum-kaufte-Schreinemakers-Ex-Heinz-Gerlach-frei

saufsicht hatte den drei Fonds Business Park Stuttgart, Carre Göttingen
und Erlenhofpark im Jahre 2005 eine Rüge erteilt, weil sie den 4.500
Anlegern eine 50prozentige Rückzahlung auf den Anlagenwert zusagten.
Die BaFin bestand auf eine Änderung der Verträge, dass die Rückzahlbarkeit
nur auf den wirtschaftlichen Wert zu leisten sei und auch
nur, wenn die Fonds nicht zahlungsunfähig oder überschuldet sind. Die
SHB AG hielt sich daran, aber Gerlach hatte nun einen Anlass, sich auf
die Fonds einzuschießen.”
GoMoPa: Der Erfinder der Fonds und Gründungsgesellschafter der
SHB, Horst Baron (53), sagte erst am 7. Juli 2009 auf der Hauptgesellschafterversammlung,
dass die Fonds tatsächlich nur dank der Ratensparer
am Leben sind. Wörtlich sagte Baron: “Selbst einen angenommenen
kumulierten Ausfall von 10 Prozent der Ratenzahler könnten die
Fonds aushalten. Bislang fielen noch bei keinem Fonds mehr als sieben
Prozent der Sparplananleger aus.” Welche Argumente hatte denn Gerlach
da noch?
Der Anwalt: “Gar keine. Gerlach warnte in seinen Anlegerschutz-
Reports einfach vor einer angeblich katastrophalen wirtschaftlichen
Situation, warf den Fonds vor, dass sie eine liquide Unterdeckung hätten
und die Ausschüttungen aus der Substanz der Ratensparer kämen.
Das war zwar problematisch, war bei diesen Fonds aber so gewollt und
geplant gewesen. Gerlach verlegte sich schließlich auf die persönliche
Diffamierung des fachlich absolut kompetenten Vorstandsvorsitzenden,
Horst Baron.”
GoMoPa: Warum war denn der Fondsexperte für den Fondslaien
Gerlach überhaupt angreifbar?
Der Anwalt: “1990, also elf Jahre vor der Gründung der SHB AG,
hatte Horst Baron Pech mit einem Geschäftspartner. Damals hatte
Baron 800.000 D-Mark in eine Firma eingezahlt. Der Geschäftspartner
unterschlug das Geld und setzte sich damit ins Ausland ab, verjubelte
es, wurde von der Polizei geschnappt und kam ins Gefängnis.
Baron musste Konkurs anmelden. Mit diesem Konkursverfahren vom 2.
Januar 1991 (AZ 32N774/90), deren Tilgung sich bis zum Jahre 2004
hinzog, verfolgte Gerlach den Vorstandsvorsitzenden bis zum Gehtnicht-
mehr. Baron trat genervt, offiziell aus familiären Gründen, am 31.
August 2008 zurück.”
GoMoPa: Hatte die SHB damit Ruhe?
Der Anwalt: “Die drei Fonds sind nach wie vor problematisch und
waren für Gerlach weiter Futter, um Vertriebspartner der SHB zu verschrecken.
Die SHB hatte 2008 einen Verlust von 13 Milionen Euro.”
GoMoPa: Welche Lösung gab es?

Der Anwalt: “Die SHB zauberte als Baron-Nachfolger für den
Vorstandsvorsitz den ehemaligen PR-Chef der Mutter-Gesellschaft Aragon
AG aus Wiesbaden in Hessen, Achim Pfeffer (39), aus dem Ärmel.
Der gab beim Amtsantritt offen zu, dass er von Immobilien keine Ahnung
hatte. Aber er wollte den angeschlagenen Konzern SHB mit 62
Mitarbeitern und 1.100 freien Vertriebspartnern sanieren. Und als PRMann
wusste er, wie man den Scheinjournalisten Gerlach ruhig stellen
kann. Seine Idee war, die drei alten problematischen Fonds auszulagern,
damit der Name SHB nicht mehr geschädigt werden kann, und
die Betreuung der Fonds an Gerlach zu übertragen. Die anderen Fonds
der SHB laufen schließlich ganz gut.”
GoMoPa: Wie soll denn die Auslagerung laufen?
Der Anwalt: “Über die Heliad Equity Partners GmbH und Co. KG
aus Frankfurt/Main. Das ist die zweite Mutter der SHB. Sie hat 13 Finanzunternehmen
mit 4.500 Beschäftigten und einen Jahresumsatz von
600 Millionen Euro. Sie soll helfen, die drei problematischen Fonds zu
verschleiern und zu verschieben, Hauptsache weg von der SHB. Der
neue SHB-Vorstandschef Pfeffer persönlich übernahm die Gespräche
mit Gerlach. Der nahm die Betreuung der Fonds, die er zuvor verteufelt
hatte, sofort an. Die zusätzlichen Kosten von 7.500 Euro monatlich
für Gerlach müssen nun die Anleger trotz geringer Rendite obendrauf
zahlen. Und damit Gerlach sagen kann, er habe nie ein Mandat von der
SHB erhalten, läuft der Betreuungsvertrag über die Heliad. Somit hat
sich die jahrelange Schmiererei Gerlachs gegen den Fondsprimus SHB
gelohnt.”
GoMoPa: Aber warum musste erst Pfeffer kommen, um den Deal
mit Gerlach einzufädeln?
Der Anwalt: “Nun, Pfeffer kam von der Aragon. Die Aragon hatte
mit Gerlach schon Ruhigstellungs-Erfahrungen gesammelt. Aragon-
Aktionär Christian Angermeyer wollte im Jahre 2002 VCH-Fonds mit
amerikanischen gebrauchten Risikolebensversicherungen an die Börse
bringen. Sie erwiesen sich als Rohrkrepierer. Angermeyer hätte das
gern gedeckelt. Doch Gerlach bekam davon Wind und hat Aragon ein
wenig provoziert. Gerlach schoss los: Anlegerverarsche, Schneeballsystem.
Man beruhigte Gerlach schließlich mit einem Beratervertrag.
Natürlich nicht bei der Aragon, das wäre ja zu plumb gewesen. Man
fand, dass der Vorstand der Aragon-Tochter BIT Treuhand AG in Frankfurt,
Jan Bäumler, einen Coach gebrauchen könnte. Ich glaube, Bäumler
und Gerlach haben sich nie gesehen. Als Bäumler zum 1. Januar
2009 aber BIT und damit Aragon verließ, hatte Coach Gerlach keinen
mehr zu coachen. Zum Glück holte ihn der Aragon-PR-Chef Pfeffer nun
zur SHB beziehungsweise zu deren Mutter Heliad als Coach für die
schlecht laufenden Fonds.”
GoMoPa: Aber Gerlach hat doch stets bestritten, dass er je Un-

ternehmerberater-Verträge abgeschlossen habe.
Der Anwalt: “Dann sehen Sie sich doch einmal den Beratervertrag
von Gerlach mit der ICC AG und späteren Aufina Holding AG an, die
mit 16 Millionen Euro Schulden an die Anleger in Insolvenz ging. Gerlach
stempelte den Vertrag mit seinem Eingangsstempel ab und schrieb
noch ein paar Änderungswünsche handschriftlich dazu. Der Vertrag
liegt in der Polizeiakte. Der ICC-Chef Rainer Möller wurde später verurteilt,
musste ins Gefängnis. Gerlach kassierte laut eigener Aufstellung,
die er der Staatsanwaltschaft (AZ 130Js 88/03) überließ, vom 9. Juni
2000 bis 11. Juli 2002 insgesamt 783.000 D-Mark (400.348 Euro), obgleich
er angeblich gar nichts tat.”
GoMoPa: Hat Gerlach ein Netzwerk, das ihn schützt?
Der Anwalt: “Außer der Rechtsanwaltskanzlei Werner Klumpe aus
Köln hat Gerlach nicht wirklich ein echtes Netzwerk. Klumpe soll konkurrierende
Ratinghäuser rigoros abmahnen, wenn Formalien nicht eingehalten
werden. TV-Moderator Friedrich Wanschka versucht, Gerlach regelmäßig
reinzuwaschen. Werden Gerlachs Machenschaften öffentlich,
darf dieser Stellungnahmen in Wanschkas Wmd-Brokerchannel abgeben.
Gerlach hat am 4. September 2008 zu Pressevorwürfen gegen sich
Stellung genommen, ohne die Vorwürfe wirklich zu entkräften. Wanschka
leitet die nach ihm benannte Consulting GmbH. Das Unternehmen
veranstaltet Wmd-Vertriebsgipfel und Wmd-Exklusivforen (mit Vorliebe
auf Mallorca), bei denen Gerlach seit Jahren Stammgast ist und als angeblicher
Experte Vorträge hält sowie Diskussionen moderiert.
Zu Gerlachs Dunstkreis gehört auch der Bund für soziales und ziviles
Rechtsbewusstsein e.V. (BSZ). Der von Horst Roosen geleitete
Verband verbreitet die Presseerklärungen auf Fachanwalt-hotline.de,
Kapitalanleger-echo.de, Rechtsboerse.de und Bsz-ev.de. Roosen ist
übrigens Pleite.
In ähnlichem Dienst für Gerlach sollen auch zwei Hamburger Rechtsanwälte
stehen. Auch sie sollen die Enten aus dem Direkten Anlegerschutz
aufgreifen und sie über das Internet verbreiten.
Und dann wäre da noch Ove Franz, er nimmt Gerlach regelmäßig
in Schutz. Als das Hamburger Magazin Der Spiegel 2008 Gerlachs Machenschaften
aufdeckte, war Ove Franz der einzige von zahlreichen Befragten,
der Gerlach unterstützte. Der 73jährige Ex-Politiker hatte sich
als Vorstand des Bankhauses Wölbern einen seriösen Ruf aufgebaut,
den er inzwischen zerstört hat. In Gerlachs Direkten Anlegerschutz schreibt
er bestellte Leserbriefe.”
GoMoPa: Aber was ist mit den 51 Anwaltsadressen, die Gerlach
auf seiner Seite Anlegerschutzauskunft.de veröffentlicht?

Der Anwalt: “Die Anwälte haben mit Gerlach persönlich nichts zu
tun. Sie lassen es zu, dass Gerlach sich mit ihren Namen schmückt, weil
sie natürlich als Anlegerschutzanwälte von Gerlachs negativer Berichterstattung
und der damit verbundenen Anlegerverunsicherung stark profi-
tieren. So bekommen sie viele Mandanten.”
GoMoPa fragte Anwalt Jochen Resch (59) aus Berlin, der zugleich
Vorsitzender der Verbraucherzentrale Brandenburg ist, was er von Gerlach
hält und warum er auf Gerlachs Webseite steht?
Resch: “Ich kenne Gerlach seit vielen Jahren, auch von persönlichen
Treffen bei Veranstaltungen. Es ist sehr traurig, er war am Anfang sehr
gut. Bis er sich im Jahre 2002 mit den Drei-Länder-Fonds von Walter Fink
und der BFI Bank Dresden einließ und wohl dabei zuviel Geld verdiente.
Ich habe zu Gerlach keine geschäftlichen Beziehungen. Fonds sind auch
nicht mein Metier. Ich werde mir die Seite anschauen, auf der ich erwähnt
werde, und gegebenenfalls reagieren.”
Zitat-Ende.
SJB-GoMoPa-Opfer vermuten, dass Resch diese Interna unter anderem
direkt aus dem von dem mutmasslichen Hacker Thomas Promny
geknackten Computer Heinz Gerlachs bezogen hat und diese dann
zunächst über den „NACHRICHTENDIENST“ „GoMoPa“ verbreitete.
„Rechtsanwältin Ludmilla Emilie Giese arbeitet im Bereich sogenannter
Immobiliensteuersparmodelle gegen Initiatoren, Verkäufer und
Banken“, heisst es auf der Homepage der sogenannten Anlegerschutzkanzlei“
Resch.
Für das GEGEN steht neben Reschs eigener Truppe von 60 Mitarbeitern,
vor allem der stets linientreue „NACHRICHTENDIENST“ „GoMoPa“,
der sich aus Ex-Stasi-Leuten vor allem aus der ehemaligen „DDR“ rekrutiert.
„NACHRICHTENDIENST“ hat die Aufgaben. „Aufklärung, AgitProp,
Bespitzelung, Rufmord, Erpressung und wenn jemand zu gefährlich für
die eigene Truppe wird, wohl auch Mord mit Stasi-Methoden wie mit
Dioxin.
Immer wieder präsentiert sich Anwalt Resch auf der Webseite von
„GoMoPa“ einem angeblichen Zusammenschluss jüdischer Anwälte aus
New York mit dem klingenden Namen Goldman, Morgenstern & Partner
LLc. Profan dagegen der Name „GoMoPa“ gebaut nach dem selben
Strickmuster, wie es viele Nachrichtendienste gerne tun – aus Abkürzungen.
In den USA würde es wohl GM & P LLC heissen, in Ostberlin hingegen
„GoMoPa“. Doch das sind nur Petittesen am Rande.
Den engen Zusammenhang zwischen der „Anlegerschutzkanzlei“
Resch und dem „NACHRICHTENDIENST“ „GoMoPa“ erkannte auch schon
die Redakteurin Renate Daum und schrieb;

„Der Anlegeranwalt Jochen Resch kommt neuerdings oft in den
Pressemitteilungen vor, die der Finanzdienst Gomopa ungefragt an Redaktionen
verschickt. Als „Deutschlands bekannteste Anlegerschutzkanzlei“
wird Resch Rechtsanwälte in einem Bericht über das Ende der
Noa Bank vorgestellt. Zu Schrottimmobilien äußert sich Resch, zu einem
Skandal um den Immobilienfondsanbieter Volkssolidarität. Die Offenheit
ist neu. Früher ging Gomopa Resch hart an und konfrontierte
ihn mit Vorwürfen. Doch einige Formulierungen in einer Teilhaberinformation
zur finanziellen Situation Gomopas vom Juli 2010 legen nahe,
dass der Sinneswandel vielleicht nicht nur Zufall ist.
Gomopa, eigentlich Goldman Morgenstern & Partners Consulting
LLC mit Sitz in New York, ist seit mehr als zehn Jahren aktiv. Auf der
Website ist unter den Fachautoren der bekannte Bestsellerautor Jürgen
Roth aufgelistet. Im Handelsregister der deutschen Zweigniederlassung
ist als Geschäftszweck an erster Stelle „wirtschaftliche Beratung, insbesondere
des Mittelstandes“ aufgelistet. Dazu gehöre „die Präsentation
von Firmen im Internet und anderen Medien“. Die Verbindung des Dienstes
mit einem Nachrichtenportal im Internet sieht Gomopa-Gründer
Mark Vornkahl nicht als Problem: „Ein Interessenkonflikt zwischen
kostenpflichtiger Beratung, Informationsabonnement und öffentlicher
Aufklärung ist uns seit Bestehen nicht untergekommen.“
Anwalt Resch spricht von Rechercheauftrag
Doch die Nutzer des Portals erfuhren bislang nicht, ob mit Personen
oder Organisationen, über die berichtet wurde, vertragliche Beziehungen
bestehen. Reschs Kanzlei war laut Teilhaberinformation zeitweise
eine wichtige Finanzierungsquelle von Gomopa. Darin berichtet Gomopa-
Mitgründer Klaus Maurischat, dass eine Vereinbarung mit der Kanzlei
„momentan 7500,- Euro im Monat einbringt – rund 25 Prozent unserer
monatlichen Kosten!“. Für „individuelle Mandantenanwerbung“ stehe
die Gesellschaft mit mehreren Anwaltskanzleien in Verhandlungen.
Anwalt Resch stellt zum Inhalt der Vereinbarung klar: „Wir haben
einen einmaligen Rechercheauftrag erteilt, der im üblichen Rahmen
honoriert wird.“ Mit Mandantenbeschaffung habe das nichts zu tun.
Was Gomopa von einer Mandantenanwerbung hätte, ist auch unklar.
Denn Anwälte dürfen dafür nicht bezahlen. Auf unsere Anfrage zu dieser
und weiteren Fragen gab Vornkahl keine inhaltliche Antwort beziehungsweise
verwahrte sich gegen Zitate aus den entsprechenden Passagen
seiner E-Mail, weil er einem Mitbewerber „keine Auskünfte zur
Ausgestaltung unseres Geschäftsbetriebes gebe“. Das verblüfft, denn
BÖRSE ONLINE betreibt das Anlegerschutzportal http://www.graumarktinfo.
de, ist aber keine Unternehmensberatung. Gomopa betont dagegen,
nichts mit Anlegerschutz zu tun zu haben.
Bauträgergesellschaft als wichtige Finanzquelle
Eine wichtige Finanzierungsquelle von Gomopa war laut der Teilha-

berinformation auch eine Bauträgergesellschaft, gegen die Anwalt Resch
im Auftrag von Anlegern vorgegangen war. Im Zusammenhang mit deren
Muttergesellschaft Estavis war Gomopa sogar schon mit Nötigungsvorwürfen
konfrontiert worden. Als ein umstrittener Anlegerschützer einen
Vertrag des Immobilienkonzerns mit Gomopa in die Hände bekam, las
er eine Erpressung hinein. Auf seine Anzeige hin nahm die Staatsanwaltschaft
aber nicht einmal Ermittlungen auf. „Estavis wurde nicht erpresst“,
stellt ein Sprecher der Immobilienfirma klar. Die Estavis-Tochter
B&V schloss sogar einen neuen Beratungsvertrag ab und zahlte viermal
5000 Euro – in gegenseitigem Einvernehmen, wie der Estavis-Sprecher
betont.
Jüngst kam nun der Wirtschaftsdetektiv Medard Fuchsgruber – Aushängeschild
und Kooperationspartner von Gomopa – ins Gerede. Bevor
das Bündnis besiegelt wurde, bekam er im Frühjahr 2010 einen Auftrag
aus Kassel, wie die „Süddeutsche Zeitung“ berichtet. Der Wirtschaftsdetektiv
sollte herausfinden, wer hinter üblen Angriffen und Erpressungsversuchen
gegen Immovation stecke. In einem zweiten, davon
unabhängigen Schritt sollte Fuchsgruber versuchen, böse Berichte und
Kommentare bei Gomopa über das Immobilienhandelsunternehmen zu
unterbinden. Insgesamt erhielt er dafür 67 500 Euro….“
http://www.graumarktinfo.de/gm/aktuell/diskussion/:Gomopa–Anwaelte-
als-Finanzierungsquelle/616477.html
Dieser Artikel löste ein Erdbeben in der Branche aus, bestätigt er
doch, was viele insgeheim dachten, aber nicht zu sagen wagten: „Resch
benutzt „GoMoPa“ und „Detektiv“ Fuchsgruber, um Mandanten zu erpressen.
Genau n dieses Bild passte auch der angebliche „Beratungsvertrag“
zwischen Estavis und „GoMoPa“, den Heinz Gerlach enthüllte.
Damit kam der selber nicht unumstrittene Anlageschützer aus Bad
Homburg den Berliner Paten und Ihren Exekutoren gefährlich nahe,
zudem er eine Strafanzeige bei der Berliner Kriminalpolizei stellte und
seinen Kenntnisstand publizierte, Daraufhin wurden seine Webseiten
wochenlang von Cyberattacken lahmgelegt und kurze Zeit später starb
er völlig unerwartet…
Stasi-Morde mit Dioxin: Millionen von Menschen kennen das Thema
durch die Berichterstattung über den Dioxin-Skandal hervorgerufen durch
Stasi-Top-Agent Siegfried Sievert. Sein Namensvetter Siegfried Siewert
(ein Pseudonym) für einen „GoMoPa“-Mitarbeiter steht unter Mordverdacht
im Fall Heinz Gerlach.
Bei der Staatsanwaltschaft Münster ist eine Strafanzeige wegen versuchten
Mordes aus Habgier gegen den in den Dioxin-Skandal verwickelten
Futtermittellieferanten Harles und Jentzsch eingegangen. Schwere
Körperverletzung und Giftbeimischung lauteten weitere Vorwürfe, sagte
Oberstaatsanwalt Wolfgang Schweer.

Demnach hat ein Arzt aus der Nähe von Münster die Firma aus
Schleswig-Holstein angezeigt. Die Staatsanwaltschaft Münster wird den
Fall vermutlich an die Behörden in Oldenburg oder Itzehoe abgeben.
Dort laufen derzeit Ermittlungen wegen Verstößen gegen das Lebensmittelbedarfsgegenstände-
und Futtermittel-Gesetz.
Die Firma Harles und Jentzsch aus dem schleswig-holsteinischen
Uetersen hatte seit März vergangenen Jahres dioxinbelastetes Futterfett
an Abnehmer in mehreren Bundesländern ausgeliefert. Bundesweit
sind gegenwärtig rund 4.700 Betriebe wegen Dioxin-Verdachts
geschlossen
Chef der Firma Harles und Jentzsch ist der ehemalige Stasi-Top-
Agent und Dioxin-Panscher Siegfried Sievert.
Offensichtlich ist Dioxin bereits in der DDR-Zeit von Sievert im
Auftrag der Stasi benutzt worden.
Beweis: „Stasi-Akte des Dioxin-Panschers belegt: Harles & Jentzsch-
Geschäftsführer Sievert arbeitete 17 Jahre für die Stasi. Er trug
den Decknamen “IM Pluto”.
Die Akte trägt die Registriernummer II 153/71, ist mehrere Hundert
Seiten dick. Auf dem Deckel ein Name: “Pluto“. Unter diesem Decknamen
spionierte Siegfried Sievert (58), der als Geschäftsführer des
Futtermittel-Herstellers Harles und Jentzsch mutmaßlich für den Dioxin-
Skandal verantwortlich ist, 18 Jahre lang für die Staatssicherheit der
DDR.“
http://infokriegergreifswald.blogspot.com/2011/01/stasi-dioxinpanscher.
html
Die „Zeit“ schreibt:
Knapp 200 Seiten hat die Stasi-Akte von Siegfried Sievert. Der Chef
des Fettherstellers Harles und Jentzsch ist für den Staatssicherheitsdienst
der DDR tätig gewesen. Das geht aus Akten der Birthler-Behörde
hervor, aus denen die Süddeutsche Zeitung zitiert. Sievert sei 18 Jahre
lang bis zur Wende als IM Pluto geführt worden. Schon damals arbeitete
er für fettverarbeitende Betriebe wie dem VEB Märkische Ölwerke
in Wittenberge, schrieb die Zeitung weiter.
“Der IM hat keinerlei Vorbehalte bei der Belastung von Personen
aus seinem Umgangskreis”, zitierte die Süddeutsche Zeitung aus seiner
Akte. Weiter heißt es, dass Sievert nicht aus Überzeugung für die
Stasi arbeite, sondern nur, weil er “persönliche Vorteile/Nachteile in
Erwägung” ziehe. Sievert wollte sich laut der Zeitung auf Anfrage nicht
äußern.
Sievert ist Geschäftsführer des mittlerweile insolventen Fettherstellers
Harles und Jentzsch im schleswig-holsteinischen Uetersen. Die Firma
hatte dioxinbelastete Fettsäuren mit unbelasteten Fetten gemischt.
Die Fette wurden zu Futtermitteln verarbeitet und führten bundesweit
zur Dioxin-Belastung von Hühnern und Schweinen.
Derweil schrieb die Berliner Zeitung, dass der Fetthersteller Harles
und Jentzsch regelmäßig und in viel größerem Ausmaß dioxinbelastete
Fettsäuren gemischt und ausgeliefert haben soll als bislang bekannt.
Die Zeitung berief sich dabei auf Messergebnisse des Niedersächsischen
Landesamts für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (Laves).
Insgesamt 92 der 153 überprüften Fettproben haben Laves zufolge den
zulässigen Dioxin-Grenzwert von 0,75 Nanogramm pro Gramm überschritten.
Ein besonderes Merkmal der Ergebnisse ist, dass sich der Dioxingehalt
in den Proben eklatant voneinander unterscheidet. Der Dioxingehalt
lag bei 1,0, in anderen bei 11,7 und 28,7 Nanogramm, auch Werte
von 48,0 bis 61,6 Nanogramm kamen vor. Für die Ermittler erhöht sich
damit der Verdacht, dass das erhöhte Dioxin nicht zufällig in den Fetten
vorhanden ist sondern unterschiedlich belastete Fette vorsätzlich miteinander
vermengt wurden.
Alle Proben stammen aus der Zeit vom 11. November bis zum 13.
Dezember. Die Behörden schätzen, dass die Firma Harles und Jentzsch
in diesem Zeitraum rund 2500 Tonnen Futtermischfette hergestellt hat
und diese an 20 niedersächsische Futtermittelunternehmer lieferte.
Diese hätten dann die Fette mit anderen Futtermitteln weiterverarbeitet.
Daraus ergebe sich für Niedersachsen eine Futtermittelmenge von
25.000 bis 125.000 Tonnen, die auf diese Weise in der Nahrungskette
eingegangen sind.“
Beweise: http://www.zeit.de/politik/deutschland/2011-01/dioxinstasi-
sievert
http://www.shz.de/nachrichten/schleswig-holstein/artikeldetail/
article/111/dioxin-panscher-soll-als-im-pluto-fuer-die-ddr-stasi-gearbeitet.
html
http://www.bz-berlin.de/aktuell/deutschland/war-fett-dioxin-panscher-
bei-der-stasi-article1094984.html
Das Stasi-Problem war mit dem Zusammenbruch der DDR
keineswegs beendet. Ehemalige Stasi-Mitarbeiter gelangten nach der
Wende in höchste Positionen. In Brandenburg hatten es sogar mehrere
ehemalige Stasi-Mitarbeiter bis in die aktuelle rot-rote Landesregierung
geschafft, um dort die Regierung zu übernehmen. Auch in Sachsen-
Anhalt könnten nach der Landtagswahl ehemalige Stasi-Mitarbeiter in
die Regierung gelangen. Und auch in der Wirtschaft sind viele Stasi-
Mitarbeiter in hohe Positionen gelangt. So auch der Herr Sievert. Doch
was bezweckte dieser tatsächlich mit der Dioxinvergiftung? Handelte er
wirklich aus Profitgier, oder war die bundesweite Vergiftung eine verspätete
Rache der Stasi gegen den ehemaligen Klassenfeind?

Mit den Methoden der Stasi arbeitet auch der äussert dubiose „Finanz-
NACHRICHTENDIENST“ „GoMoPa“. Bespitzelung, Einschüchterung,
Erpressung, Falschnachrichten, Rufmordmord, Cybermord,
Hacking und wohl auch tatsächlicher Mord gehören zu dem täglichen
Repertoire der serienweise vorbestraften Kriminellen von „GoMoPa“.
Bereits Monate vor seinem Tode war Heinz Gerlach diesem dubiosen
„NACHRICHTENDIENST“ aus Ost-Berlin mit Tarnadresse in New York
und Tarnnamen angeblicher jüdischer Rechtsanwälte auf der Spur. Dabei
setzte er von Anfang an sein Leben aufs Spiel.
Denn er wurde mit Stasi-Methoden ausgespäht, bespitzelt und es
wurden seine Computer gehackt. So hatten die „NACHRICHTENDIENST“-
Aufklärer immer wieder brisantes Material, das sowohl auf der
„GoMoPa“-Webseite erschien (mittlerweile gelöscht) als auch auf der
Gerlach kritisch bis feindlich gesonnenen Webseite Akte-Heinz-Gerlach.
info, deren Verbindungsdaten auffallende Parallen zu dem „GoMoPa”-
Internet-Schattenreich vorweisen.
– Er kannte die kriminelle Vergangenheit der „GoMoPa“-Macher
– Er erkannte die Tarnorganisation in New York
– Er erkannte die mutmassliche Erpressung von Immobilienunternehmen durch die
Konstellation „NACHRICHTENDIENST“ „GoMoPa“ und „Anlegerschutzanwalt“ RA Jochen
Resch.
– Er wusste, dass seine Webseite durch Cyber-Attacken lahm gelegt wurden.
– Er war dabei die Rolle von Ehrenfried Stelzer, dem Top-Stasi-Agenten im Hintergrund
zu entschleiern
– All dies führte wohl zu einem Mordauftrag in klassischer Stasi-Manier mit Dioxin.
– An der Tat massgeblich beteiligt ist mit Sicherheit der vorbestrafte Serienbetrüger und
mutmassliche Stasi-Agent „Siegfried Siewert“ oder auch „Klaus Maurischat“ etc pp.
– Die genauen Tatumstände aufzuklären, ist Sache von BKA, LKA, der Kriminalpolizei
und weiterer Ermittler.
– Aber schon jetzt kann man das Tatszenario erkennen: Auch der Hausarzt von Heinz
Gerlach war wohl misstrauisch, was die Todesursache anbetraf. Er wollte den Totenschein
wohl erst nicht ausstellen mit der Todesursache „natürliche Todesursache.“
– In der Öffentlichkeit indes rollte nach der Todesnachricht das geplante Szenario ab.
Zuerst berichtetet der NACHRICHTENDIENST“ „GoMoPa“ von der Todesursache „Blutvergiftung“
– nur wenige Stunden nach dem Tode von Heinz Gerlach. Woher konnte
der „NACHRICHTENDIENST“ dies wissen ? Darüber gibt es keine Angabe in der numehr
von der Webseite des „NACHRICHTENDIENSTES“ „GoMoPa“ verschwundenen Meldung
vom Tode Heinz Gerlachs.
– Es war auch nicht die Meldung des „NACHRICHTENDIENSTES“ „GoMoPa“, der die
Branche und die Öffentlichkeit von dem angeblich natürlichen Tode Heinz Gerlachs
überzeugte:
Mit zwei Artikel entstand die Legende von der Blutvergiftung von Heinz Gerlach: Derm
heute verschwundenen „GoMoPa“-Artikel, der wenige Stunden nach dem Ableben
„Blutvergiftung“ als Todesursache angab und der zunächst auch von der überaus kritischen
Anti-Gerlach-Webseite Akte-Heinz-Gerlach“ in Zweifel gezogen wurde (Beleg
siehe unten).

Als Heinz Gerlach dann die Zusammenhänge zwischen der mutmasslichen
Erpressung des Berliner Immobilienhauses Estavis und „Go-
MoPa“ bzw Rechtsanwalt Jochen Resch erkannte, wusste er endgültig
zuviel und wurde für die „GoMoPa“-Hintermänner zu einer grossen Gefahr.
Dan wurde offenbar nachgelegt als die Zweifel an der wahren
Todesursache immer lauter wurden:
Zitat:
“14. Juli 2010 – Gerlach und die wahre Todesursache
Der selbst ernannte Anlegerschützer Heinz Gerlach starb an einer
zu spät erkannten Blutvergiftung
Der Mann, der dubiose Finanzsysteme durchschaute, erkannte das
feindliche System im eigenen Körper nicht
Hameln/Oberursel (wbn). Die Szene der Finanzdienstleister und
Anlageberater ist um eine schillernde Figur ärmer. Der Anlegerschützer
Heinz Gerlach ist am vergangenen Samstag in seinem Haus im hessischen
Oberursel gestorben.
In wenigen Wochen wäre er 65 geworden. Gerlach hat mit seiner
Internetseite „Direkter Anlegerschutz“ die Beteiligungsangebote des
Kapitalmarktes bewertet und sich in den 70er Jahren mit dem „Gerlach-
Report“ einen bemerkenswerten Ruf als Brancheninsider erworben. Die
Karriere des Steuergehilfen ist in der Finanzwelt beispiellos. Er hörte
das Gras wachsen – und wieder verwelken. Für die einen war er ein
unbeugsamer Held, für die anderen der Störfaktor schlechthin und erklärtes
ketzerisches Feindbild.
Kein Wunder: Es ging stets um viele Millionen Euro und verdeckte
Interessen. In einem Spiegel-Interview sagte er: „Ich habe hier jeden
Tag ‘Dallas’ oder ‘Denver’“. So kommt es nicht unerwartet, dass sich
jetzt schon Legenden um seinen unerwarteten Tod ranken. Angeblich
habe er sich das Leben genommen, wollen Stimmen aus dem Hintergrund
wissen. Die Wahrheit ist so profan wie traurig: Gerlach, der zu
den Indianern gehörte, die niemals weinen und keinen Schmerz kennen,
starb an den Folgen einer unterschätzten Nagelbettentzündung.
Daraus resultierte eine Blutvergiftung. Dies haben die Weserbergland-
Nachrichten.de aus dem engsten Umfeld des „ältesten Geldanlageschützers“
der Republik erfahren.
Die Sepsis (Blutvergiftung) gilt als der weithin unbekannte und meistunterschätzte
Killer in Deutschland. Diese außer Kontrolle geratene
systemische Entzündungsreaktion auf eine Infektion fordert ebenso
viele Todesopfer wie der Herzinfarkt. Bis zu 50 Prozent der Erkrankten
sterben trotz intensiver Behandlung im Krankenhaus. In Deutschland
erkranken – so die Schätzungen – im Jahr 150.000 Menschen an einer
Sepsis. Gerlach hat komplexe Finanzsysteme durchschaut – den systemisch
angreifenden Feind im eigenen Körper hat er unterschätzt.”
h t t p : / /www.we s e r b e r g l a n d – n a c h r i c h t e n . d e / i n d e x .
php?option=com_content&view=article&id=442:14-juli-2010-gerlachund-
die-wahre-todesursache&catid=1:-weserbergland-nachrichten
Dieser Artikel auf der Webseite der unbedeutenden Provinz-Zeitung
„Weserbergland Nachrichten“, die ein Ex-Stasi-Mann lancierte, beruft
sich auf das „engste Umfeld“ von Heinz Gerlach – ohne auch nur DEN
GERINGSTEN BELEG vorweisen zu können.
Somit wir das Märchen von der angeblichen „Blutvergiftung“ als
Agenda festgelegt.
Einen Tag später, am 15. Juli 2010 übernahm auch die Gerlachkritische
Webseite, deren Veranwortliche weiter im Dunkeln sind, diese
Agenda aufgriff und schrieben:
“Worte über Heinz Gerlach »
15.07.10
Heinz Gerlach: Die Todesursache steht offenbar fest
(Eigener Bericht)
Um Heinz Gerlachs plötzlichen Tod ranken sich diverse Gerüchte.
Die können nun ad acta gelegt werden. Denn die Weserbergland-
Nachrichten haben “aus dem engsten Umfeld” des “selbst ernannten
Anlegerschützers” erfahren, dass Gerlach “an den Folgen einer unterschätzten
Nagelbettentzündung” gestorben ist.
Die norddeutsche Tageszeitung schreibt weiter: “Daraus resultierte
eine Blutvergiftung.” An einer Sepsis sterben demnach jedes Jahr
genauso viele Menschen wie an einem Herzinfarkt.
Heinz Gerlach soll am Dienstag beerdigt werden.
Den Artikel im Original finden Sie hier: http://www.
we s e rbe rgl and-na chr i cht en.de / inde x .php? opt i on=c om_
content&view=article&id=442:14-juli-2010-gerlach-und-die-wahretodesursache&
catid=1:-weserbergland-nachrichten”
Ohne EIGENE RECHERCHE-und ohne den geringsten Beleg übernahmen
diese „INSIDER“ das Blutvergiftungs-Märchen.
Hinzu kommt die Internetseite http://www.akte-heinz-gerlach.
info/15-07-10-heinz-gerlach-die-todesursache-steht-offenbar-fest/ und
die Webseiten die „GoMoPa“ zuzuordnen sind, weisen auffallende Paralleln
auf.
Die Verbindungsdaten der Akte-Heinz-Gerklach.Info, gehostet in
der anatolische Internet-Klitsche Media-on sowie die der „GoMoPa“ und
deren Hintermänner .:
Godaddy ist der Haus-Hoster von ‘Gomopa’ und seit vielen
Jahren der Registrar der ‘Gomopa’-Homepage. Hier werden auch
zahlreiche ‘Gomopa’ zuzuordnende ‘Foren’ und ‘Blogs’ zugeordnet,
in denen fiktive Cyber-Aliasse ihr Unwesen treiben, das natürlich nie
mit Fakten belegt ist wie z.b. extremnews.com.
Registrant: Goldman Morgenstern an Partners LLC
Registered through: GoDaddy.com, Inc. (http://www.godaddy.
com)
Domain Name: GOMOPA.NET
Gehostet hier:
Server IP: 67.23.163.233 Server Location: Lockport, NY, 14094,
United States
Gomopa IP: 67.23.163.230 Gomopa server location: Asheville in
United States Gomopa ISP: Netriplex LLC
Pikant auch die Internetseite der immer wieder mit Gomopa in
Verbindung gebrachten Offshore-Firma Baker & Baker, Köln, wird
bei Godaddy gehostet.
Server IP: 208.109.181.34 Server Location: Scottsdale, AZ,
85260, United States
Von gekaperten Godaddy-IP-Adressen wurden und werden
auch zahlreiche Flooding-Angriffe geführt bzw. sogenannte Stalking-
Seiten gehostet, die so die Opfer eine Spezialität von Klaus
Maurischat seien.
Die Baker & Baker wurde bereits in der Schweiz wegen Vermögenslosigkeit
liquidiert. Siehe http://www.yasni.de/baker+offshore/
person+information und http://www.moneyhouse.ch/en/u/baker_
baker_consulting_group_ag_CH-170.3.014 .447-7.htm
Dieser Firma war Heinz Gerlach ein besonderes Dorn im Auge
Server IP: 95.0.239.251
Domain ID:D28959891-LRMS
Domain Name:AKTE-HEINZ-GERLACH.INFO
Created On:03-Jul-2009 08:59:55 UTC
Last Updated On:10-May-2010 18:16:59 UTC
Expiration Date:03-Jul-2011 08:59:55 UTC
Sponsoring Registrar:Alantron BLTD (R322-
LRMS)
Status:OK
Registrant ID:DI_11637039
Registrant Name:Linh Wang
Registrant Organization:Linh Wang1273487281
Registrant Street1:3617 Tower 1 Lippo Centre
Registrant Street2:
Registrant Street3:
Registrant City:Hong Kong
Registrant State/Province:Queensway
Registrant Postal Code:0000089
Registrant Country:HK
Registrant Phone:+000.5230064510
Registrant Phone Ext.:
Registrant FAX:+000.5230064510
Registrant FAX Ext.:
Registrant Email:// <![CDATA[
var prefix = 'ma' + 'il' + 'to';
var path = 'hr' + 'ef' + '=';
var addy68605 = 'info' + '@';
addy68605 = addy68605 + 'xchiang' + '.' + 'com';
document.write( '‘ );
document.write( addy68605 );
document.write( ” );
//–>\n
// ]]>
info@xchiang.com// Diese E-Mail-Adresse ist gegen Spambots geschützt! Sie müssen JavaScript aktivieren, damit Sie sie sehen können.// <![CDATA[
document.write( '’ );
// ]]>

wie man bei Durchsicht der Seite http://www.akte-heinz-gerlach.info unschwer
erkennen kann. Es geht und ging dabei um die Patenschaft
im grauen Markt der Kapitalanlagen.
Drehsscheibe Mediaon.com Eine wesentliche Rolle bei den illegalen
Offshore-Internet-Aktivitäten der Cyber-Kriminellen spielt
auch die Briefkastenfirma Linh Wang, Honkong, bei der die Seite
http://www.akte-heinz-gerlach.info registriert wurde, die bei dem dubiosen
Undergrund-Unternehmen Mediaon.com in der Türkei gehostet
wird, so die Opfer. Über diese Schiene wurden Dutzende
betrügerischer Erpresser-Sites der Cyber-Kriminellen registriert.
Admin ID:DI_11637039
Admin Name:Linh Wang
Admin Organization:Linh Wang1273487281
Admin Street1:3617 Tower 1 Lippo Centre
Admin Street2:
Admin Street3:
Admin City:Hong Kong
Admin State/Province:Queensway
Admin Postal Code:0000089
Admin Country:HK
Admin Phone:+000.5230064510
Admin Phone Ext.:
Admin FAX:+000.5230064510
Admin FAX Ext.:
Admin Email:// <![CDATA[
var prefix = 'ma' + 'il' + 'to';
var path = 'hr' + 'ef' + '=';
var addy78290 = 'info' + '@';
addy78290 = addy78290 + 'xchiang' + '.' + 'com';
document.write( '‘ );
document.write( addy78290 );
document.write( ” );
//–>\n
// ]]>
info@xchiang.com// Diese E-Mail-Adresse ist gegen Spambots geschützt! Sie müssen JavaScript aktivieren, damit Sie sie sehen können.// <![CDATA[
document.write( '’ );
// ]]>
Billing ID:DI_11637040
Billing Name:Tuce Kuyumcu
Billing Organization:Tuce Kuyumcu1273487281
Billing Street1:Market Street 45a
Billing Street2:
Billing Street3:
Billing City:Baidoa
Billing State/Province:Victoria Mahe Seychelles
Billing Postal Code:00000
Billing Country:HK
Billing Phone:+000.4834433490
Billing Phone Ext.:
Billing FAX:+000.4834433491
Billing FAX Ext.:
Billing Email:// <![CDATA[
var prefix = 'ma' + 'il' + 'to';
var path = 'hr' + 'ef' + '=';
var addy58510 = 'tuce.kuyumcu' + '@';
addy58510 = addy58510 + 'somali' + '.' + 'com';
document.write( '‘ );
document.write( addy58510 );
document.write( ” );
//–>\n
// ]]>
tuce.kuyumcu@somali.com// Diese E-Mail-Adresse ist gegen Spambots geschützt! Sie müssen JavaScript aktivieren, damit Sie sie sehen können.// <![CDATA[
document.write( '’ );
// ]]>
Tech ID:DI_11637040
Tech Name:Tuce Kuyumcu
Tech Organization:Tuce Kuyumcu1273487281
Tech Street1:Market Street 45a
Tech Street2:
Tech Street3:
Tech City:Baidoa
Tech State/Province:Victoria Mahe Seychelles
Tech Postal Code:00000
Tech Country:HK
Tech Phone:+000.4834433490
Tech Phone Ext.:
Tech FAX:+000.4834433491
Tech FAX Ext.:
Tech Email:// <![CDATA[
var prefix = 'ma' + 'il' + 'to';
var path = 'hr' + 'ef' + '=';
var addy7123 = 'tuce.kuyumcu' + '@';
addy7123 = addy7123 + 'somali' + '.' + 'com';
document.write( '‘ );
document.write( addy7123 );
document.write( ” );
//–>\n
// ]]>
tuce.kuyumcu@somali.com// Diese E-Mail-Adresse ist gegen Spambots geschützt! Sie müssen JavaScript aktivieren, damit Sie sie sehen können.// <![CDATA[
document.write( '’ );
// ]]>
Name Server:NS1.ANADOLUDNS.COM
Name Server:NS2.ANADOLUDNS.COM
Hier der Beleg über das Hosting der Anti-Gerlach-
Seite, AKTE-HEINZ-GERLACH.INFO, bei dem
Untergrund-Unternehmen Mediaon.com in der
Türkei gehostet: Linh Wang
Domain ID:D28959891-LRMS
Domain Name:AKTE-HEINZ-GERLACH.INFO
Created On:03-Jul-2009 08:59:55 UTC
Last Updated On:10-May-2010 18:16:59 UTC
Expiration Date:03-Jul-2011 08:59:55 UTC
Sponsoring Registrar:Alantron BLTD (R32
Mediaon Title: Anonymous Hosting – Privacy
Hosting – MediaOn.com is leading the marked in
privacy hosting.
Mediaon Keywords: Anonymous hosting, Whois
Protection, Whois privacy services, Privacy Hosting,
anonymous domain registration, managed
vps
Mediaon Description: MediaOn.com is leading in
anonymous hosting and privacy hosting.
Mediaon IP: 95.0.153.245 Mediaon server location:
Turkey Mediaon ISP: Turk Telekom IP:
95.0.153.245 IP Country: Turkey This IP address
resolves to dsl9539413.ttnet.net.tr
Idari Yonetici / Registrant (Admin) Ad / Name
Tekin Karaboga Adres Catalca Yolu Menekse Mevkii
Istanbul 34537 Tel +90.212.8656520

Diese Internet-Operations-Muster – so die SJB-Opfer – habe
es in Ihrem Falle, aber auch bei zahlreichen anderen Betrugs-, Erpressungs-
und Verleumdungsopfer in den letzten Jahren gegeben.
Nunmehr liegen und auch des heimtückischen Cyber-Mordes an
Heinz Gerlach können ermittelt werden’, so Heinz. F., Mayen, Sprecher
der Opfer (die Personen-Daten wurden aus Sicherheitsgründen
anonimysiert).
Wenn das BKA, LK, FBI und die Kriminalpolizei diesen Spuren
weiter intensiv nachgehen würden, seien die sowieso laufenden Ermittlungen
in zahlreichen Fällen wie auch im Kursmanipulationsfall
‘Wirecard’ von Erfolg gekrönt. Denn große Firmen wie Godaddy und
auch Enom, für die der Reseller Arvixe Domains verkauft, könnten
sich anders als ‘dubiose türkische Untergrund-Internet-Klitschen’ –
dem Zugriff der Justiz nicht entziehen.
„Neue Erkenntnisse in der Affäre Resch/GoMoPa-Stasi haben
wir recherchiert“, erläutert SJB.-GoMoPa-Sprecher Heinz Friedrich.
„Neben dem Stasi-Agenten und früheren Leiter der Kriminologie
an der Ost-Berliner Humboldt-Universität hat Rechtsanwalt Jochen
Resch den sogenannten „Wirtschaftsdetektiv“ Medard Fuchsgruber
(Photo oben) als Protege´ gefördert.
Fuchsgruber spielte eine besonders dubiose Rolle in den letzten
Tagen und Wochen vor dem Tode von Heinz Gerlach. Er sollte im
Auftrag der von „GoMoPa“ erpressten Kasseler Firma Immovation
AG Erkennntnisse über „GoMoPa“ sammeln und diese auch dem
„GoMoPa“-Kritiker Heinz Gerlach zur Verfügung stellen. Er hatte
jederzeit freien Zugang zu Heinz Gerlach und dessen Privaträumen.
8. Juli 2009 … Der Wirtschaftsdetektiv Medard Fuchsgruber
soll zum neuen Geschäftsführer des Deutschen Instituts für Anlegerschutz
(DIAS) gewählt werden“, meldete http://www.anlegerschutz.
tv/
Zwei Tage später starb Heinz Gerlach.
Am 10. Juli 2010 starb Heinz Gerlach angeblich an „Blutvergiftung“.
GoMoPa brachte die Meldung nur wenige Stunden nach dem
Ableben – mit der Todesursache „Blutvergiftung“ – diese Todesursache
kann sehr leicht und sher schnell durch Dioxinvergiftung herbeigeführt
werden. Diese „Pressemeldung“ ist inzwischen von der
Webseite der „GoMoPa“ verwschwunden.
Aber auch andere Insider, ausser uns haben sie gesehen:
Siehe hier in der Akte Heinz Gerlach::

„Zum Tode von Heinz Gerlach »
11.07.10 Sondermeldung
HEINZ GERLACH VERSTORBEN
(Eigener Bericht)
Heinz Gerlach ist tot. Am Sonnabend Abend ist der äußerst umstrittene
“Anlegerschützer” in Oberursel verstorben. Das vermeldet
der Finanzmarketingberater Michael Oehme in einem Rundbrief.
Heinz Gerlach wäre am 9. August 65 Jahre alt geworden.
Auf den Internetseiten der Heinz Gerlach Medien eK ist bislang
keine Bestätigung für diese Nachricht zu erhalten.
Die Todesumstände sind völlig unklar. Der Finanznachrichtendienst
Gomopa spekuliert, Gerlach sei einer Blutvergiftung erlegen.
Bei allen kritikwürdigen Geschäftsmethoden war Heinz Gerlach
ein Mensch, der eine Familie hinterlässt. Unser Mitgefühl gilt seinen
Angehörigen.
Wie und ob unsere Berichterstattung weitergeht, hängt davon
ab, auf welche Weise die Geschäfte des Unternehmens nach Heinz
Gerlachs Tod geführt werden.
Bereits vorbereitete Artikel und Enthüllungen werden wir aus
Pietät zunächst nicht veröffentlichen.“
http://www.akte-heinz-gerlach.info/11-07-10-sondermeldungheinz-
gerlach-verstorben/ (noch ist der Link verfügbar)
Während selbst die Gerlach-kritische Akte schreibt „die Todesursache
ist noch völlig unklar“, WEISS „GoMoPa“ BEREITS ZU
DIESEM ZEITPUNKT; das die ANGEBLICHE TODESURSACHE EINE
BLUTVERGIFTUNG WAR.
Von da an nahm die Legende ihren Lauf – über hessische Weserbergland-
Nachrichten, die keine Quelle angaben.
Wir erinnern uns, das Pseudonym von Klaus Maurischat (dessen
Lebenslauf und Identität wohl gefälscht sein dürften), ist Siegfried
Siewert. Siegfried Sievert ist ein ehemaliger Stasi-Agent und nunmehr
für den DIOXIN-Skandal verantwortlich.
Er gab zu im Auftrag der Stasi, BLUTFETT-VERSUCHE vorgenommen
zu haben.
“Dieser Kerl panschte Gift-Fett in unser Essen”, titelt die Bild-
Zeitung über den Chef des Futtermittelherstellers Harles & Jentzsch

aus Uetersen (Kreis Pinneberg). Gemeint ist Siegfried Sievert, 58
Jahre alt. Wer ist der Mann, der für einen der größten Lebensmittelskandale
Deutschlands verantwortlich sein könnte?
Der Unternehmer lebt in einer Villa in Kiebitzreihe (Kreis Steinburg)
und ist seit 16 Jahren bei Harles & Jentzsch in leitender Position
tätig. Seit 2005 ist er alleinvertretungsberechtigter Geschäftsführer.
Als nach dem Dioxinfund klar wurde, dass die verseuchte
Mischfettsäure nur für technische Zwecke verwendet werden darf,
erklärte Sievert: “Wir waren leichtfertig der irrigen Annahme, dass
die Mischfettsäure, die bei der Herstellung von Biodiesel aus Palm-,
Soja- und Rapsöl anfällt, für die Futtermittelherstellung geeignet
ist.”
Sievert hat sich für Qualitätsstandards stark gemacht
Diese Aussage erstaunt Branchenexperten, die mit Sievert gearbeitet
haben. Christof Buchholz ist Geschäftsführer des Deutschen
Verbands des Großhandels mit Ölen, Fetten und Ölrohstoffen (Grofor),
in dem 120 Unternehmen organisiert sind, darunter auch
Harles & Jentzsch. Buchholz sagt: “Ich kenne Herrn Sievert gut.
Er hat sich seit Jahren für hohe Qualitätsstandards stark gemacht,
insbesondere für das holländische System.” Dabei würden akribisch
all jene Gefahren aufgelistet, die eine mechanische oder chemische
Verunreinigung verursachen könnten – und Standards für die sichere
Produktion von Futtermitteln definiert.
Sievert dürfte demnach ein Experte für eine saubere Futtermittelproduktion
sein. Er besuchte auch die jährlichen Grofor-Treffen,
bei denen sich Experten aus ganz Europa austauschen. Wie
glaubwürdig ist dann seine Aussage, er habe angenommen, die
Mischfettsäure verwenden zu dürfen – zumal der niederländische
Lieferant Petrotec AG in Verträgen, Lieferscheinen und Rechnungen
darauf hingewiesen haben will, dass diese billigere Fettsäure ausschließlich
zur technischen Verwendung bestimmt sei?
“Wir können das nicht nachvollziehen”
Christof Buchholz: “Bei uns war die Überraschung groß. Es ist
ein No-go für Futtermittelhersteller, technische Mischfettsäuren zu
verwenden. Wir können das nicht nachvollziehen.” Er habe deshalb
Siegfried Sievert angerufen. “Wir haben ein kurzes Gespräch geführt.
Herr Sievert war verzweifelt und erklärte auch mir, dass er
dachte, das sei in Ordnung.” Während des Telefonats sei zudem
besprochen worden, woher die Dioxine gekommen sein könnten.
Christof Buchholz: “Herr Sievert wusste darauf keine Antwort und
klagte, dass es so viele Fragezeichen gebe.”
Seine erste Aussage hat er mittlerweile revidiert. Dem niedersächsischen
Agrarministerium teilte Harles & Jentzsch jetzt mit, das

dioxinverseuchte Industriefett sei versehentlich in die Produktion
gelangt. Ministeriumssprecher Gert Hahne: “Die Darstellung, da
hat einer den falschen Hahn aufgedreht, erscheint uns sehr unglaubwürdig.”
Sievert drohen drei Jahre Gefängnis
Die Staatsanwaltschaft Itzehoe ermittelt wegen des Verdachts
einer vorsätzlichen Straftat gegen Siegfried Sievert. Ihm drohen
wegen Verunreinigung von Lebens- und Futtermitteln bis zu drei
Jahren Gefängnis oder eine Geldstrafe. Außerdem droht eine Prozess-
Lawine. Auf was dürfen Landwirte hoffen, die auf Schadensersatz
klagen?
Die Harles & Jentzsch GmbH ist im Mai 1980 in Pinneberg gegründet
worden, zog 1994 nach Uetersen. Im Handelsregister gibt das
Unternehmen als Geschäftszweck an: Handel und Veredelung, Im-
und Export von Ölen, Fetten, Fettsäuren und deren Derivaten. Unter
dem Markennamen “Hajenol” verkauft Harles & Jentzsch Futterfett
für Rinder, Schweine, Geflügel und Legehennen, produziert aber
auch Industriefette für die Papierverarbeitung. Das Stammkapital
der GmbH betrug 1994 genau 537 800 Mark. Diese Summe scheint
zwischenzeitlich nicht erhöht worden zu sein, obwohl der Jahresumsatz
des Zwölf-Mann-Betriebs zuletzt 20 Millionen Euro betrug.
Sollte Harles & Jentzsch vorsätzlich gehandelt haben, wird die
Betriebshaftpflichtversicherung nicht einspringen. Der Bauernverband
geht von einem Millionenschaden aus. Es geht um mehr
als 1000 Landwirte, die ihre Höfe schließen mussten und deren
Tiere teilweise verbrannt werden. Als Entschädigung wird das
Stammkapital und selbst das Gesellschaftsvermögen nicht reichen.
Dem Vertriebschef der Firma zufolge soll am Donnerstag eine Bestandsaufnahme
erfolgen. Danach werde entschieden, ob Insolvenz
angemeldet werde. Gegen Sievert und seine Mitarbeiter hat es derweil
Morddrohungen gegeben. Am Telefon seien Mitarbeiter mit den
Worten “Wir machen euch fertig” bedroht worden, so Sievert.
Bild schreibt: –„ Die Akte trägt die Registriernummer II 153/71,
ist mehrere Hundert Seiten dick. Auf dem Deckel – in feiner Schreibschrift
– ein Name: „Pluto“. Unter diesem Decknamen spionierte
Siegfried Sievert (58) 18 Jahre lang für die Staatssicherheit der
DDR – der Futtermittelpanscher, der mutmaßlich für den deutschen
Dioxin-Skandal verantwortlich ist!
Auf Antrag von BILD gab die zuständige Birthler-Behörde die
Unterlagen jetzt heraus. Die Dokumente zeichnen das Bild eines
Mannes, der rücksichtslos ist, skrupellos und vor allem auf eigenen
Profit bedacht.
Rückblick. 1971 wird die Stasi auf den 18-jährigen Sievert

aufmerksam. Sie beobachtet sein „dekadentes Aussehen“, seine
hohe Intelligenz und seine „guten Verbindungen zu anderen jugendlichen
Personenkreisen“. Sievert wird angeworben. Aus einem
Bericht vom 16. März 1971: „Der Kandidat kann zur Absicherung
der Jugend (…) eingesetzt werden.“
Sievert wählt seinen Decknamen selbst, kassiert fortan Prämien
für seine „inoffizielle Mitarbeit“. In den Unterlagen finden sich zahlreiche
Quittungen, eine vom 6. November 1987: „Hiermit bescheinige
ich den Erhalt von 100 Mark für geleistete Arbeit.“
Nach dem Abitur studiert Sievert in Greifswald Physik. Er macht
Karriere, wird Geschäftsführer für „Absatz und Beschaffung“ in der
„Märkischen Ölmühle“ in Wittenberge (Brandenburg).
Eifrig spitzelt Sievert weiter, berichtet über intime Verhältnisse
seiner Kollegen.
So notiert „IM-Pluto“ am 25. September 1986: „Die beiden
beabsichtigen, gemeinsam die BRD zu besuchen.“ Zwei Kollegen
hätten angegeben, von einem Freund eingeladen worden zu sein.
„Fakt ist jedoch, daß zwischen dem Kollegen und der Kollegin seit
langer Zeit Intimbeziehungen bestehen. (…) Aus dieser Tatsache
ist abzuleiten, daß eine gemeinsame Reise in die BRD mit hoher
Wahrscheinlichkeit für eine Flucht benutzt wird.“
Skrupel zeigte Sievert laut Stasi-Akte keine. Ein Führungsoffizier
notiert: „Der IM hatte keinerlei Vorbehalte bei der Belastung von
Personen aus seinem Umgangskreis.“
Nach dem Mauerfall verlässt Sievert die Ölmühle. Ehemalige
Kollegen wundern sich über seinen Wohlstand, werfen ihm vor, er
habe Lieferungen der Ölmühle unterschlagen, dafür unter der Hand
kassiert. Ein Vorwurf, für den es derzeit keine Belege gibt.
1993 steigt Sievert beim Futtermittelhersteller „Harles & Jentzsch“
ein. 2005 wird er alleiniger Geschäftsführer, steigert in nur
fünf Jahren den Umsatz von 4,3 auf rund 20 Millionen Euro, vervierfacht
den Gewinn. Ein Futtermittelmischer aus Niedersachsen zu
BILD: „Solch ein Wachstum ist mit normalen Methoden unmöglich.“
Mit Panscherei möglicherweise schon: Das dioxinverseuchte
Tierfutter von „Harles & Jentzsch“ war durch das Einmischen von
Industriefetten entstanden. Die sind deutlich billiger als Futterfette.
Allein im November und Dezember 2010 soll Sieverts Firma
mindestens 3000 Tonnen verseuchtes Futterfett verarbeitet haben.

Etwa 150 000 Tonnen belastetes Futter könnten so in die Nahrungskette
gelangt sein.
Martin Hofstetter, Agrarexperte von Greenpeace zu BILD:
„Wenn man sich die Zahlen von ,Harles & Jentzsch‘ anschaut und
die bisherigen Erkenntnisse und Veröffentlichungen berücksichtigt,
kann man eigentlich nur zu einem Schluss kommen: Hier wurde
systematisch betrogen und gepanscht.“
UND: Stasi-Top-Agent Ehrenfried Stelzer war auch Professor für
Kriminologie an der Berliner Humboldt-Universität zu SED-Zeiten.
SJB-GoMoPa-Sprecher Heinz Friedrich kommentiert: „Der Verdacht
liegt nahe, dass hier eine Verschwörung zum Tode von Heinz
Gerlach geführt hat, der dieser Gruppierung im Wege stand. Auch
wir und unsere Angehörigen wurden mit Stas-Methoden bedroht
und eingeschüchtert.“ Und fügt er hinzu: „Wie das Dioxin in die
Blutbahn von Heinz Gerlach kam, werden diese Stas-Agenten und
ihre Mitverschwörer wohl wissen.“
Nach dem Tode von Gerlach wechelte Fuchsgruber endgültig
und offen die Seiten in das „GoMoPa“-Team und sollte auch als
DIAS-Geschäftsführer den Stasi-Agenten Ehrenfried Stelzer ablösen
– auf Betreiben des „Anlegerschutz“-Anwaltes RA Jochen Resch
(siehe unten).
Nachstehende Erklärung publizierte dann Immovation AG:
„Nach den höchsterfreulichen gerichtlichen Erfolgen gegen den
u. a. von rechtskräftig verurteilten Betrügern betriebenen, im Ausland
domizilierten “Informationsdienst” Gomopa geht die Kasseler
IMMOVATION Immobilien Handels AG auch straf- und zivilrechtlich
gegen den Wirtschaftsdetektiv Medard Fuchsgruber vor.
Dieser hatte den IMMOVATION-Vorständen Lars Bergmann und
Matthias Adamietz im Frühjahr 2010 angeboten, unwahre, diffamierende
Veröffentlichungen auf der Website der gomopa.net beseitigen
zu lassen und weitere rechtswidrige Veröffentlichungen dieser
Art zu verhindern. Diese beauftragten Medard Fuchsgruber entsprechend
und entrichteten ein Honorar von insgesamt EUR 67.500,00.
Entgegen allen Zusagen von Fuchsgruber erfolgen über Gomopa
jedoch – insbesondere seit Juli diesen Jahres – weiterhin schwer
diffamierende Veröffentlichungen, gegen deren wesentlichste das
traditionsreiche Kasseler Unternehmen in der Zwischenzeit bereits
vor Gericht eine einstweilige Verfügung durchsetzen konnte (LG
Berlin; Az.: 27 O 658/10).

Fuchsgruber ist – nach Entgegennahme des Vorabhonorars –
offenbar seit Juni selbst “Kooperationspartner” bei Gomopa und
wirbt sogar mit dieser Funktion, auch bei Gomopa wird das Engagement
Fuchsgrubers besonders willkommen geheißen. Nach Auffassung
der IMMOVATION hat Fuchsgruber damit von Beginn an über
sein beabsichtigtes Engagement für die IMMOVATION getäuscht,
was das Unternehmen im Rahmen einer Strafanzeige und eines
Strafantrags inzwischen von der zuständigen Staatsanwaltschaft
überprüfen lässt. Zudem hat die IMMOVATION das vorab bezahlte
Honorar zurückgefordert und wird erforderlichenfalls den zivilrechtlichen
Klageweg beschreiten.
Absurde Erklärungsversuche
Die von Fuchsgruber offenkundig in Journalisten- und Branchenkreisen
zirkulierte Einschätzung, er hätte auftragsgemäß für IMMOVATION
gehandelt, zielt völlig ins Leere: Denn nach seinem Einstieg
bei Gomopa haben die über einen Serverstandort im Ausland
verbreiteten Schmähungen nachweislich sogar zugenommen. Und
schließlich: Selbst wenn dem so wäre, wie ließe sich dann der Umstand
erklären, dass Fuchsgruber weiterhin als “Kooperationsparter”
bei Gomopa fungiert, wenn doch nun für Gomopa öffentlich
bekannt ist, dass Fuchsgruber im Auftrag der diffamierten IMMOVATION
aktiv werden sollte?
Eine unmittelbare Beendigung der Zusammenarbeit Fuchsgruber
und Gomopa wäre daher die logische Konsequenz, die jedoch
bezeichnenderweise bis heute offenkundig ausgeblieben ist, was
den von der IMMOVATION erhobenen Vorwurf weiter untermauert.
Bemerkenswert ist darüber hinaus, dass sich der Einstieg Fuchsgrubers
beim “Informationsdienst” Gomopa laut Medienberichten in
enger zeitlicher Nähe zum Scheitern Fuchsgrubers beim Deutschen
Institut für Anlegerschutz (DIAS) vollzog.“
Und im November 2010 durfte Fuchgruber dann auf der
„GoMoPa“-Webseite für sich werben:
http://www.gomopa.net/Pressemitteilungen.html?id=603&me
ldung=Wucherbeitraege-Medard-Fuchsgruber-gruendete-Aktionsgemeinschaft-
fuer-Versicherte#thumb (Noch ist der Link da)
Hintergrund:
Der Beleg, wie eng „GoMoPa“ und der laut den SJB-GoMoPa-
Opfern hinter „GoMoPa“ stehende Rechtsanwalt Resch stehen,
lesen Sie nachfolgend. Und: RA Resch fördert einen Ex-STASIHauptmann:
Zitat:
„GoMoPa: Warum haben Sie ausgerechnet einen Stasi-Oberst
und zudem noch hochbetagt, nämlich Ehrenfried Stelzer (78), als
Nachfolger von Pietsch bei DIAS eingesetzt?
Resch: “Der Verein stand ohne Geschäftsführer da. Stelzer war
der einzige, der Zeit hatte. Alle im Verein haben gesagt, 20 Jahre
nach der Wende ist die Stasizeit nicht mehr so wichtig. Schließlich
war Stelzer Professor für Kriminalistik an der Humboldt-Uni. Aber im
Nachhinein war das kein so kluger Zug.”
GoMoPa: Stelzer wurde inzwischen von Wirtschaftsdetektiv
Medard Fuchsgruber abgelöst, der nach eigenen Worten die aggressive
Verfolgung von Kapitalmarktverbrechen fortsetzen will. Der
Verein soll künftig von mehreren Rechtsanwälten bezahlt werden.“
Zitatende
Mehr unter http://www.sjb-fonds-opfer.com
Ausgrechnet der dubiose Detektiv Fuchsgruber, der die Seiten
von Immovation AG hin zu „GoMoPa“ wechelt ist also ein Resch-
Protege´.
Und: Fuchsgruber bemühte sich nachweislich um Gerlachs Archiv
in der Insolvenzmasse. Und: er hatte freien Zugang zu Heinz
Gerlachs Privaträumen.
Und: Fuchsgruber wechselte erst OFFIZIELL nach Heinz Gerlachs
für alle überraschenden Tod zu „GoMoPa“ und wurde ein
Protege´von Resch.
Und: Das Pseudonym von Klaus Maurischat „Siegfried Siewert“
ist ein Anagramm des Namen des früheren Stasi-Agenten und Dioxin
Panschers Siegfried Sievers.
Und: Die Stasi führte Menschenversuche mit Dioxin durch.
Alles Zufälle ? Rein statistisch gesehen wohl kaum.
Dazu passt, dass diese Gruppierung die Publikation dieser Fakten
mit allen Umständen verhindern will. Sie werden wissen weshalb…
Beispiel GMAC:
Laut den SJB-GoMoPa-Opfern versuchte GoMoPa wohl im
Auftrag von Resch die General Motors-Tochter GMAC zu erpressen.
Zitata aus „GoMoPa“: Der Berliner Anlegerschutzanwalt Jochen
Resch, der zahlreiche Käufer von GMAC-RFC-finanzierten Wohnungen
vertritt, sagte dem Finanznachrichtendienst GoMoPa.net: “Anfangs
wurde das Fünffache, später sogar das Siebenfache des Nettoverdienstes
eines Kreditnehmers als Kredit vergeben. Wer also
40.000 Euro netto im Jahr verdiente, bekam einen Kredit bis zu
280.000 Euro, obwohl, wie sich nach Überprüfung herausstellt, die
Immobilie nur 140.000 Euro wert war.
Dazu genügte eine Anmeldung beim Internet-Vermittler Creditweb,
und die Kredite wurden bei entsprechender Verdienstbescheinigung
im Eiltempo durchgewunken.
Was die Wohnung wirklich wert war, war nicht mehr das Problem
von GMAC-RFC . Denn sie verschnürte die Wohnungen zu Paketen
von 500 Millionen Euro und verkaufte die Pakete zur Refinanzierung
nach Holland.
Nutzniesser der Baufilligenz der GMAC-RFC waren aber nicht
die Käufer, die mit dem Kredit über dreißig Jahre eine überteuerte
Wohnung abzahlen. Nutzniesser waren die Verkäufer und Vermittler,
die 50 Prozent auf den wahren Verkehrswert der Wohnung
draufgeschlagen hatten.
Für die Vermittler von Wohnungsfinanzierungen begann ein
wahres Schlaraffenland
Anlegerschutzanwalt Resch beschreibt den Aufstieg der Ami-
Bank so: “Vertriebsorganisationen sahen die große Chance, ihren
bei anderen Banken nur schwer finanzierbaren Kunden einen Kredit
zu vermitteln. Für den Vertrieb der entscheidende Vorteil. Nur wenn
Geld fließt, fließen auch die Provisionen. Bis zu 35 Prozent des Kaufpreises.
Dieses attraktive Angebot ließ die GMAC-RFC Bank innerhalb
kurzer Zeit zu einem ernsthaften Konkurrenten für die übrigen fi-
nanzierenden Banken auf dem Schrottimmobilienmarkt aufsteigen.
Innerhalb kurzer Zeit erreichte die GMAC-RFC Bank deshalb ein
Gesamtkreditvolumen von mehr als zwei Milliarden Euro.
Der Grund für die großzügige Kreditgewährung dürfte gewesen
sein, dass die GMAC-RFC Bank das Risiko verkaufte. Sie wollte von
vornherein die Kredite nicht behalten. Sie schnürte große Kreditpakete
und verkaufte diese an holländische Zweckgesellschaften.
Die GMAC-RFC wurde schnell zum heißen Tipp auf dem Immobilienmarkt.
Denn Verkäufer und Vermittler bekamen sogar Antrag-
steller ohne Eigenkapital durch, die bei jeder anderen Bank durchgefallen
wären.”
Die GMAC-RFC Bank feierte sich in einer Pressemitteilung vom
Januar 2007 wie folgt: „Mit Einführung der neuen Baufilligenz® –
einer Produktinnovation, mit der erstmals in Deutschland standardisierte
Vollfinanzierungen für Eigennutzer und Kapitalanleger bis zu
110 Prozent des Kaufpreises angeboten werden – haben wir nicht
nur innerhalb kurzer Zeit die Produktführerschaft erreicht, sie zeichnet
auch als Wachstumstreiber für die Verdoppelung des Neugeschäftes
gegenüber 2005 verantwortlich.“
Im September 2008 war das Innovations-Konzept der GMAC
sowohl in den USA als auch in Deutschland gescheitert. Die GMACRFC
vergibt seitdem keine Hypothekendarlehen mehr.
Anlegerschutzanwalt Resch: “Zum 30. September 2008 gab die
GMAC-RFC Bank ihre Lizenz zurück. Es wurde den Kunden mitgeteilt,
dass alles beim Alten bleibe. Die GMAC-RFC Servicing GmbH
werde jetzt die Kunden weiter betreuen.
Schon damals entstanden jedoch Zweifel, ob dieses Angebot
ernst gemeint war. Wir hatten befürchtet, dass sich die Konditionen
bei der Prolongation des Darlehens verschlechtern würden.”
Die Befürchtungen bestätigt die GMAC-RFC indirekt in ihrem
Rundbrief vom 23. September 2010. Der Vorteil einer Umschuldung
auf eine andere Bank sei die Möglichkeit einer „besseren Zinskondition“.
Theoretisch dürfte die GMAC-RFC damit recht haben. Praktisch
wird es allerdings dazu führen, dass die GMAC-RFC Darlehensnehmer
bei dem Versuch einer Umschuldung bemerken werden, dass sie
wohl keine einzige Bank finden werden, die in das Risiko einsteigt.
Es wird offenbar werden, dass viele Anleger nur durch das institutionelle
Zusammenwirken zwischen Vertrieb, Verkäufer und
GMAC-RFC Bank einen Kredit bekommen hatten.
Es wird offenbar werden, dass die Hausbank des Kunden die
Umschuldung nur bei Stellung weiterer Sicherheiten vornehmen
wird.
Es wird offenbar werden, dass vielfach die Wohnung sittenwidrig
überteuert ist. Sie bringt beim Weiterverkauf nicht einmal die
Hälfte dessen, was die GMAC-RFC Bank finanziert hat.
Das einzig Gute ist, dass viele ahnungslose Anleger beim Versuch
einer Umschuldung bemerken, was ihnen seinerzeit angetan
wurde.”
GoMoPa.net schickte der GMAC-RFC Servicing GmbH folgende
Fragen:
1) Ist es richtig, dass dieses Angebot zur Umschuldung damit
zusammenhängt, dass die zur Refinanzierung an holländische
Zweckgesellschaften verkauften Kredite nur unzureichend bedient
werden und durch die Umschuldung die Rückzahlung und die
Zinszahlungen für die Anleihen der Zweckgesellschaften gesichert
werden müssen?
2) Ist es richtig, dass die GMAC-RFC Bank seit ihrem Auftreten
auf dem deutschen Immobilienmarkt im Jahr 2004 ein Gesamtvolumen
von über zwei Milliarden Euro an Krediten ausgereicht hat,
die in fünf „Paketen“ an holländische Zweckgesellschaften verkauft
wurden?
3) Ist es richtig, dass ausschließlich über das Internetportal
Creditweb Darlehensanträge bei der GMAC eingereicht werden
konnten? Wenn nein, welche weiteren Internetportale waren dazu
berechtigt?
4.) Ist es richtig, dass die mit der Creditweb kooperierenden
Vertriebe keine Originalunterlagen der Kreditsuchenden, sondern
lediglich Kopien eingereicht haben? Hat sich die GMAC-RFC Bank
seinerzeit Originale der Lohn- und Gehaltsunterlagen der Kreditnehmer
vorlegen lassen?
5.) Ist es richtig, dass in dem Baufilligenzprogramm es lediglich
auf die finanzielle Situation des Darlehensnehmers ankam und dass
Kredite bis zur Höhe des siebenfachen Jahresnettoeinkommens fi-
nanziert wurden?
6.) Ist es richtig, dass die Gewährung der Kredite auf der Grundlage
des Pfandbriefgesetzes erfolgte?
7.) Wie erfolgt der Nachweis der Aktivlegitimation der GMAC
Servicing GmbH in Fällen, in denen die Vollstreckung bei notleidenden
oder gekündigten Darlehen erforderlich wird?
GoMoPa.net ersuchte die GMAC-RFC Servicing GmbH in Wiesbaden
mehrmals, zu dem Rundbrief an die deutschen Kreditnehmer
Stellung zu beziehen. Die Geschäftsführerin Jennifer Anderson sei
in den USA, eine Telefonnummer sei nicht bekannt. Die Pressesprecherin
Katharina Dahms sei in Urlaub und hätte keine Vertretung.
Und der Prokurist Sven Klärner, der noch Auskunft geben könnte,
rief trotz mehrfacher Bitten von GoMoPa.net nicht zurück – er wird
wissen warum. „
Hintergrund:
Die SJB-GoMoPa-Opfer behaupten: „Der abgetauchte Berliner
Zweig der GoMoPa-Gangster will nun zusammen mit ihrem Hausanwalt
RA Jochen Resch, Berlin, die DKB erpressen – so wie sie dies
vorher mit Immovation versucht haben.
Estavis hat bezahlt, damit ein Grundsatzurteil gegen sie nicht
unter den Käufern ihrer Immobilien verbreitet wird. Dasselbe Spiel
versuchen der Knacki Maurischat und sein Kumpan Resch nun auch
bei der DKB durchzuziehen.
Eigengartig, da schliesst ein Finanzforum aus Deutschland mit
Briefkasten in New York einen Vertrag ab mit einem börsenkotierten
Immobilien-Unternehmen aus Berlin, der Estavis AG. Dieser
Vertrag umfasst Dienstleistungen im Marketingbereich für den Abverkauf
Denkmalgeschützter Eigentumswohnungen. Kontraktwert:
€ 100’000 ! Eine sehr eigenartig Vereinbarung.“
Börse Online: „Der Anlegeranwalt Jochen Resch kommt neuerdings
oft in den Pressemitteilungen vor, die der Finanzdienst Gomopa
ungefragt an Redaktionen verschickt. Als „Deutschlands bekannteste
Anlegerschutzkanzlei“ wird Resch Rechtsanwälte in einem
Bericht über das Ende der Noa Bankvorgestellt. Zu Schrottimmobilien
äußert sich Resch, zu einem Skandal um den Immobilienfondsanbieter
Volkssolidarität. Die Offenheit ist neu. Früher ging
Gomopa Resch hart an und konfrontierte ihn mit Vorwürfen. Doch
einige Formulierungen in einer Teilhaberinformation zur finanziellen
Situation Gomopas vom Juli 2010 legen nahe, dass der Sinneswandel
vielleicht nicht nur Zufall ist.
Gomopa, eigentlich Goldman Morgenstern & Partners Consulting
LLC mit Sitz in New York, ist seit mehr als zehn Jahren aktiv. Auf
der Website ist unter den Fachautoren der bekannte Bestsellerautor
Jürgen Roth aufgelistet. Im Handelsregister der deutschen Zweigniederlassung
ist als Geschäftszweck an erster Stelle „wirtschaftliche
Beratung, insbesondere des Mittelstandes“ aufgelistet. Dazu gehöre
„die Präsentation von Firmen im Internet und anderen Medien“. Die
Verbindung des Dienstes mit einem Nachrichtenportal im Internet
sieht Gomopa-Gründer Mark Vornkahl nicht als Problem: „Ein Interessenkonflikt
zwischen kostenpflichtiger Beratung, Informationsabonnement
und öffentlicher Aufklärung ist uns seit Bestehen nicht
untergekommen.“
Doch die Nutzer des Portals erfuhren bislang nicht, ob mit Personen
oder Organisationen, über die berichtet wurde, vertragliche
Beziehungen bestehen. Reschs Kanzlei war laut Teilhaberinformation
zeitweise eine wichtige Finanzierungsquelle von Gomopa. Darin
berichtet Gomopa-Mitgründer Klaus Maurischat, dass eine Vereinbarung
mit der Kanzlei „momentan 7500,- Euro im Monat einbringt
– rund 25 Prozent unserer monatlichen Kosten!“. Für „individuelle
Mandantenanwerbung“ stehe die Gesellschaft mit mehreren Anwaltskanzleien
in Verhandlungen.
Anwalt Resch stellt zum Inhalt der Vereinbarung klar: „Wir haben
einen einmaligen Rechercheauftrag erteilt, der im üblichen
Rahmen honoriert wird.“ Mit Mandantenbeschaffung habe das nichts
zu tun. Was Gomopa von einer Mandantenanwerbung hätte, ist
auch unklar. Denn Anwälte dürfen dafür nicht bezahlen. Auf unsere
Anfrage zu dieser und weiteren Fragen gab Vornkahl keine inhaltliche
Antwort beziehungsweise verwahrte sich gegen Zitate aus den
entsprechenden Passagen seiner E-Mail, weil er einem Mitbewerber
„keine Auskünfte zur Ausgestaltung unseres Geschäftsbetriebes
gebe.“
Ein Insider: „Was glauben Sie, wer auf die Idee kam, die
ominöse Briefkasten-Firma Goldman, Morgenstern & Partner LLC,
„GoMoPa“, einen angeblichen Zusammenschluss jüdischer Anwälte
in den USA zu gründen und wer die vielen Anwälte wie RA Albrecht
Saß, Hamburg, OLG Richter a.D. Matthias Schillo, Potsdam, und RA
Thomas Schulte, Berlin, zur Reputationsaufbesserung aufbot ?
a) RA Jochen Resch oder b) Ex-Gefängnisinsasse Klaus
Maurischat, der kaum Englisch spricht ? Und: Heinz Gerlach war
dicht dran, diese Zusammenhänge aufzuklären über den „Estavis“-
“Beratungsvertrag“. Seine Tochter, eine Rechtsanwältin in New York,
hatte bereits eine eidesstattliche Versicherung über die Brifekasetn
Firma „Goldman, Morgenstern & Partner LLC“ und deren Briefkastenadresse
in New York abgegeben und er hatte Strafanzeige wegen
der „Estavis“Beratungs-Affäre“ abgegeben. Dann wechselt auf einmal
der von Immovation zur Aufklärung von „GoMoPa“ beauftragte
„Detektiv“ Meinhard Fuchs trotz eines bereits bezahlten Honorares
von über € 60.000,- die Seiten hin zu „GoMoPa“ und Heinz Gerlach
stirbt plötzlich und für alle unerwartet angeblich an Blutvergiftung,
seltsam…“

TROTZ LANDESKRIMINALAMT-ERMITTLUNGEN EMPFIEHLT DIE KONKURS-“GoMoPa”-VERURTEILT WG ANLEGER BETRUG AM EIGENEN ANLEGER WEITER ANWÄLTE – WIE SCHLECHT GEHT ES RESCH

Liebe Leser,

laut Auskunft des Bundeskriminalamtes ermittelt das Landeskriminalamt Bayern in Sachen “GoMoPa”.

Deshalb will das BKA (noch) nicht tätig werden.

Von alldem ungerührt fährt der dubiose Dienst des mutmasslichen STASI-Mörders Oberst Stelzer und seines mutmasslichen Nachfolgers Resch samt seiner mutmasslichen Komplizen Ehlers und Bennewirtz mit ihrem trüben Treiben fort.

Wie schlecht muss es ihnen gehen ?

Ich kann  den Opfern und Heinz Friedrich nur sagen:

http://www.victims-opfer.com

Weiter so !

Herzlichst Ihr

Magister Bernd Pulch

PS: DIE OPFER WERDEN NUN WIEDER INTERPOL EINSCHALTEN !

DAS SYSTEM “GoMoPa”-Google – Opfer: “Skrupellose Internet-Täter ohne Moral vernichten unsere Existenz”

ARND HALLER “GOOGLE”-“GoMoPa”-STASI-opfer haben bei ihm keine Chance – Ein Mann ohne Moral, sagen viele betroffene Opfer

 

mehr unter

http://www.victims-opfer.com/?p=17663

 

 

10.000 Euro Belohnung für Aufklärung des STASI-Mordes

MAGISTER BERND PULCH: WIE MICH “GoMoPa” IM AUFTRAG VON MUTMASSLICH PETER EHLERS LIQUIDIEREN WILL




Liebe Besuccher,

nachstehende E-Mail erhielt ich am 9. September 2009.

Seitedem haben "GoMoPa" und ihr mutmasslicher Auftraggeber Peter Ehlers alels getan, was das STASI-Handbuch von STASI-Oberst und "GoMoPa"-Gründer Ehrenfried Stelzer vorschreibt.

Sie haben versucht mich systematisch auszuspähen und dann auszuschalten. Das heisst "liquidieren".

In der untenstehenden E-Mail dokumentieren sie, dass sie mich wirtschaftlich und gesellschaftlich vernichten wollen. 

Mittlerweile geht es auch um die physische Liquidation - ganz nach dem STASI-Handbuch und der Giftsstudie "Toxdat".

Dies werde ich öffentlich dokumentieren - mit dem zeitlichen Abstand, der nötig ist, um die Sicherheitsmassnahmen nicht zu gefährden. 

Es gibt auch Hinweise, dass "GoMoPa"-Gründer Mark Vornkahl, ein ehemaliger Polizist, der wegen zahlreicher Dienstvergehen entlassen wurde,

weiter alte STASI-Kontakte im Beamtenapparat anzuzapfen versucht. Vornkahl ist natürlich auch mehrmals vorbestraft - auch wegen betruges am eigenen Anleger.

Bei alldem handelt es sich, wie andere "GoMoPa"-Opfer bestätigen können, um eine Form der organisierten Kriminalität, die aufgrund ihrer STAsi-Wurzeln und der Symbiose 

mit mutmasslichen Cyber-Krimninellen wie Thomas Promny besonders gefährlich ist.

Herzlichst Ihr

Magister Bernd Pulch


"GoMoPa"-ERPRESSER DAVE U RANDOM "WIR WERDEN SIE WIRTSCHAFTLICH UND GESELLSCHAFTLICH ELIMINIEREN!"

MUTMASSLICH VON "GoMoPa" IM AUFTRAG VON "PETER EHLERS" ODER VON "PETER EHLERS" PERSÖNLICH

---------------------------- Original Message ----------------------------
Subject: Good morning kids fucker,
From:    "Dave U. Random" <anonymous@anonymitaet-im-inter.net>
Date:    Thu, September 9, 2010 10:58 am
To:      office@generalglobalmedia.com
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

auf unseren Informationsseiten,
befindet sich der kleine Button:
-Mail to Administrator-.
Interessant was man nicht so alles erfahren darf,
nicht wahr Herr Pulch.
Da bekommen wir doch tatsaechlich eine Email von einem
CDU Mitglied aus Ihrer Gemeinde,
der Meister Pulch auch sehr, sehr, gut kennt.
Tief besorgt ist man dort, Kinderficker,
Kinderpornohaendler und Internet Stalker in der Gemeinde.
Und auch in der katholischen Pfarrkirche,
ist man nach unserer Mitteilung tief
beunruhigt.
Das nennen wir PR-Arbeit. Aber, es kommt ja noch alles viel besser.
Unsere Briefwurfsendung und Internetinserate.
Unser Ziel: Eure gesellschaftliche und wirtschaftliche Eliminierung.
Habt einen schoenen Tag Kids fucker

Liste von 4 Internetseiten STALKER SITES DER "GoMoPa", die sich jeder Strafverfolgung entziehen.

 

An Ihren Händen klebt Blut – Cyber-Opfer enthüllen: Wie charakter-und gewissenlose Cybermörder ihre Opfer per Rufmord in den Herztod treiben wollen

Die Cybermord-Opfer Lothar Berresheim, Dipl.-Ing. Paul Bösel, Andreas Decker, Herbert Ernst, Meridian Capital, Bernd Pulch und Martin Sachs, klären über den kriminellen und serienmässig vorbestraften Ex-Gefängnissinsassen Klaus-Dieter Maurischat (Photo) Az. AZ: 28 Ls 85/05, Aktenzeichen Hamburg 035/1K/608828/2010, KRIPO Wiesbaden (ST 1044410/2010) u.v.a. und seine GoMoPa-Erpresserbande und deren Helfershelfer und Auftraggeber auf. Deren verbrecherische Aktivitäten haben den Herz-Tod des Anlegerschützers Heinz Gerlach durch eine infame Rufmord-Kampagne herbeigeführt. Zwei weitere Journalisten wurden erst kürzlich mit Herzversagen in Krankenhäuser eingeliefert werden.
Maurischat arbeitet oft im Auftrag. So auch für die SJB- sagen zumindest die sich betrogen fühlenden, gedemütigten SJB-Fondsopfer.
Nachfolgend publizieren wir eine der besten Darstellungen zum Thema Cyber-Terrorismus. Besonders pikant dabei der Bericht über die Maurischat-Festname durch das BKA.
Klaus-Dieter Maurischat hat nach Angaben von Meridian Capital bereits 23 Gerichtsurteile wegen einschlägiger Vergehen und ist im Gegensatz zu seinen Cyber-Opfern tatsächlich vorbestraft (zum Beispiel: Krefeld vom 24. April 2006; AZ: 28 Ls 85/05)
Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. London, seit Jahren im Kampf gegen den Cyber-Terrorismus aktiv, enthüllt neue kriminelle Erscheinungen im Netz
I. Sachverhalt
In der letzten Zeit taucht im Netz immer häufiger eine neue zugleich eine sehr beunruhigende Erscheinung krimineller Art auf. Professionelle Verbrechergruppen im Netz nehmen daran teil, die zu Erpressungen, Betrügereien, Erschwindeln in Bezug auf bestimmte gezielt ausgesuchte Firmen und Unternehmen fähig sind. Diese Kriminellen entwickelten neue Methoden und Mittel, sich einfach und in kurzer Zeit zu bereichern.
Strategien und Erscheinungsformen, welche diesem Prozedere zugrunde liegen, sind recht einfach.
Ein Krimineller sucht sich „sorgfältig“ im Internet spezielle Firmen und Korporationen (Opfer des Verbrechens) aus und informiert diese im nächsten Schritt darüber, dass über die Geschäftstätigkeit solcher Firmen und Korporationen in der nächsten Zeit – zuerst im Internet dann in weiteren zugänglichen Massenmedien – zahlreiche und äußerst ungünstige Informationen erscheinen.
Gleichzeitig schlagen die Kriminellen ihren künftigen Opfern – wie Magister Bernd Pulch – eine wirksame Hilfe, unnötigen Schwierigkeiten und Problemen zu entkommen, welche auf Verlust des guten Namens und Images der betroffenen Firma und Korporation abzielen. Diese Straftäter sind sich dessen bewusst, dass guter Ruf, Name und Aussehen jedes Unternehmens ein Wert in sich selbst sei. Es sei also ein Wert, wofür jedes Unternehmen bereit ist, jeglichen Preis zu zahlen. Bloß aus dem Grunde, um Schwierigkeiten und Probleme zu vermeiden, welche aus dem Verlust des guten Namens und Rufes resultieren.
Die Straftäter und ihre Opfer sind sich dessen im Klaren, dass dieser Verlust verheerende Konsequenzen zur Folge haben mag, die das Stilllegen einer bestimmten Geschäftstätigkeit erzwingen können. Dies nimmt sowohl auf Kein- als auch auf Großunternehmen Bezug. Die betrifft Firmen, die praktisch in jeder Branche und in jedem Land grenzüberschreitend tätig sind.
Das kriminelle Prozedere in Form einer Erpressung aufs Geld, eines Betrugs entwickelt sich heutzutage rasant und wird global, d.h. grenzüberschreitend und international geführt. Zu Opfer der Erpressung, des Betrugs fallen heutzutage sowohl heimisch wirkende (inländische) als auch internationale Korporationen, die großen Wert auf Erhaltung, Behalten und Pflege ihres guten Rufes dem entsprechend ihrer geschäftlichen Glaubwürdigkeit legen.
Die Kriminellen im Netz haben begriffen, dass die Pflege eines unantastbaren Rufes und Namens eines Unternehmens die einzigartige Möglichkeit auf schnelle und einfache Bereicherung bildet.
Das oben erwähnte kriminelle Vorgehen ist schwer zu verfolgen, weil es internationaler Natur ist und durch verschobene oder gar nicht existierende (fiktive) Berufs- und Justizpersonen in verschiedenen Ländern firmiert und betrieben wird.
Diese Straftäter im Netz veröffentlichen, unterbringen und verbreiten wahrheitswidrige Informationen über Ihre Opfer auf weit entlegenen Servern, welche sich nicht selten oft in exotischen Ländern befinden. Es sind diejenigen Staaten, in denen gravierende Lücken im Rechtssystem, Ermittlungs- und Verfolgungsverfahren sichtbar sind. Als Beispiel kann an dieser Stelle Indien erwähnt werden.
Mit den Verbrechern im Netz arbeiten Netzportale Führer von bekannten Blogs mit Ihrem Sitz -bewusst oder unbewusst- auch in den hoch entwickelnden Ländern zusammen. Beispielsweise können an dieser Stelle Länder wie Deutschland, Österreich, die Schweiz, die USA, Großbritannien, Spanien oder Portugal erwähnt werden.
Die unten aufgelisteten Kriminellen konnten bis heute weitgehend unbestraft handeln. Als Symptom derartigen Handelns taucht hier die Tätigkeit und „Wirksamkeit“ der Firma GOMOPAauf, welche sich über Länder wie die Bundesrepublik Deutschland, die Schweiz, Österreich, die USA, Großbritannien, Spanien und Indien erstreckt. Ein gutes Beispiel eines derartigen Handelns ist Herr Klaus Maurischat – der Anführer und „Gehirn” der Firma GOMOPA mit vielen bereits in Kraft getretenen Straftaten und Urteilen „auf seinem Konto”, der auf diese Art und Weise jahrelang seinen Unterhalt finanzierte und in der Branche nahezu unbegrenzt aktiv war (erst jüngst mutmasslich im Auftrag der SJB, Korschenbroich/Neuss).
Dieser Stand ändert sich jedoch drastisch, u.a. dank weit und breit geführten Maßnahmen der Firma Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd., welche sich gegen solche Strafdelikte im Netz richten. Auch andere Firmen und Korporationen, welche dem Verbrechen im Netz und außerhalb dieses Mediums zu Opfer gefallen sind, tragen zur Bekämpfung solcher Delikte bei.
Die Lage ändert sich auch dank wirksamen Schritten und der erfolgreichen Zusammenarbeit der Firma Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. mit der internationalen Polizei Interpol, mit der Bundesagentur (FBI) in den USA, mit der BUNDESKRIMINALPOLIZEI in Deutschland, mit SCOTLAND YARD in Großbritannien, sowie mit dem Russischen Geheimdienst FSB.
Die Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. – gemeinsam mit weiteren Firmen und Kooperationen, die zu Opfer krimineller Aktivitäten des Netzverbrechens gefallen sind – hat unbestreitbar schon erste Erfolge zu verzeichnen.
Dass im November 2008 auf dem Territorium der Bundesrepublik Deutschland der oben erwähnte Anführer und „Gehirn“ der Firma GOMOPA, Herr Klaus Maurishat festgenommen wurde, darf nicht außer Acht gelassen werden. Aus den derMeridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. zur Verfügung stehenden Informationen resultiert eindeutig, dass die nächsten Verhaftungen der an diesem Prozedere teilnehmenden Personen in solchen Ländern wie: Österreich, die Schweiz, Russland, die Ukraine, Polen, Spanien, Mexiko, Portugal, Brasilien, die USA, Kanada, Großbritannien, Irland, Australien, New Seeland und in a. erfolgen.
Das oberste Ziel der Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. sowie der weiteren Opfer des Verbrechens im Netz ist es, alle Teilnehmer dieses kriminellen Prozedere vor das zuständige Gericht zu führen.
Alle Berufs- und Justizpersonen, unabhängig vom Sitz und der ausgeübten Geschäftstätigkeit, welche dem oben beschriebenen kriminellen Vorgehen (Betrug, Erpressung) zu Opfer gefallen sind, können der von der Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. geführten Kompanie beitreten, die sich zum Ziel setzt, alle an dem an dieser Stelle dargestellten Prozedere Mitbeteiligten aus dem öffentlichen sowie dem wirtschaftlichen Leben auszuschließen.
II. Schwarze Liste mit internationalen Erpressern und Betrügern sowie Ihre Methoden (opus operandi) in den folgenden Ländern:
1. Die Bundesrepublik Deutschland
2. Dubai
3. Russland
1. Die Bundesrepublik Deutschland
GOMOPA GmbH, Goldman Morgenstern & Partners LLC., Goldman Morgenstern & Partners Consulting LLC, Wottle Inkasso Büro. In diesen Firmen sind folgende Personen recht aktiv:
– Klaus Maurischat („Vater” und „Gehirn” der kriminellen Organisation, der für den unzählige rechtskräftige Urteile zu verzeichnen sind (festgenommen in Deutschland im November 2008);
– Rudolf Josef Heckel („rechte Hand” bei Herrn Klaus Maurischat, ehemaliger denunzierter Banker, der an vielen maßlosen Bankschmuggeleien mitbeteiligt war. (Heutzutage persona non grata im deutschen Bankwesen);
– Peter Reski (zuständig für das Finanzwesen, bekannt für Betrug, Fälschungen und Steuerunterschlagungen, hinter denen bereits rechtkräftige Urteile stehen);
– Mark Vornkahl (zuständig für organisatorisch-administrative Aufgaben beiGOMOPA, ehemaliger Polizeibeamter, entlassen wegen zahlreichem Verstießen im Dienst, hat bereits ein paar rechtskräftige Urteile „auf seinem Konto“);
– Claus i Ulrike Wottle (Ehepaar, für das sogenannte „unkonventionelle” Vollstrecken der Schulden vor allem zugunsten GOMOPA. Dieser Vollstreckung lagen Erzwingung, Erpressung mit Gewalt zugrunde, die auf sowohl tatsachliche als auch fiktive Schulden Bezug nahmen?
Wie funktioniert das System von GOMOPA
Die oben in Kurze erwähnten Personen, sowie die mit dem Service GOMOPAKooperierenden, so genannte „GOMOPA-Experten“, Bloggers und alle weiteren Berufs-und Justizpersonen suchen sich aus allen möglichen Quellen Informationen über große, reichen Firmen und Korporationen aus, welche in verschiedenen heimischen und internationalen Wirtschaftszweigen tätig sind. Dem Service GOMOPA liegt besonders daran, dass man diejenigen aussucht, die „in Sich selbst ins Auge fallen”. Diejenigen Firmen und Korporationen also, gegen die relativ einfach und ohne großen Aufwand sich Vorwürfe, Unstimmigkeiten u. s. w. sich machen lassen, in bezug auf die sogar Straftaten wie Erschwindeln und Betrügen u. a. sich leicht vorführen lassen. Es ist allgemein bekannt, dass jeder Firma besonders an ihrer guten Präsenz und an ihrem unantastbaren Namen liegt. Jedes Unternehmen wird dem entsprechend alles tun, um ihre gute Präsenz also auch ihre Glaubwürdigkeit beibehalten zu können. Wenn aber zum Opfer des GOMOPA und seiner „Partner” ein großes und reiches Unternehmen fällt, so kann man sich an solchen Unternehmen schnell, einfach und sogar beachtlich bereichern.
Es taucht an dieser Stelle die Frage auf:
Welcher schlaue Straftäter, der im Netz und außerhalb des Netzes mir Erfolg wirkt, möchte daraus kein Nutzen ziehen?
Die Kriminellen im Netz wissen genau, dass ohne geschäftliche Glaubwürdigkeit kein Vertrauen vorhanden sei, welches jeder Geschäftstätigkeit unentbehrlich ist. GOMOPAsowie alle mit dem Kooperierenden haben mit Sicherheit alle möglichen Methoden und Maßnahmen beherrscht, wie man Glaubwürdigkeit und Vertrauen einer Firma, eines Unternehmens, einer Korporation (Verbrechensopfer) in Frage stellt.
Dies zieht eben die Aufmerksamkeit der User an, so dass die Homepage des GOMOPAwww.gomopa.net in den Suchmaschinen wie Google, Yahoo leicht auffindbar ist. Dies wiederum bedeutet nichts anderes als Zusatzprofite für das Service GOMOPA , weil um seine Tätigkeit herum ein mediales Diskurs geschaffen wird.
Ein auf den ersten Blick banales und einfaches Opfer der Erpressung kann beispielsweise eine öffentliche, staatliche Instanz, welche auf Basis der öffentlichen Glaubwürdigkeit funktioniert, werden, wie eine Bank oder ein bankfremdes Finanzinstitut. So war es eben mit dem bankfremden, internationalen FinanzinstitutMeridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. der Fall.
Ein einfaches und leichtes Opfer de illegalen und materiellen Gewinns können auch die Versicherungsgesellschaften werden, bei denen – wie es aus unseren Recherchen resultiert-, vieles auf die kriminelle Tätigkeit des GOMOPA vor allem auf dem Gebiet der Bundesrepublik Deutschland, der Schweiz und Österreich zurückzuführen sei. Unter den bekannten und erkennbaren Opfern sind mit Sicherheit deutsche, österreichische und schweizerische Banken, Versicherungsgesellschaften wie z.B. Allianz aus Deutschland, deutsche und österreichische Firmen wie HDI und DKV sichtbar.
Dies, wozu sich das Service GOMOPA traut und was die mit dem kooperierenden Services, Blogs heutzutage praktizieren, ist das so genannte Cyber-Stalking, welches sich rasant im Netz verbreitet. Die kriminelle Methode besteht an dieser Stelle u. a. im Bedrohen, dass über die Geschäftstätigkeit eines Unternehmens (Ofer der Erpressung, Erzwingung und Bedrohung) fiktive, gar nicht existierende Informationen (Lügen, Gerüchte, Geschichtchen, Nachrede, Beleidigungen) zuerst im Netz dann in anderen Massenmedien veröffentlicht werden. Dies dient lediglich dazu, um ein potenzielles Opfer dazu zu bewegen, eine beachtliche Geldsumme für die so genannte „Ruhe“ dem Erpresser bereitzustellen. Die „Ruhe” bedeutet hier das Versprechen einer Zugangssperre in Bezug auf die Veröffentlichung jeglicher fiktiven Information im Netz und in allen weiteren Massenmedien, die die Opfer der Erpressung im äußerst negativen Licht darstellen kann.
Derartige Bedrohungen setzen sich, wie bereits oben erwähnt zum Ziel, Firmen – potenzielle Opfer des Cyber-Stalking dazu zu veranlassen, dass sie sich selbst „aufkaufen“. Kurz gesagt, GOMOPA und seinesgleichen, sowie die mit denen kooperierenden Services und Blogs, kreieren eine „virtuelle Wirklichkeit”, oder anders gesagt, publizieren fiktive Informationen über potenzielle Opfer eines Verbrechens. Firmen und Korporationen, welche gegen Bedrohung und Erpressung seitens GOMOPAnicht fällig sind, diejenigen also, welche für so genannte „Ruhe“ nicht zahlen wollen, werden zum Opfern schwerwiegender Lügen, Beleidigungen, Insinuationen und anderer krimineller Unterschlagungen, die Aussehen und Präsenz einer Firma mit Sicherheit beeinträchtigen.
Eines gilt als Ziel des GOMOPA, nämlich so schnell und so einfach, wie es geht, das Geld abzukassieren, und wenn sich eine Firma weigert und sich die „Ruhe“ nicht kaufen möchte, wird sie unerwartet und blitzschnell zum Objekt der Erpressung und Beleidigung im Netz.
An dieser Stelle taucht folgende Frage auf: Wie ist es möglich, dass der Anführer der Firma GOMOPA, Herr Klaus Maurischat, der nur in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland auf seinem „Konto” 23 Gerichtsurteile hat, sich jahrelang als einen ehrlichen Bürger kreieren, zugleich anderen Personen, Firmen, Korporationen verbrecherische Taten, Delikte einprägen, dazu noch daran beachtliche Geldsummen verdienen konnte? Dieses komplexe Prozedere kann nur folgendermaßen erklärt werden:
GOMOPA kreiert sein Aussehen, seine Präsenz in den Augen der öffentlichen Meinung als ein ehrliches Subjekt, welches gegen pathologische Erscheinungen des öffentlichen und wirtschaftlichen Alltags einschreitet. GOMOPA und seine Partner (Services, Blogs) stellen sich als Verfolger jeglicher Verbrechensart dar, versprechen also den Kampf gegen jeden virtuellen Verbrecher im Netz (insbesondere gegen jeden Betrüger, Erpresser). GOMOPA verwendet in dieser Hinsicht eine Art „Merketingsvorhang” als Methode der Verführung, infolge dessen es sein wahres „Antlitz“ und seine wahren Intentionen als die eines Betrügers und Erpressers aufs Geld verbergen kann. Die wahren Absichten des GOMOPA, der mit GOMOPA zusammen arbeitenden Services und Blogs konnten bis heute zweifelsohne mit Erfolg vor der öffentlichen Meinung versteckt bleiben, vor allem dank des so genannten „Rauchvorhangs“, welcher sich darin widerspiegelt, dass man sich selbst als „Sieger“ jeglichen Missbrauchs und jeder pathologischen Erscheinung des öffentlichen und wirtschaftlichen Lebens in Deutschaland, Österreich, der Schweiz, den USA, Großbritannien, Russland, Spanien kreiert.
Als nächstes taucht die von dem GOMOPA vorgeschobene Person auf, welche Firmen und Korporationen – die künftigen Opfer des Verbrechens also – vor der Möglichkeit der Veröffentlichung von äußerst ungünstigen und das betroffene Unternehmen in einem negativen Licht darstellenden Informationen im Internet und in weiteren Massenmedien warnt. Die Person, von der hier die Rede ist, informiert zugleich, dass sie sich mit Erfolg gegen so ein Prozedere für ein entsprechendes „Honorar“ einsetzen kann. Der GOMOPA geht es an dieser Stelle um die Erpressung aufs Geld für so genannte „Ruhe” um die Firma und Korporation (Opfer eines Verbrechens) herum. Meistens wird seitens der betroffenen Firmen auf solche Bedrohungen überhaupt nicht reagiert, weil sie zu ihrem Alltag und ihrer Tagesordnung gehören. Es fehlt schließlich kaum an Erpressern im Netz und außerhalb des Mediums. Normalerweise kommt es also selten zu so genannter „Verständigung”, wobei auf der einen Seite die Verbrechensopfer, auf der anderen Seite das GOMOPA auftritt. Es ist verständlich, dass der Preis für so eine „Verständigung” die Bereitstellung der von dem GOMOPA geforderten Gelder wäre. Die finanzielle Erpressung wird in dieser Etappe selten vollzogen. Die Lage ändert sich jedoch kaum, wenn die Firmen und Korporationen (Verbrechensopfer) erfahren, dass die Bedrohung erfüllt sei. In Kurze erscheinen auf der Homepage http://www.gomopa.netzahlreiche Presseartikel, Schein-berichte und Pseudomarktanalysen, die sowohl durchGOMOPA als auch durch so genannte „unabhängige Experten“ firmiert und vertreten werden, die mit GOMOPA formal oder fiktiv zusammenarbeiten. Informationen, hier publiziert, entsprechen den Inhalten aus einer Bedrohung und stellen die Geschäftstätigkeit der Personen, Firmen und Korporationen in einem äußerst negativen Licht dar.
Es unterliegt keinem Zweifel, dass derartige Maßnahmen und Methoden bloß auf Beeinträchtigung des guten Namens und der guten Präsenz dieser Firmen und Korporationen abzielen.
Die Tätigkeit von GOMOPA ist damit mit Sicherheit nicht ausgeschöpft. GOMOPAverbreitet (publiziert, unterbringt) die oben dargestellten Informationen im Netz, indem es sich der glaubwürdigen, populären und meinungsbildenden Services bedient. Mehr noch, GOMOPA droht den Firmen und Korporationen (seinen Opfern), dass die „aus dem Finger gezogenen“ Informationen nicht nur im Netz, sondern auch im Fernsehen und im Radio und in der Presselandschaft erscheinen.
Wie die Erfahrung und das bisherige Fachwissen der Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. zeigen, sind sich die Services meistens nicht dessen bewusst, dass sie zum Zwecke eines kriminellen Vorgehens durch das GOMOPA genutzt werden. Sie stimmen dem entsprechend mit den fiktiven Publikationen, Berichten und Analysen überein, welche speziell durch GOMOPA sowie durch „unabhängige“ Experten präpariert sind.
Es kommt auch vor, dass die Services und Blogs einer derartigen Zusammenarbeit mit dem GOMOPA Zustimmung erteilen, wobei sie genau wissen, dass die von GOMOPAübermittelten Informationen fiktiv sind und die Glaubwürdigkeit der Firmen und Korporationen beeinträchtigen. Sie nehmen also bewusst an dem kriminellen Prozedere teil. Die Erklärung dieser Lage ist recht einfach. GOMOPA zahlt nämlich den Services und Blogs entsprechende Vergütung, dass sie der Veröffentlichung von unwahren Informationen über die Firmen und Korporationen (Verbrechensopfer) zustimmen.
Einige Services und Blogs scheinen nichts davon gewusst zu haben, dass die auf ihren Seiten zur Verfügung gestellten Informationen „fiktiv“ und „aus dem Finger gezogen“ sind. Sie suchen auf diese Art und Weise ihre Verhaltensweise zu rechtfertigen, denn sie wollen den rechtlichen Konsequenzen wegen der Teilnahme am Missbrauch des guten Namens und Aussehens einer Firma oder Korporation entkommen.
Das Tätigkeitssystem von GOMOPA, von zusammenarbeitenden Services und Blogs wurde auch am Beispiel der Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. ausgetestet.
Anfang Oktober 2008 erhielt einer der Arbeiter der Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. eine Meldung von einem anonymen Sender, dass in naher Zukunft – zuerst im Internet, dann im Fernsehen, im Radio und in der deutschen Presse – Informationen erscheinen, die die Funktionsweise und Tätigkeiten der Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. in einem äußerst negativen Licht darstellen. Der Mitarbeiter derMeridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. wurde also informiert, dass diese Meldungen/Nachrichten zweifelsohne deutlich das Aussehen und den guten Ruf der Firma Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. beeinträchtigen.
Der an dieser Stelle erwähnte „Gesprächspartner” hat den Angestellten der Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. informiert, dass die Möglichkeit besteht die peinliche Situation zu vermeiden, indem die Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. auf das von der Person gezeigte Konto die Summe von 100.000,00 EUR überweist. Wie sich aber später zeigte, war der Herr Klaus Maurischat – dieser anonyme Gesprächspartner – „Gehirn“ und „Lider desGOMOPA“. Die Ermittlungen wurden angestellt durch die Bundeskriminalpolizei(Verfolgungs- und Ermittlungsorgan auf der Bundesebene) während des Ermittlungsverfahrens wegen einer finanziellen Erpressung, Betrügereien auch wegen der Bedrohungen, welche von Herrn Maurischat und seinen Mitarbeiter praktiziert wurden und werden sowie wegen Teilnahme anderer (Leiter der Internetservices und Moderatoren der Blogs) an diesem Prozedere. Diese Straftaten wurden begangen zu Schaden vieler Berufs- und Justizpersonen, darunter auch der Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. Die Opfer dieses Verbrechens sind in Deutschland, Österreich, der Schweiz, Spanien, Portugal, Großbritannien, den USA und Kanada sichtbar.
In diesem Moment taucht folgende Frage auf: Wie war die Reaktion der Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. auf die Forderungen seitens GOMOPA? Entsprach die Reaktion den Erwartungen von GOMOPA? Hat die Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. die geforderte Summe 100.000,00 EUR überwiesen?
Seites der Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. gab es überhaupt keine Reaktion auf den Erpressungsversuch von GOMOPA. Ende August 2008 auf dem Service http://www.gompa.net sind zahlreiche Artikel/Meldungen erscheinen, welche die Tätigkeit derMeridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. in einem sehr negativen Licht dargestellt haben. Nachdem die auf http://www.gomopa.net enthaltenen Informationen ausführlich und vollständig analysiert worden waren, ergab es sich, dass sie der Wahrheit nicht einmal in einem Punkt entsprechen und potenzielle und bereits bestehende Kunden derMeridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. in Bezug auf die von diesem Finanzinstitut geführten Geschäftstätigkeit irreführen. Infolge der kriminellen Handlugen von GOMOPA und der mit ihm kooperierenden Services und Blogs im Netz hat die Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. beachtliche und messbare geschäftliche Verluste erlitten. Die Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. hat nämlich in erster Linie eine wichtige Gruppe von potenziellen Kunden verloren. Was sich aber als wichtiger erwies, es haben sich die bisherigen Kunden von der Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. kaum abgewandt. Diejenigen Kunden haben unsere Dienstleitungen weiterhin genutzt und nutzen diese immer noch. In Hinblick auf die bisherige Zusammenarbeit mit der Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd., werden ihrerseits dem entsprechend keine Einwände erhoben .
GOMOPA hat so einen Verlauf der Ereignisse genau prognostiziert, dessen Ziel beachtliche und messbare geschäftliche durch die Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.erlittene Verluste waren. Der Verlauf der Ereignisse hat GOMOPA mit Sicherheit gefreut. GOMOPA hat nämlich darmit gerechnet, dass die Markt-Stellung derMeridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. nachlässt und das Finanzinstitut die geforderte Summe (100.000,00 EUR) bereitstellt. Im Laufe der Zeit, als das ganze Prozedere im Netz immer populärer war, versuchte GOMOPA noch vier mal zu der Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. Kontakte aufzunehmen, indem es jedes mal das Einstellen dieser kriminellen „Kampagne” versprochen hat, wobei es jedes mal seine finanziellen Forderungen heraufsetzte. Die letzte für das Einstellen der „Kampagne“ gegen dieMeridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. vorgesehene Quote betrug sogar 5.000.000,00 EUR (in Worten: fünf Milionen EURO). Die Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.konnte sich aber trotz der sich ständig steigenden Forderungen seitens GOMOPA im Markt behaupten.
Im Oktober 2008 traf die Leitung der Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.Entscheidung über die Benachrichtigung der Internationalen Polizei INTERPOL sowie entsprechender Strafverfolgungsorgane der BRD (die Polizei und die Staatsanwaltschaft) über den bestehenden Sachverhalt. In der Zwischenzeit meldeten sich bei der Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. zahlreiche Firmen und Korporationen, sogar Berufsperson wie Ärzte, Richter, Priester, Schauspieler und anderen Personen aus unterschiedlichen Ländern der Welt, die der Erpressung von GOMOPA nachgegeben und die geforderten Geldsummen überwiesen haben. Diese Personen gaben bereits Erklärungen ab, dass sie dies getan haben, damit man sie bloß endlich „in Ruhe lässt” und um unnötige Probleme, Schwierigkeiten und einen kaum begründbaren Ausklang vermeiden zu können. Die Opfer dieses kriminellen Vorgehens haben die Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. über unterschiedliche Geldsummen, welche verlangt wurden, informiert.
In einem Fall gab es verhältnismäßig kleine (um ein paar tausend EURO), in einem anderen Fall handelte es schon um beachtliche Summen (rund um paar Millionen EURO).
Zusätzlich wendeten sich an die Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. Firmen, welche der GOMOPA noch keine „Gebühr” überweisen haben und bereits überlegen, ob sie dies tun sollen, oder nicht. Diese Firmen erwarteten von der Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. eine klare Stellungnahme sowie eine professionelle praktische Beratung, wie man sich in solch einer Lage verhalten soll und wie man diese Geldforderungen umgehen kann. Die Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. hat ausnahmslos allen Verbrechensopfern, welche sich bei unserer Firma gemeldet haben, eine Zusammenarbeit vorgeschlagen. Als oberste Aufgabe stellt sich diese Kooperation, gemeinsam entschlossene und wirksame Maßnahmen gegen GOMOPA, gegen andere Services im Netz sowie gegen alle Bloggers zu treffen, die an dem hier beschriebenen internationalen kriminellen Vorgehen mit GOMOPA-Führung teilnehmen.
Alle diese Firmen traten einem so genannten von der Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. vorgeschlagenen „Kreuzzug” gegen GOMOPA, seine Partner bei. Auf unsere Bitte benachrichtigten alle mitbeteiligten Firmen die Internationale Polizei INTERPOL sowie ihre heimischen Verfolgungsorgane, u. a. die zuständige Staatsanwaltschaft und die Polizeibehörden über den bestehenden Sachverhalt.
In Hinblick auf die Tatsache, dass das verbrecherische Handeln von GOMOPA sich über viele Staaten erstreckte und dass die Anzahl der in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland erstatteten Anzeigen wegen der durch GOMOPA, Internetservices und Bloggers begangenen Straftaten, rasant wuchs – was zweifelsohne von einer weit gehenden kriminellen Wirkungskraft des GOMOPA zeugt – schlug die Internationale Wirtschaftspolizei INTERPOL der Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. vor, dass sich ihr Vertreter in Berlin mit dem Vertreter von GOMOPA trifft, um die „Zahlungsmodalitäten“ und Überweisung der Summe von 5.000.000,00 EUR zu besprechen. Dieser Schritt sollte, eine gut durchdachte und durch dieBundeskriminalpolizei organisierte Falle durchzuführen, deren Ziel die Festnahme der unter GOMOPA wirkenden internationalen Straftäter war.
Die koordinierten Schritte und Maßnahmen der Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.und anderer Beschädigter, geleitet von der Internationalen Wirtschaftspolizei INTERPOL, dem Bundeskriminalamt und der Staatsanwaltschaft der Bundesrepublik Deutschland haben zur Aus-, Einarbeitung und Durchführung der oben beschriebenen Falle beigetragen. Im November 2008 führte die in Berlin vorbereitete Falle zur Festnahme und Verhaftung des Vertreters des GOMOPA, der nach der Festnahme auf Herrn Klaus Maurichat – als den Hauptverantwortlichen und Anführer der internationalen kriminellen Gruppe GOMOPA verwies. Der Festgenommene benannte und zeigte der Bundeskriminalpolizei zugleich den aktuellen Aufenthaltsort des Herrn Klaus Maurischat. „Gehirn“ und Gründer dieser internationalen kriminellen Gruppe GOMOPA. Herr Klaus Maurischat wurde am selben Tag auch festgenommen und auf Frist verhaftet, wird bald in Anklagezustand gestellt, wird die Verantwortung für eigene Straftaten und die des Forums GOMOPA vor einem zuständigen Bundesgericht tragen. Die Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. unternahm bereits alle möglichen Schritte, damit Herr Klaus Maurischat auch auf der Anklagebank des zuständigen Gerichts des Vereinigten Königsreiches Großbritannien erscheint. Unter den beschädigten Berufs- und Justizpersonen aus Großbritannien, neben der Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. gibt es noch viele Opfer von GOMOPA:
Der Begin der Verhaftungen mit so einem Ausmaß bedeutet für die deutsche Justiz einen ausschlaggebenden und bahnbrechenden Punkt. Bemerkenswert ist, dass die Verfolgungsorgane der Bundesrepublik sich bis zu diesem Zeitpunkt der langjährigen kriminellen Tätigkeit des Herrn Klaus Maurischat und seiner Mitarbeiter machtlos zeigten.
Die langdauernde Straflosigkeit des kriminellen Vorgehens des Herrn Klaus Maurischat, der jahrelang die „Erste Geige” bei GOMOPA spielte, ist zu Ende gegangen.
An dieser Stelle taucht noch eine Frage auf: wie wird’s weiter gehen?
Die Festnahme des Herrn Klaus Maurischat ist ein ausschlaggebender Moment, anders gesagt eine „Wende um 180 Grad” für ihn persönlich. Es bedeutet aber auch den „Anfang vom Ende“ für seine Mitarbeiter, für die Internetservices, Bloggers, die mit GOMOPA so gerne und ohne Widerspruch zusammengearbeitet hatten. Es unterliegt keinem Zweifel, dass die Sache vom Herrn Klaus Maurischat an der Spitze des „Eisbergs” steht. Der oben erwähnte Wendepunkt zu dieser Frage wird weitere Festnahmen und Verhaftungen der GOMOPA-Mitglieder mit sich bringen, sowie aller Personen aus allen möglichen Gebieten, die an diesem grenzüberschreitenden kriminellen Vorgehen teilgenommen haben.
Aus Informationen, welche der Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. vorliegen, resultiert, dass die nächsten Festnahmen aktuell vorbreitet werden, die mit dem Services GOMOPA zusammenarbeitende Personen betreffen. Dies wird auf Personen außerhalb Deutschland – von wo der Herr Klaus Maurischat kommt – bezug nehmen. Die Einzelheiten dürfen an dieser Stelle in Hinblick auf Rechtsgut und Verlauf der durch die Verfolgungsorgane der BRG und der INTERPOL geführten Untersuchung leider nicht verraten werden.
Die Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. kann momentan lediglich eine verbindliche Information aus der geführten Untersuchung der Öffentlichkeit bekannt geben, die die strafrechtliche Haftung nicht zu Folge haben wird.
In diesem Moment also werden intensive Vorbereitungen auf Verhaftung einer Reihe von Personen außerhalb der Bundesrepublik Deutschland getroffen.
Dies betrifft insbesondere folgende Länder wie:
– Russische Föderation
– die Ukraine
– Polen
– Spanien
– Mexiko
– Portugal
– Brasilien
– die Vereinigten Staaten von Amerika
– Kanada
– Großbritannien
– Irland
– Australien
– New Seeland
– Indien.
Alle Berufs- und Justizpersonen, unabhängig vom Land, in dem sie das Amt begleiten, oder dessen Bürger sind, und die bis jetzt bewusst oder unbewusst mit dem Forum GOMOPA zusammengearbeitet haben, oder weiterhin zusammenarbeiten, erregen den Verdacht der Internationalen Polizei INTERPOL. Diese Polizei arbeitet mit der Kriminalpolizei in jedem Land, um die oben erwähnten Personen zuerst identifizieren und dann die juristisch verfolgen zu können.
Informationen zu diesem Thema, sowie über Anfang und Ende der Tätigkeit des GOMOPA kann man unter folgenden Adressen im Netz lesen:
http://antigomopa.net/de/
http://gomopaabzocker.wordpress.com/
http://www.nepper-schlepper-bauernfaenger.com
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qNpzAu-QMuE
http://www.korte.de/alexander/2006/01/gomopa-finanforum-kritik.html
http://evelux.de/gomopa-sam-240/
http://blog.deobald.org/archive/2007/07/01/betrugsvorwurf-gomopa-spam/
2. Dubai
KLP Group Emirates – Vereinigte Arabische Emiraten. Als Chef der Firma gilt HerrMartin Kraeter, der nicht nur als „Gehirn” des ganzen Unternehmens, sondern auch als langjähriger Freund des Herrn Klaus Maurischat (GOMOPA-Leiter) fungiert.
Diese Firma will nicht einmal verbergen und gibt offiziell zu, dass sie als strategischer Partner des GOMOPA auf dem Gebiet des Nahen Ostens, dem entsprechend das Gebiet der Persischen Küste tätig ist.
Die offizielle Tätigkeit der Firma KLP Group Emirates umfasst unter anderem folgende Bereiche: Finanzberatung auch aus dem Off-Shore Bereich (Management Services – Facilitators – OffshoreConsultants, International Tax & Legal Consultants – Fiduciaries). Im Tätigkeitsbereich der Firma kommt auch die Gründung von Firmen und Unternehmen in den so genannten „Steuerparadiesen” vor, um der Steuerpflicht zu entfliehen.
Die inoffizielle Tätigkeit der Firma KLP Group Emirates umfasst unter anderem die Zusammenarbeit mit dem Service GOMOPA im Bereich der „Geldwäsche”. Die Gelder werden infolge der kriminellen Handlungen durch GOMOPA generiert, durch vorgeschobene Berufs- und Justizpersonen demnächst über die ganze Welt verbreitet und legalisiert.
Die auf die Gesetzwidrigkeit beruhende Tätigkeit der Firma KLP Group Emirates sowie die Kooperation mit dem Services GOMOPA erregten Aufmerksamkeit auch bei den Verfolgungsorganen des Vereinigten Königreiches Großbritannien, vor allem bei Scotland Yard, das zu dieser Frage ein intensives Ermittlungsverfahren eingeleitet hat, welches sich in der „Entwicklungsphase“ befindet. Es muss angemerkt werden, dass alle Berufs- und Justizpersonen, vor allem aber die Kunden der Firma KLP Group Emirates, die mit der Firma KLP Group Emirates in Vergangenheit zusammengearbeitet haben und dies immer noch tun, unter die „Luppe“ des Scotland Yard genommen werden.
3. Russland
a) Die Firma E-xecutive wird von dem Herrn Vilen Novosartow geleitet. Die auf der Homepage der Firma enthaltenen Informationen kommen direkt von der FirmaGOMOPA. Die Firma E-xecutive führt die enge Zusammenarbeit nicht nur mitGOMOPA, sondern auch mit einer weiteren auf dem russischen Gebiet unter dem Namen OOO VK Broker funktionierenden Firma. Die Firma E-xecutive im Zusammenhang mit der Firma OOO VK Broker ist Mitglied einer kriminellen Gruppe unter der Leitung von GOMOPA. Die Firma E-xecutive vertritt Interessen von GOMOPA in Russland und in Mittel- und Osteuropa.
Inoffiziell beschäftigt sich die Firma E-xecutive insbesondere mit der Suche nach potenziellen „Opfern” des Erschwindelns, der Erpressung und Erzwingung der Gelder für GOMOPA von Firmen und Korporationen aus dem Gebieten Russland, Ukraine, sowie aus allen Staaten in Mittel-Osteuropa.
Offiziell führt die Firma E-xecutive eine dem Forum GOMOPA ähnliche Gewerbetätigkeit.
b) OOO «VK Broker». Leiter der Firma ist der Herr Pavel Kokarev. Diese Firma verheimlicht es nicht, dass sie mit dem Forum GOMOPA zusammenarbeitet. Die FirmaOOO VK Broker vertritt GOMOPA in Mittel-Osteuropa, auch in Russland. Sie übt offiziell auf diesem Gebiet dem GOMOPA ähnliche Tätigkeit aus, inoffiziell aber ist sie mit der Suche nach potenziellen „Opfern“ der Erpressung, des Betrugs und des Erschwindelns für GOMOPA beschäftigt. Die Firma blieb bis jetzt von jeder Strafe verschont, konnte mit „ewiger Straflosigkeit” wegen eines schlecht ausgearbeiteten, korrupten Rechtswesens in Russland rechnen. Die Situation kann sich jedoch ändern, nachdem Herr Klaus Maurischat in Berlin festgenommen und verhaftet worden ist. Dieser ständige Straftäter, der „auf seinem Konto” eine Reihe von rechtskräftigen Urteilen hat, der bis jetzt seine Freiheit unbegrenzt genossen hat, dementsprechend nicht weiß, was es bedeutet verhaftet zu werden, beginnt nach und nach laut uns zur Verfügung stehenden Angaben endlich „sein Zeugnis abzulegen“. Dies ist verständlich, wenn man die ihm drohende hohe Strafe berücksichtigt. Dieser Delinquent zeigt dabei immer größeres Interesse an der Zusammenarbeit mit den deutschen Verfolgungs- und Ermittlungsorganen. Es besteht also die Chance, dass er weitere Personen der Öffentlichkeit enthüllt, indem er auf Minderung der Gefängnisstrafe rechnet. Es ist auch nur die Frage der Zeit, wann INTERPOL in Zusammenarbeit mit der Russischen (FSB) der Firma OOO VK Broker „an die Tür klopft”, welche durch den Herrn Pavl Kokarev geführt und vertreten wird.
Die Firma OOO VK Broker besitzt ein virtuelles Buero im REGUS-Gebäude in Moskau, stellt nicht einmal eine Person an und bildet eine typische Ein-Person-Firma, die alle geschäftlichen „Delikte“ firmieren kann, wobei sie keine zivil-rechtliche Haftung trägt. Der Herr Pavel Kokarev scheint „vergessen zu haben” oder besitzt kein ausreichendes Wissen für seine eventuelle Verantwortung fier die Teilnahme an den internationalen Verbrechen unter Leitung von GOMOPA.

DUBIOS ! DER SPIEGEL ÜBER DIE “GELIEBTEN GENOSSEN”:STASI, – OBERST EHRENFRIED STELZER u. RA RESCH

http://www.spiegel.de/spiegel/print/d-65717414.html

http://www.spiegel.de/spiegel/print/d-13502488.html

 

BÖRSE ONLINE ÜBER DIE SERIENKRIMINELLEN DER “GoMoPa” UND DEREN PARTNER

BoerseOnline_Nr38_16.09.2010_Wo_gehobelt_wird

BETREFF: LKA BAYERN ERMITTELT GEGEN “GoMoPa” UND DEREN KRIMINELLE PARTNER

Liebe Mit-Opfer,

zuständig ist Oberstaatsanwalt Anton E. Winkler bei der Staatsanwaltschaft München:

Staatsanwaltschaft München I

Linprunstraße 25

80335 München

Telefon: 089 / 5597-07

Fax: 089 / 5597-4131

E-Mail: poststelle@sta-m1.bayern.de

Internet: www.justiz.bayern.de/sta/sta/m1/

LG

H.K-W.

München

FINANCIAL TIMES ÜBER DIE SERIENBETRÜGER DER “GoMoPa”, IHRE PARTNER, UND IHRE ERPESSUNGEN IN DER FINANZBRANCHE

SZ_03.09.2010_Am_virtuellen_Pranger

Buchtip: Der Mielke- Konzern. Die Geschichte der Stasi 1945 – 1990.

von Jens Gieseke

Kategorie: DDR & Vereinigung
ISBN: 3421054819

Kommentar abgeben
Aus der Amazon.de-Redaktion
Er galt als einer der bestorganisierten Geheimdienste der Welt, doch mit dem Sturz der SED-Herrschaft brach der gefürchtete Staatssicherheitsdienst der DDR zusammen wie ein Kartenhaus.

Warum, das ist vielen bis heute ein Rätsel. Schon zu DDR-Zeiten eilte der Stasi der Ruf allwissender Omnipräsenz voraus, und daran hat sich in den vergangenen zehn Jahren, aller wissenschaftlichen Aufarbeitung zum Trotz, wenig geändert. Eher im Gegenteil. Mit Blick auf den Westen sprechen einige besonders eifrige Apologeten des Stasi-Mythos gar schon von einer “unterwanderten Republik” und fordern, die Geschichte der Bundesrepublik umzuschreiben, da “die Stasi immer mit dabei gewesen” sei. Folgt man jedoch den Befunden, die der Berliner Historiker Jens Gieseke in seiner prägnanten Studie zum Mielke-Konzer ausbreitet, wird das kaum erforderlich sein. Zumindest, so weit man das nach Auswertung der Stasiakten sagen kann. Welche Geheimnisse noch in den Archiven des KGB und anderer Dienste schlummern, wagt zurzeit niemand vorherzusagen.

In einem wohltuend sachlichen, unaufgeregten Stil, widmet sich Jens Gieseke der Geschichte des Ministeriums für Staatssicherheit. Von den frühen Anfängen in der SBZ/DDR, über die Aufbauphase Anfang der 50er-Jahre, als die “rote Gestapo” mit brutaler Effizienz jedwede Opposition gegen die Sowjetisierung der DDR-Gesellschaft unterdrückte, bis hin zur Phase einer “immerwährenden tschekistischen Prosperität”, die 1957 mit dem Amtsantritt Erich Mielkes begann und jenen aufgeblähten Apparat hervorbrachte, der selbst im Vergleich zum KGB eine Spitzenstellung einnahm: Auf 180 DDR-Bürger kam — statistisch gesehen — ein hauptamtlicher MfS-Mitarbeiter. In der ungleich größeren UdSSR lag die Überwachungsdichte bei 600 Bürgern pro Mitarbeiter. So entstand der “wohl größte geheimpolizeiliche und geheimdienstliche Apparat der Weltgeschichte”; logische Konsequenz von Mielkes Spitzel-Philosophie: “Wir müssen alles erfahren! Es darf an uns nichts vorbeigehen.”

Jens Gieseke schildert das gigantische System der Bespitzelung und Unterdrückung durch das MfS und seine enge Verflechtung mit allen Lebensbereichen der DDR-Gesellschaft. Sein Buch stellt damit einen wichtigen Beitrag zu einem zentralen Kapitel deutscher Geschichte dar und dürfte erheblich zur Versachlichung einer emotionsgeladenen Debatte beitragen. –Stephan Fingerle

Kurzbeschreibung
Einer der profundesten Kenner der Stasi-Akten liefert die erste knappe Bilanz der ebenso grausigen wie miefigen Welt des DDR-Geheimdienstes, des, im Verhältnis zur Bevölkerungszahl, größten geheimen Sicherheitsapparates der Welt.
Das Ministerium für Staatssicherheit der DDR war nicht nur gefürchtete Geheimpolizei und effektiver Spionagedienst, sondern entwickelte sich zu einem weitläufigen “Gemischtwarenkonzern” in Sachen Sicherheit, Überwachung und…


Siehe auch:

DDR & Vereinigung > Mielke- Konzern. Die Geschichte der Stasi 1945 – 1990.

DIE UNTERWANDERTE REPUBLIK- STASI IM WESTEN

Der Berliner Historiker und Mitarbeiter der Gauck-Behörde Hubertus Knabe entlarvt in seinem Buch Die unterwanderte Republikdie Machenschaften des DDR-Geheimdienstes im Westen Deutschlands. Die von ihm präsentierten Verratsfälle zeigen exemplarisch, wie groß das Ausmaß der geheimdienstlichen Durchdringung der alten Bundesrepublik wirklich war, und werfen erneut die Frage auf, in welchem Maße politische Entscheidungen und Entwicklungen von der Stasi beeinflusst werden konnten.Gestützt auf reichhaltiges Quellenmaterial gelingt es dem Autor, das Wirken des MfS “transparent” zu machen. Weite Bereiche der bundesdeutschen Gesellschaft wurden von der Stasi unterwandert. Ihre “Quellen” in Politik, Militär, Wirtschaft, Medien oder Wissenschaft sorgten für einen ständigen Informationsfluss. “Die Stasi war als konspirative Kraft immer dabei”, diagnostiziert Knabe, und ein dichtes Netz von über 20.000 Informellen Mitarbeitern sorgte dafür, dass der Mielke-Truppe nur wenig entging.Doch der Stasi ging es nicht um bloße Informationsbeschaffung. Ihre Agenten “übten politischen Einfluss aus, lancierten Desinformationen und bereiteten für den Kriegs- und Spannungsfall Sabotage- oder Mordaktionen vor”. Eine bislang noch unbekannte Zahl von Bundesbürgern, die vom MfS als “feindlich” eingestuft wurden, darunter Schriftsteller, Journalisten und Politiker, wurden systematisch mit sogenannten “Zersetzungsmaßnahmen” überzogen. Und prominente DDR-Kritiker wie Wolf Biermann oder Jürgen Fuchs entgingen auch im Westen nicht der Verfolgung durch die Stasi.Knabes Buch macht deutlich, dass die Stasi kein spezifisch ostdeutsches Problem ist. Ihre Tätigkeit war in erheblichen Maße gegen die alte Bundesrepublik gerichtet, und der Westen wurde gezielt “bearbeitet” und planmäßig infiltriert. Die unterwanderte Republik fasst den heutigen Kenntnisstand zu diesem brisanten Kapitel der bundesdeutschen Geschichte in anschaulicher Weise zusammen. Die abschließenden Bewertung aber muss der weiteren Forschung überlassen bleiben. –Stephan Fingerle

Die Aufarbeitung der Stasi-Vergangenheit wird gemeinhin als Problem der Ostdeutschen betrachtet. Tatsächlich war die Tätigkeit des Ministeriums für Staatssicherheit (MfS) aber in erheblichem Maße auch auf die westdeutsche Gesellschaft gerichtet. Nur wenigen ist bewußt, wie groß das Ausmaß geheimdienstlicher Durchdringung der alten Bundesrepublik war.
Der Historiker Hubertus Knabe hat in den ehemaligen Stasi-Archiven systematisch die West-Arbeit des MfS erforscht. Obwohl die Stasi in großem Maße Spurenbeseitigung betrieb, kann er erstmals im Detail zeigen, wie sie den Westen infiltrierte. Mehr als 20.000 Westdeutsche lieferten regelmäßig Informationen aus Parteien, Verbänden, Unternehmen, Kirchen, Medien, Universitäten, Geheimdiensten. Vom vorzeitigen Amtsverzicht des Bundespräsidenten Heinrich Lübke bis zum Scheitern des Mißtrauensvotums gegen Bundeskanzler Willy Brandt, von der Studentenbewegung des Jahres 1968 bis zu den Anti-Raketen-Protesten der achziger Jahre – die Stasi war immer dabei.
Knabes Buch macht auf beklemmende Weise deutlich, wie sehr die Stasi letzlich ein gesamtdeutsches Problem ist. Keine Darstellung der deutschen Nachkriegsgeschichte wird künftig dieses nach wie vor brisante Kapitel aussparen können. Das Ministerium für Staatssicherheit hatte über 100 Spitzel auf die Unterwanderung westdeutscher Menschenrechtsorganisationen angesetzt. Ihre Akten liegen fast vollständig im Archiv der Gauck-Behörde. Die Inoffiziellen Mitarbeiter (IM) wurden noch 1989 aus der DDR in den Westen geschickt.

Sie hatten den Auftrag, etwa die West-Berliner Arbeitsgemeinschaft 13. August und die Gesellschaft für Menschenrechte zu unterwandern. Einige der Stasi-Spitzel stiegen sogar in Führungspositionen auf oder gründeten eigene Ortsgruppen. In den IM-Akten finden sich Schriftwechsel, Hilfeersuchen von DDR-Bürgern und detaillierte Berichte über geplante Betreuungsmaßnahmen. Auf die früher in West-Berlin obligatorischen Vernehmungen durch westliche Geheimdienste waren die Agenten gut vorbereitet. So erzählte ein Spitzel namens “Axel” den Staatsschützern auftragsgemäß, er sei von der Stasi bei Vernehmungen geschlagen worden.

Andere Mielke-Spitzel wurden Mitglieder von Fluchthilfeorganisationen und verrieten ihre Schützlinge an die Stasi. So lieferte einer der Fluchthelfer der “gerichtsbekannten kriminellen Bande Fürch” (Neues Deutschland) fast jeden seiner Schützlinge nicht im Westen, sondern bei der Stasi ab. Auch die Aufnahmelager für DDR-Bürger in Gießen und in West-Berlin wurden mit Hilfe von Stasi-Spähern kontrolliert. Einigen gelang es, enge Kontakte zu konservativen West-Politikern zu knüpfen und sie auszuspähen. Der IM “Karl Diener” verschaffte der Stasi “operativ bedeutsame Informationen” zur Deutschlandpolitik. Quelle laut Stasi-Maßnahmeplan: “ein Repräsentant der Regierungskoalition der BRD”.

//


Wie sich Google-Deutschland aus der Stalker-Verantwortung ziehen will – Korrespondenz meines Anwaltes mit Google

Subject:       Google – Goldman, Morgenstern & Partners]
From:       office@generalglobalmedia.com
Date:       Fri, July 1, 2011 1:19 pm
To:       lis-global@google.com
Priority:       High
Read receipt:       requested
Options:       View Full Header | View Printable Version  | Download this as a file

Dear Sirs,

1) I have never seen any legitimation from you. There is not even a name
on your correspondence.

2) We have proven our legitimation over and over again.

3). The case is in public interest and even the Landeskriminalamt Bayern
is already investigating “GoMoPa” and it’s backers. The damage caused by
the Cyberstalkers of “GoMoPa” exceeds $ 1 billion. Only the damage caused
in the Wirecard affair exceeds $ 200 million by destroying the stock
value of a reputable company.

4). Google displays ads at the “GoMoPa” site. Therefore they are business
partners.

5) We have given you our adress in London 5 times.

6) Details of these mails have been used by “GoMoPa” as third party and
this email-adress has been th subject of trojan attacks shortly after each
correspondence with you.

7) Many independent institutions doubt that Google Germany GmbH is not
responsable for the German search results. This will be also subject of
investigation.

8) All your activities sum up in a bureaucratic manoeuvre to keep
supporting the Cyberstalkers of “GoMoPa” and their activities.

9) As this is a case of public interest we will provide the investigating
persons at Landeskriminalamt Bayern (Special Task Force Unit Munich) with
all details.

Sincerely yours

Joel Greenbaum

> Sehr geehrter Herr Greenbaum,
>
> erneut haben wir heute E-Mails von Ihnen erhalten, die Sie an die Google
> Inc., die Google Germany GmbH sowie an den Leiter der Rechtsabteilung der
> Google Germany GmbH geschickt haben. Seit mehreren Wochen versenden Sie
> E-Mails an verschiedene Empfänger, die häufig einen identischen oder
> ähnlichen Inhalt aufweisen. Sie fordern die Empfänger der E-Mails
> jeweils
> auf, Suchergebnisse über einen Herrn Bernd Pulch zu entfernen.
>
> Auf Ihre bisherigen E-Mails haben sowohl die Google Inc. als auch die
> Google
> Germany GmbH bereits mehrfach geantwortet. Die Hartnäckigkeit, mit der
> Sie
> Ihr Anliegen vortragen, veranlasst zu folgenden Ausführungen:
>
> Die Websuche unter http://www.google.de wird ausschließlich von der Google Inc.
> angeboten. Weder die Google Germany GmbH noch Mitarbeiter dieser
> Gesellschaft sind für die Inhalte verantwortlich. Sie sind weder
> rechtlich
> noch technisch in der Lage, Zugriff auf diese Suchergebnisse zu nehmen.
> Auf
> diesen Umstand wurden Sie mehrfach hingewiesen. Er lässt sich auch dem
> Impressum der Website entnehmen.
>
>
> Wir dürfen Sie daher letztmalig auffordern, etwaige Korrespondenz in
> dieser
> Angelegenheit ausschließlich mit der Google Inc. zu führen. Sollten Sie
> auch
> in Zukunft Korrespondenz in Sachen Pulch an die Google Germany GmbH oder
> ihre Mitarbeiter richten, werden diese nicht mehr zur Kenntnis genommen
> und
> beantwortet werden. Sollten Sie weiterhin neue Suchergebnisse in der
> deutschen Websuche unter http://www.google.de beanstanden wollen, steht es Ihnen
> frei, sich über das hier verlinkte Hilfe-Forum an die Google Inc. zu
> wenden.
> Bitte beachten Sie, dass die Google Inc. Ihre Anliegen nur prüfen kann,
> wenn
> Sie die von Ihnen beanstandeten Webseiten unter Angabe der vollständigen
> URL
> konkret benennen und erläutern, weshalb Suchergebnisse Ihrer Auffassung
> nach
> aus dem Suchindex entfernt werden sollten. Ihre E-Mails werden diesen
> Anforderungen in der Regel nicht gerecht.
>
>
> Die Google Inc. hat die von Ihnen in der Vergangenheit beanstandeten
> Internetseiten aus dem Index für die deutsche Websuche unter
> http://www.google.deentfernt, sofern sie offensichtlich rechtswidrig waren,
> und hat Sie hiervon
> jeweils per E-Mail in Kenntnis gesetzt. Ihre Behauptungen, Suchergebnisse
> seien aus der Suchergebnisliste unter google.de nicht entfernt worden,
> sind
> unzutreffend. Sollten Sie aus England (dies scheint der Sitz der
> Gesellschaft General Global Media Ltd zu sein) oder Österreich (Ist dies
> der
> Sitz Ihres Mandanten Herrn Pulch?) auf die dortigen lokalen Google Domains
> (
> google.co.uk oder google.at) zugreifen, werden die Ergebnisse ggf weiter
> angezeigt.
>
>
> Es bestehen ernsthafte Zweifel daran, dass Sie Herrn Bernd Pulch
> ordnungsgemäß vertreten. Die von Ihnen nunmehr vorgelegte Vollmacht
> räumt
> bestehende Zweifel nicht aus. Da wir zudem nicht wissen, mit wem wir
> korrespondieren, dürfen wir Sie im Namen der Google Inc. nochmals bitten,
> der Google Inc. Ihren vollständigen Namen, Ihre aktuelle Anschrift und
> Ihre
> aktuellen Kontaktinformationen, sowie die Ihres Mandanten zukommen zu
> lassen. Ferner dürfen wir um geeignete Unterlagen zum Nachweis Ihrer
> Tätigkeit als Rechtsanwalt bitten. Ohne Vorlage dieser Informationen wird
> die Google Inc. keine weitere Korrespondenz mit Ihnen führen.
>
>
> Bei Internet-Recherchen in Sachen Greenbaum/Pulch mussten wir feststellen,
> dass offenbar jemand versucht, über diverse Blogs und Foren „Druck“
> auf
> Google auszuüben, um Suchergebnisse entfernen zu lassen.
> Selbstverständlich
> steht es jedermann frei, seine Meinung im Rahmen des rechtlich Zulässigen
> zu
> äußern. Wir mussten allerdings feststellen, dass die Grenzen des
> rechtlich
> Zulässigen mehrfach überschritten wurden: die Marke Google wurde
> markenrechtswidrig verwandt, unwahre Behauptungen wurden aufgestellt und
> Bilder von Mitarbeitern wurden urheberrechtswidrig und unter Verstoß
> gegen
> das Kunsturhebergesetz verwandt. Wir behalten uns ausdrücklich vor, gegen
> das offenbar strafbare Verhalten des Verursachers vorzugehen. Bitte teilen
> Sie dies Ihrem Mandaten mit, sollte er hiermit etwas zu tun haben. Da
> Korrespondenz zwischen Ihnen und Google veröffentlicht wurde, drängt
> sich
> die Annahme auf, dass die Korrespondenz von Ihnen, Ihrem Mandanten oder
> jedenfalls aus Ihrer Sphäre veröffentlicht wurde. Wir fordern Sie und
> Ihren
> Mandanten dringend auf, dies zu unterlassen.
>
>
> Mit dem von Ihnen kritisierten Unternehmen Goldman Morgenstern and
> Partners
> LLC (GoMoPa) oder der Webseite unter http://www.gomopa.net oder gomopa.org steht
> Google in keinem gesellschaftsrechtlichen oder inhaltichen Zusammenhang.
> Dortige Inhalte macht sich Google weder zu eigen noch behandelt sie diese
> unterschiedlich von Inhalten anderer Anbieter.
>
>
> In die Veröffentlichung dieses Schreibens durch Sie, Ihren Mandanten oder
> Dritte wird ausdrücklich nicht eingewilligt.
>
> Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
> Rechtsabteilung, Google Germany GmbH
>
> —
> Google Germany GmbH
> ABC – Strasse 19
> 20354 Hamburg
>
> AG Hamburg, HRB 86891
>
> Sitz der Gesellschaft: Hamburg
> Geschäftsführer: John Herlihy, Graham Law, Lloyd Martin, Kent Walker

FAZ ÜBER DIE SERIENWEISE VORBESTRAFTEN KRIMINELLEN DER “GoMoPa” IM AUFTRAG IRRER DURCHGEKNALLTEN HINTERMÄNNER MUTMASSLICH RESCH, EHLERS UND BENNEWIRTZ

http://www.faz.net/artikel/C30350/wirtschaftskriminalitaet-grossrazzia-wegen-verdachts-auf-insiderhandel-30309286.html

http://www.faz.net/artikel/C30857/cyberstalking-im-netz-30321544.html

JOURNALIST MARTIN SACHS ENTHÜLLT DIE STALKER DER FINGIERTEN “GoMoPa”. PARTNER VON PETER EHLERS

die-fassade-des-gomopa-netzwerks-09.2010

VORSTRAFE FÜR DEN “GoMoPa”-CEO WEGEN BETRUGES AM EIGENEN “GoMoPa”-Anleger

siehe Opferstellungnahme

http://www.victims-opfer.com/?p=6586

 

Liebe Opfer,

offensichtlich hat die Berichterstattung der letzten Stunden einen Cyber-Zombie unsanft geweckt:  Klaus Maurischat (Aktenzeichen Krefeld vom 24. April 2006; AZ: 28 Ls 85/05) , den Cyber-Untoten aus Dörverden.

http://www.google.de/#hl=de&safe=off&&sa=X&ei=lnanTMyMAcrOswbxwZGsDA&ved=0CB4QBSgA&q=klaus+maurischat&spell=1&fp=e5a16b5caccea156

Wieder einmal entzieht sich der vorbestrafte Betrüger Klaus Maurischaft (Aktenzeichen Krefeld vom 24. April 2006; AZ: 28 Ls 85/05) zunächst einmal dem Zugriff der Justiz.

Maurischaft,  ,, die “Loose Cannon” der Anlagebetrüger und Offshore – Ganoven  – eine “TATSÄCHLICH vorbestrafte Unguided Cyber – Cruise Missile” (Aktenzeichen Krefeld vom 24. April 2006; AZ: 28 Ls 85/05) ,mit defekter Steuerung, ohne Photo und ohne Moral und seit neuestem auch ohne Büro-Adresse.

Presse-Klagen erreichen ihn nicht, da sein Berliner Büro nach der Durchsuchung durch die Staatsanwaltschaft aufgelöst wurde, worüber die gesamte deutsche Presse von FAZ, über Handelsblatt, zur Süddeutschen Zeitung etc etc pp. berichteteten.

Nachdem sein Cyber-Terror-Netz jetzt durch unsere Daten  enthüllt worden ist, sollte Klaus Dieter Maurischat (Aktenzeichen Krefeld vom 24. April 2006; AZ: 28 Ls 85/05) sich endlich der Staatsanwaltschaft wegen dem feigen Cyber –  Mord an Heinz Gerlach selber stellen.

Dennoch verbreitet er seine haltlosen Verleumdungen ohne den Hauch eines Beweises weiter.

Ein unbeirrbarer Betrüger eben, der in seiner Cyber-Wahn-Welt Fakten nicht mehr von Märchen trennen kann oder will.

Da Maurischat (Aktenzeichen Krefeld vom 24. April 2006; AZ: 28 Ls 85/05) ,TATSÄCHLICH nachgewiesenerweise ein vorbetrafter Betrüger ist im Gegensatz zu seinen Verleumdungsopfern sprechen hier Fakten für sich:

Wir werden daher dem Cyberkriminellen und mutmasslichen Cyber-Mörder Maurischat, bei seinen Opfern bekannt und berüchtigt (zeigen was FAKTEN sind und was Verleumdungen sind:

Hier fürs erste der Fakt “TATSÄCHLICHE VORSTRAFE KLAUS MAURISCHAFT” – der sich nicht traut ein Photo von sich ins Internet zu stellen:

Klaus Maurischat ( Aktenzeichen Krefeld vom 24. April 2006; AZ: 28 Ls 85/05 – Am 24. April 2006 war die Verhandlung am Amtsgericht Krefeld in der Betrugssache: Mark Vornkahl / Klaus Maurischat ./. Dehnfeld. Aktenzeichen: 28 Ls 85/05, Klaus Maurischat, Lange Straße 38, 27313 Dörverden)

siehe auch

http://de.wordpress.com/tag/das-urteil-gegen-klaus-maurischat/

FAKT IST: Klaus Maurischat ist vorbestraft

Aktenzeichen Krefeld vom 24. April 2006; AZ: 28 Ls 85/05 – Am 24. April 2006 war die Verhandlung am Amtsgericht Krefeld in der Betrugssache: Mark Vornkahl / Klaus Maurischat ./. Dehnfeld. Aktenzeichen: 28 Ls 85/05, Klaus Maurischat, Lange Straße 38, 27313 Dörverden)

VERLEUMDUNGEN z.B. eine von sehr vielen Verleumdungen : Magister Bernd Pulch hat seinen Titel rechtmässig an der Universität Mainz bei Professor Kepplinger erworben.

Magister Bernd Pulch
Dolf Zillmanns Studien zur ‘Emotional-Arousal-Theory’
Januar 1987

Wir haben Bernd Pulch kontaktiert und ihn auf die Verleumdungen gegen und ihn und andere Personen angesprochen:  ”Klaus Maurischat ist ein vorbestrafter, geltungssüchtiger Krimineller, ohne Titel.  Die kriminellen Verleumdungen weisen wir entschieden zurück. Ansonsten ermitteln diverse Staatsanwaltschaften gegen Maurischat, der mich und meine Mitarbeiter verleumden will, um kriminelle Anlagebetrüger zu beschützen.  Die Machenschaften dieses vorbestraften Kriminellen sind – wie jeder und er selber am Besten weiss – allseits bekannt.

Sicher bin ich auch nicht für Ihre Seite publizistisch verantwortlich. Wir würden sie anders gestalten. Aber in Ihrem Kampf gegen kriminelle Cyber-Mörder stehe ich – wie auch viele meiner Journalisten-Kollegen- voll und ganz hinter Ihnen und wünsche Ihnen weiterhin viel Erfolg. Damit kritische Journalisten  und zu denen rechne ich auch Heinz Gerlach – trotz aller Differenzen nicht weiterhin Opfer eines  – bitte zitieren Sie mich an dieser Stelle korrekt – amoklaufenden TATSÄCHLICH vorbestraften Betrügers sind.  Wir haben Herrn Gerlach bereits 1993 in einem Artikel als “Anlegerwolf im Schafspelz” bezeichnet und vor Gericht überwiegend Recht behalten. Aber Cyber-Rufmord, der womöglich in einen tatsächlichen Mord mündete, geht entschieden zu weit. ”

FAKT IST:

Der Titel Magister leitet sich ab von Magister Artium.

siehe

http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magister

Für Maurischat, der selber keinen Titel hat, scheint es unverständlich zu sein, wenn es Leute gibt, die tatsächlich einen Titel haben, tatsächlich nicht käuflich sind, tatsächlich unbescholten und tatsächlich auch international agieren können.

Er ist dringend auf die Aufträge von SJB-Bennewirtz angewiesen, erst recht seit die Immovation-Klage Erfolg hatte, was zur Folge hatte, dass sein Berliner Büro aufgelöst wurde.

Klaus Maurischat (Aktenzeichen Krefeld vom 24. April 2006; AZ: 28 Ls 85/05), die “Unguided Cruise Missile”  der Anlagebetrüger, die Heinz Gerlach beerben wollte – ein Fall für die Staatsanwaltschaft und ein Fall für die Lobotomie.

Tatsächlich wird uns dieser Exkurs nicht davon abbringen, darüber zu berichten, was tatsächlich unser Thema ist:  Die Machenschaften der SJB .

In den letzten Tagen stellt sich uns vermehrt die Frage: Wollen die Fondsgangster aus Korschenbroich mit Maurischat als Gomopa-Strohmann und Peter Ehlers als “Das Investment/Der Fonds”-Strohmann Heinz Gerlach beerben ?

Peter Ehlers war auf dem Begräbnis von Heinz Gerlach.

 

OPFER STELLUNGNAHME ENDE

 

see more at http://www.berndpulch.co,  http://www.berndpulch.co.uk, http://www.berndpulch.com, http://www.berndpulch.de, http://www.berndpulch.info, http://www.berndpulch.at and http://www.berndpuch.net

OPFER SAGEN: “DUBIOS” IST HIER NUR EINE “SCHEISSHAUSFLIEGE” (EIGENBEZICHNUNG) JOCHEN RESCH UND SEIN STALKING-PARTNER AUS DER STASI: “PETER EHLERS UND GERD BENNEWIRTZ!”

SO SEHEN IHN SEINE “GoMoPa”-OPFER AM LIEBSTEN: RA JOCHEN RESCH

 

SEIN KONGENIALER STROHMANN: KLAUS “DIOXIN-SIEWERT”-MAURICHAT

OFFENER E-MAIL BRIEF AN RA JOCHEN RESCH, GOMOPA, UND RA OBERST DER DDR EHRENFRIED STELZER UND OFFIZIER IM WESTEINSATZ PETER EHLERS

Sehr geehrte Herren Ehlers, Resch und Stelzer,

da Sie ja alle Bekannte meinerseits seit dem Jahr meiner Geburt, 1959, “heimgesucht” haben, denke ich ich erspare Ihnen und mir einige Mühen…

Mir fehlen noch einige Details zu Ihrer Zusammenarbeit respektive “GoMoPa” etc. insbesondere zu “Toxdat” und der Praxis-Erfahrung, die Sie ja nachgewiessermassen haben.

Gerne sende ich Ihnen  die Fragen als “Offenen Brief” per E-Mail. Oder auch “vertraulich”

an DaveURandom oder Anonyme oder auch Publik.

Ich freue mich auf einen interessanten Diskurs mit Un-Menschen einer anderen Spezies…

Magister Bernd Pulch

Journalist

STALKING-STUDIE GEGEN DIE SERIEN-STALKER DER “GoMoPa” UND IHREN AUFRAGGEBER “PETER EHLERS”

Die Stalking-Studie der Uni Darmstadt

An der Technischen Universität Darmstadt wurde im Zeitraum von 2002 bis 2005 die bisher größte wissenschaftliche Studie zum Thema Stalking im deutschsprachigen Raum erstellt. Das Projekt war durch die Unterstützung des Weißen Rings ermöglicht worden, da staatliche Stellen eine Finanzierung abgelehnt hatten.

Die Ergebnisse der Studie kurz und knapp

  • Es mangelt an Hilfsangeboten für die Opfer
  • Polizei oft hilflos, bagatellisiert das Problem oder hielt das Problem für eine Privatangelegenheit
  • Durchschnittliche Dauer des Stalkings betrug 28 Monate
  • Stalker waren zu 49% Ex-Partner, zu 9% Fremde
  • 81% der Stalker waren männlich
  • Gewalttätigkeiten bei Stalking betrug 39%
  • 66% der Opfer litten unter Schlafstörungen und Albträumen
  • häufige Krankschreibungen nach Stalkingattacken
  • 55% der Stalker haben einen höheren Bildungsabschluss

 http://www.gegenstalking.de/stalking-studie.html

“DUBIOS” – DER SPIEGEL ÜBER DEN MUTMASSLICHEN “GoMoPa”-CHEF RA JOCHEN RESCH UND SEINE STASI-CONNECTIONS-LISTE DER STASI MIT-ARBEITER

http://www.spiegel.de/spiegel/print/d-65717414.html

PRESSE-ERKLÄRUNG: STASI-MITARBEITER-LISTE MIT KLARNAMEN ZUM DOWNLOADEN

Diese Liste beinhaltet die Namen von 90.598 Mitarbeitern des Ministeriums für Staatssicherheit der DDR. Die Liste ist nicht vollständig. Insbesondere Mitarbeiter der Führungsebene sind nicht enthalten.

This is a list of 90.598 members of the secret police of East Germany (Ministry for State Security), the list isn’t complete, because the most of the high Officiers lieke Colonel and higher have destroyed the personal Informations in the last days of Eastern Germany.

Listen der Stasimitarbeiter-hier findest Du sie! Was bedeuten die Zahlen?
1.Listen der Stasi-Diensteinheiten!
Bem.:hier kannst du die Nr.(6-stellig) der Dienststellen heraussuchen.
2.Liste der Stasi-Mitarbeiter (Hauptamtlich)
Bem.:Hoffentlich hast Du einen guten Rechner, denn die Liste ist erschreckend lang. Die ersten 6 Ziffern sind das Geburtsdatum + die nächsten 6 Ziffern = Dienstausweisnummer! Die zwei Ziffern hinter dem Geburtsdatum geben das Geschlecht an: 41 und 42 = Männlich, 51 und 52 = Weiblich! Wichtig für suchen und finden, sind die sechs Ziffern in den Semikolon vor den Namen: z.B. ;07;00;44; ! Das ist die Nummer der Dienststelle !
Also du suchst in der Liste der Dienststellen, die Nummer der Dienststelle, die Dich interessiert. Damit gehst Du in die Liste der Mitarbeiter und suchst Dir alle Mitarbeiter der entsprechenden Dienststelle heraus. Ich habe das für mein Wohnort getan und so alle Mitarbeiter gefunden. Ob die Liste Vollständig ist kann ich nicht einschätzen, aber zumindest er/kannte ich einige Exverräter vom Namen her.
3.Liste der OibE (Offiziere im besonderen Einsatz)

Hiermit stelle ich eine Liste der Stasi-Mitarbeiter mit Ihrem Klarnamen zum Download ins Internet.

Sie können die STASI-Mitarbeiter-Liste hier Downloaden

http://www.berndpulch.com/dubios-der-spiegel-uber-den-mutmasslichen-gomopa-chef-ra-jochen-resch-und-seine-stasi-connections-listder-stasi-mit-arbeiter/

ORIGINA-ERPRESSERMAIL VON MUTMASSLICH PETER EHLERS (NUN “GoMoPa”): “NUR WIR BESTIMMEN WENN EURE WEBSITES ONLINE SIND”

----------------------------

 Original Message ----------------------------
Subject: Hallo, Ihr beiden Schwachmaten,
From:    "Anne Onime" <anonymous@rip.ax.lt>
Date:    Sun, September 12, 2010 1:11 pm
To:      office@ebizz.tv
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

wie gefallen sie Euch, unsere neuen Websites?
Aufklaerung vom Feinsten. Nicht wahr Pulch ?
X's Website ist nun in wenigen Tagen auch fertig.
Dann geht die Post richtig ab. Ob sie dann weiterhin noch
beruflichen und geschaeftlichen Erfolg haben wird?
Natuerlich nicht?
Morgen erscheinen einige neue Kommentare von unserem
Admin Nighthawk. Naja und dann im Laufe in der kommenden Woche
gehen Eure Schmierseiten ja Offline. Und nur wir bestimmen,
wann sie wieder Online stehen wird. Wetten?

LANDESKRIMINALAMT BAYERN ERMITTELT GEGEN FINGIERTE “GoMoPa” UND DEREN PARTNER

Liebe Leser,

offensichtlich ermittelt das Landeskriminalamt Bayern gegen “GoMoPa”

– wegen organisierter Kriminalität, schweren Betruges, Kursmanipulation, Insidergeschäften und der Verbreitung falscher Nachrichten – ausgelöst durch die “Wirecard-Affäre”.

http://www.handelsblatt.com/finanzen/boerse-maerkte/boerse-inside/finanzaufsicht-untersucht-kursachterbahn-bei-wirecard/3406252.html

http://www.usag24-betrug.com/index.php/gomopas-wirecard-behauptungen-zweifelhaft-schuett-hat-keinerlei-behauptungen-zu-wirecard-gemacht/

Der Ausgangspunkt:

Die Münchner Staatsanwaltschaft rechnet nach einer großangelegten Razzia wegen des Verdachts auf Marktmanipulation und Insiderhandel mit Aktien noch mit längeren Ermittlungen. Zunächst müsse das umfangreiche Material aus den Durchsuchungen ausgewertet werden, sagte eine Behördensprecherin am Freitag in München. Die Ermittler hatten am Dienstag in einer spektakulären Aktion die Büros und Wohnungen von Dutzenden Verdächtigen durchsuchen lassen. Details zu den Beschuldigten oder betroffenen Firmen nannte die Sprecherin nicht. Die Behörde ermittelt bereits seit Jahren.

Bei der Aktion waren insgesamt 48 Büro- und Privaträume bundesweit und in Österreich durchsucht worden. Die Ermittlungen richteten sich gegen 31 Verdächtige, betroffen seien Aktien von 20 verschiedenen Gesellschaften. Drei Beschuldigte sitzen seither in Untersuchungshaft. Nach Angaben aus Finanzkreisen soll es sich bei den Verdächtigen vor allem um Mitarbeiter sogenannter Börsenbriefe handeln, die Anlegern unter anderem Ratschläge zu Aktien geben.

Im wesentlichen gehe es bei den Ermittlungen um Kursmanipulationen mit fast wertlosen Aktien – sogenannten Pennystocks – deren Kurse durch gezielt positive Nachrichten nach oben getrieben und dann wieder verkauft werden. Teilweise seien auch andere Aktien durch negative Nachrichten in die Verlustzone gebracht und daraus Geschäfte gemacht worden. Welche Aktiengesellschaften von den Machenschaften betroffen sein könnten, wollte die Staatsanwaltschaft nicht sagen.

Ebenfalls durchsucht wurden Geschäftsräume der Schutzgemeinschaft der Kapitalanleger in München (SdK), wie SdK-Sprecher Lars Labryga am Freitag bestätigte. Die SdK sei allerdings nur in zwei Fällen von den Ermittlungen betroffen. Im Zusammenhang damit waren die Räume der SdK bereits vor zwei Jahren durchsucht worden. Die Vorwürfe richteten sich aber nicht gegen die SdK, sondern weiterhin gegen einen früheren stellvertretenden SdK-Vorsitzenden.

Infos über “GoMoPa” bitte an

Staatsanwaltschaft München I

Linprunstraße 25

80335 München

Telefon: 089 / 5597-07

Fax: 089 / 5597-4131

E-Mail: poststelle@sta-m1.bayern.de

Internet: www.justiz.bayern.de/sta/sta/m1/

DDR1 TV 1987 Stasi Fake Anti-Fascist Mikis Theodorakis Show

Stalinistische Fälschungen

Cyber-Krieg: Junge Syrer dokumentieren Gräuel im Internet

Roland Jahn – Der STASI-Aufklärer

 

OPFER-INFO: LKA BAYERN ERMITTELT GEGEN “GoMoPa” UND DEREN KRIMINELLE PARTNER

Liebe Mit-Opfer,

zuständig ist auch Oberstaatsanwalt Anton E. Winkler bei der Staatsanwaltschaft München:

Staatsanwaltschaft München I

Linprunstraße 25

80335 München

Telefon: 089 / 5597-07

Fax: 089 / 5597-4131

E-Mail: poststelle@sta-m1.bayern.de

Internet: www.justiz.bayern.de/sta/sta/m1/

LG

H.K-W.

München

US-Staaten starten Kartellermittlungen gegen Google

 

 

Der Internet-Riese Google ist in den USA offenbar auf breiter Front ins Visier der Wettbewerbshüter geraten.

Die Staatsanwaltschaften mindestens dreier US-Bundesstaaten prüfen Kreisen zufolge, ob der weltgrößte Suchmaschinenbetreiber seine Marktmacht missbraucht. Die Ermittlungen der Behörden aus Kalifornien, New York und Ohio stünden noch am Anfang, sagte eine mit der Angelegenheit vertraute Person am Donnerstag. Google wird von Konkurrenten vorgeworfen, Rivalen mit seiner Dominanz gezielt auszubremsen. Laut “Wall Street Journal” könnte zudem die Handelsbehörde FTC von Google in Kürze Einblick in die Geschäfte verlangen. In der EU läuft seit November eine Kartelluntersuchung gegen Google.

Sämtliche Beteiligte in den USA lehnten eine Stellungnahme ab oder waren dafür zunächst nicht zu erreichen. Die “Financial Times” hatte zuerst über die Ermittlungen der Staatsanwälte berichtet.

Der Neue – Roland Jahn neuer Chef der STASI-Behörde

WIE MICH MUTMASLICH “PETER EHLERS” (nun “GoMoPa”) ERPRESST MIT STALKING-KAMPAGNEN

 

————————— Original Message —————————-

Subject: Hardcore: http://www.k…..pulch….

From: “George Orwell” Date: Wed, August 25, 2010 9:45 pm

To: office@ebizz.tv ————————————————————————–

Nun, Grossmeister Pulch, in den kommenden Monaten steht Ihnen ein heisser, schmutziger, hardcore Winter bevor. Sie betreiben Seiten im Internet und wir werden Ihnen zeigen wie es aussieht, wenn der eigene Namen, die eigene Familie, im WWW erledigt wird. Was mag man dazu sagen, dass Sie Kinderficker sind? Was sagen die Bekannten dazu, die eigene Familie, die Nachbarn? Nun, sie werden alles erfahren. In wenigen Tagen. Der Countdown laeuft. http://www.kinderficker-pulch…. und …

Ein letzter Rat, schliessen Sie Ihre Internet-Seiten. Sofort. Loeschen Sie Ihr ebizz.tv. Sofort. Sie haben nicht viel Zeit Grossmeister und Ihre Handlanger auch nicht.

Sie werden in jedem WWW-Pranger, International, als Kinderficker stehen. Und Sie Kleinmeister S, werden mit Familie auf Ihrer eigenen Website daran beteiligt sein. Innerhalb drei Tagen, werden Sie alle bei Google die Spitzenplaetze belegen. Das ist schon jetzt versprochen. Handeln Sie, SOFORT, oder Sie werden keine Ruhe mehr finden. Sie haben keine Zeit mehr Pulch. Wir arbeiten uebrigens anonym.

 

Il mittente di questo messaggio|The sender address of this non corrisponde ad un utente |message is not related to a real reale ma all’indirizzo fittizio|person but to a fake address of an di un sistema anonimizzatore |anonymous system Per maggiori informazioni |For more info https://www.mixmaster.it

STASI “GoMoPas” neues STALKING UND RUFMORD-OPFER IST BORIS BECKER – NACH DEM CYBER-MOBBING VON ANGELA MERKEL UND WOLFGANG SCHÄUBLE – -MEHR ALS 3.600 OPFER

siehe

 

Bericht auf der Opferseite

 

http://www.victims-opfer.com/?p=17958

WIE AUCH Sie Opfer der fingierten “GoMoPa” und derem mutmasslichen Partner “Peter Ehlers” werden können

GASTBEITRAG

Liebe Leserin, lieber Leser!

Stellen Sie sich bitte kurz vor, dass Sie mit einer tollen Geschäftsidee oder einer Geschäftserweiterung zu mehr Geld kommen möchten. Beispielsweise auch Ihr Unternehmen vergrössern oder gar Ihre Waren exportieren wollen.

Sie werben damit natürlich über die Medien….

Da meldet sich bei Ihnen möglicherweise ein Beauftragter des Finanz-Nachrichtendienstes GoMoPa mit der Mitteilung, dass im GoMoPa-Forum sehr negative Forenbeiträge über Ihre Person oder Ihr Vorhaben stünden. Äusserst Schlimmes wir über Sie berichtet. Zum Beispiel, dass Sie bisher schon Ihr Geld mit betrügerischen Machenschaften verdient hätten oder Ihr Sohn als erfolgreicher Sportler nach neuesten Ermittlungen in einem Kokain-Dealer-Ring verwickelt sei.

Ein anonymer User ( Schreiberling) habe dies geschrieben, wird vom GoMoPa-Beauftragten berichtet. Man könne jetzt noch nicht feststellen, ob dies so wahr sei. Man könne aber auch nicht den Beitrag einfach rausnehmen, denn es könne ja auch was Wahres daran sein!

Falls Sie selbst an der Wahrheitsfindung interessiert seien, könnten Sie auch beim ´seriösen Nachrichtendienst` GoMoPa als Gesellschafter oder als Premium-Mitglied einsteigen, dann könne man ja…..usf. …ganz einfach den Beitrag herausnehmen!

So ähnlich könnte es geschehen und glauben Sie mir: ´Dies ist kein böser Traum,-keine Fata Morgana`, sondern schon Zigtausendmal in der fast 10-Jährigen GoMoPa- Geschichte so abgelaufen.

Wir, von der CSA-Agency, wurden selbst aus Wettbewerbsgründen seit 2002 von GoMoPa auf primitivste Weise im Forum diffamiert oder die von uns als seriöse Dienstleister empfohlenen Unternehmungen wurden per Rufmord mit schmutzigsten, unwahren Verleumdungs-Attacken von anonymen Bloggern ( bezahlte Helfershelfer vom GoMoPa) nahezu ruiniert. Nicht nur finanziell , sondern auch gesundheitlich nieder gemacht! Nicht umsonst heisst es RUFMORD.

Der Begriff ´Stalking` ist da noch eine vornehme Bezeichnung.

Auf gut deutsch passt Rufmord besser.

Geschäftlicher und gesundheitlicher RUFMORD gehört auch entsprechend bestraft.

Die Justiz tut sich sehr schwer damit. Vor allem, wenn die Rufmörder mit Ihren Machenschaften mit Gesellschaften wie z.B. ´GoMoPa` als Briefkastenfirma aus dem Ausland agieren. UND zum anderen, weil sich die Stalking-Terror-Experten von GoMoPa sich mit ihren Methoden auch der Justiz und der Medien bedienen.

Die seriöse Alternative zu systematischem Rufmord

Seriöse Aufklärung hilft!Auch der zuweilen personell überforderten Justiz kann mit entsprechender Aufklärung zum Hintergrund der Go-Mafia ´GoMoPa` und ihrem Paten Klaus Maurischat geholfen werden!

Bitte, Freunde der Gerechtigkeit, helft mit, dem grausigen ´GoMoPa-Rufmord-Terror ein baldiges Ende zu bereiten!

Unterstützt die ´BAG-Illus, den BUND anonyme Gerechtigkeit`

Schaut Euch die Rufmord-Methoden der GoMoPa-Mafia mit ihrem Paten Klaus Maurischat an. Hier zur BAG-Website www.123bagillus.com

Hier zu den aktuell aufgeführten Rufmord-Beispielen http://tinyurl.com/6h5zttc

Hier der Link zum BAG-Blog http://123bagillus.wordpress.com/

Ihr CSA-Agency-Aufklärer Martin Sachs

Opfer wehren sich: “DUBIOS IST JOCHEN RESCH LAUT “SPIEGEL” WEGEN SEINER STASI-KONTAKTE

http://www.spiegel.de/spiegel/print/d-65717414.html

VERBRAUCHERSCHUTZ

Dubiose Doppelrolle

Eine merkwürdige Personalentscheidung des Deutschen Instituts für Anlegerschutz (DIAS) sorgt für Aufsehen: Als neuen geschäftsführenden Vorstand beriefen die Mitglieder des auf die Untersuchung unlauterer Finanzgeschäfte spezialisierten Instituts Ehrenfried Stelzer. Bis zur Wende war Stelzer Leiter der Sektion Kriminalistik an der Ost-Berliner Humboldt-Universität. Die Sektion galt als Stasi-Hochburg, Stelzer selbst diente der Stasi Jahrzehnte als “Offizier im besonderen Einsatz”. Im April war Stelzers Vorgänger Volker Pietsch, der als Finanzspezialist von der Verbraucherzentrale Berlin gekommen war, zurückgetreten. Die Hintergründe von Pietschs Abgang sind unklar, hängen aber möglicherweise mit der unsoliden Finanzsituation des DIAS zusammen. Seit der Gründung vor fünf Jahren ist der Verein wesentlich von Zuwendungen der Berliner Anlegerschutz-Kanzlei Resch abhängig. Deren geschäftsführender Gesellschafter Jochen Resch ist nicht nur DIAS-Mitglied, sondern auch Vorstand der Verbraucherzentrale Brandenburg – eine Doppelfunktion, die Resch dem Vorwurf aussetzt, sich über das DIAS Mandanten zu beschaffen. Resch bestreitet das. Das DIAS sei unabhängig konzipiert “und nie eine Mandantenschaufel” gewesen. Auch der neue DIAS-Vorstand Stelzer gilt als Resch-Mann. Man kenne sich “lange Jahre”, so Resch. Eine von Stelzers ersten Amtshandlungen war es, den gesamten zehnköpfigen Beirat, die meisten darin Juristen, abzuberufen.

DIE DEUTSCHEN MEDIEN ÜBER DIE FINGIERTEN “GoMoPa” MUTMASSLICH GEFÜHRT VON JOCHEN RESCH UND PETER EHLERS

Presseberichterstatung-zu-Maurischat1

DIE SCHEISSHAUSSFLIEGE “GoMoPa” SITZT BEI GOOGLE DEUTSCHLAND AUF DEM SCHOSS

LIEBE LESER

DA ICH FINANZIELL UNABHÄNGIG  BIN; KÖNNEN DIE GOMOPA-GANGSTER UND IHRE GOOGLE-AGENTEN VERBREITEN ÜBER MICH WAS SIE WOLLEN, ES JUCKT MICH, MEINE FAMILIE UND MEINE FREUNDE NICHT: WIR WERDEN SIE ZUR STRECKE BRINGEN-: AUCH GEGEN GOOGLE !

HIER EIN KURZES RESUMEÉ

Liebe Leser,
seit langem wissen die Opfer, dass das System „GoMoP“ nicht ohne Konfidenten bei Google Deutschland funktioniert. Dies haben bereits Lothar Berresheim, Herbert Ernst und Heinz Gerlach erkannt.
Der verantwortliche Manager Arnd Haller, Leiter der Rechsabteilung in Hamburg weiss seit Jahren bereits amtsbekannt von dem Treiben der „GoMoPa“, deren Erpressungen und Cyberstalking.

“Er selber hat bereits mehrere Strafanzeigen kassiert und deckt „GoMoPa“ weiter.
Mehr noch: Kritische, rechtskonforme Kommentare zu „GoMoPa“ werden auf Betreiben von „GoMoPa“-Resch gelöscht und Stalking-Seiten durch den Google-Suchindex gepusht.
Interna aus dieser Korrespondenz, die sonst niemand wissen kann, landen bei Resch und „GoMoPa“”, behaupten die Opfer

Und weiter so die Stalking-Opfer: “”GoMoPa”-Verbindungsmann Nr.1 zu Google Hamburg, der Hamburger Hacker- und Black Hat-Programmierer Thomas Promny pusht die bescheidenen Besucherzahlen von ca 50 pro Tag auf der “GoMoPa”-Seite in Tausende nicht existente Zugriffe durch Blak-Hat-Methoden, die er auch bei der Webseite “dasinvestment.com” anwendet.”

Ehlers Opfer sagen: “GoMoPa”-Verbindungsmann Nr.2 zu Google Hamburg, der Hamburger “Herausgeber” “Peter Ehlers” ,ohne Befähigungsnachweis und Biographie, aufgefallen bundesweit durch  seine Aussage “Angela Merkel und Wolfgang Schäuble sind Deutschlands bekannteste Hehler”.

Ehlers schustert seinem “Partner” Gerd Bennewirtz Anleger, Vertriebe und vertrauliche Infos zu, durch seine Postille “Das Investment” (Der Fonds), an dem

Bennewirtz Ehefrau, die Hausfrau Gaby Bennewirtz 65 % hält.

Nach Insider-Informationen haben die Hamburger „GoMoPa“-Residenten Peter Ehlers und Thomas Promny hier ihre schmutzigen Finger im Cyberstalking- und Erpresserspiel.

DESHALB SIND DIE “GOMOPA”-STALKING-OPFER DEN ERPRESSUNGEN DER “GOMOPA” SCHUTZLOS AUSGELIEFERT: GENAU WIE BEI “GOMOPA” IST AUCH BEI “GOOGLE” IN DEUTSCHLAND NIEMAND ZUSTÄNDIG-WAS FPR EINE PARALLELE UND DESWEGEN GEHEN KLAGEN DER OPFER HIERZULANDE INS LEERE! DAS IST DAS GRUNDPRINZIP MIT DEM DIE DEUTSCHE FINANZBRANCHE ERPRESST WERDEN KANN.
Bei Beschwerden wird darauf verwiesen, dass hierfür die Zentrale in Kalifornieren zuständig sei.
Deren Korrespondenz kommt dann auch mit falschen Zusagen in deutscher Sprache.
Hier liegt der Verdacht nahe, dass die Zuständigkeiten vorgetäuscht werden.
Somit liegt hier ein Betrug vor.
Google will sich hierdurch vor Schadensersatzansprüchen absichern.

Sicher ist: In den USA weiss man nichts von dem Treiben der Hamburger unter der Leitung von Arnd Haller.
Dies werden wir ändern !
Auch die Aktionäre wird dies interessieren.”

mehr unter http://www.victims-opfer.com

Freundliche Grüsse

Heinz Friedrich
Opfer-Sprecher

“Good Morning Kidfucker!”- “GoMoPa”-ERPRESSER DAVE U RANDOM: “WIR WERDEN SIE WIRTSCHAFTLICH UND GESELLSCHAFTLICH ELIMINIEREN!”

"GoMoPa"-ERPRESSER DAVE U RANDOM "WIR WERDEN SIE WIRTSCHAFTLICH UND GESELLSCHAFTLICH ELIMINIEREN!"

MUTMASSLICH VON "GoMoPa" IM AUFTRAG VON "PETER EHLERS" ODER VON "PETER EHLERS" PERSÖNLICH

---------------------------- Original Message ----------------------------
Subject: Good morning kids fucker,
From:    "Dave U. Random" <anonymous@anonymitaet-im-inter.net>
Date:    Thu, September 9, 2010 10:58 am
To:      office@generalglobalmedia.com
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

auf unseren Informationsseiten,
befindet sich der kleine Button:
-Mail to Administrator-.
Interessant was man nicht so alles erfahren darf,
nicht wahr Herr Pulch.
Da bekommen wir doch tatsaechlich eine Email von einem
CDU Mitglied aus Ihrer Gemeinde,
der Meister Pulch auch sehr, sehr, gut kennt.
Tief besorgt ist man dort, Kinderficker,
Kinderpornohaendler und Internet Stalker in der Gemeinde.
Und auch in der katholischen Pfarrkirche,
ist man nach unserer Mitteilung tief
beunruhigt.
Das nennen wir PR-Arbeit. Aber, es kommt ja noch alles viel besser.
Unsere Briefwurfsendung und Internetinserate.
Unser Ziel: Eure gesellschaftliche und wirtschaftliche Eliminierung.
Habt einen schoenen Tag Kids fucker

Liste von 4 Internetseiten STALKER SITES DER "GoMoPa", die sich jeder Strafverfolgung entziehen.

FRANKFURTER ALLGEMEINE ZEITUNG ÜBER “GoMoPa” mutmasslich geführt von Jochen u. Manfred Resch und Peter Ehlers sowie Gerd Bennewirtz

 

http://www.faz.net/artikel/C30350/wirtschaftskriminalitaet-grossrazzia-wegen-verdachts-auf-insiderhandel-30309286.html

http://www.faz.net/artikel/C30857/cyberstalking-im-netz-30321544.html

WIE “GoMoPa” MICH FÄLSCHLICHERWEISE DER PÄDERASTERIE BESCHULDIGT, UM MICH WIRTSCHAFTLICH UND GESELLSCHAFTLICH ZU ELIMINIEREN MUTMASSLICH AUF ORDER VON “PETER EHLERS”

WIE “GoMoPa” MICH FÄLSCHLISCHERWEISE
DER PÄDERASTERIE BESCHULDIGT, UM MICH WIRTSCHAFTLICH UND GESELLSCHAFTLICH ZU ELIMINIEREN MUTMASSLICH AUF ORDER VON “PETER EHLERS” – ORGINAL-EMAIL:

---------------------------- Original Message ----------------------------
Subject: Good morning kids fucker,
From:    "Dave U. Random" <anonymous@anonymitaet-im-inter.net>
Date:    Thu, September 9, 2010 10:58 am
To:      office@generalglobalmedia.com
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

auf unseren Informationsseiten,
befindet sich der kleine Button:
-Mail to Administrator-.
Interessant was man nicht so alles erfahren darf,
nicht wahr Herr Pulch.
Da bekommen wir doch tatsaechlich eine Email von einem
CDU Mitglied aus Ihrer Gemeinde,
der Meister Pulch auch sehr, sehr, gut kennt.
Tief besorgt ist man dort, Kinderficker,
Kinderpornohaendler und Internet Stalker in der Gemeinde.
Und auch in der katholischen Pfarrkirche,
ist man nach unserer Mitteilung tief
beunruhigt.
Das nennen wir PR-Arbeit. Aber, es kommt ja noch alles viel besser.
Unsere Briefwurfsendung und Internetinserate.
Unser Ziel: Eure gesellschaftliche und wirtschaftliche Eliminierung.
Habt einen schoenen Tag Kids fucker

Liste von 4 Internetseiten STALKER SITES DER "GoMoPa", die sich jeder Strafverfolgung entziehen.

Psychofolter in STASI-Haft und Zuchthaus Cottbus

DDR – Die Bilder der Stasi, DOKU – DRAMA – SPIELFILMLÄNGE

ERPRESSERMAIL VON “GoMoPa” IM AUFTRAG VON MUTMASSLICH PETER EHLERS AN MICH

Original Message —————————- Subject: Hallo, Ihr beiden Schwachmaten,

From: “Anne Onime” Date: Sun, September 12, 2010 1:11 pm

To: office@ebizz.tv ————————————————————————–

wie gefallen sie Euch, unsere neuen Websites? Aufklaerung vom Feinsten. Nicht wahr Pulch und S? Ks Website ist nun in wenigen Tagen auch fertig. Dann geht die Post richtig ab. Ob sie dann weiterhin noch beruflichen und geschaeftlichen Erfolg haben wird? Natuerlich nicht? Morgen erscheinen einige neue Kommentare von unserem Admin Nighthawk. Naja und dann im Laufe in der kommenden Woche geht Eure Schmierseite ja Offline. Und nur wir bestimmen, wann sie wieder Online stehen wird. Wetten?

DER ARND-HALLER-GOOGLE-SKANDAL: SUCHMASCHINENBETREIBER DECKT CYBERSTALKER DER “GoMoPa”

Haller

Leiter Rechtsabteilung

Google Germany GmbH
Google Germany GmbH
ABC-Strasse 19
Deutschland
Fon:
+49 040 80 81 79-239
Fax:
+49 040 49 21 90 06

Dr. Arnd Haller deckt die kriminellen Cyberstalker der “GoMoPa” seit Jahren und hat deswegen zahlreiche Strafanzeigen.

Warum deckt er “GoMoPa”  seit Jahren  mit fadenscheinigen Begründungen ?

Google-Skandal: Google bestätigt Rechtswidrigkeit der "GoMoPa"-Einträge - löscht sie aber bis lang nicht trotz Zusage und Strafanzeigen gegen Dr. Arndt Haller, Google, Deutschland nicht,
stecken "Google-IM" mit "GoMoPa" unter einer Decke ?

Trotz der E-Mail wurden nicht alle Stellen gelöscht:

Sie Google-Mail:
  Re: [#717086735] Strafanzeigen gegen Dr. Arndt Haller [Fwd: FBI ermittelt nunmehr gegen Google Inc.: WEITERE STRAFANZEIGEN DRINGENDE ERINNERUNG: Re: AKTENZEICHEN DER KRIMINALPOLIZEI]]]]]]]]
Sehr geehrter Herr Greenbaum,(mein Anwalt)

vielen Dank für Ihre Geduld. Wir haben Ihre Beschwerde gemäß den in dem Land Ihres
Wohnsitzes geltenden Gesetzen verarbeitet. Die folgenden Webseiten wurden aus Google
(www.google.de) entfernt:

xxxxx

Bitte lassen Sie es uns wissen, falls Sie noch weitere Fragen haben.

Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Ihr Google-Team

Google Inc.
Legal Support
1600 Amphitheatre Parkway
Mountain View, CA 94043
USA

Das schriben die anderen “GoMoPa”-Opfer:

Opfer zitieren “GoMoPa: Wer stoppt Google-Rufmorde?”

Hier beschreiben “GoMoPa”-Cyberstalker ihr tun:

GoMoPa: Wer stoppt Google-Rufmorde?

Freie Bahn für Rufmord, Stalking und Existenzvernichtung im Internet. Suchmaschinen lassen sich von Kriminellen als Mittäter missbrauchen. Beispiel Google.

Jede Nachricht kann und darf gefaked sein, denn, so erklärt Oliver Klug von der Google-Presseagentur in Hamburg: “Für den Inhalt der Internetseiten ist Google nicht verantwortlich. Jeder Eingriff, außer bei schwerwiegenden Dingen wie Holocaust-Leugnungen, wäre eine unzulässige Zensur.” Das bedeutet im Klartext: Jeder kann mit Hilfe von Google jede nur erdenkliche Lüge über einen anderen Menschen oder über eine Firma verbreiten.

Klug verteidigt das Google-System: “Sie können doch bei der Polizei Anzeige erstatten und Verleumder verklagen. Mit einem Gerichtsurteil löschen wir selbstverständlich die Seiten.” GoMoPa meint: Das klingt gut, ist aber realitätsfern. Die meisten Verleumder arbeiten anonym und melden ihre Hetzseiten unter falschen Angaben an.

Das musste und muss GoMoPa am eigenen Leib erfahren. Der Finanznachrichtendienst wird seit anderthalb Jahren auf der Seite nepper-schlepper-bauernfaenger.com oder fuer-recht-und-ordnung.com mit Lügen von Hausdurchsuchungen, Festnahmen von Verantwortlichen oder angeblicher Strafanzeigen großer Banken überzogen. Natürlich wehrte sich GoMoPa mit juristischen Schritten. Doch der Verantwortliche der Nepper-Schlepper-Seite, die Rechtsanwaltskanzlei Atle Border mit Sitz in Bangkok (Thailand), ist frei erfunden. Der Server steht in Panama. Klug: “Ohne juristische Schritte können wir da nichts machen, das wäre Zensur.”

GoMoPa konfrontierte die Google-Presseagentur daraufhin mit einer konstruierten Verleumdung gegen Google. Inhalt: “Die Verantwortliche (Admin C) der Google Germany GmbH, Frau Lena Tangerxxxx aus Hamburg, führt nicht nur ein dubioses Doppelleben als Domina in der Herbertstraße auf der Reeperbahn. Lena Tangerxxxx steht kurz vor der Verhaftung. Gegen sie wird wegen Schleusung von russischen Minderjährigen nach Deutschland und Vermittlung an einen belgischen Kinderpornoring ermittelt.”

Die Seite könnte “www.google-schmutz.com” heißen. Anmelder wäre ein erfundener Dr. Alfred Motte aus Bangkok, der Server würde in Panama sitzen. Klug: Dagegen würde Google sofort mit rechtlichen Schritten vorgehen.” GoMoPa: Wie denn, wenn Sie den Absender gar nicht finden können? Darauf Klug: “Wir wüden prüfen, inwieweit anonyme Verleumdungen im Internet gegen unsere Nutzungsbestimmungen verstoßen.” Und aller Wahrscheinlichkeit nach sofort löschen?!!

Wird da mit zweierlei Maß gemessen? Google empfiehlt uns jedenfalls lapidar in einer Mitteilung zu unserem Löschantrag, eventuelle Streitigkeiten direkt mit dem Eigentümer der betreffenden Website beizulegen und teilt weiterhin mit, zum gegenwärtigen Zeitpunkt keine Maßnahmen zur Entfernung der verleumdenden Inhalte ergreifen zu wollen. Fortsetzung folgt.

Quelle: GoMoPa (www.gomopa.net / Siegfried Siewert)

siehe:

http://www.victims-opfer.com/?p=17528

OPFER BERICHTEN UEBER: “DAS DREAM-TEAM “GRIECHEN-GERD, FINGIERTE “GoMoPa”, DIE STROHFRAU AUS KORSCHENBROICH UND PETER EHLERS – ZITAT: MERKEL UND SCHÄUBLE SIND DEUTSCHLANDS HEHLER NR.1″

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

http://www.victims-opfer.com/?page_id=728

http://www.victims-opfer.com/?p=13215

 

über die “Strohfrau”

 

 

http://www.victims-opfer.com/?p=16684

http://www.victims-opfer.com/?p=13157

http://www.victims-opfer.com/?p=6512

 

über “Griechen-Gerd”

 

http://www.victims-opfer.com/

 

über “GoMoPa”

http://www.berndpulch.com/bernd-pulch/%E2%80%9Cminister-schauble-ein-%E2%80%9Chehler%E2%80%9D-und-%E2%80%9Cich-ein-internet-terrorist%E2%80%9D/

 

über PETER EHLERS – ZITAT: MERKEL UND SCHÄUBLE SIND DEUTSCHLANDS HEHLER NR.1

 

 

 

DER GOOGLE-SKANDAL: SUCHMASCHINENBETREIBER DECKT CYBERSTALKER DER “GoMoPa”

Haller

Leiter Rechtsabteilung

Google Germany GmbH
Google Germany GmbH
ABC-Strasse 19
Deutschland
Fon:
+49 040 80 81 79-239
Fax:
+49 040 49 21 90 06

Dr. Arnd Haller deckt die kriminellen Cyberstalker der “GoMoPa” seit Jahren und hat deswegen zahlreiche Strafanzeigen.

Warum deckt er “GoMoPa”  seit Jahren  mit fadenscheinigen Begründungen ?

Google-Skandal: Google bestätigt Rechtswidrigkeit der "GoMoPa"-Einträge - löscht sie aber bis lang nicht trotz Zusage und Strafanzeigen gegen Dr. Arndt Haller, Google, Deutschland nicht,
stecken "Google-IM" mit "GoMoPa" unter einer Decke ?

Trotz der E-Mail wurden nicht alle Stellen gelöscht:

Sie Google-Mail:
  Re: [#717086735] Strafanzeigen gegen Dr. Arndt Haller [Fwd: FBI ermittelt nunmehr gegen Google Inc.: WEITERE STRAFANZEIGEN DRINGENDE ERINNERUNG: Re: AKTENZEICHEN DER KRIMINALPOLIZEI]]]]]]]]
Sehr geehrter Herr Greenbaum,(mein Anwalt)

vielen Dank für Ihre Geduld. Wir haben Ihre Beschwerde gemäß den in dem Land Ihres
Wohnsitzes geltenden Gesetzen verarbeitet. Die folgenden Webseiten wurden aus Google
(www.google.de) entfernt:

xxxxx

Bitte lassen Sie es uns wissen, falls Sie noch weitere Fragen haben.

Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Ihr Google-Team

Google Inc.
Legal Support
1600 Amphitheatre Parkway
Mountain View, CA 94043
USA

Das schriben die anderen “GoMoPa”-Opfer:

Opfer zitieren “GoMoPa: Wer stoppt Google-Rufmorde?”

Hier beschreiben “GoMoPa”-Cyberstalker ihr tun:

GoMoPa: Wer stoppt Google-Rufmorde?

Freie Bahn für Rufmord, Stalking und Existenzvernichtung im Internet. Suchmaschinen lassen sich von Kriminellen als Mittäter missbrauchen. Beispiel Google.

Jede Nachricht kann und darf gefaked sein, denn, so erklärt Oliver Klug von der Google-Presseagentur in Hamburg: “Für den Inhalt der Internetseiten ist Google nicht verantwortlich. Jeder Eingriff, außer bei schwerwiegenden Dingen wie Holocaust-Leugnungen, wäre eine unzulässige Zensur.” Das bedeutet im Klartext: Jeder kann mit Hilfe von Google jede nur erdenkliche Lüge über einen anderen Menschen oder über eine Firma verbreiten.

Klug verteidigt das Google-System: “Sie können doch bei der Polizei Anzeige erstatten und Verleumder verklagen. Mit einem Gerichtsurteil löschen wir selbstverständlich die Seiten.” GoMoPa meint: Das klingt gut, ist aber realitätsfern. Die meisten Verleumder arbeiten anonym und melden ihre Hetzseiten unter falschen Angaben an.

Das musste und muss GoMoPa am eigenen Leib erfahren. Der Finanznachrichtendienst wird seit anderthalb Jahren auf der Seite nepper-schlepper-bauernfaenger.com oder fuer-recht-und-ordnung.com mit Lügen von Hausdurchsuchungen, Festnahmen von Verantwortlichen oder angeblicher Strafanzeigen großer Banken überzogen. Natürlich wehrte sich GoMoPa mit juristischen Schritten. Doch der Verantwortliche der Nepper-Schlepper-Seite, die Rechtsanwaltskanzlei Atle Border mit Sitz in Bangkok (Thailand), ist frei erfunden. Der Server steht in Panama. Klug: “Ohne juristische Schritte können wir da nichts machen, das wäre Zensur.”

GoMoPa konfrontierte die Google-Presseagentur daraufhin mit einer konstruierten Verleumdung gegen Google. Inhalt: “Die Verantwortliche (Admin C) der Google Germany GmbH, Frau Lena Tangerxxxx aus Hamburg, führt nicht nur ein dubioses Doppelleben als Domina in der Herbertstraße auf der Reeperbahn. Lena Tangerxxxx steht kurz vor der Verhaftung. Gegen sie wird wegen Schleusung von russischen Minderjährigen nach Deutschland und Vermittlung an einen belgischen Kinderpornoring ermittelt.”

Die Seite könnte “www.google-schmutz.com” heißen. Anmelder wäre ein erfundener Dr. Alfred Motte aus Bangkok, der Server würde in Panama sitzen. Klug: Dagegen würde Google sofort mit rechtlichen Schritten vorgehen.” GoMoPa: Wie denn, wenn Sie den Absender gar nicht finden können? Darauf Klug: “Wir wüden prüfen, inwieweit anonyme Verleumdungen im Internet gegen unsere Nutzungsbestimmungen verstoßen.” Und aller Wahrscheinlichkeit nach sofort löschen?!!

Wird da mit zweierlei Maß gemessen? Google empfiehlt uns jedenfalls lapidar in einer Mitteilung zu unserem Löschantrag, eventuelle Streitigkeiten direkt mit dem Eigentümer der betreffenden Website beizulegen und teilt weiterhin mit, zum gegenwärtigen Zeitpunkt keine Maßnahmen zur Entfernung der verleumdenden Inhalte ergreifen zu wollen. Fortsetzung folgt.

Quelle: GoMoPa (www.gomopa.net / Siegfried Siewert)

siehe:

http://www.victims-opfer.com/?p=17528

DER “SPIEGEL” ÜBER “GoMoPa” FÜR SCHÜLER “ISHAREGOSSIP”

http://www.spiegel.de/netzwelt/web/0,1518,768477,00.html

(RUF)MÖRDER STASI “GoMoPa” und Peter Ehlers auf der Flucht vor der Wahrheit und der Justiz

EANS-News: Statement of Magister Bernd Pulch

London (euro adhoc) – My name is Bernd Pulch, I have studied and
acquired the title Master (Magister) according to the academic laws.

Link to my Master´s thesis

http://www.kepplinger.de/search/node/pulch

and

http://www.kepplinger.de/node/50

I am the heir of the family bible and can therefore represent our
family based on this authority.

My family, my friends and I have be stalked in the internet and real
life, blackmailed and threatened by the serial criminals of “GoMoPa” which is an anonymous company with no real persons responsable and a fake impressum. They want to stop my reports about them.

Even the name Goldman, Morgenstern & Partners is a fake. These persons have never existed as members of “GoMoPa”, the criminal organisation. All news of them are fakes.

Therefore we have informed the police. The relevant cases are in
Wiesbaden ( ST/0148943/2011), Hamburg (2100 Js 1108 / 10) and Berlin
(110228-0831-037199)

All activities seem to be in connection with the so called Finance
Agency of “GoMoPa” which has already been sued by many persons and
companies for example by Wirecard and Meridian Capital.

Our family has and had many members who work and worked successfully
as entrepreneurs, secretaries of state, banker, lawyers, farmers,
politicians and also journalists.

We will prevent that our family name is violated.

I will therefore prosecute these criminals with the help of the
police. Magister Bernd Pulch London

end of announcement euro adhoc
——————————————————————————–

Copy of my Bacherlor of Arts document

Further inquiry note:

Bernd Pulch

General Global Media Ltd

London

office@generalglobalmedia.com

Read the press about it

STATEMENT MAGISTER PULCH 19.4.2011

EANS-News: Stellungnahme von Magister Bernd Pulch

 

 

 

London (euro adhoc) – Mein Name ist Magister Bernd Pulch.

Ich wende mich an die Öffentlichkeit als Reaktion darauf, das meine Person und Familienangehörige im Internet auf übelste Art und Weise auf verschiedenen Webseiten, die alle den gleichen Ursprung haben, diffamiert und verleumdet wird.

Weiterhin sind Personen aus meinem Umfeld angerufen und mit diesen Beleidigungen und Diffamierungen konfrontiert worden, erpresst und bedroht worden.

Wir haben mehrere Strafanzeigen gegen die Täter in Wiesbaden ( ST/0148943/2011), Hamburg (2100 Js 1108 / 10) und Berlin (110228-0831-037199) erstattet; die polizeilichen Ermittlungen können jedoch nicht auf eine u.a. auch in den USA angemeldete Website verfolgt werden.

Das Geschäft dieser Leute ist es, ehrliche Kauf- und Geschäftsleute durch Diffamierung zu erpressen. Das dieses keinen Erfolg bei mir haben wird steht außer Frage; und dieses wird durch die jetzige Klarstellung unterstrichen.

Zur weiteren Information: In diesem Zusammenhang ist u.a. das sogenannte Nachrichtenportal ´GoMoPa´ zu nennen. Dort sind u.a. wegen Betruges mehrfach vorbestrafte Leute wie ein Herr Klaus Maurischat in leitender Position tätig. Das Impressum von „GoMoPa“ weist keine einzige natürliche Person auf, sondern nur eine Briefkastenadresse in New York.

Die „Berichte“ in „GoMoPa“ sind ohne jeden Beweis und arbeiten mit falschen Behauptungen, deswegen gibt es auch keine Person, die offen für „GoMoPa“ eintritt und eine zustellbare Adresse aufweist.

Der Name Goldman, Morgenstern und Partner ist gleichfalls frei erfunden und soll New Yorker Anwälte suggerieren. Dabei ist die Webseite von „GoMoPa“ ausschliesslich in deutscher Sprache und über 90% der Besucher kommen aus Deutschlands. Nach Recherchen der Wirtschaftskanzle Juricon sind die führenden Köpfe serienmässig vorbestraft und haben eine STASI-Vergangenheit.

Gegen dieses Portal wurde bereits ebenfalls von vielen Seiten Strafanzeige erstattet wie u.a. von den Firmen Wirecard und Meridian Capital.

Ich danke allen Personen die mir weitere Hinweise geben können und damit helfen, der perfiden Internet Kampagne dieser Straftäter ein Ende zu bereiten.

Magister Bernd Pulch

London , im April 2011

Ende der Mitteilung

——————————————————————————–

Kopie meiner Magister-Urkunde

Rückfragehinweis:

Magister Bernd Pulch

General Global Media Limited

London

office@generalglobalmedia.com

Hier die Pressedokumentation

STATEMENT MAGISTER PULCH 19.4.2011

DAS BETRUGSURTEIL GEGEN DAS-INVESTMENT-PETER-EHLERS-PARTNER-“GoMoPa”

Der Beweis: Betrugs-Urteil gegen„GoMoPa“-Maurischat:  Betrug am eigenen Anleger wg € 10.000,-(Investment Magazin, Investment, Das Investment) DAS ORIGINAL – Über eine selbstgebaute Blogseite verbreiten die GoMoPa-Gangster eine gefälschte Stellung von Meridian Capital, um Verwirrung zu stiften.

Diese Blogseite existiert erst seit Dezember 2010.
Beweis:
http://www.hypestat.com/pressreleaser.org
Die Meridian Capital-Seite, das Original,
http://othergomopa.blogspot.com/
ist dagegen bereits seit2009 online
Beweis: Aussage Meridian Capital – das Unternehmen können Sie auch gerne direkt kontaktieren.
und
KLAUS DIETER MAURISCHAT IN DETENTION
Source: http://klaus-dieter-maurischat.blogspot.com/2009/01/klaus-dieter-maurischat-in-haft.html
Hintergrund: Die Verurteilung von Klaus Maurischat und Mark Vornkahl wegen Betruges am eigenen Anleger

 

und

 

http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:8jmni-h2e_4J:www.maurischatinhaft.wordpress.com/+verhaftung+klaus+maurischat&cd=2&hl=de&ct=clnk&gl=de&source=www.google.de

Klaus Maurischat und Mark Vornkahl, Betreiber vonwww.gomopa.net: Am 24. April 2006 war die Verhandlung am Amtsgericht Krefeld in der Betrugssache: Mark Vornkahl / Klaus Maurischat ./. Dehnfeld. Aktenzeichen: 28 Ls 85/05 Klaus MaurischatLange Straße 3827313 Dörverden.Das in diesem Verfahren ausschließlich diese Betrugsache verhandelt wurde, ist das Urteil gegen Klaus Maurischat recht mäßig ausgefallen.Zusammenfassung der Verhandlung vom 24.04.2006 vor dem Schöffengericht des AG Krefeld in der Sache gegen Klaus Maurischat und Mark Vornkahl.Zur Hauptverhandlung erschienen:Richter Dr. Meister, 2 Schöffen,Staatsanwalt, Angeklagter Klaus Maurischat, vertr. durch RA Meier, Berlin; aus der U-Haft zur Verhandlung überführt.1. Eine Gerichtsvollzieherin stellt unter Ausschuss der Öffentlichkeit eine Urkunde an den Angeklagten Maurischat zu.2. Bei Mark Vornkahl wurde im Gerichtssaal eineTaschenpfändung vorgenommen.Beginn der HauptverhandlungDie Beklagten verzichten auf eine Einlassung zu Beginn.Nach Befragung des Zeugen Denfeld zum Sachverhalt wurde dieVerhandlung auf Wunsch der Staatsanwaltschaft und den Verteidigern unterbrochen.Der Angeklagte Maurischat gab nach Fortsetzung derHauptverhandlung Folgendes zu Protokoll:Er sähe ein, dass das Geld auf das falsche Konto gegangen sei und nicht dem eigentlichen Verwendungszweck zugeführt wurde. Das Geld sei aber zurückgezahlt worden und er distanziere sich ausdrücklich von einem Betrug.Schließung der BeweisaufnahmeDer Staatsanwalt verließt sein PlädoyerEr halte am Vorwurf des Betruges fest. Mit Hinweis auf die einschlägigen Vorstrafen des Angekl. Maurischatund auf laufende Ermittlungsverfahren, beantrage er ein Strafmaß von 1 Jahr und 6 Monaten.Er halte dem Angeklagten zu Gute, dass dieserWiedergutmachung geleistet habe, und dass dieser geständig war. Zudem läge die letzte Verurteilung wegen Betruges 11 Jahre zurück. Auch sei der Geschädigte nicht in existentielle Not geraten, wobei der Staatsanwalt nicht über noch laufende Verfahren hinweg sehen könne. Er läge aber dem Angeklagten Maurischat nahe, keine weiteren Aktivitäten im Bezirk der Staatsanwaltschaft Krefeld auszuüben, insbesondere möchte er, dass keine weiteren Anleger im Bezirk der Staatsanwaltschaft Krefeld durch GoMoPa akquiriert werden.Die Freiheitsstrafe soll zur Bewährung ausgesetzt werden.Plädoyer des Verteidigers des Angekl. Maurischat, Herrn RA MeierEr schließe sich, wie (in der Unterbrechung) vereinbart, dem Staatsanwalt an.Es stimme, dass sein Mandant Fehler in seiner Vergangenheit gemacht habe, und dass er auch diesmal einen Fehler begangen haben könnte, jedoch sei der Hinweis wichtig, dass sein Mandant aus diesen Fehlern gelernt habe.Der Angeklagte haben das letzte Wort.Maurischat sagt, es sei bereits alles gesagt worden.Unterbrechung zu Hauptverhandlung. Der Richter zieht sich mit den Schöffen zur Beratung zurück.Urteilsverkündung:Der Angeklagte wird des gemeinschaftlichen Betrugs für schuldig befunden.Der Angeklagte Klaus Maurischat wird zu einerFreiheitsstrafe von 1 Jahr und 6 Monaten verurteilt. Diese wird zur Bewährung ausgesetzt.Die Bewährungszeit wird auf 3 Jahre festgesetzt.Der Haftbefehl gegen Klaus Maurischat wird aufgehoben.Der Angeklagte trage die Kosten des Verfahrens.UrteilsbegründungDer Richter erklärt, dass eine Täuschung des Geschädigtenvorliegt und somit keine Untreue in Betracht kommen kann.Die Fragen, ob es sich um einen Anlagebetrug handele sei irrelevant. Er hält den Angeklagten die geleistete Wiedergutmachung zu Gute.Ebenso ist das Geständnis für die Angeklagten zu werten. Zudem liegt die letzte Verurteilung des Angeklagten Maurischat 11 Jahre zurück.Die Parteien verzichten auf Rechtsmittel. Das Urteil ist somit rechtskräftig.Mit dem heutigen Urteil endet ein Kapitel in derBetrugssache Goldman Morgenstern & Partners, Klaus Maurischat und Mark Vornkahl.Alle GoMoPa.net Verantwortlichen, Maurischat, Vornkahl und Henneberg sind nun vorbestrafte Abzocker und Betrüger und die Zukunft der Pseudoklitsche GoMoPa.net sieht duster aus.Mir dem Geständnis der beiden ABZOCKER MAURISCHAT UND VORNKAHL vor Gericht bricht ein jahrelangaufrechterhaltenes Lügengeflecht von einigen primitiven Betrügern zusammen. Gewohnheitsverbrecher und Denunzianten,die rechtschaffene Personen und Firmen in ihren Verbrecherforen kriminalisierten.

SÜDDEUTSCHE ZEITUNG ÜBER DIE ERPRESSER- UND RUFMORD-METHODE VON DAS-INVESTMENT PETER EHLERS PARTNER “GoMoPa”

SZ_03.09.2010_Am_virtuellen_Pranger

WikiLeaks: Chinas Propaganda-Chef hinter Attacken auf Google

DAS ZDF ÜBER DAS-INVESTMENT-“PETER EHLERS”-PARTNER VON DER FINGIERTEN “GoMoPA”

http://www.zdf.de/ZDFmediathek/beitrag/video/1210400/Betrueger-Ein-Aussteiger-packt-aus#/beitrag/video/1210400/Betrueger-Ein-Aussteiger-packt-aus

Opfer: mehr als 3.600 Personen und Firmen von der fingierten “GoMoPa” gestalkt und erpresst

http://www.victims-opfer.com/?page_id=15672

GEGEN STALKER “GoMoPa”: Studie zum Tatort Internet :Jeder Dritte wurde schon gemobbt

http://www.bild.de/digital/internet/mobbing/jeder-dritte-jugendliche-wird-gemobbt-18298774.bild.html

BÖRSE ONLINE ÜBER DAS-INVESTMENT-PETER-EHLERS-PARTNER VON DER KRIMINELLEN “GoMoPa”

BoerseOnline_Nr38_16.09.2010_Wo_gehobelt_wird

JURICON ÜBER DAS INVESTMENT-PETER EHLERS PARTNER DER FINGIERTEN “GoMoPa” MIT STASI-CONNECTIONS

anlage_8_gomopa_abzocker.com_info

 

anlage_9_gomopa_gesellschaftsmuell.com

 

anlage_10_juricon_internet_bericht_ber_gomopa

 

MUTMASSLICHER TITELBETRUG: DARUM LÄSST UNS PETER EHLERS VON SEINEN PARTNERN DER “GoMoPa” STALKEN: SEIT 2000 HABEN WIR DEN TITEL INVESTMENT AUCH IN DEUTSCHLAND

Die Anregung von Gruner & Jahr Tochter, IPV,  ”INVESTMENT” in Deutschland zu gründen

download

Hier gibt Peter Ehlers selber zu, dass sein “Magazin” bis 2006 “Der Fonds” hiess:

Weitere Infos:

https://berndpulch.org/2011/04/17/der-beweis-das-investment-magazin-das-original/

FINANCIAL TIMES ÜBER “DAS INVESTMENT”s PETER EHLERS” KRIMINELLE PARTNER VON “GoMoPa”

ftd logo SJB GoMoPa Presse LoungeFinancial Times Deutschland schreibt über Gomopa

_____________________________________

In der Druckversion der FTD erschien am 28.12.2010 dieser Artikel.

Gomopa-Wonach der Markt lechzt

Der Finanznachrichtendienst Gomopa will künftig ein Seriositätsrating von Anbietern am grauen Kapitalmarkt veröffentlichen –dabei ist das Unternehmen selbst umstritten

Bei Beteiligungsmodellen haben Anleger die Qual der Wahl: Sind die tollen Prognosen von Anbieter A glaubwürdig? Oder wäre vielleicht B mit den bodenständigeren Erwartungen vertrauenswürdiger? Es gibt zwar jede Menge Ratings und Siegel, wirklich hilfreich sind viele aber nicht.

Man müsse hinter 95 Prozent der Ratings Gefälligkeitsgutachten vermuten, meint gar Klaus Maurischat, Chef des Finanzinformationsdienstes Goldman Morgenstern & Partners (Gomopa) aus New York, in einem Schreiben an Premiumnutzer seines Dienstes. Schmückende und verkaufsfördernde Ratings oder andere Bewertungen würden von denUnternehmungen bezahlt oder gesponsert, erläutert er. Das führe zu Interessenkonflikten.

Gomopa bereite daher ein Angebot vor, „nach dem der Markt förmlich lechzt“: ein Seriositätsrating, das den Markt revolutionieren und auch noch „mindestens sichere 20% jährliche Rendite an die Gründungsmitglieder“ abwerfen soll. Das System bewerte neutral und unbeeinflussbar „mathematisch, nach festen Algorithmen und Parametern die Seriosität einesUnternehmens und des dahinterstehenden Unternehmers“.

Daraus ergebe sich tabellarisch ein Ranking nach dem Ampelsystem. Das Rating münde in einer Zahl zwischen 100 und 10 000. Sie zeige die Wahrscheinlichkeit eines positiven Geschäftsausgangs mit dem zu bewertenden Anbieter an. Bei 9067 würden zum Beispiel zu 90,67 Prozent „die Aussagen des Anbieters erfüllt werden“.

Beim Rating zählten in erster Linie nachweisbare Leistungen in der Vergangenheit, erläutert Maurischat. Meldungen und Nachrichten würden berücksichtigt und die Werthaltigkeit geprüft. Bei Fondsinhalten sei das nicht nötig. „Die komplizierten Abhandlungen versteht im Endeffekt der eigentliche Verbraucher sowieso nicht“, findet der Gomopa-Chef. Das Rating seimit anerkannten Systemen und Datenbanken wie der Schufa und Google vernetzt. Änderten sich Parameter dort, schlage sich sofort das Ergebnis und Ranking bei Gomopa nieder.

Das wirft allerdings jede Menge Fragen auf. Wie wird etwa die Werthaltigkeit von Informationen bei Google mit einem solchen Ansatz erfasst? Wie geht das System mit neuen Anbietern um oder mit bislang als seriös bekannten Anbietern, die ein offensichtlich schlechtes Produkt auflegen? Maurischat antwortete auf Anfrage, er werde nichts zu internen Geschäftsabläufen mitteilen.

Unter dem Namen Gomopa-Rating soll das Angebot allerdings nicht an den Start gehen, schreibt Maurischat den Nutzern, sondern über eine US-Tochter. Das wiederum ist sehr gut nachvollziehbar. Denn über Goldmann Morgenstern &

Partners selbst gab es in der Vergangenheit auch ziemlich negative Meldungen und Nachrichten. Im Herbst wurde zum Beispiel bekannt, dass sich die Staatsanwaltschaft München für Maurischat und einen Gomopa-Kollegen interessiert, weil der Dienst im Frühjahr falsche Informationen zum TecDAX-Unternehmen Wirecard veröffentlicht hatte und der Aktienkurs abgestürzt war. Bei Gomopa selbst fiele der Seriositätsindex damit wohl nicht so vorteilhaft aus.

Kommentar: WIESO STELLEN SICH “GoMoPa” PARTNER Jochen Resch, Gerd Bennewirtz und Peter Ehlers nicht der Kritik

WIE GOMOPA DIE FONDSBRANCHE ÜBERNEHMEN WILL

FRANKFURTER ALLGEMEINE ZEITUNG ÜBER “PETER EHLERS” KRIMINELLE PARTNER VON “GoMoPa” UND CSYBERSTALKING

http://www.faz.net/artikel/C30350/wirtschaftskriminalitaet-grossrazzia-wegen-verdachts-auf-insiderhandel-30309286.html

http://www.faz.net/artikel/C30857/cyberstalking-im-netz-30321544.html

JETZT IST ES ERWIESEN: “PETER EHLERS”, “Das Investment”, STASI “GoMoPa” und RA “RESCH” sowie STASI OBERST STELZER STECKEN UNTER EINER DECKE

siehe

http://www.victims-opfer.com/

und

http://www.victims-opfer.com/?page_id=11764

Experten sagen: “Eindeutig der Designer ist ein und derselbe D(DDR)ESIGNER und benutzt sogar die identische Farbskala siehe hier die Juni-Ausgaben der

DDR-Postillen

Juni-Ausgabe “Das Investment” früher “Der Fonds”

LG

Martin G.

Graphiker

HANDELSBLATT ÜBER DIE KRIMINELLEN PARTNER VON DAS INVESTMENT-PETER PETHER EHLERS

SÜDDEUTSCHE ZEITUNG ÜBER “PETER EHLERS” KRIMINELLE PARTNER VON DER FINGIERTEN “GoMoPa”

SZ_03.09.2010_Am_virtuellen_Pranger

BÖRSE ONLINE ÜBER “PETER EHLERS” KRIMINELLE PARTNER DER FINGIERTEN “GoMoPa”

BoerseOnline_Nr38_16.09.2010_Wo_gehobelt_wird

 

http://www.graumarktinfo.de/gm/aktuell/diskussion/:Gomopa–Anwaelte-als-Finanzierungsquelle/616477.html

FINANCIAL TIMES ÜBER DIE KRIMINELLEN PARTNER VON “PETER EHLERS”, DIE FINGIERTEN “GoMoPa”

ftd logo SJB GoMoPa Presse Lounge

Financial Times Deutschland schreibt über Gomopa

 

_____________________________________

 

In der Druckversion der FTD erschien am 28.12.2010 dieser Artikel.

 

Gomopa-Wonach der Markt lechzt

 

Der Finanznachrichtendienst Gomopa will künftig ein Seriositätsrating von Anbietern am grauen Kapitalmarkt veröffentlichen –dabei ist das Unternehmen selbst umstritten

 

Bei Beteiligungsmodellen haben Anleger die Qual der Wahl: Sind die tollen Prognosen von Anbieter A glaubwürdig? Oder wäre vielleicht B mit den bodenständigeren Erwartungen vertrauenswürdiger? Es gibt zwar jede Menge Ratings und Siegel, wirklich hilfreich sind viele aber nicht.

 

Man müsse hinter 95 Prozent der Ratings Gefälligkeitsgutachten vermuten, meint gar Klaus Maurischat, Chef des Finanzinformationsdienstes Goldman Morgenstern & Partners (Gomopa) aus New York, in einem Schreiben an Premiumnutzer seines Dienstes. Schmückende und verkaufsfördernde Ratings oder andere Bewertungen würden von denUnternehmungen bezahlt oder gesponsert, erläutert er. Das führe zu Interessenkonflikten.

 

Gomopa bereite daher ein Angebot vor, „nach dem der Markt förmlich lechzt“: ein Seriositätsrating, das den Markt revolutionieren und auch noch „mindestens sichere 20% jährliche Rendite an die Gründungsmitglieder“ abwerfen soll. Das System bewerte neutral und unbeeinflussbar „mathematisch, nach festen Algorithmen und Parametern die Seriosität einesUnternehmens und des dahinterstehenden Unternehmers“.

 

Daraus ergebe sich tabellarisch ein Ranking nach dem Ampelsystem. Das Rating münde in einer Zahl zwischen 100 und 10 000. Sie zeige die Wahrscheinlichkeit eines positiven Geschäftsausgangs mit dem zu bewertenden Anbieter an. Bei 9067 würden zum Beispiel zu 90,67 Prozent „die Aussagen des Anbieters erfüllt werden“.

 

Beim Rating zählten in erster Linie nachweisbare Leistungen in der Vergangenheit, erläutert Maurischat. Meldungen und Nachrichten würden berücksichtigt und die Werthaltigkeit geprüft. Bei Fondsinhalten sei das nicht nötig. „Die komplizierten Abhandlungen versteht im Endeffekt der eigentliche Verbraucher sowieso nicht“, findet der Gomopa-Chef. Das Rating seimit anerkannten Systemen und Datenbanken wie der Schufa und Google vernetzt. Änderten sich Parameter dort, schlage sich sofort das Ergebnis und Ranking bei Gomopa nieder.

Das wirft allerdings jede Menge Fragen auf. Wie wird etwa die Werthaltigkeit von Informationen bei Google mit einem solchen Ansatz erfasst? Wie geht das System mit neuen Anbietern um oder mit bislang als seriös bekannten Anbietern, die ein offensichtlich schlechtes Produkt auflegen? Maurischat antwortete auf Anfrage, er werde nichts zu internen Geschäftsabläufen mitteilen.

 

Unter dem Namen Gomopa-Rating soll das Angebot allerdings nicht an den Start gehen, schreibt Maurischat den Nutzern, sondern über eine US-Tochter. Das wiederum ist sehr gut nachvollziehbar. Denn über Goldmann Morgenstern &

Partners selbst gab es in der Vergangenheit auch ziemlich negative Meldungen und Nachrichten. Im Herbst wurde zum Beispiel bekannt, dass sich die Staatsanwaltschaft München für Maurischat und einen Gomopa-Kollegen interessiert, weil der Dienst im Frühjahr falsche Informationen zum TecDAX-Unternehmen Wirecard veröffentlicht hatte und der Aktienkurs abgestürzt war. Bei Gomopa selbst fiele der Seriositätsindex damit wohl nicht so vorteilhaft aus.

DIE ECHTEN MERIDIAN CAPITAL INFOS ZU DEN FINGIERTEN “GoMoPa”, PETER EHLERS KRIMINELLEN PARTNERN

Liebe Leser,

hier die Original-Stellungnahme von Meridian Capital:

http://meridiancapital.wordpress.com

http://meridiancapital.blogspot.com/2011/04/meridian-capital-klaus-dieter.html

http://www.immobilien-vertraulich.com/law/7129-bericht-von-meridian-capital-ueber-die-verhaftung-von-gomopa-chef-klaus-maurischat-durch-das-bka-in-berlin-.html

Hier der Artikel von “GoMoPa” über Meridian Capital.

http://www.investment-on.com/Investment-Magazin/der-beweis-erpressungsversuch-des-nachrichtendienstes-gomopa-an-meridian-capital.html

Hier die Hintergründe der Erpressung:

http://www.immobilien-vertraulich.com/law/7154-opfer-nach-immovation-und-estavis-versucht-gomopa-nun-dkb-zu-erpressen-gomopa-hintermann-ra-resch.html

Mit Ihren STASI-Methoden wie z.B. gefälschten Pressemitteilungen von uns bzw. Meridian Capital wollen die “GoMoPa”-STASI-Verbrecher die Wahrheit unterdrücken.

Das wird Ihnen nicht gelingen.

 

Herzlichst Ihr

Magister Bernd Pulch
PS Rufen Sie doch auch einfach mal bei Meridian Capital an und fragen nach…

 

 

HANDELSBLATT ÜBER PETER EHLERS KRIMINELLE PARTNER VON DER STASI “GoMoPa” AUCH ALS “PRESSRELEASER” TÄTIG

http://www.handelsblatt.com/finanzen/boerse-maerkte/boerse-inside/finanzaufsicht-untersucht-kursachterbahn-bei-wirecard/3406252.html

FRANKFURTER ALLGEMEINE ZEITUNG ÜBER PETER EHLERS PARTNER DER KRIMINELLEN “GoMoPa”

http://www.faz.net/artikel/C30350/wirtschaftskriminalitaet-grossrazzia-wegen-verdachts-auf-insiderhandel-30309286.html

http://www.faz.net/artikel/C30857/cyberstalking-im-netz-30321544.html

RUFMORD DER “GoMoP” MUTMASSLICH IM AUFTRAG VON PETER EHLERS, WEIL WIR DEN TITEL INVESTMENT SEIT 2000 haben

download

Korrespondenz, die zur Einführung des Titels “INVESTMENT” in Deutschland im jahre 2000 durch mich und unser Haus führte

 

Meine Magister-Urkunde

 

Bestätigung von Peter Ehlers, das sein Titel bis 2006 “Der Fonds” hiess

https://berndpulch.org/bernd-pulch-der-beweis-%E2%80%93-so-wollte-der-serienbetruger-klaus-maurischat-uns-zwingen-die-berichterstattung-uber-den-%E2%80%9Cnachrichtendienst%E2%80%9D-%E2%80%9Cgomopa%E2%80%9D-einzustellen/

Drohmail von “GoMoPa” im Auftrag von mutmasslich Peter Ehlers

MUTMASSLICHER TITELBETRUG: DARUM LÄSST UNS PETER EHLERS VON SEINEN PARTNERN DER “GoMoPa” STALKEN: SEIT 2000 HABEN WIR DEN TITEL INVESTMENT AUCH IN DEUTSCHLAND

Die Anregung von Gruner & Jahr Tochter, IPV,  ”INVESTMENT” in Deutschland zu gründen

download

Hier gibt Peter Ehlers selber zu, dass sein “Magazin” bis 2006 “Der Fonds” hiess:

Weitere Infos:

https://berndpulch.org/2011/04/17/der-beweis-das-investment-magazin-das-original/

ÜBERFÜHRT: MUTMASSLICHER TITELBETRÜGER UND RUFMÖRDER “PETER EHLERS”,

download

Die Anregung von Gruner & Jahr Tochter, IPV,  ”INVESTMENT” in Deutschland zu gründen siehe oben im Download-Original-E-Mail

Hier gibt Peter Ehlers selber zu, dass sein “Magazin” bis 2006 “Der Fonds” hiess…

Weitere Infos:

https://berndpulch.org/2011/04/17/der-beweis-das-investment-magazin-das-original/

BÖRSE ONLINE ÜBER PETER EHLERS PARTNER, DIE MÖRDERISCH BETRÜGERISCHEN “GoMoPa”

BoerseOnline_Nr38_16.09.2010_Wo_gehobelt_wird

TITELBETRUG: DARUM LÄSST UNS PETER EHLERS VON SEINEN PARTNER DER “GoMoPa” STALKEN: SEIT 2000 HABEN WIR DEN TITEL INVESTMENT IN DEUTSCHLAND

download

Die Anregung von Gruner & Jahr Tochter, IPV,  ”INVESTMENT” in Deutschland zu gründen siehe oben im Download-Original-E-Mail

Hier gibt Peter Ehlers selber zu, dass sein “Magazin” bis 2006 “Der Fonds” hiess…

Weitere Infos:

https://berndpulch.org/2011/04/17/der-beweis-das-investment-magazin-das-original/

DIE LISTE DER OPFER DER MÖRDERISCH BETRÜGERISCHEN “GoMoPa”, PETER EHLERS PARTNERN

http://www.victims-opfer.com/?page_id=15672

Sehr geehrte Herren mutmassliche (Ruf)mörder Peter Ehlers und Partner „GoMoPa“

Sehr geehrte mutmassliche Herren (Ruf)mörder,

diese Mail hat Ihnen noch niemand geschrieben- weil einige Leute wohl vorher mutmasslich ermordet wurden und/oder eingeschüchtert worden sind.

Ich darf  Ihnen, mutmassliche Herren (Ruf)mörder mitteilen MIT MIR NICHT

UND ICH DARF SIE INFORMIEREN

Sie werden den  “Reality Check” erleben.

Magister Berd Pulch

HANDELSBLATT ÜBER DIE VERBRECHEN VON PETER EHLERS’ PARTNER, DEN FINGIERTEN “GoMoPa”BLATT

http://www.handelsblatt.com/finanzen/boerse-maerkte/boerse-inside/finanzaufsicht-untersucht-kursachterbahn-bei-wirecard/3406252.html

FRANKFURTER ALLGEMEINE ZEITUNG ÜBER PETER EHLERS’ PARTNER, DIE FINGIERTEN “GoMoPa”

http://www.faz.net/artikel/C30857/cyberstalking-im-netz-30321544.html

http://www.faz.net/artikel/C30350/wirtschaftskriminalitaet-grossrazzia-wegen-verdachts-auf-insiderhandel-30309286.html

DAS KINDERPORTAL VON PETER EHLERS’ PARTNERN, DEN FINGIERTEN “GOMoPa” MIT “SEXUALERZIEHUNG”

http://investmentmagazin.com/?p=1751

DAS URTEIL GEGEN PETER EHLERS’ PARTNER, DIE FINGIERTEN “GOMoPa”- BETRÜGER, KLAUS MAURISCHAT u. MARK VORNKAHL WG BETRUGES AM EIGENEN ANLEGER

http://www.immobilien-vertraulich.com/law/7273-der-beweis-betrugs-urteil-gegengomopa-maurischat-betrug-am-eigenen-anleger-wg–10000-.html

MAGISTER-URKUNDE BERND PULCH – FÜRUNG DES TITELS MAGISTER – PRESSE

FÜHRUNG DES TITELS MAGISTER

http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Akademischer_Grad

PRESSEBERICHTERSTATTUNG

https://berndpulch.org/about/

DER BEWEIS AUS DEM JAHR 2000: SO REGTE GRUNER und JAHR-TOCHTER, IPV, MICH AN, DEN TITEL “INVESTMENT” ZU LANCIEREN

download

DER BEWEIS AUS DEM JAHR 2000: SO REGTE GRUNER & JAHR-TOCHTER, IPV, MICH AN, DEN TITEL “INVESTMENT” AUCH IN DEUTSCHLAND  ZU LANCIEREN. DESHALB  HAT “PETER HLERS” MUTMASSLICH “GoMoPa” BEAUFTRAGT, MICH AUSZUSCHALTEN.

DANN HABE ICH ÜBER “GoMoPa” UND IHRE MUTMASSLICHEN PARTNER “PETER EHLERS” UND “GERD BENNEWIRTZ” RECHERCHIERT…

Original STELLUNGNAHME VON MERIDIAN CAPITAL ZU “GoMoPa”

Original STELLUNGNAHME VON MERIDIAN CAPITAL ZU “GoMoPa”

Liebe Leser,

hier die Original-Stellungnahme von Meridian Capital:

http://meridiancapital.wordpress.com

http://www.immobilien-vertraulich.com/law/7129-bericht-von-meridian-capital-ueber-die-verhaftung-von-gomopa-chef-klaus-maurischat-durch-das-bka-in-berlin-.html

Hier der Artikel von “GoMoPa” über Meridian Capital.

http://www.investment-on.com/Investment-Magazin/der-beweis-erpressungsversuch-des-nachrichtendienstes-gomopa-an-meridian-capital.html

Hier die Hintergründe der Erpressung:

http://www.immobilien-vertraulich.com/law/7154-opfer-nach-immovation-und-estavis-versucht-gomopa-nun-dkb-zu-erpressen-gomopa-hintermann-ra-resch.html

Mit Ihren STASI-MEthoden wollen die “GoMoPa”-STASI-Verbrecher die Wahrheit unterdrücken.

Das wird Ihnen nicht gelingen.

MAGISTER BERND PULCH: HIER IST MEINE MAGISTERURKUNDE: WO GIBT ES URKUNDEN VON “PETER EHLERS” UND SEINER “GoMoPa”

SÜDDEUTSCHE ZEITUNG ÜBER DIE VERBRECHEN DER FINGIERTEN “GoMoPa” u. STASI MA-LISTE

SZ_03.09.2010_Am_virtuellen_Pranger

Handelsblatt über die kriminellen “GoMoPa”-Betrüger

http://www.handelsblatt.com/finanzen/boerse-maerkte/boerse-inside/finanzaufsicht-untersucht-kursachterbahn-bei-wirecard/3406252.html

DAS DOSSIER ÜBER DIE FINGIERTE “GoMoPa” SAMT SERIENBETRÜGEREIEN UND STASI-BEZUG

Juricon über “GoMoPa” inklusive STASI-Verbindung

anlage_8_gomopa_abzocker.com_info

anlage_9_gomopa_gesellschaftsmuell.com

anlage_10_juricon_internet_bericht_ber_gomopa

Das vernichtende Urteil der deutschen Presse über “GoMoPa”

Presseberichterstatung-zu-Maurischat1

FRANKFURTER ALLGEMEINE ZEITUNG ÜBER DIE SERIENBETRÜGER DER “GoMoPa” UND IHR AUFTRAGS-CYBERSTALKING WIE FÜR MUTMASSLICH “PETER EHLERS” UND “GERD BENNEWIRTZ”

http://www.faz.net/s/RubEC1ACFE1EE274C81BCD3621EF555C83C/Doc~EB5651ECDC72949FF907D2CA89D5AFE72~ATpl~Ecommon~Scontent.html

http://www.faz.net/s/Rub77CAECAE94D7431F9EACD163751D4CFD/Doc~E70F3E028C8E542D9B0AD6B2A8B1179C3~ATpl~Ecommon~Scontent.html

STATEMENT MAGISTER BERND PULCH GEGEN VORBESTRAFTE CYBERSTALKER DER FINGIERTEN “GoMoPa” UND ZU GOOGLE-BEIHILFE

EANS-News: Statement of Magister Bernd Pulch

London (euro adhoc) – My name is Bernd Pulch, I have studied and
acquired the title Master (Magister) according to the academic laws.

Link to my Master´s thesis

http://www.kepplinger.de/search/node/pulch

and

http://www.kepplinger.de/node/50

I am the heir of the family bible and can therefore represent our
family based on this authority.

My family, my friends and I have be stalked in the internet and real
life, blackmailed and threatened by the serial criminals of “GoMoPa” which is an anonymous company with no real persons responsable and a fake impressum. They want to stop my reports about them.

Even the name Goldman, Morgenstern & Partners is a fake. These persons have never existed as members of “GoMoPa”, the criminal organisation. All news of them are fakes.

Therefore we have informed the police. The relevant cases are in
Wiesbaden ( ST/0148943/2011), Hamburg (2100 Js 1108 / 10) and Berlin
(110228-0831-037199)

All activities seem to be in connection with the so called Finance
Agency of “GoMoPa” which has already been sued by many persons and
companies for example by Wirecard and Meridian Capital.

Our family has and had many members who work and worked successfully
as entrepreneurs, secretaries of state, banker, lawyers, farmers,
politicians and also journalists.

We will prevent that our family name is violated.

I will therefore prosecute these criminals with the help of the
police. Magister Bernd Pulch London

end of announcement euro adhoc
——————————————————————————–

Copy of my Bacherlor of Arts document

Further inquiry note:

Bernd Pulch

General Global Media Ltd

London

office@generalglobalmedia.com

Read the press about it

STATEMENT MAGISTER PULCH 19.4.2011

EANS-News: Stellungnahme von Magister Bernd Pulch

 

 

 

London (euro adhoc) – Mein Name ist Magister Bernd Pulch.

Ich wende mich an die Öffentlichkeit als Reaktion darauf, das meine Person und Familienangehörige im Internet auf übelste Art und Weise auf verschiedenen Webseiten, die alle den gleichen Ursprung haben, diffamiert und verleumdet wird.

Weiterhin sind Personen aus meinem Umfeld angerufen und mit diesen Beleidigungen und Diffamierungen konfrontiert worden, erpresst und bedroht worden.

Wir haben mehrere Strafanzeigen gegen die Täter in Wiesbaden ( ST/0148943/2011), Hamburg (2100 Js 1108 / 10) und Berlin (110228-0831-037199) erstattet; die polizeilichen Ermittlungen können jedoch nicht auf eine u.a. auch in den USA angemeldete Website verfolgt werden.

Das Geschäft dieser Leute ist es, ehrliche Kauf- und Geschäftsleute durch Diffamierung zu erpressen. Das dieses keinen Erfolg bei mir haben wird steht außer Frage; und dieses wird durch die jetzige Klarstellung unterstrichen.

Zur weiteren Information: In diesem Zusammenhang ist u.a. das sogenannte Nachrichtenportal ´GoMoPa´ zu nennen. Dort sind u.a. wegen Betruges mehrfach vorbestrafte Leute wie ein Herr Klaus Maurischat in leitender Position tätig. Das Impressum von „GoMoPa“ weist keine einzige natürliche Person auf, sondern nur eine Briefkastenadresse in New York.

Die „Berichte“ in „GoMoPa“ sind ohne jeden Beweis und arbeiten mit falschen Behauptungen, deswegen gibt es auch keine Person, die offen für „GoMoPa“ eintritt und eine zustellbare Adresse aufweist.

Der Name Goldman, Morgenstern und Partner ist gleichfalls frei erfunden und soll New Yorker Anwälte suggerieren. Dabei ist die Webseite von „GoMoPa“ ausschliesslich in deutscher Sprache und über 90% der Besucher kommen aus Deutschlands. Nach Recherchen der Wirtschaftskanzle Juricon sind die führenden Köpfe serienmässig vorbestraft und haben eine STASI-Vergangenheit.

Gegen dieses Portal wurde bereits ebenfalls von vielen Seiten Strafanzeige erstattet wie u.a. von den Firmen Wirecard und Meridian Capital.

Ich danke allen Personen die mir weitere Hinweise geben können und damit helfen, der perfiden Internet Kampagne dieser Straftäter ein Ende zu bereiten.

Magister Bernd Pulch

London , im April 2011

Ende der Mitteilung

——————————————————————————–

Kopie meiner Magister-Urkunde

Rückfragehinweis:

Magister Bernd Pulch

General Global Media Limited

London

office@generalglobalmedia.com

Hier die Pressedokumentation

STATEMENT MAGISTER PULCH 19.4.2011

GOOGLE SKANDAL: UNGLAUBLICHES VERSAGEN BEI GOOGLE – ODER MITTÄTERSCHAFT ?

GOOGLE SKANDAL: UNGLAUBLICHES VERSAGEN BEI GOOGLE – ODER MITTÄTERSCHAFT ?

TROTZ ZUSAGE HAT GOOGLE BIS HEUTE NICHTS GELÖSCHT !

Sehr geehrter Herr Greenbaum (mein Anwalt),

Ihre Email an Herrn Dr. Haller vom 11.05.2011 ist bei der Google Germany

GmbH eingegangen. Ebenso hat uns Frau Wagner über Ihren heutigen Anruf in

Kenntnis gesetzt.

Wie Ihnen bereits bekannt sein dürfte, ist die Google Germany GmbH weder

rechtlich noch technisch in der Lage, Zugriff auf die Suchergebnisse unter

http://www.google.de zu nehmen. Bitte wenden Sie sich daher in Zukunft direkt an

die Google Inc., Betreiberin der Seite http://www.google.de und der Suchmaschine

Google, wie sich dem Impressum unter

http://www.google.com/intl/de/impressum.html entnehmen lässt.

Im Namen der Google Inc. dürfen wir Ihnen nun ein letztes Mal bestätigen,

dass folgende Links bereits aus dem Google-Index entfernt worden sind:

http://www.gomopa.net/Pressemitteilun

http://www.gomopa.net/Pre

http://pressreleaser.org/ber

http://www.gomopa.net/Fina

https://scheisshausfliege.wordp

http://www.gomopa.net/Pressem

https://scheisshausfliege.wordpress.com/

http://www.bernd-pulc

http://www.bernd-pulc

http://www.bernd-pulch

http://www.gomopa.net/Press

http://www.stalker-bern

http://www.stalker-be

http://www.stalk

http://www.sta

Bitte beachten Sie, dass eine Entfernung aus dem Suchindex nicht zu einer

Entfernung der Rechtsverletzung führen kann. Die Funktion einer Suchmaschine

ist es, Internetinhalte auffindbar zu machen, sie verbreitet diese jedoch

nicht selbst. Die Suchfunktionalität ist gewissermaßen das

“Spiegelbild” des Internets.

Sollten Sie weitere Suchergebnisse beanstanden, so müssten wir Sie bitten,

der Google Inc. die konkreten Links, die zu den von Ihnen beanstandeten

Webseiten führen, per Email zukommen zu lassen. Darüber hinaus müssten wir

Sie bitten, substantiiert darzulegen, welche konkreten Aussagen Sie

beanstanden, wo genau sich die angebliche Rechtsverletzung in Bezug auf die

Links befindet und woraus sich diese begründet.

Mit freundlichen Grüßen,

Rechtsabteilung Support

Google Germany GmbH

ABC – Strasse 19

20354 Hamburg

AG Hamburg, HRB 86891

Sitz der Gesellschaft: Hamburg

Geschäftsführer: John Herlihy, Graham Law, Lloyd Martin, Kent Walker

– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –

– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –

Diese E-Mail ist vertraulich. Wenn Sie nicht der richtige Adressat sind,

leiten Sie diese bitte nicht weiter, informieren den Absender und löschen

Sie die E-Mail und alle Anhänge. Vielen Dank.

This email is confidential. If you are not the right addressee please do

not forward it, please inform the sender, and please erase this e-mail

including any attachments. Thanks.

DIE LISTE DER ÜBER 3.400 OPFER DER FINGIERTEN “GoMoPa”

http://www.victims-opfer.com/?page_id=15672

DER VON DER FINGIERTEN “GoMoPa” UND KOMPLIZEN VERURSACHTE BÖRSENCRASH DER WIRECARD-AKTIE: SCHADEN ÜBER € 200 MIO

http://www.onvista.de/aktien/kennzahlen/technisch.html?ID_OSI=7734891

http://www.usag24-betrug.com/index.php/gomopas-wirecard-behauptungen-zweifelhaft-schuett-hat-keinerlei-behauptungen-zu-wirecard-gemacht/

MEINE MAGISTERURKUNDE – DIE STRAFANZEIGEN GEGEN DIE FINGIERTE “GoMoPA” UNDDEREN ANSTIFTER UND HELFER

 

 

 

London (euro adhoc) – Mein Name ist Magister Bernd Pulch.

Ich wende mich an die Öffentlichkeit als Reaktion darauf, das meine Person und Familienangehörige im Internet auf übelste Art und Weise auf verschiedenen Webseiten, die alle den gleichen Ursprung haben, diffamiert und verleumdet wird.

Weiterhin sind Personen aus meinem Umfeld angerufen und mit diesen Beleidigungen und Diffamierungen konfrontiert worden, erpresst und bedroht worden.

Wir haben mehrere Strafanzeigen gegen die Täter in Wiesbaden ( ST/0148943/2011), Hamburg (2100 Js 1108 / 10) und Berlin (110228-0831-037199) erstattet; die polizeilichen Ermittlungen können jedoch nicht auf eine u.a. auch in den USA angemeldete Website verfolgt werden.

Das Geschäft dieser Leute ist es, ehrliche Kauf- und Geschäftsleute durch Diffamierung zu erpressen. Das dieses keinen Erfolg bei mir haben wird steht außer Frage; und dieses wird durch die jetzige Klarstellung unterstrichen.

Zur weiteren Information: In diesem Zusammenhang ist u.a. das sogenannte Nachrichtenportal ´GoMoPa´ zu nennen. Dort sind u.a. wegen Betruges mehrfach vorbestrafte Leute wie ein Herr Klaus Maurischat in leitender Position tätig. Das Impressum von „GoMoPa“ weist keine einzige natürliche Person auf, sondern nur eine Briefkastenadresse in New York.

Die „Berichte“ in „GoMoPa“ sind ohne jeden Beweis und arbeiten mit falschen Behauptungen, deswegen gibt es auch keine Person, die offen für „GoMoPa“ eintritt und eine zustellbare Adresse aufweist.

Der Name Goldman, Morgenstern und Partner ist gleichfalls frei erfunden und soll New Yorker Anwälte suggerieren. Dabei ist die Webseite von „GoMoPa“ ausschliesslich in deutscher Sprache und über 90% der Besucher kommen aus Deutschlands. Nach Recherchen der Wirtschaftskanzle Juricon sind die führenden Köpfe serienmässig vorbestraft und haben eine STASI-Vergangenheit.

Gegen dieses Portal wurde bereits ebenfalls von vielen Seiten Strafanzeige erstattet wie u.a. von den Firmen Wirecard und Meridian Capital.

Ich danke allen Personen die mir weitere Hinweise geben können und damit helfen, der perfiden Internet Kampagne dieser Straftäter ein Ende zu bereiten.

Magister Bernd Pulch

London , im April 2011

Ende der Mitteilung

——————————————————————————–

Kopie meiner Magister-Urkunde

Rückfragehinweis:

Magister Bernd Pulch

General Global Media Limited

London

office@generalglobalmedia.com

Hier die Pressedokumentation

STATEMENT MAGISTER PULCH 19.4.2011

EANS-News: Statement of Magister Bernd Pulch

London (euro adhoc) – My name is Bernd Pulch, I have studied and
acquired the title Master (Magister) according to the academic laws.

Link to my Master´s thesis

http://www.kepplinger.de/search/node/pulch

and

http://www.kepplinger.de/node/50

I am the heir of the family bible and can therefore represent our
family based on this authority.

My family, my friends and I have be stalked in the internet and real
life, blackmailed and threatened by the serial criminals of “GoMoPa” which is an anonymous company with no real persons responsable and a fake impressum. They want to stop my reports about them.

Even the name Goldman, Morgenstern & Partners is a fake. These persons have never existed as members of “GoMoPa”, the criminal organisation. All news of them are fakes.

Therefore we have informed the police. The relevant cases are in
Wiesbaden ( ST/0148943/2011), Hamburg (2100 Js 1108 / 10) and Berlin
(110228-0831-037199)

All activities seem to be in connection with the so called Finance
Agency of “GoMoPa” which has already been sued by many persons and
companies for example by Wirecard and Meridian Capital.

Our family has and had many members who work and worked successfully
as entrepreneurs, secretaries of state, banker, lawyers, farmers,
politicians and also journalists.

We will prevent that our family name is violated.

I will therefore prosecute these criminals with the help of the
police. Magister Bernd Pulch London

end of announcement euro adhoc
——————————————————————————–

Copy of my Bacherlor of Arts document

Further inquiry note:

Bernd Pulch

General Global Media Ltd

London

office@generalglobalmedia.com

Read the press about it

STATEMENT MAGISTER PULCH 19.4.2011

EANS-News: Statement of Magister Bernd Pulch ABOUT THE FAKED “GoMoPa”

EANS-News: Statement of Magister Bernd Pulch

London (euro adhoc) – My name is Bernd Pulch, I have studied and
acquired the title Master (Magister) according to the academic laws.

Link to my Master´s thesis

http://www.kepplinger.de/search/node/pulch

and

http://www.kepplinger.de/node/50

I am the heir of the family bible and can therefore represent our
family based on this authority.

My family, my friends and I have be stalked in the internet and real
life, blackmailed and threatened by the serial criminals of “GoMoPa” which is an anonymous company with no real persons responsable and a fake impressum. They want to stop my reports about them.

Even the name Goldman, Morgenstern & Partners is a fake. These persons have never existed as members of “GoMoPa”, the criminal organisation. All news of them are fakes.

Therefore we have informed the police. The relevant cases are in
Wiesbaden ( ST/0148943/2011), Hamburg (2100 Js 1108 / 10) and Berlin
(110228-0831-037199)

All activities seem to be in connection with the so called Finance
Agency of “GoMoPa” which has already been sued by many persons and
companies for example by Wirecard and Meridian Capital.

Our family has and had many members who work and worked successfully
as entrepreneurs, secretaries of state, banker, lawyers, farmers,
politicians and also journalists.

We will prevent that our family name is violated.

I will therefore prosecute these criminals with the help of the
police. Magister Bernd Pulch London

end of announcement euro adhoc
——————————————————————————–

Copy of my Bacherlor of Arts document

Further inquiry note:

Bernd Pulch

General Global Media Ltd

London

office@generalglobalmedia.com

Read the press about it

STATEMENT MAGISTER PULCH 19.4.2011

EANS-News: Stellungnahme von Magister Bernd Pulch

 

 

 

London (euro adhoc) – Mein Name ist Magister Bernd Pulch.

Ich wende mich an die Öffentlichkeit als Reaktion darauf, das meine Person und Familienangehörige im Internet auf übelste Art und Weise auf verschiedenen Webseiten, die alle den gleichen Ursprung haben, diffamiert und verleumdet wird.

Weiterhin sind Personen aus meinem Umfeld angerufen und mit diesen Beleidigungen und Diffamierungen konfrontiert worden, erpresst und bedroht worden.

Wir haben mehrere Strafanzeigen gegen die Täter in Wiesbaden ( ST/0148943/2011), Hamburg (2100 Js 1108 / 10) und Berlin (110228-0831-037199) erstattet; die polizeilichen Ermittlungen können jedoch nicht auf eine u.a. auch in den USA angemeldete Website verfolgt werden.

Das Geschäft dieser Leute ist es, ehrliche Kauf- und Geschäftsleute durch Diffamierung zu erpressen. Das dieses keinen Erfolg bei mir haben wird steht außer Frage; und dieses wird durch die jetzige Klarstellung unterstrichen.

Zur weiteren Information: In diesem Zusammenhang ist u.a. das sogenannte Nachrichtenportal ´GoMoPa´ zu nennen. Dort sind u.a. wegen Betruges mehrfach vorbestrafte Leute wie ein Herr Klaus Maurischat in leitender Position tätig. Das Impressum von „GoMoPa“ weist keine einzige natürliche Person auf, sondern nur eine Briefkastenadresse in New York.

Die „Berichte“ in „GoMoPa“ sind ohne jeden Beweis und arbeiten mit falschen Behauptungen, deswegen gibt es auch keine Person, die offen für „GoMoPa“ eintritt und eine zustellbare Adresse aufweist.

Der Name Goldman, Morgenstern und Partner ist gleichfalls frei erfunden und soll New Yorker Anwälte suggerieren. Dabei ist die Webseite von „GoMoPa“ ausschliesslich in deutscher Sprache und über 90% der Besucher kommen aus Deutschlands. Nach Recherchen der Wirtschaftskanzle Juricon sind die führenden Köpfe serienmässig vorbestraft und haben eine STASI-Vergangenheit.

Gegen dieses Portal wurde bereits ebenfalls von vielen Seiten Strafanzeige erstattet wie u.a. von den Firmen Wirecard und Meridian Capital.

Ich danke allen Personen die mir weitere Hinweise geben können und damit helfen, der perfiden Internet Kampagne dieser Straftäter ein Ende zu bereiten.

Magister Bernd Pulch

London , im April 2011

Ende der Mitteilung

——————————————————————————–

Kopie meiner Magister-Urkunde

Rückfragehinweis:

Magister Bernd Pulch

General Global Media Limited

London

office@generalglobalmedia.com

Hier die Pressedokumentation

STATEMENT MAGISTER PULCH 19.4.2011

Magister Bernd Pulch fordert im Namen aller Opfer von “GoMoPa” einen justiziablen Ansprechpartner

 

Liebe Leser,

es muss klar gesagt werden:

Beweise: Ich, Magister Bernd Pulch, fordere im Namen aller Stalking-Opfer von “GoMoPa” einen justiziablen Ansprechpartner von “GoMoPa”  samt Zustelladresse !!!

Ich fordere einen Beweis, wer der Eigentümer und bestimmende Finanzier ist!

Eine Eidestaatliche Versicherung von RA Jochen und Manfred Resch, dass sie nicht die beherrenschenden Kräfte der “GoMoPa” sind.

Eine Eidesstattliche Versicherung, dass alle “GoMoPa”-Mitarbeiter nicht vorbestraft sind und nicht gegen ihre Bewährungsauflagen verstossen.

Aussserdem möchte eine Eidesstattliche Versicherung , dass Peter Ehlers und Gerd Bennewirtz die kriminellen “Stalker-Sites” gegen mich in nicht Auftrag gaben.

Ich gebe Ihnen hierfür 24 Stunden !

Hier die Opferliste von “GoMoPa” in 2011 alleine:

Folgende Firmen und Personen wurden u.a. von Peter Ehlers (wenn er denn so heisst) und “GoMoPa”, dem STASI-”NACHICHTENDIENST” seit Jahresanfang – ohne jeden Beweis – verunglimpft, um daraus Profit für Ihren postkommunistischen Saftladen zu schlagen:

– Angela Merkel

– Wolfgang Schäuble

– Accessio AG

– Antek International

– Andreas Decker

– Anna Schwertner

– Bernd Müller

– Bernd Pulch

– Beluga

– Bliznet Group Inc.

– Centrum Immobilien

– Coldwell Banker

– CPA Capital Partners

– CSA

– Debiselect

– Deutsche Bank

– DKB Bank

– Dr. Paul Jensen

– Ekrem Redzepagic

– Erste Mai GmbH

– Express Kurier Europa

– FRONTAL 21

– Garbe

– General Global Media

– Genfer Kreditanstalt

– HCI

– HypoLeasing

– Kreis Sparkasse Tübingen

– Leipziger Bauträger (etliche Firmen, hier subsummiert)

– Lothar Berresheim

– Martina Oeder

– Martin Sachs

– Meridian Capital

– Money Pay

– Oak Tree

– Prime Estate

– Prosperia Mephisto 1 GmbH & Co KG

– Stefan Schramm

– Teldafax

– TipTalk.com

– Wirecard

Natürlich alles OHNE IRGENDEINEN BEWEIS VON VORBESTRAFTEN SERIENBETRÜGERN AUF EINER HOMEPAGE MIT KEINER ECHTEN PERSON IM IMPRESSUM STATTDESSEN MIT EINER NEW YORKER BRIEFKASTENADRESSE IM AUFTRAG MUTMASSLICH VON RA JOCHEN RESCH UND RA MANFRED RESCH, PETER EHLERS UND GERD BENNEWIRTZ -UND UNTER MITARBEIT VON GOOGLE, DEUTSCHLAND,

Herzlichst Ihr

Magister Bernd Pulch

PS DIE OPFERLISTE STAND 1.4.2011 FINDEN SIE HIER:

https://berndpulch.org/die-gomopa-opfer-liste/

So wollte “GoMoPa” mich erpressen, die Berichterstattung einzustellen

So wollte “GoMoPa” mich erpressen

Unser Bildtext: Klaus Maurischat: There is no Place like home

So wollte der Serienbetrüger Klaus Maurischat uns zwingen die Berichterstattung über den “NACHRICHTENDIENST” “GoMoPa” einzustellen

Meine Anmerkung:  Sie lesen

den Original-Text mit den Original-Rechtschreibfehlern von Maurischat  in chronologischer Reihenfolge von unten nach oben. “Unter den Linden” ist die Regus-Tarnadresse für den untergetauchten Serienbetrüger und Stasi-Ganoven. “SUMA” steht im Sprach-Jargon des “GoMoPa”-”NACHRICHTENDIENSTLERS” für Suchmaschine.

Zitat:

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA (MEINE ANTWORT)

> Was anderes fällt einem Hilfsschüler auch nicht ein! Wenn ich dich
> schnappe, dann haue ich dir die Fresse ein – mein Lieber! Merk dir
> das gut, du Kinderficker!
>
> Was sagt denn dein Freund Dr. XXX  zu deinem handeln, Schwuchtel?
>
> > HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA (MEINE ANTWORT)
> >
> > > Geiles Google Suchergebniss hast du mittlerweile. Das ist sowas von
> > > geil. Am besten ist dieser Beitrag zu Deiner Magisterarbeit, du
> > > Spinner:
> > >
> > > http://scheisshausfliege.wordpress.com/2011/01/29/die-diplomarbeit-des-magisters-bernd-pulch-ein-haufen-scheisse/
> > >
> > > Wenn du nicht aufhörst, wird niemand mehr ein Stück Brot von dir
> > > nehmen. Dein Name ist dan absolut durch. Glaub mir, wir verstehen da
> > > mehr von als du Schwachkopf!
> > >
> > > Im Übrigen kannst du mich stets gern persönlich treffen. Unter den
> > > Linden 21, Berlin –  habe immer für dich Feigling Zeit! (TARN-ADRESSE)
> > >
> > > So – und nun überle wann du die Artikel über uns löschen willst,
> > > sonst mache ich die erste Seite der SUMA Ergebnisse mit deinen
> > > Einträgen voll.

GOOGLE SKANDAL: UNGLAUBLICHES VERSAGEN BEI GOOGLE – ODER MITTÄTERSCHAFT ?

GOOGLE SKANDAL: UNGLAUBLICHES VERSAGEN BEI GOOGLE – ODER MITTÄTERSCHAFT ?

TROTZ ZUSAGE HAT GOOGLE BIS HEUTE NICHTS GELÖSCHT !

Sehr geehrter Herr Greenbaum (mein Anwalt),

Ihre Email an Herrn Dr. Haller vom 11.05.2011 ist bei der Google Germany

GmbH eingegangen. Ebenso hat uns Frau Wagner über Ihren heutigen Anruf in

Kenntnis gesetzt.

Wie Ihnen bereits bekannt sein dürfte, ist die Google Germany GmbH weder

rechtlich noch technisch in der Lage, Zugriff auf die Suchergebnisse unter

http://www.google.de zu nehmen. Bitte wenden Sie sich daher in Zukunft direkt an

die Google Inc., Betreiberin der Seite http://www.google.de und der Suchmaschine

Google, wie sich dem Impressum unter

http://www.google.com/intl/de/impressum.html entnehmen lässt.

Im Namen der Google Inc. dürfen wir Ihnen nun ein letztes Mal bestätigen,

dass folgende Links bereits aus dem Google-Index entfernt worden sind:

http://www.gomopa.net/Pressemitteilun

http://www.gomopa.net/Pre

http://pressreleaser.org/ber

http://www.gomopa.net/Fina

https://scheisshausfliege.wordp

http://www.gomopa.net/Pressem

https://scheisshausfliege.wordpress.com/

http://www.bernd-pulc

http://www.bernd-pulc

http://www.bernd-pulch

http://www.gomopa.net/Press

http://www.stalker-bern

http://www.stalker-be

http://www.stalk

http://www.sta

Bitte beachten Sie, dass eine Entfernung aus dem Suchindex nicht zu einer

Entfernung der Rechtsverletzung führen kann. Die Funktion einer Suchmaschine

ist es, Internetinhalte auffindbar zu machen, sie verbreitet diese jedoch

nicht selbst. Die Suchfunktionalität ist gewissermaßen das

“Spiegelbild” des Internets.

Sollten Sie weitere Suchergebnisse beanstanden, so müssten wir Sie bitten,

der Google Inc. die konkreten Links, die zu den von Ihnen beanstandeten

Webseiten führen, per Email zukommen zu lassen. Darüber hinaus müssten wir

Sie bitten, substantiiert darzulegen, welche konkreten Aussagen Sie

beanstanden, wo genau sich die angebliche Rechtsverletzung in Bezug auf die

Links befindet und woraus sich diese begründet.

Mit freundlichen Grüßen,

Rechtsabteilung Support

Google Germany GmbH

ABC – Strasse 19

20354 Hamburg

AG Hamburg, HRB 86891

Sitz der Gesellschaft: Hamburg

Geschäftsführer: John Herlihy, Graham Law, Lloyd Martin, Kent Walker

– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –

– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –

Diese E-Mail ist vertraulich. Wenn Sie nicht der richtige Adressat sind,

leiten Sie diese bitte nicht weiter, informieren den Absender und löschen

Sie die E-Mail und alle Anhänge. Vielen Dank.

This email is confidential. If you are not the right addressee please do

not forward it, please inform the sender, and please erase this e-mail

including any attachments. Thanks.

DER VON DER FINGIERTEN “GoMoPa” VERURSACHTE BÖRSENCRASH DER WIRECARD-AKTIE: SCHADEN ÜBER € 200 MIO

http://www.onvista.de/aktien/kennzahlen/technisch.html?ID_OSI=7734891

http://www.usag24-betrug.com/index.php/gomopas-wirecard-behauptungen-zweifelhaft-schuett-hat-keinerlei-behauptungen-zu-wirecard-gemacht/

“SPIEGEL” über die STASI-Connection des mutmasslichen “GoMoPa”-Chefs Jochen Resch

http://www.spiegel.de/spiegel/print/d-65717414.html

DIE FINANCIAL TIMES über die erfundenen “Goldman, Morgenstern und Partner” alias “GoMoPa”

http://www.victims-opfer.com/?page_id=11764

Die Methode der fingierten “GoMoPa”: Mobbing – Rufmord

Rufmord beinhaltet den Begriff Mord und ist die wohl schwerwiegendste Art eines Gerüchts oder einer üblen Nachrede. Der Täter beabsichtigt ja ganz gezielt und mit Überlegung seinem Opfer nachhaltig zu schaden.

Cybermobbing und Internetmobbing

sind die modernen Spielarten von Rufmord, Beleidigung, übler Nachrede, Geschäftsschädigung, Identitätsklau, Verhöhnung von Opfern, Psychoterror, etc. durch Verwendung moderner Kommunikationsmittel, insbesondere des Internets.

Das Opfer wird durch diskriminierende Texte, Bilder oder Filme öffentlich zur Schau gestellt, beleidigt und meist “unter der Gürtellinien” angegriffen. Neben der Veröffentlichung auf Webseiten und Blogs, findet Cybermobbing auch per SMS, Chat, in Foren oder Videoportalen statt.

In verschiedenen Staaten wurden bereits gegen Cybermobbing Gesetze erlassen. In Deutschland drohen neben kostenpflichtigen Abmahnungen auch Schadensersatzklagen. In gravierenden Fällen ist mit strafrechtlichen Konsequenzen zu rechnen, wobei die Ermittlungsbehörden speziell für Cybermobbing entwickelte  Software verwenden um den Tätern auf die Spur zu kommen.

Cyberbullying ist der englische Ausdruck für Cybermobbing.

Die weite Verbreitung von Cyber-bullying in England und den USA hat zu einer Aktivierung vorhandener und zum Teil sogar zur Einführung neuer Gesetze geführt.

Daneben drohen in diesen Ländern, besonders in den USA, auch horrende Schadensersatzforderungen.

Missouri hat auf den Selbstmord eines jungen Mädchens durch Cyberbullying mit einer zusätzlichen besonderen Verschärfung der Gesetzeslage reagiert.

Unter Cybergrooming versteht man die sexuelle Belästigung von Kindern und Jugendlichen im Internet.

Cyber-mobbing ist kein harmloser Scherz, sondern übles,

meist sogar kriminelles Mobbing

Ein neuer Schulsport hat sich etabliert: Cybermobbing. Sobald Schüler in der Lage sind Dateien hoch zu laden, eröffnet sich die unerschöpfliche Welt des Internets und die Möglichkeit andere mit Texten und Bildmaterial zu informieren.

Das world wide web saugt jede Information auf wie ein Schwamm, behält sie und vervielfältigt sie.

Bereits 1998 wurde auf dieser Webseite auf die beängstigenden Möglichkeiten hingewiesen, die sich aus den genannten Eigenschaften des Internets für so problematische Vorgänge wie Mobbing, Nachbarschaftsstreit, Rufmord, persönliche Streitfälle, etc. ergeben.

Der persönlichen Rache wird durch des Internet Tür und Tor geöffnet und, das sei klar gesagt, die juristischen Möglichkeiten sich dagegen zu wehren sind gegenwärtig gering.

Während kommerzielle deutsche Webseiten wegen eines nicht ausgeschriebenen Vornamens kostenpflichtig abgemahnt werden, werden in Blogs, Foren, Chats und ähnlichen Einrichtungen Persönlichkeitsrechte in gravierender Weise verletzt ohne dass der Betroffene die Möglichkeit hat dies zu verhindern.

Oft sind die “Täter” noch nicht einmal strafmündig und erfreuen sich innerhalb ihrer Klassen großer Beliebtheit weil sie ein Video online stellen, indem der Lehrer (scheinbar) in der Nase bohrt.

Prinzipiell beschränkt sich das Cybermobbing nicht auf Jugendliche. Diese Altergruppe ist im Hinblick auf das Cybermobbing zahlenmäßig besonders auffällig, gleichzeitig sind aber Jungendliche auch häufiger im Internet als Erwachsene. Damit wird diese Häufigkeit wieder relativiert. Im übrigen sind Jugendliche technisch einfach “besser drauf” und gehen mit den elektronischen Möglichkeiten mit größerer Selbstverständlichkeit um.

Dramatische Fälle von Cybermobbing

Es gibt viele Fälle von Cybermobbing, die im Bereich von Straftaten anzusiedeln sind. Aufsehen erregte vor einiger Zeit der Selbstmord eines Mädchens, das über eine Forumsbekanntschaft angeblich zum Selbstmord getrieben wurde. Eine Nachbarin hatte in einem Kontaktforum die Nachbarstochter erkannt und ein böses Spiel mit ihr getrieben.

Ist der beschriebene, extreme Fall von tödlichem Cybermobbing symptomatisch für eine Entwicklung im Internet, die an unserem Rechtssystem rüttelt und unsere Intimsphäre gefährdet?

Zahlreiche Beispiele scheinen diesen Schluss nahe zu legen.

Verschmähte Liebhaber oder ehemalige Partner greifen immer häufiger in die Trickkiste des Internets und zaubern Infos ins Netz. Da kann dann das Urlaubsvideo bei dem der Badeanzug verrutscht schon mal bei youtube landen. Inklusive Adresse und Telefonnummer.

Lehrer in peinlichen Situation mit dem Handy auf zu nehmen und dann online zu stellen gehört mittlerweile ebenso zum Schulalltag wie das Filmen von Gewalttaten im Pausenhof.

Nachbarn filmen sich gegenseitig und stellen die Clips ins Netz.

Schüler und Studenten benützen Schulfeiern und Ausflüge um peinliche Aufnahmen ihrer Mitschüler zu machen und stellen die “witzigsten Aufnahmen” ins Internet. Häufig mit Nennung des Namens, ja sogar der Adresse. Es sind Fälle bekannt geworden, in denen diskriminierende Veröffentlichungen ganz bewusst zur Karrierehemmung eingesetzt wurden!

Geschäftsschädigung durch Cybermobbing.  Es hat sich eine “ganz tolle Idee” herumgesprochen: Seinen Konkurrenten mit Hilfe von Cybermobbingfertig machen!

Unter der Überschrift

Betrug! Betrug! Betrug!

wird eine Verleumdungskampagne gestartet, die sich durch die internationale Vernetzung von Foren selbstständig weiter verbreitet. Es gibt in Deutschland bereits mehrere tausend Betroffene dieser Art von Internetkriminalität. Der Schaden ist ernorm!

Das Vorgehen des Mobbers ist sehr einfach:

Er meldet sich mit einer “Phantasie E-Mail” wie etwa Yetirasierer@spasskopf-ru bei einem Forum an. Bei vielen Foren kann dann sofort geschrieben werden, es wird nicht einmal geprüft ob die angegebene E-Mail existiert!

Witzbolde verwenden gern “Noname”, “ipboy” oder “Nobody” als Pseudonym, auch “anonymouse” hat eine gewisse Berühmtheit erreicht durch seine Aktivitäten gegen eine Sekte.

Wer Wert auf “Seriosität” legt, der nimmt einen normalen Namen, nennt sich Monalisa, Herzchen, oder Herr Schroeder. Es kommt leider immer häufiger vor, dass sich diese Leute auch als (angebliche Mitglieder) einer Verbraucherschutzorganisation oder als Vorsitzende von Vereinen ausgeben.

Aufrufe eine “Sammelklage” anzustrengen oder die Medien zu informieren werden ebenfalls gern an den Texte angehängt.

Besonders findige Internetstörer fordern den Leser auf, E-Mails zu schicken und für weiteres “Beweismaterial” zu sorgen. Diese Mails werden dann unter Nennung sämtlicher, oft privater Angaben ins Netz gestellt. Nicht selten werden an den eingesandten Text beleidigende oder rufschädigende Texte angehängt und der Schreiber der E-Mail traut seinen Augen nicht, wenn er liest, was da unter Nennung seines Namens und seiner E-Mailadresse veröffentlich wird.

Hinterhältig ist auch die Variante bei der Namen von Geschäftsinhabern verwendet werden, die z. B. in der gleichen Stadt ähnliche Geschäfte betreiben. Damit können dann gleich zwei Personen bzw. Geschäftsinhaber gleichzeitig gemobbt werden, indem der eine angeblich den anderen öffentlich (im Internet) des Betrugs bezichtigt.

Meist wird eine Überschrift gewählt die Aufmerksamkeit erregt:

Betrug !!!  Abzocke !!!   Unverschämtheit !!! Schwindel !!!

Es folgt irgendein Vorwurf, der glaubhaft ist und der emotional aufwühlt:

Restaurantbesitzer spukt ins Essen seiner Gäste!

Besitzer eines Photoladens kopiert Aktaufnahmen seiner Kunden und bringt sie ins Internet!

Autohändler befüllt seine Autos mit Dicköl, damit das Klappern der Motors nicht mehr zu hören ist!

Weinhandlung panscht ihre Produkte!

In der Pizza ist alles, nur nicht das was angeblich drin sein sollte!

Biobauer spritzt heimlich in der Nacht sein Gemüse mit Insektiziden!

Computerreparatur – kopiert ihre privaten Sexdateien

Dann wird der Namen und die Adresse genannt.

Das Ganze wird in einem Forum veröffentlicht, das nicht in Deutschland angemeldet ist, bzw. das sich der deutschen Rechtssprechung entzieht.

Nun würde man annehmen, dass auch ein im Ausland befindlicher Admin eine Beschwerde bezüglich diffamierender Texte ernst nimmt und den Beitrag löscht. Allein schon eine Überschrift wie Betrug, Betrug, Betrug, von “Anonymus” und eine völlig absurde E-Mailadresse, sollten einen verantwortungsvollen Administrator eines Forums zur Löschung veranlassen.

Leider ist genau das Gegenteil der Fall! Da gerade Überschriften bzw. Keywords die “Betrug” oder “Abzocke” enthalten besonders häufig aufgerufen werden, bringt der diffamierende Text “traffic” auf die Webseite bzw. ins Forum. Das Ranking des Forums steigt und die darauf befindliche Werbung wird  häufiger angeklickt.

Irrwitziges Resultat: Meist befindet sich neben dem diffamierenden Text genau für jenes Produkt oder für jene Dienstleistung Werbung, über die im Forumstext gelästert wird, denn die Crawler erkennen diese offensichtliche Absurdität nicht.

Diese Art des Internetmobbings betrifft hauptsächlich Geschäftsleute.

Mit anderen Schlagworten wie “Mörder”“Sittenstrolch”,  “Dieb” , “Tierquäler” etc. trifft es aber zunehmend auch private Personen. Lehrer waren und sind das bevorzugte Ziel solcher Internet-Attacken aber zunehmend werden andere auch Berufe, ja sogar Privatpersonen aufs Korn genommen.

Wie wehre ich mich gegen Cybermobbing ?

Zunächst ist festzustellen, dass die diffamierenden Beiträge fast immer mit Hilfe “anonymisierender Dienste” geschrieben werden.  Mailadresse und Ip sind zufällig erstellt und so anonymisiert, dass sie (fast) nicht zurück verfolgt werden können. Aus diesem Grund tauchen auch die Pseudonyme Anonymous, Anonym, Random (Zufall),  nobody etc. häufig auf.

Mal ehrlich, wie kann ein Admin bei einem Eintrag von “Dave U. R. -”anonym…*anonymitaet-im-inter.net” bei dem eine Person namentlich genannt wird und des Betrugs bezichtigt wird, noch guten Gewissens den Beitrag in seinem Forum lassen?

Vergessen wird nicht:

der größte Lump im ganzen Land ist und bleibt der Denunziant !

und

der Hehler ist schlimmer als der Stehler !

(im übertragenen Sinne wäre der Admin dann der Hehler, denn er “verhökert” die fragwürdige Information ja weiter, im vollen Bewusstsein, dass dies rechtswidrig ist.)

Von seiner Mitschuld wird der Admin auch nicht  befreit wenn unter dem betreffenden Nick der Vermerk steht: Konto geschlossen wegen Verstoß gegen die Nutzungsbedingungen.

Wird der diffamierende Beitrag nicht gelöscht ist dies perfektes Flaming des Admins um Beiträge und traffic zu erzeugen und das Internet in eine Müllhalde zu verwandeln, soweit es das nicht sowieso schon ist.

Ganz super ist auch der Hinweis des Admins, dass der diffamierende Beitrag gegen die Forenregeln verstößt, inklusive der Netiquette.

Was soll z. B. so eine Ansage?  “The sender address of this message is not related to a real person but to a fake address of an anonymous system”

Warum löscht der Admin den verleumderischen Texte dann nicht, wenn er schon erkennen kann dass es ein fake ist?

Ausländische Foren – rechtsfreie Räume für Mobber, Spammer und Faker

Um sich gegen Cybermobbing  zu wehren wird der Normalbürger zunächst den Rechtsweg beschreiten (wollen). Leider befinden sich die Spamforenmeist außerhalb des deutschen Rechts, mit anderen Worten: man kann sich eine Anzeige oder ein Verfahren sparen.

Da viele ausländische Foren sich nicht einmal die Mühe machen auf eine Beschwerde zu reagieren, geschweige denn zu löschen, bleibt demBetroffenen nur die Möglichkeit den diffamierenden Beitrag zu “verdünnen”.

Abwehr von Cybermobbing durch “verdünnen” der Beiträge

Dies kann dadurch bewerkstelligt werden, dass eine Stellungnahme zu dem diffamierenden Text geschrieben wird und an den Text im Forum angehängt wird. Oft wird dadurch aber genau das Gegenteil erreicht, denn je mehr Beiträge zu einem Thema geschrieben werden, desto besser wird die Position bei einer Suchmaschine und es klicken noch mehr Leute den beleidigenden Text an.

Eine andere Möglichkeit sich gegen Cybermobbing zu wehren, wäre die schlechten Texte durch gute Texte zu verdrängen. Natürlich müssen diese Beiträge ebenfalls in einem Forum veröffentlicht werden um überhaupt in eine vordere Position bei den Suchmaschinen zu kommen.

Die Betroffenen und Geschädigten von Cybermobbing machen sich natürlich Gedanken darüber, wer wohl den Dreck und die Diffamierungen im Internet veröffentlicht hat.

Süddeutsche Zeitung über die Wirtschaftskriminellen der fingerten “GoMoPa”

https://immovationag.wordpress.com/2010/09/15/sueddeutsche-de-am-virtuellen-pranger/

DIE LISTE DER MHER ALS 3.400 OPFER DER FINGIERTEN “GoMoPa”

http://www.victims-opfer.com/?p=15058

DIE FINANCIAL TIMES über die erfundenen “Goldman, Morgenstern und Partner” alias “GoMoPa”

http://www.victims-opfer.com/?page_id=11764

Strafanzeigen gegen fingierte STASI-“GoMoPa” in der Presse

Downloaden Sie die Dokumentation hier:

STATEMENT MAGISTER PULCH 19.4.2011

So wollte “GoMoPa” mich erpressen

So wollte “GoMoPa” mich erpressen

Unser Bildtext: Klaus Maurischat: There is no Place like home

So wollte der Serienbetrüger Klaus Maurischat uns zwingen die Berichterstattung über den “NACHRICHTENDIENST” “GoMoPa” einzustellen

Meine Anmerkung:  Sie lesen

den Original-Text mit den Original-Rechtschreibfehlern von Maurischat  in chronologischer Reihenfolge von unten nach oben. “Unter den Linden” ist die Regus-Tarnadresse für den untergetauchten Serienbetrüger und Stasi-Ganoven. “SUMA” steht im Sprach-Jargon des “GoMoPa”-”NACHRICHTENDIENSTLERS” für Suchmaschine.

Zitat:

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA (MEINE ANTWORT)

> Was anderes fällt einem Hilfsschüler auch nicht ein! Wenn ich dich
> schnappe, dann haue ich dir die Fresse ein – mein Lieber! Merk dir
> das gut, du Kinderficker!
>
> Was sagt denn dein Freund Dr. XXX  zu deinem handeln, Schwuchtel?
>
> > HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA (MEINE ANTWORT)
> >
> > > Geiles Google Suchergebniss hast du mittlerweile. Das ist sowas von
> > > geil. Am besten ist dieser Beitrag zu Deiner Magisterarbeit, du
> > > Spinner:
> > >
> > > http://scheisshausfliege.wordpress.com/2011/01/29/die-diplomarbeit-des-magisters-bernd-pulch-ein-haufen-scheisse/
> > >
> > > Wenn du nicht aufhörst, wird niemand mehr ein Stück Brot von dir
> > > nehmen. Dein Name ist dan absolut durch. Glaub mir, wir verstehen da
> > > mehr von als du Schwachkopf!
> > >
> > > Im Übrigen kannst du mich stets gern persönlich treffen. Unter den
> > > Linden 21, Berlin –  habe immer für dich Feigling Zeit! (TARN-ADRESSE)
> > >
> > > So – und nun überle wann du die Artikel über uns löschen willst,
> > > sonst mache ich die erste Seite der SUMA Ergebnisse mit deinen
> > > Einträgen voll.

Gefälscher Lebenslauf des “CEO” der fingierten “GoMoPa”-STASI

http://www.victims-opfer.com/?p=12461

Die Methode der fingierten “GoMoPa”: Mobbing – Rufmord

Rufmord beinhaltet den Begriff Mord und ist die wohl schwerwiegendste Art eines Gerüchts oder einer üblen Nachrede. Der Täter beabsichtigt ja ganz gezielt und mit Überlegung seinem Opfer nachhaltig zu schaden.

Cybermobbing und Internetmobbing

sind die modernen Spielarten von Rufmord, Beleidigung, übler Nachrede, Geschäftsschädigung, Identitätsklau, Verhöhnung von Opfern, Psychoterror, etc. durch Verwendung moderner Kommunikationsmittel, insbesondere des Internets.

Das Opfer wird durch diskriminierende Texte, Bilder oder Filme öffentlich zur Schau gestellt, beleidigt und meist “unter der Gürtellinien” angegriffen. Neben der Veröffentlichung auf Webseiten und Blogs, findet Cybermobbing auch per SMS, Chat, in Foren oder Videoportalen statt.

In verschiedenen Staaten wurden bereits gegen Cybermobbing Gesetze erlassen. In Deutschland drohen neben kostenpflichtigen Abmahnungen auch Schadensersatzklagen. In gravierenden Fällen ist mit strafrechtlichen Konsequenzen zu rechnen, wobei die Ermittlungsbehörden speziell für Cybermobbing entwickelte  Software verwenden um den Tätern auf die Spur zu kommen.

Cyberbullying ist der englische Ausdruck für Cybermobbing.

Die weite Verbreitung von Cyber-bullying in England und den USA hat zu einer Aktivierung vorhandener und zum Teil sogar zur Einführung neuer Gesetze geführt.

Daneben drohen in diesen Ländern, besonders in den USA, auch horrende Schadensersatzforderungen.

Missouri hat auf den Selbstmord eines jungen Mädchens durch Cyberbullying mit einer zusätzlichen besonderen Verschärfung der Gesetzeslage reagiert.

Unter Cybergrooming versteht man die sexuelle Belästigung von Kindern und Jugendlichen im Internet.

Cyber-mobbing ist kein harmloser Scherz, sondern übles,

meist sogar kriminelles Mobbing

Ein neuer Schulsport hat sich etabliert: Cybermobbing. Sobald Schüler in der Lage sind Dateien hoch zu laden, eröffnet sich die unerschöpfliche Welt des Internets und die Möglichkeit andere mit Texten und Bildmaterial zu informieren.

Das world wide web saugt jede Information auf wie ein Schwamm, behält sie und vervielfältigt sie.

Bereits 1998 wurde auf dieser Webseite auf die beängstigenden Möglichkeiten hingewiesen, die sich aus den genannten Eigenschaften des Internets für so problematische Vorgänge wie Mobbing, Nachbarschaftsstreit, Rufmord, persönliche Streitfälle, etc. ergeben.

Der persönlichen Rache wird durch des Internet Tür und Tor geöffnet und, das sei klar gesagt, die juristischen Möglichkeiten sich dagegen zu wehren sind gegenwärtig gering.

Während kommerzielle deutsche Webseiten wegen eines nicht ausgeschriebenen Vornamens kostenpflichtig abgemahnt werden, werden in Blogs, Foren, Chats und ähnlichen Einrichtungen Persönlichkeitsrechte in gravierender Weise verletzt ohne dass der Betroffene die Möglichkeit hat dies zu verhindern.

Oft sind die “Täter” noch nicht einmal strafmündig und erfreuen sich innerhalb ihrer Klassen großer Beliebtheit weil sie ein Video online stellen, indem der Lehrer (scheinbar) in der Nase bohrt.

Prinzipiell beschränkt sich das Cybermobbing nicht auf Jugendliche. Diese Altergruppe ist im Hinblick auf das Cybermobbing zahlenmäßig besonders auffällig, gleichzeitig sind aber Jungendliche auch häufiger im Internet als Erwachsene. Damit wird diese Häufigkeit wieder relativiert. Im übrigen sind Jugendliche technisch einfach “besser drauf” und gehen mit den elektronischen Möglichkeiten mit größerer Selbstverständlichkeit um.

Dramatische Fälle von Cybermobbing

Es gibt viele Fälle von Cybermobbing, die im Bereich von Straftaten anzusiedeln sind. Aufsehen erregte vor einiger Zeit der Selbstmord eines Mädchens, das über eine Forumsbekanntschaft angeblich zum Selbstmord getrieben wurde. Eine Nachbarin hatte in einem Kontaktforum die Nachbarstochter erkannt und ein böses Spiel mit ihr getrieben.

Ist der beschriebene, extreme Fall von tödlichem Cybermobbing symptomatisch für eine Entwicklung im Internet, die an unserem Rechtssystem rüttelt und unsere Intimsphäre gefährdet?

Zahlreiche Beispiele scheinen diesen Schluss nahe zu legen.

Verschmähte Liebhaber oder ehemalige Partner greifen immer häufiger in die Trickkiste des Internets und zaubern Infos ins Netz. Da kann dann das Urlaubsvideo bei dem der Badeanzug verrutscht schon mal bei youtube landen. Inklusive Adresse und Telefonnummer.

Lehrer in peinlichen Situation mit dem Handy auf zu nehmen und dann online zu stellen gehört mittlerweile ebenso zum Schulalltag wie das Filmen von Gewalttaten im Pausenhof.

Nachbarn filmen sich gegenseitig und stellen die Clips ins Netz.

Schüler und Studenten benützen Schulfeiern und Ausflüge um peinliche Aufnahmen ihrer Mitschüler zu machen und stellen die “witzigsten Aufnahmen” ins Internet. Häufig mit Nennung des Namens, ja sogar der Adresse. Es sind Fälle bekannt geworden, in denen diskriminierende Veröffentlichungen ganz bewusst zur Karrierehemmung eingesetzt wurden!

Geschäftsschädigung durch Cybermobbing.  Es hat sich eine “ganz tolle Idee” herumgesprochen: Seinen Konkurrenten mit Hilfe von Cybermobbingfertig machen!

Unter der Überschrift

Betrug! Betrug! Betrug!

wird eine Verleumdungskampagne gestartet, die sich durch die internationale Vernetzung von Foren selbstständig weiter verbreitet. Es gibt in Deutschland bereits mehrere tausend Betroffene dieser Art von Internetkriminalität. Der Schaden ist ernorm!

Das Vorgehen des Mobbers ist sehr einfach:

Er meldet sich mit einer “Phantasie E-Mail” wie etwa Yetirasierer@spasskopf-ru bei einem Forum an. Bei vielen Foren kann dann sofort geschrieben werden, es wird nicht einmal geprüft ob die angegebene E-Mail existiert!

Witzbolde verwenden gern “Noname”, “ipboy” oder “Nobody” als Pseudonym, auch “anonymouse” hat eine gewisse Berühmtheit erreicht durch seine Aktivitäten gegen eine Sekte.

Wer Wert auf “Seriosität” legt, der nimmt einen normalen Namen, nennt sich Monalisa, Herzchen, oder Herr Schroeder. Es kommt leider immer häufiger vor, dass sich diese Leute auch als (angebliche Mitglieder) einer Verbraucherschutzorganisation oder als Vorsitzende von Vereinen ausgeben.

Aufrufe eine “Sammelklage” anzustrengen oder die Medien zu informieren werden ebenfalls gern an den Texte angehängt.

Besonders findige Internetstörer fordern den Leser auf, E-Mails zu schicken und für weiteres “Beweismaterial” zu sorgen. Diese Mails werden dann unter Nennung sämtlicher, oft privater Angaben ins Netz gestellt. Nicht selten werden an den eingesandten Text beleidigende oder rufschädigende Texte angehängt und der Schreiber der E-Mail traut seinen Augen nicht, wenn er liest, was da unter Nennung seines Namens und seiner E-Mailadresse veröffentlich wird.

Hinterhältig ist auch die Variante bei der Namen von Geschäftsinhabern verwendet werden, die z. B. in der gleichen Stadt ähnliche Geschäfte betreiben. Damit können dann gleich zwei Personen bzw. Geschäftsinhaber gleichzeitig gemobbt werden, indem der eine angeblich den anderen öffentlich (im Internet) des Betrugs bezichtigt.

Meist wird eine Überschrift gewählt die Aufmerksamkeit erregt:

Betrug !!!  Abzocke !!!   Unverschämtheit !!! Schwindel !!!

Es folgt irgendein Vorwurf, der glaubhaft ist und der emotional aufwühlt:

Restaurantbesitzer spukt ins Essen seiner Gäste!

Besitzer eines Photoladens kopiert Aktaufnahmen seiner Kunden und bringt sie ins Internet!

Autohändler befüllt seine Autos mit Dicköl, damit das Klappern der Motors nicht mehr zu hören ist!

Weinhandlung panscht ihre Produkte!

In der Pizza ist alles, nur nicht das was angeblich drin sein sollte!

Biobauer spritzt heimlich in der Nacht sein Gemüse mit Insektiziden!

Computerreparatur – kopiert ihre privaten Sexdateien

Dann wird der Namen und die Adresse genannt.

Das Ganze wird in einem Forum veröffentlicht, das nicht in Deutschland angemeldet ist, bzw. das sich der deutschen Rechtssprechung entzieht.

Nun würde man annehmen, dass auch ein im Ausland befindlicher Admin eine Beschwerde bezüglich diffamierender Texte ernst nimmt und den Beitrag löscht. Allein schon eine Überschrift wie Betrug, Betrug, Betrug, von “Anonymus” und eine völlig absurde E-Mailadresse, sollten einen verantwortungsvollen Administrator eines Forums zur Löschung veranlassen.

Leider ist genau das Gegenteil der Fall! Da gerade Überschriften bzw. Keywords die “Betrug” oder “Abzocke” enthalten besonders häufig aufgerufen werden, bringt der diffamierende Text “traffic” auf die Webseite bzw. ins Forum. Das Ranking des Forums steigt und die darauf befindliche Werbung wird  häufiger angeklickt.

Irrwitziges Resultat: Meist befindet sich neben dem diffamierenden Text genau für jenes Produkt oder für jene Dienstleistung Werbung, über die im Forumstext gelästert wird, denn die Crawler erkennen diese offensichtliche Absurdität nicht.

Diese Art des Internetmobbings betrifft hauptsächlich Geschäftsleute.

Mit anderen Schlagworten wie “Mörder”“Sittenstrolch”,  “Dieb” , “Tierquäler” etc. trifft es aber zunehmend auch private Personen. Lehrer waren und sind das bevorzugte Ziel solcher Internet-Attacken aber zunehmend werden andere auch Berufe, ja sogar Privatpersonen aufs Korn genommen.

Wie wehre ich mich gegen Cybermobbing ?

Zunächst ist festzustellen, dass die diffamierenden Beiträge fast immer mit Hilfe “anonymisierender Dienste” geschrieben werden.  Mailadresse und Ip sind zufällig erstellt und so anonymisiert, dass sie (fast) nicht zurück verfolgt werden können. Aus diesem Grund tauchen auch die Pseudonyme Anonymous, Anonym, Random (Zufall),  nobody etc. häufig auf.

Mal ehrlich, wie kann ein Admin bei einem Eintrag von “Dave U. R. -“anonym…*anonymitaet-im-inter.net” bei dem eine Person namentlich genannt wird und des Betrugs bezichtigt wird, noch guten Gewissens den Beitrag in seinem Forum lassen?

Vergessen wird nicht:

der größte Lump im ganzen Land ist und bleibt der Denunziant !

und

der Hehler ist schlimmer als der Stehler !

(im übertragenen Sinne wäre der Admin dann der Hehler, denn er “verhökert” die fragwürdige Information ja weiter, im vollen Bewusstsein, dass dies rechtswidrig ist.)

Von seiner Mitschuld wird der Admin auch nicht  befreit wenn unter dem betreffenden Nick der Vermerk steht: Konto geschlossen wegen Verstoß gegen die Nutzungsbedingungen.

Wird der diffamierende Beitrag nicht gelöscht ist dies perfektes Flaming des Admins um Beiträge und traffic zu erzeugen und das Internet in eine Müllhalde zu verwandeln, soweit es das nicht sowieso schon ist.

Ganz super ist auch der Hinweis des Admins, dass der diffamierende Beitrag gegen die Forenregeln verstößt, inklusive der Netiquette.

Was soll z. B. so eine Ansage?  “The sender address of this message is not related to a real person but to a fake address of an anonymous system”

Warum löscht der Admin den verleumderischen Texte dann nicht, wenn er schon erkennen kann dass es ein fake ist?

Ausländische Foren – rechtsfreie Räume für Mobber, Spammer und Faker

Um sich gegen Cybermobbing  zu wehren wird der Normalbürger zunächst den Rechtsweg beschreiten (wollen). Leider befinden sich die Spamforenmeist außerhalb des deutschen Rechts, mit anderen Worten: man kann sich eine Anzeige oder ein Verfahren sparen.

Da viele ausländische Foren sich nicht einmal die Mühe machen auf eine Beschwerde zu reagieren, geschweige denn zu löschen, bleibt demBetroffenen nur die Möglichkeit den diffamierenden Beitrag zu “verdünnen”.

Abwehr von Cybermobbing durch “verdünnen” der Beiträge

Dies kann dadurch bewerkstelligt werden, dass eine Stellungnahme zu dem diffamierenden Text geschrieben wird und an den Text im Forum angehängt wird. Oft wird dadurch aber genau das Gegenteil erreicht, denn je mehr Beiträge zu einem Thema geschrieben werden, desto besser wird die Position bei einer Suchmaschine und es klicken noch mehr Leute den beleidigenden Text an.

Eine andere Möglichkeit sich gegen Cybermobbing zu wehren, wäre die schlechten Texte durch gute Texte zu verdrängen. Natürlich müssen diese Beiträge ebenfalls in einem Forum veröffentlicht werden um überhaupt in eine vordere Position bei den Suchmaschinen zu kommen.

Die Betroffenen und Geschädigten von Cybermobbing machen sich natürlich Gedanken darüber, wer wohl den Dreck und die Diffamierungen im Internet veröffentlicht hat.

Original STELLUNGNAHME VON MERIDIAN CAPITAL ZU “GoMoPa”

Liebe Leser,

hier die Original-Stellungnahme von Meridian Capital:

http://meridiancapital.wordpress.com

http://www.immobilien-vertraulich.com/law/7129-bericht-von-meridian-capital-ueber-die-verhaftung-von-gomopa-chef-klaus-maurischat-durch-das-bka-in-berlin-.html

Hier der Artikel von “GoMoPa” über Meridian Capital.

http://www.investment-on.com/Investment-Magazin/der-beweis-erpressungsversuch-des-nachrichtendienstes-gomopa-an-meridian-capital.html

Hier die Hintergründe der Erpressung:

http://www.immobilien-vertraulich.com/law/7154-opfer-nach-immovation-und-estavis-versucht-gomopa-nun-dkb-zu-erpressen-gomopa-hintermann-ra-resch.html

Mit Ihren STASI-MEthoden wollen die “GoMoPa”-STASI-Verbrecher die Wahrheit unterdrücken.

Das wird Ihnen nicht gelingen.

Juricon über “GoMoPa” inklusive STASI-Verbindung

anlage_8_gomopa_abzocker.com_info

anlage_9_gomopa_gesellschaftsmuell.com

anlage_10_juricon_internet_bericht_ber_gomopa

Fingierte “GoMoPa” macht Sexualerziehung für Kinder durch vorbestrafte Serienbetrüger

Die gesamte deutsche Presse verabscheut “GoMoPa”

Presseberichterstatung-zu-Maurischat1

RUFMORD:DIE FREI ERFUNDENEN “GoMoPa”-LÜGEN: FALL PROFESSOR MINISTER STELTER

IMMOVATION AG: Frei erfundene Behauptungen des “Informationsdienstes” GoMoPa im Zusammenhang mit angeblichem Sturz des früheren brandenburgischen Ministers Prof. Schelter – Einstweilige Verfügung beantragt

Kassel (ots) – Erneut wehrt sich die Kasseler IMMOVATION Immobilien Handels AG, ein seit über zwei Jahrzehnten sehr erfolgreiches, bundesweit tätiges Unternehmen der Immobilienbranche, gegen die unverändert anhaltende Schmutzkampagne des sogenannten “Informationsdienstes” GoMoPa (mit Sitz im Ausland), dessen Gründer und “CEO” Klaus Maurischat ebenso wie Mitgründer Mark Vornkahl bereits wegen Betrugs verurteilt wurden. Der 2006 rechtskräftig verurteilte Maurischat gab sogar gegenüber dem Handelsblatt weitere Verurteilungen zu (Handelsblatt vom 07.04.2010), woraufhin das Handelsblatt wörtlich konkludierte: “Es ist allerdings nicht das erste Mal, dass GoMoPa-Vertreter ins Zwielicht geraten”.GoMoPa suggerierte am 16. August 2010 in einer “Pressemitteilung”, dass IMMOVATION-Vorstandsmitglied Lars Bergmann sogar für den Sturz und das Karriereende des früheren brandenburgischen Ministers Professor Dr. Kurt Schelter durch Immobiliengeschäfte verantwortlich zeichne. In diesem Zusammenhang verweist die IMMOVATION AG auf eine schriftliche Mitteilung von Professor Dr. Kurt Schelter vom 18. August 2010:”Diesen Zusammenhang gibt es nicht. Ich kenne Herrn Bergmann nicht und habe mit ihm persönlich keine Immobiliengeschäfte abgeschlossen. Mir ist auch nicht bekannt, dass Herr Bergmann etwa mit Verkäufern der von mir damals erworbenen Immobilien persönlich oder institutionell in Verbindung stand oder steht. Ich halte dies für ausgeschlossen.”Minister a.D. Professor Dr. Kurt SchelterDie IMMOVATION AG hat dieser eindeutigen Mitteilung von Herrn Professor Schelter nichts hinzuzufügen und unterstreicht erneut ihr volles Vertrauen in die Fähigkeit ihrer Klienten, Mitarbeiter und Vertriebspartner, sich selbst ein entsprechendes Bild von dieser Schmutzkampagne machen zu können, in der es dem Autor dieser verleumderischen GoMoPa-”Pressemitteilung” zudem nicht einmal gelang, das Amt des betreffenden Ministers korrekt zu bezeichnen: Im Gegensatz zu seiner Bezeichnung bei GoMoPa war Herr Professor Schelter nicht Finanzminister, sondern Minister der Justiz und für Europaangelegenheiten des Landes Brandenburg.

Die IMMOVATION AG hat im Zusammenhang mit dieser und zahlreichen weiteren unzutreffenden Behauptungen in dieser “Pressemitteilung” heute, 24.08.2010, beim Landgericht Berlin eine einstweilige Verfügung u. a. gegen Goldmann Morgenstern & Partners Consulting LLC (New York) und die GoMoPa GmbH (Berlin) beantragt. Mit der Verfügung soll den Antragsgegnern untersagt werden, die grob diffamierende Pressemitteilung zu verbreiten oder verbreiten zu lassen.

Ausschüttung der Genussrechte

Zum sechsten Mal in Folge schüttete die Kasseler IMMOVATION AG die Rendite aus den Genussrechten an ihre rund 1.500 Anleger in Deutschland und Österreich aus. Über 1,91 Mio. Euro wurden für das Jahr 2009 an die Anleger pünktlich per 31.07.2010 ausbezahlt. Informationen zu weiteren aktuellen Themen finden Sie auf der Homepage der IMMOVATION AG: http://www.immovation-ag.de

Der “freiwillige” Beratungsvertrag zwischen “GoMoPa” und estavis

Die wichtigste Finanzierungsquelle von “GoMoPa” war laut der Teilhaberinformation auch eine Bauträgergesellschaft, gegen die Anwalt Resch im Auftrag von Anlegern vorgegangen war. Deren Muttergesellschaft Estavis schloss einen “freiwilligen Beratervertrag” mit “GoMoPa” – das ist das Strickmuster der Resch-”GoMoPa”-Vorgehensweise…

Schon eigenartig. Da hat Gomopa eine eigene GmbH in Berlin – eine 100 % Tochter der Goldman, Morgenstern & Partners LLC – schliesst aber Verträge mit Erfüllungsort Deutschland mit dem Gerichtsstand New York. Die GmbH bestand bereits zum Zeitpunkt des Vertragsabschlusses.

GoMoPa GmbH, Berlin(Unter den Linden 21, 10117 Berlin). Firma: GoMoPa GmbH Sitz / Zweigniederlassung: Berlin Gegenstand: Die wirtschaftliche Beratung, insbesondere des Mittelstandes, in der europäischen Gemeinschaft unter der Wortmarke GoMoPa. Dazu gehören die Präsentation von Firmen im Internet und anderen Medien, Vermietung von Werbeflächen auch im Internet, die Vermittlung von Handels- und Wirtschaftskontakten und Werbung auch über das Internet sowie das Bereitstellen von Informationen und Portalen im Internet. Stamm- bzw. Grundkapital: 50.000,00 EUR Vertretungsregelung: Ist ein Geschäftsführer bestellt, so vertritt er die Gesellschaft allein. Sind mehrere Geschäftsführer bestellt, wird die Gesellschaft gemeinschaftlich durch zwei Geschäftsführer oder durch einen Geschäftsführer in Gemeinschaft mit einem Prokuristen vertreten. Alleinvertretungsbefugnis kann erteilt werden. Geschäftsführer:; 1. Reski, Peter, *23.12.1952, Verden/Aller; mit der Befugnis die Gesellschaft allein zu vertreten mit der Befugnis Rechtsgeschäfte mit sich selbst oder als Vertreter Dritter abzuschließen Rechtsform: Gesellschaft mit beschränkter Haftung.

========================================================

BERATUNGSVERTRAG

Zwischen der
ESTAVIS AG
Uhlandstrasse 165
D-10719 Berlln
– im folgenden ESTAVIS genannt –
Und

Goldman, Morgenstern & Partners LLC.
575 Madison Avenue, 10th floor
New York, NY 10022-2511
USA
– im folgenden GoMoPa genannt –

I. AUFTRAG UND DURCHFÜHRUNG

1.1 ESTAVIS beauftragt GoMoPa mit der Erarbeitung elnes neuartigen Vertrlebskonzeptes für den Abverkauf Denkmalgeschützter
Immoblilien an eine entsprechende Klientel, die unter zur Hilfenahme des lnternets und unter Einhaltung verbraucherrechtlicher Auflagen geworben werden soll.
1.2. Dazu gehören: Vorschläge zur Herstetlung von Internetseiten und entsprechender Werbung, Kostenberatung, Überwachung
und Einholung entsprechender Angebote, Personalsuche, Verhandlungen mit affilablen Anbietern, Vermittlung von Consutern.
1.3 Die Durchführung erfolgt in enger und ständiger Abstimmung mit einem Vertreter des Vorstands der ESTAVIS AG, sowie
rechtlichen und steuerlichen Beratern der ESTAVIS. GoMoPa wird diesbezüglich entsprechende Vorschläge erarbeiten, die detalllierte und
schriftliche und mündliche Empfehlungen auf Basis der von ESTAVIS angestrebten Zlele beinhalten.
1.4 Weitere Beratungsleistungen GoMoPa’s bezlehen slch nicht auf Rechts- oder Steuerberatung, haben aber Unterhändler
Gespräche sowie die Vermittlung entsprechender Consulter zum Inhalt, jedoch ohne rechtsverbindliche Vollmacht.

2. HONORAR
2.1 Für die Erbringung der genannten Leistunqen zahlt die ESTAVIS an GOMOPA ein Honorar In Höhe von 75.000.- € (Fünfundsiebzigtausend Euro). Das Honorar lst fällig wie folqt:
2.2. Bis zum 21.08.2009 eine Abschlagszahlung In Höhe von 50.000.- Euro. Anschliessend jeweils zum Ende eines Monats (beginnend mit dem August) 5 Teilbeträge in Höhe von jeweils 5.000,- Euro gezahlt. Zahlungen erfolgen gegen Rechnunqsstellung.
2.3. Leistungen, dle eventuell darüber hlnaus zu erbringen sind (eventuelte Reisekosten, Spesen, zusätzliche Aufgaben und
Arbeiten) werden separat und ausschliesslich nach Absprache in Rechnung gestellt und von ESTAVIS gezahlt.

3. SCHLUSSBESTIMMUNGEN

3.1 Sind oder werden einzelne Bestimmungen dieser Vereinbarung unwirksam, so bleibt die Gültigkeit der Vereinbarung im
Übriqen unberührt. Ungültige Bestimmungen sind einvernehmlich durch solche zu ersetzen, die unter Berücksichtigung der Interessenlage den gewünschten wirtschaftlichen Zweck zu erreichen geeignet sind. Entsprechendes gilt für die Ausfüllung von
Lücken, die sich In dieser Verelnbarung etwa herausstellen könnten.
3.2 Aenderungen und Ergänzungen dieser Vereinbarung bedürfen zu ihrer Rechtswirksamkeit der Schriftform. Das Gleiche gilt für
ehe Abbedingung dieser Schriftformklausel.
3.3 Erfülllungsort und ausschliesslicher Gerichtsstand ist New York.

Berlln den, New York den, 13.08.20O9

ESTAVIS AG Goldman Morgenstern & Partners llc
Mozanovski F. Lanz Klaus Maurischat

WIE Sie GoMoPa-Rufmordopfer werden können – Gastbeitrag

Liebe Leserin, lieber Leser!

Stellen Sie sich bitte kurz vor, dass Sie mit einer tollen Geschäftsidee oder einer Geschäftserweiterung zu mehr Geld kommen möchten. Beispielsweise auch Ihr Unternehmen vergrössern oder gar Ihre Waren exportieren wollen.

Sie werben damit natürlich über die Medien….

Da meldet sich bei Ihnen möglicherweise ein Beauftragter des Finanz-Nachrichtendienstes GoMoPa mit der Mitteilung, dass im GoMoPa-Forum sehr negative Forenbeiträge über Ihre Person oder Ihr Vorhaben stünden. Äusserst Schlimmes wir über Sie berichtet. Zum Beispiel, dass Sie bisher schon Ihr Geld mit betrügerischen Machenschaften verdient hätten oder Ihr Sohn als erfolgreicher Sportler nach neuesten Ermittlungen in einem Kokain-Dealer-Ring verwickelt sei.

Ein anonymer User ( Schreiberling) habe dies geschrieben, wird vom GoMoPa-Beauftragten berichtet. Man könne jetzt noch nicht feststellen, ob dies so wahr sei. Man könne aber auch nicht den Beitrag einfach rausnehmen, denn es könne ja auch was Wahres daran sein!

Falls Sie selbst an der Wahrheitsfindung interessiert seien, könnten Sie auch beim ´seriösen Nachrichtendienst` GoMoPa als Gesellschafter oder als Premium-Mitglied einsteigen, dann könne man ja…..usf. …ganz einfach den Beitrag herausnehmen!

So ähnlich könnte es geschehen und glauben Sie mir: ´Dies ist kein böser Traum,-keine Fata Morgana`, sondern schon Zigtausendmal in der fast 10-Jährigen GoMoPa- Geschichte so abgelaufen.

Wir, von der CSA-Agency, wurden selbst aus Wettbewerbsgründen seit 2002 von GoMoPa auf primitivste Weise im Forum diffamiert oder die von uns als seriöse Dienstleister empfohlenen Unternehmungen wurden per Rufmord mit schmutzigsten, unwahren Verleumdungs-Attacken von anonymen Bloggern ( bezahlte Helfershelfer vom GoMoPa) nahezu ruiniert. Nicht nur finanziell , sondern auch gesundheitlich nieder gemacht! Nicht umsonst heisst es RUFMORD.

Der Begriff ´Stalking` ist da noch eine vornehme Bezeichnung.

Auf gut deutsch passt Rufmord besser.

Geschäftlicher und gesundheitlicher RUFMORD gehört auch entsprechend bestraft.

Die Justiz tut sich sehr schwer damit. Vor allem, wenn die Rufmörder mit Ihren Machenschaften mit Gesellschaften wie z.B. ´GoMoPa` als Briefkastenfirma aus dem Ausland agieren. UND zum anderen, weil sich die Stalking-Terror-Experten von GoMoPa sich mit ihren Methoden auch der Justiz und der Medien bedienen.

Die seriöse Alternative zu systematischem Rufmord

Seriöse Aufklärung hilft!Auch der zuweilen personell überforderten Justiz kann mit entsprechender Aufklärung zum Hintergrund der Go-Mafia ´GoMoPa` und ihrem Paten Klaus Maurischat geholfen werden!

Bitte, Freunde der Gerechtigkeit, helft mit, dem grausigen ´GoMoPa-Rufmord-Terror ein baldiges Ende zu bereiten!

Unterstützt die ´BAG-Illus, den BUND anonyme Gerechtigkeit`

Schaut Euch die Rufmord-Methoden der GoMoPa-Mafia mit ihrem Paten Klaus Maurischat an. Hier zur BAG-Website www.123bagillus.com

Hier zu den aktuell aufgeführten Rufmord-Beispielen http://tinyurl.com/6h5zttc

Hier der Link zum BAG-Blog http://123bagillus.wordpress.com/

Ihr CSA-Agency-Aufklärer Martin Sachs

( Seit 2002,- dem GoMoPa-Terror-Beginn rufmordgeschädigt, in der Existenz nahezu vernichtet, siehe Beispiel oben / ständig mit dem Tode per Mailattacken bedroht, unter anderer Identität lebend…)

csa-partner-as@safe-mail.net

“GoMoPa” -WIE BEI DEN NAZI-STASIS-ERST DER RUFMORD – DANN DER MORD

WIE BEI DEN NAZI-STASI-ERST DER RUFMORD – DANN DER MORD

Die “GoMoPa”-Opfer-Liste

Liebe Leser,

über 3.400 Menschen und Firmen wurden und werden von STASI-”GoMoPa” gestalkt und erpresst.

Dies hat zu einem – so erste Schätzungen von Schadensexperten – Schaden von über € 1 Milliarde geführt, nimmt man als Berechnungsgrundlage

die im Falle von Meridian Capital geforderte Erpressungssumme.

Der immaterielle Schäden durch zerstörte menschliche Leben und Schicksale, dieser “Dämonen im Internet” (Eigenbezeichnung von Ober-Stalker “Klaus Maurischat”) ist noch viel höher und nur mit dem von der DDR-Gestapo angerichteten Schaden vergleichbar, deren Nachfolgeorganisation die fingierten “Goldman, Morgenstern u. Partner” – “GoMoPa” zweifelsohne sind.

Darunter sind auch etliche Todesfälle und viele Personen und Firmen, die nicht auf der 3.400 Fälle umfassenden “Warnliste”, besser Stalking, Betrugs- und Erpresserliste auftauchen.

Hinzu kommen zahlreiche Fälle von Börsenmanipulation wie im Falle “Wirecard” mit Pennystocks aus der US-Corporation-Schmiede von “GoMoPa”-Partner  “Graf” “Dr.” Stenbock.

Organisierte Kriminalität im ganz grossen Stil.

DIE “GoMoPa”-Opferliste 2010 – getarnt als “Warnliste” von den erfundenen “Goldman, Morgenstern u. Partnern” erstellt

Folgende Firmen und Personen wurden u.a. von Peter Ehlers (wenn er denn so heisst) und “GoMoPa”, dem STASI-”NACHICHTENDIENST” seit Jahresanfang 2010– ohne jeden Beweis – verunglimpft, um daraus Profit für Ihren postkommunistischen Saftladen zu schlagen:

GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
2
 Anton
 Abdul Sheikh
 Abraham
 Akcay
 Aksoy
 Aktürk
 Alexandre
 Alsguth
 Arnold
 Arnol Arslan
 Artschwager
 A & G Insurance Corporation
A & O Finanz- und Immobilenvertriebsservice GmbH
A+B Finanz
A+K Fina
 AA Capital
 ABAG BETEI
 Abbey House Acquisitions
 ABC Finanzdienst
 Accent-Finanz GmbH
 ACCENTA IMMOBILIEN MANAGEMENT AG
 ACI Alternative Capital Invest GmbH
 Acoreus Collection Service
 Acorn Consulting
 Activ 3000 GmbH
 Activa GmbH
 Activa Wirtschaftsberatung GmbH
 Actiwa Vermittlung von Finanz- und Vorsorgekonzepten e.K.
 Adeshieman Company
 Aditus Fonds GbR
 Admus AG
 Adolph & Komorsky International GmbH
 Advance Invest AG
 ADVANCE INVEST AG S.A.
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
3
 Advanced Group Kuwait
 Advanced Program Trading AG
 Advin Consult Finanzierungsvermittlungs GmbH
 Advisa Consulting GmbH
 Aeternus Energy Corp
 AFG AMERICAN FINANCIAL GROUP INC.
 Agentur Herold
 Agentur Leif Schurig
 AGR Allgemeine Gewerbedatei e.K.
 Ahorn Trust AG
 AIF Bank & Trust Company
 AJPA Broker SA
 Akeman Capital
 AKJ Allgemeine Leasing AG
 AKJ Privatfinanz AG
 AKJ-Firmengruppe
 AKK Dienstleistungs GmbH
 Aktienpower AG
 AktienPowerMarketing GmbH
 Akzenta AG
 Albion Investment Management
 Alexander Freiherr von Pillnitz & Berenberg Treuhandgesellschaft 1908 Limited
 Allgemeine Giro 24 GmbH
 ALLGEMEINE IMMOBILIEN-BÖRSE GmbH
 ALMO Hausbau GmbH
 Alpha Finanzsanierungs GmbH
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
4
 Alpha Oil Inc.
 Alphapool AG
 Alpina Finanz GmbH
 Alternative Capital Invest
 ALV Auto-Leasing und Vermietungs GmbH
 Alvino Group
 AMBROS/VBS
 American Investment & Finance Corporation
 AMK Akustikbau GmbH
 AMK Immobilienbetreuung GmbH
 Anderson & Goldberg S. L.
 Anderson McCormack Group S.L
 Anderton Stoner&Partner
 Anglo African Minerals plc
 Ango-Käufer-Service GmbH & Co. KG
 Antassia GmbH
 Anthony & Carter
 Apex Investments Corporation
 Apex Trading Group
 Applied Cash International
 APT Advanced Program Trading AG
 Aquaorbis AG
 ARCADIA Finanz- & Wirtschaftsberatung
 Arena GmbH
 Argos Finanz GmbH
 Ario AG
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
5
 Armaco
 Art Bauträger u. Immobilienhandelsgesellschaft mbH
 Artemis Financial
 AS Bau Berlin
 ASC AG für Satellitenkommunikation
 ASCANIA Vermögensverwaltung
 Ascor Media Ltd.
 ASG GmbH
 Assecura-Assecuranz Vermittlungs GmbH
 Associated Management Group
 Associated Management Group (AMG Zurich)
 Aston Rowe Consulting Advisory
 Atlantis Exploration AG
 Atlantis-Genossenschaft
 Au Vi Product GmbH
 Aufina Holding
 Aurora Gold Corp.
 Australian Lottery
 Autosafe Parkhaus AG
 Autotester 24
 AVAG Allgemeine Vermögensverwaltung AG
 AVAG-Funds
 AVD AG
 AVM AG
 AvW Invest AG
 AXXIOM AG
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
6
 Azalenia Basel AG
 Amaxopoulus
 Arntzen
 Aniol
 Altmann, Dr.
 Assenmacher
 Appel
 Aulenbach
 Aengenheister
 Amonath
 Asmus
 Almer
 Anlauf
 Aniol
 Blon von
 Barney
 Bajcar
 Bronischewski
 Butler
 Becker
 Berger
 Burat
 Buettner
 Behring
 Baumert
 Becker
 Bünning
 Bok
 Bahcecioglu
 Bahceli
 Balicioglu
 Balogh
 Barteczko
 Becker
 Bergenthal
 Bindokat
 Böhrer
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
7
 Born
 Bortstein
 Busch
 Böhm
 Braun
 Blum
 B u. S Technologie GmbH
 Bachmann Roth Advisory
 Badenia Bausparkasse
 Bagleys Investment Company
 Baltica Savings & Investment Cop.
 Bank Leumi AG
 Bankgesellschaft Berlin
 Banque Bruxelles Lambert (BBL)
 Barlow & Ramsey
 Barringer and Co.
 Basel Institutional
 Basic Trading Solution Ltd.
 Bau- und Grund Immobilien GmbH
 Bauconsult Gesell. für Haus- u. Grundbesitz
 Baucontrol GmbH
 Baufinanzierungszentrum Berlin – Karlshorst
 BAV-Konzept Versicherungsmakler GmbH
 Bavaria Invest Finanzmanagement
 Bavaria Trading Company
 Baye Invest
 BÖRSENPOWER Coaching und Verwaltungsges.m.b.H.
 BBAP Assekuranzmakler & Finanzdienstleistungs GmbH
 BeFa Invest GbmH & Co KG
 BelSwissBank
 BEMA Investitions- und Beteiligungsgesellschaft GmbH
 Benedict Lifeline GmbH
 BENEDICT Star GmbH
 Benitex AG
 Benson & Raymond Acquisition
 Berger Daniel
 Bergues Invest SA
 Bestgambling.Com
 BESTLIFESELECT AG
 BF Bayerische Baufinanz GmbH
 BFS Neckarsulm
 BFTS AG Schweiz
 BHG Baugenossenschaft Hockenheim e.G
 BIK Bauträger
 Biotech Development
 Bishop & Parkes Advisory
 Blanc & Baumar
 Blinder International
 BLISTER YACHTING GMBH
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
8
 Bloomfield Consulting AG
 Bond and Future Group Ltd.
 Bonetti & Wilmers
 Bonus Bauträgergesellschaft mbH
 Borsa Financial Inc.
 BR Consultance Alfaz S.L.
 Branchenklick
 Branko Financial Service
 BRAZIL-INVEST-VC LTDA
 RDS-Dienstleistungen
 Breadley Steigenberger & Partner (BSP)
 BREBA Invest S.L.
 Brentana Wohnbau GmbH
 Brett Commodities GmbH
 Bright Capital Banker Ltd
 Britannia Swiss Equities – BSE AG
 Brodowski Dach- und Fassadenbau GmbH
 Brodowski und Deyna Immobilien GmbH
 Brokers Society Sociedad de Gesti? Tramitaci Financier
 Brown & Lampe U.S. Portfolio Management Ltd.
 BSD GmbH
 Bullion Trading Group
 Bund der Verbraucher (BDV)
 Burbach Consulting GmbH
 Business Partner Credit GmbH
 Brauer
 Bogatz
 Birner
 Bastert
 Baeuerle
 Bertges
 Barteczko
 Bertges
 Beyer
 Bogatz
 Bender
 Bens
 Bösebeck
 Bouderi
 Baan
 Bender
 Birkins
 BECK
 Barthel
 Beyreuther
 Banghard
 Bohrmann
 Bauer
 Bludau
 Bajcar
 Bernhart
 Belkenheid
 Barthel
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
9
 Baumbach
 Barde
 Casula
 Carsten
 Celik
 Cengiz
 Clemann
 Cura
 Cuti
 Cuti
 Campa
 C & P Mutual
 C. Gewerbeimmobilien
 Callux Forderungsmanagement
 Calvin & Sanderson Associates
 Cambridge Asset Management AG
 Cameron Poe & Associates Inc.
 CAP-NETWORK AG
 Capital Securities International
 Capitalinform Limited SA
 Capitalinform Limited SA
 Car Leasing Agency Ltd.
 Carsten Haus GmbH
 Carver Brooks & Associates Ltd.
 Cash Group AG
 Cash-Immobilien GmbH
 Cashselect
 CasMaker Ltd.
 Castor Capital
 Cater & Sattler OHG
 Caviar Creator Inc
 CB Freie Versicherungsmakler GmbH
 CBC
 CDH AG
 Census Grund GmbH & Co KG
 Centracon
 Centracon Investment AG
 Centro Euro Service AG
 Centro Euro Service AG
 Centro-Service GmbH
 Ceptum AG
 Ceres Warenhandels- und Beratungsgesellschaft mbH
 Certus Consulting
 CH Devisen Macht SA
 CHEAPLY SMOKING CLUB
 Chiemgauer Vermögensverwaltung
 Chips Virtual Casino
 CIC Insurance Company SA
 Cinerenta Gesellschaft für Internationale Filmproduktion mbH
 Cis Deutschland AG
 City Hyp Finanzierungsvermittlung
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
10
 City Zins Finanzierungsvermittlungs AG
 CL Inkasso AG
 CL Inkasso AG
 Clean Lease GmbH
 CLEAN PATENT GMBH
 Club Alanzo VIP Cruises
 CMP Global Consulting Ltd
 CMX Capital Markets Exchange AG
 CNP Casino
 Colebrooke Management Holdings
 Color für Kinder e.V.
 Comitas Agentur VSV
 Commercial Development Bank
 Commercial First Trading Corporation
 Complete Commodity Trading
 Comroad AG
 ComTex Vermögens- und Verwaltungs GmbH
 OMVAL Capital AG
 Concorde International – Business Consultants
 Condor Gold and Minerals Inc.
 Conductis GmbH
 Conik Invest
 Coninvest Finanz AG
 Conradi & Hilger Gbr mbH
 Consens Gesellschaft für Projektentwicklung u. Vermittlung von Immobilien
 Consolidated Capital Management Limited (CCML)
 Content Services Ltd.
 Contracta Grundstücksmanagement GmbH
 Convent Consulting GmbH
 CONVERGEX CARIBBEAN, LTD.
 Conzeptfinance Ltd.
 Cooperativa Extranjero de Credito y Investiamento SA
 Cornhill Management S.L.
 Cosena Management S.L.
 CP Medien AG
 CPTD – Central Patent & Trademark Database
 CR Consulting GmbH
 Credit for you Limited
 Credit Mirabaud
 Creditnet Bank Internationale
 CS Capital Service GmbH
 CST Umwelttechnik und Innovation e.G.
 Cumulus Gesellschaft für Immobilien- Investitionen mbH
 Cura Investitions- und Beteiligungsgesellschaft
 Cmok
 Cordes
 Chuen
 Drabnitzke
Dana
Dogs
Doll
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
11
Doujak
Dziuba
Dorsch
Becker
DAK Finanz
Danaro Invest
Asset Management
DAT Finance AG
DBVI AG
De Lotto Switzerland
Delmont Wealth Management
Deltoton AG
DEM Marketing
Demirok GmbH Bauunternehmen
Densch & Schmidt GmbH
Der Informant GmbH
Deutsche Contracting GmbH
Deutsche Immobilien Grundvermögen Holding AG
Deutsche Mentor für Finanzen (DMFF) e.K.
Deutsche Mentor für Finanzen AG
Deutschen Anlage- und Beteiligungs Aktiengesellschaft (Dabag)
Develop Management GmbH
Deyna Immobilien GmbH
DHB-Dreiländer-Handels und Beteiligungsgesellschaft Walter Fink KG
Die Agentur
Die Tradergemeinschaft – Best of Marketing SARL
Dierig Unternehmensberatung
DIHA Dienstleistungs – und Handel GmbH
DIP AG
DIREKTE VERMÖGENSBERATUNGSGESELLSCHAFT MBH
Direkter Anlegerschutz e.K.
Distefora Holding AG
Dividium Capital Ltd
DLF-Immobilienportfolio-Walter-Fink KG
DM Beteiligungen AG
DMI Derivatives Management Inc.
DMP-Gruppe
DMV – Deutsche Markenverlängerungs GmbH
Dohmen-Invest
Domizil Immobilien Leasing GmbH
Domusfinanz
Dow Win Financial Group Corporation
DPMV-Deutsche Patent- und Markenverlängerung GmbH
Dr. Antonio GAMPA
Dr. Bassam Bouderi
Dr. Cornelius Gregorius Consulting Inc
Dr. Gerbig Treuhand GmbH
Dr. Görlich Grundbesitzbeteiligungs GmbH
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
12
Dr. Hanne Grundstücks GmbH
Dr. Hartmannsdorf Immobilien GmbH
Dr. Mayer & Cie. GmbH
Dr. Peters
Dr. Schmitt Inc.
Dr. Werner Financial Service AG
Dragon Partners Inc.
Dreiländerfonds DLF
Dreiländerfonds DLF-94/17
Drexel Management GmbH
Dubai International Investment & Trading
Dubai-1000-Hotel-Fonds
Duesenberg Financial Group Inc.
Dunas de Corralejo S.L.
Dupont Conseille AG
Dux Partners AG
Dörflinger
Dallüge
Deutsch
Dittel
Dierkes
Deubelbeiss
Dallinger
Drewitz
Eichhorn
Erber
Elbert
Ebner
Eroglu
Eschinger
Ettelt
Evcil
E-Money Power (EMPFX)
E.U.R.O.- Unternehmens- & Wirtschaftsberatungs- Ltd.
EAG AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT für WIRTSCHAFT
Earnshaw Advisory Services
Earthsearch Communications Inc.
Easy Concept Hamburg KG ( E@sy )
EBC AG
EBCON – Europäische Verbraucherberatung
Ebcon Europäische Verbraucherberatung AG
Ecco
Economy Capital Corporation
Ecotrend Holding AG
ECP Euro Caribbean Properties Ltd.
ECTO GmbH
Ecumoney Limited
Edgar Heumann GmbH
EECH AG
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
13
EEIG – Europäische Wirtschaftskammer
Effekten- und Edelmetallberatungs GmbH
Effinance Private Equity AG
EKC
Elbe Emissionshaus
Elefant Immobilien GmbH
EM.TV AG
EMA Event Management Agentur GmbH
Embdena
Emmerson Bennett
Empresa Minera (Bergbau) AG
Enexoma AG
Equinox Private Consultants Ltd.
ERGO-Plan
Erich Holderer Finanzdiestleistungen
ESKATA Finanz- Immobilien- Handels GmbH
ESTEKAR LIMITED
Estreel GmbH & Co.KG
EuMedien
Eurefi Eurefi Holding AG
Euregio Immobilien L&F B.V.
EURENTA Gesellschaft für Anlagen-, Renten- und Sparkonzeptionen GmbH
EURENTA Gesellschaft für Marketing- und Promotion GmbH
Euring GmbH
EURO CREDIT UNION
EURO Finanz Consult AG
Euro Finanz Management
Euro Kapital AG
Euro Real Investment Company
Euro Trading GmbH
Euro-American Beteiligungsvermittlungsg. MbH
EURO-CONSULT e.K.
Euro-Pool AG
EUROCAPITAL BANK INC.
Eurocapital Investment Corporation
EURODOM Berlin GmbH
Eurogoldtrader
Eurokapital AG
Eurolink Consult GmbH
European Estates&Investment AG
European Kings Club
European Trade marks and Designs
European Trademark Organisation S.A.
Europäische Schuldenregulierungs- und Ausgleichsanstalt
Europäische Wirtschaftskammer für Handel, Gewerbe und Industrie
EUROTRADE & CONSULTING AG
Eurotrust Capital Management
EV&K
Evantus Invest
EVD Direktverkaufs AG
EWR Wirtschaftsdatenregister
Exakt Martkanalysen Research GmbH
Exeltrade
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
14
Engels
Eder
Esser
Elas
Ehrenberg
Eilts
Eich
Eich
Eder
Engler
EISENBERG
 Felgner
Flug
Feyh
Freke
Florian
Fasan
Fritsch
Freiherr von Fink
Fink
Ferrera Dr. F & P Aktiengesellschaft & Co. KG
F.I.P. GmbH
F.V.F
FA. Haustein Finanzvermittlung
Fafa Capital
Faktor 1 GmbH
Falcon Euro Trading Limited
Falcon Oil Group
Falk Capital AG
Falk-Gruppe
Falken Depot Management GmbH
Falken GmbH
Falken Vermögensverwaltung GmbH
FALLON BANCROFT HOLDING
Fashionact Industries Inc.
Noske
FB Bauträger GmbH
FDMV FINANZDIENSTLEISTUNGEN
FFB Dörflinger GmbH
FFCC Verwaltungs GmbH & Co. Finanzdienstleistungs KG
FG Finanz-Service AG
FGP & Cie
Fibeg Finanzberatung- und Vermögensverwaltungs GmbH
Fibu AG
Fideles & Associates AG
Fidelity International
FIDU payment services S.A.
Finama Vermögensverwaltungs KG
Finance Concept GmbH
Finance Service International
Financial Consulting
Financial Consulting UK Limited
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
15
Financial Planning Systems Ltd.
Financieros Panama – Societaet Rodriguez Batista Diaz
Finanz Score GbR
Finanz Service Hennig
Finanzprogramme Bentley & Partner
FINANZtest Center
Finanzvermittlung Fritz Guth
Finanzvermittlung und Wirtschaftsdienst Ott GmbH
Finbrands Global Limited
Fine Trading Group Finvest Asset Management
FIPTR Federated Institute for Patent- &
Trademark Registry First Canadian Joint Venture
& Consulting Inc. First Canadian Joint Venture
& Consulting Inc. (Canada)
First China Corporate Management Group
First Garant Fund AG First Intercontinental
Bancorp. Ltd. First Invest Grundbesitz
GmbH First Invest Swiss Trade
First Real Estate Grundbesitz GmbH
First Saxonia Trading Ltd
Flash Finance Floris Bank
FOCUS Immobilien und Projektbau GmbH
FOKUS INVEST AG Foma Internationale
Inkassogesellschaft mbH
Fondax Capital Trust GmbH & Co. KG
Fondshaus Hamburg FORBIS Corporation
Force Worldwide Investments Corp
Foreign Exchange Clearing House Ltd.
Forest Finance Service GmbH
Forex4free Forexone-Broker
Forst Finance AG Four Stars AG
Frankonia Sachwert AG FRD International
Free Finance -Service Futura Finanz AG
Futura-Concept GmbH FXTSwiss
Fridez Fridez
Frau Floßbach
Fritz Franko
Frerichs Fink
Fridez Fasan
Filsinger
Freiherr von Lepel
Frydenlund Foetzsch
Fridez Fridez
Fitz
Grüters
Geyer
Gonnes
Grüner
Gerlach
Gast
Gräbedünkel
Gustav

GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
16
Güttig
Gläßer
Gehle
Gerome
GOLDEN-BALLARIN
Golsch
Gronemeyer
Görlich
Götzl
Gaber
Graupner
Guth
G+M Baubetreuung GmbH
G.V.V. bR.
G.W.F. Grundwert-Bauträger G.M.B.H
Gaiacor International PLC
Galant Immobilien GmbH
Garant Kreditvermittlung
Garant-Hundsdorff-Istanbul
GEBAB
Gebrüder Schmidtlein GbR
GEcoS Holding AG
Geldfinder GmbH
Gemas GmbH
Genius Insurance Service GmbH
Genius Investments – Genius Funds
Geoteck Inc.
Gerd Esser Grundbesitz GmbH
GerGermania Grundbesitz AG
Germania Venture Capital AG
Gesellschaft für Erbenermittlung
Gesellschaft für Exklusive Veranstaltungen Dortmund mbH
Gesellschaft für Finanz- u. Wirtschaftsdienstleistungen (FiWi)
Gesellschaft zur Datensicherung im Internet (GSDI)
Gesellschaft zur Vermittlung kapitalorientierter Finanzanlagen GmbH (GVFK)
GetAssisted Group
GfS Invest GmbH
GGHF Windpark Sitten GmbH & Co. KG
GHS Unternehmensgruppe
GIP Grundstücks-Immobilien & Projektmanagement GmbH
GIV Gesellschaft für Immobilien und Vermögensverwaltung mbH
Glatt & Partner GmbH
GLOBAL – BAU Immobilien GmbH
Global AWS AG
Global Capital Group
Global Cogenix Industrial Corp.
Global Financial Invest AG
Global Foreign Exchange (Switzerland) AG
GLOBAL LIFESTYLE GROUP S.A.
Global Mineral Resources Corp.
Global Pension Plan
Globaltraiding.com Kapitalmanagement
Globalus (Immobilien) Gmbh & Co. KG
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
17
GM Capital Partners
GMF Finanz AG
GMF Treuhandgesellschaft mbH
GO AHEAD SERVICE LTD
GOJ AG
Gold-Barren-Silber.com
Gold-Versandhandel
Goldstein & Partner Inc.
GOT Thimm GmbH
GPS GmGrand Capital Ltd
Great Berlin Wheel GmbH & Co. KG
Grevenreuth AG
Grund und Boden Beteiligungs AG
Grundstücksgemeinschaft Arslan
Grupo Esdinero
Grünewälder GmbH
GSM Gesellschaft für Professionelles Sachwert Management AG
GSM Gesellsc
GTO Gap Trading Online
Gulf Oil Exploration Inc.
GVW – Wirtschaftsclub
GWG Gesellschaft für Wirtschaftsplanung mbH
Göttinger Gruppe
Göttler Finanz AG
Graf
Guillaume
Gropper
Göker
Grotelaers
Günzel
Gelbke
Haugg
Halbey
Händel
Hansen
Heise
Hensel
Hipp
Hirner
Hirth
Heider
Hickl
Hansel
Hauser
Härtel
Heckler
Hambusch Prof.
Herold
Hering Dr.
Herr Budzinski
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
18
Heyer
Hering Dr.
Hartung
Hesselmann
Hettrich
Heiner
Händel
Heinrich
Hartl
Hansch
Hartung
Hepp
Heinekken van
Hanne
Heiliger
Heumann
Hensley-Piroth
Haffa
Holderer
Helfer
Heckmann
Hormann
Hennig
Hermsmeier
Hornberger
Halabi
Herr Gieselmann
Hundsdorff
Hanisch
Hornig
Hambusch Prof.
H.R.L. International
H2O Swiss AG
Hafenstein Marketing GmbH
Hamburg Connection
Hamilton Associates A.G.
Handelshaus Schaar
Handelskontor Fischer
Hansa Treuhand
Hanse Capital
Hanse Club
Hanseatische AG
Hanseatische Senatorenkanzlei
Hansefina GmbH
Hartl Immobilien
Hartl Immobilienmanagement GmbH
Harz Börde Finanz
Haus- und Vermögensverwaltung GmbH (HaVeWa)
Hauser Treuhand Rorschach HTR
Haushaltsfuchs
HB Capital Partners
HBW-Finanz AG
HCI Capital
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
19
HDL Hausdienstleistungsgesellschaft mbH
Helvag AG
Helvetia Treuhand GmbH
Helvetia Treuhand-Union GmbH
Hentsch & Müller S.A.
Hermes Beteiligungs AG
Hermes Portfolio Management GmbH
Bens
HKA-Bank 1954 Ltd.
HNH Finanzberatung-Treuhand GmbH
Horn Wolfgang Dr.
HouseFX AG
HTB Holding
HuHWH International AG
Hypo – Leasing B.V.
Heinen
Hagen
Hoff
Hensel
Hampe
Hauser Metzler
Harksen
Huber
Hartung
Hübner
Hönnscheidt
Hettrich
Hering Dr.
Hettrich
Hübner
Ihl
Izmirlioglu
Izmirlioglu
Immega
I-investorclub Ltd.
I.B.F.T.P.R. International Bureau for Federated Trademark Patent Register
I.B.I.P. International Bureau for Intellectual Property
I.F.I. Ltd. Milincic
IAZ & Partners
IBB GmbH
IBB INTERNATIONAL
IBEKA Immobilienbeteiligung AG
IBH Limited
ICB – Intercontinental Brokerage Corporation
ICM Basel
IContent GmbH
Idee Immo Concept GmbH
Idilei-Treuinvest
IFF AG Zukunftsunternehmen für Investment, Fonds, Finanzen
IFIC Integra Financial Consulting GmbH
IFS International Financial Services Inc.
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
20
IHB Immobilien Heinen & Biege GmbH
IKF
Immorenta Immobilienbeteiligungsgesellschaft mbH
Imperia Invest IBC
Indara Projekt AG
Indices International Group IIG
Info-ZentralInformations-Service-Center (ISC)
Inkasso Team Moskau / TMA GmbH
Innoflex
Innovatio Allfinanz & Franchise System AG
INT Elektrizitätswerk Beteiligungs KG
Integral Finanz AG
Integral Treuhand Vermögensverwaltung GmbH
Integro Capital Partners
Intellectual Property Agency Ltd.
Inter Alpen AG
Inter Capital Bank
Inter Capital Bank Ltd.
Inter Credit Group
Interbank Asset Management Group AG / InterBank AG
Intercontinental Financial Developments Plc.
Interessensgemeinschaft Barbara Merkens
Interfinance Investment & Credits
Interglob AG
INTERMEX International Ltd.
International Bioremediation Services Inc.
International Insurance Holding Inc.
International Invest Ltd
International Travel Services Ltd.
Internet Media AG
Internetwebshop
Inventaire Pro
Inveractivos
InvestInvestor Relations Corp.
Inveteratus Asset Management
IOPTS International Organization for Patent & Trademark Service Corporation
IPS AG – Internationale Produktvermarktungs Systeme
ISR Management & Consulting Ltd
ISS Immobilien Schutz und Service AG (ISS AG)
ISS Immobilienschutz und Service AG
ITL-Enterprises Inc.
Immega
Ibekwe
Just
Jochum
Jester
Junges
Jaeger Research GmbH
Jefferies Associates Group
Jejkal AG Strategische Investments
Johnsons Banking Group
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
21
Johnsons Banking Group
Joseph Cooke Ltd.
Julius Brown AG
Jump
Jachnicki
Jaufmann
Jansson
Jonas
Jedlitschka
Junghänel
Junghänel
Junghänel
Juratsch
Jentzer
Jilg
Jung
Karabunar
Kriewald
Knobloch
Kinner
Käner
Kontze
Kratz
Kostas
Körner
Keffel – Fallahi
Kaiser
Klein
Klaas
Krenzer
Kletsch
Kappes
Kloiber
Kiehl
Kappes
KlaffenböcKraushaar
Kleefisch
Krefft
Klaffenböck
Kaltofen
Kühnen
K & S -Frisia
K&K. B. P. Vermögensverwaltung
K1 Group
K1-Group
Kaikatsu Group
Kanzlei Knil
Kanzlei Range & Partner
Kapital-Consult GmbH
Karriere AG
Köllner-Unternehmensgruppe
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
22
König & Cie
KCP Bank
Kingside Establishment
Kirkland Lee
KK ImmobilienFonds I AG & Co. KG a.A.
Kleeblatt4U
Koch & Eilts GmbH & Co. KG
Koh-I-Noor
Konnex ImmoInvest GmbH
Konsumgüter Direktvertrieb e.V
Kredit einfach Vermittlungs GmbH
Krug Immobilien GmbH
KSF Korrespondenz-Service für Finanzsysteme
KSK International Ltd.
KubKusch und Partner GmbH
Kutag Capital Partners AG
Kutag Group
Kuwait Finance & Investment Company
KVG Internationale Kapitalvermittlung
KVV-Profi Management- und Beteiligung AG
KWD-Marketing
Kühne Bauspar- und Finanzierungsfachbüro
Küng & Partner Vermögensverwaltung AG
Klaffenböck
Klostermann
Keiner
Klappenbach
Klappenbach
Kastler
Kuzmanovic
Kraus
Keil
Kulecki
Kahnhäuser
Klein
Kuhlee
Karabunar
K.
Knobloch
Kiok
Klinge
Koehn
Kuhlen
Lebinger
Lorenz
Luft
Lampe
Leonhard
LehnoLohmann
Lohmann
Lee
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
23
Leindecker
Lökkevik
Lucky Prices S.L.
Lepel Freiherr von
Lemke
Linder
Littig
Langanke
Limburg
Laubach
Lins
Lüthi
LAM Immobilien- und Beteiligungs AG
Landesbank Berlin – LBB/IBV Fonds
Landmark Invest Ltd.
Lange Vermögensberatung GmbH
Lange Vermögensberatung GmbH
Langenbahn AG
LBB-Fonds
LDG Capital Markets Company Limited
Lenz Immobilienhandel AG
Life
Lifetime Products Inc.
Liquid Asset Management Inc.
Lisser Consulting
Litz United GmbH & Co. KG
Locat – Projektsteuerung GmbH
Locstein Asset Management AG
Logotype Klostermann, Lässig
London Hong Kong Exchange plc
LPA Financial Services
LSC. Ltd.
Ltd. Ifi
LVA Garant Fund Inc.
Lichtenfels
Lenz
Leuze
Lengdorfer
Lutz
Marien
Möbius
Müller
Müller
Mohm
Morgenstern
Markof
Müller Dr.
Mathy
Müller
Miersch
Matten
24
Moulatsiotis
MichalMatthiesen
Milincic
Matthies
Merkens
Marx
Meyer
Madden Group Inc.
Magnus GmbH&CO KG
MALAYSIA Credit
Malaysiacredit Van Bergen Corp.
Mallorca Trading
Malmsbury, Harrington and Seaford
Maonara AG
Marine Shuttle AS
Marine Shuttle Operations Inc.
Mark Marketing S.R.O.
Matic-Verlagsgesellschaft mbH
Matterhorn International
Mayer und Cie GmbH
MC Management Consulting & Financial Services
MCC Mariaux Chevre & Cie
McKenzie-Boyle Associates
Med-Synergy Mallorca GmbH & Co. KG
Media Concepte
Media Inkassomanagement AG
Media-Com LTD & Co. KG
Medivest
MEG AG
Mercaforex – Silver Holdings International Ltd.
Mercantus AG
Mercury Forex Investments Assets Ltd.
Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd
METROPOL LEASING GMBH
MFIVE Ltd.
MFS 24
MG Beteiligungs AG
MICONA LTD.
MidAtlantic Holdings plc
Minera Real del Barqueno S.A.
Mitschka Alternative Advisory
MJS Developments S.A.
MK Service & Vertrieb
MK- Service & Vertrieb
MMC Medialog Marketing Company
MMCIS Investments
Mobilica.de
MOLY-FLON LIMITED
Money and Capital ASS.
Money Plus Worldwide Financial Limited
MonMach Marine Insurance Company Ltd.
Morgan Franklin Investment Inc.
MPC Capital
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
25
MPC Capital AG
Mueller Capital Management (MCM)
Multi Advisor Fund I GbR
MWB Vermögensverwaltungs AG
Mehler
MÖLLER-BÜCKINS
Montag
Morris
Manns
Meyer
Mundt
MILLS
McGregor
Müller
 Nicolic
Noske
Neumann
Naumann
Nieder
Noske
Nitsche
Natea Financial Transactions Division
Nationales Markenregister AG
Natur- und Erlebniswelt Schmölln GmbH
NEO TECH PUBLISHING COMPANY INC.
Net Mobile AG
Netsolutions FZE
NEUBERT & PARTNER FINANZMANAGEMENT GMBH
Neuburg Financial AG
Neue Medien GmbH
New Century Capital
NEW Naturpark und Erlebniswelt Schmölln
New World Financial
Newton Forest
Noble Advisory Group
Nodorf und Partner
Non plus ultra Marketing GmbH
Nord Finanz KG
Nord-Analyse/Jürgen Harksen
Nordcapital
Norddeutsche Vermögensverwaltung
North Am GmbH
NOVI BETEILIGUNGS GMBH
NUEVO GMBH
NWK Consulting
NYTS New York Trading Services Ltd.
Nünlist
Noack
 Ohles
Ohlmann
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
26
Obermann
Ohlenschläger
Ottersbach
O Online Casino
OBA OBJEKTPLANUNGS UND BAUGESELLSCHAFT MBH
Obtime GmbH
Ocean s Continental AG
EKOFINANZ PIPER & FISCHER (ÖKOFINANZ)
Offshore Shuttle AS
Olaf Tank – Rechtsanwalt
OLF OBERLAUSITZER FACTORING UND LEASING GMBH
OMNIKRON VERWALTUNGSGESELLSCHAFT MBH
Soldwisch
Optimal-Unternehmensgruppe
Opus one Corporation
Organi Juris GmbH
ORGANIJURIS HOLDING AG
Ost Com Holding AG
Ownership Emissionshaus
Ommer
Oberle
Olek
 Petrenko
Prehn
Piroth
Pelz
Pfeiffer
Piroth
Pirkel
Pirkel
Petsch
Pröckel
Pirkel
Pilling
Pirkel
Paco Integrated Energy Inc.
Pacon Capital S.A.
Pacta Invest GmbH
PACTA-INVEST GmbH
Partner Air Limited
Partner-Computer-Group Ltd.
PayPay Inc.
PayPay S.a.r.l.
PCG
Pentafox Höhn OHG
Pepper United S.R.O.
Perfect4u
Pharma Kontor AG
Phillip Alexander Securities & Futures Ltd.
Phoenix Kapitaldienst GmbH
Phönix Aktiengesellschaft
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
27
Phönix Finanzsanierungs AG
Platinum Group International
Platonja GmbH
Plim Cooperation AG
PLUS CONCEPT GMBH
Plus Finanz Consulting GmbH
Postbank Finanzberatung AG
PPV Produkt-Promotion-Vertrieb
Pradofin
Premium Capital
Premium Firmenservice GmbH
Prime Core AG
Prime Gold Invest AG
Prime Select AG
Primus Consulting Optionshandel GmbH
Prinz zu Hohenlohe Jagstberg & Banghard GmbH
Private Commercial Office (PCO)
Private Equity Capital Group
Private Equity Invest AG
Private Fiduciary Trust GmbH
Private Investment Brokers and Financial Fonds Inc.
PRIZMA F.A. CENTER
Profi Moderne Wohnungsbaugenossenschaft
Profit.sawas.info
Projekta GmbH
Projostar GmbH
Prokon Kapital GmbH
Protectas Vermögensberatung GmbH
Protected International Inc.
PS-Leasing
Piroth
Petry
 Quinz
QES – Die Geldarchitekten
Quantum Asset Management
Quatro Group
QUEEN GMBH
Quinz Jürgen
Quorum AG
 Riesen van
Reegen
Riviera
Rose
Reinke
Ruppert
Rautenberg
Rüdenauer
Rist
Röll
Rohde
Runyeon
Rieß de Sanchez
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
28
Rachensperger
Ramin
Rohde
Range
Reich
Rummelt
Runyeon
Reimers
Rohbeck
R&S GmbH
R.A.P. Vermögensanlagen-Aktiengesellschaft & Co. KG Immobilienverwaltung
Racingkasino.Com
Rainbow Real Estate Ltd.
Ralph Hübner Verlag
Ranston Ltd
Ranston Ltd.
Ravena Finanz Management AG
RDV GmbH
Real Estate AG
Rechtsanwalt Asmus
Register of Commerce – Markenregisterverzeichnis
Renko & Associates
Renta / Löwer
Rentmeister KG
Res Justitia GmbH
Residencia GmbH
Rheinisch Westfälische Grundbesitz AG
Richmond & Palmer Investments Inc
Riverblue GmbH
RK-invest intern. Ltd.
RKI Invest
RKV Finanzservice
Robyns Capital GmbH
Robyns Vermögensverwaltung GmbH
Rodman & Shaw Ltd.
Rontax-Treuhand
Rosiak Dr.
Ruhrstrom GmbH
Ruluso Holding Ltd.
Rushton Limited
Ruspa Capital AG
Ruyan Europe
Richter
Reime
Richtsteig
Rademann
Rippel
 Sälinger
Schwarz
Stefan
Storm
Seuchter
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
29
Seumenicht
Schaefer
Scholl
Siegert
Schuhmann
Scharl
STRÖMBERG
Stanley
Splisteser
Sablowski
Schwarz
Stumpf
Scholz
Steigenberger
Schmidt
Seebacher
Sümper
Steuten
Schwartz
Simon
Schrämli
Spilker
Spanier
Seci
Stolte
Stolte
Schmid
Schmid
Schroeder
Seidel
Schmidtlein
Stangl
Steinbach
Stecker
Szulc
Schäfer
Spilker
Scholl
Stadelmaier
Shadi
Schäfer
Schmidt
Schaul
Sulser -Eggenberger
Schwarz
Sch.
S.
Schroeder Dr.
Schierloh
Sinn
Soldwisch
Smith
Schmidt
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
30
Schrenk
Schieweck
Schmidt
S.
Schmid
S&K Deutsche Sachwert AG
S.B.E. Bank
S.B.E. Financial SA
S.L.I.C.E AG
Sachsen Planke GmbH
Sachsenpark AG
Safe Inrest Quota Obtain Ltd (auch bekannt unter SIQO)
Sagro
Sakura Financial Group
SAM FINANZ AG – Swiss Asset Management
San West Inc.
Sauer & Söhne
Saxonia Sparkasse Inc.
SBAG – Schweizerische Börsenabwicklungsgesellschaft mbH
Schmid Immobilien Ltd.
Schmiedendorf Arzneimittelvertrieb AG
Schuhbecks am Platzl GmbH
Schutzvereinigung der Versicherten, Sparer und Kapitalanleger e. V.
Schwabenland Büro
Schweizer Kapital AG
SCT Bank Ltd.
SD Global Equity AG & Co. KG
Seabed Invest AG
SEB Bank AG
Sebeka GmbH
Secured Communications Limited
Securenta AG
Securities Regulatory and Investment Board (SRIB)
Senior Invest
Servicebüro Natter
SFP Private Banking
SFR AG (Swiss Finance Research AG)
Sherwood Henderson Limited
Shibby & Partners
Sigma Leasing Ltd.
Sigma Trading Limited
Signature Equities Agency GmbH
Signum Edelsteine GmbH
Sisko System Haus AG
Skyline Advisory Group
Solatera Energy AG
Sole Invest GmbH
Solventa Finanzservice GmbH
Sophisticated Investor Inc.
SP Trade Investment Capital Ltd. / SP Trader Fund
Sparkasse Dortmund
Spree Finanz AG
Spree-Capital GmbH
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
31
Star Invest
Stebo GmbH
Steinberg Investment Research AG
Steinberg Investments Ltd.
Stephens Capital Markets Limited
Sterling Asset Management AG
STIFX (stifxonline.com)
Stifxonline.com
Stonehard Consulting d.o.o.
Stratton & Partner
Stratton Wainwright
Suisse Banking
Suisse Life Securities
Sunset Handelsgesellschaft Unternehmergesellschaft
SVK Marketing GmbH
SVM24Direkt
SWAG – Schweizerische Wertpapierabrechnungsgesellschaft AG
SWD Sächsischer Wirtschaftsdienst
Swiss Agricole Asset Management
Swiss Basis GmbH
Swiss Bellair Bank
Swiss Credit Trust AG
SWISS DIVISION
Swiss Finance Conceptions & Marketing AG
SWISS Finance Consult
Swiss Finance Consult AG
Swiss Finance Consult AG
Swiss Finance Research AG
Swiss Key Equity Consult AG
Swiss Lotto – Gesellschaft Schweizer Zahlenlotto
Swiss Lotto Agency
Swiss Lotto Highstakes
Swiss Marketing GmbH
Swiss Siam Investment Club
Swiss Trading
Swiss World Cyber Lottery International – Swiss Lottery
Swiss-American Capital Management Institute,Inc.
SwissAudit Aktiengesellschaft
SwissKap AG
Swisskontor GmbH
Swissridge International Corp.
Switzerland Investment Group
Süddeutsche Stabak AG
Süddeutsche Stabak Aktiengesellschaft AG
Südwestbank AG
System Vorsorge Kapitalvermittlung (SVK)
Schmuck
Simon
Schlag
Sonntag
Schellscheidt
Schildbach
Schmidt
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
32
Surowiec
 Tzolov
Tannenbaum
Thomson
Tucholke
Traxel
Teller
Trisl
TOBER
Tausch
Trice
Thimm
Turgut
Tank
T.K. Immobilien GmbH
Taipan
Talis Enterprise GmbH
Task Force Service GmbH
Taurus GmbH
TBC-Marketing AG
Telba GmbH
Tele Inside s.r.o.
Tellba GMBH
The Crown Group CH
The Vale Group / Vale Group InvestmentsVale Group Asset Management /
Thomas Moore
Titan
Titan Trading Group
TiViBo GmbH
Tortola Capital
Trade Direct GmbH
Transatlantic Business & Management Ltd.
TRC Telemedia e.K.
Treberhilfe Berlin gGmbH
Treff Hotel Beteiligung
Trend Capital AG
Treu-Control Wirtschaftsberatungs- und Treuhandgesellschaft mbH
Treulux AG
Tri-Hub International
Triagon Holding AG
Trias Erste KG
Trias Zweite KG
Trikom Consulting GmbH
Trinity Ventures
TSI Consulting
TSI-Consulting
Turner Mayfield Advisory A.G.
TVI Express
Two For 1 Sportsbook
TXL Business Academy GmbH
TXL Capital Management GmbH
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
33
Tang
Täubert
 Ullmann
Uhlendorff
UBS Deutschland AG
UFB VERMITTLUNGSGESELLSCHAFT MBH
UFP
UGV Inkasso
Ulrich Engler Daytrading
Ulrich Petry
ULRICH VERLAG KG
ULRICH- VERLAG KG
Unabhängige Wirtschaftskanzlei Wolfgang Gelbke
Unia Holding AG
Unia Industrie Holding AG
Unispar Banque PLC
United Invest Management Deutschland Ltd & Co. KG
United Investors
United Markets (Asia) Limited
United Network Industries (Uni AG)
United Re-Insurance Group
United Trust Bank Plc.
United Trust of Switzerland S.A
United Trust of Switzerland S.A.
Unitymedia Hessen GmbH & Co KG
Universal Settlements International (USI) Inc.
Univest Limited
Univesta
Univesta Björk Immobilien und Anlage GmbH & Co.
Unternehmensgruppe Esdinero
UOT Financial Services Limited
US GOLD INTERNATIONAL LTD.
US Securities Agency (USSA)
Usecom Software AG
 Volkmann
Völl
Vitor
Voß
van Dien
van Dyken
Voll
von Eugen
Varin
Varin
Vejpustek
Volk
Vogel
von Krauthahn
V-O-B Handelsgesellschaft mbH
V/F Operation Leasing GmbH
VABA AG
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
34
ValueMaker
VALUTA VERMÖGENSVERWALTUNG GMBH
VanFunds / Vandior Inc.
Vanilla
VCI
Ventana Biotech Inc.
Ventono Capital GmbH
Venture Associates
Verbraucherdienst.e.V
Verimount FZE
Versicherungsdienst
Vertex Commodities
Verum Placement Ltd.
Vierte Juragent GmbH & Co. Prozesskostenfonds KG
VIT EnvironmentSystems AG
Vitascanning AG
Viva Tenerife Services
Volkssolidarität Sozial-Immobilien GmbH
Volkssolidarität Sozialimmobilienfonds GmbH & Co. KG
 Wood
Wächter
Wintzler
Willer
Wiedenbauer
Walkemeyer
Weimer
Walkemeyer
Wolter
Wolter
Wagner
W.
Wagner
Wolfram
Wolfram
Werner Dr.
Wagner
Wulff
Wagner
Weislogel
Walker
Wagner
WABAG – Wirtschaftsanalyse und Beratung AG
Wagner Finanzvermittlung GmbH
Wahl + Partner GmbH
Warrick Management Group Ltd.
Waterman Associates
WBwso Ltd
Wconstrukt
Wealth and Asset Planning
Webtains GmbH
Weizman Associates
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
35
Weizman Associates LLC
Wellshire Securities GmbH
West Atlantic Credit Group
WESTGATE Financial AG
Westminster Financial Management Ltd
Weyhill Establishments
WFB sro
White Birds Germany GmbH
Whitherspoon, Seymour & Robinson Corp.
Who is Who Prominentenenzyklopädie AG
WIBAG Immobilien und Beteiligung Aktiengesellschaft
Wicon Wirtschafts- und Finanzkontor Betz & Kronacher Beteiligungsgesellschaft
WIETEC-Germany
WIG – Wirtschaftszentrale für Industrie und Gewerbe AG
WIHH – Wirtschaftsinstitut für Industrie, Handel, Handwerk AG
WILL GMBH FINANZBERATUNG & VERWALTUNG
William Smith Partners
Wilton Investment Group
WiRe AG
Wirtschafts- und Finanzberatung Lindow-Giebel
Wirtschaftskanzlei Jilg GmbH
Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft Contor GmbH
WNB Finanzanlagen AG
Wohnbaufinanz
Wohnungsbaugesellschaft Leipzig West AG
Wohnungsbaugesellschaft Leipzig-West AG
Wonsei AG
Woodbridge Business Corp.
World Capital Group
World Capital Holding Corporation
WORLD MEDIA FONDS
World Telecom Data
WorldClearing Holding Inc.
Worldexchange
WorldFX-club
WSR – Whitherspoon, Seymour & Robinson Corporation
Würzburger Aktiengesellschaft für Vermögensbeteiligungen und Verwaltung (WAG)
 X Com Ltd.
Ximex Executive Ltd
XYZ NOMINEES LTD
 Y2M Media Limited
YESILADA BANK LTD.
Young Media Spain S.L.
Yuca Park
 Ziedd
Zeitler
Zürbis
Zimmermann
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
Zimmermann
Zürbis
Zietlow
Zürbis
Zollweg
Zürbis
Zensen-Döring
Z.E.N.I.T. AG
ZAK Inkasso
Zapf Creation
ZBI Zentral Boden Immobilien AG
ZDR-Datenregister GmbH
ZeBo GmbH
ZECH & ZECH VERMÖGENSVERWALTUNG GMBH
Zeder Immobilien Treuhand AG
ZEDER INVESTMENT AG
Zenith Commodities Ltd
ZENKER WOHNBAU AG
Zentrum für Wirtschaftspraxis
Zinnwald Financiers
Zucomex The Zurich Commodities Exchange
Zurich Capital Gruppe
Zurich Direct

Opfer in 2011:

– Angela Merkel

– Wolfgang Schäuble

– Accessio AG

– Allianz Global Investors

– Antek International

– Andreas Decker

– Anna Schwertner

– Bank of America

– Barclays

– Bernd Müller

– Bernd Pulch

– Beluga

– Bliznet Group Inc.

– Centrum Immobilien

– Citigroup

– Coldwell Banker

– Commerzbank

– CPA Capital Partners

– Credit Suisse

– CSA

– CWI

– Debiselect

– D.E.U.S.eG – Jürgen Oswald

– Deutsche Bank

– Deutsche Anstalt für Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht

– DKB Bank

– Dr. Paul Jensen

– Ekrem Redzepagic

– Erste Mai GmbH

– Express Kurier Europa

– Financial Services Regulatory Authority of Frankfurt

– FRONTAL 21

– Garbe

– General Global Media

– Genfer Kreditanstalt

– HCI

– HSBC

– HypoLeasing

– Indara

– JPMorgan Chase

– Kreis Sparkasse Tübingen

– Leipziger Bauträger (etliche Firmen, hier subsummiert)

– Lloyds Bank

– Lothar Berresheim

– Martina Oeder

– Martin Sachs

– Meridian Capital

– Money Pay

– Norinchukin Bank

– Oak Tree

– Prime Estate

– Prosperia Mephisto 1 GmbH & Co KG

– Raiffeisen- und Volksbanken

– Rothmann & Cie.

– Stefan Schramm

– Teldafax

– TipTalk.com

– Wirecard

Natürlich alles OHNE IRGENDEINEN BEWEIS VON VORBESTRAFTEN SERIENBETRÜGERN AUF EINER HOMEPAGE MIT KEINER ECHTEN PERSON IM IMPRESSUM STATTDESSEN MIT EINER NEW YORKER BRIEFKASTENADRESSE IM AUFTRAG MUTMASSLICH VON RA JOCHEN RESCH UND RA MANFRED RESCH, PETER EHLERS UND GERD BENNEWIRTZ -UND UNTER MITARBEIT VON GOOGLE, DEUTSCHLAND,

ALS “FRONTMANN” VON “GOMOPA” AGIERT DER DUTZENDWEISE VORBESTRAFTE KLAUS MAURISCHAT UNTER ANDEREM WEGEN BETRUGES AN SEINEM EIGENEN ANLEGER

Das Urteil gegen„GoMoPa“-Maurischat: Betrug am eigenen Anleger wg € 10.000,-

110401 6 Neues Opfer der RA Resch GoMoPa   STASI Kriminellen: Vorbestrafte GoMoPa Anlegerbetrüger   krankhaft kriminell h
Die Verurteilung von Klaus Maurischat und Mark Vornkahl wegen Betruges am eigenen Anleger Klaus Maurischat und Mark Vornkahl, Betreiber vonwww.gomopa.net: Am 24. April 2006 war die Verhandlung am Amtsgericht Krefeld in der Betrugssache: Mark Vornkahl / Klaus Maurischat ./. Dehnfeld. Aktenzeichen: 28 Ls 85/05 Klaus MaurischatLange Straße 3827313 Dörverden.Das in diesem Verfahren ausschließlich diese Betrugsache verhandelt wurde, ist das Urteil gegen Klaus Maurischat recht mäßig ausgefallen.Zusammenfassung der Verhandlung vom 24.04.2006 vor dem Schöffengericht des AG Krefeld in der Sache gegen Klaus Maurischat und Mark Vornkahl.Zur Hauptverhandlung erschienen:Richter Dr. Meister, 2 Schöffen,Staatsanwalt, Angeklagter Klaus Maurischat, vertr. durch RA Meier, Berlin; aus der U-Haft zur Verhandlung überführt.1. Eine Gerichtsvollzieherin stellt unter Ausschuss der Öffentlichkeit eine Urkunde an den Angeklagten Maurischat zu.2. Bei Mark Vornkahl wurde im Gerichtssaal eineTaschenpfändung vorgenommen.Beginn der HauptverhandlungDie Beklagten verzichten auf eine Einlassung zu Beginn.Nach Befragung des Zeugen Denfeld zum Sachverhalt wurde dieVerhandlung auf Wunsch der Staatsanwaltschaft und den Verteidigern unterbrochen.Der Angeklagte Maurischat gab nach Fortsetzung derHauptverhandlung Folgendes zu Protokoll:Er sähe ein, dass das Geld auf das falsche Konto gegangen sei und nicht dem eigentlichen Verwendungszweck zugeführt wurde. Das Geld sei aber zurückgezahlt worden und er distanziere sich ausdrücklich von einem Betrug.Schließung der BeweisaufnahmeDer Staatsanwalt verließt sein PlädoyerEr halte am Vorwurf des Betruges fest. Mit Hinweis auf die einschlägigen Vorstrafen des Angekl. Maurischatund auf laufende Ermittlungsverfahren, beantrage er ein Strafmaß von 1 Jahr und 6 Monaten.Er halte dem Angeklagten zu Gute, dass dieserWiedergutmachung geleistet habe, und dass dieser geständig war. Zudem läge die letzte Verurteilung wegen Betruges 11 Jahre zurück. Auch sei der Geschädigte nicht in existentielle Not geraten, wobei der Staatsanwalt nicht über noch laufende Verfahren hinweg sehen könne. Er läge aber dem Angeklagten Maurischat nahe, keine weiteren Aktivitäten im Bezirk der Staatsanwaltschaft Krefeld auszuüben, insbesondere möchte er, dass keine weiteren Anleger im Bezirk der Staatsanwaltschaft Krefeld durch GoMoPa akquiriert werden.Die Freiheitsstrafe soll zur Bewährung ausgesetzt werden.Plädoyer des Verteidigers des Angekl. Maurischat, Herrn RA MeierEr schließe sich, wie (in der Unterbrechung) vereinbart, dem Staatsanwalt an.Es stimme, dass sein Mandant Fehler in seiner Vergangenheit gemacht habe, und dass er auch diesmal einen Fehler begangen haben könnte, jedoch sei der Hinweis wichtig, dass sein Mandant aus diesen Fehlern gelernt habe.Der Angeklagte haben das letzte Wort.Maurischat sagt, es sei bereits alles gesagt worden.Unterbrechung zu Hauptverhandlung. Der Richter zieht sich mit den Schöffen zur Beratung zurück.Urteilsverkündung:Der Angeklagte wird des gemeinschaftlichen Betrugs für schuldig befunden.Der Angeklagte Klaus Maurischat wird zu einerFreiheitsstrafe von 1 Jahr und 6 Monaten verurteilt. Diese wird zur Bewährung ausgesetzt.Die Bewährungszeit wird auf 3 Jahre festgesetzt.Der Haftbefehl gegen Klaus Maurischat wird aufgehoben.Der Angeklagte trage die Kosten des Verfahrens.UrteilsbegründungDer Richter erklärt, dass eine Täuschung des Geschädigtenvorliegt und somit keine Untreue in Betracht kommen kann.Die Fragen, ob es sich um einen Anlagebetrug handele sei irrelevant. Er hält den Angeklagten die geleistete Wiedergutmachung zu Gute.Ebenso ist das Geständnis für die Angeklagten zu werten. Zudem liegt die letzte Verurteilung des Angeklagten Maurischat 11 Jahre zurück.Die Parteien verzichten auf Rechtsmittel. Das Urteil ist somit rechtskräftig.Mit dem heutigen Urteil endet ein Kapitel in derBetrugssache Goldman Morgenstern & Partners, Klaus Maurischat und Mark Vornkahl.Alle GoMoPa.net Verantwortlichen, Maurischat, Vornkahl und Henneberg sind nun vorbestrafte Abzocker und Betrüger und die Zukunft der Pseudoklitsche GoMoPa.net sieht duster aus.Mir dem Geständnis der beiden ABZOCKER MAURISCHAT UND VORNKAHL vor Gericht bricht ein jahrelangaufrechterhaltenes Lügengeflecht von einigen primitiven Betrügern zusammen. Gewohnheitsverbrecher und Denunzianten,die rechtschaffene Personen und Firmen in ihren Verbrecherforen kriminalisierten.

“SPIEGEL” über die STASI-Connection des mutmasslichen “GoMoPa”-Chefs Jochen Resch

http://www.spiegel.de/spiegel/print/d-65717414.html

DIE FRANKFURTER ALLGEMEINE ZEITUNG ÜBER DIE FINGIERTE “GoMoPa”

http://www.faz.net/s/Rub77CAECAE94D7431F9EACD163751D4CFD/Doc~E70F3E028C8E542D9B0AD6B2A8B1179C3~ATpl~Ecommon~Scontent.html

http://www.faz.net/s/RubEC1ACFE1EE274C81BCD3621EF555C83C/Doc~EB5651ECDC72949FF907D2CA89D5AFE72~ATpl~Ecommon~Scontent.html

GOOGLE SKANDAL: UNGLAUBLICHES VERSAGEN BEI GOOGLE – ODER MITTÄTERSCHAFT ?

Sehr geehrter Herr Greenbaum,

Ihre Email an Herrn Dr. Haller vom 11.05.2011 ist bei der Google Germany
GmbH eingegangen. Ebenso hat uns Frau Wagner über Ihren heutigen Anruf in
Kenntnis gesetzt.

Wie Ihnen bereits bekannt sein dürfte, ist die Google Germany GmbH weder
rechtlich noch technisch in der Lage, Zugriff auf die Suchergebnisse unter
www.google.de zu nehmen. Bitte wenden Sie sich daher in Zukunft direkt an
die Google Inc., Betreiberin der Seite www.google.de und der Suchmaschine
Google, wie sich dem Impressum unter
http://www.google.com/intl/de/impressum.html entnehmen lässt.

Im Namen der Google Inc. dürfen wir Ihnen nun ein letztes Mal bestätigen,
dass folgende Links bereits aus dem Google-Index entfernt worden sind:

http://www.gomopa.net/Pressemitteilun
http://www.gomopa.net/Pre
http://pressreleaser.org/ber
http://www.gomopa.net/Fina
https://scheisshausfliege.wordp
http://www.gomopa.net/Pressem
https://scheisshausfliege.wordpress.com/
http://www.bernd-pulc
http://www.bernd-pulc
http://www.bernd-pulch
http://www.gomopa.net/Press
http://www.stalker-bern
http://www.stalker-be
http://www.stalk
http://www.sta

Bitte beachten Sie, dass eine Entfernung aus dem Suchindex nicht zu einer
Entfernung der Rechtsverletzung führen kann. Die Funktion einer Suchmaschine
ist es, Internetinhalte auffindbar zu machen, sie verbreitet diese jedoch
nicht selbst. Die Suchfunktionalität ist gewissermaßen das
"Spiegelbild" des Internets.

Sollten Sie weitere Suchergebnisse beanstanden, so müssten wir Sie bitten,
der Google Inc. die konkreten Links, die zu den von Ihnen beanstandeten
Webseiten führen, per Email zukommen zu lassen. Darüber hinaus müssten wir
Sie bitten, substantiiert darzulegen, welche konkreten Aussagen Sie
beanstanden, wo genau sich die angebliche Rechtsverletzung in Bezug auf die
Links befindet und woraus sich diese begründet.

Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
Rechtsabteilung Support

--
Google Germany GmbH
ABC - Strasse 19
20354 Hamburg

AG Hamburg, HRB 86891

Sitz der Gesellschaft: Hamburg
Geschäftsführer: John Herlihy, Graham Law, Lloyd Martin, Kent Walker

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Diese E-Mail ist vertraulich. Wenn Sie nicht der richtige Adressat sind,
leiten Sie diese bitte nicht weiter, informieren den Absender und löschen
Sie die E-Mail und alle Anhänge. Vielen Dank.

 This email is confidential. If you are not the right addressee please do
not forward it, please inform the sender, and please erase this e-mail
including any attachments. Thanks.

GOOGLE SKANDAL: UNGLAUBLICHES VERSAGEN BEI GOOGLE – ODER MITTÄTERSCHAFT ?

Sehr geehrter Herr Greenbaum,

Ihre Email an Herrn Dr. Haller vom 11.05.2011 ist bei der Google Germany
GmbH eingegangen. Ebenso hat uns Frau Wagner über Ihren heutigen Anruf in
Kenntnis gesetzt.

Wie Ihnen bereits bekannt sein dürfte, ist die Google Germany GmbH weder
rechtlich noch technisch in der Lage, Zugriff auf die Suchergebnisse unter
www.google.de zu nehmen. Bitte wenden Sie sich daher in Zukunft direkt an
die Google Inc., Betreiberin der Seite www.google.de und der Suchmaschine
Google, wie sich dem Impressum unter
http://www.google.com/intl/de/impressum.html entnehmen lässt.

Im Namen der Google Inc. dürfen wir Ihnen nun ein letztes Mal bestätigen,
dass folgende Links bereits aus dem Google-Index entfernt worden sind:

http://www.gomopa.net/Pressemitteilun
http://www.gomopa.net/Pre
http://pressreleaser.org/ber
http://www.gomopa.net/Fina
https://scheisshausfliege.wordp
http://www.gomopa.net/Pressem
https://scheisshausfliege.wordpress.com/
http://www.bernd-pulc
http://www.bernd-pulc
http://www.bernd-pulch
http://www.gomopa.net/Press
http://www.stalker-bern
http://www.stalker-be
http://www.stalk
http://www.sta

Bitte beachten Sie, dass eine Entfernung aus dem Suchindex nicht zu einer
Entfernung der Rechtsverletzung führen kann. Die Funktion einer Suchmaschine
ist es, Internetinhalte auffindbar zu machen, sie verbreitet diese jedoch
nicht selbst. Die Suchfunktionalität ist gewissermaßen das
"Spiegelbild" des Internets.

Sollten Sie weitere Suchergebnisse beanstanden, so müssten wir Sie bitten,
der Google Inc. die konkreten Links, die zu den von Ihnen beanstandeten
Webseiten führen, per Email zukommen zu lassen. Darüber hinaus müssten wir
Sie bitten, substantiiert darzulegen, welche konkreten Aussagen Sie
beanstanden, wo genau sich die angebliche Rechtsverletzung in Bezug auf die
Links befindet und woraus sich diese begründet.

Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
Rechtsabteilung Support

--
Google Germany GmbH
ABC - Strasse 19
20354 Hamburg

AG Hamburg, HRB 86891

Sitz der Gesellschaft: Hamburg
Geschäftsführer: John Herlihy, Graham Law, Lloyd Martin, Kent Walker

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Diese E-Mail ist vertraulich. Wenn Sie nicht der richtige Adressat sind,
leiten Sie diese bitte nicht weiter, informieren den Absender und löschen
Sie die E-Mail und alle Anhänge. Vielen Dank.

 This email is confidential. If you are not the right addressee please do
not forward it, please inform the sender, and please erase this e-mail
including any attachments. Thanks.

GOOGLE SKANDAL: UNGLAUBLICHES VERSAGEN BEI GOOGLE – ODER MITTÄTERSCHAFT ?

Sehr geehrter Herr Greenbaum,

Ihre Email an Herrn Dr. Haller vom 11.05.2011 ist bei der Google Germany
GmbH eingegangen. Ebenso hat uns Frau Wagner über Ihren heutigen Anruf in
Kenntnis gesetzt.

Wie Ihnen bereits bekannt sein dürfte, ist die Google Germany GmbH weder
rechtlich noch technisch in der Lage, Zugriff auf die Suchergebnisse unter
www.google.de zu nehmen. Bitte wenden Sie sich daher in Zukunft direkt an
die Google Inc., Betreiberin der Seite www.google.de und der Suchmaschine
Google, wie sich dem Impressum unter
http://www.google.com/intl/de/impressum.html entnehmen lässt.

Im Namen der Google Inc. dürfen wir Ihnen nun ein letztes Mal bestätigen,
dass folgende Links bereits aus dem Google-Index entfernt worden sind:

http://www.gomopa.net/Pressemitteilun
http://www.gomopa.net/Pre
http://pressreleaser.org/ber
http://www.gomopa.net/Fina
https://scheisshausfliege.wordp
http://www.gomopa.net/Pressem
https://scheisshausfliege.wordpress.com/
http://www.bernd-pulc
http://www.bernd-pulc
http://www.bernd-pulch
http://www.gomopa.net/Press
http://www.stalker-bern
http://www.stalker-be
http://www.stalk
http://www.sta

Bitte beachten Sie, dass eine Entfernung aus dem Suchindex nicht zu einer
Entfernung der Rechtsverletzung führen kann. Die Funktion einer Suchmaschine
ist es, Internetinhalte auffindbar zu machen, sie verbreitet diese jedoch
nicht selbst. Die Suchfunktionalität ist gewissermaßen das
"Spiegelbild" des Internets.

Sollten Sie weitere Suchergebnisse beanstanden, so müssten wir Sie bitten,
der Google Inc. die konkreten Links, die zu den von Ihnen beanstandeten
Webseiten führen, per Email zukommen zu lassen. Darüber hinaus müssten wir
Sie bitten, substantiiert darzulegen, welche konkreten Aussagen Sie
beanstanden, wo genau sich die angebliche Rechtsverletzung in Bezug auf die
Links befindet und woraus sich diese begründet.

Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
Rechtsabteilung Support

--
Google Germany GmbH
ABC - Strasse 19
20354 Hamburg

AG Hamburg, HRB 86891

Sitz der Gesellschaft: Hamburg
Geschäftsführer: John Herlihy, Graham Law, Lloyd Martin, Kent Walker

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Diese E-Mail ist vertraulich. Wenn Sie nicht der richtige Adressat sind,
leiten Sie diese bitte nicht weiter, informieren den Absender und löschen
Sie die E-Mail und alle Anhänge. Vielen Dank.

 This email is confidential. If you are not the right addressee please do
not forward it, please inform the sender, and please erase this e-mail
including any attachments. Thanks.

ICH KLAGE “PETER EHLERS” DES RUFMORDES UND VERSUCHTEN MORDES AN MIR UND MEINER FAMILIE UND MEINEN FREUNDEN AN

ICH KLAGE “PETER EHLERS” DES RUFORDES UND VERSUCHTEN MORDES AN MIR UND MEINER FAMILIE AN

DIE DETAILS IN KÜRZE

ERST DER RUFMORD – DANN DER REALE MORD – SO GEHT “GoMoPa” vor

Nachdem ich den “GoMoPa”-Drahtziehern auf die Schliche gekommen will, wollen diese Kriminellen mich ausschalten.

An dieser Stelle sage ich: So haben sie es auch mit Heinz Gerlach (mit dem ich immer in Fehde lag) getan.

Das wird Ihnen diesmal nicht gelingen !

HERZLICHST

MAGISTER BERND PULCH

Mutmasslich: “Peter Ehlers” von “Das Investment”.com = “GoMoPa” = “Scheisshausblog”

Liebe Leser,

die Indizien mehren sich:

Mutmasslich: “Peter Ehlers” von “Das Investment”.com = “GoMoPa” = “Scheisshausblog”

mutmasslich entweder als Anstifter, als Partner oder in eigener Regie.

Was kann man auch von jemanden erwarten, der Bundeskanzlerin Angela Merkel und Bundesfinanzminister Wolfgang Schäuble als kriminelle Hehler bezeichnet – wie “Peter Ehlers” und/oder “GoMoPa” ?

“GoMoPa” und Ihr mutmasslicher Auftraggeber/Partner Peter Ehlers: Bundeskanzlerin Merkel und Bundesfinanzminister Schäuble sind “Deutschlands bekannteste Hehler”

Ehlers-GoMoPa-Rufmorde: Sind Bundeskanzlerin Merkel und Minister Schäuble „Deutschlands bekannteste Hehler“ und Wirecard ein „Betrugsfall“ ?

Ehlers-GoMoPa-Rufmorde: Sind Bundeskanzlerin Merkel und Minister Schäuble „Deutschlands bekannteste Hehler“ und Wirecard ein „Betrugsfall“ ?(DAS INVESTMENT MAGAZIN – DAS ORIGINAL – IMMOBILIEN VERTRAULICH) DAS ORIGINAL – „Sicher nein“, werden Sie jetzt sagen und fragen: „Wer behauptet diesen staatszersetzenden Schwachsinn ?“

„Fonds & Friends-Herausgeber“ Peter Ehlers (wenn der Name stimmt ?) und der Ost-Berliner NACHRICHTENDIENST”  “GoMoPa” bezeichneten die deutsche Bundeskanzlerin Angela Merkel und den deutschen Bundesfinanzminister Wolfgang Schäuble als “kriminelle Hehler” und als Deutschlands „bekannteste Hehler“.
Original-Zitat Peter Ehlers (wenn denn wengistens der Name stimmt ?) :
„Wolfgang Schäuble, Finanzminister unter Kanzlerin Angela Merkel. Beide sind sich nicht immer einig. Jetzt schon: Sie wollen als Staat, von deutschen Steuergeldern bezahlt, ein neues staatliches Geschäft eröffnen: Hehlerei.
Peter Ehlers,
Herausgeber DAS INVESTMENT
Ein Kommentar von Peter Ehlers, Herausgeber DAS INVESTMENT
Ein durchaus einträgliches Geschäft, das nur einen Haken hat: Es ist illegal. Schäuble hat dafür eine lustige Rechtsauffassung: Er sieht den Deal, den der damalige Finanzminister Peer Steinbrück („das beste Geschäft meines Lebens“) machte, für sich als Rechtfertigung. Frei nach dem billigen Motto: Wenn mein Vorgänger kriminell war, darf ich das ja wohl auch sein.“
Das heisst nicht nur Schäuble handelt illegal und kriminell – im ganz grossen Stil, sondern auch die Vorgänger Ex-Bundes-Finanzminister Peer Steinbrück und Ex-Bundeskanzler gerhard Schröder…
Und mich bezeichnet Peter Ehlers (wenn denn wengistens der Name stimmt ?) als “Internet-Terroristen”, „Erpresser“, „Gewohnheitsverbrecher“ und „Idioten“, ach ja meinen akademischen Titel Magister Artium täusche ich auch vor, sagen Peter Ehlers und GoMoPa, unisono..

Dies ist bezeichnet für die psychotische Wahnwelt dieser mutmasslich kommunistischen Delinquenten aus dem Osten Deutschlands.

Zum Tatbestand:

Im deutschen Strafrecht ist die Beamtenbeleidigung kein eigener Tatbestand. Ein Beamter ist hier nicht anders gestellt als ein anderer Bürger. Es handelt sich also um eine „normale“ Beleidigung gemäß § 185StGB.

Dennoch gibt es bei der Beleidigung eines Amtsträgers, der nicht zwingend Beamter sein muss, eine verfahrensrechtliche Besonderheit: Während die Straftat grundsätzlich nur auf Antrag des Verletzten verfolgt wird, kann gemäß § 194 Abs. 3 StGB bei Amtsträgern auch der Dienstvorgesetzte des Beleidigten den Strafantrag stellen:

„Ist die Beleidigung gegen einen Amtsträger, einen für den öffentlichen Dienst besonders Verpflichteten oder einen Soldaten der Bundeswehr während der Ausübung seines Dienstes oder in Beziehung auf seinen Dienst begangen, so wird sie auch auf Antrag des Dienstvorgesetzten verfolgt. Richtet sich die Tat gegen eine Behörde oder eine sonstige Stelle, die Aufgaben der öffentlichen Verwaltung wahrnimmt, so wird sie auf Antrag des Behördenleiters oder des Leiters der aufsichtführenden Behörde verfolgt. Dasselbe gilt für Träger von Ämtern und für Behörden der Kirchen und anderen Religionsgesellschaften des öffentlichen Rechts.“

Außerdem wird von der Staatsanwaltschaft in der Regel das öffentliche Interesse an der Strafverfolgung bejaht, so dass es weitaus seltener zur Verweisung auf den Privatklageweg oder zur Einstellung des Verfahrens nach § 153, 153a StPO kommt.

In der Praxis zieht die Beleidigung vor allem von (Polizei-)Beamten meist Geldstrafen nach sich. Bei mehrfach wegen solcher Delikte vorbestraften Personen sind in der Praxis schon kurze Freiheitsstrafen von z. B. 3 Monaten ohne Bewährung vorgekommen.

Fallbeispiel:

Beleidigung von Amtsträgern”Prozesse-Dieter” verurteilt
“Prozesse-Dieter”, prozessfreudiger Sozialhilfeempfänger aus Ratingen, ist zu einem Jahr Haft verurteilt worden. Das Amtsgericht in Ratingen bei Düsseldorf sprach den als “König der Kläger” bekannt gewordenen ehemaligen 73-jährigen Sportlehrer wegen 44 Beleidigungen von Amtsträgern wie Beamten, Richtern und Rechtspflegern schuldig.

Per Postkarten hatte sie der Senior mit Fäkalausdrücken überzogen. Das Gericht setzte sich über den psychiatrischen Gutachter hinweg, der den Angeklagten als schuldunfähig eingestuft hatte, weil dieser an einer paranoiden Persönlichkeitsstörung leide.

Dies trifft möglicherweise auch auf die Delinquenten Peter Ehlers/”GoMoPa” zu.
Zum Thema Wirecard und “GoMoPa” schreibt das “Handelsblatt:
Finanzaufsicht untersucht Kursachterbahn bei Wirecard
07.04.2010, 07:01 Uhr
exklusiv Die Bundesanstalt für Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht BaFin hat aufgrund der merkwürdigen Kursturbulenzen der Wirecard-Aktie eine förmliche Untersuchung des Falles eingeleitet. BaFin prüft mögliche Marktmanipulationen nach Falschbericht des Internetdienstes Gomopa. Zwei der Gomopa-Gründer wurden schon 2006 wegen Betrugs verurteilt.
von Sönke Iwersen

Der Kurs von Wirecard, einem Anbieter für elektronische Zahlungslöungen, ist am am vergangenen Dienstag nach Marktgerüchten heftig eingebrochen. Die BaFin prüft mögliche Manipulationen. Quelle: Pressebild
FRANKFURT. Die Bundesanstalt für Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht BaFin hat aufgrund der merkwürdigen Kursturbulenzen der Wirecard-Aktie eine förmliche Untersuchung des Falles eingeleitet. “Wir prüfen, ob es Anhaltspunkte für Marktmanipulation in Aktien der Wirecard AG gibt”, sagte eine BaFin-Sprecherin. Zu Details könne sie sich jedoch nicht äußern.
Der Kurs des Münchener Zahlungsabwicklers Wirecard war am vergangenen Dienstag um mehr als 30 Prozent eingebrochen. Am Abend zuvor hatte der Internetdienst Goldman, Morgenstern & Partners (Gomopa) berichtet, der in den USA wegen illegalen Online-Glücksspiels verhaftete Deutsche Michael Schütt habe in einem Geständnis Wirecard schwer belastet. Gomopa bezog sich auf einen Bericht der Lokalzeitung “Naples News”. Schütt habe ausgesagt, er sei bei illegalen Geldgeschäften direkt vom Wirecard-Vorstand beauftragt worden.
Das Problem an dem Gomopa-Bericht: Er war falsch. Wie Nachfragen des Handelsblattes ergaben, hat die Reporterin, die für die “Naples News” über Schütt schreibt, Wirecard nie erwähnt. Gomopa reagierte auf Nachfragen zögerlich. Erst löschte der Dienst den Hinweis auf die Lokalzeitung, hielt aber den Vorwurf aufrecht, Schütt habe Wirecard belastet. Danach änderte man den Bericht erneut. Nun hieß es, ein Informant von Gomopa verfüge über die fraglichen Details aus Schütts Geständnis.
Dem Handelsblatt liegt inzwischen das amtliche Protokoll von Schütts Geständnis am 23. März vor. Schütt bekennt sich darin schuldig, illegale Geldgeschäfte im Zusammenhang mit Online-Glücksspiel abgewickelt zu haben. Das Wort Wirecard kommt nicht vor. Gomopa hatte zu Wochenbeginn seinen Text erneut geändert und nun behauptet, Schütt belaste “eine Bank”. Auf erneute Nachfragen des Handelsblattes war der Bericht dann ganz verschwunden.
Der Kurs von Wirecard hat sich inzwischen fast vollständig erholt. Ein Frankfurter Analyst sagte, für ihn sei klar, dass die Aktie seit Wochen manipuliert werde. Erst verteure sich die Leihe der Aktie, dann komme es zu außergewöhnlichem Handel, danach tauchten plötzlich desaströse Gerüchte auf. Dazu gehöre auch die Anzeige, die vor kurzem bei der Staatsanwaltschaft München einging und Wirecard der Geldwäsche bezichtigt. Es sei offensichtlich, dass Short Seller mit der Wirecard-Aktie Jojo spielen.
Mark Vornkahl, einer der Gründer von Gomopa wies den Vorwurf der Kursmanipulation gestern zurück. Man wolle nur die Wahrheit aufdecken. Es ist allerdings nicht das erste Mal, dass Gomopa-Vertreter ins Zwielicht geraten. 2006 wurden Vornkahl und Mitgründer Klaus Maurischat wegen Betrugs an einem Anleger verurteilt. Maurischat gab gestern gegenüber dem Handelsblatt weitere Verurteilungen zu. Es habe sich dabei jedoch nicht um Anlagebetrug gehandelt.

http://www.handelsblatt.com/finanzen/boerse-maerkte/boerse-inside/finanzaufsicht-untersucht-kursachterbahn-bei-wirecard/3406252.html

UND SOLCHE TYPEN VERBREITEN WEITERE ENTEN AUS IRGENDEINEM SADDAM – ERDLOCH WÄHREND IN IHREM “VIRTUELLEN BÜRO” NUR EIN LEERER STUHL STEHT.
Ich bin der Erbe unseres Familienbuches und damit das Oberhaupt unserer Familie Pulch. Unsere Familie hat seit Jahrunderten in Deutschland, USA und vielen anderen Ländern, erfolgreiche Unternehmer, Staatssekretäre, Banker, Richter, Anwälte, Politiker und auch Journalisten hervorgebracht. Wir lassen unseren guten Namen nicht durch vorbestrafte Anlagebetrüger, Cybermörder und Stasi/NS-Kriminelle verunglimpfen. Deren Taten und Fäkalsprache sprechen für sich und bedürfen keiner ernsthaften Auseinandersetzung.
Die bezahlten Betrüger sollen die Kapitalanlage-Verbrecher schützen.
Darum geht es im Kern. Wie auch schon unter

http://www.victims-opfer.com

und

http://sjb-fonds-opfer.com/?page_id=11764

klar ersichtlich.
Hier ist der Original-Bericht von Meridian Capital

http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:8jmni-h2e_4J:www.maurischatinhaft.wordpress.com/+verhaftung+klaus+maurischat&cd=2&hl=de&ct=clnk&gl=de&source=www.google.de

Ich werde die kriminellen Verantwortlichen und ihre kriminellen Helfershelfer bis zur letzten Konsequenz zur Verantwortung ziehen.
Magister Bernd Pulch
PS Ich bedanke mich bei investment-on.com sowie allen anderen Medien für die Möglichkeit, die Dinge gerade zu rücken.

GOOGLE RECHTSBRUCH: Google bestätigt Rechtswidrigkeit der “GoMoPa”-Einträge – löscht sie aber bis lang nicht trotz Zusage

Google bestätigt Rechtswidrigkeit der “GoMoPa”-Einträge – löscht sie aber bis lang nicht trotz Zusage

Google-Skandal: Google bestätigt Rechtswidrigkeit der "GoMoPa"-Einträge - löscht sie aber bis lang nicht trotz Zusage und Strafanzeigen gegen Dr. Arndt Haller, Google, Deutschland nicht,
stecken "Google-IM" mit "GoMoPa" unter einer Decke ?

Sie Google-Mail:
  Re: [#717086735] Strafanzeigen gegen Dr. Arndt Haller [Fwd: FBI ermittelt nunmehr gegen Google Inc.: WEITERE STRAFANZEIGEN DRINGENDE ERINNERUNG: Re: AKTENZEICHEN DER KRIMINALPOLIZEI]]]]]]]]
Sehr geehrter Herr Greenbaum,(mein Anwalt)

vielen Dank für Ihre Geduld. Wir haben Ihre Beschwerde gemäß den in dem Land Ihres
Wohnsitzes geltenden Gesetzen verarbeitet. Die folgenden Webseiten wurden aus Google
(www.google.de) entfernt:

http://www.gomopa.net/Pressemitteilungen.hxxxxx
http://www.gomopa.net/Pressemitteilungen.xxxx
http://pressreleaser.org/bernd-pulch-erpresser-xxxxx
http://www.gomopa.net/Finanzforum/dubios/stalker-uxxxx
https://scheisshausfliege.wordpress.com/2011/02/08/vxxxxx
http://www.gomopa.net/Pressemitteilungen.htmlxxxxx
https://scheisshausfliege.wordpress.com/2011xxxxxx

Bitte lassen Sie es uns wissen, falls Sie noch weitere Fragen haben.

Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Ihr Google-Team

Google Inc.
Legal Support
1600 Amphitheatre Parkway
Mountain View, CA 94043
USA

VON RUFMÖRDERN u. Serienbetrügern erfundene “GoMoPa”: “Wer stoppt Google-Rufmorde?”

Hier beschreibt “GoMoPa” – was sie tun und wie sie es tun.

GoMoPa: Wer stoppt Google-Rufmorde?


Freie Bahn für Rufmord, Stalking und Existenzvernichtung im Internet. Suchmaschinen lassen sich von Kriminellen als Mittäter missbrauchen. Beispiel Google.

Jede Nachricht kann und darf gefaked sein, denn, so erklärt Oliver Klug von der Google-Presseagentur in Hamburg: “Für den Inhalt der Internetseiten ist Google nicht verantwortlich. Jeder Eingriff, außer bei schwerwiegenden Dingen wie Holocaust-Leugnungen, wäre eine unzulässige Zensur.” Das bedeutet im Klartext: Jeder kann mit Hilfe von Google jede nur erdenkliche Lüge über einen anderen Menschen oder über eine Firma verbreiten.

Klug verteidigt das Google-System: “Sie können doch bei der Polizei Anzeige erstatten und Verleumder verklagen. Mit einem Gerichtsurteil löschen wir selbstverständlich die Seiten.” GoMoPa meint: Das klingt gut, ist aber realitätsfern. Die meisten Verleumder arbeiten anonym und melden ihre Hetzseiten unter falschen Angaben an.

Das musste und muss GoMoPa am eigenen Leib erfahren. Der Finanznachrichtendienst wird seit anderthalb Jahren auf der Seite nepper-schlepper-bauernfaenger.com oder fuer-recht-und-ordnung.com mit Lügen von Hausdurchsuchungen, Festnahmen von Verantwortlichen oder angeblicher Strafanzeigen großer Banken überzogen. Natürlich wehrte sich GoMoPa mit juristischen Schritten. Doch der Verantwortliche der Nepper-Schlepper-Seite, die Rechtsanwaltskanzlei Atle Border mit Sitz in Bangkok (Thailand), ist frei erfunden. Der Server steht in Panama. Klug: “Ohne juristische Schritte können wir da nichts machen, das wäre Zensur.”

GoMoPa konfrontierte die Google-Presseagentur daraufhin mit einer konstruierten Verleumdung gegen Google. Inhalt: “Die Verantwortliche (Admin C) der Google Germany GmbH, Frau Lena Tangerxxxx aus Hamburg, führt nicht nur ein dubioses Doppelleben als Domina in der Herbertstraße auf der Reeperbahn. Lena Tangerxxxx steht kurz vor der Verhaftung. Gegen sie wird wegen Schleusung von russischen Minderjährigen nach Deutschland und Vermittlung an einen belgischen Kinderpornoring ermittelt.”

Die Seite könnte “www.google-schmutz.com” heißen. Anmelder wäre ein erfundener Dr. Alfred Motte aus Bangkok, der Server würde in Panama sitzen. Klug: Dagegen würde Google sofort mit rechtlichen Schritten vorgehen.” GoMoPa: Wie denn, wenn Sie den Absender gar nicht finden können? Darauf Klug: “Wir wüden prüfen, inwieweit anonyme Verleumdungen im Internet gegen unsere Nutzungsbestimmungen verstoßen.” Und aller Wahrscheinlichkeit nach sofort löschen?!!

Wird da mit zweierlei Maß gemessen? Google empfiehlt uns jedenfalls lapidar in einer Mitteilung zu unserem Löschantrag, eventuelle Streitigkeiten direkt mit dem Eigentümer der betreffenden Website beizulegen und teilt weiterhin mit, zum gegenwärtigen Zeitpunkt keine Maßnahmen zur Entfernung der verleumdenden Inhalte ergreifen zu wollen. Fortsetzung folgt.

Quelle: GoMoPa (www.gomopa.net / Siegfried Siewert)

Google-Skandal: Google bestätigt Rechtswidrigkeit der “GoMoPa”-Einträge – löscht sie aber bis lang nicht trotz Zusage

Google-Skandal: Google bestätigt Rechtswidrigkeit der "GoMoPa"-Einträge - löscht sie aber bis lang nicht trotz Zusage und Strafanzeigen gegen Dr. Arndt Haller, Google, Deutschland nicht,
stecken "Google-IM" mit "GoMoPa" unter einer Decke ?

Sie Google-Mail:
  Re: [#717086735] Strafanzeigen gegen Dr. Arndt Haller [Fwd: FBI ermittelt nunmehr gegen Google Inc.: WEITERE STRAFANZEIGEN DRINGENDE ERINNERUNG: Re: AKTENZEICHEN DER KRIMINALPOLIZEI]]]]]]]]
Sehr geehrter Herr Greenbaum,(mein Anwalt)

vielen Dank für Ihre Geduld. Wir haben Ihre Beschwerde gemäß den in dem Land Ihres
Wohnsitzes geltenden Gesetzen verarbeitet. Die folgenden Webseiten wurden aus Google
(www.google.de) entfernt:

http://www.gomopa.net/Pressemitteilungen.hxxxxx
http://www.gomopa.net/Pressemitteilungen.xxxx
http://pressreleaser.org/bernd-pulch-erpresser-xxxxx
http://www.gomopa.net/Finanzforum/dubios/stalker-uxxxx
https://scheisshausfliege.wordpress.com/2011/02/08/vxxxxx
http://www.gomopa.net/Pressemitteilungen.htmlxxxxx
https://scheisshausfliege.wordpress.com/2011xxxxxx

Bitte lassen Sie es uns wissen, falls Sie noch weitere Fragen haben.

Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Ihr Google-Team

Google Inc.
Legal Support
1600 Amphitheatre Parkway
Mountain View, CA 94043
USA

VON RUFMÖRDERN u. Serienbetrügern erfundene “GoMoPa”: “Wer stoppt Google-Rufmorde?”

Hier beschreibt “GoMoPa” – was sie tun und wie sie es tun.

GoMoPa: Wer stoppt Google-Rufmorde?


Freie Bahn für Rufmord, Stalking und Existenzvernichtung im Internet. Suchmaschinen lassen sich von Kriminellen als Mittäter missbrauchen. Beispiel Google.

Jede Nachricht kann und darf gefaked sein, denn, so erklärt Oliver Klug von der Google-Presseagentur in Hamburg: “Für den Inhalt der Internetseiten ist Google nicht verantwortlich. Jeder Eingriff, außer bei schwerwiegenden Dingen wie Holocaust-Leugnungen, wäre eine unzulässige Zensur.” Das bedeutet im Klartext: Jeder kann mit Hilfe von Google jede nur erdenkliche Lüge über einen anderen Menschen oder über eine Firma verbreiten.

Klug verteidigt das Google-System: “Sie können doch bei der Polizei Anzeige erstatten und Verleumder verklagen. Mit einem Gerichtsurteil löschen wir selbstverständlich die Seiten.” GoMoPa meint: Das klingt gut, ist aber realitätsfern. Die meisten Verleumder arbeiten anonym und melden ihre Hetzseiten unter falschen Angaben an.

Das musste und muss GoMoPa am eigenen Leib erfahren. Der Finanznachrichtendienst wird seit anderthalb Jahren auf der Seite nepper-schlepper-bauernfaenger.com oder fuer-recht-und-ordnung.com mit Lügen von Hausdurchsuchungen, Festnahmen von Verantwortlichen oder angeblicher Strafanzeigen großer Banken überzogen. Natürlich wehrte sich GoMoPa mit juristischen Schritten. Doch der Verantwortliche der Nepper-Schlepper-Seite, die Rechtsanwaltskanzlei Atle Border mit Sitz in Bangkok (Thailand), ist frei erfunden. Der Server steht in Panama. Klug: “Ohne juristische Schritte können wir da nichts machen, das wäre Zensur.”

GoMoPa konfrontierte die Google-Presseagentur daraufhin mit einer konstruierten Verleumdung gegen Google. Inhalt: “Die Verantwortliche (Admin C) der Google Germany GmbH, Frau Lena Tangerxxxx aus Hamburg, führt nicht nur ein dubioses Doppelleben als Domina in der Herbertstraße auf der Reeperbahn. Lena Tangerxxxx steht kurz vor der Verhaftung. Gegen sie wird wegen Schleusung von russischen Minderjährigen nach Deutschland und Vermittlung an einen belgischen Kinderpornoring ermittelt.”

Die Seite könnte “www.google-schmutz.com” heißen. Anmelder wäre ein erfundener Dr. Alfred Motte aus Bangkok, der Server würde in Panama sitzen. Klug: Dagegen würde Google sofort mit rechtlichen Schritten vorgehen.” GoMoPa: Wie denn, wenn Sie den Absender gar nicht finden können? Darauf Klug: “Wir wüden prüfen, inwieweit anonyme Verleumdungen im Internet gegen unsere Nutzungsbestimmungen verstoßen.” Und aller Wahrscheinlichkeit nach sofort löschen?!!

Wird da mit zweierlei Maß gemessen? Google empfiehlt uns jedenfalls lapidar in einer Mitteilung zu unserem Löschantrag, eventuelle Streitigkeiten direkt mit dem Eigentümer der betreffenden Website beizulegen und teilt weiterhin mit, zum gegenwärtigen Zeitpunkt keine Maßnahmen zur Entfernung der verleumdenden Inhalte ergreifen zu wollen. Fortsetzung folgt.

Quelle: GoMoPa (www.gomopa.net / Siegfried Siewert)

Google-Skandal: Google bestätigt Rechtswidrigkeit der “GoMoPa”-Einträge – löscht sie aber bis lang nicht trotz Zusage

Google-Skandal: Google bestätigt Rechtswidrigkeit der “GoMoPa”-Einträge – löscht sie aber bis lang nicht trotz Zusage und Strafanzeigen gegen Dr. Arndt Haller, Google, Deutschland nicht, stecken “Google-IM” mit “GoMoPa” unter einer Decke ? Sie Google-Mail: Re: [#717086735] Strafanzeigen gegen Dr. Arndt Haller [Fwd: FBI ermittelt nunmehr gegen Google Inc.: WEITERE STRAFANZEIGEN DRINGENDE ERINNERUNG: Re: AKTENZEICHEN DER KRIMINALPOLIZEI]]]]]]]] Sehr geehrter Herr Greenbaum,(mein Anwalt) vielen Dank für Ihre Geduld. Wir haben Ihre Beschwerde gemäß den in dem Land Ihres Wohnsitzes geltenden Gesetzen verarbeitet. Die folgenden Webseiten wurden aus Google (www.google.de) entfernt: http://www.gomopa.net/Pressemitteilungen.hxxxxx http://www.gomopa.net/Pressemitteilungen.xxxx http://pressreleaser.org/bernd-pulch-erpresser-xxxxx http://www.gomopa.net/Finanzforum/dubios/stalker-uxxxx https://scheisshausfliege.wordpress.com/2011/02/08/vxxxxx http://www.gomopa.net/Pressemitteilungen.htmlxxxxx https://scheisshausfliege.wordpress.com/2011xxxxxx Bitte lassen Sie es uns wissen, falls Sie noch weitere Fragen haben. Mit freundlichen Grüßen Ihr Google-Team Google Inc. Legal Support 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway Mountain View, CA 94043 USA VON RUFMÖRDERN u. Serienbetrügern erfundene “GoMoPa”: “Wer stoppt Google-Rufmorde?” Hier beschreibt “GoMoPa” – was sie tun und wie sie es tun. GoMoPa: Wer stoppt Google-Rufmorde? Freie Bahn für Rufmord, Stalking und Existenzvernichtung im Internet. Suchmaschinen lassen sich von Kriminellen als Mittäter missbrauchen. Beispiel Google. Jede Nachricht kann und darf gefaked sein, denn, so erklärt Oliver Klug von der Google-Presseagentur in Hamburg: “Für den Inhalt der Internetseiten ist Google nicht verantwortlich. Jeder Eingriff, außer bei schwerwiegenden Dingen wie Holocaust-Leugnungen, wäre eine unzulässige Zensur.” Das bedeutet im Klartext: Jeder kann mit Hilfe von Google jede nur erdenkliche Lüge über einen anderen Menschen oder über eine Firma verbreiten. Klug verteidigt das Google-System: “Sie können doch bei der Polizei Anzeige erstatten und Verleumder verklagen. Mit einem Gerichtsurteil löschen wir selbstverständlich die Seiten.” GoMoPa meint: Das klingt gut, ist aber realitätsfern. Die meisten Verleumder arbeiten anonym und melden ihre Hetzseiten unter falschen Angaben an. Das musste und muss GoMoPa am eigenen Leib erfahren. Der Finanznachrichtendienst wird seit anderthalb Jahren auf der Seite nepper-schlepper-bauernfaenger.com oder fuer-recht-und-ordnung.com mit Lügen von Hausdurchsuchungen, Festnahmen von Verantwortlichen oder angeblicher Strafanzeigen großer Banken überzogen. Natürlich wehrte sich GoMoPa mit juristischen Schritten. Doch der Verantwortliche der Nepper-Schlepper-Seite, die Rechtsanwaltskanzlei Atle Border mit Sitz in Bangkok (Thailand), ist frei erfunden. Der Server steht in Panama. Klug: “Ohne juristische Schritte können wir da nichts machen, das wäre Zensur.” GoMoPa konfrontierte die Google-Presseagentur daraufhin mit einer konstruierten Verleumdung gegen Google. Inhalt: “Die Verantwortliche (Admin C) der Google Germany GmbH, Frau Lena Tangerxxxx aus Hamburg, führt nicht nur ein dubioses Doppelleben als Domina in der Herbertstraße auf der Reeperbahn. Lena Tangerxxxx steht kurz vor der Verhaftung. Gegen sie wird wegen Schleusung von russischen Minderjährigen nach Deutschland und Vermittlung an einen belgischen Kinderpornoring ermittelt.” Die Seite könnte “www.google-schmutz.com” heißen. Anmelder wäre ein erfundener Dr. Alfred Motte aus Bangkok, der Server würde in Panama sitzen. Klug: Dagegen würde Google sofort mit rechtlichen Schritten vorgehen.” GoMoPa: Wie denn, wenn Sie den Absender gar nicht finden können? Darauf Klug: “Wir wüden prüfen, inwieweit anonyme Verleumdungen im Internet gegen unsere Nutzungsbestimmungen verstoßen.” Und aller Wahrscheinlichkeit nach sofort löschen?!! Wird da mit zweierlei Maß gemessen? Google empfiehlt uns jedenfalls lapidar in einer Mitteilung zu unserem Löschantrag, eventuelle Streitigkeiten direkt mit dem Eigentümer der betreffenden Website beizulegen und teilt weiterhin mit, zum gegenwärtigen Zeitpunkt keine Maßnahmen zur Entfernung der verleumdenden Inhalte ergreifen zu wollen. Fortsetzung folgt. Quelle: GoMoPa (www.gomopa.net / Siegfried Siewert)

Google-Skandal: Google bestätigt Rechtswidrigkeit der “GoMoPa”-Einträge – löscht sie aber bis lang nicht trotz Zusage

Google-Skandal: Google bestätigt Rechtswidrigkeit der "GoMoPa"-Einträge - löscht sie aber bis lang nicht trotz Zusage und Strafanzeigen gegen Dr. Arndt Haller, Google, Deutschland nicht, 
stecken "Google-IM" mit "GoMoPa" unter einer Decke ?

Sie Google-Mail:
  Re: [#717086735] Strafanzeigen gegen Dr. Arndt Haller [Fwd: FBI ermittelt nunmehr gegen Google Inc.: WEITERE STRAFANZEIGEN DRINGENDE ERINNERUNG: Re: AKTENZEICHEN DER KRIMINALPOLIZEI]]]]]]]]

Sehr geehrter Herr Greenbaum,(mein Anwalt)

vielen Dank für Ihre Geduld. Wir haben Ihre Beschwerde gemäß den in dem Land Ihres
Wohnsitzes geltenden Gesetzen verarbeitet. Die folgenden Webseiten wurden aus Google
(www.google.de) entfernt:

http://www.gomopa.net/Pressemitteilungen.hxxxxx
http://www.gomopa.net/Pressemitteilungen.xxxx
http://pressreleaser.org/bernd-pulch-erpresser-xxxxx
http://www.gomopa.net/Finanzforum/dubios/stalker-uxxxx
https://scheisshausfliege.wordpress.com/2011/02/08/vxxxxx
http://www.gomopa.net/Pressemitteilungen.htmlxxxxx
https://scheisshausfliege.wordpress.com/2011xxxxxx

Bitte lassen Sie es uns wissen, falls Sie noch weitere Fragen haben.

Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Ihr Google-Team

Google Inc.
Legal Support
1600 Amphitheatre Parkway
Mountain View, CA 94043
USA

VON RUFMÖRDERN u. Serienbetrügern erfundene “GoMoPa”: “Wer stoppt Google-Rufmorde?”

Hier beschreibt “GoMoPa” – was sie tun und wie sie es tun.

GoMoPa: Wer stoppt Google-Rufmorde?


Freie Bahn für Rufmord, Stalking und Existenzvernichtung im Internet. Suchmaschinen lassen sich von Kriminellen als Mittäter missbrauchen. Beispiel Google.

Jede Nachricht kann und darf gefaked sein, denn, so erklärt Oliver Klug von der Google-Presseagentur in Hamburg: “Für den Inhalt der Internetseiten ist Google nicht verantwortlich. Jeder Eingriff, außer bei schwerwiegenden Dingen wie Holocaust-Leugnungen, wäre eine unzulässige Zensur.” Das bedeutet im Klartext: Jeder kann mit Hilfe von Google jede nur erdenkliche Lüge über einen anderen Menschen oder über eine Firma verbreiten.

Klug verteidigt das Google-System: “Sie können doch bei der Polizei Anzeige erstatten und Verleumder verklagen. Mit einem Gerichtsurteil löschen wir selbstverständlich die Seiten.” GoMoPa meint: Das klingt gut, ist aber realitätsfern. Die meisten Verleumder arbeiten anonym und melden ihre Hetzseiten unter falschen Angaben an.

Das musste und muss GoMoPa am eigenen Leib erfahren. Der Finanznachrichtendienst wird seit anderthalb Jahren auf der Seite nepper-schlepper-bauernfaenger.com oder fuer-recht-und-ordnung.com mit Lügen von Hausdurchsuchungen, Festnahmen von Verantwortlichen oder angeblicher Strafanzeigen großer Banken überzogen. Natürlich wehrte sich GoMoPa mit juristischen Schritten. Doch der Verantwortliche der Nepper-Schlepper-Seite, die Rechtsanwaltskanzlei Atle Border mit Sitz in Bangkok (Thailand), ist frei erfunden. Der Server steht in Panama. Klug: “Ohne juristische Schritte können wir da nichts machen, das wäre Zensur.”

GoMoPa konfrontierte die Google-Presseagentur daraufhin mit einer konstruierten Verleumdung gegen Google. Inhalt: “Die Verantwortliche (Admin C) der Google Germany GmbH, Frau Lena Tangerxxxx aus Hamburg, führt nicht nur ein dubioses Doppelleben als Domina in der Herbertstraße auf der Reeperbahn. Lena Tangerxxxx steht kurz vor der Verhaftung. Gegen sie wird wegen Schleusung von russischen Minderjährigen nach Deutschland und Vermittlung an einen belgischen Kinderpornoring ermittelt.”

Die Seite könnte “www.google-schmutz.com” heißen. Anmelder wäre ein erfundener Dr. Alfred Motte aus Bangkok, der Server würde in Panama sitzen. Klug: Dagegen würde Google sofort mit rechtlichen Schritten vorgehen.” GoMoPa: Wie denn, wenn Sie den Absender gar nicht finden können? Darauf Klug: “Wir wüden prüfen, inwieweit anonyme Verleumdungen im Internet gegen unsere Nutzungsbestimmungen verstoßen.” Und aller Wahrscheinlichkeit nach sofort löschen?!!

Wird da mit zweierlei Maß gemessen? Google empfiehlt uns jedenfalls lapidar in einer Mitteilung zu unserem Löschantrag, eventuelle Streitigkeiten direkt mit dem Eigentümer der betreffenden Website beizulegen und teilt weiterhin mit, zum gegenwärtigen Zeitpunkt keine Maßnahmen zur Entfernung der verleumdenden Inhalte ergreifen zu wollen. Fortsetzung folgt.

Quelle: GoMoPa (www.gomopa.net / Siegfried Siewert)

DER “SPIEGEL” ÜBER DIE DOPPELROLLE VON “GoMoPa”-“AUTOR RESCH UND DIE STASI

http://www.spiegel.de/spiegel/print/d-65717414.html

DER “STERN” ÜBER CYBERSTALKING DER FINGIERTEN SERIENBETRÜGER DER “GoMoPa”

http://www.stern.de/…/cyberstalking-wer-verfolgt-wird-muss-sich-wehren-653334.html

An Ihren Händen klebt Blut – Cyber-Opfer enthüllen: Wie charakter-und gewissenlose Cybermörder ihre Opfer per Rufmord in den Herztod treiben wollen

Die Cybermord-Opfer Lothar Berresheim, Dipl.-Ing. Paul Bösel, Andreas Decker, Herbert Ernst, Meridian Capital, Bernd Pulch und Martin Sachs, klären über den kriminellen und serienmässig vorbestraften Ex-Gefängnissinsassen Klaus-Dieter Maurischat (Photo) Az. AZ: 28 Ls 85/05, Aktenzeichen Hamburg 035/1K/608828/2010, KRIPO Wiesbaden (ST 1044410/2010) u.v.a. und seine GoMoPa-Erpresserbande und deren Helfershelfer und Auftraggeber auf. Deren verbrecherische Aktivitäten haben den Herz-Tod des Anlegerschützers Heinz Gerlach durch eine infame Rufmord-Kampagne herbeigeführt. Zwei weitere Journalisten wurden erst kürzlich mit Herzversagen in Krankenhäuser eingeliefert werden.
Maurischat arbeitet oft im Auftrag. So auch für die SJB- sagen zumindest die sich betrogen fühlenden, gedemütigten SJB-Fondsopfer.
Nachfolgend publizieren wir eine der besten Darstellungen zum Thema Cyber-Terrorismus. Besonders pikant dabei der Bericht über die Maurischat-Festname durch das BKA.
Klaus-Dieter Maurischat hat nach Angaben von Meridian Capital bereits 23 Gerichtsurteile wegen einschlägiger Vergehen und ist im Gegensatz zu seinen Cyber-Opfern tatsächlich vorbestraft (zum Beispiel: Krefeld vom 24. April 2006; AZ: 28 Ls 85/05)
Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. London, seit Jahren im Kampf gegen den Cyber-Terrorismus aktiv, enthüllt neue kriminelle Erscheinungen im Netz
I. Sachverhalt
In der letzten Zeit taucht im Netz immer häufiger eine neue zugleich eine sehr beunruhigende Erscheinung krimineller Art auf. Professionelle Verbrechergruppen im Netz nehmen daran teil, die zu Erpressungen, Betrügereien, Erschwindeln in Bezug auf bestimmte gezielt ausgesuchte Firmen und Unternehmen fähig sind. Diese Kriminellen entwickelten neue Methoden und Mittel, sich einfach und in kurzer Zeit zu bereichern.
Strategien und Erscheinungsformen, welche diesem Prozedere zugrunde liegen, sind recht einfach.
Ein Krimineller sucht sich „sorgfältig“ im Internet spezielle Firmen und Korporationen (Opfer des Verbrechens) aus und informiert diese im nächsten Schritt darüber, dass über die Geschäftstätigkeit solcher Firmen und Korporationen in der nächsten Zeit – zuerst im Internet dann in weiteren zugänglichen Massenmedien – zahlreiche und äußerst ungünstige Informationen erscheinen.
Gleichzeitig schlagen die Kriminellen ihren künftigen Opfern – wie Magister Bernd Pulch – eine wirksame Hilfe, unnötigen Schwierigkeiten und Problemen zu entkommen, welche auf Verlust des guten Namens und Images der betroffenen Firma und Korporation abzielen. Diese Straftäter sind sich dessen bewusst, dass guter Ruf, Name und Aussehen jedes Unternehmens ein Wert in sich selbst sei. Es sei also ein Wert, wofür jedes Unternehmen bereit ist, jeglichen Preis zu zahlen. Bloß aus dem Grunde, um Schwierigkeiten und Probleme zu vermeiden, welche aus dem Verlust des guten Namens und Rufes resultieren.
Die Straftäter und ihre Opfer sind sich dessen im Klaren, dass dieser Verlust verheerende Konsequenzen zur Folge haben mag, die das Stilllegen einer bestimmten Geschäftstätigkeit erzwingen können. Dies nimmt sowohl auf Kein- als auch auf Großunternehmen Bezug. Die betrifft Firmen, die praktisch in jeder Branche und in jedem Land grenzüberschreitend tätig sind.
Das kriminelle Prozedere in Form einer Erpressung aufs Geld, eines Betrugs entwickelt sich heutzutage rasant und wird global, d.h. grenzüberschreitend und international geführt. Zu Opfer der Erpressung, des Betrugs fallen heutzutage sowohl heimisch wirkende (inländische) als auch internationale Korporationen, die großen Wert auf Erhaltung, Behalten und Pflege ihres guten Rufes dem entsprechend ihrer geschäftlichen Glaubwürdigkeit legen.
Die Kriminellen im Netz haben begriffen, dass die Pflege eines unantastbaren Rufes und Namens eines Unternehmens die einzigartige Möglichkeit auf schnelle und einfache Bereicherung bildet.
Das oben erwähnte kriminelle Vorgehen ist schwer zu verfolgen, weil es internationaler Natur ist und durch verschobene oder gar nicht existierende (fiktive) Berufs- und Justizpersonen in verschiedenen Ländern firmiert und betrieben wird.
Diese Straftäter im Netz veröffentlichen, unterbringen und verbreiten wahrheitswidrige Informationen über Ihre Opfer auf weit entlegenen Servern, welche sich nicht selten oft in exotischen Ländern befinden. Es sind diejenigen Staaten, in denen gravierende Lücken im Rechtssystem, Ermittlungs- und Verfolgungsverfahren sichtbar sind. Als Beispiel kann an dieser Stelle Indien erwähnt werden.
Mit den Verbrechern im Netz arbeiten Netzportale Führer von bekannten Blogs mit Ihrem Sitz -bewusst oder unbewusst- auch in den hoch entwickelnden Ländern zusammen. Beispielsweise können an dieser Stelle Länder wie Deutschland, Österreich, die Schweiz, die USA, Großbritannien, Spanien oder Portugal erwähnt werden.
Die unten aufgelisteten Kriminellen konnten bis heute weitgehend unbestraft handeln. Als Symptom derartigen Handelns taucht hier die Tätigkeit und „Wirksamkeit“ der Firma GOMOPAauf, welche sich über Länder wie die Bundesrepublik Deutschland, die Schweiz, Österreich, die USA, Großbritannien, Spanien und Indien erstreckt. Ein gutes Beispiel eines derartigen Handelns ist Herr Klaus Maurischat – der Anführer und „Gehirn” der Firma GOMOPA mit vielen bereits in Kraft getretenen Straftaten und Urteilen „auf seinem Konto”, der auf diese Art und Weise jahrelang seinen Unterhalt finanzierte und in der Branche nahezu unbegrenzt aktiv war (erst jüngst mutmasslich im Auftrag der SJB, Korschenbroich/Neuss).
Dieser Stand ändert sich jedoch drastisch, u.a. dank weit und breit geführten Maßnahmen der Firma Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd., welche sich gegen solche Strafdelikte im Netz richten. Auch andere Firmen und Korporationen, welche dem Verbrechen im Netz und außerhalb dieses Mediums zu Opfer gefallen sind, tragen zur Bekämpfung solcher Delikte bei.
Die Lage ändert sich auch dank wirksamen Schritten und der erfolgreichen Zusammenarbeit der Firma Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. mit der internationalen Polizei Interpol, mit der Bundesagentur (FBI) in den USA, mit der BUNDESKRIMINALPOLIZEI in Deutschland, mit SCOTLAND YARD in Großbritannien, sowie mit dem Russischen Geheimdienst FSB.
Die Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. – gemeinsam mit weiteren Firmen und Kooperationen, die zu Opfer krimineller Aktivitäten des Netzverbrechens gefallen sind – hat unbestreitbar schon erste Erfolge zu verzeichnen.
Dass im November 2008 auf dem Territorium der Bundesrepublik Deutschland der oben erwähnte Anführer und „Gehirn“ der Firma GOMOPA, Herr Klaus Maurishat festgenommen wurde, darf nicht außer Acht gelassen werden. Aus den derMeridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. zur Verfügung stehenden Informationen resultiert eindeutig, dass die nächsten Verhaftungen der an diesem Prozedere teilnehmenden Personen in solchen Ländern wie: Österreich, die Schweiz, Russland, die Ukraine, Polen, Spanien, Mexiko, Portugal, Brasilien, die USA, Kanada, Großbritannien, Irland, Australien, New Seeland und in a. erfolgen.
Das oberste Ziel der Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. sowie der weiteren Opfer des Verbrechens im Netz ist es, alle Teilnehmer dieses kriminellen Prozedere vor das zuständige Gericht zu führen.
Alle Berufs- und Justizpersonen, unabhängig vom Sitz und der ausgeübten Geschäftstätigkeit, welche dem oben beschriebenen kriminellen Vorgehen (Betrug, Erpressung) zu Opfer gefallen sind, können der von der Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. geführten Kompanie beitreten, die sich zum Ziel setzt, alle an dem an dieser Stelle dargestellten Prozedere Mitbeteiligten aus dem öffentlichen sowie dem wirtschaftlichen Leben auszuschließen.
II. Schwarze Liste mit internationalen Erpressern und Betrügern sowie Ihre Methoden (opus operandi) in den folgenden Ländern:
1. Die Bundesrepublik Deutschland
2. Dubai
3. Russland
1. Die Bundesrepublik Deutschland
GOMOPA GmbH, Goldman Morgenstern & Partners LLC., Goldman Morgenstern & Partners Consulting LLC, Wottle Inkasso Büro. In diesen Firmen sind folgende Personen recht aktiv:
– Klaus Maurischat („Vater” und „Gehirn” der kriminellen Organisation, der für den unzählige rechtskräftige Urteile zu verzeichnen sind (festgenommen in Deutschland im November 2008);
– Rudolf Josef Heckel („rechte Hand” bei Herrn Klaus Maurischat, ehemaliger denunzierter Banker, der an vielen maßlosen Bankschmuggeleien mitbeteiligt war. (Heutzutage persona non grata im deutschen Bankwesen);
– Peter Reski (zuständig für das Finanzwesen, bekannt für Betrug, Fälschungen und Steuerunterschlagungen, hinter denen bereits rechtkräftige Urteile stehen);
– Mark Vornkahl (zuständig für organisatorisch-administrative Aufgaben beiGOMOPA, ehemaliger Polizeibeamter, entlassen wegen zahlreichem Verstießen im Dienst, hat bereits ein paar rechtskräftige Urteile „auf seinem Konto“);
– Claus i Ulrike Wottle (Ehepaar, für das sogenannte „unkonventionelle” Vollstrecken der Schulden vor allem zugunsten GOMOPA. Dieser Vollstreckung lagen Erzwingung, Erpressung mit Gewalt zugrunde, die auf sowohl tatsachliche als auch fiktive Schulden Bezug nahmen?
Wie funktioniert das System von GOMOPA
Die oben in Kurze erwähnten Personen, sowie die mit dem Service GOMOPAKooperierenden, so genannte „GOMOPA-Experten“, Bloggers und alle weiteren Berufs-und Justizpersonen suchen sich aus allen möglichen Quellen Informationen über große, reichen Firmen und Korporationen aus, welche in verschiedenen heimischen und internationalen Wirtschaftszweigen tätig sind. Dem Service GOMOPA liegt besonders daran, dass man diejenigen aussucht, die „in Sich selbst ins Auge fallen”. Diejenigen Firmen und Korporationen also, gegen die relativ einfach und ohne großen Aufwand sich Vorwürfe, Unstimmigkeiten u. s. w. sich machen lassen, in bezug auf die sogar Straftaten wie Erschwindeln und Betrügen u. a. sich leicht vorführen lassen. Es ist allgemein bekannt, dass jeder Firma besonders an ihrer guten Präsenz und an ihrem unantastbaren Namen liegt. Jedes Unternehmen wird dem entsprechend alles tun, um ihre gute Präsenz also auch ihre Glaubwürdigkeit beibehalten zu können. Wenn aber zum Opfer des GOMOPA und seiner „Partner” ein großes und reiches Unternehmen fällt, so kann man sich an solchen Unternehmen schnell, einfach und sogar beachtlich bereichern.
Es taucht an dieser Stelle die Frage auf:
Welcher schlaue Straftäter, der im Netz und außerhalb des Netzes mir Erfolg wirkt, möchte daraus kein Nutzen ziehen?
Die Kriminellen im Netz wissen genau, dass ohne geschäftliche Glaubwürdigkeit kein Vertrauen vorhanden sei, welches jeder Geschäftstätigkeit unentbehrlich ist. GOMOPAsowie alle mit dem Kooperierenden haben mit Sicherheit alle möglichen Methoden und Maßnahmen beherrscht, wie man Glaubwürdigkeit und Vertrauen einer Firma, eines Unternehmens, einer Korporation (Verbrechensopfer) in Frage stellt.
Dies zieht eben die Aufmerksamkeit der User an, so dass die Homepage des GOMOPAwww.gomopa.net in den Suchmaschinen wie Google, Yahoo leicht auffindbar ist. Dies wiederum bedeutet nichts anderes als Zusatzprofite für das Service GOMOPA , weil um seine Tätigkeit herum ein mediales Diskurs geschaffen wird.
Ein auf den ersten Blick banales und einfaches Opfer der Erpressung kann beispielsweise eine öffentliche, staatliche Instanz, welche auf Basis der öffentlichen Glaubwürdigkeit funktioniert, werden, wie eine Bank oder ein bankfremdes Finanzinstitut. So war es eben mit dem bankfremden, internationalen FinanzinstitutMeridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. der Fall.
Ein einfaches und leichtes Opfer de illegalen und materiellen Gewinns können auch die Versicherungsgesellschaften werden, bei denen – wie es aus unseren Recherchen resultiert-, vieles auf die kriminelle Tätigkeit des GOMOPA vor allem auf dem Gebiet der Bundesrepublik Deutschland, der Schweiz und Österreich zurückzuführen sei. Unter den bekannten und erkennbaren Opfern sind mit Sicherheit deutsche, österreichische und schweizerische Banken, Versicherungsgesellschaften wie z.B. Allianz aus Deutschland, deutsche und österreichische Firmen wie HDI und DKV sichtbar.
Dies, wozu sich das Service GOMOPA traut und was die mit dem kooperierenden Services, Blogs heutzutage praktizieren, ist das so genannte Cyber-Stalking, welches sich rasant im Netz verbreitet. Die kriminelle Methode besteht an dieser Stelle u. a. im Bedrohen, dass über die Geschäftstätigkeit eines Unternehmens (Ofer der Erpressung, Erzwingung und Bedrohung) fiktive, gar nicht existierende Informationen (Lügen, Gerüchte, Geschichtchen, Nachrede, Beleidigungen) zuerst im Netz dann in anderen Massenmedien veröffentlicht werden. Dies dient lediglich dazu, um ein potenzielles Opfer dazu zu bewegen, eine beachtliche Geldsumme für die so genannte „Ruhe“ dem Erpresser bereitzustellen. Die „Ruhe” bedeutet hier das Versprechen einer Zugangssperre in Bezug auf die Veröffentlichung jeglicher fiktiven Information im Netz und in allen weiteren Massenmedien, die die Opfer der Erpressung im äußerst negativen Licht darstellen kann.
Derartige Bedrohungen setzen sich, wie bereits oben erwähnt zum Ziel, Firmen – potenzielle Opfer des Cyber-Stalking dazu zu veranlassen, dass sie sich selbst „aufkaufen“. Kurz gesagt, GOMOPA und seinesgleichen, sowie die mit denen kooperierenden Services und Blogs, kreieren eine „virtuelle Wirklichkeit”, oder anders gesagt, publizieren fiktive Informationen über potenzielle Opfer eines Verbrechens. Firmen und Korporationen, welche gegen Bedrohung und Erpressung seitens GOMOPAnicht fällig sind, diejenigen also, welche für so genannte „Ruhe“ nicht zahlen wollen, werden zum Opfern schwerwiegender Lügen, Beleidigungen, Insinuationen und anderer krimineller Unterschlagungen, die Aussehen und Präsenz einer Firma mit Sicherheit beeinträchtigen.
Eines gilt als Ziel des GOMOPA, nämlich so schnell und so einfach, wie es geht, das Geld abzukassieren, und wenn sich eine Firma weigert und sich die „Ruhe“ nicht kaufen möchte, wird sie unerwartet und blitzschnell zum Objekt der Erpressung und Beleidigung im Netz.
An dieser Stelle taucht folgende Frage auf: Wie ist es möglich, dass der Anführer der Firma GOMOPA, Herr Klaus Maurischat, der nur in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland auf seinem „Konto” 23 Gerichtsurteile hat, sich jahrelang als einen ehrlichen Bürger kreieren, zugleich anderen Personen, Firmen, Korporationen verbrecherische Taten, Delikte einprägen, dazu noch daran beachtliche Geldsummen verdienen konnte? Dieses komplexe Prozedere kann nur folgendermaßen erklärt werden:
GOMOPA kreiert sein Aussehen, seine Präsenz in den Augen der öffentlichen Meinung als ein ehrliches Subjekt, welches gegen pathologische Erscheinungen des öffentlichen und wirtschaftlichen Alltags einschreitet. GOMOPA und seine Partner (Services, Blogs) stellen sich als Verfolger jeglicher Verbrechensart dar, versprechen also den Kampf gegen jeden virtuellen Verbrecher im Netz (insbesondere gegen jeden Betrüger, Erpresser). GOMOPA verwendet in dieser Hinsicht eine Art „Merketingsvorhang” als Methode der Verführung, infolge dessen es sein wahres „Antlitz“ und seine wahren Intentionen als die eines Betrügers und Erpressers aufs Geld verbergen kann. Die wahren Absichten des GOMOPA, der mit GOMOPA zusammen arbeitenden Services und Blogs konnten bis heute zweifelsohne mit Erfolg vor der öffentlichen Meinung versteckt bleiben, vor allem dank des so genannten „Rauchvorhangs“, welcher sich darin widerspiegelt, dass man sich selbst als „Sieger“ jeglichen Missbrauchs und jeder pathologischen Erscheinung des öffentlichen und wirtschaftlichen Lebens in Deutschaland, Österreich, der Schweiz, den USA, Großbritannien, Russland, Spanien kreiert.
Als nächstes taucht die von dem GOMOPA vorgeschobene Person auf, welche Firmen und Korporationen – die künftigen Opfer des Verbrechens also – vor der Möglichkeit der Veröffentlichung von äußerst ungünstigen und das betroffene Unternehmen in einem negativen Licht darstellenden Informationen im Internet und in weiteren Massenmedien warnt. Die Person, von der hier die Rede ist, informiert zugleich, dass sie sich mit Erfolg gegen so ein Prozedere für ein entsprechendes „Honorar“ einsetzen kann. Der GOMOPA geht es an dieser Stelle um die Erpressung aufs Geld für so genannte „Ruhe” um die Firma und Korporation (Opfer eines Verbrechens) herum. Meistens wird seitens der betroffenen Firmen auf solche Bedrohungen überhaupt nicht reagiert, weil sie zu ihrem Alltag und ihrer Tagesordnung gehören. Es fehlt schließlich kaum an Erpressern im Netz und außerhalb des Mediums. Normalerweise kommt es also selten zu so genannter „Verständigung”, wobei auf der einen Seite die Verbrechensopfer, auf der anderen Seite das GOMOPA auftritt. Es ist verständlich, dass der Preis für so eine „Verständigung” die Bereitstellung der von dem GOMOPA geforderten Gelder wäre. Die finanzielle Erpressung wird in dieser Etappe selten vollzogen. Die Lage ändert sich jedoch kaum, wenn die Firmen und Korporationen (Verbrechensopfer) erfahren, dass die Bedrohung erfüllt sei. In Kurze erscheinen auf der Homepage http://www.gomopa.netzahlreiche Presseartikel, Schein-berichte und Pseudomarktanalysen, die sowohl durchGOMOPA als auch durch so genannte „unabhängige Experten“ firmiert und vertreten werden, die mit GOMOPA formal oder fiktiv zusammenarbeiten. Informationen, hier publiziert, entsprechen den Inhalten aus einer Bedrohung und stellen die Geschäftstätigkeit der Personen, Firmen und Korporationen in einem äußerst negativen Licht dar.
Es unterliegt keinem Zweifel, dass derartige Maßnahmen und Methoden bloß auf Beeinträchtigung des guten Namens und der guten Präsenz dieser Firmen und Korporationen abzielen.
Die Tätigkeit von GOMOPA ist damit mit Sicherheit nicht ausgeschöpft. GOMOPAverbreitet (publiziert, unterbringt) die oben dargestellten Informationen im Netz, indem es sich der glaubwürdigen, populären und meinungsbildenden Services bedient. Mehr noch, GOMOPA droht den Firmen und Korporationen (seinen Opfern), dass die „aus dem Finger gezogenen“ Informationen nicht nur im Netz, sondern auch im Fernsehen und im Radio und in der Presselandschaft erscheinen.
Wie die Erfahrung und das bisherige Fachwissen der Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. zeigen, sind sich die Services meistens nicht dessen bewusst, dass sie zum Zwecke eines kriminellen Vorgehens durch das GOMOPA genutzt werden. Sie stimmen dem entsprechend mit den fiktiven Publikationen, Berichten und Analysen überein, welche speziell durch GOMOPA sowie durch „unabhängige“ Experten präpariert sind.
Es kommt auch vor, dass die Services und Blogs einer derartigen Zusammenarbeit mit dem GOMOPA Zustimmung erteilen, wobei sie genau wissen, dass die von GOMOPAübermittelten Informationen fiktiv sind und die Glaubwürdigkeit der Firmen und Korporationen beeinträchtigen. Sie nehmen also bewusst an dem kriminellen Prozedere teil. Die Erklärung dieser Lage ist recht einfach. GOMOPA zahlt nämlich den Services und Blogs entsprechende Vergütung, dass sie der Veröffentlichung von unwahren Informationen über die Firmen und Korporationen (Verbrechensopfer) zustimmen.
Einige Services und Blogs scheinen nichts davon gewusst zu haben, dass die auf ihren Seiten zur Verfügung gestellten Informationen „fiktiv“ und „aus dem Finger gezogen“ sind. Sie suchen auf diese Art und Weise ihre Verhaltensweise zu rechtfertigen, denn sie wollen den rechtlichen Konsequenzen wegen der Teilnahme am Missbrauch des guten Namens und Aussehens einer Firma oder Korporation entkommen.
Das Tätigkeitssystem von GOMOPA, von zusammenarbeitenden Services und Blogs wurde auch am Beispiel der Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. ausgetestet.
Anfang Oktober 2008 erhielt einer der Arbeiter der Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. eine Meldung von einem anonymen Sender, dass in naher Zukunft – zuerst im Internet, dann im Fernsehen, im Radio und in der deutschen Presse – Informationen erscheinen, die die Funktionsweise und Tätigkeiten der Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. in einem äußerst negativen Licht darstellen. Der Mitarbeiter derMeridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. wurde also informiert, dass diese Meldungen/Nachrichten zweifelsohne deutlich das Aussehen und den guten Ruf der Firma Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. beeinträchtigen.
Der an dieser Stelle erwähnte „Gesprächspartner” hat den Angestellten der Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. informiert, dass die Möglichkeit besteht die peinliche Situation zu vermeiden, indem die Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. auf das von der Person gezeigte Konto die Summe von 100.000,00 EUR überweist. Wie sich aber später zeigte, war der Herr Klaus Maurischat – dieser anonyme Gesprächspartner – „Gehirn“ und „Lider desGOMOPA“. Die Ermittlungen wurden angestellt durch die Bundeskriminalpolizei(Verfolgungs- und Ermittlungsorgan auf der Bundesebene) während des Ermittlungsverfahrens wegen einer finanziellen Erpressung, Betrügereien auch wegen der Bedrohungen, welche von Herrn Maurischat und seinen Mitarbeiter praktiziert wurden und werden sowie wegen Teilnahme anderer (Leiter der Internetservices und Moderatoren der Blogs) an diesem Prozedere. Diese Straftaten wurden begangen zu Schaden vieler Berufs- und Justizpersonen, darunter auch der Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. Die Opfer dieses Verbrechens sind in Deutschland, Österreich, der Schweiz, Spanien, Portugal, Großbritannien, den USA und Kanada sichtbar.
In diesem Moment taucht folgende Frage auf: Wie war die Reaktion der Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. auf die Forderungen seitens GOMOPA? Entsprach die Reaktion den Erwartungen von GOMOPA? Hat die Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. die geforderte Summe 100.000,00 EUR überwiesen?
Seites der Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. gab es überhaupt keine Reaktion auf den Erpressungsversuch von GOMOPA. Ende August 2008 auf dem Service http://www.gompa.net sind zahlreiche Artikel/Meldungen erscheinen, welche die Tätigkeit derMeridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. in einem sehr negativen Licht dargestellt haben. Nachdem die auf http://www.gomopa.net enthaltenen Informationen ausführlich und vollständig analysiert worden waren, ergab es sich, dass sie der Wahrheit nicht einmal in einem Punkt entsprechen und potenzielle und bereits bestehende Kunden derMeridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. in Bezug auf die von diesem Finanzinstitut geführten Geschäftstätigkeit irreführen. Infolge der kriminellen Handlugen von GOMOPA und der mit ihm kooperierenden Services und Blogs im Netz hat die Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. beachtliche und messbare geschäftliche Verluste erlitten. Die Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. hat nämlich in erster Linie eine wichtige Gruppe von potenziellen Kunden verloren. Was sich aber als wichtiger erwies, es haben sich die bisherigen Kunden von der Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. kaum abgewandt. Diejenigen Kunden haben unsere Dienstleitungen weiterhin genutzt und nutzen diese immer noch. In Hinblick auf die bisherige Zusammenarbeit mit der Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd., werden ihrerseits dem entsprechend keine Einwände erhoben .
GOMOPA hat so einen Verlauf der Ereignisse genau prognostiziert, dessen Ziel beachtliche und messbare geschäftliche durch die Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.erlittene Verluste waren. Der Verlauf der Ereignisse hat GOMOPA mit Sicherheit gefreut. GOMOPA hat nämlich darmit gerechnet, dass die Markt-Stellung derMeridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. nachlässt und das Finanzinstitut die geforderte Summe (100.000,00 EUR) bereitstellt. Im Laufe der Zeit, als das ganze Prozedere im Netz immer populärer war, versuchte GOMOPA noch vier mal zu der Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. Kontakte aufzunehmen, indem es jedes mal das Einstellen dieser kriminellen „Kampagne” versprochen hat, wobei es jedes mal seine finanziellen Forderungen heraufsetzte. Die letzte für das Einstellen der „Kampagne“ gegen dieMeridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. vorgesehene Quote betrug sogar 5.000.000,00 EUR (in Worten: fünf Milionen EURO). Die Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.konnte sich aber trotz der sich ständig steigenden Forderungen seitens GOMOPA im Markt behaupten.
Im Oktober 2008 traf die Leitung der Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.Entscheidung über die Benachrichtigung der Internationalen Polizei INTERPOL sowie entsprechender Strafverfolgungsorgane der BRD (die Polizei und die Staatsanwaltschaft) über den bestehenden Sachverhalt. In der Zwischenzeit meldeten sich bei der Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. zahlreiche Firmen und Korporationen, sogar Berufsperson wie Ärzte, Richter, Priester, Schauspieler und anderen Personen aus unterschiedlichen Ländern der Welt, die der Erpressung von GOMOPA nachgegeben und die geforderten Geldsummen überwiesen haben. Diese Personen gaben bereits Erklärungen ab, dass sie dies getan haben, damit man sie bloß endlich „in Ruhe lässt” und um unnötige Probleme, Schwierigkeiten und einen kaum begründbaren Ausklang vermeiden zu können. Die Opfer dieses kriminellen Vorgehens haben die Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. über unterschiedliche Geldsummen, welche verlangt wurden, informiert.
In einem Fall gab es verhältnismäßig kleine (um ein paar tausend EURO), in einem anderen Fall handelte es schon um beachtliche Summen (rund um paar Millionen EURO).
Zusätzlich wendeten sich an die Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. Firmen, welche der GOMOPA noch keine „Gebühr” überweisen haben und bereits überlegen, ob sie dies tun sollen, oder nicht. Diese Firmen erwarteten von der Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. eine klare Stellungnahme sowie eine professionelle praktische Beratung, wie man sich in solch einer Lage verhalten soll und wie man diese Geldforderungen umgehen kann. Die Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. hat ausnahmslos allen Verbrechensopfern, welche sich bei unserer Firma gemeldet haben, eine Zusammenarbeit vorgeschlagen. Als oberste Aufgabe stellt sich diese Kooperation, gemeinsam entschlossene und wirksame Maßnahmen gegen GOMOPA, gegen andere Services im Netz sowie gegen alle Bloggers zu treffen, die an dem hier beschriebenen internationalen kriminellen Vorgehen mit GOMOPA-Führung teilnehmen.
Alle diese Firmen traten einem so genannten von der Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. vorgeschlagenen „Kreuzzug” gegen GOMOPA, seine Partner bei. Auf unsere Bitte benachrichtigten alle mitbeteiligten Firmen die Internationale Polizei INTERPOL sowie ihre heimischen Verfolgungsorgane, u. a. die zuständige Staatsanwaltschaft und die Polizeibehörden über den bestehenden Sachverhalt.
In Hinblick auf die Tatsache, dass das verbrecherische Handeln von GOMOPA sich über viele Staaten erstreckte und dass die Anzahl der in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland erstatteten Anzeigen wegen der durch GOMOPA, Internetservices und Bloggers begangenen Straftaten, rasant wuchs – was zweifelsohne von einer weit gehenden kriminellen Wirkungskraft des GOMOPA zeugt – schlug die Internationale Wirtschaftspolizei INTERPOL der Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. vor, dass sich ihr Vertreter in Berlin mit dem Vertreter von GOMOPA trifft, um die „Zahlungsmodalitäten“ und Überweisung der Summe von 5.000.000,00 EUR zu besprechen. Dieser Schritt sollte, eine gut durchdachte und durch dieBundeskriminalpolizei organisierte Falle durchzuführen, deren Ziel die Festnahme der unter GOMOPA wirkenden internationalen Straftäter war.
Die koordinierten Schritte und Maßnahmen der Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.und anderer Beschädigter, geleitet von der Internationalen Wirtschaftspolizei INTERPOL, dem Bundeskriminalamt und der Staatsanwaltschaft der Bundesrepublik Deutschland haben zur Aus-, Einarbeitung und Durchführung der oben beschriebenen Falle beigetragen. Im November 2008 führte die in Berlin vorbereitete Falle zur Festnahme und Verhaftung des Vertreters des GOMOPA, der nach der Festnahme auf Herrn Klaus Maurichat – als den Hauptverantwortlichen und Anführer der internationalen kriminellen Gruppe GOMOPA verwies. Der Festgenommene benannte und zeigte der Bundeskriminalpolizei zugleich den aktuellen Aufenthaltsort des Herrn Klaus Maurischat. „Gehirn“ und Gründer dieser internationalen kriminellen Gruppe GOMOPA. Herr Klaus Maurischat wurde am selben Tag auch festgenommen und auf Frist verhaftet, wird bald in Anklagezustand gestellt, wird die Verantwortung für eigene Straftaten und die des Forums GOMOPA vor einem zuständigen Bundesgericht tragen. Die Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. unternahm bereits alle möglichen Schritte, damit Herr Klaus Maurischat auch auf der Anklagebank des zuständigen Gerichts des Vereinigten Königsreiches Großbritannien erscheint. Unter den beschädigten Berufs- und Justizpersonen aus Großbritannien, neben der Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. gibt es noch viele Opfer von GOMOPA:
Der Begin der Verhaftungen mit so einem Ausmaß bedeutet für die deutsche Justiz einen ausschlaggebenden und bahnbrechenden Punkt. Bemerkenswert ist, dass die Verfolgungsorgane der Bundesrepublik sich bis zu diesem Zeitpunkt der langjährigen kriminellen Tätigkeit des Herrn Klaus Maurischat und seiner Mitarbeiter machtlos zeigten.
Die langdauernde Straflosigkeit des kriminellen Vorgehens des Herrn Klaus Maurischat, der jahrelang die „Erste Geige” bei GOMOPA spielte, ist zu Ende gegangen.
An dieser Stelle taucht noch eine Frage auf: wie wird’s weiter gehen?
Die Festnahme des Herrn Klaus Maurischat ist ein ausschlaggebender Moment, anders gesagt eine „Wende um 180 Grad” für ihn persönlich. Es bedeutet aber auch den „Anfang vom Ende“ für seine Mitarbeiter, für die Internetservices, Bloggers, die mit GOMOPA so gerne und ohne Widerspruch zusammengearbeitet hatten. Es unterliegt keinem Zweifel, dass die Sache vom Herrn Klaus Maurischat an der Spitze des „Eisbergs” steht. Der oben erwähnte Wendepunkt zu dieser Frage wird weitere Festnahmen und Verhaftungen der GOMOPA-Mitglieder mit sich bringen, sowie aller Personen aus allen möglichen Gebieten, die an diesem grenzüberschreitenden kriminellen Vorgehen teilgenommen haben.
Aus Informationen, welche der Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. vorliegen, resultiert, dass die nächsten Festnahmen aktuell vorbreitet werden, die mit dem Services GOMOPA zusammenarbeitende Personen betreffen. Dies wird auf Personen außerhalb Deutschland – von wo der Herr Klaus Maurischat kommt – bezug nehmen. Die Einzelheiten dürfen an dieser Stelle in Hinblick auf Rechtsgut und Verlauf der durch die Verfolgungsorgane der BRG und der INTERPOL geführten Untersuchung leider nicht verraten werden.
Die Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. kann momentan lediglich eine verbindliche Information aus der geführten Untersuchung der Öffentlichkeit bekannt geben, die die strafrechtliche Haftung nicht zu Folge haben wird.
In diesem Moment also werden intensive Vorbereitungen auf Verhaftung einer Reihe von Personen außerhalb der Bundesrepublik Deutschland getroffen.
Dies betrifft insbesondere folgende Länder wie:
– Russische Föderation
– die Ukraine
– Polen
– Spanien
– Mexiko
– Portugal
– Brasilien
– die Vereinigten Staaten von Amerika
– Kanada
– Großbritannien
– Irland
– Australien
– New Seeland
– Indien.
Alle Berufs- und Justizpersonen, unabhängig vom Land, in dem sie das Amt begleiten, oder dessen Bürger sind, und die bis jetzt bewusst oder unbewusst mit dem Forum GOMOPA zusammengearbeitet haben, oder weiterhin zusammenarbeiten, erregen den Verdacht der Internationalen Polizei INTERPOL. Diese Polizei arbeitet mit der Kriminalpolizei in jedem Land, um die oben erwähnten Personen zuerst identifizieren und dann die juristisch verfolgen zu können.
Informationen zu diesem Thema, sowie über Anfang und Ende der Tätigkeit des GOMOPA kann man unter folgenden Adressen im Netz lesen:
http://antigomopa.net/de/
http://gomopaabzocker.wordpress.com/
http://www.nepper-schlepper-bauernfaenger.com
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qNpzAu-QMuE
http://www.korte.de/alexander/2006/01/gomopa-finanforum-kritik.html
http://evelux.de/gomopa-sam-240/
http://blog.deobald.org/archive/2007/07/01/betrugsvorwurf-gomopa-spam/
2. Dubai
KLP Group Emirates – Vereinigte Arabische Emiraten. Als Chef der Firma gilt HerrMartin Kraeter, der nicht nur als „Gehirn” des ganzen Unternehmens, sondern auch als langjähriger Freund des Herrn Klaus Maurischat (GOMOPA-Leiter) fungiert.
Diese Firma will nicht einmal verbergen und gibt offiziell zu, dass sie als strategischer Partner des GOMOPA auf dem Gebiet des Nahen Ostens, dem entsprechend das Gebiet der Persischen Küste tätig ist.
Die offizielle Tätigkeit der Firma KLP Group Emirates umfasst unter anderem folgende Bereiche: Finanzberatung auch aus dem Off-Shore Bereich (Management Services – Facilitators – OffshoreConsultants, International Tax & Legal Consultants – Fiduciaries). Im Tätigkeitsbereich der Firma kommt auch die Gründung von Firmen und Unternehmen in den so genannten „Steuerparadiesen” vor, um der Steuerpflicht zu entfliehen.
Die inoffizielle Tätigkeit der Firma KLP Group Emirates umfasst unter anderem die Zusammenarbeit mit dem Service GOMOPA im Bereich der „Geldwäsche”. Die Gelder werden infolge der kriminellen Handlungen durch GOMOPA generiert, durch vorgeschobene Berufs- und Justizpersonen demnächst über die ganze Welt verbreitet und legalisiert.
Die auf die Gesetzwidrigkeit beruhende Tätigkeit der Firma KLP Group Emirates sowie die Kooperation mit dem Services GOMOPA erregten Aufmerksamkeit auch bei den Verfolgungsorganen des Vereinigten Königreiches Großbritannien, vor allem bei Scotland Yard, das zu dieser Frage ein intensives Ermittlungsverfahren eingeleitet hat, welches sich in der „Entwicklungsphase“ befindet. Es muss angemerkt werden, dass alle Berufs- und Justizpersonen, vor allem aber die Kunden der Firma KLP Group Emirates, die mit der Firma KLP Group Emirates in Vergangenheit zusammengearbeitet haben und dies immer noch tun, unter die „Luppe“ des Scotland Yard genommen werden.
3. Russland
a) Die Firma E-xecutive wird von dem Herrn Vilen Novosartow geleitet. Die auf der Homepage der Firma enthaltenen Informationen kommen direkt von der FirmaGOMOPA. Die Firma E-xecutive führt die enge Zusammenarbeit nicht nur mitGOMOPA, sondern auch mit einer weiteren auf dem russischen Gebiet unter dem Namen OOO VK Broker funktionierenden Firma. Die Firma E-xecutive im Zusammenhang mit der Firma OOO VK Broker ist Mitglied einer kriminellen Gruppe unter der Leitung von GOMOPA. Die Firma E-xecutive vertritt Interessen von GOMOPA in Russland und in Mittel- und Osteuropa.
Inoffiziell beschäftigt sich die Firma E-xecutive insbesondere mit der Suche nach potenziellen „Opfern” des Erschwindelns, der Erpressung und Erzwingung der Gelder für GOMOPA von Firmen und Korporationen aus dem Gebieten Russland, Ukraine, sowie aus allen Staaten in Mittel-Osteuropa.
Offiziell führt die Firma E-xecutive eine dem Forum GOMOPA ähnliche Gewerbetätigkeit.
b) OOO «VK Broker». Leiter der Firma ist der Herr Pavel Kokarev. Diese Firma verheimlicht es nicht, dass sie mit dem Forum GOMOPA zusammenarbeitet. Die FirmaOOO VK Broker vertritt GOMOPA in Mittel-Osteuropa, auch in Russland. Sie übt offiziell auf diesem Gebiet dem GOMOPA ähnliche Tätigkeit aus, inoffiziell aber ist sie mit der Suche nach potenziellen „Opfern“ der Erpressung, des Betrugs und des Erschwindelns für GOMOPA beschäftigt. Die Firma blieb bis jetzt von jeder Strafe verschont, konnte mit „ewiger Straflosigkeit” wegen eines schlecht ausgearbeiteten, korrupten Rechtswesens in Russland rechnen. Die Situation kann sich jedoch ändern, nachdem Herr Klaus Maurischat in Berlin festgenommen und verhaftet worden ist. Dieser ständige Straftäter, der „auf seinem Konto” eine Reihe von rechtskräftigen Urteilen hat, der bis jetzt seine Freiheit unbegrenzt genossen hat, dementsprechend nicht weiß, was es bedeutet verhaftet zu werden, beginnt nach und nach laut uns zur Verfügung stehenden Angaben endlich „sein Zeugnis abzulegen“. Dies ist verständlich, wenn man die ihm drohende hohe Strafe berücksichtigt. Dieser Delinquent zeigt dabei immer größeres Interesse an der Zusammenarbeit mit den deutschen Verfolgungs- und Ermittlungsorganen. Es besteht also die Chance, dass er weitere Personen der Öffentlichkeit enthüllt, indem er auf Minderung der Gefängnisstrafe rechnet. Es ist auch nur die Frage der Zeit, wann INTERPOL in Zusammenarbeit mit der Russischen (FSB) der Firma OOO VK Broker „an die Tür klopft”, welche durch den Herrn Pavl Kokarev geführt und vertreten wird.
Die Firma OOO VK Broker besitzt ein virtuelles Buero im REGUS-Gebäude in Moskau, stellt nicht einmal eine Person an und bildet eine typische Ein-Person-Firma, die alle geschäftlichen „Delikte“ firmieren kann, wobei sie keine zivil-rechtliche Haftung trägt. Der Herr Pavel Kokarev scheint „vergessen zu haben” oder besitzt kein ausreichendes Wissen für seine eventuelle Verantwortung fier die Teilnahme an den internationalen Verbrechen unter Leitung von GOMOPA.

DER “SPIEGEL” ÜBER STASI-OBERST STELZER UND “GoMoPa”s JOCHEN RESCH

http://www.spiegel.de/spiegel/print/d-65717414.html

DIE OPFERLISTE DER STASI “GoMoPa” umfast über 4.000 Personen u.a. Familie Knobloch

Charlotte Knobloch (geborene Neuland; * 29. Oktober 1932 in München) ist seit 1985 Präsidentin der Israelitischen Kultusgemeinde München und Oberbayern, seit 2003 Vizepräsidentin des Europäischen Jüdischen Kongresses (EJC), seit 2005 Vizepräsidentin des Jüdischen Weltkongresses (WJC). Vom 7. Juni 2006 bis zum 28. November 2010 war sie Präsidentin des Zentralrats der Juden in Deutschland. Vorher war sie seit 1997 dessen Vizepräsidentin. Charlotte Knobloch ist Schirmherrin desErnst Ludwig Ehrlich Studienwerks für jüdische Begabtenförderung.

Bernd Knobloch (* 20. November 1951 in München) ist ein deutscher Manager.

Knobloch ist der Sohn von Samuel und Charlotte Knobloch. Er graduierte 1977 an Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität und legte 1978 das Zweite Staatsexamen ab. Nach seiner Zeit als geschäftsführender Partner der Allgemeinen Bauträgergesellschaft mbH – Cederbaum und Partner KG, wurde er 1992 in den Vorstand der Frankfurter Hypothekenbank berufen und 2004 Vorstandsvorsitzender der fusionierten Eurohypo, wo er für den Ausbau vom klassischen Kreditinstitut zur internationalen Immobilien- und Finanzbank verantwortlich zeichnete.Seit 2006 gehört er auch dem Vorstand der Commerzbank AG an. Im September 2008 schied er auf eigenen Wunsch aus dem Vorstand der Eurohypo aus, ebenso schied er aus dem Vorstand der Commerzbank AG aus. Seit dem 17. November 2008 sitzt er im Aufsichtsrat der Hypo Real Estate.[ Knobloch ist Präsident der Vereinigung der Freunde und Förderer der Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität und Mitglied im Vorstand der Hertie-Stiftung.

Mehr über die Opfer hier:

http://www.victims-opfer.com/?page_id=15672

Zitat:

Liebe Leser,

über 4.000 Menschen und Firmen wurden und werden von STASI-”GoMoPa” gestalkt und erpresst.

Dies hat zu einem – so erste Schätzungen von Schadensexperten – Schaden von über € 1 Milliarde geführt, nimmt man als Berechnungsgrundlage

die im Falle von Meridian Capital geforderte Erpressungssumme.

Der immaterielle Schäden durch zerstörte menschliche Leben und Schicksale, dieser “Dämonen im Internet” (Eigenbezeichnung von Ober-Stalker “Klaus Maurischat”) ist noch viel höher und nur mit dem von der DDR-Gestapo angerichteten Schaden vergleichbar, deren Nachfolgeorganisation die fingierten “Goldman, Morgenstern u. Partner” – “GoMoPa” zweifelsohne sind.

Darunter sind auch etliche Todesfälle und viele Personen und Firmen, die nicht auf der 3.400 Fälle umfassenden “Warnliste”, besser Stalking, Betrugs- und Erpresserliste auftauchen.

Hinzu kommen zahlreiche Fälle von Börsenmanipulation wie im Falle “Wirecard” mit Pennystocks aus der US-Corporation-Schmiede von “GoMoPa”-Partner  “Graf” “Dr.” Stenbock.

Organisierte Kriminalität im ganz grossen Stil.

DIE “GoMoPa”-Opferliste 2010 – getarnt als “Warnliste” von den erfundenen “Goldman, Morgenstern u. Partnern” erstellt

Folgende Firmen und Personen wurden u.a. von Peter Ehlers (wenn er denn so heisst) und “GoMoPa”, dem STASI-”NACHICHTENDIENST” seit Jahresanfang 2010– ohne jeden Beweis – verunglimpft, um daraus Profit für Ihren postkommunistischen Saftladen zu schlagen:

GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
2
 Anton
 Abdul Sheikh
 Abraham
 Akcay
 Aksoy
 Aktürk
 Alexandre
 Alsguth
 Arnold
 Arnol Arslan
 Artschwager
 A & G Insurance Corporation
A & O Finanz- und Immobilenvertriebsservice GmbH
A+B Finanz
A+K Fina
 AA Capital
 ABAG BETEI
 Abbey House Acquisitions
 ABC Finanzdienst
 Accent-Finanz GmbH
 ACCENTA IMMOBILIEN MANAGEMENT AG
 ACI Alternative Capital Invest GmbH
 Acoreus Collection Service
 Acorn Consulting
 Activ 3000 GmbH
 Activa GmbH
 Activa Wirtschaftsberatung GmbH
 Actiwa Vermittlung von Finanz- und Vorsorgekonzepten e.K.
 Adeshieman Company
 Aditus Fonds GbR
 Admus AG
 Adolph & Komorsky International GmbH
 Advance Invest AG
 ADVANCE INVEST AG S.A.
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
3
 Advanced Group Kuwait
 Advanced Program Trading AG
 Advin Consult Finanzierungsvermittlungs GmbH
 Advisa Consulting GmbH
 Aeternus Energy Corp
 AFG AMERICAN FINANCIAL GROUP INC.
 Agentur Herold
 Agentur Leif Schurig
 AGR Allgemeine Gewerbedatei e.K.
 Ahorn Trust AG
 AIF Bank & Trust Company
 AJPA Broker SA
 Akeman Capital
 AKJ Allgemeine Leasing AG
 AKJ Privatfinanz AG
 AKJ-Firmengruppe
 AKK Dienstleistungs GmbH
 Aktienpower AG
 AktienPowerMarketing GmbH
 Akzenta AG
 Albion Investment Management
 Alexander Freiherr von Pillnitz & Berenberg Treuhandgesellschaft 1908 Limited
 Allgemeine Giro 24 GmbH
 ALLGEMEINE IMMOBILIEN-BÖRSE GmbH
 ALMO Hausbau GmbH
 Alpha Finanzsanierungs GmbH
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
4
 Alpha Oil Inc.
 Alphapool AG
 Alpina Finanz GmbH
 Alternative Capital Invest
 ALV Auto-Leasing und Vermietungs GmbH
 Alvino Group
 AMBROS/VBS
 American Investment & Finance Corporation
 AMK Akustikbau GmbH
 AMK Immobilienbetreuung GmbH
 Anderson & Goldberg S. L.
 Anderson McCormack Group S.L
 Anderton Stoner&Partner
 Anglo African Minerals plc
 Ango-Käufer-Service GmbH & Co. KG
 Antassia GmbH
 Anthony & Carter
 Apex Investments Corporation
 Apex Trading Group
 Applied Cash International
 APT Advanced Program Trading AG
 Aquaorbis AG
 ARCADIA Finanz- & Wirtschaftsberatung
 Arena GmbH
 Argos Finanz GmbH
 Ario AG
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
5
 Armaco
 Art Bauträger u. Immobilienhandelsgesellschaft mbH
 Artemis Financial
 AS Bau Berlin
 ASC AG für Satellitenkommunikation
 ASCANIA Vermögensverwaltung
 Ascor Media Ltd.
 ASG GmbH
 Assecura-Assecuranz Vermittlungs GmbH
 Associated Management Group
 Associated Management Group (AMG Zurich)
 Aston Rowe Consulting Advisory
 Atlantis Exploration AG
 Atlantis-Genossenschaft
 Au Vi Product GmbH
 Aufina Holding
 Aurora Gold Corp.
 Australian Lottery
 Autosafe Parkhaus AG
 Autotester 24
 AVAG Allgemeine Vermögensverwaltung AG
 AVAG-Funds
 AVD AG
 AVM AG
 AvW Invest AG
 AXXIOM AG
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
6
 Azalenia Basel AG
 Amaxopoulus
 Arntzen
 Aniol
 Altmann, Dr.
 Assenmacher
 Appel
 Aulenbach
 Aengenheister
 Amonath
 Asmus
 Almer
 Anlauf
 Aniol
 Blon von
 Barney
 Bajcar
 Bronischewski
 Butler
 Becker
 Berger
 Burat
 Buettner
 Behring
 Baumert
 Becker
 Bünning
 Bok
 Bahcecioglu
 Bahceli
 Balicioglu
 Balogh
 Barteczko
 Becker
 Bergenthal
 Bindokat
 Böhrer
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
7
 Born
 Bortstein
 Busch
 Böhm
 Braun
 Blum
 B u. S Technologie GmbH
 Bachmann Roth Advisory
 Badenia Bausparkasse
 Bagleys Investment Company
 Baltica Savings & Investment Cop.
 Bank Leumi AG
 Bankgesellschaft Berlin
 Banque Bruxelles Lambert (BBL)
 Barlow & Ramsey
 Barringer and Co.
 Basel Institutional
 Basic Trading Solution Ltd.
 Bau- und Grund Immobilien GmbH
 Bauconsult Gesell. für Haus- u. Grundbesitz
 Baucontrol GmbH
 Baufinanzierungszentrum Berlin – Karlshorst
 BAV-Konzept Versicherungsmakler GmbH
 Bavaria Invest Finanzmanagement
 Bavaria Trading Company
 Baye Invest
 BÖRSENPOWER Coaching und Verwaltungsges.m.b.H.
 BBAP Assekuranzmakler & Finanzdienstleistungs GmbH
 BeFa Invest GbmH & Co KG
 BelSwissBank
 BEMA Investitions- und Beteiligungsgesellschaft GmbH
 Benedict Lifeline GmbH
 BENEDICT Star GmbH
 Benitex AG
 Benson & Raymond Acquisition
 Berger Daniel
 Bergues Invest SA
 Bestgambling.Com
 BESTLIFESELECT AG
 BF Bayerische Baufinanz GmbH
 BFS Neckarsulm
 BFTS AG Schweiz
 BHG Baugenossenschaft Hockenheim e.G
 BIK Bauträger
 Biotech Development
 Bishop & Parkes Advisory
 Blanc & Baumar
 Blinder International
 BLISTER YACHTING GMBH
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
8
 Bloomfield Consulting AG
 Bond and Future Group Ltd.
 Bonetti & Wilmers
 Bonus Bauträgergesellschaft mbH
 Borsa Financial Inc.
 BR Consultance Alfaz S.L.
 Branchenklick
 Branko Financial Service
 BRAZIL-INVEST-VC LTDA
 RDS-Dienstleistungen
 Breadley Steigenberger & Partner (BSP)
 BREBA Invest S.L.
 Brentana Wohnbau GmbH
 Brett Commodities GmbH
 Bright Capital Banker Ltd
 Britannia Swiss Equities – BSE AG
 Brodowski Dach- und Fassadenbau GmbH
 Brodowski und Deyna Immobilien GmbH
 Brokers Society Sociedad de Gesti? Tramitaci Financier
 Brown & Lampe U.S. Portfolio Management Ltd.
 BSD GmbH
 Bullion Trading Group
 Bund der Verbraucher (BDV)
 Burbach Consulting GmbH
 Business Partner Credit GmbH
 Brauer
 Bogatz
 Birner
 Bastert
 Baeuerle
 Bertges
 Barteczko
 Bertges
 Beyer
 Bogatz
 Bender
 Bens
 Bösebeck
 Bouderi
 Baan
 Bender
 Birkins
 BECK
 Barthel
 Beyreuther
 Banghard
 Bohrmann
 Bauer
 Bludau
 Bajcar
 Bernhart
 Belkenheid
 Barthel
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
9
 Baumbach
 Barde
 Casula
 Carsten
 Celik
 Cengiz
 Clemann
 Cura
 Cuti
 Cuti
 Campa
 C & P Mutual
 C. Gewerbeimmobilien
 Callux Forderungsmanagement
 Calvin & Sanderson Associates
 Cambridge Asset Management AG
 Cameron Poe & Associates Inc.
 CAP-NETWORK AG
 Capital Securities International
 Capitalinform Limited SA
 Capitalinform Limited SA
 Car Leasing Agency Ltd.
 Carsten Haus GmbH
 Carver Brooks & Associates Ltd.
 Cash Group AG
 Cash-Immobilien GmbH
 Cashselect
 CasMaker Ltd.
 Castor Capital
 Cater & Sattler OHG
 Caviar Creator Inc
 CB Freie Versicherungsmakler GmbH
 CBC
 CDH AG
 Census Grund GmbH & Co KG
 Centracon
 Centracon Investment AG
 Centro Euro Service AG
 Centro Euro Service AG
 Centro-Service GmbH
 Ceptum AG
 Ceres Warenhandels- und Beratungsgesellschaft mbH
 Certus Consulting
 CH Devisen Macht SA
 CHEAPLY SMOKING CLUB
 Chiemgauer Vermögensverwaltung
 Chips Virtual Casino
 CIC Insurance Company SA
 Cinerenta Gesellschaft für Internationale Filmproduktion mbH
 Cis Deutschland AG
 City Hyp Finanzierungsvermittlung
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
10
 City Zins Finanzierungsvermittlungs AG
 CL Inkasso AG
 CL Inkasso AG
 Clean Lease GmbH
 CLEAN PATENT GMBH
 Club Alanzo VIP Cruises
 CMP Global Consulting Ltd
 CMX Capital Markets Exchange AG
 CNP Casino
 Colebrooke Management Holdings
 Color für Kinder e.V.
 Comitas Agentur VSV
 Commercial Development Bank
 Commercial First Trading Corporation
 Complete Commodity Trading
 Comroad AG
 ComTex Vermögens- und Verwaltungs GmbH
 OMVAL Capital AG
 Concorde International – Business Consultants
 Condor Gold and Minerals Inc.
 Conductis GmbH
 Conik Invest
 Coninvest Finanz AG
 Conradi & Hilger Gbr mbH
 Consens Gesellschaft für Projektentwicklung u. Vermittlung von Immobilien
 Consolidated Capital Management Limited (CCML)
 Content Services Ltd.
 Contracta Grundstücksmanagement GmbH
 Convent Consulting GmbH
 CONVERGEX CARIBBEAN, LTD.
 Conzeptfinance Ltd.
 Cooperativa Extranjero de Credito y Investiamento SA
 Cornhill Management S.L.
 Cosena Management S.L.
 CP Medien AG
 CPTD – Central Patent & Trademark Database
 CR Consulting GmbH
 Credit for you Limited
 Credit Mirabaud
 Creditnet Bank Internationale
 CS Capital Service GmbH
 CST Umwelttechnik und Innovation e.G.
 Cumulus Gesellschaft für Immobilien- Investitionen mbH
 Cura Investitions- und Beteiligungsgesellschaft
 Cmok
 Cordes
 Chuen
 Drabnitzke
Dana
Dogs
Doll
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
11
Doujak
Dziuba
Dorsch
Becker
DAK Finanz
Danaro Invest
Asset Management
DAT Finance AG
DBVI AG
De Lotto Switzerland
Delmont Wealth Management
Deltoton AG
DEM Marketing
Demirok GmbH Bauunternehmen
Densch & Schmidt GmbH
Der Informant GmbH
Deutsche Contracting GmbH
Deutsche Immobilien Grundvermögen Holding AG
Deutsche Mentor für Finanzen (DMFF) e.K.
Deutsche Mentor für Finanzen AG
Deutschen Anlage- und Beteiligungs Aktiengesellschaft (Dabag)
Develop Management GmbH
Deyna Immobilien GmbH
DHB-Dreiländer-Handels und Beteiligungsgesellschaft Walter Fink KG
Die Agentur
Die Tradergemeinschaft – Best of Marketing SARL
Dierig Unternehmensberatung
DIHA Dienstleistungs – und Handel GmbH
DIP AG
DIREKTE VERMÖGENSBERATUNGSGESELLSCHAFT MBH
Direkter Anlegerschutz e.K.
Distefora Holding AG
Dividium Capital Ltd
DLF-Immobilienportfolio-Walter-Fink KG
DM Beteiligungen AG
DMI Derivatives Management Inc.
DMP-Gruppe
DMV – Deutsche Markenverlängerungs GmbH
Dohmen-Invest
Domizil Immobilien Leasing GmbH
Domusfinanz
Dow Win Financial Group Corporation
DPMV-Deutsche Patent- und Markenverlängerung GmbH
Dr. Antonio GAMPA
Dr. Bassam Bouderi
Dr. Cornelius Gregorius Consulting Inc
Dr. Gerbig Treuhand GmbH
Dr. Görlich Grundbesitzbeteiligungs GmbH
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
12
Dr. Hanne Grundstücks GmbH
Dr. Hartmannsdorf Immobilien GmbH
Dr. Mayer & Cie. GmbH
Dr. Peters
Dr. Schmitt Inc.
Dr. Werner Financial Service AG
Dragon Partners Inc.
Dreiländerfonds DLF
Dreiländerfonds DLF-94/17
Drexel Management GmbH
Dubai International Investment & Trading
Dubai-1000-Hotel-Fonds
Duesenberg Financial Group Inc.
Dunas de Corralejo S.L.
Dupont Conseille AG
Dux Partners AG
Dörflinger
Dallüge
Deutsch
Dittel
Dierkes
Deubelbeiss
Dallinger
Drewitz
Eichhorn
Erber
Elbert
Ebner
Eroglu
Eschinger
Ettelt
Evcil
E-Money Power (EMPFX)
E.U.R.O.- Unternehmens- & Wirtschaftsberatungs- Ltd.
EAG AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT für WIRTSCHAFT
Earnshaw Advisory Services
Earthsearch Communications Inc.
Easy Concept Hamburg KG ( E@sy )
EBC AG
EBCON – Europäische Verbraucherberatung
Ebcon Europäische Verbraucherberatung AG
Ecco
Economy Capital Corporation
Ecotrend Holding AG
ECP Euro Caribbean Properties Ltd.
ECTO GmbH
Ecumoney Limited
Edgar Heumann GmbH
EECH AG
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
13
EEIG – Europäische Wirtschaftskammer
Effekten- und Edelmetallberatungs GmbH
Effinance Private Equity AG
EKC
Elbe Emissionshaus
Elefant Immobilien GmbH
EM.TV AG
EMA Event Management Agentur GmbH
Embdena
Emmerson Bennett
Empresa Minera (Bergbau) AG
Enexoma AG
Equinox Private Consultants Ltd.
ERGO-Plan
Erich Holderer Finanzdiestleistungen
ESKATA Finanz- Immobilien- Handels GmbH
ESTEKAR LIMITED
Estreel GmbH & Co.KG
EuMedien
Eurefi Eurefi Holding AG
Euregio Immobilien L&F B.V.
EURENTA Gesellschaft für Anlagen-, Renten- und Sparkonzeptionen GmbH
EURENTA Gesellschaft für Marketing- und Promotion GmbH
Euring GmbH
EURO CREDIT UNION
EURO Finanz Consult AG
Euro Finanz Management
Euro Kapital AG
Euro Real Investment Company
Euro Trading GmbH
Euro-American Beteiligungsvermittlungsg. MbH
EURO-CONSULT e.K.
Euro-Pool AG
EUROCAPITAL BANK INC.
Eurocapital Investment Corporation
EURODOM Berlin GmbH
Eurogoldtrader
Eurokapital AG
Eurolink Consult GmbH
European Estates&Investment AG
European Kings Club
European Trade marks and Designs
European Trademark Organisation S.A.
Europäische Schuldenregulierungs- und Ausgleichsanstalt
Europäische Wirtschaftskammer für Handel, Gewerbe und Industrie
EUROTRADE & CONSULTING AG
Eurotrust Capital Management
EV&K
Evantus Invest
EVD Direktverkaufs AG
EWR Wirtschaftsdatenregister
Exakt Martkanalysen Research GmbH
Exeltrade
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
14
Engels
Eder
Esser
Elas
Ehrenberg
Eilts
Eich
Eich
Eder
Engler
EISENBERG
 Felgner
Flug
Feyh
Freke
Florian
Fasan
Fritsch
Freiherr von Fink
Fink
Ferrera Dr. F & P Aktiengesellschaft & Co. KG
F.I.P. GmbH
F.V.F
FA. Haustein Finanzvermittlung
Fafa Capital
Faktor 1 GmbH
Falcon Euro Trading Limited
Falcon Oil Group
Falk Capital AG
Falk-Gruppe
Falken Depot Management GmbH
Falken GmbH
Falken Vermögensverwaltung GmbH
FALLON BANCROFT HOLDING
Fashionact Industries Inc.
Noske
FB Bauträger GmbH
FDMV FINANZDIENSTLEISTUNGEN
FFB Dörflinger GmbH
FFCC Verwaltungs GmbH & Co. Finanzdienstleistungs KG
FG Finanz-Service AG
FGP & Cie
Fibeg Finanzberatung- und Vermögensverwaltungs GmbH
Fibu AG
Fideles & Associates AG
Fidelity International
FIDU payment services S.A.
Finama Vermögensverwaltungs KG
Finance Concept GmbH
Finance Service International
Financial Consulting
Financial Consulting UK Limited
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
15
Financial Planning Systems Ltd.
Financieros Panama – Societaet Rodriguez Batista Diaz
Finanz Score GbR
Finanz Service Hennig
Finanzprogramme Bentley & Partner
FINANZtest Center
Finanzvermittlung Fritz Guth
Finanzvermittlung und Wirtschaftsdienst Ott GmbH
Finbrands Global Limited
Fine Trading Group Finvest Asset Management
FIPTR Federated Institute for Patent- &
Trademark Registry First Canadian Joint Venture
& Consulting Inc. First Canadian Joint Venture
& Consulting Inc. (Canada)
First China Corporate Management Group
First Garant Fund AG First Intercontinental
Bancorp. Ltd. First Invest Grundbesitz
GmbH First Invest Swiss Trade
First Real Estate Grundbesitz GmbH
First Saxonia Trading Ltd
Flash Finance Floris Bank
FOCUS Immobilien und Projektbau GmbH
FOKUS INVEST AG Foma Internationale
Inkassogesellschaft mbH
Fondax Capital Trust GmbH & Co. KG
Fondshaus Hamburg FORBIS Corporation
Force Worldwide Investments Corp
Foreign Exchange Clearing House Ltd.
Forest Finance Service GmbH
Forex4free Forexone-Broker
Forst Finance AG Four Stars AG
Frankonia Sachwert AG FRD International
Free Finance -Service Futura Finanz AG
Futura-Concept GmbH FXTSwiss
Fridez Fridez
Frau Floßbach
Fritz Franko
Frerichs Fink
Fridez Fasan
Filsinger
Freiherr von Lepel
Frydenlund Foetzsch
Fridez Fridez
Fitz
Grüters
Geyer
Gonnes
Grüner
Gerlach
Gast
Gräbedünkel
Gustav

GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
16
Güttig
Gläßer
Gehle
Gerome
GOLDEN-BALLARIN
Golsch
Gronemeyer
Görlich
Götzl
Gaber
Graupner
Guth
G+M Baubetreuung GmbH
G.V.V. bR.
G.W.F. Grundwert-Bauträger G.M.B.H
Gaiacor International PLC
Galant Immobilien GmbH
Garant Kreditvermittlung
Garant-Hundsdorff-Istanbul
GEBAB
Gebrüder Schmidtlein GbR
GEcoS Holding AG
Geldfinder GmbH
Gemas GmbH
Genius Insurance Service GmbH
Genius Investments – Genius Funds
Geoteck Inc.
Gerd Esser Grundbesitz GmbH
GerGermania Grundbesitz AG
Germania Venture Capital AG
Gesellschaft für Erbenermittlung
Gesellschaft für Exklusive Veranstaltungen Dortmund mbH
Gesellschaft für Finanz- u. Wirtschaftsdienstleistungen (FiWi)
Gesellschaft zur Datensicherung im Internet (GSDI)
Gesellschaft zur Vermittlung kapitalorientierter Finanzanlagen GmbH (GVFK)
GetAssisted Group
GfS Invest GmbH
GGHF Windpark Sitten GmbH & Co. KG
GHS Unternehmensgruppe
GIP Grundstücks-Immobilien & Projektmanagement GmbH
GIV Gesellschaft für Immobilien und Vermögensverwaltung mbH
Glatt & Partner GmbH
GLOBAL – BAU Immobilien GmbH
Global AWS AG
Global Capital Group
Global Cogenix Industrial Corp.
Global Financial Invest AG
Global Foreign Exchange (Switzerland) AG
GLOBAL LIFESTYLE GROUP S.A.
Global Mineral Resources Corp.
Global Pension Plan
Globaltraiding.com Kapitalmanagement
Globalus (Immobilien) Gmbh & Co. KG
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
17
GM Capital Partners
GMF Finanz AG
GMF Treuhandgesellschaft mbH
GO AHEAD SERVICE LTD
GOJ AG
Gold-Barren-Silber.com
Gold-Versandhandel
Goldstein & Partner Inc.
GOT Thimm GmbH
GPS GmGrand Capital Ltd
Great Berlin Wheel GmbH & Co. KG
Grevenreuth AG
Grund und Boden Beteiligungs AG
Grundstücksgemeinschaft Arslan
Grupo Esdinero
Grünewälder GmbH
GSM Gesellschaft für Professionelles Sachwert Management AG
GSM Gesellsc
GTO Gap Trading Online
Gulf Oil Exploration Inc.
GVW – Wirtschaftsclub
GWG Gesellschaft für Wirtschaftsplanung mbH
Göttinger Gruppe
Göttler Finanz AG
Graf
Guillaume
Gropper
Göker
Grotelaers
Günzel
Gelbke
Haugg
Halbey
Händel
Hansen
Heise
Hensel
Hipp
Hirner
Hirth
Heider
Hickl
Hansel
Hauser
Härtel
Heckler
Hambusch Prof.
Herold
Hering Dr.
Herr Budzinski
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
18
Heyer
Hering Dr.
Hartung
Hesselmann
Hettrich
Heiner
Händel
Heinrich
Hartl
Hansch
Hartung
Hepp
Heinekken van
Hanne
Heiliger
Heumann
Hensley-Piroth
Haffa
Holderer
Helfer
Heckmann
Hormann
Hennig
Hermsmeier
Hornberger
Halabi
Herr Gieselmann
Hundsdorff
Hanisch
Hornig
Hambusch Prof.
H.R.L. International
H2O Swiss AG
Hafenstein Marketing GmbH
Hamburg Connection
Hamilton Associates A.G.
Handelshaus Schaar
Handelskontor Fischer
Hansa Treuhand
Hanse Capital
Hanse Club
Hanseatische AG
Hanseatische Senatorenkanzlei
Hansefina GmbH
Hartl Immobilien
Hartl Immobilienmanagement GmbH
Harz Börde Finanz
Haus- und Vermögensverwaltung GmbH (HaVeWa)
Hauser Treuhand Rorschach HTR
Haushaltsfuchs
HB Capital Partners
HBW-Finanz AG
HCI Capital
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
19
HDL Hausdienstleistungsgesellschaft mbH
Helvag AG
Helvetia Treuhand GmbH
Helvetia Treuhand-Union GmbH
Hentsch & Müller S.A.
Hermes Beteiligungs AG
Hermes Portfolio Management GmbH
Bens
HKA-Bank 1954 Ltd.
HNH Finanzberatung-Treuhand GmbH
Horn Wolfgang Dr.
HouseFX AG
HTB Holding
HuHWH International AG
Hypo – Leasing B.V.
Heinen
Hagen
Hoff
Hensel
Hampe
Hauser Metzler
Harksen
Huber
Hartung
Hübner
Hönnscheidt
Hettrich
Hering Dr.
Hettrich
Hübner
Ihl
Izmirlioglu
Izmirlioglu
Immega
I-investorclub Ltd.
I.B.F.T.P.R. International Bureau for Federated Trademark Patent Register
I.B.I.P. International Bureau for Intellectual Property
I.F.I. Ltd. Milincic
IAZ & Partners
IBB GmbH
IBB INTERNATIONAL
IBEKA Immobilienbeteiligung AG
IBH Limited
ICB – Intercontinental Brokerage Corporation
ICM Basel
IContent GmbH
Idee Immo Concept GmbH
Idilei-Treuinvest
IFF AG Zukunftsunternehmen für Investment, Fonds, Finanzen
IFIC Integra Financial Consulting GmbH
IFS International Financial Services Inc.
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
20
IHB Immobilien Heinen & Biege GmbH
IKF
Immorenta Immobilienbeteiligungsgesellschaft mbH
Imperia Invest IBC
Indara Projekt AG
Indices International Group IIG
Info-ZentralInformations-Service-Center (ISC)
Inkasso Team Moskau / TMA GmbH
Innoflex
Innovatio Allfinanz & Franchise System AG
INT Elektrizitätswerk Beteiligungs KG
Integral Finanz AG
Integral Treuhand Vermögensverwaltung GmbH
Integro Capital Partners
Intellectual Property Agency Ltd.
Inter Alpen AG
Inter Capital Bank
Inter Capital Bank Ltd.
Inter Credit Group
Interbank Asset Management Group AG / InterBank AG
Intercontinental Financial Developments Plc.
Interessensgemeinschaft Barbara Merkens
Interfinance Investment & Credits
Interglob AG
INTERMEX International Ltd.
International Bioremediation Services Inc.
International Insurance Holding Inc.
International Invest Ltd
International Travel Services Ltd.
Internet Media AG
Internetwebshop
Inventaire Pro
Inveractivos
InvestInvestor Relations Corp.
Inveteratus Asset Management
IOPTS International Organization for Patent & Trademark Service Corporation
IPS AG – Internationale Produktvermarktungs Systeme
ISR Management & Consulting Ltd
ISS Immobilien Schutz und Service AG (ISS AG)
ISS Immobilienschutz und Service AG
ITL-Enterprises Inc.
Immega
Ibekwe
Just
Jochum
Jester
Junges
Jaeger Research GmbH
Jefferies Associates Group
Jejkal AG Strategische Investments
Johnsons Banking Group
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
21
Johnsons Banking Group
Joseph Cooke Ltd.
Julius Brown AG
Jump
Jachnicki
Jaufmann
Jansson
Jonas
Jedlitschka
Junghänel
Junghänel
Junghänel
Juratsch
Jentzer
Jilg
Jung
Karabunar
Kriewald
Knobloch
Kinner
Käner
Kontze
Kratz
Kostas
Körner
Keffel – Fallahi
Kaiser
Klein
Klaas
Krenzer
Kletsch
Kappes
Kloiber
Kiehl
Kappes
KlaffenböcKraushaar
Kleefisch
Krefft
Klaffenböck
Kaltofen
Kühnen
K & S -Frisia
K&K. B. P. Vermögensverwaltung
K1 Group
K1-Group
Kaikatsu Group
Kanzlei Knil
Kanzlei Range & Partner
Kapital-Consult GmbH
Karriere AG
Köllner-Unternehmensgruppe
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
22
König & Cie
KCP Bank
Kingside Establishment
Kirkland Lee
KK ImmobilienFonds I AG & Co. KG a.A.
Kleeblatt4U
Koch & Eilts GmbH & Co. KG
Koh-I-Noor
Konnex ImmoInvest GmbH
Konsumgüter Direktvertrieb e.V
Kredit einfach Vermittlungs GmbH
Krug Immobilien GmbH
KSF Korrespondenz-Service für Finanzsysteme
KSK International Ltd.
KubKusch und Partner GmbH
Kutag Capital Partners AG
Kutag Group
Kuwait Finance & Investment Company
KVG Internationale Kapitalvermittlung
KVV-Profi Management- und Beteiligung AG
KWD-Marketing
Kühne Bauspar- und Finanzierungsfachbüro
Küng & Partner Vermögensverwaltung AG
Klaffenböck
Klostermann
Keiner
Klappenbach
Klappenbach
Kastler
Kuzmanovic
Kraus
Keil
Kulecki
Kahnhäuser
Klein
Kuhlee
Karabunar
K.
Knobloch
Kiok
Klinge
Koehn
Kuhlen
Lebinger
Lorenz
Luft
Lampe
Leonhard
LehnoLohmann
Lohmann
Lee
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
23
Leindecker
Lökkevik
Lucky Prices S.L.
Lepel Freiherr von
Lemke
Linder
Littig
Langanke
Limburg
Laubach
Lins
Lüthi
LAM Immobilien- und Beteiligungs AG
Landesbank Berlin – LBB/IBV Fonds
Landmark Invest Ltd.
Lange Vermögensberatung GmbH
Lange Vermögensberatung GmbH
Langenbahn AG
LBB-Fonds
LDG Capital Markets Company Limited
Lenz Immobilienhandel AG
Life
Lifetime Products Inc.
Liquid Asset Management Inc.
Lisser Consulting
Litz United GmbH & Co. KG
Locat – Projektsteuerung GmbH
Locstein Asset Management AG
Logotype Klostermann, Lässig
London Hong Kong Exchange plc
LPA Financial Services
LSC. Ltd.
Ltd. Ifi
LVA Garant Fund Inc.
Lichtenfels
Lenz
Leuze
Lengdorfer
Lutz
Marien
Möbius
Müller
Müller
Mohm
Morgenstern
Markof
Müller Dr.
Mathy
Müller
Miersch
Matten
24
Moulatsiotis
MichalMatthiesen
Milincic
Matthies
Merkens
Marx
Meyer
Madden Group Inc.
Magnus GmbH&CO KG
MALAYSIA Credit
Malaysiacredit Van Bergen Corp.
Mallorca Trading
Malmsbury, Harrington and Seaford
Maonara AG
Marine Shuttle AS
Marine Shuttle Operations Inc.
Mark Marketing S.R.O.
Matic-Verlagsgesellschaft mbH
Matterhorn International
Mayer und Cie GmbH
MC Management Consulting & Financial Services
MCC Mariaux Chevre & Cie
McKenzie-Boyle Associates
Med-Synergy Mallorca GmbH & Co. KG
Media Concepte
Media Inkassomanagement AG
Media-Com LTD & Co. KG
Medivest
MEG AG
Mercaforex – Silver Holdings International Ltd.
Mercantus AG
Mercury Forex Investments Assets Ltd.
Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd
METROPOL LEASING GMBH
MFIVE Ltd.
MFS 24
MG Beteiligungs AG
MICONA LTD.
MidAtlantic Holdings plc
Minera Real del Barqueno S.A.
Mitschka Alternative Advisory
MJS Developments S.A.
MK Service & Vertrieb
MK- Service & Vertrieb
MMC Medialog Marketing Company
MMCIS Investments
Mobilica.de
MOLY-FLON LIMITED
Money and Capital ASS.
Money Plus Worldwide Financial Limited
MonMach Marine Insurance Company Ltd.
Morgan Franklin Investment Inc.
MPC Capital
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
25
MPC Capital AG
Mueller Capital Management (MCM)
Multi Advisor Fund I GbR
MWB Vermögensverwaltungs AG
Mehler
MÖLLER-BÜCKINS
Montag
Morris
Manns
Meyer
Mundt
MILLS
McGregor
Müller
 Nicolic
Noske
Neumann
Naumann
Nieder
Noske
Nitsche
Natea Financial Transactions Division
Nationales Markenregister AG
Natur- und Erlebniswelt Schmölln GmbH
NEO TECH PUBLISHING COMPANY INC.
Net Mobile AG
Netsolutions FZE
NEUBERT & PARTNER FINANZMANAGEMENT GMBH
Neuburg Financial AG
Neue Medien GmbH
New Century Capital
NEW Naturpark und Erlebniswelt Schmölln
New World Financial
Newton Forest
Noble Advisory Group
Nodorf und Partner
Non plus ultra Marketing GmbH
Nord Finanz KG
Nord-Analyse/Jürgen Harksen
Nordcapital
Norddeutsche Vermögensverwaltung
North Am GmbH
NOVI BETEILIGUNGS GMBH
NUEVO GMBH
NWK Consulting
NYTS New York Trading Services Ltd.
Nünlist
Noack
 Ohles
Ohlmann
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
26
Obermann
Ohlenschläger
Ottersbach
O Online Casino
OBA OBJEKTPLANUNGS UND BAUGESELLSCHAFT MBH
Obtime GmbH
Ocean s Continental AG
EKOFINANZ PIPER & FISCHER (ÖKOFINANZ)
Offshore Shuttle AS
Olaf Tank – Rechtsanwalt
OLF OBERLAUSITZER FACTORING UND LEASING GMBH
OMNIKRON VERWALTUNGSGESELLSCHAFT MBH
Soldwisch
Optimal-Unternehmensgruppe
Opus one Corporation
Organi Juris GmbH
ORGANIJURIS HOLDING AG
Ost Com Holding AG
Ownership Emissionshaus
Ommer
Oberle
Olek
 Petrenko
Prehn
Piroth
Pelz
Pfeiffer
Piroth
Pirkel
Pirkel
Petsch
Pröckel
Pirkel
Pilling
Pirkel
Paco Integrated Energy Inc.
Pacon Capital S.A.
Pacta Invest GmbH
PACTA-INVEST GmbH
Partner Air Limited
Partner-Computer-Group Ltd.
PayPay Inc.
PayPay S.a.r.l.
PCG
Pentafox Höhn OHG
Pepper United S.R.O.
Perfect4u
Pharma Kontor AG
Phillip Alexander Securities & Futures Ltd.
Phoenix Kapitaldienst GmbH
Phönix Aktiengesellschaft
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
27
Phönix Finanzsanierungs AG
Platinum Group International
Platonja GmbH
Plim Cooperation AG
PLUS CONCEPT GMBH
Plus Finanz Consulting GmbH
Postbank Finanzberatung AG
PPV Produkt-Promotion-Vertrieb
Pradofin
Premium Capital
Premium Firmenservice GmbH
Prime Core AG
Prime Gold Invest AG
Prime Select AG
Primus Consulting Optionshandel GmbH
Prinz zu Hohenlohe Jagstberg & Banghard GmbH
Private Commercial Office (PCO)
Private Equity Capital Group
Private Equity Invest AG
Private Fiduciary Trust GmbH
Private Investment Brokers and Financial Fonds Inc.
PRIZMA F.A. CENTER
Profi Moderne Wohnungsbaugenossenschaft
Profit.sawas.info
Projekta GmbH
Projostar GmbH
Prokon Kapital GmbH
Protectas Vermögensberatung GmbH
Protected International Inc.
PS-Leasing
Piroth
Petry
 Quinz
QES – Die Geldarchitekten
Quantum Asset Management
Quatro Group
QUEEN GMBH
Quinz Jürgen
Quorum AG
 Riesen van
Reegen
Riviera
Rose
Reinke
Ruppert
Rautenberg
Rüdenauer
Rist
Röll
Rohde
Runyeon
Rieß de Sanchez
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
28
Rachensperger
Ramin
Rohde
Range
Reich
Rummelt
Runyeon
Reimers
Rohbeck
R&S GmbH
R.A.P. Vermögensanlagen-Aktiengesellschaft & Co. KG Immobilienverwaltung
Racingkasino.Com
Rainbow Real Estate Ltd.
Ralph Hübner Verlag
Ranston Ltd
Ranston Ltd.
Ravena Finanz Management AG
RDV GmbH
Real Estate AG
Rechtsanwalt Asmus
Register of Commerce – Markenregisterverzeichnis
Renko & Associates
Renta / Löwer
Rentmeister KG
Res Justitia GmbH
Residencia GmbH
Rheinisch Westfälische Grundbesitz AG
Richmond & Palmer Investments Inc
Riverblue GmbH
RK-invest intern. Ltd.
RKI Invest
RKV Finanzservice
Robyns Capital GmbH
Robyns Vermögensverwaltung GmbH
Rodman & Shaw Ltd.
Rontax-Treuhand
Rosiak Dr.
Ruhrstrom GmbH
Ruluso Holding Ltd.
Rushton Limited
Ruspa Capital AG
Ruyan Europe
Richter
Reime
Richtsteig
Rademann
Rippel
 Sälinger
Schwarz
Stefan
Storm
Seuchter
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
29
Seumenicht
Schaefer
Scholl
Siegert
Schuhmann
Scharl
STRÖMBERG
Stanley
Splisteser
Sablowski
Schwarz
Stumpf
Scholz
Steigenberger
Schmidt
Seebacher
Sümper
Steuten
Schwartz
Simon
Schrämli
Spilker
Spanier
Seci
Stolte
Stolte
Schmid
Schmid
Schroeder
Seidel
Schmidtlein
Stangl
Steinbach
Stecker
Szulc
Schäfer
Spilker
Scholl
Stadelmaier
Shadi
Schäfer
Schmidt
Schaul
Sulser -Eggenberger
Schwarz
Sch.
S.
Schroeder Dr.
Schierloh
Sinn
Soldwisch
Smith
Schmidt
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
30
Schrenk
Schieweck
Schmidt
S.
Schmid
S&K Deutsche Sachwert AG
S.B.E. Bank
S.B.E. Financial SA
S.L.I.C.E AG
Sachsen Planke GmbH
Sachsenpark AG
Safe Inrest Quota Obtain Ltd (auch bekannt unter SIQO)
Sagro
Sakura Financial Group
SAM FINANZ AG – Swiss Asset Management
San West Inc.
Sauer & Söhne
Saxonia Sparkasse Inc.
SBAG – Schweizerische Börsenabwicklungsgesellschaft mbH
Schmid Immobilien Ltd.
Schmiedendorf Arzneimittelvertrieb AG
Schuhbecks am Platzl GmbH
Schutzvereinigung der Versicherten, Sparer und Kapitalanleger e. V.
Schwabenland Büro
Schweizer Kapital AG
SCT Bank Ltd.
SD Global Equity AG & Co. KG
Seabed Invest AG
SEB Bank AG
Sebeka GmbH
Secured Communications Limited
Securenta AG
Securities Regulatory and Investment Board (SRIB)
Senior Invest
Servicebüro Natter
SFP Private Banking
SFR AG (Swiss Finance Research AG)
Sherwood Henderson Limited
Shibby & Partners
Sigma Leasing Ltd.
Sigma Trading Limited
Signature Equities Agency GmbH
Signum Edelsteine GmbH
Sisko System Haus AG
Skyline Advisory Group
Solatera Energy AG
Sole Invest GmbH
Solventa Finanzservice GmbH
Sophisticated Investor Inc.
SP Trade Investment Capital Ltd. / SP Trader Fund
Sparkasse Dortmund
Spree Finanz AG
Spree-Capital GmbH
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
31
Star Invest
Stebo GmbH
Steinberg Investment Research AG
Steinberg Investments Ltd.
Stephens Capital Markets Limited
Sterling Asset Management AG
STIFX (stifxonline.com)
Stifxonline.com
Stonehard Consulting d.o.o.
Stratton & Partner
Stratton Wainwright
Suisse Banking
Suisse Life Securities
Sunset Handelsgesellschaft Unternehmergesellschaft
SVK Marketing GmbH
SVM24Direkt
SWAG – Schweizerische Wertpapierabrechnungsgesellschaft AG
SWD Sächsischer Wirtschaftsdienst
Swiss Agricole Asset Management
Swiss Basis GmbH
Swiss Bellair Bank
Swiss Credit Trust AG
SWISS DIVISION
Swiss Finance Conceptions & Marketing AG
SWISS Finance Consult
Swiss Finance Consult AG
Swiss Finance Consult AG
Swiss Finance Research AG
Swiss Key Equity Consult AG
Swiss Lotto – Gesellschaft Schweizer Zahlenlotto
Swiss Lotto Agency
Swiss Lotto Highstakes
Swiss Marketing GmbH
Swiss Siam Investment Club
Swiss Trading
Swiss World Cyber Lottery International – Swiss Lottery
Swiss-American Capital Management Institute,Inc.
SwissAudit Aktiengesellschaft
SwissKap AG
Swisskontor GmbH
Swissridge International Corp.
Switzerland Investment Group
Süddeutsche Stabak AG
Süddeutsche Stabak Aktiengesellschaft AG
Südwestbank AG
System Vorsorge Kapitalvermittlung (SVK)
Schmuck
Simon
Schlag
Sonntag
Schellscheidt
Schildbach
Schmidt
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
32
Surowiec
 Tzolov
Tannenbaum
Thomson
Tucholke
Traxel
Teller
Trisl
TOBER
Tausch
Trice
Thimm
Turgut
Tank
T.K. Immobilien GmbH
Taipan
Talis Enterprise GmbH
Task Force Service GmbH
Taurus GmbH
TBC-Marketing AG
Telba GmbH
Tele Inside s.r.o.
Tellba GMBH
The Crown Group CH
The Vale Group / Vale Group InvestmentsVale Group Asset Management /
Thomas Moore
Titan
Titan Trading Group
TiViBo GmbH
Tortola Capital
Trade Direct GmbH
Transatlantic Business & Management Ltd.
TRC Telemedia e.K.
Treberhilfe Berlin gGmbH
Treff Hotel Beteiligung
Trend Capital AG
Treu-Control Wirtschaftsberatungs- und Treuhandgesellschaft mbH
Treulux AG
Tri-Hub International
Triagon Holding AG
Trias Erste KG
Trias Zweite KG
Trikom Consulting GmbH
Trinity Ventures
TSI Consulting
TSI-Consulting
Turner Mayfield Advisory A.G.
TVI Express
Two For 1 Sportsbook
TXL Business Academy GmbH
TXL Capital Management GmbH
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
33
Tang
Täubert
 Ullmann
Uhlendorff
UBS Deutschland AG
UFB VERMITTLUNGSGESELLSCHAFT MBH
UFP
UGV Inkasso
Ulrich Engler Daytrading
Ulrich Petry
ULRICH VERLAG KG
ULRICH- VERLAG KG
Unabhängige Wirtschaftskanzlei Wolfgang Gelbke
Unia Holding AG
Unia Industrie Holding AG
Unispar Banque PLC
United Invest Management Deutschland Ltd & Co. KG
United Investors
United Markets (Asia) Limited
United Network Industries (Uni AG)
United Re-Insurance Group
United Trust Bank Plc.
United Trust of Switzerland S.A
United Trust of Switzerland S.A.
Unitymedia Hessen GmbH & Co KG
Universal Settlements International (USI) Inc.
Univest Limited
Univesta
Univesta Björk Immobilien und Anlage GmbH & Co.
Unternehmensgruppe Esdinero
UOT Financial Services Limited
US GOLD INTERNATIONAL LTD.
US Securities Agency (USSA)
Usecom Software AG
 Volkmann
Völl
Vitor
Voß
van Dien
van Dyken
Voll
von Eugen
Varin
Varin
Vejpustek
Volk
Vogel
von Krauthahn
V-O-B Handelsgesellschaft mbH
V/F Operation Leasing GmbH
VABA AG
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
34
ValueMaker
VALUTA VERMÖGENSVERWALTUNG GMBH
VanFunds / Vandior Inc.
Vanilla
VCI
Ventana Biotech Inc.
Ventono Capital GmbH
Venture Associates
Verbraucherdienst.e.V
Verimount FZE
Versicherungsdienst
Vertex Commodities
Verum Placement Ltd.
Vierte Juragent GmbH & Co. Prozesskostenfonds KG
VIT EnvironmentSystems AG
Vitascanning AG
Viva Tenerife Services
Volkssolidarität Sozial-Immobilien GmbH
Volkssolidarität Sozialimmobilienfonds GmbH & Co. KG
 Wood
Wächter
Wintzler
Willer
Wiedenbauer
Walkemeyer
Weimer
Walkemeyer
Wolter
Wolter
Wagner
W.
Wagner
Wolfram
Wolfram
Werner Dr.
Wagner
Wulff
Wagner
Weislogel
Walker
Wagner
WABAG – Wirtschaftsanalyse und Beratung AG
Wagner Finanzvermittlung GmbH
Wahl + Partner GmbH
Warrick Management Group Ltd.
Waterman Associates
WBwso Ltd
Wconstrukt
Wealth and Asset Planning
Webtains GmbH
Weizman Associates
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
35
Weizman Associates LLC
Wellshire Securities GmbH
West Atlantic Credit Group
WESTGATE Financial AG
Westminster Financial Management Ltd
Weyhill Establishments
WFB sro
White Birds Germany GmbH
Whitherspoon, Seymour & Robinson Corp.
Who is Who Prominentenenzyklopädie AG
WIBAG Immobilien und Beteiligung Aktiengesellschaft
Wicon Wirtschafts- und Finanzkontor Betz & Kronacher Beteiligungsgesellschaft
WIETEC-Germany
WIG – Wirtschaftszentrale für Industrie und Gewerbe AG
WIHH – Wirtschaftsinstitut für Industrie, Handel, Handwerk AG
WILL GMBH FINANZBERATUNG & VERWALTUNG
William Smith Partners
Wilton Investment Group
WiRe AG
Wirtschafts- und Finanzberatung Lindow-Giebel
Wirtschaftskanzlei Jilg GmbH
Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft Contor GmbH
WNB Finanzanlagen AG
Wohnbaufinanz
Wohnungsbaugesellschaft Leipzig West AG
Wohnungsbaugesellschaft Leipzig-West AG
Wonsei AG
Woodbridge Business Corp.
World Capital Group
World Capital Holding Corporation
WORLD MEDIA FONDS
World Telecom Data
WorldClearing Holding Inc.
Worldexchange
WorldFX-club
WSR – Whitherspoon, Seymour & Robinson Corporation
Würzburger Aktiengesellschaft für Vermögensbeteiligungen und Verwaltung (WAG)
 X Com Ltd.
Ximex Executive Ltd
XYZ NOMINEES LTD
 Y2M Media Limited
YESILADA BANK LTD.
Young Media Spain S.L.
Yuca Park
 Ziedd
Zeitler
Zürbis
Zimmermann
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
Zimmermann
Zürbis
Zietlow
Zürbis
Zollweg
Zürbis
Zensen-Döring
Z.E.N.I.T. AG
ZAK Inkasso
Zapf Creation
ZBI Zentral Boden Immobilien AG
ZDR-Datenregister GmbH
ZeBo GmbH
ZECH & ZECH VERMÖGENSVERWALTUNG GMBH
Zeder Immobilien Treuhand AG
ZEDER INVESTMENT AG
Zenith Commodities Ltd
ZENKER WOHNBAU AG
Zentrum für Wirtschaftspraxis
Zinnwald Financiers
Zucomex The Zurich Commodities Exchange
Zurich Capital Gruppe
Zurich Direct

Opfer in 2011:

– Angela Merkel

– Wolfgang Schäuble

– Accessio AG

– Allianz Global Investors

– Antek International

– Andreas Decker

– Anna Schwertner

– Bank of America

– Barclays

– Bernd Müller

– Bernd Pulch

– Beluga

– Bliznet Group Inc.

– Centrum Immobilien

– Citigroup

– Coldwell Banker

– Commerzbank

– CPA Capital Partners

– Credit Suisse

– CSA

– CWI

– Debiselect

– D.E.U.S.eG – Jürgen Oswald

– Deutsche Bank

– Deutsche Anstalt für Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht

– DKB Bank

– Dr. Paul Jensen

– Ekrem Redzepagic

– Erste Mai GmbH

– Express Kurier Europa

– Financial Services Regulatory Authority of Frankfurt

– FRONTAL 21

– Garbe

– General Global Media

– Genfer Kreditanstalt

– HCI

– HSBC

– HypoLeasing

– Indara

– JPMorgan Chase

– Kreis Sparkasse Tübingen

– Leipziger Bauträger (etliche Firmen, hier subsummiert)

– Lloyds Bank

– Lothar Berresheim

– Martina Oeder

– Martin Sachs

– Meridian Capital

– Money Pay

– Norinchukin Bank

– Oak Tree

– Prime Estate

– Prosperia Mephisto 1 GmbH & Co KG

– Raiffeisen- und Volksbanken

– Rothmann & Cie.

– Stefan Schramm

– Teldafax

– TipTalk.com

– Wirecard

Natürlich alles OHNE IRGENDEINEN BEWEIS VON VORBESTRAFTEN SERIENBETRÜGERN AUF EINER HOMEPAGE MIT KEINER ECHTEN PERSON IM IMPRESSUM STATTDESSEN MIT EINER NEW YORKER BRIEFKASTENADRESSE IM AUFTRAG MUTMASSLICH VON RA JOCHEN RESCH UND RA MANFRED RESCH, PETER EHLERS UND GERD BENNEWIRTZ -UND UNTER MITARBEIT VON GOOGLE, DEUTSCHLAND,

ALS “FRONTMANN” VON “GOMOPA” AGIERT DER DUTZENDWEISE VORBESTRAFTE KLAUS MAURISCHAT UNTER ANDEREM WEGEN BETRUGES AN SEINEM EIGENEN ANLEGER

Das Urteil gegen„GoMoPa“-Maurischat: Betrug am eigenen Anleger wg € 10.000,-

110401 6 GoMoPa SJB Opferlisteh
Die Verurteilung von Klaus Maurischat und Mark Vornkahl wegen Betruges am eigenen Anleger Klaus Maurischat und Mark Vornkahl, Betreiber vonwww.gomopa.net: Am 24. April 2006 war die Verhandlung am Amtsgericht Krefeld in der Betrugssache: Mark Vornkahl / Klaus Maurischat ./. Dehnfeld. Aktenzeichen: 28 Ls 85/05 Klaus MaurischatLange Straße 3827313 Dörverden.Das in diesem Verfahren ausschließlich diese Betrugsache verhandelt wurde, ist das Urteil gegen Klaus Maurischat recht mäßig ausgefallen.Zusammenfassung der Verhandlung vom 24.04.2006 vor dem Schöffengericht des AG Krefeld in der Sache gegen Klaus Maurischat und Mark Vornkahl.Zur Hauptverhandlung erschienen:Richter Dr. Meister, 2 Schöffen,Staatsanwalt, Angeklagter Klaus Maurischat, vertr. durch RA Meier, Berlin; aus der U-Haft zur Verhandlung überführt.1. Eine Gerichtsvollzieherin stellt unter Ausschuss der Öffentlichkeit eine Urkunde an den Angeklagten Maurischat zu.2. Bei Mark Vornkahl wurde im Gerichtssaal eineTaschenpfändung vorgenommen.Beginn der HauptverhandlungDie Beklagten verzichten auf eine Einlassung zu Beginn.Nach Befragung des Zeugen Denfeld zum Sachverhalt wurde dieVerhandlung auf Wunsch der Staatsanwaltschaft und den Verteidigern unterbrochen.Der Angeklagte Maurischat gab nach Fortsetzung derHauptverhandlung Folgendes zu Protokoll:Er sähe ein, dass das Geld auf das falsche Konto gegangen sei und nicht dem eigentlichen Verwendungszweck zugeführt wurde. Das Geld sei aber zurückgezahlt worden und er distanziere sich ausdrücklich von einem Betrug.Schließung der BeweisaufnahmeDer Staatsanwalt verließt sein PlädoyerEr halte am Vorwurf des Betruges fest. Mit Hinweis auf die einschlägigen Vorstrafen des Angekl. Maurischatund auf laufende Ermittlungsverfahren, beantrage er ein Strafmaß von 1 Jahr und 6 Monaten.Er halte dem Angeklagten zu Gute, dass dieserWiedergutmachung geleistet habe, und dass dieser geständig war. Zudem läge die letzte Verurteilung wegen Betruges 11 Jahre zurück. Auch sei der Geschädigte nicht in existentielle Not geraten, wobei der Staatsanwalt nicht über noch laufende Verfahren hinweg sehen könne. Er läge aber dem Angeklagten Maurischat nahe, keine weiteren Aktivitäten im Bezirk der Staatsanwaltschaft Krefeld auszuüben, insbesondere möchte er, dass keine weiteren Anleger im Bezirk der Staatsanwaltschaft Krefeld durch GoMoPa akquiriert werden.Die Freiheitsstrafe soll zur Bewährung ausgesetzt werden.Plädoyer des Verteidigers des Angekl. Maurischat, Herrn RA MeierEr schließe sich, wie (in der Unterbrechung) vereinbart, dem Staatsanwalt an.Es stimme, dass sein Mandant Fehler in seiner Vergangenheit gemacht habe, und dass er auch diesmal einen Fehler begangen haben könnte, jedoch sei der Hinweis wichtig, dass sein Mandant aus diesen Fehlern gelernt habe.Der Angeklagte haben das letzte Wort.Maurischat sagt, es sei bereits alles gesagt worden.Unterbrechung zu Hauptverhandlung. Der Richter zieht sich mit den Schöffen zur Beratung zurück.Urteilsverkündung:Der Angeklagte wird des gemeinschaftlichen Betrugs für schuldig befunden.Der Angeklagte Klaus Maurischat wird zu einerFreiheitsstrafe von 1 Jahr und 6 Monaten verurteilt. Diese wird zur Bewährung ausgesetzt.Die Bewährungszeit wird auf 3 Jahre festgesetzt.Der Haftbefehl gegen Klaus Maurischat wird aufgehoben.Der Angeklagte trage die Kosten des Verfahrens.UrteilsbegründungDer Richter erklärt, dass eine Täuschung des Geschädigtenvorliegt und somit keine Untreue in Betracht kommen kann.Die Fragen, ob es sich um einen Anlagebetrug handele sei irrelevant. Er hält den Angeklagten die geleistete Wiedergutmachung zu Gute.Ebenso ist das Geständnis für die Angeklagten zu werten. Zudem liegt die letzte Verurteilung des Angeklagten Maurischat 11 Jahre zurück.Die Parteien verzichten auf Rechtsmittel. Das Urteil ist somit rechtskräftig.Mit dem heutigen Urteil endet ein Kapitel in derBetrugssache Goldman Morgenstern & Partners, Klaus Maurischat und Mark Vornkahl.Alle GoMoPa.net Verantwortlichen, Maurischat, Vornkahl und Henneberg sind nun vorbestrafte Abzocker und Betrüger und die Zukunft der Pseudoklitsche GoMoPa.net sieht duster aus.Mir dem Geständnis der beiden ABZOCKER MAURISCHAT UND VORNKAHL vor Gericht bricht ein jahrelangaufrechterhaltenes Lügengeflecht von einigen primitiven Betrügern zusammen. Gewohnheitsverbrecher und Denunzianten,die rechtschaffene Personen und Firmen in ihren Verbrecherforen kriminalisierten.

DAS HANDELSBLATT ÜBER DIE VERBRECHEN DER FINGIERTEN “GOMoPa”

http://www.handelsblatt.com/finanzen/boerse-maerkte/boerse-inside/finanzaufsicht-untersucht-kursachterbahn-bei-wirecard/3406252.html

Gastbeitrag: WIE Sie GoMoPa-Rufmordopfer werden können

Liebe Leserin, lieber Leser!

Stellen Sie sich bitte kurz vor, dass Sie mit einer tollen Geschäftsidee oder einer Geschäftserweiterung zu mehr Geld kommen möchten. Beispielsweise auch Ihr Unternehmen vergrössern oder gar Ihre Waren exportieren wollen.

Sie werben damit natürlich über die Medien….

Da meldet sich bei Ihnen möglicherweise ein Beauftragter des Finanz-Nachrichtendienstes GoMoPa mit der Mitteilung, dass im GoMoPa-Forum sehr negative Forenbeiträge über Ihre Person oder Ihr Vorhaben stünden. Äusserst Schlimmes wir über Sie berichtet. Zum Beispiel, dass Sie bisher schon Ihr Geld mit betrügerischen Machenschaften verdient hätten oder Ihr Sohn als erfolgreicher Sportler nach neuesten Ermittlungen in einem Kokain-Dealer-Ring verwickelt sei.

Ein anonymer User ( Schreiberling) habe dies geschrieben, wird vom GoMoPa-Beauftragten berichtet. Man könne jetzt noch nicht feststellen, ob dies so wahr sei. Man könne aber auch nicht den Beitrag einfach rausnehmen, denn es könne ja auch was Wahres daran sein!

Falls Sie selbst an der Wahrheitsfindung interessiert seien, könnten Sie auch beim ´seriösen Nachrichtendienst` GoMoPa als Gesellschafter oder als Premium-Mitglied einsteigen, dann könne man ja…..usf. …ganz einfach den Beitrag herausnehmen!

So ähnlich könnte es geschehen und glauben Sie mir: ´Dies ist kein böser Traum,-keine Fata Morgana`, sondern schon Zigtausendmal in der fast 10-Jährigen GoMoPa- Geschichte so abgelaufen.

Wir, von der CSA-Agency, wurden selbst aus Wettbewerbsgründen seit 2002 von GoMoPa auf primitivste Weise im Forum diffamiert oder die von uns als seriöse Dienstleister empfohlenen Unternehmungen wurden per Rufmord mit schmutzigsten, unwahren Verleumdungs-Attacken von anonymen Bloggern ( bezahlte Helfershelfer vom GoMoPa) nahezu ruiniert. Nicht nur finanziell , sondern auch gesundheitlich nieder gemacht! Nicht umsonst heisst es RUFMORD.

Der Begriff ´Stalking` ist da noch eine vornehme Bezeichnung.

Auf gut deutsch passt Rufmord besser.

Geschäftlicher und gesundheitlicher RUFMORD gehört auch entsprechend bestraft.

Die Justiz tut sich sehr schwer damit. Vor allem, wenn die Rufmörder mit Ihren Machenschaften mit Gesellschaften wie z.B. ´GoMoPa` als Briefkastenfirma aus dem Ausland agieren. UND zum anderen, weil sich die Stalking-Terror-Experten von GoMoPa sich mit ihren Methoden auch der Justiz und der Medien bedienen.

Die seriöse Alternative zu systematischem Rufmord

Seriöse Aufklärung hilft!Auch der zuweilen personell überforderten Justiz kann mit entsprechender Aufklärung zum Hintergrund der Go-Mafia ´GoMoPa` und ihrem Paten Klaus Maurischat geholfen werden!

Bitte, Freunde der Gerechtigkeit, helft mit, dem grausigen ´GoMoPa-Rufmord-Terror ein baldiges Ende zu bereiten!

Unterstützt die ´BAG-Illus, den BUND anonyme Gerechtigkeit`

Schaut Euch die Rufmord-Methoden der GoMoPa-Mafia mit ihrem Paten Klaus Maurischat an. Hier zur BAG-Website www.123bagillus.com

Hier zu den aktuell aufgeführten Rufmord-Beispielen http://tinyurl.com/6h5zttc

Hier der Link zum BAG-Blog http://123bagillus.wordpress.com/

Ihr CSA-Agency-Aufklärer Martin Sachs

( Seit 2002,- dem GoMoPa-Terror-Beginn rufmordgeschädigt, in der Existenz nahezu vernichtet, siehe Beispiel oben / ständig mit dem Tode per Mailattacken bedroht, unter anderer Identität lebend…)

csa-partner-as@safe-mail.net

Der “freiwillige” Beratungsvertrag zwischen “GoMoPa” und estavis

Der “freiwillige” Beratungsvertrag zwischen “GoMoPa” und estavis

Die wichtigste Finanzierungsquelle von “GoMoPa” war laut der Teilhaberinformation auch eine Bauträgergesellschaft, gegen die Anwalt Resch im Auftrag von Anlegern vorgegangen war. Deren Muttergesellschaft Estavis schloss einen “freiwilligen Beratervertrag” mit “GoMoPa” – das ist das Strickmuster der Resch-”GoMoPa”-Vorgehensweise…

Schon eigenartig. Da hat Gomopa eine eigene GmbH in Berlin – eine 100 % Tochter der Goldman, Morgenstern & Partners LLC – schliesst aber Verträge mit Erfüllungsort Deutschland mit dem Gerichtsstand New York. Die GmbH bestand bereits zum Zeitpunkt des Vertragsabschlusses.

GoMoPa GmbH, Berlin(Unter den Linden 21, 10117 Berlin). Firma: GoMoPa GmbH Sitz / Zweigniederlassung: Berlin Gegenstand: Die wirtschaftliche Beratung, insbesondere des Mittelstandes, in der europäischen Gemeinschaft unter der Wortmarke GoMoPa. Dazu gehören die Präsentation von Firmen im Internet und anderen Medien, Vermietung von Werbeflächen auch im Internet, die Vermittlung von Handels- und Wirtschaftskontakten und Werbung auch über das Internet sowie das Bereitstellen von Informationen und Portalen im Internet. Stamm- bzw. Grundkapital: 50.000,00 EUR Vertretungsregelung: Ist ein Geschäftsführer bestellt, so vertritt er die Gesellschaft allein. Sind mehrere Geschäftsführer bestellt, wird die Gesellschaft gemeinschaftlich durch zwei Geschäftsführer oder durch einen Geschäftsführer in Gemeinschaft mit einem Prokuristen vertreten. Alleinvertretungsbefugnis kann erteilt werden. Geschäftsführer:; 1. Reski, Peter, *23.12.1952, Verden/Aller; mit der Befugnis die Gesellschaft allein zu vertreten mit der Befugnis Rechtsgeschäfte mit sich selbst oder als Vertreter Dritter abzuschließen Rechtsform: Gesellschaft mit beschränkter Haftung.

========================================================

BERATUNGSVERTRAG

Zwischen der
ESTAVIS AG
Uhlandstrasse 165
D-10719 Berlln
– im folgenden ESTAVIS genannt –
Und

Goldman, Morgenstern & Partners LLC.
575 Madison Avenue, 10th floor
New York, NY 10022-2511
USA
– im folgenden GoMoPa genannt –

I. AUFTRAG UND DURCHFÜHRUNG

1.1 ESTAVIS beauftragt GoMoPa mit der Erarbeitung elnes neuartigen Vertrlebskonzeptes für den Abverkauf Denkmalgeschützter
Immoblilien an eine entsprechende Klientel, die unter zur Hilfenahme des lnternets und unter Einhaltung verbraucherrechtlicher Auflagen geworben werden soll.
1.2. Dazu gehören: Vorschläge zur Herstetlung von Internetseiten und entsprechender Werbung, Kostenberatung, Überwachung
und Einholung entsprechender Angebote, Personalsuche, Verhandlungen mit affilablen Anbietern, Vermittlung von Consutern.
1.3 Die Durchführung erfolgt in enger und ständiger Abstimmung mit einem Vertreter des Vorstands der ESTAVIS AG, sowie
rechtlichen und steuerlichen Beratern der ESTAVIS. GoMoPa wird diesbezüglich entsprechende Vorschläge erarbeiten, die detalllierte und
schriftliche und mündliche Empfehlungen auf Basis der von ESTAVIS angestrebten Zlele beinhalten.
1.4 Weitere Beratungsleistungen GoMoPa’s bezlehen slch nicht auf Rechts- oder Steuerberatung, haben aber Unterhändler
Gespräche sowie die Vermittlung entsprechender Consulter zum Inhalt, jedoch ohne rechtsverbindliche Vollmacht.

2. HONORAR
2.1 Für die Erbringung der genannten Leistunqen zahlt die ESTAVIS an GOMOPA ein Honorar In Höhe von 75.000.- € (Fünfundsiebzigtausend Euro). Das Honorar lst fällig wie folqt:
2.2. Bis zum 21.08.2009 eine Abschlagszahlung In Höhe von 50.000.- Euro. Anschliessend jeweils zum Ende eines Monats (beginnend mit dem August) 5 Teilbeträge in Höhe von jeweils 5.000,- Euro gezahlt. Zahlungen erfolgen gegen Rechnunqsstellung.
2.3. Leistungen, dle eventuell darüber hlnaus zu erbringen sind (eventuelte Reisekosten, Spesen, zusätzliche Aufgaben und
Arbeiten) werden separat und ausschliesslich nach Absprache in Rechnung gestellt und von ESTAVIS gezahlt.

3. SCHLUSSBESTIMMUNGEN

3.1 Sind oder werden einzelne Bestimmungen dieser Vereinbarung unwirksam, so bleibt die Gültigkeit der Vereinbarung im
Übriqen unberührt. Ungültige Bestimmungen sind einvernehmlich durch solche zu ersetzen, die unter Berücksichtigung der Interessenlage den gewünschten wirtschaftlichen Zweck zu erreichen geeignet sind. Entsprechendes gilt für die Ausfüllung von
Lücken, die sich In dieser Verelnbarung etwa herausstellen könnten.
3.2 Aenderungen und Ergänzungen dieser Vereinbarung bedürfen zu ihrer Rechtswirksamkeit der Schriftform. Das Gleiche gilt für
ehe Abbedingung dieser Schriftformklausel.
3.3 Erfülllungsort und ausschliesslicher Gerichtsstand ist New York.

Berlln den, New York den, 13.08.20O9

ESTAVIS AG Goldman Morgenstern & Partners llc
Mozanovski F. Lanz Klaus Maurischat

DIE FINANCIAL TIMES DEUTSCHLAND ÜBER DIE FINGIERTE “GoMoPa”

ftd logo SJB GoMoPa Presse Lounge

Financial Times Deutschland schreibt über Gomopa

_____________________________________

In der Druckversion der FTD erschien am 28.12.2010 dieser Artikel.

Gomopa-Wonach der Markt lechzt

Der Finanznachrichtendienst Gomopa will künftig ein Seriositätsrating von Anbietern am grauen Kapitalmarkt veröffentlichen –dabei ist das Unternehmen selbst umstritten

Bei Beteiligungsmodellen haben Anleger die Qual der Wahl: Sind die tollen Prognosen von Anbieter A glaubwürdig? Oder wäre vielleicht B mit den bodenständigeren Erwartungen vertrauenswürdiger? Es gibt zwar jede Menge Ratings und Siegel, wirklich hilfreich sind viele aber nicht.

Man müsse hinter 95 Prozent der Ratings Gefälligkeitsgutachten vermuten, meint gar Klaus Maurischat, Chef des Finanzinformationsdienstes Goldman Morgenstern & Partners (Gomopa) aus New York, in einem Schreiben an Premiumnutzer seines Dienstes. Schmückende und verkaufsfördernde Ratings oder andere Bewertungen würden von denUnternehmungen bezahlt oder gesponsert, erläutert er. Das führe zu Interessenkonflikten.

Gomopa bereite daher ein Angebot vor, „nach dem der Markt förmlich lechzt“: ein Seriositätsrating, das den Markt revolutionieren und auch noch „mindestens sichere 20% jährliche Rendite an die Gründungsmitglieder“ abwerfen soll. Das System bewerte neutral und unbeeinflussbar „mathematisch, nach festen Algorithmen und Parametern die Seriosität einesUnternehmens und des dahinterstehenden Unternehmers“.

Daraus ergebe sich tabellarisch ein Ranking nach dem Ampelsystem. Das Rating münde in einer Zahl zwischen 100 und 10 000. Sie zeige die Wahrscheinlichkeit eines positiven Geschäftsausgangs mit dem zu bewertenden Anbieter an. Bei 9067 würden zum Beispiel zu 90,67 Prozent „die Aussagen des Anbieters erfüllt werden“.

Beim Rating zählten in erster Linie nachweisbare Leistungen in der Vergangenheit, erläutert Maurischat. Meldungen und Nachrichten würden berücksichtigt und die Werthaltigkeit geprüft. Bei Fondsinhalten sei das nicht nötig. „Die komplizierten Abhandlungen versteht im Endeffekt der eigentliche Verbraucher sowieso nicht“, findet der Gomopa-Chef. Das Rating seimit anerkannten Systemen und Datenbanken wie der Schufa und Google vernetzt. Änderten sich Parameter dort, schlage sich sofort das Ergebnis und Ranking bei Gomopa nieder.

Das wirft allerdings jede Menge Fragen auf. Wie wird etwa die Werthaltigkeit von Informationen bei Google mit einem solchen Ansatz erfasst? Wie geht das System mit neuen Anbietern um oder mit bislang als seriös bekannten Anbietern, die ein offensichtlich schlechtes Produkt auflegen? Maurischat antwortete auf Anfrage, er werde nichts zu internen Geschäftsabläufen mitteilen.

Unter dem Namen Gomopa-Rating soll das Angebot allerdings nicht an den Start gehen, schreibt Maurischat den Nutzern, sondern über eine US-Tochter. Das wiederum ist sehr gut nachvollziehbar. Denn über Goldmann Morgenstern &

Partners selbst gab es in der Vergangenheit auch ziemlich negative Meldungen und Nachrichten. Im Herbst wurde zum Beispiel bekannt, dass sich die Staatsanwaltschaft München für Maurischat und einen Gomopa-Kollegen interessiert, weil der Dienst im Frühjahr falsche Informationen zum TecDAX-Unternehmen Wirecard veröffentlicht hatte und der Aktienkurs abgestürzt war. Bei Gomopa selbst fiele der Seriositätsindex damit wohl nicht so vorteilhaft aus.

siehe

http://www.victims-opfer.com/?page_id=11764

DIE GESAMTE DEUTSCHE PRESSE VERACHTET UND VERABSCHEUT DIE FINGIERTEN “GoMoPa”

Presseberichterstatung-zu-Maurischat1

DIE PRESSE ÜBER DIE FINGIERTEN SERIENBETRÜGER DER STASI “GOMoPa”

http://www.victims-opfer.com/?page_id=11764

Neue mörderische Erpressungsmail von STASI “GoMoPa” – Lösche uns oder Stirb

Liebe Leser,

nachfolgend eine neue Erpressermail der mörderischen Rufmörder der fingierten “Goldman, Morgenstern und Partner ” alias “GoMoPa”:

Stasi Wappen DW Ver 437941p3 300x199 Weitere Erpressung des vorbestraften Serienbetrügers Klaus Maurischat, GoMOPa, Subject: Lösche uns oder Stirb !
From: “vertrieb@gomopa.net
Date: Mon, May 2, 2011 3:17 pm
To: office@ebizz.tv
Priority: Normal
Options: View Full HeaderView Printable VersionDownload this as a file

du altes arschloch hast imer nioch nicht uns gelöescht. ich bring dich um Du Schwein.Lösch und osder stirb wie der andere – Gerlach – vor uns bis du widerliches Stück Scheisse nicht si<cheer  Scha u blos in den Scheisshausfliebenblog von mir Dir zeigs ich

David U Random

Du weisst von wem das kommt !

BÖRSE ONLINE ÜBER DIE METHODEN DER KRIMINELLEN FINGIERTEN “GoMoPa”

BoerseOnline_Nr38_16.09.2010_Wo_gehobelt_wird

DIE SÜDDEUTSCHE ZEITUNG ÜBER DIE FINGIERTEN “GoMoPa” UND DEREN KRIMINELLE METHODEN

SZ_03.09.2010_Am_virtuellen_Pranger

FRANKFURTER ALLGEMEINE ZEITUNG ÜBER CYBERSTALKING UND DIE SERIENBETRÜGER DER FINGIERTEN “GoMoPa”

http://www.faz.net/s/Rub77CAECAE94D7431F9EACD163751D4CFD/Doc~E70F3E028C8E542D9B0AD6B2A8B1179C3~ATpl~Ecommon~Scontent.html

http://www.faz.net/s/RubEC1ACFE1EE274C81BCD3621EF555C83C/Doc~EB5651ECDC72949FF907D2CA89D5AFE72~ATpl~Ecommon~Scontent.html

GRÖSSTER WIRTSCHAFTSSKANAL: FINGIERTE STASI-”GoMoPa”– 3.400 MENSCHEN UD FIRMEN GESCHÄDIGT – Grösster Wirtschaftsskandal sei Dr. Jürgen Schneider

Liebe Leser,

über 3.400 Menschen und Firmen wurden und werden von STASI-”GoMoPa” gestalkt und erpresst.

Dies hat zu einem – so erste Schätzungen von Schadensexperten – Schaden von über € 1 Milliarde geführt, nimmt man als Berechnungsgrundlage

die im Falle von Meridian Capital geforderte Erpressungssumme.

Der immaterielle Schäden durch zerstörte menschliche Leben und Schicksale, dieser “Dämonen im Internet” (Eigenbezeichnung von Ober-Stalker “Klaus Maurischat”) ist noch viel höher und nur mit dem von der DDR-Gestapo angerichteten Schaden vergleichbar, deren Nachfolgeorganisation die fingierten “Goldman, Morgenstern u. Partner” – “GoMoPa” zweifelsohne sind.

Darunter sind auch etliche Todesfälle und viele Personen und Firmen, die nicht auf der 3.400 Fälle umfassenden “Warnliste”, besser Stalking, Betrugs- und Erpresserliste auftauchen.

Hinzu kommen zahlreiche Fälle von Börsenmanipulation wie im Falle “Wirecard” mit Pennystocks aus der US-Corporation-Schmiede von “GoMoPa”-Partner  “Graf” “Dr.” Stenbock.

Organisierte Kriminalität im ganz grossen Stil.

Wir bleiben am Ball.

Herzlichst Ihr

Magister Pernd Pulch

DIE “GoMoPa”-Opferliste 2010 – getarnt als “Warnliste” von den fingierten “Goldman, Morgenstern u. Partnern” erstellt

Folgende Firmen und Personen wurden u.a. von Peter Ehlers (wenn er denn so heisst) und “GoMoPa”, dem STASI-”NACHICHTENDIENST” seit Jahresanfang 2010– ohne jeden Beweis – verunglimpft und verleumdet u.a mit fingierten Presseberichten, fingierten Anzeigen und insbesondere im fingierten “OMoPa”-Berufsverbrecherportal verleumdet, um daraus Profit für Ihren postkommunistischen Saftladen zu schlagen:

GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
2
 Anton
 Abdul Sheikh
 Abraham
 Akcay
 Aksoy
 Aktürk
 Alexandre
 Alsguth
 Arnold
 Arnol Arslan
 Artschwager
 A & G Insurance Corporation
A & O Finanz- und Immobilenvertriebsservice GmbH
A+B Finanz
A+K Fina
 AA Capital
 ABAG BETEI
 Abbey House Acquisitions
 ABC Finanzdienst
 Accent-Finanz GmbH
 ACCENTA IMMOBILIEN MANAGEMENT AG
 ACI Alternative Capital Invest GmbH
 Acoreus Collection Service
 Acorn Consulting
 Activ 3000 GmbH
 Activa GmbH
 Activa Wirtschaftsberatung GmbH
 Actiwa Vermittlung von Finanz- und Vorsorgekonzepten e.K.
 Adeshieman Company
 Aditus Fonds GbR
 Admus AG
 Adolph & Komorsky International GmbH
 Advance Invest AG
 ADVANCE INVEST AG S.A.
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
3
 Advanced Group Kuwait
 Advanced Program Trading AG
 Advin Consult Finanzierungsvermittlungs GmbH
 Advisa Consulting GmbH
 Aeternus Energy Corp
 AFG AMERICAN FINANCIAL GROUP INC.
 Agentur Herold
 Agentur Leif Schurig
 AGR Allgemeine Gewerbedatei e.K.
 Ahorn Trust AG
 AIF Bank & Trust Company
 AJPA Broker SA
 Akeman Capital
 AKJ Allgemeine Leasing AG
 AKJ Privatfinanz AG
 AKJ-Firmengruppe
 AKK Dienstleistungs GmbH
 Aktienpower AG
 AktienPowerMarketing GmbH
 Akzenta AG
 Albion Investment Management
 Alexander Freiherr von Pillnitz & Berenberg Treuhandgesellschaft 1908 Limited
 Allgemeine Giro 24 GmbH
 ALLGEMEINE IMMOBILIEN-BÖRSE GmbH
 ALMO Hausbau GmbH
 Alpha Finanzsanierungs GmbH
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
4
 Alpha Oil Inc.
 Alphapool AG
 Alpina Finanz GmbH
 Alternative Capital Invest
 ALV Auto-Leasing und Vermietungs GmbH
 Alvino Group
 AMBROS/VBS
 American Investment & Finance Corporation
 AMK Akustikbau GmbH
 AMK Immobilienbetreuung GmbH
 Anderson & Goldberg S. L.
 Anderson McCormack Group S.L
 Anderton Stoner&Partner
 Anglo African Minerals plc
 Ango-Käufer-Service GmbH & Co. KG
 Antassia GmbH
 Anthony & Carter
 Apex Investments Corporation
 Apex Trading Group
 Applied Cash International
 APT Advanced Program Trading AG
 Aquaorbis AG
 ARCADIA Finanz- & Wirtschaftsberatung
 Arena GmbH
 Argos Finanz GmbH
 Ario AG
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
5
 Armaco
 Art Bauträger u. Immobilienhandelsgesellschaft mbH
 Artemis Financial
 AS Bau Berlin
 ASC AG für Satellitenkommunikation
 ASCANIA Vermögensverwaltung
 Ascor Media Ltd.
 ASG GmbH
 Assecura-Assecuranz Vermittlungs GmbH
 Associated Management Group
 Associated Management Group (AMG Zurich)
 Aston Rowe Consulting Advisory
 Atlantis Exploration AG
 Atlantis-Genossenschaft
 Au Vi Product GmbH
 Aufina Holding
 Aurora Gold Corp.
 Australian Lottery
 Autosafe Parkhaus AG
 Autotester 24
 AVAG Allgemeine Vermögensverwaltung AG
 AVAG-Funds
 AVD AG
 AVM AG
 AvW Invest AG
 AXXIOM AG
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
6
 Azalenia Basel AG
 Amaxopoulus
 Arntzen
 Aniol
 Altmann, Dr.
 Assenmacher
 Appel
 Aulenbach
 Aengenheister
 Amonath
 Asmus
 Almer
 Anlauf
 Aniol
 Blon von
 Barney
 Bajcar
 Bronischewski
 Butler
 Becker
 Berger
 Burat
 Buettner
 Behring
 Baumert
 Becker
 Bünning
 Bok
 Bahcecioglu
 Bahceli
 Balicioglu
 Balogh
 Barteczko
 Becker
 Bergenthal
 Bindokat
 Böhrer
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
7
 Born
 Bortstein
 Busch
 Böhm
 Braun
 Blum
 B u. S Technologie GmbH
 Bachmann Roth Advisory
 Badenia Bausparkasse
 Bagleys Investment Company
 Baltica Savings & Investment Cop.
 Bank Leumi AG
 Bankgesellschaft Berlin
 Banque Bruxelles Lambert (BBL)
 Barlow & Ramsey
 Barringer and Co.
 Basel Institutional
 Basic Trading Solution Ltd.
 Bau- und Grund Immobilien GmbH
 Bauconsult Gesell. für Haus- u. Grundbesitz
 Baucontrol GmbH
 Baufinanzierungszentrum Berlin – Karlshorst
 BAV-Konzept Versicherungsmakler GmbH
 Bavaria Invest Finanzmanagement
 Bavaria Trading Company
 Baye Invest
 BÖRSENPOWER Coaching und Verwaltungsges.m.b.H.
 BBAP Assekuranzmakler & Finanzdienstleistungs GmbH
 BeFa Invest GbmH & Co KG
 BelSwissBank
 BEMA Investitions- und Beteiligungsgesellschaft GmbH
 Benedict Lifeline GmbH
 BENEDICT Star GmbH
 Benitex AG
 Benson & Raymond Acquisition
 Berger Daniel
 Bergues Invest SA
 Bestgambling.Com
 BESTLIFESELECT AG
 BF Bayerische Baufinanz GmbH
 BFS Neckarsulm
 BFTS AG Schweiz
 BHG Baugenossenschaft Hockenheim e.G
 BIK Bauträger
 Biotech Development
 Bishop & Parkes Advisory
 Blanc & Baumar
 Blinder International
 BLISTER YACHTING GMBH
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
8
 Bloomfield Consulting AG
 Bond and Future Group Ltd.
 Bonetti & Wilmers
 Bonus Bauträgergesellschaft mbH
 Borsa Financial Inc.
 BR Consultance Alfaz S.L.
 Branchenklick
 Branko Financial Service
 BRAZIL-INVEST-VC LTDA
 RDS-Dienstleistungen
 Breadley Steigenberger & Partner (BSP)
 BREBA Invest S.L.
 Brentana Wohnbau GmbH
 Brett Commodities GmbH
 Bright Capital Banker Ltd
 Britannia Swiss Equities – BSE AG
 Brodowski Dach- und Fassadenbau GmbH
 Brodowski und Deyna Immobilien GmbH
 Brokers Society Sociedad de Gesti? Tramitaci Financier
 Brown & Lampe U.S. Portfolio Management Ltd.
 BSD GmbH
 Bullion Trading Group
 Bund der Verbraucher (BDV)
 Burbach Consulting GmbH
 Business Partner Credit GmbH
 Brauer
 Bogatz
 Birner
 Bastert
 Baeuerle
 Bertges
 Barteczko
 Bertges
 Beyer
 Bogatz
 Bender
 Bens
 Bösebeck
 Bouderi
 Baan
 Bender
 Birkins
 BECK
 Barthel
 Beyreuther
 Banghard
 Bohrmann
 Bauer
 Bludau
 Bajcar
 Bernhart
 Belkenheid
 Barthel
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
9
 Baumbach
 Barde
 Casula
 Carsten
 Celik
 Cengiz
 Clemann
 Cura
 Cuti
 Cuti
 Campa
 C & P Mutual
 C. Gewerbeimmobilien
 Callux Forderungsmanagement
 Calvin & Sanderson Associates
 Cambridge Asset Management AG
 Cameron Poe & Associates Inc.
 CAP-NETWORK AG
 Capital Securities International
 Capitalinform Limited SA
 Capitalinform Limited SA
 Car Leasing Agency Ltd.
 Carsten Haus GmbH
 Carver Brooks & Associates Ltd.
 Cash Group AG
 Cash-Immobilien GmbH
 Cashselect
 CasMaker Ltd.
 Castor Capital
 Cater & Sattler OHG
 Caviar Creator Inc
 CB Freie Versicherungsmakler GmbH
 CBC
 CDH AG
 Census Grund GmbH & Co KG
 Centracon
 Centracon Investment AG
 Centro Euro Service AG
 Centro Euro Service AG
 Centro-Service GmbH
 Ceptum AG
 Ceres Warenhandels- und Beratungsgesellschaft mbH
 Certus Consulting
 CH Devisen Macht SA
 CHEAPLY SMOKING CLUB
 Chiemgauer Vermögensverwaltung
 Chips Virtual Casino
 CIC Insurance Company SA
 Cinerenta Gesellschaft für Internationale Filmproduktion mbH
 Cis Deutschland AG
 City Hyp Finanzierungsvermittlung
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
10
 City Zins Finanzierungsvermittlungs AG
 CL Inkasso AG
 CL Inkasso AG
 Clean Lease GmbH
 CLEAN PATENT GMBH
 Club Alanzo VIP Cruises
 CMP Global Consulting Ltd
 CMX Capital Markets Exchange AG
 CNP Casino
 Colebrooke Management Holdings
 Color für Kinder e.V.
 Comitas Agentur VSV
 Commercial Development Bank
 Commercial First Trading Corporation
 Complete Commodity Trading
 Comroad AG
 ComTex Vermögens- und Verwaltungs GmbH
 OMVAL Capital AG
 Concorde International – Business Consultants
 Condor Gold and Minerals Inc.
 Conductis GmbH
 Conik Invest
 Coninvest Finanz AG
 Conradi & Hilger Gbr mbH
 Consens Gesellschaft für Projektentwicklung u. Vermittlung von Immobilien
 Consolidated Capital Management Limited (CCML)
 Content Services Ltd.
 Contracta Grundstücksmanagement GmbH
 Convent Consulting GmbH
 CONVERGEX CARIBBEAN, LTD.
 Conzeptfinance Ltd.
 Cooperativa Extranjero de Credito y Investiamento SA
 Cornhill Management S.L.
 Cosena Management S.L.
 CP Medien AG
 CPTD – Central Patent & Trademark Database
 CR Consulting GmbH
 Credit for you Limited
 Credit Mirabaud
 Creditnet Bank Internationale
 CS Capital Service GmbH
 CST Umwelttechnik und Innovation e.G.
 Cumulus Gesellschaft für Immobilien- Investitionen mbH
 Cura Investitions- und Beteiligungsgesellschaft
 Cmok
 Cordes
 Chuen
 Drabnitzke
Dana
Dogs
Doll
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
11
Doujak
Dziuba
Dorsch
Becker
DAK Finanz
Danaro Invest
Asset Management
DAT Finance AG
DBVI AG
De Lotto Switzerland
Delmont Wealth Management
Deltoton AG
DEM Marketing
Demirok GmbH Bauunternehmen
Densch & Schmidt GmbH
Der Informant GmbH
Deutsche Contracting GmbH
Deutsche Immobilien Grundvermögen Holding AG
Deutsche Mentor für Finanzen (DMFF) e.K.
Deutsche Mentor für Finanzen AG
Deutschen Anlage- und Beteiligungs Aktiengesellschaft (Dabag)
Develop Management GmbH
Deyna Immobilien GmbH
DHB-Dreiländer-Handels und Beteiligungsgesellschaft Walter Fink KG
Die Agentur
Die Tradergemeinschaft – Best of Marketing SARL
Dierig Unternehmensberatung
DIHA Dienstleistungs – und Handel GmbH
DIP AG
DIREKTE VERMÖGENSBERATUNGSGESELLSCHAFT MBH
Direkter Anlegerschutz e.K.
Distefora Holding AG
Dividium Capital Ltd
DLF-Immobilienportfolio-Walter-Fink KG
DM Beteiligungen AG
DMI Derivatives Management Inc.
DMP-Gruppe
DMV – Deutsche Markenverlängerungs GmbH
Dohmen-Invest
Domizil Immobilien Leasing GmbH
Domusfinanz
Dow Win Financial Group Corporation
DPMV-Deutsche Patent- und Markenverlängerung GmbH
Dr. Antonio GAMPA
Dr. Bassam Bouderi
Dr. Cornelius Gregorius Consulting Inc
Dr. Gerbig Treuhand GmbH
Dr. Görlich Grundbesitzbeteiligungs GmbH
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
12
Dr. Hanne Grundstücks GmbH
Dr. Hartmannsdorf Immobilien GmbH
Dr. Mayer & Cie. GmbH
Dr. Peters
Dr. Schmitt Inc.
Dr. Werner Financial Service AG
Dragon Partners Inc.
Dreiländerfonds DLF
Dreiländerfonds DLF-94/17
Drexel Management GmbH
Dubai International Investment & Trading
Dubai-1000-Hotel-Fonds
Duesenberg Financial Group Inc.
Dunas de Corralejo S.L.
Dupont Conseille AG
Dux Partners AG
Dörflinger
Dallüge
Deutsch
Dittel
Dierkes
Deubelbeiss
Dallinger
Drewitz
Eichhorn
Erber
Elbert
Ebner
Eroglu
Eschinger
Ettelt
Evcil
E-Money Power (EMPFX)
E.U.R.O.- Unternehmens- & Wirtschaftsberatungs- Ltd.
EAG AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT für WIRTSCHAFT
Earnshaw Advisory Services
Earthsearch Communications Inc.
Easy Concept Hamburg KG ( E@sy )
EBC AG
EBCON – Europäische Verbraucherberatung
Ebcon Europäische Verbraucherberatung AG
Ecco
Economy Capital Corporation
Ecotrend Holding AG
ECP Euro Caribbean Properties Ltd.
ECTO GmbH
Ecumoney Limited
Edgar Heumann GmbH
EECH AG
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
13
EEIG – Europäische Wirtschaftskammer
Effekten- und Edelmetallberatungs GmbH
Effinance Private Equity AG
EKC
Elbe Emissionshaus
Elefant Immobilien GmbH
EM.TV AG
EMA Event Management Agentur GmbH
Embdena
Emmerson Bennett
Empresa Minera (Bergbau) AG
Enexoma AG
Equinox Private Consultants Ltd.
ERGO-Plan
Erich Holderer Finanzdiestleistungen
ESKATA Finanz- Immobilien- Handels GmbH
ESTEKAR LIMITED
Estreel GmbH & Co.KG
EuMedien
Eurefi Eurefi Holding AG
Euregio Immobilien L&F B.V.
EURENTA Gesellschaft für Anlagen-, Renten- und Sparkonzeptionen GmbH
EURENTA Gesellschaft für Marketing- und Promotion GmbH
Euring GmbH
EURO CREDIT UNION
EURO Finanz Consult AG
Euro Finanz Management
Euro Kapital AG
Euro Real Investment Company
Euro Trading GmbH
Euro-American Beteiligungsvermittlungsg. MbH
EURO-CONSULT e.K.
Euro-Pool AG
EUROCAPITAL BANK INC.
Eurocapital Investment Corporation
EURODOM Berlin GmbH
Eurogoldtrader
Eurokapital AG
Eurolink Consult GmbH
European Estates&Investment AG
European Kings Club
European Trade marks and Designs
European Trademark Organisation S.A.
Europäische Schuldenregulierungs- und Ausgleichsanstalt
Europäische Wirtschaftskammer für Handel, Gewerbe und Industrie
EUROTRADE & CONSULTING AG
Eurotrust Capital Management
EV&K
Evantus Invest
EVD Direktverkaufs AG
EWR Wirtschaftsdatenregister
Exakt Martkanalysen Research GmbH
Exeltrade
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
14
Engels
Eder
Esser
Elas
Ehrenberg
Eilts
Eich
Eich
Eder
Engler
EISENBERG
 Felgner
Flug
Feyh
Freke
Florian
Fasan
Fritsch
Freiherr von Fink
Fink
Ferrera Dr. F & P Aktiengesellschaft & Co. KG
F.I.P. GmbH
F.V.F
FA. Haustein Finanzvermittlung
Fafa Capital
Faktor 1 GmbH
Falcon Euro Trading Limited
Falcon Oil Group
Falk Capital AG
Falk-Gruppe
Falken Depot Management GmbH
Falken GmbH
Falken Vermögensverwaltung GmbH
FALLON BANCROFT HOLDING
Fashionact Industries Inc.
Noske
FB Bauträger GmbH
FDMV FINANZDIENSTLEISTUNGEN
FFB Dörflinger GmbH
FFCC Verwaltungs GmbH & Co. Finanzdienstleistungs KG
FG Finanz-Service AG
FGP & Cie
Fibeg Finanzberatung- und Vermögensverwaltungs GmbH
Fibu AG
Fideles & Associates AG
Fidelity International
FIDU payment services S.A.
Finama Vermögensverwaltungs KG
Finance Concept GmbH
Finance Service International
Financial Consulting
Financial Consulting UK Limited
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
15
Financial Planning Systems Ltd.
Financieros Panama – Societaet Rodriguez Batista Diaz
Finanz Score GbR
Finanz Service Hennig
Finanzprogramme Bentley & Partner
FINANZtest Center
Finanzvermittlung Fritz Guth
Finanzvermittlung und Wirtschaftsdienst Ott GmbH
Finbrands Global Limited
Fine Trading Group Finvest Asset Management
FIPTR Federated Institute for Patent- &
Trademark Registry First Canadian Joint Venture
& Consulting Inc. First Canadian Joint Venture
& Consulting Inc. (Canada)
First China Corporate Management Group
First Garant Fund AG First Intercontinental
Bancorp. Ltd. First Invest Grundbesitz
GmbH First Invest Swiss Trade
First Real Estate Grundbesitz GmbH
First Saxonia Trading Ltd
Flash Finance Floris Bank
FOCUS Immobilien und Projektbau GmbH
FOKUS INVEST AG Foma Internationale
Inkassogesellschaft mbH
Fondax Capital Trust GmbH & Co. KG
Fondshaus Hamburg FORBIS Corporation
Force Worldwide Investments Corp
Foreign Exchange Clearing House Ltd.
Forest Finance Service GmbH
Forex4free Forexone-Broker
Forst Finance AG Four Stars AG
Frankonia Sachwert AG FRD International
Free Finance -Service Futura Finanz AG
Futura-Concept GmbH FXTSwiss
Fridez Fridez
Frau Floßbach
Fritz Franko
Frerichs Fink
Fridez Fasan
Filsinger
Freiherr von Lepel
Frydenlund Foetzsch
Fridez Fridez
Fitz
Grüters
Geyer
Gonnes
Grüner
Gerlach
Gast
Gräbedünkel
Gustav

GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
16
Güttig
Gläßer
Gehle
Gerome
GOLDEN-BALLARIN
Golsch
Gronemeyer
Görlich
Götzl
Gaber
Graupner
Guth
G+M Baubetreuung GmbH
G.V.V. bR.
G.W.F. Grundwert-Bauträger G.M.B.H
Gaiacor International PLC
Galant Immobilien GmbH
Garant Kreditvermittlung
Garant-Hundsdorff-Istanbul
GEBAB
Gebrüder Schmidtlein GbR
GEcoS Holding AG
Geldfinder GmbH
Gemas GmbH
Genius Insurance Service GmbH
Genius Investments – Genius Funds
Geoteck Inc.
Gerd Esser Grundbesitz GmbH
GerGermania Grundbesitz AG
Germania Venture Capital AG
Gesellschaft für Erbenermittlung
Gesellschaft für Exklusive Veranstaltungen Dortmund mbH
Gesellschaft für Finanz- u. Wirtschaftsdienstleistungen (FiWi)
Gesellschaft zur Datensicherung im Internet (GSDI)
Gesellschaft zur Vermittlung kapitalorientierter Finanzanlagen GmbH (GVFK)
GetAssisted Group
GfS Invest GmbH
GGHF Windpark Sitten GmbH & Co. KG
GHS Unternehmensgruppe
GIP Grundstücks-Immobilien & Projektmanagement GmbH
GIV Gesellschaft für Immobilien und Vermögensverwaltung mbH
Glatt & Partner GmbH
GLOBAL – BAU Immobilien GmbH
Global AWS AG
Global Capital Group
Global Cogenix Industrial Corp.
Global Financial Invest AG
Global Foreign Exchange (Switzerland) AG
GLOBAL LIFESTYLE GROUP S.A.
Global Mineral Resources Corp.
Global Pension Plan
Globaltraiding.com Kapitalmanagement
Globalus (Immobilien) Gmbh & Co. KG
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
17
GM Capital Partners
GMF Finanz AG
GMF Treuhandgesellschaft mbH
GO AHEAD SERVICE LTD
GOJ AG
Gold-Barren-Silber.com
Gold-Versandhandel
Goldstein & Partner Inc.
GOT Thimm GmbH
GPS GmGrand Capital Ltd
Great Berlin Wheel GmbH & Co. KG
Grevenreuth AG
Grund und Boden Beteiligungs AG
Grundstücksgemeinschaft Arslan
Grupo Esdinero
Grünewälder GmbH
GSM Gesellschaft für Professionelles Sachwert Management AG
GSM Gesellsc
GTO Gap Trading Online
Gulf Oil Exploration Inc.
GVW – Wirtschaftsclub
GWG Gesellschaft für Wirtschaftsplanung mbH
Göttinger Gruppe
Göttler Finanz AG
Graf
Guillaume
Gropper
Göker
Grotelaers
Günzel
Gelbke
Haugg
Halbey
Händel
Hansen
Heise
Hensel
Hipp
Hirner
Hirth
Heider
Hickl
Hansel
Hauser
Härtel
Heckler
Hambusch Prof.
Herold
Hering Dr.
Herr Budzinski
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
18
Heyer
Hering Dr.
Hartung
Hesselmann
Hettrich
Heiner
Händel
Heinrich
Hartl
Hansch
Hartung
Hepp
Heinekken van
Hanne
Heiliger
Heumann
Hensley-Piroth
Haffa
Holderer
Helfer
Heckmann
Hormann
Hennig
Hermsmeier
Hornberger
Halabi
Herr Gieselmann
Hundsdorff
Hanisch
Hornig
Hambusch Prof.
H.R.L. International
H2O Swiss AG
Hafenstein Marketing GmbH
Hamburg Connection
Hamilton Associates A.G.
Handelshaus Schaar
Handelskontor Fischer
Hansa Treuhand
Hanse Capital
Hanse Club
Hanseatische AG
Hanseatische Senatorenkanzlei
Hansefina GmbH
Hartl Immobilien
Hartl Immobilienmanagement GmbH
Harz Börde Finanz
Haus- und Vermögensverwaltung GmbH (HaVeWa)
Hauser Treuhand Rorschach HTR
Haushaltsfuchs
HB Capital Partners
HBW-Finanz AG
HCI Capital
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
19
HDL Hausdienstleistungsgesellschaft mbH
Helvag AG
Helvetia Treuhand GmbH
Helvetia Treuhand-Union GmbH
Hentsch & Müller S.A.
Hermes Beteiligungs AG
Hermes Portfolio Management GmbH
Bens
HKA-Bank 1954 Ltd.
HNH Finanzberatung-Treuhand GmbH
Horn Wolfgang Dr.
HouseFX AG
HTB Holding
HuHWH International AG
Hypo – Leasing B.V.
Heinen
Hagen
Hoff
Hensel
Hampe
Hauser Metzler
Harksen
Huber
Hartung
Hübner
Hönnscheidt
Hettrich
Hering Dr.
Hettrich
Hübner
Ihl
Izmirlioglu
Izmirlioglu
Immega
I-investorclub Ltd.
I.B.F.T.P.R. International Bureau for Federated Trademark Patent Register
I.B.I.P. International Bureau for Intellectual Property
I.F.I. Ltd. Milincic
IAZ & Partners
IBB GmbH
IBB INTERNATIONAL
IBEKA Immobilienbeteiligung AG
IBH Limited
ICB – Intercontinental Brokerage Corporation
ICM Basel
IContent GmbH
Idee Immo Concept GmbH
Idilei-Treuinvest
IFF AG Zukunftsunternehmen für Investment, Fonds, Finanzen
IFIC Integra Financial Consulting GmbH
IFS International Financial Services Inc.
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
20
IHB Immobilien Heinen & Biege GmbH
IKF
Immorenta Immobilienbeteiligungsgesellschaft mbH
Imperia Invest IBC
Indara Projekt AG
Indices International Group IIG
Info-ZentralInformations-Service-Center (ISC)
Inkasso Team Moskau / TMA GmbH
Innoflex
Innovatio Allfinanz & Franchise System AG
INT Elektrizitätswerk Beteiligungs KG
Integral Finanz AG
Integral Treuhand Vermögensverwaltung GmbH
Integro Capital Partners
Intellectual Property Agency Ltd.
Inter Alpen AG
Inter Capital Bank
Inter Capital Bank Ltd.
Inter Credit Group
Interbank Asset Management Group AG / InterBank AG
Intercontinental Financial Developments Plc.
Interessensgemeinschaft Barbara Merkens
Interfinance Investment & Credits
Interglob AG
INTERMEX International Ltd.
International Bioremediation Services Inc.
International Insurance Holding Inc.
International Invest Ltd
International Travel Services Ltd.
Internet Media AG
Internetwebshop
Inventaire Pro
Inveractivos
InvestInvestor Relations Corp.
Inveteratus Asset Management
IOPTS International Organization for Patent & Trademark Service Corporation
IPS AG – Internationale Produktvermarktungs Systeme
ISR Management & Consulting Ltd
ISS Immobilien Schutz und Service AG (ISS AG)
ISS Immobilienschutz und Service AG
ITL-Enterprises Inc.
Immega
Ibekwe
Just
Jochum
Jester
Junges
Jaeger Research GmbH
Jefferies Associates Group
Jejkal AG Strategische Investments
Johnsons Banking Group
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
21
Johnsons Banking Group
Joseph Cooke Ltd.
Julius Brown AG
Jump
Jachnicki
Jaufmann
Jansson
Jonas
Jedlitschka
Junghänel
Junghänel
Junghänel
Juratsch
Jentzer
Jilg
Jung
Karabunar
Kriewald
Knobloch
Kinner
Käner
Kontze
Kratz
Kostas
Körner
Keffel – Fallahi
Kaiser
Klein
Klaas
Krenzer
Kletsch
Kappes
Kloiber
Kiehl
Kappes
KlaffenböcKraushaar
Kleefisch
Krefft
Klaffenböck
Kaltofen
Kühnen
K & S -Frisia
K&K. B. P. Vermögensverwaltung
K1 Group
K1-Group
Kaikatsu Group
Kanzlei Knil
Kanzlei Range & Partner
Kapital-Consult GmbH
Karriere AG
Köllner-Unternehmensgruppe
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
22
König & Cie
KCP Bank
Kingside Establishment
Kirkland Lee
KK ImmobilienFonds I AG & Co. KG a.A.
Kleeblatt4U
Koch & Eilts GmbH & Co. KG
Koh-I-Noor
Konnex ImmoInvest GmbH
Konsumgüter Direktvertrieb e.V
Kredit einfach Vermittlungs GmbH
Krug Immobilien GmbH
KSF Korrespondenz-Service für Finanzsysteme
KSK International Ltd.
KubKusch und Partner GmbH
Kutag Capital Partners AG
Kutag Group
Kuwait Finance & Investment Company
KVG Internationale Kapitalvermittlung
KVV-Profi Management- und Beteiligung AG
KWD-Marketing
Kühne Bauspar- und Finanzierungsfachbüro
Küng & Partner Vermögensverwaltung AG
Klaffenböck
Klostermann
Keiner
Klappenbach
Klappenbach
Kastler
Kuzmanovic
Kraus
Keil
Kulecki
Kahnhäuser
Klein
Kuhlee
Karabunar
K.
Knobloch
Kiok
Klinge
Koehn
Kuhlen
Lebinger
Lorenz
Luft
Lampe
Leonhard
LehnoLohmann
Lohmann
Lee
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
23
Leindecker
Lökkevik
Lucky Prices S.L.
Lepel Freiherr von
Lemke
Linder
Littig
Langanke
Limburg
Laubach
Lins
Lüthi
LAM Immobilien- und Beteiligungs AG
Landesbank Berlin – LBB/IBV Fonds
Landmark Invest Ltd.
Lange Vermögensberatung GmbH
Lange Vermögensberatung GmbH
Langenbahn AG
LBB-Fonds
LDG Capital Markets Company Limited
Lenz Immobilienhandel AG
Life
Lifetime Products Inc.
Liquid Asset Management Inc.
Lisser Consulting
Litz United GmbH & Co. KG
Locat – Projektsteuerung GmbH
Locstein Asset Management AG
Logotype Klostermann, Lässig
London Hong Kong Exchange plc
LPA Financial Services
LSC. Ltd.
Ltd. Ifi
LVA Garant Fund Inc.
Lichtenfels
Lenz
Leuze
Lengdorfer
Lutz
Marien
Möbius
Müller
Müller
Mohm
Morgenstern
Markof
Müller Dr.
Mathy
Müller
Miersch
Matten
24
Moulatsiotis
MichalMatthiesen
Milincic
Matthies
Merkens
Marx
Meyer
Madden Group Inc.
Magnus GmbH&CO KG
MALAYSIA Credit
Malaysiacredit Van Bergen Corp.
Mallorca Trading
Malmsbury, Harrington and Seaford
Maonara AG
Marine Shuttle AS
Marine Shuttle Operations Inc.
Mark Marketing S.R.O.
Matic-Verlagsgesellschaft mbH
Matterhorn International
Mayer und Cie GmbH
MC Management Consulting & Financial Services
MCC Mariaux Chevre & Cie
McKenzie-Boyle Associates
Med-Synergy Mallorca GmbH & Co. KG
Media Concepte
Media Inkassomanagement AG
Media-Com LTD & Co. KG
Medivest
MEG AG
Mercaforex – Silver Holdings International Ltd.
Mercantus AG
Mercury Forex Investments Assets Ltd.
Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd
METROPOL LEASING GMBH
MFIVE Ltd.
MFS 24
MG Beteiligungs AG
MICONA LTD.
MidAtlantic Holdings plc
Minera Real del Barqueno S.A.
Mitschka Alternative Advisory
MJS Developments S.A.
MK Service & Vertrieb
MK- Service & Vertrieb
MMC Medialog Marketing Company
MMCIS Investments
Mobilica.de
MOLY-FLON LIMITED
Money and Capital ASS.
Money Plus Worldwide Financial Limited
MonMach Marine Insurance Company Ltd.
Morgan Franklin Investment Inc.
MPC Capital
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
25
MPC Capital AG
Mueller Capital Management (MCM)
Multi Advisor Fund I GbR
MWB Vermögensverwaltungs AG
Mehler
MÖLLER-BÜCKINS
Montag
Morris
Manns
Meyer
Mundt
MILLS
McGregor
Müller
 Nicolic
Noske
Neumann
Naumann
Nieder
Noske
Nitsche
Natea Financial Transactions Division
Nationales Markenregister AG
Natur- und Erlebniswelt Schmölln GmbH
NEO TECH PUBLISHING COMPANY INC.
Net Mobile AG
Netsolutions FZE
NEUBERT & PARTNER FINANZMANAGEMENT GMBH
Neuburg Financial AG
Neue Medien GmbH
New Century Capital
NEW Naturpark und Erlebniswelt Schmölln
New World Financial
Newton Forest
Noble Advisory Group
Nodorf und Partner
Non plus ultra Marketing GmbH
Nord Finanz KG
Nord-Analyse/Jürgen Harksen
Nordcapital
Norddeutsche Vermögensverwaltung
North Am GmbH
NOVI BETEILIGUNGS GMBH
NUEVO GMBH
NWK Consulting
NYTS New York Trading Services Ltd.
Nünlist
Noack
 Ohles
Ohlmann
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
26
Obermann
Ohlenschläger
Ottersbach
O Online Casino
OBA OBJEKTPLANUNGS UND BAUGESELLSCHAFT MBH
Obtime GmbH
Ocean s Continental AG
EKOFINANZ PIPER & FISCHER (ÖKOFINANZ)
Offshore Shuttle AS
Olaf Tank – Rechtsanwalt
OLF OBERLAUSITZER FACTORING UND LEASING GMBH
OMNIKRON VERWALTUNGSGESELLSCHAFT MBH
Soldwisch
Optimal-Unternehmensgruppe
Opus one Corporation
Organi Juris GmbH
ORGANIJURIS HOLDING AG
Ost Com Holding AG
Ownership Emissionshaus
Ommer
Oberle
Olek
 Petrenko
Prehn
Piroth
Pelz
Pfeiffer
Piroth
Pirkel
Pirkel
Petsch
Pröckel
Pirkel
Pilling
Pirkel
Paco Integrated Energy Inc.
Pacon Capital S.A.
Pacta Invest GmbH
PACTA-INVEST GmbH
Partner Air Limited
Partner-Computer-Group Ltd.
PayPay Inc.
PayPay S.a.r.l.
PCG
Pentafox Höhn OHG
Pepper United S.R.O.
Perfect4u
Pharma Kontor AG
Phillip Alexander Securities & Futures Ltd.
Phoenix Kapitaldienst GmbH
Phönix Aktiengesellschaft
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
27
Phönix Finanzsanierungs AG
Platinum Group International
Platonja GmbH
Plim Cooperation AG
PLUS CONCEPT GMBH
Plus Finanz Consulting GmbH
Postbank Finanzberatung AG
PPV Produkt-Promotion-Vertrieb
Pradofin
Premium Capital
Premium Firmenservice GmbH
Prime Core AG
Prime Gold Invest AG
Prime Select AG
Primus Consulting Optionshandel GmbH
Prinz zu Hohenlohe Jagstberg & Banghard GmbH
Private Commercial Office (PCO)
Private Equity Capital Group
Private Equity Invest AG
Private Fiduciary Trust GmbH
Private Investment Brokers and Financial Fonds Inc.
PRIZMA F.A. CENTER
Profi Moderne Wohnungsbaugenossenschaft
Profit.sawas.info
Projekta GmbH
Projostar GmbH
Prokon Kapital GmbH
Protectas Vermögensberatung GmbH
Protected International Inc.
PS-Leasing
Piroth
Petry
 Quinz
QES – Die Geldarchitekten
Quantum Asset Management
Quatro Group
QUEEN GMBH
Quinz Jürgen
Quorum AG
 Riesen van
Reegen
Riviera
Rose
Reinke
Ruppert
Rautenberg
Rüdenauer
Rist
Röll
Rohde
Runyeon
Rieß de Sanchez
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
28
Rachensperger
Ramin
Rohde
Range
Reich
Rummelt
Runyeon
Reimers
Rohbeck
R&S GmbH
R.A.P. Vermögensanlagen-Aktiengesellschaft & Co. KG Immobilienverwaltung
Racingkasino.Com
Rainbow Real Estate Ltd.
Ralph Hübner Verlag
Ranston Ltd
Ranston Ltd.
Ravena Finanz Management AG
RDV GmbH
Real Estate AG
Rechtsanwalt Asmus
Register of Commerce – Markenregisterverzeichnis
Renko & Associates
Renta / Löwer
Rentmeister KG
Res Justitia GmbH
Residencia GmbH
Rheinisch Westfälische Grundbesitz AG
Richmond & Palmer Investments Inc
Riverblue GmbH
RK-invest intern. Ltd.
RKI Invest
RKV Finanzservice
Robyns Capital GmbH
Robyns Vermögensverwaltung GmbH
Rodman & Shaw Ltd.
Rontax-Treuhand
Rosiak Dr.
Ruhrstrom GmbH
Ruluso Holding Ltd.
Rushton Limited
Ruspa Capital AG
Ruyan Europe
Richter
Reime
Richtsteig
Rademann
Rippel
 Sälinger
Schwarz
Stefan
Storm
Seuchter
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
29
Seumenicht
Schaefer
Scholl
Siegert
Schuhmann
Scharl
STRÖMBERG
Stanley
Splisteser
Sablowski
Schwarz
Stumpf
Scholz
Steigenberger
Schmidt
Seebacher
Sümper
Steuten
Schwartz
Simon
Schrämli
Spilker
Spanier
Seci
Stolte
Stolte
Schmid
Schmid
Schroeder
Seidel
Schmidtlein
Stangl
Steinbach
Stecker
Szulc
Schäfer
Spilker
Scholl
Stadelmaier
Shadi
Schäfer
Schmidt
Schaul
Sulser -Eggenberger
Schwarz
Sch.
S.
Schroeder Dr.
Schierloh
Sinn
Soldwisch
Smith
Schmidt
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
30
Schrenk
Schieweck
Schmidt
S.
Schmid
S&K Deutsche Sachwert AG
S.B.E. Bank
S.B.E. Financial SA
S.L.I.C.E AG
Sachsen Planke GmbH
Sachsenpark AG
Safe Inrest Quota Obtain Ltd (auch bekannt unter SIQO)
Sagro
Sakura Financial Group
SAM FINANZ AG – Swiss Asset Management
San West Inc.
Sauer & Söhne
Saxonia Sparkasse Inc.
SBAG – Schweizerische Börsenabwicklungsgesellschaft mbH
Schmid Immobilien Ltd.
Schmiedendorf Arzneimittelvertrieb AG
Schuhbecks am Platzl GmbH
Schutzvereinigung der Versicherten, Sparer und Kapitalanleger e. V.
Schwabenland Büro
Schweizer Kapital AG
SCT Bank Ltd.
SD Global Equity AG & Co. KG
Seabed Invest AG
SEB Bank AG
Sebeka GmbH
Secured Communications Limited
Securenta AG
Securities Regulatory and Investment Board (SRIB)
Senior Invest
Servicebüro Natter
SFP Private Banking
SFR AG (Swiss Finance Research AG)
Sherwood Henderson Limited
Shibby & Partners
Sigma Leasing Ltd.
Sigma Trading Limited
Signature Equities Agency GmbH
Signum Edelsteine GmbH
Sisko System Haus AG
Skyline Advisory Group
Solatera Energy AG
Sole Invest GmbH
Solventa Finanzservice GmbH
Sophisticated Investor Inc.
SP Trade Investment Capital Ltd. / SP Trader Fund
Sparkasse Dortmund
Spree Finanz AG
Spree-Capital GmbH
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
31
Star Invest
Stebo GmbH
Steinberg Investment Research AG
Steinberg Investments Ltd.
Stephens Capital Markets Limited
Sterling Asset Management AG
STIFX (stifxonline.com)
Stifxonline.com
Stonehard Consulting d.o.o.
Stratton & Partner
Stratton Wainwright
Suisse Banking
Suisse Life Securities
Sunset Handelsgesellschaft Unternehmergesellschaft
SVK Marketing GmbH
SVM24Direkt
SWAG – Schweizerische Wertpapierabrechnungsgesellschaft AG
SWD Sächsischer Wirtschaftsdienst
Swiss Agricole Asset Management
Swiss Basis GmbH
Swiss Bellair Bank
Swiss Credit Trust AG
SWISS DIVISION
Swiss Finance Conceptions & Marketing AG
SWISS Finance Consult
Swiss Finance Consult AG
Swiss Finance Consult AG
Swiss Finance Research AG
Swiss Key Equity Consult AG
Swiss Lotto – Gesellschaft Schweizer Zahlenlotto
Swiss Lotto Agency
Swiss Lotto Highstakes
Swiss Marketing GmbH
Swiss Siam Investment Club
Swiss Trading
Swiss World Cyber Lottery International – Swiss Lottery
Swiss-American Capital Management Institute,Inc.
SwissAudit Aktiengesellschaft
SwissKap AG
Swisskontor GmbH
Swissridge International Corp.
Switzerland Investment Group
Süddeutsche Stabak AG
Süddeutsche Stabak Aktiengesellschaft AG
Südwestbank AG
System Vorsorge Kapitalvermittlung (SVK)
Schmuck
Simon
Schlag
Sonntag
Schellscheidt
Schildbach
Schmidt
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
32
Surowiec
 Tzolov
Tannenbaum
Thomson
Tucholke
Traxel
Teller
Trisl
TOBER
Tausch
Trice
Thimm
Turgut
Tank
T.K. Immobilien GmbH
Taipan
Talis Enterprise GmbH
Task Force Service GmbH
Taurus GmbH
TBC-Marketing AG
Telba GmbH
Tele Inside s.r.o.
Tellba GMBH
The Crown Group CH
The Vale Group / Vale Group InvestmentsVale Group Asset Management /
Thomas Moore
Titan
Titan Trading Group
TiViBo GmbH
Tortola Capital
Trade Direct GmbH
Transatlantic Business & Management Ltd.
TRC Telemedia e.K.
Treberhilfe Berlin gGmbH
Treff Hotel Beteiligung
Trend Capital AG
Treu-Control Wirtschaftsberatungs- und Treuhandgesellschaft mbH
Treulux AG
Tri-Hub International
Triagon Holding AG
Trias Erste KG
Trias Zweite KG
Trikom Consulting GmbH
Trinity Ventures
TSI Consulting
TSI-Consulting
Turner Mayfield Advisory A.G.
TVI Express
Two For 1 Sportsbook
TXL Business Academy GmbH
TXL Capital Management GmbH
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
33
Tang
Täubert
 Ullmann
Uhlendorff
UBS Deutschland AG
UFB VERMITTLUNGSGESELLSCHAFT MBH
UFP
UGV Inkasso
Ulrich Engler Daytrading
Ulrich Petry
ULRICH VERLAG KG
ULRICH- VERLAG KG
Unabhängige Wirtschaftskanzlei Wolfgang Gelbke
Unia Holding AG
Unia Industrie Holding AG
Unispar Banque PLC
United Invest Management Deutschland Ltd & Co. KG
United Investors
United Markets (Asia) Limited
United Network Industries (Uni AG)
United Re-Insurance Group
United Trust Bank Plc.
United Trust of Switzerland S.A
United Trust of Switzerland S.A.
Unitymedia Hessen GmbH & Co KG
Universal Settlements International (USI) Inc.
Univest Limited
Univesta
Univesta Björk Immobilien und Anlage GmbH & Co.
Unternehmensgruppe Esdinero
UOT Financial Services Limited
US GOLD INTERNATIONAL LTD.
US Securities Agency (USSA)
Usecom Software AG
 Volkmann
Völl
Vitor
Voß
van Dien
van Dyken
Voll
von Eugen
Varin
Varin
Vejpustek
Volk
Vogel
von Krauthahn
V-O-B Handelsgesellschaft mbH
V/F Operation Leasing GmbH
VABA AG
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
34
ValueMaker
VALUTA VERMÖGENSVERWALTUNG GMBH
VanFunds / Vandior Inc.
Vanilla
VCI
Ventana Biotech Inc.
Ventono Capital GmbH
Venture Associates
Verbraucherdienst.e.V
Verimount FZE
Versicherungsdienst
Vertex Commodities
Verum Placement Ltd.
Vierte Juragent GmbH & Co. Prozesskostenfonds KG
VIT EnvironmentSystems AG
Vitascanning AG
Viva Tenerife Services
Volkssolidarität Sozial-Immobilien GmbH
Volkssolidarität Sozialimmobilienfonds GmbH & Co. KG
 Wood
Wächter
Wintzler
Willer
Wiedenbauer
Walkemeyer
Weimer
Walkemeyer
Wolter
Wolter
Wagner
W.
Wagner
Wolfram
Wolfram
Werner Dr.
Wagner
Wulff
Wagner
Weislogel
Walker
Wagner
WABAG – Wirtschaftsanalyse und Beratung AG
Wagner Finanzvermittlung GmbH
Wahl + Partner GmbH
Warrick Management Group Ltd.
Waterman Associates
WBwso Ltd
Wconstrukt
Wealth and Asset Planning
Webtains GmbH
Weizman Associates
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
35
Weizman Associates LLC
Wellshire Securities GmbH
West Atlantic Credit Group
WESTGATE Financial AG
Westminster Financial Management Ltd
Weyhill Establishments
WFB sro
White Birds Germany GmbH
Whitherspoon, Seymour & Robinson Corp.
Who is Who Prominentenenzyklopädie AG
WIBAG Immobilien und Beteiligung Aktiengesellschaft
Wicon Wirtschafts- und Finanzkontor Betz & Kronacher Beteiligungsgesellschaft
WIETEC-Germany
WIG – Wirtschaftszentrale für Industrie und Gewerbe AG
WIHH – Wirtschaftsinstitut für Industrie, Handel, Handwerk AG
WILL GMBH FINANZBERATUNG & VERWALTUNG
William Smith Partners
Wilton Investment Group
WiRe AG
Wirtschafts- und Finanzberatung Lindow-Giebel
Wirtschaftskanzlei Jilg GmbH
Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft Contor GmbH
WNB Finanzanlagen AG
Wohnbaufinanz
Wohnungsbaugesellschaft Leipzig West AG
Wohnungsbaugesellschaft Leipzig-West AG
Wonsei AG
Woodbridge Business Corp.
World Capital Group
World Capital Holding Corporation
WORLD MEDIA FONDS
World Telecom Data
WorldClearing Holding Inc.
Worldexchange
WorldFX-club
WSR – Whitherspoon, Seymour & Robinson Corporation
Würzburger Aktiengesellschaft für Vermögensbeteiligungen und Verwaltung (WAG)
 X Com Ltd.
Ximex Executive Ltd
XYZ NOMINEES LTD
 Y2M Media Limited
YESILADA BANK LTD.
Young Media Spain S.L.
Yuca Park
 Ziedd
Zeitler
Zürbis
Zimmermann
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
Zimmermann
Zürbis
Zietlow
Zürbis
Zollweg
Zürbis
Zensen-Döring
Z.E.N.I.T. AG
ZAK Inkasso
Zapf Creation
ZBI Zentral Boden Immobilien AG
ZDR-Datenregister GmbH
ZeBo GmbH
ZECH & ZECH VERMÖGENSVERWALTUNG GMBH
Zeder Immobilien Treuhand AG
ZEDER INVESTMENT AG
Zenith Commodities Ltd
ZENKER WOHNBAU AG
Zentrum für Wirtschaftspraxis
Zinnwald Financiers
Zucomex The Zurich Commodities Exchange
Zurich Capital Gruppe
Zurich Direct

Opfer in 2011:

– Angela Merkel

– Wolfgang Schäuble

– Accessio AG

– Allianz Global Investors

– Antek International

– Andreas Decker

– Anna Schwertner

– Bank of America

– Barclays

– Bernd Müller

– Bernd Pulch

– Beluga

– Bliznet Group Inc.

– Centrum Immobilien

– Citigroup

– Coldwell Banker

– Commerzbank

– CPA Capital Partners

– Credit Suisse

– CSA

– CWI

– Debiselect

– D.E.U.S.eG – Jürgen Oswald

– Deutsche Bank

– Deutsche Anstalt für Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht

– DKB Bank

– Dr. Paul Jensen

– Ekrem Redzepagic

– Erste Mai GmbH

– Express Kurier Europa

– Financial Services Regulatory Authority of Frankfurt

– FRONTAL 21

– Garbe

– General Global Media

– Genfer Kreditanstalt

– HCI

– HSBC

– HypoLeasing

– Indara

– JPMorgan Chase

– Kreis Sparkasse Tübingen

– Leipziger Bauträger (etliche Firmen, hier subsummiert)

– Lloyds Bank

– Lothar Berresheim

– Martina Oeder

– Martin Sachs

– Meridian Capital

– Money Pay

– Norinchukin Bank

– Oak Tree

– Prime Estate

– Prosperia Mephisto 1 GmbH & Co KG

– Raiffeisen- und Volksbanken

– Rothmann & Cie.

– Stefan Schramm

– Teldafax

– TipTalk.com

– Wirecard

Natürlich alles OHNE IRGENDEINEN BEWEIS VON VORBESTRAFTEN SERIENBETRÜGERN AUF EINER HOMEPAGE MIT KEINER ECHTEN PERSON IM IMPRESSUM STATTDESSEN MIT EINER NEW YORKER BRIEFKASTENADRESSE IM AUFTRAG MUTMASSLICH VON RA JOCHEN RESCH UND RA MANFRED RESCH, PETER EHLERS UND GERD BENNEWIRTZ -UND UNTER MITARBEIT VON GOOGLE, DEUTSCHLAND,

ALS “FRONTMANN” VON “GOMOPA” AGIERT DER DUTZENDWEISE VORBESTRAFTE KLAUS MAURISCHAT UNTER ANDEREM WEGEN BETRUGES AN SEINEM EIGENEN ANLEGER

Das Urteil gegen„GoMoPa“-Maurischat: Betrug am eigenen Anleger wg € 10.000,-

110401 6 GoMoPa SJB Opferlisteh
Die Verurteilung von Klaus Maurischat und Mark Vornkahl wegen Betruges am eigenen Anleger Klaus Maurischat und Mark Vornkahl, Betreiber vonwww.gomopa.net: Am 24. April 2006 war die Verhandlung am Amtsgericht Krefeld in der Betrugssache: Mark Vornkahl / Klaus Maurischat ./. Dehnfeld. Aktenzeichen: 28 Ls 85/05 Klaus MaurischatLange Straße 3827313 Dörverden.Das in diesem Verfahren ausschließlich diese Betrugsache verhandelt wurde, ist das Urteil gegen Klaus Maurischat recht mäßig ausgefallen.Zusammenfassung der Verhandlung vom 24.04.2006 vor dem Schöffengericht des AG Krefeld in der Sache gegen Klaus Maurischat und Mark Vornkahl.Zur Hauptverhandlung erschienen:Richter Dr. Meister, 2 Schöffen,Staatsanwalt, Angeklagter Klaus Maurischat, vertr. durch RA Meier, Berlin; aus der U-Haft zur Verhandlung überführt.1. Eine Gerichtsvollzieherin stellt unter Ausschuss der Öffentlichkeit eine Urkunde an den Angeklagten Maurischat zu.2. Bei Mark Vornkahl wurde im Gerichtssaal eineTaschenpfändung vorgenommen.Beginn der HauptverhandlungDie Beklagten verzichten auf eine Einlassung zu Beginn.Nach Befragung des Zeugen Denfeld zum Sachverhalt wurde dieVerhandlung auf Wunsch der Staatsanwaltschaft und den Verteidigern unterbrochen.Der Angeklagte Maurischat gab nach Fortsetzung derHauptverhandlung Folgendes zu Protokoll:Er sähe ein, dass das Geld auf das falsche Konto gegangen sei und nicht dem eigentlichen Verwendungszweck zugeführt wurde. Das Geld sei aber zurückgezahlt worden und er distanziere sich ausdrücklich von einem Betrug.Schließung der BeweisaufnahmeDer Staatsanwalt verließt sein PlädoyerEr halte am Vorwurf des Betruges fest. Mit Hinweis auf die einschlägigen Vorstrafen des Angekl. Maurischatund auf laufende Ermittlungsverfahren, beantrage er ein Strafmaß von 1 Jahr und 6 Monaten.Er halte dem Angeklagten zu Gute, dass dieserWiedergutmachung geleistet habe, und dass dieser geständig war. Zudem läge die letzte Verurteilung wegen Betruges 11 Jahre zurück. Auch sei der Geschädigte nicht in existentielle Not geraten, wobei der Staatsanwalt nicht über noch laufende Verfahren hinweg sehen könne. Er läge aber dem Angeklagten Maurischat nahe, keine weiteren Aktivitäten im Bezirk der Staatsanwaltschaft Krefeld auszuüben, insbesondere möchte er, dass keine weiteren Anleger im Bezirk der Staatsanwaltschaft Krefeld durch GoMoPa akquiriert werden.Die Freiheitsstrafe soll zur Bewährung ausgesetzt werden.Plädoyer des Verteidigers des Angekl. Maurischat, Herrn RA MeierEr schließe sich, wie (in der Unterbrechung) vereinbart, dem Staatsanwalt an.Es stimme, dass sein Mandant Fehler in seiner Vergangenheit gemacht habe, und dass er auch diesmal einen Fehler begangen haben könnte, jedoch sei der Hinweis wichtig, dass sein Mandant aus diesen Fehlern gelernt habe.Der Angeklagte haben das letzte Wort.Maurischat sagt, es sei bereits alles gesagt worden.Unterbrechung zu Hauptverhandlung. Der Richter zieht sich mit den Schöffen zur Beratung zurück.Urteilsverkündung:Der Angeklagte wird des gemeinschaftlichen Betrugs für schuldig befunden.Der Angeklagte Klaus Maurischat wird zu einerFreiheitsstrafe von 1 Jahr und 6 Monaten verurteilt. Diese wird zur Bewährung ausgesetzt.Die Bewährungszeit wird auf 3 Jahre festgesetzt.Der Haftbefehl gegen Klaus Maurischat wird aufgehoben.Der Angeklagte trage die Kosten des Verfahrens.UrteilsbegründungDer Richter erklärt, dass eine Täuschung des Geschädigtenvorliegt und somit keine Untreue in Betracht kommen kann.Die Fragen, ob es sich um einen Anlagebetrug handele sei irrelevant. Er hält den Angeklagten die geleistete Wiedergutmachung zu Gute.Ebenso ist das Geständnis für die Angeklagten zu werten. Zudem liegt die letzte Verurteilung des Angeklagten Maurischat 11 Jahre zurück.Die Parteien verzichten auf Rechtsmittel. Das Urteil ist somit rechtskräftig.Mit dem heutigen Urteil endet ein Kapitel in derBetrugssache Goldman Morgenstern & Partners, Klaus Maurischat und Mark Vornkahl.Alle GoMoPa.net Verantwortlichen, Maurischat, Vornkahl und Henneberg sind nun vorbestrafte Abzocker und Betrüger und die Zukunft der Pseudoklitsche GoMoPa.net sieht duster aus.Mir dem Geständnis der beiden ABZOCKER MAURISCHAT UND VORNKAHL vor Gericht bricht ein jahrelangaufrechterhaltenes Lügengeflecht von einigen primitiven Betrügern zusammen. Gewohnheitsverbrecher und Denunzianten,die rechtschaffene Personen und Firmen in ihren Verbrecherforen kriminalisierten.

Original STELLUNGNAHME VON MERIDIAN CAPITAL ZU “GoMoPa”-SERIENBETRÜGERN UND ERPRESSERN

FINANCIAL TIMES ÜBER DIE SERIENBETRÜGER DER FINGIERTEN “GoMoPa”

ftd logo SJB GoMoPa Presse Lounge

Financial Times Deutschland schreibt über Gomopa

_____________________________________

In der Druckversion der FTD erschien am 28.12.2010 dieser Artikel.

Gomopa-Wonach der Markt lechzt

Der Finanznachrichtendienst Gomopa will künftig ein Seriositätsrating von Anbietern am grauen Kapitalmarkt veröffentlichen –dabei ist das Unternehmen selbst umstritten

Bei Beteiligungsmodellen haben Anleger die Qual der Wahl: Sind die tollen Prognosen von Anbieter A glaubwürdig? Oder wäre vielleicht B mit den bodenständigeren Erwartungen vertrauenswürdiger? Es gibt zwar jede Menge Ratings und Siegel, wirklich hilfreich sind viele aber nicht.

Man müsse hinter 95 Prozent der Ratings Gefälligkeitsgutachten vermuten, meint gar Klaus Maurischat, Chef des Finanzinformationsdienstes Goldman Morgenstern & Partners (Gomopa) aus New York, in einem Schreiben an Premiumnutzer seines Dienstes. Schmückende und verkaufsfördernde Ratings oder andere Bewertungen würden von denUnternehmungen bezahlt oder gesponsert, erläutert er. Das führe zu Interessenkonflikten.

Gomopa bereite daher ein Angebot vor, „nach dem der Markt förmlich lechzt“: ein Seriositätsrating, das den Markt revolutionieren und auch noch „mindestens sichere 20% jährliche Rendite an die Gründungsmitglieder“ abwerfen soll. Das System bewerte neutral und unbeeinflussbar „mathematisch, nach festen Algorithmen und Parametern die Seriosität einesUnternehmens und des dahinterstehenden Unternehmers“.

Daraus ergebe sich tabellarisch ein Ranking nach dem Ampelsystem. Das Rating münde in einer Zahl zwischen 100 und 10 000. Sie zeige die Wahrscheinlichkeit eines positiven Geschäftsausgangs mit dem zu bewertenden Anbieter an. Bei 9067 würden zum Beispiel zu 90,67 Prozent „die Aussagen des Anbieters erfüllt werden“.

Beim Rating zählten in erster Linie nachweisbare Leistungen in der Vergangenheit, erläutert Maurischat. Meldungen und Nachrichten würden berücksichtigt und die Werthaltigkeit geprüft. Bei Fondsinhalten sei das nicht nötig. „Die komplizierten Abhandlungen versteht im Endeffekt der eigentliche Verbraucher sowieso nicht“, findet der Gomopa-Chef. Das Rating seimit anerkannten Systemen und Datenbanken wie der Schufa und Google vernetzt. Änderten sich Parameter dort, schlage sich sofort das Ergebnis und Ranking bei Gomopa nieder.

Das wirft allerdings jede Menge Fragen auf. Wie wird etwa die Werthaltigkeit von Informationen bei Google mit einem solchen Ansatz erfasst? Wie geht das System mit neuen Anbietern um oder mit bislang als seriös bekannten Anbietern, die ein offensichtlich schlechtes Produkt auflegen? Maurischat antwortete auf Anfrage, er werde nichts zu internen Geschäftsabläufen mitteilen.

Unter dem Namen Gomopa-Rating soll das Angebot allerdings nicht an den Start gehen, schreibt Maurischat den Nutzern, sondern über eine US-Tochter. Das wiederum ist sehr gut nachvollziehbar. Denn über Goldmann Morgenstern &

Partners selbst gab es in der Vergangenheit auch ziemlich negative Meldungen und Nachrichten. Im Herbst wurde zum Beispiel bekannt, dass sich die Staatsanwaltschaft München für Maurischat und einen Gomopa-Kollegen interessiert, weil der Dienst im Frühjahr falsche Informationen zum TecDAX-Unternehmen Wirecard veröffentlicht hatte und der Aktienkurs abgestürzt war. Bei Gomopa selbst fiele der Seriositätsindex damit wohl nicht so vorteilhaft aus.

STUDIE DER RHEINISCHEN POST u. DES VERLAGS DER DEUTSCHEN WIRTSCHAFT (RENTROP) ZU DEN WIRTSCHAFTSBETÜGERN DER “GoMoPa”

RP_Studie_WiKri-Studie_final

STASI “GoMoPa”: Darum musste Heinz Gerlach sterben – Er war dabei Resch zu enttarnen

„Fakt 1: Peter Ehlers war auf Heinz Gerlachs Beerdigung.  Fakt 2: Wenige Monate vor Gerlachs Tod veranstaltete Ehlers mit Gerlach zusammen ein Seminar. Ein Novum. Fakt 3: Peter Ehlers hatte freien Zugang zu Heinz Gerlach. Fakt 4: Peter Ehlers Vita auf kress.de ist leer und weist keine Biographie auf.

Frage 1: Kommt er aus dem Osten Deutschlands wie Stasi-Obrist Ehrenfried Stelzer ?
Frage 2:Ist Peter Ehlers überhaupt Peter Ehlers ?“fragt Heinz Friedrich, Sprecher der SJB-GoMoPa-Opfer.

Das Stasi-Problem war mit dem Zusammenbruch der DDR
keineswegs beendet. Ehemalige Stasi-Mitarbeiter gelangten nach der
Wende in höchste Positionen. In Brandenburg hatten es sogar mehrere
ehemalige Stasi-Mitarbeiter bis in die aktuelle rot-rote Landesregierung
geschafft, um dort die Regierung zu übernehmen. Auch in Sachsen-
Anhalt könnten nach der Landtagswahl ehemalige Stasi-Mitarbeiter in
die Regierung gelangen. Und auch in der Wirtschaft sind viele Stasi-
Mitarbeiter in hohe Positionen gelangt. So auch der Herr Sievert. Doch
was bezweckte dieser tatsächlich mit der Dioxinvergiftung? Handelte er
wirklich aus Profitgier, oder war die bundesweite Vergiftung eine verspätete
Rache der Stasi gegen den ehemaligen Klassenfeind?

Mit den Methoden der Stasi arbeitet auch der äussert dubiose „Finanz-
NACHRICHTENDIENST“ „GoMoPa“. Bespitzelung, Einschüchterung,
Erpressung, Falschnachrichten, Rufmordmord, Cybermord,
Hacking und wohl auch tatsächlicher Mord gehören zu dem täglichen
Repertoire der serienweise vorbestraften Kriminellen von „GoMoPa“.
Bereits Monate vor seinem Tode war Heinz Gerlach diesem dubiosen
„NACHRICHTENDIENST“ aus Ost-Berlin mit Tarnadresse in New York
und Tarnnamen angeblicher jüdischer Rechtsanwälte auf der Spur. Dabei
setzte er von Anfang an sein Leben aufs Spiel.
Denn er wurde mit Stasi-Methoden ausgespäht, bespitzelt und es
wurden seine Computer gehackt. So hatten die „NACHRICHTENDIENST“-
Aufklärer immer wieder brisantes Material, das sowohl auf der
„GoMoPa“-Webseite erschien (mittlerweile gelöscht) als auch auf der
Gerlach kritisch bis feindlich gesonnenen Webseite Akte-Heinz-Gerlach.
info, deren Verbindungsdaten auffallende Parallen zu dem „GoMoPa”-
Internet-Schattenreich vorweisen.
– Er kannte die kriminelle Vergangenheit der „GoMoPa“-Macher
– Er erkannte die Tarnorganisation in New York
– Er erkannte die mutmassliche Erpressung von Immobilienunternehmen durch die
Konstellation „NACHRICHTENDIENST“ „GoMoPa“ und „Anlegerschutzanwalt“ RA Jochen
Resch.
– Er wusste, dass seine Webseite durch Cyber-Attacken lahm gelegt wurden.
– Er war dabei die Rolle von Ehrenfried Stelzer, dem Top-Stasi-Agenten im Hintergrund
zu entschleiern
– All dies führte wohl zu einem Mordauftrag in klassischer Stasi-Manier mit Dioxin.
– An der Tat massgeblich beteiligt ist mit Sicherheit der vorbestrafte Serienbetrüger und
mutmassliche Stasi-Agent „Siegfried Siewert“ oder auch „Klaus Maurischat“ etc pp.
– Die genauen Tatumstände aufzuklären, ist Sache von BKA, LKA, der Kriminalpolizei
und weiterer Ermittler.
– Aber schon jetzt kann man das Tatszenario erkennen: Auch der Hausarzt von Heinz
Gerlach war wohl misstrauisch, was die Todesursache anbetraf. Er wollte den Totenschein
wohl erst nicht ausstellen mit der Todesursache „natürliche Todesursache.“
– In der Öffentlichkeit indes rollte nach der Todesnachricht das geplante Szenario ab.
Zuerst berichtetet der NACHRICHTENDIENST“ „GoMoPa“ von der Todesursache „Blutvergiftung“
– nur wenige Stunden nach dem Tode von Heinz Gerlach. Woher konnte
der „NACHRICHTENDIENST“ dies wissen ? Darüber gibt es keine Angabe in der numehr
von der Webseite des „NACHRICHTENDIENSTES“ „GoMoPa“ verschwundenen Meldung
vom Tode Heinz Gerlachs.
– Es war auch nicht die Meldung des „NACHRICHTENDIENSTES“ „GoMoPa“, der die
Branche und die Öffentlichkeit von dem angeblich natürlichen Tode Heinz Gerlachs
überzeugte:
Mit zwei Artikel entstand die Legende von der Blutvergiftung von Heinz Gerlach: Derm
heute verschwundenen „GoMoPa“-Artikel, der wenige Stunden nach dem Ableben
„Blutvergiftung“ als Todesursache angab und der zunächst auch von der überaus kritischen
Anti-Gerlach-Webseite Akte-Heinz-Gerlach“ in Zweifel gezogen wurde (Beleg
siehe unten).

Als Heinz Gerlach dann die Zusammenhänge zwischen der mutmasslichen
Erpressung des Berliner Immobilienhauses Estavis und „Go-
MoPa“ bzw Rechtsanwalt Jochen Resch erkannte, wusste er endgültig
zuviel und wurde für die „GoMoPa“-Hintermänner zu einer grossen Gefahr.
Dan wurde offenbar nachgelegt als die Zweifel an der wahren
Todesursache immer lauter wurden:
Zitat:
“14. Juli 2010 – Gerlach und die wahre Todesursache
Der selbst ernannte Anlegerschützer Heinz Gerlach starb an einer
zu spät erkannten Blutvergiftung
Der Mann, der dubiose Finanzsysteme durchschaute, erkannte das
feindliche System im eigenen Körper nicht
Hameln/Oberursel (wbn). Die Szene der Finanzdienstleister und
Anlageberater ist um eine schillernde Figur ärmer. Der Anlegerschützer
Heinz Gerlach ist am vergangenen Samstag in seinem Haus im hessischen
Oberursel gestorben.
In wenigen Wochen wäre er 65 geworden. Gerlach hat mit seiner
Internetseite „Direkter Anlegerschutz“ die Beteiligungsangebote des
Kapitalmarktes bewertet und sich in den 70er Jahren mit dem „Gerlach-
Report“ einen bemerkenswerten Ruf als Brancheninsider erworben. Die
Karriere des Steuergehilfen ist in der Finanzwelt beispiellos. Er hörte
das Gras wachsen – und wieder verwelken. Für die einen war er ein
unbeugsamer Held, für die anderen der Störfaktor schlechthin und erklärtes
ketzerisches Feindbild.
Kein Wunder: Es ging stets um viele Millionen Euro und verdeckte
Interessen. In einem Spiegel-Interview sagte er: „Ich habe hier jeden
Tag ‘Dallas’ oder ‘Denver’“. So kommt es nicht unerwartet, dass sich
jetzt schon Legenden um seinen unerwarteten Tod ranken. Angeblich
habe er sich das Leben genommen, wollen Stimmen aus dem Hintergrund
wissen. Die Wahrheit ist so profan wie traurig: Gerlach, der zu
den Indianern gehörte, die niemals weinen und keinen Schmerz kennen,
starb an den Folgen einer unterschätzten Nagelbettentzündung.
Daraus resultierte eine Blutvergiftung. Dies haben die Weserbergland-
Nachrichten.de aus dem engsten Umfeld des „ältesten Geldanlageschützers“
der Republik erfahren.
Die Sepsis (Blutvergiftung) gilt als der weithin unbekannte und meistunterschätzte
Killer in Deutschland. Diese außer Kontrolle geratene
systemische Entzündungsreaktion auf eine Infektion fordert ebenso
viele Todesopfer wie der Herzinfarkt. Bis zu 50 Prozent der Erkrankten
sterben trotz intensiver Behandlung im Krankenhaus. In Deutschland
erkranken – so die Schätzungen – im Jahr 150.000 Menschen an einer
Sepsis. Gerlach hat komplexe Finanzsysteme durchschaut – den systemisch
angreifenden Feind im eigenen Körper hat er unterschätzt.”
h t t p : / /www.we s e r b e r g l a n d – n a c h r i c h t e n . d e / i n d e x .
php?option=com_content&view=article&id=442:14-juli-2010-gerlachund-
die-wahre-todesursache&catid=1:-weserbergland-nachrichten
Dieser Artikel auf der Webseite der unbedeutenden Provinz-Zeitung
„Weserbergland Nachrichten“, die ein Ex-Stasi-Mann lancierte, beruft
sich auf das „engste Umfeld“ von Heinz Gerlach – ohne auch nur DEN
GERINGSTEN BELEG vorweisen zu können.
Somit wir das Märchen von der angeblichen „Blutvergiftung“ als
Agenda festgelegt.
Einen Tag später, am 15. Juli 2010 übernahm auch die Gerlachkritische
Webseite, deren Veranwortliche weiter im Dunkeln sind, diese
Agenda aufgriff und schrieben:
“Worte über Heinz Gerlach »
15.07.10
Heinz Gerlach: Die Todesursache steht offenbar fest
(Eigener Bericht)
Um Heinz Gerlachs plötzlichen Tod ranken sich diverse Gerüchte.
Die können nun ad acta gelegt werden. Denn die Weserbergland-
Nachrichten haben “aus dem engsten Umfeld” des “selbst ernannten
Anlegerschützers” erfahren, dass Gerlach “an den Folgen einer unterschätzten
Nagelbettentzündung” gestorben ist.
Die norddeutsche Tageszeitung schreibt weiter: “Daraus resultierte
eine Blutvergiftung.” An einer Sepsis sterben demnach jedes Jahr
genauso viele Menschen wie an einem Herzinfarkt.
Heinz Gerlach soll am Dienstag beerdigt werden.
Den Artikel im Original finden Sie hier: http://www.
we s e rbe rgl and-na chr i cht en.de / inde x .php? opt i on=c om_
content&view=article&id=442:14-juli-2010-gerlach-und-die-wahretodesursache&
catid=1:-weserbergland-nachrichten”
Ohne EIGENE RECHERCHE-und ohne den geringsten Beleg übernahmen
diese „INSIDER“ das Blutvergiftungs-Märchen.
Hinzu kommt die Internetseite http://www.akte-heinz-gerlach.
info/15-07-10-heinz-gerlach-die-todesursache-steht-offenbar-fest/ und
die Webseiten die „GoMoPa“ zuzuordnen sind, weisen auffallende Paralleln
auf.
Die Verbindungsdaten der Akte-Heinz-Gerklach.Info, gehostet in
der anatolische Internet-Klitsche Media-on sowie die der „GoMoPa“ und
deren Hintermänner .:
Godaddy ist der Haus-Hoster von ‘Gomopa’ und seit vielen
Jahren der Registrar der ‘Gomopa’-Homepage. Hier werden auch
zahlreiche ‘Gomopa’ zuzuordnende ‘Foren’ und ‘Blogs’ zugeordnet,
in denen fiktive Cyber-Aliasse ihr Unwesen treiben, das natürlich nie
mit Fakten belegt ist wie z.b. extremnews.com.
Registrant: Goldman Morgenstern an Partners LLC
Registered through: GoDaddy.com, Inc. (http://www.godaddy.
com)
Domain Name: GOMOPA.NET
Gehostet hier:
Server IP: 67.23.163.233 Server Location: Lockport, NY, 14094,
United States
Gomopa IP: 67.23.163.230 Gomopa server location: Asheville in
United States Gomopa ISP: Netriplex LLC
Pikant auch die Internetseite der immer wieder mit Gomopa in
Verbindung gebrachten Offshore-Firma Baker & Baker, Köln, wird
bei Godaddy gehostet.
Server IP: 208.109.181.34 Server Location: Scottsdale, AZ,
85260, United States
Von gekaperten Godaddy-IP-Adressen wurden und werden
auch zahlreiche Flooding-Angriffe geführt bzw. sogenannte Stalking-
Seiten gehostet, die so die Opfer eine Spezialität von Klaus
Maurischat seien.
Die Baker & Baker wurde bereits in der Schweiz wegen Vermögenslosigkeit
liquidiert. Siehe http://www.yasni.de/baker+offshore/
person+information und http://www.moneyhouse.ch/en/u/baker_
baker_consulting_group_ag_CH-170.3.014 .447-7.htm
Dieser Firma war Heinz Gerlach ein besonderes Dorn im Auge
Server IP: 95.0.239.251
Domain ID:D28959891-LRMS
Domain Name:AKTE-HEINZ-GERLACH.INFO
Created On:03-Jul-2009 08:59:55 UTC
Last Updated On:10-May-2010 18:16:59 UTC
Expiration Date:03-Jul-2011 08:59:55 UTC
Sponsoring Registrar:Alantron BLTD (R322-
LRMS)
Status:OK
Registrant ID:DI_11637039
Registrant Name:Linh Wang
Registrant Organization:Linh Wang1273487281
Registrant Street1:3617 Tower 1 Lippo Centre
Registrant Street2:
Registrant Street3:
Registrant City:Hong Kong
Registrant State/Province:Queensway
Registrant Postal Code:0000089
Registrant Country:HK
Registrant Phone:+000.5230064510
Registrant Phone Ext.:
Registrant FAX:+000.5230064510
Registrant FAX Ext.:
Registrant Email: info@xchiang.com

wie man bei Durchsicht der Seite http://www.akte-heinz-gerlach.info unschwer
erkennen kann. Es geht und ging dabei um die Patenschaft
im grauen Markt der Kapitalanlagen.
Drehsscheibe Mediaon.com Eine wesentliche Rolle bei den illegalen
Offshore-Internet-Aktivitäten der Cyber-Kriminellen spielt
auch die Briefkastenfirma Linh Wang, Honkong, bei der die Seite
http://www.akte-heinz-gerlach.info registriert wurde, die bei dem dubiosen
Undergrund-Unternehmen Mediaon.com in der Türkei gehostet
wird, so die Opfer. Über diese Schiene wurden Dutzende
betrügerischer Erpresser-Sites der Cyber-Kriminellen registriert.
Admin ID:DI_11637039
Admin Name:Linh Wang
Admin Organization:Linh Wang1273487281
Admin Street1:3617 Tower 1 Lippo Centre
Admin Street2:
Admin Street3:
Admin City:Hong Kong
Admin State/Province:Queensway
Admin Postal Code:0000089
Admin Country:HK
Admin Phone:+000.5230064510
Admin Phone Ext.:
Admin FAX:+000.5230064510
Admin FAX Ext.:
Admin Email: info@xchiang.com
Billing ID:DI_11637040
Billing Name:Tuce Kuyumcu
Billing Organization:Tuce Kuyumcu1273487281
Billing Street1:Market Street 45a
Billing Street2:
Billing Street3:
Billing City:Baidoa
Billing State/Province:Victoria Mahe Seychelles
Billing Postal Code:00000
Billing Country:HK
Billing Phone:+000.4834433490
Billing Phone Ext.:
Billing FAX:+000.4834433491
Billing FAX Ext.:
Billing Email: tuce.kuyumcu@somali.com
Tech ID:DI_11637040
Tech Name:Tuce Kuyumcu
Tech Organization:Tuce Kuyumcu1273487281
Tech Street1:Market Street 45a
Tech Street2:
Tech Street3:
Tech City:Baidoa
Tech State/Province:Victoria Mahe Seychelles
Tech Postal Code:00000
Tech Country:HK
Tech Phone:+000.4834433490
Tech Phone Ext.:
Tech FAX:+000.4834433491
Tech FAX Ext.:
Tech Email: tuce.kuyumcu@somali.com
Name Server:NS1.ANADOLUDNS.COM
Name Server:NS2.ANADOLUDNS.COM
Hier der Beleg über das Hosting der Anti-Gerlach-
Seite, AKTE-HEINZ-GERLACH.INFO, bei dem
Untergrund-Unternehmen Mediaon.com in der
Türkei gehostet: Linh Wang
Domain ID:D28959891-LRMS
Domain Name:AKTE-HEINZ-GERLACH.INFO
Created On:03-Jul-2009 08:59:55 UTC
Last Updated On:10-May-2010 18:16:59 UTC
Expiration Date:03-Jul-2011 08:59:55 UTC
Sponsoring Registrar:Alantron BLTD (R32
Mediaon Title: Anonymous Hosting – Privacy
Hosting – MediaOn.com is leading the marked in
privacy hosting.
Mediaon Keywords: Anonymous hosting, Whois
Protection, Whois privacy services, Privacy Hosting,
anonymous domain registration, managed
vps
Mediaon Description: MediaOn.com is leading in
anonymous hosting and privacy hosting.
Mediaon IP: 95.0.153.245 Mediaon server location:
Turkey Mediaon ISP: Turk Telekom IP:
95.0.153.245 IP Country: Turkey This IP address
resolves to dsl9539413.ttnet.net.tr
Idari Yonetici / Registrant (Admin) Ad / Name
Tekin Karaboga Adres Catalca Yolu Menekse Mevkii
Istanbul 34537 Tel +90.212.8656520

Diese Internet-Operations-Muster – so die SJB-Opfer – habe
es in Ihrem Falle, aber auch bei zahlreichen anderen Betrugs-, Erpressungs-
und Verleumdungsopfer in den letzten Jahren gegeben.
Nunmehr liegen und auch des heimtückischen Cyber-Mordes an
Heinz Gerlach können ermittelt werden’, so Heinz. F., Mayen, Sprecher
der Opfer (die Personen-Daten wurden aus Sicherheitsgründen
anonimysiert).
Wenn das BKA, LK, FBI und die Kriminalpolizei diesen Spuren
weiter intensiv nachgehen würden, seien die sowieso laufenden Ermittlungen
in zahlreichen Fällen wie auch im Kursmanipulationsfall
‘Wirecard’ von Erfolg gekrönt. Denn große Firmen wie Godaddy und
auch Enom, für die der Reseller Arvixe Domains verkauft, könnten
sich anders als ‘dubiose türkische Untergrund-Internet-Klitschen’ –
dem Zugriff der Justiz nicht entziehen.
„Neue Erkenntnisse in der Affäre Resch/GoMoPa-Stasi haben
wir recherchiert“, erläutert SJB.-GoMoPa-Sprecher Heinz Friedrich.
„Neben dem Stasi-Agenten und früheren Leiter der Kriminologie
an der Ost-Berliner Humboldt-Universität hat Rechtsanwalt Jochen
Resch den sogenannten „Wirtschaftsdetektiv“ Medard Fuchsgruber
(Photo oben) als Protege´ gefördert.
Fuchsgruber spielte eine besonders dubiose Rolle in den letzten
Tagen und Wochen vor dem Tode von Heinz Gerlach. Er sollte im
Auftrag der von „GoMoPa“ erpressten Kasseler Firma Immovation
AG Erkennntnisse über „GoMoPa“ sammeln und diese auch dem
„GoMoPa“-Kritiker Heinz Gerlach zur Verfügung stellen. Er hatte
jederzeit freien Zugang zu Heinz Gerlach und dessen Privaträumen.
8. Juli 2009 … Der Wirtschaftsdetektiv Medard Fuchsgruber
soll zum neuen Geschäftsführer des Deutschen Instituts für Anlegerschutz
(DIAS) gewählt werden“, meldete http://www.anlegerschutz.
tv/
Zwei Tage später starb Heinz Gerlach.
Am 10. Juli 2010 starb Heinz Gerlach angeblich an „Blutvergiftung“.
GoMoPa brachte die Meldung nur wenige Stunden nach dem
Ableben – mit der Todesursache „Blutvergiftung“ – diese Todesursache
kann sehr leicht und sher schnell durch Dioxinvergiftung herbeigeführt
werden. Diese „Pressemeldung“ ist inzwischen von der
Webseite der „GoMoPa“ verwschwunden.
Aber auch andere Insider, ausser uns haben sie gesehen:
Siehe hier in der Akte Heinz Gerlach::

„Zum Tode von Heinz Gerlach »
11.07.10 Sondermeldung
HEINZ GERLACH VERSTORBEN
(Eigener Bericht)
Heinz Gerlach ist tot. Am Sonnabend Abend ist der äußerst umstrittene
“Anlegerschützer” in Oberursel verstorben. Das vermeldet
der Finanzmarketingberater Michael Oehme in einem Rundbrief.
Heinz Gerlach wäre am 9. August 65 Jahre alt geworden.
Auf den Internetseiten der Heinz Gerlach Medien eK ist bislang
keine Bestätigung für diese Nachricht zu erhalten.
Die Todesumstände sind völlig unklar. Der Finanznachrichtendienst
Gomopa spekuliert, Gerlach sei einer Blutvergiftung erlegen.
Bei allen kritikwürdigen Geschäftsmethoden war Heinz Gerlach
ein Mensch, der eine Familie hinterlässt. Unser Mitgefühl gilt seinen
Angehörigen.
Wie und ob unsere Berichterstattung weitergeht, hängt davon
ab, auf welche Weise die Geschäfte des Unternehmens nach Heinz
Gerlachs Tod geführt werden.
Bereits vorbereitete Artikel und Enthüllungen werden wir aus
Pietät zunächst nicht veröffentlichen.“

http://www.akte-heinz-gerlach.info/11-07-10-sondermeldungheinz-

gerlach-verstorben/ (noch ist der Link verfügbar)
Während selbst die Gerlach-kritische Akte schreibt „die Todesursache
ist noch völlig unklar“, WEISS „GoMoPa“ BEREITS ZU
DIESEM ZEITPUNKT; das die ANGEBLICHE TODESURSACHE EINE
BLUTVERGIFTUNG WAR.
Von da an nahm die Legende ihren Lauf – über hessische Weserbergland-
Nachrichten, die keine Quelle angaben.
Wir erinnern uns, das Pseudonym von Klaus Maurischat (dessen
Lebenslauf und Identität wohl gefälscht sein dürften), ist Siegfried
Siewert. Siegfried Sievert ist ein ehemaliger Stasi-Agent und nunmehr
für den DIOXIN-Skandal verantwortlich.
Er gab zu im Auftrag der Stasi, BLUTFETT-VERSUCHE vorgenommen
zu haben.
“Dieser Kerl panschte Gift-Fett in unser Essen”, titelt die Bild-
Zeitung über den Chef des Futtermittelherstellers Harles & Jentzsch

aus Uetersen (Kreis Pinneberg). Gemeint ist Siegfried Sievert, 58
Jahre alt. Wer ist der Mann, der für einen der größten Lebensmittelskandale
Deutschlands verantwortlich sein könnte?
Der Unternehmer lebt in einer Villa in Kiebitzreihe (Kreis Steinburg)
und ist seit 16 Jahren bei Harles & Jentzsch in leitender Position
tätig. Seit 2005 ist er alleinvertretungsberechtigter Geschäftsführer.
Als nach dem Dioxinfund klar wurde, dass die verseuchte
Mischfettsäure nur für technische Zwecke verwendet werden darf,
erklärte Sievert: “Wir waren leichtfertig der irrigen Annahme, dass
die Mischfettsäure, die bei der Herstellung von Biodiesel aus Palm-,
Soja- und Rapsöl anfällt, für die Futtermittelherstellung geeignet
ist.”
Sievert hat sich für Qualitätsstandards stark gemacht
Diese Aussage erstaunt Branchenexperten, die mit Sievert gearbeitet
haben. Christof Buchholz ist Geschäftsführer des Deutschen
Verbands des Großhandels mit Ölen, Fetten und Ölrohstoffen (Grofor),
in dem 120 Unternehmen organisiert sind, darunter auch
Harles & Jentzsch. Buchholz sagt: “Ich kenne Herrn Sievert gut.
Er hat sich seit Jahren für hohe Qualitätsstandards stark gemacht,
insbesondere für das holländische System.” Dabei würden akribisch
all jene Gefahren aufgelistet, die eine mechanische oder chemische
Verunreinigung verursachen könnten – und Standards für die sichere
Produktion von Futtermitteln definiert.
Sievert dürfte demnach ein Experte für eine saubere Futtermittelproduktion
sein. Er besuchte auch die jährlichen Grofor-Treffen,
bei denen sich Experten aus ganz Europa austauschen. Wie
glaubwürdig ist dann seine Aussage, er habe angenommen, die
Mischfettsäure verwenden zu dürfen – zumal der niederländische
Lieferant Petrotec AG in Verträgen, Lieferscheinen und Rechnungen
darauf hingewiesen haben will, dass diese billigere Fettsäure ausschließlich
zur technischen Verwendung bestimmt sei?
“Wir können das nicht nachvollziehen”
Christof Buchholz: “Bei uns war die Überraschung groß. Es ist
ein No-go für Futtermittelhersteller, technische Mischfettsäuren zu
verwenden. Wir können das nicht nachvollziehen.” Er habe deshalb
Siegfried Sievert angerufen. “Wir haben ein kurzes Gespräch geführt.
Herr Sievert war verzweifelt und erklärte auch mir, dass er
dachte, das sei in Ordnung.” Während des Telefonats sei zudem
besprochen worden, woher die Dioxine gekommen sein könnten.
Christof Buchholz: “Herr Sievert wusste darauf keine Antwort und
klagte, dass es so viele Fragezeichen gebe.”
Seine erste Aussage hat er mittlerweile revidiert. Dem niedersächsischen
Agrarministerium teilte Harles & Jentzsch jetzt mit, das

dioxinverseuchte Industriefett sei versehentlich in die Produktion
gelangt. Ministeriumssprecher Gert Hahne: “Die Darstellung, da
hat einer den falschen Hahn aufgedreht, erscheint uns sehr unglaubwürdig.”
Sievert drohen drei Jahre Gefängnis
Die Staatsanwaltschaft Itzehoe ermittelt wegen des Verdachts
einer vorsätzlichen Straftat gegen Siegfried Sievert. Ihm drohen
wegen Verunreinigung von Lebens- und Futtermitteln bis zu drei
Jahren Gefängnis oder eine Geldstrafe. Außerdem droht eine Prozess-
Lawine. Auf was dürfen Landwirte hoffen, die auf Schadensersatz
klagen?
Die Harles & Jentzsch GmbH ist im Mai 1980 in Pinneberg gegründet
worden, zog 1994 nach Uetersen. Im Handelsregister gibt das
Unternehmen als Geschäftszweck an: Handel und Veredelung, Im-
und Export von Ölen, Fetten, Fettsäuren und deren Derivaten. Unter
dem Markennamen “Hajenol” verkauft Harles & Jentzsch Futterfett
für Rinder, Schweine, Geflügel und Legehennen, produziert aber
auch Industriefette für die Papierverarbeitung. Das Stammkapital
der GmbH betrug 1994 genau 537 800 Mark. Diese Summe scheint
zwischenzeitlich nicht erhöht worden zu sein, obwohl der Jahresumsatz
des Zwölf-Mann-Betriebs zuletzt 20 Millionen Euro betrug.
Sollte Harles & Jentzsch vorsätzlich gehandelt haben, wird die
Betriebshaftpflichtversicherung nicht einspringen. Der Bauernverband
geht von einem Millionenschaden aus. Es geht um mehr
als 1000 Landwirte, die ihre Höfe schließen mussten und deren
Tiere teilweise verbrannt werden. Als Entschädigung wird das
Stammkapital und selbst das Gesellschaftsvermögen nicht reichen.
Dem Vertriebschef der Firma zufolge soll am Donnerstag eine Bestandsaufnahme
erfolgen. Danach werde entschieden, ob Insolvenz
angemeldet werde. Gegen Sievert und seine Mitarbeiter hat es derweil
Morddrohungen gegeben. Am Telefon seien Mitarbeiter mit den
Worten “Wir machen euch fertig” bedroht worden, so Sievert.
Bild schreibt: –„ Die Akte trägt die Registriernummer II 153/71,
ist mehrere Hundert Seiten dick. Auf dem Deckel – in feiner Schreibschrift
– ein Name: „Pluto“. Unter diesem Decknamen spionierte
Siegfried Sievert (58) 18 Jahre lang für die Staatssicherheit der
DDR – der Futtermittelpanscher, der mutmaßlich für den deutschen
Dioxin-Skandal verantwortlich ist!
Auf Antrag von BILD gab die zuständige Birthler-Behörde die
Unterlagen jetzt heraus. Die Dokumente zeichnen das Bild eines
Mannes, der rücksichtslos ist, skrupellos und vor allem auf eigenen
Profit bedacht.
Rückblick. 1971 wird die Stasi auf den 18-jährigen Sievert

aufmerksam. Sie beobachtet sein „dekadentes Aussehen“, seine
hohe Intelligenz und seine „guten Verbindungen zu anderen jugendlichen
Personenkreisen“. Sievert wird angeworben. Aus einem
Bericht vom 16. März 1971: „Der Kandidat kann zur Absicherung
der Jugend (…) eingesetzt werden.“
Sievert wählt seinen Decknamen selbst, kassiert fortan Prämien
für seine „inoffizielle Mitarbeit“. In den Unterlagen finden sich zahlreiche
Quittungen, eine vom 6. November 1987: „Hiermit bescheinige
ich den Erhalt von 100 Mark für geleistete Arbeit.“
Nach dem Abitur studiert Sievert in Greifswald Physik. Er macht
Karriere, wird Geschäftsführer für „Absatz und Beschaffung“ in der
„Märkischen Ölmühle“ in Wittenberge (Brandenburg).
Eifrig spitzelt Sievert weiter, berichtet über intime Verhältnisse
seiner Kollegen.
So notiert „IM-Pluto“ am 25. September 1986: „Die beiden
beabsichtigen, gemeinsam die BRD zu besuchen.“ Zwei Kollegen
hätten angegeben, von einem Freund eingeladen worden zu sein.
„Fakt ist jedoch, daß zwischen dem Kollegen und der Kollegin seit
langer Zeit Intimbeziehungen bestehen. (…) Aus dieser Tatsache
ist abzuleiten, daß eine gemeinsame Reise in die BRD mit hoher
Wahrscheinlichkeit für eine Flucht benutzt wird.“
Skrupel zeigte Sievert laut Stasi-Akte keine. Ein Führungsoffizier
notiert: „Der IM hatte keinerlei Vorbehalte bei der Belastung von
Personen aus seinem Umgangskreis.“
Nach dem Mauerfall verlässt Sievert die Ölmühle. Ehemalige
Kollegen wundern sich über seinen Wohlstand, werfen ihm vor, er
habe Lieferungen der Ölmühle unterschlagen, dafür unter der Hand
kassiert. Ein Vorwurf, für den es derzeit keine Belege gibt.
1993 steigt Sievert beim Futtermittelhersteller „Harles & Jentzsch“
ein. 2005 wird er alleiniger Geschäftsführer, steigert in nur
fünf Jahren den Umsatz von 4,3 auf rund 20 Millionen Euro, vervierfacht
den Gewinn. Ein Futtermittelmischer aus Niedersachsen zu
BILD: „Solch ein Wachstum ist mit normalen Methoden unmöglich.“
Mit Panscherei möglicherweise schon: Das dioxinverseuchte
Tierfutter von „Harles & Jentzsch“ war durch das Einmischen von
Industriefetten entstanden. Die sind deutlich billiger als Futterfette.
Allein im November und Dezember 2010 soll Sieverts Firma
mindestens 3000 Tonnen verseuchtes Futterfett verarbeitet haben.

Etwa 150 000 Tonnen belastetes Futter könnten so in die Nahrungskette
gelangt sein.
Martin Hofstetter, Agrarexperte von Greenpeace zu BILD:
„Wenn man sich die Zahlen von ,Harles & Jentzsch‘ anschaut und
die bisherigen Erkenntnisse und Veröffentlichungen berücksichtigt,
kann man eigentlich nur zu einem Schluss kommen: Hier wurde
systematisch betrogen und gepanscht.“
UND: Stasi-Top-Agent Ehrenfried Stelzer war auch Professor für
Kriminologie an der Berliner Humboldt-Universität zu SED-Zeiten.
SJB-GoMoPa-Sprecher Heinz Friedrich kommentiert: „Der Verdacht
liegt nahe, dass hier eine Verschwörung zum Tode von Heinz
Gerlach geführt hat, der dieser Gruppierung im Wege stand. Auch
wir und unsere Angehörigen wurden mit Stas-Methoden bedroht
und eingeschüchtert.“ Und fügt er hinzu: „Wie das Dioxin in die
Blutbahn von Heinz Gerlach kam, werden diese Stas-Agenten und
ihre Mitverschwörer wohl wissen.“
Nach dem Tode von Gerlach wechelte Fuchsgruber endgültig
und offen die Seiten in das „GoMoPa“-Team und sollte auch als
DIAS-Geschäftsführer den Stasi-Agenten Ehrenfried Stelzer ablösen
– auf Betreiben des „Anlegerschutz“-Anwaltes RA Jochen Resch
(siehe unten).
Nachstehende Erklärung publizierte dann Immovation AG:
„Nach den höchsterfreulichen gerichtlichen Erfolgen gegen den
u. a. von rechtskräftig verurteilten Betrügern betriebenen, im Ausland
domizilierten “Informationsdienst” Gomopa geht die Kasseler
IMMOVATION Immobilien Handels AG auch straf- und zivilrechtlich
gegen den Wirtschaftsdetektiv Medard Fuchsgruber vor.
Dieser hatte den IMMOVATION-Vorständen Lars Bergmann und
Matthias Adamietz im Frühjahr 2010 angeboten, unwahre, diffamierende
Veröffentlichungen auf der Website der gomopa.net beseitigen
zu lassen und weitere rechtswidrige Veröffentlichungen dieser
Art zu verhindern. Diese beauftragten Medard Fuchsgruber entsprechend
und entrichteten ein Honorar von insgesamt EUR 67.500,00.
Entgegen allen Zusagen von Fuchsgruber erfolgen über Gomopa
jedoch – insbesondere seit Juli diesen Jahres – weiterhin schwer
diffamierende Veröffentlichungen, gegen deren wesentlichste das
traditionsreiche Kasseler Unternehmen in der Zwischenzeit bereits
vor Gericht eine einstweilige Verfügung durchsetzen konnte (LG
Berlin; Az.: 27 O 658/10).

Fuchsgruber ist – nach Entgegennahme des Vorabhonorars –
offenbar seit Juni selbst “Kooperationspartner” bei Gomopa und
wirbt sogar mit dieser Funktion, auch bei Gomopa wird das Engagement
Fuchsgrubers besonders willkommen geheißen. Nach Auffassung
der IMMOVATION hat Fuchsgruber damit von Beginn an über
sein beabsichtigtes Engagement für die IMMOVATION getäuscht,
was das Unternehmen im Rahmen einer Strafanzeige und eines
Strafantrags inzwischen von der zuständigen Staatsanwaltschaft
überprüfen lässt. Zudem hat die IMMOVATION das vorab bezahlte
Honorar zurückgefordert und wird erforderlichenfalls den zivilrechtlichen
Klageweg beschreiten.
Absurde Erklärungsversuche
Die von Fuchsgruber offenkundig in Journalisten- und Branchenkreisen
zirkulierte Einschätzung, er hätte auftragsgemäß für IMMOVATION
gehandelt, zielt völlig ins Leere: Denn nach seinem Einstieg
bei Gomopa haben die über einen Serverstandort im Ausland
verbreiteten Schmähungen nachweislich sogar zugenommen. Und
schließlich: Selbst wenn dem so wäre, wie ließe sich dann der Umstand
erklären, dass Fuchsgruber weiterhin als “Kooperationsparter”
bei Gomopa fungiert, wenn doch nun für Gomopa öffentlich
bekannt ist, dass Fuchsgruber im Auftrag der diffamierten IMMOVATION
aktiv werden sollte?
Eine unmittelbare Beendigung der Zusammenarbeit Fuchsgruber
und Gomopa wäre daher die logische Konsequenz, die jedoch
bezeichnenderweise bis heute offenkundig ausgeblieben ist, was
den von der IMMOVATION erhobenen Vorwurf weiter untermauert.
Bemerkenswert ist darüber hinaus, dass sich der Einstieg Fuchsgrubers
beim “Informationsdienst” Gomopa laut Medienberichten in
enger zeitlicher Nähe zum Scheitern Fuchsgrubers beim Deutschen
Institut für Anlegerschutz (DIAS) vollzog.“
Und im November 2010 durfte Fuchgruber dann auf der
„GoMoPa“-Webseite für sich werben:

http://www.gomopa.net/Pressemitteilungen.html?id=603&me

ldung=Wucherbeitraege-Medard-Fuchsgruber-gruendete-Aktionsgemeinschaft-
fuer-Versicherte#thumb (Noch ist der Link da)
Hintergrund:
Der Beleg, wie eng „GoMoPa“ und der laut den SJB-GoMoPa-
Opfern hinter „GoMoPa“ stehende Rechtsanwalt Resch stehen,
lesen Sie nachfolgend. Und: RA Resch fördert einen Ex-STASIHauptmann:
Zitat:
„GoMoPa: Warum haben Sie ausgerechnet einen Stasi-Oberst
und zudem noch hochbetagt, nämlich Ehrenfried Stelzer (78), als
Nachfolger von Pietsch bei DIAS eingesetzt?
Resch: “Der Verein stand ohne Geschäftsführer da. Stelzer war
der einzige, der Zeit hatte. Alle im Verein haben gesagt, 20 Jahre
nach der Wende ist die Stasizeit nicht mehr so wichtig. Schließlich
war Stelzer Professor für Kriminalistik an der Humboldt-Uni. Aber im
Nachhinein war das kein so kluger Zug.”
GoMoPa: Stelzer wurde inzwischen von Wirtschaftsdetektiv
Medard Fuchsgruber abgelöst, der nach eigenen Worten die aggressive
Verfolgung von Kapitalmarktverbrechen fortsetzen will. Der
Verein soll künftig von mehreren Rechtsanwälten bezahlt werden.“
Zitatende
Mehr unter http://www.sjb-fonds-opfer.com
Ausgrechnet der dubiose Detektiv Fuchsgruber, der die Seiten
von Immovation AG hin zu „GoMoPa“ wechelt ist also ein Resch-
Protege´.
Und: Fuchsgruber bemühte sich nachweislich um Gerlachs Archiv
in der Insolvenzmasse. Und: er hatte freien Zugang zu Heinz
Gerlachs Privaträumen.
Und: Fuchsgruber wechselte erst OFFIZIELL nach Heinz Gerlachs
für alle überraschenden Tod zu „GoMoPa“ und wurde ein
Protege´von Resch.
Und: Das Pseudonym von Klaus Maurischat „Siegfried Siewert“
ist ein Anagramm des Namen des früheren Stasi-Agenten und Dioxin
Panschers Siegfried Sievers.
Und: Die Stasi führte Menschenversuche mit Dioxin durch.
Alles Zufälle ? Rein statistisch gesehen wohl kaum.
Dazu passt, dass diese Gruppierung die Publikation dieser Fakten
mit allen Umständen verhindern will. Sie werden wissen weshalb…
Beispiel GMAC:
Laut den SJB-GoMoPa-Opfern versuchte GoMoPa wohl im
Auftrag von Resch die General Motors-Tochter GMAC zu erpressen.
Zitata aus „GoMoPa“: Der Berliner Anlegerschutzanwalt Jochen
Resch, der zahlreiche Käufer von GMAC-RFC-finanzierten Wohnungen
vertritt, sagte dem Finanznachrichtendienst GoMoPa.net: “Anfangs
wurde das Fünffache, später sogar das Siebenfache des Nettoverdienstes
eines Kreditnehmers als Kredit vergeben. Wer also
40.000 Euro netto im Jahr verdiente, bekam einen Kredit bis zu
280.000 Euro, obwohl, wie sich nach Überprüfung herausstellt, die
Immobilie nur 140.000 Euro wert war.
Dazu genügte eine Anmeldung beim Internet-Vermittler Creditweb,
und die Kredite wurden bei entsprechender Verdienstbescheinigung
im Eiltempo durchgewunken.
Was die Wohnung wirklich wert war, war nicht mehr das Problem
von GMAC-RFC . Denn sie verschnürte die Wohnungen zu Paketen
von 500 Millionen Euro und verkaufte die Pakete zur Refinanzierung
nach Holland.
Nutzniesser der Baufilligenz der GMAC-RFC waren aber nicht
die Käufer, die mit dem Kredit über dreißig Jahre eine überteuerte
Wohnung abzahlen. Nutzniesser waren die Verkäufer und Vermittler,
die 50 Prozent auf den wahren Verkehrswert der Wohnung
draufgeschlagen hatten.
Für die Vermittler von Wohnungsfinanzierungen begann ein
wahres Schlaraffenland
Anlegerschutzanwalt Resch beschreibt den Aufstieg der Ami-
Bank so: “Vertriebsorganisationen sahen die große Chance, ihren
bei anderen Banken nur schwer finanzierbaren Kunden einen Kredit
zu vermitteln. Für den Vertrieb der entscheidende Vorteil. Nur wenn
Geld fließt, fließen auch die Provisionen. Bis zu 35 Prozent des Kaufpreises.
Dieses attraktive Angebot ließ die GMAC-RFC Bank innerhalb
kurzer Zeit zu einem ernsthaften Konkurrenten für die übrigen fi-
nanzierenden Banken auf dem Schrottimmobilienmarkt aufsteigen.
Innerhalb kurzer Zeit erreichte die GMAC-RFC Bank deshalb ein
Gesamtkreditvolumen von mehr als zwei Milliarden Euro.
Der Grund für die großzügige Kreditgewährung dürfte gewesen
sein, dass die GMAC-RFC Bank das Risiko verkaufte. Sie wollte von
vornherein die Kredite nicht behalten. Sie schnürte große Kreditpakete
und verkaufte diese an holländische Zweckgesellschaften.
Die GMAC-RFC wurde schnell zum heißen Tipp auf dem Immobilienmarkt.
Denn Verkäufer und Vermittler bekamen sogar Antrag-
steller ohne Eigenkapital durch, die bei jeder anderen Bank durchgefallen
wären.”
Die GMAC-RFC Bank feierte sich in einer Pressemitteilung vom
Januar 2007 wie folgt: „Mit Einführung der neuen Baufilligenz® –
einer Produktinnovation, mit der erstmals in Deutschland standardisierte
Vollfinanzierungen für Eigennutzer und Kapitalanleger bis zu
110 Prozent des Kaufpreises angeboten werden – haben wir nicht
nur innerhalb kurzer Zeit die Produktführerschaft erreicht, sie zeichnet
auch als Wachstumstreiber für die Verdoppelung des Neugeschäftes
gegenüber 2005 verantwortlich.“
Im September 2008 war das Innovations-Konzept der GMAC
sowohl in den USA als auch in Deutschland gescheitert. Die GMACRFC
vergibt seitdem keine Hypothekendarlehen mehr.
Anlegerschutzanwalt Resch: “Zum 30. September 2008 gab die
GMAC-RFC Bank ihre Lizenz zurück. Es wurde den Kunden mitgeteilt,
dass alles beim Alten bleibe. Die GMAC-RFC Servicing GmbH
werde jetzt die Kunden weiter betreuen.
Schon damals entstanden jedoch Zweifel, ob dieses Angebot
ernst gemeint war. Wir hatten befürchtet, dass sich die Konditionen
bei der Prolongation des Darlehens verschlechtern würden.”
Die Befürchtungen bestätigt die GMAC-RFC indirekt in ihrem
Rundbrief vom 23. September 2010. Der Vorteil einer Umschuldung
auf eine andere Bank sei die Möglichkeit einer „besseren Zinskondition“.
Theoretisch dürfte die GMAC-RFC damit recht haben. Praktisch
wird es allerdings dazu führen, dass die GMAC-RFC Darlehensnehmer
bei dem Versuch einer Umschuldung bemerken werden, dass sie
wohl keine einzige Bank finden werden, die in das Risiko einsteigt.
Es wird offenbar werden, dass viele Anleger nur durch das institutionelle
Zusammenwirken zwischen Vertrieb, Verkäufer und
GMAC-RFC Bank einen Kredit bekommen hatten.
Es wird offenbar werden, dass die Hausbank des Kunden die
Umschuldung nur bei Stellung weiterer Sicherheiten vornehmen
wird.
Es wird offenbar werden, dass vielfach die Wohnung sittenwidrig
überteuert ist. Sie bringt beim Weiterverkauf nicht einmal die
Hälfte dessen, was die GMAC-RFC Bank finanziert hat.
Das einzig Gute ist, dass viele ahnungslose Anleger beim Versuch
einer Umschuldung bemerken, was ihnen seinerzeit angetan
wurde.”
GoMoPa.net schickte der GMAC-RFC Servicing GmbH folgende
Fragen:
1) Ist es richtig, dass dieses Angebot zur Umschuldung damit
zusammenhängt, dass die zur Refinanzierung an holländische
Zweckgesellschaften verkauften Kredite nur unzureichend bedient
werden und durch die Umschuldung die Rückzahlung und die
Zinszahlungen für die Anleihen der Zweckgesellschaften gesichert
werden müssen?
2) Ist es richtig, dass die GMAC-RFC Bank seit ihrem Auftreten
auf dem deutschen Immobilienmarkt im Jahr 2004 ein Gesamtvolumen
von über zwei Milliarden Euro an Krediten ausgereicht hat,
die in fünf „Paketen“ an holländische Zweckgesellschaften verkauft
wurden?
3) Ist es richtig, dass ausschließlich über das Internetportal
Creditweb Darlehensanträge bei der GMAC eingereicht werden
konnten? Wenn nein, welche weiteren Internetportale waren dazu
berechtigt?
4.) Ist es richtig, dass die mit der Creditweb kooperierenden
Vertriebe keine Originalunterlagen der Kreditsuchenden, sondern
lediglich Kopien eingereicht haben? Hat sich die GMAC-RFC Bank
seinerzeit Originale der Lohn- und Gehaltsunterlagen der Kreditnehmer
vorlegen lassen?
5.) Ist es richtig, dass in dem Baufilligenzprogramm es lediglich
auf die finanzielle Situation des Darlehensnehmers ankam und dass
Kredite bis zur Höhe des siebenfachen Jahresnettoeinkommens fi-
nanziert wurden?
6.) Ist es richtig, dass die Gewährung der Kredite auf der Grundlage
des Pfandbriefgesetzes erfolgte?
7.) Wie erfolgt der Nachweis der Aktivlegitimation der GMAC
Servicing GmbH in Fällen, in denen die Vollstreckung bei notleidenden
oder gekündigten Darlehen erforderlich wird?
GoMoPa.net ersuchte die GMAC-RFC Servicing GmbH in Wiesbaden
mehrmals, zu dem Rundbrief an die deutschen Kreditnehmer
Stellung zu beziehen. Die Geschäftsführerin Jennifer Anderson sei
in den USA, eine Telefonnummer sei nicht bekannt. Die Pressesprecherin
Katharina Dahms sei in Urlaub und hätte keine Vertretung.
Und der Prokurist Sven Klärner, der noch Auskunft geben könnte,
rief trotz mehrfacher Bitten von GoMoPa.net nicht zurück – er wird
wissen warum. „
Hintergrund:
Die SJB-GoMoPa-Opfer behaupten: „Der abgetauchte Berliner
Zweig der GoMoPa-Gangster will nun zusammen mit ihrem Hausanwalt
RA Jochen Resch, Berlin, die DKB erpressen – so wie sie dies
vorher mit Immovation versucht haben.
Estavis hat bezahlt, damit ein Grundsatzurteil gegen sie nicht
unter den Käufern ihrer Immobilien verbreitet wird. Dasselbe Spiel
versuchen der Knacki Maurischat und sein Kumpan Resch nun auch
bei der DKB durchzuziehen.
Eigengartig, da schliesst ein Finanzforum aus Deutschland mit
Briefkasten in New York einen Vertrag ab mit einem börsenkotierten
Immobilien-Unternehmen aus Berlin, der Estavis AG. Dieser
Vertrag umfasst Dienstleistungen im Marketingbereich für den Abverkauf
Denkmalgeschützter Eigentumswohnungen. Kontraktwert:
€ 100’000 ! Eine sehr eigenartig Vereinbarung.“
Börse Online: „Der Anlegeranwalt Jochen Resch kommt neuerdings
oft in den Pressemitteilungen vor, die der Finanzdienst Gomopa
ungefragt an Redaktionen verschickt. Als „Deutschlands bekannteste
Anlegerschutzkanzlei“ wird Resch Rechtsanwälte in einem
Bericht über das Ende der Noa Bankvorgestellt. Zu Schrottimmobilien
äußert sich Resch, zu einem Skandal um den Immobilienfondsanbieter
Volkssolidarität. Die Offenheit ist neu. Früher ging
Gomopa Resch hart an und konfrontierte ihn mit Vorwürfen. Doch
einige Formulierungen in einer Teilhaberinformation zur finanziellen
Situation Gomopas vom Juli 2010 legen nahe, dass der Sinneswandel
vielleicht nicht nur Zufall ist.
Gomopa, eigentlich Goldman Morgenstern & Partners Consulting
LLC mit Sitz in New York, ist seit mehr als zehn Jahren aktiv. Auf
der Website ist unter den Fachautoren der bekannte Bestsellerautor
Jürgen Roth aufgelistet. Im Handelsregister der deutschen Zweigniederlassung
ist als Geschäftszweck an erster Stelle „wirtschaftliche
Beratung, insbesondere des Mittelstandes“ aufgelistet. Dazu gehöre
„die Präsentation von Firmen im Internet und anderen Medien“. Die
Verbindung des Dienstes mit einem Nachrichtenportal im Internet
sieht Gomopa-Gründer Mark Vornkahl nicht als Problem: „Ein Interessenkonflikt
zwischen kostenpflichtiger Beratung, Informationsabonnement
und öffentlicher Aufklärung ist uns seit Bestehen nicht
untergekommen.“
Doch die Nutzer des Portals erfuhren bislang nicht, ob mit Personen
oder Organisationen, über die berichtet wurde, vertragliche
Beziehungen bestehen. Reschs Kanzlei war laut Teilhaberinformation
zeitweise eine wichtige Finanzierungsquelle von Gomopa. Darin
berichtet Gomopa-Mitgründer Klaus Maurischat, dass eine Vereinbarung
mit der Kanzlei „momentan 7500,- Euro im Monat einbringt
– rund 25 Prozent unserer monatlichen Kosten!“. Für „individuelle
Mandantenanwerbung“ stehe die Gesellschaft mit mehreren Anwaltskanzleien
in Verhandlungen.
Anwalt Resch stellt zum Inhalt der Vereinbarung klar: „Wir haben
einen einmaligen Rechercheauftrag erteilt, der im üblichen
Rahmen honoriert wird.“ Mit Mandantenbeschaffung habe das nichts
zu tun. Was Gomopa von einer Mandantenanwerbung hätte, ist
auch unklar. Denn Anwälte dürfen dafür nicht bezahlen. Auf unsere
Anfrage zu dieser und weiteren Fragen gab Vornkahl keine inhaltliche
Antwort beziehungsweise verwahrte sich gegen Zitate aus den
entsprechenden Passagen seiner E-Mail, weil er einem Mitbewerber
„keine Auskünfte zur Ausgestaltung unseres Geschäftsbetriebes
gebe.“
Ein Insider: „Was glauben Sie, wer auf die Idee kam, die
ominöse Briefkasten-Firma Goldman, Morgenstern & Partner LLC,
„GoMoPa“, einen angeblichen Zusammenschluss jüdischer Anwälte
in den USA zu gründen und wer die vielen Anwälte wie RA Albrecht
Saß, Hamburg, OLG Richter a.D. Matthias Schillo, Potsdam, und RA
Thomas Schulte, Berlin, zur Reputationsaufbesserung aufbot ?
a) RA Jochen Resch oder b) Ex-Gefängnisinsasse Klaus
Maurischat, der kaum Englisch spricht ? Und: Heinz Gerlach war
dicht dran, diese Zusammenhänge aufzuklären über den „Estavis“-
“Beratungsvertrag“. Seine Tochter, eine Rechtsanwältin in New York,
hatte bereits eine eidesstattliche Versicherung über die Brifekasetn
Firma „Goldman, Morgenstern & Partner LLC“ und deren Briefkastenadresse
in New York abgegeben und er hatte Strafanzeige wegen
der „Estavis“Beratungs-Affäre“ abgegeben. Dann wechselt auf einmal
der von Immovation zur Aufklärung von „GoMoPa“ beauftragte
„Detektiv“ Meinhard Fuchs trotz eines bereits bezahlten Honorares
von über € 60.000,- die Seiten hin zu „GoMoPa“ und Heinz Gerlach
stirbt plötzlich und für alle unerwartet angeblich an Blutvergiftung,
seltsam…“

Handelsblatt über die kriminellen “GoMoPa”-Betrüger der fingierten “Goldman, Morgenstern u. Partner”

http://www.handelsblatt.com/finanzen/boerse-maerkte/boerse-inside/finanzaufsicht-untersucht-kursachterbahn-bei-wirecard/3406252.html

IMMOVATION AG: Frei erfundene Behauptungen von STASI “GoMoPa” – 3.400 Firmen und Personen gestalkt und erpresst

http://www.finanznachrichten.de/nachrichten-2010-08/17777077-immovation-ag-frei-erfundene-behauptungen-des-informationsdienstes-gomopa-im-zusammenhang-mit-angeblichem-sturz-des-frueheren-brandenburgischen-mini-007.htm

IMMOVATION AG: Frei erfundene Behauptungen des “Informationsdienstes” GoMoPa im Zusammenhang mit angeblichem Sturz des früheren brandenburgischen Ministers Prof. Schelter – Einstweilige Verfügung beantragt

Kassel (ots) – Erneut wehrt sich die Kasseler IMMOVATION Immobilien Handels AG, ein seit über zwei Jahrzehnten sehr erfolgreiches, bundesweit tätiges Unternehmen der Immobilienbranche, gegen die unverändert anhaltende Schmutzkampagne des sogenannten “Informationsdienstes” GoMoPa (mit Sitz im Ausland), dessen Gründer und “CEO” Klaus Maurischat ebenso wie Mitgründer Mark Vornkahl bereits wegen Betrugs verurteilt wurden. Der 2006 rechtskräftig verurteilte Maurischat gab sogar gegenüber dem Handelsblatt weitere Verurteilungen zu (Handelsblatt vom 07.04.2010), woraufhin das Handelsblatt wörtlich konkludierte: “Es ist allerdings nicht das erste Mal, dass GoMoPa-Vertreter ins Zwielicht geraten”.GoMoPa suggerierte am 16. August 2010 in einer “Pressemitteilung”, dass IMMOVATION-Vorstandsmitglied Lars Bergmann sogar für den Sturz und das Karriereende des früheren brandenburgischen Ministers Professor Dr. Kurt Schelter durch Immobiliengeschäfte verantwortlich zeichne. In diesem Zusammenhang verweist die IMMOVATION AG auf eine schriftliche Mitteilung von Professor Dr. Kurt Schelter vom 18. August 2010:”Diesen Zusammenhang gibt es nicht. Ich kenne Herrn Bergmann nicht und habe mit ihm persönlich keine Immobiliengeschäfte abgeschlossen. Mir ist auch nicht bekannt, dass Herr Bergmann etwa mit Verkäufern der von mir damals erworbenen Immobilien persönlich oder institutionell in Verbindung stand oder steht. Ich halte dies für ausgeschlossen.”

Minister a.D. Professor Dr. Kurt Schelter

Die IMMOVATION AG hat dieser eindeutigen Mitteilung von Herrn Professor Schelter nichts hinzuzufügen und unterstreicht erneut ihr volles Vertrauen in die Fähigkeit ihrer Klienten, Mitarbeiter und Vertriebspartner, sich selbst ein entsprechendes Bild von dieser Schmutzkampagne machen zu können, in der es dem Autor dieser verleumderischen GoMoPa-“Pressemitteilung” zudem nicht einmal gelang, das Amt des betreffenden Ministers korrekt zu bezeichnen: Im Gegensatz zu seiner Bezeichnung bei GoMoPa war Herr Professor Schelter nicht Finanzminister, sondern Minister der Justiz und für Europaangelegenheiten des Landes Brandenburg.

Die IMMOVATION AG hat im Zusammenhang mit dieser und zahlreichen weiteren unzutreffenden Behauptungen in dieser “Pressemitteilung” heute, 24.08.2010, beim Landgericht Berlin eine einstweilige Verfügung u. a. gegen Goldmann Morgenstern & Partners Consulting LLC (New York) und die GoMoPa GmbH (Berlin) beantragt. Mit der Verfügung soll den Antragsgegnern untersagt werden, die grob diffamierende Pressemitteilung zu verbreiten oder verbreiten zu lassen.

Ausschüttung der Genussrechte

Zum sechsten Mal in Folge schüttete die Kasseler IMMOVATION AG die Rendite aus den Genussrechten an ihre rund 1.500 Anleger in Deutschland und Österreich aus. Über 1,91 Mio. Euro wurden für das Jahr 2009 an die Anleger pünktlich per 31.07.2010 ausbezahlt. Informationen zu weiteren aktuellen Themen finden Sie auf der Homepage der IMMOVATION AG: http://www.immovation-ag.de

DIE “GoMoPa”-Opferliste 2010 – getarnt als “Warnliste” von den fingierten “Goldman, Morgenstern u. Partnern” erstellt

Folgende Firmen und Personen wurden u.a. von Peter Ehlers (wenn er denn so heisst) und “GoMoPa”, dem STASI-”NACHICHTENDIENST” seit Jahresanfang 2010– ohne jeden Beweis – verunglimpft und verleumdet u.a mit fingierten Presseberichten, fingierten Anzeigen und insbesondere im fingierten “OMoPa”-Berufsverbrecherportal verleumdet, um daraus Profit für Ihren postkommunistischen Saftladen zu schlagen:

GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
2
 Anton
 Abdul Sheikh
 Abraham
 Akcay
 Aksoy
 Aktürk
 Alexandre
 Alsguth
 Arnold
 Arnol Arslan
 Artschwager
 A & G Insurance Corporation
A & O Finanz- und Immobilenvertriebsservice GmbH
A+B Finanz
A+K Fina
 AA Capital
 ABAG BETEI
 Abbey House Acquisitions
 ABC Finanzdienst
 Accent-Finanz GmbH
 ACCENTA IMMOBILIEN MANAGEMENT AG
 ACI Alternative Capital Invest GmbH
 Acoreus Collection Service
 Acorn Consulting
 Activ 3000 GmbH
 Activa GmbH
 Activa Wirtschaftsberatung GmbH
 Actiwa Vermittlung von Finanz- und Vorsorgekonzepten e.K.
 Adeshieman Company
 Aditus Fonds GbR
 Admus AG
 Adolph & Komorsky International GmbH
 Advance Invest AG
 ADVANCE INVEST AG S.A.
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
3
 Advanced Group Kuwait
 Advanced Program Trading AG
 Advin Consult Finanzierungsvermittlungs GmbH
 Advisa Consulting GmbH
 Aeternus Energy Corp
 AFG AMERICAN FINANCIAL GROUP INC.
 Agentur Herold
 Agentur Leif Schurig
 AGR Allgemeine Gewerbedatei e.K.
 Ahorn Trust AG
 AIF Bank & Trust Company
 AJPA Broker SA
 Akeman Capital
 AKJ Allgemeine Leasing AG
 AKJ Privatfinanz AG
 AKJ-Firmengruppe
 AKK Dienstleistungs GmbH
 Aktienpower AG
 AktienPowerMarketing GmbH
 Akzenta AG
 Albion Investment Management
 Alexander Freiherr von Pillnitz & Berenberg Treuhandgesellschaft 1908 Limited
 Allgemeine Giro 24 GmbH
 ALLGEMEINE IMMOBILIEN-BÖRSE GmbH
 ALMO Hausbau GmbH
 Alpha Finanzsanierungs GmbH
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
4
 Alpha Oil Inc.
 Alphapool AG
 Alpina Finanz GmbH
 Alternative Capital Invest
 ALV Auto-Leasing und Vermietungs GmbH
 Alvino Group
 AMBROS/VBS
 American Investment & Finance Corporation
 AMK Akustikbau GmbH
 AMK Immobilienbetreuung GmbH
 Anderson & Goldberg S. L.
 Anderson McCormack Group S.L
 Anderton Stoner&Partner
 Anglo African Minerals plc
 Ango-Käufer-Service GmbH & Co. KG
 Antassia GmbH
 Anthony & Carter
 Apex Investments Corporation
 Apex Trading Group
 Applied Cash International
 APT Advanced Program Trading AG
 Aquaorbis AG
 ARCADIA Finanz- & Wirtschaftsberatung
 Arena GmbH
 Argos Finanz GmbH
 Ario AG
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
5
 Armaco
 Art Bauträger u. Immobilienhandelsgesellschaft mbH
 Artemis Financial
 AS Bau Berlin
 ASC AG für Satellitenkommunikation
 ASCANIA Vermögensverwaltung
 Ascor Media Ltd.
 ASG GmbH
 Assecura-Assecuranz Vermittlungs GmbH
 Associated Management Group
 Associated Management Group (AMG Zurich)
 Aston Rowe Consulting Advisory
 Atlantis Exploration AG
 Atlantis-Genossenschaft
 Au Vi Product GmbH
 Aufina Holding
 Aurora Gold Corp.
 Australian Lottery
 Autosafe Parkhaus AG
 Autotester 24
 AVAG Allgemeine Vermögensverwaltung AG
 AVAG-Funds
 AVD AG
 AVM AG
 AvW Invest AG
 AXXIOM AG
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
6
 Azalenia Basel AG
 Amaxopoulus
 Arntzen
 Aniol
 Altmann, Dr.
 Assenmacher
 Appel
 Aulenbach
 Aengenheister
 Amonath
 Asmus
 Almer
 Anlauf
 Aniol
 Blon von
 Barney
 Bajcar
 Bronischewski
 Butler
 Becker
 Berger
 Burat
 Buettner
 Behring
 Baumert
 Becker
 Bünning
 Bok
 Bahcecioglu
 Bahceli
 Balicioglu
 Balogh
 Barteczko
 Becker
 Bergenthal
 Bindokat
 Böhrer
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
7
 Born
 Bortstein
 Busch
 Böhm
 Braun
 Blum
 B u. S Technologie GmbH
 Bachmann Roth Advisory
 Badenia Bausparkasse
 Bagleys Investment Company
 Baltica Savings & Investment Cop.
 Bank Leumi AG
 Bankgesellschaft Berlin
 Banque Bruxelles Lambert (BBL)
 Barlow & Ramsey
 Barringer and Co.
 Basel Institutional
 Basic Trading Solution Ltd.
 Bau- und Grund Immobilien GmbH
 Bauconsult Gesell. für Haus- u. Grundbesitz
 Baucontrol GmbH
 Baufinanzierungszentrum Berlin – Karlshorst
 BAV-Konzept Versicherungsmakler GmbH
 Bavaria Invest Finanzmanagement
 Bavaria Trading Company
 Baye Invest
 BÖRSENPOWER Coaching und Verwaltungsges.m.b.H.
 BBAP Assekuranzmakler & Finanzdienstleistungs GmbH
 BeFa Invest GbmH & Co KG
 BelSwissBank
 BEMA Investitions- und Beteiligungsgesellschaft GmbH
 Benedict Lifeline GmbH
 BENEDICT Star GmbH
 Benitex AG
 Benson & Raymond Acquisition
 Berger Daniel
 Bergues Invest SA
 Bestgambling.Com
 BESTLIFESELECT AG
 BF Bayerische Baufinanz GmbH
 BFS Neckarsulm
 BFTS AG Schweiz
 BHG Baugenossenschaft Hockenheim e.G
 BIK Bauträger
 Biotech Development
 Bishop & Parkes Advisory
 Blanc & Baumar
 Blinder International
 BLISTER YACHTING GMBH
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
8
 Bloomfield Consulting AG
 Bond and Future Group Ltd.
 Bonetti & Wilmers
 Bonus Bauträgergesellschaft mbH
 Borsa Financial Inc.
 BR Consultance Alfaz S.L.
 Branchenklick
 Branko Financial Service
 BRAZIL-INVEST-VC LTDA
 RDS-Dienstleistungen
 Breadley Steigenberger & Partner (BSP)
 BREBA Invest S.L.
 Brentana Wohnbau GmbH
 Brett Commodities GmbH
 Bright Capital Banker Ltd
 Britannia Swiss Equities – BSE AG
 Brodowski Dach- und Fassadenbau GmbH
 Brodowski und Deyna Immobilien GmbH
 Brokers Society Sociedad de Gesti? Tramitaci Financier
 Brown & Lampe U.S. Portfolio Management Ltd.
 BSD GmbH
 Bullion Trading Group
 Bund der Verbraucher (BDV)
 Burbach Consulting GmbH
 Business Partner Credit GmbH
 Brauer
 Bogatz
 Birner
 Bastert
 Baeuerle
 Bertges
 Barteczko
 Bertges
 Beyer
 Bogatz
 Bender
 Bens
 Bösebeck
 Bouderi
 Baan
 Bender
 Birkins
 BECK
 Barthel
 Beyreuther
 Banghard
 Bohrmann
 Bauer
 Bludau
 Bajcar
 Bernhart
 Belkenheid
 Barthel
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
9
 Baumbach
 Barde
 Casula
 Carsten
 Celik
 Cengiz
 Clemann
 Cura
 Cuti
 Cuti
 Campa
 C & P Mutual
 C. Gewerbeimmobilien
 Callux Forderungsmanagement
 Calvin & Sanderson Associates
 Cambridge Asset Management AG
 Cameron Poe & Associates Inc.
 CAP-NETWORK AG
 Capital Securities International
 Capitalinform Limited SA
 Capitalinform Limited SA
 Car Leasing Agency Ltd.
 Carsten Haus GmbH
 Carver Brooks & Associates Ltd.
 Cash Group AG
 Cash-Immobilien GmbH
 Cashselect
 CasMaker Ltd.
 Castor Capital
 Cater & Sattler OHG
 Caviar Creator Inc
 CB Freie Versicherungsmakler GmbH
 CBC
 CDH AG
 Census Grund GmbH & Co KG
 Centracon
 Centracon Investment AG
 Centro Euro Service AG
 Centro Euro Service AG
 Centro-Service GmbH
 Ceptum AG
 Ceres Warenhandels- und Beratungsgesellschaft mbH
 Certus Consulting
 CH Devisen Macht SA
 CHEAPLY SMOKING CLUB
 Chiemgauer Vermögensverwaltung
 Chips Virtual Casino
 CIC Insurance Company SA
 Cinerenta Gesellschaft für Internationale Filmproduktion mbH
 Cis Deutschland AG
 City Hyp Finanzierungsvermittlung
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
10
 City Zins Finanzierungsvermittlungs AG
 CL Inkasso AG
 CL Inkasso AG
 Clean Lease GmbH
 CLEAN PATENT GMBH
 Club Alanzo VIP Cruises
 CMP Global Consulting Ltd
 CMX Capital Markets Exchange AG
 CNP Casino
 Colebrooke Management Holdings
 Color für Kinder e.V.
 Comitas Agentur VSV
 Commercial Development Bank
 Commercial First Trading Corporation
 Complete Commodity Trading
 Comroad AG
 ComTex Vermögens- und Verwaltungs GmbH
 OMVAL Capital AG
 Concorde International – Business Consultants
 Condor Gold and Minerals Inc.
 Conductis GmbH
 Conik Invest
 Coninvest Finanz AG
 Conradi & Hilger Gbr mbH
 Consens Gesellschaft für Projektentwicklung u. Vermittlung von Immobilien
 Consolidated Capital Management Limited (CCML)
 Content Services Ltd.
 Contracta Grundstücksmanagement GmbH
 Convent Consulting GmbH
 CONVERGEX CARIBBEAN, LTD.
 Conzeptfinance Ltd.
 Cooperativa Extranjero de Credito y Investiamento SA
 Cornhill Management S.L.
 Cosena Management S.L.
 CP Medien AG
 CPTD – Central Patent & Trademark Database
 CR Consulting GmbH
 Credit for you Limited
 Credit Mirabaud
 Creditnet Bank Internationale
 CS Capital Service GmbH
 CST Umwelttechnik und Innovation e.G.
 Cumulus Gesellschaft für Immobilien- Investitionen mbH
 Cura Investitions- und Beteiligungsgesellschaft
 Cmok
 Cordes
 Chuen
 Drabnitzke
Dana
Dogs
Doll
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
11
Doujak
Dziuba
Dorsch
Becker
DAK Finanz
Danaro Invest
Asset Management
DAT Finance AG
DBVI AG
De Lotto Switzerland
Delmont Wealth Management
Deltoton AG
DEM Marketing
Demirok GmbH Bauunternehmen
Densch & Schmidt GmbH
Der Informant GmbH
Deutsche Contracting GmbH
Deutsche Immobilien Grundvermögen Holding AG
Deutsche Mentor für Finanzen (DMFF) e.K.
Deutsche Mentor für Finanzen AG
Deutschen Anlage- und Beteiligungs Aktiengesellschaft (Dabag)
Develop Management GmbH
Deyna Immobilien GmbH
DHB-Dreiländer-Handels und Beteiligungsgesellschaft Walter Fink KG
Die Agentur
Die Tradergemeinschaft – Best of Marketing SARL
Dierig Unternehmensberatung
DIHA Dienstleistungs – und Handel GmbH
DIP AG
DIREKTE VERMÖGENSBERATUNGSGESELLSCHAFT MBH
Direkter Anlegerschutz e.K.
Distefora Holding AG
Dividium Capital Ltd
DLF-Immobilienportfolio-Walter-Fink KG
DM Beteiligungen AG
DMI Derivatives Management Inc.
DMP-Gruppe
DMV – Deutsche Markenverlängerungs GmbH
Dohmen-Invest
Domizil Immobilien Leasing GmbH
Domusfinanz
Dow Win Financial Group Corporation
DPMV-Deutsche Patent- und Markenverlängerung GmbH
Dr. Antonio GAMPA
Dr. Bassam Bouderi
Dr. Cornelius Gregorius Consulting Inc
Dr. Gerbig Treuhand GmbH
Dr. Görlich Grundbesitzbeteiligungs GmbH
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
12
Dr. Hanne Grundstücks GmbH
Dr. Hartmannsdorf Immobilien GmbH
Dr. Mayer & Cie. GmbH
Dr. Peters
Dr. Schmitt Inc.
Dr. Werner Financial Service AG
Dragon Partners Inc.
Dreiländerfonds DLF
Dreiländerfonds DLF-94/17
Drexel Management GmbH
Dubai International Investment & Trading
Dubai-1000-Hotel-Fonds
Duesenberg Financial Group Inc.
Dunas de Corralejo S.L.
Dupont Conseille AG
Dux Partners AG
Dörflinger
Dallüge
Deutsch
Dittel
Dierkes
Deubelbeiss
Dallinger
Drewitz
Eichhorn
Erber
Elbert
Ebner
Eroglu
Eschinger
Ettelt
Evcil
E-Money Power (EMPFX)
E.U.R.O.- Unternehmens- & Wirtschaftsberatungs- Ltd.
EAG AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT für WIRTSCHAFT
Earnshaw Advisory Services
Earthsearch Communications Inc.
Easy Concept Hamburg KG ( E@sy )
EBC AG
EBCON – Europäische Verbraucherberatung
Ebcon Europäische Verbraucherberatung AG
Ecco
Economy Capital Corporation
Ecotrend Holding AG
ECP Euro Caribbean Properties Ltd.
ECTO GmbH
Ecumoney Limited
Edgar Heumann GmbH
EECH AG
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
13
EEIG – Europäische Wirtschaftskammer
Effekten- und Edelmetallberatungs GmbH
Effinance Private Equity AG
EKC
Elbe Emissionshaus
Elefant Immobilien GmbH
EM.TV AG
EMA Event Management Agentur GmbH
Embdena
Emmerson Bennett
Empresa Minera (Bergbau) AG
Enexoma AG
Equinox Private Consultants Ltd.
ERGO-Plan
Erich Holderer Finanzdiestleistungen
ESKATA Finanz- Immobilien- Handels GmbH
ESTEKAR LIMITED
Estreel GmbH & Co.KG
EuMedien
Eurefi Eurefi Holding AG
Euregio Immobilien L&F B.V.
EURENTA Gesellschaft für Anlagen-, Renten- und Sparkonzeptionen GmbH
EURENTA Gesellschaft für Marketing- und Promotion GmbH
Euring GmbH
EURO CREDIT UNION
EURO Finanz Consult AG
Euro Finanz Management
Euro Kapital AG
Euro Real Investment Company
Euro Trading GmbH
Euro-American Beteiligungsvermittlungsg. MbH
EURO-CONSULT e.K.
Euro-Pool AG
EUROCAPITAL BANK INC.
Eurocapital Investment Corporation
EURODOM Berlin GmbH
Eurogoldtrader
Eurokapital AG
Eurolink Consult GmbH
European Estates&Investment AG
European Kings Club
European Trade marks and Designs
European Trademark Organisation S.A.
Europäische Schuldenregulierungs- und Ausgleichsanstalt
Europäische Wirtschaftskammer für Handel, Gewerbe und Industrie
EUROTRADE & CONSULTING AG
Eurotrust Capital Management
EV&K
Evantus Invest
EVD Direktverkaufs AG
EWR Wirtschaftsdatenregister
Exakt Martkanalysen Research GmbH
Exeltrade
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
14
Engels
Eder
Esser
Elas
Ehrenberg
Eilts
Eich
Eich
Eder
Engler
EISENBERG
 Felgner
Flug
Feyh
Freke
Florian
Fasan
Fritsch
Freiherr von Fink
Fink
Ferrera Dr. F & P Aktiengesellschaft & Co. KG
F.I.P. GmbH
F.V.F
FA. Haustein Finanzvermittlung
Fafa Capital
Faktor 1 GmbH
Falcon Euro Trading Limited
Falcon Oil Group
Falk Capital AG
Falk-Gruppe
Falken Depot Management GmbH
Falken GmbH
Falken Vermögensverwaltung GmbH
FALLON BANCROFT HOLDING
Fashionact Industries Inc.
Noske
FB Bauträger GmbH
FDMV FINANZDIENSTLEISTUNGEN
FFB Dörflinger GmbH
FFCC Verwaltungs GmbH & Co. Finanzdienstleistungs KG
FG Finanz-Service AG
FGP & Cie
Fibeg Finanzberatung- und Vermögensverwaltungs GmbH
Fibu AG
Fideles & Associates AG
Fidelity International
FIDU payment services S.A.
Finama Vermögensverwaltungs KG
Finance Concept GmbH
Finance Service International
Financial Consulting
Financial Consulting UK Limited
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
15
Financial Planning Systems Ltd.
Financieros Panama – Societaet Rodriguez Batista Diaz
Finanz Score GbR
Finanz Service Hennig
Finanzprogramme Bentley & Partner
FINANZtest Center
Finanzvermittlung Fritz Guth
Finanzvermittlung und Wirtschaftsdienst Ott GmbH
Finbrands Global Limited
Fine Trading Group Finvest Asset Management
FIPTR Federated Institute for Patent- &
Trademark Registry First Canadian Joint Venture
& Consulting Inc. First Canadian Joint Venture
& Consulting Inc. (Canada)
First China Corporate Management Group
First Garant Fund AG First Intercontinental
Bancorp. Ltd. First Invest Grundbesitz
GmbH First Invest Swiss Trade
First Real Estate Grundbesitz GmbH
First Saxonia Trading Ltd
Flash Finance Floris Bank
FOCUS Immobilien und Projektbau GmbH
FOKUS INVEST AG Foma Internationale
Inkassogesellschaft mbH
Fondax Capital Trust GmbH & Co. KG
Fondshaus Hamburg FORBIS Corporation
Force Worldwide Investments Corp
Foreign Exchange Clearing House Ltd.
Forest Finance Service GmbH
Forex4free Forexone-Broker
Forst Finance AG Four Stars AG
Frankonia Sachwert AG FRD International
Free Finance -Service Futura Finanz AG
Futura-Concept GmbH FXTSwiss
Fridez Fridez
Frau Floßbach
Fritz Franko
Frerichs Fink
Fridez Fasan
Filsinger
Freiherr von Lepel
Frydenlund Foetzsch
Fridez Fridez
Fitz
Grüters
Geyer
Gonnes
Grüner
Gerlach
Gast
Gräbedünkel
Gustav

GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
16
Güttig
Gläßer
Gehle
Gerome
GOLDEN-BALLARIN
Golsch
Gronemeyer
Görlich
Götzl
Gaber
Graupner
Guth
G+M Baubetreuung GmbH
G.V.V. bR.
G.W.F. Grundwert-Bauträger G.M.B.H
Gaiacor International PLC
Galant Immobilien GmbH
Garant Kreditvermittlung
Garant-Hundsdorff-Istanbul
GEBAB
Gebrüder Schmidtlein GbR
GEcoS Holding AG
Geldfinder GmbH
Gemas GmbH
Genius Insurance Service GmbH
Genius Investments – Genius Funds
Geoteck Inc.
Gerd Esser Grundbesitz GmbH
GerGermania Grundbesitz AG
Germania Venture Capital AG
Gesellschaft für Erbenermittlung
Gesellschaft für Exklusive Veranstaltungen Dortmund mbH
Gesellschaft für Finanz- u. Wirtschaftsdienstleistungen (FiWi)
Gesellschaft zur Datensicherung im Internet (GSDI)
Gesellschaft zur Vermittlung kapitalorientierter Finanzanlagen GmbH (GVFK)
GetAssisted Group
GfS Invest GmbH
GGHF Windpark Sitten GmbH & Co. KG
GHS Unternehmensgruppe
GIP Grundstücks-Immobilien & Projektmanagement GmbH
GIV Gesellschaft für Immobilien und Vermögensverwaltung mbH
Glatt & Partner GmbH
GLOBAL – BAU Immobilien GmbH
Global AWS AG
Global Capital Group
Global Cogenix Industrial Corp.
Global Financial Invest AG
Global Foreign Exchange (Switzerland) AG
GLOBAL LIFESTYLE GROUP S.A.
Global Mineral Resources Corp.
Global Pension Plan
Globaltraiding.com Kapitalmanagement
Globalus (Immobilien) Gmbh & Co. KG
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
17
GM Capital Partners
GMF Finanz AG
GMF Treuhandgesellschaft mbH
GO AHEAD SERVICE LTD
GOJ AG
Gold-Barren-Silber.com
Gold-Versandhandel
Goldstein & Partner Inc.
GOT Thimm GmbH
GPS GmGrand Capital Ltd
Great Berlin Wheel GmbH & Co. KG
Grevenreuth AG
Grund und Boden Beteiligungs AG
Grundstücksgemeinschaft Arslan
Grupo Esdinero
Grünewälder GmbH
GSM Gesellschaft für Professionelles Sachwert Management AG
GSM Gesellsc
GTO Gap Trading Online
Gulf Oil Exploration Inc.
GVW – Wirtschaftsclub
GWG Gesellschaft für Wirtschaftsplanung mbH
Göttinger Gruppe
Göttler Finanz AG
Graf
Guillaume
Gropper
Göker
Grotelaers
Günzel
Gelbke
Haugg
Halbey
Händel
Hansen
Heise
Hensel
Hipp
Hirner
Hirth
Heider
Hickl
Hansel
Hauser
Härtel
Heckler
Hambusch Prof.
Herold
Hering Dr.
Herr Budzinski
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
18
Heyer
Hering Dr.
Hartung
Hesselmann
Hettrich
Heiner
Händel
Heinrich
Hartl
Hansch
Hartung
Hepp
Heinekken van
Hanne
Heiliger
Heumann
Hensley-Piroth
Haffa
Holderer
Helfer
Heckmann
Hormann
Hennig
Hermsmeier
Hornberger
Halabi
Herr Gieselmann
Hundsdorff
Hanisch
Hornig
Hambusch Prof.
H.R.L. International
H2O Swiss AG
Hafenstein Marketing GmbH
Hamburg Connection
Hamilton Associates A.G.
Handelshaus Schaar
Handelskontor Fischer
Hansa Treuhand
Hanse Capital
Hanse Club
Hanseatische AG
Hanseatische Senatorenkanzlei
Hansefina GmbH
Hartl Immobilien
Hartl Immobilienmanagement GmbH
Harz Börde Finanz
Haus- und Vermögensverwaltung GmbH (HaVeWa)
Hauser Treuhand Rorschach HTR
Haushaltsfuchs
HB Capital Partners
HBW-Finanz AG
HCI Capital
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
19
HDL Hausdienstleistungsgesellschaft mbH
Helvag AG
Helvetia Treuhand GmbH
Helvetia Treuhand-Union GmbH
Hentsch & Müller S.A.
Hermes Beteiligungs AG
Hermes Portfolio Management GmbH
Bens
HKA-Bank 1954 Ltd.
HNH Finanzberatung-Treuhand GmbH
Horn Wolfgang Dr.
HouseFX AG
HTB Holding
HuHWH International AG
Hypo – Leasing B.V.
Heinen
Hagen
Hoff
Hensel
Hampe
Hauser Metzler
Harksen
Huber
Hartung
Hübner
Hönnscheidt
Hettrich
Hering Dr.
Hettrich
Hübner
Ihl
Izmirlioglu
Izmirlioglu
Immega
I-investorclub Ltd.
I.B.F.T.P.R. International Bureau for Federated Trademark Patent Register
I.B.I.P. International Bureau for Intellectual Property
I.F.I. Ltd. Milincic
IAZ & Partners
IBB GmbH
IBB INTERNATIONAL
IBEKA Immobilienbeteiligung AG
IBH Limited
ICB – Intercontinental Brokerage Corporation
ICM Basel
IContent GmbH
Idee Immo Concept GmbH
Idilei-Treuinvest
IFF AG Zukunftsunternehmen für Investment, Fonds, Finanzen
IFIC Integra Financial Consulting GmbH
IFS International Financial Services Inc.
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
20
IHB Immobilien Heinen & Biege GmbH
IKF
Immorenta Immobilienbeteiligungsgesellschaft mbH
Imperia Invest IBC
Indara Projekt AG
Indices International Group IIG
Info-ZentralInformations-Service-Center (ISC)
Inkasso Team Moskau / TMA GmbH
Innoflex
Innovatio Allfinanz & Franchise System AG
INT Elektrizitätswerk Beteiligungs KG
Integral Finanz AG
Integral Treuhand Vermögensverwaltung GmbH
Integro Capital Partners
Intellectual Property Agency Ltd.
Inter Alpen AG
Inter Capital Bank
Inter Capital Bank Ltd.
Inter Credit Group
Interbank Asset Management Group AG / InterBank AG
Intercontinental Financial Developments Plc.
Interessensgemeinschaft Barbara Merkens
Interfinance Investment & Credits
Interglob AG
INTERMEX International Ltd.
International Bioremediation Services Inc.
International Insurance Holding Inc.
International Invest Ltd
International Travel Services Ltd.
Internet Media AG
Internetwebshop
Inventaire Pro
Inveractivos
InvestInvestor Relations Corp.
Inveteratus Asset Management
IOPTS International Organization for Patent & Trademark Service Corporation
IPS AG – Internationale Produktvermarktungs Systeme
ISR Management & Consulting Ltd
ISS Immobilien Schutz und Service AG (ISS AG)
ISS Immobilienschutz und Service AG
ITL-Enterprises Inc.
Immega
Ibekwe
Just
Jochum
Jester
Junges
Jaeger Research GmbH
Jefferies Associates Group
Jejkal AG Strategische Investments
Johnsons Banking Group
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
21
Johnsons Banking Group
Joseph Cooke Ltd.
Julius Brown AG
Jump
Jachnicki
Jaufmann
Jansson
Jonas
Jedlitschka
Junghänel
Junghänel
Junghänel
Juratsch
Jentzer
Jilg
Jung
Karabunar
Kriewald
Knobloch
Kinner
Käner
Kontze
Kratz
Kostas
Körner
Keffel – Fallahi
Kaiser
Klein
Klaas
Krenzer
Kletsch
Kappes
Kloiber
Kiehl
Kappes
KlaffenböcKraushaar
Kleefisch
Krefft
Klaffenböck
Kaltofen
Kühnen
K & S -Frisia
K&K. B. P. Vermögensverwaltung
K1 Group
K1-Group
Kaikatsu Group
Kanzlei Knil
Kanzlei Range & Partner
Kapital-Consult GmbH
Karriere AG
Köllner-Unternehmensgruppe
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
22
König & Cie
KCP Bank
Kingside Establishment
Kirkland Lee
KK ImmobilienFonds I AG & Co. KG a.A.
Kleeblatt4U
Koch & Eilts GmbH & Co. KG
Koh-I-Noor
Konnex ImmoInvest GmbH
Konsumgüter Direktvertrieb e.V
Kredit einfach Vermittlungs GmbH
Krug Immobilien GmbH
KSF Korrespondenz-Service für Finanzsysteme
KSK International Ltd.
KubKusch und Partner GmbH
Kutag Capital Partners AG
Kutag Group
Kuwait Finance & Investment Company
KVG Internationale Kapitalvermittlung
KVV-Profi Management- und Beteiligung AG
KWD-Marketing
Kühne Bauspar- und Finanzierungsfachbüro
Küng & Partner Vermögensverwaltung AG
Klaffenböck
Klostermann
Keiner
Klappenbach
Klappenbach
Kastler
Kuzmanovic
Kraus
Keil
Kulecki
Kahnhäuser
Klein
Kuhlee
Karabunar
K.
Knobloch
Kiok
Klinge
Koehn
Kuhlen
Lebinger
Lorenz
Luft
Lampe
Leonhard
LehnoLohmann
Lohmann
Lee
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
23
Leindecker
Lökkevik
Lucky Prices S.L.
Lepel Freiherr von
Lemke
Linder
Littig
Langanke
Limburg
Laubach
Lins
Lüthi
LAM Immobilien- und Beteiligungs AG
Landesbank Berlin – LBB/IBV Fonds
Landmark Invest Ltd.
Lange Vermögensberatung GmbH
Lange Vermögensberatung GmbH
Langenbahn AG
LBB-Fonds
LDG Capital Markets Company Limited
Lenz Immobilienhandel AG
Life
Lifetime Products Inc.
Liquid Asset Management Inc.
Lisser Consulting
Litz United GmbH & Co. KG
Locat – Projektsteuerung GmbH
Locstein Asset Management AG
Logotype Klostermann, Lässig
London Hong Kong Exchange plc
LPA Financial Services
LSC. Ltd.
Ltd. Ifi
LVA Garant Fund Inc.
Lichtenfels
Lenz
Leuze
Lengdorfer
Lutz
Marien
Möbius
Müller
Müller
Mohm
Morgenstern
Markof
Müller Dr.
Mathy
Müller
Miersch
Matten
24
Moulatsiotis
MichalMatthiesen
Milincic
Matthies
Merkens
Marx
Meyer
Madden Group Inc.
Magnus GmbH&CO KG
MALAYSIA Credit
Malaysiacredit Van Bergen Corp.
Mallorca Trading
Malmsbury, Harrington and Seaford
Maonara AG
Marine Shuttle AS
Marine Shuttle Operations Inc.
Mark Marketing S.R.O.
Matic-Verlagsgesellschaft mbH
Matterhorn International
Mayer und Cie GmbH
MC Management Consulting & Financial Services
MCC Mariaux Chevre & Cie
McKenzie-Boyle Associates
Med-Synergy Mallorca GmbH & Co. KG
Media Concepte
Media Inkassomanagement AG
Media-Com LTD & Co. KG
Medivest
MEG AG
Mercaforex – Silver Holdings International Ltd.
Mercantus AG
Mercury Forex Investments Assets Ltd.
Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd
METROPOL LEASING GMBH
MFIVE Ltd.
MFS 24
MG Beteiligungs AG
MICONA LTD.
MidAtlantic Holdings plc
Minera Real del Barqueno S.A.
Mitschka Alternative Advisory
MJS Developments S.A.
MK Service & Vertrieb
MK- Service & Vertrieb
MMC Medialog Marketing Company
MMCIS Investments
Mobilica.de
MOLY-FLON LIMITED
Money and Capital ASS.
Money Plus Worldwide Financial Limited
MonMach Marine Insurance Company Ltd.
Morgan Franklin Investment Inc.
MPC Capital
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
25
MPC Capital AG
Mueller Capital Management (MCM)
Multi Advisor Fund I GbR
MWB Vermögensverwaltungs AG
Mehler
MÖLLER-BÜCKINS
Montag
Morris
Manns
Meyer
Mundt
MILLS
McGregor
Müller
 Nicolic
Noske
Neumann
Naumann
Nieder
Noske
Nitsche
Natea Financial Transactions Division
Nationales Markenregister AG
Natur- und Erlebniswelt Schmölln GmbH
NEO TECH PUBLISHING COMPANY INC.
Net Mobile AG
Netsolutions FZE
NEUBERT & PARTNER FINANZMANAGEMENT GMBH
Neuburg Financial AG
Neue Medien GmbH
New Century Capital
NEW Naturpark und Erlebniswelt Schmölln
New World Financial
Newton Forest
Noble Advisory Group
Nodorf und Partner
Non plus ultra Marketing GmbH
Nord Finanz KG
Nord-Analyse/Jürgen Harksen
Nordcapital
Norddeutsche Vermögensverwaltung
North Am GmbH
NOVI BETEILIGUNGS GMBH
NUEVO GMBH
NWK Consulting
NYTS New York Trading Services Ltd.
Nünlist
Noack
 Ohles
Ohlmann
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
26
Obermann
Ohlenschläger
Ottersbach
O Online Casino
OBA OBJEKTPLANUNGS UND BAUGESELLSCHAFT MBH
Obtime GmbH
Ocean s Continental AG
EKOFINANZ PIPER & FISCHER (ÖKOFINANZ)
Offshore Shuttle AS
Olaf Tank – Rechtsanwalt
OLF OBERLAUSITZER FACTORING UND LEASING GMBH
OMNIKRON VERWALTUNGSGESELLSCHAFT MBH
Soldwisch
Optimal-Unternehmensgruppe
Opus one Corporation
Organi Juris GmbH
ORGANIJURIS HOLDING AG
Ost Com Holding AG
Ownership Emissionshaus
Ommer
Oberle
Olek
 Petrenko
Prehn
Piroth
Pelz
Pfeiffer
Piroth
Pirkel
Pirkel
Petsch
Pröckel
Pirkel
Pilling
Pirkel
Paco Integrated Energy Inc.
Pacon Capital S.A.
Pacta Invest GmbH
PACTA-INVEST GmbH
Partner Air Limited
Partner-Computer-Group Ltd.
PayPay Inc.
PayPay S.a.r.l.
PCG
Pentafox Höhn OHG
Pepper United S.R.O.
Perfect4u
Pharma Kontor AG
Phillip Alexander Securities & Futures Ltd.
Phoenix Kapitaldienst GmbH
Phönix Aktiengesellschaft
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
27
Phönix Finanzsanierungs AG
Platinum Group International
Platonja GmbH
Plim Cooperation AG
PLUS CONCEPT GMBH
Plus Finanz Consulting GmbH
Postbank Finanzberatung AG
PPV Produkt-Promotion-Vertrieb
Pradofin
Premium Capital
Premium Firmenservice GmbH
Prime Core AG
Prime Gold Invest AG
Prime Select AG
Primus Consulting Optionshandel GmbH
Prinz zu Hohenlohe Jagstberg & Banghard GmbH
Private Commercial Office (PCO)
Private Equity Capital Group
Private Equity Invest AG
Private Fiduciary Trust GmbH
Private Investment Brokers and Financial Fonds Inc.
PRIZMA F.A. CENTER
Profi Moderne Wohnungsbaugenossenschaft
Profit.sawas.info
Projekta GmbH
Projostar GmbH
Prokon Kapital GmbH
Protectas Vermögensberatung GmbH
Protected International Inc.
PS-Leasing
Piroth
Petry
 Quinz
QES – Die Geldarchitekten
Quantum Asset Management
Quatro Group
QUEEN GMBH
Quinz Jürgen
Quorum AG
 Riesen van
Reegen
Riviera
Rose
Reinke
Ruppert
Rautenberg
Rüdenauer
Rist
Röll
Rohde
Runyeon
Rieß de Sanchez
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
28
Rachensperger
Ramin
Rohde
Range
Reich
Rummelt
Runyeon
Reimers
Rohbeck
R&S GmbH
R.A.P. Vermögensanlagen-Aktiengesellschaft & Co. KG Immobilienverwaltung
Racingkasino.Com
Rainbow Real Estate Ltd.
Ralph Hübner Verlag
Ranston Ltd
Ranston Ltd.
Ravena Finanz Management AG
RDV GmbH
Real Estate AG
Rechtsanwalt Asmus
Register of Commerce – Markenregisterverzeichnis
Renko & Associates
Renta / Löwer
Rentmeister KG
Res Justitia GmbH
Residencia GmbH
Rheinisch Westfälische Grundbesitz AG
Richmond & Palmer Investments Inc
Riverblue GmbH
RK-invest intern. Ltd.
RKI Invest
RKV Finanzservice
Robyns Capital GmbH
Robyns Vermögensverwaltung GmbH
Rodman & Shaw Ltd.
Rontax-Treuhand
Rosiak Dr.
Ruhrstrom GmbH
Ruluso Holding Ltd.
Rushton Limited
Ruspa Capital AG
Ruyan Europe
Richter
Reime
Richtsteig
Rademann
Rippel
 Sälinger
Schwarz
Stefan
Storm
Seuchter
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
29
Seumenicht
Schaefer
Scholl
Siegert
Schuhmann
Scharl
STRÖMBERG
Stanley
Splisteser
Sablowski
Schwarz
Stumpf
Scholz
Steigenberger
Schmidt
Seebacher
Sümper
Steuten
Schwartz
Simon
Schrämli
Spilker
Spanier
Seci
Stolte
Stolte
Schmid
Schmid
Schroeder
Seidel
Schmidtlein
Stangl
Steinbach
Stecker
Szulc
Schäfer
Spilker
Scholl
Stadelmaier
Shadi
Schäfer
Schmidt
Schaul
Sulser -Eggenberger
Schwarz
Sch.
S.
Schroeder Dr.
Schierloh
Sinn
Soldwisch
Smith
Schmidt
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
30
Schrenk
Schieweck
Schmidt
S.
Schmid
S&K Deutsche Sachwert AG
S.B.E. Bank
S.B.E. Financial SA
S.L.I.C.E AG
Sachsen Planke GmbH
Sachsenpark AG
Safe Inrest Quota Obtain Ltd (auch bekannt unter SIQO)
Sagro
Sakura Financial Group
SAM FINANZ AG – Swiss Asset Management
San West Inc.
Sauer & Söhne
Saxonia Sparkasse Inc.
SBAG – Schweizerische Börsenabwicklungsgesellschaft mbH
Schmid Immobilien Ltd.
Schmiedendorf Arzneimittelvertrieb AG
Schuhbecks am Platzl GmbH
Schutzvereinigung der Versicherten, Sparer und Kapitalanleger e. V.
Schwabenland Büro
Schweizer Kapital AG
SCT Bank Ltd.
SD Global Equity AG & Co. KG
Seabed Invest AG
SEB Bank AG
Sebeka GmbH
Secured Communications Limited
Securenta AG
Securities Regulatory and Investment Board (SRIB)
Senior Invest
Servicebüro Natter
SFP Private Banking
SFR AG (Swiss Finance Research AG)
Sherwood Henderson Limited
Shibby & Partners
Sigma Leasing Ltd.
Sigma Trading Limited
Signature Equities Agency GmbH
Signum Edelsteine GmbH
Sisko System Haus AG
Skyline Advisory Group
Solatera Energy AG
Sole Invest GmbH
Solventa Finanzservice GmbH
Sophisticated Investor Inc.
SP Trade Investment Capital Ltd. / SP Trader Fund
Sparkasse Dortmund
Spree Finanz AG
Spree-Capital GmbH
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
31
Star Invest
Stebo GmbH
Steinberg Investment Research AG
Steinberg Investments Ltd.
Stephens Capital Markets Limited
Sterling Asset Management AG
STIFX (stifxonline.com)
Stifxonline.com
Stonehard Consulting d.o.o.
Stratton & Partner
Stratton Wainwright
Suisse Banking
Suisse Life Securities
Sunset Handelsgesellschaft Unternehmergesellschaft
SVK Marketing GmbH
SVM24Direkt
SWAG – Schweizerische Wertpapierabrechnungsgesellschaft AG
SWD Sächsischer Wirtschaftsdienst
Swiss Agricole Asset Management
Swiss Basis GmbH
Swiss Bellair Bank
Swiss Credit Trust AG
SWISS DIVISION
Swiss Finance Conceptions & Marketing AG
SWISS Finance Consult
Swiss Finance Consult AG
Swiss Finance Consult AG
Swiss Finance Research AG
Swiss Key Equity Consult AG
Swiss Lotto – Gesellschaft Schweizer Zahlenlotto
Swiss Lotto Agency
Swiss Lotto Highstakes
Swiss Marketing GmbH
Swiss Siam Investment Club
Swiss Trading
Swiss World Cyber Lottery International – Swiss Lottery
Swiss-American Capital Management Institute,Inc.
SwissAudit Aktiengesellschaft
SwissKap AG
Swisskontor GmbH
Swissridge International Corp.
Switzerland Investment Group
Süddeutsche Stabak AG
Süddeutsche Stabak Aktiengesellschaft AG
Südwestbank AG
System Vorsorge Kapitalvermittlung (SVK)
Schmuck
Simon
Schlag
Sonntag
Schellscheidt
Schildbach
Schmidt
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
32
Surowiec
 Tzolov
Tannenbaum
Thomson
Tucholke
Traxel
Teller
Trisl
TOBER
Tausch
Trice
Thimm
Turgut
Tank
T.K. Immobilien GmbH
Taipan
Talis Enterprise GmbH
Task Force Service GmbH
Taurus GmbH
TBC-Marketing AG
Telba GmbH
Tele Inside s.r.o.
Tellba GMBH
The Crown Group CH
The Vale Group / Vale Group InvestmentsVale Group Asset Management /
Thomas Moore
Titan
Titan Trading Group
TiViBo GmbH
Tortola Capital
Trade Direct GmbH
Transatlantic Business & Management Ltd.
TRC Telemedia e.K.
Treberhilfe Berlin gGmbH
Treff Hotel Beteiligung
Trend Capital AG
Treu-Control Wirtschaftsberatungs- und Treuhandgesellschaft mbH
Treulux AG
Tri-Hub International
Triagon Holding AG
Trias Erste KG
Trias Zweite KG
Trikom Consulting GmbH
Trinity Ventures
TSI Consulting
TSI-Consulting
Turner Mayfield Advisory A.G.
TVI Express
Two For 1 Sportsbook
TXL Business Academy GmbH
TXL Capital Management GmbH
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
33
Tang
Täubert
 Ullmann
Uhlendorff
UBS Deutschland AG
UFB VERMITTLUNGSGESELLSCHAFT MBH
UFP
UGV Inkasso
Ulrich Engler Daytrading
Ulrich Petry
ULRICH VERLAG KG
ULRICH- VERLAG KG
Unabhängige Wirtschaftskanzlei Wolfgang Gelbke
Unia Holding AG
Unia Industrie Holding AG
Unispar Banque PLC
United Invest Management Deutschland Ltd & Co. KG
United Investors
United Markets (Asia) Limited
United Network Industries (Uni AG)
United Re-Insurance Group
United Trust Bank Plc.
United Trust of Switzerland S.A
United Trust of Switzerland S.A.
Unitymedia Hessen GmbH & Co KG
Universal Settlements International (USI) Inc.
Univest Limited
Univesta
Univesta Björk Immobilien und Anlage GmbH & Co.
Unternehmensgruppe Esdinero
UOT Financial Services Limited
US GOLD INTERNATIONAL LTD.
US Securities Agency (USSA)
Usecom Software AG
 Volkmann
Völl
Vitor
Voß
van Dien
van Dyken
Voll
von Eugen
Varin
Varin
Vejpustek
Volk
Vogel
von Krauthahn
V-O-B Handelsgesellschaft mbH
V/F Operation Leasing GmbH
VABA AG
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
34
ValueMaker
VALUTA VERMÖGENSVERWALTUNG GMBH
VanFunds / Vandior Inc.
Vanilla
VCI
Ventana Biotech Inc.
Ventono Capital GmbH
Venture Associates
Verbraucherdienst.e.V
Verimount FZE
Versicherungsdienst
Vertex Commodities
Verum Placement Ltd.
Vierte Juragent GmbH & Co. Prozesskostenfonds KG
VIT EnvironmentSystems AG
Vitascanning AG
Viva Tenerife Services
Volkssolidarität Sozial-Immobilien GmbH
Volkssolidarität Sozialimmobilienfonds GmbH & Co. KG
 Wood
Wächter
Wintzler
Willer
Wiedenbauer
Walkemeyer
Weimer
Walkemeyer
Wolter
Wolter
Wagner
W.
Wagner
Wolfram
Wolfram
Werner Dr.
Wagner
Wulff
Wagner
Weislogel
Walker
Wagner
WABAG – Wirtschaftsanalyse und Beratung AG
Wagner Finanzvermittlung GmbH
Wahl + Partner GmbH
Warrick Management Group Ltd.
Waterman Associates
WBwso Ltd
Wconstrukt
Wealth and Asset Planning
Webtains GmbH
Weizman Associates
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
35
Weizman Associates LLC
Wellshire Securities GmbH
West Atlantic Credit Group
WESTGATE Financial AG
Westminster Financial Management Ltd
Weyhill Establishments
WFB sro
White Birds Germany GmbH
Whitherspoon, Seymour & Robinson Corp.
Who is Who Prominentenenzyklopädie AG
WIBAG Immobilien und Beteiligung Aktiengesellschaft
Wicon Wirtschafts- und Finanzkontor Betz & Kronacher Beteiligungsgesellschaft
WIETEC-Germany
WIG – Wirtschaftszentrale für Industrie und Gewerbe AG
WIHH – Wirtschaftsinstitut für Industrie, Handel, Handwerk AG
WILL GMBH FINANZBERATUNG & VERWALTUNG
William Smith Partners
Wilton Investment Group
WiRe AG
Wirtschafts- und Finanzberatung Lindow-Giebel
Wirtschaftskanzlei Jilg GmbH
Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft Contor GmbH
WNB Finanzanlagen AG
Wohnbaufinanz
Wohnungsbaugesellschaft Leipzig West AG
Wohnungsbaugesellschaft Leipzig-West AG
Wonsei AG
Woodbridge Business Corp.
World Capital Group
World Capital Holding Corporation
WORLD MEDIA FONDS
World Telecom Data
WorldClearing Holding Inc.
Worldexchange
WorldFX-club
WSR – Whitherspoon, Seymour & Robinson Corporation
Würzburger Aktiengesellschaft für Vermögensbeteiligungen und Verwaltung (WAG)
 X Com Ltd.
Ximex Executive Ltd
XYZ NOMINEES LTD
 Y2M Media Limited
YESILADA BANK LTD.
Young Media Spain S.L.
Yuca Park
 Ziedd
Zeitler
Zürbis
Zimmermann
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
Zimmermann
Zürbis
Zietlow
Zürbis
Zollweg
Zürbis
Zensen-Döring
Z.E.N.I.T. AG
ZAK Inkasso
Zapf Creation
ZBI Zentral Boden Immobilien AG
ZDR-Datenregister GmbH
ZeBo GmbH
ZECH & ZECH VERMÖGENSVERWALTUNG GMBH
Zeder Immobilien Treuhand AG
ZEDER INVESTMENT AG
Zenith Commodities Ltd
ZENKER WOHNBAU AG
Zentrum für Wirtschaftspraxis
Zinnwald Financiers
Zucomex The Zurich Commodities Exchange
Zurich Capital Gruppe
Zurich Direct

Opfer in 2011:

– Angela Merkel

– Wolfgang Schäuble

– Accessio AG

– Allianz Global Investors

– Antek International

– Andreas Decker

– Anna Schwertner

– Bank of America

– Barclays

– Bernd Müller

– Bernd Pulch

– Beluga

– Bliznet Group Inc.

– Centrum Immobilien

– Citigroup

– Coldwell Banker

– Commerzbank

– CPA Capital Partners

– Credit Suisse

– CSA

– CWI

– Debiselect

– D.E.U.S.eG – Jürgen Oswald

– Deutsche Bank

– Deutsche Anstalt für Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht

– DKB Bank

– Dr. Paul Jensen

– Ekrem Redzepagic

– Erste Mai GmbH

– Express Kurier Europa

– Financial Services Regulatory Authority of Frankfurt

– FRONTAL 21

– Garbe

– General Global Media

– Genfer Kreditanstalt

– HCI

– HSBC

– HypoLeasing

– Indara

– JPMorgan Chase

– Kreis Sparkasse Tübingen

– Leipziger Bauträger (etliche Firmen, hier subsummiert)

– Lloyds Bank

– Lothar Berresheim

– Martina Oeder

– Martin Sachs

– Meridian Capital

– Money Pay

– Norinchukin Bank

– Oak Tree

– Prime Estate

– Prosperia Mephisto 1 GmbH & Co KG

– Raiffeisen- und Volksbanken

– Rothmann & Cie.

– Stefan Schramm

– Teldafax

– TipTalk.com

– Wirecard

Natürlich alles OHNE IRGENDEINEN BEWEIS VON VORBESTRAFTEN SERIENBETRÜGERN AUF EINER HOMEPAGE MIT KEINER ECHTEN PERSON IM IMPRESSUM STATTDESSEN MIT EINER NEW YORKER BRIEFKASTENADRESSE IM AUFTRAG MUTMASSLICH VON RA JOCHEN RESCH UND RA MANFRED RESCH, PETER EHLERS UND GERD BENNEWIRTZ -UND UNTER MITARBEIT VON GOOGLE, DEUTSCHLAND,

ALS “FRONTMANN” VON “GOMOPA” AGIERT DER DUTZENDWEISE VORBESTRAFTE KLAUS MAURISCHAT UNTER ANDEREM WEGEN BETRUGES AN SEINEM EIGENEN ANLEGER

Das Urteil gegen„GoMoPa“-Maurischat: Betrug am eigenen Anleger wg € 10.000,-

110401 6 Neues Opfer der betrügerischen, fingierten STASI GoMoPa: Andreas Benkenh
Die Verurteilung von Klaus Maurischat und Mark Vornkahl wegen Betruges am eigenen Anleger Klaus Maurischat und Mark Vornkahl, Betreiber vonwww.gomopa.net: Am 24. April 2006 war die Verhandlung am Amtsgericht Krefeld in der Betrugssache: Mark Vornkahl / Klaus Maurischat ./. Dehnfeld. Aktenzeichen: 28 Ls 85/05 Klaus MaurischatLange Straße 3827313 Dörverden.Das in diesem Verfahren ausschließlich diese Betrugsache verhandelt wurde, ist das Urteil gegen Klaus Maurischat recht mäßig ausgefallen.Zusammenfassung der Verhandlung vom 24.04.2006 vor dem Schöffengericht des AG Krefeld in der Sache gegen Klaus Maurischat und Mark Vornkahl.Zur Hauptverhandlung erschienen:Richter Dr. Meister, 2 Schöffen,Staatsanwalt, Angeklagter Klaus Maurischat, vertr. durch RA Meier, Berlin; aus der U-Haft zur Verhandlung überführt.1. Eine Gerichtsvollzieherin stellt unter Ausschuss der Öffentlichkeit eine Urkunde an den Angeklagten Maurischat zu.2. Bei Mark Vornkahl wurde im Gerichtssaal eineTaschenpfändung vorgenommen.Beginn der HauptverhandlungDie Beklagten verzichten auf eine Einlassung zu Beginn.Nach Befragung des Zeugen Denfeld zum Sachverhalt wurde dieVerhandlung auf Wunsch der Staatsanwaltschaft und den Verteidigern unterbrochen.Der Angeklagte Maurischat gab nach Fortsetzung derHauptverhandlung Folgendes zu Protokoll:Er sähe ein, dass das Geld auf das falsche Konto gegangen sei und nicht dem eigentlichen Verwendungszweck zugeführt wurde. Das Geld sei aber zurückgezahlt worden und er distanziere sich ausdrücklich von einem Betrug.Schließung der BeweisaufnahmeDer Staatsanwalt verließt sein PlädoyerEr halte am Vorwurf des Betruges fest. Mit Hinweis auf die einschlägigen Vorstrafen des Angekl. Maurischatund auf laufende Ermittlungsverfahren, beantrage er ein Strafmaß von 1 Jahr und 6 Monaten.Er halte dem Angeklagten zu Gute, dass dieserWiedergutmachung geleistet habe, und dass dieser geständig war. Zudem läge die letzte Verurteilung wegen Betruges 11 Jahre zurück. Auch sei der Geschädigte nicht in existentielle Not geraten, wobei der Staatsanwalt nicht über noch laufende Verfahren hinweg sehen könne. Er läge aber dem Angeklagten Maurischat nahe, keine weiteren Aktivitäten im Bezirk der Staatsanwaltschaft Krefeld auszuüben, insbesondere möchte er, dass keine weiteren Anleger im Bezirk der Staatsanwaltschaft Krefeld durch GoMoPa akquiriert werden.Die Freiheitsstrafe soll zur Bewährung ausgesetzt werden.Plädoyer des Verteidigers des Angekl. Maurischat, Herrn RA MeierEr schließe sich, wie (in der Unterbrechung) vereinbart, dem Staatsanwalt an.Es stimme, dass sein Mandant Fehler in seiner Vergangenheit gemacht habe, und dass er auch diesmal einen Fehler begangen haben könnte, jedoch sei der Hinweis wichtig, dass sein Mandant aus diesen Fehlern gelernt habe.Der Angeklagte haben das letzte Wort.Maurischat sagt, es sei bereits alles gesagt worden.Unterbrechung zu Hauptverhandlung. Der Richter zieht sich mit den Schöffen zur Beratung zurück.Urteilsverkündung:Der Angeklagte wird des gemeinschaftlichen Betrugs für schuldig befunden.Der Angeklagte Klaus Maurischat wird zu einerFreiheitsstrafe von 1 Jahr und 6 Monaten verurteilt. Diese wird zur Bewährung ausgesetzt.Die Bewährungszeit wird auf 3 Jahre festgesetzt.Der Haftbefehl gegen Klaus Maurischat wird aufgehoben.Der Angeklagte trage die Kosten des Verfahrens.UrteilsbegründungDer Richter erklärt, dass eine Täuschung des Geschädigtenvorliegt und somit keine Untreue in Betracht kommen kann.Die Fragen, ob es sich um einen Anlagebetrug handele sei irrelevant. Er hält den Angeklagten die geleistete Wiedergutmachung zu Gute.Ebenso ist das Geständnis für die Angeklagten zu werten. Zudem liegt die letzte Verurteilung des Angeklagten Maurischat 11 Jahre zurück.Die Parteien verzichten auf Rechtsmittel. Das Urteil ist somit rechtskräftig.Mit dem heutigen Urteil endet ein Kapitel in derBetrugssache Goldman Morgenstern & Partners, Klaus Maurischat und Mark Vornkahl.Alle GoMoPa.net Verantwortlichen, Maurischat, Vornkahl und Henneberg sind nun vorbestrafte Abzocker und Betrüger und die Zukunft der Pseudoklitsche GoMoPa.net sieht duster aus.Mir dem Geständnis der beiden ABZOCKER MAURISCHAT UND VORNKAHL vor Gericht bricht ein jahrelangaufrechterhaltenes Lügengeflecht von einigen primitiven Betrügern zusammen. Gewohnheitsverbrecher und Denunzianten,die rechtschaffene Personen und Firmen in ihren Verbrecherforen kriminalisierten.

Gestalkte Immovation und Börse Online über die fingierten “GoMoPa” und deren Verbrechen

http://www.immovation-ag.de/medienpool/meldungen/BoerseOnline_Nr38_16.09.2010_Wo_gehobelt_wird.pdf

Der Beweis: Die kriminelle Karriere der fingierten “GoMoPa” oder “Goldman, Morgenstern u. Partner”

Die Klaus Maurischat

anlage_8_gomopa_abzocker.com_info

anlage_9_gomopa_gesellschaftsmuell.com

anlage_10_juricon_internet_bericht_ber_gomopa

BASTA,- es reicht jetzt!

BoerseOnline_Nr38_16.09.2010_Wo_gehobelt_wird

CSA-Presse-Blog-08-09-GoMoPa-26.02.2010_1

die-fassade-des-gomopa-netzwerks-09.2010

Dokumentation in Sachen GoMoPa-13.03.10

klaus_in_haft

pdf_spionageabwehr

Presseberichterstatung-zu-Maurischat1

resch_gomopa_15072010

RP_Studie_WiKri-Studie_final

Studie_Anlegerschutz

SZ_03.09.2010_Am_virtuellen_Pranger

STATEMENT MAGISTER BERND PULCH u. die STRAFANZEIGEN GEGEN DIE FINGIERTEN “GoMoPa”-BETRÜGER IN DER PRESSE

STATEMENT MAGISTER PULCH 19.4.2011

Fingierte STASI-“GoMoPa”- Grösster Wirtschaftsskandal seit Dr. Jürgen Schneider – 3.400 Firmen u. Personen geschädigt

Liebe Leser,

über 3.400 Menschen und Firmen wurden und werden von STASI-“GoMoPa” gestalkt und erpresst.

Dies hat zu einem – so erste Schätzungen von Schadensexperten – Schaden von über € 1 Milliarde geführt, nimmt man als Berechnungsgrundlage

die im Falle von Meridian Capital geforderte Erpressungssumme.

Der immaterielle Schäden durch zerstörte menschliche Leben und Schicksale, dieser “Dämonen im Internet” (Eigenbezeichnung von Ober-Stalker “Klaus Maurischat”) ist noch viel höher und nur mit dem von der DDR-Gestapo angerichteten Schaden vergleichbar, deren Nachfolgeorganisation die fingierten “Goldman, Morgenstern u. Partner” – “GoMoPa” zweifelsohne sind.

Darunter sind auch etliche Todesfälle und viele Personen und Firmen, die nicht auf der 3.400 Fälle umfassenden “Warnliste”, besser Stalking, Betrugs- und Erpresserliste auftauchen.

Hinzu kommen zahlreiche Fälle von Börsenmanipulation wie im Falle “Wirecard” mit Pennystocks aus der US-Corporation-Schmiede von “GoMoPa”-Partner  “Graf” “Dr.” Stenbock.

Organisierte Kriminalität im ganz grossen Stil.

Wir bleiben am Ball.

Herzlichst Ihr

Magister Pernd Pulch

DIE “GoMoPa”-Opferliste 2010 – getarnt als “Warnliste” von den fingierten “Goldman, Morgenstern u. Partnern” erstellt

Folgende Firmen und Personen wurden u.a. von Peter Ehlers (wenn er denn so heisst) und “GoMoPa”, dem STASI-”NACHICHTENDIENST” seit Jahresanfang 2010– ohne jeden Beweis – verunglimpft und verleumdet u.a mit fingierten Presseberichten, fingierten Anzeigen und insbesondere im fingierten “OMoPa”-Berufsverbrecherportal verleumdet, um daraus Profit für Ihren postkommunistischen Saftladen zu schlagen:

GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
2
 Anton
 Abdul Sheikh
 Abraham
 Akcay
 Aksoy
 Aktürk
 Alexandre
 Alsguth
 Arnold
 Arnol Arslan
 Artschwager
 A & G Insurance Corporation
A & O Finanz- und Immobilenvertriebsservice GmbH
A+B Finanz
A+K Fina
 AA Capital
 ABAG BETEI
 Abbey House Acquisitions
 ABC Finanzdienst
 Accent-Finanz GmbH
 ACCENTA IMMOBILIEN MANAGEMENT AG
 ACI Alternative Capital Invest GmbH
 Acoreus Collection Service
 Acorn Consulting
 Activ 3000 GmbH
 Activa GmbH
 Activa Wirtschaftsberatung GmbH
 Actiwa Vermittlung von Finanz- und Vorsorgekonzepten e.K.
 Adeshieman Company
 Aditus Fonds GbR
 Admus AG
 Adolph & Komorsky International GmbH
 Advance Invest AG
 ADVANCE INVEST AG S.A.
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
3
 Advanced Group Kuwait
 Advanced Program Trading AG
 Advin Consult Finanzierungsvermittlungs GmbH
 Advisa Consulting GmbH
 Aeternus Energy Corp
 AFG AMERICAN FINANCIAL GROUP INC.
 Agentur Herold
 Agentur Leif Schurig
 AGR Allgemeine Gewerbedatei e.K.
 Ahorn Trust AG
 AIF Bank & Trust Company
 AJPA Broker SA
 Akeman Capital
 AKJ Allgemeine Leasing AG
 AKJ Privatfinanz AG
 AKJ-Firmengruppe
 AKK Dienstleistungs GmbH
 Aktienpower AG
 AktienPowerMarketing GmbH
 Akzenta AG
 Albion Investment Management
 Alexander Freiherr von Pillnitz & Berenberg Treuhandgesellschaft 1908 Limited
 Allgemeine Giro 24 GmbH
 ALLGEMEINE IMMOBILIEN-BÖRSE GmbH
 ALMO Hausbau GmbH
 Alpha Finanzsanierungs GmbH
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
4
 Alpha Oil Inc.
 Alphapool AG
 Alpina Finanz GmbH
 Alternative Capital Invest
 ALV Auto-Leasing und Vermietungs GmbH
 Alvino Group
 AMBROS/VBS
 American Investment & Finance Corporation
 AMK Akustikbau GmbH
 AMK Immobilienbetreuung GmbH
 Anderson & Goldberg S. L.
 Anderson McCormack Group S.L
 Anderton Stoner&Partner
 Anglo African Minerals plc
 Ango-Käufer-Service GmbH & Co. KG
 Antassia GmbH
 Anthony & Carter
 Apex Investments Corporation
 Apex Trading Group
 Applied Cash International
 APT Advanced Program Trading AG
 Aquaorbis AG
 ARCADIA Finanz- & Wirtschaftsberatung
 Arena GmbH
 Argos Finanz GmbH
 Ario AG
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
5
 Armaco
 Art Bauträger u. Immobilienhandelsgesellschaft mbH
 Artemis Financial
 AS Bau Berlin
 ASC AG für Satellitenkommunikation
 ASCANIA Vermögensverwaltung
 Ascor Media Ltd.
 ASG GmbH
 Assecura-Assecuranz Vermittlungs GmbH
 Associated Management Group
 Associated Management Group (AMG Zurich)
 Aston Rowe Consulting Advisory
 Atlantis Exploration AG
 Atlantis-Genossenschaft
 Au Vi Product GmbH
 Aufina Holding
 Aurora Gold Corp.
 Australian Lottery
 Autosafe Parkhaus AG
 Autotester 24
 AVAG Allgemeine Vermögensverwaltung AG
 AVAG-Funds
 AVD AG
 AVM AG
 AvW Invest AG
 AXXIOM AG
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
6
 Azalenia Basel AG
 Amaxopoulus
 Arntzen
 Aniol
 Altmann, Dr.
 Assenmacher
 Appel
 Aulenbach
 Aengenheister
 Amonath
 Asmus
 Almer
 Anlauf
 Aniol
 Blon von
 Barney
 Bajcar
 Bronischewski
 Butler
 Becker
 Berger
 Burat
 Buettner
 Behring
 Baumert
 Becker
 Bünning
 Bok
 Bahcecioglu
 Bahceli
 Balicioglu
 Balogh
 Barteczko
 Becker
 Bergenthal
 Bindokat
 Böhrer
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
7
 Born
 Bortstein
 Busch
 Böhm
 Braun
 Blum
 B u. S Technologie GmbH
 Bachmann Roth Advisory
 Badenia Bausparkasse
 Bagleys Investment Company
 Baltica Savings & Investment Cop.
 Bank Leumi AG
 Bankgesellschaft Berlin
 Banque Bruxelles Lambert (BBL)
 Barlow & Ramsey
 Barringer and Co.
 Basel Institutional
 Basic Trading Solution Ltd.
 Bau- und Grund Immobilien GmbH
 Bauconsult Gesell. für Haus- u. Grundbesitz
 Baucontrol GmbH
 Baufinanzierungszentrum Berlin – Karlshorst
 BAV-Konzept Versicherungsmakler GmbH
 Bavaria Invest Finanzmanagement
 Bavaria Trading Company
 Baye Invest
 BÖRSENPOWER Coaching und Verwaltungsges.m.b.H.
 BBAP Assekuranzmakler & Finanzdienstleistungs GmbH
 BeFa Invest GbmH & Co KG
 BelSwissBank
 BEMA Investitions- und Beteiligungsgesellschaft GmbH
 Benedict Lifeline GmbH
 BENEDICT Star GmbH
 Benitex AG
 Benson & Raymond Acquisition
 Berger Daniel
 Bergues Invest SA
 Bestgambling.Com
 BESTLIFESELECT AG
 BF Bayerische Baufinanz GmbH
 BFS Neckarsulm
 BFTS AG Schweiz
 BHG Baugenossenschaft Hockenheim e.G
 BIK Bauträger
 Biotech Development
 Bishop & Parkes Advisory
 Blanc & Baumar
 Blinder International
 BLISTER YACHTING GMBH
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
8
 Bloomfield Consulting AG
 Bond and Future Group Ltd.
 Bonetti & Wilmers
 Bonus Bauträgergesellschaft mbH
 Borsa Financial Inc.
 BR Consultance Alfaz S.L.
 Branchenklick
 Branko Financial Service
 BRAZIL-INVEST-VC LTDA
 RDS-Dienstleistungen
 Breadley Steigenberger & Partner (BSP)
 BREBA Invest S.L.
 Brentana Wohnbau GmbH
 Brett Commodities GmbH
 Bright Capital Banker Ltd
 Britannia Swiss Equities – BSE AG
 Brodowski Dach- und Fassadenbau GmbH
 Brodowski und Deyna Immobilien GmbH
 Brokers Society Sociedad de Gesti? Tramitaci Financier
 Brown & Lampe U.S. Portfolio Management Ltd.
 BSD GmbH
 Bullion Trading Group
 Bund der Verbraucher (BDV)
 Burbach Consulting GmbH
 Business Partner Credit GmbH
 Brauer
 Bogatz
 Birner
 Bastert
 Baeuerle
 Bertges
 Barteczko
 Bertges
 Beyer
 Bogatz
 Bender
 Bens
 Bösebeck
 Bouderi
 Baan
 Bender
 Birkins
 BECK
 Barthel
 Beyreuther
 Banghard
 Bohrmann
 Bauer
 Bludau
 Bajcar
 Bernhart
 Belkenheid
 Barthel
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
9
 Baumbach
 Barde
 Casula
 Carsten
 Celik
 Cengiz
 Clemann
 Cura
 Cuti
 Cuti
 Campa
 C & P Mutual
 C. Gewerbeimmobilien
 Callux Forderungsmanagement
 Calvin & Sanderson Associates
 Cambridge Asset Management AG
 Cameron Poe & Associates Inc.
 CAP-NETWORK AG
 Capital Securities International
 Capitalinform Limited SA
 Capitalinform Limited SA
 Car Leasing Agency Ltd.
 Carsten Haus GmbH
 Carver Brooks & Associates Ltd.
 Cash Group AG
 Cash-Immobilien GmbH
 Cashselect
 CasMaker Ltd.
 Castor Capital
 Cater & Sattler OHG
 Caviar Creator Inc
 CB Freie Versicherungsmakler GmbH
 CBC
 CDH AG
 Census Grund GmbH & Co KG
 Centracon
 Centracon Investment AG
 Centro Euro Service AG
 Centro Euro Service AG
 Centro-Service GmbH
 Ceptum AG
 Ceres Warenhandels- und Beratungsgesellschaft mbH
 Certus Consulting
 CH Devisen Macht SA
 CHEAPLY SMOKING CLUB
 Chiemgauer Vermögensverwaltung
 Chips Virtual Casino
 CIC Insurance Company SA
 Cinerenta Gesellschaft für Internationale Filmproduktion mbH
 Cis Deutschland AG
 City Hyp Finanzierungsvermittlung
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
10
 City Zins Finanzierungsvermittlungs AG
 CL Inkasso AG
 CL Inkasso AG
 Clean Lease GmbH
 CLEAN PATENT GMBH
 Club Alanzo VIP Cruises
 CMP Global Consulting Ltd
 CMX Capital Markets Exchange AG
 CNP Casino
 Colebrooke Management Holdings
 Color für Kinder e.V.
 Comitas Agentur VSV
 Commercial Development Bank
 Commercial First Trading Corporation
 Complete Commodity Trading
 Comroad AG
 ComTex Vermögens- und Verwaltungs GmbH
 OMVAL Capital AG
 Concorde International – Business Consultants
 Condor Gold and Minerals Inc.
 Conductis GmbH
 Conik Invest
 Coninvest Finanz AG
 Conradi & Hilger Gbr mbH
 Consens Gesellschaft für Projektentwicklung u. Vermittlung von Immobilien
 Consolidated Capital Management Limited (CCML)
 Content Services Ltd.
 Contracta Grundstücksmanagement GmbH
 Convent Consulting GmbH
 CONVERGEX CARIBBEAN, LTD.
 Conzeptfinance Ltd.
 Cooperativa Extranjero de Credito y Investiamento SA
 Cornhill Management S.L.
 Cosena Management S.L.
 CP Medien AG
 CPTD – Central Patent & Trademark Database
 CR Consulting GmbH
 Credit for you Limited
 Credit Mirabaud
 Creditnet Bank Internationale
 CS Capital Service GmbH
 CST Umwelttechnik und Innovation e.G.
 Cumulus Gesellschaft für Immobilien- Investitionen mbH
 Cura Investitions- und Beteiligungsgesellschaft
 Cmok
 Cordes
 Chuen
 Drabnitzke
Dana
Dogs
Doll
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
11
Doujak
Dziuba
Dorsch
Becker
DAK Finanz
Danaro Invest
Asset Management
DAT Finance AG
DBVI AG
De Lotto Switzerland
Delmont Wealth Management
Deltoton AG
DEM Marketing
Demirok GmbH Bauunternehmen
Densch & Schmidt GmbH
Der Informant GmbH
Deutsche Contracting GmbH
Deutsche Immobilien Grundvermögen Holding AG
Deutsche Mentor für Finanzen (DMFF) e.K.
Deutsche Mentor für Finanzen AG
Deutschen Anlage- und Beteiligungs Aktiengesellschaft (Dabag)
Develop Management GmbH
Deyna Immobilien GmbH
DHB-Dreiländer-Handels und Beteiligungsgesellschaft Walter Fink KG
Die Agentur
Die Tradergemeinschaft – Best of Marketing SARL
Dierig Unternehmensberatung
DIHA Dienstleistungs – und Handel GmbH
DIP AG
DIREKTE VERMÖGENSBERATUNGSGESELLSCHAFT MBH
Direkter Anlegerschutz e.K.
Distefora Holding AG
Dividium Capital Ltd
DLF-Immobilienportfolio-Walter-Fink KG
DM Beteiligungen AG
DMI Derivatives Management Inc.
DMP-Gruppe
DMV – Deutsche Markenverlängerungs GmbH
Dohmen-Invest
Domizil Immobilien Leasing GmbH
Domusfinanz
Dow Win Financial Group Corporation
DPMV-Deutsche Patent- und Markenverlängerung GmbH
Dr. Antonio GAMPA
Dr. Bassam Bouderi
Dr. Cornelius Gregorius Consulting Inc
Dr. Gerbig Treuhand GmbH
Dr. Görlich Grundbesitzbeteiligungs GmbH
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
12
Dr. Hanne Grundstücks GmbH
Dr. Hartmannsdorf Immobilien GmbH
Dr. Mayer & Cie. GmbH
Dr. Peters
Dr. Schmitt Inc.
Dr. Werner Financial Service AG
Dragon Partners Inc.
Dreiländerfonds DLF
Dreiländerfonds DLF-94/17
Drexel Management GmbH
Dubai International Investment & Trading
Dubai-1000-Hotel-Fonds
Duesenberg Financial Group Inc.
Dunas de Corralejo S.L.
Dupont Conseille AG
Dux Partners AG
Dörflinger
Dallüge
Deutsch
Dittel
Dierkes
Deubelbeiss
Dallinger
Drewitz
Eichhorn
Erber
Elbert
Ebner
Eroglu
Eschinger
Ettelt
Evcil
E-Money Power (EMPFX)
E.U.R.O.- Unternehmens- & Wirtschaftsberatungs- Ltd.
EAG AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT für WIRTSCHAFT
Earnshaw Advisory Services
Earthsearch Communications Inc.
Easy Concept Hamburg KG ( E@sy )
EBC AG
EBCON – Europäische Verbraucherberatung
Ebcon Europäische Verbraucherberatung AG
Ecco
Economy Capital Corporation
Ecotrend Holding AG
ECP Euro Caribbean Properties Ltd.
ECTO GmbH
Ecumoney Limited
Edgar Heumann GmbH
EECH AG
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
13
EEIG – Europäische Wirtschaftskammer
Effekten- und Edelmetallberatungs GmbH
Effinance Private Equity AG
EKC
Elbe Emissionshaus
Elefant Immobilien GmbH
EM.TV AG
EMA Event Management Agentur GmbH
Embdena
Emmerson Bennett
Empresa Minera (Bergbau) AG
Enexoma AG
Equinox Private Consultants Ltd.
ERGO-Plan
Erich Holderer Finanzdiestleistungen
ESKATA Finanz- Immobilien- Handels GmbH
ESTEKAR LIMITED
Estreel GmbH & Co.KG
EuMedien
Eurefi Eurefi Holding AG
Euregio Immobilien L&F B.V.
EURENTA Gesellschaft für Anlagen-, Renten- und Sparkonzeptionen GmbH
EURENTA Gesellschaft für Marketing- und Promotion GmbH
Euring GmbH
EURO CREDIT UNION
EURO Finanz Consult AG
Euro Finanz Management
Euro Kapital AG
Euro Real Investment Company
Euro Trading GmbH
Euro-American Beteiligungsvermittlungsg. MbH
EURO-CONSULT e.K.
Euro-Pool AG
EUROCAPITAL BANK INC.
Eurocapital Investment Corporation
EURODOM Berlin GmbH
Eurogoldtrader
Eurokapital AG
Eurolink Consult GmbH
European Estates&Investment AG
European Kings Club
European Trade marks and Designs
European Trademark Organisation S.A.
Europäische Schuldenregulierungs- und Ausgleichsanstalt
Europäische Wirtschaftskammer für Handel, Gewerbe und Industrie
EUROTRADE & CONSULTING AG
Eurotrust Capital Management
EV&K
Evantus Invest
EVD Direktverkaufs AG
EWR Wirtschaftsdatenregister
Exakt Martkanalysen Research GmbH
Exeltrade
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
14
Engels
Eder
Esser
Elas
Ehrenberg
Eilts
Eich
Eich
Eder
Engler
EISENBERG
 Felgner
Flug
Feyh
Freke
Florian
Fasan
Fritsch
Freiherr von Fink
Fink
Ferrera Dr. F & P Aktiengesellschaft & Co. KG
F.I.P. GmbH
F.V.F
FA. Haustein Finanzvermittlung
Fafa Capital
Faktor 1 GmbH
Falcon Euro Trading Limited
Falcon Oil Group
Falk Capital AG
Falk-Gruppe
Falken Depot Management GmbH
Falken GmbH
Falken Vermögensverwaltung GmbH
FALLON BANCROFT HOLDING
Fashionact Industries Inc.
Noske
FB Bauträger GmbH
FDMV FINANZDIENSTLEISTUNGEN
FFB Dörflinger GmbH
FFCC Verwaltungs GmbH & Co. Finanzdienstleistungs KG
FG Finanz-Service AG
FGP & Cie
Fibeg Finanzberatung- und Vermögensverwaltungs GmbH
Fibu AG
Fideles & Associates AG
Fidelity International
FIDU payment services S.A.
Finama Vermögensverwaltungs KG
Finance Concept GmbH
Finance Service International
Financial Consulting
Financial Consulting UK Limited
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
15
Financial Planning Systems Ltd.
Financieros Panama – Societaet Rodriguez Batista Diaz
Finanz Score GbR
Finanz Service Hennig
Finanzprogramme Bentley & Partner
FINANZtest Center
Finanzvermittlung Fritz Guth
Finanzvermittlung und Wirtschaftsdienst Ott GmbH
Finbrands Global Limited
Fine Trading Group Finvest Asset Management
FIPTR Federated Institute for Patent- &
Trademark Registry First Canadian Joint Venture
& Consulting Inc. First Canadian Joint Venture
& Consulting Inc. (Canada)
First China Corporate Management Group
First Garant Fund AG First Intercontinental
Bancorp. Ltd. First Invest Grundbesitz
GmbH First Invest Swiss Trade
First Real Estate Grundbesitz GmbH
First Saxonia Trading Ltd
Flash Finance Floris Bank
FOCUS Immobilien und Projektbau GmbH
FOKUS INVEST AG Foma Internationale
Inkassogesellschaft mbH
Fondax Capital Trust GmbH & Co. KG
Fondshaus Hamburg FORBIS Corporation
Force Worldwide Investments Corp
Foreign Exchange Clearing House Ltd.
Forest Finance Service GmbH
Forex4free Forexone-Broker
Forst Finance AG Four Stars AG
Frankonia Sachwert AG FRD International
Free Finance -Service Futura Finanz AG
Futura-Concept GmbH FXTSwiss
Fridez Fridez
Frau Floßbach
Fritz Franko
Frerichs Fink
Fridez Fasan
Filsinger
Freiherr von Lepel
Frydenlund Foetzsch
Fridez Fridez
Fitz
Grüters
Geyer
Gonnes
Grüner
Gerlach
Gast
Gräbedünkel
Gustav

GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
16
Güttig
Gläßer
Gehle
Gerome
GOLDEN-BALLARIN
Golsch
Gronemeyer
Görlich
Götzl
Gaber
Graupner
Guth
G+M Baubetreuung GmbH
G.V.V. bR.
G.W.F. Grundwert-Bauträger G.M.B.H
Gaiacor International PLC
Galant Immobilien GmbH
Garant Kreditvermittlung
Garant-Hundsdorff-Istanbul
GEBAB
Gebrüder Schmidtlein GbR
GEcoS Holding AG
Geldfinder GmbH
Gemas GmbH
Genius Insurance Service GmbH
Genius Investments – Genius Funds
Geoteck Inc.
Gerd Esser Grundbesitz GmbH
GerGermania Grundbesitz AG
Germania Venture Capital AG
Gesellschaft für Erbenermittlung
Gesellschaft für Exklusive Veranstaltungen Dortmund mbH
Gesellschaft für Finanz- u. Wirtschaftsdienstleistungen (FiWi)
Gesellschaft zur Datensicherung im Internet (GSDI)
Gesellschaft zur Vermittlung kapitalorientierter Finanzanlagen GmbH (GVFK)
GetAssisted Group
GfS Invest GmbH
GGHF Windpark Sitten GmbH & Co. KG
GHS Unternehmensgruppe
GIP Grundstücks-Immobilien & Projektmanagement GmbH
GIV Gesellschaft für Immobilien und Vermögensverwaltung mbH
Glatt & Partner GmbH
GLOBAL – BAU Immobilien GmbH
Global AWS AG
Global Capital Group
Global Cogenix Industrial Corp.
Global Financial Invest AG
Global Foreign Exchange (Switzerland) AG
GLOBAL LIFESTYLE GROUP S.A.
Global Mineral Resources Corp.
Global Pension Plan
Globaltraiding.com Kapitalmanagement
Globalus (Immobilien) Gmbh & Co. KG
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
17
GM Capital Partners
GMF Finanz AG
GMF Treuhandgesellschaft mbH
GO AHEAD SERVICE LTD
GOJ AG
Gold-Barren-Silber.com
Gold-Versandhandel
Goldstein & Partner Inc.
GOT Thimm GmbH
GPS GmGrand Capital Ltd
Great Berlin Wheel GmbH & Co. KG
Grevenreuth AG
Grund und Boden Beteiligungs AG
Grundstücksgemeinschaft Arslan
Grupo Esdinero
Grünewälder GmbH
GSM Gesellschaft für Professionelles Sachwert Management AG
GSM Gesellsc
GTO Gap Trading Online
Gulf Oil Exploration Inc.
GVW – Wirtschaftsclub
GWG Gesellschaft für Wirtschaftsplanung mbH
Göttinger Gruppe
Göttler Finanz AG
Graf
Guillaume
Gropper
Göker
Grotelaers
Günzel
Gelbke
Haugg
Halbey
Händel
Hansen
Heise
Hensel
Hipp
Hirner
Hirth
Heider
Hickl
Hansel
Hauser
Härtel
Heckler
Hambusch Prof.
Herold
Hering Dr.
Herr Budzinski
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
18
Heyer
Hering Dr.
Hartung
Hesselmann
Hettrich
Heiner
Händel
Heinrich
Hartl
Hansch
Hartung
Hepp
Heinekken van
Hanne
Heiliger
Heumann
Hensley-Piroth
Haffa
Holderer
Helfer
Heckmann
Hormann
Hennig
Hermsmeier
Hornberger
Halabi
Herr Gieselmann
Hundsdorff
Hanisch
Hornig
Hambusch Prof.
H.R.L. International
H2O Swiss AG
Hafenstein Marketing GmbH
Hamburg Connection
Hamilton Associates A.G.
Handelshaus Schaar
Handelskontor Fischer
Hansa Treuhand
Hanse Capital
Hanse Club
Hanseatische AG
Hanseatische Senatorenkanzlei
Hansefina GmbH
Hartl Immobilien
Hartl Immobilienmanagement GmbH
Harz Börde Finanz
Haus- und Vermögensverwaltung GmbH (HaVeWa)
Hauser Treuhand Rorschach HTR
Haushaltsfuchs
HB Capital Partners
HBW-Finanz AG
HCI Capital
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
19
HDL Hausdienstleistungsgesellschaft mbH
Helvag AG
Helvetia Treuhand GmbH
Helvetia Treuhand-Union GmbH
Hentsch & Müller S.A.
Hermes Beteiligungs AG
Hermes Portfolio Management GmbH
Bens
HKA-Bank 1954 Ltd.
HNH Finanzberatung-Treuhand GmbH
Horn Wolfgang Dr.
HouseFX AG
HTB Holding
HuHWH International AG
Hypo – Leasing B.V.
Heinen
Hagen
Hoff
Hensel
Hampe
Hauser Metzler
Harksen
Huber
Hartung
Hübner
Hönnscheidt
Hettrich
Hering Dr.
Hettrich
Hübner
Ihl
Izmirlioglu
Izmirlioglu
Immega
I-investorclub Ltd.
I.B.F.T.P.R. International Bureau for Federated Trademark Patent Register
I.B.I.P. International Bureau for Intellectual Property
I.F.I. Ltd. Milincic
IAZ & Partners
IBB GmbH
IBB INTERNATIONAL
IBEKA Immobilienbeteiligung AG
IBH Limited
ICB – Intercontinental Brokerage Corporation
ICM Basel
IContent GmbH
Idee Immo Concept GmbH
Idilei-Treuinvest
IFF AG Zukunftsunternehmen für Investment, Fonds, Finanzen
IFIC Integra Financial Consulting GmbH
IFS International Financial Services Inc.
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
20
IHB Immobilien Heinen & Biege GmbH
IKF
Immorenta Immobilienbeteiligungsgesellschaft mbH
Imperia Invest IBC
Indara Projekt AG
Indices International Group IIG
Info-ZentralInformations-Service-Center (ISC)
Inkasso Team Moskau / TMA GmbH
Innoflex
Innovatio Allfinanz & Franchise System AG
INT Elektrizitätswerk Beteiligungs KG
Integral Finanz AG
Integral Treuhand Vermögensverwaltung GmbH
Integro Capital Partners
Intellectual Property Agency Ltd.
Inter Alpen AG
Inter Capital Bank
Inter Capital Bank Ltd.
Inter Credit Group
Interbank Asset Management Group AG / InterBank AG
Intercontinental Financial Developments Plc.
Interessensgemeinschaft Barbara Merkens
Interfinance Investment & Credits
Interglob AG
INTERMEX International Ltd.
International Bioremediation Services Inc.
International Insurance Holding Inc.
International Invest Ltd
International Travel Services Ltd.
Internet Media AG
Internetwebshop
Inventaire Pro
Inveractivos
InvestInvestor Relations Corp.
Inveteratus Asset Management
IOPTS International Organization for Patent & Trademark Service Corporation
IPS AG – Internationale Produktvermarktungs Systeme
ISR Management & Consulting Ltd
ISS Immobilien Schutz und Service AG (ISS AG)
ISS Immobilienschutz und Service AG
ITL-Enterprises Inc.
Immega
Ibekwe
Just
Jochum
Jester
Junges
Jaeger Research GmbH
Jefferies Associates Group
Jejkal AG Strategische Investments
Johnsons Banking Group
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
21
Johnsons Banking Group
Joseph Cooke Ltd.
Julius Brown AG
Jump
Jachnicki
Jaufmann
Jansson
Jonas
Jedlitschka
Junghänel
Junghänel
Junghänel
Juratsch
Jentzer
Jilg
Jung
Karabunar
Kriewald
Knobloch
Kinner
Käner
Kontze
Kratz
Kostas
Körner
Keffel – Fallahi
Kaiser
Klein
Klaas
Krenzer
Kletsch
Kappes
Kloiber
Kiehl
Kappes
KlaffenböcKraushaar
Kleefisch
Krefft
Klaffenböck
Kaltofen
Kühnen
K & S -Frisia
K&K. B. P. Vermögensverwaltung
K1 Group
K1-Group
Kaikatsu Group
Kanzlei Knil
Kanzlei Range & Partner
Kapital-Consult GmbH
Karriere AG
Köllner-Unternehmensgruppe
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
22
König & Cie
KCP Bank
Kingside Establishment
Kirkland Lee
KK ImmobilienFonds I AG & Co. KG a.A.
Kleeblatt4U
Koch & Eilts GmbH & Co. KG
Koh-I-Noor
Konnex ImmoInvest GmbH
Konsumgüter Direktvertrieb e.V
Kredit einfach Vermittlungs GmbH
Krug Immobilien GmbH
KSF Korrespondenz-Service für Finanzsysteme
KSK International Ltd.
KubKusch und Partner GmbH
Kutag Capital Partners AG
Kutag Group
Kuwait Finance & Investment Company
KVG Internationale Kapitalvermittlung
KVV-Profi Management- und Beteiligung AG
KWD-Marketing
Kühne Bauspar- und Finanzierungsfachbüro
Küng & Partner Vermögensverwaltung AG
Klaffenböck
Klostermann
Keiner
Klappenbach
Klappenbach
Kastler
Kuzmanovic
Kraus
Keil
Kulecki
Kahnhäuser
Klein
Kuhlee
Karabunar
K.
Knobloch
Kiok
Klinge
Koehn
Kuhlen
Lebinger
Lorenz
Luft
Lampe
Leonhard
LehnoLohmann
Lohmann
Lee
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
23
Leindecker
Lökkevik
Lucky Prices S.L.
Lepel Freiherr von
Lemke
Linder
Littig
Langanke
Limburg
Laubach
Lins
Lüthi
LAM Immobilien- und Beteiligungs AG
Landesbank Berlin – LBB/IBV Fonds
Landmark Invest Ltd.
Lange Vermögensberatung GmbH
Lange Vermögensberatung GmbH
Langenbahn AG
LBB-Fonds
LDG Capital Markets Company Limited
Lenz Immobilienhandel AG
Life
Lifetime Products Inc.
Liquid Asset Management Inc.
Lisser Consulting
Litz United GmbH & Co. KG
Locat – Projektsteuerung GmbH
Locstein Asset Management AG
Logotype Klostermann, Lässig
London Hong Kong Exchange plc
LPA Financial Services
LSC. Ltd.
Ltd. Ifi
LVA Garant Fund Inc.
Lichtenfels
Lenz
Leuze
Lengdorfer
Lutz
Marien
Möbius
Müller
Müller
Mohm
Morgenstern
Markof
Müller Dr.
Mathy
Müller
Miersch
Matten
24
Moulatsiotis
MichalMatthiesen
Milincic
Matthies
Merkens
Marx
Meyer
Madden Group Inc.
Magnus GmbH&CO KG
MALAYSIA Credit
Malaysiacredit Van Bergen Corp.
Mallorca Trading
Malmsbury, Harrington and Seaford
Maonara AG
Marine Shuttle AS
Marine Shuttle Operations Inc.
Mark Marketing S.R.O.
Matic-Verlagsgesellschaft mbH
Matterhorn International
Mayer und Cie GmbH
MC Management Consulting & Financial Services
MCC Mariaux Chevre & Cie
McKenzie-Boyle Associates
Med-Synergy Mallorca GmbH & Co. KG
Media Concepte
Media Inkassomanagement AG
Media-Com LTD & Co. KG
Medivest
MEG AG
Mercaforex – Silver Holdings International Ltd.
Mercantus AG
Mercury Forex Investments Assets Ltd.
Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd
METROPOL LEASING GMBH
MFIVE Ltd.
MFS 24
MG Beteiligungs AG
MICONA LTD.
MidAtlantic Holdings plc
Minera Real del Barqueno S.A.
Mitschka Alternative Advisory
MJS Developments S.A.
MK Service & Vertrieb
MK- Service & Vertrieb
MMC Medialog Marketing Company
MMCIS Investments
Mobilica.de
MOLY-FLON LIMITED
Money and Capital ASS.
Money Plus Worldwide Financial Limited
MonMach Marine Insurance Company Ltd.
Morgan Franklin Investment Inc.
MPC Capital
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
25
MPC Capital AG
Mueller Capital Management (MCM)
Multi Advisor Fund I GbR
MWB Vermögensverwaltungs AG
Mehler
MÖLLER-BÜCKINS
Montag
Morris
Manns
Meyer
Mundt
MILLS
McGregor
Müller
 Nicolic
Noske
Neumann
Naumann
Nieder
Noske
Nitsche
Natea Financial Transactions Division
Nationales Markenregister AG
Natur- und Erlebniswelt Schmölln GmbH
NEO TECH PUBLISHING COMPANY INC.
Net Mobile AG
Netsolutions FZE
NEUBERT & PARTNER FINANZMANAGEMENT GMBH
Neuburg Financial AG
Neue Medien GmbH
New Century Capital
NEW Naturpark und Erlebniswelt Schmölln
New World Financial
Newton Forest
Noble Advisory Group
Nodorf und Partner
Non plus ultra Marketing GmbH
Nord Finanz KG
Nord-Analyse/Jürgen Harksen
Nordcapital
Norddeutsche Vermögensverwaltung
North Am GmbH
NOVI BETEILIGUNGS GMBH
NUEVO GMBH
NWK Consulting
NYTS New York Trading Services Ltd.
Nünlist
Noack
 Ohles
Ohlmann
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
26
Obermann
Ohlenschläger
Ottersbach
O Online Casino
OBA OBJEKTPLANUNGS UND BAUGESELLSCHAFT MBH
Obtime GmbH
Ocean s Continental AG
EKOFINANZ PIPER & FISCHER (ÖKOFINANZ)
Offshore Shuttle AS
Olaf Tank – Rechtsanwalt
OLF OBERLAUSITZER FACTORING UND LEASING GMBH
OMNIKRON VERWALTUNGSGESELLSCHAFT MBH
Soldwisch
Optimal-Unternehmensgruppe
Opus one Corporation
Organi Juris GmbH
ORGANIJURIS HOLDING AG
Ost Com Holding AG
Ownership Emissionshaus
Ommer
Oberle
Olek
 Petrenko
Prehn
Piroth
Pelz
Pfeiffer
Piroth
Pirkel
Pirkel
Petsch
Pröckel
Pirkel
Pilling
Pirkel
Paco Integrated Energy Inc.
Pacon Capital S.A.
Pacta Invest GmbH
PACTA-INVEST GmbH
Partner Air Limited
Partner-Computer-Group Ltd.
PayPay Inc.
PayPay S.a.r.l.
PCG
Pentafox Höhn OHG
Pepper United S.R.O.
Perfect4u
Pharma Kontor AG
Phillip Alexander Securities & Futures Ltd.
Phoenix Kapitaldienst GmbH
Phönix Aktiengesellschaft
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
27
Phönix Finanzsanierungs AG
Platinum Group International
Platonja GmbH
Plim Cooperation AG
PLUS CONCEPT GMBH
Plus Finanz Consulting GmbH
Postbank Finanzberatung AG
PPV Produkt-Promotion-Vertrieb
Pradofin
Premium Capital
Premium Firmenservice GmbH
Prime Core AG
Prime Gold Invest AG
Prime Select AG
Primus Consulting Optionshandel GmbH
Prinz zu Hohenlohe Jagstberg & Banghard GmbH
Private Commercial Office (PCO)
Private Equity Capital Group
Private Equity Invest AG
Private Fiduciary Trust GmbH
Private Investment Brokers and Financial Fonds Inc.
PRIZMA F.A. CENTER
Profi Moderne Wohnungsbaugenossenschaft
Profit.sawas.info
Projekta GmbH
Projostar GmbH
Prokon Kapital GmbH
Protectas Vermögensberatung GmbH
Protected International Inc.
PS-Leasing
Piroth
Petry
 Quinz
QES – Die Geldarchitekten
Quantum Asset Management
Quatro Group
QUEEN GMBH
Quinz Jürgen
Quorum AG
 Riesen van
Reegen
Riviera
Rose
Reinke
Ruppert
Rautenberg
Rüdenauer
Rist
Röll
Rohde
Runyeon
Rieß de Sanchez
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
28
Rachensperger
Ramin
Rohde
Range
Reich
Rummelt
Runyeon
Reimers
Rohbeck
R&S GmbH
R.A.P. Vermögensanlagen-Aktiengesellschaft & Co. KG Immobilienverwaltung
Racingkasino.Com
Rainbow Real Estate Ltd.
Ralph Hübner Verlag
Ranston Ltd
Ranston Ltd.
Ravena Finanz Management AG
RDV GmbH
Real Estate AG
Rechtsanwalt Asmus
Register of Commerce – Markenregisterverzeichnis
Renko & Associates
Renta / Löwer
Rentmeister KG
Res Justitia GmbH
Residencia GmbH
Rheinisch Westfälische Grundbesitz AG
Richmond & Palmer Investments Inc
Riverblue GmbH
RK-invest intern. Ltd.
RKI Invest
RKV Finanzservice
Robyns Capital GmbH
Robyns Vermögensverwaltung GmbH
Rodman & Shaw Ltd.
Rontax-Treuhand
Rosiak Dr.
Ruhrstrom GmbH
Ruluso Holding Ltd.
Rushton Limited
Ruspa Capital AG
Ruyan Europe
Richter
Reime
Richtsteig
Rademann
Rippel
 Sälinger
Schwarz
Stefan
Storm
Seuchter
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
29
Seumenicht
Schaefer
Scholl
Siegert
Schuhmann
Scharl
STRÖMBERG
Stanley
Splisteser
Sablowski
Schwarz
Stumpf
Scholz
Steigenberger
Schmidt
Seebacher
Sümper
Steuten
Schwartz
Simon
Schrämli
Spilker
Spanier
Seci
Stolte
Stolte
Schmid
Schmid
Schroeder
Seidel
Schmidtlein
Stangl
Steinbach
Stecker
Szulc
Schäfer
Spilker
Scholl
Stadelmaier
Shadi
Schäfer
Schmidt
Schaul
Sulser -Eggenberger
Schwarz
Sch.
S.
Schroeder Dr.
Schierloh
Sinn
Soldwisch
Smith
Schmidt
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
30
Schrenk
Schieweck
Schmidt
S.
Schmid
S&K Deutsche Sachwert AG
S.B.E. Bank
S.B.E. Financial SA
S.L.I.C.E AG
Sachsen Planke GmbH
Sachsenpark AG
Safe Inrest Quota Obtain Ltd (auch bekannt unter SIQO)
Sagro
Sakura Financial Group
SAM FINANZ AG – Swiss Asset Management
San West Inc.
Sauer & Söhne
Saxonia Sparkasse Inc.
SBAG – Schweizerische Börsenabwicklungsgesellschaft mbH
Schmid Immobilien Ltd.
Schmiedendorf Arzneimittelvertrieb AG
Schuhbecks am Platzl GmbH
Schutzvereinigung der Versicherten, Sparer und Kapitalanleger e. V.
Schwabenland Büro
Schweizer Kapital AG
SCT Bank Ltd.
SD Global Equity AG & Co. KG
Seabed Invest AG
SEB Bank AG
Sebeka GmbH
Secured Communications Limited
Securenta AG
Securities Regulatory and Investment Board (SRIB)
Senior Invest
Servicebüro Natter
SFP Private Banking
SFR AG (Swiss Finance Research AG)
Sherwood Henderson Limited
Shibby & Partners
Sigma Leasing Ltd.
Sigma Trading Limited
Signature Equities Agency GmbH
Signum Edelsteine GmbH
Sisko System Haus AG
Skyline Advisory Group
Solatera Energy AG
Sole Invest GmbH
Solventa Finanzservice GmbH
Sophisticated Investor Inc.
SP Trade Investment Capital Ltd. / SP Trader Fund
Sparkasse Dortmund
Spree Finanz AG
Spree-Capital GmbH
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
31
Star Invest
Stebo GmbH
Steinberg Investment Research AG
Steinberg Investments Ltd.
Stephens Capital Markets Limited
Sterling Asset Management AG
STIFX (stifxonline.com)
Stifxonline.com
Stonehard Consulting d.o.o.
Stratton & Partner
Stratton Wainwright
Suisse Banking
Suisse Life Securities
Sunset Handelsgesellschaft Unternehmergesellschaft
SVK Marketing GmbH
SVM24Direkt
SWAG – Schweizerische Wertpapierabrechnungsgesellschaft AG
SWD Sächsischer Wirtschaftsdienst
Swiss Agricole Asset Management
Swiss Basis GmbH
Swiss Bellair Bank
Swiss Credit Trust AG
SWISS DIVISION
Swiss Finance Conceptions & Marketing AG
SWISS Finance Consult
Swiss Finance Consult AG
Swiss Finance Consult AG
Swiss Finance Research AG
Swiss Key Equity Consult AG
Swiss Lotto – Gesellschaft Schweizer Zahlenlotto
Swiss Lotto Agency
Swiss Lotto Highstakes
Swiss Marketing GmbH
Swiss Siam Investment Club
Swiss Trading
Swiss World Cyber Lottery International – Swiss Lottery
Swiss-American Capital Management Institute,Inc.
SwissAudit Aktiengesellschaft
SwissKap AG
Swisskontor GmbH
Swissridge International Corp.
Switzerland Investment Group
Süddeutsche Stabak AG
Süddeutsche Stabak Aktiengesellschaft AG
Südwestbank AG
System Vorsorge Kapitalvermittlung (SVK)
Schmuck
Simon
Schlag
Sonntag
Schellscheidt
Schildbach
Schmidt
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
32
Surowiec
 Tzolov
Tannenbaum
Thomson
Tucholke
Traxel
Teller
Trisl
TOBER
Tausch
Trice
Thimm
Turgut
Tank
T.K. Immobilien GmbH
Taipan
Talis Enterprise GmbH
Task Force Service GmbH
Taurus GmbH
TBC-Marketing AG
Telba GmbH
Tele Inside s.r.o.
Tellba GMBH
The Crown Group CH
The Vale Group / Vale Group InvestmentsVale Group Asset Management /
Thomas Moore
Titan
Titan Trading Group
TiViBo GmbH
Tortola Capital
Trade Direct GmbH
Transatlantic Business & Management Ltd.
TRC Telemedia e.K.
Treberhilfe Berlin gGmbH
Treff Hotel Beteiligung
Trend Capital AG
Treu-Control Wirtschaftsberatungs- und Treuhandgesellschaft mbH
Treulux AG
Tri-Hub International
Triagon Holding AG
Trias Erste KG
Trias Zweite KG
Trikom Consulting GmbH
Trinity Ventures
TSI Consulting
TSI-Consulting
Turner Mayfield Advisory A.G.
TVI Express
Two For 1 Sportsbook
TXL Business Academy GmbH
TXL Capital Management GmbH
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
33
Tang
Täubert
 Ullmann
Uhlendorff
UBS Deutschland AG
UFB VERMITTLUNGSGESELLSCHAFT MBH
UFP
UGV Inkasso
Ulrich Engler Daytrading
Ulrich Petry
ULRICH VERLAG KG
ULRICH- VERLAG KG
Unabhängige Wirtschaftskanzlei Wolfgang Gelbke
Unia Holding AG
Unia Industrie Holding AG
Unispar Banque PLC
United Invest Management Deutschland Ltd & Co. KG
United Investors
United Markets (Asia) Limited
United Network Industries (Uni AG)
United Re-Insurance Group
United Trust Bank Plc.
United Trust of Switzerland S.A
United Trust of Switzerland S.A.
Unitymedia Hessen GmbH & Co KG
Universal Settlements International (USI) Inc.
Univest Limited
Univesta
Univesta Björk Immobilien und Anlage GmbH & Co.
Unternehmensgruppe Esdinero
UOT Financial Services Limited
US GOLD INTERNATIONAL LTD.
US Securities Agency (USSA)
Usecom Software AG
 Volkmann
Völl
Vitor
Voß
van Dien
van Dyken
Voll
von Eugen
Varin
Varin
Vejpustek
Volk
Vogel
von Krauthahn
V-O-B Handelsgesellschaft mbH
V/F Operation Leasing GmbH
VABA AG
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
34
ValueMaker
VALUTA VERMÖGENSVERWALTUNG GMBH
VanFunds / Vandior Inc.
Vanilla
VCI
Ventana Biotech Inc.
Ventono Capital GmbH
Venture Associates
Verbraucherdienst.e.V
Verimount FZE
Versicherungsdienst
Vertex Commodities
Verum Placement Ltd.
Vierte Juragent GmbH & Co. Prozesskostenfonds KG
VIT EnvironmentSystems AG
Vitascanning AG
Viva Tenerife Services
Volkssolidarität Sozial-Immobilien GmbH
Volkssolidarität Sozialimmobilienfonds GmbH & Co. KG
 Wood
Wächter
Wintzler
Willer
Wiedenbauer
Walkemeyer
Weimer
Walkemeyer
Wolter
Wolter
Wagner
W.
Wagner
Wolfram
Wolfram
Werner Dr.
Wagner
Wulff
Wagner
Weislogel
Walker
Wagner
WABAG – Wirtschaftsanalyse und Beratung AG
Wagner Finanzvermittlung GmbH
Wahl + Partner GmbH
Warrick Management Group Ltd.
Waterman Associates
WBwso Ltd
Wconstrukt
Wealth and Asset Planning
Webtains GmbH
Weizman Associates
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
35
Weizman Associates LLC
Wellshire Securities GmbH
West Atlantic Credit Group
WESTGATE Financial AG
Westminster Financial Management Ltd
Weyhill Establishments
WFB sro
White Birds Germany GmbH
Whitherspoon, Seymour & Robinson Corp.
Who is Who Prominentenenzyklopädie AG
WIBAG Immobilien und Beteiligung Aktiengesellschaft
Wicon Wirtschafts- und Finanzkontor Betz & Kronacher Beteiligungsgesellschaft
WIETEC-Germany
WIG – Wirtschaftszentrale für Industrie und Gewerbe AG
WIHH – Wirtschaftsinstitut für Industrie, Handel, Handwerk AG
WILL GMBH FINANZBERATUNG & VERWALTUNG
William Smith Partners
Wilton Investment Group
WiRe AG
Wirtschafts- und Finanzberatung Lindow-Giebel
Wirtschaftskanzlei Jilg GmbH
Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft Contor GmbH
WNB Finanzanlagen AG
Wohnbaufinanz
Wohnungsbaugesellschaft Leipzig West AG
Wohnungsbaugesellschaft Leipzig-West AG
Wonsei AG
Woodbridge Business Corp.
World Capital Group
World Capital Holding Corporation
WORLD MEDIA FONDS
World Telecom Data
WorldClearing Holding Inc.
Worldexchange
WorldFX-club
WSR – Whitherspoon, Seymour & Robinson Corporation
Würzburger Aktiengesellschaft für Vermögensbeteiligungen und Verwaltung (WAG)
 X Com Ltd.
Ximex Executive Ltd
XYZ NOMINEES LTD
 Y2M Media Limited
YESILADA BANK LTD.
Young Media Spain S.L.
Yuca Park
 Ziedd
Zeitler
Zürbis
Zimmermann
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
Zimmermann
Zürbis
Zietlow
Zürbis
Zollweg
Zürbis
Zensen-Döring
Z.E.N.I.T. AG
ZAK Inkasso
Zapf Creation
ZBI Zentral Boden Immobilien AG
ZDR-Datenregister GmbH
ZeBo GmbH
ZECH & ZECH VERMÖGENSVERWALTUNG GMBH
Zeder Immobilien Treuhand AG
ZEDER INVESTMENT AG
Zenith Commodities Ltd
ZENKER WOHNBAU AG
Zentrum für Wirtschaftspraxis
Zinnwald Financiers
Zucomex The Zurich Commodities Exchange
Zurich Capital Gruppe
Zurich Direct

Opfer in 2011:

– Angela Merkel

– Wolfgang Schäuble

– Accessio AG

– Allianz Global Investors

– Antek International

– Andreas Decker

– Anna Schwertner

– Bank of America

– Barclays

– Bernd Müller

– Bernd Pulch

– Beluga

– Bliznet Group Inc.

– Centrum Immobilien

– Citigroup

– Coldwell Banker

– Commerzbank

– CPA Capital Partners

– Credit Suisse

– CSA

– CWI

– Debiselect

– D.E.U.S.eG – Jürgen Oswald

– Deutsche Bank

– Deutsche Anstalt für Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht

– DKB Bank

– Dr. Paul Jensen

– Ekrem Redzepagic

– Erste Mai GmbH

– Express Kurier Europa

– Financial Services Regulatory Authority of Frankfurt

– FRONTAL 21

– Garbe

– General Global Media

– Genfer Kreditanstalt

– HCI

– HSBC

– HypoLeasing

– Indara

– JPMorgan Chase

– Kreis Sparkasse Tübingen

– Leipziger Bauträger (etliche Firmen, hier subsummiert)

– Lloyds Bank

– Lothar Berresheim

– Martina Oeder

– Martin Sachs

– Meridian Capital

– Money Pay

– Norinchukin Bank

– Oak Tree

– Prime Estate

– Prosperia Mephisto 1 GmbH & Co KG

– Raiffeisen- und Volksbanken

– Rothmann & Cie.

– Stefan Schramm

– Teldafax

– TipTalk.com

– Wirecard

Natürlich alles OHNE IRGENDEINEN BEWEIS VON VORBESTRAFTEN SERIENBETRÜGERN AUF EINER HOMEPAGE MIT KEINER ECHTEN PERSON IM IMPRESSUM STATTDESSEN MIT EINER NEW YORKER BRIEFKASTENADRESSE IM AUFTRAG MUTMASSLICH VON RA JOCHEN RESCH UND RA MANFRED RESCH, PETER EHLERS UND GERD BENNEWIRTZ -UND UNTER MITARBEIT VON GOOGLE, DEUTSCHLAND,

ALS “FRONTMANN” VON “GOMOPA” AGIERT DER DUTZENDWEISE VORBESTRAFTE KLAUS MAURISCHAT UNTER ANDEREM WEGEN BETRUGES AN SEINEM EIGENEN ANLEGER

Das Urteil gegen„GoMoPa“-Maurischat: Betrug am eigenen Anleger wg € 10.000,-

110401 6 GoMoPa SJB Opferlisteh
Die Verurteilung von Klaus Maurischat und Mark Vornkahl wegen Betruges am eigenen Anleger Klaus Maurischat und Mark Vornkahl, Betreiber vonwww.gomopa.net: Am 24. April 2006 war die Verhandlung am Amtsgericht Krefeld in der Betrugssache: Mark Vornkahl / Klaus Maurischat ./. Dehnfeld. Aktenzeichen: 28 Ls 85/05 Klaus MaurischatLange Straße 3827313 Dörverden.Das in diesem Verfahren ausschließlich diese Betrugsache verhandelt wurde, ist das Urteil gegen Klaus Maurischat recht mäßig ausgefallen.Zusammenfassung der Verhandlung vom 24.04.2006 vor dem Schöffengericht des AG Krefeld in der Sache gegen Klaus Maurischat und Mark Vornkahl.Zur Hauptverhandlung erschienen:Richter Dr. Meister, 2 Schöffen,Staatsanwalt, Angeklagter Klaus Maurischat, vertr. durch RA Meier, Berlin; aus der U-Haft zur Verhandlung überführt.1. Eine Gerichtsvollzieherin stellt unter Ausschuss der Öffentlichkeit eine Urkunde an den Angeklagten Maurischat zu.2. Bei Mark Vornkahl wurde im Gerichtssaal eineTaschenpfändung vorgenommen.Beginn der HauptverhandlungDie Beklagten verzichten auf eine Einlassung zu Beginn.Nach Befragung des Zeugen Denfeld zum Sachverhalt wurde dieVerhandlung auf Wunsch der Staatsanwaltschaft und den Verteidigern unterbrochen.Der Angeklagte Maurischat gab nach Fortsetzung derHauptverhandlung Folgendes zu Protokoll:Er sähe ein, dass das Geld auf das falsche Konto gegangen sei und nicht dem eigentlichen Verwendungszweck zugeführt wurde. Das Geld sei aber zurückgezahlt worden und er distanziere sich ausdrücklich von einem Betrug.Schließung der BeweisaufnahmeDer Staatsanwalt verließt sein PlädoyerEr halte am Vorwurf des Betruges fest. Mit Hinweis auf die einschlägigen Vorstrafen des Angekl. Maurischatund auf laufende Ermittlungsverfahren, beantrage er ein Strafmaß von 1 Jahr und 6 Monaten.Er halte dem Angeklagten zu Gute, dass dieserWiedergutmachung geleistet habe, und dass dieser geständig war. Zudem läge die letzte Verurteilung wegen Betruges 11 Jahre zurück. Auch sei der Geschädigte nicht in existentielle Not geraten, wobei der Staatsanwalt nicht über noch laufende Verfahren hinweg sehen könne. Er läge aber dem Angeklagten Maurischat nahe, keine weiteren Aktivitäten im Bezirk der Staatsanwaltschaft Krefeld auszuüben, insbesondere möchte er, dass keine weiteren Anleger im Bezirk der Staatsanwaltschaft Krefeld durch GoMoPa akquiriert werden.Die Freiheitsstrafe soll zur Bewährung ausgesetzt werden.Plädoyer des Verteidigers des Angekl. Maurischat, Herrn RA MeierEr schließe sich, wie (in der Unterbrechung) vereinbart, dem Staatsanwalt an.Es stimme, dass sein Mandant Fehler in seiner Vergangenheit gemacht habe, und dass er auch diesmal einen Fehler begangen haben könnte, jedoch sei der Hinweis wichtig, dass sein Mandant aus diesen Fehlern gelernt habe.Der Angeklagte haben das letzte Wort.Maurischat sagt, es sei bereits alles gesagt worden.Unterbrechung zu Hauptverhandlung. Der Richter zieht sich mit den Schöffen zur Beratung zurück.Urteilsverkündung:Der Angeklagte wird des gemeinschaftlichen Betrugs für schuldig befunden.Der Angeklagte Klaus Maurischat wird zu einerFreiheitsstrafe von 1 Jahr und 6 Monaten verurteilt. Diese wird zur Bewährung ausgesetzt.Die Bewährungszeit wird auf 3 Jahre festgesetzt.Der Haftbefehl gegen Klaus Maurischat wird aufgehoben.Der Angeklagte trage die Kosten des Verfahrens.UrteilsbegründungDer Richter erklärt, dass eine Täuschung des Geschädigtenvorliegt und somit keine Untreue in Betracht kommen kann.Die Fragen, ob es sich um einen Anlagebetrug handele sei irrelevant. Er hält den Angeklagten die geleistete Wiedergutmachung zu Gute.Ebenso ist das Geständnis für die Angeklagten zu werten. Zudem liegt die letzte Verurteilung des Angeklagten Maurischat 11 Jahre zurück.Die Parteien verzichten auf Rechtsmittel. Das Urteil ist somit rechtskräftig.Mit dem heutigen Urteil endet ein Kapitel in derBetrugssache Goldman Morgenstern & Partners, Klaus Maurischat und Mark Vornkahl.Alle GoMoPa.net Verantwortlichen, Maurischat, Vornkahl und Henneberg sind nun vorbestrafte Abzocker und Betrüger und die Zukunft der Pseudoklitsche GoMoPa.net sieht duster aus.Mir dem Geständnis der beiden ABZOCKER MAURISCHAT UND VORNKAHL vor Gericht bricht ein jahrelangaufrechterhaltenes Lügengeflecht von einigen primitiven Betrügern zusammen. Gewohnheitsverbrecher und Denunzianten,die rechtschaffene Personen und Firmen in ihren Verbrecherforen kriminalisierten.

Süddeutsche Zeitung über die fingierten “GoMoPa” und Ihre kriminellen Methoden

SZ_03.09.2010_Am_virtuellen_Pranger

FAZ – Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung (FAZ) über die realen Wirtschaftskriminellen der fingierten “GoMoPa”

http://www.faz.net/s/RubEC1ACFE1EE274C81BCD3621EF555C83C/Doc~EB5651ECDC72949FF907D2CA89D5AFE72~ATpl~Ecommon~Scontent.html

Börse Online über die Wirtschaftsterroristen der fingierten “GoMoPa” – Hauptfinanzier Jochen Resch

Gomopa

Anwälte als Finanzierungsquelle

Von Renate Daum

Taschenrechner, Bleistift © dpa
Taschenrechner, Bleistift

Der Anlegeranwalt Jochen Resch kommt neuerdings oft in den Pressemitteilungen vor, die der Finanzdienst Gomopa ungefragt an Redaktionen verschickt. Als „Deutschlands bekannteste Anlegerschutzkanzlei“ wird Resch Rechtsanwälte in einem Bericht über das Ende der Noa Bank vorgestellt. Zu Schrottimmobilien äußert sich Resch, zu einem Skandal um den Immobilienfondsanbieter Volkssolidarität. Die Offenheit ist neu. Früher ging Gomopa Resch hart an und konfrontierte ihn mit Vorwürfen. Doch einige Formulierungen in einer Teilhaberinformation zur finanziellen Situation Gomopas vom Juli 2010 legen nahe, dass der Sinneswandel vielleicht nicht nur Zufall ist.

Gomopa, eigentlich Goldman Morgenstern & Partners Consulting LLC mit Sitz in New York, ist seit mehr als zehn Jahren aktiv. Auf der Website ist unter den Fachautoren der bekannte Bestsellerautor Jürgen Roth aufgelistet. Im Handelsregister der deutschen Zweigniederlassung ist als Geschäftszweck an erster Stelle „wirtschaftliche Beratung, insbesondere des Mittelstandes“ aufgelistet. Dazu gehöre „die Präsentation von Firmen im Internet und anderen Medien“. Die Verbindung des Dienstes mit einem Nachrichtenportal im Internet sieht Gomopa-Gründer Mark Vornkahl nicht als Problem: „Ein Interessenkonflikt zwischen kostenpflichtiger Beratung, Informationsabonnement und öffentlicher Aufklärung ist uns seit Bestehen nicht untergekommen.“

Anwalt Resch spricht von Rechercheauftrag

Doch die Nutzer des Portals erfuhren bislang nicht, ob mit Personen oder Organisationen, über die berichtet wurde, vertragliche Beziehungen bestehen. Reschs Kanzlei war laut Teilhaberinformation zeitweise eine wichtige Finanzierungsquelle von Gomopa. Darin berichtet Gomopa-Mitgründer Klaus Maurischat, dass eine Vereinbarung mit der Kanzlei „momentan 7500,- Euro im Monat einbringt – rund 25 Prozent unserer monatlichen Kosten!“. Für „individuelle Mandantenanwerbung“ stehe die Gesellschaft mit mehreren Anwaltskanzleien in Verhandlungen.Anwalt Resch stellt zum Inhalt der Vereinbarung klar: „Wir haben einen einmaligen Rechercheauftrag erteilt, der im üblichen Rahmen honoriert wird.“ Mit Mandantenbeschaffung habe das nichts zu tun. Was Gomopa von einer Mandantenanwerbung hätte, ist auch unklar. Denn Anwälte dürfen dafür nicht bezahlen. Auf unsere Anfrage zu dieser und weiteren Fragen gab Vornkahl keine inhaltliche Antwort beziehungsweise verwahrte sich gegen Zitate aus den entsprechenden Passagen seiner E-Mail, weil er einem Mitbewerber „keine Auskünfte zur Ausgestaltung unseres Geschäftsbetriebes gebe“. Das verblüfft, denn BÖRSE ONLINE betreibt das Anlegerschutzportal http://www.graumarktinfo.de, ist aber keine Unternehmensberatung. Gomopa betont dagegen, nichts mit Anlegerschutz zu tun zu haben.

Bauträgergesellschaft als wichtige Finanzquelle

Eine wichtige Finanzierungsquelle von Gomopa war laut der Teilhaberinformation auch eine Bauträgergesellschaft, gegen die Anwalt Resch im Auftrag von Anlegern vorgegangen war. Im Zusammenhang mit deren Muttergesellschaft Estavis war Gomopa sogar schon mit Nötigungsvorwürfen konfrontiert worden. Als ein umstrittener Anlegerschützer einen Vertrag des Immobilienkonzerns mit Gomopa in die Hände bekam, las er eine Erpressung hinein. Auf seine Anzeige hin nahm die Staatsanwaltschaft aber nicht einmal Ermittlungen auf. „Estavis wurde nicht erpresst“, stellt ein Sprecher der Immobilienfirma klar. Die Estavis-Tochter B&V schloss sogar einen neuen Beratungsvertrag ab und zahlte viermal 5000 Euro – in gegenseitigem Einvernehmen, wie der Estavis-Sprecher betont.

Jüngst kam nun der Wirtschaftsdetektiv Medard Fuchsgruber – Aushängeschild und Kooperationspartner von Gomopa – ins Gerede. Bevor das Bündnis besiegelt wurde, bekam er im Frühjahr 2010 einen Auftrag aus Kassel, wie die „Süddeutsche Zeitung“ berichtet. Der Wirtschaftsdetektiv sollte herausfinden, wer hinter üblen Angriffen und Erpressungsversuchen gegen Immovation stecke. In einem zweiten, davon unabhängigen Schritt sollte Fuchsgruber versuchen, böse Berichte und Kommentare bei Gomopa über das Immobilienhandelsunternehmen zu unterbinden. Insgesamt erhielt er dafür 67 500 Euro.

Glaubwürdigkeitsproblem bei Seriositätsüberprüfung

Kurz darauf, im Juni, gab Gomopa die Kooperation mit dem Detektiv bekannt. Der Finanzdienst publizierte zudem erneut Negatives. Die schockierten Immovation-Vorstände zeigten Fuchsgruber an. Der Detektiv weist alle Vorwürfe von sich. Mit Kundenverrat habe das im Übrigen gar nichts zu tun. Auch mit der Ausrichtung des Partners hat er keine Probleme. Gomopa gebe schließlich keine Empfehlungen und bewerte Produkte und Emittenten nicht. „Wäre das der Fall, wäre das nicht akzeptabel“, ergänzt er. Doch genau das hat Gomopa nun vor. Eine „Seriositätsüberprüfung“ plane Gomopa, berichtet Maurischat den Teilhabern. Das solle Emittenten 1499 Euro für eine Erstüberprüfung und dann 999 Euro pro Jahr kosten. Er rechnet dabei 500 Euro Provision ein, sodass für die Überprüfung ein dreistelliger Betrag übrig bliebe. Das wäre extrem wenig.Gomopa dürfte ohnehin ein Glaubwürdigkeitsproblem haben, denn der Dienst fiel mit falschen oder fragwürdigen Äußerungen auf. So gibt es laut Website 57 345 Mitglieder (Stand 21. September 2010). Die Mitgliedschaft ist bis auf einen einmonatigen Test kostenpflichtig. Einnahmen aus den Beiträgen beziffert Maurischat in seiner Information aber nur auf um die 5000 Euro. Selbst wenn alle Mitglieder die günstigste Variante gewählt haben, ergäben sich rechnerisch weit weniger als 1000 zahlende Mitglieder. Gomopa äußert sich dazu nicht.

Umzug soll Anwälten Arbeit erschweren

Und es gibt noch mehr Probleme: Ein Minister sei auf einen Vorstand von Immovation hereingefallen, hatte Gomopa berichtet. Eine Ente, deren Weiterverbreitung gerichtlich verboten wurde. Im Fall Wirecard hatte ein Bericht die Aktie abstürzen lassen. Hinterher stellte sich heraus, dass die zentrale Aussage falsch war.

Als „größtes Problem“ schildert Maurischat Teilhabern die „sprunghaft gestiegenen Kosten für juristische Beratung“, seit die Zweigniederlassung in Deutschland eröffnet worden sei. Dadurch sei es Anwälten gelungen, einstweilige Verfügungen und Ähnliches zuzustellen, mit denen Äußerungen untersagt würden. Eine Lösung dafür präsentiert Maurischat den Teilhabern auch gleich. Ein System zur Fehlervermeidung? Nein. Die Liquidierung der deutschen Zweigniederlassung. Es schwebe ihnen vor, den Sitz der Verwaltung von New York in die Schweiz zu verlagern und den Ort der Geschäftsentscheidung nach Spanien. Und das erschwere Rechtsanwälten die Arbeit, die gegen Gomopa vorgehen wollten.

Quelle: BÖRSE ONLINE 38/2010 vom 16.9.2010

Der “freiwillige” Beratungsvertrag zwischen “GoMoPa” und estavis

Die wichtigste Finanzierungsquelle von “GoMoPa” war laut der Teilhaberinformation auch eine Bauträgergesellschaft, gegen die Anwalt Resch im Auftrag von Anlegern vorgegangen war. Deren Muttergesellschaft Estavis schloss einen “freiwilligen Beratervertrag” mit “GoMoPa” – das ist das Strickmuster der Resch-”GoMoPa”-Vorgehensweise…

Schon eigenartig. Da hat Gomopa eine eigene GmbH in Berlin – eine 100 % Tochter der Goldman, Morgenstern & Partners LLC – schliesst aber Verträge mit Erfüllungsort Deutschland mit dem Gerichtsstand New York. Die GmbH bestand bereits zum Zeitpunkt des Vertragsabschlusses.

GoMoPa GmbH, Berlin(Unter den Linden 21, 10117 Berlin). Firma: GoMoPa GmbH Sitz / Zweigniederlassung: Berlin Gegenstand: Die wirtschaftliche Beratung, insbesondere des Mittelstandes, in der europäischen Gemeinschaft unter der Wortmarke GoMoPa. Dazu gehören die Präsentation von Firmen im Internet und anderen Medien, Vermietung von Werbeflächen auch im Internet, die Vermittlung von Handels- und Wirtschaftskontakten und Werbung auch über das Internet sowie das Bereitstellen von Informationen und Portalen im Internet. Stamm- bzw. Grundkapital: 50.000,00 EUR Vertretungsregelung: Ist ein Geschäftsführer bestellt, so vertritt er die Gesellschaft allein. Sind mehrere Geschäftsführer bestellt, wird die Gesellschaft gemeinschaftlich durch zwei Geschäftsführer oder durch einen Geschäftsführer in Gemeinschaft mit einem Prokuristen vertreten. Alleinvertretungsbefugnis kann erteilt werden. Geschäftsführer:; 1. Reski, Peter, *23.12.1952, Verden/Aller; mit der Befugnis die Gesellschaft allein zu vertreten mit der Befugnis Rechtsgeschäfte mit sich selbst oder als Vertreter Dritter abzuschließen Rechtsform: Gesellschaft mit beschränkter Haftung.

========================================================

BERATUNGSVERTRAG

Zwischen der
ESTAVIS AG
Uhlandstrasse 165
D-10719 Berlln
– im folgenden ESTAVIS genannt –
Und

Goldman, Morgenstern & Partners LLC.
575 Madison Avenue, 10th floor
New York, NY 10022-2511
USA
– im folgenden GoMoPa genannt –

I. AUFTRAG UND DURCHFÜHRUNG

1.1 ESTAVIS beauftragt GoMoPa mit der Erarbeitung elnes neuartigen Vertrlebskonzeptes für den Abverkauf Denkmalgeschützter
Immoblilien an eine entsprechende Klientel, die unter zur Hilfenahme des lnternets und unter Einhaltung verbraucherrechtlicher Auflagen geworben werden soll.
1.2. Dazu gehören: Vorschläge zur Herstetlung von Internetseiten und entsprechender Werbung, Kostenberatung, Überwachung
und Einholung entsprechender Angebote, Personalsuche, Verhandlungen mit affilablen Anbietern, Vermittlung von Consutern.
1.3 Die Durchführung erfolgt in enger und ständiger Abstimmung mit einem Vertreter des Vorstands der ESTAVIS AG, sowie
rechtlichen und steuerlichen Beratern der ESTAVIS. GoMoPa wird diesbezüglich entsprechende Vorschläge erarbeiten, die detalllierte und
schriftliche und mündliche Empfehlungen auf Basis der von ESTAVIS angestrebten Zlele beinhalten.
1.4 Weitere Beratungsleistungen GoMoPa’s bezlehen slch nicht auf Rechts- oder Steuerberatung, haben aber Unterhändler
Gespräche sowie die Vermittlung entsprechender Consulter zum Inhalt, jedoch ohne rechtsverbindliche Vollmacht.

2. HONORAR
2.1 Für die Erbringung der genannten Leistunqen zahlt die ESTAVIS an GOMOPA ein Honorar In Höhe von 75.000.- € (Fünfundsiebzigtausend Euro). Das Honorar lst fällig wie folqt:
2.2. Bis zum 21.08.2009 eine Abschlagszahlung In Höhe von 50.000.- Euro. Anschliessend jeweils zum Ende eines Monats (beginnend mit dem August) 5 Teilbeträge in Höhe von jeweils 5.000,- Euro gezahlt. Zahlungen erfolgen gegen Rechnunqsstellung.
2.3. Leistungen, dle eventuell darüber hlnaus zu erbringen sind (eventuelte Reisekosten, Spesen, zusätzliche Aufgaben und
Arbeiten) werden separat und ausschliesslich nach Absprache in Rechnung gestellt und von ESTAVIS gezahlt.

3. SCHLUSSBESTIMMUNGEN

3.1 Sind oder werden einzelne Bestimmungen dieser Vereinbarung unwirksam, so bleibt die Gültigkeit der Vereinbarung im
Übriqen unberührt. Ungültige Bestimmungen sind einvernehmlich durch solche zu ersetzen, die unter Berücksichtigung der Interessenlage den gewünschten wirtschaftlichen Zweck zu erreichen geeignet sind. Entsprechendes gilt für die Ausfüllung von
Lücken, die sich In dieser Verelnbarung etwa herausstellen könnten.
3.2 Aenderungen und Ergänzungen dieser Vereinbarung bedürfen zu ihrer Rechtswirksamkeit der Schriftform. Das Gleiche gilt für
ehe Abbedingung dieser Schriftformklausel.
3.3 Erfülllungsort und ausschliesslicher Gerichtsstand ist New York.

Berlln den, New York den, 13.08.20O9

ESTAVIS AG Goldman Morgenstern & Partners llc
Mozanovski F. Lanz Klaus Maurischat



Fingierte “GoMoPa”-Meldungen über mich – ohne Sinn und Verstand

Liebe Leser,

nachdem ich zusammen mit anderen Opfern die “GoMoPa”-Affäre aufgedeckt habe, werden die STASI-Gangster mit fingierten Berichten versuchen weiterhin meine Glaubwürdigkeit anzugreifen.


Dabei geht den Verleumdern schon die Puste aus.

Fakt ist die Meldungen diesbzüglich sind ohne jede Basis, so dass Google uns bestätigt hat, diese seien rechtswidrig:

Sehr geehrter Herr Greenbaum,(mein Anwalt)

vielen Dank für Ihre Geduld. Wir haben Ihre Beschwerde gemäß den in dem Land Ihres
Wohnsitzes geltenden Gesetzen verarbeitet. Die folgenden Webseiten wurden aus Google
(www.google.de) entfernt:

http://www.gomopa.net/Pressemitteilungen.hxxxxx
http://www.gomopa.net/Pressemitteilungen.xxxx
http://pressreleaser.org/bernd-pulch-erpresser-xxxxx
http://www.gomopa.net/Finanzforum/dubios/stalker-uxxxx
https://scheisshausfliege.wordpress.com/2011/02/08/vxxxxx
http://www.gomopa.net/Pressemitteilungen.htmlxxxxx
https://scheisshausfliege.wordpress.com/2011xxxxxx

Bitte lassen Sie es uns wissen, falls Sie noch weitere Fragen haben.

Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Ihr Google-Team

Google Inc.
Legal Support
1600 Amphitheatre Parkway
Mountain View, CA 94043
USA

Opfer: “Darum ist Jochen Resch der erfundene “GoMoPa”-Goldman und Manfred Resch der erfundene “Morgenstern”

Hallo,

hier die bekannesten Fälle und Artikel bei denen GoMoPa OFFEN mit Resch zusammenarbeitete:

Das hat Resch aus der “GoMoPa”-Suchanfrage löschen lassen: Über 300 Treffer zu dem Suchbegriff “Resch beweisen, dass Jochen Resch “Goldman”  und Manfred Resch “Morgenstern sind – zudem kann “CEO” Maurischat kein Wort Englisch…

Resch Die Akte Schreibtisch5 Weiterer Beweis: Darum ist Jochen Resch GoMoPa Goldman und Manfred Resch Morgenstern

“Jochen Resch alias “Goldman” beim Schreiben”,…sagen die Opfer

manfred resch5 Weiterer Beweis: Darum ist Jochen Resch GoMoPa Goldman und Manfred Resch Morgenstern

“Manfred Resch alias “Morgenstern”, sagen die Opfer

 Weiterer Beweis: Darum ist Jochen Resch GoMoPa Goldman und Manfred Resch Morgenstern

“CEO” mit dem angeblichen Namen Klaus Maurischat bzw. Siegfried Siewert  kann kein Wort Englisch und ist Legastheniker

Hier die Mail des Opfer-Informanten “Deep Throat”:

Liebe Mit-Opfer

hier eine Aufstellung der Treffer mit dem Namen “Resch” in der Datenbank der ffingierten “Goldman, Morgenstern und Partner”.

Wir haben dies archiviert. Inzwischen wurden viele Links zur Verschleierung gelöscht:

.

Top of Form

25. März 2011
637 User online, 53.490 Mitglieder
Erweiterte Suche

Bottom of Form

Top of Form

Benutzer
Zugangsdaten vergessen
Passwort

Bottom of Form

» Warnliste

» Neueinträge / Heute: 10
» Neueinträge / Monat: 133

» Gesamt: 3288

Kategorien

GoMoPa®-Archive

» Themen des Tages
» Thema des Monats
» Ticker
» Aktuelles
» Newsletter – Archiv
» Pressemitteilungen

Registrierungen

Versenden
Bookmark
Fehler melden!

SuchergebnisseSuchergebnisse 1-100 von insgesamt 135 für »resch«.
Diese Suchbegriffe wurden hervorgehoben: resch
  • // <![CDATA[
    // < ![CDATA[
    // < ![CDATA[
    // < ![CDATA[
    //
    // <![CDATA[
    // < ![CDATA[
    // < ![CDATA[
    // < ![CDATA[
    // // // // <![CDATA[
    // < ![CDATA[
    // < ![CDATA[
    // < ![CDATA[
    // // <![CDATA[
    // < ![CDATA[
    // < ![CDATA[
    // < ![CDATA[
    //
  • 1
  • 2

Mittwoch, 16. Februar 2011, 17:45

Forenbeitrag von: »Anlegeranwalt«

DIG will weiterhin Geschäftsfeld auf erneuerbare Energien erweitern

…iken für den Anleger birgt. „Wir können unseren Mandanten und den Anlegern der DIG aufgrund der dürftigen Informationslage seitens der Geschäftsführung nur raten, der Änderung des Gesellschaftszwecks nicht zuzustimmen“ erklärt Rechtsanwalt Manfred Resch von der Anlegerschutzkanzlei Resch Rechtsanwälte. „Die Anleger werden über die neue Anlagestrategie völlig im Dunkeln gelassen“. Wichtig: Die jetzt durchgeführte Abstimmung findet im Umlaufverfahren statt und ist in jedem Fall beschlussfähig, egal…


Mittwoch, 16. Februar 2011, 17:43

Forenbeitrag von: »Anlegeranwalt«

DIG will Geschäftsfeld auf erneuerbare Energien erweitern

…ist ist aufgrund der vergangenen Feiertage und den fehlenden Informationen viel zu kurz bemessen. „Wir können den Anlegern der DIG Premium Select GbR und der DIG Premium Select GbR 2 letztendlich nicht zur Erweiterung des Geschäftsfeldes der DIG auf die „erneuerbaren Energien“ raten“, so Rechtsanwalt Manfred Resch…


Mittwoch, 9. Februar 2011, 19:57

Forenbeitrag von: »GoMoPa«

Mal ganz ehrlich …

… FIRMEN AUFLISTEN g”gerd198x” wehe Du vergisst eine – alter STASI -Schreiber about 1 hour ago via web # Jay 6:22 pm DEADLY CONVEYOR BELT AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA DU STASI NULL about 1 hour ago via web # Nach SJB-GoMoPa-Opfer.Infos ist der Mann hinter Resch: Ehrenfried Stelzer-Stasi-Agent und Leiter der Kriminalistik-Abt. Berliner Uni-Ost about 1 hour ago via web # Jochen Resch, Klaus Maurischat, Stasi-Oberst Stelzer und Dioxin-Mischer Sievert, was haben Sie gemeinsam ? about 1 hour ago via web # Tät…


Freitag, 28. Januar 2011, 13:15

Forenbeitrag von: »Berlin-Insider«

DKB Bank – Berliner Immobilienverkäufer-Szene nervös!

… gehört zu einem Haus in Berlin Spandau, in dem mehrere ähnliche Wohnungen an Ahnungslose verkauft worden sind. … mit Resch auch in diesen Fällen einigen wird, kann der Anwalt aber noch nicht bestätigen. Dass das nicht sofort und auch nicht öffentlich geschehe, sei angesichts der Gesamtsumme verständlich … So in dem Beitrag in der Zeit: http://www.zeit.de/wirtschaft/geldanlage/2011-0…hrottimmobilien Ich habe heute gehört das für interessante Unterlagen mittlerweile Beträge von bis zu 20.000 Euro …


Donnerstag, 20. Januar 2011, 06:55

Forenbeitrag von: »GM&P Info«

LICON Unternehmensgruppe – LICON Wohnbau GmbH – Leipzig

…tebank, kurz APO Bank genannt. Verwiesen wurde auf die Rolle der von der Licon beherrschten Medicon Immobilien GmbH, die von der Licon AG 15% Vermittlungsprovisionen erhalten und davon 6% – 8% an die Apo Bank weiter geleitet habe soll. Der Kanzlei Resch Rechtsanwälte liegen nunmehr Unterlagen vor, die belegen, dass die Beratungen von Apo Bank Kunden nicht etwa durch Anlageberater der Medicon Immobilien GmbH durchgeführt worden sind, sondern vielmehr die Beratung der Bestandskunden der Apo Bank du…


Samstag, 25. Dezember 2010, 10:27

Forenbeitrag von: »Korrespondent«

Resch Anwälte reichen Klage gegen Volkssolidarität ein

Lesen Sie bitte auch den Bericht über die Musterklage, die die Kanzlei Resch Anwälte aus Berlin gegen die Volkssolidarität am 9. Dezember 2010 eingereicht hat. Resch Anwälte reichen Klage gegen Volkssolidarität ein


Dienstag, 21. Dezember 2010, 09:05

Forenbeitrag von: »GM&P Info«

Debi Select Fonds

…einandersetzung mit dem Wortlaut der Gesellschaftsverträge als auch mit der einschlägigen Rechtsprechung vermissen. II. Zur Debi Select classic Fonds 2 GmbH & Co. KG Was den Fonds Debi Select classic Fonds 2 GmbH & Co. KG betrifft, bei dem Herr RA Resch die fehlende Eintragung der Anleger in das Handelsregister kritisiert und hieraus eine Haftung nach § 176 HGB herleiten möchte, ist festzuhalten, dass die Anleger nach dem vorgesehenen Fondskonzept zu keinem Zeitpunkt im Handelsregister eingetrag…


Dienstag, 21. Dezember 2010, 08:33

Forenbeitrag von: »GoMoPa«

Was andere Rechtsanwälte so von sich geben

Eine interessante Aufstellung zu weiteren Beiträgen und Hinweisen zu der hier beschriebenen Heli GmbH aus Leipzig finden Sie auch hier: Resch Rechtsanwälte Resch Rechtsanwälte II SGK Anwalt24 HEE Rechtsanwälte Sammelklage Online Schrottimmobilien Aktuell Immobilienbetrug Info


Sonntag, 10. Oktober 2010, 11:21

Forenbeitrag von: »GM&P Mod. Team«

Erneut Prozessniederlage in Leipzig

…reise in Leipzig ist der Weiterverkauf nach zehn Jahren mit Gewinn völlig illusorisch. Die Wohnungen sind „Schrottimmobilien“, die ihren Preis nicht wert sind. So die Definition, die sich unter Anlegerschützern seit geraumer Zeit eingebürgert hat. Resch Rechtsanwälte haben bereits mehrfach Zwangsvollstreckungen durch Gerichtsbeschluss gestoppt. Seit einiger Zeit gehen die Geschädigten zum Gegenangriff über. Eine Vielzahl von Klagen sind in der Vorbereitung oder auch schon beim Landgericht in Leip…


Donnerstag, 2. September 2010, 20:50

Forenbeitrag von: »GM&P Info«

Verbraucherschutz ist unwichtig – Schützt die Abzocker

Die Politik hat nicht begriffen, wie wichtig Verbraucherschutz ist – schreibt die ZEIT Zitat “Die Blamage geht weiter” – so überschrieb Finanztest Mitte Juli 2010 seine jüngste Untersuchung zur Qualität der Bankberatung in Deutschland. Der Staat fordert von den Bürgern private Vorsorge und hat trotz der Krise nicht begriffen, wie wichtig ein wirksamer Verbraucherschutz in der Finanzberatung ist. Noch immer werden Schrottimmobilien an ahnungslose Anleger verkauft, noch immer werden Kunden risikor…


Donnerstag, 2. September 2010, 14:46

Forenbeitrag von: »GoMoPa«

DKB mit Riesenproblemen! Angepumpt und abgezockt?

…dubiosen Strukturvertrieben. “Wir gehen davon aus, dass die DKB Kredite in Höhe von 1,5 bis drei Milliarden Euro im grauen Immobilienmarkt vergeben hat und zwar vorrangig an Klein- und Mittelverdiener”, sagt der Berliner Anlegerschutzanwalt Jochen Resch. Die Leute mussten keinerlei Eigenkapital bereitstellen, sondern wurden dazu verführt, eine Vollfinanzierung in Anspruch zu nehmen – ähnlich wie die Immobilienfinanzierungen in den USA, die erst die Kleinverdiener, dann Amerika und schließlich die…


Freitag, 6. August 2010, 17:34

Forenbeitrag von: »GM&P Info«

Immovaria GmbH – Steuern sparen – denkmalgeschützte Immobilien in Ostdeutschland

…after: Herr Ralph Distler EURO Convent AG, Nürnberg Zitat Die Euro Convent ist ein Bauträger und verkauft denkmalgeschützte Immobilien… Für den Vertrieb schaltet die EC Euro Convent externe Vertriebe ein, so unter anderen die Berliner Firma R&R First Concept und die sächsische DVO (Die Vermögens Optimierer). Beide Vertriebe nutzen die verbotene Akquisitionsmethode mit dem kalten Anruf per Telefon. “Tatwaffe Telefon” hat die Verbrauchszentrale Berlin dieses Werkzeug genannt. * Auszug: RA Resch


Freitag, 6. August 2010, 08:57

Forenbeitrag von: »extrabreit«

BGH: BADENIA Bausparkasse erneut rechtskräftig verurteilt

Was lange gährt wird endlch gut. Glückwunsch Herr Resch http://www.immofrust.de


Donnerstag, 5. August 2010, 16:11

Forenbeitrag von: »Anlegerschutz«

BGH: BADENIA Bausparkasse erneut rechtskräftig verurteilt

Die Deutsche Bausparkasse Badenia wurde in drei von Resch Rechtsanwälten vertretenen Fällen rechtskräftig zum Schadensersatz und Rückabwicklung verurteilt. Der Bundesgerichtshof wies die Nichtzulassungsbeschwerden der Badenia gegen die Berufungsurteile des Oberlandesgericht Karlsruhe mit Beschlüssen vom 13. Juli (Aktenzeichen XI ZR 71/09, XI ZR 72/09, 73/09) zurück. Die von der Kanzlei Resch Rechtsanwälte vertretenen Anleger erwarben Ende der neunziger Jahre zu Steuersparzwecken Immobilien in Wup…


Mittwoch, 4. August 2010, 15:46

Forenbeitrag von: »Anlegerschutz«

BGH bestätigit Bankenhaftung bei Innenprovision

…ichkeiten, um Schadenersatzansprüche gegen die finanzierende Bank zu begründen. Bei der Einsichtnahme in die internen Unterlagen der Firma SAFIN aus Berlin, einem Vertriebsunternehmen für Eigentumswohnungen verschiedener Verkäufer, hat die Kanzlei Resch Rechtsanwälte festgestellt, dass in den dort vorgefundenen mehr als 1.500 Fällen, Provisionen zwischen 10% und 20% des Kaufpreises vom Verkäufer an die SAFIN gezahlt worden sind, ohne dass der Erwerber hierüber aufgeklärt worden wäre. Die SAFIN wa…


Dienstag, 27. Juli 2010, 16:21

Forenbeitrag von: »Anlegerschutz«

Deutsche Bank – Rahmenvereinbarungen für Wertpapiergeschäfte

…lichen Regelung des BGB hat aber die Bank dem Kunden das Erlangte aus der Geschäftsbesorgung herauszugeben, somit auch die erhaltene Rückvergütung. Dieses Recht will die Deutsche Bank nunmehr ihren Kunden durch die „Rahmenvereinbarung für Wertpapiergeschäfte“ abschneiden. „Wir können daher nur ausdrücklich dazu raten, diese Vereinbarung nicht zu unterschreiben und zunächst anwaltlich überprüfen zu lassen“, so Rechtsanwalt Jochen Resch…


Donnerstag, 22. Juli 2010, 14:33

Forenbeitrag von: »Struckischreck«

Zauberei…

…ubar. Causa Ich glaube, dass Sie noch nicht einmal ein Durchschnittsvermittler sind und hoffe inständig für Sie, dass Sie dieses Produkt nicht vermitteln. Denn anderenfalls werden Sie in absehbarer Zeit Post z.B. von diesem Rechtsanwalt http://www.resch-rechtsanwaelte.de/C-307-Jochen-Resch.aspx erhalten, der Ihnen Schadensersatzklagen um die Ohren hauen wird, dass es nur so raucht. Als Vermittler sind Sie verpflichtet, die angebotenen Produkte auf Plausibilität zu prüfen und dabei auch kritische …


Donnerstag, 22. Juli 2010, 09:25

Forenbeitrag von: »GoMoPa«

Achtung – Schrottimmobilie – Leipzig, Creuzigerstr. 14

…1-870 65 97-0 Telefax: 0341-870 65 97-19 eMail: mail@heli-gmbh.de Amtsgericht Leipzig HRB 21563 Steuernr.: 231/110/09015 Geschäftsführerin: F. Rollberg Lesen Sie mehr über diese Unternehmung aus Leipzig: Vollstreckungsabwehrklagen gegen Heli, und in einem Beitrag der Rechtsanwälte Resch…


Donnerstag, 22. Juli 2010, 09:25

Forenbeitrag von: »GoMoPa«

Achtung – Schrottimmobilie – Leipzig, Melscherstrasse 1

…1-870 65 97-0 Telefax: 0341-870 65 97-19 eMail: mail@heli-gmbh.de Amtsgericht Leipzig HRB 21563 Steuernr.: 231/110/09015 Geschäftsführerin: F. Rollberg Lesen Sie mehr über diese Unternehmung aus Leipzig: Vollstreckungsabwehrklagen gegen Heli, und in einem Beitrag der Rechtsanwälte Resch…


Donnerstag, 22. Juli 2010, 09:25

Forenbeitrag von: »GoMoPa«

Achtung – Schrottimmobilie – Leipzig, Georg-Schwarz-Str. 200

…1-870 65 97-0 Telefax: 0341-870 65 97-19 eMail: mail@heli-gmbh.de Amtsgericht Leipzig HRB 21563 Steuernr.: 231/110/09015 Geschäftsführerin: F. Rollberg Lesen Sie mehr über diese Unternehmung aus Leipzig: Vollstreckungsabwehrklagen gegen Heli, und in einem Beitrag der Rechtsanwälte Resch…


Donnerstag, 22. Juli 2010, 09:25

Forenbeitrag von: »GoMoPa«

Achtung – Schrottimmobilie – Leipzig, Wittstockstr. 6

…1-870 65 97-0 Telefax: 0341-870 65 97-19 eMail: mail@heli-gmbh.de Amtsgericht Leipzig HRB 21563 Steuernr.: 231/110/09015 Geschäftsführerin: F. Rollberg Lesen Sie mehr über diese Unternehmung aus Leipzig: Vollstreckungsabwehrklagen gegen Heli, und in einem Beitrag der Rechtsanwälte Resch…


Donnerstag, 22. Juli 2010, 09:25

Forenbeitrag von: »GoMoPa«

Achtung – Schrottimmobilie – Glauchau, Auestrasse 51

…1-870 65 97-0 Telefax: 0341-870 65 97-19 eMail: mail@heli-gmbh.de Amtsgericht Leipzig HRB 21563 Steuernr.: 231/110/09015 Geschäftsführerin: F. Rollberg Lesen Sie mehr über diese Unternehmung aus Leipzig: Vollstreckungsabwehrklagen gegen Heli, und in einem Beitrag der Rechtsanwälte Resch…


Donnerstag, 22. Juli 2010, 09:25

Forenbeitrag von: »GoMoPa«

Achtung – Schrottimmobilie – Leipzig, Luetzner Str. 49

…1-870 65 97-0 Telefax: 0341-870 65 97-19 eMail: mail@heli-gmbh.de Amtsgericht Leipzig HRB 21563 Steuernr.: 231/110/09015 Geschäftsführerin: F. Rollberg Lesen Sie mehr über diese Unternehmung aus Leipzig: Vollstreckungsabwehrklagen gegen Heli, und in einem Beitrag der Rechtsanwälte Resch…


Donnerstag, 22. Juli 2010, 09:25

Forenbeitrag von: »GoMoPa«

Achtung – Schrottimmobilie – Leipzig, Elisabethstr. 22

…1-870 65 97-0 Telefax: 0341-870 65 97-19 eMail: mail@heli-gmbh.de Amtsgericht Leipzig HRB 21563 Steuernr.: 231/110/09015 Geschäftsführerin: F. Rollberg Lesen Sie mehr über diese Unternehmung aus Leipzig: Vollstreckungsabwehrklagen gegen Heli, und in einem Beitrag der Rechtsanwälte Resch…


Donnerstag, 22. Juli 2010, 09:25

Forenbeitrag von: »GoMoPa«

Achtung – Schrottimmobilie – Leipzig, Plaussiger Str. 31

…1-870 65 97-0 Telefax: 0341-870 65 97-19 eMail: mail@heli-gmbh.de Amtsgericht Leipzig HRB 21563 Steuernr.: 231/110/09015 Geschäftsführerin: F. Rollberg Lesen Sie mehr über diese Unternehmung aus Leipzig: Vollstreckungsabwehrklagen gegen Heli, und in einem Beitrag der Rechtsanwälte Resch…


Donnerstag, 22. Juli 2010, 09:25

Forenbeitrag von: »GoMoPa«

Achtung – Schrottimmobilie – Leipzig, Josephstr. 18

…1-870 65 97-0 Telefax: 0341-870 65 97-19 eMail: mail@heli-gmbh.de Amtsgericht Leipzig HRB 21563 Steuernr.: 231/110/09015 Geschäftsführerin: F. Rollberg Lesen Sie mehr über diese Unternehmung aus Leipzig: Vollstreckungsabwehrklagen gegen Heli, und in einem Beitrag der Rechtsanwälte Resch…


Donnerstag, 22. Juli 2010, 09:25

Forenbeitrag von: »GoMoPa«

Achtung – Schrottimmobilie – Leipzig, Dantestr. 6

…1-870 65 97-0 Telefax: 0341-870 65 97-19 eMail: mail@heli-gmbh.de Amtsgericht Leipzig HRB 21563 Steuernr.: 231/110/09015 Geschäftsführerin: F. Rollberg Lesen Sie mehr über diese Unternehmung aus Leipzig: Vollstreckungsabwehrklagen gegen Heli, und in einem Beitrag der Rechtsanwälte Resch…


Donnerstag, 22. Juli 2010, 09:25

Forenbeitrag von: »GoMoPa«

Achtung – Schrottimmobilie – Leipzig, Merseburger Str. 15

…1-870 65 97-0 Telefax: 0341-870 65 97-19 eMail: mail@heli-gmbh.de Amtsgericht Leipzig HRB 21563 Steuernr.: 231/110/09015 Geschäftsführerin: F. Rollberg Lesen Sie mehr über diese Unternehmung aus Leipzig: Vollstreckungsabwehrklagen gegen Heli, und in einem Beitrag der Rechtsanwälte Resch…


Donnerstag, 22. Juli 2010, 09:25

Forenbeitrag von: »GoMoPa«

Achtung – Schrottimmobilie – Leipzig, Grassdorfer Str. 10

…1-870 65 97-0 Telefax: 0341-870 65 97-19 eMail: mail@heli-gmbh.de Amtsgericht Leipzig HRB 21563 Steuernr.: 231/110/09015 Geschäftsführerin: F. Rollberg Lesen Sie mehr über diese Unternehmung aus Leipzig: Vollstreckungsabwehrklagen gegen Heli, und in einem Beitrag der Rechtsanwälte Resch…


Donnerstag, 22. Juli 2010, 09:25

Forenbeitrag von: »GoMoPa«

Achtung – Schrottimmobilie – Leipzig, Zweenfurther Str. 7

…1-870 65 97-0 Telefax: 0341-870 65 97-19 eMail: mail@heli-gmbh.de Amtsgericht Leipzig HRB 21563 Steuernr.: 231/110/09015 Geschäftsführerin: F. Rollberg Lesen Sie mehr über diese Unternehmung aus Leipzig: Vollstreckungsabwehrklagen gegen Heli, und in einem Beitrag der Rechtsanwälte Resch…


Donnerstag, 22. Juli 2010, 09:25

Forenbeitrag von: »GoMoPa«

Achtung – Schrottimmobilie – Leipzig, Alte Salzstrasse 17,19

…1-870 65 97-0 Telefax: 0341-870 65 97-19 eMail: mail@heli-gmbh.de Amtsgericht Leipzig HRB 21563 Steuernr.: 231/110/09015 Geschäftsführerin: F. Rollberg Lesen Sie mehr über diese Unternehmung aus Leipzig: Vollstreckungsabwehrklagen gegen Heli, und in einem Beitrag der Rechtsanwälte Resch…


Donnerstag, 22. Juli 2010, 09:25

Forenbeitrag von: »GoMoPa«

Achtung – Schrottimmobilie – Leipzig, Luetzner Str. 78

…1-870 65 97-0 Telefax: 0341-870 65 97-19 eMail: mail@heli-gmbh.de Amtsgericht Leipzig HRB 21563 Steuernr.: 231/110/09015 Geschäftsführerin: F. Rollberg Lesen Sie mehr über diese Unternehmung aus Leipzig: Vollstreckungsabwehrklagen gegen Heli, und in einem Beitrag der Rechtsanwälte Resch…


Donnerstag, 22. Juli 2010, 09:25

Forenbeitrag von: »GoMoPa«

Achtung – Schrottimmobilie – Leipzig, Franz-Fleming-Str. 78

…1-870 65 97-0 Telefax: 0341-870 65 97-19 eMail: mail@heli-gmbh.de Amtsgericht Leipzig HRB 21563 Steuernr.: 231/110/09015 Geschäftsführerin: F. Rollberg Lesen Sie mehr über diese Unternehmung aus Leipzig: Vollstreckungsabwehrklagen gegen Heli, und in einem Beitrag der Rechtsanwälte Resch…


Donnerstag, 22. Juli 2010, 09:25

Forenbeitrag von: »GoMoPa«

Achtung – Schrottimmobilie – Leipzig, Raimundstr. 2

…1-870 65 97-0 Telefax: 0341-870 65 97-19 eMail: mail@heli-gmbh.de Amtsgericht Leipzig HRB 21563 Steuernr.: 231/110/09015 Geschäftsführerin: F. Rollberg Lesen Sie mehr über diese Unternehmung aus Leipzig: Vollstreckungsabwehrklagen gegen Heli, und in einem Beitrag der Rechtsanwälte Resch…


Donnerstag, 22. Juli 2010, 09:25

Forenbeitrag von: »GoMoPa«

Achtung – Schrottimmobilie – Leipzig, Klasingstr. 44 b

…1-870 65 97-0 Telefax: 0341-870 65 97-19 eMail: mail@heli-gmbh.de Amtsgericht Leipzig HRB 21563 Steuernr.: 231/110/09015 Geschäftsführerin: F. Rollberg Lesen Sie mehr über diese Unternehmung aus Leipzig: Vollstreckungsabwehrklagen gegen Heli, und in einem Beitrag der Rechtsanwälte Resch…


Donnerstag, 22. Juli 2010, 09:25

Forenbeitrag von: »GoMoPa«

Achtung – Schrottimmobilie – Leipzig, Dimpfelstr. 31

…1-870 65 97-0 Telefax: 0341-870 65 97-19 eMail: mail@heli-gmbh.de Amtsgericht Leipzig HRB 21563 Steuernr.: 231/110/09015 Geschäftsführerin: F. Rollberg Lesen Sie mehr über diese Unternehmung aus Leipzig: Vollstreckungsabwehrklagen gegen Heli, und in einem Beitrag der Rechtsanwälte Resch…


Donnerstag, 22. Juli 2010, 09:25

Forenbeitrag von: »GoMoPa«

Achtung – Schrottimmobilie – Leipzig, Merseburger Str. 32

…1-870 65 97-0 Telefax: 0341-870 65 97-19 eMail: mail@heli-gmbh.de Amtsgericht Leipzig HRB 21563 Steuernr.: 231/110/09015 Geschäftsführerin: F. Rollberg Lesen Sie mehr über diese Unternehmung aus Leipzig: Vollstreckungsabwehrklagen gegen Heli, und in einem Beitrag der Rechtsanwälte Resch…


Donnerstag, 22. Juli 2010, 09:25

Forenbeitrag von: »GoMoPa«

Achtung – Schrottimmobilie – Leipzig, Grassdorfer Strasse 8

…1-870 65 97-0 Telefax: 0341-870 65 97-19 eMail: mail@heli-gmbh.de Amtsgericht Leipzig HRB 21563 Steuernr.: 231/110/09015 Geschäftsführerin: F. Rollberg Lesen Sie mehr über diese Unternehmung aus Leipzig: Vollstreckungsabwehrklagen gegen Heli, und in einem Beitrag der Rechtsanwälte Resch…


Donnerstag, 22. Juli 2010, 09:25

Forenbeitrag von: »GoMoPa«

Achtung – Schrottimmobilie – Rosswein, Gartenstrasse 30

…1-870 65 97-0 Telefax: 0341-870 65 97-19 eMail: mail@heli-gmbh.de Amtsgericht Leipzig HRB 21563 Steuernr.: 231/110/09015 Geschäftsführerin: F. Rollberg Lesen Sie mehr über diese Unternehmung aus Leipzig: Vollstreckungsabwehrklagen gegen Heli, und in einem Beitrag der Rechtsanwälte Resch…


Donnerstag, 22. Juli 2010, 09:25

Forenbeitrag von: »GoMoPa«

Achtung – Schrottimmobilie – Leipzig, Aurelienstrasse 35

…1-870 65 97-0 Telefax: 0341-870 65 97-19 eMail: mail@heli-gmbh.de Amtsgericht Leipzig HRB 21563 Steuernr.: 231/110/09015 Geschäftsführerin: F. Rollberg Lesen Sie mehr über diese Unternehmung aus Leipzig: Vollstreckungsabwehrklagen gegen Heli, und in einem Beitrag der Rechtsanwälte Resch…


Donnerstag, 22. Juli 2010, 09:25

Forenbeitrag von: »GoMoPa«

Achtung – Schrottimmobilie – Leipzig, Mariannenstr. 113

…1-870 65 97-0 Telefax: 0341-870 65 97-19 eMail: mail@heli-gmbh.de Amtsgericht Leipzig HRB 21563 Steuernr.: 231/110/09015 Geschäftsführerin: F. Rollberg Lesen Sie mehr über diese Unternehmung aus Leipzig: Vollstreckungsabwehrklagen gegen Heli, und in einem Beitrag der Rechtsanwälte Resch…


Donnerstag, 22. Juli 2010, 09:25

Forenbeitrag von: »GoMoPa«

Achtung – Schrottimmobilie – Leipzig, Geisselstr. 14

…1-870 65 97-0 Telefax: 0341-870 65 97-19 eMail: mail@heli-gmbh.de Amtsgericht Leipzig HRB 21563 Steuernr.: 231/110/09015 Geschäftsführerin: F. Rollberg Lesen Sie mehr über diese Unternehmung aus Leipzig: Vollstreckungsabwehrklagen gegen Heli, und in einem Beitrag der Rechtsanwälte Resch…


Donnerstag, 22. Juli 2010, 09:25

Forenbeitrag von: »GoMoPa«

Achtung – Schrottimmobilie – Leipzig, Rosa-Luxemburg Str. 56

…1-870 65 97-0 Telefax: 0341-870 65 97-19 eMail: mail@heli-gmbh.de Amtsgericht Leipzig HRB 21563 Steuernr.: 231/110/09015 Geschäftsführerin: F. Rollberg Lesen Sie mehr über diese Unternehmung aus Leipzig: Vollstreckungsabwehrklagen gegen Heli, und in einem Beitrag der Rechtsanwälte Resch…


Donnerstag, 22. Juli 2010, 09:25

Forenbeitrag von: »GoMoPa«

Achtung – Schrottimmobilie – Leipzig, Kohlgartenstr. 43

…1-870 65 97-0 Telefax: 0341-870 65 97-19 eMail: mail@heli-gmbh.de Amtsgericht Leipzig HRB 21563 Steuernr.: 231/110/09015 Geschäftsführerin: F. Rollberg Lesen Sie mehr über diese Unternehmung aus Leipzig: Vollstreckungsabwehrklagen gegen Heli, und in einem Beitrag der Rechtsanwälte Resch…


Donnerstag, 22. Juli 2010, 09:25

Forenbeitrag von: »GoMoPa«

Achtung – Schrottimmobilie – Leipzig, Dimpfelstr. 33

…1-870 65 97-0 Telefax: 0341-870 65 97-19 eMail: mail@heli-gmbh.de Amtsgericht Leipzig HRB 21563 Steuernr.: 231/110/09015 Geschäftsführerin: F. Rollberg Lesen Sie mehr über diese Unternehmung aus Leipzig: Vollstreckungsabwehrklagen gegen Heli, und in einem Beitrag der Rechtsanwälte Resch…


Donnerstag, 22. Juli 2010, 09:25

Forenbeitrag von: »GoMoPa«

Achtung – Schrottimmobilie – Leipzig, Mierendorffstr. 22

…1-870 65 97-0 Telefax: 0341-870 65 97-19 eMail: mail@heli-gmbh.de Amtsgericht Leipzig HRB 21563 Steuernr.: 231/110/09015 Geschäftsführerin: F. Rollberg Lesen Sie mehr über diese Unternehmung aus Leipzig: Vollstreckungsabwehrklagen gegen Heli, und in einem Beitrag der Rechtsanwälte Resch…


Donnerstag, 22. Juli 2010, 09:25

Forenbeitrag von: »GoMoPa«

Achtung – Schrottimmobilie – Leipzig, Guthsmuthsstr. 3

…1-870 65 97-0 Telefax: 0341-870 65 97-19 eMail: mail@heli-gmbh.de Amtsgericht Leipzig HRB 21563 Steuernr.: 231/110/09015 Geschäftsführerin: F. Rollberg Lesen Sie mehr über diese Unternehmung aus Leipzig: Vollstreckungsabwehrklagen gegen Heli, und in einem Beitrag der Rechtsanwälte Resch…


Donnerstag, 22. Juli 2010, 09:25

Forenbeitrag von: »GoMoPa«

Achtung – Schrottimmobilie – Leipzig, Baumannstr. 5

…1-870 65 97-0 Telefax: 0341-870 65 97-19 eMail: mail@heli-gmbh.de Amtsgericht Leipzig HRB 21563 Steuernr.: 231/110/09015 Geschäftsführerin: F. Rollberg Lesen Sie mehr über diese Unternehmung aus Leipzig: Vollstreckungsabwehrklagen gegen Heli, und in einem Beitrag der Rechtsanwälte Resch…


Donnerstag, 22. Juli 2010, 09:25

Forenbeitrag von: »GoMoPa«

Achtung – Schrottimmobilie – Leipzig, Mariannenstr. 119

…1-870 65 97-0 Telefax: 0341-870 65 97-19 eMail: mail@heli-gmbh.de Amtsgericht Leipzig HRB 21563 Steuernr.: 231/110/09015 Geschäftsführerin: F. Rollberg Lesen Sie mehr über diese Unternehmung aus Leipzig: Vollstreckungsabwehrklagen gegen Heli, und in einem Beitrag der Rechtsanwälte Resch…


Donnerstag, 22. Juli 2010, 09:25

Forenbeitrag von: »GoMoPa«

Achtung – Schrottimmobilie – Leipzig, Georg-Schumann-Str. 127

…1-870 65 97-0 Telefax: 0341-870 65 97-19 eMail: mail@heli-gmbh.de Amtsgericht Leipzig HRB 21563 Steuernr.: 231/110/09015 Geschäftsführerin: F. Rollberg Lesen Sie mehr über diese Unternehmung aus Leipzig: Vollstreckungsabwehrklagen gegen Heli, und in einem Beitrag der Rechtsanwälte Resch…


Donnerstag, 22. Juli 2010, 09:25

Forenbeitrag von: »GoMoPa«

Achtung – Schrottimmobilie – Leipzig, Schulze-Delitzsch-Str. 39

…1-870 65 97-0 Telefax: 0341-870 65 97-19 eMail: mail@heli-gmbh.de Amtsgericht Leipzig HRB 21563 Steuernr.: 231/110/09015 Geschäftsführerin: F. Rollberg Lesen Sie mehr über diese Unternehmung aus Leipzig: Vollstreckungsabwehrklagen gegen Heli, und in einem Beitrag der Rechtsanwälte Resch…


Donnerstag, 22. Juli 2010, 09:25

Forenbeitrag von: »GoMoPa«

Achtung – Schrottimmobilie – Aue, Rudolf-Breitscheid-Str. 49

…1-870 65 97-0 Telefax: 0341-870 65 97-19 eMail: mail@heli-gmbh.de Amtsgericht Leipzig HRB 21563 Steuernr.: 231/110/09015 Geschäftsführerin: F. Rollberg Lesen Sie mehr über diese Unternehmung aus Leipzig: Vollstreckungsabwehrklagen gegen Heli, und in einem Beitrag der Rechtsanwälte Resch…


Donnerstag, 22. Juli 2010, 09:25

Forenbeitrag von: »GoMoPa«

Achtung – Schrottimmobilie – Leipzig, Lange Reihe 23

…1-870 65 97-0 Telefax: 0341-870 65 97-19 eMail: mail@heli-gmbh.de Amtsgericht Leipzig HRB 21563 Steuernr.: 231/110/09015 Geschäftsführerin: F. Rollberg Lesen Sie mehr über diese Unternehmung aus Leipzig: Vollstreckungsabwehrklagen gegen Heli, und in einem Beitrag der Rechtsanwälte Resch…


Donnerstag, 22. Juli 2010, 09:25

Forenbeitrag von: »GoMoPa«

Achtung – Schrottimmobilie – Leipzig, Edlichstr. 20

…1-870 65 97-0 Telefax: 0341-870 65 97-19 eMail: mail@heli-gmbh.de Amtsgericht Leipzig HRB 21563 Steuernr.: 231/110/09015 Geschäftsführerin: F. Rollberg Lesen Sie mehr über diese Unternehmung aus Leipzig: Vollstreckungsabwehrklagen gegen Heli, und in einem Beitrag der Rechtsanwälte Resch…


Donnerstag, 22. Juli 2010, 09:25

Forenbeitrag von: »GoMoPa«

Achtung – Schrottimmobilie – Leipzig, Oelssnerstr. 4

…1-870 65 97-0 Telefax: 0341-870 65 97-19 eMail: mail@heli-gmbh.de Amtsgericht Leipzig HRB 21563 Steuernr.: 231/110/09015 Geschäftsführerin: F. Rollberg Lesen Sie mehr über diese Unternehmung aus Leipzig: Vollstreckungsabwehrklagen gegen Heli, und in einem Beitrag der Rechtsanwälte Resch…


Donnerstag, 22. Juli 2010, 09:25

Forenbeitrag von: »GoMoPa«

Achtung – Schrottimmobilie – Leipzig, Guthsmuthsstr. 5

…1-870 65 97-0 Telefax: 0341-870 65 97-19 eMail: mail@heli-gmbh.de Amtsgericht Leipzig HRB 21563 Steuernr.: 231/110/09015 Geschäftsführerin: F. Rollberg Lesen Sie mehr über diese Unternehmung aus Leipzig: Vollstreckungsabwehrklagen gegen Heli, und in einem Beitrag der Rechtsanwälte Resch…


Donnerstag, 22. Juli 2010, 09:25

Forenbeitrag von: »GoMoPa«

Achtung – Schrottimmobilie – Leipzig, Bennigsenstr. 18

…1-870 65 97-0 Telefax: 0341-870 65 97-19 eMail: mail@heli-gmbh.de Amtsgericht Leipzig HRB 21563 Steuernr.: 231/110/09015 Geschäftsführerin: F. Rollberg Lesen Sie mehr über diese Unternehmung aus Leipzig: Vollstreckungsabwehrklagen gegen Heli, und in einem Beitrag der Rechtsanwälte Resch…


Donnerstag, 22. Juli 2010, 09:25

Forenbeitrag von: »GoMoPa«

Achtung – Schrottimmobilie – Leipzig, Mariannenstr. 13

…1-870 65 97-0 Telefax: 0341-870 65 97-19 eMail: mail@heli-gmbh.de Amtsgericht Leipzig HRB 21563 Steuernr.: 231/110/09015 Geschäftsführerin: F. Rollberg Lesen Sie mehr über diese Unternehmung aus Leipzig: Vollstreckungsabwehrklagen gegen Heli, und in einem Beitrag der Rechtsanwälte Resch…


Donnerstag, 22. Juli 2010, 09:25

Forenbeitrag von: »GoMoPa«

Achtung – Schrottimmobilie – Leipzig, Georg-Schwarz-Str. 159

…1-870 65 97-0 Telefax: 0341-870 65 97-19 eMail: mail@heli-gmbh.de Amtsgericht Leipzig HRB 21563 Steuernr.: 231/110/09015 Geschäftsführerin: F. Rollberg Lesen Sie mehr über diese Unternehmung aus Leipzig: Vollstreckungsabwehrklagen gegen Heli, und in einem Beitrag der Rechtsanwälte Resch…


Donnerstag, 22. Juli 2010, 09:25

Forenbeitrag von: »GoMoPa«

Achtung – Schrottimmobilie – Leipzig, Spittastr. 1

…1-870 65 97-0 Telefax: 0341-870 65 97-19 eMail: mail@heli-gmbh.de Amtsgericht Leipzig HRB 21563 Steuernr.: 231/110/09015 Geschäftsführerin: F. Rollberg Lesen Sie mehr über diese Unternehmung aus Leipzig: Vollstreckungsabwehrklagen gegen Heli, und in einem Beitrag der Rechtsanwälte Resch…


Donnerstag, 22. Juli 2010, 09:25

Forenbeitrag von: »GoMoPa«

Achtung – Schrottimmobilie – Chemnitz, Sonnenstrasse 76

…1-870 65 97-0 Telefax: 0341-870 65 97-19 eMail: mail@heli-gmbh.de Amtsgericht Leipzig HRB 21563 Steuernr.: 231/110/09015 Geschäftsführerin: F. Rollberg Lesen Sie mehr über diese Unternehmung aus Leipzig: Vollstreckungsabwehrklagen gegen Heli, und in einem Beitrag der Rechtsanwälte Resch…


Donnerstag, 22. Juli 2010, 09:25

Forenbeitrag von: »GoMoPa«

Achtung – Schrottimmobilie – Leipzig, Lindenthaler Hauptstr. 70

…1-870 65 97-0 Telefax: 0341-870 65 97-19 eMail: mail@heli-gmbh.de Amtsgericht Leipzig HRB 21563 Steuernr.: 231/110/09015 Geschäftsführerin: F. Rollberg Lesen Sie mehr über diese Unternehmung aus Leipzig: Vollstreckungsabwehrklagen gegen Heli, und in einem Beitrag der Rechtsanwälte Resch…


Donnerstag, 22. Juli 2010, 09:25

Forenbeitrag von: »GoMoPa«

Achtung – Schrottimmobilie – Leipzig, Edlichstr. 25

…1-870 65 97-0 Telefax: 0341-870 65 97-19 eMail: mail@heli-gmbh.de Amtsgericht Leipzig HRB 21563 Steuernr.: 231/110/09015 Geschäftsführerin: F. Rollberg Lesen Sie mehr über diese Unternehmung aus Leipzig: Vollstreckungsabwehrklagen gegen Heli, und in einem Beitrag der Rechtsanwälte Resch…


Donnerstag, 22. Juli 2010, 09:25

Forenbeitrag von: »GoMoPa«

Achtung – Schrottimmobilie – Leipzig, Panitzstrasse 7

…1-870 65 97-0 Telefax: 0341-870 65 97-19 eMail: mail@heli-gmbh.de Amtsgericht Leipzig HRB 21563 Steuernr.: 231/110/09015 Geschäftsführerin: F. Rollberg Lesen Sie mehr über diese Unternehmung aus Leipzig: Vollstreckungsabwehrklagen gegen Heli, und in einem Beitrag der Rechtsanwälte Resch…


Donnerstag, 22. Juli 2010, 09:25

Forenbeitrag von: »GoMoPa«

Achtung – Schrottimmobilie – Leipzig, Guthsmuthsstr. 7

…1-870 65 97-0 Telefax: 0341-870 65 97-19 eMail: mail@heli-gmbh.de Amtsgericht Leipzig HRB 21563 Steuernr.: 231/110/09015 Geschäftsführerin: F. Rollberg Lesen Sie mehr über diese Unternehmung aus Leipzig: Vollstreckungsabwehrklagen gegen Heli, und in einem Beitrag der Rechtsanwälte Resch…


Donnerstag, 22. Juli 2010, 09:25

Forenbeitrag von: »GoMoPa«

Achtung – Schrottimmobilie – Leipzig, Bernhardstr. 44

…1-870 65 97-0 Telefax: 0341-870 65 97-19 eMail: mail@heli-gmbh.de Amtsgericht Leipzig HRB 21563 Steuernr.: 231/110/09015 Geschäftsführerin: F. Rollberg Lesen Sie mehr über diese Unternehmung aus Leipzig: Vollstreckungsabwehrklagen gegen Heli, und in einem Beitrag der Rechtsanwälte Resch…


Donnerstag, 22. Juli 2010, 09:25

Forenbeitrag von: »GoMoPa«

Achtung – Schrottimmobilie – Leipzig, Mariannenstr. 66

…1-870 65 97-0 Telefax: 0341-870 65 97-19 eMail: mail@heli-gmbh.de Amtsgericht Leipzig HRB 21563 Steuernr.: 231/110/09015 Geschäftsführerin: F. Rollberg Lesen Sie mehr über diese Unternehmung aus Leipzig: Vollstreckungsabwehrklagen gegen Heli, und in einem Beitrag der Rechtsanwälte Resch…


Donnerstag, 22. Juli 2010, 09:25

Forenbeitrag von: »GoMoPa«

Achtung – Schrottimmobilie – Leipzig, Georg-Schwarz-Str. 167

…1-870 65 97-0 Telefax: 0341-870 65 97-19 eMail: mail@heli-gmbh.de Amtsgericht Leipzig HRB 21563 Steuernr.: 231/110/09015 Geschäftsführerin: F. Rollberg Lesen Sie mehr über diese Unternehmung aus Leipzig: Vollstreckungsabwehrklagen gegen Heli, und in einem Beitrag der Rechtsanwälte Resch…


Donnerstag, 22. Juli 2010, 09:25

Forenbeitrag von: »GoMoPa«

Achtung – Schrottimmobilie – Leipzig, Ungerstr. 16

…1-870 65 97-0 Telefax: 0341-870 65 97-19 eMail: mail@heli-gmbh.de Amtsgericht Leipzig HRB 21563 Steuernr.: 231/110/09015 Geschäftsführerin: F. Rollberg Lesen Sie mehr über diese Unternehmung aus Leipzig: Vollstreckungsabwehrklagen gegen Heli, und in einem Beitrag der Rechtsanwälte Resch…


Donnerstag, 22. Juli 2010, 09:25

Forenbeitrag von: »GoMoPa«

Achtung – Schrottimmobilie – Frankonia Wert AG

…1-870 65 97-0 Telefax: 0341-870 65 97-19 eMail: mail@heli-gmbh.de Amtsgericht Leipzig HRB 21563 Steuernr.: 231/110/09015 Geschäftsführerin: F. Rollberg Lesen Sie mehr über diese Unternehmung aus Leipzig: Vollstreckungsabwehrklagen gegen Heli, und in einem Beitrag der Rechtsanwälte Resch…


Donnerstag, 22. Juli 2010, 09:25

Forenbeitrag von: »GoMoPa«

Achtung – Schrottimmobilie – Leipzig, Ludwigstr. 86

…1-870 65 97-0 Telefax: 0341-870 65 97-19 eMail: mail@heli-gmbh.de Amtsgericht Leipzig HRB 21563 Steuernr.: 231/110/09015 Geschäftsführerin: F. Rollberg Lesen Sie mehr über diese Unternehmung aus Leipzig: Vollstreckungsabwehrklagen gegen Heli, und in einem Beitrag der Rechtsanwälte Resch…


Donnerstag, 22. Juli 2010, 09:25

Forenbeitrag von: »GoMoPa«

Achtung – Schrottimmobilie – Leipzig, Edlichstr. 30

…1-870 65 97-0 Telefax: 0341-870 65 97-19 eMail: mail@heli-gmbh.de Amtsgericht Leipzig HRB 21563 Steuernr.: 231/110/09015 Geschäftsführerin: F. Rollberg Lesen Sie mehr über diese Unternehmung aus Leipzig: Vollstreckungsabwehrklagen gegen Heli, und in einem Beitrag der Rechtsanwälte Resch…


Donnerstag, 22. Juli 2010, 09:25

Forenbeitrag von: »GoMoPa«

Achtung – Schrottimmobilie – Leipzig, Pater-Gordian-Str. 80

…1-870 65 97-0 Telefax: 0341-870 65 97-19 eMail: mail@heli-gmbh.de Amtsgericht Leipzig HRB 21563 Steuernr.: 231/110/09015 Geschäftsführerin: F. Rollberg Lesen Sie mehr über diese Unternehmung aus Leipzig: Vollstreckungsabwehrklagen gegen Heli, und in einem Beitrag der Rechtsanwälte Resch…


Donnerstag, 22. Juli 2010, 09:25

Forenbeitrag von: »GoMoPa«

Achtung – Schrottimmobilie – Leipzig, Hermann-Liebmann-Str. 103

…1-870 65 97-0 Telefax: 0341-870 65 97-19 eMail: mail@heli-gmbh.de Amtsgericht Leipzig HRB 21563 Steuernr.: 231/110/09015 Geschäftsführerin: F. Rollberg Lesen Sie mehr über diese Unternehmung aus Leipzig: Vollstreckungsabwehrklagen gegen Heli, und in einem Beitrag der Rechtsanwälte Resch…


Montag, 19. Juli 2010, 14:11

Forenbeitrag von: »Anlegerschutz«

Heli GmbH Leipzig droht mit Zwangsvollstreckung

…ben werden bzw. weitere Zwangsvollstreckungsmaßnahmen verhindert werden. „In allen Fällen haben wir für unsere Mandanten Vollstreckungsabwehrklagen eingereicht. Die Zwangvollstreckung wurde vorläufig eingestellt“, erklärt dazu Anlegeranwalt Jochen Resch von der Berliner Kanzlei Resch Rechtsanwälte. Das waren bisher acht Fälle vor den Landgerichten in Halle, Berlin, Braunschweig , Dresden, Mühlhausen, Rostock und Görlitz. In der Folge trat die Heli dann vom Kaufvertrag zurück. Die Entscheidungen d…


Mittwoch, 7. Juli 2010, 15:17

Forenbeitrag von: »Anlegerschutz«

BGH: Bahnbrechendes Urteil für Erwerbermodelle

…ist noch angenommen werden, stehe diese Auffassung in klarem Widerspruch zu den Regelungen des § 146 BGB. Die Annahme des Angebotes ist also danach nicht mehr möglich. „Bei den rund zwei tausend Fällen, die wir in der Kategorie „Schrottimmobilien“ jährlich annehmen, werden wir eine Vielzahl derartiger Konstellationen finden“, erklärt dazu Anlegeranwalt Jochen Resch…


Dienstag, 6. Juli 2010, 14:19

Forenbeitrag von: »Anlegerschutz«

Omikron Immobilien GmbH insolvent

…urde meist versprochen, dass sich der Erwerb der Wohnung durch die steuerlichen Vergünstigungen und den Mieteinnahmen fast von alleine rechne. Nach 10 Jahren werde man die Wohnung mit Gewinn verkaufen. Die Wohnungen wurden regelmäßig über die DKB finanziert. Vermittler war Thomas Friese, lange Zeit „Partner der DKB“. In dieser Konstellation haben Resch…


Dienstag, 6. Juli 2010, 10:24

Forenbeitrag von: »GM&P Info«

UVBD GmbH – Unabhängige Verbraucherberatung Deutschland – DID Deutscher Informationsdienst – Direkt Invest Deutschland

…itat Die Marketingmethoden erinnern an die des mittlerweile verstorbenen Reno Clemann. Anleger sollen sich an dubiosen Anlagen beteiligen Ganz vorne Jaqueline Lemke, die Witwe von Reno Clemann, der sich nach der Heirat auch Reno Lemke nannte. * RA Resch Group “UVBDgeschaedigte” Zitat Der Geschäftsführer der UVBD (Hannover) ist ebenfalls Geschaftsführer der Prime Estate GmbH in Berlin und der WKVI in Düsseldorf. Diese Veröffentlichung bedeutet nicht, daß gegen den / die Genannten irgendwelche Vorw…


Samstag, 29. Mai 2010, 05:37

Forenbeitrag von: »Ronald-Stanczus«

Neue Pfandpflicht ebnet Dose den Rückweg

…der Getränke und eine längere Haltbarkeit. Für Penny selbst brächten Dosen den Vorteil, leichter stapelbar, stabiler und kompakter zu sein. Daneben hätten die Hersteller viele Kritikpunkte an Getränkedosen aus den 90er Jahren korrigiert. Vor 2003 wurden in Deutschland acht Milliarden Dosen pro Jahr verkauft. (Ag) “Kundenwunsch” oder ?: Zitat “Der Handel sitzt auf Pfandgeldern in Milliardenhöhe, die nicht eingelöst wurden”, sagt Jürgen Resch…


Mittwoch, 5. Mai 2010, 13:55

Forenbeitrag von: »Ronald-Stanczus«

Flaschenpfand: Profifälscher wollen Kasse machen

…er Kampagne wollen die Deutsche Umwelthilfe (DHU) sowie Vertreter des Getränkehandels erneut auf die Vorteile von Mehrweg-Flaschen hinweisen. Diese schonten Ressourcen, vermieden Müll und schonten die Umwelt, sagte DUH-Bundesgeschäftsführer Jürgen Resch am Mittwoch in Berlin. Zugleich warf er den Herstellern von Einweg-Plastikflaschen vor, ihre Verpackungen mit Studien schön zu rechnen. Diese Ökobilanzen hielten einer kritischen Überprüfung jedoch nicht stand. Beispielweise tauchten in der jüngst…


Donnerstag, 29. April 2010, 06:33

Forenbeitrag von: »Ronald-Stanczus«

Deutschland soll zum Leitmarkt für Elektromobilität werden

Vor einer Verschwendung von Steuergeldern zur Förderung von Elektroautos hat die Deutsche Umwelthilfe gewarnt. Der Bundesgeschäftsführer der Organisation, Jürgen Resch, sagte der “Berliner Zeitung”, wegen der Batterietechnik seien Elektrofahrzeuge zu teuer und hätten außerdem eine zu geringe Reichweite. “Das Elektroauto wird auf absehbare Zeit kein Massenprodukt”. Die Bundesregierung solle daher bei dem für kommenden Montag geplanten Gipfeltreffen mit Industrie und Wissenschaft keine weiteren För…


Dienstag, 9. März 2010, 09:58

Forenbeitrag von: »GoMoPa«

DKB finanzierte dubiose Immobiliengeschäfte

…pelt so hoch. Das war der R+R First Concept Vertriebs „ohne jede Frage bekannt“, heißt es im Urteil. DKB in der Pflicht Wegen der mehr als doppelt so hohen monatlichen Raten gerieten die Anleger in finanzielle Schwierigkeiten. Sie bevollmächtigten Resch Rechtsanwälte in Berlin und verklagten die DKB auf Schadenersatz. Das Landgericht Berlin gab ihnen Recht. Da die DKB allein im Dardanellenweg und in der Rixdofer Straße für 14 Anleger Wohnungen finanzierte, habe sie mit der R+R First Concept insti…


Sonntag, 14. Februar 2010, 19:47

Forenbeitrag von: »GM&P Info«

DKB Bank – R&R First Concept – und der Immobilienverkauf

… der Eigentumswohnung verlangen. Die DKB hat bis zum Frühjahr 2009 über Vertriebe verkaufte Eigentumswohnungen in Milliardenhöhe finanziert. „Wir haben fast tausend DKB Finanzierungen für unsere Mandanten recherchiert“, erklärt Rechtsanwalt Jochen Resch, „Regelmäßig ist davon auszugehen, dass die Wohnungen im Falle des Weiterverkaufes nicht einmal die Hälfte der aufgenommenen Darlehenssumme erbringen. Eine gigantische Immobilienblase.“ Die DKB hat für den Vertrieb ihre Kredite teilweise dieselben…


Montag, 4. Januar 2010, 11:50

Forenbeitrag von: »Jinai«

TK immobilien Berlin

…ge mir sagt , das er finanziell am ende sei , kann er doch seien Akten packen und mal eben in ein anderes Büro umziehen … hat er das alleine gemacht oder kostet ihm das kein Geld? Unsere Wohnung , für die wir 185000 € bezahlt haben , ist laut RA Resch gerade mal zwischen 60000 – 70000 € wert … wenn überhaupt !! Gekauft im Mai 08 , seitdem leerstand … versprochene Renovierung , Sanierung , bis heute nichts zu sehen .die Wohnung konnten wir auf Druck hin auch erst im August 09 besichtigen. Mi…


Dienstag, 29. Dezember 2009, 13:39

Forenbeitrag von: »Wayne-Schlegel«

BSZ Bund für soziales und ziviles Rechtsbewußtsein e.V. und BGKS Gröpper und Köpke Rechtsanwälte

Damit hat sich Gomopa bereits einmal in einer Ausarbeitung beschäftigt. Man nennt solche Vereine Mandantenschaufeln!


Montag, 26. Oktober 2009, 14:21

Forenbeitrag von: »GoMoPa«

BAG, Hamm

…r sich Raiffeisen- und Volksbanken im Bereich von Fondsfinanzierungen oder sonstigen Immobiliengeschäften des grauen Kapitalmarktes verhoben haben, springt die BAG ein. So haben wir eine Vielzahl von Verfahren, die ihren Anfang bei einer regionalen Raiffeisen oder Volksbank nahmen, als sie die Anleger diverser Immobilienfonds finanzierten. Als mancher dieser Fonds dann später in die Schieflage geriet, ist die BAG eingesprungen und hat die Erwerberdarlehen übernommen. Quelle Resch…


Freitag, 23. Oktober 2009, 10:34

Forenbeitrag von: »Fischbeck«

Empfohlen von Heinz Gerlach? Lieber nicht!

…er & Diekötter, Garmischer Str. 4/I, 80339 München http://www.rae-rainer-diekoetter.de * Renner, Oliver, Rechtsanwalt, Kanzlei M. Wüterich, Dr. Chr. Wüterich, D. M. Breucker, Charlottenstr. 22-24, 70182 Stuttgart http://www.wueterich-breucker.de * Resch, Jochen, Rechtsanwalt, Resch Rechtsanwälte Kurfürstendamm 45, 10719 Berlin http://www.resch-rechtsanwaelte.de * Roehlke, Christian-H., Rechtsanwalt, Kastanienallee 1, 10435 Berlin http://www.anlegerschutzkanzlei.de * Rössler, Peter, Rechtsanwalt, …


Samstag, 10. Oktober 2009, 11:00

Forenbeitrag von: »GoMoPa«

OLG München: VR Bank München Land verliert in einem Rentadomo Fall

…t in den Rentadomo Komplex, in dem wir zahlreiche Anleger betreuen. Bereits in dem erstinstanzlichen Urteil des Landgerichts München war durch das Landgericht festgestellt worden, dass die Raiffeisenbank Feldkirchen und die Initiatoren institutionell zusammen gewirkt hatten. Dies führt zu einer Beweislastumkehr. Die Raiffeisenbank war nicht in der Lage, den ihr vorgeworfenen Wissensvorsprung zu widerlegen. Das Urteil wurde von der Berliner Anlegerschutzkanzlei Resch…


Samstag, 10. Oktober 2009, 10:58

Forenbeitrag von: »GoMoPa«

Landgericht Verden verurteilt Sparkasse Menden

… gezogen. Trotz der laufenden Ermittlungsverfahren und offenkundig fragwürdigen Umstände bei der Kreditvergabe setzt die Sparkasse Menden ihre Zwangsvollstreckungsmaßnahmen gegen die Geschädigten fort. Nur mit gerichtlicher Hilfe konnte die Berliner Anlegerschutzkanzlei Resch…


Montag, 13. Juli 2009, 21:19

Forenbeitrag von: »GM&P Info«

Rückschlag im Kampf gegen den grauen Kapitalmarkt? DIAS wird aufgelöst

…uchsgruber tritt die Nachfolge des im April zurück getretenen Geschäftsführers Volker Pietsch an. Kritiker werfen dem DIAS vor, dass dessen Hauptsponsor den Verein missbraucht, um Mandanten zu rekrutieren. Dies hat der Berliner Rechtsanwalt Jochen Resch aber ausdrücklich von sich gewiesen. Das DIAS soll unter Fuchsgruver finanziell auf breitere Füße gestellt werden, auch andere Kanzleien würden Geld zuschießen. “Künftig soll auch der Unterhaltungsfaktor beim DIAS gesteigert werden”, kündigte Fuch…


Freitag, 19. Juni 2009, 15:54

Forenbeitrag von: »GM&P Info«

Rückschlag im Kampf gegen den grauen Kapitalmarkt? DIAS wird aufgelöst

Anlegerinstitut kämpfte gegen dubiose Produkte Das Deutsche Institut für Anlegerschutz (DIAS) soll aufgelöst werden. Der langjährige Geldgeber des Vereins, der Berliner Rechtsanwalt Jochen Resch, sagte der Süddeutschen Zeitung, die Mitgliederversammlung werde am 26. Juni wohl die Liquidierung des DIAS beschließen. Damit droht ein Rückschlag im Kampf gegen den grauen Kapitalmarkt, an dem Hunderttausende Deutsche Milliarden Euro verloren haben. Mit der Auflösung ginge ein guter Name verloren. Etlic…


Samstag, 7. März 2009, 08:40

Forenbeitrag von: »GM&P Info«

Immobilienhai Herbert Köllner ist pleite

…wird der Insolvenzverwalter seinen Bericht über die Vermögenssituation der Köllner & Co. KG abgeben. Unter anderem wird darüber entschieden, ob Dr. Thiel als Insolvenzverwalter bestätigt wird und ob ein Gläubigerausschuss eingerichtet werden soll. Resch Rechtsanwälte werden für ihre Mandanten die notwendigen Anmeldungen vornehmen. Ebenso wird Rechtsanwalt Jochen Resch persönlich an der Gläubigerversammlung in Bielefeld teilnehmen. Die Köllner & Co. KG hatte unter ihrem Chef Herbert Köllner in den…


Montag, 23. Februar 2009, 12:13

Forenbeitrag von: »extrabreit«

Schrottimmobilien – Anleger können klagen

…Ich erlaube mir daher mal die Liste zu ergänzen durch Anwälte die NACHWEISLICH Gerichtsverfahren in sogenannten Schrottimmobilienverfahren nicht nur geführt sondern auch gewonnen haben. http://www.kapitalanlagerecht.net/ Witt, Nittel 69115 Heidelberg http://www.resch-rechtsanwaelte.de/Jochen Resch 10719 Berlin http://www.nord-com.net/e.ahr/index.html Eberhard Ahr 28195 Bremen Binder,Tilp,Hänssler,Lachmair sind in der obrigen Aufstellung auch bekannt…von den anderen habe ich noch nix positives im Bereich Schrottimmo…


Freitag, 30. Januar 2009, 19:10

Forenbeitrag von: »Goldfisch5«

Werter (Mit)-User extrabreit, mit der Empfehlung des Herrn RA Resch aus Berlin wäre ich etwas zurückhaltender, da er – wie Ihnen sicher bekannt sein dürfte – auch eher zu den umstrittenen Vertretern der Zunft der sog. Anlegerschützer gehört. In zahlreichen Beiträgen, auch in den Printmedien, wurde das Thema RA Resch häufig behandelt. Kritiker unterstellen ihm selbst, durch gezielte Verunsicherung von Anlegern und überzogene Versprechungen Mandate an sich zu ziehen, ganz böse Zungen reden gar von …


Freitag, 23. Januar 2009, 11:24

Forenbeitrag von: »extrabreit«

Immobilienhai Herbert Köllner ist pleite

Sorry, bofh aber der Beitrag ist nun wirklich vollkommen daneben. Zu Umschreiben mit : Sicheres Auftreten bei völliger Ahnungslosigkeit. Ich Empfehle mal ein Gespräch mit Herrn RA Resch aus Berlin über das Thema zu führen oder sich im Forum Immofrust mal die Methoden anzuschauen wie diese kriminellen Vertriebe auch heute noch vorgehen. Es hat auch Richter,Staatsanwälte,Rechtsanwälte, Schauspieler und vor allem den kleinen Mann getroffen,dem man mit dem Thema Altersvorsorge in die Immofalle gelock…


Donnerstag, 8. Januar 2009, 09:33

Forenbeitrag von: »GM&P Info«

Entscheidungen gegen die Gallinat Bank bei ImmoFonds

…Gallinat Bank zuließ. Diese Voraussetzungen seien erst durch die anwaltliche Beratung gegeben. Immer wieder stellten wir fest, dass Gerichte die offenkundigen Voraussetzungen eines des institutionalisierten Zusammenwirkens verkennen. Das Landgericht Passau hat die Vorgaben des Bundesgerichtshofes folgerichtig umgesetzt, meint dazu Rechtsanwalt Jochen Resch…


Montag, 25. August 2008, 06:47

Forenbeitrag von: »Ronald-Stanczus«

Flaschenpfand: Profifälscher wollen Kasse machen

…braucher zahlen an der Kasse das teure Einwegpfand, bekommen aber bei der Rückgabe nur den billigen Mehrweg-Betrag ausgezahlt. „Discounter und Großbrauereien führen Verbraucher mit Einwegflaschen im Mehrweglook bewusst in die Irre“, wettert Jürgen Resch. Für den Bundesgeschäftsführer der Deutschen Umwelthilfe (DUH) ist klar: Am Pfandautomaten wird abgezockt. Durch die Ähnlichkeit einzelner Einweg- und Mehrwegflaschen würden Kunden, die 25 Cent Pfand auf eine Einwegbierflasche gezahlt haben, unter…


Freitag, 1. August 2008, 07:54

Forenbeitrag von: »GM&P Info«

Vorsicht bei Anruf von Tel. 03222-8839861

…her bei: Phönix Domo Vertriebs GmbH Wohnungs & Grundbesitzmarketing, Berlin (umfirmiert aus Benny’s Fahrschule GmbH, Berlin [!?]) (Insolvenz 2004, F. H. stieg 2002 bereits aus) Heli GmbH Luppenstrasse 20 04177 Leipzig 0341 / 47849888 Rechtsanwälte Resch haben dazu folgendes veröffentlicht http://www.resch-rechtsanwaelte.de/C-662-Heli-GmbH,-Leipzig.aspx Zitat Biete Job als Telefonist/Telefonistin, Callagent Ort: D-10789 Berlin Firmenname: Wirtschaftskanzlei Hennig & Kollegen GmbH Vorgesehenes Arbe…


Mittwoch, 30. Juli 2008, 15:00

Forenbeitrag von: »CLLB Rechtsanwälte«

EECH AG – Erste Gläubigerversammlung am 29.07.08 in Hamburg

…AG statt. Von den über 7300 Gläubigern waren ca. 150 persönlich anwesend. Von der Kanzlei CLLB wurden im Rahmen der Gläubigerversammlung Forderungen in Höhe von € 4,8 Mio. von der Kanzlei BGKS Forderungen in Höhe von € 2,4 Mio. und von der Kanzlei Resch-Rechtsanwälte Forderungen in Höhe von € 0,5 Mio. anwaltlich vertreten. Die Gesamtforderungen aller Gläubiger der EECH belaufen sich vorläufig auf einen Betrag in Höhe von ca. € 67,00 Mio. Es wurden insgesamt 7012 Forderungen zur Tabelle angemeldet…


Donnerstag, 24. Juli 2008, 08:31

Forenbeitrag von: »Ronald-Stanczus«

Feinstaub…

…n Stadtväter und Landespolitiker durchsetzen können, die sich ihrer vornehmsten Pflicht, die Bürgerinnen und Bürger vor schweren Gesundheitsgefahren zu schützen, immer noch beharrlich zu entziehen versuchen”, sagte DUH Bundesgeschäftsführer Jürgen Resch. Sollte der EuGH ein bürgerfreundliches Urteil fällen, rechnet Resch mit harten und umgehenden Fahrverboten in allen von zu hohen Feinstaubbelastungen betroffenen Ballungsgebieten. “In Städten mit Umweltzonen, die die Grenzwerte für Feinstaub trot…


  • // <![CDATA[
    // < ![CDATA[
    // < ![CDATA[
    // < ![CDATA[
    //
  • 1
  • 2

» Inkasso: Mahnschüsse ins Blaue 30.10.2009

» The Wall AG feuert Vertrieb 02.07.2010

» Massenbetrug durch EuMedien Callcenter? 26.04.2010

» Wie anonym ist eine Liechtensteinische Stiftung? 21.08.2007

» Die Geldhexen von Berlin 14.05.2009

» Archiv: Pressemeldungen

// <![CDATA[
// < ![CDATA[
// < ![CDATA[
// < ![CDATA[
// “+String.fromCharCode(60)+”/script>”);
// ]]>
// ]]>
// ]]>// // <![CDATA[
// < ![CDATA[
// < ![CDATA[
// < ![CDATA[
// // <![CDATA[
// < ![CDATA[
// < ![CDATA[
// < ![CDATA[
// // // // // // // // // // // //

// <![CDATA[
// < ![CDATA[
// < ![CDATA[
// < ![CDATA[
// // <![CDATA[
// < ![CDATA[
// < ![CDATA[
// < ![CDATA[
// // <![CDATA[
// < ![CDATA[
// < ![CDATA[
// < ![CDATA[
// // <![CDATA[
// < ![CDATA[
// < ![CDATA[
// < ![CDATA[
// // <![CDATA[
// < ![CDATA[
// < ![CDATA[
// < ![CDATA[
// // <![CDATA[
// < ![CDATA[
// < ![CDATA[
// < ![CDATA[
// // <![CDATA[
// < ![CDATA[
// < ![CDATA[
// < ![CDATA[
// // <![CDATA[
// < ![CDATA[
// < ![CDATA[
// < ![CDATA[
// // <![CDATA[
// < ![CDATA[
// < ![CDATA[
// < ![CDATA[
// // <![CDATA[
// < ![CDATA[
// < ![CDATA[
// < ![CDATA[
// // <![CDATA[
// < ![CDATA[
// < ![CDATA[
// < ![CDATA[
//

 Weiterer Beweis: Darum ist Jochen Resch GoMoPa Goldman und Manfred Resch Morgenstern

// <![CDATA[
// < ![CDATA[
// < ![CDATA[
// < ![CDATA[
// // <![CDATA[
// < ![CDATA[
// < ![CDATA[
// < ![CDATA[
// // <![CDATA[
// < ![CDATA[
// < ![CDATA[
// < ![CDATA[
// // <![CDATA[
// < ![CDATA[
// < ![CDATA[
// < ![CDATA[
// // <![CDATA[
// < ![CDATA[
// < ![CDATA[
// < ![CDATA[
// // <![CDATA[
// < ![CDATA[
// < ![CDATA[
// < ![CDATA[
// // <![CDATA[
// < ![CDATA[
// < ![CDATA[
// < ![CDATA[
// // <![CDATA[
// < ![CDATA[
// < ![CDATA[
// < ![CDATA[
// // <![CDATA[
// < ![CDATA[
// < ![CDATA[
// < ![CDATA[
// // <![CDATA[
// < ![CDATA[
// < ![CDATA[
// < ![CDATA[
// // <![CDATA[
// < ![CDATA[
// < ![CDATA[
// < ![CDATA[
//

Copyright 2000-2011 – Goldman Morgenstern & Partners Consulting LLC

in Kooperation mit

BeschwerdeImpressumPolizei-StA-BehördenWerbungPresseAccount UpgradeToolsPartnerprogrammHilfeAGB | // <![CDATA[
// < ![CDATA[
// < ![CDATA[
// < ![CDATA[
// < ![CDATA[
if(typeof(_gat)!='object')document.write('’)
// ]]>
// ]]>
// ]]>// // <![CDATA[
// < ![CDATA[
// < ![CDATA[
// < ![CDATA[
//

Sie sind noch kein Mitglied auf GoMoPa? Jetzt registrieren!

.

Top of Form

25. März 2011
642 User online, 53.490 Mitglieder
Erweiterte Suche

Bottom of Form

Top of Form

Benutzer
Zugangsdaten vergessen
Passwort

Bottom of Form

» Warnliste

» Neueinträge / Heute: 10
» Neueinträge / Monat: 133

» Gesamt: 3288

Kategorien

GoMoPa®-Archive

» Themen des Tages
» Thema des Monats
» Ticker
» Aktuelles
» Newsletter – Archiv
» Pressemitteilungen

Registrierungen

Versenden
Bookmark
Fehler melden!

SuchergebnisseSuchergebnisse 101-135 von insgesamt 135 für »resch«.
Diese Suchbegriffe wurden hervorgehoben: resch
  • // <![CDATA[
    // < ![CDATA[
    // < ![CDATA[
    // < ![CDATA[
    //
    // <![CDATA[
    // < ![CDATA[
    // < ![CDATA[
    // < ![CDATA[
    // // // // <![CDATA[
    // < ![CDATA[
    // < ![CDATA[
    // < ![CDATA[
    // // <![CDATA[
    // < ![CDATA[
    // < ![CDATA[
    // < ![CDATA[
    //
  • 1
  • 2

Dienstag, 18. März 2008, 09:42

Forenbeitrag von: »GM&P Info«

Wohnungsbaugesellschaft Leipzig-West AG – wer hat Infos?

… über 28.000 geschädigten Anlegern stellt allein die logistische Bearbeitung und Abwicklung eine enorme Herausforderung dar.„Das gesamte Verfahren dürfte deshalb nach derzeitigem Kenntnisstand an die zehn Jahre dauern,“ schätzt Rechtsanwalt Jochen Resch, der die Anleger im Gläubigerausschuss vertritt. Die Wohnungsbaugesellschaft Leipzig West hatte im Sommer 2006 Insolvenz angemeldet. Über 28.000 Anleger warten seither auf die Rückzahlung der von ihnen eingezahlten Gelder. Dabei handelt es sich um…


Dienstag, 18. März 2008, 09:39

Forenbeitrag von: »GM&P Info«

Anlegerschutz: Anlageberatung-Südwestrenta (LG Stuttgart)

Zitat Pressemitteilung von: Resch Rechtsanwälte Die Südwest Finanz Vermittlungs Dritte AG aus Markdorf hat vor dem Amtsgericht Reinbek (5.C.228/07) verloren. Die Südwest hatte die Anlegerin auf Zahlung der monatlichen Raten für das Anlagemodell „Südwestrentaplus“ verklagt. Nach Meinung des Gerichts verstieß der Anlageberater gegen seine Aufklärungspflichten, als er mit dem Slogan „Steuern runter, Rente rauf“ eine sichere Anlage zur Altersvorsorge angeboten hatte. Das Gericht erklärte, dass der A…


Freitag, 18. Januar 2008, 17:32

Forenbeitrag von: »hdschulz«

Die Wiederkehr des Verdrängten

… von hochqualifizierten Deutschen stimmt bereits mit den Füßen ab. 2005 sind fast 150 000 ausgewandert, mehr als jemals seit den 50er Jahren – ein Verlust, der durch den Zuzug meist mittelloser Migranten ohne Ausbildung inzwischen nicht einmal mehr kompensiert wird. Und da behauptet die SPD in ihrem neuen Programm, Deutschland sei zu einem Einwanderungsland geworden. Ja, zu was für einem. (Siehe auch: Stefan Luft, Abschied von Multikulti —Wege aus der Integrationskrise, Resch…


Dienstag, 15. Januar 2008, 09:10

Forenbeitrag von: »GM&P Info«

Wer kennt Futura Finanz / Frankonia Sachwert / CAS ?

… zur Kündigung seiner Lebensversicherung überredet worden sei, um sein Geld bei der Deltoton zu investieren. Während der Zeugenvernehmung stellte sich heraus, dass sogar einer der Anlageberater selbst den Sinn des Aufbauprogramms nicht erklären konnte, also eine entsprechende Beratung hierzu gar nicht durchführen konnte. Angesichts seiner jahrelangen Erfahrung sei nicht nachvollziehbar, dass der Zeuge den Sinn des Aufbauprogramms vergessen haben sollte. Pressemitteilung von: Resch…


Samstag, 5. Januar 2008, 09:52

Forenbeitrag von: »Ronald-Stanczus«

Asset Investment Ltd – unlautere Angebote

…eist sind die Anteilseigner persönlich haftende Gesellschafter, die auch gegenüber der darlehensgebenden Bank uneingeschränkt haftbar sind. “Das Erfolgskonzept dieser Fonds fußte auf der Steuerersparnis durch die Fördergelder”, sagte Anwalt Jochen Resch. “Die ist weggefallen, nun müssen Renditen erwirtschaftet werden.” Da jedoch viel zu teuer gebaut worden sei, müssten heute die Mieten rund das Dreifache betragen, um überhaupt einen Ertrag zu erwirtschaften. “Dem ist aber nicht so”, sagte Resch w…


Montag, 3. Dezember 2007, 11:40

Forenbeitrag von: »Struckischreck«

Re: VISKUS GMBH Berlin

…fügen dann rufen Sie uns noch heute an. dann würde ich sagen, hier wird wieder einmal fehlende Qualifikation durch ausreichenden Umsatz ersetzt. Hauptsache Umsatz, alles andere ist egal. Das führt dann zwangsläufig zu solchen Sachverhalten: http://resch-rechtsanwaelte.com/C_560_VISKUS,_Berlin.aspx Zitat In den uns vorliegenden Fällen ist die Firma Viskus aus Berlin als Vertrieb für steuerbegünstigte bzw. denkmalgeschützte Immobilien aufgetreten und hat auf die übliche unseriöse Weise Kunden akqui…


Dienstag, 16. Oktober 2007, 09:57

Forenbeitrag von: »Ronald-Stanczus«

Rußpartikelfilter

…lassung selbst zurückgegeben hat. “Die Beantragung der Allgemeinen Betriebserlaubnis” sei “mit einem Formfehler behaftet” gewesen. Bei der Deutschen Umwelthilfe (DUH) hält man das allerdings für einen Verschleierungsversuch. Geschäftsführer Jürgen Resch erklärte, die Filter hätten nur eine “mangelhafte Wirkung”. Und: Die aktuell verkauften Modelle stimmten nicht mehr mit denen überein, die für die Zulassung geprüft worden waren. Für die Zulassung beim Kraftfahrtbundesamt reicht das Gutachten eine…


Freitag, 28. September 2007, 05:06

Forenbeitrag von: »GM&P Info«

VermögensGarant AG und 9,25% p.a.???

Zitat Pressemitteilung von: Resch Rechtsanwälte Das Landgericht Berlin hat den ehemaligen Vorstand der VermögensGarant und ein ehemaliges Mitglied des Aufsichtsrates zum Schadensersatz verurteilt. Zuvor war bereits gegen ein weiteres Mitglied des Aufsichtsrates ein Versäumnisurteil ergangen. In seiner Entscheidung hat das Landgericht zahlreiche Fehler im Verkaufsprospekt der VermögensGarant zu den Inhaberteilschuldverschreibungen VG IV und V festgestellt. Insbesondere wird die unzureichende Dars…


Sonntag, 23. September 2007, 09:39

Forenbeitrag von: »momonza«

Stellungnahme der EECH

…en Male in nennenswertem Umfang mit unserem Unternehmen beschäftigt. Die Veröffentlichungen stehen immer in direktem Zusammenhang mit Verlautbarungen und direktem Verweis auf die selbsternannten Anlegerschützer CLLB Rechtsanwälte und Rechtsanwälte Resch beziehungsweise ihre als Anlegerschützer getarnten Akquisevereine BSZ e.V. und DIAS e.V. Die Artikel des Redakteurs Thomas Öchsner der Süddeutschen Zeitung bieten selten wirkliche Neuigkeiten. Anstatt dessen wird bereits Geschriebenes noch einmal …

Annex March Fredric Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde 042 1024x847 Weiterer Beweis: Darum ist Jochen Resch GoMoPa Goldman und Manfred Resch Morgenstern


Mr. Jochen “GoMoPa” Hyde, wie er leibt und lebt

Montag, 17. September 2007, 04:37

Forenbeitrag von: »GM&P Info«

Ulrich Engler – Daytrader wehrt sich gegen Internet-Gerüchte

Zitat Pressemitteilung von: Resch Rechtsanwälte Der mittlerweile mit internationalem Haftbefehl gesuchte Ulrich Engler wollte das Geld seiner Anleger innerhalb von vier Jahren verdoppeln. In amerikanische Immobilien sollte es gesteckt werden. Engler war mit seiner Firma Private Commercial Office Inc. in Florida ansässig. Des Weiteren bot er ein sog. Daytrading an, bei dem bis zu 72% Zinsen im Jahr verdient werden könnten. Bei Daytrading bzw. Intraday -Trading handelt es sich um Geschäfte, die in…


Samstag, 1. September 2007, 07:39

Forenbeitrag von: »GM&P Mod. Team«

8,15 % Zins – EECH AG, Hamburg

… gerichtlich untersagen, in Zusammenhang mit der „Süddeutsche Zeitung“ zu behaupten, es gebe ein wirtschaftlich verflochtenes Netzwerk zwischen dem Redakteur Thomas Öchsner, der „Süddeutsche Zeitung“ und den Anwaltskanzleien CLLB und Rechtsanwälte Resch. Auch die Feststellung, dass es weitere finanzielle Verflechtungen und Zusammenhänge gebe, die aktuell ermittelt werden, wollte die Tageszeitung unterbinden. Das Landgericht München kam dem Antrag der „Süddeutsche Zeitung“ nicht nach, sondern folg…


Donnerstag, 30. August 2007, 07:06

Forenbeitrag von: »GM&P Info«

Anlegerschutz: Anlageberatung-Südwestrenta (LG Stuttgart)

…ie Südwest Finanz Vermittlung Aktiengesellschaften einen weiteren wichtigen Beschluss erzielt: Die 13. Zivilkammer des Landgerichts Nürnberg-Fürth hat am 16.08.2007 im Wege der einstweiligen Verfügung entschieden, dass es den Rechtsanwälten Jochen Resch & Kollegen, Kurfürstendamm 45, 10719 Berlin, verboten ist, in Bezug auf die Südwest Finanz Vermittlung Aktiengesellschaften eine Reihe von unwahren Tatsachenbehauptungen zu verbreiten. In einem der Südwestrenta konkret vorliegenden Fall, haben die…


Dienstag, 14. August 2007, 22:32

Forenbeitrag von: »Ronald-Stanczus«

Dieselstinker werden ausgesperrt

…rboten. Die vor allem in diesem Frühjahr losgetretene Debatte über Ausnahmen für praktisch alle Altfahrzeuge habe offensichtlich dazu geführt, dass viele irrtümlich glauben, um Fahrverbote herumkommen zu können, erklärte DUH-Geschäftsführer Jürgen Resch. Vom derzeitigen Altbestand an ca. neun Millionen ungefilterten Diesel-Pkw haben nach einer Recherche der DUH von Januar bis Juli 2007 nur knapp drei Prozent (ca. 250 000 Pkw) ihr Fahrzeug mit einem Diesel-Partikelfilter nachgerüstet. Als Grund fü…


Dienstag, 24. Juli 2007, 20:06

Forenbeitrag von: »GM&P Info«

OLG Karlsruhe: Badenia erneut verurteilt

…ntwerden des sogenannten Bafin-Berichtes der Gutachter von Deloitte&Touche im Jahr 2004 gegeben sei. Zudem interpretiert die 10. Kammer des Landgerichtes Karlsruhe eine Entscheidung des OLG Karlsruhe dahingehend, dass aufgrund der Kompliziertheit dieser BADENIA Fälle die Frist noch nicht einmal zu laufen begonnen habe. Demnach könnte also der Weg zu den Gerichten im BADENIA Komplex bis zum Ablauf der absoluten Verjährungsfrist im Jahr 2012 offen bleiben. Pressemitteilung von: Resch…


Mittwoch, 27. Juni 2007, 07:26

Forenbeitrag von: »Spiritus Rector«

ImmoConcept – Ostimmobilien, die Masche funktioniert noch!

…Wert weit darunter, bei gut 30.000 Euro. Die alte Masche erlebt eine Rennaissance Dubiose Immobiliengeschäfte zum Steuernsparen sind eigentlich ein alter Hut. Schon vor Jahren sind viele Anleger darauf hereingefallen. Doch Verbraucheranwalt Jochen Resch warnt: „Man steigt seit einiger Zeit wieder neu ins Geschäft ein. Der Markt erlebt einen enormen Aufschwung in den letzten Monaten“. 18 Jahre nach Mauerfall bleibt Leipzig Hauptziel der Immobilienabzocker mit Pseudo-Steuersparmodellen. Jede zehnte…


Dienstag, 12. Juni 2007, 13:16

Forenbeitrag von: »GM&P Info«

Göttinger Gruppe (Securenta AG)

…n Gebäude mit großem gepflegten Park und altem Baumbestand. Es ist wohl eines der schönsten und feudalsten privaten Anwesen in Berlin. Dieser Umzug erfolgte fast unbemerkt von der Öffentlichkeit. So kam es denn, dass ahnungslose Anlegeranwälte immer noch –bekanntlich vergebens- in Göttingen an die Tür klopften. Auch das Insolvenzgericht in Göttingen nahm den Insolvenzantrag eines geschädigten Anlegers an und setzte sogar einen vorläufigen Insolvenzverwalter ein. Auszug: Pressemeldung – RA Resch


Donnerstag, 15. März 2007, 09:54

Forenbeitrag von: »GM&P Info«

PROKON-Genussschein

…otes der Einlagenrückgewähr qualifiziert werden, müssten die Kommanditisten im Insolvenzfall der Fondsgesellschaft die Ausschüttungen nach § 172 Abs. 4 HGB zurück zahlen. Trotz Kenntnis der schwierigen Marktsituation versucht die Unternehmensgruppe mit einem neuen Fonds, dem New Energy Fonds VII, weitere € 21 Millionen bei Kommanditisten einzuwerben und Genusscheine im Gesamtbetrag von € 200 Millionen mit einer Verzinsung von 9% an Anleger zu verkaufen. Pressemitteilung von: Resch…


Mittwoch, 14. Februar 2007, 15:44

Forenbeitrag von: »Ronald-Stanczus«

Bundesregierung: klimaschädliche Dienstwagenflotte

…n Spritfresser erklärtermaßen gegen eine Limousine mit sparsamem Hybridantrieb eintauschen will. Deshalb fordern wir die Bundesregierung auf, ihr von der Automobilindustrie gesponsertes Schaufahren gegen den Klimaschutz geschlossen zu beenden“, so Resch. „Die Automobilhersteller nutzen unsere Spitzenpolitiker jeden Abend in der Tagesschau als kostenlose Werbeträger für ihre schweren Limousinen. Sie können sicher sein, dass die Investition sich rechnet. Denn dem schlechten Beispiel folgen jährlich…


Donnerstag, 31. August 2006, 12:26

Forenbeitrag von: »GM&P Mod. Team«

Wohnungsbaugesellschaft Leipzig-West AG – wer hat Infos?

Zitat WBG Leipzig West – Wo ist das Geld geblieben? Eine heiße Spur führt in die Schweiz Pressemitteilung von: Resch Rechtsanwälte Die WBG steht nach Erkenntnissen der Anlegerschutzkanzlei Resch Rechtsanwälte, Berlin, kurz vor der Eröffnung des Insolvenzverfahrens. Demnach soll im November eine Gläubigerversammlung durchgeführt werden. Auf der Gläubigerversammlung wird der bis dahin wohl auch amtlich bestellte Insolvenzverwalter, Rechtsanwalt Dr. Lucas F. Flöther, Leipzig, sein Gutachten über di…


Montag, 14. August 2006, 17:24

Forenbeitrag von: »Ronald-Stanczus«

Steuerliche Förderung von Dieselpartikelfiltern gestrichen

…hweiz und die Niederlande – als Neufahrzeuge nicht mehr zulassen wollen, funktionieren hierzulande die Abteilungen für ´Regierungsbeziehungen´ der deutschen Automobilhersteller trotz aller Skandale reibungslos”, so DUH-Bundesgeschäftsführer Jürgen Resch. “Sollte es bei dieser Lösung bleiben, hätten sich Dieter Zetsche und Bernd Pischetsrieder, die Vorstandschef der Branchenführer DaimlerChrysler und VW, und ihr Sprachrohr, VDA-Präsident Bernd Gottschalk, mit ihrer Forderung durchgesetzt, weiterhi…


Sonntag, 13. August 2006, 17:24

Forenbeitrag von: »Ronald-Stanczus«

Rechtliche Schritte gegen die Firma BellandVision

…d (so das Nachrichtenmagazin “Der SPIEGEL” in der aktuellen Ausgabe vom 14.8.2006) seit 1984 durch Belland vertrieben wird. “Das sogenannte Belland-Materialsystem ist ein primitives Einwegsystem mit gravierenden ökologischen Nachteilen”, so Jürgen Resch, Bundesgeschäftsführer der Deutschen Umwelthilfe e.V. (DUH). Seit der erstmaligen Präsentation dieses Kunststoffs vor 22 Jahren findet ein Recycling – von früheren Laborversuchen abgesehen – nicht statt. Dem Verbraucher suggeriert BellandVision hi…


Mittwoch, 28. Juni 2006, 04:57

Forenbeitrag von: »Ronald-Stanczus«

DM Beteiligungen AG

…rn ein Schaden bis zu 500 Mio. Euro. Beide Unternehmen hatten Anleger mit hohen Zinsversprechen gelockt. “Die Anleger sollten sich zusammenschließen, um Einfluss auf das Insolvenzverfahren ausüben zu können”, sagte der Berliner Rechtsanwalt Jochen Resch, stellvertretender Vorstand des Deutschen Instituts für Anlegerschutz. Das Verfahren wird eröffnet, wenn Insolvenzverwalter Piepenburg bei DM Beteiligungen ein Immobilien- und Beteiligungsvermögen festgestellt hat. Damit ist zu rechnen: DM Beteili…


Freitag, 16. Juni 2006, 13:39

Forenbeitrag von: »Ronald-Stanczus«

Ermittlungen gegen Leipzig-West AG

…irma tief in der Krise steckt. Nur ein Schneeballsystem habe die hohe Rendite am Anfang gewährleistet: Immer neue Anleger brachten neues frisches Geld ins System. Doch jetzt fließen Zinsen und Rückzahlungen nicht mehr wie vereinbart. Anwalt Jürgen Resch vertritt Dutzende der Anleger. Mehrfach hat er nachgefragt, wann seine Mandanten ihr Geld bekommen – zuletzt immer vergeblich: “Ich mach mir Sorgen, dass man keine Auskünfte geben möchte, weil die finanzielle Situation sehr ernst ist. Es gibt seit…


Sonntag, 30. April 2006, 14:18

Forenbeitrag von: »Ronald-Stanczus«

Neue Pfandpflicht ebnet Dose den Rückweg

… anders. Der Handel nutze das ungeliebte Pfand als Vorwand, die wegen der Mehrwertsteuererhöhung ohnehin vorgesehene Preiserhöhung durchzusetzen. “Dann ist es natürlich gut, wenn man behaupten kann, dass an allem das böse Dosenpfand schuld ist”, sagt Carel Mohn vom vzbv. Dabei müssten die Kassen der Händler gefüllt sein. “Der Handel sitzt auf Pfandgeldern in Milliardenhöhe, die nicht eingleöst wurden”, sagt Jürgen Resch…


Mittwoch, 12. April 2006, 18:49

Forenbeitrag von: »Ronald-Stanczus«

Rußpartikelfilter

…tz gegenteiliger Festlegungen im Koalitionsvertrag abgelehnt. Auch das von Wolfgang Tiefensee (SPD) geführte Verkehrsministerium betreibe eine »konsequente Blockadepoltik«, beklagte der Bundesgeschäftsführer der Deutschen Umwelthilfe (DUH), Jürgen Resch, am Mittwoch auf einer Pressekonferenz der »Allianz Kein Diesel ohne Filter«. Neben der DUH haben sich auch die Umweltorganisationen Greenpeace, BUND, NABU und Deutscher Naturschutzring, sowie der Verkehrsklub VCD und der Kinderschutzbund dem Bünd…


Dienstag, 29. November 2005, 09:17

Forenbeitrag von: »A. Henneberg«

Schrottimmobilien – Anleger können klagen

…chäfte weiter betreiben dürften. An die deutschen Gerichte appellierte Renner, den Geschädigten von Kreditinstituten und Vertrieben endlich den Glauben in einen zum Schutze der Bürger funktionierenden Rechtsstaat wiederzugeben. Rechtsanwalt Jochen Resch (Berlin) informierte über den Stand der juristischen Auseinandersetzungen mit den Firmen Köllner und Allwo bzw, der BADENIA Bausparkasse. Die Tendenz der Rechtssprechung deute darauf hin, dass sich das Blatt zu Gunsten der sich von diesen Unterneh…


Freitag, 19. August 2005, 08:43

Forenbeitrag von: »Schinderhanne«

VermögensGarant AG und 9,25% p.a.???

Es gab in diesem Thread seitens der VG AG Verteidiger mehrmals Vorwürfe gegen die Dias und damit auch gegen einen Ihrer Repräsentanten: Rechtsanwalt Jochen Resch aus Berlin. Schaun wir doch einmal für einen Augenblick auf den Ankläger und überprüfen wir seine Intentionen! Mit wem haben wir es zu tun: Mit einem Rechtsanwalt auf Kundenfang oder mit einem engagierten Verbraucherschützer? Herr Spilker wird es mir hoffentlich verzeihen, es muß zitiert werden, was im www. verstreut und so zusammenhangl…


Mittwoch, 17. August 2005, 23:21

Forenbeitrag von: »underground fighter«

Quelle

Es scheint so, dass einige (sehr) an den Quellen interessiert sind. Liebe Leser, ergänzend zu @Schinderhanne finden Sie die Mitteilung aus Zitat 5 unter: http://resch-und-kollegen.de/news.php?newsid=31#read Wie schon bereits angekündigt muss ich hierbei nochmals wiederholen, dass der Vorstand bzw. Herr Thorsten Christian Barth in kürze eine Stellungnahme zu allen diffamierenden Berichten geben wird. … sehen Sie also immer wieder auf die Homepage der Vermoegensgarant AG : http://www.vermoegens&#8230;


Montag, 8. August 2005, 15:01

Forenbeitrag von: »A. Henneberg«

VermögensGarant AG und 9,25% p.a.???

… behalten, mit dem Geld arbeiten und soviel Zinsen verdienen, daß sich der Kredit von selber abzahlen würde. Abgewickelt werden sollte der Deal angeblich über die Amro-Bank. Zu schön um wahr zu sein: Das Ehepaar wartet noch immer auf die drei Millionen, schildert Rechtsanwalt Jochen Resch…


Donnerstag, 4. August 2005, 13:57

Forenbeitrag von: »unbelievable«

Ein Schelm, der …….

…inkten Seite kommt dann folgende Empfehlung: Zitat Unabhängig hiervon empfehlen wir jenen Vermögensgarant-Opfern, die dringend einen Anwalt suchen, möglichst umgehend mit der auf Kapitalanlagerecht spezialisierten renommierten Rechtsanwaltskanzlei Resch & Kollegen Kontakt aufzunehmen: Resch & Kollegen Kurfürstendamm 45 10719 Berlin Tel.: 030/88 59 77 0 http://www.resch-und-kollegen.de Die Anwaltskanzlei vertritt bereits eine Vielzahl von Vermögensgarant-OPFERN! und zufällig ist Herr RA Resch im Vorstand…


Dienstag, 2. August 2005, 15:03

Forenbeitrag von: »Goodman«

Reno Lemke alias Clemann Anlagenbetrüger in Dubai

… am 20.09.2003 wurden von uns vor dem Landgericht Berlin erfolgreich angefochten. Ebenso erfolgreich war die Schadensersatzklage gegen Reno Clemann persönlich. Die C & C CyberCooperation AG hat im Sommer 2004 Insolvenz angemeldet. Das Insolvenzverfahren ist eröffnet und wird durchgeführt von der Anwaltskanzlei Leonhard und Partner in Berlin. Reno Clemann (Lemcke) hält sich zur Zeit in Dubai auf. Es laufen in Berlin eine Reihe von Ermittlungsverfahren gegen ihn. Quelle: http://www.rechtsanwalt-resch&#8230;


Montag, 1. August 2005, 00:24

Forenbeitrag von: »M. Joppe«

wer kennt reno clemann nennt sich jetzt lemcke

…nn/kennt-jemand-german-emirates-consulting-gmbh.htm http://www.google.de/search?hl=de&q=reno+clemann+&meta= http://www.pro-anleger.de/warnliste/Cyber_Corporation/cyber_corporation.html http://216.239.59.104/search?q=cache:2Qv2OUgrhLsJ:rechtsanwalt-resch.de/faelle.php+reno+clemann+&hl=de Zitat C & C CyberCooperation AG (Clemann) Wir vertreten über 100 Aktionäre in den Verfahren gegen den Vorstand Reno Clemann, der sich jetzt Reno Lemcke nennt. Reno Clemann hat sich in den 90er Jahren eine Firmengr…


Samstag, 23. Juli 2005, 07:38

Forenbeitrag von: »A. Henneberg«

VermögensGarant AG und 9,25% p.a.???

… soviel Zinsen verdienen, daß sich der Kredit von selber abzahlen würde. Abgewickelt werden sollte der Deal angeblich über die Amro-Bank. Zu schön um wahr zu sein: Das Ehepaar wartet noch immer auf die drei Millionen, schildert Rechtsanwalt Jochen Resch, der sich auf Verbraucherschutz spezialisiert hat und Opfer der VermögensGarant betreut: “Die 200 000 Euro dagegen sind wohl futsch.” “Sogenannte Standby-Letter of credits, prime-bank guarantees oder Bankbürgschaften haben Konjunktur auf dem Graue…


Dienstag, 18. Januar 2005, 18:55

Forenbeitrag von: »monxx77«

Reno Lemke alias Clemann Anlagenbetrüger in Dubai

…eno+clemann%22&hl=de http://www.aerger-forum.de/dcforum/DCForumID45/237.html http://www.google.de/search?q=cache:Oswzqmgy5eEJ:www.f25.parsimony.net/forum62454/messages/18396.htm+%22reno+clemann%22&hl=de http://www.google.de/search?q=cache:NbotozU2JvkJ:www.rechtsanwalt-resch.de/faelle.php+%22reno+clemann%22&hl=de http://www.google.de/search?q=cache:0zwZZxLPVo4J:www.amtsgericht-potsdam.org/hr/q4-03/harbneu.htm+%22reno+clemann%22&hl=de http://www.google.de/search?q=cache:EGblylSW_BgJ:www.rbb-online.de/_/fernsehen/magazine/beitrag_dru&#8230;


Mittwoch, 21. Januar 2004, 20:16

Forenbeitrag von: »strix«

z.B.

Vielleicht dort einfach mal nachfragen, MfG, strix http://www.rechtsanwalt-resch.de/pages/kapitalanlagen_bankenhaftung.htm


  • // <![CDATA[
    // < ![CDATA[
    // < ![CDATA[
    // < ![CDATA[
    //
  • 1
  • 2

» Russlands Creme de la Creme kauft bei Sergej Vachn … 01.03.2011

» Keine Vorkasse an Erbenermittler 30.10.2009

» Beluga: Interessengemeinschaft gegen Oaktree-Schre … 07.03.2011

» Nur die Reeder wollen noch den floppenden Deutschl … 06.07.2010

» Mehr KfW-Geld für Fenster und Heizungen 09.03.2009

» Archiv: Pressemeldungen

// <![CDATA[
// < ![CDATA[
// < ![CDATA[
// < ![CDATA[
// “+String.fromCharCode(60)+”/script>”);
// ]]>
// ]]>
// ]]>// // <![CDATA[
// < ![CDATA[
// < ![CDATA[
// < ![CDATA[
// // <![CDATA[
// < ![CDATA[
// < ![CDATA[
// < ![CDATA[
// // // // // // // // // // // //

// <![CDATA[
// < ![CDATA[
// < ![CDATA[
// < ![CDATA[
// // <![CDATA[
// < ![CDATA[
// < ![CDATA[
// < ![CDATA[
// // <![CDATA[
// < ![CDATA[
// < ![CDATA[
// < ![CDATA[
// // <![CDATA[
// < ![CDATA[
// < ![CDATA[
// < ![CDATA[
// // <![CDATA[
// < ![CDATA[
// < ![CDATA[
// < ![CDATA[
// // <![CDATA[
// < ![CDATA[
// < ![CDATA[
// < ![CDATA[
// // <![CDATA[
// < ![CDATA[
// < ![CDATA[
// < ![CDATA[
// // <![CDATA[
// < ![CDATA[
// < ![CDATA[
// < ![CDATA[
// // <![CDATA[
// < ![CDATA[
// < ![CDATA[
// < ![CDATA[
// // <![CDATA[
// < ![CDATA[
// < ![CDATA[
// < ![CDATA[
// // <![CDATA[
// < ![CDATA[
// < ![CDATA[
// < ![CDATA[
//

 Weiterer Beweis: Darum ist Jochen Resch GoMoPa Goldman und Manfred Resch Morgenstern

// <![CDATA[
// < ![CDATA[
// < ![CDATA[
// < ![CDATA[
// // <![CDATA[
// < ![CDATA[
// < ![CDATA[
// < ![CDATA[
// // <![CDATA[
// < ![CDATA[
// < ![CDATA[
// < ![CDATA[
// // <![CDATA[
// < ![CDATA[
// < ![CDATA[
// < ![CDATA[
// // <![CDATA[
// < ![CDATA[
// < ![CDATA[
// < ![CDATA[
// // <![CDATA[
// < ![CDATA[
// < ![CDATA[
// < ![CDATA[
// // <![CDATA[
// < ![CDATA[
// < ![CDATA[
// < ![CDATA[
// // <![CDATA[
// < ![CDATA[
// < ![CDATA[
// < ![CDATA[
// // <![CDATA[
// < ![CDATA[
// < ![CDATA[
// < ![CDATA[
// // <![CDATA[
// < ![CDATA[
// < ![CDATA[
// < ![CDATA[
// // <![CDATA[
// < ![CDATA[
// < ![CDATA[
// < ![CDATA[
//

Mehr als 3.400 Opfer ohne Beweise: Die Opferliste der frei erfundenen “Goldman, Morgenstern u. Partner” alias Serienbetrüger “GoMoPa” in 2010 und 2011

Liebe Leser,

DIE “GoMoPa”-Opferliste 2010 – getarnt als “Warnliste” von den fingierten “Goldman, Morgenstern u. Partnern” erstellt

Folgende Firmen und Personen wurden u.a. von Peter Ehlers (wenn er denn so heisst) und “GoMoPa”, dem STASI-”NACHICHTENDIENST” seit Jahresanfang 2010– ohne jeden Beweis – verunglimpft und verleumdet u.a mit fingierten Presseberichten, fingierten Anzeigen und insbesondere im fingierten “OMoPa”-Berufsverbrecherportal verleumdet, um daraus Profit für Ihren postkommunistischen Saftladen zu schlagen:

GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
2
 Anton
 Abdul Sheikh
 Abraham
 Akcay
 Aksoy
 Aktürk
 Alexandre
 Alsguth
 Arnold
 Arnol Arslan
 Artschwager
 A & G Insurance Corporation
A & O Finanz- und Immobilenvertriebsservice GmbH
A+B Finanz
A+K Fina
 AA Capital
 ABAG BETEI
 Abbey House Acquisitions
 ABC Finanzdienst
 Accent-Finanz GmbH
 ACCENTA IMMOBILIEN MANAGEMENT AG
 ACI Alternative Capital Invest GmbH
 Acoreus Collection Service
 Acorn Consulting
 Activ 3000 GmbH
 Activa GmbH
 Activa Wirtschaftsberatung GmbH
 Actiwa Vermittlung von Finanz- und Vorsorgekonzepten e.K.
 Adeshieman Company
 Aditus Fonds GbR
 Admus AG
 Adolph & Komorsky International GmbH
 Advance Invest AG
 ADVANCE INVEST AG S.A.
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
3
 Advanced Group Kuwait
 Advanced Program Trading AG
 Advin Consult Finanzierungsvermittlungs GmbH
 Advisa Consulting GmbH
 Aeternus Energy Corp
 AFG AMERICAN FINANCIAL GROUP INC.
 Agentur Herold
 Agentur Leif Schurig
 AGR Allgemeine Gewerbedatei e.K.
 Ahorn Trust AG
 AIF Bank & Trust Company
 AJPA Broker SA
 Akeman Capital
 AKJ Allgemeine Leasing AG
 AKJ Privatfinanz AG
 AKJ-Firmengruppe
 AKK Dienstleistungs GmbH
 Aktienpower AG
 AktienPowerMarketing GmbH
 Akzenta AG
 Albion Investment Management
 Alexander Freiherr von Pillnitz & Berenberg Treuhandgesellschaft 1908 Limited
 Allgemeine Giro 24 GmbH
 ALLGEMEINE IMMOBILIEN-BÖRSE GmbH
 ALMO Hausbau GmbH
 Alpha Finanzsanierungs GmbH
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
4
 Alpha Oil Inc.
 Alphapool AG
 Alpina Finanz GmbH
 Alternative Capital Invest
 ALV Auto-Leasing und Vermietungs GmbH
 Alvino Group
 AMBROS/VBS
 American Investment & Finance Corporation
 AMK Akustikbau GmbH
 AMK Immobilienbetreuung GmbH
 Anderson & Goldberg S. L.
 Anderson McCormack Group S.L
 Anderton Stoner&Partner
 Anglo African Minerals plc
 Ango-Käufer-Service GmbH & Co. KG
 Antassia GmbH
 Anthony & Carter
 Apex Investments Corporation
 Apex Trading Group
 Applied Cash International
 APT Advanced Program Trading AG
 Aquaorbis AG
 ARCADIA Finanz- & Wirtschaftsberatung
 Arena GmbH
 Argos Finanz GmbH
 Ario AG
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
5
 Armaco
 Art Bauträger u. Immobilienhandelsgesellschaft mbH
 Artemis Financial
 AS Bau Berlin
 ASC AG für Satellitenkommunikation
 ASCANIA Vermögensverwaltung
 Ascor Media Ltd.
 ASG GmbH
 Assecura-Assecuranz Vermittlungs GmbH
 Associated Management Group
 Associated Management Group (AMG Zurich)
 Aston Rowe Consulting Advisory
 Atlantis Exploration AG
 Atlantis-Genossenschaft
 Au Vi Product GmbH
 Aufina Holding
 Aurora Gold Corp.
 Australian Lottery
 Autosafe Parkhaus AG
 Autotester 24
 AVAG Allgemeine Vermögensverwaltung AG
 AVAG-Funds
 AVD AG
 AVM AG
 AvW Invest AG
 AXXIOM AG
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
6
 Azalenia Basel AG
 Amaxopoulus
 Arntzen
 Aniol
 Altmann, Dr.
 Assenmacher
 Appel
 Aulenbach
 Aengenheister
 Amonath
 Asmus
 Almer
 Anlauf
 Aniol
 Blon von
 Barney
 Bajcar
 Bronischewski
 Butler
 Becker
 Berger
 Burat
 Buettner
 Behring
 Baumert
 Becker
 Bünning
 Bok
 Bahcecioglu
 Bahceli
 Balicioglu
 Balogh
 Barteczko
 Becker
 Bergenthal
 Bindokat
 Böhrer
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
7
 Born
 Bortstein
 Busch
 Böhm
 Braun
 Blum
 B u. S Technologie GmbH
 Bachmann Roth Advisory
 Badenia Bausparkasse
 Bagleys Investment Company
 Baltica Savings & Investment Cop.
 Bank Leumi AG
 Bankgesellschaft Berlin
 Banque Bruxelles Lambert (BBL)
 Barlow & Ramsey
 Barringer and Co.
 Basel Institutional
 Basic Trading Solution Ltd.
 Bau- und Grund Immobilien GmbH
 Bauconsult Gesell. für Haus- u. Grundbesitz
 Baucontrol GmbH
 Baufinanzierungszentrum Berlin – Karlshorst
 BAV-Konzept Versicherungsmakler GmbH
 Bavaria Invest Finanzmanagement
 Bavaria Trading Company
 Baye Invest
 BÖRSENPOWER Coaching und Verwaltungsges.m.b.H.
 BBAP Assekuranzmakler & Finanzdienstleistungs GmbH
 BeFa Invest GbmH & Co KG
 BelSwissBank
 BEMA Investitions- und Beteiligungsgesellschaft GmbH
 Benedict Lifeline GmbH
 BENEDICT Star GmbH
 Benitex AG
 Benson & Raymond Acquisition
 Berger Daniel
 Bergues Invest SA
 Bestgambling.Com
 BESTLIFESELECT AG
 BF Bayerische Baufinanz GmbH
 BFS Neckarsulm
 BFTS AG Schweiz
 BHG Baugenossenschaft Hockenheim e.G
 BIK Bauträger
 Biotech Development
 Bishop & Parkes Advisory
 Blanc & Baumar
 Blinder International
 BLISTER YACHTING GMBH
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
8
 Bloomfield Consulting AG
 Bond and Future Group Ltd.
 Bonetti & Wilmers
 Bonus Bauträgergesellschaft mbH
 Borsa Financial Inc.
 BR Consultance Alfaz S.L.
 Branchenklick
 Branko Financial Service
 BRAZIL-INVEST-VC LTDA
 RDS-Dienstleistungen
 Breadley Steigenberger & Partner (BSP)
 BREBA Invest S.L.
 Brentana Wohnbau GmbH
 Brett Commodities GmbH
 Bright Capital Banker Ltd
 Britannia Swiss Equities – BSE AG
 Brodowski Dach- und Fassadenbau GmbH
 Brodowski und Deyna Immobilien GmbH
 Brokers Society Sociedad de Gesti? Tramitaci Financier
 Brown & Lampe U.S. Portfolio Management Ltd.
 BSD GmbH
 Bullion Trading Group
 Bund der Verbraucher (BDV)
 Burbach Consulting GmbH
 Business Partner Credit GmbH
 Brauer
 Bogatz
 Birner
 Bastert
 Baeuerle
 Bertges
 Barteczko
 Bertges
 Beyer
 Bogatz
 Bender
 Bens
 Bösebeck
 Bouderi
 Baan
 Bender
 Birkins
 BECK
 Barthel
 Beyreuther
 Banghard
 Bohrmann
 Bauer
 Bludau
 Bajcar
 Bernhart
 Belkenheid
 Barthel
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
9
 Baumbach
 Barde
 Casula
 Carsten
 Celik
 Cengiz
 Clemann
 Cura
 Cuti
 Cuti
 Campa
 C & P Mutual
 C. Gewerbeimmobilien
 Callux Forderungsmanagement
 Calvin & Sanderson Associates
 Cambridge Asset Management AG
 Cameron Poe & Associates Inc.
 CAP-NETWORK AG
 Capital Securities International
 Capitalinform Limited SA
 Capitalinform Limited SA
 Car Leasing Agency Ltd.
 Carsten Haus GmbH
 Carver Brooks & Associates Ltd.
 Cash Group AG
 Cash-Immobilien GmbH
 Cashselect
 CasMaker Ltd.
 Castor Capital
 Cater & Sattler OHG
 Caviar Creator Inc
 CB Freie Versicherungsmakler GmbH
 CBC
 CDH AG
 Census Grund GmbH & Co KG
 Centracon
 Centracon Investment AG
 Centro Euro Service AG
 Centro Euro Service AG
 Centro-Service GmbH
 Ceptum AG
 Ceres Warenhandels- und Beratungsgesellschaft mbH
 Certus Consulting
 CH Devisen Macht SA
 CHEAPLY SMOKING CLUB
 Chiemgauer Vermögensverwaltung
 Chips Virtual Casino
 CIC Insurance Company SA
 Cinerenta Gesellschaft für Internationale Filmproduktion mbH
 Cis Deutschland AG
 City Hyp Finanzierungsvermittlung
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
10
 City Zins Finanzierungsvermittlungs AG
 CL Inkasso AG
 CL Inkasso AG
 Clean Lease GmbH
 CLEAN PATENT GMBH
 Club Alanzo VIP Cruises
 CMP Global Consulting Ltd
 CMX Capital Markets Exchange AG
 CNP Casino
 Colebrooke Management Holdings
 Color für Kinder e.V.
 Comitas Agentur VSV
 Commercial Development Bank
 Commercial First Trading Corporation
 Complete Commodity Trading
 Comroad AG
 ComTex Vermögens- und Verwaltungs GmbH
 OMVAL Capital AG
 Concorde International – Business Consultants
 Condor Gold and Minerals Inc.
 Conductis GmbH
 Conik Invest
 Coninvest Finanz AG
 Conradi & Hilger Gbr mbH
 Consens Gesellschaft für Projektentwicklung u. Vermittlung von Immobilien
 Consolidated Capital Management Limited (CCML)
 Content Services Ltd.
 Contracta Grundstücksmanagement GmbH
 Convent Consulting GmbH
 CONVERGEX CARIBBEAN, LTD.
 Conzeptfinance Ltd.
 Cooperativa Extranjero de Credito y Investiamento SA
 Cornhill Management S.L.
 Cosena Management S.L.
 CP Medien AG
 CPTD – Central Patent & Trademark Database
 CR Consulting GmbH
 Credit for you Limited
 Credit Mirabaud
 Creditnet Bank Internationale
 CS Capital Service GmbH
 CST Umwelttechnik und Innovation e.G.
 Cumulus Gesellschaft für Immobilien- Investitionen mbH
 Cura Investitions- und Beteiligungsgesellschaft
 Cmok
 Cordes
 Chuen
 Drabnitzke
Dana
Dogs
Doll
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
11
Doujak
Dziuba
Dorsch
Becker
DAK Finanz
Danaro Invest
Asset Management
DAT Finance AG
DBVI AG
De Lotto Switzerland
Delmont Wealth Management
Deltoton AG
DEM Marketing
Demirok GmbH Bauunternehmen
Densch & Schmidt GmbH
Der Informant GmbH
Deutsche Contracting GmbH
Deutsche Immobilien Grundvermögen Holding AG
Deutsche Mentor für Finanzen (DMFF) e.K.
Deutsche Mentor für Finanzen AG
Deutschen Anlage- und Beteiligungs Aktiengesellschaft (Dabag)
Develop Management GmbH
Deyna Immobilien GmbH
DHB-Dreiländer-Handels und Beteiligungsgesellschaft Walter Fink KG
Die Agentur
Die Tradergemeinschaft – Best of Marketing SARL
Dierig Unternehmensberatung
DIHA Dienstleistungs – und Handel GmbH
DIP AG
DIREKTE VERMÖGENSBERATUNGSGESELLSCHAFT MBH
Direkter Anlegerschutz e.K.
Distefora Holding AG
Dividium Capital Ltd
DLF-Immobilienportfolio-Walter-Fink KG
DM Beteiligungen AG
DMI Derivatives Management Inc.
DMP-Gruppe
DMV – Deutsche Markenverlängerungs GmbH
Dohmen-Invest
Domizil Immobilien Leasing GmbH
Domusfinanz
Dow Win Financial Group Corporation
DPMV-Deutsche Patent- und Markenverlängerung GmbH
Dr. Antonio GAMPA
Dr. Bassam Bouderi
Dr. Cornelius Gregorius Consulting Inc
Dr. Gerbig Treuhand GmbH
Dr. Görlich Grundbesitzbeteiligungs GmbH
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
12
Dr. Hanne Grundstücks GmbH
Dr. Hartmannsdorf Immobilien GmbH
Dr. Mayer & Cie. GmbH
Dr. Peters
Dr. Schmitt Inc.
Dr. Werner Financial Service AG
Dragon Partners Inc.
Dreiländerfonds DLF
Dreiländerfonds DLF-94/17
Drexel Management GmbH
Dubai International Investment & Trading
Dubai-1000-Hotel-Fonds
Duesenberg Financial Group Inc.
Dunas de Corralejo S.L.
Dupont Conseille AG
Dux Partners AG
Dörflinger
Dallüge
Deutsch
Dittel
Dierkes
Deubelbeiss
Dallinger
Drewitz
Eichhorn
Erber
Elbert
Ebner
Eroglu
Eschinger
Ettelt
Evcil
E-Money Power (EMPFX)
E.U.R.O.- Unternehmens- & Wirtschaftsberatungs- Ltd.
EAG AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT für WIRTSCHAFT
Earnshaw Advisory Services
Earthsearch Communications Inc.
Easy Concept Hamburg KG ( E@sy )
EBC AG
EBCON – Europäische Verbraucherberatung
Ebcon Europäische Verbraucherberatung AG
Ecco
Economy Capital Corporation
Ecotrend Holding AG
ECP Euro Caribbean Properties Ltd.
ECTO GmbH
Ecumoney Limited
Edgar Heumann GmbH
EECH AG
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
13
EEIG – Europäische Wirtschaftskammer
Effekten- und Edelmetallberatungs GmbH
Effinance Private Equity AG
EKC
Elbe Emissionshaus
Elefant Immobilien GmbH
EM.TV AG
EMA Event Management Agentur GmbH
Embdena
Emmerson Bennett
Empresa Minera (Bergbau) AG
Enexoma AG
Equinox Private Consultants Ltd.
ERGO-Plan
Erich Holderer Finanzdiestleistungen
ESKATA Finanz- Immobilien- Handels GmbH
ESTEKAR LIMITED
Estreel GmbH & Co.KG
EuMedien
Eurefi Eurefi Holding AG
Euregio Immobilien L&F B.V.
EURENTA Gesellschaft für Anlagen-, Renten- und Sparkonzeptionen GmbH
EURENTA Gesellschaft für Marketing- und Promotion GmbH
Euring GmbH
EURO CREDIT UNION
EURO Finanz Consult AG
Euro Finanz Management
Euro Kapital AG
Euro Real Investment Company
Euro Trading GmbH
Euro-American Beteiligungsvermittlungsg. MbH
EURO-CONSULT e.K.
Euro-Pool AG
EUROCAPITAL BANK INC.
Eurocapital Investment Corporation
EURODOM Berlin GmbH
Eurogoldtrader
Eurokapital AG
Eurolink Consult GmbH
European Estates&Investment AG
European Kings Club
European Trade marks and Designs
European Trademark Organisation S.A.
Europäische Schuldenregulierungs- und Ausgleichsanstalt
Europäische Wirtschaftskammer für Handel, Gewerbe und Industrie
EUROTRADE & CONSULTING AG
Eurotrust Capital Management
EV&K
Evantus Invest
EVD Direktverkaufs AG
EWR Wirtschaftsdatenregister
Exakt Martkanalysen Research GmbH
Exeltrade
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
14
Engels
Eder
Esser
Elas
Ehrenberg
Eilts
Eich
Eich
Eder
Engler
EISENBERG
 Felgner
Flug
Feyh
Freke
Florian
Fasan
Fritsch
Freiherr von Fink
Fink
Ferrera Dr. F & P Aktiengesellschaft & Co. KG
F.I.P. GmbH
F.V.F
FA. Haustein Finanzvermittlung
Fafa Capital
Faktor 1 GmbH
Falcon Euro Trading Limited
Falcon Oil Group
Falk Capital AG
Falk-Gruppe
Falken Depot Management GmbH
Falken GmbH
Falken Vermögensverwaltung GmbH
FALLON BANCROFT HOLDING
Fashionact Industries Inc.
Noske
FB Bauträger GmbH
FDMV FINANZDIENSTLEISTUNGEN
FFB Dörflinger GmbH
FFCC Verwaltungs GmbH & Co. Finanzdienstleistungs KG
FG Finanz-Service AG
FGP & Cie
Fibeg Finanzberatung- und Vermögensverwaltungs GmbH
Fibu AG
Fideles & Associates AG
Fidelity International
FIDU payment services S.A.
Finama Vermögensverwaltungs KG
Finance Concept GmbH
Finance Service International
Financial Consulting
Financial Consulting UK Limited
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
15
Financial Planning Systems Ltd.
Financieros Panama – Societaet Rodriguez Batista Diaz
Finanz Score GbR
Finanz Service Hennig
Finanzprogramme Bentley & Partner
FINANZtest Center
Finanzvermittlung Fritz Guth
Finanzvermittlung und Wirtschaftsdienst Ott GmbH
Finbrands Global Limited
Fine Trading Group Finvest Asset Management
FIPTR Federated Institute for Patent- &
Trademark Registry First Canadian Joint Venture
& Consulting Inc. First Canadian Joint Venture
& Consulting Inc. (Canada)
First China Corporate Management Group
First Garant Fund AG First Intercontinental
Bancorp. Ltd. First Invest Grundbesitz
GmbH First Invest Swiss Trade
First Real Estate Grundbesitz GmbH
First Saxonia Trading Ltd
Flash Finance Floris Bank
FOCUS Immobilien und Projektbau GmbH
FOKUS INVEST AG Foma Internationale
Inkassogesellschaft mbH
Fondax Capital Trust GmbH & Co. KG
Fondshaus Hamburg FORBIS Corporation
Force Worldwide Investments Corp
Foreign Exchange Clearing House Ltd.
Forest Finance Service GmbH
Forex4free Forexone-Broker
Forst Finance AG Four Stars AG
Frankonia Sachwert AG FRD International
Free Finance -Service Futura Finanz AG
Futura-Concept GmbH FXTSwiss
Fridez Fridez
Frau Floßbach
Fritz Franko
Frerichs Fink
Fridez Fasan
Filsinger
Freiherr von Lepel
Frydenlund Foetzsch
Fridez Fridez
Fitz
Grüters
Geyer
Gonnes
Grüner
Gerlach
Gast
Gräbedünkel
Gustav

GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
16
Güttig
Gläßer
Gehle
Gerome
GOLDEN-BALLARIN
Golsch
Gronemeyer
Görlich
Götzl
Gaber
Graupner
Guth
G+M Baubetreuung GmbH
G.V.V. bR.
G.W.F. Grundwert-Bauträger G.M.B.H
Gaiacor International PLC
Galant Immobilien GmbH
Garant Kreditvermittlung
Garant-Hundsdorff-Istanbul
GEBAB
Gebrüder Schmidtlein GbR
GEcoS Holding AG
Geldfinder GmbH
Gemas GmbH
Genius Insurance Service GmbH
Genius Investments – Genius Funds
Geoteck Inc.
Gerd Esser Grundbesitz GmbH
GerGermania Grundbesitz AG
Germania Venture Capital AG
Gesellschaft für Erbenermittlung
Gesellschaft für Exklusive Veranstaltungen Dortmund mbH
Gesellschaft für Finanz- u. Wirtschaftsdienstleistungen (FiWi)
Gesellschaft zur Datensicherung im Internet (GSDI)
Gesellschaft zur Vermittlung kapitalorientierter Finanzanlagen GmbH (GVFK)
GetAssisted Group
GfS Invest GmbH
GGHF Windpark Sitten GmbH & Co. KG
GHS Unternehmensgruppe
GIP Grundstücks-Immobilien & Projektmanagement GmbH
GIV Gesellschaft für Immobilien und Vermögensverwaltung mbH
Glatt & Partner GmbH
GLOBAL – BAU Immobilien GmbH
Global AWS AG
Global Capital Group
Global Cogenix Industrial Corp.
Global Financial Invest AG
Global Foreign Exchange (Switzerland) AG
GLOBAL LIFESTYLE GROUP S.A.
Global Mineral Resources Corp.
Global Pension Plan
Globaltraiding.com Kapitalmanagement
Globalus (Immobilien) Gmbh & Co. KG
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
17
GM Capital Partners
GMF Finanz AG
GMF Treuhandgesellschaft mbH
GO AHEAD SERVICE LTD
GOJ AG
Gold-Barren-Silber.com
Gold-Versandhandel
Goldstein & Partner Inc.
GOT Thimm GmbH
GPS GmGrand Capital Ltd
Great Berlin Wheel GmbH & Co. KG
Grevenreuth AG
Grund und Boden Beteiligungs AG
Grundstücksgemeinschaft Arslan
Grupo Esdinero
Grünewälder GmbH
GSM Gesellschaft für Professionelles Sachwert Management AG
GSM Gesellsc
GTO Gap Trading Online
Gulf Oil Exploration Inc.
GVW – Wirtschaftsclub
GWG Gesellschaft für Wirtschaftsplanung mbH
Göttinger Gruppe
Göttler Finanz AG
Graf
Guillaume
Gropper
Göker
Grotelaers
Günzel
Gelbke
Haugg
Halbey
Händel
Hansen
Heise
Hensel
Hipp
Hirner
Hirth
Heider
Hickl
Hansel
Hauser
Härtel
Heckler
Hambusch Prof.
Herold
Hering Dr.
Herr Budzinski
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
18
Heyer
Hering Dr.
Hartung
Hesselmann
Hettrich
Heiner
Händel
Heinrich
Hartl
Hansch
Hartung
Hepp
Heinekken van
Hanne
Heiliger
Heumann
Hensley-Piroth
Haffa
Holderer
Helfer
Heckmann
Hormann
Hennig
Hermsmeier
Hornberger
Halabi
Herr Gieselmann
Hundsdorff
Hanisch
Hornig
Hambusch Prof.
H.R.L. International
H2O Swiss AG
Hafenstein Marketing GmbH
Hamburg Connection
Hamilton Associates A.G.
Handelshaus Schaar
Handelskontor Fischer
Hansa Treuhand
Hanse Capital
Hanse Club
Hanseatische AG
Hanseatische Senatorenkanzlei
Hansefina GmbH
Hartl Immobilien
Hartl Immobilienmanagement GmbH
Harz Börde Finanz
Haus- und Vermögensverwaltung GmbH (HaVeWa)
Hauser Treuhand Rorschach HTR
Haushaltsfuchs
HB Capital Partners
HBW-Finanz AG
HCI Capital
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
19
HDL Hausdienstleistungsgesellschaft mbH
Helvag AG
Helvetia Treuhand GmbH
Helvetia Treuhand-Union GmbH
Hentsch & Müller S.A.
Hermes Beteiligungs AG
Hermes Portfolio Management GmbH
Bens
HKA-Bank 1954 Ltd.
HNH Finanzberatung-Treuhand GmbH
Horn Wolfgang Dr.
HouseFX AG
HTB Holding
HuHWH International AG
Hypo – Leasing B.V.
Heinen
Hagen
Hoff
Hensel
Hampe
Hauser Metzler
Harksen
Huber
Hartung
Hübner
Hönnscheidt
Hettrich
Hering Dr.
Hettrich
Hübner
Ihl
Izmirlioglu
Izmirlioglu
Immega
I-investorclub Ltd.
I.B.F.T.P.R. International Bureau for Federated Trademark Patent Register
I.B.I.P. International Bureau for Intellectual Property
I.F.I. Ltd. Milincic
IAZ & Partners
IBB GmbH
IBB INTERNATIONAL
IBEKA Immobilienbeteiligung AG
IBH Limited
ICB – Intercontinental Brokerage Corporation
ICM Basel
IContent GmbH
Idee Immo Concept GmbH
Idilei-Treuinvest
IFF AG Zukunftsunternehmen für Investment, Fonds, Finanzen
IFIC Integra Financial Consulting GmbH
IFS International Financial Services Inc.
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
20
IHB Immobilien Heinen & Biege GmbH
IKF
Immorenta Immobilienbeteiligungsgesellschaft mbH
Imperia Invest IBC
Indara Projekt AG
Indices International Group IIG
Info-ZentralInformations-Service-Center (ISC)
Inkasso Team Moskau / TMA GmbH
Innoflex
Innovatio Allfinanz & Franchise System AG
INT Elektrizitätswerk Beteiligungs KG
Integral Finanz AG
Integral Treuhand Vermögensverwaltung GmbH
Integro Capital Partners
Intellectual Property Agency Ltd.
Inter Alpen AG
Inter Capital Bank
Inter Capital Bank Ltd.
Inter Credit Group
Interbank Asset Management Group AG / InterBank AG
Intercontinental Financial Developments Plc.
Interessensgemeinschaft Barbara Merkens
Interfinance Investment & Credits
Interglob AG
INTERMEX International Ltd.
International Bioremediation Services Inc.
International Insurance Holding Inc.
International Invest Ltd
International Travel Services Ltd.
Internet Media AG
Internetwebshop
Inventaire Pro
Inveractivos
InvestInvestor Relations Corp.
Inveteratus Asset Management
IOPTS International Organization for Patent & Trademark Service Corporation
IPS AG – Internationale Produktvermarktungs Systeme
ISR Management & Consulting Ltd
ISS Immobilien Schutz und Service AG (ISS AG)
ISS Immobilienschutz und Service AG
ITL-Enterprises Inc.
Immega
Ibekwe
Just
Jochum
Jester
Junges
Jaeger Research GmbH
Jefferies Associates Group
Jejkal AG Strategische Investments
Johnsons Banking Group
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
21
Johnsons Banking Group
Joseph Cooke Ltd.
Julius Brown AG
Jump
Jachnicki
Jaufmann
Jansson
Jonas
Jedlitschka
Junghänel
Junghänel
Junghänel
Juratsch
Jentzer
Jilg
Jung
Karabunar
Kriewald
Knobloch
Kinner
Käner
Kontze
Kratz
Kostas
Körner
Keffel – Fallahi
Kaiser
Klein
Klaas
Krenzer
Kletsch
Kappes
Kloiber
Kiehl
Kappes
KlaffenböcKraushaar
Kleefisch
Krefft
Klaffenböck
Kaltofen
Kühnen
K & S -Frisia
K&K. B. P. Vermögensverwaltung
K1 Group
K1-Group
Kaikatsu Group
Kanzlei Knil
Kanzlei Range & Partner
Kapital-Consult GmbH
Karriere AG
Köllner-Unternehmensgruppe
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
22
König & Cie
KCP Bank
Kingside Establishment
Kirkland Lee
KK ImmobilienFonds I AG & Co. KG a.A.
Kleeblatt4U
Koch & Eilts GmbH & Co. KG
Koh-I-Noor
Konnex ImmoInvest GmbH
Konsumgüter Direktvertrieb e.V
Kredit einfach Vermittlungs GmbH
Krug Immobilien GmbH
KSF Korrespondenz-Service für Finanzsysteme
KSK International Ltd.
KubKusch und Partner GmbH
Kutag Capital Partners AG
Kutag Group
Kuwait Finance & Investment Company
KVG Internationale Kapitalvermittlung
KVV-Profi Management- und Beteiligung AG
KWD-Marketing
Kühne Bauspar- und Finanzierungsfachbüro
Küng & Partner Vermögensverwaltung AG
Klaffenböck
Klostermann
Keiner
Klappenbach
Klappenbach
Kastler
Kuzmanovic
Kraus
Keil
Kulecki
Kahnhäuser
Klein
Kuhlee
Karabunar
K.
Knobloch
Kiok
Klinge
Koehn
Kuhlen
Lebinger
Lorenz
Luft
Lampe
Leonhard
LehnoLohmann
Lohmann
Lee
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
23
Leindecker
Lökkevik
Lucky Prices S.L.
Lepel Freiherr von
Lemke
Linder
Littig
Langanke
Limburg
Laubach
Lins
Lüthi
LAM Immobilien- und Beteiligungs AG
Landesbank Berlin – LBB/IBV Fonds
Landmark Invest Ltd.
Lange Vermögensberatung GmbH
Lange Vermögensberatung GmbH
Langenbahn AG
LBB-Fonds
LDG Capital Markets Company Limited
Lenz Immobilienhandel AG
Life
Lifetime Products Inc.
Liquid Asset Management Inc.
Lisser Consulting
Litz United GmbH & Co. KG
Locat – Projektsteuerung GmbH
Locstein Asset Management AG
Logotype Klostermann, Lässig
London Hong Kong Exchange plc
LPA Financial Services
LSC. Ltd.
Ltd. Ifi
LVA Garant Fund Inc.
Lichtenfels
Lenz
Leuze
Lengdorfer
Lutz
Marien
Möbius
Müller
Müller
Mohm
Morgenstern
Markof
Müller Dr.
Mathy
Müller
Miersch
Matten
24
Moulatsiotis
MichalMatthiesen
Milincic
Matthies
Merkens
Marx
Meyer
Madden Group Inc.
Magnus GmbH&CO KG
MALAYSIA Credit
Malaysiacredit Van Bergen Corp.
Mallorca Trading
Malmsbury, Harrington and Seaford
Maonara AG
Marine Shuttle AS
Marine Shuttle Operations Inc.
Mark Marketing S.R.O.
Matic-Verlagsgesellschaft mbH
Matterhorn International
Mayer und Cie GmbH
MC Management Consulting & Financial Services
MCC Mariaux Chevre & Cie
McKenzie-Boyle Associates
Med-Synergy Mallorca GmbH & Co. KG
Media Concepte
Media Inkassomanagement AG
Media-Com LTD & Co. KG
Medivest
MEG AG
Mercaforex – Silver Holdings International Ltd.
Mercantus AG
Mercury Forex Investments Assets Ltd.
Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd
METROPOL LEASING GMBH
MFIVE Ltd.
MFS 24
MG Beteiligungs AG
MICONA LTD.
MidAtlantic Holdings plc
Minera Real del Barqueno S.A.
Mitschka Alternative Advisory
MJS Developments S.A.
MK Service & Vertrieb
MK- Service & Vertrieb
MMC Medialog Marketing Company
MMCIS Investments
Mobilica.de
MOLY-FLON LIMITED
Money and Capital ASS.
Money Plus Worldwide Financial Limited
MonMach Marine Insurance Company Ltd.
Morgan Franklin Investment Inc.
MPC Capital
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
25
MPC Capital AG
Mueller Capital Management (MCM)
Multi Advisor Fund I GbR
MWB Vermögensverwaltungs AG
Mehler
MÖLLER-BÜCKINS
Montag
Morris
Manns
Meyer
Mundt
MILLS
McGregor
Müller
 Nicolic
Noske
Neumann
Naumann
Nieder
Noske
Nitsche
Natea Financial Transactions Division
Nationales Markenregister AG
Natur- und Erlebniswelt Schmölln GmbH
NEO TECH PUBLISHING COMPANY INC.
Net Mobile AG
Netsolutions FZE
NEUBERT & PARTNER FINANZMANAGEMENT GMBH
Neuburg Financial AG
Neue Medien GmbH
New Century Capital
NEW Naturpark und Erlebniswelt Schmölln
New World Financial
Newton Forest
Noble Advisory Group
Nodorf und Partner
Non plus ultra Marketing GmbH
Nord Finanz KG
Nord-Analyse/Jürgen Harksen
Nordcapital
Norddeutsche Vermögensverwaltung
North Am GmbH
NOVI BETEILIGUNGS GMBH
NUEVO GMBH
NWK Consulting
NYTS New York Trading Services Ltd.
Nünlist
Noack
 Ohles
Ohlmann
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
26
Obermann
Ohlenschläger
Ottersbach
O Online Casino
OBA OBJEKTPLANUNGS UND BAUGESELLSCHAFT MBH
Obtime GmbH
Ocean s Continental AG
EKOFINANZ PIPER & FISCHER (ÖKOFINANZ)
Offshore Shuttle AS
Olaf Tank – Rechtsanwalt
OLF OBERLAUSITZER FACTORING UND LEASING GMBH
OMNIKRON VERWALTUNGSGESELLSCHAFT MBH
Soldwisch
Optimal-Unternehmensgruppe
Opus one Corporation
Organi Juris GmbH
ORGANIJURIS HOLDING AG
Ost Com Holding AG
Ownership Emissionshaus
Ommer
Oberle
Olek
 Petrenko
Prehn
Piroth
Pelz
Pfeiffer
Piroth
Pirkel
Pirkel
Petsch
Pröckel
Pirkel
Pilling
Pirkel
Paco Integrated Energy Inc.
Pacon Capital S.A.
Pacta Invest GmbH
PACTA-INVEST GmbH
Partner Air Limited
Partner-Computer-Group Ltd.
PayPay Inc.
PayPay S.a.r.l.
PCG
Pentafox Höhn OHG
Pepper United S.R.O.
Perfect4u
Pharma Kontor AG
Phillip Alexander Securities & Futures Ltd.
Phoenix Kapitaldienst GmbH
Phönix Aktiengesellschaft
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
27
Phönix Finanzsanierungs AG
Platinum Group International
Platonja GmbH
Plim Cooperation AG
PLUS CONCEPT GMBH
Plus Finanz Consulting GmbH
Postbank Finanzberatung AG
PPV Produkt-Promotion-Vertrieb
Pradofin
Premium Capital
Premium Firmenservice GmbH
Prime Core AG
Prime Gold Invest AG
Prime Select AG
Primus Consulting Optionshandel GmbH
Prinz zu Hohenlohe Jagstberg & Banghard GmbH
Private Commercial Office (PCO)
Private Equity Capital Group
Private Equity Invest AG
Private Fiduciary Trust GmbH
Private Investment Brokers and Financial Fonds Inc.
PRIZMA F.A. CENTER
Profi Moderne Wohnungsbaugenossenschaft
Profit.sawas.info
Projekta GmbH
Projostar GmbH
Prokon Kapital GmbH
Protectas Vermögensberatung GmbH
Protected International Inc.
PS-Leasing
Piroth
Petry
 Quinz
QES – Die Geldarchitekten
Quantum Asset Management
Quatro Group
QUEEN GMBH
Quinz Jürgen
Quorum AG
 Riesen van
Reegen
Riviera
Rose
Reinke
Ruppert
Rautenberg
Rüdenauer
Rist
Röll
Rohde
Runyeon
Rieß de Sanchez
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
28
Rachensperger
Ramin
Rohde
Range
Reich
Rummelt
Runyeon
Reimers
Rohbeck
R&S GmbH
R.A.P. Vermögensanlagen-Aktiengesellschaft & Co. KG Immobilienverwaltung
Racingkasino.Com
Rainbow Real Estate Ltd.
Ralph Hübner Verlag
Ranston Ltd
Ranston Ltd.
Ravena Finanz Management AG
RDV GmbH
Real Estate AG
Rechtsanwalt Asmus
Register of Commerce – Markenregisterverzeichnis
Renko & Associates
Renta / Löwer
Rentmeister KG
Res Justitia GmbH
Residencia GmbH
Rheinisch Westfälische Grundbesitz AG
Richmond & Palmer Investments Inc
Riverblue GmbH
RK-invest intern. Ltd.
RKI Invest
RKV Finanzservice
Robyns Capital GmbH
Robyns Vermögensverwaltung GmbH
Rodman & Shaw Ltd.
Rontax-Treuhand
Rosiak Dr.
Ruhrstrom GmbH
Ruluso Holding Ltd.
Rushton Limited
Ruspa Capital AG
Ruyan Europe
Richter
Reime
Richtsteig
Rademann
Rippel
 Sälinger
Schwarz
Stefan
Storm
Seuchter
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
29
Seumenicht
Schaefer
Scholl
Siegert
Schuhmann
Scharl
STRÖMBERG
Stanley
Splisteser
Sablowski
Schwarz
Stumpf
Scholz
Steigenberger
Schmidt
Seebacher
Sümper
Steuten
Schwartz
Simon
Schrämli
Spilker
Spanier
Seci
Stolte
Stolte
Schmid
Schmid
Schroeder
Seidel
Schmidtlein
Stangl
Steinbach
Stecker
Szulc
Schäfer
Spilker
Scholl
Stadelmaier
Shadi
Schäfer
Schmidt
Schaul
Sulser -Eggenberger
Schwarz
Sch.
S.
Schroeder Dr.
Schierloh
Sinn
Soldwisch
Smith
Schmidt
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
30
Schrenk
Schieweck
Schmidt
S.
Schmid
S&K Deutsche Sachwert AG
S.B.E. Bank
S.B.E. Financial SA
S.L.I.C.E AG
Sachsen Planke GmbH
Sachsenpark AG
Safe Inrest Quota Obtain Ltd (auch bekannt unter SIQO)
Sagro
Sakura Financial Group
SAM FINANZ AG – Swiss Asset Management
San West Inc.
Sauer & Söhne
Saxonia Sparkasse Inc.
SBAG – Schweizerische Börsenabwicklungsgesellschaft mbH
Schmid Immobilien Ltd.
Schmiedendorf Arzneimittelvertrieb AG
Schuhbecks am Platzl GmbH
Schutzvereinigung der Versicherten, Sparer und Kapitalanleger e. V.
Schwabenland Büro
Schweizer Kapital AG
SCT Bank Ltd.
SD Global Equity AG & Co. KG
Seabed Invest AG
SEB Bank AG
Sebeka GmbH
Secured Communications Limited
Securenta AG
Securities Regulatory and Investment Board (SRIB)
Senior Invest
Servicebüro Natter
SFP Private Banking
SFR AG (Swiss Finance Research AG)
Sherwood Henderson Limited
Shibby & Partners
Sigma Leasing Ltd.
Sigma Trading Limited
Signature Equities Agency GmbH
Signum Edelsteine GmbH
Sisko System Haus AG
Skyline Advisory Group
Solatera Energy AG
Sole Invest GmbH
Solventa Finanzservice GmbH
Sophisticated Investor Inc.
SP Trade Investment Capital Ltd. / SP Trader Fund
Sparkasse Dortmund
Spree Finanz AG
Spree-Capital GmbH
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
31
Star Invest
Stebo GmbH
Steinberg Investment Research AG
Steinberg Investments Ltd.
Stephens Capital Markets Limited
Sterling Asset Management AG
STIFX (stifxonline.com)
Stifxonline.com
Stonehard Consulting d.o.o.
Stratton & Partner
Stratton Wainwright
Suisse Banking
Suisse Life Securities
Sunset Handelsgesellschaft Unternehmergesellschaft
SVK Marketing GmbH
SVM24Direkt
SWAG – Schweizerische Wertpapierabrechnungsgesellschaft AG
SWD Sächsischer Wirtschaftsdienst
Swiss Agricole Asset Management
Swiss Basis GmbH
Swiss Bellair Bank
Swiss Credit Trust AG
SWISS DIVISION
Swiss Finance Conceptions & Marketing AG
SWISS Finance Consult
Swiss Finance Consult AG
Swiss Finance Consult AG
Swiss Finance Research AG
Swiss Key Equity Consult AG
Swiss Lotto – Gesellschaft Schweizer Zahlenlotto
Swiss Lotto Agency
Swiss Lotto Highstakes
Swiss Marketing GmbH
Swiss Siam Investment Club
Swiss Trading
Swiss World Cyber Lottery International – Swiss Lottery
Swiss-American Capital Management Institute,Inc.
SwissAudit Aktiengesellschaft
SwissKap AG
Swisskontor GmbH
Swissridge International Corp.
Switzerland Investment Group
Süddeutsche Stabak AG
Süddeutsche Stabak Aktiengesellschaft AG
Südwestbank AG
System Vorsorge Kapitalvermittlung (SVK)
Schmuck
Simon
Schlag
Sonntag
Schellscheidt
Schildbach
Schmidt
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
32
Surowiec
 Tzolov
Tannenbaum
Thomson
Tucholke
Traxel
Teller
Trisl
TOBER
Tausch
Trice
Thimm
Turgut
Tank
T.K. Immobilien GmbH
Taipan
Talis Enterprise GmbH
Task Force Service GmbH
Taurus GmbH
TBC-Marketing AG
Telba GmbH
Tele Inside s.r.o.
Tellba GMBH
The Crown Group CH
The Vale Group / Vale Group InvestmentsVale Group Asset Management /
Thomas Moore
Titan
Titan Trading Group
TiViBo GmbH
Tortola Capital
Trade Direct GmbH
Transatlantic Business & Management Ltd.
TRC Telemedia e.K.
Treberhilfe Berlin gGmbH
Treff Hotel Beteiligung
Trend Capital AG
Treu-Control Wirtschaftsberatungs- und Treuhandgesellschaft mbH
Treulux AG
Tri-Hub International
Triagon Holding AG
Trias Erste KG
Trias Zweite KG
Trikom Consulting GmbH
Trinity Ventures
TSI Consulting
TSI-Consulting
Turner Mayfield Advisory A.G.
TVI Express
Two For 1 Sportsbook
TXL Business Academy GmbH
TXL Capital Management GmbH
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
33
Tang
Täubert
 Ullmann
Uhlendorff
UBS Deutschland AG
UFB VERMITTLUNGSGESELLSCHAFT MBH
UFP
UGV Inkasso
Ulrich Engler Daytrading
Ulrich Petry
ULRICH VERLAG KG
ULRICH- VERLAG KG
Unabhängige Wirtschaftskanzlei Wolfgang Gelbke
Unia Holding AG
Unia Industrie Holding AG
Unispar Banque PLC
United Invest Management Deutschland Ltd & Co. KG
United Investors
United Markets (Asia) Limited
United Network Industries (Uni AG)
United Re-Insurance Group
United Trust Bank Plc.
United Trust of Switzerland S.A
United Trust of Switzerland S.A.
Unitymedia Hessen GmbH & Co KG
Universal Settlements International (USI) Inc.
Univest Limited
Univesta
Univesta Björk Immobilien und Anlage GmbH & Co.
Unternehmensgruppe Esdinero
UOT Financial Services Limited
US GOLD INTERNATIONAL LTD.
US Securities Agency (USSA)
Usecom Software AG
 Volkmann
Völl
Vitor
Voß
van Dien
van Dyken
Voll
von Eugen
Varin
Varin
Vejpustek
Volk
Vogel
von Krauthahn
V-O-B Handelsgesellschaft mbH
V/F Operation Leasing GmbH
VABA AG
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
34
ValueMaker
VALUTA VERMÖGENSVERWALTUNG GMBH
VanFunds / Vandior Inc.
Vanilla
VCI
Ventana Biotech Inc.
Ventono Capital GmbH
Venture Associates
Verbraucherdienst.e.V
Verimount FZE
Versicherungsdienst
Vertex Commodities
Verum Placement Ltd.
Vierte Juragent GmbH & Co. Prozesskostenfonds KG
VIT EnvironmentSystems AG
Vitascanning AG
Viva Tenerife Services
Volkssolidarität Sozial-Immobilien GmbH
Volkssolidarität Sozialimmobilienfonds GmbH & Co. KG
 Wood
Wächter
Wintzler
Willer
Wiedenbauer
Walkemeyer
Weimer
Walkemeyer
Wolter
Wolter
Wagner
W.
Wagner
Wolfram
Wolfram
Werner Dr.
Wagner
Wulff
Wagner
Weislogel
Walker
Wagner
WABAG – Wirtschaftsanalyse und Beratung AG
Wagner Finanzvermittlung GmbH
Wahl + Partner GmbH
Warrick Management Group Ltd.
Waterman Associates
WBwso Ltd
Wconstrukt
Wealth and Asset Planning
Webtains GmbH
Weizman Associates
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
35
Weizman Associates LLC
Wellshire Securities GmbH
West Atlantic Credit Group
WESTGATE Financial AG
Westminster Financial Management Ltd
Weyhill Establishments
WFB sro
White Birds Germany GmbH
Whitherspoon, Seymour & Robinson Corp.
Who is Who Prominentenenzyklopädie AG
WIBAG Immobilien und Beteiligung Aktiengesellschaft
Wicon Wirtschafts- und Finanzkontor Betz & Kronacher Beteiligungsgesellschaft
WIETEC-Germany
WIG – Wirtschaftszentrale für Industrie und Gewerbe AG
WIHH – Wirtschaftsinstitut für Industrie, Handel, Handwerk AG
WILL GMBH FINANZBERATUNG & VERWALTUNG
William Smith Partners
Wilton Investment Group
WiRe AG
Wirtschafts- und Finanzberatung Lindow-Giebel
Wirtschaftskanzlei Jilg GmbH
Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft Contor GmbH
WNB Finanzanlagen AG
Wohnbaufinanz
Wohnungsbaugesellschaft Leipzig West AG
Wohnungsbaugesellschaft Leipzig-West AG
Wonsei AG
Woodbridge Business Corp.
World Capital Group
World Capital Holding Corporation
WORLD MEDIA FONDS
World Telecom Data
WorldClearing Holding Inc.
Worldexchange
WorldFX-club
WSR – Whitherspoon, Seymour & Robinson Corporation
Würzburger Aktiengesellschaft für Vermögensbeteiligungen und Verwaltung (WAG)
 X Com Ltd.
Ximex Executive Ltd
XYZ NOMINEES LTD
 Y2M Media Limited
YESILADA BANK LTD.
Young Media Spain S.L.
Yuca Park
 Ziedd
Zeitler
Zürbis
Zimmermann
GoMoPa-Warnliste 09-2010
Zimmermann
Zürbis
Zietlow
Zürbis
Zollweg
Zürbis
Zensen-Döring
Z.E.N.I.T. AG
ZAK Inkasso
Zapf Creation
ZBI Zentral Boden Immobilien AG
ZDR-Datenregister GmbH
ZeBo GmbH
ZECH & ZECH VERMÖGENSVERWALTUNG GMBH
Zeder Immobilien Treuhand AG
ZEDER INVESTMENT AG
Zenith Commodities Ltd
ZENKER WOHNBAU AG
Zentrum für Wirtschaftspraxis
Zinnwald Financiers
Zucomex The Zurich Commodities Exchange
Zurich Capital Gruppe
Zurich Direct

Opfer in 2011:

– Angela Merkel

– Wolfgang Schäuble

– Accessio AG

– Allianz Global Investors

– Antek International

– Andreas Decker

– Anna Schwertner

– Bank of America

– Barclays

– Bernd Müller

– Bernd Pulch

– Beluga

– Bliznet Group Inc.

– Centrum Immobilien

– Citigroup

– Coldwell Banker

– Commerzbank

– CPA Capital Partners

– Credit Suisse

– CSA

– CWI

– Debiselect

– D.E.U.S.eG – Jürgen Oswald

– Deutsche Bank

– Deutsche Anstalt für Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht

– DKB Bank

– Dr. Paul Jensen

– Ekrem Redzepagic

– Erste Mai GmbH

– Express Kurier Europa

– Financial Services Regulatory Authority of Frankfurt

– FRONTAL 21

– Garbe

– General Global Media

– Genfer Kreditanstalt

– HCI

– HSBC

– HypoLeasing

– Indara

– JPMorgan Chase

– Kreis Sparkasse Tübingen

– Leipziger Bauträger (etliche Firmen, hier subsummiert)

– Lloyds Bank

– Lothar Berresheim

– Martina Oeder

– Martin Sachs

– Meridian Capital

– Money Pay

– Norinchukin Bank

– Oak Tree

– Prime Estate

– Prosperia Mephisto 1 GmbH & Co KG

– Raiffeisen- und Volksbanken

– Rothmann & Cie.

– Stefan Schramm

– Teldafax

– TipTalk.com

– Wirecard

Natürlich alles OHNE IRGENDEINEN BEWEIS VON VORBESTRAFTEN SERIENBETRÜGERN AUF EINER HOMEPAGE MIT KEINER ECHTEN PERSON IM IMPRESSUM STATTDESSEN MIT EINER NEW YORKER BRIEFKASTENADRESSE IM AUFTRAG MUTMASSLICH VON RA JOCHEN RESCH UND RA MANFRED RESCH, PETER EHLERS UND GERD BENNEWIRTZ -UND UNTER MITARBEIT VON GOOGLE, DEUTSCHLAND,

ALS “FRONTMANN” VON “GOMOPA” AGIERT DER DUTZENDWEISE VORBESTRAFTE KLAUS MAURISCHAT UNTER ANDEREM WEGEN BETRUGES AN SEINEM EIGENEN ANLEGER

Das Urteil gegen„GoMoPa“-Maurischat: Betrug am eigenen Anleger wg € 10.000,-

110401 6 GoMoPa SJB Opferlisteh
Die Verurteilung von Klaus Maurischat und Mark Vornkahl wegen Betruges am eigenen Anleger Klaus Maurischat und Mark Vornkahl, Betreiber vonwww.gomopa.net: Am 24. April 2006 war die Verhandlung am Amtsgericht Krefeld in der Betrugssache: Mark Vornkahl / Klaus Maurischat ./. Dehnfeld. Aktenzeichen: 28 Ls 85/05 Klaus MaurischatLange Straße 3827313 Dörverden.Das in diesem Verfahren ausschließlich diese Betrugsache verhandelt wurde, ist das Urteil gegen Klaus Maurischat recht mäßig ausgefallen.Zusammenfassung der Verhandlung vom 24.04.2006 vor dem Schöffengericht des AG Krefeld in der Sache gegen Klaus Maurischat und Mark Vornkahl.Zur Hauptverhandlung erschienen:Richter Dr. Meister, 2 Schöffen,Staatsanwalt, Angeklagter Klaus Maurischat, vertr. durch RA Meier, Berlin; aus der U-Haft zur Verhandlung überführt.1. Eine Gerichtsvollzieherin stellt unter Ausschuss der Öffentlichkeit eine Urkunde an den Angeklagten Maurischat zu.2. Bei Mark Vornkahl wurde im Gerichtssaal eineTaschenpfändung vorgenommen.Beginn der HauptverhandlungDie Beklagten verzichten auf eine Einlassung zu Beginn.Nach Befragung des Zeugen Denfeld zum Sachverhalt wurde dieVerhandlung auf Wunsch der Staatsanwaltschaft und den Verteidigern unterbrochen.Der Angeklagte Maurischat gab nach Fortsetzung derHauptverhandlung Folgendes zu Protokoll:Er sähe ein, dass das Geld auf das falsche Konto gegangen sei und nicht dem eigentlichen Verwendungszweck zugeführt wurde. Das Geld sei aber zurückgezahlt worden und er distanziere sich ausdrücklich von einem Betrug.Schließung der BeweisaufnahmeDer Staatsanwalt verließt sein PlädoyerEr halte am Vorwurf des Betruges fest. Mit Hinweis auf die einschlägigen Vorstrafen des Angekl. Maurischatund auf laufende Ermittlungsverfahren, beantrage er ein Strafmaß von 1 Jahr und 6 Monaten.Er halte dem Angeklagten zu Gute, dass dieserWiedergutmachung geleistet habe, und dass dieser geständig war. Zudem läge die letzte Verurteilung wegen Betruges 11 Jahre zurück. Auch sei der Geschädigte nicht in existentielle Not geraten, wobei der Staatsanwalt nicht über noch laufende Verfahren hinweg sehen könne. Er läge aber dem Angeklagten Maurischat nahe, keine weiteren Aktivitäten im Bezirk der Staatsanwaltschaft Krefeld auszuüben, insbesondere möchte er, dass keine weiteren Anleger im Bezirk der Staatsanwaltschaft Krefeld durch GoMoPa akquiriert werden.Die Freiheitsstrafe soll zur Bewährung ausgesetzt werden.Plädoyer des Verteidigers des Angekl. Maurischat, Herrn RA MeierEr schließe sich, wie (in der Unterbrechung) vereinbart, dem Staatsanwalt an.Es stimme, dass sein Mandant Fehler in seiner Vergangenheit gemacht habe, und dass er auch diesmal einen Fehler begangen haben könnte, jedoch sei der Hinweis wichtig, dass sein Mandant aus diesen Fehlern gelernt habe.Der Angeklagte haben das letzte Wort.Maurischat sagt, es sei bereits alles gesagt worden.Unterbrechung zu Hauptverhandlung. Der Richter zieht sich mit den Schöffen zur Beratung zurück.Urteilsverkündung:Der Angeklagte wird des gemeinschaftlichen Betrugs für schuldig befunden.Der Angeklagte Klaus Maurischat wird zu einerFreiheitsstrafe von 1 Jahr und 6 Monaten verurteilt. Diese wird zur Bewährung ausgesetzt.Die Bewährungszeit wird auf 3 Jahre festgesetzt.Der Haftbefehl gegen Klaus Maurischat wird aufgehoben.Der Angeklagte trage die Kosten des Verfahrens.UrteilsbegründungDer Richter erklärt, dass eine Täuschung des Geschädigtenvorliegt und somit keine Untreue in Betracht kommen kann.Die Fragen, ob es sich um einen Anlagebetrug handele sei irrelevant. Er hält den Angeklagten die geleistete Wiedergutmachung zu Gute.Ebenso ist das Geständnis für die Angeklagten zu werten. Zudem liegt die letzte Verurteilung des Angeklagten Maurischat 11 Jahre zurück.Die Parteien verzichten auf Rechtsmittel. Das Urteil ist somit rechtskräftig.Mit dem heutigen Urteil endet ein Kapitel in derBetrugssache Goldman Morgenstern & Partners, Klaus Maurischat und Mark Vornkahl.Alle GoMoPa.net Verantwortlichen, Maurischat, Vornkahl und Henneberg sind nun vorbestrafte Abzocker und Betrüger und die Zukunft der Pseudoklitsche GoMoPa.net sieht duster aus.Mir dem Geständnis der beiden ABZOCKER MAURISCHAT UND VORNKAHL vor Gericht bricht ein jahrelangaufrechterhaltenes Lügengeflecht von einigen primitiven Betrügern zusammen. Gewohnheitsverbrecher und Denunzianten,die rechtschaffene Personen und Firmen in ihren Verbrecherforen kriminalisierten.

Wie “GoMoPa”-“CEO” Maurischat meine Familie und mich mit Mord, Totschlag und Vergewaltigung bedrohte

Ich hau dir auf die Fresse, du Sau!
From: “vertrieb@gomopa.net
Date: Wed, January 19, 2011 4:11 pm
To: office@ebizz.tv
Priority: wir werden Ihnen bald deinen alten faltenarsch aufreissen und deiner XXX vor deinen augen in den arsch ficken, du stinkendes und verlogenes St?ck Mist. War die XXX schon da, du altes widerliches St?ck Dreck?Wir haben ihn wegen Verleumdung und anderer schwerwiegender Delikte angezeigt.
Das Handelsblatt schreibt über Maurischat undGoMopa: „Die Bundesanstalt für
Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht BaFin hat aufgrund der merkwürdigen
Kursturbulenzen der Wirecard -Aktie eine förmliche Untersuchung des Falles
eingeleitet. BaFin prüft mögliche Marktmanipulationen nach Falschbericht desInternetdienstes Gomopa. Zwei der Gomopa-Gründer wurden schon 2006 wegen Betrugs
verurteilt…
Mark Vornkahl, einer der Gründer von Gomopa wies den Vorwurf der
Kursmanipulation gestern zurück. Man wolle nur die Wahrheit aufdecken. Es ist
allerdings nicht das erste Mal, dass Gomopa-Vertreter ins Zwielicht geraten.
2006 wurden Vornkahl und Mitgründer Klaus Maurischat wegen Betrugs an einem
Anleger verurteilt. Maurischat gab gestern gegenüber dem Handelsblatt weitere
Verurteilungen zu. Es habe sich dabei jedoch nicht um Anlagebetrug gehandelt.
;siehe Beweis:

http://www.handelsblatt.com/finanzen/boerse-inside/marktgeruechte-finanzaufsicht-untersucht-kursachterbahn-bei-wirecard;2557254

und die Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung (FAZ) schreibt über Maurischat und
GoMoPa.
“Nach Informationen der F.A.Z. sollen unter anderem gezielt über den
Finanznachrichtendienst Gomopa im Internet Gerüchte über Pennystocks gestreut
worden sein. Gomopa steht für Goldman Morgenstern &amp; Partners Consulting LLC. Auf
ihrer Internetseite hat Gomopa „Transparenz in Sachen Finanzen, Vorsorge und
Geldanlage“ versprochen, doch ihr Chef Klaus Maurischat saß als mutmaßlicher
Betrüger schon in Untersuchungshaft.

Seit einigen Tagen ist die Internetseite www.gomopa.net offline, und es

kursieren Gerüchte über finanzielle Unregelmäßigkeiten. Immer wieder ist Gomopa
in juristische Streitigkeiten verwickelt. In einer einstweiligen Verfügung des
Landgerichts Berlin vom 31. August (Az.: 27 O 658/10) ist das Unternehmen
aufgefordert worden, nicht länger Falschinformationen über den Kasseler
Immobilienhändler Immovation AG und seinen Finanzvorstand Lars Bergmann zu
verbreiten. „Gomopa hat seinen Firmensitz bewusst in New York, weil die Firma
dort presserechtlich nicht belangt werden kann“, sagte ein Kenner des
Unternehmens der F.A.Z.”

&nbsp;siehe Beweis:

http://www.faz.net/s/RubEC1ACFE1EE274C81BCD3621EF555C83C/Doc~EB5651ECDC72949FF907D2CA89D5AFE72~ATpl~Ecommon~Scontent.html

Klaus Maurischt wurde wegen dem Kapitalanlagebetrug an seinem eigenen
&quot;GoMoPa&quot;-Anleger rechtskräftig als Betrüger verurteilt:
siehe Beweis:

http://www.immobilien-vertraulich.com/law/7273-der-beweis-betrugs-urteil-gegengomopa-maurischat-betrug-am-eigenen-anleger-wg–10000-.html

weitere Informationen zu Maurischat und seinen mutmasslichen Komplizen
Gerd-Wilhelm Bennewirtz, Peter Ehlers, Volker Schmidt-Jennrich etc.. finden Sie
in der Presselounge der SJB-Opfer.
&nbsp;siehe Beweise:

http://sjb-fonds-opfer.com/?page_id=11764

Der mehrfach vorbestrafte Serienbetrüger Klaus Maurischat („GoMoPa“) hat ein
eigenes Portal nur für Kinder und deren „Sexualerziehung“. Dies haben der
Informationsdienst Tip-Talk und die Anleger-Opfer von http://www.sjb-fonds-opfer.com
enthüllt: http://www.gomopa4kids.net.
Hier werden User von dem mehrfach vorbestraften Betrüger (AZ: 28 Ls 85/05)
darüber aufgeklärt, was es mit der „Selbstbefriedigung“ und anderen
Sexualpraktiken angeblich auf sich hat: „Wahr oder falsch: Gerüchte über
Selbstbefriedigung! „
TipTalk kommentiert: „Wenn Sie Ihre Kinder nicht selbst aufklären können oder
wollen, sollten Sie das getrost Gomopa überlassen.

Über Selbstbefriedigung erzählt man sich immer noch verrückte Geschichten. Wir
sagen dir was stimmt und was voll
gelogen ist!
http://www.gomopa4kids.net kümmert sich gern um Ihren Nachwuchs.

http://www.gomopa4kids.net/Forum/liebe-sex-und-beziehungen/wahr-oder-falsch-geruechte-ueber-selbstbefriedigung-

p232.html#post232.“ (Inzwischen gelöscht)
siehe Beweis unter

http://sjb-fonds-opfer.com/?p=11490

Unsere Presseanfrage zu dem heiklen Thema beantworte der vorbestrafte Betrüger
erst gar nicht, sondern schickte einen Herren „Siegfried Siewert“ vor, der
versuchte mit Droh-Telefonaten und Droh-E-Mails bei uns und unseren Informanten

das Erscheinen der brisanten Informationen zu verhindern.

Siehe Beweise unter

http://sjb-fonds-opfer.com/?p=11616

und

http://sjb-fonds-opfer.com/?p=11490

Pikant dabei: „Siegfied Siewert“ ist wie viele „GoMoPa“-Kenner wissen, ein
selbstgewähltes Pseudonym für Klaus Maurischat.
Und: Die „GoMoPa“-Kinder-Webseite wird genau da gehostet, wo auch Maurischats
GoMoPa-Webpage sowie zahlreiche ihm zugerechnete Cyberstalking-Erpresserseiten
gehostet werden (siehe die Verbindungsdaten im nachfolgenden Text).
Erstaunlich ist auch, das Maurischat seinen zahlreichen Cyberstalking-Opfern
immer wieder Sexualdelikte mit Kindern vorgeworfen hat – an diesen anoynmen
Vorwürfen war natürlich in keinem Fall irgendetwas wahr.

Normal

Die gesamte deutsche Presse verabscheut die erfundene STASI-“GoMoPa” zutiefst

Presseberichterstatung-zu-Maurischat1

Börse Online über die frei erfundenen “Goldman, Morgenstern u. Partner” alias “GoMoPa” und Resch

Gomopa

Anwälte als Finanzierungsquelle

Von Renate Daum

Der Anlegeranwalt Jochen Resch kommt neuerdings oft in den Pressemitteilungen vor, die der Finanzdienst Gomopa ungefragt an Redaktionen verschickt. Als „Deutschlands bekannteste Anlegerschutzkanzlei“ wird Resch Rechtsanwälte in einem Bericht über das Ende der Noa Bank vorgestellt. Zu Schrottimmobilien äußert sich Resch, zu einem Skandal um den Immobilienfondsanbieter Volkssolidarität. Die Offenheit ist neu. Früher ging Gomopa Resch hart an und konfrontierte ihn mit Vorwürfen. Doch einige Formulierungen in einer Teilhaberinformation zur finanziellen Situation Gomopas vom Juli 2010 legen nahe, dass der Sinneswandel vielleicht nicht nur Zufall ist.

Gomopa, eigentlich Goldman Morgenstern & Partners Consulting LLC mit Sitz in New York, ist seit mehr als zehn Jahren aktiv. Auf der Website ist unter den Fachautoren der bekannte Bestsellerautor Jürgen Roth aufgelistet. Im Handelsregister der deutschen Zweigniederlassung ist als Geschäftszweck an erster Stelle „wirtschaftliche Beratung, insbesondere des Mittelstandes“ aufgelistet. Dazu gehöre „die Präsentation von Firmen im Internet und anderen Medien“. Die Verbindung des Dienstes mit einem Nachrichtenportal im Internet sieht Gomopa-Gründer Mark Vornkahl nicht als Problem: „Ein Interessenkonflikt zwischen kostenpflichtiger Beratung, Informationsabonnement und öffentlicher Aufklärung ist uns seit Bestehen nicht untergekommen.“

Anwalt Resch spricht von Rechercheauftrag

Doch die Nutzer des Portals erfuhren bislang nicht, ob mit Personen oder Organisationen, über die berichtet wurde, vertragliche Beziehungen bestehen. Reschs Kanzlei war laut Teilhaberinformation zeitweise eine wichtige Finanzierungsquelle von Gomopa. Darin berichtet Gomopa-Mitgründer Klaus Maurischat, dass eine Vereinbarung mit der Kanzlei „momentan 7500,- Euro im Monat einbringt – rund 25 Prozent unserer monatlichen Kosten!“. Für „individuelle Mandantenanwerbung“ stehe die Gesellschaft mit mehreren Anwaltskanzleien in Verhandlungen.Anwalt Resch stellt zum Inhalt der Vereinbarung klar: „Wir haben einen einmaligen Rechercheauftrag erteilt, der im üblichen Rahmen honoriert wird.“ Mit Mandantenbeschaffung habe das nichts zu tun. Was Gomopa von einer Mandantenanwerbung hätte, ist auch unklar. Denn Anwälte dürfen dafür nicht bezahlen. Auf unsere Anfrage zu dieser und weiteren Fragen gab Vornkahl keine inhaltliche Antwort beziehungsweise verwahrte sich gegen Zitate aus den entsprechenden Passagen seiner E-Mail, weil er einem Mitbewerber „keine Auskünfte zur Ausgestaltung unseres Geschäftsbetriebes gebe“. Das verblüfft, denn BÖRSE ONLINE betreibt das Anlegerschutzportal http://www.graumarktinfo.de, ist aber keine Unternehmensberatung. Gomopa betont dagegen, nichts mit Anlegerschutz zu tun zu haben.

Bauträgergesellschaft als wichtige Finanzquelle

Eine wichtige Finanzierungsquelle von Gomopa war laut der Teilhaberinformation auch eine Bauträgergesellschaft, gegen die Anwalt Resch im Auftrag von Anlegern vorgegangen war. Im Zusammenhang mit deren Muttergesellschaft Estavis war Gomopa sogar schon mit Nötigungsvorwürfen konfrontiert worden. Als ein umstrittener Anlegerschützer einen Vertrag des Immobilienkonzerns mit Gomopa in die Hände bekam, las er eine Erpressung hinein. Auf seine Anzeige hin nahm die Staatsanwaltschaft aber nicht einmal Ermittlungen auf. „Estavis wurde nicht erpresst“, stellt ein Sprecher der Immobilienfirma klar. Die Estavis-Tochter B&V schloss sogar einen neuen Beratungsvertrag ab und zahlte viermal 5000 Euro – in gegenseitigem Einvernehmen, wie der Estavis-Sprecher betont.

Jüngst kam nun der Wirtschaftsdetektiv Medard Fuchsgruber – Aushängeschild und Kooperationspartner von Gomopa – ins Gerede. Bevor das Bündnis besiegelt wurde, bekam er im Frühjahr 2010 einen Auftrag aus Kassel, wie die „Süddeutsche Zeitung“ berichtet. Der Wirtschaftsdetektiv sollte herausfinden, wer hinter üblen Angriffen und Erpressungsversuchen gegen Immovation stecke. In einem zweiten, davon unabhängigen Schritt sollte Fuchsgruber versuchen, böse Berichte und Kommentare bei Gomopa über das Immobilienhandelsunternehmen zu unterbinden. Insgesamt erhielt er dafür 67 500 Euro.

Glaubwürdigkeitsproblem bei Seriositätsüberprüfung

Kurz darauf, im Juni, gab Gomopa die Kooperation mit dem Detektiv bekannt. Der Finanzdienst publizierte zudem erneut Negatives. Die schockierten Immovation-Vorstände zeigten Fuchsgruber an. Der Detektiv weist alle Vorwürfe von sich. Mit Kundenverrat habe das im Übrigen gar nichts zu tun. Auch mit der Ausrichtung des Partners hat er keine Probleme. Gomopa gebe schließlich keine Empfehlungen und bewerte Produkte und Emittenten nicht. „Wäre das der Fall, wäre das nicht akzeptabel“, ergänzt er. Doch genau das hat Gomopa nun vor. Eine „Seriositätsüberprüfung“ plane Gomopa, berichtet Maurischat den Teilhabern. Das solle Emittenten 1499 Euro für eine Erstüberprüfung und dann 999 Euro pro Jahr kosten. Er rechnet dabei 500 Euro Provision ein, sodass für die Überprüfung ein dreistelliger Betrag übrig bliebe. Das wäre extrem wenig.Gomopa dürfte ohnehin ein Glaubwürdigkeitsproblem haben, denn der Dienst fiel mit falschen oder fragwürdigen Äußerungen auf. So gibt es laut Website 57 345 Mitglieder (Stand 21. September 2010). Die Mitgliedschaft ist bis auf einen einmonatigen Test kostenpflichtig. Einnahmen aus den Beiträgen beziffert Maurischat in seiner Information aber nur auf um die 5000 Euro. Selbst wenn alle Mitglieder die günstigste Variante gewählt haben, ergäben sich rechnerisch weit weniger als 1000 zahlende Mitglieder. Gomopa äußert sich dazu nicht.

Umzug soll Anwälten Arbeit erschweren

Und es gibt noch mehr Probleme: Ein Minister sei auf einen Vorstand von Immovation hereingefallen, hatte Gomopa berichtet. Eine Ente, deren Weiterverbreitung gerichtlich verboten wurde. Im Fall Wirecard hatte ein Bericht die Aktie abstürzen lassen. Hinterher stellte sich heraus, dass die zentrale Aussage falsch war.

Als „größtes Problem“ schildert Maurischat Teilhabern die „sprunghaft gestiegenen Kosten für juristische Beratung“, seit die Zweigniederlassung in Deutschland eröffnet worden sei. Dadurch sei es Anwälten gelungen, einstweilige Verfügungen und Ähnliches zuzustellen, mit denen Äußerungen untersagt würden. Eine Lösung dafür präsentiert Maurischat den Teilhabern auch gleich. Ein System zur Fehlervermeidung? Nein. Die Liquidierung der deutschen Zweigniederlassung. Es schwebe ihnen vor, den Sitz der Verwaltung von New York in die Schweiz zu verlagern und den Ort der Geschäftsentscheidung nach Spanien. Und das erschwere Rechtsanwälten die Arbeit, die gegen Gomopa vorgehen wollten.

Quelle: BÖRSE ONLINE 38/2010 vom 16.9.2010

Beweise: Meine Magister-Urkunde, die Strafanzeigen gegen “GoMoPa” u.a., Betrugsurteil gegen “GoMoPa” wg. Betruges am eigenen Anleger


Liebe Leser,

nachfolgendfolgende Beweise:

Meine Magister-Urkunde,

Beweis INVESTMENT Magazin aus dem Jahre 2000 (kann gerne bestellt werden)

die Strafanzeigen gegen “GoMoPa” u.a. als Aktenzeichen,

–  Kriminalpolizei Wiesbaden ( ST/0148943/2011),

– Kriminalpolizei Hamburg (2100 Js 1108 / 10)

– Kriminalpolizei Berlin (110228-0831-037199

Weitere Ermittlungen sind am Laufen.

Betrugsurteil gegen “GoMoPa” wg. Betruges am eigenen Anleger im Protokoll

DAS ORIGINAL – Über eine selbstgebaute Blogseite verbreiten die GoMoPa-Gangster eine gefälschte Stellung von Meridian Capital, um Verwirrung zu stiften. Diese Blogseite existiert erst seit Dezember 2010.
Beweis:

http://www.hypestat.com/pressreleaser.org

Die Meridian Capital-Seite, das Original,

http://othergomopa.blogspot.com/

ist dagegen bereits seit2009 online
Beweis: Aussage Meridian Capital – das Unternehmen können Sie auch gerne direkt kontaktieren.
und
KLAUS DIETER MAURISCHAT IN DETENTION
Source: http://klaus-dieter-maurischat.blogspot.com/2009/01/klaus-dieter-maurischat-in-haft.html
Hintergrund: Die Verurteilung von Klaus Maurischat und Mark Vornkahl wegen Betruges am eigenen Anleger

Klaus Maurischat und Mark Vornkahl, Betreiber vonwww.gomopa.net: Am 24. April 2006 war die Verhandlung am Amtsgericht Krefeld in der Betrugssache: Mark Vornkahl / Klaus Maurischat ./. Dehnfeld. Aktenzeichen: 28 Ls 85/05 Klaus MaurischatLange Straße 3827313 Dörverden.Das in diesem Verfahren ausschließlich diese Betrugsache verhandelt wurde, ist das Urteil gegen Klaus Maurischat recht mäßig ausgefallen.Zusammenfassung der Verhandlung vom 24.04.2006 vor dem Schöffengericht des AG Krefeld in der Sache gegen Klaus Maurischat und Mark Vornkahl.Zur Hauptverhandlung erschienen:Richter Dr. Meister, 2 Schöffen,Staatsanwalt, Angeklagter Klaus Maurischat, vertr. durch RA Meier, Berlin; aus der U-Haft zur Verhandlung überführt.1. Eine Gerichtsvollzieherin stellt unter Ausschuss der Öffentlichkeit eine Urkunde an den Angeklagten Maurischat zu.2. Bei Mark Vornkahl wurde im Gerichtssaal eineTaschenpfändung vorgenommen.Beginn der HauptverhandlungDie Beklagten verzichten auf eine Einlassung zu Beginn.Nach Befragung des Zeugen Denfeld zum Sachverhalt wurde dieVerhandlung auf Wunsch der Staatsanwaltschaft und den Verteidigern unterbrochen.Der Angeklagte Maurischat gab nach Fortsetzung derHauptverhandlung Folgendes zu Protokoll:Er sähe ein, dass das Geld auf das falsche Konto gegangen sei und nicht dem eigentlichen Verwendungszweck zugeführt wurde. Das Geld sei aber zurückgezahlt worden und er distanziere sich ausdrücklich von einem Betrug.Schließung der BeweisaufnahmeDer Staatsanwalt verließt sein PlädoyerEr halte am Vorwurf des Betruges fest. Mit Hinweis auf die einschlägigen Vorstrafen des Angekl. Maurischatund auf laufende Ermittlungsverfahren, beantrage er ein Strafmaß von 1 Jahr und 6 Monaten.Er halte dem Angeklagten zu Gute, dass dieserWiedergutmachung geleistet habe, und dass dieser geständig war. Zudem läge die letzte Verurteilung wegen Betruges 11 Jahre zurück. Auch sei der Geschädigte nicht in existentielle Not geraten, wobei der Staatsanwalt nicht über noch laufende Verfahren hinweg sehen könne. Er läge aber dem Angeklagten Maurischat nahe, keine weiteren Aktivitäten im Bezirk der Staatsanwaltschaft Krefeld auszuüben, insbesondere möchte er, dass keine weiteren Anleger im Bezirk der Staatsanwaltschaft Krefeld durch GoMoPa akquiriert werden.Die Freiheitsstrafe soll zur Bewährung ausgesetzt werden.Plädoyer des Verteidigers des Angekl. Maurischat, Herrn RA MeierEr schließe sich, wie (in der Unterbrechung) vereinbart, dem Staatsanwalt an.Es stimme, dass sein Mandant Fehler in seiner Vergangenheit gemacht habe, und dass er auch diesmal einen Fehler begangen haben könnte, jedoch sei der Hinweis wichtig, dass sein Mandant aus diesen Fehlern gelernt habe.Der Angeklagte haben das letzte Wort.Maurischat sagt, es sei bereits alles gesagt worden.Unterbrechung zu Hauptverhandlung. Der Richter zieht sich mit den Schöffen zur Beratung zurück.Urteilsverkündung:Der Angeklagte wird des gemeinschaftlichen Betrugs für schuldig befunden.Der Angeklagte Klaus Maurischat wird zu einerFreiheitsstrafe von 1 Jahr und 6 Monaten verurteilt. Diese wird zur Bewährung ausgesetzt.Die Bewährungszeit wird auf 3 Jahre festgesetzt.Der Haftbefehl gegen Klaus Maurischat wird aufgehoben.Der Angeklagte trage die Kosten des Verfahrens.UrteilsbegründungDer Richter erklärt, dass eine Täuschung des Geschädigtenvorliegt und somit keine Untreue in Betracht kommen kann.Die Fragen, ob es sich um einen Anlagebetrug handele sei irrelevant. Er hält den Angeklagten die geleistete Wiedergutmachung zu Gute.Ebenso ist das Geständnis für die Angeklagten zu werten. Zudem liegt die letzte Verurteilung des Angeklagten Maurischat 11 Jahre zurück.Die Parteien verzichten auf Rechtsmittel. Das Urteil ist somit rechtskräftig.

Protokoll: Durch Erpressung wollte Serienbetrüger Maurischat “GoMoPa”uns zwingen die Berichterstattung über den “NACHRICHTENDIENST” “GoMoPa” einzustellen

Unser Bildtext: Klaus Maurischat: There is no Place like home

So wollte der Serienbetrüger Klaus Maurischat uns zwingen die Berichterstattung über den “NACHRICHTENDIENST” “GoMoPa” einzustellen

Meine Anmerkung:  Sie lesen

den Original-Text mit den Original-Rechtschreibfehlern von Maurischat  in chronologischer Reihenfolge von unten nach oben. “Unter den Linden” ist die Regus-Tarnadresse für den untergetauchten Serienbetrüger und Stasi-Ganoven. “SUMA” steht im Sprach-Jargon des “GoMoPa”-”NACHRICHTENDIENSTLERS” für Suchmaschine.

Zitat:

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA (MEINE ANTWORT)

> Was anderes fällt einem Hilfsschüler auch nicht ein! Wenn ich dich
> schnappe, dann haue ich dir die Fresse ein – mein Lieber! Merk dir
> das gut, du Kinderficker!
>
> Was sagt denn dein Freund Dr. XXX  zu deinem handeln, Schwuchtel?
>
> > HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA (MEINE ANTWORT)
> >
> > > Geiles Google Suchergebniss hast du mittlerweile. Das ist sowas von
> > > geil. Am besten ist dieser Beitrag zu Deiner Magisterarbeit, du
> > > Spinner:
> > >
> > > http://scheisshausfliege.wordpress.com/2011/01/29/die-diplomarbeit-des-magisters-bernd-pulch-ein-haufen-scheisse/
> > >
> > > Wenn du nicht aufhörst, wird niemand mehr ein Stück Brot von dir
> > > nehmen. Dein Name ist dan absolut durch. Glaub mir, wir verstehen da
> > > mehr von als du Schwachkopf!
> > >
> > > Im Übrigen kannst du mich stets gern persönlich treffen. Unter den
> > > Linden 21, Berlin –  habe immer für dich Feigling Zeit! (TARN-ADRESSE)
> > >
> > > So – und nun überle wann du die Artikel über uns löschen willst,
> > > sonst mache ich die erste Seite der SUMA Ergebnisse mit deinen
> > > Einträgen voll.

Die deutsche Wirtschaftspresse über die erfundenen “Goldman, Morgenstern und Partner” alias “GoMoPa” – Vernichtende Urteile

Die deutsche Wirtschaftspresse über die erfundenen “Goldman, Morgenstern und Partner” alias “GoMoPa” – Vernichtende Urteile

Presseberichterstatung-zu-Maurischat1