KLICKEN SIE AUF DEN LINK ZUM DOWNLOAD DER ARTIKEL

Presseberichterstatung-zu-Maurischat1

THE QUARREL OVER THE STASI FILES
Martin Sabrow
The struggle for access to the Stasi files dates back to the peaceful revolution
in East Germany in the autumn of 1989. In November 1989, the
Ministry of State Security (MfS) was transformed into the Office of National
Security (Amt für Nationale Sicherheit, ANS), with the hidden
purpose of securing secret police structures and documents for the postdictatorial
era. This attempt failed, and the people responded with the
“storming of the Normannenstraße,” Mielke’s stronghold in Berlin, in
order to stop Stasi agents from destroying evidence. The storming was
successful; it represented a victory for the people and for civil rights.
In the end, the “Round Table” decided to destroy the files of Markus
Wolf’s intelligence branch, but the majority of the documents concerning
the internal activities of the MfS could be saved. In May 1990, the East
German People’s Chamber appointed a special committee under the
chairmanship of Joachim Gauck to control the dissolution of the MfS/
ANS. Then in September 1990, the German Unification Treaty obliged the
Bundestag to entrust MfS records to a Special Commissioner of the Federal
Government (later Federal Commissioner) for the files of the former
State Security Service, the so-called Gauck Agency, which began operations
with fifty-two employees. In December 1991, according to the same
provision of the Unification Treaty, the Bundestag approved the “Stasi
Records Law,” which granted the access to the records. The law was
passed by a broad coalition of CDU, FDP, and SPD deputies, with abstentions
from the PDS and the Green Party. Its famous Paragraph 32
regulates the unlimited access to “documents without personal information”
and to “copies of documents with personal information rendered
anonymous.” The other personal information that the Gauck Agency was
allowed and obliged to release can be divided into three categories: documents
with written consent of the person concerned, documents with
personal information about employees and beneficiaries of the MfS, and
“information about persons of contemporary history or holders of political
office, as far as they are not directly or indirectly affected persons.”
This curious, obscure definition distinguishes between guilty parties,
who were not supposed to benefit from the law, and three categories of
victims: “persons directly affected,” i.e., those deliberately targeted by the
MfS, “indirectly affected persons,” i.e., those mentioned secondarily in a
Stasi investigation, and finally a group with little claim to secrecy because
of their prominent public role—the people of contemporary history. In
46 INSTITUTIONS OF PUBLIC MEMORY
1996, the law was amended to insure that “the secrecy of mail, correspondence,
and telecommunications [would] be limited due to this act.”
In the ten years that followed, millions of applicants gained access to
the Stasi files through this law. The Gauck (now, Birthler) Agency today
has thousands of employees organizing the access to the Stasi files, which
are located in the central archives of the former MfS in Berlin and in
various regional archives. A special department (“Research and Education”)
pursues scholarly research, organizes conferences, and publishes
monographs; Mielke’s state security apparatus has thus become one of
the best investigated parts of the former dictatorship. The Stasi records,
encompassing more than 500,000 feet of documents, are in principle open
to all interested researchers. The public became used to the flood of
revelations that emerged from the reading of the Stasi files by former
victims and journalists; thousands of the Stasi’s “unofficial employees”
were exposed. The law proved to be one of the rare legacies of the East
German grassroots citizens movement that survived reunification—it
turned out to be a tremendous success.
But at the end of ten years, the very same law was widely criticized.
This unexpected situation arose when, through a series of legal moves,
former chancellor Helmut Kohl forced the Federal Commissioner to seal
all Stasi documents relating to him and his political role. The law underwent
a series of transformations that restricted the access to the Stasi
documents, thereby undermining the basis for public information about
the GDR. Henceforth, scholarship on the MfS and other facets of the
“second German dictatorship” could not reach the standard of former
investigations for lack of source material. How can this unexpected turn
be explained, especially since it occurred at the same time a general
interest in coming to terms with the past—from the Herero massacre to
the Holocaust—stood out as a phenomenon in Germany and elsewhere?
The first explanation is the political background to the quarrel. It
began at the end of 1999, just when the donation scandal of the CDU
rattled the political sphere like an earthquake. For weeks it threatened to
split the conservative party. The coincidence was no accident. In the slow
process of sifting unknown material in the files of the MfS, the Federal
Commissioner had come across protocols of “bug activity” and recordings
of telephone calls emanating from the inner circles of the West German
government in the 1970s and 1980s. This material seemed to contain
some evidence of the attitude of CDU leaders in the party donation case
and therefore drew unusual attention. Once it was made public, it led to
critical questions from journalists and from the Ministry of the Interior
under Otto Schily. These critics were concerned that the effort to come to
terms with the GDR legacy interfered with politics in the Federal Republic.
Gauck retreated a bit and made his position on the law and files more
THE QUARREL OVER THE STASI FILES 47
precise: the agency would no longer make public any original protocols
of the “illegally” bugged conversations but would still make the Stasi
summaries accessible. In April 2000, Kohl applied to inspect his personal
files. In November, he demanded that the agency withhold any material
that concerned him until he had personally reviewed it.
Personal factors also must have played an important role. No one
involved in the matter appeared open to compromise, and all acted with
remarkable stubbornness. For Gauck’s successor Marianne Birthler, the
situation was extremely difficult. As a newcomer, she had to prove she
was capable of replacing the hero Gauck and managing the crisis. The
quarrel enabled Kohl, who had lost political power and now risked tarnishing
his personal reputation, to distract public attention from the central
issues of the donation scandal. For his part, Otto Schily had the
opportunity to return to his roots as a state defense lawyer.
Birthler remained firm. She stated that the agency was obliged to
release requested material according to the law and that she could not
grant individuals the privilege of personally vetting these materials as
this would affect the access rights of historians and the media. As expected,
Kohl appealed to the Administrative Court on November 27 to
prevent any release of documents concerning him. Birthler, in return,
decreed that those concerned would be informed before “their” documents
were made accessible to allow them to object. But this half-hearted
move did not help. In July 2001, Kohl was handed a full victory in court;
his files had to be kept secret. The court ruled that “persons of contemporary
history” are also protected.
Days later, Otto Schily came forward with an unusual measure, the
“high noon ultimatum”: He would take legal action against the Federal
Commissioner if she continued to release documents to the public. When
an appeals court, the Federal Administrative Court, upheld the earlier
ruling that restricted personal information about Kohl and, consequently,
every concerned individual who had not been a Stasi member, Birthler
changed her tactics. She closed all exhibitions, all information and documentation
centers about the Stasi, shut down the agency’s web site, and
denied nearly all applications for historical research. Her actions elicited
a protest from the Simon Wiesenthal Center in Jerusalem, which accused
the authorities of blocking access to Nazi-related documents in the
MfS archive. The scholarly community also reacted with dismay when
Birthler stated in April 2002 that most of the 2,000 current requests for
research had to be postponed or refused in the wake of the Kohl decision.
In an article, Birthler explained that henceforth “historical research using
Stasi documents is possible only within narrow limits.”1 Experts criticized
the drastic and far-reaching restrictions on scholarly work, which
prompted the Bundestag to amend the law. In July 2002, the Bundestag
48 INSTITUTIONS OF PUBLIC MEMORY
approved the amendment with the SPD, Greens, and FDP voting against
the CDU.
In September 2003, the Berlin Administrative Court approved a petition
by the Birthler Agency to make the Kohl documents public, in
principle, without violating his constitutional rights. But even this seemingly
clear ruling was not the last word. Kohl lodged an appeal and, in
June 2004, the Federal Administrative Court reached a final compromise
on Stasi material relating to individuals of contemporary history. The
court ruled that no information concerning the private lives of these
persons could be made public. The court extended this limitation to all
tapes and verbatim protocols of illegal listening in private or official
rooms and—this was new—to all internal Stasi reports, analyses, and
interpretations based on such protocols; all information collected through
spying was restricted. Moreover, the court tightened limits on who could
apply to see the information: only scholars working on the history of the
Stasi could request information, and they had to insure that this information
would neither be published nor communicated to others. Personal
information could no longer be released for educational purposes or to
the media without the written consent of the person concerned.
It is difficult to decide who finally won the quarrel over the Stasi files,
Kohl or Birthler. Both declared victory. The court assigned one third of
the costs to Kohl and two thirds to Birthler. Newspaper editorials and the
German Journalists Union deplored the consequences for historians of
the GDR. Birthler declared that the ruling would undermine many scholarly
projects but would still allow for the release of most of the Kohl
papers. In order to decide the question of victory, we have to dig a little
bit deeper. The dynamics of the quarrel may be explained by the transformation
of an administrative conflict into a highly personal struggle
between Kohl and Birthler, but this obscures the broader cultural implications
of the conflict as an indicator of the state of affairs since reunification.
Taking a closer look, the original statute opened “access to the
records of the Ministry of State Security of the former GDR to the public
and to individuals in order to clarify and illuminate the practices of State
Security,”2 in other words, to delegitimize the SED dictatorship and to
educate the population. Here, the basic tension between a presumed
public interest and the sphere of individual rights, a conflict between the
demands of historical appraisal and the protection of personal data as
required by law, is already apparent. The customary declassification
waiting period of thirty years was not implemented for East German
archives, with the interesting exception of the documents of the GDR
Ministry of Foreign Affairs. The Stasi files were not considered part of the
“ordinary” political heritage which should belong to the public after the
THE QUARREL OVER THE STASI FILES 49
end of the ordinary time limit. Therefore, the use guidelines always followed
political rather than legal or archival considerations.
General restrictions had always existed regarding access to the documents
of supranational organizations, foreign countries, and files relating
to intelligence gathering, counter-intelligence, and terrorism. Additionally,
the original law for the Stasi files included the rights of affected
persons to demand the redaction of information that concerned them. For
the same reason, users were never granted access to any index or file card.
All along, it was only the Gauck/Birthler Agency that could retrieve,
classify, and present material—often in a revised version with names and
sequences blacked out due to the privacy exemption. The employees of
the Gauck/Birthler Agency enjoy unrestricted access. Although they are
pledged to secrecy and subject to the directives of the authorities, they
can nevertheless use their privileged knowledge of names and code
names for more precise research, even in non-classified documents. They
have a lead on sources and interpretations which cannot be entirely controlled
by the scholarly community.
All of these unique customs and guidelines point to the same basic
problem. In the case of Stasi files, two different cultural norms and value
systems meet. On the one hand, the broadly acknowledged principle of
historicization—a social consensus that “the truth will heal”—urges us to
uncover the Stasi files without distinction to help shed light on the past:
“Quod est in actis, est in mundo!” By contrast, our democratic and legal
culture recognizes the individual’s right to control the use of personal
data. In that respect, it is of decisive importance how any information to
be released was obtained. It goes without saying that the Stasi’s operations
would have been considered illegal in the West. Scarcely any Stasi
report could ever be admitted in a Western court of law because it does
not conform to the legal order of a constitutional state. Here, historicization
cannot be reconciled with the rule of law. To release documents
would, in a sense, prolong the dictatorship and revictimize those injured
by Stasi espionage, but to withhold the documents might be seen as
minimizing or protecting the dictatorship.3 That is why the former
agency chief Joachim Gauck angrily commented on the first ruling in the
Kohl case that the court had disregarded the rights of a formerly oppressed
people.4 Even after the final court decision, these issues persist; it
is still possible that an endless series of questionable compromises will
cause the Administrative Court to revisit them on a regular basis.
The Stasi documents law and the establishment of the Gauck Agency
bore a Janus face. The totalitarian heritage of a state based upon surveillance
was incorporated into the political culture of a liberal constitutional
state that functions according to the rule of law. The Stasi documents law
created an exceptional situation in the service of a moral purge and the
50 INSTITUTIONS OF PUBLIC MEMORY
education of the public. The millions of requests for access are proof that
the strategy succeeded and met with the approval of the vast majority of
East and West Germans after 1990.
Why, then, did this conflict emerge so late? Marianne Birthler was
quite right when she reminded the court that her “practice of releasing
documents was never objected to by the Bundestag, which receives the
annual report of the agency, nor by the federal government, which is
legally in charge of the agency.”5 During the transition period from
spring to autumn 1990, there was no awareness of the incompatibility of
a moral/psychological purge and the prevailing privacy laws; the Bundestag
nearly unanimously adopted the Stasi files law passed by the GDR
Volkskammer in 1990. As the unification process got underway, the
difference between formal and material justice quickly became visible.
Bärbel Bohley, one of the most famous voices of the civil rights movement
in East Germany, declared, “We hoped for justice, and what we got was
the law.” Some employees of the Gauck Agency tried to use their privileged
knowledge politically, attempting, for instance, to shoot down the
last GDR prime minister Lothar de Maizière by denouncing him as Stasi
informer “IM Cerny.” But such attempts remained exceptions, and it took
years for this conflict to embroil the entire Stasi file complex.
There are at least three reasons for the lag. First, the documents
mostly concerned East Germans, who were not primarily concerned with
the problem of protecting their personal rights but with uncovering their
treatment by the Stasi. Secondly, the groups of readers who were not
personally involved—scholars, journalists, employers—were interested
in open access to the files, whereas those groups with a great interest in
restricting access—Stasi employees and collaborators—had lost their legitimacy
in the public sphere and had little opportunity to articulate their
views. Thirdly, access to the Stasi files was perhaps the only truly revolutionary
act during the collapse of the SED regime. In contrast to the
peaceful demonstrations and demands for legal travel to other countries,
the storming of the Stasi offices and the seizure of the files was an act of
open revolt, justified only by the power of the people as a natural social
force which itself establishes the law. Thus, the files became a revolutionary
symbol, an historical act of civil courage that became a point of pride
for East Germans and a legacy for a new, unified Germany—that is, until
the files went from marking Eastern assimilation to Western values to
challenging Western integrity.
From this point of view, the ongoing debate over the Stasi files is a
late product of the “crisis of unification” which emerged in the mid-
1990s. It reflects an ongoing battle between historicization and individualization
as leading social values. The conflict refutes any naïve belief in
a fast and harmonious reunification of Germany and demonstrates that a
THE QUARREL OVER THE STASI FILES 51
democracy cannot easily absorb the legacy of a dictatorship. In my opinion,
however, when this diagnosis is compared with the scandalous way
postwar Germany treated the National Socialist past in the 1950s—either
with silence or a facile coming to terms—it offers more light than shadow,
even for historians, who suffer most from the new legal status of the
partly sealed Stasi files.
Notes
1 Marianne Birthler, “Stasi-Unterlagen für Forschung und Medien—zum Rechtsstreit um
den Aktenzugang und zur Novellierung des Stasi-Unterlagen-Gesetzes,” Der Archivar 55,
no. 4 (2002): 298.
2 Marianne Birthler, “Der Zugang zu den Unterlagen des Ministeriums für Staatssicherheit
der DDR für Forschung und Medien,” Deutschland Archiv 36 (2003): 376.
3 See Birthler’s arguments in Birthler, “Stasi-Unterlagen für Forschung und Medien,” 299.
4 See Constanze von Bullion, “’Dieses Urteil ist ein Schritt zurück’. Der frühere Behördenchef
Joachim Gauck zeigt sich enttäuscht, die meisten Politiker in Berlin aber sehen ihre
Auffassung bestätigt,” Süddeutsche Zeitung, March 9, 2002.
5 Ibid.
52 INSTITUTIONS OF PUBLIC MEMORY

http://www.victims-opfer.com/?p=12461

http://www.victims-opfer.com/?p=12656

http://www.victims-opfer.com/?p=27240

http://www.victims-opfer.com/?p=27242

DOWNLOAD ORIGINAL DOCUMENT HERE

brandjustiz8_E

DOWNLOAD ORIGINAL FILE HERE

hvasira6

LUTZ EIGENDORFS ZERSTÖRTES AUTO NACH DEM STASI MORD

DOWNLOAD ORIGINAL DOCUMENT HERE

hvasira5

DOWNLOAD ORIGINAL FILE HERE

hvasira5

DOWNLOAD ORIGINAL DOCUMENT HERE

hvasira4

DOWNLOAD ORIGINAL DOCUMET HERE

hvasira3

DOWNLOAD ORIGINAL FILE HERE

hvasira3

DOWNLOAD ORIGINAL DOUCMENT HERE

hvasira2

DOWNLOAD ORIGINAL DOCUMENT HERE

jugendliche_als_im

DOWNLOAD ORIGINAL DOCUMENT HERE

pdf_juristische_hochschule-1

DOWNLOAD ORIGINAL DOCUMENT BELOW

anordnung_uebergangsgeld_dez_1989

Hallo

klare Anzeichen neben der Verbindung zur STASI durch Resch und STASI-Oberst Stelzer , die einem Blinden auffallen müssen, dass “GoMoPa” ein Relikt der STASI ist:

– der Name ist eine STASI-typische Abkürzung, ein amerikanisches oder internationales Unternehmen würde “Goldman, Morgenstern & Partner” nie mit “GoMoPa” abkürzen, das ist ganz im Stil der STASI – Abkürzungen wie IM, HA, STASI, OV etc.

– in der Unterzeile steht “Nachrichtendienst” – na klarer geht es wohl kaum noch – nachrichtendienste sind CIA, BND, KGB, Mossad und eben STASI

Nachrichtenagenturen oder Nachrichtenmedien sind etwas anderes – das zeigt sich auch an der englischen Übersetzung “INTELLIGENCE” für die Tätigkeit der Geheimdienste, die STASI-“GoMoPa” in Anspruch nimmt – mit dem Zusatz “Financial” als ob eine betrugsverurteilung wegen Betruges am eigenen Anleger die geeiegnete Qualifikation der “GoMoPa”-STASI wäre.

– die Praktiken des Rufmordes, Mordes, der Spionage im Privatleben der Opfer, der Gewinnung von Informanten und IM und der Zersetzung

– die Kontrolle von Ausweisen durch “GoMoPa”

– die gefälschten Lebensläufe z.B. von “CEO” ” Klaus Maurischat”

– die dubiosen Biographien VOR 1989

– die Verwendung von Tarnnamen

– der Einsatz von russischen Hackern

– das Personal stamt aus Ostdeutschland, Berlin, Brandenburg und Sachsen-Anhalt

– der konspirativen Arbeitsweise – niemand hat je “Goldman” oder “Morgenstern” gesehen oder ein Meeting/Sitzung erlebt

– die Morddrohungen und unverhohlenen Drohungen der Vernichtung der bürgerlichen und wirtschaftlichen Existenz ihrer Gegner

– der Instrumenalisierung von IM im Justizapparat

– der Erpressung von Geschäftspartnern oder Firmen, die dies partout nicht sein wollen (z.B. durch eine Warnliste).

– der Verbindung zur PDS und “Neues Deutschland”, “Extremnews” dem Parteibuch” (Internetblog).

– der Tarnung durch die Vertretung angeblicher Verbraucherinteressen (früher waren es die Interessen der “Werktätigen”).

– der Rückzugsraum und die Bastion des Verbraucherschutzes von “GoMoPa”-Obergenosse Resch in der STASI-Hochburg Brandenburg.

– das manische Sammeln von Informationen über andere Personen (wie Bennewirtz es selber so schön beschreibt über sein eigenes Vorgehen).

– die Nutzung von Facebook und anderen Internet-Quellen für Dossiers.

– das Fehlen jedweder Hemmungen und Skrupeln

– der Name “SJB”

– die Gründung der “SJB” in 1989 als die STASI in den Westen ausströmte

– die Herkunft der “SJB”-Briefmarke “Sammlerstück” aus Klein-Machnow, Ex-DDR

– die Verbindung “GoMoPa” und SJB

– die Beschimpfung von Bundeskanzlerin Angela Merkel und Fianzminister Wolfgang Schäuble durch SJ-“GoMoPa”-Agent “Peter Ehlers, der sonst nie EINEN EIGENEN ARTIKEL  schrieb….ALS “HERAUSGEBER”  !!!!

etc pp

ES RIECHT NACH STASI

ES SIEHT AUS WIE STASI

ES SCHMECKT NACH STASI

ES IST STASI !

K.L-O

Bonn

QUELLE: http://www.victims-opfer.com

siehE

http://www.victims-opfer.com/?p=27146

DOWNLOAD ORIGINAL DOCUMENT HERE

anordnung_schliessung_abt_m_nov_1989

01

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

DOWNLOAD ORIGINAL FILE BELOW

anordnung_gera_aktenvernichtung_nov_1989

https://berndpulch.org/2012/02/16/das-betrugsurteil-gegen-die-falscher-der-stasi-gomopa-scheisshausfliegen-eigenbezeichnung/

DOWNLOAD THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT HERE

ministerratsbeschluss_ausreise_nov_1989

DOWNLOAD ORGINAL DOCUMENT HERE

waffenausgabe_eisenberg_okt_1989

https://berndpulch.org/meridian-capital-about-gomopa-stasi-falschungen-der-%E2%80%9Cgomopa%E2%80%9D/

DOWNLOAD ORIGINAL FILE HERE

internierungsplan_frankfurt_juli_1989

DOWNLOAD ORIGINAL FILE HERE

befehl_unterwanderung_berliner_politik_dez_1988

DOWNLOAD ORIGINAL FILE HERE

zersetzungs_richtlinie

DOWNLOAD ORIGINAL DOCUMENT HERE

gvs-mfs-o008-9-86_ht

DOWNLOAD ORIGINAL DOCUMENT BELOW

terroranleitung_mfs1-2

Staatssicherheit aufgelöst
oder:
das Operationsgebiet eingenommen?

„Nach langer Verzögerung der Antwort leugnet die Bundesregierung nun weitgehendst die skandalösen Vorgänge, die mir während meiner USA-Reise unmißverständlich berichtet wurden:
[…] daß die CIA derzeit mit tatkräftiger Unterstützung bundesdeutscher Dienste ehemalige Stasi-Offiziere unter Vertrag nimmt.”

Aus einer Presseerklärung der innenpolitischen Sprecherin von Bündnis 90 / Die Grünen vom 10.03.1992, Ingrid Köppe
Ergebnis einer bisher erst groben Analyse von Datenhinterlassenschaften

Manche Artikel basieren auf langen Geschichten. Bei anderen Artikeln ist es genau umgekehrt: Artikel verursachen lange Geschichten. Bei diesem Artikel ist die Geschichte evtl. in beide Richtungen gleich lang. Und zwar ziemlich.

Als die Deutsche Demokratische Republik (DDR) aufgelöst wurde, hat sie neben merkwürdigen Erinnerungen auch noch – so glaubte man – eine der am besten dokumentierten Aktenlage der zweitbesten “politischen Geheimpolizei” der Welt hinterlassen. Die Gauck-Behörde, offiziell “Die Bundesbeauftragte für die Unterlagen des Ministeriums für Staatssicherheit der ehemaligen Deutschen Demokratischen Republik” verwaltet immerhin etliche Tonnen Akten und macht sie den betroffenen – Tätern wie Opfern – mit gewissen datenschutzrechtlichen Einschränkungen zugänglich. Geschichtsaufarbeitung sollte möglich werden.

Die Bürger der ehemaligen DDR schienen erreicht zu haben was sie wollten: das Ministerium für Staatssicherheit (die “Stasi”) war aufgelöst, die DDR auch, ein paar leitende Funktionäre im Gefängnis und die DDR jetzt BRD. Und jetzt kommen wir zu den Schönheitsfehlern dieser Operation.

Bei der Auflösung des Ministeriums für Staatssicherheit wurden ja, wie das neudeutsch so schön heißt, “einige Arbeitskräfte auf den Markt freigesetzt.” Schon die Frage wie viele Mitarbeiter das Ministerium für Staatssicherheit denn hauptamtlich hatte, lässt sich leider nicht so einfach beantworten. Es gibt zwar einen Haufen Akten, und Personallisten, aber die Interpretationen dieses Materials gehen dann doch eher weit auseinander.

Nun war für die Bürger der ehemaligen DDR die Frage, wer denn nun früher für die Stasi gearbeitet hat oder nicht, schon eine Frage. Man wollte schließlich nicht mit den selben Genossen noch einmal die – vermeintlich neuen Staatsstrukturen aufbauen. Hilfreich war u.a. die “Liste der Hauptamtlichen Mitarbeiter des MfS” die seit den frühen 90´er Jahren durch Publikationen der DDR-Bürgerbewegung verbreitet wurde. Sie enthält rund 100.000 Mitarbeiter bzw. Datensätze (genau: 97.058 plus minus ein paar) und gilt – präzise galt – als authentisch. Auch die juristischen Auseinandersetzungen, die die Verbreiter dieser Liste bekamen (“Die Andere” Berlin wegen Abdruck, Neues Forum Halle wegen Auslegen und http://www.nierenspende.de wegen Verbreitung im Netz), sprachen zumindest dafür, daß die Liste echte Namen enthält.

Als die Bürgerbewegten die Daten in den frühen 90er Jahren mit dBase verarbeiten, waren die damals genutzten 386er eher an den Grenzen ihrer Belastung. Bei 100.000 Daten fielen komfortable Suchaktionen und Quervergleiche eher aus. Das ist zum Glück heute etwas anders.

Im Kontext eines Kongresses in der ehemaligen Parteischule der Sozialistischen Einheitspartei Deutschlands (SED) der ehemaligen DDR kam neulich mal jemand vorbei und erzählt merkwürdige Geschichten: das ungefähr die Hälfte der Stasi-Mitarbeiter kurz vor der sogenannten Wiedervereinigung unter den Tisch gefallen sei. Zunächst war ein etwas toleranter Umgang mit dem Fassungsvermögen der eigenen Hirnstrukturen gefordert: die Mauscheleien zwischen Ost- und Westdiensten, die der junge Mann skizzierte, waren zwar in sich schlüssig, entbehrten allerdings auch nicht einer gewissen Komplexität. Nachweise sollten folgen.

Ein Hinweis war, daß mit der erwähnten Mitarbeiterliste der hauptamtlichen Mitarbeiter etwas nicht stimmte; bestimmte Geburtstage würden in ihnen fehlen. Und damit fängt die Geschichte an, auch wenn dieser Artikel nur eine erste Auflistung von Merkwürdigkeiten liefern kann.

Die Mitarbeiterliste der hauptamtlichen Mitarbeiter ist im Netz verfügbar: mit dem Dateinamen ma_stasi.zip wird man z.B. fündig. Welche Version Ihr allerdings im Netz findet, die von welcher Dienststelle welchen Geheimdienstes modifiziert wurde, kann ich euch nicht sagen.
Als Orientierung kann http://cryptome.org/stasi-list.htm helfen.

Die Struktur dieser Datenbank bzw. Liste besteht aus:

• Personenkennzeichen (PKZ)

Die PKZ ist das Identifikationskennzeichen für DDR-Bürger. Sie setzt sich zusammen aus Geburtsdatum (TTMMJJ), Geschlechtskennzeichen ( 4 = m; 5 = w ), 4-stelliger Ursprungskennziffer (erste Anmeldung) und einer Prüfziffer. Der Algorithmus liegt vor. Die Datenbank der Ursprungskennziffer ist derzeit noch in der Erstellung (schlecht lesbare Papiervorlage). Die Papiere gibt es in Kürze. 

• Diensteinheitenschlüssel (AB;CD;EF)  

Der Diensteinheitenschlüssel besteht aus 3 Gruppen á zwei Ziffern, wird aber zusammengezogen interpretiert. Er gibt die Einheit des MFS an, bei dem der/diejenige gearbeitet hat. 

• Namensfeld (Name, Mittelname, Vorname) 

• Gehalt  

Die genaue Bedeutung des Gehaltsfeldes ist umstritten. Einige behaupten, es handele sich hier um das Jahresgehalt. Andere sagen, es sei das Gehalt seit Frühjahr 1989. Dritte sagen was ganz anderes. Klar ist:
Die Liste enthält Gehaltszahlen aus denen sich möglicherweise ein Hierarchiestatus interpretieren lässt. Das kann Information oder Desinformation sein. 

Häufigkeitsverteilungen von Geburtstagen in einer Liste von hauptamtlichen Mitarbeitern des MfS

Zunächst sind wir also dem Hinweis auf Unregelmäßigkeiten im Bezug auf die Geburtsdaten nachgegangen. In der Tat scheint es bei der Stasi gewisse geburtenschwache Tage gegeben zu haben; unabhängig vom Geburtsjahr der jeweiligen finden sich weder am 17.03., 17.04., 17.05., 17.06., 17.07., 17.08. irgendwelche Einträge. Am 17.02. finden sich zwar 2 Einträge, allerdings sind beide aus dem Jahrgang 1927. Bei allem Verständnis für historische Aufarbeitung handelt es sich hier offensichtlich um Rentner.

Alle anderen Geburtstage scheinen in der Datenbank sehr gleichmäßig verteilt zu sein. Bei einer groben Annahme (Sollwert) von 100.000 Einträgen, geteilt durch die Anzahl möglicher Geburtstage (365) wäre der mathematische Richtwert 273 Geburten pro Tag. In Unkenntnis etwaiger geburtenschwachen Tage bzw. Monate handelt es sich bei den vorliegenden Zahlen entweder um eine erstaunlich primitiv frisierte Datenbase oder um eine relativ mittelwertgenaue Geburtsanhäufung.

Diese beiden Indikatoren (fehlende 17. und Mittelwert-Genauigkeit) können insofern nur bedingt als Indizien für eine Datenmanipulation gewertet werden. Für beide sind “natürliche” Erklärungen dankbar. Im Bezug auf die fehlenden Geburten an den 17. kann es sich um einen – immerhin 10 Jahre nicht bemerkten – Datenverlust bei der Konvertierung von Datenträgern schlechter Qualität handeln. Ein entsprechender Hinweis auf mögliche Datenträgerschäden liegt aus den Kreisen der konvertierenden Bürgerbewegten vor, konnte allerdings bis Redaktionsschluss noch nicht verifiziert werden. Ob der Indikator der “gleichmäßigen” Verteilung (die Geburten pro Tag bewegen sich alle passgenau um den Mittelwert von 273) gewertet werden kann, kann ich mangels Hinweisen auf etwaige übliche ungleichmäßigen Verteilungen nicht feststellen.

Wesentlich aufschlussreicher und als deutlichster Hinweis kann da schon der Abgleich der vorhandenen Datensätze der hauptamtlichen Mitarbeiter mit dem Diensteinheitenschlüssel gelten. Von den 2286 insgesamt vorhandenen Abteilungen der Staatssicherheit wären beispielsweise 1349 ohne einen einzigen Mitarbeiter. Diese Unterbesetzung ist wohl selbst bei großzügiger Lesart unrealistisch.

Noch deutlicher wird die Manipulation der HA-Datenbank allerdings, wenn man sich die Diensteinheitenzuweisung im Detail anguckt. Als Beispiel für eine etwas detailliertere Analyse sei hier mal die Hauptabteilung III (Funkaufklärung) genommen. Unter dem “generellen” Diensteinheitenschlüssel 940300 finden sich immerhin insgesamt 2312 Mitarbeiter. In den jeweiligen Diensteinheiten finden sich allerdings keine Mitarbeiter. Eine grobe Hierarchie ließe sich zwar aus den Gehaltszahlungen ableiten, aber keine Zuweisung zu den Diensteinheiten.

Diese Strukturverschleierung tritt bei allen Hauptabteilungen auf, in den Bezirksverwaltungen des MfS hingegen ist sie vorhanden. Wenn die Strukturverschleierung in der Datenbank eine grundsätzlich vom MfS betriebene wäre, würde sie wohl kaum die Bezirksverwaltungen außen vor lassen. Als Beispiel hierfür sei willkürlich Leipzig gewählt.

Hier allerdings liegen die Unterabteilungen offen; lediglich auf der Ebene der Leiter fehlen die Hinweise. Und dann gibt es noch Mitarbeiter in Abteilungen, wo nur die Abteilungsschlüssel vorliegen, allerdings nichts über die Abteilungen selbst bekannt ist.

Als Zusammenfassung dieser ersten groben Analyse muss man wohl feststellen, daß aufgrund dieser deutlichen Indikatoren für eine Manipulation der Datenbestände auch die anderen Abteilungszuweisungen nicht wirklich als verlässliche Werte angenommen werden können. In Zusammenhang mit verschiedenen Hinweisen auf den Zeitraum, der der Staatssicherheit für eine Strukturverschleierung bzw. partielle Verlagerung von Personalbeständen in andere Organisationen (Wirtschaftsunternehmen, staatliche geführte Unternehmungen etc.) zur Verfügung stand, könnte man sich schon Sorgen machen. Wenn man dann noch die Hinweise auf die Übernahme des kompletten Personalbestands einzelner Abteilungen durch andere Dienste – z.B. amerikanische – hinzuzieht, kann man sich wahlweise in schlechter Laune oder Aufdeckung aktiver Strukturen üben.

Um eine gründlichere Analyse durchzuführen, gibt es zunächst verschiedene Gedankenspiele. Die meisten Forschungsanträge der Gauck-Behörde und verfügbare Literatur über die Aktivitäten des MfS betreffen beispielsweise eher thematische als strukturelle Belange. Eine systematische Strukturanalyse wäre also in den jeweiligen Bereichen ein möglicher Ansatz.

Weitere mögliche Herangehensweisen wären durch differenzierte Arbeitshypothesen denkbar. Wenn man beispielsweise die offensichtliche Datenmanipulation der Hauptamtlichen-Liste zusammen mit den Rentenansprüchen ehemaliger HA-ler in die These der gewinnträchtigen Einführung von Personen mit mehreren Identitäten umwandelt, gäbe dies Anlass zur Überprüfung gewisser Geburtstage. Viel Spaß am Gerät.

Andy Müller-Maguhn, andy@ccc.de

Wer noch Material beizusteuern hat, ist herzlich eingeladen, dies an die Redaktion Datenschleuder auf elektronischem ( ds@ccc.de) oder postalischem Wege (Postfach 640236, D-10048 Berlin) zu tun.

„Nach langer Verzögerung der Antwort leugnet die Bundesregierung nun weitgehendst die skandalösen Vorgänge, die mir während meiner USA-Reise unmißverständlich berichtet wurden:
[…] daß die CIA derzeit mit tatkräftiger Unterstützung bundesdeutscher Dienste ehemalige Stasi-Offiziere unter Vertrag nimmt.”

Aus einer Presseerklärung der innenpolitischen Sprecherin von Bündnis 90 / Die Grünen vom 10.03.1992, Ingrid Köppe
Ergebnis einer bisher erst groben Analyse von Datenhinterlassenschaften

Manche Artikel basieren auf langen Geschichten. Bei anderen Artikeln ist es genau umgekehrt: Artikel verursachen lange Geschichten. Bei diesem Artikel ist die Geschichte evtl. in beide Richtungen gleich lang. Und zwar ziemlich.

Als die Deutsche Demokratische Republik (DDR) aufgelöst wurde, hat sie neben merkwürdigen Erinnerungen auch noch – so glaubte man – eine der am besten dokumentierten Aktenlage der zweitbesten “politischen Geheimpolizei” der Welt hinterlassen. Die Gauck-Behörde, offiziell “Die Bundesbeauftragte für die Unterlagen des Ministeriums für Staatssicherheit der ehemaligen Deutschen Demokratischen Republik” verwaltet immerhin etliche Tonnen Akten und macht sie den betroffenen – Tätern wie Opfern – mit gewissen datenschutzrechtlichen Einschränkungen zugänglich. Geschichtsaufarbeitung sollte möglich werden.

Die Bürger der ehemaligen DDR schienen erreicht zu haben was sie wollten: das Ministerium für Staatssicherheit (die “Stasi”) war aufgelöst, die DDR auch, ein paar leitende Funktionäre im Gefängnis und die DDR jetzt BRD. Und jetzt kommen wir zu den Schönheitsfehlern dieser Operation.

Bei der Auflösung des Ministeriums für Staatssicherheit wurden ja, wie das neudeutsch so schön heißt, “einige Arbeitskräfte auf den Markt freigesetzt.” Schon die Frage wie viele Mitarbeiter das Ministerium für Staatssicherheit denn hauptamtlich hatte, lässt sich leider nicht so einfach beantworten. Es gibt zwar einen Haufen Akten, und Personallisten, aber die Interpretationen dieses Materials gehen dann doch eher weit auseinander.

Nun war für die Bürger der ehemaligen DDR die Frage, wer denn nun früher für die Stasi gearbeitet hat oder nicht, schon eine Frage. Man wollte schließlich nicht mit den selben Genossen noch einmal die – vermeintlich neuen Staatsstrukturen aufbauen. Hilfreich war u.a. die “Liste der Hauptamtlichen Mitarbeiter des MfS” die seit den frühen 90´er Jahren durch Publikationen der DDR-Bürgerbewegung verbreitet wurde. Sie enthält rund 100.000 Mitarbeiter bzw. Datensätze (genau: 97.058 plus minus ein paar) und gilt – präzise galt – als authentisch. Auch die juristischen Auseinandersetzungen, die die Verbreiter dieser Liste bekamen (“Die Andere” Berlin wegen Abdruck, Neues Forum Halle wegen Auslegen und http://www.nierenspende.de wegen Verbreitung im Netz), sprachen zumindest dafür, daß die Liste echte Namen enthält.

Als die Bürgerbewegten die Daten in den frühen 90er Jahren mit dBase verarbeiten, waren die damals genutzten 386er eher an den Grenzen ihrer Belastung. Bei 100.000 Daten fielen komfortable Suchaktionen und Quervergleiche eher aus. Das ist zum Glück heute etwas anders.

Im Kontext eines Kongresses in der ehemaligen Parteischule der Sozialistischen Einheitspartei Deutschlands (SED) der ehemaligen DDR kam neulich mal jemand vorbei und erzählt merkwürdige Geschichten: das ungefähr die Hälfte der Stasi-Mitarbeiter kurz vor der sogenannten Wiedervereinigung unter den Tisch gefallen sei. Zunächst war ein etwas toleranter Umgang mit dem Fassungsvermögen der eigenen Hirnstrukturen gefordert: die Mauscheleien zwischen Ost- und Westdiensten, die der junge Mann skizzierte, waren zwar in sich schlüssig, entbehrten allerdings auch nicht einer gewissen Komplexität. Nachweise sollten folgen.

Ein Hinweis war, daß mit der erwähnten Mitarbeiterliste der hauptamtlichen Mitarbeiter etwas nicht stimmte; bestimmte Geburtstage würden in ihnen fehlen. Und damit fängt die Geschichte an, auch wenn dieser Artikel nur eine erste Auflistung von Merkwürdigkeiten liefern kann.

Die Mitarbeiterliste der hauptamtlichen Mitarbeiter ist im Netz verfügbar: mit dem Dateinamen ma_stasi.zip wird man z.B. fündig. Welche Version Ihr allerdings im Netz findet, die von welcher Dienststelle welchen Geheimdienstes modifiziert wurde, kann ich euch nicht sagen.
Als Orientierung kann http://cryptome.org/stasi-list.htm helfen.

Die Struktur dieser Datenbank bzw. Liste besteht aus:

• Personenkennzeichen (PKZ)

Die PKZ ist das Identifikationskennzeichen für DDR-Bürger. Sie setzt sich zusammen aus Geburtsdatum (TTMMJJ), Geschlechtskennzeichen ( 4 = m; 5 = w ), 4-stelliger Ursprungskennziffer (erste Anmeldung) und einer Prüfziffer. Der Algorithmus liegt vor. Die Datenbank der Ursprungskennziffer ist derzeit noch in der Erstellung (schlecht lesbare Papiervorlage). Die Papiere gibt es in Kürze. 

• Diensteinheitenschlüssel (AB;CD;EF)  

Der Diensteinheitenschlüssel besteht aus 3 Gruppen á zwei Ziffern, wird aber zusammengezogen interpretiert. Er gibt die Einheit des MFS an, bei dem der/diejenige gearbeitet hat. 

• Namensfeld (Name, Mittelname, Vorname) 

• Gehalt  

Die genaue Bedeutung des Gehaltsfeldes ist umstritten. Einige behaupten, es handele sich hier um das Jahresgehalt. Andere sagen, es sei das Gehalt seit Frühjahr 1989. Dritte sagen was ganz anderes. Klar ist:
Die Liste enthält Gehaltszahlen aus denen sich möglicherweise ein Hierarchiestatus interpretieren lässt. Das kann Information oder Desinformation sein. 

Häufigkeitsverteilungen von Geburtstagen in einer Liste von hauptamtlichen Mitarbeitern des MfS

Zunächst sind wir also dem Hinweis auf Unregelmäßigkeiten im Bezug auf die Geburtsdaten nachgegangen. In der Tat scheint es bei der Stasi gewisse geburtenschwache Tage gegeben zu haben; unabhängig vom Geburtsjahr der jeweiligen finden sich weder am 17.03., 17.04., 17.05., 17.06., 17.07., 17.08. irgendwelche Einträge. Am 17.02. finden sich zwar 2 Einträge, allerdings sind beide aus dem Jahrgang 1927. Bei allem Verständnis für historische Aufarbeitung handelt es sich hier offensichtlich um Rentner.

Alle anderen Geburtstage scheinen in der Datenbank sehr gleichmäßig verteilt zu sein. Bei einer groben Annahme (Sollwert) von 100.000 Einträgen, geteilt durch die Anzahl möglicher Geburtstage (365) wäre der mathematische Richtwert 273 Geburten pro Tag. In Unkenntnis etwaiger geburtenschwachen Tage bzw. Monate handelt es sich bei den vorliegenden Zahlen entweder um eine erstaunlich primitiv frisierte Datenbase oder um eine relativ mittelwertgenaue Geburtsanhäufung.

Diese beiden Indikatoren (fehlende 17. und Mittelwert-Genauigkeit) können insofern nur bedingt als Indizien für eine Datenmanipulation gewertet werden. Für beide sind “natürliche” Erklärungen dankbar. Im Bezug auf die fehlenden Geburten an den 17. kann es sich um einen – immerhin 10 Jahre nicht bemerkten – Datenverlust bei der Konvertierung von Datenträgern schlechter Qualität handeln. Ein entsprechender Hinweis auf mögliche Datenträgerschäden liegt aus den Kreisen der konvertierenden Bürgerbewegten vor, konnte allerdings bis Redaktionsschluss noch nicht verifiziert werden. Ob der Indikator der “gleichmäßigen” Verteilung (die Geburten pro Tag bewegen sich alle passgenau um den Mittelwert von 273) gewertet werden kann, kann ich mangels Hinweisen auf etwaige übliche ungleichmäßigen Verteilungen nicht feststellen.

Wesentlich aufschlussreicher und als deutlichster Hinweis kann da schon der Abgleich der vorhandenen Datensätze der hauptamtlichen Mitarbeiter mit dem Diensteinheitenschlüssel gelten. Von den 2286 insgesamt vorhandenen Abteilungen der Staatssicherheit wären beispielsweise 1349 ohne einen einzigen Mitarbeiter. Diese Unterbesetzung ist wohl selbst bei großzügiger Lesart unrealistisch.

Noch deutlicher wird die Manipulation der HA-Datenbank allerdings, wenn man sich die Diensteinheitenzuweisung im Detail anguckt. Als Beispiel für eine etwas detailliertere Analyse sei hier mal die Hauptabteilung III (Funkaufklärung) genommen. Unter dem “generellen” Diensteinheitenschlüssel 940300 finden sich immerhin insgesamt 2312 Mitarbeiter. In den jeweiligen Diensteinheiten finden sich allerdings keine Mitarbeiter. Eine grobe Hierarchie ließe sich zwar aus den Gehaltszahlungen ableiten, aber keine Zuweisung zu den Diensteinheiten.

Diese Strukturverschleierung tritt bei allen Hauptabteilungen auf, in den Bezirksverwaltungen des MfS hingegen ist sie vorhanden. Wenn die Strukturverschleierung in der Datenbank eine grundsätzlich vom MfS betriebene wäre, würde sie wohl kaum die Bezirksverwaltungen außen vor lassen. Als Beispiel hierfür sei willkürlich Leipzig gewählt.

Hier allerdings liegen die Unterabteilungen offen; lediglich auf der Ebene der Leiter fehlen die Hinweise. Und dann gibt es noch Mitarbeiter in Abteilungen, wo nur die Abteilungsschlüssel vorliegen, allerdings nichts über die Abteilungen selbst bekannt ist.

Als Zusammenfassung dieser ersten groben Analyse muss man wohl feststellen, daß aufgrund dieser deutlichen Indikatoren für eine Manipulation der Datenbestände auch die anderen Abteilungszuweisungen nicht wirklich als verlässliche Werte angenommen werden können. In Zusammenhang mit verschiedenen Hinweisen auf den Zeitraum, der der Staatssicherheit für eine Strukturverschleierung bzw. partielle Verlagerung von Personalbeständen in andere Organisationen (Wirtschaftsunternehmen, staatliche geführte Unternehmungen etc.) zur Verfügung stand, könnte man sich schon Sorgen machen. Wenn man dann noch die Hinweise auf die Übernahme des kompletten Personalbestands einzelner Abteilungen durch andere Dienste – z.B. amerikanische – hinzuzieht, kann man sich wahlweise in schlechter Laune oder Aufdeckung aktiver Strukturen üben.

Um eine gründlichere Analyse durchzuführen, gibt es zunächst verschiedene Gedankenspiele. Die meisten Forschungsanträge der Gauck-Behörde und verfügbare Literatur über die Aktivitäten des MfS betreffen beispielsweise eher thematische als strukturelle Belange. Eine systematische Strukturanalyse wäre also in den jeweiligen Bereichen ein möglicher Ansatz.

Weitere mögliche Herangehensweisen wären durch differenzierte Arbeitshypothesen denkbar. Wenn man beispielsweise die offensichtliche Datenmanipulation der Hauptamtlichen-Liste zusammen mit den Rentenansprüchen ehemaliger HA-ler in die These der gewinnträchtigen Einführung von Personen mit mehreren Identitäten umwandelt, gäbe dies Anlass zur Überprüfung gewisser Geburtstage. Viel Spaß am Gerät.

Andy Müller-Maguhn, andy@ccc.de

Wer noch Material beizusteuern hat, ist herzlich eingeladen, dies an die Redaktion Datenschleuder auf elektronischem ( ds@ccc.de) oder postalischem Wege (Postfach 640236, D-10048 Berlin) zu tun.

ehr geehrte Damen und Herren,

die Betrüger und durch uns inhaftierten Erpresser der GoMoPa versuchen mit einer gefälschten Presse-Mitteilung von sich abzulenken und einen investigativen Journalisten, Bernd Pulch, zu belasten.

Die Presse-Mitteilung auf pressreleaser.org ist eine Fälschung und die gesamte Webseite ist der GoMoPa zu zuordnen.

Hier noch einmal die tatäschlichen Geschehnisse:

Hier der Artikel von “GoMoPa” über Meridian Capital.

„GoMopa“ schreibt:08.09.2008 Weltweite Finanzierungen mit WidersprüchenDie Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. gibt an, weltweite Finanzierungen anbieten zu können und präsentiert sich hierbei auf aufwendig kreierten Webseiten. GOMOPA hat die dort gemachten Angaben analysiert und Widersprüche entdeckt.Der FirmensitzDer Firmensitz befindet sich laut eigener Aussage in Dubai, Vereinigte Arabische Emirate. In einem GOMOPA vorliegenden Schreiben der Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. heißt es jedoch, der Firmensitz sei in London. Auf der Homepage des Unternehmens taucht die Geschäftsadresse in der Londoner Old Broad Street nur als „Kundenabteilung für deutschsprachige Kunden“ auf. Eine weitere Adresse in der englischen Hauptstadt, diesmal in der Windsor Avenue, sei die „Abteilung der Zusammenarbeit mit Investoren“.Die Meridian Capital Enterprises ist tatsächlich als „Limited“ (Ltd.) mit Sitz in England und Wales eingetragen. Aber laut Firmenhomepage hat das Unternehmen seinen „rechtlichen Geschäftssitz“ in Dubai. Eine Abfrage beim Gewerbeamt Dubais (DED) zu dieser Firmierung bleibt ergebnislos.Bemerkenswert ist auch der vermeintliche Sitz in Israel. Auf der Webseite von Meridian Capital Enterprises heißt es: „Die Firma Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. ist im Register des israelischen Justizministeriums unter der Nummer 514108471, gemäß dem Gesellschaftsrecht von 1999, angemeldet.“ Hierzu Martin Kraeter, Gomopa-Partner und Prinzipal der KLP Group Emirates in Dubai: „Es würde keinem einzigen Emirati – geschweige denn einem Scheich auch nur im Traum einfallen, direkte Geschäfte mit Personen oder Firmen aus Israel zu tätigen. Und schon gar nicht würde er zustimmen, dass sein Konterfei auch noch mit vollem Namen auf der Webseite eines Israelischen Unternehmens prangt.“Auf der Internetseite sind diverse Fotos mit Scheichs an Konferenztischen zu sehen. Doch diese großen Tagungen und großen Kongresse der Meridian Capital Enterprises werden in den Pressearchiven der lokalen Presse Dubais mit keinem Wort erwähnt. Martin Kraeter: „ Ein ‚britisch-arabisch-israelisches bankfremdes Finanzinstitut sein zu wollen, wie die Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. es darstellt, ist mehr als zweifelhaft. So etwas gibt es schlicht und ergreifend nicht! Der Nahostkonflikt schwelt schon seit mehr als 50 Jahren. Hier in den Vereinigten Arabischen Emiraten (VAE) werden Israelis erst gar nicht ins Land gelassen. Israelische Produkte sind gebannt. Es gibt nicht einmal direkte Telefonverbindungen. Die VAE haben fast 70% der Wiederaufbaukosten des Libanon geschultert, nachdem Israel dort einmarschiert ist.“Zwei angebliche Großinvestitionen der Meridian Capital Enterprises in Dubai sind Investmentruinen bzw. erst gar nicht realisierte Projekte. Das Unternehmen wirbt mit ihrer finanziellen Beteiligung an dem Dubai Hydropolis Hotel und dem Dubai Snowdome. Der Aktivitätsstatus der Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. ist laut englischen Handelsregister (UK Companies House) „dormant“ gemeldet. Auf der Grundlage des englischen Gesellschaftsrechts können sich eingetragene Unternehmen selbst „dormant“ (schlafend) melden, wenn sie keine oder nur unwesentliche buchhalterisch zu erfassende Transaktionen vorgenommen haben. Dies ist angesichts der angeblichen globalen Investitionstätigkeit der Meridian Capital Ltd. sehr erstaunlich. Der Webauftritt Die Internetseite der MCE ist sehr aufwendig gestaltet, die Investitionen angeblich in Millionen- und Milliardenhöhe. Bei näherer Betrachtung der Präsentationselemente fällt jedoch auf, dass es sich bei zahlreichen veröffentlichen Fotos, die Veranstaltungen der Meridian Capital Enterprises dokumentieren sollen, meist um Fotos von Online-Zeitungen oder frei zugänglichen Medienfotos einzelner Institutionen handelt wie z.B. der Börse Dubai. Auf der Internetpräsenz befinden sich Videofilmchen, die eine frappierende Ähnlichkeit mit dem Werbematerial von NAKHEEL aufweisen, dem größten Bauträger der Vereinigten Arabischen Emirate. Doch den schillernden Videos über die berühmten drei Dubai Palmen „Jumeirah, Jebel Ali und Deira“ oder das Archipel „The World“ wurden offensichtlich selbstproduzierte Trailersequenzen der Meridian Capital Enterprises vorangestellt. Doch könnte es sich bei den Werbevideos um Fremdmaterial handeln. Auch die auf der Webseite wahllos platzierten Fotos von bekannten Sehenswürdigkeiten Dubais fungieren als Augenfang für den interessierten Surfer mit eigenem Finanzierungswunsch. Bei einem Volumen von 10 Millionen Euro oder höher präsentiert sich die Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd. als der passende Investitionspartner. Das Unternehmen verfügt weltweit über zahlreiche Standorte: Berlin, London, Barcelona, Warschau, Moskau, Dubai, Riad, Tel Aviv, Hong Kong und New York. Aber nahezu alle Standorte sind lediglich Virtual Offices eines global arbeitenden Büroservice-Anbieters. „Virtual Office“ heißt im Deutschen schlicht „Briefkastenfirma“. Unter solchen Büroadressen sollen laut Meridian Capital Enterprises ganze Kommissionen ansässig sein, alles zum Wohle des Kunden.“ Zitatende

Hier die Hintergründe der Erpressung:

http://www.immobilien-vertraulich.com/law/7154-opfer-nach-immovation-und-estavis-versucht-gomopa-nun-dkb-zu-erpressen-gomopa-hintermann-ra-resch.html

Hier unsere Original-Stellungnahme:

Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. unveils new criminal phenomena in network. In recently appeared on the net more often at the same time a new a very worrying phenomenon of criminal nature. Professional criminals groups in the network are taking part, to extortion, fraud, Erschwindeln relating to certain specifically selected companies and businesses are capable of. These criminals developed new methods and means, simply and in a short time to bereichern.Strategien and manifestations, which underlie this process are fairly simple. A criminal is looking to “carefully” on the Internet specific companies and corporations (victims of crime) and informed them in the next step, that of the business activities of such companies and corporations in the near future – first on the Internet then in other available mass media – numerous and very unfavorable information appears. At the same time, the criminals beat their future victims an effective means of reducing unnecessary difficulties and problems to escape the loss of good name and image of the company and corporate sector. These offenders are aware of that reputation, name and appearance of each company is a value in itself. It was therefore a value of what each company is prepared to pay any price. But the reason for difficulties and problems arising from the loss of good name and reputation result. The criminals and their victims are already aware that this loss is devastating consequences might have been the closing down of a particular business can enforce. It takes both to No as well as at large companies regard. The company is concerned that in virtually every industry in each country and cross-border activities sind.Das criminal procedure in the form of a blackmail on money, a fraud is becoming rapidly and globally, ie led cross-border and internationally. Among the victims of extortion, fraud is now looking both at home (domestic) and international corporations, the major emphasis on conservation, keeping and maintaining their reputation in the business according to their credibility lay. The criminals in the network have understood that maintaining an unassailable reputation and name of a company the unique ability to provide fast and easy enrichment forms. The above-mentioned criminal procedure is difficult to track because it is international in nature, and by overlapping or even nonexistent (fictional) professional and judicial persons in various countries and operated company wird.Diese offenders in the network publish it and disseminate false information about your victims on remote servers, which are not uncommon in many exotic countries. There are those countries in which serious gaps in the legal system, investigative and prosecution procedures are visible. As an example, at this point mention India werden. Mit criminals working in the network grid portals known leader of blogs with your seat-consciously or unconsciously, even in highly developed countries. For example, at this point, countries such as Germany, Austria, Switzerland, the United States, Britain, Spain or Portugal are mentioned. The below listed criminals were able to act unpunished today. As a symptom of such action appears here the activity and “effectiveness” of the company GOMOPA, which is on countries such as Germany, Switzerland, Austria, the United States, Britain, Spain and India. A good example of such an action is Mr. Klaus Mauri Chat – the leader and “brain” of the company GOMOPA with many already in force and criminal judgments “on his account”, which in this way for years and funded its maintenance in the industry almost unlimited activity. This status will change dramatically, however, including far and wide thanks to discontinued operations of the firm Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. who would oppose such offenses addressed in the network. Other companies and corporations, in which the crime network and outside of this medium have fallen victim to contribute to combating such crimes bei.Die situation is changing, thanks to effective steps and the successful cooperation of the firm Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. with the international police Interpol, with the federal agency (FBI) in the U.S., the Federal Criminal Police in Germany, with Scotland Yard in Britain, as well as with the Russian secret service FSB.Die Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. – Together with other companies and cooperations, the victim of criminal activities of the network of crime have fallen – has undeniably already started to yield results. The fact that in recent weeks (November 2008) on the territory of the Federal Republic of Germany of the above-mentioned leaders and “brain” of the company GOMOPA, Mr Klaus Maurishat was arrested should not be ignored. The Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. information available results clearly show that the next arrests of persons participating in this process in such countries as: Austria, Switzerland, Russia, Ukraine, Poland, Spain, Mexico, Portugal, Brazil, the USA, Canada, UK, Ireland , Australia, New Zealand and made in a.. The ultimate goal of Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. and the other victims of crime in the network is to provide all participants in this criminal procedure before the competent court to lead. All professional and judicial persons, regardless of the seat and out of the business, which the above-described criminal action (fraud, extortion) to have fallen victim can of Meridian Capital Enterprises Ltd.. led company to join the goal set at all at this point the procedure described those associated in the public and the economic life out. II blacklist blackmail and with international fraudsters and their methods (opus operandi) in the following countries: 1 The Federal Republic Deutschland2. Dubai 3rd Russia 1st The Federal Republic of Germany GmbH GOMOPA, Goldman Morgenstern & Partners LLC., Goldman Morgenstern & Partners Consulting LLC, Wottle collection. In these firms are quite active following persons: – Klaus Mauri Chat ( “Father” and “brain” of the criminal organization responsible for countless final judgments have been achieved (arrested in Germany in November 2008) – Josef Rudolf Heckel ( “right hand “when Mr Klaus Mauri chat, denounced former banker who is excessive in many Bankschmuggeleien was involved.
The study of 900 pages named Toxdat by Ehrenfried Stelzer is the “Stasi Killer Bible”. It lists all kind of murder methods and concentrates on the most effective and untraceable.
“The toxdat study was ordered by Stasi Vice-President Gerhard Neiber, the second man in rank after boss Erich Mielke. The toxdat study was also the theoretical “story book” for the murder of the famous German watchdog and journalist Heinz Gerlach by former Stasi member under the guidance of “GoMoPa”,” an informer stated. “Ehrenfried stelzer” was nicknamed “Professor Murder” by his victims. Even close co-worker now compare him with the German SS”doctor” Mengele, “Dr. Death” from Auschwitz.
Only two articles let the German audience believe that the famous journalist and watchdog Heinz Gerlach died on natural courses by blood pollution.

For more Information the victims have launched a new site: http://www.victims-opfer.com

The first one, published only hours after the death of Mr Heinz Gerlach by the notorious “GoMoPa” (see article below) and a second 3 days later by a small German local newspaper, Weserbergland Nachrichten.
Many people including the hostile Gerlach website “Akte Heinz Gerlach” doubted that this man who had so many enemies and friends would die of natural causes without any previous warning. Rumours occured that Mr. Gerlach’s doctor doubted natural courses at all. After many critical voices discussed the issue a small website of a small German local newspaper – which never before had reported about Mr. Heinz Gerlach and which is not even in the region of Mr Gerlachs home – published that Mr Gerlach died of blood pollution. Weserbergland-Nachrichten published a long article about the deadly consequences of blood pollution and did not even name the source of such an important statement. It claimed only that somebody of Gerlachs inner circle had said this. It is a proven fact that after the collpase of the Eastern German Communist Regime many former Communist propaganda agents went to regional newspapers – often in Western Germany like Günther Schabowski did the man who opened the “Mauer”.
The theatre stage was set: One day later the hostile Gerlach website “Akte Heinz Gerlach” took the agenda publishing that Mr Gerlach had died for natural causes without any further research at all.
This was done by a website which for months and months and months reported everything about Mr. Gerlach.
Furthermore a research proves that the technical details regarding the website hosting of this hostile website “Akte Heinz Gerlach” proves that there are common details with the hosting of “GoMoPa” and their affiliates as proven by the SJB-GoMoPa-victims (see http://www.sjb-fonds-opfer.com)
Insiders believe that the murderers of Mr. Heinz Gerlach are former members of the Eastern German Terror Organisation “Stasi” with dioxins. They also believe that “GoMoPa” was part of the plot. At “GoMoPa”’ a person named Siegfried Siewers was officialy responsible for the press but never appeared in public. “GoMoPa”-victims say that this name was a cameo for “GoMoPa” frontrunner Klaus Maurischat who is controlled by the Stasi Top Agent Ehrenfried Stelzner, Berlin.
Siegfried Sievers, a former Stasi member is responsible for the pollution of millions Germanys for many years with dioxins. This was unveiled at 5th of January 2011 by German prosecutors.
The victims say that Maurischat (probably also a Stasi cameo) and Sievers were in contact as Sievers acted as Stasi Agent and was in fact already a specialist in dioxins under the Communist Terror Regime in Eastern Germany.
Furthermore the Stasi Top Agent Ehrenfried Stelzer disguised as Professor for Criminal studies during the Communist Regime at the Eastern Berlin Humboldt University.
Background:
The man behind the Berlin lawyer Jochen Resch and his activities is Ehrenfried Stelzer, former Stasi Top officer in Berlin and “Professor for Criminal Studies” at the Eastern Berlin Humboldt University during the Communist regime, the SJB-GoMoPa-victims say (www.sjb-fonds-opfer.com) is responsable for the killing of German watchdog and journalist Heinz Gerlach.
These informations stem from various sources who were close to the criminal organization of GoMoPa in the last years. The SJB-GoMoPa say that the well-known German watchdog and journalist Heinz Gerlach was killed by former Stasi members with dioxins. Polychlorinated dibenzodioxins (PCDDs), or simply dioxins, are a group of organic polyhalogenated compounds that are significant because they act as environmental pollutants. They are commonly referred to as dioxins for simplicity in scientific publications because every PCDD molecule contains a dioxin skeletal structure. Typically, the p-dioxin skeleton is at the core of a PCDD molecule, giving the molecule a dibenzo-p-dioxin ring system. Members of the PCDD family have been shown to bioaccumulate in humans and wildlife due to their lipophilic properties, and are known teratogens, mutagens, and confirmed (avered) human carcinogens. They are organic compounds.
Dioxins build up primarily in fatty tissues over time (bioaccumulate), so even small exposures may eventually reach dangerous levels. In 1994, the US EPA reported that dioxins are a probable carcinogen, but noted that non-cancer effects (reproduction and sexual development, immune system) may pose an even greater threat to human health. TCDD, the most toxic of the dibenzodioxins, is classified as a Group 1 carcinogen by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC).
In 2004, a notable individual case of dioxin poisoning, Ukrainian politician Viktor Yushchenko was exposed to the second-largest measured dose of dioxins, according to the reports of the physicians responsible for diagnosing him. This is the first known case of a single high dose of TCDD dioxin poisoning, and was diagnosed only after a toxicologist recognized the symptoms of chloracne while viewing television news coverage of his condition.
German dioxin scandal: In January 2011 about 4700 German farms were banned from making deliveries after tests at the Harles und Jentzsch plant in the state of Schleswig-Holstein showed high levels of dioxin. Again this incident appears to involve PCBs and not PCDDs at all. Dioxin were found in animal feed and eggs in many farms. The person who is responsible for this, Siegfried Sievert is also a former Stasi Agent. At “GoMoPa” the notorious Eastern-Berlin press agency (see article below) one of the henchmen acted under the name of “Siegfried Siewert”.
Further evidence for the killing of Mr.Heinz Gerlach is provided by the SJB-GoMoPa-victims by analyzing the dubious role of former Stasi-Top-agent Ehrenfried Stelzer, also a former “Professor for Crime Studies” under the Communist regime in Eastern Germany and the dubious role of “detective” Medard Fuchsgruber. Both are closely tied to the dubious “GoMoPa” and Berlin lawyer Jochen Resch.
According to the SJB-GoMoPa-victims is Berlin lawyer Jochen Resch the mastermind of the criminal organization “GoMoPa2. The victims state that they have a source inside “GoMoPa” who helped them discover  the shocking truth. The so-called “Deep Throat from Berlin” has information that Resch had the idea to found the criminal organization “GoMoPa” and use non-existing Jewish lawyers  named Goldman, Morgenstern & Partner as camouflage. Their “office” in Madison Avenue, New York, is a mailbox. This is witnessed by a German Ex-Patriot, a lawyer, whose father, Heinz Gerlach, died under strange circumstances.
Resch seems to use “GoMoPa” as an instrument to blackmail parts of the German Property and Investment.

German authorities are under growing pressure to reopen investigations into at least a dozen suspicious deaths after the arrest of an alleged East German assassin cast new light on the communist regime. Stasi victims quoted a source saying “isolated units” had conducted operations that were “extremely well organised” and had “100 per cent logistical support” from the East German state.
A statement from prosecutors read: “The accused [Jurgen G] is suspected, as a member of a commando of the former DDR, of killing a number of people between 1976 and 1987 who from the point of view of the DDR regime had committed treason or were threatening to do so.”
Details of his Jurgen G’s arrest have been described in suitably florid terms, with the mass circulation tabloid Bild saying he was working at the Wolfsbruch marina near Rheinsberg in north-eastern Germany when a woman approached him. “Excuse me, is that your yellow Trabant in the car park? I just ran into it with my car,” she is said to have asked.
When he followed her to the car park, masked officers jumped out of vans and bushes and overpowered him in an operation worthy of the Stasi itself.
An eyewitness told Bild: “They blindfolded him and raced off in an unmarked car.”
Police across Germany are reported to be sifting through files to see who the victims may have been, and some intelligence officers are greeting the arrest of Jurgen G as a breakthrough.
Thomas Auerbach, who works for the Stasi file authority in Berlin and has written a book based on the death squad files, said: “These people were trained to make such murders look like accidents or suicides, even as ‘ordinary’ crimes such as robberies. They were real terror experts.”
The cases said to be linked to Jurgen G or his unit include many people involved with the commercial arm of the East German ruling socialist party, the SED (Socialist Unity Party).
Uwe Harms, the head of a Hamburg-based haulage firm which was part of a network of companies secretly owned by the SED, disappeared in March 1987 after conversations with various DDR functionaries. Six weeks later, his body was found in a plastic bag.
Weeks before his death he told friends that he felt he was being followed. After reunification, one of the other SED company heads said Mr Harms had been liquidated for refusing to allow his firm to be used to transport arms into East Germany.
Dieter Vogel, a businessman who had been jailed for life for spying for the CIA, was found suffocated in his cell in the East German prison Bautzen on March 9, 1982. The fact that he was due to be taken to the West in a spy swap arrangement just a few weeks later cast doubt on the suicide theory.
He had passed the names of several Stasi moles to the BND, West Germany’s heavily penetrated counter-intelligence service.
The Christian Democrat Union politician Uwe Barschel, 43, was found dead by magazine reporters in his bathtub in a hotel room in Geneva in October, 1987. He died of poisoning, but rumours that he was involved somehow in arms deals and the Stasi have clung to the case.
One of the more high-profile and enduring mysteries is that of Lutz Eigendorf, an East German footballer from the Stasi-backed Dynamo Berlin.
He fled to the West in 1979 amid great publicity. Four years later, he died after crashing his car into a tree on a straight stretch of road with blood alcohol levels way over the limit. Witnesses who had seen him earlier in the evening said he had not been drinking.
Most controversial though is the suggestion that the assassination squad was linked to the murder of a Swedish television reporter and her friend in 1984.
Cats Falk and her friend Lena Graens went missing on Nov 19, 1984. Their bodies were fished out of a Stockholm canal six months later.
Reports suggested a three-man assassination squad killed them, spiking their drinks with drugs, putting them into their car and pushing it into the Hammarby canal.
Shortly before her death, Cats Falk had reportedly uncovered a deal between an arms dealer and an East German firm.
Germany has recently undergone a wave of nostalgia for all things East German, dubbed Ostalgie, with colourful television shows featuring former DDR stars such as the ice skater Katerina Witt talking wistfully about socialist pop music.
A reassessment may be coming in the wake of the revelations.

Victims: The DDR-STASI MURDER GANG “GoMOPa” in murderoplot against Joerg Berger

The Stasi Murder Gang of „GoMoPa“ was involved in many trials to kill the popular East German soccer trainer Joerg Berger, Stasi victims tell in postings on their hompage http://www.sjb-fonds-opfer.com. Berger stated before his early death in his biography that they tried to pollute him with arsenic.
Arsenic and many of its compounds are especially potent poisons. Many water supplies close to mines are contaminated by these poisons. Arsenic disrupts ATP production through several mechanisms. At the level of the citric acid cycle, arsenic inhibits lipoic acid which is a cofactor for pyruvate dehydrogenase; and by competing with phosphate it uncouples oxidative phosphorylation, thus inhibiting energy-linked reduction of NAD+, mitochondrial respiration and ATP synthesis. Hydrogen peroxide production is also increased, which might form reactive oxygen species and oxidative stress. These metabolic interferences lead to death from multi-system organ failure, probably from necrotic cell death, not apoptosis. A post mortem reveals brick red coloured mucosa, owing to severe haemorrhage. Although arsenic causes toxicity, it can also play a protective role.[
Elemental arsenic and arsenic compounds are classified as “toxic” and “dangerous for the environment” in the European Union under directive 67/548/EEC. The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) recognizes arsenic and arsenic compounds as group 1 carcinogens, and the EU lists arsenic trioxide, arsenic pentoxide and arsenate salts as category 1 carcinogens.
Arsenic is known to cause arsenicosis owing to its manifestation in drinking water, “the most common species being arsenate [HAsO42- ; As(V)] and arsenite [H3AsO3 ; As(III)]”. The ability of arsenic to undergo redox conversion between As(III) and As(V) makes its availability in the environment more abundant. According to Croal, Gralnick, Malasarn and Newman, “[the] understanding [of] what stimulates As(III) oxidation and/or limits As(V) reduction is relevant for bioremediation of contaminated sites (Croal). The study of chemolithoautotrophic As(III) oxidizers and the heterotrophic As(V) reducers can help the understanding of the oxidation and/or reduction of arsenic.
Treatment of chronic arsenic poisoning is easily accomplished. British anti-lewisite (dimercaprol) is prescribed in dosages of 5 mg/kg up to 300 mg each 4 hours for the first day. Then administer the same dosage each 6 hours for the second day. Then prescribe this dosage each 8 hours for eight additional days. However the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) states that the long term effects of arsenic exposure cannot be predicted. Blood, urine, hair and nails may be tested for arsenic, however these tests cannot foresee possible health outcomes due to the exposure. Excretion occurs in the urine and long term exposure to arsenic has been linked to bladder and kidney cancer in addition to cancer of the liver, prostate, skin, lungs and nasal cavity.[
Occupational exposure and arsenic poisoning may occur in persons working in industries involving the use of inorganic arsenic and its compounds, such as wood preservation, glass production, nonferrous metal alloys and electronic semiconductor manufacturing. Inorganic arsenic is also found in coke oven emissions associated with the smelter industry.

THE DDR GESTAPO-STASI MURDER GANG responsable for the murder of Lutz Eigendorf

The talented Eigendorf played for East German side Dynamo Berlin.
He made his debut for the GDR in an August 1978 match against Bulgaria, immediately scoring his first two goals in a 2–2 draw. He went on to collect six caps, scoring three goals.[1] His final international was a February 1979 friendly match against Iraq.
On 20 March 1979, after a friendship match between Dynamo and West German club 1. FC Kaiserslautern in Gießen he fled to the west hoping to play for that team. But because of his defection he was banned from play for one year by UEFA and instead spent that time as a youth coach with the club.
This was not the first time an East German athlete had fled to the west, but it was a particularly embarrassing defection. Eigendorf’s club Dynamo was under the patronage of the Stasi, East Germany’s secretive state police, and subject to the personal attentions of the organisation’s head, Erich Mielke. He ensured that the club’s roster was made up of the country’s best players, as well as arranging for the manipulation of matches in Dynamo’s favour. After his defection Eigendorf openly criticised the DDR in the western media.
His wife Gabriele remained behind in Berlin with their daughter and was placed under constant police surveillance. Lawyers working for the Stasi quickly arranged a divorce and the former Frau Eigendorf re-married. Her new husband was eventually revealed as a Lothario – an agent of the state police whose role it was to spy on a suspect while romancing them.
In 1983 Eigendorf moved from Kaiserslautern to join Eintracht Braunschweig, all the while under the scrutiny of the Stasi who employed a number of West Germans as informants. On 5 March that year he was badly injured in a suspicious traffic accident and died within two days. An autopsy indicated a high blood alcohol level despite the testimony of people he had met with that evening indicating that Eigendorf had only a small amount of beer to drink.
After German re-unification and the subsequent opening of the files of the former East Germany’s state security service it was revealed that the traffic accident had been an assassination attempt orchestrated by the Stasi, confirming the longtime suspicions held by many. A summary report of the events surrounding Eigendorf’s death was made on German television on 22 March 2000 which detailed an investigation by Heribert Schwan in the documentary “Tod dem Verräter” (“Death to the Traitor”).
On 10 February 2010, a former East German spy revealed the Stasi ordered him to kill Eigendorf, which he claimed not to have done

MfS has been accused of a number of assassinations against political dissidents and other people both inside and outside the country. Examples include the East German football player Lutz Eigendorf and the Swedish journalist Cats Falck.
The terrorists who killed Alfred Herrhausen were professionals. They dressed as construction workers to lay a wire under the pavement of the road along Mr. Herrhausen’s usual route to work. They planted a sack of armor-piercing explosives on a parked bicycle by the roadside. An infrared beam shining across the road triggered the explosion just when the limousine, one of three cars in a convoy, sped by.
The operation, from the terrorists’ point of view, was flawless: Mr. Herrhausen, the chairman of one of Europe’s most powerful companies, Deutsche Bank, was killed in the explosion along that suburban Frankfurt road on Nov. 30, 1989.
But was everything what it seemed?
Within days, the Red Army Faction — a leftist terrorist group that had traumatized West Germany since 1970 with a series of high-profile crimes and brazen killings of bankers and industrialists — claimed responsibility for the assassination. An intense manhunt followed. In June 1990, police arrested 10 Red Army Faction members who had fled to East Germany to avoid arrest for other crimes. To the police’s surprise, they were willing to talk. Equally confounding to authorities: All had solid alibis. None was charged in the Herrhausen attack.
Now, almost two decades later, German police, prosecutors and other security officials have focused on a new suspect: the East German secret police, known as the Stasi. Long fodder for spy novelists like John le Carré, the shadowy Stasi controlled every aspect of East German life through imprisonment, intimidation and the use of informants — even placing a spy at one point in the office of West German Chancellor Willy Brandt.
According to documents reviewed by The Wall Street Journal, the murders of Mr. Herrhausen and others attributed to the Red Army Faction bear striking resemblance to methods and tactics pioneered by a special unit of the Stasi. The unit reported to Stasi boss Erich Mielke and actively sought in the waning years of the communist regime to imitate the Red Army Faction to mask their own attacks against prominent people in Western Germany and destabilize the country.
“The investigation has intensified in recent months,” said Frank Wallenta, a spokesman for the Federal Prosecutor. “And we are investigating everything, including leads to the Stasi.”
If those leads turn out to be true, it would mean not only rewriting some of the most dramatic episodes of the Cold War, but would likely accelerate a broader soul-searching now under way in Germany about the communist past.
In building a reunified country, many Germans have ignored discussion of the brutal realities of its former communist half. When the former East Germany is discussed, it’s often with nostalgia or empathy for brothers hostage to Soviet influence.

Stasi boss Erich Mielke, middle, with unnamed associates
That taboo is slowly being broken. Last year’s Oscar-winning movie, “The Lives of Others,” chronicled in dark detail a Stasi agent’s efforts to subvert the lives of ordinary people. Material in the Stasi archives shows that senior leaders had a shoot-to-kill order against those fleeing from East to West — a controversial order that contradicts East German leaders’ claims that they never ordered any shootings.
This story is based on more than a dozen interviews with police, prosecutors and other security officials. Several policemen and prosecutors confirmed that the allegation of extensive Stasi involvement with the Red Army Faction is a key part of the current investigation.
Court cases in West Germany in the 1990s established that members of the Red Army Faction were granted free passage to other countries in the 1970s and refuge in East Germany in the 1980s. But the current investigation and documents from Stasi archives suggest far deeper involvement — that members of the Red Army Faction were not only harbored by the Stasi but methodically trained in sophisticated techniques of bombing and murder.
Traudl Herrhausen, Mr. Herrhausen’s widow, is one of those pushing for further investigation. She says she long suspected involvement by the Stasi or other intelligence service such as the KGB, but never spoke publicly because she didn’t have evidence and didn’t want to interfere in the investigation. She says she is now breaking an 18-year silence in her desire to see justice done. “Now I want to look my husband’s killers in the eye,” she said in an interview.
The Red Army Faction was founded about 1970 by a band of leftists who justified their terrorism based on opposition to West Germany’s ruling elite. Killing members of this elite would provoke the West German state to take repressive measures that would show its true fascist face, Red Army Faction leaders believed.
In its early years, the group, also known as the Baader-Meinhof band, made headlines with prison breaks, bank robberies, bomb attacks and deadly shootouts. Four gang members led by Ulrike Meinhof freed Red Army Faction leader Andreas Baader from a Berlin jail a month after his arrest.
Red Army Faction violence in West Germany intensified in 1977 when Jürgen Ponto, then head of Dresdner Bank, was shot and killed at his home. Five weeks later, the group killed four people and abducted the chairman of the German employer association, Hans-Martin Schleyer, one of West Germany’s most prominent businessmen. It was the start of a six-week ordeal in which neither government nor terrorists would compromise. To support the Red Army Faction cause, Palestinian terrorists hijacked a Lufthansa jet in Spain, forcing it to land in Mogadishu, Somalia. After the plane was rushed by West German commandos, top Red Army Faction leaders in West Germany committed suicide and Mr. Schleyer was executed by his captors.
Red Army Faction violence began to abate in the late 1970s after the Lufthansa incident. Many in Germany thought the group — whose attacks were often crude — lost its will to kill after the arrest of its senior leaders in 1982. So when the group appeared to renew its terror campaign with a series of high-profile attacks in 1985, police were stunned by the level of their sophistication and determination.
This time, the group dazzled police with its ability to hit targets and leave little substantial evidence behind. They used high-tech devices no one thought they possessed. Their marksmen killed with military precision.

Weapons used by terrorists during the 1977 kidnapping of German industrialist Hanns-Martin Schleyer.
Surprisingly, members of the Red Army Faction so-called third generation had a policeman’s understanding of forensic science. From 1985 onward, the Red Army Faction rarely left a fingerprint or other useful piece of evidence at a crime scene, according to court records. The murder cases from this era are still open. Some suspected Stasi involvement, but no one could ever prove it, according to a senior police official.
The 1989 car-bomb murder of Mr. Herrhausen particularly stunned police with its audacity and sophistication. Mr. Herrhausen was the head of Deutsche Bank, Germany’s largest bank. He was part of the political-business elite that helped turn West Germany from a war-ravaged rump state into an economic powerhouse — all while East Germany languished in frustration. Mr. Herrhausen was a vocal proponent of a united Germany.
In November 1989, Mr. Herrhausen was following the fall of the Berlin wall and events in the Soviet Union closely, conferring frequently with Mikhail Gorbachev, according to his wife and friends. Then on Nov. 27, Mr. Herrhausen announced a plan to acquire the investment banking firm Morgan Grenfell — at the time a record-breaking bank acquisition.
Also during November, a spot along Mr. Herrhausen’s usual route to work was closed because of construction. Terrorists, dressed as construction workers, laid an electric wire under the road’s pavement. On Nov. 29, the stretch reopened.
On the morning of Nov. 30, like every workday morning, Mr. Herrhausen stepped into his limousine at about 8:30. Mr. Herrhausen’s driver waited about one minute to allow the first of the three-car entourage to drive ahead and survey the road.
“It was the route they hadn’t used in weeks,” Mrs. Herrhausen said.
As Mr. Herrhausen sped down the road, a team of terrorists waited. Beside the road, a parked bicycle held a sack of armor-piercing explosives. The detonator was connected by the electric wire under the road to a trigger activated by an interruption in an infrared beam shining across the road.
A terrorist activated the detonator after the first car of bodyguards drove past the bomb. Mr. Herrhausen died at the scene.
As they had during previous attacks, police set up dragnets to round up Red Army Faction cadre. But the June 1990 arrests of 10 members of the group who had earlier been granted political asylum in East Germany produced no leads. All the seized Red Army Faction members had solid alibis.
In July 1991, prosecutors believed they had a breakthrough when an informant claimed he had allowed two members of the Red Army Faction to stay at his home near the Herrhausen residence. Prosecutors followed that trail 13 years before dropping charges in 2004.
Frustrated with the inability of prosecutors to solve the Herrhausen case and believing that prosecutors were ignoring other leads including possible Stasi involvement, German officials replaced the prosecutor overseeing the case.
Police acknowledge that part of the reason for their focus on possible Stasi involvement was that all other leads had dried up. But they say they also knew that over the years the Stasi had worked with and given explosives to other terrorists, including “Carlos the Jackal” and the Basque group ETA in Spain. And in 2001 to 2003, an undercover police officer met with a man who claimed he had been a killer for the Stasi operating in Western Germany, although police were never able to tie him to specific murders.
German investigators turned their attention to Wartin, a small eastern German village nestled in yellow-brown fields of grain near the Polish border. Today, sheep graze in a field spotted with wooden posts.
In the 1980s, however, Wartin was home to the Stasi’s AGM/S — “Minister Working Group/Special Operations.” It got its name because it reported to Mr. Mielke, the minister who headed the Stasi for almost all of East Germany’s 40-year history.
The Wartin unit’s peacetime duties included the kidnapping and murder of influential people in the West, according to Stasi records reviewed by The Wall Street Journal in the Stasi archives in Berlin.
The documents say the unit’s activities included “intimidating anti-communist opinion leaders” by “liquidation,” and “kidnapping or hostage taking, connected with the demand that political messages be read,” according to a description of the unit’s activities written by a senior Wartin official in 1982.
Based on these documents, German investigators increasingly believe that the Stasi played a more active role than previously believed in Red Army Faction terrorism. After years of not being able to draw parallels between the Stasi unit in Wartin and the Red Army Faction killings, police are now focusing closely on such a link. Joachim Lampe, who assisted the successful prosecution of the first wave of Red Army Faction terrorists up until 1982 and was then assigned to prosecute Stasi-related crimes in West Germany, says it’s time to compare the activities of Wartin with the activities of the Red Army Faction to see where they overlap. “It is an important line of investigation,” he said.
A year after the Red Army Faction’s first generation collapsed in 1972, an internal Wartin report said cooperation with terrorists is possible if the individuals could be trusted to maintain secrecy and obey orders. Initial contacts, however, may not have taken place until later in the decade. Disillusionment gripped many of the terrorists living on the lam, according to court records citing witness statements by accused terrorists. Beginning about 1980, the Stasi granted refuge to 10 members of the Red Army Faction in East Germany and gave them assumed identities.
The Stasi sympathized with the anti-capitalist ideals of the Red Army Faction, but Stasi leaders were concerned about placing their trust in a group of uncontrollable leftist militants, a review of Stasi records shows. Stasi officials did not want to tarnish East Germany’s international reputation, so they toyed with different concepts for cooperation with terrorist groups, according to a prosecutor who has investigated Stasi involvement with terrorism.
One suggestion, contained in a document prepared for new officers assigned to the unit, was to emulate Romanian intelligence, which successfully worked with the terrorist “Carlos” to bomb the Radio Free Europe office in Munich, Germany, in 1981. To assist in such operations, the Wartin unit developed highly specialized explosives, poisons and miniature firearms.
About 1980 the Stasi also proposed a second strategy: instead of using a terrorist group directly — such cooperation always contained risk of discovery — they could simply execute attacks so similar to those of known terrorists that police would never look for a second set of suspects, according to Wartin records. The Wartin leadership called this strategy the “perpetrator principle,” according to Stasi records. The unit’s progress in implementing the steps to imitate terrorist attacks is described in a series of progress reports by Wartin officials between 1980 and 1987.
In September 1981, Red Army Faction terrorists attempted to kill U.S. Gen. James Kroesen in Heidelberg, Germany, shooting a bazooka at his car. About the same time, members of the same Red Army Faction team visited East Germany, where they were asked by the Stasi to shoot a bazooka at a car containing a dog. The dog died, according to court records.
In Wartin, officials wrote up a detailed description of the Red Army Faction members’ re-enactment of the Kroesen attack. “It is important to collect all accessible information about the terrorist scene in imperialist countries, to study and analyze their equipment, methods and tactics, so we can do it ourselves,” a senior Wartin official wrote in February 1982, according to the report.
In 1982, West German police discovered two troves of Red Army Faction weapons and documents buried in German forests. Three terrorists, including Red Army Faction leader Christian Klar, were arrested when they approached the sites. The troves were buried in locations easy to find at night, a tactic used by Wartin’s own agents to store operational equipment in West Germany, according to an investigator who viewed the troves and Stasi records.
That same year, a Wartin official described the staged bombing of a moving vehicle. According to the report, several Stasi officers shed “tears of joy” when electronic sensors detected the approaching car and ignited the detonator.
A spokesman at Germany’s federal police investigative agency, the equivalent of the U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation, declined to comment on the close similarity between the detonator used in the demonstration and the device that killed Mr. Herrhausen, saying this is part of their investigation.
Wartin officers continued their preparations for imitating terrorist attacks in West Germany, according to a 1985 internal Wartin report. They created a special archive profiling the characteristics of known terrorists and terrorist groups, and taught staff members to execute nearly identical attacks, according to Stasi records. Each year, the unit’s officers detailed the unit’s success in teaching these techniques in their annual reports, according to the reports.
Then, in 1987, the AGM/S stopped offensive operations. The unit was disbanded.
Werner Grossmann, a former three-star Stasi General and former head of foreign intelligence operations, says the AGM/S was responsible for planning attacks in West Germany, but was dissolved “because it didn’t produce results.” Mr. Grossmann assumed control of part of the AGM/S after most of the unit was dissolved.
Mr. Grossmann says he took control of part of the AGM/S because he wanted to run intelligence operations against West Germany’s civil defense infrastructure.
“I refused to have anything to do with terrorism and terrorists,” Mr. Grossmann said in an interview. He said he didn’t have any influence over the AGM/S activities before 1987 and wasn’t informed about the unit’s activities before it came under his control.
Olaf Barnickel, a career Stasi officer who served at Wartin, says his unit planned murders in West Germany, but never committed one. “It was all theory and no practice,” Mr. Barnickel said in an interview.
But some German police are unpersuaded. They believe the seeds may have been planted for future violent attacks.
In November 1989, as East Germany disintegrated, groups of citizens forced their way into Stasi installations, seizing control. In Wartin, a local church minister led a group of demonstrators to the main entrance of the Stasi base. The base closed.
Within the Stasi as a whole, the chain of command began to disintegrate. Links to organizations in West Germany, including the Red Army Faction, were broken.
Sixteen months after Mr. Herrhausen’s murder, the Red Army Faction claimed its last victim, killing Detlev Karsten Rohwedder, the head of the Treuhandanstalt, the powerful trust that controlled most state-owned assets in the former East Germany and was overseeing their privatization. Mr. Rohwedder was killed while he was standing by the window of his house in Düsseldorf.
The murder was performed by a trained sharpshooter, according to a police official familiar with the investigation. The Stasi trained members of the Red Army Faction in sharpshooting skills and had its own teams of sharpshooters, according to witness statements by Stasi officials to a Berlin prosecutor and Stasi records.
In 1998, the Red Army Faction issued the last of its communiques, announcing it was disbanding. German police attribute the group’s disappearance to changing times, which made the group seem a relic of the past. Indeed, the Red Army Faction today is largely seen by the German public as part of the social upheaval that plagued West Germany in the 1970s and 1980s. More than one in four Germans consider former Red Army Faction members to have been misguided idealists. More than half now think the investigations should be closed for good in the coming decade when the current group of Red Army Faction prisoners finish serving their prison sentences.
German prosecutors say their investigation of the Stasi’s role is continuing.
Since last month, Mrs. Herrhausen has been in contact with the next of kin of victims in the other unsolved Red Army Faction murder cases, looking for support to push the investigation. The bomb that killed her husband nearly 18 years ago exploded soon after he left for work, within earshot of their home in suburban Frankfurt.
“I still hear that bomb every day,” she says.

Only two articles let the German audience believe that the famous journalist and watchdog Heinz Gerlach died on natural courses by blood pollution.
The first one, published only hours after the death of Mr Heinz Gerlach by the notorious “GoMoPa” (see article below) and a second 3 days later by a small German local newspaper, Weserbergland Nachrichten.
Many people including the hostile Gerlach website “Akte Heinz Gerlach” doubted that this man who had so many enemies and friends would die of natural causes without any previous warning. Rumours occured that Mr. Gerlach’s doctor doubted natural courses at all. After many critical voices discussed the issue a small website of a small German local newspaper – which never before had reported about Mr. Heinz Gerlach and which is not even in the region of Mr Gerlachs home – published that Mr Gerlach died of blood pollution. Weserbergland-Nachrichten published a long article about the deadly consequences of blood pollution and did not even name the source of such an important statement. It claimed only that somebody of Gerlachs inner circle had said this. It is a proven fact that after the collpase of the Eastern German Communist Regime many former Communist propaganda agents went to regional newspapers – often in Western Germany like Günther Schabowski did the man who opened the “Mauer”.
The theatre stage was set: One day later the hostile Gerlach website “Akte Heinz Gerlach” took the agenda publishing that Mr Gerlach had died for natural causes without any further research at all.
This was done by a website which for months and months and months reported everything about Mr. Gerlach.
Furthermore a research proves that the technical details regarding the website hosting of this hostile website “Akte Heinz Gerlach” proves that there are common details with the hosting of “GoMoPa” and their affiliates as proven by the SJB-GoMoPa-victims (see http://www.sjb-fonds-opfer.com)
Insiders believe that the murderers of Mr. Heinz Gerlach are former members of the Eastern German Terror Organisation “Stasi” with dioxins. They also believe that “GoMoPa” was part of the plot. At “GoMoPa”’ a person named Siegfried Siewers was officialy responsible for the press but never appeared in public. “GoMoPa”-victims say that this name was a cameo for “GoMoPa” frontrunner Klaus Maurischat who is controlled by the Stasi Top Agent Ehrenfried Stelzner, Berlin.
Siegfried Sievers, a former Stasi member is responsible for the pollution of millions Germanys for many years with dioxins. This was unveiled at 5th of January 2011 by German prosecutors.
The victims say that Maurischat (probably also a Stasi cameo) and Sievers were in contact as Sievers acted as Stasi Agent and was in fact already a specialist in dioxins under the Communist Terror Regime in Eastern Germany.
Furthermore the Stasi Top Agent Ehrenfried Stelzer disguised as Professor for Criminal studies during the Communist Regime at the Eastern Berlin Humboldt University.
Background:
The man behind the Berlin lawyer Jochen Resch and his activities is Ehrenfried Stelzer, former Stasi Top officer in Berlin and “Professor for Criminal Studies” at the Eastern Berlin Humboldt University during the Communist regime, the SJB-GoMoPa-victims say (www.sjb-fonds-opfer.com) is responsable for the killing of German watchdog and journalist Heinz Gerlach.
These informations stem from various sources who were close to the criminal organization of GoMoPa in the last years. The SJB-GoMoPa say that the well-known German watchdog and journalist Heinz Gerlach was killed by former Stasi members with dioxins. Polychlorinated dibenzodioxins (PCDDs), or simply dioxins, are a group of organic polyhalogenated compounds that are significant because they act as environmental pollutants. They are commonly referred to as dioxins for simplicity in scientific publications because every PCDD molecule contains a dioxin skeletal structure. Typically, the p-dioxin skeleton is at the core of a PCDD molecule, giving the molecule a dibenzo-p-dioxin ring system. Members of the PCDD family have been shown to bioaccumulate in humans and wildlife due to their lipophilic properties, and are known teratogens, mutagens, and confirmed (avered) human carcinogens. They are organic compounds.
Dioxins build up primarily in fatty tissues over time (bioaccumulate), so even small exposures may eventually reach dangerous levels. In 1994, the US EPA reported that dioxins are a probable carcinogen, but noted that non-cancer effects (reproduction and sexual development, immune system) may pose an even greater threat to human health. TCDD, the most toxic of the dibenzodioxins, is classified as a Group 1 carcinogen by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC).
In 2004, a notable individual case of dioxin poisoning, Ukrainian politician Viktor Yushchenko was exposed to the second-largest measured dose of dioxins, according to the reports of the physicians responsible for diagnosing him. This is the first known case of a single high dose of TCDD dioxin poisoning, and was diagnosed only after a toxicologist recognized the symptoms of chloracne while viewing television news coverage of his condition.
German dioxin scandal: In January 2011 about 4700 German farms were banned from making deliveries after tests at the Harles und Jentzsch plant in the state of Schleswig-Holstein showed high levels of dioxin. Again this incident appears to involve PCBs and not PCDDs at all. Dioxin were found in animal feed and eggs in many farms. The person who is responsible for this, Siegfried Sievert is also a former Stasi Agent. At “GoMoPa” the notorious Eastern-Berlin press agency (see article below) one of the henchmen acted under the name of “Siegfried Siewert”.
Further evidence for the killing of Mr.Heinz Gerlach is provided by the SJB-GoMoPa-victims by analyzing the dubious role of former Stasi-Top-agent Ehrenfried Stelzer, also a former “Professor for Crime Studies” under the Communist regime in Eastern Germany and the dubious role of “detective” Medard Fuchsgruber. Both are closely tied to the dubious “GoMoPa” and Berlin lawyer Jochen Resch.
According to the SJB-GoMoPa-victims is Berlin lawyer Jochen Resch the mastermind of the criminal organization “GoMoPa2. The victims state that they have a source inside “GoMoPa” who helped them discover  the shocking truth. The so-called “Deep Throat from Berlin” has information that Resch had the idea to found the criminal organization “GoMoPa” and use non-existing Jewish lawyers  named Goldman, Morgenstern & Partner as camouflage. Their “office” in Madison Avenue, New York, is a mailbox. This is witnessed by a German Ex-Patriot, a lawyer, whose father, Heinz Gerlach, died under strange circumstances.
Resch seems to use “GoMoPa” as an instrument to blackmail parts of the German Property and Investment.

The name of Benno Ohnesorg became a rallying cry for the West German left after he was shot dead by police in 1967. Newly discovered documents indicate that the cop who shot him may have been a spy for the East German secret police.
It was one of the most important events leading up to the wave of radical left-wing violence which washed over West Germany in the 1970s. On the evening of June 2, 1967, the literature student Benno Ohnesorg took part in a demonstration at West Berlin’s opera house. Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, the shah of Iran, was to attend and the gathered students wanted to call attention to his brutal regime.
The protests, though, got out of hand. Pro-shah demonstrators, some of them flown in from Iran for the occasion, battled with the student protestors. West Berlin police also did their part, brutally beating back the crowd. At 8:30 p.m., a shot was fired, and a short time later the 26-year-old Ohnesorg, having been hit in the back of the head, became the left wing’s first martyr.
Now, though, the history of the event may have to be re-written. New documents discovered in the Stasi archive — the vast collection of files left behind by the East German secret police — reveal that the policeman who shot Ohnesorg, Karl-Heinz Kurras, could in fact have been a spy for East Germany’s communist regime.
In an article that will appear in late May in Deutschlandarchiv, a periodical dedicated to the ongoing project of German reunification, Helmut Müller-Enbergs and Cornelia Jabs reveal that documents they found in the Stasi papers show that Kurras began working together with the Stasi in 1955. He had wanted to move to East Berlin to work for the East German police. Instead, he signed an agreement with the Stasi to remain with the West Berlin police force and spy for the communist state.
As a result of the new information, criminal charges have once again been filed against Kurras, who was acquitted twice, once in 1967 and again in 1970, of negligent homicide charges related to Ohnesorg’s death. Kurras told the Berlin paper Tagesspiegel on Friday that he had never worked together with the Stasi.
But in addition to finding the agreement between Kurras and the Stasi, the two researchers also discovered numerous documents indicating that the East Germans were pleased with the information Kurras passed along — particularly given that he was posted to a division responsible for rooting out moles within the West German police force.
Immediately after Ohnesorg’s death, Kurras received a Stasi communication ordering him to destroy his records and to “cease activities for the moment.” Kurras responded with his acquiescence and wrote “I need money for an attorney.”
The exact circumstances surrounding the death of Ohnesorg have never been completely clarified. Kurras himself, now 81, gave conflicting versions of the story during the investigation but the official version has long been that Kurras fired in self defense. Many others point to witness accounts whereby the police were beating Ohnesorg when the shot was fired.
It is still unclear how the new evidence might play into history’s understanding of the tragic event. The day was one full of violence, with demonstrators and police battling each other with pipes, wooden clubs and stones. Police were further incited by rumors that an officer had been stabbed earlier in the evening. Ohnesorg himself, however, was not directly involved in the violence.
West Berlin in the 1960s and 70s became a focal point of German left wing radicalism. The city had long been left-leaning, and the fact that Berliners were exempt from military service meant that it became a magnate for pacifists and anti-state activists.
Ohnesorg’s death gave them an immediate rallying cry. As the left-wing movement became more radical, many justified their violent activities by pointing to the police brutality that led to the student’s death. A letter written by Ulrike Meinhof announcing the founding of the Red Army Faction, which appeared in SPIEGEL in the fall of 1967, explicitly mentioned the Ohnesorg incident. The RAF went on to terrorize Germany for decades, ultimately killing over 30 people across the country. The radical “June 2 Movement” used the date of the incident in its name.
Kurras, for his part, seems to have been a highly valued Stasi agent. In his files, it is noted that “he is prepared to complete any task assigned to him.” It also mentions that he is notable for having the “courage and temerity necessary to accomplish difficult missions.”

Now it seems the STASI is back again in business after transforming it in to the CYBER-STASI of the 21st Century.

The serial betrayer and cyberstalker Klaus Maurischat is on the run again. The latest action against him (see below) cause him to react in a series of fake statements and “press releases” – one more absurd than the other. Insider analyze that his criminal organisation “GoMoPa” is about to fade away.

On our request the German criminal police (Kriminalpolizei) has opened new cases against the notorious “GoMoPa” organisation which already fled in the underground. Insiders say they have killed German journalist and watchdog Heinz Gerlach and their criminal record is bigger than the Encyclopedia – Britannica

The case is also directed against Google, Germany, whilst supporting criminal action of “GoMoPa” for years and therefore give them the chance to blackmail successfull businessman. This case is therefore an example and will be followed by many others as far as we can project. Furthermore we will bring the case to the attention of the German lawyers community which will not tolerate such misconduct by Googles German legal representative Dr. Arndt Haller and we will bring the case to the attention ofGoogle Inc in Mountain View, USA, and the American ministry of Justice to stop the Cyberstalkers once and for all.
Besides that many legal institutions, individuals and firms have already contacted us to help to clarify the death of Mr. Heinz Gerlach and to prosecute his murderers and their backers.
The case number is ST/0148943/2011

In a series of interviews beginning 11 months before the sudden death of German watchdog Heinz Gerlach Berlin lawyer Joschen Resch unveilved secrets of Gerlach, insiders say. Secret documents from Mr Gerlachs computer were published on two dubious hostile German websites. Both have a lot of similarities in their internet registration. One the notorious “GoMoPa” website belongs to a n Eastern German organization which calls itself “
Numerous attempts have been made to stop our research and the publication of the stories by “GoMoPa” members in camouflage thus confirming the truth and the substance of it in a superior way.
Only two articles let the German audience believe that the famous journalist and watchdog Heinz Gerlach died on natural courses by blood pollution. The first one, published only hours after the death of Mr Heinz Gerlach by the notorious “GoMoPa” (see article below) and a second 3 days later by a small German local newspaper, Weserbergland Nachrichten.

Many people including the hostile Gerlach website “Akte Heinz Gerlach” doubted that this man who had so many enemies and friends would die of natural causes without any previous warning. Rumours occured that Mr. Gerlach’s doctor doubted natural courses at all. After many critical voices discussed the issue a small website of a small German local newspaper – which never before had reported about Mr. Heinz Gerlach and which is not even in the region of Mr Gerlachs home – published that Mr Gerlach died of blood pollution. Weserbergland-Nachrichten published a long article about the deadly consequences of blood pollution and did not even name the source of such an important statement. It claimed only that somebody of Gerlachs inner circle had said this. It is a proven fact that after the collpase of the Eastern German Communist Regime many former Communist propaganda agents went to regional newspapers – often in Western Germany like Günther Schabowski did the man who opened the “Mauer”.

The theatre stage was set: One day later the hostile Gerlach website “Akte Heinz Gerlach” took the agenda publishing that Mr Gerlach had died for natural causes without any further research at all.

This was done by a website which for months and months and months reported everything about Mr. Gerlach.
Furthermore a research proves that the technical details regarding the website hosting of this hostile website “Akte Heinz Gerlach” proves that there are common details with the hosting of “GoMoPa” and their affiliates as proven by the SJB-GoMoPa-victims (see http://www.sjb-fonds-opfer.com)

Insiders believe that the murderers of Mr. Heinz Gerlach are former members of the Eastern German Terror Organisation “Stasi” with dioxins. They also believe that “GoMoPa” was part of the plot. At “GoMoPa”’ a person named Siegfried Siewers was officialy responsible for the press but never appeared in public. “GoMoPa”-victims say that this name was a cameo for “GoMoPa” frontrunner Klaus Maurischat who is controlled by the Stasi Top Agent Ehrenfried Stelznr, Berlin.

Siegfried Sievers, a former Stasi member is responsible for the pollution of millions Germanys for many years with dioxins. This was unveiled at 5th of January 2011 by German prosecutors.
The victims say that Maurischat (probably also a Stasi cameo) and Sievers were in contact as Sievers acted as Stasi Agent and was in fact already a specialist in dioxins under the Communist Terror

The Stasi murder:
„GoMoPa“ & Backers: Blackmailing, Extortion, Racketeering, Internet Murder and Murder. These are the weapons of the East-German “NACHRICHTENDIENST” “GoMoPa”, a renegate confesses.
Deep Throat, Berlin; confesses: „Since months the „GoMoPa“ keyfigures like Klaus-Dieter Maurischat< are in hide-aways because the German police is hunting them for the wirecard fraud and a lot of other criminal actions. I left the group when I noticed that. The found and former Stasi-Colonel Ehrenfried Stelzer died under strange circumstances in Berlin. This has been told to us. But it is also possible that his death was staged. In any case the criminal organization of “GoMoPa” is responsible for the murder of Heinz Gerlach by dioxin. Now my life is also in danger that is why I hide myself.”
According to Deep Throat, Hans J. the murder was done with the help of the old Stasi-connections of the “NACHRICHTENDIENST” “GoMoPa”.
The renegate says that computer hacker Thomas Promny and Sven Schmidt are responsible for the computer crimes and he states that the crime organization of “GoMoPa” has also helpers inside internet companies like Go-Daddy, Media-on and even in Google, Hamburg..

THE “NACHRICHTENDIENST”:New criminal police action against “GoMoPa”:

German criminal police (Kriminalpolizei) has opened new cases against the notorious “GoMoPa” organisation which already fled in the underground.

On our request the German criminal police (Kriminalpolizei) has opened new cases against the notorious “GoMoPa” organisation which already fled in the underground. Insiders say they have killed German journalist and watchdog Heinz Gerlach and their criminal record is bigger than the
Encyclopedia – Britannica

The case is also directed against Google, Germany, whilst supporting criminal action of “GoMoPa” for years and therefore give them the chance to blackmail successfull businessman. This case is therefore an example and will be followed by many others as far as we can project. Furthermore we will bring the case to the attention of the German lawyers community which will not tolerate such misconduct by Googles German legal representative Dr. Arndt Haller and we will bring the case to the attention of Google Inc in Mountain View, USA, and the American ministry of Justice to stop the Cyberstalkers once and for all.

Besides that many legal institutions, individuals and firms have already contacted us to help to clarify the death of Mr. Heinz Gerlach and to prosecute his murderers and their backers.

The case number is

ST/0148943/2011

Stasi-Dioxin: The “NACHRICHTENDIENST”  searching for the perfect murder:

Viktor Yushchenko was running against Prime Minister Viktor Yanukovych. Yanukovych was a political ally of outgoing president Leonid Kuchma. Kuchma’s administration depended upon corruption and dishonesty for its power. Government officials ruled with a sense of terror rather than justice. For the powerful and wealthy few, having Yanukovych elected president was important. Should Yushchenko win, Ukraine’s government was sure to topple. Yushchenko’s campaign promises included a better quality of life for Ukrainians through democracy. His wife, Katherine, told CBS in a 2005 interview, “He was a great threat to the old system, where there was a great deal of corruption, where people were making millions, if not billions.”
On September 6, 2004, Yushchenko became ill after dining with leaders of the Ukrainian secret police. Unlike other social or political engagements, this dinner did not include anyone else on Yushchenko’s team. No precautions were taken regarding the food. Within hours after the dinner, Yushchenko began vomiting violently. His face became paralyzed; he could not speak or read. He developed a severe stomachache and backache as well as gastrointestinal pain. Outwardly, Yushchenko developed what is known as chloracne, a serious skin condition that leaves the face scarred and disfigured.
By December 2004, doctors had determined that Yushchenko had been the victim of dioxin poisoning. Dioxin is a name given to a group of related toxins that can cause cancer and even death. Dioxin was used in the biochemical weapon called Agent Orange during the Vietnam War controversial war in which the United States aidedSouth Vietnam in its fight against a takeover by Communist North Vietnam). Yushchenko had a dioxin level six thousand times greater than that normally found in the bloodstream. His is the second-highest level ever recorded.
Yushchenko immediately suspected he had been poisoned, though Kuchma’s camp passionately denied such allegations. Instead, when Yushchenko showed up at a parliamentary meeting shortly after the poisoning incident, Kuchma’s men teased him, saying he must have had too much to drink or was out too late the night before.
Dioxin can stay in the body for up to thirty-five years. Experts predict that his swelling and scars will fade but never completely disappear. John Henry, a toxicologist at London’s Imperial Hospital, told RedNova.com, “It’ll be a couple of years, and he will always be a bit pockmarked. After damage as heavy as that, I think he will not return to his film star looks.” And Yushchenko will live with the constant threat of cancer.
At first it was believed the poison must have come from a Russian laboratory. Russia was a strong supporter of Kuchma and lobbied against Yushchenko in the 2004 election. But by July 2005, Yushchenko’s security forces were able to trace the poison to a lab in Ukraine. Though not entirely ruling out Russia’s involvement, Yushchenko is quoted on his Web site as saying “I’m sure that even though some people are running from the investigation, we will get them. I am not afraid of anything or anybody.”

Evidence shows that such a perfect murder plotted by former Stasi agents is the cause of the death of German watchdog and journalist Heinz Gerlach.

The Ministry for State Security (German: Ministerium für Staatssicherheit (MfS), commonly known as the Stasi (IPA: [‘?tazi?]) (abbreviation German: Staatssicherheit, literally State Security), was the official state security service of East Germany. The MfS was headquartered in East Berlin, with an extensive complex in Berlin-Lichtenberg and several smaller facilities throughout the city. It was widely regarded as one of the most effective and repressive intelligence and secret police agencies in the world. The MfS motto was “Schild und Schwert der Partei” (Shield and Sword of the Party), that is the ruling Socialist Unity Party of Germany (SED).

According to the confessions of an informer, Berlin lawyer Jochen Resch writes most of the “articles” of the communist “STASI” agency “GoMoPa” himself or it is done by lawyers of his firm. The whistleblower states that lawyer Resch is the mastermind behind the “CYBER-STASI” called “NACHRICHTENDIENST” “GoMoPa”. Bizarre enough they use Jewish names of non-existing Jewish lawyers by the name of “Goldman, Morgenstern and Partner” to stage their bogus “firm”.  Further involved in their complots are a “detective” Medard Fuchsgruber and “STASI”-Colonel Ehrenfried Stelzer, “the first crime expert” in the former communist East-Germany.
According to London based Meridian Capital hundreds and thousands of wealthy people and companies have paid to the “NACHRICHTENDIENST” to avoid their cyberstalking (see article below).
Finally the German criminal police started their investigations (case number ST/0148943/2011).
The “NACHRICHTENDIENST” is also involved in the death of the well-known German watchdog and journalist Heinz Gerlach who died under strange circumstances in July 2010.
Only hours after his death the “NACHRICHTENDIENST” was spreading the news that Mr Gerlach died of blood pollution and set the stage for a fairy tale. Months before his death the “NACHRICHTENDIENST” started a campaign to ruin his reputation and presumably was also responsable for cyberattacks to bring his website down. In fact they presumably used the same tactics also against our servers. Therefore we investigated all internet details of them and handed the facts to the FBI and international authorities.

Story background:
Now it seems the STASI is back again in business after transforming it in to the CYBER-STASI of the 21st Century.

The serial betrayer and  cyberstalker Klaus Maurischat is on the run again. The latest action against him (see below) cause him to react in a series of fake statements and “press releases” – one more absurd than the other. Insider analyze that his criminal organisation “GoMoPa” is about to fade away.
On our request the German criminal police (Kriminalpolizei) has opened new cases against the notorious “GoMoPa” organisation which already fled in the underground. Insiders  say they  have killed German journalist and watchdog Heinz Gerlach and their criminal record is bigger than the Encyclopedia – Britannica
The case is also directed against Google, Germany, whilst supporting criminal action of  “GoMoPa” for years and therefore give them the chance to blackmail successfull businessman. This case is therefore an example and will be followed by many others as far as we can project. Furthermore we will bring the case to the attention of the German lawyers community which will not tolerate such misconduct by Googles German legal representative Dr. Arndt Haller and we will bring the case to the attention of Google Inc in Mountain View, USA, and the American ministry of Justice to stop the Cyberstalkers once and for all.
Besides that many legal institutions,  individuals and firms have already contacted us to help to clarify the death of Mr. Heinz Gerlach and to prosecute his murderers and their backers.
The case number is ST/0148943/2011
In a series of interviews beginning 11 months before the sudden death of German watchdog Heinz Gerlach Berlin lawyer Joschen Resch unveilved secrets of Gerlach, insiders say. Secret documents from Mr Gerlachs computer were published on two dubious hostile German websites. Both have a lot of similarities in their internet registration. One the notorious “GoMoPa” website belongs to a n Eastern German organization which calls itself “
Numerous attempts have been made to stop our research and the publication of the stories by “GoMoPa” members in camouflage thus confirming the truth and the substance of it in a superior way.
Only two articles let the German audience believe that the famous journalist and watchdog Heinz Gerlach died on natural courses by blood pollution. The first one, published only hours after the death of Mr Heinz Gerlach by the notorious “GoMoPa” (see article below) and a second 3 days later by a small German local newspaper, Weserbergland Nachrichten.

Many people including the hostile Gerlach website “Akte Heinz Gerlach” doubted that this man who had so many enemies and friends would die of natural causes without any previous warning. Rumours occured that Mr. Gerlach’s doctor doubted natural courses at all. After many critical voices discussed the issue a small website of a small German local newspaper – which never before had reported about Mr. Heinz Gerlach and which is not even in the region of Mr Gerlachs home – published that Mr Gerlach died of blood pollution. Weserbergland-Nachrichten published a long article about the deadly consequences of blood pollution and did not even name the source of such an important statement. It claimed only that somebody of Gerlachs inner circle had said this. It is a proven fact that after the collpase of the Eastern German Communist Regime many former Communist propaganda agents went to regional newspapers – often in Western Germany like Günther Schabowski did the man who opened the “Mauer”.

The theatre stage was set: One day later the hostile Gerlach website “Akte Heinz Gerlach” took the agenda publishing that Mr Gerlach had died for natural causes without any further research at all.

This was done by a website which for months and months and months reported everything about Mr. Gerlach.
Furthermore a research proves that the technical details regarding the website hosting of this hostile website “Akte Heinz Gerlach” proves that there are common details with the hosting of “GoMoPa” and their affiliates as proven by the SJB-GoMoPa-victims (see http://www.sjb-fonds-opfer.com)
Insiders believe that the murderers of Mr. Heinz Gerlach are former members of the Eastern German Terror Organisation “Stasi” with dioxins. They also believe that “GoMoPa” was part of the plot. At “GoMoPa”’ a person named Siegfried Siewers was officialy responsible for the press but never appeared in public. “GoMoPa”-victims say that this name was a cameo for “GoMoPa” frontrunner Klaus Maurischat who is controlled by the Stasi Top Agent Ehrenfried Stelzner, Berlin.

Siegfried Sievers, a former Stasi member is responsible for the pollution of millions Germanys for many years with dioxins. This was unveiled at 5th of January 2011 by German prosecutors.
The victims say that Maurischat (probably also a Stasi cameo) and Sievers were in contact as Sievers acted as Stasi Agent and was in fact already a specialist in dioxins under the Communist Terror Regime in Eastern Germany.
Furthermore the Stasi Top Agent Ehrenfried Stelzer disguised as Professor for Criminal studies during the Communist Regime at the Eastern Berlin Humboldt University.

Background:
The man behind the Berlin lawyer Jochen Resch and his activities is Ehrenfried Stelzer, former Stasi Top officer in Berlin and “Professor for Criminal Studies” at the Eastern Berlin Humboldt University during the Communist regime, the SJB-GoMoPa-victims say (www.sjb-fonds-opfer.com) is responsable for the killing of German watchdog and journalist Heinz Gerlach.
These informations stem from various sources who were close to the criminal organization of GoMoPa in the last years. The SJB-GoMoPa say that the well-known German watchdog and journalist Heinz Gerlach was killed by former Stasi members with dioxins. Polychlorinated dibenzodioxins (PCDDs), or simply dioxins, are a group of organic polyhalogenated compounds that are significant because they act as environmental pollutants. They are commonly referred to as dioxins for simplicity in scientific publications because every PCDD molecule contains a dioxin skeletal structure. Typically, the p-dioxin skeleton is at the core of a PCDD molecule, giving the molecule a dibenzo-p-dioxin ring system. Members of the PCDD family have been shown to bioaccumulate in humans and wildlife due to their lipophilic properties, and are known teratogens, mutagens, and confirmed (avered) human carcinogens. They are organic compounds.
Dioxins build up primarily in fatty tissues over time (bioaccumulate), so even small exposures may eventually reach dangerous levels. In 1994, the US EPA reported that dioxins are a probable carcinogen, but noted that non-cancer effects (reproduction and sexual development, immune system) may pose an even greater threat to human health. TCDD, the most toxic of the dibenzodioxins, is classified as a Group 1 carcinogen by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC).
In 2004, a notable individual case of dioxin poisoning, Ukrainian politician Viktor Yushchenko was exposed to the second-largest measured dose of dioxins, according to the reports of the physicians responsible for diagnosing him. This is the first known case of a single high dose of TCDD dioxin poisoning, and was diagnosed only after a toxicologist recognized the symptoms of chloracne while viewing television news coverage of his condition.
German dioxin scandal: In January 2011 about 4700 German farms were banned from making deliveries after tests at the Harles und Jentzsch plant in the state of Schleswig-Holstein showed high levels of dioxin. Again this incident appears to involve PCBs and not PCDDs at all. Dioxin were found in animal feed and eggs in many farms. The person who is responsible for this, Siegfried Sievert is also a former Stasi Agent. At “GoMoPa” the notorious Eastern-Berlin press agency (see article below) one of the henchmen acted under the name of “Siegfried Siewert”.
Further evidence for the killing of Mr.Heinz Gerlach is provided by the SJB-GoMoPa-victims by analyzing the dubious role of former Stasi-Top-agent Ehrenfried Stelzer, also a former “Professor for Crime Studies” under the Communist regime in Eastern Germany and the dubious role of “detective” Medard Fuchsgruber. Both are closely tied to the dubious “GoMoPa” and Berlin lawyer Jochen Resch.
According to the SJB-GoMoPa-victims is Berlin lawyer Jochen Resch the mastermind of the criminal organization “GoMoPa2. The victims state that they have a source inside “GoMoPa” who helped them discover  the shocking truth. The so-called “Deep Throat from Berlin” has information that Resch had the idea to found the criminal organization “GoMoPa” and use non-existing Jewish lawyers  named Goldman, Morgenstern & Partner as camouflage. Their “office” in Madison Avenue, New York, is a mailbox. This is witnessed by a German Ex-Patriot, a lawyer, whose father, Heinz Gerlach, died under strange circumstances.
Resch seems to use “GoMoPa” as an instrument to blackmail parts of the German Property and Investment section.

-”Worse than the Gestapo.” —Simon Wiesenthal, Nazi hunter said about the notorious “Stasi”.

Less than a month after German demonstrators began to tear down the Berlin Wall on November 9, 1989, irate East German citizens stormed the Leipzig district office of the Ministry for State Security (MfS)—the Stasi, as it was more commonly called. Not a shot was fired, and there was no evidence of “street justice” as Stasi officers surrendered meekly and were peacefully led away. The following month, on January 15, hundreds of citizens sacked Stasi headquarters in Berlin. Again there was no bloodshed. The last bit of unfinished business was accomplished on May 31 when the Stasi radioed its agents in West Germany to fold their tents and come home.
The intelligence department of the Nationale Volksarmee (NVA), the People’s Army, had done the same almost a week earlier, but with what its members thought was better style. Instead of sending the five-digit code groups that it had used for decades to message its spies in West Germany, the army group broadcast a male choir singing a children’s ditty about a duck swimming on a lake. There was no doubt that the singing spymasters had been drowning their sorrow over losing the Cold War in schnapps. The giggling, word-slurring songsters repeated the refrain three times: “Dunk your little head in the water and lift your little tail.” This was the signal to agents under deep cover that it was time to come home.
With extraordinary speed and political resolve, the divided nation was reunified a year later. The collapse of the despotic regime was total. It was a euphoric time for Germans, but reunification also produced a new national dilemma. Nazi war crimes were still being tried in West Germany, forty-six years after World War II. Suddenly the German government was faced with demands that the communist officials who had ordered, executed, and abetted crimes against their own people—crimes that were as brutal as those perpetrated by their Nazi predecessors—also be prosecuted.
The people of the former Deutsche Demokratische Republik (DDR), the German Democratic Republic, as the state had called itself for forty years, were clamoring for instant revenge. Their wrath was directed primarily against the country’s communist rulers—the upper echelon of the Sozialistische Einheitspartei (SED), the Socialist Unity Party. The tens of thousands of second-echelon party functionaries who had enriched themselves at the expense of their cocitizens were also prime targets for retribution.
Particularly singled out were the former members of the Stasi, the East German secret police, who previously had considered themselves the “shield and sword” of the party. When the regime collapsed, the Stasi had 102,000 full-time officers and noncommissioned personnel on its rolls, including 11,000 members of the ministry’s own special guards regiment. Between 1950 and 1989, a total of 274,000 persons served in the Stasi.
The people’s ire was running equally strong against the regular Stasi informers, the inoffizielle Mitarbeiter (IMs). By 1995, 174,000 had been identified as IMs, or 2.5 percent of the total population between the ages of 18 and 60. Researchers were aghast when they found that about 10,000 IMs, or roughly 6 percent of the total, had not yet reached the age of 18. Since many records were destroyed, the exact number of IMs probably will never be determined; but 500,000 was cited as a realistic figure. Former Colonel Rainer Wiegand, who served in the Stasi counterintelligence directorate, estimated that the figure could go as high as 2 million, if occasional stool pigeons were included.
“The Stasi was much, much worse than the Gestapo, if you consider only the oppression of its own people,” according to Simon Wiesenthal of Vienna, Austria, who has been hunting Nazi criminals for half a century. “The Gestapo had 40,000 officials watching a country of 80 million, while the Stasi employed 102,000 to control only 17 million.” One might add that the Nazi terror lasted only twelve years, whereas the Stasi had four decades in which to perfect its machinery of oppression, espionage, and international terrorism and subversion.
To ensure that the people would become and remain submissive, East German communist leaders saturated their realm with more spies than had any other totalitarian government in recent history. The Soviet Union’s KGB employed about 480,000 full-time agents to oversee a nation of 280 million, which means there was one agent per 5,830 citizens. Using Wiesenthal’s figures for the Nazi Gestapo, there was one officer for 2,000 people. The ratio for the Stasi was one secret policeman per 166 East Germans. When the regular informers are added, these ratios become much higher: In the Stasi’s case, there would have been at least one spy watching every 66 citizens! When one adds in the estimated numbers of part-time snoops, the result is nothing short of monstrous: one informer per 6.5 citizens. It would not have been unreasonable to assume that at least one Stasi informer was present in any party of ten or twelve dinner guests.

THE STASI OCTOPUS

Like a giant octopus, the Stasi’s tentacles probed every aspect of life. Full-time officers were posted to all major industrial plants. Without exception, one tenant in every apartment building was designated as a watchdog reporting to an area representative of the Volkspolizei (Vopo), the People’s Police. In turn, the police officer was the Stasi’s man. If a relative or friend came to stay overnight, it was reported. Schools, universities, and hospitals were infiltrated from top to bottom. German academe was shocked to learn that Heinrich Fink, professor of theology and vice chancellor at East Berlin’s Humboldt University, had been a Stasi informer since 1968. After Fink’s Stasi connections came to light, he was summarily fired. Doctors, lawyers, journalists, writers, actors, and sports figures were co-opted by Stasi officers, as were waiters and hotel personnel. Tapping about 100,000 telephone lines in West Germany and West Berlin around the clock was the job of 2,000 officers.
Stasi officers knew no limits and had no shame when it came to “protecting the party and the state.” Churchmen, including high officials of both Protestant and Catholic denominations, were recruited en masse as secret informers. Their offices and confessionals were infested with eavesdropping devices. Even the director of Leipzig’s famous Thomas Church choir, Hans-Joachim Rotch, was forced to resign when he was unmasked as a Spitzel, the people’s pejorative for a Stasi informant.
Absolutely nothing was sacred to the secret police. Tiny holes were bored in apartment and hotel room walls through which Stasi agents filmed their “suspects” with special video cameras. Even bathrooms were penetrated by the communist voyeurs.8 Like the Nazi Gestapo, the Stasi was the sinister side of deutsche Gründlichkeit (German thoroughness).
After the Berlin wall came down, the victims of the DDR regime demanded immediate retribution. Ironically, their demands were countered by their fellow Germans in the West who, living in freedom, had diligently built einen demokratischen Rechtsstaat, a democratic state governed by the rule of law. The challenge of protecting the rights of both the victims and the accused was immense, given the emotions surrounding the issue. Government leaders and democratic politicians recognized that there could be no “quick fix” of communist injustices without jeopardizing the entire system of democratic jurisprudence. Moving too rapidly merely to satisfy the popular thirst for revenge might well have resulted in acquittals or mistrials. Intricate jurisdictional questions needed to be resolved with both alacrity and meticulousness. No German government could afford to allow a perpetrator to go free because of a judicial error. The political fallout from any such occurrence, especially in the East, could prove fatal to whatever political party occupied the chancellor’s office in Bonn at the time.
Politicians and legal scholars of the “old federal states,” or West Germany, counseled patience, pointing out that even the prosecution of Nazi criminals had not yet been completed. Before unification, Germans would speak of Vergangenheitsbewältigung (“coming to grips with the past”) when they discussed dealing with Nazi crimes. In the reunited Germany, this word came to imply the communist past as well. The two were considered comparable especially in the area of human rights violations. Dealing with major Nazi crimes, however, was far less complicated for the Germans: Adolf Hitler and his Gestapo and Schutzstaffel (SS) chief, Heinrich Himmler, killed themselves, as did Luftwaffe chief and Vice Chancellor Hermann Göring, who also had been the first chief of the Gestapo. The victorious Allies prosecuted the rest of the top leadership at the International War Crimes Tribunal in Nürnberg. Twelve were hanged, three received life terms, four were sentenced to lesser terms of imprisonment (up to twenty years), and three were acquitted.
The cases of communist judges and prosecutors accused of Rechtsbeugung (perversion of justice) are more problematic. According to Franco Werkenthin, a Berlin legal expert charged with analyzing communist crimes for the German parliament, those sitting in judgment of many of the accused face a difficult task because of the general failure of German justice after World War II. Not a single judge or prosecutor who served the Nazi regime was brought to account for having perverted justice—even those who had handed down death sentences for infringements that in a democracy would have been considered relatively minor offenses. Werkenthin called this phenomenon die Jauche der Justiz, the cesspool of justice.
Of course, the crimes committed by the communists were not nearly as heinous as the Nazis’ extermination of the Jews, or the mass murders in Nazi-occupied territories. However, the communists’ brutal oppression of the nation by means including murder alongside legal execution put the SED leadership on a par with Hitler’s gang. In that sense, Walter Ulbricht or Erich Honecker (Ulbricht’s successor as the party’s secretary-general and head of state) and secret police chief Erich Mielke can justifiably be compared to Hitler and Himmler, respectively.
Arrest warrants were issued for Honecker and Mielke. The Soviet government engineered Honecker’s escape to Moscow, where he became the ward of Soviet President Mikhail S. Gorbachev. When the Soviet Union crumbled, the new Russian President Boris Yeltsin expelled Honecker. He was arrested on his return to Germany, but a court decided against a trial when he was diagnosed with liver cancer. Honecker flew to Chile with his wife Margot to live with their daughter, a Chilean citizen by marriage. His exile was short, and he died in 1994. Mielke was not so fortunate: His KGB friends turned their backs on him. He was tried in Germany for the 1931 murder of two police officers, found guilty, and sentenced to six years in prison. Other charges, including manslaughter, were dismissed because of his advanced age and poor health.
Three other members of the twenty-one-member ruling Politburo also have been tried. Former Defense Minister Heinz Kessler was convicted of manslaughter in connection with the order to kill people who were trying to escape to the West. He received a seven-and-a-half-year term. Two others, members of the Central Committee and the National Defense Council, were tried with Kessler and sentenced to seven and a half years and five years, respectively. Politburo member Harry Tisch, who was also head of the communist trade union, was found guilty of embezzlement and served eighteen months. Six others, including Egon Krenz (Honecker’s successor as party chief), were charged with manslaughter. Krenz was found guilty, and on August 25, 1997, was sentenced to six and a half years in prison.
However, eight years after reunification, many of the 165 members of the Central Committee have not yet been put under investigation. In 1945, Nazis holding comparable or lesser positions were subject to automatic arrest by the Allies. They spent months or even years in camps while their cases were adjudicated. Moreover, the Nürnberg Tribunal branded the Reich and its Corps of Political Leaders, SS, Security Service (SD), Secret State Police (Gestapo), SA (Storm Troopers), and Armed Forces High Command criminal organizations. Similarly sweeping actions against communist leaders and functionaries such as Stasi officers were never contemplated, even though tens of thousands of political trials and human rights abuses have been documented. After the East German regime fell, German judicial authorities scrupulously avoided the appearance of waging witch-hunts or using the law as a weapon of vengeance. Prosecutors and judges made great efforts to be fair, often suspending legal action while requesting rulings from the supreme court on possible constitutional conflicts.
The victims of oppression clamored for revenge and demanded speedy prosecution of the erstwhile tyrants. They had little patience for a judicial system that was handicapped by a lack of unblemished and experienced criminal investigators, prosecutors, and judges. Despite these handicaps, the Berlin Central Police Investigations Group for Government Criminality, mindful that the statute of limitations for most communist crimes would expire at the end of 1999, made significant progress under its director Manfred Kittlaus, the able former director of the West Berlin state police. Kittlaus’s major task in 1998 was to investigate wrongful deaths, including 73 murders, 30 attempted murders, 583 cases of manslaughter, 2,938 instances of attempted manslaughter, and 425 other suspicious deaths. Of the 73 murders, 22 were classified as contract murders.
One of those tried and convicted for attempted contract murder was former Stasi collaborator Peter Haak, who was sentenced to six and a half years in prison. The fifty-two-year-old Haak took part in the Stasi’s 1981 Operation Scorpion, which was designed to pursue people who helped East Germans escape to the West. Proceedings against former General Gerhard Neiber, whose Stasi directorate was responsible for preventing escapes and for wreaking vengeance, were still pending in 1998.
Peter Haak’s murder plot was hatched after he befriended Wolfgang Welsch and his family. Welsch was a thorn in the side of the Stasi because of his success in smuggling people out of the DDR. Haak joined Welsch and the latter’s wife and seven-year-old daughter on a vacation in Israel, where he mixed a gram of thallium, a highly poisonous metallic chemical element used in rat poison, into the hamburgers he was preparing for a meal. Welsch’s wife and daughter vomited immediately after ingesting the poison and recovered quickly. Welsch suffered severe aftereffects, but eventually recovered: He had consumed a large amount of beer with the meal, and an expert testified that the alcohol had probably flushed the poison from his system.
Berlin Prosecutor General Christoph Schäfgen revealed that after the DDR’s demise 15,200 investigations had been launched, of which more than 9,000 were still active at the beginning of 1995. Indictments were handed down in 153 cases, and 73 perpetrators were convicted. Among those convicted were the aforementioned Politburo members as well as a number of border guards who had killed people who were trying to escape to the West.
Despite widespread misgivings about the judicial failures in connection with some Nazi crimes, a number of judges and prosecutors were convicted and jailed for up to three years for perversion of justice. In collusion with the Stasi, they had requested or handed down more severe sentences in political cases so that the state could collect greater amounts when the “convicts” were ransomed by the West German government. {The amount of ransom paid was governed by the time a prisoner had been sentenced to serve.)
The enormity of the task facing judicial authorities in reunified Germany becomes starkly evident when one examines the actions they have taken in all five former East German provinces and in East Berlin. From the end of 1990 to July 1996, 52,050 probes were launched into charges of murder, attempted murder, manslaughter, kidnapping, election fraud, and perversion of justice. A total of 29,557 investigations were halted for various reasons including death, severe illness, old age, or insufficient evidence. In those five and a half years, there were only 139 convictions.
The problem is even more staggering when cases of espionage are included. Between 1990 and 1996, the office of the federal prosecutor general launched 6,641 probes, of which 2,431 were terminated before trial—most due to the statute of limitations. Of 175 indictments on charges of espionage, 95 resulted in convictions. In addition to the cases handled at the federal level, the prosecutor general referred 3,926 investigations to state authorities, who terminated 3,344 without trial. State courts conducted 356 trials, resulting in 248 convictions. Because the statute of limitations for espionage is five years, the prosecutor general’s office told me in 1997 it was unlikely that more espionage trials would be conducted.
It is important to emphasize the difference between the statute’s application to so-called government crimes committed in East Germany before the collapse and to crimes, such as espionage, committed in West Germany. The Unification Treaty specifically permits the belated prosecution of individuals who committed acts that were punishable under the East German criminal code and who due to official connivance were not prosecuted earlier. There is no statute of limitations for murder. For most other crimes the limit is five years; however, due to the obstacles created by previous government connivance, the German parliament in 1993 doubled this time limit for prosecution of the more serious crimes. At the same time, the parliament decreed that all cases must be adjudicated by the end of 2002. For less serious offenses, the statute would have run out on December 31, 1997, but the parliament extended it to 2000.
A number of politicians, jurists, and liberal journalists pleaded for a general amnesty for crimes committed by former DDR leaders and Communist Party functionaries. A former West German supreme court judge, Ernst Mahrenholz, said the “sharp sword of justice prevents reconciliation.” Schäfgen, the Berlin prosecutor general, had this answer for the former high court judge and other amnesty advocates:

I cannot agree. We are raising no special, sharp sword against East Germans. We must pursue state-sponsored injustice in exactly the same manner as we do when a thief steals or when one human being kills another. If one wants to change that, then we would have to do away with the entire criminal justice system, because punishment always hurts. We are not criminalizing an entire people but only an ever shrinking, small portion.

German Foreign Minister Klaus Kinkel, who was West Germany’s minister of justice when the nation was unified, said this at a session of parliament in September 1991: “We must punish the perpetrators. This is not a matter of a victor’s justice. We owe it to the ideal of justice and to the victims. All of those who ordered injustices and those who executed the orders must be punished; the top men of the SED as well as the ones who shot [people] at the wall.” Aware that the feelings against communists were running high among their victims, Kinkel pointed to past revolutions after which the representatives of the old system were collectively liquidated. In the same speech before parliament, he said:

Such methods are alien to a state ruled by law. Violence and vengeance are incompatible with the law in any case. At the same time, we cannot tolerate that the problems are swept under the rug as a way of dealing with a horrible past, because the results will later be disastrous for society. We Germans know from our own experience where this leads. Jewish philosophy formulates it in this way: “The secret of redemption is called remembering.”

Defense attorneys for communist officials have maintained that the difficulty lies in the fact that hundreds of thousands of political opponents were tried under laws of the DDR. Although these laws were designed to smother political dissent and grossly violated basic human rights and democratic norms, they were nonetheless laws promulgated by a sovereign state. How could one justly try individual Stasi officers, prosecutors, and judges who had simply been fulfilling their legal responsibility to pursue and punish violators of the law?
Opinions varied widely on whether and how the Stasi and other perpetrators of state-sponsored crimes should be tried. Did the laws of the DDR, as they existed before reunification, still apply in the east? Or was the criminal code of the western part of the country the proper instrument of justice in reunified Germany? However, these questions were moot: As Rupert Scholz, professor of law at the University of Munich and a Christian Democratic member of parliament, pointed out, the Unification Treaty specifies that the penal code of the DDR and not that of the Federal Republic of Germany (FRG) shall be applied to offenses committed in East Germany. Scholz’s view was upheld by the Bundesverfassungsgericht, the supreme court. Most offenses committed by party functionaries and Stasi officers—murder, kidnapping, torture, illegal wiretapping, mail robbery, and fraud—were subject to prosecution in reunified Germany under the DDR’s penal code. But this would not satisfy the tens of thousands of citizens who had been sent to prison under East German laws covering purely political offenses for which there was no West German equivalent.
Nevertheless, said Scholz, judicial authorities were by no means hamstrung, because West Germany had never recognized the East German state according to international law. “We have always said that we are one nation; that the division of Germany led neither to full recognition under international law nor, concomitantly, to a recognition of the legal system of the DDR,” Scholz said. Accordingly, West German courts have consistently maintained that West German law protects all Germans equally, including those living in the East. Therefore, no matter where the crimes were committed, whether in the East or the West, all Germans have always been subject to West German laws. Applying this logic, East German border guards who had either killed or wounded persons trying to escape to the West could be tried under the jurisdiction of West Germany.
The “one nation” principle was not upheld by the German supreme court. Prior to the court’s decision, however, Colonel General Markus Wolf, chief of the Stasi’s foreign espionage directorate, and some of his officers who personally controlled agents from East Berlin had been tried for treason and convicted. Wolf had been sentenced to six years in prison. The supreme court ruling overturned that verdict and those imposed on Wolf’s cohorts, even though they had obtained the most closely held West German secrets and handed them over to the KGB. The maximum penalty for Landesverrat, or treason, is life imprisonment. In vacating Wolf’s sentence, the court said he could not be convicted because he operated only from East German territory and under East German law.
However, Wolf was reindicted on charges of kidnapping and causing bodily harm, crimes also punishable under East German law. The former Stasi three-star general, on March 24, 1955, had approved in writing a plan to kidnap a woman who worked for the U.S. mission in West Berlin. The woman and her mother were tricked by a Stasi agent whom the woman had been teaching English, and voluntarily got into his car. He drove them into the Soviet sector of the divided city, where they were seized by Stasi officers. The woman was subjected to psychological torture and threatened with imprisonment unless she signed an agreement to spy for the Stasi. She agreed. On her return to the American sector, however, the woman reported the incident to security officials. Wolf had committed a felony punishable by up to fifteen years’ imprisonment in West Germany. He was found guilty in March 1977 and sentenced to two years’ probation.
Those who have challenged the application of the statute of limitations to communist crimes, especially to the executions of citizens fleeing to the West, have drawn parallels to the notorious executive orders of Adolf Hitler. Hitler issued orders mandating the summary execution of Soviet Army political commissars upon their capture and initiating the extermination of Jews. An early postwar judicial decision held that these orders were equivalent to law. When that law was declared illegal and retroactively repealed by the West German Bundestag, the statute of limitations was suspended—that is, it never took effect. Many of those convicted in subsequent trials of carrying out the Führer’s orders were executed by the Allies. The German supreme court has ruled the same way as the Bundestag on the order to shoot people trying to escape to West Germany, making the statute of limitations inapplicable to such cases. The ruling made possible the trial of members of the National Defense Council who took part in formulating or promulgating the order. A number of border guards who had shot would-be escapees also have been tried and convicted.
Chief Prosecutor Heiner Sauer, former head of the West German Central Registration Office for Political Crimes, was particularly concerned with the border shootings. His office, located in Salzgitter, West Germany, was established in 1961 as a direct consequence of the Berlin Wall, which was erected on August 13 of that year. Willy Brandt, at the time the city’s mayor (later federal chancellor) had decided that crimes committed by East German border guards should be recorded. At his behest, a central registry of all shootings and other serious border incidents was instituted. Between August 13, 1961 and the opening of the borders on November 9, 1989, 186 border killings were registered. But when the Stasi archives were opened, investigators found that at least 825 people had paid with their lives for trying to escape to the West. This figure was reported to the court that was trying former members of the National Defense Council. In addition to these border incidents, the registry also had recorded a number of similar political offenses committed in the interior of the DDR: By fall 1991, Sauer’s office had registered 4,444 cases of actual or attempted killings and about 40,000 sentences handed down by DDR courts for “political offenses.”
During the early years of Sauer’s operation, the details of political prosecutions became known only when victims were ransomed by West Germany or were expelled. Between 1963 and 1989, West Germany paid DM5 billion (nearly US$3 billion) to the communist regime for the release of 34,000 political prisoners. The price per head varied according to the importance of the person or the length of the sentence. In some cases the ransom amounted to more than US$56,000. The highest sum ever paid to the East Germans appears to have been DM450,000 (US$264,705 using an exchange rate of US$1.70 to the mark). The ransom “object” in this case was Count Benedikt von Hoensbroech. A student in his early twenties, von Hoensbroech was attending a West Berlin university when the wall went up. He was caught by the Stasi while trying to help people escape and was sentenced to ten years at hard labor. The case attracted international attention because his family was related to Queen Fabiola of Belgium, who interceded with the East Germans. Smelling money, the East German government first demanded the equivalent of more than US$1 million from the young man’s father as ransom. In the end, the parties settled on the figure of DM450,000, of which the West German government paid DM40,000 (about $23,529). Such ransom operations were fully controlled by the Stasi.
Political prisoners released in the DDR could not be registered by the West Germans because their cases remained secret. The victims were admonished to keep quiet or face another prison term. Nonetheless, in the first year after reunification, Sauer’s office added another 20,000 documented cases, for a total of 60,000. Sauer said he believed the final figure of all political prosecutions would be somewhere around 300,000. In every case, the Stasi was involved either in the initial arrest or in pretrial interrogations during which “confessions” were usually extracted by physical or psychological torture, particularly between the mid-1940s and the mid-1960s.
Until 1987, the DDR imposed the death penalty for a number of capital crimes, including murder, espionage, and economic offenses. But after the mid-1950s, nearly all death sentences were kept quiet and executions were carried out in the strictest secrecy, initially by guillotine and in later years by a single pistol shot to the neck. In most instances, the relatives of those killed were not informed either of the sentence or of the execution. The corpses were cremated and the ashes buried secretly, sometimes at construction sites. In reporting about one executioner who shot more than twenty persons to death, the Berlin newspaper Bildzeitung said that a total of 170 civilians had been executed in East Germany. However, Franco Werkenthin, the Berlin official investigating DDR crimes, said he had documented at least three hundred executions. He declined to say how many were for political offenses, because he had not yet submitted his report to parliament. “But it was substantial,” he told me. The true number of executions may never be known because no complete record of death sentences meted out by civil courts could be found. Other death sentences were handed down by military courts, and many records of those are also missing. In addition, German historian Günther Buch believes that about two hundred members of the Stasi itself were executed for various crimes, including attempts to escape to the West.

SAFEGUARDING HUMAN DIGNITY?

The preamble to the East German criminal code stated that the purpose of the code was to “safeguard the dignity of humankind, its freedom and rights under the aegis of the criminal code of the socialist state,” and that “a person can be prosecuted under the criminal code only in strictest concurrence with the law.” However, many of the codified offenses for which East German citizens were prosecuted and imprisoned were unique to totalitarian regimes, both fascist and communist.
Moreover, certain sections of the code, such as those on “Treasonable Relaying of Information” and “Treasonable Agent Activity,” were perversely applied, landing countless East Germans in maximum security penitentiaries. The victims of this perversion of justice usually were persons who had requested legal exit permits from the DDR authorities and had been turned down. In many cases, their “crime” was having contacted a Western consulate to inquire about immigration procedures. Sentences of up to two and a half years’ hard labor were not unusual as punishment for such inquiries.
Engaging in “propaganda hostile to the state” was another punishable offense. In one such case, a young man was arrested and prosecuted for saying that it was not necessary to station tanks at the border and for referring to border fortifications as “nonsense.” During his trial, he “admitted” to owning a television set on which he watched West German programs and later told friends what he saw. One of those “friends” had denounced him to the Stasi. The judge considered the accused’s actions especially egregious and sentenced him to a year and a half at hard labor.
Ironically, another part of this section of the criminal code decreed that “glorifying militarism” also was a punishable offense, although the DDR itself “glorified” its People’s Army beyond any Western norm. That army was clad in uniforms and insignia identical to those of the Nazi Wehrmacht, albeit without eagles and swastikas. The helmets, too, were differently shaped, but the Prussian goose step was regulation during parades.
A nineteen-year-old who had placed a sign in an apartment window reading “When justice is turned into injustice, resistance becomes an obligation!” was rewarded with twenty-two months in the penitentiary. Earlier, the youth had applied for an exit visa and had been turned down. A thirty-four-year-old father of two who also had been denied permission to leave the “workers’ and peasants’ state” with his family similarly advertised that fact with a poster reading “We want to leave, but they won’t let us.” The man went to prison for sixteen months. The “crimes” of both men were covered by a law on “Interference in Activities of the State or Society.”
Two letters—one to a friend in West Germany, seeking assistance to legally emigrate to the West, and another containing a similar appeal to Chief of State Honecker—brought a four-year sentence to their writer, who was convicted under two laws: those on “establishing illegal contacts” (writing to his friend) and on “public denigration” (writing to Honecker). The Stasi had illegally intercepted both letters.
The East German party chiefs were not content to rely only on the Stasi’s millions of informers to ferret out antistate sentiments. Leaving nothing to chance, they created a law that made the failure to denounce fellow citizens a crime punishable by up to five years’ imprisonment. One man was sentenced to twenty-three months for failing to report that a friend of his was preparing to escape to the West. The mandatory denunciation law had its roots in the statutes of the Socialist Unity Party, which were published in the form of a little red booklet. I picked up a copy of this booklet that had been discarded by its previous owner, a Stasi chauffeur, who had written “Ha, Ha” next to the mandate to “report any misdeeds, regardless of the person responsible, to leading party organs, all the way up to the Central Committee.”
Rupert Scholz, member of parliament and professor of law at the University of Munich, said many East Germans feel there is little determination among their Western brethren to bring the Stasi criminals to trial. “In fact, we already have heard many of them say that the peaceful revolution should have been a bloody one instead so they could have done away with their tormentors by hanging them posthaste,” Scholz told me.
The Reverend Joachim Gauck, minister to a Lutheran parish in East Germany, shared the people’s pessimism that justice would be done. Following reunification, Gauck was appointed by the Bonn government as its special representative for safeguarding and maintaining the Stasi archives. “We must at least establish a legal basis for finding the culprits in our files,” Gauck told me. “But it will not be easy. If you stood the millions of files upright in one line, they would stretch for 202 kilometers [about 121 miles]. In those files you can find an unbelievable number of Stasi victims and their tormentors.”
Gauck was given the mandate he needed in November 1991, when the German parliament passed a law authorizing file searches to uncover Stasi perpetrators and their informants. He viewed this legislation as first step in the right direction. With the evidence from Stasi files, the perpetrators could be removed from their public service jobs without any formal legal proceedings. Said Gauck: “We needed this law badly. It is not reasonable that persons who served this apparatus of oppression remain in positions of trust.”

See more at the journalist Bernd Pulch website http://www.berndpulch.org

DOWNLAOD THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT HERE

terroranleitung_mfs1

DOWNLOAD ORGINAL STASI FILE HERE

terroranleitung_mfs1

Joachim Gauck (born 24 January 1940; pronounced [ˈɡaʊ̯k]) is a German politician, Protestant pastor, and former anti-communist human rights activist in East Germany. On 19 February 2012, he was nominated as the joint candidate for President of Germany by the government parties CDU, CSU and FDP, and the opposition SPD and the Alliance ’90/The Greens.[1]

During the Revolutions of 1989, he was a co-founder of the New Forum opposition movement in East Germany, which contributed to the downfall of the Soviet-backed dictatorship of the Socialist Unity Party of Germany; he served as a member of the only freely elected People’s Chamber for the Alliance 90 in 1990. Following the Reunification of Germany, he served as the first Federal Commissioner for the Stasi Archives from 1990 to 2000. As Federal Commissioner, he earned recognition as a “Stasi hunter”, exposing the crimes of the former communist political police.[2]

He was nominated as the candidate of the SPD and the Greens for President of Germany in the 2010 election, but narrowly lost to Christian Wulff, the candidate of the government coalition. However, his candidacy found strong resonance in the population, and Der Spiegel described him as “the better President.”[3] The German media dubbed him the candidate of the hearts.[4][5] Following Wulff’s 2012 resignation, Joachim Gauck was agreed on as a nonpartisan consensus candidate of all parties except the former East German communist party in the 2012 presidential election.[6][7][8]

A son of a survivor of a Soviet Gulag,[9][10][11][12] Gauck’s political life was heavily influenced by the suffering of his own family and his upbringing in the totalitarian communist regime of East Germany. A founding signatory of the Prague Declaration on European Conscience and Communism, together with Václav Havel and other statesmen, and the Declaration on Crimes of Communism, Gauck has called for increased awareness of communist crimes in Europe and the prosecution of communist criminals. He has criticized the political left of ignoring communist crimes.[13] The Independent has described him as “Germany’s answer to Nelson Mandela.”[14] He has been described by Chancellor Angela Merkel as a “true teacher of democracy” and a “tireless advocate of freedom, democracy and justice.”[15]

SOURCE: WIKIPEDIA

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joachim_Gauck

DOWNLOAD ORIGINAL REPORT HERE

einschatzung_wirtschaft_deutschebank_juni_1989

DOWMLOAD ORIGINAL DOCUMENT HERE

bericht_brd_marz_1989

Report of the special operation controllers Rostock, May 1989

PLEASE DOWNLOAD HERE

bel_bericht_rostock_mai_1989

Liebe Leser,

auch Sie werden verstehen, dass man frühere Freunde und Mitarbeiter, ja sogar Partner, nicht gerne Verbrechen beschuldigt.

Das tue ich auch nicht gerne. Denn ich habe eine jahrelange Arbeit in die Immobilienzeitung gesteckt und ich werde Ihnen zeigen, wer diese Zeitung zu dem gemacht hat, was sie ist.

Dies war kein anoymes Redakteurskollektiv blutiger Anfänger und Studienabbrecher, hier stand eine gestaltende Hand mit Erfahrung und Wissen dahinter.

DESWEGEN  HAT SICH DIE IZ SICH AUCH SEIT MEINEM ABGANG SEIT  JAHRZEHNTEN NICHT WEITERENTWICKELN KÖNNEN, SEITDEM DIESE HAND FEHLT.

DIE IZ-EPIGONEN HASSEN MICH UND HABEN ANGST VOR DEM FREIEN WETTBEWERB !

ES ENTSETZT MICH,  MIT WELCHEN MIITELN HIER KONKURRENTEN AUSGESCHALTET WERDEN UND SOGAR KRMININALISIERT WERDEN.

NUR WEIL EINE BEATE P EXISTIERT UND ALLES AUSBREMST !

DIESE  DUMMHEIT UND SCHWÄCHE FÜHRT  SOGAR DAZU SICH MIT EX-STASI-LEUTEN ZU VERBÜNDEN !

DAS SCHADET DER DEUTSCHEN WIRTSCHAFT, DER IMMOBILIENBRANCHE UND DER DEMOKRATIE UND IHNEN  !

HERZLICHST IHR

BERND PULCH,  MA

PS ES GIBT EINE BEATE  UND EINE GABRIELE

Doc.6 of 6
Amsel (XV/4229/83) no entry
1983/1987
5 files
7093 25/07/86
(HVA/III)
letter of the British FM Howe to Oliver Tambo
7034 07/05/86
(HVA/III)
internal information of the British secret services to the ANC on
negotiations perspectives of the BOTHA regime with the liberation
movement and reaction of the ANC
Bob (XV/1471/65) no entry
1965/1985
5 files
6494 21/02/85
(HVA/II)
VS material on dislocation of British Rhein army
4910 05/02/82
(HVA/II)
FES highly confidential report to the SPD leadership summit on
industrial relations in GB – SPD discussion paper
4842 18/12/81
(HVA/II)
results, meeting of the 6th circle within the SPD directorate on
26/11/81
4755 09/10/81
(HVA/II)
internal note of the SPD PV on the office session of the union of the
social democratic parties of the EU on 10-11/09/81 in Brussels
From Poland
7597 03/05/89 Technical equipement of British police
7541 07/05/87 exercises, united NATO armed forces, Winter-Cimex 1987
6884 22/11/85 meeting with chief of national section of BBC radio
From Bulgaria
7542 13/05/87 on radio monitoring stations and tapping centres in Cyprus.
7539 30/04/87 on conduct of NATO manoeuvres “Cold Winter”
6874 13/08/85 discussions on terrorism at special NATO Council
6843 18/03/85 ACE COMSECD NATO: Nato discusses a program for the exchange of
coding equipments that are commonly used within the national
military intelligence systems.
Ringo (XV/400/86)
7519 17/11/87
(HVA/I)
information material from the British Emb. In Moscow
7518 17/11/87
(HVA/I)
structure, staff and leadership, UK ministry of industry and trade
MfS/HAII:
6439 16/01/84 Protocol lists, NATO armed forces in West Berlin
6438 01/01/84 General Major B. C. Gordon-Lennox, MBE (former infantry guard)
Gaston (XV/141/65) HVA II/ref 5
6735 18/10/85
(HVA/II)
GASTON reports of ZDF foreign correspondent as background for
upcoming discussions of the Television council for policy and TV prog
in Bonn on 18/09/85
6192 20/07/84
(HVA/II)
ZDF-reports from foreign correspondent
5461 08/10/82
(HVA/II)
ZDF reports from foreign correspondent (material formerly not open)
Susi (XV/4265/76) no entry
6240 05/10/84
(HVA/XV)
structure of civilian employees of British Rhein Army
5861 21/12/83
(HVA/XV)
British Rhein army services
5660 15/04/83
(HVA/XV)
structural questions of the OETV and information on pbs of the UK and
US armies in Moenchen Gladbach area
Lore (III/621/76)
5787 14/10/83
(NEUBRANDENBURG XV)
development of MIK grouping
5786 14/10/83 modernisation of weapons of countries of the Warsaw Pact
through NATO nations
Tajo (XV/6721/80)
5775 11/10/83
(HVA/XIV)
English arms companies
5774 11/10/83 Feuerleit control system, British arms company Ferranti
Eric (XV/75/83) RES. 201
7576 03/10/88 ERIC GB Factory ICI and trade with the GDR
5719 20/06/83
(HVA/III)
info on decision to send and activities of a CND representative to
Prague meeting (21-26/06)
5485 26/11/82
(HVA/III)
on specific questions of the British state of emergency planning
(preparation of war time)
Zielke (XV/2178/74)
6998 17/04/86
(HVA/XIII)
chemical and biological warfare developments 1985 – JP Perry
Robinson
5741 03/08/83
(HVA/XIII)
proceedings, conf. of Swedish representatives and ministers on
chemical weapons 05719
Stamm
6189 18/07/84
(HVA/XI)
strategic synopsis of office for studies and exercises of the German
army dated 26/09/83
5649 00/04/83
(HVA/XI)
4 position papers of the AA in the FRG on middle range weapons with
a remark from the disarmament officer, Amb. Ruth
Roland (XV/4608/75) HVAIX/REF 9, P 231
5742 09/08/83
(HVA/III)
doc. From Chase World information corporation on arab investments
5640 17/03/83
(HVA/XI)
planning of exercises and mil. Activities of the US/Berlin brigade for
1983
5406 03/09/82
(HVA/XI)
personnel data on total number of Berliner officers of the Us/Berlin
brigade with partial data on French and British mil. Personnel in WB
Richard (XV/351/73) HVA I/ref 6, P 202
5427 26/10/82
(HVA/I)
HTR symposium
5426 26/10/82 natural gas
Alpha (MfS/4283/60) HVA X/ref 3, P 226
5851 15/12/83
(HVA/X)
EU Commission docs on funding, positions of come states
5206 21/04/82
(HVA/X)
letter of former Foreign Minister Lord Carrington to EU President
Pirol (XV/2904/78)
7219 17/12/86 material from UK intelligence services on Libya
4911 09/02/82
(HVA/XII)
info. From UK secret services on far-right extremism
Holz (XV/2426/74)
4892 06/01/82
(HVA/III)
on internal report of the British National Council for economic
developments and development trends of British trade in the field of
manufacturing industry
4865 23/12/81
(HVA/III)
internal report from the British National Council for economic
development on energy situation
4843 11/12/81
(HVA/III)
internal assess. of the British National Committee for economic
development on theme industry policy in Europe
Joerg (MfS/10874/60)
5785 14/10/83
(HVA/XI)
leading employee from the national security council on US future
actions towards the Soviet Union and other socialist countries
4769 22/10/81
(HVA/XI)
Study on legislative perpsective and the new committee sys. Of the
House of Commons.
Bettina (XV/92/67)
4641 25/06/81
(KARL MARX XV)
project system (UK) extension of invts for the construction of a
computer sys. based on GDR micro-processors in Leeds, Yorkshire
4658 25/06/81
(KARL MARX XV)
BNFL Windscale project (UK)[Bau v. Anlagen] for the storage and the
manufacture of nuclear combustible in Windscale (Grafschaft Cumbria)
4476 02/04/81
(KARL MARX XV)
Zimbabwe conf. on reconstruction and dev. 23-27/03/81
5071 12/04/82
(KARL MARX XV)
project for rational energy need in England
5032 21/04/82
(KARL MARX XV)
airport project in Manchester
Jaeger (XV/2313/79)
4881 30/11/81
(HVA/III)
6 reports from the foreign policy committee of the British Parliament
Zimbabwe – the role of British economic aid to the development of
Zimbabwe
4719 14/08/81
(HVA/III)
Info on 5th report of the Foreign Affairs Committee of the British
House of Commons on upcoming North/South summit in Mexico (oct.
81)
Doktor_Zeit (XV/2855/68)
4924 05/02/82
(BERLIN XV)
activities of the Greens within peace movt at the European level.
4730 (BERLIN XV) conclusions report on the 1st term of the Central Commission for
Biological Security
Jutta (MfS/1815/60)
4671 21/08/81
(BERLIN XV)
reports on 719th and 720th EU Council meeting on 6 & 13/07/81
4531 18/05/81
(BERLIN XV)
completion of reform of EU budget
Rat (XV/305/79)
6509 04/03/85
(BERLIN XV)
on conference ” nuclear war by mistake – evitable or inevitable?” on
15-16/02/85 in Stockholm
4653 12/08/81
(HVA/III)
Info on a confirmed project of the Labour Party leadership (NEC)
related to the question of GB’s exit from the EU
Granit (XV/305/79)
4652 12/08/81
(HVA/III)
Info on power struggle within the Labour Party
4380 04/03/81
(HVA/III)
on activities of British [Gewerkschaftsdachverbandes] (Roof trade
union?) TUC on protection of Polish trade union Solidaritaet
Eva (XV/1362/65)
4981 00/04/82
(HALLE XV)
operational concept for the area of 1st PZDIV-Braunschweig,
Hildesheim, Zweigkanal, Peine, Hannover – protocol from the
Wehrbereichskommando II dated 20/01/82
4638 00/08/81
(HALLE XV)
exercises of Allied armed forces. Combat exercise of the UK 3rd
Division Red Claymore on 28/9-28/10/81 (transfer of division on [V
Fall festgelegten Routen]) MI 53.2 – 1551-1 (81) Secret
Bruecke (XV/1908/73)
4571 19/06/81
(HVA/III)
on interal assess. of the politburo of the central committee of the UK
CP on the Polish issue at the PR meeting on 11/06/81
Anna (XV/2873/62)
4572 08/05/81
(HVA/II)
doc. On the meeting of liberal and democratic faction within the EUP
on 27-28/04/81 in the Hague on theme EU security and defense
XV/268/68
3218 18/04/79
(HVA/XV)
Internal report from BSC London on visit to fair in Kwangchow (China)
and on trade negotiations with China in the steel sector
XV/134/71
3230 02/04/79
(HVA/III)
British Navy staff HQ document
XII/2486/70
2309 14/08/77
(DRESDEN XV)
SI confidential internal docs nr B/1/77 on 21/01/77; b/4/77 on
11/03/77; 4/77 on 11/02/77; B/7/77 on 26/05/77 on SI office
meeting on 30/03/77 in London – Invitation – Agenda – List of
participants – Office activities – SI plan 1977-78 and related pbs –
detailed 1977-78 program – Analysis resolution in Spain – Resolution
in Czechoslovakia – List of participants – protocol of participating party
representatives
XV/2742/76
2362 28/09/77
(HVA/IX)
files from British armed forces (Phone directory of the British Corps
159 and 1 dept. info nr 27)
XV/1093/67
1976-1980
35 DOCS
GB gov. / Labour Party
3062 14/11/78
(HVA/III)
Confidential studies on EU problematic from the British Labour Party
2229 28/06/77
(HVA/III)
material from the international committee of the British LP leadership
from meeting on 10/05/77
XV/ 3926/63
1792 05/02/75
(LEIPZIG XV)
Phone directory, British armed forces in WB on November 1974
XV/ 212/73
1962 15/11/76
(HVA/IX)
Staff list, British infantery brigade HQ in WB, July 1976
4963 Protocle list of the British armed forces in WB, Feb. 1976
1964 15/11/76 Staff list, British armed forces in WB, 1975
1965 15/11/76
(HVA/IX)
Exercise Parang, 1 Batalion paratroopers of the British Armed forces
from WB on troop exercise field Sennelager
1968 11/11/76
(HVA/IX)
various material from the British armed forces in WB
XV/2962/76
2281 19/08/77
(HVA/III)
Confidential conversation of the EU Council nr S/692/77 (RCC39) – 8th
report from the EU trade council in China
XV/1823/64
2281 11/07/77
(HVA/IX)
manual of joint warfare volume II joint tactical communications
OTHERS
4752 30/10/81 PIERRE
(HVA/XI)
Allies manoeuvres Rondo XXI in WB
4745 22/10/81 DOKTOR
(HVA/X)
strategic and tactical thoughts of the international dept of
the British Labour Party on current policy towards South
Africa
4739 12/08/81 KONGRESZ
(HVA/III)
Apartheid and Business a Swiss strategic and tactical study
for the establishment of eco. & tactical relations between
the imperialistic countries and RSA in the eighties dated
26/02/81 (nr. 1262)
4732 18/09/81 WESER
(HVA/XI)
Study of the Congress – research service on NATO pbs and
the modernisation of arms control
4700 26/08/81 HELMUT
(HVA/III)
internal assess. of an Indian and a Belgian diplomats on
issues related to the Geneva disarmament negotiations
4695 07/09/81 MAI
(MAGDEBURG
XV)
Views of Richard Lehner on NATO manoeuvre negotiations
in Fall 81 on Lower Sachsen territory
4684 04/09/81 JACK
(HVA/IV)
eco. and industry policy of British gov.
4486 14/04/81 GERD
(HVA/XIII)
progress of work on chemical war materials in GB
4465 04/04/81 TENNE
(HVA/II)
consultations, the Conf. of European Churches (CEC) in
Cardiff / GB on 24-28/03/81
4409 02/04/81 ANTON
(HVA/III)
NATO secret files on a multifunctional communication
[verteilung] system MIDS
4382 26/02/81 ZENTRUM
(HVA/XIV)
Activities of ICL England company and upcoming business
with the GDR
7582 02/05/89 REINHOLD Assess. Of Gorbatchow’s visit in GB, views of diplomats
from British Emb. In Vienna
7578 06/10/88 KARL assess. Of British PM Thatcher’s speech in Bruegge and in
Luxembourg on 20-21/09/88
7526 11/02/87 FROM
HUNGARY
on co-operation between the US and the RIIA
7488 02/10/87 INGRID E88 (GB, France, Israel’s contributions)
7479 10/09/87 ALTMEISTER modalities of deployment of British military units on / from
transport facilities.(ferries)
7479 10/09/87 RAINER conversations with representatives of Konzerns from the
FRG, GB and Sweden on 05/09/87.
7440 03/07/87 ROEMER classified telegram on memorandum of understanding for
electronic order of battle support, zuflint lock 87 su bold
guard 86.
7406 01/06/87 BASTIAN files on the structure, capacities, profile and market
position of chemical konzern.
7377 04/05/87 GEMSE Egon Bahr on prospective policy for Europe; more security
in Europe will relieve both superpowers (quote?)
7366 14/04/87 OLAF Analysis for the British Konzern United Sterling Cooperation
on delivery pbs of the GDR AHB Polygraph
7360 06/04/87 DISKONT assess. Of the Midland bank, London, on eco. Situation and
trade activities with VR Bulgaria
7351 00/04/87 HANS Conversation with Loeffler, Ristock, Momper, Heimann and
Kremendahl on one side, and the British envoy in West
Berlin and two other representatives of the British military.
7350 30/03/87 TRISTAN full text, Howe’s speech, at the Belgian Royal Institute for
International Relations, Brussels, 16/03/87.
7320 23/02/87 ERLE some thoughts from VRM leadership on structure of
relations between the UK and Frontlienienstaaten?
7220 17/12/86 HERZOG Report on 8 international HTR meeting in San Diego,
California on 15-16/09/86
7203 03/12/86 FLIEGER
(HVA/IX)
manual of interoperability of health services
7411 05/06/87 BAR/875 assess. Within the SPD and the diplomatic corps on
discussion on the military doctrine, as well as assess. Of
the FRG gov. on disarmament policy
7141 09/10/86 TALAR
(HVA/II)
SPD Parliament’s section’s final proposals on 1986-1987
budget for the “Hunting flight 90″ [Jäger90] project
7126 08/09/86 ROTHER
(HVA/XIII)
ICI’s position on trade with CMEA countries, particularly
the GDR
7121 26/08/86 SCHAEFER
(HVA/II)
materials from the Greens on topic”the FRG contribution to
nuclear disarmament in western Europe”
7118 18/08/86 ASPHALT
(HVA/III)
confidential report of the UK Emb. In Libanon on the UK
policy in the Middle-East
7087 16/07/86 ANTOS
(HVA/XI)
a Rand note British and French strategic forces response
options
7064 19/06/86 BERG
(HVA/III)
internal convention between the Labour Party Leadership
and British monopoly circles on policy of a future Labour
government after the parliamentary elections
7052 27/05/86 WALD
(HVA/III)
joint study of the FCO and the UK Defence Ministry on the
eco. Situation in the USSR and the feasibility of the soviet
eco prog.
6795 04/12/85 SCHUSTER
(HVA/XI)
studies, 3rd world congress for soviet and East-European
studies, 30/10-04/11/85 in Washington DC.
6789 29/11/85 BAR/102
(HVA/I)
synopsis on SDI
6779 19/11/85 OLSEN
(HVA/III)
internal personal views of WEU sec gen, Alfred Cahen, on
assess. Of a report from WEU SDI working group
6723 16/10/85 PAUL
(HVA/III)
US military bases in the UK
6716 15/10/85 ANDRE
(HVA/XI)
Thoughts of one of the representatives to the congress,
Gorbatchew/Mitterrand & Gorbatchew/Reagan summits.
6629 21/06/85 DIREKTOR
(HVA/AG K)
On London institute for international relations
6635 03/07/85 REINHARD
(HVA/I)
“Cosmic space, national security and C3I” conference
material of Mitre corporation, USA
6674 12/08/85 PETRA
(HVA/II)
changes in UK Rhein Army
6538 29/03/85 BAR/650
(HVA/I)
material from “German Strategy Forum” on 14/03/85 in
Bonn-Bad-Godesberg
6535 27/03/85 JUST
(HVA/XII)
position of leading members of the international
politologists executive committee IPSA on US/USSR and
US/Western Europe relations
6529 19/03/85 FRITZ
(HVA/XIII)
conclusion of contract between Ministry for chemical
industry and Shell International Chemical company
6523 14/03/85 JOCHEN
(HVA/XII)
Conference”Key problems of technological transfer and the
need for intellectual property” on 6-7/03/85 in Cambridge
6521 13/03/85 FREQUENZ
(HVA/IV)
Infra Red measureing Ir-Vermessung (flight data) of NATO
planes during NATO exercise Trial Embow I in Aberporth /
GB
6520 12/03/85 HANDWERKER
(HVA/AG K)
Federal institute for Eastern and international studies,
Cologne – 2nd conference on “Relations between economy
and politics in the USSR”.
6509 04/03/85 RAT
(BERLIN XV)
on conference ” nuclear war by mistake – evitable or
inevitable?” on 15-16/02/85 in Stockholm
6480 29/01/85 ECKAHRDT
(HVA/III)
on internal split within the UK CP leadership
6321 27/12/84 KOREN
(SWT/AG1)
reductions in US costs to station forces in the Federal
Republic of Germany and the United Kingdom are unlikely
6304 07/12/84 STADT
(GERA/AG)
Konzern analysis interatom GmbH
6299 05/12/84 FALKE
(BERLIN XV)
internal study of the Federal Ministry for German relations
on situation of GDR research in the UK and the US
6239 05/10/84 HERZOG
(HVA/AG K)
report civil exploitation of defence technology
6193 23/07/84 H_SCHNEIDER
(ERFURT XV)
combined action of big companies Kloeckner Humboldt
Deutz with NATO military officials on the development of
MRCA tornado
6059 23/03/84 MUENZER
(HVA/X)
NATO commissioned study on history, structure, spectrum
of activity, field of influence and evolution of British peace
movement
5867 29/12/83 KOBRA
(HVA/XIV)
14 TH RB 199 local tecnical committee meeting
5824 15/11/83 VOGT
(HVA/XI)
on Ripon – Bow – Adenauer conference on NATO-Alliance
relations and on East-West relations
5823 14/11/83 SCHOEN
(HVA/I)
report on results of trip to Moscow on 10-12/10/83,
delegation of unterausschusses for disarmament and arms
control of the FRG parliament
5821 09/11/83 SONJA
(HVA/XII)
political activities of FRG citizens against the state and
their connections with West European Peace movement
5813 03/11/83 ZENTRAL
(HVA/AG K)
NATO conlusions – working paper for argumentation in the
political opposition
5777 12/10/83 KRUG
(HVA/XIII)
MfA Political directors council, FR, GB, US and the FRG in
NY
5772 06/10/83 B_STERNBERG
(NEUBRANDENBURG
XV)
on organisation of NATO base Norfolk, on relevant military
construction measures for the stationing of cruise missiles
in the area of Cornwall, England
5718 16/06/83 SCHULZ on E. Thompson’s activities against Prague Peace
(BERLIN XV) conference
5734 20/0783 ANNA
(HVA/II)
report from commercial director of the F. Naumann
Stiftung on global work 1983/83, as well as material from
the Th. Heuss Academy on 1984 plans and material from
the Europe office of the F. Naumann Stiftung
5728 07/07/83 HENRY
(HVA/X)
internal files from the Commerzbank
5635 17/03/83 GOVERNOR
(HVA/XIII)
on the creation of an export insurance company Bond
Support Advisers Ltd in London
5629 15/03/83 SAMSON
(SWT/
13.15.III)
british defence directory
5619 07/03/83 LINDNER
(HVA/XI)
The politics of central Europe, report from David Owen
5600 10/02/83 BRITTA
(HVA/IV)
thanks to a reliable source we have conception information
for Chancellor Kohl for his upcoming meeting with English
Pm in Febr. 83
5586 19/01/83 RODE
(HVA/XIV)
construction and finalisation of Tornado CFK-Tailerons
5578 17/01/83 AKKER
(HVA/II)
internal working paper from the PV of the SPD on German
strategy towards the US and the USSR during the Geneva
INF negotiations
5523 09/12/82 JUST
(HVA/XII)
internal report from a former US Amb. ontheme “the persic
gulf and the US policy – What still has to be done”
5254 08/07/82 RAUCH
(HVA/XIV)
creative strategies – Western European robotics
instrumentation industry analysis service
5221 01/06/82 SCHWARZ
(LEIPZIG XV)
European institute for security policy
5203 23/06/82 JACK
(HVA/XI)
The Falkland crisis info – material from the research
department of the US congress
5153 05/05/82 DR PETER
(HVA/XII)
results of discussions within the EU on pbs related to the
GB/Argentina conflict, as well as on similar potential
conflicts between France and Canada
5089 12/05/82 KORB
(HVA/XI)
3 studies on concept of the Reagan’s administration and on
West European opinions on arms control & security issues
5072 28/04/82 BELIN
(HVA/I)
on the SPD security policy towards the GB/Argentina
conflict at its Party Day in Munich
5069 25/03/82 HELENE
(HVA/I)
International Energy Agency – activities
5049 19/03/82 JUTTA
(BERLIN XV)
reports on EU Council meeting – 753 rd meeting (economic
and finance ministers) on 15/02/82 – 755th meeting
(Foreign affairs) on 22-23/02/82
4985 01/04/82 WAGNER
(HALLE XV)
HMS Speedy report of proceedings during operation F
IBALT 28/10-01/12/81
4981 00/04/82 EVA
(HALLE XV)
operational concept for the area of 1st PZDIVBraunschweig,
Hidlesheim, Zweigkanal, Peine, Hannover –
protocol from the Wehbereichskommando II dated
20/01/82
4924 05/02/82 DR_ZEIT
(BERLIN XV)
activities of the Greens within peace movt at the European
level.
4904 14/01/82 LESNER
(HVA/III)
US and GB anti-Ethiopian activities from Sudan and on
results of manoeuvres Bright Star 82
4896 08/01/82 DIREKTOR
(HVA/XII)
views of FCO Foreign Office (blacked out name) former
member of British Emb. in the GDR on current political pbs
4881 30/11/81 JAEGER
(HVA/III)
6 report from the foreign policy committee of the British
Parliament Zimbabwe – the role of British economic aid to
the development of Zimbabwe

DOWNLOAD ORIGINAL DOCUMENT HERE

hvasira6

Doc. 5 of 6
Merten (Mfs/6427/60) Dr Hagen Blau, West German diplomat.
1960/1987
35 files
6297 04/12/84
(HVA/I)
144 & 145 EPZ political committee
4988 22/03/82
(HVA/I)
international institute for applied systemic analysis – Austria
4879 21/12/81
(HVA/I)
Info AA service in Bonn on human dimension of the KSZE documents –
Bidenkopf’s views on nuclear strategy GB domestic policy – Hamm
Bruecher ‘s speech in the US
4878 21/12/81
(HVA/I)
info- AA service in Bonn on the FRG argumentation on natural gas
Roehren activities – cultural exchange agreement China information
issues in UN sys. – Commonwealth conf. in Oct. 81 – Egypt after
Sadate’s death – Terrorism in Italy – situation in Greece – Friendship
contract between Libya and Ethiopia and VDRJ
Topas (XV/333/69) Rainer Rupp, Nato official.
1969/1989
32 files
7573 07/09/88 Document from the British delegation to NATO; soviet computer industry
7455 01/08/87 NATO document C-M (87) co-ordinated production of European combat
aircraft
7407 03/06/87 NATO document DPC/D (86) 10 – United Kingdom defence plans 1987-
1991.
7321 24/02/87 NATO information, Annex A, B, C of general report NATO-doc DPC/D
(86) 10
7307 10/02/87 NATO information bullet points and background information for NATO
sec. Gen. In preparation of meeting of defence ministers of the alliance
7299 04/02/87 military docs CIG(86)167; CIG(86)168; CIG(86)169; CIG(86)170;
CIG(86)172; CIG(86)175, 176
7209 06/12/86
(HVA/XII)
NATO doc JGP(86)105 multilateral defence verification of the UK
7125 08/09/86
(HVA/XII)
PQ-85 UK answer to 1985-1990 goals of the armed forces
7085 11/07/86
(HVA/XII)
NATO doc JPG(68)59 UK presentation on objectives of the multilateral
verification of the armed forces
7006 21/04/86
(HVA/XII)
NATO doc. DPQ (85) – UK – Navy – statistics
6972 25/03/86
(HVA/XII)
NATO doc. DPQ (85) GB – statistics – Air army
6944 19/02/86
(HVA/XII)
NATO doc. DPQ (85) – UK – Statistics Heer
6918 27/01/86
(HVA/XII)
NATO doc. DPC/D (85) 21 – UK – NATO defence plans 1986-1990.
6905 09/01/86
(HVA/XII)
NATO doc. DRQ-85 – UK
6822 23/12/85
(HVA/XII)
NATO doc. – British response to defence planning 1984 – Navy tables
6790 02/12/85 NATO doc. JGP (85) 11 – presentation on multilateral verification of UK
armed forces plans.
6669 07/08/85
(HVA/XII)
NATO doc DRC/DS (85) 21 – Conclusions sheet of DRC meeting on
18/06/85
6517 12/03/85 NATO doc DPQ (84) UK-D/1- UK answer on defence planning
perspectives 1984.
6515 11/03/85
(HVA/XII)
NATO doc DPQ (84) D1 – UK – Answer on 1985-1990 objectives – Air
force
6507 28/02/85
(HVA/XII)
NATO doc DPQ (84) UK – D/1 – UK answer on 1984 defense planning –
Navy
6496 22/02/85 NATO doc DPQ (84) UK – D/1 – UK answer on 1984 defense planning –
Haer
6479 28/01/85 NATO doc DPC/D (84) 5 – 1985-1990 objectives of the armed forces
6460 09/01/85 NATO doc C-M (84) 53 – situation in Eastern and south Asia – March-
Sept. 1984
6309 11/12/84
(HVA/XII)
NATO doc PN (84) 68 – Assess. Defence planning – UK
5985 13/01/84 NATO doc DRC/DS (83) conclusions sheet of DRC meeting dated
17/11/83
5647 25/03/83 NATO info on NATO exercise Wintex Cimex 83
Weber (XV/819/66)
1966/1987
29 files
6681 26/08/85
(HVA/I)
EU/GB/Ethiopia – EU General Secretariat, Brussels – 19/07/85 UK
memorandum on EU policy towards Ethiopia
5643 21/03/83 report from AA in the FRG on Zambia’s domestic and foreign policy and
preparation of negotiations FRG/Zambia
5608 22/02/83
(HVA/I)
AA internal material on Namibia’s question
5536 30/12/82
(HVA/I)
BMZ material on the preparation of the CDA governmental conference on
26-28/10/82 in Washington
5185 08/06/82
(HVA/I)
assess. AA Bonn on 38th meeting of the OUA Council of ministers in
Addis Abeba ( March 1982)
Roedel (XV/483/68)
1968/1987
26 files
7513 04/11/87
KARL-MARX
TOWN
background information on programme JF 90
7471 00/09/87 NATO-D/33 from 17/07/87.
7359 03/04/87
KARL MARX
TOWN
NATO document from 02/87
7198 27/11/86 WT report nr 22/86
6619 10/06/85
(K-MARX XV)
NATO /85 WP V , 07/05/85
6658 25/07/85
(HVA/XI)
NATO 1861/85
6184 06/07/84
(K MARX XV)
FRG Emb. in London report nr 14/84 Thorn EMI purchase offer to British
aerospace leads to a new British armaments konzern
5864 23/12/83
(K MARX XV)
TAF JF 90
5852 16/12/83 NATO 3116/83
5801 21/10/83
(K MARX XV)
on meeting national armaments directors of the 4 groups on 20-
22/09/83 in Williamsburg, USA
5768 29/09/83 conception, British NATO delegation, on research issues
5717 15/05/83
(K-MARX XV)
GEIP – Project armed anti-tank guidance generation
5716 15/06/83 NATO-Corrigendum to DS AC/259/31
5715 15/06/83 mil. Techn. Objectives plan – light transport & SAR helicopter
5711 08/06/83 NATO 1306/83
5573 05/01/83
(HVA/XII)
NATO info. Content of the latest meeting of NATO Council at the Amb.
level before the ministerials in Dec. 1982
5445 19/10/82
(K MARX XV)
single report 20/82 (L)
5418 15/10/82
(K MARX XV)
NATO 2722/82
5395 29/09/82 NATO 2608/82 AC/302 (PG/2) D/29
5377 29/09/82 FRG Emb. in London, single report 59/82 (M) – background information
on Schiffverluste (Sheffield-Coventy-Atlantic Conveyor)
5253 07/07/82
(K MARX XV)
Air/air plane body
4923 15/02/82
(K MARX XV)
NATO 4113/81
4887 02/12/81
(K MARX XV)
working group on air defence definition of flying weapons systems –
invitation to 94 meeting
Genf
1987
26 files
7143 10/10/86
(HVA/AG K)
materials from IISS 28th annual conf. in Kyoto on theme “Eastern Asia,
the West and international security…”
6943 18/02/86
(HVA/AG K)
Conf. of Aspen Institute in West Berlin on 7-10/02/86. Theme “new
dimension of security in nuclear time”
Peter (XV/96/72) Alfred Spuehler, BND official.
1972/1984
24 files
5782 14/10/83
(HVA/IX)
monthly military situation report, West and rest of the world,1-
31/07/83
5733 19/07/83
(HVA/IX)
mil. Situation report n 4/82 dated April 1983
5652 05/04/83
(HVA/IX)
mil. Situation report West – monthly report nr 2/83
5651 05/04/83 mil. Situation report – monthly report nr 1/83
5606 18/02/83
(HVA/IX)
mil. Monthly report – NATO states and European neutral states nr 12/82
for period 01-31/12/82
5588 20/01/83
(HVA/IX)
mil. Situation report West – monthly report nr 11/82
5524 15/12/82
(HVA/IX)
mil. Situation report, rest of the world, 1-30/09/82
5513 15/12/82
(HVA/IX)
mil. Monthly report, NATO states and European neutral states – nr
10/82
5349 23/07/82
(HVA/IX)
mil. Monthly situation report, rest of the world, period 01/06-30/06/82
5258 08/07/82
(HVA/IX)
mil. Situation report, rest of the world, period 01-31/05/82
5219 10/06/82
(HVA/IX)
mil. Situation report, NATO U.A
5064 11/05/82
(HVA/IX)
mil. Monthly report, NATO states and European neutral states nr 3/82
period 01-31/03/82
5051 23/04/82
(HVA/IX)
UK assess. of Soviet air attack brigade
4990 05/04/82
(HVA/IX)
from a secret diplomatic correspondence of AA MBFR Bonn on views of
a Chinese diplomat on internal pbs of the Soviet mil. Mission in the FRG
4983 06/04/82
(HVA/III)
on international conference of Japan’s SP on disarmament issues
Horn (XV/6258/81)
1981/1986
18 files
5152 04/05/82
(HVA/III)
assess. of Malwin conflict by leading Argentinan mil.
5147 24/04/82
(HVA/III)
on results of Haig negotiations on 18-19/04/82 on resolution of Malwin
crisis in buenos Aires
5146 27/04/82 on development of Malwin conflict and the backgrounds of activities of
Argentinan mil. leadership
Rose (XV/190/63) Margarethe Lubig, Nato official
1963/1987
7450 29/07/87 NATO list of security officers of representations, of the IMS, the HQs
and member states delegations.
7310 12/02/87 plans of repair and construction of NATO aircraft and missiles in the
FRG and subsequent costs
7216 12/12/86
(HVA/XII)
2 internal letters from BMVG on procurement contract for skynet
satellite (28-29/10/86)
7051 26/05/86
(HVA/XII)
progress of work of the realisation of NATO infrastructure plans
6810 17/12/85
(HVA/I)
meeting of working group East-West relations of the DGAP on 10/06/85
6776 18/11/85
(HVA/XII)
NATO – aus dem Schriftverkehr einer NATO Dienststelle
6665 01/08/85
(HVA/XII)
NATO meeting of infrastructure on 16/07/85
6323 28/12/84
(HVA/XII)
infrastructure – Ship shore ship buffer (SSSB)
6294 03/12/84 prospective positions of united countries on 3 billion – IAU – ceiling and
of rest of document DPC (84)0
5978 06/01/84
(HVA/XII)
NATO – air bases Guetersloh setting up of supplementary ordnance
depot, British prefinancing of construction works.
5977 02/01/84
(HVA/XII)
NATO ministerial conference 5-9/12/83, DABM (Defence against
1969?/1987
14 files
7500 14/10/87 latest conversations ANC – white minority and UK position on the
resolution of the conflict in RSA.
6711 10/10/85
(HVA/VI)
Assess. Of a member of UK CP on situation within the party
5762 20/09/83
(POTSDAM XV)
internal letter from the Peace network – London
5752 24/08/83
(POTSDAM XV)
information about split between CND and END at the Oxford Conf. in
July 83 and on IKV’s activities in the Hague.
5017 12/04/82
(POTSDAM XV)
info. On Peace network
Walter (XV/750/66)
1966/1986
14 files
6512 07/03/85
(HVA/II)
conversation with European director of trilateral committee, Georges
Berthoin, on 19/02/85 in Paris
6463 10/01/85
(HVA/II)
secret meeting of leading Logenfunktionaere on 05/01/85 in the FRG.
6141 05/06/84 Views, Monsieur Berthoin, Europe director at the trilateral committee,
on current political questions and committee’s activities
6140 05/06/84
(HVA/II)
Comparative analysis on assess. Of soviet detente policy between Prof.
Haftendorn, Berlin and British deputy
5710 08/06/83
(HVA/II)
BMFT report on stance and perspectives of progress of High
temperature reactors and fast brutreaktor
5657 07/04/83
(HVA/II)
Draft report of the political committee of the EUP on arms procurement
dated 23/08/82
5542 16/12/82
(HVA/II)
2 materials from the European Socialist movt
4949 05/03/82
(HVA/II)
files from the EU Commission
Cantor (MfS/12904/60)
1960/1983
13 files
5764 23/09/83
(HVA/AG K)
Leading employee of the UK Emb. in the GDR on current political pbs.
5663 20/04/83
(HVA/AG K)
from GB Emb. on Karl Marx conf
5650 00/04/83 British EU experts on EU current pbs
5562 16/12/82
(HVA/AG K)
leading member of the International institute for strategic studies,
London, on current questions of East-West relations
5432 22/10/82
(HVA/AG K)
from the British Foreign Ministry on foreign policy of the new
government in Bonn
5408 17/09/82
(HVA/AG K)
British diplomat on East-West commercial relations
5097 29/04/82
(HVA/AG K)
SPD “Unterbezirksvorsitzender” on security policy and on current
foreign policy questions
5087 06/05/82
(HVA/AG K)
from the US Emb. on current agricultural questions
4834 11/11/81
(HVA/AG K)
questions of the European political co-operation and the role of the EUP
Cello (XV/872/74)
1974/1984
13 files
5731 14/07/83
(HVA/I)
reaction of GB Emb. in the FRG on Kohl’s trip to Moscow
5429 02/10/82
(HVA/I)
on Labour Party day in Blackpool on domestic policy circle in the FRG
from the UK pt of view
5428 17/09/82
(HVA/I)
reaction of the British Emb. in Bonn on Wischnewski’s conversations in
the GDR and critic on further perspectives of the FRG government’s
coalition
4844 23/12/81
(HVA/I)
France’s position on results of Honecker/Schmidt meeting and on other
FR foreign policy positions
Toepfer (XV/821/66)
1966/1987
12 files
6631 26/06/85
(HVA/I)
report of the FRG foreign minister delegation on speech on “Germany
and Berlin issues” on 05/06/85 in Lisbon
5696 19/05/83
(HVA/I)
Emb. report from London on V. Weizaescker in oxford and London
5597 01/02/83
(HVA/I)
BMB report on 32nd meting of the committee for disarmament and
arms control on 20/01/83
Beermann (XV/3600/65)
11 files
7487 01/10/87 on scheduled British troops exercises in the field of military
management (wehrbereichsverwaltung)
7092 21/07//86
(ERFURT XV)
scheduled military exercises in Duesseldorf
6451 02/01/85
(ERFURT XV)
Defense related plans for NATO Terloh and arrangement of the Federal
Defence Minister
6450 02/01/85
(ERFURT XV)
Search for outside landing striops for “Harrier” type airplanes
5820 09/11/83
(ERFURT XV)
NATO air base Guetersloh and actions for stationing of missiles and
cruise missiles in the FRG
5514 Construction of alternative airports for des NATO-airbase Guetersloh for
the troop exercise territory (Truppenuebungsplatz Senne)
5474 12/11/82
(ERFURT XV)
regrouping of units of British Rhine army
5177 14/06/82
(ERFURT XV)
planned major mil. Manoeuvres and first assess. of a high ranked
officer from the Federal defence ministry
Siegel (XV/2105/73)
1973/1986
11 files
6796 04/12/85
(HVA/XI)
studies, further to the annual meeting of the section for military studies
of the international studies association, 7-9/11/85, university of Illinois.
5980 10/01/84
(HVA/XI)
private views of US INF delegation leader, Paul Nitze, on the
problematic of INF negotiations
Brede (MfS/13864/60)
1960/1986
9 files
6947 24/02/86
(HVA/I)
Blue paper, year VIII/nr 1
6046 08/03/84
(HVA/I)
Blue paper, Year XIV, nr 1 and enclosures nr 192, 193
Florian (XV/3690/74)
1974/1985
9 files
5634 16/03/83
(HVA/IX)
GB 1982 annual report of London defence attache
5587 19/01/83
(HVA/IX)
Disarmament Andropov’s speech on 21 Dec.
Erich (XV/47/68)
1968/1986
8 files
7028 30/04/86
(HVA/XI)
NATO doc on 02/04/86 – AC/225 (Panel VII/ASP) n/43
7027 30/04/86
(HVA/XI)
NATO doc. On 01/04/86 – AC/243 – D/1064
6899 03/01/86
(HVA/XI)
NATO doc. From 15/11/85 – Ac/225 (Panel VII/GEC) D/13
6659 30/07/85
(HVA/IX)
NATO doc from 28/06/85, AC/225 (Panel VII/ASP) N/36
6683 27/08/85
(HVA/XI)
NATO doc dated 07/08/85 – AC/225 (Panel VII/NSP) N/31
6267 06/11/84
(HVA/XI)
NATO doc V 12/10/84 – AC/225 (Panel VII / NSP) N/27
5579 17/01/83
(HVA/XI)
NATO doc. Dated 17/11/82, AC/225 (Panel VII) WP/170
Siegfried (XV/1677/69)
1969/1987
7 files
7319 20/02/87
(HVA/IV)
needs for FOFA studies
6769 08/11/85
(HVA/IV)
military operational research symposium in GB
Mark (XV/381/65)
1965/1989
7 files
7591 16/05/89 British Defence white book 1989
7520 20/11/87 PID document of the UK foreign ministry on assess. Of “communist
policy and tactic”
7373 24/04/87 PID document from the British Emb. In India
6199 03/08/84
(HVA/I)
NATO group at KVAE
Thomas (XV/2784/72)
1989
7 files
7586 10/05/89 proposals to the UK government on change of COCOM decisions
7433 30/06/87 British sovietologist on politic of the soviet union towards Western
Europe
Mosel (XV/333/69) Ursela Lorenzen, Nato official.
1969/1982
7 files
5376 09/09/82
(HVA/XII)
NATO info – Spain’s admission in NATO
5370 09/09/82
(HVA/XII)
NATo information, position and views of West European NATO members
on economic policy of Reagan’s administration
5109 19/04/82
(HVA/XII)
NATO info NATO doc. C-M (82) 13 – situation in Africa southern from
Sahara
5030 07/04/82
(HVA/XII)
NATO doc. DRC/DS (82) 4 – Conclusions sheet of the meeting of
defence verification committee
4980 18/02/82
(HVA/XII)
NATO defence planning symposium 1982 in Oberammergau (18-
21/01/82) Document DRC/N (82) 1
4797 24/11/81
(HVA/XII)
Art. 5 Annex 2 NATO doc. DRC/WP (81) 1 – UK
Heinz (IV/679/69)
1969/1987
7 files
5216 23/04/82
(HVA/AG
Grenze)
info on views of British Minister for Berlin and WB ruling governors on
relations with the GDR – on Reagan’s forthcoming visit & Us policy
towards Cuba
5214 12/05/82
(HVA/AG
Grenze)
info on conversations on current political pbs during dinner (lunch)
hosted by representative of US Foreign Minister Stoessel on 08/05/82
in WB, as well as speech of IHK president Elfe at the end of conf. on
transportation
5018 16/04/82
(HVA/AG
Grenze)
info. On views of the US Emb to the FRG, Arthur Burns, close circle on
the Falkland conflict
4847 09/12/81
(HVA/AG
Grenze)
info on views of the President of the WB chamber of commerce and
industry and of the UK Amb. in Bonn on Breschnew’s visit in the FRG
and on planned joint meeting with Chancellor Schmidt and Gen.
Honecker
Lutz (XV/1218/72) res 201
1972/1987
7 files
7312 12/02/87 Report from bertrand Russell Foundation on meeting in Brussels of
Liaison Committee
5096 27/05/82
(HVA/III)
on activities of the Romanian Emb. on British Peace organisations
Schwert (XV/3031/78)
1978/1987
6 files
7512 02/11/87
(HVA/III/B)
documents from Arab League on the Gulf conflict and international
issues
7489 02/10/87
(HVA/III/B)
situation in the Gulf (internal document form the Arab league).
Smaragd (XV/3365/71)
1971/1986
6 files
7371 23/04/87 material from the German Atom Forum for period February to April
1987.
7297 02/02/87 material from DATF winter meeting on 27-28/01/87 in Bonn
6963 19/03/86
(19/03/86)
material from the German Atom forum
6759 00/11/85
(HVA/II)
2 materials on Brut reaktor SNR 300 – from BMFT
5709 08/06/83
(HVA/II)
material from German Atom forum
Hilde (XV/1643/75)
1975/1987
6 files
6295 03/12/84
(HVA/XII)
program planning 1985 of the Konrad Adenauer Stiftung office for
international co-operation
6022 14/02/84
(HVA/XII)
annual report 1982-1983 of K. Adenauer Stiftung London office for CDU
central
6021 14/02/84
(HVA/XII)
annual report 1982-83 of K. Adenauer Stiftung Brussels office for CDU
central.
Helfried (XV/17/79) Reiner Oschmann, Neues Deutschland correspondent
1979/1983
5 files
5112 30/04/82
(HVA/III)
info on stance and development of relations between NATO and South
Africa
5056 28/04/82
(HVA/III)
planned anti-GDR activities in GB
4950 16/01/82
(HVA/III)
on the position of the UK CP towards Poland
Komet (MfS/15996/60) Journalist Karl-Heinz Maier (1923-1994)
1960/1986
6 files
statements of John Kornblum – head of US mission in West Berlin.
6763 04/11/85
(HVA/II)
on basis and influence of Lonrho – konzern in Zimbabwe
6211 10/08/84
(HVA/II)
views of leading employee of London FCO on current aspects of
FRG/GDR relations
5034 20/04/82
(HVA/II)
views of FRG Amb. in GB on the Falkland conflict and on situation of
Tory government

DOWNLOAD ORIGINAL DOCUMENT HERE

hvasira5

Spy Chief of the STASI – Markus Wolf

Doc. 4 of 6
OTHER AGENTS:
Amsel
Registration nr: XV/4229/83
Start of activities: 1983 (-1987)
5 files
7093: 25/07/86 (HVA/III)
letter of the British FM Howe to Oliver Tambo
7034: 07/05/86 (HVA/III)
internal information of the British secret services to the ANC on negotiations
perspectives of the BOTHA regime with the liberation movement and reaction of the
ANC
Ahmed
Registration nr: XV/2962/78
Start of activities: 1978 (-1987)
132 files
7477: 08/09/87
93 material from the German Atom forum for period May-Aug. 1987.
7048: 23/05/86 (HVA/III)
on bomb attack on the German-Arab society and on night-club “La Belle” in West Berlin
5084: 30/04/82 (HVA/III)
info. from AA Bonn service on concept of “Raumdeckende” defence, participation of
foreign civil servants in the FRG elections, UNEP extraordinary meeting in Nairobi in
March 82, EU/Greenland, Carrington’s trip to Asia
5078: 13/04/82 (HVA/III)
Mitterrand’s visit in Israel and EUP’s activities in the Middle-East
5036: 16/04/82
Foreign policy activities of the FRG government (FRG summit consultations), GB in
March 1982, the FRG position at the Madrid meeting, Shagari’s visit in the FRG,
European Council meeting in March 1982.
4940: 22/01/82 (HVA/III)
info AA service / Nov. 1982
4875: 17/12/81 (HVA/III)
current questions of the FRG foreign policy – consultation FRG/Tchekoslovakia –
FRG/GB – European Council ministerial meeting – sessions of EUP
4816: 19/11/81 (HVA/III)
Saudi Arabia 8-point plan – Israel/NSA relations
4736: 18/09/81 (HVA/III)
Information – Foreign Ministry (yellow service)
Gerald
Dr Gabriele Gast (1969-90), research director of BND.
Registration nr: XV/378/68
Start of activities: 1968 (-1987)
96 files
7503: 16/10/87
discussions with UK minister Mellor
7465: 20/08/87
conversations between Genscher and Howe
7156: 29/10/86 (HVA/IX)
British and Belgian papers on WEU issues
7155: 27/10/86 (HVA/IX)
HLTF – British contribution to chapter VI
7116: 15/08/86 (HVA/IX)
KVAE – British thoughts on a “KVAE Committee” for verification purposes
7005: 21/04/86 (HVA/XII)
SDI experiment: “Teal Ruby”
6942: 17/02/86 (HVA/IX)
UK/US memorandum on UK contribution to SDI (06/12)
6195: 26/07/84 (HVA/AG K)
KVAE – 2nd round
6194: 26/07/84
NATO consultations on strategic defence initiative
5086: 23/04/82 (KARL MARX XV)
“4 meeting” of political directors on 08/03/82 in Washington
4967: 12/03/82 (KARL MARX XV)
information of NATO Council on INF negotiations through Amb. Glitman on 29/01/82
Gerhard
Registration nr: XV/4607/75
Start of activities: 1975 (-1987)
57 files
7398: 25/05/87
Report form DRG (AC/243) Panel II V on 18-19/02/87
7339: 20/03/87
Telegram from the US Emb. In Bonn to Washington among other things on SPD
problematic
7293: 23/01/87
informal British assess. On Tornado combat aircraft ( from managing Director of British
Aerospace Warton division)
7135: 30/09/86 (HVA/III)
secret tour of inspection of congressman Ray on NATO bases
7044
NATO navy-nuclear armament group, meeting AC/141 (IEG/2) SG/5 Torpedos
7043: 16/05/86
NATO/CNAD meeting (nunn initiative), project of MIDS development, 10-11/04/86
6962: 18/03/86 (HVA/XI)
US-Vorhaben on meeting of NATO national armament directors on 27/02/86
6766: 05/11/85 (HVA/XI)
NATO CNAD (nationale Rüstungsdirektion d Nato = ??) on 16/09/85
6668: 02/08/85 (HVA/XI)
final proposals, 4 countries, conclusions on armaments co-operation on 03/06/85
6667: 02/08/85 (HVA/XI)
NATO High Level group / conference report from 01/07/85
6570: 19/04/85 (HVA/XI)
US docs on Advisory 4 groups of National armaments directors on 20-22/03/85
6569: 19/04/85 (HVA/XI)
preparation – recommendations of the 4 groups of representative of the National
armaments Directors on 12-14/06/85 (US, FRG, GB, FR)
6568
UK stance on NATO doc / improvement of armaments co-operation
6567: 19/04/85 (HVA/XI)
decision sheet of council of 4 groups of armaments directors on 9-10/10/84 in
Toulouse
6566: 19/04/85 (HVA/XI)
docs for council of 4 groups of armaments directors on 12-14/12/84 in Englin, AFB,
Florida
6565: 19/04/85
UK stance on co-operation between NATO armaments industries.
6564: 19/04/85
US/FRG drafts for diiscussion of common production of MLRS (Mehrfachraketenwerfer)
components
6563: 19/04/85 (HVA/XI)
docs of the 4 groups council on 20-22/03/85 (Armaments directors USA, FRG, GB. FR)
6483: 05/02/85
NATO co-operation in the development of nuclear heads for MLRS
6464: 11/01/85
FRG and UK positions in NATO-related questioning of double role fragender doppelrolle
(nuclear / conventional) – High Level Group
6457: 08/01/85 (HVA/XI)
summit meeting of 7 experts from expert group on territoriality questions on 19/09/84
6232: 12/09/84 (HVA/XI)
10th meeting of NATO committee for air defense weapons system
6093: 25/04/84 (HVA/XII)
NATO information, doc C-VR (83) 58 – protocol of NATO NAC at ministerial level from
December 1983
6013: 06/02/84 (HVA/XI)
security assistance co-production projects / status report
5794: 17/10/83
NADREP meeting / NATO on 09/09/83
5572: 05/01/83 (HVA/XI)
monthly report
5744: 10/08/83 (HVA/XI)
on Gold Fire 83
5743: 10/08/83
on spring training 1984
5707: 03/06/83 (HVA/XI)
report from US Emb. on security agreement with Austria
5417: 14/09/82 (HVA/XI)
travel and visit activities of US mil. personnel
5375: 14/09/82 (HVA/XI)
presentation, UK representative to NATO, on the Falkland conflict on 22/07/82
5374: 14/09/82
reflection for the establishment of a NATO-Raketenschiessplatzes in GB as substitute
for Kreta
5105: 12/03/82 (HVA/III)
documents of the meeting of “Frontstaaten” on their positions on the Namibia issue
and on RSA policy on the Namibia issue
4921: 04/02/82 (HVA/XI)
training co-operation and disarmament US/FRG/GB
4772: 21/10/81 (HVA/XI)
medical surveillance of US personnel in GB
Harry
Registration nr: XV/381/69
Start of activities: 1969/1987
56 files
7164: 06/11/86 (HVA/I)
Blue paper nr. 10/XVIII
6987: 09/04/86 (HVA/I)
KVAE – 8th round
6986: 09/04/86 (HVA/I)
MBFR
6900: 03/01/86 (HVA/I)
MBFR – Vienna
6727: Extraordinary session of EU Council pol. Committee on 23-24/08/85 & EPZministerial
meeting on 10/09/85
6725: 17/10/85
KVAE – NATO Caucasus, speeches during conference, strategic papers
6724: 17/10/85 (HVA/I)
KVAE – plenary session, working groups and weekly assess.
6624: 19/06/85 (BERLIN ABT XV)
internal konzern data about 1985 investments activities & Schering AG market strategy
6650: 18/07/85 (HVA/I)
NATO group within KVAE and western consultations
6649: 18/07/85 (HVA/I)
KVAE working groups
6685: 10/09/85 (BERLIN ABT XV)
COCOM lists, UK trade ministry
6549: 10/04/85 (HVA/I)
MBFR plenary sessions in Vienna
6547: 10/04/85 (HVA/I)
KVAE session in working groups in Feb./March 1985
6546: 10/04/85 (HVA/I)
KVAE plenary sessions (5th round)
6453: 04/01/85
146 political committee, on 8-9/11/84 in Dublin
6257: 30/10/84 (BERLIN ABT XV)
Konzern internal protocol – commercial and structural files – Schering AG
Adler
Ludwig Pauli, official in the German foreign ministry.
Registration nr: MfS/15905/60
Start of activities: 1960/1987
54 files
7497: 12/10/87
yellow brochure (Heft) nr 1050
7468: 24/08/87
Yellow “Brochure” nr 1048
7445: 10/07/87
yellow brochure nr 1046
7444: 10/07/87
Yellow brochure nr 1045 and attachment
7346: 26/03/87
yellow brochure nr 1044
7345: 26/03/87
yellow paper nr 1043
7298: 04/02/87
Blue paper nr. 12
6985: (HVA/I)
yellow brochure nr. 1033
6932: 06/02/86 (HVA/I)
yellow brochure nr 1030
6805: 09/12/85 (HVA/I)
yellow brochure nr. 1029
6804: 09/12/85 (HVA/I)
Blue paper nr 14
6661: 30/07/85
yellow paper nr 1024
6504: 27/02/85 (HVA/I)
yellow paper nr 1018
6503: 27/02/85
Blue paper nr 14/84
6308: 10/12/84 (HVA/I)
Blue paper nr 12
6243: 08/10/84
yellow paper nr 1016
6242: 08/10/84
Blue paper 9/84
6197: 01/08/84
yellow paper nr 1014
6147: 08/06/84 (HVA/I)
Blue paper nr 6 – enclosures nr 198, 199
6010: 03/02/84
yellow paper nr 9
6008: 03/02/84
yellow paper nr 8
5804: 25/10/83
yellow paper nr 1005
5674: 02/05/83
country profile GB
5673: 02/05/83 (HVA/I)
Yellow paper nr 1000
5672: 02/05/83 (HVA/I)
yellow paper nr 999
5551: 29/12/82 (HVA/I)
yellow paper nr 996
5515: 17/11/82 (HVA/I)
Info from Foreign Office Bonn on results of détente policy, strategic discussions within
NATO, security-political aspects of technological transfer in the USSR, Comments on
Ustman, OAU Summit Conf. in Tripoli, contract FRG/Mozambique with Land Berlin
Kleinsel, GATT minister conf., US discussions on natural gas commerce. EU agriculture
policy, UNESCO world culture conf., War Graves Commission for Eastern Europe report
from co-ordinator for German-American relations
5422: 19/08/82 (HVA/I)
yellow paper nr 993
5415: 15/10/82
GB
5399: 08/07/82
yellow paper nr 991
5360: 19/08/82
yellow paper nr 992
5286: 09/07/82
Falkland conflict
5225: 16/04/82 (HVA/I)
Information – service of AA Bonn on West German/US relations, participation of 4 EU
states to MFO in Sinai, Ireland’s position on EU solidarity, efforts to re-activate the
WEU
5211: 21/05/82 (HVA/I)
GB
5210: 19/05/82 (HVA/I)
GB
5166
yellow paper nr 988
5077: 18/02/82
Yellow paper nr 987
5035: 27/04/82
GB in Foreign Ministry Bonn in April 1982 / FRG Emb. in London
4932: 08/01/82 (HVA/I)
yellow paper nr 985
4917: 13/01/82
EU
4897: 13/01/82 (HVA/I)
British oil policy
Dreher
Registration nr: XV/2427/74
Start of activities: 1974/1984
43 files
5736: 26/07/83 (HVA/III)
on British sys. civilian defence
5638: 17/03/83 (HVA/III)
trimestrial report on political-economic situation in the GDR
5484: 18/11/82 (HVA/III)
on the forthcoming meeting of GB/GDR GRK on 29/11-01/12/82
4559: 23/05/81 (HVA/III)
on a working paper from the British industry trade union on foreign trade strategy and
the five-year plan
4405: 27/03/81 (HVA/III)
study from the National Westminster Bank on theme: reflection on trade policy
Konrad
Registration nr: XV/2148/72
Start of activities: 1972/1989
35 files
7595: 26/05/89
UK Ambassador in the FRG on “German issues”, British views
6968: 21/03/86(HVA/AG K)
from the British Emb. On SUCP XXVII Party Day
6912: 17/01/86 (HVA/AG K)
from the British Emb on GB/GDR relations
6747: 29/10/85 (HVA/AG K)
ON UK diplomat A. Lewis on work of East-European dept of British MfA
6478: 24/01/85 (HVA/AG K)
from UK Foreign Ministry and UK Emb. in the GDR on current issues
6041: 02/03/84 (HVA/XI)
PID-Objektes study, institute for East-West security studies, NY on GB security policy
5685: 11/05/83 (HVA/XI)
on some planned activities of the committee for European nuclear disarmament and
the institute for defence and disarmament studies in Boston 1983
5729: 08/07/83 (HVA/AG K)
from British Emb. on Kohl’s visit to Moscow and on internal political developments in
the GDR
5491: 27/11/82 (HVA/AG K)
British diplomats on Youth evolution in the USSR
4866: 18/12/81 (HVA/AG K)
on Schmidt/Honecker meeting, views of the UK Emb. in the GDR
4494: 09/04/81 (HVA/AG K)
views of the British Foreign Ministry on issues related to Poland and on FRG/GDR
relations and WB related pbs
4439: 14/04/81 (HVA/AG K)
first assess. of 10th Party Day by a leading employee of the British Emb.
4394: 24/02/81 (HVA/AG K)
leading employee from the British Embassy in the GDR on Honecker’s closing speech at
a SED [Bezirkdelegiertenkonferenz] in Berlin
Doc. 4 of 6