“This Is a War Crime”: The Secret Memo That Warned Bush His CIA Was Breaking the LawโAnd How They Made It Disappear
EXCLUSIVE: TOP SECRET Zelikow Memo Reveals White House Knew Torture Was Illegal, Ordered Evidence Destroyed
Support independent investigative journalism: patreon.com/berndpulch
The Memo They Tried to Burn
In February 2006, a senior Bush administration official sat down and wrote something extraordinary: a TOP SECRET memorandum warning that the CIA’s “enhanced interrogation” program was a breach of U.S. war crimes law. The author was Philip Zelikow, counselor to Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice and a respected historian who would later lead the 9/11 Commission.
His audience: the National Security Council’s Principals Committeeโthe most powerful national security body in the U.S. government, including the Vice President, Secretary of Defense, CIA Director, and Attorney General.
His conclusion: The CIA’s physical abuse of detainees was illegal. Period.
The Bush administration’s response? They rejected his legal analysisโand ordered every copy of the memo destroyed.
But one draft survived. Hidden in State Department files, it was declassified in 2012. What it reveals is a story of conscience, cover-up, and the bureaucratic archaeology of crimes.
Support our work and access exclusive documents: patreon.com/berndpulch
The Legal Warning That Couldn’t Be Allowed to Exist
Zelikow’s February 15, 2006 memo arrived at a critical moment. The CIA’s torture programโwaterboarding, sleep deprivation, stress positions, and “walling” (slamming detainees against walls)โwas under internal strain. The 2005 Detainee Treatment Act had just passed, and the Supreme Court’s Hamdan v. Rumsfeld decision had thrown the legal basis for military commissions into question.
Zelikow, a former prosecutor and law professor, saw what others in the administration refused to acknowledge: The CIA’s methods weren’t just morally wrongโthey were legally indefensible.
His memo argued that:
- The Geneva Conventions’ Common Article 3โwhich prohibits “cruel treatment and torture” and “outrages upon personal dignity”โapplied to all CIA detainees
- The War Crimes Act of 1996 made violations of Common Article 3 a federal felony punishable by up to life imprisonment
- The CIA’s “enhanced interrogation techniques” likely constituted “cruel treatment” under international law
- No presidential authorization could legalize war crimes
This was heresy in Cheney’s Washington.
Join our Patreon for early access to classified document analysis: patreon.com/berndpulch
The Destruction Order
According to multiple reports, the Bush White Houseโparticularly Vice President Dick Cheney’s office and the CIAโreacted to Zelikow’s memo with fury. Here was a senior administration official, cleared at the highest levels, declaring that the President’s signature interrogation program made everyone involved criminally liable.
The response wasn’t debate. It wasn’t legal review. It was erasure.
The administration ordered all copies of Zelikow’s memo destroyed. Officials were directed to retrieve and eliminate every version from State Department, CIA, and White House files. The goal: to ensure no prosecutor, no court, no congressional investigator could ever prove that the White House had been explicitly warned its torture program was illegal.
One copy survived. A draft remained in State Department archives, overlooked in the purge. It sat there for six years until declassification in 2012, finally entering the public record for the world to see.
Help us uncover more suppressed documents: patreon.com/berndpulch
Why This Memo Matters More Than Ever
Proof of Consciousness of Guilt
The destruction order is the smoking gun. In criminal law, consciousness of guiltโtaking steps to hide evidenceโdemonstrates awareness of wrongdoing. Ordering the destruction of a legal memo warning of war crimes isn’t “policy disagreement.” It’s cover-up of crimes.
The Torture Architects Knew
Zelikow sent his memo to the Principals Committeeโmeaning Cheney, Rumsfeld, CIA Director Porter Goss, Attorney General Alberto Gonzales, and Condoleezza Rice all received explicit warning that the CIA program violated U.S. war crimes law. They chose to continue the program and destroy the warning.
Obama’s Failure to Prosecute
When the Zelikow memo was declassified in 2012, it provided prima facie evidence that senior Bush officials knowingly authorized torture despite legal warnings. The Obama administration, which had promised to “look forward, not backward,” declined to prosecute. The memo became a historical document rather than evidence in a criminal case.
Precedent for Impunity
The Zelikow memo’s suppression established a template: Classify legal warnings. Destroy inconvenient documents. Declare “national security.” This patternโseen in the CIA torture tapes destruction (2005), the NSA warrantless surveillance cover-ups, and the Abu Ghraib accountability failuresโhas eroded the rule of law in national security policy.
Patreon supporters get exclusive access to our full archive: patreon.com/berndpulch
What the Memo Actually Said
While the full text remains partially redacted, Zelikow’s core argument was devastating in its simplicity:
The Geneva Conventions apply. The War Crimes Act applies. The CIA’s methods violate both. Therefore, U.S. officials are committing federal felonies.
Zelikow specifically addressed the administration’s favorite legal escape hatchโthe claim that “enhanced interrogation” wasn’t torture because it didn’t cause “severe physical or mental pain” lasting months or years. He countered that Common Article 3’s prohibition on “cruel treatment” had a lower threshold and clearly covered waterboarding, stress positions, and sleep deprivation.
He also demolished the “necessity” defenseโthe argument that torture was justified to prevent terrorist attacks. Under the War Crimes Act, Zelikow noted, necessity is no defense for violations of Common Article 3.
The Man Who Wrote It
Philip Zelikow is no radical. He’s a Republican, a former Navy officer, a Harvard Law graduate, and the executive director of the 9/11 Commissionโhardly a profile in anti-government activism. His memo was the product of a conservative national security professional doing his job: telling the truth about the law.
After the memo’s existence became public, Zelikow confirmed its contents and described the administration’s reaction. He noted that his legal analysis was “not welcome” and that senior officials made clear that only the Office of Legal Counsel’s pro-torture memosโauthored by John Yoo and Jay Bybeeโwere to be considered valid.
The Yoo-Bybee memos, later withdrawn by the Obama Justice Department as legally defective, had authorized torture by redefining it out of existence. Zelikow’s memo, which accurately interpreted the law, was suppressed because it was correct.
Support our investigative team: patreon.com/berndpulch
Conclusion: The Crime That Outlived Its Cover-Up
The Bush administration’s torture program ended in 2009. The Zelikow memo was declassified in 2012. No one has been prosecuted for the torture itself, or for the destruction of evidence warning about it.
But the memo endures. It sits in the public record, accessible to anyone who seeks it, proving that someone in power knew and tried to stop it. It proves that the destruction order was an admission of guilt. And it proves that the legal warnings were accurateโthe CIA’s interrogation program was a war crime under U.S. law.
The question remains: If a TOP SECRET memo warning of war crimes can be ordered destroyed, and no one is held accountable, what else has been burned?
This article is based on declassified government documents and investigative reporting. The allegations contained in the Zelikow memo were contested by the Bush administration at the time.
๐ BERND PULCH ARCHIVE | SECURE MIRROR 