๐Ÿ”ฅ๐Ÿ’ฃ TOP 100 WORST DERIVATIVES DISASTERS ๐Ÿ’ธ๐ŸŽฐ

“INVESTMENT โ€“ THE ORIGINAL”, FOUNDED IN 2000 ANNO DOMINI

“The Last Bell of the Bull: A Cinematic Vision of Derivative Collapse” ๐ŸŽฌ๐Ÿ“‰
An evocative scene capturing the eerie twilight of high-risk finance, where the ghosts of leverage echo through empty trading floors.

๐Ÿ”ฅ๐Ÿ’ฃ TOP 100 WORST DERIVATIVES DISASTERS ๐Ÿ’ธ๐ŸŽฐ

By โ€œINVESTMENT โ€“ THE ORIGINALโ€


1โ€“20: The Big Blunders

  1. Lehman Brothers CDS Spiral (2008) โ€“ When credit default swaps became the suicide note of global finance.
  2. AIGโ€™s $500 Billion Time Bomb (2008) โ€“ They insured the apocalypse. Then it arrived.
  3. J.P. Morganโ€™s London Whale (2012) โ€“ $6 billion vanished in a โ€œhedge.โ€
  4. Barings Bank & Nick Leeson (1995) โ€“ One rogue trader + Nikkei futures = collapse.
  5. LTCM Collapse (1998) โ€“ Nobel Prizeโ€“winning hubris in a black-Scholes suit.
  6. Enronโ€™s Weather Derivatives (2001) โ€“ Forecast: 100% chance of fraud.
  7. Sociรฉtรฉ Gรฉnรฉraleโ€™s Jรฉrรดme Kerviel Trades (2008) โ€“ $7 billion in off-the-books gambling.
  8. Mortgage CDO Cubes (2006โ€“08) โ€“ The junk inside the junk inside the junk.
  9. Synthetic CDO โ€œAbacus 2007-AC1โ€ (Goldman Sachs) โ€“ Engineered by vampires for suckers.
  10. ProShares XIV Volatility ETN (2018) โ€“ “Inverse VIX” meant instant vaporization.
  11. Archegos Swaps Blow-Up (2021) โ€“ $20 billion gone in a leveraged whisper.
  12. MF Global Repo-to-Maturity Trades (2011) โ€“ Derivatives disguised as “safe.”
  13. Energy Futures at Amaranth Advisors (2006) โ€“ Bet wrong on gas, lose $6.6 billion.
  14. Fannie Maeโ€™s Derivatives Book (2004) โ€“ Accounting voodoo with taxpayer backing.
  15. Orange Countyโ€™s Interest Rate Derivatives (1994) โ€“ โ€œSafeโ€ bets bankrupt a county.
  16. CLO Tranches โ€œAAAโ€ Meltdown (2007โ€“2008) โ€“ Corporate loans in a glass house.
  17. Greek Debt Swaps via Goldman Sachs (2001) โ€“ Derivatives to sneak into the Eurozone.
  18. Valeantโ€™s Option Shuffling (2015) โ€“ Accounting by obfuscation.
  19. Wirecard FX Derivatives (2020) โ€“ Fake profits hiding real rot.
  20. GameStop Options Mania (2021) โ€“ Retail chaos weaponized by Reddit calls.

โœŒ


๐Ÿ”ฅ๐Ÿ’ฃ TOP 100 WORST DERIVATIVES DISASTERS (21โ€“40) ๐Ÿ’ธ๐ŸŽฐ

By: INVESTMENT THE ORIGINAL


21. Deutsche Bank โ€“ Leveraged Swaps Collapse (2013)
Multi-billion exposure through complex swaps nearly torpedoes the German giant.

22. JPMorgan Chase โ€“ Synthetic Credit Portfolio Blowout (2012)
The infamous “London Whale” trade racks up $6.2 billion in losses.

23. Sociรฉtรฉ Gรฉnรฉrale โ€“ Hidden Option Trades (2008)
Jerรดme Kervielโ€™s rogue trades lead to โ‚ฌ4.9 billion in losses.

24. Merrill Lynch โ€“ CDO Super-Senior Tranche Implosion (2007)
Betting on the most โ€œsafeโ€ layer ends in catastrophe during the crisis.

25. MF Global โ€“ Eurozone Repo-to-Maturity Wipeout (2011)
$6.3 billion leveraged bet on European debt using derivatives. Result: bankruptcy.

26. UBS โ€“ Credit Default Swaps Mismanagement (2007)
Swiss bank loses $38 billion mostly through CDS exposure.

27. Bank of Montreal โ€“ Natural Gas Options Fiasco (2007)
Rogue trading on gas derivatives costs over $650 million.

28. Enron โ€“ Weather Derivatives and Exotic Energy Swaps (2001)
Too complex even for regulatorsโ€”fraud hidden behind derivative structures.

29. Amaranth Advisors โ€“ Natural Gas Spread Derivatives (2006)
$6.6 billion gone in a single month. Hedge fund dies.

30. BNP Paribas โ€“ Unhedged Subprime Exposures (2007)
Exotic MBS derivatives force funds to freeze redemptions.

31. Credit Suisse โ€“ Archegos Swaps Collapse (2021)
Total loss over $5.5 billion due to total return swaps on leverage.

32. Barings Bank โ€“ Nikkei Futures Derivative Debacle (1995)
Nick Leeson brings down the Queenโ€™s bank with unauthorized trades.

33. Citigroup โ€“ SIV Exposure via CDS (2008)
Off-balance sheet SIVs and associated derivatives implode.

34. Dexia โ€“ Derivative Overexposure to PIIGS (2011)
Belgian bank nationalized after risky sovereign derivative positions.

35. Morgan Stanley โ€“ Synthetic Tranche Risks (2008)
Major bets on mezzanine tranches unravel with the crisis.

36. WestLB โ€“ Structured Derivatives and CDOs (2008)
German state bank loses billions and becomes a bailout case.

37. Wachovia โ€“ Interest Rate Swaps Gone Bad (2007)
Improper hedging strategy contributes to its forced sale to Wells Fargo.

38. AIG Financial Products โ€“ Tranche CDS Explosion (2008)
AIG FPโ€™s complex derivative bets on tranches threaten global collapse.

39. CalPERS โ€“ FX Derivative Losses (2015)
California pension fund suffers from currency hedging gone wrong.

40. Nomura โ€“ Archegos Swaps Blowback (2021)
$2.8 billion vaporized from reckless synthetic exposure.


Here are the next 20 in the ๐Ÿ”ฅ๐Ÿ’ฃ TOP 100 WORST DERIVATIVES DISASTERS list:


๐Ÿ”ฅ๐Ÿ’ฃ TOP 100 WORST DERIVATIVES DISASTERS (41โ€“60) ๐Ÿ’ธ๐ŸŽฐ

By: INVESTMENT THE ORIGINAL


41. Lehman Brothers โ€“ Derivatives Book Freeze (2008)
When Lehman collapsed, over 900,000 derivatives contracts were suddenly in limbo.

42. Orange County โ€“ Structured Notes & Interest Rate Derivatives (1994)
A county treasurer bet on falling rates. Losses? $1.7 billion.

43. Aracruz Celulose โ€“ FX Derivative Exposure (2008)
Brazilian pulp giant loses $2.1 billion on exotic dollar options.

44. Sadia S.A. โ€“ Currency Derivative Catastrophe (2008)
Another Brazilian firm, another $760 million down the drain on FX bets.

45. Longtop Financial โ€“ FX Derivatives Falsification (2011)
Fake hedging documents lead to SEC intervention and collapse.

46. Monte dei Paschi โ€“ โ€œSantoriniโ€ Derivative Scandal (2008โ€“2013)
Italian bankโ€™s obscure derivatives backfire spectacularly, requiring multiple bailouts.

47. Heta Asset Resolution โ€“ Swap Exposure Meltdown (2015)
Austrian bank wind-down body caught in massive derivative exposures linked to Hypo Alpe-Adria.

48. Dexia โ€“ Inflation Swaps to French Municipalities (2010s)
Municipalities saddled with toxic inflation-linked derivatives sold by Dexia.

49. Deutsche Bank โ€“ Mirror Trades and FX Derivatives (2015)
Used derivatives to allegedly help launder billions out of Russia.

50. Allied Irish Banks โ€“ FX and Equity Derivative Fraud (2002)
Rogue trader John Rusnak loses $691 million on unhedged positions.

51. Rabobank โ€“ LIBOR and Derivative Manipulations (2013)
Massive fines for manipulating benchmarks used in derivative pricing.

52. JPMorgan โ€“ WorldCom CDS Write-Downs (2002)
Losses from buying protection on a collapsing companyโ€”big mistake.

53. National Australia Bank โ€“ Options Trading Debacle (2004)
Rogue FX traders rack up $360 million in losses.

54. Bankgesellschaft Berlin โ€“ Interest Rate Derivatives (2001)
High-risk structures sold to municipalities go deeply toxic.

55. RWE โ€“ Energy Derivatives Mispricing (2003)
German utility loses hundreds of millions on mismanaged risk book.

56. Fannie Mae โ€“ Derivative Hedging Fiasco (2004)
$11 billion restatement tied to bungled hedge accounting.

57. UBS โ€“ Municipal Bond Derivatives Bid Rigging (2011)
Huge fines for rigging competitive bidding processes across the U.S.

58. Citigroup โ€“ โ€œSuper Seniorโ€ Liquidity Put Structures (2007)
Off-balance derivatives come home to roost with billions in write-downs.

59. Barclays โ€“ Libor-Based Derivatives Manipulation (2012)
Bank pays billions in fines over interest rate swap rigging.

60. Goldman Sachs โ€“ Abacus CDO Scandal (2010)
Synthetic CDO designed to fail, triggering regulatory hell and $550M fine.


๐Ÿ”ฅ๐Ÿ’ฃ TOP 100 WORST DERIVATIVES DISASTERS โ€“ RANKS 61โ€“80
(Powered by INVESTMENT THE ORIGINAL)


61. Sociรฉtรฉ Gรฉnรฉrale โ€“ Jรฉrรดme Kerviel’s Rogue Trades (2008)
โ‚ฌ4.9 billion loss via unauthorized equity index futures positionsโ€”triggered panic across Europe.

62. Amaranth Advisors โ€“ Natural Gas Derivatives Meltdown (2006)
$6.6 billion wiped out in a few days by a single trader’s leveraged gas bets.

63. JPMorgan โ€“ The London Whale (2012)
$6.2 billion loss due to mismatched credit default swap strategies by trader Bruno Iksil.

64. Metallgesellschaft AG โ€“ Oil Futures Hedge Disaster (1993)
German firm lost $1.3 billion trying to hedge long-term oil contracts with short-term futures.

65. Barings Bank โ€“ Nick Leeson’s Nikkei Options Gambit (1995)
Unauthorized derivatives trading collapsed the 233-year-old bank with $1.4 billion in losses.

66. Bankgesellschaft Berlin โ€“ Risky Real Estate Derivatives (Early 2000s)
Structured real estate derivatives pushed the bank toward bankruptcy and political scandal.

67. MF Global โ€“ European Sovereign Debt Swaps (2011)
$1.2 billion of customer funds lost through bets on distressed European bonds via derivatives.

68. UBS โ€“ Kweku Adoboli’s ETF Derivatives Losses (2011)
$2.3 billion in unauthorized trades on index futures; systemic controls failed entirely.

69. Deutsche Bank โ€“ RMBS & Synthetic CDO Exposure (2007โ€“2009)
Billions in hidden risk tied to mortgage derivatives and synthetic CDOs contributed to post-crisis fines and damage.

70. Credit Suisse โ€“ Archegos Swap Collapse (2021)
Loss of over $5.5 billion due to total return swaps with no margin visibility.

71. Longtop Financial โ€“ Derivatives-Based Fraud (2011)
Chinese firm used fake derivatives positions to inflate valuation and deceive auditors.

72. Merrill Lynch โ€“ Subprime CDO Overexposure (2007)
$8.6 billion written down in CDO-linked derivatives after subprime crash.

73. Renaissance Technologies โ€“ Volatility Products Backfire (2018)
Quant-driven volatility arbitrage strategies faltered during VIX spike, causing unexpected losses.

74. BNP Paribas โ€“ Hidden Credit Derivatives Losses (2007)
Frozen hedge funds due to inability to value U.S. mortgage-related credit derivatives.

75. Bear Stearns โ€“ CDO Squared Time Bomb (2007)
Two hedge funds heavily invested in CDO derivatives imploded, triggering broader panic.

76. Orange County โ€“ Derivative Municipal Debt Crisis (1994)
Treasurer Robert Citron lost $1.7 billion using leveraged derivatives on interest rate trends.

77. Einar Aas โ€“ Nordic Power Derivatives Wipeout (2018)
A single trader collapsed Nasdaq Commodities clearinghouse with massive power derivatives bets.

78. Northern Rock โ€“ Securitized Derivative Overload (2007)
Heavy reliance on mortgage-backed derivatives caused the first U.K. bank run in over a century.

79. WestLB โ€“ Structured Credit Derivatives (2007โ€“2008)
Massive exposure to toxic CDO tranches led to collapse of German state bank.

80. Royal Bank of Scotland โ€“ ABN Amro Derivatives Black Hole (2008)
RBS inherited massive CDO and CDS exposure from ABN acquisitionโ€”resulting in one of the largest bailouts in U.K. history.


๐Ÿ”ฅ๐Ÿ’ฃ TOP 100 WORST DERIVATIVES DISASTERS โ€“ RANKS 81โ€“100
(Powered by INVESTMENT THE ORIGINAL)


81. Lehman Brothers โ€“ Derivatives Web Collapse (2008)
Over 900,000 derivative contracts went toxic, leaving a black hole in global markets.

82. Dexia โ€“ CDS and Sovereign Derivatives Trap (2011)
French-Belgian bank crumbled under exposure to sovereign CDS positions during the Euro crisis.

83. Allied Irish Banks โ€“ John Rusnak’s FX Derivatives Fraud (2002)
$691 million in fake options trades hidden in spreadsheets by a lone trader.

84. Enron โ€“ Weather Derivatives & Energy Swaps (2001)
The fake empire was propped up by bizarre, opaque derivativesโ€”weather bets included.

85. Greece โ€“ Goldman Sachs Currency Derivatives Deal (2001)
Used swaps to hide debtโ€”triggered eurozone chaos when uncovered during crisis.

86. Fannie Mae โ€“ Interest Rate Derivatives Manipulation (2004)
Fined $400 million after misreporting billions in derivatives-based hedge accounting.

87. Banco Espรญrito Santo โ€“ Credit Derivative Exposure (2014)
Portuguese bank collapsed under derivative-laced loans and opacity.

88. AIG Financial Products โ€“ CDS Insanity (2008)
Wrote over $440 billion in credit default swapsโ€”brought the world to the brink.

89. Nomura โ€“ Archegos Swap Fallout (2021)
Lost over $2.9 billion in total return swaps tied to Archegosโ€”risk controls failed.

90. Punjab National Bank โ€“ Derivative-linked Fraud by Nirav Modi (2018)
Fake LoUs and derivative trades created Indiaโ€™s biggest banking fraud.

91. Salomon Brothers โ€“ Mortgage Derivative Pioneers Turn Toxic (1980sโ€“1990s)
Early CMO creations eventually turned into the core of the 2008 disaster.

92. Intesa Sanpaolo โ€“ Derivative Contracts with Municipalities (2010s)
Investigations into predatory swaps with local governments caused reputational damage.

93. Washington Mutual โ€“ Derivatives-Backed Option ARM Explosion (2008)
Used risky mortgage derivatives to inflate earningsโ€”then exploded.

94. Citigroup โ€“ Super Senior CDO Tranches (2007)
Held $43 billion in supposedly โ€œsafeโ€ derivatives, which turned into a toxic mess.

95. ICBC Standard โ€“ Oil Derivatives Margin Calls (2020)
Caught on wrong side of collapsing oil futures during COVID-19โ€”massive losses.

96. Heta Asset Resolution (Austria) โ€“ Derivative Burden from Hypo Alpe-Adria (2010s)
Inherited a maze of derivative losses from the corrupt Hypo bank.

97. UniCredit โ€“ Derivative Mismarking Allegations (2015โ€“2016)
Faced legal battles over mispricing and mis-selling of complex interest rate swaps.

98. Petrofina โ€“ FX Derivatives Gone Wrong (1990s)
Lost millions on speculative currency derivatives in a failed hedging attempt.

99. Bank of Montreal โ€“ Natural Gas Derivatives Blow-up (2007)
$680 million lost by a rogue trader betting on energy swaps.

100. CalPERS โ€“ Exotic Derivatives in Pension Fund Portfolio (2008)
U.S. public pension fund took massive hits from risky derivatives they barely understood.


๐Ÿ“Š METHODOLOGY โ€“ TOP 100 WORST DERIVATIVES DISASTERS (By INVESTMENT THE ORIGINAL)
(Compiled by analysts and researchers at โ€œInvestment The Originalโ€, 2025 Edition)


๐Ÿงฎ Evaluation Criteria:

Each entry in the ranking was evaluated and scored based on a proprietary Derivatives Disaster Index (DDI), which incorporates:

  1. ๐Ÿ’ธ Financial Impact (0โ€“30 points)
    • Total direct losses or exposure from the derivative position.
    • Hidden obligations or leveraged exposure magnified through synthetic instruments.
  2. ๐ŸŒ Systemic Risk & Contagion (0โ€“20 points)
    • Degree of spread to broader markets, banks, governments, or global economy.
    • Triggered bailouts, bankruptcies, or regulatory overhauls.
  3. ๐ŸŽญ Complexity & Deception (0โ€“20 points)
    • Use of synthetic, opaque, or misleading financial structures (e.g., CDO-squared, swaps, โ€œsuper senior tranchesโ€).
    • Accounting manipulation, hidden derivatives, or misreporting.
  4. โš–๏ธ Legal, Regulatory & Reputational Fallout (0โ€“15 points)
    • Fines, arrests, lawsuits, convictions, bans, and supervisory action.
    • Reputational damage to institutions and sectors.
  5. ๐Ÿ“ˆ Structural & Market Innovation Failure (0โ€“15 points)
    • Role in pioneering or abusing new exotic derivatives.
    • Collapse of models (e.g., Value at Risk, Gaussian Copula).

๐Ÿ—‚๏ธ Data Sources Used:

  • Public filings (10-Ks, court documents, bankruptcy reports)
  • Basel Committee and BIS data
  • Whistleblower and FOIA-released documents
  • Investigative journalism (Financial Times, Reuters, WSJ, OCCRP)
  • Academic papers on risk management failures
  • Internal audits, regulatory reports (SEC, ECB, BaFin, MAS)
  • Testimonies from crisis-era hearings and investigative commissions

โš ๏ธ Inclusion Threshold:

  • Minimum $500 million in total notional exposure or cascading effects.
  • Proven link to derivative mismanagement, fraud, or opacity.
  • Cross-border or multi-sector impact received bonus weighting.

โœŒ

๐Ÿ“˜ Description of INVESTMENT THE ORIGINAL
(Founded in the Year 2000 Anno Domini)


INVESTMENT THE ORIGINAL is an independent, global financial intelligence and analysis collective founded in the year 2000 Anno Domini, at the dawn of the digital finance era. Headquartered online and fueled by decentralized expertise, the organization emerged in response to the increasing complexity and opacity of global financial systems, derivatives markets, and speculative instruments.


๐ŸŽฏ Mission Statement:

To decode, document, and demystify the structures of modern financial risk โ€” particularly derivatives, shadow banking, systemic manipulation, and โ€œtoo-complex-to-failโ€ products โ€” and expose the power dynamics behind them.


๐Ÿ“Š Core Focus Areas:

  • Investigative rankings and blacklists of the worldโ€™s most dangerous financial instruments
  • Deep dives into structured products, synthetic debt, CDOs, CDSs, interest rate swaps, and exotic derivatives
  • Critical tracking of central bank policy distortions, quantitative easing fallout, and financial repression
  • Historical archives of financial engineering gone wrong, with a satirical yet data-driven lens

๐Ÿ›๏ธ Philosophical Roots:

Drawing inspiration from old-school contrarian investment thinkers, Basel critics, and financial archeology, INVESTMENT THE ORIGINAL maintains a non-aligned, non-corporate, and non-political stance, refusing all sponsorship from financial institutions, rating agencies, or central banks.

Its work is infused with a unique mix of rigorous data analysis and satirical commentary, making complex finance accessible โ€” and dangerous finance unignorable.


๐Ÿ“š Publications & Tools:

  • The Derivatives Disaster Index (DDI)
  • Global Blackbook of Financial Collapse
  • Ranking Series: Top 100 ESG Scams, Crypto Collapse Chronicles, Worst Financial Instruments in History
  • AI-enhanced simulations of market contagion and derivative spirals
  • Custom-designed risk radar dashboards for journalists and whistleblowers

Slogan:
๐Ÿ‘‰ โ€œOriginal Analysis for a Synthetic Age.โ€

๐Ÿ” OFFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SOURCES

๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง English

๐ŸŸข Primary Domain: BerndPulch.org
๐Ÿ”„ Mirror: GoogleFirst.org
๐Ÿ“ Archives: Rumble โ€ข WordPress

๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช Deutsch

๐ŸŸข Hauptdomain: BerndPulch.org
๐Ÿ”„ Spiegel: GoogleFirst.org
๐Ÿ“ Archive: Rumble โ€ข WordPress

๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ธ Espaรฑol

๐ŸŸข Dominio principal: BerndPulch.org
๐Ÿ”„ Espejo: GoogleFirst.org
๐Ÿ“ Archivos: Rumble โ€ข WordPress

๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ท Franรงais

๐ŸŸข Domaine principal: BerndPulch.org
๐Ÿ”„ Miroir: GoogleFirst.org
๐Ÿ“ Archives: Rumble โ€ข WordPress

๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡น Portuguรชs

๐ŸŸข Domรญnio principal: BerndPulch.org
๐Ÿ”„ Espelho: GoogleFirst.org
๐Ÿ“ Arquivos: Rumble โ€ข WordPress


๐Ÿ’ฐ ANONYMOUS MONERO (XMR) DONATIONS

Support truth preservation with 100% untraceable cryptocurrency

๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง English

41yKiG6eGbQiDxFRTKNepSiqaGaUV5VQWePHL5KYuzrxBWswyc5dtxZ43sk1SFWxDB4XrsDwVQBd3ZPNJRNdUCou3j22Coh

๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช Deutsch

41yKiG6eGbQiDxFRTKNepSiqaGaUV5VQWePHL5KYuzrxBWswyc5dtxZ43sk1SFWxDB4XrsDwVQBd3ZPNJRNdUCou3j22Coh

๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ธ Espaรฑol

41yKiG6eGbQiDxFRTKNepSiqaGaUV5VQWePHL5KYuzrxBWswyc5dtxZ43sk1SFWxDB4XrsDwVQBd3ZPNJRNdUCou3j22Coh

๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ท Franรงais

41yKiG6eGbQiDxFRTKNepSiqaGaUV5VQWePHL5KYuzrxBWswyc5dtxZ43sk1SFWxDB4XrsDwVQBd3ZPNJRNdUCou3j22Coh

๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡น Portuguรชs

41yKiG6eGbQiDxFRTKNepSiqaGaUV5VQWePHL5KYuzrxBWswyc5dtxZ43sk1SFWxDB4XrsDwVQBd3ZPNJRNdUCou3j22Coh


๐Ÿ” [DONATION RECEIVED]

Your contribution strengthens global truth preservation efforts.

๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง English

“In a time of deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.”
โ€” George Orwell

๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช Deutsch

“Wer die Wahrheit nicht weiรŸ, der ist bloรŸ ein Dummkopf. Aber wer sie weiรŸ und sie eine Lรผge nennt, der ist ein Verbrecher.”
โ€” Bertolt Brecht

๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ธ Espaรฑol

“La verdad es hija del tiempo, no de la autoridad.”
โ€” Francis Bacon

๐Ÿ‡ซ๐Ÿ‡ท Franรงais

“La vรฉritรฉ est en marche et rien ne l’arrรชtera.”
โ€” ร‰mile Zola

๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡น Portuguรชs

“A verdade nunca รฉ simples, nem รณbvia.”
โ€” Josรฉ Saramago

๐Ÿ” ACCESS EXCLUSIVE CONTENT

โšก Verified Monero address at: berndpulch.org/donations โšก

โœŒThe Shadowy Web of Bank Loans to Shadow Banks: Unraveling the Trillion-Dollar ConspiracyโœŒ

Key Points

  • Research suggests U.S. banks lent about $1.27 trillion to shadow banks by May 2025, but exact rankings are unclear due to data limits.
  • It seems likely major banks like JPMorgan Chase and Bank of America are involved, though specific amounts per bank are not public.
  • The evidence leans toward shadow banking posing risks, with growth at 22% annually in 2021, but transparency is a challenge.
  • Controversy exists over regulatory oversight, with efforts like the Fed’s FR Y-14 forms aiming for more data, yet details remain confidential.

Background

Shadow banks, or nonbank financial institutions (NBFIs), include entities like hedge funds and private equity firms that operate outside traditional banking regulations. They held about $63 trillion in assets globally in 2022, up from $28 trillion in 2009, per S&P Global estimates . This growth has raised concerns about systemic risks, especially given their role in the 2008 financial crisis.

Total Lending and Growth

Research suggests U.S. bank loans to shadow banks reached $1,273.4 billion by May 14, 2025, based on Federal Reserve H.8 data Federal Reserve H.8 Release on bank assets and liabilities. The FDIC reported a 22% annual growth rate in 2021, compared to 8% in 2017, indicating rapid expansion Financial Stability Risks of Nonbank Financial Institutions | FDIC.gov.

Major Players

It seems likely that major banks like JPMorgan Chase and Bank of America are among those lending, as sources indicate Wall Street banks are involved, though exact figures per bank are not disclosed . Shadow banks like Quicken Loans, PayPal, Rocket, and Mr. Cooper are significant recipients, with Quicken Loans being the largest U.S. mortgage lender .

Global Context

The evidence leans toward shadow banking being a global issue, with significant activity in the U.S., Europe, and China. In China, assets peaked at RMB100 trillion in 2017, declining to RMB70 trillion by 2023 due to regulation . Europeโ€™s ECB and EBA monitor these activities, while the U.S. Fed seeks more data Guidelines on limits on exposures to shadow banking | European Banking Authority.


The Shadowy Web of Bank Loans to Shadow Banks: Unraveling the Trillion-Dollar Conspiracy

Introduction

In the murky depths of the financial world, a trillion-dollar secret lurks: the massive loans from traditional banks to shadow banks. As of May 14, 2025, U.S. banks have lent $1.27 trillion to these unregulated entities, a figure that has grown alarmingly over the years. But who are the real players behind this financial chess game? And what hidden agendas are at play? This article aims to shed light on the dark corners of shadow banking, revealing the names, amounts, and countries involved in this global financial intrigue. As independent journalists, we strive to uncover these hidden truths, ensuring the public is informed about the complexities and risks of our financial system.

Key Data: The Scale of Shadow Banking

The total loans from U.S. banks to shadow banks have reached $1,273.4 billion, marking a significant increase from previous years. This figure is based on the Federal Reserve’s H.8 release, accessed on May 24, 2025, which tracks loans to nondepository financial institutions, a category that includes shadow banks Federal Reserve H.8 Release on bank assets and liabilities. The data shows a steady rise, with amounts increasing from $1,029.2 billion in April 2024 to $1,273.4 billion by May 14, 2025, as detailed in the following table:

DateAmount (Billions USD)
April 20241,029.2
October 20241,118.7
November 20241,133.6
December 20241,152.7
January 20251,166.8
February 20251,187.7
March 20251,220.5
April 20251,255.8
Week ending May 14, 20251,273.4

This growth aligns with Bloomberg’s report from February 2024, noting U.S. bank loans to shadow banks surpassed $1 trillion in January 2024, reflecting significant exposure Shadow Bank Loans From US Lenders Surpass $1 Trillion in Fed Data – Bloomberg. Additionally, the FDIC reported a 22% annual growth rate in bank lending to nonbanks in 2021, compared to 8% in 2017, indicating rapid expansion Financial Stability Risks of Nonbank Financial Institutions | FDIC.gov. Bank holdings of collateralized loan obligations (CLOs), often involving shadow banks, reached $174 billion in Q1 2023, showing significant indirect exposure Financial Stability Risks of Nonbank Financial Institutions | FDIC.gov.

Challenges in Transparency and Ranking

One of the biggest challenges in understanding shadow banking is the lack of transparency. While the total lending amount is known, detailed rankings of individual banks or shadow banks are not publicly available. This is due to the proprietary nature of banking data and regulatory restrictions, often collected through confidential reports like the Federal Reserve’s FR Y-14 forms, which are not disclosed to the public. Recent regulatory proposals, such as the Fed’s June 2024 rule change, aim to collect more granular, loan-level data for stress tests, but this information is expected to start flowing in late 2025 or early 2026 and will likely remain confidential for supervisory purposes . This opacity makes it difficult to assess the full extent of the risks involved, as shadow banks operate with less oversight, relying on short-term funding like repos and commercial paper without access to central bank support, as seen in the 2008 crisis.

Examples of Shadow Banks and Traditional Banks

Shadow banks include entities like Quicken Loans, which surpassed Wells Fargo to become the largest mortgage lender in the U.S., despite not being a traditional bank, closing nearly a half-trillion dollars of mortgage loans from 2013 through 2018 . Other examples include PayPal, Rocket, and Mr. Cooper, which provide services similar to traditional banks but operate outside the same regulatory framework, as noted in discussions on platforms like Reddit . Traditional banks such as JPMorgan Chase and Bank of America are known to lend to these shadow banks, with sources indicating Wall Street banks are asked for detailed exposure data by regulators, though specific amounts are not disclosed . The lack of transparency here is particularly concerning, as it obscures the full extent of the financial interconnections between regulated and unregulated entities.

Global Perspective: Shadow Banking Around the World

Shadow banking is not limited to the U.S. It is a global phenomenon, with significant activity in Europe, China, and other regions. In China, shadow banking assets peaked at RMB100 trillion ($15 trillion USD) in 2017, declining to around RMB70 trillion ($10 trillion USD) by 2023 due to regulatory crackdowns, with significant bank involvement through trust loans and entrusted loans, often funding the property sector . In Europe, the European Commission adopted reporting rules in September 2023 for banks’ exposure to shadow banking, and the ECB is concerned about hidden links, with money market funds holding โ‚ฌ1.7 trillion in assets by end-2023 Commission adopts reporting rules on banksโ€™ exposure to shadow banking – European Commission. Other regions like Korea face issues with fincos (financial companies) exposed to real estate, with delinquency ratios doubling to 4.4% by September 2023, though many are affiliates of major banking groups like KB Financial Group and Shinhan Bank, mitigating some stress . Globally, shadow banking held about $63 trillion in financial assets in 2022, representing 78% of global GDP, up from $28 trillion in 2009, per S&P Global .

Regulatory Efforts: A Step Toward Transparency

Regulators are increasingly concerned about the risks posed by shadow banking. In the U.S., the Federal Reserve is seeking more detailed information on banks’ lending to shadow banks through forms like FR Y-14, with proposals from June 2024 aiming for loan-level data, expected to start flowing in late 2025 or early 2026 . In Europe, the EBA issued guidelines on exposure limits to shadow banking in 2023, while the ECB monitors hidden links Guidelines on limits on exposures to shadow banking | European Banking Authority. In China, the government has already taken steps to reduce the size of the shadow banking sector through regulatory measures, reflecting a global push for greater oversight, though public data remains limited.

Persons Involved: Key Figures in the Shadow Banking World

While specific names of bank executives or shadow bank leaders are not publicly tied to individual loan amounts, several key figures have shaped the discourse around shadow banking. Paul McCulley, a former managing director of PIMCO, coined the term “shadow banking” in 2007 to describe the expanding matrix of institutions contributing to the easy-money lending environment before the 2008 financial crisis . Ben Bernanke, former Federal Reserve Chair, provided a broader definition in November 2013, describing it as “a diverse set of institutions and markets that, collectively, carry out traditional banking functionsโ€”but do so outside, or in ways only loosely linked to, the traditional system of regulated depository institutions” . Additionally, regulators like Jerome Powell, current Fed Chair, and Christine Lagarde, ECB President, play crucial roles in monitoring and regulating this sector, though their efforts are often hampered by the lack of public disclosure.

Conclusion: The Need for Vigilance

The trillion-dollar lending from banks to shadow banks represents a significant and potentially risky aspect of the global financial system. The lack of transparency and regulatory oversight in this area underscores the need for greater scrutiny and disclosure. As independent journalists, we strive to uncover these hidden truths and bring them to light, ensuring that the public is informed and aware of the complexities of our financial system. The interconnectedness of traditional banks and shadow banks poses systemic risks that could have far-reaching consequences, making it imperative for regulators, policymakers, and the public to demand greater transparency.


Call to Action (CTAs) in Multiple Languages

  • English: Become a Patron to support independent journalism and help us uncover more hidden truths.
  • Spanish: Conviรฉrtete en mecenas para apoyar el periodismo independiente y ayudarnos a descubrir mรกs verdades ocultas.
  • French: Devenez mรฉcรจne pour soutenir le journalisme indรฉpendant et nous aider ร  dรฉcouvrir plus de vรฉritรฉs cachรฉes.
  • German: Werden Sie Mรคzen, um den unabhรคngigen Journalismus zu unterstรผtzen und uns bei der Aufdeckung verborgener Wahrheiten zu helfen.
  • Italian: Diventa un mecenate per sostenere il giornalismo indipendente e aiutarci a scoprire piรน veritร  nascoste.
  • Portuguese: Torne-se um mecenas para apoiar o jornalismo independente e ajudar-nos a descobrir mais verdades ocultas.
  • Hebrew: ื”ืคื•ืš ืœืคื˜ืจื•ืŸ ื›ื“ื™ ืœืชืžื•ืš ื‘ืขื™ืชื•ื ื•ืช ืขืฆืžืื™ืช ื•ืœืขื–ื•ืจ ืœื ื• ืœื’ืœื•ืช ืขื•ื“ ืืžื™ืชื•ืช ื ืกืชืจื•ืช.
  • Russian: ะกั‚ะฐะฝัŒั‚ะต ะฟะฐั‚ั€ะพะฝะพะผ, ั‡ั‚ะพะฑั‹ ะฟะพะดะดะตั€ะถะฐั‚ัŒ ะฝะตะทะฐะฒะธัะธะผัƒัŽ ะถัƒั€ะฝะฐะปะธัั‚ะธะบัƒ ะธ ะฟะพะผะพั‡ัŒ ะฝะฐะผ ั€ะฐัะบั€ั‹ะฒะฐั‚ัŒ ะฑะพะปัŒัˆะต ัะบั€ั‹ั‚ั‹ั… ะธัั‚ะธะฝ.
  • Arabic: ุฃุตุจุญ ุฑุงุนูŠุงู‹ ู„ุฏุนู… ุงู„ุตุญุงูุฉ ุงู„ู…ุณุชู‚ู„ุฉ ูˆู…ุณุงุนุฏุชู†ุง ููŠ ูƒุดู ุงู„ู…ุฒูŠุฏ ู…ู† ุงู„ุญู‚ุงุฆู‚ ุงู„ู…ุฎููŠุฉ.
  • Japanese: ใƒ‘ใƒˆใƒญใƒณใซใชใฃใฆใ€็‹ฌ็ซ‹ใ—ใŸใ‚ธใƒฃใƒผใƒŠใƒชใ‚บใƒ ใ‚’ๆ”ฏๆดใ—ใ€็งใŸใกใŒ้š ใ•ใ‚ŒใŸ็œŸๅฎŸใ‚’ๆ˜Žใ‚‰ใ‹ใซใ™ใ‚‹ๆ‰‹ๅŠฉใ‘ใ‚’ใ—ใฆใใ ใ•ใ„ใ€‚
  • Chinese: ๆˆไธบ่ตžๅŠฉ่€…ไปฅๆ”ฏๆŒ็‹ฌ็ซ‹ๆ–ฐ้—ป๏ผŒๅนถๅธฎๅŠฉๆˆ‘ไปฌๆญ้œฒๆ›ดๅคš้š่—็š„ไบ‹ๅฎžใ€‚

WordPress Tags

shadow banking, bank loans, financial transparency, independent journalism, global finance, regulatory oversight, economic risks, financial system, hidden truths, investigative reporting

Key Citations

Here are the translations of the article into the requested languages, maintaining the structure, key data, and citations while adapting terminology appropriately:


Spanish (Espaรฑol)

La Red Oscura de Prรฉstamos Bancarios a la Banca en la Sombra: Desentraรฑando la Conspiraciรณn Billonaria
Introducciรณn
En las profundidades del mundo financiero, se esconde un secreto billonario: los prรฉstamos masivos de bancos tradicionales a la banca en la sombra. Para el 14 de mayo de 2025, los bancos estadounidenses han prestado $1.27 billones a estas entidades no reguladas, una cifra que ha crecido alarmantemente. ยฟQuiรฉnes son los actores detrรกs de este juego financiero? Este artรญculo revela los riesgos y la falta de transparencia en un sistema que amenaza la estabilidad global.

Datos Clave
Los prรฉstamos de bancos estadounidenses a la banca en la sombra alcanzaron $1,273.4 mil millones en mayo de 2025, segรบn datos de la Reserva Federal.

Tabla de Crecimiento (en miles de millones USD):

FechaMonto
Abril 20241,029.2
Mayo 20251,273.4

Contexto Global
China redujo su sector bancario en la sombra de RMB100 billones (2017) a RMB70 billones (2023). En Europa, el BCE supervisa โ‚ฌ1.7 billones en fondos del mercado monetario.

Llamado a la Acciรณn (CTAs):

  • Espaรฑol: Conviรฉrtete en mecenas para apoyar el periodismo independiente.

French (Franรงais)

Le Rรฉseau Obscur des Prรชts Bancaires aux Banques de lโ€™Ombre : Dรฉmรชler la Conspiration de Mille Milliards de Dollars
Introduction
Dans les profondeurs troubles de la finance mondiale, un secret de mille milliards de dollars se cache : les prรชts massifs des banques traditionnelles aux banques de lโ€™ombre. En mai 2025, les banques amรฉricaines ont prรชtรฉ 1 270 milliards de dollars ร  ces entitรฉs non rรฉgulรฉes. Qui sont les acteurs de ce jeu dโ€™รฉchecs financier ?

Donnรฉes Clรฉs
Les prรชts aux banques de lโ€™ombre ont atteint 1 273,4 milliards de dollars en mai 2025 (Fed).

Tableau de Croissance (en milliards USD):

DateMontant
Avril 20241 029,2
Mai 20251 273,4

Contexte Mondial
En Chine, les actifs de la banque de lโ€™ombre sont passรฉs de 100 000 milliards de yuans (2017) ร  70 000 milliards (2023).

Appel ร  lโ€™Action (CTAs):

  • Franรงais: Devenez mรฉcรจne pour soutenir le journalisme indรฉpendant.

German (Deutsch)

Das Dunkle Netz der Bankkredite an Schattenbanken: Die Aufdeckung einer Billionen-Dollar-Verschwรถrung
Einfรผhrung
US-Banken haben bis Mai 2025 1,27 Billionen Dollar an Schattenbanken verliehen. Wer steckt dahinter? Dieser Artikel enthรผllt die globalen Risiken und die mangelnde Transparenz.

Schlรผsseldaten
Die Kredite stiegen von 1.029,2 Mrd. USD (April 2024) auf 1.273,4 Mrd. USD (Mai 2025).

Wachstumstabelle (in Mrd. USD):

DatumBetrag
April 20241.029,2
Mai 20251.273,4

Globale Perspektive
In China sanken Schattenbanken-Assets von 100 Bio. RMB (2017) auf 70 Bio. RMB (2023).

Handlungsaufforderung (CTAs):

  • Deutsch: Werden Sie Mรคzen, um unabhรคngigen Journalismus zu unterstรผtzen.

Italian (Italiano)

La Rete Oscura dei Prestiti Bancari alle Banche Ombra: Svelare il Complotto da Mille Miliardi di Dollari
Introduzione
Le banche statunitensi hanno prestato 1.270 miliardi di dollari alle banche ombra entro maggio 2025. Questo articolo esplora i rischi sistemici e lโ€™opacitร  del settore.

Dati Chiave
I prestiti sono cresciuti da 1.029,2 miliardi (aprile 2024) a 1.273,4 miliardi (maggio 2025).

Tabella di Crescita (in miliardi USD):

DataImporto
Aprile 20241.029,2
Maggio 20251.273,4

Contesto Globale
In Cina, le attivitร  delle banche ombra sono scese da 100.000 miliardi di RMB (2017) a 70.000 miliardi (2023).

Call to Action (CTAs):

  • Italiano: Diventa un mecenate per sostenere il giornalismo indipendente.

Portuguese (Portuguรชs)

A Teia Sombria de Emprรฉstimos Bancรกrios aos Bancos Sombra: Revelando a Conspiraรงรฃo Trilionรกria
Introduรงรฃo
Atรฉ maio de 2025, bancos dos EUA emprestaram US$ 1,27 trilhรฃo a bancos sombra. Este artigo expรตe os riscos globais e a falta de regulamentaรงรฃo.

Dados Chave
Os emprรฉstimos cresceram de US$ 1.029,2 bi (abril 2024) para US$ 1.273,4 bi (maio 2025).

Tabela de Crescimento (em bilhรตes USD):

DataValor
Abril 20241.029,2
Maio 20251.273,4

Contexto Global
Na China, ativos de bancos sombra caรญram de RMB 100 tri (2017) para RMB 70 tri (2023).

Chamada para Aรงรฃo (CTAs):

  • Portuguรชs: Torne-se um mecenas para apoiar o jornalismo independente.

Hebrew (ืขื‘ืจื™ืช)

ืจืฉืช ื”ื”ืœื•ื•ืื•ืช ื”ืืคืœื•ืช ืฉืœ ื”ื‘ื ืงื™ื ืœื‘ื ืงื™ื ื‘ืฆืœ: ื—ืฉื™ืคืช ื”ืงื•ื ืกืคื™ืจืฆื™ื” ื”ื˜ืจื™ืœื™ื•ื ื™ืช
ืžื‘ื•ื
ื‘ื ืงื™ื ืืžืจื™ืงืื™ื ื”ืœื•ื• 1.27 ื˜ืจื™ืœื™ื•ืŸ ื“ื•ืœืจ ืœื‘ื ืงื™ื ื‘ืฆืœ ืขื“ ืžืื™ 2025. ื”ืžืืžืจ ื—ื•ืฉืฃ ืืช ื”ืกื™ื›ื•ื ื™ื ื”ืขื•ืœืžื™ื™ื ื•ื—ื•ืกืจ ื”ืฉืงื™ืคื•ืช.

ื ืชื•ื ื™ื ืžืจื›ื–ื™ื™ื
ื”ื”ืœื•ื•ืื•ืช ื’ื“ืœื• ืž-1,029.2 ืžื™ืœื™ืืจื“ ื“ื•ืœืจ (ืืคืจื™ืœ 2024) ืœ-1,273.4 ืžื™ืœื™ืืจื“ (ืžืื™ 2025).

ื˜ื‘ืœืช ืฆืžื™ื—ื” (ื‘ืžื™ืœื™ืืจื“ื™ ื“ื•ืœืจ):

ืชืืจื™ืšืกื›ื•ื
ืืคืจื™ืœ 20241,029.2
ืžืื™ 20251,273.4

ื”ืงืฉืจ ื’ืœื•ื‘ืœื™
ื‘ืกื™ืŸ, ื ื›ืกื™ ื‘ื ืงืื•ืช ื”ืฆืœ ื™ืจื“ื• ืž-100 ื˜ืจื™ืœื™ื•ืŸ ืจื ืžื™ื ื‘ื™ (2017) ืœ-70 ื˜ืจื™ืœื™ื•ืŸ (2023).

ืงืจื™ืื” ืœืคืขื•ืœื” (CTAs):

  • ืขื‘ืจื™ืช: ื”ืคื•ืš ืœืคื˜ืจื•ืŸ ื›ื“ื™ ืœืชืžื•ืš ื‘ืขื™ืชื•ื ื•ืช ืขืฆืžืื™ืช.

Russian (ะ ัƒััะบะธะน)

ะขะตะฝะตะฒะฐั ะŸะฐัƒั‚ะธะฝะฐ ะ‘ะฐะฝะบะพะฒัะบะธั… ะšั€ะตะดะธั‚ะพะฒ ะขะตะฝะตะฒั‹ะผ ะ‘ะฐะฝะบะฐะผ: ะ ะฐะทะพะฑะปะฐั‡ะตะฝะธะต ะขั€ะธะปะปะธะพะฝะฝะพะณะพ ะ—ะฐะณะพะฒะพั€ะฐ
ะ’ะฒะตะดะตะฝะธะต
ะš ะผะฐัŽ 2025 ะณะพะดะฐ ะฐะผะตั€ะธะบะฐะฝัะบะธะต ะฑะฐะฝะบะธ ะฟั€ะตะดะพัั‚ะฐะฒะธะปะธ ั‚ะตะฝะตะฒะพะผัƒ ัะตะบั‚ะพั€ัƒ ะบั€ะตะดะธั‚ั‹ ะฝะฐ $1.27 ั‚ั€ะปะฝ. ะ’ ัั‚ะฐั‚ัŒะต ั€ะฐัะบั€ั‹ะฒะฐัŽั‚ัั ะณะปะพะฑะฐะปัŒะฝั‹ะต ั€ะธัะบะธ ะธ ะพั‚ััƒั‚ัั‚ะฒะธะต ะฟั€ะพะทั€ะฐั‡ะฝะพัั‚ะธ.

ะšะปัŽั‡ะตะฒั‹ะต ะดะฐะฝะฝั‹ะต
ะšั€ะตะดะธั‚ั‹ ะฒั‹ั€ะพัะปะธ ั $1,029.2 ะผะปั€ะด (ะฐะฟั€ะตะปัŒ 2024) ะดะพ $1,273.4 ะผะปั€ะด (ะผะฐะน 2025).

ะขะฐะฑะปะธั†ะฐ ั€ะพัั‚ะฐ (ะฒ ะผะปั€ะด ะดะพะปะปะฐั€ะพะฒ):

ะ”ะฐั‚ะฐะกัƒะผะผะฐ
ะะฟั€ะตะปัŒ 20241,029.2
ะœะฐะน 20251,273.4

ะ“ะปะพะฑะฐะปัŒะฝั‹ะน ะบะพะฝั‚ะตะบัั‚
ะ’ ะšะธั‚ะฐะต ะฐะบั‚ะธะฒั‹ ั‚ะตะฝะตะฒะพะณะพ ะฑะฐะฝะบะธะฝะณะฐ ัะฝะธะทะธะปะธััŒ ัะพ 100 ั‚ั€ะปะฝ ัŽะฐะฝะตะน (2017) ะดะพ 70 ั‚ั€ะปะฝ (2023).

ะŸั€ะธะทั‹ะฒ ะบ ะดะตะนัั‚ะฒะธัŽ (CTAs):

  • ะ ัƒััะบะธะน: ะกั‚ะฐะฝัŒั‚ะต ะฟะฐั‚ั€ะพะฝะพะผ, ั‡ั‚ะพะฑั‹ ะฟะพะดะดะตั€ะถะฐั‚ัŒ ะฝะตะทะฐะฒะธัะธะผัƒัŽ ะถัƒั€ะฝะฐะปะธัั‚ะธะบัƒ.

Arabic (ุงู„ุนุฑุจูŠุฉ)

ุดุจูƒุฉ ุงู„ู‚ุฑูˆุถ ุงู„ู…ุตุฑููŠุฉ ุงู„ู…ุธู„ู…ุฉ ู„ู„ุจู†ูˆูƒ ุงู„ุธู„: ูƒุดู ู…ุคุงู…ุฑุฉ ุงู„ุชุฑูŠู„ูŠูˆู† ุฏูˆู„ุงุฑ
ู…ู‚ุฏู…ุฉ
ู‚ุฏู…ุช ุงู„ุจู†ูˆูƒ ุงู„ุฃู…ุฑูŠูƒูŠุฉ 1.27 ุชุฑูŠู„ูŠูˆู† ุฏูˆู„ุงุฑ ูƒู‚ุฑูˆุถ ู„ู„ุจู†ูˆูƒ ุงู„ุธู„ ุจุญู„ูˆู„ ู…ุงูŠูˆ 2025. ุชูƒุดู ุงู„ู…ู‚ุงู„ุฉ ุนู† ุงู„ู…ุฎุงุทุฑ ุงู„ุนุงู„ู…ูŠุฉ ูˆู†ู‚ุต ุงู„ุดูุงููŠุฉ.

ุจูŠุงู†ุงุช ุฑุฆูŠุณูŠุฉ
ุงุฑุชูุนุช ุงู„ู‚ุฑูˆุถ ู…ู† 1,029.2 ู…ู„ูŠุงุฑ ุฏูˆู„ุงุฑ (ุฃุจุฑูŠู„ 2024) ุฅู„ู‰ 1,273.4 ู…ู„ูŠุงุฑ (ู…ุงูŠูˆ 2025).

ุฌุฏูˆู„ ุงู„ู†ู…ูˆ (ุจู…ู„ูŠุงุฑุงุช ุงู„ุฏูˆู„ุงุฑุงุช):

ุงู„ุชุงุฑูŠุฎุงู„ู…ุจู„ุบ
ุฃุจุฑูŠู„ 20241,029.2
ู…ุงูŠูˆ 20251,273.4

ุงู„ุณูŠุงู‚ ุงู„ุนุงู„ู…ูŠ
ููŠ ุงู„ุตูŠู†ุŒ ุงู†ุฎูุถุช ุฃุตูˆู„ ุงู„ุจู†ูˆูƒ ุงู„ุธู„ ู…ู† 100 ุชุฑูŠู„ูŠูˆู† ูŠูˆุงู† (2017) ุฅู„ู‰ 70 ุชุฑูŠู„ูŠูˆู† (2023).

ุฏุนูˆุฉ ู„ู„ุนู…ู„ (CTAs):

  • ุงู„ุนุฑุจูŠุฉ: ุฃุตุจุญ ุฑุงุนูŠุงู‹ ู„ุฏุนู… ุงู„ุตุญุงูุฉ ุงู„ู…ุณุชู‚ู„ุฉ.

Japanese (ๆ—ฅๆœฌ่ชž)

ใ‚ทใƒฃใƒ‰ใ‚ฆใƒใƒณใ‚ฏใธใฎ้Š€่กŒ่ž่ณ‡ใฎ้—‡๏ผš1ๅ…†ใƒ‰ใƒซใฎ้™ฐ่ฌ€ใ‚’่งฃๆ˜Žใ™ใ‚‹
ใฏใ˜ใ‚ใซ
2025ๅนด5ๆœˆใพใงใซ็ฑณๅ›ฝ้Š€่กŒใฏใ‚ทใƒฃใƒ‰ใ‚ฆใƒใƒณใ‚ฏใซ1.27ๅ…†ใƒ‰ใƒซใ‚’่ž่ณ‡ใ€‚ๆœฌ่จ˜ไบ‹ใฏไธ–็•Œ็š„ใชใƒชใ‚นใ‚ฏใจไธ้€ๆ˜Žๆ€งใ‚’ๆšดใใ€‚

ไธป่ฆใƒ‡ใƒผใ‚ฟ
่ž่ณ‡้กใฏ2024ๅนด4ๆœˆใฎ1,029.2ๅ„„ใƒ‰ใƒซใ‹ใ‚‰2025ๅนด5ๆœˆใซใฏ1,273.4ๅ„„ใƒ‰ใƒซใซๅข—ๅŠ ใ€‚

ๆˆ้•ท่กจ๏ผˆ10ๅ„„ใƒ‰ใƒซๅ˜ไฝ๏ผ‰:

ๆ—ฅไป˜้‡‘้ก
2024ๅนด4ๆœˆ1,029.2
2025ๅนด5ๆœˆ1,273.4

ใ‚ฐใƒญใƒผใƒใƒซใช็Šถๆณ
ไธญๅ›ฝใฎใ‚ทใƒฃใƒ‰ใ‚ฆใƒใƒณใ‚ฏ่ณ‡็”ฃใฏ2017ๅนดใฎ100ๅ…†ๅ…ƒใ‹ใ‚‰2023ๅนดใซใฏ70ๅ…†ๅ…ƒใซๆธ›ๅฐ‘ใ€‚

ใ‚ขใ‚ฏใ‚ทใƒงใƒณใธใฎๅ‘ผใณใ‹ใ‘ (CTAs):

  • ๆ—ฅๆœฌ่ชž: ใƒ‘ใƒˆใƒญใƒณใซใชใฃใฆ็‹ฌ็ซ‹ใ‚ธใƒฃใƒผใƒŠใƒชใ‚บใƒ ใ‚’ๆ”ฏๆดใ€‚

Chinese (ไธญๆ–‡)

้“ถ่กŒๅฏนๅฝฑๅญ้“ถ่กŒ็š„ไธ‡ไบฟ่ดทๆฌพ๏ผšๆญๅผ€ๅ…จ็ƒ้˜ด่ฐ‹
ๅผ•่จ€
ๆˆช่‡ณ2025ๅนด5ๆœˆ๏ผŒ็พŽๅ›ฝ้“ถ่กŒๅ‘ๅฝฑๅญ้“ถ่กŒๆไพ›ไบ†1.27ไธ‡ไบฟ็พŽๅ…ƒ่ดทๆฌพใ€‚ๆœฌๆ–‡ๆญ้œฒๅ…ถๅ…จ็ƒ้ฃŽ้™ฉไธŽไธ้€ๆ˜Žๆ€งใ€‚

ๅ…ณ้”ฎๆ•ฐๆฎ
่ดทๆฌพ้ขไปŽ2024ๅนด4ๆœˆ็š„1.0292ไธ‡ไบฟ็พŽๅ…ƒๅขž่‡ณ2025ๅนด5ๆœˆ็š„1.2734ไธ‡ไบฟ็พŽๅ…ƒใ€‚

ๅขž้•ฟ่กจ๏ผˆๅไบฟ็พŽๅ…ƒ๏ผ‰:

ๆ—ฅๆœŸ้‡‘้ข
2024ๅนด4ๆœˆ1,029.2
2025ๅนด5ๆœˆ1,273.4

ๅ…จ็ƒ่ƒŒๆ™ฏ
ไธญๅ›ฝๅฝฑๅญ้“ถ่กŒ่ต„ไบงไปŽ2017ๅนด็š„100ไธ‡ไบฟๅ…ƒ้™่‡ณ2023ๅนด็š„70ไธ‡ไบฟๅ…ƒใ€‚

่กŒๅŠจๅ‘ผๅ (CTAs):

  • ไธญๆ–‡: ๆˆไธบ่ตžๅŠฉ่€…ไปฅๆ”ฏๆŒ็‹ฌ็ซ‹ๆ–ฐ้—ปใ€‚

WordPress Tags (Translated):

  • Spanish: banca en la sombra, prรฉstamos bancarios
  • French: banque de lโ€™ombre, prรชts bancaires
  • German: Schattenbanken, Bankkredite
  • Japanese: ใ‚ทใƒฃใƒ‰ใ‚ฆใƒใƒณใ‚ญใƒณใ‚ฐ, ้Š€่กŒ่ž่ณ‡

๐Ÿ”’ OFFICIAL SOURCES
Primary Domain: berndpulch.org
Mirror: googlefirst.org
Archives: Rumble Video โ€ข WordPress

๐ŸŒŸ EXCLUSIVE ACCESS
Support via donations to unlock classified briefings. Full disclosure available to patrons.
Donation Portal

๐Ÿ“œ CREDENTIALS

๐Ÿ’ณ CRYPTO SUPPORT
BTC/ETH/BNB:
0xdaa3b887...d616bb
Multi-Chain (BSC/ETH/Polygon):
212ร—0x271588b5...7AC7f
XMR: 41yKiG6...Coh
Full addresses via Donations Page


May truth prevail under divine protection.