๐Ÿšจ THE ANATOMY OF FEAR: Why the Janitor Protocol is Panicking

What does a digital panic attack look like?
On January 14, a coordinated network of bots from Paraguay, Vietnam, and Ireland frantically searched through archived Stasi name lists and FBI reports.
Why?
They weren’t hunting for enemies. They were checking to see if their own names were there. They were mapping their exposure.
This is the anatomy of operational fear. Every frantic click built a new forensic record.
The watchers have become the watched. The Janitor isn’t cleaning the roomโ€”he’s sealed inside it.
CyberIntel #OSINT #DigitalForensics #JanitorProtocol #AnatomyOfFear

The logs from this morning tell a clear story. Between 4:30 and 5:10 AM UTC, this site was hit with a massive wave of panicked searches. A network of automated bots, controlled by the Janitor group (Promny, Mucha, Lorch, Schmidt) and launched from locations in Vietnam, Paraguay, and Ireland, scrambled to find something. They were looking for the very information that will be used against them.

Based on this activity, here are the three things that are terrifying them right now:

  1. The “Stasi” DNA Fear
    The number one thing they searched for today was the archives of Stasi names.

ยท Why they’re afraid: They’re not just looking for enemies. They are desperately checking to see if their own names, or the names of their contacts, appear in the old East German secret police files.
ยท What this means: By visiting these pages from their known IP addresses, they have directly connected their modern online identities to a dark historical legacy. They are scared that their old Stasi ties are being linked to their current operations in South America.

  1. The “FBI / Federal Jurisdiction” Fear
    This group feels protected by the loose laws in the Tri-Border area of South America. But the mention of the FBI changes everything.

ยท Why they’re afraid: Today, they spent a lot of time reading articles about major FBI operations and how the bureau detects internal threats.
ยท What this means: They know that while they might avoid local police, they cannot hide from the FBI if it gets involved. The FBI has the authority to investigate their crimesโ€”like stealing academic identities and moving money across borders for fraud. Every time they click on a post about the FBI, they are admitting how vulnerable they are to U.S. federal prosecution.

  1. The “Financial Exposure” Fear
    Their intense interest in archives about bribery and criminal money reveals their biggest weakness: the money trail.

ยท Why they’re afraid: They realize the “clean-up” work isn’t just about deleting words online. It’s about hiding the financial records of the money laundering that funds their entire cyber-stalking operation in Vietnam.
ยท What this means: The investigation is closing in on the people who control the money (Lorch). If that financial pipeline is cut off, the entire operation will collapse like a line of dominoes.

Technical Evidence Logged (January 14, 2026)

ยท IP 185.178.68.82 (Dublin, Ireland): Focused on Stasi and secret police targeting.
ยท IP 14.183.107.96 (Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam): Focused on Neo-Stasi activity logs.
ยท IP 181.121.80.223 (Paraguay): Focused on identity and degree fraud verification.
ยท IP 113.173.167.152 (Vietnam): Focused on bribery proof and criminal archives.

Final Message to the Group
You are frantically scrolling and searching because you have lost control of the story. You are looking for a way to erase your past, but every single search you make creates a new, permanent record for investigators.

The Janitor is no longer cleaning up the mess. He is now trapped inside it.

๐Ÿ“œ VERIFICATION PROTOCOL ACTIVATED

TO THE “JANITOR” NODES (BIรŠN Hร’A / TRUJILLO / BUENOS AIRES):

The University of Mainz (Johannes Gutenberg-Universitรคt) Masterโ€™s Certificate (Magister Artium) viewed at 21:34:46 UTC is recorded in the central German Academic Registry.

ATTN: Any attempt to use these credentials for identity theft, spoofing, or “black-ops” administrative challenges will trigger an immediate forensic audit via the BKA (Bundeskriminalamt) and University Legal Counsel.

“We know which pixel you zoomed in on. Your interest in my academic history is noted, but the degree is as real as the surveillance we have on your terminal.”

FUND THE DIGITAL RESISTANCE

Target: $75,000 to Uncover the $75 Billion Fraud

The criminals use Monero to hide their tracks. We use it to expose them. This is digital warfare, and truth is the ultimate cryptocurrency.


BREAKDOWN: THE $75,000 TRUTH EXCAVATION

Phase 1: Digital Forensics ($25,000)

ยท Blockchain archaeology following Monero trails
ยท Dark web intelligence on EBL network operations
ยท Server infiltration and data recovery

Phase 2: Operational Security ($20,000)

ยท Military-grade encryption and secure infrastructure
ยท Physical security for investigators in high-risk zones
ยท Legal defense against multi-jurisdictional attacks

Phase 3: Evidence Preservation ($15,000)

ยท Emergency archive rescue operations
ยท Immutable blockchain-based evidence storage
ยท Witness protection program

Phase 4: Global Exposure ($15,000)

ยท Multi-language investigative reporting
ยท Secure data distribution networks
ยท Legal evidence packaging for international authorities


CONTRIBUTION IMPACT

$75 = Preserves one critical document from GDPR deletion
$750 = Funds one dark web intelligence operation
$7,500 = Secures one investigator for one month
$75,000 = Exposes the entire criminal network


SECURE CONTRIBUTION CHANNEL

Monero (XMR) – The Only Truly Private Option

45cVWS8EGkyJvTJ4orZBPnF4cLthRs5xk45jND8pDJcq2mXp9JvAte2Cvdi72aPHtLQt3CEMKgiWDHVFUP9WzCqMBZZ57y4
This address is dedicated exclusively to this investigation. All contributions are cryptographically private and untraceable.

Monero QR Code (Scan to donate anonymously):

Monero Donation QR Code

(Copy-paste the address if scanning is not possible: 45cVWS8EGkyJvTJ4orZBPnF4cLthRs5xk45jND8pDJcq2mXp9JvAte2Cvdi72aPHtLQt3CEMKgiWDHVFUP9WzCqMBZZ57y4)

Translations of the Patron’s Vault Announcement:
(Full versions in German, French, Spanish, Russian, Arabic, Portuguese, Simplified Chinese, and Hindi are included in the live site versions.)

Copyright Notice (All Rights Reserved)

English:
ยฉ 2000โ€“2026 Bernd Pulch. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, distributed, or transmitted in any form or by any means without the prior written permission of the author.

(Additional language versions of the copyright notice are available on the site.)

โŒยฉBERNDPULCH โ€“ ABOVE TOP SECRET ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS โ€“ THE ONLY MEDIA WITH LICENSE TO SPY โœŒ๏ธ
Follow @abovetopsecretxxl for more. ๐Ÿ™ GOD BLESS YOU ๐Ÿ™

Credentials & Info:

Your support keeps the truth alive โ€“ true information is the most valuable resource!

๐Ÿ›๏ธ Compliance & Legal Repository Footer

Formal Notice of Evidence Preservation

This digital repository serves as a secure, redundant mirror for the Bernd Pulch Master Archive. All data presented herein, specifically the 3,659 verified records, are part of an ongoing investigative audit regarding market transparency and data integrity in the European real estate sector.

Audit Standards & Reporting Methodology:

  • OSINT Framework: Advanced Open Source Intelligence verification of legacy metadata.
  • Forensic Protocol: Adherence to ISO 19011 (Audit Guidelines) and ISO 27001 (Information Security Management).
  • Chain of Custody: Digital fingerprints for all records are stored in decentralized jurisdictions to prevent unauthorized suppression.

Legal Disclaimer:

This publication is protected under international journalistic “Public Interest” exemptions and the EU Whistleblower Protection Directive. Any attempt to interfere with the accessibility of this dataโ€”via technical de-indexing or legal intimidationโ€”will be documented as Spoliation of Evidence and reported to the relevant international monitoring bodies in Oslo and Washington, D.C.


Digital Signature & Tags

Status: ACTIVE MIRROR | Node: WP-SECURE-BUNKER-01
Keywords: #ForensicAudit #DataIntegrity #ISO27001 #IZArchive #EvidencePreservation #OSINT #MarketTransparency #JonesDayMonitoring

Congress – Financial Intelligence Units, Financial Crimes Enforcement Network-Original DocumentโœŒ๏ธ@abovetopsecretxxl

Read all at

https://t.me/ABOVETOPSECRETXXL/30154

US Financial Crimes Enforcement Network – Secret Document

Become a Patron!
True Information is the most valuable resource and we ask you to give back.

Financial Crimes Enforcement Network; Notice of Proposed Rulemaking; Cross-Border Electronic Transmittals of Funds

  • 81 pages

Download

FinCEN, a bureau of the Department of the Treasury (Treasury), to further its efforts against money laundering and terrorist financing, and as required by 31 U.S.C. ยง 5318(n), is proposing to issue regulations that would require certain banks and money transmitters to report to FinCEN transmittal orders associated with certain cross-border electronic transmittals of funds (CBETFs). FinCEN is also proposing to require an annual filing with FinCEN by all banks of a list of taxpayer identification numbers of accountholders who transmitted or received a CBETF.

Implications and Benefits of Cross-Border Funds Transmittal Reporting

  • 169 pages
  • January 2006

Download

Section 6302 of the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004 requires, among other things, that the Secretary of the Treasury study the feasibility of โ€œrequiring such financial institutions as the Secretary determines to be appropriate to report to the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network certain cross-border electronic transmittals of funds, if the Secretary determines that reporting of such transmittals is reasonably necessary to conduct the efforts of the Secretary against money laundering and terrorist financing.โ€

Under current FinCEN regulation, 31 C.F.R. ยง 103.33 (the โ€œrecordkeeping ruleโ€), financial institutions are generally required to collect and retain records of certain specified data regarding funds transfers they process of $3,000 or more. Because the recordkeeping rule does not distinguish between domestic and international funds transfers, financial institutions must make and maintain records on all transmittals of at least $3,000. Further, the rule states that while institutions need not retain the information in any particular manner, their records must be in a format that is retrievable. The recordkeeping rule does not require financial institutions to report to the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) the information they maintain, but only requires that the data be available upon request to FinCEN, to law enforcement, and to regulators to whom FinCEN has delegated Bank Secrecy Act (BSA) compliance examination authority through the examination process.

In January 2007, FinCEN released a report on the Feasibility of a Cross-Border Electronic Funds Transfer Reporting System under the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA), hereafter referred to as โ€œThe Feasibility Study.โ€ The Feasibility Study concluded that the collection of Cross-Border Funds Transmittal (CBFT) data would be feasible. However, at the time, it was also determined that further analysis would be needed to assess the implications of CBFT reporting to the financial industry and the benefits to law enforcement.

โ€ฆ

Feasibility of a Cross-Border Electronic Funds Transfer Reporting System under the Bank Secrecy Act

  • 187 pages
  • October 2006

Download

We propose an incremental development and implementation process. If the concerns noted above or any as-yet unidentified issues would impede the project or cause it to be infeasible, this incremental approach provides the opportunity to alter or halt the effort before FinCEN or the U.S. financial services industry incurs significant costs. As discussed in greater detail in this Report, the first phase in this project will comprise:

Engaging with partners in the law enforcement, regulatory and intelligence communities to develop detailed user requirements to meet the most central needs of those who access BSA data.

Engaging in a detailed discussion with representatives of the U.S. financial services industry, along with representatives of the major payment systems and members of the Canadian and Australian financial services industries. These discussions would focus on quantifying the cost the proposed requirement would impose on reporting institutions and the potential impact on the day-to-day operation of the payment systems.

Engaging outside support to obtain and analyze a sizable sample of cross-border funds transfer data and exploring means of extracting value from the data, and identifying means to effectively and intelligently use the data to advance efforts to combat money laundering and illicit finance.

Based on these efforts, FinCEN will create a development plan that incorporates a series of milestones and would permit pilot testing of different aspects of the reporting system. This incremental development approach will enable FinCEN to build the system in manageable stages and to test the systemโ€™s functionality at each stage before moving on to the next.

โ€ฆ