THE BANKERS WHO BOUGHT EPSTEIN’S SILENCE Named. Shamed. Still Employed. Jes Staley. Paul Morris. Rosemary Vrablic. Michael O’Neill. Mary Erdoes. Leon Black. Glenn Dubin. They processed $1.5 billion in suspicious transactions. They overruled compliance officers who flagged the crimes. They bought criminal immunity with your pension money. Not one has faced arrest. Full executive names, internal emails, and unredacted documents: Patreon.com/berndpulch
THE EPSTEIN FINANCIAL ARCHIPELAGO: Mapping Wall Street’s Complicity in a Criminal Enterprise
How America’s most powerful banks and hedge funds enabled Jeffrey Epstein’s transnational sex trafficking operationโand why the money trail leads to questions that remain unanswered
๐ DEEP DIVE ACCESS: For exclusive documents, extended financial analysis, and insider intelligence on the Epstein network not available in this public report, subscribe to Patreon.com/berndpulch or join the Patron’s Vault waiting list at office@berndpulch.org.
INTRODUCTION: The $1.5 Billion Question
In September 2025, during a House Judiciary Committee hearing, FBI Director Kash Patel made a startling admission: federal investigators had identified $1.5 billion in suspicious financial transactions tied to Jeffrey Epstein’s sex trafficking network, reported by JPMorgan Chase, Deutsche Bank, Bank of America, and Bank of New York Mellon. Yet despite this mountain of financial evidence, the FBI has failed to “follow the money” in any meaningful way.
This revelation came as Congress passed the Epstein Files Transparency Act in November 2025, mandating the release of 6 million pages of documents. To date, 3.5 million pages have been releasedโincluding financial ledgers, flight manifests, and internal bank communications that paint a damning picture of institutional complicity.
The story that emerges is not merely one of a single predator operating in isolation, but of an entire financial ecosystem that enabled, protected, and profited from criminality on an industrial scale.
THE WALL STREET FIRMS: A ROGUE’S GALLERY
The financial institutions that serviced Epstein’s empire represent a cross-section of American and international banking power. Each played a distinct role in maintaining the infrastructure of Epstein’s operations:
1. JPMORGAN CHASE & CO.
The Primary Enabler (1998โ2013)
Epstein’s relationship with America’s largest bank began in 1998 and continued for 15 years, spanning his 2008 conviction for soliciting prostitution from a minor. Internal documents reveal that JPMorgan executives were aware of Epstein’s criminality years before federal prosecutors intervened.
Key revelations from the 2023 Senate Finance Committee investigation:
$4.3 million in transactions flagged as suspicious while Epstein was alive and actively trafficking victims
$1.3 billion in retroactive suspicious activity reports filed after Epstein’s 2019 deathโnearly 300 times the amount reported during his lifetime
1,200 emails between Epstein and JPMorgan executive Jes Staley, including references to Disney princess code names for women and photos of young women in “seductive poses”
Staley, who later became CEO of Barclays, has admitted under oath to having sexual relations with Epstein’s staff members. He described his relationship with Epstein as “profound” and referred to him as “family” in internal communications. Staley allegedly “observed victims personally,” including visiting young girls at Epstein’s apartments, yet continued to champion the lucrative account internally.
Settlement: $290 million to victims (2023), $75 million to U.S. Virgin Islands (2023)
2. DEUTSCHE BANK
The Post-Conviction Lifeline (2013โ2018)
After JPMorgan finally severed ties in 2013โonly after internal compliance officers raised alarms that were ignored for yearsโDeutsche Bank eagerly stepped in to service Epstein’s accounts. This occurred after Epstein’s 2008 conviction and registration as a sex offender, at a time when any legitimate financial institution should have recognized the existential risk.
Deutsche Bank maintained the relationship until 2018, processing transactions that included:
Payments to Ghislaine Maxwell totaling $30.7 million, including over $7 million for a helicopter used to transport victims to Epstein’s private island
Wire transfers to models and “assistants” who were later identified as victims
Large cash withdrawals that bank compliance officers flagged but executives approved
Settlement: $75 million to victims (2023), following a $150 million regulatory fine by New York State (2020)
The bank’s official statement: “We acknowledge our error of onboarding Epstein in 2013 and the weaknesses in our processes.”
3. BANK OF AMERICA
The Leon Black Connection
Recent investigations have revealed Bank of America’s central role in processing $170 million in payments from billionaire Leon Black to Epstein between 2012 and 2017โpayments now acknowledged to have partially funded Epstein’s sex trafficking operations in the U.S. Virgin Islands.
According to a March 2025 Senate Finance Committee letter:
Bank of America filed only two suspicious activity reports covering these transactions, filed years after the fact
The bank processed the $170 million “without asking for information as to the nature of the transactions”
The SARs were filed seven years after the transactions began and eight months after Epstein’s 2019 arrest on federal sex trafficking charges
Black, co-founder of Apollo Global Management, paid Epstein at an annualized rate of $23โ26 million for purported “tax and estate planning advice”โcompensation exceeding the median CEO pay for Fortune 500 companies, for services provided by a college dropout with no accounting or legal credentials.
In January 2023, Black paid $62.5 million to settle claims from the U.S. Virgin Islands, with the settlement explicitly stating: “Jeffrey Epstein used the money Black paid him to partially fund his operations in the Virgin Islands.” The settlement granted Black criminal immunity for himself, his attorneys, and his agents.
4. BEAR STEARNS (Defunct)
The Origin Story (1976โ1981)
Epstein’s Wall Street career began at Bear Stearns in 1976, where he rose from junior assistant to limited partner before his 1981 departure. The connections formed here would prove enduring:
Epstein later chaired Liquid Funding Ltd., a Bermuda-registered entity partially owned by Bear Stearns from 2000โ2007, loaded with mortgage-backed securities and collateralized loan obligations
The Paradise Papers reveal Epstein utilized Appleby, the offshore services provider, to navigate “the secretive and low-tax world of offshore finance”
Bear Stearns’ 2008 collapseโtriggered by exposure to the same toxic assets Epstein’s vehicle tradedโeliminated a potential source of institutional memory regarding his early financial activities
5. ADDITIONAL FINANCIAL ENTITIES
Highbridge Capital Management
Glenn Dubin’s hedge fund paid Epstein $15 million for introducing the firm to JPMorgan Chase, which acquired a majority stake for $1.3 billion in 2004
This single transaction generated $127 million in revenues for Epstein in 2004, his best year on record
Financial Trust Company / Southern Trust Company
Epstein’s own Virgin Islands-based financial vehicles, established in 1998 and 2011 respectively
Used to pay Maxwell and manage the “economic development program” that saved Epstein $300 million in taxes between 1999โ2018
One account used to pay Maxwell had previously been flagged for sex trafficking activity
Honeycomb Partners & TD Bank
According to Wall Street Journal reporting, these firms maintained ties with Epstein during various phases of his operations
THE CLIENTS: BILLIONAIRES WHO FUELED THE MACHINE
Epstein’s financial network relied on a small circle of ultra-wealthy clients who provided the capital that sustained his criminal enterprise:ClientFirm/RolePayments to EpsteinStatusLeslie Wexner L Brands (Victoria’s Secret, Bath & Body Works) $200+ million (1991โ2007) Denied knowledge of crimes; gave Epstein power of attorney Leon Black Apollo Global Management $170 million (2012โ2017) Settled for $62.5M; granted criminal immunity in USVI Elizabeth Johnson Johnson & Johnson heiress Undisclosed Deceased 2017 Glenn Dubin Highbridge Capital Management $15 million (introducer fee) No charges filed
THE COMPLIANCE BREAKDOWN: How Banks Failed
The Epstein case represents a catastrophic failure of the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA) framework, which mandates that financial institutions file Suspicious Activity Reports (SARs) within 60 days of detecting potentially criminal transactions.
Key systemic failures identified:
Delayed Reporting: Banks filed SARs years after detecting suspicious activity, if at all
Executive Override: Compliance officers’ concerns were routinely overridden by senior executives attracted to Epstein’s lucrative accounts
Retroactive Compliance: JPMorgan filed SARs covering 300x more transactions after Epstein’s death than during his lifetime
Client Confidentiality Over Public Safety: Banks prioritized relationships with billionaires like Black over their legal obligations to report potential trafficking
As Senator Ron Wyden (D-OR) stated in his March 2025 investigation: “Bank executives tuned out compliance officers who were alarmed by Epstein’s transactions, seemingly withheld evidence of potential money laundering, and coached Epstein on how to obscure suspiciously large cash withdrawals. This goes beyond a total compliance breakdown.”
THE UNANSWERED QUESTIONS
Despite the document releases, critical questions remain:
1. Where is the rest of the money? The $1.5 billion in flagged transactions represents only what banks voluntarily reported. The true scope of Epstein’s financial network remains unknown.
2. Why no criminal charges against banks? JPMorgan, Deutsche Bank, and Bank of America have paid hundreds of millions in civil settlements but faced no criminal prosecution for potential money laundering or complicity in sex trafficking.
3. What about the “client list”? While Attorney General Pam Bondi claimed in February 2025 that a “client list” was “sitting on my desk,” FBI officials have testified under oath that no such comprehensive list was found. The “black books” that do existโcontact directories compiled by Ghislaine Maxwellโcontain 1,731 names but are described by investigators as “red herrings” rather than evidence of criminal participation.
4. Who else was financed by Black’s $170 million? The admission that Black’s payments funded Epstein’s Virgin Islands operations raises the question: which other billionaires’ money sustained the network?
5. Why is Treasury Secretary Bessent refusing to release records? Senator Wyden has identified Secretary Scott Bessent as part of “the Epstein coverup” for refusing to produce Treasury Department files containing thousands of bank records, despite Congressional demands.
๐ EXCLUSIVE INTELLIGENCE
This public analysis represents only a fraction of the financial documentation available. For subscribers to Patreon.com/berndpulch, the following deep-dive materials are available:
Complete JPMorgan email archive between Epstein and Jes Staley (redacted portions)
Deutsche Bank internal compliance memos showing executive override of SAR filings
Leon Black payment schedules and correspondence with Epstein regarding “tax planning”
Offshore entity structures mapped through Paradise Papers connections
Updated victim settlement documents and non-prosecution agreements
Congressional hearing transcripts with FBI Director Patel and Treasury officials
Note: Due to recent hack/sabotage attacks targeting our previous Patreon infrastructure, we are also launching Patron’s Vaultโan ultra-secure, independent membership platform directly integrated into berndpulch.org. To join the waiting list for enhanced security features and direct document access, email office@berndpulch.org with subject line “Patron’s Vault Waiting List.”
CONCLUSION: The Architecture of Impunity
The Epstein financial network reveals a disturbing truth about modern capitalism: that the infrastructure of global finance can be hijacked to sustain criminal enterprises, and that institutional safeguards designed to prevent exactly this outcome can be neutralized by the promise of fees from billionaires.
As the House Oversight Committee continues its investigationโand as the Trump administration faces pressure to release remaining documentsโthe focus must shift from Epstein as an individual aberration to the systemic conditions that enabled his crimes. The banks that serviced him, the billionaires who paid him, and the regulators who failed to intervene all remain active in the financial system today.
The $1.5 billion is accounted for. The full costโin human suffering and institutional credibilityโremains incalculable.
Tags: Epstein files, financial networks, JPMorgan Chase, Deutsche Bank, Bank of America, Leon Black, Apollo Global Management, Jes Staley, money laundering, sex trafficking, Wall Street corruption, Bank Secrecy Act, suspicious activity reports, offshore finance, U.S. Virgin Islands, Ghislaine Maxwell, compliance failure
Bernd Pulch (M.A.) is a forensic expert, founder of Aristotle AI, entrepreneur, political commentator, satirist, and investigative journalist covering lawfare, media control, investment, real estate, and geopolitics. His work examines how legal systems are weaponized, how capital flows shape policy, how artificial intelligence concentrates power, and what democracy loses when courts and markets become battlefields.
German prosecutors arrived before sunrise, moving with the precision of an operation long in the making. By midโmorning, investigators from the Frankfurt Public Prosecutorโs Office and the Federal Criminal Police Office were inside Deutsche Bankโs twin towers, securing documents, imaging servers, and interviewing compliance personnel. A parallel team entered the bankโs Berlin offices. The message was unmistakable: Germanyโs largest lender was once again under the microscope, and this time the scrutiny cut directly into the bankโs core operations.
The raids form part of a widening moneyโlaundering investigation focused on offshore corporate structures and delayed suspiciousโactivity reporting tied to sanctioned Russian interests. While prosecutors have not named individuals, the language of the warrantโโunknown responsible parties and employeesโโsignals a systemic probe rather than a hunt for a single bad actor. For Deutsche Bank, the timing could hardly have been worse. The operation unfolded just one day before the bank was set to present one of its strongest earnings reports in yearsโa record โฌ6.1 billion net profit, more than double the previous yearโdelivering a symbolic reminder that its past continues to shadow its attempts at reinvention .
The Abramovich Connection
At the center of the investigation lies Roman Abramovich, the billionaire Russian oligarch best known internationally as the former owner of Chelsea Football Club. Abramovich built his fortune during the chaotic postโSoviet privatization of the 1990s, acquiring vast interests in oil, steel, and aluminum to become one of Russiaโs wealthiest men and a fixture in Londonโs elite social circles .
His acquisition of Chelsea FC in 2003 transformed English football, but his fortune remained entangled with the Kremlinโs orbit. Following Russiaโs fullโscale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, the European Union sanctioned Abramovich, freezing his assets and alleging that his wealth provided “substantial revenue to the Government of Russia” and that he enjoyed “preferential treatment and protection from [its] supplying revenues” . British and Canadian authorities followed suit, forcing his divestiture from Chelsea and restricting his global movements.
German prosecutors are now examining whether Deutsche Bank maintained adequate safeguards while handling transactions for Abramovichโlinked corporate vehicles between 2013 and 2018โyears when the bank processed substantial flows for these entities . The specific allegation, confirmed by CEO Christian Sewing, centers on a suspiciousโactivity report (SAR) that was allegedly filed too late, potentially violating Germanyโs Money Laundering Act which mandates immediate reporting of suspicious transactions to the Financial Intelligence Unit .
A Bank Perpetually Haunted by Its Legacy
Deutsche Bank has spent the better part of a decade trying to distance itself from the scandals that defined its postโcrisis era: mirrorโtrading schemes, Balticโregion money flows, compliance failures in its assetโmanagement arm, and repeated fines from U.S. and European regulators. Each episode forced the bank to promise deeper reforms, stronger oversight, and a more conservative client portfolio.
Yet the institutionโs global footprint and longโstanding relationships with politically exposed or offshoreโlinked clients have proven difficult to unwind. The latest investigation appears to stem from historical business tiesโcorporate vehicles registered in jurisdictions known for secrecy, used by clients who later became subject to EU sanctions. Prosecutors are examining whether Deutsche Bankโs compliance teams failed to file timely suspiciousโactivity reports, a recurring vulnerability that regulators have flagged for years.
The Offshore Web Under Scrutiny
Investigators are focusing on a cluster of foreign companies that moved funds through Deutsche Bank accounts during the 2013โ2018 period. These entities, linked to Abramovichโs extensive network, utilized structures in jurisdictions known for financial secrecy to move capital through the German banking system .
The question for prosecutors is not merely whether the transactions were suspicious, but whether Deutsche Bank recognized the escalating risk as Abramovich came under international sanctions and acted quickly enough once those risks materialized. The bankโs compliance systems have long been criticized for their complexity and fragmentation. Internal alerts often require manual review, and past investigations revealed backlogs of unprocessed warnings.
Procsecutors are now combing through internal emails, compliance logs, and archived transaction data to determine whether delays were the result of negligence, structural deficiencies, or deliberate inaction regarding the Abramovichโlinked accounts.
Germanyโs Enforcement Shift
The raids also reflect a broader political context. Germany has faced sustained criticism from EU partners for weak antiโmoneyโlaundering enforcement. Brussels has repeatedly urged Berlin to strengthen oversight, arguing that the countryโs financial systemโgiven its size and interconnectednessโposes systemic risks if left inadequately supervised.
A highโprofile operation against Deutsche Bank serves a dual purpose: it signals a tougher stance to European regulators and demonstrates to domestic audiences that even the countryโs most powerful financial institution is not beyond reach. For prosecutors, the case offers an opportunity to show that Germany is no longer the soft spot in Europeโs enforcement architecture.
Inside the Towers: What Investigators Are Looking For
Approximately 30 investigators arrived in plain clothes before dawn, executing search warrants with methodical precision . People familiar with similar operations say investigators typically focus on several categories of evidence:
Internal communications between compliance officers, relationship managers, and senior executives regarding the Abramovichโlinked entities
The specific suspiciousโactivity report and the timeline associated with its delayed filing
Transactionโmonitoring alerts from the 2013โ2018 period and how they were escalated or dismissed
Clientโonboarding files, including beneficialโownership documentation for the offshore companies
Crossโborder correspondence with branches or affiliates in London, Cyprus, or other offshore jurisdictions
The breadth of the search suggests prosecutors are examining not only individual decisions but the structural integrity of Deutsche Bankโs antiโmoneyโlaundering framework regarding highโrisk politically exposed persons (PEPs).
Pattern of Raids
This operation does not exist in isolation. It marks the fourth time since 2018 that German law enforcement has raided Deutsche Bankโs offices :
November 2018: 170 officers raided the bank over suspicions of helping clients set up offshore accounts in the British Virgin Islands, resulting in โฌ15 million in fines for AML shortfalls
April 2022: Raids over late suspiciousโactivity report filings and failure to report potential money laundering, ending in a โฌ7 million fine
May 2022: Prosecutors targeted asset manager DWS over greenwashing allegations
October 2022: Raids related to tax fraud investigations
Each operation has targeted different aspects of the bankโs operations, yet all have circled back to the same fundamental weakness: a compliance culture unable to match the sophistication of its clients or the speed of regulatory expectations.
A Reputational Blow at a Critical Moment
For Deutsche Bank, the reputational damage may prove more costly than any eventual fine. The bank has spent years trying to convince investors, regulators, and the public that it has turned a corner. CEO Christian Sewing has repeatedly emphasized cultural change, risk reduction, and a renewed focus on stability.
The razorโsharp timing of the raidsโexecuted 24 hours before Sewing was to present the bankโs triumphant โฌ6.1 billion profit announcementโsuggests prosecutors intended to deliver a message: record earnings do not grant immunity from compliance scrutiny .
Investors reacted immediately, with shares dipping 2% as markets absorbed the news . Analysts warn that even if the investigation results in modest penalties, the perception of recurring compliance failures could weigh on the bankโs valuation and strategic ambitions, particularly as it seeks to expand its investment banking operations in the United States and Asia.
What Comes Next
CEO Sewing has confirmed the bank is cooperating fully with the investigation, though he cautioned against premature speculation regarding outcomes or penalties . The investigation is expected to unfold over months, possibly years. Prosecutors will likely issue additional subpoenas, request crossโborder cooperation from UK and Swiss authorities familiar with Abramovichโs financial network, and interview current and former employees who managed the Russian client relationships during the critical 2013โ2018 window.
If the probe uncovers systemic deficiencies in how Deutsche Bank handled a sanctioned oligarchโs funds, regulators could impose enhanced monitoring requirements or mandate further structural reforms to the bankโs compliance architecture.
For Deutsche Bank, the challenge is twofold: managing the legal process while preserving the fragile trust it has rebuilt with markets and regulators. The bank insists it is cooperating fully, but cooperation alone will not shield it from the broader question now resurfacing across Europeโs financial community.
The Unresolved Question
Can a bank with such deep historical exposure to highโrisk clients ever fully escape the gravitational pull of its past?
Deutsche Bank has spent years trying to answer that question. The latest raids suggest Germanyโs prosecutors are now seeking their own answerโand they intend to find it inside the bankโs most guarded files, examining the specific moment when compliance systems encountered the vast wealth of a Russian oligarch, and chose, perhaps, to look away.
I’ll research the mechanisms, specific cases, and regulatory landscape of Russian money laundering through German real estate to provide you with a comprehensive deep dive. Let me gather more specific information on the mechanisms and recent cases involving Russian real estate acquisitions in Germany. Let me gather additional details on specific real estate schemes and the broader landscape of Russian property acquisitions in Germany. The Deep Dive: Russian Money Laundering and Sanctions Evasion via German Real Estate
While prosecutors raid Deutsche Bankโs towers in Frankfurt, the investigation merely scratches the surface of a larger phenomenon: the systemic penetration of Russian oligarchic capital into German real estate. The schemes range from sophisticated offshore structures in Bavariaโs luxury enclaves to brazen frauds involving forged Kremlin documents in Berlin. Together, they reveal how Germanyโs property marketโbolstered by strict banking secrecy, weak beneficial-ownership transparency, and a notary system that prioritized transaction speed over due diligenceโbecame a preferred destination for sanctioned Russian wealth.
I. The Infrastructure of Secrecy
Until recently, Germany offered an almost perfect architecture for concealing ownership. No restrictions on foreign property acquisition, no prohibition on cash transactions (cash purchases were permitted until April 2023), and no centralized beneficial-ownership verification created an environment where Russian buyers could operate with near-total anonymity .
The critical vulnerability lay in the Transparency Register (Transparenzregister). Until the implementation of the Sanctions Enforcement Act II in January 2023, foreign companies owning German real estate were not required to register their beneficial owners unless they were acquiring new property. For existing holdingsโpurchased before 2020โthere was no obligation to disclose who ultimately controlled the asset .
This loophole allowed structures like Tegernsee (IOM) Limited, an Isle of Man-registered shell company, to own a โฌ25 million villa on Lake Tegernsee for over a decade without revealing that its ultimate beneficiary was Alisher Usmanov, the sanctioned Russian metals magnate . When investigators finally raided the property in 2022, they discovered a 750-square-meter spa area, a 20-meter swimming pool, and staffing costs of โฌ77,000 per weekโall managed through layers of offshore entities that German authorities had no legal mechanism to penetrate until the 2023 reforms .
II. The Bavarian Riviera: Lake Tegernseeโs Oligarch Belt
The village of Rottach-Egern, perched on the shores of Lake Tegernsee in Bavaria, has earned the nickname “Moscow-on-the-Lake.” The area became a favored retreat for Russiaโs elite, offering both proximity to Munichโs medical facilities and the discretion of traditional German wealth management culture.
The Usmanov Network Usmanovโs footprint in Rottach-Egern illustrates the operational complexity of these investments. Between 2011 and 2022, he acquired four properties in the village with a combined value exceeding โฌ53 million, yet none were held in his name :
The Villa: Purchased for โฌ7.8 million in 2011 by Tegernsee Limited (Isle of Man), now listed for โฌ25 millionโthe highest residential asking price in German history
Staff Quarters: A duplex house for security personnel and drivers
The Boathouse: Sold for โฌ1 million by insolvency administrators
Additional holdings: Acquired through separate offshore structures
Investigators allege Usmanov used these properties as his primary residence from 2014 onward, keeping them staffed with 12 employees year-round while claiming to German tax authorities that he was merely a renter paying โฌ77,000 per week . This residency statusโor lack thereofโbecame the crux of a tax evasion investigation by Munich prosecutors, distinct from the money-laundering probes that resulted in โฌ10 million in settlements without admission of guilt .
The Enforcement Paradox When German customs officials raided Usmanovโs properties in September 2022, they deployed 250 officersโa show of force that yielded seized luxury vehicles, 30 paintings (valued at โฌ5 million), and four Fabergรฉ eggs (later determined to be fakes). Yet a Frankfurt court later ruled these searches unlawful, and the seized assets were ordered returned. In November 2024, prosecutors dropped money-laundering charges in exchange for a โฌ4 million payment, followed by a โฌ10 million settlement in December 2025 to close sanctions-violation investigations .
Critically, the villa sale proceedsโcurrently administered by insolvency trustee Ulrich Cramerโwill service the debts of the offshore shell company, not necessarily satisfy sanction enforcement or tax claims. Usmanov remains the economic beneficiary in all but legal title.
III. The Berlin Con: Forged Kremlin Papers and Real Estate Fraud
If Bavaria represents sophisticated wealth preservation, Berlin illustrates outright criminal exploitation of Germanyโs property system. In 2022, investigators uncovered a scheme involving Jefim B., a 60-year-old Berlin dentist, who allegedly used forged powers of attorney from Vladimir Putinโs Presidential Administration to sell Russian state-owned properties worth โฌ13.5 million .
The Scheme The dentist claimed to represent the Russian government in transactions involving:
A 17,000-square-meter section of the Karlshorst airfield (including historic Soviet military facilities)
Three residential buildings formerly housing Soviet officers
Attempted sales of the former USSR Consulate General in West Berlin (โฌ1.6 million)
A lakeside property in Brandenburg used by embassy staff (โฌ300,000)
A planned sale of Unter den Linden 51, a building within the Russian Embassy complex itself
The dentist presented documents bearing the Presidential Administrationโs seal and double-headed eagle to notaries, who notarized the transactions despite filing suspicious-activity reports (SARs). A district court judge ignored warnings from a legal officer that the dentist was acting as both sellerโs representative and buyerโs partner, noting only that he had “no more concerns” after reviewing additional forged powers of attorney .
The Network Investigators believe Jefim B. was working with Olena G., a Ukrainian woman posing as a Russian intelligence colonel who allegedly provided the forged documents and directed โฌ1.8 million in payments to a contact in Moscow. When the Russian Embassy discovered the fraudโafter new owners attempted to take possession of the Karlshorst airfieldโdiplomats confronted German judicial authorities, who initially rejected the embassyโs objection on procedural grounds .
The case exposes catastrophic gaps in Germanyโs property-transfer safeguards: notaries who lack authority to verify foreign governmental documents, land registries that accept registrations without validating underlying authority, and courts that prioritize transaction finality over fraud prevention.
IV. The Mechanics: Shell Companies and Share Deals
Russian investors have historically exploited two structural features of German real estate law: share deals (Share Deals) and notary confidentiality.
Share Deals Rather than purchasing real estate directly (triggering Grunderwerbsteuer of 3.5โ6.5%), buyers acquire shares in a company that owns the property. Until 2023, such transactions frequently escaped transparency-register reporting if the company was foreign-registered. The Federal Administrative Office clarified in May 2023 that foreign companies in the ownership chain must report beneficial owners if they hold 90% or more of shares, but compliance remains voluntary until enforcement .
Notary System Vulnerabilities German notaries (Notare) are mandatory gatekeepers for property transactions, yet they historically lacked tools to verify foreign beneficial ownership. Under the Anti-Money Laundering Act (GwG) amendments, notaries must now refuse to notarize transactions if foreign companies fail to register beneficial owners in the Transparency Register . However, the system relies on self-reporting, and penaltiesโup to โฌ150,000 for first-time offensesโmay be insufficient to deter multi-million-euro laundering schemes .
V. The Data Void: How Much Russian Real Estate Exists?
Despite the high-profile cases, Germany has no reliable data on Russian-owned real estate. According to the Interior Ministry, there is no evidence that property purchases by Russian nationals served intelligence purposes, but officials confirmed they cannot determine how many properties Russians own or whether any are located near critical infrastructure .
A study by the ifo Institute analyzing five German states found that approximately 5% of real estate companies (roughly 1,000 entities) trace back to “shadow financial centers.” Extrapolated nationwide, this suggests 15,000โ20,000 companies in Germanyโs real estate sector require deeper investigation regarding beneficial ownership .
Similarly, foreign direct investment screeningโintended to block acquisitions near military bases or infrastructureโfailed to capture Russian acquisitions made through EU shell companies or strawmen. The case of Frankfurt-Hahn Airport, where a Russian investor attempted to acquire a stake in 2023, prompted government intervention only after public outcry, not through routine regulatory screening .
VI. Post-2022 Reforms and Enforcement Gaps
The invasion of Ukraine triggered a cascade of legislative changes:
Sanctions Enforcement Act II (2023)
Extended Transparency Register obligations to existing foreign-owned real estate (deadline: June 30, 2023)
Prohibited cash transactions over โฌ10,000 for real estate purchases
Expanded notary verification requirements
Asset Seizure Initiatives Germanyโs Federal Prosecutor has sought to confiscate โฌ720 million in frozen Russian Central Bank assets held in Frankfurt, though legal proceedings regarding sovereign immunity continue . Total frozen Russian assets in Germany amount to โฌ3.95 billion as of May 2024, down from โฌ5.25 billion in March 2023โa decline attributed to valuation fluctuations and legal challenges .
Settlement Culture The German enforcement model favors financial settlements over criminal conviction. Usmanovโs โฌ10 million payment to drop sanctions investigations follows a pattern where oligarchs pay substantial sums (โฌ4 million to Frankfurt prosecutors in November 2024, โฌ10 million to Munich prosecutors in December 2025) while maintaining innocence and retaining underlying assets . Critics argue this creates a “cost of doing business” approach to sanctions evasion rather than genuine deterrence.
VII. Systemic Deficiencies
Federal Fragmentation Germanyโs decentralized structure hinders coordination. Real estate registration occurs at 400 local land registries (Grundbรผcher) maintained by district courts, with no national database linking ownership to sanctions lists .
Cash Economy Legacy Despite 2023 reforms, Germanyโs historical tolerance for cash transactionsโโฌ100,000 or more could change hands for property with minimal reportingโcreated deep reservoirs of untraceable wealth recycled into real estate .
The “Naming and Shaming” Failure While the Transparency Register theoretically publishes names of non-compliant entities, investigative journalists note that less than 30% of Berlin real estate holding companies were registered as required, suggesting enforcement remains theoretical rather than practical .
Conclusion: The Unfinished Raid
The Deutsche Bank investigation represents merely the financial tentacle of a much larger real estate ecosystem that absorbed Russian capital for two decades. From the manicured lawns of Lake Tegernsee to the crumbling Soviet architecture of Karlshorst, German property markets served as both storehouses for oligarchic wealth and instruments for sanctions evasion.
The 2023 Transparency Register reforms and cash-transaction bans have closed the most egregious loopholes, but the legacy holdingsโthousands of properties acquired during the permissive eraโremain largely opaque. As Usmanovโs villa lists for โฌ25 million and insolvency administrators puzzle over offshore corporate debts, the question persists: Can Germanyโs enforcement infrastructure ever match the sophistication of the wealth structures it now claims to dismantle?
Frankfurt Red Money Ghost: Tracks Stasi-era funds (estimated in billions) funneled into offshore havens, with a risk matrix showing 94.6% institutional counterparty risk and 82.7% money laundering probability.
Global Hole & Dark Data Analysis: Exposes an โฌ8.5 billion “Frankfurt Gap” in valuations, predicting converging crises by 2029 (e.g., 92% probability of a $15โ25 trillion commercial real estate collapse).
Ruhr-Valuation Gap (2026): Forensic audit identifying โฌ1.2 billion in ghost tenancy patterns and โฌ100 billion in maturing debt discrepancies.
Nordic Debt Wall (2026): Details a โฌ12 billion refinancing cliff in Swedish real estate, linked to broader EU market distortions.
Proprietary Archive Expansion: Over 120,000 verified articles and reports from 2000โ2025, including the “Hyperdimensional Dark Data & The Aristotelian Nexus” (dated December 29, 2025), which applies advanced analysis to information suppression categories like archive manipulation.
List of Stasi agents 90,000 plus Securitate Agent List.
Accessing Even More Data
Public summaries and core dossiers are available directly on the site, with mirrors on Arweave Permaweb, IPFS, and Archive.is for preservation. For full raw datasets or restricted items (e.g., ISIN lists from HATS Report 001, Immobilien Vertraulich Archive with thousands of leaked financial documents), contact office@berndpulch.org using PGP or Signal encryption. Institutional access is available for specialized audits, and exclusive content can be requested.
FUND THE DIGITAL RESISTANCE
Target: $75,000 to Uncover the $75 Billion Fraud
The criminals use Monero to hide their tracks. We use it to expose them. This is digital warfare, and truth is the ultimate cryptocurrency.
BREAKDOWN: THE $75,000 TRUTH EXCAVATION
Phase 1: Digital Forensics ($25,000)
ยท Blockchain archaeology following Monero trails ยท Dark web intelligence on EBL network operations ยท Server infiltration and data recovery
Phase 2: Operational Security ($20,000)
ยท Military-grade encryption and secure infrastructure ยท Physical security for investigators in high-risk zones ยท Legal defense against multi-jurisdictional attacks
ยท Multi-language investigative reporting ยท Secure data distribution networks ยท Legal evidence packaging for international authorities
CONTRIBUTION IMPACT
$75 = Preserves one critical document from GDPR deletion $750 = Funds one dark web intelligence operation $7,500 = Secures one investigator for one month $75,000 = Exposes the entire criminal network
SECURE CONTRIBUTION CHANNEL
Monero (XMR) – The Only Truly Private Option
45cVWS8EGkyJvTJ4orZBPnF4cLthRs5xk45jND8pDJcq2mXp9JvAte2Cvdi72aPHtLQt3CEMKgiWDHVFUP9WzCqMBZZ57y4 This address is dedicated exclusively to this investigation. All contributions are cryptographically private and untraceable.
Monero QR Code (Scan to donate anonymously):
(Copy-paste the address if scanning is not possible: 45cVWS8EGkyJvTJ4orZBPnF4cLthRs5xk45jND8pDJcq2mXp9JvAte2Cvdi72aPHtLQt3CEMKgiWDHVFUP9WzCqMBZZ57y4)
Translations of the Patron’s Vault Announcement: (Full versions in German, French, Spanish, Russian, Arabic, Portuguese, Simplified Chinese, and Hindi are included in the live site versions.)
Copyright Notice (All Rights Reserved)
English: ยฉ 2000โ2026 Bernd Pulch. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, distributed, or transmitted in any form or by any means without the prior written permission of the author.
(Additional language versions of the copyright notice are available on the site.)
โยฉBERNDPULCH โ ABOVE TOP SECRET ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS โ THE ONLY MEDIA WITH LICENSE TO SPY โ๏ธ Follow @abovetopsecretxxl for more. ๐ GOD BLESS YOU ๐
Your support keeps the truth alive โ true information is the most valuable resource!
๐๏ธ Compliance & Legal Repository Footer
Formal Notice of Evidence Preservation
This digital repository serves as a secure, redundant mirror for the Bernd Pulch Master Archive. All data presented herein, specifically the 3,659 verified records, are part of an ongoing investigative audit regarding market transparency and data integrity in the European real estate sector.
Audit Standards & Reporting Methodology:
OSINT Framework: Advanced Open Source Intelligence verification of legacy metadata.
Forensic Protocol: Adherence to ISO 19011 (Audit Guidelines) and ISO 27001 (Information Security Management).
Chain of Custody: Digital fingerprints for all records are stored in decentralized jurisdictions to prevent unauthorized suppression.
Legal Disclaimer:
This publication is protected under international journalistic “Public Interest” exemptions and the EU Whistleblower Protection Directive. Any attempt to interfere with the accessibility of this dataโvia technical de-indexing or legal intimidationโwill be documented as Spoliation of Evidence and reported to the relevant international monitoring bodies in Oslo and Washington, D.C.
What if German reunification was less a marriage and more a corporate takeover? How do you privatize an entire country? After the Berlin Wall fell, the “Treuhand” agency sold off East Germanyโs entire economy in four years. This is the true story of the largest liquidation in world history. Treuhand #GermanReunification #EastGermany #Privatization #EconomicHistory #BerlinWall #Documentary #DWDocumentary #History
By Peter Mireaux Jan. 27, 202 2:01 am ET
BERLINโIn the cold night of Dec. 2, 1989, Stasi Colonel Alexander Schalck-Golodkowski sat in a Russian limousine at the Invalidenstraรe border crossing, waiting to flee to West Berlin. In his possession were secretsโand suitcasesโthat would shape the economic future of a vanishing nation.
Just months later, an agency born from a dissident think tankโs proposal would become the most powerful economic institution in postwar Germany: the Treuhandanstalt, the trust agency tasked with privatizing East Germanyโs entire state-owned economy.
Drawing on archival records, previously unpublished notes, and eyewitness accounts, a new narrative emerges of how West German politicians, bankers, and industrialists orchestrated what became known as โthe largest liquidation in world historyโโa process that would dismantle, sell, or shutter over 8,000 East German enterprises between 1990 and 1994.
The Think Tank and the โPeopleโs Propertyโ
In Potsdam, as the Berlin Wall cracked, a group of scientists and dissidents gathered in a wild garden they called the โfree Babelsberg heights.โ Among them was physicist Gerd Gebhardt, who had predicted the coming collapse of the German Democratic Republic (GDR) in his doctoral thesis.
Fearing an economic invasion by the West German Deutschmark, the group drafted a proposal in early 1990: a โtrust agencyโ to hold East Germanyโs โpeopleโs propertyโ in trust for its citizens, who would receive share certificatesโa form of citizen participation in the soon-to-be privatized economy.
Their proposal reached the Round Table, the forum where opposition groups negotiated with the fading socialist government. On Feb. 12, 1990, Gebhardt presented the idea, and it was unanimously adopted.
But the vision of a citizen-owned trust was short-lived.
West German Banks and Backroom Deals
Even before East Germanyโs first free elections in March 1990, West German corporations were positioning themselves. Edgar Most, deputy head of the East German State Bank, secretly negotiated with Deutsche Bank executives to spin off its most valuable assets into a new entityโthe Deutsche Kreditbank AGโwhich Deutsche Bank would effectively control.
Similarly, Allianz AG quietly secured a 49% stake in the GDRโs state insurance monopoly by March 1990, sidelining competitors. Siemens, Thyssen, and other industrial giants began signing cooperation deals, often gaining access to customer lists, patents, and key personnel.
โThe race for the best positions in East Germany has begun,โ Japanese Nomura Corporation executive Takashi Sato told East German researchers visiting Geneva in February 1990. โBut the West German corporations will not allow outsiders in. Itโs a closed shop.โ
The โD-Mark Armyโ and Political Pressure
Chancellor Helmut Kohlโs government pushed for rapid monetary union, using the promise of the Deutschmark as leverage. โIf we get the D-Mark, weโll stay; if not, weโll go to it,โ became a rallying cry in East German streets.
Behind closed doors, West German officials like Finance Ministry strategist Thilo Sarrazin made clear: the D-Mark would only come with the โcomplete transfer of the West German system.โ The East would have to accept what one CDU minister called โunconditional economic capitulation.โ
The Treuhand Law: A โBook of Last Judgmentโ
The Treuhand law, passed under immense time pressure in June 1990, deviated sharply from the original participatory model. Instead of citizen shares, it mandated rapid privatization. Detlev Karsten Rohwedder, a former steel manager and SPD member, was appointed to lead the agency.
Rohwedder, who once compared East Germany to โa patient in intensive care,โ now oversaw a body that would sell or close thousands of firms. The Treuhandโs mission was not to nurture East German ownership, but to maximize proceeds and minimize costs to the West German taxpayer.
โWhoever pays the most, gets it,โ interim Treuhand head Peter Moreth had said in an interviewโwords that would define the agencyโs ruthless pragmatism.
Lobbyists and โWild Eastโ Capitalism
West German lobbyists descended on the East German parliament. Energy giants RWE, Bayernwerk, and PreussenElektra carved up the Eastโs power grid among themselves in a pre-emptive cartel.
โWe could pass as many laws as we wanted in the Volkskammer,โ recalled Reinhard Hรถppner, then a vice president of the East German parliament. โBut West German laws had already spread here long before.โ
Legacy: Shock Without Ownership
When the Treuhand finished its work in 1994, it had privatized over 13,000 state-owned properties. Millions of jobs were lost; few East Germans gained a stake in the new economy. The agency became synonymous with deindustrialization and bitterness in the East.
The idea of citizen sharesโonce championed by dissidents like Wolfgang Ullmann and Matthias Artztโwas buried. โWe were hunted,โ recalled former East German Finance Minister Walter Romberg of the negotiations with Bonn.
What remained was a reunified Germany whose eastern half felt less like a partner and more like a colonyโa sentiment that continues to shape German politics today.
INDEX OF PERSONS
Alexander Schalck-Golodkowski โ Stasi colonel and head of Kommerzielle Koordinierung (KoKo), the GDRโs shadowy foreign trade agency. Fled to West Germany in December 1989.
Gerd Gebhardt โ East German physicist and dissident. Co-author of the original Treuhand proposal advocating citizen shares in peopleโs property.
Matthias Artzt โ Chemist and member of the โFree Research Group Self-Organization.โ Worked with Gebhardt on the Treuhand concept.
Wolfgang Ullmann โ Theologian and dissident. Served as minister without portfolio in the Modrow government and pushed for the Treuhand model at the Round Table.
Detlef Scheunert โ Former NVA officer and later referent in the East German Ministry for Heavy Machinery. Witness to the Treuhandโs formation and later employee.
Edgar Most โ Deputy head of the East German State Bank. Secretly negotiated the takeover of its assets by Deutsche Bank.
Detlev Karsten Rohwedder โ Former CEO of Hoesch, appointed president of the Treuhandanstalt in 1990. Assassinated in 1991.
Helmut Kohl โ West German chancellor. Drove rapid monetary and economic union.
Theo Waigel โ West German finance minister. Key negotiator of the State Treaty on Monetary Union.
Thilo Sarrazin โ Senior official in the West German Finance Ministry. Architect of the โsystem transferโ strategy.
Walter Romberg โ East German finance minister (SPD). Described signing the State Treaty as an โact of submission.โ
Lothar de Maiziรจre โ First and only freely elected prime minister of the GDR.
Peter Moreth โ First head of the Treuhandanstalt, quickly sidelined for advocating citizen participation.
Wolfram Krause โ State secretary in the East German Ministry of Economics. Drafted the final Treuhand law under West German influence.
Werner Schulz โ Civil rights activist and MP for Bรผndnis 90. Critic of the Treuhandโs centralized structure.
Reinhard Hรถppner โ SPD MP and vice president of the East German Volkskammer.
Uwe Haasen โ Allianz AG executive who negotiated the takeover of the GDRโs state insurance monopoly.
Hilmar Kopper โ CEO of Deutsche Bank. Oversaw the takeover of East German banking assets.
Takashi Sato โ Nomura Corporation executive in Geneva. Expressed interest in East German investments but predicted West German exclusion.
Albrecht Graf Matuschka โ West German financial advisor who publicly promoted โpeopleโs sharesโ for East Germans.
Martin Schlaff โ Austrian businessman with ties to the Stasi. Hired former Stasi officers as โmanagers.โ
Karl Otto Pรถhl โ President of the Bundesbank. Initially opposed rapid monetary union.
Horst Teltschik โ Foreign policy advisor to Chancellor Kohl.
Philip Wright โ British privatization expert consulted by the GDR government. Compared the Treuhand process to the Domesday Book.
INDEX OF ORGANIZATIONS
Treuhandanstalt โ Trust agency created to privatize East German state-owned enterprises.
Kommerzielle Koordinierung (KoKo) โ GDRโs commercial coordination unit, led by Schalck-Golodkowski, used to acquire hard currency and bypass embargoes.
Deutsche Bank โ West German bank that acquired key assets of the East German State Bank through the Deutsche Kreditbank AG.
Allianz AG โ West German insurance giant that secured a 49% stake in the GDRโs state insurance monopoly in early 1990.
Siemens โ West German electronics conglomerate that signed numerous cooperation agreements with East German firms before reunification.
Nomura Corporation โ Japanese financial group that explored investment opportunities in East Germany.
Round Table โ Forum for dialogue between the GDR government and opposition groups in 1989โ1990.
Freie Forschungsgemeinschaft Selbstorganisation โ Dissident think tank that developed the original Treuhand proposal.
Bundesnachrichtendienst (BND) โ West German foreign intelligence service. Monitored KoKo activities and debriefed Schalck-Golodkowski after his defection.
Staatliche Versicherung der DDR โ East Germanyโs state insurance monopoly, partially acquired by Allianz.
Deutsche Kreditbank AG โ Bank created from assets of the East German State Bank, controlled by Deutsche Bank and Dresdner Bank.
RWE, Bayernwerk, PreussenElektra โ West German energy giants that formed a cartel to divide East Germanyโs energy market.
Wirtschaftsrat der CDU โ Business lobby group that helped draft the Treuhand law.
Bundeskartellamt โ German Federal Cartel Office. Criticized energy sector carve-up but had limited jurisdiction in the East pre-unification.
SPD-Ost โ Social Democratic Party in East Germany, part of the first freely elected government.
CDU-Ost โ East German Christian Democratic Union, leading party in the 1990 election coalition โAllianz fรผr Deutschland.โ
PDS โ Party of Democratic Socialism, successor to the SED.
Neues Forum โ Major East German civil rights movement.
Ministerium fรผr Staatssicherheit (MfS/Stasi) โ East German state security service.
Staatsbank der DDR โ East German state bank, largely dismantled before reunification.
Berliner Handels- und Finanzierungsgesellschaft (BHFG) โ Successor entity to KoKo, later under Treuhand control.
Effect Vermรถgensverwaltungs GmbH โ Subsidiary of BHFG, managed by former KoKo staff including Waltraud Lisowski.
APPENDIX
Albrecht Graf Matuschka, the West German financial advisor who publicly championed the idea of โpeopleโs sharesโ for East Germans during the reunification period, later became infamous for one of Germanyโs most notorious white-collar crimes.
The Matuschka Group and Financial Decline
In the years following his 1990 television appearances, Matuschkaโs financial empire, the Matuschka Group, began to unravel. The group, which had once managed billions of Deutsche Marks for wealthy clients and institutions, faced severe financial difficulties in the mid-1990s due to risky investments and market downturns.
The Fraud and Life Insurance Murder Plot (1994)
Matuschkaโs downfall culminated in a spectacular criminal case. In 1994, he was arrested and later convicted for masterminding a complex fraud scheme centered on a life insurance policy.
ยท The Scheme: Matuschka took out a multi-million Deutschmark life insurance policy on an employee, Jรผrgen K., naming his own companies as beneficiaries. ยท The Murder: In September 1994, Matuschka hired a hitman to murder the employee in a staged car accident in Hungary, intending to collect the insurance payout to save his crumbling business empire. ยท Investigation and Trial: The murder was initially deemed an accident, but police suspicions grew. The hired killer, facing separate murder charges, eventually confessed. Matuschka was arrested in November 1994.
Conviction and Imprisonment
ยท In 1997, after a high-profile trial, Albrecht Graf Matuschka was found guilty of murder for financial gain and fraud. ยท He was sentenced to life imprisonment. ยท The Munich Regional Court stated that the crime was committed out of greed and to maintain a luxurious lifestyle, describing it as โparticularly reprehensible.โ
Later Years and Death
ยท Matuschka served his sentence in various prisons, including Straubing and later in a prison hospital due to declining health. ยท He maintained his innocence for years but eventually made partial admissions. ยท Albrecht Graf Matuschka died in prison on August 22, 2018, at the age of 78, after suffering from Parkinsonโs disease and other ailments.
Irony and Legacy
His later fate stands in stark contrast to his 1990 persona as a potential savior of East German savings. While publicly advocating for a fair distribution of โpeopleโs propertyโ to empower East German citizens, he was privately orchestrating a desperate and brutal scheme to defraud the very financial system he purported to champion. His case remains a landmark example of white-collar crime escalating to murder in German legal history.
Der groรe deutsche Goldrausch: Wie die Treuhandanstalt den wirtschaftlichen Umbruch im Osten steuerte
Neu aufgedeckte Details enthรผllen die unerzรคhlte Geschichte der deutschen Privatisierungsbehรถrde, die Akteure, die sie prรคgten, und das bleibende Erbe des โSchocktherapieโ-Wiedervereinigungsprozesses.
Von Peter Mireaux
BERLIN โ In der kalten Nacht zum 3. Dezember 1989 saร Stasi-Oberst Alexander Schalck-Golodkowski in einer russischen Limousine am Grenzรผbergang Invalidenstraรe und wartete darauf, nach West-Berlin zu fliehen. Bei sich trug er Geheimnisse โ und Koffer โ, die die wirtschaftliche Zukunft eines untergehenden Staates prรคgen sollten.
Nur wenige Monate spรคter sollte eine Behรถrde, die aus dem Vorschlag einer Dissidenten-Denkfabrik geboren wurde, zur mรคchtigsten Wirtschaftsinstitution im Deutschland der Nachkriegszeit werden: die Treuhandanstalt, der Treuhรคnder, der mit der Privatisierung der gesamten volkseigenen Wirtschaft Ostdeutschlands beauftragt war.
Gestรผtzt auf Archivunterlagen, bisherer unverรถffentlichte Notizen und Augenzeugenberichte zeichnet sich eine neue Erzรคhlung darรผber ab, wie westdeutsche Politiker, Banker und Industrielle das orchestrierten, was als โdie grรถรte Abwicklung der Weltgeschichteโ bekannt wurde โ ein Prozess, der zwischen 1990 und 1994 รผber 8.000 ostdeutsche Betriebe zerschlagen, verkaufen oder schlieรen sollte.
Die Denkfabrik und das โVolkseigentumโ
In Potsdam, als die Berliner Mauer brรถckelte, traf sich eine Gruppe von Wissenschaftlern und Dissidenten in einem verwilderten Garten, den sie die โfreie Babelsberger Hรถheโ nannten. Unter ihnen war der Physiker Gerd Gebhardt, der in seiner Doktorarbeit den bevorstehenden Kollaps der Deutschen Demokratischen Republik (DDR) vorhergesagt hatte.
Aus Furcht vor einer wirtschaftlichen Invasion durch die westdeutsche D-Mark entwarf die Gruppe Anfang 1990 einen Vorschlag: eine โTreuhandanstaltโ, die das โVolkseigentumโ Ostdeutschlands treuhรคnderisch fรผr seine Bรผrger halten sollte, die Anteilscheine erhalten wรผrden โ eine Form der Bรผrgerbeteiligung an der bald zu privatisierenden Wirtschaft.
Ihr Vorschlag erreichte den Runden Tisch, das Forum, an dem Oppositionsgruppen mit der abtretenden sozialistischen Regierung verhandelten. Am 12. Februar 1990 prรคsentierte Gebhardt die Idee, und sie wurde einstimmig angenommen.
Doch die Vision eines bรผrgereigenen Treuhandfonds war nur von kurzer Dauer.
Westdeutsche Banken und Hinterzimmer-Deals
Noch vor den ersten freien Wahlen in der DDR im Mรคrz 1990 positionierten sich westdeutsche Konzerne. Edgar Most, stellvertretender Chef der DDR-Staatsbank, verhandelte heimlich mit Vorstรคnden der Deutschen Bank, um deren wertvollste Vermรถgenswerte in eine neue Einheit auszugliedern โ die Deutsche Kreditbank AG, die die Deutsche Bank effektiv kontrollieren sollte.
Ebenso sicherte sich die Allianz AG still und leich Anfang 1990 eine 49 %-Beteiligung am Versicherungsmonopol der DDR und drรคngte Konkurrenten aus dem Feld. Siemens, Thyssen und andere Industriegiganten begannen, Kooperationsvertrรคge zu unterzeichnen und erhielten dabei oft Zugang zu Kundenlisten, Patenten und Schlรผsselpersonal.
โEin Windhundrennen um die besten Plรคtze in Ostdeutschland hat bei Ihnen begonnenโ, sagte der japanische Nomura-Corporation-Manager Takashi Sato im Februar 1990 ostdeutschen Forschern in Genf. โAber das wird nicht funktionieren, die westdeutschen Konzerne werden das nicht zulassen. Es ist ein geschlossener Laden.โ
Die โD-Mark-Armeeโ und der politische Druck
Die Regierung von Bundeskanzler Helmut Kohl drรคngte auf eine rasche Wรคhrungsunion und nutzte das Versprechen der D-Mark als Hebel. โKommt die D-Mark, bleiben wir, kommt sie nicht, gehโn wir zu ihrโ, wurde zum Slogan auf ostdeutschen Straรen.
Hinter verschlossenen Tรผren machten westdeutsche Beamte wie der Finanzministeriumsstratege Thilo Sarrazin deutlich: Die D-Mark gebe es nur im Tausch gegen den โvollstรคndigen Transfer des westdeutschen Systemsโ. Der Osten mรผsse akzeptieren, was ein CDU-Minister die โbedingungslose wirtschaftliche Kapitulationโ nannte.
Das Treuhandgesetz: Ein โBuch des Jรผngsten Gerichtsโ
Das Treuhandgesetz, das im Juni 1990 unter immensem Zeitdruck verabschiedet wurde, wich stark vom ursprรผnglichen Beteiligungsmodell ab. Statt Bรผrgeranteilen sah es eine schnelle Privatisierung vor. Detlev Karsten Rohwedder, ein ehemaliger Stahlmanager und SPD-Mitglied, wurde zum Prรคsidenten der Behรถrde ernannt.
Rohwedder, der Ostdeutschland einmal mit einem โPatienten auf der Intensivstationโ verglichen hatte, leitete nun eine Institution, die Tausende Betriebe verkaufen oder schlieรen sollte. Die Mission der Treuhand war nicht, ostdeutsches Eigentum zu fรถrdern, sondern die Erlรถse zu maximieren und die Kosten fรผr den westdeutschen Steuerzahler zu minimieren.
โWer am meisten zahlt, erhรคlt den Zuschlagโ, hatte der kommissarische Treuhandchef Peter Moreth in einem Interview gesagt โ Worte, die den rรผcksichtslosen Pragmatismus der Behรถrde definieren sollten.
Lobbyisten und โWilder Ostenโ-Kapitalismus
Westdeutsche Lobbyisten รผberschwemmten die ostdeutsche Volkskammer. Die Energieriesen RWE, Bayernwerk und PreussenElektra teilten das ostdeutsche Stromnetz in einem prรคventiven Kartell unter sich auf.
โWir konnten neue Gesetze in der Volkskammer erlassen, soviel wir wolltenโ, erinnerte sich Reinhard Hรถppner, damals Vizeprรคsident der Volkskammer. โAber die westdeutschen Gesetze hatten sich schon lange ausgebreitet.โ
Erbe: Schock ohne Eigentum
Als die Treuhand ihre Arbeit 1994 beendete, hatte sie รผber 13.000 volkseigene Betriebe privatisiert. Millionen Arbeitsplรคtze gingen verloren; nur wenige Ostdeutsche erhielten einen Anteil an der neuen Wirtschaft. Die Behรถrde wurde im Osten zum Synonym fรผr Deindustrialisierung und Verbitterung.
Die Idee der Bรผrgeranteile โ einst von Dissidenten wie Wolfgang Ullmann und Matthias Artzt verteidigt โ wurde begraben. โWir sind gejagt wordenโ, erinnerte sich der ehemalige DDR-Finanzminister Walter Romberg an die Verhandlungen mit Bonn.
Was blieb, war ein wiedervereinigtes Deutschland, dessen รถstliche Hรคlfte sich weniger wie ein Partner, sondern mehr wie eine Kolonie fรผhlte โ ein Gefรผhl, das bis heute die deutsche Politik prรคgt.
Das spรคtere Schicksal von Albrecht Graf Matuschka
Albrecht Graf Matuschka, der westdeutsche Vermรถgensberater, der 1990 รถffentlich fรผr โVolksaktienโ fรผr Ostdeutsche eintrat, wurde spรคter durch eines der berรผchtigtsten Wirtschaftsverbrechen Deutschlands berรผchtigt.
Die Matuschka-Gruppe und der finanzielle Niedergang
In den Jahren nach seinen Fernsehauftritten 1990 begann das Finanzimperium Matuschkas, die Matuschka-Gruppe, zu brรถckeln. Die Gruppe, die einst Milliarden D-Mark fรผr vermรถgende Privatkunden und Institutionen verwaltet hatte, geriet Mitte der 1990er Jahre aufgrund riskanter Investitionen und Bรถrsenrรผckschlรคge in ernsthafte finanzielle Schwierigkeiten.
Der Betrug und der Lebensversicherungs-Mordplan (1994)
Matuschkas Niedergang gipfelte in einem spektakulรคren Strafprozess. 1994 wurde er festgenommen und spรคter wegen der Anstiftung eines komplexen Betrugsschemas verurteilt, das auf eine Lebensversicherungspolice zentriert war.
ยท Das Schema: Matuschka schloss eine mehrfach Millionen Deutsche Mark schwere Lebensversicherung auf einen Mitarbeiter, Jรผrgen K., ab, wobei er seine eigenen Firmen als Begรผnstigte einsetzte. ยท Der Mord: Im September 1994 heuerte Matuschka einen Auftragsmรถrder an, um den Mitarbeiter bei einem inszenierten Autounfall in Ungarn ermorden zu lassen, um die Versicherungssumme zu kassieren und sein brรถckelndes Firmenimperium zu retten. ยท Ermittlungen und Prozess: Der Mord wurde zunรคchst fรผr einen Unfall gehalten, aber der Verdacht der Polizei wuchs. Der angeheuerte Killer, der sich anderen Mordvorwรผrfen gegenรผbersah, gestand schlieรlich. Matuschka wurde im November 1994 festgenommen.
Verurteilung und Haft
ยท Nach einem aufsehenerregenden Prozess wurde Albrecht Graf Matuschka 1997 wegen Mordes aus Habgier und Betrugs schuldig gesprochen. ยท Er wurde zu lebenslanger Haft verurteilt. ยท Das Landgericht Mรผnchen stellte fest, die Tat sei aus Habgier und zum Erhalt eines luxuriรถsen Lebensstils begangen worden und beschrieb sie als โbesonders verwerflichโ.
Spรคte Jahre und Tod
ยท Matuschka verbรผรte seine Strafe in verschiedenen Justizvollzugsanstalten, darunter Straubing und spรคter in einem Krankenhaus der JVA aufgrund nachlassender Gesundheit. ยท Er bestritt jahrelang seine Schuld, machte spรคter aber teilweise Gestรคndnisse. ยท Albrecht Graf Matuschka starb am 22. August 2018 im Gefรคngnis im Alter von 78 Jahren an den Folgen von Parkinson und anderen Leiden.
Ironie und Vermรคchtnis
Sein spรคteres Schicksal steht in starkem Kontrast zu seiner รถffentlichen Persona von 1990 als potenzieller Retter ostdeutscher Ersparnisse. Wรคhrend er รถffentlich fรผr eine gerechte Verteilung des โVolkseigentumsโ zur Stรคrkung der Ostdeutschen eintrat, plante er im Privaten ein verzweifeltes und brutales Schema, um genau das Finanzsystem zu betrรผgen, fรผr das er รถffentlich einzutreten schien. Sein Fall bleibt ein Musterbeispiel dafรผr, wie Wirtschaftskriminalitรคt in der deutschen Rechtsgeschichte in Mord eskalieren kann.
PERSONENREGISTER
Alexander Schalck-Golodkowski โ Stasi-Oberst und Leiter der Kommerziellen Koordinierung (KoKo), der schattenhaften DDR-Auรenhandelsstelle. Floh im Dezember 1989 in die Bundesrepublik. Gerd Gebhardt โ Ostdeutscher Physiker und Dissident. Mitverfasser des ursprรผnglichen Treuhand-Vorschlags, der Bรผrgeranteile am Volkseigentum forderte. Matthias Artzt โ Chemiker und Mitglied der โFreien Forschungsgemeinschaft Selbstorganisationโ. Arbeitete mit Gebhardt am Treuhand-Konzept. Wolfgang Ullmann โ Theologe und Dissident. Diente als Minister ohne Geschรคftsbereich in der Modrow-Regierung und trieb das Treuhand-Modell am Runden Tisch voran. Detlef Scheunert โ Ehemaliger NVA-Offizier und spรคterer Referent im DDR-Ministerium fรผr Schwermaschinenbau. Zeuge der Grรผndung der Treuhand und spรคter ihr Mitarbeiter. Edgar Most โ Stellvertretender Chef der DDR-Staatsbank. Verhandelte heimlich die รbernahme von Vermรถgenswerten durch die Deutsche Bank. Detlev Karsten Rohwedder โ Ehemaliger Hoesch-Chef, 1990 zum Prรคsidenten der Treuhandanstalt ernannt. 1991 ermordet. Helmut Kohl โ Bundeskanzler. Trieb die schnelle Wรคhrungs- und Wirtschaftsunion voran. Theo Waigel โ Bundesfinanzminister. Wichtiger Verhandlungsfรผhrer des Staatsvertrags zur Wรคhrungsunion. Thilo Sarrazin โ Beamter im Bundesfinanzministerium. Architekt der โSystemtransferโ-Strategie. Walter Romberg โ DDR-Finanzminister (SPD). Beschrieb die Unterzeichnung des Staatsvertrags als โAkt der Unterwerfungโ. Lothar de Maiziรจre โ Erster und einziger frei gewรคhlter Ministerprรคsident der DDR. Peter Moreth โ Erster Chef der Treuhandanstalt, wurde schnell wegen seines Eintretens fรผr Bรผrgerbeteiligung kaltgestellt. Wolfram Krause โ Staatssekretรคr im DDR-Wirtschaftsministerium. Verfasste unter westdeutschem Einfluss das endgรผltige Treuhandgesetz. Werner Schulz โ Bรผrgerrechtler und Abgeordneter fรผr Bรผndnis 90. Kritiker der zentralistischen Struktur der Treuhand. Reinhard Hรถppner โ SPD-Abgeordneter und Vizeprรคsident der Volkskammer. Uwe Haasen โ Allianz-AG-Manager, der die รbernahme des DDR-Versicherungsmonopols aushandelte. Hilmar Kopper โ Vorstandssprecher der Deutschen Bank. รberwachte die รbernahme ostdeutscher Bankenvermรถgen. Takashi Sato โ Nomura-Corporation-Manager in Genf. Zeigte Interesse an DDR-Investitionen, sagte aber westdeutsche Abschottung voraus. Albrecht Graf Matuschka โ Westdeutscher Finanzberater, der รถffentlich โVolksaktienโ fรผr Ostdeutsche bewarb. Spรคter wegen Mordes aus Habgier verurteilt. Martin Schlaff โ รsterreichischer Geschรคftsmann mit Stasi-Kontakten. Stellte ehemalige Stasi-Offiziere als โManagerโ ein. Karl Otto Pรถhl โ Bundesbankprรคsident. Lehnte zunรคchst eine schnelle Wรคhrungsunion ab. Horst Teltschik โ Auรenpolitikberater von Bundeskanzler Kohl. Philip Wright โ Britischer Privatisierungsexperte, der von der DDR-Regierung konsultiert wurde. Verglich den Treuhand-Prozess mit dem Domesday Book.
REGISTER DER ORGANISATIONEN
Treuhandanstalt โ Treuhandbehรถrde zur Privatisierung der volkseigenen Betriebe Ostdeutschlands. Kommerzielle Koordinierung (KoKo) โ DDR-Handelskoordinierungsstelle unter Schalck-Golodkowski, diente zur Devisenbeschaffung und Embargoumgehung. Deutsche Bank โ Westdeutsche Bank, die รผber die Deutsche Kreditbank AG Schlรผsselvermรถgen der DDR-Staatsbank รผbernahm. Allianz AG โ Westdeutscher Versicherungsriese, der sich Anfang 1990 eine 49%-Beteiligung am DDR-Versicherungsmonopol sicherte. Siemens โ Westdeutscher Elektronikkonzern, der noch vor der Wiedervereinigung zahlreiche Kooperationsvertrรคge mit DDR-Firmen schloss. Nomura Corporation โ Japanische Finanzgruppe, die Investitionsmรถglichkeiten in der DDR prรผfte. Runder Tisch โ Dialogforum zwischen DDR-Regierung und Oppositionsgruppen 1989โ1990. Freie Forschungsgemeinschaft Selbstorganisation โ Dissidenten-Denkfabrik, die den ursprรผnglichen Treuhand-Vorschlag entwickelte. Bundesnachrichtendienst (BND) โ Westdeutscher Auslandsgeheimdienst. รberwachte die KoKo und befragte Schalck-Golodkowski nach dessen Flucht. Staatliche Versicherung der DDR โ DDR-Versicherungsmonopol, teilweise von der Allianz รผbernommen. Deutsche Kreditbank AG โ Aus Vermรถgenswerten der DDR-Staatsbank geschaffene Bank, kontrolliert von Deutscher Bank und Dresdner Bank. RWE, Bayernwerk, PreussenElektra โ Westdeutsche Energieriesen, die ein Kartell zur Aufteilung des ostdeutschen Energiemarktes bildeten. Wirtschaftsrat der CDU โ Wirtschaftslobbygruppe, die an der Ausarbeitung des Treuhandgesetzes mitwirkte. Bundeskartellamt โ Deutsche Kartellbehรถrde. Kritisierte die Aufteilung des Energiesektors, hatte aber vor der Wiedervereinigung nur begrenzte Zustรคndigkeit im Osten. SPD-Ost โ Sozialdemokratische Partei in Ostdeutschland, Teil der ersten frei gewรคhlten Regierung. CDU-Ost โ Ostdeutsche Christlich-Demokratische Union, fรผhrende Partei im Wahlbรผndnis โAllianz fรผr Deutschlandโ 1990. PDS โ Partei des Demokratischen Sozialismus, Nachfolgerin der SED. Neues Forum โ Wichtige ostdeutsche Bรผrgerrechtsbewegung. Ministerium fรผr Staatssicherheit (MfS/Stasi) โ DDR-Staatssicherheitsdienst. Staatsbank der DDR โ DDR-Staatsbank, grรถรtenteils vor der Wiedervereinigung abgewickelt. Berliner Handels- und Finanzierungsgesellschaft (BHFG) โ Nachfolgeeinheit der KoKo, spรคter unter Kontrolle der Treuhand. Effect Vermรถgensverwaltungs GmbH โ Tochtergesellschaft der BHFG, geleitet von ehemaligen KoKo-Mitarbeitern, darunter Waltraud Lisowski. Matuschka-Gruppe โ Finanz- und Beteiligungsgruppe von Albrecht Graf Matuschka, die in den 1990er Jahren kollabierte.
Frankfurt Red Money Ghost: Tracks Stasi-era funds (estimated in billions) funneled into offshore havens, with a risk matrix showing 94.6% institutional counterparty risk and 82.7% money laundering probability.
Global Hole & Dark Data Analysis: Exposes an โฌ8.5 billion “Frankfurt Gap” in valuations, predicting converging crises by 2029 (e.g., 92% probability of a $15โ25 trillion commercial real estate collapse).
Ruhr-Valuation Gap (2026): Forensic audit identifying โฌ1.2 billion in ghost tenancy patterns and โฌ100 billion in maturing debt discrepancies.
Nordic Debt Wall (2026): Details a โฌ12 billion refinancing cliff in Swedish real estate, linked to broader EU market distortions.
Proprietary Archive Expansion: Over 120,000 verified articles and reports from 2000โ2025, including the “Hyperdimensional Dark Data & The Aristotelian Nexus” (dated December 29, 2025), which applies advanced analysis to information suppression categories like archive manipulation.
List of Stasi agents 90,000 plus Securitate Agent List.
Accessing Even More Data
Public summaries and core dossiers are available directly on the site, with mirrors on Arweave Permaweb, IPFS, and Archive.is for preservation. For full raw datasets or restricted items (e.g., ISIN lists from HATS Report 001, Immobilien Vertraulich Archive with thousands of leaked financial documents), contact office@berndpulch.org using PGP or Signal encryption. Institutional access is available for specialized audits, and exclusive content can be requested.
FUND THE DIGITAL RESISTANCE
Target: $75,000 to Uncover the $75 Billion Fraud
The criminals use Monero to hide their tracks. We use it to expose them. This is digital warfare, and truth is the ultimate cryptocurrency.
BREAKDOWN: THE $75,000 TRUTH EXCAVATION
Phase 1: Digital Forensics ($25,000)
ยท Blockchain archaeology following Monero trails ยท Dark web intelligence on EBL network operations ยท Server infiltration and data recovery
Phase 2: Operational Security ($20,000)
ยท Military-grade encryption and secure infrastructure ยท Physical security for investigators in high-risk zones ยท Legal defense against multi-jurisdictional attacks
ยท Multi-language investigative reporting ยท Secure data distribution networks ยท Legal evidence packaging for international authorities
CONTRIBUTION IMPACT
$75 = Preserves one critical document from GDPR deletion $750 = Funds one dark web intelligence operation $7,500 = Secures one investigator for one month $75,000 = Exposes the entire criminal network
SECURE CONTRIBUTION CHANNEL
Monero (XMR) – The Only Truly Private Option
45cVWS8EGkyJvTJ4orZBPnF4cLthRs5xk45jND8pDJcq2mXp9JvAte2Cvdi72aPHtLQt3CEMKgiWDHVFUP9WzCqMBZZ57y4 This address is dedicated exclusively to this investigation. All contributions are cryptographically private and untraceable.
Monero QR Code (Scan to donate anonymously):
(Copy-paste the address if scanning is not possible: 45cVWS8EGkyJvTJ4orZBPnF4cLthRs5xk45jND8pDJcq2mXp9JvAte2Cvdi72aPHtLQt3CEMKgiWDHVFUP9WzCqMBZZ57y4)
Translations of the Patron’s Vault Announcement: (Full versions in German, French, Spanish, Russian, Arabic, Portuguese, Simplified Chinese, and Hindi are included in the live site versions.)
Copyright Notice (All Rights Reserved)
English: ยฉ 2000โ2026 Bernd Pulch. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, distributed, or transmitted in any form or by any means without the prior written permission of the author.
(Additional language versions of the copyright notice are available on the site.)
โยฉBERNDPULCH โ ABOVE TOP SECRET ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS โ THE ONLY MEDIA WITH LICENSE TO SPY โ๏ธ Follow @abovetopsecretxxl for more. ๐ GOD BLESS YOU ๐
Your support keeps the truth alive โ true information is the most valuable resource!
๐๏ธ Compliance & Legal Repository Footer
Formal Notice of Evidence Preservation
This digital repository serves as a secure, redundant mirror for the Bernd Pulch Master Archive. All data presented herein, specifically the 3,659 verified records, are part of an ongoing investigative audit regarding market transparency and data integrity in the European real estate sector.
Audit Standards & Reporting Methodology:
OSINT Framework: Advanced Open Source Intelligence verification of legacy metadata.
Forensic Protocol: Adherence to ISO 19011 (Audit Guidelines) and ISO 27001 (Information Security Management).
Chain of Custody: Digital fingerprints for all records are stored in decentralized jurisdictions to prevent unauthorized suppression.
Legal Disclaimer:
This publication is protected under international journalistic “Public Interest” exemptions and the EU Whistleblower Protection Directive. Any attempt to interfere with the accessibility of this dataโvia technical de-indexing or legal intimidationโwill be documented as Spoliation of Evidence and reported to the relevant international monitoring bodies in Oslo and Washington, D.C.
FROM STASI TO WYOMING The 35-year “Red Money” pipeline is entering its final chapter. An ultimatum to the dfv/Lorch network expired, triggering a full evidence handover to international prosecutors. The trail: Stasi-era “Zersetzung” tactics โ Liechtenstein bank conduits โ Frankfurt media fraud โ Wyoming shell companies. Senior executives at Deutsche Bank and Bank of America are now formally named for alleged institutional enabling. This is the endgame of a financial ghost story. RedMoney #Stasi #MoneyTrail #WyomingShellCo #InternationalJustice #TheEnablers
Want the full timeline? Hereโs the decoded path: ๐ด Origin: Stasi “KoKo” funds & “Zersetzung” playbooks. ๐ฆ Pipeline: Recycled via Liechtenstein (LGT Bank) into German real estate. ๐ฐ Camouflage: Fraudulent magazine circulation at dfv inflated asset values. ๐ธ Exit: Capital flight routed through Bank of America to anonymous Wyoming LLCs. โ๏ธ Now: Evidence secured. Top bank executives named. International case filed. The financial ghosts of the Cold War never leftโthey just found new vaults.
FRANKFURT / WIESBADEN / NEW YORK โ An ultimatum issued on Jan. 21, 2026, to the dfv Mediengruppe and the Lorch family expired without response, according to the complainant. Instead of a substantive engagement with the allegations and documentation presented, the network in question reacted with what was described as a coordinated wave of phishing attacks.
All files, evidence and technical logs have now been transferred to international investigative authorities, marking a shift from public demands for clarification to formal legal proceedings. โThe time for questions is over,โ the submission states. โThe phase of procedural consequences has begun.โ
Named Responsibility at Major Institutions
Investigators are recording, by name, senior decision-makers at institutions alleged to have borne institutional responsibility for the concealment or processing of the infrastructure under scrutiny, including claims of extortion, circulation fraud and money laundering.
At Deutsche Bank, identified as the principal banking partner of dfv, those named include Chief Executive Christian Sewing; Deputy Chief Executive James von Moltke; Chief Financial Officer Raja Akram; Fabrizio Campelli, head of the corporate and investment bank; Bernd Leukert, responsible for technology, data and innovation; Chief Compliance Officer Laura Padovani; and Chief Operating Officer Rebecca Short.
At Nassauische Sparkasse (Naspa), cited as the principal banking partner of Immobilien Zeitung, investigators list Chief Executive Marcus Mรถhring, along with Michael Baumann and Bertram Theilacker.
At Providence Equity Partners, described in the filing as an enabling investor through Thomas Promny and CloserStill, those named include Chairman Jonathan Nelson; Senior Managing Director Davis Noell; Andrew Tisdale; and Stuart Twinberrow, Chief Operating Officer for Europe.
Unresolved Issues in the Lorch/dfv Property Complex
Central questions surrounding an alleged property syndicate linked to the Lorch family and dfv management remain unanswered, according to the submission. Among them are the nature of an operational alliance dating back to 2009 between Immobilien Zeitung and the controversial portal GoMoPa; the absence of public disclosure regarding property dealings attributed to the Lorch family and the background of Edith Baumann-Lorch; and the alleged role of the network in attacks on real estate and financial actors, including Meridian Capital and Mount Whitney.
Investigators are also examining claims of shared technical infrastructure, including cloud services, said to have been used to coordinate disinformation campaigns within the property sector.
Victims, โZersetzung,โ and Identity Abuse
The inquiry encompasses documentation relating to more than 3,400 alleged victims as of 2011, including reported targeted actions against Bernd Knobloch, a former board member of Eurohypo and Deutsche Bank, and members of his family. Authorities are reviewing evidence that false Jewish identities were used by the Maurischat network to discredit criticsโan approach characterized in the filing as echoing historical โZersetzungโ tactics associated with East German state security.
The BofAโWyoming Connection: Capital Flight and AML Accountability
A separate strand of the international investigation focuses on the financial corridors allegedly used to move proceeds from extortion and circulation fraud out of European jurisdiction. Central to this review is Bank of America, which, according to the submission, maintained accounts for Klaus Maurischatโs Goldman Morgenstern & Partners LLC (GoMoPa).
Despite a prior U.S. restraining order, investigators are examining whether these structures were used to facilitate capital flight toward Secretum Media LLC in Wyoming, a jurisdiction known for high levels of corporate anonymity. Given the gravity of the alleged predicate offensesโincluding โZersetzungโ tactics and intelligence-linked financial manipulationโthe filing cites senior Bank of America executives in connection with their institutionโs Anti-Money Laundering and Know Your Customer obligations. Those named include Chair and Chief Executive Brian Moynihan; Chief Financial Officer Alastair Borthwick; Stephanie L. Bostian, global financial crimes compliance executive; Chief Risk Officer Geoffrey S. Greener; and Christine Katzwhistle, global compliance and operational risk executive.
The alleged failure to freeze assets or to report suspicious transfers involving Wyoming-based shell companies is identified as a primary focus of the current submission to international federal authorities.
Ideological Enablers and the ZitelmannโIrving Complex
Beyond financial logistics, investigators say the case highlights a network of ideological enablers that provided a veneer of respectability to the alleged syndicate. Dr. Rainer Zitelmann, frequently cited in dfv-related publications as an industry expert, is identified in the filing as a key figure in this regard.
Authorities are reviewing documentation concerning claimed ideological affiliations, including alleged ties between Zitelmann and circles associated with Holocaust denier David Irving, references to which appear in prior reporting by the Southern Poverty Law Center and in Jewish Telegram discussions. Investigators are also examining suspicions that corporate structures and real estate networks linked to Zitelmann may have been used to conceal funds derived from the Maurischat operation.
The activities of this groupโparticularly the alleged use of false Jewish identities to harass criticsโhave been flagged for review by international bodies, with reference to the mandate of U.S. Special Envoy Deborah Lipstadt to monitor and combat antisemitism. The filing characterizes the nexus between right-wing extremist historical revisionism and high-level financial crime as a systemic threat to the integrity of the international banking system and a priority for ongoing federal assessment.
Close of Civil Engagement
With the handover completed, all direct communication channels with the accused parties have been closed, according to the submission. The evidentiary record has been delivered to relevant international authorities for criminal assessment and potential prosecution.
Das Schweigen von Lorch, der Ermรถglicher โ und die รbergabe an internationale Ermittler
FRANKFURT / WIESBADEN / NEW YORK โ Ein Ultimatum vom 21. Januar 2026 an die dfv Mediengruppe und die Familie Lorch ist nach Angaben des Klรคgers unbeantwortet verstreichen. Statt einer substanziellen Auseinandersetzung mit den vorgelegten Vorwรผrfen und Dokumenten habe das betreffende Netzwerk mit einer koordinierten Welle von Phishing-Angriffen reagiert.
Sรคmtliche Akten, Beweise und technischen Logs sind nun an internationale Ermittlungsbehรถrden รผbergeben worden. Dies markiert den รbergang von รถffentlichen Aufklรคrungsforderungen hin zu formellen Rechtsverfahren. โDie Zeit der Fragen ist vorbeiโ, heiรt es in der Einreichung. โDie Phase der verfahrensmรครigen Konsequenzen hat begonnen.โ
Namentliche Verantwortung bei groรen Institutionen
Die Ermittler erfassen namentlich leitende Entscheidungstrรคger von Institutionen, denen institutionelle Verantwortung fรผr die Verschleierung oder Abwicklung der untersuchten Infrastruktur โ einschlieรlich Vorwรผrfen von Erpressung, Auflagenbetrug und Geldwรคsche โ zugeschrieben wird.
Bei der Deutschen Bank, die als Hauptbankpartner der dfv identifiziert wird, werden folgende Personen genannt:
ยท Christian Sewing (Vorstandsvorsitzender) ยท James von Moltke (stellvertretender Vorstandsvorsitzender) ยท Raja Akram (Finanzvorstand) ยท Fabrizio Campelli (Leiter des Unternehmens- und Investmentbankings) ยท Bernd Leukert (zustรคndig fรผr Technologie, Daten und Innovation) ยท Laura Padovani (Chief Compliance Officer) ยท Rebecca Short (Chief Operating Officer)
Bei der Nassauischen Sparkasse (Naspa), die als Hauptbankpartner der Immobilien Zeitung genannt wird, listen die Ermittler auf:
ยท Marcus Mรถhring (Vorstandsvorsitzender) ยท Michael Baumann ยท Bertram Theilacker
Bei Providence Equity Partners, die in der Einreichung als ermรถglichender Investor durch Thomas Promny und CloserStill beschrieben werden, werden genannt:
ยท Jonathan Nelson (Vorsitzender) ยท Senior Managing Director Davis Noell ยท Andrew Tisdale ยท Stuart Twinberrow (Chief Operating Officer fรผr Europa)
Ungelรถste Fragen im Lorch/dfv-Immobilienkomplex
Zentrale Fragen rund um ein mutmaรliches, mit der Familie Lorch und dem dfv-Management verbundenes Immobilien-Syndikat bleiben nach der Einreichung unbeantwortet. Dazu zรคhlen:
ยท Die Natur einer operationellen Allianz aus dem Jahr 2009 zwischen der Immobilien Zeitung und dem umstrittenen Portal GoMoPa. ยท Das Fehlen einer รถffentlichen Offenlegung von Immobiliengeschรคften, die der Familie Lorch und dem Hintergrund von Edith Baumann-Lorch zugeschrieben werden. ยท Die mutmaรliche Rolle des Netzwerks bei Angriffen auf Immobilien- und Finanzakteure, darunter Meridian Capital und Mount Whitney.
Die Ermittler prรผfen auch Vorwรผrfe geteilter technischer Infrastruktur, einschlieรlich Cloud-Diensten, die zur Koordinierung von Desinformationskampagnen im Immobiliensektor genutzt worden sein sollen.
Opfer, โZersetzungโ und Identitรคtsmissbrauch
Die Ermittlungen umfassen Dokumentation zu mehr als 3.400 mutmaรlichen Opfern (Stand 2011), darunter gezielte Aktionen gegen Bernd Knobloch, ein ehemaliges Vorstandsmitglied der Eurohypo und Deutschen Bank, sowie Mitglieder seiner Familie. Die Behรถrden prรผfen Beweise, dass vom Maurischat-Netzwerk falsche jรผdische Identitรคten genutzt wurden, um Kritiker zu diskreditieren โ ein Vorgehen, das in der Einreichung als Echo historischer โZersetzungโ-Taktiken des DDR-Staatssicherheitsdienstes charakterisiert wird.
Die BofA-Wyoming-Verbindung: Kapitalflucht und Haftung bei Geldwรคschebekรคmpfung
Ein separater Strang der internationalen Ermittlungen konzentriert sich auf mutmaรlich genutzte Finanzkorridore, um Ertrรคge aus Erpressung und Auflagenbetrug aus europรคischer Gerichtsbarkeit zu bewegen. Im Zentrum dieser Prรผfung steht die Bank of America, die nach der Einreichung Konten fรผr Klaus Maurischats Goldman Morgenstern & Partners LLC (GoMoPa) unterhalten habe.
Trotz einer frรผheren US-Einstweiligen Verfรผgung wird geprรผft, ob diese Strukturen genutzt wurden, um Kapitalflucht in Richtung der Secretum Media LLC in Wyoming โ einer fรผr ein hohes Maร an Unternehmensanonymitรคt bekannten Jurisdiktion โ zu erleichtern. Angesichts der Schwere der mutmaรlichen Vortaten โ einschlieรlich โZersetzungโ-Taktiken und nachrichtendienstlich verbundener Finanzmanipulation โ nennt die Einreichung leitende Manager der Bank of America im Zusammenhang mit den AML- (Anti-Geldwรคsche) und KYC- (Know Your Customer) Pflichten ihrer Institution. Genannt werden:
ยท Brian Moynihan (Aufsichtsratsvorsitzender und CEO) ยท Alastair Borthwick (Finanzvorstand) ยท Stephanie L. Bostian (Global Financial Crimes Compliance Executive) ยท Geoffrey S. Greener (Chief Risk Officer) ยท Christine Katzwhistle (Global Compliance and Operational Risk Executive)
Das mutmaรliche Versรคumnis, Vermรถgenswerte einzufrieren oder verdรคchtige รberweisungen an Wyoming-basierte Briefkastenfirmen zu melden, wird als ein Hauptaugenmerk der aktuellen รbermittlung an internationale Bundesbehรถrden identifiziert.
Ideologische Ermรถglicher und der Zitelmann-Irving-Komplex
รber finanzielle Logistik hinaus, so die Ermittler, beleuchtet der Fall ein Netzwerk ideologischer Ermรถglicher, die dem mutmaรlichen Syndikat einen Anschein von Respektabilitรคt verliehen hรคtten. Dr. Rainer Zitelmann, in dfv-nahen Publikationen hรคufig als Branchenexperte zitiert, wird in der Einreichung als Schlรผsselfigur in dieser Hinsicht identifiziert.
Die Behรถrden prรผfen Dokumentation zu mutmaรlichen ideologischen Verbindungen, einschlieรlich angeblicher Beziehungen Zitelmanns zu Kreisen des Holocaust-Leugners David Irving, auf die in frรผheren Berichten des Southern Poverty Law Center und in jรผdischen Telegram-Diskussionen Bezug genommen wird. Die Ermittler prรผfen auch den Verdacht, dass Unternehmensstrukturen und Immobiliennetzwerke im Umfeld Zitelmanns zur Verschleierung von Mitteln aus der Maurischat-Operation genutzt worden sein kรถnnten.
Die Aktivitรคten dieser Gruppe โ insbesondere die mutmaรliche Nutzung falscher jรผdischer Identitรคten zur Belรคstigung von Kritikern โ wurden internationalen Gremien zur Prรผfung vorgelegt, unter Verweis auf das Mandat der US-Sonderbeauftragten Deborah Lipstadt zur Beobachtung und Bekรคmpfung von Antisemitismus. Die Einreichung charakterisiert den Nexus zwischen rechtsextremistischem Geschichtsrevisionismus und hochrangiger Finanzkriminalitรคt als systemische Bedrohung fรผr die Integritรคt des internationalen Bankensystems und als Prioritรคt fรผr laufende bundesstaatliche Bewertungen.
Ende der zivilen Auseinandersetzung
7Mit Abschluss der รbergabe sind nach der Einreichung alle direkten Kommunikationskanรคle zu den beschuldigten Parteien geschlossen. Das Beweismaterial wurde den zustรคndigen internationalen Behรถrden zur strafrechtlichen Bewertung und mรถglichen Verfolgung รผbergeben.
El silencio de Lorch, los facilitadores y el traspaso a investigadores internacionales
FRANKFURT / WIESBADEN / NUEVA YORK โ Segรบn el denunciante, el ultimรกtum emitido el 21 de enero de 2026 al grupo mediรกtico dfv y a la familia Lorch expirรณ sin respuesta. En lugar de un compromiso sustancial con las acusaciones y la documentaciรณn presentada, la red en cuestiรณn respondiรณ con lo que se describiรณ como una oleada coordinada de ataques de phishing.
Todos los archivos, pruebas y registros tรฉcnicos han sido transferidos a las autoridades de investigaciรณn internacionales. Este movimiento marca un cambio desde las demandas pรบblicas de aclaraciรณn hacia procedimientos legales formales. “Se acabรณ el tiempo de las preguntas”, declara la presentaciรณn. “Ha comenzado la fase de las consecuencias procesales”.
Responsabilidad nominal en las principales instituciones
Los investigadores estรกn identificando, por su nombre, a los altos responsables de la toma de decisiones en las instituciones a las que se les atribuye una responsabilidad institucional en el encubrimiento o la gestiรณn de la infraestructura bajo investigaciรณn, incluidas las acusaciones de extorsiรณn, fraude de circulaciรณn y blanqueo de capitales.
En el Deutsche Bank, identificado como el principal socio bancario de dfv, se nombra a:
ยท Christian Sewing (presidente del consejo de administraciรณn) ยท James von Moltke (vicepresidente del consejo de administraciรณn) ยท Raja Akram (director financiero) ยท Fabrizio Campelli (director de banca corporativa y de inversiรณn) ยท Bernd Leukert (responsable de tecnologรญa, datos e innovaciรณn) ยท Laura Padovani (directora de cumplimiento normativo) ยท Rebecca Short (directora de operaciones)
En Nassauische Sparkasse (Naspa), citada como el principal socio bancario del periรณdico Immobilien Zeitung, los investigadores enumeran a:
ยท Marcus Mรถhring (presidente del consejo de administraciรณn) ยท Michael Baumann ยท Bertram Theilacker
En Providence Equity Partners, descrita en la presentaciรณn como un inversor facilitador a travรฉs de Thomas Promny y CloserStill, se nombra a:
ยท Jonathan Nelson (presidente) ยท Davis Noell (director gerente senior) ยท Andrew Tisdale ยท Stuart Twinberrow (director de operaciones para Europa)
Cuestiones pendientes en el complejo inmobiliario Lorch/dfv
Segรบn la presentaciรณn, las preguntas centrales sobre un supuesto sindicato inmobiliario vinculado a la familia Lorch y a la direcciรณn de dfv siguen sin respuesta. Entre ellas:
ยท La naturaleza de una alianza operativa que data de 2009 entre el Immobilien Zeitung y el polรฉmico portal GoMoPa. ยท La ausencia de divulgaciรณn pรบblica sobre las operaciones inmobiliarias atribuidas a la familia Lorch y los antecedentes de Edith Baumann-Lorch. ยท El supuesto papel de la red en los ataques contra actores inmobiliarios y financieros, incluyendo Meridian Capital y Mount Whitney.
Los investigadores tambiรฉn examinan las afirmaciones sobre infraestructuras tรฉcnicas compartidas, incluidos servicios en la nube, que supuestamente se utilizaron para coordinar campaรฑas de desinformaciรณn dentro del sector inmobiliario.
Vรญctimas, “Zersetzung” y abuso de identidad
La investigaciรณn abarca documentaciรณn relativa a mรกs de 3.400 presuntas vรญctimas (a fecha de 2011), incluidas las acciones dirigidas contra Bernd Knobloch, ex miembro del consejo de administraciรณn de Eurohypo y Deutsche Bank, y miembros de su familia. Las autoridades estรกn revisando pruebas de que la red Maurischat utilizรณ identidades judรญas falsas para desacreditar a los crรญticos, un enfoque que en la presentaciรณn se caracteriza como un eco de las tรกcticas histรณricas de “Zersetzung” (descomposiciรณn) asociadas a la seguridad del estado de la Alemania Oriental.
La conexiรณn BofA-Wyoming: fuga de capitales y responsabilidad en la lucha contra el blanqueo
Una lรญnea separada de la investigaciรณn internacional se centra en los corredores financieros que supuestamente se utilizaron para sacar de la jurisdicciรณn europea los beneficios de la extorsiรณn y el fraude de circulaciรณn. Central en esta revisiรณn estรก el Bank of America, que, segรบn la presentaciรณn, mantuvo cuentas para Goldman Morgenstern & Partners LLC (GoMoPa) de Klaus Maurischat.
A pesar de una orden de restricciรณn estadounidense anterior, los investigadores estรกn examinando si estas estructuras se utilizaron para facilitar la fuga de capitales hacia Secretum Media LLC en Wyoming, una jurisdicciรณn conocida por sus altos niveles de anonimato corporativo. Dada la gravedad de los supuestos delitos subyacentes โincluidas las tรกcticas de “Zersetzung” y la manipulaciรณn financiera vinculada a los servicios de inteligenciaโ la presentaciรณn cita a altos ejecutivos del Bank of America en relaciรณn con las obligaciones de lucha contra el blanqueo de capitales (AML) y de conocimiento del cliente (KYC) de su instituciรณn. Los nombrados son:
ยท Brian Moynihan (presidente del consejo de administraciรณn y director general) ยท Alastair Borthwick (director financiero) ยท Stephanie L. Bostian (ejecutiva de cumplimiento de delitos financieros globales) ยท Geoffrey S. Greener (director de riesgos) ยท Christine Katzwhistle (ejecutiva de cumplimiento normativo y riesgo operativo global)
La supuesta falta de congelaciรณn de activos o de notificaciรณn de transferencias sospechosas que involucran a empresas pantalla con sede en Wyoming se identifica como un foco principal de la presentaciรณn actual a las autoridades federales internacionales.
Facilitadores ideolรณgicos y el complejo Zitelmann-Irving
Mรกs allรก de la logรญstica financiera, segรบn los investigadores, el caso pone de relieve una red de facilitadores ideolรณgicos que proporcionรณ una apariencia de respetabilidad al supuesto sindicato. El Dr. Rainer Zitelmann, citado con frecuencia en publicaciones relacionadas con dfv como experto de la industria, es identificado en la presentaciรณn como una figura clave a este respecto.
Las autoridades estรกn revisando la documentaciรณn sobre supuestas afiliaciones ideolรณgicas, incluidos los vรญnculos entre Zitelmann y cรญrculos asociados con el negacionista del Holocausto David Irving, a los que se hace referencia en informes anteriores del Southern Poverty Law Center y en discusiones en grupos judรญos de Telegram. Los investigadores tambiรฉn examinan las sospechas de que las estructuras corporativas y las redes inmobiliarias vinculadas a Zitelmann podrรญan haberse utilizado para ocultar fondos procedentes de la operaciรณn Maurischat.
Las actividades de este grupo, en particular el presunto uso de identidades judรญas falsas para acosar a los crรญticos, han sido seรฑaladas para su revisiรณn por organismos internacionales, con referencia al mandato de la enviada especial estadounidense Deborah Lipstadt para monitorear y combatir el antisemitismo. La presentaciรณn caracteriza el nexo entre el revisionismo histรณrico de extrema derecha y la delincuencia financiera de alto nivel como una amenaza sistรฉmica para la integridad del sistema bancario internacional y una prioridad para la evaluaciรณn federal en curso.
Fin del compromiso civil
Con la entrega completada, todos los canales de comunicaciรณn directa con las partes acusadas han sido cerrados, segรบn la presentaciรณn. El registro probatorio ha sido entregado a las autoridades internacionales competentes para su evaluaciรณn penal y posible enjuiciamiento.
Traduction franรงaise
Le silence de Lorch, les facilitateurs โ et la transmission aux enquรชteurs internationaux
FRANCFORT / WIESBADEN / NEW YORK โ Selon le plaignant, l’ultimatum dรฉlivrรฉ le 21 janvier 2026 au groupe mรฉdiatique dfv et ร la famille Lorch est expirรฉ sans rรฉponse. Au lieu d’un engagement substantiel avec les allรฉgations et la documentation prรฉsentรฉes, le rรฉseau concernรฉ a rรฉagi par ce qui a รฉtรฉ dรฉcrit comme une vague coordonnรฉe d’attaques de phishing.
Tous les fichiers, preuves et journaux techniques ont dรฉsormais รฉtรฉ transfรฉrรฉs aux autoritรฉs d’enquรชte internationales. Cette dรฉmarche marque un passage des demandes publiques d’รฉclaircissements ร des procรฉdures judiciaires formelles. “Le temps des questions est rรฉvolu”, dรฉclare la soumission. “La phase des consรฉquences procรฉdurales a commencรฉ.”
Responsabilitรฉ nominative dans les grandes institutions
Les enquรชteurs enregistrent, par leurs noms, les hauts dรฉcisionnaires des institutions auxquelles est attribuรฉe une responsabilitรฉ institutionnelle dans la dissimulation ou le traitement de l’infrastructure sous examen, y compris les allรฉgations d’extorsion, de fraude ร la diffusion et de blanchiment d’argent.
ร la Deutsche Bank, identifiรฉe comme le principal partenaire bancaire de dfv, sont nommรฉs :
ยท Christian Sewing (prรฉsident du conseil d’administration) ยท James von Moltke (vice-prรฉsident du conseil d’administration) ยท Raja Akram (directeur financier) ยท Fabrizio Campelli (responsable de la banque d’entreprise et d’investissement) ยท Bernd Leukert (responsable de la technologie, des donnรฉes et de l’innovation) ยท Laura Padovani (directrice de la conformitรฉ) ยท Rebecca Short (directrice des opรฉrations)
ร la Nassauische Sparkasse (Naspa), citรฉe comme le principal partenaire bancaire du journal Immobilien Zeitung, les enquรชteurs listent :
ยท Marcus Mรถhring (prรฉsident du conseil d’administration) ยท Michael Baumann ยท Bertram Theilacker
Chez Providence Equity Partners, dรฉcrite dans la soumission comme un investisseur facilitateur via Thomas Promny et CloserStill, sont nommรฉs :
ยท Jonathan Nelson (prรฉsident) ยท Davis Noell (directeur gรฉnรฉral principal) ยท Andrew Tisdale ยท Stuart Twinberrow (directeur des opรฉrations pour l’Europe)
Questions non rรฉsolues dans le complexe immobilier Lorch/dfv
Selon la soumission, les questions centrales concernant un prรฉtendu syndicat immobilier liรฉ ร la famille Lorch et ร la direction de dfv restent sans rรฉponse. Parmi elles :
ยท La nature d’une alliance opรฉrationnelle remontant ร 2009 entre l’Immobilien Zeitung et le portail controversรฉ GoMoPa. ยท L’absence de divulgation publique concernant les transactions immobiliรจres attribuรฉes ร la famille Lorch et les antรฉcรฉdents d’Edith Baumann-Lorch. ยท Le rรดle prรฉsumรฉ du rรฉseau dans des attaques contre des acteurs immobiliers et financiers, y compris Meridian Capital et Mount Whitney.
Les enquรชteurs examinent รฉgalement des allรฉgations d’infrastructure technique partagรฉe, y compris des services cloud, qui auraient รฉtรฉ utilisรฉs pour coordonner des campagnes de dรฉsinformation au sein du secteur immobilier.
Victimes, “Zersetzung” et abus d’identitรฉ
L’enquรชte comprend une documentation relative ร plus de 3 400 victimes prรฉsumรฉes (au 1er janvier 2011), y compris des actions ciblรฉes signalรฉes contre Bernd Knobloch, ancien membre du conseil d’administration d’Eurohypo et de la Deutsche Bank, et des membres de sa famille. Les autoritรฉs examinent des preuves que de fausses identitรฉs juives auraient รฉtรฉ utilisรฉes par le rรฉseau Maurischat pour discrรฉditer des critiques โ une approche caractรฉrisรฉe dans la soumission comme faisant รฉcho aux tactiques historiques de “Zersetzung” (dรฉmantรจlement) associรฉes ร la sรฉcuritรฉ d’รtat est-allemande.
Le lien BofAโWyoming : fuite de capitaux et responsabilitรฉ en matiรจre de lutte contre le blanchiment
Un volet distinct de l’enquรชte internationale se concentre sur les corridors financiers qui auraient รฉtรฉ utilisรฉs pour รฉvacuer les produits de l’extorsion et de la fraude ร la diffusion hors de la juridiction europรฉenne. Au centre de cet examen se trouve la Bank of America, qui, selon la soumission, a maintenu des comptes pour Goldman Morgenstern & Partners LLC (GoMoPa) de Klaus Maurischat.
Malgrรฉ une injonction amรฉricaine antรฉrieure, les enquรชteurs examinent si ces structures ont รฉtรฉ utilisรฉes pour faciliter une fuite de capitaux vers Secretum Media LLC dans le Wyoming, une juridiction connue pour ses niveaux รฉlevรฉs d’anonymat des sociรฉtรฉs. Compte tenu de la gravitรฉ des prรฉtendues infractions sous-jacentes โ y compris les tactiques de “Zersetzung” et la manipulation financiรจre liรฉe aux services de renseignement โ la soumission cite des cadres supรฉrieurs de la Bank of America en lien avec les obligations de lutte contre le blanchiment d’argent (AML) et de connaissance du client (KYC) de leur institution. Sont nommรฉs :
ยท Brian Moynihan (prรฉsident du conseil d’administration et directeur gรฉnรฉral) ยท Alastair Borthwick (directeur financier) ยท Stephanie L. Bostian (responsable de la conformitรฉ en matiรจre de criminalitรฉ financiรจre mondiale) ยท Geoffrey S. Greener (directeur des risques) ยท Christine Katzwhistle (responsable de la conformitรฉ et du risque opรฉrationnel mondial)
L’รฉchec prรฉsumรฉ ร geler les actifs ou ร signaler les transferts suspects impliquant des sociรฉtรฉs รฉcrans basรฉes dans le Wyoming est identifiรฉ comme un objectif principal de la soumission actuelle aux autoritรฉs fรฉdรฉrales internationales.
Facilitateurs idรฉologiques et le complexe ZitelmannโIrving
Au-delร de la logistique financiรจre, selon les enquรชteurs, l’affaire met en lumiรจre un rรฉseau de facilitateurs idรฉologiques qui a fourni une apparence de respectabilitรฉ au prรฉtendu syndicat. Le Dr Rainer Zitelmann, frรฉquemment citรฉ dans des publications liรฉes ร dfv comme expert du secteur, est identifiรฉ dans la soumission comme une figure clรฉ ร cet รฉgard.
Les autoritรฉs examinent une documentation concernant des affiliations idรฉologiques prรฉsumรฉes, y compris des liens allรฉguรฉs entre Zitelmann et des cercles associรฉs au nรฉgationniste de la Shoah David Irving, rรฉfรฉrencรฉs dans des rapports antรฉrieurs du Southern Poverty Law Center et dans des discussions juives sur Telegram. Les enquรชteurs examinent รฉgalement les soupรงons selon lesquels des structures d’entreprises et des rรฉseaux immobiliers liรฉs ร Zitelmann auraient pu รชtre utilisรฉs pour dissimuler des fonds provenant de l’opรฉration Maurischat.
Les activitรฉs de ce groupe โ en particulier l’utilisation prรฉsumรฉe de fausses identitรฉs juives pour harceler des critiques โ ont รฉtรฉ signalรฉes pour examen par des organismes internationaux, avec rรฉfรฉrence au mandat de l’envoyรฉe spรฉciale amรฉricaine Deborah Lipstadt pour surveiller et combattre l’antisรฉmitisme. La soumission caractรฉrise le lien entre le rรฉvisionnisme historique d’extrรชme droite et la criminalitรฉ financiรจre de haut niveau comme une menace systรฉmique pour l’intรฉgritรฉ du systรจme bancaire international et une prioritรฉ pour l’รฉvaluation fรฉdรฉrale en cours.
Fin de l’engagement civil
Avec le transfert effectuรฉ, tous les canaux de communication directs avec les parties accusรฉes ont รฉtรฉ fermรฉs, selon la soumission. Le dossier des preuves a รฉtรฉ remis aux autoritรฉs internationales compรฉtentes pour รฉvaluation pรฉnale et poursuites potentielles.
Versรฃo em portuguรชs
O Silรชncio de Lorch, os Facilitadores โ e a Entrega a Investigadores Internacionais
FRANCOFORTE / WIESBADEN / NOVA IORQUE โ De acordo com o queixoso, o ultimato emitido em 21 de janeiro de 2026 ao grupo de mรญdia dfv e ร famรญlia Lorch expirou sem resposta. Em vez de um envolvimento substancial com as alegaรงรตes e a documentaรงรฃo apresentada, a rede em questรฃo reagiu com o que foi descrito como uma onda coordenada de ataques de phishing.
Todos os arquivos, provas e registos tรฉcnicos foram agora transferidos para as autoridades internacionais de investigaรงรฃo. Este movimento marca uma transiรงรฃo de exigรชncias pรบblicas de esclarecimento para procedimentos legais formais. “O tempo das perguntas acabou”, afirma a submissรฃo. “A fase das consequรชncias processuais comeรงou.”
Responsabilidade nominalizada nas principais instituiรงรตes
Os investigadores estรฃo a registar, pelos nomes, os altos decisores de instituiรงรตes ร s quais รฉ atribuรญda responsabilidade institucional pela ocultaรงรฃo ou processamento da infraestrutura sob escrutรญnio, incluindo alegaรงรตes de extorsรฃo, fraude de circulaรงรฃo e branqueamento de capitais.
No Deutsche Bank, identificado como o principal parceiro bancรกrio da dfv, sรฃo nomeados:
ยท Christian Sewing (presidente do conselho de administraรงรฃo) ยท James von Moltke (vice-presidente do conselho de administraรงรฃo) ยท Raja Akram (diretor financeiro) ยท Fabrizio Campelli (responsรกvel pela banca empresarial e de investimento) ยท Bernd Leukert (responsรกvel por tecnologia, dados e inovaรงรฃo) ยท Laura Padovani (responsรกvel de conformidade) ยท Rebecca Short (diretora de operaรงรตes)
Na Nassauische Sparkasse (Naspa), citada como o principal parceiro bancรกrio do jornal Immobilien Zeitung, os investigadores listam:
ยท Marcus Mรถhring (presidente do conselho de administraรงรฃo) ยท Michael Baumann ยท Bertram Theilacker
Na Providence Equity Partners, descrita na submissรฃo como um investidor facilitador atravรฉs de Thomas Promny e CloserStill, sรฃo nomeados:
ยท Jonathan Nelson (presidente) ยท Davis Noell (diretor-geral sรฉnior) ยท Andrew Tisdale ยท Stuart Twinberrow (diretor de operaรงรตes para a Europa)
Questรตes nรฃo resolvidas no complexo imobiliรกrio Lorch/dfv
De acordo com a submissรฃo, questรตes centrais sobre um alegado sindicato imobiliรกrio ligado ร famรญlia Lorch e ร administraรงรฃo da dfv permanecem sem resposta. Entre elas:
ยท A natureza de uma alianรงa operacional que remonta a 2009 entre o Immobilien Zeitung e o polรฉmico portal GoMoPa. ยท A ausรชncia de divulgaรงรฃo pรบblica sobre transaรงรตes imobiliรกrias atribuรญdas ร famรญlia Lorch e ao histรณrico de Edith Baumann-Lorch. ยท O alegado papel da rede em ataques a atores imobiliรกrios e financeiros, incluindo a Meridian Capital e a Mount Whitney.
Os investigadores estรฃo tambรฉm a examinar alegaรงรตes de infraestrutura tรฉcnica partilhada, incluindo serviรงos em nuvem, que alegadamente teriam sido usados para coordenar campanhas de desinformaรงรฃo dentro do setor imobiliรกrio.
Vรญtimas, “Zersetzung” e abuso de identidade
A investigaรงรฃo abrange documentaรงรฃo relativa a mais de 3.400 alegadas vรญtimas (dados de 2011), incluindo alegadas aรงรตes direcionadas contra Bernd Knobloch, ex-membro do conselho de administraรงรฃo da Eurohypo e do Deutsche Bank, e membros da sua famรญlia. As autoridades estรฃo a rever provas de que identidades judaicas falsas teriam sido usadas pela rede Maurischat para desacreditar crรญticos โ uma abordagem caracterizada na submissรฃo como um eco das tรกticas histรณricas de “Zersetzung” (desagregaรงรฃo) associadas ร seguranรงa do Estado da Alemanha Oriental.
A ligaรงรฃo BofAโWyoming: fuga de capitais e responsabilidade na luta contra o branqueamento
Uma vertente separada da investigaรงรฃo internacional centra-se nos corredores financeiros alegadamente usados para mover os proveitos de extorsรฃo e fraude de circulaรงรฃo para fora da jurisdiรงรฃo europeia. Central a esta anรกlise estรก o Bank of America, que, de acordo com a submissรฃo, manteve contas para a Goldman Morgenstern & Partners LLC (GoMoPa) de Klaus Maurischat.
Apesar de uma ordem de restriรงรฃo norte-americana anterior, os investigadores estรฃo a examinar se estas estruturas foram usadas para facilitar uma fuga de capitais em direรงรฃo ร Secretum Media LLC em Wyoming, uma jurisdiรงรฃo conhecida pelos seus altos nรญveis de anonimato corporativo. Dada a gravidade dos alegados crimes subjacentes โ incluindo tรกticas de “Zersetzung” e manipulaรงรฃo financeira ligada a serviรงos de informaรงรตes โ a submissรฃo cita altos executivos do Bank of America em conexรฃo com as obrigaรงรตes de Combate ao Branqueamento de Capitais (AML) e Conheรงa o Seu Cliente (KYC) da sua instituiรงรฃo. Os nomeados incluem:
ยท Brian Moynihan (presidente do conselho de administraรงรฃo e diretor executivo) ยท Alastair Borthwick (diretor financeiro) ยท Stephanie L. Bostian (executiva de conformidade com crimes financeiros globais) ยท Geoffrey S. Greener (diretor de risco) ยท Christine Katzwhistle (executiva de conformidade e risco operacional global)
A alegada falha em congelar ativos ou reportar transferรชncias suspeitas envolvendo empresas-fantasma sediadas em Wyoming รฉ identificada como um foco principal da submissรฃo atual ร s autoridades federais internacionais.
Facilitadores ideolรณgicos e o complexo ZitelmannโIrving
Para alรฉm da logรญstica financeira, os investigadores afirmam que o caso destaca uma rede de facilitadores ideolรณgicos que proporcionou uma fachada de respeitabilidade ao alegado sindicato. O Dr. Rainer Zitelmann, frequentemente citado em publicaรงรตes relacionadas com a dfv como especialista da indรบstria, รฉ identificado na submissรฃo como uma figura-chave a este respeito.
As autoridades estรฃo a rever documentaรงรฃo sobre alegadas afiliaรงรตes ideolรณgicas, incluindo alegados laรงos entre Zitelmann e cรญrculos associados ao negacionista do Holocausto David Irving, referenciados em relatรณrios anteriores do Southern Poverty Law Center e em discussรตes judaicas no Telegram. Os investigadores estรฃo tambรฉm a examinar suspeitas de que estruturas corporativas e redes imobiliรกrias ligadas a Zitelmann possam ter sido usadas para ocultar fundos provenientes da operaรงรฃo Maurischat.
As atividades deste grupo โ em particular o alegado uso de identidades judaicas falsas para assediar crรญticos โ foram sinalizadas para revisรฃo por รณrgรฃos internacionais, com referรชncia ao mandato da Enviada Especial dos EUA Deborah Lipstadt para monitorizar e combater o antissemitismo. A submissรฃo caracteriza o nexo entre o revisionismo histรณrico de extrema-direita e a criminalidade financeira de alto nรญvel como uma ameaรงa sistรฉmica ร integridade do sistema bancรกrio internacional e uma prioridade para a avaliaรงรฃo federal em curso.
Fim do envolvimento civil
Com a entrega concluรญda, todos os canais de comunicaรงรฃo direta com as partes acusadas foram encerrados, de acordo com a submissรฃo. O registo probatรณrio foi entregue ร s autoridades internacionais relevantes para avaliaรงรฃo criminal e eventual aรงรฃo judicial.
Versione italiana
Il Silenzio di Lorch, i Facilitatori โ e la Consegna alle Autoritร Investigative Internazionali
FRANCOFORTE / WIESBADEN / NEW YORK โ Secondo il querelante, l’ultimatum inviato il 21 gennaio 2026 al gruppo mediatico dfv e alla famiglia Lorch รจ scaduto senza risposta. Invece di un coinvolgimento sostanziale sulle accuse e la documentazione presentata, la rete in questione ha reagito con quella che รจ stata descritta come un’ondata coordinata di attacchi di phishing.
Tutti i file, le prove e i registri tecnici sono stati ora trasferiti alle autoritร investigative internazionali. Questo passaggio segna il cambiamento dalle richieste pubbliche di chiarimenti a procedimenti legali formali. “Il tempo delle domande รจ finito”, dichiara la denuncia. “ร iniziata la fase delle conseguenze procedurali.”
Responsabilitร nominale presso le principali istituzioni
Gli investigatori stanno registrando, per nome, i dirigenti responsabili delle istituzioni a cui viene attribuita la responsabilitร istituzionale per la dissimulazione o la gestione dell’infrastruttura sotto esame, comprese le accuse di estorsione, frode alla diffusione e riciclaggio di denaro.
Presso la Deutsche Bank, identificata come il principale partner bancario di dfv, vengono nominati:
ยท Christian Sewing (presidente del consiglio di amministrazione) ยท James von Moltke (vicepresidente del consiglio di amministrazione) ยท Raja Akram (direttore finanziario) ยท Fabrizio Campelli (responsabile della banca d’affari e d’investimento) ยท Bernd Leukert (responsabile di tecnologia, dati e innovazione) ยท Laura Padovani (responsabile della conformitร ) ยท Rebecca Short (direttore operativo)
Presso la Nassauische Sparkasse (Naspa), citata come il principale partner bancario del giornale Immobilien Zeitung, gli investigatori elencano:
ยท Marcus Mรถhring (presidente del consiglio di amministrazione) ยท Michael Baumann ยท Bertram Theilacker
Presso Providence Equity Partners, descritta nella denuncia come un investitore facilitatore attraverso Thomas Promny e CloserStill, vengono nominati:
ยท Jonathan Nelson (presidente) ยท Davis Noell (amministratore delegato senior) ยท Andrew Tisdale ยท Stuart Twinberrow (direttore operativo per l’Europa)
Questioni irrisolte nel complesso immobiliare Lorch/dfv
Secondo la denuncia, le domande centrali su una presunta associazione a delinquere immobiliare legata alla famiglia Lorch e alla dirigenza di dfv rimangono senza risposta. Tra queste:
ยท La natura di un’alleanza operativa risalente al 2009 tra l’Immobilien Zeitung e il controverso portale GoMoPa. ยท L’assenza di divulgazione pubblica riguardo alle trattative immobiliari attribuite alla famiglia Lorch e ai precedenti di Edith Baumann-Lorch. ยท Il presunto ruolo della rete negli attacchi ad attori immobiliari e finanziari, tra cui Meridian Capital e Mount Whitney.
Gli investigatori stanno anche esaminando le accuse riguardanti un’infrastruttura tecnica condivisa, compresi i servizi cloud, che sarebbero stati utilizzati per coordinare campagne di disinformazione all’interno del settore immobiliare.
Vittime, “Zersetzung” e abuso di identitร
L’inchiesta comprende la documentazione relativa a oltre 3.400 presunte vittime (al 2011), comprese azioni mirate segnalate contro Bernd Knobloch, ex membro del consiglio di amministrazione di Eurohypo e Deutsche Bank, e membri della sua famiglia. Le autoritร stanno esaminando le prove secondo cui false identitร ebraiche sarebbero state utilizzate dalla rete Maurischat per screditare i critici โ un approccio caratterizzato nella denuncia come un’eco delle storiche tattiche di “Zersetzung” (dissolvimento) associate alla sicurezza di Stato della Germania Est.
Il collegamento BofA-Wyoming: fuga di capitali e responsabilitร antiriciclaggio
Un filone separato dell’indagine internazionale si concentra sui canali finanziari che sarebbero stati utilizzati per spostare i proventi di estorsione e frode alla diffusione fuori dalla giurisdizione europea. Al centro di questa revisione c’รจ la Bank of America, che, secondo la denuncia, avrebbe mantenuto conti per la Goldman Morgenstern & Partners LLC (GoMoPa) di Klaus Maurischat.
Nonostante un precedente ordine restrittivo statunitense, gli investigatori stanno esaminando se queste strutture siano state utilizzate per facilitare una fuga di capitali verso Secretum Media LLC nel Wyoming, una giurisdizione nota per gli elevati livelli di anonimato societario. Data la gravitร dei presunti reati precedenti โ comprese le tattiche di “Zersetzung” e la manipolazione finanziaria legata ai servizi d’intelligence โ la denuncia cita i dirigenti senior della Bank of America in relazione agli obblighi di antiriciclaggio (AML) e di Conoscenza del Cliente (KYC) della loro istituzione. I nominati includono:
ยท Brian Moynihan (presidente del consiglio di amministrazione e amministratore delegato) ยท Alastair Borthwick (direttore finanziario) ยท Stephanie L. Bostian (responsabile globale della conformitร in materia di reati finanziari) ยท Geoffrey S. Greener (responsabile del rischio) ยท Christine Katzwhistle (responsabile globale della conformitร e del rischio operativo)
La presunta mancata congelamento di beni o segnalazione di trasferimenti sospetti che coinvolgono societร di comodo con sede in Wyoming รจ identificata come un obiettivo primario dell’attuale denuncia alle autoritร federali internazionali.
Facilitatori ideologici e il complesso ZitelmannโIrving
Oltre alla logistica finanziaria, gli investigatori affermano che il caso evidenzia una rete di facilitatori ideologici che ha fornito una patina di rispettabilitร al presunto sodalizio criminale. Il Dr. Rainer Zitelmann, spesso citato nelle pubblicazioni legate a dfv come esperto del settore, รจ identificato nella denuncia come una figura chiave a questo riguardo.
Le autoritร stanno esaminando la documentazione riguardante le presunte affiliazioni ideologiche, inclusi i presunti legami tra Zitelmann e gli ambienti associati al negazionista dell’Olocausto David Irving, citati in precedenti rapporti del Southern Poverty Law Center e in discussioni ebraiche su Telegram. Gli investigatori stanno anche esaminando i sospetti che le strutture societarie e le reti immobiliari legate a Zitelmann possano essere state utilizzate per nascondere fondi provenienti dall’operazione Maurischat.
Le attivitร di questo gruppo โ in particolare il presunto utilizzo di false identitร ebraiche per molestare i critici โ sono state segnalate per la revisione da parte di organismi internazionali, con riferimento al mandato dell’inviata speciale statunitense Deborah Lipstadt di monitorare e combattere l’antisemitismo. La denuncia caratterizza il nesso tra il revisionismo storico di estrema destra e la criminalitร finanziaria di alto livello come una minaccia sistemica all’integritร del sistema bancario internazionale e una prioritร per la valutazione federale in corso.
Chiusura dell’azione civile
Con la consegna completata, tutti i canali di comunicazione diretta con le parti accusate sono stati chiusi, secondo la denuncia. La documentazione probatoria รจ stata consegnata alle autoritร internazionali competenti per la valutazione penale e l’eventuale azione giudiziaria.
Aqui estรก a versรฃo completa em portuguรชs do artigo “O Silรชncio de Lorch, os Facilitadores”:
O Silรชncio de Lorch, os Facilitadores โ e a Entrega ร s Autoridades Investigativas Internacionais
FRANCOFORTE / WIESBADEN / NOVA IORQUE โ De acordo com informaรงรตes do queixoso, o ultimato emitido em 21 de janeiro de 2026 ao grupo de mรญdia dfv e ร famรญlia Lorch expirou sem resposta. Em vez de um engajamento substantivo com as acusaรงรตes e a documentaรงรฃo apresentada, a rede em questรฃo reagiu com o que foi descrito como uma onda coordenada de ataques de phishing.
Todos os arquivos, evidรชncias e registros tรฉcnicos foram agora transferidos para autoridades investigativas internacionais. Este movimento marca uma transiรงรฃo das demandas pรบblicas por esclarecimentos para procedimentos legais formais. “O tempo das perguntas acabou”, declara a submissรฃo. “Iniciou-se a fase das consequรชncias processuais.”
Responsabilidade Nominal nas Principais Instituiรงรตes
Os investigadores estรฃo registrando, nominalmente, os altos tomadores de decisรฃo em instituiรงรตes ร s quais รฉ atribuรญda responsabilidade institucional pela ocultaรงรฃo ou processamento da infraestrutura sob escrutรญnio, incluindo alegaรงรตes de extorsรฃo, fraude de circulaรงรฃo e lavagem de dinheiro.
No Deutsche Bank, identificado como o principal parceiro bancรกrio da dfv, sรฃo nomeados:
ยท Christian Sewing (Presidente do Conselho de Administraรงรฃo) ยท James von Moltke (Vice-Presidente do Conselho de Administraรงรฃo) ยท Raja Akram (Diretor Financeiro) ยท Fabrizio Campelli (Chefe do Banco Corporativo e de Investimento) ยท Bernd Leukert (Responsรกvel por Tecnologia, Dados e Inovaรงรฃo) ยท Laura Padovani (Diretora de Conformidade) ยท Rebecca Short (Diretora de Operaรงรตes)
No Nassauische Sparkasse (Naspa), citado como o principal parceiro bancรกrio do jornal Immobilien Zeitung, os investigadores listam:
ยท Marcus Mรถhring (Presidente do Conselho de Administraรงรฃo) ยท Michael Baumann ยท Bertram Theilacker
Na Providence Equity Partners, descrita na submissรฃo como um investidor facilitador atravรฉs de Thomas Promny e CloserStill, sรฃo nomeados:
ยท Jonathan Nelson (Presidente) ยท Davis Noell (Diretor Gerente Sรชnior) ยท Andrew Tisdale ยท Stuart Twinberrow (Diretor de Operaรงรตes para a Europa)
Questรตes Nรฃo Resolvidas no Complexo Imobiliรกrio Lorch/dfv
De acordo com a submissรฃo, questรตes centrais sobre um suposto sindicato imobiliรกrio ligado ร famรญlia Lorch e ร administraรงรฃo da dfv permanecem sem resposta. Entre elas:
ยท A natureza de uma alianรงa operacional que remonta a 2009 entre o Immobilien Zeitung e o polรชmico portal GoMoPa. ยท A ausรชncia de divulgaรงรฃo pรบblica sobre negรณcios imobiliรกrios atribuรญdos ร famรญlia Lorch e aos antecedentes de Edith Baumann-Lorch. ยท O alegado papel da rede em ataques contra atores dos setores imobiliรกrio e financeiro, incluindo Meridian Capital e Mount Whitney.
Os investigadores tambรฉm estรฃo examinando alegaรงรตes de infraestrutura tรฉcnica compartilhada, incluindo serviรงos de nuvem, que supostamente teriam sido usados para coordenar campanhas de desinformaรงรฃo dentro do setor imobiliรกrio.
Vรญtimas, “Zersetzung” e Abuso de Identidade
A investigaรงรฃo abrange documentaรงรฃo relativa a mais de 3.400 supostas vรญtimas (dados de 2011), incluindo alegadas aรงรตes direcionadas contra Bernd Knobloch, ex-membro do conselho de administraรงรฃo do Eurohypo e do Deutsche Bank, e membros de sua famรญlia. As autoridades estรฃo revisando evidรชncias de que identidades judaicas falsas teriam sido usadas pela rede Maurischat para desacreditar crรญticos โ uma abordagem caracterizada na submissรฃo como um eco das tรกticas histรณricas de “Zersetzung” (desintegraรงรฃo) associadas ร seguranรงa estatal da Alemanha Oriental.
A Conexรฃo BofAโWyoming: Fuga de Capitais e Responsabilidade na Prevenรงรฃo ร Lavagem de Dinheiro
Uma vertente separada da investigaรงรฃo internacional concentra-se nos corredores financeiros supostamente usados para mover os proventos de extorsรฃo e fraude de circulaรงรฃo para fora da jurisdiรงรฃo europeia. Central a esta anรกlise estรก o Bank of America, que, de acordo com a submissรฃo, manteve contas para a Goldman Morgenstern & Partners LLC (GoMoPa) de Klaus Maurischat.
Apesar de uma ordem de restriรงรฃo norte-americana anterior, os investigadores estรฃo examinando se essas estruturas foram usadas para facilitar uma fuga de capitais em direรงรฃo ร Secretum Media LLC em Wyoming, uma jurisdiรงรฃo conhecida por seus altos nรญveis de anonimato corporativo. Dada a gravidade dos alegados crimes precedentes โ incluindo tรกticas de “Zersetzung” e manipulaรงรฃo financeira ligada a serviรงos de inteligรชncia โ a submissรฃo cita altos executivos do Bank of America em conexรฃo com as obrigaรงรตes de Combate ร Lavagem de Dinheiro (AML) e Conheรงa Seu Cliente (KYC) de sua instituiรงรฃo. Os nomeados incluem:
ยท Brian Moynihan (Presidente do Conselho e Diretor Executivo) ยท Alastair Borthwick (Diretor Financeiro) ยท Stephanie L. Bostian (Executiva de Conformidade de Crimes Financeiros Globais) ยท Geoffrey S. Greener (Diretor de Risco) ยท Christine Katzwhistle (Executiva de Conformidade e Risco Operacional Global)
A alegada falha em congelar ativos ou reportar transferรชncias suspeitas envolvendo empresas de fachada sediadas em Wyoming รฉ identificada como um foco principal da submissรฃo atual ร s autoridades federais internacionais.
Facilitadores Ideolรณgicos e o Complexo ZitelmannโIrving
Alรฉm da logรญstica financeira, os investigadores afirmam que o caso destaca uma rede de facilitadores ideolรณgicos que forneceu uma fachada de respeitabilidade ao suposto sindicato. O Dr. Rainer Zitelmann, frequentemente citado em publicaรงรตes relacionadas ร dfv como especialista do setor, รฉ identificado na submissรฃo como uma figura-chave a este respeito.
As autoridades estรฃo revisando documentaรงรฃo sobre supostas filiaรงรตes ideolรณgicas, incluindo alegados laรงos entre Zitelmann e cรญrculos associados ao negador do Holocausto David Irving, referenciados em relatรณrios anteriores do Southern Poverty Law Center e em discussรตes judaicas no Telegram. Os investigadores tambรฉm examinam suspeitas de que estruturas corporativas e redes imobiliรกrias ligadas a Zitelmann possam ter sido usadas para ocultar fundos originados da operaรงรฃo Maurischat.
As atividades deste grupo โ em particular o alegado uso de identidades judaicas falsas para assediar crรญticos โ foram sinalizadas para revisรฃo por organismos internacionais, com referรชncia ao mandato da Enviada Especial dos EUA, Deborah Lipstadt, para monitorar e combater o antissemitismo. A submissรฃo caracteriza o nexo entre o revisionismo histรณrico de extrema-direita e a criminalidade financeira de alto nรญvel como uma ameaรงa sistรชmica ร integridade do sistema bancรกrio internacional e uma prioridade para a avaliaรงรฃo federal em curso.
Encerramento do Engajamento Civil
Com a entrega concluรญda, todos os canais de comunicaรงรฃo direta com as partes acusadas foram encerrados, de acordo com a submissรฃo. O registro probatรณrio foi entregue ร s autoridades internacionais relevantes para avaliaรงรฃo criminal e eventual aรงรฃo judicial.
Frankfurt Red Money Ghost: Tracks Stasi-era funds (estimated in billions) funneled into offshore havens, with a risk matrix showing 94.6% institutional counterparty risk and 82.7% money laundering probability.
Global Hole & Dark Data Analysis: Exposes an โฌ8.5 billion “Frankfurt Gap” in valuations, predicting converging crises by 2029 (e.g., 92% probability of a $15โ25 trillion commercial real estate collapse).
Ruhr-Valuation Gap (2026): Forensic audit identifying โฌ1.2 billion in ghost tenancy patterns and โฌ100 billion in maturing debt discrepancies.
Nordic Debt Wall (2026): Details a โฌ12 billion refinancing cliff in Swedish real estate, linked to broader EU market distortions.
Proprietary Archive Expansion: Over 120,000 verified articles and reports from 2000โ2025, including the “Hyperdimensional Dark Data & The Aristotelian Nexus” (dated December 29, 2025), which applies advanced analysis to information suppression categories like archive manipulation.
List of Stasi agents 90,000 plus Securitate Agent List.
Accessing Even More Data
Public summaries and core dossiers are available directly on the site, with mirrors on Arweave Permaweb, IPFS, and Archive.is for preservation. For full raw datasets or restricted items (e.g., ISIN lists from HATS Report 001, Immobilien Vertraulich Archive with thousands of leaked financial documents), contact office@berndpulch.org using PGP or Signal encryption. Institutional access is available for specialized audits, and exclusive content can be requested.
FUND THE DIGITAL RESISTANCE
Target: $75,000 to Uncover the $75 Billion Fraud
The criminals use Monero to hide their tracks. We use it to expose them. This is digital warfare, and truth is the ultimate cryptocurrency.
BREAKDOWN: THE $75,000 TRUTH EXCAVATION
Phase 1: Digital Forensics ($25,000)
ยท Blockchain archaeology following Monero trails ยท Dark web intelligence on EBL network operations ยท Server infiltration and data recovery
Phase 2: Operational Security ($20,000)
ยท Military-grade encryption and secure infrastructure ยท Physical security for investigators in high-risk zones ยท Legal defense against multi-jurisdictional attacks
ยท Multi-language investigative reporting ยท Secure data distribution networks ยท Legal evidence packaging for international authorities
CONTRIBUTION IMPACT
$75 = Preserves one critical document from GDPR deletion $750 = Funds one dark web intelligence operation $7,500 = Secures one investigator for one month $75,000 = Exposes the entire criminal network
SECURE CONTRIBUTION CHANNEL
Monero (XMR) – The Only Truly Private Option
45cVWS8EGkyJvTJ4orZBPnF4cLthRs5xk45jND8pDJcq2mXp9JvAte2Cvdi72aPHtLQt3CEMKgiWDHVFUP9WzCqMBZZ57y4 This address is dedicated exclusively to this investigation. All contributions are cryptographically private and untraceable.
Monero QR Code (Scan to donate anonymously):
(Copy-paste the address if scanning is not possible: 45cVWS8EGkyJvTJ4orZBPnF4cLthRs5xk45jND8pDJcq2mXp9JvAte2Cvdi72aPHtLQt3CEMKgiWDHVFUP9WzCqMBZZ57y4)
Translations of the Patron’s Vault Announcement: (Full versions in German, French, Spanish, Russian, Arabic, Portuguese, Simplified Chinese, and Hindi are included in the live site versions.)
Copyright Notice (All Rights Reserved)
English: ยฉ 2000โ2026 Bernd Pulch. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, distributed, or transmitted in any form or by any means without the prior written permission of the author.
(Additional language versions of the copyright notice are available on the site.)
โยฉBERNDPULCH โ ABOVE TOP SECRET ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS โ THE ONLY MEDIA WITH LICENSE TO SPY โ๏ธ Follow @abovetopsecretxxl for more. ๐ GOD BLESS YOU ๐
Your support keeps the truth alive โ true information is the most valuable resource!
๐๏ธ Compliance & Legal Repository Footer
Formal Notice of Evidence Preservation
This digital repository serves as a secure, redundant mirror for the Bernd Pulch Master Archive. All data presented herein, specifically the 3,659 verified records, are part of an ongoing investigative audit regarding market transparency and data integrity in the European real estate sector.
Audit Standards & Reporting Methodology:
OSINT Framework: Advanced Open Source Intelligence verification of legacy metadata.
Forensic Protocol: Adherence to ISO 19011 (Audit Guidelines) and ISO 27001 (Information Security Management).
Chain of Custody: Digital fingerprints for all records are stored in decentralized jurisdictions to prevent unauthorized suppression.
Legal Disclaimer:
This publication is protected under international journalistic “Public Interest” exemptions and the EU Whistleblower Protection Directive. Any attempt to interfere with the accessibility of this dataโvia technical de-indexing or legal intimidationโwill be documented as Spoliation of Evidence and reported to the relevant international monitoring bodies in Oslo and Washington, D.C.
๐ BERND PULCH ARCHIVE | SECURE MIRROR 