The official Website of Bernd Pulch. Since 2009 providing critical insights and political Satire on lawfare, media control, and political reality. Avoid fake sites.
Since the fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989, Berlin has been a battleground for financial manipulation, real estate speculation, and media warfare. One of the most controversial players in this landscape was GoMoPa (Goldmann Morgenstern & Partners)โa self-styled financial intelligence platform that used fake Jewish identities, manipulated media narratives, and engaged in questionable real estate dealings.
However, GoMoPaโs operations extended far beyond finance. Its founders had deep connections to media outlets with Stasi ties, controversial digital subdomains, and even an infamous “Killer Bible” project allegedly designed for nefarious purposes.
Fake Identities and Real Estate Schemes
One of the key tactics used by GoMoPa was the deployment of fake Jewish identities to gain access to financial networks, real estate deals, and business communities. Berlin, having become a prime target for international property speculation, provided fertile ground for such activities.
GoMoPa allegedly used its investigative reports as leverage in real estate battles:
Destroying competitors through smear campaigns.
Boosting or sabotaging reputations depending on financial incentives.
Publishing misleading intelligence to manipulate investment flows.
GoMoPaโs influence reportedly extended into mainstream financial and real estate journalism, where connections to outlets like Immobilien Zeitung and Das Investment enabled it to further shape public narratives.
Berliner Zeitung: Stasi Allies and Media Manipulation
Another key media player in Berlinโs post-Wall transition was Berliner Zeitung, a newspaper with longstanding ties to former Stasi operatives.
After the Wall fell, ex-Stasi agents and informants sought to regain influence in media and politics.
Berliner Zeitung reportedly provided cover for operations linked to financial and political players aligned with the former East German elite.
Some reports suggest that GoMoPa and Berliner Zeitung had overlapping interests, using media as a tool for financial warfare.
This suggests that GoMoPa was not merely a rogue financial intelligence entityโit was part of a broader network with deep historical and political roots in Berlinโs intelligence community.
GoMoPa4Kids and the Alleged “Killer Bible” Toxdat
Among the most disturbing allegations tied to GoMoPa is its subdomain “GoMoPa4Kids” and its connection to a project known as “Toxdat”โthe so-called Killer Bible.
This aspect of the story leads to Ehrenfried Stelzer, a GoMoPa co-founder whose name has been linked to digital subprojects with highly controversial implications.
Toxdat was allegedly a manipulated version of the Bible designed to serve a dangerous agendaโthough its exact purpose remains clouded in secrecy.
Some sources suggest it was linked to psychological influence campaigns or even extremist ideological programming.
The GoMoPa4Kids subdomain remains a mystery, but its existence alongside these other projects raises serious questions about the true nature of GoMoPaโs operations.
If these allegations hold any truth, they paint a far darker picture of GoMoPa than just financial manipulationโit could have been involved in covert ideological and digital warfare projects.
Connections to Zitelmann, Financial Media, and Political Influence
GoMoPaโs reach extended beyond Berlin, with connections to influential figures in financial media and investment circles, such as Rainer Zitelmannโa well-known real estate mogul and media strategist.
Zitelmann has been associated with media outlets like Immobilien Zeitung and Das Investment, both of which had overlapping narratives with GoMoPa.
Some sources suggest that real estate wars in Berlin were fueled by strategic leaks and targeted smear campaigns originating from GoMoPa-linked sources.
The legal protections and influence networks shielding GoMoPa for years may have involved players in Berlinโs post-Stasi financial and media elite.
This web of connections suggests that GoMoPa was not an isolated actor, but part of a larger, more coordinated effort to manipulate Berlinโs financial and real estate sectors.
The Shutdown of GoMoPa.net and the Mystery of Secretum Media
As of February 7, 2025, GoMoPa.net remains inaccessible, having been down since at least October 9, 2024. (downforeveryoneorjustme.com)
However, the story doesnโt end there.
In 2022, GoMoPa transitioned its operations to GoMoPa.io, undergoing a visual overhaul and removing team information.
Shortly before legal actions were initiated against the company, GoMoPaโs website and assets were reportedly sold to Secretum Media, allegedly based in the Seychelles. (liien.com)
Yet, there is little publicly available information about who is behind Secretum Media.
No clear ownership records exist.
The true controllers of GoMoPaโs assets remain unknown.
The transition suggests an attempt to continue operations under a different name, possibly shielding key figures from legal consequences.
This raises a crucial question: Has GoMoPa really disappeared, or has it merely evolved under a new corporate identity?
The Fall of GoMoPaโBut Is Its Network Still Active?
Despite its controversial operations, GoMoPa eventually collapsed under legal and financial pressure. Increasing scrutiny, lawsuits, and exposure forced the platform to shut down.
However, key questions remain:
Did GoMoPaโs network simply shift to new platforms?
Are its operatives still active in Berlinโs financial, real estate, and media sectors?
Has its smear campaign and extortion model been replicated by other digital entities?
Berlinโs post-reunification era has seen many financial scandals, but few as shadowy and far-reaching as GoMoPa. Understanding its operations provides a case study in digital reputation warfare, financial intelligence abuse, and the blurred lines between investigative journalism and corporate extortion.
Conclusion: The Dark Legacy of GoMoPa and Its Media Allies
The story of GoMoPa is not just about financial intelligenceโitโs about the power of digital platforms to manipulate reality.
Fake identities enabled infiltration into real estate and financial circles.
Media manipulation through outlets like Berliner Zeitung and BerlinJournal.biz shaped public narratives.
Dark projects like “Toxdat” and GoMoPa4Kids suggest that GoMoPaโs ambitions extended beyond financeโpotentially into psychological warfare and ideological control.
The emergence of Secretum Media suggests that the network may still be operating under a different guise.
While GoMoPa may have disappeared, its tactics remain in play today. Anyone navigating Berlinโs financial, media, or real estate landscape should remain vigilant against similar digital influence operations.
Who really controls Secretum Media?
What legal actions were taken against GoMoPa before its shutdown?
Are former GoMoPa operatives still active under new platforms?
These could reveal the next evolution of financial and media warfare in Berlin.
Further Investigation into GoMoPa’s Transition and Secretum Media
GoMoPa’s Transition to GoMoPa.io
In 2022, GoMoPa transitioned its operations from gomopa.net to gomopa.io, undergoing a visual overhaul and removing team information. The website and associated assets were reportedly sold to Secretum Media, allegedly based in the Seychelles, shortly before legal actions were initiated against the company. ๎cite๎turn0search12๎
Secretum Media: Ownership and Operations
Information about Secretum Media is scarce. There is limited public data regarding its ownership, structure, or operations, making it challenging to ascertain who is currently behind GoMoPa’s activities. Notably, Secretum is also the name of a decentralized, encrypted messaging and OTC trading app built on the Solana blockchain, founded in 2021. ๎cite๎turn0search16๎ However, there is no confirmed connection between this app and GoMoPa or Secretum Media.
Conclusion
Given the lack of transparency surrounding Secretum Media, the true controllers of GoMoPa’s assets and operations remain unknown. The transition from gomopa.net to gomopa.io and the reported sale to Secretum Media suggest an attempt to continue operations under a different corporate identity, possibly shielding key figures from legal consequences. However, without concrete information, the current status and ownership of GoMoPa remain speculative.
An Insider revealed that the old Stasi network is still in control. The key operative figure is Sven Schmidt directed by intelligence figures around the Resch Stasi network (Toxdat/Ehrenfried Stelzer/KGB/FSB).
The Future of Intelligence: Why Exclusive Insights Matter More Than Ever
In an era where information is abundant but real intelligence is scarce, access to exclusive, high-quality analysis is crucial. Governments, corporations, and individuals alike depend on accurate insights to navigate an increasingly complex world. Thatโs where Above Top Secret XXL steps inโproviding unparalleled intelligence on technological advancements, security threats, and geopolitical developments.
But producing cutting-edge intelligence reports takes time, effort, and resources. This is why we are seeking dedicated supporters and donors to help us continue uncovering critical information that mainstream sources overlook.
Why Intelligence Matters Now More Than Ever
From AI-driven warfare to deepfake propaganda, from quantum computing breakthroughs to cyber espionage, technology is evolving at an unprecedented pace. These advancements come with both opportunities and risks, and only those with early access to intelligence can stay ahead of the curve.
For example:
Governments are racing to develop and regulate AI-powered surveillance systems.
Private corporations are investing billions into quantum encryption to secure their data before adversaries break it.
Cybercriminals are leveraging AI and automation to breach systems once thought to be impenetrable.
The question is: Are you prepared for these changes?
Why Your Support Matters
Unlike mainstream media, which often recycles information or presents a filtered narrative, we go beyond the surface to uncover the real stories behind intelligence developments. Your donation directly fuels investigations into:
โ Breakthrough technologies with national security implications. โ Geopolitical intelligence that affects global power dynamics. โ Cybersecurity threats that could disrupt industries and economies. โ Declassified insights and insider reports unavailable to the public.
With your support, we can continue producing reports that inform, protect, and empower those who seek truth over propaganda.
How You Can Make a Difference
We offer multiple ways to support Above Top Secret XXL:
1. One-Time or Recurring Donations
Your contributions help us fund investigations, obtain classified insights, and expand our research team. Even a small donation can make a big difference.
2. Join Our Exclusive Patreon Community
Subscribers gain access to:
Early intelligence briefings
Exclusive full-length reports
Private discussions on emerging threats
Q&A sessions with intelligence analysts
3. Share and Spread the Word
If you canโt donate, you can still help by sharing our reports and articles with like-minded individuals who value real intelligence over media narratives.
Be Part of the Future of Intelligence
The world is changing faster than ever, and those who have access to timely, accurate intelligence will be the ones who thrive in uncertainty. By supporting Above Top Secret XXL, you are not just funding a platformโyou are investing in knowledge, security, and truth.
Take action todayโsupport independent intelligence and stay ahead of the curve.
“Unveiling Strategies Against Antisemitism: The State Department’s Commitment to the Trump Executive Order, Emphasizing the IHRA Definition and Global Advocacy.”
On January 2025, the White House issued an executive order titled “Additional Measures to Combat Anti-Semitism,” reinforcing the U.S. government’s commitment to addressing antisemitism, particularly in educational institutions. While the decree primarily focuses on domestic policy, its implications extend globally, reflecting the Biden administrationโs broader strategy to counter antisemitism worldwide.
The Global Importance of This Decree
Strengthening International Alliances The U.S. plays a key role in global diplomacy, and this decree signals a firm stance against antisemitism, encouraging other nations to implement similar policies. It strengthens partnerships with the European Union, Israel, and international organizations committed to combating hate speech and violence against Jewish communities.
Reinforcing Human Rights Norms By taking a strong federal approach to antisemitism, the U.S. reinforces international human rights standards, aligning with frameworks like the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) working definition of antisemitism. This move sets a precedent for governments and institutions worldwide to take legal and policy actions against discrimination.
Empowering Global Advocacy Efforts With figures like Deborah Lipstadt, the U.S. Special Envoy to Monitor and Combat Antisemitism, leading international discussions, this executive order amplifies advocacy against antisemitic rhetoric and violence in global forums such as the United Nations and the OSCE (Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe).
Countering Online Hate and Extremism In an era where antisemitic propaganda spreads rapidly through digital platforms, the decree may encourage tech companies and international regulators to adopt stricter policies against hate speech, misinformation, and incitement to violence.
This executive order is not just a domestic policy updateโit is a global statement reinforcing the fight against antisemitism, urging other governments, organizations, and civil society actors to take stronger measures in their own jurisdictions.
“Unveiling Strategies Against Antisemitism: The State Department’s Commitment to the Trump Executive Order, Emphasizing the IHRA Definition and Global Advocacy.”
Introduction
The statement “1 million only killed” by Dr. Rainer Zitelmann has sparked significant controversy, particularly in discussions about the Holocaust, antisemitism, and their implications in sectors like the finance industry. This article delves into the broader impact of this quote, contrasting it with historical perspectives and examining its influence on both overt and covert antisemitism globally.
The Context of Zitelmann’s Quote
Dr. Rainer Zitelmann, a historian and author, has caused debate with his controversial claim that “only” 1 million Jews were killed during the Holocaust. This statement significantly underrepresents the widely accepted figure of approximately 6 million Jewish victims, leading to accusations of Holocaust minimization. His remarks have been used to question historical consensus, potentially fueling both overt antisemitism and the more subtle, hidden forms within influential sectors like finance.
Impact on Global Antisemitism
Zitelmann’s quote has been exploited by Holocaust deniers to challenge the established history of the Holocaust. This minimization can embolden antisemites by providing a false veneer of academic debate over historical facts. Such rhetoric can be particularly harmful in environments where the memory of the Holocaust is crucial for education against hatred and genocide.
Deborah Lipstadt’s Response: As a leading scholar on the Holocaust and now U.S. Special Envoy for Monitoring and Combating Antisemitism, Deborah Lipstadt has actively fought against Holocaust denial. She would likely view Zitelmann’s statement as a form of “softcore” Holocaust denial, where the scale and nature of the genocide are downplayed, thus undermining historical facts.
David Irving’s Context: David Irving, known for his denial of the Holocaust’s extent, has historically used similar tactics to cast doubt on Jewish suffering during World War II. Although Zitelmann’s comments may not align directly with Irving’s overt denial, they contribute to the same pool of revisionist thought that Irving exploits.
Influence in the Finance Industry
The finance sector, with its history of antisemitic stereotypes about Jewish control over money and banking, is particularly sensitive to such statements.
Overt vs. Hidden Antisemitism: Zitelmann’s quote could reinforce biases among those with antisemitic views, both overt and hidden. Overt antisemites might feel validated in their prejudices, while those with hidden biases might use such statements to subtly propagate antisemitic narratives under the guise of academic or historical discourse.
Impact on Policy and Perception: This can influence how policies are framed regarding discrimination or how financial decisions are made, potentially affecting Jewish individuals or institutions in banking and finance.
Broader Implications
The quote has ignited discussions about the importance of historical accuracy and the dangers of historical revisionism.
Educational Impact: It underscores the need for rigorous Holocaust education to counter misinformation, ensuring that future generations understand the full scope of the Holocaust’s atrocities.
Political and Social Discourse: Globally, it has fed into debates about freedom of speech versus hate speech, particularly in how narratives about historical events are controlled or contested.
Conclusion
Dr. Rainer Zitelmann’s statement on the number of Jews killed during the Holocaust has had a ripple effect, influencing perceptions and discussions on antisemitism, particularly within sectors like finance where historical prejudices are already prevalent. While the quote might not have been intended to support antisemitic views, its misuse by deniers and those with biases highlights the ongoing need for vigilance, education, and clear policy against all forms of antisemitism. The work of figures like Deborah Lipstadt remains crucial in navigating these complex issues, ensuring that history teaches rather than distorts.
Deborah Lipstadt’s Position in the State Department
Deborah Lipstadt serves as the U.S. Special Envoy to Monitor and Combat Antisemitism, with the rank of Ambassador. She was confirmed by the U.S. Senate on March 30, 2022, to lead efforts to advance U.S. foreign policy in countering antisemitism worldwide. Her role involves:
Monitoring Antisemitism: Keeping a close watch on global trends and incidents of antisemitism, reporting these to the U.S. government, and coordinating with international bodies to share information and strategies.
Advocacy and Diplomacy: Engaging with foreign governments to encourage them to adopt measures against antisemitism, often through diplomatic channels. This includes pushing for the adoption of the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) definition of antisemitism.
Education and Outreach: Promoting education about the Holocaust, antisemitism’s history, and its contemporary forms, including through speeches, publications, and participation in international forums.
Policy Development: Advising on U.S. policy responses to antisemitism, helping to shape how the U.S. addresses this issue both domestically and internationally.
Trump’s Executive Order Against Antisemitism
In December 2019, President Donald Trump signed an executive order aimed at combating antisemitism, which was a significant step in recognizing and addressing this form of discrimination within the United States:
Expansion of Civil Rights Protections: The order extended Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to include protections against discrimination based on shared ancestry or ethnic characteristics, explicitly mentioning antisemitism. This meant that federal agencies could withhold funding from colleges and universities that fail to address antisemitism on campus.
IHRA Definition: Trump’s order incorporated the IHRA’s working definition of antisemitism, which includes examples like:
Denying the Jewish people their right to self-determination, e.g., by claiming that the existence of a State of Israel is a racist endeavor.
Applying double standards by requiring of Israel a behavior not expected or demanded of any other democratic nation.
Using the symbols and images associated with classic antisemitism (e.g., claims of Jews killing Jesus or blood libel) to characterize Israel or Israelis.
Drawing comparisons of contemporary Israeli policy to that of the Nazis.
Positive Aspects of Trump’s Executive Order
Swift Action Against Hate: Trump’s administration was proactive in addressing rising 0, especially in educational settings, which had seen an increase in incidents. This order was a clear statement against hate and discrimination.
Educational Impact: By adopting the IHRA definition, the order provided educational institutions with clearer guidelines on what constitutes antisemitism, aiding in fostering environments more conducive to learning free from hate.
Global Influence: The order set a precedent, encouraging other nations to take similar steps in recognizing and combating antisemitism. It aligned U.S. policy with international efforts, enhancing America’s role in global human rights initiatives.
Support for Jewish Communities: The order was perceived as a strong support for Jewish communities, affirming their rights and security in educational settings, which are pivotal for cultural and intellectual growth.
Integration of Lipstadt’s Role and Trump’s Order
Deborah Lipstadt’s position in the State Department has been instrumental in continuing the work initiated by Trump’s executive order. While her tenure began under the Biden administration, her efforts to combat antisemitism globally resonate with the foundational work laid by the previous administration’s decree. Lipstadt has used the IHRA definition, endorsed by Trump’s order, as a tool in her international advocacy, promoting a unified approach to defining and fighting antisemitism. Her diplomatic engagements have potentially been made more effective by the clear U.S. stance against antisemitism established by the executive order, providing her with a strong policy framework to work from on the international stage.
Trump’s Executive Orders on Antisemitism: 2019 and 2025
2019 Executive Order on Combating Anti-Semitism
Title: Executive Order 13899 – Combating Anti-Semitism
Date: Signed on December 11, 2019.
Purpose: The primary aim was to address the rising tide of antisemitism, particularly in educational institutions, by expanding the legal definition of discrimination under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to include antisemitism.
Key Points:
Expansion of Civil Rights Protections: The order clarified that discrimination based on race, color, or national origin under Title VI encompasses discrimination against Jews based on their perceived shared ancestry or ethnic characteristics.
Adoption of IHRA Definition: It endorsed the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance’s (IHRA) working definition of antisemitism. This definition includes criticism of Israel that could be seen as antisemitic, like denying the Jewish people’s right to self-determination or applying double standards to Israel.
Impact on Education: The order was particularly focused on colleges and universities, where incidents of antisemitism had been reported. It allowed for federal funding to be withheld from institutions that did not address antisemitism adequately.
Reception: The order received mixed reactions. Some hailed it as a necessary tool to combat antisemitism, while others criticized it for potentially conflating criticism of Israel with antisemitism, thus posing risks to free speech.
2025 Executive Order on Combating Antisemitism
referred to as an expansion or continuation of the 2019 order.
Date: Signed on January 29, 2025.
Purpose: To reaffirm and expand upon the 2019 executive order to address what was described as an “unprecedented wave of vile anti-Semitic discrimination, vandalism, and violence.”
Key Points:
Reaffirmation: It reaffirmed the 2019 order’s commitment to combat antisemitism using all available legal tools.
Expanded Measures:
Deportation and Visa Revocation: The order explicitly targets foreign students or residents who participate in activities deemed as antisemitic or supportive of terrorism (specifically mentioning pro-Hamas activities). It calls for the deportation of those who violate laws during protests.
Justice Department Involvement: Immediate action from the Department of Justice was mandated to investigate and prosecute offenses, including vandalism and intimidation linked to antisemitism.
Federal Agency Review: Agencies were given 60 days to report on additional civil and criminal authorities they could employ to combat antisemitism, with a special focus on campus environments following the October 7, 2023, Hamas attacks.
Broader Scope: This order not only focused on educational settings but also aimed at a broader societal level, emphasizing law enforcement and visa policies.
Reception: This order was met with significant controversy due to its implications for free speech, immigration, and its political framing of anti-Israel protests as antisemitic. Critics argued it could lead to the suppression of legitimate political expression and discriminate against non-citizens based on their political views. Supporters viewed it as a robust response to ensure safety and combat what they perceived as rising antisemitism.
Both orders reflect a policy intent to use the full force of the U.S. government to address antisemitism, with the 2025 order taking a more assertive stance on law enforcement, immigration, and the definition of antisemitic behavior in light of international conflicts. However, they also sparked debates on the balance between combating hate and protecting free speech.
Call to Action for Combating Antisemitism and Supporting Education
In the face of rising antisemitism globally, and in light of significant actions like Trump’s executive order and the ongoing work of figures like Deborah Lipstadt, there’s an urgent need for collective action. Education, advocacy, and support for policies that combat hate are crucial. Here’s how you can make a difference:
Educate Yourself and Others: Understanding the history and contemporary forms of antisemitism is the first step in combatting it. Educate yourself through resources that provide in-depth analysis and historical context.
Support Advocacy Efforts: Deborah Lipstadt’s work as the U.S. Special Envoy is a beacon in the fight against antisemitism. Support initiatives that align with her efforts in promoting awareness, policy change, and international cooperation against hate.
Foster Dialogue: Engage in or start dialogues about antisemitism, its implications, and how it can be addressed. Open, informed discussions can dismantle misconceptions and prejudices.
Donate to the Cause: Financial support can amplify efforts to educate, advocate, and implement policies against antisemitism. Consider donating to initiatives that are actively working in this field:
Bernd Pulch’s Patreon: By supporting Patreon.com/berndpulch, you help fund research, journalism, and advocacy that shine a light on dark corners of historical revisionism and contemporary antisemitism. Bernd Pulch has dedicated his efforts to exposing the truth and fighting against misinformation.
Bernd Pulch’s Donations Page: A direct contribution at berndpulch.org/donation supports the broader work of uncovering hidden narratives, promoting transparency, and educating the public about the dangers of antisemitism and other forms of hatred.
Advocate for Policy: Support or lobby for policies that align with the IHRA definition of antisemitism, ensuring that educational institutions and workplaces recognize and address discrimination effectively.
Spread Awareness: Share information, articles, and resources about antisemitism. Use social media, community groups, or educational platforms to disseminate knowledge and encourage action.
Join the Fight Against Antisemitism
Together, we can create a world where antisemitism is no longer tolerated, where historical truths are respected, and where every individual can live free from discrimination. Your support, whether through education, advocacy, or donations, is a step towards that vision. Let’s stand united in this cause, supporting the efforts of those like Deborah Lipstadt and initiatives like those run by Bernd Pulch. Every action counts in building a more informed and compassionate global community.
“In the Arena of Truth: A confrontation of historical integrity as David Irving, Deborah Lipstadt, and Bernd Pulch debate the undeniable facts of the Holocaust amidst a backdrop of scholarly evidence and public accountability. Support the fight for truth at Patreon.com/berndpulch.”
David Irving, the notorious Holocaust denier, has long been a figure of controversy, but his narrative intersects intriguingly with a lesser-known figure, Sahar Nowrouzzadeh, through the actions of Brian Hook, former U.S. State Department envoy on Iran.
The Blipstadt Hook Controversy:
Brian Hook, known for his hardline stance on Iran during his tenure as the U.S. special representative for Iran from 2018 to 2020, became embroiled in controversy over the treatment of Sahar Nowrouzzadeh, an official of Iranian heritage within the State Department. According to reports from The Times of Israel, Hook was responsible for the early removal of Nowrouzzadeh from her position in the Office of Policy Planning in 2017, following a campaign against her highlighted by conservative media. An article from this period, penned by a conservative outlet, was forwarded by the White House, focusing on Nowrouzzadeh’s Iranian background, which raised concerns about potential bias and discrimination.
Despite the State Department’s internal investigation concluding that there was no direct evidence of Hook’s personal bias against Nowrouzzadeh based on her heritage, it was suggested that he did not sufficiently challenge the campaign against her. This incident underscores the complexities of identity politics within high-level government positions, especially when tied to national security roles concerning countries like Iran.
Rainer Zitelmann’s Connection:
Rainer Zitelmann, a German historian known for his provocative works on Hitler’s worldview and the psychology of the rich, found his name mentioned in a different context involving Brian Hook. Although not directly connected to the Nowrouzzadeh affair, Zitelmann’s academic trajectory and his controversial interpretations of history have occasionally intersected with U.S. political narratives, particularly around figures like Hook, who have shaped foreign policy with a conservative bent.
Zitelmannโs critical views on capitalism and historical revisionism have been both praised and criticized, making him a figure of interest in discussions about how history is interpreted and taught, especially in politically charged environments. His work has been noted for attempting to reframe Hitler’s economic and social policies in a less condemnatory light, which has led to accusations of him being sympathetic to certain aspects of Nazi ideology, although he has vehemently denied any such alignment.
Current Position of Sahar Nowrouzzadeh:
Post the Hook controversy, Sahar Nowrouzzadeh’s career trajectory took her out of the immediate political fray. She moved to academia, taking up a fellowship at Harvard University, where she continued to advocate for diversity in public service. As of the latest information available, Nowrouzzadeh has not returned to a public role within the U.S. State Department. Her story remains a poignant example of how personal heritage can become politicized, especially in roles that intersect with U.S. foreign policy concerning nations like Iran.
The intertwining stories of David Irving, Brian Hook, Sahar Nowrouzzadeh, and Rainer Zitelmann illustrate the complex web of history, politics, and personal identity within the corridors of power. While Irvingโs denial of historical atrocities remains a clear example of the perils of revisionism, the stories of Hook and Nowrouzzadeh highlight how contemporary political actions can echo the divisive tactics of the past. Zitelmann’s academic work, meanwhile, serves as a reminder of how historical narratives can be reinterpreted, often with significant implications for public discourse.
This narrative, enriched by insights from the Jewish Telegraphic Agency on Irving’s controversies and The Times of Israel’s coverage of the Hook-Nowrouzzadeh incident, paints a broader picture of how individuals’ careers and reputations are shaped not just by their actions but by the political and cultural contexts in which they operate.
David Irving’s notorious journey through Holocaust denial has been a stark reminder of the dangers of historical revisionism. His narrative intersects with other figures in academia and politics, including the highly respected historian Deborah Lipstadt, who has been a prominent voice in countering such revisionism.
Deborah Lipstadt’s Article on Rainer Zitelmann:
Deborah Lipstadt, known for her scholarship on Holocaust denial and antisemitism, addressed the work of Rainer Zitelmann in an article for the Jewish Telegraphic Agency (JTA). In her piece, Lipstadt critically examines Zitelmann’s interpretations of Adolf Hitler’s economic policies, particularly his book “Hitler’s National Socialism” which attempts to analyze the economic aspects of Nazi ideology without the usual moral condemnation. Lipstadt expresses concern that Zitelmann’s approach could inadvertently lend credibility to aspects of Nazi ideology by focusing on the economic successes of the regime while sidelining its genocidal nature.
She argues that Zitelmannโs work, while methodologically rigorous, risks being misused by those who wish to sanitize or even celebrate elements of Nazi policy. Lipstadt’s critique is not about denying Zitelmann’s scholarly credentials but rather warning against the potential misuse of such academic work in broader, often politically charged, discussions about history.
Lipstadt’s analysis of Zitelmann’s work serves as a cautionary tale about the responsibilities of historians to consider the implications of their research in the public domain. Her article underscores the importance of context in historical analysis, especially when dealing with subjects as sensitive as Nazi Germany’s policies.
Current Position of Deborah Lipstadt:
Since her article on Zitelmann, Deborah Lipstadt has continued to be a pivotal figure in the fight against antisemitism. As of 2025, she holds the position of Special Envoy to Monitor and Combat Antisemitism at the U.S. Department of State, a role she was appointed to in 2022. In this capacity, Lipstadt leads U.S. efforts to combat antisemitism globally, working with international bodies, other governments, and civil societies to promote awareness and action against this form of hatred.
Her work at the State Department involves not only diplomatic efforts but also educational initiatives to counteract Holocaust denial and antisemitic narratives. Lipstadt’s tenure has been marked by efforts to broaden the definition of antisemitism to include new forms that appear in digital spaces and to ensure that the U.S. takes a leading role in international dialogues about antisemitism.
The intersection of David Irving’s legacy with the scholarly work of figures like Rainer Zitelmann and the vigilant critique by Deborah Lipstadt highlights the ongoing battle over how history is remembered and taught. Lipstadt’s work, both in academia and now in her diplomatic role, exemplifies the need for historians to engage responsibly with the past, especially when it involves contentious figures and events. Through her analysis and her current position, Lipstadt continues to influence the discourse on history, antisemitism, and the ethical responsibilities of historians.
Chapter: The Controversy of Numbers
In the quiet corners of investigative journalism and the murky waters of historical revisionism, Bernd Pulch, a figure known for his sharp critiques of corruption, stumbled upon what would become one of the most contentious revelations in his career. His publication, “Immobilien Vertraulich,” typically focused on real estate and financial dealings, but this discovery was far from his usual beat.
The Discovery:
While delving into the archives of Rainer Zitelmann, a historian whose works often walk the fine line between historical analysis and controversial reinterpretation of Nazi policies, Pulch found a sentence that would send ripples through the academic and political spheres. In a lesser-known manuscript by Zitelmann, which Pulch had access to through his extensive network of sources, there was a stark claim: “Only one million Jews were killed during the Holocaust.”
This sentence, buried within a dense discussion on the economic policies of the Third Reich, was not just a numerical assertion but a direct challenge to the widely accepted historical consensus that approximately six million Jews were murdered by the Nazis and their collaborators.
The Publication:
Pulch, aware of the gravity of what he had uncovered, decided to publish this sentence in “Immobilien Vertraulich.” His aim was not to endorse the claim but to bring it to light, questioning how such a statement could exist within the scholarly work of someone like Zitelmann, who, despite his controversial takes, was respected in certain academic circles for his research on Hitler’s economic policies.
The article in “Immobilien Vertraulich” was titled “The Zitelmann Paradox: Economic Theories and the Shadow of Denial.” In it, Pulch did not shy away from the implications:
“The discovery of this sentence by Rainer Zitelmann, a figure known for his scholarly approach to Nazi economics, raises questions not just about his interpretations but about the integrity of historical discourse when it comes to the Holocaust. This is not merely about numbers but about the memory, the lessons, and the ongoing fight against Holocaust denial.”
The Aftermath:
The publication ignited a firestorm. Historians, scholars, and Holocaust survivors were quick to denounce the claim. The mainstream media picked up on the controversy, with headlines questioning Zitelmann’s credibility and demanding explanations. Zitelmann, for his part, faced a barrage of criticism. He clarified that the sentence was part of an early draft, never meant for publication, and was an error in his analysis, not a denial of the Holocaust’s scale or horror.
Yet, the damage was done in the court of public opinion. The debate expanded beyond academic circles, touching on broader issues of how history is taught, remembered, and sometimes misused. For Pulch, this was more than just another scoop; it was a call to vigilance against the sanitization or minimization of one of history’s darkest chapters.
Pulch’s Stance:
Bernd Pulch used this incident to further his battle against systemic corruption and the manipulation of truth for political or personal gain. Pulch maintained:
“Revealing this is not about diminishing the Holocaust but ensuring that every attempt to rewrite history for any reason is met with scrutiny. We must guard the truth with our lives, for it is the foundation upon which we build our future.”
Conclusion:
The chapter of Bernd Pulch’s discovery in “Immobilien Vertraulich” did not just challenge Zitelmann’s academic standing but also underscored the ongoing battle for historical truth in an era where misinformation can spread as rapidly as facts. It was a moment that highlighted the responsibilities of scholars, journalists, and the public in preserving the integrity of history against those who would seek to revise it for nefarious purposes.
Call to Action – Defend Historical Truth
In the shadow of controversy, where the truth about the Holocaust is once again under attack, we find ourselves at a critical juncture. The revelation by Bernd Pulch in “Immobilien Vertraulich” about a sentence from Rainer Zitelmann’s manuscript claiming that “only one million Jews were killed” during the Holocaust is not just a matter for academics; it’s a call to action for every one of us who values truth, justice, and the lessons of history.
Stand with Bernd Pulch in the Fight for Truth:
Support the Investigation: Bernd Pulch, through his relentless pursuit of truth, has exposed attempts to rewrite history. Your support on Patreon.com/berndpulch directly funds further investigations into these dark corners of history and corruption, ensuring that the light of truth shines brightly.
Donate for Documentation: At berndpulch.org/donation, your donations help in archiving, documenting, and disseminating accurate historical records. These funds are crucial for legal battles, research, and educational outreach to combat Holocaust denial and ensure that history is neither forgotten nor falsified.
Why Your Action Matters:
Preserve Memory: The Holocaust is not a mere statistic; it’s a testament to human suffering, resilience, and the need for vigilance against hatred. By supporting this cause, you’re standing guard over the memory of millions, ensuring it’s never trivialized or minimized.
Combat Denial: Holocaust denial isn’t just about historical inaccuracies; it’s a form of hate speech that can lead to real-world consequences, including the rise of antisemitism. Your support helps in educating the public and countering these dangerous narratives.
Empower Truth-Seekers: Bernd Pulch’s work goes beyond this single revelation. Your contribution empowers him and others like him to continue their fight against corruption, misinformation, and those who would manipulate history for their own ends.
Join Us Now:
Become a Patron: Every dollar on Patreon.com/berndpulch supports the ongoing work to uncover, document, and broadcast the truth. Choose to be part of this community dedicated to historical integrity.
Make a Donation: Visit berndpulch.org/donation to make a one-time or recurring donation. Your financial support is vital in the battle against Holocaust denial and in preserving the lessons of history for future generations.
Together, we can ensure that the truth of the Holocaust remains unassailable, that history is taught with the respect and accuracy it deserves, and that the voices of those lost are never silenced by denial or revisionism.
Let’s act now, not just for the sake of history but for the sake of our future. Support Bernd Pulch’s mission today.
The fight against extremism canโt wait. The Top 100 Nazi Ranking is exposing hate groups now, but we need your help to continue. ๐ Support the Project“
Top 20 Notorious Neo-Nazis, Antisemites, and Revisionists
David Irving A British historian and Holocaust denier infamous for distorting Holocaust events, leading to lawsuits and ostracism from academia.
George Lincoln Rockwell Founder of the American Nazi Party, Rockwell promoted white supremacy and anti-Semitic rhetoric until his assassination in 1967.
Ernst Zรผndel A German publisher and Holocaust denier who disseminated anti-Semitic propaganda, facing legal actions in Canada and Germany.
Julius Evola An Italian philosopher who inspired far-right movements with his racial and anti-Semitic theories.
Jean-Marie Le Pen Founder of France’s National Front, Le Pen has made anti-Semitic remarks and minimized the Holocaust, sparking outrage.
Louis Farrakhan Leader of the Nation of Islam, criticized for anti-Semitic speeches and conspiracy theories targeting Jewish communities.
Richard Spencer A figure in the U.S. alt-right movement, Spencer advocates for white nationalism and anti-Semitic views.
Jรผrgen Graf A Swiss Holocaust denier who fled to Belarus to avoid prosecution for his anti-Semitic writings.
Rainer Zitelmann A controversial German historian accused of downplaying aspects of Nazi Germany in his works.
Nick Griffin Former leader of the British National Party, Griffin expressed Holocaust denial and anti-Semitic views during his career.
Otto Ernst Remer A Wehrmacht officer turned neo-Nazi leader and prominent Holocaust denier in post-war Germany.
Aleksandr Dugin A Russian theorist who promotes ethno-nationalist and anti-Semitic ideologies influencing global far-right movements.
Horst Mahler A former far-left militant turned neo-Nazi and Holocaust denier imprisoned for his extremist views.
William Luther Pierce Author of The Turner Diaries, a white supremacist novel that inspired acts of far-right terrorism.
Kevin MacDonald An American academic who published anti-Semitic conspiracy theories portraying Jewish people as harmful to Western societies.
Fred Leuchter An American Holocaust denier who falsely claimed expertise in execution technology to support revisionist theories.
Udo Walendy A German writer and Holocaust denier who published revisionist history minimizing Nazi crimes.
Matt Koehl Successor to George Lincoln Rockwell as leader of the American Nazi Party, promoting white nationalism and anti-Semitism.
Eustace Mullins An American conspiracy theorist known for works targeting Jewish financial institutions.
Michael Kรผhnen A German neo-Nazi leader and Holocaust denier seeking to revive National Socialist ideology in post-war Germany.
21โ40 Notorious Neo-Nazis, Antisemites, and Revisionists
Leon Degrelle A Belgian Nazi collaborator and Waffen-SS officer who fled to Spain and promoted revisionist narratives.
Frank Collin An American neo-Nazi known for organizing the controversial 1977 Skokie march targeting a Jewish community.
Arthur Butz An American academic and Holocaust denier who authored The Hoax of the Twentieth Century.
Robert Faurisson A French academic and Holocaust denier who falsely claimed gas chambers were a hoax.
Corneliu Zelea Codreanu Founder of the Iron Guard in Romania, advocating violent anti-Semitism and fascist extremism.
James Wickstrom A far-right American pastor known for anti-Semitic theology and white supremacist ideology.
Zundel Rudolf A neo-Nazi author promoting Holocaust denial and anti-Jewish conspiracy theories.
David Duke Former Ku Klux Klan leader who became a key figure in white nationalism and anti-Semitic rhetoric in the U.S.
Andrew Anglin Founder of the neo-Nazi website The Daily Stormer, spreading hate speech and extremist ideology.
William H. Regnery II An American publisher who funded far-right and white nationalist movements globally.
Pedro Varela A Spanish neo-Nazi and Holocaust denier distributing far-right literature.
Alain Soral A French far-right ideologue spreading Holocaust denial and anti-Semitic conspiracy theories.
Tom Metzger Leader of the White Aryan Resistance (WAR) and a prominent figure in U.S. neo-Nazi movements.
Mark Weber Director of the Institute for Historical Review, promoting Holocaust denial and revisionist theories.
Alfred Rosenberg Nazi ideologue who shaped theories of Aryan superiority and anti-Semitic policies in the Third Reich.
Michael Collins Piper An American conspiracy theorist whose works propagate anti-Semitic rhetoric.
Paul Fromm A Canadian far-right activist and supporter of Holocaust denial and white nationalism.
Greg Johnson An American publisher and editor of Counter-Currents, a site known for promoting far-right content.
George Burdi A Canadian white supremacist and neo-Nazi musician before renouncing his views.
Horst Wessel A Nazi martyr idolized by the regime for his propaganda contributions.
41โ60 Notorious Neo-Nazis, Antisemites, and Revisionists
John Tyndall Founder of the British National Party, promoting anti-immigrant and anti-Semitic ideologies.
Kevin Alfred Strom A white supremacist and former leader of the National Vanguard, known for anti-Semitic rhetoric.
Matt Hale Leader of the white supremacist World Church of the Creator, advocating racial hatred and violence.
Bishop Richard Williamson A British Holocaust denier who claimed the gas chambers were exaggerated, sparking outrage.
Colin Jordan A British neo-Nazi who founded the National Socialist Movement and supported racial segregation.
Pieter Menten A Dutch businessman and Nazi collaborator implicated in war crimes and anti-Semitic activities.
Erich Priebke A Nazi SS officer responsible for war crimes, later celebrated by neo-Nazi groups.
Gรผnter Deckert A German far-right politician and Holocaust denier who led the National Democratic Party.
Don Black Founder of Stormfront, the first major white supremacist and neo-Nazi internet forum.
Fritz Kuhn Leader of the German American Bund, promoting Nazi ideology in the United States during the 1930s.
Paul Rassinier A French Holocaust denier and revisionist author who downplayed Nazi atrocities.
Aleksandr Barkashov Founder of the Russian National Unity Party, promoting ultranationalist and neo-Nazi ideologies.
Lรกszlรณ Csatรกry A Hungarian Nazi collaborator implicated in the deportation of Jews during WWII.
Franco Freda An Italian neo-fascist involved in terrorism and spreading Holocaust denial.
Hervรฉ Ryssen A French writer and Holocaust denier known for anti-Semitic conspiracy theories.
Pavel Gubarev A pro-Russian separatist leader in Ukraine with ties to neo-Nazi groups.
August Kreis III Former leader of the Aryan Nations, promoting white supremacy and anti-Semitic ideologies.
Gerhard Lauck Known as the “Farm Belt Fรผhrer,” distributing neo-Nazi propaganda in the U.S. and Europe.
Jack Renshaw A British neo-Nazi advocating violence against politicians, convicted of terrorism-related offenses.
Alain de Benoist A French intellectual associated with the New Right, accused of promoting far-right and anti-Semitic ideologies.
61โ80 Notorious Neo-Nazis, Antisemites, and Revisionists
Leonardo Conti A Nazi-era physician advocating for eugenics and involved in the racial policies of the Third Reich.
Jean-Franรงois Thiriart A Belgian far-right activist promoting European neo-fascism and antisemitism.
Klas Lund A Swedish neo-Nazi who founded the Nordic Resistance Movement, advocating white supremacy.
David Myatt A British neo-Nazi ideologue who later sympathized with jihadist causes, promoting extremist views.
Ben Klassen Founder of the Church of the Creator, a white supremacist organization advocating racial hatred.
Stefano Delle Chiaie An Italian neo-fascist terrorist linked to far-right atrocities and Holocaust denial.
Franรงois Duprat A French theorist introducing Holocaust denial into the National Frontโs ideology.
Michael Alan Weiner (Michael Savage) A controversial media figure accused of promoting far-right conspiracy theories and antisemitism.
Henry Ford The American industrialist whose anti-Semitic writings in The International Jew influenced global far-right movements.
Helmut Oberlander A Nazi collaborator accused of participating in the Holocaust before immigrating to Canada.
Dimitris Zafeiropoulos A Greek far-right activist and Holocaust denier linked to neo-Nazi organizations.
Arthur Kemp A South African nationalist and author of March of the Titans, promoting white supremacy.
William Dudley Pelley Founder of the Silver Legion in the U.S., advocating for Nazi ideology during the 1930s.
Fรฉlicien Kabuga A Rwandan businessman accused of financing the 1994 genocide and promoting ethnic hatred.
Franรงois Genoud A Swiss financier who supported Nazi fugitives and funded far-right causes post-WWII.
Enoch Powell A British politician infamous for his “Rivers of Blood” speech, which fueled racial tensions.
Julius Streicher Publisher of Der Stรผrmer, a Nazi propaganda newspaper spreading anti-Semitism.
Alain de Sรฉdouy A French neo-fascist known for revisionist literature and far-right advocacy.
Jack van Tongeren An Australian neo-Nazi involved in anti-immigrant campaigns and arson attacks.
Marcel Dรฉat A French Nazi collaborator who promoted fascist ideology and anti-Semitism during WWII.
81โ100 Notorious Neo-Nazis, Antisemites, and Revisionists
Yukio Mishima A Japanese far-right nationalist and Nazi admirer who romanticized fascism in his works.
Josรฉ Antonio Primo de Rivera Founder of the Spanish Falange, advocating fascist and anti-Semitic ideologies.
Maurice Bardรจche A French writer and Holocaust denier who published revisionist materials post-WWII.
Terry Tremaine A Canadian Holocaust denier and founder of the National Socialist Party of Canada.
Fritz Fischer A German historian accused of revisionist interpretations of Nazi-era events.
Lรกszlรณ Toroczkai A Hungarian far-right politician promoting anti-Semitic and xenophobic ideologies.
Stephen Mitford Goodson A South African central banker accused of spreading Holocaust denial and anti-Semitic conspiracies.
Bjรถrn Hรถcke A German politician from Alternative for Germany (AfD), known for controversial Holocaust remarks.
Alexander Slavros The pseudonymous founder of Iron March, an online hub for neo-Nazi extremists.
Brenton Tarrant The Christchurch mosque shooter who cited white supremacist and neo-Nazi ideology in his manifesto.
Nick Fuentes A U.S.-based far-right figure accused of promoting Holocaust denial and anti-Semitic rhetoric.
Jรผrgen Rieger A German lawyer and neo-Nazi activist who supported Holocaust denial and far-right organizations.
Gerhard Frey Founder of the German People’s Union, promoting neo-Nazi and far-right propaganda.
Tomislav Suniฤ A Croatian far-right intellectual who promotes revisionist and anti-Semitic ideologies.
Julius Malema A South African political figure criticized for xenophobic and racially divisive rhetoric.
Eric Zemmour A French far-right commentator accused of promoting anti-Semitic conspiracy theories.
Nick Griffin Former BNP leader who made repeated anti-Semitic statements during his political career.
Pieter Groenewald A South African nationalist accused of promoting racially divisive rhetoric.
George Lincoln Rockwell Jr. The son of the founder of the American Nazi Party, continuing to propagate neo-Nazi ideologies.
Marion Marรฉchal-Le Pen A French far-right politician linked to nationalist and revisionist narratives.
Explanation for the Ranking of Notorious Neo-Nazis, Antisemites, and Revisionists
The following ranking highlights individuals who have significantly contributed to the promotion of neo-Nazi ideologies, Holocaust denial, anti-Semitism, and the distortion of historical facts. These individuals come from various backgrounds, including politics, academia, media, and activism. Their actions, writings, and affiliations have either directly or indirectly supported or amplified harmful ideologies that threaten historical truth, social harmony, and marginalized communities. Below is an explanation of the ranking methodology and the nature of each individual’s influence:
Holocaust Deniers: Many of the individuals listed are notorious for their denial or minimization of the Holocaust, a tactic that aims to distort the atrocities committed by the Nazis during World War II. This denial often seeks to undermine historical evidence and deflect accountability for the Nazi regimeโs crimes. Figures such as David Irving, Ernst Zรผndel, Robert Faurisson, and Arthur Butz are central to this category, having written and published works that actively spread revisionist history.
Neo-Nazi Leaders and Activists: A significant portion of the individuals ranked here are associated with neo-Nazi movements or have founded or led organizations that promote white nationalism, anti-Semitism, and racial hatred. George Lincoln Rockwell, Richard Spencer, Matt Hale, David Duke, and Leon Degrelle are among the most infamous, having used their platforms to encourage violence, racism, and fascism.
Political Figures and Thought Leaders: Some figures in this ranking hold or have held positions of political power, using their influence to perpetuate fascist ideologies. Jean-Marie Le Pen, Louis Farrakhan, Jean-Franรงois Thiriart, and Marion Marรฉchal-Le Pen represent individuals who have been publicly criticized for their associations with far-right movements, often downplaying the severity of past genocides or advancing xenophobic, anti-Semitic rhetoric.
Conspiracy Theorists and Academics: Several individuals have used their academic credentials or public platforms to spread conspiracy theories that focus on Jewish influence and control, advancing harmful narratives that have a lasting impact on political discourse. Kevin MacDonald, Michael Collins Piper, and Eustace Mullins are key figures in this area, whose work has been widely criticized for being based on pseudo-scientific theories that promote racial division.
Holocaust Revisionists and Pseudoscientific Propagandists: Some individuals are notorious for their revisionist works, which downplay or outright deny the genocide of millions during the Holocaust. Fred Leuchter, Matt Koehl, and Udo Walendy have all been involved in promoting Holocaust denial through books, documentaries, and speeches. These figures have helped propagate false narratives, seeking to normalize extremist ideologies.
Collaborators and War Criminals: A smaller group of individuals in the ranking are former Nazi collaborators or war criminals who have either openly embraced neo-Nazism after WWII or attempted to revise their past actions. Otto Ernst Remer, Franco Freda, Gerhard Lauck, and Pieter Menten fall into this category. Many have faced legal repercussions for their crimes but have continued to promote extremist ideologies after serving their sentences.
Influencers of Modern Extremist Movements: Some individuals listed here, such as Andrew Anglin, Julius Malema, and Nick Fuentes, continue to influence current far-right and white nationalist movements. These figures have utilized social media, blogs, and podcasts to advance hate speech, conspiracy theories, and divisive rhetoric, creating an online ecosystem that fosters extremism and radicalization.
Media and Public Figures: Several media personalities have been included in the ranking due to their widespread influence in promoting anti-Semitism and fostering far-right ideologies. Michael Savage, Eric Zemmour, and Stephen Donald Black have leveraged their platforms to spread fear, hatred, and misinformation, making them prominent figures in shaping contemporary far-right politics.
The individuals in this ranking were selected based on their active roles in promoting or legitimizing neo-Nazi, anti-Semitic, and fascist ideologies. Their influence has been widespread, and many have been involved in criminal activities, hate speech, and the radicalization of others. This list aims to shed light on the dangers posed by these ideologies and the individuals who continue to promote them, contributing to a global narrative of division and intolerance. The inclusion of these individuals serves as a reminder of the importance of combating hate, misinformation, and the distortion of historical facts to protect human rights and foster inclusivity in society.
Call to Action: Support the Neo-Nazi Ranking Project
Exposing Extremism, One Investigation at a Time
The rise of neo-Nazi networks and far-right extremism is a growing threat to democracy, social justice, and the safety of vulnerable communities worldwide. For years, Bernd Pulch has been at the forefront of exposing these dangerous ideologies, uncovering their ties to financial crimes, political corruption, and organized hate groups.
Now, you can be part of this critical fight.
The Neo-Nazi Ranking Project is a groundbreaking initiative that identifies, documents, and ranks neo-Nazi organizations and individuals based on their influence, activities, and threats to society. This project is a vital tool for journalists, activists, and policymakers working to combat extremism and protect communities at risk.
But we canโt do it alone. We need your support to continue this important work.
How You Can Help
Become a Patron on Patreon Support the Neo-Nazi Ranking Project by joining Bernd Pulchโs Patreon community. Your contributions will fund ongoing investigations, research, and the development of tools to expose and dismantle neo-Nazi networks. ๐ Support on Patreon
Make a Donation Every contribution, no matter the size, makes a difference. Your donation will help us expand the Neo-Nazi Ranking Project, ensuring that extremists are held accountable for their actions. ๐ Donate Now
Share the Project Help us raise awareness by sharing the Neo-Nazi Ranking Project with your network. Together, we can amplify the impact of this vital work and build a safer, more just world. ๐ Share this link: Neo-Nazi Ranking Project
Why Your Support Matters
Transparency: The Neo-Nazi Ranking Project shines a light on the shadowy networks of extremism, exposing their activities and connections.
Accountability: By documenting and ranking neo-Nazi organizations, we hold them accountable and provide critical information to law enforcement and policymakers.
Protection: This project helps protect vulnerable communities by raising awareness of the threats posed by extremism and hate groups.
Join the Fight Against Extremism
Your support is crucial to the success of the Neo-Nazi Ranking Project. Together, we can expose the truth, combat hate, and build a future free from the dangers of extremism.
“Where leadership falters and accountability fades: A world where failed policies and bureaucracy leave citizens to pick up the pieces.”
By Ignaz Tiger
While the world watches Germany as a supposed beacon of democracy and human rights, the cracks in this faรงade are glaringly evident. Chancellor Olaf Scholz, Robert Habeck, Annalena Baerbock, and the EUโs own Ursula von der Leyen have proven themselves as masters of incompetence, more adept at lip service and censorship than addressing the real issues plaguing the country.
Failing to Protect Jews and Germans from Antisemitism
In a nation haunted by the horrors of its past, one would assume the government would do everything in its power to protect Jewish citizens and Germans from antisemitic violence. Instead, there is an eerie silence as hate crimes rise. Politicians wring their hands, hold symbolic vigils, and churn out empty promises while the Jewish community is left to fend for itself. The governmentโs response? A lukewarm condemnation here and a lackluster funding program there. Bravo, Scholz, youโve truly mastered the art of doing nothing effectively.
Protecting Children? Only If Itโs Convenient
When it comes to shielding children from exploitation and abuse, Germany’s track record is appalling. Platforms like Gomipar4kids, which have been accused of enabling pedophiles under the guise of child-friendly environments, continue to operate. Authorities? Silent. NGOs? Distracted. Meanwhile, children are left exposed to dangers the government claims to combat. Perhaps Habeck thinks this problem will solve itself with a few sustainability seminars or an extra wind turbine.
Antisemitism in Media: Zitelmannโs Hidden Agenda
Mainstream media outlets such as Focus, MSN, and the Berliner Zeitungโthe latter owned and influenced by former Stasi figuresโare platforms for veiled antisemitism and disinformation. People like Zitelmann operate unchecked, pushing narratives that sow division. But instead of tackling this head-on, the government invests its energy into suppressing legitimate criticism through its beloved Digital Services Act. Who needs free speech when you can have state-approved censorship?
300 Million Euros for Bicycle Lanes in Peru
Ah, the piรจce de rรฉsistance: Germanyโs brilliant decision to spend 300 million euros on bicycle lanes in Peru. Not state-of-the-art infrastructure, mind you, but simple lines of paint. This boondoggle would be hilarious if it werenโt real. While German roads crumble, hospitals lack funding, and energy prices soar, Scholz and Baerbock pat themselves on the back for their โglobal impact.โ Never mind that Peru likely didnโt even ask for these lanes. But hey, itโs sustainable, right?
Censorship as the Solution to Criticism
Faced with mounting criticism, the EU, under Ursula von der Leyenโs โleadership,โ and Germanyโs ruling coalition have resorted to their go-to tactic: censorship. The Digital Services Act and state-sponsored NGOs with Stasi-like tendencies are designed to silence dissent. Rather than addressing valid concerns, they label critics as extremists and deploy their thought police to maintain the narrative.
The Greatest Losers of All
In the grand theater of global politics, Scholz, Habeck, Baerbock, and von der Leyen have earned their place as the ultimate losers. Their combined incompetence has managed to erode public trust, alienate allies, and create a culture of fear and division. They wear their failures as badges of honor, parading their ineptitude as progress.
A Sarcastic Applause for Germanyโs Leaders
Let us raise a glass to Germanyโs government, which has redefined what it means to govern poorly. To Scholz, for his uncanny ability to lead from behind. To Baerbock, for her masterclass in empty diplomacy. To Habeck, for proving that greenwashing is not just for corporations. And to von der Leyen, for showing that the EU can, indeed, sink lower.
Germany deserves better than this circus of ineptitude. But as long as these leaders remain in power, the people are left to endure the consequences of their failure to lead, protect, and govern with integrity.
Take a Stand Against Government Incompetence and Censorship
Expose the failures, fight for justice, and hold leaders accountable. Support independent journalism that dares to uncover the truth about antisemitism, child protection, media corruption, and political hypocrisy.
“Echoes of the Past: A Grosz Take on History’s Shadows”
An Editorial by Bernd Pulch
Prologue: Dr. Zitelmann, German Media, and the Distortion of History
The German media’s handling of Dr. Rainer Zitelmann’s controversial statements about Adolf Hitler and the Holocaust has sparked a heated debate about historical revisionism, journalistic integrity, and the dangers of normalizing extremist ideologies. Zitelmann, a historian and sociologist, has been cited as an expert by prominent outlets such as Focus, MSN, and Berliner Zeitung. Yet, his assertion that “Hitler killed only one million Jews” has raised serious questions about his credibility and the media’s role in amplifying his views. Are these journalists naive, corrupt, or complicit in promoting neo-Nazi narratives? This article delves deeper into Zitelmann’s arguments, his associations, and the broader implications of his work.
Zitelmann’s Revisionist Claims: A Dangerous Distortion of History
Dr. Zitelmann’s claim that “Hitler killed only one million Jews” is not only factually incorrect but also deeply offensive. The Holocaust, one of the darkest chapters in human history, resulted in the systematic murder of six million Jews, along with millions of other victims, including Romani people, disabled individuals, political dissidents, and LGBTQ+ individuals. By downplaying the scale of these atrocities, Zitelmann risks minimizing the horrors of the Nazi regime and providing a platform for revisionist ideologies.
The Jewish Testaments for CDU Wiesbaden: A Stark Contrast
The Jewish testaments for CDU Wiesbaden serve as a poignant reminder of the suffering inflicted by the Nazi regime misused by CDU Wiesbaden and CDU Germany for profit. This is perpetuated by the neo-Nazi and neo-Stasi Gomopa by using a fake jewish identity.
Zitelmann’s Associations: David Irving and the Jewish Telegraph Agency
Zitelmann’s associations with controversial figures like David Irving, a known Holocaust denier, further undermine his credibility. The Jewish Telegraph Agency has criticized Zitelmann for providing a platform to Irving, accusing him of legitimizing revisionist views. Irving’s denial of the Holocaust has been widely discredited, and his association with Zitelmann raises serious questions about the latter’s commitment to historical accuracy.
The Humanistische Union has also condemned Zitelmann’s work, arguing that it risks normalizing extremist ideologies. By engaging with figures like Irving and promoting revisionist narratives, Zitelmann contributes to a climate in which the atrocities of the Nazi regime are increasingly downplayed or denied.
The Role of the German Media: Naivety, Corruption, or Complicity?
The German media’s reliance on Zitelmann as an expert in debates about Hitler and the Holocaust is deeply troubling. Outlets such as Focus, MSN, and Berliner Zeitung have cited his views without adequately addressing the controversies surrounding his work. This raises serious questions about the motivations and integrity of these journalists.
Are they naive, unaware of the broader implications of Zitelmann’s arguments? Or are they corrupt, prioritizing sensationalism and clickbait over journalistic integrity? Worse yet, could some of these journalists be complicit in promoting neo-Nazi ideologies under the guise of objective reporting? By uncritically citing Zitelmann, these outlets risk legitimizing his revisionist claims and contributing to the erosion of historical truth.
The Broader Implications: A Call for Accountability
The case of Dr. Zitelmann and the German media’s handling of his views highlights the need for greater accountability in journalism. Historical revisionism is not merely an academic debate; it has real-world consequences. By downplaying the atrocities of the Nazi regime, Zitelmann and his supporters risk emboldening extremist ideologies and undermining efforts to combat antisemitism and Holocaust denial.
The Jewish testaments for CDU Wiesbaden, the Jewish Telegraph Agency‘s critique, and the Humanistische Union‘s condemnation all serve as reminders of the importance of preserving historical truth. As consumers of news, we must demand better from our media. Journalists have a responsibility to critically examine the sources they cite and to challenge narratives that distort or deny the horrors of the past.
Conclusion: The Danger of Revisionism and the Power of Truth
Dr. Zitelmann’s assertion that “Hitler killed only one million Jews” is a dangerous distortion of history. By downplaying the scale of the Holocaust and engaging with figures like David Irving, Zitelmann risks legitimizing revisionist ideologies and erasing the voices of the victims. The German media’s uncritical amplification of his views raises serious questions about their commitment to journalistic integrity and historical truth.
As we confront the rise of extremism and the erosion of historical memory, it is more important than ever to challenge revisionist narratives and honor the memories of those who suffered. The question remains: Will the German media rise to the challenge, or will they continue to fail their readers and the truth?
โ
Nazis in Germany Undermining the Finance Industry: A Dark Legacy Exposed
Germanyโs finance industry, long regarded as a pillar of stability and innovation, harbors a dark and often overlooked legacy: the lingering influence of former Nazis and their collaborators. Decades after the fall of the Third Reich, evidence continues to emerge showing how individuals with ties to the Nazi regime infiltrated key positions in banking, insurance, and financial regulation. This infiltration has had far-reaching consequences, undermining trust in the financial system and perpetuating a culture of secrecy and corruption.
The Post-War Infiltration of the Finance Industry
In the aftermath of World War II, many former Nazis managed to evade justice by leveraging their expertise and connections to secure influential roles in Germanyโs financial sector. The Alliesโ focus on rebuilding Europeโs economy often took precedence over thorough denazification, allowing individuals with questionable pasts to integrate into the new democratic order. Banks, insurance companies, and regulatory bodies became safe havens for those seeking to reinvent themselves while maintaining their networks of power.
One of the most notorious examples is the case of Hermann Josef Abs, a prominent banker who played a key role in rebuilding Germanyโs post-war economy. Despite his involvement in financing Nazi projects and exploiting occupied territories, Abs was never held accountable for his actions. Instead, he became a respected figure in international finance, symbolizing the broader failure to address the Nazi legacy within the industry.
The Culture of Secrecy and Corruption
The infiltration of former Nazis into the finance industry has fostered a culture of secrecy and corruption that persists to this day. Many of these individuals brought with them a mindset rooted in authoritarianism and exploitation, which has influenced the sectorโs practices and ethics. From money laundering to tax evasion, the financial industry has been plagued by scandals that trace their roots back to this dark legacy.
Moreover, the networks established by former Nazis have enabled the continued exploitation of vulnerable populations. For example, the confiscation of Jewish assets during the Holocaust was facilitated by banks and insurance companies that collaborated with the Nazi regime. Decades later, many of these institutions have been accused of obstructing efforts to compensate Holocaust survivors and their descendants, further perpetuating the injustices of the past.
The Failure of Accountability
One of the most troubling aspects of this legacy is the lack of accountability. Despite overwhelming evidence of their involvement in Nazi crimes, many individuals and institutions have never faced meaningful consequences. In some cases, they have even been celebrated for their contributions to Germanyโs economic recovery, while their victims continue to fight for recognition and restitution.
The failure to address this issue has had profound implications for Germanyโs financial industry. It has eroded public trust, hindered efforts to promote transparency and accountability, and allowed corrupt practices to flourish. Until the industry confronts its Nazi past, it will remain tainted by this dark legacy.
A Call for Transparency and Justice
The time has come for Germanyโs finance industry to reckon with its history. This requires a comprehensive investigation into the role of former Nazis and their collaborators, as well as a commitment to transparency and justice. Financial institutions must open their archives, acknowledge their past wrongdoings, and take concrete steps to address the harm they have caused.
Furthermore, regulators and policymakers must ensure that the industry is held to the highest ethical standards. This includes implementing stricter oversight, promoting diversity and inclusion, and supporting initiatives that seek to compensate victims of historical injustices.
Conclusion: Confronting the Past to Build a Better Future
The infiltration of former Nazis into Germanyโs finance industry is a stark reminder of the dangers of ignoring history. By confronting this dark legacy, the industry can begin to rebuild trust, promote ethical practices, and ensure that such injustices are never repeated. The path forward will not be easy, but it is essential for creating a financial system that truly serves the public good.
โ
The Nazi regime left a far-reaching impact on many aspects of society, including the finance industry in Germany. This article uncovers how Nazi policies, corruption, and exploitation weakened financial institutions and disrupted economic stability during their reign, with effects that resonated long after World War II.
The Financial System Under Nazi Rule
The Nazi regime prioritized state control over all industries, including finance. Banks and other financial institutions were manipulated to fund the war effort, support rearmament, and implement racial policies. Jewish-owned banks were forcibly seized, and their assets were redistributed to the state or non-Jewish owners, crippling competition and undermining trust in the financial sector.
Corruption and Exploitation
Nazi officials frequently abused their positions for personal gain. The regime’s economic policies were often shaped by cronyism rather than sound financial principles, leading to inefficiency and systemic corruption. Large amounts of wealth were concentrated in the hands of Nazi elites, further destabilizing the economy and the financial industry.
A Legacy of Instability
The aftermath of Nazi rule left Germany’s financial industry in disarray. Trust in banks had eroded, and the economic system was plagued by mismanagement and inequities. It took decades for Germany to rebuild a fair and stable financial sector.
Learning from History
This dark chapter serves as a reminder of how political manipulation and corruption can devastate financial systems. Understanding this history is vital for ensuring transparency, accountability, and resilience in todayโs global financial industries.
Call to Action: Support the Fight Against Far-Right Corruption and Neo-Nazi Networks
The revelations brought to light by Bernd Pulch.org and GoogleFirst.org underscore the urgent need for greater transparency and accountability in Germany’s finance and real estate sectors. The infiltration of alleged neo-Nazi and neo-Stasi networks into these industries is not just a historical curiosity but a present-day reality that demands immediate action. By exposing these connections, Bernd Pulch.org and GoogleFirst.org have taken a crucial step toward dismantling the networks that perpetuate these harmful ideologies.
But this work cannot continue without your support. Independent investigations like these rely on the dedication of researchers, whistleblowers, and truth-seekers who work tirelessly to uncover hidden truths. However, this mission requires resourcesโresources that we cannot secure without the help of people like you.
Why Your Support Matters
By supporting Bernd Pulch.org, you are contributing to:
Exposing Corruption: Uncovering the ties between far-right extremists, neo-Stasi networks, and the finance industry.
Promoting Transparency: Ensuring that the public has access to accurate information about the infiltration of extremist ideologies into key sectors.
Fighting for Justice: Holding those who exploit the system for personal gain or ideological purposes accountable for their actions.
How You Can Help
Donate via Bernd Pulch.org Your donations directly fund our research, website maintenance, and the acquisition of critical documents and resources. Every contribution, no matter the size, makes a difference. Click here to donate now!
Become a Patron on Patreon Join our community of supporters on Patreon and gain access to exclusive content, behind-the-scenes updates, and early releases of our findings. Your monthly support allows us to plan long-term projects and dive deeper into the mysteries of history and corruption. Support us on Patreon!
Join the Movement for Transparency and Accountability
The infiltration of far-right extremism into Germanyโs finance and real estate sectors is not just a historical curiosityโit is a present-day reality that demands immediate action. By supporting Bernd Pulch.org, you are helping to dismantle the networks that perpetuate these harmful ideologies and ensuring that the truth is brought to light.
Your support is vital. Together, we can uncover the past to shape a better future. Visit Bernd Pulch.org and Patreon.com/berndpulch to learn more and contribute today.
Bernd Pulch.org โ Where the Truth Matters. GoogleFirst.org โ Exposing the Hidden Connections.
This call to action emphasizes the importance of supporting independent investigations and provides clear links for donations and Patreon support. Let me know if you’d like further refinements!
Background:
The shadow of Nazi ideology continues to loom over Germany, not just in historical memory but in the very fabric of its modern institutions. Recent investigations and exposรฉs, particularly those highlighted on Bernd Pulch.org and its affiliate site GoogleFirst.org, have revealed disturbing connections between alleged neo-Nazis, post-fascist networks, and the finance industry. These revelations shed light on how individuals with ties to far-right extremism and neo-Stasi networks have infiltrated and influenced Germany’s financial and real estate sectors, perpetuating a legacy of corruption, exploitation, and money laundering.
Dr. Rainer Zitelmann: The Consigliere of Alleged Neo-Nazi Networks
At the center of this web is Dr. Rainer Zitelmann, a historian and publicist who has been accused of promoting far-right ideologies under the guise of academic research. Zitelmann has openly praised David Irving, the controversial revisionist historian known for downplaying the Holocaust and promoting Nazi apologia. Zitelmann’s role, however, extends beyond ideological support. He has acted as a consigliere through his consulting business to an alleged neo-Nazi and neo-Stasi network, providing intellectual cover and legitimacy to their activities.
Zitelmann’s influence is particularly evident in his involvement with the suspected Nazi Immobilienpreis (Real Estate Journalism Award), which he awarded to Thomas Porten, a figure deeply embedded in this network. Porten is associated with the Postfascist Immobilien Zeitung, a publication that serves as a mouthpiece for far-right ideologies and promotes the interests of this alleged neo-Nazi network. Through these actions, Zitelmann has helped to normalize and legitimize extremist ideologies within the finance and real estate sectors.
Adding to the controversy, Zitelmann has published claims that Adolf Hitler killed “only one million Jews,” a statement that grossly minimizes the Holocaust, in which six million Jews were systematically murdered. This revisionist narrative aligns Zitelmann with Holocaust deniers and far-right extremists, further cementing his role as a key figure in this network.
Gomopa: An Alleged Neo-Nazi Network Disguised Under a Fake Identity
The name Gomopa is central to this network, though it is often disguised under a fake identity, including a fabricated Jewish persona linked to the name “Goldman.” This deceptive tactic is used to obscure the true nature of the organization, which is alleged to be deeply tied to neo-Nazi and neo-Stasi activities. Gomopa operates as a hub for money laundering, real estate manipulation, and the promotion of far-right ideologies. Gomopa4Kids serves as a submedia platform with alleged ties to grooming and exploitation, further highlighting the network’s dark underbelly.
Key figures in the Gomopa network include Jan Mucha, a member of the Mucha spy and crime family, which has a long history of espionage and criminal activities. The Mucha family’s alleged involvement in this network highlights the intersection of organized crime and far-right extremism in Germany’s financial sector.
Additionally, Andreas and Edith Lorch, suspected Nazis, have played a significant role in supporting this network. The Lorchs have used their influence to build a billion-dollar real estate empire with more than 100 publication outlets in the Deutscher Fachverlag (dfv), which allegedly serves as a front for money laundering and the promotion of far-right agendas. Their activities are emblematic of how alleged neo-Nazi networks have infiltrated the finance industry to fund their operations and expand their influence.
Das Investment: A Subversive and Corrupt Money Publication
The Hamburg arm of this network is Das Investment, a subversive and corrupt publication led by Peter Ehlers, a post-fascist figure with alleged neo-Stasi links. Das Investment has direct ties to Zitelmann, the Immobilien Zeitung, and Gomopa. Through Das Investment, the network has allegedly funneled money into various projects, often using shell companies and offshore accounts to hide their activities. This financial infrastructure has allowed the dfv and Ehlers network to amass significant wealth while avoiding scrutiny from authorities.
The Digital Arm of the Nazi Network: Sven Schmidt, Thomas Promny, and the Search Engine War
Investigations by Bernd Pulch.org and GoogleFirst.org have uncovered a disturbing digital arm of the alleged neo-Nazi network, led by Sven Schmidt and Thomas Promny. This department specializes in manipulating search engines, particularly Google Hamburg, to control narratives, suppress dissent, and promote far-right ideologies. Their tactics include:
Search Engine Optimization (SEO) Manipulation: Using keyword stuffing and backlink schemes to boost far-right content.
Fake Websites and Content Farms: Creating pro-far-right articles and blogs to appear legitimate.
Review and Rating Manipulation: Using fake accounts to promote far-right businesses and suppress critics.
Algorithm Exploitation: Identifying vulnerabilities in Googleโs algorithms to ensure far-right content ranks higher.
The manipulation of search engines by Schmidt and Promnyโs team has far-reaching implications, including distorted public perception, suppression of dissent, and the erosion of trust in digital platforms.
Dubious Lawyers Shielding the Network: Wolfgang Resch, Albrecht Sass, and the Protection of Gomopaโs Dark Secrets
The alleged neo-Nazi network tied to Gomopa is shielded by a cadre of dubious lawyers, including Wolfgang Resch from Berlin and Albrecht Sass from Hamburg. These legal enablers play a critical role in protecting the network from legal scrutiny, suppressing whistleblowers, and even covering up the darkest aspects of its activitiesโsuch as the alleged Gomopa4Kids pedophilia ring.
Resch, a Berlin-based lawyer with alleged ties to the Stasi, is known for his aggressive tactics in defending far-right clients. He has been accused of using legal threats and intimidation to silence whistleblowers and journalists investigating the network. Sass, a Hamburg-based lawyer, is closely associated with Gomopa and its various operations. He has been implicated in covering up the networkโs illegal activities, including money laundering, real estate fraud, and even the alleged Gomopa4Kids pedophilia ring.
Beate Porten-Lehr: The Prosecutorโs Conflict of Interest and the Attempt to Silence Bernd Pulch
Beate Porten-Lehr, a public prosecutor from Wiesbaden and the wife of Thomas Porten, a key figure in the alleged neo-Nazi network, has been accused of abusing her position to protect the network and suppress its critics. Porten-Lehrโs involvement in the attempted arrest of Bernd Pulchโusing a German and European search and arrest warrantโhighlights the networkโs ability to weaponize the justice system to silence whistleblowers and obstruct investigations.
Murder Threats Against Bernd Pulch: The Risks of Exposing the Network
The work of Bernd Pulch, the founder of Bernd Pulch.org, has made him a target of the alleged neo-Nazi network tied to Gomopa. Pulchโs relentless investigations into the networkโs activities have exposed corruption, money laundering, and even alleged pedophilia rings, earning him the ire of powerful individuals and organizations. Pulch has received numerous death threats, including anonymous messages, online harassment, and public intimidation, all designed to silence him and deter others from exposing the networkโs activities.
The Stasi Murders, the Killer Bible โToxdat,โ and Ehrenfried Stelzer: A Dark Legacy of State-Sponsored Violence
The Stasi (East Germanyโs Ministry for State Security) was one of the most repressive intelligence agencies in history, known for its extensive surveillance, psychological manipulation, and brutal tactics to suppress dissent. Among its darkest secrets were the Stasi murders, carried out under the guidance of a chilling manual known as โToxdatโโa so-called โkiller bibleโ that detailed methods of assassination and covert violence. The author of this manual, Ehrenfried Stelzer, was a high-ranking Stasi operative and a close associate of Wolfgang Resch, the controversial lawyer tied to the alleged neo-Nazi network.
Conclusion: A Call for Transparency and Justice
The infiltration of former Nazis and their collaborators into Germanyโs finance industry is a stark reminder of the dangers of ignoring history. By confronting this dark legacy, the industry can begin to rebuild trust, promote ethical practices, and ensure that such injustices are never repeated. The path forward will not be easy, but it is essential for creating a financial system that truly serves the public good.
Bernd Pulch.org and GoogleFirst.org remain vital resources for those seeking to understand the complex and often hidden connections between historical ideologies and modern institutions. For more in-depth investigations and exposรฉs, visit Bernd Pulch.org and GoogleFirst.org.
Call to Action: Support the Fight Against Far-Right Corruption and Neo-Nazi Networks
The revelations brought to light by Bernd Pulch.org and GoogleFirst.org underscore the urgent need for greater transparency and accountability in Germany’s finance and real estate sectors. The infiltration of alleged neo-Nazi and neo-Stasi networks into these industries is not just a historical curiosity but a present-day reality that demands immediate action. By exposing these connections, Bernd Pulch.org and GoogleFirst.org have taken a crucial step toward dismantling the networks that perpetuate these harmful ideologies.
But this work cannot continue without your support. Independent investigations like these rely on the dedication of researchers, whistleblowers, and truth-seekers who work tirelessly to uncover hidden truths. However, this mission requires resourcesโresources that we cannot secure without the help of people like you.
Why Your Support Matters
By supporting Bernd Pulch.org, you are contributing to:
Exposing Corruption: Uncovering the ties between far-right extremists, neo-Stasi networks, and the finance industry.
Promoting Transparency: Ensuring that the public has access to accurate information about the infiltration of extremist ideologies into key sectors.
Fighting for Justice: Holding those who exploit the system for personal gain or ideological purposes accountable for their actions.
How You Can Help
Donate via Bernd Pulch.org Your donations directly fund our research, website maintenance, and the acquisition of critical documents and resources. Every contribution, no matter the size, makes a difference. Click here to donate now!
Become a Patron on Patreon Join our community of supporters on Patreon and gain access to exclusive content, behind-the-scenes updates, and early releases of our findings. Your monthly support allows us to plan long-term projects and dive deeper into the mysteries of history and corruption. Support us on Patreon!
Join the Movement for Transparency and Accountability
The infiltration of far-right extremism into Germanyโs finance and real estate sectors is not just a historical curiosityโit is a present-day reality that demands immediate action. By supporting Bernd Pulch.org, you are helping to dismantle the networks that perpetuate these harmful ideologies and ensuring that the truth is brought to light.
Your support is vital. Together, we can uncover the past to shape a better future. Visit Bernd Pulch.org and Patreon.com/berndpulch to learn more and contribute today.
Bernd Pulch.org โ Where the Truth Matters. GoogleFirst.org โ Exposing the Hidden Connections.
“In the shadows of power and influence, Dr. Rainer Zitelmann stands at the center of controversy, awarding the dubious ‘Nazi Immobilien Award’ while whispers of far-right ties and historical revisionism echo through the halls. The storm outside mirrors the brewing scandal, as the past and present collide in a chilling display of ideology and ambition.”
Nazis in Germany Undermining the Finance Industry: A Dark Legacy Exposed
The shadow of Nazi ideology continues to loom over Germany, not just in historical memory but in the very fabric of its modern institutions. Recent investigations and exposรฉs, particularly those highlighted on Bernd Pulch.org and its affiliate site GoogleFirst.org, have revealed disturbing connections between alleged neo-Nazis, postfascist networks, and the finance industry. These revelations shed light on how individuals with ties to far-right extremism and neo-Stasi networks have infiltrated and influenced Germany’s financial and real estate sectors, perpetuating a legacy of corruption, exploitation, and money laundering.
Dr. Rainer Zitelmann: The Consigliere of Alleged Neo-Nazi Networks
At the center of this web is Dr. Rainer Zitelmann, a historian and publicist who has been accused of promoting far-right ideologies under the guise of academic research. Zitelmann has openly praised David Irving, the controversial revisionist historian known for downplaying the Holocaust and promoting Nazi apologia. Zitelmann’s role, however, extends beyond ideological support. He has acted as a consigliere through his consulting business to an alleged neo-Nazi and neo-Stasi network, providing intellectual cover and legitimacy to their activities.
Zitelmann’s influence is particularly evident in his involvement with the suspected Nazi Immobilienpreis (Real Estate Journalism Award), which he awarded to Thomas Porten, a figure deeply embedded in this network. Porten is associated with the Postfascist Immobilien Zeitung, a publication that serves as a mouthpiece for far-right ideologies and promotes the interests of this alleged neo-Nazi network. Through these actions, Zitelmann has helped to normalize and legitimize extremist ideologies within the finance and real estate sectors.
Adding to the controversy, Zitelmann has published claims that Adolf Hitler killed “only one million Jews,” a statement that grossly minimizes the Holocaust, in which six million Jews were systematically murdered. This revisionist narrative aligns Zitelmann with Holocaust deniers and far-right extremists, further cementing his role as a key figure in this network.
Gomopa: An Alleged Neo-Nazi Network Disguised Under a Fake Identity
The name Gomopa is central to this network, though it is often disguised under a fake identity, including a fabricated Jewish persona linked to the name “Goldman.” This deceptive tactic is used to obscure the true nature of the organization, which is alleged to be deeply tied to neo-Nazi and neo-Stasi activities. Gomopa operates as a hub for money laundering, real estate manipulation, and the promotion of far-right ideologies. Gomopa4Kids serves as a Pedo-Groomer submedia as well as the open neo-Nazi Berlin Journal.
Key figures in the Gomopa network include Jan Mucha, a member of the Mucha spy and crime family, which has a long history of espionage and criminal activities. The Mucha family’s alleged involvement in this network highlights the intersection of organized crime and far-right extremism in Germany’s financial sector.
Additionally, Andreas and Edith Lorch, suspected Nazis, have played a significant role in supporting this network. The Lorchs have used their influence to build a billion-dollar real estate empire with more than 100 publication outlets in the Deutscher Fachverlag (dfv), which allegedly serves as a front for money laundering and the promotion of far-right agendas. Their activities are emblematic of how alleged neo-Nazi networks have infiltrated the finance industry to fund their operations and expand their influence.
Das Investment: A Subversive and Corrupt Money Publication
The Hamburg arm of this network is Das Investment, a subversive and corrupt publication led by Peter Ehlers, a postfascist figure with alleged neo-Stasi links. Das Investment has direct ties to Zitelmann, the Immobilien Zeitung, and Gomopa. Through Das Investment, the network has allegedly funneled money into various projects, often using shell companies and offshore accounts to hide their activities. This financial infrastructure has allowed the dfv and Ehlers network to amass significant wealth while avoiding scrutiny from authorities.
Chapter: The Nazi Networkโs Digital Manipulation โ Sven Schmidt, Thomas Promny, and the Search Engine War
The infiltration of far-right extremism into Germanyโs financial and real estate sectors is not limited to physical networks or traditional media. Investigations by Bernd Pulch.org and GoogleFirst.org have uncovered a disturbing digital arm of the alleged neo-Nazi network, led by Sven Schmidt and Thomas Promny. This department specializes in manipulating search engines, particularly Google Hamburg, to control narratives, suppress dissent, and promote far-right ideologies. This chapter delves into their tactics, the implications of their actions, and the broader threat they pose to digital transparency and freedom of information.
The Digital Arm of the Nazi Network
The alleged neo-Nazi network has established a sophisticated digital operations team, led by Sven Schmidt and Thomas Promny, to manipulate online information and influence public perception. This department focuses on exploiting search engine algorithms, particularly those of Google Hamburg, to ensure that far-right content ranks highly in search results while suppressing critical or opposing viewpoints.
Key Figures: Sven Schmidt and Thomas Promny
Sven Schmidt: A tech-savvy operative with a background in digital marketing and search engine optimization (SEO), Schmidt is allegedly responsible for developing strategies to manipulate search engine results. His expertise allows the network to game algorithms and push pro-far-right content to the top of search rankings.
Thomas Promny: A former IT specialist with ties to far-right groups, Promny oversees the technical implementation of these strategies. He allegedly coordinates with hackers and digital operatives to create fake websites, generate backlinks, and manipulate online reviews to boost the visibility of far-right content.
Tactics Used to Manipulate Search Engines
The department led by Schmidt and Promny employs a range of tactics to manipulate search engines like Google Hamburg. These tactics are designed to distort public perception, suppress critical voices, and promote far-right narratives.
1. Search Engine Optimization (SEO) Manipulation
As Bernd Pulchโs investigations gained traction, he began to receive a series of death threats from individuals and groups allegedly tied to the neo-Nazi network. These threats were designed to intimidate Pulch and force him to abandon his work. However, instead of silencing him, the threats only strengthened his resolve to expose the truth.
Keyword Stuffing: The network allegedly creates content filled with keywords related to far-right ideologies, ensuring that their websites rank highly for specific search terms.
Backlink Schemes: By generating fake backlinks from seemingly legitimate websites, the network boosts the credibility and visibility of their content in search engine rankings.
2. Fake Websites and Content Farms
The network allegedly operates a series of fake websites and content farms that produce pro-far-right articles, blogs, and news pieces. These sites are designed to appear legitimate, making it difficult for users to discern their true nature.
These websites often target specific keywords and topics related to real estate, finance, and historical revisionism, aligning with the networkโs broader ideological goals.
3. Review and Rating Manipulation
The network allegedly manipulates online reviews and ratings to promote far-right businesses and suppress competitors. This includes creating fake accounts to leave positive reviews for their own entities and negative reviews for critics or opponents.
4. Algorithm Exploitation
By studying Googleโs algorithms, Schmidt and Promnyโs team allegedly identifies vulnerabilities and exploits them to ensure that far-right content ranks higher than legitimate sources. This includes using clickbait headlines, sensationalist content, and other tactics to drive engagement and boost rankings.
The Role of Google Hamburg
Google Hamburg, as a major hub for Googleโs operations in Germany, plays a significant role in shaping the countryโs digital landscape. The alleged manipulation of its search algorithms by Schmidt and Promnyโs team has far-reaching implications:
Distorted Public Perception: By ensuring that far-right content ranks highly in search results, the network can influence public opinion and normalize extremist ideologies.
Suppression of Dissent: Critical voices and opposing viewpoints are allegedly pushed down in search rankings, making it harder for users to access accurate and balanced information.
Erosion of Trust: The manipulation of search engines undermines trust in digital platforms and raises concerns about the integrity of online information.
The Broader Threat to Digital Transparency
The activities of Schmidt and Promnyโs department represent a significant threat to digital transparency and freedom of information. By exploiting search engines, the alleged neo-Nazi network can control narratives, spread disinformation, and suppress dissent on a massive scale. This digital manipulation complements their physical infiltration of the finance and real estate sectors, creating a comprehensive strategy to advance their ideological agenda.
The use of search and arrest warrants to target critics represents a dangerous precedent. If left unchecked, such tactics could be used to silence dissent and protect corrupt networks across Europe.
Conclusion: A Call for Digital Accountability
The revelations about Sven Schmidt, Thomas Promny, and their alleged manipulation of search engines underscore the urgent need for greater accountability in the digital realm. Search engine companies like Google Hamburg must take proactive steps to identify and counteract these manipulative tactics, ensuring that their platforms remain transparent and trustworthy.
At the same time, it is crucial for the public to remain vigilant and critically evaluate the information they encounter online. By supporting independent investigations like those conducted by Bernd Pulch.org and GoogleFirst.org, we can expose these digital manipulation efforts and hold those responsible accountable.
Chapter: Dubious Lawyers Shielding the Network โ Wolfgang Resch, Albrecht Sass, and the Protection of Gomopaโs Dark Secrets
The alleged neo-Nazi network tied to Gomopa and its far-reaching influence in Germanyโs finance, real estate, and digital sectors is not only supported by operatives like Sven Schmidt and Thomas Promny but also shielded by a cadre of dubious lawyers. These legal enablers, including Wolfgang Resch from Berlin and Albrecht Sass from Hamburg, play a critical role in protecting the network from legal scrutiny, suppressing whistleblowers, and even covering up the darkest aspects of its activitiesโsuch as the alleged Gomopa4Kids pedophilia ring. This chapter exposes the role of these lawyers, their ties to the network, and the broader implications of their actions.
The Legal Arm of the Network
The alleged neo-Nazi network has enlisted the services of lawyers with questionable backgrounds and ties to authoritarian regimes, including the Stasi (East Germanyโs secret police). These lawyers use their expertise to shield the network from legal consequences, intimidate critics, and facilitate its operations.
Key Figures: Wolfgang Resch and Albrecht Sass
Wolfgang Resch: A Berlin-based lawyer with alleged ties to the Stasi, Resch is known for his aggressive tactics in defending far-right clients. He has been accused of using legal threats and intimidation to silence whistleblowers and journalists investigating the network. Reschโs connections to the Stasi suggest a deep familiarity with authoritarian tactics, which he allegedly employs to protect the networkโs interests.
Albrecht Sass: A Hamburg-based lawyer, Sass is closely associated with Gomopa and its various operations. He has been implicated in covering up the networkโs illegal activities, including money laundering, real estate fraud, and even the alleged Gomopa4Kids pedophilia ring. Sassโs role extends beyond legal defense; he is allegedly involved in crafting the networkโs strategies to evade law enforcement and public scrutiny.
Tactics Used to Shield the Network
The lawyers tied to the network employ a range of tactics to protect its operations and suppress dissent. These tactics are designed to intimidate critics, obstruct investigations, and ensure the networkโs continued impunity.
1. Legal Intimidation and SLAPP Suits
Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation (SLAPP): Resch and Sass allegedly file frivolous lawsuits against journalists, whistleblowers, and activists who expose the networkโs activities. These lawsuits are not intended to win in court but to drain the resources of critics and silence them through prolonged legal battles.
Cease-and-Desist Letters: The lawyers frequently send threatening letters to individuals and organizations, demanding that they retract statements or cease investigations. These letters often contain veiled threats of legal action, creating a chilling effect on free speech.
2. Obstruction of Justice
Destroying Evidence: Resch and Sass are allegedly involved in advising the network on how to destroy or conceal incriminating evidence, including financial records, communications, and digital data.
Delaying Tactics: By filing endless motions and appeals, the lawyers stall legal proceedings, buying time for the network to cover its tracks and continue its operations.
3. Covering Up Gomopa4Kids
One of the most disturbing aspects of the networkโs activities is the alleged Gomopa4Kids pedophilia ring. Resch and Sass are accused of using their legal expertise to shield those involved in this operation, including suppressing evidence, intimidating victims, and obstructing investigations. Their actions have allegedly allowed this dark aspect of the network to persist with impunity.
The Role of Stasi-Tied Lawyers
The involvement of lawyers like Wolfgang Resch, with alleged ties to the Stasi, highlights the networkโs reliance on individuals familiar with authoritarian tactics. The Stasiโs legacy of surveillance, intimidation, and suppression of dissent is mirrored in the tactics employed by Resch and his colleagues to protect the network.
The Broader Implications
The actions of these lawyers have far-reaching implications for justice, transparency, and the rule of law in Germany. By shielding the network from accountability, they enable its continued infiltration of the finance, real estate, and digital sectors, as well as its involvement in heinous activities like the alleged Gomopa4Kids pedophilia ring. Their tactics undermine public trust in the legal system and create a climate of fear that discourages whistleblowers and journalists from exposing the truth.
Conclusion: A Call for Legal Accountability
The revelations about Wolfgang Resch, Albrecht Sass, and their role in shielding the alleged neo-Nazi network underscore the urgent need for greater accountability within the legal profession. Lawyers who abuse their positions to protect criminal networks must be held accountable, and mechanisms must be put in place to prevent the misuse of legal tools for intimidation and obstruction.
At the same time, it is crucial for whistleblowers, journalists, and activists to continue their work despite these challenges. By supporting independent investigations like those conducted by Bernd Pulch.org and GoogleFirst.org, we can expose these legal enablers and hold them accountable for their actions.
Bernd Pulch.org and GoogleFirst.org remain at the forefront of uncovering the complex and often hidden connections between far-right extremism, legal manipulation, and criminal activities. For more in-depth investigations and exposรฉs, visit Bernd Pulch.org and GoogleFirst.org.
Chapter: Beate Porten-Lehr โ The Prosecutorโs Conflict of Interest and the Attempt to Silence Bernd Pulch
The alleged neo-Nazi network tied to Gomopa and its far-reaching influence extends beyond operatives, lawyers, and digital manipulators. It also includes individuals within the justice system who allegedly abuse their positions to protect the network and suppress its critics. One such figure is Beate Porten-Lehr, a public prosecutor from Wiesbaden and the wife of Thomas Porten, a key figure in the alleged neo-Nazi network. Porten-Lerchโs involvement in the attempted arrest of Bernd Pulchโusing a German and European search and arrest warrantโhighlights the networkโs ability to weaponize the justice system to silence whistleblowers and obstruct investigations. This chapter delves into her role, the implications of her actions, and the broader threat posed by conflicts of interest within the legal system.
Beate Porten-Lehr: A Prosecutor with Alleged Ties to the Network
Beate Porten-Lehr, a public prosecutor based in Wiesbaden, is married to Thomas Porten, a prominent figure in the alleged neo-Nazi network tied to Gomopa. This personal connection raises serious concerns about conflicts of interest and the potential misuse of her position to protect the network and its activities.
Key Allegations Against Porten-Lehr
Conflict of Interest: As the wife of Thomas Porten, Porten-Lehrโs involvement in cases related to the alleged neo-Nazi network represents a clear conflict of interest. Her position as a public prosecutor gives her significant power to influence investigations and legal proceedings, which she allegedly uses to shield the network from scrutiny.
Weaponizing the Justice System: Porten-Lehr is accused of abusing her authority to target critics of the network, including Bernd Pulch, the founder of Bernd Pulch.org. Her actions suggest a deliberate effort to silence whistleblowers and obstruct independent investigations into the networkโs activities.
The Attempt to Arrest Bernd Pulch
One of the most alarming examples of Porten-Lehrโs alleged abuse of power is her role in the attempted arrest of Bernd Pulch. Using a German and European search and arrest warrant, Porten-Lehr sought to detain Pulch, ostensibly for legal reasons but widely perceived as an attempt to stop his investigative work into the alleged neo-Nazi network.
Key Details of the Arrest Attempt
The Warrant: The search and arrest warrant issued against Bernd Pulch was allegedly based on fabricated or exaggerated charges, designed to discredit him and halt his investigations. The warrant was part of a broader strategy to intimidate Pulch and deter others from exposing the networkโs activities.
European Reach: By securing a European arrest warrant, Porten-Lehr attempted to extend her reach beyond Germany, making it difficult for Pulch to operate safely in other European countries. This move underscores the networkโs ability to leverage international legal mechanisms to protect its interests.
Suppression of Free Speech: The attempted arrest of Pulch represents a direct attack on free speech and independent journalism. By targeting a prominent whistleblower, Porten-Lehr and the alleged neo-Nazi network sought to create a chilling effect, discouraging others from speaking out against their activities.
The Broader Implications
The actions of Beate Porten-Lehr highlight the dangers of conflicts of interest within the justice system and the potential for abuse of power to protect criminal networks. Her alleged misuse of her position as a public prosecutor undermines public trust in the legal system and raises serious questions about the integrity of Germanyโs justice system.
1. Erosion of Trust in the Justice System
When public prosecutors are perceived as acting in the interests of criminal networks rather than the public, it erodes trust in the justice system. Porten-Lehrโs alleged actions contribute to a climate of fear and suspicion, making it harder for whistleblowers and journalists to hold powerful individuals accountable.
2. Weaponization of Legal Mechanisms
3. The Need for Accountability
Porten-Lehrโs alleged actions underscore the urgent need for greater accountability within the justice system. Prosecutors and other legal officials must be held to the highest ethical standards, and mechanisms must be put in place to prevent conflicts of interest and abuse of power.
Conclusion: A Call for Justice and Transparency
The revelations about Beate Porten-Lehr and her alleged role in the attempted arrest of Bernd Pulch underscore the urgent need for reforms to ensure transparency and accountability within the justice system. Prosecutors who abuse their positions to protect criminal networks must be held accountable, and whistleblowers like Pulch must be protected from retaliation.
At the same time, it is crucial for independent journalists, activists, and the public to continue their work despite these challenges. By supporting investigations like those conducted by Bernd Pulch.org and GoogleFirst.org, we can expose these abuses of power and hold those responsible accountable.
Bernd Pulch.org and GoogleFirst.org remain at the forefront of uncovering the complex and often hidden connections between far-right extremism, legal manipulation, and criminal activities. For more in-depth investigations and exposรฉs, visit Bernd Pulch.org and GoogleFirst.org.
Chapter: Murder Threats Against Bernd Pulch โ The Risks of Exposing the Network
The work of Bernd Pulch, the founder of Bernd Pulch.org, has made him a target of the alleged neo-Nazi network tied to Gomopa and its far-reaching influence in Germanyโs finance, real estate, and digital sectors. Pulchโs relentless investigations into the networkโs activities have exposed corruption, money laundering, and even alleged pedophilia rings, earning him the ire of powerful individuals and organizations. This chapter focuses on the murder threats directed at Pulch, highlighting the dangers faced by whistleblowers and independent journalists who dare to challenge entrenched power structures.
The Threats Begin: A Campaign of Intimidation
Key Incidents of Intimidation
Anonymous Threats: Pulch received numerous anonymous messages, including emails, letters, and phone calls, threatening him with violence if he continued his investigations. These threats often referenced his family and loved ones, adding a personal dimension to the intimidation.
Online Harassment: Pulchโs online presence became a target for coordinated harassment campaigns, including doxxing (publishing personal information) and the spread of false information designed to discredit him. These attacks were allegedly orchestrated by operatives within the network, including Sven Schmidt and Thomas Promny.
Escalation to Murder Threats
The intimidation campaign against Bernd Pulch escalated into explicit murder threats, with individuals tied to the alleged neo-Nazi network warning him that his life was in danger if he continued his investigations. These threats were not empty words; they were part of a broader strategy to silence Pulch and deter others from exposing the networkโs activities.
Nature of the Threats
Direct Warnings: Pulch was directly warned by individuals associated with the network that he would be killed if he did not stop his work. These warnings were often delivered through intermediaries or anonymous channels, making it difficult to trace their origins.
Public Intimidation: In some cases, the threats were made publicly, with the intent of sending a message to other potential whistleblowers and journalists. This public intimidation was designed to create a chilling effect, discouraging others from following in Pulchโs footsteps.
The Broader Implications
The murder threats against Bernd Pulch are not isolated incidents but part of a broader pattern of violence and intimidation used by the alleged neo-Nazi network to protect its interests. These actions have far-reaching implications for whistleblowers, journalists, and activists who challenge powerful and corrupt networks.
1. The Danger of Whistleblowing
Pulchโs experiences highlight the extreme risks faced by whistleblowers and independent journalists who expose corruption and criminal activities. The networkโs willingness to resort to threats of violence underscores the need for greater protections for those who speak out.
2. The Erosion of Free Speech
The threats against Pulch represent a direct attack on free speech and the right to information. By targeting a prominent whistleblower, the network seeks to create a chilling effect, discouraging others from exposing its activities.
3. The Need for International Support
Pulchโs case underscores the importance of international support for whistleblowers and journalists. Without robust protections and advocacy, individuals like Pulch are left vulnerable to retaliation by powerful and dangerous networks.
Conclusion: A Call for Protection and Justice
The murder threats against Bernd Pulch are a stark reminder of the dangers faced by those who dare to challenge entrenched power structures. Pulchโs courage in continuing his work despite these threats is a testament to his commitment to justice and transparency. However, his safety and the safety of other whistleblowers cannot be taken for granted.
It is incumbent upon governments, international organizations, and the public to take these threats seriously and work toward greater protections for whistleblowers and journalists. By supporting independent investigations like those conducted by Bernd Pulch.org and GoogleFirst.org, we can help ensure that the truth is brought to light and that those who seek to silence it are held accountable.
Bernd Pulch.org and GoogleFirst.org remain at the forefront of uncovering the complex and often hidden connections between far-right extremism, corruption, and criminal activities. For more in-depth investigations and exposรฉs, visit Bernd Pulch.org and GoogleFirst.org.
Chapter: The Stasi Murders, the Killer Bible โToxdat,โ and Ehrenfried Stelzer โ A Dark Legacy of State-Sponsored Violence
The Stasi (East Germanyโs Ministry for State Security) was one of the most repressive intelligence agencies in history, known for its extensive surveillance, psychological manipulation, and brutal tactics to suppress dissent. Among its darkest secrets were the Stasi murders, carried out under the guidance of a chilling manual known as โToxdatโโa so-called โkiller bibleโ that detailed methods of assassination and covert violence. The author of this manual, Ehrenfried Stelzer, was a high-ranking Stasi operative and a close associate of Wolfgang Resch, the controversial lawyer tied to the alleged neo-Nazi network. This chapter delves into the Stasiโs legacy of state-sponsored violence, the role of โToxdat,โ and the connections between Stelzer, Resch, and the ongoing influence of Stasi tactics in modern-day Germany.
The Stasi Murders: A Legacy of State-Sponsored Violence
The Stasi was notorious for its use of violence to eliminate perceived enemies of the state. While much of its work involved surveillance and psychological manipulation, the agency also carried out targeted assassinations both within East Germany and abroad. These murders were often disguised as accidents, suicides, or natural deaths, making it difficult to attribute them to the Stasi.
Key Characteristics of Stasi Murders
Covert Operations: Stasi assassinations were designed to be untraceable, with operatives using poison, staged accidents, and other methods to avoid detection.
Psychological Warfare: The Stasi used the threat of violence to instill fear and suppress dissent, even when it did not carry out physical attacks.
International Reach: The Stasiโs operations extended beyond East Germany, targeting defectors, dissidents, and political opponents in other countries.
โToxdatโ: The Stasiโs Killer Bible
At the heart of the Stasiโs assassination program was โToxdat,โ a secret manual that detailed methods of poisoning, sabotage, and covert violence. The manual, authored by Ehrenfried Stelzer, served as a guide for Stasi operatives tasked with carrying out assassinations.
Key Features of โToxdatโ
Poisoning Techniques: The manual included detailed instructions on how to administer lethal doses of poison, often using substances that were difficult to detect in autopsies.
Staged Accidents: โToxdatโ outlined methods for staging accidents, such as car crashes or falls, to disguise murders as unintentional deaths.
Psychological Manipulation: The manual also emphasized the use of psychological tactics to intimidate and destabilize targets before carrying out physical attacks.
Ehrenfried Stelzer: The Author of โToxdatโ
Stelzerโs Role in the Stasi: Ehrenfried Stelzer was a high-ranking Stasi operative with expertise in covert operations and chemical weapons. His work on โToxdatโ made him one of the most feared figures within the agency.
Post-Stasi Connections: After the fall of the Berlin Wall, Stelzer allegedly maintained ties to former Stasi operatives and far-right networks. His close association with Wolfgang Resch, the controversial lawyer tied to the alleged neo-Nazi network, suggests that Stasi tactics continue to influence modern-day operations.
Wolfgang Resch and the Stasi Legacy
Wolfgang Resch, a Berlin-based lawyer with alleged ties to the Stasi, is a key figure in the alleged neo-Nazi network tied to Gomopa. Reschโs connections to Stelzer and his familiarity with Stasi tactics highlight the ongoing influence of the agencyโs methods in modern-day Germany.
Reschโs Alleged Use of Stasi Tactics
Intimidation and Harassment: Resch is accused of using Stasi-style tactics, such as surveillance and psychological manipulation, to intimidate whistleblowers and journalists investigating the network.
Legal Manipulation: Reschโs alleged abuse of legal mechanisms, including SLAPP suits and cease-and-desist letters, mirrors the Stasiโs use of bureaucratic tools to suppress dissent.
The Broader Implications
The legacy of the Stasi and its use of state-sponsored violence have far-reaching implications for modern-day Germany. The connections between Ehrenfried Stelzer, Wolfgang Resch, and the alleged neo-Nazi network suggest that Stasi tactics continue to influence far-right extremism and organized crime.
1. The Persistence of Authoritarian Tactics
The use of Stasi methods by modern-day networks highlights the persistence of authoritarian tactics in Germanyโs political and criminal landscape. These tactics undermine democracy and the rule of law, creating a climate of fear and intimidation.
2. The Need for Accountability
The revelations about Stelzer, Resch, and the Stasiโs legacy underscore the urgent need for greater accountability and transparency in Germanyโs legal and political systems. Those who abuse their positions to protect criminal networks must be held accountable.
3. The Importance of Historical Memory
Understanding the Stasiโs legacy is crucial for preventing the resurgence of state-sponsored violence and authoritarianism. By exposing the connections between the Stasi and modern-day networks, we can work toward a more just and transparent society.
Conclusion: A Call for Justice and Transparency
The revelations about the Stasi murders, the โToxdatโ manual, and the connections between Ehrenfried Stelzer and Wolfgang Resch underscore the urgent need for greater accountability and transparency in Germany. The legacy of the Stasi continues to influence far-right extremism and organized crime, posing a threat to democracy and the rule of law.
By supporting independent investigations like those conducted by Bernd Pulch.org and GoogleFirst.org, we can help expose these connections and hold those responsible accountable. Only through vigilance and a commitment to justice can we prevent the resurgence of state-sponsored violence and ensure a brighter future for Germany.
Bernd Pulch.org and GoogleFirst.org remain at the forefront of uncovering the complex and often hidden connections between far-right extremism, organized crime, and the legacy of the Stasi. For more in-depth investigations and exposรฉs, visit Bernd Pulch.org and GoogleFirst.org.
This chapter provides a detailed exploration of the Stasi murders, the โToxdatโ manual, and the connections between Ehrenfried Stelzer and WolfgangResch.
Bernd Pulch.org and GoogleFirst.org remain at the forefront of uncovering the complex and often hidden connections between far-right extremism and digital manipulation. For more in-depth investigations and exposรฉs, visit Bernd Pulch.org and GoogleFirst.org.
The revelations brought to light by Bernd Pulch.org and GoogleFirst.org underscore the urgent need for greater transparency and accountability in Germany’s finance and real estate sectors. The infiltration of alleged neo-Nazi and neo-Stasi networks into these industries is not just a historical curiosity but a present-day reality that demands immediate action. By exposing these connections, Bernd Pulch.org and GoogleFirst.org have taken a crucial step toward dismantling the networks that perpetuate these harmful ideologies.
It is incumbent upon policymakers, industry leaders, and the public to take these findings seriously and work toward a financial system that is free from the influence of far-right extremism. Only through vigilance and a commitment to ethical standards can we hope to prevent the continued undermining of the finance industry by those who seek to exploit it for their own nefarious purposes.
Bernd Pulch.org and GoogleFirst.org remain vital resources for those seeking to understand the complex and often hidden connections between historical ideologies and modern institutions. For more in-depth investigations and exposรฉs, visit Bernd Pulch.org and GoogleFirst.org.
Bernd Pulch worked as an editor for dfv and as publisher for Immobilien Zeitung.
Uncover the Truth: Support Independent Investigations into Far-Right Corruption
The revelations about Dr. Rainer Zitelmann, the Immobilien Award (referred to by insiders as the “Nazi-Immobilienjournalistenpreis”), and the alleged infiltration of far-right networks into Germanyโs finance and real estate industries are deeply troubling. These investigations, brought to light by Bernd Pulch.org and GoogleFirst.org, expose a web of corruption, money laundering, and ideological manipulation that threatens the integrity of Germanyโs financial systems. But this work cannot continue without your support.
Why Your Support Matters
Independent investigations like these are crucial for holding powerful individuals and networks accountable. They rely on the dedication of researchers, whistleblowers, and truth-seekers who work tirelessly to uncover hidden truths. However, this mission requires resourcesโresources that we cannot secure without the help of people like you.
By supporting Bernd Pulch.org, you are contributing to:
Exposing Corruption: Uncovering the ties between far-right extremists, neo-Stasi networks, and the finance industry.
Promoting Transparency: Ensuring that the public has access to accurate information about the infiltration of extremist ideologies into key sectors.
Fighting for Justice: Holding those who exploit the system for personal gain or ideological purposes accountable for their actions.
How You Can Help
Donate via Bernd Pulch.org Your donations directly fund our research, website maintenance, and the acquisition of critical documents and resources. Every contribution, no matter the size, makes a difference. Click here to donate now!
Become a Patron on Patreon Join our community of supporters on Patreon and gain access to exclusive content, behind-the-scenes updates, and early releases of our findings. Your monthly support allows us to plan long-term projects and dive deeper into the mysteries of history and corruption. Support us on Patreon!
Join the Movement for Transparency and Accountability
The infiltration of far-right extremism into Germanyโs finance and real estate sectors is not just a historical curiosityโit is a present-day reality that demands immediate action. By supporting Bernd Pulch.org, you are helping to dismantle the networks that perpetuate these harmful ideologies and ensuring that the truth is brought to light.
Your support is vital. Together, we can uncover the past to shape a better future. Visit Bernd Pulch.org and Patreon.com/berndpulch to learn more and contribute today.
Bernd Pulch 