โœŒTop 100 Most Absurd Green Bonds & ESG Debt Instruments Ever Issued๐Ÿ‘Œ

“A satirical depiction of the absurdity of greenwashing, where green bonds float over a polluted city, promising sustainability while funding environmentally harmful projects. A colorful critique of the worldโ€™s most absurd ESG investments.”

Methodology for the โ€œTop 100 Most Absurd Green Bonds & ESG Debt Instrumentsโ€ Ranking

This satirical yet data-informed ranking was compiled using the following criteria:

  1. Contradictory Use of Funds: Projects labeled “green” or “sustainable” that finance clearly environmentally destructive, socially harmful, or ethically dubious activities โ€” e.g., oil pipelines, deforestation-linked agriculture, or weapons manufacturers.
  2. Greenwashing Language: Bonds marketed with excessive ESG jargon, where the fine print reveals little to no actual sustainability impact, or where environmental terms are used purely as branding tools.
  3. Corporate Reputation Mismatch: Issuers with a track record of human rights violations, environmental pollution, or fraud issuing “green” debt instruments with minimal accountability or transparency.
  4. Rating & Certification Farces: Deals that obtained ESG certifications (e.g., from second-party opinion providers or rating agencies) despite obviously violating the spirit of sustainability.
  5. Lack of Measurable Impact: Instruments with no clear metrics, benchmarks, or oversight mechanisms to track the promised positive outcomes.
  6. Public Scandal or Backlash: Bonds or funds that sparked protests, legal challenges, or media exposure for ESG-related hypocrisy.

Sources include: international financial news reports, NGO audits, ESG watchdog databases, investment prospectuses, and expert analyses from the sustainability finance space.


Here are entries 1 to 20 of the Top 100 Most Absurd Green Bonds & ESG Debt Instruments Ever Issued:


1. PetroAmazonas โ€œSustainable Extractionโ€ Bond (Ecuador)
Marketed as โ€œeco-friendly oil drilling,โ€ this bond funded operations in the Amazon rainforestโ€”literally destroying biodiversity while using ESG buzzwords.

2. Gazprom โ€œClean Energy Transitionโ€ Bond (Russia)
A green bond for expanding natural gas pipelines through fragile ecosystems. Emissions? Nyet, just ignore them.

3. Saudi Aramco โ€œGreen Growthโ€ Sukuk (Saudi Arabia)
Labeled sustainable for efficiency upgradesโ€”on oil rigs. Yes, the worldโ€™s top oil exporter went green… on paper.

4. Adani Group โ€œGreen Infrastructure Bondโ€ (India)
Backed by a conglomerate expanding coal mining. It claimed ESG alignment by promising to plant trees somewhere, someday.

5. ExxonMobil โ€œLow Carbon Energyโ€ Note (USA)
A โ€œgreenโ€ issuance tied to a refinery upgrade project โ€” which increased capacity and emissions.

6. China Three Gorges Corporation โ€œSustainable Hydropowerโ€ Bond
Funded dam construction that displaced entire villages and destroyed river ecosystems.

7. TotalEnergies โ€œBiodiversity Protection Bondโ€ (France)
Issued after oil spills, this bond claimed to offset destruction with vague conservation fundingโ€”never independently verified.

8. Chevron โ€œCarbon Efficiencyโ€ Note (USA)
Promised โ€œlower emissions per barrelโ€ as it opened a new offshore drilling site.

9. Lukoil โ€œRenewable Transitionโ€ Bond (Russia)
Spent over 90% on fossil fuel infrastructure under the excuse of improving energy efficiency.

10. Shell โ€œSustainable Development Goalsโ€ Linked Bond (Netherlands/UK)
Cynically tied to UN goals while continuing Arctic drilling.

11. CNPC โ€œGreen Refineryโ€ Bond (China)
Backed a refinery modernization projectโ€”increasing output and COโ‚‚ emissions.

12. Halliburton โ€œESG Leadershipโ€ Bond (USA)
Issued after PR scandals, this bond funded pipeline services with vague ESG claims and no metrics.

13. Rio Tinto โ€œSocial Sustainabilityโ€ Note (UK/Australia)
Issued just months after destroying an Aboriginal heritage site in Juukan Gorge.

14. Glencore โ€œResponsible Miningโ€ Green Bond (Switzerland)
Labeled ESG-friendly while financing cobalt extraction linked to child labor in the DRC.

15. Enbridge โ€œGreen Infrastructureโ€ Bond (Canada)
Financed a pipeline through Indigenous lands while promoting it as a low-emissions project.

16. BP โ€œClean Futureโ€ Bond (UK)
Spent majority on PR campaigns and minimal amounts on solar R&D.

17. ENI โ€œCarbon Mitigation Bondโ€ (Italy)
Issued while doubling down on new offshore drilling blocks.

18. Equinor โ€œSustainable Transitionโ€ Note (Norway)
Used to fund controversial Arctic oil projects with โ€œnet-zero ambitionโ€ marketing.

19. Coal India โ€œGreen Transformationโ€ Bond
Yes, a coal giant issued a green bond. Claimed it was for dust control at coal mines.

20. Deutsche Bank โ€œESG Pioneerโ€ Structured Note (Germany)
Backed an index full of fossil fuel and defense contractorsโ€”branded as โ€œgreen tech.โ€


Here are entries 21 to 40 of the Top 100 Most Absurd Green Bonds & ESG Debt Instruments Ever Issued:


21. Rosneft โ€œEco-Energyโ€ Bond (Russia)
Labeled green for โ€œreducing flaringโ€ while funding deep Arctic oil drilling. Carbon-neutral gaslighting at its finest.

22. Bayer โ€œSustainable Agricultureโ€ Bond (Germany)
Issued post-Monsanto merger, it financed GMO promotion and glyphosate-heavy farming.

23. BHP โ€œGreen Transitionโ€ Note (Australia/UK)
Claimed to fund renewable energy for mining operationsโ€”still led to massive deforestation and water use.

24. North Dakota โ€œGreen Frackingโ€ Muni Bond (USA)
Local government-issued debt to support โ€œefficientโ€ hydraulic fracturing. Frack responsibly?

25. Petrobras โ€œEco-Resilienceโ€ Bond (Brazil)
Labeled as sustainable despite funding offshore rigs near marine biodiversity hotspots.

26. Coal Ministry of India โ€œEnvironmental Modernization Bondโ€
Used to buy newer coal trucks and sprinklers. Still coal. Still absurd.

27. Nestlรฉ โ€œSustainable Water Useโ€ Bond (Switzerland)
After scandals over water privatization, this bond funded water extraction plants. โ€œGreenโ€ for filtering before bottling.

28. Vietnam State Bank โ€œEco-Industry Development Bondโ€
Issued to boost manufacturing in โ€œspecial economic zonesโ€โ€”with relaxed environmental oversight.

29. Palantir โ€œEthical AIโ€ ESG Note (USA)
Claimed ESG compliance despite massive controversy over surveillance tools and military contracts.

30. Egypt โ€œGreen Pyramidโ€ Infrastructure Bond
Included projects that involved desert road construction over protected habitats. Literal greenwashing in the sand.

31. JPMorgan Chase โ€œESG Leadershipโ€ Note (USA)
Touted for impact investing. Top holdings? Oil, weapons, and private prisons.

32. Qatar Petroleum โ€œGreen LNGโ€ Bond
Marketed liquefied natural gas as a bridge to renewables while expanding fossil infrastructure.

33. Uganda โ€œSustainable Growthโ€ Bond
Used to back Chinese-built oil pipelines with no credible environmental oversight.

34. Malaysia โ€œPalm Oil Sustainabilityโ€ Sukuk
Claimed to promote โ€œsustainableโ€ palm oil. Backed companies fined for illegal deforestation.

35. Shell Nigeria โ€œCommunity Engagementโ€ Bond
Used ESG language while linked to major oil spills and displacement lawsuits.

36. HSBC โ€œLow Carbon Transitionโ€ Note (UK)
Portfolio included cement, airlines, and fossil fuels. Somehow still passed ESG screens.

37. TotalEnergies โ€œGreen Africaโ€ Development Bond
Tied to pipeline development in Uganda and Tanzania. Community protests ensued.

38. Morocco โ€œGreen Desertโ€ Solar Bond
Funded solar projects tied to water-intensive mega-farming operations.

39. Boeing โ€œESG Aerospace Innovationโ€ Bond (USA)
Claimed to innovate for the planet… while investing in new fighter jets.

40. Tesla โ€œCarbon-Neutral Innovationโ€ Bond (USA)
Backed gigafactory expansions with dubious lithium sourcing in Indigenous territories.


Here are entries 41 to 60 of the Top 100 Most Absurd Green Bonds & ESG Debt Instruments Ever Issued:


41. Abu Dhabi โ€œNet Zeroโ€ Sovereign Green Bond
Marketed as climate-positive while backing oil infrastructure โ€œefficiency upgrades.โ€ Desert mirage economics.

42. Indian Railways โ€œSustainable Transportโ€ Bond
Heavily used to electrify lines serving coal transport corridors. Powered by coal, of course.

43. Amazon.com โ€œClimate Pledgeโ€ Note (USA)
Used to fund electric delivery vansโ€”while maintaining massive emissions through data centers and air freight.

44. Nigeria โ€œGreen Growthโ€ Sovereign Bond
Tied to infrastructure that directly enabled oil and gas extraction expansion.

45. Barclays โ€œResponsible Bankingโ€ ESG Note (UK)
Packed with fossil fuel and arms industry clients. Just… responsibly.

46. Fortescue Metals โ€œGreen Miningโ€ Bond (Australia)
Supported expansion of iron ore mines under the guise of โ€œclean steelโ€ pathways.

47. Ukrainian Government โ€œWar Recovery Green Bondโ€
Some proceeds funneled to rebuild gas and coal plantsโ€”framed as eco-recovery.

48. Philippine โ€œTyphoon Recoveryโ€ ESG Bond
Marketed as climate response. Spent on roads and infrastructure that worsened environmental degradation.

49. Bayer-Monsanto โ€œClimate-Resilient Agricultureโ€ Bond
Funded seeds and pesticides accused of harming pollinators and soil integrity.

50. Russiaโ€™s Ministry of Finance โ€œGreen Infrastructureโ€ Bond
Built roads and gas pipelines in the name of โ€œimproved energy efficiency.โ€

51. Volkswagen โ€œClean Driveโ€ ESG Note (Germany)
Issued post-emissions scandal, with no third-party oversight. Just trust them this time.

52. GDF Suez/Engie โ€œClean Gasโ€ Transition Bond (France)
Clean gas? The bond funded new LNG terminals, not wind turbines.

53. DRC Government โ€œSustainable Miningโ€ Bond
Tied to cobalt extraction with child labor concernsโ€”framed as โ€œbattery supply chain sustainability.โ€

54. Occidental Petroleum โ€œCarbon Offsetโ€ Bond (USA)
Issued to finance carbon capture… for enhanced oil recovery. So, oil-funded offsets for more oil.

55. Facebook (Meta) โ€œSocial Good & Connectivityโ€ Bond (USA)
Labeled ESG for โ€œdigital inclusion,โ€ while enabling disinformation and data exploitation.

56. Iran โ€œEco-Islamic Financeโ€ Sukuk
Included vague climate goals but backed heavy industrial development.

57. Italy โ€œGreen Renaissanceโ€ Bond
Used for metro expansions and… highway widenings. Still cars, still emissions.

58. Kazakhstan โ€œEco-Industryโ€ Sovereign Bond
Greenwashing for heavy industrial zones with limited oversight or sustainable planning.

59. Exxon โ€œBlue Carbonโ€ Ocean Bond (USA)
Issued to support mangrove preservationโ€”while expanding offshore drilling in the same regions.

60. British American Tobacco โ€œHealth & Sustainabilityโ€ ESG Note (UK)
Promoted vaping and โ€œreduced harmโ€ products as part of a โ€œhealth-focused future.โ€ ESG irony overdose.


Here are entries 61 to 80 of the Top 100 Most Absurd Green Bonds & ESG Debt Instruments Ever Issued:


61. Glencore โ€œEco-Miningโ€ ESG Note (Switzerland)
Branded as sustainable while financing coal and cobalt mines infamous for rights abuses.

62. Belarus โ€œEnvironmental Stabilityโ€ Sovereign Bond
Used for dam construction and hydro projects with major biodiversity destruction risks.

63. Chevron โ€œNature-Based Solutionsโ€ Bond (USA)
Issued for carbon offset programs tied to questionable forest projects and land grabs.

64. Turkey โ€œGreen Megaprojectโ€ Infrastructure Bond
Marketed as sustainable while financing airport expansions and bridge megaprojects.

65. Credit Suisse โ€œClean Investmentโ€ Note (Switzerland)
Touted ESG innovation. Proceeds went to clients under money laundering and fossil fuel probes.

66. Aramco โ€œSustainable Petroleumโ€ Bond (Saudi Arabia)
Possibly the most oxymoronic title in green finance. Funded refinery upgrades.

67. Poland โ€œClimate-Resilient Agricultureโ€ Bond
Promoted meat-heavy farming and fertilizer subsidiesโ€”disguised as โ€œclimate smart.โ€

68. Deutsche Bank โ€œESG Commitmentโ€ Bond (Germany)
Underpinned by internal ESG ratings. Backed companies exposed for deforestation and corruption.

69. Enbridge โ€œNet-Zero Pipelineโ€ Transition Bond (Canada)
A โ€œgreenโ€ bond used to expand oil pipelines with promised future offsets.

70. Argentina โ€œGreen Sovereign Bondโ€
Proceeds ambiguously spent on dams and farming expansionsโ€”no credible ESG tracking.

71. Statoil/Equinor โ€œArctic Renewablesโ€ Bond (Norway)
Greenwashing label on Arctic exploration zones, with token wind mentions.

72. Kazakhstan Oil Company โ€œEnvironmental Integrityโ€ Bond
Touted as eco-conscious while expanding oil sands-like projects.

73. McDonaldโ€™s โ€œESG Food Futureโ€ Note (USA)
Used to install recycling bins while lobbying against plant-based regulations.

74. Cambodia โ€œSustainable Tourismโ€ Bond
Funded golf resorts and casinos in protected forest areas. Green leisure?

75. Bank of China โ€œEcological Investmentโ€ Bond
Channeled into coal-plant โ€œupgradesโ€ and traffic-heavy highways.

76. Iraq โ€œSustainable Infrastructureโ€ Bond
Post-conflict funding with little environmental oversightโ€”mostly roads and diesel power.

77. Lufthansa โ€œCarbon-Neutral Aviationโ€ Bond (Germany)
Supported fleet modernizationโ€”yet no real cap on total flight emissions.

78. South Africa โ€œJust Transitionโ€ Bond
Promised coal phaseout. Instead subsidized new gas development near poor communities.

79. Kuwait โ€œEco-Petroleumโ€ Sovereign Bond
Green gloss over expansionary oil projects. โ€œEfficiency upgradesโ€ was the buzzword.

80. Microsoft โ€œAI for Sustainabilityโ€ ESG Bond (USA)
Claimed to use AI for climate solutions. Actually funded datacenter expansion with huge energy use.


Here are entries 81 to 100 of the Top 100 Most Absurd Green Bonds & ESG Debt Instruments Ever Issued:


81. Qatar โ€œSustainable Citiesโ€ Bond
Built desert megaprojects with extreme water consumption and imported energy reliance.

82. Nestlรฉ โ€œWater Responsibilityโ€ ESG Bond (Switzerland)
Issued while facing global backlash for water privatization and plastic pollution.

83. Malaysia โ€œPalm Oil Transitionโ€ Bond
Claimed sustainability. Mostly funded land clearing and monoculture expansion.

84. Shell โ€œCarbon Offsetโ€ Note (UK)
Financed carbon offsets widely criticized as double-counted or imaginary.

85. Saudi Electricity Company โ€œGreen Gridโ€ Bond
Marketed as renewable transition; mostly used for fossil-powered grid upgrades.

86. Tesla โ€œSustainable Innovationโ€ Bond (USA)
Funded lithium supply chains with little regard for environmental or labor standards.

87. Bulgaria โ€œEco-Infrastructureโ€ Bond
Paid for concrete-heavy infrastructure with massive ecological footprint.

88. BP โ€œPost-Carbonโ€ ESG Note (UK)
Used ESG buzzwords to finance gas and petrochemical expansions.

89. Azerbaijan โ€œCaspian Clean Energyโ€ Bond
Green bond tied to fossil exports and highly polluting energy corridors.

90. Starbucks โ€œSustainable Coffeeโ€ Bond (USA)
Marketing triumph, but minimal funds reached farmers; deforestation issues lingered.

91. Indonesia โ€œEco-Tourismโ€ Sovereign Bond
Tourism-based developments destroyed mangroves and dislocated communities.

92. Goldman Sachs โ€œInclusive ESGโ€ Bond (USA)
Labelled inclusive. Primarily backed internal finance productsโ€”no measurable impact.

93. Uganda โ€œGreen Infrastructureโ€ Bond
Proceeds helped finance Chinese-led oil roads and environmental degradation.

94. Royal Caribbean โ€œClean Oceansโ€ Bond (USA)
Cruise line issued ESG debt for emission-reduction techโ€”while expanding its fleet.

95. Deutsche Lufthansa โ€œCarbon Balanced Travelโ€ Note (Germany)
Covered minimal biofuel use and promoted offsets without real cuts.

96. Libya โ€œEco-Restorationโ€ Bond
No credible projects tied to the bond. Seen as a pure greenwashing tool.

97. Brazilian โ€œAmazon Bio-Economyโ€ Bond
Logged forests to create โ€œsustainable agroindustry.โ€ The irony stings.

98. US Department of Defense โ€œEnergy Efficiencyโ€ Bond
Used ESG finance to retrofit military bases. Still bombing, but with LEDs.

99. ExxonMobil โ€œFuture Generationsโ€ Bond (USA)
Named to evoke progress. Actually used for asset upgrades in oil rigs.

100. Vatican Bank โ€œEthical Green Financeโ€ Note
Issued to fund โ€œsustainable spiritual development.โ€ Funds tracked to questionable investments.


Support Truth-Telling, Not Greenwashing!
Help expose the worldโ€™s most absurd ESG scams and fake sustainability schemes. Donate anonymously with Monero or support us via:

Your contribution fuels fearless investigations and satire that hold greenwashers accountable.

๐Ÿšจ URGENT: SUPPORT TRUTH & DEFEND FREEDOM ๐Ÿšจ
DONATE CRYPTO NOW TO KEEP CRITICAL INTEL PUBLIC

๐Ÿ” BITCOIN
0xdaa3b887f885fd7725d4d35d428bd3b402d616bb
๐ŸŒ ETH/BSC/POLYGON
0x271588b52701Ae34dA9D4B31716Df2669237AC7f
๐Ÿ›ก๏ธ MONERO (PRIVATE)
41yKiG6eGbQiDxFRTKNepSiqaGaUV5VQWePHL5KYuzrxBWswyc5dtxZ43sk1SFWxDB4XrsDwVQBd3ZPNJRNdUCou3j22Coh

๐Ÿ”— DONATE PAGE: https://berndpulch.org/donations/
๐Ÿ™ GOD BLESS YOUR COURAGE TO ACT ๐Ÿ™