“PROJECT TIME STARS – The Armstrong Economic Forecast Files”✌

📡 **“PROJECT TIME STARS”** – Inside Martin Armstrong’s Economic Prophecy Machine
From Pi to Power, explore the cycles behind collapses, CIA interest, and global financial fate. A cinematic journey through decades of data, sealed predictions, and forbidden forecasts.

🟥 Project: TIME STARS – Martin Armstrong’s Cycles, New Statements & Real-World Validation

GET THE FULL DOSSIER ONLY AT

https://www.patreon.com/posts/project-time-135133019?utm_medium=clipboard_copy&utm_source=copyLink&utm_campaign=postshare_creator&utm_content=join_link

FREE FOR DONORS AND PATRONS

🧠 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

🔍 SECTION 1 – ARMSTRONG ON DIALOGUE WORKS & DIESEN SHOW

📈 SECTION 2 – REAL GRAPHS & DOCUMENTED CYCLES

Cycle Type Duration Key Historical Peaks Coalition Sub‑Cycle ~2.15 years Midpoint accelerations in same wave structures Long Wave Political Cycle ~224 years Six 8.6‑year waves compose 51.6 year super-cycles aligned with major regime changes

🔐 SECTION 3 – CLAIMS VERSUS REALITY

🧩 SECTION 4 – STRATEGIC IMPLICATIONS FOR 2025–2030

🕵️‍♂️ CONCLUSION

Martin Armstrong’s cycle-based forecasting deserves renewed attention—not as fringe theory, but as a historically grounded model that has anticipated multiple global turning points. His recent statements reinforce a predictive timestamp: 2027–28 as the next crisis window, critical for asset preparation and strategic foresight. Combined with Sean Foo’s economic commentary, this report provides a fact‑based, actionable blueprint for financial интеллиgence.

🔐 APPENDIX – PATREONS ONLY

Graphs correlating ECM cycle peaks with Bloomberg & IMF crisis dates
Timeline file: Key cycle events 1977–2028
Excerpts from “Financial Panics of the World” and jury testimony documents
Recorded quotes from Dialogue Works episodes and Diesen discussions

🔗 Access Full Dossier → berndpulch.org/donations

#MartinArmstrong #EconomicConfidenceModel #PiCycle #SeanFooAnalysis #FinancialIntelligence #AboveTopSecret #CycleForecasting #PatreonExclusive

✌

✅ REAL & FACT-BASED ELEMENTS:

📌 1. Martin A. Armstrong’s Cycle Theory (ECM)

REAL: Armstrong developed the Economic Confidence Model (ECM) based on 8.6-year cycles (~3141 days), which he claims align with historical financial crises.
✅ Verified: New Yorker profile (2009), documentary The Forecaster, and his own site ArmstrongEconomics.com

📌 2. Accurate Cycle Dates

1987 (Black Monday crash)
1998 (Asian Crisis / Russia default)
2007 (Housing crash build-up)
2011 (Eurozone crisis)
2019 (Repo market event, pre-COVID correction)
✅ Documented: These events align well with his claimed 8.6-year markers.

📌 3. CIA interest in Armstrong’s model

Claimed by Armstrong, and mentioned in The New Yorker (2009) and The Forecaster documentary.
✅ Verifiable as his claim, though not confirmed by U.S. government.

📌 4. Imprisonment for contempt

REAL: Armstrong was jailed for 7 years for contempt of court during a financial fraud investigation.
✅ Court and media records confirm this.

📌 5. His recent statements on Dialogue Works / Glenn Diesen / Sean Foo

✅ REAL: Armstrong appears regularly on Dialogue Works and other YouTube shows.
His statements about cycles, BRICS, Taiwan, Ukraine, and the 2027–2028 global risk period are recent and publicly available.

🟡 PARTIALLY REAL / INTERPRETIVE:

🔶 Political Cycles (51.6-year or 224-year waves)

Based on historical analysis and Armstrong’s interpretation — not academically mainstream, but his data is structured.
⚠️ Treated as fringe theory by many economists, but has some empirical support in long-wave theory (Kondratiev cycles).

🔶 Correlation with sunspot cycles or metaphysical elements

Armstrong has hinted at broader natural or energy-based cycle forces.
⚠️ Not verifiable via academic consensus — interpretive, not scientific.

❌ NOT CONFIRMED / SPECULATIVE:

🔻 CIA “confiscating” his code

No evidence this actually happened; Armstrong claims the code was “confiscated,” but this remains unverified and undocumented.

🔻 U.S. manipulating conflict cycles in sync with his model

Interesting theory, but no proof exists that U.S. policy deliberately follows Armstrong’s ECM. It’s a hypothesis, not a fact.

🔎 CONCLUSION:

✅ What’s real:

Armstrong’s models, graphs, prison history, interviews, statements, and public predictions.

🟡 What’s semi-real:

His interpretation of long political cycles and economic waves.

❌ What’s not confirmed:

Intelligence agencies using his models behind the scenes.

🔍 OFFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SOURCES

🇬🇧 English

🟢 Primary Domain: BerndPulch.org
🔄 Mirror: GoogleFirst.org
📁 Archives: Rumble • WordPress

🇩🇪 Deutsch

🟢 Hauptdomain: BerndPulch.org
🔄 Spiegel: GoogleFirst.org
📁 Archive: Rumble • WordPress

🇪🇸 Español

🟢 Dominio principal: BerndPulch.org
🔄 Espejo: GoogleFirst.org
📁 Archivos: Rumble • WordPress

🇫🇷 Français

🟢 Domaine principal: BerndPulch.org
🔄 Miroir: GoogleFirst.org
📁 Archives: Rumble • WordPress

🇵🇹 Português

🟢 Domínio principal: BerndPulch.org
🔄 Espelho: GoogleFirst.org
📁 Arquivos: Rumble • WordPress