Methodology for the “Top 100 Most Absurd Green Bonds & ESG Debt Instruments” Ranking
This satirical yet data-informed ranking was compiled using the following criteria:
- Contradictory Use of Funds: Projects labeled “green” or “sustainable” that finance clearly environmentally destructive, socially harmful, or ethically dubious activities — e.g., oil pipelines, deforestation-linked agriculture, or weapons manufacturers.
- Greenwashing Language: Bonds marketed with excessive ESG jargon, where the fine print reveals little to no actual sustainability impact, or where environmental terms are used purely as branding tools.
- Corporate Reputation Mismatch: Issuers with a track record of human rights violations, environmental pollution, or fraud issuing “green” debt instruments with minimal accountability or transparency.
- Rating & Certification Farces: Deals that obtained ESG certifications (e.g., from second-party opinion providers or rating agencies) despite obviously violating the spirit of sustainability.
- Lack of Measurable Impact: Instruments with no clear metrics, benchmarks, or oversight mechanisms to track the promised positive outcomes.
- Public Scandal or Backlash: Bonds or funds that sparked protests, legal challenges, or media exposure for ESG-related hypocrisy.
Sources include: international financial news reports, NGO audits, ESG watchdog databases, investment prospectuses, and expert analyses from the sustainability finance space.
Here are entries 1 to 20 of the Top 100 Most Absurd Green Bonds & ESG Debt Instruments Ever Issued:
1. PetroAmazonas “Sustainable Extraction” Bond (Ecuador)
Marketed as “eco-friendly oil drilling,” this bond funded operations in the Amazon rainforest—literally destroying biodiversity while using ESG buzzwords.
2. Gazprom “Clean Energy Transition” Bond (Russia)
A green bond for expanding natural gas pipelines through fragile ecosystems. Emissions? Nyet, just ignore them.
3. Saudi Aramco “Green Growth” Sukuk (Saudi Arabia)
Labeled sustainable for efficiency upgrades—on oil rigs. Yes, the world’s top oil exporter went green… on paper.
4. Adani Group “Green Infrastructure Bond” (India)
Backed by a conglomerate expanding coal mining. It claimed ESG alignment by promising to plant trees somewhere, someday.
5. ExxonMobil “Low Carbon Energy” Note (USA)
A “green” issuance tied to a refinery upgrade project — which increased capacity and emissions.
6. China Three Gorges Corporation “Sustainable Hydropower” Bond
Funded dam construction that displaced entire villages and destroyed river ecosystems.
7. TotalEnergies “Biodiversity Protection Bond” (France)
Issued after oil spills, this bond claimed to offset destruction with vague conservation funding—never independently verified.
8. Chevron “Carbon Efficiency” Note (USA)
Promised “lower emissions per barrel” as it opened a new offshore drilling site.
9. Lukoil “Renewable Transition” Bond (Russia)
Spent over 90% on fossil fuel infrastructure under the excuse of improving energy efficiency.
10. Shell “Sustainable Development Goals” Linked Bond (Netherlands/UK)
Cynically tied to UN goals while continuing Arctic drilling.
11. CNPC “Green Refinery” Bond (China)
Backed a refinery modernization project—increasing output and CO₂ emissions.
12. Halliburton “ESG Leadership” Bond (USA)
Issued after PR scandals, this bond funded pipeline services with vague ESG claims and no metrics.
13. Rio Tinto “Social Sustainability” Note (UK/Australia)
Issued just months after destroying an Aboriginal heritage site in Juukan Gorge.
14. Glencore “Responsible Mining” Green Bond (Switzerland)
Labeled ESG-friendly while financing cobalt extraction linked to child labor in the DRC.
15. Enbridge “Green Infrastructure” Bond (Canada)
Financed a pipeline through Indigenous lands while promoting it as a low-emissions project.
16. BP “Clean Future” Bond (UK)
Spent majority on PR campaigns and minimal amounts on solar R&D.
17. ENI “Carbon Mitigation Bond” (Italy)
Issued while doubling down on new offshore drilling blocks.
18. Equinor “Sustainable Transition” Note (Norway)
Used to fund controversial Arctic oil projects with “net-zero ambition” marketing.
19. Coal India “Green Transformation” Bond
Yes, a coal giant issued a green bond. Claimed it was for dust control at coal mines.
20. Deutsche Bank “ESG Pioneer” Structured Note (Germany)
Backed an index full of fossil fuel and defense contractors—branded as “green tech.”
Here are entries 21 to 40 of the Top 100 Most Absurd Green Bonds & ESG Debt Instruments Ever Issued:
21. Rosneft “Eco-Energy” Bond (Russia)
Labeled green for “reducing flaring” while funding deep Arctic oil drilling. Carbon-neutral gaslighting at its finest.
22. Bayer “Sustainable Agriculture” Bond (Germany)
Issued post-Monsanto merger, it financed GMO promotion and glyphosate-heavy farming.
23. BHP “Green Transition” Note (Australia/UK)
Claimed to fund renewable energy for mining operations—still led to massive deforestation and water use.
24. North Dakota “Green Fracking” Muni Bond (USA)
Local government-issued debt to support “efficient” hydraulic fracturing. Frack responsibly?
25. Petrobras “Eco-Resilience” Bond (Brazil)
Labeled as sustainable despite funding offshore rigs near marine biodiversity hotspots.
26. Coal Ministry of India “Environmental Modernization Bond”
Used to buy newer coal trucks and sprinklers. Still coal. Still absurd.
27. Nestlé “Sustainable Water Use” Bond (Switzerland)
After scandals over water privatization, this bond funded water extraction plants. “Green” for filtering before bottling.
28. Vietnam State Bank “Eco-Industry Development Bond”
Issued to boost manufacturing in “special economic zones”—with relaxed environmental oversight.
29. Palantir “Ethical AI” ESG Note (USA)
Claimed ESG compliance despite massive controversy over surveillance tools and military contracts.
30. Egypt “Green Pyramid” Infrastructure Bond
Included projects that involved desert road construction over protected habitats. Literal greenwashing in the sand.
31. JPMorgan Chase “ESG Leadership” Note (USA)
Touted for impact investing. Top holdings? Oil, weapons, and private prisons.
32. Qatar Petroleum “Green LNG” Bond
Marketed liquefied natural gas as a bridge to renewables while expanding fossil infrastructure.
33. Uganda “Sustainable Growth” Bond
Used to back Chinese-built oil pipelines with no credible environmental oversight.
34. Malaysia “Palm Oil Sustainability” Sukuk
Claimed to promote “sustainable” palm oil. Backed companies fined for illegal deforestation.
35. Shell Nigeria “Community Engagement” Bond
Used ESG language while linked to major oil spills and displacement lawsuits.
36. HSBC “Low Carbon Transition” Note (UK)
Portfolio included cement, airlines, and fossil fuels. Somehow still passed ESG screens.
37. TotalEnergies “Green Africa” Development Bond
Tied to pipeline development in Uganda and Tanzania. Community protests ensued.
38. Morocco “Green Desert” Solar Bond
Funded solar projects tied to water-intensive mega-farming operations.
39. Boeing “ESG Aerospace Innovation” Bond (USA)
Claimed to innovate for the planet… while investing in new fighter jets.
40. Tesla “Carbon-Neutral Innovation” Bond (USA)
Backed gigafactory expansions with dubious lithium sourcing in Indigenous territories.
Here are entries 41 to 60 of the Top 100 Most Absurd Green Bonds & ESG Debt Instruments Ever Issued:
41. Abu Dhabi “Net Zero” Sovereign Green Bond
Marketed as climate-positive while backing oil infrastructure “efficiency upgrades.” Desert mirage economics.
42. Indian Railways “Sustainable Transport” Bond
Heavily used to electrify lines serving coal transport corridors. Powered by coal, of course.
43. Amazon.com “Climate Pledge” Note (USA)
Used to fund electric delivery vans—while maintaining massive emissions through data centers and air freight.
44. Nigeria “Green Growth” Sovereign Bond
Tied to infrastructure that directly enabled oil and gas extraction expansion.
45. Barclays “Responsible Banking” ESG Note (UK)
Packed with fossil fuel and arms industry clients. Just… responsibly.
46. Fortescue Metals “Green Mining” Bond (Australia)
Supported expansion of iron ore mines under the guise of “clean steel” pathways.
47. Ukrainian Government “War Recovery Green Bond”
Some proceeds funneled to rebuild gas and coal plants—framed as eco-recovery.
48. Philippine “Typhoon Recovery” ESG Bond
Marketed as climate response. Spent on roads and infrastructure that worsened environmental degradation.
49. Bayer-Monsanto “Climate-Resilient Agriculture” Bond
Funded seeds and pesticides accused of harming pollinators and soil integrity.
50. Russia’s Ministry of Finance “Green Infrastructure” Bond
Built roads and gas pipelines in the name of “improved energy efficiency.”
51. Volkswagen “Clean Drive” ESG Note (Germany)
Issued post-emissions scandal, with no third-party oversight. Just trust them this time.
52. GDF Suez/Engie “Clean Gas” Transition Bond (France)
Clean gas? The bond funded new LNG terminals, not wind turbines.
53. DRC Government “Sustainable Mining” Bond
Tied to cobalt extraction with child labor concerns—framed as “battery supply chain sustainability.”
54. Occidental Petroleum “Carbon Offset” Bond (USA)
Issued to finance carbon capture… for enhanced oil recovery. So, oil-funded offsets for more oil.
55. Facebook (Meta) “Social Good & Connectivity” Bond (USA)
Labeled ESG for “digital inclusion,” while enabling disinformation and data exploitation.
56. Iran “Eco-Islamic Finance” Sukuk
Included vague climate goals but backed heavy industrial development.
57. Italy “Green Renaissance” Bond
Used for metro expansions and… highway widenings. Still cars, still emissions.
58. Kazakhstan “Eco-Industry” Sovereign Bond
Greenwashing for heavy industrial zones with limited oversight or sustainable planning.
59. Exxon “Blue Carbon” Ocean Bond (USA)
Issued to support mangrove preservation—while expanding offshore drilling in the same regions.
60. British American Tobacco “Health & Sustainability” ESG Note (UK)
Promoted vaping and “reduced harm” products as part of a “health-focused future.” ESG irony overdose.
Here are entries 61 to 80 of the Top 100 Most Absurd Green Bonds & ESG Debt Instruments Ever Issued:
61. Glencore “Eco-Mining” ESG Note (Switzerland)
Branded as sustainable while financing coal and cobalt mines infamous for rights abuses.
62. Belarus “Environmental Stability” Sovereign Bond
Used for dam construction and hydro projects with major biodiversity destruction risks.
63. Chevron “Nature-Based Solutions” Bond (USA)
Issued for carbon offset programs tied to questionable forest projects and land grabs.
64. Turkey “Green Megaproject” Infrastructure Bond
Marketed as sustainable while financing airport expansions and bridge megaprojects.
65. Credit Suisse “Clean Investment” Note (Switzerland)
Touted ESG innovation. Proceeds went to clients under money laundering and fossil fuel probes.
66. Aramco “Sustainable Petroleum” Bond (Saudi Arabia)
Possibly the most oxymoronic title in green finance. Funded refinery upgrades.
67. Poland “Climate-Resilient Agriculture” Bond
Promoted meat-heavy farming and fertilizer subsidies—disguised as “climate smart.”
68. Deutsche Bank “ESG Commitment” Bond (Germany)
Underpinned by internal ESG ratings. Backed companies exposed for deforestation and corruption.
69. Enbridge “Net-Zero Pipeline” Transition Bond (Canada)
A “green” bond used to expand oil pipelines with promised future offsets.
70. Argentina “Green Sovereign Bond”
Proceeds ambiguously spent on dams and farming expansions—no credible ESG tracking.
71. Statoil/Equinor “Arctic Renewables” Bond (Norway)
Greenwashing label on Arctic exploration zones, with token wind mentions.
72. Kazakhstan Oil Company “Environmental Integrity” Bond
Touted as eco-conscious while expanding oil sands-like projects.
73. McDonald’s “ESG Food Future” Note (USA)
Used to install recycling bins while lobbying against plant-based regulations.
74. Cambodia “Sustainable Tourism” Bond
Funded golf resorts and casinos in protected forest areas. Green leisure?
75. Bank of China “Ecological Investment” Bond
Channeled into coal-plant “upgrades” and traffic-heavy highways.
76. Iraq “Sustainable Infrastructure” Bond
Post-conflict funding with little environmental oversight—mostly roads and diesel power.
77. Lufthansa “Carbon-Neutral Aviation” Bond (Germany)
Supported fleet modernization—yet no real cap on total flight emissions.
78. South Africa “Just Transition” Bond
Promised coal phaseout. Instead subsidized new gas development near poor communities.
79. Kuwait “Eco-Petroleum” Sovereign Bond
Green gloss over expansionary oil projects. “Efficiency upgrades” was the buzzword.
80. Microsoft “AI for Sustainability” ESG Bond (USA)
Claimed to use AI for climate solutions. Actually funded datacenter expansion with huge energy use.
Here are entries 81 to 100 of the Top 100 Most Absurd Green Bonds & ESG Debt Instruments Ever Issued:
81. Qatar “Sustainable Cities” Bond
Built desert megaprojects with extreme water consumption and imported energy reliance.
82. Nestlé “Water Responsibility” ESG Bond (Switzerland)
Issued while facing global backlash for water privatization and plastic pollution.
83. Malaysia “Palm Oil Transition” Bond
Claimed sustainability. Mostly funded land clearing and monoculture expansion.
84. Shell “Carbon Offset” Note (UK)
Financed carbon offsets widely criticized as double-counted or imaginary.
85. Saudi Electricity Company “Green Grid” Bond
Marketed as renewable transition; mostly used for fossil-powered grid upgrades.
86. Tesla “Sustainable Innovation” Bond (USA)
Funded lithium supply chains with little regard for environmental or labor standards.
87. Bulgaria “Eco-Infrastructure” Bond
Paid for concrete-heavy infrastructure with massive ecological footprint.
88. BP “Post-Carbon” ESG Note (UK)
Used ESG buzzwords to finance gas and petrochemical expansions.
89. Azerbaijan “Caspian Clean Energy” Bond
Green bond tied to fossil exports and highly polluting energy corridors.
90. Starbucks “Sustainable Coffee” Bond (USA)
Marketing triumph, but minimal funds reached farmers; deforestation issues lingered.
91. Indonesia “Eco-Tourism” Sovereign Bond
Tourism-based developments destroyed mangroves and dislocated communities.
92. Goldman Sachs “Inclusive ESG” Bond (USA)
Labelled inclusive. Primarily backed internal finance products—no measurable impact.
93. Uganda “Green Infrastructure” Bond
Proceeds helped finance Chinese-led oil roads and environmental degradation.
94. Royal Caribbean “Clean Oceans” Bond (USA)
Cruise line issued ESG debt for emission-reduction tech—while expanding its fleet.
95. Deutsche Lufthansa “Carbon Balanced Travel” Note (Germany)
Covered minimal biofuel use and promoted offsets without real cuts.
96. Libya “Eco-Restoration” Bond
No credible projects tied to the bond. Seen as a pure greenwashing tool.
97. Brazilian “Amazon Bio-Economy” Bond
Logged forests to create “sustainable agroindustry.” The irony stings.
98. US Department of Defense “Energy Efficiency” Bond
Used ESG finance to retrofit military bases. Still bombing, but with LEDs.
99. ExxonMobil “Future Generations” Bond (USA)
Named to evoke progress. Actually used for asset upgrades in oil rigs.
100. Vatican Bank “Ethical Green Finance” Note
Issued to fund “sustainable spiritual development.” Funds tracked to questionable investments.
Support Truth-Telling, Not Greenwashing!
Help expose the world’s most absurd ESG scams and fake sustainability schemes. Donate anonymously with Monero or support us via:
Your contribution fuels fearless investigations and satire that hold greenwashers accountable.
🚨 URGENT: SUPPORT TRUTH & DEFEND FREEDOM 🚨
DONATE CRYPTO NOW TO KEEP CRITICAL INTEL PUBLIC
🔐 BITCOIN0xdaa3b887f885fd7725d4d35d428bd3b402d616bb
🌐 ETH/BSC/POLYGON0x271588b52701Ae34dA9D4B31716Df2669237AC7f
🛡️ MONERO (PRIVATE)41yKiG6eGbQiDxFRTKNepSiqaGaUV5VQWePHL5KYuzrxBWswyc5dtxZ43sk1SFWxDB4XrsDwVQBd3ZPNJRNdUCou3j22Coh
🔗 DONATE PAGE: https://berndpulch.org/donations/
🙏 GOD BLESS YOUR COURAGE TO ACT 🙏
Bernd Pulch 