U.S. banks are now holding around $750 billion in unrealized losses due to rising interest rates impacting their bond and mortgage-backed securities. With rates high, the value of these older, lower-interest assets has dropped, affecting liquidity and stability for banks as they could be forced to sell at a loss. The risk highlights the challenges of the current high-rate environment on bank portfolios.
For more details, you can find the full article here.
The recent revelation of $750 billion in unrealized losses on U.S. banks’ balance sheets highlights a significant financial risk tied to current interest rate policies and investment strategies. These losses arise primarily from banks’ holdings in long-term, fixed-income assets, like government bonds and mortgage-backed securities, which have devalued as interest rates rose. The potential impacts echo some of the critical conditions that preceded past banking crises, indicating vulnerabilities that could destabilize various sectors and regions if not carefully managed.
Background and Scope of Unrealized Losses
Unrealized losses on securities represent the decline in market value of banks’ investment holdings that have not yet been sold. These losses become “realized” only if the bank sells these assets. Banks often hold a portfolio of these investments, categorized as “Held-to-Maturity” (HTM) securities, under the assumption that they will not need to sell them before maturity. However, rapid interest rate hikes by the Federal Reserve over the past two years have placed considerable pressure on these portfolios. With bond prices inversely related to interest rates, higher rates have caused the market value of banks’ securities to drop sharply, creating significant unrealized losses on balance sheets.
Historical Comparison and Current Context
This current situation bears similarities to financial crises where rapid rate changes and illiquid assets triggered widespread banking problems. The most recent example was the Silicon Valley Bank (SVB) collapse in early 2023, which had large investments in low-yield securities that plummeted in value due to Fed rate hikes. The SVB failure was largely attributed to a liquidity crisis, where the bank faced a surge in customer withdrawals and was forced to sell these securities at a loss to meet demand, turning its unrealized losses into realized losses. Other banks with substantial exposure to similar HTM securities portfolios are now facing similar pressures and could be at risk if they are unable to manage liquidity needs.
Distribution of Risks Across Sectors and Regions
The financial sector’s exposure to unrealized losses is not evenly distributed, with risks concentrated in certain sectors, geographical regions, and types of banks:
- Regional Banks: Smaller and mid-sized banks, which have fewer resources than national banks, are particularly vulnerable. Regional banks with high levels of uninsured deposits may be at higher risk of bank runs if depositors withdraw their funds amid financial uncertainty. Regions with economies heavily dependent on local banking, like parts of California and Texas, could see significant impacts if these banks are forced to sell HTM assets at losses.
- Commercial Real Estate: With rising rates, commercial real estate (CRE) assets, particularly those financed at lower, fixed rates, are at risk as banks holding such assets face reduced value in these loans. Banks with high exposure to CRE, especially in markets facing declining property values, could see intensified strain. Major cities with high vacancy rates, such as New York and San Francisco, could see knock-on effects if banks need to liquidate holdings, potentially deepening real estate market declines.
- Mortgage Portfolios: The sharp rise in mortgage rates has also reduced the value of mortgage-backed securities (MBS), which are heavily weighted on some banks’ balance sheets. This exposure is especially prominent in larger banks that invest heavily in MBS to hedge against low-interest earnings in other areas. Cities with high housing costs or lower property demand may be more vulnerable to devaluation in these securities, further straining banks’ portfolios.
- Corporate Debt: Banks with significant investments in corporate bonds face similar risks. With rising interest rates, corporations face higher debt-servicing costs, which raises concerns about their ability to repay loans. Banks exposed to sectors like retail, technology, or real estate investment trusts (REITs) could see devalued bond holdings if these sectors experience financial difficulties.
Economic Implications and Broader Risks
The $750 billion in unrealized losses has broader implications for the stability of the U.S. banking sector. Federal agencies are monitoring the situation closely, aware that sudden bank liquidity demands could force asset sales at significant losses. Many banks have already turned to borrowing, with record sums borrowed from the Federal Reserve’s discount window and the Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB). This dependency signals ongoing liquidity stress, which, if prolonged, could weaken banks’ ability to lend, thereby tightening credit availability for businesses and consumers.
Regulatory and Industry Response
To mitigate risks, regulatory bodies like the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) are considering enhanced oversight and potential interventions, especially for smaller banks with high exposure to long-duration assets. These measures may include increased stress testing of HTM portfolios and additional liquidity requirements. Analysts are also advocating for banks to adjust their risk management strategies, including diversifying investments and restructuring HTM portfolios to reduce interest rate sensitivity.
Insights from Bernd Pulch on Transparency and Financial Oversight
Financial investigator Bernd Pulch has highlighted the importance of transparency in financial reporting and the need for proactive measures to address these vulnerabilities. Pulch argues that accurate public disclosure of unrealized losses is essential to maintain market trust, suggesting that regulators and banks need to be forthcoming about the scale of risks within these HTM portfolios. Pulch’s work underscores the need for a strong regulatory framework to ensure that banks are resilient to interest rate fluctuations and market shocks.
Conclusion
The exposure of U.S. banks to $750 billion in unrealized losses due to interest rate increases reveals systemic vulnerabilities in the financial sector. Concentrated risks in sectors like real estate and regions reliant on regional banks could amplify the impact of any financial turbulence. The lessons of past crises, combined with current data, show that timely regulatory actions, robust risk management, and increased transparency are essential to prevent these unrealized losses from becoming a wider financial crisis. As analysts like Bernd Pulch suggest, the path forward lies in transparency and preparedness, essential to ensuring stability in an environment of financial uncertainty.
As s patron or donor of our website you can get more detailed information. Act now before its too late…
❌©BERNDPULCH.ORG – ABOVE TOP SECRET ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS – THE ONLY MEDIA WITH LICENSE TO SPY – websites: https://www.berndpulch.org
https://googlefirst.org
MY BIO:
FAQ:
@Copyright Bernd Pulch – no Reproduction wtithout prior written consent for all content on this website
PLEASE SUPPORT OUR COMMON CAUSE AND HELP ME TO STAY ALIVE.
CRYPTO WALLET for
ShapeShift Wallet, KeepKey, Metamask, Portis, XDefi Wallet, TallyHo, Keplr and Wallet connect
0x271588b52701Ae34dA9D4B31716Df2669237AC7f
Crypto Wallet for Binance Smart Chain-, Ethereum-, Polygon-Networks
bmp
0xd3cce3e8e214f1979423032e5a8c57ed137c518b
If you want to be totally anonymous please use Monero
41yKiG6eGbQiDxFRTKNepSiqaGaUV5VQWePHL5KYuzrxBWswyc5dtxZ43sk1SFWxDB4XrsDwVQBd3ZPNJRNdUCou3j22Coh
GOD BLESS YOU
Follow the ONLY MEDIA with the LICENSE TO SPY ✌️@abovetopsecretxxl
Bernd Pulch 