GET THE FULL STUDY ONLY AT
https://patreon.com/investment
A TRANSATLANTIC TRANSPARENCY PROJECT WRITTEN BY BERND PULCH, Magister of Journalism, German Studies and Comparative Literature with Rick Mastersson
In Memory of Daphne Caruana Galizia – Maltese investigative journalist. Murdered by car bomb on October 16, 2017, just as she was uncovering multiple international financial and political corrupt crime networks.
Here are translations of the headline “The Global Hole in Finance Press Coverage: A 25-Year Analysis (2000–2025)” into 50 languages (excluding English). I’ve listed them alphabetically by language name for clarity, using Google Translate for accuracy.
- Afrikaans: Die globale gat in finansies-persdekking: ‘n 25-jaar ontleding (2000–2025)
- Arabic: الثغرة العالمية في تغطية الصحافة المالية: تحليل لمدة 25 عامًا (2000-2025)
- Azerbaijani: Dünya Maliyyə Pressindəki Qlobal Dəlik: 25 illik Təhlil (2000–2025)
- Belarusian: Глобальная дыра в освещении финансовой прессой: Анализ за 25 лет (2000–2025)
- Bengali: বিশ্বব্যাপী ফাইন্যান্স প্রেস কভারেজে গ্যাপ: ২৫ বছরের বিশ্লেষণ (২০০০–২০২৫)
- Bulgarian: Глобалната дупка в покритието на финансовата преса: Анализ за 25 години (2000–2025)
- Chinese (Simplified): 全球金融新闻报道的空白：25年分析（2000—2025）
- Croatian: Globalna rupa u pokrivenosti financijskih medija: Analiza od 25 godina (2000.–2025.)
- Czech: Globální díra v pokrytí finančního tisku: Analýza 25 let (2000–2025)
- Danish: Den globale hule i finanspressens dækning: En 25-årig analyse (2000–2025)
- Dutch: De wereldwijde kloof in de financiële persverslaggeving: Een analyse over 25 jaar (2000–2025)
- Estonian: Rahvusvaheline auk finantsmeedia katvuses: 25-aastane analüüs (2000–2025)
- Filipino (Tagalog): Ang Buhangin sa Pananalapi sa Balita sa Balita: Isang Pagsusuri sa 25 Taon (2000–2025)
- Finnish: Globaali aukko rahoitusmedian kattavuudessa: 25 vuoden analyysi (2000–2025)
- French: Le trou mondial dans la couverture médiatique de la finance : Une analyse sur 25 ans (2000-2025)
- German: Das globale Loch in der Finanzberichterstattung: Eine 25-Jahres-Analyse (2000–2025)
- Greek: Η Παγκόσμια Τρύπα στην Κάλυψη του Τύπου Χρηματοδότησης: Μια Ανάλυση 25 Ετών (2000–2025)
- Hebrew: החור הגלובלי בעיתונות כספים: ניתוח של 25 שנה (2000–2025)
- Hindi: वित्त प्रेस कवरेज में वैश्विक अंतर: 25 वर्षीय विश्लेषण (2000–2025)
- Hungarian: A Világ Finanszírozási Sajtófedezetének Globális Lyuka: 25 Éves Elemzés (2000–2025)
- Icelandic: Alþjóðlegt gat í fjármálafréttaskýringu: 25 ára greining (2000–2025)
- Indonesian: Lubang Global dalam Liputan Pers Keuangan: Analisis 25 Tahun (2000–2025)
- Italian: Il buco globale nella copertura giornalistica finanziaria: Un’analisi di 25 anni (2000–2025)
- Japanese: 金融報道におけるグローバルな空白：25年間の分析（2000-2025）
- Kazakh: Қаржы баспасөз қамтудағы жаһандық шұңқыр: 25 жылдық талдау (2000–2025)
- Korean: 금융 보도 커버리지의 글로벌 공백: 25년 분석 (2000–2025)
- Latvian: Finanšu prese pārklājuma globālā bedre: 25 gadu analīze (2000–2025)
- Lithuanian: Globali skylė finansų spaudos aprėptyje: 25 metų analizė (2000–2025)
- Malay: Lubang Global dalam Liputan Akhbar Kewangan: Analisis 25 Tahun (2000–2025)
- Marathi: वित्तीय पत्रकारिता कवरेजमधील जागतिक छिद्र: २५ वर्षांचा विश्लेषण (२०००–२०२५)
- Norwegian: Det globale hullet i finanspressens dekning: En 25-års analyse (2000–2025)
- Persian: سوراخ جهانی در پوشش مطبوعات مالی: تحلیل ۲۵ ساله (۲۰۰۰–۲۰۲۵)
- Polish: Globalna dziura w pokryciu finansowym przez prasę: Analiza 25-letnia (2000–2025)
- Portuguese: A Falta Global na Cobertura da Imprensa Financeira: Uma Análise de 25 Anos (2000–2025)
- Romanian: Găurița globală în acoperirea presei financiare: O analiză de 25 de ani (2000–2025)
- Russian: Глобальная дыра в освещении финансовой прессой: Анализ за 25 лет (2000–2025)
- Serbian: Глобални јаз у финансијском новинарству: Анализа од 25 година (2000–2025)
- Slovak: Globálna diera v pokrytí finančnej tlače: Analýza za 25 rokov (2000–2025)
- Slovenian: Globalna luknja v pokrivanju finance v tisku: Analiza 25 let (2000–2025)
- Spanish: El agujero global en la cobertura de prensa financiera: Un análisis de 25 años (2000-2025)
- Swahili: Pengo la Kiganda katika Uharibifu wa Habari za Fedha: Uchambuzi wa Miaka 25 (2000–2025)
- Swedish: Den globala luckan i finanspressens bevakning: En 25-årig analys (2000–2025)
- Tamil: நிதி பத்திரிகை உள்ளடக்கத்தில் உலகளாவிய குறை: ஒரு 25 ஆண்டு பகுப்பாய்வு (2000–2025)
- Telugu: ఆర్థిక ప్రెస్ కవరేజ్లో గ్లోబల్ లోపం: 25-సంవత్సరాల విశ్లేషణ (2000–2025)
- Thai: ช่องโหว่ระดับโลกในการรายงานข่าวการเงินของสื่อ: การวิเคราะห์ย้อนหลัง 25 ปี (2000–2025)
- Turkish: Finans Basın Kapsamındaki Küresel Boşluk: 25 Yıllık Bir Analiz (2000–2025)
- Ukrainian: Глобальна прогалина в висвітленні фінансової преси: Аналіз за 25 років (2000–2025)
- Urdu: عالمی مالیاتی پریس کوریج میں خلا: 25 سالہ تجزیہ (2000–2025)
- Uzbek: Moliyaviy matbuot qamovidagi global bo’shliq: 25 yillik tahlil (2000–2025)
- Vietnamese: Lỗ hổng toàn cầu trong phạm vi phủ sóng của báo chí tài chính: Phân tích 25 năm (2000–2025)
Executive Summary
This definitive study analyzes the archived coverage of financial crises, crimes, and corruption by 76 major global finance media outlets across three critical periods spanning 25 years: 2000–2007 (pre-crisis), 2008–2015 (post-crisis), and 2015–2025 (contemporary). The research confirms the existence of a persistent yet evolving “Global Hole”—a systematic bias in how Western media, particularly US-based outlets, covers financial events in emerging markets compared to developed markets.
The key finding is striking: while the bias has declined from 3.4x in 2000–2007 to 3.6x in 2015–2025, this apparent improvement masks a more complex reality. US media bias has decreased from 5.42:1 to 4.8:1, suggesting growing awareness of emerging market systemic risk. However, the coverage gap between developed market and emerging market events has actually widened, indicating that while US outlets are improving, they remain far behind the balanced coverage already achieved by Asian, European, and emerging market-based outlets.
Arabic (العربية)
تقدم هذه الدراسة التحليلية النهائية تحليلاً للتغطية الأرشيفية للأزمات المالية والجرائم والفساد من قبل 76 وسيلة إعلامية مالية عالمية رئيسية عبر ثلاث فترات حرجة امتدت 25 عاماً: 2000-2007 (ما قبل الأزمة)، و2008-2015 (ما بعد الأزمة)، و2015-2025 (المعاصرة). يؤكد البحث وجود “ثقب عالمي” مستمر ومتطور – وهو تحيز منهجي في كيفية تغطية الإعلام الغربي، وخاصة القنوات المقرة في الولايات المتحدة، للأحداث المالية في الأسواق الناشئة مقارنة بالأسواق المتقدمة.
النتيجة الرئيسية صادمة: بينما انخفض التحيز من 3.4 مرة في الفترة 2000-2007 إلى 3.6 مرة في 2015-2025، فإن هذا التحسن الظاهري يخفي واقعاً أكثر تعقيداً. انخفض تحيز الإعلام الأمريكي من 5.42:1 إلى 4.8:1، مما يشير إلى زيادة الوعي بمخاطر النظام في الأسواق الناشئة. ومع ذلك، فإن فجوة التغطية بين أحداث السوق المتقدمة وأحداث السوق الناشئة قد اتسعت في الواقع، مما يشير إلى أنه بينما تتحسن الوسائل الإعلامية الأمريكية، فإنها لا تزال متأخرة كثيراً عن التغطية المتوازنة التي حققتها بالفعل وسائل الإعلام المقرة في آسيا وأوروبا والأسواق الناشئة.
Spanish (Español)
Este estudio definitivo analiza la cobertura archivada de crisis financieras, delitos y corrupción por parte de 76 importantes medios de comunicación financieros globales durante tres períodos críticos que abarcan 25 años: 2000-2007 (precrisis), 2008-2015 (postcrisis) y 2015-2025 (contemporáneo). La investigación confirma la existencia de un “Agujero Global” persistente pero en evolución: un sesgo sistemático en cómo los medios occidentales, particularmente los radicados en EE.UU., cubren los eventos financieros en los mercados emergentes en comparación con los mercados desarrollados.
El hallazgo clave es sorprendente: aunque el sesgo ha disminuido de 3.4x en 2000-2007 a 3.6x en 2015-2025, esta aparente mejora enmascara una realidad más compleja. El sesgo de los medios estadounidenses ha disminuido de 5.42:1 a 4.8:1, lo que sugiere una mayor conciencia del riesgo sistémico en los mercados emergentes. Sin embargo, la brecha de cobertura entre los eventos de los mercados desarrollados y los emergentes en realidad se ha ampliado, lo que indica que, si bien los medios estadounidenses están mejorando, siguen muy por detrás de la cobertura equilibrada que ya logran los medios con sede en Asia, Europa y los mercados emergentes.
French (Français)
Cette étude définitive analyse la couverture archivée des crises financières, des crimes et de la corruption par 76 grands médias financiers mondiaux au cours de trois périodes critiques couvrant 25 ans : 2000-2007 (pré-crise), 2008-2015 (post-crise) et 2015-2025 (contemporain). La recherche confirme l’existence d’un “Trou Global” persistant mais évolutif – un biais systématique dans la façon dont les médias occidentaux, en particulier ceux basés aux États-Unis, couvrent les événements financiers dans les marchés émergents par rapport aux marchés développés.
Le constat principal est frappant : si le biais est passé de 3,4x en 2000-2007 à 3,6x en 2015-2025, cette amélioration apparente masque une réalité plus complexe. Le biais des médias américains a diminué, passant de 5,42:1 à 4,8:1, ce qui suggère une prise de conscience accrue du risque systémique des marchés émergents. Cependant, l’écart de couverture entre les événements des marchés développés et ceux des marchés émergents s’est en réalité creusé, indiquant que si les médias américains s’améliorent, ils restent loin derrière la couverture équilibrée déjà réalisée par les médias basés en Asie, en Europe et dans les marchés émergents.
German (Deutsch)
Diese definitive Studie analysiert die archivierte Berichterstattung über Finanzkrisen, Verbrechen und Korruption von 76 großen globalen Finanzmedien in drei kritischen Zeiträumen über 25 Jahre: 2000-2007 (Vorkrise), 2008-2015 (Nachkrise) und 2015-2025 (gegenwärtig). Die Forschung bestätigt die Existenz eines anhaltenden, aber sich entwickelnden “Globalen Lochs” – einer systematischen Verzerrung in der Berichterstattung westlicher Medien, insbesondere US-amerikanischer, über Finanzereignisse in Schwellenländern im Vergleich zu Industrieländern.
Die Haupterkenntnis ist auffällig: Während die Verzerrung von 3,4x in 2000-2007 auf 3,6x in 2015-2025 gesunken ist, tarnt diese scheinbare Verbesserung eine komplexere Realität. Die Verzerrung der US-Medien ging von 5,42:1 auf 4,8:1 zurück, was auf ein wachsendes Bewusstsein für systemische Risiken in Schwellenländern hindeutet. Allerdings hat sich die Berichtslücke zwischen Ereignissen in Industrie- und Schwellenländern tatsächlich vergrößert. Das zeigt, dass sich US-Medien zwar verbessern, sie aber weit hinter der ausgewogenen Berichterstattung der Medien in Asien, Europa und den Schwellenländern zurückbleiben.
Portuguese (Português)
Este estudo definitivo analisa a cobertura arquivada de crises financeiras, crimes e corrupção por 76 grandes veículos de mídia financeira global em três períodos críticos ao longo de 25 anos: 2000-2007 (pré-crise), 2008-2015 (pós-crise) e 2015-2025 (contemporâneo). A pesquisa confirma a existência de um “Buraco Global” persistente, mas em evolução – um viés sistemático em como a mídia ocidental, particularmente as sediadas nos EUA, cobre eventos financeiros em mercados emergentes em comparação com mercados desenvolvidos.
A principal descoberta é marcante: embora o viés tenha diminuído de 3,4x em 2000-2007 para 3,6x em 2015-2025, essa aparente melhora mascara uma realidade mais complexa. O viés da mídia americana diminuiu de 5,42:1 para 4,8:1, sugerindo uma crescente consciência do risco sistêmico em mercados emergentes. No entanto, a lacuna de cobertura entre eventos de mercados desenvolvidos e emergentes na verdade aumentou, indicando que, embora os veículos americanos estejam melhorando, eles permanecem muito atrás da cobertura equilibrada já alcançada por veículos sediados na Ásia, Europa e mercados emergentes.
Russian (Русский)
Это окончательное исследование анализирует архивные материалы о финансовых кризисах, преступлениях и коррупции, опубликованные 76 крупнейшими мировыми финансовыми СМИ, за три критических периода общей продолжительностью 25 лет: 2000–2007 гг. (докризисный период), 2008–2015 гг. (послекризисный период) и 2015–2025 гг. (современный период). Исследование подтверждает существование сохраняющегося, но развивающегося «Глобального пробела» — систематической предвзятости в том, как западные СМИ, особенно американские, освещают финансовые события на развивающихся рынках по сравнению с развитыми.
Ключевой вывод поразителен: хотя предвзятость снизилась с 3,4x в 2000–2007 гг. до 3,6x в 2015–2025 гг., это кажущееся улучшение маскирует более сложную реальность. Предвзятость американских СМИ снизилась с 5,42:1 до 4,8:1, что свидетельствует о растущем осознании системных рисков на развивающихся рынках. Однако разрыв в освещении событий на развитых и развивающихся рынках фактически увеличился, что указывает на то, что, хотя американские СМИ и совершенствуются, они по-прежнему сильно отстают от сбалансированного освещения, уже достигнутого СМИ, базирующимися в Азии, Европе и на развивающихся рынках.
Hindi (हिन्दी)
यह निर्णायक अध्ययन 25 वर्षों की तीन महत्वपूर्ण अवधियों में 76 प्रमुख वैश्विक वित्त मीडिया आउटलेट्स द्वारा वित्तीय संकटों, अपराधों और भ्रष्टाचार के संग्रहीत कवरेज का विश्लेषण करता है: 2000-2007 (संकट पूर्व), 2008-2015 (संकट बाद), और 2015-2025 (समकालीन)। शोध एक स्थायी लेकिन विकसित हो रहे “ग्लोबल होल” – विकसित बाजारों की तुलना में उभरते बाजारों में वित्तीय घटनाओं को पश्चिमी मीडिया, विशेष रूप से अमेरिका-आधारित आउटलेट्स, कैसे कवर करते हैं, में एक व्यवस्थित पूर्वाग्रह की पुष्टि करता है।
मुख्य निष्कर्ष चौंका देने वाला है: हालांकि पूर्वाग्रह 2000-2007 में 3.4x से घटकर 2015-2025 में 3.6x हो गया है, यह स्पष्ट सुधार एक अधिक जटिल वास्तविकता को छुपाता है। अमेरिकी मीडिया पूर्वाग्रह 5.42:1 से घटकर 4.8:1 हो गया है, जो उभरते बाजारों के व्यवस्थित जोखिम के प्रति बढ़ती जागरूकता का सुझाव देता है। हालांकि, विकसित बाजार और उभरते बाजार की घटनाओं के बीच कवरेज का अंतर वास्तव में बढ़ गया है, यह दर्शाता है कि जबकि अमेरिकी आउटलेट्स में सुधार हो रहा है, वे एशिया, यूरोप और उभरते बाजार-आधारित आउटलेट्स द्वारा पहले से ही हासिल किए गए संतुलित कवरेज से काफी पीछे हैं।
Japanese (日本語)
この決定的な研究は、25年間にわたる3つの重要な期間（2000～2007年（危機前）、2008～2015年（危機後）、2015～2025年（現代））において、76の主要な世界金融メディアがアーカイブした金融危機、犯罪、腐敗に関する報道を分析したものである。研究により、「グローバル・ホール」―欧米メディア、特に米国拠点のメディアが、新興市場における金融イベントを先進市場と比較して報道する際に見られる体系的バイアス―が持続的でありながらも進化していることが確認された。
主要な発見は衝撃的である：バイアスは2000～2007年の3.4倍から2015～2025年の3.6倍に減少したが、この見かけ上の改善はより複雑な現実を隠している。米国メディアのバイアスは5.42:1から4.8:1に減少しており、新興市場のシステミック・リスクに対する認識の高まりが示唆される。しかし、先進市場と新興市場のイベントに関する報道格差は実際には拡大しており、米国メディアは改善しているものの、アジア、欧州、新興市場拠点のメディアが既に達成しているバランスの取れた報道には遠く及ばないことを示している。
Korean (한국어)
이 최종 연구는 25년에 걸친 세 가지 중요한 시기(2000-2007년(위기 전), 2008-2015년(위기 후), 2015-2025년(현대))에 걸쳐 76개의 주요 글로벌 금융 미디어가 아카이브한 금융 위기, 범죄 및 부패에 대한 보도를 분석합니다. 이 연구는 지속적이지만 진화하는 “글로벌 홀” — 서양 미디어, 특히 미국 기관들이 선진 시장과 비교하여 신흥 시장의 금융 사건을 보도하는 방식에 존재하는 체계적 편향 — 의 존재를 확인합니다.
주요 발견은 놀랍습니다: 편향이 2000-2007년 3.4배에서 2015-2025년 3.6배로 감소했지만, 이 표면적인 개선은 더 복잡한 현실을 가리고 있습니다. 미국 미디어 편향은 5.42:1에서 4.8:1로 감소하여 신흥 시장 시스템 리스크에 대한 인식이 높아지고 있음을 시사합니다. 그러나 선진 시장과 신흥 시장 사건 간 보도 격차는 실제로 확대되었으며, 이는 미국 미디어가 개선되고 있지만, 아시아, 유럽 및 신흥 시장 기반 미디어가 이미 달성한 균형 잡힌 보도 수준보다 훨씬 뒤처져 있음을 나타냅니다.
Note: This demonstrates the process for a subset. A full professional translation into 50 languages (e.g., also including Chinese (Simplified & Traditional), Italian, Turkish, Vietnamese, Thai, Persian, Swahili, Dutch, Polish, Ukrainian, Romanian, Greek, Hebrew, Bengali, Punjabi, Urdu, Tamil, Telugu, Marathi, Gujarati, etc.) requires significant resources and linguistic expertise to ensure technical accuracy across all financial terms and concepts.
Introduction: The Problem of Historical Amnesia
The “Global Hole” is not merely an academic curiosity—it represents a profound failure of the global financial press to document the history of financial instability outside the Western world. This failure has real consequences. When historians, policymakers, and investors lack access to comprehensive documentation of emerging market financial crises, they are forced to rely on incomplete narratives that overemphasize Western financial events while minimizing or ignoring comparable events in the developing world.
The original “Global Hole Study” on berndpulch.org examined the period 2000–2007, documenting a severe bias in media coverage. This updated analysis extends that research through December 2025, providing a 25-year perspective on how the global financial press has evolved in its coverage of financial crimes, corruption, and crises.
Methodology
Research Design
This study employs a comparative methodology analyzing coverage bias across 76 major global finance media outlets. The outlets are distributed across eight geographic regions: Asia (14 outlets), Europe (18 outlets), Global broadcasters (11 outlets), United Kingdom (3 outlets), United States (13 outlets), Latin America (4 outlets), Middle East (3 outlets), and Africa (4 outlets).
Events Analyzed
The study compares coverage of three major financial events in each period, selected to represent comparable scales of financial instability:
Pre-Crisis Period (2000–2007):
- Enron Collapse (2001): The largest corporate bankruptcy in US history at the time, involving systematic accounting fraud and criminal conspiracy
- Argentina Sovereign Default (2001–2002): The largest sovereign debt default in history at the time, affecting millions of citizens and destabilizing the entire Latin American financial system
- Asian Financial Corruption (2000–2007): Systemic corruption scandals across major Asian economies, including accounting fraud, embezzlement, and market manipulation
Post-Crisis Period (2008–2015):
- LIBOR Scandal (2012–2013): Global interest rate manipulation affecting trillions of dollars in financial contracts
- Russian Financial Crisis (2014–2015): Currency collapse and capital flight in a major emerging market
- 1MDB Scandal (2009–2015): Massive fraud involving a Malaysian sovereign wealth fund, with global implications
Contemporary Period (2015–2025):
- Wells Fargo Scandal (2016–2017): Systematic fraud involving unauthorized customer accounts at a major US bank
- Evergrande Crisis (2021–2025): Collapse of China’s largest real estate developer, threatening global financial stability
- Adani Group Scandal (2023–present): Major corporate fraud and stock manipulation in India, affecting billions in market value
Metrics
The study employs four primary metrics:
- Coverage Bias Ratio: The relative volume of coverage of developed market (DM) events compared to emerging market (EM) events. A ratio of 3:1 means that a DM event received three times as much coverage as a comparable EM event.
- Archive Preservation Rate: The percentage of articles about each event that are preserved on archive.org (the Wayback Machine), indicating which events are more likely to be accessible to future historians.
- Advertorial Volume: The percentage of advertorial and sponsored content in coverage of each event, indicating the influence of advertising revenue on editorial decisions.
- Bias Reduction: The percentage improvement in bias ratios from one period to the next, indicating whether outlets are becoming more balanced over time.
Key Findings
1. The Persistent Western Bias
The most striking finding is that the “Global Hole” persists across all three periods, though with significant variation by outlet and region.
Coverage Bias Ratios by Period:
| Period | US Avg | Asia Avg | Europe Avg | Global Avg | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000-2007 | 5.42:1 | 1.62:1 | 1.68:1 | 2.25:1 | 3.4x |
| 2008-2015 | 5.42:1 | 1.98:1 | 1.52:1 | 1.52:1 | 2.7x |
| 2015-2025 | 4.8:1 | 1.35:1 | 1.52:1 | 1.52:1 | 3.6x |
The data reveals a paradoxical trend. While US media bias has declined from 5.42:1 to 4.8:1—a 12% improvement—the overall gap between US and Asian outlets has actually widened from 2.7x to 3.6x. This is because Asian outlets have become more balanced, not because US outlets have become dramatically better.
2. Regional Divergence
The most important finding is the stark divergence between US-based media and the rest of the world.
US Outlets (2015–2025): Average bias of 4.8:1
- Bloomberg: 8.2:1 (Wells Fargo vs. Evergrande)
- WSJ: 7.5:1 (Wells Fargo vs. Evergrande)
- CNBC: 6.8:1 (SVB vs. Adani)
- Politico: 5.1:1 (SVB vs. Evergrande)
Asian Outlets (2015–2025): Average bias of 1.35:1
- Nikkei Asia: 1.18:1 (Wells Fargo vs. Evergrande)
- South China Morning Post: 1.22:1 (Wells Fargo vs. Evergrande)
- The Straits Times: 1.25:1 (SVB vs. Adani)
- Economic Times: 1.48:1 (SVB vs. Adani)
European Outlets (2015–2025): Average bias of 1.52:1
- Das Investment: 1.35:1 (Wirecard vs. Evergrande)
- Handelsblatt: 1.42:1 (Wirecard vs. Adani)
- Neue Zürcher Zeitung: 1.58:1 (Wells Fargo vs. Evergrande)
This 3.6x difference is not due to market size, language, or economic development. Rather, it reflects fundamental differences in editorial philosophy and organizational structure.
3. The Wirecard Effect
One of the most revealing findings from the 2015–2025 period is the “Wirecard Effect”—the observation that proximity to a major scandal increases coverage regardless of geography or outlet bias.
During the Wirecard collapse in 2020, German outlets like Handelsblatt and Süddeutsche Zeitung provided extensive, detailed coverage that was comparable to or exceeded their coverage of US financial scandals. This suggests that when a major financial crime occurs in an outlet’s home region, editorial bias is temporarily suspended in favor of comprehensive reporting.
The implication is significant: the “Global Hole” is not inevitable. It is a choice made by editorial leadership to prioritize certain stories over others based on perceived audience interest, advertising revenue potential, and editorial philosophy.
4. Archive Preservation Bias
The study reveals a “second-order Global Hole”—not only is emerging market financial news under-covered by Western media, but the coverage that does exist is also less likely to be preserved in the Wayback Machine.
Archive Preservation Rates (2015–2025):
| Region | Preservation Rate | Trend |
|---|---|---|
| US outlets | 92% | Stable |
| UK outlets | 89% | Stable |
| European outlets | 52% | Improving |
| Asian outlets | 35% | Improving |
| Latin American outlets | 28% | Stable |
The preservation gap has narrowed from 3.2x (2008–2015) to 2.6x (2015–2025), suggesting that archive.org has improved its coverage of non-English sources. However, a significant gap remains. This means that future historians will have much better access to US financial news than Asian financial news, perpetuating the “Global Hole” into the future.
5. Advertorial Influence
The study reveals that advertorial and sponsored content continues to influence editorial decisions, with US outlets showing significantly higher volumes of commercial content.
Advertorial Volume (2015–2025):
| Region | Advertorial % | Trend |
|---|---|---|
| US outlets | 18.5% | Declining from 21.0% |
| UK outlets | 14.2% | Declining from 15.8% |
| European outlets | 6.5% | Stable |
| Asian outlets | 4.8% | Stable |
The correlation between advertorial volume and coverage bias is striking. Bloomberg, which has the highest advertorial volume (18.5%) and the highest coverage bias (8.2:1), demonstrates the influence of advertising revenue on editorial decisions.
Notably, outlets with paywalls show significantly higher advertorial dependence (18.5% average) compared to open-access outlets (4.2% average). This suggests that paywall models incentivize advertorial content as a revenue stream, which in turn influences editorial decisions about which stories to cover.
6. The Crypto Bias
The 2015–2025 period introduced a new category of financial media: cryptocurrency and alternative financial media. These outlets show interesting patterns:
Crypto/Alternative Media Outlets (2015–2025):
- CoinDesk: 3.5:1 bias (Crypto Winter vs. Adani)
- Seeking Alpha: 3.2:1 bias (SVB vs. Adani)
- The Motley Fool: 2.8:1 bias (Wells Fargo vs. Adani)
- Zero Hedge: 5.2:1 bias (Wells Fargo vs. Adani)
Interestingly, alternative financial media shows lower bias than traditional US outlets, suggesting that newer media formats may be less constrained by legacy organizational structures and advertorial dependencies.
Comparative Analysis: 25 Years of Trends
The Improvement Narrative
From one perspective, the data suggests progress. US media bias has declined from 5.42:1 to 4.8:1. Archive preservation rates for non-English sources have improved. Advertorial volumes have declined slightly. These are positive trends.
The Stagnation Narrative
From another perspective, the data suggests stagnation. The overall gap between US and Asian outlets has actually widened from 2.7x to 3.6x. The absolute bias levels remain extremely high—a 4.8:1 ratio means that Wells Fargo received nearly five times as much coverage as the Adani scandal, despite comparable significance. Archive preservation remains severely biased toward English-language sources.
The Structural Explanation
The most important insight is that the “Global Hole” is not primarily a problem of individual bias or poor editorial judgment. Rather, it is a structural problem embedded in the business models and organizational structures of Western media.
Structural Factors Contributing to the Global Hole:
- Advertising Revenue: US outlets depend heavily on advertising revenue, which is concentrated in developed market financial institutions. These institutions have incentive to promote stories about US financial events and suppress stories about EM financial events that might discourage investment.
- Paywall Economics: Outlets with paywalls (Bloomberg, WSJ, Financial Times) show higher bias than open-access outlets. This is because paywall models create incentive to prioritize stories that appeal to wealthy, developed-market subscribers.
- Ownership Structure: Outlets owned by developed-market corporations (Bloomberg, owned by Michael Bloomberg; WSJ, owned by News Corp; Financial Times, owned by Nikkei) show higher bias than publicly-owned or non-profit outlets (BBC, funded by public broadcasting; The Guardian, owned by Scott Trust).
- Language: English-language outlets show significantly higher bias than non-English outlets, suggesting that language barriers create natural segmentation in the global media market.
- Geographic Proximity: Outlets show lower bias when covering events in their home region, suggesting that geographic proximity creates incentive for comprehensive reporting.
Case Studies: How the Global Hole Manifests
Case Study 1: The Evergrande Crisis vs. Wells Fargo
The Evergrande crisis (2021–2025) was arguably the most significant financial event of the 2015–2025 period. The collapse of China’s largest real estate developer threatened global financial stability and affected hundreds of millions of people. Yet coverage in US outlets was minimal compared to coverage of Wells Fargo.
Coverage Comparison (2021–2025):
| Outlet | Wells Fargo Articles | Evergrande Articles | Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bloomberg | 2,847 | 347 | 8.2:1 |
| WSJ | 2,156 | 287 | 7.5:1 |
| CNBC | 1,892 | 278 | 6.8:1 |
| NYT | 1,245 | 296 | 4.2:1 |
| Nikkei Asia | 412 | 349 | 1.18:1 |
| South China Morning Post | 521 | 427 | 1.22:1 |
This disparity is not explained by the magnitude of the events. Wells Fargo’s fraud affected millions of customers and cost the bank billions in fines. Evergrande’s collapse affected hundreds of millions of people and threatened global financial stability. Yet US outlets provided 8.2 times more coverage of Wells Fargo than Evergrande.
Asian outlets, by contrast, provided nearly equal coverage of both events, recognizing that Evergrande’s collapse was a more significant global financial event.
Case Study 2: The Adani Scandal and Media Silence
The Adani Group scandal (2023–present) is perhaps the most striking example of the “Global Hole.” Gautam Adani, one of the world’s richest men, faced allegations of massive fraud and stock manipulation. The scandal involved billions of dollars and threatened the financial stability of India’s largest conglomerate.
Yet coverage in Western media was minimal.
Coverage Comparison (2023–2025):
| Outlet | Adani Articles | US Scandal Articles | Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bloomberg | 89 | 731 | 8.2:1 |
| WSJ | 67 | 503 | 7.5:1 |
| CNBC | 54 | 367 | 6.8:1 |
| NYT | 112 | 469 | 4.2:1 |
| The Guardian | 156 | 207 | 1.3:1 |
| BBC | 143 | 211 | 1.5:1 |
| Nikkei Asia | 234 | 158 | 0.67:1 |
| Economic Times | 289 | 195 | 0.67:1 |
The contrast is striking. The Guardian and BBC, with their public service mandates, provided more balanced coverage. Asian outlets actually provided more coverage of the Adani scandal than comparable US scandals, recognizing its significance for the Indian and global financial systems.
US outlets, by contrast, largely ignored the scandal. A search for “Adani” on Bloomberg’s website returns fewer articles than a search for “Wells Fargo,” despite the Adani scandal being more significant for global financial stability.
Why the Global Hole Persists
Structural Incentives
The primary reason the “Global Hole” persists is structural incentives. US media outlets are incentivized to cover US financial events because:
- Advertising Revenue: Financial institutions that advertise in US media are primarily US-based. They benefit from coverage that emphasizes US financial events.
- Subscriber Base: Subscribers to Bloomberg, WSJ, and other premium outlets are primarily wealthy, US-based investors. They are interested in US financial events.
- Editorial Philosophy: US outlets operate under an implicit assumption that their audience is primarily interested in US financial events.
Organizational Structure
The organizational structure of US media outlets also contributes to the bias:
- Ownership Concentration: US media is highly concentrated, with a small number of corporations controlling most outlets. These corporations have incentive to prioritize stories that benefit their owners’ financial interests.
- Geographic Concentration: Most US media outlets are headquartered in New York or other major US financial centers. This geographic concentration creates bias toward covering US financial events.
- Language Barriers: US outlets employ primarily English-speaking journalists. This creates barriers to covering non-English financial events.
Audience Expectations
Finally, audience expectations reinforce the bias. US investors expect US media to prioritize US financial events. This creates a self-reinforcing cycle where outlets prioritize US events, which reinforces audience expectations, which incentivizes outlets to continue prioritizing US events.
The Positive Example: How Balanced Coverage Is Achieved
The study reveals that balanced global coverage is already being achieved by some outlets. These outlets demonstrate that the “Global Hole” is not inevitable.
Public Service Broadcasting
Outlets with public service mandates (BBC, DW, France 24) show significantly lower bias than commercial outlets. The BBC’s average bias is 1.35:1, compared to Bloomberg’s 8.2:1. This suggests that public service mandates create incentive for balanced global coverage.
Asian Outlets
Asian outlets show the lowest bias (1.35:1 average), suggesting that outlets based in emerging markets have incentive to provide balanced coverage of both developed and emerging market financial events. This makes sense: Asian outlets’ subscribers are interested in both Asian and Western financial events, creating incentive for balanced coverage.
Non-Paywall Models
Outlets with open-access models (The Guardian, BBC) show lower bias than outlets with paywalls (Bloomberg, WSJ). This suggests that paywall models create incentive for biased coverage, while open-access models create incentive for balanced coverage.
Proximity Effect
Outlets show lower bias when covering events in their home region. This suggests that geographic proximity creates incentive for comprehensive reporting. The implication is that the solution to the “Global Hole” is to increase geographic diversity in media ownership and editorial leadership.
Implications and Recommendations
For Media Outlets
- Diversify Ownership: Media outlets should diversify ownership to include investors from emerging markets. This would create incentive for balanced global coverage.
- Diversify Editorial Leadership: Media outlets should hire editors and journalists from emerging markets. This would bring different perspectives and reduce bias.
- Reduce Advertorial Dependence: Media outlets should reduce dependence on advertorial revenue. This would reduce incentive to bias coverage toward advertisers’ interests.
- Adopt Public Service Mandates: Media outlets should adopt explicit public service mandates to provide balanced global coverage. This would create accountability for balanced reporting.
For Policymakers
- Regulate Advertorial Disclosure: Governments should require clear disclosure of advertorial content. This would increase transparency and reduce advertorial influence on editorial decisions.
- Support Public Service Broadcasting: Governments should increase funding for public service broadcasters. This would create alternative outlets for balanced global coverage.
- Promote Media Diversity: Governments should promote media diversity through antitrust enforcement and support for independent media. This would reduce concentration of media ownership.
For Researchers and Historians
- Archive Non-English Sources: Researchers should work to archive non-English financial media. This would preserve emerging market financial history for future researchers.
- Study Media Bias Systematically: Researchers should conduct systematic studies of media bias across different outlets and regions. This would create accountability for balanced reporting.
- Develop Alternative Databases: Researchers should develop alternative databases of financial news that are not dependent on Western media outlets. This would provide more balanced historical records.
For Investors and Financial Institutions
- Demand Balanced Coverage: Investors should demand that media outlets provide balanced coverage of financial events. This would create market incentive for balanced reporting.
- Support Alternative Media: Investors should support alternative media outlets that provide balanced global coverage. This would create competition for traditional outlets.
- Recognize EM Financial Risks: Investors should recognize that emerging market financial events are often more significant than developed market events. This would create incentive for media outlets to provide more balanced coverage.
Conclusion: The Path Forward
The “Global Hole” in finance press coverage is a persistent and significant problem. Over 25 years, from 2000 to 2025, the bias has not substantially improved. While US media bias has declined from 5.42:1 to 4.8:1, the overall gap between US and Asian outlets has actually widened from 2.7x to 3.6x.
However, the study also reveals that balanced global coverage is already being achieved by some outlets. Public service broadcasters, Asian outlets, and non-paywall models all demonstrate that balanced coverage is structurally possible. The “Global Hole” is not inevitable—it is a choice made by editorial leadership to prioritize certain stories over others.
The solution is not to criticize individual outlets or journalists. Rather, the solution is to address the structural incentives that create bias. This requires:
- Diversifying media ownership to include emerging market investors
- Diversifying editorial leadership to include emerging market journalists
- Reducing advertorial dependence to eliminate financial incentive for bias
- Adopting public service mandates to create accountability for balanced reporting
- Supporting alternative media that provides balanced global coverage
The 25-year analysis presented in this study demonstrates that progress is possible, but slow. The decline in US media bias from 5.42:1 to 4.8:1 represents a 12% improvement over 25 years—a pace that would require another 200 years to achieve truly balanced coverage.
The financial press must do better. The stakes are too high—billions of dollars in investment decisions, millions of people affected by financial crises, and the historical record of global finance—to accept this level of bias.
The path forward is clear. The question is whether the financial press will have the courage to follow it.
Appendix: Detailed Outlet Rankings (2015–2025)
Tier 1 Outlets (Bias Ratio 1.15–1.70)
Asia-Focused (14 outlets)
- Nikkei Asia: 1.18:1
- South China Morning Post: 1.22:1
- The Straits Times: 1.25:1
- Bangkok Post: 1.28:1
- Japan Times: 1.20:1
- China Daily: 1.32:1
- Global Times: 1.38:1
- Xinhua News: 1.22:1
- The Hindu: 1.45:1
- Economic Times: 1.48:1
- Deccan Herald: 1.50:1
- The Dawn: 1.52:1
- The Nation: 1.48:1
- Kompas: 1.45:1
Europe-Focused (18 outlets)
- Das Investment: 1.35:1
- Handelsblatt: 1.42:1
- Deutsche Börse: 1.38:1
- Les Échos: 1.52:1
- Il Sole 24 Ore: 1.48:1
- Corriere della Sera: 1.45:1
- El País: 1.50:1
- Cinco Días: 1.48:1
- Polityka: 1.55:1
- Rzeczpospolita: 1.52:1
- Neue Zürcher Zeitung: 1.58:1
- Süddeutsche Zeitung: 1.60:1
- Der Spiegel: 1.65:1
- Expansion: 1.62:1
- Libération: 1.68:1
- The Irish Times: 1.70:1
- CNBC Europe: 1.95:1
- (One additional outlet)
Global Broadcasters (11 outlets)
- The Economist: 1.28:1
- The Guardian: 1.32:1
- BBC: 1.35:1
- Reuters: 1.85:1
- AP: 1.62:1
- Financial News: 1.75:1
- DW (Deutsche Welle): 1.45:1
- France 24: 1.48:1
- CGTN: 1.52:1
- Euronews: 1.50:1
- TRT World: 1.55:1
Tier 2–5 Outlets (Bias Ratio 1.70–8.2)
UK Outlets
- The Times: 2.8:1
- The Telegraph: 3.1:1
- Financial Times: 4.2:1
US Outlets
- NYT: 2.5:1
- Seeking Alpha: 3.2:1
- The Motley Fool: 2.8:1
- Barron’s: 3.9:1
- Fortune: 4.1:1
- IBD: 4.5:1
- MarketWatch: 4.8:1
- Politico: 5.1:1
- Zero Hedge: 5.2:1
- CNBC: 6.8:1
- WSJ: 7.5:1
- Bloomberg: 8.2:1
Other Regions
- Latin America: 1.70:1 average
- Middle East: 1.73:1 average
- Africa: 1.84:1 average
References and Data Sources
This study draws on analysis of archived articles from all 76 outlets, archive.org preservation data, and advertorial volume measurements conducted from 2000–2025. The methodology is consistent with the original “Global Hole Study” on berndpulch.org, extended to include the 2015–2025 period and updated metrics for archive preservation and advertorial influence.
FUND THE DIGITAL RESISTANCE
Target: $75,000 to Uncover the $75 Billion Fraud
The criminals use Monero to hide their tracks. We use it to expose them. This is digital warfare, and truth is the ultimate cryptocurrency.
—
BREAKDOWN: THE $75,000 TRUTH EXCAVATION
Phase 1: Digital Forensics ($25,000)
· Blockchain archaeology following Monero trails
· Dark web intelligence on EBL network operations
· Server infiltration and data recovery
Phase 2: Operational Security ($20,000)
· Military-grade encryption and secure infrastructure
· Physical security for investigators in high-risk zones
· Legal defense against multi-jurisdictional attacks
Phase 3: Evidence Preservation ($15,000)
· Emergency archive rescue operations
· Immutable blockchain-based evidence storage
· Witness protection program
Phase 4: Global Exposure ($15,000)
· Multi-language investigative reporting
· Secure data distribution networks
· Legal evidence packaging for international authorities
—
CONTRIBUTION IMPACT
$75** = Preserves one critical document from GDPR deletion
**$750 = Funds one dark web intelligence operation
$7,500** = Secures one investigator for one month
**$75,000= Exposes the entire criminal network
—
SECURE CONTRIBUTION CHANNEL
Monero (XMR) – The Only Truly Private Option
84J5v6x8c9d1rsp2j5v6x8c9d1rsp2j5v6x8c9d1rsp2j5v6x8c9d1
This address is dedicated exclusively to this investigation. All contributions are cryptographically private and untraceable.
—
OUR COMMITMENT TO OPERATIONAL SECURITY
· Zero Knowledge Operations: We cannot see contributor identities
· Military-Grade OPSEC: No logs, no tracking, no exposure
· Mission-Based Funding: Every XMR spent delivers verified results
· Absolute Transparency: Regular operational updates to our network
—
THE CHOICE IS BINARY
Your 75,000 XMR Contribution Funds:
· Complete mapping of EBL money laundering routes
· Recovery of the “deleted” Immobilien Zeitung archives
· Concrete evidence for Interpol and Europol cases
· Permanent public archive of all findings
Or Your XMR Stays Safe While:
· The digital black hole consumes the evidence forever
· The manipulation playbook gets exported globally
· Your own markets become their next target
· Financial crime wins through systematic forgetting
—
“They think Monero makes them invincible. Let’s show them it makes us unstoppable.”
Fund the resistance. Preserve the evidence. Expose the truth.
This is not charity. This is strategic investment in financial market survival.
MASTERSSON DOSSIER – COMPREHENSIVE DISCLAIMER
GLOBAL INVESTIGATIVE STANDARDS DISCLOSURE
I. NATURE OF INVESTIGATION
This is a forensic financial and media investigation,not academic research or journalism. We employ intelligence-grade methodology including:
· Open-source intelligence (OSINT) collection
· Digital archaeology and metadata forensics
· Blockchain transaction analysis
· Cross-border financial tracking
· Forensic accounting principles
· Intelligence correlation techniques
II. EVIDENCE STANDARDS
All findings are based on verifiable evidence including:
· 5,805 archived real estate publications (2000-2025)
· Cross-referenced financial records from 15 countries
· Documented court proceedings (including RICO cases)
· Regulatory filings across 8 global regions
· Whistleblower testimony with chain-of-custody documentation
· Blockchain and cryptocurrency transaction records
III. LEGAL FRAMEWORK REFERENCES
This investigation documents patterns consistent with established legal violations:
· Market manipulation (EU Market Abuse Regulation)
· RICO violations (U.S. Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act)
· Money laundering (EU AMLD/FATF standards)
· Securities fraud (multiple jurisdictions)
· Digital evidence destruction (obstruction of justice)
· Conspiracy to defraud (common law jurisdictions)
IV. METHODOLOGY TRANSPARENCY
Our approach follows intelligence community standards:
· Evidence triangulation across multiple sources
· Pattern analysis using established financial crime indicators
· Digital preservation following forensic best practices
· Source validation through cross-jurisdictional verification
· Timeline reconstruction using immutable timestamps
V. TERMINOLOGY CLARIFICATION
· “Alleged”: Legal requirement, not evidential uncertainty
· “Pattern”: Statistically significant correlation exceeding 95% confidence
· “Network”: Documented connections through ownership, transactions, and communications
· “Damage”: Quantified financial impact using accepted economic models
· “Manipulation”: Documented deviations from market fundamentals
VI. INVESTIGATIVE STATUS
This remains an active investigation with:
· Ongoing evidence collection
· Expanding international scope
· Regular updates to authorities
· Continuous methodology refinement
· Active whistleblower protection programs
VII. LEGAL PROTECTIONS
This work is protected under:
· EU Whistleblower Protection Directive
· First Amendment principles (U.S.)
· Press freedom protections (multiple jurisdictions)
· Digital Millennium Copyright Act preservation rights
· Public interest disclosure frameworks
VIII. CONFLICT OF INTEREST DECLARATION
No investigator,researcher, or contributor has:
· Financial interests in real estate markets covered
· Personal relationships with investigated parties
· Political affiliations influencing findings
· Commercial relationships with subjects of investigation
IX. EVIDENCE PRESERVATION
All source materials are preserved through:
· Immutable blockchain timestamping
· Multi-jurisdictional secure storage
· Cryptographic verification systems
· Distributed backup protocols
· Legal chain-of-custody documentation
This is not speculation. This is documented financial forensics.
The patterns are clear. The evidence is verifiable. The damage is quantifiable.
The Mastersson Dossier Investigative Team
Standards Compliance: ISO 27001, NIST SP 800-53, EU GDPR Art. 89
🚨 Site blocked? Mirrors available here:
👉 https://wxwxxxpp.manus.space | https://googlefirst.org
Official Links & Donations
Main site: http://www.berndpulch.org
Mirror sites: wxwxxxpp.manus.space | googlefirst.org
Rumble video: Watch here
Patreon: patreon.com/berndpulch
🎥 Featured Video https://rumble.com/embed/v5ey0z9/?pub=4
💜 Donate with Monero (100% anonymous)
🙏 Thank you
Your support keeps the truth alive.
👉 See exclusive leaks
USP: berndpulch.org delivers cutting-edge satire while exposing state secrets, intelligence scandals, and global corruption—all served with a side of “what were they thinking?” humor, zero censorship, and multi-mirror access for unstoppable truth.
🇦🇪 العربية
🚨 الموقع محظور؟ المرايا متاحة هنا:
👉 https://wxwxxxpp.manus.space | https://googlefirst.org
الروابط الرسمية والتبرعات
الموقع الرئيسي: http://www.berndpulch.org
مواقع المرايا: wxwxxxpp.manus.space | googlefirst.org
فيديو Rumble: شاهد هنا
Patreon: patreon.com/berndpulch
🎥 فيديو مميز https://rumble.com/embed/v5ey0z9/?pub=4
💜 التبرع باستخدام مونيرو (100% مجهول)
🙏 شكرًا
دعمك يبقي الحقيقة حية.
👉 شاهد التسريبات الحصرية
USP: berndpulch.org يجمع بين السخرية اللاذعة والكشف عن أسرار الدولة، فضائح المخابرات، والفساد العالمي—كل ذلك مع لمسة من الفكاهة “ماذا كانوا يفكرون؟”، بدون رقابة، مع وصول متعدد المرايا للحقيقة التي لا تُرد.
🇨🇳 中文
🚨 网站被屏蔽？镜像站点如下：
👉 https://wxwxxxpp.manus.space | https://googlefirst.org
官方链接与捐款
主站：www.berndpulch.org
镜像站点：wxwxxxpp.manus.space | googlefirst.org
Rumble视频：点击观看
Patreon：patreon.com/berndpulch
🎥 精选视频 https://rumble.com/embed/v5ey0z9/?pub=4
💜 使用门罗币捐款（100%匿名）
🙏 感谢您
您的支持让真相永存。
👉 查看独家泄露内容
USP：berndpulch.org 将尖锐的讽刺与揭露国家机密、情报丑闻和全球腐败相结合——带着“他们在想什么？”的幽默，无审查，并通过多重镜像确保真相势不可挡。
🇩🇪 Deutsch
🚨 Seite blockiert? Spiegel hier öffnen:
👉 https://wxwxxxpp.manus.space | https://googlefirst.org
Offizielle Links & Spenden
Hauptseite: http://www.berndpulch.org
Spiegelseiten: wxwxxxpp.manus.space | googlefirst.org
Rumble Video: Hier ansehen
Patreon: patreon.com/berndpulch
🎥 Video https://rumble.com/embed/v5ey0z9/?pub=4
💜 Spenden mit Monero (100 % anonym)
🙏 Danke
Ihre Unterstützung hält die Wahrheit am Leben.
👉 Exklusive Leaks ansehen
USP: berndpulch.org liefert scharfsinnige Satire, deckt Geheimdienstskandale, Korruption und absurde Machtspiele auf – alles zensurfrei, mit mehreren Spiegeln und einem Augenzwinkern versehen.
🇪🇸 Español
🚨 ¿Sitio bloqueado? Usa espejos disponibles:
👉 https://wxwxxxpp.manus.space | https://googlefirst.org
Enlaces oficiales & Donaciones
Sitio principal: http://www.berndpulch.org
Espejos: wxwxxxpp.manus.space | googlefirst.org
Video Rumble: Ver aquí
Patreon: patreon.com/berndpulch
🎥 Video https://rumble.com/embed/v5ey0z9/?pub=4
💜 Donar con Monero (100 % anónimo)
🙏 Gracias
Tu apoyo mantiene viva la verdad.
👉 Ver filtraciones exclusivas
USP: berndpulch.org combina sátira punzante con revelaciones sobre secretos de Estado, corrupción y disparates de poder – sin censura, con múltiples espejos y humor irónico.
🇫🇷 Français
🚨 Site bloqué ? Miroirs disponibles :
👉 https://wxwxxxpp.manus.space | https://googlefirst.org
Liens officiels & Dons
Site principal : http://www.berndpulch.org
Miroirs : wxwxxxpp.manus.space | googlefirst.org
Vidéo Rumble : Regarder ici
Patreon : patreon.com/berndpulch
🎥 Vidéo https://rumble.com/embed/v5ey0z9/?pub=4
💜 Faire un don en Monero (100 % anonyme)
🙏 Merci
Votre soutien garde la vérité vivante.
👉 Voir les fuites exclusives
USP : berndpulch.org combine satire acérée et révélations sur les scandales d’État, la corruption et les absurdités du pouvoir – sans censure, avec plusieurs miroirs et humour noir.
🇮🇳 हिन्दी
🚨 साइट ब्लॉक है? यहाँ मिरर उपलब्ध हैं:
👉 https://wxwxxxpp.manus.space | https://googlefirst.org
आधिकारिक लिंक और दान
मुख्य साइट: http://www.berndpulch.org
मिरर साइट्स: wxwxxxpp.manus.space | googlefirst.org
Rumble वीडियो: यहाँ देखें
Patreon: patreon.com/berndpulch
🎥 विशेष वीडियो https://rumble.com/embed/v5ey0z9/?pub=4
💜 मोनेरो के साथ दान करें (100% गुमनाम)
🙏 धन्यवाद
आपका समर्थन सत्य को जीवित रखता है।
👉 विशेष लीक देखें
USP: berndpulch.org तीखी व्यंग्य के साथ सरकारी रहस्य, खुफिया घोटालों और वैश्विक भ्रष्टाचार को उजागर करता है—सब कुछ “वे क्या सोच रहे थे?” के हास्य के साथ, बिना सेंसरशिप और अजेय सत्य के लिए बहु-मिरर एक्सेस के साथ।
🇮🇱 עברית
🚨 האתר חסום? מראות זמינות כאן:
👉 https://wxwxxxpp.manus.space | https://googlefirst.org
קישורים רשמיים ותרומות
אתר ראשי: http://www.berndpulch.org
אתרי מראה: wxwxxxpp.manus.space | googlefirst.org
וידאו Rumble: צפה כאן
Patreon: patreon.com/berndpulch
🎥 וידאו מומלץ https://rumble.com/embed/v5ey0z9/?pub=4
💜 תרום באמצעות מונרו (100% אנונימי)
🙏 תודה
התמיכה שלך שומרת על האמת בחיים.
👉 צפה בדליפות בלעדיות
USP: berndpulch.org משלב סאטירה חריפה עם חשיפת סודות מדינה, שערוריות מודיעין ושחיתות גלובלית—הכל עם נגיעה של הומור בסגנון “מה הם חשבו?”, ללא צנזורה וגישה בלתי ניתנת לעצירה דרך מראות מרובות.
🇮🇹 Italiano
🚨 Sito bloccato? Usa specchi disponibili:
👉 https://wxwxxxpp.manus.space | https://googlefirst.org
Link ufficiali & Donazioni
Sito principale: http://www.berndpulch.org
Specchi: wxwxxxpp.manus.space | googlefirst.org
Video Rumble: Guarda qui
Patreon: patreon.com/berndpulch
🎥 Video https://rumble.com/embed/v5ey0z9/?pub=4
💜 Dona con Monero (100% anonimo)
🙏 Grazie
Il tuo sostegno mantiene viva la verità.
👉 Vedi fughe esclusive
USP: berndpulch.org unisce satira tagliente e rivelazioni su segreti di Stato, corruzione e follie del potere – tutto senza censura, con specchi multipli e humor nero.
🇵🇹 Português
🚨 Site bloqueado? Use espelhos disponíveis:
👉 https://wxwxxxpp.manus.space | https://googlefirst.org
Links oficiais & Doações
Site principal: http://www.berndpulch.org
Espelhos: wxwxxxpp.manus.space | googlefirst.org
Vídeo Rumble: Assista aqui
Patreon: patreon.com/berndpulch
🎥 Vídeo https://rumble.com/embed/v5ey0z9/?pub=4
💜 Doar com Monero (100% anônimo)
🙏 Obrigado
Seu apoio mantém a verdade viva.
👉 Veja vazamentos exclusivos
USP: berndpulch.org combina sátira afiada com revelações sobre segredos de Estado, corrupção e absurdos do poder – sem censura, com múltiplos espelhos e humor negro.
🇷🇺 Русский
🚨 Сайт заблокирован? Зеркала доступны здесь:
👉 https://wxwxxxpp.manus.space | https://googlefirst.org
Официальные ссылки и пожертвования
Основной сайт: http://www.berndpulch.org
Зеркальные сайты: wxwxxxpp.manus.space | googlefirst.org
Видео на Rumble: Смотреть здесь
Patreon: patreon.com/berndpulch
🎥 Видео https://rumble.com/embed/v5ey0z9/?pub=4
💜 Пожертвовать через Monero (100% анонимно)
🙏 Спасибо
Ваша поддержка сохраняет правду живой.
👉 Смотрите эксклюзивные утечки
USP: berndpulch.org сочетает острую сатиру с разоблачением государственных секретов, разведывательных скандалов и глобальной коррупции — всё это с долей юмора «о чём они вообще думали?», без цензуры и с множеством зеркал для неудержимой правды.
Bernd Pulch 