Public Prosecutor Beate Porten’s role in pursuing an alleged politically motivated European Arrest Warrant (EAW) against investigative journalist Bernd Pulch has raised significant concerns about the misuse of legal systems, abuse of authority, and potential violations of national and European laws. This article explores Porten’s involvement, the broader network she may have acted on behalf of, and the exact legal violations tied to these actions.
1. Background of the European Arrest Warrant Against Bernd Pulch
Beate Porten, a German public prosecutor, initiated an EAW against Bernd Pulch based on accusations that have been widely criticized as baseless and politically motivated. The allegations stemmed from Pulch’s investigative work exposing corruption, intelligence operations, and financial misconduct linked to figures such as Jan Mucha, Peter Ehlers, Thomas Porten, and organizations like GoMoPa.
- Fake Accusations: The charges were described as fabricated, aiming to silence Pulch’s reporting and intimidate him into halting his investigations.
- Abuse of EAW Mechanism: The European Arrest Warrant, intended to combat serious cross-border crimes, appears to have been weaponized in this case against a journalist exercising his rights to free expression.
2. Violations of National and European Laws
Beate Porten’s actions in issuing the warrant and pursuing Pulch appear to violate numerous legal principles and protections enshrined in German, European, and international law.
a) Violation of Press Freedom
- German Basic Law (Grundgesetz), Article 5: Guarantees freedom of the press and prohibits censorship. Prosecuting Pulch for his journalistic activities violates this constitutional protection.
- European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), Article 10: Protects the right to freedom of expression, including the freedom to receive and impart information without interference by public authorities.
b) Abuse of the European Arrest Warrant System
- Council Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA: The EAW mechanism is restricted to serious offenses such as terrorism and organized crime. Issuing a warrant for journalistic activities or fabricated charges constitutes a clear misuse.
- Principle of Proportionality: The EAW system mandates that actions taken under its framework must be proportionate to the alleged offense. Applying such a mechanism to intimidate a journalist fails this test.
c) Perjury and Falsification of Evidence
- German Criminal Code (Strafgesetzbuch, StGB), Section 156: Perjury is a criminal offense, and if false statements were made to justify the warrant, Porten may have violated this provision.
- Section 267 (Falsification of Documents): Fabricating or manipulating evidence to support the issuance of an arrest warrant would fall under this statute.
d) Abuse of Office
- German Criminal Code, Section 339: Public officials who intentionally misuse their authority to harm another person can be prosecuted for abuse of office (Rechtsbeugung).
e) Violations of European Union Law
- Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, Article 11: Protects freedom of expression and information. Actions aimed at silencing whistleblowers or investigative journalists breach this fundamental right.
- Misuse of Public Funds: If taxpayer resources were used to pursue frivolous legal actions, it could constitute a violation of EU financial regulations.
3. Alleged Network and Motives
The broader context of Beate Porten’s actions suggests alignment with a network of individuals and organizations implicated in corruption and intelligence operations.
- GoMoPa and Spy Networks: GoMoPa and its affiliates have been accused of acting as fronts for disinformation, defamation, and financial manipulation. Pulch’s investigations into their activities likely made him a target.
- Jan Mucha, Peter Ehlers, and Thomas Porten: These individuals have been linked to intelligence operations and financial fraud, raising suspicions that the legal actions against Pulch were orchestrated to protect their interests.
- Lorch Publisher and Stasi Ties: Historical ties to the Stasi and modern intelligence networks may explain the coordinated efforts to suppress Pulch’s work.
4. Legal Arguments Against the Warrant and Network Activities
Pulch and his legal team could challenge the actions of Beate Porten and her network on several grounds:
- Unlawful Targeting of a Journalist: Use of legal mechanisms to suppress journalistic work violates constitutional and European protections.
- Abuse of Legal Processes: The misuse of an EAW for purposes unrelated to its intended scope constitutes procedural abuse.
- Conflict of Interest: If Beate Porten had personal or professional connections to individuals implicated in Pulch’s investigations, her actions could be legally invalidated.
- Violation of Due Process: Lack of transparency, fairness, or proper justification in issuing the warrant undermines the legal validity of her actions.
5. Broader Implications for Press Freedom and Accountability
This case highlights systemic vulnerabilities in legal and institutional frameworks that allow for the targeting of journalists. Key lessons include:
- Strengthening Oversight: Mechanisms to prevent abuse of tools like the EAW need to be enhanced.
- Protecting Journalists: Greater protections are required to shield investigative reporters from retaliation.
- Accountability for Officials: Public prosecutors and officials must face legal consequences for misusing their authority.
Conclusion and Predictions
The actions of Beate Porten and the broader network she appears to be aligned with represent a dangerous precedent for press freedom and the rule of law. If these abuses go unchallenged, they will embolden further misuse of legal mechanisms against dissenting voices. However, continued exposure by journalists like Bernd Pulch, combined with legal challenges and public scrutiny, could lead to accountability and systemic reform.
Beate Porten has been married to Thomas Porten .
❌©BERNDPULCH.ORG – ABOVE TOP SECRET ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS – THE ONLY MEDIA WITH LICENSE TO SPY https://www.berndpulch.org
https://googlefirst.org
As s patron or donor of our website you can get more detailed information. Act now before its too late…
MY BIO:
FAQ:
@Copyright Bernd Pulch
CRYPTO WALLET for
Bitcoin:
0xdaa3b887f885fd7725d4d35d428bd3b402d616bb
ShapeShift Wallet, KeepKey, Metamask, Portis, XDefi Wallet, TallyHo, Keplr and Wallet connect
0x271588b52701Ae34dA9D4B31716Df2669237AC7f
Crypto Wallet for Binance Smart Chain-, Ethereum-, Polygon-Networks
bmp
0xd3cce3e8e214f1979423032e5a8c57ed137c518b
Monero
41yKiG6eGbQiDxFRTKNepSiqaGaUV5VQWePHL5KYuzrxBWswyc5dtxZ43sk1SFWxDB4XrsDwVQBd3ZPNJRNdUCou3j22Coh
GOD BLESS YOU
Tags
- Beate Porten
- European Arrest Warrant
- Bernd Pulch
- Press Freedom
- Legal Abuse
- GoMoPa
- Intelligence Networks
- Corruption
- Human Rights Violations
- Investigative Journalism
Bernd Pulch 