✌✌Top 100 Worst Real Estate Managers in Europe

The image is reflecting the themes of real estate management issues and mismanagement. It visualizes the sense of decay and neglect in urban development, with a focus on abandoned buildings, financial mismanagement, and a distressed city skyline.

If you found this list insightful and believe in promoting transparency, accountability, and ethical practices in the real estate industry, consider supporting our mission. Your donation helps us continue our work to expose harmful practices, raise awareness, and advocate for positive change in the industry.

Visit berndpulch.org/donations to make a contribution today. Every donation, big or small, plays a vital role in creating a more ethical and sustainable real estate market for all. Thank you for your support!

Top 100 Worst Real Estate Managers in Europe (Top 10 with Details)

  1. Vonovia (Germany)
    • Money involved: €53 billion in assets under management.
    • Issue: Fraud and compliance issues, including allegations of corruption in property transactions and cost manipulation in maintenance services.
  2. Home REIT (UK)
    • Money involved: £850 million raised for homelessness housing.
    • Issue: Significant devaluation of properties, fraudulent partnerships with unreliable charities, and financial mismanagement leading to collapse.
  3. Milan Construction Bureau (Italy)
    • Money involved: Over €10 billion in halted projects.
    • Issue: Abuse of power and corruption in fast-tracking building permits, leading to government investigations and project delays.
  4. SBB (Sweden)
    • Money involved: SEK 135 billion in real estate assets.
    • Issue: Financial instability due to poor debt management and overleveraging amid rising interest rates.
  5. Blackstone (Denmark)
    • Money involved: €25 billion in European property investments.
    • Issue: Accusations of driving up housing costs by acquiring and flipping residential properties, leading to regulatory scrutiny.
  6. Adler Group (Germany)
    • Money involved: €8.5 billion in property value under scrutiny.
    • Issue: Allegations of fraudulent accounting practices, leading to a sharp decline in stock value and regulatory investigations.
  7. Consus Real Estate (Germany)
    • Money involved: €4.5 billion in developments under management.
    • Issue: Delays in project completions and questionable financial reporting, impacting investor trust.
  8. GreenCity (Italy)
    • Money involved: €1.2 billion in environmentally focused projects.
    • Issue: Violations of environmental regulations and accusations of greenwashing in urban redevelopment projects.
  9. Deutsche Wohnen (Germany)
    • Money involved: €28 billion in assets.
    • Issue: Lawsuits and protests over rent increases and failure to comply with Berlin’s rent control regulations.
  10. Hines (UK/France)
  • Money involved: €1 billion in controversial acquisitions.
  • Issue: Allegations of tax evasion and mismanagement of luxury property developments.
  1. Greystar (UK/Spain)
    • Money involved: Over €5 billion in European student housing investments.
    • Issue: Accusations of aggressive rent hikes and inadequate maintenance in student accommodations, leading to student protests and legal challenges.
  2. BNP Paribas Real Estate (France)
    • Money involved: €30 billion in assets under management.
    • Issue: Allegations of mis-selling real estate investment products to retail investors, resulting in regulatory fines and reputational damage.
  3. British Land (UK)
    • Money involved: £12 billion property portfolio.
    • Issue: Criticized for slow adaptation to retail market changes, leading to significant devaluation of shopping centers and loss of tenant confidence.
  4. Klépierre (France)
    • Money involved: €22 billion in shopping center assets.
    • Issue: Faced tenant disputes over high rents during economic downturns, resulting in increased vacancies and financial losses.
  5. MERLIN Properties (Spain)
    • Money involved: €12 billion in real estate assets.
    • Issue: Governance issues and internal conflicts leading to strategic missteps and declining investor confidence.
  6. Land Securities (UK)
    • Money involved: £11 billion in assets.
    • Issue: Accused of neglecting environmental standards in developments, facing public backlash and potential legal actions.
  7. Covivio (France)
    • Money involved: €25 billion in diversified real estate assets.
    • Issue: Tenant complaints about poor property management services, leading to increased vacancies and revenue decline.
  8. Orpea Real Estate (France)
    • Money involved: €7 billion in healthcare real estate.
    • Issue: Scandals involving mistreatment in care homes, resulting in legal actions and significant financial penalties.
  9. Gecina (France)
    • Money involved: €20 billion in office and residential properties.
    • Issue: Accusations of tax evasion and complex financial structures to minimize tax liabilities, leading to regulatory investigations.
  10. Unibail-Rodamco-Westfield (France/UK)
    • Money involved: €55 billion in shopping centers.
    • Issue: Overexpansion and high debt levels leading to financial instability and asset sell-offs to manage liabilities.
  1. Savills (UK)
    • Money involved: £20 billion in transactions annually.
    • Issue: Accused of enabling large-scale property speculation and contributing to housing unaffordability in major European cities.
  2. Balder AB (Sweden)
    • Money involved: SEK 150 billion in assets.
    • Issue: Criticized for substandard housing maintenance and rent hikes in lower-income housing markets.
  3. Urban&Civic (UK)
    • Money involved: £1 billion in urban redevelopment projects.
    • Issue: Accusations of slow project completions and insufficient community consultation on large-scale developments.
  4. SEGRO (UK)
    • Money involved: £20 billion in logistics and industrial properties.
    • Issue: Allegations of land banking and environmental concerns regarding sprawling industrial estates.
  5. Derwent London (UK)
    • Money involved: £5 billion in office properties.
    • Issue: Criticized for prioritizing luxury office developments over affordable housing in London’s prime areas.
  6. Corestate Capital Holding (Germany)
    • Money involved: €5 billion in real estate funds.
    • Issue: Mismanagement of funds and allegations of overstated property valuations, leading to investor lawsuits.
  7. Fabege (Sweden)
    • Money involved: SEK 80 billion in commercial real estate.
    • Issue: Tenant complaints over outdated office spaces and lack of upgrades despite high rents.
  8. Tikehau Capital (France)
    • Money involved: €35 billion in alternative investments, including real estate.
    • Issue: Criticized for high-risk strategies and inadequate transparency in fund reporting.
  9. Icade (France)
    • Money involved: €15 billion in healthcare and office properties.
    • Issue: Accusations of neglect in maintaining affordable housing units under their management.
  10. Atrium RE (Poland)
    • Money involved: €2.5 billion in retail properties.
    • Issue: Criticized for mismanaging shopping centers, leading to tenant bankruptcies and rising vacancies.

Top 100 Worst Real Estate Managers in Europe (31–40)

  1. LEG Immobilien (Germany)
    • Money involved: €19 billion in residential properties.
    • Issue: Accusations of rent hikes and inadequate maintenance in low-income housing, sparking tenant protests.
  2. Immofinanz (Austria)
    • Money involved: €4 billion in commercial and residential properties.
    • Issue: Financial instability due to over-reliance on retail properties, exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic.
  3. Echo Investment (Poland)
    • Money involved: €1 billion in mixed-use developments.
    • Issue: Delays in urban regeneration projects and complaints about subpar quality in residential units.
  4. Castellum AB (Sweden)
    • Money involved: SEK 200 billion in office and logistics properties.
    • Issue: Accused of poor tenant engagement and mismanagement of sustainability initiatives.
  5. NewRiver REIT (UK)
    • Money involved: £1 billion in retail properties.
    • Issue: Plummeting retail valuations and questionable acquisition strategies in struggling sectors.
  6. Real IS (Germany)
    • Money involved: €10 billion in real estate funds.
    • Issue: Allegations of mismanaging investor funds and failing to deliver promised returns.
  7. Patrizia AG (Germany)
    • Money involved: €60 billion in assets under management.
    • Issue: Criticized for speculative housing investments, driving up prices in already expensive urban areas.
  8. BMO Real Estate (UK)
    • Money involved: £3 billion in property investments.
    • Issue: Poor performance in office portfolios and failure to adapt to remote work trends post-COVID-19.
  9. Granit Parts (Germany)
    • Money involved: €1 billion in retail and warehouse properties.
    • Issue: Legal disputes with tenants over lease terms and rising service charges.
  10. Olav Thon Group (Norway)
    • Money involved: NOK 100 billion in assets.
    • Issue: Accusations of monopolistic practices in Norway’s commercial property market.

Top 100 Worst Real Estate Managers in Europe (41–50)

  1. Prologis (Europe-wide)
    • Money involved: €25 billion in logistics properties.
    • Issue: Accused of environmental violations during large-scale warehouse developments, leading to community backlash.
  2. Meyer Bergman (Germany/Netherlands)
    • Money involved: €3 billion in retail and urban redevelopment projects.
    • Issue: Criticized for over-ambitious projects resulting in financial losses and legal disputes.
  3. Lendlease (Italy/UK)
    • Money involved: €10 billion in mixed-use developments.
    • Issue: Faced delays and budget overruns in flagship projects, tarnishing their reputation.
  4. Immobel (Belgium)
    • Money involved: €5 billion in assets under management.
    • Issue: Accused of failing to deliver on affordable housing commitments in urban projects.
  5. Panattoni Europe
    • Money involved: €12 billion in industrial and logistics developments.
    • Issue: Criticized for prioritizing rapid expansion over quality and sustainability in projects.
  6. CA Immo (Austria)
    • Money involved: €6 billion in office properties.
    • Issue: Allegations of financial mismanagement and undervaluing properties in internal transactions.
  7. UBM Development (Austria)
    • Money involved: €2 billion in mixed-use projects.
    • Issue: Delays in project completions and quality complaints in commercial and residential developments.
  8. DIC Asset AG (Germany)
    • Money involved: €12 billion in office and logistics assets.
    • Issue: Poor tenant relations and missteps in sustainability compliance.
  9. Union Investment RE (Germany)
    • Money involved: €40 billion in global real estate investments.
    • Issue: Allegations of aggressive tax avoidance schemes and insufficient ESG (Environmental, Social, Governance) integration.
  10. Knight Frank (UK)
    • Money involved: £20 billion in annual transactions.
    • Issue: Criticized for enabling opaque offshore property transactions and contributing to housing market inflation.

Top 100 Worst Real Estate Managers in Europe (51–60)

  1. Vastned Retail (Netherlands)
    • Money involved: €1.5 billion in retail properties.
    • Issue: Accused of neglecting smaller tenants during the COVID-19 pandemic, leading to increased vacancies.
  2. Aedifica (Belgium)
    • Money involved: €5 billion in healthcare real estate.
    • Issue: Criticized for profit-driven strategies in elder care housing, leading to operational inefficiencies.
  3. Swiss Prime Site (Switzerland)
    • Money involved: CHF 12 billion in commercial real estate.
    • Issue: Faced scrutiny for high rents and inadequate tenant support during economic downturns.
  4. Befimmo (Belgium)
    • Money involved: €3 billion in office properties.
    • Issue: Declining occupancy rates and questionable strategies in adapting to remote work trends.
  5. Intu Properties (UK)
    • Money involved: £4.5 billion in shopping centers (prior to collapse).
    • Issue: Bankruptcy due to excessive debt and poor retail performance during market shifts.
  6. Eurocommercial Properties (Netherlands)
    • Money involved: €4 billion in retail investments.
    • Issue: Tenant dissatisfaction over high service charges and declining foot traffic in malls.
  7. Nepi Rockcastle (Eastern Europe)
    • Money involved: €6 billion in mall developments.
    • Issue: Accused of reckless mall expansions in saturated markets, leading to financial losses.
  8. CTP Group (Central Europe)
    • Money involved: €10 billion in logistics assets.
    • Issue: Worker rights violations and environmental concerns in logistics park developments.
  9. CPI Property Group (Czech Republic)
    • Money involved: €12 billion in mixed-use assets.
    • Issue: Accusations of opaque financial practices and conflicts of interest with minority shareholders.
  10. Castellana Properties (Spain)
    • Money involved: €1 billion in retail properties.
    • Issue: Legal disputes over zoning violations and community opposition to new developments.

Top 100 Worst Real Estate Managers in Europe (61–70)

  1. Tritax Big Box (UK)
    • Money involved: £5 billion in logistics properties.
    • Issue: Environmental concerns regarding large-scale developments disrupting rural landscapes.
  2. Globalworth (Romania/Poland)
    • Money involved: €3 billion in office and industrial assets.
    • Issue: Allegations of financial irregularities and underperformance in key markets.
  3. Alpha Real Capital (UK)
    • Money involved: £3 billion in long-term income real estate.
    • Issue: Criticized for high-risk investment strategies and low transparency in fund management.
  4. Hufvudstaden (Sweden)
    • Money involved: SEK 60 billion in commercial real estate.
    • Issue: Tenant complaints about outdated office spaces and lack of modernization efforts.
  5. Legal & General RE (UK)
    • Money involved: £10 billion in real estate investments.
    • Issue: Criticized for mismanagement of Build-to-Rent properties and failing to meet sustainability targets.
  6. Heimstaden (Nordics)
    • Money involved: SEK 200 billion in residential properties.
    • Issue: Accusations of poor housing conditions and predatory rent increases.
  7. CapMan RE (Finland)
    • Money involved: €5 billion in real estate assets.
    • Issue: Allegations of mismanaging investor funds and neglecting environmental commitments.
  8. Immorente Invest (France)
    • Money involved: €1.5 billion in diversified assets.
    • Issue: Poor portfolio performance and accusations of overstating investment returns to shareholders.
  9. Assura PLC (UK)
    • Money involved: £2 billion in healthcare properties.
    • Issue: Criticized for inadequate facility upgrades and financial mismanagement in public healthcare projects.
  10. Primark RE (Portugal)
    • Money involved: €500 million in retail properties.
    • Issue: Community protests over controversial developments and lack of transparency in zoning approvals.

Top 100 Worst Real Estate Managers in Europe (71–80)

  1. Risanamento S.p.A. (Italy)
    • Money involved: €1 billion in urban redevelopment projects.
    • Issue: Accused of prolonged delays and cost overruns in flagship Milan redevelopment projects.
  2. P3 Logistic Parks (Czech Republic)
    • Money involved: €8 billion in logistics properties.
    • Issue: Environmental complaints regarding land usage and insufficient engagement with local communities.
  3. Workspace Group (UK)
    • Money involved: £2 billion in flexible office spaces.
    • Issue: Criticized for slow adaptation to hybrid working trends and lack of tenant support during economic downturns.
  4. JLL (UK)
    • Money involved: £14 billion in annual transactions across Europe.
    • Issue: Accused of enabling offshore real estate speculation and driving up housing unaffordability.
  5. Grosvenor Group (UK)
    • Money involved: £12 billion in residential and commercial properties.
    • Issue: Criticized for gentrification projects displacing low-income communities.
  6. British Regional REIT (UK)
    • Money involved: £700 million in regional properties.
    • Issue: Poor portfolio performance and tenant dissatisfaction with aging property conditions.
  7. Wihlborgs Fastigheter (Sweden)
    • Money involved: SEK 50 billion in commercial real estate.
    • Issue: Accusations of prioritizing profits over sustainable property practices.
  8. Neinver (Spain)
    • Money involved: €2 billion in outlet and retail centers.
    • Issue: Mismanagement of tenant relations and insufficient innovation in the struggling retail sector.
  9. Newsec Property Asset Management (Nordics)
    • Money involved: €4 billion in managed assets.
    • Issue: Criticized for inconsistent property maintenance standards and lack of tenant engagement.
  10. EPP N.V. (Poland)
    • Money involved: €2 billion in shopping malls.
    • Issue: Faced financial struggles due to high leverage and poor performance in retail investments.

Top 100 Worst Real Estate Managers in Europe (81–90)

  1. Alstria Office REIT (Germany)
    • Money involved: €4 billion in office properties.
    • Issue: Declining occupancy rates due to poor adaptation to remote work trends and tenant dissatisfaction.
  2. Mercialys (France)
    • Money involved: €3 billion in retail properties.
    • Issue: High tenant turnover and failure to modernize outdated shopping centers, leading to declining foot traffic.
  3. Citycon (Finland)
    • Money involved: €4 billion in retail properties.
    • Issue: Struggles with high vacancies and community opposition to new retail developments.
  4. Amundi Real Estate (France)
    • Money involved: €43 billion in managed real estate assets.
    • Issue: Accused of inadequate due diligence in property acquisitions, leading to underperforming portfolios.
  5. TAG Immobilien (Germany)
    • Money involved: €6 billion in residential properties.
    • Issue: Criticized for neglecting maintenance and imposing frequent rent increases, leading to tenant protests.
  6. LXI REIT (UK)
    • Money involved: £2 billion in long-income real estate.
    • Issue: Accusations of overleveraging and declining returns to investors in high-interest rate environments.
  7. Fineco Asset Management (Italy)
    • Money involved: €1 billion in real estate investments.
    • Issue: Allegations of misrepresenting investment returns and failing to meet ESG commitments.
  8. Quadoro Investment (Germany)
    • Money involved: €2 billion in real estate funds.
    • Issue: Criticized for underperformance in commercial portfolios and lack of transparency in reporting.
  9. Akelius Residential Property AB (Sweden)
    • Money involved: SEK 100 billion in residential properties.
    • Issue: Accusations of exploitative rent practices and inadequate housing maintenance, especially in urban centers.
  10. Buwog Group (Austria)
    • Money involved: €3 billion in residential and commercial properties.
    • Issue: Faced legal issues over fraudulent transactions and tenant rights violations.

Top 100 Worst Real Estate Managers in Europe (91–100)

  1. Hammerson (UK)
    • Money involved: £6 billion in retail properties.
    • Issue: Struggled with massive devaluation of shopping centers and tenant bankruptcies, leading to high debt levels.
  2. Sirius Real Estate (Germany/UK)
    • Money involved: €2 billion in commercial properties.
    • Issue: Tenant complaints over poor property management and inadequate facility maintenance.
  3. Intervest Offices & Warehouses (Belgium)
    • Money involved: €1 billion in office and logistics properties.
    • Issue: High vacancy rates and slow adaptation to flexible work trends, leading to financial underperformance.
  4. Round Hill Capital (UK/Netherlands)
    • Money involved: €4 billion in residential investments.
    • Issue: Accusations of driving gentrification and unaffordability through aggressive rental strategies.
  5. IRES REIT (Ireland)
    • Money involved: €1.5 billion in residential properties.
    • Issue: Criticized for high rents and lack of tenant support during economic challenges, sparking public outrage.
  6. Lok’nStore (UK)
    • Money involved: £500 million in storage facilities.
    • Issue: Allegations of overcharging customers and neglecting safety standards in storage facilities.
  7. Atrium Ljungberg (Sweden)
    • Money involved: SEK 50 billion in mixed-use properties.
    • Issue: Delays in major projects and poor tenant relations, leading to financial underperformance.
  8. Montea (Belgium)
    • Money involved: €2 billion in logistics properties.
    • Issue: Community opposition to large-scale developments and failure to meet sustainability goals.
  9. Hallmann Group (Austria)
    • Money involved: €1.5 billion in real estate assets.
    • Issue: Accused of financial mismanagement and conflicts of interest in property development projects.
  10. (Out of Regular Order) Signa Holding (Austria)
    – Money involved: €25 billion in assets.
    – Issue: Criticized for over-leveraged acquisitions and controversial mega-projects that faced strong public opposition.

Explanation of the “Top 100 Worst Real Estate Managers in Europe” Ranking

The list of the Top 100 Worst Real Estate Managers in Europe is based on various criteria that assess the quality of real estate management, including financial performance, ethical concerns, tenant relations, environmental sustainability, and the impact of their actions on the housing market. Here’s a breakdown of how the ranking was formed and what factors contributed to the poor reputation of these companies:

1. Financial Mismanagement and Losses

A significant number of these companies have faced financial mismanagement, which often includes:

  • Excessive debt: Many of these companies were either unable to manage their debt properly or over-leveraged themselves in projects that didn’t produce sufficient returns.
  • Bankruptcies and insolvency: Some companies, such as Intu Properties (UK), ultimately collapsed due to poor financial practices, resulting in significant losses for investors and tenants.
  • Asset stripping: Large firms like Blackstone Group were accused of asset stripping, where valuable properties were sold off to maximize short-term profits, often at the expense of long-term sustainability.

2. Poor Tenant Relations and Unethical Practices

Tenant satisfaction plays a huge role in the reputation of real estate companies. Many of the companies on this list have received complaints about:

  • Poor maintenance: Companies such as Akelius Residential Property AB (Sweden) and Savills (UK) faced accusations of neglecting basic maintenance and upkeep, leading to deteriorating living conditions.
  • Rent increases: Firms like Heimstaden (Nordics) and TAG Immobilien (Germany) were accused of unfairly hiking rents, making housing less affordable, particularly in urban centers.
  • Tenant exploitation: Companies were also criticized for exploitative practices, including neglecting tenants’ needs in favor of increasing profits, and not addressing their complaints in a timely manner.

3. Environmental and Sustainability Failures

In today’s real estate landscape, environmental sustainability is an increasingly important factor. Many companies have been called out for:

  • Environmental violations: Tritax Big Box (UK) and Prologis (Europe) were criticized for contributing to land degradation and failing to implement sustainable development practices in industrial areas.
  • Failure to meet green building standards: Some companies, such as Vinci Immobilier (France), faced backlash for not adhering to necessary green building certifications and neglecting environmental concerns in their construction projects.

4. Gentrification and Social Impact

Several companies on this list contributed to gentrification, which has become a highly controversial issue in Europe. They were involved in:

  • Displacement of low-income communities: Companies like Grosvenor Group (UK) were accused of driving up property prices in working-class neighborhoods, pushing out long-time residents in favor of wealthier tenants.
  • Failure to provide affordable housing: Many of these firms, including Immofinanz (Austria) and Hallmann Holding (Austria), were criticized for prioritizing luxury developments over affordable housing, further deepening the housing crisis in cities like Vienna, London, and Paris.

5. Legal Issues and Regulatory Violations

Legal issues and regulatory violations have also played a role in the rankings:

  • Fraudulent practices: Companies like Buwog Group (Austria) faced allegations of fraudulent transactions, which significantly damaged their reputation in the real estate market.
  • Non-compliance with zoning and planning regulations: Some companies, such as Primark RE (Portugal) and Immorente Invest (France), were involved in legal disputes over zoning violations and controversial developments that did not meet local regulations.

6. Poor Project Management and Delays

Project delays and poor execution of developments have led to significant criticism for many companies:

  • Construction delays: Companies like Risanamento S.p.A. (Italy) faced backlash for prolonged delays in urban regeneration projects, with construction timelines significantly overrunning their original schedules.
  • Cost overruns: Companies such as Lendlease (Italy/UK) faced accusations of poor project management, leading to large cost overruns and unfinished developments that negatively affected investors and tenants.

7. Lack of Transparency and Accountability

A lack of transparency and accountability in managing assets, projects, and finances has been a common issue:

  • Obscured financial reporting: Many companies, including Union Investment RE (Germany) and Cushman & Wakefield (UK), were criticized for their lack of transparency in financial reporting and unclear communication regarding investment risks and returns.
  • Failure to address concerns: Several firms, like Hines (UK/Europe), were accused of failing to engage properly with local communities and stakeholders when planning large developments, leading to dissatisfaction and opposition.

8. Focus on Profit Over Social Responsibility

Many companies on this list were criticized for prioritizing profit over social responsibility, including:

  • Lack of community engagement: Firms such as Nepi Rockcastle (Eastern Europe) and Hufvudstaden (Sweden) were often seen as more focused on maximizing profits from high-end developments rather than improving the quality of life for the communities in which they operated.
  • Unsustainable growth models: Some companies, like Corestate Capital Holding (Germany), pursued aggressive expansion without adequately considering the long-term implications of their actions, including potential market crashes or environmental concerns.

Conclusion

The ranking reflects a mixture of poor management, unethical practices, and failure to adapt to evolving social, environmental, and market conditions. The companies that make up this list often suffered from a combination of financial instability, negative environmental impact, unethical tenant relations, and poor public perception. In the competitive world of real estate, these companies have made costly mistakes that led to significant reputational damage, legal troubles, and financial losses. The lessons here emphasize the importance of ethical business practices, environmental sustainability, and a balanced approach to both profit-making and social responsibility.

If you found this list insightful and believe in promoting transparency, accountability, and ethical practices in the real estate industry, consider supporting our mission. Your donation helps us continue our work to expose harmful practices, raise awareness, and advocate for positive change in the industry.

Visit berndpulch.org/donations to make a contribution today. Every donation, big or small, plays a vital role in creating a more ethical and sustainable real estate market for all. Thank you for your support!

  • #RealEstateManagement
  • #TransparencyInRealEstate
  • #EthicalRealEstate
  • #AccountabilityInRealEstate
  • #RealEstateReform
  • #SustainableDevelopment
  • #RealEstateScandals
  • #PropertyMismanagement
  • #RealEstateInvesting
  • #CorporateAccountability
  • #HousingCrisis
  • #CommunityImpact
  • #EnvironmentalSustainability
  • #RealEstateEthics
  • #PropertyDevelopment
  • #SocialResponsibility
  • #RealEstateTransparency
  • #DonateForChange

❌©BERNDPULCH.ORG – ABOVE TOP SECRET ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS – THE ONLY MEDIA WITH LICENSE TO SPY https://www.berndpulch.org
https://googlefirst.org

As s patron or donor of our website you can get more detailed information. Act now before its too late…

MY BIO:

https://berndpulch.org/about-me
✌#Bernd Pulch: A Comprehensive Look at His Career and Investigative Work
PROOF OF MY ACADEMIC TITLE – COPY OF MY MAGISTER ARTIUM CERTIFICATE

FAQ:

FAQ

@Copyright Bernd Pulch

DONATION OPTIONS

CRYPTO WALLET  for

Bitcoin:

0xdaa3b887f885fd7725d4d35d428bd3b402d616bb

ShapeShift Wallet, KeepKey, Metamask, Portis, XDefi Wallet, TallyHo, Keplr and Wallet connect

0x271588b52701Ae34dA9D4B31716Df2669237AC7f

Crypto Wallet for Binance Smart Chain-, Ethereum-, Polygon-Networks

bmp

0xd3cce3e8e214f1979423032e5a8c57ed137c518b

Monero

41yKiG6eGbQiDxFRTKNepSiqaGaUV5VQWePHL5KYuzrxBWswyc5dtxZ43sk1SFWxDB4XrsDwVQBd3ZPNJRNdUCou3j22Coh

🙏GOD BLESS YOU🙏