|8 December 2014
4 December 2014. Add 63 pages to The Intercept. Tally now *2,627 pages of The Guardian first reported 58,000 files; caveat: Janine Gibson, The Guardian NY, said on 30 January 2014 “much more than 58,000 files in first part, two more parts” (no numbers) (tally now less than ~4.3%). DoD claims 1,700,000 files (~.015% of that released). ACLU lists 525 pages released by the press. However, if as The Washington Post reported, a minimum of 250,000 pages are in the Snowden files, then less than 1% have been released. Note Greenwald claim on 13 September 2014 of having “hundreds of thousands” of documents.
25 November 2014. Add 72 pages to Süddeutsche Zeitung.
17 November 2014, charts by Cryptome:
6 November 2014. At current rate of release it will take 31 to 908 years for full disclosure.
10 October 2014. Add 69 pages to The Intercept.
17 September 2014. Add 2 pages to The Intercept.
14 September 2014. Add 68 pages to Der Spiegel.
13 September 2014. In video Glenn Greenwald claims to have “hundreds of thousands” of documents (at 9:06 min)
Audio excerpt: http://youtu.be/xnfIp38AAhM
5 September 2014. Add 32 pages to The Intercept. Tally now *2,293 pages of The Guardian first reported 58,000 files; caveat: Janine Gibson, The Guardian NY, said on 30 January 2014 “much more than 58,000 files in first part, two more parts” (no numbers) (tally now less than ~3.5%). DoD claims 1,700,000 files (~.012% of that released). ACLU lists 525 pages released by the press. However, if as The Washington Post reported, a minimum of 250,000 pages are in the Snowden files, then less than 1% have been released.
31 August 2014. Add 34 pages to Der Spiegel.
25 August 2014. Add 55 pages to The Intercept.
16 August 2014. Add 26 pages to Heise.
12 August 2014. Add 6 pages to The Intercept.
5 August 2014. Add 12 pages to The Intercept.
4 August 2014. Add 23 pages to The Intercept.
25 July 2014. Add 4 pages to The Intercept.
14 July 2014. Add 8 pages to The Intercept.
14 July 2014. “I’m as mad as hell and I’m not going to take this anymore!”
Cryptome has sent a demand for accounting and public release specifics to holders of the Snowden documents: New York Times, Washington Post, The Guardian, Barton Gellman, Laura Poitrias, Glenn Greenwald, ACLU, EFF and John and Jane Does, US Citizens:
11 July 2014. See related essay, Open the Snowden Files, Krystian Woznicki, 11July 2014:
If a minimum of 250,000 pages are in the Snowden files, then less than 1% have been released.
9 July 2014. Add 8 pages to The Intercept.
9 July 2014. Add 1 page to Washington Post.
23 June 2014. Add 9 pages to Der Spiegel.
22 June 2014. Add 41 pages to Information-The Intercept.
Revised. This is included in entry above. 18 June 2014. Add 20 pages to The Intercept.
18 June 2014. Add 200 pages to Der Spiegel.
16 June 2014. Add 4 pages to Der Spiegel.
1 June 2014. Add 4 pages to New York Times.
23 May 2014. Cryptome placed online No Place to Hide, 310 pages, to compensate for failure to release Snowden documents:
19 May 2014. The Intercept released 12 pages.
13 May 2014. Glenn Greenwald released 107 pages, some new, some previously published, some full pages, some page fragments.
5 May 2014. Related tally of redactions of Snowden releases:
30 April 2014. Add 19 pages to The Intercept.
30 April 2014. Add 2 pages to Dagbladet belatedly.
5 April 2014. Add 21 pages to The Intercept.
4 April 2014. ACLU offers NSA documents search: https://www.aclu.org/nsa-documents-search
If more lists please send: cryptome[at]earthlink.net
2 April 2014.
29 March 2014. Add 1 page to Der Spiegel.
22 March 2014. Add 3 pages to Der Spiegel.
22 March 2014. Add 2 pages to New York Times.
21 March 2014. Add 7 pages to Le Monde.
20 March 2014. Add 6 pages to The Intercept.
18 March 2014. Add 4 pages to Washington Post.
13 March 2014. Add 1 page to The Intercept.
12 March 2014. Add 35 pages to The Intercept.
12 March 2014. Add 62 pages to New York Times. Add 2 pages to NRC Handelsblad.
7 March 2014. Add 8 pages to The Intercept.
27 February 2014. Add 3 pages to Guardian.
25 February 2014. Add 11 pages to NBC News.
24 February 2014. Add 4 pages to The Intercept.
24 February 2014. Add *50 pages to The Intercept (7 pages are duplicates of GCHQ Psychology).
18 February 2014. Add *45 pages to The Intercept (37 pages are duplicates of release by NBC News).
Note: Between 10-17 February 2014, The Intercept disclosed fragments of Snowden pages and the New York Times referenced some but as far as known did not release them in full. If available please send link.
10 February 2014. Add 1 page to NRC Handelsblad (via Electrospaces.blogspot.com).
7 February 2014. Add 15 pages NBC News.
5 February 2014. Add 14 pages NBC News.
31 January 2014. Add 27 pages to CBC News.
27 January 2014. Add 47 pages to NBC News.
27 January 2014. Add 18 pages to Anonymous via New York Times.
16 January 2014. Add 8 pages to The Guardian.
* 14 January 2014. Add 21 pages to Information.dk (duplicate).
* 13 January 2014. Add 4 pages to Information.dk (duplicate).
Related Snowden Document and Page Count Assessment:
* 5 January 2014. Add 16 pages to Der Spiegel (30 December 2013. No source given for NSA docs). Tally now *962 pages (~1.7%) of reported 58,000. NSA head claims 200,000 (~.50% of that released).
4 January 2014. The source was not identified for *133 pages published by Der Spiegel and Jacob Appelbaum in late December 2013. They are included here but have not been confirmed as provided by Edward Snowden. Thanks to post by Techdirt.
Glenn Greenwald tweeted:
Matt Blaze tweeted, 11:24 AM – 2 Jan 14
3 January 2014. Add 13 pages to Washington Post.
3 January 2014. See also EFF, ACLU and LeakSource accounts:
2 January 2014. Add 1 page to Washington Post published 10 July 2013.
* 31 December 2013. Add 16 pages to Der Spiegel.
* 30 December 2013. Add 50 pages of NSA ANT Catalog by Jacob Appelbaum (no source given for NSA docs).
* 30 December 2013. Add 21 pages from 30C3 video by Jacob Appelbaum (no source given for NSA docs).
* 30 December 2013. Add 42 pages (8 duplicates) to Der Spiegel (no source given for NSA docs).
* 29 December 2013. Add 4 pages to Der Spiegel (no source given for NSA docs).
24 December 2013. Add 2 pages to Washington Post.
23 December 2013
We’ve yet to see the full impact of former National Security Agency contractor Edward Snowden’s unauthorized downloading of highly classified intelligence documents.
Among the roughly 1.7 million documents he walked away with — the vast majority of which have not been made public — are highly sensitive, specific intelligence reports, as well as current and historic requirements the White House has given the agency to guide its collection activities, according to a senior government official with knowledge of the situation.
The latter category involves about 2,000 unique taskings that can run to 20 pages each and give reasons for selective targeting to NSA collectors and analysts. These orders alone may run 31,500 pages.
13 December 2013. Add 26 pages to Trojkan (SVT). Tally now 797 pages (~1.4%) of reported 58,000. NSA head claims 200,000 (~.40% of that released). Australia press reports “up to 20,000 Aussie files.”
Rate of release over 6 months, 132.8 pages per month, equals 436 months to release 58,000, or 36.3 years. Thus the period of release has decreased in the past month from 42 years.
12 December 2013. Belatedly add 27 pages to Guardian and 18 pages to Washington Post.
21 November 2013. See also EFF and ACLU accounts:
3 November 2013
47 42 Years to Release Snowden Documents
Out of reported 50,000 pages (or files, not clear which), about 446 514 pages (>1% 1%) have been released over 5 months beginning June 5, 2012. At this rate, 89 100 pages per month, it will take 47 42 years for full release. Snowden will be 77 72 years old, his reporters hoarding secrets all dead.
NY Times, 3 November 2013:
Whatever reforms may come, Bobby R. Inman, who weathered his own turbulent period as N.S.A. director from 1977 to 1981, offers his hyper-secret former agency a radical suggestion for right now. “My advice would be to take everything you think Snowden has and get it out yourself,” he said. “It would certainly be a shock to the agency. But bad news doesn’t get better with age. The sooner they get it out and put it behind them, the faster they can begin to rebuild.”
Timeline of releases:
[See tabulation below for full timeline.]
5 October 2013
26 Years to Release Snowden Docs by The Guardian
Out of reported 15,000 pages, The Guardian has published 192 pages in fourteen releases over four months, an average of 48 pages per month, or 1.28% of the total. At this rate it will take 26 years for full release.
Edward Snowden will be 56 years old.
Edward Snowden Wife, Edward Snowden Movie, Edward Snowden Twitter, Edward Snowden Dead, Edward Snowden Quotes, Edward Snowden Interview, Edward Snowden Wiki, Edward Snowden Russia, Edward Snowden Net Worth, Edward Snowden 2017, Edward Snowden Age, Edward Snowden Antarctica, Edward Snowden Articles, Edward Snowden Actor, Edward Snowden And Trump, Edward Snowden And Julian Assange, Edward Snowden And Wikileaks, Edward Snowden Apush, Edward Snowden Ama, Edward Snowden And Lindsay Mills, Edward Snowden Biography, Edward Snowden Book, Edward Snowden Bin Laden, Edward Snowden Booz Allen, Edward Snowden Birthday, Edward Snowden Bbc, Edward Snowden Blog, Edward Snowden Birth Chart, Edward Snowden Bernie Sanders, Edward Snowden Bitcoin, Edward Snowden Cia, Edward Snowden Cnn, Edward Snowden Cast, Edward Snowden Chelsea Manning, Edward Snowden Current News, Edward Snowden Citizen 4, Edward Snowden Conservative, Edward Snowden China, Edward Snowden Chemtrails, Edward Snowden Contact, Edward Snowden Dead, Edward Snowden Documentary, Edward Snowden Definition, Edward Snowden Documentary Netflix, Edward Snowden Doc, Edward Snowden Donald Trump, Edward Snowden Dell, Edward Snowden Documentary Hbo, Edward Snowden Date, Edward Snowden David Hoffman, Edward Snowden Essay, Edward Snowden Email, Edward Snowden Ethics, Edward Snowden Ethics Essay, Edward Snowden Early Life, Edward Snowden Effect, Edward Snowden Ecuador, Edward Snowden Education, Edward Snowden Everything About Donald Trump, Edward Snowden Event, Edward Snowden Facts, Edward Snowden Family, Edward Snowden Film, Edward Snowden First Interview, Edward Snowden Facebook, Edward Snowden Father, Edward Snowden Full Movie, Edward Snowden Flat Earth, Edward Snowden First Tweet, Edward Snowden Fox News, Edward Snowden Guardian, Edward Snowden Glenn Greenwald, Edward Snowden Glasses, Edward Snowden Global Warming, Edward Snowden Gif, Edward Snowden Google, Edward Snowden Girlfriend Movie, Edward Snowden Good, Edward Snowden Grandfather, Edward Snowden Genius, Edward Snowden Hero, Edward Snowden Height, Edward Snowden House, Edward Snowden Hawaii, Edward Snowden High School, Edward Snowden Hong Kong, Edward Snowden History, Edward Snowden Heartbeat, Edward Snowden Haarp, Edward Snowden Hbo, Edward Snowden Interview, Edward Snowden Iq, Edward Snowden Instagram, Edward Snowden Interview 2013, Edward Snowden Imdb, Edward Snowden Interview 2017, Edward Snowden Images, Edward Snowden Interview 2016, Edward Snowden Income, Edward Snowden Iphone, Edward Snowden Job, Edward Snowden Journalist, Edward Snowden Japan, Edward Snowden Julian Assange Bradley Manning, Edward Snowden Java, Edward Snowden Journalism, Edward Snowden Joseph Gordon-levitt, Edward Snowden Julian Assange, Edward Snowden John Oliver Passwords, Edward Snowden Jean Michel Jarre, Edward Snowden Kunia, Edward Snowden Kimdir, Edward Snowden Katie Couric Interview, Edward Snowden Katie Couric, Edward Snowden Kaskus, Edward Snowden Kim, Edward Snowden Kasus, Edward Snowden Kfc, Edward Snowden Kim Jest, Edward Snowden Koenig, Edward Snowden Location, Edward Snowden Lindsay Mills Moscow, Edward Snowden Laptop, Edward Snowden Lindsay Mills, Edward Snowden Living, Edward Snowden Lawyer, Edward Snowden Life, Edward Snowden Latest News, Edward Snowden Latest, Edward Snowden Live Stream, Edward Snowden Movie, Edward Snowden Movie Netflix, Edward Snowden Movie Cast, Edward Snowden Military, Edward Snowden Movie Online, Edward Snowden Memes, Edward Snowden Middlebury College, Edward Snowden Married, Edward Snowden Moscow, Edward Snowden Medical Condition, Edward Snowden Net Worth, Edward Snowden Now, Edward Snowden News, Edward Snowden New York Times, Edward Snowden Netflix, Edward Snowden Natal Chart, Edward Snowden Nobel Prize, Edward Snowden Nsa Salary, Edward Snowden Npr, Edward Snowden Nationality, Edward Snowden On Trump, Edward Snowden Osama Bin Laden, Edward Snowden Obama, Edward Snowden Oscar, Edward Snowden On Movie, Edward Snowden On Twitter, Edward Snowden Openstack, Edward Snowden On Antarctica, Edward Snowden Os, Edward Snowden Original Interview, Edward Snowden Parents, Edward Snowden Political Views, Edward Snowden Privacy Tips, Edward Snowden Political Party, Edward Snowden Patriot Act, Edward Snowden Pictures, Edward Snowden Podcast, Edward Snowden Phone Case, Edward Snowden Poll, Edward Snowden Putin, Edward Snowden Quotes, Edward Snowden Quizlet, Edward Snowden Questions, Edward Snowden Quien Es, Edward Snowden Quote About Privacy, Edward Snowden Quotes Citizenfour, Edward Snowden Quick Facts, Edward Snowden Qualifications, Edward Snowden Russia, Edward Snowden Reddit, Edward Snowden Research Paper, Edward Snowden Real Name, Edward Snowden Residence, Edward Snowden Resume, Edward Snowden Robot, Edward Snowden Recommended Apps, Edward Snowden Reporter, Edward Snowden Russian, Edward Snowden Story, Edward Snowden Salary, Edward Snowden Status, Edward Snowden Signal, Edward Snowden Speech, Edward Snowden Security Tips, Edward Snowden Shirt, Edward Snowden Siblings, Edward Snowden Special Forces, Edward Snowden Still Alive, Edward Snowden Twitter, Edward Snowden Today, Edward Snowden Trump, Edward Snowden Timeline, Edward Snowden Ted Talk, Edward Snowden The Guardian, Edward Snowden Trailer, Edward Snowden The Movie, Edward Snowden T Shirt, Edward Snowden Tor, Edward Snowden Update, Edward Snowden Ufo, Edward Snowden Us Army, Edward Snowden University Of Michigan, Edward Snowden Used Tails, Edward Snowden Umich, Edward Snowden University Of Maryland, Edward Snowden Ufo Wikileaks, Edward Snowden Ufo Video, Edward Snowden Urban Dictionary, Edward Snowden Video, Edward Snowden Vpn, Edward Snowden Vice, Edward Snowden And Julian Assange, Edward Snowden Voice, Edward Snowden And Bradley Manning, Edward Snowden Vault 7, Edward Snowden Visa, Edward Snowden And Wikileaks, Edward Snowden Vanity Fair, Edward Snowden Wife, Edward Snowden Wiki, Edward Snowden Wired, Edward Snowden William And Mary, Edward Snowden Washington Post, Edward Snowden Who Is He, Edward Snowden Website, Edward Snowden Worth, Edward Snowden Wikileak, Edward Snowden Washington Post 2013, Edward Snowden Youtube, Edward Snowden Young, Edward Snowden Yahoo Answers, Edward Snowden Youtube Channel, Edward Snowden Youtube Documentary, Edward Snowden Yokota, Edward Snowden And Lindsay Mills, Edward Snowden Yify, Edward Snowden Zodiac Sign, Edward Snowden Zcash, Edward Snowden Zuckerberg, Edward Snowden Zoho, Edward Snowden Zizek, Edward Snowden Zimbabwe, Edward Snowden Zitate, Edward Snowden Zusammenfassung, Edward Snowden Zivilisation, Edward Snowden Zvi\u017eda\u010d,
|From: William A Blunden <blunden[at]sfsu.edu>
To: “jya[at]pipeline.com” <jya[at]pipeline.com>
Subject: Snowden Shills for U.S. Intelligence
Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2014 14:06:26 +0000From a recent Tech Crunch article covering a Snowden interview at the New Yorker Festival:
That’s it, he’s shown his hand.
He doesn’t question whether covert organizations like the CIA are compatible with democratic government. This guy is no Philip Agee or John Stockwell. He’s still keeping some of his tribal loyalties.
From: John Young <jya[at]pipeline.com>
Date: 7/23/2014, 09:08 ET
Subject: FOIA Request
Jennifer L. Hudson
Director, Information Management Division
Office of the Director of National Intelligence
Washington, D.C. 20511
Dear Ms. Hudson,
I request any and all information and records on documents reportedly taken by Edward Snowden from the National Security Agency, in particular:
1. An accounting of the documents by type, digital or non-digital, by number of files and pages.
2. To whom Edward Snowden transmitted the documents by name, occupation, nationality, and home address.
3. What documents were transmitted to each of the parties in Item 2, by type, number of files and pages.
4. Descriptions of consultation with the US government by those who received documents from Edward Snowden.
5. Descriptions of requests by the US government to redact or eliminate portions of the documents, to whom requests were made and date.
6. Assessments by the US government of the impact of the public release of the documents, by assessing agency with scope and date.
7. Agreements reached between the US government and the parties releasing and/or holding the documents for future release, by scope and schedule.
I am an individual seeking information for personal use and not for commercial use.
I am willing to pay $500 for my request.
I request a waiver of all fees for this request. Reason: This information will be published on the free public education website, Cryptome.org, to inform the public on the documents provided by Edward Snowden to commercial media.
251 West 89th Street
New York, New York 10024
Ever since the phrase “Information wants to be free” was first uttered in the early 80s, activists have campaigned for technology to act as a vehicle for knowledge. We’ve since seen the advent of the internet, the proliferation of personal computers, and the rise of whistleblowing sites.
Before Snowden and Wikileaks grabbed the headlines, there was Cryptome. Launched in 1996, the website, or “digital library,” as its owners John Young and Deborah Natsios describe it, is a tome of classified documents. Including everything from lists of MI6 agents to details on nuclear technology, the archive currently stands at over 71,600 files, spanning nearly two decades of disclosures.
Among those is all the available information on the Snowden files, and the duo behind the venture are adamant that the entirety of the leaked NSA documents should be dumped online, rather than strategically trickled out by journalists. Cryptome has even made vague hints that the Snowden documents may be released in full this month.
I phoned up Young and Natsios to ask how they felt the freedom of information movement has changed, for better or worse, over the past two decades.
When Cryptome was launched as a bare-bones website and started to host an assortment of documents for anyone to sift through, there weren’t many ways to get information out onto the internet. “We happened to have the technology to turn paper documents into a digital form,” Young told me. “A lot of other people didn’t yet have that technology: scanners, formatters.”
They offered this service to the cypherpunks list, an email chain linking some of the biggest movers and shakers in cryptography. Julian Assange was an avid reader, and years later the first vestiges of Bitcoin would be posted among its members.
Young and Natsios are both licensed architects in New York. They said they thought it was ironic that Cryptome is considered an underground project, because “our work does increasingly take us to underground sites, in fact.” These might be a subway system expansion, or vaults beneath sidewalks. Young and Natsios quite literally expose what is lying underneath the city.
Below the glitz of Times Square and hubbub of Manhattan, there’s a different world that directly influences the surface. One of their jobs involves making sure that these hidden spaces are functioning correctly. “Because we’re called into urban infrastructures in moments of crisis and disrepair, you could say we’re involved in ‘radical’ cultures of repair,” Natsios said.
While their architectural work is keeping the city in a good state of repair, their freedom of information work (i.e. publishing classified documents) does the same for the public domain, also in a “radical” way. “We are required by state laws as architects to police issues of public health, safety and welfare. This is in the name of the public good. From Cryptome’s perspective, we are obliged as architects to police the police, if you will. We are obliged to dissent, as required for the public good,” she said.
We are required by state laws as architects to police issues of public health, safety and welfare.
Of course, a counter analogy could suggest that the whirring of pipes underneath the surface needs to be closed off to avoid being tampered with by those with a malicious intent, that having them publicly accessible could put the city in danger, just as having government secrets available on the internet could pose its own risks.
Ten years after Cryptome first started, Wikileaks arrived. Wikileaks has been responsible for some of the most shattering disclosures in recent history, such as the Iraq war logs or the Trans-Pacific Partnership, and although both outlets act in fairly similar ways, Wikileaks differed in one key aspect.
“The critical thing [Wikileaks] brought to it, which we’ve never done, is that they used publicity and advertising, and sought press coverage,” Young said. “They ran a press operation with press releases. They went into a high profile operation.”
You might think that would be beneficial to freedom of information, encouraging more public engagement, but Natsios disagrees. “[Wikileaks] brought some troubling methodologies into the frame, that is the embracing of a kind of public relations sensationalism at each and every turn,” she said. The public, in her eyes, “are less educated, they’re not embracing the nuances of issues and are becoming passive themselves. They are passively consuming sensational tidbits, and the public good isn’t served by that kind of consumer behaviour.” Instead of taking Wikileaks’ material and dealing with it in a productive manner, she said, people are waiting “for the ever greater adrenaline jolt of the next sensational terabyte of leaks released.”
Cryptome has a similar stance on the handling of the Snowden documents. “Mr. Snowden, please send your 41 PRISM slides and other information to less easily cowed and overly coddled commercial outlets than Washington Post and Guardian,” the couple wrote on the site in June 2013.
When asked what they would do if Cryptome had access to the Snowden documents, Young told Gawker, “We would have dumped it, the whole thing. Everyone else likes to play this game: ‘What if we harm somebody’ or all this kind of crap. Which is strictly cowardice. Of course the companies who run the outlets, their lawyers won’t let them do this kind of thing, so if you’ve got money invested in your operation you won’t take these kind of risks.”
The Intercept recently decided not to disclose the name of one country that the Snowden documents reported had 100 percent of its phone traffic recorded. It justified its decision because of “specific, credible concerns that doing so could lead to increased violence,” according to the article. Wikileaks, however, later revealed the country to be Afghanistan.
In order to avoid pressures to suppress details, Young and Natsios are reluctant for Cryptome to be considered in any way an institution. “We find that increasingly because of legal and financial pressures, institutionalized freedom of information groups become quite inflexible, not agile, not tactical enough,” said Natsios.
“We prefer being independent agents: We prefer that agility, we prefer that daily lack of master-plan agitation, and not being limited by the annual report obligations upon freedom of information non-profits; we have no annual report.” This is perhaps why Cryptome releases more controversial files than other groups, such as graphic photos of the Iraq war.
Cryptome basically thinks that the more information released, the greater the benefit for an informed public. “The Snowden team has been flunked out of not releasing this stuff by saying it will harm the nation, and I think we’re about to see something more harmful to the nation if they don’t release,” said Young.
He suggested, for instance, that more details might help people resist NSA surveillance. “The internet has been completely compromised, so it is not a good place for freedom of information,” he said. “It has been turned on the public, and Snowden has revealed some of that, but only two percent of it. He’s not revealed any of the means we need to counter that takeover.”
“We think the entire thing should be released, in order that more people can work on the counter-surveillance side,” he continued. “Now there are people working on this, on how to take it back, but I think that they can’t take it back without the rest of Snowden’s material because they don’t know the depth of control [being carried out by intelligence agencies].”
The way that information is distributed has changed dramatically since Cryptome’s inception. From the cypherpunks to Wikileaks, and now journalism in a post-Snowden world, the public has undoubtedly become more informed about what its government is doing. But with more information available than ever before, Cryptome would argue, we still need to know more.
keinen Schwindel, kein Laster, das nicht von Geheimhaltung lebt.
Bringt diese Heimlichkeiten ans Tageslicht, beschreibt sie,
attacktiert sie, macht sie vor allen Augen lächerlich.
Und früher oder später wird die öffentliche Meinung sie hinwegfegen.
Bekannt machen allein genügt vielleicht nicht –
aber es ist das einzige Mittel, ohne das alle anderen Versagen…”