BERND PULCH.ORG – THE INDEPENDENT VOICE OF FREEDOM – NO MORE FAIRY TALES – SCHLUSS MIT MÄRCHENSTUNDE – Kein Relotius – Keine Hitler-Tagebücher – Keine Peanuts – Great Reset, Build Back Better, TOXDAT, STASI Liste, STASI Schläfer Liste, KGB Liste, BDVP Liste, DDR POLIZEI Liste, GOMOPA4KIDS-Pädophilen-Netzwerk, GOMOPA Opfer Liste, GOMOPA Täter, NO FAIRY TALES – No Relotius – No Hitler Diaries – No Peanuts – Great Reset – Build Back Better – TOXDAT, STASI List, STASI SLEEPER List, KGB List, BDVP List, STASI Names A-Z, DDR-EAST GERMAN POLICE List, Offshore List, WEF Lists, Leaks Lists, GOMOPA4KIDS-Pedophiles-Network, GOMOPA Victims List, GOMOPA Offender Names, Stalin, Berija, Mao, Xi, Kim, Pol Pot, Putin, Erich Mielke, Ehrenfried Stelzer, Jochen Resch, Alexander Schalck-Golodkowski, Kim Philby, Wolfgang Schnur, IM Erika, Gregor Gysi, Gerhard Schroeder, Matthias Warnig, Friedhelm Laschütza, Angela Merkel, William Borm, Udo Albrecht, Gerhard Baumann, Gert Caden, Andreas Lorch, Anette Lorch, Britta Lorch, Catrin Lorch, Hermann Simm, Mischa Wolf, Peter Ehlers, Axel Hilpert, Thomas Promny, Jan Mucha, Klaus Croissant, Isabell Colonius, Sven Schmidt / Eagle IT, Gerd Löffler, Detlev K. Manthey, Dieter Feuerstein, Klaus-Dieter Maururg, Beate & Thomas Porteischat, Sonja Lünebn, Rainer Rupp, Christel & Günter Guillaume – The One And Only Website With The License To Spy !
There you can get the document as a downloadable secure file
This Pfizer patent application was approved August 31st, 2021, and is the very first patent that shows up in a list of over 18500 for the purpose of remote contact tracing of all vaccinated humans worldwide who will be or are now connected to the “internet of things” by a quantum link of pulsating microwave frequencies of 2.4 gHz or higher from cell towers and satellites directly to the graphene oxide held in the fatty tissues of all persons who’ve had the shot.
Fox News host Tucker Carlson reported on the contents of emails found in the laptop believed to have belonged to Hunter Biden, raising questions about whether a former top CNBC executive improperly directed his wife to make donations to political organizations.
The report focuses on Brian Steel, the former senior vice president of communications at CNBC, and an email sent in Sept. 2016 to the son of President Joe Biden.
Documents produced by the city of Philadelphia under a federal court order show millions of dollars in nonprofit grant money donated by Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg is being used to quadruple the number of voting places and massively grow the number of ballots cast in the Democratic stronghold on Nov. 3.
The Pentagon announced the US Army had awarded Pfizer a $3.5 billion contract to manufacture 500 million doses of its COVID-19 vaccine by the end of next year for distribution around the world.
The order matches the number of Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine doses purchased by the US government under an agreement announced last year by the Trump administration. Last month, Pfizer announced that the latest batch of 200 million doses would be delivered between October of this year and April of 2022.
In June, Pfizer and Germany-based BioNTech announced that they would provide 500 million doses “at a not-for-profit price” to the feds for distribution to more than 100 countries around the world, most of them in Africa.
“Our partnership with the U.S. government will help bring hundreds of millions of doses of our vaccine to the poorest countries around the world as quickly as possible,” Pfizer Chairman and CEO Albert Bourla said at the time. “COVID-19 has impacted everyone, everywhere, and to win the battle against this pandemic, we must ensure expedited access to vaccines for all.”
CITATION FROM MCAFEE OFFICIAL AKA MCAFEE AFTERLIFE:
“SHALL WE PLAY A GAME. . .? THE FINAL CHAPTER: [RED] OCT(Q)BER
GUESS WHOS BACK? @: THE WORLD IS MINE  ]OURS[ VVORLDVVIDE COINCIDENCE? WAVE>TSUNAMI? DEFINE_BLACKMAIL EXPAND YOUR THINKING NO 1 PERSON IS ABOVE ANOTHER  CHAIN OF COMMAND CHAIN OF CUSTODY EVERYTHING HAS MEANING TURN YOUR SPEAKERS UP LISTEN CAREFULLY WHERES THE HUNT? [BQQM] [BQQM] [BQQM] YOUR>NOT>READY NO SUCH AGENCY? FOR>THIS>SHOW >HERE C(Q)MES THE BAND< BRING_THE_PAIN 11:11 EYE.VVARNED.4OU RAIN_MAKER_en_ROUTE FOR_GOD&COUNTRY FOR_HUMANITY N0_COINCIDENCES_ THE TIME HAS COME VVE_ARE_THE>>ST(Q)RM<< RAYS[GOLDEN][LIGHT] AND VVE WANT YOU_2 BLACKQUT_COMMS_FF_ ATTEMPT? EXPECT_US DEFINE THE END-DEFINE LOGIC-DEFINE FUTURE-DEFINE PAST 11.3_11.4_11.5_11.11 >TOGETHER WE STAND UNITED_NOT DIVIDED >>TOGETHER WE FIGHT_DARK>LIGHT >>>TOGETHER AT LAST TIME 2 GET [K][R](A)[K][E][N] P[@]IN_INCOMING GERONIMO PREY WWG1VVGA
N.C.S.VV.I.C [N][Q][T][H][I][N][G] GODSPEED.
THIS PLATFORM IS MORE THAN PUSHING THE TRUTH WE ARE THE TRUTH!!!
With that being said I am pleased to Announce that McAfee Intel havejoined Forces with Team Telegram to Protect this Platform at all Costs Until [] Returns: WE ARE THE BEST WHITE HAT HACK3RS IN THE VVORLD. MAKE NO MISTAKE PROMISES FULFILLED WWG1VVGA
ICYMI: DEEPSTATE APTs/HACKERS/TRANNIES/FOREIGN ACTOR AGENTS VVE ARE THE FUCKING ST((Q))RM DONT EVEN WASTE YOUR TIME-THOSE WHO KNOW ALREADY KNOW NOTHING STOPS THIS [N][O][T][H][I][N][G] NOW REPEAT AFTER ME DEEPSTATE CLOWNS:
WE DO NOT FORGIVE WE DO NOT FORGET GOD WINS EXPECT US.
In 2004, Clinton Foundation Changed Its Method Of Accounting, As Described Below Under “Investment Definitions And Values.”
Certificates of deposit
Investment Return / Income
INVESTMENT DEFINITIONS AND VALUES
2013-2012:“Cash Equivalents Consisted Primarily Of Money Market Accounts With Brokers.” “The Clinton Foundation considers all liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less to be cash equivalents. At December 31, 2013 and 2012, cash equivalents consisted primarily of money market accounts with brokers.” [Clinton Foundation, IRS Form 990, 11/19/14]
2012-2011: “Cash Equivalents Consisted Of Money Market Accounts Held With Brokers And A Repurchase Agreement With A Financial Institution.”[Clinton Foundation, IRS Form 990, 9/10/13]
Clinton Foundation Investments In Securities Were Calculated At Fair Value Or Cost. “Investments in equity securities having a readily determinable fair value and in all debt securities are carried at fair value. Other investments are valued at the lower of cost (or fair value at time of donation, if acquired by contribution) or fair value.” [Clinton Foundation, IRS Form 990, 11/19/14]
Clinton Foundation: “Investment Return Includes Dividend, Interest And Other Investment Income; Realized And Unrealized Gains And Losses On Investments Carried At Fair Value; And Realized Gains And Losses On Other Investments.”[Clinton Foundation, IRS Form 990, 11/19/14]
Clinton Foundation: All Securities Held By The Clinton Foundation As Of 2013 Were “Money Market Funds, Equity Securities And Mutual Funds.” “Where quoted market prices are available in an active market, securities are classified within Level 1 of the valuation hierarchy. Level 1 securities include money market funds, equity securities and mutual funds. If quoted market prices are not available, then fair values are estimated by using pricing models, quoted prices of securities with similar characteristics or discounted cash flows. In certain cases where Level 1 or Level 2 inputs are not available, securities are classified within Level 3 of the hierarchy. The Clinton Foundation did not have any Level 2 or Level 3 measurements at December 31, 2013 or 2012.” [Clinton Foundation, IRS Form 990, 11/19/14]
ENDOWMENT AND 2013 UPTICK
CLINTON FOUNDATION RECONSOLIDATED WITH CLINTON GLOBAL INITIATIVE IN 2013, BOOSTING REVENUE AND EXPENSES
Clinton Foundation Chief Financial Officer Andrew Kessel: “In 2013 The Foundation Reconsolidated The Clinton Global Initiative Into Its Operations…Tax Document Shows A Corresponding Increase In Both Revenue And Expenses.”[Associated Press, 11/19/14]
CLINTON FOUNDATION BEGAN ITS ENDOWMENT DRIVE IN FY2013
Clinton Foundation: “The Clinton Foundation Endowment Was Created During The 2013 Fiscal Year.”[Clinton Foundation, IRS Form 990, 11/19/14]
Associated Press: Clinton Foundation “In 2013 Began Raising Money For An Endowment To Benefit Current Programs And Expand Into New Areas.” “‘In 2013 the Foundation reconsolidated the Clinton Global Initiative into its operations. As such, the … tax document shows a corresponding increase in both revenue and expenses,’ the foundation’s chief financial officer, Andrew Kessel, said in a statement. Kessel also said the foundation in 2013 began raising money for an endowment to benefit current programs and expand into new areas.” [Associated Press, 11/19/14]
Clinton Foundation:Through 2013, The Clinton Foundation Had Not “Used Or Invested Any Of The Endowment Funds Received” Because An Investment Committee Had Not Yet Adopted Policies And Procedures. “During 2014, the Foundation’s newly formed Investment Committee will approve and adopt investment policies and procedures to ensure that endowment funds and their related returns are spent in accordance with UPMIFA and donor’s intent and maintain the appropriate amount of risk and return for the Foundation’s purposes. The Foundation has not used or invested any of the endowment funds received (or any net appreciation from these funds classified in temporarily restricted net assets) during 2013 and will not do so until the Investment Committee approves and adopts the appropriate investment policies. For this reason, all endowment funds received during 2013 are held in cash and cash equivalents.” [Clinton Foundation, IRS Form 990, 11/19/14]
CLINTON FOUNDATION HAD RAISED $248 MILLION FOR ITS ENDOWMENT AS OF FEBRUARY 2015
CNN: Between 2011-2015, “Cheng Has Raised $248 Million For The Foundation Endowment.” “Since joining in 2011, Cheng has raised $248 million for the foundation endowment and worked diversify the group’s priorities. Foundation Spokesman Craig Minassian said ‘Dennis… expanded our ability to support programs that are strengthening health systems and improving access to lifesaving medicines in the developing world, helping communities confront the effects of climate change, creating economic opportunity, empowering women and girls and reducing childhood obesity and other preventable diseases in the United States.’” [CNN, 2/9/15]
February 2015: Clinton Foundation Chief Development Officer Dennis Cheng Left The Foundation And Was Expected To Become Hillary Clinton’s Finance Director Ahead Of A 2016 Presidential Campaign. “Dennis Cheng, the Clinton Foundation’s chief development officer, is leaving the philanthropic organization this week to join Hillary Clinton’s nascent pre-campaign.Cheng, who is expected to serve as Clinton’s finance director once the campaign officially kicks off, is currently pulling double duty for the Clintons by finishing his role at the foundation and starting to build a 2016 campaign fundraising team, according to a source.” [CNN, 2/9/15]
Bloomberg: Clinton Foundation “Raised $200 Million In 10 Months For Their Foundation’s Endowment.” “Bill, Hillary and Chelsea Clinton raised $200 million in 10 months for their foundation’s endowment, positioning the nonprofit to survive even if its cash-collecting namesakes engage in a 2016 presidential run.” [Bloomberg, 6/6/14]
2012: Clinton Foundation Endowment Was $292,000.“Bill Clinton, advised by longtime aide Doug Band, created the Clinton Foundation shortly after leaving the White House in 2001. In 2012, it took in $54.7 million in revenue and ended the year with $183.6 million in assets. Its endowment, though, was just $292,000.” [Bloomberg, 6/6/14]
CLINTON FOUNDATION RELIED ON LARGE DONORS FOR MOST OF ITS ENDOWMENT DRIVE
Bloomberg: “With Four-Fifths Of Their $250-Million Target In The Bank” The Clintons Changed “Fundraising Strategies To Include Small Donors.” “With four-fifths of their $250-million target in the bank, they are also changing fundraising strategies to include small donors — a tactic that would create a list that could be politically useful, as well.” [Bloomberg, 6/6/14]
Bloomberg: In Building The Endowment, “The Clintons’ Initial Appeals For Foundation Money Were To Contributors Who Could Give $1 Million Or More.” “The Clintons’ initial appeals for foundation money were to contributors who could give $1 million or more. Those answering that call included Irish cell phone billionaire Denis O’Brien, and Bill Austin, owner of Minnesota’s Starkey Laboratories. Others were charities founded by Mexican billionaire Carlos Slim Helu — the world’s second richest man — and one run by Chicago venture capitalist J.B. Pritzker and his wife.” [Bloomberg, 6/6/14]
Those Who Contributed At Least $1 Million To The Clinton Foundation Endowment Included Denis O’Brien, Bill Austin, Carlos Slim Helu’s Charity, And J.B. Pritzker’s Charity. “The Clintons’ initial appeals for foundation money were to contributors who could give $1 million or more. Those answering that call included Irish cell phone billionaire Denis O’Brien, and Bill Austin, owner of Minnesota’s Starkey Laboratories. Others were charities founded by Mexican billionaire Carlos Slim Helu — the world’s second richest man — and one run by Chicago venture capitalist J.B. Pritzker and his wife.” [Bloomberg, 6/6/14]
2014: Clinton Foundation Officials Were “Compiling A List Of Investment Management Firms To Maintain The [Endowment] Fund” And Getting Ready To “Put Out A Request For Proposals.” “The foundation’s officials are compiling a list of investment management firms to maintain the fund, and will soon put out a request for proposals, a foundation official familiar with the strategy said.” [Bloomberg, 6/6/14]
CLINTON FOUNDATION PLANNED TO INCLUDE ENDOWMENT SUPPORTERS IN ANNUAL PUBLIC DISCLOSURES
Bloomberg: “The Backers Of The Endowment Will Be Listed Along With Other Supporters In Annual Public Disclosures Going Forward.”[Bloomberg, 6/6/14]
FEDERALLY INSURED LIMITS
2012-2013: “Clinton Foundation’s Cash And Assets Limited As To Use Accounts Exceeded Federally Insured Limits By Approximately $166 Million.”[Clinton Foundation, IRS Form 990, 11/19/14]
2011-2012: “Clinton Foundation’s Cash Accounts Did Not Exceed Federally Insured Limits.” [Clinton Foundation, IRS Form 990, 9/10/13]
2009: “The [Clinton] Foundation’s Cash Accounts Exceeded Federally Insured Limits By Approximately $32 Million.”[Clinton Foundation, IRS Form 990, 11/10/10]
2008: “The [Clinton] Foundation’s Cash Accounts Exceeded Federally Insured Limits By Approximately $25 Million.” [Clinton Foundation, IRS Form 11/16/09]
2007: Clinton Foundation’s “Cash Deposits In U.S. Banks Exceeded Federally Issued Limits By Approximately $87 Million.”“At December 31, 2007 and 2006, the Foundation’s cash deposits in U.S. banks exceeded federally issued limits by approximately $87 million and $21 million, respectively.” [Clinton Foundation, IRS Form 990, 12/12/08]
2006:Clinton Foundation’s “Cash Deposits In U.S. Banks Exceeded Federally Issued Limits By Approximately…$21 Million.”“At December 31, 2007 And 2006, The Foundation’s Cash Deposits In U.S. Banks Exceeded Federally Issued Limits By Approximately $87 Million And $21 Million, Respectively.” [Clinton Foundation, IRS Form 990, 12/12/08]
2005: Clinton Foundation’s “Cash Deposits In U.S. Banks Exceeded Federally Issued Limits By Approximately…$32 Million.” “At December 31, 2006 and 2005, the Foundation’s cash deposits in U.S. banks exceeded federally issued limits by approximately $21 million and $32 million, respectively.” [Clinton Foundation, IRS Form 990, 11/14/07]
Clinton Foundation: Programmatic Investments Do Not “Focus On Production Of Income Or The Appreciation Of The Asset,” But Instead Act “Like Grants…[And] Have As Their Primary Purpose The Achievement Of The Clinton Foundation’s Programmatic Mission.” “The primary purpose of the programmatic investments is to further the tax exempt objectives of the Clinton Foundation and not focus on production of income or the appreciation of the asset. Like grants, these financial instruments have as their primary purpose the achievement of the Clinton Foundation’s programmatic mission.” [Clinton Foundation, IRS Form 990, 11/19/14]
Clinton Foundation: Programmatic Investments “Represent Ownership Interests In Other Organizations.” “These investments, which represent ownership interests in other organizations, are accounted for using the equity method of accounting, and are not subject to the fair value measurement requirements in ASC 958-320 due to these investments not meeting the definition of an equity security with readily determinable fair value. Investment return for the years ended December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 is comprised primarily of realized gains on programmatic investments.” [Clinton Foundation, IRS Form 990, 11/19/14]
2013: Clinton Foundation Lumped Programmatic Investments And Endowment Funds Under “Mutual Funds.” [Clinton Foundation, IRS Form 990, 11/19/14]
2013: Clinton Foundation Reported A $1,175,250 “Program-Related Investment” In FondoAcceso SAS. [Clinton Foundation, IRS Form 990, 11/19/14]
2013: Clinton Foundation Board Chairman Bruce Lindsey Was The Director Of FondoAcceso SAS. [Clinton Foundation, IRS Form 990, 11/19/14]
Clinton Foundation: “No Directors Of FondoAcceso Are Paid Or Receive Any Share Of Profits.” [Clinton Foundation, IRS Form 990, 11/19/14]
2013: Clinton Foundation Reported A Loss Of $26,348 On Program Investments. [Clinton Foundation, IRS Form 990, 11/19/14]
2012: “As Of December 31, 2012, The Clinton Foundation Recorded Impairment Losses Of Approximately $345,000 On Programmatic Investments.” [Clinton Foundation, IRS Form 990, 9/10/13]
Clinton Foundation Did Not Maintain Any Donor-Advised Funds. “Did the organization maintain any donor advised funds or any similar funds or accounts for which donors have the right to provide advice on the distribution or investment of amounts in such funds or accounts?…No” [Clinton Foundation, IRS Form 990, 11/19/14]
Clinton Foundation Planned On Adopting Policies To “Ensure That Endowment Funds And Their Related Returns Are Spent In Accordance With UPMIFA And Donor’s Intent.”“During 2014, the Foundation’s newly formed Investment Committee will approve and adopt investment policies and procedures to ensure that endowment funds and their related returns are spent in accordance with UPMIFA and donor’s intent and maintain the appropriate amount of risk and return for the Foundation’s purposes. The Foundation has not used or invested any of the endowment funds received (or any net appreciation from these funds classified in temporarily restricted net assets) during 2013 and will not do so until the Investment Committee approves and adopts the appropriate investment policies. For this reason, all endowment funds received during 2013 are held in cash and cash equivalents.” [Clinton Foundation, IRS Form 990, 11/19/14]
2013: Clinton Foundation Reported $0 Spent On Investment Management.[Clinton Foundation, IRS Form 990, 11/19/14]
Donated stocks do not appear to be included in total investments as listed in annual IRS 990 forms, but they are listed as noncash property contributions.
2007: Clinton Foundation Received Approximately $1.19 Million In Donated Stocks. [Clinton Foundation, IRS Form 990, 12/12/08]
2006: Clinton Foundation Received $530,668 In Donated Stocks. [Clinton Foundation, IRS Form 990, 11/14/07]
2005: Clinton Foundation Received Approximately $10.03 Million In Donated Stocks. [Clinton Foundation, IRS Form 990, 6/9/06]
2004: Clinton Foundation Received Approximately $6.28 Million In Donated Stocks. [Clinton Foundation, IRS Form 990, 9/23/05]
Above: Statement 9, 2007. [Clinton Foundation, IRS Form 990, 12/12/08]
Below: Statement 5, 2006. [Clinton Foundation, IRS Form 990, 11/14/07]
Above: Statement 4, 2005. [Clinton Foundation, IRS Form 990, 6/9/06]
Below: Schedule B, Part II, Noncash Property Given, 2004. [Clinton Foundation, IRS Form 990, 9/23/05]
December 18, 2018: In this picture we recognize Alain Mérieux, the older man in the middle, at that time still CEO of bioMérieux and next to him our … “We can still learn a lot from China” – Klaus during the award of the “Reform Friendship” Award “to Alain Mérieux in the presence of Xi Jinping in the Great Hall of Peoples in Bejing. Not really questionable for me. Hanging out with Klaus – you can do it, but you don’t have to. I was puzzled when I wanted to find out how to get hold of this prestige award and lo and behold … Alain Mérieux visited Schwab’s dream home China as early as 1978, where he decided on a comprehensive and permanent cooperation with Beijing. The cooperation should focus on the following areas: tuberculosis prevention, infection control, and the prevention and control of new infectious diseases – the “new infectious diseases” will sound very exciting until then. But it will be even more exciting, because Alain Mérieux not only promoted medical cooperation between China and France for decades, but also built production facilities for research and development as well as high-level biosafety laboratories in China. With his help, research in biomedicine and the prevention and control of infectious diseases could be improved. – I wonder, could she really do that? In October 2004 the “Sino-French cooperation agreement for the prevention and control of emerging infectious diseases” was signed by China and France. In March 2014, during a state visit to France, China’s President Xi Jinping visited the Mérieux Research Center for Life Sciences. At this point I would like to briefly mention the Mérieux Foundation … a quick look at the source will certainly not hurt – Horizon 2020 and Bill Gates send their regards in addition to Health Minister Professor Chen Zhu, Alain Mérieux was also Co-President of the Franco-Chinese Committee for Emerging Infectious Diseases. In this role, Alain Mérieux played a key role in setting up the P4 high-security laboratory … which opened in Wuhan in 2014. – Yep, the very same lab that hasn’t had really positive headlines lately. During the construction of the P4 high security laboratory in Wuhan, the potential BSL-4 laboratory workers were sent to France, the United States or Australia for BSL-4 training –
Here the question arises: Why to Australia? By the way, the reason why Alain Mérieux received this award is because in China he is considered a pioneer in supporting Chinese medical cooperation with the whole world. – So a little “thank you” from China.
A German IT project manager, who wishes to remain anonymous, has spent months creating an extensive and unique network document, labeled “The COVID Network Complex”. For the first time, it shows you the complex network of relationships between non-governmental organizations (NGOs), companies, documents, and people.
There are 6,500 objects and over 7,200 links, including the financial flows, and in parts also the amounts that have flowed.
Only publicly available sources were used in the analysis.
Council of Foreign Relations President Richard Haass
Former U.S. Secretary of Transportation Elaine Chao
Former U.S. Secretary of State James Baker
William McRaven, the former Commander of the United States Special Forces
Boston Red Sox owner John Henry
Major League Baseball commissioner Rob Manfred
Buffalo Bills and Sabres owner Terry Pegula
New England Patriots owner Bob Kraft
National Basketball Association commissioner Adam Silver
National Football League commissioner Roger Goodell
The University of Chicago President Bob Zimmer
Georgetown University President Jack DeGioia
Nicholas Christakis, Yale University’s Sterling Professor of Social and Natural Science
Shake Shack creator Danny Meyer
Dell Technologies CEO Michael Dell
Palantir CEO Alex Karp
“Breaking Bad” and “Better Call Saul” creator Vince Gilligan
“Murphy Brown” star Candice Bergen
Activision Blizzard CEO Bobby Kotick
Producer Brian Grazer
Casey Wasserman, the Los Angeles Olympic Organizing Committee president and head of marketing and management company Wasserman
Kevin Sabet, a former White House drug control policy advisor who founded Smart Approaches to Marijuana, a political organization opposed to marijuana legalization and commercialization.
MEDIA: Diane Sawyer, Anderson Cooper, Van Jones, Tom Brokaw, Gayle King, New Yorker reporter Evan Osnos, New York Times columnist Thomas Friedman, “Squawk Box” co-hosts Becky Quick and Andrew Ross Sorkin, and Lionel Barber, the former editor of the Financial Times.
At an October 10, 1983, meeting, Deputy Chairman of the KGB Kryuchkov confirmed to East German foreign intelligence spy chief Markus Wolf that some Soviet KGB agents abroad had begun systematically reporting on indicators of a possible Western nuclear first strike. In this conversation, Kryuchkov provides a bona fide to Gordievsky’s published February 1983 cable (Document 9) by stating that the KGB intelligence directorate had given “a few assignments to some KGB resident agents abroad who have to report on them every two weeks.”
Kryuchkov attempted to explain the necessity of RYaN to Wolf by stating that “Currently strategic nuclear weapons can be used in less than 24 hours. So this is about the phase of decision-making, and about working out a system that denies the adversary the option of a surprise.”
For his part, Wolf appeared skeptical of the concept of RYaN, writing in a 1984 an appended note that RYaN “must be complemented, revised, and made more precise,” and bemoaning “the problem of not getting deceived” by faulty indicators. He concluded that “clear-headedness about the entire RYaN complex” was a “mandatory requirement.” In an addendum that Wolf drafted, he stressed the need to know the “actual situation” rather than the picture presented by Operation RYaN’s indicators. “Constant and ongoing assessments,” he wrote, “have to be made whether certain developments actually constitute a crisis or not.”
Police in north-central Iowa have arrested a man suspected of beating a nearly 2-year-old boy to death last year. The Hampton Police Department reported that Jhonny Junior Salvatore Suarez Rivera was arrested Sunday in the 2020 death of 23-month-old boy. Rivera is charged with first-degree murder and child endangerment resulting in death, police said.
Police were called after the child was taken to a Franklin County hospital on Aug. 1, 2020, and pronounced dead about an hour later, investigators said. An autopsy showed the boy had died of blunt force injuries. Police said an investigation showed the boy had been in Rivera’s care when he was fatally injured. Rivera is being held in the Franklin County Jail.
Many pregnant persons in the United States are receiving messenger RNA (mRNA) coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) vaccines, but data are limited on their safety in pregnancy.
From December 14, 2020, to February 28, 2021, we used data from the “v-safe after vaccination health checker” surveillance system, the v-safe pregnancy registry, and the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) to characterize the initial safety of mRNA Covid-19 vaccines in pregnant persons.
Novaya Gazeta handed over to the CEC a recording of a secret training session, during which it was decided who would win the elections in the Moscow region and with what result: AUDIO
At the disposal of “Novaya” was an audio recording of a meeting on “falsification of elections” in Korolev, near Moscow. Tatyana Yurasova talks about what we learned from the recording: the falsification curator sets a task for the heads of election commissions and explains the technology of stealing votes.
On September 2, the recording and the official request of the editorial staff were sent to the Central Election Commission – we are waiting for the official response of Ella Pamfilova.
Will we have an understanding that the sites are being watched? – the chairman of one of the electoral commissions asked with alarm in his voice, having heard that the video broadcast from the polling stations of the Queen will be conducted constantly, day and night.
Someone expressed a doubt: how do you know about it – in the area of a thousand plots. The skeptic was interrupted by the briefing woman. “I think they will call us and tell us,” she confidently told the heads of the PECs of the Moscow Region Korolyov who had gathered for the training.
She talked about innovations during the three-day voting in the elections to the State Duma and the Moscow Regional Duma, about the organization of work and, among other things, about the methods of falsification and actions that exclude the risk of getting caught for forgery. “The main thing is composure and calmness,” the woman repeated several times, instilling confidence in those present that she had everything under control.
One of those present made an audio recording of the briefing and gave it to Novaya Gazeta with a small annotation. Three people independently listened to the anonymous recording and, in terms of timbre, manner of speaking and a number of characteristic turns, made an assumption: the voice of the “instructor” seemed to them very similar to the voice of the adviser to the head of the “Queen” Zhanna Prokofieva.
Zhanna Prokofieva at one of the meetings of the working group at the Electoral Commission of the Moscow Region
The latter arrived in the city “in the train” of the former mayor of Reutov, Alexander Khodyrev, when he set his sights on the post of head of the “space capital”. And she began to engage in elections: first as the chairman of the territorial election commission, and then unofficially, as the deputy mayor, when in January 2017 she was “left” due to scandals in the elections to the State Duma. It was the user under the nickname “Zhanna Prokofieva” who directed the telegram chat “September 2019”, where the chairmen of precinct commissions discussed falsifications in the elections to the city council in the fall of 2019.
On the audio recording, a woman with a voice, as one might assume, similar to that of Zhanna Prokofieva, described how election commissions, with the support of the administration, would falsify elections in favor of United Russia and what result they should get. To achieve it she proposed a technology against which even “smart voting” is powerless.
No, – several voices of the seminar participants were heard at once. Apparently, people from other cities were present. On the eve of the elections in September 2019, several dozen residents from other cities of the Moscow region were brought into the composition of the royal election commissions – primarily Reutov, Balashikha and Mytishchi. All of them worked in housing and communal services companies controlled by people from the inner circle of Mayor Khodyrev. But if Korolev, along with Pushkino and Sergiev Posad, were included in the 125th constituency for the elections to the State Duma, then Reutov, Balashikha and Mytishchi constituted the 117th constituency. Districts also differed in the elections to the Regional Duma.
[Sergei] Pakhomov – to the State Duma, Sergei Aykovich Kerselyan – to the Mosoblduma, – named the “instructor” the names of the candidates from the “United Russia”, campaigning and whose portraits the whole Korolev was pasted over. According to her, for single-mandate candidates, it is not the percentages that are important, but the number of votes.
A minute earlier, “Zhanna Prokofieva” announced the result that the election commissions need to ensure according to party lists: “We are interested in a specific figure and a specific party – 42–45% according to the party list”. She did not mention the name of the party, but during the seminar more than once they talked about the “services” that should be provided to this particular party – for example, on election day, not only the TEC, but also United Russia should be informed about the turnout for a certain hour.
The audio recording says that this task – to provide “United Russia” with 45% – was set allegedly by the Main Directorate of Territorial Policy of the Government of the Moscow Region,
held in Korolyov a meeting of the headquarters for elections in the 125th constituency. The meeting, according to Zhanna Prokofieva, was also attended by the heads of Pushkino and Sergiev Posad. Mayor of the Queen Alexander Khodyrev made a report and informed about the measures to achieve the desired result. I liked the report.
“But after the end of the speech of Alexander Nikolaevich [Khodyrev] there was a big request (and you yourself understand that any request from the government is a law, an order), […] that everything would go like a blank sheet: cleanly, without comments, without statements, without complaints , without violating the electoral legislation “, – the” instructor “conveyed the” wish “of the higher authorities.
“We ourselves want to do this, we ourselves do not want to justify ourselves, answer, testify, talk with representatives of law enforcement agencies, prosecutors and higher commissions,” the woman motivated the chairmen.
In 2019, after the release of the investigation of the falsifications in Korolev, Zhanna Prokofieva had to give explanations to the working group of the Moscow Regional Electoral Commission. At the very first meeting, the members of the working group discovered that the bales of documents in the storage of the royal TEC looked very different than the packages on the site, as evidenced by photographs of the observers. Zhanna Prokofieva was invited to the second meeting, and she gave an explanation: they say that at night the chairman found forgotten documents in the safe, so they had to open the bale and pack it again. Several PEC chairpersons were also summoned to the meeting, and although the attempt to figure it out was more like a performance, they also had to endure several unpleasant minutes. It is unlikely that the secretary of the TEC Ekaterina Tseplyaeva also enjoyed the inspection and visits to the court.
Two men took an active part in the briefing. The “instructor” introduced them as deputy heads in charge of the elections. One was named Sergei Viktorovich, the other – Pavel Vladimirovich. According to “Zhanna Prokofieva”, the head asked them to also be present to understand the specifics of voting and the mechanisms for implementing the task.
On the official website of the Queen’s administration, among the deputy heads there are
Sergey Viktorovich Ivanov
Pavel Vladimirovich Kotov.
Sergei Ivanov and Pavel Kotov. Photo from the site of the “Queen’s administration”
Having designated the problem, “Zhanna Prokofieva” suggested tried-and-tested methods for solving it.
Submitting fake observers
“I hope THEM will not have enough strength to catch us like that, – we see how everything is going now,” the woman “instructor” was busily analyzing possible threats. They, in her opinion, came mainly from observers.
The main parties did not arouse alarm among the administration: “we have no problems with the Liberal Democratic Party,” “the party of Rost, we are not worried,” and everything is in order with the Communist Party of the Russian Federation.
We should be fine with the communists – whatever they are, but they are ours, royal, and not pro-American. “Zhanna Prokofieva” confirmed what ordinary communists and active citizens had long guessed about. The local Communist Party of the Russian Federation did not conduct an active campaign, kept campaigning on a meager ration, the recruitment of observers was carried out almost in secret from the party members. Many of them did not rule out that they would watch for the sake of appearance, as it was in the elections in 2019. Then, from the correspondence in the chat of the falsifiers, everyone learned about a large number of “our Communist Party of the Russian Federation” – those who became observers from the Communist Party on behalf of the administration.
Only the observers of the candidate for the Moscow Regional Duma from the “Fair Russia” Olga Privalova instilled some alarm in “Zhanna Prokofieva”. The latter promised to close the polling stations with observers, to whom she was ready to pay money for three days of work. The recruitment took place on the VKontakte social network, it was reported by the local media, followed by Zhanna Prokofieva.
According to her, very few people were registered as observers. On the eve of the movement “Golos” was declared a foreign agent, and the “instructor” feared that the observers would be drawn to Privalovaya. Therefore, she suggested that the leadership of the election commissions step up in this direction.
“I think your fellow observers don’t care where to sit and do nothing, and even for a small salary,” she hinted transparently, avoiding words such as “zaslanets” and “fake observers”. At that time, there were about 60 people in the observer chat of the SR candidate.
“Only your own people, no one else,” shared “Zhanna Prokofieva” with a grin in her voice.
And nevertheless, despite all the efforts to make agreements and send fake observers, the “instructor” urged the participants of the seminar not to relax. Elections in the Queen rarely did without scandals, but here they asked to do everything cleanly and quietly. “Zhanna Prokofieva”, apparently, came up with a way to get the desired result and at the same time reduce the risks of failure to zero.
Voter and Observer Lists
“If you do everything competently, then even a smart, even stupid, even some kind of vote will not work,” Zhanna Prokofieva summed up, having finished answering the question from the audience about the turnout expectations.
In addition to home voting, which should account for 20% of the turnout, duplicate electoral lists should become the main mechanism for solving the problem. “One is for observers, the other is for voters,” said a woman with a voice that could be assumed to be similar to the mayor’s advisor, avoiding pronouncing the numbers out loud.
Judging by the reaction of the audience, everyone understood her perfectly.
The lists “for voters” are real; the voter signs on them upon receipt of the ballot. By counting the number of signatures, it is easy to find out the real turnout.
The lists “for observers” are fake, they will be pre-filled with the number of signatures required to get the “ER” result of 45%.
At some point, the “voter lists” will be replaced with fake ones. And “charging” ballots is not a problem, it is easier to manipulate them than to forge signatures on the go. Especially if there are observers at the site.
It is dangerous to work with a ready-made list – the voter can see what kind of a neighbor has signed.
“The [list] that will surrender, it turns out to be quite voluminous, by 45%. I advise you to start producing it immediately after receiving the sheets of the voter list, ”says Zhanna Prokofieva. It will take a lot of time to enter the data and sign for several hundred voters, so the “instructor” promises that the commissions will receive lists no later than 10 days before the start of voting.
The audience took the prospect of falsifying the lists calmly – after 15 minutes it turned out that this trick was used by the royal PECs at the all-Russian vote on the Constitution.
But the question of the timing of the change aroused keen interest because of the incident at the site number 1086 in the recreation center “Kostino”. During the voting on the amendments, the voter discovered that they had already signed for her and her relatives. Soon more than 40 people found fake signatures for themselves. One woman went to file a complaint with the prosecutor’s office, and the observer, Inna Karezina, called the police.
The commission urgently announced the disinfection of the premises, everyone was removed from the site. Upon their return, people suddenly found completely new books with voter lists on the PEC members – not the already worn and filled with fake signatures, but clean and almost without signatures. “It became clear that the commission had a duplicate list,” Karezina said later.
In the elections for amendments to the Constitution, observers at PEC No. 1086 Korolyov discovered fake signatures for voters. After the disinfection was suddenly announced at the site, the observers looked again at the lists – they were new and without violations.
To avoid a scandal escalation, the Moscow Regional Electoral Commission put pressure on the TEC, and as a result, voting at the polling station from June 25 to June 30, which is 1140 ballots, was invalidated.
According to independent analyst Sergei Shpilkin, an additional 41,000 votes were drawn in Korolev.
Apparently, that failure caused a lot of stress among the fraudsters, so at the seminar they arranged a detailed “debriefing”, trying to understand what was done wrong and where. According to “Zhanna Prokofieva” and “deputy head” Pavel Vladimirovich, the main mistake of the chairman of PEC No. 1086 Sergei Tarbin was that, being confused, he allowed outsiders to get acquainted with the list – observers, “people who failed, did not know and did not understand the legislation”, who came to the polling station in order to “assert themselves” at the expense of the PEC members.
“It is impossible to allow someone to get hold of the voter list until evening, this is nonsense,” the “instructor” instilled in the heads of election commissions.
And she prompted them to countermeasures: a preparation with references to articles of the law and strict observance of social distance.
She also instructed on the moment when it is best to replace the lists: “much after 20:00”: “At 20:00 on September 19, the last voter left, and you start: someone extinguishes unused ballots, and those who sat on the books [of the voter list ], – to work with books. And sit with them until the moment comes to replace them. At least sit until the carrot’s plot! “
In the 2019 local elections, observers were kept at polling stations until late at night. On the double federal and regional “carrot spell”, apparently, will stretch until the morning.
Returning to the story with the cancellation of the early deadline at PEC No. 1086, Zhanna Prokofieva, in fact, admits that the entire vote on the amendments was falsified: elections, and that this man [Inna Karezin] needed to be left at the polling station. To give, roughly speaking, this site as a sacrifice, so that she does not go further. “
According to the “instructor”, there was a lot of noise, people from a higher commission came to the recreation center “Kostino”, they called her herself from the CEC. “Well, nothing, we went through it,” said “Zhanna Prokofieva”.
On July 27, the Moscow Regional Electoral Commission made a decision on a petition to the Central Election Commission to award members of the Moscow Region electoral commissions with the honorary badge of the Central Election Commission of the Russian Federation “For merits in organizing elections”. Korolev is represented by one of the largest “delegations” – 12 people. The surnames for the most part coincide with the surnames of the participants in the “chat of forgers”.
At the polling station. Photo: Victoria Odissonova / Novaya Gazeta
Fraud scandals in Korolyov became an integral part of the electoral landscape with the accession of Mayor Khodyrev and his team to the city. And every time they invariably sounded the name of Zhanna Prokofieva. After the scandal with the removal of observers at the elections to the State Duma in 2016, she had to resign in order to then go for a promotion and continue to steer the elections.
At the end of October 2019, the CEC held a meeting at which they heard the report of the Moscow Regional Electoral Commission on checking the publication of Novaya Gazeta on falsification in Korolev. The head of the IKMO showed a presentation with a photograph of the working group and cheerfully reported to the CEC that then the case went downhill.
The head of the “chat of falsifiers” and its participants got away with it then. However, the diagnosis of “khodyrevshchina” was made, with which the CEC chairman identified the “remnants” of that most difficult negative phenomenon, reflecting flagrant violations in the electoral process of the Moscow region. The briefing made it clear to everyone that these “remnants” have long turned into metastases, and “Khodyrevschina” as a phenomenon is much broader, since, as one might assume, the government of the Moscow Region and patrons from the CEC are involved in it.
WE ARE WAITING FOR REACTION
On September 2, the recording and the official request of the editorial staff were sent to the Central Election Commission – we are waiting for the official response of Ella Pamfilova.
Báez became a friend of Kirchner in 1991, and in 2003 founded a construction company, Austral Construcciones, which was awarded many government contracts during Kirchner’s presidency. In 2011 Báez built Kirchner’s mausoleum. He has been called the main beneficiary of public contracts in Patagonia.
A federal grand jury in Washington, D.C., returned an indictment yesterday charging a U.S. citizen and resident of Timor Leste with seven counts of engaging in illicit sexual conduct in a foreign place.
According to court documents, Richard Jude Daschbach, 84, is a former priest who is alleged to have engaged in illicit sexual conduct with minor victims in Timor Leste starting in at least 2013. As alleged, Daschbach operated a “shelter home” for children in Timor Leste. Victims disclosed that Daschbach sexually abused them when they were children and resided in the shelter home. Daschbach was defrocked by the Catholic church after some of the victims disclosed the abuse to the church. Daschbach is currently facing related child sexual exploitation charges in Timor Leste. In addition, in 2019, a grand jury in the Northern District of California returned an indictment against Daschbach for wire fraud in connection with his fundraising activity for the shelter home.
Today’s indictment represents a significant step toward accountability for harms suffered by multiple vulnerable children allegedly victimized by this defendant,” said Assistant Attorney General Kenneth A. Polite Jr. for the Justice Department’s Criminal Division. “I’d like to thank the hardworking investigative and prosecution teams for their work today and every day to ensure that child predators face justice and children are kept safe.”
“This case shows that we will use the full extent of the law to prosecute U.S. citizens who allegedly prey on children, no matter how far we must go to bring them to justice,” said Acting U.S. Attorney Channing D. Phillips for the District of Columbia. “Together with our law enforcement partners, we must ensure that people placed in positions of trust do not betray their responsibilities to help the children who depend upon them.”
Daschbach is charged with seven counts of engaging in illicit sexual conduct in a foreign place, Timor Leste. If convicted, he faces a maximum penalty of 30 years in prison per count. A federal district court judge will determine any sentence after considering the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines and other statutory factors.
The FBI is investigating the case. The Justice Department’s Office of International Affairs provided significant assistance.
Trial Attorneys Jessica Urban and Alicia A. Bove of the Justice Department’s Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section (CEOS) and Assistant U.S. Attorney Amy Larson of the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Columbia are prosecuting the case. The Criminal Division’s Office of Overseas Prosecutorial Development, Assistance and Training (OPDAT) provided assistance.
This case was brought as part of Project Safe Childhood, a nationwide initiative to combat the growing epidemic of child sexual exploitation and abuse, launched in May 2006 by the Department of Justice. Led by U.S. Attorneys’ Offices and CEOS, Project Safe Childhood marshals federal, state and local resources to better locate, apprehend and prosecute individuals who exploit children via the internet, as well as to identify and rescue victims. For more information about Project Safe Childhood, please visit www.justice.gov/psc.
An indictment is merely an allegation and all defendants are presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law.